{"meta":{"query_hash":"39743aa4764f","filters":{"topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics"},"cohort_total":1528,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":1528,"exported":1528,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/39743aa4764f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Gender%2C+Labor%2C+and+Family+Dynamics"},"results":[{"id":"W100331388","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.34.3.357","title":"Ethnicity and Inequality: British Children’s Experience of Means-Tested Benefits","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Ethnic group; Poverty; Disadvantage; Inequality; Welfare; Welfare dependency; Demographic economics; Demography; Sociology; Economics; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.1217293519850453,"score_gpt":0.37618000481899805,"score_spread":0.25445065283395274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W100331388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9698253,0.026240582,0.00025594977,0.000066568624,0.0003647322,0.00014219143,0.000017272829,0.000009741517,0.0030776155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877705,0.011003463,0.0009069587,0.00015100677,0.00007921677,0.0000030000772,4.182346e-7,0.000005730135,0.00007973765],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978495,0.00052946917,0.00063598325,0.00016171629,0.0005686949,0.00025460342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976689,0.0003781781,0.00056163396,0.00009628181,0.001173224,0.000121755445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001022683,0.00014960414,0.00068536674,0.00008575408,0.00039184495,0.00004750895,0.00020037756,0.00006641105,0.000005880344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050426036,0.00014170121,0.000099587945,0.00036611903,0.00085082266,0.00029553205,0.000045271423,0.00020945494,6.0664127e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003294869,0.0002258295,0.702013,0.000022547256,0.00044826212,0.000008950132,0.27376896,0.0002051553,0.00030653222,0.021262445,0.0010793024,0.0006260525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050403224,0.00016334787,0.78362006,0.00010680115,0.00004472359,0.000011884246,0.21298562,0.000007641696,0.00008812716,0.0017318939,0.00059106725,0.0001448204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006536718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024814084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08160702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072182826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014997051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57784075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W100422282","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.31.1.19","title":"Intermittent Employment Among Married Women: A Comparative Study of Buenos Aires and Mexico City","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Demographic economics; Mexico city; Socioeconomics; Geography; Economic growth; Economics; Demography; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.10257161441217501,"score_gpt":0.37599021007206135,"score_spread":0.27341859565988635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W100422282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99157715,0.0028212564,0.000028638582,0.00012443004,0.0003414071,0.00054519455,0.000012289113,0.000015987454,0.004533641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697375,0.0018179936,0.000111621506,0.00011384885,0.00011766865,0.00002509295,3.7382804e-7,0.000007932817,0.00083171425],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996888,0.0007210317,0.0009582609,0.0002441982,0.00080655,0.00038200506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976516,0.00041411893,0.0006944609,0.00015461401,0.00088176,0.00020348927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095716666,0.00027752566,0.0012632746,0.0002286151,0.00060946686,0.00008364119,0.00033107647,0.00005742012,0.00003597655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004984254,0.0002217607,0.00012233881,0.00039925764,0.0012350059,0.00033628955,0.00009855754,0.0003001487,0.0000030851434],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032095163,0.0009576442,0.30224022,0.000012796306,0.0013496978,0.000018488558,0.69151187,0.00031509058,0.000059274775,0.00021639654,0.002441108,0.0005564736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009842948,0.0012466364,0.49305725,0.000055439177,0.00006364257,0.0000012956394,0.502788,0.000028451981,0.000012114645,0.00044844957,0.001182058,0.00013237025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068352453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033267743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19081703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031648276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001623855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90431386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W100894451","doi":"","title":"An econometric analysis of the “backward-bending” labour supply of Canadian women","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - IWU (Illinois Wesleyan University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Econometric analysis; Economics; Labour supply; Econometric model; Labour economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.014866160246936506,"score_gpt":0.20464315419536763,"score_spread":0.18977699394843112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W100894451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8825682,0.000017043121,0.000023630873,0.0001761714,0.00011802892,0.00019514491,0.00096422614,0.000025599107,0.115911976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962102,0.00006994356,0.000031697895,0.00005898086,0.000021591632,9.703556e-7,0.000059846094,0.000012097992,0.0035346646],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984967,0.0001404356,0.00026056534,0.0002708175,0.00029141,0.0005400705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828875,0.00013642975,0.00021638308,0.00054808636,0.0003088427,0.0005014856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020749417,0.00016337687,0.0003912545,0.0034305796,0.00044718882,0.00015049447,0.0012214888,0.000146625,0.00041992252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007171529,0.00015923237,0.0002628282,0.010929505,0.0004898025,0.0008715828,0.000108322754,0.00014795244,0.000019832294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004669001,0.00010690201,0.91553056,0.000007916164,0.00040187186,0.0000031484824,0.008524833,0.0006556928,0.000016232116,0.07397652,0.00015866183,0.0006129903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025409035,0.00007797699,0.8947518,0.0000068938693,0.000187926,2.024515e-7,0.06405522,0.00038684745,0.000014001263,0.0007467716,0.03923845,0.00027981383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2626074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4139935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15138613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000503987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048667673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74230295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W104706969","doi":"10.1086/719732","title":"Mother’s Time Allocation, Child Care and Child Cognitive Development","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Human Capital","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; Collegio Carlo Alberto; York University","keywords":"Child care; Time allocation; Cognition; Productivity; Child development; Cognitive development; Psychology; Paternal care; Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Medicine; Economics; Nursing; Economic growth; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.014038060586379793,"score_gpt":0.27551968021855266,"score_spread":0.26148161963217287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W104706969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.955071,0.0046542217,0.00004138264,0.00031011758,0.0006837273,0.0002860636,0.00005332923,0.00002124708,0.03887894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99709684,0.0006699925,0.0003025215,0.00017930729,0.00071237085,0.000008918444,0.00008199205,0.00002925785,0.00091881386],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806523,0.00018598059,0.00050311245,0.00025040592,0.0007396761,0.00025560436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854225,0.000043197095,0.0006146204,0.00011605158,0.0005070092,0.00017686345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006012931,0.00021549559,0.00035340438,0.0002045814,0.0012361963,0.00016906868,0.00040776437,0.00018178155,0.00057855796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006707635,0.00021864322,0.00014528239,0.00008132001,0.00019859635,0.00012099929,0.000297243,0.0009320142,0.000011029938],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003457585,0.0002794385,0.023645742,0.00019134898,0.0006642881,0.000086582666,0.9660159,0.00018467117,0.000017506805,0.005231945,0.000962411,0.0026855955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018315434,0.00053909665,0.3332256,0.0009860414,0.0003827917,0.00008818004,0.633879,0.000013887763,0.000026936705,0.005942637,0.021856466,0.0012278026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014158431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004576894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33213687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040358523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073035294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95079476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W105088709","doi":"10.18584/iipj.2013.4.1.9","title":"The Socio-Economic Characteristics of First Nation Teen Mothers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Indigenous Policy Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Aboriginal Affairs Northern Dev Canada; Statistics Canada","funders":"Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada","keywords":"Census; Indigenous; Cohort; Socioeconomic status; Geography; Socioeconomics; Demography; Medicine; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.023838269982370597,"score_gpt":0.2967967989636884,"score_spread":0.2729585289813178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W105088709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96762085,0.00004742002,0.0002475087,0.007224705,0.0013731599,0.00018041521,0.000048658578,0.000016766493,0.023240533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99333537,0.0013897603,0.00009938675,0.000261712,0.002241893,0.000008196124,0.0000065731174,0.000013765395,0.002643371],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987403,0.00007889985,0.00038910337,0.00008937372,0.0003894345,0.00031287412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987821,0.00021952357,0.00041370743,0.000093987146,0.00038075243,0.00010994826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058840937,0.000091290756,0.000109794695,0.000155917,0.0012307401,0.00033340015,0.0006542151,0.00008952289,0.00022701897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023582962,0.00007374209,0.00010116989,0.00007875433,0.00024525714,0.00028232124,0.00003226431,0.0001965552,0.00010944334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022798547,0.00015860426,0.6097876,0.000007713145,0.00046622354,0.0000047809294,0.20963056,0.00022817394,0.00016148343,0.14788082,0.00481452,0.026836747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072240306,0.0001068404,0.71264714,0.000035301364,0.00002823884,0.00005911337,0.052673932,0.0010536696,0.000027920953,0.07903902,0.1532111,0.00039532472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014397047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001937001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15695663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008082934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007702036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99216616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W118014008","doi":"10.7202/010149ar","title":"Fécondité et travail féminin en Grèce’: un modèle micro-économique","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014454518179317555,"score_gpt":0.23339252188463236,"score_spread":0.2189380037053148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W118014008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9397661,0.026531585,0.003727295,0.009323371,0.0030373358,0.00066902343,0.00033999002,0.00026059928,0.016344694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9343677,0.038050853,0.008528914,0.008596271,0.00097557995,0.000104561375,0.00009882077,0.00017114231,0.009106116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505043,0.0009280121,0.00080917816,0.0010530009,0.00037511231,0.0017842593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732995,0.00039232936,0.00035218135,0.0007516742,0.00020120782,0.0009726284],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017725026,0.0007526394,0.0007647316,0.0006070894,0.0009475244,0.00023888149,0.0011258428,0.0015984426,0.00019059594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019867734,0.000905742,0.0007690443,0.00228296,0.004215521,0.00059147587,0.0000841721,0.0013414954,0.00021444118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051958705,0.0007385105,0.039558124,0.0001501852,0.00063485134,0.0002481097,0.15548623,0.0015913493,0.002108194,0.7854065,0.0038557013,0.0101703005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061574825,0.0008330757,0.18617466,0.00038166164,0.0010000404,0.00018079829,0.17673261,0.0002295386,0.0013408476,0.24650803,0.3765401,0.0039211353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063634485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12290172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53889847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011795795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020810792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W118247452","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2533736","title":"Marriage Gains: Who Should You Marry ?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Computer science; World Wide Web; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.020092643210033106,"score_gpt":0.28799715868208126,"score_spread":0.26790451547204813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W118247452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73165464,0.0038003263,0.045231797,0.007227965,0.0023060702,0.00034530592,0.00000770799,0.00021533099,0.20921083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696774,0.009219784,0.00013051968,0.00081718474,0.0017289001,0.0000039134525,0.000003247431,0.00003170943,0.018387338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954734,0.0004094258,0.0002874037,0.00024353701,0.0006025188,0.0029837533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917686,0.0000827734,0.000152353,0.00021745457,0.00014053659,0.00023002495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049323547,0.0001775358,0.00022735453,0.00011577299,0.00096407096,0.00016946523,0.00058305496,0.00019300809,0.00010339756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028985576,0.00016512179,0.00016030586,0.00029753096,0.00016186062,0.0002676919,0.00004094049,0.0017188056,0.000081229315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016366108,0.00005024518,0.022169467,0.000004454485,0.000079628335,0.0000034595469,0.0038486375,0.000037326674,0.00008624079,0.9528728,0.00107405,0.019757327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009350067,0.0003016782,0.011561629,0.000027508337,0.0000650138,0.00006200986,0.04466758,0.0005070491,0.0000054939806,0.7868161,0.15453646,0.00051448814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005864109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010083662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23802274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009597113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023979342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74674505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W120280540","doi":"","title":"Farewell to Patriarchy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.02767680652049004,"score_gpt":0.2929412875239104,"score_spread":0.26526448100342037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W120280540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9247134,0.0003474603,0.000058216116,0.0010867189,0.0011137694,0.00025051468,0.000033280106,0.0000543042,0.07234235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98821217,0.00017329329,0.00020471339,0.0042926907,0.00041919955,0.000021053713,0.000001943887,0.0000138038295,0.006661134],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981599,0.000048962225,0.0001690576,0.00023700678,0.00025236286,0.001132752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841815,0.0001328324,0.000028930675,0.00016602676,0.00020985058,0.0010441785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010453936,0.00012610099,0.00019292004,0.00026047003,0.00093328534,0.000044427416,0.00024948164,0.00007426213,0.00007845605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004472758,0.00012992094,0.000039956678,0.0006227004,0.00021007503,0.00006195933,0.000038708826,0.00009833864,0.00019404483],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000149984535,0.000024803918,0.09614919,0.00002775831,0.00020762472,0.00015454278,0.7808641,0.00002150925,0.000025651236,0.10609936,0.010631082,0.00577933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012208644,0.00004188217,0.016364954,0.0000068139293,0.0000067825067,2.9221403e-7,0.70389026,7.0000084e-7,0.0000017880784,0.0058514546,0.2735006,0.00021239312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020065289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7095672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6895019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015210218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059487624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9864602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1203555955","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-46439-7_13","title":"Relevant Irrelevance: The Relevance of Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives in Family Bargaining","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Bargaining problem; Economics; Class (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); Relevance (law); Property (philosophy); Axiom independence; Microeconomics; Argument (complex analysis); Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Game theory; Social choice theory; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.0785210211365463,"score_gpt":0.35607410631128045,"score_spread":0.27755308517473415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1203555955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09322182,0.22880816,0.000023738736,0.0016565481,0.0024360362,0.0015058224,0.00029687423,0.000057082983,0.6719939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86116385,0.124996446,0.00015977844,0.00009473492,0.00023541941,0.00002787285,0.00000680835,0.000043410408,0.013271686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692565,0.00016204092,0.00087818195,0.00056041125,0.0010202838,0.00045340465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712414,0.0010963586,0.00064162235,0.00041445237,0.00064788316,0.00007552014],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017054251,0.00039232508,0.00095290923,0.00023683514,0.00026377084,0.000016816997,0.00063478027,0.00036676228,0.000010700415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014458882,0.00030862758,0.00010441682,0.00022900915,0.0019514853,0.00018272504,0.00036472754,0.0008350293,0.0000022645966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010828866,0.00011048623,0.07514256,0.00095996354,0.000576218,0.0000850388,0.1751298,0.00040750467,0.000040440642,0.729593,0.0010487895,0.016797941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024477008,0.00043576333,0.08476963,0.005841486,0.0002131334,0.000004798466,0.37874457,0.00012837064,0.0000065649197,0.28116244,0.24474157,0.0015039569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020325026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012236207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.767942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025014405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028191277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W126940234","doi":"","title":"Australian labour supply elasticities: Comparison and critical review","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour supply; Economics; Elasticity (physics); Wage; Population; Price elasticity of supply; Labour economics; Econometrics; Price elasticity of demand; Demographic economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.08001651064690686,"score_gpt":0.40762431243913166,"score_spread":0.3276078017922248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W126940234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.683716,0.01149752,0.000038151797,0.0087082125,0.002355467,0.002511437,0.0004968509,0.00015949778,0.29051685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67928207,0.3119646,0.0012068865,0.0005821543,0.0005479931,0.00009297921,0.00005654092,0.000052905765,0.006213854],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568635,0.0006921247,0.0008384813,0.00087672926,0.00055202364,0.0013542796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971515,0.0012771345,0.00013363922,0.000596899,0.0003032103,0.00053764245],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005076034,0.00031774255,0.00080360536,0.00035246115,0.0004796152,0.00030634803,0.0007747833,0.00071013893,0.0002946113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024294043,0.00036518284,0.00013818797,0.0002224606,0.001698414,0.00012400826,0.00066809746,0.0022426373,0.000018873421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012738709,0.00088425475,0.56539005,0.013130258,0.00023405385,0.00025403325,0.030557282,0.0013070074,0.000020702522,0.19259925,0.0055902563,0.18990548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009115058,0.00025176446,0.18980315,0.006813736,0.00009675251,0.000013078724,0.07999615,0.0021408177,0.0000062059703,0.02259358,0.6954037,0.0019695556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001537238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056475727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68981344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091679976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001147145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W133508776","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01672.x","title":"Assessing the impact of a wage subsidy for single parents on social assistance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Duration (music); Social assistance; Wage; Economics; Population; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Public assistance; Economic growth; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.2836521747668997,"score_gpt":0.2729596781066177,"score_spread":0.010692496660281992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W133508776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99077255,0.00006316334,0.00008673761,0.00034325884,0.0010620867,0.00027365107,0.00024097656,0.0000039680335,0.0071536135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987915,0.000027989316,0.00025579965,0.00015976159,0.00060417905,0.000009220611,0.000006262944,0.000033703494,0.00011154201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982521,0.00013495694,0.00064165186,0.0002157017,0.000006082908,0.00074949337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975412,0.0002178577,0.0008415112,0.00021980847,0.00031786735,0.00086175045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011964005,0.00020134695,0.00046089603,0.00028494772,0.0006263987,0.00017107013,0.00067816104,0.00018528612,0.000084724525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029625106,0.00018964129,0.00041261024,0.0001384745,0.00039162242,0.00045099968,0.000008772083,0.00023905923,0.0000021847295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018419624,0.00013487578,0.20966189,0.000043525775,0.0006229386,0.00006882817,0.08761855,0.001740107,0.0001061026,0.6924557,0.0014501018,0.005913166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030275977,0.0020807448,0.5678277,0.00030670007,0.00028851896,0.00010032355,0.10150092,0.0014185286,0.00020999648,0.3129502,0.008688526,0.0016002608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35184082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9718275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61998665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027940096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045546214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8079703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480148185","doi":"","title":"Reclaiming the Future: Women's Strategies for the 21st Century","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.021903152813236623,"score_gpt":0.2652446199881118,"score_spread":0.24334146717487515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480148185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9233471,0.009725795,0.000006576375,0.010716199,0.0028733816,0.0009653658,0.00012556772,0.00008993131,0.052150078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709043,0.016160075,0.000029980196,0.0051594204,0.0016110984,0.0005492094,0.0000036106424,0.000024199833,0.005558116],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979584,0.00014682939,0.00018569102,0.00025953545,0.0002533937,0.0011961159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871016,0.0004872463,0.000052096097,0.00029259163,0.00015360965,0.0003042749],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010462445,0.0001939019,0.00021720184,0.00006015605,0.004898269,0.00025579857,0.00054976746,0.00009010761,0.00028965285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010141999,0.000121054385,0.000073111696,0.00042054738,0.00067975774,0.0001710069,0.000023753804,0.00017779531,0.000028166089],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020944255,0.000014177278,0.0006139961,0.000029577091,0.00036659828,0.0000059313543,0.66015226,0.000095108924,0.0000019396928,0.308772,0.0038097799,0.026117692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083104984,0.000019255142,0.00071817305,0.0000036151748,0.000011084318,3.0684654e-7,0.5639677,0.000007914359,5.6333175e-8,0.010301246,0.4247838,0.000103742444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030607744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2139728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42097402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011416473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011187973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480681192","doi":"","title":"The Welfare Enigma: Explaining the Dramatic Decline in Canadians' Use of Social Assistance, 1993-2005","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"C.D. Howe Institute Commentary","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Welfare dependency; Social Welfare; Dependency (UML); Demographic economics; Economics; Drop out; Development economics; Public economics; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.03887215230271352,"score_gpt":0.27737503746906894,"score_spread":0.23850288516635543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480681192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89466316,0.00041772198,0.00015211802,0.09836744,0.0014134396,0.00042862192,0.00009451313,0.000036918038,0.004426095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908226,0.0007790334,0.00034605403,0.0071904277,0.00027535215,0.000028180508,0.000050636223,0.000014661172,0.0004930487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980533,0.00028976347,0.00042923028,0.00019844322,0.00045457977,0.000574672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901336,0.00032126062,0.00016701584,0.0003033306,0.00007217252,0.00012287946],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074758823,0.00016827541,0.00023757546,0.00008082485,0.0032424245,0.00008795524,0.00069742027,0.000104676656,0.000029013649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014197297,0.00012390337,0.000098975106,0.00047843665,0.001057411,0.00041909088,0.0001144849,0.00032026804,0.0000039618676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001323358,0.00043022682,0.41261598,0.000053412994,0.00024578313,0.000273581,0.23385255,0.001098046,0.000027768967,0.14104496,0.20238873,0.007836618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049618393,0.000015058128,0.096075095,0.000026165822,0.000020534613,0.0000031490513,0.04523782,0.0002450657,0.0000018512694,0.00035520887,0.8573394,0.00018451193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10658305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67677075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6549506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005010851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004425589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480831129","doi":"10.7202/010171ar","title":"Le bien-être économique des enfants au Canada : changements et conséquences pour les politiques sociales","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03379199833743781,"score_gpt":0.27123026161404157,"score_spread":0.23743826327660375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480831129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92565423,0.015127675,0.0004897758,0.015887614,0.0016849778,0.000450957,0.0005774286,0.00013709096,0.039990246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96887594,0.02198797,0.0013822312,0.0046839886,0.0008556779,0.00006328474,0.000051397114,0.000069034926,0.0020304832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958397,0.00073029054,0.0005715173,0.0007058624,0.00039613555,0.001756452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978833,0.00033174027,0.00035204357,0.00034537056,0.0003473652,0.0007401715],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009455264,0.0005677756,0.00058665033,0.00037997955,0.0022457188,0.00017619539,0.00077147986,0.0007228748,0.00006422519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029313067,0.00067296956,0.00033983198,0.0013273939,0.007757197,0.0005242237,0.00007634282,0.0006059796,0.000010428791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011236012,0.00017558916,0.28847563,0.00012788243,0.00027287749,0.000086605316,0.04363279,0.00012763226,0.00004017061,0.6617889,0.0017172074,0.0035435033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015728199,0.00018237797,0.28500977,0.00053048134,0.00025813392,0.000029627136,0.34910452,0.000028354652,0.00020751706,0.2929379,0.068515375,0.0016231298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36885098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034135166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03466905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481206788","doi":"10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.11.004","title":"Suicide and property rights in India","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Development Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Wife; Property (philosophy); Domestic violence; Demographic economics; State (computer science); Political science; Suicide prevention; Socioeconomics; Poison control; Economics; Medicine; Law; Environmental health","score_opus":0.016746114239978793,"score_gpt":0.23845402948505123,"score_spread":0.22170791524507244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481206788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819436,0.000047324516,0.00011253985,0.0002448775,0.0003341475,0.0000603526,3.7582757e-7,0.0000037101859,0.017253041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992937,0.00030903486,0.005955497,0.00021037363,0.00011926519,8.705319e-7,5.540959e-7,0.0000044586836,0.00046291758],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919647,0.000059485355,0.00039545383,0.00008577679,0.000078772166,0.00018404413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995163,0.000054778353,0.00021289125,0.00004675098,0.00005536094,0.000113939655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011752137,0.00007130187,0.0001807312,0.00013010367,0.00014077028,0.00006031997,0.00015450966,0.00006986726,0.000012952033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052588024,0.00005222229,0.000022854541,0.00006281397,0.000061108665,0.00022015563,0.000024447912,0.00012174546,0.00000631385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022533939,0.000072338626,0.92219096,0.000011255921,0.000041138443,0.0000076279243,0.026095573,0.00009062565,0.000015941087,0.035129663,0.00023643581,0.016085895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058050745,0.000032230542,0.82992727,0.00003438376,0.0000051766096,0.00000764464,0.0017875724,0.00011831275,0.00003231316,0.0076877046,0.15962832,0.00015856128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014188982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022717263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1593919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019518731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045212384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21295632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481417842","doi":"10.1007/978-90-481-3377-2_18","title":"Canadian Policies for Families with Very Young Children in International Perspective","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Welfare; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.011166464028316635,"score_gpt":0.2526897775507035,"score_spread":0.24152331352238685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481417842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027141352,0.00012849823,0.000040389343,0.0021353296,0.00029768073,0.00047958366,0.00025567558,0.00003885434,0.99390984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13584866,0.0010922267,0.00052241987,0.0012867844,0.0006922715,0.00001570539,0.00015550929,0.000037966038,0.86034846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890274,0.000010334517,0.00014778865,0.000289386,0.00029862346,0.00035112145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936813,0.000036001726,0.000063530206,0.00011786485,0.00026963113,0.00014482836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013441459,0.00020307787,0.0002110555,0.0004340401,0.00022882524,0.000097754324,0.00032742988,0.00026035405,0.00010731189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029157858,0.00018914246,0.000078492485,0.00005436586,0.00018556832,0.000113694696,0.00001522625,0.00018236192,0.000010196562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008898457,0.0000070104097,0.019521011,0.0000012030018,0.00006579214,0.0000032585042,0.018851753,0.000014917417,8.6494126e-8,0.9603521,0.0006905089,0.00048343715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011962702,0.00023959299,0.3061016,0.00016467735,0.00010722881,0.000009959343,0.20384802,0.00006882234,4.856371e-7,0.27164167,0.21503548,0.0015862127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.825989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68871045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001739547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013096178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77130055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482650144","doi":"","title":"Using a Canadian-American Natural Experiment to Study Relative Efficiencies of Social Welfare Payment Systems","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de recherche","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Payment; Economics; Natural experiment; Distribution (mathematics); Social Welfare; Demographic economics; Deadweight loss; Transfer payment; Labour economics; Public economics; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.16662525086489582,"score_gpt":0.3857543862809064,"score_spread":0.2191291354160106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482650144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821238,0.0004235129,0.0006062818,0.0008194743,0.0003619683,0.00066733157,0.000015117202,0.000034706718,0.014947796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956919,0.000019192305,0.0022814146,0.00014967624,0.00006648482,0.000031428397,0.0000011128891,0.000015446365,0.0017433295],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695206,0.0016518738,0.00022599321,0.00024753337,0.00038572517,0.0005368375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990986,0.00018757525,0.00010942444,0.0001450557,0.0001645043,0.00029481322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019628105,0.00014198544,0.00025926804,0.00014933266,0.0007673695,0.00005358873,0.00028083634,0.00024024193,0.000041065992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052099343,0.00014118313,0.00007251838,0.00096236664,0.00042429616,0.0000700581,0.000023482804,0.00049307995,0.0000055506184],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000764269,0.00015642129,0.005067513,0.000008693441,0.00009201017,0.000013798505,0.9748828,0.0002081983,0.00055788294,0.017410608,0.00014777921,0.0014466489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023702679,0.00014414809,0.007696732,0.000010071538,0.00004402645,0.0000011551962,0.9861032,0.0012804149,0.000056110133,0.00007402165,0.0041003856,0.00025270515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1328146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026369767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10644483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005289588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036619566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99852896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483962534","doi":"10.7202/039576ar","title":"Trev Lynn Broughton and Helen Rogers, eds. Gender and Fatherhood in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. ISBN:1-4039-9515-X. Price: US$28.95 (paperback), $84.00 (hardcover)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Art history; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.01828317795036184,"score_gpt":0.24724792509993399,"score_spread":0.22896474714957216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483962534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8618041,0.0680179,0.00012603206,0.0066373525,0.0023988741,0.0022193957,0.00014607103,0.00018225888,0.058468014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93812495,0.05649926,0.0001581877,0.0036606812,0.0011830463,0.00000916578,0.000023859178,0.00003230015,0.0003085257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970157,0.00041961126,0.00040817593,0.00063395145,0.00067647273,0.00084604823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867326,0.0003419045,0.00017892328,0.0004795502,0.000046176818,0.00028021345],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090346474,0.00044562464,0.000438061,0.000057124853,0.00069925067,0.00040595894,0.0005290854,0.00033039757,0.00011250345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007273505,0.000293274,0.00009254999,0.00040914156,0.00022917797,0.00008256588,0.00008063538,0.0004112569,0.000018250377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002795739,0.00029411868,0.03867879,0.00008849277,0.0002687038,0.000101361155,0.15414749,0.000029617016,0.0009637213,0.7425144,0.051589288,0.011044472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034798838,0.000751852,0.51558965,0.00014548152,0.000245737,0.000038966224,0.031126255,0.00054323673,0.00003183866,0.08951262,0.35726818,0.001266251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010778727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028469256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6530017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005474258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012958204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484340775","doi":"10.21991/c91958","title":"ITS ALL IN THE FAMILY: CHILD SUPPORT, TAX AND THIBAUDEAU","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.051600167727814034,"score_gpt":0.2809020562185577,"score_spread":0.22930188849074365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484340775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07274663,0.0025353066,0.0103359055,0.011153463,0.0028130175,0.0015466979,0.00050227466,0.00023026211,0.89813644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99147385,0.00068466115,0.0005068652,0.0065963278,0.00015638566,0.00008712797,0.000064923806,0.000009337741,0.00042054686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970959,0.00021912172,0.00052014994,0.0005230693,0.00065836334,0.0009834325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989193,0.00013319106,0.00015382032,0.00032985787,0.00021241339,0.00025141996],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011265523,0.00031742427,0.0002978987,0.00023516128,0.0020563414,0.00014038969,0.000643081,0.0002983966,0.00021337021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033338438,0.00026610543,0.00014198759,0.0005171733,0.006453844,0.0007606559,0.00014606405,0.00046047545,0.00017258439],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015499443,0.00013979709,0.053557854,0.000009530922,0.00003444199,0.00005020043,0.004593814,0.000031190386,0.000016908753,0.93715215,0.0041755834,0.00022305292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002508079,0.00014951851,0.092419155,0.00015042203,0.00013110886,0.00036667156,0.10025341,0.00037110448,0.000019782228,0.084062286,0.7184085,0.0011599122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013827076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042814035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9187272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016054466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014517969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487664645","doi":"10.1177/0891243215584761","title":"Gay Pay for Straight Work","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gender & Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Occupational segregation; Demographic economics; Wage; Public sector; Psychology; Labour economics; Gender studies; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.090603080160753,"score_gpt":0.3236893382089471,"score_spread":0.23308625804819408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487664645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.416954,0.004170776,0.18039525,0.010367018,0.013028576,0.0033809184,0.00032608444,0.001454989,0.36992237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96468437,0.0002782162,0.01685764,0.0019409129,0.0013824911,0.000056691402,0.000039699895,0.000035195764,0.014724807],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843377,0.00007727091,0.00017508047,0.00029653264,0.00043808366,0.0005792696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990991,0.00008223843,0.00006467711,0.00021915439,0.00023596745,0.00029887748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010111729,0.00014086688,0.00016135813,0.000011576287,0.0005032842,0.00009739515,0.00029888997,0.0002210735,0.00007580478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000715388,0.000115366354,0.00026742407,0.00032223135,0.00016483835,0.00013814826,0.00004121976,0.00015541332,0.00004748418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013288273,0.00011474351,0.044237014,0.00002697265,0.00013261448,0.0000013152486,0.37176722,0.000094651696,0.00003760353,0.029576862,0.5513691,0.0026286205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001034683,0.0000416921,0.032012418,0.0000066208163,0.000054760796,5.315076e-7,0.24889848,0.00021785368,0.000010088462,0.027117759,0.69013596,0.00046918693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012608354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017091137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5477303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020227987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005570152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47045034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488095202","doi":"10.1177/001979390806100308","title":"Are Two Carrots Better Than One? The Effects of Adding Employment Services to Financial Incentive Programs for Welfare Recipients","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Labor Relations Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Earnings; Incentive; Welfare; Poverty; Business; Labour economics; Wage; Social Welfare; Demographic economics; Economics; Finance; Economic growth; Accounting","score_opus":0.05366364504482288,"score_gpt":0.307418284774684,"score_spread":0.2537546397298611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488095202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97612596,0.012141023,0.000024264284,0.0064720726,0.00075281045,0.0039533246,0.0001354304,0.000030885963,0.00036423313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99072003,0.006038218,0.00031742378,0.00096978707,0.0005753514,0.000537615,0.000051313902,0.000015732505,0.0007745033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986978,0.00022940067,0.00032106717,0.00021620927,0.0002888592,0.0002466625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990503,0.00017370818,0.00026611748,0.0001539876,0.00025292175,0.00010294606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040172497,0.00012735296,0.0003010296,0.00004268627,0.0009063767,0.000029510513,0.00019327502,0.00012502189,0.000018159039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047494806,0.00009452856,0.00008955074,0.0006600638,0.000115721115,0.0001204105,0.00005179316,0.00016616395,0.0000053269455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004321196,0.0002279579,0.89233243,0.0007295304,0.000115047966,0.0000041862777,0.014048429,0.0000091667835,0.000008198661,0.011768476,0.003355979,0.0773574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013034237,0.00018164284,0.39440936,0.0059418557,0.00030265955,7.889655e-7,0.001480292,0.000007427317,0.0000067907363,0.00039444506,0.5956774,0.00029395503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083361927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016882505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5923214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006311791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011555488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6971208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488139815","doi":"","title":"Mariage, maternite et remuneration: le choix du moment importe-t-il?","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Remuneration; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.039560042869681816,"score_gpt":0.313348532875528,"score_spread":0.27378849000584615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488139815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55728424,0.00039437387,0.00006729675,0.010929404,0.003137299,0.0013709721,0.00029424383,0.00008416591,0.426438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6820407,0.16060752,0.0017551174,0.00078842853,0.0013284192,0.00041034998,0.00031749223,0.00016050584,0.15259151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99269754,0.0016263698,0.0013969506,0.0016245209,0.0008405074,0.0018141123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967205,0.00053691864,0.00046110057,0.0013840192,0.0003295695,0.00056788523],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062438482,0.00063083525,0.00088090665,0.00048629905,0.0010074873,0.00073858234,0.0014714327,0.0010862859,0.0011816319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029061214,0.0007568155,0.00035449478,0.00045586567,0.0012086383,0.0004637572,0.0013364003,0.0024122307,0.00022584123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000195189,0.0026168593,0.2984687,0.0007570168,0.000851853,0.0005186244,0.046873838,0.10658021,0.0003386558,0.36112642,0.0040515843,0.17762104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015238731,0.00018892362,0.08678048,0.00020982402,0.000027128724,0.000022107346,0.015335373,0.064573176,0.00001594143,0.0090061575,0.82090294,0.001414089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068297037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013568581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8168513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002850213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001752912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489467266","doi":"","title":"Provisioning: Thinking About All of Women's Work","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Provisioning; Work (physics); Psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Telecommunications; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.022650764012371476,"score_gpt":0.2737781169090432,"score_spread":0.2511273528966717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489467266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831941,0.0008296158,0.000010421087,0.00073750207,0.0006966625,0.00025370202,0.000013312892,0.000059817212,0.014204872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958342,0.0004390048,0.00036984478,0.0016606143,0.00017527396,0.000072682924,0.0000025359213,0.000020521253,0.0014253599],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763525,0.000071623916,0.00027337312,0.0002929738,0.00040962652,0.001317134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986453,0.000096820826,0.00011723101,0.00022621982,0.0002451861,0.0006692195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009139116,0.0001853415,0.00036764494,0.00021572497,0.0009499992,0.00006939383,0.00039223855,0.000113944094,0.000051537834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000458234,0.00018229488,0.000059703787,0.00066668,0.00051694876,0.0001417887,0.00006207363,0.00016287688,0.00002636225],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007230219,0.000029867162,0.022792311,0.000044034834,0.00023628748,0.000030729956,0.8607799,0.00021510894,0.000008348482,0.11513118,0.00021625494,0.0005087449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042148496,0.000088996654,0.011937959,0.00010013754,0.000016871987,4.2677152e-7,0.8827053,8.8725113e-7,0.0000032307162,0.07512052,0.029274318,0.00032986215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009032677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07827013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06923745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041622953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016617429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489527438","doi":"10.1007/bf03405206","title":"Economic Gains of a Home Fortification Program","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Public Health","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Toronto; SickKids Foundation; Ministry of Health and Long Term Care; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Fortification; Business; Food science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.06605119123471774,"score_gpt":0.33189645512671756,"score_spread":0.2658452638919998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489527438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9780521,0.0007809516,0.00068305404,0.013164403,0.0006586084,0.00021037608,0.000041193434,0.000009954181,0.0063993772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979578,0.00014485698,0.00096317,0.0003040383,0.00035552066,0.0000023887549,0.0000095987725,0.000007703996,0.00025490252],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985997,0.00016564596,0.0004956404,0.00007918977,0.00014815699,0.0005116701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813664,0.000030294364,0.00045938455,0.00010379107,0.00023332026,0.0010365875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022173245,0.00005783876,0.00017883048,0.00030897747,0.00027104098,0.00009190207,0.00024573944,0.0000672074,0.000064236476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009312512,0.000059874914,0.000068846035,0.00023918462,0.00018230367,0.00022996603,0.0000025708832,0.000116506264,0.000004639657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017913337,0.0000854396,0.59512645,0.000038353617,0.000027347956,0.0000074342206,0.016219579,0.00010158582,0.0000034788977,0.2519686,0.01928779,0.11713214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024716376,0.00018415897,0.5552495,0.000015245512,0.0000046462287,0.000007366552,0.01386807,0.0001275561,3.975904e-7,0.0041452437,0.42604867,0.00010195925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17694281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77731395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6003711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011126394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020867618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98468316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490141975","doi":"","title":"Pacifying Monogamy: The Mystery Revisited ∗","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2008 Meeting Papers","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ruler; Polygyny; Economic shortage; Wife; Subject (documents); Population; Phenomenon; Sociology; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Demography; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023267527370269832,"score_gpt":0.2816657951640924,"score_spread":0.2583982677938226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490141975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44518992,0.0006614779,0.00014543366,0.0007224544,0.0005513963,0.00019617802,0.0000025868521,0.00015281628,0.55237776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937247,0.0004179145,0.00069467287,0.0012521029,0.00049286144,0.0000033086658,0.0000038476696,0.00001781825,0.0033927537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984188,0.00017356081,0.00023521254,0.00022017278,0.00039617997,0.0005560519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991096,0.00035967003,0.00010420923,0.00022859208,0.0000740125,0.00012389678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026001574,0.00011997407,0.00013179152,0.000054117136,0.0010769719,0.00008835973,0.0003003796,0.000115775576,0.000051613348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042082055,0.00009254279,0.000087784,0.00045576927,0.00020318484,0.000076849035,0.000037145703,0.00018655439,0.000055455443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052504944,0.00009161574,0.67681456,0.00007466061,0.0001381969,0.00008709675,0.24714454,0.00031922237,0.008662078,0.021909807,0.010291531,0.03441418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045475268,0.000034503133,0.14167692,0.0001568434,0.00006191986,0.0000055696396,0.27586558,0.00019667909,0.00008064933,0.00039330267,0.58049107,0.00058222504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008455781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011033956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57019955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102727994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007917546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8283305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490256597","doi":"10.2307/20460675","title":"Differences That Matter: Social Policy and the Working Poor in the United States and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Social policy; Political science; Political economy; Social science; Demographic economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.030653945032085635,"score_gpt":0.2702010851044494,"score_spread":0.23954714007236377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490256597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9061835,0.0005272972,0.0000080675,0.09169017,0.00018990586,0.000075793345,0.0000062522336,0.0000010114366,0.0013180067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867667,0.0003600741,0.0000051815227,0.012339319,0.00044880796,7.715935e-7,0.0000012041178,0.000004089393,0.00007385781],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852115,0.00068228133,0.00017749036,0.000060261682,0.00015521345,0.00040362045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986811,0.0009316474,0.00015005603,0.000049337177,0.000055627934,0.00013218402],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026553953,0.000076542274,0.00015983901,0.00011058944,0.0013751909,0.0000808841,0.00038124406,0.00008920226,0.0000115722305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012775838,0.00003795515,0.000026472851,0.0001734635,0.002391422,0.00003107908,0.000012980651,0.0003756821,2.556118e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015675425,0.0000018453092,0.6953025,0.0000017801884,0.000030590774,0.00002373804,0.24947304,0.000003801885,4.918546e-7,0.053222775,0.0014967914,0.0004269715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002706768,0.000009842421,0.7414903,0.0000051281622,0.000013623869,0.000018195815,0.23055899,0.000008944191,7.471823e-8,0.02146532,0.0061101327,0.000048759975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98839587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0805832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023985819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019721051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490724436","doi":"","title":"Legislation canadienne de l'ecole obligatoire et incidence sur les annees de scolarite et le futur revenu du travail","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028192545075747814,"score_gpt":0.2945848562885913,"score_spread":0.2663923112128435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490724436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94359803,0.00186919,0.00008034471,0.008779657,0.00067327026,0.0008662084,0.00022676233,0.000054362732,0.04385215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91304195,0.074676506,0.0024394824,0.0005879151,0.00072783907,0.00016137926,0.00009634746,0.00008482998,0.008183762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99259967,0.0024841477,0.0009316252,0.0012256386,0.00045405352,0.0023048774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965029,0.0010460888,0.00038979854,0.000833759,0.0004304502,0.0007970224],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013151285,0.0004981377,0.00070107053,0.00045671637,0.0010849925,0.00047014648,0.0013999585,0.001150175,0.00009367251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018550777,0.0006525482,0.00026445396,0.00052366994,0.0012194,0.0007170777,0.00058747194,0.0026096492,0.00001756672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009258238,0.0005152916,0.5296847,0.00025121315,0.00016750919,0.00011784792,0.06738992,0.12205658,0.00034852742,0.095278434,0.00047429433,0.18362309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079235365,0.00011496317,0.75120103,0.0005326626,0.000023892318,0.000028257584,0.04855024,0.04363172,0.000015878102,0.0052455314,0.14894576,0.00091769313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24476147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88559175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64083034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062135668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010732037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491322948","doi":"","title":"The Québec's Experiment of $5 per Day per Child Childcare Policy and Mother's Labour Supply: Evidence Based on the Five Cycles of the NLSCY","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Demographic economics; Child care; Christian ministry; Labour supply; Government (linguistics); Day care; Economics; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Geography; Socioeconomics; Demography; Labour economics; Sociology; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.027623041985969817,"score_gpt":0.3302874035049791,"score_spread":0.3026643615190093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491322948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93091965,0.0020596941,0.0000010323578,0.027938806,0.00022910506,0.001372262,0.00017092054,0.00001429514,0.037294246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96452516,0.032599855,0.000055844153,0.0005165617,0.00038499807,0.00013478567,0.0000032300613,0.000037570993,0.0017419877],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614555,0.0014237362,0.00052497163,0.00058540027,0.0006584876,0.00066185306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529356,0.0027175369,0.00031556867,0.0013256718,0.00021961636,0.0001280459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036717863,0.0002786225,0.00038915552,0.00017232541,0.0010488834,0.00017019332,0.0018043958,0.0003044545,0.00009738633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018595321,0.00016717748,0.00023339156,0.00017582618,0.002167556,0.00008619206,0.0008319514,0.0011371694,0.0000022984975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043446073,0.00086937,0.38448623,0.00039502743,0.0005615473,0.0000038057235,0.29662833,0.06345739,0.00046388176,0.13756497,0.0004555953,0.11467942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007288296,0.00017787557,0.79621786,0.0013709918,0.000031293035,0.0000016566422,0.15132162,0.006728694,0.00037887722,0.0028202576,0.039515235,0.0007068217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033731543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04255606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41173163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009747358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002908882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9749148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491758970","doi":"10.4324/9780203884034-18","title":"Women’s Migration, Social Reproduction and Care","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reproduction; Social reproduction; Sociology; Biology; Ecology; Social science; Social capital","score_opus":0.021978655358192607,"score_gpt":0.2559631468116842,"score_spread":0.2339844914534916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491758970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068207704,0.00075176946,0.00002883947,0.0014224205,0.00050956395,0.00021920953,0.000016922018,0.00012303957,0.9901075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03445305,0.0020246336,0.00014778577,0.00028792347,0.0018801393,0.0000069587136,0.000052413547,0.000019472733,0.96112764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988945,0.00002335049,0.00016762243,0.00039605048,0.0003043899,0.0002140839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994307,0.000009818048,0.00009458145,0.00014642984,0.00024095108,0.00007750171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022056152,0.00015635362,0.0001858998,0.00007181759,0.0006276884,0.00008527097,0.000090624584,0.00037820605,0.00025384742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023249719,0.00016142153,0.000052242816,0.000031725704,0.00018326778,0.00009225998,0.000017014643,0.00016047266,0.000024878836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000599946,0.00000785248,0.00034713565,0.000022216253,0.00002638416,0.0000022658014,0.20922698,7.868267e-7,0.0000038583894,0.73049104,0.010374883,0.049490612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008256436,0.000031821422,0.0020286778,0.0000070131427,0.000021300388,5.5713923e-7,0.050305724,9.957848e-7,3.8305268e-7,0.0491002,0.8981743,0.00024646986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053662015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069268774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8877994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032382694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018982256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6582579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491775449","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.36.4.583","title":"Post-Familial Families and the Domestic Division of Labour","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Demography; Census; Social class; Racial group; Argument (complex analysis); Marital status; Demographic economics; Sociology; Race (biology); Population; Economics; Medicine; Gender studies","score_opus":0.046359189706317264,"score_gpt":0.36834901590123675,"score_spread":0.3219898261949195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491775449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97202736,0.021526292,0.00025009917,0.0017777579,0.0006019712,0.00019442111,0.000019315528,0.000009573684,0.0035931978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98314196,0.014660966,0.0008032917,0.00044346237,0.0003719097,0.0000029667672,3.2768412e-7,0.0000063292273,0.00056876545],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778867,0.00051949424,0.0006549959,0.00012815124,0.00065667665,0.00025201502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635315,0.0013759827,0.0005782377,0.000120312056,0.0014879906,0.00008429865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015279189,0.00017923383,0.0007569173,0.00014477802,0.0005561327,0.0000439652,0.00031915552,0.00005760662,0.0000042428333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048765604,0.000105868596,0.00015803732,0.00030217707,0.0019352874,0.00029864983,0.000107296,0.0002496184,0.0000041084386],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009601339,0.00037998482,0.07869141,0.00009967669,0.00148267,0.000017157643,0.74445885,0.0016294634,0.0019679521,0.16077782,0.0045324047,0.0050024544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023982301,0.00032209902,0.51129097,0.00009172743,0.00011558291,0.0000056036392,0.4678967,0.00013231309,0.000030184048,0.006009428,0.011538687,0.00016848987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020889517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064049574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43259954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007724458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019262411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7130647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492001302","doi":"10.5325/jafrideve.11.1.0061","title":"Gender Discrimination, Human Capital and Marriage","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Gender discrimination; Economics; Labour economics; Capital (architecture); Gender equality; Demographic economics; Sociology; Gender studies; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.02601670876028287,"score_gpt":0.2807724814340314,"score_spread":0.2547557726737485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492001302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.976606,0.00017377103,0.00062458304,0.0008519089,0.00019958593,0.000062494306,7.955969e-7,0.000009418309,0.021471446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936091,0.00009197115,0.005163956,0.00018274014,0.00015964816,5.6211803e-7,0.0000010011597,0.00000448949,0.00078655727],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887633,0.00006098869,0.000321886,0.0000900196,0.00044514914,0.00020561327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993499,0.000023014092,0.00020195064,0.000051349663,0.00020104999,0.00017276139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067100785,0.00008339081,0.0001427113,0.00012477892,0.00038038855,0.00007537655,0.00015955315,0.0000466581,0.000040043353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054679054,0.00007153932,0.000035174275,0.00013934443,0.000078772726,0.00017776106,0.000017071145,0.00010973756,0.000002441918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024690471,0.00038173638,0.09089839,0.000021332331,0.00013436135,0.0001103845,0.7469925,0.000016268988,0.0013888015,0.12530385,0.004288898,0.030438768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029516043,0.00007500689,0.9142031,0.000013021628,0.000016914202,0.0000111064155,0.05973459,0.000001578892,0.000029081823,0.013330594,0.012148921,0.00014093157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021515212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012874012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8233047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018173947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037059726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29256797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492385259","doi":"10.1787/880242325663","title":"Trends and Determinants of Fertility Rates","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"OECD social employment and migration working papers","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Università degli Studi di Torino; York University","keywords":"Fertility; Total fertility rate; Economics; Macro; Demographic economics; Developing country; Development economics; Demography; Economic growth; Population; Sociology; Family planning; Research methodology","score_opus":0.05432567056255388,"score_gpt":0.3451275265958075,"score_spread":0.2908018560332536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492385259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8556304,0.0022291886,0.0000031429804,0.0006867145,0.0008943771,0.00025981554,0.00004110183,0.00007105935,0.14018418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708352,0.010143264,0.00005902266,0.000075230346,0.0006431815,0.000018029932,0.00006258722,0.000023892208,0.018139608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796027,0.00016324899,0.00044332817,0.00036333964,0.00074172835,0.00032807887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920774,0.00008153539,0.00037849334,0.00010288057,0.00012111137,0.00010822637],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008991643,0.00024666145,0.00046185,0.00015039006,0.0008046844,0.0001222173,0.00012341072,0.00046770374,0.00009841662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005670126,0.00024907055,0.00013454519,0.00017285149,0.00040532913,0.0000712239,0.00004820669,0.0001887112,0.000001482883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022082146,0.00006040207,0.5986768,0.00005992882,0.000071336945,0.0000020750956,0.03432074,7.022532e-7,0.00007481001,0.00035956342,0.0013349545,0.36501664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024662452,0.000030204903,0.6796135,0.000082228325,0.00015107203,5.676493e-7,0.00628673,0.000011648706,0.000009355827,0.000085842075,0.31314588,0.00033640373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045195227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06257821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36468023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020532687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048265868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492625916","doi":"10.7202/600613ar","title":"Nouvelles estimations du coût de l’enfant au Canada","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00998152525219329,"score_gpt":0.2219241647759104,"score_spread":0.2119426395237171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492625916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9479326,0.012080895,0.0028199106,0.005688335,0.003285973,0.00031788196,0.0003032413,0.000116981886,0.027454197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97282547,0.015568153,0.0025464636,0.0029443156,0.0008878929,0.00004032293,0.000048428523,0.000057134406,0.005081812],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640757,0.00037912096,0.0004973242,0.00051137066,0.000660443,0.0015441851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976601,0.0004500573,0.00021815072,0.00045086976,0.00026039523,0.0009604517],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005840494,0.00042229058,0.00043319713,0.0002842354,0.0028386486,0.00005968024,0.0006643318,0.0005721152,0.00012163885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039654836,0.0004951711,0.0003154243,0.0022507187,0.0040475926,0.00022996913,0.000044670265,0.0006286837,0.000023746336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017141372,0.00029882393,0.53713286,0.00010623263,0.00033670475,0.000638031,0.18704037,0.0020406088,0.000063794185,0.16676763,0.10388999,0.0016678235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000709936,0.00010190499,0.3174921,0.00011098466,0.00029932728,0.00020716515,0.10030414,0.0031339265,0.000017682683,0.0023366204,0.5741715,0.0011147113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99668634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4702815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025787707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021072121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494833518","doi":"10.5539/mas.v9n8p29","title":"The Nexus between Female Labour Force Participation (FLFP) and Fertility rate in Selected ASEAN Countries: Panel Cointegration Approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Nexus (standard); Fertility; Total fertility rate; Economics; Panel data; Granger causality; Demographic economics; Causality (physics); Estimation; Labour economics; Econometrics; Demography; Population; Sociology; Research methodology","score_opus":0.06978057098355432,"score_gpt":0.3071877364510844,"score_spread":0.23740716546753005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494833518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9337243,0.000056796423,0.05882827,0.00030226968,0.0000678691,0.00053378154,0.000012249115,0.000065923625,0.006408585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990364,0.000017203405,0.00030552864,0.0001416158,0.00004276363,0.00006248973,0.0000106541465,0.0000075600105,0.00037581072],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786025,0.00018761544,0.00027497555,0.00044359796,0.00064872444,0.00058483507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988642,0.00017886996,0.00011057008,0.00024663482,0.00035777767,0.00024194478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004777884,0.00013232508,0.00017331346,0.00007159588,0.001205891,0.00042873254,0.00042512207,0.00009012148,0.0000013091886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047081528,0.00010340758,0.000012880179,0.0012183012,0.001164896,0.0003647821,0.000069565045,0.0001725723,0.0000065390973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016518116,0.00021026375,0.49808392,0.000043996304,0.000020368267,0.0000015478627,0.3418225,0.0036783465,0.0076361476,0.14252,0.00009652767,0.0057212203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048627428,0.000032200387,0.78353417,0.0000033581073,0.000017712538,1.5235729e-7,0.02968268,0.1553208,0.00015901012,0.030313231,0.00022683146,0.00022357887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010821846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037686392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3121398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028638713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082077464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.927486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495085825","doi":"10.1007/s00181-014-0880-0","title":"Taxes, wages and working hours","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Empirical Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security","funders":"Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Ragnar Söderbergs stiftelse","keywords":"Economics; Taxable income; Endogeneity; Econometrics; Hourly wage; Microsimulation; Wage; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Panel data; Tax rate; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Percentage point; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.04340689920841022,"score_gpt":0.2964219595051713,"score_spread":0.2530150602967611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495085825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93699497,0.00011062281,0.0006198127,0.002362617,0.00044834692,0.000066954584,0.000004707208,0.000053700755,0.059338268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949458,0.00062751886,0.0010448183,0.0019715952,0.00047802491,0.0000031047978,0.0000028849834,0.000012251409,0.0009139997],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920684,0.00008114359,0.00014756642,0.00022114468,0.00005499407,0.00028828764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994423,0.0001838153,0.000055977922,0.00013018186,0.00001661913,0.00017110117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048681596,0.00008904723,0.0001502724,0.000037165722,0.0002954242,0.00012101716,0.00015870774,0.000120927914,0.000028897435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011935445,0.00009312584,0.00004017113,0.00007160144,0.00020499622,0.00009343172,0.000050640247,0.00011097637,0.00003704358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055169257,0.00003186857,0.8808708,0.000004279814,0.000017866534,8.750095e-7,0.0092341555,0.00016909865,0.0000029054618,0.07473518,0.0041101007,0.030817354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033761692,0.000040195686,0.28707397,0.000009105509,0.000016094122,0.0000011875746,0.0052735046,0.002720917,0.0000029390426,0.030774979,0.67340785,0.00034163942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029350095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017301609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66929775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007021037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007090061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37975618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496375687","doi":"","title":"Current Issues Surrounding Poverty and Welfare Programming in Canada: Two Reviews","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"oURspace (University of Regina)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Welfare; Economics; Political science; Public economics; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.023375071894292093,"score_gpt":0.26130684937764287,"score_spread":0.2379317774833508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496375687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6490947,0.0077902763,0.0003336717,0.33988607,0.00040339454,0.0003830894,0.0000061326095,0.000022476634,0.0020802007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9336292,0.041737877,0.006253247,0.000098156896,0.00006630073,9.493096e-7,0.000008269236,0.000019249617,0.018186728],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907184,0.00021206836,0.000016268117,0.00019050227,0.00022183912,0.00028751127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999577,0.000025001624,0.000103306265,0.00011926498,0.00006037985,0.000115091054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051849475,0.00008804995,0.00021911252,0.00007330307,0.00035531644,0.00001827625,0.00015303199,0.00003318589,0.000004958837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007753312,0.000106291795,0.000035661888,0.00037557108,0.00011397829,0.00023212576,0.000029262883,0.00011949893,0.0000011756434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008069389,0.00003359683,0.7752699,0.00015667953,0.000016501699,0.000041836676,0.0143548,0.000018830531,0.000007952923,0.103303835,0.07039258,0.03639536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020726961,0.000008321254,0.013834688,0.00006321027,0.0000120882205,6.314987e-7,0.11407701,0.000022648519,2.2604449e-7,0.000014432689,0.87165415,0.000105299616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4481717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9783089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8012616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047802212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005088409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55550295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497925270","doi":"10.1920/wp.ifs.2006.0610","title":"The social cost-of-living: welfare foundations and estimation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Estimation; Welfare; Social Welfare; Economics; Sociology; Econometrics; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.049900943316743676,"score_gpt":0.37107770415019936,"score_spread":0.3211767608334557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497925270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011676332,0.00036034608,0.0047125625,0.0042150747,0.0030937842,0.0005189896,0.00011386018,0.000027558413,0.9857902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49117407,0.002922663,0.00052623,0.00006598364,0.0007579185,0.000050423852,0.00011639952,0.000023280438,0.504363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989384,0.00013359793,0.00019897595,0.00018102626,0.00031181108,0.00023623415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883527,0.00037661268,0.00029723515,0.00020586936,0.00023030795,0.0000547063],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052788877,0.00012797849,0.0001867743,0.00004113675,0.0059777186,0.00045811466,0.00039864652,0.0002927409,0.0005579499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005789636,0.00009913686,0.000065905835,0.000075896176,0.0007519009,0.0001443439,0.00007831731,0.00016794425,0.00016267481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057035127,0.000055742326,0.0010915074,0.00008971769,0.00013040482,4.122921e-7,0.041956086,0.000060947445,0.0000024711558,0.552606,0.34810635,0.055894654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006204804,0.000012512144,0.015999531,0.000049068047,0.000050791587,2.2622106e-7,0.021717051,0.0008041281,1.9007348e-7,0.0013434753,0.9597435,0.000217469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029893208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00837339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6116372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000752691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041613946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499157329","doi":"","title":"Income Instability of Lone Parents, Singles and Two-Parent Families in Canada, 1984 to 2004","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Demographic economics; Government (linguistics); Instability; Economics; Labour economics; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.03777603521105575,"score_gpt":0.33082847993614706,"score_spread":0.2930524447250913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499157329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97578084,0.0003809469,0.000005317735,0.00019693671,0.0004944659,0.00087366876,0.00019686083,0.000013070456,0.022057883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99059826,0.008502551,0.00051935914,0.00006343691,0.00007978035,0.000056051555,0.00002810325,0.000027007507,0.00012544391],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960595,0.00050604576,0.0009326204,0.0008535718,0.00060069247,0.0010476027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977033,0.00069298584,0.00018717466,0.0006931421,0.0003224951,0.0004008592],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036096945,0.00028340376,0.0006964493,0.0006294125,0.00019832289,0.00008247281,0.00076252443,0.0003087361,0.000018428384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012389232,0.0003310859,0.000059582406,0.0005456775,0.0006947276,0.000088820394,0.0010419209,0.0010677886,9.670113e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060188333,0.00011969789,0.9362822,0.0001578961,0.000026633383,0.000015484482,0.009054508,0.012503174,0.000015516844,0.00069370866,0.000008634168,0.041062355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005577596,0.00005005389,0.9128724,0.0002641134,0.0000054377283,5.745463e-7,0.080154955,0.0009418725,0.000017739749,0.002356251,0.0023162921,0.0004625604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92313844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99622077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07308233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006182104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008768442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499528913","doi":"","title":"The Mom Effect: Family Proximity and the Labour Force Status of Women in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Demographic economics; Child care; Parental leave; Work (physics); Labour economics; Daughter; Psychology; Demography; Economics; Medicine; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.020502317162143912,"score_gpt":0.2834209535353818,"score_spread":0.2629186363732379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499528913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9271888,0.0005341719,4.5786953e-7,0.00017135852,0.0003800943,0.0013307297,0.00006816169,0.000007404696,0.07031881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9506273,0.047121443,0.00002425498,0.00006236517,0.000063967265,0.00032272545,0.0000047857693,0.00002321777,0.0017498909],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952182,0.0015734809,0.0005356247,0.00051581394,0.00042826933,0.0017285983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961908,0.0024375308,0.00021648049,0.0007093463,0.00013925563,0.00030660402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009663267,0.00021550887,0.0005518388,0.00012461652,0.00045800337,0.00012456115,0.0010223555,0.00025459795,0.000009050708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017041692,0.00015151862,0.00007009989,0.00019624925,0.0014123047,0.00007421658,0.0008268274,0.0013639174,5.155407e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007032211,0.00007272419,0.7815939,0.00034645846,0.00018442179,0.000017595128,0.07238264,0.0019354861,0.000014782996,0.044971425,0.00003853119,0.09773877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021761127,0.00009457048,0.7906479,0.0001198823,0.000010454194,6.883412e-7,0.14314601,0.0032456843,0.00000881293,0.043877296,0.016194887,0.00047770172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91656697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9739453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09726107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005469031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009593487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501405069","doi":"","title":"Counting on Marilyn Waring: New Advances in Feminist Economics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women's Studies Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Unpaid work; Parliament; Breastfeeding; Sociology; Feminism; Work (physics); Social science; Law; Political science; Gender studies; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.02471871757066973,"score_gpt":0.2991038342628855,"score_spread":0.27438511669221577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501405069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90946597,0.0011649064,0.00011651526,0.0010577849,0.0021630684,0.00008726701,0.0000017654005,0.000030381836,0.085912324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979175,0.015221543,0.00046883852,0.0014996384,0.0015201565,0.000006212288,4.0085544e-7,0.000016517322,0.002091698],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984634,0.000113536255,0.0003540929,0.00020735865,0.00023718763,0.0006244091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991263,0.00027285935,0.00022422241,0.000109436776,0.00007832375,0.00018882775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015930342,0.00015438742,0.00031283448,0.00011714868,0.00095651066,0.0001632963,0.00028465546,0.000067253124,0.00003044503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043904508,0.00014311912,0.000056685465,0.00018180074,0.00019080052,0.00032693634,0.00007393486,0.00033441518,0.000025361624],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010587749,0.00017356864,0.50056434,0.000053325115,0.000202508,0.000025269248,0.28869966,0.0032170585,0.000009047828,0.15596004,0.0023098947,0.048679445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088659424,0.00018293507,0.01624972,0.000070031645,0.000011751009,0.0000064678625,0.348531,0.00015536182,0.0000011272629,0.049191393,0.5843795,0.00033412632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044756332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008894198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5820696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071351026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019875524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73568034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501465332","doi":"","title":"Impact, dans cinq provinces canadiennes, de l'introduction de la prestation nationale pour enfants (PNE) sur les revenus et la consommation de femmes monoparentales","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archipelago (Université du Québec à Montréal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.009992892631010818,"score_gpt":0.23504294267270034,"score_spread":0.22505005004168951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501465332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97423667,0.0031118467,0.014722364,0.004059114,0.00023378019,0.0003241068,0.00017495808,0.00008358632,0.003053604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929758,0.0020183076,0.0018908539,0.00008607554,0.00036871977,0.0000056911,0.00009690658,0.00003223664,0.0025254283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970968,0.0011927913,0.000274186,0.0003837517,0.00034389374,0.00070860883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776757,0.0011844354,0.0002891602,0.00019438023,0.00020767469,0.00035679265],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018647438,0.0002694809,0.00022872248,0.00023953547,0.0008975087,0.00009705864,0.00033866958,0.00025287687,0.000057429777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004303339,0.00032233447,0.00014626695,0.00040391844,0.0006879984,0.00068744924,0.000066647684,0.00033933207,0.00001047527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001063333,0.0003059821,0.46398166,0.00006220022,0.0001275224,0.00011485856,0.43850154,0.00471472,0.0013282973,0.055111833,0.0011624491,0.034482602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058650755,0.000078290985,0.7722768,0.000051801457,0.00012693097,0.00012435984,0.20779607,0.0069968603,0.000037181224,0.006105012,0.00552543,0.00029476878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98600286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30829513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029855228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034490738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501481305","doi":"10.1300/j134v05n04_03","title":"The TANF Co-Residence Requirement for Custodial Teen Parents","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Residence; Liberian dollar; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Economic Justice; Social policy; State (computer science); Political science; Public administration; Economic growth; Business; Law; Economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.04409334017973367,"score_gpt":0.3410455186425987,"score_spread":0.29695217846286504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501481305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92337114,0.0015071101,0.009520772,0.013654328,0.006609735,0.0007499992,0.000047864414,0.00003577997,0.04450325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99055105,0.0026695079,0.0004474153,0.0010240066,0.0013345231,0.0000040902282,0.0000011795278,0.000010020503,0.0039581787],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853754,0.00010467168,0.00034177778,0.000084127925,0.00061620114,0.0003156542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989078,0.00023121574,0.00031408184,0.00011332401,0.00029829287,0.0001352993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001392886,0.00007764728,0.00013730585,0.000032969758,0.00066884444,0.0001125839,0.00042689496,0.00006489216,0.00003254083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042400826,0.00004868073,0.00013379795,0.00012249619,0.00011197241,0.00024006808,0.000018488226,0.00012762577,0.0000092174005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000580342,0.00030669634,0.5509511,0.000018888537,0.00019801388,0.00006314652,0.014990389,0.00018239168,0.0009988813,0.025842436,0.38261098,0.023256736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011019751,0.00026628448,0.094214104,0.00004416178,0.00006143437,0.000013378621,0.016540835,0.00016568847,0.000032791253,0.00950541,0.8778679,0.00018608614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022253624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008943896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49525687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016540632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036925345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51442784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503515412","doi":"10.7202/017749ar","title":"Changements dans la dynamique de la participation des hommes et des femmes au marché du travail au Canada*","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.02443256474536845,"score_gpt":0.2670469987193102,"score_spread":0.24261443397394175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503515412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9624743,0.007596451,0.003048527,0.0012453765,0.00068937417,0.00034394156,0.00019794448,0.00010126195,0.024302816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669672,0.028058695,0.0009260646,0.001194629,0.00033642212,0.00011975152,0.00005244585,0.000070959635,0.0022738194],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944965,0.002263948,0.000464125,0.0005309885,0.00058223313,0.0016622086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769294,0.00075008074,0.00021586956,0.00034260392,0.0002082865,0.0007902243],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019614086,0.0004744732,0.0004299583,0.0003084136,0.0021466915,0.00010613635,0.0005539658,0.0006303905,0.000025474274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051004806,0.0005421741,0.00026768225,0.0016650655,0.009871595,0.00036275774,0.00005788132,0.00058230164,0.0000049379096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002227472,0.0002452242,0.7785408,0.00014408687,0.0001949496,0.0002309274,0.19468702,0.00036504059,0.00007215903,0.01688169,0.0029845196,0.00563134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005196529,0.00010373738,0.90432215,0.00012262678,0.00018531398,0.00005781997,0.0695428,0.0005732596,0.000026206331,0.0027968106,0.021211183,0.0005384153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9714765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1257814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038170312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067956815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507009459","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00082.x","title":"Comparing Public Social Provision and Citizenship in the United States, Canada, and Mexico: Are There Implications for a North American Space?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics &amp Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Parallels; Sanctions; Workforce; Welfare reform; Political science; Social policy; Social rights; Social citizenship; Welfare; Economic growth; Public administration; Sociology; Economics; Human rights; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06381027152122908,"score_gpt":0.33585486387122887,"score_spread":0.2720445923499998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507009459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9720181,0.00003616978,0.00039981873,0.024856795,0.000025887655,0.00035225126,0.00028321552,0.000025338779,0.0020023931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964013,0.00008721186,0.0001822837,0.002807693,0.0002824489,0.000018271821,0.00011504567,0.000014513302,0.00009120801],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986156,0.00012901663,0.00019131454,0.00018114901,0.00018695548,0.00069591653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989478,0.00043437828,0.00012257315,0.00013981436,0.00014811495,0.00020734365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048519197,0.00012017593,0.00016683844,0.00018707823,0.0008806635,0.00015425401,0.00019823831,0.00004616422,3.6558913e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031347558,0.00010487853,0.000021724014,0.00082804775,0.00043749908,0.000041666874,0.00004238536,0.0001432144,2.1928531e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021852738,0.000015511156,0.6728204,0.000011414527,0.000008046736,4.443967e-7,0.015953472,0.0000036189645,9.750513e-7,0.31021243,0.00068647205,0.00028505622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019538215,0.000012665104,0.9340276,0.0000034108866,0.000008884935,0.0000012570815,0.034010116,0.00011110756,2.3750698e-7,0.015486835,0.01601976,0.00012274885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89445364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9886313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2947256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003106776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073486153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6773441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507403859","doi":"","title":"From household's to individual welfare: does the Lorenz criterion still hold? Theory and evidence from French data","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Welfare; Observer (physics); Private good; Public good; Distribution (mathematics); Point (geometry); Test (biology); Household income; Econometrics; Lorenz curve; Demographic economics; Public economics; Microeconomics; Inequality; Economic inequality; Mathematics; Geography; Gini coefficient","score_opus":0.0920397340854758,"score_gpt":0.3587910647084983,"score_spread":0.2667513306230225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507403859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98386115,0.0019693256,0.000031205782,0.0047414145,0.0012955103,0.0010682032,0.0044095144,0.00007275378,0.0025509018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9571469,0.03795883,0.001378847,0.00044406825,0.00186052,0.00011681365,0.00045212038,0.000063743624,0.0005781637],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936599,0.001992006,0.000668668,0.0018513903,0.0008104763,0.0010175535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992952,0.0034994509,0.0002203721,0.0027775958,0.00013392916,0.0004166641],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00828925,0.00041075962,0.00056139164,0.00028969618,0.0007479136,0.0011495848,0.0044571203,0.0006756674,0.0001867036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029309045,0.00032510905,0.000093139446,0.00021962193,0.0012002848,0.00048729175,0.0061605773,0.0019336905,0.000010819174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003196618,0.00033872222,0.20943801,0.0001223409,0.000612151,0.0000710563,0.20308055,0.0049934913,0.00016094012,0.0031666053,0.00157671,0.5761198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005676826,0.00007453243,0.8203254,0.00070883625,0.000096908465,0.0000011692264,0.07315301,0.0020845972,0.000012218482,0.024508707,0.07730475,0.0011622093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03198152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056865815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61088735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062888145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009845723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509055411","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.692142","title":"Career Choice, Marriage-Timing, and the Attraction of Unequals","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Marriage market; Inequality; Fecundity; Differential (mechanical device); Representation (politics); Economics; Demographic economics; Sociology; Political science; Demography; Law","score_opus":0.020801294989156494,"score_gpt":0.2870895231707257,"score_spread":0.2662882281815692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509055411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792552,0.0044575604,0.0019308716,0.003894153,0.00029771193,0.00014891509,0.0000020609448,0.000017375083,0.009996148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845967,0.011404571,0.00006732503,0.00013590042,0.00068326294,0.0000021394922,7.463853e-7,0.000008713897,0.0031006003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981188,0.00024175449,0.00022207368,0.000103359416,0.00033101722,0.0009829933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993828,0.00016174512,0.00018483787,0.00009368673,0.00011385723,0.00006309095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033154173,0.000082208564,0.00014449561,0.000053923104,0.00052586495,0.00005732478,0.000203377,0.00008185474,0.000030829095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017540614,0.000058717498,0.00007571627,0.00015248983,0.00023899022,0.00021001851,0.00001702283,0.00076649385,0.000005121987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007930894,0.00007600336,0.049648494,0.000007632312,0.00022290072,7.3028644e-7,0.021746198,0.00024259786,0.00023201085,0.8502662,0.0003702719,0.07710763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008078508,0.0004202982,0.105054505,0.000060129583,0.00046173407,0.00016692257,0.22552721,0.0013818371,0.00009247969,0.51473165,0.14323649,0.00078823813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014453527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027481262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33553457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035787557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010375184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99026465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510910963","doi":"","title":"THE INCENTIVE EFFECTS OF THE ONTARIO CHILD CARE SUPPLEMENT FOR WORKING FAMILIES ON HOUSEHOLD LABOUR SUPPLY DECISIONS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Census; Labour supply; Labour economics; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Child care; Estimation; Margin (machine learning); Child labour; Economics; Working hours; Substitution effect; Business; Medicine; Nursing; Environmental health; Engineering","score_opus":0.01253788155291845,"score_gpt":0.229979573530658,"score_spread":0.21744169197773955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510910963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688075,0.00039697764,0.000023234516,0.0002196083,0.002513928,0.0016584194,0.00040042418,0.000046014877,0.025933888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715966,0.0016613221,0.00008087862,0.00009917193,0.00018181266,0.000009680085,0.0003709196,0.000033693257,0.025965905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797785,0.00021143619,0.00023796574,0.00041981644,0.00065300136,0.00049994944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802417,0.0007965261,0.00032245123,0.00045580737,0.00029634335,0.00010467732],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018866303,0.0003072024,0.00030940233,0.00023050912,0.002575511,0.00009199081,0.0011752112,0.00034988616,0.00001866332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013340448,0.00024078824,0.00036644377,0.00068163325,0.00019495552,0.000109902874,0.00009108594,0.00049492484,0.0000028335471],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041761593,0.00019801944,0.88020355,0.0001161627,0.00031179152,0.000012849792,0.034730293,0.00039435277,0.0000017387306,0.07006462,0.007801705,0.005747316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006068515,0.00006025013,0.088340215,0.00031516832,0.00016254318,3.9974535e-10,0.46177498,0.0000015917763,0.0001280728,0.00016893397,0.44822735,0.00021404012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022939589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9914298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9684902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010785586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071396463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513953251","doi":"","title":"The Post-childbirth Employment of Canadian Mothers and the Earnings Trajectories of Their Continuously Employed Counterparts, 1983 to 2004","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Childbirth; Earnings; Demographic economics; Longitudinal data; Fixed effects model; Longitudinal study; Economics; Demography; Labour economics; Psychology; Medicine; Panel data; Pregnancy; Sociology; Econometrics; Accounting","score_opus":0.019432872737149824,"score_gpt":0.2784591058665424,"score_spread":0.25902623312939255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513953251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9689824,0.0005132337,0.000001385558,0.0023127587,0.0003707793,0.0014422861,0.00025420735,0.0000151983195,0.026107745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9554314,0.042177327,0.00005822088,0.00019264342,0.000108044755,0.000108553904,0.000013568793,0.00004248255,0.0018677454],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967861,0.0007644709,0.0006544311,0.000503706,0.0004232302,0.0008680465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701935,0.0012585117,0.00028261697,0.0007150755,0.00040358008,0.00032086956],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038435033,0.00026276545,0.0006006305,0.0004741544,0.00081137597,0.00014866605,0.0010991945,0.0002921372,0.000011087103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083076226,0.00018742774,0.00017066297,0.00031844666,0.0028486298,0.00005695327,0.00032724085,0.0008571932,0.0000011635819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084381376,0.00014521119,0.41644856,0.00012648602,0.0006805676,0.000014353968,0.51641494,0.007724601,0.00005404477,0.014961004,0.0005733099,0.04201309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026067619,0.00046691054,0.4817358,0.00042597676,0.00004433694,0.000008164777,0.2702126,0.0009321123,0.000051014784,0.0031370774,0.23934315,0.0010361171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40665483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7850582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37840337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007051547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030348722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514442006","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.51095","title":"Results of a Survey of Graduate Courses in Applied Welfare Economics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","keywords":"Welfare; Economics","score_opus":0.09538930266594495,"score_gpt":0.291144637914614,"score_spread":0.19575533524866903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514442006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716569,0.000028524793,0.000077866556,0.0007139841,0.0001483373,0.0017318502,0.001402316,0.000014638378,0.024225576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965505,0.001467063,0.0010628607,0.000011591309,0.000021924749,0.0000023655018,0.00021728496,0.000012453913,0.00065395044],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974912,0.0005824349,0.0004746792,0.0005372756,0.00046909731,0.00044530426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776906,0.00033095822,0.00064030447,0.00055849383,0.00054165814,0.0001594982],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003201075,0.00022385592,0.0008081901,0.0005077208,0.00018069119,0.00001791671,0.0011317927,0.00045229646,0.00006797483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013804965,0.00030962532,0.00017548604,0.0004796735,0.00090110855,0.00012264392,0.0004692062,0.0005106514,0.000007697841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0054519093,0.0036509705,0.42950544,0.002928255,0.0011773409,0.00019369644,0.34330878,0.0218599,0.0003636509,0.08980202,0.007819846,0.09393818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016831221,0.00009921932,0.94397384,0.00008770591,0.0000360373,2.4222385e-7,0.050508782,0.0005723857,0.000028018227,0.0011647032,0.0015202794,0.00032565623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1759426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2743574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51446843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020161032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096006016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516117782","doi":"","title":"Marriage matching, risk sharing and spousal labor supplies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Marriage market; Matching (statistics); Bargaining power; Economics; Census; Power (physics); Microeconomics; Labour economics; Econometrics; Sociology; Statistics; Population; Mathematics; Demography","score_opus":0.029269044814231805,"score_gpt":0.32130282339610355,"score_spread":0.29203377858187174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516117782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8791048,0.00030751966,0.000004679105,0.00023507042,0.00061673205,0.0006066335,0.00022210725,0.00007721146,0.11882525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7909174,0.20194475,0.0009677769,0.00007237997,0.0005894633,0.00010113264,0.000054569173,0.00007334378,0.0052791587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962369,0.0004654228,0.0005520152,0.0011385955,0.00044753362,0.0011594889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980031,0.0004981345,0.0002163991,0.00079866627,0.00013401886,0.00034963127],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032364705,0.00033823898,0.00055871607,0.00043729332,0.0009896273,0.0004260766,0.0010510773,0.0006960071,0.00008571676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055295514,0.00039285712,0.00012838695,0.00017303841,0.0010253533,0.00016650735,0.0016685658,0.0022652035,0.00001438447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007558345,0.00014685903,0.8977083,0.00020089438,0.00014815867,0.000116445175,0.04916631,0.0049090334,0.000022353805,0.0107157985,0.00016501025,0.03662526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002204854,0.00016434901,0.63404775,0.00046605675,0.00006120919,0.000023507668,0.12708923,0.014825725,0.000013443469,0.11698346,0.101406835,0.0027135925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006900689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013074775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26366055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086192094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010003608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516135016","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1818700","title":"Bundling of Services and Household Welfare in Developing Countries Using Panel Data: The Case of Peru","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Developing country; Panel data; Business; Economics; Economic growth; Econometrics; Market economy","score_opus":0.0438507272872049,"score_gpt":0.2920553910493763,"score_spread":0.24820466376217137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516135016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99334306,0.004220994,0.0012668257,0.00092128536,0.00009215871,0.000077872006,0.000016495651,0.00000632244,0.00005498126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858925,0.013584829,0.00035900975,0.0000648731,0.00008095182,3.427087e-7,0.0000016131338,0.000008819789,0.0000070765136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851996,0.00009312467,0.0002746089,0.0001299142,0.00019301286,0.0007894084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994808,0.000050323062,0.00019787057,0.0001457135,0.00009301851,0.00003228568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002228938,0.00008486387,0.00015823536,0.000079695266,0.000573745,0.000055653938,0.00034845027,0.00006540785,0.0000010468109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031640855,0.0000664495,0.000023167335,0.00025286828,0.00017880791,0.000323766,0.00007538928,0.00045692155,8.4397875e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003322741,0.000058203244,0.09856206,0.00013159454,0.00013679806,0.000079420286,0.057220068,0.0045789257,0.00016554476,0.83737147,5.0422483e-7,0.0016621659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014030834,0.00010312341,0.018249048,0.00027770194,0.00012003016,0.0017926029,0.87934655,0.0013421082,0.000036082358,0.09596233,0.001008162,0.00035914837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0194726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18051417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8221265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042214675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002556501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9870568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516586681","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2011.01283.x","title":"BONNIEFOX, When Couples become Parents: The Creation of Gender in the Transition to Parenthood. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2010, 334 p., index.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Citation; Sociology; Media studies; Library science; Transition (genetics); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.049982898543453266,"score_gpt":0.2803688166279105,"score_spread":0.23038591808445724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516586681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8290264,0.15758155,0.0001280954,0.0058608614,0.0006235381,0.0013810501,0.00063596555,0.00001730646,0.0047452487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9333985,0.064965546,0.00011206688,0.0012516219,0.00011057657,0.000021670605,0.000082334744,0.000010267727,0.00004740939],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727094,0.0010811677,0.00044256332,0.00022253889,0.0001153416,0.0008674591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982691,0.00038553769,0.00030875215,0.00040578592,0.0002542977,0.00037651902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003313033,0.00017692514,0.0005270048,0.000022038575,0.00030098736,0.00000506316,0.0008314078,0.00034608738,0.00026314074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005220648,0.00014592342,0.00018264892,0.000085052896,0.00097618793,0.00021045562,0.000028551241,0.0002054244,0.0000016008686],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013116489,0.00007148833,0.32178047,0.00096762803,0.00012528333,0.000003954733,0.6286607,0.00004364842,0.000026223266,0.032766387,0.014174979,0.0013661665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018161898,0.000062287676,0.62241036,0.00031585543,0.0001188101,0.0000016154687,0.35367084,0.000024730281,5.4219043e-7,0.0019880298,0.021035874,0.00018943327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77875763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96805435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3006299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022602319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010326687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59505844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517293209","doi":"","title":"The Distribution of Welfare in Uganda","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eastern Africa social science research review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Distribution (mathematics); Inequality; Quarter (Canadian coin); Consumption (sociology); Economics; Survey data collection; Rural area; Social Welfare; Demographic economics; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Development economics; Geography; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10300190518189999,"score_gpt":0.4094122753210235,"score_spread":0.3064103701391235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517293209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22612472,0.07586434,0.000046491816,0.043473203,0.0004802143,0.002594667,0.00007847152,0.00007146221,0.65126646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9315966,0.06621465,0.0000073109427,0.000033123313,0.000103202656,0.00003471154,0.0000026832447,0.0000045474467,0.0020031992],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99529654,0.00097412063,0.00032621846,0.00028242616,0.0021732943,0.00094738335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887264,0.00017417227,0.000068589674,0.00022270669,0.0004926765,0.00016921526],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012881802,0.00008312071,0.000210105,0.00005939876,0.0028709217,0.0001571077,0.0012235073,0.000060042414,0.00018988631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010938846,0.000059545153,0.00008105873,0.004399449,0.0032958395,0.00027394935,0.00010775365,0.0003048023,0.00007685796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017656903,0.00016661253,0.015632045,0.00031675267,0.0000071974987,0.0000064895307,0.024853641,0.000001336043,0.000031309486,0.17806444,0.0021026325,0.7787999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012354227,0.000038426977,0.056155477,0.0003854856,0.000005116539,2.4936696e-7,0.012514023,0.00005616099,0.0000012767898,0.0026023448,0.9279894,0.00012849984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096868654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061275164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92588675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003588306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074157055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518467431","doi":"","title":"Effets incitatifs associes a l'aide sociale: approche de discontinuite de la regression","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02649637240488013,"score_gpt":0.33014696572016927,"score_spread":0.30365059331528915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518467431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7737043,0.0006552921,0.000101166435,0.0011715516,0.0006985537,0.00081594085,0.00015151197,0.00007382391,0.22262788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8789336,0.03268146,0.010749872,0.00025069495,0.0015438424,0.0004649503,0.00017510055,0.00018525957,0.075015225],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.989312,0.0047614686,0.0010929831,0.001403856,0.00082723127,0.0026024827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934927,0.0042320015,0.00057126814,0.000861981,0.0002984908,0.00054353435],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013096809,0.0006747836,0.0010523433,0.00041010004,0.0011770074,0.0006994014,0.0016544724,0.0021655485,0.00006259557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028479495,0.00074012775,0.000513131,0.0005761137,0.003582958,0.00031077428,0.0012457805,0.003773186,0.000026772525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014548421,0.0010857708,0.5759526,0.0006901401,0.00036458555,0.00018193167,0.0932252,0.009627892,0.001062901,0.032300293,0.001936812,0.28342637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024666616,0.00017574932,0.6548956,0.0016461273,0.00011009732,0.00002348454,0.07819266,0.018151969,0.00008561913,0.0934352,0.14865816,0.002158672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006956321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013040979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2812677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077882134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004815694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518544087","doi":"10.7202/010169ar","title":"Environnement familial et bien-être économique des enfants américains","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Poverty; Demography; Inequality; Census; White (mutation); Psychology; Geography; Sociology; Political science; Population","score_opus":0.017398500269045394,"score_gpt":0.25117320271325616,"score_spread":0.23377470244421078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518544087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9510201,0.014927572,0.0043021995,0.0048957127,0.0025854942,0.0006434974,0.00028741336,0.00020358745,0.02113443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92189115,0.06429985,0.004192982,0.0052301656,0.0007157317,0.0000821589,0.000053345568,0.00010069111,0.003433913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99552,0.0006061777,0.00070126134,0.00094821246,0.00042997382,0.0017943842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976771,0.00024725214,0.0002966579,0.0006557829,0.00013909608,0.0009840948],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012258356,0.0006679782,0.0006127915,0.00054755365,0.0014468958,0.00019448221,0.0008628174,0.001022148,0.00012185981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020764854,0.0007694849,0.00065581966,0.0020503015,0.0070432844,0.0005554399,0.00010474301,0.0009330138,0.00014196424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051801868,0.0010575376,0.17604518,0.00016477532,0.00048066062,0.00022524808,0.15059921,0.002371157,0.00035304544,0.6421853,0.0017128573,0.024753254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042373342,0.0008546937,0.32506463,0.0004213848,0.00059206673,0.000055033943,0.15821871,0.00020338644,0.00014109841,0.16935861,0.33817914,0.0026739016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12441119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34244964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47282666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017958784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016672002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519700191","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.16926628.v1","title":"Diversity or Polarisation? The Growth in Work-Rich and Work-Poor Individuals, Families and Communities between 1986 and 1996","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Victoria University","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Paid work; Diversity (politics); Demographic economics; Prime time; Labour economics; Political science; Demography; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Geography; Working hours","score_opus":0.029411574546266517,"score_gpt":0.27127594289624346,"score_spread":0.24186436834997693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519700191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98961616,0.0014614878,0.000003449793,0.00045541237,0.00008991727,0.0003925333,0.00008975626,0.000042947257,0.0078483615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861211,0.009826036,0.00009361132,0.00030848,0.000085760825,0.000008596988,0.00035280094,0.000014452324,0.0031891633],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984799,0.00036377227,0.000241825,0.00023995171,0.0003724429,0.00030209537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896187,0.0006178144,0.000113609385,0.00012240808,0.00007477026,0.000109552464],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006095249,0.00024240343,0.00033283266,0.00017134186,0.002399705,0.00024301538,0.0003343235,0.0004059999,0.00004812712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061126455,0.00018107751,0.000026090862,0.00055844185,0.00045713843,0.00024110785,0.00023357046,0.0004571169,0.0000014351955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027823886,0.000010775961,0.73239315,0.000026648882,0.00003286333,4.7747784e-7,0.26503506,4.1761825e-7,4.3400032e-8,0.0004892421,0.00011700307,0.0018665128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019459226,0.000017088016,0.6917448,0.000039228536,0.00006441941,7.5045435e-8,0.30682802,0.0000013830296,2.0574433e-7,0.0006256625,0.00031123956,0.00017329109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041967638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09773623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05576859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041161104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013452437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99889904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520255224","doi":"","title":"Taxing Care : enhancing the childcare time in the dual earner era","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Poverty; Incentive; Labour economics; Dual (grammatical number); Economics; Child care; Work (physics); Paid work; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Working hours; Market economy; Medicine","score_opus":0.021914024535518457,"score_gpt":0.31508101864691795,"score_spread":0.2931669941113995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1520255224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7892652,0.0002858882,0.0000014958746,0.0013702615,0.00061602093,0.001043235,0.000051112118,0.000031569754,0.20733522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991937,0.004489284,0.00020517585,0.00028062644,0.0009766556,0.00020072951,0.000060954182,0.000050354723,0.0017992442],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546915,0.0013751973,0.0005613864,0.0008042342,0.0006339914,0.0011560668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709916,0.0012355174,0.00017125701,0.0011594169,0.00019837021,0.00013625834],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006393757,0.0002960525,0.00040415756,0.00028695542,0.0010765381,0.0005482924,0.001890272,0.00077024946,0.00010164173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001070081,0.0002233243,0.00019514338,0.0003064457,0.0008290568,0.00011584079,0.00096477655,0.0052851713,0.00003191335],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006235998,0.00021218925,0.06869464,0.00023161308,0.00013610341,0.00011837127,0.7166442,0.012820089,0.00033839207,0.008448116,0.00023386611,0.19206005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000835892,0.00008273028,0.16256005,0.0003997359,0.00002844308,0.000009585675,0.7258679,0.0035348523,0.000032607688,0.0062868986,0.09911389,0.0012474117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003313871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07212072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20553598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000911034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019177926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520471341","doi":"10.17848/9780880995511.ch1","title":"Child Care and the Supply of Labor in Canada and the United State","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Business; Labour economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.006691475386035594,"score_gpt":0.20266856193980598,"score_spread":0.19597708655377039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1520471341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098411284,0.0030916538,7.755631e-7,0.0014610217,0.00010910074,0.0005098967,0.00038344896,0.000008180673,0.89602464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8430936,0.03587307,0.000017109809,0.0019148912,0.000061299645,0.0000068504423,0.000050214538,0.000022638786,0.118960336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991136,0.00009606384,0.00019535846,0.00015118952,0.00027317245,0.00017061387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993853,0.00023997512,0.00007859817,0.00015758115,0.00008678337,0.00005178659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025808866,0.00013775393,0.00026066002,0.00005502609,0.00021293611,0.00003221055,0.00019228044,0.000088820765,0.00011621492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016542583,0.00007428447,0.00002736595,0.000080745915,0.00087912567,0.0000231475,0.00003761441,0.00022386371,4.580155e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009682761,0.0000022013244,0.009507446,0.000025912746,0.000051325496,0.000005799808,0.06264595,0.000034256995,3.0869657e-8,0.9243173,0.00036059582,0.0029523442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0077222297,0.00004680778,0.063686304,0.00023513952,0.00019377876,0.000003867306,0.1791885,0.0002740652,6.17058e-7,0.09703531,0.6507843,0.0008290951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9907094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.827282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008987712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082910963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3239175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521720362","doi":"10.7202/602027ar","title":"Les familles sans enfant ou avec enfants : aisance ou pauvreté? Les faits au Canada et au Québec de 1971 à 1987","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043477003713188384,"score_gpt":0.2918478092431704,"score_spread":0.248370805529982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521720362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9162689,0.0021532048,0.00083049294,0.020414267,0.00201751,0.0005014987,0.0005224244,0.00013223583,0.057159506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97594,0.0023135655,0.000694425,0.007412131,0.0013276399,0.000039937386,0.000057670306,0.000070849776,0.012143792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947398,0.00095976674,0.0009984003,0.0010066157,0.00034951317,0.0019459525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678564,0.001055308,0.0004885071,0.0006853186,0.00018136947,0.00080384704],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011883872,0.00080449326,0.0009028245,0.00012047774,0.0012893238,0.0002057469,0.0010917094,0.0007844073,0.00021758088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050290773,0.00086321676,0.0003094597,0.00040065977,0.000705399,0.0005076687,0.00011692606,0.00079071394,0.00003642852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058881582,0.00029744607,0.25779188,0.00013101436,0.00021672553,0.00009081407,0.19659863,0.0010471757,0.00021681626,0.4368029,0.0021423977,0.104605325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006632154,0.00018363225,0.6502957,0.00022509237,0.0001044859,0.000020843128,0.040898807,0.0008677555,0.0001521382,0.004782467,0.3004867,0.0013191731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99786305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99962795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43202043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057914266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019915285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521813107","doi":"","title":"KINSHIP CARE POLICY: EXACERBATING WOMEN'S OPPRESSION THROUGH NEOLIBERAL FAMILIALIZATION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"MacSphere (McMaster University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Kinship; Kinship care; Gender studies; Political science; Sociology; Anthropology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.023592977790996398,"score_gpt":0.2550628664299836,"score_spread":0.2314698886389872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521813107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13002227,0.00015572816,0.00039806834,0.000023492292,0.0012917806,0.00043239832,0.0000474098,0.00021920787,0.86740965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12513803,0.00053802965,0.000614708,0.00020995771,0.00064114947,0.0000050210247,0.0006505792,0.00008553141,0.872117],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973007,0.0004037397,0.00027883975,0.0006551673,0.0005653725,0.0007961699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986437,0.00004947152,0.00037696725,0.00032232446,0.00036042585,0.00024714385],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012752498,0.00043641948,0.00041455418,0.0002581727,0.0010256387,0.00015699994,0.000759784,0.0008315577,0.013385915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059778624,0.00052047626,0.00017169694,0.0011093067,0.00014549344,0.00066198374,0.000109186854,0.00042919585,0.000056263347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022670074,0.00008437778,0.008932592,0.00041587587,0.00011397063,0.000054301203,0.8039923,0.000104808605,0.0000873251,0.055656135,0.0005081343,0.1298235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071557926,0.00007133749,0.0057768254,0.00023076434,0.00009750564,3.6779858e-7,0.6381079,0.000029383911,0.000036059933,0.0028223435,0.35139486,0.00071707973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015800847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017727992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35088673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011800159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010250466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522337257","doi":"","title":"Our Grandmothers, Ourselves: Reflections of Canadian Women","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.03691917296317944,"score_gpt":0.30073659229808913,"score_spread":0.2638174193349097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522337257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8456685,0.00031861715,6.771341e-7,0.0018773107,0.00053832907,0.0002138362,0.00017463883,0.000039787872,0.1511683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679836,0.0015286757,0.00007224652,0.0016087685,0.00023123386,0.00008481568,0.0000045140355,0.00002307915,0.028463034],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784255,0.000115466326,0.00022693614,0.00026883616,0.00022951688,0.0013167168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816453,0.000036764122,0.000051306448,0.0002344886,0.00019619733,0.0013167209],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048014612,0.00017934346,0.00032752444,0.00075995346,0.001407026,0.000047000474,0.0002937452,0.00012372386,0.0005153479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012128715,0.00019076683,0.00006100287,0.0014131354,0.0002918813,0.00011810521,0.000008594122,0.0001426702,0.00008260395],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011785622,0.00003604934,0.01832469,0.000037263693,0.0005370393,0.000040801304,0.94433296,0.00009365671,0.0000146707425,0.021569453,0.012727318,0.0022743084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001843603,0.000050006813,0.0032014663,0.000012382286,0.00001257509,7.351215e-7,0.7497964,0.0000016829975,6.6955624e-7,0.005213401,0.24132434,0.00020196776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6907617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99430346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3035418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029278612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028001145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522508722","doi":"","title":"Household Labour Supply and Welfare Participation in Sweden","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Labour supply; Earnings; Incentive; Economics; Labour economics; Work (physics); Quality (philosophy); Schedule; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.017798691644048487,"score_gpt":0.2831244129967102,"score_spread":0.26532572135266175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522508722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928541,0.0014696133,0.00045671503,0.0012951936,0.0001810091,0.00009683715,0.0000027895455,0.000021536884,0.003622163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99203837,0.00645014,0.00006800047,0.00010663535,0.000102658916,0.0000044933918,0.0000011447707,0.000012139451,0.0012164013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757546,0.00026804605,0.00019134089,0.0001411851,0.0002493499,0.0015746267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996641,0.000028772387,0.00007372152,0.00007386094,0.000051055173,0.00010848347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002090732,0.00009138537,0.00011775923,0.00009310714,0.0004592784,0.00009239707,0.00012361059,0.00009479688,0.000034400848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001446613,0.000088978006,0.000032942746,0.00027999497,0.000066700144,0.00021854568,0.000009285089,0.00073646323,0.0000041916087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049290097,0.0000358203,0.31235304,0.0000017360254,0.000011816545,0.0000025886798,0.0030197324,0.00004615764,0.000025276084,0.68294036,0.00001248072,0.0015460742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011949606,0.00016457119,0.50294936,0.000014845247,0.000027629581,0.000046140834,0.09580333,0.000035197758,0.000010737454,0.37587634,0.023559706,0.00031719936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010368235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03659239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30706403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005562114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011710839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9809873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523501416","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.546144","title":"On Representative Social Capital","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012684795782990052,"score_gpt":0.2968467931060323,"score_spread":0.28416199732304226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523501416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.970753,0.0002963129,0.0034329954,0.0027581416,0.0004776497,0.00010601608,0.0000034377172,0.00004451701,0.022127923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99492836,0.0013443918,0.00005000362,0.0002538287,0.0008777876,0.0000027309068,0.0000023294824,0.0000150514825,0.0025255375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970204,0.000154321,0.00017173075,0.00018163456,0.00049887685,0.0019730055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955696,0.000044610686,0.00011010793,0.00007767807,0.00010676553,0.00010387118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012382751,0.00011496734,0.00013060882,0.00007921826,0.001220637,0.0000887174,0.00028538782,0.000106694766,0.0000363959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011469195,0.00010917353,0.00012675441,0.00023514993,0.00018855653,0.0001872519,0.000018230652,0.0013243301,0.00008185341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020595928,0.00006774808,0.0008958765,5.420186e-7,0.000056728208,0.000006686673,0.0377016,0.00008595265,0.000031902116,0.9600876,0.0001386876,0.00090605766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064989465,0.00017032483,0.0036804988,0.000003806112,0.000014075916,0.00001850512,0.15535201,0.0000017969043,0.000006819015,0.839567,0.00040376533,0.00013149933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013449021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010906577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12052063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002049674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004073357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93882763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526196312","doi":"","title":"Sommaire de : L'instabilite des gains familiaux et du revenu familial au Canada, 1986 a 1991 et 1996 a 2001","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04211805407442039,"score_gpt":0.3295141840995226,"score_spread":0.2873961300251022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526196312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84036744,0.0005823215,0.00001697947,0.005002998,0.0015271943,0.0013340709,0.0010512518,0.00006368012,0.15005405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89141685,0.08942379,0.0023825935,0.0016828638,0.0015214345,0.00031960825,0.00028935948,0.00016211421,0.01280138],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878383,0.0035629212,0.0015446517,0.00203522,0.0010990861,0.0039197938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942179,0.0019787622,0.00043360103,0.0015990515,0.0004393968,0.0013313034],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010496072,0.0009311002,0.0012709122,0.0004627053,0.001433725,0.00021954355,0.0022014682,0.0013000615,0.00014577266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023179033,0.0011280556,0.0005056989,0.0007362211,0.0030939993,0.0004493464,0.0014493868,0.0038710248,0.00003223662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001660883,0.000753666,0.78725636,0.00041392312,0.0002647287,0.00021875832,0.051444955,0.041619565,0.00009279271,0.0262887,0.0011731741,0.0903073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001251366,0.00016319005,0.74960834,0.0005706417,0.000046143374,0.000026815382,0.053713165,0.016221901,0.0000039954493,0.005396109,0.17158441,0.0014139309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93200636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17041123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024066016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03719776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526387647","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01673.x","title":"Domestic violence and women's autonomy in developing countries: theory and evidence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":271,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Jealousy; Endogeneity; Autonomy; Bargaining power; Economics; Poison control; Demographic economics; Human factors and ergonomics; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Medicine; Environmental health; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.1013641400484464,"score_gpt":0.21820672584728826,"score_spread":0.11684258579884185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526387647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99605376,0.0016884254,0.00013828547,0.0006632229,0.00059097627,0.00018236246,0.000017010449,0.0000046635364,0.0006613223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907207,0.0072098966,0.0007324367,0.0010655489,0.00014055871,0.0000121961175,4.5377763e-7,0.000018950324,0.00009927015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982338,0.00017840676,0.0005425482,0.00028013255,0.000003908739,0.0007612008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975077,0.00045278887,0.00031928153,0.00015951764,0.00013423561,0.0014265125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026636312,0.00018417394,0.00039821904,0.0004997409,0.00027971523,0.00012846757,0.00037418294,0.00015919172,0.00008518823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056432793,0.00022485452,0.00003803707,0.00012799376,0.00059968495,0.0006751257,0.000022160253,0.00023160844,0.0000033111812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003277001,0.0000025520926,0.13438626,0.00003558273,0.00002720679,0.00010374086,0.07080589,0.00004645834,4.886118e-7,0.79252666,0.0000044260696,0.0020279908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063210964,0.0002231118,0.11391781,0.0011435484,0.00003017779,0.00023340707,0.0441566,0.00021504497,0.00000397482,0.8294594,0.009317134,0.0006676621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.183183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9729658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78978276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033677889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008629143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99699104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526738299","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.345460","title":"Bayesian Analysis of An Econometric Model of Birth Inputs and Outputs","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"National Longitudinal Surveys; Birth weight; Generalized estimating equation; Gestational age; Econometrics; Statistics; Obstetrics; Mathematics; Medicine; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.018003099180288976,"score_gpt":0.2534899412608848,"score_spread":0.23548684208059584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526738299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705613,0.0018946544,0.024357231,0.00015435535,0.00004574891,0.000054285505,0.000014094144,0.000009478723,0.0029088305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98807037,0.0107009085,0.00030339306,0.000037981474,0.0000498587,6.2045916e-7,0.0000017757175,0.00000865209,0.0008264298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981497,0.00011375826,0.00033140884,0.00015973917,0.00027852054,0.0009668779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930024,0.000038651455,0.0002590566,0.00013938587,0.0001225857,0.00014005124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001402796,0.000097298805,0.00030840538,0.00088245224,0.0001966968,0.000031178643,0.00025645638,0.00009027998,0.000041686326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057451918,0.0000938871,0.00013201556,0.0016073544,0.00013624884,0.0002459955,0.000018387469,0.00040685802,8.4068756e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034826615,0.0006068216,0.36798644,0.00002547137,0.002812296,0.000002276109,0.035628833,0.034669444,0.00029863455,0.50950253,0.000019857905,0.048412543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010541453,0.00062652293,0.036307517,0.000009960078,0.0010700194,0.000012046733,0.027819052,0.75834984,0.000023716892,0.17409562,0.0001702562,0.0004612963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040498242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010327569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72368044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026517347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057839724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57630265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528283841","doi":"","title":"Fiscalité, effets de voisinage et offre de travail au noir","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Economics; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037360448645718185,"score_gpt":0.3264545261281376,"score_spread":0.2890940774824194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528283841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6876017,0.0004796843,0.000040975938,0.0032747898,0.0009288177,0.000792242,0.00020882521,0.000059419708,0.30661356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87598354,0.05618129,0.0015643857,0.000641836,0.0009245586,0.00019422531,0.000071899885,0.00013786428,0.06430039],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.990134,0.0032836127,0.0010742794,0.0015937587,0.00072067324,0.0031936634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953986,0.0017241762,0.0003181531,0.0013676117,0.0002020148,0.0009894813],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009924173,0.0006730606,0.000982237,0.00044983215,0.0008525919,0.0004091512,0.0020456444,0.0017114332,0.0005185117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011188822,0.0008188085,0.00049442897,0.0005040795,0.0022015201,0.00026425297,0.0009826522,0.0036597895,0.00016895348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015988425,0.0016921769,0.4540005,0.0010019899,0.0004408279,0.00039832253,0.1052501,0.03671451,0.0002503312,0.04819144,0.0011430373,0.35075688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019582051,0.00028129577,0.6986465,0.0006132291,0.0000614921,0.000039829953,0.037384827,0.058141846,0.000030911968,0.022717884,0.17834336,0.0017806331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0109613985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03689343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34897625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00804791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003586823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530868015","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1545711","title":"Gender and Racial Biases: Evidence from Child Adoption","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"African american; Girl; Race (biology); Psychology; Foreign born; Set (abstract data type); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Demography; Gender studies; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.02303823057089708,"score_gpt":0.28920589483003756,"score_spread":0.26616766425914046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530868015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882159,0.0038616178,0.0033308663,0.00060854084,0.0009357831,0.000104394276,0.0000048145357,0.00003825848,0.0028997874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783183,0.019237593,0.0002785703,0.0001539292,0.0017284389,0.0000022368695,0.0000033187546,0.000013057456,0.0002646003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976614,0.00014810714,0.00019260048,0.00021629201,0.00039328865,0.0013882975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993445,0.00013513865,0.00012121225,0.00012618543,0.00010898749,0.00016393338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018875292,0.000121612924,0.00012957018,0.00007366973,0.000980203,0.0001741784,0.0002725715,0.00016613152,0.000085192136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004422185,0.00011368408,0.000068476045,0.00017456028,0.0001782121,0.00046785772,0.000030604588,0.0019547758,0.00002181967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012319157,0.00017850072,0.29024488,0.000007752726,0.00025794486,0.000013398103,0.05472629,0.000048064547,0.0043657054,0.59331757,0.00022695713,0.05648976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012887256,0.00026195735,0.3724086,0.00009129109,0.00018524802,0.00017087198,0.103789814,0.00052026927,0.00003142444,0.5096154,0.010858573,0.0007777958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016181929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036626868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083702125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024821883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019912352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9809522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531545156","doi":"10.4000/interventionseconomiques.725","title":"L’impact de la politique conservatrice de réforme du financement des services de garde sur la pauvreté et l’inégalité au Québec","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Interventions économiques","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Poverty; Welfare economics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025562268451289602,"score_gpt":0.3171171183422653,"score_spread":0.2915548498909757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531545156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9444881,0.0049661305,0.0067174267,0.005392686,0.00028516894,0.00026849753,0.0003603407,0.00015032325,0.037371326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98118025,0.0055507505,0.0026416194,0.00081807974,0.00045929986,0.00009711784,0.000048158898,0.00004721525,0.009157537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578387,0.0019060635,0.00074139226,0.0003876112,0.000115818555,0.0010652316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979346,0.00088233885,0.0003583757,0.00029850737,0.00024081978,0.000285356],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028628693,0.00037529587,0.00040706404,0.0001576631,0.0006058397,0.00044786028,0.00053781323,0.00044377003,0.0003420014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017145988,0.0004172106,0.0007734934,0.00022688416,0.001029489,0.00069634273,0.00012122914,0.00036287672,0.00003814969],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002407969,0.0008304727,0.8063553,0.0004752577,0.00017442908,0.000032749693,0.021524359,0.00081101933,0.000031097905,0.16525762,0.0026745813,0.0018090211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051327475,0.00019921764,0.869916,0.00074339716,0.0001571507,0.00006279976,0.0054159337,0.0014376185,0.00004226098,0.056086786,0.065007396,0.00041816517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9207149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8328369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10917083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004263372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004337016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531600104","doi":"10.7202/039577ar","title":"Ellen Bayuk Rosenman, and Claudia C. Klaver, eds. Other Mothers: Beyond the Maternal Ideal. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2008. ISBN: 978-0814202869. US$55.95","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); State (computer science); Sociology; Media studies; History; Humanities; Political science; Art; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009556658823160492,"score_gpt":0.2210593026056636,"score_spread":0.2115026437825031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531600104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9362628,0.0026115905,0.00019794835,0.0041196495,0.0016932872,0.0009268285,0.000257619,0.00015053293,0.05377974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610133,0.017860178,0.00014254899,0.0031819844,0.0008732397,0.0000034349384,0.000008096356,0.000042003827,0.016875206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788076,0.000365157,0.00023348098,0.0004274587,0.00049538567,0.00059776206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895364,0.00020937528,0.00017186145,0.0003956123,0.00007417389,0.00019534014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006805325,0.00028411337,0.00028686353,0.00004116664,0.0012266034,0.00034163645,0.00055396796,0.00019612262,0.00011319209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002605972,0.0002050239,0.000074247444,0.00020521024,0.00044532833,0.00023289287,0.00009203985,0.0003079187,0.000032777105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005058024,0.00045882814,0.030087173,0.00007022154,0.0004715246,0.00014179703,0.06826022,0.00014573941,0.00144593,0.6205484,0.27249172,0.0053726165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012787428,0.00021514071,0.11899098,0.000050674767,0.00012606813,0.0000062309805,0.0050697895,0.0010292577,0.000055319273,0.016968442,0.8556956,0.000513748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003913968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014641293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057220477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010101025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9434166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535147298","doi":"10.3386/w20201","title":"Women's Income and Marriage Markets in the United States: Evidence from the Civil War Pension","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Economic History Association; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Pension; Spanish Civil War; Pension system; Economics; Political science; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.24887217729364963,"score_gpt":0.46494763276169315,"score_spread":0.21607545546804352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535147298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90464115,0.001364833,0.0000046648006,0.0036971897,0.00048115963,0.0008307979,0.00016752981,0.000011220071,0.08880143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656187,0.031726696,0.000024153418,0.00015535824,0.00063689885,0.00008629086,0.0003140267,0.000019069705,0.0014187795],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941211,0.0022118695,0.0005350798,0.0004499172,0.0021901503,0.000491902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853121,0.012805304,0.00026009177,0.00038288016,0.0011390409,0.00010059341],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030088998,0.00017052992,0.00033623463,0.0004519852,0.0005032273,0.00015532326,0.0011264366,0.00033391648,0.00030805136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005813479,0.00011695118,0.00006542275,0.00046220687,0.0008387463,0.00017239823,0.00024682895,0.0008751907,0.000028727241],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004876721,0.00028130686,0.52466017,0.0005184622,0.00049474195,0.000041568048,0.14921568,0.0015873114,0.00003698885,0.14251508,0.17665952,0.0035015184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050893147,0.000091950315,0.45679602,0.0005142788,0.000016559461,0.0000034870905,0.03613407,0.0027526172,5.8717654e-7,0.41344914,0.08939529,0.00033705466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0695603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031827547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27093408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017107262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033501727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538659675","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Income Splitting on Intrafamily Distribution in a Dynamic Family Bargaining Model","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Spouse; Economics; Taxable income; Bargaining power; Labour economics; Labour supply; Welfare; Income tax; Distribution (mathematics); Demographic economics; Public economics; Microeconomics; Law; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.03979369560422289,"score_gpt":0.37399426497408794,"score_spread":0.33420056936986503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538659675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9202153,0.00017538713,0.00010823151,0.00006216518,0.00022402778,0.00082198833,0.00020194134,0.00003295998,0.078158006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832283,0.015949262,0.0002236292,0.000023385892,0.000106920095,0.00007048542,0.000108718916,0.000048783106,0.00024047458],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519175,0.00074303115,0.0011136063,0.00081965985,0.000625575,0.0015063945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964581,0.0017895226,0.00038613085,0.000875655,0.00025477482,0.00023577696],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010872681,0.00036275337,0.0006192311,0.0005461542,0.0005763567,0.00021589655,0.0012700672,0.00075968495,0.0000036002605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016307713,0.00033056684,0.00031111104,0.0005213799,0.00091419555,0.00012700088,0.00072477496,0.0026602596,0.0000030848162],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028840348,0.00025919976,0.11013436,0.00007536832,0.00011509233,0.000022889055,0.010368905,0.7542203,0.00012115944,0.01545073,0.00001140146,0.10893215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005448958,0.000121137404,0.30990994,0.00034993936,0.0000057978027,5.8129586e-7,0.019665798,0.6481846,0.0000022397371,0.020697135,0.000090849426,0.00042708745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044637793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006267223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19977558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006130449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028908711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538849650","doi":"10.7202/601212ar","title":"L’aide sociale et le supplément au revenu de travail : une simulation économique des revenus (salaires) de réserve","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05937351845191609,"score_gpt":0.2981005998967756,"score_spread":0.23872708144485955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538849650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9488329,0.0012916087,0.0111294,0.02936947,0.0006919153,0.000702967,0.00019339503,0.00014283409,0.0076454952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973091,0.002166829,0.0039550764,0.006006928,0.0012022028,0.000047295885,0.0000730449,0.00006972065,0.013387912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99534404,0.0015269283,0.00087982975,0.00070914585,0.000118085605,0.0014219709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976218,0.0007410697,0.00044345905,0.00048660082,0.00015246171,0.00055463077],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002850918,0.0005180195,0.0006761521,0.000119587676,0.00083727,0.00025465814,0.0005814941,0.00085633545,0.00011827094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037802846,0.0006610474,0.00039015186,0.0003967106,0.00077849487,0.0008739089,0.00006973467,0.00055174535,0.00009252633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013469368,0.0009997999,0.034562442,0.00021717083,0.00021381475,0.00004473209,0.14868662,0.059341427,0.00073499995,0.6519079,0.0017277437,0.10142867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017351286,0.00043663487,0.28060532,0.00030656997,0.00017206547,0.000017154543,0.015437697,0.013866872,0.00041878133,0.6000927,0.08563362,0.0012774591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.093085974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.099724956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24604288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036648375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004311952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539911811","doi":"","title":"Efficiency and the Division of Marital Assets","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Asset (computer security); Division (mathematics); Economics; Consumption (sociology); Work (physics); Division of labour; Investment (military); Incentive; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Law; Market economy; Sociology; Engineering; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.030592828732101913,"score_gpt":0.3283414944450407,"score_spread":0.2977486657129388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539911811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8133256,0.00037666733,0.000011176242,0.0003961202,0.00039608634,0.0006442482,0.000036626006,0.000016077833,0.1847974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92985266,0.06870934,0.00017208219,0.000026639498,0.00011067518,0.00003903495,0.000012718297,0.000019473366,0.0010573819],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716103,0.00074690254,0.00047394237,0.0005434831,0.00047310357,0.0006015113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773264,0.0012099842,0.00017669132,0.00058490096,0.00015763684,0.00013816355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043374277,0.00017834603,0.00043659846,0.00023798262,0.0005105609,0.000113771355,0.00082557456,0.0004071008,0.000016525757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010429552,0.00014912948,0.00013817164,0.0001694552,0.002624339,0.00007124227,0.0010951944,0.0010982882,0.0000022919166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003411027,0.00076718477,0.5146419,0.00047119605,0.0002405237,0.00006224935,0.092463136,0.013925831,0.000047381047,0.066763006,0.00024652464,0.31003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058847694,0.00030739413,0.77173406,0.00064019876,0.000047395308,0.000013480196,0.074059784,0.06507444,0.000018033365,0.051177364,0.029345935,0.0016971389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017358233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018449841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3083329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033214575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009264879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9669486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541277990","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.34.3.321","title":"Child Poverty and Family Structure in Canada, 1981-1997","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Child poverty; Incidence (geometry); Demographic economics; Economics; Geography; Demography; Economic growth; Sociology","score_opus":0.04231298995691719,"score_gpt":0.3122307364317755,"score_spread":0.26991774647485833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541277990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9594029,0.024289135,0.000037383244,0.0005088573,0.0010131606,0.00013819456,0.0000385175,0.000004764454,0.014567049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928915,0.0049003367,0.00037101703,0.0015666848,0.00012539685,0.0000013423792,7.4454675e-7,0.0000071867435,0.0001358214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979589,0.00039600642,0.00051573914,0.00017155138,0.00059409306,0.00036370786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986941,0.00027322464,0.00033527127,0.00009429966,0.00045557172,0.00014750591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048548816,0.00020702889,0.00066551915,0.00012693164,0.00042757814,0.000041273066,0.00019901774,0.000060261023,0.000005313908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016306459,0.0001620321,0.00006157318,0.00039219682,0.00025444315,0.00022878249,0.00003436701,0.00040085972,7.049469e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098995064,0.00012162429,0.76609415,0.000039986557,0.0007597038,0.00013078413,0.11943981,0.0010874022,0.00034131113,0.03399515,0.07748484,0.000406228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006747728,0.00007553306,0.65571,0.00006413499,0.000032612323,0.000008449037,0.29532862,0.000020083671,0.00001297384,0.0032286684,0.044645905,0.00019826952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.098007664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8338933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7358856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058510015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013668046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9079988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542889439","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.588346","title":"A Collective Retirement Model: Identification and Estimation in the Presence of Externalities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Identification (biology); Estimation; Economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01921017063640879,"score_gpt":0.2936529641318108,"score_spread":0.274442793495402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542889439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9061829,0.00066493417,0.09114574,0.0009285854,0.00004865027,0.00016913617,0.000001383208,0.000005114108,0.0008535977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967671,0.002370115,0.00026562784,0.000026455697,0.000025491187,0.000007350246,6.254357e-7,0.0000032370244,0.0005339802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987795,0.00014233284,0.00018670957,0.00008394811,0.00032408242,0.00048347365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996594,0.00004387276,0.00012447256,0.000066098066,0.000086452186,0.000019670488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002415066,0.000049144113,0.00006687201,0.00006151319,0.00026884433,0.00005871778,0.00017282365,0.000034857614,9.120325e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011888218,0.00003928765,0.00002241446,0.00020240831,0.000118624484,0.0001966328,0.000009090114,0.0003208938,3.8399202e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001734012,0.00005476462,0.004851544,0.000005417925,0.00001673015,4.6618868e-7,0.12003021,0.016183631,0.00020663599,0.85741174,0.0000036806553,0.0012178087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025882752,0.000054626365,0.011704587,0.00001798045,0.000010718723,0.000006970569,0.07491606,0.007501524,0.00001914169,0.90545857,0.0000043359682,0.000046644156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011782567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01015544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09088011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009522988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028071231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5666974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544895496","doi":"10.3386/w19544","title":"A Comparison of Micro and Macro Expenditure Measures Across Countries Using Differing Survey Methods","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Macro; Econometrics; Statistics; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5098818008180629,"score_gpt":0.6033778172380398,"score_spread":0.09349601641997696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544895496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99074954,0.0021824418,0.00053661806,0.00013379162,0.00055784825,0.0005810959,0.00043980533,0.0000128257625,0.004806052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99157006,0.00085897953,0.006883358,0.000009741551,0.00024298787,0.000029422883,0.00011507982,0.000023804996,0.00026659702],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956942,0.0016175715,0.00070794113,0.0005075937,0.00095109135,0.0005215705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951116,0.002452437,0.00042130644,0.0002644399,0.0016130714,0.0001371313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011792167,0.00020829675,0.00070827623,0.00030553454,0.00049518736,0.00025572866,0.0007008909,0.0005596837,0.00008712114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011639653,0.00022142153,0.000108009015,0.00012843467,0.0013257944,0.00016098446,0.00070507237,0.00075341994,0.000004784471],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012271915,0.00016348375,0.837975,0.0005344012,0.00042979274,7.3744627e-7,0.046291683,0.0073085106,0.0039097876,0.1003842,0.0015694328,0.0013102057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010738535,0.00009087491,0.5968452,0.00035549552,0.000042257027,0.0000025631593,0.034565456,0.028552795,0.002642115,0.33284613,0.002018584,0.0009646753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0446803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008699918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24112985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072032673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016385706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96168125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545905191","doi":"10.1016/j.red.2014.11.004","title":"Women's emancipation through education: A macroeconomic analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Dynamics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Research Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Marriage market; Economics; Counterfactual thinking; Educational attainment; Human capital; Labour economics; Remarriage; Demographic economics; Higher education; Quarter (Canadian coin); Value (mathematics); Economic growth; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.015124035208795562,"score_gpt":0.30972550213696637,"score_spread":0.2946014669281708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545905191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7914039,0.009542447,0.008664306,0.0018458067,0.0016928074,0.00079536997,0.00009419575,0.000084238935,0.18587697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8917585,0.10059587,0.0023972406,0.002351335,0.00035974203,0.00010701598,0.00021686759,0.000026326887,0.0021871137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843353,0.00018707252,0.0006535054,0.00031598643,0.000098227036,0.00031169417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987027,0.000104416504,0.0005128318,0.00046751622,0.00010106148,0.00011148768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012928749,0.00015311524,0.00061478943,0.000121510944,0.00016276735,0.00003877492,0.00037971506,0.000091608,0.00049828284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011335741,0.0001713153,0.00026378295,0.00033661583,0.00015189349,0.00028248702,0.00003880499,0.00008055223,0.00013205557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047937765,0.00013226154,0.060520537,0.0019086313,0.00046758962,1.247801e-7,0.0050470056,0.001277288,8.0696924e-7,0.89083564,0.0010098071,0.038795505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010389198,0.00022650155,0.087343,0.0023707945,0.0026899655,0.0000038598587,0.024724271,0.114093535,0.0000019269523,0.13422252,0.63111806,0.0021666335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007554537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032880649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75661314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011251951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006422861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6986035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546429295","doi":"10.7202/000427ar","title":"Famille nucléaire et accueil de parents dans les ménages urbains au Gabon","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Physics; Art","score_opus":0.02244812367829299,"score_gpt":0.25588327939590483,"score_spread":0.23343515571761184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546429295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8828658,0.03258928,0.0014430408,0.0036117234,0.0023434595,0.0004266871,0.00028236792,0.00030304922,0.076134585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92621547,0.0505838,0.00084745215,0.0027439569,0.00065721525,0.000056823803,0.00004322242,0.00012014756,0.018731896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99449736,0.0010579041,0.000633031,0.00088890863,0.00077720144,0.0021456121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997404,0.00034469148,0.00031683603,0.0007312348,0.00019051773,0.0010127649],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010168006,0.00069455896,0.00061281974,0.0004949116,0.0019092889,0.00023311585,0.0011250617,0.0012428161,0.00020778406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003197401,0.0007929558,0.0006880987,0.0026797918,0.0040223137,0.0004856867,0.00010475568,0.0011222739,0.000110941495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014192771,0.0005584388,0.58329195,0.00012986167,0.00028368144,0.00014608295,0.31822014,0.00024761065,0.00019840668,0.06470897,0.019249076,0.012951592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011051688,0.0002311302,0.4018581,0.00022827438,0.0004089121,0.00003125377,0.34007484,0.0019851497,0.000030363888,0.004167706,0.24848768,0.0013914349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104775764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24886516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22923861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014534998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076137896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546649291","doi":"","title":"MODÈLE DYNAMIQUE EN PRÉSENCE DE BIAIS DE SÉLECTION ET D’HÉTÉROGÉNÉITÉ INOBSERVÉE: APPLICATION À LA PARTICIPATION DES FEMMES SUR LE MARCHÉ DU TRAVAIL AU CANADA","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de recherche","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.19682097114229682,"score_gpt":0.3432596986355815,"score_spread":0.14643872749328465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546649291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8449361,0.0008777045,0.1410016,0.0043836115,0.00038200713,0.00036471733,0.00003155273,0.000087512104,0.007935225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97143877,0.008621537,0.01124164,0.0007777747,0.00028122138,0.0001792618,0.00003822612,0.000046992827,0.007374593],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920694,0.0058441455,0.0003486007,0.00043098445,0.00033974918,0.00096708763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713767,0.0017414101,0.00016926079,0.00027132186,0.00025208967,0.00042823842],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005664082,0.000266533,0.0002612383,0.00007577121,0.00082274654,0.000064345695,0.00036809372,0.0013053964,0.000009409519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021970633,0.0003018316,0.00010147631,0.0010462673,0.0010540144,0.00035591255,0.00003176038,0.0012413474,0.0000071684995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007765698,0.00055475096,0.6174972,0.00040987984,0.00015885354,0.000064574364,0.22692761,0.030834856,0.009244066,0.047796838,0.005033731,0.06139998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005862001,0.00009148571,0.83363354,0.00008746541,0.000121508,0.000088503184,0.02101314,0.109136716,0.001816309,0.016284106,0.016495494,0.0006455565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85645515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9074713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2161363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012699867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014167368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W154729589","doi":"10.1037/h0087168","title":"Les qualités psychométriques du PSA-A.","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.19780826393587572,"score_gpt":0.3093492179410287,"score_spread":0.11154095400515299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W154729589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9492551,0.0088002775,0.00022399506,0.013646248,0.011992914,0.00039369313,0.000121903046,0.000023314504,0.015542518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990513,0.0014730167,0.0025050794,0.0005986479,0.00110463,0.000007909505,0.0000035184091,0.000031477146,0.0037627076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923409,0.0004885702,0.0017629123,0.000932604,0.0011698314,0.0033051465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901241,0.00014749309,0.0012591471,0.00047570188,0.001912697,0.0060808384],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008898581,0.0005973776,0.0008043417,0.0016179798,0.007595069,0.0012296358,0.0038440092,0.00028316426,0.00331902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049276097,0.00059286895,0.00044839544,0.0053125354,0.024680149,0.0025470154,0.000094291034,0.0007026765,0.00005085407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003495092,0.00019372201,0.82918,0.00003959605,0.000041782525,0.00079637015,0.07350554,0.00039436584,0.000084651176,0.06700214,0.0039664744,0.024791863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012936281,0.002439322,0.7261325,0.00095197576,0.0004045426,0.0022560207,0.10604352,0.008010145,0.000030790816,0.008998923,0.14140992,0.0020287004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6129836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8949704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2819868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072823246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049213637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547959588","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.00502.x","title":"Sexual orientation, work, and income in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Demographic economics; Educational attainment; Orientation (vector space); Work (physics); Psychology; Economics; Social psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0828284863006427,"score_gpt":0.19379874203877862,"score_spread":0.11097025573813592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547959588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99541444,0.00019659214,0.000009857243,0.0017110439,0.0013537663,0.00014277882,0.00006199275,0.0000025665934,0.0011069884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99815327,0.00024575667,0.00016211788,0.0006303128,0.00030598362,0.0000042920187,0.0000054229454,0.000021524409,0.0004713165],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983432,0.00009488608,0.00061464444,0.00024014706,0.0000048691822,0.000702253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741817,0.00013958054,0.00030599043,0.00017136765,0.0001622327,0.0018026581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005728166,0.00016642116,0.00038142165,0.00042858234,0.00033890968,0.00005816104,0.0003495298,0.00012040391,0.00008364983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002028632,0.00021661814,0.00004205315,0.00024216318,0.00026675928,0.0003679346,0.0000115887005,0.00028931015,0.000002187376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011237322,0.0000029147025,0.9053438,0.0000064993606,0.000024037477,0.00027840343,0.0110246325,0.0015900757,3.2025423e-7,0.0807603,0.00038653368,0.0005712709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012088085,0.00013619414,0.8997869,0.0000492287,0.000024146122,0.00030839304,0.035792127,0.000341981,0.0000023347548,0.03233353,0.029304212,0.0007121415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04842677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062889648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02543914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549258081","doi":"","title":"The impacts of the 1988 tax reform on married women's labour supply in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Labour supply; Labour economics; Tax reform; Income tax; Tax rate; State income tax; Earned income tax credit; Demographic economics; Tax credit; Monetary economics; Public economics","score_opus":0.016712066152625923,"score_gpt":0.2868842914080659,"score_spread":0.27017222525543994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549258081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.910454,0.00007090557,5.5415327e-8,0.0021871976,0.0008688178,0.00080740894,0.00023812773,0.0000081190465,0.0853654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857964,0.010350782,0.000015341991,0.00024040858,0.00013754988,0.00013678531,0.0000092524215,0.000034228044,0.0032792457],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960014,0.0006352729,0.00065577705,0.0005499556,0.0007528188,0.0014047713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750483,0.0006514381,0.00028954117,0.0011319468,0.00015560554,0.0002666422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004076583,0.00026027174,0.00043798104,0.00018951054,0.0005750742,0.00014547676,0.001942285,0.0003514783,0.00004443619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000966945,0.00018729268,0.0001175759,0.0003814689,0.000700823,0.00006563379,0.00077805977,0.0019582107,0.0000020878401],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069561874,0.00045862392,0.6663652,0.00057721406,0.0003625931,0.00010837829,0.07191019,0.076270096,0.000076214914,0.10550891,0.00039505702,0.07727192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010157574,0.000091431975,0.76131827,0.00037368812,0.000004756439,0.0000012548824,0.17859076,0.00057290535,0.000033603035,0.02071207,0.036710225,0.00057530304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92042816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106680565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0259028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024063274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9814694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551079243","doi":"10.3386/w20444","title":"Is the 'Quarter of Birth' Endogenous? Evidence From One Million Siblings in Taiwan","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Academia Sinica","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Demography; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.409652580922891,"score_gpt":0.48216947671322724,"score_spread":0.07251689579033627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551079243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3211768,0.006088258,0.000044774017,0.010502218,0.0013671619,0.0018628007,0.00068196363,0.00002429477,0.65825176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98782605,0.008617709,0.00014679009,0.000057220976,0.0009658745,0.00004710582,0.000102604,0.000023141545,0.0022135102],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948665,0.0006463503,0.00086133543,0.0005060478,0.0026579553,0.00046181536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940949,0.002586175,0.0004934123,0.00040419243,0.002325624,0.00009566622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0128611,0.0001684502,0.00050984486,0.00085441046,0.0002487079,0.000076749675,0.0011078846,0.00047392063,0.00065760245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002599629,0.00015103382,0.00018741471,0.0005060128,0.0008053243,0.00019104812,0.00013680944,0.000711168,0.00007484583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035740586,0.00079245237,0.43598953,0.0011243923,0.0010718195,0.000013056572,0.097881265,0.0013973444,0.0034028303,0.3402012,0.11152925,0.006239451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001121541,0.00036352468,0.09066553,0.0015669387,0.000065087814,0.0000038013638,0.018604795,0.0016665908,0.00036054742,0.82845646,0.056312855,0.0008123208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08831163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021713838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6666493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014668046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006874803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551349177","doi":"10.7202/010137ar","title":"Les aspirations de fécondité des étudiants et étudiantes de l’Université de Sherbrooke","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.02129674131413403,"score_gpt":0.2503734833197866,"score_spread":0.22907674200565256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551349177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93718946,0.031299345,0.0063973474,0.0042483807,0.0005402419,0.0003291736,0.00019427718,0.00021163764,0.019590143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94012755,0.04731801,0.0070614815,0.0021952565,0.00032745628,0.000035186316,0.000032061114,0.00008245893,0.0028205211],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622816,0.0005336026,0.000405169,0.00059993524,0.00039212478,0.0018409945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978573,0.0003111519,0.00020847286,0.00042206465,0.00021246463,0.0009885763],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011010801,0.0004926876,0.0004317172,0.0005041118,0.002577843,0.00017134979,0.0007406629,0.00095023,0.00017055485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032438803,0.0006114278,0.0005197873,0.0026347213,0.004151149,0.00063070667,0.00009197785,0.00079771725,0.000053300842],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002625191,0.00039314982,0.6344396,0.00013209638,0.00036164213,0.00030179002,0.109373994,0.003717319,0.0011416343,0.24403782,0.0030144749,0.0030602054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019493727,0.00028929627,0.78125215,0.00033242165,0.0006372787,0.0001273609,0.118017755,0.00023358494,0.00025806972,0.054757494,0.040961847,0.001183369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08044609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6148002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53435415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044146897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026611264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551735044","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1815910","title":"Discrimination in the Provision of Social Services to the Poor: A Field Experimental Study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Business; Public economics; Psychology; Actuarial science; Political science; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01775839027057892,"score_gpt":0.31250922607613074,"score_spread":0.29475083580555184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551735044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99443525,0.00037039976,0.00016140706,0.0032898004,0.00012306919,0.00035268944,7.7822205e-7,0.000005760769,0.0012608336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989945,0.00021061675,0.0000075458834,0.00028520104,0.00023751653,0.000011607078,8.8472854e-7,0.0000047821786,0.00024731315],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822336,0.00034727153,0.0001807944,0.000097056865,0.00048898224,0.00066254905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997068,0.000053775482,0.000087261455,0.00007475626,0.000054922493,0.000022468394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018895414,0.00006898281,0.000088774075,0.00005553896,0.00086289836,0.000037946964,0.00046727085,0.000041128347,0.0000071668346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021718603,0.000040779836,0.000051190196,0.00028226234,0.000045229972,0.00012990304,0.000030004147,0.00049763767,0.0000028427992],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005810883,0.0007486389,0.045040566,0.0000031605516,0.000028904826,0.000003260459,0.88028634,0.000018448349,0.00021671638,0.07108611,0.00011001646,0.0023997151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032838807,0.00065369246,0.055127315,0.0000045046245,0.000010928397,0.000011117376,0.93851644,0.000031858202,0.000018595147,0.0047330153,0.00049922673,0.000064897205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027535034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056007795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06635309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002688613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063239835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9612176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552179849","doi":"","title":"Why Did Employment and Earnings Rise Among Lone Mothers During the 1980s and 1990s","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Quarter (Canadian coin); Baby boom; Demographic economics; Boom; Economics; Maturity (psychological); Population; Labour economics; Demography; Psychology; Geography; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03838986031316142,"score_gpt":0.34218484214263045,"score_spread":0.303794981829469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552179849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97692424,0.006080755,0.000009550964,0.010192955,0.000056958786,0.0003282083,0.0000063523894,0.000050244205,0.0063507375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751712,0.015815597,0.000032071162,0.00023777613,0.0002504202,0.000047799796,0.0000011874433,0.000018612975,0.008425312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714816,0.0004524572,0.00024114556,0.0004178538,0.0009136019,0.00082680216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870485,0.000600533,0.00003986043,0.00021357078,0.00026321242,0.0001779832],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015256256,0.00017866124,0.00029457128,0.00008432708,0.0028377424,0.00027414196,0.0002257226,0.000088440414,0.000043430937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005532246,0.00012280299,0.00005763971,0.0005589933,0.004918274,0.00037016737,0.00034469218,0.00039087495,0.000006772216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061298124,0.0000611419,0.9589743,0.00007294377,0.00022685307,0.000020551885,0.021865023,0.000017966122,0.00014833325,0.013749249,0.0042199255,0.00058238476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002761403,0.00007739283,0.8853623,0.00002925864,0.000025727297,9.781072e-7,0.041707113,0.000033453616,0.000009074777,0.0031480873,0.06916651,0.00016395567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010955606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038543817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07361202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103232465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004338618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554322207","doi":"10.3138/cpp.34.1.025","title":"An Evaluation of the Working Income Tax Benefit","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Economics; Subsidy; Unemployment; Labour economics; State income tax; Income tax; Government (linguistics); Welfare; Gross income; Structural unemployment; Tax credit; Population; Tax reform; Public economics; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.06713966415149354,"score_gpt":0.31157815022459817,"score_spread":0.24443848607310464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554322207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8911649,0.00007345092,0.000004755486,0.006406442,0.0002930568,0.00018288665,0.000036434456,0.000016965458,0.10182109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997376,0.000032403812,0.000030229769,0.0012805875,0.0004186317,0.000010030711,0.000007356722,0.000009378909,0.00083536585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985204,0.0002039557,0.00014341899,0.00013798376,0.0005264876,0.0004678083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875414,0.000022909842,0.00007800488,0.00033272494,0.00030378305,0.0005084418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095625455,0.00007222507,0.000089247675,0.00028864303,0.0009131282,0.000056877398,0.0005410588,0.0001091881,0.000074634816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004917589,0.00006540683,0.000047585614,0.0011761417,0.00028866468,0.00020276816,0.000017197794,0.00009534196,0.000007867659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.8124372e-7,0.000014298393,0.5725025,0.0000017145057,0.0000125030165,8.459801e-7,0.01603201,0.00008056644,0.000010523995,0.3938739,0.0010669514,0.016403822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001561483,0.000007792955,0.93506116,0.0000063311986,0.000009491429,0.0000019303038,0.0024759679,0.0007326051,0.0000019187423,0.010332838,0.05109884,0.00011498891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.762061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9513345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38354105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009930033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012937871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99265784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554595211","doi":"","title":"Family spending power","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Clothing; Pooling; Scale (ratio); Demographic economics; Engel curve; Standard of living; Sibling; Per capita income; Economies of scale; Labour economics; Public economics; Geography; Sociology; Microeconomics; Demography","score_opus":0.06136650512543573,"score_gpt":0.3469982909045776,"score_spread":0.2856317857791419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554595211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45833743,0.00022898409,0.0000046534756,0.0002118599,0.0012683074,0.0005053948,0.00005095859,0.0000627118,0.5393297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.939758,0.03861755,0.00063261954,0.00014197892,0.0005522969,0.00008882034,0.000030696254,0.00008012701,0.020097882],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953722,0.0006603701,0.0006482121,0.0011085097,0.0006633618,0.0015473898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769145,0.0005442919,0.00018944504,0.0010102041,0.00016227868,0.00040235725],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036666212,0.00035214098,0.00057253713,0.0006479508,0.00063953595,0.00043892642,0.0014627379,0.00090502156,0.0005702115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006489558,0.00042272892,0.0002520748,0.00029146983,0.00079803163,0.00016576429,0.0010986363,0.0023597619,0.000115959105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020456413,0.0014645132,0.4680101,0.00057059823,0.00067707425,0.00060449744,0.1063781,0.018588342,0.00026992778,0.0882218,0.0034579919,0.3115525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015293309,0.00018166078,0.25708535,0.00052329974,0.00003073895,0.000006494697,0.11651037,0.010679386,0.0000112603675,0.028047364,0.58267003,0.002724734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014980446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002562893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.579212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021581433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090476504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555634732","doi":"10.7202/602157ar","title":"Comportements de fécondité des Québécoises, allocations familiales et impôts : résultats et simulations d’un modèle de choix discrets portant sur les années 1975-1987","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09033368590207339,"score_gpt":0.3112641227606208,"score_spread":0.22093043685854744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555634732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.965937,0.0028257803,0.009826802,0.015232115,0.00047742296,0.00076691434,0.0013340119,0.0002028718,0.0033970624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789455,0.0066988985,0.006215104,0.0051885364,0.00031276917,0.000052649582,0.0005367539,0.00006484173,0.001984983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957481,0.0009672895,0.0010680044,0.0007538905,0.00024048315,0.0012222282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970473,0.0008739451,0.00050884346,0.00057277497,0.00035972783,0.0006374203],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012924351,0.0006031731,0.0006415841,0.00018628725,0.0012955143,0.0003414913,0.00068213395,0.00055238395,0.00018372646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005402266,0.00067838194,0.0002932373,0.00049804756,0.0008342028,0.001151108,0.00009350347,0.0005004794,0.000032636504],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003658627,0.0013016581,0.21034576,0.00009163872,0.00030977055,0.000041926214,0.06625388,0.05258782,0.0019080921,0.6568604,0.0006590176,0.0096034445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012405764,0.00022290408,0.75206965,0.00023408393,0.0002659083,0.000022626207,0.014755463,0.03340016,0.00016865309,0.1586307,0.037804917,0.0011843443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11566859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31851542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5417239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007230797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024469187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557459808","doi":"","title":"Acces a un regime de pension et taux de remplacement des gains chez les couples canadiens","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06986376841623873,"score_gpt":0.35496575533329217,"score_spread":0.28510198691705346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557459808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9253158,0.0008508071,0.000054187894,0.0025696382,0.0007609978,0.0009078228,0.00015786484,0.00005610199,0.069326796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8616058,0.12370463,0.005035419,0.00029182402,0.00043844146,0.00016607698,0.0000860249,0.00009796528,0.008573795],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928105,0.0017205527,0.00087228435,0.0013682549,0.00058520143,0.002643209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586606,0.0012202626,0.00038395097,0.0011101351,0.00044030035,0.0009793047],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010318051,0.000580849,0.000766055,0.0004384657,0.0015648498,0.00043446536,0.0016555409,0.0014214864,0.00034863743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016283871,0.0006712937,0.00029298995,0.00038822027,0.003296691,0.0002318096,0.00111329,0.0034007784,0.000021426791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002076438,0.0006855669,0.6022241,0.0004361817,0.0003800935,0.00028974243,0.10311462,0.03253114,0.0022562006,0.06125529,0.00031241888,0.19630696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017663995,0.00040944538,0.5552836,0.0009617587,0.00011506758,0.00009695751,0.13586828,0.07386255,0.00028002667,0.03296687,0.19601864,0.002370404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11935924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62193125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.502572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006361682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069756233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1559574347","doi":"10.1108/s0731-9053(2013)0000032010","title":"The Collective Marriage Matching Model: Identification, Estimation, and Testing","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Marriage market; Economics; Identification (biology); Estimation; Econometrics; Labour economics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03407538024408464,"score_gpt":0.27276742526766257,"score_spread":0.23869204502357794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1559574347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006219184,0.00021219852,0.043851264,0.0004616451,0.00027004248,0.0005817652,0.000017101896,0.00012477758,0.95385927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034201223,0.00035946563,0.0067443773,0.0001366639,0.00013063011,0.000030716015,0.000012638698,0.000035875506,0.9583484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987205,0.000041935047,0.00032291788,0.00030612567,0.00037139998,0.00023711997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983791,0.00055141945,0.00024381845,0.00023191444,0.00049919635,0.000094549134],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072376913,0.00018605389,0.00016610978,0.0000612236,0.0022652794,0.000580825,0.00026532382,0.00022607844,0.00006919356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030856006,0.00014695528,0.000040786683,0.00007179299,0.00032863664,0.00020304571,0.00006855776,0.00021433641,0.000074596064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000102859,0.0000032076186,0.00007472139,0.000010575256,0.000029910268,4.344613e-7,0.009699168,0.000893385,0.0000059525664,0.98047185,0.0036704945,0.0051392787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062681174,0.0000058672167,0.00056544336,0.000030484363,0.000038175476,8.701804e-7,0.0033146073,0.077364504,4.6785144e-7,0.91482,0.0035611088,0.00023579763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085930276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015891356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07647112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018034132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047570444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1559817281","doi":"","title":"Taxing Choices: The Intersection of Class, Gender, Parenthood and the Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intersection (aeronautics); Class (philosophy); Sociology; Gender studies; Geography; Epistemology; Philosophy; Cartography","score_opus":0.02977518160929328,"score_gpt":0.2687732984450842,"score_spread":0.23899811683579092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1559817281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634506,0.0017142581,0.000023902938,0.0014131303,0.0006596492,0.0002569581,0.000016685533,0.000018281753,0.032446504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976422,0.00066462235,0.000018353316,0.0012558693,0.00013479908,0.000040548348,8.041401e-7,0.0000064358537,0.00023634236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990864,0.00011286605,0.00014088232,0.00013925829,0.00015963706,0.00036094704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994323,0.00013516244,0.000070372924,0.00013293559,0.000103720464,0.00012548552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005925408,0.000093267125,0.00016219672,0.000035708497,0.0012692055,0.000052170086,0.0001828648,0.000044076987,0.0000066099847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015001342,0.000057471676,0.000037223897,0.00021618074,0.0013297969,0.00008014978,0.00003579456,0.00010817565,0.000002314444],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054684415,0.000006046961,0.003520558,0.000016551625,0.0001450171,0.000001631492,0.36991003,0.000043048316,0.0000032147716,0.62613225,0.000051656643,0.00016453516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048162695,0.00002031433,0.0038443434,0.000015615109,0.000025209278,7.7816287e-7,0.92618287,0.0000074090335,0.0000016264391,0.05995264,0.009380319,0.00008727117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05517849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70522743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.650049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005800539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031683224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9761831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561632678","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.923633","title":"A Study of Effective Marginal Tax Rates in Quebec (Une Analyse des Taux Marginaux Effectifs d'Imposition au Quebec)","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Microsimulation; Economics; Redistribution (election); Demographic economics; Population; Labour economics; Political science; Demography","score_opus":0.007417087636555246,"score_gpt":0.269356234162359,"score_spread":0.26193914652580375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561632678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831757,0.009999569,0.002925789,0.0006581136,0.00082514365,0.0011118988,0.000014830839,0.00002763777,0.0012613499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884131,0.0020061121,0.00008215069,0.000022434668,0.00081119966,0.000048929836,0.000014677845,0.000050484272,0.008550918],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913832,0.0025893967,0.00089917914,0.0005627393,0.0008035001,0.003761999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980611,0.00039267348,0.0006784937,0.0002708812,0.00040498778,0.00019183052],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047874213,0.0005215385,0.00082714943,0.000603385,0.0009155151,0.00019420638,0.00051622983,0.00035113323,0.000034298828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010688598,0.0005289055,0.00033893072,0.0027727445,0.0008467475,0.0009138283,0.00006671134,0.0023899158,0.000024563393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043854612,0.003836248,0.8387927,0.00011561116,0.0007706288,0.00013099523,0.03988976,0.0041486286,0.000941525,0.07328369,0.00007573897,0.037575927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032248406,0.0022696983,0.7320182,0.00018915908,0.0004599894,0.00010459762,0.1856501,0.00047062355,0.000059745045,0.07493081,0.000115914954,0.00050635234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9324294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99599856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14576033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015837349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008650686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565186932","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.00500.x","title":"Does the labour supply of wives respond to husbands' wages? Canadian evidence from micro data and grouped data","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Ordinary least squares; Wage; Estimator; Econometrics; Labour economics; Wage dispersion; Yield (engineering); Labour supply; Demographic economics; Efficiency wage; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1981744200715964,"score_gpt":0.24012686183674126,"score_spread":0.04195244176514484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565186932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97424924,0.0010487465,0.000020461857,0.013804283,0.0015083697,0.00034729633,0.00876143,0.000003889501,0.0002562778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993034,0.002751652,0.0010034831,0.0014185802,0.0008637623,0.0000038415774,0.000115261755,0.0000368929,0.00077251566],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734896,0.00023715441,0.00082263566,0.00062497595,0.000013281851,0.00095296785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99368197,0.00069189415,0.0005000252,0.0016329437,0.00028123203,0.0032119446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020510128,0.00027114365,0.0005936658,0.0005677813,0.0008573074,0.00021465874,0.0037677162,0.00021512625,0.0002178487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015419624,0.00023032665,0.00007331977,0.00026181186,0.0007534168,0.0012202043,0.00017421547,0.00038625213,0.000008101795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018030268,0.000020952226,0.8202583,0.000051338626,0.00050129567,0.00062497274,0.11394644,0.0005932554,0.00022872721,0.046465922,0.013454713,0.0036737416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012431283,0.00036588157,0.5331969,0.00052144995,0.0002402883,0.0003017224,0.062513724,0.00117809,0.00008475612,0.033997145,0.36493364,0.0014232735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98716897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99995244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35147893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011824778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012250199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99334943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565351187","doi":"","title":"Driven Apart: Women's Employment Equality and Child Care in Canadian Public Policy . Annis May Timpson.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Public policy; Gender equality; Political science; Care work; Parental leave; Economic growth; Labour economics; Gender studies; Economics; Sociology; Work (physics); Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.020377095130295265,"score_gpt":0.2948731280002518,"score_spread":0.2744960328699565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565351187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85294664,0.00013537786,0.000013876064,0.013526654,0.00011064449,0.00024836193,0.000050272345,0.00005133599,0.13291681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99581355,0.00017496821,0.00011463402,0.0027655228,0.00014092811,0.000024131798,0.000016943179,0.000010864629,0.0009384681],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823,0.000107974214,0.00017792414,0.00027843105,0.0002613504,0.0009443595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889654,0.000016033808,0.000032922893,0.00018060076,0.00007282411,0.00080106105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040097907,0.00012913538,0.00016176663,0.00024763285,0.0005490943,0.00016160618,0.0002180895,0.00013704541,0.000096845084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008072127,0.00012866395,0.000029826237,0.0005764463,0.00018642428,0.000198246,0.000044647513,0.00013101893,0.000022589315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002094459,0.00004479342,0.50265616,0.000013305809,0.000012981684,0.000007790071,0.14612754,0.00005229151,0.0000016380988,0.3494832,0.0000995055,0.0014987116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000896453,0.000088475,0.6373228,0.000018434595,0.000004866393,0.0000014697855,0.1702898,0.000021289383,0.000002590896,0.0050878264,0.18583293,0.00043308808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91266644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34439534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021801116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023693838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5700916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566433786","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-4085.2005.00267.x","title":"Pensions and Fertility Incentives","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; Pension; Incentive; Labour supply; Labour economics; Overlapping generations model; Microeconomics; Finance; Population; Medicine","score_opus":0.1404992784350386,"score_gpt":0.22383599443996693,"score_spread":0.08333671600492834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566433786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846279,0.0012138803,0.00004547304,0.0021819116,0.004479849,0.00039366982,0.00040964567,0.000008293429,0.0066393465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995354,0.0018528439,0.00064198417,0.0006402398,0.0005459833,0.000009920947,0.000021575552,0.00004997234,0.0008834576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971596,0.00032428678,0.0009444884,0.0005483689,0.0000057039624,0.0010175271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946433,0.00018433362,0.00086383836,0.00048326555,0.00044505243,0.0033802183],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016671475,0.00039386406,0.0008837931,0.00062905444,0.0006569014,0.0003795207,0.000764913,0.00067355955,0.00021350705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061917305,0.00050715846,0.00029055405,0.00011050483,0.00077535736,0.00031420303,0.00008086261,0.0010477381,0.0000073192823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004469731,0.00003256081,0.21679923,0.00014523717,0.00042130286,0.000236501,0.036139287,0.0025635094,0.0000037766736,0.740238,0.0013854213,0.0019904631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007476867,0.00015488676,0.11354202,0.00032143702,0.0002143199,0.000111692454,0.020536367,0.0006091406,0.000004404715,0.79222167,0.0702372,0.0012991922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5155973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4815872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034256987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013564335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568009433","doi":"","title":"Female Employment Rates and Labour Market Attachment in Rural Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Labour economics; Economics; Rural area; Demographic economics; Market segmentation; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.030084579849833478,"score_gpt":0.33438197120145285,"score_spread":0.3042973913516194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568009433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88617617,0.00034559306,5.4540124e-7,0.0008159437,0.00056033826,0.0007493668,0.00009737242,0.000017317943,0.11123738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9362402,0.045996036,0.00016301798,0.00019625678,0.00021920077,0.00017126794,0.00003861534,0.000037501086,0.016937893],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639475,0.00068853935,0.00055688637,0.0007086563,0.00048050738,0.0011706543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984826,0.0004399145,0.00012842547,0.0005062277,0.0001090926,0.00033373164],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031201376,0.00028481917,0.0004849337,0.00030563478,0.00031749718,0.00023231028,0.0006363269,0.00037340916,0.00019412159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002658222,0.000327717,0.00006264083,0.00021505858,0.00038327035,0.000088545916,0.00076536054,0.0011596787,0.0000018245546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044306023,0.000099073026,0.96730095,0.00008435022,0.00004550482,0.00008848749,0.004676349,0.0016159671,0.0000039015436,0.001206622,0.000319104,0.024515375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079947815,0.000047514673,0.83365625,0.00021291348,0.0000063152593,0.0000027254225,0.072200075,0.002481873,0.0000031095321,0.001854861,0.088067,0.000667886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66568786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9684438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3027559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039094044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038504617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568015471","doi":"","title":"Emploi des meres canadiennes apres la naissance d'un enfant et trajectoires des gains de leurs homologues occupees de facon continue, 1983 a 2004","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.07826174287844168,"score_gpt":0.34987180140366075,"score_spread":0.2716100585252191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568015471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9207388,0.0054194005,0.000051258845,0.0003364051,0.0005169603,0.00087448047,0.00045258002,0.00012375,0.07148637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78618675,0.204589,0.004470466,0.00021395665,0.00031000396,0.0002825691,0.00006716388,0.00012114542,0.0037589187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895252,0.0037078154,0.0011255067,0.0016508538,0.0005494983,0.0034411203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99421895,0.0030131184,0.0004003798,0.0009734122,0.00040159773,0.0009925409],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051188925,0.00088176085,0.0012514074,0.0006292612,0.0020022714,0.00045569998,0.0020434654,0.0012675802,0.00006670392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023894105,0.0009985707,0.00049494946,0.0005409991,0.010709765,0.0004681359,0.0007007269,0.0024465683,0.000012772056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016813901,0.00053077785,0.7220756,0.00037815457,0.00049289165,0.00054152077,0.113364875,0.023082001,0.00062668073,0.012232526,0.00026528147,0.12624155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011935912,0.00035120852,0.8378555,0.00089072005,0.000075835094,0.00020077753,0.089151196,0.0032177784,0.00044263856,0.029089386,0.035771813,0.0017595249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20476322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64408404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4393208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040262355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048811664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568025745","doi":"10.1111/caje.12409","title":"Child cash benefits and family expenditures: Evidence from the National Child Benefit","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Exploit; Cash; Public economics; Demographic economics; Income Support; Earned income tax credit; Economics; Child health; Household income; Low income; Labour economics; Business; Tax credit; Finance; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.0965982074450081,"score_gpt":0.21180414901836048,"score_spread":0.11520594157335237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568025745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97896916,0.004010576,0.0000044645167,0.007443965,0.0020776412,0.0003197452,0.00050854345,0.000006506356,0.0066593983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916933,0.0025984002,0.0001181801,0.0035803346,0.0016834376,0.000007179426,0.000015761716,0.000033892655,0.00026952542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998178,0.00009892195,0.00060125196,0.00039136954,0.000014854987,0.0007156027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970357,0.00053804717,0.00047463525,0.00027345272,0.00026197996,0.0014161767],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011373787,0.00025447644,0.00042966855,0.00026915633,0.0008005307,0.0003455867,0.00090691337,0.00024416356,0.0002575871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033308603,0.00025700193,0.00016829322,0.000107677595,0.00028800228,0.000726387,0.00003290038,0.00049387605,0.00003284287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038748585,0.000011370972,0.26501727,0.0000127635885,0.00022562673,0.000029524705,0.02458374,0.0098934155,0.00000615979,0.69586086,0.0016893881,0.0026311122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016150221,0.00033809824,0.6507699,0.0010543468,0.00013121904,0.00033559147,0.03719007,0.0014263522,0.000013127036,0.14940012,0.15632735,0.0013987981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.542571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54646075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016278903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025513975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568084423","doi":"10.7202/1121109ar","title":"Big Sister: How Extreme Feminism has Betrayed the Fight for Sexual Equality. Neil Boyd","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Sister; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2339216077805318,"score_gpt":0.4066482272250617,"score_spread":0.1727266194445299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568084423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14865562,0.042873815,0.111487836,0.1435355,0.052059896,0.008661918,0.0012353559,0.001427627,0.49006245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98515904,0.0006487636,0.0010435579,0.005068522,0.005324433,0.00010775973,0.00003425978,0.00003723163,0.0025764585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959224,0.0004501891,0.00056193984,0.0006687938,0.00093544513,0.00146126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963332,0.0024020064,0.000121365905,0.00024624853,0.00068386033,0.00021333044],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024376635,0.00040107672,0.00058900105,0.00006778008,0.0039996025,0.00033103905,0.0006413896,0.0005117669,0.000010860408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033419786,0.00030291392,0.00022891528,0.0008018182,0.002196166,0.00019586267,0.00020960103,0.0005868637,0.000009208535],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009480887,0.00031867274,0.0039156154,0.00053704454,0.00031094503,0.00006819383,0.39689648,0.0000015361555,0.00019711343,0.53559446,0.057060115,0.005004993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006904029,0.00010217193,0.01009062,0.000025051038,0.00054567726,0.000004006429,0.64138705,0.0000187796,0.0000071184654,0.009423858,0.33720267,0.00050261186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029702604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074486234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8365034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032675662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017449791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568730581","doi":"","title":"\"And We Still Ain't Satisfied\": A Report on Gender and Income Inequality in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journals @ The Mount (Mount Saint Vincent University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Poverty; Inequality; Gender gap; Wage; Economics; Labour economics; Cohort; Demography; Sociology; Economic growth; Medicine","score_opus":0.028432376599061164,"score_gpt":0.2531739720896766,"score_spread":0.22474159549061545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568730581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928007,0.00047662779,0.00021359755,0.0020458235,0.00038598976,0.00029197635,0.000022978653,0.000017080354,0.0037451924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99550337,0.003455128,0.00007953273,0.00064723747,0.000050204282,6.6658254e-7,0.0000016668813,0.000011146804,0.000251042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972536,0.000783585,0.00037604693,0.00035841716,0.00070565456,0.00052269513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865794,0.00030453512,0.00030026483,0.00030317853,0.00014055327,0.00029354074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001994047,0.00021369444,0.00030374434,0.00023272041,0.0006647112,0.00011037015,0.00029774694,0.00011465238,0.000064932545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028708903,0.00017903028,0.00005528498,0.00058542605,0.00021680401,0.0002237181,0.00010551817,0.0004755121,0.000002037212],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000337155,0.000048671474,0.4369111,0.000017135922,0.0000457669,0.0007504415,0.0057065617,0.00042783024,0.000025793535,0.5556548,0.00006478477,0.0003134076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007857264,0.000037349717,0.6633846,0.00008775307,0.00004578942,0.00006430656,0.061215937,0.00022086188,0.0000045323904,0.005450777,0.26833382,0.00036853738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8275371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8655646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55020404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01824397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017329768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98552483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570951878","doi":"10.7202/602030ar","title":"L’incidence du salaire minimum sur le marché du travail des adolescents au Canada : une reconsidération des résultats empiriques","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.03641161441970515,"score_gpt":0.24794000221553997,"score_spread":0.21152838779583483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570951878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9765771,0.001493312,0.0006118359,0.014409337,0.001430082,0.0005152735,0.00012982378,0.000111044305,0.004722179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856816,0.0050721653,0.0008089413,0.0035103115,0.001021463,0.000020658026,0.000044896864,0.00004517028,0.0037947823],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960708,0.0008964964,0.00087491627,0.00075454736,0.0002482618,0.0011549876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977172,0.00042755375,0.00037401295,0.00040981694,0.0004882738,0.0005831572],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001094732,0.00052791944,0.00060038525,0.000092846545,0.0012649245,0.0002397583,0.00060867553,0.00046262328,0.000072984105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007098785,0.0005615965,0.00017952769,0.0005456514,0.0013172124,0.0011728152,0.00006316081,0.00037411394,0.000032755604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013029193,0.0006860982,0.68956333,0.00039413353,0.000119537035,0.000116124174,0.13308692,0.00053642807,0.0005066812,0.019195141,0.009937021,0.14572828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081801094,0.0002004744,0.9368159,0.0005854221,0.000054339864,0.000030174528,0.021791726,0.0012883077,0.0002250498,0.020340595,0.017029421,0.00082058314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9456381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99579376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24725254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026278615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009568447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571050306","doi":"","title":"Social Assistance Use in Canada: National and Provincial Trends in Incidence, Entry and Exit","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Welfare; Demographic economics; Legislation; Longitudinal data; Incidence (geometry); Geography; Socioeconomics; Demography; Economic growth; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04315603686805511,"score_gpt":0.32786714258573263,"score_spread":0.28471110571767755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571050306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9483105,0.00013201562,5.824255e-7,0.00058719923,0.00021050093,0.00033703554,0.00013281858,0.000008886593,0.050280493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99220455,0.006139267,0.00013632244,0.00009100222,0.00022162298,0.00008109509,0.00003866519,0.000020240353,0.0010672659],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970482,0.00036917892,0.00051236956,0.000739133,0.0005860111,0.000745108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904144,0.0003638388,0.00013831383,0.00016553054,0.00012172754,0.00016915397],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020122454,0.00021115049,0.00039984568,0.00087648234,0.00027777188,0.00022092741,0.00036439742,0.00042476083,0.000021892694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005789182,0.0002654384,0.000039841707,0.00045221345,0.00056032045,0.00022734095,0.00045166613,0.0012955507,3.6673813e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007528577,0.000087615015,0.9524338,0.00007186271,0.000019286956,0.000079502024,0.0073614377,0.0017077487,0.0000034289483,0.010432332,0.00014556272,0.02758211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060682883,0.0000108693275,0.9836552,0.00008177333,0.0000020082327,0.0000011083517,0.006358384,0.0011728983,3.1791856e-7,0.005007045,0.0028159833,0.0002875489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7754727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22245124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012859632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571269868","doi":"10.3138/cpp.35.3.344","title":"An Analysis of Effective Marginal Tax Rates in Quebec","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Microsimulation; Economics; Redistribution (election); Demographic economics; Population; Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Distribution (mathematics); Income tax; Public economics; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.01142879832494894,"score_gpt":0.29519900672041416,"score_spread":0.28377020839546524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571269868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9563045,0.000057207733,0.000033426808,0.0068095173,0.00005819241,0.00018253791,0.00013522802,0.000019355031,0.03640003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972439,0.000022768403,0.000039547824,0.0015410053,0.00015356843,0.0000075128455,0.000045921344,0.000005443223,0.0009403603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985504,0.00024723288,0.00017234973,0.00021019613,0.00018181729,0.00063796155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987656,0.000051076448,0.00006317083,0.00023121921,0.00013441083,0.00075452315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050510647,0.00010302751,0.00024661334,0.002129579,0.00019212168,0.00012208002,0.0003601395,0.00013124045,0.00007334442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032504034,0.00011389678,0.00008335565,0.0041917283,0.00018268563,0.00034643197,0.0000052533974,0.00010452195,0.0000056390368],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027932829,0.000051525483,0.54671574,0.000002600102,0.00008916252,0.000010795819,0.012186632,0.00009011055,0.000028551556,0.4152055,0.0006500725,0.024966516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012371555,0.00003082123,0.9847333,0.000002399747,0.00003436724,1.2350174e-7,0.004186013,0.0007354848,0.0000018589673,0.0017364238,0.008291498,0.00012398233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99339473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99930215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43801758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00126354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058419174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572508825","doi":"10.3386/w11932","title":"The Long-Term Effects of a Generous Income Support Program: Unemployment Insurance in New Brunswick and Maine, 1940-1991","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Term (time); Income Support; Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Actuarial science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.1156473215443705,"score_gpt":0.455380346080361,"score_spread":0.33973302453599047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572508825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88528585,0.0038806426,0.0000037261304,0.000531357,0.0007673875,0.0023766255,0.000055040415,0.000022505936,0.10707687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724496,0.011295425,0.00014719597,0.0000111764175,0.0006236271,0.00009475455,0.00024132774,0.000034697696,0.015102202],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958833,0.00036360894,0.0008404716,0.00046698196,0.0018314546,0.00061420695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675435,0.001415014,0.00041181484,0.00028232107,0.0009768773,0.00015964796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005532648,0.00021106967,0.0005098858,0.00050483097,0.00029724964,0.00010621882,0.00065183337,0.0003990372,0.000015505128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007759825,0.00018699515,0.00012251786,0.0004008899,0.00095750735,0.000114832335,0.0001758687,0.00053943705,0.000007078538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041817642,0.00020626021,0.911868,0.00048691808,0.00011786348,0.000018192646,0.00069543725,0.00012528455,0.00000914982,0.07134929,0.005174218,0.00990758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007546133,0.00020833487,0.96135336,0.00017110335,0.00001207152,0.0000059336844,0.00011082036,0.00005001697,0.000009998726,0.02937653,0.0077307275,0.00021650684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09602949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16151303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09197467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001575562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016908458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98866475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572831179","doi":"10.3982/qe353","title":"Altruistically motivated transfers under uncertainty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Consumption (sociology); Microeconomics; Incentive; Markov perfect equilibrium; Limit (mathematics); Nash equilibrium; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03971910181425162,"score_gpt":0.3009847565784082,"score_spread":0.26126565476415653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572831179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84670824,0.000018296661,0.07388479,0.0013476044,0.000702749,0.00019131669,0.000051493505,0.000092906805,0.07700258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946739,0.00021508793,0.0033297744,0.0009710012,0.00012478746,0.0000077249915,0.000026551028,0.000022338636,0.00062880234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998635,0.00025932636,0.00027451894,0.00031725675,0.000097373304,0.00041654365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988161,0.000614033,0.00007104451,0.00017457345,0.0001367071,0.00018758676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007348102,0.00015453513,0.0002428008,0.00007226219,0.00038963597,0.000090525384,0.000269443,0.00013467381,0.00013909143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035129787,0.0001657973,0.000091542446,0.00015602092,0.0004964937,0.00016091322,0.000015925867,0.00014632706,0.00017029648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017527087,0.000036694077,0.0041713123,0.0000049477158,0.000038835406,3.3796e-7,0.006918685,0.0075706113,0.00004158182,0.98046947,0.00016385426,0.0005661458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022520085,0.0007907162,0.10804497,0.000035787354,0.00011295305,0.000001141126,0.12041274,0.11895244,0.000040526837,0.5639086,0.0839273,0.0015208623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010342266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039754333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41656092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001965112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022966106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6761018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573748388","doi":"","title":"The Dynamics of US Labor Force Attachment","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Multinomial distribution; Duration (music); Current Population Survey; Estimation; Dynamics (music); Work (physics); Population; Demographic economics; Economics; Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Demography; Psychology; Sociology; Physics; Computer science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.027899715903762473,"score_gpt":0.34370956283320436,"score_spread":0.3158098469294419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573748388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74216694,0.00039005055,0.0000072147377,0.0014512289,0.00088429597,0.0010342278,0.00021746728,0.0000628521,0.25378573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8628683,0.11550925,0.0003424086,0.0001292173,0.00036921122,0.00019693872,0.00008836031,0.00009422264,0.020402087],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959173,0.00072220765,0.000795105,0.0007258271,0.00064860994,0.0011909312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970286,0.0010195813,0.00027286043,0.0011699423,0.0002686144,0.00024038428],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040565967,0.0002905815,0.0005078003,0.00026146814,0.00066519104,0.00024312748,0.0017417012,0.00062634336,0.000066984656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042092855,0.00027037275,0.00023266663,0.00028458147,0.0014189087,0.000085227744,0.0007551125,0.0015468529,0.0000066360303],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029838248,0.00054693787,0.3112783,0.00033152822,0.00043237561,0.000036222234,0.021606911,0.04784014,0.00001830571,0.13115683,0.0003386944,0.48611537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020896548,0.00036614848,0.23342745,0.00059077586,0.00007861248,0.000004803234,0.11273775,0.120320156,0.000025668092,0.080527745,0.4475787,0.0022525343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033938969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05301077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48386285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021290593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020843607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573998871","doi":"","title":"Health Concepts and Beliefs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Caribbean dialogue","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volatility (finance); Identity (music); Sociology; Social psychology; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.029311410863992176,"score_gpt":0.3158161236559929,"score_spread":0.2865047127920007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573998871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9035372,0.008533674,0.0010654099,0.0058867573,0.004031527,0.0006107436,0.0001858792,0.0002607707,0.07588802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958279,0.0006798333,0.0002764645,0.0017158884,0.0008918277,0.0000064201877,0.000038355614,0.0000113625965,0.00055193406],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987761,0.00018553056,0.00013957727,0.00015198471,0.00018672901,0.0005600841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992681,0.00008561967,0.000057448397,0.0001393735,0.00004609857,0.00040336396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006833857,0.00009547703,0.00017150711,0.000036073525,0.0004857271,0.000043301377,0.00012395556,0.00009998998,0.000022110584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011602754,0.00009646109,0.000035920693,0.00015062945,0.0003173099,0.00017443926,0.00004191565,0.0001122968,0.000038803395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029375683,0.00006972893,0.5421865,0.00002481748,0.000020189807,0.0000016121002,0.16859803,0.0000022458612,0.000023920138,0.2647531,0.015478852,0.008838059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005145921,0.00006903433,0.71515244,0.000019455772,0.000015345491,0.0000029174398,0.037753705,0.000014153843,0.0000068880163,0.0032043287,0.2428727,0.0003744215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041682622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032191325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2615488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009510885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019530572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6301193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574322149","doi":"10.1787/5k4dlw9w6czq-en","title":"Fathers' Leave, Fathers' Involvement and Child Development","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"OECD social employment and migration working papers","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Science Foundation Ireland; York University","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology; Parental leave; Engineering; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.04236027702778706,"score_gpt":0.2881435796055626,"score_spread":0.24578330257777553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574322149","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3536608,0.0064083315,0.00012371516,0.004102346,0.0037476507,0.002596715,0.00002974393,0.0004178902,0.6289128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87085515,0.039444175,0.00066222734,0.0014374254,0.003068249,0.00035690336,0.0004651789,0.00015418718,0.08355649],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996885,0.00017637451,0.00052357104,0.00060991704,0.0012127912,0.0005923553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990316,0.000064408596,0.00038200204,0.00014167915,0.00015999853,0.00022029094],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009772243,0.0004426575,0.00047550217,0.00016163346,0.002391828,0.00042929428,0.0001943498,0.0006227938,0.00016811876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003889531,0.00044501142,0.0001325837,0.00015653756,0.00034488065,0.00010650822,0.00010333151,0.00038839586,0.000028123566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026701884,0.0002868929,0.17639181,0.00032898382,0.0009544878,0.000010696619,0.54135585,0.000006294192,0.00010233289,0.011526875,0.025210032,0.24379905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032097226,0.000021228108,0.02156078,0.00020044792,0.0001075192,7.6233545e-7,0.036318813,0.00000454078,0.0000044313424,0.00012726516,0.9407478,0.0005854656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004367755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027098129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9155377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006894857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009338498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574459447","doi":"","title":"Models of Earning and Caring: Evidence from Canadian Time-Use Data","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Wife; Unpaid work; General partnership; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.20478352413120302,"score_gpt":0.3316097452969583,"score_spread":0.1268262211657553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574459447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977066,0.00024956104,0.00054465333,0.0001743841,0.00014282728,0.00018357755,0.0001469042,0.000066874425,0.0007846252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99352026,0.0009551387,0.00015762253,0.0001218638,0.00007332579,1.9444155e-7,0.000055194127,0.00002134417,0.0050950376],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979308,0.00036079244,0.00019448678,0.0005851354,0.00041114417,0.00051762554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809647,0.0002685968,0.00014412268,0.00075117254,0.00019031545,0.00054930785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060236186,0.00019230718,0.0002660665,0.00034137387,0.000530889,0.0003195593,0.001312664,0.00022701628,0.000029328434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001961579,0.00023923763,0.000045092034,0.00052061805,0.00026990942,0.004596188,0.00047509285,0.00035198109,0.000034816105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019263915,0.0000145396525,0.9935643,0.0000073251213,0.00003598703,0.00010994945,0.005548417,0.0001803671,0.00013009056,0.000142523,9.4454225e-7,0.00024626678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028516352,0.000026224423,0.9929671,0.00019455528,0.000087866654,0.0000030665726,0.0035257933,0.00006895034,0.000008532642,0.00023270004,0.0023109885,0.00028900141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09431246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78969425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6953818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024326483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005863815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9755828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575040464","doi":"10.3386/w10968","title":"The Integration of Child Tax Credits and Welfare: Evidence from the National Child Benefit Program","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Welfare; Tax credit; Economics; Public economics; Ad valorem tax; Tax reform; Business; Market economy","score_opus":0.17476976876157696,"score_gpt":0.455488760465018,"score_spread":0.28071899170344106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575040464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6682285,0.0025088103,0.00005211581,0.15937911,0.0005444261,0.0017314482,0.00029245793,0.000035369754,0.16722773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752885,0.0013421237,0.00027681986,0.000078047044,0.00049227104,0.000059571983,0.00004230823,0.0000063458847,0.00017365078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998031,0.00015354162,0.00030136298,0.00022024315,0.0010723061,0.00022151574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729586,0.0013541739,0.00013586727,0.00011521839,0.0010403529,0.000058502377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034914198,0.00007680658,0.000108800494,0.000090000976,0.0011767581,0.00013110774,0.0005247595,0.00010057377,0.000042140633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001908371,0.00005295259,0.000053948126,0.00024337352,0.0008500367,0.00028584807,0.00007991586,0.00028766788,0.000008485411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025073236,0.000049763952,0.003609179,0.000003215005,0.000033144213,6.64709e-8,0.0020706248,0.0006819767,0.00002853408,0.98995453,0.00080860086,0.0027352653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045039406,0.00010685338,0.25528017,0.00010349987,0.0000071042045,0.0000012724867,0.005374072,0.0010342809,0.00008777553,0.72894347,0.008501911,0.00010922123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007635591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011584543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3293003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037026516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057527283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99897265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575757253","doi":"","title":"Is the Collective Model of Labor Supply Useful for Tax Policy Analysis? A Simulation Exercise","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Unitary state; Negotiation; Normative; Scope (computer science); Distribution (mathematics); Tax reform; Labour supply; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Public economics","score_opus":0.059673218625231735,"score_gpt":0.3733221725042137,"score_spread":0.31364895387898195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575757253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9497698,0.00017968351,0.00054745446,0.0018509044,0.00024449432,0.0037577986,0.0022306123,0.00002998514,0.04138927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784093,0.008714154,0.00115458,0.00015583368,0.00014119255,0.0004161109,0.00006109405,0.00004105816,0.010906712],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688095,0.0004914023,0.0006364556,0.00074622105,0.00045034918,0.0007946483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966093,0.0012539858,0.00033834932,0.0008628468,0.00077112333,0.00016444136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031888061,0.00025304925,0.00067444745,0.0009386683,0.0005843177,0.00016812998,0.00088125095,0.0005563267,0.000032105494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013064599,0.00024228505,0.0004452789,0.0012294775,0.0006343907,0.00010767339,0.00030581848,0.0007064234,0.0000013612338],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106141146,0.00012179927,0.03734454,0.00006973232,0.00036844204,5.421786e-7,0.0294738,0.92600507,0.000008764929,0.0036673981,0.000100799916,0.002732963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005540918,0.00004206745,0.020550065,0.00005342063,0.0001665012,7.064458e-8,0.016525662,0.9214825,0.000015561573,0.038158614,0.0020957387,0.00035572262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026782209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008240463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034491215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018518304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054208376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98800975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577064863","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01725.x","title":"A Perfect Storm? Welfare, Care, Gender and Generations in Uruguay","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Development and Change","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Ministry of Labour","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Economics; Redistribution (election); Welfare state; Poverty; Context (archaeology); Status quo; Welfare reform; Inequality; Asset (computer security); Labour economics; Development economics; Politics; Economic growth; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.09022291223805032,"score_gpt":0.26930837173542926,"score_spread":0.17908545949737895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577064863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778,0.0016222902,0.000039274855,0.000067604204,0.00018302958,0.0001900597,0.0000036200374,0.000025384805,0.02006873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970174,0.00070101814,0.0017059607,0.0001796025,0.00007761179,0.00005823625,0.000012930287,0.0000068359127,0.00024039888],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993523,0.000039804392,0.00009970155,0.00016832212,0.00012301774,0.00021688327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979633,0.000006943568,0.00002157923,0.00005296061,0.0000382968,0.000083891486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017780364,0.00008598972,0.00008751972,0.00008783803,0.0004068695,0.000031722608,0.000058719223,0.000073445146,0.000054430053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000071794657,0.00008308908,0.000010158161,0.00013339645,0.00006326354,0.00012184702,0.00003605986,0.000056058187,0.0000044847175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021648193,0.000018805455,0.35472688,0.0000121314,0.000007141052,0.0000040755294,0.62830204,3.4705412e-8,0.0000053607346,0.009486679,0.000034713026,0.007399943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019080417,0.000010070922,0.9052492,0.000004923248,0.000004896312,5.156217e-7,0.07122373,0.000008910558,0.000011347802,0.0001295977,0.023025125,0.00014088525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017176501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02084324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55707836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055744647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007292443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577188326","doi":"","title":"An Empirical Investigation of Household Dynamics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Public economics; Public good; Economics; Public policy; Set (abstract data type); Demographic economics; Business; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.07470848648456518,"score_gpt":0.36312813319286746,"score_spread":0.2884196467083023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577188326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91770333,0.00005641524,0.00002759827,0.0003319578,0.00062870997,0.0006209654,0.0001493053,0.00005445641,0.08042725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98922324,0.007353624,0.001772291,0.00016260816,0.00021946413,0.000070707436,0.00016577635,0.000066115244,0.00096616556],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956091,0.001332923,0.0007546856,0.00085986865,0.00057373656,0.00086969056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975863,0.00042130827,0.00028533262,0.001027322,0.00026411083,0.00041561827],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044063935,0.0002768071,0.0005484145,0.00052620156,0.00031739095,0.00016786602,0.0010574845,0.0009775178,0.000030838262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005802407,0.0003319872,0.00016113935,0.00035875646,0.0013120093,0.0001834421,0.0003309336,0.0016057795,0.000003001761],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003503177,0.00025802042,0.94066644,0.00017330557,0.00007038423,0.000013584452,0.014823512,0.017118668,0.00007760682,0.011124794,0.00012123829,0.015517438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015114353,0.00042477238,0.7244061,0.00039942897,0.000057946152,0.000004853107,0.07909661,0.084269,0.000079204256,0.09584907,0.011762943,0.0021386044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014013638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011208355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21626028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019437075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028344875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579189619","doi":"","title":"Québec's Childcare Universal Low Fees Policy 10 Years After: Effects, Costs and Benefits","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Demographic economics; Early childhood; Child care; Economics; Labour economics; Demography; Medicine; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Pediatrics; Sociology","score_opus":0.005285607496548043,"score_gpt":0.21684516258613556,"score_spread":0.21155955508958751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579189619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98907447,0.0016699084,0.000010379952,0.00058947183,0.00040168565,0.0003390209,0.0004922616,0.00007032896,0.0073524597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904691,0.005115928,0.0001828705,0.00006299614,0.00021239065,7.1191516e-7,0.00011540031,0.000016223164,0.0038243677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982496,0.0001470284,0.00019976123,0.00062834437,0.00038552794,0.00038972258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982853,0.00023959638,0.00022625874,0.00071346527,0.00014989138,0.00038548562],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022034529,0.00022984375,0.00033626411,0.00017027512,0.0007975053,0.00010575003,0.00065904506,0.00022837406,0.00004655034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015000369,0.0002696827,0.000061273786,0.00019621708,0.00090042053,0.0007454287,0.0005358545,0.0002322864,0.000007703068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007951325,0.00067986007,0.829068,0.00032789545,0.00092328707,0.0015293967,0.013483455,0.000019347313,0.001216514,0.014887466,0.02395046,0.113119155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022534113,0.00014132904,0.7779011,0.00013223887,0.0003133943,0.000033125256,0.007086856,0.00006404878,0.000035107707,0.000106964515,0.21137087,0.0005615746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3710845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50960726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1874204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027062112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046833436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579946975","doi":"","title":"Using Cigarette Taxes When Smokers Are Heterogeneous: Evidence on Hyperbolic Preferences, Endogenous Preferences, Smoking, and Price Elasticity of Smoking in France","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Quit smoking; Price elasticity of demand; Economics; Social capital; Elasticity (physics); Population; Microeconomics; Smoking cessation; Environmental health; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.13574575941015163,"score_gpt":0.3476412234882992,"score_spread":0.21189546407814755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579946975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98631805,0.0023445368,0.00003989444,0.00005297615,0.0005336433,0.0011904954,0.00014753966,0.0000405323,0.009332309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96424556,0.034712322,0.0004888428,0.00009314236,0.00020618577,0.00008019867,0.000011901837,0.000057608988,0.00010424353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99376976,0.0010202632,0.0011394055,0.0015029694,0.0010496727,0.0015179496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959135,0.0017912283,0.00075390324,0.0008824318,0.0003246755,0.00033427685],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048589758,0.00052695663,0.0010083166,0.0009479079,0.00045535882,0.0002529642,0.0014127517,0.0010427648,0.000035469893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001839733,0.0005933163,0.00015364737,0.0004229776,0.0012723894,0.00025386104,0.00092643267,0.0024770072,6.1069363e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009865417,0.0002174769,0.92997324,0.0005134302,0.00015068467,0.000061860155,0.015955955,0.029676974,0.00014538791,0.00038978955,0.0000028902025,0.022813626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018581096,0.0005647084,0.9219304,0.011192038,0.00013305852,0.00002715055,0.027910935,0.014201899,0.0007174204,0.01683754,0.0018453072,0.0027814442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011326082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01661452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032367785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017303837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015763124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581394100","doi":"10.1086/339729","title":"Competing Premarital Investments","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Investment (military); Incentive; Economics; Public good; Marriage market; Quality (philosophy); Market competition; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.03956966720152694,"score_gpt":0.3028673719136666,"score_spread":0.26329770471213965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581394100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26541245,0.00032671524,0.0004180934,0.003919969,0.002143713,0.00019705904,0.000033180364,0.00002370994,0.7275251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916737,0.00007259636,0.0028643988,0.0018982089,0.0025456075,0.0000030374276,0.0000042081288,0.000020499174,0.0009177405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977669,0.00024219255,0.0008128074,0.00020366408,0.00030643342,0.0006679669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800724,0.00024007968,0.0005415801,0.00018276561,0.00031631827,0.00071200845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082667696,0.00019959443,0.0005168809,0.00015948426,0.0001914908,0.00024341792,0.00058007526,0.00036788327,0.0003083168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034705902,0.00020044851,0.00033298382,0.000058128317,0.00036743237,0.00020134571,0.00024246397,0.0009753741,0.000042771357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038893845,0.00015864972,0.026649743,0.00008398699,0.0001424832,0.000044456898,0.0040699616,0.000054451684,7.216221e-7,0.967582,0.0009970185,0.0002126215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010272899,0.00014717926,0.03134893,0.0003657941,0.00022324572,0.000059346636,0.02777846,0.00139799,0.0000058077558,0.8263873,0.11045989,0.0007987525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037408364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048378868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7266074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066295353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008283516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8174053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581892736","doi":"","title":"Women, Tax and Social Programs: The Gendered Impact of Funding Social Programs Through the Tax System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tax credit; Indirect tax; Tax reform; Public economics; Value-added tax; Ad valorem tax; Subsidy; Direct tax; State income tax; Tax avoidance; Economics; Business; Labour economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.036472136413103255,"score_gpt":0.293967472139712,"score_spread":0.25749533572660877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581892736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687414,0.0003852797,0.000043072316,0.00090592523,0.0002928751,0.0011734407,0.00007106585,0.00017938264,0.028207533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960986,0.00008822756,0.00012894002,0.00022574229,0.0010953812,0.00018867134,0.000018855748,0.00003685436,0.0021187728],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665123,0.00064726983,0.00045027985,0.00040063242,0.0007753248,0.0010752572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990211,0.000096161486,0.0002645067,0.00029630426,0.00015599093,0.00016591068],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013881046,0.00029798274,0.00041829038,0.000024523675,0.0032850183,0.00055198715,0.0006982529,0.00028010507,0.00017148069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031369647,0.00018866551,0.00028866858,0.0006182119,0.0013889914,0.000369396,0.00008536879,0.0004310375,0.00003683431],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001891585,0.00047229647,0.05341254,0.00025816544,0.0007530648,0.000015044226,0.5099553,0.000037639074,0.00012712042,0.38542345,0.003117894,0.046238314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022821627,0.00057139364,0.07047571,0.00011375732,0.00024228315,0.000018048646,0.73586655,0.0002590221,0.000007834176,0.0140476795,0.1749842,0.001131335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01686177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006307515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37137577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054692174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037475265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99801254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584001513","doi":"","title":"Women, Social Policy and Poverty","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Political science; Development economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.0061116254935455324,"score_gpt":0.18667995166008358,"score_spread":0.18056832616653806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584001513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9185746,0.0011247001,0.000116728275,0.015859632,0.000091897295,0.00009325532,0.000030234318,0.0001011763,0.06400778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9318596,0.0013714297,0.00016044507,0.00090376317,0.00070937804,0.0000023456128,0.000009835419,0.00001430919,0.06496891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897015,0.00006888877,0.0000754724,0.0001868027,0.00022628388,0.00047240205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996363,0.000029742574,0.00005571073,0.000089641166,0.00005181224,0.0001367891],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017195819,0.00010352888,0.00013168668,0.00010718285,0.0013696157,0.000030065468,0.0001594245,0.00013763452,0.00004411663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021658472,0.00011951268,0.000050292583,0.00034717988,0.0001613506,0.00013773832,0.000091500006,0.00008444152,0.000021679576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045563316,0.0000860429,0.022438202,0.0000122326155,0.000044457258,0.00019824263,0.026620068,0.000024631307,0.0003589024,0.8261187,0.1118376,0.012215327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004799608,0.00001984848,0.08214427,0.0000018556697,0.000014980708,0.0000069465727,0.016264053,0.000064557746,0.000002117718,0.014088572,0.8867354,0.00017744779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085622475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17650929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81203014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054709907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012635831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584408917","doi":"","title":"Fécondité et incitatifs fiscaux : quelles conclusions pouvons-nous en tirer?","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"CIRANO Project Reports","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.023288101353100558,"score_gpt":0.3170254510613007,"score_spread":0.29373734970820015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584408917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8117119,0.007859394,0.001476906,0.010499271,0.0085874945,0.001788035,0.00013336641,0.0003907389,0.15755291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96555585,0.0027188975,0.0034778973,0.0018217046,0.0007319774,0.00009351137,0.00011423881,0.000093689174,0.025392244],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509954,0.0006840285,0.0011068542,0.0010131184,0.0009659379,0.0011304965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749416,0.00034713498,0.0006405302,0.00080428633,0.00035971505,0.0003541975],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020144894,0.00054063293,0.00067322765,0.00024930428,0.0011994529,0.00021596174,0.00042504378,0.0006988639,0.0002196331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077406573,0.000563741,0.00037054037,0.0012613344,0.0009910201,0.00051972683,0.00028772475,0.00066031615,0.00013873905],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003597239,0.0018269336,0.080674484,0.00045056187,0.0005124395,0.009750788,0.5935624,0.0014169104,0.0016440492,0.2759379,0.015882354,0.018305145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022781314,0.00080967875,0.047782607,0.0009984629,0.00069633796,0.0025567836,0.16818206,0.00024274991,0.00025270134,0.12920198,0.6439797,0.0030187608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022292363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009953123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6280974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008318656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005406195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585529017","doi":"","title":"Welfare Hot Buttons: Women, Work and Social Policy Reform","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare reform; Work (physics); Social work; Social Welfare; Social policy; Welfare; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Law; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.02088054833785339,"score_gpt":0.2741586950061899,"score_spread":0.2532781466683365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585529017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96393335,0.0005478856,0.0000010529268,0.018881865,0.00039715949,0.00018722417,0.000073285104,0.00006721754,0.015910942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99330497,0.00046470962,0.00003210236,0.0034836885,0.00065287825,0.000103266415,0.0000044154126,0.000020402544,0.0019335563],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793124,0.000049599465,0.00018201646,0.00029475248,0.0002477835,0.0012945994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990303,0.000018641233,0.000058412337,0.00013689334,0.00015402072,0.00060173933],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036571053,0.0001989266,0.00029684263,0.00025973914,0.002734699,0.00010157736,0.00021898873,0.000118192365,0.000037999336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014257699,0.00019671377,0.000040645737,0.0007059944,0.0007420511,0.00014120479,0.000061060826,0.00015189576,0.000018698818],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010718283,0.000018875946,0.009508536,0.000031730153,0.00015368342,0.000038493865,0.59652215,0.0000034078253,0.0000010269182,0.3917052,0.0003520474,0.0016541255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035961374,0.000033050106,0.038201604,0.000009988592,0.000007969827,7.572279e-7,0.86066633,9.541294e-8,1.8908212e-7,0.023979813,0.076467104,0.00027345197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0438519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30169144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36772537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008507991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013671779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586036008","doi":"","title":"Those Who Work, Those Who Don't: Poverty, Morality and Family in Rural America (review)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Poverty; Work (physics); Sociology; Rural poverty; Development economics; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.03334437934923673,"score_gpt":0.27792980292355307,"score_spread":0.24458542357431634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586036008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9047071,0.047621395,0.00009981484,0.0011329413,0.00036972918,0.00057560677,0.00006834037,0.00012932478,0.045295794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78037995,0.19724727,0.0010322022,0.0092347525,0.00017884154,0.00005256233,0.0000150956885,0.00004763324,0.011811715],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744225,0.00052094745,0.00042881462,0.0004367632,0.00044337366,0.00072785426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989498,0.00007420384,0.00015738669,0.0004120794,0.000121192556,0.000285325],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087714783,0.00028508384,0.0005492222,0.00008027885,0.00028427836,0.000073455856,0.00049658766,0.00019319443,0.00016962602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010401068,0.00026781947,0.00010858017,0.00088824437,0.00051066274,0.00034904387,0.000103733146,0.0003501389,0.00005435981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014102754,0.0007691792,0.6036612,0.0004612723,0.00010002728,0.00008507435,0.12893829,0.0000050641956,0.00018656472,0.044433117,0.039516613,0.18170263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005517593,0.000054704076,0.905164,0.000473321,0.000026756374,9.612736e-7,0.020003509,0.000025125046,0.000004360299,0.001707613,0.0715501,0.0004377919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041201185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007046266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30150285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007946234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024361718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586492695","doi":"","title":"Reforming the Financial Incentives of the Welfare System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"Incentive; Welfare; Work (physics); Poverty; Government (linguistics); Business; Welfare reform; Public economics; Economics; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.009757572443266043,"score_gpt":0.22851748101737507,"score_spread":0.218759908574109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586492695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84515315,0.0005178564,0.000012557196,0.0007224521,0.0018794498,0.00033716837,0.000046716163,0.000067190515,0.15126348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99596566,0.00012432551,0.000051183884,0.00018132903,0.00038909944,0.000020083255,0.0000020441348,0.000014785848,0.0032514655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981547,0.00032279472,0.00042279446,0.00028109635,0.00036169658,0.0004569038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989594,0.00012335945,0.00023285109,0.00048026847,0.00010804022,0.00009603075],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080736,0.00018187976,0.00027764903,0.00005104312,0.0016822366,0.000052343912,0.00080140814,0.00017871612,0.0006271453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012563643,0.00011859653,0.00022285045,0.00037091845,0.0011679544,0.00022239937,0.00007142169,0.00026020774,0.00008086295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014908209,0.00004987892,0.88096917,0.000038046168,0.00003667103,0.0000035491792,0.02157748,0.00003371224,0.000023035365,0.09253574,0.0006477814,0.0040700394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046664686,0.000031585867,0.79886484,0.000119474375,0.00005823216,0.000014119692,0.06906478,0.00016147416,0.00004161339,0.0003649491,0.13046113,0.00035114484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001343545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043412126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15081255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034138747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005370017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587322992","doi":"","title":"The Academy, the Prison and the Psychiatric Hospital: How Each Affects Mothering Occupations (Panel)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CommonKnowledge Research Repository (Pacific University Oregon)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Psychiatry; Psychology; Psychiatric hospital; Criminology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04366686001559526,"score_gpt":0.30441637709976027,"score_spread":0.260749517084165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587322992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7347419,0.0078097726,0.0005824767,0.054680694,0.001101709,0.0021903052,0.000011869442,0.00023562805,0.19864564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96385336,0.003109887,0.000087127446,0.00002045706,0.00066140736,0.000010388987,0.0000019851668,0.000021253121,0.032234114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99479717,0.0029519554,0.00015722933,0.0004242877,0.0008628045,0.0008065686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962266,0.0023541243,0.0001300588,0.00067680405,0.00036224685,0.00025018165],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036875617,0.0002008204,0.00020808325,0.00016648462,0.012368708,0.0006499095,0.0017226315,0.00022498862,0.0000042459806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033770138,0.00012291585,0.0001509071,0.0012801222,0.0038923405,0.00039089995,0.0004413325,0.0012131186,0.000028628561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043479036,0.00052606687,0.16333139,0.00008500527,0.00038530017,0.00002948988,0.20729367,0.0000745811,0.0001422789,0.48479035,0.111835755,0.031071294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010655324,0.00009101248,0.06673751,0.000027122944,0.00006357593,0.000006608099,0.17529112,0.0030790411,0.000020853917,0.0007065358,0.7526253,0.0002857726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005142254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002084843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64078957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004367363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036286208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587733437","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.569184","title":"Poverty Persistence in Sweden","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"Poverty; Immigration; Welfare; Demographic economics; Panel data; Economics; Refugee; Percentage point; Hazard ratio; Educational attainment; Demography; Geography; Econometrics; Economic growth; Sociology; Statistics; Confidence interval","score_opus":0.018404391414076297,"score_gpt":0.2698144340005123,"score_spread":0.251410042586436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587733437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96595544,0.001992106,0.0025146445,0.0035621012,0.00040561522,0.000107002445,0.00000127414,0.000032904092,0.025428932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99010414,0.007147428,0.00009803007,0.0003831831,0.00024644547,0.0000015655706,7.909883e-7,0.000009425252,0.0020089864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997171,0.000094353214,0.00017859235,0.00015251842,0.00036333746,0.0020402074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996424,0.00002165758,0.000070364105,0.00009332964,0.00006706649,0.00010518164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016681483,0.00009407139,0.000119642675,0.00009461367,0.00041728705,0.00006993855,0.00036135124,0.000096200805,0.000022726726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009376166,0.0000879881,0.00008670343,0.00035046923,0.00009061145,0.00024375916,0.000019124316,0.0011264489,0.00003010809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019777883,0.00012010138,0.067836516,0.0000026767964,0.000043062413,0.000017414308,0.018655442,0.0005434085,0.00010994039,0.90913063,0.00005630114,0.003464752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011657561,0.00017105,0.037655685,0.000025841564,0.000018058543,0.000086946544,0.16648804,0.00002842232,0.0000051555903,0.7897999,0.00427248,0.00028261892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023060224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07562024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14783259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026721216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051327287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9412473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588397033","doi":"10.1007/s10834-009-9161-z","title":"N. Gilbert: A Mother’s Work: How Feminism, the Market, and Policy Shape Family Life","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Work (physics); Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03003471867970039,"score_gpt":0.29035107004707683,"score_spread":0.26031635136737646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588397033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92245656,0.009025184,0.00002744581,0.021457506,0.00042832212,0.00011691005,0.0000069672465,0.000014574398,0.046466522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96478343,0.024235731,0.00034346135,0.0045613144,0.0015054396,9.975396e-7,3.7001433e-7,0.000012570893,0.004556707],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877834,0.00014900701,0.0003607116,0.0001788112,0.00016111894,0.0003720025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903554,0.0001894014,0.00031202566,0.00014454205,0.00005723525,0.00026124794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011655304,0.00017828034,0.00036159455,0.00013635667,0.00045710395,0.00036461782,0.00032362845,0.0001461061,0.00002947248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010959067,0.00013193357,0.00010591748,0.000119218086,0.00029798082,0.0003767086,0.000036127636,0.0002398971,0.000006191292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082077377,0.0003792886,0.19311832,0.000077384,0.00081471546,0.000090735244,0.24168336,0.00020568565,0.0008769687,0.09350553,0.26012334,0.20830388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074785814,0.00022156167,0.655269,0.000057659217,0.000057675945,0.000018272005,0.07234646,0.0003958381,0.0000027420838,0.0074805715,0.26310846,0.00029384176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048758314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000090522175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46215072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000889479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030839056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53800946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588951482","doi":"","title":"Working Hours in Canada and the United States","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Working hours; Economics; Unemployment; Supply side; Incentive; Labour economics; Demand side; Demographic economics; Wage; Wage inequality; Divergence (linguistics); Economic growth; Market economy; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.036313119231036084,"score_gpt":0.30297708477425567,"score_spread":0.2666639655432196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588951482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9408043,0.0002953737,9.617471e-7,0.00089101866,0.0006336355,0.00058747106,0.000020077761,0.000010540072,0.056756638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93270653,0.065632604,0.000087054636,0.00036271408,0.00008638382,0.00007783236,0.000038849594,0.000027842283,0.0009801897],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662876,0.0012072882,0.0004167802,0.0005218119,0.0003443013,0.00088108255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978188,0.0013421326,0.00012227963,0.0004528917,0.00008663496,0.00017723102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042866226,0.00019507465,0.00037695453,0.000329527,0.0003479007,0.00021614507,0.00065580365,0.00025071006,0.000019864485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060011644,0.00017832646,0.000049835522,0.0003766578,0.000831929,0.000040993586,0.00041495997,0.0015912869,6.4046907e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007510697,0.000037094087,0.9013119,0.000041489908,0.00006560301,0.00004532571,0.02190073,0.044596888,4.4503855e-7,0.0067505343,0.00014620984,0.025028693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003883044,0.00003565726,0.35270876,0.0005960712,0.000025230236,0.0000043121163,0.43615818,0.041009326,0.0000018406668,0.040544394,0.12350549,0.0015277037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9561782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5486031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003024956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054555777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9677961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589162855","doi":"","title":"A 'Natural Experiment' on the Economics of Storks: Evidence on the Impact of Differential Family Policy on Fertility Rates in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; Total fertility rate; Subsidy; Population; Birth rate; Demographic economics; Earned income tax credit; Government (linguistics); Public economics; Demography; Tax credit; Family planning; Sociology","score_opus":0.06960414284664632,"score_gpt":0.3748091740311469,"score_spread":0.3052050311845006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589162855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97575724,0.0001564359,2.2958386e-7,0.0010862295,0.0004392279,0.001103347,0.00014802466,0.0000072621165,0.021301985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900706,0.009196898,0.000005401759,0.00016164828,0.0001718342,0.000110431094,0.000010968782,0.000031496616,0.00024074316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955721,0.0014335497,0.00081854925,0.0007295284,0.0005128081,0.0009334786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942299,0.0037768073,0.00040831786,0.0012681268,0.00014996139,0.00016688096],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002678012,0.00038129758,0.00067982794,0.0003658482,0.0002826503,0.00011773077,0.0018847923,0.00030539837,0.000070515416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001760693,0.0002644248,0.00029542582,0.0002941445,0.000795877,0.00006583504,0.0005134613,0.0018194823,0.0000016611631],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005230833,0.0020449802,0.5890172,0.0002772611,0.000992833,0.000034389348,0.045641877,0.2651201,0.0016187755,0.04187086,0.00074932794,0.047401574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005440932,0.00037830815,0.9393228,0.00063684315,0.000007395742,3.0743044e-7,0.040179454,0.014416303,0.00029368917,0.0035475292,0.00015431784,0.00051893335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8560256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78558743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35030565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0095222825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012336274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589684068","doi":"","title":"Amour et argent : mobilite intergenerationnelle et appariement conjugal d'apres le revenu des parents","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.24526582516490542,"score_gpt":0.4297532602663694,"score_spread":0.18448743510146398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589684068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85659593,0.0033506178,0.005519865,0.009595334,0.0021665702,0.004217886,0.0007407033,0.00005991376,0.11775319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9560543,0.02070897,0.0011340461,0.00021594926,0.00025083503,0.00002846689,0.00039982158,0.00005212724,0.021155529],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872054,0.006926043,0.00084382365,0.0014339021,0.0022527403,0.001338089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936495,0.0009735207,0.00063368137,0.0014104982,0.0026982985,0.00063449115],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010377089,0.000600493,0.0009622619,0.00047715084,0.003786503,0.0016045127,0.010047771,0.00051766995,0.0016892751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000612795,0.00059627875,0.0003937571,0.0019179774,0.0043392004,0.0032759767,0.014478143,0.0021585503,0.00016468434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081670523,0.0042247493,0.37780866,0.00080092804,0.0013350482,0.00007619909,0.22988468,0.009917573,0.00039648282,0.33604455,0.026726333,0.011968094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021371362,0.000215484,0.21660928,0.00091336877,0.00014262258,0.0000019624056,0.10000963,0.0022822004,0.00021877226,0.01576939,0.6606221,0.0010780495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13476484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11955105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63389575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011741436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004869404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590730874","doi":"10.1111/ecoj.12385","title":"Changing the Rules Midway: The Impact of Granting Alimony Rights on Existing and Newly Formed Partnerships","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Alimony; Beneficiary; Affect (linguistics); Economics; Matching (statistics); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06667810089108864,"score_gpt":0.3117957988122618,"score_spread":0.2451176979211732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590730874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98770434,0.00012668215,0.00017914597,0.002670036,0.00034815312,0.000111468165,0.000007868201,0.000009816226,0.0088425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830073,0.00021407857,0.000032554803,0.00008013515,0.0010408843,0.0000018071663,2.062524e-7,0.000008114783,0.000321503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988693,0.0002781311,0.00024499526,0.00009634536,0.00010700764,0.0004041982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985933,0.0008368983,0.00031566873,0.00015533449,0.0000285077,0.000070303795],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031320138,0.000103623526,0.00013785622,0.000048720005,0.0020072844,0.0001460538,0.0004068689,0.000042342923,0.000032887518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000095855205,0.000036959675,0.00012542868,0.000053046777,0.00038231237,0.00016834708,0.000042765045,0.00017925329,0.000013313175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021772436,0.000057761485,0.101430774,0.000013053477,0.00074495847,0.000009297449,0.34916124,0.0012845211,0.00081776525,0.48847303,0.0017766345,0.05601322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021972575,0.00026513776,0.1609544,0.00037071086,0.00015667382,0.00015193812,0.17468452,0.004702334,0.00017213615,0.6508043,0.0049309377,0.0006096668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061508495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008507075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17447673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016889985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015446723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591719308","doi":"10.7202/1121111ar","title":"Breaking the Bowls: Degendering and Feminist Change. Judith Lorber","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.11510274682485165,"score_gpt":0.40420551885675754,"score_spread":0.2891027720319059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591719308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40697092,0.05530774,0.005252321,0.013830565,0.016819501,0.0021778925,0.000094592164,0.0006216961,0.4989248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885113,0.0038109028,0.0005390186,0.00338546,0.0034558044,0.000034515084,0.0000040943373,0.00002586946,0.0002329845],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971535,0.00025241077,0.00039644336,0.00048465672,0.0006431519,0.0010697996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998427,0.00091704744,0.00007387054,0.00014349954,0.00027539182,0.00016321416],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016561627,0.0002889411,0.0003828917,0.000048231028,0.0030807045,0.00016079115,0.0003372189,0.00029811167,0.000012363225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012545801,0.00022146465,0.00009449698,0.0005694502,0.001898738,0.00020763562,0.00027098184,0.0005417461,0.000010579],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023502034,0.000098221724,0.032197494,0.00028758697,0.00013769533,0.00016946014,0.56386167,0.0000010013538,0.00004054798,0.39508668,0.004835544,0.0032605913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036281653,0.00002900799,0.10101028,0.00006271069,0.00039135234,0.000023128847,0.8101327,0.000016161388,0.000004259637,0.004793885,0.082711436,0.00046228804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007922286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005674831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58154047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022605348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052478244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99821717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592452761","doi":"10.3386/w8444","title":"The Limits to Wage Growth: Measuring the Growth Rate of Wages For Recent Welfare Leavers","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Wage growth; Earnings; Economics; Wage; Labour economics; Subsidy; Incentive; Hourly wage; Welfare reform; Work (physics); Demographic economics","score_opus":0.2729835551393966,"score_gpt":0.4513284788379801,"score_spread":0.1783449236985835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592452761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54715675,0.00054718537,0.00011527127,0.13245948,0.00078755314,0.0019404214,0.0000931716,0.00002689862,0.3168733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99572235,0.0022096827,0.00010475059,0.00009231758,0.00023536934,0.0000677859,0.000009499368,0.000010847486,0.0015473933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981845,0.00038582814,0.00031247246,0.00021049507,0.00049137056,0.00041531702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553114,0.0026002883,0.00009944162,0.00015405932,0.0015216095,0.000093443705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008676471,0.000077029195,0.00013988386,0.00014980313,0.0010751919,0.000060716284,0.0007102223,0.000075840144,0.00004061292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003673387,0.00005474615,0.000084493186,0.0003271485,0.00038891402,0.00012489087,0.00006882987,0.00016289631,0.000017269776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007756992,0.000025983647,0.0059534935,0.000010370722,0.000042488628,1.8863035e-7,0.002011139,0.0003252975,0.00012426084,0.9864984,0.003430256,0.0015005564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094656256,0.00020230922,0.07846535,0.00003657035,0.000015135801,9.704805e-7,0.02770268,0.00087967067,0.00097596593,0.78297293,0.107536756,0.00026511762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020367613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003751844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44856563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004112954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048681037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8269615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592653239","doi":"10.7202/013468ar","title":"Quand un et un ne font plus deux","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Welfare economics; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04743317717325571,"score_gpt":0.26807325486161143,"score_spread":0.22064007768835572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592653239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90394926,0.0056604547,0.0031333875,0.010635158,0.0026747878,0.00044794413,0.00016524766,0.00014120684,0.07319252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9557261,0.0026770593,0.0026468816,0.004616999,0.0011731588,0.00003881691,0.000075450625,0.000061555205,0.032983977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996873,0.0006762967,0.00069468364,0.00064098777,0.0001658642,0.000949157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982641,0.0005266574,0.00028811255,0.00048352077,0.000134292,0.00030333776],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011215183,0.00043409425,0.00055937725,0.000087364475,0.0004836286,0.00025939787,0.0005348422,0.00063479395,0.00071037695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106759835,0.0004775734,0.00026901628,0.00036883052,0.0005535673,0.00049777474,0.0001243821,0.00042663421,0.00039202193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025565456,0.00023073988,0.014306246,0.00004441553,0.0000886266,0.000024187771,0.01745619,0.0007407019,0.000067488436,0.9583001,0.0023402353,0.006375513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019141192,0.00016463017,0.08227287,0.00007504095,0.00014380585,0.00001696873,0.011628332,0.0024555968,0.00022813104,0.32496086,0.5749725,0.0011671198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049613606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034941733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6333392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072764436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593576974","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2370441","title":"Female Labour Force Participation in MENA's Manufacturing Sector: The Implications of Firm-Related and National Factors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Manufacturing sector; Labour economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.017287226753030224,"score_gpt":0.2854895161838115,"score_spread":0.2682022894307813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593576974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965154,0.00034869605,0.00032634486,0.0010904667,0.00006871529,0.0001787196,0.00000403052,0.000010612258,0.0014570273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981349,0.0009460229,0.000016036673,0.00004144381,0.000051796545,0.000011965375,0.0000034451682,0.0000068487952,0.00078753877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985425,0.00012855369,0.00023637355,0.00010087994,0.00024305399,0.0007486373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949104,0.00012513624,0.00014442833,0.000065435466,0.000121690755,0.00005225729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010490024,0.00007337592,0.000090779526,0.00007587701,0.0003926366,0.000052315263,0.00016489113,0.00006831433,0.000053078416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087933935,0.000054867513,0.000036380585,0.000176968,0.000091021284,0.00024076838,0.000017003182,0.00048520186,0.0000036942204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004083816,0.000066974375,0.47577462,0.000005425626,0.00007659748,9.1673925e-8,0.022789177,0.000621429,0.0006321151,0.49802354,0.00002730237,0.0019786467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018721513,0.00002771768,0.71613264,0.0000045112342,0.000008054739,0.000002725847,0.022952028,0.00015129303,0.000046697845,0.26029852,0.00012432708,0.00006427209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018563544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011795061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24035801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045050558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007767097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65819204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594779506","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.805326","title":"No-Fault Divorce and the Division of Marital Assets","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Psychology; Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Mathematics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.006406284685509363,"score_gpt":0.25648011938623,"score_spread":0.25007383470072064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594779506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9723339,0.004570568,0.0022518986,0.0026181964,0.00027313855,0.0001358733,0.000002738826,0.000016821366,0.017796837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837888,0.011832078,0.000103255596,0.000103703256,0.00038827452,0.0000011620482,9.007374e-7,0.000007979777,0.0037738504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800515,0.00021047638,0.00020751583,0.00011050398,0.000394668,0.0010716978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994417,0.0001265911,0.0001320532,0.000098164805,0.00013017525,0.000071313414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002955583,0.00008682991,0.0001439422,0.000040738432,0.00056298525,0.000068531575,0.00027914194,0.00007700888,0.000020454441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017621739,0.000058512178,0.000079854886,0.00013451719,0.00031513599,0.00019673894,0.000045001954,0.00078689214,0.00001178089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069033515,0.00007759656,0.044075638,0.0000048020793,0.00010280701,9.596038e-7,0.007010686,0.000063472755,0.00011540833,0.90818036,0.00020400886,0.04009523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007212153,0.00062728283,0.117862865,0.00007259536,0.00019083945,0.00013925621,0.06749305,0.0035196103,0.000019251165,0.74563545,0.056519363,0.000708284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006052059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008285016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1625449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024901022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089725095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4623233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595191535","doi":"","title":"Contesting Conservatisms, Family Feuds and the Privatization of Dependency","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Vision; Politics; Power (physics); Political science; Libertarianism; Political economy; Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.021096696250227004,"score_gpt":0.2491846497538522,"score_spread":0.2280879535036252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595191535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8797947,0.0008347048,0.0039017969,0.0020637175,0.0000558163,0.00018541439,0.0000058588103,0.000025717864,0.11313223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926712,0.0010288005,0.004588409,0.00007209815,0.00002475514,9.595752e-8,0.0000018785123,0.0000033258882,0.0016094622],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993582,0.000127315,0.00007787228,0.00010572233,0.00020531857,0.00012557942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934924,0.00017534573,0.00015724372,0.00011484908,0.0001573525,0.00004597816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040712245,0.000058579557,0.00014808224,0.000013405253,0.0003344679,0.000009590648,0.000204654,0.00006471498,0.00028313813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109953966,0.000059395443,0.000035818888,0.000069367205,0.000536669,0.0003267426,0.000057162757,0.000047025922,0.0000012419086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001195118,0.00007801633,0.2030888,0.000049882914,0.00008064974,0.0000022853073,0.40349534,0.00010426418,0.0012043936,0.34110406,0.0004270955,0.05024567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010878085,0.000026421132,0.7998706,0.000022682278,0.00003878356,3.588761e-7,0.19481438,0.00244116,0.000004433932,0.00032700627,0.0012781463,0.00008823375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26421273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22747931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5967818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008318581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001143335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78661716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595545280","doi":"10.1080/03906701.1987.9971334","title":"The household division of labour in young dual‐earner couples the case of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Dual (grammatical number); Division (mathematics); Sociology; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Market economy; Mathematics; Art","score_opus":0.01923676428177433,"score_gpt":0.3132988920302331,"score_spread":0.29406212774845875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595545280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98572826,0.005330993,0.000008513256,0.0038362306,0.00083786796,0.0001349514,0.00008210543,0.0000022898698,0.0040387833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978681,0.020621441,0.000028920482,0.00031449654,0.000060147562,0.0000064891437,0.0000036806762,0.0000035543037,0.00028024704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990332,0.0001864339,0.00035121426,0.00008191572,0.00022446264,0.00012276635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998558,0.0007280058,0.0002778469,0.00013360528,0.00028138986,0.000021147667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015962897,0.000052867425,0.00017120299,0.000018101056,0.00011099693,0.0000035334942,0.0003509093,0.00006181712,0.00005317083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011929711,0.00003113936,0.000056180026,0.000082377475,0.0006556456,0.000028147591,0.000055165532,0.00017787605,3.8614323e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051371967,0.000044608587,0.17181985,0.00021372092,0.000055390472,0.000019947704,0.0050343624,0.000024460966,0.00043190157,0.81795776,0.0018267786,0.0025661082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046834853,0.000054644064,0.8500194,0.00072491204,0.000037438218,0.000051033156,0.029291186,0.00025488605,0.000049932372,0.03413295,0.08470099,0.00021431221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.320697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7682061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7838248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044536053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004926097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6838265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596978337","doi":"10.1080/00220388.2014.989992","title":"Gender Parity and Schooling Choices","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Development Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Growth Centre","keywords":"Educational attainment; Parity (physics); Demographic economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demography; Psychology; Economics; Geography; Sociology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.11218210440751156,"score_gpt":0.34717960788575725,"score_spread":0.2349975034782457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596978337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97968763,0.014684184,0.00024330456,0.0010151912,0.00058907113,0.00005811183,2.7173334e-7,0.0000094733805,0.0037127333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881291,0.008366828,0.0027131764,0.00022292483,0.00022438895,7.5285055e-7,8.504624e-8,0.000004008429,0.0003387827],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894685,0.00015062286,0.0002499709,0.00005228627,0.00042197376,0.0001783206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909484,0.00014695634,0.00018587934,0.00004776775,0.00041909676,0.000105452535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028421143,0.00007556591,0.00016745951,0.00004563724,0.0006021333,0.000035719615,0.00017711945,0.000029077813,0.0000021760027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004146081,0.000045271227,0.000019125579,0.000118231495,0.00019433562,0.00016493263,0.00008588271,0.0001357492,0.000003943866],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032668428,0.000038605143,0.46498084,0.000020851514,0.00048474697,0.000006027043,0.52575845,0.00006086161,0.00001575496,0.0018040012,0.004480573,0.0023166046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005557654,0.00003800368,0.43921697,0.000047471553,0.00008493732,0.00001348487,0.48514694,0.000007928304,0.000021807784,0.008596169,0.06609919,0.00017134317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052131916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029090443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06161861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103500955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004475801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4631183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598142118","doi":"","title":"Age, Retirement and Expenditure Patterns: An Econometric Study of Older Canadian Households","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Almost ideal demand system; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Demographic economics; Goods and services; Population; Retirement age; Population ageing; Labour economics; Demography; Production (economics); Pension; Microeconomics; Finance; Economy","score_opus":0.07141793077154013,"score_gpt":0.3386177953951827,"score_spread":0.2671998646236426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598142118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95356834,0.00020156923,5.536286e-7,0.00010276248,0.00051168574,0.0015192938,0.00018872341,0.000024617404,0.04388243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98219395,0.01581939,0.000070189475,0.00006357367,0.00024269431,0.00015468468,0.00004776156,0.00005657144,0.0013511732],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606454,0.0006993821,0.00068524975,0.0010648542,0.0004388592,0.001047136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772614,0.00020787219,0.00021967287,0.0010157685,0.00012480444,0.0007057217],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024581235,0.00031841162,0.0006224898,0.0012920456,0.00043350435,0.0002945862,0.0010140967,0.0006152211,0.00022994626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017901593,0.00037384153,0.00008907173,0.00030276636,0.00037588322,0.00016998514,0.00050202024,0.0011959167,0.00000255916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012785888,0.00074860395,0.8801317,0.00015333723,0.00013596287,0.00010891584,0.07027789,0.0021117222,0.0000013966481,0.00033343522,0.00008041884,0.04590383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009614132,0.00033835683,0.8155486,0.00010589143,0.000020699152,0.0000011506123,0.1748016,0.0012897747,0.0000011103125,0.00046716584,0.0058106817,0.0006535864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25769067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8227524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56506175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017786012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009137274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598196439","doi":"","title":"Life After Welfare: The Economic Well-being of Welfare Leavers in Canada During the 1990s","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Earnings; Economics; Demographic economics; Longitudinal data; Labour economics; Welfare system; Term (time); Demography; Market economy; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.012585686307180504,"score_gpt":0.26313539759148596,"score_spread":0.2505497112843055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598196439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8698785,0.00019033544,1.9345084e-7,0.0051466255,0.0010657513,0.0008591833,0.00006288809,0.00001139719,0.12278513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885853,0.009592953,0.000024421048,0.00025094548,0.00019778025,0.00020027792,0.000010870013,0.00005351924,0.0010839372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955687,0.0010328678,0.00089324487,0.00080258324,0.0004663514,0.001236255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766076,0.00050928385,0.0002948466,0.0011581392,0.00008722306,0.00028973477],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032569245,0.0003440541,0.0005734182,0.00027542654,0.00079668005,0.00017501836,0.001699027,0.00038254142,0.00033982453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051201426,0.00029061086,0.00019422085,0.00022710305,0.0007805145,0.000115040755,0.00081202626,0.00202733,0.000006352523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018942989,0.00007948648,0.8068802,0.00037906098,0.00027913786,0.00009388508,0.025037386,0.14385843,0.000005403617,0.016622242,0.00020143278,0.006373948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096661225,0.000026934598,0.6702447,0.0001874764,0.000024961262,0.0000038160124,0.18939678,0.0037732709,0.000012642812,0.0017419804,0.13265513,0.0009656911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80425316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97928977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1750366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008430251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009382799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598984332","doi":"","title":"Tax Incentives and Fertility in Canada: Permanent vs. Transitory Effects","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Humanities; Political science; Fertility; Geography; Demographic economics; Demography; Welfare economics; Economics; Sociology; Population; Art","score_opus":0.012255295238351201,"score_gpt":0.21976284387024433,"score_spread":0.20750754863189314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598984332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98538107,0.0051663523,0.000042820586,0.0004953384,0.0010785359,0.0008242734,0.0011203078,0.000038062495,0.0058532404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825907,0.014649948,0.00010658137,0.000046509824,0.000084572566,0.0000019652775,0.00022648537,0.000016107642,0.0022771826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966616,0.0005742442,0.00045091033,0.0011427841,0.00066044286,0.0005100191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777615,0.00027750243,0.0004464783,0.0009879022,0.00014193545,0.00037003896],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004129078,0.00039665084,0.0007641238,0.00015215011,0.00070547586,0.00008611806,0.00096461375,0.00033829358,0.000023472292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005837033,0.00047250974,0.0000773118,0.00013209345,0.00076018233,0.00045089732,0.0010932564,0.0005154063,9.957711e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053530093,0.00062522537,0.94652873,0.0018944001,0.000821732,0.0025196394,0.01322079,0.00014512164,0.00012552267,0.00052871706,0.0203154,0.012739435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016570814,0.0000537173,0.9480097,0.00038738764,0.00036163352,0.00000828527,0.009286629,0.0006866295,0.000012484275,0.00023528797,0.038634926,0.00066622446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9726652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98681223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018319527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015724412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013089671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600741519","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720070305.007","title":"An Investigation of Rural Women Human Capital Investment in China","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; China; Investment (military); Capital (architecture); Ideology; Capital accumulation; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.011240816236471052,"score_gpt":0.2618664993031387,"score_spread":0.25062568306666766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600741519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95723367,0.000003446846,9.707712e-7,0.00024399409,0.00038398948,0.00015022865,0.000016541711,0.00001570754,0.041951474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992186,0.0000018835544,0.00006685459,0.00042011583,0.00017432851,0.0000112542875,0.0000059921954,0.0000053182885,0.00009568153],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852365,0.00007444314,0.00016519174,0.00017378792,0.00041964313,0.00064327975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989189,0.000008809206,0.00006908876,0.00013382922,0.00010198109,0.00076740223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013044433,0.00007991136,0.00011222802,0.0002564357,0.0010570639,0.00009907916,0.0005790764,0.00011138228,0.00006448553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007366708,0.00009094573,0.000020819605,0.0011131166,0.002518528,0.000495608,0.000017901493,0.00018310237,0.0000041647168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.5979988e-7,0.000009118159,0.42956743,0.000001785864,8.089398e-7,0.00000121212,0.24822146,7.941178e-7,0.016025009,0.30583668,0.000022266915,0.00031310588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009863343,0.000025894551,0.85364586,0.0000026844323,0.0000012232243,1.18144854e-7,0.1248298,0.000017996652,0.000055525237,0.020924,0.00027251776,0.00012571515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35108885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77432853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42407846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082134566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026372808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9279621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601214651","doi":"","title":"The Household Revolution: Childcare, Housework,and Female Labor Force Participation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Labour economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.010632802790265265,"score_gpt":0.19276857828232138,"score_spread":0.18213577549205612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601214651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97103745,0.0070171244,0.00034895077,0.0018923058,0.00049909373,0.0003606886,0.000012825802,0.00021399287,0.01861754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98268706,0.0018441225,0.0002555464,0.00022934302,0.0002041117,0.000032186465,0.000006794475,0.0000150860915,0.014725771],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856555,0.00015455132,0.0001839308,0.0002639955,0.0004293719,0.0004025993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990597,0.00013483051,0.00012003118,0.0002418771,0.00019690175,0.00024667368],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002668939,0.0001411162,0.00012328161,0.00005664769,0.010600713,0.00013614849,0.0002550204,0.00015112643,0.0000076061924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009128537,0.00012788038,0.00007553135,0.00028975477,0.00056283304,0.00043903769,0.00010371866,0.00016536887,0.000020133424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007340315,0.00011107189,0.55469245,0.000020651782,0.00012497611,0.000071539944,0.08665691,0.0015117713,0.00079440477,0.34828526,0.0033858195,0.004271776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044959746,0.000039497856,0.8534132,0.000027318762,0.00006361695,0.000026085763,0.06513358,0.0008927418,0.000064243315,0.0024787837,0.077148125,0.0002631597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037601084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013373733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34580648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012849345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004981906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9906874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601795952","doi":"","title":"Estimating a third-order translog demand system using Canadian micro-data","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Third order; Econometrics; Estimator; Homogeneity (statistics); Covariance; Order (exchange); Statistical hypothesis testing; Covariance matrix; Mathematics; Maximization; Economics; Mathematical optimization; Statistics","score_opus":0.0713254038682457,"score_gpt":0.354059063576109,"score_spread":0.2827336597078633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601795952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7953407,0.0007269805,0.0003041589,0.00080581155,0.0020400689,0.0018130449,0.00079392374,0.00013398286,0.19804129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464552,0.0037570717,0.04614979,0.0001704122,0.0016894713,0.00007449924,0.00028715463,0.00013076747,0.0012856418],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948642,0.0007864084,0.00080252363,0.0013269398,0.00045742647,0.0017624889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683803,0.00039631323,0.00021332924,0.0015856839,0.00027136639,0.00069524883],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006183537,0.00037618628,0.000651577,0.0006972113,0.001192937,0.00054993614,0.002376456,0.00095858076,0.00004325567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059311924,0.00045557634,0.0001244591,0.00033931577,0.00059735845,0.0002488986,0.0007835218,0.0019043512,0.000014566196],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008417202,0.0003014549,0.11861363,0.0021214348,0.00071604794,0.00041173928,0.08479396,0.6257848,0.00021451653,0.005807133,0.00043691203,0.1607142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007065065,0.00002428732,0.00469266,0.00091452,0.000058753016,0.000020327967,0.050494533,0.91934764,0.0000036681083,0.00067655434,0.021872362,0.0011881635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25688326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75156945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4946862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047734412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009283876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602367872","doi":"","title":"Impact de la Prime au travail sur l'effort au travail : une approche expérimentale","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02909443343513594,"score_gpt":0.32838086942221606,"score_spread":0.2992864359870801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602367872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75324166,0.0004396571,0.000027742548,0.00020440378,0.0007322357,0.001126473,0.00013783493,0.00006456801,0.24402545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89994633,0.062198177,0.0010368507,0.000078829944,0.0009987726,0.000250773,0.00015162543,0.00016689838,0.035171747],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99032503,0.0020700588,0.001336752,0.0018843713,0.00094972947,0.0034340343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954188,0.0012475788,0.00044259834,0.0014458054,0.00023171712,0.0012135226],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007963149,0.000906591,0.0012692678,0.00051601126,0.0012618412,0.000314211,0.0020800247,0.0018501679,0.00021382581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046978032,0.0009339138,0.0007874898,0.0007939137,0.005329988,0.00034951366,0.0008371062,0.0034170954,0.00010306983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027876877,0.0020986742,0.5994407,0.00026749022,0.0006803928,0.00019724102,0.14880249,0.014174308,0.0008723124,0.0016042179,0.0005274331,0.23105597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001927359,0.00039509352,0.87174594,0.0002425714,0.000056583045,0.000092922084,0.05200417,0.009297656,0.00013993972,0.0013195103,0.061234973,0.0015432719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06283738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021899844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27230525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015431529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0145611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602957194","doi":"","title":"Low-fee ($5/day/child) Regulated Childcare Policy and the Labor Supply of Mothers with Young Children: A Natural Experiment from Canada / La politique des services de garde à 5 $/jour et l'offre de travail des mères québécoises: résultats d'une expérience naturelle canadienne","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural experiment; Subsidy; Demographic economics; Christian ministry; Government (linguistics); Political science; Demography; Business; Geography; Socioeconomics; Economics; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.005361100643765516,"score_gpt":0.24874506142302796,"score_spread":0.24338396077926244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602957194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804725,0.005563622,0.0000016901824,0.0028200743,0.00015847392,0.0011057596,0.0012231364,0.0000294583,0.008625288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522259,0.04478586,0.00094118086,0.0005884434,0.00033659476,0.00014006457,0.00012840139,0.000100428566,0.0007530809],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933669,0.0020656723,0.00079972023,0.0011408222,0.0005173358,0.0021095364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965452,0.0010444701,0.00042909253,0.0008213743,0.00039682994,0.0007630556],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023845625,0.0007002448,0.0009110164,0.00028275145,0.0010925346,0.0002998513,0.0015621736,0.0006379463,0.000031925705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042741746,0.0006022052,0.0001658641,0.0005643936,0.004942044,0.0002640924,0.000439053,0.0019919637,3.6775546e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006045279,0.00023719555,0.33957294,0.00027052852,0.00074478023,0.00006841241,0.60473704,0.026785431,0.00023052676,0.011220411,0.000019855139,0.015508336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016633678,0.0000781317,0.80512345,0.0009222992,0.000042584703,0.00007864152,0.18645692,0.002614392,0.00020441036,0.0014327926,0.0007867481,0.00059628504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46555048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049751014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010434357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603206655","doi":"","title":"Campaign Finance in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; Political science; Public administration; Geography","score_opus":0.018136616670076735,"score_gpt":0.23485081333256866,"score_spread":0.21671419666249192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603206655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9611481,0.00029199463,0.000030505866,0.0013056988,0.0006997865,0.0009758656,0.00008649684,0.000037771806,0.035423785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.893228,0.0050454303,0.000009119716,0.0006590873,0.00014322757,0.00001147848,0.00078501325,0.000046292666,0.100072354],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966955,0.0016377347,0.00024331143,0.00034752017,0.00044883753,0.0006270646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973915,0.0012002257,0.0002772877,0.00059491204,0.0004579614,0.00007810292],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010722344,0.00035153836,0.00027425707,0.00033776712,0.002344687,0.0001842631,0.0019922447,0.00018138427,0.000038523136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010970835,0.0001917546,0.00007249916,0.002837709,0.0005918624,0.00012822675,0.00010336958,0.00085128733,0.00002275897],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018559303,0.00016387715,0.0027667747,0.00012711441,0.00027289047,0.00010261451,0.7159707,0.0021754338,0.000010177221,0.24314995,0.03271333,0.002361517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034825047,0.000023592927,0.019062296,0.00006731625,0.000121576784,0.0000010134185,0.2399689,0.0012454976,0.0000015937815,0.0013322503,0.73750645,0.00032124165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84845185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9823399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70479316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000495025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016376947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603273427","doi":"10.3386/w11279","title":"The Impact of Family Income on Child Achievement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; William T. Grant Foundation","keywords":"Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.2592858500279867,"score_gpt":0.5275383290836124,"score_spread":0.2682524790556257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603273427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065139286,0.000921479,9.3606633e-7,0.0008851559,0.00040752298,0.0005576224,0.00023624077,0.000009286341,0.93184245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748958,0.013331728,0.000027046372,0.000016250578,0.0013025687,0.000039485967,0.00013570928,0.000026870142,0.010224553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951537,0.0003997814,0.00072856573,0.0003569126,0.0028236292,0.00053735694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566144,0.0014827171,0.000440306,0.00036514108,0.0019129895,0.00013743383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0113501325,0.00018861784,0.00040182253,0.00053167634,0.00068218255,0.00008103439,0.0010142116,0.00037616564,0.00016290035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011417692,0.0001423115,0.000357153,0.00027249902,0.00077581697,0.00009472155,0.00014402035,0.0007926699,0.000068514324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013950313,0.00039958878,0.026327431,0.00007085774,0.00079346733,0.0000016258749,0.0013811868,0.0050823144,0.000027348198,0.91426015,0.045694884,0.005821622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009552818,0.00075652765,0.6513998,0.00028248582,0.000028312572,0.000002805273,0.0034555586,0.00048987084,0.000012060037,0.18240564,0.15964763,0.0005640346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026117504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033911925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9216179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046334304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01066667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603498655","doi":"","title":"The Correlation Between Husband's and Wife's Education: Canada, 1971-1996","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Correlation; Bivariate analysis; Ordered probit; Wife; Multivariate probit model; Negative correlation; Demographic economics; Demography; Positive correlation; Educational attainment; Psychology; Statistics; Econometrics; Economics; Mathematics; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Economic growth","score_opus":0.029745846143224855,"score_gpt":0.3231989110297669,"score_spread":0.29345306488654205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603498655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72635835,0.0006858778,0.0000020347977,0.0027469264,0.0012260444,0.00075799803,0.00007729103,0.000022995784,0.26812246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95374393,0.029305194,0.00008573171,0.00012602632,0.00092136074,0.000110149675,0.0001044892,0.000030480416,0.015572659],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972872,0.00052636984,0.00045271544,0.00058920035,0.0004347601,0.0007097137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977901,0.0010527372,0.00014912117,0.0005776938,0.00015358445,0.00027677772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021967874,0.00020315679,0.0002929589,0.00014622661,0.0012728072,0.00035625184,0.00057980785,0.00041345682,0.000041052797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036570855,0.00019777373,0.00006014851,0.0001618093,0.00066247507,0.00009646572,0.00029096188,0.0012625855,0.000003715063],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027069233,0.00005223614,0.45120686,0.000048051523,0.000082449376,0.000005347133,0.0077267094,0.0024910395,5.4861135e-7,0.0054053837,0.0017121434,0.53124213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022819043,0.000024184521,0.5006141,0.000089953,0.000016557387,0.0000014845316,0.02336128,0.0014325369,5.6737986e-7,0.00867158,0.4651405,0.0004190467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40427622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8681138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5308231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017346254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011125589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99448043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603615500","doi":"","title":"The Future of Gender","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.017766996507084375,"score_gpt":0.2645462122963238,"score_spread":0.24677921578923942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603615500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9554456,0.0013144262,8.4724786e-7,0.0013075016,0.0028001934,0.00011286559,0.000022727176,0.00001660642,0.03897926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948113,0.001048023,0.000046487836,0.0005734181,0.0006160986,0.000021348294,7.584684e-7,0.0000074809473,0.0028750852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903303,0.00004506555,0.00011434244,0.00011835349,0.00017932078,0.00050987717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991924,0.00010021815,0.000043913955,0.00018622831,0.00021270927,0.00026453834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046853832,0.000081629994,0.00012607271,0.00005234895,0.0012656368,0.000032048687,0.00027184573,0.00007584944,0.000045578625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001467783,0.000059345442,0.000035335685,0.00023028979,0.00060823,0.000045530396,0.000023357827,0.00015669371,0.00001344754],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026570428,0.000009306944,0.040982384,0.000016615631,0.00018083533,0.0000067900723,0.27989706,0.0000016832636,0.000052536667,0.669982,0.0062385947,0.0026295069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005946382,0.00000856371,0.013984853,0.000001174308,0.0000060613484,2.3098055e-7,0.66828346,0.0000013285269,0.0000010545621,0.020678567,0.29689306,0.00008219549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030528686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6843092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68125635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001791833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006925286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97343826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604049580","doi":"","title":"L'instabilite du revenu des parents seuls, des celibataires et des familles biparentales au Canada, 1984 a 2004","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04477728380915448,"score_gpt":0.32580256645020156,"score_spread":0.2810252826410471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604049580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9058685,0.004308628,0.00002645235,0.0002962434,0.0014682215,0.0011121699,0.0010640363,0.00006380487,0.08579196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8647955,0.12759927,0.0020455448,0.00018192502,0.0005689767,0.00017327396,0.0002715489,0.00013680077,0.0042271623],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99001867,0.002011185,0.0016088465,0.0018870244,0.0011249414,0.0033493482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99439937,0.0019187543,0.00045572527,0.0012677365,0.00084067276,0.0011177531],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064796936,0.0009335194,0.0011608338,0.00059288985,0.002393144,0.0003684662,0.0020596446,0.00094398734,0.00011453624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024560206,0.0010627975,0.00037070285,0.0010400206,0.008634459,0.0005234357,0.0015098078,0.0020548033,0.00002410149],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009739917,0.0004234056,0.82740533,0.0006594488,0.00020706264,0.00011611221,0.030076222,0.009291379,0.00003033331,0.0055636475,0.00012713694,0.12600252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079279894,0.00014157213,0.81286716,0.0012044294,0.000043001004,0.000019767233,0.12546799,0.0013366396,0.000020600848,0.014706979,0.04214163,0.0012574616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85876995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13417947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016824076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014779556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604501392","doi":"","title":"Welfare Dynamics in Canada: The Role of Individual Attributes and Economic-policy Variables","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Spell; Welfare; Dynamics (music); Social assistance; Social Welfare; Public economics; Social policy; Social dynamics; Economics; Longitudinal data; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Market economy; Demography","score_opus":0.02068295957667307,"score_gpt":0.2876097009683842,"score_spread":0.26692674139171113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604501392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92640835,0.0005375676,0.0000012707018,0.0027721084,0.00035903894,0.0008325576,0.0012624175,0.000014171,0.067812525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984281,0.014933482,0.00012733422,0.00006242124,0.00020627823,0.00008389583,0.00011677402,0.00003694258,0.00015186943],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966495,0.00049767783,0.0007431373,0.00069302024,0.00039210197,0.0010245623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980511,0.00069793797,0.00027214142,0.00065741915,0.00010597285,0.00021541897],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003097144,0.00029222807,0.00060759496,0.00045957908,0.00040669896,0.00018685899,0.001414293,0.00048256267,0.000030174171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053322944,0.00029523222,0.000085248364,0.00024095472,0.00083223183,0.00010985818,0.0012897154,0.0014021406,8.0993925e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003323934,0.00008658775,0.6259215,0.0001271466,0.00014901314,0.000013183133,0.008921236,0.06572814,0.0000017969951,0.24804774,0.000015207748,0.05095524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012811895,0.000069123016,0.5484897,0.0002897414,0.00003446827,0.0000055359537,0.30059037,0.034081884,0.000011233713,0.09262898,0.021414498,0.001103287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9488961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99524033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29166913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013506429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022117833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605294988","doi":"10.56105/cjsae.v15i1.1908","title":"Women's Transitions from Welfare: \"Where Does That Leave Us? Employable or in the Pit?\"","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Sociology; Gender studies; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.025887543370332656,"score_gpt":0.29144957973062346,"score_spread":0.2655620363602908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605294988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9748743,0.0001344755,0.000056361925,0.021772444,0.001633852,0.0007146542,0.00005527666,0.0000045809356,0.00075402186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727,0.00023951722,0.00004349856,0.0006318385,0.00044916617,0.000097074015,0.0000062115187,0.00001038379,0.0012523505],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887663,0.00020532506,0.00020698716,0.00012251279,0.0002283812,0.00036017146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911124,0.00013914765,0.000107275686,0.00018169114,0.00024750672,0.00021317232],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005692211,0.00009441007,0.00012191413,0.000116068666,0.0021551694,0.00017758475,0.0004676927,0.000055011405,0.00025356843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013308646,0.00005257434,0.000055146895,0.00037578947,0.00011931954,0.00018225201,0.0000027161864,0.00019559929,0.0000021187238],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003302643,0.00033535782,0.21535452,0.0000062499007,0.00007110865,0.000005002298,0.77186537,0.00011384563,0.0000033720914,0.0023228552,0.0033004703,0.0065888427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027525186,0.00008064433,0.2862375,0.000014991074,0.00003065002,0.0000029771106,0.68682957,0.000008628836,2.4323265e-7,0.0028258464,0.023629839,0.00006383809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27444753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94577897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67133147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032809033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018421565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606477231","doi":"","title":"Summary Of: The Instability of Family Earnings and Family Income in Canada, 1986 to 1991 and 1996 to 2001","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Economics; Context (archaeology); Family income; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Instability; Volatility (finance); Economic stability; Financial economics; Geography; Finance; Economic growth; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.029653179758827468,"score_gpt":0.3038027380775354,"score_spread":0.2741495583187079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606477231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9678965,0.00024341869,5.479623e-7,0.0006503454,0.00023313731,0.0010605976,0.00022565312,0.000006474991,0.029683316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911488,0.0075184708,0.00042528883,0.00027169337,0.000059316797,0.000056918998,0.000008370083,0.000024041201,0.00048707135],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658275,0.00062293623,0.00075584056,0.0007393563,0.00050224,0.0007968604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979323,0.0006528287,0.00018590597,0.0006996607,0.00015860853,0.0003706686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037030699,0.00023769487,0.00062719727,0.0003762913,0.00018682869,0.000048547492,0.0008800401,0.00030331782,0.0000066976545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009563321,0.00023423645,0.00006729882,0.00044463127,0.00062918296,0.00007970894,0.0016809975,0.0010794933,4.3290098e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005351731,0.000047364872,0.96303076,0.000120226985,0.000020418523,0.0000030393496,0.0077220635,0.0041339193,0.00019159884,0.00023722835,0.000055532328,0.024384327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002315851,0.000035572517,0.97060364,0.00016999703,0.0000037882155,2.5466753e-7,0.019174498,0.00046120436,0.000005760214,0.0003173633,0.008771662,0.0002246414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9091363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98477525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07563894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022771875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048979083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9551885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606599695","doi":"","title":"Earnings of Couples with High and Low Levels of Education, 1980-2000","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Business; Economics; Labour economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.025363118907494462,"score_gpt":0.3125504945362006,"score_spread":0.2871873756287061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606599695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96743006,0.0002576261,0.000008354432,0.0002122307,0.00021717133,0.000510036,0.0000990985,0.000013374641,0.031252056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98504776,0.011552597,0.0011344092,0.000025249476,0.000111122274,0.00004327301,0.000023654185,0.000029244575,0.0020327203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795353,0.00020805061,0.0004856197,0.00051856885,0.0003695615,0.0004646909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830735,0.0003187334,0.00032251186,0.00046772996,0.0004193072,0.00016436375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016348973,0.0001859738,0.00047628948,0.0003519037,0.00017672467,0.00006334522,0.0005063363,0.0003582368,0.000046737696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034580662,0.00019323583,0.000061598534,0.00020644134,0.0014065164,0.00009009147,0.00027870378,0.00069690205,0.0000010300082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019730662,0.00096740463,0.6887948,0.0017837819,0.00032578793,0.00000923334,0.09611491,0.0414209,0.00036842327,0.05736977,0.000033436318,0.11261425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010352926,0.00023668945,0.91676813,0.001128542,0.000030786712,0.0000029507423,0.05963198,0.00061329984,0.00014427525,0.01564114,0.0041017686,0.00066511804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006940062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005643863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22797336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000758977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009149786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607414586","doi":"10.3386/w11135","title":"How Does Job-Protected Maternity Leave Affect Mothers' Employment and Infant Health?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Maternity leave; Parental leave; Demographic economics; Psychology; Environmental health; Nursing; Medicine; Business; Labour economics; Work (physics); Sick leave; Economics; Communication; Engineering","score_opus":0.21728740702678848,"score_gpt":0.4875320037221494,"score_spread":0.27024459669536094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607414586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4861022,0.0040026754,0.000034428285,0.02202846,0.0020062178,0.0048439577,0.0011108676,0.0001297695,0.47974142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94210726,0.013563106,0.00035040337,0.00007165647,0.0019185462,0.00016606806,0.00015742249,0.000054420205,0.041611094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954763,0.0006913191,0.0005090444,0.0005819155,0.0020765446,0.00066490006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971778,0.00059207005,0.00038229433,0.00026422276,0.0013245166,0.00025909592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008404752,0.00023495789,0.00055916945,0.0006289224,0.00055280107,0.0002850464,0.000474819,0.00048518545,0.00022757392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009882574,0.00020526738,0.00012684129,0.00018581512,0.0006698276,0.00020590198,0.00016508457,0.0007234363,0.000022500839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038936007,0.00083286065,0.31916323,0.0031305328,0.002254329,0.000027615846,0.030985113,0.0005648416,0.0004234861,0.4536152,0.14407644,0.044536997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025446762,0.00083140796,0.38821402,0.00076698617,0.000058380832,0.000024574929,0.016777033,0.0008134842,0.00011188923,0.18569899,0.40236568,0.0017928763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06131592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03847683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4560051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035189565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007910153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608863253","doi":"","title":"Perinatal Family Labour Supply: Historical Trends and the Modern Experience","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Wife; Labour supply; Earnings; Economics; Demographic economics; Baby boom; Labour economics; Census; Population; Demography; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03946694184180337,"score_gpt":0.32279829470276883,"score_spread":0.28333135286096545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608863253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8644344,0.0011860414,0.0000091233305,0.0015342853,0.0009213904,0.0004253525,0.00006745869,0.000055016626,0.13136692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88458294,0.09086152,0.00026051464,0.00013571494,0.0004097319,0.00024878635,0.000015955087,0.00004360104,0.023441227],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595475,0.00079021,0.0005611961,0.0010027194,0.0006309707,0.001060158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978529,0.0006709269,0.00015274165,0.000843669,0.00016079927,0.00031893817],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002246787,0.00032797945,0.000604622,0.00038951915,0.0009848087,0.0002658009,0.0012883836,0.00059533917,0.000041766165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052972377,0.00029406988,0.00019533183,0.00028177438,0.002395572,0.00015611674,0.0011804615,0.001826507,0.000003930808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041099146,0.00034815932,0.095720805,0.00015672183,0.0001701122,0.00022095723,0.35824206,0.0040633585,0.00005018677,0.033773568,0.0007797636,0.50606334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004624238,0.00017012765,0.2853105,0.00016153828,0.000028756484,0.00004163178,0.08227193,0.045223955,0.000004869392,0.025286755,0.55475587,0.0021198294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075661405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002547639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55397606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026679863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011501078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1616586911","doi":"10.1080/08865655.2015.1042009","title":"Female Labor Force Participation and Dependency Ratios in Border States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Borderlands Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dependency ratio; Dependency (UML); Economics; Fertility; Demographic economics; Inequality; Population; Labour economics; Total fertility rate; Demography; Sociology; Family planning; Research methodology","score_opus":0.05109744858826824,"score_gpt":0.37229886623901465,"score_spread":0.3212014176507464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1616586911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890303,0.007824275,0.00023252219,0.0015744595,0.0003729158,0.00010050695,0.0000035886235,0.000013188596,0.00084822776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904236,0.008135306,0.0005511063,0.0001587591,0.00017190447,0.000005196749,0.0000010150757,0.000009182462,0.00054391235],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987684,0.00014573536,0.00038085986,0.00009732221,0.0003702772,0.00023741636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873775,0.0001573554,0.00022212048,0.0000589636,0.00070388673,0.0001199201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011396919,0.00009475638,0.00026585557,0.00011499717,0.0001493059,0.000052186297,0.0000912178,0.000054710363,0.0000036050865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008232417,0.00007566447,0.00002981473,0.0002698216,0.00012660853,0.00034350462,0.00003144546,0.00012699803,9.592355e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044598153,0.000070582435,0.8271541,0.00001782491,0.00006839464,0.000018245872,0.16901655,0.0004754936,0.000009270104,0.0010636,0.0006696177,0.001391705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025883606,0.00052495574,0.32541668,0.00008608782,0.00008827838,0.0000059186195,0.6422122,0.00062147016,0.000013453672,0.017352412,0.010811754,0.00027840614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024037572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009843546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5017374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008506446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024174509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5492929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1622507769","doi":"10.3917/rfas.021.0073","title":"Portée et limites de la réforme de l'aide sociale aux États-Unis","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue française des affaires sociales","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.060409329575093665,"score_gpt":0.295495451165836,"score_spread":0.23508612159074233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1622507769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80426383,0.068113655,0.0007207547,0.01837177,0.0016523808,0.0004783378,0.0003173489,0.000405471,0.10567643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91442734,0.05665331,0.0058559487,0.0013451469,0.0024078442,0.000053909484,0.000033490935,0.00014389424,0.019079119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945399,0.0015693387,0.00072160107,0.00067730056,0.00061886385,0.001872992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966329,0.0016208366,0.00039745844,0.00040944837,0.00033131606,0.0006080523],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017676819,0.00061741855,0.0007963276,0.00017957926,0.0035487993,0.00043268767,0.0008281676,0.0010911288,0.0009331585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012538164,0.0007651104,0.00073414925,0.0011664984,0.007889397,0.00079403224,0.00016240888,0.0008362748,0.00034276646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021221093,0.0009405669,0.14530882,0.00070067745,0.00032675228,0.000327421,0.3119703,0.00017781573,0.0003204387,0.44670317,0.034352094,0.05885075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014940928,0.00023551875,0.12325389,0.0009274506,0.00069491664,0.00010397533,0.10557374,0.003386871,0.000053189946,0.25445592,0.50773656,0.0020838776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015744282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025925254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47338447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012975206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022565457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1647816935","doi":"10.1007/s10680-010-9222-x","title":"Where Are the Babies? Labor Market Conditions and Fertility in Europe","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":291,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Fertility; Unemployment; Economics; Total fertility rate; Demographic economics; Birth rate; Labour economics; Population; Demography; Economic growth; Family planning; Research methodology","score_opus":0.015684032625476137,"score_gpt":0.25970612884199756,"score_spread":0.24402209621652143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1647816935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863147,0.00067799044,0.00007824475,0.004566969,0.00084859174,0.00015656486,0.000035207384,0.00003176325,0.007289961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962825,0.0017620372,0.0005266313,0.00030177605,0.000487713,9.915349e-7,0.0000070022766,0.00003540217,0.00059590983],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964843,0.0020790775,0.00062595145,0.00020639235,0.0002755234,0.00032874598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823886,0.00021125229,0.0005665073,0.00027624058,0.00048249078,0.00022464305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037805948,0.00016064671,0.00022623982,0.0003116835,0.0004986654,0.00017288081,0.00043471262,0.000052452444,0.000086727436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012323669,0.0001343656,0.00010782462,0.0013163622,0.00036347413,0.00030466527,0.000054957985,0.00075256435,0.000007609296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003377993,0.000070088536,0.9883931,0.000022602788,0.000018517647,0.00014262726,0.0030200104,0.000050033017,0.00028021602,0.0052354354,0.001836006,0.00089758384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036091637,0.000043854332,0.9591048,0.00007204314,0.000030269211,0.00004090943,0.002855028,0.000075266464,6.2607927e-7,0.00081884273,0.036459934,0.00013750509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000081337224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00305827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03462393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025897689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051513354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.547927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1653396053","doi":"10.7202/007304ar","title":"Earnings Supplements and Job Quality among Former Welfare Recipients","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; BC Research (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"Sugar Research and Development Corporation","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Demographic economics; Social assistance; Labour economics; Quality (philosophy); Business; Economics; Psychology; Economic growth; Accounting","score_opus":0.038792285615614125,"score_gpt":0.3083412726203591,"score_spread":0.26954898700474494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1653396053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9090446,0.00007108937,0.00038034283,0.0007296059,0.00024480763,0.00020993999,0.000025714215,0.000044062224,0.08924981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98675865,0.00014462265,0.0004412322,0.000039867227,0.000041491763,0.000012096322,0.000026627868,0.000010063707,0.01252535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986452,0.00026964548,0.00025656712,0.00021594836,0.00030937267,0.00030325312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937856,0.00011282713,0.000111429945,0.00014995439,0.00010439142,0.00014286206],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007438601,0.00010476412,0.00011688196,0.000084662024,0.0013423769,0.00007478795,0.00010578887,0.00027812584,0.0005197617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006636621,0.000108886736,0.000037287748,0.0004235663,0.00023024586,0.00027112657,0.000026729576,0.00028792277,0.000025324776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010983384,0.00002005924,0.91804403,5.6175696e-7,0.000014890715,4.223346e-7,0.0073736575,0.000016483025,0.0000019290705,0.072214514,0.0014891197,0.0008232334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025782164,0.000010927055,0.7441042,0.000007995654,0.000015660762,2.644808e-7,0.029338358,0.000012905088,0.0000034594905,0.0010562141,0.22506279,0.00012939915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001634735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010822023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22357367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008940031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013263494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W166250571","doi":"","title":"'Mainstream yet?: Women, development and the last quarter century'","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Repository (Kingston University London)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Mainstream; Relevance (law); Inclusion (mineral); Work (physics); Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Environmental ethics; Development economics; Social science; History; Economics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.018160239978255378,"score_gpt":0.25948297301514817,"score_spread":0.24132273303689278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W166250571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92381567,0.00014222102,0.00009317165,0.00079603127,0.00026156558,0.00033005443,0.0000018504054,0.00006767435,0.074491784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942865,0.0004438337,0.00023075136,0.00006972014,0.00010370961,0.0000034343523,0.0000025048823,0.000009891547,0.004849704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971393,0.0006351419,0.00014449714,0.00036189627,0.0009534043,0.0007657755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987944,0.00023961828,0.00006413945,0.00026437244,0.0003173334,0.0003201526],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018067139,0.00013158575,0.00017411743,0.0002197931,0.0033882684,0.0002035728,0.00052143424,0.00013553142,0.00000882978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000093980656,0.00011442646,0.000056469744,0.0006223419,0.0017456885,0.00029217443,0.00020608156,0.00044643192,0.00002811892],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044646874,0.00031551695,0.03947114,0.00006460894,0.0001775881,0.0004775173,0.40000895,0.000064951855,0.00054947834,0.5542977,0.0008308224,0.0032952884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00536939,0.00014627502,0.0699671,0.00010211552,0.000022933415,0.000020553844,0.43129978,0.000029470413,0.000361077,0.002482227,0.4897202,0.0004788964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030623756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022291006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55181545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001495131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010462528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1676984392","doi":"10.1007/s00148-015-0557-9","title":"Inter-generational effects of disability benefits: evidence from Canadian social assistance programs","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Anxiety; Cognition; Social policy; Payment; Developmental psychology; Cognitive skill; Economics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.053349180212984015,"score_gpt":0.2962671969217656,"score_spread":0.2429180167087816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1676984392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99675745,0.00020750513,0.0004549565,0.0009504434,0.0012836293,0.0001211816,0.00002667194,0.000004954396,0.00019319354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714375,0.000065901,0.0018806633,0.00006885058,0.0007858656,0.0000018713204,0.000023769384,0.000006759038,0.000022561913],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890655,0.00014334857,0.0005087965,0.000109557215,0.0001705373,0.00016122045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998711,0.000116799325,0.00052620267,0.00008538554,0.0003186699,0.0002419697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080757553,0.00007795577,0.00021413386,0.000052459938,0.00015346326,0.000074231975,0.00020002968,0.00010787776,0.000010743337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004446188,0.00008185577,0.00009606816,0.00009714424,0.00012693703,0.00056657323,0.000012360297,0.000105824074,0.0000017988779],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018762912,0.000044001034,0.97886014,0.0000072963217,0.000025487692,5.4924664e-7,0.005414399,0.0014806021,0.0000059561526,0.007200722,0.00011803408,0.006824055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002989583,0.000061221275,0.9873163,0.000049033657,0.00002994568,5.991745e-7,0.002830311,0.0011839686,0.0000072253993,0.0072006336,0.0009134609,0.0001083278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07623819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55537564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47913745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011644705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005955819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9299132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W168741960","doi":"","title":"Effects of New Welfare Reform Strategies on Welfare Participation: Microdata Estimates from Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Welfare; Economics; Unemployment; Demographic economics; Immigration; Unemployment rate; Social Welfare; Public economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Geography; Political science; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.03677970286540949,"score_gpt":0.28640354887690905,"score_spread":0.24962384601149956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W168741960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95825446,0.00014671878,0.0009770804,0.004490972,0.00034907908,0.001047022,0.0023940238,0.000067794535,0.03227285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925668,0.0008923678,0.003345101,0.000013761761,0.00008717594,4.2086842e-7,0.0006602678,0.000021189117,0.0024129055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575394,0.0008118227,0.00021219617,0.00083494786,0.0015162907,0.0008707888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680877,0.0005494322,0.00036253966,0.0008642505,0.0007475888,0.00066745013],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044976745,0.0003478012,0.0006645195,0.0005533473,0.0017703364,0.00008769701,0.0024949082,0.0003628087,0.00062123744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019561054,0.00044565304,0.00021983152,0.0006066573,0.0014964399,0.00046316386,0.0020562687,0.0011844783,0.000023062279],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033619832,0.0024209365,0.05212996,0.0052486933,0.004824309,0.0027987058,0.3088531,0.0041604144,0.005116843,0.50701964,0.07517651,0.028888898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018355997,0.00034156637,0.48012787,0.0006290402,0.00032289076,4.7502783e-7,0.42790994,0.0009897347,0.00013305398,0.011987494,0.07486392,0.0008584296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9861432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92609763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49503216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012834158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051396773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1698552157","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0351.2010.00390.x","title":"Young children and women's labour force participation in Russia, 1992–2004<sup>1</sup>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics of Transition","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Economics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.006832753705303281,"score_gpt":0.23362609961266292,"score_spread":0.22679334590735964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1698552157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975956,0.00001978561,0.00029817352,0.00046375924,0.0001247967,0.00019394279,0.00006510162,0.000019847335,0.001218957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99911904,0.00019201341,0.00032645473,0.00011708295,0.000115570045,0.000015644731,0.000038733655,0.00000972577,0.00006573867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923074,0.000046263987,0.00023513005,0.00017960688,0.00005952164,0.0002487181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996828,0.00002924955,0.0000717514,0.00010636055,0.000023452974,0.00008637605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004980475,0.00008421811,0.00014830413,0.00008874355,0.00012357555,0.000042575593,0.000090747715,0.00013483617,0.00004320054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018513281,0.000102020385,0.00003147278,0.00009036756,0.00012686437,0.0003464808,0.0000066755088,0.00012948803,0.0000046417163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116107636,0.00037076583,0.48125443,0.000053479143,0.00007266457,0.000001661931,0.3076766,0.019343812,0.0016044652,0.18185876,0.000040846517,0.0076063843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095570175,0.000057774243,0.9621832,0.000009956249,0.000015490199,0.0000012649151,0.0091641,0.008022767,0.00009149232,0.019107275,0.00016169636,0.0002292941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021209826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008042203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48092875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007101825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007025964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4487738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1699555348","doi":"","title":"Pensioners' travel concessions - a misallocation of resources","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; TRIPS architecture; Business; Order (exchange); Quarter (Canadian coin); Pension; Public transport; Cash; Economics; Labour economics; Public economics; Finance; Market economy","score_opus":0.025391376882159956,"score_gpt":0.2514882462829759,"score_spread":0.22609686940081594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1699555348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86022764,0.0011882933,0.0015771021,0.0009956587,0.00040150605,0.00076351635,0.0012631154,0.000108035776,0.1334751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741151,0.003144567,0.00964389,0.00007117322,0.0001415422,0.0000016251116,0.00054784823,0.000046701036,0.012287552],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995806,0.001027218,0.0005617054,0.00082730094,0.0011724548,0.00060535315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666226,0.00053291,0.000840673,0.0010180665,0.0006127921,0.00033332114],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008823103,0.0004459915,0.00089089555,0.00047061703,0.0010741962,0.00003573171,0.0020579365,0.00059788366,0.00021387398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024553124,0.0005504314,0.00062292564,0.00041286016,0.002911053,0.00015622159,0.0012818747,0.0010415856,0.000009659016],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007673035,0.0016487346,0.05139991,0.0011008956,0.0007357651,0.00015691973,0.89612323,0.0023535986,0.0028589421,0.022484468,0.011809298,0.008560918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023999223,0.00027305592,0.34467602,0.0016608614,0.0007020984,0.0000072207235,0.5554395,0.01153073,0.000035984605,0.009396669,0.07230529,0.0015726422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08799494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04498765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34068376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028328976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001444212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1741206749","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2029237","title":"How Can Bill and Melinda Gates Increase Other People’s Donations to Fund Public Goods?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Business; Donation; Fund raising; Public administration; Finance; Economic growth; Economics; Public economics; Marketing; Political science; Microeconomics; Higher education","score_opus":0.023622788598801667,"score_gpt":0.27338589328037455,"score_spread":0.24976310468157287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1741206749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.958984,0.0020313002,0.0016208458,0.03198955,0.0004005191,0.00020324829,0.000017333032,0.000045783916,0.0047074156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99123883,0.0026528197,0.00017758246,0.00055902137,0.000817112,0.000008545299,0.0000041888807,0.000022426637,0.0045194756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966735,0.00023121509,0.00015764436,0.00016035025,0.0003823305,0.002394946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989958,0.00009002062,0.000102719416,0.00012167763,0.00016010992,0.0005296995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023358902,0.00014210232,0.0001540342,0.00017855901,0.0009008549,0.0003756634,0.00025478197,0.00010332748,0.00005315291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003232532,0.000112462505,0.00006193771,0.0004682908,0.00008728992,0.0005230799,0.00004997503,0.0006871478,0.0000115641915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075412136,0.00009147539,0.42026427,0.000002597519,0.00009471895,4.4624772e-7,0.014264652,0.0000026235248,0.00008585308,0.55827093,0.00024928688,0.006665622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013496878,0.00032678703,0.20747414,0.000017304084,0.00015518117,0.00017400112,0.30319458,0.00006826419,0.000010820333,0.24444062,0.2418364,0.0009522181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008695932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32833356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31963763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074692746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022615315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99790525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1748798060","doi":"10.3280/spe2010-001001","title":"Abolishing poverty: the history and significance of the North American Guaranteed Annual Income Social Experiments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Period (music); Politics; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Social science; History; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Art","score_opus":0.017609307399046023,"score_gpt":0.26540776806849564,"score_spread":0.2477984606694496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1748798060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9780873,0.0008366837,0.0000012355301,0.0006328833,0.0016789391,0.00013975226,0.000069232134,0.00001193187,0.018542044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938477,0.00016080837,0.000040423405,0.0009561015,0.0006587234,0.0000063848292,9.922978e-7,0.000011550627,0.0043172864],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917406,0.00011631752,0.00023324431,0.00017250316,0.00009847263,0.00020540801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993095,0.000077908175,0.00033238548,0.00018793726,0.00003110892,0.000061152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028295288,0.000111943315,0.0002374337,0.000059804486,0.0002678307,0.000009281843,0.0003370176,0.000059649516,0.00002007855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041704767,0.00008726382,0.000068986126,0.00006676195,0.0022928552,0.00017221287,0.00006688527,0.00017449184,0.0000011719346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070333364,0.00007428137,0.29751262,0.00004086137,0.000071609866,4.975622e-7,0.45640445,0.000004841856,0.0020231071,0.19185217,0.04757575,0.004369491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021467719,0.000017429613,0.38627318,0.0000029238975,0.00001584926,6.2116794e-7,0.0073617785,0.000019357723,0.000007161086,0.00031848054,0.6056432,0.00012534882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017613906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016188163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55806744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005169976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008537105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1765037568","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2256147","title":"Wage Differentials of Males and Females in Same-Sex and Different-Sex Couples in Canada, 2006-2010","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Sex segregation; Psychology; Demographic economics; Demography; Economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.01208164622761321,"score_gpt":0.23424474406632484,"score_spread":0.22216309783871163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1765037568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99385923,0.004994152,0.00006454155,0.00049781,0.00013164306,0.00017878358,0.000012016895,0.00000501635,0.00025678356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768146,0.021602554,0.000018291448,0.000045303495,0.000069940244,0.000005480353,0.000002736447,0.000011886847,0.0014291594],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756324,0.00019246817,0.00036343807,0.00018730032,0.0003100976,0.0013834657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994496,0.00013898932,0.00014561441,0.00009058637,0.000046962,0.00012822566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072102214,0.00015686292,0.00033673993,0.00014197294,0.00016069248,0.00006802467,0.0001993496,0.00009712638,0.00004336577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006158934,0.00013430015,0.000031179898,0.0001397314,0.00018124824,0.00015284792,0.000042029325,0.00069494045,7.3303465e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061090013,0.000038418875,0.9813417,0.000011025771,0.000025821133,0.0000025634147,0.0022801845,0.0000059955814,0.0005052743,0.010678488,0.000024690733,0.005079725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005023131,0.00004653165,0.9127061,0.000027822207,0.000011080076,0.00001067579,0.050165053,0.00021307971,0.000019472862,0.036104552,0.000037336522,0.0001560122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7596048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99530417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23569933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071765896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024684898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5476601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1786593012","doi":"10.3386/w29041","title":"The Decline of Drudgery and the Paradox of Hard Work","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University; University of Michigan; Brown University","keywords":"Work (physics); Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.29959205930714017,"score_gpt":0.5016455162748077,"score_spread":0.20205345696766752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1786593012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08875834,0.0213736,0.000010710335,0.010699667,0.0015447997,0.0010491174,0.00020204345,0.000008334675,0.8763534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9118261,0.06576412,0.00018027949,0.00003585774,0.0008634824,0.000049386974,0.000100330806,0.000021087944,0.021159397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629945,0.00063571247,0.00071935024,0.00025482549,0.0018129236,0.00027772947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990084,0.0064255707,0.00046087988,0.00029167347,0.0026769522,0.000060910766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018023327,0.0001053837,0.00044728565,0.00017410488,0.00037402095,0.00006485679,0.0006567874,0.00026173663,0.00007600033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044468273,0.00007078823,0.00018416114,0.00031773208,0.002566949,0.00005351022,0.00023582001,0.00045065675,0.0000037459954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014437064,0.00006181333,0.019806245,0.00012643253,0.00036163596,0.0000011806935,0.002180847,0.00013791294,0.000009238202,0.9304361,0.043628696,0.0031055785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012476773,0.000058370562,0.05517087,0.00025437324,0.00006404402,0.00000405785,0.01112509,0.00024384583,0.0000301295,0.74771225,0.18381888,0.00027039216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005683726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003023079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.855194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034499404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007319458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1790435558","doi":"10.1596/1813-9450-6148","title":"Reforming Subsidies: A Tool-Kit for Policy Simulations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Computer science; Economics; Business; Environmental economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.034774264437995646,"score_gpt":0.30598462095529755,"score_spread":0.2712103565173019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1790435558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00272412,0.000618853,0.00044354738,0.00068389525,0.0020877062,0.001874005,0.00055855257,0.0004911598,0.99051815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060299672,0.00007937388,0.001252739,0.000919912,0.006764867,0.000115469826,0.00034087384,0.00020395078,0.93002313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956609,0.00015681736,0.00090825977,0.00076424296,0.0008961057,0.0016136854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682266,0.000849338,0.0006154076,0.00085013686,0.00047078828,0.00039168255],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012633819,0.0007097905,0.0008310201,0.0008809542,0.0021407825,0.00036264182,0.0010693091,0.00077314035,0.00012271262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004504489,0.0007378391,0.00055506424,0.00029818428,0.0006189949,0.00036594935,0.00021288416,0.00079760764,0.00009127349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034669927,0.00006135761,0.00082286657,0.0002785754,0.00024667173,0.000004749695,0.051242393,0.00007112353,0.000046536177,0.91046286,0.026488839,0.010239333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004244595,0.000026759193,0.00023705082,0.00022787061,0.00020333218,0.0000010304095,0.0015318636,0.00007383192,0.000009135218,0.07081448,0.925545,0.0009051758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021415344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04877315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89905614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020440856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035583503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1795115279","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1491505","title":"Social Jealousy and Stigma - Negative Externalities of Social Assistance Payments in Germany","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Payment; Jealousy; Stigma (botany); Social assistance; Social stigma; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Criminology; Psychiatry; Economic growth; Microeconomics; Medicine; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)","score_opus":0.012835535274260148,"score_gpt":0.29220009494914917,"score_spread":0.27936455967488905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1795115279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908874,0.0010991807,0.00039861453,0.001400374,0.00010378522,0.00009872529,0.0000067013184,0.000013886482,0.0059913183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956292,0.0022235492,0.000045190587,0.00013775897,0.00039118234,0.0000015999199,8.970399e-7,0.000008144295,0.001562499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743915,0.00025869507,0.0003143005,0.00015489101,0.00043817604,0.0013947637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995104,0.00004777846,0.00023760939,0.000043131593,0.00010068844,0.000060367904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013972309,0.00012583807,0.0002388689,0.00009864463,0.00067259313,0.000064306005,0.00021854574,0.00011671858,0.000012233144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004989984,0.00012699378,0.00009304155,0.0002349757,0.00025071556,0.00024279159,0.000015908692,0.0008152104,0.000001203098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079272606,0.00012172468,0.036264133,0.0000068907602,0.000076289114,0.0000061057513,0.06986438,0.0000030516405,0.0001863824,0.88124585,0.00008098866,0.012064942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007818687,0.000114731854,0.43532038,0.000013980675,0.000020776213,0.000006719345,0.06370615,0.000016359789,0.000004765404,0.49941626,0.00043743305,0.00016057311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005091646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008481985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39905626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006097642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00142275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5178656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1810989105","doi":"10.21696/rcsl072014585","title":"La configuración de la maternidad a través de la inversión social en los niños. Ejemplos de Canadá y México","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de El Colegio de San Luis","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.008732888998361705,"score_gpt":0.29144794714581185,"score_spread":0.2827150581474501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1810989105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9385666,0.000658699,0.0025764166,0.00088410155,0.00018211146,0.000530241,0.00029472818,0.00018748129,0.056119595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99183357,0.0018450635,0.00072168914,0.0026866118,0.0013809854,0.000058802798,0.000028025757,0.000114054936,0.0013311807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98968816,0.0065729837,0.00059055426,0.0006687739,0.00069364544,0.0017858755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661183,0.0014986955,0.0003661945,0.00046585142,0.00017486293,0.00088256976],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051602297,0.00058505207,0.0007891,0.00020262602,0.00097136793,0.0012773259,0.0011382983,0.0013080556,0.00017610186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087066245,0.0006817706,0.00040916525,0.00059945945,0.0013033843,0.00018866491,0.00012440796,0.0010485001,0.00006063298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001210106,0.00039961384,0.65133464,0.0010163165,0.00039243494,0.00039837346,0.062913485,0.00005226003,0.0039343177,0.25026178,0.023970474,0.00520527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015478905,0.00014857673,0.52676785,0.00041942918,0.0005595917,0.00012198783,0.013299291,0.0020700896,0.00016578118,0.0051094857,0.44866058,0.0011294776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028993925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058462285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4246901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024649808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003996453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1814024343","doi":"10.25336/p6xw4v","title":"Reproductive Choices in Gibraltar: A Case Study of a Community In Transition, 1960-1996","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Politics; Transition (genetics); Sociology; Structuring; Economic growth; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.08167978856203234,"score_gpt":0.36742987816964345,"score_spread":0.2857500896076111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1814024343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99785113,0.0002960621,0.0000034827756,0.00014753807,0.00023323167,0.00053494895,0.000010072108,0.000008624743,0.00091492524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99973255,0.00004134834,0.00003913972,0.00008223266,0.000055117882,0.00001580166,0.000009335449,0.000006018368,0.000018474306],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985159,0.00048391928,0.00039298245,0.00016281183,0.00014792987,0.00029645412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941045,0.00013680781,0.000078502584,0.00019474221,0.0001020609,0.00007743603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022335798,0.00008705813,0.00022019751,0.00053620397,0.00031681688,0.0000078393605,0.00010234985,0.00007433512,0.0000021677627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038681494,0.00010135952,0.000017088541,0.0011622627,0.00014458809,0.00017834693,0.000014267286,0.00023153696,3.1302847e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005762518,0.00008749307,0.59871036,0.000010091826,0.0000074250656,0.00011637948,0.39982596,0.00043362306,6.8952176e-7,0.00025629433,0.000008233673,0.00053769624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025754704,0.000027705226,0.5356357,0.0000152088805,0.0000038040293,0.000002150639,0.46335185,0.00001923272,1.7613486e-7,0.0006093097,0.000023296054,0.0000539806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9812688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99977237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06352591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092397776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012339596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41333213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1817140984","doi":"10.7202/029301ar","title":"Male-Female Pay Inequity and Public Policy in Canada and the U.S.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Face value; Perspective (graphical); Public policy; Value (mathematics); Face (sociological concept); Economics; Public economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Social science; Accounting; Finance","score_opus":0.028301912200555893,"score_gpt":0.26385237633128733,"score_spread":0.23555046413073144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1817140984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9447598,0.0005257667,0.000029071914,0.030798312,0.000054086227,0.00015569008,0.000012807299,0.000010470104,0.023653995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952527,0.0009218392,0.000069628455,0.00031509416,0.0001684029,0.000008037526,0.0000036115237,0.000004195168,0.0032564637],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991791,0.00014451741,0.00015643532,0.00012032032,0.0001670436,0.00023257436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994499,0.00026856747,0.000046326764,0.000105916726,0.000034534034,0.00009474299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004042645,0.00006620759,0.0000924615,0.000078860096,0.0004878645,0.00006710333,0.000105699284,0.00011425162,0.00005240645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046372184,0.00004631697,0.00001100602,0.0005166533,0.00031427864,0.00016215348,0.000047975,0.00026545482,0.0000027402627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000152075,0.000007673941,0.8802237,3.8874973e-7,0.0000050118265,6.6239204e-7,0.0044374494,0.0001041743,2.7364578e-7,0.10337322,0.0006946997,0.011151245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000896491,0.0000051993175,0.75227016,0.000009215209,0.000012169132,0.0000057895973,0.05021084,0.0015992454,5.984598e-7,0.0023595374,0.19246489,0.00016587331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9239716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9872777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19177018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029036342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002680441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4754987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1819795793","doi":"10.1111/caje.12132","title":"The effect of universal child benefits on labour supply","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Labour supply; Economics; Child labour; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Significant difference; Medicine; Internal medicine; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.059108668858203844,"score_gpt":0.19313148301020644,"score_spread":0.1340228141520026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1819795793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98384535,0.00042008757,0.000003353341,0.0032706342,0.002410689,0.00023557396,0.00020185582,0.000004767227,0.009607695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978825,0.00034312048,0.000033962086,0.0002650346,0.0006946386,0.0000032570294,0.0000052157884,0.000028947094,0.0007433286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829423,0.00023531549,0.0005265416,0.00020209172,0.000008534648,0.00073328946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963477,0.0003868783,0.00051271654,0.00030338674,0.0002856923,0.0021636123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019750819,0.00020519721,0.0004459611,0.00034398073,0.0005521141,0.00012460712,0.0008297899,0.0001895458,0.000039256265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057608495,0.00019247804,0.00019300346,0.00016883976,0.00039558185,0.00026334875,0.000015241812,0.00035208877,0.0000130573735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011523837,0.000005604558,0.060961366,0.000010711435,0.000114989445,0.000044311913,0.0064427825,0.0104951225,6.387795e-7,0.9174609,0.0010216658,0.003326638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008574461,0.008369732,0.08762468,0.0006135886,0.00033771092,0.00040927937,0.066656984,0.0017011481,0.00025321514,0.15386721,0.66941494,0.0021770613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36677518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99334383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76359373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023222095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035225544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78490263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1833480845","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v8n8p42","title":"Income Generating Activities of Rural Kenyan Women","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pennsylvania State University; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Livelihood; Kenya; Economic growth; Work (physics); Household income; Business; Order (exchange); Economics; Socioeconomics; Agriculture; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.01751938688345989,"score_gpt":0.26326094853775567,"score_spread":0.24574156165429578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1833480845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995005,0.00021546967,0.0005008023,0.0001230831,0.00034392244,0.00009983046,5.498564e-7,0.000009717699,0.0037015902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893909,0.00007024777,0.004711875,0.00004887073,0.00019703167,0.000004705503,6.475375e-7,0.000009756629,0.0055659506],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809533,0.0001278193,0.00050838507,0.00006040067,0.0007101528,0.0004979336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821675,0.000052844272,0.00044219114,0.00007575972,0.00094359816,0.0002688296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025285496,0.000105725645,0.00027416676,0.00022514042,0.0002870545,0.00007922905,0.00027248342,0.00007306396,0.000023008908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027074444,0.000094300376,0.000046564197,0.00033451305,0.00010993099,0.00046715123,0.000082119834,0.00015362869,0.0000013727683],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087755325,0.00016964183,0.16466926,0.00012330402,0.000161567,0.0001618442,0.81663954,0.0012201701,0.00033952793,0.012224125,0.00076812383,0.0034351633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048384425,0.000095373325,0.025591996,0.000028983914,0.0000066834314,0.000007276423,0.9582077,0.00002230356,0.00017117463,0.0017482061,0.01350221,0.00013424578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019276602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043446096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14156818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015072814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039066616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69302505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1836543710","doi":"10.3386/w10138","title":"Regeneration, Labour Supply and the Welfare Costs of Taxes","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Regeneration (biology); Welfare; Business; Labour economics; Labour supply; Natural resource economics; Economics; Public economics; Market economy; Biology","score_opus":0.17077967866454866,"score_gpt":0.4636319316505977,"score_spread":0.292852252986049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1836543710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028667642,0.004311664,0.000011263308,0.008601321,0.0008980902,0.0010337644,0.00086274906,0.000009944324,0.95560354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.942237,0.018827219,0.00017123722,0.000040601724,0.0006556651,0.00006387704,0.00023559801,0.000022539252,0.037746266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963704,0.00073489186,0.0005660298,0.00031847987,0.0017075601,0.00030268077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947829,0.0009487777,0.00034602784,0.00022637464,0.0036095374,0.00008636211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011272571,0.00013215524,0.00038889344,0.00033698737,0.0005452338,0.00008586584,0.00044661647,0.00035388808,0.000341441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026946897,0.00010924425,0.00010615667,0.00024240218,0.0014351272,0.00011493436,0.00007941057,0.00040414647,0.000009032816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020505282,0.000022698305,0.00425124,0.000050577873,0.000078144185,4.3523545e-7,0.00078393315,0.0000917083,0.000007694116,0.96275985,0.03152765,0.00040554555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016239047,0.00007769508,0.010923853,0.0001104203,0.000038445203,0.000008525358,0.008638375,0.00020617276,0.000056434154,0.5416545,0.43630025,0.00036137033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026721455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012668099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9178573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009648971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005734363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1839284494","doi":"10.25336/p6hs43","title":"Early life transitions of Canadian youth: effects of family transformation and community characteristics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Transition (genetics); American Community Survey; Demography; Life course approach; Set (abstract data type); Demographic economics; Psychology; Geography; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Population; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.06004204300571237,"score_gpt":0.2905724434372818,"score_spread":0.23053040043156942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1839284494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942184,0.00032629774,0.000036398324,0.00008093451,0.00027202026,0.00026902484,0.00017354492,0.000005450824,0.0046179327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924433,0.0005186085,0.00005974741,0.00009148318,0.0000132656705,0.0000058326177,0.000053263768,0.0000056354584,0.000007845625],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989751,0.00036776063,0.00026334942,0.000065627806,0.00010893206,0.00021924586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993822,0.00009782737,0.000065385495,0.00009316698,0.00013235677,0.00022905675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048530736,0.00007571399,0.00019559516,0.0005013318,0.00049551355,0.000009147549,0.0000614133,0.00009388213,0.0000012946077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045066257,0.00008969014,0.000024117484,0.0005412114,0.00019146071,0.00012828645,0.000001933878,0.00013560789,3.0916155e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003254337,0.00002344627,0.31471595,0.00019380567,0.000042943102,0.0000016761222,0.6455501,0.000030897205,0.000034685778,0.03849402,0.000017464645,0.0008917618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018303226,0.000027667333,0.8810522,0.000057538407,0.000028083818,1.10038314e-7,0.11766177,0.000020444388,0.0000021685264,0.0007514699,0.00013685333,0.000078671335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96620846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99438834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5663362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026262456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003694168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38111398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1846069906","doi":"10.25336/p6cd0j","title":"Changes in Economic Status and Timing of Marriage of Young Canadians","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Earnings; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Demographic economics; Panel data; Economics; Demography; Longitudinal data; Sociology","score_opus":0.04456176866536112,"score_gpt":0.31796668863735583,"score_spread":0.27340491997199473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1846069906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99365145,0.0006261936,0.0000024042179,0.00009654789,0.00034277095,0.00012515456,0.00003595193,0.0000023904283,0.0051171347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992045,0.00057275646,0.00007621023,0.000033695862,0.000038064118,0.0000021251246,0.000007827831,0.000004466294,0.000060321287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993246,0.000032572745,0.00019269224,0.000099286335,0.00005814703,0.0002926741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996812,0.000054105327,0.00006695885,0.000057067376,0.000029302197,0.000111385445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051072816,0.00005210129,0.00014748347,0.00034691085,0.0000792689,0.0000040215045,0.000044421417,0.00005792593,0.000006447084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010569559,0.00006398869,0.000009115926,0.00017367047,0.00012641639,0.000055076016,0.000008477402,0.000041587817,1.9661103e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015525743,0.0000014663124,0.95368195,0.000015054984,0.0000061415726,0.000003161211,0.038885932,0.00007092344,0.0000037359675,0.0055738315,0.000021607008,0.0017346485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010254397,0.000007400042,0.92274624,0.000023282138,0.000003719002,1.2106007e-7,0.076052904,0.00009055216,0.0000013537056,0.0007317883,0.00018350386,0.00005658163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9714693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99992007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03716697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010181603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020257915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26624537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1847338122","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720090501.001","title":"Power Relations and Contraceptive Use: Gender Differentials in Bangladesh","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Power (physics); Gender relations; Ethnology; Humanities; Gender studies; Demography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022635297505476576,"score_gpt":0.2778484065448296,"score_spread":0.255213109039353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1847338122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8162826,0.000052524043,0.00006715842,0.0013008441,0.00024274229,0.00020129618,0.000032033062,0.000021967118,0.18179888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99796027,0.000025628502,0.00008676482,0.0010296715,0.00008528227,0.0000031908419,0.0000024353353,0.0000040170835,0.0008027584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984954,0.00009223014,0.00013901103,0.00028181143,0.0003364575,0.00065511605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920446,0.000056725734,0.00004191517,0.00008161047,0.00013151274,0.00048375197],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005966616,0.000089699184,0.00012323468,0.00022052896,0.0014517419,0.00027436626,0.00024576604,0.00012830408,0.00013621178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027359294,0.00009921076,0.000027607428,0.001011836,0.001047018,0.0005523199,0.00001298735,0.00014488025,0.000012036941],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017096439,0.000018962002,0.4038411,6.3424295e-7,0.0000029734806,0.000011211299,0.077689186,0.0000012648358,0.00027716724,0.5159485,0.0008214181,0.0013858809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012942843,0.000009754889,0.96553564,0.0000031733857,0.0000035901999,2.9354763e-7,0.023248598,0.000021869213,0.0000010553501,0.00439356,0.006511761,0.00014126507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03028949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22294143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56169456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066257495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012005047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1847679129","doi":"10.1111/roiw.12112","title":"Poverty Dynamics in <scp>T</scp>urkey","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Income and Wealth","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Panel data; Poverty rate; Demographic economics; Dynamics (music); Development economics; Labour economics; Econometrics; Economic growth; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.0127199454302348,"score_gpt":0.2933848083416713,"score_spread":0.2806648629114365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1847679129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65296626,0.12183995,0.00079056335,0.0029078107,0.0006645196,0.0009828476,0.000052324474,0.000073612115,0.21972209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48222056,0.51401055,0.00041879425,0.002702019,0.00008779914,0.000006548339,0.000013511336,0.000010514982,0.0005296644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998601,0.00030017307,0.00037740738,0.00017867502,0.00025162738,0.00029107646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990973,0.00032012732,0.00017488518,0.00019239259,0.00007677136,0.00013854458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018771735,0.0001056091,0.00040856315,0.00006610206,0.00011921072,0.0000146551265,0.00019874997,0.000084411055,0.000008709876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073498196,0.00008963609,0.000061227445,0.0003824305,0.00010957006,0.00009285309,0.000046059384,0.00013353466,0.000011152784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012037665,0.000092180766,0.6621372,0.007832278,0.00001349359,0.0000016322466,0.003215924,0.0000021581975,0.000002812195,0.29821286,0.0020624637,0.02642579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008906114,0.00025070287,0.5845385,0.010162703,0.00006911703,0.000004219684,0.012594655,0.0028230161,0.0000015837912,0.016790433,0.37158644,0.00028799573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017828842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003998136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39217064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012368953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016773133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36552534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1848086556","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.00498.x","title":"How does the marriage market clear? An empirical framework","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Marriage market; Matching (statistics); Statistic; Economics; Famine; Propensity score matching; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12038267836231122,"score_gpt":0.22610777478655603,"score_spread":0.10572509642424481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1848086556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9740202,0.00016734135,0.00015213575,0.017449869,0.0030804279,0.00024167044,0.00013077757,0.000012127151,0.0047454434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99002755,0.00063123653,0.0010147643,0.0025512811,0.0024517959,0.000008213828,0.000005385543,0.000051240004,0.0032585168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975989,0.0003690126,0.00057894725,0.00035562052,0.000009548821,0.0010879904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954766,0.00039401778,0.00048094918,0.00053332566,0.00026479608,0.0028503314],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014838139,0.00027457424,0.0005049885,0.00035456923,0.0013188284,0.000415904,0.0012433445,0.00039000198,0.00049010356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007367896,0.00023532815,0.00026694563,0.00021355554,0.0008889906,0.0007640583,0.000022470193,0.00073158357,0.000010432571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010253327,0.000035938578,0.2903156,0.000019438054,0.0002451848,0.0006921285,0.068408065,0.00077185675,0.0000022962593,0.62521267,0.011263734,0.0029305986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006702239,0.00047298596,0.07653193,0.00007013227,0.000085408436,0.0006349,0.06024488,0.0014250646,0.000005385757,0.40711892,0.45175296,0.00098722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18921684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99238247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8031656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018725658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005658959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1849009696","doi":"10.25336/p6ng60","title":"Determinants of women's non-family work in Ghana and Zimbabwe","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Fertility; Work (physics); Developing country; Demographic economics; Informal sector; Economic growth; Survey data collection; Formal education; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Population; Economics; Demography","score_opus":0.034678473792609896,"score_gpt":0.30929152965039164,"score_spread":0.27461305585778173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1849009696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958619,0.00072566635,0.0000017231245,0.000024439329,0.00037588915,0.00015633846,0.0000037377968,0.0000038106245,0.0028465227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928653,0.00027494825,0.00016889017,0.000102634425,0.000020746924,0.000014739879,0.0000014944906,0.0000057626503,0.00012425787],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905324,0.00009325303,0.00021392987,0.00014495173,0.00011054765,0.00038405537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996396,0.000050430837,0.00005341495,0.00008119608,0.000045132863,0.00013026535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005834628,0.00007478636,0.00019504305,0.00023119872,0.0001414741,0.000009388431,0.000059963506,0.000077397795,0.0000033180831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003323541,0.000083770705,0.000012323895,0.00057145406,0.00014017444,0.00008177512,0.000009145577,0.0000600822,9.59314e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020745788,0.000005026041,0.9536741,0.000011366987,0.0000038116564,0.0000061582296,0.043112483,0.000019137688,5.906737e-7,0.0016628839,0.000031073305,0.0014712872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016455184,0.000009464539,0.9004879,0.000038653798,0.0000023728182,1.2490567e-7,0.09745806,0.000024100114,2.9685194e-7,0.0013888237,0.00034345494,0.00008219587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17662196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8902301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71360815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093724235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017339307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.828861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W18500272","doi":"","title":"Unemployment, Gender and Labor Force Participation in Spain: Future Trends in Labor Market","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Economics; Recession; Quarter (Canadian coin); Business cycle; Labour economics; Unemployment rate; Discouraged worker; Percentage point; Demographic economics; Beveridge curve; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.033716026198312765,"score_gpt":0.2837358013950114,"score_spread":0.25001977519669866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W18500272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903885,0.00017427413,0.00005787079,0.0006464774,0.0005268663,0.00006397006,0.000006488718,0.000010990501,0.008124528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979866,0.00009458377,0.0008032645,0.00015103906,0.0006998728,0.000002480793,0.0000016993516,0.000020384485,0.00024005346],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856687,0.00023533373,0.00056048366,0.0001655683,0.000105753774,0.0003660121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921405,0.0001390735,0.00037661256,0.00008343234,0.000047287678,0.00013951851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019978448,0.00012351936,0.00026750247,0.00032159174,0.00010444533,0.00007907994,0.00015567067,0.00010301676,0.000091383765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012566178,0.00012636406,0.000050573475,0.00022041755,0.00006138228,0.00038292108,0.000024789884,0.00019838601,0.0000014797829],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036409067,0.000032596803,0.958437,0.000014745063,0.000016660832,0.000012498653,0.01466227,0.0013678722,0.000010013724,0.011539731,0.00019634023,0.013673846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011163423,0.00010634069,0.9416043,0.00005714418,0.000015858506,0.0000112444595,0.012018434,0.038691573,0.0000019120707,0.0032878157,0.0029063926,0.00018261862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014672469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00736617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037323702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024198517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010363937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51529765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1857457866","doi":"10.7202/010050ar","title":"L’évolution de la situation économique des familles avec enfants au Canada et au Québec depuis 15 ans","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Poverty; Economic inequality; Demographic economics; Economics; Family income; Income distribution; Affect (linguistics); Welfare economics; Household income; Inequality; Geography; Economic growth; Sociology","score_opus":0.010408004977158774,"score_gpt":0.23582664107901283,"score_spread":0.22541863610185406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1857457866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96896887,0.004952077,0.0068048225,0.0018073836,0.0016092333,0.0003825179,0.0001797774,0.000119604614,0.0151757365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98758787,0.007386328,0.00143093,0.0019749799,0.00070683996,0.00005403842,0.000058949816,0.000068281566,0.0007317923],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99604046,0.00094745244,0.00054698373,0.00062531483,0.0003712321,0.0014685809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976598,0.0007199156,0.00022729507,0.00039853997,0.00022205946,0.00077241217],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014339428,0.0004979445,0.00044549542,0.0003595046,0.0016854753,0.00013270623,0.00052525295,0.00091017043,0.000022736967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007108438,0.0005995202,0.0003207976,0.0015360285,0.005024661,0.00046306898,0.000041461448,0.0007223342,0.000010331679],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026445936,0.00017353639,0.68977666,0.00010190369,0.00020326764,0.00007669261,0.17980346,0.0045348504,0.00019331787,0.11559058,0.0004654408,0.009053875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009071711,0.00011044859,0.89392805,0.0001743338,0.00023008944,0.00003956179,0.06496916,0.00037902774,0.0000677974,0.020930955,0.01744141,0.0008219685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20415144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017197784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046815943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1882077733","doi":"10.3233/jem-150414","title":"Measuring time use in household surveys","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic and Social Measurement","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Economics","score_opus":0.24461691788575257,"score_gpt":0.28124446465135244,"score_spread":0.03662754676559987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1882077733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99519086,0.0002486702,0.00016620538,0.00045053332,0.0006417097,0.00008679462,0.0000045358524,0.000007928998,0.0032027683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905515,0.00011290872,0.00010917794,0.000081283106,0.0004864081,9.169057e-7,3.1206756e-7,0.000009518818,0.0001443181],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983639,0.0005099291,0.00040411195,0.00010114292,0.00038825144,0.00023265813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992926,0.000043671458,0.00024708273,0.000049023674,0.00020318829,0.00016439856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009028814,0.00008893688,0.00026840132,0.00010453804,0.00016160222,0.00011573398,0.00014041614,0.00009307309,0.000008908665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018140217,0.000089915105,0.000071326605,0.00005218368,0.00009166274,0.00036415798,0.000020865316,0.00015494053,0.000008028648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078666344,0.00020987289,0.9210116,0.000015107288,0.00016936543,0.000026256743,0.06355852,0.0010160486,0.0002079681,0.0059170127,0.0044828034,0.0033067495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037168278,0.00018952464,0.9332864,0.0000704647,0.00007462261,0.000007725791,0.038439956,0.00028199633,0.000016421702,0.0059774523,0.017413972,0.00052457815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001580404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006552977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025118561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009831726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006992658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36666316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1883522681","doi":"","title":"Marriage, Motherhood and Masculinity in the Global Economy: Reconfigurations of Personal and Economic Life","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Injustice; Earnings; Unpaid work; Globalization; Masculinity; Ideology; Power (physics); Resistance (ecology); Work (physics); Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Economics; Market economy; Politics","score_opus":0.05246366483339995,"score_gpt":0.3751540418891554,"score_spread":0.32269037705575543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1883522681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634471,0.00033191423,0.00001809533,0.008243564,0.00015150242,0.00051185745,0.00039176826,0.000006346381,0.026897835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948449,0.0034722404,0.00071081484,0.00062526925,0.00027850148,0.0000074300897,0.000005236978,0.000011572493,0.00004402117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948471,0.0002598884,0.0012856692,0.00094279717,0.0003034124,0.0023611079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99398273,0.0015811431,0.00027774822,0.00042506697,0.00038999255,0.0033433246],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015899207,0.0002863864,0.00071748527,0.00064268295,0.0008049404,0.0005406737,0.0010021747,0.00024359897,0.00009800968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029086312,0.00025275585,0.00010789593,0.00063456304,0.013494132,0.0012093353,0.0004445532,0.00056451414,0.0000062769877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047437425,0.00010388529,0.15841287,0.000030499166,0.000013162544,9.210637e-7,0.00045984678,0.000016782868,0.00003086372,0.84031785,0.0000100434845,0.00055585627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013594549,0.00045753602,0.6647408,0.000044093755,0.000027889568,0.000022362758,0.024351418,0.00946581,0.00009479072,0.29738948,0.0016258846,0.00042049697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018213946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01344247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54292834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000830257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055685933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1885669740","doi":"10.25336/p68d0m","title":"Family Models for Earning andCaring: Implications for Child Care and for Family Policy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Preference; Toddler; Work (physics); Diversity (politics); Paid work; Child care; Psychology; Demographic economics; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Labour economics; Economics; Sociology; Medicine; Nursing; Working hours","score_opus":0.08930677168978307,"score_gpt":0.37592281546187767,"score_spread":0.2866160437720946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1885669740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587702,0.007980443,0.013156734,0.0048590307,0.0005470005,0.00385581,0.00075461686,0.000074324744,0.010001803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952283,0.00040142663,0.0027946336,0.0008164942,0.0003058346,0.00023588097,0.00013171615,0.000012510556,0.00007323938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990891,0.000019663936,0.00018979187,0.00024000504,0.000059693582,0.00040174337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934816,0.000101205114,0.000060258524,0.00010272411,0.0002503586,0.00013726513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020527793,0.00010470623,0.00017351212,0.00022520243,0.00122784,0.000040298393,0.00009123423,0.00009965109,5.9178568e-8],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031036267,0.00012058282,0.000050997256,0.0002343257,0.000062915875,0.00011588091,0.000007997398,0.00004630582,7.159442e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001749426,0.000011777749,0.15111586,0.000094281466,0.000041251253,1.5222437e-7,0.061164882,0.006109385,0.00001533843,0.7307598,0.0010017989,0.049667988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005895746,0.00008334438,0.8282059,0.00003655621,0.000030182304,1.916511e-7,0.0524808,0.0036966926,1.729419e-7,0.10751442,0.0071484637,0.00021369301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06505222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4509342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67709005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062366517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023204519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94436765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1889526931","doi":"","title":"Fertility Transition and Female Rational Choices in Egypt","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World health & population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Wife; Economics; Probit model; Developing country; Demographic transition; Demographic economics; Demography; Population; Economic growth; Sociology; Political science; Econometrics","score_opus":0.03757542105535243,"score_gpt":0.3445023979239029,"score_spread":0.30692697686855047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1889526931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911214,0.00022581832,0.00101745,0.006200063,0.00019096813,0.00031858886,0.0000069757607,0.000040964933,0.0008777823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978251,0.00006915753,0.00086706545,0.00090952305,0.00008972268,0.0000105195095,0.00009328237,0.000004766138,0.0001309014],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898845,0.00014010734,0.0002524274,0.00017759913,0.00022075513,0.00022065036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970347,0.000029505392,0.00007470602,0.00006397867,0.00003390503,0.00009444903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065170956,0.000064405736,0.00011060282,0.000116756404,0.00041905555,0.000031820127,0.00003974554,0.000049955765,0.000016978662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026628264,0.000071959745,0.000018462928,0.00036096704,0.000045394234,0.00026199786,0.0000044409016,0.000095976786,0.0000032793107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018161361,0.00007351002,0.89611197,0.000045111297,0.00000181375,4.5082965e-7,0.02898708,0.0022774697,0.000008325644,0.06876725,0.000012312222,0.003696529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032939448,0.00001406322,0.983783,0.0000245435,0.000001647182,8.036738e-8,0.001632567,0.00039378565,4.8611616e-7,0.013159319,0.00059671956,0.00006437472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033863205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35819307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32432985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034324595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018486177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97257036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893874227","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01669.x","title":"Viewpoint: Empirical evidence and tax policy design: lessons from the <i>Mirrlees Review</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Public economics; Economics; Tax reform; Earnings; Tax credit; Empirical evidence; Key (lock); Value-added tax; Macroeconomics; Accounting; Computer science","score_opus":0.41172314982671115,"score_gpt":0.28186992587241755,"score_spread":0.1298532239542936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893874227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91320133,0.015906487,0.00023108633,0.06712024,0.0009837366,0.00044684557,0.00019455457,0.000007918731,0.0019078123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242819,0.05053439,0.0015481933,0.021834234,0.0013452211,0.000018899333,0.000004157629,0.000043598342,0.00038940334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976539,0.0004378024,0.0007519395,0.00034354147,0.0000076767565,0.0008051611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604005,0.00068600033,0.0005725666,0.00041313135,0.0002423918,0.002045863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021834734,0.0002551424,0.00057663914,0.00023036051,0.0006184613,0.00015239723,0.0010124999,0.00019884169,0.00025140488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001494865,0.00023908883,0.00019046638,0.00022852613,0.0006558408,0.00055899925,0.000034161494,0.00043023744,0.00001916397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005495173,0.000028094535,0.088841796,0.00010190299,0.00030040974,0.00020047714,0.07695444,0.00014773155,0.0000065678487,0.8026593,0.020501846,0.0102025345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070266216,0.00042910923,0.06940172,0.002272844,0.00034210013,0.00030869257,0.015751963,0.0003202376,0.0000165869,0.6767922,0.23246875,0.0011931567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71794224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.275525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014325408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00787115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1898642510","doi":"10.1111/caje.12121","title":"Social network structure and status competition","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation","keywords":"Centrality; Competition (biology); Microeconomics; Index (typography); Economics; Consumption (sociology); Externality; Measure (data warehouse); Social network (sociolinguistics); Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Ecology; Data mining","score_opus":0.09998836518137097,"score_gpt":0.21270559740057093,"score_spread":0.11271723221919996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1898642510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99191,0.00034564539,0.000041988922,0.0020893987,0.0019060156,0.00013859193,0.00016630726,0.000006375563,0.00339571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99603665,0.00017630041,0.00046248702,0.0006512221,0.0023889197,0.0000016894652,0.000019603103,0.000025836667,0.000237321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983492,0.00013125314,0.0004449503,0.00020259457,0.0000049957266,0.00086703995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964185,0.000064756,0.00036806634,0.000120770084,0.0002908266,0.0027370872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074373966,0.00017124848,0.00038183498,0.00023890573,0.00050893886,0.00020508055,0.00028161585,0.00023183794,0.000077981866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015462,0.00021582756,0.000085194755,0.00012829294,0.00036395315,0.00038078317,0.000013509717,0.0003000577,0.0000038243934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020346777,0.0000030377237,0.07671691,0.0000079546535,0.000057420388,0.000040558767,0.020095954,0.0029267378,9.125727e-7,0.8969969,0.0020995184,0.0010337253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010227655,0.00020275993,0.025095293,0.00003436225,0.000057456633,0.000110910994,0.021361621,0.0005697949,0.000001343941,0.75520355,0.19583045,0.0005097279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2942285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99590516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70167667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022201224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056886636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1899996688","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.01499.x","title":"Why is the rate of single‐parenthood lower in Canada than in the U.S.? A dynamic equilibrium analysis of welfare policies","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Welfare; Single mothers; Economics; Human capital; Investment (military); Overlapping generations model; Fertility; Single parent; Labour economics; General equilibrium theory; Demographic economics; Welfare system; Microeconomics; Population; Economic growth; Psychology; Demography; Political science; Sociology; Market economy","score_opus":0.05820791332656533,"score_gpt":0.20717865653264783,"score_spread":0.1489707432060825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1899996688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97160506,0.0002690927,0.000004988758,0.025899718,0.0004888551,0.0002270483,0.00036480193,0.0000012035503,0.0011392594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639326,0.00013695765,0.00001995562,0.0033088769,0.000075251846,0.0000034222473,0.000009155411,0.000014231856,0.000038913633],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975835,0.00032051755,0.0010737133,0.00023256193,0.000013577485,0.0007761185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977697,0.00026664295,0.0007910049,0.0004383746,0.00020091257,0.000533339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014420766,0.0002193239,0.00074208016,0.0009905883,0.0001507542,0.000077876335,0.0012035487,0.00012821864,0.00007810978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021232004,0.00019388214,0.00028401212,0.00106348,0.00027808457,0.00024608435,0.0000140489265,0.0003172015,2.5715906e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012063226,0.00010807257,0.5366002,0.000044315715,0.0009238294,0.00022521289,0.12324521,0.09291468,0.0000809788,0.24322218,0.0010844597,0.0014302714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000943761,0.0004033313,0.7949296,0.00013730947,0.0004472123,0.000030022025,0.14751671,0.00829113,0.000024188505,0.036302183,0.010310807,0.0006636939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9970139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25832948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037498488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074774944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1901489110","doi":"10.1111/labr.12057","title":"The Motherhood Wage Penalty and Its Determinants: A Public–Private Comparison","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Public sector; Private sector; Labour economics; Economics; Control (management); Economic growth; Management","score_opus":0.05585602638829274,"score_gpt":0.3203539624287174,"score_spread":0.26449793604042465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1901489110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847747,0.0010331568,0.00005342122,0.0021991548,0.00042524078,0.00016620639,0.000016108554,0.000064121035,0.011267898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949313,0.00038961682,0.000116275354,0.00038499158,0.00016958393,0.00000876773,0.0000011652016,0.0000120134455,0.003986294],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987201,0.00019835499,0.0001691338,0.00017565828,0.00032394874,0.00041280987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992455,0.0000895519,0.00008502045,0.00017800252,0.00015498739,0.00024691006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096779515,0.000100866055,0.00014287463,0.00002578209,0.0006589236,0.00028280122,0.000353503,0.00008740986,0.000012914517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034194256,0.00007197137,0.000027316906,0.00022601565,0.0001347352,0.00020101681,0.00008113042,0.0001279814,0.00004940585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019013,0.00012065683,0.5246261,0.000016458505,0.000037636644,0.000015070358,0.046476744,0.0000066474768,0.00008322921,0.4141943,0.0027914399,0.011612731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011757343,0.00011387157,0.27474397,0.000020070838,0.000024547766,0.0000051638654,0.07928639,0.0037146844,0.000052178497,0.022087673,0.61832327,0.00045247853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005423805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055371397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6155318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049994505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015747819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50679743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1908420438","doi":"10.3917/rfas.021.0043","title":"Les disparités de l'aide sociale entre États aux États-Unis","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue française des affaires sociales","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation; Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08298592981348121,"score_gpt":0.29468852371324306,"score_spread":0.21170259389976184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1908420438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8198861,0.109102614,0.00061178335,0.01698472,0.0036623734,0.0006879043,0.0004956843,0.00044835868,0.048120487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9199185,0.03729858,0.0026042445,0.00047097026,0.0038157501,0.000057896697,0.000046189318,0.00015625951,0.03563165],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942093,0.0010226568,0.000869498,0.00092368136,0.0008081846,0.0021667168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706525,0.0008146494,0.00043396832,0.0005144309,0.00045829368,0.0007134177],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007033636,0.0007714074,0.0009946108,0.00018309402,0.006735658,0.00040491423,0.0010380398,0.0010919119,0.0024690425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007168583,0.0009523266,0.0008723546,0.0013807316,0.008295601,0.00072482985,0.00020577511,0.00081905647,0.00068831514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026632559,0.0011500661,0.15851255,0.001103454,0.00043747053,0.00029330875,0.30576724,0.0001702047,0.00015137516,0.25661546,0.03516199,0.24061026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021739833,0.00026768778,0.11318322,0.0015648628,0.0011475809,0.0000509585,0.16241871,0.0051447963,0.00004740172,0.14061315,0.5702209,0.0031667254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04040118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0851206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5350589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014316133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010060742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916555074","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1024","title":"Child Welfare Reform: Protecting Children or Policing the Poor","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare reform; Welfare; Criminology; Political science; Business; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.019937664605730133,"score_gpt":0.30695125472935064,"score_spread":0.2870135901236205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1916555074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85802555,0.00007214394,0.000033944496,0.07904497,0.00019213244,0.00021734151,0.000010475716,0.000023101395,0.062380325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911327,0.00013898284,0.00009205362,0.0033978669,0.005102706,0.0000014442157,5.8228557e-7,0.0000130946155,0.00012059707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874675,0.00014375796,0.0003021578,0.00008724673,0.00036070976,0.00035934855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938494,0.00001615457,0.00029545094,0.00006062026,0.00012920988,0.00011364441],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008498532,0.00011085778,0.00020942501,0.00007522781,0.004229182,0.00015366636,0.00026064675,0.00013035125,0.000005995092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011408676,0.00006729849,0.00012406688,0.00026159908,0.00033200718,0.00023823793,0.000042612082,0.00046522927,0.000001320829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032910033,0.000046142246,0.00073041907,0.000009609153,0.000072850875,0.000005828114,0.11557825,0.000010110576,0.000019302026,0.8807556,0.000031100655,0.0027078928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057908082,0.00077368785,0.53291833,0.00025247544,0.0002623076,0.0005865434,0.3261018,0.0000070325686,0.00009720871,0.070882566,0.061294537,0.0010327307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1174939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013879685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80987304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031017885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035398803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99706715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1923522862","doi":"10.1111/1475-5890.12085","title":"Childcare Assistance: Are Subsidies or Tax Credits Better?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fiscal Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"Australian Government; Department of Human Services, State Government of Victoria","keywords":"Subsidy; Economics; Tax credit; Labour economics; Welfare; Proxy (statistics); Constraint (computer-aided design); Government (linguistics); Public economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.0910325769768826,"score_gpt":0.3359740410751076,"score_spread":0.24494146409822498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1923522862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93853474,0.011728735,0.00008560672,0.011823267,0.0034587209,0.0003303142,0.00019552995,0.00028786028,0.033555225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98572767,0.0017496285,0.000414658,0.0007863201,0.0016526821,0.000043047166,0.0000101511705,0.000018820261,0.009597004],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982399,0.00013887571,0.00021600697,0.00030647413,0.0006089818,0.0004898122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900824,0.00014686007,0.000113216396,0.00018041134,0.0003602855,0.00019096523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038898378,0.00019160518,0.00035352443,0.000042349686,0.0008076259,0.000080549995,0.0002883044,0.00011736632,0.000022568165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009703927,0.00014158248,0.00007782686,0.00034299353,0.0005005166,0.00017399163,0.00014529783,0.00015642107,0.00006551569],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004060081,0.00006297817,0.65648174,0.00003836326,0.00017486745,0.00004120126,0.07839479,0.000007915384,0.0000019764911,0.0014094857,0.2618534,0.0014927009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043972654,0.00007708428,0.51733404,0.000062246654,0.000045475455,0.000001033521,0.31864515,0.000007740277,0.0000053415065,0.003619214,0.15944624,0.00031671126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029845285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019459618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24025036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002020602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010275373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1925539229","doi":"10.25336/p6f88t","title":"Family Disruption in Canada: Impact of the Changing Patterns of Family Formation and of Female Employment","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Labour economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.048186546787094796,"score_gpt":0.3185865494452751,"score_spread":0.2704000026581803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1925539229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99887174,0.00034324065,0.000004150111,0.00003800746,0.00011640381,0.00022411563,0.00007858696,0.0000013275767,0.00032240874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99941164,0.00049739686,0.0000073477036,0.000028763505,0.0000124030585,0.000005444377,0.000009133596,0.0000034281643,0.000024422507],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922,0.00007504487,0.00027614203,0.00007434545,0.00016681747,0.00018765876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969614,0.000024195233,0.00010596096,0.00008024633,0.00005297919,0.00004048456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023988269,0.000060162707,0.00015517187,0.000151237,0.000088894085,0.000002848182,0.000064718544,0.000033555698,0.0000035242947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029968294,0.000051747516,0.000025612831,0.00034887716,0.000051423736,0.00010409,0.000010810101,0.00003956879,5.0564722e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002576709,0.0000040212435,0.967871,0.000024306488,0.000008147431,3.682898e-7,0.026355485,0.001538867,0.000019989893,0.00022100458,0.000007112566,0.003947134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119966375,0.000010863706,0.9557287,0.000079912206,0.000005563314,9.331537e-8,0.043314714,0.00055917416,0.0000026960097,0.000121061865,0.0000123135105,0.00004491817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01695923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001448518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040578708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37878242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926365800","doi":"","title":"Socio-Economic Outcomes of Teen Pregnancy and Parenthood: A Review of the Literature.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Disadvantaged; Disadvantage; Psychology; Pregnancy; Developmental psychology; Teen pregnancy; Population; Demography; Sociology; Political science; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.06898514863636453,"score_gpt":0.3643983408875789,"score_spread":0.2954131922512144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1926365800","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012496612,0.9943652,2.042972e-7,0.00043319105,0.00038871545,0.00052590895,0.0003903155,0.0000022334775,0.0026445705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025569876,0.99630535,0.000008474084,0.00017198993,0.00016828197,0.000004300549,0.000009083622,0.000017515576,0.0007580207],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965169,0.001468749,0.0012307641,0.00015994185,0.00031483435,0.00030883122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971356,0.00020552197,0.0017083657,0.00049156335,0.00018016012,0.00027883504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023890513,0.00025182927,0.0015863667,0.00012330012,0.00059375464,0.00007868609,0.0011820777,0.00021748742,0.0001593738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016290469,0.00013880359,0.0005648288,0.00023777773,0.0008300315,0.00010090875,0.000034375833,0.0005743904,0.0000018441175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000461128,0.00013142242,0.03492643,0.13000347,0.0022529888,0.000040701885,0.1222619,0.0000017350386,1.19127144e-7,0.044082496,0.01078263,0.6555115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017363233,0.0000562995,0.007014936,0.09591373,0.0013125829,0.000025923991,0.0023935856,6.080712e-8,3.3298242e-8,0.0041706935,0.8886176,0.00032097247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015360727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13235818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8778349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034787308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004571321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1927651636","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2014004","title":"The Income Management Strategies of Older Couples in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Allocative efficiency; Demographic economics; Educational attainment; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.010406350939924428,"score_gpt":0.23338169791166485,"score_spread":0.22297534697174043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1927651636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9680321,0.0022172413,0.00053850433,0.00019064969,0.00031040527,0.00011544426,0.0000015015573,0.0000050371955,0.028589075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98285633,0.01625068,0.000033255314,0.000019866973,0.000040989187,0.0000025871125,3.1499593e-7,0.000005701242,0.00079025317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980638,0.00009568463,0.00021722131,0.00007879834,0.0003265867,0.0012179067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996526,0.000038528065,0.00010913015,0.0000964502,0.000058031528,0.00004525976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014099797,0.00007024944,0.000095153264,0.00004318369,0.00031668277,0.000032901393,0.00039889998,0.000029014787,0.000016550286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010646532,0.00005159312,0.000031881038,0.0001998365,0.00009957468,0.000109668894,0.000023762206,0.00047781505,0.0000010621519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008115519,0.000017428216,0.12431886,0.000003902616,0.00005642202,0.0000050333897,0.0036675036,0.000035918674,0.0000022402012,0.86890626,0.000019543955,0.0029587506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021268975,0.000029911913,0.21327762,0.000011392334,0.000011158468,0.000004013664,0.5029021,0.000040673178,0.0000015244794,0.28300834,0.00042652024,0.00007404045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82498866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99793094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5858979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001373288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009831635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934533906","doi":"10.25336/p6z614","title":"Demographic Relationships at the Macro Level","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Macro; Census; Macro level; Regression analysis; Econometrics; Regression; Population; Fertility; Focus (optics); Statistics; Geography; Demography; Mathematics; Sociology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.17304616852128682,"score_gpt":0.33136350021901856,"score_spread":0.15831733169773174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1934533906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865535,0.0015759079,0.000014561565,0.0015708474,0.0006588878,0.00020428967,0.000022528367,0.000020402527,0.009379067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958755,0.00094543723,0.000082486724,0.00029692127,0.00011490562,0.000017297469,0.000024924724,0.000007243801,0.0026352932],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899274,0.00020252167,0.00017109001,0.00014592236,0.00018275251,0.00030496813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947125,0.00014534284,0.000047410325,0.00014262252,0.000082432896,0.000110971174],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052282854,0.00007521042,0.000097377575,0.00016140316,0.0026254128,0.0000109826,0.00011878191,0.00008722345,0.000016703165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004599316,0.00006607739,0.000034871417,0.00065409456,0.00038287928,0.00009392933,0.00001981387,0.00014018372,0.000019575766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.121682e-7,0.0000021753858,0.9589393,0.000001859312,0.000010282078,0.000005941158,0.024760976,0.00013392935,2.5833094e-7,0.012880515,0.0030342902,0.0002296711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007478302,0.0000027449419,0.9700074,0.000006585355,0.000006383603,0.0000018897498,0.016841857,0.00005345719,6.169449e-8,0.004040104,0.0088813435,0.000083343024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32514817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6647466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008190417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001646087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1944648086","doi":"10.14288/1.0052282","title":"Economic and social status in household decision making : evidence from extended family mobility","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Economics; Affect (linguistics); Utility maximization; Unit (ring theory); Microeconomics; Public economics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.03444421280495734,"score_gpt":0.29322566758182766,"score_spread":0.2587814547768703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1944648086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886098,0.007937656,0.0020703766,0.000278622,0.00032979637,0.0001377175,0.00001306233,0.000031533506,0.00059145363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96873647,0.030449793,0.00025558088,0.00010723305,0.00034055763,0.0000035187072,7.669168e-7,0.000016310878,0.00008979898],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966676,0.00027898932,0.00036893645,0.0003342902,0.00032243654,0.0020276962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992567,0.00031601512,0.00015972565,0.00013076137,0.00003796948,0.00009884699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022030768,0.00015400028,0.00023475793,0.00011764362,0.00064007833,0.0001793144,0.00030643074,0.00015982283,0.000051154126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013117047,0.00015836803,0.0000817653,0.00015472356,0.00017018203,0.000503474,0.00005468722,0.0011536363,0.000013726292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020478692,0.0002648582,0.63013524,0.000008523705,0.00009328747,0.000021287631,0.053079143,0.0004708114,0.0003470864,0.050093416,0.00026719246,0.26501435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008067801,0.00010693672,0.6339114,0.000060363567,0.000027188125,0.000009332375,0.04854623,0.0015930764,9.2973016e-7,0.31402367,0.00060010713,0.00031401005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036182504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07343551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26470035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027213404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001274775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94347185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945328068","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5876.2011.00536.x","title":"INTER-TEMPORAL LABOUR FORCE PARTICIPATION AMONG MARRIED WOMEN IN JAPAN*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Economics; Probit model; Ordered probit; Probit; Econometrics; Variety (cybernetics); Demographic economics; Instrumental variable; Order (exchange); Variable (mathematics); Term (time); Labour economics; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.043260919191388705,"score_gpt":0.29921017143341416,"score_spread":0.25594925224202547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1945328068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96360713,0.0020296203,0.000005444174,0.00016638845,0.00045814674,0.00059005147,0.00000864677,0.000049017606,0.03308555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827901,0.010838984,0.000055203134,0.0006281777,0.000119849945,0.0002127167,0.000011473844,0.000018744744,0.0053247525],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810845,0.00030003727,0.0006023199,0.00031870103,0.00009302775,0.0005774913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991258,0.000051698098,0.00023822974,0.0003159412,0.00003667906,0.00023168506],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020550904,0.00016530916,0.00046956693,0.000074257274,0.000110477224,0.00004269072,0.00035421056,0.00010889984,0.0015396974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015766177,0.00016405701,0.00009675758,0.00018196373,0.00014962455,0.00043091225,0.00005405858,0.00013363009,0.0003966353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000144352825,0.000080644255,0.87515324,0.00056752114,0.000032230866,0.0000047736366,0.11000782,0.000005094895,0.0000031524974,0.007972743,0.0007041509,0.005454193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061778555,0.000089668654,0.92241025,0.0008202645,0.000039335864,0.0000013316799,0.033587255,0.00029743512,0.0000024125948,0.0054387148,0.036058504,0.00063702697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00737648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012081198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07642057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053080777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017215282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945816828","doi":"","title":"Le congé parental et son impact sur la santé des mères québécoises","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archipelago (Université du Québec à Montréal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.007883669966108219,"score_gpt":0.21786118526732687,"score_spread":0.20997751530121864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1945816828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9442983,0.012564797,0.001782519,0.0037706413,0.0005821432,0.0002589332,0.00014135617,0.00017451485,0.03642678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906884,0.005637309,0.00037143703,0.00040978446,0.00028747626,0.0000035539554,0.000032396103,0.00006237051,0.0025072666],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961514,0.0013818968,0.00031904157,0.00061286264,0.0005329302,0.001001852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970249,0.00148469,0.00024190407,0.0004569213,0.00018687556,0.0006047432],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007960265,0.0004954298,0.00055569527,0.00020138493,0.0015187685,0.00016987565,0.0007977051,0.00030250807,0.00035993344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030108145,0.0005426557,0.0004991179,0.00055681873,0.0020694837,0.0010174906,0.0002983306,0.00046402568,0.00018734374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016179626,0.0006507833,0.22789805,0.000084165804,0.00037174378,0.00014129009,0.5253244,0.0010101106,0.00019277286,0.13740653,0.0059714834,0.10078688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016006471,0.0003652202,0.6714997,0.00011696776,0.00022678425,0.000046050354,0.21842442,0.0045675137,0.000006688849,0.008041576,0.09430286,0.00080153433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9609666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9862716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4436017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006047941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023768062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1955195427","doi":"10.1111/coep.12094","title":"“COERCIVE COOPERATION”? ONTARIO'S PAY EQUITY ACT OF 1988 AND THE GENDER PAY GAP","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pay Equity; Gender pay gap; Equity (law); Economics; Wage; Public economics; Labour economics; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05995661317583345,"score_gpt":0.31315541788038204,"score_spread":0.2531988047045486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1955195427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45825124,0.00021756878,0.0003008635,0.0050244452,0.0005871529,0.0005161731,0.00005474603,0.00004509118,0.5350027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99150383,0.00021085198,0.00004711603,0.0016605067,0.00056446256,0.000016750506,0.000016188369,0.000013606153,0.005966673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857557,0.00035717624,0.00038940978,0.00026907382,0.000104038394,0.0003047583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896616,0.00027595478,0.00021765487,0.0003241513,0.00005795973,0.00015815065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014919009,0.0001589889,0.00035031675,0.000078355944,0.0003967953,0.0001141878,0.00037211494,0.00012334992,0.00009743148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016140853,0.000099225006,0.00009579029,0.00007754143,0.00077943713,0.0003381636,0.00014529318,0.00017693502,0.000034062108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007127336,0.00003605526,0.10641307,0.000016781587,0.000094792544,6.340678e-7,0.06396116,0.000046415433,0.00002244404,0.8181507,0.008137874,0.003048789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065061394,0.00015168745,0.3562116,0.000030096942,0.00007329511,0.0000046085675,0.013115898,0.0027065305,0.00005171692,0.10996968,0.5102931,0.0008856461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22569025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10639987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.708181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029079174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002420584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.909906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1960837915","doi":"10.1177/1536504215585784","title":"Stay-at-Home Fatherhoods","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contexts","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Education and Early Childhood Development","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.043819285964869684,"score_gpt":0.30799730337183256,"score_spread":0.2641780174069629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1960837915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81526285,0.00092329923,0.0003017365,0.0005049926,0.0011058423,0.0001401673,0.000012731588,0.00011827592,0.18163007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713735,0.00005767723,0.00011910832,0.00047423757,0.00026518464,0.0000067376427,0.0000047869917,0.000011749327,0.027686996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898213,0.00010969993,0.00011846693,0.00016951522,0.0003075581,0.00031264286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999315,0.00004410978,0.000043550885,0.00018540928,0.00014576185,0.00026611603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046985157,0.00008550177,0.00012225001,0.000032657867,0.00023492415,0.000048824215,0.00024305088,0.000097444405,0.00014883485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011233529,0.00008177853,0.00004603166,0.00013076962,0.00016134187,0.00011131559,0.000054061413,0.00007285556,0.0005717336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042580534,0.0002212091,0.49481624,0.0000143457455,0.00007513168,0.00004807093,0.23698476,0.000019442774,0.0003430588,0.16205679,0.059255935,0.046122454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013157935,0.0001090002,0.09692505,0.000011580613,0.00002033144,0.0000016824108,0.0391,0.00009522271,0.000024475947,0.025312055,0.8366426,0.00044220488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000591757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032518727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77738667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018025015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021696823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7348669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1961368802","doi":"10.1017/s0022050716000966","title":"Patronage Politics and the Development of the Welfare State: Confederate Pensions in the American South","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic History","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Oxford; University of Cambridge; Harvard University; Princeton University","keywords":"Ballot; Pension; Cash; Politics; Democracy; State (computer science); Political science; Welfare; Welfare state; Threatened species; Public administration; Economics; Law; Finance; Voting","score_opus":0.023324038017207276,"score_gpt":0.24129133466584926,"score_spread":0.21796729664864198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1961368802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890489,0.00029154224,0.00005383061,0.006195023,0.00037385657,0.00011582475,0.000007956182,0.0000018212711,0.003911262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984586,0.0002553342,0.00003483579,0.00048175757,0.00005903182,0.0000012162978,7.42636e-8,0.0000055951537,0.00070351304],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866873,0.00061086874,0.0003628677,0.000055124805,0.00012929691,0.00017308276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882406,0.000365314,0.00055365637,0.00016597558,0.00005048407,0.000040538856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023744113,0.00007149722,0.0001777559,0.000033639662,0.0005016473,0.000013370098,0.00048180946,0.000018626333,0.000027145505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006941251,0.00002636044,0.00005951466,0.0000311199,0.0013844203,0.000057194502,0.000044916473,0.00014845643,0.0000034536222],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015285164,0.00005071216,0.029808996,0.000008154846,0.00011780056,0.0000023515813,0.8769242,0.0001790878,0.00014370699,0.087341145,0.0025734599,0.002697491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017707221,0.000060435697,0.46068588,0.000047246333,0.00008427463,0.00001465903,0.35663286,0.00006493367,0.000008930627,0.0063728667,0.17405616,0.0002010366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000753901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00562774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5202914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004328256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080166804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5100955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965414749","doi":"10.1080/00220388.2014.947279","title":"Does Female Reservation Affect Long-Term Political Outcomes? Evidence from Rural India","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Development Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre; World Bank Group","keywords":"Reservation; Beijing; China; Human capital; Politics; Economic growth; Agriculture; Political science; State (computer science); Economics; Rural development; Development economics; Geography","score_opus":0.07185186952505841,"score_gpt":0.36393442170233004,"score_spread":0.29208255217727164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965414749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99229276,0.00059682375,0.00055674836,0.0050576613,0.0011073631,0.00011875368,0.0000012396196,0.000014599033,0.00025405074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966571,0.0012654918,0.00083592825,0.00043908152,0.00034407136,0.000002832022,8.4406884e-7,0.0000070830465,0.00044759823],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792457,0.000491201,0.00043110378,0.00008577662,0.0007096817,0.0003576899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743927,0.001677312,0.0002997751,0.0001281094,0.0003504815,0.000105068124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027077296,0.00013299676,0.00031172123,0.00006828761,0.0007243038,0.000054179,0.00043939136,0.000054851353,0.000015102708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017104353,0.000062397216,0.000067246736,0.00015698826,0.00027295956,0.00029924526,0.00012960141,0.00018712188,0.00001416442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018135332,0.000026808922,0.9431873,0.000012475859,0.00018380796,0.0000022747035,0.05501508,0.000002949379,0.00003259905,0.0009317472,0.00014662393,0.0004402239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019656606,0.000044392382,0.96017796,0.0002008665,0.000057194702,8.374306e-7,0.0370084,0.0000018320593,0.000059256912,0.0019894356,0.0001573222,0.00010590882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016612295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011483852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018006677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024615388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002493252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55708325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965824921","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12095","title":"HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTION AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Lesbian; Production (economics); Value (mathematics); Sexual orientation; Labour economics; Census; Household income; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Geography; Sociology; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.04398247597411921,"score_gpt":0.28573877122771096,"score_spread":0.24175629525359177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965824921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98954594,0.000018800705,0.000455476,0.00036123017,0.0046014464,0.00009618719,0.0000024517421,0.000058875852,0.0048596147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99553436,0.000046901183,0.00019116316,0.0001630062,0.0026690757,0.000005774642,0.000005733422,0.000007771141,0.0013762254],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994288,0.000063282074,0.00010525949,0.00021093943,0.000047723133,0.0001439671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997512,0.000024483203,0.000049498456,0.00011031207,0.000013048776,0.00005144006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051806273,0.000053570828,0.000069516085,0.00003674284,0.00024404109,0.000050555336,0.000058716298,0.000057663357,0.000018017334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006437722,0.00006034408,0.000010312358,0.00003298712,0.00018767179,0.00022552717,0.0000151869845,0.000046653582,0.000045705765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023721846,0.00006306792,0.5639987,0.00003360032,0.000036640777,6.8370593e-7,0.1891358,0.0017832506,0.0004759191,0.19600566,0.027727863,0.020715075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076506945,0.00017643157,0.68274015,0.000014112512,0.0000447134,0.0000052839387,0.14951274,0.0028434198,0.000116584306,0.015062612,0.14798678,0.000732073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044444334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010222864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18094304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008848487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005356604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.246076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966810452","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-4085.2006.00341.x","title":"Collective consumption and welfare","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Welfare; Economics; Pareto principle; Microeconomics; Set (abstract data type); Distribution (mathematics); Pareto efficiency; Mathematical economics; Welfare economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Sociology; Operations management; Market economy","score_opus":0.08152448639609139,"score_gpt":0.2000143818735436,"score_spread":0.1184898954774522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966810452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98570347,0.00037930722,0.000039554656,0.0026349935,0.0011323623,0.00019547273,0.00012904534,0.0000065872414,0.009779237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996751,0.00020550485,0.00028526416,0.0002586176,0.00062997435,0.000005223338,0.000008705948,0.000023294308,0.0018324204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985989,0.00009361525,0.00047347872,0.00022225422,0.000003263671,0.000608538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979852,0.00009343898,0.00034941107,0.00014099984,0.00022401677,0.0012069339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063667685,0.00016445086,0.00034182612,0.0004521366,0.0006716349,0.00018426272,0.00026115408,0.00019598177,0.0002080907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011330619,0.00021127041,0.00009917199,0.00011358265,0.0003937061,0.0003505413,0.000008847107,0.00022125365,0.000007611674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014421626,0.0000063629413,0.18142858,0.000011838814,0.000044239518,0.00005774682,0.006282843,0.00075467007,0.0000031814784,0.8102423,0.00053417153,0.00061966834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015417212,0.00029543476,0.24035591,0.00007743008,0.00010501942,0.0003212043,0.01956124,0.0007706102,0.000011525535,0.561397,0.17467687,0.00088605203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55019736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44771662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003525591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004900459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9219298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967320957","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2009.01211.x","title":"A Welfare Trap? The Duration and Dynamics of Social Assistance Use among Lone Mothers in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Social assistance; Art; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.02821007705001419,"score_gpt":0.24649802223071235,"score_spread":0.21828794518069816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967320957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86543787,0.04439377,0.000016686266,0.08714987,0.00064367667,0.00069232035,0.0010699176,0.000008610609,0.0005872466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96295804,0.031773463,0.00011433385,0.0045351395,0.00012489832,0.000027494869,0.00012099343,0.000023424773,0.00032220603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549246,0.0012437741,0.0010879618,0.00049711997,0.00012638602,0.0015523107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974575,0.0004789022,0.00077520596,0.00035400252,0.00032742176,0.00060699123],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022382124,0.0003780124,0.0010821652,0.00012425294,0.0005971241,0.000016090771,0.0006588855,0.00070719304,0.0000850728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011929349,0.00037653313,0.00022280983,0.00062397035,0.003502126,0.0001901784,0.000024227895,0.00077931775,6.505494e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009224449,0.000032059914,0.6437611,0.0021113493,0.0001494105,0.00009825046,0.051436316,0.000068945206,0.000008097528,0.28859022,0.0030941288,0.010640897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022361214,0.0000723439,0.8956324,0.0008179593,0.00013644191,0.000006430893,0.09341873,0.0004461232,1.7025208e-7,0.0046189837,0.0042821146,0.00034469046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98423386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99985516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28397125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010262085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008517496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968120670","doi":"10.3138/cpp.v33.1.093","title":"You've Come a Long Way, Baby? Persistent Gender Inequality in University Enrolment and Completion in Canada, 1979–2004","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Divergence (linguistics); Demography; Index (typography); Demographic economics; Convergence (economics); Gender inequality; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Economic growth; Mathematics","score_opus":0.040488756309366575,"score_gpt":0.257596261060265,"score_spread":0.21710750475089843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968120670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672381,0.00012545791,0.000050658917,0.0060253246,0.00015306019,0.00024014561,0.00015288852,0.000012719688,0.02600162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975527,0.00005710672,0.000023637747,0.0018398989,0.00009270761,0.0000012046451,0.000037989288,0.000007903728,0.0003868777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979945,0.00020110725,0.00022296162,0.0002790266,0.00031019008,0.0009922051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985243,0.000056431356,0.000058420927,0.00017726663,0.00008963955,0.0010939066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010916472,0.00013283757,0.00019360296,0.00074073044,0.00034659373,0.00006117589,0.0002684099,0.00012343311,0.000045162687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000134134,0.00016827232,0.000038946335,0.0010831098,0.00017264346,0.0001902882,0.000040611623,0.00020572994,0.0000028359439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040268924,0.000020040512,0.93297374,0.000010959322,0.000012029978,0.00008850739,0.010449279,0.000024744846,0.0000010908078,0.054497607,0.0005226764,0.0013952877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042242082,0.00000881176,0.93816787,0.000005772532,0.000003837914,0.000002351643,0.036406435,0.00016144276,9.396745e-8,0.0002417409,0.024399923,0.00017928539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054255866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013966426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015221338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99036145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969357345","doi":"10.5430/afr.v3n2p1","title":"Tax Incentive Proposals to Enhance Child Support Payment Compliance and Tax Progressivity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting and Finance Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Incentive; Public economics; Tax incentive; Child support; Public support; Tax credit; Business; Compliance (psychology); Economics; State income tax; Tax reform; Microeconomics; Finance; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.039974609964840306,"score_gpt":0.38476756478625107,"score_spread":0.34479295482141076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969357345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836584,0.000434246,0.00042677892,0.0037641285,0.0001480183,0.0007103865,0.000022391021,0.000040690764,0.010794975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941665,0.0013262942,0.0011875144,0.00022172525,0.00025011133,0.00009182325,0.0000031825748,0.0000144785645,0.0027383678],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973022,0.00028008453,0.00020889925,0.0005692309,0.0007547064,0.0008848935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893194,0.00016422094,0.0000891997,0.00025056896,0.0004313144,0.00013272445],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034826389,0.00014362736,0.00022968449,0.0000991045,0.001670428,0.00032414772,0.00031928567,0.00011222225,0.000009696376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000647924,0.00013433388,0.000024077295,0.0005849541,0.0007023421,0.0002913017,0.00027655135,0.00040805497,0.000040925483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006512845,0.0003132123,0.60633904,0.00029604087,0.00003020548,0.000016413758,0.027072338,0.000012206705,0.00065363885,0.044622615,0.006739413,0.31383976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004889325,0.0004061758,0.689954,0.0006119069,0.0000105970175,0.0000044210674,0.008254897,0.0013392747,0.00045711646,0.006498606,0.2913005,0.0006736078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001677161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013628256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31316617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007964774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001667635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969743003","doi":"10.1111/0019-8676.00173","title":"Public‐ and Private‐Sector Wage Differentials in Canada Revisited","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public sector; Economic rent; Wage; Private sector; Labour economics; Payment; Business; Government (linguistics); Variety (cybernetics); Economics; Finance; Economic growth; Market economy; Economy","score_opus":0.053654112454138966,"score_gpt":0.24690749863027747,"score_spread":0.19325338617613852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969743003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907066,0.00032073553,0.00003774508,0.0017270701,0.0001464718,0.000117907286,0.000014387517,0.0000031563834,0.006925902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766517,0.0013504117,0.0001445215,0.00019410813,0.00029258526,0.0000012856093,0.0000028145646,0.0000043214536,0.0003448064],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903893,0.00014149015,0.00041773214,0.00009984808,0.000110286936,0.00019171585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999313,0.00020938169,0.00018335247,0.00005610227,0.000068903064,0.00016924624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067853054,0.00007751816,0.00021220418,0.00004146628,0.00031587854,0.00011880604,0.00009418336,0.0001650504,0.0005059158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010571518,0.00007380881,0.00006363917,0.00019757566,0.00009871435,0.0003638583,0.000012791229,0.0003559599,7.2804767e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015442327,0.0000409536,0.9607311,0.0000042365805,0.00012102767,0.0000055589635,0.009642998,0.00006814581,0.000006005697,0.014198281,0.004358135,0.010808122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004421354,0.00009026684,0.66954696,0.00011574099,0.00011014713,0.0000151122595,0.026462529,0.00083756744,0.0000026439038,0.007533001,0.29041967,0.00044500313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08444433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15869237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29118413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003301366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014570536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92165244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969822792","doi":"10.1007/s10834-004-1415-1","title":"Cohort Perspectives on Women?s Educational Attainment and the Timing of Parenthood in Ghana","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Educational attainment; Cohort; Demographic economics; Demography; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.020821642039499006,"score_gpt":0.30126304357622985,"score_spread":0.28044140153673086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969822792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872741,0.0036294754,0.000004542602,0.0035203944,0.00015214029,0.000076001976,0.0000028839277,0.0000012267512,0.005339225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924705,0.0065513533,0.00024928286,0.00014930096,0.00033634668,0.0000026500045,2.3342186e-7,0.0000031652896,0.00023715966],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933195,0.00008478513,0.00027170527,0.00008626069,0.000096413205,0.00012886702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995159,0.0001659264,0.00018189395,0.00004969295,0.00003278132,0.000053786214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011315179,0.00006194229,0.00019892174,0.0000779687,0.00011670737,0.000035709007,0.00009359587,0.000034866232,0.000038021743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046745823,0.00004625488,0.000032798554,0.00003044105,0.00023928279,0.00014660494,0.000014492173,0.00009183701,0.000001720394],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019448342,0.00019903948,0.35491362,0.000013058043,0.00013897936,0.0000011127087,0.560969,0.0005989553,0.000023364368,0.07813058,0.00067822274,0.004139583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007872223,0.000073591684,0.44015625,0.000029353692,0.000013852035,0.0000021930248,0.55392,0.00029098295,0.000004427243,0.0028093338,0.0018414301,0.00007138549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034638649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022070887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08524262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021853407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012270467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18862192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971272404","doi":"10.1177/109114210203000505","title":"Public Provision of Indivisible Private Goods in Short Supply","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Government (linguistics); Private good; Economics; Public economics; Government expenditure; Labour economics; Business; Public finance; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.07942749459356237,"score_gpt":0.30421043115342516,"score_spread":0.2247829365598628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971272404","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37390774,0.46622968,0.0003678568,0.029954756,0.0007417307,0.0032960495,0.000057583944,0.00019606695,0.12524855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6073197,0.39119893,0.0005023885,0.00040614046,0.000038207498,0.00006400719,0.000011110119,0.000011648269,0.0004478385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976101,0.00026549608,0.0005945766,0.00035053326,0.00054212747,0.0006371752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909174,0.00006262112,0.00013905289,0.00043160655,0.00016193154,0.00011302589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019667982,0.00016466518,0.0004954254,0.00017137006,0.00016041084,0.000083649174,0.0006724192,0.00012786848,0.00027557553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008015224,0.00015213422,0.00011945474,0.0022168043,0.000190403,0.0007081607,0.000102203754,0.00021412823,0.00005116832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.36724e-7,0.00037278692,0.4218292,0.0014413638,0.000012080509,0.0000051883717,0.001961046,0.0000011168911,0.000008384762,0.18489844,0.0057407315,0.38372892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017380112,0.000046012305,0.14959739,0.0011887711,0.000012333431,0.0000013805428,0.00015275393,0.0001538691,0.0000021614007,0.0009939374,0.8474221,0.00025548055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018077558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005660311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84168136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012850686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022906307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62038535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972006922","doi":"10.1007/s11150-014-9251-z","title":"Child health and parental paid work","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Psychology; Work (physics); Paid work; National Longitudinal Surveys; Coping (psychology); Work hours; Mental health; Division of labour; Demographic economics; Developmental psychology; Domestic work; Economics; Labour economics; Working hours; Clinical psychology; Psychiatry; Wage","score_opus":0.033662338183721975,"score_gpt":0.26099295215606577,"score_spread":0.2273306139723438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972006922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85962236,0.11033236,0.000021702252,0.007365104,0.0008065555,0.00072401843,0.00006793296,0.000029673784,0.021030277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.711438,0.28549492,0.00018085472,0.00273902,0.00007358494,0.0000026381379,0.0000021192022,0.000009542007,0.000059343827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913365,0.00015876428,0.00035629407,0.00013019821,0.00005814663,0.00016297687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991551,0.000066608096,0.0003685578,0.00029888857,0.000018029434,0.000092829134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010970947,0.00007982958,0.00034747442,0.000018213292,0.00015709149,0.000010517876,0.000321978,0.00003900018,0.000005914832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109681074,0.00006269051,0.000118218064,0.00009629142,0.00019630985,0.000054990884,0.00007493662,0.00007474857,0.0000015890628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017359856,0.00025624686,0.5118331,0.007798363,0.00014377249,1.0599915e-7,0.0075752377,0.0002489158,0.0000026355572,0.38679835,0.011689553,0.07363635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087501825,0.00021285845,0.21167818,0.01386924,0.00012957114,0.000004166187,0.0035454778,0.00014965674,0.000012602057,0.011603994,0.7572326,0.0006866165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024107023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021812887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74554306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041147287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010093139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25564447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972290785","doi":"10.1080/00420980601184745","title":"Do Two-earner Households Base Their Choice of Residential Location on Both Incomes?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Pooling; Economics; Function (biology); Labour economics; Public economics; Demographic economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05785508560811741,"score_gpt":0.3376595847294497,"score_spread":0.27980449912133226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972290785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9757637,0.0029870474,0.0005528635,0.00024361025,0.0007369205,0.00020627087,0.000010971081,0.00008328672,0.019415358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968953,0.0004465753,0.00011625466,0.0002486013,0.00055697054,0.0000052831233,0.000002277965,0.000013927797,0.0017147962],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869686,0.00011691509,0.0002507488,0.00022423215,0.0004016324,0.0003095969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893874,0.00039551203,0.00013677073,0.00022656564,0.00023672056,0.0000657214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010571282,0.00012860142,0.00021815873,0.0000954144,0.00041243696,0.000026860975,0.00019444028,0.00007061843,0.0000077691675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004006019,0.000107133565,0.0000616871,0.0004526573,0.00036539408,0.00011065444,0.00006330499,0.00011005571,0.000012884771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005311868,0.0002002106,0.8468798,0.00005479,0.00020505261,0.0000066050993,0.0946961,0.00024486813,0.0002755834,0.042826924,0.011781932,0.0027750467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009272961,0.00014023164,0.8600692,0.000089378824,0.00006900923,2.7794215e-7,0.11608416,0.00004056315,0.00024992137,0.0032959448,0.018677415,0.0003566011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001949821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009673926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03953098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012245995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008261449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53982776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972459939","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2354.2006.00410.x","title":"WHY ARE FERTILITY RATES AND FEMALE EMPLOYMENT RATIOS POSITIVELY CORRELATED ACROSS O.E.C.D. COUNTRIES?*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; Total fertility rate; Unemployment; Order (exchange); Unemployment rate; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Demography; Family planning; Population; Research methodology; Macroeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.024545873762345287,"score_gpt":0.3220247974954388,"score_spread":0.2974789237330935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972459939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9520836,0.022998791,0.0009735833,0.012528835,0.0015000035,0.0011013445,0.0006687867,0.00006410007,0.00808098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94760257,0.0393126,0.0002120652,0.008223561,0.00034245194,0.00013746234,0.00021184611,0.000019511328,0.003937924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897665,0.00007092649,0.00037648293,0.00026115924,0.000120946934,0.00019385657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931175,0.00013838995,0.00021752944,0.00009724447,0.00018093588,0.00005414164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064574316,0.00011436878,0.00023226946,0.000019730265,0.00025707317,0.00015987354,0.00021621282,0.000060996153,0.00018942429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000749337,0.000115908806,0.0000769499,0.00003541554,0.0001502205,0.00022286088,0.000038500257,0.00005693034,0.00005074138],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070452224,0.0001461512,0.8707648,0.00043784565,0.000219112,0.000006220361,0.0026695237,0.00021448373,0.000027313969,0.07103337,0.051600743,0.0028100114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045367033,0.00001925453,0.4395972,0.00041697206,0.000033083503,0.0000023120845,0.00071227783,0.00061734376,0.000009672698,0.0020670525,0.555836,0.00023512704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022889927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038290154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5042353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033773924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011338726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4726624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972559425","doi":"10.1016/j.anihpc.2005.10.001","title":"An inverse problem in the economic theory of demand","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annales de l Institut Henri Poincaré C Analyse Non Linéaire","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Inverse demand function; Economics; Mathematical economics; Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics; Demand curve","score_opus":0.024401972366851682,"score_gpt":0.29613001102472464,"score_spread":0.271728038657873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972559425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96660936,0.0004448445,0.0011409611,0.00079594285,0.00009205781,0.00031386642,0.000022984535,0.00003867285,0.030541282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99549115,0.00083594624,0.0016160444,0.0013554564,0.0004066073,0.000020555684,0.000023772993,0.000014476173,0.00023602291],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978526,0.00059397024,0.00047973634,0.00032610618,0.00026840347,0.00047913764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989787,0.00013489633,0.00018861223,0.0004461251,0.00008979536,0.00016186893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025986808,0.0001968442,0.00031349983,0.0002387961,0.0003754564,0.00008587204,0.00076673506,0.00020830534,0.000054065727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060965183,0.00016365203,0.00017736183,0.00041205002,0.00061227864,0.00063326047,0.000040694315,0.0002762021,0.000051700332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011468071,0.0004908235,0.50030816,0.000080346064,0.0001913412,0.000053159765,0.22627994,0.08279291,0.00028142726,0.17397563,0.0017187446,0.013712818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002997373,0.0004931512,0.36327997,0.000249456,0.0005580484,0.000029775194,0.3874039,0.11253125,0.00024290988,0.053393424,0.077078454,0.0017422744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035545419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08630978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16112396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026888802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010202765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9303627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973625857","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2003.tb00254.x","title":"Labour Force Activity of Women in Canada: A Comparative Analysis of Aboriginal and Non‐Aboriginal Women*","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Ethnology; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Demography; Art; Population; Census","score_opus":0.030804763578613736,"score_gpt":0.3001319921507185,"score_spread":0.2693272285721048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973625857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95089,0.04306233,0.000013358833,0.0013773573,0.000586484,0.0005779735,0.001990934,0.0000048936536,0.0014966785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94802076,0.05018086,0.00017188687,0.00096614857,0.000049251077,0.0000996178,0.000035667545,0.000016856398,0.0004589819],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933369,0.0017990168,0.001076816,0.0006494159,0.0001561763,0.0029816544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952507,0.0009132827,0.0009806263,0.000464969,0.00060244446,0.0017879724],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004926527,0.00046875348,0.0030037344,0.000493334,0.00022081716,0.0000060013163,0.0006202309,0.0006003319,0.00033719244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008000031,0.0005326668,0.00029387753,0.002237457,0.0033764911,0.0001402767,0.0000220099,0.0007294233,0.0000011130816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013993132,0.000053124557,0.7510703,0.003576976,0.001306384,0.00005475127,0.12514876,0.00020490415,0.000057448666,0.11787174,0.00023080705,0.0004108178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044793385,0.00022636828,0.8002516,0.0007791548,0.00062613183,0.0000046836385,0.17944628,0.00017605444,0.000005147207,0.0037637446,0.013764128,0.0005087793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9856214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99922943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11410799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026601212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042890966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973718554","doi":"10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00169-4","title":"The retirement-consumption puzzle: a marital bargaining approach","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Economics; Consumption (sociology); Wife; Demographic economics; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Permanent income hypothesis; Panel data; Marital status; Labour economics; Sample (material); Life-cycle hypothesis; Demography; Econometrics; Population; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.0645038979635905,"score_gpt":0.2791512958189237,"score_spread":0.21464739785533316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973718554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8322071,0.0006584617,0.00268979,0.0013893063,0.0014785782,0.00013484593,0.000003885692,0.000015640177,0.16142242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99312836,0.0025668761,0.002950143,0.00016409071,0.0003489936,0.000002554222,0.0000016346878,0.000012624017,0.00082472456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985942,0.00028680282,0.00047610374,0.00011310085,0.00016597899,0.00036379253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883753,0.00016206483,0.00046561193,0.00014910704,0.00019414713,0.0001915598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004569262,0.000092131246,0.00016130522,0.00009133447,0.000790078,0.00048897637,0.00038342175,0.00010324701,0.000041861458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059653836,0.00007505585,0.00012090522,0.00011712787,0.00019745684,0.0005676032,0.000024171439,0.0002566456,0.0000093286635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006290244,0.00006847657,0.20894705,0.000004141245,0.00008518247,0.00000165647,0.0034915484,0.000101955084,0.000005233278,0.7817375,0.0011753029,0.0043756855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020271302,0.00016189273,0.08137027,0.000019372832,0.000089974266,0.00008908559,0.1207132,0.0029984107,0.000008216637,0.06031865,0.7315912,0.0006125454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022777207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003395455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73041594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003180376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005313875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6076721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973842032","doi":"10.1002/pam.20440","title":"The nonprofit advantage: Producing quality in thick and thin child care markets","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Quality (philosophy); Productivity; Profit (economics); Competitive advantage; Child care; Marketing; Economics; Nursing; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Medicine","score_opus":0.011699298713883909,"score_gpt":0.3323133128908339,"score_spread":0.32061401417694996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973842032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92995423,0.003727047,0.00046034926,0.025863498,0.00010638982,0.00026342366,0.000004054652,0.000008996748,0.03961203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97757274,0.020718629,0.00032520908,0.000697372,0.00018137394,0.0000010543816,7.920037e-7,0.0000027741921,0.0005000716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985468,0.00027630114,0.00040333282,0.00015443726,0.000382613,0.00023651667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993135,0.000066129185,0.0002752235,0.00015333762,0.00009850999,0.000093313516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002724854,0.000092966846,0.0002457356,0.00037707968,0.0005076561,0.00016491894,0.00018785645,0.00004207931,0.0000029671778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014209602,0.00006322539,0.00011225145,0.00088817975,0.00008522772,0.0001789406,0.000048251786,0.00017036537,2.5581716e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014951723,0.00020161047,0.426863,0.00016938221,0.001663941,0.000067053785,0.15567003,0.0008636977,0.000020493166,0.28029594,0.0006317754,0.13340355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026847326,0.000029677869,0.9248091,0.00002473842,0.0002800143,0.000001011906,0.06591156,0.00009538881,0.0000011462026,0.002403622,0.0060883476,0.00008691552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016990096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008231259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4979461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009884395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043014465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45932359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974132012","doi":"10.1080/13504851.2012.667545","title":"Home production and the welfare cost of labour supply tax distortions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics Letters","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Labour supply; Welfare; Production (economics); Labour economics; Production theory; Microeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.01013474282666924,"score_gpt":0.2126902031545687,"score_spread":0.20255546032789948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974132012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9782902,0.00005954326,0.00016507888,0.01783649,0.00065510033,0.00037830314,0.000046720786,0.000019536186,0.0025490366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978834,0.00028416104,0.00017975083,0.0010442017,0.00035300272,0.00005157489,0.000010552847,0.000010472496,0.00018292984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993504,0.000036217152,0.00016883646,0.00013976792,0.00005547535,0.00024927594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958605,0.000042095613,0.00011652637,0.00017022298,0.000015710712,0.00006941258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005197102,0.000079598896,0.00013669766,0.000035263056,0.00040525384,0.00003283626,0.00013263396,0.000049164788,0.000027294634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002029238,0.00007018481,0.000035534533,0.0000781491,0.0005090888,0.00014207102,0.00002999451,0.000084231215,0.0000111068875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027888958,0.000036179226,0.087290496,0.000014946555,0.000041355222,4.459654e-8,0.020108102,0.0004192839,0.00032353672,0.88956875,0.0011963667,0.0009730396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010479974,0.0000071702116,0.8144589,0.000005003601,0.00006856954,0.0000020070127,0.035458967,0.00004301355,0.000066330045,0.0036618125,0.14478056,0.00039963349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072397944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087204046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88590693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091348746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021406366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3116926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974710178","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2001.tb00978.x","title":"The Formative Years: How Parenthood Creates Gender*","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Gender relations; Sociology; Gender studies; Art","score_opus":0.06587424529811188,"score_gpt":0.2870040067957065,"score_spread":0.2211297614975946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974710178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4978842,0.4198993,0.000051002175,0.069084644,0.0031963084,0.00092386705,0.00074831635,0.00004884531,0.008163477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5942364,0.39660677,0.00017065943,0.005293144,0.00059525075,0.0001015401,0.0001196748,0.000039126622,0.0028374756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931237,0.0019750362,0.00080210494,0.00062886893,0.00014419352,0.0033261154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949052,0.0014059274,0.00066701457,0.0007517784,0.00059784297,0.001672266],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004303414,0.0005285672,0.0011140117,0.0001375636,0.0014720574,0.000058963662,0.0015637536,0.0011221967,0.00029235223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028964109,0.00049118337,0.00062897825,0.00067313435,0.0063437633,0.0002550865,0.0000928276,0.0010516933,0.00008363877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009679129,0.000065798595,0.24187008,0.0035921186,0.00091709907,0.00038422886,0.2089908,0.000018062668,0.000011371163,0.4225994,0.09042415,0.031117212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003151661,0.000200966,0.1759538,0.0015690911,0.00040304472,0.00006214823,0.27584624,0.00006247922,4.7385402e-7,0.04460918,0.5002526,0.0007248191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06808203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6113565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54327446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044873594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048816507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976492417","doi":"10.11564/23-1-315","title":"Facteurs d'Évolution de la Contribution Économique des Femmes au Niger","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"African Population Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Gender relations; Sociology; Art; Gender studies","score_opus":0.06355983661590546,"score_gpt":0.32449194237621914,"score_spread":0.26093210576031367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976492417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823914,0.0065129455,0.0017515933,0.003302414,0.0012639356,0.0004142622,0.000036925845,0.00009984895,0.0042266822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98976177,0.00378889,0.0005876516,0.0001893056,0.0005547416,0.0000825731,0.000031497362,0.000018880639,0.0049846796],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976055,0.00084455736,0.00040551234,0.00030986557,0.00017624229,0.00065831596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837965,0.0005743602,0.00025443727,0.0001514021,0.00047795998,0.00016216811],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008438814,0.0002403036,0.00035824004,0.00009933512,0.0011298133,0.00012364314,0.00013499151,0.00025175454,0.000052848947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085082016,0.00024718163,0.00012473101,0.000469885,0.001556925,0.0006595726,0.0000611502,0.0001691946,0.00012288927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004895226,0.00006506397,0.8690203,0.000028186218,0.00013795857,9.535154e-7,0.026998132,0.0003337524,0.00004134049,0.09296236,0.0012358335,0.009171234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002221348,0.00004086609,0.8630042,0.00004097748,0.000074313495,0.000001652356,0.043067243,0.00060708623,0.000005033153,0.08809637,0.0045995987,0.00024052855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071608566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014282318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05732625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019893402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017650163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976556915","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.510_3.x","title":"Mental Health Global Policies and Human Rights ‐ edited by Morrall, P. and Hazelton, M. and The Economics of Gender and Mental Illness ‐ edited by Marcotte, D.E. and Wilcox‐Gök, V.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociology of Health & Illness","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mental illness; Mental health; Human rights; Global mental health; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.011022840163637103,"score_gpt":0.2930642703550269,"score_spread":0.28204143019138983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976556915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9698641,0.016204782,0.000020348003,0.011534335,0.00051068375,0.00069955224,0.00083897944,0.000025567177,0.00030167523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900189,0.008021621,0.00005774442,0.0014243043,0.00016856146,0.000015133329,0.00019823352,0.000014311739,0.00008118792],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997377,0.0007257418,0.0006434657,0.00045377758,0.00017541436,0.0006246482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988789,0.00018569204,0.0004979507,0.00014623246,0.00006511405,0.00022612684],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014176273,0.00027039179,0.00075392117,0.00006338639,0.002539594,0.00003738861,0.00015369334,0.0002894764,0.0000048593156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014716268,0.00022085542,0.00003748679,0.000109971596,0.007703419,0.00017757661,0.00014742262,0.0001955526,1.06014525e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028574918,0.00035250705,0.45594585,0.00067026494,0.00028241222,9.842304e-7,0.20658192,0.000002870272,0.0001753466,0.2384555,0.0941205,0.0031260767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011393887,0.00079320633,0.66075814,0.00007923499,0.0000852987,0.000049525857,0.19298096,0.0002855223,0.000021912354,0.08575866,0.046719797,0.0010738444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05436438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006855192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20481229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015120787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017423561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976958742","doi":"10.1086/600076","title":"Is the Allocation of Resources within the Household Efficient? New Evidence from a Randomized Experiment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":312,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Pareto principle; Resource allocation; Randomized experiment; Pareto optimal; Distribution (mathematics); Pareto efficiency; Public good; Variation (astronomy); Demographic economics; Sample (material); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Statistics; Finance; Operations management; Multi-objective optimization","score_opus":0.04119652994875091,"score_gpt":0.3045562922925564,"score_spread":0.2633597623438055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976958742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9381052,0.0013278807,0.0026409314,0.048297282,0.0002860703,0.00026886072,0.0000034771688,0.00000770208,0.0090625705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952043,0.00004959656,0.0004689033,0.0035320085,0.00059470284,0.0000018461391,1.5228765e-7,0.000004231406,0.00014423543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983307,0.00041859382,0.00061381364,0.00009889881,0.00029977344,0.00023820419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976558,0.0014161963,0.00042498455,0.00018382586,0.00013089352,0.00018831732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020357482,0.000088346904,0.00032593927,0.000041211348,0.00018782969,0.00010228197,0.00047782745,0.000063183004,0.000043910994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006595952,0.000047379188,0.00020760768,0.00009946759,0.00044198486,0.00012991973,0.000019668103,0.00018327155,0.000003246201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011015956,0.000101364145,0.00069480686,0.0000027940416,0.000097636526,0.0000017318443,0.08048328,0.0009634239,0.00012990664,0.91504,0.0011965969,0.00018683147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.043446638,0.00058663794,0.034521732,0.00064368465,0.00079275976,0.000018738916,0.24283926,0.010404723,0.002679636,0.65369856,0.009707849,0.0006597966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002164877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046620567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26134148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011377189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004326348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3272661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977261672","doi":"10.1007/s10108-008-9041-y","title":"On the estimation of the effect of labour participation on fertility","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spanish Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Fertility; Estimation; Instrumental variable; Econometrics; Probit model; Labour economics; Multivariate probit model; Sample (material); Demographic economics; Population; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.0340708696894203,"score_gpt":0.3100665938889339,"score_spread":0.27599572419951357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977261672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98963326,0.0009195127,0.0000152361645,0.0008980346,0.00022179374,0.0006195207,0.000013613607,0.000008334539,0.007670682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941969,0.0052017863,0.000010334859,0.00037982565,0.000020301068,0.000026018988,0.0000017164548,0.000004284457,0.0001588212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888235,0.0004901453,0.00028760915,0.00011411191,0.00011570213,0.00011009855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990428,0.00035877165,0.00024224624,0.00030774405,0.000024282917,0.000024135119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012483621,0.00007177048,0.00022757813,0.000009389143,0.00018696931,0.0000062216486,0.0002212632,0.0000367187,0.00013814807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053025363,0.00004081557,0.00011062931,0.00008965696,0.00016464073,0.00004920604,0.000016127222,0.00006619747,0.00005332379],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013081841,0.00027539668,0.34210074,0.0040387237,0.00016724474,8.7113597e-7,0.009948904,0.010321449,0.000065848915,0.5673548,0.009192567,0.05640261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025764407,0.00026164058,0.98698336,0.0009036027,0.00007562911,3.2007753e-7,0.00012563658,0.0014307472,0.00044227895,0.004239307,0.0051407553,0.0001391082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037407136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021477292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64488256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082890714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000087266126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16644107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977723142","doi":"10.1080/15588740903176237","title":"Welfare-to-Work Programs in America, 1980 to 2005: Meta-Analytic Evidence of the Importance of Job and Child Care Availability","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy Practice","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Welfare; Psychological intervention; Work (physics); Intervention (counseling); Meta-analysis; Child care; Labour economics; Randomized controlled trial; Foster care; Psychology; Economics; Public economics; Demographic economics; Nursing; Medicine","score_opus":0.06828838271958337,"score_gpt":0.3763630193652784,"score_spread":0.308074636645695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977723142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87809885,0.0024816557,0.000047334946,0.11417853,0.000115106945,0.00047769537,0.0000070327465,0.0000050669305,0.004588752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935488,0.00047949588,0.003027309,0.002672968,0.00015355884,0.0000025823,1.06132184e-7,0.000006191693,0.00010895141],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972616,0.00063674216,0.0008010161,0.00018781729,0.0007890526,0.00032379414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970736,0.00049593317,0.0011582901,0.00035588568,0.0006786195,0.00023770059],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026177608,0.00013460443,0.0005432006,0.00017221236,0.00015812767,0.000052167292,0.00053754007,0.00007383731,0.000015177197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0108711,0.0000923477,0.00022917632,0.0017298828,0.00019575599,0.00056347245,0.000060841565,0.00036434954,0.0000015956889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076847326,0.0009570154,0.77494216,0.00017815335,0.0010250726,0.000033679065,0.18796933,0.0015404396,0.0002796549,0.016139295,0.0009772724,0.015189477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026732907,0.0005769091,0.9206493,0.00017747858,0.0010826252,0.00002238263,0.056467626,0.000007664142,0.000018083207,0.0006828376,0.019852173,0.0001955849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043906234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035770207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14570718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002356113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053927454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978343451","doi":"10.2202/1935-1682.2475","title":"Economic Incentives for a Healthy Diet: A Comparison of Policies in a Canadian Context","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Public economics; Incentive; Context (archaeology); Economics; Moral hazard; Psychological intervention; Environmental health; Business; Medicine; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.028234275132249933,"score_gpt":0.3600174635472321,"score_spread":0.33178318841498217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978343451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99046254,0.00022534055,0.00005031205,0.0063352855,0.00023036687,0.00016651466,0.000071559,0.0000025714228,0.0024555223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984853,0.00036981833,0.00007534987,0.00044842725,0.00049148884,0.000003137037,0.0000027479525,0.000009302922,0.00011440269],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834985,0.00017044015,0.00083246146,0.00010494957,0.00007402601,0.00046826052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982188,0.00033643193,0.0008559139,0.00020484338,0.00008747224,0.00029654728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019208384,0.00011680572,0.00063597516,0.0010383856,0.0002622886,0.000047101687,0.00060124486,0.00009848762,0.00005084126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014525255,0.00009779517,0.00034257682,0.00031852323,0.00036005155,0.00016444492,0.000022880395,0.00022800098,0.000007465184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017445095,0.0000618656,0.7944391,0.0000068764994,0.0006045158,2.6154908e-7,0.0844701,0.004261288,0.000048363636,0.11457462,0.0005654448,0.0007931512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018563399,0.00046421017,0.7615365,0.000020989053,0.0010754934,0.0000034079465,0.17342125,0.016645938,0.00004258557,0.014131811,0.030362526,0.00043898553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88743305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10550017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084132195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037065311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6575227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978764717","doi":"10.5354/n.v0i13.15288","title":"Derrotando el bigenerismo: cambiando supuestos de género en el siglo XXI","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Nomadías","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.029688232539345008,"score_gpt":0.29532203875926555,"score_spread":0.26563380621992055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978764717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89858556,0.0010976046,0.0008992867,0.00046303388,0.0019197343,0.0004907419,0.000116457515,0.00019323602,0.09623435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98972124,0.0024410586,0.0012969503,0.00092268357,0.001136257,0.000046362366,0.000022288777,0.000084933294,0.004328225],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961123,0.0005554644,0.0005637366,0.0007333554,0.0006842576,0.001350872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980805,0.00018647661,0.00024815448,0.0006710498,0.00022519723,0.0005886324],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010229859,0.000496719,0.0005632379,0.00016598738,0.00085364596,0.00023055865,0.0009945888,0.0007006939,0.0004038629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023272478,0.00051324465,0.00029449092,0.0006529972,0.0005410754,0.00032857165,0.00018647325,0.00045904762,0.0004382232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015309807,0.00086802774,0.770801,0.00013260513,0.0002677216,0.0002323314,0.16329353,0.000035095058,0.0032527756,0.050954603,0.003922585,0.0060866065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031776738,0.0005823087,0.87964207,0.00014079522,0.00045336148,0.00003937931,0.045942597,0.0011047838,0.0014530716,0.015543412,0.049965907,0.0019546316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015471817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035684304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11735093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035650074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086479494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979296778","doi":"10.7202/051136ar","title":"Work-Sharing Benefits in Canada: An Effective Employment Stabilization Policy Measure?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Work (physics); Business cycle; Economics; Persistence (discontinuity); Hysteresis; Econometrics; Measure (data warehouse); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Macroeconomics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03438666976251741,"score_gpt":0.27426247810926474,"score_spread":0.23987580834674732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979296778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873105,0.00025008628,0.00028409003,0.0017801734,0.00013481334,0.0004267656,0.000015551277,0.000044303004,0.0097536845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987476,0.00008611606,0.00012351721,0.000089926136,0.00025884403,0.000033051318,0.00002461454,0.000013149468,0.00062320766],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986988,0.00015450113,0.00023981946,0.00023664012,0.0003477491,0.00032251774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936616,0.00012953214,0.00007284275,0.00017695136,0.00011581669,0.00013869388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004123633,0.000108504406,0.000116306255,0.00017995355,0.00043446946,0.000048602004,0.0001773579,0.00018442357,0.000054921307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032193863,0.00012203408,0.000021602506,0.0012098369,0.00004890022,0.00030184496,0.000029398449,0.0002612409,0.000010362147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031222526,0.000050398787,0.8377413,3.7390234e-7,0.000009703382,5.905954e-7,0.011504675,0.077560015,0.000002069486,0.025414387,0.00016182133,0.047551524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034676795,0.000016006115,0.96856123,0.000044190278,0.000013514374,2.1309566e-7,0.017909756,0.0021494483,0.000014852865,0.00046453392,0.010248807,0.00023067812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7925937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9846457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19205199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030753263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026813087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8041871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984055542","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2012-073","title":"Opting or Not Opting to Share Income Tax Information with the Census: Does It Affect Research Findings?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Census; Economics; Wage; Distribution (mathematics); Income distribution; Demographic economics; Economic inequality; Income tax; Inequality; Actuarial science; Opting out; Gross income; Labour economics; Public economics; Econometrics; State income tax; Tax reform; Sociology; Demography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05571437757677609,"score_gpt":0.3457242188894699,"score_spread":0.2900098413126938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984055542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7744402,0.0000053666013,0.0001193489,0.13727494,0.00022623436,0.0007677703,0.00035259494,0.00008563293,0.08672786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891052,0.000007668541,0.0003039592,0.0073766015,0.00075775455,0.000056800054,0.000036591104,0.000017527005,0.0023378942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723625,0.0003534355,0.00020498395,0.00021056489,0.00063502043,0.0013597272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975979,0.00044541445,0.00007158663,0.0003388932,0.0004793845,0.0010668554],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035602592,0.00014303623,0.00014779178,0.0008957083,0.0025421476,0.0012176292,0.00085578236,0.00014239238,0.0000700201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005951991,0.00008922069,0.000034893204,0.0023440963,0.00024449427,0.00084164867,0.000099958874,0.00036705344,0.000097120996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040771618,0.000017700815,0.042891886,0.0001260254,0.000069685855,0.000012134707,0.23416576,0.0001867084,0.000020712068,0.60613024,0.074632764,0.04170564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027214835,0.00009605155,0.065705515,0.000068573034,0.0000053288527,0.0000034319862,0.073881395,0.0006855108,0.0000043550826,0.00021950746,0.85873514,0.00032305525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55158556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9236921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7841024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011855217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050010593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987035634","doi":"10.1111/1467-8462.00205","title":"A Hitchhiker's Guide to the World's Household Panel Data Sets","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Panel data; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; British Household Panel Survey; Panel survey; German; Economics; Demographic economics; Panel analysis; Labour economics; Econometrics; Geography","score_opus":0.18301228210913822,"score_gpt":0.37742186912182624,"score_spread":0.194409587012688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987035634","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12606058,0.07010858,0.00023753883,0.41750398,0.00849038,0.0085667595,0.0020850669,0.00079416507,0.36615297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12236777,0.43379235,0.0025075036,0.049789995,0.0025264744,0.00018172842,0.00035094962,0.00012660857,0.38835663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998011,0.00021184783,0.0005395907,0.0005193382,0.00015442961,0.00056382833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793327,0.00008594532,0.00016254594,0.0015181014,0.000025750218,0.00027438498],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018398134,0.00019593802,0.00037219425,0.00005032071,0.0003631026,0.00015477151,0.0019370399,0.0000641132,0.0009013542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010455732,0.0001570319,0.00010529594,0.00032538967,0.0001302692,0.00032597626,0.00021497211,0.00016353943,0.001961481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014879809,0.00001528295,0.008013796,0.0000659698,0.000032403193,0.000008935447,0.0004581042,0.00005183601,7.107229e-7,0.0026270263,0.97290707,0.015817355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008224154,0.0000072575313,0.011491912,0.00024964777,0.000059355825,0.0000065830486,0.0006481993,0.000017271577,1.9870888e-7,0.00015405743,0.9870705,0.0002127588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042891433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033589337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.367714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021146139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028671284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987534562","doi":"10.1002/hec.1232","title":"Care‐giver advice as a preventive measure for drinking during pregnancy: zeros, categorical outcome responses, and endogeneity","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Endogeneity; Counterintuitive; Categorical variable; Consumption (sociology); Sample (material); Excise; Advice (programming); Econometrics; Economics; Medicine; Actuarial science; Psychology; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04789747843459485,"score_gpt":0.3394741681094939,"score_spread":0.291576689674899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987534562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991242,0.0029491766,0.001235136,0.0005202116,0.0006725629,0.0010989734,0.000053614578,0.000094817246,0.0021335268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99517405,0.0016704446,0.0015617284,0.00040096437,0.00023177288,0.000036853166,0.000013472789,0.000028301214,0.00088239316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804777,0.00015723615,0.00049152924,0.00043415625,0.000120032535,0.00074927835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987733,0.00030750246,0.00023498417,0.00020182077,0.00012362834,0.0003588097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001210461,0.00017011382,0.00033218347,0.000096559124,0.0010525256,0.0000674651,0.00018605521,0.00018080366,0.000005922494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000190594,0.00019781622,0.00009151121,0.0001079546,0.00011406423,0.00018656933,0.00006296594,0.00017996991,0.00000670512],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003669137,0.0000908232,0.8342636,0.0004533766,0.00006806635,0.000012785606,0.09913467,0.00004323581,0.000024544614,0.053182326,0.000057911067,0.012301728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034960841,0.00035158006,0.87315476,0.00015017728,0.000071084396,0.000027896662,0.066639274,0.00022891408,0.000087009066,0.008185822,0.046637837,0.00096953823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030610096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026408052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046579927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000958844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089254417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99135745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988091025","doi":"10.1007/s001480100106","title":"Child care workers' wages: New evidence on returns to education, experience, job tenure and auspice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Wage; Labour economics; Economics; Child care; Social policy; Demographic economics; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.03485260881919084,"score_gpt":0.30461525540584855,"score_spread":0.2697626465866577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988091025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98882633,0.00092103425,0.00007261802,0.0036659506,0.0012528228,0.00014359015,0.0000024085132,0.000009755009,0.005105487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99396276,0.0012209415,0.001371952,0.00096985436,0.0009987132,0.0000016623618,0.0000015502553,0.000009745009,0.0014628301],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991096,0.000054499917,0.00038072976,0.00015108142,0.00013972909,0.00016432528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990611,0.00006146563,0.0003071845,0.0001364641,0.00016274693,0.0002710601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002134612,0.00009784846,0.00016169556,0.00015386971,0.00030689576,0.00014287165,0.00017285482,0.000095961506,0.00005951243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031507915,0.000097811295,0.00005277675,0.00017042267,0.00003559531,0.0005776466,0.000015974887,0.00015477295,0.000012211922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021319667,0.00004338779,0.8165889,0.00000980681,0.000015330344,9.69844e-7,0.15388791,0.0024717648,0.0000038676853,0.0054540453,0.0072514303,0.014251267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020121093,0.00012878256,0.8674162,0.00020435448,0.000023092512,0.000011631446,0.104871504,0.00012682198,0.0000020733,0.00094496773,0.025871607,0.0001977787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071691116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002289678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050827283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029909666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013912516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39886287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989315198","doi":"10.1080/0007131022000021461","title":"Explaining gender segregation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Occupational segregation; Patriarchy; Preference; Empowerment; Inequality; Demographic economics; Gender inequality; Human capital; Sociology; Gender studies; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Mathematics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.050762242905488975,"score_gpt":0.28990359406908023,"score_spread":0.23914135116359125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989315198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.966194,0.003771354,0.000958766,0.0005891029,0.0009590386,0.000047075137,0.0000038225708,0.000018767494,0.027458118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931977,0.0040401476,0.0009967982,0.00056346337,0.0006197012,9.666605e-7,0.0000013394055,0.000008093594,0.00057181035],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882907,0.0003125087,0.00028879615,0.00008870901,0.00021615879,0.00026478543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999252,0.00013071498,0.00023330236,0.000042306765,0.00023818821,0.000103461796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083968695,0.000056776335,0.00017272703,0.00005285643,0.00042743867,0.000045048517,0.00018583782,0.00018308696,0.00045722103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003075344,0.0000699372,0.00009597713,0.00008595482,0.00036796526,0.00020988277,0.000014442026,0.00029566282,0.000023887222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020132384,0.00036094277,0.26328328,0.000030643227,0.00031470382,0.0012529102,0.43365622,0.0002864458,0.0005065063,0.12051249,0.069716804,0.11005894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027210796,0.0003223304,0.53559303,0.00012605893,0.00011359337,0.0023194351,0.28910333,0.0005250009,0.0000084407175,0.118210964,0.050290044,0.00066669297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011218487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013360009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27230975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008792358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000698074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50062495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989501125","doi":"10.1177/0268580909102916","title":"Household Surveys as a Source of Data for Event History Analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Socioeconomic status; Hazard; Event data; Poverty; Econometrics; Data source; Sociology; Geography; Demographic economics; Computer science; Demography; Economics; Economic growth; Data mining; Population","score_opus":0.08814675501875165,"score_gpt":0.35952211428416364,"score_spread":0.271375359265412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989501125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8453779,0.00049631495,0.13804984,0.003451191,0.0012181246,0.00019488836,0.0002977574,0.000059772763,0.010854183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945698,0.00010045644,0.00071576587,0.0007444545,0.00024207176,0.000004624133,0.0003718225,0.000004557869,0.003246459],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892807,0.00025978606,0.00021281515,0.00022651003,0.0002093494,0.00016349541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991354,0.00028251132,0.00015070471,0.00022492309,0.0001627706,0.000043723776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014975276,0.000063473635,0.00017729173,0.00011358914,0.000079554884,0.0000056077124,0.0007464573,0.00012803318,0.0001361852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034616087,0.00006648753,0.00012392098,0.00008612989,0.0002684148,0.00009562378,0.000051740324,0.00007045751,0.0000049282717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079405974,0.0007168636,0.4497949,0.000009943393,0.0026908873,0.0000051933957,0.055507768,0.0033086946,0.0006141627,0.4383915,0.034255117,0.014625566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000570648,0.00013032941,0.6370533,0.000003751586,0.00026337663,6.485054e-7,0.005668518,0.0050124796,0.0000030398394,0.03243819,0.3186217,0.00023401677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034321975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012419741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40595332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002658791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021058106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5188479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989773820","doi":"10.1017/s1474746409990303","title":"A LEAP forward or a LEAP back? Revelations about the Learning, Earning and Parenting (LEAP) program of Ontario Works","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Workfare; Poverty; Political science; Poverty level; Qualitative research; Sociology; Economic growth; Psychology; Demographic economics; Economics; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.033162270639099586,"score_gpt":0.33408162780650735,"score_spread":0.30091935716740775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989773820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97964364,0.00009758333,0.00018483985,0.0018448662,0.00020235301,0.0004032338,0.0000069897196,0.00007400836,0.017542467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98298526,0.00037545004,0.001607134,0.00031827626,0.0011419173,0.00002660666,0.000008880088,0.000017914479,0.013518546],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985508,0.00016553201,0.00026285052,0.00023972044,0.00028566175,0.0004954902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923265,0.0001947254,0.00021944367,0.00009816532,0.00013582218,0.00011922323],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010021804,0.00015479788,0.00024175197,0.00002660062,0.0030640103,0.00024018165,0.00017383986,0.00035851798,0.00005807304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000400683,0.00012267422,0.00019233469,0.0004157989,0.0010783676,0.00019546514,0.00010292976,0.0009358235,0.0000025788408],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000111913,0.000067199166,0.17356624,0.000040391395,0.00009881073,3.296033e-7,0.7666148,0.000011050947,0.000056711244,0.034356132,0.0008260021,0.024351126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069982506,0.00009172581,0.59334475,0.00005352159,0.00009835616,0.0000016862248,0.20297292,0.0005036175,0.0000016041411,0.0044590826,0.19740826,0.00036463773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060830973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17889297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5636419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000989251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011197196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99823385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992148114","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.10.021","title":"Only Mine or All Ours: Do Stronger Entitlements Affect Altruistic Choices in the Household","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Grand Challenges Canada","keywords":"Earnings; Consumption (sociology); Affect (linguistics); Economics; Preference; Social preferences; Population; Microeconomics; Demographic economics; Psychology; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.047471233106432004,"score_gpt":0.30961017569497584,"score_spread":0.26213894258854387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992148114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9363854,0.00013239132,0.00024161964,0.0008930173,0.00096301635,0.0005415302,0.000007768219,0.00006581049,0.06076945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793892,0.000045497058,0.0019949598,0.0011589988,0.00021114654,0.00004563343,0.00001815124,0.000015234011,0.017121209],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981101,0.0002438302,0.00026732055,0.0002727203,0.00061033905,0.0004956837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933285,0.00022812124,0.000089981746,0.00022029087,0.00003465353,0.00009413351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014890012,0.00015886908,0.00016791238,0.00014652318,0.00026653643,0.00015522132,0.0005138254,0.000047793492,0.00023704379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011826875,0.00010899263,0.000035969297,0.00044032538,0.000076465505,0.00008346955,0.00006168034,0.00014023691,0.000075946315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033859957,0.000451092,0.8838442,0.00005400212,0.000104084145,0.000023323753,0.056305088,0.0001154821,0.000019966697,0.019353826,0.02295532,0.016739748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031764898,0.000016738702,0.42219526,0.000029956052,0.000011327742,3.8582002e-7,0.0032054181,0.000015736929,0.0000034741056,0.00016871774,0.57387424,0.00016108245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005638788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08286701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55091894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019552767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034437227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9338683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992684798","doi":"10.3138/cpp.39.2.241","title":"Quebec, Daycare, and the Household Strategies of Couples with Young Children","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Child care; Demographic economics; Rest (music); Division of labour; Labour economics; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.013275873994971151,"score_gpt":0.2243280461011413,"score_spread":0.21105217210617014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992684798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92556757,0.00037913298,0.000013323127,0.011476017,0.000056498095,0.00035961185,0.00010332241,0.000032134358,0.062012367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974129,0.0002633393,0.000028094351,0.0007770412,0.00020431129,0.000021622194,0.000012643586,0.000012991215,0.0012670391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895155,0.00008468365,0.00012474543,0.00014504457,0.00019474328,0.0004991998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907476,0.000048554055,0.00006470007,0.00022077488,0.00013193635,0.00045925853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025101946,0.00010481062,0.0001485926,0.00019810228,0.00046336657,0.00047702473,0.0003426229,0.00008515912,0.000032461845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010555979,0.00007245456,0.0000275409,0.00047891273,0.0012274669,0.00043269392,0.000019501073,0.00010040401,0.0000038686276],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.9510814e-7,0.0000040919804,0.120156124,0.0000034412546,0.000030918956,5.303567e-7,0.006883616,0.0000039466454,0.0000014025791,0.8684612,0.0034740467,0.0009797878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041950343,0.000011378266,0.9575112,0.000005902626,0.000011365241,0.0000036111512,0.031871304,0.000036139663,3.5982592e-7,0.0043560313,0.0056432257,0.00013001199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99573225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86410517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016541366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007055322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993299296","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2013.04.003","title":"On refutability of the Nash bargaining solution","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining problem; Economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Subgame; Nash equilibrium; Epsilon-equilibrium; Best response","score_opus":0.028164037395038904,"score_gpt":0.26955963496009033,"score_spread":0.24139559756505144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993299296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688973,0.000012047144,0.0015708646,0.001142039,0.00027130055,0.00011174543,0.0000018326297,0.000004002391,0.027988903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99723524,0.000040274906,0.0023022525,0.0001752241,0.000111476234,0.0000011241756,8.096004e-8,0.0000058339115,0.000128483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990146,0.00009538901,0.0005202873,0.00006443626,0.00014940528,0.00015583725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987693,0.00040572524,0.00042746527,0.0001576422,0.00015185274,0.00008801516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013353865,0.000063453976,0.00021892201,0.000031673233,0.00012885345,0.00003741225,0.00029739944,0.000083480714,0.00020554394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087361754,0.000042740794,0.00015352687,0.00006129276,0.00020840706,0.00017286194,0.000034473785,0.00017758324,0.00003066987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014167402,0.00026238838,0.004582769,0.000038412756,0.00005076142,3.3286716e-7,0.009549177,0.000814113,0.00020841282,0.9809785,0.00075028534,0.0027506866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024569605,0.000080091646,0.013840686,0.0000564117,0.000022476015,0.00000438075,0.0063919006,0.0051416014,0.000061043924,0.97374153,0.00032845576,0.000085743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027500491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024718065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028337985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015189208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018064724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2250562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994255920","doi":"10.1007/s10644-014-9155-1","title":"Female employment in MENA’s manufacturing sector: the implications of firm-related and national factors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Change and Restructuring","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Economic Research Forum; World Bank Group","keywords":"Logit; Manufacturing sector; Demographic economics; Middle East; Ordered logit; Economics; Private sector; Foreign ownership; Econometric model; Business; Labour economics; Economic growth; Political science; Foreign direct investment; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.09262980340248449,"score_gpt":0.2961067696667497,"score_spread":0.2034769662642652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994255920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962888,0.00030341855,0.0000011547415,0.00045909826,0.00020717924,0.00016924909,0.00002050392,0.0000110946285,0.002539497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994549,0.000265541,0.000023970044,0.00003193012,0.00010932128,0.000010221909,0.00000549057,0.000005593322,0.000092987066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946815,0.000034620163,0.00015137298,0.00014006677,0.00006576162,0.00014005194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972475,0.000054552656,0.00006915881,0.00007257771,0.000012976915,0.00006599318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002427575,0.00006843806,0.00009652931,0.00006413426,0.00015611648,0.000029779636,0.00008930089,0.00005593507,0.000014291116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012623812,0.00005421786,0.000016517657,0.000031082498,0.00011183756,0.00011802372,0.000051963045,0.00006769786,8.720085e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052380265,0.000010331818,0.8468437,0.000015621226,0.00003208547,5.808972e-7,0.1403024,0.0002832415,0.00006122254,0.010960919,0.000050448787,0.0014341731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023241153,0.000009109528,0.9749983,0.000008367725,0.000004604553,0.000001454672,0.01604063,0.00010084315,0.000101749545,0.0073995306,0.0010228205,0.00008017187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037369614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006413572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12815458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001386156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006564782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5649193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994570475","doi":"10.1007/s11113-007-9033-x","title":"The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: a review of the literature","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Population Research and Policy Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":644,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Imperfect; Economics; Empirical evidence; Developed country; Developing country; Demographic economics; Public economics; Population; Economic growth; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.2911103288434083,"score_gpt":0.562643414175933,"score_spread":0.2715330853325247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994570475","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022958871,0.9920112,1.4686884e-7,0.0011760422,0.00007753497,0.0035852757,0.0002722285,0.0000070267756,0.002640962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002116649,0.9986598,0.000002433059,0.00036853764,0.00019469456,0.00008299585,0.00006829259,0.000017546392,0.00039403405],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991668,0.004698772,0.0014476207,0.0002934849,0.0012506159,0.0006414935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959008,0.0017173027,0.00074571493,0.0007627388,0.0007072346,0.0001662222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013004617,0.00029944238,0.001743792,0.00035736142,0.00048026352,0.00008976815,0.00080579746,0.00037792875,0.000017997896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007637162,0.00014407611,0.00062537356,0.0051127616,0.0006977449,0.000082838116,0.00013799674,0.001013084,0.0000036065278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035252255,0.000092840455,0.002993616,0.28428552,0.00010752826,9.60344e-7,0.0014056092,2.3980715e-7,3.720679e-8,0.03341686,0.0062581636,0.67140335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080697624,0.000049313378,0.0080723055,0.28219256,0.00004859458,6.615101e-7,0.00005646578,2.4428252e-7,6.342133e-9,0.00078106864,0.7086235,0.00009453888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026773365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010556901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7023654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050172006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023958941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9797074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996331474","doi":"10.1007/s12147-001-0008-7","title":"Gender differences in the Canadian economy, with some comparisons to the United States (Part I: Labour force characteristics)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gender Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.06300889122042569,"score_gpt":0.2892121173108166,"score_spread":0.2262032260903909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996331474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687684,0.00031072187,0.00020987581,0.016417002,0.00030575626,0.00054405694,0.00010313878,0.000050506056,0.013290523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886968,0.0006133846,0.00010294215,0.007457235,0.0004379847,0.000055278197,0.00008955542,0.000017307446,0.0025294707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799985,0.00033745647,0.0002480894,0.00030509938,0.00033516972,0.00077433186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999021,0.0001366928,0.00007621178,0.0003674579,0.00013965591,0.00025897115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007199336,0.00020918561,0.00023974592,0.00019201194,0.0011280448,0.00045492142,0.0007931877,0.00010015662,0.00014263106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040095,0.00012728281,0.000037151214,0.0007152703,0.00023805673,0.00016589639,0.000038273774,0.0002478307,0.00008717422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015022603,0.000058099944,0.6916414,0.000010525281,0.000059923208,0.000027490494,0.21131717,0.00026313734,8.280645e-7,0.08570905,0.010762606,0.00013474395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001172012,0.000027900076,0.4586587,0.0000062586846,0.000015874344,0.0000022712632,0.14508423,0.00033422667,4.8101253e-7,0.0029106855,0.39264715,0.0001950518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3968529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8581415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46128857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015966817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041969045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86761224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998959009","doi":"10.3386/w11832","title":"Universal Childcare, Maternal Labor Supply, and Family Well-Being","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":271,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Victoria","keywords":"Business; Labour economics; Economics","score_opus":0.11637047058869074,"score_gpt":0.44278373847104524,"score_spread":0.3264132678823545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998959009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17280954,0.0010133467,0.0000020362195,0.0008432421,0.0006597608,0.00035686404,0.00023059263,0.000023019868,0.8240616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9324779,0.025183612,0.00033641048,0.00006541795,0.0027391126,0.000018376886,0.00030202258,0.000046509347,0.03883065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959837,0.00028486236,0.00050568173,0.00053579296,0.002091721,0.000598199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969559,0.00053974194,0.00023096004,0.00020420965,0.0018476852,0.00022155824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004747268,0.00021120496,0.00041403397,0.0007651235,0.00049754203,0.00017245891,0.00063214864,0.00054083415,0.00057448394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038486772,0.00023749749,0.000118054304,0.00023724488,0.0007503489,0.00027098565,0.00020768058,0.00072268327,0.00010277021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004325151,0.000072751,0.17210919,0.00012450328,0.00024662772,0.000015140426,0.0026872077,0.00019525235,0.000046773752,0.7858708,0.035110306,0.0034781843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096752396,0.00010643399,0.42176706,0.00022042723,0.00004481972,0.000017074879,0.0070797526,0.00033840153,0.000018186267,0.14398427,0.4247962,0.00065987615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030914268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004726111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78523093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023073826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075326106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002878363","doi":"10.1177/1097184x07306735","title":"Regular Section Book Review: Doucet, A. (2006). Do Men Mother? Fatherhood, Care, and Domestic Responsibility. Toronto: University of Toronto Press","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Men and Masculinities","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Sociology; Gerontology; Gender studies; Media studies; Medicine; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.010040889503047122,"score_gpt":0.2604318551033776,"score_spread":0.2503909656003305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002878363","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0701824,0.5891481,0.00023946838,0.000074801465,0.00021370531,0.0005801372,0.00003682322,0.00006626016,0.33945832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20439826,0.7640798,0.0005910175,0.00024867101,0.00022425668,0.0000034521634,0.000010695921,0.00001921673,0.03042461],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988644,0.0002265458,0.00018428208,0.00024228232,0.00024600184,0.00023650411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999315,0.00012114753,0.00008935233,0.00020993863,0.00015090108,0.00011362308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010598454,0.00012343153,0.00024780937,0.0000090570275,0.0003197531,0.000029534493,0.000118855125,0.000117373565,0.00017079189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005951467,0.00012281588,0.00005745994,0.000029678407,0.00032969096,0.00034315264,0.000049834787,0.00006021608,6.1985094e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062706426,0.0001574375,0.007875359,0.0024034819,0.0002840173,0.000038532176,0.915063,0.000008032894,0.00024247967,0.018936513,0.02842209,0.02594199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072299945,0.00018359952,0.011747348,0.00020918984,0.00014286846,0.0000035693806,0.49262148,0.000017919872,0.000014154008,0.0004508694,0.49363574,0.00025025356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05981678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044245377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46521366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029038123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010653096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97319466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005524516","doi":"10.1007/s001480100099","title":"Employment and child-care choices of single-parent families in Canada and the United States","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Subsidy; Social policy; Demographic economics; Single mothers; Economics; Wage; Labour economics; Psychology; Medicine; Nursing; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.023776481941515683,"score_gpt":0.2369391402207217,"score_spread":0.21316265827920602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005524516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99810195,0.000764888,0.0000060952752,0.0006177986,0.00017650143,0.0000713916,0.000011172267,0.0000012211393,0.0002490086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99434334,0.005389527,0.00006382309,0.00013372561,0.00004665135,4.2146453e-7,0.0000056434924,0.0000035404462,0.000013307851],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993526,0.00007043502,0.00035333473,0.000053108924,0.00008085751,0.00008971343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942434,0.00009173324,0.0003290336,0.000043490287,0.000065058506,0.000046334048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021564624,0.000053650903,0.00015441504,0.000093379014,0.00010300131,0.000033239856,0.000070742695,0.000024578929,0.0000062824965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004005771,0.000041898005,0.000019720737,0.00007694392,0.00007838173,0.00012741964,0.000012749392,0.000064263346,5.074702e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012037917,0.000011929483,0.96467006,0.00000832786,0.000014703859,3.9742042e-7,0.018511627,0.013830473,5.1512967e-7,0.0013780699,0.00001490353,0.0015469643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007880271,0.000027482241,0.92192996,0.000026451067,0.000016134547,0.000002068509,0.068055384,0.0065090107,0.0000012556945,0.000776966,0.0018014704,0.0000657667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7444453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9607086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2162633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026395134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057307792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25725642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006128255","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4932.2008.00486.x","title":"The Impact of Lifecycle Events on Women's Labour Force Transitions: A Panel Analysis*","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Record","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Panel data; Economics; Childbirth; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Pregnancy; Finance","score_opus":0.027632134919408077,"score_gpt":0.28634408539047607,"score_spread":0.258711950471068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006128255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913777,0.000030435833,0.00012467385,0.00022428513,0.00026515723,0.00014563517,0.000067904126,0.000022756727,0.0077414187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945174,0.0008449836,0.000051903928,0.000066021224,0.00011095543,0.000021195045,0.000006073873,0.000008815966,0.0043726466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899584,0.00013197631,0.00027154878,0.00017983437,0.000090616406,0.00033017644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930835,0.00016270322,0.0001435651,0.00024340447,0.00002645644,0.00011552432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045238552,0.0001006738,0.00023225359,0.000096521944,0.00053658785,0.000019647245,0.0002418185,0.00006775813,0.00023947385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003124692,0.00007899291,0.000286124,0.0002481459,0.00012933722,0.00011240914,0.000010488488,0.00008508006,0.00008068283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019113648,0.00026889966,0.89114434,0.0000081388425,0.0018400158,0.0000047257117,0.05805638,0.017264724,0.000048735514,0.023681145,0.0015397246,0.0059520467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037332444,0.00016414536,0.97778285,0.0000040728937,0.00004145203,7.095143e-7,0.0088787265,0.0020400614,0.0000020904718,0.007842878,0.002700373,0.00016929356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043166205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028502722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08663855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041233547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027970484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65254676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006720023","doi":"10.1080/00036840601032185","title":"Semiparametric quantile Engel curves and expenditure elasticities: a penalized quantile regression spline approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Engel curve; Quantile regression; Quantile; Econometrics; Economics; Nonparametric statistics; Mathematics; Spline (mechanical); Smoothing; Statistics; Price index","score_opus":0.03386574123572352,"score_gpt":0.26766727316363415,"score_spread":0.23380153192791062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006720023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94953454,0.001950628,0.0019231802,0.00010860735,0.0003255724,0.00052653934,0.000051883704,0.0001279605,0.045451097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715765,0.021799568,0.004517267,0.00047226818,0.00029417514,0.00006831545,0.00009587799,0.00003758592,0.0011384086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983414,0.00006230079,0.0003947817,0.0005238005,0.00017292652,0.00050480815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989177,0.00028598247,0.0002215862,0.0003069557,0.00004203822,0.0002257606],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004561603,0.00026194425,0.000465555,0.00016957313,0.0007319475,0.00007415502,0.00032505213,0.00025965882,0.00009119739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007910632,0.00025512464,0.00008343839,0.00026865504,0.00043616473,0.00019214717,0.00009892562,0.00025216088,0.000042626743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055860943,0.0015670981,0.081528895,0.001034669,0.000474292,0.000029960527,0.14219701,0.005660034,0.0006165947,0.7061941,0.055428814,0.004709891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01643778,0.0005669677,0.14055973,0.0005957186,0.000711264,0.00022814913,0.4106561,0.07368419,0.0007155558,0.04068896,0.3065826,0.008572989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042212743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001676756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6655052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108099564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019869191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006908034","doi":"10.1159/000278595","title":"A Follow-up Study of Transsexualists: Social and Economic Aspects","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychiatria Clinica","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Download; Subject (documents); Library science; Social media; Psychology; History; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.048328208230509026,"score_gpt":0.3727337717821998,"score_spread":0.32440556355169076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006908034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9767903,0.000046821373,0.000010723753,0.0011330494,0.005878128,0.00043799184,0.000028936845,0.00005016582,0.015623869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978783,0.00009252738,0.00028399116,0.000103118684,0.0012638588,0.000010343692,0.000002499506,0.00001641675,0.00034891695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843884,0.0002014339,0.0005333653,0.0003507078,0.00020484622,0.000270827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990908,0.0002644467,0.00022442732,0.00023613122,0.000056312587,0.00012790982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013091617,0.00012899585,0.00034174736,0.00006882621,0.00042375125,0.000052991556,0.0003222286,0.00020343397,0.000132483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012135011,0.00013282256,0.00012039359,0.00014400671,0.00025847708,0.00009639296,0.000027416423,0.0002890184,0.000014119961],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020088853,0.0010237242,0.7752171,0.000021735743,0.00016990624,0.0000014971914,0.119514495,0.0000011299484,0.00009124608,0.099731036,0.0022217368,0.0018054745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008639309,0.00079089054,0.8105252,0.0000045192355,0.00025830916,7.786573e-7,0.13474265,0.000044175682,0.0000012189454,0.027276114,0.017234202,0.0004826325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045233485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18887262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18434927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017661398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033714596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82592833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006996873","doi":"10.1111/1475-4932.00025","title":"Cross‐National Variation in the Labour Market Participation of Married Women in Australia, Canada and the United States of America","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Record","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); Differential (mechanical device); Regional variation; Demographic economics; Economics; Political science; Geography; Labour economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.025604985781645342,"score_gpt":0.2768317092315412,"score_spread":0.2512267234498959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006996873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970816,0.000006514241,0.000007193258,0.00058777176,0.000106153304,0.00013258844,0.000050171893,0.0000015912716,0.002026413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854296,0.00014709098,0.0000332709,0.00017700456,0.000021716334,0.000021769662,0.0000071661184,0.000002179225,0.0010468427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991569,0.00027187684,0.00026002334,0.00007843006,0.00008935466,0.00014343261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993462,0.0003764408,0.00015534967,0.00006402297,0.00003591444,0.000022102142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010830128,0.000042116015,0.00010638648,0.000051984185,0.000048903392,0.00002261348,0.000112139765,0.00002714124,0.00041939013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013053243,0.00003234699,0.0000102130925,0.00017371566,0.00015105584,0.000073687144,0.0000083257,0.000049757324,9.58624e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068553454,0.000035997164,0.89672947,0.000011116167,0.000018172259,3.4506567e-7,0.088778585,0.0058390186,0.000003020086,0.0064471625,0.0010638194,0.0010047151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004561771,0.000010472994,0.95969814,0.0000023487376,0.0000017783885,4.6384496e-8,0.008019017,0.022231976,4.801828e-7,0.005899517,0.0036395912,0.00004046299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89474255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8610432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08075957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026017023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013267776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45920277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007100734","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.09.012","title":"Estimation of collective household models with Engel curves","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Econometrics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Engel curve; Econometrics; Economics; Equivalence (formal languages); Estimation; Consumption (sociology); Bargaining power; Scale (ratio); Microeconomics; Mathematics; Price index; Geography","score_opus":0.1703286526948699,"score_gpt":0.26893012057829063,"score_spread":0.09860146788342072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007100734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95514363,0.001549019,0.022631917,0.000122015255,0.00021362248,0.00010703877,0.00002040053,0.000007803832,0.02020453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98971933,0.0044659846,0.0050964416,0.00008154974,0.00007216925,8.7447444e-7,7.014103e-7,0.000008065093,0.00055486494],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990734,0.000055025295,0.00035527706,0.000073775875,0.0002999065,0.00014260595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868715,0.0002272324,0.0005585069,0.000077391946,0.00034762302,0.000102118356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006558923,0.000068930785,0.0002488546,0.0006112183,0.00016676844,0.000016115398,0.00018341366,0.0000607144,0.000018820709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030540995,0.00005958219,0.000072343755,0.0015632879,0.0001413036,0.0005207825,0.000010680478,0.00013021554,7.447712e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022165182,0.0012430763,0.37273112,0.00027713957,0.0005581039,0.000081525555,0.08000336,0.49711934,0.000021183787,0.02835966,0.015097004,0.004286851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00629559,0.0038511623,0.80594474,0.0006296829,0.0004696357,0.00028806197,0.040262476,0.083150886,0.00024196685,0.052056666,0.0053836396,0.001425479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006146174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007191058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43321362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021964542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072958454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24296913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009979255","doi":"10.1257/pol.3.3.175","title":"Do Child Tax Benefits Affect the Well-being of Children? Evidence from Canadian Child Benefit Expansions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Economic Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":394,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Mental health; Test (biology); Child health; Psychology; Physical health; Health benefits; Medicine; Psychiatry; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.016369905490315383,"score_gpt":0.25854375502022064,"score_spread":0.24217384952990526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009979255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91326475,0.00065165904,0.000012084089,0.003901199,0.0007661738,0.00029177172,0.00025635416,0.000027072234,0.08082896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873931,0.008496595,0.00019115371,0.0016438891,0.0020839227,0.000010971553,0.000007716183,0.000052112482,0.00012054772],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972845,0.0002280487,0.000806375,0.0004963133,0.0001228366,0.0010619439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714184,0.00029336204,0.00096878636,0.0006543592,0.000044421176,0.00089721294],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00098647,0.00034893712,0.0006224952,0.00048461012,0.0016059742,0.00020575589,0.0015408756,0.00012695251,0.0007311159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013430312,0.00032332397,0.00035839138,0.00021262342,0.0010036846,0.00064298534,0.000118977696,0.0005831791,0.00036077635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043827586,0.000063605294,0.8020819,0.0000033278686,0.00065903424,0.000005887716,0.07078616,0.005751232,0.0000048686493,0.0948194,0.001646314,0.024134433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041668516,0.00013457713,0.97382516,0.00013860641,0.00010368805,0.00008303035,0.016052166,0.00027657213,0.000030106967,0.0059827557,0.002379096,0.0005775738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9151688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72048736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19468144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017134888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022955637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010315612","doi":"10.1257/aer.103.1.438","title":"Children's Resources in Collective Households: Identification, Estimation, and an Application to Child Poverty in Malawi","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":293,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Economics; Clothing; Estimation; Consumption (sociology); Identification (biology); Household income; Demographic economics; Private good; Engel curve; Labour economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Geography; Public good; Microeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.00966670968582522,"score_gpt":0.275175782116559,"score_spread":0.2655090724307338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010315612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890393,0.0019077235,0.0003083543,0.003417546,0.000039522492,0.0018449749,0.000014243715,0.000036134727,0.0033922063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783481,0.017651778,0.0005946334,0.0028450985,0.00005918138,0.00036875744,0.000016849466,0.000013782647,0.00010181907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987332,0.00019767418,0.00041135543,0.00037408923,0.000073472285,0.00021021545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931186,0.000052752614,0.00021812778,0.000263073,0.00003479309,0.00011937528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005845112,0.00011032897,0.0003008333,0.00009975811,0.00014037905,0.000087721746,0.00023177441,0.00003181952,0.000023270355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010220553,0.00011718132,0.000024804414,0.00049970165,0.00017336784,0.0003559557,0.000027533095,0.00007671136,0.00010606321],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003207903,0.00007428584,0.8730691,0.000056733694,0.00001227414,1.4381803e-7,0.009072558,0.0005058343,0.0000047685076,0.0022386052,0.0016446932,0.11331778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098667755,0.000022479615,0.99310595,0.000099346056,0.0000075705943,6.8775705e-7,0.0017936932,0.0007915385,5.013848e-7,0.00097141427,0.0029529035,0.00015526968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025375178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012267031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12003682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032980798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009759544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9811149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010392029","doi":"10.1007/s11150-005-6695-1","title":"Combining Stated and Revealed Preference Data to Construct an Empirical Examination of Intrahousehold Bargaining","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Economics; Bargaining power; Microeconomics; Consumption (sociology); Construct (python library); Revealed preference; Econometrics; Aggregate (composite); Computer science","score_opus":0.1569246611593818,"score_gpt":0.3213782689395091,"score_spread":0.1644536077801273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010392029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939209,0.0022785175,0.000054264732,0.00018893021,0.000104824794,0.00045489223,0.00031513444,0.00001758149,0.0026649465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98271185,0.014661582,0.0022443149,0.0002682259,0.000037153874,0.0000033992017,0.000033166092,0.000015823674,0.000024466352],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998407,0.0003002134,0.0007184897,0.0002715356,0.00012168015,0.00018106161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835473,0.00018667716,0.0005705462,0.0007098869,0.00010505358,0.00007310083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002023421,0.00011823029,0.00048168216,0.000062406405,0.00009762309,0.000019235637,0.00080265495,0.00007318164,0.0000051501934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002973562,0.00010401607,0.000047286674,0.0002316548,0.00030710673,0.00025825258,0.00024367412,0.00009718705,3.1222334e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008867873,0.0010128475,0.6437239,0.010085458,0.00034406167,0.0000026797154,0.020956635,0.0041258642,0.0031196314,0.24692827,0.004573952,0.06503799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015921555,0.00039007879,0.9570129,0.008104811,0.00045512852,0.000007845459,0.007042403,0.0047279107,0.000533289,0.010297351,0.00888793,0.0009481901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065669883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061365124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.313289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004456367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019457488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42416522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010732054","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.02.001","title":"Breaking the cycle? The effect of education on welfare receipt among children of welfare recipients","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Graduation (instrument); Welfare; Endogeneity; Economics; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010691734521931543,"score_gpt":0.2649600069954881,"score_spread":0.25426827247355654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010732054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9806754,0.000098325385,0.000042082243,0.005026246,0.0015424187,0.00021610761,0.000009673831,0.000004896953,0.012384863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991065,0.00019734424,0.00005300393,0.000097235374,0.00045833693,0.000001481422,0.0000034457858,0.000012490432,0.0000701218],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984731,0.00030099007,0.00063212216,0.00010996026,0.0002270849,0.0002567507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784046,0.000301422,0.0012412725,0.0002497915,0.00025983955,0.00010721722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054503796,0.00011195609,0.0002564632,0.00017555691,0.0004400676,0.00008474297,0.00070490246,0.00011896095,0.000036061243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047068103,0.000069452624,0.00019238125,0.0002570535,0.00025601327,0.00033365347,0.000041825584,0.00029117987,0.0000012633905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003498373,0.00008043645,0.92073685,0.00000765615,0.00010695639,2.2005268e-7,0.004009296,0.0003000553,0.0000039305833,0.026659794,0.00020643754,0.047853366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029397305,0.00017330344,0.98503953,0.00002906622,0.0000389822,0.0000057543684,0.008681791,0.00003458112,0.000032865308,0.00051523995,0.0050796554,0.000075244774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064414926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001495917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064302675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024710255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023047572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33846888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013238662","doi":"10.1007/s00181-010-0387-2","title":"An analysis of the impact of the self-sufficiency project on wages","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Empirical Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Wage; Economics; Welfare; Demographic economics; Treatment and control groups; Percentage point; Randomized experiment; Work (physics); Labour economics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029221598776911564,"score_gpt":0.35047111505201906,"score_spread":0.3212495162751075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013238662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.983887,0.0000036756621,0.000008226376,0.00038252736,0.00030186927,0.00018001467,0.000059525242,0.000016256481,0.015160871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955636,0.000028124383,0.000092236405,0.00015378316,0.000071251015,0.0000024634824,0.0000018729534,0.0000066109437,0.00008730516],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906516,0.00015421968,0.00025500395,0.00018987634,0.0001249456,0.00021080399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998974,0.00014737017,0.00021141997,0.0005401365,0.00006677294,0.000060301947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055747456,0.000096100026,0.00023138776,0.00008771267,0.00023760597,0.000032236443,0.0007443892,0.00012562756,0.00004510151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014081685,0.000053072767,0.00040834324,0.00074974075,0.00033228428,0.000075774886,0.000053259013,0.00020014787,0.000002075264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061473424,0.00031737186,0.96590894,0.000002010675,0.000164179,5.1551083e-8,0.014981101,0.004630619,0.00011516538,0.013421617,0.00017268074,0.00028011942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007692701,0.00007076886,0.9767809,0.0000011256778,0.000117644406,9.359782e-8,0.0025456687,0.01888642,0.000027861357,0.00061207067,0.00079912937,0.00008138865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028936935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00651834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015669318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010350641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006868839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43744183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013802913","doi":"","title":"La théorie des modèles non coopératifs d'offre de travail et ses applications empiriques","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Identifiability; Economics; Testability; Mathematics; Econometrics; Statistics","score_opus":0.037357270083738195,"score_gpt":0.34416134407192717,"score_spread":0.306804073988189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013802913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63299686,0.0009198094,0.0011936232,0.0012480941,0.0002977849,0.0015640638,0.0003072793,0.00010183794,0.36137065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8556226,0.124803044,0.0058828476,0.00021796221,0.00049665564,0.00096693274,0.00013579098,0.00011039085,0.011763774],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994116,0.0016390517,0.000885056,0.0012932835,0.00048266206,0.0015839423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962773,0.0014602488,0.00028498482,0.0010373454,0.00038600035,0.0005541409],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005013112,0.00055190915,0.0007371773,0.00036480214,0.00096228096,0.0005200962,0.0014887553,0.0013042815,0.000099452904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041079454,0.00065198814,0.00030197584,0.0005469124,0.0037239399,0.00033366773,0.00063747034,0.002459649,0.00004708856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097253,0.0014777608,0.11387821,0.0009795654,0.00039754866,0.00006750121,0.091802135,0.13400146,0.00037851752,0.27690133,0.00012761667,0.37989107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017796595,0.00036102856,0.2519314,0.00117616,0.00010046131,0.00003942432,0.1543513,0.019367322,0.00013398928,0.3432417,0.22500503,0.0025125437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004537902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030192563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37737852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038414283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006545193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016711156","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00223.x","title":"Child Care Subsidies and Employment Behavior Among Very‐Low‐Income Populations in Three States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Subsidy; Welfare; Quarter (Canadian coin); Earnings; Welfare reform; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economics; Work (physics); Spell; Child care; Income Support; Single mothers; Psychology; Finance; Medicine; Sociology; Accounting","score_opus":0.09718968068876964,"score_gpt":0.45433444096140524,"score_spread":0.3571447602726356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016711156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92471236,0.066537365,0.0000022473198,0.0010392753,0.000033841698,0.0008282504,0.000059825594,0.000015782303,0.006771035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9061654,0.09328035,0.00006753668,0.000038813523,0.00014521624,0.00008667458,0.00003447312,0.000011474932,0.00017001895],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794483,0.0003555587,0.0003451686,0.00020207939,0.00067388354,0.00047845475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992488,0.00011517256,0.00006191657,0.0002274791,0.00024691992,0.00009971704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012122716,0.00009861311,0.00027474287,0.000298457,0.00037394374,0.00004424853,0.00024170263,0.00006604069,0.00002118088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022137526,0.000089537396,0.00006166896,0.0010096297,0.0004898718,0.000120386314,0.00010874259,0.00021082773,0.000005585336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012151951,0.000052492356,0.9726058,0.0009904192,0.0000031952395,0.0000029964208,0.0029653816,0.000004898109,0.000004149947,0.020939039,0.00012533717,0.00230507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011741033,0.000028403565,0.991173,0.0015967917,0.000010365976,3.4396274e-7,0.0030368622,0.000007189074,0.000002867089,0.0023327505,0.0016032131,0.000090780966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15675871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2041256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04736689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002446717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025269622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8488565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017731054","doi":"10.3386/w10769","title":"Social Networks and Trade Liberalization","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; International economics; Free trade; Liberalization; International trade; Market economy","score_opus":0.2965597112640887,"score_gpt":0.5094873212530854,"score_spread":0.21292760998899668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017731054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004668178,0.0013698647,0.00009046877,0.0033184092,0.00084706076,0.00061018555,0.000073043346,0.000032413867,0.98899037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973823,0.011413591,0.000089897716,0.000060904327,0.0039177164,0.000038320966,0.0005807706,0.000040673993,0.010035141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969707,0.00026914995,0.00043928673,0.0003665205,0.0015399622,0.0004143492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835813,0.00037642775,0.0002187645,0.00009630284,0.00083730277,0.00011304895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048974794,0.0001401295,0.0003179796,0.0003920727,0.0006126188,0.0001242474,0.0003137092,0.00067800377,0.00011530668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045650956,0.0001615828,0.000102494414,0.00024604486,0.0006868941,0.00016202024,0.00007327344,0.0005457127,0.000009057243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011967321,0.000049829956,0.0035642157,0.00007323795,0.000090657624,0.0000015901082,0.0025011515,0.0021003177,0.000001805699,0.93758136,0.05290955,0.0011143298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007037804,0.00006944378,0.026611764,0.00009649171,0.00003208635,0.0000050407657,0.002002822,0.0015307711,0.0000015045388,0.82311416,0.1453789,0.00045326864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006678737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026220775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9789552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023615377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008102324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019277124","doi":"10.1257/aer.104.5.354","title":"Labor Supply and Household Dynamics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Welfare; Dimension (graph theory); Dynamics (music); Affect (linguistics); Labour supply; Household income; British Household Panel Survey; Labour economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.015656699069991443,"score_gpt":0.26988535912413736,"score_spread":0.2542286600541459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019277124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8551599,0.032486193,0.00053160294,0.0132080875,0.0007811977,0.0008315304,0.0001542687,0.0002267015,0.09662052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5948842,0.39447838,0.0009554021,0.008524447,0.00020658493,0.000023301027,0.000016796615,0.000026153599,0.0008846831],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988889,0.00019042342,0.00026668934,0.00027758212,0.000073496645,0.00030289404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921364,0.00012107,0.00019348944,0.0002813795,0.000020839303,0.00016961222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006933067,0.00012990861,0.00041781663,0.000032578464,0.00017172235,0.000052872656,0.00024324065,0.000032353062,0.00005465305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009054799,0.00012945887,0.00006659488,0.0001349705,0.00053279876,0.000120111734,0.000041534917,0.00008782453,0.000101806305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022711426,0.000025453028,0.37736762,0.00027811524,0.00003978406,0.0000011589278,0.0011070047,0.0000152497205,0.0000017194986,0.16879326,0.008264721,0.44410366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015049148,0.000062766536,0.112668306,0.0002002766,0.00006192713,0.0000029261419,0.0020699427,0.00065353105,2.0506907e-7,0.0010503364,0.8827241,0.00035517034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032743674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042332113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8744594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016166501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012266201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.527918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020474949","doi":"10.1007/s00148-012-0426-8","title":"Working parents and total factor productivity growth","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Total factor productivity; Economics; Workforce; Current Population Survey; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Social policy; Growth accounting; Population; Economic growth; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.04137518826517744,"score_gpt":0.27952584824367777,"score_spread":0.23815065997850032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020474949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969857,0.00012379841,0.00017733058,0.00021194761,0.0019366911,0.00005595051,0.0000023649877,0.0000058401392,0.0005004209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799806,0.00017311401,0.0005952503,0.000027957047,0.0011165125,3.0178194e-7,0.0000017170756,0.0000061003575,0.00008098177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938506,0.000059694998,0.00024655173,0.00006189999,0.00007928747,0.00016752281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994088,0.000033344622,0.00032548714,0.000045963647,0.000058996917,0.00012740743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005143011,0.000057568763,0.00012731594,0.00006466862,0.00016242369,0.00005603086,0.000059315797,0.000056889457,0.00000986234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012698743,0.00005710611,0.00004198073,0.000050942395,0.000032654112,0.00070879766,0.0000148754525,0.00009348043,0.0000017111502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052231453,0.000026235168,0.9881758,0.0000022128124,0.000011789217,1.0850891e-7,0.0043363045,0.00008075786,0.000007763709,0.004880818,0.000013828665,0.0024591633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012431086,0.000011353713,0.99530077,0.00000542866,0.000010091626,0.0000051525035,0.0018859138,0.00010116569,0.0000028700158,0.0017307644,0.0007538381,0.00006832794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016775756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023008994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071249874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014172807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037761456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23287195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021398266","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2012-029","title":"Le soutien financier à la garde d'enfants : les effets sur le travail des femmes, le revenu des familles et les finances publiques","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03478084794560738,"score_gpt":0.27053485608559413,"score_spread":0.23575400813998676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021398266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.743288,0.015627673,0.00033093555,0.055738803,0.00063875713,0.00036476497,0.0007772986,0.00015037479,0.18308342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9267249,0.005619298,0.00063062145,0.0026891856,0.00075653364,0.000055008608,0.000080488564,0.00009607534,0.06334786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99392366,0.0017538889,0.00058878056,0.0008042723,0.00044732713,0.0024820722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655664,0.00040649902,0.0002714062,0.0006045535,0.000544627,0.001616279],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023610329,0.00058482226,0.0006674548,0.0007358821,0.0029407085,0.0009648625,0.0012765883,0.0008564986,0.00004012519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028673976,0.00067406276,0.0002929589,0.0013361126,0.0043526907,0.0014087511,0.00012516756,0.0005968718,0.00005170171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040088244,0.00014626754,0.04902973,0.00013985246,0.000067345514,0.000014680122,0.019489197,0.000015081894,0.000016634154,0.6294262,0.04126316,0.26038784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051847304,0.000061672,0.33975142,0.00011805578,0.000017380946,0.000012358427,0.0057868687,0.00008351538,0.000009797949,0.021501672,0.63158065,0.00055812724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97207075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97755504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6079245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006817452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040122848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022993772","doi":"10.7202/013038ar","title":"Effets redistributifs d’un régime d’allocation universelle : une simulation pour le Québec","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02058832849311163,"score_gpt":0.2415874795148078,"score_spread":0.22099915102169618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022993772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9034769,0.0009528919,0.025427787,0.01762202,0.00119836,0.0004782661,0.00015670786,0.00016357134,0.0505235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94784194,0.0001778202,0.00074217917,0.00038081952,0.00094525935,0.000012131785,0.00025832094,0.000039323113,0.049602196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976673,0.0004654759,0.0005697967,0.0005382753,0.00014289671,0.000616253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825007,0.0006018442,0.00033358944,0.00037703407,0.0002455543,0.00019189237],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059665536,0.000331479,0.000364383,0.00008747325,0.0007006782,0.00012117725,0.0003525967,0.00053668895,0.00029190225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001201141,0.00041002315,0.00018699636,0.00052897027,0.00042153604,0.0005714674,0.000062389525,0.0002632786,0.00036778767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051693776,0.0006537266,0.01153192,0.00007549028,0.000109381916,0.000015350903,0.018301759,0.1005006,0.000563177,0.85173094,0.0028961294,0.013569826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002769608,0.00014503257,0.10166178,0.00010596285,0.00021462706,0.0000058673454,0.021798663,0.14983362,0.0007156614,0.11547679,0.60587823,0.0013941502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48395297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13689248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73625416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011292108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002043777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024256270","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-4085.2005.00299.x","title":"Causal effect of early initiation on adolescent smoking patterns","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Youth smoking; Addiction; Psychology; Margin (machine learning); Demography; Demographic economics; Medicine; Economics; Political science; Psychiatry; Public health; Tobacco control; Sociology","score_opus":0.08260427635331775,"score_gpt":0.21951135466546864,"score_spread":0.13690707831215088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024256270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948595,0.00007488465,0.000050281807,0.00096616475,0.0014491117,0.00022881098,0.00014571875,0.0000057455213,0.0022197713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99789554,0.00013921162,0.00005610147,0.00051633705,0.0012284382,0.000004709028,0.000008732269,0.000032573353,0.00011834996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820656,0.00019833684,0.0006933821,0.00022565042,0.000008065623,0.00066800177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974549,0.00019607872,0.0006307157,0.00022741393,0.00018384295,0.0013070797],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012259252,0.00021054505,0.00047780067,0.00056650164,0.000248601,0.00009823508,0.00044891424,0.00021774418,0.00012925448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021551081,0.0002486727,0.0001994902,0.00011104623,0.00015238895,0.00038687745,0.000009657026,0.00036022093,0.0000099441695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009855231,0.000023664203,0.78235763,0.00005933088,0.00014490438,0.000068531306,0.015559347,0.009247998,0.000012153218,0.1829642,0.00026610523,0.00919755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006705414,0.005844469,0.8781949,0.0015191003,0.0004677924,0.0002033906,0.013236751,0.0029545028,0.00091904995,0.033193357,0.05415443,0.0026068268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2463815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9880196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74163806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029462588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022337395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026245338","doi":"10.1086/342997","title":"Before and After TANF: The Economic Well‐Being of Women Leaving Welfare","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":181,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Earnings; Welfare; Quarter (Canadian coin); Survey of Income and Program Participation; Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Welfare reform","score_opus":0.014346344072754032,"score_gpt":0.26165836991678054,"score_spread":0.2473120258440265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026245338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8799263,0.050739277,0.0000042940815,0.03275364,0.0003153907,0.00065850315,0.000014688821,0.000051139854,0.03553675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94196564,0.0532201,0.000030646883,0.00412411,0.00029298186,0.000042950218,0.0000018925439,0.000014624595,0.00030705685],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988463,0.00019094972,0.00025732134,0.00016996416,0.00016532053,0.00037015937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995491,0.00002953729,0.00013714208,0.00013741139,0.00006318665,0.00008363985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007629711,0.00011471439,0.00030701744,0.00001660729,0.0006119736,0.000041398976,0.00026211157,0.00008735609,0.0008657464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002325462,0.000091651505,0.00008405217,0.00024129474,0.00012819057,0.00013389456,0.00007391528,0.0001173391,0.00006202074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067919646,0.0000577833,0.05345059,0.0070250216,0.00014199236,0.0000056724834,0.6937165,0.0000026096714,0.0000050922326,0.117709525,0.0007295368,0.12714885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031716842,0.000038321607,0.112375,0.0009463853,0.00021256256,0.0000019388285,0.08138223,0.00012167986,3.6347524e-7,0.0070834947,0.7970462,0.00047468027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001450943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008603045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7963166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028571815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048578404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94793165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027042234","doi":"10.1086/599281","title":"Accounting for Racial Differences in Marriage and Employment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Racial differences; Race (biology); Population; Labour economics; Demographic economics; White (mutation); Racial group; Black women; Sociology; Demography; Ethnic group; Biology","score_opus":0.02406240937660464,"score_gpt":0.28131319499873714,"score_spread":0.2572507856221325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027042234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966011,0.00027073815,0.00013172155,0.0015771625,0.00051722495,0.0001108565,0.000013256953,0.000004279335,0.0007736831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960219,0.0014542898,0.0014010585,0.00047444328,0.00054365094,0.0000010980294,5.415471e-7,0.000004974715,0.00009804131],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992183,0.00003555027,0.0003763332,0.00009206622,0.00006885093,0.00020893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993782,0.0001167482,0.00028871797,0.00004736672,0.00008903978,0.00007990632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082853786,0.0000755598,0.00023042878,0.00010501673,0.00013338643,0.0001222824,0.00016043476,0.00007653028,0.000008741172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119241224,0.000072056646,0.00005197384,0.000072353614,0.00004994112,0.00030518117,0.0000105454155,0.00010322131,5.1642064e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001212781,0.0001379254,0.8837175,0.000011411365,0.00003823257,0.0000071733425,0.029518023,0.000110162706,0.00011325348,0.05968997,0.00019527924,0.026339844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011715216,0.00020240033,0.94285274,0.000026918839,0.000022491238,0.0000030346923,0.0125897275,0.00045018757,0.000010693484,0.031348277,0.011142318,0.00017969967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000648592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001733707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05913528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011606782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001973488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29383847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028884096","doi":"10.1007/s11205-006-9002-5","title":"When Twenty-Four Hours is not Enough: Time Poverty of Working Parents","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Indicators Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":179,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Goods and services; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Time-use survey; Basic needs; Measuring poverty; Order (exchange); Social exclusion; Quality of Life Research; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Medicine; Sociology; Public health; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.0981956230707363,"score_gpt":0.3707359405124512,"score_spread":0.27254031744171486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028884096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89815,0.00013568909,0.000022092609,0.0024884902,0.00028929973,0.00038434312,0.00008232003,0.00006901561,0.0983787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907675,0.000107712454,0.00012816355,0.00022313456,0.0009803147,0.000018612862,0.000024927109,0.000032181957,0.0077174595],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481475,0.0008274999,0.0003738018,0.00040187105,0.00246292,0.0011191784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988259,0.00026653515,0.00017911174,0.00023479186,0.00029221672,0.00020145252],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028195474,0.00015906485,0.0003074567,0.00048785086,0.00164221,0.00014693449,0.00087036565,0.00039031645,0.0005041566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021490567,0.00016515306,0.00017258445,0.0016418536,0.0010329201,0.00014753871,0.00020775385,0.00060575956,0.00021907131],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005442538,0.0003825863,0.79759216,0.00002877187,0.00009648326,0.0000142163435,0.080594994,0.0000024237543,0.0005621526,0.02203304,0.09198235,0.006656401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014438983,0.00015427018,0.7179815,0.000102764396,0.000059429345,6.032366e-7,0.061325386,0.00006819786,0.00077700574,0.037643977,0.17953645,0.00090650795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009291632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086935685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092617445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041646996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008136478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030469410","doi":"10.1002/pam.1025","title":"Moving Up, Moving Out, or Going Nowhere? A Study of the Employment Patterns of Young Women and the Implications for Welfare Mothers","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Welfare; National Longitudinal Surveys; Welfare reform; Welfare system; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Longitudinal data; Single mothers; Economics; Public assistance; Public policy; Psychology; Sociology; Economic growth; Demography","score_opus":0.02487727975704034,"score_gpt":0.3229179691457291,"score_spread":0.2980406893886888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030469410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897851,0.000072559946,0.004600935,0.004496063,0.000052597064,0.00041058645,0.000010492738,0.0000025551071,0.0005691608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970479,0.0013785542,0.000100071724,0.00014511457,0.000066417655,0.000020152649,2.3052394e-7,0.000006043205,0.0012355164],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883187,0.00014813099,0.00045377942,0.00010962382,0.00026515446,0.00019142914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897105,0.00009610174,0.00056132424,0.0001883807,0.00012367687,0.000059455542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001202934,0.00008698701,0.00030415683,0.0002543078,0.00042858682,0.00006574155,0.00027520186,0.000023080294,0.00000829373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006608196,0.000047765207,0.00015862656,0.0005548621,0.000086091335,0.00008238342,0.00010564305,0.000056425997,2.6599924e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010094011,0.00023489939,0.7930287,0.000062550906,0.003262895,0.0000011134061,0.17651154,0.0009467192,0.000020262733,0.018477209,0.000049034006,0.0073041245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012890318,0.00009629428,0.68107426,0.00002235655,0.0011480417,9.797419e-7,0.31350097,0.000631076,6.902004e-7,0.0009859691,0.0011793273,0.00007097423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040550856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017764967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13698943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010229819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034069883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031751920","doi":"","title":"Minimum Income Proposal in Québec","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Social exclusion; Order (exchange); Poverty rate; Income Support; Public economics; Economics; Business; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.018855024801558068,"score_gpt":0.23634815014676908,"score_spread":0.217493125345211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031751920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.935692,0.00069182104,0.00007809012,0.0004077797,0.00043418558,0.0004093002,0.00016061927,0.000065638844,0.06206057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99097353,0.0015700315,0.00068633666,0.000035198787,0.00006642757,7.174049e-7,0.0000534006,0.000011660857,0.006602709],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981331,0.00023203022,0.00031819163,0.00056918955,0.00036675698,0.00038069114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854904,0.00010621119,0.00027592946,0.0007184585,0.00011877949,0.00023158173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042779747,0.00018869556,0.00033563242,0.0001560668,0.00057968183,0.000037178197,0.0008942208,0.00016742262,0.000081340586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007284769,0.00021022193,0.000053170595,0.00021376162,0.0007551825,0.00079132756,0.00045839557,0.00016353035,0.000010481148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002701119,0.0004731175,0.96693635,0.00007469622,0.00018398196,0.0007596027,0.0138356285,0.0000030070319,0.0001693639,0.006427718,0.0072666598,0.0035997436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032133204,0.00024434016,0.82749015,0.00014525258,0.0002877799,0.00003095886,0.039811317,0.00022297192,0.000044706365,0.0014698894,0.12624152,0.00079779205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57801044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68621254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13944621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032411845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006334554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85726017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032594490","doi":"10.1006/redy.2002.0190","title":"Why Do Women Wait? Matching, Wage Inequality, and the Incentives for Fertility Delay","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Dynamics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; Incentive; Labour economics; Matching (statistics); Inequality; Wage; Investment (military); Wage inequality; Demographic economics; Population; Microeconomics; Demography; Medicine; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.02729938663854981,"score_gpt":0.2966074947763076,"score_spread":0.2693081081377578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032594490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9344702,0.043522794,0.0021557815,0.004092494,0.0005109175,0.0017094028,0.00028578876,0.000042275147,0.013210358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7961181,0.2004681,0.00047027157,0.0023024369,0.00007477244,0.000089000634,0.00001891411,0.0000187382,0.00043967043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983753,0.00032441528,0.00057299004,0.00027538135,0.00010807509,0.000343847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876523,0.00041089018,0.00032180647,0.00033352297,0.00006797741,0.000100554935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029315264,0.00015602077,0.0005440102,0.00003124475,0.0002876699,0.000067417815,0.00039836427,0.00008147491,0.00013599468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019747249,0.0001204698,0.00016168563,0.0000866426,0.00052139896,0.00019244895,0.00010343685,0.000106507425,0.000009262859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070255606,0.00017174099,0.021046942,0.0050158384,0.00022410188,7.601609e-7,0.034596037,0.000057160873,0.0000012835807,0.89686984,0.0021540846,0.039791957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0077089947,0.00029669554,0.037874497,0.004639366,0.00060382014,0.000007654006,0.058671333,0.16808768,9.846235e-7,0.4389557,0.28092498,0.0022282882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006505302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017640061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45791414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003568835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060509137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49126157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W203387114","doi":"10.3233/wor-2012-1317","title":"Using multiple stakeholders to define a successful return to work: A concept mapping approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Work","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Relevance (law); Outcome (game theory); Knowledge management; Work (physics); Psychology; Order (exchange); Process management; Applied psychology; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.15060371947710555,"score_gpt":0.30892299932471573,"score_spread":0.15831927984761018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W203387114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91988367,0.00038063957,0.065971315,0.000485948,0.0009390474,0.00058160466,0.000009199122,0.0001262269,0.011622344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94308543,0.0000062448376,0.054310597,0.00095130276,0.00061724917,0.000025379735,0.0000074113955,0.000026390291,0.0009700124],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794495,0.00015464146,0.00022949802,0.00031031604,0.00041108744,0.0009495142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998939,0.00010957688,0.00007026535,0.00027561106,0.000084342726,0.00052119745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007197254,0.00017520983,0.00022717245,0.00011690219,0.0005731001,0.00012682298,0.0003450419,0.00014449925,0.00004751746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025449198,0.00018026962,0.000074428885,0.0018953084,0.00010836555,0.00019383739,0.00010694874,0.00017801377,0.000055235192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022344366,0.00008472699,0.83502674,0.000008603869,0.00002191578,0.0000015526981,0.15583736,0.001658076,0.00007566698,0.0015244136,0.002627221,0.0031113576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001123301,0.00005117628,0.39798054,0.000286092,0.00007628849,0.0000025732643,0.3809817,0.0008880284,0.000028575916,0.00026983683,0.21665701,0.0016548675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012027106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000340202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43704623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022487681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009850174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7351182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034392644","doi":"10.7202/602253ar","title":"Les impôts sur le revenu et l’offre de travail des femmes mariées : une revue de la littérature","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04979846509403413,"score_gpt":0.28775914596307967,"score_spread":0.23796068086904554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034392644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.921209,0.013722378,0.0007509284,0.027643552,0.00042051388,0.00030331174,0.00016929462,0.00013857821,0.03564248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93720955,0.0154721225,0.0042672325,0.003920958,0.00095081487,0.00002057614,0.000037336915,0.00005256191,0.03806882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961347,0.001649946,0.00051607884,0.00056794786,0.00010068027,0.00103063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803495,0.0007431188,0.00024884456,0.00042910088,0.0001349752,0.00040902678],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022109337,0.00044160994,0.0005563378,0.00008970952,0.00058476167,0.0003376827,0.0006134257,0.0011378673,0.00008167673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047713632,0.00050015276,0.00029642932,0.0005549903,0.00091250695,0.0005412018,0.000058869387,0.00080687366,0.0000274694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004715661,0.0004776231,0.03753342,0.00020824568,0.000105988394,0.000064071806,0.106744476,0.00037323713,0.0010566467,0.6897124,0.0042748637,0.15940188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069021946,0.00017839932,0.5764871,0.00030787315,0.00008850725,0.00006266709,0.017865362,0.00031493907,0.00023471557,0.23209241,0.17094164,0.00073617196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056073956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05360383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53895366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006558139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014370787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034462009","doi":"10.1016/j.red.2006.12.003","title":"Class, gender and marriage","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Dynamics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Economics; Neoclassical economics; Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02379937593106783,"score_gpt":0.30537643846888585,"score_spread":0.281577062537818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034462009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31753036,0.08010694,0.003990266,0.00072620955,0.0015632885,0.0009497428,0.00012393158,0.00008726137,0.594922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57300746,0.42152563,0.0022180735,0.0015304764,0.00027209963,0.0000056780523,0.00004517345,0.00003116302,0.0013642265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988352,0.00006763831,0.0004615766,0.0002198639,0.00010503202,0.00031066948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999229,0.0001312501,0.00021302799,0.00023471852,0.00004895073,0.00014306273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019929404,0.00012213289,0.00034466977,0.000057258618,0.00012354278,0.000020836953,0.00021914154,0.0001038239,0.00011529254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008605638,0.00012749253,0.00009834376,0.00009362652,0.00022270907,0.00012680699,0.000052472395,0.00009894259,0.000033007178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003939501,0.00002987275,0.05225858,0.0017600752,0.0000488189,0.0000033402737,0.00095565326,0.000009396144,0.000004839687,0.9264209,0.0010115419,0.017493002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017300353,0.00016411534,0.33463335,0.0038540785,0.0005342096,0.000032818676,0.023497159,0.014510188,0.0000049983337,0.06448186,0.5543801,0.0021770743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002508446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025725192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8619391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028487912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001835789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5198995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034892152","doi":"10.1007/s13524-012-0144-6","title":"Marital Sorting and Parental Wealth","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; University of Chicago; Booth School of Business, University of Chicago; Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, University of Michigan; University of Michigan; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Marriage market; Sorting; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Spouse; Wealth distribution; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Population; Econometrics; Demography; Mathematics; Inequality; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.02623137141459164,"score_gpt":0.2654202508082342,"score_spread":0.23918887939364258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034892152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8827199,0.00028361604,0.00012473828,0.000052939547,0.00029753844,0.00009119288,0.000006520098,0.000073966105,0.11634964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790144,0.00026954125,0.0014795422,0.00015828019,0.00009019514,0.0000039222746,0.00000384271,0.0000070699293,0.000086147666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922216,0.000056230612,0.00012017663,0.00016079709,0.00015413541,0.000286507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996768,0.000022465063,0.000050811454,0.000081033104,0.00002864368,0.00014019854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027175128,0.00007177826,0.000086143526,0.00008437751,0.00039266405,0.000033598397,0.000108818866,0.00006842484,0.000039950304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020289928,0.00007195267,0.000057433135,0.00028317317,0.0002356523,0.00011221634,0.000029816118,0.00008267023,0.0000064125866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024316496,0.000025275873,0.94703394,0.000004093331,0.000010172584,0.0000026297664,0.014808356,3.835679e-8,0.0000072515577,0.0353571,0.0001311304,0.0026175638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011335212,0.000026213927,0.95789057,0.00000453599,0.000010788263,9.049027e-7,0.02925912,0.000021534808,0.0000017466531,0.011037198,0.0015232256,0.000110789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018934268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017673696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116263494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008637605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003473135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3020094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035235135","doi":"10.1177/036319900102600203","title":"Marriage in 1901 Canada: An Ecological Perspective","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family History","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Perspective (graphical); Variation (astronomy); Regional variation; Geography; Sample (material); Demography; Marriage market; Population; Demographic economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03830520394343613,"score_gpt":0.2780134888358874,"score_spread":0.23970828489245127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035235135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8625066,0.0023304583,0.000039713665,0.00045113306,0.0020430535,0.00006618368,0.0000025779937,0.000009187159,0.13255104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952417,0.00093293074,0.00027345112,0.0013817503,0.00049752963,0.0000011985038,5.184549e-7,0.000008973475,0.0016619549],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835575,0.00030936947,0.00034473054,0.00014239833,0.0005271833,0.00032054307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900204,0.0000939656,0.00023170213,0.00010886664,0.00031051642,0.00025291805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095809187,0.000103254475,0.0002520289,0.00015871924,0.00014167784,0.000012346021,0.00035011754,0.00012406246,0.00016198703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024230729,0.00009729293,0.00007759471,0.00018811766,0.00018736038,0.00025129764,0.000016013739,0.0003901321,0.0000031795446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036694788,0.0022175726,0.60109484,0.000016932632,0.00013297987,0.0068749874,0.16858925,0.0009086285,0.0013670715,0.045833334,0.16770811,0.0048893257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037518685,0.00011905248,0.7381092,0.0000076321385,0.000011245201,0.0000139430695,0.07999862,0.000031202817,1.4022727e-7,0.0008412767,0.18037157,0.00012097217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4859248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90200305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41607824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009655482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046604946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036076192","doi":"10.1007/s00148-014-0528-6","title":"Compensating for unequal parental investments in schooling","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Consumption (sociology); Demographic economics; Redistribution (election); Investment (military); Multiplicative function; Econometrics; Survey data collection; Labour economics; China; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03934528047955961,"score_gpt":0.30902254478741487,"score_spread":0.26967726430785527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036076192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99591696,0.000017830618,0.0022960852,0.00016404195,0.00077902095,0.00009481635,0.0000035950998,0.000004488497,0.00072313106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930886,0.00003494692,0.006218024,0.00019188397,0.00042877026,0.0000010068761,0.000009401711,0.000007259373,0.000020119734],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991642,0.00007548857,0.0004752721,0.00006895939,0.00006888794,0.00014714277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992733,0.00010344997,0.0004394469,0.000044943026,0.0000635443,0.00007529193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010835673,0.000054595454,0.00015699527,0.00011129465,0.0001416458,0.00005602796,0.00010562032,0.00005858148,0.0000049166033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002675391,0.000059887196,0.000060908853,0.000053550077,0.000020588725,0.00031933884,0.000009325611,0.00008601282,0.0000016810355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010685542,0.000020994883,0.90600574,0.000004327298,0.000007732204,1.4733274e-7,0.0023956425,0.03317939,0.000007365275,0.056315813,0.00002086961,0.0020313004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011308508,0.00005851045,0.8607266,0.000029577564,0.000012692172,0.0000012750207,0.00826228,0.08429033,0.0000025133165,0.043129906,0.0022205168,0.00013496088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042819662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018015964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051110946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025977142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006873837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24421291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037720024","doi":"10.1007/bf03186773","title":"Women and the reform of the welfare system: An introduction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gender Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fell; Quarter (Canadian coin); Welfare; Welfare reform; Welfare system; Demographic economics; Economics; Economic welfare; Development economics; Labour economics; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.014517844677735816,"score_gpt":0.2522456428816157,"score_spread":0.2377277982038799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037720024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639387,0.00070720754,0.000026686463,0.0069571123,0.0006069383,0.00021010151,0.0000066191487,0.000047505073,0.027499143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996944,0.000067995876,0.000057784662,0.00004073189,0.00081388204,0.00001171595,0.0000026560472,0.0000061635474,0.0020550566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905705,0.0002059929,0.0001421844,0.00014293985,0.00025865145,0.00019316308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954885,0.000010250348,0.000073616924,0.00025872813,0.00007935119,0.000029228444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075574016,0.000067644374,0.000115497336,0.000020689746,0.00057198864,0.000049606926,0.00021118282,0.00005783092,0.000018170605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014181038,0.000036296286,0.000028850627,0.0001720434,0.00037692272,0.00010883065,0.00003865184,0.00006332515,0.000001767328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017237666,0.00002391914,0.00792755,0.000042704152,0.000018387509,2.6610797e-7,0.10358547,0.0000341306,0.000063929605,0.88723856,0.0006109196,0.0004368978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004198429,0.00002035373,0.13607697,0.0000040498244,0.00002305789,0.0000025528598,0.78176886,0.00012883627,0.000038317736,0.013529656,0.06787041,0.00011707193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008573571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019118185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8737089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013084918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029193317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037896601","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2012.08.012","title":"On the expenditure-dependence of children’s resource shares","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Engel curve; Resource (disambiguation); Identification (biology); Shadow (psychology); Shadow price; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Member states; Econometrics; Resource allocation; Public economics; Microeconomics; Aggregate expenditure; International trade; Computer science; Mathematics; European union","score_opus":0.016858228066500953,"score_gpt":0.2338126190372705,"score_spread":0.21695439097076955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037896601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804502,0.000087264154,0.000054841606,0.00538352,0.00042963063,0.0001548164,0.000029819239,0.000024786343,0.013385136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992141,0.00007079524,0.00007291337,0.0070668715,0.00044945508,0.000008689509,0.000006939674,0.000012942565,0.00017041144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999126,0.00010468191,0.00016756372,0.0001496615,0.00010766855,0.00034437902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926585,0.00024331525,0.00012267574,0.000272104,0.000009238983,0.000086802276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000587607,0.0000983234,0.00011714611,0.00004326759,0.0002671444,0.000042919823,0.0004523457,0.000066076966,0.00018396387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000068752095,0.000081881764,0.00007504212,0.000049075916,0.00020995966,0.00016030982,0.000044369703,0.00014049289,0.00008383315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027863422,0.00012952252,0.39149842,0.000006601482,0.000112215035,8.290899e-7,0.05488452,0.0015021897,0.0005732041,0.48004863,0.07042886,0.00078717317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084698724,0.000078355486,0.8437215,0.000048233942,0.00006254074,0.0000053314957,0.034546565,0.00021671598,0.0011779465,0.0049580326,0.11321548,0.0011223158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044953264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019101278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4750906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009250648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003147529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33390412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038664329","doi":"10.1111/j.1752-1726.2008.01321.x","title":"Alleinerziehende Mütter, <i>Workfare</i> und prekäre Beschäftigungsverhältnisse: Zeit für ein kanadisches Grundeinkommen?","year":2009,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Internationale Revue für Soziale Sicherheit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Workfare; Political science; Humanities; Art; Law","score_opus":0.02962049812035069,"score_gpt":0.3168309423489925,"score_spread":0.28721044422864184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038664329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4228884,0.10178907,0.009165477,0.103473894,0.028834006,0.004779509,0.0020743285,0.0014983912,0.3254969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85365486,0.0155131295,0.0038020336,0.0067514484,0.0124809835,0.00012091207,0.001035803,0.0002398428,0.10640096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99249804,0.00061530236,0.001629112,0.0017371958,0.0017387577,0.0017815924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956155,0.0005784965,0.00089880906,0.001175628,0.00083435164,0.00089721323],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010970215,0.0011197699,0.0011092232,0.00044455356,0.0010787171,0.0009092056,0.0025357124,0.0010380105,0.0013573878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053814444,0.0012898414,0.0008152137,0.0011844499,0.00062545756,0.0010299566,0.00031391694,0.0013100399,0.0017792596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063568284,0.0066216798,0.11204735,0.0009918459,0.008665247,0.0011322624,0.094256945,0.005349433,0.0050279917,0.46003368,0.22589128,0.07934659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024117357,0.0004658138,0.031053482,0.0009103799,0.0009652482,0.000016806714,0.0045138677,0.004734422,0.00015438675,0.018517094,0.93395495,0.0023018378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002454976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039836694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70806366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010330887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000910633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039370491","doi":"10.7202/050584ar","title":"Gender Based Differences in Promotions of Clerical Workers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constant (computer programming); Psychology; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Business; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.06343790477262626,"score_gpt":0.2895654842426257,"score_spread":0.22612757946999942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039370491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.958776,0.00011261372,0.0030488959,0.002305581,0.00010154908,0.00020458765,0.000012181469,0.000041399246,0.035397172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99635786,0.00004142932,0.0021187966,0.000033866494,0.00008575771,0.000013006808,0.000008402766,0.0000060706643,0.0013348268],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989753,0.0001558112,0.00025916062,0.00014547352,0.00024985176,0.00021445322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994482,0.00020424034,0.00007687416,0.00012788283,0.00006806746,0.00007477012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002859837,0.000077375735,0.00012332675,0.00016427448,0.00024505716,0.0000203547,0.00015272055,0.00024874837,0.00027628857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002022633,0.00007668539,0.000046530597,0.0008651769,0.00024286978,0.00012492515,0.000014892863,0.0002533411,0.00002121866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002295734,0.0001682277,0.97076964,7.584157e-7,0.000008937995,4.6142358e-7,0.006763705,0.002473958,0.0000069760167,0.016062912,0.00065027515,0.00309182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035191662,0.000020179781,0.95633227,0.000028888626,0.000018414896,1.6709166e-7,0.025991082,0.0062261554,0.000009749722,0.0009889291,0.009876884,0.0001553626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043431608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009207572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037581824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010314447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005425264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31271395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W204069431","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511615863.015","title":"Married Households and Gross Household Product","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Production (economics); Gross domestic product; National accounts; Product (mathematics); Gross value added; Capital (architecture); Labour economics; Value (mathematics); Demographic economics; Agricultural economics; Geography; Economic growth; Economy; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.03659023010938842,"score_gpt":0.2156672399031444,"score_spread":0.179077009793756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W204069431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057397466,0.00040926042,0.00008980341,0.00005505043,0.0007539653,0.00065357564,0.0004856642,0.0002805467,0.9915324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00845436,0.0014971261,0.000116827825,0.0002390271,0.0002767084,9.2644285e-7,0.000027736913,0.00007849981,0.9893088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997877,0.00011981207,0.00020153384,0.0007762646,0.00048345086,0.0005419584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860066,0.00005929047,0.00021770434,0.00058004796,0.00017120951,0.00037110838],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032682266,0.0004334821,0.00046308516,0.00013846079,0.0008784862,0.00014040332,0.00053901144,0.00055617,0.000004317137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026278456,0.0005393153,0.0001642309,0.000022352786,0.0010337059,0.00015021327,0.0002309203,0.00053434883,0.00000506331],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003015185,0.000012148484,0.00016973057,0.00006390726,0.00009946881,0.00015979524,0.001114857,0.0000022097997,0.000013890728,0.9556534,0.042348377,0.00033201074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049875525,0.000028239332,0.0003734451,0.000054529562,0.00018951236,0.000006903724,0.0007872671,0.0000032608048,0.000012116062,0.000064180684,0.9973544,0.0006273804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012245239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010154863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9555893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028365335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029099474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041864533","doi":"10.1300/j070v10n02_02","title":"Incest and Women of Color: A Study of Experiences and Disclosure","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Sexual Abuse","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Christian Studies; University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Women of color; Psychology; Self-disclosure; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Sexual abuse; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Injury prevention; Developmental psychology; Medical emergency; Medicine; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.020689168596940036,"score_gpt":0.2699315475940406,"score_spread":0.24924237899710056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041864533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99808365,0.0007627505,0.0000032502237,0.00015795842,0.00014869469,0.00011895373,0.0000035530768,0.000003434652,0.00071775663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988906,0.0007859758,0.000047937534,0.000054510198,0.0001114826,0.0000021379049,7.6801236e-8,0.000004507017,0.0001028076],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988135,0.00012897924,0.0003793412,0.000097204174,0.00042211064,0.00015882583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919456,0.00009088357,0.00037475658,0.000075925425,0.0001296614,0.0001341895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051275146,0.00008165989,0.00028950121,0.00008983708,0.00016216244,0.00003122704,0.00017488693,0.000053116197,0.00002854145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074935364,0.00006220869,0.00001863013,0.0002017226,0.00034500766,0.00024162892,0.000025987474,0.0001247025,1.6311412e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027121923,0.00046869795,0.22989793,0.000011225939,0.00004178996,0.000006237107,0.7688261,0.0000096795875,0.000051449388,0.000098810255,0.00007068136,0.0004902719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084081665,0.001508378,0.107288666,0.000020427795,0.000021985623,0.000010234027,0.88953954,0.0000312758,0.0000059314098,0.00007422076,0.00058129115,0.00007722609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013249696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005829679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122609265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021605883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030199959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25367966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042111883","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.02.002","title":"A theory of rational marriage and divorce","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Economics; Incentive; Marriage market; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03942028608249056,"score_gpt":0.26546214114430555,"score_spread":0.22604185506181498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042111883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2826313,0.06962386,0.0002599048,0.0005155955,0.00032199846,0.00036261918,0.000023152888,0.000034668272,0.6462269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5977935,0.3948135,0.0003003387,0.0012815102,0.00021303112,0.0000027876692,0.00000784656,0.000015570127,0.0055719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989734,0.0004973572,0.00023982045,0.00013374793,0.000051637628,0.00010398656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960124,0.00007786369,0.000111134475,0.00013223154,0.000018339015,0.00005919589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013188618,0.000062559084,0.00017015458,0.000017041792,0.00015320053,0.000009312017,0.00014624571,0.000012221711,0.0003306006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008817047,0.000059044956,0.000050911643,0.00003480109,0.00023437654,0.000088771594,0.000037641843,0.00004225352,0.00019027152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011663135,0.00006579125,0.05854914,0.00088484987,0.00009372109,0.000031111176,0.016765602,0.000020042264,0.00003472789,0.84920186,0.02486357,0.04947795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036171888,0.000036380916,0.22876999,0.0004879507,0.000050498755,0.000018092456,0.0010467265,0.00002865275,0.0000015310818,0.0034119033,0.7654814,0.0003051455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023751898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022100601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8457899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024103001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008158514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36198446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042658968","doi":"10.13085/eijtur.2.1.67-87","title":"Methodological issues in the estimation of parental time – Analysis of measures in a Canadian time-use survey","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"electronic International Journal of Time Use Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Time-use survey; Estimation; Statistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Space time; Engineering","score_opus":0.17423797631994054,"score_gpt":0.4662127222308214,"score_spread":0.29197474591088085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042658968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970893,0.00032140408,0.00009670975,0.0017462577,0.000029282306,0.0001402006,0.000045922723,0.00000230825,0.00052860397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980328,0.0005754608,0.00057094055,0.000032798624,0.000072578776,0.0000022024067,0.000037064605,0.0000058838573,0.0006702403],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99275684,0.004190896,0.0005857999,0.0001370094,0.001807195,0.00052227464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955767,0.0027459532,0.00022540276,0.00012448647,0.0012232894,0.000104190745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019578641,0.00008538561,0.0003389298,0.0017009947,0.00008024014,0.00010260933,0.00087661756,0.00011130895,0.00040494927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060531585,0.0000661791,0.00014423365,0.0015563561,0.00021257174,0.0004015472,0.00003758463,0.0005449862,0.00001939878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008079148,0.00096633396,0.8496498,0.0000072628445,0.002101827,0.00008257172,0.029860847,0.09299713,0.002770582,0.0086475685,0.0031787725,0.008929386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056242594,0.00025651848,0.85554093,0.000049974875,0.00007627186,0.000011407202,0.0011453672,0.13851419,0.00012472789,0.0012650511,0.002308381,0.00014477289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33629632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6297184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2934221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012330465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018163527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7246633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042927130","doi":"10.1007/s11150-011-9129-2","title":"Time with sons and daughters","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Consumption (sociology); Quality (philosophy); Economics; Wage; Raising (metalworking); Girl; Time allocation; Demographic economics; Psychology; Labour economics; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04811698425667615,"score_gpt":0.2347307916467698,"score_spread":0.18661380739009364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042927130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9449392,0.010415554,0.000007399199,0.00056654296,0.00012248888,0.00035843678,0.00005148358,0.00001409486,0.043524824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8006128,0.19639778,0.001251803,0.0009882745,0.000038832717,0.0000057854286,0.0000013936228,0.000020695777,0.00068259623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994796,0.000049557668,0.00020521243,0.00010505608,0.00004272069,0.00011787744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940205,0.000027488912,0.00022660616,0.00027088172,0.000027052009,0.00004591951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044949932,0.000069419235,0.00024344854,0.000017898219,0.00007119199,0.0000051364514,0.00030304835,0.00003454382,0.000023988543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002638657,0.00004781099,0.0000703722,0.00006973615,0.00030540608,0.00008053285,0.000052244697,0.000046043835,0.0000025195452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112609865,0.0008409242,0.27604854,0.01201899,0.0010988103,0.0000035362984,0.059447028,0.0002522839,0.00021731926,0.60777646,0.019977098,0.022206426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004627988,0.0012391284,0.33538193,0.033291046,0.0032247168,0.00004823435,0.03314629,0.00097591605,0.0012051397,0.063986026,0.5186741,0.004199549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026811697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021242078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5437904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019644463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009492858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19496755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044236220","doi":"10.3138/cpp.39.3.473","title":"Pourquoi les femmes gagnent-elles moins que les hommes ?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Workforce; Wage; Gender gap; Demographic economics; Political science; Welfare economics; Sociology; Economics; Labour economics; Demography; Economic growth; Census; Population","score_opus":0.04639787262541829,"score_gpt":0.28843146173269946,"score_spread":0.24203358910728118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044236220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6946908,0.0021740983,0.00003292687,0.19407505,0.00048426163,0.0004424306,0.00009723251,0.00016636094,0.10783679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97608757,0.001479468,0.0001700801,0.004867048,0.0011165591,0.0000577623,0.000040040737,0.000035798832,0.016145673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749655,0.00020273356,0.00025054158,0.0003389647,0.0003103615,0.0014008755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743426,0.00013941199,0.0000840069,0.0003702112,0.00025945506,0.0017126497],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032155984,0.00023319125,0.00022670331,0.00072009274,0.0014767749,0.001199517,0.00076056976,0.00030501574,0.0008284782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008286688,0.00024099884,0.00011870805,0.000830761,0.0005170029,0.0010070308,0.0000503435,0.00023976498,0.00036029113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.5131856e-7,0.000031574134,0.12637915,0.0000118811195,0.000038564584,0.000007778231,0.008356747,0.0000028286665,0.000016798347,0.66770184,0.118924685,0.07852768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021422075,0.000019333971,0.18099953,0.000016839138,0.000009378177,0.0000033844983,0.07252812,0.00007742519,0.00000308802,0.014822282,0.7308631,0.00044328632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9638402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9660863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6528796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007339057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008355711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W204497578","doi":"10.7202/600929ar","title":"Équité et efficacité des programmes actuels de sécurité du revenu","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Poverty; Welfare economics; Public economics; Social security; Welfare; Economics; Social Welfare; Work (physics); Political science; Economic growth; Engineering","score_opus":0.03628301855770872,"score_gpt":0.29821635149807885,"score_spread":0.26193333294037013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W204497578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710146,0.00020325732,0.0011495778,0.00391095,0.00018502938,0.00046000333,0.000019255354,0.00030297294,0.02275435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98811895,0.00097435596,0.0034909246,0.004909672,0.0004990689,0.00004007574,0.000018694238,0.000026502501,0.0019217838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997909,0.00042710447,0.00035155512,0.00039504445,0.00012761394,0.00078965304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877465,0.0003088201,0.00014275506,0.0003315692,0.000115136514,0.00032706256],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014367134,0.00025045132,0.00032371606,0.0000854984,0.0005054155,0.00026431683,0.0004992102,0.00030220434,0.000060265604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005077781,0.00025402912,0.00017118962,0.00025755068,0.0003218002,0.0003910971,0.00004358702,0.0002622292,0.000054283493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004506529,0.00040554977,0.047863927,0.000028165872,0.000059810835,0.00002466799,0.08036189,0.000079301586,0.0005021758,0.7989513,0.0010785416,0.070599556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00132415,0.00041074562,0.2387254,0.000110228706,0.00007669244,0.00002301971,0.016208077,0.00022007653,0.00071129645,0.39930734,0.34168714,0.0011958459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015245558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033981802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39964402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021023302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004277458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045437075","doi":"10.2307/3552626","title":"Food Prices and the Timing of Welfare Payments: A Canadian Study","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Welfare; Economics; Business; Agricultural economics; Monetary economics; Public economics; Finance; Market economy","score_opus":0.027290131324128053,"score_gpt":0.27789434417105413,"score_spread":0.2506042128469261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045437075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7326737,0.0003428672,0.0000023504513,0.10974675,0.00013298437,0.000624327,0.00016684119,0.000021927925,0.15628824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960984,0.000053344454,0.000034838777,0.0028596006,0.00032601718,0.000023599618,0.0000054929237,0.000011796375,0.0005869354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850893,0.00014600382,0.00018833141,0.00018455953,0.00022417343,0.0007479906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983432,0.00004470878,0.00006890909,0.00023908488,0.00012299906,0.0011810671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070460036,0.00011151333,0.0001619159,0.0005261468,0.0011385963,0.00019560661,0.0004422605,0.00008500091,0.000088390916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040450518,0.00009261184,0.00003749129,0.0007662384,0.00037574605,0.00023820015,0.000026016247,0.00011451841,0.000006237837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002522657,0.000033331104,0.1092428,0.000006753963,0.00009507247,0.0000035355229,0.07714462,0.0000026780301,2.0827889e-7,0.79344815,0.002170205,0.017850094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096585625,0.00006939947,0.25112182,0.0000052448486,0.000026202077,0.000001953041,0.095881715,0.000116432566,1.6776794e-7,0.0010971861,0.65049565,0.00021835574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99982363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.792351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077331724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006419864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047376069","doi":"10.1080/08873631.2010.519464","title":"The Awkward Spaces of Fathering","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cultural Geography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"King's University College","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Media studies; Sociology; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013347622173392018,"score_gpt":0.2773364039242549,"score_spread":0.2639887817508629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047376069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894304,0.000554692,0.00002665019,0.0009259099,0.0013582363,0.000047952322,0.0000013853619,0.000008006961,0.0076467316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972864,0.0013518485,0.00070656755,0.000039640847,0.00042179722,4.76985e-7,1.9165995e-7,0.0000039254714,0.00018917283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899346,0.00006338372,0.00026723612,0.000053851676,0.0004219257,0.0002001743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989176,0.000089364294,0.00035023436,0.00008851193,0.0004575024,0.000096817595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007549702,0.000072072304,0.0001401106,0.00006107337,0.00040169226,0.000117223826,0.000388581,0.00007111028,0.000021521208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012944179,0.000038685223,0.00026357142,0.00030886856,0.0004039216,0.00022564661,0.000019045472,0.00029614268,0.0000018542859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006155893,0.0001136929,0.85769415,0.000019072573,0.00031102612,0.0000105787585,0.064978845,0.00012272017,0.023672804,0.033555437,0.0019772034,0.017482897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047079482,0.00016408002,0.5406818,0.00003797094,0.00007873931,0.000019327334,0.13465586,0.00002569213,0.00030335994,0.0063400394,0.31700042,0.00022195125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023159798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007475364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3170124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006386933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055505676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30895326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047741303","doi":"10.1007/s00148-007-0147-6","title":"Parental time and working schedules","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Evening; Time allocation; Working hours; Working time; Social policy; Leisure time; Paid work; Time-use survey; Time budget; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Psychology; Economics; Labour economics; Demography; Medicine; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Physical activity","score_opus":0.024690886642814373,"score_gpt":0.2797678610169736,"score_spread":0.2550769743741592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047741303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99667096,0.000120247634,0.0004920111,0.00016345475,0.0004915932,0.000033597244,0.0000013538325,0.000006139664,0.0020206466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99601734,0.00022066214,0.003073799,0.00007961159,0.0004983241,5.632416e-8,0.0000030226008,0.000005464083,0.000101725935],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940777,0.000024934923,0.00031355236,0.00005585021,0.00006788388,0.00013000322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994704,0.000056101595,0.00029689426,0.000037535392,0.000043123135,0.00009591653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009584142,0.000047612273,0.00011020987,0.00009126188,0.00016232797,0.00006123573,0.00007124939,0.00006365963,0.000020973299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052381452,0.00004967849,0.000041959123,0.000050580416,0.00004228069,0.00024141226,0.0000109334405,0.00008050037,0.0000048006204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001166088,0.000013977573,0.9710283,0.0000011263876,0.000013383778,0.000001457061,0.0017871645,0.00062050583,0.000016881553,0.018427711,0.000017785365,0.008060008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021736651,0.000018861541,0.98459387,0.0000106387215,0.000012349829,0.0000067706196,0.0040852344,0.001168777,0.0000026669832,0.0066365562,0.0031679939,0.00007892356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011837801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008956674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013565523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013005422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038523773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.202583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047913789","doi":"10.1086/506486","title":"The Relationship between Women's Education and Marriage Outcomes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Census; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Marital status; Demographic economics; Distribution (mathematics); Marriage market; Consumption (sociology); Labour economics; Demography; Sociology; Population; Geography","score_opus":0.021227228653203773,"score_gpt":0.28479919157280353,"score_spread":0.2635719629195998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047913789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911173,0.000287666,0.000029534851,0.0035532143,0.0007503542,0.000057843674,0.000010161121,0.000005449526,0.004188496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597216,0.00038915154,0.00039412212,0.0001804874,0.00071694446,0.000001843004,0.0000013768054,0.000007167553,0.0023367237],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925065,0.0000867907,0.00035069804,0.00006357744,0.00007740463,0.00017086418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986136,0.00075165427,0.00034835772,0.00008646642,0.000112119524,0.000087794324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010740561,0.000062958716,0.00013806399,0.000060932092,0.00045943106,0.00017035991,0.00016818404,0.00006845576,0.0000065393915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002830014,0.00004869486,0.00004203805,0.00008559004,0.00011210642,0.00025886323,0.000013720478,0.00013665784,0.0000037667799],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024592566,0.000013981161,0.87641144,0.000001545082,0.000010945415,1.7070515e-7,0.0020340919,0.000016731741,5.135502e-7,0.12028334,0.00029946567,0.00092531595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013519387,0.000013881721,0.86304086,0.0000029043892,0.000011434771,0.0000010182715,0.010627343,0.0000035732933,3.0563018e-7,0.094321005,0.031790312,0.00005214558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014879192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006719009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031490847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002339617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049132557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35336187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048498774","doi":"10.7202/601506ar","title":"Récents développements dans l’analyse de l’offre de travail","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04284187012587115,"score_gpt":0.2909350987557054,"score_spread":0.24809322862983424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048498774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9550745,0.0012047885,0.0040072454,0.0067801727,0.0010353435,0.0003407084,0.000110102235,0.0001088931,0.03133824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95353454,0.0036011096,0.0029606228,0.008375766,0.0007554852,0.000017180148,0.0000400092,0.000039448805,0.030675808],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638164,0.00071664527,0.0006491573,0.0006089833,0.00018617451,0.0014574203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982899,0.00015419762,0.00026362244,0.00048036836,0.00010568804,0.0007062411],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001382608,0.0004328036,0.00050360576,0.0001166283,0.0004982469,0.00021373645,0.0007985323,0.000631392,0.00047335724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001623322,0.00050765986,0.00029708276,0.00046708077,0.0003912132,0.00044784663,0.000058411464,0.0004391775,0.0002700957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075032964,0.0013960187,0.38351214,0.000104979816,0.0005433147,0.000109497254,0.2656275,0.0009131993,0.0022446716,0.25634155,0.008096169,0.081035934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013953624,0.00025972267,0.7835699,0.00013160618,0.00033642797,0.000020615013,0.050665535,0.0033324708,0.0005446764,0.0774279,0.08111206,0.001203773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009662524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008326236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4000577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017967257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001167379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049070257","doi":"10.1353/cpp.0.0027","title":"An Analysis of Effective Marginal Tax Rates in Quebec","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Microsimulation; Redistribution (election); Demographic economics; Population; Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Distribution (mathematics); Income tax; Public economics; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.012314174744044941,"score_gpt":0.29054017168546864,"score_spread":0.2782259969414237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049070257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92849123,0.0011877107,0.000048942566,0.035279796,0.00034666108,0.0003113741,0.0006593089,0.000017846376,0.03365713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890572,0.00018644659,0.000061134015,0.002930632,0.00044248742,0.000010000933,0.000093614086,0.000012299446,0.0072061876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971543,0.00059202994,0.00035255877,0.0003934208,0.00027444327,0.0012332555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976766,0.000097518925,0.00014359073,0.00038523375,0.00022884428,0.0014682105],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007367193,0.00023103268,0.0005085495,0.0029603103,0.0002545789,0.00019351042,0.000572354,0.00033913684,0.00024969614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034570735,0.00027689952,0.00019186197,0.00903072,0.00057101366,0.00068616396,0.000011158928,0.00024101124,0.000022570957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003738984,0.00012534585,0.31370354,0.000011357113,0.00022913265,0.000026949028,0.013142004,0.00025354017,0.000015607196,0.5950134,0.0013078942,0.07616753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022457598,0.00009404023,0.9552192,0.000013158776,0.00015929394,6.4143137e-7,0.0055514993,0.004025456,0.0000019067688,0.0034135855,0.03102654,0.0002701099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99938685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6415157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031078816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010636542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051170174","doi":"10.1177/1091142111430682","title":"Sweet and Not-So-Sweet Charity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Public economics; Earnings; Order (exchange); Welfare; Government (linguistics); Private good; Social Welfare; Public good; Microeconomics; Finance; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.05702669095331902,"score_gpt":0.3155892491066585,"score_spread":0.25856255815333945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051170174","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1125997,0.8001403,0.00029749802,0.024457343,0.0012053807,0.00093561667,0.000041834945,0.00015607064,0.06016626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3705416,0.62325555,0.0004442121,0.0044036233,0.00027733325,0.000046746936,0.000008792564,0.000009719402,0.0010124138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984179,0.00018411233,0.00024531735,0.00022335265,0.00029860614,0.0006307073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922913,0.000064560205,0.00012492826,0.00027421478,0.00011278837,0.00019434815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020435278,0.00013547826,0.00032688433,0.000032977157,0.00044232106,0.00009951208,0.00027813026,0.000097973316,0.00011852295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005591287,0.00012232184,0.00007249345,0.00049086154,0.00024871435,0.0006342573,0.000075238604,0.00015301238,0.000115252245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011576255,0.00010986401,0.16399907,0.0013871397,0.000016942939,0.0000015505557,0.0048453757,5.656879e-8,0.0000041498693,0.59936446,0.016842062,0.21342815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006278264,0.0000069230405,0.12086963,0.00023786956,0.000016984191,0.0000018003734,0.00016275681,0.000005874702,3.2111245e-7,0.00033477426,0.87814873,0.00015152904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036149166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022157762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86130667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006234761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021309331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.498814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051243658","doi":"10.3406/oss.2010.1416","title":"L’action publique et la fécondité – Aperçu d’une étude empirique du processus qui régit la première naissance au Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Santé Société et Solidarité","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Fertility; Demographic economics; Wage; Residence; Economics; Family income; Welfare economics; Demography; Sociology; Labour economics; Population; Economic growth","score_opus":0.01547859754575933,"score_gpt":0.32225701636425064,"score_spread":0.3067784188184913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051243658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6228792,0.00005207573,0.00022353072,0.0041382005,0.0014422836,0.0003847202,0.00008394402,0.00021670287,0.37057936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943121,0.00033414608,0.0002846172,0.0024797376,0.0010444848,0.00011051285,0.000069219415,0.00007002211,0.0012951783],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965024,0.0006676215,0.00043771032,0.0006374048,0.0008583571,0.00089650427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997614,0.00077820115,0.0002920313,0.00043799487,0.0004952018,0.00038254328],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019502965,0.00039141346,0.0004310455,0.000088719564,0.0011434961,0.0004160726,0.0007483524,0.00071358564,0.00012842655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093609217,0.00040736631,0.00014687497,0.00062059413,0.0005978995,0.0008050045,0.00013175768,0.0013593803,0.000008765156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007607879,0.0005758019,0.5514165,0.00029810672,0.0002614678,0.00014897269,0.0949824,0.00012676846,0.0027596892,0.32070115,0.017632887,0.011020147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012010257,0.000056759454,0.25082663,0.000067205314,0.00007713744,0.000040649313,0.08101291,0.00020433954,0.00018816444,0.016665256,0.6485488,0.0011111485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54284155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.984837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6309159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035681453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008249247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051322641","doi":"10.1046/j.0013-0133.2003.00168.x","title":"Asking Consumption Questions in General Purpose Surveys","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Banca d'Italia; Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Research Foundation; York University","keywords":"Recall; Consumption (sociology); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03848147131220102,"score_gpt":0.30033695623340084,"score_spread":0.2618554849211998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051322641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97984755,0.00024249448,0.0012179166,0.00034768003,0.0013501267,0.000082758874,0.0000036690121,0.000012130879,0.016895702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99688405,0.0011281309,0.0002451291,0.00009499872,0.00033578757,0.0000025228994,8.990441e-7,0.0000067824726,0.0013017218],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824435,0.0011093691,0.00022416492,0.00008786904,0.00006935185,0.00026492856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960023,0.00010077636,0.000102581,0.000093628296,0.000022681297,0.00008009808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047900896,0.00006375608,0.00009663737,0.000066507746,0.00057005783,0.00014774968,0.0001862711,0.000056336063,0.0002785036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008942704,0.00005409669,0.00004726837,0.00005335476,0.00012661777,0.00018459604,0.000010228181,0.0002503824,0.00011958924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032065668,0.000029573263,0.7413955,0.0000016001006,0.000023454675,0.000007282398,0.011417279,0.0072507435,0.00006267435,0.23691195,0.0005633581,0.0023333884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006840147,0.000019733605,0.8964314,0.000018003217,0.000017578506,0.000080816455,0.007692231,0.0017980222,0.000007724656,0.075268015,0.017734446,0.00024805233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010513706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009733314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16164394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004732646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040221124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5431418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051992571","doi":"10.1023/b:eujp.0000014572.66520.0d","title":"Diffusion Effects in the European Fertility Transition: Historical Evidence from Within a Belgian Town (1846–1910)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flemish; Fertility; Demographic economics; Neighbourhood (mathematics); German; Demography; Quarter (Canadian coin); Working class; Upper class; Geography; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Population; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.028181177468855928,"score_gpt":0.25680076770543137,"score_spread":0.22861959023657544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051992571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9810163,0.0015356898,0.010031569,0.0040708403,0.001159544,0.0002796836,0.0000061633305,0.000055779055,0.0018444515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522716,0.000469266,0.002622921,0.0004885153,0.0010675947,0.0000012473186,0.000013963065,0.000046012232,0.00006332633],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906259,0.00687654,0.0010495498,0.0003549509,0.0006892427,0.0004038184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998141,0.0003353473,0.00064044143,0.00039002358,0.00021389658,0.0002792889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00693535,0.00025314998,0.00034763973,0.0003885493,0.0005347181,0.0001662977,0.00084995164,0.00006177054,0.0000123195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010412311,0.00021107454,0.0003276089,0.0013522016,0.00016210125,0.00049451063,0.00004356599,0.00074664387,0.000015007881],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065352104,0.0016434522,0.6089332,0.00018358519,0.00013816147,0.0069470988,0.338163,0.013772598,0.004743404,0.005270575,0.0010907919,0.018460598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009476995,0.00027284227,0.99219126,0.00053980463,0.000081282305,0.00004072923,0.0022074298,0.000070241505,0.0000034959787,0.0023283507,0.0010792253,0.00023761934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012000016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012591471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38325807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045890966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000709072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86073697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053097067","doi":"10.5539/ass.v10n3p221","title":"Married Women Labor Supply Decision in Malaysia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia","keywords":"Educational attainment; Wage; Labour economics; Economics; Secondary labor market; Demographic economics; Labor relations; Economic growth","score_opus":0.009577643475025861,"score_gpt":0.2798904206684742,"score_spread":0.2703127771934483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053097067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71154803,0.000007766702,0.0002257161,0.0010870182,0.00047263197,0.00013658601,0.000006191938,0.00005133067,0.28646475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975277,0.000022919032,0.0007625136,0.000640435,0.0003363683,0.000018799225,0.0000012705906,0.000009702715,0.0006802643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972422,0.000177308,0.00022955278,0.00042985514,0.00096190214,0.000959149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920267,0.00009870838,0.00008039093,0.00018773164,0.00014429099,0.00028622663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030173834,0.00012416534,0.00019222863,0.00017992606,0.0012278238,0.00023376186,0.000910429,0.0001368019,0.00015148874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064245786,0.00012685399,0.000043040804,0.0024667638,0.0013278684,0.00048352886,0.00011156793,0.00017061422,0.00009324358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019221332,0.000081785576,0.28584146,0.000004740713,0.000002815504,0.000005645632,0.16313657,0.0000041707553,0.00074183877,0.36080042,0.0005302989,0.18883103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029054572,0.000028982657,0.89789534,0.000007868339,0.0000018467243,2.4467138e-7,0.04688326,0.000094619,0.000008011918,0.037200347,0.017392138,0.00019682563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064065313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013346747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6120538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005519157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005978334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9443552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053703207","doi":"10.13085/eijtur.6.2.200-239","title":"Timing and fragmentation of daily working hours arrangements and income inequality – An earnings treatment effects approach with German time use diary data","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"electronic International Journal of Time Use Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; German; Inequality; Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Fragmentation (computing); Economic inequality; Computer science; Mathematics; Geography; Finance","score_opus":0.08112503919154973,"score_gpt":0.39883437852308884,"score_spread":0.3177093393315391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053703207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99834013,0.00022005073,0.00074058824,0.00019064163,0.000031411055,0.00022971208,0.000010247699,0.000008278458,0.00022892046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969001,0.00093415007,0.0016003336,0.000031397365,0.00015998044,0.0000022282936,0.00006492727,0.000011262182,0.0002956195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971042,0.0007945851,0.0002807633,0.00023604635,0.0012051339,0.00037927265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851155,0.0004921887,0.00024932798,0.00017831722,0.0004285403,0.0001400558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031911312,0.00011528828,0.00021174441,0.00033614683,0.00022134009,0.00027473707,0.00045308887,0.00006476932,0.00001311898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002467217,0.000095374526,0.000026991569,0.00022064934,0.00016359305,0.001224713,0.00008806934,0.00034003766,0.00000171663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019327181,0.0017448132,0.8442853,0.000049222257,0.0015746442,0.00013546614,0.053200368,0.000734078,0.0113437455,0.0031948371,0.00023298379,0.081571825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004960818,0.0040292447,0.95610136,0.00046188876,0.00017330468,0.000080908045,0.0029995982,0.027695887,0.00031133683,0.0017061244,0.0010123856,0.0004671269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067769305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011278325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11181608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043948396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003695337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38892603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054178808","doi":"","title":"Individual vs. Parental Consent in Marriage: Implications for Intra-Household Resource Allocation and Growth","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Incentive; Informed consent; Resource allocation; Economics; Demographic economics; Time allocation; Psychology; Economic growth; Microeconomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.019601784731780137,"score_gpt":0.26942522731225077,"score_spread":0.24982344258047062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054178808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808494,0.0011156239,0.0074106334,0.008950799,0.000119561206,0.00038474653,0.000030719817,0.00003932958,0.0010991978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970185,0.0019082942,0.00016207954,0.0002555626,0.00033998213,0.000023004131,0.000035794415,0.00001578135,0.00024099802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800795,0.00013167837,0.00027112977,0.00018573385,0.0001869029,0.0012166111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995128,0.00013769833,0.00012393207,0.00007993048,0.000068986235,0.000076656936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016710066,0.000105024694,0.00012288787,0.00012331197,0.00053831126,0.0001205643,0.0002087605,0.00010174948,0.0000015316624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009584776,0.00010891685,0.00004704349,0.00023122194,0.00014026258,0.00014181146,0.000020706066,0.00053117453,7.555225e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020073921,0.00007153394,0.28532374,0.0000041808034,0.000021246158,3.4075123e-7,0.0013113111,0.000040074698,0.00008199821,0.711147,0.00065394986,0.0013245246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009951732,0.00011532775,0.50448775,0.000010906852,0.000037485985,0.000039090617,0.015339822,0.00004762206,0.000006641115,0.47550017,0.0032291738,0.00019082005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017324726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04277181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23564686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013827794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9746951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055258866","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00810.x","title":"Women and Work in the New Global Political Economy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Studies Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Sociology; Gender studies; Empowerment; Politics; Feminism; Human rights; Transnationalism; Political economy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07036384176942918,"score_gpt":0.36539817847174627,"score_spread":0.2950343367023171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055258866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07501446,0.36698687,0.000049032253,0.10205045,0.0007114743,0.00047781356,0.0000108249615,0.000027847438,0.45467123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5817685,0.39931935,0.00014163386,0.01737299,0.0004242539,0.00004535493,0.0000020760526,0.000003003784,0.0009228174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927896,0.00008220966,0.00015923433,0.00011115177,0.00016833638,0.0002001251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967563,0.0001144332,0.00003204389,0.000057407153,0.000062102496,0.00005839492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035026876,0.00006104212,0.00014557797,0.000010768915,0.00014537285,0.000018875495,0.0002213937,0.000019485831,0.0000472553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000234255,0.000042810418,0.000030657477,0.00015571226,0.00020043357,0.00006567095,0.00005514011,0.000054559565,0.00002195838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039161887,0.000036062906,0.16626163,0.00006466604,0.000089361325,0.0000174317,0.015793214,4.4098667e-7,1.0228051e-8,0.76316065,0.043247264,0.011325329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011110158,0.0000079581105,0.12970671,0.00012221209,0.0000056205213,0.000006568763,0.0057134726,6.603074e-7,5.3267213e-9,0.031187322,0.8330699,0.00006843177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023331013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029784028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7898227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028657357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008426979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17457582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055449421","doi":"10.1353/dem.2003.0024","title":"How an earnings supplement can affect union formation among low-income single mothers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Earnings; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Welfare; Marital status; Economics; Welfare reform; Demography; Labour economics; Population; Psychology; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.01196285132157883,"score_gpt":0.2403952843843287,"score_spread":0.22843243306274985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055449421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885381,0.00003387313,0.005554896,0.00037675205,0.00034270063,0.00032218202,0.000017179736,0.0001220314,0.0046922793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855,0.00004893324,0.0009436039,0.00010327868,0.0000647476,0.000015177984,0.00004956095,0.000017409915,0.0002072754],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984024,0.0004533436,0.00013678847,0.00021169297,0.00037076656,0.00042498767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940014,0.00003694389,0.00011519398,0.00018491084,0.000080293015,0.00018250427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007649337,0.00013725487,0.0001294356,0.00023119658,0.0005296943,0.00021468716,0.0001767175,0.00011196216,0.000031220745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004760887,0.00013911282,0.00011094175,0.00076748943,0.00018091605,0.00050880236,0.000010608166,0.000113790804,0.0000023833372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002579947,0.00008217585,0.9676956,0.000017350332,0.000021742624,0.0000017672725,0.021189159,0.000068859554,0.00037519055,0.009358788,0.00027669448,0.0009101252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007940892,0.00032707263,0.8543236,0.000040972176,0.000050077135,0.0000011778222,0.10407235,0.0005007348,0.00040688628,0.002702957,0.03619033,0.0005897069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011281518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010269365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11337192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088304085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040872423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5730547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056580402","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02260.x","title":"Feature: In‐work Benefit Reform in a Cross‐National Perspective ‐ Introduction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Incentive; Work (physics); Income Support; Poverty; Public economics; Labour economics; Welfare; Cash; Economics; Welfare reform; Tax credit; Perspective (graphical); Labour supply; Earned income tax credit; Income tax; Business; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Finance; Market economy","score_opus":0.013690829295929692,"score_gpt":0.28734392162724365,"score_spread":0.27365309233131396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056580402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9223377,0.00022184393,0.000014432946,0.052809563,0.0008895758,0.000083206425,0.0000026790412,0.000009137661,0.023631863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99517787,0.00031713684,0.00010277501,0.00032039353,0.0027356988,0.0000015416584,0.0000011654722,0.0000043676073,0.0013390725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992429,0.000063985906,0.00017321401,0.0001343372,0.0001312516,0.0002542944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965644,0.00002741398,0.00010852955,0.000076796074,0.000079397025,0.000051412386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015185057,0.00007250679,0.00010529169,0.00011816468,0.00031643274,0.00015790157,0.00024549573,0.00007860376,0.000057910336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057529214,0.00005829588,0.000052025072,0.00016962468,0.00008355517,0.0003246006,0.000011706977,0.00042482457,0.000033326043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015786568,0.00008753764,0.14266221,8.9855394e-7,0.000031447755,0.0000070895676,0.09562421,0.024767661,0.00001163658,0.7295559,0.004069657,0.0030238647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039242863,0.000022681312,0.76545966,0.000005554198,0.0000026520395,0.000018357154,0.027105503,0.00024070907,9.1856384e-7,0.20340024,0.003259003,0.000092264316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008398831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6227975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006319255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003529993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058320709","doi":"10.1111/1540-5982.t01-1-00002","title":"Poverty dynamics: empirical evidence for Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Humanities; Sociology; Political science; Demographic economics; Welfare economics; Demography; Geography; Economics; Art","score_opus":0.2054060436458016,"score_gpt":0.2500611445062126,"score_spread":0.044655100860410996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058320709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836387,0.00045337112,0.0005094027,0.0064471606,0.003961116,0.00037755934,0.00033493715,0.000006095303,0.0042716465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99259424,0.00025318208,0.0010094387,0.0037770674,0.00060832204,0.000015875754,0.000011639396,0.00004695986,0.0016832589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974389,0.00017939504,0.0008092148,0.00036371234,0.0000071827767,0.0012015711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951398,0.0006415986,0.00051417487,0.00033535642,0.00048677754,0.00288231],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001554267,0.00026713815,0.0005595323,0.0003255882,0.00063106033,0.00017951742,0.00073946733,0.00024980117,0.00019732316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021480913,0.00032724885,0.00024334206,0.00018721448,0.00023258195,0.00049650326,0.000008997264,0.0003264515,0.0000041477424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031193318,0.000009344191,0.11554496,0.000029766607,0.00011354492,0.000079801976,0.003606695,0.0021844993,0.0000011357658,0.86506575,0.012558335,0.0007749999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014028671,0.00041593873,0.009694789,0.000174696,0.00015007304,0.00024901016,0.025133744,0.0044745225,0.0000136217795,0.31513426,0.64182204,0.0013344475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9812803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6292637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011545834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041434847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058717161","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2013.06.001","title":"Examining the Influence of Price and Accessibility on Willingness to Shop at Farmers' Markets Among Low-income Eastern North Carolina Women","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; National Cancer Institute; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Residence; Market price; Business; Marketing; Agricultural economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.01796417780652033,"score_gpt":0.2940993883352926,"score_spread":0.27613521052877227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058717161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988541,0.00006656325,0.000009126165,0.0002895195,0.00030169546,0.00037287973,0.0000045055112,0.000004413768,0.000097203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990721,0.00022532103,0.00015900694,0.00015948375,0.00013461363,0.00006729783,0.0000012519401,0.0000049451382,0.00017597838],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897623,0.00013649011,0.00032346684,0.00012398597,0.00028641225,0.00015343375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987977,0.00010798567,0.00030323028,0.00010057423,0.0004911556,0.00019934885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051923253,0.00008211781,0.00014646437,0.00009498104,0.0002523626,0.00007747366,0.00015224256,0.00005706216,0.000033589553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009803373,0.00006241578,0.000025344962,0.00022362253,0.00015383118,0.00039326452,0.000028844925,0.00012011361,0.0000015084091],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014912719,0.000667966,0.98066586,0.000042271648,0.000003935549,3.916534e-7,0.014663846,0.0000059282784,0.00025243292,0.000008814301,0.000022829814,0.0036508136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022563795,0.00009449849,0.9629606,0.00010181423,0.000022248889,0.0000034863351,0.036345307,0.0000071335094,0.000009176454,0.00005966136,0.000101661855,0.00006879937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001655777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010473138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02168146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014970826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013116481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25452417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059803243","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00449.x","title":"Managing Money in Marriage: Multilevel and Cross‐National Effects of the Breadwinner Role","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marriage and the Family","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Multilevel model; Power (physics); Demographic economics; Survey data collection; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.008784481474156591,"score_gpt":0.270423401909896,"score_spread":0.2616389204357394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059803243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989025,0.0019215931,0.00040700161,0.0005735838,0.0005452965,0.0001760954,0.000004248781,0.0000033236931,0.0073438603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788475,0.000819263,0.00016299123,0.0005319976,0.00022572486,0.0000010906533,2.2330075e-7,0.0000073065885,0.0003666299],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985644,0.0002530428,0.0003676347,0.00009658617,0.0005030709,0.00021524502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985904,0.00078190624,0.00028492304,0.000090830945,0.00017630371,0.00007560078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037545837,0.000096244294,0.00021143664,0.00010325119,0.0002712399,0.00007132799,0.0002626878,0.00008391001,0.0000029758614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045868944,0.000056279056,0.000085545435,0.00019035979,0.00044324275,0.00018574449,0.00007421719,0.0002544984,4.5322076e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012416139,0.00032064735,0.75585806,0.00022109714,0.000327964,0.00013632161,0.1167242,0.0006412515,0.007755065,0.07924556,0.0011783,0.03634992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025440506,0.000024314691,0.95580614,0.00007507273,0.000031001397,0.000009931197,0.008484036,0.0004803053,0.000059228045,0.03169853,0.00070505834,0.00008230793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007053511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003842071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19994812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004741009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000105165906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22949934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060842004","doi":"10.2105/ajph.93.3.416","title":"A Balanced Tobacco Control Policy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Public Health","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Stephen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Tobacco control; Control (management); Environmental health; Raising (metalworking); Tobacco use; Tobacco in Alabama; Business; Public economics; Medicine; Tobacco harm reduction; Economics; Public health; Engineering","score_opus":0.029630775638781276,"score_gpt":0.3402910663138698,"score_spread":0.3106602906750885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060842004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85001415,0.0007315353,0.024264468,0.09900784,0.0008728556,0.00022979712,0.000016625941,0.000044272485,0.024818446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838978,0.0011983423,0.0023367782,0.01184444,0.00051440037,0.0000016491538,5.293312e-7,0.000012051572,0.00019402434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667305,0.0013914893,0.00050813676,0.00012102259,0.00053790724,0.0007683899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975554,0.00017431524,0.00078274583,0.00014848622,0.0003982355,0.0009408598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044561373,0.00010523738,0.0004248171,0.00026016773,0.00034899195,0.000096550066,0.0003188604,0.000037213522,0.000052564228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001415095,0.00009318647,0.00011670301,0.0011533067,0.00041412597,0.00025986522,0.0000071325585,0.00025628763,0.0000094844845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016655606,0.00024361823,0.44391686,0.000007287356,0.00010309583,0.000012922565,0.038511798,0.00002607949,0.000012494374,0.28730842,0.0035651028,0.22627567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017733892,0.0013253237,0.173782,0.000021732876,0.000010447945,0.000052848387,0.16619839,0.000018555638,3.255028e-7,0.0022645444,0.6542751,0.00027728794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033319106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005995486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65071005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005624541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008999089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061392756","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.157","title":"Who Stands to Lose from Tax Cuts in Israel?","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.018046450697427115,"score_gpt":0.2494081363275807,"score_spread":0.23136168563015358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061392756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9313218,0.0029227075,0.00004966586,0.042025834,0.0034350953,0.00019933522,0.0003075376,0.0000034051766,0.019734614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97500086,0.00072551344,0.0001746418,0.0058358223,0.0010410217,0.000004927069,0.0000030067094,0.000025712496,0.01718851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776375,0.00031635672,0.00052175194,0.00022792559,0.000231873,0.00093833474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719256,0.00029568287,0.0002509834,0.00026213736,0.00018849243,0.0018101145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002345948,0.00022153709,0.0005668657,0.00020507773,0.000364347,0.0003119758,0.0006370758,0.0002525637,0.00032714478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026824084,0.00019628703,0.00012519966,0.00050447433,0.0009449595,0.00033554225,0.000037444115,0.00094693335,0.000027017219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075365424,0.000032172728,0.04247994,0.000023138171,0.00009878581,0.00030319285,0.20787384,0.000055300712,0.000021609016,0.7436259,0.002214046,0.003196717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033364077,0.00026478618,0.049284544,0.0003556781,0.00008009141,0.000105359875,0.10912426,0.00025544773,0.000005917451,0.39192605,0.44468194,0.000579514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22499026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89767224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6726819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007185939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016071929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80043525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062964913","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0335.2008.00686.x","title":"Redistributive Effects of Transfer Programmes in the United Kingdom","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economica","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; University of Warwick","keywords":"Decile; Redistribution (election); Transfer (computing); Economics; Welfare; Conditional cash transfer; Econometrics; Cash; Demographic economics; Metric (unit); Value (mathematics); Mathematics; Statistics; Macroeconomics; Economic growth; Political science; Computer science; Operations management; Poverty","score_opus":0.029822050134132003,"score_gpt":0.26698861025107007,"score_spread":0.23716656011693807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062964913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99263096,0.000031495336,0.00006967475,0.00038651977,0.00014327283,0.00028812763,0.0000146697785,0.000016885666,0.0064184098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99958605,0.00009022198,0.000051864692,0.00012692399,0.000060871997,0.000018239494,0.000017640128,0.0000041681556,0.000044011573],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993418,0.00014205118,0.0001425143,0.00011094925,0.00006321816,0.00019945901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958277,0.0002276529,0.000025226578,0.00010784793,0.00002381525,0.000032660188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028526693,0.00006021016,0.00011830774,0.000051298073,0.00014594554,0.000012527816,0.00021813896,0.00006447673,0.000010712152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006487909,0.000049129685,0.00004915396,0.0002272908,0.00028298062,0.000054385862,0.000007544733,0.00008772905,0.0000059462086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000509426,0.00037277525,0.42130864,0.000052652038,0.00006996091,0.000031346193,0.2776205,0.00011420296,0.00016870224,0.29746434,0.0016460886,0.0010998301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001441055,0.00017104237,0.8740516,0.000029357137,0.000027313004,0.0000027277913,0.020770691,0.0002640562,0.00037838652,0.0040866854,0.09846696,0.00031012922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028911233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011943568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45274296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005427495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009960597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4370533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065062315","doi":"10.1257/jep.20.3.27","title":"Changes in Labor Force Participation in the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic Perspectives","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":281,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Economics; Labour economics; Social force; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.026345855023827372,"score_gpt":0.3100674629939389,"score_spread":0.28372160797011153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065062315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99045604,0.00042528898,0.000035820398,0.0070381225,0.00010315306,0.000093571565,0.0000041089793,0.000005379196,0.0018384857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979372,0.0014737168,0.000020144103,0.00018838499,0.00024681044,0.0000024470198,0.0000010777246,0.0000055120768,0.00012470518],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990967,0.0003818348,0.00020233593,0.00005497053,0.00008694286,0.00017719621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993623,0.00031024253,0.00017635777,0.00007514915,0.00005714793,0.000018828203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017217238,0.00005792268,0.00010791918,0.0001517424,0.00010448289,0.000042495718,0.0002631963,0.000031323845,0.000015419886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005063163,0.00003629611,0.000026652813,0.00021263307,0.00015775536,0.00014430484,0.000009685044,0.00014177235,0.0000023647822],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008418884,0.00017247324,0.1782156,0.00000312066,0.000023718492,0.0000052110677,0.69974196,0.030521167,0.00012124307,0.09043726,0.00050532364,0.00016871425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027639102,0.00004545436,0.46636122,0.0000078624125,0.000010034509,0.0000016178374,0.50888556,0.0014935385,0.000006764877,0.021997383,0.0008623118,0.000051888383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008073078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11758615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28814563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027868975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093697876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065805300","doi":"10.1177/0193841x06293411","title":"Does Receiving an Earnings Supplement Affect Union Formation? Estimating Effects for Program Participants Using Propensity Score Matching","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Propensity score matching; Receipt; Earnings; Matching (statistics); Disadvantaged; Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Demographic economics; Random assignment; Average treatment effect; Psychology; Economics; Econometrics; Medicine; Accounting; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.13375186684758997,"score_gpt":0.42968491301862294,"score_spread":0.295933046171033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065805300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9271009,0.0018580318,0.061220545,0.00055012415,0.00059826206,0.008306177,0.00000671827,0.00016598399,0.00019327526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91992295,0.0004073479,0.078158915,0.00017793331,0.00031182452,0.0007438354,0.00021637206,0.000022048893,0.000038796657],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966604,0.0014616837,0.0004892058,0.00029085533,0.0006599687,0.00043790054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986667,0.0001811265,0.00043342015,0.00019093849,0.00043943367,0.000088381814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0110513205,0.00015562186,0.0003067193,0.00005026462,0.0009921237,0.0001824539,0.00014602668,0.000059536425,0.00004394076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010393461,0.000115058276,0.000084314364,0.00031533767,0.000046828834,0.0007478382,0.00003129736,0.00009276564,0.000005804692],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024586525,0.0009662483,0.30116588,0.026228214,0.000110480316,0.0000035344517,0.03651638,0.023901196,0.0019608438,0.011553559,0.0014906701,0.5960784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001755582,0.00043288778,0.33287528,0.015312954,0.0012317265,0.0000030840336,0.0025944293,0.6151956,0.00013768388,0.023500439,0.0058712084,0.0010891639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081436767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001430289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59498924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028773426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020797554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76307136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067385268","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-9713.2013.00650.x","title":"Hey Baby, What's Your Sign? How Children Born Under Sagittarius are Denied Day Care","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Significance","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sign (mathematics); Sagittarius; Pediatrics; Medicine; Psychology; Demography; Family medicine; Sociology; Physics; Astronomy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019447781302274772,"score_gpt":0.25598273919332665,"score_spread":0.2365349578910519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067385268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729755,0.0036994452,0.0016119682,0.0058138263,0.001834928,0.0015607007,0.000087373344,0.0003660733,0.012050166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937011,0.00080321013,0.00040344612,0.0010199244,0.00062356656,0.000095494084,0.000052056785,0.00004556232,0.0032556588],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731636,0.00029827675,0.00023634627,0.00063769676,0.00066635426,0.00084494776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984008,0.00011662508,0.00019885188,0.0005240492,0.00042433242,0.00033532752],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029720966,0.00029971224,0.00032403533,0.00008018878,0.00074602,0.0010471257,0.00074042886,0.0002629764,0.00022760527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011597667,0.00029640767,0.00013206048,0.0004910838,0.0003922894,0.0011653428,0.00007356156,0.00031488235,0.0002626849],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030432277,0.0004007351,0.71102136,0.00011132292,0.00038764492,0.00003941423,0.17541689,0.0011421355,0.003968937,0.032608792,0.03522048,0.03965188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039412297,0.00004201215,0.746783,0.000046615358,0.00003833246,8.849517e-7,0.24302778,0.000033687018,0.00008638841,0.0028367995,0.0061533926,0.00055696873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075090127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007707941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06761088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029146366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040010246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068744844","doi":"10.1007/s001480100109","title":"Optimal food allocation in a slave economy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Allotment; Productivity; Economics; Property rights; Consumption (sociology); Order (exchange); Value (mathematics); Resource productivity; Resource allocation; Microeconomics; Market economy; Economic growth","score_opus":0.02583528258083292,"score_gpt":0.26961704493811783,"score_spread":0.2437817623572849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068744844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98871475,0.000064535394,0.0015925887,0.00034058045,0.0005297502,0.000089994755,0.0000017876442,0.000004801085,0.0086612245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958718,0.00016457759,0.003548032,0.00012904701,0.00017050277,0.0000012477125,0.0000037724515,0.000007837996,0.00010318052],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990961,0.00010281106,0.00050327997,0.00008677217,0.000053938104,0.00015713154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992926,0.00004511053,0.0004154913,0.0000729131,0.00009233084,0.00008153991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091214443,0.00006729055,0.00016053369,0.00017400221,0.00009291915,0.00006336988,0.00010806053,0.00009035517,0.000034950175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001278157,0.00007673759,0.00007043116,0.00009818282,0.000027235254,0.0005329526,0.0000051245547,0.000112304944,0.0000058445703],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013657604,0.00007572953,0.5683902,0.000004953259,0.00002975901,0.0000012758503,0.006935855,0.09617242,0.0000053253893,0.32725698,0.00007892844,0.0010349506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025307403,0.00031464582,0.7866026,0.000032745604,0.00004861335,0.000028047778,0.03204308,0.012944585,0.000028035362,0.10928622,0.055596095,0.0005446027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001369188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021198767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21821243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004003249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021163476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3129268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071113445","doi":"10.1177/1091142113515053","title":"Fiscal Incidence When Family Structure Matters","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Subsidy; Allowance (engineering); Incidence (geometry); Population; Welfare; Public economics; Order (exchange); Tax incidence; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Demography; Finance; Operations management","score_opus":0.023291559062155357,"score_gpt":0.2771567131425435,"score_spread":0.2538651540803881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071113445","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16566648,0.41163352,0.01720203,0.2866437,0.0049816323,0.0032240043,0.00016041349,0.00078323577,0.109704964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5522228,0.35800037,0.005866952,0.0796503,0.0007116976,0.00008896806,0.000046849666,0.00004889977,0.0033631886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979797,0.00031404552,0.00032199128,0.00035558254,0.00047476316,0.00055393047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990237,0.000094329094,0.00017158815,0.00043054429,0.00014489284,0.00013496424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011077329,0.00017474826,0.00037886,0.00004492892,0.00034603124,0.00012640342,0.0007132381,0.00011747093,0.00018351107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057810405,0.00015479383,0.000108925815,0.00048999506,0.00022598641,0.0004255178,0.00008019935,0.00021400918,0.00013675303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002146659,0.000059081507,0.045124494,0.0019121678,0.000026112373,0.0000058159435,0.0039651655,0.0000059453046,0.00003673857,0.3405918,0.27337742,0.33489314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007624816,0.000012252492,0.04316177,0.0005299956,0.000016124348,0.0000018312352,0.00015941884,0.000058337257,2.492799e-7,0.0061931415,0.9495819,0.00020873325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003990248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005862027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6762045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009947555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021645555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63123095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071689493","doi":"10.1046/j.1470-6431.2002.00203.x","title":"Do consumption expenditures depend on the household’s relative position in the income distribution?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Economics; Position (finance); Distribution (mathematics); Permanent income hypothesis; Consumer Expenditure Survey; Income distribution; Econometrics; Household income; Demographic economics; Public economics; Macroeconomics; Sociology; Life-cycle hypothesis; Inequality; Aggregate expenditure; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0787162846077214,"score_gpt":0.34944877602414287,"score_spread":0.2707324914164215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071689493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716922,0.0061431825,0.0002528046,0.01749582,0.0016558592,0.00017411464,0.00006997585,0.000010411934,0.002505634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900591,0.009089514,0.000026393564,0.00046118096,0.00025691369,0.000008325138,0.0000032370517,0.000004192476,0.0000911796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981918,0.00043284742,0.00033382166,0.000092421054,0.0008089302,0.00014019103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828476,0.00096613576,0.0002887419,0.00008555587,0.0003474923,0.000027338237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009889149,0.00009713776,0.00013507136,0.00009314875,0.0003585383,0.00011392913,0.0004560402,0.000049923416,0.000053048418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046667398,0.00005569266,0.0000889523,0.000090325506,0.00031394904,0.0003058492,0.00003460742,0.00030162573,0.000020147281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016436662,0.00046043968,0.36345655,0.0000074155773,0.0013100014,0.0002548316,0.10686257,0.00034410277,0.0000357718,0.5022844,0.022039002,0.0027805485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017730632,0.00022100222,0.7944654,0.00039203218,0.00014426002,0.00018728813,0.11242333,0.00007843272,0.00003782449,0.050468363,0.03945483,0.00035417711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005668479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043172605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45181605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023427451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031040443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2757623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072637281","doi":"10.1007/s11150-004-5646-6","title":"The Effect of Child Benefit Policies on Fertility and Female Labor Force Participation in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Endogeneity; Economics; Cointegration; Labour economics; Total fertility rate; Labour supply; Demographic economics; Population; Econometrics; Demography; Family planning; Research methodology; Sociology","score_opus":0.020378744492779134,"score_gpt":0.26250480988123936,"score_spread":0.24212606538846024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072637281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98925704,0.008034973,3.0650233e-7,0.0014183767,0.00010548118,0.0003848385,0.000053351094,0.0000032378953,0.0007424254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643485,0.035251416,0.0000053910344,0.0003562141,0.0000098697565,0.000008766104,6.9407383e-7,0.0000070633746,0.00001211596],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922174,0.00009577895,0.000362319,0.00009537147,0.000077164375,0.00014764933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917686,0.00021155363,0.00027743488,0.0002758778,0.000025650788,0.000032630818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008323494,0.00007581421,0.00028902528,0.000014929739,0.000098328,0.0000064320748,0.0002602169,0.000029054247,6.829577e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021130158,0.00004843496,0.000064981155,0.00011599359,0.00014460261,0.00004414862,0.000040024177,0.00006266733,9.249465e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007610048,0.00008014744,0.88906443,0.0030951097,0.0000730284,1.614115e-7,0.002700287,0.018860143,0.00002042246,0.07966819,0.000059242917,0.006302753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032003538,0.0000776906,0.99428934,0.0013372534,0.00004198439,1.0614845e-7,0.00045640644,0.000047329104,0.00068978954,0.0015927232,0.0010585673,0.00008876102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4154606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8452167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4297561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019907436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026085885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5884319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074097612","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00214.x","title":"THE EARLY BIRD GETS THE WORM? BIRTH ORDER EFFECTS IN A DYNAMIC FAMILY MODEL","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Order (exchange); Scope (computer science); Birth order; Overlapping generations model; Work (physics); Labour economics; Population; Medicine","score_opus":0.01730069346963627,"score_gpt":0.2747363820537045,"score_spread":0.25743568858406823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074097612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868425,0.00023384018,0.0004113029,0.0009969829,0.0048604384,0.0004742841,0.000006048899,0.00010183687,0.0060727606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959886,0.00043034652,0.00024140692,0.00070803304,0.0005568864,0.000071684655,0.0000012391101,0.000039539318,0.0019622666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844295,0.00016291089,0.00029502448,0.0003323846,0.00014275634,0.0006239694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998859,0.00045372813,0.00011351398,0.0004366217,0.000037464975,0.00009970019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001347899,0.00018204314,0.00019013908,0.000078305144,0.0008592784,0.00023698236,0.0007980736,0.00020338748,0.000011577696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012098597,0.00012461041,0.000083806495,0.00015170765,0.0007994033,0.00024106116,0.000107575106,0.0005263125,0.0003410711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014215047,0.00024005723,0.2310965,0.00005258306,0.00019693146,0.000029398814,0.34934416,0.0236642,0.0018633072,0.3525776,0.0065258513,0.034267236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010659388,0.00005624219,0.64572,0.000018203684,0.000021900403,0.0000015937044,0.022205068,0.2656852,0.0000038089315,0.04218013,0.022409568,0.00063235295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032828907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08799926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41462347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018976573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044579993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9286424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075002587","doi":"10.1086/498585","title":"Who Marries Whom and Why","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":612,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Marriage market; Legalization; Matching (statistics); Spillover effect; Transferable utility; Economics; Econometrics; Function (biology); Nonparametric statistics; Demographic economics; Demography; Statistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Sociology; Biology; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.012543195560522653,"score_gpt":0.26247015921558864,"score_spread":0.24992696365506598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075002587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6805312,0.0002149787,0.0007136405,0.008627981,0.00025391366,0.000040532013,0.000005630055,0.0000081450935,0.309604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99555606,0.000020551684,0.0004657623,0.0018667548,0.0010872557,4.6128645e-7,3.9254664e-7,0.000005586017,0.0009971657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999124,0.00006397322,0.00029089025,0.000072618415,0.000107963235,0.00034053778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993331,0.0001348888,0.00009811063,0.000053888652,0.00012430981,0.00025573876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003652967,0.00006734291,0.00018426651,0.00006360513,0.00021316687,0.00018391208,0.000116435054,0.000075336444,0.00008089609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007242025,0.000060666815,0.00006800683,0.00004963527,0.0004686,0.00027810968,0.000018428285,0.00013168821,0.000006375244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028656236,0.000018035655,0.09902061,0.0000051134293,0.000008597291,0.000007167527,0.0004891879,0.0000017469298,0.0000022724628,0.8980186,0.0023523015,0.00007352126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031850062,0.000057186968,0.21459293,0.0000130111,0.000022672597,0.000019638419,0.0072677815,0.000043644817,0.0000073864085,0.46534342,0.31219783,0.000116014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009349288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004514555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43267518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091387104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002620789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24739209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077066709","doi":"10.1007/s00148-008-0211-x","title":"Who benefits from paid family leave? Impact of expansions in Canadian paid family leave on maternal employment and transfer income","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Parental leave; Social policy; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Wage; Marital status; Family income; Family Leave; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Work (physics); Transfer (computing); Population; Demography; Sociology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.034575871633452014,"score_gpt":0.27229259111919346,"score_spread":0.23771671948574144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077066709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984772,0.00018666004,0.000047525864,0.00018583746,0.00038930948,0.00014167759,0.00020719755,0.00000528779,0.00035925605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972853,0.0020781315,0.00017176403,0.00019381831,0.0001948536,0.0000011829285,0.000015706726,0.000018614235,0.000040619416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984342,0.000116768395,0.0007665329,0.00016348771,0.00018222188,0.00033677724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905944,0.00008004262,0.00025336354,0.00012431743,0.00010107385,0.00038175713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048830477,0.00016134726,0.00040815191,0.00040121266,0.00021363024,0.000044962228,0.00018090915,0.00016596416,0.00002385595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035548994,0.00015717071,0.00015621794,0.0001242761,0.00007977129,0.0003894476,0.0000109812945,0.00021231185,0.0000028141044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045121593,0.000035843997,0.9708747,0.0000023360485,0.00004129681,0.000008731638,0.0066574663,0.020243546,0.000070384594,0.00093223376,0.000030887873,0.001057453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006766754,0.00016587401,0.9947475,0.000057644957,0.000016083353,0.0000051358898,0.0022214942,0.0009263264,0.000009845726,0.00091636594,0.00010589828,0.0001511167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5485999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51751775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031082137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008860738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056860363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64092356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077299147","doi":"10.1007/s11150-008-9040-7","title":"Marriage market imbalances and labor force participation of Canadian women","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Boom; Economics; Explanatory power; Negative correlation; Positive correlation; Demographic economics; Baby boom; Marriage market; Labour economics; Similarity (geometry); Power (physics); Demography; Population","score_opus":0.03809126849676088,"score_gpt":0.25023104935330753,"score_spread":0.21213978085654667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077299147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.980713,0.008108238,5.51439e-7,0.0004647812,0.00013920164,0.000251635,0.00013911058,0.0000060371303,0.010177449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76329815,0.23591739,0.000092034075,0.00036633655,0.000022653687,0.000007826289,0.0000010127732,0.0000081819335,0.00028640864],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991981,0.00009599734,0.00035562392,0.000101788275,0.000059022354,0.0001894665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992131,0.000072159026,0.00032610033,0.0002330283,0.000054366265,0.00010127406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007742378,0.00006936008,0.0003097878,0.00006532876,0.000089367124,0.0000044630137,0.00026051508,0.000046692607,0.000027971071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015414912,0.00005815345,0.00006518807,0.00020284664,0.00025677576,0.00009073835,0.000030514228,0.000041199517,3.3302592e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028689437,0.00012363499,0.8756573,0.005835203,0.00020012636,0.0000012158273,0.019308655,0.00030675757,0.00009809364,0.08682951,0.008395716,0.003215049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062256696,0.00010890439,0.8698302,0.0020314057,0.00012957104,0.0000028796787,0.0040835575,0.00032117486,0.00019242824,0.007875391,0.114365146,0.00043680708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015309369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037120458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22780915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007468172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031964973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077634312","doi":"10.1007/s11266-011-9207-3","title":"Dispensing Charity: The Deficiencies of an All-or-Nothing Fiscal Concept","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Welfare; Nothing; Order (exchange); Social Welfare; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Law and economics; Economic growth; Law; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.039198833658514246,"score_gpt":0.2996925388603003,"score_spread":0.26049370520178605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077634312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889004,0.00019044726,0.0067787217,0.0015461538,0.0012672702,0.00011672128,0.000053448122,0.000018058332,0.0011287585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949578,0.00037596183,0.0033388853,0.00066792226,0.00041951702,6.694287e-7,0.00001865424,0.000014516041,0.00020605905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998447,0.00014952355,0.0004747076,0.00013981623,0.000596933,0.00019200287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811596,0.00015440838,0.00037793707,0.00012513321,0.0011062494,0.000120322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006439554,0.000117039795,0.00018012174,0.00014891457,0.00045174762,0.00008963695,0.0006547431,0.00008272943,0.00036589877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043975588,0.00008432688,0.000055202243,0.00040472086,0.00052884925,0.00078066374,0.00009689419,0.00022111292,0.0000024589351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013082878,0.0003820477,0.5812848,0.000010658129,0.0003504579,0.00005921171,0.35443878,0.00011464682,0.0011533769,0.059282787,0.000518575,0.0022738385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011971857,0.00053685275,0.7928557,0.00014573574,0.000348831,0.00037569873,0.18675567,0.0026055612,0.0013701299,0.0065579363,0.0067624324,0.0004882789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018566279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017537202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21157087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007753103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031462932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40063348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080157152","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4991.2010.00377.x","title":"THE GROWTH OF FAMILY EARNINGS INEQUALITY IN CANADA, 1980–2005","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Income and Wealth","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Assortative mating; Economics; Inequality; Educational attainment; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Distribution (mathematics); Demography; Sociology; Population; Economic growth","score_opus":0.016471606756277284,"score_gpt":0.29840576659769497,"score_spread":0.2819341598414177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080157152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752626,0.019839488,0.0000055308046,0.0013962025,0.00019269806,0.0002104219,0.000015381971,0.0000037575735,0.0030739496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7795378,0.2198281,0.00006665538,0.00048802464,0.00002886875,0.0000032271194,0.0000015275016,0.000003067161,0.000042757456],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870986,0.00023962537,0.0004290536,0.00010542901,0.00028844824,0.00022761531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913985,0.0002336239,0.00025621144,0.00016003808,0.000113569266,0.00009670907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026554319,0.00006963094,0.00029840763,0.00002400648,0.00014909543,0.0000061911283,0.00022466696,0.000040412586,0.0000072649186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039258317,0.00004795744,0.000034739078,0.00025892607,0.00016317485,0.00004620014,0.000035290006,0.00020117851,6.6997126e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024134815,0.000015355086,0.95091635,0.0019294703,0.000005947251,5.9591537e-7,0.001454737,1.2336642e-7,0.000038901882,0.03879638,0.00028472152,0.0065549756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009120786,0.000013940834,0.98125726,0.00061689503,0.000007148383,2.6210364e-7,0.0017561615,0.000008455655,0.0000023608475,0.0006030391,0.015578118,0.00006517841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90065205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9605595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19998862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006707152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018261581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32395262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080914601","doi":"10.1353/jda.2005.0001","title":"Relative Employment and Earnings of Female Household Heads in Mexico, 1987-1995","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of developing areas","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Wage; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Demography; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.038244619943925584,"score_gpt":0.2862463244164543,"score_spread":0.24800170447252873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080914601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922,0.00047589856,0.004379755,0.001466432,0.00020035026,0.00010807838,0.0000024560345,0.000010511925,0.0011564725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961373,0.0006100172,0.0028098354,0.0002009415,0.00005825473,0.0000011475634,5.075559e-7,0.000011534989,0.00017045107],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986149,0.00017634023,0.00043226997,0.000102867525,0.00042569172,0.00024791673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991499,0.0001445903,0.0003670019,0.000090769245,0.00016015075,0.000087590175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014427439,0.00010721547,0.00024196676,0.0001373031,0.00022710906,0.000025749154,0.00024265535,0.00008562828,0.000003054807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012352839,0.000082938204,0.00005182589,0.00039637552,0.00022942937,0.00018587732,0.000047759913,0.00027231168,0.0000013556257],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036874128,0.00005713228,0.8773968,0.00001556655,0.000055977398,0.00002149991,0.11038483,0.0017898616,0.00007581017,0.009625181,0.000039091876,0.0005013448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000873625,0.00010881985,0.9638599,0.00032792173,0.000026956395,0.000029515006,0.024060115,0.000012510005,0.000069060705,0.008553922,0.0019165921,0.00016102038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012641246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024966595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086463116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024695302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063970726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3382122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082135825","doi":"10.1257/app.1.1.251","title":"The Social Multiplier and Labor Market Participation of Mothers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Applied Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Instrumental variable; Economics; Composition (language); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Geography; Econometrics","score_opus":0.010375625795554991,"score_gpt":0.26655525160031995,"score_spread":0.25617962580476494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082135825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97173524,0.000043823264,0.00007883206,0.0021332938,0.00020235269,0.00013209022,0.000016543096,0.00001339158,0.025644422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962297,0.0021065138,0.0004978876,0.0005705435,0.00037396295,0.0000051916218,0.0000010810049,0.000013054047,0.00020207789],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989278,0.000065003165,0.0004275078,0.00016719016,0.000048139354,0.0003643728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898916,0.00016518419,0.0005637428,0.000111706555,0.00002812908,0.00014207404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008295453,0.000121328856,0.00026107207,0.000051715022,0.00084895955,0.00014488534,0.00024503638,0.000054307056,0.000044875156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019802274,0.000111729845,0.0000692379,0.000058837973,0.0007174864,0.0001330044,0.000019923567,0.00015564312,0.000010653631],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003529744,0.00012674893,0.08618524,0.00000503052,0.0002940051,9.4899156e-7,0.054870937,0.0031750475,0.00014238233,0.41131365,0.0033407083,0.44019234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001127044,0.00014235437,0.8063418,0.0000036769065,0.00006480883,0.0000060456205,0.11481144,0.003279171,0.000029830286,0.042924017,0.030786917,0.00048284544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017653468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050126365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7201566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002539941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020647873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65295964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084259912","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.241","title":"Budget 2010 and the Universal Child Care Benefit: An Inquiry into the Gendered Nature of Childcare in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Child care; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.009506277630801509,"score_gpt":0.22152288642231355,"score_spread":0.21201660879151205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084259912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9356032,0.019697582,0.0000017133702,0.037356757,0.003230438,0.0002792144,0.00013784507,0.0000017600269,0.0036914952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938256,0.002045484,0.000026643625,0.003046402,0.00055074366,0.000003111971,0.0000073400993,0.00002098817,0.0004736922],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800825,0.0004406819,0.0004275381,0.00021075015,0.00026740239,0.0006453575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802625,0.00026964728,0.0003633047,0.00034846217,0.00025824874,0.0007340558],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016168073,0.00023527653,0.0005098913,0.000106805215,0.00085516786,0.00014773117,0.00087992236,0.00029123228,0.00004606933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012099312,0.00014904527,0.00010383432,0.00037909488,0.0028746808,0.00027209494,0.00005737941,0.0018707485,3.1322875e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007489002,0.000007837528,0.017771363,0.000041527954,0.0001013392,0.000050291554,0.5190909,0.00011450197,0.0000012086932,0.4601941,0.00011926034,0.0024327848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036355879,0.000095389696,0.10299015,0.0001390642,0.00011475475,0.00020498896,0.8064742,0.00019036591,0.000001941156,0.053179793,0.032667086,0.00030666852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9556414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4070143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007672513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038080253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086301890","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.2.267","title":"Global Distributive Justice: The Potential for a Feminist Analysis of International Tax Revenue Allocation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Tax revenue; Public economics; Tax reform; Scholarship; Economics; Double taxation; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; Accounting","score_opus":0.015324835057127137,"score_gpt":0.28168090878942564,"score_spread":0.2663560737322985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086301890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.951674,0.00052602374,0.0062268847,0.030639414,0.00093922333,0.00029185085,0.0020630006,0.0000032101525,0.0076363836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99782413,0.00013288461,0.0000708902,0.0010774476,0.00026963864,0.000003537138,0.00002011408,0.000002741136,0.000598643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912274,0.00012376242,0.00026463703,0.00008507471,0.00015426661,0.00024952742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899334,0.00011990194,0.00029922428,0.000097946046,0.0002655504,0.00022404613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014567839,0.00007072602,0.00022382985,0.00007142112,0.00039853886,0.00011726897,0.00037364455,0.000055181637,0.000014173951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002686317,0.000051595216,0.00014989781,0.0003688483,0.0003863343,0.00008658919,0.000008025428,0.00009536408,2.574196e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103905266,0.00002085373,0.005178963,0.000007991559,0.0005927784,0.000009849719,0.039481215,0.00071940187,0.0000035751168,0.9516989,0.000978309,0.0012042811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034163056,0.00034752736,0.29217443,0.00009172361,0.0031284168,0.00006720195,0.16820592,0.005195179,0.0000027758147,0.46170095,0.06527719,0.0003923915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070290365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12954146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48999792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004161918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055335404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086431135","doi":"10.1353/ecf.2000.0059","title":"Impotent Fathers: Patriarchy and Demographic Crisis in the Eighteenth-Century Novel (review)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Power (physics); Estate; History; Sociology; Criticism; Literature; Law; Gender studies; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.016695054170210794,"score_gpt":0.2609268489509003,"score_spread":0.2442317947806895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086431135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6970863,0.2744225,0.00033402108,0.004331549,0.00197311,0.0024450005,0.000115239614,0.0002483864,0.019043908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44946718,0.54866946,0.00014796708,0.0012454829,0.00029627964,0.00006082789,0.000052636922,0.000021476651,0.000038690174],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634486,0.00062007306,0.0006294145,0.00067007524,0.00093850837,0.0007970763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988331,0.00016041692,0.0001799085,0.0005011819,0.00010802427,0.00021737421],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016035712,0.00036510362,0.00038199313,0.0002391765,0.00085414655,0.00015592495,0.00054392364,0.00027629038,0.0004971919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005208103,0.0002834205,0.00026247234,0.0012715427,0.00026936742,0.00044740076,0.000048304435,0.0005112189,0.000052268646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005769647,0.007409459,0.23698041,0.0012314811,0.000685501,0.00013334751,0.11419782,0.00019168695,0.0006711481,0.08270543,0.28314248,0.27207425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016156897,0.0001481663,0.11800165,0.00029050073,0.00022677638,0.000016563721,0.023437683,0.00031525115,0.0000033413617,0.00024334365,0.8550186,0.00068242557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001341749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003861084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5718761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017360167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009697463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086820752","doi":"10.1177/136346150504200413","title":"Book Review: Families, Labour and Love: Family Diversity in a Changing World","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transcultural Psychiatry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies; Anthropology","score_opus":0.017545237273955672,"score_gpt":0.2712483691670513,"score_spread":0.2537031318930956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086820752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5022772,0.42617658,0.000057559162,0.03010715,0.0010911667,0.0007020471,0.000045248646,0.00012946101,0.03941357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54464364,0.29940352,0.0016015337,0.0728815,0.0010140128,0.000011738062,0.000023065086,0.00002845663,0.08039255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849933,0.000113680086,0.0002367344,0.0003106382,0.00032493408,0.00051467767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959326,0.000018203644,0.00005233929,0.00013843799,0.00005024103,0.0001475364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039154498,0.00018322212,0.00025536816,0.00022629176,0.00045025648,0.000040834,0.00026028848,0.000094994655,0.00020523071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008707991,0.0001624664,0.000107124724,0.0012316877,0.00014888293,0.00041247718,0.000044533102,0.00024986625,0.000054393244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069801,0.0003695221,0.45897266,0.0011654553,0.00010606033,0.000009499652,0.19624348,0.00005314316,0.000118701,0.055019367,0.27892068,0.008951619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084102486,0.000019605637,0.3212135,0.00040527497,0.000051291627,0.0000015526156,0.02522852,0.000031951648,5.802773e-7,0.00028432708,0.65152854,0.00039382876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001326945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028496137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37260783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008717882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007469923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087906752","doi":"10.3917/rf.007.0085","title":"Équilibre et déséquilibre des comptes amoureux contemporains : le revenu familial remis en question. l'exemple québécois","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches familiales","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07498604935728216,"score_gpt":0.33968736053082504,"score_spread":0.2647013111735429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087906752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90909153,0.01392332,0.0011949152,0.018957615,0.0053615686,0.00096843275,0.00072340405,0.00054347236,0.04923572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8847292,0.012816268,0.02408312,0.0013182347,0.0024931375,0.000081372855,0.00024458425,0.00020698413,0.07402706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903034,0.004818578,0.0011381612,0.0012848137,0.0009140641,0.0015410014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940634,0.002901547,0.0004687569,0.0011220848,0.0006819025,0.0007623442],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006597157,0.0009326129,0.0010957995,0.00023186662,0.0011386785,0.00032142122,0.001539013,0.0022180127,0.00015269437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003953065,0.0010321896,0.00060465274,0.00127559,0.0042706756,0.0012339519,0.00036642002,0.0026746416,0.00029674615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002280024,0.0020010453,0.22365303,0.0010504425,0.00054234214,0.00011765068,0.20320831,0.0001428611,0.07108225,0.4041613,0.045924217,0.04788854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002144994,0.00043904188,0.19354014,0.0008566995,0.00033216295,0.000056441328,0.0895086,0.0015108921,0.00085257285,0.17871568,0.5294665,0.0025762802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26518452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.392118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48354226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008814588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005232263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088036692","doi":"10.3386/w8845","title":"Subsidizing the Stork: New Evidence on Tax Incentives and Fertility","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Subsidy; Incentive; Stork; Economics; Population; Jurisdiction; Earned income tax credit; Demographic economics; Public economics; Labour economics; Tax credit; Microeconomics; Demography; Political science; Biology; Sociology","score_opus":0.5277710724192765,"score_gpt":0.5322440992549872,"score_spread":0.004473026835710714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088036692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13657992,0.009499558,0.000008904783,0.0052424013,0.001128929,0.0010393499,0.00009141777,0.000025257797,0.8463843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94515103,0.020533778,0.000052547402,0.00003676725,0.000990224,0.0000228885,0.000022404098,0.000017586923,0.033172786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958571,0.0006122466,0.00042883278,0.00049727276,0.002164962,0.00043955081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99495995,0.0031098968,0.00024424514,0.00028813118,0.0012391162,0.00015867205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010338792,0.00015818818,0.00030168486,0.00028866454,0.0007118771,0.00016551076,0.00069795916,0.00032847232,0.0003154194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004970341,0.00013317044,0.0000996586,0.00023611767,0.00093065307,0.00022857415,0.00016228942,0.00076834107,0.000055215867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021780426,0.00023278396,0.10768259,0.00030639698,0.00039284967,0.000007236206,0.015877493,0.00026689575,0.00007245289,0.5764378,0.2814136,0.017092096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006046466,0.00029237778,0.41805992,0.00091228867,0.000051628806,0.000004455592,0.0104968995,0.00065549166,0.000030290701,0.41516772,0.15296091,0.00076336507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02326041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007883944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8132115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021079548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063629956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090465264","doi":"10.1007/s11293-006-9028-8","title":"Age, Retirement, and Expenditure Patterns: An Econometric Study of Older Households","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantic Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Almost ideal demand system; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Public finance; Population; Demographic economics; Goods and services; Retirement age; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Demography; Production (economics); Macroeconomics; Pension; Finance; Economy","score_opus":0.028868959293800314,"score_gpt":0.28168723234488563,"score_spread":0.25281827305108534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090465264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960876,0.00014409167,0.000078633355,0.00005727091,0.00057868124,0.00020182917,0.00000830734,0.00001761355,0.0028259552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984636,0.0004936427,0.000069069145,0.000046704998,0.00065900036,0.000002889143,0.000006419327,0.000016374723,0.0002423416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987115,0.0001500526,0.00046398985,0.00022879736,0.0001298958,0.00031572388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929464,0.000055166678,0.0003049833,0.00017458838,0.000027551645,0.00014306484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007111416,0.00013167367,0.0002701644,0.00018948753,0.00034056872,0.00020245624,0.000275875,0.000088154105,0.0001714132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010199646,0.0001285881,0.000053685922,0.00008337934,0.00008708868,0.00035210035,0.00003664807,0.00017535215,0.0000067981155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042547367,0.00021116578,0.99036175,0.000005914438,0.000037527447,0.000023214754,0.007296863,0.00013783744,0.000006343085,0.0010912867,0.00046753086,0.00035632355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009722209,0.00017281517,0.95975184,0.000011918532,0.000039963,0.000017164297,0.03722041,0.00010787292,0.0000015885813,0.0009543919,0.0005811299,0.00016866575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009940376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016269062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030609882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013143857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009440566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99665254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090752746","doi":"10.1257/mac.5.1.168","title":"Taxes and Time Use: Fiscal Policy in a Household Production Model","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Macroeconomics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Work (physics); Production (economics); Economics; Matching (statistics); Care work; Time-use survey; Labour economics; Public economics; Work time; Business; Demographic economics; Macroeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.01672366719767252,"score_gpt":0.2537615129067672,"score_spread":0.23703784570909467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090752746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99196696,0.000043898955,0.00011957683,0.0049434127,0.00036350015,0.00024996392,0.000041612457,0.000033497516,0.0022375975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99101436,0.0028351718,0.001913612,0.0009573706,0.0006961758,0.000016119666,0.0000026590033,0.000036082343,0.0025284498],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845326,0.0001061485,0.0004799845,0.00033624182,0.000057649686,0.0005667158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990451,0.00007973733,0.0003683164,0.0001877507,0.000023935703,0.00029520298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005086174,0.00018616414,0.000354656,0.00030054862,0.00032412753,0.00047170412,0.0002578759,0.00007702917,0.000054602355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092815186,0.0002090071,0.00007455587,0.00011269844,0.00069269375,0.0012231,0.00006614698,0.00030869193,0.00012805164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051049305,0.00012941689,0.81965953,0.000010111831,0.00012234249,0.000006438884,0.015887195,0.092003375,0.00034034176,0.018083598,0.0127815455,0.04092505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018694274,0.00028423406,0.57505536,0.000047177196,0.00005983284,0.00027678272,0.037538595,0.27765065,0.00002323806,0.084131196,0.021145966,0.0019175458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019874811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044206707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24460419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009235473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004513861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98665196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091056955","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4991.2007.00239.x","title":"FAMILIES, TIME AND MONEY IN CANADA, GERMANY, SWEDEN, THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE UNITED STATES","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Income and Wealth","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Crunch; Economics; Demographic economics; Economic shortage; Work (physics); Labour economics; Work hours; Demography; Working hours; Population; Sociology; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.01849650319889861,"score_gpt":0.291769720181285,"score_spread":0.2732732169823864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091056955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9489268,0.046360854,0.000009048503,0.003523643,0.000045837318,0.00041158826,0.0000236265,0.000006882708,0.0006917159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5511296,0.44468778,0.00002144083,0.0040484043,0.000022551572,0.0000028448155,0.000019039457,0.00000522192,0.00006311802],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998651,0.00036496265,0.00035541056,0.00012912441,0.00023735121,0.00026213948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987456,0.0007568452,0.00015623256,0.0001487917,0.00008424942,0.000108276094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028178554,0.00010588888,0.00030762728,0.00008823467,0.00029835675,0.000022354337,0.00015946069,0.000038420465,0.0000062523372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015167067,0.00005933972,0.000018559362,0.0007340893,0.00040159567,0.000044096152,0.000060444163,0.00015176553,5.5807436e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008277303,0.000069331196,0.85196185,0.0056124167,0.00012537,0.000024459185,0.0340894,0.00003701632,0.000012712031,0.08478262,0.003719925,0.019482136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001044037,0.000040567105,0.83139986,0.002121655,0.00007288422,0.0000065658915,0.013413891,0.0014876653,8.7150914e-7,0.001261566,0.14889914,0.00025129103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9358507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82035047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39832693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008771147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040201686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24198036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091128987","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v4n1p240","title":"Sustainable Rural Development though Women Participation in SMEs Business Growth in Sindh","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Sustainable development; Sustainable growth rate; Business development; Women entrepreneurs; Economic growth; Political science; Marketing; Economics; Entrepreneurship; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.020497054860343228,"score_gpt":0.26428714218115784,"score_spread":0.2437900873208146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091128987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929175,0.00017585962,0.0004314143,0.00024883164,0.00022648012,0.00041915863,1.9269885e-7,0.00001927216,0.00556134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885071,0.00018283256,0.004401152,0.000111334884,0.000072854535,0.00007258183,0.0000024793212,0.000022106939,0.006627569],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961926,0.0002357676,0.001123975,0.00020538151,0.00074839144,0.0014939258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973468,0.0000686446,0.00045254262,0.00010849416,0.0017600358,0.00026347424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004063646,0.00023732362,0.0004328988,0.0008854527,0.0004303736,0.00012390147,0.00045319463,0.00017106887,0.000088095825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058898446,0.00022642103,0.00004089882,0.0019291394,0.00011480882,0.0011259014,0.00014099195,0.00030857263,0.000007255808],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016606878,0.00060723233,0.42718053,0.00019388991,0.000042464897,0.0010900239,0.55076635,0.00014078534,0.000009118384,0.018093139,0.0001215617,0.0015888603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064295204,0.00003037935,0.56618387,0.000049676164,0.00000400961,0.0000030887052,0.42279854,0.00000424298,0.00007962804,0.0035972297,0.0064068455,0.00019953915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017863705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008879692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13900332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004559771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00610524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091531626","doi":"10.1155/2014/357145","title":"Gender Socialization: Differences between Male and Female Youth in India and Associations with Mental Health","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Population Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Centre for Global Health Research; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; David and Lucile Packard Foundation","keywords":"Mental health; Socialization; Psychology; Positive Youth Development; Demography; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.12660387343636406,"score_gpt":0.4276626986664583,"score_spread":0.3010588252300942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091531626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954731,0.00008658848,0.0006651668,0.0022090224,0.00016394116,0.000121119294,0.000037073343,0.0000044629737,0.001239541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986896,0.0002909854,0.00042761074,0.00007698799,0.0003627692,0.0000013424748,0.000049988237,0.0000057430216,0.00009497224],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977162,0.00054460345,0.000309308,0.00011232749,0.001125321,0.00019224091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893904,0.00018913136,0.00022896554,0.00003602546,0.0004882992,0.00011853686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024742472,0.000058084006,0.00014665679,0.00036131503,0.00035991706,0.00017008485,0.00016551274,0.00006387124,0.000021991911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026296676,0.00005150639,0.00001889791,0.00024096272,0.00013974542,0.00027818308,0.000039265462,0.00021275712,7.679119e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000905585,0.00002502438,0.9590423,0.000003537011,0.000025759353,8.643561e-7,0.025072262,0.000011046296,0.0000014632872,0.014236254,0.00003643394,0.0015359896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004535466,0.00006161527,0.9768691,0.000029397852,0.000004009897,0.0000016394188,0.0189278,0.00012775966,3.1409e-7,0.0033359707,0.00013820431,0.000050655064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020617538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022576042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017826777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002698177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021147369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3116769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092471761","doi":"10.1007/s11199-010-9885-0","title":"More on the Gendered Division of Household Labor: A Response to Commentators","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sex Roles","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Psychology; Division (mathematics); Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025839438890183794,"score_gpt":0.2963690296338649,"score_spread":0.2705295907436811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092471761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890336,0.000019136838,0.0000361144,0.00830543,0.00030762635,0.00021359469,0.0000781615,0.00004968022,0.0019566861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967464,0.000020042806,0.00015518234,0.00239599,0.000072473136,0.000008938644,0.0000023472535,0.000012898451,0.0005856843],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883395,0.00024980668,0.00013783544,0.00016089725,0.00038392103,0.0002336056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991271,0.00033099405,0.000055375356,0.00032705118,0.000052046813,0.000107451364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010175013,0.00009270879,0.00011248937,0.00006340259,0.00035229887,0.00004078434,0.00036960625,0.000087703585,0.00003444663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025589208,0.000065861794,0.000047880192,0.00026882964,0.00017464974,0.000042065192,0.00006229735,0.0001698168,0.000014491134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005392804,0.0004801304,0.4082578,0.000016418628,0.00007819248,0.00000988671,0.38957882,0.00035673846,0.09395708,0.07917258,0.020872423,0.0066806166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045666852,0.00018052566,0.7331729,0.000023523398,0.00001691366,3.251552e-7,0.19237113,0.00010734054,0.002520191,0.0023759706,0.06849676,0.00027776632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005054218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016695706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32491505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026131771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009658143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27096337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093445077","doi":"10.1080/0042098032000065272","title":"Economic and Social Status in Household Decision-making: Evidence Relating to Extended Family Mobility","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Economics; Affect (linguistics); Unit (ring theory); Household income; Microeconomics; Demographic economics; Public economics; Labour economics; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.08022876418214692,"score_gpt":0.3481316426051662,"score_spread":0.2679028784230193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093445077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98748,0.0063897483,0.00011276954,0.00014399258,0.00044905485,0.00029629428,0.000012155613,0.000053670716,0.0050623273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99659693,0.0012160689,0.0016106623,0.00026878997,0.00008652352,0.00002526542,2.1602939e-7,0.000012198007,0.00018331656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983265,0.000222154,0.00032493353,0.0004126395,0.0002209613,0.0004928585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857336,0.0010457797,0.000082932114,0.00014890086,0.00006915556,0.00007985735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012318974,0.00015019554,0.0003024572,0.00009653776,0.00069551886,0.000069744696,0.00013069162,0.00008796947,0.0000052483415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014428899,0.00015174155,0.00004568521,0.00023624657,0.00028471855,0.00022048947,0.000102480495,0.00014286778,0.000009818366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024172523,0.00004295368,0.84103507,0.000018344532,0.000033133005,0.0000058731944,0.13198532,0.00017996549,0.000022313276,0.020247005,0.002352658,0.004053199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002281908,0.00004213977,0.84090513,0.00009263347,0.000015641444,2.6428373e-7,0.13917492,0.00003301769,8.380332e-7,0.014719407,0.004543668,0.00024414354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056543585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074632554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009116973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050835474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019735929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61878407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093635050","doi":"10.3138/cpp.37.3.395","title":"Families, Time, and Well-Being in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Distribution (mathematics); Paid work; Inequality; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Economics; Production (economics); Family income; Income distribution; Labour economics; Economic inequality; Economic growth; Working hours; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.015254163413634109,"score_gpt":0.22143249495333486,"score_spread":0.20617833153970075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093635050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47283986,0.000051076655,7.8702993e-7,0.0022145412,0.00012403118,0.00008337502,0.000024305458,0.000013416919,0.5246486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927939,0.00015117876,0.000049407867,0.0038700236,0.00015133967,0.000005329265,0.000009213482,0.0000121252215,0.0029574481],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986055,0.00007787917,0.00014144594,0.00018885532,0.00015635848,0.00082995225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867785,0.000028158094,0.000028965436,0.00015965199,0.00005076501,0.0010546084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002521723,0.00010120996,0.00012408909,0.00043341474,0.000314053,0.000064325715,0.00027700257,0.000086209584,0.00020617998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019969871,0.000118148666,0.000015158985,0.00074615487,0.00014315738,0.00018842584,0.000023122671,0.00012186306,0.000027598442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.9586534e-7,0.0000065583886,0.5810304,0.000005017206,0.000011031701,0.000048582293,0.020400088,5.688182e-7,0.000001986311,0.37985045,0.010478261,0.008166432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018800782,0.000006387405,0.65986955,0.0000066143953,0.0000034088544,0.000002635175,0.0107985865,0.00014121062,9.564427e-7,0.0055758194,0.32312962,0.0002771715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99997824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52169114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021511242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04041258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9650274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094036576","doi":"10.2202/1935-1682.2358","title":"High-Powered Careers and Marriage: Can Women Have It All?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Order (exchange); Marriage market; Work (physics); Labour economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Sociology; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.014091697749352797,"score_gpt":0.2869596546004751,"score_spread":0.2728679568511223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094036576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98350245,0.000058133464,0.00003008168,0.010824784,0.0002842665,0.00005749396,0.000024567968,0.0000063248544,0.0052119074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949995,0.0009085102,0.000108008084,0.0012549761,0.00095073297,0.0000013352661,0.0000022674458,0.000010980611,0.0017636735],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986618,0.0001892933,0.00045969588,0.00012506804,0.000165921,0.00039819416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998629,0.00016451126,0.00051564706,0.0002694547,0.000098251054,0.0003231348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00193349,0.00013268997,0.00042029907,0.0004155568,0.00031694543,0.00012935293,0.0005726984,0.00010638217,0.00025783325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001380537,0.00009896998,0.00019772134,0.00025764384,0.00034746696,0.00015889283,0.000054995424,0.00032194593,0.000010582547],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017861764,0.0001340379,0.32554293,0.000013410888,0.011127437,0.000022005946,0.5286657,0.006717064,0.0012832215,0.11194942,0.009705067,0.0046611046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025513438,0.00028321747,0.42414072,0.000011909657,0.00513689,0.000047087768,0.43275172,0.0026823329,0.000047317535,0.0663579,0.064883,0.001106553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038978208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0866207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098597795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003955934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066397653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9674213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094077304","doi":"10.1111/j.1939-7445.2007.tb00214.x","title":"HUMAN FERTILITY DECISIONS AND COMMON PROPERTY RESOURCES: A DYNAMIC ANALYSIS","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Resource Modeling","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University; Government of Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Stock (firearms); Population; Fertility; Renewable resource; Economics; Microeconomics; Human resources; Resource (disambiguation); Natural resource; Environmental economics; Computer science; Ecology; Geography; Demography; Renewable energy; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.03733804213922294,"score_gpt":0.33023960145552483,"score_spread":0.2929015593163019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094077304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811826,0.0011675926,0.010395391,0.00024708934,0.00006968622,0.00024025209,0.0000078678095,0.00015563519,0.006533892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966603,0.000044848708,0.0013313743,0.00028505182,0.00006753879,0.000003462701,0.000022516859,0.000019535784,0.0015654087],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973714,0.00020988117,0.00046846105,0.00052554416,0.00075795397,0.0006667611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876976,0.00023596444,0.000102228485,0.0003995917,0.00019553801,0.00029690808],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022825475,0.00021163023,0.0003648835,0.00035539796,0.0017154444,0.00018192183,0.00042651704,0.00025990338,0.000015685617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000414055,0.00015598541,0.00019758646,0.0012318158,0.00024881779,0.00014565984,0.00015000401,0.00056148984,0.0000035140627],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008308413,0.0007077407,0.42877987,0.000092566836,0.0016010195,0.00012698841,0.29355335,0.11865773,0.0066409614,0.0047483956,0.00025779533,0.14400275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042142035,0.000032943437,0.121230744,0.000042547876,0.00032769536,0.0000012925274,0.039370574,0.8328254,0.0000032256999,0.0019543658,0.003331814,0.000457968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006633787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049180083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71416765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020296057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004748566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094243098","doi":"10.1007/s00148-012-0453-5","title":"Optimal prevention when coexistence matters","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Subsidy; Altruism (biology); Spouse; Imperfect; Social policy; Microeconomics; Bargaining power; Social insurance; Public economics; Labour economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.04074743407245791,"score_gpt":0.30293314890509726,"score_spread":0.26218571483263936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094243098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99289215,0.00007793835,0.003079475,0.0010595104,0.0014685591,0.00006701232,0.0000027224396,0.00000788858,0.0013447233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98704493,0.00014729118,0.011161963,0.00033231603,0.0007431359,5.890919e-7,0.0000055525024,0.000007745163,0.0005564954],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991972,0.00007822772,0.0003811187,0.000053449516,0.00010096521,0.00018906647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992096,0.000031452782,0.00048409752,0.00006739988,0.00007669516,0.00013079257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008900508,0.000059259157,0.0001291323,0.00008043472,0.00014741492,0.00005604322,0.00013231597,0.00006880244,0.00008575648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046055495,0.000062508196,0.000091423375,0.000042943957,0.0000366846,0.0009385189,0.000012129429,0.00008840201,0.000016705044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031266653,0.00013228232,0.9169972,0.00001116474,0.00005830747,7.920412e-7,0.029648243,0.015445829,0.00002390727,0.031753864,0.0020149432,0.0038821858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056354544,0.0000765376,0.9255849,0.000026936754,0.00006649588,0.000020069441,0.016045429,0.0018675366,0.0000056348454,0.0077567543,0.047738615,0.0002475378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015852263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012099875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04572367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023557956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005997519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25490102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096654005","doi":"10.7202/602228ar","title":"Conjugalité et fécondité des femmes canadiennes : un modèle dynamique estimé à l’aide d’une série de coupes transversales","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.06931396671602749,"score_gpt":0.27655775504295665,"score_spread":0.20724378832692916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096654005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93886155,0.004136774,0.0042564995,0.026283763,0.0010408296,0.00068643776,0.0006611496,0.0002945423,0.023778435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97279954,0.005445139,0.0046416516,0.0075804126,0.0004988908,0.000055762066,0.00012290869,0.00009251771,0.008763193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947361,0.0010498225,0.0009801957,0.0010041076,0.00021596675,0.0020138454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663913,0.0010209852,0.00035159712,0.0006400539,0.0002669265,0.0010813142],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017271249,0.0008545432,0.0010020604,0.00020862302,0.0009628617,0.0003722896,0.00096535304,0.0009699871,0.00041363903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003689779,0.0009736799,0.0004505786,0.00069939106,0.0017350344,0.0011498486,0.00005702826,0.0007218489,0.00008071682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006709114,0.0004065385,0.017313229,0.00015400507,0.00028195808,0.00012847815,0.093365125,0.003307461,0.0007220265,0.85848916,0.0007412419,0.025023695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022681921,0.0007900325,0.21453601,0.00047861136,0.0005025617,0.00012436169,0.075529166,0.013598153,0.0011339246,0.63510543,0.053150505,0.0027830622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19644119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43177626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23533505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012281168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017051374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096988944","doi":"10.1023/a:1026256917489","title":"Gender Equality and Long-Run Growth","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Growth","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":283,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Economics; Human capital; Demographic economics; Economic geography; Economic system; Development economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.038985541460150715,"score_gpt":0.28810482811025767,"score_spread":0.24911928665010696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096988944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93848574,0.000489469,0.0010892441,0.00041492283,0.0009906695,0.00007019816,0.000005154152,0.000010080405,0.05844451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99715394,0.0011313405,0.00067322433,0.00031243547,0.00033220727,6.550585e-7,4.6603833e-7,0.000011665864,0.00038408287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869365,0.00024425396,0.0004590474,0.00015036055,0.00015357434,0.000299127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990226,0.00012857883,0.00035405412,0.00009483376,0.00014582656,0.00025411596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018605331,0.00011708604,0.00026976256,0.00010699906,0.00023492363,0.000105563755,0.00021125624,0.00011263922,0.00013105196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021930279,0.000111239984,0.00011392072,0.0000759528,0.00017801796,0.00040572826,0.000020754474,0.00019781594,0.000021134194],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009652296,0.000039960476,0.6050504,0.000014899802,0.000062948515,0.000009274367,0.0046789064,0.00001057926,0.000017273407,0.3889493,0.0010748411,0.00008195232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017573555,0.00015627134,0.7201031,0.000021075371,0.000110792025,0.00010704903,0.016618412,0.00006313147,0.00008005091,0.25165233,0.0088121295,0.00051830447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025034818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003806003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13729697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021138146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004646779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45362347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097123728","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00039.x","title":"The Deinstitutionalization of Marriage Revisited: A New Institutional Approach to Marriage","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Conceptualization; Institution; Institutionalism; Sociology; Positive economics; Criminology; Political science; Social science; Law; Epistemology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.029863716397236367,"score_gpt":0.3115397114504248,"score_spread":0.2816759950531884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097123728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06208307,0.3188461,0.24952008,0.0051207477,0.0075956816,0.0032819118,0.00008877534,0.00007826231,0.35338536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47425118,0.46162024,0.040970776,0.013108829,0.0047433428,0.000037101316,0.000040682447,0.00006626278,0.0051615704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997219,0.0006110909,0.00089188997,0.00016239361,0.0008529781,0.00026259176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977414,0.00030859618,0.0006644498,0.00030933233,0.0006864341,0.00028980768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00710696,0.00016020928,0.00043346235,0.00011163487,0.0005861756,0.00007404176,0.0007855544,0.000113048794,0.00007595618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023915165,0.00010724719,0.00028817574,0.0007405403,0.00040973167,0.00030874714,0.000057954476,0.00039396406,0.000019492882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003172802,0.00007286803,0.00059672375,0.0002091596,0.000048105543,0.0000033558683,0.0007670762,0.000057668913,0.0004778075,0.97440946,0.0070622247,0.016263831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004449196,0.000072442264,0.010647195,0.0015717631,0.00023349028,0.000049329374,0.0012113998,0.0000164298,0.000007659588,0.07563082,0.9098716,0.00024297062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004866904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004493436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9028094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009142673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015192274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4508448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098091184","doi":"10.3386/w15284","title":"The Rug Rat Race","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Race (biology); Demography; Biology; Sociology; Botany","score_opus":0.27991731654282886,"score_gpt":0.5202729776746507,"score_spread":0.24035566113182188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098091184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016472955,0.0021893387,0.0000031338566,0.00404586,0.0014818455,0.0004903077,0.000044065957,0.000018637566,0.9900795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.476149,0.07208295,0.00019997892,0.00011572824,0.0065031033,0.000107197586,0.00038055325,0.00006374565,0.44439775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951012,0.0005125788,0.0005499011,0.00039157478,0.0028441236,0.000600592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944475,0.0021888157,0.0002773585,0.00032433664,0.0026190355,0.00014291373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016068174,0.00015449732,0.0003193168,0.0003249313,0.0011717466,0.00021818026,0.0010871823,0.00045768113,0.00019419023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029578996,0.00013023296,0.00018529058,0.0002756467,0.0008676175,0.00013326605,0.00010942851,0.0008138378,0.00017835927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014631715,0.000035185385,0.0009456425,0.000017936605,0.00006554056,0.0000018014247,0.0006985646,0.0001098258,0.00000602733,0.64915615,0.34541538,0.0035333328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001269448,0.000029667835,0.0017831648,0.00002359833,0.0000064642177,0.0000016541488,0.0016205296,0.00008365133,0.0000032388004,0.31993228,0.6762544,0.00013437055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006052225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074056988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5456818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027267928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015876828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098170228","doi":"10.1186/2193-9004-2-19","title":"Labour supply and income distribution effects of the working income tax benefit: a general equilibrium microsimulation analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IZA Journal of Labor Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Employment and Social Development Canada","funders":"Human Resources and Skills Development Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Labour supply; Microsimulation; Labour economics; Income distribution; Welfare; General equilibrium theory; Gross income; Distribution (mathematics); Work (physics); Income tax; State income tax; Public economics; Macroeconomics; Tax reform; Market economy","score_opus":0.007440089519878464,"score_gpt":0.27006158351324844,"score_spread":0.26262149399337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098170228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968172,0.0005389046,0.00040526834,0.0015777763,0.0002966194,0.00018411023,0.00008841375,0.000008428126,0.00008333248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983367,0.00026564125,0.0003051863,0.00020399618,0.00060499826,0.0000024320914,0.0000057966604,0.000010528306,0.0002647529],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983865,0.000252532,0.00047847372,0.000121825775,0.00043693001,0.0003237128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834424,0.00020254626,0.0006055384,0.00017594198,0.00051025866,0.0001614894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048465581,0.00013376621,0.000336962,0.00026118723,0.00023948392,0.00014464326,0.0003369762,0.00012929612,0.00001308837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039100778,0.00009938292,0.00018315412,0.0020477143,0.00019602929,0.00032514334,0.00009164032,0.00019038723,0.0000013462272],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010728008,0.000037580416,0.96975565,0.00003055864,0.0001857406,0.0000016351938,0.003966484,0.0019379493,0.005968454,0.017297963,0.000031100255,0.0007761551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004422241,0.000044807697,0.99215883,0.00006105457,0.00017362526,0.0000027343726,0.00039849203,0.0007235489,0.0003183798,0.005117115,0.00045167908,0.00010750525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007383499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009552466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022403182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018985984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002529043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098693646","doi":"","title":"The Child Care Policy That Wasn't","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Social Policy / Revue canadienne de politique sociale","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.017882068237930576,"score_gpt":0.28501063084605505,"score_spread":0.26712856260812445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098693646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050081007,0.03813544,0.0000086992895,0.15100026,0.0010399406,0.0018794105,0.0016316036,0.000100665515,0.75612295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90679276,0.06595439,0.00004739948,0.018449215,0.0042896094,0.00012432894,0.000068008914,0.00009063932,0.0041836617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99486667,0.0010393786,0.0005840935,0.00040088317,0.00026258372,0.0028464205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963133,0.0001564647,0.00038074475,0.00046855333,0.0007055407,0.001975404],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001842739,0.00035939485,0.00067882193,0.00035146897,0.0037384685,0.00011657519,0.00094623683,0.00044523235,0.0000968768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004292268,0.00037876808,0.000506159,0.001632162,0.001211198,0.00015138158,0.00003348263,0.0005099933,0.000018981005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.2223767e-7,0.000007271775,0.0018879604,0.000915194,0.000045809604,0.000010506264,0.048319086,3.313874e-7,9.79367e-7,0.93924844,0.006434722,0.0031288776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017885485,0.000017644328,0.013104776,0.00062819436,0.00006488643,0.000011514263,0.061586276,3.6849127e-7,0.0000055931414,0.021812102,0.90216625,0.00042356714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9212845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9848934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91743636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009280871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02846194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098909956","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2573751","title":"Trends in Earnings Inequality and Earnings Instability Among U.S. Couples: How Important is Assortative Matching?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Economics; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Inequality; Demographic economics; Panel data; Matching (statistics); Social security; Labour economics; Economic inequality; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.02023318282245405,"score_gpt":0.2916455742724665,"score_spread":0.27141239145001245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098909956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955402,0.00067738426,0.00060695515,0.0015371954,0.00016234069,0.000112378904,0.000008407624,0.000042582713,0.0013125663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99614435,0.0022816437,0.0000821073,0.000113590606,0.00013177711,0.0000052850505,0.0000072877406,0.000017992164,0.001215958],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958845,0.00056636333,0.00044929644,0.0003669558,0.0007105996,0.002022288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986924,0.000105471474,0.00047039962,0.0001512586,0.00024874468,0.00033172185],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010092166,0.00021998424,0.00035658068,0.00023115826,0.00045237073,0.0001934024,0.0002950277,0.00019845476,0.000024696561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005637349,0.00020519976,0.00009932102,0.00067968195,0.00036496544,0.00060692936,0.00005409548,0.002310653,0.0000017765342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025179235,0.000051404553,0.9083181,0.0000028947954,0.00003968908,0.0000050871704,0.081671454,0.000008826665,0.000012839517,0.008168254,0.000042835356,0.0016534181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073059154,0.00018050043,0.73739743,0.000014739795,0.000020562456,0.000010686505,0.21008275,0.00019819142,0.0000014654033,0.050197,0.00092484086,0.00024121378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010989835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087751046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17092066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001601954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002794399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098920770","doi":"10.1596/1813-9450-3310","title":"Bundling Services and Household Welfare in Developing Countries: The Case of Peru","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Developing country; Business; Development economics; Economics; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.021778323583185686,"score_gpt":0.25295800375027955,"score_spread":0.23117968016709387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098920770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18284808,0.003196477,0.000032233467,0.0013211729,0.0012335066,0.001183212,0.00017666593,0.00016503295,0.8098436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36792096,0.0021299308,0.000986261,0.0031723287,0.00069437205,0.00006455688,0.00005153616,0.00022368309,0.62475634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699724,0.00031007855,0.0007746074,0.00064194616,0.0005480706,0.00072808296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981518,0.00043314038,0.0005211702,0.00052490795,0.00022959545,0.00013938585],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001753921,0.00051015936,0.0006951404,0.00041997593,0.0013335912,0.00034154695,0.00071289926,0.0004758258,0.000032580483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004676073,0.00044666408,0.00013329573,0.0002519785,0.0007227137,0.00015951516,0.00018684095,0.0007919828,0.000003586489],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027555447,0.00003181147,0.0076515027,0.0014877811,0.00017769252,0.00063365523,0.1348986,0.000076117,0.0000038170615,0.8512264,0.0020152554,0.0017698221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004895983,0.00001972059,0.0010788168,0.0010744153,0.00013992065,0.000053611744,0.027924655,0.00004062887,0.0000072061853,0.011610325,0.956701,0.00086013094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065317345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23634557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9546857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053579727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014331334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099768220","doi":"10.1177/0956797611417260","title":"Opting Out or Denying Discrimination? How the Framework of Free Choice in American Society Influences Perceptions of Gender Inequality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Inequality; Perception; Social psychology; Opting out; Gender inequality; Social perception","score_opus":0.20010252119528876,"score_gpt":0.43286238657465315,"score_spread":0.23275986537936438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099768220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852087,0.000020913292,0.007824328,0.0007645719,0.00019231865,0.00017960856,0.000008372687,0.000025281543,0.0057759034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788724,0.00010498675,0.020521093,0.0003985195,0.000050077295,0.000014625572,3.2672014e-7,0.0000031203672,0.000034833316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979207,0.00026475594,0.00030690702,0.00038157273,0.0007056356,0.00042040876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848557,0.00053324294,0.0002772947,0.00038860503,0.00021405029,0.00010121484],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028067154,0.00010437239,0.00019713315,0.000057008034,0.000562931,0.000054769724,0.0014768156,0.000093219795,0.000083138104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003003578,0.00006185815,0.000087083245,0.0018408998,0.005513558,0.00033252386,0.00017100123,0.0002665811,0.0000018588634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055351848,0.00017435003,0.87443787,0.000007096894,0.000003615227,3.2984482e-7,0.10622331,0.0000162272,0.0011362735,0.015456425,0.000020836163,0.0025181554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006746201,0.00005770931,0.87172186,0.00001417433,0.0000059296603,2.2101402e-7,0.11867022,0.00010365743,0.00001063865,0.009246027,0.0000207729,0.00008133865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022596982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022842514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012696765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006548642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010643333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99719286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099934967","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.435340","title":"Nobody to Play with? The Implications of Leisure Coordination","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"nobody; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Business; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.009822864553041075,"score_gpt":0.2718673607236912,"score_spread":0.2620444961706501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099934967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9119641,0.00048400823,0.05609243,0.011259747,0.0001367738,0.00027202966,0.0000039377,0.000018914781,0.01976803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99713707,0.00038144426,0.00013804875,0.00008921983,0.000085180465,0.0000067563324,0.0000010412538,0.000008223315,0.0021530278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985033,0.00015407457,0.000130479,0.000095577794,0.00024784615,0.00086868583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999408,0.00005983842,0.00010493968,0.00012210001,0.00023886621,0.00006624166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016559423,0.00006729065,0.00008919631,0.000054334654,0.0006155445,0.000037745263,0.00025480386,0.000048634593,0.000015877285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000766753,0.00004601791,0.000041788644,0.0004526212,0.000084015934,0.00009338059,0.0000066542225,0.0004767514,0.000007312887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048781885,0.000028889992,0.045946006,6.904992e-7,0.00003629609,1.10877274e-7,0.0036169095,0.00015853587,0.0003253137,0.9485294,0.00026562106,0.0010873134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011625357,0.0007720751,0.20925203,0.000021219372,0.00014363273,0.00012291734,0.22135812,0.000029818795,0.000108566,0.48047668,0.08608193,0.00047046744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020271381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014581949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46805274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038122875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023920345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.813707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100983712","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2012.01731.x","title":"Female labour force participation in an era of organizational and technological change","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Workforce; Economics; Technological change; Wage; Human capital; Labour supply; Real wages; Organizational change; Market economy; Economic growth; Political science; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.1431615640251057,"score_gpt":0.23773403783410532,"score_spread":0.09457247380899964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100983712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979626,0.0002603909,0.000034223944,0.0008583882,0.00039767404,0.00016089398,0.00006796084,0.0000039411702,0.00025390455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863994,0.0001985989,0.00040181327,0.0002794332,0.00038919525,0.000007727247,0.000008214366,0.00001535659,0.000059749178],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988011,0.0000914332,0.00043709402,0.00013375765,0.0000041634057,0.00053242315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982954,0.00007168447,0.00029256401,0.000121747245,0.00016750599,0.0010510786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096578046,0.00010928303,0.00027745918,0.0003112706,0.00014108494,0.000042869924,0.00023407041,0.00020002073,0.00010507693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028243978,0.00013129882,0.000037041966,0.00019074367,0.0002677245,0.00070370384,0.000011131611,0.0002156209,0.0000018095683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046306764,0.000012881907,0.54213786,0.0000066842967,0.000008161746,0.0000041610624,0.012072448,0.00011893118,0.000008634099,0.44464087,0.000002721939,0.0009820295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063914555,0.00024779318,0.88568914,0.00006238608,0.000028237931,0.000042305324,0.02587529,0.0007427031,0.00004611156,0.08342174,0.0028086668,0.00039646353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.115678154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9833441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86766595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000790603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010363717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8902106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101524309","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.132424","title":"Overview: The Regional Economics of Child Care","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"W.K. Kellogg Foundation","keywords":"Economic sector; Spillover effect; Child care; Private sector; Welfare; Public sector; Public economics; Economics; Economic growth; Business; Medicine; Economy; Nursing; Market economy","score_opus":0.03714150503017011,"score_gpt":0.2616737852790643,"score_spread":0.2245322802488942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101524309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9385382,0.0003002962,0.000052955973,0.007001994,0.000080935184,0.00078189763,0.000049792416,0.000013792655,0.053180113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99477875,0.0026101589,0.0002972162,0.00040270545,0.00007442012,7.0108933e-7,0.000014229341,0.0000050712742,0.0018167337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989962,0.00015817596,0.000115411065,0.00019406842,0.00026510505,0.0002710431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991938,0.00010234202,0.00011203016,0.00027222888,0.00021578731,0.000103799604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043027353,0.0000879476,0.00018751017,0.00009298898,0.00057492347,0.000014490269,0.0006363977,0.00010491534,0.00024286011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018029457,0.000092008755,0.00014378669,0.00025292893,0.0005499754,0.00023442927,0.000069447524,0.00015529714,0.000025652154],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021738301,0.00041973405,0.066325635,0.00017750823,0.0002147909,0.00003927449,0.37179318,0.0006456525,0.0001703493,0.453017,0.026410041,0.08056947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008613952,0.00016679738,0.4544064,0.000034265042,0.0000354311,0.0000021666033,0.27812153,0.00025010033,0.000019648434,0.0013340592,0.26455006,0.00021813608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037634198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0100210905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45168293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009048208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023017653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.568919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102444313","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00378.x","title":"Failing the Transition from Welfare to Work: Women Chronically Disconnected from Employment and Cash Welfare<sup>*</sup>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Disadvantaged; Cash; Welfare reform; Demographic economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Single mothers; Labour economics; Economics; Business; Psychology; Economic growth; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.00990832258737824,"score_gpt":0.2521673317653547,"score_spread":0.2422590091779765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102444313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760325,0.00005654496,0.00095874554,0.019244013,0.0003282118,0.00046182977,0.00017348182,0.0001267499,0.0026179226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816597,0.0000045609872,0.0002451976,0.00053090503,0.00085019687,0.00005580991,0.000030555,0.000016475198,0.000100354715],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966879,0.000264779,0.00035544,0.00068430003,0.0010140144,0.0009935726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991012,0.00011334275,0.00009757792,0.0002459668,0.00015574333,0.000286169],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010175062,0.00022489215,0.0002620498,0.00008223285,0.0045456844,0.00077134965,0.0007210905,0.0001612062,0.0001654071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004099779,0.00018704304,0.000083494335,0.0012526427,0.0012538568,0.0005390371,0.00003413887,0.00022473055,0.000019565126],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054730477,0.00015318887,0.009763515,0.000003944966,0.000032967306,0.000010234766,0.91284627,0.00019028086,0.0009551495,0.034654167,0.0002204026,0.041115157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005658975,0.000199169,0.39850807,0.000019750396,0.000033492404,2.5669698e-7,0.5814971,0.0004033958,0.0000072713674,0.012965239,0.005315136,0.00048524616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03569203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0109667955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38874456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006143182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028756954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99675024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103684782","doi":"10.1353/cpp.2010.0024","title":"Implications of the Introduction of the Goods and Services Tax for Families in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Almost ideal demand system; Welfare; Economics; Goods and services; Demographic economics; Public economics; Engel curve; Survey data collection; Income tax; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Production (economics); Economy; Aggregate expenditure","score_opus":0.010255453732197422,"score_gpt":0.2462392602606427,"score_spread":0.23598380652844528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103684782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91813916,0.00002140241,0.0000011394629,0.07594507,0.00032952646,0.00022327252,0.0003433668,0.0000018032192,0.0049952525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859923,0.000021287213,0.000022959493,0.000846882,0.00024193407,0.000016088092,0.000003838545,0.0000041220146,0.0002436527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994121,0.00003996457,0.0001230529,0.000092377966,0.00008972519,0.00024277809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993946,0.00003639432,0.00007568905,0.00024891453,0.00010697905,0.00013742891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019775846,0.000046688332,0.00007237497,0.00009991779,0.00028640486,0.000021697571,0.00037673046,0.0000516517,0.0000062815875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024724274,0.00003415321,0.000021974036,0.00064825476,0.00022582375,0.00006225076,0.000022611011,0.00008474241,5.993128e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.2610038e-7,0.0000043440004,0.4692533,0.000017981662,0.000006305937,1.1751145e-8,0.0042140014,0.0000036104818,0.0003433035,0.51973295,0.0027477893,0.0036760597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058060814,0.0000018260155,0.8572837,0.000001675557,0.000003332297,3.5072594e-7,0.008507916,0.000030488613,0.000017408947,0.004651592,0.12940474,0.00003888557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99949175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51508135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031429343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014920866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99066365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103861365","doi":"10.7202/1007755ar","title":"Les représentations des rapports sociaux de sexe au sein des politiques de lutte contre la pauvreté au Pérou","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches féministes","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.22007633825940634,"score_gpt":0.43007756252623897,"score_spread":0.21000122426683263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103861365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7914425,0.006148041,0.0032829153,0.003378563,0.00069625786,0.00031591908,0.00011049884,0.00021095987,0.19441433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9122352,0.0046394006,0.020153202,0.00049390167,0.0015927427,0.000069573885,0.000039711933,0.000081022044,0.060695242],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920682,0.00440446,0.00058172113,0.00047023612,0.00036954987,0.0021058484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954491,0.0027971736,0.0003013145,0.00036803522,0.00028771805,0.0007966565],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005802411,0.00046425482,0.00051274523,0.000113810405,0.0015433098,0.00021828384,0.00042037465,0.0011156803,0.00012316344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017287283,0.00050913513,0.00033895578,0.00061334035,0.0034563732,0.0006637821,0.000104214145,0.00065854914,0.000052033345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009158148,0.00027651363,0.502117,0.0001899655,0.00012297789,0.000012916736,0.28684756,0.0000052849114,0.00029687217,0.19586565,0.0003472813,0.013908872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003273025,0.00008572804,0.57045853,0.00025869813,0.00029007965,0.000055813307,0.28015056,0.00011317022,0.0004913647,0.13652033,0.010634461,0.0006139602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07974441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015033366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13371909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004305986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033197324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104376558","doi":"10.1093/restud/rds035","title":"Should Day Care be Subsidized?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Economics; Subsidy; Welfare; Consumption (sociology); Labour economics; Labour supply; Deadweight loss; Work (physics); Macroeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.11837847155367162,"score_gpt":0.3813011190089052,"score_spread":0.2629226474552335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104376558","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064457595,0.87494946,0.0000022342365,0.003262199,0.001117763,0.00035735127,0.000020519463,0.000021409553,0.05581148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3670334,0.63111234,0.00004109984,0.0010402973,0.000326879,0.000021266114,0.0000019490442,0.0000065190093,0.00041623838],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990419,0.00021043365,0.00028008013,0.0001042023,0.00009243085,0.00027096478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999186,0.00028644459,0.00015728243,0.00024978298,0.00007155251,0.000048943195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015903051,0.00010404646,0.00040484036,0.00001603893,0.0002998454,0.000007244414,0.00028871265,0.00003257905,0.00008516023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022366895,0.000068161986,0.00013296992,0.0000670145,0.0003518844,0.00010197207,0.000090151036,0.000064400716,0.00006634025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005538599,0.000066807625,0.11658475,0.0059766145,0.00091601536,5.378201e-7,0.45572492,0.000009063055,0.000010021242,0.3232785,0.07635326,0.021073993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017442637,0.000021758406,0.016055863,0.0011424655,0.00032041143,6.599603e-7,0.20912586,0.0000015198929,0.000012695582,0.0010832534,0.77178663,0.00027443806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023413895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058476627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6954334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014243904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007831295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27795652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104685344","doi":"","title":"Assortative Marriage and the Effects of Government Homecare Subsidy Programs on Gender Wage and Participation Inequality","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Economics; Inequality; Government (linguistics); Labour economics; Wage inequality; Wage; Affect (linguistics); Gender inequality; Demographic economics; Psychology; Market economy","score_opus":0.010849798151074352,"score_gpt":0.2701046601276462,"score_spread":0.2592548619765719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104685344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99587643,0.0014423272,0.0006993273,0.00019960779,0.00010698022,0.0003335889,0.0000059808535,0.000009107522,0.001326647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976413,0.0018797148,0.000018523397,0.000043728858,0.00011065708,0.000015218138,0.0000033618396,0.000007699703,0.00027980024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780905,0.000532286,0.0002111959,0.00013682942,0.00051004253,0.00080061844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993475,0.00026149105,0.00019915089,0.000079475605,0.00005881712,0.00005356212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023713345,0.00010294651,0.00016539624,0.00001852727,0.00036111305,0.00006371952,0.00009449327,0.0000637819,0.000001915557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016086815,0.00007011056,0.000048148653,0.00012095477,0.00024407942,0.000095259966,0.000017309714,0.00045018963,4.6234183e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011445329,0.00013943859,0.24341428,0.000026155476,0.00011177285,0.0000021415237,0.016174179,0.000011060321,0.00011883168,0.7294333,0.000014293556,0.010440103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026664461,0.0005442148,0.6529751,0.000028590124,0.00012959454,0.000004232323,0.048579946,0.0001268849,0.00007527559,0.29455414,0.00012884494,0.00018672626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012689376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014501147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43487915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039705785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025403962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.809198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104833616","doi":"","title":"DETERMINING GENERAL AND SPECIFIC PURPOSE TRANSFERS: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equalization (audio); Revenue; Economics; Econometrics; Panel data; Transfer (computing); Fiscal capacity; Computer science; Public economics; Operations research; Engineering; Telecommunications; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.06261385318240192,"score_gpt":0.3326659566197382,"score_spread":0.27005210343733627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104833616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8874403,0.00021412285,0.00015356742,0.00012344915,0.0003676791,0.00090885005,0.000068914094,0.00008088927,0.11064218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93618405,0.048598953,0.012242945,0.00011299692,0.0007234048,0.0001260982,0.00021586534,0.000078403136,0.0017173098],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956797,0.0009709675,0.00059061724,0.0012299049,0.00039975197,0.0011290568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983638,0.00017711794,0.00010048542,0.00072928367,0.00015821616,0.00047112702],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033660207,0.00037486546,0.0005940803,0.0005417332,0.0005232701,0.00062058185,0.00095567055,0.0008202588,0.000029602816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013101159,0.0004171753,0.00013349928,0.0002524427,0.00087054376,0.00025004207,0.00025605087,0.0019451136,0.000002560994],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007977606,0.00034884605,0.016871516,0.00009252884,0.00006182154,0.00005460489,0.03158858,0.005854944,0.00014767805,0.005934977,0.00003521886,0.9389295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048964517,0.0014974747,0.22707975,0.00071532454,0.00008996989,0.000051371488,0.32994986,0.22242785,0.00005750205,0.031192157,0.17635186,0.005690429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000694928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030401433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9332391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009068296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010919338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105972217","doi":"10.7202/012856ar","title":"La division sexuée du travail professionnel et domestique : quelques remarques pour une perspective temporelle","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Lien social et Politiques","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0254488774222229,"score_gpt":0.3428880648306511,"score_spread":0.3174391874084282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105972217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48381427,0.004831516,0.0012927493,0.069988266,0.00126757,0.0006918118,0.00029034488,0.0005106977,0.43731278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96091443,0.006728089,0.0015848842,0.002764287,0.0029141451,0.00007000287,0.00010118141,0.00011530823,0.024807641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99142313,0.0048008985,0.0007783868,0.0008871526,0.00086270773,0.0012477079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971897,0.0008006338,0.00048555582,0.00030247314,0.0009104716,0.000311171],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025052272,0.0006534341,0.00077915244,0.00017756871,0.0013989166,0.00038104889,0.0005687421,0.0012405986,0.00012474578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038259412,0.000663558,0.00040843265,0.0008435913,0.0018928426,0.0009197705,0.00023349094,0.0010993229,0.000087238564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000195747,0.00060897355,0.016825363,0.0000752058,0.000053059117,0.00004408181,0.22497222,0.00000823049,0.000098477765,0.7417904,0.014834742,0.0006696656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005205252,0.0001293506,0.13246393,0.00022593392,0.00006599106,0.000007355239,0.41844714,0.00008092874,0.0000424987,0.4221758,0.025181137,0.00065940863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32401332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03860061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4771002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011419486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017592022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106652671","doi":"10.3138/cpp.33.2.227","title":"Welfare Reforms and Consumption among Single Mother Households: Evidence from Canadian Provinces","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Consumption (sociology); Propensity score matching; Demographic economics; Single mothers; Matching (statistics); Demography; Economics; Population; Welfare reform; Difference in differences; Geography; Socioeconomics; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Econometrics","score_opus":0.039062150096174815,"score_gpt":0.2734722811349088,"score_spread":0.23441013103873398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106652671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9277284,0.00042806874,0.000023632103,0.015400082,0.0002746252,0.00030093527,0.00024110911,0.00008079408,0.055522345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541295,0.0001933444,0.00010201741,0.0021573505,0.0005472452,0.000008559081,0.000026552034,0.00002770477,0.0015242788],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978337,0.0000776456,0.00022056336,0.000351962,0.00027138047,0.0012447054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673945,0.00006665583,0.0000827421,0.0002844242,0.00012743319,0.002699317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073724793,0.00017088716,0.00015878706,0.00061032595,0.0011624201,0.00045006096,0.00040513754,0.00028444768,0.00014936132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061638426,0.00017239737,0.00003833385,0.0005971592,0.0006010313,0.00082792994,0.000021636906,0.00017320165,0.000029944169],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018308039,0.00000913503,0.927033,0.000009616015,0.000019555315,0.000030204175,0.010867462,7.7339547e-7,0.000020177988,0.046062082,0.0015562098,0.01438995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011030682,0.000016777498,0.8420207,0.000029419796,0.000007822351,0.0000018346411,0.0062948223,0.000022218783,0.000003217036,0.0009121625,0.15032645,0.00025426096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99911815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14877024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032404172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007146216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99848235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106923500","doi":"10.25336/p67g9d","title":"The Effect of Education on Early Parenthood among Young Canadian Adults","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Hazard; Psychology; Demographic economics; Educational attainment; Demography; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.01481880711432826,"score_gpt":0.3006331116900097,"score_spread":0.28581430457568147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106923500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844874,0.00056847156,4.340119e-7,0.00053140655,0.0012723699,0.00039461625,0.000011542543,0.000009282814,0.01272449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931574,0.00018027482,0.0000061354967,0.00012563748,0.00012635635,0.000020099716,0.000021305023,0.0000052533383,0.00019920737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989494,0.00018398154,0.00018725242,0.00014776914,0.00017564002,0.00035595696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932563,0.000096708,0.00007148311,0.0001471689,0.00009337812,0.00026565843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048819478,0.0000925058,0.00012836725,0.00022053428,0.0007485774,0.000029948129,0.00014032442,0.00008208603,0.0000019887286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005987019,0.00007869924,0.00003199008,0.0003964788,0.000118430995,0.000090963375,0.0000034622558,0.00009203083,0.000002824251],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056358394,0.000003266089,0.9657078,0.0000047525036,0.000007792545,0.0000012127638,0.015224831,0.000043465643,1.2260142e-7,0.0063254223,0.0005671048,0.012108603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011284361,0.00008195359,0.9828478,0.000055223216,0.0000085050715,1.0784424e-7,0.015166264,0.00003835393,4.4752647e-7,0.0010500987,0.0005580723,0.0000803479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9846767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99960655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017139992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014558358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055417273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5757528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107558897","doi":"10.1007/s13524-012-0124-x","title":"Panel Conditioning in Longitudinal Studies: Evidence From Labor Force Items in the Current Population Survey","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; York University; University of Minnesota; University of Wisconsin-Madison; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Current Population Survey; Attrition; Unemployment; Demographic economics; Survey data collection; Survey research; Panel data; Population; Panel survey; Psychology; British Household Panel Survey; Economics; Econometrics; Demography; Statistics; Medicine; Sociology; Mathematics; Applied psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.1617028587789282,"score_gpt":0.382987064569149,"score_spread":0.2212842057902208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107558897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9784191,0.019940102,0.00019655816,0.00014497325,0.00086746557,0.00025905814,0.000046390927,0.000034502256,0.00009180976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99603873,0.0034622326,0.00006690881,0.000092722745,0.00022134936,0.00003583114,0.00006939773,0.000008290749,0.0000045280713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792975,0.00082714274,0.0002668513,0.00019944482,0.00038409632,0.00039269097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984477,0.0011365451,0.00010388472,0.00015783611,0.00009555079,0.00005845833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026140849,0.0001118658,0.00016966712,0.00018050052,0.00024057743,0.00006128052,0.00024313151,0.00006389017,0.000004821811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058573124,0.00009152246,0.000058763395,0.0014990446,0.00013883309,0.00057606626,0.000025754562,0.00021747938,0.0000044648186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005213487,0.0000511983,0.96762013,0.000007794241,0.000009755458,6.799608e-7,0.029999265,0.00003670476,0.0000019118588,0.0012934835,0.000109853354,0.00086400314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012486026,0.00000890065,0.9797256,0.00008736109,0.000011062163,9.243513e-8,0.017312879,0.00006737418,2.2878925e-7,0.0022088801,0.00033663627,0.000116106065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015024478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068242885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05321841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069914495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031574626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99153453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107917899","doi":"10.1007/s11113-008-9125-2","title":"The Demographic Foundations of Rising Employment and Earnings among Single Mothers in Canada and the United States, 1980–2000","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Population Research and Policy Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Ministry of Labour; Statistics Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Baby boom; Earnings; Demographic economics; Welfare; Economics; Single mothers; Population; Welfare state; Demographic change; Boom; Cohort; Developed country; Demography; Labour economics; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.06548275993126319,"score_gpt":0.38482140679060584,"score_spread":0.31933864685934266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107917899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742506,0.014394416,0.000007015606,0.010499772,0.000010254379,0.00044821072,0.000005155623,0.000004029502,0.00038053736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8341459,0.16531262,0.000014757488,0.00038219662,0.000017189903,0.000006931937,0.000012559084,0.0000029538924,0.0001048621],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843174,0.0006867611,0.00021755187,0.000101547106,0.0003139199,0.00024848996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999194,0.00043392746,0.00007680779,0.00009750082,0.00010642872,0.00009130338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020210256,0.000056304238,0.00012850911,0.0001263879,0.0007039891,0.00008161875,0.00008533572,0.000021571923,0.0000026144287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049301924,0.000035665173,0.000013595741,0.0010650405,0.00041995494,0.00006839964,0.00001983613,0.00013437163,9.6373746e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010822923,0.000012452286,0.9359436,0.00008536562,0.0000099755825,3.5150407e-7,0.006043873,0.000032017113,0.0000012278534,0.02844557,0.000140141,0.029274605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001868862,0.000024276691,0.9773662,0.00022221057,0.000006474082,3.4905364e-7,0.0019863204,0.00047471464,7.574284e-8,0.0068999785,0.012786638,0.000045856683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9423246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1509182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012655201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003259529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54145867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108037574","doi":"10.7202/013472ar","title":"Les transferts ascendants au Bangladesh, une décision familiale?","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.0450104751405972,"score_gpt":0.2797997487527308,"score_spread":0.2347892736121336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108037574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8897934,0.0017091659,0.003088285,0.0070988154,0.003912969,0.0005305588,0.00033573227,0.00016692874,0.09336415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9497367,0.0018150902,0.0007987791,0.0008556264,0.00231398,0.000030172136,0.000108432505,0.00007802925,0.04426317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960313,0.0006647508,0.0009174101,0.00084836147,0.00026692008,0.0012712528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823844,0.0005072714,0.00019875662,0.0005251204,0.00016016165,0.00037022363],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009527926,0.00057379116,0.00068642467,0.00015280282,0.0008621376,0.00019879603,0.00065286167,0.0009574393,0.0006019073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000763466,0.0006270851,0.0004076277,0.00064152776,0.00096313027,0.0005805359,0.00006760257,0.00048615472,0.00036231603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093781884,0.0008343782,0.06654581,0.00021560771,0.00013783456,0.000064384134,0.044205125,0.00064319366,0.0010154044,0.7803169,0.0047786287,0.10114896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016966136,0.00022647642,0.2766086,0.0002440383,0.00017871003,0.00001595105,0.014559807,0.0012656269,0.0005306157,0.07978999,0.62337637,0.0015072033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3293726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1776491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7005269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010640898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007622364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108150068","doi":"10.7202/008998ar","title":"La reproduction des populations autochtones du Canada : exogamie, fécondité et mobilité ethnique","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.022484712886068205,"score_gpt":0.27151940000998376,"score_spread":0.24903468712391555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108150068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95752853,0.014347177,0.0035931463,0.008749608,0.0036724359,0.00060919585,0.0001762494,0.00024169835,0.011081946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97640103,0.0128952665,0.004015475,0.0015799322,0.0006650769,0.00010954052,0.00008521681,0.00007501187,0.0041734464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99603724,0.0009292002,0.00059079967,0.00087374146,0.00057179254,0.0009972506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997853,0.00026218948,0.00026512207,0.00070206,0.00037023914,0.0005473788],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017046198,0.00045199235,0.00041755728,0.00035382676,0.0014607364,0.00012605696,0.00046123276,0.0007802613,0.000052779546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007457244,0.00053290935,0.00031934647,0.0028031347,0.0037300778,0.00053838926,0.000047189606,0.0009096097,0.000008328818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002208754,0.00039307814,0.14178902,0.00017042196,0.00021145854,0.00023997144,0.09686154,0.009145391,0.00013833783,0.739023,0.004452213,0.007553522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008936234,0.00015362169,0.5187211,0.0001891521,0.000358139,0.00024444662,0.07758354,0.000109174696,0.00006037567,0.14905517,0.25140584,0.0012257813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9747218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99579036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5899678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018893054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004861211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108722879","doi":"10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00410.x","title":"Fiscal Externalities of Becoming a Parent","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Population and Development Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Employment and Social Development Canada","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Externality; Economics; Population; Homogeneous; Argument (complex analysis); Demographic economics; Public economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Demography","score_opus":0.13761261029409116,"score_gpt":0.3407707818473888,"score_spread":0.20315817155329763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108722879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9190996,0.053333253,0.0023416183,0.00028495622,0.00040701102,0.0005801082,0.0000035204175,0.000061342704,0.023888558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591725,0.033135694,0.0068203527,0.0003533494,0.00001992527,0.000011932484,0.000012807133,0.000003786087,0.0004696501],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935603,0.000058515423,0.00025530814,0.00008401397,0.0001488722,0.00009724763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997594,0.000012727001,0.00009387798,0.000049577102,0.000034282693,0.00005014349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038117875,0.0000536523,0.0001398512,0.000024070941,0.00011744697,0.000008088741,0.000052881107,0.000023865887,0.00016273302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003882506,0.00004640293,0.000020528098,0.00006549715,0.00003013413,0.000066945526,0.000018995965,0.00002397959,0.000004971146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012502261,0.00002073037,0.91151214,0.00044410588,0.000008768199,3.4546386e-7,0.02012825,8.036287e-8,5.391395e-7,0.018489754,0.00008849772,0.049305517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006165541,0.000003937047,0.9675945,0.00052141905,0.000010080038,3.756457e-7,0.0015274016,0.0000038160338,0.000001775722,0.0009903312,0.029204063,0.00008064137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007429389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004951828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05608234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022463972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004118295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18922566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109440569","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2009.01538.x","title":"Income splitting, specialization, and intra‐family distribution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Labour supply; Economics; Labour economics; Welfare; Term (time); Distribution (mathematics); Control (management); Inequality; Market economy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06393182920068309,"score_gpt":0.20415173597469605,"score_spread":0.14021990677401297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109440569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99173784,0.00032271654,0.00040391154,0.0024164477,0.0013093986,0.000170843,0.00015417502,0.000008840252,0.003475854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99658376,0.0006822011,0.00028202642,0.0007735497,0.0012719224,0.000001612071,0.000030963074,0.000017163831,0.00035679986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983347,0.000094617186,0.0006472206,0.00024580414,0.000005058605,0.0006725695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972315,0.00007366048,0.00043891097,0.00018810005,0.00028148838,0.0017863823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009937634,0.00018671284,0.00038026995,0.00030648452,0.00051717745,0.0002526137,0.00037247126,0.00021295552,0.00008734103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035027933,0.00023926688,0.00010184087,0.00018397144,0.00027125588,0.00049116975,0.000008506927,0.00024552306,0.000005978172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012434957,0.000007558421,0.059640553,0.0000075805197,0.00003177486,0.000043437485,0.006049535,0.00055991404,0.000005683731,0.92743313,0.00048669637,0.0057217055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009593002,0.00040174415,0.32972166,0.00011441591,0.000072375646,0.00014202544,0.010070324,0.0009863961,0.000009011904,0.48909554,0.16765983,0.00076738966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14890899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96956277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8206538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00208265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003043635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97570205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109718882","doi":"10.1111/0008-4085.00023","title":"Employment and child‐care choices in Canada and the United States","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Sociology; Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Welfare economics; Economics; Medicine; Nursing; Art","score_opus":0.04510013984159392,"score_gpt":0.18212744733791242,"score_spread":0.1370273074963185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109718882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674716,0.012734975,8.7149965e-7,0.015399658,0.0015700129,0.00031994793,0.00043042982,0.0000018774448,0.002070622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719984,0.022659654,0.000042628497,0.0031922653,0.0004780939,0.000007827907,0.000025215964,0.00003520791,0.0015607247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752873,0.00029292665,0.00084245886,0.0003349526,0.000007087127,0.000993854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969456,0.0003197653,0.00038294902,0.00023161036,0.00014095302,0.0019791203],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000779282,0.00032224486,0.0006496208,0.00036819227,0.0005058676,0.00022528006,0.00048675592,0.00018221201,0.00036575165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070055015,0.0003317475,0.00009191828,0.00027862057,0.0010103935,0.0003573749,0.000018200355,0.0005426734,0.0000029434818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001670646,0.000016358003,0.36980486,0.00017086716,0.0003801905,0.00040859365,0.11160791,0.056529738,7.351176e-8,0.4283778,0.0006647417,0.031871777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005259952,0.00031694732,0.12585999,0.00068610354,0.00022974086,0.00060160295,0.14382876,0.011994296,0.0000013039767,0.07777158,0.63219225,0.0012574262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63152754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056196833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008880593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109820501","doi":"10.3386/w10186","title":"Stressed Out on Four Continents: Time Crunch or Yuppie Kvetch?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Crunch; Geology; Climatology; Biology","score_opus":0.4137800165164997,"score_gpt":0.5226222846885459,"score_spread":0.10884226817204617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109820501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008541666,0.00024560932,0.0000044266703,0.0014063425,0.0015569788,0.0008736204,0.00045526476,0.000034120974,0.986882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.268689,0.0059704576,0.00031927697,0.00019143632,0.0033351816,0.00016297343,0.001048808,0.00012245601,0.72016037],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934884,0.0006110345,0.0008385231,0.0007329664,0.0035298273,0.00079926196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993621,0.0018838457,0.0004468088,0.0004140639,0.0033740662,0.00026025056],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008584125,0.00029799034,0.0006695923,0.00083327654,0.00049029366,0.00017682741,0.000948805,0.0007874257,0.0033283655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005352226,0.00028273053,0.0002435789,0.00029881933,0.0005910204,0.00017364416,0.00010858775,0.0009159915,0.0011461182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018430152,0.00041707998,0.0053850655,0.00017636937,0.0005230376,0.000029995734,0.0014963257,0.00034807273,0.00007869925,0.18192236,0.8083173,0.0011214077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020211407,0.00041998562,0.0048552337,0.0003890875,0.00006168207,0.00000817451,0.0030444441,0.00053709676,0.00004762579,0.15728338,0.8302922,0.0010398926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004116022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030713922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26672158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032663322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014544744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110812423","doi":"10.1007/bf03404006","title":"Welfare Reforms and the Cognitive Development of Young Children","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Public Health","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Poverty; Welfare; Household income; Psychology; Cognitive development; Cognition; Bivariate analysis; Family income; Multivariate analysis; Unemployment; Demographic economics; Child development; Developmental psychology; Economics; Economic growth; Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.029906412346064382,"score_gpt":0.2836723722289516,"score_spread":0.2537659598828872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110812423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94936454,0.0016309517,0.00035815345,0.041033413,0.00020210525,0.00017138803,0.000023592747,0.0000030978122,0.007212732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99758315,0.0003416747,0.0007054363,0.0010377972,0.0001863483,0.0000010191287,0.0000036288634,0.000005432572,0.00013551582],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864537,0.00021215383,0.00039189216,0.000068620924,0.0002470851,0.00043488303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982068,0.000040028168,0.00029661824,0.000055228094,0.0003352653,0.0010660797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003791045,0.0000642735,0.00018487858,0.00016585516,0.0008478922,0.000070866394,0.00020965462,0.000051642142,0.00004509518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034599126,0.000042936677,0.000036614998,0.00023340668,0.00037810684,0.0002062528,0.000008330225,0.00018250456,0.0000013142273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008449133,0.000022249398,0.31184703,0.0000139764925,0.000095517156,0.0000031975562,0.34681678,0.000002120611,1.3792311e-7,0.07241944,0.0006340367,0.26813704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093139795,0.000040743056,0.8358951,0.000031925534,0.0000066795756,0.000030991687,0.10326126,0.000008055418,2.9758522e-7,0.00024343462,0.059468843,0.00008125777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036633614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6364879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59985423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004977109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012025913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110815999","doi":"10.1177/0894318409344765","title":"Theorizing Family","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Nursing Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0228561047500061,"score_gpt":0.3094319232765503,"score_spread":0.2865758185265442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110815999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073450385,0.0003213928,0.0016864093,0.474489,0.008790439,0.00051154767,0.00002986276,0.0004950754,0.5063312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.148917,0.000023660408,0.0034051763,0.82610077,0.0131139625,0.000017653938,0.00004764892,0.000087372326,0.008286754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940344,0.0002990421,0.000414932,0.0010555602,0.0023566317,0.00183945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998197,0.00014749779,0.00026347284,0.00073555316,0.00040180323,0.00025463142],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019123864,0.00041223792,0.00042825603,0.0005884289,0.0026218353,0.0011996366,0.0021467458,0.0008116119,0.000027953633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008913097,0.00041737608,0.00018811508,0.0017757994,0.004075955,0.00083135994,0.0000028600425,0.001572446,0.00013814839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046502887,0.000085945976,0.00013890116,0.000018214236,0.000010842579,0.00012088499,0.15447772,0.0000034576292,0.00069222006,0.043247104,0.67118776,0.13001232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035292006,0.0007522823,0.0063742856,0.0007097585,0.000105882544,0.000015760323,0.18073332,0.0002453949,0.000006035064,0.09831375,0.7106246,0.0017660101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054845435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044709283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49804446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093941286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020470377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112681396","doi":"","title":"THREE ESSAYS ON INCOME AND WEALTH","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Public economics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.015538556965250196,"score_gpt":0.24264751873877793,"score_spread":0.22710896177352774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112681396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76602566,0.00020490112,0.000050115486,0.000073343544,0.000867565,0.0002754268,0.00006322413,0.000113734626,0.23232603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438629,0.008176656,0.0001189801,0.00012684683,0.0002681033,0.0000011376685,0.00045345057,0.000047120695,0.04694476],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983264,0.00011625568,0.00015379238,0.00049415254,0.0004812049,0.00042816537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990118,0.00010531308,0.0001763111,0.0002757595,0.0001617731,0.00026904832],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016028549,0.00027935032,0.00032422683,0.0005014545,0.0010509673,0.000053486358,0.00047332628,0.0005688852,0.00007243568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042484306,0.0003338613,0.00011036439,0.0007224674,0.00020327704,0.00020767133,0.000039099377,0.00046325946,0.000057271584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013210622,0.000100956946,0.92607045,0.000084705025,0.000077479446,0.00020399906,0.0021778431,0.00001542873,5.1153916e-7,0.061483458,0.007638825,0.002014252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014618961,0.00023578298,0.20181432,0.00023422709,0.00019489716,5.9585687e-9,0.4897196,0.00006955726,0.000009279684,0.0049886447,0.30006257,0.001209208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005265035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7439514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7386863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030682393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005369757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114199029","doi":"10.1257/jep.21.2.27","title":"Marriage and Divorce: Changes and their Driving Forces","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic Perspectives","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":796,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remarriage; Cohabitation; Fertility; Demographic economics; Economics; Falling (accident); Marriage market; Birth control; Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Population; Family planning; Geography; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.01658257215021227,"score_gpt":0.27368597506282294,"score_spread":0.2571034029126107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114199029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856092,0.0039585624,0.00042883892,0.0013732406,0.00022678197,0.00006185104,0.000002290874,0.00000690361,0.008332384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919498,0.0070467605,0.00008523332,0.00006334535,0.0005464868,2.2193599e-7,5.498798e-8,0.0000064423893,0.00030168716],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999435,0.00008742425,0.0001481465,0.00008038901,0.00005650397,0.00019251449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999245,0.00036383382,0.00018727122,0.000067070345,0.000044651784,0.00009216178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020753222,0.00008179782,0.00015434981,0.000078460005,0.0003900934,0.000066990586,0.00016894846,0.000043645912,0.00002439732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005537756,0.000053563916,0.00003294508,0.00003679395,0.00041851186,0.00019502293,0.000042691663,0.00012576736,8.983711e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067858724,0.000028585222,0.08418538,0.000007533887,0.00016824853,0.0000041889184,0.85031396,0.00002527747,0.0014109247,0.05413986,0.00017152973,0.009476681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002438212,0.00008425111,0.1629994,0.0000154971,0.000023291755,0.0000293957,0.8229137,0.00012058267,0.000033011005,0.012169171,0.0012675148,0.00010036728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002762735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006509362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07881404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011273386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005412961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36323765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114726073","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.296921","title":"Caring and Sharing: Tests between Alternative Models of Intra-Household Allocation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.046415045092264365,"score_gpt":0.27573879604185403,"score_spread":0.22932375094958968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114726073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811101,0.0016700635,0.0119542815,0.0003082529,0.000101764716,0.00009796901,0.0000026194034,0.00002542432,0.0047295033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98952746,0.009476759,0.00010470602,0.000025660509,0.00030889764,0.0000014514277,0.0000010320656,0.000014150676,0.0005398903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982065,0.00006630479,0.00023240139,0.00016582961,0.0003119914,0.0010169803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994906,0.000052209303,0.0001606045,0.000095623895,0.00010342306,0.00009753311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010813661,0.000097481134,0.00015486285,0.000097411146,0.00030987337,0.000059846985,0.00027545277,0.00007953171,0.0000052496393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050151855,0.00009749501,0.00004390516,0.00018321461,0.0001080529,0.0003389737,0.00003549814,0.000683918,0.0000013841081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006288243,0.00006746231,0.2191285,0.000010334792,0.00020721805,0.0000018293101,0.029131452,0.0031434556,0.00022284128,0.73170644,0.000021723747,0.016352462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007109593,0.00020382527,0.021904308,0.00004400133,0.00008767612,0.000021807748,0.023192434,0.016564397,0.000043736305,0.9367694,0.00015439371,0.00030301648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013817189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033330852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20506302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048449717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032868964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3975731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115645139","doi":"10.1177/0734371x11428616","title":"Pay Equity in the States","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Public Personnel Administration","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pay Equity; Equity (law); Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Public sector; Gender pay gap; Economics; Panel data; State (computer science); Private sector; Labour economics; Political science; Wage; Economic growth; Econometrics; Law","score_opus":0.13865380976857575,"score_gpt":0.3757645020480285,"score_spread":0.23711069227945278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115645139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47240558,0.03708366,0.0023045612,0.020038666,0.00082675234,0.0023915297,0.00008842743,0.00012341976,0.4647374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95932215,0.039253514,0.00030298086,0.00085924665,0.00007035593,0.000026710979,0.000033045002,0.0000039300025,0.00012806343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847883,0.0004676525,0.00029775064,0.00013946953,0.0003845435,0.00023175859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993795,0.00007262315,0.00015771727,0.0001886085,0.00013784284,0.00006369988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034487802,0.000079497215,0.0001617069,0.00004013286,0.0001542414,0.000053637246,0.0003829799,0.000055138735,0.00021083042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046757178,0.0000498718,0.00007253828,0.00044047556,0.00015784487,0.0002794125,0.000020123349,0.0001043859,0.000011020204],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000901768,0.00087188353,0.070033185,0.0037163869,0.000034141613,0.00001393038,0.2529878,1.9878509e-7,0.000021737742,0.62307465,0.002769112,0.046467964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059325225,0.00058419624,0.28817183,0.0023042394,0.00012567628,0.000012673177,0.50850856,0.00020337234,0.000015960168,0.015942406,0.18284634,0.0006915106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006751635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026351644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60713226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052380365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000516614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23084453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115687927","doi":"10.18740/s42k57","title":"Feminist Mothering: Challenging Gender Inequality by Resisting the Institution of Motherhood and Raising Children to be Critical Agents of Social Change.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Gender studies; Sociology; Feminism; Institution; Resistance (ecology); Feminist philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.18094021086358777,"score_gpt":0.4101433897189013,"score_spread":0.22920317885531352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115687927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97226936,0.0017775357,0.00037526764,0.01880683,0.00023996308,0.00037042145,0.00010666778,0.000046025125,0.006007923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749166,0.00037179195,0.0001015671,0.0016227721,0.00036471378,0.0000099547715,0.000003028772,0.000009183759,0.00002535276],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985863,0.00022316723,0.00030278135,0.00020700676,0.0003797205,0.0003010507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938166,0.00018565566,0.00013962372,0.000091730944,0.00015023207,0.00005109549],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009888001,0.00013325969,0.00031447245,0.00003834792,0.0017805649,0.00003204601,0.00016153704,0.0000962518,0.000003204897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008963449,0.000118008196,0.000070545255,0.00024052638,0.00080621586,0.00007427261,0.000077031356,0.00009898222,2.4263326e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015518028,0.00011089094,0.0411405,0.00007140921,0.00014486039,5.204819e-7,0.7266864,0.0000024644867,0.00016428244,0.2287259,0.00068508537,0.0022521364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039501837,0.000070548056,0.68877184,0.00006309529,0.000109584056,2.9895017e-7,0.29366484,0.00001332471,0.000031273557,0.015560083,0.0010228792,0.000297215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009284955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032739522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64763135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009277508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049098144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116675714","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Income Support Programs on Labour Market Behaviour in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Entitlement (fair division); Income Support; Government (linguistics); Labour economics; Unemployment; Economics; Business; Demographic economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.0132115234321159,"score_gpt":0.28061848268681283,"score_spread":0.26740695925469693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116675714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.882122,0.000010605845,0.0000017921784,0.00008493657,0.00016570353,0.00018629227,0.000012851136,0.000009000495,0.117406815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99296033,0.00005376523,0.000051964747,0.000054165077,0.000012224353,0.000007921079,0.0000015895295,0.0000060567327,0.0068519944],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883235,0.0001795955,0.00018118882,0.00011138428,0.00032813186,0.00036737122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995094,0.0001036885,0.000055974702,0.0001596209,0.00006937175,0.00010193829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007689021,0.00008128982,0.000112953356,0.000027070413,0.00015723954,0.000031321833,0.00021099167,0.000047174362,0.00033279383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011161507,0.00005197895,0.000047601887,0.00034647045,0.00007858795,0.000042409614,0.000011413719,0.00010116977,0.0000022645793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052419236,0.000043124404,0.9854291,0.0000013832134,0.000006417742,0.0000049844775,0.0008690958,0.00001240996,0.0000010142118,0.011936685,0.0010181782,0.00067237276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014972052,0.000062152394,0.98236316,0.0000034238456,0.000002205455,3.79072e-7,0.01511903,0.0000191588,0.0000031718198,0.0007710364,0.0014299265,0.00007663016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98693365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99727917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11083832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051730213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032492538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5764037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116802228","doi":"10.1007/s12114-012-9144-4","title":"Wealth Affirming Policies for Women of Color","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Black Political Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Asset (computer security); Focus (optics); Joint (building); Basic income; Financial stability; Low income; Business; Economics; Public economics; Demographic economics; Financial system; Market economy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.03757432133061691,"score_gpt":0.34378278768204057,"score_spread":0.3062084663514237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116802228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3304776,0.019706303,0.00033432283,0.019288596,0.00033475755,0.0019474215,0.00011021272,0.000035910864,0.6277649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98876697,0.006106966,0.00023269854,0.0039790752,0.00036373056,0.000054543256,0.0000023433302,0.000009448988,0.0004842172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854386,0.00015236101,0.00041032687,0.00008392873,0.00009491375,0.00071459543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987298,0.0005422023,0.00016956434,0.00020623558,0.00010841297,0.00024374879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018537319,0.00008735703,0.0004076157,0.000025471054,0.00011596254,0.000007693249,0.0002793583,0.000050387214,0.000081843384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032970318,0.00006356395,0.00013135678,0.00011074639,0.00069370074,0.00010473481,0.000043618526,0.00005887539,0.000019417645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020400955,0.000041219024,0.0014295707,0.0022848232,0.000018390403,1.0894435e-8,0.004873178,2.6308257e-7,0.000001511008,0.99055946,0.00044409142,0.00034545237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034031793,0.00014492475,0.0074449885,0.0010615512,0.00012021369,0.0000010305037,0.046531755,0.000062700405,0.00003681372,0.09795762,0.84602237,0.00027568653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028852667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021444943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89260185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015074597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002744417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25920627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118017052","doi":"10.7201/earn.2006.11.05","title":"Distribución de bienestar económico entre Estados Miembros ante distintas opciones de desacoplamiento en el marco de la nueva PAC - Consecuencias para España","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Decoupling (probability); Welfare economics; Economics; Welfare; Partial equilibrium; Member states; Dilemma; Microeconomics; General equilibrium theory; International economics; European union; Market economy; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.01915982113225727,"score_gpt":0.2866791813888335,"score_spread":0.26751936025657624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118017052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849191,0.0015226196,0.0007173864,0.0006354231,0.0007624665,0.0006201944,0.0004789788,0.00025900814,0.010084834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919195,0.0018138712,0.004135445,0.0003622485,0.00039619987,0.00007507371,0.0001597204,0.000056369314,0.0010815468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582833,0.0011825417,0.0005782558,0.0007363343,0.0002692495,0.0014052958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973282,0.0010683695,0.0003536181,0.00047289865,0.00014456228,0.0006323512],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001681033,0.00050155714,0.0005397242,0.00020427305,0.0007721722,0.0002834168,0.000958525,0.00067524135,0.00034465626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077371637,0.000506753,0.00029987007,0.00038567046,0.00094657403,0.0005597723,0.0001359677,0.00063039945,0.00009521963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018504164,0.0003173029,0.85684437,0.000088810695,0.00020404828,0.00017265246,0.05901036,0.000041739015,0.000978218,0.077081054,0.002522648,0.0025537517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014996483,0.00016276819,0.87421536,0.0002015299,0.00026008056,0.00013261005,0.03255837,0.0010490338,0.001221082,0.061853413,0.025383152,0.0014629333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006865622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007390666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02645199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010548366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013145931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118721154","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1279674","title":"Dynamic Labour Supply Effects of Childcare Subsidies: Evidence from a Canadian Natural Experiment on Low-Fee Universal Child Care","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Natural experiment; Subsidy; Labour economics; Labour supply; Economics; Business; Child care; Demographic economics; Medicine; Market economy; Nursing","score_opus":0.004194115574359449,"score_gpt":0.2290283347420449,"score_spread":0.22483421916768545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118721154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9681363,0.029089762,0.000048566417,0.00060931477,0.0008517876,0.0002951639,0.000038346927,0.00003305318,0.00089767814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97462314,0.024475953,0.00004871095,0.00016444267,0.0002114965,0.000004603814,0.000019690451,0.00002838108,0.00042359898],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621606,0.0002628895,0.000264754,0.00033497924,0.00066885276,0.0022524896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988455,0.0001355194,0.00017275132,0.0002474139,0.0002560987,0.00034269656],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003484388,0.00025863075,0.00031017623,0.00023556458,0.0013088081,0.00004594,0.00066742784,0.00017697211,0.000030909305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016863357,0.00025135593,0.00019069668,0.000384718,0.0002419965,0.00028134199,0.000031637617,0.0015480411,0.000014855261],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043044225,0.0003455308,0.22906448,0.00013582058,0.0011637593,0.0005224785,0.63343805,0.0007700885,0.0023750921,0.12393191,0.00023025609,0.0075921207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029328668,0.0013783706,0.42832908,0.0011599489,0.00015296646,0.00014107992,0.5563652,0.00019166581,0.00074178854,0.005902516,0.0014937746,0.0012107351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2650271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76065314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49562603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053059226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008156326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118964805","doi":"10.25336/p6bs5x","title":"The changing impact of conjugal status and motherhood on employment across generations of Canadian women","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"General Social Survey; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Demography; Sociology; Gender studies; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.053901059833217246,"score_gpt":0.3584983415059613,"score_spread":0.3045972816727441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118964805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973749,0.00082376355,0.0000011454202,0.00012838913,0.00028362533,0.0001753177,0.00011837049,0.000002963275,0.0010915278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924624,0.00048392493,0.000015713189,0.00005590286,0.000073964715,0.000014906783,0.000008767977,0.000005963565,0.00009460748],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989715,0.00006967378,0.00015711981,0.000072050345,0.00010899396,0.0006206386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944144,0.000055328957,0.00006114927,0.00008792329,0.00007096286,0.0002831909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005280701,0.00006563123,0.00011501854,0.00026087105,0.00062276254,0.000015037134,0.00005311039,0.000044244895,0.0000045792667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013816943,0.00005447989,0.000020236486,0.0004289605,0.00015254739,0.000077879755,0.00000926269,0.00004405556,4.229329e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015879967,0.0000042201136,0.8156127,0.0000027065769,0.000030572955,1.6828028e-7,0.17148873,0.00022010531,0.000002290684,0.0115112085,0.000047148118,0.0010785547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009343632,0.000025503861,0.8816979,0.00000889864,0.000003411491,7.848567e-8,0.11697593,0.000053722208,8.2843235e-7,0.00040921598,0.00067626825,0.000054823307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9496221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06608518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016264912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003394884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47898486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119055680","doi":"10.1086/587760","title":"Child‐Care Policy and the Labor Supply of Mothers with Young Children: A Natural Experiment from Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":384,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Natural experiment; Government (linguistics); Demographic economics; Economics; Labour economics; Day care; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.004662708707808862,"score_gpt":0.21178380504913255,"score_spread":0.2071210963413237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119055680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99281746,0.003170067,0.0000024166332,0.0022390953,0.00034364295,0.00014167881,0.00021346103,0.0000037232762,0.0010684782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99506354,0.003189002,0.00042689234,0.00069242256,0.00054044055,0.0000014146202,0.000004547761,0.000014679827,0.00006703647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990429,0.00008408016,0.0003516979,0.000116138166,0.00018691781,0.00021823467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990003,0.00009099907,0.00043610524,0.00013889003,0.00020806043,0.00012563824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017378498,0.000127484,0.0003177,0.000061253966,0.00030622073,0.00004017087,0.00030222975,0.000055469696,0.000012979933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049726812,0.00008701474,0.00006171923,0.00013854976,0.00040791536,0.00016625974,0.000025340933,0.00019356413,2.164474e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002804797,0.000036932826,0.8894939,0.0000043713726,0.00031438618,0.000013937317,0.098207645,0.0005410514,0.000018147251,0.010508191,0.00026548016,0.0003154835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002882824,0.00008180468,0.9166777,0.000028103123,0.000049651528,0.00006884266,0.077753946,0.000056002984,0.000109084765,0.00020349865,0.0018957703,0.00019276055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4722823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5137284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041446082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037192326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022220784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5312318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W211947739","doi":"","title":"Estimating the Impact of the Québec’s Work Incentive Program on Labour Supply: An Ex Post Microsimulation Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microsimulation; Labour supply; Economics; Subsidy; Reservation wage; Work (physics); Substitution effect; Labour economics; Margin (machine learning); Macro; Wage; Macro level; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.02970762604044545,"score_gpt":0.3694817308867722,"score_spread":0.33977410484632675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W211947739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99181557,0.000037714843,0.0000044897142,0.00045427182,0.00025320373,0.0017026522,0.00012585697,0.000032136068,0.0055740816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977816,0.00039747334,0.00066607905,0.000041561176,0.0001961715,0.00013475594,0.00007179046,0.000032232638,0.000678369],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631876,0.0012783069,0.0005685219,0.0006363306,0.0004608651,0.00073724135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697965,0.0007945703,0.00044819582,0.0011296861,0.00048964034,0.00015826483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027491709,0.00026771968,0.0004705441,0.00034236343,0.00071590935,0.00043563513,0.0014433807,0.00039138124,0.00010128226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084841624,0.00018114418,0.0004826765,0.00089900795,0.0009061996,0.00014909275,0.0006083481,0.0013153566,0.0000057143316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003932482,0.00027115393,0.5446934,0.000019654297,0.00034000986,6.513575e-7,0.01650833,0.38438916,0.000020173822,0.00031135007,0.000010319169,0.05339648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015736683,0.000094380855,0.8959596,0.00007914925,0.000047329784,9.587752e-8,0.0088539515,0.09338729,0.0000036017834,0.0010650972,0.00013987743,0.0002122411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12479352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09933332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3512662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019656292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022651919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9171015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119684438","doi":"10.2307/3552511","title":"Strong Employment, Low Inflation: How Has the US Economy Done So Well?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inflation (cosmology); Economics; Keynesian economics; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.027409704936256052,"score_gpt":0.2566251538111541,"score_spread":0.22921544887489803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119684438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2781685,0.00012368325,0.000028263245,0.22755265,0.0002560463,0.0003419971,0.0000863751,0.000074410564,0.4933681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640261,0.00009283383,0.000019755173,0.008867836,0.0015228494,0.000026285577,0.00003425207,0.000019007877,0.025391078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983299,0.00013309994,0.00015910779,0.0002439347,0.00017917644,0.00095480465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847597,0.00004255313,0.000059030393,0.00037643014,0.00009204561,0.00095399696],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036776238,0.0001489413,0.00013546008,0.00025711884,0.0019754993,0.001413749,0.0005829239,0.0001487997,0.0012475057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000852744,0.00013513041,0.00007551514,0.000705584,0.000590391,0.00053809397,0.000017199069,0.00017822329,0.000280358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024709311,0.000030690688,0.099436745,0.0000080722475,0.00008986232,0.000012277679,0.016571146,0.00009543681,0.0000014933057,0.69614434,0.13378966,0.0538178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016270514,0.000008592858,0.050956845,0.0000024008316,0.00000565882,0.0000014124139,0.0016144171,0.00013441054,3.6637275e-7,0.0021366365,0.9448148,0.00016174266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6930322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9305604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81102514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009419954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010529131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120002944","doi":"10.7202/602305ar","title":"Comportements d’utilisation du temps non marchand des familles au Québec et au Canada : une modélisation sur les microdonnées du budget-temps de 1986 et de 1992","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.038390016746249776,"score_gpt":0.2578893798166748,"score_spread":0.21949936307042503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120002944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97273964,0.0005104049,0.0049826186,0.015794951,0.00071091205,0.0005752637,0.00024360375,0.000070642214,0.0043719853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905311,0.0025105798,0.00085315463,0.0042248843,0.00066832657,0.000035905494,0.00024833568,0.000048226048,0.0008794984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615735,0.0011548833,0.0008052649,0.0006024387,0.0002457279,0.0010343599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997824,0.0007280548,0.0004517865,0.00034405425,0.00021927239,0.0004328246],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021561151,0.0005010376,0.0005429238,0.00012863743,0.0010879231,0.0001911491,0.0004816349,0.00042308614,0.000037762686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037637466,0.00056733284,0.00016078587,0.00031905304,0.00055096514,0.0006728358,0.00007728555,0.00035414696,0.000007697297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006626792,0.00031900266,0.7088888,0.00017255347,0.00012637449,0.000019984736,0.17467043,0.0047012498,0.001391987,0.100111954,0.00066600274,0.008865346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095979444,0.00015184261,0.9059334,0.00022106439,0.000088920235,0.000014171277,0.041120473,0.0069266823,0.0003309525,0.006873576,0.036666457,0.0007126553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99950653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19704455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069513395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014276232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120121927","doi":"10.7202/602119ar","title":"Individus, familles et bien-être social","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.048153840424213785,"score_gpt":0.29453327782279287,"score_spread":0.2463794373985791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120121927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86935246,0.0018176921,0.0003594472,0.03362697,0.0022213506,0.0003907057,0.00031353868,0.0001817512,0.0917361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95027614,0.0024401806,0.0006368111,0.01997127,0.0019255095,0.000016444956,0.00009164228,0.000042793763,0.024599237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966304,0.0008182511,0.0006288012,0.00066148123,0.0002166475,0.0010444246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846804,0.00041153084,0.00030933795,0.0003367932,0.00013251977,0.00034174853],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011515581,0.0004732933,0.00059218396,0.00014317415,0.0007868183,0.0003015343,0.0006971184,0.0008937152,0.0004371045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001990911,0.00053361576,0.00034033807,0.0005235006,0.0007003996,0.00067444204,0.00009417275,0.0006031224,0.00034453924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013290252,0.00027308724,0.0073119155,0.000021690035,0.00008594746,0.000015154853,0.08283603,0.000032672076,0.000052292282,0.86709315,0.0065933783,0.03567139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009395432,0.00023461293,0.28106964,0.00008945563,0.000118956166,0.0000074694367,0.031942267,0.00022831922,0.000034228342,0.17662692,0.50754756,0.0011610118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017027834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018257882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6904662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004211609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007078154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120489314","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.291170","title":"The Timing of Births: A Marriage Market Analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Economics; Actuarial science; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.01117477911354434,"score_gpt":0.2700292208311287,"score_spread":0.2588544417175843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120489314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90026075,0.0049382844,0.014677546,0.0017356013,0.0003935789,0.00014462002,0.000003887997,0.00003585304,0.07780989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9523238,0.035845727,0.00006397991,0.000050078837,0.00023912358,0.000001794246,8.1169907e-7,0.000009164677,0.01146551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970899,0.00031756915,0.00028395886,0.00012642755,0.0004512631,0.0017308621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919564,0.00018664924,0.00021118866,0.00017266234,0.00014417664,0.00008970628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049394583,0.000095631876,0.0001790842,0.00015249135,0.0010205808,0.00009382998,0.00047366737,0.000072666655,0.00014320493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018800821,0.00006977734,0.0002371908,0.0011535712,0.00016759157,0.00012151882,0.000025773625,0.00071055535,0.0000055754176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014890768,0.00014211595,0.41842845,0.0000051736833,0.003424141,0.000016103644,0.012969224,0.00031144408,0.000117233154,0.5137695,0.0010001935,0.049667474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010766272,0.00028741284,0.121352606,0.000020555151,0.0012978684,0.000090528534,0.29139715,0.004624447,0.0000053125336,0.5152065,0.064077094,0.0005639005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092178833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041226707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29707584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004837354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017475142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9762684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121001091","doi":"10.1111/1468-232x.00289","title":"Child Care Subsidies, Welfare Reforms, and Lone Mothers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Punitive damages; Welfare; Welfare reform; Social Welfare; Labour economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Child care; Public economics; Political science; Market economy; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.026387222764910484,"score_gpt":0.24985400908845504,"score_spread":0.22346678632354455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121001091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8612883,0.003253995,0.00026914748,0.0029993681,0.0005498588,0.00020831941,0.00002109818,0.000012703241,0.1313972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971157,0.0015815519,0.0005563098,0.00011982137,0.0002885063,0.000001295478,0.0000023751954,0.000006868047,0.00032759525],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922264,0.0000942105,0.00030497514,0.00010335364,0.000098893586,0.00017592614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932945,0.000073246534,0.00023052526,0.00006490123,0.00014435542,0.00015753746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006453253,0.00008851145,0.00017946285,0.000039604296,0.0010288638,0.000094388,0.00007419544,0.0002784041,0.00006923407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014275945,0.00007950534,0.00011264792,0.000142302,0.00021966963,0.0003623552,0.000011197838,0.00040963254,9.3475364e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030534182,0.000085533444,0.38874903,0.000018331773,0.00040724975,0.0000064791057,0.21471842,0.00032847538,0.0000029734335,0.38516292,0.0039495723,0.00654048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022489456,0.000113515525,0.016351378,0.00004593239,0.000101789265,0.00002831008,0.43907905,0.000033955555,0.0000031196105,0.0041920464,0.537567,0.00023493836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015491144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015647692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53361744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015579589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002886695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79132926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121258717","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-4085.2005.00289.x","title":"Using Engel curves to estimate bias in the Canadian CPI as a cost of living index","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Engel curve; Economics; Cost of living; Index (typography); Econometrics; Welfare; Price index; Consumer price index (South Africa); Macroeconomics; Monetary policy","score_opus":0.21852199597648553,"score_gpt":0.27408786097930116,"score_spread":0.05556586500281563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121258717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98552567,0.00047635534,0.000035296558,0.0067473287,0.0007236031,0.0004858007,0.00013008324,0.0000032857372,0.0058725914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949269,0.00019376617,0.0006164857,0.0035569787,0.0005239993,0.00001019921,0.0000029364119,0.000033798835,0.00013490334],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974499,0.00025688644,0.00088005373,0.00026949306,0.000012784547,0.0011309267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995848,0.00044946154,0.0004888638,0.00033216522,0.0002866502,0.0025948505],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030842852,0.00023896023,0.00052647106,0.0011307433,0.0005013256,0.00020411942,0.0010637484,0.00022328735,0.00017794705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016410841,0.00026513205,0.00015961434,0.0004171873,0.00026098994,0.0004795876,0.000017670476,0.00045144706,0.000012065104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023849083,0.000034092544,0.43070707,0.00007107673,0.00015830656,0.0002494959,0.10302737,0.1431928,0.000007266256,0.31620583,0.0014350864,0.0048877546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002056422,0.0010196826,0.41221735,0.00631016,0.00046021276,0.001513446,0.14302975,0.049989946,0.000033673958,0.078511626,0.3006238,0.0042339433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98655367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2991887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005355648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016812969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121913503","doi":"","title":"Assessing the Impact of Tax and Transfer Policies on Labour Supply: A Survey","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CIRANO Project Reports","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour supply; Economics; Welfare; Labour economics; Public economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.06926373667263801,"score_gpt":0.3627267473177183,"score_spread":0.2934630106450803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121913503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814868,0.00025341683,0.00005051339,0.0001438897,0.00017430978,0.00038212613,0.000038800546,0.000037620302,0.017432531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835926,0.00031051223,0.000026316435,0.00007510452,0.000086439824,0.0000098604605,0.0000057063544,0.000014978225,0.001111814],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983262,0.0004026238,0.00031372835,0.00024191053,0.0003691165,0.00034643896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918866,0.00020888202,0.00011335799,0.0002780212,0.00014534341,0.000065707965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015661437,0.0001428856,0.00023251788,0.000096056,0.00040781952,0.0001875048,0.00011753132,0.00011019488,0.000054043845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032639253,0.00009466528,0.00010933175,0.000506111,0.0003236099,0.00019617363,0.000015810534,0.00014286576,0.0000010152152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004714952,0.00009160167,0.95528114,0.000014735522,0.00004154923,0.00003431207,0.040707704,0.000018873046,0.000370038,0.0006158058,0.00080398127,0.0020155353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011666445,0.00007657964,0.9929254,0.00002190465,0.000014310424,0.0000260382,0.005627111,0.00007761709,0.00003830202,0.00029264818,0.00064764067,0.00013577339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068587996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040534395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06453456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065958564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026930514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9376144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122832781","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1053","title":"Disability, Poverty, and the Income Tax: The Case for Refundable Credits","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tax credit; Earned income tax credit; Public economics; Tax reform; Tax avoidance; Government (linguistics); Tax policy; Income tax; Poverty; Business; Direct tax; Work (physics); Indirect tax; State income tax; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03311607088496121,"score_gpt":0.34014681382515677,"score_spread":0.30703074294019556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122832781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8866138,0.00031989402,0.00006565919,0.08522741,0.00039087015,0.00027162593,0.000036939116,0.0000083745845,0.027065422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99064153,0.0005613825,0.000040861247,0.004267575,0.0037989635,0.0000030989363,3.4645512e-7,0.000006722495,0.00067951175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898136,0.00024795326,0.00024580248,0.00007570594,0.00020351294,0.00024566913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911773,0.00039508476,0.00018149104,0.000069068454,0.00014590763,0.00009072508],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016771815,0.00008031835,0.0002038903,0.000018849776,0.0020373943,0.00019792328,0.00017525902,0.0000925839,0.0000044470494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002147695,0.000043371307,0.0001127206,0.00013089576,0.0013415196,0.00018925789,0.00005183607,0.00017091997,3.15775e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085810694,0.000036568214,0.0035034409,0.000011222214,0.000036864418,0.000016585169,0.03413912,8.443638e-7,0.0000021398923,0.9590504,0.0018877529,0.0012292418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003202424,0.00015512695,0.020525865,0.000013596741,0.0001406632,0.0005007838,0.05318298,0.000080018115,6.7627917e-7,0.5858009,0.3361944,0.0002025584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018028403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014482767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3732495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000764447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017438078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123013074","doi":"10.7202/602240ar","title":"Dépendance à l’égard de l’aide sociale et réforme de la sécurité du revenu","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03295631347499372,"score_gpt":0.28925392106144565,"score_spread":0.2562976075864519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123013074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8754807,0.001984632,0.0017035843,0.025677217,0.00094622397,0.00033714346,0.0001479589,0.00015050419,0.09357204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9308249,0.010243121,0.004988096,0.020840975,0.0017312471,0.000023175584,0.000024381248,0.000052420317,0.031271737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961943,0.0013435574,0.0005624037,0.00053264585,0.00015207872,0.0012150223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978678,0.0007963681,0.0002976503,0.00038503137,0.00011404302,0.00053907],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031585356,0.00039904343,0.00053586945,0.00007849302,0.00058599387,0.0002806862,0.0006653336,0.00085143826,0.00029074817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071512966,0.0004830331,0.000315613,0.00033730507,0.0006964707,0.0006766114,0.000074752636,0.00070149795,0.00015761695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028176,0.0002798029,0.027764149,0.00005386344,0.000064388994,0.00004256018,0.041506987,0.00017868468,0.00031538124,0.90979636,0.0056760595,0.014293602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006752559,0.0001308228,0.10448306,0.00012797088,0.000070899994,0.000039262755,0.005162606,0.00052503584,0.00015451851,0.34047294,0.547481,0.0006766045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005517907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004388163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5693234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007573558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028029252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124801476","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4932.2005.00257.x","title":"Demands for Child Care and Household Labour Supply in Australia*","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Record","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Tobit model; Labour supply; Constraint (computer-aided design); Child care; Budget constraint; Labour economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Bivariate analysis; Discrete choice; Medicine; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Nursing","score_opus":0.02707665362278264,"score_gpt":0.2791187295474646,"score_spread":0.2520420759246819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124801476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890888,0.00020047529,0.000020208305,0.0007252814,0.0004984507,0.00026923296,0.0001131178,0.0000311671,0.009053299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99402094,0.0005903611,0.0013338159,0.00021669074,0.00060662086,0.000027956095,0.000011932604,0.00001373799,0.0031779385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920416,0.000027482876,0.0001988951,0.00023218432,0.000035363675,0.0003019051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996806,0.000048821785,0.000055126256,0.00011192707,0.000012903396,0.00009064837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022878607,0.00009447012,0.00015843617,0.00006557406,0.00017355988,0.00007010359,0.000143179,0.00011178783,0.000089435285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015281825,0.00010658307,0.000046017798,0.00004259848,0.00006394539,0.00018153808,0.000019086312,0.00008411498,0.00002645887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017621282,0.000019303341,0.94771206,0.00002336394,0.000012357777,8.2236085e-7,0.014060793,0.00034985403,0.0000033648353,0.017757386,0.0029969704,0.017046103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010599208,0.00007282328,0.5102335,0.000016194846,0.00001080286,0.0000011983451,0.01525459,0.00030206473,0.000011001245,0.002224722,0.47049865,0.00031449925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004860206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10662007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4675017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021781251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007027351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9096818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124844761","doi":"","title":"Marriage, Fertility and Divorce: A Dynamic Equilibrium Analysis of Social Policy in Canada ¤ (Preliminary Version)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Social policy; Distribution (mathematics); Fertility; Style (visual arts); Demographic economics; Public economics; Sociology; Population; Market economy; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.008475243876776851,"score_gpt":0.26477169653965166,"score_spread":0.2562964526628748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124844761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708869,0.00005524415,0.000008919724,0.0009441667,0.000049534334,0.000101115584,0.00007427922,0.000015394775,0.027864465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970318,0.000067498135,0.00004277162,0.00021768425,0.000020675505,0.0000025872873,0.000021642341,0.000005192838,0.0025901538],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986573,0.00016570305,0.00025305894,0.00023314795,0.00034714933,0.00034364196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999583,0.00007508504,0.000048220125,0.0001367269,0.00004332918,0.00011362289],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002845306,0.0001024375,0.00028424343,0.00020013102,0.0001681126,0.000019257288,0.00019291151,0.00008764695,0.0011842893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046483176,0.000104612285,0.00007523003,0.0015806528,0.0001829025,0.00011523076,0.0000510017,0.000088202614,0.0000024374797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024355382,0.00013199609,0.9614157,0.000038417013,0.00030023165,0.000016088561,0.02373686,0.0009929503,0.00009265764,0.0022038848,0.00052924687,0.010298398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019361723,0.000014822037,0.97322375,0.0000020625296,0.00009372421,5.6575313e-8,0.013104897,0.01264749,8.0778614e-7,0.0002781374,0.000332817,0.00010782418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98504966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9919641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026144912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057688693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001363777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124849253","doi":"","title":"Assessing the Impact of Non- Response on the Treatment Effect in the Canadian Self-Sufficiency Experiment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Econometrics; Sample (material); Demographic economics; Treatment effect; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Economics; Statistics; Actuarial science; Mathematics; Medicine; Accounting","score_opus":0.02255144688103868,"score_gpt":0.30659665208560377,"score_spread":0.2840452052045651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124849253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744654,0.00078188983,0.000009688657,0.0009745339,0.0003960831,0.0014451725,0.00032048678,0.00001634643,0.021590354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971489,0.0020453169,0.000041538275,0.000052953153,0.000058786314,0.0000068271825,0.00007186082,0.000012865569,0.0005609695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995331,0.0024870234,0.0003784943,0.0006699591,0.0006483886,0.00048513315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959084,0.0014124645,0.0005711146,0.0017899676,0.00012745713,0.00019060039],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025830192,0.00038659948,0.00051224075,0.00018117603,0.0019260409,0.00028411543,0.0017407151,0.00027485873,0.000020115502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015247492,0.00022099391,0.0002169223,0.0002702462,0.00075032073,0.00024623188,0.00029703096,0.00040720508,0.0000018749106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031275174,0.007448717,0.56305414,0.00040583982,0.0064965514,0.0032970048,0.3138253,0.0040512676,0.001207518,0.008527174,0.077051975,0.011506954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003156608,0.0019059832,0.84775543,0.00050106994,0.0011480674,0.000025812727,0.09377449,0.0015493379,0.00008370764,0.00038755254,0.048654925,0.0010570128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79660666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5040112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29259545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023470158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021210362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125868487","doi":"10.1111/1468-0297.00657","title":"A Cournot-Nash Model of Family Decision Making*","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":277,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Chen; Cournot competition; Sociology; Economics; Mathematical economics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04605241700625577,"score_gpt":0.3094129373854106,"score_spread":0.2633605203791548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125868487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94228804,0.00021721504,0.015177966,0.00048092866,0.0006791296,0.000069153786,0.000007585393,0.000012110655,0.041067854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99487704,0.002112885,0.0015356676,0.00033743627,0.00042834054,9.17013e-7,2.2566768e-7,0.000010495353,0.0006969996],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900436,0.00008888054,0.0003413607,0.000103032224,0.0001730309,0.0002893121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992775,0.00015757015,0.0002373956,0.00017456162,0.0000623182,0.0000907107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015023412,0.000083955056,0.0001652319,0.00006538123,0.0005219355,0.00009376551,0.00054561754,0.00007241443,0.00013698313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050746014,0.00006324364,0.00011610054,0.000065625456,0.00018612073,0.00017273228,0.000044562894,0.00022488068,0.00006282815],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041718307,0.00020128652,0.1037787,0.000009048169,0.0002801645,0.00003003436,0.081503734,0.4924535,0.00087976234,0.19563916,0.028922452,0.09588499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014756051,0.0000982748,0.06175986,0.000100445424,0.000091246664,0.00012005234,0.04455481,0.34604362,0.0000052567966,0.52612334,0.019148067,0.00047944492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013140196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042723655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33048415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026955453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005289662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40143588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125884035","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.027","title":"Women, Substantive Equality, and Fiscal Policy: Gender-Based Analysis of Taxes, Benefits, and Budgets","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Gender equality; Sociology; Art; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0390689647909661,"score_gpt":0.2741626466090408,"score_spread":0.23509368181807472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125884035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.975631,0.008108218,0.000053805376,0.011942054,0.000571655,0.00015874278,0.00081130455,0.0000035211222,0.0027196712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942739,0.0023881972,0.00009974245,0.0018449965,0.00031144786,0.0000047250123,0.0000066855223,0.00002079008,0.0010494982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742335,0.00046831116,0.0006307328,0.0002747972,0.00027477863,0.0009280108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968656,0.0005072723,0.0005597437,0.00022332094,0.00024270531,0.0016014117],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034323551,0.00026812742,0.0009223325,0.0005376944,0.00051905384,0.00023415254,0.00034505842,0.00027080503,0.0001034517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024990528,0.00023487247,0.00018338407,0.0010748279,0.0027625714,0.0002547056,0.000044300334,0.00060328934,7.595223e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007361301,0.000040272855,0.06936146,0.00009278748,0.0010545383,0.00003341115,0.15159419,0.000099208126,0.000017646826,0.7741616,0.00005302391,0.003418277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065535414,0.00067840016,0.5143451,0.00023023537,0.0020567721,0.00017737164,0.15517947,0.00361418,0.000016579166,0.2832831,0.03269876,0.0011664939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056303274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5239407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49087846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004171475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012293055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126473761","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.931580","title":"Labor Unions, Operating Flexibility, and the Cost of Equity","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Labour economics; Equity (law); Business; Pay Equity; Economics; Political science; Management; Law","score_opus":0.022206040492252208,"score_gpt":0.32983154574858026,"score_spread":0.30762550525632804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126473761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732132,0.0048254286,0.0028536313,0.007453163,0.00017939553,0.00026994228,0.0000052809723,0.000021845153,0.011178131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889239,0.0097073605,0.000096342126,0.00042491613,0.00019047657,0.0000011347109,8.5482884e-7,0.0000042946403,0.0006507188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978851,0.00036262948,0.00023479883,0.00011502503,0.00031145924,0.0010909776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994194,0.000112115245,0.00011814672,0.00011917712,0.00015807599,0.000073067844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062444624,0.00008026239,0.0001569976,0.00003356501,0.0008131832,0.00009278716,0.00030854164,0.00006360869,0.000009439419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031400914,0.000054845903,0.00005635055,0.00023705351,0.0003280944,0.00014610738,0.000042367967,0.00081416976,0.0000012243586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018535837,0.000030361005,0.0076511744,0.0000014144002,0.000021325359,3.0963653e-7,0.0042903856,0.000041058356,0.00008306402,0.9704373,0.000020321719,0.017404735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014107769,0.00018545544,0.026902502,0.000015769743,0.000040226547,0.000028006894,0.06300477,0.00047544946,0.0000102414115,0.90658087,0.001204356,0.00014160879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068114727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065733385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063856475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003355637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022704883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.625443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126496750","doi":"10.17848/wp01-74","title":"Nonstandard Work and Child Care Choices of Married Mothers","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung; W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research","keywords":"Endogeneity; Child care; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Economics; Psychology; Medicine; Econometrics; Nursing","score_opus":0.022153136534665642,"score_gpt":0.3011380287549715,"score_spread":0.2789848922203058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126496750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019502483,0.0052027353,0.000100345074,0.00012336046,0.0010017231,0.00033788668,0.00012777973,0.00006969146,0.973534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8536429,0.05838029,0.000890066,0.00021973782,0.0013962691,0.00002136579,0.0001226054,0.00009569451,0.085231096],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790436,0.00007504562,0.00031535322,0.00034513266,0.0010166698,0.00034342287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987801,0.000066491775,0.00024716477,0.00025478523,0.0004945178,0.00015694856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005225997,0.00022376704,0.00045249055,0.00011870094,0.00033005845,0.000072728915,0.00026204277,0.0004919931,0.00033768037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013331084,0.0001980703,0.00012607788,0.00038218327,0.0004462447,0.00006366682,0.000051588486,0.0002425686,0.000002301794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036499583,0.000057007455,0.89829576,0.00043021952,0.00031639688,0.000023063925,0.04767124,0.000016762915,8.105186e-7,0.0045306506,0.013882655,0.034738958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002923208,0.000037047634,0.037372027,0.00034920996,0.00012035788,0.000002549432,0.07853821,9.074082e-7,0.0000011265877,0.00010938071,0.88273007,0.00044678722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009482907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016211309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8883029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022393369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013051144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99711305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127017084","doi":"10.7202/602224ar","title":"Choix occupationnels et offre de travail lorsque les salaires sont fonction des heures travaillées","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04856939666815891,"score_gpt":0.2929658958385832,"score_spread":0.24439649917042428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127017084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9666296,0.004338511,0.009517587,0.008052215,0.0010949472,0.00050433085,0.0001415157,0.00023008714,0.009491191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759192,0.0071919323,0.0022081167,0.003990737,0.0010743645,0.000024559837,0.00005565783,0.000049454924,0.00948597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962028,0.0011309364,0.00071557047,0.0006655667,0.00018878725,0.0010963035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981876,0.00045747845,0.00032436708,0.00038728697,0.00019259284,0.0004506612],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015358384,0.00050944823,0.00054334546,0.00015465495,0.00084407727,0.00036966952,0.00049870356,0.00076664233,0.00034710518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003620186,0.00055178325,0.00032011265,0.00033975692,0.000978623,0.0010389761,0.000036902435,0.0004925019,0.0000929599],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013732657,0.00081084523,0.07645724,0.00018733129,0.00020282732,0.000019742734,0.15444158,0.0040847016,0.00097110623,0.46079004,0.0062353387,0.29566193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009211148,0.00047610793,0.7787442,0.00021049973,0.00013917504,0.000022135839,0.029729746,0.0020441182,0.0004351204,0.11706934,0.069229715,0.0009786846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032081295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062079735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.702287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009794465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091653515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127044592","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2009.01217.x","title":"Models of Earning and Caring: Determinants of the Division of Work","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.06054783831255838,"score_gpt":0.2858788811100898,"score_spread":0.2253310427975314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127044592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8359758,0.15857685,0.000019609306,0.00325008,0.00059197494,0.00044285666,0.00022210367,0.000005380218,0.0009153172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9346567,0.06382951,0.0003847857,0.0007877015,0.00006641232,0.0000067801648,0.0000092522405,0.000015960142,0.00024289978],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964066,0.00095943577,0.0010338117,0.00038901376,0.000108750326,0.0011023764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968718,0.00052494433,0.0011065403,0.00051474315,0.00044942708,0.00053249166],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002563146,0.00029048667,0.0013378505,0.000120737306,0.00027924584,0.0000033535664,0.00085334026,0.00076185906,0.000030195719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015414614,0.0002643642,0.00040189893,0.0005394213,0.0043186564,0.00009615748,0.00008292571,0.0005138551,6.198591e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005390039,0.00004157928,0.8181806,0.005914274,0.00011852392,0.000012734582,0.06810192,0.0002742715,0.00010402745,0.08076655,0.00051758403,0.025962546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002778033,0.00031659813,0.9143948,0.010844413,0.0003597003,0.0000071130416,0.029806403,0.0003544643,0.000014270651,0.042119827,0.0011161213,0.00038847612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06675198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19212769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1253757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076806947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002326889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127054757","doi":"10.7202/600612ar","title":"Approches économiques de la fécondité","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.013871643164608254,"score_gpt":0.24220445818949318,"score_spread":0.22833281502488492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127054757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8601905,0.039228555,0.0016819022,0.0014256089,0.0013052654,0.0002933318,0.00006861133,0.0002579594,0.095548235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9076411,0.07242247,0.003844607,0.002755539,0.0011102353,0.00006496206,0.000022137554,0.00008464885,0.012054317],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962119,0.0009653358,0.0004770573,0.00064022176,0.00031113846,0.001394343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766195,0.00069577165,0.0002302571,0.00047923892,0.0001503121,0.00078249135],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013097407,0.00047790067,0.00051734666,0.00043030654,0.0013690542,0.00013234472,0.0007508937,0.0013099803,0.00011416813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003142961,0.00056740246,0.0005559585,0.001633418,0.0110095,0.00038663487,0.000053355372,0.00095462124,0.00006968636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003464654,0.00045896028,0.4318319,0.00015428741,0.00042496485,0.00038089833,0.18910925,0.00013961698,0.0002025577,0.33935216,0.025840444,0.012070324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009038538,0.00019024858,0.25978407,0.0001024568,0.0002864581,0.0002369996,0.06697122,0.00037031894,0.00010848084,0.049629174,0.6201081,0.0013086057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0368949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01645146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59426767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071845733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019142971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127428487","doi":"","title":"Social policy, gender inequality and poverty","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Affect (linguistics); Inequality; Independence (probability theory); Gender inequality; Sample (material); Economic independence; Demographic economics; Social security; Marital status; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Development economics; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.06063220528311757,"score_gpt":0.3379944886446476,"score_spread":0.27736228336153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127428487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00074580294,0.00016058209,0.0002850993,0.001305911,0.00028751092,0.00022787179,0.00007862987,0.00014089928,0.9967677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004019136,0.001325012,0.00011326218,0.0042883344,0.0038593698,0.0000049295777,0.000077847,0.000034617744,0.9862775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805105,0.0001609181,0.00027522427,0.00040204296,0.00059525075,0.0005154934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927515,0.00006488864,0.00013522133,0.00018141292,0.00014219806,0.00020114951],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005564078,0.00026634254,0.00037746376,0.00012547725,0.0007092462,0.00013011374,0.00028046963,0.00080760225,0.00040454444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007474906,0.00025328778,0.00013328603,0.00016890536,0.00040346227,0.00010968511,0.00012167729,0.0003382141,0.000055320117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044805392,0.000027751496,0.0026109756,0.000036548867,0.000055393237,0.000006330855,0.011825043,2.6366865e-7,5.742204e-7,0.70758754,0.27603537,0.0018097298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019411022,0.000010631357,0.010620513,0.0000049342357,0.000035945275,0.000001027577,0.002807512,0.000007864859,3.6252185e-8,0.14142348,0.84451294,0.00038103425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008228914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065789516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5684775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004297739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024260448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128588287","doi":"","title":"Life after teenage motherhood","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Educational attainment; Socioeconomic status; Psychology; Teenage pregnancy; Demographic economics; Developmental psychology; Population; Economics; Sociology; Demography; Economic growth","score_opus":0.02097033841046968,"score_gpt":0.2550498799298536,"score_spread":0.23407954151938393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128588287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5686751,0.00013264143,0.001086615,0.0008580882,0.00022353308,0.000081282466,0.0000036637791,0.00011036485,0.42882872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603436,0.00035648042,0.0007904151,0.0030706779,0.00021941442,0.0000070981087,8.9711807e-7,0.000008367036,0.035203047],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992698,0.000046818706,0.00009038608,0.0001289149,0.00022030874,0.00024380388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959433,0.000024630282,0.000017238312,0.00012649309,0.00003886198,0.00019845401],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001276377,0.000063314474,0.0000766831,0.0000287097,0.0002703892,0.000020719408,0.00013879406,0.00007431697,0.0010269347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075236356,0.000053478936,0.000046033856,0.00015857161,0.00015273239,0.00009633394,0.000019219255,0.000057718702,0.00032081406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014526194,0.00017832367,0.81016916,0.000007277436,0.00003709845,0.000053947562,0.08401815,0.000015652393,0.000048399168,0.058458615,0.04611367,0.0008851583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043245548,0.000038240087,0.71158934,0.0000046412347,0.000012385412,0.0000022567006,0.03195259,0.00017493338,0.000008417227,0.0024266313,0.25297555,0.00038256453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015068832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013162692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39362568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024186633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018873732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128710049","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2012.10.031","title":"A social work study on the impact of different factors on respect to women","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.04365043400354146,"score_gpt":0.32547251091165535,"score_spread":0.2818220769081139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128710049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847371,7.502649e-7,0.00004686409,0.004624904,0.0003479723,0.0007771543,0.00000211823,0.000032789092,0.009430332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978857,0.0000010267867,0.000009130371,0.0016486729,0.00012061154,0.0000416362,2.83699e-7,0.0000076783,0.00028526396],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973269,0.00019572253,0.00015619828,0.0002855528,0.0011955298,0.0008400885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993098,0.00010462292,0.00008048243,0.00031348626,0.000015394997,0.00017620657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017731929,0.00015646772,0.0001535438,0.00026481465,0.0011763503,0.00014385588,0.00089263456,0.000020895892,0.00005534347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064083695,0.00009366037,0.0000842688,0.0017879532,0.0004308884,0.00015041148,0.00016165627,0.0001129203,0.00003801837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002880964,0.00045257775,0.78686726,0.0000018785366,0.000047075628,0.0000012717463,0.19671951,0.00012454006,0.00023438476,0.011978982,0.0032054607,0.00033823476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010551973,0.00015965095,0.91663146,0.000005226602,0.0000071412987,5.9219305e-9,0.082659125,0.0000021472677,0.000007946012,0.000103541446,0.0002084422,0.00010978392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020921456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018291019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1297642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007765139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013352286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9047654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129152249","doi":"","title":"Gender Discrimination and Growth: Theory and Evidence from India","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":216,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Gender discrimination; Economics; Human capital; Inequality; Investment (military); Stigma (botany); Per capita; Demographic economics; Gender inequality; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Economic growth; Demography","score_opus":0.06807607560565652,"score_gpt":0.37441387728592884,"score_spread":0.3063378016802723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129152249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98865235,0.0010191388,0.00007469766,0.005636565,0.00020884203,0.00044957065,0.00025435555,0.000014044204,0.003690434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845212,0.012560276,0.001971938,0.0005351963,0.0003178443,0.000009782006,0.0000072502585,0.00001840397,0.000058092253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942846,0.00032473027,0.00094689394,0.0012738742,0.0005532797,0.0026166623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917583,0.002143346,0.00022315107,0.0004619529,0.0007462191,0.0046670274],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011800351,0.0003267837,0.0006558663,0.00081346196,0.0012348904,0.00089465396,0.0010100519,0.00026781744,0.00006262007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084446175,0.0003031955,0.000086532484,0.0007457995,0.017683743,0.0023816612,0.00090199686,0.0006420059,0.000010039093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005413547,0.00009194455,0.088509314,0.00004057014,0.000012940341,0.0000015302812,0.0007031918,0.000014900601,0.00046314538,0.90959305,0.0000038614717,0.0005114469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006303455,0.0002246022,0.4522075,0.00007660106,0.000024429555,0.000007048969,0.0060158614,0.0010240402,0.00040315866,0.5389998,0.00009942983,0.0002871502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019878667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018727622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3705932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083756284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004975097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131388306","doi":"10.1111/1471-6402.00034","title":"Family Forms and Member Well-Being: A Research Agenda for the Decade of Behavior","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychology of Women Quarterly","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Inequality; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.07685805361180939,"score_gpt":0.41470551259520344,"score_spread":0.3378474589833941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131388306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97618234,0.00025091931,0.0005023053,0.0009994254,0.00036621167,0.0005925473,0.000012795243,0.000016436063,0.021077042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976196,0.00042231585,0.00029424042,0.00029256736,0.00008761709,0.00020083651,0.0000022640152,0.000013932155,0.0010666194],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817604,0.000196977,0.00032660054,0.00027590993,0.00033743566,0.00068702485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987261,0.00048706154,0.0001160113,0.00031683026,0.00023459982,0.00011939451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026771887,0.00010481404,0.00023798487,0.00014805308,0.00037344953,0.00002265969,0.00042776085,0.00017957966,0.000060277187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000553508,0.00007997027,0.000070259455,0.00038383488,0.0010903426,0.00009925168,0.000016758791,0.00018636552,0.000006358683],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005061435,0.0008634465,0.22177568,0.00007450862,0.00021277965,0.000014559975,0.6102257,0.000001427358,0.0076954663,0.05886719,0.005962641,0.09380047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017097272,0.0021148876,0.5942019,0.000014950769,0.000049965944,0.000007736988,0.28874555,0.00003548659,0.000019524368,0.048501156,0.064375155,0.00022390384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005750502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004763174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37242627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056179164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008280653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4017413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131648638","doi":"10.1086/668282","title":"Status, Caste, and the Time Allocation of Women in Rural India","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Development and Cultural Change","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":205,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Caste; Autonomy; Hierarchy; Work (physics); Poverty; Demographic economics; Time allocation; Economics; Developing country; Survey data collection; Sociology; Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Development economics; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.026092577339204615,"score_gpt":0.24838412911706692,"score_spread":0.2222915517778623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131648638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99405795,0.00058316876,2.0819026e-7,0.00018235057,0.00013920845,0.00018110659,0.0000028413172,0.0000060635266,0.004847083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806994,0.00063719484,0.00006139703,0.0000893584,0.000093925475,0.000039180388,0.000012188132,0.0000027838782,0.0009940531],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993915,0.00004499652,0.0001309043,0.00006436535,0.000045315788,0.00032294347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978447,0.000026088603,0.000055866665,0.000031053805,0.000011220977,0.000091316055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000626254,0.00006251496,0.00011775242,0.000026299105,0.000115423216,0.00002700963,0.000051557938,0.00004023686,0.000045593795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010467976,0.000043352975,0.000008608084,0.000041832736,0.00012903861,0.000292583,0.000031625277,0.00003526005,0.000016200107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012265334,0.000010666669,0.3856686,0.0000073984156,0.000014020547,6.7334476e-8,0.60002583,1.5255335e-7,0.000009381858,0.0074166288,0.000060425675,0.00677452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005095685,0.0000060754905,0.8831639,0.0000070141423,0.0000026721796,4.7349698e-7,0.104672104,0.000025625706,0.000005396578,0.00012993839,0.011383229,0.00009399852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083724764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093190203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4974953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023171202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052218107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1767883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132118604","doi":"10.1257/aer.20161329","title":"The Impact of Family Income on Child Achievement: Evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit: Reply","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":449,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Earned income tax credit; Instrumental variable; Income tax; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Labour economics; Tax credit; Public economics","score_opus":0.04162224576709179,"score_gpt":0.3508961612993184,"score_spread":0.3092739155322266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132118604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9273874,0.033397004,0.000012528776,0.014046979,0.0005813971,0.0009284127,0.0001391975,0.00003179949,0.023475282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70484453,0.29307917,0.000034003348,0.0015800149,0.00025899234,0.000028682805,0.0000032759758,0.000014021205,0.00015728691],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787706,0.00053551304,0.0005896704,0.00037928578,0.00022348094,0.00039501363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955393,0.0010274686,0.0014334508,0.0018117621,0.000055287743,0.00013274295],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022879487,0.00021643356,0.000601493,0.000021234551,0.0016242855,0.00021727131,0.0021942812,0.000035299585,0.000056140896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011201353,0.00012439002,0.00035773456,0.00011120098,0.0015906601,0.00028948777,0.0002121091,0.0002391036,0.00016812758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059868897,0.000063133106,0.84521174,0.00008356993,0.00041054835,0.0000026218954,0.0033069432,0.00007785451,0.000014328873,0.004795707,0.009128785,0.1368449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011025242,0.00015227745,0.9547255,0.0011430926,0.000049704766,3.5667557e-7,0.0010791449,0.000034920085,6.3830043e-7,0.0005160075,0.04201751,0.0001706108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0914253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032807016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25968215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030567983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003773581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132545807","doi":"10.7202/040810ar","title":"State Policy, Livelihood Protection and Gender on Canada's East Coast","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Society for International Health","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Victoria","keywords":"Livelihood; Restructuring; Fishery; State (computer science); Resource (disambiguation); Geography; Business; Agriculture; Finance","score_opus":0.06110071612949833,"score_gpt":0.2999172391938083,"score_spread":0.23881652306430998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132545807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97378314,0.00070525653,0.000048557944,0.017004792,0.0015590085,0.00009749367,0.00008457419,0.0000056086383,0.006711601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943869,0.003216617,0.000060765462,0.0011298701,0.0006573884,0.000001979647,7.6823653e-7,0.0000064134524,0.000539265],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883896,0.00006118954,0.00020923284,0.00008437994,0.0005973298,0.00020892768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985586,0.00003896141,0.00014753628,0.00003628119,0.00095210853,0.00026651955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021250694,0.000083458974,0.00013007568,0.0005341045,0.0003884053,0.000032270902,0.00017087022,0.000029353865,0.0000059757026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003206527,0.000076951874,0.000033473625,0.0001990752,0.0001579917,0.000108429536,0.0000172539,0.00014072144,0.0000014520982],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027893187,0.00018857364,0.31367344,0.000043008782,0.0045115794,0.0034395785,0.47156292,0.0018166762,0.00013328843,0.04571478,0.1161348,0.042502426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009911631,0.00017697479,0.6675625,0.00007945035,0.00003136402,0.0003407904,0.08742645,0.00004051994,0.000014389907,0.0050725807,0.23792575,0.00033808016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9651114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99812126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38413647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010200979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041474793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7357451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132702733","doi":"","title":"Why are Fertility and Female Participation Rates Positively Correlated across OECD countries","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Total fertility rate; Economics; Unemployment; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Shock (circulatory); Population; Demography; Family planning; Economic growth; Medicine; Research methodology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04925285551939159,"score_gpt":0.37207668079406847,"score_spread":0.3228238252746769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132702733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790003,0.00036678038,0.000009556494,0.0005223316,0.0005436067,0.0008037631,0.00023801114,0.00004939218,0.018466296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881281,0.009834077,0.00009639982,0.0003127691,0.00006713411,0.0001342532,0.00006610816,0.000033888475,0.0013272174],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961756,0.00097636244,0.0005456239,0.00086686085,0.00036956414,0.0010660025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979576,0.00065520965,0.00024677484,0.0004811289,0.0003757028,0.00028360903],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035045396,0.00028034876,0.0004961801,0.00014565616,0.00094991305,0.0005185218,0.000403496,0.00071371614,0.000073638876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008093094,0.00031997674,0.000092100265,0.00014169641,0.001366409,0.00020554538,0.00042788615,0.0011577524,0.0000127301955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000146588,0.00015218336,0.96578383,0.00014022308,0.00008392939,0.000018770717,0.026547072,0.0015131368,0.000015885618,0.00072252116,0.000072052164,0.0048038084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044983602,0.000045174114,0.95363015,0.00010573668,0.000013584283,6.2734364e-7,0.0332869,0.0024744312,0.000025836307,0.002081591,0.0074700196,0.00041613562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021713157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017587435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017139079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011130971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085490075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132894667","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.664506","title":"Cooperative Models in Action: Simulation of a Nash-Bargaining Model of Household Labor Supply with Taxation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining problem; Operationalization; Economics; Negotiation; Microeconomics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Identification (biology); Order (exchange); Action (physics); Nash equilibrium; Computer science","score_opus":0.03432167436051933,"score_gpt":0.28859751004704454,"score_spread":0.25427583568652523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132894667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8938724,0.00024343278,0.10442242,0.0001577573,0.000021260259,0.00013370096,0.000008947784,0.000012210172,0.0011279067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972364,0.001519122,0.0007621403,0.000038314727,0.00009898851,0.0000032531614,0.0000033952745,0.000013346222,0.0003250597],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983577,0.00012643506,0.000306808,0.00012302498,0.00037633633,0.0007096956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912983,0.00005206085,0.00039403324,0.00007663248,0.00030273444,0.000044702574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011249465,0.00009540497,0.00017571484,0.0001481134,0.000172054,0.000020852418,0.0001333063,0.000089934845,0.0000043127975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005422773,0.0000862159,0.000037397906,0.00041549632,0.00008495829,0.00061667507,0.000008156331,0.000550939,3.7532607e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006123436,0.000054662036,0.006477664,0.0000022242255,0.000023600196,1.3680166e-7,0.010855219,0.82176864,0.0003049864,0.15916337,0.0000010376959,0.0012872249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089838466,0.0001914399,0.0017915508,0.000031533502,0.00002089047,0.0000027036588,0.028278057,0.90847296,0.00008327578,0.060094174,0.000012292575,0.00012276116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003819659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018045753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10366028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007257165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031252154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133088732","doi":"10.1142/s1793812010000265","title":"Gender Poverty in Tunisia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Middle East Development Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Stochastic dominance; Poverty; Economics; Demographic economics; Endowment; Dominance (genetics); Labour economics; Econometrics; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.04748135631200601,"score_gpt":0.26531532266625324,"score_spread":0.21783396635424723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133088732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9432492,0.00006552118,0.0008345441,0.00039781892,0.0021761335,0.00010253699,0.0000017451141,0.000032574117,0.053139914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832259,0.000061731596,0.012689495,0.0006287033,0.00043544176,0.0000044179433,0.0000029270975,0.00001590896,0.0029355106],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981917,0.00010300055,0.00035930582,0.00018397902,0.0005924971,0.0005695142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993009,0.000028425133,0.00010647164,0.00011585048,0.0001428441,0.00030549214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013057989,0.00014054186,0.00015373972,0.00018411964,0.000697632,0.00019359747,0.00039557792,0.00015504422,0.0006433426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012986708,0.00012980164,0.00005374207,0.00032959066,0.00009445323,0.0002555985,0.000050724557,0.00070072815,0.00013155663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018572271,0.00020972367,0.8500817,0.000010457406,0.000042996817,0.00010780785,0.12374432,0.000022331149,0.00081398466,0.010520938,0.001649262,0.012777916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072872074,0.000008938557,0.8128476,0.000024195144,0.000005664854,0.000059629747,0.026785532,0.00006551484,0.000023199138,0.004166039,0.15493286,0.00035211522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000084137726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044885264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1532836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018393037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013283553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.704415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134506188","doi":"10.7202/013466ar","title":"Choix de consommation des ménages en présence de plusieurs décideurs","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03198194386862362,"score_gpt":0.2809432531999083,"score_spread":0.24896130933128469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134506188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.955692,0.0017310019,0.010395253,0.0047050207,0.0015704152,0.00037416987,0.000087366825,0.00015614084,0.025288625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96306705,0.002733452,0.008159315,0.00149955,0.0013634012,0.000047439207,0.000034676264,0.000046752837,0.023048336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690306,0.00095509196,0.0005264471,0.00046191772,0.00012693457,0.0010265358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981499,0.0008764448,0.0002549,0.00031552563,0.0001231672,0.000280116],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014016569,0.00033568023,0.00036092696,0.00010446162,0.0005349155,0.0002631365,0.0005074879,0.0005424094,0.0001846608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003611183,0.0003963378,0.00016967944,0.00030863666,0.0011351976,0.0006779214,0.00008166104,0.0003439664,0.00014827569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020708236,0.00022983763,0.19200386,0.00016585719,0.00006747591,0.000024710178,0.072830066,0.0040967865,0.0009932144,0.7156725,0.005350774,0.008544242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085383275,0.00011852442,0.42899695,0.00021815213,0.00014852319,0.000045561734,0.037318688,0.0060062204,0.0010908187,0.4076828,0.11646293,0.0010570093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050879925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016294293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30798966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012180823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096169126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136045807","doi":"10.7202/602291ar","title":"Traitement fiscal optimal des familles quand la fécondité est endogène","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.05494303505344585,"score_gpt":0.28464004942898713,"score_spread":0.22969701437554127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136045807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9216461,0.002527254,0.0019483081,0.0036018156,0.0011553688,0.00048046117,0.00020825637,0.00013708397,0.06829534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730741,0.004753657,0.0043856525,0.0022577865,0.0010709995,0.000033578548,0.00005563193,0.00004417875,0.014324408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643415,0.00072465715,0.0007742409,0.00072476227,0.00020397922,0.0011381981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980292,0.0006588483,0.00025337492,0.00041064346,0.00010461922,0.00054332823],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010589835,0.00054702436,0.0006463739,0.00013996364,0.0006326909,0.0003553501,0.0006143831,0.0006639247,0.0005324603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016846406,0.0005822859,0.00034343844,0.00036857708,0.0012372831,0.00065650366,0.00007540509,0.00047585124,0.00020347473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064529144,0.00078470184,0.00833435,0.00008389808,0.00019188414,0.000064487176,0.08638434,0.0012085703,0.0005124749,0.8116916,0.0017260405,0.088953145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031418863,0.0012016468,0.2200396,0.0002934952,0.0003179229,0.000072901414,0.08364045,0.003928697,0.00047448147,0.09971946,0.58486056,0.0023088746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037868118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030244482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7119721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047096593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039542845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136234506","doi":"10.1186/2193-8997-1-3","title":"Personality and marital surplus","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IZA Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Graduate Center; Barnard College; University of Washington; Russell Sage Foundation; City University of New York; York University; Sage Foundation","keywords":"Personality; Extraversion and introversion; Demographic economics; Consumption (sociology); German; Economics; Psychology; Big Five personality traits; Social psychology; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.02525010745904176,"score_gpt":0.27309402501993424,"score_spread":0.24784391756089247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136234506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892438,0.0015073066,0.00005514187,0.00085106253,0.0013115398,0.00004343852,0.000032545435,0.0000065562313,0.006948575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99491984,0.0022744527,0.0009861388,0.00036346956,0.0011090575,3.4805967e-7,0.0000010020259,0.000009493224,0.00033622002],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915963,0.00008889117,0.0002865929,0.00007333449,0.000096144024,0.0002954212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991622,0.00010521113,0.00023662866,0.00007461871,0.00013553875,0.00028579554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012585295,0.000083410814,0.00019697679,0.000056523728,0.00017877494,0.000081032566,0.00016229457,0.00009259016,0.000080940954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010676668,0.00008240893,0.00006932091,0.000072970615,0.00016464469,0.00057387294,0.000028319027,0.00015509661,0.000007544869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017768294,0.000059226422,0.9348267,0.0000064685105,0.00004733891,0.0000021275214,0.016171334,0.000019931407,0.000010964308,0.046915866,0.0003773179,0.0015449587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005018149,0.000048829832,0.8939085,0.0000081863245,0.000042673557,0.00003800641,0.02030256,0.00004920476,0.00000658615,0.00349014,0.08141182,0.00019165361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025605556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049999706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081034504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013868611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024399886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33605388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136982634","doi":"10.12927/hcq.2013.22946","title":"From Rose-Coloured Glasses to Reality: Addressing the Family Policy Deficit in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare Quarterly","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Learning Partnership","funders":"","keywords":"Rose (mathematics); Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Psychology; Family medicine","score_opus":0.07743646029839733,"score_gpt":0.3572896352949012,"score_spread":0.27985317499650386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136982634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9580769,0.001090362,0.00006301246,0.03665453,0.0012013506,0.00045049193,0.00022730583,0.000052779327,0.0021833018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99091375,0.000047885536,0.00016551334,0.0074244756,0.0012848191,0.000042383945,0.000020807625,0.000021695156,0.00007868138],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687994,0.00074271805,0.00039376767,0.000281794,0.00060007814,0.0011017007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985334,0.00032576124,0.0001126263,0.0003787362,0.00012814498,0.0005212741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007438336,0.00017704246,0.00026782003,0.00009829595,0.00062226295,0.000103299,0.00040543897,0.0001404354,0.000013306374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012118194,0.00015173291,0.00004547598,0.0007625345,0.000071314,0.00015037459,0.00002032972,0.00029507457,0.000021528642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003973747,0.00008327685,0.5655096,0.000047926296,0.000022936942,0.000016441953,0.34043002,0.000026911343,0.00011910143,0.021227209,0.008362549,0.06411428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013796489,0.00005056987,0.71653825,0.00003876011,0.000005423236,5.178817e-7,0.2651459,0.00003103097,9.308014e-7,0.0013892703,0.01648436,0.00017702978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99919343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99888074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15102863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017853623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072332895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137705737","doi":"10.7202/011392ar","title":"Réactions des contribuables aux variations des taux marginaux d’impôt : une étude portant sur des données de panel au Canada","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of British Columbia; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07344523950350619,"score_gpt":0.2622078604704621,"score_spread":0.1887626209669559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137705737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9682525,0.0029170378,0.0073466417,0.00892806,0.001147112,0.0004947809,0.00097247167,0.00014482487,0.009796563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759469,0.007226167,0.006183283,0.0016661839,0.0013018325,0.00010490523,0.0000903536,0.00007111978,0.0074092583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99584615,0.0005651881,0.0009278687,0.0006498259,0.00022303218,0.0017879199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646455,0.0012420987,0.0003932979,0.0004971514,0.0005887612,0.0008141377],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011432482,0.0005670593,0.00067030604,0.00013658036,0.0028809789,0.000317406,0.00065505435,0.0005034817,0.0005533806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092272647,0.0006335005,0.00024160139,0.00080938224,0.0018738164,0.0011865397,0.00010936651,0.00044295657,0.00004742608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035850302,0.0005817695,0.25771874,0.00022520771,0.00051668077,0.000041157262,0.07643925,0.008797211,0.00024079428,0.63832194,0.0015433411,0.015538083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010669068,0.000106170315,0.699304,0.00023009845,0.000361504,0.000055875284,0.04278329,0.005146647,0.00017294052,0.08735867,0.16224737,0.0011665387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9761758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99867815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5509632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064620916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01381452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138043912","doi":"10.21083/surg.v6i1.1826","title":"Educational assortative mating in the United States and the effect on income inequality by household from 1960 to 2005","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SURG Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Assortative mating; Microdata (statistics); Economics; Economic inequality; Inequality; Educational attainment; Demographic economics; Census; Welfare state; Gini coefficient; Population; Economic growth; Demography; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.02116509897805323,"score_gpt":0.2984428643778489,"score_spread":0.27727776539979565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138043912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908743,0.00008767786,0.000058306916,0.007694817,0.00020774856,0.00024886974,0.000048764796,0.0000065090658,0.0007729908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977815,0.00013367872,0.00009209422,0.0016222944,0.0002253474,0.000020272899,0.000021297807,0.0000061156443,0.00009738035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734205,0.0017052753,0.0002204256,0.00010055929,0.00039172932,0.00023994021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643,0.0031934448,0.00012622151,0.00008734708,0.000065398555,0.00009761337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003392146,0.00008782859,0.00013094774,0.00007153195,0.00053180987,0.00029809657,0.00023298374,0.000042857708,0.00007300321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004806301,0.00004740701,0.00003215191,0.00029502792,0.00013879732,0.00013005556,0.000019387939,0.00034809136,0.000011131958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003850612,0.000046434205,0.9018963,0.0000028699114,0.00003359057,0.0000013923475,0.08695514,0.00037421103,0.000033770822,0.0020587877,0.0072601773,0.001298856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070000114,0.000054113785,0.9412848,0.000033995144,0.000008659597,0.0000010734548,0.03950678,0.00035101167,0.0000038257867,0.016246062,0.0017026055,0.00010707598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025028912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028577726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047448356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008555321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000895237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9814635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138506321","doi":"10.1162/1542476041423377","title":"The Married Widow: Marriage Penalties Matter!","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the European Economic Association","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Economics; Government (linguistics); Pension; Empirical evidence; Identification (biology); Labour economics; Demographic economics; Public economics; Political science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.009731034158325437,"score_gpt":0.22689563056019,"score_spread":0.21716459640186456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138506321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8430751,0.000120204335,0.00010447913,0.013971621,0.0040420033,0.00011949019,0.000009021367,0.000012687759,0.13854536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98735976,0.00038109973,0.000068594025,0.0005742926,0.0013327483,4.160957e-7,5.197022e-7,0.00001713177,0.010265459],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981935,0.0008069699,0.00043713994,0.00007909482,0.00024052343,0.00024279603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983231,0.00018799334,0.0011694736,0.00015330309,0.000100815276,0.00006533598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045761764,0.0000842853,0.00013217144,0.000031930762,0.0009158169,0.00025844315,0.00063986966,0.000043363423,0.000039859184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033882583,0.000054809825,0.00018295852,0.00006195128,0.00008411032,0.00025947066,0.00006285151,0.00023426942,0.0002760057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000635166,0.00009723839,0.8163043,0.0000099625495,0.00053692784,0.000012394878,0.04990117,0.008888187,0.00022958883,0.025609124,0.09450409,0.003843471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007843459,0.00002662917,0.890728,0.000024332312,0.000059732443,0.000005587857,0.010704469,0.000020077197,0.000013075536,0.012705676,0.0847829,0.00014519523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013677134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006269172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14428462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001563262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002700061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7043816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139023613","doi":"10.3138/cpp.34.1.037","title":"Welfare Policy, Language Group, and the Duration of Lone Motherhood Spells","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Statistics Canada; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Welfare; Welfare state; Duration (music); Welfare reform; Demography; Preference; Sample (material); Economics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013942233588582141,"score_gpt":0.2508567189635893,"score_spread":0.23691448537500714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139023613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63954175,0.00043042048,0.00003599755,0.09946439,0.00012094098,0.00034220447,0.00015898318,0.00003005114,0.2598753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99275035,0.0003328789,0.000040309398,0.0025017995,0.00061457104,0.000003119485,0.0000143290445,0.000013080795,0.0037295679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884325,0.00015489371,0.00017417083,0.00014301365,0.00020279305,0.00048187477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991018,0.000042752636,0.00008118311,0.00022623182,0.00007144264,0.0004765458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037211803,0.00009758647,0.00015066673,0.0003685271,0.0005371721,0.000069942005,0.00027724175,0.00010997602,0.00009063096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000467676,0.00008100486,0.00004849018,0.00080529414,0.00076835515,0.0001794894,0.000020745481,0.00009473931,0.000021768097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024354454,0.00000998307,0.0087413695,0.0000054086704,0.000016713724,0.000005479924,0.035040833,5.984217e-7,0.000015086426,0.9526546,0.0016651792,0.0018423045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032127395,0.00007159418,0.5635369,0.00001618376,0.000032629687,0.000058540623,0.07745726,0.00031944597,0.000014972732,0.018753713,0.33585232,0.00067371357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9074534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84227234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9339009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029357444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028632914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50793564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139035564","doi":"","title":"Taxpayers' Response to Tax Rate Changes: A Canadian Panel Study","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Economics; Income tax; Gross income; Tax rate; Adjusted gross income; Tax revenue; State income tax; Tax evasion; Welfare economics; Labour economics; Econometrics; Tax reform; Demographic economics; Public economics; Monetary economics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.028410113222269457,"score_gpt":0.2602762384659635,"score_spread":0.23186612524369402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139035564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755335,0.0006140524,0.00003418347,0.002750898,0.0012056195,0.0021360049,0.004465367,0.0001054631,0.0131549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96596706,0.003571524,0.00021026084,0.00024167563,0.00026071435,0.000007164198,0.00048448567,0.00003803135,0.029219082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950139,0.0013857574,0.0004691797,0.0015799049,0.0007204416,0.0008308233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99559253,0.00031226903,0.00051681657,0.0021697332,0.0003116911,0.0010969549],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001640167,0.0005210091,0.00082294416,0.0005645098,0.0017695584,0.00026291423,0.0022204085,0.0004946592,0.00012784728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022840743,0.00063048606,0.00011219928,0.00035110753,0.0005297864,0.00038571152,0.0014802408,0.00051669084,0.000028873153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010838399,0.003652805,0.3061113,0.00076157064,0.0065089804,0.018778492,0.18122143,0.0015354078,0.00085752446,0.0009144533,0.43853897,0.030280665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025914405,0.0005002602,0.20391847,0.00032544398,0.0010680773,0.000018719491,0.086236484,0.00014989763,0.000006453198,0.00022442796,0.7035022,0.0014581351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9044119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96639466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2649632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001247705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002041824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139121804","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00413.x","title":"Tax incentives and fertility in Canada: quantum vs tempo effects","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Allowance (engineering); Fertility; Incentive; Demographic economics; Demography; Rest (music); Economics; Medicine; Sociology; Operations management; Population","score_opus":0.058565756521485324,"score_gpt":0.1994010680988114,"score_spread":0.14083531157732607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139121804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99460727,0.00047445978,0.000041567677,0.0012279636,0.0019045222,0.0002717695,0.0000801302,0.0000034377913,0.0013888589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998565,0.00022687853,0.0001202678,0.00063252996,0.0002740649,0.0000033350007,0.000003933349,0.000024564719,0.00014941795],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765563,0.00014832288,0.0007720302,0.00031103042,0.0000072136563,0.0011057599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964332,0.0003998454,0.00039814494,0.00021231138,0.00015923801,0.0023972502],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002001733,0.00022651852,0.0005514775,0.0005068972,0.00031417754,0.00009755736,0.00044962618,0.00018207019,0.0000385654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047576195,0.00028369497,0.00008625647,0.00020061384,0.0003065971,0.00038685117,0.000018564368,0.00040525166,0.0000018634335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066687346,0.000009778887,0.8278289,0.000042457024,0.000051852374,0.00038909772,0.008458897,0.00027586918,0.000006157049,0.16051857,0.00020073487,0.0021510185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008327171,0.00013641105,0.91343576,0.00010736841,0.000024641502,0.000046023833,0.018307058,0.0005590233,0.000020237148,0.052469466,0.01357237,0.0004889254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99863136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10804911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009134996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017786056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139226207","doi":"10.1007/s10834-009-9158-7","title":"Family Responsibilities, Productivity, and Earnings: A Study of Gender Differences Among Canadian Lawyers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Productivity; Family-friendly; Earnings; Affect (linguistics); Human capital; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Relevance (law); Business; Accounting; Economics; Economic growth; Political science; Psychology; Law; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03958247724315573,"score_gpt":0.2868391064029316,"score_spread":0.24725662915977586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139226207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942533,0.0015189111,0.00000212818,0.00028880185,0.0003667269,0.00018983221,0.000008017839,0.0000075596686,0.0033647218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774706,0.0013128018,0.000091693204,0.00008634597,0.00022244299,6.687705e-7,3.6872157e-7,0.000006551109,0.00053203903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986521,0.00023764196,0.000438671,0.00021158121,0.00017065444,0.00028935715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991112,0.00010227912,0.00030382446,0.0001244112,0.00010469558,0.0002536202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013835864,0.00013867464,0.00041214324,0.00025790217,0.0003200224,0.00010533217,0.00018816142,0.00009747159,0.000010407381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110728695,0.00012586951,0.00004761927,0.000070717484,0.00029839238,0.00043379562,0.000021375914,0.00019463927,8.562223e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005399623,0.000076935634,0.897318,0.000008431312,0.000059019727,0.000009154958,0.10069798,0.000034445195,0.000082809296,0.0005414991,0.0002772722,0.0008404569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003230522,0.00042845545,0.79768664,0.000016955744,0.000030593557,0.0000033869253,0.19927834,0.000022925995,0.0000021537671,0.0011080031,0.0009885249,0.0001109935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1305948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18790486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09963138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012073515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045164485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87519467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139262544","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2006.08.011","title":"Trying to Find the Quickest Way: Employed Mothers’ Constructions of Time for Food","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":242,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Scarcity; Provisioning; Snowball sampling; Grounded theory; Wage; Feeling; Time allocation; Metropolitan area; Psychology; Order (exchange); Ethnic group; Social psychology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Business; Economics; Medicine; Computer science; Labour economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02901207267136346,"score_gpt":0.3339907688801135,"score_spread":0.30497869620875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139262544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99523765,0.00013430466,0.0014794782,0.0017921036,0.00078693347,0.00034783533,0.00003052036,0.0000042346833,0.00018692327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935563,0.000092244954,0.005345229,0.00018702551,0.0004630766,0.000021504335,0.000003660347,0.000005693735,0.0003252585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993577,0.00003723928,0.00027699355,0.000057205507,0.00016103529,0.00010979826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990862,0.00011181865,0.00020364627,0.000052858002,0.00044275957,0.000102687736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054709835,0.000048422044,0.00009982554,0.00012956819,0.00027486656,0.00003438224,0.00008426203,0.00005602839,0.000030382342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080664075,0.000039464172,0.000064147855,0.00018777879,0.000101825535,0.00011080727,0.0000040722025,0.00006927225,0.0000010095567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003120982,0.026490662,0.3190797,0.0002668572,0.00019855838,0.0000026359655,0.24963522,0.000020066836,0.08960774,0.031649385,0.032367542,0.25036955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001185352,0.0006199576,0.6790722,0.00011883399,0.0002420541,0.000054709988,0.2815543,0.0000043091645,0.00055134634,0.0022001185,0.034231793,0.00016499638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034448894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012847336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35999253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005684234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020658305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21140791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139476074","doi":"10.1111/0008-4085.00081","title":"In and out of the labour market: long‐term income consequences of child‐related interruptions to women's paid work","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Microdata (statistics); Humanities; Welfare economics; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Labour economics; Demography; Art; Census; Population; Economic growth","score_opus":0.05644429305961114,"score_gpt":0.20945602676461222,"score_spread":0.1530117337050011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139476074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97202206,0.0013357555,0.000008242028,0.019406738,0.0044951527,0.0003594421,0.0003426859,0.0000019219049,0.0020280192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923235,0.0017154751,0.00006641416,0.0010924996,0.0002724739,0.000009115919,0.0000016070964,0.00003149764,0.0044873976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970314,0.00033519437,0.0013705825,0.00031376383,0.000009444734,0.00093962403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964798,0.0002297656,0.0009917939,0.00034892117,0.00023509286,0.0017146158],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015493935,0.00029354377,0.0008117857,0.0007046789,0.00022744994,0.000076073455,0.0008555625,0.0003369575,0.0006801138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032861414,0.00031976658,0.00020386346,0.000626079,0.0014823618,0.00043268406,0.000052629697,0.00053968286,0.000005705918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068942725,0.000033719727,0.790095,0.00008530447,0.0002184868,0.00011505791,0.052994795,0.002076545,0.000008529229,0.15228377,0.00014659425,0.0018732812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011589688,0.00046058258,0.8584235,0.0014661314,0.00007397303,0.00035741244,0.023758356,0.00012368069,0.00001052047,0.097964995,0.0155543275,0.0006475681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18400505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9886203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8046152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00292112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032829451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139559906","doi":"10.1177/0020715207083339","title":"Employment Insecurity at Labour Market Entry and Its Impact on Parental Home Leaving and Family Formation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Nuclear family; Economics; Scale (ratio); Economic growth; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.037297939671866565,"score_gpt":0.37360606476457575,"score_spread":0.3363081250927092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139559906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99429965,0.0009491529,0.00036350312,0.00042740343,0.00077567203,0.00008699643,0.00003653022,0.00000729932,0.0030537995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981776,0.0009308382,0.000064629654,0.00034129506,0.0003236578,8.9346526e-7,0.0000069516627,0.0000039997135,0.00015012253],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987262,0.0002559178,0.00034383035,0.000104428356,0.00036527665,0.00020437677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987116,0.00039484023,0.00034312462,0.00003079464,0.00039430909,0.00012536687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096325163,0.000112519796,0.0002218629,0.00014401381,0.000209383,0.00003982345,0.00017145605,0.000101296,0.00006084998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052548643,0.00009358559,0.00006965277,0.000044894423,0.0002543345,0.00029258436,0.000060584487,0.00022449649,0.0000045637876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010768225,0.00021532273,0.80630237,0.000007400184,0.00040220216,0.00005679623,0.13305545,0.0000836369,0.002052994,0.053580213,0.0021737725,0.0009930333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077339815,0.00025090907,0.97503996,0.000023116609,0.0000103144,0.00003979997,0.016745972,0.00018203659,0.0000533784,0.0053208573,0.0014602366,0.00009999534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006465692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019488823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16873764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046479254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008419074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.381631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140885219","doi":"","title":"Labor Supply, Wealth Dynamics, and Marriage Decisions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"California Center for Population Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Economics; Subsidy; Earned income tax credit; Welfare; Labour economics; Production (economics); Panel data; Labour supply; Microeconomics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.04840685869688801,"score_gpt":0.37803602923448665,"score_spread":0.32962917053759866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140885219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828871,0.00015049354,0.0049189264,0.003188526,0.00038581996,0.0010285834,0.0035081322,0.00007369682,0.0038587067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99233115,0.00023937275,0.0019263139,0.00010942185,0.00035124895,0.000056235946,0.0016564591,0.00002556201,0.0033042477],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767786,0.00030411745,0.00031022195,0.00033679037,0.0006687531,0.00070223917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866724,0.0004063112,0.000057850164,0.00021229443,0.00043209083,0.00022423432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018929709,0.00011074145,0.0001567088,0.0002471688,0.0012871363,0.00019961105,0.00022399961,0.0001542317,0.000081705686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047176002,0.0001084027,0.000061574814,0.0004508918,0.00022319872,0.00013141501,0.000080976926,0.0002026868,0.000043942513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024532375,0.00007107334,0.88563734,0.00001635838,0.000005084021,0.0000013697177,0.0003546964,0.00002077215,0.000014954862,0.10488734,0.0068177,0.0021487607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008235952,0.00004630276,0.8630314,0.00003130955,0.000007127175,0.0000010452032,0.0030137922,0.011841623,0.0000027413,0.038213387,0.08280213,0.00018553919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008029371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036114827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07598443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032477244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014170297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141214233","doi":"10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00072.x","title":"Race, Bureaucratic Discretion, and the Implementation of Welfare Reform","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Welfare reform; Discretion; Sanctions; Context (archaeology); Welfare; Demographic economics; Political science; Bureaucracy; Population; Politics; Sociology; Economics; Demography; Geography; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.008628040850171454,"score_gpt":0.32848884598884365,"score_spread":0.3198608051386722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141214233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96958786,0.000027688144,0.003242113,0.024274673,0.000112285095,0.00007697184,0.0000038447856,0.000003591408,0.0026709908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838257,0.000058890568,0.0011306257,0.00034321353,0.000068522284,8.522802e-7,1.5873101e-7,0.0000023834011,0.000012781859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998472,0.00009464045,0.00030058253,0.000088847664,0.0006484364,0.00039552728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900216,0.00005789118,0.00025627832,0.0000860369,0.00031239676,0.00028524516],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018144387,0.0000560778,0.0001708719,0.00007422923,0.00045317254,0.000057087076,0.00032060314,0.00001312203,0.000019109053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023434144,0.00003288367,0.000047799746,0.00064146094,0.007238232,0.0002942122,0.000027144786,0.000098277764,6.202441e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009335063,0.000013337706,0.0040860316,0.0000017570418,0.0000046770965,9.711293e-7,0.0074467254,0.0000068921463,0.000065073924,0.9854681,0.0000011189427,0.0028959892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009234657,0.00035827665,0.4772726,0.000019880967,0.00003951644,0.000025956911,0.44477963,0.00002665564,0.00011104853,0.07617678,0.00016848792,0.00009770035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022138927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008982555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9092913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029260988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060678646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141680180","doi":"10.7202/013470ar","title":"Effets d’une réforme fiscale sur l’offre de travail des ménages dans un cadre collectif simulé","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020802663314890342,"score_gpt":0.238141342929457,"score_spread":0.21733867961456665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141680180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9391066,0.002693893,0.0024014125,0.002371823,0.0012071121,0.00061515934,0.00038176804,0.00019508015,0.05102719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8707913,0.0014770027,0.0011816727,0.0008262957,0.0010094519,0.00005774583,0.000066411194,0.000084399275,0.12450569],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595106,0.00076555193,0.00078877684,0.0007594803,0.00020347346,0.0015316714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975389,0.001025432,0.00029800396,0.0005027641,0.00018887126,0.0004459991],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001071761,0.000601456,0.00071395346,0.00012536174,0.001242915,0.00030100727,0.0007191267,0.00089280144,0.0004865083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020729905,0.0006651415,0.00036577138,0.0008945498,0.0015429672,0.00065959047,0.00010654601,0.00051412015,0.0001648125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001558187,0.0021493707,0.52584,0.00075378374,0.00055232475,0.00020186199,0.25750306,0.011409969,0.0027101757,0.13600075,0.017526409,0.045196515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022269986,0.00030985882,0.76836103,0.00018021054,0.00025948684,0.00004617796,0.03646571,0.0048092236,0.0018094864,0.10412201,0.07982939,0.0015804473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15515693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18735176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24252103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011384565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007757591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142428142","doi":"10.7202/013467ar","title":"Discrimination sexuelle dans les dépenses des ménages : survol de la littérature et évidences empiriques pour le Canada","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03663752867563275,"score_gpt":0.28271223530522127,"score_spread":0.24607470662958852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142428142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9165546,0.007562587,0.0031842915,0.011678931,0.00057701,0.0002579354,0.00023900799,0.00009572684,0.05984995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9357406,0.004001039,0.003077141,0.0009404746,0.0005519865,0.000032874326,0.00007927716,0.00004429911,0.055532306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996097,0.0020219812,0.00048013666,0.00050712406,0.00018171643,0.0007120013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997709,0.0013714401,0.00025438538,0.00026849782,0.00019724287,0.00019943409],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001388682,0.0003910015,0.0003901667,0.00007320591,0.00083855964,0.0004424404,0.0004876895,0.0005288559,0.00006423506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003524607,0.00040724254,0.00013675327,0.00033081425,0.0013000387,0.00071259483,0.00008174228,0.0004121922,0.000006475166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000185594,0.00030351037,0.23856077,0.00023634254,0.00008955028,0.00004573083,0.06357938,0.0021917166,0.0010359258,0.67365,0.011885929,0.008402537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003648805,0.00006557388,0.54289716,0.00021069513,0.000081571256,0.000022682929,0.16100217,0.0011691919,0.0012556372,0.16025136,0.13184567,0.0008333996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9798969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5133987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009682192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005215611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142734701","doi":"10.7202/010170ar","title":"Les enfants des mères seules : précarité économique et politiques sociales","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04707937712515666,"score_gpt":0.3009801918209964,"score_spread":0.25390081469583975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142734701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90790486,0.04557796,0.0013618437,0.0053911693,0.0013416536,0.000484048,0.0003474542,0.0003544231,0.037236575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92477316,0.06494631,0.004455249,0.0024322765,0.0009026354,0.00006491287,0.000048849164,0.00010895337,0.0022676843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995435,0.0009571323,0.00067734596,0.0008057468,0.0003609893,0.0017637805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976308,0.00044959856,0.00032230778,0.0004663009,0.0003663201,0.0007647121],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013124541,0.0006733802,0.00069624576,0.00054551015,0.0018995954,0.0003460164,0.0008199152,0.0013837528,0.000082044964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003996526,0.0007818953,0.00071099063,0.0015285567,0.011602963,0.0007306672,0.00008914596,0.0009607227,0.000034839704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017501901,0.00024390903,0.15460216,0.00014831603,0.00026271655,0.00005154902,0.093643054,0.00012956573,0.000095115196,0.7414225,0.0005258548,0.008857782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087722024,0.00020145503,0.2299995,0.0003550458,0.00025882412,0.000027395157,0.11067208,0.000020916274,0.00014529363,0.61501086,0.041300748,0.0011306423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.549001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6820815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13308053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001751088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029564023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143369209","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.12.014","title":"A quantitative theory of the gender gap in wages","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; University of Toronto; University of Southampton; Arizona State University; University of Pennsylvania; Universidad de Alicante; University of Southern California","keywords":"Human capital; Wage; Economics; Fertility; Gender gap; Labour economics; Human capital theory; Work (physics); Work hours; Rest (music); Working hours; Demographic economics; Population; Sociology; Demography; Medicine","score_opus":0.08802190479213197,"score_gpt":0.3183815101258161,"score_spread":0.23035960533368416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143369209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2369315,0.05456135,0.00024105773,0.002108876,0.00068543945,0.0006516585,0.000030462375,0.000028845338,0.7047608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8313696,0.164179,0.000118669515,0.0010331778,0.00006905319,0.0000047166213,5.2204734e-7,0.000018606414,0.00320666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772185,0.0015605941,0.0003216994,0.00016543918,0.00006223158,0.00016816238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992815,0.00021207043,0.00017797595,0.00027011393,0.000021583804,0.000036728357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028009943,0.00007999253,0.00020265726,0.000024055085,0.000070036105,0.000009764598,0.00041545246,0.000015791778,0.00027491443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027840718,0.000044729863,0.000103310034,0.00008094353,0.00025058564,0.00009692863,0.00006682686,0.000052065057,0.00043636092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006086522,0.000030779713,0.031598017,0.00025920177,0.00003468367,0.0000029370399,0.00911153,0.0000045826855,0.00006497861,0.91704005,0.0033814616,0.03846568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006950091,0.000053972748,0.5264993,0.0034359694,0.00007453652,0.0000021432327,0.007895038,0.000008545561,0.000010550222,0.03422714,0.4266109,0.00048696712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003807906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018104208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8828129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007835538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010180188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56086826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143551151","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2010.01599.x","title":"The impact of the Self‐Sufficiency Project on the employment behaviour of former welfare recipients","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Subsidy; Random assignment; Welfare; Self-employment; Economics; Randomized experiment; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Percentage point; Order (exchange); Entrepreneurship; Finance; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.08058159229291512,"score_gpt":0.2368186879882703,"score_spread":0.15623709569535518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143551151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888244,0.00003791991,0.0000012387189,0.0037208295,0.0022472881,0.0005223225,0.0002309678,0.0000030691872,0.0044119647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990907,0.0001007646,0.000035367306,0.00012758968,0.0002601301,0.000011916595,0.0000018056269,0.00002570715,0.00034603992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981306,0.00015777786,0.0007685981,0.00019966543,0.000015384112,0.0007279496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971609,0.000262003,0.0009946601,0.000582246,0.00037469078,0.0006254986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019030974,0.00021243014,0.00035587224,0.00022699086,0.0010365334,0.00010981458,0.0015242428,0.00017970966,0.00009408946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044031866,0.00012984323,0.00045198263,0.0002495326,0.0006182649,0.00017696539,0.000029979123,0.0005780597,0.0000019877612],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031148862,0.000052447536,0.26129305,0.00000590627,0.00016975409,0.0000052509904,0.018515805,0.0005665319,0.000024854768,0.7174452,0.0008833915,0.0010066285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012043673,0.0015515711,0.8537282,0.00015864035,0.00020240738,0.000111626905,0.04199236,0.0007766942,0.00012934687,0.054842558,0.044476617,0.00082562165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4672131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9894329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66260266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015127853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007041076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143811048","doi":"10.1111/roiw.12119","title":"Gender Patterns and Value of Unpaid Care Work: Findings From<scp>C</scp>hina's First Large‐Scale Time Use Survey","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Income and Wealth","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Unpaid work; Economics; Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Labour economics; Time-use survey; Paid work; Work hours; Demographic economics; Care work; Consumption (sociology); Working hours; Statistics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020672859091316078,"score_gpt":0.28232119963110536,"score_spread":0.2616483405397893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143811048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9644336,0.03392672,0.0001661882,0.00007675291,0.00011008424,0.00030575966,0.00035912203,0.00001722703,0.0006045169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8262955,0.17274573,0.00029213764,0.00037783064,0.000052514497,0.0000041074695,0.000083355604,0.000013929778,0.00013488287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998048,0.0005716888,0.00043766497,0.0002820365,0.0003222753,0.00033832865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982575,0.0008521463,0.00025003645,0.00026439643,0.00018275813,0.00019312951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019253539,0.00016369978,0.0006081799,0.000055160064,0.00024574745,0.000033577486,0.00020678877,0.00012291425,0.00002361748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052452524,0.00014108898,0.00008099518,0.0002892232,0.00013689221,0.00014109464,0.00010406882,0.00012940036,0.000007893603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014517038,0.00002789833,0.98450965,0.002637322,0.000018724697,3.6036133e-7,0.011193145,6.558036e-7,0.0000017816583,0.00054097804,0.00044119352,0.0006268424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023553846,0.00004759343,0.9853379,0.0020799763,0.00004784787,2.904782e-7,0.0023705745,0.000042378702,0.000002179907,0.00013693506,0.009617592,0.000081203296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006841793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003976954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13881901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039304952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011048646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145535529","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00466.x","title":"THE EFFECTS OF SINGLE MOTHERS' WELFARE USE AND EMPLOYMENT DECISIONS ON CHILDREN'S COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Welfare; Economics; Single mothers; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Cognition; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Test (biology); Labour economics; Developmental psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0373026475440949,"score_gpt":0.2811244426921133,"score_spread":0.24382179514801838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145535529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99676424,0.00025932727,0.00010025545,0.000120181154,0.0016069564,0.0002995525,0.000010166986,0.000016682801,0.00082260673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99901396,0.00016851857,0.00012833133,0.0001512413,0.0002684931,0.000014031827,0.0000055993655,0.000011141881,0.00023868716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992175,0.00009838342,0.00016730507,0.00014219877,0.00008981456,0.00028479178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887085,0.000800474,0.000085124535,0.000114537754,0.0000248398,0.00010416575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003388025,0.00009548992,0.0001153548,0.000038692488,0.00060503086,0.000057719877,0.0001129783,0.00006511742,0.0000140332095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002277513,0.00007614767,0.000032208944,0.00003444932,0.0003000455,0.00016197647,0.000051109775,0.0000585371,0.000027610127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005879672,0.00041416098,0.6257527,0.000009360128,0.00028816998,0.0000010152909,0.27196366,0.000030503707,0.00005700635,0.0421995,0.0018156128,0.05740954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038141894,0.00006809047,0.97370845,0.000040313724,0.000018783732,4.882409e-7,0.017531257,0.0000038830635,0.0002900957,0.00015674219,0.0076535167,0.00014697506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019996021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034721883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34795576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015053891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006994279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46534693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146921874","doi":"","title":"Why Have Real Wages Lagged Labour Productivity Growth in Canada?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Real wages; Economics; Labour economics; Efficiency wage; Macroeconomics; Wage","score_opus":0.028005783221162706,"score_gpt":0.2629567123037114,"score_spread":0.23495092908254872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146921874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87843424,0.00003061323,0.000038161328,0.0057511553,0.0004635605,0.0001590005,0.0000122058955,0.000043492382,0.11506759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992793,0.00007038901,0.0002440224,0.0008380723,0.00019118426,0.0000066689054,0.0000035552869,0.000007901237,0.0058451844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858314,0.00020784255,0.00013201947,0.00023855499,0.00045409947,0.00038436108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993695,0.000044115637,0.0000383206,0.00014094407,0.00020209882,0.00020503596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007533591,0.00009256656,0.00014238223,0.000044843284,0.0001282046,0.00003903356,0.00020985556,0.00006194248,0.00003228749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032762467,0.000084899555,0.000017111059,0.00030149627,0.00008207353,0.00018176662,0.000038012062,0.00012375346,0.000005767673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070770716,0.000043358978,0.9269048,0.0000063980146,0.0000059432095,0.000015052194,0.012755934,0.000022594751,0.000020677096,0.03746155,0.022511208,0.00024540152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004373835,0.00002440605,0.85166603,0.000005679908,0.000005911663,6.761098e-7,0.109023616,0.00012072007,0.00006747322,0.008344627,0.030009307,0.00029414232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99837464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1143588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000706116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030852028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5473017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147297979","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1001361","title":"Work, Rest, and Play: Exploring Trends in Time Allocation in Canada and the United States","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Rest (music); Work (physics); Political science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.02067902269025388,"score_gpt":0.2333590481286182,"score_spread":0.21268002543836434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147297979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968292,0.0011392576,0.000027232465,0.0016545219,0.000048273534,0.000045370998,6.7096715e-7,0.0000047523117,0.0002507158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96966916,0.029427094,0.000008410267,0.0000946566,0.000048658363,0.0000040277464,0.000004391828,0.0000057737384,0.0007378214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984873,0.00021390468,0.00015938752,0.000096298434,0.00021460095,0.0008285436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970657,0.000108282264,0.000053595897,0.000049384926,0.000026447568,0.00005572862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013593772,0.00006914733,0.00010430299,0.00016127093,0.0002797415,0.000033520442,0.000121199104,0.00003001685,0.0000031855009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039560997,0.000054253185,0.000010936155,0.0006359711,0.00012132975,0.00013548505,0.00001570382,0.0006332726,3.6189647e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015025979,0.00002989362,0.896273,0.00000196257,0.000043109285,0.00002441214,0.059098743,0.0019281863,0.000007362536,0.030056816,0.00014699699,0.012239216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024531526,0.000054730346,0.8732186,0.000030889845,0.00001323398,0.00006685429,0.08789648,0.0025205906,0.0000010060544,0.03184914,0.0016591474,0.00023615157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8560715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13344029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011291135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00265745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47142023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148418564","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.890283","title":"Modes of Spousal Interaction and the Labor Market Environment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Economics; Context (archaeology); Outcome (game theory); Welfare; Aggregate (composite); Sample (material); Mode (computer interface); Microeconomics; Labour economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.00787187772103635,"score_gpt":0.2481741515352763,"score_spread":0.24030227381423996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148418564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96189785,0.0091022095,0.007351135,0.002153075,0.0006937233,0.00040065474,0.000028422523,0.000021829977,0.018351113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93645495,0.05921117,0.00014299472,0.00004608942,0.00047840888,0.00000802015,0.0000059483896,0.000016463282,0.0036359641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997438,0.00050337706,0.00034621186,0.0002135965,0.00043951313,0.0010593073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915266,0.00013122517,0.00041533273,0.00018034868,0.00006557797,0.0000548696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035285691,0.00017582002,0.00027930722,0.00008107491,0.0003658688,0.00009883492,0.00036480895,0.0002082878,0.000037723392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005257269,0.00013062522,0.00014121662,0.00006363748,0.00042461767,0.00008991552,0.00014771493,0.0022946429,0.0000021224992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006638043,0.00028341732,0.039698787,0.00007194617,0.00085234386,0.00000511308,0.01544654,0.0053926543,0.00010190721,0.9090284,0.0008578849,0.027597208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015600545,0.000108946,0.020827949,0.00007582066,0.00026604853,0.000047461584,0.05626112,0.0032208294,0.0000067054507,0.9103686,0.0068601808,0.0003962602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003627758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006291707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050108958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009327294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018029313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148455532","doi":"10.1007/s001480100073","title":"\"Living in sin\" and marriage: A matching model","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Matching (statistics); Social policy; Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03256569957431372,"score_gpt":0.26732040267660284,"score_spread":0.23475470310228913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148455532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955285,0.0001080639,0.0015953805,0.0003486707,0.0002353221,0.00004072599,0.0000014971693,0.0000044391186,0.002137367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996136,0.0006852714,0.0026725896,0.00012527964,0.00014446498,2.661155e-7,3.9826355e-7,0.0000064369106,0.00022930524],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993579,0.00005033681,0.00034083112,0.0000657154,0.000062475425,0.00012274386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954927,0.000059417656,0.00024858606,0.00004483661,0.000031335538,0.00006655542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006447589,0.00005144629,0.00013046346,0.00012361011,0.00011390944,0.00007436019,0.000076724544,0.00006227149,0.000025735228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065978165,0.000056452584,0.000034973917,0.00005611842,0.000021771546,0.00050128094,0.00001423912,0.0001127091,0.0000016150299],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043614027,0.000042173786,0.7353223,0.0000072957646,0.000010785889,0.00000254052,0.032607026,0.20114805,0.000011096535,0.025738645,0.000055425866,0.0050503258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003175385,0.00001591042,0.5004645,0.00003335858,0.0000114790755,0.000008331782,0.007943007,0.43889093,1.6690868e-7,0.051971078,0.00020677247,0.00013694607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003460216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022068997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23774289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001641579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024092446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23020695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149197207","doi":"10.25336/p6m90p","title":"Examining the determinants of union dissolution among married and common-law unions in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Employment and Social Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Odds; Demographic economics; Economics; Political science; Labour economics; Law; Economic growth; Logistic regression; Statistics","score_opus":0.06489061136422779,"score_gpt":0.3118070783811115,"score_spread":0.2469164670168837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149197207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975348,0.00052426936,0.0000012917019,0.000089546724,0.00047633713,0.00015785733,0.000015173321,0.000002829053,0.00119791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997083,0.00013605937,0.000013920144,0.00006211645,0.000035982186,0.000008435811,0.000009385944,0.0000043864197,0.00002140169],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910307,0.0002010462,0.00019557797,0.00008134831,0.00011893553,0.0003000489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996058,0.00010194328,0.00006861081,0.00008734107,0.000031803804,0.000104529674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061043026,0.00006248252,0.00012936229,0.00007598949,0.00034955778,0.0000068826885,0.00007057058,0.00004462883,0.0000014174138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008887156,0.000057206747,0.0000066876346,0.00027886356,0.00020255127,0.00015423352,0.000021138589,0.00007245698,8.287896e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.915116e-7,0.000002173446,0.9790527,0.0000065277072,0.0000036794077,0.0000010208862,0.012531983,0.00005625479,4.0796863e-7,0.007228761,0.000016854772,0.0010990473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007018313,0.000003132983,0.9309823,0.000034188364,0.000005809428,2.1360381e-7,0.06789002,0.00035773125,2.9153244e-7,0.00045620598,0.00014011611,0.000059801103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99925786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055358037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012383782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002659486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3238316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149306621","doi":"10.1111/1467-9361.00176","title":"Publicly Provided Goods and Intrafamily Resource Allocation: Female Child Survival in India","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Development Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Child survival; Census; Morality; Production (economics); Literacy; Demographic economics; Economics; Child mortality; Logistic regression; Demography; Economic growth; Political science; Developing country; Sociology; Medicine; Population; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02071904744612236,"score_gpt":0.25783979350200376,"score_spread":0.2371207460558814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149306621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.789834,0.027054083,0.00007253502,0.0012984796,0.00034541328,0.0011399356,0.0000073222723,0.000036388366,0.1802118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7276622,0.2599197,0.009294606,0.0023500924,0.00007914891,0.00007757782,0.00005436322,0.000032707696,0.0005296047],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984926,0.00020630113,0.00061949174,0.0002819879,0.00011799416,0.00028163046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993439,0.00007552257,0.00022943433,0.0001825057,0.000053941014,0.00011471236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022921541,0.00013892812,0.00037419287,0.000091340255,0.00015446372,0.000046762034,0.00021816808,0.000092053044,0.000029979512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027412412,0.00014956757,0.000038124996,0.00029291227,0.000092233575,0.00019152906,0.000041733267,0.00011522874,0.000008204896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060515995,0.00017338594,0.5566822,0.0025494022,0.00007637308,0.0000017967506,0.012758899,0.0000120111135,0.0000022890201,0.40107465,0.0003995809,0.026263326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040825625,0.0000152569955,0.34325814,0.00095004746,0.000013765726,0.000002096393,0.0050587915,0.000008433084,0.00001841457,0.00034879678,0.6495901,0.00032793242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006737498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070785696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6491905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019989826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086504745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60991883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150137566","doi":"10.3138/cpp.33.2.147","title":"Why Did Employment and Earnings Rise among Lone Mothers in Canada during the 1980s and 1990s?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Educational attainment; Earnings; Baby boom; Demographic economics; Census; Economics; Labour economics; Demography; Economic growth; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.009415403395903974,"score_gpt":0.2294119012976096,"score_spread":0.21999649790170564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150137566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9770315,0.00022721033,0.0000036534725,0.012929535,0.00009841158,0.00018373,0.000029359875,0.000013232688,0.009483315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99497026,0.0001912351,0.000008588587,0.0036519023,0.00016655635,0.000006416296,0.0000022574595,0.000014617688,0.0009881915],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845004,0.0000788455,0.00015949017,0.00020872203,0.00021788962,0.00088499207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870247,0.00006307788,0.00005237534,0.00015191291,0.00003580542,0.0009943614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005814937,0.00011659649,0.000119861106,0.00030892622,0.00064051367,0.00015109469,0.00021729514,0.00007410439,0.00002211179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020907169,0.00010767589,0.00001550942,0.00061771245,0.00032911755,0.00017460715,0.000032379787,0.00018067213,8.8069226e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001025041,0.000002619654,0.98371434,0.000004359554,0.0000088729585,0.000021655991,0.0094866175,0.0000034169761,0.0000027815327,0.0037927623,0.0012660839,0.001695477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001624682,0.0000039610986,0.88638663,0.00000545323,0.0000023703992,0.0000015144084,0.010872874,0.000027533892,6.5920426e-7,0.00010336639,0.10231501,0.00011813075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99989563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101048924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020152894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055442615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9835282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150561875","doi":"10.1016/s0167-6296(03)00058-4","title":"Estimating price elasticities when there is smuggling: the sensitivity of smoking to price in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Price elasticity of demand; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Alcohol consumption; Context (archaeology); Econometrics; Elasticity (physics); Yield (engineering); Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Alcohol","score_opus":0.032520742387627755,"score_gpt":0.28079057994281154,"score_spread":0.24826983755518378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150561875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891852,0.00033340865,0.0037318836,0.003760261,0.0008644461,0.00014432085,0.000011518842,0.0000023132889,0.001966661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921609,0.00023438335,0.005207423,0.002246259,0.00011306605,7.5177263e-7,1.5249334e-7,0.00000900582,0.00002806412],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824697,0.00041328624,0.0007268672,0.000096867094,0.0001670841,0.0003489065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980803,0.00070993736,0.0008194685,0.00010497687,0.0001453591,0.00013996218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043169907,0.00008734686,0.00032027005,0.000071218,0.00027687062,0.000034608558,0.0001691118,0.000042117703,0.000015450853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005741258,0.000074320174,0.00004385306,0.0001284417,0.000045167606,0.00013150253,0.00001909317,0.00025092706,4.4262143e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030511092,0.00008021065,0.622878,0.00018295419,0.00008728997,0.00001669104,0.18512627,0.16605102,0.000010525158,0.017616695,0.0014412184,0.0064786053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012899002,0.00029104078,0.4294501,0.0005664265,0.000046128236,0.00007108818,0.46468642,0.046106618,0.000057015764,0.016169615,0.04058565,0.0006799985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5556315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8265891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27956015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014115137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007533506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99809283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150644089","doi":"","title":"A roundtable discussion on decentralization, local development and women’s empowerment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Universitas Forum","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Empowerment; Latin Americans; Political science; Context (archaeology); Poverty; Public relations; Economic growth; Sociology; Geography; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.012185525911419144,"score_gpt":0.24190185324767388,"score_spread":0.22971632733625474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150644089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96838385,0.00010554113,0.0150924465,0.0011725384,0.00046832397,0.00016655574,0.0000051474185,0.00005370758,0.014551877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99286306,0.00007139874,0.0003262767,0.00028399614,0.000028507375,0.0000019398856,0.000012788196,0.0000059774698,0.0064060334],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990196,0.000041945623,0.00007454314,0.000120697405,0.00022397848,0.0005191865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960876,0.000011058456,0.000031650936,0.000072196744,0.000032514992,0.00024381485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019044384,0.00008192559,0.00007322099,0.00006200378,0.0006696444,0.000049209186,0.000087869405,0.00006331995,0.00013336577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008555418,0.00006503481,0.000015004418,0.00014525303,0.000071951334,0.0004948264,0.00005243443,0.00004585098,0.000022640053],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005047888,0.00019747621,0.46187973,0.0000110061155,0.000044940512,0.000004786134,0.22102402,0.00009900423,0.000012795352,0.30340078,0.008266587,0.0050084037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034489518,0.00004227064,0.032284256,0.000012872613,0.000009631451,4.5409573e-7,0.43948007,0.000036169076,0.000016485425,0.00046371616,0.52714103,0.00016813395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016160049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035991074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51887447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011005664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011761901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5150431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150835394","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.967556","title":"Are Youths on Income Support Less Happy? Evidence from Australia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Income Support; Child support; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05358193022127024,"score_gpt":0.3348184153988461,"score_spread":0.2812364851775759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150835394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991495,0.00055634,0.00400451,0.00075171335,0.0009956097,0.00012811739,0.000012646974,0.000053503638,0.0020025352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907473,0.0021071858,0.00008416202,0.0002444955,0.0011659465,0.0000015245622,0.000003444926,0.00002108225,0.005624871],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953623,0.00018166847,0.00038578428,0.0003013409,0.00082430855,0.0029446303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987278,0.0002301167,0.00036002471,0.00022445888,0.00017418333,0.00028341776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00403037,0.00019975875,0.00024051119,0.00013951445,0.0007177046,0.00014849575,0.0006734385,0.00021698493,0.00014595369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003576409,0.00018718217,0.00014736924,0.00035906644,0.0001730736,0.00034556142,0.000035550056,0.0019625786,0.00016782671],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010828149,0.000107337415,0.8941948,0.0000046018667,0.00012761568,0.00007327197,0.009442844,0.000049782862,0.00016132997,0.09076538,0.0003115337,0.0046532457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005903619,0.00037738975,0.62465525,0.00018020596,0.00008617558,0.000041760337,0.22420627,0.000016188142,0.0000400513,0.14602107,0.0032038698,0.000581403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006049421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1346087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26953954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017622351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002005836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9144956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151465340","doi":"","title":"The Economics of Marriage 30 Years after Becker","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positive economics; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01276140004645515,"score_gpt":0.24391283025064506,"score_spread":0.2311514302041899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151465340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76939994,0.00009054255,0.00007296012,0.00011204431,0.00032828038,0.000066336725,0.0000036377844,0.000010694854,0.22991559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891786,0.00045393346,0.0003863242,0.00024211427,0.00004255114,0.000004615815,3.5249255e-7,0.000005350559,0.0096861385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994898,0.00006773297,0.00011012234,0.00008364213,0.00007477772,0.00017391544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996856,0.000066151224,0.000031971853,0.00014030066,0.000030150071,0.000045817313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004239988,0.00004253886,0.000062059065,0.000012683281,0.0001230126,0.00003509955,0.00012822321,0.000052277115,0.00047576326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004913555,0.000032279153,0.000043314463,0.000063273306,0.0001681435,0.00004840648,0.000012975753,0.00004062958,0.00006367352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049312503,0.000027560576,0.09586969,0.000002489166,0.000023829893,0.0000014382344,0.011235296,0.000017730119,0.000013520493,0.8895205,0.0017876863,0.0014952759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033256662,0.00003116461,0.2545915,0.00000353122,0.000018726683,3.930709e-7,0.051601205,0.0000837293,0.000035134013,0.036381487,0.6566837,0.00023687011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038976563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003233706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85313904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028985874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010573352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5209274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151946145","doi":"","title":"Le financement des services de garde des enfants: effets sur le travail, le revenu des familles, et les finances publiques","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Income tax; Welfare economics; Political science; Child care; Tax deduction; Family income; Public funding; Economics; Gross income; Tax reform; Economic growth; Public economics; State income tax; Public administration","score_opus":0.02097770306673645,"score_gpt":0.24353846625807787,"score_spread":0.22256076319134144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151946145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9281524,0.049652383,0.0013224022,0.00078004564,0.000698019,0.00075341924,0.0018849198,0.00011311937,0.016643317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8261679,0.15195692,0.0041348115,0.000078792866,0.00018986144,0.0000074110444,0.0007443745,0.000047145117,0.016672831],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99461687,0.0013151199,0.0008021689,0.0014397675,0.00068018615,0.0011458857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959359,0.00035608312,0.0012274788,0.001393833,0.0005795549,0.00050716195],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015501172,0.00075523695,0.0011071492,0.0001824219,0.0034259097,0.00031851212,0.0021236953,0.0007000264,0.00002798556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000111343805,0.0008965642,0.00025533012,0.00025814297,0.004200469,0.0026370713,0.0018775293,0.0005708799,0.000006538763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085659325,0.004840667,0.67853194,0.0064459317,0.003173456,0.0007157642,0.07537626,0.0006991576,0.0013111721,0.047083676,0.020505754,0.1604596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027251618,0.0002090936,0.6203963,0.002029232,0.0007845088,0.00005958808,0.035749182,0.0002550233,0.00018590622,0.00555799,0.33073232,0.0013156674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6150435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44753554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31022656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006888785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020052865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152754212","doi":"10.1257/aer.104.11.3701","title":"Fertility Transitions Along the Extensive and Intensive Margins","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; Margin (machine learning); Opportunity cost; Demographic economics; Quality (philosophy); Labour economics; Population; Demography; Microeconomics; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.020965879603665586,"score_gpt":0.28730187611351493,"score_spread":0.26633599650984935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152754212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89953095,0.023664484,0.0011450172,0.04225711,0.00045073478,0.0010072249,0.00004238493,0.00007256948,0.031829517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9090042,0.07380822,0.00012796343,0.016818054,0.00006801988,0.000027115557,0.0000053522413,0.0000088424595,0.00013221969],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988748,0.0003481561,0.00024098452,0.00024523743,0.000058736543,0.00023207422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914944,0.00021190492,0.0001409736,0.0002842531,0.000106459236,0.000106995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069735484,0.00010792101,0.0003462272,0.00001748694,0.000336852,0.00003729419,0.00018733619,0.000021380332,0.00006956894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023655433,0.000082405415,0.00009453562,0.00010471695,0.0010622033,0.00009213764,0.000025152876,0.00010271752,0.00008553249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017129114,0.00007216794,0.10046662,0.00059332344,0.00027769437,0.0000053355175,0.043180663,0.00003780302,0.000025498082,0.123596326,0.020406667,0.71132076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013456035,0.000057396897,0.6792671,0.00023833395,0.00013948105,0.0000045499983,0.03406623,0.00035669195,4.1274345e-7,0.001821109,0.2836315,0.00028262503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004818102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006839675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7110382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007804059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103297214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72835606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154139850","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.01500.x","title":"Estimating labour supply elasticities under rationing: a structural model of time allocation behaviour","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationing; Time allocation; Economics; Wage; Work (physics); Sample (material); Labour supply; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Wage rate; Economic growth; Health care","score_opus":0.07419924410724899,"score_gpt":0.21521190358926615,"score_spread":0.14101265948201716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154139850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945972,0.000066541805,0.0017712587,0.0017485537,0.00066663657,0.00016964294,0.00016663657,0.000007759474,0.0008057504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927319,0.000027634225,0.0054835654,0.00042528473,0.00044002337,0.0000024254732,0.000020327512,0.000022096607,0.0008466877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835855,0.0000761694,0.00076036726,0.00020641433,0.000008308409,0.0005902186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997656,0.00007730087,0.0006667458,0.00018521838,0.00042434246,0.0009904205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062968535,0.00019295106,0.0004244488,0.00042420244,0.00040128917,0.00015329818,0.00044027172,0.0001853549,0.00012577948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022839337,0.00024354868,0.0001376254,0.00012252471,0.00022228925,0.0005911547,0.000007160829,0.00023914599,0.0000040222867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011127631,0.000005153805,0.010485896,0.000007998214,0.000028568395,0.0000063491443,0.011207069,0.46139398,0.000060059796,0.5163063,0.00007448068,0.00041305064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072373176,0.00031090018,0.026276413,0.000116617426,0.00009888579,0.00006566945,0.011281772,0.40347174,0.00004401815,0.55690175,0.00012934954,0.00057914003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15690625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.939872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7829658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016350247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052132704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154298374","doi":"","title":"Domestic Violence and Women's Autonomy: Evidence from India","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Reservation; Autonomy; Bargaining power; Resource (disambiguation); Resource allocation; Power (physics); Developing country; Economics; Poison control; Economic growth; Suicide prevention; Political science; Environmental health; Medicine; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.032844804594788515,"score_gpt":0.2765732493154975,"score_spread":0.24372844472070898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154298374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97777164,0.00044110778,0.0010686325,0.00005756145,0.00028291924,0.000114439055,0.00000467178,0.00009263192,0.02016642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941479,0.001488791,0.0030865786,0.00036534353,0.00007335187,0.000015744065,7.1170786e-7,0.0000058025857,0.0008157876],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905974,0.00007938533,0.00012251847,0.00024381587,0.00017174448,0.00032281448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993598,0.00019207904,0.000043151766,0.00015996624,0.000046297093,0.00019872675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035516458,0.000089861824,0.00011705088,0.000037642443,0.00022822764,0.000055508026,0.00024443917,0.00008467312,0.00065309723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016725285,0.000080956146,0.000017871602,0.00016863056,0.00027779734,0.00028620125,0.000060213162,0.000083080246,0.00008296568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008922779,0.000037531758,0.75079,0.000006371283,0.000016341985,0.000012541023,0.21785392,7.2285275e-7,0.000077928904,0.019469813,0.000038310376,0.0116876215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116288036,0.0000436226,0.922014,0.00007944124,0.000010700803,4.1608007e-7,0.034191582,0.000099683755,0.000011488558,0.042595003,0.00064332754,0.0001944321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075399284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007568761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18366233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011991084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034713474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155298130","doi":"","title":"Welfare Reforms and the Living Standards of Single Mothers: Evidence from Canadian Provinces. *","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Difference in differences; Welfare; Propensity score matching; Standard of living; Natural experiment; Welfare reform; Matching (statistics); Demographic economics; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Control (management); Baseline (sea); Single mothers; Significant difference; Treatment and control groups; Impact evaluation; Public economics; Demography; Political science; Psychology; Econometrics; Statistics; Sociology","score_opus":0.031152737677958564,"score_gpt":0.312613417769626,"score_spread":0.2814606800916674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155298130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8568947,0.0012952005,0.000009976345,0.0029221645,0.00047172338,0.0012499946,0.00048218068,0.000026618924,0.13664748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976795,0.02215408,0.00025930148,0.000057000667,0.00018520496,0.000060190414,0.000009865578,0.000033006294,0.00044632962],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689174,0.00057369116,0.0004989474,0.0006472017,0.00059878075,0.00078961864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975046,0.00092977897,0.00022107539,0.0007213247,0.00031186148,0.00031139722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062938146,0.00022000837,0.0004759651,0.0002856321,0.0006209718,0.0003142893,0.0010522436,0.0004570868,0.000076219316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028008358,0.00017959645,0.000114129405,0.0001727765,0.0020169152,0.00019976466,0.00056015,0.0010080916,8.8839346e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040354827,0.00029232274,0.2590289,0.0009231746,0.00052562606,0.000067504574,0.39824972,0.026628176,0.00008029613,0.029997298,0.000062658124,0.28374076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003355247,0.0003997882,0.22649136,0.0088540325,0.00011341999,0.0000053138615,0.6285506,0.010867572,0.00004424851,0.06648486,0.052338023,0.0024955631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6762014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9021075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2812452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057132067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077880365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155543056","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-5890.2007.00059.x","title":"Joint Taxation and the Labour Supply of Married Women: Evidence from the Canadian Tax Reform of 1988*","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fiscal Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Tax reform; Labour economics; Tax credit; Liberian dollar; State income tax; Indirect tax; Value-added tax; Direct tax; Ad valorem tax; Tax rate; Labour supply; Double taxation; Monetary economics; Public economics; Finance","score_opus":0.04063218779412085,"score_gpt":0.28896647848853085,"score_spread":0.24833429069441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155543056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860455,0.0027026115,0.000020376156,0.008212514,0.00020106779,0.00020171441,0.00009342658,0.00000609503,0.0025166895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971896,0.0017308234,0.00007691182,0.00033885715,0.00011590646,0.000010675077,0.000001621041,0.0000033538904,0.00053227384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990089,0.00011278306,0.00022042892,0.00010863488,0.0002966381,0.0002526437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989496,0.00048764082,0.00019718567,0.00012856766,0.00016559617,0.00007142129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018283263,0.00007239419,0.0001907193,0.000024197318,0.00061952765,0.000020911733,0.00017512978,0.00005275708,0.00001919292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009972579,0.00003799338,0.000033366152,0.00021070449,0.00097452564,0.00006969732,0.00006044675,0.000086543936,0.0000013916069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008802937,0.000015985006,0.47500628,0.000031191317,0.00018061601,0.0000019178988,0.4670007,0.000005421185,0.000093004484,0.05358819,0.0017439226,0.0022447533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017424268,0.000021222417,0.79098123,0.000030231962,0.000012635438,8.1236024e-8,0.20067881,0.000008699303,0.00002330925,0.005908183,0.0021158094,0.000045523728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6768743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9421889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31597498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027486132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012294395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47649685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156580463","doi":"10.3138/cpp.39.4.491","title":"Fighting Poverty: Assessing the Effect of Guaranteed Minimum Income Proposals in Quebec","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Subsidy; Economics; Poverty; Wage; Minimum wage; Demographic economics; Sample (material); Labour economics; Econometrics; Accounting; Economic growth","score_opus":0.012657779648727496,"score_gpt":0.2856102362763241,"score_spread":0.2729524566275966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156580463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9223061,0.000082889645,0.0000052231585,0.0170392,0.00020457125,0.00052711216,0.00002106965,0.000027807195,0.05978603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99573296,0.000007551155,0.000025346026,0.0020602262,0.0002827689,0.000037616766,0.000006173354,0.000016493428,0.0018308316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978524,0.00051784475,0.0002913073,0.00019578099,0.0002706207,0.0008720462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875885,0.00031219187,0.00011423221,0.00027964608,0.000109266955,0.00042581893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010793403,0.00014382065,0.00024101083,0.0005418538,0.0004679721,0.00045989864,0.00058287085,0.00016253573,0.00008958672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016437231,0.00010661103,0.00006971469,0.0013260792,0.00030226004,0.00056867424,0.000037484715,0.00019831643,0.000033683402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012459303,0.0000138433315,0.8898361,0.00005229653,0.000030452991,0.000008206089,0.015972562,0.0000040033,0.0001886145,0.06610951,0.005913559,0.02186965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007572622,0.00006614056,0.9297301,0.00009830266,0.000015320655,0.0000031975462,0.014372725,0.0012077208,0.000032856435,0.0033171803,0.04995109,0.00044808522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9897679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9834926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073426895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009000128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006965585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156819251","doi":"10.1017/s0008423911000771","title":"The Organizational and Electoral Determinants of the Provincial Funding of Private Education in Canada: A Quantile Regression Analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Quantile regression; Private education; Welfare economics; Order (exchange); Public administration; Economics; Higher education; Finance; Law; Econometrics","score_opus":0.02198551524528621,"score_gpt":0.2828252470603748,"score_spread":0.2608397318150886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156819251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99904597,0.00004493989,0.000021625674,0.0001953521,0.00027091106,0.0000518492,0.00000779893,3.3325662e-7,0.00036120188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997902,0.000004160689,0.00009995528,0.000045701683,0.000033306926,2.425644e-7,9.079089e-8,0.0000017199334,0.000024631934],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988124,0.00008809885,0.00026631774,0.000072803356,0.00037149613,0.0003889075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888134,0.00007013362,0.00019182055,0.00007979123,0.00035241,0.00042451607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008834783,0.00004228667,0.00011157227,0.00015984026,0.0004100943,0.000025797208,0.0004362427,0.000024776245,0.000012961054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012539239,0.000025450043,0.000026227217,0.0012787423,0.0009381212,0.00012437285,0.000019025536,0.0000834442,4.9861836e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013003857,0.0000045502766,0.8372608,0.0000019013107,0.0000026364175,8.9681964e-7,0.0011811119,0.0000012058056,0.000065995504,0.16125207,0.0000049393348,0.00022259462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003168394,0.000012240588,0.992819,0.000021629683,0.000019198225,0.0000023611583,0.0043507456,0.00013929169,0.00019699468,0.0023557725,0.000019852643,0.000031196643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9741769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99864185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1588963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007354227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04798643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95741063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157035097","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8578.2006.00038.x","title":"Effects of Family Policy Reforms in Norway: Results from a Joint Labour Supply and Childcare Choice Microsimulation Analysis*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fiscal Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thornhill Medical (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Labour supply; Microsimulation; Economics; Labour economics; Work (physics); Population; Parental leave; Demographic economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.016957707322034006,"score_gpt":0.2931989255258062,"score_spread":0.2762412182037722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157035097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99449515,0.0024557216,0.000026877737,0.0007377889,0.00008806893,0.00023125103,0.0002660565,0.000022853037,0.0016761998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981728,0.0007677094,0.00020465742,0.000122671,0.00027741518,0.00000919798,0.000049421385,0.000007107684,0.00038902252],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986634,0.000118090065,0.00036885418,0.00028823162,0.00027142558,0.00028996688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992071,0.0003615002,0.000144782,0.00012270651,0.0001162242,0.000047701844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002526815,0.00014245554,0.00041212028,0.00021240342,0.00025191723,0.000031479427,0.000101411504,0.000107211126,0.0000010093189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047389965,0.00011518951,0.000086955006,0.0010424338,0.00021737935,0.00008305582,0.00008613468,0.00010009915,0.000002347034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044995595,0.00010936765,0.9570992,0.000054101605,0.00027597157,0.000004151929,0.036302842,0.00081751816,0.0018184304,0.0024652106,0.0001958195,0.0008123949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091392186,0.000030455747,0.9884889,0.000038489987,0.00009295213,2.8214444e-8,0.006745313,0.00013541647,0.00007454143,0.0028313466,0.00051747117,0.0001311289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13229595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09837147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03392448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015746626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004014871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9180809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157268226","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.902895","title":"Learning from a Piece of Pie: The Empirical Content of Nash Bargaining","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining problem; Content (measure theory); Economics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0485532633363369,"score_gpt":0.29112994415582444,"score_spread":0.24257668081948752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157268226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98482186,0.002470364,0.0052766846,0.00059683865,0.00014215095,0.00007497864,0.000002327679,0.00001501203,0.0065997737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99670756,0.0015528759,0.000094244795,0.0000617995,0.00033849143,0.0000012308261,0.000002672092,0.000011168412,0.0012299661],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755883,0.0003432148,0.00036633696,0.00012341427,0.00048114688,0.0011270279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991106,0.00023156242,0.00031285116,0.000101384896,0.0001948496,0.000048779693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022827438,0.00009648563,0.0002065221,0.000050989132,0.00044856317,0.000032855543,0.00035755645,0.00008866305,0.000025208166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020876044,0.00007115954,0.00013697094,0.0002495485,0.00023037099,0.00009108828,0.00003105439,0.0011914268,0.0000031633456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005512696,0.00014506326,0.60778964,0.0000034035506,0.00020873,0.0000025349477,0.024035541,0.0010911833,0.0034985028,0.35550955,0.00015814485,0.007502601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013334246,0.0005306307,0.20908271,0.000052636668,0.00012585228,0.000021746797,0.3671239,0.0011511659,0.00011149633,0.4169487,0.0032218131,0.0002958958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063129403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008743015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3987069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033201315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019649372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95433193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157895906","doi":"10.1080/03670244.2014.911178","title":"The Role of Women in Food Provision and Food Choice Decision-Making in Singapore: A Case Study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology of Food and Nutrition","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Food choice; Environmental health; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.010092053788097863,"score_gpt":0.27272361856302013,"score_spread":0.2626315647749223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157895906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99859524,0.00058689015,0.0000115122375,0.00007725778,0.0000715925,0.00048427752,0.0000046599753,0.0000058381625,0.00016271239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996548,0.0001550154,0.00010101482,0.000013657899,0.000031067753,0.00003883985,5.516692e-7,0.000003897468,0.0000011046218],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989753,0.000270682,0.00024400261,0.00016156786,0.00010896036,0.00023949335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885947,0.00085940765,0.000107305015,0.00007970422,0.000051675772,0.000042469117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001341702,0.00006467922,0.0001878525,0.00011852008,0.00021478742,0.000016502909,0.00007310568,0.000102232814,0.0000011151493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042917771,0.000055599656,0.000015365484,0.00020806475,0.00016362719,0.000085253276,0.00003923087,0.00009152555,7.451957e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010112775,0.0012606395,0.8868719,0.000051999163,0.000025210338,0.0000064280352,0.07041516,0.0000049960936,0.00016228977,0.003978182,0.0000049368655,0.037117124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026418807,0.0077733616,0.65752584,0.000084399384,0.000010524449,0.000015081532,0.24017191,0.0003581953,0.000024554958,0.09095759,0.0003159299,0.000120727804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002684406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0762456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22934605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006359112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004259679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9406105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157941010","doi":"","title":"From Policy to Research and Back Again","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economics; Welfare economics","score_opus":0.09773078633901698,"score_gpt":0.379726229570854,"score_spread":0.281995443231837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157941010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5965637,0.00003245279,0.0000019033573,0.0008610935,0.00009776843,0.00031579338,0.000028026378,0.000014738457,0.40208453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97881544,0.005583669,0.00166606,0.0003079021,0.00064046023,0.000054396514,0.000009664987,0.000035848705,0.01288655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968885,0.00060882,0.0002876486,0.0006029547,0.00041019774,0.0012018704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980199,0.00068505877,0.000031462663,0.00050849846,0.00020823599,0.00054687803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004111508,0.00012575128,0.0002191295,0.0006242305,0.0005484853,0.00015557406,0.00066143525,0.00022054091,0.00037902824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010967487,0.00013916328,0.00003929579,0.0006503503,0.0009283644,0.000177332,0.0003931335,0.00061737414,0.00020808003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003191811,0.00060430955,0.34974614,0.00004151099,0.000102385784,0.000075466945,0.26158005,0.00006704761,0.0008858233,0.09512835,0.0025956936,0.28885403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012537157,0.0005371995,0.32659018,0.00009729962,0.0000039203555,0.0000020202558,0.21679403,0.00066916837,0.0001303152,0.09326541,0.35986307,0.00079366897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023880923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019570569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38919798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007119474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008524048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158993225","doi":"","title":"Sterilisation and the work careers of women","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Work (physics); Work hours; Demographic economics; Psychology; Maternity leave; Demography; Medicine; Working hours; Labour economics; Economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03181957056400616,"score_gpt":0.3102223683307914,"score_spread":0.2784027977667853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158993225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87495273,0.0001780692,0.0000010542943,0.00036884865,0.00025964546,0.0005840766,0.000022579445,0.000013201101,0.12361981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96952206,0.028311828,0.000092285605,0.000056128378,0.00015294761,0.00013050469,0.000012485649,0.000019242612,0.001702493],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997428,0.00078548555,0.0003970104,0.0004223709,0.00031441168,0.0006527192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984184,0.0006901682,0.00013591457,0.00050850847,0.00009639714,0.00015060385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005097788,0.00014642585,0.00038557226,0.00019439029,0.00026822128,0.00013550471,0.00058355246,0.0003361855,0.00007781183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038792499,0.00013055502,0.00008120028,0.00017392053,0.0017145561,0.000064831125,0.00037749507,0.0007516795,0.0000019790941],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094830873,0.00012345689,0.15534954,0.00023690019,0.00023014864,0.000006980108,0.4222994,0.012267431,0.0000071785994,0.012846557,0.00006481951,0.39561924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042838445,0.00014736954,0.3425683,0.00043603024,0.000038628776,0.0000016531121,0.5147719,0.0050977343,0.0000057374837,0.056897525,0.07456722,0.001184087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017346595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020304085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39443517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011661625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084507925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6317353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159164094","doi":"","title":"Female activity choice in a dual context: an integrated model for formal and informal sectors in cameroon","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Earnings; Economics; Informal sector; Sample (material); Estimation; Consistency (knowledge bases); Work (physics); Developing country; Labour economics; Labour supply; Function (biology); Dual (grammatical number); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Accounting; Computer science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.05819473459855485,"score_gpt":0.3496767513677718,"score_spread":0.291482016769217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159164094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874251,0.000047171307,0.00007729186,0.000058125766,0.0002715082,0.0016112258,0.00017857058,0.000026497679,0.010304494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99592245,0.0021006472,0.0005430017,0.00008226721,0.000085385385,0.0003512518,0.00007357569,0.000041723524,0.0007997152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643874,0.0004919144,0.00062596647,0.0007906441,0.0002870401,0.0013657104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836546,0.0005429468,0.0001825374,0.00044959725,0.00016359542,0.00029587257],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004423595,0.00033633263,0.0006321632,0.00071574305,0.0003155035,0.00023958256,0.00042084994,0.00083363516,0.000010262333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089207804,0.0003857901,0.00010099069,0.00029605077,0.0005430228,0.00077569304,0.00039238308,0.0018942837,6.883436e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068530435,0.00065322424,0.53004116,0.0003756265,0.00007142462,0.000023814739,0.091859534,0.10976311,0.000059196394,0.0032474254,0.000011939743,0.2632082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024672328,0.00019601667,0.18637696,0.0001584135,0.0000076255546,0.000002328811,0.07193946,0.735243,0.000011445897,0.0007982852,0.001997501,0.0008016968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014604147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48367625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62547994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015332992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025064505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159891818","doi":"10.7202/601447ar","title":"Revenu, caractéristiques sociodémographiques et dépenses des ménages au Canada en 1978 et 1982","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.036819261228438635,"score_gpt":0.298472572904055,"score_spread":0.26165331167561634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159891818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90464497,0.004633311,0.0002593449,0.031257387,0.0015024893,0.00048462773,0.00061798916,0.00018113792,0.056418747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9500127,0.018649498,0.0022976256,0.018061928,0.0010760686,0.00003031975,0.000110361514,0.000046669884,0.009714858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478924,0.0021866632,0.00078383787,0.0007640721,0.00026492644,0.001211256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996878,0.0014154406,0.0004071325,0.00052783807,0.00026467862,0.0005069027],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021175425,0.0006314882,0.0007924613,0.00014097066,0.0006946401,0.00028496134,0.00073073566,0.00066365337,0.00014742377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006084291,0.00069750287,0.00032584133,0.00043597497,0.00091828784,0.000897129,0.000093486306,0.00076248444,0.000024041765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030273268,0.00025390834,0.047424626,0.00014316179,0.00021992592,0.000067801506,0.1039798,0.000120588345,0.00013568702,0.8188807,0.013384951,0.015358601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004150153,0.00027162454,0.4981357,0.00030452939,0.00013921925,0.000018524492,0.024986558,0.00006039615,0.00019685517,0.12917253,0.34508014,0.0012189216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9478275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98197675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6897081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019224873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005487018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160280749","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x10000073","title":"Global Householding amid Global Crises","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Pooling; Sociocultural evolution; Politics; Order (exchange); Population; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Unit (ring theory); Reproduction; Sociology; Political economy; Economy; Geography; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.05282907680598626,"score_gpt":0.33829756087689744,"score_spread":0.2854684840709112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160280749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7425266,0.00012578779,0.0013026743,0.00039213322,0.0026160064,0.00013149189,0.00020809377,0.0002452568,0.252452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99428254,0.00006762976,0.0019501549,0.0015572743,0.0013002421,0.0000059893673,0.000010482247,0.000017946672,0.0008077106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771655,0.000090132104,0.000243627,0.0003467844,0.00057316414,0.0010297513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886346,0.000052794487,0.00007148275,0.00036294418,0.00018676609,0.00046253565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033457912,0.00020223873,0.00018901774,0.000033554206,0.00070304296,0.00020586778,0.00048328142,0.0002618806,0.00014177928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023034014,0.00021466444,0.00012118789,0.00038338648,0.0004413799,0.00017402838,0.00010342997,0.0002070606,0.00010070776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012526722,0.00005039233,0.2939436,0.000007585802,0.000021401684,0.000007405751,0.0029020975,0.000016575927,0.0000317847,0.7005102,0.0022842058,0.00022347228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004788322,0.000024951276,0.603742,0.0000059108297,0.00009118031,0.000016960601,0.026332775,0.00019405084,0.00001615916,0.2472488,0.12119515,0.0006532217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055045076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004154386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45326144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034818865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060436083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8753762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161568344","doi":"10.1016/j.labeco.2011.01.007","title":"Curbing Cream-Skimming: Evidence on Enrolment Incentives","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Context (archaeology); Shadow (psychology); Government (linguistics); Margin (machine learning); Business; Demographic economics; Shadow price; Public sector; Population; Public economics; Labour economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Environmental health; Medicine; Psychology; Geography; Economy","score_opus":0.03331720020638623,"score_gpt":0.29105741367332794,"score_spread":0.2577402134669417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161568344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9686573,0.00030427673,0.00020385852,0.0022535631,0.0007005169,0.00019039903,0.000012031128,0.00008405539,0.027593993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990353,0.0034629675,0.0006124851,0.0026863462,0.0004071797,0.0000054371103,0.0000036387385,0.000012109189,0.0024568764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986945,0.00009530901,0.00026108132,0.0003514139,0.00013078655,0.00046695292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991894,0.00017171941,0.00013911641,0.00026997188,0.000060163056,0.00016965487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006067057,0.0001576407,0.00020055367,0.00007596691,0.00047202074,0.0002150406,0.0003957494,0.00011995694,0.00009299412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001650854,0.00017508514,0.00008186802,0.00014270259,0.000110864865,0.0004411745,0.000034462217,0.00015934983,0.00013175147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024722074,0.00015628505,0.027300287,0.000005795506,0.000017850884,0.000003758339,0.01287057,0.00054213655,0.0000953186,0.9505984,0.000101825855,0.008283053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012386052,0.0007845343,0.47984636,0.00029216058,0.00005677055,0.0000024417593,0.04023455,0.00085100735,0.0005584727,0.26659667,0.2079947,0.0015437314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044949198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005291283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68400174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036566544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020459745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71397644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161595035","doi":"10.7202/1003586ar","title":"L’action publique et la première naissance au Canada","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02306860561011166,"score_gpt":0.2509390334816753,"score_spread":0.22787042787156364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161595035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72876525,0.006241351,0.00079917617,0.0018358182,0.0045511015,0.00031001138,0.000121453064,0.00012168421,0.25725415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802476,0.007776158,0.0007367146,0.002899805,0.0004883971,0.00004902241,0.000027318858,0.000062871106,0.007712106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962295,0.0009224158,0.00043108917,0.0006017283,0.00058197195,0.0012332726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979516,0.00028291467,0.00027488478,0.00048647902,0.00027818445,0.00072592444],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012714429,0.0004151,0.00037131846,0.00026471057,0.00090646284,0.000092504706,0.000652081,0.00084747694,0.000104087834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026338015,0.00048632687,0.0002622303,0.0020546832,0.0026152995,0.00060840556,0.000043718857,0.0010110856,0.000010078282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030908777,0.00018997867,0.3492107,0.00014078862,0.00021050297,0.00012085456,0.056999933,0.000032810345,0.000034663673,0.56475085,0.021615824,0.006662174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039459742,0.00008733911,0.33550188,0.00010540678,0.00015578934,0.000033176675,0.057154495,0.000060526963,0.000027888718,0.010085556,0.5956379,0.00075542566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99071264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99870384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5740221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013921144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00940961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161767329","doi":"10.1093/esr/jcm021","title":"Economic Inequality In and Outside of Marriage: Individual Resources and Institutional Context","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Sociological Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inequality; Context (archaeology); Economic inequality; Economics; Social inequality; Demographic economics; Income inequality metrics; Ideology; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.08318094108687775,"score_gpt":0.34202431981307324,"score_spread":0.2588433787261955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161767329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9248432,0.043593265,0.00005063597,0.00037310048,0.000054013966,0.00019426839,0.000021961265,0.000016181686,0.03085337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9421158,0.056165896,0.00016331236,0.0014142476,0.00008931282,0.0000012983683,0.000007146495,0.0000037660195,0.000039239672],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807876,0.00096812774,0.00041895392,0.00021162155,0.000121298,0.00020126419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992848,0.0003718567,0.00013289387,0.00008262559,0.000024961679,0.00010287978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006669436,0.00009224554,0.00029725293,0.00002647124,0.00014132382,0.000016546244,0.00015960967,0.00006547818,0.000052146625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081374723,0.00007308362,0.000043672888,0.00006951281,0.00096105225,0.000062505336,0.00011441637,0.00017306345,0.000014059287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000168743,0.0000647279,0.7723366,0.00039650183,0.000025598356,0.000035169385,0.017166631,0.0000015555322,0.000015710666,0.11763989,0.00043904412,0.091861665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020909365,0.00003522952,0.9479671,0.00021048193,0.000010434572,0.0000013133968,0.0039547184,0.000001036606,1.8400252e-7,0.0012619478,0.046248738,0.00009969951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015102042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026740754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1756305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042759086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004794173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35410368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162033867","doi":"10.7202/602252ar","title":"L’effet des politiques de financement des services de garde sur le choix des modes de garde des familles québécoises","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05424711382940153,"score_gpt":0.28185398340962947,"score_spread":0.22760686958022794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162033867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9608076,0.015293742,0.0065970058,0.0014418998,0.00024517608,0.0005371905,0.00025785196,0.00031467344,0.014504824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9104493,0.049949847,0.029538428,0.0032555982,0.0007684866,0.0000995262,0.000038306338,0.000090540416,0.0058099283],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99394846,0.0013018545,0.00090582535,0.0008955139,0.00022301513,0.0027253502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970752,0.00064844685,0.000372006,0.0005838961,0.00046053462,0.0008599193],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018253473,0.0008612835,0.0009021627,0.00019956476,0.0019121986,0.0006211973,0.0011104341,0.00075103523,0.00011438148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003845009,0.0009504477,0.00044315535,0.00029387148,0.0030543478,0.0012271677,0.0001556212,0.00044744514,0.00003877801],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017512478,0.0013781419,0.29719546,0.0014993455,0.00039471203,0.00006128179,0.44618866,0.007043707,0.0032560413,0.18859163,0.00059043994,0.05362543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081880303,0.00038734972,0.50046724,0.0008510994,0.00015776622,0.000039155602,0.052038908,0.0032840192,0.0031733068,0.42423078,0.013442104,0.0011094753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36934057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42487916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39414975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029661416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026581797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162197847","doi":"10.1353/dem.2005.0017","title":"Changes in children’s time with parents: A correction","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Demography; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.007880955319622993,"score_gpt":0.22623163521468423,"score_spread":0.21835067989506124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162197847","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31027234,0.0021116924,0.00025799483,0.56896394,0.0060543637,0.0036336735,0.0004818689,0.0011836408,0.1070405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10188119,0.004911323,0.0007077539,0.85103685,0.022300735,0.00043315385,0.0025860115,0.0002630481,0.015879946],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797857,0.0002020788,0.00017914643,0.0004652307,0.00055991387,0.0006150762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993827,0.000057529473,0.00015352038,0.00025378205,0.00008046199,0.000072042094],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024215628,0.00028762195,0.0003215857,0.00068118534,0.00024288376,0.00009785522,0.0003502189,0.00076101307,0.00012674846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016049276,0.0002679137,0.000121282836,0.0011583443,0.0002517921,0.000104270606,0.000022595352,0.0009836492,0.000050433635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054210445,0.00003757902,0.5411262,0.0000060621455,0.000068003676,0.000014687938,0.0021284062,0.0000068688964,4.7219547e-7,0.000016198213,0.4548845,0.001705603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003625423,0.00008447506,0.2860032,0.000102203856,0.000078776284,0.000006792998,0.0012609088,0.000039566177,4.3204375e-7,0.00011923751,0.71136457,0.0005772915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024006276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015837654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2820729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106842774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107579064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162376962","doi":"10.7202/013471ar","title":"La production domestique dans les modèles collectifs","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03412138074003479,"score_gpt":0.2628999199284128,"score_spread":0.22877853918837798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162376962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86697626,0.0017850572,0.002538485,0.0047228658,0.0025034987,0.0005196287,0.00007788283,0.00017854523,0.12069778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87039673,0.0019216824,0.0017610558,0.00021918221,0.0018957878,0.00007768773,0.00004088512,0.00005335621,0.12363361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969526,0.0010076194,0.00055719994,0.00067244255,0.00014021016,0.00066993095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857414,0.00044123927,0.00025663202,0.00038637093,0.00016810716,0.00017348812],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010619626,0.00037793515,0.00041110083,0.00012277161,0.00073392637,0.00021559323,0.00036759928,0.0007475192,0.00016920132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023294009,0.00042330124,0.00019504261,0.0005992751,0.0010698383,0.00045911816,0.000065690816,0.000451842,0.000100764206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000403451,0.0005312141,0.047729693,0.00014405075,0.00009473589,0.000021311602,0.046928715,0.006142732,0.0009664928,0.8821068,0.0070368554,0.0082571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063542137,0.00012746295,0.08705037,0.00014083224,0.00013630552,0.00006167035,0.036669664,0.0018948009,0.0011266323,0.13169344,0.7393443,0.0011191163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05156446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06796812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7504133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008717959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007231448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162537598","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511511493.002","title":"The State of Poverty: TANF Recipients","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; State (computer science); Economics; Computer science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.019119662060550033,"score_gpt":0.21527860557392892,"score_spread":0.19615894351337887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162537598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014575975,0.00021041684,0.00018989055,0.000024731005,0.00068240013,0.0003675711,0.00053477904,0.00006606566,0.9964666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035370116,0.0008828367,0.000027287204,0.000059726706,0.0001103419,3.241931e-7,0.00003166829,0.000028935183,0.99532187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984025,0.00009456143,0.00022253291,0.0003331994,0.0005633292,0.00038387446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858105,0.00014457322,0.00034307895,0.00046002923,0.00033538192,0.0001358775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027847255,0.0002466065,0.0003025951,0.0000933703,0.00075075985,0.000056740722,0.0008056298,0.00027075564,0.0000020794603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001832718,0.00023971644,0.00021264768,0.000017579016,0.00079015794,0.00007061029,0.00022614718,0.00032783873,0.0000070365445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046409565,0.000010427088,0.00007538257,0.00001790111,0.00010519054,0.00004026628,0.0006581014,0.00001171813,0.000006411174,0.91002315,0.08718384,0.0018211976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025834105,0.000023338322,0.0004393498,0.00005225553,0.000097770506,4.5737679e-7,0.00033666272,0.000023300552,0.0000075791145,0.00018713177,0.99831015,0.00026364418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039172634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040894377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9111263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030108797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032477925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97753525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162610442","doi":"","title":"Home Cooking, Food Consumption and Food Production among the Unemployed and Retired Households","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population Research Papers","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Calorie; Unemployment; Food consumption; Food processing; Production (economics); Economics; Consumer Expenditure Survey; Agricultural economics; Business; Food science; Economic growth; Medicine; Aggregate expenditure; Public economics; Biology","score_opus":0.06261858870734073,"score_gpt":0.3237504927530603,"score_spread":0.26113190404571957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162610442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978808,0.00013331858,0.0000010229647,0.0010157684,0.00014088204,0.0003201972,0.00001572634,0.000038100436,0.0004541945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991298,0.00039937772,0.00004181099,0.000018304845,0.00016194598,0.000010132718,0.000022836828,0.000011437337,0.00020438734],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987984,0.00028472743,0.00019994681,0.0002679147,0.00018570347,0.00026335474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999576,0.000093117276,0.00009086899,0.00010111044,0.000061006125,0.000077931494],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011754689,0.000084645566,0.00013558714,0.0000953656,0.0017721144,0.00011442226,0.00007001557,0.00009606114,0.0000052263904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049497474,0.00007119204,0.000024799683,0.00010582316,0.00090128614,0.00025429798,0.00005272113,0.00013709534,5.089253e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014279106,0.000027160906,0.9655042,0.000021810336,0.00002605571,1.8656056e-7,0.008337115,0.00013284342,0.00029663218,0.023662418,0.00014957711,0.001827704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024160591,0.00007698371,0.9825009,0.0000143467505,0.000013370373,5.617174e-7,0.010448935,0.00025960806,0.000007161037,0.006026607,0.0003099581,0.000099976794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00817308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021491645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017635811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073476636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048152066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162796931","doi":"10.15171/ijhpm.2014.127","title":"Localization of determinants of fertility through measurement adaptations in developing-country settings: The case of Iran Comment on “Analysis of economic determinants of fertility in Iran: a multilevel approach”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Developing country; Inequality; Work (physics); Economics; Demographic economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Population; Demography; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.10234910548972329,"score_gpt":0.39654667708085956,"score_spread":0.29419757159113624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162796931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832771,0.000094751245,0.01445027,0.0013747303,0.00011384403,0.0003481622,0.00006486593,0.0000012717808,0.00027502075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801767,0.000457387,0.0009147648,0.00058222294,0.000013244185,0.0000056128247,0.0000028896784,0.0000038727703,0.0000023263303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972238,0.0004405977,0.0015655932,0.00012934937,0.00048363264,0.00015704513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781036,0.0001687367,0.0015544934,0.00013850474,0.0002912419,0.000036663136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003806088,0.00009622244,0.0004894519,0.00049280265,0.000063494335,0.0000069499083,0.00027752088,0.00004492639,0.0000022502581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022075686,0.00007999857,0.000090814356,0.0003035285,0.00018070285,0.00010661754,0.000058686477,0.000071536655,3.9926334e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008246835,0.0019746418,0.7290525,0.0019717216,0.0010992888,0.000014295448,0.10152308,0.056642596,0.000014648721,0.048831113,0.000062388746,0.057989076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011984238,0.00014012001,0.920867,0.00044406095,0.000104820865,0.0000022392448,0.013430878,0.061249036,0.00006910129,0.0021691564,0.0002463139,0.0000788212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03411609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0360612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19181456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004441613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025328892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98152816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162943275","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdq003","title":"Consumption Inequality and Intra-household Allocations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Australian National University; Yale University","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Consumption (sociology); Inequality; Economics; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2062888121133496,"score_gpt":0.36607013279565354,"score_spread":0.15978132068230394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162943275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6226992,0.36303726,0.000038176997,0.0015146113,0.00038502488,0.0004570312,0.000017523607,0.00003164008,0.011819531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4436494,0.555854,0.00008142492,0.0003134364,0.000031694042,0.000012461421,5.342026e-7,0.000002396544,0.000054603745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993801,0.00014416318,0.00024717735,0.000093889146,0.000038446942,0.00009623175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994907,0.00015273358,0.00013862757,0.0001543924,0.000040317525,0.000023266506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011777354,0.000058990394,0.00022295647,0.000013235653,0.0002025406,0.000004713018,0.00012317699,0.00001880204,0.000033868768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001409175,0.000041517207,0.000036999394,0.000034005854,0.00048750674,0.000059366263,0.000046263143,0.000037571102,0.00001805596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065166923,0.000068408735,0.21597044,0.0038830948,0.0004847865,3.092077e-7,0.09098721,0.0000034958184,0.0000068562913,0.67107517,0.005743638,0.011770084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057584175,0.00010122904,0.7919374,0.0037917262,0.0007873203,0.0000032306236,0.08726551,0.000046510315,0.000021868706,0.06769358,0.04711191,0.00066388655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000488647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009676407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6033816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043032152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044302735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17962389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163462983","doi":"10.1257/000282802320191633","title":"All in the Family: A Simultaneous Model of Parenting Style and Child Conduct","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Parenting styles; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Developmental psychology; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.0724653101185468,"score_gpt":0.31407820395409736,"score_spread":0.24161289383555057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163462983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8948536,0.052189328,0.00003580285,0.002459035,0.000067948116,0.00054399634,0.000022824355,0.000018537849,0.049808946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76538926,0.23117198,0.00015827111,0.0031837786,0.00002314816,0.000009854954,0.0000016405321,0.000005903015,0.000056185254],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990321,0.00017642484,0.00031450062,0.00018715738,0.00007271516,0.00021712594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993241,0.00019443822,0.00022518773,0.00019598244,0.000014359977,0.000045968893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056992105,0.000094084295,0.00035197657,0.000026155545,0.00008582306,0.00002155272,0.00025304174,0.000019897701,0.000026161759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098149714,0.00007509266,0.00005808264,0.00011670871,0.00036339252,0.00007375397,0.000026180618,0.00009287371,0.000016763655],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010391168,0.00050297694,0.08422199,0.002006885,0.00027053754,0.000023218772,0.16282962,0.013658604,0.00006145465,0.04298602,0.0094023235,0.68402594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011283412,0.00024278073,0.015115833,0.0021211812,0.00036214956,0.00002138588,0.12741533,0.49310333,0.0000013370925,0.0016836186,0.35731548,0.0014892259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002852017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010300436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6825367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045331824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003460357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4311416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163470642","doi":"10.7202/602225ar","title":"L’impact des règles de prêts hypothécaires sur l’offre de travail des femmes au Canada : évidence paramétrique et non paramétrique","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.058055066045855815,"score_gpt":0.2985030460448982,"score_spread":0.24044797999904238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163470642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793262,0.004930882,0.002749187,0.0054707257,0.0005828127,0.00076594116,0.00030962809,0.0001566289,0.0057080262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747782,0.011141298,0.0029488942,0.0043219803,0.0007701784,0.000068624264,0.000035916382,0.000084836196,0.0058501232],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99323356,0.0018184945,0.001001052,0.0009732975,0.00032126272,0.0026523108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951689,0.0020071273,0.0004760007,0.0006889039,0.00034481124,0.0013142234],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025554765,0.00092764833,0.0010080187,0.00017095514,0.0010229782,0.0004972312,0.0011672612,0.00097498903,0.0001321729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016674207,0.0009729982,0.00043898934,0.0007271711,0.0014955826,0.0013521636,0.0000851344,0.0008844519,0.000024748993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022513374,0.00092571584,0.67387944,0.00042990936,0.00040706876,0.00030816763,0.13738,0.01454495,0.0011624709,0.049889363,0.0058093094,0.11503847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069463416,0.0004450062,0.92502713,0.00047620066,0.000106350264,0.00009039307,0.009428699,0.0022320463,0.0010122448,0.05082158,0.00845058,0.0012151396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96082383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98690134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2511477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070081996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019427773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163787203","doi":"10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.10.004","title":"What determines female autonomy? Evidence from Bangladesh","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Development Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":568,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Unearned income; Economics; Developing country; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Point (geometry); Public economics; Economic growth; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05551329499319924,"score_gpt":0.27514370546396116,"score_spread":0.21963041047076193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163787203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942751,0.0011289414,0.0004495863,0.000537931,0.0026637,0.00008401528,0.0000020799887,0.000015041861,0.0008436406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566152,0.016075492,0.024229122,0.00040782682,0.0006940976,0.00000284578,0.000002786435,0.000016728287,0.001955873],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986008,0.000066626155,0.00068728166,0.00017050689,0.0001820056,0.00029282298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987091,0.00023108476,0.0005233247,0.00013323009,0.00018976915,0.00021349259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065799645,0.00014157413,0.00030560943,0.00012041889,0.00041460036,0.00019115783,0.0004810379,0.00011529244,0.000111336536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001163995,0.00014178861,0.00010853585,0.00009895462,0.0001425967,0.0017831548,0.000055784294,0.00016007133,0.00004924186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042688087,0.000104277206,0.82027954,0.000010930955,0.0001751589,0.00009042154,0.16115281,0.0004541959,0.000092660186,0.00043855465,0.00073918805,0.01641959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083468406,0.00007742565,0.76712066,0.00030988237,0.000043990036,0.00006779456,0.036213994,0.00027186045,0.0005603034,0.0014009438,0.19246203,0.0006364419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000093913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000716081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19172284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006207547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030904682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5781972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164153711","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.678922","title":"Assessing the External Validity of an Experimental Wage Subsidy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn; Sugar Research and Development Corporation","keywords":"Earnings; Subsidy; Harm; Welfare; External validity; Wage; Demographic economics; Sample (material); Economics; Econometrics; Psychology; Labour economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0314099715571445,"score_gpt":0.34429118142412884,"score_spread":0.31288120986698437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164153711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99059504,0.0014872003,0.0033911625,0.00044220252,0.00029220225,0.000084301886,0.0000012295981,0.000021460217,0.0036851957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969996,0.0009168959,0.00038478212,0.000102436454,0.0010449961,0.0000017892105,9.967185e-7,0.000013391309,0.00053506985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717325,0.00045674652,0.00026054244,0.00014258227,0.00053167116,0.0014351917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993986,0.00006079202,0.00019166853,0.00015531432,0.00008676927,0.00010687272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036350628,0.0001117971,0.00013687504,0.000048409856,0.0008910762,0.00020095435,0.0005149262,0.000077894714,0.00006258664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043605804,0.000084020605,0.000110676214,0.00015689942,0.00020558378,0.0007532541,0.000028092505,0.00094379106,0.0000067533556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056610173,0.00121811,0.10990092,0.0000056528547,0.00018250076,0.000013709997,0.06839324,0.000535522,0.040233776,0.7175897,0.00009862447,0.061771624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020004793,0.00084520807,0.09950781,0.000047481422,0.00012534524,0.0003521371,0.73316205,0.0020289852,0.005193039,0.1507719,0.005186065,0.00077950093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005452512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050442177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6647688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008021513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020257249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6853528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164723744","doi":"10.25336/p6np5p","title":"Earning and caring: demographic change and policy implications","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Unpaid work; Private sphere; Division of labour; Work (physics); Fertility; Demographic economics; Paid work; Sociology; Public sphere; Interpersonal communication; Women's work; Social psychology; Labour economics; Psychology; Economics; Population; Political science; Demography; Working hours","score_opus":0.12992177835419227,"score_gpt":0.34403714160164156,"score_spread":0.2141153632474493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164723744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98858154,0.0041323644,0.0000031987674,0.0028511495,0.00010705277,0.0001666236,0.0000075503362,0.000016943633,0.004133595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952483,0.0040947087,0.000060272803,0.00030806806,0.00014643319,0.000022887427,0.000004098692,0.0000049791756,0.00011021022],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994573,0.000042218635,0.0000902847,0.00013122062,0.00005512986,0.00022383819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970543,0.000031102776,0.0000277731,0.00006270348,0.000037422444,0.0001355472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013381899,0.00005544594,0.00008214734,0.00029188095,0.0005851296,0.000024793168,0.00003811175,0.000053935575,0.0000024510332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016604057,0.00006383278,0.000009122429,0.00045285496,0.00014415967,0.00010863121,0.000015324744,0.000057730278,7.646681e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.981548e-8,0.0000013580193,0.9318989,0.000004812185,0.0000053963663,5.800837e-7,0.029657606,0.0000026346138,4.0461677e-7,0.03074933,0.000048341084,0.0076305554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058306123,0.0000042610513,0.9841848,0.00001027899,0.0000054027555,6.6206013e-7,0.010318945,0.0001718407,7.881153e-9,0.00300751,0.0021713008,0.000066690984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4582305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89573705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4375066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020464092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023609566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5453772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164987490","doi":"10.1017/s0008423908081134","title":"Gender and Elections: An Examination of the 2006 Canadian Federal Election","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Welfare economics; Flexibility (engineering); Demographic economics; Economics; Art; Management","score_opus":0.028132954178566167,"score_gpt":0.2743138883596084,"score_spread":0.24618093418104223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164987490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98322886,0.000059173977,0.000119711294,0.000718296,0.0004831098,0.00006664982,0.000009811052,0.000002547123,0.015311828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905217,0.000013759691,0.00012745523,0.00043606883,0.00017452358,4.9820375e-7,2.5975314e-7,0.000003529269,0.00019175766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984451,0.0001398876,0.00019331272,0.00011287678,0.0003841885,0.0007246252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738544,0.000034589953,0.00007436655,0.00008880389,0.0005312724,0.0018855175],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010692101,0.000060091388,0.000088292014,0.00031734613,0.0019893423,0.00008709199,0.00031659147,0.00006739176,0.000030933606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006911518,0.000049048147,0.00003363567,0.00081847905,0.0018071196,0.0004498123,0.0000056593626,0.00017056378,9.042144e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.9351374e-7,0.000013061894,0.22890905,0.0000027891867,0.0000047401627,0.000012260321,0.0085265655,0.000021088588,0.000295204,0.7612274,0.00022771621,0.0007592114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006265957,0.000045041517,0.9903105,0.0000050549193,0.000005723724,0.00009263761,0.005180913,0.00011722007,0.000052737778,0.0033638778,0.0007015796,0.00006206337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8205994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9597063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7614015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009960638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01395201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165371533","doi":"10.2202/2152-2812.1013","title":"An Assessment of Important Issues Concerning the Application of Benefit-Cost Analysis to Social Policy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Public economics; Valuation (finance); Public policy; Cost–benefit analysis; Shadow price; Shadow (psychology); Futures contract; Policy analysis; Public good; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Social Welfare; Microeconomics; Political science; Economic growth; Psychology; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.020642149177077563,"score_gpt":0.38167601618747543,"score_spread":0.36103386701039786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165371533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98584706,0.00015703768,0.010819781,0.0019426192,0.00014471565,0.00026768073,0.00018149875,0.000012842651,0.0006267766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957842,0.00043611202,0.0025517517,0.0001708838,0.0008974446,0.000012507868,0.000048363014,0.000017777926,0.000080926475],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961858,0.00017762854,0.001483253,0.00030859976,0.0014180711,0.00042665107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950537,0.00015122138,0.0023051966,0.00054188765,0.0016377864,0.00031019474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003044719,0.00023416737,0.0010701094,0.0014241275,0.0005869927,0.00013827856,0.0010680387,0.0002157087,0.00011091903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017546804,0.0001834467,0.0011031133,0.0067435387,0.00026245008,0.0003163393,0.00006340352,0.00043351128,0.0000014019598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037812883,0.00029859436,0.89918196,0.00000930289,0.0051711663,0.0000021802286,0.01619458,0.028718792,0.009997138,0.030240411,0.00004544605,0.010102602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000292924,0.0001026723,0.95649374,0.000006448903,0.0073187994,9.3193586e-7,0.01748511,0.014672842,0.00019464204,0.0014481526,0.0017412329,0.00024248965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0152527355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04925178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05731178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019619358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004719878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99130476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165583393","doi":"10.1093/aepp/ppt023","title":"While Mothers Work Do Children Shirk? Determinants of Youth Obesity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; McMaster University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Endogeneity; National Longitudinal Surveys; Instrumental variable; Allowance (engineering); Obesity; Psychology; Longitudinal study; Developmental psychology; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Economics; Medicine; Econometrics","score_opus":0.01235463840138428,"score_gpt":0.25211374102541034,"score_spread":0.23975910262402605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165583393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92098767,0.00015275029,0.0000064087367,0.00013034203,0.00004898194,0.0002972577,0.000047023863,0.000030777395,0.078298785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99846035,0.0006054977,0.00011303111,0.00009477739,0.00035681584,0.0000130831795,0.000002483769,0.000014253356,0.00033967846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913216,0.000028677223,0.00017376797,0.0002821228,0.00005962508,0.00032362717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995126,0.000033485292,0.00011239176,0.00018152002,0.000021031468,0.00013897195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015400499,0.00013295855,0.00023456718,0.00009077363,0.00024782986,0.00008009448,0.00020068263,0.000103666694,0.00013281786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009806327,0.00013470877,0.000056866862,0.00010935484,0.00037895536,0.00012662624,0.00005293307,0.00007895335,0.00006978142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001148308,0.00006444714,0.61943346,0.0000050454046,0.00005416551,8.170891e-8,0.23877181,0.000026493906,0.000017762984,0.13718142,0.0002660365,0.0041677593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026578858,0.000015454803,0.8393884,0.0000048723396,0.000012986418,3.1006223e-7,0.15321077,0.000014986875,0.000007955116,0.006819491,0.00008706657,0.00017192322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022626888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005763172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21995491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015979462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014779241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98388153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166117347","doi":"10.2511/rpsd.32.3.184","title":"Utilizing Natural Supports to Lower the Cost of Supported Employment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Per capita; Fiscal year; Natural experiment; Economics; Natural (archaeology); State (computer science); Business; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Geography; Finance; Demography; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.0907744983153648,"score_gpt":0.41798667962602226,"score_spread":0.32721218131065744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166117347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95990235,0.00024006296,0.00024828676,0.008035812,0.00020938163,0.0017021466,0.00012655417,0.000028580282,0.029506851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923652,0.0001048376,0.0009250407,0.00019479315,0.0001128985,0.00006513643,0.000015482057,0.000015438012,0.006201183],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975359,0.0003168296,0.0002020894,0.00028063983,0.0008777856,0.00078675046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905066,0.008175374,0.00006348296,0.00025769745,0.00074607355,0.00025077796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006196447,0.00011980374,0.00015925412,0.00009693119,0.0010487301,0.00014462988,0.0002366637,0.00007247594,0.0000829727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00464104,0.00008042986,0.000050907154,0.00045475241,0.0012610918,0.00041924728,0.00006648801,0.0002902527,0.0000034120858],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0075586913,0.0013491845,0.14611177,0.00036662453,0.0003740928,0.00003255611,0.7111713,0.000020562557,0.00036365647,0.10091475,0.022548685,0.009188103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027869348,0.00072515133,0.0076122354,0.000026655507,0.000023383518,0.000015875847,0.86934745,0.000014414623,0.000029061961,0.0004900752,0.1213057,0.00013128736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004203619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01204209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15817614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014085916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047738318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.806609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167946863","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1464719","title":"Share the Gain, Share the Pain? Almost Transferable Utility, Changes in Production Possibilities, and Bargaining Solutions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; HEC Montréal; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Transferable utility; Economics; Microeconomics; Business; Game theory","score_opus":0.02904525935664445,"score_gpt":0.2699468898077473,"score_spread":0.24090163045110283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167946863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.849014,0.025127765,0.0018949666,0.11305291,0.00054412184,0.0012342567,0.000043487562,0.000114028975,0.008974458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880579,0.009306057,0.000011384143,0.00079501455,0.00045864502,0.000010947817,0.0000075257494,0.000009155109,0.001343381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671865,0.00069596316,0.00021566644,0.00024181983,0.00034058446,0.0017873064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993896,0.00012922316,0.00006486892,0.00018210548,0.00016452107,0.000069669695],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0085244505,0.00013661203,0.00013579024,0.00006781115,0.0021866304,0.00017644648,0.0003587821,0.000093816314,0.000049521743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004926653,0.000089548965,0.000056219542,0.00042970854,0.00022907933,0.0002416889,0.000019322002,0.0013761558,0.000001928551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010972761,0.00035574933,0.04892005,0.000026569136,0.00016682145,0.0000074267564,0.23911785,0.00038941464,0.0003456052,0.55761504,0.0023660471,0.15057972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035374874,0.0003014805,0.03647402,0.0000589141,0.000034954188,0.000064597196,0.45151466,0.0011147064,0.0000051669576,0.50700253,0.0028351005,0.0002401308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091607275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1100775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21239682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005495633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015585837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168057108","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.273572","title":"The Control of Land Rent in the Fortified Farming Town","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Landlord; Administration (probate law); Agriculture; Control (management); Business; Economics; Agricultural economics; Natural resource economics; Geography","score_opus":0.037427667288459435,"score_gpt":0.2727580173698468,"score_spread":0.23533035008138736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168057108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9699684,0.000118646414,0.0009927497,0.002674488,0.00021799284,0.0024495039,0.00012159382,0.000010567023,0.023446055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957717,0.00038248702,0.00015521406,0.000042548738,0.000071046634,0.000008712675,0.000021978993,0.0000071765294,0.0035391538],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740475,0.0007726773,0.00029253596,0.00031610127,0.00078005454,0.00043390554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801445,0.0008008186,0.0003227394,0.00052443496,0.00027011288,0.00006746819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033461805,0.00015444952,0.00037418105,0.00014836156,0.00062627747,0.000060840586,0.0014462501,0.0002550403,0.00008655118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000099046185,0.00012559483,0.00021997314,0.00029210062,0.0008037162,0.000101374026,0.0003066206,0.00054428016,0.0000067237675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041577293,0.0006044684,0.67770153,0.00041003863,0.00038554004,0.00017921507,0.22707005,0.0036127677,0.00024620132,0.02660433,0.012108406,0.050661664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020273093,0.000108525244,0.7436955,0.000115579795,0.00010992106,0.0000012357906,0.19184975,0.004076509,0.000009222258,0.003501987,0.054095995,0.00040847732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057913505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13333128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07541778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120026976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042496296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9483599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169134223","doi":"","title":"Dynamic Intrahousehold Bargaining, Matrimonial Property Law and Suicide in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Demographic economics; Property (philosophy); Economics; Natural experiment; Survey data collection; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.009981693217579097,"score_gpt":0.23684252932452649,"score_spread":0.22686083610694738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169134223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9748409,0.0022929076,0.00029675264,0.00044419433,0.0003204905,0.0001704981,0.000004321045,0.000018998155,0.021610977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99421376,0.004076367,0.00011394964,0.00042978942,0.00006120883,0.00000313156,0.000001284931,0.000021317976,0.001079195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658716,0.00028264622,0.0002788059,0.00020757834,0.0003758321,0.0022679996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952585,0.000046520498,0.00009589626,0.00010293422,0.000056732886,0.00017208088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001947566,0.00014849054,0.00019523205,0.0000695252,0.0005001123,0.000089180176,0.00022917155,0.00009010495,0.00001766709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010532188,0.000118737575,0.000035423065,0.00025520998,0.00012311862,0.00018775988,0.000016827711,0.0012969412,0.0000022447095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020046318,0.00003959144,0.20265193,0.000004624725,0.000050478346,0.000035430177,0.0026139861,0.00014141986,0.00007112456,0.79101855,0.000059883234,0.0032929436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003966352,0.00052137824,0.04841215,0.000085602245,0.00009604701,0.0006200062,0.26481712,0.001341421,0.000020940653,0.64586854,0.032767408,0.0014830284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9258298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26220313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004240575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021348668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169279172","doi":"10.1111/1468-0335.00283","title":"Welfare Reform and Unemployment in New Zealand","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economica","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Economics; Welfare; Labour supply; Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Point (geometry); Unemployment rate; Economic welfare; Panel data; Demographic economics; Macroeconomics; Econometrics; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.023062938875955844,"score_gpt":0.2439609754411021,"score_spread":0.22089803656514626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169279172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89018553,0.00014465544,9.1997805e-7,0.008267225,0.00015948093,0.00008071185,0.0000038480794,0.000020917607,0.10113671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98053515,0.00060081005,0.00012013224,0.00022110679,0.00011544745,0.0000022922375,0.0000016429842,0.000005912116,0.018397506],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994915,0.000017654987,0.00011834458,0.00014194835,0.00003573914,0.00019481836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997618,0.000008739009,0.000028249979,0.00008866273,0.0000049989158,0.0001075334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000118526026,0.000056215613,0.000092724134,0.000038495447,0.00010928422,0.000042116026,0.000090439135,0.0000565671,0.0004371114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000076190263,0.000057318444,0.000016919974,0.000049596376,0.000050231847,0.00009454901,0.000022597877,0.00005495865,0.000068555506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104361225,0.00009355458,0.79092014,0.000008110986,0.000024619387,0.0000073603856,0.06564593,0.00004994278,0.000011135779,0.10153559,0.0153832305,0.026309941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005986326,0.00002907968,0.382243,0.000005565479,0.0000039775423,7.0088225e-7,0.008557411,0.00052004075,0.0000021023343,0.0030663556,0.604794,0.00017913293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011745837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02433703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5894108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021357708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031522875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169974677","doi":"10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00036.x","title":"Are Parents Investing Less Time in Children? Trends in Selected Industrialized Countries","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Population and Development Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":419,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Developed country; Multivariate analysis; Demography; Population; Demographic economics; Developing country; Consistency (knowledge bases); Investment (military); Geography; Economic growth; Political science; Medicine; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06124117440261633,"score_gpt":0.3197459815087538,"score_spread":0.25850480710613744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169974677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931282,0.0056080953,0.000012573002,0.00043693723,0.000057270932,0.00032466446,0.0000025588215,0.000038801394,0.00039094567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99018484,0.008111696,0.0006315897,0.00065772806,0.000029653736,0.000025794017,0.00019704601,0.000007877026,0.00015378956],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878097,0.00015228463,0.00042686632,0.00019035378,0.00023245734,0.00021706939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961233,0.000015252947,0.00019431773,0.00005608987,0.00005282845,0.00006917126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006426263,0.00011180766,0.00028055234,0.00016369493,0.00016361833,0.00004450664,0.000074429925,0.00008914147,0.000033522036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022376257,0.00010832255,0.0000135987375,0.0009886336,0.00003067486,0.00013421061,0.00002015656,0.00010191137,0.00000915441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017168588,0.000020427045,0.98722064,0.000044212156,0.000004194127,7.853624e-7,0.0015986919,0.000013369698,2.2382679e-7,0.0003852831,0.000034733137,0.010675735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006323647,0.0000022761267,0.9954508,0.0009691641,0.0000057778,6.32668e-7,0.00026850495,0.000005289363,3.7544777e-7,0.00013680653,0.0023865849,0.00014143708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00229521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073288656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010534298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021948939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019975708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44172654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170401282","doi":"10.1093/cesifo/ifu006","title":"Do the Perils of Universal Childcare Depend on the Child's Age?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CESifo Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Subsidy; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.030795484295905253,"score_gpt":0.27027236612150657,"score_spread":0.2394768818256013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170401282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8639102,0.0008839495,0.000006042479,0.0040375562,0.0007219974,0.0001869628,0.000016768563,0.00002193131,0.13021459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967529,0.0018581098,0.00001201175,0.00041441375,0.0004126485,0.000007623039,0.0000012021198,0.000008857706,0.000532215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991014,0.00019008893,0.00016247065,0.00020531114,0.00010816098,0.00023259751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896985,0.0005324076,0.000120524535,0.00029898586,0.000044511897,0.000033731954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071275106,0.00011905225,0.00021286114,0.00003116827,0.001001553,0.0000470643,0.0004665652,0.000047869817,0.000055749453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018191127,0.00007080693,0.000091808666,0.00006931071,0.0006122714,0.00005920968,0.00009381158,0.00011163606,0.00005515924],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019825595,0.000040416602,0.04645352,0.000018206654,0.0004487189,0.0000015356267,0.22817208,0.0007068195,0.0000064181363,0.7143186,0.0063847196,0.0034291388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005058767,0.00013060297,0.24048404,0.000052753774,0.000099195866,9.99326e-7,0.63225436,0.00015178868,0.000032011874,0.012827403,0.11310144,0.00035950606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047112574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038452211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7014912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111144145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053206946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77032375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170453899","doi":"","title":"Child Care Costs and Mothers' Labor Supply: An Empirical Analysis for Germany","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; German; Estimation; Economics; Labour supply; West germany; Child care; Sample (material); Labour economics; Demographic economics; Panel data; Econometrics; Medicine","score_opus":0.030310159174931576,"score_gpt":0.3634444658621476,"score_spread":0.33313430668721605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170453899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9603048,0.0005534375,0.000030004292,0.0009477316,0.00030616423,0.0013505701,0.0007859006,0.000059900056,0.03566151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831268,0.013930186,0.0009961406,0.0002629201,0.00041819882,0.00023200293,0.00032115963,0.000060592083,0.00065198366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965003,0.00045846365,0.0004890563,0.0011523903,0.00037800934,0.0010217595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978785,0.0003800445,0.00014767963,0.0008026124,0.00032844825,0.00046272803],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017824078,0.00031373932,0.0006760712,0.00073751877,0.00071194925,0.0003778234,0.00081052736,0.0007839286,0.000048993537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031590482,0.0003537892,0.0002742212,0.0004490981,0.0007126717,0.00014780692,0.00043314276,0.0010839704,0.0000025253883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009641414,0.00021955415,0.88671035,0.00019122646,0.00059484155,0.00001623042,0.059634205,0.017037462,0.00000511625,0.0032091516,0.000025907517,0.03225957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015224785,0.00020403697,0.8245726,0.00014069292,0.00022396079,0.0000016872335,0.1303691,0.0109334355,0.0000052905452,0.0042382763,0.026678976,0.0011094689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027997561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048159957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07073489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002296888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015651032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171133954","doi":"10.1177/002795010300100112","title":"Evaluation Using Random Assignment Experiments: Demonstrating the Effectiveness of Earnings Supplements","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Institute Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Earnings; Random assignment; Welfare; Payment; Work (physics); Economics; Public economics; Quality (philosophy); Labour economics; Actuarial science; Demographic economics; Accounting; Statistics; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.09711467474454152,"score_gpt":0.3971232903705754,"score_spread":0.30000861562603387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171133954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6260572,0.07604169,0.016595706,0.0005789588,0.0043045552,0.008361294,0.000078404926,0.000049588405,0.26793256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99311435,0.0056403372,0.00080839184,0.00019291647,0.00006618315,0.000121391735,0.00002691186,0.0000060640264,0.000023473982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972241,0.0015196248,0.00040334556,0.00017672296,0.00053280144,0.00014341013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990113,0.0003011362,0.00027735461,0.00009640297,0.00027714987,0.000036693342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014131972,0.00009360359,0.00021420895,0.000035241803,0.00037553662,0.000032403383,0.00015381575,0.000041821415,0.00025674084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001138701,0.00007826178,0.0001039435,0.000108684275,0.00014620136,0.00031747168,0.000014794392,0.00006797093,0.000013881561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033225882,0.00022325203,0.0334551,0.00086803926,0.00062409934,7.4611484e-7,0.0025921173,0.04176084,0.0009616544,0.910966,0.00069292163,0.007822031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016312715,0.00017818387,0.046802323,0.009184781,0.002039612,0.000021902059,0.00877493,0.039173305,0.0015750824,0.04342647,0.83050245,0.002008227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022074023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007721846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8675395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008635322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013475893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48978874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172109878","doi":"","title":"Charitable bequests and wealth at death in Great Britain","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; University of Oxford","keywords":"Probate; Bequest; Beneficiary; Quarter (Canadian coin); Population; Economics; Demographic economics; Actuarial science; Geography; Demography; Sociology; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.02677709464787655,"score_gpt":0.25084325655226974,"score_spread":0.22406616190439319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172109878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97231644,0.00016077702,0.00025132796,0.00024995647,0.00013602174,0.00020670134,0.000020007985,0.000037535716,0.026621226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99319804,0.00042052937,0.0008855646,0.000044096636,0.00004010898,3.2504093e-7,0.000007086953,0.00000729271,0.0053969524],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881905,0.00012516721,0.00010056136,0.00022814701,0.00024613136,0.00048092584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993803,0.00005050022,0.000085936306,0.00017513668,0.000054303986,0.00025385924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074892025,0.00010479628,0.00020414311,0.00012413875,0.00038428672,0.00001309714,0.00023085983,0.0001463732,0.00050847564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035193094,0.00013902482,0.000048568607,0.00021851869,0.0002773677,0.00036903823,0.00021031644,0.00013458129,0.000089630135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000130387425,0.000054311018,0.92668384,0.00001787514,0.000009039361,0.000004696165,0.061537564,0.000002213014,0.000041301726,0.011065138,0.000056505407,0.0005144981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047461412,0.000015026684,0.9450568,0.000024688894,0.0000115910325,0.0000014233682,0.048062466,0.00005260796,0.0000074692425,0.00094690017,0.005191259,0.00015516521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0234684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013126715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021224273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025079265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009249508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98303443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172144121","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-627x.2004.00119.x","title":"Further Evidence on the Role of Gender in Financial Performance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Small Business Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sample (material); Psychology; Control (management); Finance; Social psychology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.03605043225771286,"score_gpt":0.2532636495971501,"score_spread":0.21721321733943721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172144121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98775893,0.0003678767,0.00077070366,0.0018049662,0.00036356386,0.00016883972,4.7318346e-7,0.000004339842,0.008760285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965127,0.0023731687,0.0005643441,0.00028921122,0.00013510344,0.000003427435,1.0978456e-7,0.0000067062847,0.00011520839],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988295,0.000060382645,0.00033435898,0.00009364476,0.0004730935,0.0002090151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992459,0.00004779808,0.0002798037,0.00014265154,0.00024836065,0.000035474986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00112935,0.00008960137,0.00015226388,0.00015441151,0.00011019549,0.00003191099,0.00044438752,0.000045983812,0.00002480277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010410442,0.000062398496,0.000056858054,0.000584089,0.000101279904,0.00019687686,0.00005107013,0.00014486432,0.0000071400773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000564586,0.0014874343,0.36869496,0.00048341442,0.00019584705,0.00018431799,0.08756419,0.13002516,0.00047594777,0.32446405,0.0003105038,0.08554958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039531494,0.000047390386,0.9773958,0.00033821774,0.000026541858,0.0000014224682,0.009499849,0.000057180183,0.000030127094,0.009687598,0.0024243721,0.0000961915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024278846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039063307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6087008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015114257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017656878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25445366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172493141","doi":"10.1257/pol.5.1.179","title":"Public Transfers and Domestic Violence: The Roles of Private Information and Spousal Control","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Economic Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":316,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Economic rent; Domestic violence; Control (management); Poison control; Demographic economics; Medicine; Injury prevention; Environmental health; Psychology; Business; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.008034727721411937,"score_gpt":0.2453025236658316,"score_spread":0.23726779594441966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172493141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881829,0.00011294705,0.000280449,0.00797138,0.00015608704,0.00023317276,0.000044666067,0.000013686802,0.0030047072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99146336,0.0069581494,0.0000800499,0.0011732253,0.00028795967,0.000010482579,0.0000013486144,0.00000918458,0.000016223572],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987982,0.00012790748,0.00050780777,0.000120022676,0.00005402861,0.00039204286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998944,0.00019185712,0.00043671037,0.00012808356,0.00003370582,0.0002656324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065543,0.00013603753,0.00030456073,0.00020710143,0.00035975655,0.00033260768,0.00029162815,0.00004831841,0.000049351493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075460775,0.00011305771,0.00006336944,0.00006159054,0.0013124387,0.0011626707,0.000027175964,0.00017141075,0.000045415196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040094124,0.000026644311,0.25697768,0.000016957321,0.00029006967,7.4340034e-7,0.026271906,0.001089556,0.000055636647,0.22016467,0.00043773145,0.49462834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032163542,0.00046640084,0.8112587,0.000041591527,0.000096639706,0.00019318641,0.091836445,0.012515035,0.0000067309866,0.06323481,0.016401518,0.0007326373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010000024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012296576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.554281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003080554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078973814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99659246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178978920","doi":"10.25336/p67s4m","title":"Economics of the Family","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.10287602898497311,"score_gpt":0.32617350362795855,"score_spread":0.22329747464298544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178978920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764848,0.00058619777,0.0000021885253,0.0004236067,0.0012792445,0.00011123338,0.000010318349,0.0000046367,0.021097777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999187,0.00018414238,0.000052827512,0.00023132635,0.000075474796,0.0000033231154,0.0000027997353,0.0000034929371,0.00025960896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950457,0.00006126286,0.00013516124,0.00007424598,0.000071576134,0.00015316141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965876,0.0000214134,0.00004935242,0.000102787635,0.000082631894,0.00008506728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033587622,0.000040973206,0.00008755044,0.00006265144,0.00014082744,0.000006713948,0.000117118754,0.000046218138,0.0000010166261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002433237,0.000036152538,0.000020096224,0.00019895716,0.00013925662,0.00006145853,0.000016310662,0.0000405043,0.0000020403925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.1265447e-7,0.0000023420523,0.9257241,0.000002608939,0.00000743912,3.1204834e-7,0.023680162,0.00072591816,3.0554122e-7,0.04796131,0.0011564228,0.00073838636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009959283,0.000004259411,0.9035851,0.000008419038,0.0000047634207,7.587163e-8,0.07121865,0.0001450164,2.0300318e-7,0.014250714,0.010627043,0.000056191842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50496423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9594672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45450294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007104106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037495335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49833223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179593737","doi":"10.1111/caje.12134","title":"Did Canadian welfare reform work? The effects of new reform strategies on social assistance participation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Sanctions; Demographics; Welfare; Economics; Welfare reform; Point (geometry); Social assistance; Social Welfare; Public economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Political science; Market economy; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.1310613180748482,"score_gpt":0.23761641117689097,"score_spread":0.10655509310204278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179593737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654501,0.00020329253,0.000011783231,0.01085978,0.002377349,0.00028537822,0.00007736133,0.0000063751772,0.020728584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973765,0.0000881821,0.000068694724,0.00060870935,0.0010079142,0.000010703836,0.000011744209,0.000034126304,0.0007934487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979214,0.00014119997,0.0006994309,0.0002441221,0.0000150370415,0.0009788122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955266,0.000076027296,0.00065205304,0.00030391838,0.00036425813,0.0030771315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011274943,0.00024337783,0.00048356687,0.00042721408,0.00070828624,0.00022556348,0.0007590754,0.00027692728,0.00004783603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003347028,0.00023153293,0.00018597023,0.00028966746,0.0003620446,0.00054116634,0.000011058745,0.000400102,0.00000844405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006457618,0.000011156634,0.007222543,0.000029244613,0.00011836184,0.0000602615,0.03712906,0.0011565565,0.0000011552262,0.9474381,0.0017196914,0.0050492687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028836082,0.0012815258,0.27612382,0.0003925549,0.00026262266,0.00004698276,0.22858678,0.00028823147,0.000044465043,0.24024309,0.24828364,0.0015626672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9736418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70719504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012822852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017383143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99096674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181210956","doi":"10.25336/p68c89","title":"The early life courses of Canadian men: analysis of timing and sequences of events","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cohabitation; Life course approach; Demography; Early adulthood; Work (physics); Transition (genetics); Family life; Event (particle physics); Psychology; Demographic economics; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Young adult; Geography; Gender studies; Economics","score_opus":0.08575346622552465,"score_gpt":0.3269811195128692,"score_spread":0.24122765328734452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181210956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937346,0.0026084986,9.3205244e-7,0.00040307816,0.00010890658,0.00009264408,0.000050209706,0.0000016813788,0.0029994233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979463,0.0018663532,0.000036331654,0.000027200676,0.000014481327,0.0000026446799,0.0000041023427,0.000002616168,0.00009995734],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922997,0.00008260832,0.00024554125,0.00008823286,0.00016090806,0.00019272006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940723,0.0001009615,0.0001282877,0.000087193344,0.00013942119,0.0001368832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036068383,0.000052765903,0.00019812428,0.0005932656,0.0002743379,0.00000584743,0.00009781607,0.000047458332,0.000008648136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028836014,0.000046905825,0.00003249583,0.0011919523,0.00027443864,0.00006349626,0.000007245635,0.000034178713,1.6554675e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.948778e-7,0.0000024325282,0.9677595,0.000007357993,0.00015091064,5.403626e-7,0.027010161,0.00040321646,0.0000024374115,0.003865609,0.00010551198,0.00069171825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004701521,0.000010019893,0.9514859,0.000016598216,0.00010285405,2.9741477e-8,0.046836227,0.00090370653,7.3513365e-7,0.00035767685,0.0001918438,0.000047390713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97837704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99882615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020449102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019540034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016387913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21100129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2186356524","doi":"","title":"Cheap Maids and Nannies: How Low-skilled immigration is changing the labor supply of high-skilled American women","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Housekeeping; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Graduate degree; Economics; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.005599419132848035,"score_gpt":0.24503742422165412,"score_spread":0.23943800508880608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2186356524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99088395,0.000080264996,0.0012324112,0.004474611,0.00022210642,0.000292378,0.00002189717,0.000056682737,0.002735722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911315,0.00048520407,0.00083450385,0.001111985,0.00015819205,0.000016545499,0.000007105178,0.000013665894,0.006241321],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985032,0.000098506905,0.00020602049,0.00022900237,0.00039078796,0.00057247054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912107,0.00022148155,0.00014995955,0.00020349938,0.00017777745,0.00012621419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013262365,0.00014088335,0.00025614447,0.00015033738,0.00046252273,0.000085502485,0.00021719866,0.00007939707,0.00009713471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010615895,0.000099957484,0.000049004135,0.0010520456,0.00052168354,0.00016299238,0.000050965667,0.00009520436,0.0000040490286],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007833328,0.00013692208,0.13066141,0.000038476843,0.00012484044,0.0000036631686,0.7806794,0.0000076252854,0.0019892233,0.07640352,0.0010290757,0.008847504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005191834,0.00012859316,0.18618372,0.000013893141,0.000019485396,5.498895e-7,0.80756384,0.00021435319,0.00042495836,0.0012708304,0.0034342736,0.00022633988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005060104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047279787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07513269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010498575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000087744964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7649398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2186954426","doi":"10.25336/p6ck55","title":"Renewing the Family: A History of Baby Boomers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Baby boomers; Sociology; Political science; Geography; Demographic economics; Demography; History; Economics","score_opus":0.12838393909875323,"score_gpt":0.32596035177760574,"score_spread":0.1975764126788525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2186954426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9136928,0.010961451,0.0000126882815,0.0006251472,0.0031072535,0.00020421112,0.0000072511775,0.000016491978,0.0713727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979956,0.00025820947,0.000066992165,0.00033658821,0.000098711076,0.000007132455,0.0000055222213,0.000005382698,0.0012258289],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992269,0.00011471589,0.00016119145,0.00010038531,0.0001840307,0.00021273934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995524,0.000045757515,0.00005987164,0.0001138824,0.000113799346,0.00011427529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006557143,0.00005639883,0.00011498499,0.00012070869,0.00013206716,0.0000049247433,0.00011881836,0.00005204967,0.0000025218374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039530583,0.000050253377,0.000023232798,0.00023309216,0.0002294219,0.00008113949,0.000013838895,0.000060577822,0.0000021655549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033768874,0.0000059397134,0.6838018,0.000010796243,0.000028837765,0.0000045142992,0.2582501,0.00054037507,0.0000040353443,0.022220623,0.03260554,0.0025241228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002082502,0.000014747795,0.5088922,0.000029177962,0.000017860966,2.1210512e-7,0.3178128,0.0002551384,1.0115922e-7,0.0053947545,0.167235,0.00013978008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6771618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91282225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23566042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031333421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072518014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81935805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187435965","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of Gender Gaps in India","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"India Policy Forum","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Percentile; Workforce; Wage; Gender gap; Demographic economics; Economics; Convergence (economics); Labour economics; Economic growth; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.013793867861816578,"score_gpt":0.29002944151126353,"score_spread":0.27623557364944695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187435965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7983142,0.00024806135,0.00024635115,0.0019308296,0.0005041258,0.00024267992,0.000019501063,0.00003720485,0.198457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860305,0.00012681182,0.000051630253,0.00037835652,0.00027942978,0.000010826839,0.0000026919133,0.000009581675,0.00053762394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861634,0.00019864946,0.00021824213,0.00013225128,0.00029152582,0.0005429686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993774,0.00016958392,0.00010652648,0.00021191522,0.000053188753,0.000081329985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083024974,0.00008436727,0.00011738173,0.00017541135,0.00037158933,0.00003411566,0.00033968815,0.00014105515,0.0000073936203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038671738,0.00006862152,0.00005867217,0.0006109084,0.000289576,0.00009953988,0.00005149381,0.0001328342,0.000028214385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033726021,0.000018678282,0.31904966,0.000004233749,0.0000060418156,2.5403708e-7,0.012459029,0.000011839172,0.000031536594,0.6666861,0.00064746453,0.0010817758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022121803,0.000023245802,0.85743326,0.0000060212064,0.0000038003664,3.723936e-7,0.023939831,0.00009457842,0.00001001298,0.090169385,0.027999386,0.00009888433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014893769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007710787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57651675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003081263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052279246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99166614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190400701","doi":"10.25071/1927-9833.39577","title":"Introduction to the Inaugural issue","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Family Research and Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Library science; Work (physics); Political science; Editorial board; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.1187716692443917,"score_gpt":0.47274762793395175,"score_spread":0.35397595868956006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190400701","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4679441,0.0004835848,0.0012916501,0.49331102,0.006550937,0.0005138219,0.00006775219,0.000028301534,0.029808851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89122415,0.0014089213,0.0006720677,0.0035616106,0.06295198,0.000040620813,0.000015095616,0.00001839267,0.040107142],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802256,0.00020710008,0.00016364595,0.00014179206,0.0010487782,0.00041613006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973177,0.00016152347,0.000038882557,0.00009593485,0.0019580468,0.00042793716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003202173,0.00006674748,0.00007442559,0.00035164988,0.00076104334,0.00055074866,0.00059425796,0.000054923727,0.000015559877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021016921,0.000048163092,0.000041044514,0.00036964923,0.00022264385,0.00024014914,0.000099087614,0.000308345,0.000087914625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017534835,0.00004546712,0.0019923877,0.000001924088,0.000049164213,0.0000050738563,0.020295164,0.00005637257,0.0001426661,0.1387996,0.81590927,0.022527566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030057193,0.00018201298,0.0049639908,0.0000053877875,0.0000018130224,0.000019519908,0.022473251,0.00005913777,0.0000072285284,0.034494754,0.9374355,0.000056852066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038330732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084124174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4897494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035100087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008289174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5853407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195533542","doi":"10.7202/010006ar","title":"Travail des femmes et fécondité dans les pays en développement : que nous a appris l’Enquête mondiale de la fécondité?","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014932546442193764,"score_gpt":0.26750834914933674,"score_spread":0.25257580270714297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195533542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9358626,0.029631613,0.012328642,0.0034850028,0.0010755062,0.00079907273,0.0003344489,0.00031651976,0.016166603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8955919,0.09070602,0.007063301,0.0017715556,0.0005325075,0.0002088793,0.00008015861,0.00015574755,0.0038898864],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934944,0.0017027416,0.00083314575,0.0010339738,0.00077821995,0.0021575468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696743,0.00072037353,0.00038146137,0.00068410294,0.00020770017,0.0010389324],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026250638,0.0008745163,0.0007838262,0.00066513754,0.0017198158,0.00035713546,0.0011783938,0.001578155,0.000090967515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003458569,0.0009810559,0.00077857624,0.0024854182,0.008213953,0.000452442,0.00011232127,0.0014064768,0.00005240571],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004710251,0.0008809755,0.31718752,0.0002638768,0.00065753673,0.00056125846,0.5253657,0.0020644867,0.0019061395,0.12824915,0.00205919,0.020757036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029661953,0.0005001578,0.46938467,0.00033327602,0.0007991004,0.00022052735,0.35485655,0.000112380476,0.00047387928,0.06527507,0.10297907,0.0020991298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1770483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4112407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2341924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00249619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002699573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198766346","doi":"10.1080/07078552.2004.11827140","title":"Can We Afford to Pay for Social Programs?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Political Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public economics; Economics; Business; Labour economics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.0728101177344135,"score_gpt":0.3725300388927565,"score_spread":0.299719921158343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198766346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26312786,0.00033923553,0.0015042084,0.31048587,0.0026009027,0.0030134735,0.00012704711,0.00023973802,0.41856167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940743,0.000031818425,0.001412898,0.0028287016,0.0008102659,0.00030177284,0.0000038924145,0.000012121936,0.00052427256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846935,0.000033601053,0.00023396095,0.00025173055,0.00008651715,0.0009248587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994625,0.00011761771,0.000026243964,0.00008518999,0.00010536251,0.00020312864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029288515,0.00012164906,0.00025994002,0.00005751438,0.00044908922,0.000042869844,0.00018313601,0.00008838247,0.000005647915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018784172,0.000106164865,0.00008515174,0.00015865729,0.00051992544,0.000065591834,0.000075523974,0.00009524204,0.000014889348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000511779,0.000056415553,0.004366332,0.000027083186,0.000024857613,0.0000019648685,0.026235608,0.0000028198472,1.5072608e-7,0.9675576,0.00030591324,0.0014161149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044370032,0.00009288281,0.0011818842,0.000015315265,0.000011323527,2.4861814e-7,0.13310772,0.0000025329964,0.0000023973519,0.7628722,0.102093056,0.00017670376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009206447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0125530185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73094636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007539918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003151084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70048785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200018099","doi":"","title":"Connecting the Dots: The Early Impacts of Increased Paid Maternity Leave on Child Development","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Maternity leave; Parental leave; Observational study; Demographic economics; Psychology; Child care; Developmental psychology; Paternal care; Child development; Medicine; Nursing; Economics; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.026512033979862713,"score_gpt":0.2670176172937703,"score_spread":0.24050558331390762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200018099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94189614,0.00070767896,0.00003988304,0.000689583,0.0034711973,0.0010561084,0.00021416396,0.00015345664,0.05177178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978907,0.00016880289,0.00023403167,0.00055175106,0.0007097013,0.00006716813,0.000035348123,0.000053943255,0.0002885619],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956594,0.0010688828,0.0009191106,0.00070408743,0.0008299262,0.00081855926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961736,0.00090404076,0.0010738593,0.0010415274,0.00043865095,0.0003683246],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047919764,0.0005638021,0.00074171915,0.0001839621,0.0015659037,0.00031140205,0.0015534182,0.00059192564,0.00025389792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011207559,0.00039152967,0.00029872145,0.00023669572,0.0009795433,0.0001513524,0.0006045435,0.0013891057,0.00017395947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048555165,0.00013769111,0.9322852,0.000084118976,0.00031271583,0.000008362627,0.061893273,0.00012691261,0.000008663725,0.0031914643,0.0015069555,0.00039607656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010019125,0.00011976455,0.9302698,0.000711611,0.0001725302,0.000019870178,0.04749135,0.000105089035,0.00020557523,0.0022020037,0.016566109,0.0011344311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010723843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014016644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05599454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009643114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031394062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202838156","doi":"10.25336/p69316","title":"Family Change and Implications for Family Solidarity and Social Cohesion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohesion (chemistry); Solidarity; Social psychology; Sociology; Diversity (politics); Psychology; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.18714429588642537,"score_gpt":0.36308578875053865,"score_spread":0.17594149286411329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202838156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945663,0.0019088282,0.000039283077,0.0017632664,0.0002522088,0.00047130528,0.00008652439,0.000018996036,0.00089324516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99667346,0.0019960797,0.0002026582,0.00072725787,0.00020702052,0.000087772045,0.000039214516,0.0000075220896,0.00005898622],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992817,0.000047074995,0.00013989685,0.00018571582,0.00007405585,0.00027153362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996299,0.000060790517,0.000042981184,0.00005839127,0.00010605604,0.00010186825],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022400555,0.000080454025,0.00014632147,0.00012392458,0.001548876,0.000017873475,0.000050766022,0.00010192052,3.4296937e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008615339,0.00009164639,0.00001854178,0.00017088237,0.0002712066,0.00013856615,0.00001783594,0.000053912576,4.3022578e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027066096,0.0000062190365,0.9263389,0.000018369003,0.000010165908,9.0549025e-7,0.040234625,8.0250044e-7,0.0000140690245,0.027566299,0.0009877253,0.0048192106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017613795,0.000011138419,0.9750163,0.000006112354,0.0000092080445,5.3351243e-7,0.014845315,0.000054538963,5.7554917e-8,0.0057704747,0.004008951,0.000101259895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18861619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.681419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49280283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031411796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011132595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204990715","doi":"","title":"Adjust Me if I Can’t: The Effect of Firm Incentives on Labor Supply Responses to Taxes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Universitas Pasundan institutional repositories & scientific journals (Universitas Pasundan)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung; Washington Center for Equitable Growth","keywords":"Payroll tax; Economics; Labour economics; Incentive; Payroll; Labor demand; Payment; Empirical evidence; Income tax; Wage; Microeconomics; Public economics","score_opus":0.022403352599262842,"score_gpt":0.2767735549199262,"score_spread":0.2543702023206634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2204990715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9657607,0.0006852124,0.00041000152,0.0039270334,0.0068277675,0.0007037056,0.0008447212,0.000105803265,0.020735059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899593,0.000088708264,0.00037182498,0.00013860835,0.00046843788,0.0000040066316,0.000055687524,0.000022904673,0.008890548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99405867,0.0011051733,0.00048758532,0.00078586844,0.0026530328,0.0009096502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954505,0.0005838238,0.0004947207,0.0007163441,0.0018001207,0.0009544819],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028029094,0.00044191757,0.0005299009,0.0010088048,0.0065859146,0.0007699694,0.001684494,0.00024425503,0.00024591608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012348205,0.00038303132,0.00033266965,0.0030862838,0.0034780952,0.0014164149,0.0004068834,0.00053482124,0.000080406644],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036870397,0.00050900684,0.28469837,0.000092509596,0.0007801073,0.0009824286,0.18307956,0.0077632857,0.0042568822,0.39110693,0.122078866,0.0009650229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029030032,0.0017201061,0.08940504,0.00051363074,0.0006663063,0.00009434835,0.5362115,0.00011779812,0.0012958572,0.0018846963,0.36405495,0.0011327344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002378678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015058347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38922223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020116295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030040334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206572531","doi":"10.25916/sut.26261717","title":"The Ivy Compton-Burnett School of Sociology: family culture and everyday life","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Everyday life; Sociology; Gender studies; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02907969790265764,"score_gpt":0.301804358901103,"score_spread":0.2727246609984454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206572531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9635255,0.0071860086,0.000407875,0.009004757,0.0001738336,0.00068834797,0.00003819771,0.00019526236,0.018780254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98119587,0.013791546,0.0014108174,0.00007762479,0.00008394024,0.0000020002149,0.00000745252,0.000018707884,0.0034120204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653816,0.00039884873,0.00037625417,0.00056894537,0.0010225266,0.0010952916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970831,0.00035653202,0.00024566034,0.00073135167,0.0012031945,0.00038012388],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002769887,0.0002530405,0.0005383891,0.0007461528,0.0022176937,0.000045925917,0.0018852189,0.0008863466,0.00008588374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015276998,0.00022900589,0.0001842398,0.001822934,0.010613981,0.00028979479,0.0007414132,0.0015214937,0.00003568944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005410934,0.00091487425,0.25152278,0.00019863369,0.0011456455,0.00017240344,0.058773994,0.00024585106,0.015986148,0.6172643,0.047033202,0.0062011243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004220388,0.00094847847,0.114773296,0.00023888133,0.00012101376,0.000008796889,0.51061183,0.00006960442,0.00045246293,0.17381737,0.19406109,0.0006767872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039008171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013459866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45183784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043086117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016592693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2207034128","doi":"10.1080/02255189.2016.1122580","title":"Determinants of labour market gender inequalities in Cameroon, Senegal and Mali: the role of human capital and fertility burden","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Française de Développement; David and Lucile Packard Foundation","keywords":"Fertility; Human capital; Inequality; Economics; Gender inequality; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Geography; Population; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.04365641339692507,"score_gpt":0.2622304246504898,"score_spread":0.21857401125356474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2207034128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99586105,0.0020011263,0.00000402141,0.0012820616,0.0002514064,0.0002386442,0.000056770325,0.000002525365,0.00030238638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99839264,0.0009792603,0.0002842689,0.000068931324,0.00006513051,0.000011301182,8.209645e-7,0.000014076467,0.00018357429],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776626,0.00022246376,0.0009341272,0.00022905249,0.00019617454,0.00065192435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805975,0.00017622965,0.00046112048,0.000151373,0.00062594283,0.000525583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021141332,0.0002222136,0.00054400956,0.0003176104,0.00046065435,0.000028077633,0.0003401926,0.00008384774,0.00004801505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038980404,0.00016224982,0.000048574184,0.00024095105,0.0006758281,0.00014881784,0.000085370135,0.000119870405,2.377727e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014758771,0.000013390492,0.8138569,0.00010163166,0.00015637957,0.000036688645,0.17493655,0.000001256921,0.000087427536,0.007278756,0.000043433763,0.0034728625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004824727,0.000066048226,0.79582894,0.00020974423,0.000026516393,0.000011340118,0.19822444,0.0000016518004,0.00006374982,0.0027281588,0.0021769025,0.00018001668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059843823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93122345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8713797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010988886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002233762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94641674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210106209","doi":"10.1111/caje.12322","title":"Intra‐household allocation of parental leave","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Demographic economics; Consumption (sociology); Distribution (mathematics); Duration (music); Parental leave; Human capital; Time allocation; Pareto principle; Labour economics; Economic growth; Operations management","score_opus":0.11668821550162653,"score_gpt":0.2107560446925557,"score_spread":0.09406782919092918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210106209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98957914,0.000113303526,0.000110683635,0.0011526275,0.002425371,0.00016613118,0.00012248883,0.000006369638,0.0063239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970573,0.00019660183,0.00036318824,0.00044402247,0.0015126836,0.0000032539638,0.00000955775,0.000031545755,0.00038185474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982722,0.00009316648,0.00074005657,0.00022679483,0.000005574939,0.00066225603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971514,0.00008590284,0.00062533875,0.00026830492,0.0003875057,0.0014815861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091037265,0.00017537846,0.00041203445,0.00047976853,0.0003217629,0.00008707002,0.0006040924,0.00021248934,0.00020051362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022644026,0.00022235018,0.0001616389,0.00016957446,0.0007058789,0.00039933567,0.0000128796455,0.00022195186,0.000013275758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040394527,0.000023350885,0.11544299,0.000023836063,0.0001569518,0.000034570163,0.02842814,0.0014226,0.000063325635,0.8497907,0.0018316957,0.0027414479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036436245,0.002669764,0.13627248,0.00046805383,0.00035618263,0.0004414857,0.11623518,0.00412558,0.0010085161,0.49945524,0.23273265,0.0025912493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41521552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58110154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018659286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049780584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9067177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212939246","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1638133","title":"Child Support Guidelines and Divorce Rates","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Child support; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014215412013455714,"score_gpt":0.2994337550064609,"score_spread":0.2852183429930052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212939246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97035974,0.0015089698,0.00091317185,0.0073317126,0.00103632,0.000106957465,0.0000031639345,0.000051913845,0.01868804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815193,0.010373077,0.000254529,0.0005008598,0.0012272653,0.0000017271805,0.0000021265691,0.000015295045,0.006105848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975579,0.0000674615,0.00024382521,0.00016646126,0.00029835905,0.0016660156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993728,0.00002938651,0.000105973864,0.00011188427,0.00021528038,0.00016467851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026247683,0.00011864553,0.00013465155,0.000067910674,0.00095067394,0.00014170697,0.0002827565,0.00012452206,0.00008226878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026158668,0.00010266147,0.000062116465,0.0001576754,0.00019065102,0.00021648896,0.000032496453,0.0015807002,0.000019966777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001087108,0.000050928782,0.116853885,0.0000035124754,0.00008755104,0.000005670022,0.0042385324,0.0000074421655,0.00055574364,0.858814,0.0015463466,0.017825503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013744687,0.00036428153,0.05975057,0.000021222275,0.000104058825,0.0007585914,0.07432631,0.00023229717,0.000034774424,0.6580299,0.20421697,0.0007865205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063756545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03157747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20267063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115001356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001963332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9860937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220239759","doi":"","title":"A Cournot-Nash Model of Family Decision Making","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Economics; Cournot competition; Interdependence; Bargaining power; Microeconomics; Bargaining problem","score_opus":0.0797432021117367,"score_gpt":0.3799196726919274,"score_spread":0.3001764705801907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220239759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72610176,0.0002144879,0.0005632225,0.00009662242,0.00054859754,0.00062266324,0.00009160259,0.00003955375,0.2717215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.948496,0.042758428,0.0063871564,0.000101938596,0.00025271627,0.00006738202,0.000018439936,0.00006271019,0.0018552582],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957909,0.00041996926,0.0009276278,0.0009157071,0.0008266703,0.0011191275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970794,0.00095062196,0.00032703637,0.0010041429,0.00040044016,0.00023839288],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004740766,0.00030887855,0.0006867876,0.0006824518,0.0003974623,0.00018740991,0.0014734193,0.0008774919,0.00004666912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009522815,0.0003589683,0.00026712942,0.0003157029,0.0007650887,0.00014057635,0.0011679156,0.001667779,0.000008508317],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021628561,0.00040914715,0.059581563,0.00020583229,0.00013344974,0.000043807322,0.017944517,0.5209269,0.000180136,0.011846812,0.00026753475,0.388244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013808057,0.00012054702,0.033404253,0.0013906698,0.00003805379,0.000003300489,0.05176115,0.7401062,0.00000821092,0.15859687,0.011760266,0.0014296626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084123935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004759211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38681436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015194664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002787309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2221318249","doi":"","title":"One Hundred Years of Women's Wage-fixing","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Demographic economics; Economics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.12307656593693327,"score_gpt":0.3027705284123593,"score_spread":0.17969396247542602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2221318249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98648804,0.0000064704845,0.000085341664,0.00022411063,0.00011131316,0.00009926578,0.000023922323,0.000030637744,0.012930869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98487043,0.00007782013,0.0014622539,0.000022679873,0.00004248617,7.092922e-8,0.0000055116448,0.000006506662,0.013512243],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890614,0.00006570814,0.000113145936,0.00018035831,0.00035538265,0.00037928417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943805,0.000038321516,0.000095178744,0.00018896832,0.00009288998,0.0001466093],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028312145,0.00006473319,0.00022025763,0.00009944921,0.00015635682,0.000010742697,0.00034500618,0.0001331796,0.003562596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016636193,0.00011997078,0.00008660415,0.00047256227,0.00037841906,0.00022532947,0.00003422121,0.00011208512,0.00011799918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043133151,0.0013783461,0.06130878,0.00019220379,0.00058608357,0.00018061986,0.47458163,0.0010487927,0.017901938,0.028059274,0.0035316262,0.41079935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011439393,0.0001546003,0.86872715,0.000044297994,0.000056406356,0.0000010531361,0.104595065,0.000043179527,0.000049720038,0.0010031288,0.023875581,0.00030586025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014408115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023814219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8074184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016116464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011037026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222013878","doi":"","title":"Time, Money and Inequality in International Perspective","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Inequality; Distribution (mathematics); Demographic economics; Economic inequality; Income distribution; German; Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Labour economics; Geography","score_opus":0.025107455387868356,"score_gpt":0.2887853443340255,"score_spread":0.2636778889461571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222013878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79857796,0.0011167311,0.00005842612,0.0010107653,0.0029834385,0.00043538926,0.00032026117,0.00011339168,0.19538365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98926306,0.0016223142,0.0007841025,0.00031810868,0.00077855494,0.000057952784,0.00004380771,0.000034979847,0.0070971404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707454,0.00041557456,0.0006052971,0.0009295325,0.00045095338,0.000524094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983575,0.00028206932,0.00035977343,0.00043398686,0.00030051655,0.00026620043],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011721997,0.0003885039,0.00060096843,0.0004105812,0.00028075767,0.00019863692,0.0006575802,0.00067027373,0.001842592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005668598,0.00046359797,0.00017904268,0.0001936204,0.0011332746,0.0002596907,0.00048138804,0.0009632647,0.00022596403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011745957,0.00015888372,0.94178265,0.000025203466,0.00011020304,0.000024285982,0.03813152,0.00009007719,0.000007467169,0.017395291,0.0020499236,0.00021276622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013973458,0.000049467988,0.8935838,0.00020905088,0.00007312586,0.000015431997,0.059579674,0.0050544883,0.0000035594626,0.0235122,0.014956824,0.001565036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070786155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073801065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1906851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015656238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007634313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225541930","doi":"","title":"The Power of the Purse: New Evidence on the Distribution of Income and Expenditures within the Family from a Canadian Experiment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distribution (mathematics); Household income; Demographic economics; Economics; Scale (ratio); Family income; Labour economics; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.019086281119150582,"score_gpt":0.2494564174323337,"score_spread":0.23037013631318312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225541930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847554,0.005927525,0.0000670321,0.0038209269,0.0011876205,0.0008804944,0.0013726252,0.0000128197635,0.0019755652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99498254,0.003880191,0.000020933558,0.00007090256,0.00009609624,0.0000021143285,0.00009199004,0.000008694322,0.0008465623],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973626,0.00072321045,0.00040435704,0.00053435215,0.0007019827,0.00027345444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959943,0.0009228162,0.00093043887,0.0018028562,0.00015395887,0.00019557311],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009173427,0.00025509534,0.00036863555,0.000039881317,0.0017173213,0.0001306035,0.002191011,0.0002252406,0.000010543222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002704349,0.00014684728,0.00010014142,0.00009330315,0.0016090212,0.00019150923,0.0012338359,0.0003752358,6.642411e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019622543,0.0006880682,0.36601058,0.00041345495,0.0053511043,0.00018913644,0.11500568,0.001247011,0.0022753465,0.15645072,0.34161234,0.008794328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012091213,0.00020709344,0.7678541,0.0014591954,0.0009564692,0.0000068901013,0.10659361,0.00038475124,0.0003397755,0.005691529,0.11456582,0.00073167495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7791346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53412586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4018435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000338594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092680583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228347071","doi":"","title":"The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values/Earning and Caring in Canadian Families/Women's Caring: Feminist Perspectives on Social Welfare (Book)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Population Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Sociology; Social Welfare; Gender studies; Economics; Psychology; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.047400161821393366,"score_gpt":0.3005209581892919,"score_spread":0.2531207963678985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228347071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98364484,0.0041153776,2.9361664e-7,0.0028602052,0.00019073364,0.00018776124,0.000008500237,0.000025323776,0.0089669535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99073774,0.008456169,0.000025106283,0.0002628209,0.00012373998,0.000027692107,0.0000015594625,0.000011625849,0.00035355787],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988673,0.00011391078,0.0001882254,0.00026916093,0.00012902045,0.00043238717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995622,0.00012699646,0.00006418395,0.0000798421,0.000056843513,0.00010990671],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047952373,0.00012994237,0.00020568779,0.00013351494,0.0030788889,0.00015669892,0.00007334744,0.00007387476,0.0000024591927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017517124,0.00012155423,0.000024868226,0.00016279996,0.00029420268,0.00013132681,0.000051605337,0.00014404941,0.000001647104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039587844,0.0000079696865,0.615711,0.000007750893,0.000034659464,0.0000010090421,0.32028463,0.00021419901,8.6750634e-7,0.061547227,0.0001077901,0.0020789749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117904405,0.000013208539,0.53674877,0.000005493313,0.000005176643,2.1432439e-7,0.44693595,0.00043339937,4.9948575e-8,0.00052140397,0.015119619,0.00009881042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11738656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4045944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2872078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006739099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004043143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99821895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232655883","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2010.01600.x","title":"Love and taxes – and matching institutions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Redistribution of income and wealth; Economics; Matching (statistics); Labour economics; Passive income; Demographic economics; Gross income; Microeconomics; Public economics; State income tax; Tax reform; Political science","score_opus":0.12175072179752569,"score_gpt":0.2261057378556832,"score_spread":0.1043550160581575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232655883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98395866,0.0008051222,0.000119613505,0.003956716,0.0041421833,0.00029361754,0.0007214032,0.0000062092186,0.005996461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937087,0.0022322698,0.0013671762,0.0005457046,0.0012659093,0.000005008163,0.000016630596,0.000039987062,0.00081859407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804235,0.000096909724,0.00069194305,0.00042387424,0.00000458693,0.00074033847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958931,0.00014329147,0.00069134583,0.0003188708,0.00023127437,0.0027220787],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010779557,0.00032780707,0.00066681905,0.00067468156,0.0005232719,0.0005461057,0.00057430385,0.0007299513,0.000090496105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027845323,0.0004202328,0.00015248745,0.000067902554,0.0008755596,0.00037883414,0.000093279385,0.001372543,0.0000063492553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000906735,0.0000069362254,0.018425805,0.00008098617,0.00015667414,0.000108464206,0.034666326,0.0026173543,0.0000061025626,0.9419617,0.00024474127,0.0017158224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005173937,0.00009149621,0.01018893,0.00026829436,0.00015428469,0.00031565587,0.01981918,0.0006791771,0.00000286368,0.87474525,0.09228249,0.0009350089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67826164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99913627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32087463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014235263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011078187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234406831","doi":"","title":"Female Labor Force Participation in Latin America: Evidence of Deceleration","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Americanae (AECID Library)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad Nacional de La Plata; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Latin Americans; Demographic economics; Economics; Econometrics; Political science; Demography; Sociology; Population; Census","score_opus":0.058818557686649876,"score_gpt":0.33375076760106337,"score_spread":0.2749322099144135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234406831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99086624,0.0010982074,0.0016489545,0.0014902042,0.00054108555,0.0006180208,0.00004913331,0.00019273999,0.0034953903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98991054,0.0024351142,0.0053221127,0.00069748383,0.00023709386,0.00012346556,0.00009796495,0.000056937002,0.0011192721],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702734,0.00060682883,0.00067652407,0.0005594736,0.00064600585,0.0004838248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979971,0.0003260423,0.0006960278,0.0005394575,0.00020495469,0.00023643937],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004335791,0.0002723825,0.0005869397,0.0002590359,0.000096527605,0.00006881229,0.00063123874,0.0002539736,0.00011809692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006682487,0.00029894663,0.00011069703,0.0013424477,0.0005222906,0.0008955258,0.0003192238,0.0003934062,0.000017024933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000431672,0.0001309598,0.95342726,0.00007766663,0.00003062476,0.0000069430553,0.02784053,0.0056214863,0.00007940392,0.0028899356,0.0024741967,0.0073778206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028695568,0.00017828748,0.96636033,0.00034130298,0.000058331527,9.8483525e-8,0.018604184,0.0074456707,0.00010707617,0.00415574,0.0018631727,0.0005988518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08942933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030297302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08639959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017757776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016501845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240119872","doi":"","title":"Hidden in the Past: How Labour Relations Policy and Law Perpetuate Women's Economic Inequality","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Gender inequality; Economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.025065688615503224,"score_gpt":0.277010358408589,"score_spread":0.2519446697930858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240119872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96620435,0.00018696534,0.0000011470676,0.01983821,0.00017892929,0.00022073626,0.00010027242,0.000022709086,0.013246701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934782,0.0003875406,0.000033052434,0.003994679,0.00033790577,0.000113426635,0.0000032840826,0.0000110287465,0.0016408872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847674,0.00018045546,0.00016479137,0.00024379796,0.0001399319,0.00079426024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921656,0.00015337771,0.000057722216,0.00019130202,0.00006066181,0.00032038454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008829919,0.00014839157,0.00022540324,0.00018298523,0.0011474463,0.00015587236,0.00024329654,0.00008103054,0.00002085466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022518428,0.00012909951,0.000026593154,0.0003685285,0.00057243416,0.00020866688,0.000040284907,0.00016194631,0.000027231363],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013243916,0.000007721383,0.027185535,0.000008851775,0.000034901972,0.000008782064,0.32334492,0.000026953632,4.9251156e-7,0.64922196,0.00006268312,0.000095858355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033299124,0.000030824023,0.09831211,0.0000075069097,0.000005228508,9.541161e-7,0.7293573,0.000001826158,6.047743e-8,0.15275037,0.019020107,0.00018071369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09344983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77044916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67699933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038795893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012132388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240746250","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.34.1.93","title":"The Impact on Subsequent Violence of Returning to an Abusive Partner","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Social psychology; Psychology; Criminology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.11542081981023324,"score_gpt":0.4263565059999797,"score_spread":0.3109356861897465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240746250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98791355,0.0040379637,0.00021906271,0.00019489978,0.0006080501,0.00018833409,0.0000056074414,0.000006272637,0.006826261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956994,0.003525177,0.00032392686,0.00017301204,0.00014441657,0.0000044085346,1.9648637e-7,0.0000063954135,0.00012307975],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763805,0.00074370264,0.0005176797,0.00013515106,0.000632523,0.00033290457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969346,0.0007439951,0.00055045844,0.00015984983,0.0014433354,0.00016774723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017000707,0.00017705376,0.00051338313,0.00009816582,0.00070870767,0.000054436117,0.0003415693,0.00004259295,0.0000035911241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004120111,0.000098967146,0.00016463904,0.00039478135,0.00045428923,0.00019362032,0.000025226176,0.00024822567,0.0000054078173],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007784582,0.00061487575,0.18910636,0.00002051916,0.0018136489,0.000043825665,0.64291954,0.025303736,0.004301918,0.12028164,0.013507908,0.0013075981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045279457,0.0016107495,0.38938552,0.0002468253,0.00005493922,0.0000036083622,0.5929056,0.00005241162,0.00048074045,0.009902422,0.0046754126,0.00022902132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008510046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032008914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20027916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002315298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030994375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5450878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244523554","doi":"","title":"The Political Is Personal: Middle-Income Families in the U.S. and Canada in the Great Recession","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Society for Social Work and Research 17th Annual Conference: Social Work for a Just Society: Making Visible the Stakes and Stakeholders","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Recession; Politics; Political science; Personal income; Economics; Economic growth; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.15493935404031148,"score_gpt":0.3712489328354274,"score_spread":0.21630957879511595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244523554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8181985,0.0023078008,0.000052017684,0.1740097,0.0002849521,0.0031581698,0.00031467457,0.0000311677,0.0016430066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921366,0.00245228,0.00009466098,0.002966456,0.0006167036,0.00054989825,0.000019735537,0.00003691285,0.0011267737],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99417055,0.000982353,0.0004855844,0.00059749006,0.0016855387,0.0020784785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950329,0.0037224668,0.00016042216,0.00021095898,0.0006951617,0.00017809603],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006737517,0.00038335653,0.00045710948,0.000043578326,0.019002615,0.0016815718,0.000920732,0.00048800444,0.0000121871135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036301222,0.00021520421,0.00047333713,0.0017398632,0.0042473334,0.0002744873,0.00018230877,0.0013669416,4.0981763e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102973456,0.000052484687,0.013360745,0.00019246973,0.00014377113,0.0000010842293,0.83117664,8.366813e-7,0.0000011616243,0.08357626,0.06341506,0.0079765115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075505755,0.000083703555,0.036821928,0.00009469873,0.000051981755,5.102564e-7,0.9029075,0.00014310238,1.926938e-7,0.01847102,0.040379703,0.00029059654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07364305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16065563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17393807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003542058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013329393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244890010","doi":"10.1086/657123","title":"The Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Marriage and Divorce","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Development and Cultural Change","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Demographic economics; Conditional cash transfer; Marriage market; Cash; Marital status; Transfer (computing); Labour economics; Economic growth; Demography; Finance; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.036100268105044735,"score_gpt":0.28618004363305627,"score_spread":0.2500797755280115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244890010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912485,0.000055446828,8.764446e-7,0.00033591205,0.00026932426,0.0001400786,0.000031759315,0.000009252999,0.007908854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865544,0.00031585075,0.000038981274,0.000053358763,0.00013994578,0.000015412032,0.000020655129,0.0000033902268,0.0007569406],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995486,0.000018077271,0.000107957356,0.00011100409,0.00005596268,0.00015838377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978393,0.000046866786,0.000034389977,0.000039768143,0.000017822062,0.00007723433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021298345,0.00008022222,0.000086238484,0.000016335776,0.00044633192,0.000060938244,0.00007694557,0.000054003347,0.00008373494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075091857,0.00005079518,0.000028849063,0.000021446222,0.00021000183,0.00012403692,0.000013269262,0.00007377746,0.000008439332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010741438,0.00007314901,0.33685237,0.00003130063,0.0003182433,0.0000044884837,0.3674536,0.0000066821376,0.0012684864,0.22954752,0.004644817,0.059691917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003381293,0.000043619846,0.97125804,0.000005603476,0.000005450978,0.0000018693235,0.012534671,0.000035729954,0.000048262107,0.0009792906,0.014589355,0.00015994743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054080767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049142167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63440573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047408063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006777743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34328693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247909283","doi":"","title":"Equal Families, Equal Parents, Equal Spouses, Equal Marriage: The Case of the Missing Patriarch","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tributary; Patriarchy; Law; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Neutrality; Political science; Geography; Social science","score_opus":0.016713383836814935,"score_gpt":0.2810768293110195,"score_spread":0.2643634454742046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247909283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622398,0.0056480984,0.022012467,0.0015525608,0.0016863203,0.00052229915,0.00007029586,0.00007040625,0.006197775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99469495,0.0020463427,0.000075935845,0.00018474078,0.001741367,0.0000063881803,0.000010022304,0.000047584304,0.0011926803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992587,0.0015842011,0.0008836261,0.0003837525,0.001096532,0.0034649272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783266,0.0006051127,0.000593094,0.00049776776,0.00029743434,0.00017392602],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070301816,0.00034817323,0.00039619545,0.00013976877,0.0027057512,0.0002700596,0.0012881911,0.0002706601,0.000051840085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044092376,0.00022852457,0.00038621892,0.0008442252,0.0007174843,0.00029458976,0.00018674061,0.0026212935,0.000012811875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101371654,0.00024658965,0.020613292,0.000017911307,0.00019392931,0.000120202225,0.008830742,0.0004574618,0.00044201672,0.94502413,0.0004895215,0.023462825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00251773,0.0004181347,0.0033978627,0.000068534784,0.00033061474,0.0015101531,0.25863776,0.0007847574,0.00007141456,0.7236215,0.007821794,0.00081977824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024083527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08636622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24980702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013241089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007484405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2250116063","doi":"","title":"The Demographic Foundations of Rising Employment and Earnings Among Single Mothers in Canada and the United States, 1980 to 2000","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Baby boom; Earnings; Demographic economics; Welfare; Welfare state; Economics; Boom; Single mothers; Population; Demographic change; Cohort; Demography; Labour economics; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.061062081819386355,"score_gpt":0.3376095707773017,"score_spread":0.27654748895791537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2250116063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886111,0.001563906,0.000011134358,0.008640055,0.000033876848,0.0003095903,0.00000531612,0.000007221934,0.0008177909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798224,0.019058188,0.000025066196,0.00022204946,0.00002101112,0.000027116097,0.0000017020329,0.0000074061923,0.0008150334],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977943,0.00059207313,0.00024273388,0.00019523948,0.00067293906,0.00050271454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731034,0.0020306567,0.00003626027,0.00014478575,0.00034569803,0.00013223648],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016322106,0.00009614634,0.00021465715,0.00011374763,0.002227549,0.00007813667,0.000179904,0.00003007785,0.000006052427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013133696,0.000058564536,0.000025619262,0.0014454498,0.004521108,0.00012934687,0.00014676205,0.00023272067,4.5730675e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008374418,0.000022654558,0.91508317,0.00001360039,0.00016157837,0.0000057208745,0.07426275,0.00017991256,0.000007461772,0.008683839,0.0007073455,0.0007881966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030402452,0.00006180254,0.84051293,0.000025992651,0.000012024861,5.973655e-7,0.13587317,0.00021563571,0.0000013307987,0.0016604955,0.021247732,0.00008425677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8949024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9897484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09484602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022769098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004448666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253247878","doi":"","title":"The Contribution of Effective Marginal Tax Rates to Work Disincentives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CDU eSpace Institutional Repository (Charles Darwin University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Incentive; Payment; Work (physics); Labour economics; Business; Public economics; Economics; Finance; Economic growth; Microeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.009466971458395321,"score_gpt":0.22780346357477735,"score_spread":0.21833649211638204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253247878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96084106,0.00039118744,0.012729646,0.0033696883,0.00090175867,0.00068896567,0.00005327182,0.00008127535,0.020943152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980338,0.0001356703,0.00016082222,0.000090453024,0.0002317753,0.0000027474107,0.000010735099,0.000005559751,0.0013284155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985261,0.00032281483,0.0001474476,0.00029229544,0.00042439927,0.00028697553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873304,0.00030170323,0.00014039729,0.00013773995,0.00043747938,0.00024962772],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024265583,0.0001394617,0.0001780147,0.000085282045,0.002119747,0.000089150824,0.0004267815,0.00010197533,0.0000079803895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042348795,0.00012916703,0.00011835853,0.0009246839,0.0010080284,0.0003165038,0.00012354823,0.00016733722,0.00001779782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012572393,0.00013553283,0.23468071,0.000022694348,0.0001972028,0.00016069827,0.013469602,0.0021302362,0.0045488975,0.74125224,0.0010864056,0.0010585599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011321064,0.00024567044,0.4755092,0.00015830167,0.0001320495,0.0000035766193,0.04251029,0.00016555176,0.0017236699,0.0003101877,0.4776051,0.0005043133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022788697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020970334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.740942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042548694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058220065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254359292","doi":"","title":"Group Size and Social Interaction: a Canada-US Comparison of Interracial Marriage","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Census; White (mutation); Demography; Contrast (vision); Demographic economics; Ethnic group; Race (biology); Geography; Gender studies; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Population; Law","score_opus":0.05877278791496306,"score_gpt":0.36960209221640794,"score_spread":0.3108293043014449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254359292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89732844,0.00009852365,0.0000022645745,0.00054565136,0.001632266,0.00046469914,0.00012614443,0.000018803967,0.099783234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970474,0.0011531885,0.00016000822,0.00007083816,0.0006198306,0.000047939488,0.000043465894,0.000029882818,0.00082744594],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687165,0.0006608941,0.00068756135,0.0005995888,0.0005186148,0.00066170294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998216,0.0006234901,0.00032113917,0.00033145744,0.00027730502,0.0002306449],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023278496,0.00023675669,0.0006718438,0.00019673181,0.00037077285,0.00015259803,0.00064170564,0.0005036532,0.00007514213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007295531,0.00028408587,0.0001005507,0.00012714205,0.00074528984,0.000113879694,0.00087238,0.0015269427,0.0000011098886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010188222,0.0009426438,0.53913325,0.0009636726,0.00063294044,0.00008681224,0.22978975,0.0019706176,0.00016637181,0.014396031,0.0052802623,0.20561886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025627902,0.00033548,0.20395708,0.0003812022,0.00006947607,0.000006114368,0.5122947,0.010296748,0.000017314562,0.011126674,0.2571925,0.0017599344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32496983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93041104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6054412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025375567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037273413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254622423","doi":"","title":"The New Mothers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.020794433003574368,"score_gpt":0.26884685935394653,"score_spread":0.24805242635037217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254622423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80644566,0.003892363,0.000010928171,0.023065789,0.0012237619,0.00025610015,0.000014944535,0.00007713386,0.16501331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92468905,0.0018665183,0.0000989823,0.004345187,0.00081691315,0.00002250534,5.5341195e-7,0.000013161191,0.06814713],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886036,0.00004975431,0.00010107852,0.00013394978,0.00016584831,0.0006889891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917316,0.00010508044,0.00002793642,0.00014609919,0.00007430673,0.000473429],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034070772,0.000089835,0.000107377964,0.000049967744,0.0017046076,0.000077827666,0.00025571458,0.000044542012,0.000065586755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000192602,0.00006922115,0.000031323256,0.00022844467,0.00034605546,0.000072943614,0.000017473514,0.00007689442,0.000117267045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037589705,0.000008790293,0.010113685,0.000005224488,0.00026058275,0.000008174107,0.63898665,0.000081056256,0.0000037231132,0.2386507,0.09220344,0.019674215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006315614,0.0000073591723,0.0010551685,0.0000019499569,0.0000036678703,1.10078496e-7,0.40361953,0.0000056704707,2.2855349e-7,0.0065443446,0.588623,0.000075819975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012938346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7714761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75853777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010936313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001040677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255951148","doi":"","title":"Double Jeopardy: Motherwork and the Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Double jeopardy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02351369952217024,"score_gpt":0.2630656685474667,"score_spread":0.23955196902529646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255951148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66260356,0.002660144,0.0000034543136,0.0015438466,0.0005738538,0.00025987203,0.000008692938,0.00002893822,0.33231765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98845994,0.00085279555,0.000043414584,0.0035197753,0.00009907268,0.000056110457,3.646483e-7,0.000010028789,0.006958477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998912,0.00013141539,0.00010067207,0.00016397996,0.0001404124,0.00055155536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993417,0.00012807029,0.000029210541,0.00014447539,0.00008051784,0.00027600682],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007290994,0.0001037746,0.00018493357,0.00003854592,0.0015514899,0.000082394254,0.00013526142,0.000050792645,0.00004872812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110667985,0.000076056735,0.000027653761,0.00023004627,0.001191152,0.00006073196,0.0000156903,0.00008619169,0.000020953848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004367033,0.0000026034688,0.003874856,0.000004207049,0.00006380801,0.000003340329,0.122889094,0.000003487286,2.2856679e-7,0.87264836,0.000471651,0.00003402425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008149941,0.000012087854,0.00054782885,0.000006252064,0.000015724236,6.9408765e-7,0.6571074,0.0000022292918,6.109432e-7,0.08908388,0.25225672,0.0001515366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02162133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5149628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78356445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032742516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031491191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257655993","doi":"10.1111/caje.12004","title":"Teen families, welfare transfers, and the minimum wage: evidence from Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Earnings; Economics; Minimum wage; Pooling; Demographic economics; Fertility; Hourly wage; Wage; Labour economics; Demography; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.0653097004570313,"score_gpt":0.1833487101418758,"score_spread":0.11803900968484449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257655993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96497697,0.0010883557,0.000017713804,0.030046066,0.0016315145,0.00044488205,0.0002975976,0.0000050750527,0.0014918268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952446,0.0015838963,0.00017952365,0.0018841834,0.00060517323,0.000019688763,0.000008656922,0.000031699783,0.00044258422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978699,0.00023800922,0.00070779404,0.0003216899,0.000008805368,0.00085382094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643505,0.00051382167,0.0003249389,0.00033869324,0.0002830224,0.0021044994],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090353464,0.00026164443,0.0005632068,0.00020529266,0.00079913903,0.00033234214,0.0008924969,0.00019464693,0.00044368466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004541398,0.00024714213,0.00014279418,0.0001390846,0.0007451735,0.00064425555,0.000018096427,0.00042079214,0.0000063580264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012743383,0.000012451532,0.15864657,0.000047845977,0.00058321573,0.00022682924,0.08558451,0.001373422,0.000013830094,0.7270447,0.010312496,0.016026719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005599768,0.00042955612,0.26967955,0.00040702,0.00044196472,0.00019916189,0.27513787,0.0054858364,0.000022681434,0.23168875,0.2084586,0.0024492517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49535593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002385178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009921519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258566072","doi":"10.5937/ejae12-8672","title":"The effect of incentive return-to-work policies on single-parent families: A comparative approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Journal of Applied Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Incentive; Solidarity; Economics; Labour economics; Work (physics); Welfare; Income Support; Welfare reform; Tax credit; Single mothers; Inequality; Working poor; Public economics; Economic growth; Poverty; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.054022995123081924,"score_gpt":0.27035530437536676,"score_spread":0.21633230925228483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258566072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7608099,0.000078319994,0.0002478606,0.00022596879,0.000382532,0.00027676555,0.000005953155,0.000008547277,0.23796415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879897,0.00018249894,0.00025633856,0.00016850315,0.00047152262,0.0000023900873,0.0000012165855,0.000020468997,0.000098123055],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979496,0.0008559345,0.0005311563,0.0001392363,0.00022348244,0.00030060648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824816,0.00051923667,0.0006381859,0.00026810297,0.0001302862,0.00019603055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046103746,0.00017421691,0.000366966,0.00007629553,0.0004000038,0.00012566123,0.00091696036,0.000029527971,0.0000010404356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008827198,0.00010069759,0.0001213745,0.00023062588,0.00052549894,0.00006197192,0.0001119968,0.00029484835,0.00003084425],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043469802,0.0003277522,0.008884011,0.000024496925,0.0007199178,0.00000519017,0.75516737,0.13332073,0.00017156686,0.07148898,0.010265987,0.015277032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054996284,0.0049550883,0.04856483,0.00017544835,0.00034424735,0.0000119887345,0.8515885,0.0008474858,0.0011144242,0.0061511016,0.07968172,0.0010655797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030190366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004141177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23798904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024204377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011023999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41063282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259077194","doi":"","title":"State Tax Revenue Decline Accelerates","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Tax revenue; Quarter (Canadian coin); State (computer science); Business; Economics; Monetary economics; Finance; Public economics; Geography","score_opus":0.02060985414830356,"score_gpt":0.27629339133304903,"score_spread":0.25568353718474546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259077194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.973833,0.0072043473,0.00320066,0.004722242,0.000747334,0.00016103599,0.000026015732,0.00005898555,0.010046353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9105937,0.044723887,0.000121966106,0.00035954616,0.0006617224,0.0000026770679,0.0000019628253,0.000019493102,0.043515064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996624,0.0001972634,0.00025709314,0.00017180081,0.0004116772,0.0023381864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993675,0.00005338757,0.00014902503,0.0001295617,0.00014470004,0.00015582117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001934794,0.00012954144,0.00015885245,0.00008224793,0.0008054426,0.00016327399,0.00042974763,0.00008791958,0.00019740815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013871286,0.00012269177,0.000096516706,0.00033587115,0.00011299671,0.00026411784,0.00003457158,0.0012449767,0.00014750408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000808224,0.00073493004,0.1579465,0.00002157854,0.0006440298,0.000085760556,0.05495469,0.0005435168,0.0010293755,0.52882963,0.029828243,0.22530092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011101916,0.000301767,0.0070402785,0.000023561503,0.00005151084,0.000112525144,0.025267662,0.00060752424,0.000019389825,0.80709916,0.15783043,0.0005360051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009502897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03541609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27826953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069801573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010300505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98218507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259966171","doi":"","title":"Personal Income Tax Revenue Rebounds as Sales Tax Falters","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Tax revenue; Revenue; State income tax; Economics; Ad valorem tax; Sales tax; Personal income; Value-added tax; Gross income; Business; Personal income tax; Income tax; Tax reform; Labour economics; Monetary economics; Public economics; Finance; Macroeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.01058772534912373,"score_gpt":0.280952966519962,"score_spread":0.27036524117083827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259966171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813444,0.0025375618,0.0047493046,0.001458676,0.0009540368,0.00013517034,0.000020727693,0.000043316348,0.008756777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689678,0.005322845,0.00016787226,0.00033955867,0.0014058395,0.0000020070847,0.0000058920614,0.000028225344,0.023759956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952853,0.0002077502,0.0003470697,0.00025118332,0.000750142,0.003158581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908864,0.000108582375,0.00022426144,0.00014162785,0.00016025563,0.00027664617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057349238,0.00018765285,0.00021278103,0.00018227378,0.0012692892,0.00015901212,0.0004988636,0.000188172,0.000050013212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022112908,0.00018660122,0.00018122271,0.0004420687,0.00029731463,0.00028569228,0.00003698949,0.0018341297,0.00011792277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000189348,0.00019523725,0.17713544,0.000019162617,0.00038428762,0.000120062796,0.048202075,0.000020794201,0.00093266676,0.74562377,0.002465997,0.02471116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015523569,0.00069903495,0.058815878,0.00008108383,0.00010886859,0.00068610016,0.22659051,0.00005555319,0.000017954593,0.5947821,0.11568603,0.00092452584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029913033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087565415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17838843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021523943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046409625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9762475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261210879","doi":"","title":"Femme Fiscale Brings Women’s Voices to the Legislature","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015778674911277962,"score_gpt":0.2541532039539447,"score_spread":0.23837452904266673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261210879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92964095,0.0008876144,0.000004904779,0.011668704,0.0009487519,0.00028407978,0.00007641722,0.000062231506,0.056426372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946944,0.00012588894,0.00005209259,0.0055128406,0.0008695678,0.00017922561,0.0000033627355,0.0000178262,0.046295166],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978859,0.00008027731,0.00017346987,0.0003053591,0.00031478176,0.0012402157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989561,0.00010205252,0.000051151546,0.00024665578,0.0001611286,0.00048291485],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055431185,0.00018427713,0.0002395404,0.00013486069,0.0017038817,0.0001635527,0.00045601136,0.00009589728,0.00007049652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016278781,0.00014620756,0.000048517577,0.0005871211,0.00033239296,0.000121518315,0.00006275762,0.00016980969,0.00011791845],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075077883,0.000028938744,0.052504964,0.00003142524,0.00018755678,0.00004343156,0.7894589,0.00013891529,0.00001301424,0.050680444,0.10615637,0.0007485473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008322784,0.000024690538,0.023444075,0.000007809233,0.0000063487905,4.3048345e-7,0.39165938,0.0000024193337,5.6318845e-7,0.007816547,0.57677007,0.00018446308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058075126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.819498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7614229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020560431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046094705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263971084","doi":"","title":"The ‘Final Say’ Is Not the Last Word. Gendered Patterns, Perceptions, and Processes in Household Decision Making Among Chinese Immigrant Couples in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Research in Antropology & Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Immigration; Power (physics); Perception; Demographic economics; Inequality; Social psychology; Sociology; Qualitative property; Distribution (mathematics); Consumption (sociology); Psychology; Gender studies; Economics; Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.09185220090461267,"score_gpt":0.42098594861531,"score_spread":0.32913374771069737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263971084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906012,0.0015226101,0.00006124166,0.0070645353,0.00038328388,0.0002664274,0.000015356874,0.000002566155,0.000082782004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99216455,0.007270576,0.00007967064,0.00024087937,0.00020623246,0.000016109007,9.848499e-7,0.000007950175,0.000013025261],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558926,0.002233659,0.0006338636,0.00022801309,0.0005661494,0.00074906077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99337316,0.0057208706,0.00025759096,0.00015575634,0.0003935193,0.0000990806],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051077106,0.0001516816,0.0004613858,0.00029244428,0.0008722874,0.00006701371,0.0006909057,0.0001952831,0.000029758474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007859086,0.00008824214,0.000046578105,0.0005493229,0.0040459177,0.00014330252,0.0001206249,0.0023161035,9.2449056e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017554815,0.00005461907,0.94612104,0.000007786827,0.000019196063,0.00006265318,0.05103737,0.0001196287,0.0001378849,0.0014047286,0.00027721233,0.0005823215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005052321,0.00006620652,0.79072964,0.000037072277,0.0000025481381,0.000019601644,0.20148396,0.00036662474,0.0000014799265,0.0065270304,0.00019023848,0.000070363596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26585156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99227333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7264218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046713848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029601252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264065638","doi":"","title":"Who Benefited from the Deduction-Inclusion Regime for Taxing Child Support?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Economics; Tax deduction; Disadvantaged; Tax rate; Income tax; Child support; Payment; Inclusion (mineral); Government (linguistics); State income tax; Public economics; Gross income; Labour economics; Monetary economics; Tax reform; Finance; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.008719981079635664,"score_gpt":0.2519119577759093,"score_spread":0.24319197669627363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264065638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96346825,0.0034598364,0.0035580304,0.016430398,0.00074122456,0.00039259196,0.000029377541,0.00007314248,0.011847139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735,0.013342095,0.00015664056,0.0008335202,0.0024704281,0.000008434253,0.000022752054,0.000026937652,0.009639165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717873,0.00015051386,0.00025578987,0.00021773722,0.00041917415,0.0017780303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936044,0.00010083595,0.00013861823,0.00017647615,0.00011605758,0.0001075423],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019926315,0.00013814084,0.0001550273,0.000044842123,0.004458035,0.00013326114,0.0005265242,0.00013019075,0.00031149635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008344987,0.000105998944,0.00016103052,0.00027417482,0.000107720545,0.00024287535,0.00004657937,0.0010009331,0.000023052338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031893904,0.0003431286,0.020009423,0.000008143481,0.00073956687,0.000006462172,0.0986431,0.001528649,0.0003085754,0.4931697,0.015206589,0.36971775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014426287,0.00031254036,0.011272074,0.0000551419,0.0001503159,0.00008613678,0.055231243,0.0005632136,0.00001693841,0.66438884,0.2659969,0.0004840254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017979651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013573911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3692337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069512904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001645508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99683803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267745215","doi":"10.5539/res.v8n1p102","title":"Added Worker Effect Revisited: The “Aubry’s Law” in France as a Natural Experiment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spillover effect; Unemployment; Economics; Natural experiment; Wage; Labour economics; Work (physics); Compensation (psychology); Labour supply; Demographic economics; Work hours; Government (linguistics); Working hours; Psychology; Economic growth; Social psychology","score_opus":0.025278133453493494,"score_gpt":0.34001040459154525,"score_spread":0.31473227113805174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267745215","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049301147,0.86101526,0.0000038539833,0.0020506752,0.0003831403,0.000644565,0.0000036898514,0.000032560445,0.0865651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50037843,0.49579307,0.00004305332,0.0016161946,0.00015312813,0.000020340802,5.4138656e-7,0.0000124960725,0.0019827448],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972418,0.0015817323,0.0003659402,0.00022834721,0.000320524,0.00026165307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890924,0.00045054045,0.00016178926,0.0003059963,0.00013520355,0.00003721885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025781023,0.00015460658,0.00044349686,0.000022688153,0.00021464315,0.000013640957,0.00035053937,0.000016982212,0.000028559785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009332611,0.00007261104,0.00013553079,0.00031477938,0.0004337653,0.00008809904,0.0001423666,0.00009752861,0.00013048701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010132301,0.00046009032,0.08620496,0.013742326,0.0015274854,0.00022636502,0.12685254,0.0000017497265,0.0021049588,0.27264348,0.115498506,0.38063622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006814864,0.00013718476,0.037976537,0.029426716,0.00010283887,0.0000016912253,0.006406875,5.532401e-7,0.000045824352,0.00023514684,0.9246246,0.00036051756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005991513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005141849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80912614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005415945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023195003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29609922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268536221","doi":"10.1111/iere.12160","title":"MARRIAGE, MARKETS, AND MONEY: A COASIAN THEORY OF HOUSEHOLD FORMATION","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Coase theorem; Economics; Inflation tax; Cash; Inflation (cosmology); Monetary economics; Labour economics; Transaction cost; Microeconomics; Monetary policy; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.028948162726548023,"score_gpt":0.2805173889517391,"score_spread":0.25156922622519107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268536221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4819298,0.038082123,0.0050156997,0.018048001,0.002630274,0.0011937867,0.0005607473,0.00010585383,0.4524337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7823454,0.21458992,0.00015589033,0.000547517,0.000113465496,0.000016309212,0.000007174448,0.0000073567385,0.0022169435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993164,0.000109344015,0.0002820846,0.00011158512,0.00008879012,0.00009180944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999503,0.00013440617,0.00017740883,0.000100064404,0.00003820361,0.000046891953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095508195,0.00006112802,0.00014549466,0.00004076474,0.00004560858,0.000019388643,0.00019604301,0.00003491037,0.00046575654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012598487,0.000046555797,0.00005381919,0.000022702188,0.00010537115,0.00030654893,0.000034544068,0.000025644913,0.00003567439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025930578,0.000033199205,0.019244459,0.00033298868,0.000102431746,0.0000015607184,0.0012186042,0.0000024401354,0.00006291073,0.7431685,0.011361924,0.22444509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000858581,0.000027283706,0.058219377,0.0023242312,0.000066098815,0.0000113966835,0.0011275754,0.00011051981,0.000036341735,0.070187114,0.8666921,0.00033934828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007606975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010480134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8553302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011682954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006521593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5099708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270281102","doi":"","title":"How your sexual orientation can affect how much you earn","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Sexual orientation; Affect (linguistics); Census; Demographic economics; Wage; Labour economics; Gender studies; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Economics; Demography; Population; Finance","score_opus":0.09013613266401185,"score_gpt":0.38516622825706986,"score_spread":0.29503009559305804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270281102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.965063,0.00018999337,0.000037141013,0.02564743,0.0005504784,0.00064050977,0.00044010684,0.000024737341,0.0074066455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949668,0.0012062327,0.0014770995,0.00045775322,0.0007567836,0.000016078566,0.000022342281,0.000029074536,0.0010678193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920217,0.00039092868,0.0008864453,0.0014849877,0.00097171473,0.0042442568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875587,0.0008106622,0.0003167312,0.000743169,0.001704719,0.008866014],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013088774,0.00042061883,0.0008695559,0.0011413818,0.0012451276,0.0018935195,0.00168114,0.00033511466,0.00004221921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009444419,0.00039812588,0.00014044366,0.0014794171,0.014466676,0.0023748402,0.0008430408,0.0008501956,0.00001678601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000534922,0.00016352856,0.07289549,0.000032309716,0.000017198223,0.0000026704665,0.0005327319,0.000034142988,0.00042457957,0.92485255,0.000095210184,0.0008960672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053205937,0.0034115769,0.30339482,0.000121105004,0.000118168246,0.000060418017,0.15682586,0.03112329,0.0027001866,0.47582817,0.01891369,0.0021821335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015686547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047980244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4490244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017891612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01106409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272163742","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1107246","title":"An Efficient Nonparametric Test of the Collective Household Model","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nonparametric statistics; Test (biology); Econometrics; Computer science; Economics; Geology","score_opus":0.020829743255302853,"score_gpt":0.25635620374736395,"score_spread":0.2355264604920611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272163742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98421264,0.0005531088,0.009482948,0.00015735731,0.00020413748,0.00018090851,0.000010419585,0.000025922274,0.005172553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99529326,0.001978282,0.00016154688,0.00007773113,0.00013436293,0.0000028836193,4.0044978e-7,0.000016501628,0.002335006],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728394,0.00018153306,0.00024141061,0.00016841116,0.00062433,0.0015003815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991436,0.00012342598,0.00019912772,0.00021291852,0.00020866164,0.000112289825],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014792202,0.00011731863,0.00016808938,0.0001498693,0.0013232437,0.000029982848,0.0006117897,0.000103796345,0.0000038268495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027095815,0.00008730115,0.00013599764,0.0013153165,0.00032108816,0.00009790099,0.000027006796,0.0010408137,0.0000022757076],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066790504,0.0017966544,0.30291593,0.000006712993,0.00018728807,0.000006278331,0.0526904,0.38411987,0.0013410847,0.25524223,0.0004099615,0.0012167961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036303438,0.0019147904,0.24222228,0.000048351965,0.00025586426,0.00047950784,0.116199724,0.27355978,0.00033040464,0.35962924,0.00047002823,0.0012596631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046866765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023650306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110560074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001489366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010569493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274773060","doi":"10.14288/1.0073804","title":"Gender identity and in/fertility","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Identity (music); Gender studies; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Population; Art","score_opus":0.017076893671027476,"score_gpt":0.2131218344707712,"score_spread":0.19604494079974374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274773060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901625,0.00013223352,0.00022277293,0.00007398156,0.00010988921,0.00020549355,0.000023009632,0.00003357975,0.009036543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987565,0.00029074517,0.00024064298,0.000047751568,0.000013505257,3.4803986e-7,0.0000028302554,0.000004072881,0.00064355944],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991194,0.000095962954,0.00008148894,0.00023861369,0.00022856481,0.00023594039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952096,0.00003000551,0.000047880887,0.00013068029,0.0001446331,0.0001258342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029902445,0.000025626814,0.00014430306,0.000030706393,0.00030722842,0.00013961468,0.00022969635,0.00010871957,0.00023182372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004236065,0.00009862053,0.000043743385,0.0002709101,0.00046705172,0.0008306567,0.00009538826,0.00009512149,0.000022241298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017055727,0.00007109891,0.9453557,0.000028116066,0.00000987481,0.000016835113,0.0038829376,0.0000013192903,0.00003767541,0.000036810405,0.0005798759,0.04997801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003036479,0.0000073840665,0.9684451,0.000012919098,0.000007806308,0.0000012030672,0.025105264,0.000088524095,1.6092294e-8,0.0058152825,0.000115413925,0.00009740174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6889615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91239953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.223438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007268888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097375276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40216282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274970812","doi":"","title":"寻找阿基米德的“杠杆”——“出生季度”是个弱工具变量吗?","year":2010,"lang":"zh","type":"article","venue":"经济学(季刊)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Instrumental variable; Variable (mathematics); Sample (material); Population; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Demography; Economics; Geography; Mathematics; Sociology","score_opus":0.018288531670175516,"score_gpt":0.28000400568307143,"score_spread":0.2617154740128959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274970812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59841704,0.0006702865,0.00025337824,0.0024084172,0.011625109,0.00043857348,0.0001185962,0.00023439455,0.38583422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569335,0.0009634918,0.00088040816,0.0013658393,0.0029220872,0.000020942558,0.000033286055,0.000068274654,0.03681217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605685,0.00023198262,0.00057195424,0.0008188771,0.0009897802,0.0013305756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766874,0.00023822428,0.00025813218,0.0008975614,0.00030861658,0.0006287336],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010188441,0.00047430352,0.0005128596,0.00015129855,0.0011114329,0.00037197818,0.001153728,0.00083811133,0.0021567112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035346192,0.00048314602,0.00032159238,0.0008893147,0.00086039945,0.00038712862,0.0002168625,0.0011525151,0.002545641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054939042,0.0009351047,0.16552183,0.00015190447,0.00025478407,0.00011477562,0.07307443,0.00003931203,0.0063697603,0.68691057,0.040124193,0.0264484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014652533,0.00025169578,0.18686427,0.00007985409,0.00024377747,0.000015571008,0.034772985,0.0013973123,0.000087602326,0.040763266,0.7322787,0.0017797304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034659863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011063341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69215447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011974463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276122061","doi":"","title":"Why Women Would Gain From a Guaranteed Livable Income","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.02085389119058049,"score_gpt":0.2600448096313693,"score_spread":0.2391909184407888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276122061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97969073,0.0010420036,0.000020109675,0.0019273391,0.00084432296,0.0002687528,0.00016775346,0.00010309232,0.015935898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841524,0.00044485708,0.00017468243,0.012539112,0.00029800853,0.00014945306,0.00000717766,0.000028364591,0.002205953],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974088,0.00009860331,0.0002582848,0.00040076085,0.00035232576,0.0014812435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985415,0.00010915186,0.00007368243,0.00029589832,0.00016920519,0.00081060885],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004945957,0.0002450618,0.00042019025,0.00023897174,0.0012958164,0.000121971745,0.00043604337,0.00023315869,0.00022276482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033114292,0.0002525813,0.00006090642,0.000680119,0.0005062293,0.00017377501,0.00006681555,0.0003065637,0.00013088038],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001791408,0.000056552875,0.02971769,0.000034861085,0.000573773,0.00015020676,0.9304087,0.00020139058,0.000040445975,0.03613715,0.0024637303,0.00019758221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066615886,0.00007752429,0.0050305533,0.000041764135,0.000018051876,5.279415e-7,0.8247579,0.0000054748975,0.0000023357443,0.09916495,0.06981171,0.00042308652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14886875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.559503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41063425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004240347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013584484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277417327","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2734726","title":"Female Employment and Violence in the Household: Evidence from the Latin American Demographic and Health Surveys","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Demographic economics; Occupational safety and health; Geography; Demography; Environmental health; Medicine; Political science; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.041602920153472306,"score_gpt":0.30544349523917824,"score_spread":0.2638405750857059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277417327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761085,0.0092277285,0.0025345068,0.011852989,0.00006660092,0.00016898318,0.0000066978278,0.000012209892,0.000021810565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8396923,0.15954904,0.000034813256,0.00056226784,0.000116816285,0.0000046397454,2.7019288e-7,0.0000069749067,0.000032860673],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996424,0.0015770061,0.00021181008,0.00020270761,0.00035809862,0.0012263852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884814,0.0007060354,0.00017022727,0.0001571326,0.00003085772,0.00008759176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010596679,0.00010675883,0.0001481639,0.000046409725,0.0006893267,0.0001058734,0.00038841358,0.000033724198,0.0000021460796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013897697,0.000052769796,0.000034345434,0.00036650314,0.00048266564,0.00015370775,0.00003548905,0.0006012426,9.162751e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004305628,0.000013714232,0.92367476,6.5564933e-7,0.0000133157,7.2912667e-7,0.00722583,0.0000013702651,0.000013212656,0.007086113,0.000011664121,0.06195434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018165928,0.00015213339,0.92601943,0.00009317152,0.0000071198892,0.000006271251,0.03694258,0.0000064298215,3.2559296e-7,0.036412813,0.00009823148,0.000079852754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040009927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3286856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28867567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028210267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012625733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96638274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277632001","doi":"10.5539/ass.v12n3p24","title":"Factors Influencing the Labor Force Participation of Married Women in the United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Life expectancy; Economics; Demographic economics; Unemployment rate; Unemployment; Labour economics; Demography; Sociology; Economic growth; Population","score_opus":0.0306785493777813,"score_gpt":0.31371291548735447,"score_spread":0.28303436610957317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277632001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98533744,0.000004426206,0.0000677781,0.0027563493,0.000116073075,0.00017758863,0.000011610894,0.000026958503,0.011501763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999369,0.000018930212,0.000007313507,0.00040262012,0.000055496905,0.000018200353,0.0000010467074,0.0000048601287,0.0001225158],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981383,0.0002957577,0.00018740576,0.00015860362,0.00065194175,0.0005679747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992329,0.00026867402,0.0001231186,0.00013747961,0.00016050677,0.00007734677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026067316,0.00007574047,0.00009948468,0.00008620149,0.0008551283,0.000081948514,0.000726109,0.000050824376,0.000014584918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006309603,0.00003674966,0.00002761432,0.0023093747,0.0017299639,0.00032751748,0.000044273616,0.000074165044,0.0000020095492],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041644407,0.000021137028,0.16074808,0.0000022399975,0.000003158619,2.9890256e-7,0.7701449,0.0000032980038,0.0010863695,0.0634561,0.0000355034,0.004494758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007888246,0.000014421949,0.6587598,0.000004560261,0.0000023567454,1.4322237e-8,0.33191192,0.000009859458,0.00005190801,0.00817976,0.000934811,0.000051712115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019441894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018114676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4980117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027323695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037864482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6577042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278683968","doi":"10.15609/annaeconstat2009.117-118.379","title":"Gender Role Attitudes and Women's Labor Market Participation: Opting-Out, AIDS and the President Appeal of Housewifery","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Economics and Statistics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumental variable; Context (archaeology); Appeal; Educational attainment; Shock (circulatory); Demographic economics; Economics; Pill; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Economic growth; Medicine; Geography; Law; Econometrics","score_opus":0.07331196034390307,"score_gpt":0.3261212260496027,"score_spread":0.2528092657056996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278683968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99488604,0.0011863391,0.0005922292,0.00028909338,0.000091937574,0.00013490609,0.00031584327,0.000005107535,0.0024985052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873243,0.009577887,0.0025736056,0.00023162545,0.00005598574,0.000008682602,0.0000042792058,0.000007831044,0.00021582792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991993,0.00010893991,0.000277143,0.00013889995,0.00007684633,0.00019887114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910766,0.0003012552,0.0001719789,0.000104549195,0.00016516981,0.00014938352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001185202,0.00008508231,0.00023254038,0.00003054963,0.00012496501,0.00007191823,0.00008244791,0.00005255789,0.000008942683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020929016,0.000072217845,0.000014570126,0.000034020457,0.000553966,0.00009546478,0.00006525471,0.00004703947,3.360525e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017189175,0.00007006882,0.26040965,0.00009355474,0.00015244746,0.0000010006696,0.07555692,0.00026186695,0.0000023173777,0.658016,0.0013072098,0.0039570467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020997827,0.00034905784,0.676302,0.000023186707,0.00008219864,0.0000013566116,0.06204972,0.014474089,0.0000148602185,0.23770925,0.006534786,0.0003597043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033587025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007084171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4203068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010500923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013550227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29449582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280760314","doi":"","title":"A Married Mom and Dad Really Do Matter: New Evidence from Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.017104590392476887,"score_gpt":0.2530223999140064,"score_spread":0.2359178095215295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280760314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.919364,0.00024485466,0.0015173956,0.0054169167,0.00041455188,0.00011267415,0.000012678649,0.00004073277,0.07287619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850382,0.00022902679,0.0016270869,0.0026619988,0.00022339386,0.0000018504692,0.0000032413031,0.000007356844,0.010207811],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989882,0.000096208234,0.0001250695,0.00023307119,0.0003073848,0.00025004413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924153,0.00022620495,0.00003971216,0.0001930861,0.000045101136,0.0002543683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024351773,0.000087344764,0.00012070533,0.000015997157,0.00021693397,0.00012680017,0.00022760984,0.00006382179,0.00054698816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013545084,0.00007861492,0.000014758547,0.00010586178,0.00007291527,0.00013770921,0.00004649956,0.00006630576,0.00002536128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008227042,0.000006154755,0.8919163,0.0000062365184,0.000015037867,0.0000035301446,0.008970713,0.000008859121,0.00015944598,0.008316972,0.08672074,0.0038678122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024353161,0.000019403979,0.92849076,0.000039593266,0.000021592268,4.6336277e-7,0.0097417645,0.00041459204,0.000008510751,0.01015511,0.050586578,0.00027808017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99100816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9894433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06567423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079391735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008273805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59891367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281194592","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401912018","title":"Globalizing Concern for Women’s Human Rights: The Failure of the American Model. By Diana G. Zoelle. New York: St. Martin’s, 2000. 169p. $49.95.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Human rights; Panacea (medicine); Convention; Multinational corporation; Democracy; Ideology; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.03752125067306954,"score_gpt":0.3422662927023365,"score_spread":0.30474504202926694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281194592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67789936,0.0409245,0.0068778917,0.18818547,0.000888017,0.0072843065,0.000842191,0.0004085501,0.0766897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98008674,0.004642886,0.00054957723,0.0122899255,0.00021628728,0.000097089076,0.0000045209104,0.000020733607,0.0020922425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507946,0.00036392795,0.00061119546,0.00060054834,0.0011590834,0.0021857796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972414,0.00028230567,0.00051344826,0.00073234324,0.0002463677,0.0009841494],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020368025,0.00028205328,0.000707574,0.00003800633,0.0018204234,0.00014112564,0.002122641,0.000041962765,0.00006673972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005802098,0.00016663138,0.0002646936,0.0029145014,0.011327716,0.00022259187,0.00018311085,0.00022664803,0.00001313208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011045234,0.0001723668,0.014414587,0.00017746026,0.000051035076,0.0000016247511,0.0045201266,0.00002636546,0.0001516229,0.8561421,0.09724097,0.027090676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021924159,0.000194171,0.002709078,0.00036471477,0.00011297767,0.0000041496296,0.013188656,0.0009000692,0.000010450381,0.028980272,0.9528028,0.00051343295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05261111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005641579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8555618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009940192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014967398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282311145","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2015-049","title":"The Differential Impact of Universal Child Benefits on the Labour Supply of Married and Single Mothers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Labour supply; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Economics; Single mothers; Differential effects; Child care; Labour economics; Psychology; Medicine; Developmental psychology; Nursing","score_opus":0.01544939762235638,"score_gpt":0.23979354872919786,"score_spread":0.22434415110684147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282311145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9543683,0.00004498387,0.0000025329027,0.02403619,0.0000863131,0.00012878512,0.00057278987,0.000007717024,0.020752402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984152,0.00015442804,0.0000016482888,0.0002802091,0.00015241993,0.0000016311153,0.0000019599142,0.000009846844,0.0009826734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905527,0.000110388,0.0001094936,0.00010831444,0.00016946725,0.00044704092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907583,0.0001581373,0.000078847705,0.0002138235,0.000091710186,0.0003816218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002111131,0.00008845732,0.000103480714,0.00016110469,0.0005238818,0.00006618536,0.0003657234,0.00007641132,0.000098065575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029561567,0.00004570053,0.00006477604,0.0003385506,0.0005752472,0.0000872451,0.000020605692,0.00006002762,0.000002017133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070101287,0.000013712125,0.031750396,0.0000019231832,0.000061002,3.516669e-7,0.0034761974,0.0000010818077,0.00011684178,0.9517564,0.001122679,0.011692382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004693116,0.00011696128,0.96949905,0.000025099374,0.000011199837,9.0942115e-7,0.0051250025,0.000014288804,0.000026965396,0.0034215413,0.021143615,0.00014607578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5005685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6210278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9483349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003767813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019657896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50275725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283625973","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2015-054","title":"Effects of the 2001 Extension of Paid Parental Leave Provisions on Birth Seasonality in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Seasonality; Demography; Geography; Demographic economics; Economics; Ecology; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.017366415115919864,"score_gpt":0.2531139881592007,"score_spread":0.23574757304328087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283625973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97882843,0.000039161347,0.0000018859656,0.013731169,0.0002603244,0.00029161404,0.0003149504,0.0000056110475,0.0065268367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997897,0.000047028625,0.0000047955473,0.001228753,0.00008969608,0.0000081302105,0.0000023812454,0.000008003602,0.0007141867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984549,0.00025860508,0.0001793955,0.00017082866,0.00034973136,0.0005865182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987662,0.00020651819,0.00009285146,0.0002609409,0.000113692426,0.00055983703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003310897,0.00009262636,0.00015406408,0.00014235718,0.00018311299,0.000012244521,0.00036915333,0.00007105159,0.000026594298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015181837,0.000060801507,0.00005019558,0.000725703,0.00023200308,0.00008311778,0.000030998817,0.00008481165,0.0000021651094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039082015,0.000041563377,0.8844663,0.000028629205,0.000011814799,0.000007077206,0.0013440702,0.0000020511204,0.00020850934,0.09428291,0.009417946,0.010185212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024965813,0.00001636561,0.98375314,0.000054662567,0.000002696294,3.483038e-7,0.001015172,0.000015110703,0.0000525595,0.0010692043,0.013684573,0.000086525135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09928682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022377572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040572196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9648669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285211598","doi":"","title":"Before and After Reform: How Have Families on Welfare Changed?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Welfare; Welfare reform; Quarter (Canadian coin); Cash; Social policy; Economics; Aid to Families with Dependent Children; Labour economics; Term (time); Work (physics); Demographic economics; Economic growth; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.017586663266978476,"score_gpt":0.25798871359511705,"score_spread":0.24040205032813858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285211598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7923617,0.000069595415,0.000041235784,0.014812181,0.00020429664,0.00014475886,0.000010639005,0.0000813522,0.19227427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682526,0.00046700297,0.00015891192,0.0010391269,0.00021273836,0.000018401235,0.0000057918883,0.000010317703,0.029835083],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990774,0.00003874735,0.000074273055,0.0002099534,0.0002644471,0.00033521093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996313,0.000008275873,0.000025100118,0.00015148878,0.00006084173,0.00012299271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000174428,0.000114672446,0.00011590928,0.0000689884,0.00039526104,0.00009950086,0.000115111296,0.0001240566,0.0001731088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021390048,0.00008716403,0.000037435013,0.00013960748,0.00017781499,0.00016873986,0.000037441565,0.00009141494,0.000020444368],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057653644,0.0000960737,0.7360186,0.000024870249,0.000034801214,0.000055678243,0.11425898,0.0000012420219,0.000010988872,0.10843065,0.00074532797,0.040265143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020969355,0.00010592862,0.6512823,0.000010065322,0.000009480789,0.0000015135038,0.18425116,0.00006131311,0.0000025398192,0.0012818759,0.16260222,0.00018192177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034484211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.108561635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17589095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000979263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022408994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9077048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288692974","doi":"10.1111/1467-8268.12169","title":"The Threat of Domestic Violence and Women Empowerment: The Case of West Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Development Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Empowerment; Residence; Wife; Economic growth; Political science; Geography; Development economics; Socioeconomics; Demographic economics; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Economics; Environmental health; Medicine","score_opus":0.017997504709732496,"score_gpt":0.28102317613347727,"score_spread":0.2630256714237448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288692974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7585459,0.21505505,0.00019441769,0.0048145107,0.00028502702,0.0015563649,0.000021967957,0.000041030944,0.019485751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73814297,0.26107985,0.00016134829,0.00007734408,0.000010244804,0.00006132474,2.4212392e-7,0.0000050713766,0.00046162575],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986205,0.00021927652,0.00040210818,0.0001730056,0.00025854268,0.00032654553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986653,0.00059017143,0.00023923433,0.00027604707,0.00013096065,0.00009828549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001757175,0.00011913068,0.00026516075,0.000023551758,0.00043390327,0.000016483367,0.00036171277,0.000030880183,0.0000527634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032733672,0.000051922612,0.00003896584,0.00039366787,0.0006676128,0.000056936366,0.000102963575,0.000047815785,0.000009560789],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012583298,0.00010208923,0.017521368,0.00088266045,0.00014005342,0.00005890106,0.07809554,1.656701e-7,0.00006124571,0.03769274,0.0009062418,0.8645264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073607074,0.00019136531,0.066339545,0.011135709,0.00018322343,0.000119687546,0.06499288,0.0000027708488,0.000036365305,0.013560156,0.8419649,0.00073730137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012345002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030033584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8637891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010427417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036966414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33372772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291154622","doi":"","title":"Universal Childcare and Longer-Run Effects on Parental Health and Behaviors: Evidence from a Canadian Universal Child Care Program","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology; Depression (economics); Child care; Panel survey; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Demographic economics; Nursing; Economics","score_opus":0.028867207973096626,"score_gpt":0.3342661005509002,"score_spread":0.3053988925778036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291154622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799107,0.0032463775,1.8168298e-7,0.0008721072,0.0005175335,0.0020189357,0.0004771885,0.00006456472,0.012892436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96953905,0.02926328,0.00022626958,0.00011798141,0.0002983631,0.000068451875,0.00030898783,0.000046213572,0.00013138617],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961977,0.0007858675,0.00030534086,0.0011499107,0.0004356869,0.0011255047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710095,0.00038170087,0.00014291628,0.0005645012,0.00019240634,0.0016175355],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010008249,0.00035728916,0.00054172083,0.00051373953,0.00083692785,0.00035517977,0.0006338651,0.0005942463,0.000009644885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033787722,0.00042199605,0.00008410386,0.00018749064,0.000778156,0.0001966164,0.0005765949,0.0016376161,0.00000267029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008969991,0.00009057713,0.62303305,0.00019815109,0.000070226284,0.00013804283,0.11298619,0.00022173677,6.5114506e-7,0.00041737064,0.000085458334,0.26266888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017105704,0.0012216375,0.5267898,0.0028758126,0.00005033643,0.0000062460645,0.44721088,0.000959218,0.000002603562,0.00043394163,0.017472481,0.0012664897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43769282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81194514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37425235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044673393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006394555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291408308","doi":"10.4000/bifea.7651","title":"Género y apropiación de la perspectiva de inversión social en Bolivia: el sistema de los Bonos","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin de l’Institut français d’études andines","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016855988738357384,"score_gpt":0.2885761911493698,"score_spread":0.2717202024110124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291408308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8732313,0.002295563,0.0017423162,0.010460376,0.0009843094,0.00076168677,0.00015050234,0.00035111356,0.11002282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872324,0.0028868124,0.002912755,0.0015173453,0.0035041356,0.00008911794,0.000020075076,0.00009942719,0.0017379494],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945151,0.0012535828,0.00064020924,0.00086517556,0.0009375694,0.0017883352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973974,0.00052661623,0.00032809834,0.0004311446,0.00039968814,0.00091702555],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030076148,0.0007270488,0.00088204304,0.00025763866,0.0017011052,0.00075596524,0.0011248315,0.0012841902,0.0002950927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001400347,0.0007520472,0.00049578724,0.0006572758,0.0018006737,0.00021532453,0.00031656626,0.0008886129,0.00020781686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028671848,0.0012315437,0.5410026,0.0006349887,0.00045295147,0.0003909579,0.13760859,0.0007237756,0.0006175647,0.24544448,0.07088426,0.00072157604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00354915,0.00028299904,0.17091115,0.00035457336,0.0005386936,0.0000976254,0.073838115,0.0012663978,0.00008829495,0.003850364,0.7437605,0.0014621026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022258215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024947047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6728763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016134486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026476406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295495194","doi":"10.1515/bejeap-2015-0059","title":"The Impact of Female Education on Teenage Fertility: Evidence from Turkey","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Demography; Total fertility rate; Compulsory education; Instrumental variable; Population; Margin (machine learning); Variation (astronomy); Demographic economics; Socioeconomics; Geography; Family planning; Economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Research methodology; Econometrics","score_opus":0.06319394215972397,"score_gpt":0.38504129859518854,"score_spread":0.3218473564354646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295495194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912308,0.0010943514,0.00008716559,0.0022863941,0.00017519372,0.00006934912,0.0000117416885,0.0000035797248,0.005041467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99704033,0.0015156807,0.000035116493,0.00010109122,0.0006394644,8.532405e-7,0.0000014290029,0.000005953606,0.000660056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984481,0.00051657995,0.0005149839,0.0000954528,0.00021461019,0.00021027899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977225,0.0006730776,0.0008028848,0.00039083196,0.00022635794,0.0001843468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002786568,0.00010414574,0.0003190001,0.00022143994,0.00026750367,0.000085469226,0.00076726277,0.000055799028,0.000040674346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000680505,0.000056580633,0.00044081436,0.00042222533,0.00025016614,0.00024060954,0.000035865378,0.00015693539,0.00003025536],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005374132,0.00027433617,0.76139414,0.000003483157,0.0040894453,7.918675e-7,0.11401797,0.09782656,0.00014021245,0.008304084,0.006878665,0.0065328632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023749612,0.00018223314,0.91771305,0.000031533287,0.0011028923,0.0000011245179,0.05407843,0.005303442,0.000024907213,0.020509008,0.00066763663,0.00014827414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12419179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044017825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15631886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008053954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029288484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8816403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296467323","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12433","title":"EFFECTS OF WELFARE REFORM ON WOMEN'S VOTING PARTICIPATION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Welfare reform; Welfare; Economics; Incentive; Demographic economics; Turnout; Population; Presidential system; Democracy; Public economics; Labour economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Politics; Demography; Market economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.032354383536765556,"score_gpt":0.31581000280238075,"score_spread":0.2834556192656152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296467323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96982235,0.000008844578,0.000024136292,0.00039355096,0.0027358877,0.00012992574,0.0000030667895,0.000024648622,0.026857609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986575,0.000018837653,0.000031678737,0.00009179018,0.00070439064,0.00002203143,0.0000019479253,0.000008691361,0.00046308187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927706,0.00004580472,0.00016893753,0.00015955884,0.00007300142,0.00027566726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993955,0.000040604413,0.00023066423,0.00023768365,0.000021391526,0.0000741805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047389657,0.00007303789,0.00014218502,0.000037222228,0.0007573498,0.00006680182,0.00026524765,0.00008305918,0.00004875463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014186771,0.00007454301,0.000039997583,0.000014179362,0.00023844825,0.00022751988,0.00004308487,0.000064900436,0.000080078695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000799882,0.0001975632,0.11180384,0.00018720156,0.00010653733,0.00000793,0.21833016,0.00066302763,0.00023326265,0.64291364,0.00052092125,0.02495591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000601177,0.000120893616,0.9648292,0.000034372082,0.000013328795,1.01707705e-7,0.02534562,0.00085592334,0.00030692728,0.001780128,0.0058921077,0.00022021701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011198042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050658436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8530254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005137857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067081426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58249986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296600898","doi":"","title":"Liberalization of Birth Control and the Unmarried Share of Births. Evidence from Single Mothers in the Marriage Market","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Liberalization; Quarter (Canadian coin); Marriage market; Fertility; Abortion; Economics; Birth control; Demographic economics; Pill; Matching (statistics); Family planning; Population; Demography; Medicine; Research methodology; Pregnancy; Geography; Sociology; Biology; Market economy","score_opus":0.03762609019644704,"score_gpt":0.2802943872344406,"score_spread":0.24266829703799359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296600898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94603056,0.00336192,0.0038948767,0.0031136116,0.00060781336,0.0022654315,0.00072641904,0.0000496107,0.039949775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99711686,0.0013067932,0.00028169944,0.00040875492,0.00008404195,0.000030874817,0.000017685188,0.0000140949505,0.0007392006],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705356,0.0014553098,0.0004358012,0.00029064837,0.0005688206,0.00019587933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752414,0.0013125528,0.00040013407,0.0004493205,0.0002601444,0.00005370855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030301763,0.00017360595,0.00042010273,0.00007655419,0.00009080188,0.00010428161,0.00074873294,0.0002495203,0.00022625469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010780133,0.00010183648,0.000087918415,0.00027834714,0.00066289,0.00011568153,0.00016436209,0.00022452617,8.050305e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011285738,0.00027615367,0.3916966,0.00044239714,0.0003211622,0.0000050026792,0.5564704,0.002564719,0.0002991185,0.037039112,0.0076930295,0.0020637158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008470541,0.00018677414,0.38768739,0.0016884102,0.00041416447,7.472579e-7,0.2960114,0.07105012,0.000041191965,0.23027019,0.00308561,0.0010934582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025607493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015660863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.260459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006570259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003534124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9808811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297910813","doi":"10.1108/ijse-07-2014-0134","title":"Religiosity and female labour market attainment in Canada: the Protestant exception","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Sheridan College; Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Protestantism; Redress; Context (archaeology); Originality; Educational attainment; Ideology; Sociology; Demographic economics; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Geography; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.013158465006710874,"score_gpt":0.25013089398917193,"score_spread":0.23697242898246107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297910813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820352,0.00003693646,0.00012798863,0.014850033,0.0007555192,0.000083860505,0.000031835596,0.0000019229685,0.0020767094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732804,0.0013417497,0.000056987552,0.00043648994,0.00052074424,0.0000022391166,3.466577e-7,0.00000453265,0.00030884222],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921614,0.00008816835,0.00029026996,0.00007439073,0.00019833754,0.00013268633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993496,0.00011608716,0.0002765351,0.000033361324,0.00017364226,0.0000507859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077924575,0.000056642682,0.00010479292,0.000042108622,0.00013116772,0.000050700644,0.00026900234,0.000041323456,0.00006461469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010043407,0.000039853254,0.000037743797,0.000033619282,0.00010369123,0.0001770154,0.00003839045,0.00009027206,0.0000011392206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020941376,0.00007019647,0.842052,0.000005361447,0.0001424105,0.000044071046,0.01629128,0.000050321578,0.00010292035,0.10779562,0.0026515564,0.030584874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006488463,0.000022612565,0.94271576,0.000023582943,0.0000066082725,0.000009418389,0.012812537,0.000036469428,0.000007852644,0.014525631,0.029088292,0.000102374506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18659031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7641584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5775681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019046237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013054241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81882626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297979647","doi":"10.1057/9780230232822_13","title":"The Shaping of Motherhood through Social Investment in Children: Examples from Canada and Mexico","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Politics; Hegemony; Investment (military); Political science; State (computer science); Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02722882450662773,"score_gpt":0.2439832411661459,"score_spread":0.21675441665951817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297979647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05467242,0.003961225,0.0000116173915,0.00018909902,0.00024380804,0.00069881545,0.00042195452,0.000030510691,0.9397705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963705,0.0010994981,0.00013851616,0.00093292503,0.0003210596,0.000009332799,0.00004679054,0.000041661973,0.0010397501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786186,0.00011271761,0.00049067236,0.0004316046,0.0006309981,0.00047216724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990059,0.00019008774,0.00033500593,0.0002879787,0.00007414648,0.00010686912],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029640962,0.00036972476,0.00050371134,0.000059798167,0.00055887015,0.000069995804,0.00044862524,0.0003361112,0.000032612694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028533028,0.00031654685,0.00010939601,0.000029389703,0.0005594872,0.0000012483713,0.00009634329,0.00030533993,0.0000012532213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008870564,5.5335965e-7,0.011796052,0.00000636071,0.00013228347,0.0000062668664,0.01357597,0.0000011105355,0.000010613187,0.96795547,0.000022681239,0.006483785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031656795,0.000024082068,0.0875759,0.00006235946,0.000048934246,6.6746384e-7,0.0028431632,0.000004675825,0.000006633835,0.90711147,0.0016541076,0.00035145978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7407197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9451786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.941698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026892414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081827585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W229896902","doi":"","title":"T he impact of child care costs and availability on mothers' labour supply","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Poverty; Child care; Labour economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Business; Economic growth; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.028158361435329314,"score_gpt":0.344597170756556,"score_spread":0.3164388093212267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W229896902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83688897,0.00036710966,2.2552179e-7,0.00028168337,0.00026153008,0.0008160152,0.0006217954,0.000024584871,0.1607381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986295,0.012126577,0.00008892785,0.0000556423,0.0002027488,0.0000442325,0.00005887733,0.000042029245,0.0010859531],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966541,0.000765271,0.00048635292,0.00082708214,0.00047018164,0.0007969932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759144,0.00043115046,0.00019301295,0.00090930297,0.00046790973,0.00040719184],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031957645,0.00029377782,0.00059098314,0.00032781635,0.0002745319,0.00014732529,0.0007438437,0.0006372491,0.0001163182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009903525,0.00029395067,0.0001973722,0.00018000527,0.0009921722,0.000090660345,0.00057559693,0.0014086692,0.0000073307865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022956512,0.0002732713,0.89568704,0.00028069588,0.0001955468,0.000010502546,0.041153483,0.006046997,0.000013391995,0.0022121123,0.00032683063,0.053570546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016156692,0.00062560133,0.8722462,0.00045023797,0.000024298768,0.0000024049173,0.10284332,0.0014602434,0.000015882828,0.005290115,0.014477953,0.0009480804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01072438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013918863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15965214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034496689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023078746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300049803","doi":"10.14288/1.0055583","title":"The women-in-development efficiency approach : a case study of programming income generation in a Chinese village","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rural development; Economic growth; Business; Economics; Geography; Agriculture","score_opus":0.011654914993429476,"score_gpt":0.21623830131184205,"score_spread":0.20458338631841258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300049803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983029,0.000057155037,0.00010995337,0.000014334483,0.000046128367,0.00062777713,0.0000026815355,0.000018075429,0.00082099106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952275,0.00003547056,0.0002971216,0.000005731656,0.000013733821,0.0000023433793,0.0000022704337,0.0000035928356,0.000117018804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875635,0.0001742504,0.00018211004,0.00024144081,0.00031716315,0.00032869072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995381,0.000031598393,0.000108157146,0.00014526553,0.00010158742,0.00007528671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010924801,0.00003928092,0.00019361191,0.00007159234,0.00056634453,0.00008233868,0.0002698028,0.00006610666,0.0000026446291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004722707,0.00009489975,0.00003129665,0.0009146582,0.00015489162,0.00016116603,0.00005155787,0.000097560354,3.8084903e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071567106,0.0015750781,0.4678013,0.000020608304,0.000012601301,0.0005826754,0.23681195,0.00024113749,0.000029852647,0.000007658713,0.000005917555,0.29290408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006511869,0.00008748844,0.7302236,0.000008590707,0.0000026723103,0.000013282847,0.26814827,0.0007317645,1.1451571e-8,0.000041503023,0.000015124854,0.00007653672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18996239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8832666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69330424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002761059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020876639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8154317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301131661","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2029591","title":"Le Financement des Services de Garde des Enfants: Effets sur le Travail, le Revenu des Familles, et les Finances Publiques (Public Funding of Child Care: Effects on Family Incomes, Female Labor Market Participation and Provincial and Federal Public Finances)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Child care; Humanities; Economics; Welfare economics; Nursing; Medicine; Art","score_opus":0.01573480066720864,"score_gpt":0.26523956726854914,"score_spread":0.2495047666013405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301131661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9485247,0.047690537,0.00094413257,0.00068016705,0.00012912837,0.0003641619,0.000024678215,0.000043486678,0.001599018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95635635,0.042524632,0.0004438293,0.00018061121,0.0002067754,0.000050838953,0.00001304345,0.000031648688,0.00019226967],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99557877,0.0009524565,0.00041443968,0.0003268502,0.00041311237,0.002314371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987443,0.00020648165,0.00036920048,0.00014301919,0.00030444772,0.00023252217],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003563897,0.00029424837,0.0004020514,0.00017605667,0.002430528,0.00038961272,0.0003137421,0.00019815794,0.0000015338735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036273774,0.00028302034,0.00008498783,0.00034189376,0.0005902094,0.0016579964,0.000081694954,0.0006778816,4.155539e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009331779,0.00032085238,0.7648666,0.00038547022,0.000096013726,0.0000016867322,0.024812318,0.000009680491,0.0002058999,0.087640174,0.00003805229,0.12152997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014784731,0.00053412543,0.94417274,0.00030986563,0.000034329947,0.000016398197,0.035591733,0.000052950207,0.00016510433,0.013633503,0.003654226,0.00035656863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013532473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15952498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17930616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005991116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042165187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305299259","doi":"10.7202/1043294ar","title":"L’égalité, l’indépendance et l’union de fait : le choix de l’union de fait et du mariage au Québec et en Ontario de 1986 à 2011","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010339031313469702,"score_gpt":0.24316413480161775,"score_spread":0.23282510348814806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305299259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8992055,0.003323997,0.026007634,0.032684803,0.0018178917,0.0006648782,0.00022497607,0.00029457166,0.03577575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9535564,0.008300962,0.0078160055,0.013200715,0.0011663395,0.0001138708,0.0001236413,0.00018732237,0.01553473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98978865,0.004364801,0.0008510182,0.0011856179,0.0007893057,0.0030205958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960291,0.0006716172,0.00053873734,0.0009881074,0.00036922673,0.001403224],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009195668,0.00090491486,0.00081368996,0.0006333504,0.0019645588,0.00037789487,0.0015932367,0.0018290726,0.00044574097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064349617,0.0010855047,0.00071915705,0.0016366671,0.0038695233,0.0010010316,0.00023756833,0.0022217708,0.000100635094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008419939,0.0004468519,0.5164512,0.000097168326,0.0002836138,0.00011183808,0.31117046,0.00017566972,0.0009457588,0.14940724,0.018688608,0.002137412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011780146,0.0003216937,0.6359847,0.000161895,0.00027776416,0.00010054939,0.03140491,0.0005089153,0.0001318568,0.010968266,0.31788847,0.0010729302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.989141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99811864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29919985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008198181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026551241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305384592","doi":"10.14288/1.0084605","title":"Creating an educational tool : the implication of a new infant feeding policy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Infant feeding; Breastfeeding; Medicine; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.02207139888568404,"score_gpt":0.23711888053674277,"score_spread":0.21504748165105872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305384592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97490394,0.00002788055,0.00031124766,0.00028124364,0.000069001384,0.00015182386,0.000033061064,0.000020361678,0.024201423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974517,0.00008650214,0.0012360144,0.00004063553,0.000120619945,3.407116e-7,0.000008069083,0.0000047246967,0.0010513578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993224,0.0000562051,0.00009654666,0.00015810583,0.00020305841,0.00016364623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993486,0.000044666238,0.00014364325,0.00016382433,0.00021070088,0.00008856823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028235622,0.000023623319,0.00010133943,0.000034886278,0.0005294575,0.000048042897,0.0003655579,0.00006504675,0.00013280642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010290981,0.000067044435,0.00005560289,0.0003685595,0.00028633449,0.0003505042,0.000052065847,0.00006228867,0.000003127049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006831206,0.00019097504,0.5717048,0.000025664365,0.000038656948,0.0000017322465,0.112965815,0.000004809937,0.0005160352,0.0055421614,0.0011803708,0.30782214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015633197,0.000024665584,0.9457525,0.000022871056,0.000016184418,0.0000025177533,0.048375394,0.00004354928,3.1473556e-7,0.005396238,0.00013960982,0.000069793175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8252468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5156181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37404773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007743045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007327859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49322063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2311247204","doi":"10.1177/0192513x15623588","title":"Who Is in Charge of Family Finances in the Russian Two-Earner Households?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Demographic economics; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Poverty; Inequality; Welfare; Power (physics); Economic growth; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.08289022387858046,"score_gpt":0.3515927506502222,"score_spread":0.26870252677164175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2311247204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9621181,0.007625139,0.000020157178,0.0028580918,0.0005312315,0.00014804164,0.000011594841,0.000008618686,0.026679061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918025,0.0054837056,0.00036588116,0.0012259409,0.00043179953,0.0000025905201,6.8353955e-7,0.000014388196,0.00067247055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972766,0.00044473208,0.00072256115,0.00016085367,0.0009877129,0.00040750965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888885,0.00012759477,0.00046914295,0.00021915692,0.00017226119,0.00012300817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003112202,0.00016563306,0.00048642315,0.0002342778,0.00009588555,0.00008564266,0.00079533627,0.00014160572,0.000010516562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017843189,0.000115392686,0.00013417525,0.0007970442,0.000256975,0.00046185925,0.00003727308,0.0004077077,0.0000120961895],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009620623,0.00042968336,0.6325242,0.000028355322,0.00004031307,0.00013736314,0.32094052,0.00017765703,0.00043016503,0.023706459,0.019365836,0.002123278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014276443,0.00025528093,0.75242597,0.00020281938,0.000022596481,0.0000049618984,0.15712348,0.00009076771,0.000035111978,0.008348979,0.07983477,0.00022763676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051213587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014385765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16381705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010834791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044382253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7741996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314849528","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2012.03.742","title":"PGI15 The Economic Burden of Unmet Treatment Needs in Medicaid Patients with Chronic Constipation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Value in Health","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Constipation; Fecal impaction; Medicaid; Medical prescription; Chronic constipation; Adverse effect; Emergency medicine; Health care; Intensive care medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.03085724378491901,"score_gpt":0.29887209967741946,"score_spread":0.26801485589250046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314849528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99635017,0.0007220564,0.000019785703,0.00084191,0.0003286009,0.0004908977,0.000018033266,0.000008441504,0.0012201045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998658,0.0009680572,0.00008557027,0.00006729242,0.00014180267,0.000020113444,0.000012668894,0.0000058542846,0.000040625808],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987996,0.00033504685,0.00027134275,0.000088091285,0.00017460602,0.0003312834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994528,0.00016158957,0.00014517613,0.00012821282,0.000018123223,0.000094069845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092492445,0.000072080664,0.00016022903,0.00010381503,0.000100739664,0.000006888389,0.00010826108,0.00005273749,0.000021799386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027288535,0.000049805374,0.00001791489,0.0002293912,0.00016125922,0.000094964824,0.00001052689,0.000067289046,0.000007436095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012432735,0.00008305857,0.90033865,0.000017607046,0.000007369498,9.054617e-8,0.07345592,0.0070319003,2.9789013e-7,0.015250311,0.00002380123,0.003778572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023681766,0.0006761387,0.9543709,0.000108637185,0.000012200784,2.3551574e-7,0.029467646,0.004729279,0.0000019192878,0.000690496,0.0074102534,0.0001641081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15014204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02010368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13003837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018545722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013668496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99777687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315521518","doi":"10.1177/084387140301500271","title":"Book Review: Set Adrift: Fishing Families","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Maritime History","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Fishing; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.019487371575347516,"score_gpt":0.27553781539242983,"score_spread":0.2560504438170823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315521518","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003275439,0.62479395,0.0010162939,0.00820693,0.0118628265,0.00017069392,0.00002805315,0.000038471353,0.35060734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07965414,0.5732983,0.00443966,0.15619329,0.0033133558,0.000013485044,0.000035826757,0.00008065111,0.1829713],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980941,0.0002638119,0.00044462192,0.00011197344,0.00090432714,0.0001811588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855906,0.00013314905,0.00035161542,0.000094977775,0.00073451333,0.00012669916],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001214039,0.00010035112,0.00020102804,0.00016620773,0.0001090847,0.000035230252,0.0005433597,0.00007808088,0.0035215649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008106581,0.00010432507,0.00017684123,0.00006479117,0.00017963185,0.000507181,0.0000242621,0.00027799996,0.00004637538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008067306,0.000044905933,0.0017023325,0.00002001519,0.0000601709,0.000079282145,0.0032507402,0.000009039202,0.000019968598,0.0052265762,0.9887514,0.00082751666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023290407,0.000021121496,0.0014875265,0.00024393178,0.000026068494,0.000044061206,0.0010347991,0.000006949296,0.0000021936683,0.0004383871,0.9963523,0.00010975383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002013931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001249709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16763604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010678845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070756604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315952069","doi":"10.1016/s0037-6337(11)70527-7","title":"Practice Costs in U.S. Quadruple Those in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Skin & Allergy News","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.0307490898735801,"score_gpt":0.2789253991223543,"score_spread":0.2481763092487742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315952069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6400205,0.0003734473,0.000029981033,0.0009300798,0.0008162287,0.00022069136,0.0000057639163,0.000023200215,0.35758013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950503,0.0013027028,0.00095908216,0.0015097104,0.00009004208,0.000021600557,0.0000055517758,0.000015022791,0.0010459563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982731,0.0003247043,0.0002754285,0.0002684938,0.00035536528,0.0005029075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992919,0.0001679693,0.00009759755,0.00022739216,0.00006958552,0.00014558065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005203515,0.00012396883,0.00017222684,0.00008381649,0.00010914624,0.000024711579,0.00035348246,0.00010108407,0.0002229216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033794736,0.0001321803,0.000029231256,0.00049786025,0.00006249318,0.00026035926,0.0000488942,0.0002185798,0.000028790068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016043488,0.00066176825,0.590418,0.000013917861,0.00007109499,0.00064437825,0.25530556,0.00028933978,0.000026597947,0.10374707,0.017107202,0.031554658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061074743,0.00002419143,0.4020434,0.000024638643,0.0000043000205,0.0000017191074,0.20311442,0.00015681947,0.0000076453825,0.0013815671,0.39229777,0.00033277558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99860775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99992317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37519056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009859098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025606516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53901565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318032586","doi":"10.2307/3504790","title":"10.2307/3504790","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Social justice; Equal opportunity; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Politics; Law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.010832453624672117,"score_gpt":0.22466384077990872,"score_spread":0.2138313871552366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318032586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013275526,0.000039912695,0.0000020239984,0.0004502614,0.000010342734,0.000132261,0.000011863824,0.00013396135,0.98594385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036033522,0.000003744448,0.00013653397,0.00019572255,0.00022754564,0.000006918833,0.0000065849235,0.000011664912,0.99580795],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908257,0.00006589421,0.000107435786,0.00017111676,0.0002481576,0.00032484275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995422,0.000038252296,0.000016112439,0.00017202452,0.00005001892,0.00018139626],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023185131,0.00008323195,0.00010369118,0.000039375802,0.00027051105,0.00006062172,0.00025320402,0.000076198,0.9735675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040877585,0.000086334454,0.000044668508,0.00029828952,0.00007534737,0.00008918806,0.000018491748,0.00006353234,0.9489284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027066646,0.000087588276,0.00003128406,0.0000037523926,0.000018815197,0.000008056199,0.0030556093,0.00014308219,0.00002111678,0.0003192321,0.21127938,0.78500503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087082175,0.000033541284,0.0007409756,0.0000033828853,0.000007160162,3.811574e-7,0.0001090558,0.000067563255,9.0241076e-7,0.00007564102,0.99874955,0.0001247461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054495584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001616671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7874702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005194226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008912198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3520617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318648079","doi":"10.1016/s1499-2671(11)52284-1","title":"Food taxes: Too easy a solution","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Diabetes","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Subsidy; Multidisciplinary approach; Public economics; Consumption (sociology); Perspective (graphical); Public health; Obesity; Population; Environmental health; Economics","score_opus":0.033881024810866994,"score_gpt":0.22782925963621808,"score_spread":0.1939482348253511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318648079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96903104,0.000990345,0.000100223486,0.00027222664,0.0010650927,0.00006089418,0.000032495594,0.0000075225894,0.02844016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844736,0.000022444905,0.00043703328,0.00037804167,0.00029827422,0.0000010943436,9.3297933e-7,0.000009056088,0.00040574084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898154,0.000093217845,0.00021199309,0.0000776186,0.00017540723,0.00046020414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987614,0.00003242796,0.00014678124,0.00008906184,0.0002458434,0.0007244407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052643986,0.00007826052,0.00014197997,0.00018685752,0.00035294108,0.00005993551,0.00029806243,0.00009508174,0.00017458122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024747904,0.00007703982,0.00009394421,0.00021427713,0.00021157063,0.00025211892,0.0000052950018,0.00014546365,0.000017308139],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013540297,0.000023951205,0.91769516,0.000009922099,0.0000860179,0.000010581475,0.041276634,0.0000034178177,0.000050177656,0.032753687,0.0054562264,0.00263287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006145038,0.00079413597,0.8536993,0.000097884345,0.00010339659,0.0000025401262,0.0335103,0.000071392504,0.000081320344,0.031126218,0.079437435,0.000461558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00786897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2190435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21117452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017420054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017755933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319170551","doi":"10.3406/oss.2010.1415","title":"L’évolution de la fécondité et la politique familiale québécoise","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Santé Société et Solidarité","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.01342617277025966,"score_gpt":0.34177207489683326,"score_spread":0.3283459021265736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319170551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46098784,0.000709717,0.00075517455,0.0035078104,0.004085025,0.00029908578,0.00029011103,0.0001966364,0.5291686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97296435,0.0056933626,0.0017513342,0.004189235,0.002151889,0.00005315607,0.0000664871,0.00010079417,0.013029415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993759,0.0029590053,0.0005620621,0.00067867886,0.0006420755,0.0013992287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641335,0.0018845354,0.00028578736,0.00056689046,0.00027670726,0.00057271536],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040157335,0.00052119006,0.0005520451,0.00013394425,0.00084181805,0.0004158131,0.0007120503,0.0017324712,0.00061527226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009864155,0.00060798775,0.00042628174,0.0005695575,0.0031408875,0.00064979907,0.00017362491,0.0022059272,0.00016948255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014908555,0.00044454623,0.04287753,0.00007923464,0.00009272995,0.000048476362,0.03536579,0.00002757457,0.0017096481,0.9061477,0.0023850305,0.010806812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009652312,0.00007200215,0.17838243,0.000076715885,0.00016226241,0.00005729582,0.032980014,0.00081232557,0.000054834614,0.2845464,0.5010607,0.0008297472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06220095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07182933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6216013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040780884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029615578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321349548","doi":"","title":"Has the potential for compensating poverty by womens employment growth been depleted","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Demographic economics; Economics; Poverty reduction; Poverty rate; Developing country; Percentage point; Development economics; Labour economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.024543582111299457,"score_gpt":0.26131597077089364,"score_spread":0.23677238865959419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321349548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93188536,0.0015539266,0.01232356,0.008570248,0.011479465,0.0031842336,0.003492141,0.00047916587,0.027031876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98970735,0.00032100387,0.0010946456,0.00218884,0.0018882984,0.00045451475,0.00023740002,0.0001213974,0.003986551],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99529135,0.0005380735,0.00095587963,0.0011692184,0.0007197897,0.0013256752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662346,0.00080900715,0.00083935226,0.0008560105,0.00045279766,0.00041935782],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017248306,0.00068302406,0.0008742907,0.00017437943,0.0024074682,0.00055109366,0.0014873854,0.00078325224,0.000468143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004159866,0.0005417897,0.00060907326,0.00016670211,0.0014850867,0.00021768046,0.0006187723,0.0007700449,0.00010579872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085168096,0.00031039963,0.79014146,0.00015600224,0.00093417545,0.000014758392,0.015908007,0.000040088213,0.0005909207,0.032262124,0.1585505,0.0010063848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009755122,0.00064150046,0.30593824,0.0010551568,0.0015449526,0.000056559504,0.04775301,0.0033144155,0.00025126617,0.11454701,0.5068479,0.008294832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00179403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021990696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48420322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001192415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018825323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324522610","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdw010","title":"Towards a Micro-Founded Theory of Aggregate Labour Supply","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Labour supply; Aggregate supply; Salient; Wage; Margin (machine learning); Elasticity (physics); Labour economics; Price elasticity of supply; Shock (circulatory); Aggregate (composite); Supply side; Aggregate demand; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Price elasticity of demand","score_opus":0.04593733608731544,"score_gpt":0.32577241139761753,"score_spread":0.2798350753103021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324522610","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48206952,0.49462414,0.000025603753,0.0062822793,0.0006572082,0.0005044456,0.000097488824,0.000022373819,0.015716944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34133485,0.6561874,0.00009641471,0.00037136697,0.00009306504,0.000015153507,3.7736098e-7,0.000006902048,0.0018944162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987581,0.00035475494,0.00043246697,0.0001492406,0.00009145028,0.00021399457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863654,0.0005350245,0.00036563212,0.0002994792,0.00013154806,0.00003176821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025096221,0.00011732026,0.00054435903,0.000027378797,0.00015149625,0.000005634606,0.00041903218,0.00003564655,0.0001598701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048248822,0.00006133592,0.00016968856,0.000080899394,0.0008654129,0.00007340082,0.00011203166,0.00004164992,0.000059308495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024742187,0.000042535696,0.008646647,0.0027459464,0.00080836733,7.532897e-7,0.019090243,6.9468854e-7,0.00026824692,0.87995803,0.0044042855,0.08400948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017687896,0.00029250013,0.05897401,0.021408513,0.000861547,0.000005607044,0.08274002,0.000001640439,0.000939176,0.5702134,0.26183116,0.0009636377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022344652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030697612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30974466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011530685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001981491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31886497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324622053","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2014.07.675","title":"MID LIFE MEN AND WOMEN’S RECOVERY WORK FOLLOWING A FIRST MI: ARE THEIR NEEDS BEING MET?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Providence Health Care; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Observational study; CLARITY; Nursing; Qualitative research; Family medicine; Health professionals; Secondary prevention; Health care; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.012649114751109677,"score_gpt":0.21219691978563426,"score_spread":0.19954780503452457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324622053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9682593,0.0010345419,0.0008388067,0.001441953,0.0018352227,0.000060447637,0.0000075288563,0.00000733276,0.026514912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732536,0.00026755218,0.00010845079,0.000672787,0.0014168824,0.0000032935804,8.843012e-7,0.0000139163885,0.00019089627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851364,0.00037811825,0.0002692383,0.000121119185,0.00013869848,0.0005791675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831825,0.00027792112,0.00017036227,0.00012528169,0.00011447453,0.0009937127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001741071,0.000121537545,0.0004640486,0.00030136635,0.000528369,0.000095384145,0.00029337246,0.00019270396,0.000012290401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081513904,0.000113476955,0.00018669941,0.00029006624,0.00019677004,0.0001413697,0.000016472954,0.00024367803,0.0000028112208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023361024,0.0000014075678,0.92886674,0.000011437662,0.0004724036,0.00007568424,0.05570503,0.001165495,0.00001200111,0.001347148,0.007913598,0.004405707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008313508,0.00024356417,0.25312248,0.000109448694,0.000113168426,0.00004471628,0.1945695,0.0000139695185,0.0000018523971,0.009361748,0.5411882,0.0003999928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020411299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01113961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67574424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003320212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094102847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62161636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331644085","doi":"10.1080/07053436.2006.10707714","title":"Gender Convergence and Life-course Differentiation in the Canadian Use of Time","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Life course approach; Unpaid work; Work (physics); Division of labour; Perspective (graphical); Convergence (economics); Sociology; Equity (law); Distribution (mathematics); Time-use survey; Demographic economics; Family life; Psychology; Gender studies; Economics; Social psychology; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.027390911380248913,"score_gpt":0.28251497343945864,"score_spread":0.25512406205920973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331644085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958578,0.0005663182,0.000072576215,0.0015138515,0.0001117931,0.0002159351,0.000045863937,0.000014984401,0.0016009195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997548,0.00088071387,0.00012563718,0.00091987295,0.00009319204,0.0000061942906,0.000030345713,0.000008079727,0.000388003],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988863,0.00020838519,0.00017081187,0.00018370978,0.0002714952,0.0002793311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942935,0.00020060329,0.00007858287,0.00011106556,0.00007925121,0.000101169855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006299323,0.0001110735,0.00016432712,0.000018233564,0.0004846022,0.00011667035,0.0001201978,0.00023444051,0.00004793278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035103545,0.000092997936,0.000079282065,0.00020209624,0.00034423245,0.00021744762,0.000018471876,0.00020191826,0.000002037398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032900175,0.00007179641,0.8479755,0.000032158277,0.00004638037,0.0000014044913,0.0787264,0.00009793554,0.00006818929,0.06955213,0.0032135884,0.00021123001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028681994,0.000010237055,0.96058226,0.0000070356014,0.00004063941,3.567004e-7,0.030290464,0.0008920972,0.0000012875336,0.0026302577,0.005124269,0.00013426803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19581932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38418266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18836333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051473813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039223203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8095358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W233315158","doi":"","title":"Session 4: New Policies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic policy review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare reform; Legislation; Entitlement (fair division); Aid to Families with Dependent Children; Incentive; Earnings; Receipt; Welfare; Social Security Act; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Federal funds; Block grant; Financial independence; Economics; Public administration; Public economics; Political science; Finance; Law; Accounting; Social security","score_opus":0.08659681573402572,"score_gpt":0.36428518927808773,"score_spread":0.277688373544062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W233315158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3159797,0.1655406,0.00015616,0.08664427,0.0011199047,0.001663077,0.00007418178,0.00024725997,0.42857486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21348932,0.62999564,0.0010298033,0.01299535,0.005494757,0.00002312185,0.000048957638,0.00008426148,0.13683878],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763775,0.00023825058,0.00075960124,0.0003677018,0.0002555434,0.0007411682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982971,0.00012753348,0.0003922265,0.0005271898,0.00005497076,0.0006010087],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073133304,0.0002658531,0.0007238827,0.00015136153,0.0003923732,0.00012608411,0.00082748226,0.00017114161,0.0009804538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004722585,0.0002538277,0.00033210884,0.00044986024,0.00015713961,0.00032501598,0.00014091628,0.00017899627,0.00035108379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003991661,0.00007671749,0.04348819,0.0006794947,0.0001065391,0.0000055654464,0.005706537,0.000071563656,0.000037735677,0.14172018,0.7433298,0.064737745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000420212,0.000054751035,0.016809609,0.0010398705,0.000029609737,0.000004880455,0.0005764278,0.000027666563,0.000004889933,0.012031904,0.96869147,0.00030872205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18834004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022203399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46445504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046889408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030663644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336713223","doi":"","title":"The United States in Comparative Perspective: Maternity and Parental Leave and Child Care Benefits Trends in Liberal Welfare States","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parental leave; Welfare state; Welfare; Political science; Welfare reform; Economic growth; Politics; Economics; Law; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.01789219897395435,"score_gpt":0.29928233232603135,"score_spread":0.281390133352077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336713223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98469007,0.0010525581,8.361656e-7,0.00293443,0.0000432054,0.00013932437,0.00007798648,0.000031767835,0.011029842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793804,0.0014865671,0.000024712377,0.00016541315,0.000019122916,0.000004206777,0.0000801924,0.0000044532917,0.0002772917],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989873,0.00016150661,0.00014960332,0.00022711333,0.0001615919,0.00031285972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996626,0.000058298745,0.000037086305,0.000072803065,0.000086009146,0.00008325433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014767823,0.00013547417,0.0001625088,0.00015452712,0.000553292,0.00016364575,0.00010817621,0.00006259995,0.000013799274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000088349925,0.000099745725,0.000017482194,0.00047379607,0.00025154153,0.00012511882,0.000033785385,0.00016648309,5.513736e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004097299,0.000059550675,0.5973881,0.0000032870814,0.000009512264,0.000004181068,0.36958185,0.00048772618,6.3703027e-7,0.029912166,0.000050023576,0.0024619678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028706237,0.000047920792,0.5746818,0.000008108323,0.0000024015987,4.8992575e-7,0.4229135,0.0005932872,0.0000019007073,0.0011753369,0.00020283235,0.00008531871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023363419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19545148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17208807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014049247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016960805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9831401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339821599","doi":"","title":"The Cost of Raising Children","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Consumption (sociology); Cash; Economic cost; Opportunity cost; Economics; Public economics; Actuarial science; Cost–benefit analysis; Business; Political science; Engineering; Finance; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.009906372701641495,"score_gpt":0.26122943799901016,"score_spread":0.25132306529736864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339821599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803477,0.002798788,0.004174772,0.0017123346,0.0003359959,0.00024673998,0.0000012038224,0.00001868534,0.010363772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881035,0.00960086,0.000027176931,0.00006338412,0.00030741064,0.0000028993468,7.47355e-7,0.000008671082,0.0018853197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977316,0.00015186613,0.00019401008,0.00008079335,0.00031268477,0.0015290428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943346,0.00008739921,0.00014143945,0.000108150656,0.00015585005,0.000073687654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001919396,0.00007033139,0.000093663846,0.000033915083,0.0010069151,0.000117736345,0.00039140895,0.000057588433,0.00002899108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000115158575,0.000048664562,0.00007784572,0.00017997842,0.00019849472,0.00016873033,0.00002052522,0.00074084394,0.00002783561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074433356,0.00004382198,0.13394475,0.0000010855348,0.00015535769,2.39606e-7,0.004784527,0.000040415594,0.00019270871,0.7657262,0.000601354,0.094502054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005360208,0.00011904418,0.20108326,0.0000125468005,0.000033438315,0.00004572054,0.04813718,0.00007805748,0.000014531664,0.7442834,0.005452957,0.00020386152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002084777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060807415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09429819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035719344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001902501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7744479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398700141","doi":"","title":"Stable Marriage with General Preferences - Extended Abstract.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02244730357105366,"score_gpt":0.2655929723225525,"score_spread":0.24314566875149887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398700141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5364395,0.0000151759905,0.0015591843,0.00013524859,0.0001713605,0.00009285924,0.000003544376,0.00008953498,0.4614936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96424943,0.000060888542,0.00416843,0.00029028134,0.00025254584,0.000009315688,0.000006288055,0.000009648647,0.030953191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988085,0.000076520184,0.00012943447,0.00023053071,0.00036761042,0.00038737623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945897,0.000061974984,0.000053675813,0.00018401617,0.00009106136,0.00015028504],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047190854,0.00010933545,0.00013135043,0.000035885892,0.00035801943,0.00013747654,0.00024803475,0.00008679878,0.0009663789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003905316,0.000079829486,0.000028328584,0.00016251908,0.00016633872,0.0002218693,0.000022093715,0.00009422837,0.000067925575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004313649,0.00020219639,0.17308469,0.000030311685,0.000068631925,0.0000066784555,0.014350423,0.000264878,0.00065696856,0.7900607,0.0066095293,0.0146218585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007874212,0.00020714533,0.82224053,0.000017255123,0.000034592424,0.0000011728962,0.019283656,0.0011581839,0.00011957051,0.034695096,0.120821185,0.00063416734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005273894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015761968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7553656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003309184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015640457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399738956","doi":"","title":"Common cent$ 4: balanced budgets, deficits, and the price of liberty.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Manitoba Health","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.02126336336589855,"score_gpt":0.2213677079946164,"score_spread":0.20010434462871785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399738956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77217484,0.00405803,0.000055086526,0.0032054272,0.00040842374,0.0008041307,0.000013086486,0.000059376773,0.21922164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994189,0.0029773477,0.00005237697,0.00036725026,0.00007118583,0.00010176229,0.0000011169305,0.0000066553916,0.0022332727],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990126,0.00015413399,0.0001521057,0.00012595873,0.00022960687,0.00032561988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994251,0.00020356546,0.00008306222,0.00015303803,0.00004749302,0.00008770844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056161394,0.000071363065,0.00015625327,0.000024892915,0.00022491533,0.00003928591,0.00021279398,0.00006356156,0.000017203012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014950066,0.00005046186,0.000039378236,0.00022575703,0.00036612136,0.00007461955,0.000041670355,0.00008544671,0.000004094977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105047446,0.000364012,0.3918651,0.0000901811,0.00013705154,0.0000053634258,0.09789325,0.000032063166,0.000017466768,0.28117537,0.012509829,0.21580525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011271784,0.000006131791,0.9465401,0.000004410248,0.000029869752,8.863423e-7,0.005387379,0.00043836195,0.0000072792645,0.0027309237,0.043583456,0.0001440233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000759952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000502654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.554675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026904738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010218695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20577748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2401671146","doi":"10.55016/ojs/ajer.v61i4.55948","title":"Mere Equals: The Paradox of Educated Women in the Early Republic (2012) by Lucia McMahon","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Journal of Educational Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.07381095793063831,"score_gpt":0.4002339760662313,"score_spread":0.326423018135593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2401671146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88722813,0.0010221729,0.0000025724544,0.08364998,0.0003315007,0.0001812153,0.0000064375954,4.04136e-7,0.027577573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575555,0.0009941342,0.000013158343,0.00020515239,0.00041773976,0.000027636526,0.0000019568165,0.000009685301,0.04077507],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955984,0.0016340021,0.0005101183,0.00015644502,0.001440623,0.0006604297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771802,0.020986194,0.00027544767,0.00030427703,0.0010480826,0.0002058186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008827131,0.00009181343,0.0001806908,0.0002411845,0.00042289973,0.000116648866,0.0013555203,0.00009135761,0.0037561157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013870029,0.00004528792,0.00007936448,0.0011121114,0.0006607616,0.00045403148,0.000049899714,0.00042569253,0.00006254526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001524625,0.0012873779,0.36551315,0.000020804802,0.00015111014,8.216452e-7,0.20015787,0.0000033375215,0.0011082211,0.17743473,0.24967101,0.0044991155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005956778,0.0002950181,0.65043217,0.000112519294,0.00001488197,0.0000124912995,0.11375979,0.000003007464,0.000031520703,0.034578227,0.19999428,0.00017038953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009011638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053072665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28491905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003782741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003662071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99758744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2419073769","doi":"","title":"Heterogeneity in the Gender Wage Gap in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Glass ceiling; Salary; Earnings; Wage; Gender pay gap; Demographic economics; Distribution (mathematics); Marital status; Economics; Census; Labour economics; Full-time; Demography; Sociology; Population; Economic growth","score_opus":0.06985710722382353,"score_gpt":0.33927229807720233,"score_spread":0.2694151908533788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2419073769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8091055,0.00015717608,0.0000014720367,0.00088288344,0.0005820097,0.00072434614,0.000089892674,0.000009656108,0.18844707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884655,0.010155075,0.000046262052,0.00033003467,0.0002300514,0.00017257313,0.000018532359,0.000031092983,0.0005509186],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950806,0.0015463452,0.0006209779,0.00082112633,0.00060450693,0.0013264295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977817,0.0008798998,0.00013183379,0.000937238,0.000083431354,0.00018590715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005432375,0.00026374267,0.0004373625,0.00034102972,0.0002443219,0.00014714569,0.0016934193,0.00042292505,0.00005922949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004923287,0.0002221016,0.00010598646,0.0002612664,0.00040173478,0.000096106516,0.0006524488,0.0016957797,0.0000066336806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003547677,0.00012470421,0.9471419,0.00007665188,0.00004217497,0.00017848407,0.015861047,0.0033439002,0.000014183348,0.0051793763,0.0002274819,0.027774613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088603445,0.000023587043,0.88705045,0.00015643283,0.0000054588245,0.0000028328393,0.064688474,0.001858515,0.000006621737,0.015972607,0.028551903,0.0007971002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7734641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22297399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006439274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00895251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99737483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463027398","doi":"10.1155/2016/8717265","title":"Distributive Implications of Fertility Changes in Latin America","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Population Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad Nacional de La Plata; International Development Research Centre; American Association of Equine Practitioners Foundation","keywords":"Fertility; Microdata (statistics); Latin Americans; Total fertility rate; Economics; Inequality; Poverty; Demographic economics; Income distribution; Per capita; Development economics; Demography; Population; Economic growth; Political science; Family planning; Research methodology; Sociology; Census","score_opus":0.11619357237109942,"score_gpt":0.45948580402320416,"score_spread":0.34329223165210476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2463027398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97892934,0.00003503474,0.0023623195,0.016546838,0.00024254539,0.000103637976,0.00008188778,0.0000043496498,0.001694031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990679,0.00020920532,0.00028846704,0.000028158802,0.00015266861,0.000003938651,0.00001030953,0.0000037630089,0.0002355945],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803585,0.0003607463,0.00036186713,0.00009429702,0.0009662426,0.00018098035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721193,0.00047445687,0.00024022543,0.000088048706,0.0019094747,0.000075876655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016129456,0.000044237528,0.000114942086,0.000372749,0.00008375068,0.000026618416,0.00042348652,0.000053957523,0.00014701248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016696734,0.00003331073,0.000048698257,0.0004049287,0.00021141583,0.00018540109,0.000050811475,0.00014265043,0.000005092429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005817163,0.0000951276,0.9562044,0.000001867155,0.000019943453,0.0000022825068,0.0020064595,0.000022416025,0.0016031278,0.01779464,0.00017592232,0.022015603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025367585,0.000038240712,0.9777138,0.000041106407,0.0000017274692,5.783123e-7,0.0019356845,0.00003047385,0.00006514104,0.017816858,0.0020681904,0.00003451197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023120448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043980135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021981092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044353903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018237618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34951356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463845097","doi":"10.1057/9781137569622_5","title":"The Great Transformation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Quarter (Canadian coin); Ringing; Meteorology; Geography; Engineering; Telecommunications; Political science; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.021926431622167262,"score_gpt":0.2523546503835725,"score_spread":0.23042821876140526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2463845097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021068605,0.00058290386,0.00029556124,0.00032570225,0.00097226875,0.0006285709,0.00014548512,0.00015254474,0.9966863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5712148,0.0029736906,0.00003454301,0.00035003788,0.0009553508,0.000030074345,0.000032160147,0.000080161844,0.42432916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789274,0.000087391374,0.00041259022,0.0003372619,0.00068796234,0.000582037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986951,0.00021497204,0.00021648973,0.00047498132,0.00019770274,0.000200784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005720466,0.00037177093,0.00031054183,0.000100194244,0.0012733503,0.00015973332,0.0005836783,0.0005058901,0.00016808091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002747525,0.00024389804,0.00027757243,0.000017025059,0.0006736359,0.000004891493,0.000043597298,0.00028531204,0.00029470114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110482415,2.176949e-7,0.000091345275,0.000012304152,0.00005741413,0.000005603302,0.0051892777,1.536131e-7,0.0000072721546,0.9491941,0.00008060443,0.045350697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019677519,0.000025869609,0.00028056654,0.00005590324,0.000050974762,0.0000024551066,0.0004986424,0.000005260173,0.0000035090395,0.63792264,0.36062774,0.0003296227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022676568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044219946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5723571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019614083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002615054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99458736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2471371869","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.011","title":"Bunching at the kink: Implications for spending responses to health insurance contracts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Economics; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Set (abstract data type); Object (grammar); Medicare Part D; Econometrics; Public economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Prescription drug; Medical prescription; Computer science","score_opus":0.08456020567782002,"score_gpt":0.3494598422167804,"score_spread":0.26489963653896037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2471371869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86513335,0.00015144395,0.00748762,0.12508713,0.0007281536,0.00022825426,0.00009794766,0.000008825807,0.0010772723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938637,0.0010975692,0.0014421238,0.0018849801,0.00058532174,0.0000074748978,9.0951687e-7,0.000011826276,0.0011060883],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878114,0.00017031076,0.00048031748,0.00012083266,0.00007645292,0.00037093225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976345,0.0010955683,0.0006016098,0.00017623522,0.00020634053,0.00028575968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039468487,0.00007734375,0.00019748048,0.000095622745,0.00078749814,0.00017182794,0.00044222784,0.000052296033,0.00001714355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014082814,0.000050075156,0.00011077879,0.000109298446,0.00009237136,0.0004895308,0.000041317122,0.00008393443,0.000009117581],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006148791,0.000049412098,0.70286113,0.0000046152436,0.000061802406,3.3452795e-7,0.0066379034,0.00007030265,0.0003745039,0.22673514,0.005397319,0.05774605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004547975,0.00008295862,0.7286435,0.000020731353,0.000004343732,0.000011661752,0.0026146723,0.000008012428,0.0000067182555,0.009283333,0.2587687,0.00010060137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000079997364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035779842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2533714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082087173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008511876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60568786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2471486258","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.36.1.139","title":"Impact of Background Variables on Attitudes about Family Life: A Comparative Analysis of Parents and Offspring in Israel","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Socialization; Religiosity; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Ethnic group; Family life; Family values; Social class; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Population; Demography; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.1394272233579216,"score_gpt":0.42720777477358235,"score_spread":0.2877805514156607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2471486258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839551,0.011674069,0.00018726134,0.000046803627,0.0001554732,0.00018965443,0.0000496312,0.0000062883005,0.00373572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99378055,0.0050352686,0.00095067953,0.00007494781,0.00010727688,0.0000039870974,0.0000019284128,0.000006549043,0.00003883679],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969375,0.00051010237,0.001207132,0.000241315,0.00074745243,0.00035645586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99623543,0.0010013467,0.0011999515,0.00016361066,0.0012390993,0.00016056109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011657291,0.0002974265,0.0019325807,0.0008328333,0.00022083189,0.000046123634,0.00032722641,0.00008946724,0.0000051843385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013706702,0.00023100237,0.0003713027,0.0014604741,0.00076756807,0.00040664698,0.00008402568,0.00029487195,0.000001492074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028188733,0.0006056747,0.8837554,0.000029384077,0.0065693483,0.000003304629,0.07438841,0.029140715,0.00083634944,0.003948436,0.0003456987,0.00009541168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084543834,0.00042165635,0.8219594,0.00017938203,0.0004651613,3.1247146e-7,0.17480844,0.0009008365,0.000016516853,0.00014700995,0.00009227391,0.00016360942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014922433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035888932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10042004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003594674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003844604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94200027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481678565","doi":"10.1057/9781403981356_1","title":"The War Against Children and the Shredding of the Social Contract","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Front (military); Welfare state; Political science; Strategist; Spanish Civil War; Politics; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Political economy; Public administration; Economic history; Law; Sociology; Economics; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.012824532051404701,"score_gpt":0.2453919187410101,"score_spread":0.2325673866896054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481678565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022485737,0.0026289632,0.0000076044666,0.0006541239,0.00053844735,0.0011421053,0.00020269108,0.000048667283,0.97229165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802196,0.002646075,0.000013804893,0.00068917463,0.0012158701,0.00001310255,0.000012405039,0.00005290364,0.015137064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772066,0.00025064067,0.0004718307,0.00034371752,0.00071044615,0.0005027145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827594,0.00050323294,0.00051741756,0.00045919672,0.00015383179,0.00009036027],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011688538,0.00036976163,0.00047937818,0.00004566787,0.0026271078,0.000119137585,0.0009633373,0.00041505133,0.000018784565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009130524,0.0001922973,0.00040571758,0.00002885948,0.0030299514,0.0000030743508,0.00022527618,0.0005891283,0.0000061854907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039550323,8.220182e-7,0.0015292985,0.0000061625315,0.00021400607,0.0000012383255,0.015552815,0.0000013952792,0.0000071755853,0.96325314,0.00006992706,0.019324472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030299153,0.00005272358,0.09412528,0.00018367975,0.00064843684,0.000011769953,0.0064042094,0.00014630338,0.0000123716245,0.8479258,0.046244953,0.0012145877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090040173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004908061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95773387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009140946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024286745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482556755","doi":"10.1007/s11266-016-9762-8","title":"L. Mook, J. R. Whitman, J. Quarter, and A. Armstrong (eds): Understanding the Social Economy of the United States., University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Buffalo and London, 2015, pp. 390, paperback, $38.21.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Humanities; History; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01309378877149775,"score_gpt":0.24606220688254193,"score_spread":0.23296841811104418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482556755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96083915,0.010677968,0.0096854195,0.014018642,0.0010267452,0.00045169075,0.00040174308,0.000022019793,0.0028766037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776933,0.02139625,0.00014521868,0.00013147802,0.00023079818,4.1753447e-7,0.000015994552,0.0000125991455,0.00037394874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988331,0.00018281287,0.00034594478,0.00014698585,0.00031623547,0.00017490251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998315,0.00020163815,0.00044491608,0.00010577051,0.0008421709,0.00009050732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004239048,0.00012681341,0.00019284709,0.000023510345,0.0006413209,0.000055877175,0.00041518334,0.00008762527,0.00018790412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000737238,0.00008646644,0.000052909436,0.0001057836,0.00062606414,0.0007477955,0.00014653399,0.00010696794,3.4419466e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000318504,0.00027618467,0.70222884,0.00006315415,0.0012048302,0.000009050475,0.11084536,0.000107029744,0.00087667746,0.15018524,0.032984257,0.0009008824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051857247,0.00041397192,0.49230602,0.00034039174,0.00063177716,0.00007037522,0.36976442,0.0012794938,0.00017278425,0.015358706,0.11380214,0.0006741925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01753308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030161917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25891906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036538998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021974245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98900926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2486408499","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v9n4p70","title":"Socioeconomic and Demographic Factors Affecting Labor Force Participation in Pakistan","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Demographic economics; Human resources; Economics; Socioeconomics; Labour economics; Population; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.013079188854002709,"score_gpt":0.29546450582172706,"score_spread":0.28238531696772434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2486408499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983188,0.00019148969,0.00051215413,0.00046148387,0.00013665005,0.000141555,4.6277546e-7,0.000013591247,0.00022384015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983744,0.00030352134,0.00047821732,0.000046987207,0.00004600041,0.0000030521394,2.7697047e-7,0.000010983378,0.0007365858],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987581,0.00011124546,0.0004109585,0.0001082016,0.00019495892,0.00041655928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991117,0.00019635547,0.0002698749,0.000045895285,0.00024258556,0.0001335705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016082418,0.000093123024,0.00017697494,0.00025513908,0.0002560401,0.000065436376,0.00010882876,0.00007691963,0.0000135539785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015181395,0.0000686742,0.000034993584,0.0002025637,0.0000873585,0.00043196787,0.000030244724,0.00009537169,8.8939066e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013430369,0.000032457352,0.93736386,0.000022502716,0.000021880478,0.000025354972,0.056199215,0.0000126947725,0.00009285636,0.0040585375,0.000029943509,0.0021272763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041436253,0.000028447492,0.7875943,0.000029238196,0.0000064126525,8.9954244e-7,0.20745844,0.0000029303303,0.000061567946,0.001986322,0.0023210486,0.00009603014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012001899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15125921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071957835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007110957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28004524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493126541","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139696487.006","title":"The inclusive reality of time","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.019165066790031073,"score_gpt":0.23067923828738027,"score_spread":0.2115141714973492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493126541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026939122,0.00008593471,0.00035461166,0.00007936868,0.0002840912,0.00035037813,0.00026428772,0.00006787356,0.99824405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0041099237,0.00055006443,0.000020441226,0.00005213531,0.00020131313,2.8430088e-7,0.000026034606,0.000021790673,0.995018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854046,0.00018056983,0.0001979793,0.0003105001,0.00046703225,0.0003034658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982443,0.0002990592,0.00035866536,0.0005440467,0.00040029778,0.00015361645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000542843,0.00022007397,0.00034094084,0.000066066976,0.0010211685,0.000037946036,0.00090646074,0.00041740798,0.0000046460477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004929995,0.00021268621,0.00021394562,0.000011918625,0.001276396,0.00003788851,0.0004260555,0.0003235622,0.000017065744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027587173,0.0000036844833,0.000008964989,0.000020490228,0.00008068806,0.000011961147,0.0009500607,0.0000020899104,0.000007792046,0.9720196,0.026117345,0.0007497408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018742902,0.000024066243,0.00008022549,0.00004256026,0.00012282713,5.058296e-7,0.0006829969,0.000041171043,0.0000064765186,0.0002425942,0.9983374,0.00023173788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029794348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022815258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97222006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000265223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038871853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8673092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494986051","doi":"10.1108/jes-12-2014-0207","title":"Labour supply behaviour of married women in Toronto","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Wage; Labour supply; Econometrics; Originality; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.027467827271820785,"score_gpt":0.31512249954478877,"score_spread":0.287654672272968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494986051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921016,0.0017836235,0.0000032333876,0.00064911885,0.0009013355,0.000053986092,0.00001944388,0.0000033057513,0.0044843387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98939866,0.008105364,0.00010456182,0.00004641572,0.00023947522,0.0000029741077,5.3392565e-8,0.0000059661375,0.0020965082],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897623,0.00007804243,0.00048379455,0.00008372706,0.00010243296,0.00027576133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991682,0.00017333134,0.00036649755,0.0000781812,0.00012666774,0.00008711917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012161351,0.000078109355,0.00037181022,0.00006080977,0.000067716275,0.0000107786045,0.00020639275,0.00004899916,0.00025789402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001826815,0.000055596465,0.000074060124,0.000033363816,0.00016429475,0.00028932228,0.000040506508,0.000048229507,0.0000060710795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003963558,0.000042187603,0.9447637,0.000007446327,0.00013471954,0.000005773821,0.04248595,0.0000059612166,0.00011993343,0.010479802,0.0008976784,0.0010172117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089735666,0.0001277536,0.7423368,0.000049136754,0.000014631193,0.0000017847375,0.2478641,6.8216906e-7,0.000019521947,0.005970246,0.0026174283,0.00010056549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019504746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02853772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20537816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018132878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002549888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497256593","doi":"10.1108/s0147-912120140000040008","title":"The Changing Time use of U.S. Welfare Recipients between 1992 and 2005","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Welfare; Population; Economics; Welfare reform; Work (physics); Current Population Survey; Demographic economics; Nonmarket forces; Time allocation; Labour economics; Demography; Market economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.029168606525340635,"score_gpt":0.2528085708178516,"score_spread":0.22363996429251093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2497256593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041918023,0.0003857708,0.00024017788,0.0016548609,0.00047305337,0.00043468885,0.00015589499,0.00007598428,0.9923878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030949254,0.0015407515,0.00020140209,0.0001237228,0.00043513902,0.0000023468442,0.000042788528,0.00003448189,0.9666701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986667,0.000048916034,0.00025333476,0.00024375303,0.0004119018,0.00037536104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990833,0.00024213736,0.00018892206,0.00026861776,0.00009152715,0.00012553796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006660134,0.0001864924,0.0002953333,0.000104000894,0.00072247756,0.00009893374,0.0002686887,0.00032780546,0.0002195471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056010653,0.00013723574,0.00008826488,0.000040862014,0.00037214308,0.00006770539,0.00012406231,0.00017127182,0.00004709345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065990016,0.0000060373272,0.010435404,0.000023054312,0.00016603187,0.0000015796619,0.005818741,0.0000020046293,0.0000017697467,0.9491914,0.007931935,0.026415449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081485254,0.000017982285,0.0035143155,0.00004530932,0.000058597023,1.604342e-7,0.0005530911,0.000043812233,3.1853784e-7,0.0035454363,0.9919286,0.00021094226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083540933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018627787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9839966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005234865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005361213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5596311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2499325108","doi":"10.5958/2454-1753.2016.00003.9","title":"The Patriarchal Agenda of Good Behaviour","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Motifs A Peer Reviewed International Journal of English Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Stephen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05409493599727457,"score_gpt":0.36138998103548875,"score_spread":0.3072950450382142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2499325108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.741328,0.13972825,0.0018437704,0.041500475,0.04906219,0.000947406,0.00030189488,0.00007318659,0.02521484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8742412,0.12006914,0.00038631185,0.00014026035,0.002299081,0.000006359955,0.0000012126255,0.000012617861,0.0028438685],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971524,0.00031553983,0.0007852621,0.00012106658,0.0013999385,0.00022577743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98818386,0.00067032914,0.0007321043,0.00013769296,0.010203708,0.00007233463],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033433049,0.00012713489,0.00035840692,0.00009358987,0.00023998469,0.0000557548,0.00083377416,0.000049632188,0.0000331912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0127699245,0.00006562792,0.00030402714,0.00014872807,0.0004137171,0.000259522,0.00013432321,0.0001548009,0.000004304456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002007714,0.0006053863,0.41294643,0.00011207169,0.0047131167,0.00011624955,0.20594522,0.00002927768,0.00021637432,0.10291472,0.12351913,0.14868125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011498228,0.00014857303,0.035978485,0.00060816447,0.00017783705,0.000005983511,0.041735232,0.0000021229828,0.00003451945,0.0031531993,0.91681796,0.00018809762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004836768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022158712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79329884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019767595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018161265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2499902101","doi":"10.1057/978-1-137-57535-7_6","title":"Women’s Labour and Capital Accumulation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Surplus value; Marxist philosophy; Aside; Capital (architecture); Neoclassical economics; Feminism; Relevance (law); Value (mathematics); Order (exchange); Feminist theory; Economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Gender studies; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Capitalism; History; Politics","score_opus":0.02866180380655726,"score_gpt":0.26854544636315913,"score_spread":0.23988364255660188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2499902101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103514455,0.0004241193,0.000059916332,0.000061971725,0.0006223683,0.00044098712,0.00027124077,0.00014584707,0.89445907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79814285,0.0005452696,0.00006365559,0.00026563424,0.0007020829,0.00002102535,0.000019365503,0.0000651453,0.20017499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787384,0.00006775726,0.00034153723,0.00054109894,0.0005408055,0.0006349719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987377,0.00012596241,0.00023901123,0.00036176597,0.00018885301,0.00034670797],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041109268,0.0004108979,0.00042740745,0.00018916097,0.0004609558,0.00013082656,0.0002915789,0.00060064497,0.0004634489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045628498,0.00036732035,0.00011632005,0.000015917576,0.00047670375,0.0000063182642,0.00011971389,0.00024934424,0.00013159221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011904831,6.1009416e-7,0.002351364,0.000029271943,0.000065825065,0.000017400127,0.014503544,2.444053e-7,0.000031299307,0.97232956,0.000015789792,0.010643174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043863113,0.00006039576,0.015757706,0.000073291456,0.000037757793,0.000004138391,0.001737346,0.0000056150902,0.0000022547786,0.9361372,0.04508919,0.0006564534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005306814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002004748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69462836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034350145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002381531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500625864","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139021555.007","title":"The reformation of family","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.031675503653603096,"score_gpt":0.2265310913016354,"score_spread":0.1948555876480323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500625864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009471034,0.0005085584,0.00020347664,0.00001824352,0.0005033663,0.00028495604,0.0001255034,0.0000563026,0.9973525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012654782,0.0020901728,0.0000370785,0.000032720887,0.0001769047,3.0740546e-7,0.000022037539,0.000016903805,0.9849691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891126,0.00007464322,0.00017486051,0.00015757977,0.00039499626,0.00028665326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887115,0.00009294471,0.0002934329,0.00035598065,0.00026370707,0.00012278551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036097757,0.00016789613,0.00020431446,0.00007232233,0.0007137406,0.000033109613,0.0005666709,0.00033439914,0.0000015327541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013472975,0.0001544207,0.00015025002,0.000010656291,0.0006196268,0.00012630151,0.00015193273,0.00026014747,0.0000106548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016434404,0.0000036211877,0.000016682925,0.000020202477,0.000048283568,0.0000027903643,0.00146625,7.160307e-7,0.000011447261,0.9897204,0.0065164273,0.0021767449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001419712,0.000012592484,0.00035812982,0.00003303389,0.0000959174,3.82842e-7,0.0030222014,0.000011682853,0.0000066456646,0.00005499588,0.996085,0.00017748727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011340686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006407673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9896654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023037409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021265465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62970936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503848605","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-17326-9","title":"Women's Mental Health","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.03337618008270779,"score_gpt":0.3042976885019093,"score_spread":0.2709215084192015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503848605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019028438,0.0006992895,0.000024387702,0.001393011,0.0015738959,0.00030920652,0.00008953785,0.00014282847,0.9955776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00013455289,0.0016626484,0.00026659315,0.0026678392,0.0006886453,0.000008836687,0.00013882501,0.000025671427,0.9944064],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821126,0.00009275815,0.00020388809,0.00026211777,0.00067738077,0.0005526184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990964,0.000021813183,0.00012239965,0.00019282413,0.00010029526,0.00046629313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009143894,0.00017281258,0.00029870172,0.00007099435,0.00038568172,0.00006591955,0.00032155623,0.00027661733,0.00083909335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017632317,0.00016514015,0.00006302031,0.00007653604,0.00019573979,0.0000681158,0.000060378585,0.00021610048,0.00042723594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022240617,0.000016682063,0.000052532683,0.000012470402,0.000017529766,0.0000010745263,0.048054703,2.1154015e-7,3.7791306e-8,0.14205723,0.8078817,0.0019036139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012900724,0.000060727456,0.00003148572,0.000011724443,0.0000022265792,2.6694718e-7,0.027512865,0.0000029860494,4.4214263e-9,0.024121366,0.94794786,0.00017947028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007001843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036376975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14006618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027655303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062317927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507375683","doi":"10.14288/1.0105904","title":"Intake priorities and criteria in a Family Service agency : a survey of waiting list cases and administrative implications.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Service (business); Business; Operations management; Sociology; Marketing; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.07523829975342537,"score_gpt":0.2638429675619972,"score_spread":0.18860466780857182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507375683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960069,0.00023414397,0.000020169213,0.000037419475,0.000037676673,0.00017934284,0.00044384907,0.00001624472,0.0030242698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988914,0.0005843476,0.00039439503,0.00003234695,0.000006427236,5.619778e-7,0.000011441152,0.0000048330653,0.000074248346],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992055,0.00017207216,0.00013044696,0.00022131283,0.000106419626,0.00016423751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923,0.00015195353,0.00011179126,0.00010238953,0.00032004024,0.00008377506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039482498,0.000035790556,0.0001929049,0.00004100631,0.0002661867,0.000052740343,0.00015922412,0.000082913895,0.000021928892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012677895,0.000115768904,0.00002026377,0.00035568775,0.00050455803,0.0002773512,0.00008015618,0.00006766723,3.192154e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010015687,0.000069283575,0.93043494,0.000083622035,0.000013107682,0.00003314855,0.037631713,2.9134199e-8,0.00013242254,0.00009572228,0.000047614038,0.031448398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002583585,0.000050574265,0.91248494,0.000068900656,0.0000125789875,0.0000092616265,0.08648495,0.000032182976,1.6379842e-7,0.00048575865,0.000011975709,0.00010034684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8648095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97394794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109138414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003116995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002117808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47209188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509890423","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v8n9p1","title":"Fertility, Union Wage Setting and Social Security System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Keio University","keywords":"Economics; Social security; Fertility; Labour economics; Unemployment; Wage; Pension; Total fertility rate; Tax rate; Monopolistic competition; Wage rate; Monetary economics; Population; Macroeconomics; Family planning","score_opus":0.014055273421958026,"score_gpt":0.2536955624937207,"score_spread":0.23964028907176269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509890423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99351674,0.00015732388,0.00024267189,0.003599454,0.0007625223,0.00002784565,0.000033200882,0.0000032281823,0.0016569988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972238,0.0021384312,0.00015322628,0.00007677285,0.00030781887,4.2266825e-7,5.032969e-7,0.0000035804767,0.00009544935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994695,0.000042952182,0.00023228854,0.00008738038,0.00006912868,0.00009875492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947786,0.000061969346,0.00024466473,0.000027924578,0.00015953838,0.000028031356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006624388,0.000051939776,0.000107717664,0.000044243756,0.00014130495,0.00007424152,0.00015235091,0.00005371827,0.0000026340183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028933016,0.000042628857,0.000037012927,0.000015376301,0.000112693786,0.00025638117,0.000042774922,0.000058201906,0.0000010511638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005810661,0.000042745694,0.08505381,0.000012632041,0.00008716763,0.000017734112,0.013009171,0.000032349963,0.00006387336,0.8489896,0.00017513958,0.05245764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003175105,0.00013480589,0.73608804,0.00030121036,0.000039493894,0.00008084526,0.018876899,0.004802814,0.00006812287,0.09926326,0.13663657,0.00053283264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008574488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023376924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74972636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013141497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008082332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17383544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509946955","doi":"10.1080/00036846.2016.1218428","title":"Who was affected by new welfare reform strategies? Microdata estimates from Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Economics; Welfare; Econometrics; Public economics; Macroeconomics; Sociology; Market economy; Census","score_opus":0.009968015600394398,"score_gpt":0.21655167148742097,"score_spread":0.20658365588702657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509946955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94261307,0.00011409957,0.0003832523,0.0031061326,0.00048037534,0.00023801753,0.00093852234,0.0000902112,0.05203631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968454,0.00047604833,0.0008066247,0.00043328112,0.0002560172,0.000010856571,0.00025939205,0.000031438565,0.0008809008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987123,0.00001513148,0.00025668758,0.00041525968,0.00009557156,0.00050503854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909574,0.00007087333,0.00013602959,0.00039775303,0.000026241236,0.00027336914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012528076,0.00020360637,0.00026598296,0.000025182133,0.00037576075,0.00016533335,0.0005548661,0.00016819137,0.00029329216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016582226,0.0001749143,0.000035058576,0.00008131584,0.00012956868,0.0002602726,0.000082437655,0.00009270279,0.00005686232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109518325,0.00014725243,0.014723832,0.000033819822,0.00058210164,0.00000852957,0.008867458,0.0002531763,0.00965883,0.727111,0.1807957,0.057708792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035495062,0.000057843386,0.14515969,0.000050138395,0.00016751145,0.0000015441071,0.079519376,0.00028043543,0.0027404379,0.07373352,0.6923143,0.0024256986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90853006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9469452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6533775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008533537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013909366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7132798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512833114","doi":"10.1111/irel.12151","title":"Sexual Orientation, Income, and Stress at Work","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Lesbian; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Labour economics; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Gender studies; Engineering","score_opus":0.03659811755669884,"score_gpt":0.2747230542666978,"score_spread":0.23812493670999896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512833114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99339336,0.00020544343,0.0009180574,0.0014761531,0.00038545794,0.00008569048,0.000021720201,0.0000062250315,0.0035079198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958375,0.00044269222,0.00044083127,0.00005787627,0.00061043963,0.0000015637418,0.0000015235852,0.0000047170583,0.0026028755],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992368,0.0000909613,0.00032000142,0.00010344557,0.0001045392,0.00014422511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896765,0.00040755523,0.00026954003,0.00005595176,0.00014381667,0.00015549987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072175276,0.000068662725,0.0001363349,0.000035672056,0.00048805855,0.00006814825,0.000073529125,0.00020720906,0.00007676466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018557244,0.000052525822,0.00005719245,0.00014973598,0.0002767084,0.00043722024,0.0000308675,0.00016614243,0.0000029359726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014796608,0.000016400152,0.97094625,0.00000129438,0.000065954446,8.30122e-7,0.0124113625,0.000016415308,0.000005112407,0.009398266,0.0026192938,0.0045040227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076129157,0.00030930695,0.6665473,0.00019585626,0.00022068286,0.000021016667,0.10273753,0.00005639449,0.000011879763,0.01690245,0.20483166,0.00055302045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032138676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007358794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30439895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015813996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025788086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37538013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518186030","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2014-070","title":"Targeting Tax Relief at Youth Employment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Earnings; Unemployment; Labour economics; Youth unemployment; Demographic economics; Economics; Displacement (psychology); Unemployment rate; Difference in differences; Economic growth; Psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.02852532067005525,"score_gpt":0.2672817557107483,"score_spread":0.23875643504069305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518186030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5899691,0.00025525765,0.00012654386,0.10351893,0.0010890092,0.00038064588,0.0009039218,0.00020481025,0.30355176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591022,0.00020658494,0.000060264043,0.0041561285,0.0011274293,0.000012539489,0.000024751238,0.000025012001,0.035285056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978335,0.00012365596,0.00019760388,0.00028898136,0.0002999768,0.0012562787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978397,0.000047064324,0.000070387105,0.00028142598,0.00013469372,0.0016267127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005230529,0.00013993963,0.0001349325,0.00038172194,0.0010031745,0.00013555554,0.00045670016,0.00016055432,0.00033356136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009251464,0.00011684032,0.00006413525,0.0005810869,0.00026312185,0.00024840873,0.000055996763,0.00007875414,0.00035550495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026072119,0.000028037652,0.1694495,0.000005808488,0.000045532346,0.00001949698,0.03378641,0.0000014346017,0.00014430085,0.6028596,0.17865334,0.015003914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000257008,0.00001618439,0.018401256,0.000010140896,0.000006134049,8.782243e-7,0.0057393457,0.0000051414204,0.0000033123347,0.0019559793,0.97333103,0.0002735608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75645924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87131315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79467773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029620884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066461544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25186947","doi":"10.1177/1074840714548943","title":"Brief of Amici Curiae Economics Professors in Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System (U.S. Supreme Court)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Nursing","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"National Institute of Nursing Research; National Center for Research Resources; U.S. Public Health Service","keywords":"Scrutiny; Commission; Supreme court; Exploit; Market power; Power (physics); Power of attorney; Empirical research; Health care; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Public administration; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.05804216342623267,"score_gpt":0.34175839002526515,"score_spread":0.2837162265990325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25186947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826813,0.0033352443,0.0006546761,0.0034492493,0.0036229112,0.00027496504,0.000021328098,0.000021180074,0.0059391437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99643916,0.0009455128,0.0015468852,0.00028932828,0.0007000055,6.496091e-7,0.0000042489705,0.00002538739,0.00004884689],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996943,0.0006039748,0.0011570184,0.00016733975,0.00044726938,0.00068140443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795234,0.00014030942,0.0011415228,0.0002508164,0.00011402299,0.00040100847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003572602,0.00018037925,0.00065906293,0.00025195183,0.00037797654,0.00006481223,0.0005552703,0.00019143269,0.000002858868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000821414,0.00017509006,0.0001363534,0.00028378074,0.00020626168,0.0007795476,0.00003197168,0.00046410656,0.0000011209531],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004754437,0.002572717,0.585472,0.00066556566,0.00018969308,0.000021534493,0.31657058,0.0018011761,0.0018155797,0.026331577,0.018658848,0.04542531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025410769,0.00030110127,0.6230486,0.003133473,0.00005801331,0.000058416743,0.35742897,0.0037213848,0.000047248646,0.0006239302,0.008586632,0.0004511595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011709357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033581155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044974152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001378435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010534714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71399647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523103814","doi":"","title":"Gender, institutions, and economic development: Findings and open research and policy issues","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Empowerment; Institution; Politics; Inequality; Political science; Demographic economics; Gender inequality; Occupational segregation; Socioeconomic status; Economic growth; Gender and development; Social inequality; Development economics; Economics; Social change; Sociology; Labour economics; Population; Social transformation","score_opus":0.10154256019758984,"score_gpt":0.37889605609114485,"score_spread":0.277353495893555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523103814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8851481,0.005535706,0.000034981163,0.0019293608,0.0011509357,0.0010381439,0.00023257552,0.00008166441,0.104848534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971806,0.01656161,0.0021833305,0.00023128578,0.000904118,0.00016380844,0.000037483496,0.000051452516,0.008060932],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965257,0.00035867668,0.0006204651,0.0012581766,0.00031574717,0.0009212424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981095,0.00037728215,0.0002172818,0.00050844596,0.00018398142,0.00060346024],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028560942,0.00044743656,0.0007021228,0.0007407558,0.0022933115,0.0011923423,0.00096704037,0.00071283255,0.00019911502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033478515,0.00045495864,0.00005521275,0.00015733458,0.0035136219,0.0006510003,0.002722452,0.0007347519,0.00011291947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013654028,0.00003564121,0.7482784,0.000092066555,0.000114183844,0.0000073632636,0.016229184,8.0664955e-7,0.000010642163,0.23052448,0.0031948802,0.0014987462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013879498,0.00006349059,0.566763,0.00036833985,0.00004475965,0.00004516222,0.012671715,0.000024587647,0.000025061736,0.06736083,0.34991673,0.0013283851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007130403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009784279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34672183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011497719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008026824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524075940","doi":"","title":"THE STATUS OF WOMEN IN THE SURVEYING AND MAPPING WORLD","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Cartography; Regional science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02248299325226807,"score_gpt":0.267014926502185,"score_spread":0.24453193324991693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524075940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9604208,0.00015461617,0.0000220504,0.00035233784,0.00010060687,0.00017378978,0.0000021335354,0.000007017857,0.038766686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986728,0.00022716993,0.000089462,0.00009721868,0.000017189204,0.00000758765,5.9227494e-7,0.000002783551,0.0008852202],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988324,0.00025242,0.00013235008,0.00007044223,0.00019575779,0.00051662984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990379,0.0006965615,0.000047947193,0.00014154839,0.0000230283,0.00005300148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002404995,0.000041155457,0.000089105895,0.000033538538,0.00019375491,0.000059496153,0.00017318407,0.000020500465,0.000021944452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024294613,0.000024515955,0.000013319053,0.00031002288,0.00012307525,0.00004858052,0.000030118299,0.00006599561,0.000009393241],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024050987,0.000012374155,0.7647471,0.000021359661,0.000008238212,4.0953805e-7,0.20095026,0.000009801574,0.000025278025,0.031224078,0.000065801825,0.0029329115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009502957,0.0000070952224,0.80022514,0.000011988571,0.0000012941072,8.785681e-8,0.18056321,0.0002813117,2.9518043e-7,0.0076312884,0.011143372,0.000039865834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017362603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005222598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038252015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007316608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009222285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29143322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526139390","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1385","title":"Book Notes: The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Mothers and Fathers Are Going Broke, by Elizabeth Warren and Amelia Warren Tyagi","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trap (plumbing); Class (philosophy); Sociology; Middle class; Economic history; History; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Geography; Epistemology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.018956277256784018,"score_gpt":0.25342887171980655,"score_spread":0.23447259446302254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526139390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61983436,0.118358225,0.016036246,0.035905965,0.003134227,0.0016467202,0.00025445936,0.00042809878,0.2044017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98721474,0.0062166695,0.0007126241,0.0045906953,0.00039304208,0.0000064891397,0.0000032619223,0.000051073686,0.00081140414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976261,0.00029168904,0.00037958406,0.00036351796,0.00061773707,0.00072134275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987155,0.00020320757,0.0002916731,0.0002287284,0.00012354724,0.00043733654],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000937645,0.00030235926,0.00033755339,0.00006508557,0.0019938748,0.00058929966,0.00048317047,0.00019435839,0.0000577659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007769285,0.00022989132,0.00012581883,0.00020363623,0.00081174594,0.00051104446,0.000064594904,0.00065162365,0.000012753694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035815654,0.000877703,0.22413096,0.0003754184,0.0016759124,0.00034355107,0.3191544,0.0051701847,0.0033459214,0.3959379,0.02172919,0.02690071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019168561,0.0009744559,0.030491699,0.0025050458,0.0009758922,0.0006939072,0.24994697,0.0033488988,0.00037330246,0.2866064,0.40019032,0.0047245454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015242443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072363384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37846112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020446647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001520045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532209844","doi":"10.1177/0020715216674252","title":"Explaining patterns of inequality in childcare service use across 31 developed economies: A welfare state perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Disadvantaged; Welfare state; Economics; Welfare; Social inequality; Social Welfare; Perspective (graphical); Government (linguistics); Labour economics; Public economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Political science; Market economy; Politics","score_opus":0.09101223177950038,"score_gpt":0.40307622121197717,"score_spread":0.3120639894324768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532209844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98965013,0.000067760586,0.0017830877,0.006833089,0.0007302578,0.00009552858,0.00023829295,0.000006739614,0.000595121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895597,0.00015472253,0.000275001,0.00035245297,0.00017793331,0.0000039420956,0.000005359639,0.0000060922307,0.00006854979],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998083,0.0005579992,0.0006683122,0.00016493765,0.00027524546,0.0002505267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996141,0.0006951555,0.0007563672,0.00007558212,0.00225872,0.00007316803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091628806,0.00012612184,0.00040778273,0.00013565582,0.000118499585,0.000030978837,0.0005289928,0.00010386277,0.000064018364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031193384,0.000098100936,0.00010345851,0.00009122807,0.0003273572,0.0005257865,0.00008613883,0.0002192129,0.000005251437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014621584,0.00006227866,0.5894114,0.0000023489586,0.00020367264,0.000011906318,0.37842497,0.00024044867,0.00007495868,0.031229695,0.000035185658,0.00015696237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010324041,0.000060277172,0.7104758,0.00005806876,0.0000043947243,0.000004376612,0.28073922,0.000019272864,0.000025968468,0.0066165966,0.0008623531,0.000101261896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001885395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013322778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12106445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007097456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004436065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7434423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532425429","doi":"","title":"Who Drives the Car? Hypothesizing the Impact of Trends in Post- Secondary Education on the Labour Market, Home Production and Gender Roles","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Labour economics; Demographic economics; Business; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.039287853826804255,"score_gpt":0.308707771898102,"score_spread":0.2694199180712977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532425429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9496484,0.00009364338,0.0000019316676,0.008989703,0.000046818466,0.00030102537,0.00001506833,0.000006621147,0.04089681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916728,0.00036236426,0.000028223441,0.000027521553,0.000055272605,0.0000015195121,0.0000023376706,0.0000053444733,0.007844621],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811053,0.0009229073,0.0000774946,0.00017354598,0.00044997112,0.00026557202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988703,0.00037140792,0.00007309279,0.00026510557,0.0003639113,0.00005619215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020038097,0.00007137631,0.000105101695,0.00027289256,0.00083847967,0.00005328192,0.00048161874,0.00006374275,0.00042061665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019951569,0.000043621134,0.00006348716,0.0007372031,0.00088604674,0.00028824926,0.00008672307,0.00031393944,0.000003841887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034228517,0.00032449982,0.5665234,0.00005199668,0.00016684845,0.0000018630093,0.25459388,0.00008776207,0.00292991,0.08091865,0.02705303,0.06731398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065185166,0.000049172744,0.80199873,0.000008454975,0.0000041031167,4.206833e-7,0.19441497,0.000115257484,0.000006920997,0.0025746708,0.0007210527,0.000041034884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011439851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012223925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2354754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012416742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046448308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99514306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532952563","doi":"","title":"Gender-Based Analysis and Differing Worldviews","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04753100282603695,"score_gpt":0.2787211458913849,"score_spread":0.23119014306534796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532952563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896134,0.0012363227,0.00007432158,0.00022287814,0.00019103392,0.00011969291,0.000022077149,0.000039951745,0.008480294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958556,0.0012033879,0.00021621892,0.0010826843,0.000094522846,0.0000379867,0.0000036390331,0.0000099630815,0.0014959748],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986309,0.00008834651,0.00015891135,0.00026491593,0.00020050131,0.0006564532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999062,0.00009184558,0.00004455038,0.00016543336,0.00010163984,0.00053454825],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028180098,0.00014439048,0.0003375974,0.00042054357,0.0014890545,0.000036677764,0.00013869417,0.000055365163,0.000055698776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013216514,0.00014217445,0.00007151077,0.0010611238,0.00048101047,0.00006668281,0.000023331591,0.00008561231,0.000009745631],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023057771,0.000013589062,0.83102036,0.00002421015,0.00076364155,0.000064545806,0.16368681,0.00007189645,0.000006565063,0.0036487042,0.00029122733,0.00040613578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033231033,0.000030057367,0.6295269,0.000008454281,0.0002174218,9.454919e-7,0.34728503,0.00019355307,0.0000016123254,0.0019983752,0.019913806,0.00049150886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010367733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4710444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46067667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006444312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000483574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535040021","doi":"10.1596/978-1-4648-0902-6_ch3","title":"Female Labor Force Participation and Labor Market Outcomes in Latin America and the Caribbean","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"The World Bank eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Earnings; Unemployment; Political science; Social security; Informal sector; Productivity; Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.020741211762900138,"score_gpt":0.27181009056330957,"score_spread":0.25106887880040946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535040021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03953273,0.00056202814,0.0000108594195,0.00474943,0.00027929049,0.0009199239,0.0001268439,0.00007893934,0.95373994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3094997,0.00029913976,0.0000408624,0.0011251314,0.00014718759,0.00004420994,0.0000025282307,0.000037186062,0.68880403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984756,0.00024476027,0.00031070047,0.00029784985,0.0003133309,0.00035772257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832535,0.0009454643,0.00022220821,0.00035271404,0.00007391414,0.00008035003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074193644,0.00025837874,0.0004088089,0.00010093531,0.00041040365,0.00010521165,0.00028036462,0.00013217668,0.00009701208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000094282834,0.00014034526,0.000067644265,0.000050991268,0.0013581478,0.0000444301,0.00012438877,0.00028105936,0.000008186627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008878275,0.000006598706,0.025635704,0.000019722956,0.00007518511,0.0000039890215,0.028770914,8.435248e-7,0.0000039092542,0.93453467,0.0004928962,0.0103667965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002814955,0.000062301144,0.22878993,0.00028107545,0.00035542107,8.6632883e-7,0.0077842297,0.00016758175,0.0000034828959,0.24035884,0.5183964,0.0009849707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007091854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029389352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69417584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006260739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010792503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9883218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535365207","doi":"","title":"\"I'm finally there\": An examination of a feminist program working to change the dynamics of women's poverty","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UWSpace (University of Waterloo)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Dynamics (music); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Economic growth; Pedagogy; Economics","score_opus":0.020217412370490705,"score_gpt":0.2481912860990694,"score_spread":0.2279738737285787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535365207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949795,0.00002862643,0.000010494836,0.00047944527,0.00037554846,0.00078019884,0.00006565099,0.0000391226,0.0032414042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94938016,0.0001305397,0.001004044,0.000034483182,0.00006238402,0.000004883524,0.00027914575,0.000021236705,0.04908313],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984395,0.00018644321,0.00016530568,0.00028473095,0.00055059657,0.00037343547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985738,0.00006140077,0.0004900304,0.00034634804,0.00039587173,0.00013256517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008156477,0.00018805376,0.00037614704,0.00021843269,0.00036571655,0.000031073967,0.0008046779,0.00042771306,0.00006349934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004089099,0.00018240826,0.00012341113,0.0005135311,0.00026442853,0.0001692116,0.000059939182,0.0002765018,0.0000026184623],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089218316,0.00022694924,0.0048361677,0.00014738999,0.00005518163,0.0000029842104,0.9306148,0.000004298611,0.00023209429,0.0044489168,0.000022676188,0.05931928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018715065,0.00029477203,0.17231406,0.00010997346,0.00006845949,1.5129721e-7,0.82527405,0.00033442292,0.000018429278,0.00018042568,0.0010321242,0.00018596977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04815601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5863736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5382176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024037043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021265306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9581824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2536305334","doi":"","title":"New Evidence on the Human Capital Explanation on the Family Gap","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.1722585495377821,"score_gpt":0.3549215484054198,"score_spread":0.18266299886763768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2536305334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86118305,0.000024021747,0.00026288725,0.020934192,0.00007615138,0.00031118497,0.0000072621897,0.000024297671,0.11717698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99245393,0.00023846954,0.00008747983,0.00016746405,0.00008837304,4.729809e-7,0.0000026683508,0.00000532888,0.006955819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975676,0.0004787428,0.00006894056,0.00021242448,0.0013161079,0.00035618964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985253,0.0007271218,0.000053476815,0.00032589427,0.00024541924,0.00012278969],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021644034,0.0000741059,0.00008634805,0.00015688538,0.0021397364,0.00006568707,0.0010390504,0.000083678824,0.00022092907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039722756,0.000057364447,0.00006501133,0.0005946017,0.0006112109,0.00023072149,0.00009493463,0.00039073118,0.00017697047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037496284,0.00004386252,0.004498908,0.0000038490953,0.000013007577,0.000010166903,0.023802338,0.00006075367,0.0005678036,0.9613318,0.009229206,0.00043459955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063730264,0.0005736091,0.43403965,0.00016516895,0.000015425288,4.2352332e-7,0.45694375,0.00004808891,0.00012523716,0.08262291,0.024585782,0.00024265097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011975228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015062793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87870884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030104493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004527943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99915934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538069817","doi":"10.1002/soej.12150","title":"Evaluating Workplace Mandates with Flows Versus Stocks: An Application to California Paid Family Leave","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Workforce; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economics; Business; Finance; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.035369645155830486,"score_gpt":0.3119097286042717,"score_spread":0.2765400834484412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2538069817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9737947,0.000048152477,0.022335544,0.00065458054,0.00050384394,0.00026371607,0.00010623998,0.000049622377,0.0022436248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941691,0.000048914233,0.0037480667,0.0001630322,0.0010660827,0.000021120792,0.000004936998,0.000034859397,0.0007438571],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856704,0.00019230395,0.00028848316,0.0002884031,0.00021660594,0.0004471679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990276,0.00011408193,0.00020770752,0.00022241069,0.000098499535,0.0003297156],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015622312,0.00015217696,0.00017398309,0.0000776108,0.0006391615,0.0001877905,0.00036902132,0.00009164455,0.00017114046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053708718,0.00010906303,0.00005561697,0.00007579693,0.00008780671,0.00024719525,0.000029490031,0.0001502403,0.0012003456],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028429923,0.00022139706,0.4161163,0.000015933883,0.0005229851,0.00001659379,0.1662145,0.02450853,0.0064036166,0.004598455,0.0012309763,0.37730774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01625789,0.0029249263,0.04196574,0.00033799303,0.00037182798,0.00006292729,0.8361517,0.016291024,0.00006743944,0.02316643,0.059423614,0.00297846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005121541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070638056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66993725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005478357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044861675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550903168","doi":"","title":"Les résultats éducatifs de long terme des élèves de l'école secondaire privée au Québec : une évaluation des effets de traitement avec données longitudinales","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.037419987774759626,"score_gpt":0.2886515240676163,"score_spread":0.25123153629285666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550903168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656678,0.005920882,0.009898867,0.0022343444,0.0032236234,0.0015347474,0.00040364807,0.00030756008,0.010808533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799451,0.0018788291,0.009224753,0.00030199092,0.0015377194,0.00051493576,0.000082113096,0.0001575499,0.006356999],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99100214,0.0020190305,0.0017090759,0.0018272036,0.00078821264,0.00265432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942116,0.0016464543,0.0012664339,0.0010394745,0.00063604105,0.0012000103],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042283917,0.0013858619,0.001456917,0.00045870405,0.0033168553,0.00047128618,0.0015476195,0.0013397149,0.0011432073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010370003,0.0014108998,0.00085833314,0.000532204,0.007338601,0.0008094246,0.00046710743,0.0010520015,0.00023962106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043699867,0.000568727,0.7747546,0.0007817906,0.0005390805,0.000046842677,0.1789314,0.0006274053,0.00035489665,0.004532573,0.00026873648,0.038550284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013245161,0.00017523003,0.9536635,0.0016923847,0.0005503016,0.00013970125,0.023649242,0.0007634235,0.00025541114,0.01462381,0.0016198562,0.0015425832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11220185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68512666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57292485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015865814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020411933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552109385","doi":"","title":"Essays on the economics of gender","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Uppsala Universitet; Simon Fraser University; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Universiteit Maastricht; University of Southampton; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; University of Oregon; University of Leicester; McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience; Harvard University; Northwestern University; University of Miami; Sage Foundation; University of Toronto; National University of Singapore; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Economics; Neoclassical economics; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics","score_opus":0.0224778943701286,"score_gpt":0.27206263105969236,"score_spread":0.24958473668956377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552109385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71249866,0.0007051955,0.000121389836,0.0051739225,0.0040542455,0.0008609199,0.00044700605,0.00026309906,0.27587554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98420036,0.0036925643,0.0008953533,0.00014978617,0.0002203222,0.00012295453,0.0001216898,0.0000748325,0.010522144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975279,0.00008328029,0.00069039525,0.0006035608,0.00048202634,0.00061286095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721134,0.0001264627,0.0010248218,0.0011402409,0.00040446274,0.00009266093],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061600306,0.0004658517,0.0007548672,0.0008055675,0.00053263747,0.000034318382,0.0017159563,0.0017615182,0.000117005984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006086975,0.00035143638,0.00031007282,0.00071090006,0.0014421054,0.00020129382,0.00009494318,0.00069052656,0.000051314386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056877907,0.00017613392,0.006057089,0.00014637981,0.0004544464,0.00000702316,0.0049125953,0.000033079126,0.00067750557,0.9732432,0.004031799,0.010203868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019271743,0.00044863237,0.012724902,0.0010948266,0.0006646294,0.0000040504888,0.051482964,0.00004815967,0.007131682,0.19040795,0.73187774,0.0021872758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024517538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033357004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78283525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026549053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097652257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557742881","doi":"10.1086/689203","title":"Long-Term Employment and Earnings Patterns of Welfare Recipients: The Role of the Local Labor Market","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Labour economics; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Cash; Diversity (politics); Work (physics); Demographic economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.013423786075730512,"score_gpt":0.27792028941672314,"score_spread":0.2644965033409926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557742881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93029964,0.02752501,0.00006589175,0.03765335,0.00030312446,0.00090126105,0.00014031953,0.00002460087,0.0030867779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9419127,0.055920616,0.0000065437744,0.0016417003,0.00010212548,0.000021450434,0.000001996244,0.000012144654,0.00038071678],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837685,0.0005242946,0.00029377814,0.00016093189,0.0004118074,0.00023235018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991138,0.00008539982,0.000288651,0.00021069411,0.0002485322,0.000052927546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008141431,0.0001113693,0.0002745197,0.000011060453,0.00043806966,0.000012425591,0.0004704348,0.000083427214,0.00027310196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000703694,0.000056237222,0.00011256363,0.00034244437,0.000226286,0.00007552848,0.00015677026,0.00008851346,0.00000431796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055875853,0.00004036614,0.8959124,0.00084243633,0.000039484305,2.6258547e-7,0.008424286,3.806801e-8,0.000029870367,0.005353591,0.00008705659,0.08926464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014338507,0.000013010221,0.9440928,0.0012811838,0.000094150404,2.688939e-7,0.004728792,4.993781e-7,0.0000058991463,0.0002718915,0.049279235,0.00008887268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018228516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050849123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08917577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006231823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008892128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33693218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561787847","doi":"10.3386/w22950","title":"Targeting Policies: Multiple Testing and Distributional Treatment Effects","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Michigan Diabetes Research Center, University of Michigan","keywords":"Computer science; Economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.35208519179057884,"score_gpt":0.5063554751075703,"score_spread":0.15427028331699144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561787847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08034566,0.00161683,0.000045177585,0.0015254979,0.0010046103,0.0011054649,0.0021564614,0.000057038513,0.9121433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831728,0.003985518,0.00036371817,0.000009795818,0.0023291532,0.00007734959,0.00043925177,0.000026612277,0.009595846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967206,0.0002526872,0.00050239026,0.00045830084,0.0014815202,0.0005844611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99251306,0.0044912184,0.00027568568,0.00013990849,0.002394575,0.00018555419],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046402533,0.00018887104,0.00035830308,0.00036974603,0.0007362416,0.000097705284,0.0002935464,0.00035254046,0.00013064341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009229513,0.00016613588,0.00009496266,0.00019348151,0.0007271546,0.00014091854,0.00012274766,0.0002626678,0.000043339816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052854368,0.00030901658,0.42037424,0.00022379987,0.00051509996,0.000009669987,0.0036769642,0.00036832283,0.00061629975,0.52936316,0.037915062,0.006575537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031766337,0.00056869345,0.11763884,0.0006728245,0.00008241002,0.000026290967,0.009306109,0.0036108713,0.00008417201,0.5633763,0.29988378,0.0015730469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026937237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017523476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9028271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004937836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009853061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564511638","doi":"10.1002/pam.22062","title":"The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Household Finances","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Education Sciences; University of Toronto; Ohio State University","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Earnings; Economics; Debt; Point (geometry); National Longitudinal Surveys; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Educational attainment; Labour economics; Tax credit; Demographic economics; State income tax; Tax reform; Public economics; Finance; Economic growth","score_opus":0.023326265586216838,"score_gpt":0.3270358370563677,"score_spread":0.3037095714701509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564511638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825384,0.00013663477,0.00025679913,0.0029748196,0.00017043544,0.0000860656,0.000010183867,0.0000031803836,0.013823451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936747,0.0037790104,0.00005542129,0.00015837264,0.00049363956,8.949527e-7,1.3620918e-7,0.0000035283742,0.0018343218],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885213,0.00015087346,0.00030108818,0.00008005592,0.00042087762,0.00019498589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999053,0.00008156849,0.00047750078,0.00020358447,0.00011928347,0.00006506329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011088282,0.00007955953,0.00020277145,0.00024892416,0.00054949254,0.00009146524,0.00040746035,0.000033064644,0.0000105415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010021771,0.000037852722,0.00035845485,0.00115729,0.00033071236,0.00007607978,0.000074421725,0.00008774854,8.0750436e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023839193,0.00046942997,0.6063221,0.000046885256,0.011920968,0.00001550724,0.026825095,0.007764586,0.00008074067,0.28383228,0.03508179,0.027402245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019429515,0.00017864676,0.9805115,0.00001852067,0.000444031,3.6667268e-7,0.0036403306,0.00018774383,0.000005849664,0.004317682,0.010442715,0.000058336682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044831317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026105954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3741894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089667614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008597534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67771834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565011519","doi":"10.1177/0891243205278166","title":"Divorce Culture and Marital Gender Equality","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gender & Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Gender equality; Leverage (statistics); Marital status; Multilevel model; Survey data collection; Distribution (mathematics); Demographic economics; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Political science; Demography; Economics; Population","score_opus":0.041852589343245324,"score_gpt":0.30474931979571523,"score_spread":0.2628967304524699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565011519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7752065,0.005478696,0.007453357,0.0018930085,0.0008687439,0.0005507863,0.00010952293,0.00045370945,0.20798565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817778,0.001830135,0.0062479954,0.0029328975,0.00086453214,0.000010287401,0.000022621549,0.000020352909,0.0062934128],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803466,0.00015506492,0.00022651543,0.000436195,0.0005331229,0.00061442674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992502,0.00004595404,0.00007337671,0.00024738707,0.00012492537,0.00025816148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008063878,0.00020255592,0.00019686358,0.000012734339,0.0009636499,0.00015371003,0.00025607308,0.00032998278,0.00015170494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034745102,0.00019218438,0.0002157753,0.00023161402,0.00038794207,0.00030845252,0.00013117807,0.00030390843,0.000042723306],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006434198,0.00017153313,0.13641714,0.00006883674,0.00019718864,0.0000022613367,0.72802967,0.00004433696,0.0003644786,0.073518395,0.05755351,0.003626205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009129457,0.00002561603,0.2561567,0.00000589939,0.00008880543,0.000005404119,0.35539848,0.0008285995,0.000015658843,0.012792417,0.37296706,0.0008024034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040068652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005137639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3726312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018923545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016738396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7837052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565400267","doi":"10.36095/banxico/di.2016.16","title":"You, Me and the Mean: a Semiparametric Approach to the Redistributive Effects of Transfer Programs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Transfer (computing); Econometrics; Semiparametric model; Economics; Demographic economics; Computer science; Nonparametric statistics","score_opus":0.02017188578201611,"score_gpt":0.262547496809237,"score_spread":0.24237561102722088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565400267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40720177,0.005546042,0.24468042,0.008288641,0.002467131,0.016205207,0.00038625795,0.00029783766,0.31492668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966347,0.00081701187,0.0005215282,0.00017182797,0.00022241096,0.00041053584,0.000023557328,0.000016289237,0.0011821298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741244,0.0007040133,0.00029500635,0.000493572,0.0006596975,0.0004352442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982736,0.00073791546,0.000080606325,0.00052361714,0.00023756978,0.00014670238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021212723,0.00025629293,0.00046747524,0.00007970874,0.00033812056,0.0001385371,0.00086207077,0.00035277917,0.0000035125242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041781762,0.000112568676,0.00020726086,0.0006745637,0.0010317854,0.000039430863,0.00029820303,0.00039302706,0.0000032633773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001712866,0.00032748174,0.0044317544,0.00050564687,0.00066410773,0.0000016807461,0.28094062,0.00005109973,0.000017965674,0.6869325,0.0010851682,0.024870662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017303918,0.0012966718,0.074384645,0.0017971316,0.0049414835,0.000011373766,0.40711284,0.0068011577,0.0007287139,0.39567694,0.084165804,0.005779331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021620654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054016954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58943295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008856925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023971526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45904174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25654640","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-444-59568-3.00026-2","title":"The Labor Market in Computable General Equilibrium Models","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Handbook of computable general equilibrium modeling","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Computable general equilibrium; Economics; Unemployment; Involuntary unemployment; Microsimulation; Supply and demand; Supply side; Demand side; Wage; Principal (computer security); Labour economics; Production (economics); Wage bargaining; Labor demand; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0339982875139838,"score_gpt":0.2581977800697055,"score_spread":0.2241994925557217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25654640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09965029,0.044869516,0.09430907,0.0007177879,0.0041607125,0.002836377,0.00027352068,0.00047870795,0.752704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044396177,0.016856596,0.026917048,0.00088772236,0.004274829,0.00011575082,0.0002623434,0.00059216376,0.90569735],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925871,0.0003598953,0.0019881434,0.001312741,0.0016746179,0.0020775034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611753,0.0003620048,0.0007573891,0.0011878582,0.0010471961,0.000528023],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018061711,0.0011114986,0.0016848965,0.00045546473,0.0006026089,0.00064515264,0.0019342449,0.0011205103,0.00041461404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045997676,0.0010316675,0.0005711842,0.00033239814,0.000715917,0.00090865645,0.0009725248,0.0010940707,0.000074463154],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008531865,0.000050771196,0.000057618123,0.00009917876,0.0001369984,0.000016546479,0.0011644505,0.9109256,0.00036778642,0.079416975,0.0063498802,0.0013288436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007907614,0.00006992194,0.0000023712375,0.00052075594,0.00007928856,0.0000059617378,0.00020452819,0.84610987,0.000015915053,0.1309058,0.020342883,0.0009519332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004449072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005198017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15299335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005177088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016024855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565759628","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.598841","title":"A Political Economy Model of Congressional Careers, Second Version","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Political economy; Public administration; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.011708773757367664,"score_gpt":0.2597042795353482,"score_spread":0.24799550577798052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565759628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92275906,0.00061869866,0.0077224663,0.002098087,0.00028484137,0.00010866112,0.00002320816,0.000021761374,0.06636323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980307,0.0002398188,0.00020657221,0.00024984538,0.00023068857,0.0000012008664,0.000004244319,0.000010347063,0.0010265701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974753,0.000064243824,0.0002264359,0.0001430429,0.00029004872,0.0018009319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938554,0.000034621386,0.00010759323,0.00009185524,0.00017016672,0.00021023114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092942454,0.00010122726,0.00015980857,0.00008734045,0.0003716927,0.00003287994,0.00028147726,0.00012622392,0.000061290324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003992207,0.000096019256,0.00012006578,0.0001046894,0.00021337163,0.000220921,0.00002855356,0.00081373873,0.000011335618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016860731,0.000044014825,0.0022021565,0.000003448045,0.00003867377,0.0000012269312,0.0011683025,0.00042197417,0.00012700958,0.9958067,0.000058856727,0.00011079937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008883629,0.00010620952,0.0002947972,0.000014805784,0.000021182079,0.000023017536,0.029739903,0.00047746248,0.000047620895,0.96712357,0.0011321027,0.00013094305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024484095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028472182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075271666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016701994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009653811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99596053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566813662","doi":"","title":"\"Are We There Yet?\" The Quest for Gender Equity in Family Analysis.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian home economics journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Gender equity; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Business; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Political science","score_opus":0.0763730460708086,"score_gpt":0.31002966606393423,"score_spread":0.23365661999312565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566813662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9488375,0.0019825674,0.0003602563,0.0029308647,0.0014883839,0.0002728441,0.00015638079,0.00000974747,0.04396145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99439484,0.0027517253,0.00020025416,0.0016411926,0.00026923147,0.000010620127,0.000004715309,0.000019538162,0.0007078982],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835587,0.00020969845,0.00035529622,0.00022712504,0.00009395777,0.0007580444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986622,0.00013087103,0.00024450073,0.0002234426,0.00011655177,0.00062243175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020391587,0.00014523507,0.0002858195,0.00038740452,0.0009340434,0.0004045224,0.00054490194,0.00016631096,0.00015686122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014247307,0.00013083522,0.00022123223,0.00044644764,0.00015100812,0.00020334608,0.000015422382,0.000329313,0.00001397767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072812345,0.000029455037,0.7356094,0.000007837221,0.0004304347,0.000031473195,0.012847068,0.007215823,0.0000017654802,0.23401602,0.008253137,0.0015503231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054396456,0.000016501745,0.57497555,0.000008923722,0.00014236847,0.00000845245,0.06195858,0.0009429439,4.585444e-7,0.07165328,0.2893592,0.00038975707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027682368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91324604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8855637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016148015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025955664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97879237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2568893682","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Technological Change within the Home","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Technological change; Economic geography; Environmental planning; Geography; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.023072749810582438,"score_gpt":0.2841976746293099,"score_spread":0.26112492481872746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2568893682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85649914,0.0012126224,0.00003284736,0.000594847,0.0003259454,0.0003729838,0.000023487733,0.000052472475,0.14088567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870761,0.0020358823,0.00006711888,0.0000056468666,0.00005120991,6.307409e-7,0.000025691921,0.0000080526515,0.010729675],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989739,0.00018029794,0.000089058696,0.00016995928,0.00035845643,0.0002283425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988886,0.00013691347,0.0003993167,0.00033086076,0.00018696554,0.00005731061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006377048,0.0001388493,0.00026079873,0.000026350408,0.00077611755,0.000018248464,0.0009419243,0.00038911522,0.00057240843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075105374,0.000094756,0.00023342567,0.000119835306,0.00064284576,0.00013946395,0.000053474592,0.00020589665,0.0000060616253],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040239218,0.00019286395,0.016121428,0.00011526561,0.0005751199,0.000007481865,0.72108305,0.000028536335,0.00031307433,0.20301624,0.0019419888,0.056202564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012399023,0.00009455803,0.57451683,0.000025558998,0.000054627482,1.2473065e-7,0.42370167,0.00007844558,0.0000013904476,0.0004669502,0.0008201618,0.00011570555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45965907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64519715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5583954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027215484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021442074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6267471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581151158","doi":"10.1177/0020715216689294","title":"Sex segregation by field of study and the influence of labor markets: Evidence from 39 countries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Unemployment; Economics; Generalized method of moments; Field (mathematics); Demographic economics; Empirical research; Labour economics; Panel data; Economic growth; Econometrics","score_opus":0.03771536605524133,"score_gpt":0.3912157241857933,"score_spread":0.353500358130552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581151158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99448866,0.0008023148,0.0003235303,0.003516136,0.0003680445,0.00011717256,0.00003546254,0.0000016737218,0.00034700424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860287,0.00092896057,0.000098346165,0.00018629718,0.000103607184,0.0000021003443,9.07925e-7,0.0000017546557,0.000075168246],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984989,0.00057479984,0.00038393462,0.00008073051,0.000385785,0.00007583171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951739,0.002427638,0.0010659851,0.00010340308,0.0012018265,0.000027297858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012258927,0.00006616914,0.00029111933,0.00003752515,0.00021272402,0.000043938562,0.000685979,0.000063986285,0.000029543302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089307356,0.00004629829,0.000048711197,0.000021204258,0.001652626,0.00034320148,0.00006982881,0.00015737068,6.8165645e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004283217,0.00005885091,0.8456233,0.0000021058877,0.0003012171,0.000002075393,0.14133562,0.00006556928,0.0003955778,0.011259001,0.00041837108,0.000109984925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011968061,0.00018084951,0.928667,0.000060139773,0.000040065395,0.0000013936556,0.047076758,0.00011336166,0.00019014982,0.022103002,0.0003147057,0.000055754947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016150766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036552627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09425887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036955324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017600141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60891694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582236365","doi":"10.15195/v4.a7","title":"The Decoupling of Sex and Marriage: Cohort Trends in Who Did and Did Not Delay Sex until Marriage for U.S. Women Born 1938–1985","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute on Aging; York University","keywords":"National Survey of Family Growth; Demography; Premarital sex; Sexual revolution; Cohort; Decoupling (probability); Human sexuality; Psychology; Family planning; Sociology; Medicine; Gender studies; Population; Research methodology","score_opus":0.03124270440920372,"score_gpt":0.32919151703339045,"score_spread":0.2979488126241867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2582236365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939462,0.00013008497,0.00013220128,0.00092898915,0.00021902753,0.00027108678,0.000021644262,0.000041387077,0.004309403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978131,0.00082787726,0.0002593762,0.00015915169,0.00009641732,0.00005011285,0.0000012031054,0.000008868728,0.0007838658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787587,0.00011996763,0.0002828796,0.00053682615,0.00040532323,0.0007791149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985132,0.0006567598,0.00020182319,0.00031512722,0.000091590155,0.00022146432],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006511751,0.00014909465,0.00031451456,0.00005616609,0.0025355741,0.0003417756,0.00091923843,0.0001958255,0.00001043575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013129235,0.000097977434,0.00005242876,0.00023026038,0.0063529285,0.00028928585,0.0003262027,0.00019833237,4.2887652e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021879418,0.000025925923,0.9577743,0.000007609461,0.0000087405615,0.0000023066475,0.013340846,0.000009932446,0.0005194663,0.012922288,0.000035371497,0.015331382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032767915,0.000100419085,0.9681768,0.00000688994,0.0000065634463,5.805374e-7,0.012399346,0.0019946517,0.000024098974,0.015287239,0.0015059327,0.00016979358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048534514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082615425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015161588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013795489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014016654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W258557602","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199322510.001.0001","title":"Social Democratic America","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Korea Labor Institute; University of Toronto; University of Oxford; University of California, Los Angeles; University of Cambridge; Yale University; Stryker; Sage Foundation; University of Pennsylvania; Harvard Kennedy School; Princeton University","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.021318033743028,"score_gpt":0.28628379982045943,"score_spread":0.26496576607743144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W258557602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000041443698,0.00006698005,0.002463527,0.0008164962,0.0006138503,0.0001933269,0.000010243162,0.00017709535,0.99561703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011267753,0.0001578426,0.0004852533,0.0020003696,0.0022833762,0.000007942105,0.0000583158,0.000034898945,0.9938452],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840045,0.0001340182,0.00022347213,0.00029413908,0.00053258496,0.00041531498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930805,0.00011788168,0.0001534456,0.00017077124,0.00011938481,0.00013048809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002551765,0.00021156877,0.00036345923,0.00006992774,0.0007351808,0.000083725936,0.00041712733,0.0005014211,0.0006629367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005094669,0.00020642654,0.0001750145,0.00010325738,0.0004923874,0.00005003074,0.00005010566,0.0002920921,0.0007129482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.823307e-7,0.000011192446,0.000112948575,0.000017019569,0.000029712859,0.0000020407217,0.005567906,7.5448736e-7,3.4736243e-7,0.23791055,0.7533556,0.002990899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006979007,0.000017099932,0.0002440528,0.000007918975,0.00004347994,1.4057564e-7,0.0015922912,0.000037691836,2.711676e-8,0.084908746,0.9127976,0.00028119935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039592697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018266174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15944192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026692677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011687529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91637444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588136974","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2016-082","title":"The Manitoba Basic Annual Income Experiment: Lessons Learned 40 Years Later","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Basic income; Cash; Economic inequality; Economics; Demographic economics; Public economics; Inequality; Finance","score_opus":0.049226133131697325,"score_gpt":0.32844060828813865,"score_spread":0.2792144751564413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588136974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6820551,0.00017076578,0.0000023495475,0.12215792,0.001058777,0.00022975133,0.00025154068,0.00006614724,0.19400762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846855,0.00020020135,0.00001335565,0.0016528418,0.0010210804,0.000021544409,0.000008525549,0.000022540495,0.012374443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998144,0.00013323735,0.00014409806,0.00024266937,0.00027087136,0.0010651588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980509,0.00004635448,0.00009349991,0.0007288126,0.0001144704,0.00096592406],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000570874,0.000129053,0.00012440688,0.0002178823,0.004181625,0.0012890968,0.0013528441,0.00015971907,0.000058865757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059927587,0.00011744722,0.00007036464,0.00021205629,0.0007126259,0.0004567303,0.0000980788,0.0001918401,0.00020448072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033982217,0.000016605147,0.053278606,0.0000030452816,0.000047107213,0.000034670302,0.022386642,7.0336915e-7,0.00000934581,0.8481078,0.025465846,0.050646193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013590003,0.000007220077,0.3203692,0.000002780525,0.0000030364304,9.1380525e-7,0.01048102,0.000008630918,0.0000010972034,0.0045204433,0.66433346,0.00013630558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7890725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96580726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8435874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078400574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005109258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594053673","doi":"10.1057/s41308-018-0065-5","title":"Globalization and Social Change: Gender-Specific Effects of Trade Liberalization in Indonesia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IMF Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit Antwerpen; International Development Research Centre; Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg; Government of the United Kingdom; Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam; Universität Bielefeld; Department for International Development","keywords":"Economics; Tariff; Liberalization; Globalization; Free trade; Fertility; International economics; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Population; Market economy; Demography","score_opus":0.04807843142877055,"score_gpt":0.3094481925805769,"score_spread":0.2613697611518063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594053673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89457047,0.09352687,0.00061921915,0.002171627,0.0012099507,0.0019057014,0.000017245446,0.000053384214,0.005925517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8361004,0.16271463,0.000056352215,0.00070095336,0.00036418877,0.000025450272,0.00001532409,0.000009350443,0.000013321845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990859,0.00019784065,0.00029421915,0.00018405731,0.0000704696,0.00016750155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999659,0.00003344692,0.00016051007,0.00008951727,0.000021371427,0.00003615354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042396906,0.00008916257,0.00026964847,0.00004931477,0.0001117599,0.000024750956,0.00011025234,0.00008781693,0.000029667224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015168481,0.000095759824,0.000040394185,0.00016665272,0.00015652811,0.00020281489,0.000018491035,0.000036083304,0.00001343338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018590574,0.0001610462,0.31010547,0.0069043417,0.0000630276,0.0000039416495,0.09911697,0.0000037261216,0.000106397085,0.44602263,0.0077734,0.12972048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007727752,0.000059309994,0.87628627,0.000760962,0.000056156252,0.0000016988802,0.0007548111,0.00020399164,0.000016790487,0.003933177,0.11680291,0.000351119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021938533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052923954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5661808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012615621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060295555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39049724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594599868","doi":"10.20547/jms.2014.1704102","title":"GSP Plus Status and Income Distribution: A CGE Model for Pakistan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Sciences","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computable general equilibrium; Income distribution; Distribution (mathematics); Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Macroeconomics; Inequality","score_opus":0.044776117208742715,"score_gpt":0.3560104108956639,"score_spread":0.3112342936869212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594599868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8336386,0.0004448856,0.14065391,0.0041841995,0.0010596832,0.0004113189,0.000054255517,0.000017573355,0.019535553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934858,0.0011828175,0.0039497414,0.00008976457,0.00013111113,0.0000032004264,9.012588e-7,0.0000029158828,0.001153715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864775,0.000034801637,0.00025722486,0.00014794424,0.0005749195,0.00033736276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990909,0.00005124367,0.0004284901,0.00013607624,0.00013911193,0.00015414566],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022188707,0.00007861356,0.00015205801,0.00007577521,0.0022851985,0.00065573276,0.0006512369,0.00003508611,0.0000052881232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011231591,0.00006255239,0.0000638783,0.0001080275,0.0007751392,0.00070984784,0.000114552604,0.000066210596,8.3535633e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008152008,0.000108265325,0.2190464,0.00011186035,0.00010362909,0.000024646553,0.013037744,0.007299927,0.0000056784493,0.7474307,0.0031955345,0.009554128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025146832,0.00041133637,0.6032367,0.00014469808,0.00015886377,0.0000044931476,0.06410092,0.12813604,0.000002212756,0.15955345,0.04126167,0.0004749334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017406326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005816573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5878772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012654955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018820628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99901366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595030261","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.44.3.311","title":"Is Men’s Share of Housework Reduced by ‘Gender Deviance Neutralization'? Evidence From Seven Countries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deviance (statistics); Wife; Domestic violence; Gender role; Sociology; Psychology; Demographic economics; Gender studies; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Economics; Political science; Medicine; Law; Environmental health","score_opus":0.1450758763125767,"score_gpt":0.3833836817387344,"score_spread":0.23830780542615768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595030261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94991994,0.045181707,0.0009801245,0.0012809949,0.000593238,0.0002964361,0.000099250276,0.000019253806,0.0016290762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828531,0.014772433,0.0008907829,0.00061857497,0.00025376654,0.000014744094,0.0000027562971,0.000012284234,0.0005815563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974911,0.00037036758,0.00078156975,0.00021510165,0.00082645554,0.00031537487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954175,0.0007810433,0.000922667,0.00017216799,0.0025786003,0.00012804319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048709963,0.00022944939,0.0007695893,0.00009015512,0.00044392503,0.00009898277,0.0004923621,0.000097923934,0.00009075898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021844287,0.0001865814,0.00014681336,0.0004107494,0.00057154073,0.00090303615,0.00006788733,0.00022397347,0.000027303682],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055010292,0.00009203681,0.12724115,0.000043968783,0.0008614753,0.000002839891,0.38644615,0.00026235264,0.0018031428,0.0011818308,0.48195454,0.000055490713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005807937,0.00019277097,0.5199874,0.00066175865,0.00018157574,0.0000011050956,0.45803526,0.00015340785,0.0009060171,0.0068057035,0.012104387,0.00038981895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064366986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017439717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46985018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020128077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032940498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76085687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595336389","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.40.3.355","title":"One Pot or Two Pot Strategies? Income Pooling in Married and Unmarried Households in Comparative Perspective","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Pooling; Institutionalisation; Demographic economics; Marital status; Economics; Perspective (graphical); Welfare; Economic growth; Sociology; Population; Geography; Political science; Demography","score_opus":0.14991232338358768,"score_gpt":0.41885016294086125,"score_spread":0.2689378395572736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595336389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766041,0.006454782,0.00014335121,0.00075718533,0.0003163405,0.00040452683,0.000011534326,0.000022797569,0.015285372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951733,0.002879261,0.0012538449,0.000324399,0.00023666589,0.000006533738,7.190891e-7,0.000010283547,0.00011502946],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966978,0.00075046386,0.00096968946,0.00033410644,0.0006832879,0.0005646701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742836,0.00065895444,0.00061820436,0.00013454574,0.000973705,0.0001862307],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013621312,0.00034792637,0.0014154883,0.0004785996,0.00042087425,0.00016576308,0.000347359,0.00010972934,0.000005391153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001412103,0.00029449767,0.00010673413,0.0011394471,0.0007208539,0.0008591926,0.000072628965,0.0007051262,0.0000023288364],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019373476,0.0007520283,0.08753358,0.000029762958,0.00071908423,0.00019939298,0.8220281,0.0050060228,0.000921102,0.0803488,0.0003473339,0.00017747222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018766179,0.00054054154,0.46364126,0.00017079271,0.000037756363,0.0000039454067,0.51432246,0.000114104245,0.000011492586,0.018972944,0.00008317564,0.00022492757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075474556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014050217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3761077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078782544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071830215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596278184","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.38.2.366","title":"Thistle, Susan. <b>FROM MARRIAGE TO THE MARKET: THE TRANSFORMATION OF WOMEN'S LIVES AND WORK</b>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thistle; Women's Lives; Work (physics); Gender studies; Sociology; Marriage market; Economics; Labour economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.057579458903687646,"score_gpt":0.3410648012550671,"score_spread":0.28348534235137945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596278184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9727813,0.007127337,0.0017908631,0.0018163467,0.00055933,0.00024946418,0.000009964717,0.0000058183373,0.01565955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99481916,0.0037932242,0.00032414947,0.0004744569,0.00024808288,0.000004369537,2.5831085e-7,0.0000045064876,0.00033176888],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982741,0.00034699138,0.0005026292,0.00008796994,0.0005033907,0.00028494798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975915,0.0013437311,0.00035259163,0.00010373697,0.0005119437,0.00009649825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031765301,0.00012916705,0.00039075964,0.000085536056,0.0005668008,0.000048875423,0.00030809297,0.00003569399,0.00001337911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012711697,0.00006869372,0.00008375115,0.00040719187,0.00053765456,0.0001976486,0.000041477822,0.00020226932,0.0000023486332],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003085072,0.00005622351,0.017698541,0.000010859524,0.00041865543,0.0000036220179,0.9646644,0.000082226135,0.00020833327,0.0038908373,0.011241444,0.001416333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021760512,0.00011858159,0.38785803,0.00004098765,0.000036569687,6.6084397e-7,0.58572906,0.0000068242557,0.000022562685,0.0016323839,0.024268085,0.000068631234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000090136295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007457336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37893534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015673217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008380778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4359431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596440407","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.32.3.347","title":"Dual-Resident Marriages in Thailand: A Comparison of Two Cultural Groups of Women","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marital status; Cultural group selection; Dual (grammatical number); Agrarian society; Socioeconomics; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Demography; Population; Social psychology; Geography; Agriculture; Ethnic group; Anthropology","score_opus":0.10872201376979189,"score_gpt":0.41684321762959164,"score_spread":0.30812120385979974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596440407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860668,0.008991428,0.00007569978,0.00018502165,0.00051989226,0.00016734118,0.0000071885706,0.000006365269,0.0039802315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99496686,0.004248977,0.0003095783,0.00004378759,0.00018594546,0.0000056283093,6.727857e-7,0.0000056537147,0.00023289694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971948,0.0004886789,0.0010627134,0.00013429757,0.0007277976,0.00039166774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731165,0.0004925078,0.0010247915,0.000106292166,0.0009539552,0.00011079528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013547026,0.00018574054,0.0012224232,0.00023637523,0.00016317758,0.00002485038,0.00027941447,0.000054879758,0.000012077626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017034776,0.00013864877,0.00015275198,0.00053697976,0.00060793624,0.00030094126,0.00007592348,0.00025065654,0.0000020476045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016056861,0.000216221,0.58893776,0.00002276472,0.00030732166,0.000014986163,0.40377322,0.00086168287,0.0008504376,0.0027708726,0.002013057,0.00007109588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009923506,0.00030070244,0.44657683,0.00010118723,0.000030709474,0.0000021523913,0.5486757,0.000048867758,0.00006115292,0.0021304314,0.00097500946,0.0001049164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055887346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003173296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14490248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035737763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016847027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56539327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596590837","doi":"","title":"Four perspectives on population policies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Environment and Pollution","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Economic growth; Blame; Sustainable development; Empowerment; Solidarity; Political science; Rhetoric; Development economics; Sociology; Political economy; Economics; Geography; Politics; Social psychology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.01589586534859593,"score_gpt":0.2725916292059188,"score_spread":0.25669576385732285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596590837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98787683,0.00010978241,0.0027583663,0.004015726,0.00052064675,0.00003303801,0.0000040147434,0.0000050857666,0.0046764994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971844,0.0012138683,0.0002630702,0.00021455633,0.00078143383,3.7964585e-7,0.0000019730549,0.0000033999338,0.0003369004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992376,0.000081419275,0.00014296504,0.00006293034,0.00039485295,0.00008024359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997009,0.000028714867,0.00014855324,0.00003366406,0.000037887658,0.000050268147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003549509,0.000050679577,0.000064157786,0.00010619604,0.00011488171,0.000042071326,0.00010104111,0.0000407086,0.000042183925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007406037,0.00004536719,0.000043270946,0.000023393384,0.0000745782,0.00015582737,0.000012364331,0.00006866078,0.000006488397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014720537,0.00023659735,0.35465637,0.000002998817,0.00015214288,0.0000056412114,0.044906937,0.0037142506,0.0014245048,0.5640125,0.00062351034,0.030117322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035140832,0.000118444,0.9603051,0.000015855661,0.000013412734,0.0000061732935,0.008442074,0.00023338293,0.000010291836,0.007308653,0.023119584,0.000075637334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021136831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031126347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6056487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016367044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011661888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18500203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596987114","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.37.4.563","title":"The Ways of Adaptation and Allocation Work Time from Russian Households in the Period of Crisis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unpaid work; Work (physics); Time allocation; Russian federation; Demographic economics; Paid work; Economics; Adaptation (eye); Duration (music); Economic growth; Development economics; Labour economics; Economic policy; Working hours; Psychology","score_opus":0.10135641555652637,"score_gpt":0.31986818027122005,"score_spread":0.2185117647146937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596987114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98517877,0.007769736,0.0004477209,0.0045771613,0.00011759804,0.00011972914,0.000006283921,0.0000028416505,0.0017801825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99783474,0.0013323299,0.000492179,0.00017664302,0.00012914234,0.0000028294442,8.6422875e-7,0.000003087029,0.000028175318],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985721,0.00035628604,0.0004684262,0.000070945374,0.00041266953,0.00011956342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984213,0.0006488336,0.00051028305,0.000081014994,0.0003236516,0.000014901418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008886467,0.00008623535,0.00030763267,0.000050800754,0.00030858716,0.00003466602,0.00019916841,0.000040587227,7.0214816e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050758863,0.000048839458,0.00006033995,0.0003258978,0.0004352492,0.0001360213,0.00001878066,0.00013728728,5.4973583e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019408869,0.00022567078,0.12845628,0.000014194283,0.0004076235,0.0000059556883,0.81771547,0.0036850846,0.00056848914,0.028748164,0.019482598,0.0004963701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002183574,0.00007587508,0.6220275,0.000031883585,0.00003833034,2.8390005e-7,0.36851618,0.00011018186,0.000014304992,0.007941542,0.0009800467,0.000045485343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007273124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014210962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49357125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044236767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008123037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23734342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598304869","doi":"10.1093/socpro/spw040","title":"Basic Income in a Small Town: Understanding the Elusive Effects on Work","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Problems","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Payment; Investment (military); Demographic economics; Low income; Economics; Basic income; Income Support; Labour economics; Sociology; Geography; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.05946459776852767,"score_gpt":0.2969334478664221,"score_spread":0.23746885009789445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598304869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85750675,0.00008488908,0.000544657,0.007662256,0.0014148786,0.0009488084,0.000004783484,0.00007467092,0.13175829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977972,0.000054938453,0.000029786032,0.000394671,0.0006569498,0.00004045987,0.0000015992215,0.000016021804,0.0010083603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985581,0.00026057282,0.00016052289,0.00024147693,0.00028575317,0.00049358304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919575,0.00028309587,0.00016559876,0.000248505,0.000038505383,0.000068524416],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010745259,0.000137955,0.00018920773,0.000053429325,0.0033861564,0.00034359552,0.0006524455,0.00018892522,0.000014464792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028664846,0.00011058019,0.00009021654,0.00025170558,0.00042997522,0.0001290881,0.000110667395,0.0003397441,0.000026397342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040832994,0.00009483299,0.26854783,0.00006279941,0.000055008913,0.000022497652,0.2508243,0.00010461507,0.000040092204,0.47426078,0.0006598417,0.0052865664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011832879,0.000097403754,0.48295814,0.00023717713,0.000029949353,1.9926917e-7,0.047845844,0.00005790859,0.000004719727,0.46487084,0.0022637276,0.00045082174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023229714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017884877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21441029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052607124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017011871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99801815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598950602","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-51577-9_2","title":"Explaining the Low Rate of Female Labor Force Participation in the Middle East and North Africa","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Middle East; Islam; Fertility; Demographic economics; Panel data; Persistence (discontinuity); Total fertility rate; Economics; Geography; Development economics; Political science; Demography; Sociology; Population; Research methodology; Econometrics; Engineering; Family planning","score_opus":0.12620241772028798,"score_gpt":0.2886353748201152,"score_spread":0.16243295709982722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598950602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24336246,0.00033292396,0.0000671015,0.0004376445,0.00017693796,0.0004200549,0.00003621519,0.000022495633,0.7551442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87025195,0.0004935252,0.00003489911,0.00015429688,0.000109135864,0.00001696573,0.000008001084,0.000014681965,0.12891652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990812,0.00009400154,0.0002050987,0.00017458785,0.00022912967,0.00021597512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991277,0.00020833855,0.00022281572,0.00030246054,0.00009932022,0.00003936001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083394937,0.00012923844,0.0001811757,0.000030926694,0.0004252207,0.00009576824,0.00036732756,0.0001306885,0.000027502492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001048094,0.0000764156,0.000045677527,0.000033533717,0.0003597688,0.00010108051,0.000047810245,0.00016366834,0.0000052587006],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014174033,0.000023330254,0.014414913,0.000036917947,0.000028255383,0.0000044137064,0.43747047,0.000035572284,0.0000035748121,0.5465164,0.00021352641,0.0012384375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012543682,0.00024662507,0.26335704,0.00051825726,0.00028349485,0.0000014613652,0.5049699,0.0018772929,0.000003885196,0.064793155,0.16147426,0.0012202802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059815793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03514091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6268895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019660229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000114824055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98246527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600774909","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.001","title":"The Development Benefits of Maternity Leave","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Developing country; Salary; Per capita; Infant mortality; Total fertility rate; Demographic economics; Economics; Child mortality; Developed country; Demography; Medicine; Family planning; Population; Economic growth; Environmental health","score_opus":0.04386247908025412,"score_gpt":0.2946431799296277,"score_spread":0.25078070084937354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600774909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9080969,0.0001618374,0.00012131467,0.00072782254,0.0010257137,0.00022789622,0.000002659019,0.000040770068,0.08959509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639636,0.000108592714,0.0058230944,0.00007534424,0.00007726494,0.000025777372,0.0000029916275,0.00001078798,0.029912543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983847,0.000056661695,0.00037092192,0.00020149481,0.0005657009,0.00042048513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897057,0.00007915811,0.00026304508,0.00039788874,0.00017472419,0.00011464037],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001204839,0.00013131798,0.0001567223,0.000057691035,0.0037235792,0.00021582255,0.0008769367,0.000051252544,0.00004574868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011758919,0.00010018339,0.000035856137,0.00010132143,0.00028927068,0.000107442516,0.00023574568,0.00009953109,0.00009629382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020610949,0.000098983066,0.7395357,0.00002653664,0.00010742171,0.0000026997193,0.06710313,0.000026080885,0.000024854837,0.050842773,0.0016615943,0.14054962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011559849,0.000002513339,0.726601,0.000025243218,0.0000032309263,1.1603469e-7,0.0020548145,0.0000025450775,0.00051779684,0.0003096811,0.2702404,0.00012708704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032134666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043326367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2685788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019721566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007963951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99757344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601038279","doi":"10.1086/711491","title":"The Cobb-Douglas Marriage Matching Function: Marriage Matching with Peer and Scale Effects","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); CobB; Population; Scale (ratio); Function (biology); Economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Geography; Statistics; Demography; Biology; Evolutionary biology; Cartography","score_opus":0.012409738276445583,"score_gpt":0.2453648973795955,"score_spread":0.2329551591031499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601038279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783212,0.0012019255,0.0020807772,0.007492986,0.006390874,0.00039796415,0.00006998712,0.000036441084,0.004007839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98270935,0.0066556036,0.003944811,0.0012469692,0.004102922,0.000012375256,0.000011552674,0.00008709735,0.001229337],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976695,0.00034781455,0.0007522107,0.00037594858,0.00040692382,0.00044757008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997022,0.0006558884,0.0012334303,0.00033127083,0.000388715,0.0003687209],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023338208,0.0003592693,0.000688764,0.0001043238,0.0009378616,0.0011249522,0.00071630126,0.0003473529,0.00002181945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014330678,0.00027495142,0.00020268424,0.00013349426,0.00028654913,0.00037661422,0.00035493035,0.0014427393,0.000009400436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047864034,0.0006204728,0.22792462,0.0030848922,0.007519612,0.00093575707,0.39702365,0.06413463,0.00053585524,0.23849805,0.019334272,0.035601787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051402,0.00096480583,0.24171212,0.001209908,0.0016057894,0.0001952577,0.12798731,0.0015001899,0.000038949674,0.42185616,0.19536746,0.0024218576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043429612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00277513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26903635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034365585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093820324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601409368","doi":"10.1257/aer.p20171098","title":"Economic Development and the Regulation of Morally Contentious Activities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Economics; Conceptual framework; Positive economics; Public economics; Development economics; Sociology; Social science; Biology; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.02869490209301646,"score_gpt":0.2939855542649852,"score_spread":0.26529065217196873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601409368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9459409,0.008357239,0.000045334473,0.0026119738,0.00028018045,0.0004895622,0.0000075382877,0.000014433794,0.04225281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9208175,0.0777568,0.00028907458,0.0003469055,0.00005136423,0.000022537148,0.000002207335,0.000006175338,0.00070744596],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992807,0.00010759742,0.00028710256,0.000146784,0.0000443614,0.00013348296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988968,0.000084719555,0.0006603739,0.00030178996,0.000014991059,0.00004137692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008019518,0.000080519254,0.00037381207,0.00001636124,0.00044147088,0.00007278348,0.0002866632,0.000016962638,0.000038306887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049319377,0.00006333717,0.000063976375,0.000010906259,0.0015079168,0.00018600558,0.00005174914,0.00003840525,0.000022402044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028033111,0.000018251145,0.08917529,0.00028655774,0.00019161169,3.747489e-7,0.009355464,0.000024921957,0.000010120168,0.19852324,0.0014197854,0.70096636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010025104,0.00003694078,0.7466532,0.00046756648,0.00012208037,0.0000027811463,0.010138426,0.0002924713,0.000013872373,0.00269116,0.23818599,0.00039299694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040681856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048958263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7005733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011596679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024242715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6149907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601496925","doi":"","title":"A Quarter Century of Changes in Labor Force Participation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multinomial logistic regression; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Government (linguistics); Private sector; Panel data; Economic growth; Geography; Econometrics","score_opus":0.05821139046471249,"score_gpt":0.3652457556201103,"score_spread":0.30703436515539784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601496925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95180726,0.0002260584,0.0000016169625,0.0007741971,0.00055593695,0.0007135469,0.000075430944,0.000031097185,0.045814835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98326254,0.015257923,0.00015741753,0.00006176575,0.00022388411,0.00018903278,0.000042718424,0.00003444952,0.00077028765],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971933,0.0006388273,0.0004867488,0.0005190116,0.00039167682,0.00077043497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850804,0.0003014502,0.00019266394,0.00051087997,0.00029071822,0.00019626951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037275334,0.00017531315,0.00042569716,0.0004698167,0.00007941008,0.00007364345,0.0005531359,0.000498728,0.000026945232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067034515,0.00019973105,0.00007052872,0.00027121665,0.00038647657,0.00009591661,0.00034463135,0.0008030598,0.0000037802279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025447176,0.00079088594,0.6690701,0.000561426,0.00011848023,0.000030984713,0.1984187,0.013756537,0.00021771545,0.012722319,0.00033818267,0.10372019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031801548,0.0005127865,0.5448239,0.0009057479,0.00004018682,0.0000010295577,0.3053608,0.031050734,0.00010331014,0.038996283,0.07324167,0.0017834157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020462803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06546058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124246225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010865554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013041114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9515923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601838066","doi":"","title":"The Barriers to Economic Self-Reliance: An Ethnographic Study of Low-Income Single Mothers in Prince George's County Maryland","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ohio State University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"George (robot); Ethnography; Low income; Sociology; Geography; Socioeconomics; History; Anthropology","score_opus":0.006889624897114711,"score_gpt":0.22178499017036052,"score_spread":0.21489536527324582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601838066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9116268,0.00008526112,0.000043480013,0.0005801849,0.00044793278,0.0006515224,0.000027830807,0.00008732177,0.086449675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99596155,0.0014422173,0.00016436417,0.0021255189,0.00016819326,0.0000128283245,0.00003200587,0.000008891398,0.00008443304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984793,0.00019862047,0.0005327347,0.00016773955,0.00019235314,0.00042924413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991791,0.00007058696,0.00019901026,0.00025180678,0.000024223142,0.00027526953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054267683,0.00016172914,0.0001990274,0.00013692313,0.000523898,0.00025417696,0.00038049833,0.00012072655,0.000028187853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011663507,0.00013644203,0.000041330954,0.00047855606,0.00009595364,0.004656395,0.000056173976,0.00018119738,0.000003932757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004417899,0.00043871757,0.5871748,0.000060049762,0.00008352767,0.0000025557408,0.12352416,0.020875677,0.000004709631,0.2565374,0.0016637935,0.009192814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026268882,0.00091491186,0.7393789,0.0001730649,0.000021298689,0.000001491433,0.017244045,0.008482678,0.00000478168,0.0025392647,0.22797978,0.00063289853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000052815103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024149222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25399816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037257105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001292122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55639446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604539924","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.41.1.19","title":"Is Justice Contextual? Married Women’s Perceptions of Fairness of the Division of Household Labor in 12 Nations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Distributive justice; Politics; Context (archaeology); Normative; Economic Justice; Economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.08951340579931076,"score_gpt":0.3715490063488895,"score_spread":0.2820356005495787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604539924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995185,0.00066351844,0.00015306524,0.000377132,0.00087649195,0.00018982732,0.000115452145,0.0000039528204,0.0024355375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982709,0.0010201596,0.00025954092,0.00010261109,0.00007206252,0.00000679112,3.2231162e-7,0.000005831418,0.00026177533],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798423,0.00030294215,0.00078294304,0.000103353785,0.00063174736,0.0001947982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649143,0.0007836241,0.00089406315,0.00016255322,0.0016098698,0.00005844331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010019077,0.00012809045,0.0006295288,0.00023623822,0.0003122369,0.0000118232465,0.00040688383,0.000074830255,0.000014890063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005267556,0.00008769944,0.00014503842,0.0006822407,0.001061379,0.00020391551,0.000087464636,0.00033128503,5.87855e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006780272,0.0004373268,0.4096063,0.00009315613,0.0002794292,8.48777e-7,0.55135673,0.0004930383,0.013984521,0.021811517,0.00178903,0.00008031005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040108076,0.00008309335,0.5895915,0.000080556216,0.00004971322,2.666584e-7,0.4081826,0.000024200432,0.00010571121,0.0010265321,0.00040008707,0.00005463653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020387971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044670524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17998523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010308271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031178392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3910695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604872306","doi":"","title":"State's Stepping out of the Dominant Values in Women Empowerment Policy: The Experience of Andhra Pradesh, India","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Development Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Wage; Welfare; Empowerment; Poverty; Social security; Public policy; Welfare state; Economics; Social policy; Government (linguistics); Economic growth; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Development economics; Political science; Law; Politics; Market economy","score_opus":0.03366216429487405,"score_gpt":0.33435205132550283,"score_spread":0.30068988703062877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604872306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935131,0.00021888339,0.000016070953,0.0012518823,0.00051579357,0.000398076,0.0000070146984,0.000013962805,0.00406522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974033,0.00019423416,0.00024293864,0.00015566818,0.00011088095,0.000053842577,0.0000013567023,0.000009617803,0.0018281298],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978358,0.0003278175,0.0004298472,0.00017802264,0.0007844919,0.00044399386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929947,0.000060681185,0.00025391826,0.00014785031,0.00016107428,0.00007702182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014643038,0.00013441776,0.00026325436,0.00007968221,0.00042491718,0.00004234272,0.0005626791,0.00008650523,0.000009632635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023024171,0.00008909583,0.00004419754,0.00054633245,0.0006250315,0.00012649751,0.00018470285,0.000111863985,0.0000031582945],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016813863,0.00006116538,0.07159614,0.000012089541,0.000020652487,6.3177987e-7,0.92421424,0.0000051322845,0.00017262294,0.002479432,0.00021735705,0.0012036915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034073106,0.000021292071,0.31247798,0.000043567226,0.00000331579,6.396941e-8,0.66225445,0.000002283373,0.00080067676,0.0041612242,0.01975223,0.00014221025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030319376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016415238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26195982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053468003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019784928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4583403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606834453","doi":"10.7202/1034399ar","title":"Les politiques américaines contre la pauvreté : quelques propositions","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Community Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.054232456329954666,"score_gpt":0.3668089438962584,"score_spread":0.31257648756630374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606834453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26210764,0.10058999,0.0062271263,0.18470776,0.002654313,0.0011378237,0.00045615676,0.00015918656,0.44196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75257194,0.22378314,0.0034301037,0.0021643129,0.0001442753,0.000059950544,0.00007310422,0.000018287652,0.017754892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963981,0.0018521106,0.00074397126,0.00012640217,0.0006056786,0.00027373742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968859,0.0010235714,0.00036848805,0.00029269015,0.0013044382,0.00012489402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017708837,0.0002185004,0.00038502258,0.00009499236,0.00045106115,0.000041525444,0.00092076464,0.00013367571,0.0006269407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008352597,0.00016696147,0.0001540471,0.00021256962,0.0007393825,0.00028109024,0.00024214543,0.00028173265,0.00006223557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056752783,0.0004985634,0.008532716,0.0016505637,0.00025236208,0.0000032244645,0.012196066,2.2075349e-7,0.000036499234,0.66577595,0.0053933524,0.3056548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003216475,0.000052305375,0.1740953,0.023651669,0.00006136629,0.000012214964,0.0071523436,0.000002493093,0.00010564311,0.024033565,0.7701567,0.0003547881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044441647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019059838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7647633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055916887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067745085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6864561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606839062","doi":"","title":"Child Poverty and Family Structure during the Recession in English-Speaking Liberal Welfare States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Recession; Welfare; Welfare reform; Demographic economics; Great recession; Welfare state; Development economics; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Labour economics","score_opus":0.008947034906659839,"score_gpt":0.2396441180678164,"score_spread":0.23069708316115656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606839062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9582143,0.0024605417,0.000008921383,0.0011471919,0.0070482413,0.00076726184,0.00046489955,0.00022532887,0.029663354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99460536,0.002014401,0.000307073,0.00064272684,0.0017762454,0.00003340787,0.000083677725,0.00006675596,0.00047036505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961744,0.000549106,0.00072769873,0.0011117143,0.00052283757,0.0009142216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800533,0.00019906725,0.00053055707,0.0007345944,0.00025923506,0.00027123647],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009053984,0.0006135588,0.0007032743,0.0003012855,0.0016481278,0.0004986592,0.0009553304,0.00091939577,0.00042615816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003009863,0.0005068461,0.00018907229,0.00030983568,0.0010786946,0.0004213976,0.00084212935,0.0017510441,0.000011411958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027986462,0.000033897686,0.9267152,0.00010815374,0.000066371,0.000015004488,0.07087684,0.00013137405,0.000018355371,0.00068303634,0.00090676825,0.00041704834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006568904,0.000026022117,0.94420314,0.00043395357,0.000044710952,0.000009829623,0.02920836,0.00020589728,0.00001142489,0.0018347178,0.022546517,0.00081855623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002671535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018471414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041668475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006784045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005262226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609425667","doi":"10.3138/9781442679795","title":"Set Adrift: Fishing Families","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fishing; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.03437105451196927,"score_gpt":0.2704879198691729,"score_spread":0.23611686535720366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609425667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003263182,0.0005667314,0.00015020614,0.00043666628,0.0012538034,0.00024216135,0.000103238206,0.00028607278,0.9966348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015020757,0.0039920313,0.00033675114,0.0010063198,0.0010789298,0.0000074655795,0.000115139606,0.000043148004,0.99191815],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980269,0.00008832084,0.0002762757,0.00040407528,0.0006841709,0.000520232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990776,0.00016367472,0.00012586504,0.00032957917,0.0001249773,0.00017831061],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036637075,0.00028191405,0.00035056777,0.00013425779,0.0005626804,0.00021800751,0.00059043785,0.00071739446,0.0019415924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085825304,0.00027793166,0.00017945666,0.00013750826,0.0003006478,0.00018320011,0.00008580568,0.00045638002,0.0006527359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.7307063e-7,0.000010672329,0.00064757006,0.000030637384,0.000040271763,0.000014288305,0.035181317,0.0000062392123,3.406924e-7,0.09573411,0.86666304,0.0016706354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008508101,0.000013918894,0.0003586861,0.000038542865,0.000033524375,5.518645e-7,0.016307332,0.00005745537,1.03301915e-7,0.010773956,0.9719501,0.00038074862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002110297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012937596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10528706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000301141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056392106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609888406","doi":"","title":"How Much Does Work Matter for Inequality? Time, Money and Inequality in International Perspective","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Essex","keywords":"Inequality; Workforce; Distribution (mathematics); Demographic economics; Economics; Poverty; Income distribution; Economic inequality; Population; Work (physics); Labour economics; Economic growth; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.025672325743655713,"score_gpt":0.2870756224510407,"score_spread":0.261403296707385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609888406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.959333,0.0007309321,0.0005790089,0.007614444,0.004372172,0.0012289302,0.0010361593,0.00012360499,0.024981774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98352313,0.00045319673,0.0022666052,0.00068467454,0.0011457643,0.0002631085,0.00010021382,0.000055701246,0.011507625],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963609,0.00051303004,0.00072476675,0.0012155047,0.00047587126,0.00070990506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973543,0.0007762362,0.0005510889,0.0005642582,0.0004741906,0.00027988985],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016406679,0.00053374196,0.00084468175,0.00044341807,0.00036044908,0.00055496854,0.0007714824,0.00082366,0.001018685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008769439,0.0005294427,0.00029277898,0.00024156562,0.000888013,0.00042172562,0.00047140883,0.0008555866,0.00009019145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034991033,0.00016117471,0.9607993,0.00007644311,0.00015362308,0.000007041823,0.024128603,0.000012734953,0.0000071518916,0.010156309,0.004289868,0.00017278938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018251536,0.00004533941,0.8701606,0.00030185698,0.00010716529,0.0000054788075,0.062240425,0.00074648246,0.000009836659,0.04778886,0.014973011,0.0017958006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027203923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046818503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090638675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013766751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005130778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610848160","doi":"","title":"Did Tax Cuts on Earned Income Reduce Welfare Participation in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Economics; Tax rate; Percentage point; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Point (geometry); Marginal utility; Income tax; Monetary economics; Public economics; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.016258684941674994,"score_gpt":0.29975946060942893,"score_spread":0.28350077566775395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610848160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98277503,0.00013618225,0.000055808083,0.00879327,0.00070539536,0.00010684981,0.000005417843,0.000008734804,0.0074132923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960579,0.00091220636,0.000010279665,0.00010741831,0.00027297856,0.0000056434224,0.0000024945157,0.0000117866475,0.002619292],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971088,0.00018491197,0.00023067847,0.00017459327,0.0004844874,0.0018165284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992589,0.00003230281,0.00023948943,0.00023802818,0.00008773384,0.0001435792],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014624146,0.000110844005,0.00015146504,0.0000653748,0.00155018,0.00014639068,0.00052156614,0.000073924464,0.000029747387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034260005,0.000106882944,0.000043229622,0.000110287765,0.00007264275,0.00024470533,0.0000292802,0.0010541393,0.000008499975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006992283,0.00008986081,0.72541595,0.000004668439,0.000058672114,0.000028135226,0.0037463065,0.0004254549,0.00005228256,0.25201935,0.0002238944,0.017865513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007370281,0.00013306002,0.91784513,0.00002903409,0.000016293081,0.000007925703,0.025402112,0.00022144154,0.000012113089,0.04928388,0.00605471,0.00025726878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8940949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20273545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00441958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010906326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611826962","doi":"10.3386/w23372","title":"Infant Mortality and the Repeal of Federal Prohibition","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Demography; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.3856745201903168,"score_gpt":0.5406530412975813,"score_spread":0.1549785211072645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611826962","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11331895,0.0004770525,0.0000025233367,0.0010034731,0.00045675045,0.0007299128,0.00014454062,0.0000066175094,0.8838602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98547244,0.0046129627,0.000041882457,0.00000971374,0.00082940096,0.00004829552,0.00013383938,0.000011631685,0.008839818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966491,0.0004643384,0.00054415816,0.00031580968,0.0017524275,0.0002741598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958637,0.0007909055,0.00057214557,0.00032081318,0.0023785909,0.0000738826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016931225,0.00011045609,0.0003980784,0.00020588932,0.0007148915,0.00014102779,0.0004927165,0.00031659837,0.00006808688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035858061,0.00008842238,0.00013369926,0.000064823646,0.0024047536,0.0001700852,0.00015853542,0.00045837247,0.000004241913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009433762,0.000062420004,0.05537662,0.00022300273,0.00024372821,0.0000018679964,0.0028162661,0.0000361445,0.000013382977,0.91438544,0.026049538,0.00069728313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012677049,0.00006900203,0.16696566,0.00014975593,0.00003615162,0.000005464106,0.0025773773,0.00042187577,0.0000105647005,0.8029054,0.025344806,0.00024624678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06977806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014735041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8750204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005616135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008954946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99666333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612030455","doi":"","title":"Educational Attainment and Family Gaps in Women's Wages: Evidence from Five Industrialized Countries","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Educational attainment; Developed country; Wage; Demographic economics; Developing country; Economics; Labour economics; Shock (circulatory); Population; Economic growth; Sociology; Demography; Medicine","score_opus":0.030760725946073448,"score_gpt":0.29433208917765563,"score_spread":0.2635713632315822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612030455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9723524,0.008701331,0.00003977393,0.002431928,0.006102029,0.0011189327,0.00058981124,0.000096312644,0.008567483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693955,0.021567767,0.00081818475,0.0012804121,0.002000228,0.0005344191,0.00013165771,0.0000570334,0.0042147804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521345,0.0007544962,0.001000632,0.0012832194,0.00077450497,0.0009737246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961045,0.0018393609,0.00064326543,0.00066616107,0.0002550578,0.00049170107],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019411353,0.00061195146,0.0010040404,0.00041374384,0.0005775515,0.00045429426,0.0008476663,0.0010996987,0.001909434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010383464,0.00070810056,0.00016474264,0.00032399638,0.0015307901,0.0004499468,0.00049189787,0.0011875049,0.00012570001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008007366,0.00012340631,0.9477725,0.00004877367,0.00013106916,0.000019841325,0.043134786,0.00008240638,0.000012825866,0.0020960267,0.0061714663,0.00032679312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015760682,0.00005961267,0.8798262,0.001053209,0.0000941249,0.000004153305,0.069154896,0.00009862306,0.0000027716692,0.013862168,0.033023037,0.0012451754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016461374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066287415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06794637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031739713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062138494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616479857","doi":"10.3368/jhr.52.1.0714-6474r1","title":"Identifying Sibling Influence on Teenage Substance Use","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Human Resources","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Library science; Sociology; Gerontology; Economic history; Psychology; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.05810981155877511,"score_gpt":0.3158313499852112,"score_spread":0.2577215384264361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616479857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965103,0.0003836865,0.00021893381,0.0005050278,0.00017293057,0.000063397536,0.0000020575314,0.000020332798,0.002123301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961875,0.00090899534,0.000065987595,0.00023612197,0.00034212103,3.947494e-7,5.586159e-8,0.000011540902,0.0022472679],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998288,0.00035212256,0.00033500267,0.00009032451,0.0006497342,0.00028486855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846995,0.00061463227,0.000418016,0.0001980404,0.00019898737,0.000100398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018803112,0.000099454584,0.0001534471,0.00014853777,0.00091936113,0.00017039388,0.0006990285,0.000055403543,0.000036702088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026468665,0.00005171812,0.00008364038,0.00023143692,0.00037081738,0.00047189696,0.000028881755,0.00020964442,0.000017423707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028193544,0.00019987617,0.4103531,0.00003651841,0.00020543918,0.00012471498,0.4500257,0.0011818156,0.09824035,0.032806188,0.0033587895,0.003185554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011773923,0.0003559734,0.87869185,0.0010220213,0.00011659061,0.00002090427,0.07476559,0.000008517021,0.0008259741,0.01616415,0.026398934,0.0004520686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022389389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009814834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4683388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008130544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038448045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70710754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617437151","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.05.009","title":"The impact of student debt on education, career, and marriage choices of female lawyers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Subsidy; Wage; Student debt; Economics; Promotion (chess); Labour economics; Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Finance; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04842993083372475,"score_gpt":0.3624111406487945,"score_spread":0.3139812098150697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617437151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7321107,0.030203704,5.215495e-7,0.00022848691,0.00033349416,0.00028820932,0.00001283797,0.0000048570946,0.23681721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8004059,0.19831264,0.0000128181955,0.00008408498,0.00010368265,0.0000027745848,0.0000015464298,0.000008640005,0.0010679093],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999118,0.0002698258,0.00028207267,0.00013845912,0.00006766673,0.00012397551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988861,0.00007761015,0.0004453893,0.00047661207,0.00004682828,0.00006742845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013727233,0.00008163303,0.00021274424,0.000014687234,0.000391884,0.00008450931,0.0005773843,0.000012863615,0.000035603767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001318715,0.000055850855,0.00009881847,0.000017406453,0.00026288725,0.00009863144,0.00006730583,0.000046775756,0.000035913374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008122162,0.0001197584,0.8323573,0.00052061025,0.0001715179,0.0000010884924,0.007868563,0.000025807189,0.000012563828,0.029636344,0.007949277,0.12132906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010050092,0.000046197474,0.94933236,0.0003861865,0.000026733329,2.987265e-7,0.0013876908,0.0000025020286,8.8802364e-7,0.00011302105,0.04852643,0.00007720947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001069486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004961958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2357493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064010026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020063377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30140945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619053719","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2017.1341242","title":"A tax dead on arrival: classical liberalism, inheritance, and social mobility","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Liberalism; Classical liberalism; Inequality; Social mobility; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.07988811400665848,"score_gpt":0.39213551185409085,"score_spread":0.3122473978474324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619053719","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118879385,0.0030593632,0.00010691825,0.5234509,0.0011769765,0.00048132412,0.00057932764,0.00006227186,0.35220355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863143,0.002144113,0.0001464523,0.009089564,0.0021147297,0.000020244554,0.000011747052,0.000012519139,0.00014635158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980247,0.00020325884,0.00039934792,0.00033098375,0.0006188982,0.00042281972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868286,0.00041525165,0.00009937499,0.00014395178,0.00036910758,0.00028943192],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052116247,0.00017329874,0.00043265423,0.000033101576,0.0011970326,0.00014379747,0.00039398848,0.00019618668,0.000087466695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026376268,0.00015936774,0.00018025882,0.00004465765,0.003417436,0.00021910058,0.00015147548,0.00030275658,0.000009710232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019071385,0.000157031,0.0025114354,0.0006170101,0.000023168433,0.0000043591044,0.0004525545,2.5365336e-9,0.000004826299,0.99426264,0.0007167857,0.0012311351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034675605,0.000078703364,0.07983022,0.0007121236,0.000062360814,0.0000017393055,0.00032672394,0.0000139135445,0.0000026816635,0.86458135,0.05379222,0.00025119862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002358937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002915701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8674349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009324506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010502517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621295890","doi":"10.1111/obes.12175","title":"Is the Quarter of Birth Endogenous? New Evidence from Taiwan, the US, and Indonesia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Instrumental variable; Demography; Odds; Earnings; Census; Population; Sample (material); Demographic economics; Economics; Geography; Medicine; Logistic regression; Econometrics; Sociology","score_opus":0.038157863297274636,"score_gpt":0.2590234351663031,"score_spread":0.22086557186902847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621295890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853277,0.0008187439,0.001308519,0.0081067085,0.00021580236,0.00021130372,0.0006732648,0.0000036208314,0.0033342969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733485,0.021149972,0.004521572,0.00038640905,0.00011478232,0.0000026630746,0.0000038075225,0.000008988221,0.00046331383],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926645,0.000055359847,0.00026600686,0.0001695625,0.00007311704,0.000169535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986362,0.00047363713,0.00038601138,0.00036238748,0.00006926658,0.0000724955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042982158,0.000101224934,0.00020957064,0.000014880027,0.00067230954,0.0001785699,0.0004080791,0.00006519112,0.00010412443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001555417,0.00007028589,0.00002987755,0.000014486182,0.00073088025,0.00003982155,0.00009479905,0.000083970066,0.000001946024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006629424,0.000038311155,0.6291225,0.00004673734,0.00013603254,0.0000026193766,0.03794793,0.00004210084,0.000029468367,0.298799,0.014937928,0.018831082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006860417,0.00017560119,0.5457128,0.000058527512,0.00011707868,0.0000024692592,0.013821185,0.0018574785,0.000023522147,0.06415625,0.3730857,0.00030332603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014473909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051603667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35814777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000127711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014648952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624580232","doi":"10.1177/2321022217696152","title":"Efficiency of Family Bargaining Models with Renegotiation: The Role of Transferable Utility across Periods","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Microeconomics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Technische Universität Dresden","keywords":"Inefficiency; Economics; Substitution (logic); Constant (computer programming); Microeconomics; Wage; Econometrics; Marginal cost; Marginal utility; Labour economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06024482054666278,"score_gpt":0.34102020002727207,"score_spread":0.28077537948060927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624580232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601386,0.0023990907,0.00047435288,0.00010105465,0.00020589941,0.00021830153,0.000049232807,0.000008447666,0.036405027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99647075,0.002699176,0.0006633991,0.00003601156,0.00003984351,0.000010503849,0.0000011274152,0.000008708615,0.00007045492],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892336,0.00007422683,0.00035689195,0.00022581249,0.00010618705,0.0003135121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990151,0.00011739346,0.00022721806,0.00044145566,0.00017193478,0.000026890475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010105238,0.00011913019,0.00033720993,0.000025437006,0.0010995623,0.00004907007,0.0006037851,0.00006919063,0.0000030118065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080400285,0.00009427006,0.00006412145,0.000074532276,0.0018960398,0.00022672211,0.000104181265,0.000117556425,6.584392e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009103211,0.00012336441,0.40597448,0.00005846997,0.00017235623,0.0000010176409,0.5375912,0.006721498,0.00081927143,0.043370787,0.000024419209,0.0050520883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008895543,0.0000981695,0.09757672,0.00007053758,0.00003419996,6.024361e-7,0.8694567,0.006824468,0.00056999666,0.023122324,0.0010848433,0.00027186342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022481855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0101696355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3318655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009065945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020435367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8457055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625735230","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-51149-8_4","title":"A Feminist View of Women and Development","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Wish; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychology; Art; Anthropology","score_opus":0.039842777216707946,"score_gpt":0.283040488093604,"score_spread":0.24319771087689604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625735230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012422671,0.00047584705,0.000027414353,0.000045759352,0.00018453447,0.00015262527,0.000010296071,0.000020615471,0.99784064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0246527,0.0023707347,0.0010198168,0.00016015311,0.00008128251,0.00000677282,0.000005995045,0.000016275353,0.97168624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908894,0.000009754589,0.00020168997,0.00019406798,0.00026705654,0.00023847568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938434,0.000031766427,0.00017417457,0.0001991373,0.00006579987,0.00014475983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045880952,0.00014036456,0.00030135282,0.000042496154,0.00035111263,0.000054021948,0.0002473478,0.00022566806,0.0004513147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022503778,0.00012717859,0.000030399036,0.000005407849,0.00037845498,0.00002608184,0.00008552906,0.000091648886,0.00003629094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032531816,0.000010998431,0.0014083206,0.0001004316,0.00007546494,0.0000045073657,0.064743325,2.9767772e-8,9.3335785e-7,0.8973124,0.0005931174,0.03574721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007578044,0.000013608503,0.0009627572,0.000050335,0.0000063707976,3.6100755e-7,0.0028148051,3.0882532e-7,3.5017788e-7,0.011523687,0.98438233,0.00016933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002092591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016248156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015783122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065734034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51861924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W262929796","doi":"","title":"CRDCN Synthesis Series / Série Synthèses du RCCDR","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Wage; Gender gap; Demographic economics; Economics; Labour economics; Gender pay gap; Sociology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.018041999973537035,"score_gpt":0.21904276415967308,"score_spread":0.20100076418613605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W262929796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14308597,0.00003840532,0.0020689892,0.0035491136,0.0030474637,0.00054944115,0.0001834892,0.0003865642,0.84709054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65784764,0.33560747,0.0015747187,0.00036007102,0.0010373198,0.0000054138795,0.000015843056,0.000073493036,0.0034780253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582964,0.0011798508,0.00033634083,0.0008688469,0.0006255642,0.0011597777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975376,0.0007909697,0.0002819302,0.0006582006,0.00038217916,0.0003490784],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072733825,0.0005594463,0.0006284508,0.004778741,0.0013519406,0.0002247929,0.0011327576,0.00057266327,0.0003532388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007728691,0.0006642822,0.0003765477,0.010506647,0.0013245107,0.0015124853,0.0003614484,0.0004209052,0.0002717354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032763195,0.0014995828,0.035786584,0.00071757473,0.00087368797,0.00059099676,0.1383422,0.00025475404,0.00002393572,0.6738086,0.0065447385,0.14122975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042226756,0.0002005103,0.0011458148,0.00015504575,0.0004091962,0.000012960305,0.035830807,0.0005806977,0.00007051607,0.000040958832,0.9603639,0.0007672779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15984498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092356935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9538192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000644594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011086264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2644506046","doi":"","title":"Key Concepts in Family Studies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Sociology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.1564576723535299,"score_gpt":0.4271016098192512,"score_spread":0.27064393746572135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2644506046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.924417,0.056102816,0.000084106185,0.0009885468,0.0017332307,0.0003445279,0.0000046006835,0.000022029102,0.016303146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752738,0.021446355,0.0010271216,0.0008305297,0.0004414132,0.000023543156,4.6067507e-7,0.000011517285,0.0009452631],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968505,0.0006261064,0.000966166,0.00022903518,0.000793453,0.00053474837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995716,0.0009548409,0.00062193425,0.00014999427,0.002401499,0.00015577348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011914363,0.000292962,0.0011761357,0.00028210893,0.0004901393,0.0000879727,0.00044684124,0.00009315852,0.0000124478765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041381974,0.00022505422,0.00019150598,0.00064017164,0.0012161965,0.00071333925,0.0001208034,0.00042659257,0.00007125502],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006961163,0.00032630423,0.16306762,0.00005342218,0.0016062041,0.000060959504,0.70713425,0.00064437796,0.0012473571,0.015389912,0.10959108,0.0008089107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007127012,0.00020191059,0.33142737,0.00013052361,0.000040171697,0.0000016187504,0.64855593,0.00002809029,0.000011351415,0.007671815,0.011009176,0.00020936714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033458334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010205015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16835974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039612592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029885018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91774446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2699937900","doi":"10.1111/jomf.12421","title":"Comparing Child Poverty Risk by Family Structure During the 2008 Recession","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marriage and the Family","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Recession; Poverty; Demographic economics; Welfare; Child poverty; Economics; Great recession; Development economics; Economic growth; Labour economics","score_opus":0.011977492842399143,"score_gpt":0.2523436564784774,"score_spread":0.24036616363607827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2699937900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97674596,0.0061324635,0.00007911499,0.0024679343,0.001127408,0.0001558727,0.000033229466,0.000009623565,0.013248419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98657197,0.011453674,0.000051611,0.00076626154,0.0006708178,8.059185e-7,8.9394916e-7,0.000012132841,0.0004718592],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823475,0.00045568694,0.00034326082,0.00014275587,0.0005277862,0.00029574428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833643,0.0001844807,0.000853751,0.00036770292,0.00012776424,0.00012984035],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016971165,0.00015419799,0.00035191214,0.00003830446,0.0042143683,0.00049378164,0.0009487083,0.00011932947,0.0000136080525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030064397,0.00007700967,0.00018197185,0.000072658935,0.0005295265,0.00039710544,0.00015158727,0.00068061665,0.0000019044805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022343805,0.00020836803,0.7883282,0.00009974606,0.003133548,0.00011995519,0.10149771,0.00044451107,0.007305575,0.0071388553,0.081254825,0.008234337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029455943,0.00004117364,0.941361,0.00006931121,0.0004717318,0.000024916992,0.02851788,0.00021185036,0.000024675768,0.0058599124,0.020254344,0.00021761804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019431185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052182627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15303281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044680528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007327947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2724840142","doi":"10.5539/mas.v11n8p7","title":"An Analysis of the Socio-Demographic Differences in Ecuadorian Economically Active Population between Genders","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of the Aegean; Universidad Politécnica Salesiana del Ecuador","keywords":"Poverty; Equity (law); Gender equity; Population; Socioeconomic status; Poverty level; Economic growth; Work (physics); Perception; Demographic economics; Socioeconomics; Geography; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.03434521816160976,"score_gpt":0.29737727588683915,"score_spread":0.2630320577252294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2724840142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99266464,0.000003273759,0.0022557061,0.00019266728,0.00012456614,0.00022468549,0.000022158458,0.000018233815,0.0044940882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99967647,0.000012611586,0.00018914361,0.000038296606,0.000047852438,0.000009380294,0.000004382846,0.000005140039,0.000016740742],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982554,0.00008401041,0.0002529442,0.00046844393,0.0005472954,0.00039194757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987449,0.00006127849,0.0003352991,0.0006648806,0.00006626184,0.00012740104],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012130851,0.00011599262,0.0002903451,0.00031732477,0.0019125217,0.00024894677,0.0019131646,0.000110921304,0.00000802216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006524918,0.00009429182,0.000103672755,0.000839169,0.00197789,0.00046523812,0.00012046833,0.00014586707,0.0000010506772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036787112,0.000025377461,0.9701158,0.000001295877,0.000029031962,6.9268786e-8,0.014816578,0.0003820703,0.0015685663,0.010361936,2.378036e-7,0.0026953567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010005888,0.000006313004,0.94211036,0.0000021975059,0.00007164853,7.8749895e-9,0.0072716502,0.028740006,0.00003097613,0.021550065,0.0000012335978,0.0001155006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020446079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028357936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018566943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025913547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735442608","doi":"10.1016/j.labeco.2017.05.004","title":"Women make houses, women make homes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Labour economics; Work (physics); Instrumental variable; Term (time); Fertility; Demographic economics; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.020901428364896068,"score_gpt":0.2558550384071622,"score_spread":0.23495361004226617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735442608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95374715,0.00007219674,0.000021097749,0.0009878331,0.0015886513,0.00018717826,0.0001569134,0.00012526102,0.043113746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682986,0.0022385886,0.00035092677,0.0010536538,0.0007234537,0.00005071795,0.000006525664,0.000043289743,0.027234225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812436,0.00006552432,0.00028756584,0.00040105137,0.00012375403,0.0009977394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983604,0.0000783106,0.00028961088,0.00082398544,0.00007103633,0.00037668398],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088233367,0.0002066167,0.00035078474,0.000073885385,0.0015013878,0.0008249394,0.0010919247,0.00022088148,0.00032237914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018562436,0.00023429525,0.00007492321,0.000060633567,0.000394989,0.00030396873,0.00019288526,0.00018101002,0.00024629812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003414964,0.00011184892,0.3173824,0.000034723616,0.00013216818,0.000014778655,0.072261475,0.00020044825,0.000014742527,0.58815503,0.00023552944,0.021422714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000693966,0.000049166796,0.35492623,0.0000067561414,0.000007794306,0.0000010510485,0.039655585,0.00005300521,0.000004418691,0.09842681,0.50569147,0.00048375851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017690228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0102087185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5054559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000783549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041934877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736014628","doi":"10.25336/p6r60w","title":"Handbook of Research on Gender and Economic Life","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.2569004138907278,"score_gpt":0.44839863925300194,"score_spread":0.19149822536227412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736014628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677653,0.0010604789,0.000001194953,0.00029859977,0.0004548987,0.00013884685,0.000012085994,0.0000037560255,0.03026487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99837273,0.0011003729,0.000034878278,0.000060295213,0.000125665,0.000006017513,0.0000024087178,0.000004189946,0.00029346478],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993426,0.00008000743,0.00011479622,0.00012953916,0.00011158678,0.00022142756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995213,0.000071652335,0.000049370174,0.00016518425,0.000064328444,0.0001281559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071363524,0.000043492102,0.00010610363,0.00017888169,0.00092602,0.000035305144,0.000119678436,0.00005976468,0.0000074120144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046563178,0.000046760768,0.000011570367,0.000039802144,0.00042079415,0.00009004271,0.000026447906,0.00007472825,0.000005416662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028899863,0.000002557878,0.9223566,0.000011779451,0.000012624032,0.0000018199057,0.012120151,0.00005446126,6.478165e-7,0.06380769,0.00096893474,0.0006598615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118303054,0.000011148408,0.97050244,0.000030865445,0.0000023988102,5.4142532e-8,0.019844893,0.0000951151,4.7298664e-7,0.008098985,0.0012439986,0.000051326206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46681067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91624033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44942963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004678395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025044353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7122291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737155383","doi":"10.1007/s11150-017-9399-4","title":"Returns to scale in food preparation and the Deaton–Paxson puzzle","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Essex; McMaster University","keywords":"Economics; Scale (ratio); Returns to scale; Food preparation; Politics; Food processing; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Food science; Chemistry; Physics","score_opus":0.043528550114557286,"score_gpt":0.2930200108019808,"score_spread":0.24949146068742353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737155383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97714615,0.008283143,0.0000039876663,0.0035376626,0.00021577204,0.0007153031,0.000029368115,0.0000047807976,0.010063829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91837585,0.08085182,0.00013672121,0.00044252444,0.00004005567,0.000013714674,5.5477574e-7,0.000006853264,0.0001318944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992583,0.00011698178,0.00031195203,0.00013109621,0.000059277143,0.00012242024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988929,0.000067191024,0.0003683822,0.0006024938,0.00003150315,0.000037551887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014800635,0.000069332484,0.0002879414,0.000019686222,0.00026068703,0.000043097785,0.0006325437,0.000048041496,0.000002894356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028494096,0.000045781784,0.000095596646,0.000048617512,0.00027490204,0.00013623253,0.00013835709,0.00006400081,0.0000011271774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019751175,0.0002793167,0.25999463,0.004343461,0.00018983864,3.1094527e-7,0.050884012,0.0012650423,0.00009121572,0.6633818,0.0044466,0.014926237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005822299,0.00046221164,0.5648974,0.013480375,0.0005364596,0.000007124836,0.011449125,0.0023351465,0.0010911871,0.108498186,0.28989407,0.0015263607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006472257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0168325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55488366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042816482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007210119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.939293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739673893","doi":"10.3386/w23636","title":"Hours, Occupations, and Gender Differences in Labor Market Outcomes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.3907567157579422,"score_gpt":0.5301811496742411,"score_spread":0.13942443391629894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739673893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1453714,0.001393447,0.0000020959098,0.00099094,0.0008327577,0.0005568209,0.0004791171,0.00001412909,0.85035926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498937,0.014529093,0.00013652862,0.000023111867,0.0004848175,0.00006492948,0.00014614227,0.000021309517,0.034700327],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637526,0.00044360128,0.00052495056,0.00047713672,0.0017130268,0.00046599703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996405,0.0014256494,0.0003363099,0.00029910612,0.0013948896,0.00013903635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008362203,0.00018444577,0.000519268,0.00081674004,0.00051166245,0.00021648168,0.0007177033,0.0004962586,0.00034714534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037034627,0.00018053502,0.000093386654,0.00013224459,0.0008281789,0.00024222198,0.000169233,0.00057560246,0.000019359026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010965355,0.00004786326,0.8985575,0.000058729715,0.000076855074,0.0000023999528,0.001030485,0.000003570628,5.265543e-7,0.068467416,0.031180795,0.00056292646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023271696,0.000014657659,0.8661957,0.000038440387,0.000007282714,7.901938e-7,0.0012107884,0.000057935915,1.7866824e-7,0.12470264,0.0073770597,0.00016182174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018491203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015531749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.815659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011827842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009728686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99588525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741666373","doi":"10.1515/rebs-2017-0047","title":"Female Labor Force Participation Rate and Economic Growth in the Framework of Kuznets Curve: Evidence from Turkey","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic and Business Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Economics; Context (archaeology); Kuznets curve; Error correction model; Econometrics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Test (biology); Labour economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.08742578701206015,"score_gpt":0.37566445027367834,"score_spread":0.2882386632616182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741666373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8234816,0.17405233,0.0000118193675,0.0018198326,0.00019234038,0.00023453968,0.000021435611,0.000003821249,0.00018227243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5523686,0.4473747,0.00007601759,0.00009864732,0.00005563854,0.000014074957,9.2326513e-7,0.00000297372,0.000008457507],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914503,0.0001446116,0.00034810393,0.00018539076,0.00004416454,0.00013270431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986173,0.00062483293,0.00042315872,0.00021475357,0.00009799794,0.000021987731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011781767,0.00010012208,0.00045112474,0.000020644971,0.00024322805,0.000045364643,0.00022942443,0.000045149074,0.00000766972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010455992,0.00007285735,0.0000312033,0.000039802824,0.0004931392,0.00034117347,0.00008949688,0.00005072147,0.0000021051906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009475371,0.000015193746,0.96918035,0.0019479978,0.0000559893,4.770081e-7,0.010294722,0.000018574568,0.000003183756,0.01615786,0.00011610363,0.0022000622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119081924,0.000011676688,0.98530793,0.003876444,0.00006836997,1.1749399e-7,0.0035847542,0.00012199596,0.0000034192,0.00647977,0.00032824365,0.00009817316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036959716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022711097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27332237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034243043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081557446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5587228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W274311584","doi":"","title":"Do Child Tax Benefits Affect the Wellbeing of Children? Evidence from Canadian Child Benefit Expansions. NBER Working Paper No. 14624.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Economics; Child mortality; Developing country; Developmental psychology; Public economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.12842783295725865,"score_gpt":0.3872024734209468,"score_spread":0.25877464046368814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W274311584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86109143,0.0023286077,0.0000016835595,0.0030821906,0.00032231753,0.00053159695,0.00011631769,0.000012442466,0.13251343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994703,0.00356725,0.0001620995,0.00017870612,0.0008032578,0.000028926672,0.000056807174,0.000021882432,0.0004780601],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997096,0.0003012246,0.00044411945,0.00045041044,0.0010856052,0.000622616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968376,0.0017020553,0.00016524931,0.00037000832,0.00066648383,0.0002586119],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028063606,0.00016122453,0.00027761338,0.00037701082,0.0016929193,0.000078018085,0.0009762346,0.0002152281,0.00051785936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001163884,0.00014291938,0.0001503605,0.0004555256,0.00066830515,0.0003621471,0.00012298208,0.0005407035,0.00011692637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053864136,0.00009352477,0.6376279,0.000010922761,0.00021336555,0.000003288751,0.010285878,0.008255866,0.000105322986,0.3370448,0.0046353717,0.001669923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046106358,0.00005449112,0.97053874,0.00036178384,0.000015542395,0.000006016277,0.001631682,0.00048549363,0.00006843008,0.023785545,0.0023094541,0.0002817382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41825145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38635206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3329109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064036384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001406417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744543129","doi":"10.25336/p6489d","title":"Income management strategies of older couples in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Allocative efficiency; Demographic economics; Educational attainment; Economics; Psychology; Sociology; Economic growth; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03670166205852248,"score_gpt":0.3095935938467382,"score_spread":0.2728919317882157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744543129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98701835,0.0014478344,0.000004547018,0.00008250432,0.00068048586,0.0001756643,0.00001135153,0.0000039633264,0.010575311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992629,0.00045073486,0.00007640864,0.00004536682,0.000044116805,0.0000116939855,0.000009253946,0.000004481723,0.000094984716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991467,0.000052587377,0.0002015562,0.00008450672,0.0001708973,0.0003437502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970424,0.000032037544,0.00004797841,0.00008007736,0.000038761656,0.00009688632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028966946,0.000065297645,0.00013403827,0.00016673621,0.00010556463,0.000007363264,0.00008586236,0.000034387172,0.000010371357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031937336,0.000071891074,0.000010888671,0.000357619,0.00006484869,0.00016005538,0.000015516482,0.00004839893,6.8174614e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.000132e-7,0.0000040643017,0.9381871,0.000027891409,0.000010816187,0.0000035029545,0.010574981,0.00042365654,1.2900735e-7,0.050178133,0.000079493635,0.0005097245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000755992,0.0000013960007,0.8123717,0.000027103853,0.000003845535,5.400184e-8,0.18598044,0.00004955441,7.784961e-8,0.0011073746,0.00032494953,0.00005794647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17540546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022587897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005671887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5906657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744923459","doi":"10.11575/prism/30062","title":"Policy Options for Federal Disability Programs - The Disability Tax Credit (DTC) Improving Accessibility for Adults with Cystic Fibrosis (CF)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Disability insurance; Tax credit; Disability benefits; Medicine; Public economics; Political science; Economics; Social security","score_opus":0.041909220571718,"score_gpt":0.3470177407442649,"score_spread":0.30510852017254686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744923459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97791666,0.000013015543,0.0073840776,0.0061122957,0.00024457645,0.006203595,0.0010734296,0.00001601968,0.0010363082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98133034,0.000005008525,0.015698818,0.000035625497,0.0006092374,0.0011893566,0.000055081313,0.000020790596,0.001055754],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975296,0.00025204476,0.00039627677,0.0007821143,0.0003239541,0.00071596366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975355,0.0010083898,0.00020503801,0.0007271564,0.00029819127,0.00022572406],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001910863,0.00022840501,0.0002927142,0.000013117969,0.0018595527,0.0007888093,0.001127636,0.00015353576,0.00010981075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015483806,0.0001241744,0.00016849366,0.00032163112,0.001859472,0.0007959812,0.00023822689,0.00009643808,0.000007815785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011821245,0.0011534982,0.47169748,0.00013898344,0.00006649236,2.3801086e-7,0.0164352,0.000009474696,0.0002061084,0.0026246407,0.00017473742,0.50631106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006769897,0.0017884388,0.85489243,0.000287757,0.00027682597,0.0000021146682,0.080146275,0.0017643943,0.00016977436,0.029275522,0.023207474,0.0014191172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009368137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06972793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50489193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000500426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064385077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749549974","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.08.002","title":"Income and the mental health of Canadian mothers: Evidence from the Universal Child Care Benefit","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSM - Population Health","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Dalhousie University; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Mental health; Psychology; Sample (material); Developmental psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Environmental health; Population","score_opus":0.034193868756516956,"score_gpt":0.32168040475676446,"score_spread":0.2874865360002475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749549974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.945721,0.003309114,0.000012249251,0.048860908,0.0004346855,0.0005720395,0.00018810038,0.000013385056,0.0008885658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945605,0.0038900913,0.0001342721,0.0011704641,0.00014218141,0.0000020843813,0.00003748272,0.0000066985144,0.000056227567],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885374,0.00026940636,0.00019569838,0.00015342531,0.00025929813,0.00026840618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999022,0.000096009026,0.00030216432,0.00032969567,0.000051015308,0.00019912848],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085791235,0.000073977055,0.00015698925,0.00005581513,0.0037467286,0.00008517773,0.0003440765,0.000049924114,0.0000135984055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008737459,0.000051123716,0.000033077857,0.0001212586,0.00030507453,0.00020488586,0.00003356944,0.000114362716,0.0000014120163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010938516,0.0000026760215,0.76655686,0.000010992381,0.0000070264014,8.0326366e-8,0.18591131,0.000027119102,6.05684e-8,0.043923967,0.00008614113,0.0034628222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028460668,0.000024033414,0.92035866,0.000083441424,0.0000030895203,1.4599925e-7,0.076472685,0.00017885465,2.9759528e-8,0.0013890471,0.0011579682,0.00004746334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97923774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97935146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15380177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041220122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006415619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99755025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749976532","doi":"10.1007/s10797-020-09619-0","title":"Frictions and taxpayer responses: evidence from bunching at personal tax thresholds","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Tax and Public Finance","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; European Research Council; Nuffield Foundation","keywords":"Taxpayer; Economics; Public finance; Labour economics; Wage; Social security; Work (physics); Tax rate; Exploit; Schedule; Quarter (Canadian coin); Income tax; Demographic economics; Monetary economics; Public economics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.0593976641299807,"score_gpt":0.3010693644895882,"score_spread":0.2416717003596075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749976532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95293945,0.0015253712,0.0017914929,0.03710865,0.00055312697,0.00009433384,0.00029339895,0.00004195884,0.0056522097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899009,0.0026822845,0.0008874895,0.001338178,0.00050872075,0.000015184146,0.000016167969,0.000007772071,0.0046433234],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987913,0.000088918605,0.00016263136,0.00034603142,0.0003982145,0.0002129526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992172,0.00032322077,0.00009514607,0.00007609206,0.00015150823,0.00013682788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026905592,0.000108354165,0.00011227893,0.00005047883,0.0006319051,0.00025473261,0.00025521923,0.000089113506,0.00020894912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088792003,0.00010867734,0.00003930563,0.00018306683,0.00021519809,0.00063217484,0.00013789766,0.00015911866,0.000021493246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009880949,0.000044814988,0.866023,0.000009063758,0.00006223619,0.000019484869,0.0473737,0.0000192264,0.00064116623,0.06646303,0.014661349,0.0045841155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039826718,0.000054962435,0.5178939,0.00006473948,0.000012774511,0.0000064798246,0.008038864,0.007339124,0.000008145234,0.0031962825,0.4627004,0.00028605547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003252749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00278988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44803905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008619016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001577155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49172056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752323470","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.48.1.67","title":"The Impact of Family Change on Income Poverty in Colombia and Peru","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Cohabitation; Economics; Development economics; Demographic economics; Developing country; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.18746392539896337,"score_gpt":0.4400657521227221,"score_spread":0.25260182672375875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752323470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838358,0.006646543,0.0000030917292,0.0005465696,0.0005284208,0.00021457631,0.000015056496,0.000003504541,0.00820644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868043,0.01269838,0.000042021933,0.00012346475,0.00018191163,0.0000053185345,1.2473498e-7,0.0000053819113,0.00013908076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841315,0.00029952094,0.00044311446,0.00011902901,0.0004458457,0.00027934415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975983,0.000736989,0.0007936697,0.00019389002,0.0005913786,0.00008580777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012563725,0.00016472983,0.0006228656,0.000108404034,0.0011571507,0.0001135889,0.00045921138,0.000060490896,9.808773e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037963316,0.00009580529,0.0001474567,0.00012782683,0.0009950863,0.00033850706,0.00011336432,0.00027175655,0.0000016420346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034037165,0.00015983425,0.8711415,0.000012989143,0.00048487115,0.000015817763,0.117048025,0.000051345294,0.0002477087,0.0026710692,0.006972267,0.0008542084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070197956,0.00058225327,0.90127164,0.00009935024,0.000019186638,8.920086e-7,0.09451476,0.00005289471,0.000004013393,0.0018944422,0.0007638949,0.000094712144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016009536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002959607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03013013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020995244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017665685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8899985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755212620","doi":"10.24839/1089-4136.jn16.3.134","title":"Conceptualizing Fatherhood: Maternal Perceptions of Responsible Fathering","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Developmental psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.332000909263908,"score_gpt":0.49524615557293394,"score_spread":0.16324524630902593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755212620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92566717,0.0002536574,0.0011422837,0.0001742777,0.00032427578,0.000111135356,0.0000050841963,0.000013412523,0.0723087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99171513,0.0011513161,0.00604289,0.000054900305,0.00027531464,0.0000022700501,2.518585e-7,0.00001231959,0.00074557634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964079,0.001204431,0.000535037,0.00019418582,0.0010937494,0.00056468236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821216,0.0003053565,0.00021619271,0.00021217878,0.0007552329,0.00029888752],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058674896,0.00010282509,0.00026707212,0.00028976283,0.00035574578,0.000053583546,0.0008409421,0.00018033516,0.002033707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009693029,0.000077913865,0.00017292108,0.0005788622,0.0009870937,0.00018630404,0.000082601415,0.0007833436,0.000052055857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009646768,0.0014053398,0.5878161,0.00003163589,0.00013201346,0.00019443639,0.21459137,0.000024933139,0.038154792,0.14424667,0.0014123624,0.011025689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000690067,0.0010570679,0.8449063,0.00010124432,0.000013604028,0.00004131657,0.106965065,0.000020572465,0.000236193,0.044355858,0.0014533157,0.00015945164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002689472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007979969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25709015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083975116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018041999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761565494","doi":"10.3386/w23918","title":"Long-Term Care Insurance: Knowledge Barriers, Risk Perception and Adverse Selection","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"HEC Montréal; KU Leuven","keywords":"Adverse selection; Term (time); Selection (genetic algorithm); Risk perception; Actuarial science; Business; Perception; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.15554457937963745,"score_gpt":0.4893954260356387,"score_spread":0.33385084665600123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761565494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40351802,0.0020180608,0.0000050050658,0.00006495188,0.0011890183,0.00062354293,0.0003610722,0.000024576133,0.59219575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95147425,0.031854294,0.000044354794,0.0000030337799,0.0017367437,0.00005005336,0.00037613497,0.000028202661,0.014432932],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968482,0.00048481117,0.00041684168,0.000563115,0.0012589784,0.00042802969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947146,0.0003373072,0.00041335393,0.00024399927,0.004054852,0.00023587237],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00512602,0.000193136,0.00036934428,0.0005934893,0.0016453561,0.00016863045,0.00048096737,0.00070591917,0.00028531402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002262056,0.00021704767,0.00014356033,0.0001393054,0.000882973,0.00042225196,0.00012718323,0.00085395196,0.000070823975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037078684,0.000034153785,0.9620505,0.00032864895,0.00013823686,0.0000015664639,0.010017086,0.00006198721,0.000018284643,0.008635211,0.010681032,0.007996238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047224425,0.00007804845,0.9645812,0.00013627621,0.000032073454,0.0000045370575,0.0065467204,0.00013009003,0.0000020244665,0.010480192,0.017244032,0.0002925659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013162165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02457763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57776284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037980517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012838385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763802588","doi":"10.1007/s10834-017-9548-1","title":"Uncertainty, Doubts, and Delays: Economic Circumstances and Childbearing Expectations Among Emerging Adults","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Fertility; Context (archaeology); Demographic economics; Psychology; Unintended pregnancy; Sample (material); Economics; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Demography; Population; Family planning; Sociology; Research methodology","score_opus":0.022779675474386835,"score_gpt":0.29697128295725106,"score_spread":0.2741916074828642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763802588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98806363,0.005597267,0.000020077983,0.00062025763,0.00061224634,0.00008273158,0.000010220829,0.000009513831,0.004984051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819442,0.01701221,0.0002776708,0.00004207988,0.0005678052,0.0000016892769,8.6099845e-7,0.000009626542,0.0001438305],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990927,0.000042007956,0.00036514047,0.00019651238,0.00006933148,0.00023431897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991079,0.00007759231,0.00047891127,0.00013092956,0.000038291902,0.00016638437],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050043996,0.00012872703,0.00029424144,0.00010289562,0.0013106759,0.00052733737,0.00021710571,0.000085776235,0.000011279889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043953525,0.00012771286,0.00004999282,0.000011981884,0.00046877595,0.0010397193,0.00006275076,0.00014086183,0.0000030059002],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005627161,0.000014295717,0.8959919,0.00003054035,0.00014260568,0.000011318944,0.08346932,0.00057771587,0.000039738043,0.009697379,0.0003549016,0.00961397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010663817,0.000083929444,0.7796198,0.0001419746,0.00005320253,0.000015399413,0.20759095,0.0029015953,0.000007064408,0.004609772,0.0036257016,0.0002842091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004720885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007709647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124121636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008774746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096770935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764324617","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.45.3.405","title":"Who Remains Unpartnered by Mid-Life in Norway? Differentials by Gender and Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Norwegian; Odds; Marital status; Demography; Cohabitation; Psychology; Gerontology; Odds ratio; Medicine; Geography; Sociology; Population; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.07980400359014125,"score_gpt":0.3774712735016454,"score_spread":0.29766726991150416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764324617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96901613,0.017499961,0.0007416208,0.0005593744,0.00071640196,0.0001643872,0.000012526921,0.0000071591157,0.011282429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906303,0.0070536113,0.00019533813,0.0006191101,0.0002733788,0.000006780294,0.0000028974946,0.000008298255,0.0012102496],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978357,0.00064391445,0.0005911207,0.00018371343,0.00045757386,0.0002879955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832255,0.00039799497,0.00046503698,0.00009669613,0.0005405818,0.00017716941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090046466,0.00018939924,0.00069062464,0.00013975687,0.0003527215,0.00007680549,0.00020020865,0.0000773505,0.0000066204625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026025876,0.000155315,0.00007276234,0.00025447705,0.00040176176,0.00026320133,0.000046716883,0.00021516035,0.000004253842],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010645633,0.00065662694,0.30192274,0.0000660537,0.00066226936,0.0000015449451,0.17085433,0.000060439186,0.0071354476,0.014231376,0.5035879,0.0007148188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013355374,0.00021428536,0.6478851,0.00012525253,0.00010715901,0.0000014276249,0.29805928,0.00009669703,0.000093529525,0.008530352,0.04319129,0.00036010006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000088295834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004945887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46039662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013742152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002417161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6333562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767946149","doi":"10.1002/jid.3333","title":"Income Effects on Intra‐Household Time Allocation: Regression Discontinuity Evidence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Government of Alberta","funders":"International Development Research Centre; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement","keywords":"Economics; Regression discontinuity design; Work (physics); Time allocation; Demographic economics; Leisure time; Labour economics","score_opus":0.03446226306930273,"score_gpt":0.32433601658584776,"score_spread":0.28987375351654504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767946149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.984059,0.00010285641,0.0007938441,0.0046414924,0.002964266,0.00011527368,0.0000014750361,0.000014664549,0.0073071555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927166,0.00035419708,0.00263739,0.00020981148,0.0007098165,0.000003593935,0.0000015735491,0.0000083229515,0.0033586791],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981619,0.000096552554,0.00040871804,0.00013713584,0.0010264658,0.00016921149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983132,0.00021947695,0.00071986683,0.00017663899,0.0004370134,0.00013380282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013499432,0.00011373512,0.00017254346,0.00012572874,0.00060212356,0.00028779995,0.0009771272,0.00007570828,0.000059632486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013318124,0.00008789522,0.000073629046,0.000046578854,0.00009453439,0.00064389204,0.00010739646,0.00020680188,0.000050318682],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034209903,0.00043677975,0.8589715,0.000061515144,0.00043780814,0.00024017433,0.026314028,0.00024704853,0.0034463778,0.013227952,0.0076128375,0.08866188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036107644,0.000055815188,0.98489946,0.0010436663,0.000010005242,0.000007692835,0.00028806514,0.00005213247,0.00087716006,0.00078642124,0.011482087,0.00013642405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045317083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000097051874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12592795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005042881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005057786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46311083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769578543","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2017-039","title":"Economic Well-Being of Canadian Children","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Demographic economics; Economics; Geography; Development economics; Economic growth; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.01700737439947895,"score_gpt":0.26319723964328384,"score_spread":0.2461898652438049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769578543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.432924,0.000026309366,7.9046765e-7,0.019581167,0.00033079163,0.00011883072,0.00013694851,0.00001396934,0.5468672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99351156,0.00018031277,0.000035931942,0.0015745031,0.0009129369,0.000004968898,0.000026511047,0.000019330771,0.0037339465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983509,0.000053595497,0.00018424401,0.00022612624,0.00011884768,0.0010662744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685764,0.000017109684,0.00012597707,0.00062294945,0.000077139695,0.0022991656],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041323437,0.0001234968,0.00017596074,0.0014936574,0.0020610476,0.00043427153,0.0011739737,0.00018435477,0.00027494502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038972247,0.00015185437,0.000074997464,0.0002676953,0.0004657843,0.00040956857,0.000032813517,0.00012662771,0.00017774457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.68051e-7,0.000002073569,0.37807846,0.0000015396588,0.000020734318,0.0000028450277,0.002247177,0.0000016259472,6.993581e-7,0.60797733,0.00920197,0.0024653883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001228339,0.0000054422826,0.6516586,0.000004157329,0.000005312334,0.0000015636862,0.000660844,0.000020545214,0.0000014354488,0.0041148183,0.34323913,0.00016535119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99970806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99992204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6038625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016252195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029000502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771443830","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v10i1.42252","title":"Taxing Feedlots in Alberta: Lethbridge County's Tax on Confined Feeding Operations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Alberta Beef Producers","keywords":"Geography; Agricultural economics; Business; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.059803591309291894,"score_gpt":0.34633914165204754,"score_spread":0.28653555034275563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771443830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3577248,0.000029213776,0.0004657389,0.28678074,0.00032960525,0.000612408,0.00014174095,0.000078071,0.3538377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97853035,0.00012447094,0.00018989985,0.0011344262,0.00067654514,0.00014256967,0.000035723006,0.000021806723,0.01914422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997689,0.0002992228,0.00047515362,0.000319589,0.00054689316,0.0006701399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713194,0.0003581244,0.0003297988,0.0012419118,0.0005910987,0.00034714554],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023367014,0.00018026303,0.00024684332,0.00056770083,0.003122844,0.0014386444,0.002031552,0.00016137269,0.00016519346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013863248,0.00015526936,0.000101719,0.0009623855,0.0007873361,0.0014034575,0.00017225376,0.00039555365,0.0001068026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019967547,0.00011091675,0.04629394,0.0000037861873,0.000027111582,1.2521302e-7,0.00301699,0.00009505379,0.00018088802,0.94293797,0.006920959,0.0004102639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005348635,0.000023201814,0.9093288,0.000023385066,0.000015688753,0.0000012375201,0.0043,0.0006598191,0.000011720545,0.0055447896,0.079322025,0.00023442967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1478998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09922712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9373932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038886533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026522055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771885654","doi":"10.1080/13545701.2017.1404621","title":"Gender, Low-Paid Status, and Time Poverty in Urban China","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Bureau of Statistics of China","keywords":"Poverty; Overtime; China; Demographic economics; Time-use survey; Wage; Economics; Survey data collection; Labour economics; Economic growth; Work (physics); Geography","score_opus":0.016835002115535423,"score_gpt":0.2558052771799857,"score_spread":0.23897027506445026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771885654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77175176,0.000078876925,0.0000050663443,0.00022761124,0.00040098402,0.00013565685,0.000082096776,0.000026289237,0.22729164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944753,0.0011426497,0.0002826332,0.00041738217,0.00023400338,0.0000057417096,0.0000142719155,0.000019316974,0.003408669],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988506,0.000044846296,0.00023352786,0.000327052,0.00006805824,0.0004759574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912304,0.0000561258,0.00017368793,0.00042480286,0.00001613119,0.00020619069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004696377,0.00014409554,0.00023102808,0.000052490475,0.00078178453,0.00038270236,0.0004006451,0.00016045039,0.00008823084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013343572,0.00016361801,0.000046744677,0.000031578922,0.00033705388,0.00027869805,0.00012753412,0.00014528584,0.0000853373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019081004,0.00006216482,0.92951035,0.000014427314,0.00001803288,0.000005117635,0.023564119,0.000015888209,0.000008518473,0.04371054,0.002157016,0.000914712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067823933,0.000027323376,0.92415875,0.000010036289,0.000009728507,0.0000010476443,0.0042445157,0.0014222071,0.0000042697393,0.012012508,0.057096876,0.00033451468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002246102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028489486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22388297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018953194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002955039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6672149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772283625","doi":"10.1332/030557317x15053060139376","title":"Matching policy tools and their targets: beyond nudges and utility maximisation in policy design","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Nudge theory; Incentive; Matching (statistics); Public economics; Focus (optics); Policy mix; Management science; Economics; Policy analysis; Compliance (psychology); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Microeconomics; Political science; Business; Public administration; Macroeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0663821511405952,"score_gpt":0.34703333370318673,"score_spread":0.28065118256259153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772283625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92388874,0.00033960582,0.002171262,0.0209528,0.00016213735,0.0005369237,0.00032112192,0.00009650822,0.051530883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99279356,0.0012721622,0.0010429379,0.002628133,0.0014548632,0.000015071934,0.000011590422,0.000030119236,0.0007515821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997677,0.00031463875,0.00035250702,0.000385025,0.00025504388,0.001015755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843144,0.00034710264,0.00019902337,0.00051463617,0.000103452636,0.00040434836],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009542357,0.0002791731,0.0003408219,0.00040453539,0.0015719114,0.000698084,0.00044275966,0.00024983723,0.0000063490083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00193491,0.0002728322,0.00005750226,0.00020558319,0.00097531866,0.00065422646,0.00021418696,0.00023267837,0.0000055118862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008124474,0.00005491961,0.05020295,0.00004236928,0.000020199766,0.0000028385275,0.08627155,0.000012161229,0.00014789857,0.85446477,0.00008554674,0.008686684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044288815,0.000030194788,0.44770283,0.000021231466,0.000010262132,0.0000046071186,0.013620492,0.00033566405,0.000094461495,0.5332346,0.0041975565,0.00030524455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16964489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058487603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39749986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004312625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001499696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772367224","doi":"10.1111/caje.12299","title":"Canadian contributions to family economics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Labour supply; Work (physics); Family life; Economics; Child labour; Labour economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Sociology; Geography; Socioeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0994579928697707,"score_gpt":0.23267632271155994,"score_spread":0.13321832984178925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772367224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9483999,0.00013269129,0.000066244094,0.01987527,0.005052063,0.0004098763,0.0016556004,0.000009121894,0.024399238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922614,0.00042783923,0.00042554698,0.0028778173,0.001802708,0.000015720036,0.000020614438,0.000058676917,0.0021096852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967709,0.000104113424,0.0008905791,0.00044355786,0.0000056147483,0.00178521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885133,0.00012021469,0.0007568402,0.0008900714,0.00070884806,0.009010724],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016493229,0.00033775144,0.0007087125,0.0010479138,0.002957747,0.0010574088,0.002083986,0.0004107334,0.00020922378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012436584,0.00045883362,0.00030593085,0.00010902138,0.00046448043,0.0009095062,0.000038613307,0.000470817,0.00011784757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017735107,0.000008231524,0.048555613,0.0000069373164,0.00014778275,0.00014592624,0.0065783337,0.0030650145,0.000005061379,0.9354596,0.0037362105,0.002273514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010147984,0.0002427891,0.055289883,0.00008534563,0.00009217262,0.00010519482,0.0103151025,0.000556854,0.0000113679835,0.19850357,0.7326889,0.0010940435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98740345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73695606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012498026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029350193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773972623","doi":"10.1080/02255189.2017.1377061","title":"Efficiency and gender equality in growth theory: simply add-ons?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender equality; Work (physics); Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Gender studies; Economic system","score_opus":0.09706161277329198,"score_gpt":0.30484170538033944,"score_spread":0.20778009260704747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773972623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847529,0.0011184467,0.0002705733,0.0070968294,0.0015958868,0.00037545318,0.000021084446,0.000010105624,0.0047587035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960509,0.0013854853,0.0013956837,0.00068943156,0.00021777095,0.000019205198,0.0000036974304,0.000026033049,0.00021178176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676794,0.0002787132,0.00093017594,0.00041714383,0.00026931785,0.0013367285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964194,0.00019652168,0.0006563655,0.00033221304,0.0008945539,0.0015009233],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005223359,0.00034683786,0.00062827533,0.0005418626,0.002894742,0.0002618991,0.0010241698,0.00014022688,0.000066585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002165974,0.00034714182,0.00008789593,0.00029868857,0.0007500607,0.00035696576,0.00014065826,0.00034012483,0.000005209764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017630953,0.000047264835,0.62208515,0.00010282868,0.00034990077,0.00039232644,0.23773018,0.000020445776,0.000005184337,0.1352178,0.0009067422,0.0031245274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011698876,0.00008569191,0.8515371,0.00021310075,0.00007199106,0.00003282836,0.111275464,0.000010238803,0.000008796825,0.011322284,0.023645528,0.00062709994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028380552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.938573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9101925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036409379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063549057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775560803","doi":"","title":"Women and homework: the Canadian legislative framework","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.022994625415195584,"score_gpt":0.26307184777143167,"score_spread":0.24007722235623608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775560803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21821068,0.00022227925,0.000006512267,0.004215978,0.00056834234,0.00030108972,0.00011577652,0.000014016112,0.7763453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97404945,0.0009550206,0.00032807316,0.0010729276,0.0004377489,0.000031046067,0.0000040278164,0.000021784195,0.023099901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816865,0.00010950171,0.00020425653,0.00026834974,0.00031327587,0.0009359818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759305,0.00016607677,0.00015792,0.0006391453,0.00012872764,0.0013150761],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071441336,0.00016876907,0.00023652185,0.0002800683,0.0035478054,0.00031600028,0.0008307051,0.00029643197,0.000123042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065938086,0.00014956077,0.000042944896,0.0001806643,0.0010925067,0.00022812576,0.000044688582,0.0003437076,0.00001454559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003837996,0.000005717572,0.2831978,0.000010513491,0.0000524598,0.00003058773,0.11604405,0.000002939059,4.1390268e-7,0.58499056,0.0056721363,0.00998897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075570955,0.000016823364,0.3432846,0.000015339465,0.0000102182275,6.2399516e-7,0.0064986767,0.0000053912822,9.4268614e-8,0.025775498,0.624153,0.00016411766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99529546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7558388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053840474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003962822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99774945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779912173","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190628963.013.26","title":"Women and the Labor Market","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Empiricism; Economics; Work (physics); Neoclassical economics; Politics; Positive economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Feminist theory; Feminism; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gender studies; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025696127492634075,"score_gpt":0.28356410386003483,"score_spread":0.2578679763674008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779912173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00349382,0.0036881657,0.000013375372,0.0016738548,0.0017716627,0.00031966952,0.00013516446,0.000054629716,0.98884964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00455373,0.23775145,0.000053726417,0.0005107418,0.00078182796,0.000036167206,0.000013222826,0.0000140350785,0.7562851],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983101,0.00030348313,0.00016399688,0.00029405273,0.0004406929,0.00048768838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988018,0.00029238814,0.00016666006,0.00046019763,0.00011855977,0.00016039367],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001308734,0.0001964231,0.00037058225,0.000044968565,0.0011902293,0.00045809874,0.0007562545,0.0004206342,0.0011210304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034209483,0.00011724132,0.00006523477,0.0000785056,0.0010411092,0.00009335823,0.00015927905,0.00035757138,0.000035821966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035136756,0.000020688627,0.0048163775,0.00008077319,0.00011134351,0.0000047574986,0.031203158,4.1014317e-8,1.0026221e-8,0.083987445,0.84578466,0.033955585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043194374,0.000008226034,0.008789219,0.000030750823,0.000023089926,4.1326462e-7,0.016427092,0.000012487512,6.3536554e-9,0.014138383,0.95995235,0.00018602454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032254586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004059736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2340633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011753044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006982889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783291876","doi":"","title":"Review of For the Family: How Class and Gender Shape Women’s Work","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Gender, Science, and Technology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Gender studies; Work (physics); Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.03866714263906662,"score_gpt":0.3238507106823986,"score_spread":0.285183568043332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783291876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90633774,0.051241387,0.0049436805,0.026933301,0.0038731087,0.00047502873,0.000024727828,0.000039060487,0.006131981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569942,0.0399591,0.0010490533,0.0015551728,0.00032141258,0.000009130308,2.7202864e-7,0.000005560472,0.000106151376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984247,0.000036094596,0.00030722583,0.0001910541,0.0007371037,0.00030383922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966299,0.00015935315,0.00036642735,0.00013127946,0.0026154674,0.00009755354],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002690338,0.00009684783,0.00021020159,0.00042222362,0.0004205397,0.000093448994,0.0010245399,0.0000899225,0.000019581876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009711195,0.00006694202,0.000048129517,0.0008198616,0.0034412562,0.000253059,0.00014179363,0.00016105142,7.390625e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015718631,0.0002562416,0.088347875,0.00036794037,0.0006389693,0.000019024332,0.03312647,0.0000025952868,0.004624887,0.604666,0.024259051,0.24353378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018755008,0.0006851427,0.054452013,0.0007361852,0.00015177346,0.00022285861,0.11499897,0.0010661064,0.00019795715,0.13847211,0.68664026,0.00050110166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012623512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020832236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66238123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013579751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006252861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785322041","doi":"10.1086/733488","title":"Men, Women, and Capital: Estimating Substitution Patterns Using a Size and Gender-Dependent Childcare Policy in Chile","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Productivity; Capital (architecture); Labour economics; Legislation; Capital intensity; Economics; Business; Demographic economics; Human capital; Market economy; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.022416061457809763,"score_gpt":0.29361722967105625,"score_spread":0.27120116821324647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785322041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967897,0.0014348457,0.00028067423,0.00040520102,0.0005328761,0.00009724417,0.000054535463,0.000013530697,0.00039140976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940547,0.0034964143,0.0016282513,0.00013520614,0.00064574205,0.0000014897998,9.406893e-7,0.00001570351,0.000021575459],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989727,0.000065626584,0.00040499243,0.00016625632,0.00010452326,0.00028588893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994269,0.00010977056,0.0001754738,0.00006676518,0.00005611678,0.00016496367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007659626,0.00011890845,0.00023146777,0.00021327555,0.00017220572,0.00028792612,0.00010580805,0.0000955849,0.000012806096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014207908,0.000119815035,0.00003675501,0.00015063467,0.00009016455,0.0005865174,0.000041443353,0.00022170207,7.808282e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032186552,0.00008086947,0.62652886,0.0002542047,0.00016699976,0.00009110175,0.29144853,0.009366992,0.00037899837,0.06748584,0.0000105521385,0.0041548624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019128239,0.00016044294,0.7577166,0.00033443343,0.000092492395,0.0003576685,0.13468774,0.043480147,0.00001830368,0.059194885,0.0012893234,0.00075517286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008901201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011012582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1567608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067123474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053372956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48859152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786941502","doi":"10.1186/s12651-019-0263-2","title":"Economic cycle and deceleration of female labor force participation in Latin America","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Labour Market Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad Nacional de La Plata; International Development Research Centre; American Association of Equine Practitioners Foundation; Inter-American Development Bank","keywords":"Latin Americans; Business cycle; Economics; Demographic economics; Population; Economic model; Labour economics; Political science; Demography; Macroeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.048510899726157415,"score_gpt":0.402318176951207,"score_spread":0.35380727722504957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786941502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99383754,0.0001310888,0.00012585227,0.00080851506,0.00021996447,0.00040535213,0.000021078324,0.000007969392,0.004442634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99290776,0.0010025925,0.0006492722,0.000041840503,0.00013703186,0.000019284911,0.000002471151,0.000013649073,0.005226095],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983343,0.00047057006,0.00029281073,0.00014879945,0.0003420322,0.0004115144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874693,0.0005917852,0.00011694275,0.000101628146,0.00032087573,0.00012184881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036800175,0.00006208391,0.0001622859,0.00021663377,0.0002582356,0.00013063464,0.00015113082,0.00008175612,0.0002139831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049306685,0.000060408,0.000036918507,0.00029721955,0.00012188396,0.00029228503,0.000033541146,0.00023618685,0.0000071848413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026905438,0.00009734673,0.9568258,0.00008103226,0.000021721073,0.0000017917694,0.012860873,0.0010485162,0.001072462,0.019551365,0.0011381016,0.0070319357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092963956,0.00023601575,0.93432534,0.000039133425,0.0000047730828,9.002007e-7,0.0195306,0.015836054,0.000069296024,0.01149295,0.017419092,0.00011621438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085732277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030858775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022500468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020020586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039315724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24633667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788654293","doi":"10.1177/1464700118754956","title":"Beyond the established categories: An alternative approach to feminist thought starting from debates about women and the rise of the market economy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Theory","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Sociology; Marxist philosophy; Gender studies; Kinship; Psychoanalytic theory; Feminist philosophy; Politics; Skepticism; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.011247662961697984,"score_gpt":0.25161929798762567,"score_spread":0.24037163502592768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788654293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5926156,0.0002385765,0.0003911491,0.0005002066,0.00047528854,0.0005621088,0.00012367251,0.000029887029,0.4050635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99329686,0.0000372693,0.00034749598,0.0022588656,0.00072139374,0.00011530257,0.000005247804,0.00002536999,0.0031922143],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970161,0.0014222796,0.00037451385,0.0004069602,0.00028994464,0.00049020187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971005,0.0015873489,0.00030635778,0.00069188786,0.00015324757,0.0001606914],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005058426,0.00021815462,0.0003049578,0.00003553439,0.001699199,0.0004484662,0.001286817,0.00010460642,0.000116378906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060081924,0.00011454518,0.0000756699,0.00036143098,0.0041629737,0.00021334972,0.00029847116,0.0002243219,0.0000058739597],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027803695,0.000062550156,0.009207003,0.000008474468,0.00008313595,3.8173272e-7,0.56727314,0.0000066067614,0.000014465329,0.420982,0.0012502116,0.0008339596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005195392,0.00005579378,0.0048428136,0.000011110611,0.000040724775,5.2158356e-7,0.5271962,0.0005730884,0.000079929305,0.4433686,0.023113715,0.000197892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014208204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006858734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4018713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096490236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000253866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789550783","doi":"10.1177/0192513x18755197","title":"Matrimonial Expenditures and Egyptian Women’s Power Within Marriage","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Institute of International Education","keywords":"Power (physics); Association (psychology); Demographic economics; Demography; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020198000502977632,"score_gpt":0.31671283431642583,"score_spread":0.2965148338134482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789550783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98275554,0.0018611923,0.000083299514,0.00068547664,0.0023698227,0.00008573068,0.000006992842,0.000025782207,0.012126141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99278235,0.0008742257,0.0019740358,0.000626283,0.001998382,0.0000016373642,4.2128698e-7,0.000017022117,0.001725633],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982345,0.00018528898,0.00042972437,0.00015609126,0.0006016458,0.00039272866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989053,0.00006471368,0.00034605496,0.00014015469,0.00024895486,0.00029482748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012696558,0.00015275409,0.0003086444,0.00016530923,0.0004022203,0.00020740576,0.00033787964,0.00015434131,0.00019290559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014478678,0.0001259476,0.000074934374,0.00013114349,0.00048244855,0.00038280815,0.000047934573,0.0002303095,0.000027133214],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041710425,0.00027845468,0.08995248,0.000035253506,0.00029440524,0.0002753276,0.818679,0.000012615144,0.0089474255,0.023882445,0.054870028,0.0023554955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001334716,0.0012118721,0.2236644,0.00009205577,0.00005384234,0.00004086709,0.48889092,0.000024264886,0.00022516202,0.014981825,0.26898748,0.0004925968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048476428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003072334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32978803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013535896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021522386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5135994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790861068","doi":"10.7202/1043296ar","title":"Et si les conjoints ne partageaient pas tous leurs revenus ? Conséquences sur la mesure des inégalités du bien-être","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03228442270889831,"score_gpt":0.2768272785585247,"score_spread":0.24454285584962637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790861068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9393067,0.030561768,0.00038555494,0.00556385,0.003164191,0.000537268,0.00039047637,0.0002377577,0.019852465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624764,0.025717346,0.0008959926,0.0063758413,0.0009151496,0.000056128774,0.000040704443,0.00009083374,0.003431629],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931997,0.0023987032,0.00082845363,0.0010263701,0.00085518014,0.0016915955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99599695,0.0011500777,0.00047693928,0.0006847375,0.0008163324,0.000874937],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030163391,0.0007301072,0.0007983116,0.0004734047,0.001970215,0.0003562246,0.0009608588,0.0012004124,0.00021520676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012438681,0.00076106744,0.0005795493,0.0028362304,0.019745884,0.00062337355,0.00011228244,0.0009984815,0.000073819014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007854031,0.00051040726,0.65567183,0.0002393463,0.00051914423,0.00046277253,0.15437992,0.00004481308,0.00022420559,0.13792706,0.027773485,0.02216847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013693254,0.000749064,0.25289997,0.00054008997,0.0005275767,0.00015004055,0.09600263,0.00014442978,0.0000882012,0.023752641,0.6222284,0.0015476234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.086613506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27219403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59445494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039641932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001570184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791728604","doi":"10.18535/jmscr/v6i2.32","title":"Choice of place of Delivery amongst Women in a Rural Community in northeastern Nigeria","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Socioeconomics; Rural community; Economic growth; Sociology","score_opus":0.1597193960463785,"score_gpt":0.5035075498506696,"score_spread":0.34378815380429106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791728604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967106,0.00007250391,0.000006661111,0.0014775236,0.0002044876,0.00008760899,0.0000014295902,0.0000012750692,0.0014379387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99811345,0.0015019324,0.000036435402,0.000106517145,0.00019316247,9.751656e-7,7.63689e-8,0.0000024545482,0.000045017303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919374,0.0020128808,0.0009864983,0.00012185556,0.0042982786,0.0006430927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930556,0.0042978185,0.000252353,0.00017510037,0.0014191597,0.000799979],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.095570385,0.000057825368,0.0003737229,0.00033651048,0.00027338054,0.000039385548,0.0014754265,0.00019263956,0.000080350364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03639178,0.000042990137,0.00005133341,0.0017864458,0.0097420495,0.00029394816,0.00035183397,0.0015182663,0.0000021469898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001337881,0.00044046878,0.96664244,0.000014443775,0.0000050901826,0.000009450845,0.016367964,6.2822375e-7,0.00008594765,0.00016966123,0.00004555686,0.016084539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000920975,0.00097084296,0.8860145,0.00023199506,0.0000015025082,0.0000015316449,0.1098064,0.0005511115,0.0000056924073,0.0011193966,0.0003289442,0.000047091773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012186083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051501986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09343844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020579723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038569816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99439186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794804025","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v11i1.43393","title":"Social Policy Trends: International Trends in Female Employment Rates","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Social policy; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.07543429815583116,"score_gpt":0.4013692233084711,"score_spread":0.3259349251526399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794804025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17868453,0.000035881338,0.00017075476,0.35848704,0.00027020703,0.00015032076,0.00014176108,0.0001439546,0.46191555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542264,0.00006388907,0.00016295488,0.0014205461,0.004052898,0.00009533174,0.00010542874,0.00002024666,0.039852355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747324,0.00038829033,0.0005038689,0.0003036461,0.00064060575,0.00069033157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982445,0.00008676033,0.0002803623,0.00047764526,0.00062992936,0.0002807594],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001527219,0.00017135356,0.00020929496,0.0023761257,0.00083610433,0.0003843784,0.0015709338,0.00015362015,0.001262372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014922238,0.00014773011,0.0001480114,0.005953971,0.001054693,0.0007902045,0.00019238636,0.00023555483,0.00011139914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043202795,0.0002360805,0.07601665,0.000001341654,0.000060978862,9.0959404e-8,0.013699437,0.0000019670917,0.00004649894,0.85767555,0.034237303,0.018019753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036250707,0.000024060922,0.7427589,0.0000028384684,0.000008816141,7.3479436e-7,0.0050366404,0.000057872578,0.0000058017004,0.010452546,0.24114597,0.00014326976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02464669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015926983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84722304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067314424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019956063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797835555","doi":"10.2307/486429","title":"Women in Sub-Saharan Africa","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Socioeconomics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03433752204251186,"score_gpt":0.2444619804963015,"score_spread":0.21012445845378963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797835555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9488457,0.014995004,0.0000035682863,0.0015964032,0.00074316136,0.00025457132,0.0000749181,0.000022387825,0.033464316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98671854,0.008392782,0.0002576856,0.00017770822,0.0005534235,0.00003118272,0.0000018440778,0.0000456763,0.0038211348],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569285,0.00034112265,0.0009094158,0.00038543972,0.00025218024,0.0024189919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956489,0.00033337387,0.00031588186,0.00032330875,0.000835216,0.0025433155],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00223715,0.00037443213,0.0009326451,0.0009476702,0.0009770986,0.00013693601,0.0009298121,0.0001646156,0.00026386778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015171346,0.00037435713,0.00021536047,0.0022574605,0.0013800389,0.00040774417,0.0000253574,0.0004219392,0.000019900388],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000874404,0.00011155345,0.038772255,0.00014920191,0.0006244991,0.0026642405,0.9170961,0.0006429308,0.0000715909,0.008495515,0.008588554,0.022696152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064406625,0.00034043269,0.04045703,0.00025137467,0.00006996658,0.00008321201,0.27010933,0.000019901388,0.0000013360963,0.0067711463,0.6806447,0.00060752087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05669463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9177869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86109227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004998492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002344287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797855495","doi":"10.18584/iipj.2018.9.4.2","title":"Estimating Institutionalization and Homelessness for Status First Nations in Canada: A Method and Implications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Indigenous Policy Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Census; Indigenous; Population; Political science; Demography; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.028255794533251024,"score_gpt":0.36433998460056144,"score_spread":0.33608419006731044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797855495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7673532,0.00019694942,0.22141561,0.0042919535,0.0007966851,0.00040521414,0.00030010613,0.000018070867,0.005222237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830272,0.00048334413,0.0150924735,0.00028194676,0.0009827742,0.000029532921,0.000026402935,0.000008953849,0.0000673358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989409,0.00005761481,0.00028126253,0.00014777514,0.0002556543,0.00031678026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986995,0.00037367904,0.00016268049,0.00005201367,0.00055491755,0.00015723864],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004591285,0.000085399835,0.000107318534,0.00039519678,0.0018657912,0.0001795618,0.00016941152,0.000053166346,0.000012394714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096410344,0.00009155083,0.000019019484,0.00033862682,0.00014323546,0.00027858047,0.000031198462,0.000105450374,5.443462e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013589358,0.0000572756,0.43210596,0.000017149865,0.00006478958,0.0000027181165,0.073742755,0.0022413225,0.000022017144,0.4797309,0.00010907727,0.011892451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009649993,0.000047531023,0.87795264,0.00006870613,0.000020205185,0.00010894992,0.011150333,0.012123194,0.0000062879585,0.0711969,0.026081875,0.00027839633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7125241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98407304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44584668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015003093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056198477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799490533","doi":"10.1111/caje.12335","title":"Welfare analysis when people are different","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Welfare economics; Gens; Economics; Economic rent; Poverty; Econometrics; Inequality; Estimation; Welfare; Consumption (sociology); Mathematics; Humanities; Sociology; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Art","score_opus":0.08067415417525386,"score_gpt":0.20314211962995157,"score_spread":0.12246796545469771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799490533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853953,0.00013108697,0.00017773363,0.006761593,0.0022574824,0.00017501762,0.00024163605,0.000010946653,0.004849185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99605083,0.0001324552,0.0002412231,0.0006904164,0.0016195537,0.000006388389,0.000017337374,0.000037203114,0.0012046101],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976549,0.00015379257,0.0007575653,0.00037308785,0.000007427965,0.0010532008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99536294,0.00009330082,0.0007437403,0.00043580533,0.0005286664,0.0028355697],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007891591,0.00027963973,0.0008000879,0.0011488274,0.0009002453,0.0002779366,0.00089631585,0.00026979946,0.0014581288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025369797,0.00032377595,0.0004461062,0.00041327477,0.00042795105,0.00039271265,0.000023442783,0.00031207895,0.000029060682],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022921002,0.000017764245,0.57423466,0.000013902066,0.00081002095,0.00006281851,0.03129835,0.00084887864,0.0000014983193,0.39064714,0.001173964,0.0008680818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011725347,0.000522324,0.5599093,0.000080475904,0.0010956218,0.000080626,0.07011493,0.002885074,0.000013697957,0.1776625,0.18500903,0.0014538909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5682668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4315284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002887436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022822458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799852352","doi":"10.1111/jlca.12309","title":"(En)Gendering Equality? Conditional Cash Transfers as National Development in Post‐Neoliberal Ecuador","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.023637631154971906,"score_gpt":0.32952314029554153,"score_spread":0.3058855091405696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799852352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98553246,0.00018824349,0.00075413135,0.006681734,0.00064797304,0.00013068834,0.00007114914,0.00000964447,0.0059839673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99490833,0.001555678,0.0006456608,0.0021129649,0.0005917588,0.0000013991197,0.000012652695,0.000018724411,0.00015281401],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967861,0.001047957,0.0007616356,0.0002051679,0.0006956071,0.0005035153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822176,0.0005011257,0.0004783214,0.000097725344,0.000506565,0.00019447866],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018785391,0.00023922966,0.0004908477,0.00024091372,0.0007010006,0.00005997287,0.00036224845,0.00013387363,0.00034571424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015168157,0.0001911182,0.00010055199,0.00045642542,0.006817533,0.00015554213,0.00006726067,0.0004937181,0.000021135334],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012939979,0.001051998,0.118500486,0.000094521216,0.0013542012,0.00019716301,0.6858169,0.00032492803,0.0027599605,0.14454229,0.0010084846,0.043055084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018838149,0.0024953233,0.54047596,0.00007641263,0.00013892289,0.00034569582,0.4409735,0.000273877,0.0002243151,0.0062552434,0.006287243,0.00056969124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00523259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004190024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4219755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029877736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012610146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801233642","doi":"10.25336/csp29354","title":"Marriage Vows and Racial Choices","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.04883067370709814,"score_gpt":0.346727443968884,"score_spread":0.29789677026178585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801233642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747372,0.00080469594,0.000005984393,0.00032491726,0.001190258,0.0001400185,0.000010078766,0.0000159587,0.022770867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99810386,0.00026763632,0.00010729812,0.00029550627,0.00062205177,0.0000063436637,0.000006867247,0.0000049072737,0.00058551854],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993292,0.000063077576,0.00011509084,0.00014080157,0.000102102415,0.00024974605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996729,0.000033497243,0.000032526248,0.0000667168,0.00007385677,0.00012049768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029393242,0.000061119405,0.00009818177,0.0001235818,0.0005666983,0.000028938857,0.000063865205,0.00006737577,0.00002030524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026597438,0.00006558803,0.000011167984,0.0002274274,0.0002879119,0.00012782212,0.000015105705,0.000047150297,0.000008238004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018177127,0.000002334388,0.9354001,0.0000057803486,0.000009856788,0.0000031893585,0.041683033,0.0000021499689,0.0000013763664,0.017901413,0.00072248746,0.004266439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011351923,0.000012323082,0.9460042,0.000011621923,0.0000061178516,1.8663037e-7,0.01824213,0.00007820543,1.9227566e-7,0.0051018237,0.030334264,0.00009540791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3960561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9896028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59354675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003086656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009325012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60796565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803460999","doi":"10.1177/1367493518777152","title":"What would help low-income families? Results from a North American survey of 2-1-1 helpline professionals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Health Care","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Helpline; Family medicine; Medicine; Low income; Psychology; Emergency medicine; Socioeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.024976661632000973,"score_gpt":0.3532048392151185,"score_spread":0.32822817758311756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803460999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836853,0.002337982,0.000056041965,0.009688169,0.0027770058,0.00027748707,0.0007199801,0.00001613094,0.0004419122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868487,0.0059353616,0.00049325393,0.0050022765,0.0015009299,0.0000013390134,0.00010241195,0.000020810152,0.000094898496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99603987,0.0008503443,0.0012634266,0.0002482157,0.0010846448,0.0005134956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99462354,0.000418302,0.0019763517,0.00030473046,0.002206033,0.00047103103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019852235,0.0001843571,0.0007130651,0.0002047551,0.0006054456,0.000061184466,0.00052382104,0.00016121677,0.000018958908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007891475,0.00015170724,0.00014512293,0.00092788466,0.00048173012,0.0003814827,0.00007105979,0.0007418233,0.000007778535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008264174,0.00026495973,0.7901066,0.00008973908,0.00010415712,0.000010871811,0.18856512,0.000034615256,0.000004100158,0.00006293358,0.006724119,0.013206368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008353351,0.0005105453,0.9071186,0.00053292466,0.000011999492,0.0000012429111,0.08738679,0.000010671429,0.0000057848997,0.000033084758,0.0034182654,0.00013472408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018471159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1548637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13639255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031143907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002099116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98806494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803531154","doi":"","title":"Gender Based Analysis (GBA) in Canada: What Can Sectoral Ministries do in India?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MPRA Paper","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender mainstreaming; Mainstreaming; Political science; Public administration; Prima facie; Realm; Process (computing); Economic growth; Public relations; Gender equality; Sociology; Economics; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.018185662047391422,"score_gpt":0.2482611725596205,"score_spread":0.23007551051222908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803531154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98237944,0.00046525983,0.00001367873,0.0003350725,0.00036179723,0.00012639952,0.00002323987,0.000011151468,0.016283963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977092,0.000101444624,0.00013015141,0.0016938054,0.000030376865,0.000013971288,0.000019337334,0.00000932267,0.00029240374],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823165,0.0003264369,0.00023929284,0.00028187403,0.00042961235,0.0004911483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944824,0.000107745065,0.000054809087,0.00020525325,0.000048395304,0.00013553591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004698514,0.00013646798,0.00025024335,0.0002114495,0.00014184059,0.00013563508,0.00018160263,0.00011551315,0.0005618016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010893227,0.00014071075,0.00006339235,0.0017357079,0.00009125125,0.0002187359,0.000012019533,0.00016684034,0.000003677095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032950995,0.000029722472,0.98700947,0.0000045777533,0.000028359445,0.000036252277,0.008607731,0.000665372,0.000011217394,0.0033006931,0.00016408773,0.00013922194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029616978,0.000005452805,0.9200827,0.00000438766,0.00003494803,1.3568645e-7,0.066827014,0.000118559175,0.0000069158277,0.00016221582,0.012266171,0.00019536319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86393696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13428354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007215106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003917747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6949915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803745111","doi":"10.1257/pandp.20181051","title":"On the Heterogeneity in Family Earnings and Income Dynamics in the PSID","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AEA Papers and Proceedings","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Earnings; Economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.016648199394482296,"score_gpt":0.26261770068436285,"score_spread":0.24596950128988054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803745111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93848956,0.000077443954,0.0000012146755,0.0019206266,0.000069538415,0.00019970808,0.0000025628945,0.000014631505,0.059224695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973385,0.00047614347,0.000026979384,0.0019440361,0.000072793184,0.000014052948,8.188749e-7,0.00000743265,0.00011929713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908566,0.000055270913,0.0001302163,0.00022311242,0.0002226984,0.00028306668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963695,0.00015300883,0.000050564322,0.00006308205,0.000046506946,0.0000498846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013532842,0.000110838446,0.00011278653,0.00005404201,0.0004800015,0.0001504059,0.00022252003,0.00010062845,0.000005782733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014240478,0.00006787063,0.000020488013,0.00035437813,0.00048715863,0.00010740349,0.000048118935,0.00021657372,0.000003085395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013101216,0.000019156898,0.8573564,0.0000092964365,0.0000045382703,0.0000017096442,0.050662607,2.986282e-7,0.00013581499,0.09029914,0.000091575515,0.0014063496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002166965,0.00011627178,0.91927856,0.00002821187,0.0000052384635,0.00000226007,0.07274779,0.00046741063,0.000003047042,0.004706361,0.0023027167,0.00012541538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016398288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066363653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08559278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060046303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026202835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37032476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805711468","doi":"10.1111/dech.12426","title":"The Invisible Hand that Rocks the Cradle: On the Limits of Time Use Surveys","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Development and Change","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Global Affairs Canada; Cornell University","keywords":"Subsidy; Context (archaeology); Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Work (physics); Economics; Public economics; Geography; Psychology","score_opus":0.12679037138610463,"score_gpt":0.2854585675878093,"score_spread":0.15866819620170466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805711468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98981094,0.00025560017,0.000053766133,0.0030894743,0.00031887484,0.0002929306,0.0000064445,0.000014995064,0.006156943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909282,0.00078666577,0.000028238694,0.0008281772,0.00018873146,0.000026513004,0.0000043367777,0.0000075402995,0.007201597],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894243,0.00026300957,0.00010888952,0.00012595908,0.00031072248,0.00024900513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991752,0.00045113193,0.00006895327,0.00016410823,0.000097554,0.00004307809],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017276198,0.00009347274,0.000084633655,0.000022816106,0.0018069397,0.00017889218,0.00028362323,0.00006076656,0.00003660075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000088262655,0.000043281772,0.000021152515,0.00020339806,0.00047376263,0.00008716422,0.00006244501,0.00007657724,0.00003733429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037728973,0.00010549386,0.27672568,0.000015041734,0.00015538764,0.0000021705587,0.6167271,5.715279e-7,0.000105911415,0.0133205075,0.01835588,0.07444852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000162342,0.000052268,0.71728194,0.000029086988,0.000010784675,3.3211555e-7,0.014513652,0.000079494865,0.000498278,0.00065127236,0.26656023,0.00016030441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006982428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01129285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60221344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022578648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008566162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807896016","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3175379","title":"How Falsifiable Is Collective Rationality?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Falsifiability; Rationality; Test (biology); Economics; Yield (engineering); Inference; Empirical evidence; Positive economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016927639727033407,"score_gpt":0.27727759197218327,"score_spread":0.26034995224514984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807896016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72935164,0.0024964649,0.061091337,0.024994522,0.002204121,0.0005204774,0.000024531371,0.00013691904,0.17918001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90649223,0.0016820404,0.00018422834,0.0005826798,0.0015257449,0.0000043241753,0.0000020408545,0.0000133184785,0.08951339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699545,0.00020740816,0.0001534296,0.00019700742,0.0005060832,0.0019406102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905646,0.00005693766,0.00012554589,0.000119131866,0.0005162232,0.00012572018],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002061632,0.00011567675,0.00013970243,0.00008855197,0.0017065329,0.00029965525,0.00031757393,0.00011614802,0.000120871686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015978793,0.00010977662,0.00009237576,0.0005054445,0.00028887278,0.00039583663,0.00002183269,0.0007609392,0.000053515854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002604987,0.00006414636,0.015342633,0.0000016396336,0.00015400752,0.0000012478087,0.016555628,0.0000027358715,0.00017335876,0.9611199,0.004787824,0.001770834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047344642,0.00026817637,0.0031038325,0.0000060697284,0.000029496312,0.000026187858,0.07576577,0.00011042606,0.000049294784,0.8292513,0.0906926,0.0002233959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059266447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014350987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17714061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001856969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009412529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808061779","doi":"","title":"The effect of babies on mother’s labor supply by education and race","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Scholars' Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Flexibility (engineering); Race (biology); Demographic economics; Census; Labour economics; Work (physics); Demography; Psychology; Economics; Geography; Population; Sociology; Gender studies; Engineering; Management","score_opus":0.00900670344495252,"score_gpt":0.2687323459350093,"score_spread":0.25972564249005675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808061779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07814454,0.008985716,0.0000027654435,0.00013161341,0.0011769746,0.0014499018,0.00019776826,0.00006554012,0.9098452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011604199,0.0018200653,0.00004003788,0.00016484594,0.0003131605,0.00014496174,0.00003279818,0.00005322287,0.98582673],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979123,0.0005713201,0.00026946355,0.00035738642,0.00055438856,0.0003351724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825186,0.0006576602,0.0002799126,0.00046448206,0.00021085044,0.00013521772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009841983,0.00029211844,0.00034606416,0.000058171376,0.00065056083,0.00038224665,0.0005612183,0.00046051873,0.000016200695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024621238,0.00021216607,0.00008968311,0.000020304866,0.0005876786,0.0001373896,0.00008194419,0.0005916323,0.000014976217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020302342,0.00011981411,0.009773275,0.00078291236,0.00046390702,0.0000019370675,0.036621526,0.0000048904867,0.0007409549,0.32172766,0.46466038,0.16489974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027749792,0.0001820388,0.0017564209,0.0001996183,0.00008110935,4.306668e-7,0.0006622357,0.0000038168237,0.00024223012,0.0044884,0.9918341,0.00027206825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012499334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028234397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52717376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011750292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000568804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8651881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809583945","doi":"10.55221/2572-7478.1931","title":"Harris's \"Created to live: Becoming the answer for an abortion-free community\" (book review)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œChristian librarian:/˜The œChristian librarian","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Horizon College and Seminary","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; History; Sociology; Biology; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.03710103160251193,"score_gpt":0.29512620375460996,"score_spread":0.258025172152098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809583945","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07596172,0.1396729,0.062996306,0.4546828,0.027476614,0.04639508,0.008097205,0.0075169886,0.17720038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7742756,0.0049105906,0.007989819,0.15666084,0.015759518,0.001924019,0.0012150991,0.00085723895,0.036407296],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988949,0.0044607557,0.0016966067,0.0012960754,0.0013541076,0.002243464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98929393,0.0023642937,0.0008868791,0.0055398885,0.00064247055,0.0012725514],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051369206,0.0011337249,0.0011275092,0.0003104666,0.01179693,0.0022911285,0.009443896,0.00069844484,0.002043001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011537495,0.000769312,0.0006323555,0.0025181256,0.0030879774,0.0027438782,0.0011305705,0.0018513863,0.0006780185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000247038,0.00033473544,0.0014657343,0.00018927547,0.0003019779,0.000013013866,0.0730655,0.000023723172,0.00006116499,0.030293452,0.8912023,0.0028021147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012793454,0.00065886386,0.0128199635,0.00056402263,0.0004422187,0.000019655328,0.058838196,0.0011364174,0.000024448867,0.008483133,0.9145109,0.0012228583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013657628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01515293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69831383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020492873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016625063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810055662","doi":"10.1190/tle37070488.1","title":"President's Page","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Leading Edge","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Maternity leave; Workforce; Parental leave; Family Leave; Feeling; Childbirth; Pregnancy; Family medicine; Work hours; Nursing; Work (physics); Medicine; Psychology; Demographic economics; Business; Political science; Sick leave; Law; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.039520589753962686,"score_gpt":0.31345529033047914,"score_spread":0.2739347005765165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810055662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60823566,0.00011785487,0.000581119,0.0017224108,0.0014245046,0.00012892837,0.0000021900435,0.00012613919,0.38766116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9540251,0.000058899277,0.00010083376,0.00062071707,0.0014492805,0.000003673437,7.745447e-7,0.000009039677,0.043731667],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919784,0.00012321987,0.00008065947,0.00012016259,0.00018945686,0.0002886637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995378,0.00010217004,0.000034031607,0.00021123742,0.000058195743,0.000056552803],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062871474,0.000060839142,0.000071065944,0.000023524224,0.000743969,0.00008672772,0.00038343665,0.000056706547,0.00010585864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012502175,0.000044509525,0.00003533297,0.00019103997,0.00042243034,0.00009312144,0.000043906788,0.00009434067,0.0011651159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016722268,0.000065957196,0.07395607,0.000015502517,0.000055659413,0.000007886896,0.35746768,0.000007017065,0.0027264496,0.33854663,0.21947429,0.007660148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032914002,0.00008754389,0.10398254,0.000035136985,0.000052673393,0.0000022289453,0.03036475,0.00036523057,0.0003280434,0.03722615,0.8268226,0.00040400383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055598794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018353547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60734826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004667347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000658568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810455782","doi":"10.1080/09614524.2018.1481932","title":"Assessing the impacts of a peer-to-peer training programme for women in Peru","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Development in Practice","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre; Government of Canada","keywords":"Peer effects; Psychology; Sample (material); Cohesion (chemistry); Peer review; Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Political science; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0877328405177801,"score_gpt":0.39734920128922113,"score_spread":0.30961636077144106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810455782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9581898,0.000016835262,0.0007020412,0.0074188383,0.000339977,0.0006385053,0.0000017981066,0.000021646054,0.03267056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582522,0.000009304547,0.039370913,0.00083614246,0.000098696284,0.00014821201,0.0000038146773,0.000012356981,0.0012683865],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978578,0.00023854061,0.00033669357,0.00020934861,0.00063202274,0.00072561175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802536,0.00093137316,0.00016911897,0.000120579716,0.0006292498,0.00012432615],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0103855,0.000103304614,0.00016392492,0.00013049929,0.00029751458,0.00020396445,0.00027756448,0.00008591654,0.000013863094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010182767,0.00008583157,0.000019956298,0.000753678,0.000118979384,0.0006553101,0.000050238625,0.00015784951,0.000008017124],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004045761,0.00014725412,0.04216135,0.000017473203,0.00002628506,0.0000033605727,0.91639775,0.0000073227543,0.00009255196,0.003077484,0.00019993042,0.037828777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034948258,0.000050738738,0.12742007,0.000035555233,0.00000557153,0.0000011652502,0.5544284,0.000076053744,0.00002170484,0.0005322789,0.316948,0.00013097348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075188145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044663143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36196932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048290784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017073068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W283688185","doi":"","title":"Stigmatized Identities and the Well-Being of Individuals without Homes: Effects of Multiple Intersecting Stigmas","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.008753628317873248,"score_gpt":0.23354729234294297,"score_spread":0.22479366402506973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W283688185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98819286,0.0004716526,0.005151805,0.00010835557,0.00017338007,0.00036120074,0.000008783225,0.000037069898,0.0054949257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816567,0.0002521671,0.00093247433,0.00003567691,0.00003451606,2.6450687e-7,0.0000043291207,0.00000712212,0.0005677854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985145,0.00034457044,0.0002263912,0.00019944238,0.00045467282,0.00026043842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982847,0.000826434,0.00041919656,0.00020068808,0.00018918204,0.0000797737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010168015,0.0001396709,0.00045169244,0.0001839544,0.00062023057,0.000048783448,0.0004139137,0.00011632858,0.000021574408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005138326,0.00013737794,0.0001528456,0.0003472708,0.0013742894,0.00038626298,0.00011047133,0.00014802367,0.0000020283303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008371087,0.00006099423,0.25008863,0.00021473374,0.00020909494,0.0000027409892,0.26415288,0.00006773165,0.00008026579,0.48492584,0.00006266838,0.00005070721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019705228,0.00007003679,0.06375885,0.00010176056,0.00015639036,7.6836426e-7,0.19810611,0.00022398448,0.0000052960577,0.73547065,0.00001767337,0.00011795398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031795963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00242615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25054482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055300712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009039495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56021094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28546466","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-4339-7_4","title":"Comparing the Economic Well-Being of Baby Boomers and Their Parents in Quebec and Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Baby boomers; Geography; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02433571350594289,"score_gpt":0.23252076225176851,"score_spread":0.20818504874582563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28546466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38569584,0.00045527547,0.000006187471,0.000037153186,0.00019087768,0.00014960622,0.0000024935418,0.000008048451,0.6134545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84636253,0.0010080829,0.000018788514,0.00006154928,0.000063392494,0.0000017768834,0.000005509533,0.000012594406,0.15246578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991977,0.000030188306,0.00024517413,0.00020043623,0.00009129601,0.00023519924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995261,0.00010849307,0.0001280742,0.00014201268,0.000015036254,0.000080327256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039222298,0.00017732702,0.00032040052,0.0000703895,0.00016184775,0.000057567882,0.00017281974,0.00017986979,0.00015918244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000028434422,0.00012913137,0.000046045643,0.000011052633,0.00035128658,0.00011884792,0.00009988549,0.00021772072,0.0000075858798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060755438,0.000005949178,0.5533632,0.000017854836,0.000054200867,4.4387073e-7,0.09275615,0.000013701852,0.0000013690742,0.3519819,0.00006320323,0.001735952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091256865,0.00003969634,0.5649135,0.00025952686,0.00011877022,0.0000021250592,0.08993424,0.0004760562,0.0000034625134,0.043543886,0.2987526,0.0010435695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73651266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46098876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035291223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002454341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5265824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W287098224","doi":"","title":"Earning and Caring in Canadian Families","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.017728991461498454,"score_gpt":0.26159520476164555,"score_spread":0.2438662133001471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W287098224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69125676,0.000067270674,0.000020183747,0.00024399221,0.000065599546,0.00003195306,3.8585938e-7,0.00001532735,0.30829853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99525744,0.000551154,0.00016057183,0.000229235,0.000038053324,0.0000013356968,7.26521e-7,0.0000031430322,0.0037583248],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994423,0.000029928422,0.00005723639,0.00009268255,0.00007603397,0.00030181286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975604,0.000023564444,0.00000763725,0.000042077943,0.000016333319,0.0001543205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024023016,0.000038078408,0.000052205552,0.00009475077,0.0002242472,0.000044868757,0.000059033595,0.00004786305,0.000044576067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005395699,0.000039153547,0.000007747965,0.00020417968,0.000058562007,0.00008044272,0.000010540771,0.00006230963,0.0000067798396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.523664e-7,0.0000014762123,0.9655148,7.878182e-7,9.785457e-7,0.000007112987,0.0176128,0.0000302471,0.0000054006414,0.014871429,0.000025131503,0.0019296249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006885351,0.0000035621615,0.8809712,0.0000038958533,0.0000011736396,5.5691885e-7,0.07592856,0.00054170506,3.13281e-7,0.0004797985,0.04192831,0.000072086754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9720974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99762064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30454022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009637169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002040447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17247507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884208588","doi":"10.1111/irj.12223","title":"Sexual orientation, labour supply and occupational sorting in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Relations Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Earnings; Spouse; Sorting; sort; Psychology; Demographic economics; Orientation (vector space); Labour economics; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05207163463087765,"score_gpt":0.3132243415571717,"score_spread":0.26115270692629405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884208588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939149,0.000027290413,0.0004917402,0.0012082902,0.0013079777,0.00009958754,0.000024597397,0.000008008846,0.0029176148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967047,0.000015371097,0.00047420102,0.00012879104,0.0017044074,0.0000021472688,0.00000876161,0.0000058340283,0.00095577055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986321,0.00018810363,0.00036455464,0.0001242691,0.0004305741,0.00026041418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912417,0.00018972544,0.00017646757,0.000054701635,0.0002936645,0.00016129283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008238514,0.000070217044,0.00009130772,0.00012384696,0.0009862906,0.000121955454,0.000103274535,0.000118208074,0.00034519835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011040018,0.00007367438,0.000012900127,0.0004893179,0.00012636987,0.00032835835,0.000016663256,0.00040081065,0.0000074717677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001226,0.000008904865,0.9793709,2.9430248e-7,0.000008260876,0.0000050987946,0.004281536,0.00018702743,0.000007790707,0.010150493,0.0027012154,0.0032662293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009233882,0.00003394542,0.94916695,0.0000141515675,0.000011228666,0.000013090327,0.029513324,0.00037343477,0.0000018184711,0.0029633162,0.016859222,0.00012615512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65746754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.942847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28537947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067165034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068871332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885557256","doi":"10.11575/sppp.v11i0.44203","title":"Social Policy Trends: Social Assistance Caseloads in Alberta by Family Composition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Composition (language); Social policy; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.03166275570997712,"score_gpt":0.3556218925323162,"score_spread":0.32395913682233907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885557256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6665561,0.000032897144,0.0000027320586,0.003840261,0.00014954162,0.00017858612,0.00006024091,0.000025217898,0.3291544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99114215,0.000679733,0.0000691836,0.000435253,0.0012190525,0.000043144006,0.00004830641,0.000030280014,0.0063328906],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970081,0.0005922686,0.0004136468,0.000530999,0.000368238,0.0010867387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991543,0.00024620126,0.00010215113,0.00020487914,0.00013196484,0.00016044732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014478604,0.0001788309,0.0003459474,0.00046564016,0.0011565936,0.00016381097,0.00049330626,0.00034613133,0.000059715047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014018825,0.00022021563,0.00012559386,0.0008227298,0.0012629613,0.00024863274,0.000106399086,0.0005004791,0.000023741233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078117725,0.001970123,0.11661196,0.00008915436,0.0006160909,0.000084929416,0.24038203,0.00009191979,0.0044609434,0.17427966,0.020889292,0.4397427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004200388,0.00038810197,0.5612798,0.000046097703,0.00006257849,0.0000049255377,0.081479326,0.0025874071,0.000072904244,0.008772485,0.33932954,0.0017764604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019362446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09440668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44466782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017672275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007635042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9871677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886010202","doi":"","title":"Heterogeneity and Long-Run Changes in U.S. Hours and the Labor Wedge","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Wedge (geometry); Labour economics; Economics; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.01899096978374902,"score_gpt":0.26305997770123696,"score_spread":0.24406900791748792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886010202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797303,0.009618636,0.00001193684,0.0014667156,0.0014338448,0.00040145117,0.000047396323,0.00005641408,0.0072332863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99538374,0.002701954,0.000101322745,0.00083578296,0.0004688269,0.000038865142,0.0000035411108,0.000018103268,0.00044789386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982603,0.00036570142,0.00023185984,0.0003048967,0.00019017475,0.0006470631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989501,0.00034451875,0.000121973215,0.0002441566,0.000052024632,0.00028722655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015851771,0.00020820907,0.00033272756,0.00012136913,0.0004969275,0.00010242249,0.00022546899,0.00019488408,0.00009717208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016888817,0.0001715534,0.000055429347,0.00022335809,0.0016809517,0.00031140482,0.00010081567,0.0002334138,0.00003494756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015220903,0.00004094801,0.97906846,0.000011109222,0.000023001114,0.0000025325414,0.011503968,4.6276972e-7,0.0000116379,0.008417089,0.00031566515,0.0005899265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000997896,0.000016513086,0.9859246,0.000017074835,0.000027658836,0.000012269783,0.0068324776,0.000019169092,0.000015979254,0.00025684733,0.0056398497,0.00023968931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010038383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046296496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04529266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012031766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015890769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9711061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886081541","doi":"10.1016/j.rie.2018.07.006","title":"The impact of universal child benefits on family health and behaviours","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Exploit; Child health; Cash transfers; Economics; Child care; Cash; Demographic economics; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Public economics; Medicine; Nursing; Finance; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.08872170474274858,"score_gpt":0.39830840614509394,"score_spread":0.30958670140234534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886081541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799536,0.00042987656,0.0000013358239,0.0009454756,0.00009577366,0.00021482333,0.000042660537,0.0000061543083,0.01831031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98409253,0.015620629,0.000023818819,0.000046956,0.00011538278,0.0000021063336,0.0000029380185,0.000007849997,0.000087789136],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880326,0.0002468994,0.00015044122,0.0001670392,0.0001361099,0.00049623667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992011,0.00026275663,0.00005266553,0.0001852748,0.00009605874,0.00020211362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022859434,0.000061095794,0.00011516468,0.0001384963,0.0007571788,0.00006554272,0.0002807554,0.00006627691,0.0000033664128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007712885,0.000049828337,0.000034987755,0.00020854284,0.0008436906,0.000090596084,0.000067207104,0.00022583187,0.0000062116655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021314315,0.00023204913,0.41286448,0.000009853795,0.00004478381,0.0000025341428,0.03187139,0.0006419721,0.0000050096833,0.3980792,0.0015422739,0.15449333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049104454,0.0010288899,0.95781976,0.000038607348,0.0000011846737,7.2291886e-7,0.031902507,0.002223613,0.0000038693015,0.003654584,0.0027125343,0.00012269917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024830366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020381011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54495525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005188551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007767932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99749446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886117772","doi":"10.1108/ijssp-11-2017-0160","title":"Combining diaries and interviews in time-use studies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Disadvantaged; Poverty; Perception; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Social psychology; Qualitative research; Social science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0654216110126624,"score_gpt":0.40270415135260745,"score_spread":0.33728254033994504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886117772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855394,0.0005881764,0.00002287782,0.012323118,0.00059702015,0.0000337069,0.00000620413,0.0000057781263,0.0008837615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99316114,0.0023251304,0.00010206681,0.0020314024,0.0021050405,9.513984e-7,0.0000011350157,0.000004260842,0.0002688715],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903387,0.00027803957,0.00027785072,0.000080100755,0.00017107124,0.00015904577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909955,0.0002585523,0.0001967694,0.000020979653,0.00038194863,0.000042200627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088896987,0.00007160716,0.00022033298,0.00016851768,0.00029664536,0.000058287405,0.00019500781,0.00013703448,0.000009982131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057709473,0.00006473294,0.00004700276,0.000050921262,0.002241078,0.00024516403,0.000092001625,0.00019006882,0.0000040923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005860636,0.000045572575,0.2156287,0.000004427485,0.00024037278,0.000014596371,0.58595794,2.8778697e-7,0.00006547186,0.19258177,0.0012143685,0.0041878596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015156647,0.00023003636,0.5637388,0.00006393175,0.000033956145,0.000023745419,0.14786072,0.000023018889,0.0000062609515,0.26991954,0.016367916,0.00021636402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007015741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006463764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43809724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011060597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016297527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82573456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886855633","doi":"","title":"Tax Topics -- Child and Family Benefits","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.019047488479502314,"score_gpt":0.2523817781947515,"score_spread":0.23333428971524917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886855633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3837695,0.0006116436,0.00024208131,0.0006848052,0.00029543354,0.00007932809,0.0000038688995,0.000042728494,0.6142706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791039,0.0014401455,0.0014522282,0.001830862,0.00013737543,0.0000029300822,0.0000014767625,0.0000067422875,0.016024321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993296,0.00005135119,0.000085979074,0.00014701215,0.00016147982,0.00022456117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971277,0.0000199906,0.00001911595,0.00009957548,0.000043296197,0.00010523824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021307728,0.00006707592,0.00007918178,0.00002527743,0.0003695719,0.00005745722,0.000084076295,0.00008275396,0.00006896211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000699814,0.00006145118,0.000022859926,0.00014226098,0.00009046493,0.00008256754,0.000014003915,0.00006734514,0.000018077202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.419753e-7,0.000019918967,0.049678776,0.000002573085,0.0000057636157,7.0518166e-7,0.004274799,0.000007884153,0.000007829296,0.94100624,0.0010869744,0.0039079646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003271631,0.000031892938,0.25248247,0.000008609204,0.000013163878,0.0000019117597,0.034029454,0.000051334137,0.000016413998,0.009001288,0.7037606,0.00027564506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075418863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00238038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.932005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001914468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005250305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28424856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889044736","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2017-030","title":"Dynamics of Permanent Exit from Welfare in Ontario, Canada: Duration Dependence and Heterogeneity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Duration (music); Nonparametric statistics; Economics; Demographic economics; Population; Hazard; Proportional hazards model; Hazard ratio; Econometrics; Demography; Statistics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02029581945846852,"score_gpt":0.25057488766341834,"score_spread":0.2302790682049498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889044736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96934354,0.000035761816,0.000012831951,0.013142809,0.00021669024,0.00013099585,0.00030067496,0.00000852469,0.016808197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985898,0.000033638033,0.00006034606,0.00079349725,0.0001450527,0.000005211193,0.00008809748,0.000007963356,0.00027638194],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987382,0.00007995208,0.0002132407,0.00022226905,0.00024222439,0.0005040938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895024,0.00002038849,0.00007229256,0.00019369269,0.00015087432,0.00061251613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020452391,0.00010320437,0.00014146676,0.00035468434,0.00036864675,0.00007236598,0.00026236373,0.0001254066,0.0001277501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001721749,0.00012091981,0.000019207697,0.000494381,0.00025533192,0.0002018933,0.000029453482,0.00012332294,0.0000018651815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017750971,0.000008821639,0.8513768,0.000003569135,0.000012411243,0.0000101791375,0.005464473,0.0000013786641,0.000006351126,0.1412121,0.0006387207,0.0012634273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013205224,0.000012247,0.9758022,0.000005557829,0.000003897861,0.0000013003873,0.003428485,0.00033419134,0.000003204437,0.001642223,0.018498754,0.00013591371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13956988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036599862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018791456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9867711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889704134","doi":"10.3386/w20829","title":"Patronage Politics and the Development of the Welfare State: Confederate Pensions in the American South","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Welfare; Welfare state; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.23449769622750122,"score_gpt":0.46594719279121755,"score_spread":0.23144949656371633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889704134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93177736,0.00010469668,0.000006989037,0.009943869,0.00015602304,0.00080322515,0.00014911067,0.0000037198902,0.05705503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907714,0.00012521095,0.00014245574,0.00008304015,0.00007035411,0.000052025807,0.000031257787,0.000008279967,0.000410226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691373,0.0011847452,0.0004406512,0.00023731777,0.0009125885,0.00031097795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766654,0.0009250132,0.00029376076,0.00026185368,0.0007924952,0.00006031754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008471632,0.000109686924,0.00026907373,0.00014644145,0.0006457922,0.00011007118,0.00088370277,0.00008809695,0.00001437737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007102114,0.00006320483,0.00006603615,0.00016215914,0.002236556,0.000035193967,0.0005532127,0.00063919753,0.000003716557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000314695,0.000034470457,0.014313862,0.000023768316,0.00005158021,2.6674658e-7,0.07263705,0.0012919499,0.0000018159295,0.9110056,0.00040002333,0.00020812069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067894737,0.000017213175,0.18422346,0.000035225283,0.00000959264,4.7659736e-7,0.13327299,0.0013976108,0.0000039072747,0.67773485,0.0024802897,0.00014545956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010118469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015177392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23327078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003915182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045388415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99647325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889874248","doi":"10.1177/0973801018786133","title":"Educational Attainment and the Gender Gap in Childcare in Canada: A Decomposition Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Margin The Journal of Applied Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Educational attainment; Gender gap; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Time-use survey; Set (abstract data type); General Social Survey; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Sociology; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.044010996070243565,"score_gpt":0.3566755094020217,"score_spread":0.31266451333177814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889874248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.971993,0.00018553718,0.000023592624,0.0062308656,0.00009748439,0.00022128041,0.0000036169772,5.954864e-7,0.021244027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988291,0.0006102695,0.00005992924,0.00016962035,0.0002605205,0.000008999596,0.0000015750145,0.0000043953387,0.000055568562],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845654,0.00045875806,0.0003332549,0.00010730262,0.0003467317,0.00029743495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988948,0.0006855537,0.00012115713,0.00013645335,0.00008584448,0.000076178476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070496406,0.000060784616,0.00018007706,0.00028059963,0.0003596817,0.000067350375,0.00040424155,0.000034320274,0.00015156557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034364246,0.000039835515,0.00003632598,0.00040686358,0.00044888593,0.00006072898,0.00006831467,0.00032807924,0.0000055061223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009594694,0.00010005846,0.68327475,0.000013860346,0.00049729145,0.000004236418,0.10425435,0.01440766,0.000044539596,0.19019453,0.0039397464,0.0023095105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097424607,0.000015675643,0.87142307,0.0000062078875,0.000035970334,0.0000027037054,0.084533095,0.0039369063,0.00000524582,0.038241874,0.0007470791,0.00007791207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45652562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93618727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47966164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018812786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021901873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5470934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889999169","doi":"10.3386/w9782","title":"The Married Widow: Marriage Penalties Matter!","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Australian National University","keywords":"Spouse; Government (linguistics); Pension; Economics; Empirical evidence; Identification (biology); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Public economics; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.22073334426816088,"score_gpt":0.4805751705316623,"score_spread":0.25984182626350144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889999169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06254166,0.0008233335,0.000015546111,0.0064505297,0.0017160847,0.000849561,0.00013825593,0.000020587204,0.92744446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95090765,0.0026019942,0.00028169595,0.00017268816,0.0008270052,0.00016011126,0.00012500712,0.000034943703,0.044888888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959707,0.0010109342,0.0005549739,0.0004877093,0.0013353296,0.00064032234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962869,0.0018169776,0.0002518754,0.00044604798,0.0010424082,0.00015575429],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0089628035,0.00018841124,0.00030518585,0.00030011506,0.0011375193,0.00039068758,0.0013778973,0.00041751255,0.0010523658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090415066,0.00016760737,0.0001834465,0.00016390305,0.0013001554,0.00012076433,0.0004733972,0.0009905663,0.0004418058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002886993,0.00003364861,0.009380259,0.00004752681,0.00010399263,9.946688e-7,0.0020239016,0.0005682169,0.0000136021235,0.92166215,0.06596162,0.00017519703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002159042,0.000016783175,0.009634492,0.000029275534,0.0000075105963,6.705767e-7,0.004970338,0.00028117117,0.000008739535,0.9480788,0.03655496,0.00020131966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004579118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032101716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.888366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012034703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003777545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890511472","doi":"10.3368/jhr.45.1.1","title":"Evidence from Maternity Leave Expansions of the Impact of Maternal Care on Early Child Development","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Human Resources","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of California, Davis; McMaster University","keywords":"Maternity leave; Child care; Maternity care; Child development; Psychology; Temperament; Medicine; Nursing; Developmental psychology; Health care; Economics; Economic growth; Personality; Social psychology; Sick leave","score_opus":0.029502455631711506,"score_gpt":0.3026050062275276,"score_spread":0.2731025505958161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890511472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983332,0.00024439223,0.0000032316468,0.000101949874,0.00022603438,0.0000940344,0.000016403998,0.0000049174914,0.00097579823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952143,0.000077998266,0.000056907942,0.000018509132,0.00020763755,4.4195573e-7,2.3640484e-7,0.0000084607145,0.0001083552],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836403,0.00030766873,0.00040189637,0.0000712945,0.0006745948,0.00018048538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859774,0.00018524945,0.00063846144,0.00025179965,0.00024672045,0.00008005342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008175966,0.00010887972,0.0002085032,0.00006380542,0.00063243,0.000044819615,0.0009992896,0.000071838665,0.00011966861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102339385,0.00005367792,0.00016372655,0.000104065446,0.00038291642,0.00009632871,0.00008718341,0.00042805012,0.0000029143675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006654212,0.000048307134,0.64858055,0.000009065805,0.00007862884,0.0000018292244,0.3358889,0.00019186387,0.014644011,0.000057086527,0.000053195803,0.00038002175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013838892,0.00013359314,0.9726285,0.00034006446,0.00003289738,0.0000029770786,0.022342889,0.0000017702189,0.0039781816,0.00027858838,0.00006236324,0.00005980515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008374716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037836838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32404792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005727711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016307512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890529847","doi":"10.3386/w15942","title":"Who Pays Cigarette Taxes? The Impact of Consumer Price Search","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Excise; Economics; Residence; Price dispersion; Monetary economics; Carton; Advertising; Business; Microeconomics; Demographic economics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.21205960610434735,"score_gpt":0.49483456197009135,"score_spread":0.28277495586574397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890529847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75155884,0.0004595081,0.000022770026,0.0016477589,0.0004384624,0.0009757097,0.00062918937,0.000014110306,0.24425367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946619,0.0018059008,0.0001144321,0.000024113138,0.00055579323,0.000055292316,0.000113209506,0.00002568394,0.0026436578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573994,0.0008240413,0.0006018381,0.0005022042,0.001682125,0.00064985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99412245,0.002284589,0.00032785133,0.0005817046,0.0024925796,0.00019085119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010757113,0.00020419437,0.00044941698,0.00049662887,0.00046310265,0.00015066462,0.0017445494,0.00068307685,0.0007141265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013701174,0.00016110514,0.00035127086,0.0003115268,0.002034081,0.00013289391,0.0006999591,0.0022317902,0.000053085743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008643511,0.00019108599,0.05213998,0.00011811367,0.0006318668,0.0000018619695,0.01017341,0.0076457933,0.00036914618,0.89512926,0.03266211,0.0008509472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007896434,0.00014967954,0.14568053,0.00013694286,0.00003317297,0.0000026306043,0.0053375,0.010237953,0.00017584124,0.8314886,0.0054124473,0.000555061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0367494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031167285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24310309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011439243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008043826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99757963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891732408","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3217476","title":"Gender Segregation in Education and its Implications for Labour Market Outcomes: Evidence from India","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Bordeaux; Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Earnings; Gender gap; Gender disparity; Demographic economics; Set (abstract data type); Test (biology); Life course approach; Longitudinal data; Economics; Labour economics; Psychology; Demography; Sociology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.03386238825319146,"score_gpt":0.3420540547412814,"score_spread":0.30819166648808993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891732408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97708833,0.011133956,0.005821316,0.0030043002,0.0012580481,0.0008561311,0.00010072429,0.000031504154,0.0007056783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95919186,0.037046187,0.0009053713,0.00022464701,0.00075303233,0.00012212353,0.000049568986,0.000026973965,0.0016802639],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724257,0.00031677532,0.00042517876,0.00043668284,0.00027424408,0.001304536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839354,0.00031608032,0.00042788175,0.00023686886,0.0004925665,0.00013305564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031129797,0.00022191802,0.00027680892,0.00023453828,0.0005162892,0.0002289064,0.00051209686,0.00040187544,0.000031631233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007703727,0.00022476734,0.00010502445,0.00022852594,0.00007543954,0.000339166,0.000106913074,0.0014538673,0.000005310791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031141575,0.0001435596,0.7321659,0.000054572887,0.00018243982,1.7189384e-7,0.01549265,0.00002227595,0.00004350922,0.23905294,0.0004955714,0.012315265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014782621,0.000020589678,0.4798426,0.00006440118,0.000039681763,0.0000026665534,0.007616884,0.00008037243,6.5276544e-7,0.51171046,0.0003195112,0.00015437421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001974789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020208146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2726575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002121826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014929216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99767053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892028872","doi":"10.1017/s0022050717000067","title":"Women's Income and Marriage Markets in the United States: Evidence from the Civil War Pension","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"The Journal of Economic History","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Remarriage; Pension; Demographic economics; Marital status; Economics; Spanish Civil War; Endogeneity; Labour economics; Political science; Demography; Population; Law; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.05063000298395224,"score_gpt":0.2740300939784383,"score_spread":0.22340009099448607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892028872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839099,0.008894237,0.00002147014,0.0024678758,0.0025877487,0.00024672574,0.000025505375,0.0000060251955,0.0018404849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95457554,0.043532625,0.000022373835,0.00072525506,0.00056692987,0.000005595035,0.0000040953323,0.00001590945,0.0005516481],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681807,0.0019041,0.00054105563,0.0001865818,0.00026215267,0.00028803217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955224,0.0023258694,0.0012426402,0.00072335184,0.00008599528,0.00009977974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010170552,0.00019824036,0.00038190885,0.00012700212,0.0005993875,0.00009730921,0.002187195,0.00018615203,0.00019623653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004788713,0.000111685804,0.00010225395,0.00003338275,0.00081484416,0.00022521254,0.00035423163,0.0011352707,0.000013319189],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003292956,0.000045428977,0.030671293,0.00004356614,0.00016583203,0.00004465081,0.93840533,0.0029246747,0.000019586289,0.00027169735,0.026424568,0.0006540766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008788519,0.00010667579,0.5932934,0.0010244775,0.00022488373,0.00002280361,0.18255028,0.003002417,3.1057294e-7,0.03920873,0.17913331,0.0005538431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015169481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016208062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.755855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024801528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011192644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892051431","doi":"10.3386/w10541","title":"Incentive Effects of Social Assistance: A Regression Discontinuity Approach","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Regression discontinuity design; Incentive; Flexibility (engineering); Economics; Difference in differences; Estimator; Discontinuity (linguistics); Regression; Econometrics; Control (management); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15298204666534618,"score_gpt":0.4774355862439091,"score_spread":0.32445353957856293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892051431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51540816,0.0006418015,0.0004448999,0.0006947422,0.0010161976,0.0016898179,0.00023468157,0.00003120903,0.4798385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996453,0.00033632803,0.00065504014,0.000008796638,0.00057703204,0.00009885808,0.00020660034,0.000019100578,0.0016452823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620277,0.000744119,0.00053947594,0.00056584855,0.0014916752,0.00045612402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730146,0.0007064571,0.00049029774,0.00022939502,0.0011649131,0.00010749753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00376824,0.0001922165,0.0005384705,0.0004125796,0.00043252567,0.00007839309,0.000863855,0.0006168977,0.00004469727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083235966,0.00019239495,0.00025167453,0.00025173204,0.0012739651,0.00014927947,0.000548269,0.00094766304,0.000009669204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007972062,0.00033800353,0.0054906583,0.00063387817,0.00014312708,0.0000013045857,0.015103473,0.000726915,0.00013171119,0.9754746,0.0014537394,0.00042290226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009542612,0.00004914444,0.061380357,0.00031924385,0.00002480437,1.7106245e-7,0.0060968837,0.00059148035,0.00017647765,0.92975414,0.0003575764,0.000295445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003401174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008140768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4810448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023328457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004495578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7974962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892240300","doi":"10.3386/w23453","title":"The Impact of Student Debt on Education, Career, and Marriage Choices of Female Lawyers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Debt; Student debt; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economics; Psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.2595370040466756,"score_gpt":0.5447399373471719,"score_spread":0.28520293330049623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892240300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79125935,0.0008322338,5.969956e-7,0.0003957726,0.0003739455,0.00047665375,0.00012145026,0.0000028947413,0.20653708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947777,0.002917928,0.00004001959,0.0000048094876,0.0002714644,0.000042150114,0.000043638578,0.00000974966,0.0018925554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795246,0.00030273473,0.0003898071,0.00028352786,0.00082852354,0.00024295252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965432,0.0011800966,0.0004595836,0.00039822405,0.0013218869,0.000096969015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004212708,0.000115991264,0.00027987233,0.00025087342,0.0004621851,0.00012723748,0.0010560104,0.0002055731,0.000043186887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007854168,0.00009289696,0.00014064607,0.000060603965,0.0010278935,0.000086822605,0.00031211576,0.0003529094,0.00000409258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006302291,0.000231622,0.31611258,0.00010984736,0.00031601454,1.7235438e-7,0.007707771,0.0022480576,0.00004942909,0.6686063,0.002816171,0.0017390534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002853728,0.00012151431,0.65148485,0.000104386265,0.000011993683,1.8234006e-7,0.0088068,0.00020281237,0.000029038858,0.3383285,0.00049479504,0.00012976574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028202083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048625013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33537224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006564154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005350645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9782692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892816536","doi":"","title":"Creating gender-balanced obituaries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VIURRSpace (Vancouver Island University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02114727681396117,"score_gpt":0.2466813081512925,"score_spread":0.22553403133733133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892816536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04592163,0.000042935495,0.00371274,0.0003845145,0.0014841451,0.00018608617,0.000043311094,0.00013952565,0.9480851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8386095,0.00032084528,0.00056121417,0.00007898974,0.00026479422,4.8075225e-7,7.1406475e-7,0.000014542087,0.16014893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985778,0.00010388807,0.00009408509,0.00035523777,0.0003484841,0.00052054104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988414,0.000086567255,0.00020315929,0.0005178702,0.00016476752,0.00018621881],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022007943,0.00018229995,0.0002308356,0.00014260759,0.0037275285,0.00027385424,0.0007478475,0.00018186888,0.000113521266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018253153,0.00019825685,0.00010761221,0.00021199239,0.0005043365,0.0007100987,0.00016793067,0.00019551301,0.00003567069],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024316028,0.0003399886,0.14944158,0.000118028576,0.00040601596,0.0006321302,0.15527461,0.00068374426,0.00047097175,0.3389249,0.35036394,0.0031009114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015373823,0.000053078802,0.01776797,0.00003819979,0.00008952611,7.848709e-7,0.109884866,0.00033935672,0.000022656763,0.0019222705,0.86776257,0.00058133993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03362202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79268783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021375806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003341416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894713174","doi":"10.1007/s11150-020-09535-6","title":"Gender inequality as a barrier to economic growth: a review of the theoretical literature","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation","keywords":"Inequality; Economics; Gender inequality; Human capital; Capital (architecture); Fertility; Neoclassical economics; Positive economics; Development economics; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Population; Geography","score_opus":0.06009120244544467,"score_gpt":0.3301604575159813,"score_spread":0.2700692550705366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894713174","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012931637,0.98520184,0.000002654143,0.00090553355,0.0010647026,0.0025385288,0.0015523289,0.000012656832,0.008592451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011712085,0.99482924,0.00014111855,0.0042986535,0.0002343701,0.00008512018,0.00003421444,0.00007483555,0.00018530907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939527,0.0020839607,0.0026033472,0.00063906657,0.0002798597,0.000441081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943339,0.0005771393,0.00233276,0.002242839,0.00029928918,0.00021406311],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047053765,0.0005593458,0.004200947,0.00008971126,0.0001635511,0.000047752732,0.0029508583,0.00045056237,0.0002579613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021393187,0.00034692205,0.0032079152,0.00070264173,0.0007328699,0.00011744084,0.00082516146,0.00061161665,0.000017283535],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018714213,0.000063878215,0.0000557687,0.40940374,0.00033941443,6.300426e-7,0.00054849946,0.0000032416658,8.674885e-8,0.5658796,0.003930849,0.019772405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052779225,0.000013312225,0.000012619454,0.30599463,0.0010534971,0.00000745066,0.000062045314,7.0338433e-7,9.323261e-7,0.0033350992,0.68917996,0.00028697483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012171814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059722533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6852491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038179194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029957306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894967857","doi":"","title":"Essays on Parental Leave and Family Labour Supply","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Parental leave; Labour supply; Economics; Business; Work (physics); Engineering","score_opus":0.06987744860244037,"score_gpt":0.31494720414836574,"score_spread":0.24506975554592536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894967857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894836,0.000066490335,0.0001256643,0.00029648235,0.00071182224,0.00026428842,0.00009142793,0.00019330293,0.008766916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851423,0.00026250837,0.00003895847,0.00095722516,0.00040676835,0.0000011675713,0.000015974354,0.000033861506,0.013141228],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974966,0.00040740176,0.00019333928,0.0006300901,0.00057273527,0.0006998101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986979,0.00011235142,0.00012890977,0.0003893801,0.0002368782,0.00043461367],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051016104,0.00029859846,0.00028084614,0.000342007,0.0010973535,0.0003921432,0.00070886995,0.0003001095,0.00005346995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057113193,0.0003408462,0.0000933935,0.0005643759,0.0007459889,0.0011030206,0.00025301558,0.00044428455,0.00034651862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006661754,0.00008074709,0.9863661,0.00001202988,0.000034240227,0.00008882765,0.0057325577,0.0000014061046,0.00020573607,0.0069230157,0.000005315663,0.00048338843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008185611,0.00024138788,0.9728112,0.00007000158,0.000041058312,0.0000045022825,0.013113448,3.5111617e-7,0.00008963445,0.0007515982,0.01165636,0.00040184887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013197435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012846021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01355487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026097236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019591127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896525793","doi":"","title":"Female employment and Spousal abuse: A parallel cross-country analysis of developing countries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Endogeneity; Domestic violence; Instrumental variable; Latin Americans; Spouse; East Asia; Demographic economics; Estimation; Developing country; Economics; Geography; Development economics; Poison control; Political science; Economic growth; Suicide prevention; China; Medicine","score_opus":0.023666502585576028,"score_gpt":0.30515756148459483,"score_spread":0.2814910588990188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896525793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98338044,0.002483511,0.0012234176,0.00012358693,0.002983433,0.0006101045,0.0007615476,0.00015965811,0.008274327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844016,0.007023097,0.005091744,0.0005814042,0.00072870124,0.000093079354,0.00019186485,0.00006647481,0.0018220326],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958676,0.00024312682,0.0011512033,0.0011428598,0.0007384014,0.00085681357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968789,0.00037759723,0.0009570058,0.0008134552,0.0006617353,0.00031131014],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016814471,0.00059682917,0.0014243476,0.0007340811,0.00087173434,0.0004432659,0.00080780295,0.0008934493,0.0005934592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018117239,0.0006620908,0.0003868279,0.00069647684,0.0033625562,0.00028717585,0.00043797644,0.000507917,0.000047312136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003106619,0.0000612224,0.96388376,0.00014131323,0.0015511191,0.000011953757,0.02409742,0.00026479503,0.0000025303493,0.009497548,0.0004226348,0.000034657653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056241016,0.00004496903,0.96299917,0.0001830219,0.0011576142,0.000004598984,0.0067917253,0.00042130836,0.00000809239,0.0008014896,0.026020462,0.00100513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036960028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020595225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025597828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007902029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028315228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897956769","doi":"10.3917/anso.182.0341","title":"Satisfaction With Work-Life Balance: Couples with Egalitarian Practices in their Transition to First-Time Parenthood in Spain","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Année sociologique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.02708339911201291,"score_gpt":0.28025070604909635,"score_spread":0.25316730693708345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897956769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97116554,0.0008893422,0.0029681204,0.022193719,0.00041597072,0.00084424514,0.00007183602,0.000084976265,0.001366263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99380684,0.0016569697,0.0023069372,0.001251665,0.0005395779,0.00011151714,0.00003933576,0.000030200374,0.00025694753],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963451,0.0015220185,0.0004035902,0.00064458477,0.00030317897,0.0007815388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836403,0.00061675604,0.00036121663,0.00025233463,0.0001920381,0.00021364879],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022737607,0.0003541076,0.00047314662,0.00013007455,0.00041453418,0.00009097234,0.0002517284,0.0007352801,0.00012855085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039613358,0.0002873678,0.000060004462,0.0011676279,0.0010602558,0.0005997457,0.00002550829,0.0007044319,0.00007760266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036823272,0.00020546756,0.85681635,0.000046304092,0.000050390077,0.00001882138,0.13663612,0.0018035868,0.000027080116,0.002587222,0.00014871628,0.001291687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074824045,0.0011058751,0.86410224,0.0003974561,0.000030142452,0.0000028232375,0.12879243,0.0012708231,0.0000041035128,0.0015437396,0.0015408878,0.00046122365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017508667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2506432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23313452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048240143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071220676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899005368","doi":"10.1111/caje.12358","title":"Group income and individual preferences for redistribution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Redistribution of income and wealth; Ethnic group; Demographic economics; Robustness (evolution); Economics; Survey data collection; Sample (material); Microeconomics; Statistics; Mathematics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.12883638545848816,"score_gpt":0.22232503462768619,"score_spread":0.09348864916919802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899005368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946054,0.00016183694,0.00034714516,0.00079352903,0.0018929704,0.00026031208,0.00058257027,0.0000060920634,0.0013501148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970262,0.00013572349,0.0007672972,0.00023364846,0.0016535928,0.000010648339,0.00003141241,0.000018363635,0.00012312627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985282,0.00007406143,0.00049362006,0.00023982057,0.0000041760904,0.0006601341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750113,0.0001525211,0.00038757257,0.0001490949,0.0003176115,0.0014920811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013078073,0.000158819,0.00032795742,0.0003344564,0.00062262465,0.00022139802,0.000439821,0.00021748667,0.00006195163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035465902,0.00019074549,0.00009515796,0.00010772015,0.00061566214,0.0004427047,0.00001530056,0.00017096104,0.0000031843651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032265423,0.0000060976367,0.0780304,0.000017402726,0.00009048609,0.000007453804,0.010925997,0.000017253256,0.0000046545056,0.90701556,0.0004488703,0.0034035516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010940034,0.0010250245,0.07542991,0.00008630743,0.00010167254,0.000079758094,0.014305612,0.00043415625,0.00001736634,0.8398541,0.067005955,0.0005661081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14851937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84560066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010786914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026199177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85715073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900049453","doi":"","title":"La politique des services de garde à 5 $/jour et l'offre de travail des mères québécoises : résultats d'une expérience naturelle canadienne","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Subsidy; Political science; Geography; Demography; Socioeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012122150418794747,"score_gpt":0.24188807839116677,"score_spread":0.22976592797237202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900049453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646157,0.009653197,0.00035650274,0.0011073378,0.000496421,0.00048117625,0.0021477845,0.000100262994,0.021041606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.907568,0.07571839,0.0030956175,0.00020180881,0.0002671117,0.0000036321617,0.0004161104,0.000045492536,0.012683851],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99469924,0.0012418949,0.0006609905,0.0014497992,0.00057802856,0.001370066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99570495,0.00054577674,0.00090258644,0.001293737,0.00046570445,0.0010872629],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012624933,0.00073371653,0.0009069801,0.00019953257,0.0021173703,0.00026395998,0.0023566657,0.0009044681,0.000073863404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014147225,0.0008625498,0.00021732082,0.00031738897,0.003551161,0.00124882,0.0013485575,0.00089874683,0.000006759833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008188306,0.001949482,0.5221303,0.0034202617,0.0029230402,0.0053452305,0.36217564,0.0040428485,0.0015546496,0.021519104,0.0159071,0.058213495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014767095,0.00014317867,0.64542,0.0011880457,0.001027466,0.00037648616,0.11655106,0.0010240563,0.000058960366,0.003493719,0.22807643,0.0011638906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9282124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9782026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24562459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002001801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018887233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901874934","doi":"10.1111/jomf.12542","title":"Use of Parental Benefits by Family Income in Canada: Two Policy Changes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marriage and the Family","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Multinomial logistic regression; Demographic economics; Socioeconomic status; Context (archaeology); Affect (linguistics); Economic inequality; Inequality; Economics; Public economics; Family income; Psychology; Demography; Economic growth; Geography; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.027326870571218256,"score_gpt":0.2677443644127424,"score_spread":0.24041749384152417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901874934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99293137,0.002837588,0.000009187537,0.0013977054,0.00044405632,0.00011622385,0.00007687634,0.00000289174,0.0021840776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939749,0.0038563812,0.00005694864,0.0015366497,0.00042517026,0.000001260719,0.0000012154109,0.000009052721,0.0001383891],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848926,0.0002756668,0.00036958812,0.00010194074,0.0004714025,0.00029216884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893177,0.00027765258,0.00033499484,0.00012360858,0.0001925435,0.00013945764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093541073,0.00011684046,0.000360459,0.00013031188,0.00018835027,0.00005041561,0.00030855418,0.00005707197,0.0000073388815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016510233,0.00008116244,0.00007197761,0.00033059978,0.00039479628,0.00018567161,0.00006496929,0.00017917974,6.706601e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013785822,0.0002886727,0.82283205,0.00007102538,0.00137475,0.000117472984,0.06761949,0.00016191042,0.0045536384,0.06156852,0.020638937,0.01939497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038976762,0.00028235777,0.91571206,0.00010754583,0.00026178904,0.0000149800935,0.057879742,0.00015911311,0.00006355389,0.0033390315,0.017955128,0.0003270512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8873481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9050914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092879996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002133848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011639594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33097082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902028335","doi":"10.24908/eoe-ese-rse.v19i0.11930","title":"The Rise and Limits of Education Policy. Gendered Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Human capital; Education policy; Economic growth; State (computer science); Education economics; Politics; Economics; Higher education; Development economics; Sociology; Political science; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.015490199385378286,"score_gpt":0.30676369909169743,"score_spread":0.29127349970631916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902028335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9036427,0.010446236,0.000060909748,0.0003864632,0.004272637,0.00020799572,0.000002212218,0.00000788083,0.08097297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879925,0.0017429424,0.00018496573,0.00019798065,0.0004020691,0.000022764187,0.0000032815271,0.0000064881833,0.009446988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906516,0.00032170652,0.00021291137,0.00014921582,0.00012838011,0.0001226434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991815,0.00018097147,0.00019177393,0.00016385464,0.00022464643,0.000057226713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012092589,0.00007490696,0.00009643154,0.00018906198,0.0002228716,0.000014192917,0.00013674652,0.000074297444,0.000018576138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035941947,0.0000702514,0.000020865957,0.00015800969,0.0011671874,0.00017298065,0.00001164505,0.00006679016,0.0000013304059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008021745,0.00040649294,0.014120074,0.000058613525,0.000011460125,1.39348755e-8,0.2958729,6.292362e-7,0.0006638086,0.5818044,0.008653081,0.098328315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019529831,0.00012400332,0.11637113,0.00013884567,0.00003758714,0.0000018493134,0.40566754,0.00002200536,0.00004984706,0.17894682,0.2982348,0.00021025963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021204203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021634586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40285757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048131225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004674732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8292774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902196616","doi":"10.4054/demres.2020.43.28","title":"Explaining the MENA paradox: Rising educational attainment yet stagnant female labor force participation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demographic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Educational attainment; Phenomenon; Closing (real estate); Demographic economics; Economics; Gender gap; Labour economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.13473104100963626,"score_gpt":0.41903304603449665,"score_spread":0.28430200502486036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902196616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9536743,0.0006079011,0.0005360637,0.040621154,0.00020959828,0.0005838599,0.00001577488,0.00006972404,0.0036816022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996993,0.00079657853,0.00029352124,0.000936774,0.00040064642,0.00016069892,0.000019626594,0.000022692011,0.00037643348],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601066,0.0010233828,0.00028008947,0.0003675618,0.0015319074,0.00078640616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978971,0.0010789465,0.000072840376,0.00025814146,0.000373129,0.00031986643],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037063735,0.00011486797,0.00013749527,0.00014620383,0.001687378,0.00025916248,0.0005129215,0.000090833055,0.00008808203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008699426,0.0000903409,0.00007759675,0.002034583,0.00056639785,0.00020139308,0.00010761616,0.00044028895,0.000034950066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048799557,0.00014967022,0.6444407,0.000041420088,0.00006878007,0.0000065592644,0.16121183,0.00027727848,0.00041879882,0.18344735,0.006448813,0.0034400006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005935746,0.00023255497,0.69976103,0.00006229201,0.00003182699,6.9715213e-7,0.21212435,0.008329475,0.0000629212,0.019484866,0.058931142,0.00038529417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007188401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006526345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16396248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009628278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005371304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902197083","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3253481","title":"Can Economic Pressure Overcome Social Norms? The Case of Female Labor Force Participation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Social pressure; Political science; Labour economics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.014984830185249614,"score_gpt":0.2977956472416119,"score_spread":0.2828108170563623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902197083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99523836,0.00040880713,0.00031514675,0.0017079406,0.00038942284,0.00013489656,0.000021261128,0.000022898026,0.001761289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961358,0.00053915725,0.000012860189,0.000115359675,0.0012923076,0.00000476954,0.0000015189673,0.00001627058,0.0018820126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979757,0.00021249085,0.0002478465,0.00012813282,0.0001597196,0.001276078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999369,0.000057971585,0.00022804753,0.00011756504,0.00015858543,0.00006880672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017712358,0.00009681586,0.00014334776,0.000042275053,0.0010346796,0.00006591055,0.00027660117,0.0000974023,0.000044866447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059005622,0.000074910786,0.00008730976,0.00014436826,0.00031588163,0.0001754029,0.000026018653,0.00052766193,0.00000842405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004483374,0.00005699173,0.03864977,0.0000075716994,0.00022215168,0.0000074162554,0.051782057,0.00010820743,0.00010303266,0.9044618,0.00022015338,0.004336018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018925184,0.0008882117,0.081891924,0.000018008057,0.00048816073,0.00038888244,0.3073581,0.0024536944,0.00012298593,0.58916295,0.014681234,0.0006533292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005014586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2235253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31529883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005300381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026381065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79580235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902407228","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3211428","title":"More or Less Unmarried. The Impact of Legal Settings of Cohabitation on Labor Market Outcomes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Labour economics; Economics; Business; Demographic economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012548757917304953,"score_gpt":0.3203991661046573,"score_spread":0.3078504081873523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902407228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99268246,0.00014329572,0.00023243234,0.0020998516,0.00021458998,0.00014643055,0.000024422947,0.000012413143,0.004444091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957903,0.00058598176,0.0000498447,0.00015498693,0.00025221755,0.0000018225633,0.0000017520052,0.000013882924,0.0031492312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770325,0.00027601534,0.00031567807,0.00012393043,0.00049090374,0.0010902411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987152,0.00027770255,0.00036752445,0.00015972438,0.00041055097,0.00006926997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002793807,0.00012964293,0.00022444052,0.00008837535,0.0004331967,0.0000447558,0.0004152471,0.00008818612,0.00007419696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049757527,0.00007398323,0.00017079584,0.00040181275,0.00042495556,0.00017356695,0.000020046913,0.000622189,0.000002917032],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007645901,0.00027121496,0.5894023,0.00001932658,0.0007341556,0.0000029311946,0.037313048,0.000122702,0.0005330738,0.35854855,0.0034815304,0.008806568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012015809,0.001931098,0.7275578,0.000052311112,0.00009281717,0.000025868707,0.21232738,0.00033735394,0.00006287521,0.055248845,0.0008944707,0.00026763385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025228236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009703191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3032997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005689628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042398665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7521341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902525722","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2017-064","title":"Can “Self-Financing” Redeem the Basic Income Guarantee? Disincentives, Efficiency Cost, Tax Burdens, and Attitudes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Public economics; Economics; Work (physics); Incentive; Finance; Earnings; Poverty; Income tax; Poverty trap; Business; Labour economics; Economic growth; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.01725285502479722,"score_gpt":0.27348976442708856,"score_spread":0.2562369094022913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902525722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89983827,0.0005823791,0.000026248928,0.045535672,0.0006697728,0.0005766,0.00030393954,0.000108262204,0.05235888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99222267,0.00043441454,0.000050633877,0.0031341983,0.0012762847,0.000022148346,0.000011619715,0.000023481192,0.0028245354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975096,0.00021781055,0.00023387479,0.00040688214,0.00034736027,0.0012844836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982925,0.00009171202,0.00009920734,0.00045865585,0.0002597239,0.00079818704],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008337838,0.00021030036,0.00020679076,0.000390184,0.002503291,0.00049797946,0.00078135525,0.00016575446,0.000048894737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065331266,0.00017826354,0.000058841157,0.0013409968,0.0014364519,0.00023042074,0.000081951024,0.00021874397,0.000041405066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025748398,0.00004011212,0.15381244,0.000015994347,0.000045430406,0.000016264421,0.031890612,6.920182e-7,0.000009141835,0.79631555,0.01024909,0.0076021156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027384594,0.000046894504,0.5154228,0.00002205961,0.000015609623,0.000007731568,0.004783222,0.00010891543,0.0000012650023,0.003560577,0.4754388,0.0003182698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74691826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95534027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79275495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011429469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00835291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99879533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903384437","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2018.11.008","title":"Work-family policy and female entrepreneurship: Evidence from China's subsidized child care program","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"China Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Fogarty International Center; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Ministry of Health, British Columbia","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Subsidy; China; Work (physics); Child care; Economic growth; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Business; Economics; Political science; Nursing; Market economy; Medicine; Finance","score_opus":0.031928713194097874,"score_gpt":0.3225747982861258,"score_spread":0.29064608509202794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903384437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7684547,0.20724402,0.0000057844563,0.0015433168,0.0005164158,0.0010896057,0.000031738196,0.00013606467,0.020978387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71782845,0.27950358,0.00039246771,0.00063600246,0.0012312267,0.00007389561,0.000023782239,0.00002513191,0.00028547182],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977695,0.00035533725,0.00048073148,0.0006814247,0.0001552887,0.0005577488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986368,0.00011436357,0.00026141317,0.000618312,0.000058679198,0.0003104216],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006726615,0.00029043824,0.00060512486,0.00006643278,0.0005969469,0.00021185882,0.0006010496,0.00013774927,0.00023853205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003725299,0.00027291712,0.00018056291,0.00029607292,0.00051353214,0.00027782551,0.00014386752,0.00020394403,0.00029956127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000422081,0.00011091067,0.6487774,0.0011787325,0.0001252906,0.000008495413,0.055915248,0.0000053651534,0.000011974233,0.0046647824,0.0027518566,0.28640774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000368193,0.000094059425,0.89208955,0.0035228354,0.00012397111,0.0000024095032,0.001481326,0.000019759189,0.0000064274827,0.0007072216,0.10107614,0.00050813134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006740507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021268711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2858996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028253457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039472003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903657392","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2018-043","title":"Is Canada Ready for Real Poverty Reduction through a Universal Guaranteed Basic Income? A Rejoinder to Kesselman’s “Can ‘Self-Financing’ Redeem the Basic Income Guarantee? Disincentives, Efficiency Costs, Tax Burdens, and Attitudes”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Basic income; Poverty; Economics; Public economics; Poverty reduction; Basic needs; Decile; Tax credit; Income tax; Economic growth","score_opus":0.019566879677710522,"score_gpt":0.27669408677036283,"score_spread":0.2571272070926523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903657392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89638877,0.00020570516,0.00013381953,0.07200096,0.0015345201,0.0018547832,0.0019010662,0.00013370761,0.025846668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98805726,0.00032818347,0.00021027602,0.0073968065,0.0012006328,0.000053474432,0.000050002283,0.00005295497,0.00265039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961254,0.00027561167,0.00044634508,0.0008226462,0.0006268371,0.0017031472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740475,0.00013643733,0.00021917587,0.00072809274,0.00064285414,0.0008686693],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008685924,0.00039253428,0.00041289092,0.00046014605,0.0028779095,0.00040075646,0.0009406482,0.0002709445,0.000034421195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005495284,0.00036011502,0.000094467876,0.0020240347,0.00074746495,0.00043861088,0.00010971742,0.00030286945,0.000009056746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009668411,0.00012187902,0.05407312,0.00009171851,0.00026320486,0.000037678154,0.103592224,0.0000048155816,0.00008184914,0.66001993,0.1780318,0.0035850727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001478198,0.00028918844,0.22079827,0.00012425407,0.00009313311,0.000038279686,0.038575042,0.00030841344,0.000013024152,0.0023309065,0.7349187,0.0010325406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65768903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068754177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024176072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904911200","doi":"10.1080/10875549.2018.1550132","title":"First Birth before First Stable Employment and Subsequent Single-Mother “Disconnection” before and after the Welfare Reform and Great Recession","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Disconnection; Single mothers; Welfare reform; Recession; Welfare; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Economics; Food stamps; Labour economics; Psychology; Political science; Geography; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.014568594646593287,"score_gpt":0.2535100237917659,"score_spread":0.2389414291451726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904911200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867468,0.00051114894,0.000074261196,0.010140033,0.00044126454,0.00013597158,0.000021176236,0.000010648187,0.0019186839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967024,0.0005185406,0.00016823137,0.00041796773,0.00047015623,0.0000027300412,9.210987e-7,0.000014610573,0.0017044516],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893844,0.000056457528,0.00026436037,0.00015607943,0.00033325344,0.00025138565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933916,0.000021317126,0.0002130236,0.00011753805,0.00016567405,0.00014326345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051145,0.00013414894,0.00017614692,0.00006275647,0.0009941739,0.00017820686,0.00011272668,0.00010197299,0.00009663824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003554437,0.00007278276,0.000045002496,0.00012960746,0.00033647064,0.0004014321,0.00006768401,0.00014393951,9.0595756e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022313443,0.00010208734,0.95356387,0.00006500945,0.00007693083,0.00001810437,0.03729548,0.0000045878874,0.000028010038,0.0020388758,0.0015412056,0.0050427294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006075451,0.0006627692,0.827108,0.0001401975,0.000049690312,0.000057535875,0.013804078,0.0001239561,0.000010981669,0.0025741989,0.15471621,0.00014477738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029047816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11692517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15317501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024202968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052956366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89918864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906200385","doi":"","title":"Essays on Gender and the Macroeconomy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.03644541286981632,"score_gpt":0.2930866861368607,"score_spread":0.25664127326704433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906200385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3177048,0.00010202425,0.00039175546,0.0004816251,0.00028029963,0.0007570272,0.00029042113,0.000046181576,0.6799459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79106957,0.010575258,0.0023486372,0.000092849514,0.0004087113,0.0000011160516,0.00066826685,0.000060590253,0.194775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959526,0.0015114737,0.00012821062,0.0006694537,0.0009985131,0.0007397679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736786,0.0009066376,0.00021817438,0.00052114675,0.00063583424,0.00035034108],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019095335,0.00025511894,0.00045117072,0.00076084567,0.0035781318,0.00007386777,0.0015427553,0.00033388875,0.0007080264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001589605,0.0002808809,0.00024791944,0.0006415627,0.00457317,0.00027217536,0.00037236704,0.0010040489,0.0001470106],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035311012,0.00022777951,0.004349434,0.00024776763,0.0005774022,0.00017778907,0.2768045,0.0000064564065,0.00007770544,0.67829126,0.029649626,0.006059156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025432666,0.00018527103,0.02922734,0.00010118943,0.00013105909,0.0000011797904,0.6308283,0.00025717804,0.0000030400308,0.02380901,0.3125092,0.00040396219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012535643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035154223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65448225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029376426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001027458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907409907","doi":"10.1093/wbro/lkz005","title":"What Explains Uneven Female Labor Force Participation Levels and Trends in Developing Countries?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The World Bank Research Observer","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":272,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Zinc Association; Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation","keywords":"Feminization (sociology); Latin Americans; Economics; Shock (circulatory); Fertility; Demographic economics; Sex segregation; Developing country; Socioeconomic status; Labour economics; Development economics; Political science; Economic growth; Population; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.1620433601857993,"score_gpt":0.4181338667332136,"score_spread":0.25609050654741433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907409907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98098147,0.0005040328,0.00001242859,0.013690284,0.0003408571,0.00038071422,0.000008962551,0.00004349489,0.0040377434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95071864,0.0010112018,0.00009303141,0.0005948672,0.00010560511,0.000050476952,0.000008837477,0.000021225567,0.047396135],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704903,0.00079999515,0.00023060718,0.00030536743,0.0008242737,0.00079069927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857605,0.0006978966,0.000050898583,0.00031717314,0.00025112694,0.000106839725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004281813,0.00011768087,0.00017528991,0.00028681435,0.0005144516,0.00041847583,0.00042384217,0.00007956608,0.00026910604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015380462,0.00009326596,0.000031813423,0.0019794158,0.00034690087,0.00089328806,0.00017243145,0.0003197233,0.00007140071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007135264,0.000058287795,0.596822,0.00006120984,0.000033182114,0.000009729678,0.085453376,0.00017349249,0.000112133486,0.31073537,0.0015898768,0.004879959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042280837,0.000025929845,0.9019279,0.0000976813,0.000004369313,1.5681586e-7,0.019446177,0.00044713143,0.00004691759,0.002730808,0.07468613,0.0001639896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00155869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.088251606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30800456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029987225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026797998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92838544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908388078","doi":"","title":"État des lieux sur les écarts de revenus entre les parents et les femmes et hommes sans enfant au Québec et dans le reste du Canada","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04636896854772139,"score_gpt":0.3145262334317922,"score_spread":0.2681572648840708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908388078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9385726,0.0026189778,0.000028083745,0.009395476,0.000927454,0.00075640425,0.0008301909,0.000056491896,0.04681436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8967956,0.09156272,0.00059508183,0.00034884864,0.00045239076,0.00014924367,0.00018448148,0.00012339525,0.009788264],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99020797,0.0041418783,0.001114545,0.0015315375,0.000795872,0.0022082042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945634,0.0026613574,0.00047218698,0.0011074747,0.00047677357,0.0007187823],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062866304,0.0007675334,0.0010098737,0.00028584298,0.002114293,0.0004412085,0.0018603314,0.00095682405,0.00007783194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002241569,0.0008610985,0.00034685803,0.0003163846,0.003200439,0.0003393083,0.0012852137,0.0022600936,0.000007623403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007781641,0.00030424166,0.85472244,0.00028708956,0.00024603526,0.00013052936,0.06541676,0.0070539094,0.00006457479,0.0100978,0.0006600768,0.0609387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007957048,0.00015229768,0.6199454,0.00086998305,0.000047557874,0.000027215465,0.1793889,0.0015532506,0.00005783254,0.0025022526,0.19351925,0.0011403785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98922336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99963117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23477708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008211437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03469457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909802873","doi":"","title":"DCF Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF) Claimed Funds By Program, Provider and Calendar Quarter","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reimbursement; Quarter (Canadian coin); Audit; Business; Government (linguistics); Actuarial science; Accounting; Economics; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.017083291692734832,"score_gpt":0.29638012387880164,"score_spread":0.2792968321860668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909802873","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022114022,0.0007860366,0.00003786914,0.0016239414,0.0016458278,0.0019644557,0.9891295,0.00028108593,0.0023198857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00044782614,0.0026252086,0.0010578203,0.004169448,0.0011944127,0.00033301543,0.98110163,0.000059877762,0.009010779],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963815,0.00034896136,0.0005514851,0.0009343986,0.0008614235,0.00092219806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810463,0.00013702421,0.00018479211,0.0006937749,0.0002355683,0.0006442191],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008687391,0.0005452168,0.0005894649,0.0002407596,0.0006984505,0.00061177,0.0007604573,0.00087126135,0.00034602828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011694044,0.00047469503,0.000118781616,0.0005661066,0.000855692,0.0006056954,0.00022081843,0.00045767013,0.00019644541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021186239,0.0001654769,0.0010787247,0.000106969186,0.00006305373,0.000008177826,0.002966107,6.47825e-8,0.000003387538,0.000045850273,0.9931467,0.002394312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002946094,0.0003802383,0.00027672425,0.000054502027,0.000063186475,0.0000014507089,0.038380265,0.000008195003,0.0000010802958,0.00014935108,0.95974255,0.0006478246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020403437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033117477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03541416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013098295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006226097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909938830","doi":"10.1108/ijm-11-2017-0298","title":"Can pay gaps between gay men and lesbians shed light on male–female pay gaps?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Manpower","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Gender pay gap; Lesbian; Gender gap; Originality; Wage; Demographic economics; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Gender discrimination; Social psychology; Gender studies; Labour economics; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01674220929390084,"score_gpt":0.2963823042905914,"score_spread":0.27964009499669057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909938830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88129914,0.00010640364,0.00011792777,0.012464064,0.0023381012,0.00013027473,0.000043672397,0.000014507321,0.10348589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976978,0.00042150894,0.00016397575,0.0006177537,0.0010854453,0.0000012032236,0.000007211603,0.000016733764,0.020708151],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997998,0.0001302637,0.00040086973,0.00019093344,0.0010115737,0.00026834247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876875,0.00015405123,0.00031363525,0.00012643977,0.0004451802,0.00019197608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000763651,0.00014607323,0.00024204761,0.00020616739,0.00011393925,0.00016701753,0.00057360955,0.00012231075,0.0007527274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000099019424,0.000098029814,0.00012466348,0.00010148746,0.00009292521,0.00024916223,0.00006152819,0.0003418123,0.00008258516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000940912,0.00013676702,0.9599775,0.000010531903,0.00033864722,0.000132034,0.017829131,0.000063899,0.0005222917,0.0077933627,0.010485212,0.002616509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018778909,0.00034891834,0.736025,0.00020978301,0.000069950125,0.0000752667,0.014565976,0.000051235795,0.00020238725,0.0042406446,0.24190351,0.00042947367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030044655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030728517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2314183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020492832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020135414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8241837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911459977","doi":"10.29173/cjfy29453","title":"Book Review of: Scott, Laura S. (2009). Two is Enough: A Couple’s Guide to Living Childless by Choice. Berkeley: Seal Press.","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Family and Youth / Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la Jeunesse","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Seal (emblem); Art history; Gerontology; Art; Visual arts; Medicine","score_opus":0.012102843970915723,"score_gpt":0.2709017322928866,"score_spread":0.2587988883219709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911459977","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43485326,0.5426488,0.00014922544,0.008110382,0.0020736349,0.00042832116,0.0011359056,0.000007760205,0.010592695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49548593,0.41145346,0.0007524115,0.07802159,0.0016351994,0.000007788226,0.000019905392,0.0001789995,0.012444718],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931666,0.0016504783,0.0017322261,0.00048443442,0.0009277296,0.002038495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910851,0.00077997247,0.0013716217,0.00041325568,0.0013628735,0.00498718],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063250167,0.00064323365,0.0013897987,0.0005573839,0.0008788436,0.0004964845,0.0012673391,0.00052296824,0.00037580554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012744765,0.00067187345,0.00047253596,0.0008948541,0.00062983914,0.0009791764,0.00007949862,0.0019489957,0.000011524876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006666988,0.00017859206,0.09941338,0.0018830826,0.00076691346,0.0012218275,0.11882586,0.0011391276,0.00014378002,0.004924162,0.76823986,0.003196767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015788589,0.00054296106,0.036724906,0.012641145,0.00053426245,0.0020003056,0.043594103,0.000165383,0.000011318617,0.0001673515,0.90110815,0.0009312641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49621314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32437497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17183818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018371558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017168954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912252502","doi":"10.29173/cjfy29437","title":"Book Review of: Scott, Laura S. (2009). Two is Enough: A Couple’s Guide to Living Childless by Choice. Berkeley: Seal Press.","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Family and Youth / Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la Jeunesse","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Seal (emblem); Art history; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.012102843970915723,"score_gpt":0.2709017322928866,"score_spread":0.2587988883219709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912252502","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43485326,0.5426488,0.00014922544,0.008110382,0.0020736349,0.00042832116,0.0011359056,0.000007760205,0.010592695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49548593,0.41145346,0.0007524115,0.07802159,0.0016351994,0.000007788226,0.000019905392,0.0001789995,0.012444718],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931666,0.0016504783,0.0017322261,0.00048443442,0.0009277296,0.002038495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910851,0.00077997247,0.0013716217,0.00041325568,0.0013628735,0.00498718],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063250167,0.00064323365,0.0013897987,0.0005573839,0.0008788436,0.0004964845,0.0012673391,0.00052296824,0.00037580554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012744765,0.00067187345,0.00047253596,0.0008948541,0.00062983914,0.0009791764,0.00007949862,0.0019489957,0.000011524876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006666988,0.00017859206,0.09941338,0.0018830826,0.00076691346,0.0012218275,0.11882586,0.0011391276,0.00014378002,0.004924162,0.76823986,0.003196767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015788589,0.00054296106,0.036724906,0.012641145,0.00053426245,0.0020003056,0.043594103,0.000165383,0.000011318617,0.0001673515,0.90110815,0.0009312641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49621314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32437497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17183818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018371558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017168954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913222727","doi":"10.1080/00220388.2020.1790533","title":"What Drives Female Labour Force Participation? Comparable Micro-level Evidence from Eight Developing and Emerging Economies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Development Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development, UK Government; International Development Research Centre; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation","keywords":"Emerging markets; Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.14258095856238134,"score_gpt":0.3533964882710734,"score_spread":0.21081552970869205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913222727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9635889,0.020159032,0.0017519665,0.013789267,0.0005318435,0.00011571031,0.0000022890097,0.000011998911,0.000048997823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93626285,0.050222993,0.011990062,0.0009636642,0.0001921125,0.000004040793,6.457645e-7,0.000008261671,0.00035539802],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985793,0.00019696604,0.0005230737,0.0001348998,0.000287443,0.00027826685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845165,0.00066971494,0.0003838954,0.00006594102,0.00032474985,0.00010406672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010147233,0.00014696951,0.00034604876,0.00004592661,0.0011247116,0.00015727304,0.00030736104,0.000034071232,0.000014792549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035400415,0.000105029634,0.000035353776,0.00018587317,0.00023393844,0.00089006603,0.0001639913,0.00013768088,0.000009018498],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004270844,0.0000140063985,0.23147134,0.00004610156,0.00048697944,0.0000040330756,0.7646024,0.00028852827,0.0004876172,0.0005325228,0.00058879907,0.001434954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000345251,0.00003604403,0.49287677,0.0005226874,0.00008784562,0.0000016855541,0.4972104,0.000060152925,0.0015474481,0.0016418558,0.005416863,0.00025298016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050520095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069654954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26739198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013066655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038296287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86504865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913299972","doi":"","title":"Gender Equality and Taxation: The Question of the Childcare Expenses Deduction (Égalité des genres : fiscalité et ‘garde d’enfants’ s’accordent-elles au féminin ?)","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Presumption; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Economics; Political science; Tax deduction; Welfare economics; Tax reform; Public economics; Law; State income tax; Gross income","score_opus":0.02936432652040478,"score_gpt":0.3198502235560697,"score_spread":0.2904858970356649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913299972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9652729,0.019183708,0.004094208,0.0065802652,0.0020340986,0.00028957176,0.000025220521,0.000019679957,0.002500345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973746,0.020753961,0.00012999268,0.00024894057,0.0017994336,0.0000072245753,0.0000046403125,0.000024437353,0.0032853729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945345,0.0022476062,0.0005614844,0.0003256477,0.0006972027,0.0016335567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811715,0.0001805817,0.00083325186,0.0003118805,0.0004391346,0.00011802604],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005364385,0.00027117706,0.00026406455,0.00006266243,0.0021978656,0.00015874467,0.0005212664,0.00023678709,0.00005649961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044990145,0.00018155697,0.00019781974,0.0003739087,0.0021309876,0.00040415657,0.0001160537,0.0011408963,0.0000072527987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005493042,0.00010736784,0.22277185,0.000037613027,0.0002546272,4.111188e-7,0.1010551,0.00006216254,0.00018995162,0.6511345,0.00011315954,0.024218325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000399967,0.0002570682,0.4525152,0.000104327635,0.0001911107,0.00019105071,0.2428576,0.000117236836,0.000110065404,0.30056313,0.0024396454,0.00025356113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007513311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08711488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35057136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009383093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032260627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913456727","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.49.2.203","title":"Men’s and Women’s Marriage and Cohabitation Earnings Gaps in Comparative Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Earnings; Context (archaeology); Demographic economics; Economics; Perspective (graphical); Scarcity; Matching (statistics); Labour economics; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.0643673780994849,"score_gpt":0.38054902253582684,"score_spread":0.31618164443634195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913456727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97263736,0.0063734516,0.00009107263,0.00044985366,0.00030310205,0.0002128652,0.000005635224,0.00001019057,0.0199165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995778,0.0028950921,0.0005851817,0.0001652635,0.00025652337,0.000012416076,3.0013481e-7,0.000005867351,0.00030131],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810666,0.00053662044,0.00043635536,0.00021050105,0.00039448115,0.0003153556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733686,0.0005735174,0.00043369178,0.00006139224,0.0014598771,0.0001346571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012536698,0.00018947896,0.00068177906,0.00024788213,0.0005336656,0.00007785757,0.00012637321,0.000060979884,0.000007413255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022596974,0.0001588586,0.000041378913,0.00034339502,0.0015667063,0.00044494553,0.00006697842,0.0002764206,0.0000045017773],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015430423,0.00006353796,0.1008141,0.00001087284,0.00023643702,0.000007357954,0.88600236,0.000014749251,0.0003134785,0.010126711,0.0022213699,0.000034733002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006051475,0.00041392774,0.42354795,0.000042701806,0.00001737886,0.0000022202717,0.5679431,0.000055142234,0.000009924853,0.0060311644,0.0012283255,0.000103030565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021871761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011111668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32273385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005535887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015628264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6478066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913644440","doi":"10.29173/cjfy29431","title":"Book Review of: Scott, Laura S. (2009). Two is Enough: A Couple’s Guide to Living Childless by Choice. Berkeley: Seal Press.","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Family and Youth / Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la Jeunesse","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Seal (emblem); Gerontology; Art history; Sociology; History; Medicine; Archaeology","score_opus":0.012102843970915723,"score_gpt":0.2709017322928866,"score_spread":0.2587988883219709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913644440","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43485326,0.5426488,0.00014922544,0.008110382,0.0020736349,0.00042832116,0.0011359056,0.000007760205,0.010592695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49548593,0.41145346,0.0007524115,0.07802159,0.0016351994,0.000007788226,0.000019905392,0.0001789995,0.012444718],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931666,0.0016504783,0.0017322261,0.00048443442,0.0009277296,0.002038495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910851,0.00077997247,0.0013716217,0.00041325568,0.0013628735,0.00498718],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063250167,0.00064323365,0.0013897987,0.0005573839,0.0008788436,0.0004964845,0.0012673391,0.00052296824,0.00037580554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012744765,0.00067187345,0.00047253596,0.0008948541,0.00062983914,0.0009791764,0.00007949862,0.0019489957,0.000011524876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006666988,0.00017859206,0.09941338,0.0018830826,0.00076691346,0.0012218275,0.11882586,0.0011391276,0.00014378002,0.004924162,0.76823986,0.003196767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015788589,0.00054296106,0.036724906,0.012641145,0.00053426245,0.0020003056,0.043594103,0.000165383,0.000011318617,0.0001673515,0.90110815,0.0009312641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49621314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32437497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17183818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018371558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017168954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914382174","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.47.4.441","title":"Gender and Cultural Identity Work of Unmarried Indian Breadwinner Daughters in South Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Negotiation; Identity (music); Power (physics); Sociology; Identity negotiation; Social science","score_opus":0.11547251347579758,"score_gpt":0.36304172996944073,"score_spread":0.24756921649364316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914382174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99049646,0.005499085,0.00016336689,0.00019891709,0.000457527,0.0001116213,0.000013140316,0.000005708373,0.0030541967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978357,0.0013959262,0.0003707228,0.000059502403,0.00010571846,0.0000022236832,2.0041992e-7,0.0000049413893,0.00022508248],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982663,0.0003131597,0.0005232187,0.00014017406,0.00048078885,0.0002763953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844766,0.00029351967,0.00046903317,0.00008146368,0.00060152495,0.00010682461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007763551,0.00015264364,0.0005663967,0.00018722069,0.00020272372,0.00003788232,0.00022683755,0.0000644606,0.0000047655267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015331592,0.00009194161,0.000096317504,0.00048168228,0.00081901095,0.0005892616,0.00007400378,0.00015003937,0.0000029667958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008756902,0.000055165743,0.41380063,0.000013895366,0.00029114683,0.000013377747,0.5796249,0.00001544256,0.00041799108,0.0039221128,0.0016385632,0.00011923394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006480574,0.000056640773,0.5967343,0.00009866019,0.000031077405,8.978978e-7,0.39824632,6.5380675e-7,0.000012807565,0.0033896763,0.00067301246,0.00010794413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033909375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032924002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18293363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013275354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013104561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.374927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914538807","doi":"10.1111/fare.12351","title":"Use It or Lose It? Predicting Learning Transfer of Relationship and Marriage Education Among Child Welfare Professionals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Relations","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Psychology; Low Confidence; Structural equation modeling; Sample (material); Self-efficacy; Medical education; Transfer of learning; Developmental psychology; Transfer of training; Social psychology; Medicine; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.03259530524194708,"score_gpt":0.30102851490913896,"score_spread":0.26843320966719186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914538807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93555033,0.00011409192,0.00042239024,0.0021522462,0.00051125826,0.00067822705,0.00003138407,0.00007020009,0.060469843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735137,0.000104589824,0.0004812106,0.0001617255,0.000092350085,0.000031693427,0.00008964124,0.000021401649,0.025503667],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983867,0.00035182416,0.0003923435,0.00026937106,0.00036143255,0.00023833955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876064,0.0005938097,0.00012611866,0.00018501178,0.00021469487,0.00011974625],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006003944,0.00013004002,0.00017427564,0.00016698975,0.0013114874,0.0000701101,0.00012442871,0.00025231208,0.00021767335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078314025,0.00012225084,0.00006214351,0.00053101906,0.0001503338,0.00076585496,0.000028729371,0.00043478367,0.000029060764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104666005,0.000076942815,0.93901837,0.000027738988,0.000018759452,2.75163e-7,0.026159458,0.00056070864,0.000025251898,0.033605568,0.00030147645,0.00019499598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022663016,0.000031042888,0.9119618,0.00020499773,0.00004515755,6.281642e-7,0.07802771,0.000859906,8.98366e-7,0.000340847,0.008159323,0.00014104035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081808737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013956215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051868256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007042084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003362184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914873285","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.043","title":"Unconditional cash transfers and parental obesity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Body mass index; Overweight; Obesity; Cash transfers; Child obesity; Medicine; Demography; Cash; Childhood obesity; Gerontology; Economics; Sociology; Finance; Endocrinology","score_opus":0.01709956414827965,"score_gpt":0.301641606571993,"score_spread":0.2845420424237134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914873285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92680246,0.00006211822,0.00005082734,0.0020347799,0.00089971797,0.00019828265,0.000020687667,0.00004176706,0.06988937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806404,0.000088996654,0.00001568532,0.00066278083,0.0005355355,0.000003297944,0.000012269104,0.0000044434337,0.00061297824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805903,0.00006352507,0.0001401512,0.00030256915,0.0010026923,0.00043203196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994714,0.0000580975,0.000040546693,0.00007393361,0.00012614664,0.00022987524],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012658985,0.000096216245,0.00016717278,0.00008057811,0.0012499433,0.00004161022,0.00028534836,0.000078338744,0.0004259788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010281417,0.00008387429,0.000031952717,0.00069833035,0.0034815683,0.00030979884,0.00002368068,0.00013146558,0.000023655817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006079393,0.00004009471,0.6922692,0.000011418122,0.00000597267,0.000005545048,0.12680288,8.807343e-7,0.0012007273,0.17559795,0.0010298793,0.0030293723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006631276,0.00010390427,0.9037502,0.000018793791,0.000019534797,0.000002594497,0.08185886,0.00005827449,0.000009362638,0.007909978,0.005413204,0.00019216035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026165708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012349103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21148102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018101314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047839418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915518988","doi":"10.32920/27616584","title":"Equality Delayed is Equality Denied for Indigenous Women","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Gender equality; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.054281854722878685,"score_gpt":0.34517034692935206,"score_spread":0.2908884922064734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915518988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.845998,0.009319414,0.06503483,0.0054838965,0.007904825,0.0011739136,0.001272288,0.00040970478,0.06340311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79899424,0.00091186643,0.0017899718,0.0030618943,0.000906708,0.00011626072,0.00004122402,0.00004454296,0.19413328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607956,0.00044868284,0.0006500557,0.00074122834,0.00060989877,0.0014705965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982246,0.0005856936,0.00009862265,0.00040154424,0.00023393653,0.00045559174],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00335393,0.00033554286,0.00043761867,0.00009069949,0.000785574,0.00043906865,0.0005135483,0.0005422844,0.0016981126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009975436,0.00033381055,0.00030745027,0.0009673233,0.0004917687,0.00040013262,0.00010859025,0.00030368194,0.00051783497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044376597,0.00025918693,0.0024913303,0.00056039495,0.0004045081,0.000008739412,0.47959837,0.000015452504,0.000074987016,0.4841045,0.0065715592,0.025866576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006083111,0.00039227935,0.004092585,0.000058016045,0.00019062811,0.0000033389103,0.139317,0.005850561,0.000047678754,0.23238812,0.61608464,0.00096681516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016302926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006675932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6095131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011180752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012650584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918966047","doi":"","title":"The Effect of Housing Price Changes on Fertility: Evidence from Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Renting; Economics; Real estate; Demographic economics; Rental housing; Substitution effect; Labour economics; Population; Demography; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.04291053870237019,"score_gpt":0.33053935101227594,"score_spread":0.2876288123099058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918966047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634648,0.0005719057,0.0000022780066,0.0017530724,0.0011332075,0.00082025083,0.00011887621,0.00001940851,0.032116223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97945833,0.019209882,0.000026742351,0.00005311183,0.0003034654,0.000096566946,0.0000065978875,0.000029602139,0.0008157212],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958366,0.0015149289,0.00039851575,0.0007018824,0.00068666646,0.00086141063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898852,0.008525743,0.00024056775,0.0009980506,0.00015979855,0.00019063872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051661828,0.00024117163,0.00046114085,0.00012602443,0.0006105678,0.00014912117,0.0013068663,0.00034481948,0.000017875293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035464438,0.00017604562,0.00009843139,0.00013855056,0.0007085311,0.00005127128,0.0006698252,0.00095655787,0.000002078669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007197055,0.00005502015,0.4956872,0.00030906918,0.00025938646,0.000033084594,0.008214567,0.0014989047,0.00030586455,0.00056234666,0.00019463315,0.49216023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017369759,0.0009580872,0.8765992,0.0058787777,0.00008297963,6.670238e-7,0.026007118,0.0051078093,0.0018498476,0.010150515,0.06955358,0.0020744745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.532201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9368498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49008575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002771151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003435155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72464633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919154417","doi":"10.3368/jhr.59.1.0419-10155r3","title":"Socialized Healthcare and Women’s Fertility Decisions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Human Resources","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Schools of economic thought; Health care; Sociology; Management; Library science; Public relations; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04887883157837994,"score_gpt":0.34041707834276785,"score_spread":0.2915382467643879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919154417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907493,0.0028971944,0.000026694368,0.0040995884,0.00016292336,0.000050699655,0.000004477073,0.000010392625,0.00199876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99684685,0.0012990106,0.000070692666,0.00055296154,0.00024199819,8.642469e-7,3.851019e-7,0.000006682057,0.000980568],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799913,0.0008650294,0.00031789448,0.000081436665,0.0004739752,0.00026252322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987288,0.00039613317,0.00022262032,0.00014284112,0.0003241333,0.00018543254],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022831582,0.000075130854,0.00021446116,0.000046353616,0.0014317714,0.00010288355,0.0002913711,0.00006965152,0.00012224476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004227326,0.00005139023,0.00007136288,0.0001750046,0.00034670043,0.00008072685,0.000065990695,0.0002542052,0.0000019519732],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014618777,0.00014821543,0.06288861,0.000022172902,0.000121989644,0.000046767404,0.919261,0.00001295143,0.0010617024,0.009381385,0.0019781275,0.0049309437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005611122,0.00011843945,0.45252883,0.00004712837,0.000042403008,0.000016193993,0.46369737,0.0000048866714,0.000016552849,0.05201054,0.030838475,0.000118051874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039418248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029745214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45556358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012301958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023560283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919810910","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1314","title":"The Disability Tax Credit: Exploring Attitudes, Perceptions, and Beliefs About Disability","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Medical model of disability; Perception; Disability benefits; Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Inclusion (mineral); Psychology; Public economics; Social psychology; Political science; Actuarial science; Economics; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.05433885309137197,"score_gpt":0.3558586436122912,"score_spread":0.3015197905209192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919810910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821756,0.00020121275,0.000022941367,0.011249194,0.0005141026,0.00009240934,0.00002169017,0.0000132900195,0.0057095517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890287,0.0015971032,0.000095204545,0.00042636658,0.008711132,0.0000031900818,5.5035093e-7,0.0000074778945,0.00013029049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857855,0.00028283437,0.00033676848,0.00013177906,0.00035298997,0.000317063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991817,0.00017577466,0.00016337051,0.00010582125,0.00020156664,0.00017180554],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00144311,0.00010544737,0.00020581957,0.000014816595,0.0031555032,0.00022654947,0.00019837868,0.000088288245,0.00001344071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023089808,0.00007648964,0.00010116791,0.0001229062,0.004874895,0.0003820841,0.00006890152,0.00022974875,0.0000018673367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038182086,0.00015113971,0.31082338,0.000027863403,0.000049836275,8.574674e-7,0.11438673,2.2150611e-7,0.000034749755,0.5635241,0.00083095714,0.010131952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027392062,0.000078373276,0.8998473,0.000012538789,0.000022308568,0.000003068312,0.026508506,0.0000031356974,9.4578473e-7,0.024513803,0.048623778,0.000112313486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013343964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022763385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58902395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020560938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018763219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99814224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922100300","doi":"10.25071/1705-1436.119","title":"Affirmative Action Positions for Women on the Canadian Labour Congress Executive: Comments to the Advancing the Equity Agenda Conference","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Just Labour","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Equity (law); Political science; Gender equity; Action (physics); Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0655114031668174,"score_gpt":0.3583675265000882,"score_spread":0.29285612333327077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922100300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87679255,0.000026096277,0.00075180834,0.08143608,0.0013887334,0.0015656999,0.0012213028,0.000053731634,0.036763996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97674125,0.000027458243,0.000058051406,0.010508694,0.00034532382,0.00027366527,0.000017559121,0.000013230711,0.012014792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981641,0.00037170987,0.00017354864,0.00020614841,0.00037282542,0.0007116493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862814,0.00043423247,0.00011422905,0.0002838078,0.00037479567,0.00016482301],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012184355,0.0001493065,0.00013006639,0.000053249198,0.0042498955,0.00037839837,0.0006188362,0.00008956604,0.00011285474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021308025,0.00008747385,0.00005233653,0.00043513929,0.00021561155,0.00014966891,0.00006911931,0.0002466241,0.000041769606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028420038,0.00007319896,0.0017412467,0.000016182987,0.000048614347,0.0000024440299,0.07606447,0.00076397427,0.00012900367,0.86675555,0.053193722,0.0011831855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003077631,0.00007754387,0.11267058,0.000030038715,0.000023747369,8.1825215e-7,0.2645727,0.00030036806,0.000058417216,0.012501232,0.6092212,0.00023559215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21688196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87813675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8542543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009470949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006457165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2924755370","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1345","title":"Issue 2: Tax, Race, and Child Poverty: The Case for Improving the Canada Child Benefit Program","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Racialization; Child poverty; Race (biology); Indigenous; Welfare; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.009685618873354646,"score_gpt":0.2782486917139486,"score_spread":0.268563072840594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2924755370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87750983,0.0007348752,0.000008319428,0.093113154,0.0007216888,0.0007270839,0.00008488643,0.000010915771,0.02708925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872428,0.00017758942,0.000041317042,0.008625517,0.0030911295,0.0000045606716,8.59117e-7,0.000010782264,0.00080542936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990788,0.000072371826,0.00021343546,0.0000940532,0.000236648,0.0003046951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993447,0.00011015807,0.00023263576,0.00007338957,0.00013795329,0.00010112849],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006045582,0.00010109997,0.00019605772,0.000023915845,0.0021530604,0.0002069695,0.00018254446,0.00008742293,0.0000047225576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006202056,0.00005940478,0.00007968967,0.000109581284,0.0002117093,0.00014131788,0.00003949848,0.00024769787,2.8223837e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060540962,0.00008348531,0.0028845991,0.000090893904,0.00016977072,0.00004293816,0.07997347,0.0000087324215,0.000011265278,0.8660332,0.007611438,0.043029685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012988431,0.00024107724,0.013516195,0.000028088642,0.00013374099,0.00037824176,0.078008614,0.00015075279,0.0000039064244,0.006995741,0.89896756,0.0002772074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6472498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7440085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89135617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009475052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005118413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2934111509","doi":"10.3138/9781442678163-012","title":"6. Getting Good Child Care for Families: What Can Canada Learn from Other Countries?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Child care; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.01275121739779153,"score_gpt":0.2030449840721353,"score_spread":0.19029376667434378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2934111509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034520274,0.007021836,0.00009352213,0.000049707607,0.00068397925,0.00061653164,0.0018953301,0.00005245101,0.9892414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0042593805,0.0058990186,0.00026843947,0.0003283097,0.00047154177,9.4386974e-7,0.00016643766,0.00006395826,0.98854196],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984554,0.00004198463,0.00017708034,0.00042629274,0.00051143323,0.00038782612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986879,0.0001236232,0.0003074977,0.0003437556,0.000364076,0.00017309569],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009019758,0.00029002636,0.00044354625,0.000020057088,0.0008430643,0.000073145726,0.0006452373,0.0004336039,0.0002462757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010361389,0.0003760016,0.00016996791,0.0000016623147,0.00031787404,0.00018040896,0.00011057789,0.00018789561,7.701007e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020264703,0.000024232657,0.00084675604,0.000396711,0.0010674922,0.000071220216,0.6376856,0.00009910127,0.000004511121,0.3293379,0.008399154,0.021864723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004099331,0.000024937372,0.000080887905,0.00022970713,0.0001634569,1.5394689e-7,0.09176914,0.00001075471,0.000001927231,0.00019140125,0.9067549,0.00036279575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8983558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014974766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011612292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936090486","doi":"10.1017/dem.2019.1","title":"Female labor force participation and fertility differentials","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Demographic Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Girl; Economics; Total fertility rate; Demographic economics; Distribution (mathematics); Labour economics; Demography; Population; Family planning; Psychology; Sociology; Research methodology; Mathematics; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.02070578570936673,"score_gpt":0.27413552365583405,"score_spread":0.25342973794646734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936090486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974863,0.0003271135,0.00017076763,0.00033890575,0.0007207174,0.00012453376,0.000007060926,0.000014089458,0.00081051653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974196,0.0018096471,0.00028340681,0.00017699393,0.00012818727,0.0000011926084,0.0000010362911,0.000011233423,0.00016869421],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990149,0.000111309775,0.00042817142,0.00012344774,0.00010292468,0.00021922885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990781,0.0001244947,0.0003741808,0.00012123147,0.00014097666,0.00016103804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008531714,0.00008785976,0.00025543183,0.00013159386,0.0001178097,0.00008945887,0.0001573867,0.000108319255,0.000031763855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076467346,0.000083090745,0.0001138356,0.00013847099,0.00011908028,0.00032933208,0.000022587696,0.00013646844,0.0000035140686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026730098,0.0000407033,0.98860735,0.000011772457,0.000044655146,5.046431e-7,0.0031351517,0.000063498555,0.00008351054,0.007189754,0.000014013927,0.00078236393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044338848,0.00008202888,0.98471117,0.000012208247,0.00004321888,0.000001202968,0.004530923,0.00045263264,0.00001741185,0.008385334,0.0012159565,0.00010450187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005396374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006928812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038961493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042884392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011205167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33883423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936614317","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3344637","title":"Fertility Response to Climate Shocks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Agrarian society; Livelihood; Agriculture; Geography; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.010630132116048227,"score_gpt":0.2814981180337791,"score_spread":0.27086798591773087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936614317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866626,0.00036878645,0.0010773889,0.0018545395,0.00062580843,0.00020965726,0.0000045255924,0.000051449595,0.009145218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99124444,0.0009446851,0.00009048843,0.00040974325,0.00014744024,0.0000028520135,0.0000010436534,0.000016223063,0.0071431124],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956459,0.00047799514,0.00023916783,0.00023014797,0.00046882668,0.0029380058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992185,0.00010829175,0.00008031557,0.00022172686,0.00014251168,0.00022860787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007346865,0.0001250517,0.00017165962,0.00010743806,0.0005659876,0.000111929,0.00044380626,0.00011428248,0.00013154135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023167825,0.0001174284,0.000111963025,0.00034357343,0.00005458527,0.00018909106,0.000052497937,0.0010720765,0.00045281593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021827016,0.00020599352,0.68068886,0.000011371821,0.00014916419,0.000009537643,0.024474137,0.00017977343,0.0037592796,0.2753022,0.0002494066,0.01278754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015939103,0.0011056673,0.61503375,0.000036218025,0.000050903298,0.000038940703,0.14024402,0.00021743512,0.000030425204,0.19725126,0.04364087,0.00075660046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034650453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006931488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11576989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001537798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035685347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63304275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938115164","doi":"","title":"Examining Gender Responsive Implementation of National Climate Change Policies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UWSpace (University of Waterloo)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Political science; Environmental planning; Geography; Oceanography; Geology","score_opus":0.05299918448215348,"score_gpt":0.29943794965264914,"score_spread":0.24643876517049565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938115164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926938,0.00007419443,0.0000037762798,0.00020508665,0.0004609564,0.00038533768,0.00030642658,0.00002744639,0.005842965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9330447,0.0009892075,0.00042560376,0.00004318854,0.000098540215,0.0000011291665,0.00087079,0.000021056994,0.06450579],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846345,0.00015952204,0.0001526919,0.00025224284,0.0006616992,0.0003103829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986107,0.00007792873,0.00045347412,0.00013762136,0.00065794843,0.00006233849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044649426,0.00015634397,0.00029738082,0.00040601494,0.00033406704,0.000017746986,0.0003008982,0.00026449314,0.0002035694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021983404,0.00020138342,0.000106909036,0.00028464614,0.00012969678,0.00031813572,0.000049494894,0.00012470086,0.000023122308],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007204373,0.000025625855,0.03236853,0.00019278427,0.000076478645,0.0000022868298,0.95459056,0.000008751269,0.0009814525,0.010707031,0.00027105556,0.0007034271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028281947,0.000047297075,0.27554905,0.000042951327,0.00005157713,1.2004674e-7,0.7234405,0.000014457187,0.000054656262,0.00018228768,0.0001926343,0.00014160828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11318825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16858688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24318051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017096719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037927856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8927171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939836523","doi":"10.7202/1058539ar","title":"Progrès et stagnation","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du Nouvel-Ontario","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University; Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic stagnation; Economics; Keynesian economics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.030820620459083233,"score_gpt":0.2725143892425394,"score_spread":0.24169376878345616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939836523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82577837,0.0005957317,0.0012303718,0.005979321,0.008555771,0.0005526867,0.000033611326,0.00009700145,0.1571771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70247626,0.00042863886,0.0036239892,0.0010043952,0.0023998388,0.000026548947,0.00005513954,0.00003898648,0.28994623],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975641,0.00026408714,0.00043170847,0.0005398715,0.00045368032,0.00074659055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985014,0.000090729205,0.00023018933,0.00037267656,0.00053896103,0.0002660303],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009806764,0.0002938289,0.00033115214,0.00009039511,0.000643887,0.00022240644,0.00043380357,0.0003334436,0.0024558487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010153199,0.00033950276,0.00016438348,0.00053378975,0.00061896787,0.000591779,0.00010653909,0.0004568185,0.0009740185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020579899,0.00037504264,0.39884937,0.00007019398,0.00008364659,0.00002704867,0.42666104,0.00003054825,0.000024717205,0.15825,0.0066818222,0.00892598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003677283,0.0002168316,0.22180347,0.00010038672,0.0000775447,0.0000108069235,0.0073958226,0.00031434864,0.0000051647867,0.0026882314,0.7666369,0.00038272978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6476131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9870584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7599551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002455834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027686686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942525780","doi":"10.1007/s13524-019-00782-6","title":"Advanced School Progression Relative to Age and Early Family Formation in Mexico","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Maryland Population Research Center, University of Maryland; York University","keywords":"Educational attainment; National Survey of Family Growth; Demography; Pregnancy; Medicine; Young adult; Cohort; Birth order; Sexual intercourse; Fertility; Teenage pregnancy; Gerontology; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Population; Family planning; Environmental health; Political science","score_opus":0.011206350450567835,"score_gpt":0.27999509319028587,"score_spread":0.26878874273971803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942525780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9782555,0.00034554035,0.00063122384,0.00018417503,0.00019282408,0.0006785346,0.000004217735,0.00005486649,0.019653132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965083,0.00016887586,0.0028616993,0.00023516921,0.000021666372,0.000028626708,0.0000046227233,0.000008104247,0.00016295396],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990011,0.00010423783,0.00016645883,0.00020237367,0.0002603387,0.000265485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995752,0.000044175962,0.00006002161,0.00011796867,0.00005632555,0.0001462813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025509906,0.00009278079,0.00013036608,0.00028087117,0.00014774044,0.00006281375,0.000116078365,0.00010437772,0.0000056195245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053219628,0.00008798505,0.00004433417,0.0008999074,0.00006521466,0.00063360133,0.00003205814,0.00013857971,0.00003550618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026650823,0.000027902313,0.96314853,0.000010856332,0.0000065149043,0.000005025739,0.0206254,0.000022902232,0.0011573435,0.008208912,0.0001000808,0.006659849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003806196,0.00009439224,0.9798252,0.000057634046,0.0000039427937,1.6156221e-7,0.011164324,0.00006018504,0.000012473082,0.004383463,0.0038824053,0.00013519694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017466195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004348448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019490179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037729187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026492842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35879263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944250461","doi":"10.1111/cars.12242","title":"Social Change and the Gendered Division of Household Labor in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Division (mathematics); Sociology; Labour economics; Social change; Demographic economics; Gender studies; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.07731765735171922,"score_gpt":0.2715236043247636,"score_spread":0.19420594697304436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944250461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9553339,0.028306905,9.701388e-7,0.013544502,0.00040054208,0.00094487175,0.0003678191,0.000009775336,0.0010907046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96942073,0.024151966,0.000029959436,0.0060907607,0.000112691996,0.00006553814,0.000034792592,0.000018427952,0.00007514672],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969802,0.00093121955,0.00053644355,0.00033713685,0.000103292485,0.0011117397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981916,0.0006103339,0.0003327915,0.00029374697,0.00017969489,0.0003918511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027822373,0.00020640573,0.0008794474,0.00010919567,0.00028345516,0.0000057076427,0.00060891913,0.00034453298,0.000061681974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083080906,0.00017830926,0.0001410781,0.00032990062,0.0015891636,0.000068514986,0.000056093002,0.00042451604,0.0000016090447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007006037,0.0000069778525,0.82872385,0.0013155176,0.000054840857,0.000016512033,0.06619931,0.0000044377007,0.000010406972,0.100694664,0.0013894183,0.0015770434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006746759,0.00003093813,0.9094321,0.00045201313,0.00004856163,0.0000017720589,0.07763426,0.000030095503,3.7660666e-7,0.0053887893,0.006056299,0.00025010103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9893753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095305875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027359282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007350747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99827665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944654769","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12198","title":"Halifax Henna: The Art of Manageable Growth*","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Perspectives","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Government (linguistics); Passion; Face (sociological concept); Work (physics); Work–life balance; Business; Management; Public relations; Marketing; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.010935678217872447,"score_gpt":0.25718775094368157,"score_spread":0.24625207272580912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944654769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68068385,0.00040079572,0.00010918456,0.0016813582,0.00037122724,0.00020037885,0.000004587772,0.000056173823,0.31649244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98885655,0.00024853376,0.00024957047,0.00019234598,0.00021235614,0.0000050387466,0.0000015918687,0.000013111476,0.010220927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885386,0.00008823175,0.00014570543,0.00023761211,0.00036695652,0.00030764102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991427,0.0001755368,0.000119131764,0.00025392495,0.00027888507,0.000029804007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007809249,0.000099605124,0.00015283555,0.00006259764,0.00037267045,0.00009692154,0.00041155194,0.000070801216,0.00022544999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023502807,0.00007794722,0.00008798358,0.00040328185,0.0003018252,0.0002952869,0.00006694564,0.00013872341,0.00021692156],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007588671,0.00007207649,0.31740165,0.0000266009,0.000064869986,0.0000011319502,0.12604791,0.000034878904,0.00058377004,0.5516784,0.003955066,0.00012604475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026073944,0.000028252485,0.22074497,0.00002809745,0.00003250758,8.1916136e-7,0.73715156,0.00012885484,0.00005879959,0.013428913,0.02790173,0.00023475084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038583141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008340668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61110365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076777105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000092915456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5832643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944843947","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2018-047","title":"Paid Parental Leave: Leaner Might Be Better","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Parental leave; Investment (military); Survey data collection; Psychology; Cognition; Plan (archaeology); Time-use survey; Demographic economics; Developmental psychology; Business; Economics; Geography; Political science; Engineering; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.021365737259022813,"score_gpt":0.2665621603166178,"score_spread":0.24519642305759498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944843947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6036617,0.00006575454,0.000003837258,0.06298345,0.00075355574,0.00021309716,0.00017183548,0.00006618334,0.33208054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434401,0.000034320372,0.0000383952,0.025007317,0.0011521013,0.000009868811,0.00007517309,0.000025077125,0.030217651],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997899,0.00011627263,0.00017085393,0.0003047025,0.0003222401,0.0011869568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981662,0.000037815083,0.000049202554,0.0003499291,0.00009649371,0.0013003385],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031911716,0.00015930271,0.00016797072,0.0004505956,0.0004940666,0.00027121278,0.00053344184,0.00021083889,0.001230664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015826857,0.00016701114,0.00009167988,0.00070992263,0.00023553843,0.0003591878,0.000034052533,0.00019983653,0.00082191447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010164075,0.000020416275,0.49824902,0.000008670887,0.000033306278,0.000015290796,0.008537116,0.0000011391772,0.000020245438,0.32586306,0.16175681,0.0054939245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018351346,0.000012724714,0.098617256,0.0000032756873,0.0000043551495,0.0000021150852,0.0040061777,0.000025352214,0.0000014368388,0.001139111,0.8957741,0.00023053934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6802489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85581106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7340173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009325027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00609992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946240308","doi":"10.1093/sf/soz053","title":"The Fiscalization of Social Policy: How Taxpayers Trumped Children in the Fight Against Child Poverty","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Forces","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Poverty; Tax policy; Social policy; Public economics; Child poverty; Economics; Working poor; Revenue; Tax credit; Political science; Development economics; Tax reform; Economic growth; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.00863750615023289,"score_gpt":0.258554647439891,"score_spread":0.24991714128965808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946240308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8850983,0.00008399621,0.000017148466,0.036724478,0.00038729943,0.0007389732,0.000073692594,0.000037216694,0.07683893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949328,0.00021971068,0.0000052643813,0.0023789303,0.0009839807,0.000018008519,0.000046167992,0.000013450552,0.0014017021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982518,0.00039421453,0.00019925056,0.0001787096,0.00056326255,0.00041275122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946797,0.000108704524,0.00019849038,0.00012461157,0.00006963759,0.000030571835],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006958205,0.00012987081,0.00019007722,0.00006084744,0.0016474132,0.00014957954,0.00059022225,0.00019239765,0.000016226915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013931256,0.000084224754,0.00016158698,0.0006909005,0.0003236698,0.00017639982,0.00004356222,0.00018487951,0.00000741289],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040586274,0.00009452832,0.13414986,0.000019731819,0.00009385645,4.643067e-7,0.29710174,0.000031797485,0.000073690746,0.5465133,0.0171738,0.004706617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008051107,0.000042206506,0.80867743,0.000012822252,0.000027370645,2.4042885e-7,0.11732358,0.00013663802,0.000013402168,0.010557025,0.062106628,0.00029752334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019083525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005268147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6745276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010293582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020176619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949523545","doi":"10.24908/iqurcp.11726","title":"11. The Gender Wage Gap of Recent University Graduates","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Proxy (statistics); Demographic economics; Position (finance); Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Glass ceiling; Labour economics; Hourly wage; Psychology; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.1992752149906952,"score_gpt":0.38772177498195104,"score_spread":0.18844655999125584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949523545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79075307,0.00008481292,0.0015156444,0.05843873,0.0006672037,0.0011872085,0.000024226236,0.00021924352,0.14710985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989772,0.0060830857,0.00036124568,0.00011485743,0.0004837213,0.000010458166,0.0000061563596,0.000027025142,0.0031414183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954016,0.00046553576,0.00036396438,0.0006264881,0.0019048391,0.0012375679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99323547,0.0004000688,0.00020227343,0.00033485953,0.005465145,0.0003622101],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043828287,0.00024746894,0.00031615968,0.0003747896,0.0019380093,0.0003112378,0.0015882612,0.000234867,0.00018926102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093377795,0.00020423843,0.000107536245,0.0021525095,0.006399988,0.0006033825,0.00045416557,0.000630782,0.000102041195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071256385,0.00012866381,0.03423763,0.00005623555,0.00007347407,0.000006271214,0.07825197,5.9374463e-7,0.0010678609,0.87060153,0.013392089,0.0021124128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091570296,0.0004406945,0.02634349,0.00013048032,0.000064622785,0.0000044330645,0.4124332,0.0006184651,0.0012279478,0.35322025,0.20390736,0.0006933764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050083855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015781715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5173813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038021457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014458846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951482278","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2872262","title":"Fertility Transitions Along the Extensive and Intensive Margins","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Environmental science; Geography; Demography; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.015737417239271797,"score_gpt":0.26978924457924447,"score_spread":0.25405182733997267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951482278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98037934,0.0056989216,0.0048474967,0.006237002,0.00042872495,0.00015473658,0.000005568231,0.000022952212,0.0022252738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938598,0.004370572,0.000034917826,0.00079202827,0.000329393,0.0000037720547,0.0000017673472,0.000010134618,0.00059759367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972406,0.00028035176,0.00016690047,0.000118470016,0.00025467123,0.0019390017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919134,0.00009845067,0.000071994386,0.00011830944,0.00035540783,0.00016448276],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022095956,0.00010817734,0.00012657997,0.000043480864,0.0013131336,0.00007240855,0.00018248071,0.00008081939,0.00002482887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020563841,0.00007789825,0.00008488903,0.00018390233,0.0003301117,0.00030277358,0.000019779682,0.0011399362,0.000011824266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003856073,0.00009847974,0.14419682,0.0000045641973,0.00022103127,0.0000033283152,0.11562117,0.000008879203,0.00018815979,0.7320248,0.00027356343,0.0073206727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002714767,0.000058086982,0.4442796,0.000007840753,0.00007802457,0.00009668041,0.44753754,0.000037574307,0.0000028529705,0.10483778,0.002640365,0.00015216629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010180157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019850599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.627187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004486202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011390597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952776858","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2924703","title":"Immigration and the Rate of Population Mixing: Explorations with a Stylized Model","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Mixing (physics); Immigration; Population; Econometrics; Economics; Demography; Macroeconomics; Political science; Physics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.013413062484071299,"score_gpt":0.2535731243631788,"score_spread":0.24016006187910752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952776858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84158367,0.00031775833,0.1540243,0.0035250382,0.000036376496,0.00012931679,0.0000017146739,0.00001107553,0.0003707224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945579,0.004210565,0.00021730387,0.000038280716,0.0000670298,0.0000058754113,0.0000016911323,0.0000065655095,0.00089475606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885803,0.00021692179,0.00016295587,0.000083385225,0.00017075494,0.00050796056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999523,0.00008336379,0.00015963397,0.00007268766,0.00012624353,0.00003506683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019084716,0.00006193532,0.000100318444,0.00004674442,0.00044576975,0.00003838177,0.00009407853,0.00003878667,0.0000020091566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007397382,0.000031075804,0.000033244723,0.00013719448,0.00015505521,0.00031384928,0.0000069504213,0.0001950562,6.8619556e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011172116,0.000012903541,0.0053260284,9.68054e-7,0.000035187793,8.800809e-8,0.007170529,0.0003118006,0.00033623556,0.9844074,0.0000063328066,0.0022807687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025661716,0.00010767557,0.0040034866,0.000022193562,0.00006357251,0.0000085255615,0.04144446,0.00786546,0.000015689155,0.94369984,0.000085634594,0.00011730332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071587285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023085827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.153807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019375762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008522115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954859800","doi":"10.5089/9781451863529.001.a001","title":"Why Are Women Working So Much More in Canada? An International Perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IMF Working Paper","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Population ageing; Population; Perspective (graphical); Economic growth; Economic policy; Demographic economics; Business","score_opus":0.01659397469567251,"score_gpt":0.2672378702892402,"score_spread":0.25064389559356764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954859800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92464393,0.00018176156,0.000031880045,0.0038132078,0.0012196375,0.00012130104,0.0000063522702,0.00005292482,0.069928996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99559414,0.000038495255,0.00018711945,0.0026463282,0.00080522464,0.0000199451,0.00000866775,0.000019520892,0.0006805296],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982978,0.00010259073,0.00019615947,0.00033285192,0.00052225584,0.0005483359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994672,0.00006836423,0.00009307834,0.00016579428,0.00010149134,0.00010406862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003018157,0.00013839785,0.0001544384,0.00009728081,0.0003747989,0.00018129939,0.000390651,0.00009034477,0.00015524433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005051988,0.00014951381,0.000034834775,0.00041723932,0.0001164181,0.00019749298,0.000045658613,0.00022830599,0.0000035339222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011120573,0.000050582585,0.93859607,0.0000014124718,0.000014260689,0.000043038664,0.043921117,0.00062993146,0.000028880288,0.014681359,0.0007923298,0.0012299174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024504546,0.0000051454786,0.6301295,0.00003983469,0.0000037584507,8.7469806e-7,0.24558868,0.00022587072,0.0000010900301,0.00338269,0.12014749,0.00023003714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92940176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30846655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003371835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087402714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8817231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956002133","doi":"10.1056/nejm-jw.na49422","title":"The Child Is Parent to the Adult Wage-Earner","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal watch","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Wage; Labour economics; Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.013294772027559331,"score_gpt":0.2796027146476844,"score_spread":0.266307942620125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956002133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68146265,0.0002824776,0.00008801276,0.2677077,0.0024662167,0.00025142432,0.000005619447,0.00001862028,0.047717307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95641685,0.0036692615,0.00005588809,0.0065716826,0.0011937737,0.0000042930187,4.8120296e-7,0.000011602678,0.03207618],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984952,0.00017830572,0.00019099937,0.00012324605,0.00060605654,0.00040616197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991883,0.00010336458,0.0000873634,0.0002391335,0.00021202659,0.00016980853],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010912378,0.00008928817,0.00009987373,0.000015538528,0.0019047485,0.00037489613,0.00062017696,0.00006399254,0.00017970958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118200864,0.00004264677,0.00011092187,0.0002291432,0.0000630441,0.00009468769,0.000059206584,0.00041886236,0.0006704022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039377457,0.0000923874,0.20380996,0.0000051114384,0.0001206638,0.000010608537,0.21522546,0.0003683861,0.00004539455,0.027214132,0.5319167,0.021151831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001596384,0.00004137104,0.050388433,0.000016884516,0.000012180532,0.000008886575,0.04639951,0.000099486846,0.000005290017,0.0025389388,0.90021837,0.00011102561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041893852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016794268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36830166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010493027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010790237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2959832078","doi":"10.1002/cl2.151","title":"PROTOCOL: Vocational and business training to increase women's participation in higher skilled occupations in low‐ and middle‐income countries: protocol for a systematic review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Protocol (science); Vocational education; Low and middle income countries; Training (meteorology); Business; Psychology; Economics; Economic growth; Developing country; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.14681856477987792,"score_gpt":0.43014155276041544,"score_spread":0.2833229879805375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2959832078","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000017720761,0.34643894,0.00016828915,0.000050354127,0.00006527176,0.6529826,0.00003609088,0.000024745887,0.00023196754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000014665171,0.38314414,0.00021394831,0.00014933084,0.00007945604,0.6158367,0.000013254196,0.000039779326,0.00052193826],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.98768693,0.004954448,0.0051830686,0.000797906,0.00063224154,0.0007453965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99291587,0.0024976057,0.0029878332,0.0007345851,0.0004900083,0.000374098],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014237471,0.00074457034,0.0069361096,0.00047458493,0.00028158625,0.00022726019,0.00049727916,0.00035638304,0.000058123027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010865734,0.00046726596,0.0002626036,0.0015761441,0.00014265363,0.00032084974,0.00008491768,0.00018453207,0.00007019044],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006730807,0.000063962274,0.00003959527,0.9917592,0.00003874787,0.0000019897009,0.004783213,1.7161177e-7,7.1635435e-9,0.0025813598,0.00003517067,0.00068984914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006226831,0.000032713982,0.000041486852,0.8238257,0.0003021918,0.0000045706215,0.00040338677,0.000006473113,1.0240818e-9,0.00012831979,0.17418368,0.0004487616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005791817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032668724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17414851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010539558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012009052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962471682","doi":"10.1920/wp.ifs.2019.1919","title":"OLS estimation of the intra-household distribution of consumption","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Estimation; Consumption (sociology); Econometrics; Distribution (mathematics); Statistics; Economics; Environmental science; Mathematics; Art; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.04332288169332451,"score_gpt":0.29847943211887074,"score_spread":0.25515655042554625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962471682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94306517,0.00006239676,0.05078024,0.00020349154,0.0012782248,0.00059193006,0.00024610639,0.00004170638,0.0037307106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871,0.0003062598,0.00033760152,0.000025240948,0.000042904085,0.0000068087934,0.00013276906,0.0000066685247,0.00043177095],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988082,0.00016366919,0.00032032278,0.00017325855,0.00039853656,0.00013603218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998984,0.0000857256,0.0003844416,0.00035541377,0.00016180123,0.00002864321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054191775,0.000101398655,0.00020530305,0.00002803653,0.000092311115,0.00002465185,0.00033361692,0.00030363273,0.000033850632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001608193,0.00007816623,0.00011598613,0.00011669428,0.00027963798,0.000057367437,0.00015798889,0.00020259563,0.000006598108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023074625,0.00023584582,0.42576325,0.00093688944,0.00011134368,1.8157894e-7,0.013993515,0.16650675,0.0004737582,0.38563207,0.0025086058,0.0038147005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027360235,0.00002159255,0.95107645,0.00025498646,0.00011753142,2.1541275e-7,0.0028348682,0.026146557,0.0005526619,0.018037261,0.00042390876,0.00026036668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002343515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005211009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5253132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012738026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032801557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35427094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964248859","doi":"10.1017/9781108227407","title":"Tax Credits for the Working Poor: A Call for Reform","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Earnings; Internal revenue; Tax credit; Audit; Revenue; Welfare reform; Work (physics); Welfare; Business; Public economics; Labour economics; Economics; Accounting; Engineering; Economy; Market economy","score_opus":0.0467376458974897,"score_gpt":0.29542957563163186,"score_spread":0.24869192973414217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964248859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012342787,0.0005826535,0.012626425,0.0015360902,0.0041493988,0.0024626704,0.00023421705,0.000095697775,0.9783005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006349636,0.0005083799,0.0016048395,0.0013607187,0.0035758845,0.00018523236,0.00011404371,0.00005453642,0.9919614],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837273,0.00002266849,0.00026585272,0.00036024733,0.00040898102,0.0005695464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836713,0.0007533181,0.00019556879,0.00033841172,0.00025282198,0.00009276568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092590257,0.00023573605,0.00031900423,0.000057267105,0.0007713242,0.00015300758,0.00076274556,0.0005818051,0.00005044326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012166687,0.00015466454,0.0003243352,0.00007533403,0.00016721908,0.00006874956,0.00006907046,0.0002287577,0.000039832423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022041513,0.000011829744,0.00005208724,0.000068179885,0.00009951018,3.2792863e-7,0.0036577422,0.0000065223057,8.486962e-7,0.48529008,0.50571483,0.0050760037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026661312,0.00004885252,0.00004909776,0.00004829279,0.00008886826,2.0809365e-7,0.0044960207,0.00048774955,2.1827844e-7,0.017225489,0.97703254,0.0002560541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013132124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020352412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4713177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006713107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013850062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965094030","doi":"10.1080/00036846.2019.1646873","title":"German income taxation and the timing of marriage","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; German; Quarter (Canadian coin); Gross income; Labour economics; Income tax; Demographic economics; Panel data; International taxation; State income tax; Public economics; Tax reform; Econometrics","score_opus":0.010965554880747208,"score_gpt":0.2376689422283134,"score_spread":0.22670338734756618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965094030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8964813,0.000017685583,0.00008335899,0.00012096447,0.00014829132,0.00021147016,0.0000039251827,0.00001011385,0.10292291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895394,0.00023016866,0.0002423524,0.00016986537,0.00006237938,0.0000064820847,0.0000034629606,0.000006034743,0.00032533982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958706,0.000020767562,0.00013863006,0.000104246494,0.000036554236,0.00011276419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995483,0.00010979901,0.00017391077,0.00012950436,0.000011317267,0.00002715282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048404533,0.00004934765,0.00011860632,0.000022821754,0.00011340588,0.000030312387,0.00012140895,0.000055251945,0.00004510873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009026855,0.000042373456,0.000021908614,0.000040333187,0.00016202567,0.000059991362,0.00003812788,0.000049335442,0.000033867487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016809425,0.000005441787,0.021960512,0.000009833909,0.000014032771,2.3766262e-8,0.0141268,0.00023309382,0.00006323661,0.96231705,0.000023390832,0.0012297528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053055645,0.00003778396,0.6154305,0.000016662,0.00008101655,0.0000011231896,0.067609474,0.017023336,0.00016418952,0.2756475,0.01800339,0.0006795136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003365154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034228264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6866696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033188826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003767583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17279394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965302798","doi":"","title":"Reproductive Health Policies in Peru: Social Reforms and Citizenship Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Reproductive rights; Social citizenship; Social policy; Social rights; Political science; Reproductive health; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Public administration; Gender studies; Human rights; Law; Politics; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.22676045925650606,"score_gpt":0.550640081895743,"score_spread":0.3238796226392369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965302798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94763446,0.005388885,0.00006885212,0.001434601,0.0005770613,0.00048795328,0.000027484222,0.00003729877,0.044343404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99132454,0.0064337384,0.00015500466,0.0005964072,0.00072809844,0.000008313247,0.0000056354825,0.00002545705,0.000722811],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965762,0.00045021795,0.00083888386,0.00051615917,0.0008233286,0.0007952244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998136,0.00023608639,0.0006860804,0.00028014425,0.00031759657,0.00034410978],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064107194,0.0002484844,0.00068479,0.0007682299,0.0013153949,0.0007458912,0.0013506733,0.00017778223,0.00040489528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003736013,0.00021610929,0.000107388405,0.0014396505,0.0005957751,0.0012230568,0.00037861188,0.0004819869,0.00000379122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015513648,0.00017693856,0.9026081,0.000056847053,0.00007933982,0.00003642162,0.061641976,0.000008409618,0.0012960022,0.017259797,0.009297337,0.007383717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033902688,0.000009724397,0.9108049,0.00007654418,0.000011674157,0.0000046651494,0.011422241,0.0000028273455,0.00015224365,0.072880566,0.0040287133,0.00026684324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041732684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018002365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055620767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044692398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039804933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967901995","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2019-003","title":"Policy Options for Retargeting the Canada Child Benefit","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Additionality; Incentive; Child poverty; Poverty; Discretion; Public economics; Cash; Child support; Distribution (mathematics); Poverty reduction; Transfer (computing); Business; Cash transfers; Economics; Political science; Finance; Economic growth; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01586831427191885,"score_gpt":0.2563823743413795,"score_spread":0.24051406006946066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967901995","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13317339,0.00022090427,0.00002125773,0.43843424,0.00094893307,0.0009057159,0.00093906187,0.00006137158,0.4252951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633415,0.00007499931,0.00007139078,0.020742714,0.0017119729,0.00004257825,0.0000671004,0.000025852793,0.013921933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797803,0.00006559497,0.00018804897,0.0002477968,0.00027243758,0.0012481114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822474,0.00011805854,0.00007387801,0.0003903431,0.00021030604,0.0009826703],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005133289,0.00014099441,0.00014580366,0.00033980008,0.0019108714,0.00025866166,0.0007270587,0.00012558735,0.00009371263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009701442,0.00012817568,0.000083019666,0.0011277262,0.00013704984,0.0001859514,0.000030025383,0.00018030645,0.000028986502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.0204458e-7,0.0000031987968,0.012979132,0.0000043854925,0.00001783283,5.4330246e-7,0.001787526,0.000027715256,0.000001090014,0.96473074,0.01897622,0.0014711971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014655772,0.000008030716,0.039046865,0.000005185858,0.0000054996303,0.0000018670345,0.005212628,0.00019439701,3.6370238e-7,0.006542717,0.94864666,0.00018921532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99922025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95818806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021759626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03966548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968745706","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2019-016","title":"Expanding the Canada Workers Benefit to Design a Guaranteed Basic Income","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Subsidy; Decile; Poverty; Revenue; Economics; Work (physics); Working poor; Income Support; Tax revenue; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Public economics; Business; Finance; Economic growth","score_opus":0.024443052026652905,"score_gpt":0.26100566389227675,"score_spread":0.23656261186562386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968745706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86776835,0.000082021594,0.00009994744,0.04756116,0.001051302,0.0007494703,0.00010838624,0.00005130303,0.082528085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97673565,0.000010008012,0.00006994541,0.0150726335,0.0004337754,0.000029149087,0.0000053345757,0.00002315243,0.0076203207],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774915,0.00013960358,0.00018478824,0.00027271864,0.00039174268,0.0012620105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792784,0.00016299674,0.000052420717,0.0004157944,0.0001121875,0.001328748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006943472,0.00015953078,0.00017174837,0.00041333743,0.00092846213,0.00031661557,0.00089025864,0.00010935133,0.00017776525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042736312,0.00014093908,0.000050448165,0.0017625497,0.000100746794,0.00016427827,0.000040042778,0.00017477378,0.00010497582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007793714,0.000010429918,0.54041094,0.000012119288,0.00008519251,0.000024335724,0.025853455,0.00038550023,0.000022657392,0.35905683,0.0663758,0.0077549317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040330138,0.000035337835,0.29874983,0.000034465167,0.000012952949,0.0000047394497,0.040291067,0.00019378112,0.0000028579127,0.00326405,0.65639555,0.0006120596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59001976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003137394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03123641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97425556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969564122","doi":"10.1007/s11150-019-09461-2","title":"What influence do empowered women have? Land and the reality of women’s relative power in Peru","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; NorQuest College","funders":"Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers","keywords":"Empowerment; Power (physics); Economics; Women's empowerment; Renting; Demographic economics; Bargaining power; Psychological intervention; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Microeconomics; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.02030273015303596,"score_gpt":0.2615294270317667,"score_spread":0.24122669687873072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969564122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816681,0.013555805,3.1442536e-7,0.00095743587,0.00018946645,0.00062167493,0.000038334543,0.0000037441803,0.0029650957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8151928,0.18416351,0.000013805799,0.00046180803,0.000007280175,0.000014663752,4.426811e-7,0.000007771572,0.00013792464],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857056,0.000332796,0.0005683143,0.00018217626,0.00010387609,0.00024229214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984582,0.00030981092,0.0005894694,0.0005200933,0.0000675796,0.00005486248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036281883,0.000109556044,0.000606336,0.000035481193,0.000053823773,0.00002619845,0.000503493,0.000077467914,0.000026016347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002830814,0.00007067411,0.00010910367,0.00012917994,0.00055785733,0.00036393467,0.00014348199,0.00013481264,0.0000014765009],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015497151,0.00014342122,0.70525384,0.0027786172,0.000179293,2.797073e-7,0.16060299,0.0008845791,0.000022680213,0.12907338,0.000089549656,0.0008164172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003705072,0.0001975046,0.7971857,0.00788255,0.000090192545,0.0000020240884,0.09242193,0.00013918725,0.000025010788,0.07221024,0.025533414,0.00060716906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000849786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039369543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1706077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002408339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016943934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28820068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970739156","doi":"10.1016/j.ehb.2023.101248","title":"The effect of paid parental leave on breastfeeding, parental health and behavior","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics & Human Biology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Parental leave; Breastfeeding; Duration (music); Demographic economics; Health plan; Psychology; Health insurance; Demography; Medicine; Economics; Economic growth; Sociology; Health care; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.024252473740834356,"score_gpt":0.3180962941053467,"score_spread":0.29384382036451234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970739156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99636286,0.00012436217,6.524559e-7,0.0004776865,0.0007017987,0.00024490818,0.000066108056,0.000043066975,0.0019785338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862,0.0007530441,0.0000034845825,0.00009948746,0.00018680142,0.000027461454,0.000077516794,0.000010397156,0.00022182435],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989279,0.00021126428,0.00023164172,0.00023199867,0.000034310506,0.00036287145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936664,0.00023620263,0.0001432823,0.00013066395,0.000010972597,0.00011221729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077883934,0.000110546614,0.00022222495,0.000060028073,0.0007500517,0.00003187107,0.00020028275,0.00009932256,0.0000137792595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028131366,0.000087647975,0.00006169126,0.000060177917,0.0005424818,0.000031830266,0.00007175261,0.00010746129,0.000024479119],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017408433,0.000018432927,0.95215887,0.000006349196,0.000017923488,4.854396e-7,0.0038690392,0.0000023728696,0.00005003399,0.03585364,0.00043654186,0.0075688916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073564757,0.0016852038,0.9782809,0.000010265952,0.00001800616,0.0000024603223,0.009450547,0.0000677926,0.00003791228,0.003059198,0.0064479136,0.00020414288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012826349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005521139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032794442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010272185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006423899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5768867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971589791","doi":"","title":"Parental Divorce: The Experience Among Second Generation Chinese-Canadian Women","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.012499937948200947,"score_gpt":0.273302539837,"score_spread":0.26080260188879906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971589791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.777262,0.000067474866,0.000006237624,0.000035452715,0.002959691,0.0003809567,0.00002987993,0.000032434808,0.21922588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84057486,0.00006470075,0.000011645592,0.0002987283,0.00046215946,0.00010171572,0.00064105605,0.000020931748,0.15782419],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983248,0.00011229618,0.00022715087,0.00035345694,0.00044592432,0.0005363583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917585,0.00003873576,0.00012263973,0.0002828824,0.00012388673,0.0002559949],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030841632,0.00022468947,0.00019438837,0.00010608385,0.0010773656,0.00031960578,0.00052382925,0.0003492853,0.0030893893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057665588,0.00016338975,0.00007818251,0.00030992145,0.00013281839,0.00025985073,0.00001375409,0.00024263885,0.00012203014],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039509446,0.000016572492,0.31965527,0.00001861835,0.000031450494,0.0000020251857,0.6732122,0.000020842024,0.00014800817,0.0047984957,0.0016083815,0.00048418553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007833843,0.0000124201215,0.51234037,0.0000063439034,0.000006479223,1.4997377e-7,0.4824571,0.00045986223,0.0000037264235,0.00026714473,0.004097688,0.00027036385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16236681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96259344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8002266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041615454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083251577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971695699","doi":"10.7202/1061200ar","title":"Pauvreté et négligence parentale : vraiment indissociables ?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de psychoéducation","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029064088924751798,"score_gpt":0.334138441614576,"score_spread":0.3050743526898242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971695699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89686316,0.0051196455,0.00086281286,0.02423907,0.009879916,0.0005921692,0.00005655282,0.000057159774,0.062329486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94824755,0.0043318267,0.0011524713,0.0011980921,0.0007373347,0.000043624914,0.00009261272,0.000029872286,0.044166636],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979273,0.0003783421,0.000338052,0.00045877302,0.0003127485,0.00058479264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891275,0.00011592002,0.00025236286,0.00039015015,0.00012796668,0.00020083919],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009773923,0.0002062009,0.00022288266,0.000073802425,0.00024400731,0.00011222627,0.00035079883,0.00028192363,0.0007899788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050372157,0.00025689937,0.00011875389,0.0006454578,0.00013477891,0.00034778196,0.000029720866,0.00025056794,0.0013024699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011309809,0.0007684211,0.590515,0.0002809889,0.00007755211,0.0000018134577,0.14573005,0.00031756386,0.00049464457,0.2327969,0.010805528,0.018200194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043363552,0.00013309285,0.6215868,0.0004270963,0.0000924541,0.0000096167905,0.07236515,0.001013432,0.00003945437,0.023260249,0.27999437,0.00064466556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016966942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012088442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26918882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007300591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048695784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971720697","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3304894","title":"Monetary Incentives to Vote: Evidence From a Nationwide Policy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Monetary policy; Economics; Public economics; Monetary economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.016229621111292364,"score_gpt":0.30410116981095126,"score_spread":0.2878715486996589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971720697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96245337,0.0022768492,0.022176675,0.009373279,0.00056369597,0.00016428393,0.0000072873513,0.000052624906,0.0029319576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98692185,0.0055817533,0.0006413571,0.0008022279,0.003116952,0.0000034751947,0.0000020462392,0.0000141603505,0.0029161798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968657,0.00024919296,0.00022951384,0.00023697093,0.0005356296,0.0018829877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991123,0.00010628982,0.00011421639,0.00015542924,0.0002943868,0.0002173495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016939865,0.00012652043,0.00013971694,0.00018415233,0.00090577203,0.00014358312,0.0005538897,0.00009457625,0.000021841232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076047145,0.0001221216,0.00007833829,0.0006642821,0.00019709265,0.00046961827,0.000056756606,0.00071397715,0.000101219244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020545321,0.00019231011,0.32311562,0.0000050277126,0.0004142981,0.000009975314,0.10644761,0.000112722075,0.0033088126,0.5018363,0.0023509655,0.062000923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047911587,0.0004727387,0.24145482,0.00009223566,0.00005220613,0.000016271735,0.045294855,0.00028726485,0.00006798812,0.69706327,0.014249289,0.00046994782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021472989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1424081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19522698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001276733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057865535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972313579","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104223","title":"Adjustment cost and incentives to work: Evidence from a disability insurance program","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Melbourne; University of Calgary","keywords":"Incentive; Economics; Earnings; Disability insurance; Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Price elasticity of demand; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Social security; Accounting","score_opus":0.08196619627696262,"score_gpt":0.31618681673586296,"score_spread":0.23422062045890035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972313579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750517,0.00079728256,0.0004163822,0.022600802,0.0004710833,0.0003408287,0.000025659047,0.000017917146,0.00027833966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923211,0.0023756805,0.0038117187,0.0008759449,0.00057957036,0.00000916154,0.000001220054,0.000007412691,0.000018223433],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988145,0.00016191446,0.00041788374,0.00019898142,0.00013710544,0.0002695624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986727,0.00019226763,0.00029184064,0.000109731525,0.00016205505,0.0005714002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008926855,0.00010050852,0.00025218504,0.000029075607,0.0001419404,0.0002714791,0.00036118034,0.000068996866,0.000031989686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008070717,0.000095590825,0.00007487551,0.00022373817,0.00024520291,0.00081171136,0.000093933784,0.00018063516,0.0000064898877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034650966,0.00009911945,0.90738606,0.000006304591,0.00003525775,0.0000011155119,0.012919771,0.00006957893,0.000005348109,0.0010220057,0.00033907816,0.078081705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025811305,0.0001249665,0.96312046,0.000031070645,0.0000119933175,5.314543e-7,0.009638935,0.00018401747,0.0000019114543,0.0006468226,0.025863998,0.00011717985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019742455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091703463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07796452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002911583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030862232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38980806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972965649","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2019-043","title":"Marital Property Laws and Women’s Labour Supply","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Labour supply; Incentive; Work (physics); Economics; Demographic economics; Marital status; Civil code; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.02307730315837282,"score_gpt":0.2453696610831828,"score_spread":0.22229235792481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972965649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6805708,0.000107331165,0.0000043332675,0.19576241,0.00015975475,0.00022845683,0.0003530694,0.000086892025,0.12272698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635411,0.000105635016,0.000054991255,0.026377412,0.0008450863,0.00002362807,0.0000137348225,0.00001692178,0.0090215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984123,0.000087921464,0.00012254683,0.00024815986,0.00018725252,0.0009418274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971239,0.000017931749,0.000028356098,0.00013091174,0.00009444944,0.0026044413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000239879,0.00011674704,0.000139812,0.0001754653,0.0005549935,0.0003598063,0.00031916285,0.00012826547,0.00026831566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060843094,0.0001023579,0.000027013735,0.00069636526,0.0002637556,0.00030304928,0.000042292224,0.0001491483,0.000066998175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025973147,0.000016737966,0.1430403,0.00002363488,0.000027214377,0.00003017364,0.05730871,3.089996e-7,0.00001259082,0.7404711,0.044237323,0.014829269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002057993,0.000025807334,0.07229961,0.0000016149907,0.0000018907893,0.0000017095746,0.011305978,0.000041444036,2.424211e-7,0.0017674587,0.9141802,0.00016820937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7121913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7714125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8699429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007160622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077375514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973195154","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-24135-3_8","title":"How Much Does Work Pay at Older Ages?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Social security; Work (physics); Compensation (psychology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Tax rate; Labour economics; Sample (material); Microsimulation; Retirement age; Face (sociological concept); Economics; Business; Psychology; Pension; Monetary economics; Finance; Social psychology; Sociology; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.019611718239010496,"score_gpt":0.24571069000020446,"score_spread":0.22609897176119395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973195154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012086541,0.00035712848,0.00011534277,0.0027823471,0.0031122724,0.00049026666,0.000042981832,0.0001803532,0.99171066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029505996,0.001688161,0.0002584209,0.0008061639,0.0009030776,0.000005087436,0.00006092488,0.00006347516,0.9667087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794936,0.00004256335,0.00020793127,0.000565286,0.0007116998,0.00052315166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987666,0.00018207911,0.00017582768,0.0005164556,0.0001618733,0.00019716861],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002936124,0.00036707136,0.0004173847,0.000096038806,0.00041425123,0.0002645753,0.0005089709,0.00085706013,0.0043757767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039553892,0.00022427586,0.00025601062,0.0000645779,0.00030828352,0.00013296898,0.00016875494,0.00038673737,0.0010263054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069228336,0.000017336235,0.011161202,0.00004104908,0.000110935216,0.000018539664,0.0064438106,6.256071e-7,0.0000037542252,0.8996219,0.080078155,0.0024957818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001638351,0.000014101681,0.0035297403,0.000065347995,0.000053267155,3.6643107e-7,0.004453393,0.0000015251868,0.0000011159683,0.01863775,0.9725053,0.00057428493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034008973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054963185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8924271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002544507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023243598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973447421","doi":"","title":"Three Essays on Vulnerable Workers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Irvine; University of Toronto; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Earnings; Duration (music); Labour economics; Shock (circulatory); Demographic economics; Disability insurance; Unemployment; Vulnerability (computing); Job security; Social security; Economics; Business; Economic growth; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.01696080738656207,"score_gpt":0.23384948763177657,"score_spread":0.21688868024521452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973447421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54759,0.00008386507,0.00016204483,0.0007797261,0.0005193593,0.0003252026,0.00046041037,0.0003795184,0.44969985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98343575,0.00003200763,0.00035176278,0.0013592306,0.00031850013,0.000015683961,0.00021664181,0.00007777561,0.014192651],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974242,0.00014336413,0.00032831778,0.0005523485,0.0007362484,0.0008155121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985778,0.00031685698,0.00011256218,0.0005143417,0.000047388832,0.00043106373],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000476726,0.00029837232,0.00028678103,0.000152081,0.00054907287,0.0017320421,0.0007911621,0.0002822677,0.0015564826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025529368,0.00028061826,0.00019217223,0.0007339968,0.00017976946,0.0031109133,0.00014737378,0.0007261068,0.013472186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059486818,0.00014198266,0.92838466,0.000017910339,0.000031482043,0.000013273613,0.0002656469,0.00005527405,0.000013138259,0.05983599,0.0075841243,0.0035970472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00107908,0.00016831157,0.07531256,0.00014268378,0.00002091146,0.0000017883013,0.0032301291,0.00026772814,0.00006268834,0.1223912,0.7962707,0.0010522015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057599005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005098955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8530721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030547226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977446988","doi":"","title":"Les résultats éducatifs de long terme des élèves de l'école secondaire privée au Québec : une évaluation des effets de traitement avec données longitudinales [Long Term Educational Attainment of Private High School Students in Québec: Estimates of Treatment Effects from Longitudinal Data]","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.056971932162586086,"score_gpt":0.3656613777848932,"score_spread":0.30868944562230716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977446988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942198,0.0014721979,0.00021374923,0.0008276674,0.00030291846,0.002156198,0.0005022693,0.000022624023,0.00028258958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98445433,0.0072590634,0.006405826,0.000016616705,0.00027644986,0.0007339725,0.00037179855,0.00007967284,0.0004022587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99278206,0.0016891574,0.0016024008,0.0015353078,0.0007886101,0.0016024715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930621,0.0039688693,0.00084859424,0.0012458108,0.0003120244,0.00056259317],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004251778,0.0007413905,0.00121389,0.0005387003,0.00070750155,0.00019966642,0.0020026218,0.0005101089,0.00012785874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016530454,0.0007221704,0.00024900754,0.0003488757,0.0029655208,0.0004253955,0.001079533,0.00063977117,0.000007041411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020417284,0.002218446,0.8020916,0.0010957978,0.0006942694,0.000022514123,0.04999015,0.0075103296,0.00063287606,0.0002824594,0.000002007851,0.13525538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002165206,0.0004676511,0.9802503,0.003026922,0.00018575075,0.0000068452377,0.0056593884,0.002104005,0.0006554471,0.0049067754,0.000015189939,0.0005565086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46440747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8623852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3979777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031338006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018735427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978406053","doi":"10.32535/ijabim.v4i2.570","title":"Gender Imbalance in Nigeria’s Legislature: A Peep into the 7th and 8th Assemblies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Applied Business and International Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Berger (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012035842721125088,"score_gpt":0.2697634100193091,"score_spread":0.257727567298184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978406053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9023287,0.0004052892,0.0013641826,0.0073188692,0.002830364,0.00024268846,0.0000048056218,0.000010564409,0.08549448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930342,0.0040071304,0.00070764404,0.00089807896,0.0004427274,0.000008515112,0.0000066651064,0.00000975884,0.00088532513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985097,0.000029054054,0.00035420188,0.0001903191,0.0007581115,0.000158581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990698,0.00006761682,0.00026400952,0.000088615525,0.00046142994,0.00004852193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064722996,0.00012814101,0.00016047942,0.00028442082,0.00008900327,0.00031990878,0.00060796307,0.0000584659,0.000058554328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028612667,0.00009736632,0.000040055176,0.00019464342,0.00012776871,0.00035073413,0.00019615698,0.00017479547,0.0000062439217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039019212,0.00022930543,0.22139798,0.00005009674,0.0006866947,0.00006472529,0.026380641,0.0016256854,0.00034884445,0.72089183,0.0012965539,0.026637442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014697803,0.00001863238,0.8462525,0.000078239085,0.000022182574,0.000015018532,0.022743687,0.0005562994,0.000005027734,0.030620469,0.09801227,0.00020589046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001883004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040158074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6902714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013798299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006649386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39704832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979587450","doi":"","title":"The impact of the knowledge-based economy on women's participation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge economy; Knowledge society; Work (physics); New economy; Information economy; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Economy; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0225569698079757,"score_gpt":0.3162819727450624,"score_spread":0.2937250029370867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979587450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6908907,0.000010127672,0.000012620843,0.0002975862,0.00006319964,0.0000999523,0.0000016929083,0.000013011698,0.3086111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99164695,0.000018606963,0.00000576427,0.00014690719,0.000056722125,0.000018312452,5.214964e-7,0.0000036450976,0.008102567],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933934,0.00015383527,0.000112284106,0.000078632285,0.00008785648,0.00022802662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948823,0.00018602888,0.00003816353,0.00018353069,0.000049764923,0.000054252723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041495293,0.00005486674,0.00006170488,0.0000119370925,0.000444928,0.000041529147,0.00020690112,0.000038271417,0.0007365925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004077634,0.000026732421,0.00007581336,0.00017973573,0.0001751901,0.00004459545,0.0000060568996,0.000049637114,0.00006660343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020236649,0.0011758939,0.4291036,0.000015685979,0.00017100803,4.2923241e-7,0.15385355,0.026595186,0.0000870421,0.24889205,0.009521802,0.13038136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005217726,0.00021346899,0.9117129,0.000008723998,0.000011471905,3.4725385e-8,0.012175876,0.009834379,0.00006246895,0.011976352,0.053307284,0.0001752939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070435606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012305655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48260927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001628248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000304186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8065172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979797233","doi":"10.1177/0958928720963324","title":"Reducing mommy penalties with daddy quotas","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural experiment; Difference in differences; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Significant difference; Percentage point; Economics; Labour economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0443435289234627,"score_gpt":0.3097906158552715,"score_spread":0.2654470869318088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979797233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6624658,0.00018076868,0.00032117017,0.032935016,0.00029937093,0.00010838785,0.000013869046,0.000054850127,0.30362076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781895,0.00019828495,0.00046494242,0.0030124898,0.017311938,2.1406076e-7,0.0000010264584,0.000034819375,0.000786759],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806464,0.00054569024,0.00037701978,0.00012490037,0.0005423501,0.00034537603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884397,0.000039456212,0.0004432372,0.00006983256,0.0002943121,0.00030917994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007691294,0.00012920357,0.00025426206,0.00009954426,0.0006371444,0.00016117143,0.00044841875,0.00004459739,0.000031187898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041191233,0.000108752516,0.00014025616,0.0005329242,0.00029411458,0.00028287416,0.000056794855,0.00035972268,0.000038548213],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025838564,0.00019157847,0.011309197,0.00006134679,0.0003406617,0.00044416744,0.78041434,0.0003065681,0.0014858089,0.077122055,0.11501904,0.013046869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026299804,0.0010139297,0.17713106,0.00012105416,0.00022623305,0.00004983891,0.26560485,0.0000521245,0.000039532602,0.0018251553,0.5504373,0.00086898473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006613167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059775222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5148095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121539226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007216851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49004638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980015837","doi":"10.24843/jekt.2018.v11.i02.p01","title":"Pengaruh Fertilitas Terhadap Partisipasi Tenaga Kerja Perempuan","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnal Ekonomi Kuantitatif Terapan","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Encana (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Instrumental variable; Total fertility rate; Economics; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Demography; Labour economics; Population; Sociology; Family planning; Research methodology; Econometrics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0374463722024439,"score_gpt":0.31254142338500557,"score_spread":0.27509505118256167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980015837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9317199,0.00026619746,0.00047806036,0.002129993,0.0019510769,0.0003376241,0.000022796097,0.00019255003,0.06290178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932901,0.00019808451,0.0015110471,0.0012487702,0.0012689653,0.000023875951,0.000016699905,0.0000469951,0.0023954134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970222,0.00033577136,0.0005739108,0.0005678197,0.0005344264,0.00096587406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982383,0.00027629375,0.00019811523,0.00046455284,0.00035919086,0.00046350586],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008963085,0.0003214102,0.00040108073,0.00020173144,0.0014271893,0.0004283498,0.0007068092,0.00021591714,0.00027177067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034649114,0.00029775104,0.00023075312,0.00044095656,0.00094692735,0.000588042,0.00010273119,0.0003502048,0.0003392823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024750835,0.0005054115,0.75338745,0.000054148408,0.0002807273,0.000048796486,0.109829456,0.000023904304,0.0022248104,0.09180058,0.016039927,0.025557281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010165768,0.0005409913,0.7261151,0.00007572338,0.00008041536,0.000011834153,0.03545971,0.0010916305,0.00010888441,0.002681608,0.2320293,0.0007882355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011966779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004891536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21598937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021633881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004229979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980154874","doi":"","title":"Women’s Economic Engagement and Childcare: Moving from Survival to a ‘Triple Boon’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Political science; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.0415869365384216,"score_gpt":0.2898016673234126,"score_spread":0.248214730784991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980154874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741781,0.00043410345,0.00010135708,0.0004274885,0.0034378867,0.0008527672,0.000033209388,0.000038316226,0.020496806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890061,0.0014117096,0.0060142474,0.00032927425,0.00013499259,0.000098949444,0.000020173757,0.000017740962,0.0029668147],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980362,0.00008417773,0.0004619845,0.00050310715,0.00038460267,0.000529936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992255,0.00008290064,0.00015273255,0.0002453246,0.00009278442,0.00020077445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010960995,0.00022908168,0.0005115064,0.00010972293,0.00062511646,0.000074104915,0.0003755312,0.00005921843,0.00013770319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108410066,0.00023283405,0.000039694274,0.00016372398,0.00014436584,0.00031759165,0.00056306744,0.00012041045,0.00015890793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001019045,0.00019502311,0.47875807,0.00014335803,0.0015562249,0.000024184581,0.46246895,0.00071366195,0.00040904648,0.03287885,0.0036350288,0.019115698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015463402,0.00006953165,0.22869448,0.00011328065,0.000028779423,4.1494786e-7,0.11730338,0.000022325186,0.00012855054,0.00045286323,0.6510264,0.00061360374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017345549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006203625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64739144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084073277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068165676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94946975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980965456","doi":"10.1086/703115","title":"Reserving Time for Daddy: The Consequences of Fathers’ Quotas","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":243,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parental leave; Compensation (psychology); Framing (construction); Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Family Leave; Financial compensation; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.026165753596930144,"score_gpt":0.2806644461882839,"score_spread":0.25449869259135377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980965456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901821,0.000252745,0.000047867827,0.0029930673,0.0007557392,0.00019056044,0.000060214814,0.000004612002,0.0055130953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99535155,0.0008590499,0.0014889811,0.00043228935,0.00033086928,0.0000015832687,0.0000012573441,0.000012993608,0.0015214036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990488,0.0000940498,0.00044894268,0.00009037189,0.00011304178,0.00020477784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983013,0.00048878917,0.0006525401,0.00016629252,0.0003222019,0.00006882416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016995271,0.0000785625,0.00026433732,0.000061761384,0.00014652034,0.00006595371,0.00057011226,0.00008312412,0.000112583424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020501744,0.00005842056,0.00013975486,0.000107706604,0.00022703443,0.00025453718,0.000028440652,0.0001214692,0.000016042333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036579018,0.00023430727,0.42302203,0.00012865584,0.0008072691,0.0000061326937,0.095770136,0.0070894584,0.013141164,0.449111,0.007069969,0.0032540807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043153693,0.0012618348,0.09090426,0.000248953,0.00033561443,0.000036978323,0.25272346,0.0050283642,0.0012931877,0.14785731,0.49502224,0.0009724399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018712114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034612897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48795226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009967385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069684174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23823212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981074518","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1906196116","title":"Work time and market integration in the original affluent society","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Subsistence agriculture; Socioeconomic status; Work (physics); Time allocation; Demographic economics; Scale (ratio); Economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Geography; Sociology; Demography; Social science","score_opus":0.024949184685476126,"score_gpt":0.29876379614175075,"score_spread":0.2738146114562746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981074518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95453054,0.00007043864,5.717763e-7,0.0049734497,0.00002524118,0.00020044223,0.0000037874697,0.0000050917233,0.04019042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778295,0.00009389957,0.00072793977,0.00047018533,0.0000541525,0.0000040643204,7.761972e-8,0.0000014948567,0.0008652456],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984862,0.000019827801,0.00016764007,0.00015299483,0.0010366881,0.00013662243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949133,0.00017611853,0.00017281885,0.0000061024866,0.00013543337,0.000018183558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035971852,0.000057870515,0.000086170505,0.000052259296,0.00024344951,0.000052823965,0.0006061687,0.00007331181,0.000031684707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019228768,0.000033087435,0.000047667763,0.0009288386,0.000815934,0.0003602101,0.00004967124,0.00014664202,0.0000024505493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022797045,0.000089787834,0.53259957,0.00004109862,0.000014425783,4.0087547e-9,0.035330534,0.000073532894,0.012586614,0.40969306,0.00847059,0.0010779969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017932753,0.000031472653,0.9160117,0.00009937684,0.0000088753695,0.000001038213,0.020785956,0.002573321,0.00041465927,0.057871766,0.0019193252,0.000103192695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003730542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011612088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38341212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004659697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005391949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30063426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981575349","doi":"","title":"Family Diversity and Gender: Special Issue","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Gender diversity; Sociology; Gender studies; Economics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.22745869200083244,"score_gpt":0.3633803183607999,"score_spread":0.1359216263599675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981575349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8828541,0.006088188,0.00020215065,0.00008198482,0.0018574931,0.0001210608,0.000007054669,0.000014625812,0.108773366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871646,0.008405208,0.0011655617,0.00036171553,0.0022790432,0.0000010448248,2.3696582e-7,0.0000061751157,0.0006164104],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982317,0.0002956599,0.0004085806,0.00017170091,0.0005778252,0.00031449544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982844,0.00019348548,0.00038012816,0.000097054326,0.00087179005,0.00017313534],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000800826,0.00019065806,0.00059523067,0.00014665522,0.0017488863,0.000031452983,0.00032451501,0.000076003336,0.00003047206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007955404,0.00015845282,0.00012773085,0.00024325727,0.0008463312,0.00038834236,0.0003867253,0.00025700065,0.000017706563],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001146246,0.00013573609,0.27531782,0.000015776704,0.000584266,0.000045898178,0.6714947,0.000005632519,0.000055070483,0.010258129,0.041566182,0.0004061366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004307822,0.00017331215,0.62592393,0.00001545632,0.000093823684,0.000002773802,0.34280565,0.0000041117432,0.0000058719547,0.008763067,0.021629639,0.00015157236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023043559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003004806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3506061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012223833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012146889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982073298","doi":"10.3386/w26416","title":"The Long-Run Effects of California’s Paid Family Leave Act on Women’s Careers and Childbearing: New Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design and U.S. Tax Data","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of the Treasury; Washington Center for Equitable Growth; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Earnings; Parental leave; Quarter (Canadian coin); Maternity leave; Demographic economics; Work hours; Wage; Work (physics); Hourly wage; Labour economics; Economics; Demography; Psychology; Working hours; Geography; National Longitudinal Surveys; Sociology","score_opus":0.30121076215304443,"score_gpt":0.4688432361161497,"score_spread":0.16763247396310527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982073298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9480076,0.017834488,0.00017343111,0.0016208843,0.0014616733,0.0034402057,0.0012060249,0.000026004656,0.026229676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593536,0.03473644,0.00019105432,0.000019517696,0.00059434504,0.000040847797,0.00022964434,0.00003215794,0.004802387],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995326,0.00085126003,0.00052993634,0.0007943116,0.0019862338,0.0005122843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891812,0.00875077,0.0004809306,0.00071216654,0.00064007397,0.00023484917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010702834,0.00023897635,0.00055406353,0.00025742222,0.00044026767,0.00020714871,0.001217156,0.00040489223,0.000017876551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006869465,0.00017991559,0.000063631,0.0001447244,0.00082565576,0.00029059706,0.00063999434,0.0007212763,0.000011068602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002284786,0.0004587966,0.56924325,0.002398865,0.0025057995,0.000042814212,0.041188046,0.0013602932,0.0015766827,0.025444124,0.26649562,0.08700095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003377101,0.0014030344,0.8220099,0.007108726,0.00021926267,0.000007993842,0.015287285,0.0040502925,0.0003340448,0.11895383,0.02556248,0.0016860287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03794579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053970166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2527667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014237041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008190451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984498619","doi":"","title":"Beyond shelter: the power of women stepping into connection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Lu Zone Ul (Laurentian University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Connection (principal bundle); Stepping stone; Power (physics); Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Physics; Economics; Economic growth; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.007214004944294021,"score_gpt":0.2212314251017171,"score_spread":0.21401742015742306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984498619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87316006,0.00016346332,0.00034340355,0.000085651074,0.0028410328,0.00036742637,0.000020523627,0.000055365537,0.122963056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91009724,0.00028290637,0.000049353344,0.000046492714,0.00009338073,0.0000010479489,0.00025824903,0.000022942662,0.08914839],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833983,0.00022130343,0.00020231564,0.00035158743,0.0004565168,0.000428456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884146,0.000082128885,0.00033512065,0.00033320425,0.00028488695,0.0001232105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003554409,0.00021244722,0.00032064258,0.00040763448,0.00056910625,0.00006645664,0.00061642495,0.00038472112,0.00042492824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003826393,0.00021517719,0.000172204,0.00079857215,0.00016751587,0.00024390093,0.00004954672,0.00032098088,0.00003399386],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002041126,0.00017308186,0.0077662775,0.00028749157,0.0005685684,0.000020231892,0.83275026,0.00009725376,0.0006723759,0.15363081,0.0011434533,0.0026860945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041950215,0.000075604206,0.0045372155,0.00007620831,0.00013464359,2.6324346e-7,0.9326685,0.000029335044,0.000030433739,0.00069054397,0.061027393,0.00031032407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029468902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043332454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15294027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005675581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004466031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97412425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986400683","doi":"10.1111/apel.12272","title":"How do private transfers respond to public transfers? Evolutionary evidence from Thailand","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian-Pacific Economic Literature","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Assumption University","funders":"","keywords":"Crowding out; Economics; Public economics; Transfer (computing); Econometric analysis; Crowding; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.015158809497409935,"score_gpt":0.23733498837696468,"score_spread":0.22217617887955474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986400683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9403634,0.001930139,0.0003916727,0.023830514,0.0026407652,0.0008976435,0.0010849774,0.00015344787,0.028707445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841202,0.00082109025,0.00085951155,0.00036691714,0.00060714566,0.000037165348,0.00015583319,0.000042953463,0.012989221],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972214,0.00033506402,0.000387217,0.0009575594,0.00031948215,0.00077925954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838275,0.00023185994,0.00007996245,0.00072813855,0.000102226855,0.0004750792],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006732552,0.00036079276,0.00042168782,0.00027890666,0.000388857,0.0015354505,0.00084216235,0.0004832052,0.0004753748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087602,0.00036029262,0.00023189912,0.0005224314,0.00016319392,0.001977273,0.000036407913,0.0004677341,0.00039179376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070126884,0.00017861745,0.34164777,0.00015011962,0.00044806002,0.00007577212,0.47820678,0.00014920633,0.005483153,0.13381588,0.029416658,0.009726716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021108217,0.000591386,0.180396,0.00078507134,0.00009622765,0.000013792745,0.11911674,0.00034014927,0.000116384304,0.0136837615,0.68064094,0.002108749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014911909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005728393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65122426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045216517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004605972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W298893810","doi":"10.5860/choice.185300","title":"Counting on Marilyn Waring: new advances in feminist economics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.04395857817905215,"score_gpt":0.34151964386644945,"score_spread":0.2975610656873973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W298893810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5691134,0.08909713,0.0016336553,0.0060727983,0.0046892487,0.0023108695,0.00007381127,0.00031167304,0.32669747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17182589,0.7755731,0.014987319,0.016215686,0.0087798145,0.000053070013,0.0001929701,0.000116379495,0.012255815],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984882,0.000160352,0.000493122,0.00033703467,0.00013303482,0.00038826867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898237,0.00029293448,0.00023918213,0.0002931052,0.00003253639,0.00015985534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012562356,0.00017444872,0.00043267346,0.000069647205,0.00019671986,0.00007219246,0.0003880041,0.00010995929,0.000035396843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010985556,0.00016341968,0.00009415502,0.0002754873,0.00008636984,0.00027656948,0.000044044016,0.0002259781,0.00009398103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000106074785,0.00027684114,0.27173442,0.00030259838,0.000009915566,0.0000014290716,0.0035145269,0.00037031996,0.000012096333,0.05573727,0.001445404,0.66658455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022838892,0.000025801786,0.014413163,0.00019918788,0.000010076584,2.5212492e-7,0.0006353176,0.0005116044,5.248079e-7,0.0010906465,0.98269576,0.00018927315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094024825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022051744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98125035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016558962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016519484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989745681","doi":"","title":"Inefficient Couples: Non-minimization of the Tax Burden among French Cohabiting Couples","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Heuristics; Tax credit; Public economics; Transaction cost; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.015392138499742867,"score_gpt":0.23819458285513076,"score_spread":0.2228024443553879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989745681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8516602,0.00072420447,0.08801608,0.010589325,0.0008769991,0.0012728703,0.00021061437,0.00021123004,0.046438515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98951113,0.001014852,0.0054282267,0.000092818605,0.00009475781,0.000053536012,0.00028477935,0.000043436732,0.0034764789],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99372387,0.0033749992,0.0007462665,0.0007159333,0.0010009541,0.00043799213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99319196,0.001224066,0.0011058857,0.0014626909,0.0028043187,0.00021108969],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004434831,0.00032703215,0.00045998415,0.00012554573,0.0009539332,0.00035726646,0.0021004402,0.0004181661,0.000081982245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036884723,0.00031113133,0.00028185773,0.0008956716,0.001031755,0.00011033448,0.0014644504,0.0007070606,0.000010344049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012406836,0.0008460477,0.35484374,0.00078988925,0.000268751,0.0000051530515,0.505626,0.020085718,0.0028811798,0.09872735,0.0046100835,0.0113036735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001157959,0.0000015423198,0.42790437,0.004940074,0.00029372235,0.0000016628053,0.03018004,0.50751776,0.004047953,0.0053824075,0.017133784,0.0014387015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021172937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01578942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48743206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021218686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010455474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991322029","doi":"10.3386/w26484","title":"Leaning In or Not Leaning Out? Opt-Out Choice Framing Attenuates Gender Differences in the Decision to Compete","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Framing (construction); Framing effect; Psychology; Social psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.5045901213065079,"score_gpt":0.5338127032407138,"score_spread":0.029222581934205905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991322029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63486975,0.000438295,0.00008799586,0.0010687708,0.0017661586,0.0014771848,0.00008727916,0.000019941883,0.36018458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99136263,0.0011862867,0.0004347703,0.00013081073,0.00083874725,0.00006624932,0.00008036432,0.0000324802,0.0058676735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99399763,0.00065523275,0.00093801366,0.0007241728,0.0029136993,0.0007712182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897115,0.008512782,0.00029944762,0.00033387396,0.0010293773,0.00011300358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0145906415,0.00025793424,0.00064605393,0.001237305,0.00038901906,0.00029172082,0.0015306224,0.0004865313,0.00018656127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057938253,0.00020659146,0.00012769196,0.000490402,0.00028449434,0.00025861623,0.00030059015,0.0012780078,0.00017151864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023377643,0.00024431094,0.7914562,0.00030958638,0.00017231761,0.000029026947,0.079449974,0.0048567345,0.00013342485,0.10626446,0.009957344,0.006892838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015274424,0.00026171232,0.8201366,0.0012312635,0.000027423297,0.0000055595424,0.08066958,0.004133459,0.000012162561,0.056133907,0.034721725,0.0011391621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014923746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07657067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35649285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021715662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054438175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994744465","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3517044","title":"Childlessness, Childfreeness and Compensation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Childlessness; Compensation (psychology); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Demography; Fertility","score_opus":0.007086719239502253,"score_gpt":0.2422334048077707,"score_spread":0.23514668556826845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994744465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858805,0.0014333278,0.0015596526,0.00077117706,0.00043030197,0.00014374714,0.0000014830222,0.00002999044,0.009749819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906559,0.0073432187,0.000040066116,0.00012815555,0.00033038342,0.0000010927881,0.0000037780364,0.000012058094,0.0014853558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979999,0.00012783344,0.00014846229,0.00015385437,0.00029521834,0.0012747443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996038,0.000034520017,0.0000981692,0.00009900632,0.00007922592,0.00008525252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014935025,0.000095467374,0.00013707699,0.00006645696,0.0005236251,0.00010387529,0.00020262733,0.00008670091,0.00003350983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026445565,0.00008965097,0.000044824774,0.00016731794,0.00008752097,0.00024478894,0.000022761598,0.00073187053,0.00003710959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008064055,0.000023677467,0.2943958,0.0000029168355,0.000033721873,4.4234585e-7,0.0028828487,0.000029110437,0.00004109883,0.6971836,0.0000091680195,0.005389508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012346567,0.00016119915,0.50448394,0.00002545065,0.000037996193,0.000083310966,0.06602325,0.00026024372,0.000003850058,0.42140532,0.005914198,0.0003665721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006241235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007281437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27577832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036005213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014211005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4063213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997614179","doi":"","title":"The Motherhood Wage Penalty and Its Determinants: A Public-Private Comparison","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Public sector; Private sector; Labour economics; Economics; Control (management); Economic growth; Management","score_opus":0.08411541889975689,"score_gpt":0.3732003178300232,"score_spread":0.28908489893026634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997614179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89994246,0.0010507518,0.000001846845,0.0012592815,0.00066992466,0.0009404422,0.000068734924,0.00004969354,0.096016884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95871335,0.03764714,0.00012366415,0.00007684129,0.00030367714,0.00013568353,0.000015037293,0.000052154865,0.002932445],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559206,0.0010564178,0.0006621777,0.0008282681,0.0005515048,0.0013095969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726206,0.0007947218,0.00027043108,0.00084284705,0.000341793,0.0004881751],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075974134,0.0003051865,0.0005490731,0.0002499101,0.0011288055,0.0008734547,0.0015562037,0.0005814346,0.000019743811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016969264,0.00026674333,0.00011358988,0.00020051046,0.000853094,0.00019419653,0.0015598899,0.0017125133,0.00001591852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017291073,0.0005946836,0.43754554,0.00032075436,0.00034507152,0.000087959794,0.056170937,0.0014458864,0.00004125576,0.039144084,0.0009960565,0.46313486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002566485,0.00032467602,0.10020108,0.00042421927,0.000048779053,0.0000141924165,0.16031043,0.14280309,0.000029581068,0.045881134,0.5450448,0.0023515536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059612753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018854696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5440487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001061837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017351848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999201285","doi":"","title":"Three essays on the economics of family ties","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family ties; Positive economics; Genealogy; Sociology; Economics; History","score_opus":0.021913756386948594,"score_gpt":0.2304682152279141,"score_spread":0.20855445884096552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999201285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65921795,0.00008093277,0.000031868916,0.00009223063,0.0011180093,0.00027992346,0.00010282338,0.00003389669,0.33904237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416302,0.0019770043,0.000033547145,0.00016025011,0.00013523606,0.0000010527915,0.00028254348,0.000037437017,0.055742744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873996,0.00011676882,0.00018860461,0.00035042808,0.00028774142,0.0003164956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987198,0.00024708506,0.0003001044,0.00044235066,0.00020635156,0.00008432483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002703157,0.00024546564,0.00033446422,0.00030493664,0.00043530855,0.00005070646,0.0009430927,0.00048042185,0.000103373466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004338782,0.00023555543,0.00021795236,0.00043127078,0.00020904343,0.00016663576,0.000042991356,0.0003705344,0.000101743666],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002044817,0.0001244385,0.2598823,0.00011032999,0.0002527727,0.0000125556135,0.0032844446,0.0003457211,0.0000043388695,0.7177119,0.01662628,0.0014404135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042166366,0.000101039885,0.012270986,0.000096098636,0.00015995183,2.8638872e-10,0.8423968,0.00013050433,0.00003593463,0.0058790105,0.13803855,0.00046947552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032461304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43633738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83911234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023135565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006014946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9605672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000043678","doi":"","title":"Are Women Not ‘Working’? Interactions between Childcare and Women’s Economic Engagement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Work (physics); Engineering","score_opus":0.10044013903815938,"score_gpt":0.32464820944106015,"score_spread":0.22420807040290078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000043678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849693,0.0002079068,0.00008610602,0.0029722962,0.0010611828,0.00051284925,0.00003569362,0.00006217808,0.010092486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949715,0.0012804694,0.0015615551,0.00089326454,0.00029203336,0.00015552291,0.000014592794,0.000016518878,0.00081455475],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981158,0.00008245038,0.00051488157,0.00044500254,0.00030218382,0.0005397328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903005,0.00008148625,0.0003527561,0.00014847051,0.000093826486,0.00029339455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006210895,0.00023518004,0.00053222966,0.00008623121,0.0010893473,0.000077351775,0.00035023654,0.000052960237,0.0000835159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017446249,0.00024197953,0.00004214262,0.00019715088,0.0002935087,0.0003194841,0.00045721492,0.00021118706,0.000047473713],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004738358,0.0000797353,0.36980075,0.0001686432,0.0013739053,0.00002654108,0.6052283,0.00018691696,0.000025322599,0.004955615,0.003206471,0.0149004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062004843,0.000033596054,0.13649948,0.00006910181,0.000024109358,4.1167684e-7,0.17051004,0.0000071134873,0.000036799156,0.000092430564,0.69179314,0.0003137178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008371486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010254579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6885867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010879845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044225898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9867639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005231804","doi":"","title":"Evaluating the design of tax-free investments to promote household savings in South Africa: an international comparison","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Boloka Institutional Repository (North-west University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Public economics; Business","score_opus":0.08761195528451213,"score_gpt":0.30489467968280826,"score_spread":0.21728272439829613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005231804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97913545,0.00003158137,0.0005088005,0.000030511215,0.0017557726,0.00082801905,0.0001510859,0.0000610972,0.017497703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839185,0.000020165706,0.0037711405,0.00003840746,0.00032077206,0.000011192991,0.000317498,0.00002215677,0.011580202],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706656,0.00041494117,0.00047728606,0.0005104374,0.001173549,0.00035723636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809,0.00008200436,0.000551408,0.0004585306,0.0006205756,0.00019746684],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052297,0.0002818819,0.00032379426,0.0005477248,0.0012273628,0.00010282263,0.0016393767,0.00030054184,0.0000090371395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043079202,0.00026433982,0.000110505935,0.00092472625,0.00047935045,0.0005214222,0.00014903452,0.0003744871,0.000007983468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013715307,0.0013733393,0.4899813,0.00012486192,0.00046409701,0.00023143821,0.39556113,0.058546793,0.0019533916,0.048828796,0.00052123406,0.0010421039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001041424,0.0005102132,0.93109316,0.00029241282,0.00022026892,0.0000035801095,0.047605697,0.0015552187,0.000082098304,0.0003418308,0.016567683,0.0006864374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018964623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009155455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44111183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089789636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024884448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006900771","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/tx2vh","title":"The Effects of Paternity Leave on Parents’ Earnings Trajectories and Earnings Inequality","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Parental leave; Inequality; Demographic economics; Maternity leave; Labour economics; Economics; Family Leave; Work (physics); Institution; Sociology; National Longitudinal Surveys","score_opus":0.014652246203025498,"score_gpt":0.2670440776883223,"score_spread":0.25239183148529676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006900771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98893136,0.00003343561,0.00004941175,0.000105005434,0.0004979782,0.0002407189,0.000002306874,0.00004291054,0.010096877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956438,0.00022548917,0.000020511034,0.00008474817,0.000047094123,0.0000050770414,0.0000017220552,0.000006640208,0.0039649103],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987801,0.00031791744,0.00015091381,0.00017529035,0.0003314848,0.0002443122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873906,0.0008424124,0.00010845679,0.00015575076,0.000084565705,0.000069772694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007668716,0.00009613709,0.00015513938,0.00002148433,0.0003577878,0.000056008696,0.00016546728,0.0000842899,0.000021241785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055563217,0.000063602645,0.000042356784,0.00012840475,0.00024260371,0.00008404428,0.00004309164,0.00015620158,0.000019796913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015317215,0.000022664552,0.96463454,0.00004108686,0.000013337936,3.4080554e-7,0.02705462,0.0000021222231,0.00025157005,0.007151047,0.000042423897,0.00077090674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002374118,0.00017049623,0.9786469,0.000018980918,0.000007767243,6.922748e-8,0.017661331,0.000018719604,0.00021356165,0.00052291993,0.0024083117,0.00009354914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050826543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010084449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01401232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030231957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054637574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7683487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008128014","doi":"10.29173/cjfy29535","title":"GSS 2011 Linked with TIFF: Exploring the Cost of Child Care in Canada and the Use of the Child Care Expense Deduction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Family and Youth / Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la Jeunesse","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Indigenous; Family medicine; Descriptive statistics; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.031499200801877056,"score_gpt":0.22266601690019222,"score_spread":0.19116681609831515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008128014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98946357,0.0048954524,0.0000254845,0.00401683,0.00045606343,0.0002595992,0.00015260713,0.0000018698851,0.00072852813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99579376,0.0021216294,0.000045059565,0.0017964905,0.0002029655,0.0000040925133,0.0000023807688,0.000022015893,0.0000116069705],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748445,0.0009578823,0.000503058,0.00014853875,0.0003971369,0.0005089651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977489,0.00027842043,0.00047691778,0.00016970969,0.00047773882,0.0008482833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009553861,0.00019574125,0.00038789434,0.0001436276,0.0010204745,0.00015328678,0.0004980062,0.0000996591,0.0000032547812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003985799,0.00011747162,0.00009937821,0.00038787612,0.0007017383,0.0003075589,0.000030306574,0.0010389005,4.4770946e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023969148,0.000007936037,0.32565883,0.000051418105,0.00011009929,0.00027585292,0.6629538,0.0072228806,0.000008861811,0.0016950547,0.00030011064,0.0014754381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012227208,0.000071424874,0.338091,0.00022588622,0.00008949366,0.0003919413,0.65542406,0.00005454515,0.0000087785065,0.00003850957,0.0042414973,0.00014013477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9758663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99816144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022295099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008184108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012911969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009467649","doi":"","title":"Reflections on Young Fatherhood: In the Words of Young Fathers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Education and Early Childhood Development","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Gender studies; Developmental psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07861843699232039,"score_gpt":0.3643608535904524,"score_spread":0.285742416598132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009467649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37489483,0.000025301242,0.00046344395,0.0007518662,0.000392628,0.00012350838,0.0000022300712,0.000027125448,0.6233191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994244,0.000045517034,0.0002743038,0.00029779828,0.00009398188,0.000009297706,0.000001265545,0.0000060757666,0.005027799],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896944,0.00019901336,0.000138168,0.000118584394,0.0003698117,0.00020500903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959534,0.000063916035,0.000041765208,0.00017542504,0.00006943185,0.000054130986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009787603,0.00006629859,0.00008757473,0.00006856678,0.00014584686,0.000034769502,0.00027091554,0.00007347709,0.000029487966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001187048,0.000045676385,0.000041845462,0.0005541307,0.00012209006,0.00007944956,0.00001292011,0.000119682576,0.00002007305],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015228021,0.0002103883,0.1303695,0.000002457071,0.000015814727,0.0000026795299,0.55601984,0.0002211129,0.00010321105,0.30988184,0.0024681382,0.00068976847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035485785,0.00011510781,0.054712232,0.000009301637,0.000011363291,0.0000011728034,0.91943383,0.00014819145,0.000009545611,0.016070845,0.008988589,0.00014495257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012625714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07910032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6193491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098359495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014925397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011685171","doi":"10.1017/s1474746420000147","title":"The Learning, Earning and Parenting (LEAP) Program of Ontario Works Two Decades On: A Descriptive Cohort Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohort; Scholarship; Welfare; Social assistance; Psychology; Social Welfare; Social capital; Demography; Economic growth; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.041124846395304476,"score_gpt":0.33660712559374784,"score_spread":0.2954822791984434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011685171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98949796,0.00012332333,0.000034135075,0.0010995765,0.00007400609,0.00057671097,0.0000020011184,0.0000725241,0.008519782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977339,0.00028910846,0.00013396039,0.00034600592,0.0007449974,0.00003215248,0.0000020592984,0.0000124032595,0.000705436],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984659,0.00031664522,0.00020484348,0.00026288728,0.00034901407,0.00040069633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940044,0.00015967526,0.00015539362,0.000053592972,0.000096102965,0.0001348057],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008976545,0.00013827623,0.00023433763,0.000012150937,0.00305997,0.00024333436,0.00014582601,0.00012914883,0.000004417628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030306203,0.00011653727,0.00012425383,0.00033523663,0.00071320083,0.000101949074,0.000098918325,0.00054756063,7.0460624e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009273219,0.00004856233,0.45048788,0.0000050234758,0.00009040207,3.6055255e-7,0.5384037,0.0000068282893,0.000002926497,0.0046411445,0.00011630193,0.0061875996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037961607,0.00017638625,0.536812,0.000009945077,0.000044878492,8.379303e-8,0.4554445,0.0001879419,4.797123e-7,0.00053649297,0.006287487,0.0001201745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060160294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03456536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0863241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016923124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054593745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016572391","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.105643","title":"Loss Aversion and the Welfare Ranking of Policy Interventions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Econometrics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Narodowym Centrum Nauki; Narodowe Centrum Nauki; University of South China; Compute Canada; University of Chicago; Midwestern State University; University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Southern California","keywords":"Economics; Econometrics; Loss aversion; Ranking (information retrieval); Resampling; Welfare; Counterfactual thinking; Nonparametric statistics; Stochastic dominance; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.12837156289190385,"score_gpt":0.3245595074862373,"score_spread":0.19618794459433345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016572391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8954093,0.01018872,0.010993644,0.05562354,0.0040515624,0.0005342148,0.000170764,0.000017858281,0.023010386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98893213,0.009715587,0.0005560652,0.00014099573,0.00053946435,8.14887e-7,0.0000026545424,0.000008655187,0.00010360842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857974,0.00018169868,0.00069757144,0.00012429607,0.0002676867,0.00014899064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976997,0.00035167855,0.0013633834,0.0001369464,0.00032274734,0.00012558176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018893519,0.000108504326,0.00046300862,0.000917309,0.00023850439,0.00012264843,0.0005480338,0.00017313521,0.000051346593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020612555,0.00008424112,0.00050907803,0.0009201497,0.00032234326,0.0001231654,0.00035452266,0.0005559846,0.0000013923751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002968539,0.00036894946,0.15773286,0.0017140929,0.0014706738,0.000046836583,0.14479809,0.0037635062,0.0000038409394,0.6662574,0.0014865731,0.022060372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01045391,0.0006260652,0.37816894,0.0017570836,0.0016530121,0.000060546125,0.19127752,0.0030836863,0.000008179269,0.3018777,0.1097825,0.001250862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055656093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000797914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36437964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020865322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038817842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34352532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017325309","doi":"10.1111/iere.12626","title":"SPOUSES, CHILDREN, AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Spouse; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Business; Family business; Labour economics; Economics; Marketing; Finance; Sociology","score_opus":0.030809412298335396,"score_gpt":0.30912168886919994,"score_spread":0.27831227657086455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017325309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8638079,0.028036233,0.000021215712,0.019092495,0.0026131487,0.0005446971,0.00013519979,0.00024101693,0.0855081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40740356,0.58394563,0.00005565092,0.0023936841,0.0005296075,0.00002012616,0.000103398306,0.000013143769,0.005535227],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999353,0.000050285867,0.00018424256,0.0001865061,0.00009127708,0.00013468217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996768,0.00006612898,0.00006853704,0.00010016768,0.00002421877,0.00006410297],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004636606,0.00006387479,0.00012207724,0.000048577127,0.00008086926,0.00005370483,0.0002393962,0.000030191115,0.00047341827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009786564,0.00006579227,0.000052117255,0.000060744595,0.000065917215,0.0001171385,0.000049501523,0.00004825249,0.00090148917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002780065,0.000021773867,0.65114665,0.0000901776,0.000114819355,0.0000064622277,0.0012671078,0.000041955387,0.0000032712346,0.21924515,0.06374797,0.06431188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015380877,0.0000059198082,0.42975634,0.00022853349,0.000019886515,0.0000062493837,0.00016699037,0.000110793764,6.658331e-7,0.005073985,0.56431615,0.00016066222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048921304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000357317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5559094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080254205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007400829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3019055820","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.4817","title":"Inégalités et justice fiscale : le Canada devrait-il imposer les successions ?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.015887689125951707,"score_gpt":0.2706551766413588,"score_spread":0.25476748751540707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3019055820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52548254,0.0033722369,0.0013023493,0.25294587,0.008927178,0.00076086196,0.0005446545,0.0001528104,0.20651151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8784279,0.0011951246,0.00096334255,0.029922476,0.0005588442,0.000049890692,0.00010243498,0.00006681826,0.088713154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548227,0.0013508123,0.00057230477,0.00068416336,0.0007366442,0.001173828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725467,0.0006636627,0.00026016132,0.0005775172,0.0006259435,0.0006180382],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017768512,0.00041774695,0.00046130543,0.00011282249,0.0007709917,0.00029941965,0.00091637427,0.0008918533,0.00074688013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061665254,0.00043919077,0.00016033341,0.00093639916,0.0003661853,0.001057767,0.00025245608,0.001292638,0.00009247521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009984054,0.00017335895,0.059319373,0.00024268277,0.000056891506,0.000023049366,0.0055836765,0.00027020325,0.00014289899,0.88726974,0.04611758,0.0007905575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050026906,0.00006726238,0.06689523,0.00015775903,0.00009703004,0.000012529273,0.030042656,0.0010557418,0.00003504886,0.01758535,0.88275003,0.00080107077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9309243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9777181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8696844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007436462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01319707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021156423","doi":"10.3386/w14624","title":"Do Child Tax Benefits Affect the Wellbeing of Children? Evidence from Canadian Child Benefit Expansions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Centre for Biological Sciences; McGill University","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.14763785091914364,"score_gpt":0.4167271872725469,"score_spread":0.26908933635340326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021156423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86622125,0.0050389403,0.0000045703687,0.0058195293,0.0006608078,0.001300192,0.001581003,0.000018942823,0.119354784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98316586,0.014840491,0.00016570983,0.00007906745,0.001002848,0.00007254693,0.0003466671,0.000032990545,0.0002938481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577427,0.000505454,0.00067468244,0.0007757926,0.0015336323,0.0007361513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955186,0.0020253055,0.00036632616,0.0007153957,0.0010123315,0.00036203495],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038008494,0.00027502232,0.0005021181,0.00075977045,0.001568181,0.00014561172,0.002119229,0.0005841899,0.00027247317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014442893,0.00025735854,0.00029910984,0.00039141905,0.00094823993,0.00021506728,0.0005421823,0.0014826821,0.00005264124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051746363,0.00016293321,0.22978625,0.00006299375,0.00064127275,0.0000037737416,0.019287234,0.0956679,0.000025014382,0.6457915,0.006573859,0.0019455887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045207454,0.00006951603,0.81944096,0.001241176,0.00005010423,0.0000055232285,0.0030558016,0.0016312574,0.00007642065,0.17261277,0.00077775423,0.0005866313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.752433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6239198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58965474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013878397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004779196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022135611","doi":"10.3386/w21101","title":"Child Cash Benefits and Family Expenditures: Evidence from the National Child Benefit","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cash; Economics; Public economics; Monetary economics; Finance","score_opus":0.3585917060251695,"score_gpt":0.4833394898775565,"score_spread":0.124747783852387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022135611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034728043,0.033105318,0.0000017899009,0.00561184,0.0014313586,0.0009975606,0.001952666,0.000033101183,0.92213833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282134,0.058381643,0.00013798273,0.00034052882,0.0075046825,0.00014224718,0.00090857723,0.00006438855,0.0043065334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908084,0.00039276743,0.0007235154,0.0008137923,0.0066744117,0.0005870715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98997545,0.0034142728,0.00041120636,0.0003176747,0.0056064064,0.00027496275],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014488379,0.00029767986,0.0004937039,0.00043408386,0.0012183016,0.00030922235,0.0013290262,0.00068118435,0.00023481199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005945139,0.00026010076,0.00016985784,0.00024149423,0.00095985894,0.00042746915,0.0003710656,0.0011747066,0.000087221946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008014469,0.00014035229,0.023599505,0.00006575567,0.0005181783,0.0000044382655,0.007478904,0.0020161313,0.00000800557,0.5262342,0.4368068,0.0030475624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009232614,0.0001306374,0.20646983,0.0012713138,0.00006881811,0.00002642766,0.008871147,0.00046093608,0.0000065491013,0.41513142,0.36572453,0.00091510965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05208585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030309405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9178318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032887748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010187108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022831647","doi":"10.1007/s11150-018-9425-1","title":"Are time and money equally substitutable for all commodity groups in the household’s domestic production?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Elasticity of substitution; Commodity; Consumption (sociology); Production (economics); Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.06869059926659916,"score_gpt":0.29083101718032867,"score_spread":0.22214041791372952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022831647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846644,0.009619176,0.00001536507,0.0024998665,0.0004705349,0.001367271,0.00022926388,0.000019115438,0.0011150109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564596,0.041466553,0.00032085512,0.0013436648,0.00023120527,0.00003568948,0.000005996747,0.00002052766,0.00011591179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872875,0.00020311684,0.0004793443,0.0002372578,0.000101732636,0.00024978223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848896,0.00022615712,0.00058236497,0.000568453,0.000087532186,0.000046537818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025945986,0.00013411217,0.00044071767,0.000040264527,0.00024889465,0.000031656004,0.00070422346,0.00007619993,0.000004445186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050666893,0.000093799936,0.00012985327,0.00017847618,0.00055321865,0.00017366966,0.00008819912,0.00010860804,0.0000025033214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003641761,0.003404548,0.28971168,0.029393202,0.0010859261,0.0000059289596,0.04991479,0.009813986,0.00060358783,0.5073562,0.10002071,0.008325211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004239922,0.0007750835,0.40539238,0.0135580525,0.0018063929,0.000053660882,0.010342952,0.0036317639,0.00033734954,0.102683485,0.45442036,0.0027586017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037468606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029414133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40467277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007217718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010992998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38250506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023324556","doi":"10.3386/w11998","title":"Short, Medium, and Long Term Consequences of Poor Infant Health: An Analysis using Siblings and Twins","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Environmental health; Medicine; Physics","score_opus":0.3190577689452673,"score_gpt":0.5274265649931608,"score_spread":0.2083687960478935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023324556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687552,0.002696327,0.000023328772,0.00048846623,0.00019545534,0.00046911222,0.00034360387,0.000010622614,0.027017912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99248874,0.0059912573,0.00033846239,0.000016746108,0.00036738082,0.000009269206,0.00035601243,0.00001570135,0.00041645448],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961556,0.00037562256,0.0008517195,0.00052069826,0.0016707763,0.00042559244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968031,0.000694916,0.00044162103,0.0001755854,0.0016551223,0.00022966994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008329147,0.00017067944,0.00074424857,0.0017589707,0.0004218616,0.00012007721,0.0003327958,0.00035968926,0.00004012734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005483597,0.00017707674,0.000121469704,0.00061046606,0.0019084672,0.00025945192,0.00010609334,0.0003755283,4.4146108e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017648526,0.00008437313,0.9699242,0.0002676587,0.00050983374,0.0000040813093,0.002557253,0.000619263,0.00015147326,0.024325864,0.00036391636,0.0011744328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047552586,0.00025495005,0.94216174,0.0002460207,0.00032468524,0.000017356506,0.008492329,0.0048862123,0.00005555049,0.04144786,0.0010144144,0.0006233648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08728323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06761588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027762473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010198774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0094747925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99614054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023607340","doi":"10.1093/ej/ueab099","title":"Inefficient Collective Households: Cooperation and Consumption","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inefficiency; Consumption (sociology); Exploit; Liberian dollar; Microeconomics; Economics; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Production (economics); Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.030451763201544454,"score_gpt":0.26429619702969254,"score_spread":0.23384443382814807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023607340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99372935,0.00023261514,0.0003284378,0.0009130509,0.00089556986,0.00012216423,0.000010724213,0.000013247867,0.0037548325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974506,0.00048237373,0.000023427418,0.0002903202,0.00022691724,0.00000729062,0.0000012632698,0.000005179964,0.0015126627],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993095,0.0002593218,0.00012798613,0.00007964451,0.00008371181,0.00013987573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997125,0.00006974135,0.000089147106,0.000054674983,0.000021795504,0.000052109688],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011861373,0.000045172572,0.00006578214,0.00003395888,0.0025043543,0.00013907222,0.00013042192,0.000018031913,0.0003065662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019018542,0.000038288792,0.00002261491,0.00005074442,0.00012230838,0.00009012011,0.000044718527,0.00019702487,0.000014952187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017847621,0.00015663235,0.23897538,0.000006450161,0.00019832823,0.000013063329,0.3530475,0.22639586,0.00039535164,0.1474159,0.027894203,0.0053228643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041578608,0.0005959022,0.42655814,0.00001527767,0.00015002025,0.0004549473,0.28206864,0.07662842,0.000025721867,0.023349166,0.18511704,0.0008788838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018297294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004449722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18758275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078300596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047090207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99879426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023686767","doi":"10.3386/w19546","title":"Affirmative Action: One Size Does Not Fit All","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pennsylvania State University; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; York University; Yale University","keywords":"Affirmative action; Action (physics); Mathematics; Statistics; Political science; Physics; Law","score_opus":0.3963263960294268,"score_gpt":0.5108460063598309,"score_spread":0.11451961033040409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023686767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4351212,0.00016431573,0.00002567923,0.017786868,0.002041236,0.0015391799,0.000408367,0.00006912575,0.54284406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97801596,0.0015248854,0.000997784,0.00014541995,0.0013799331,0.00017713777,0.00012138276,0.000023140685,0.017614385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963997,0.00057719776,0.00053064205,0.0005492272,0.0014177919,0.0005254193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951165,0.0023726036,0.000297724,0.00032305176,0.001692435,0.00019771974],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00398039,0.00019642152,0.00040072785,0.00035019426,0.00038320353,0.00023586846,0.00096050114,0.0005793542,0.002281964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013784937,0.0001850982,0.00017697226,0.00014154043,0.00074147637,0.00029672866,0.0005094748,0.0010695573,0.00042199387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004976423,0.00020451864,0.0013909037,0.00014426142,0.00035887182,9.581005e-7,0.009609595,0.0022112275,0.00025438474,0.96919465,0.015784932,0.00079592236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038475686,0.000042998166,0.0107384585,0.00006298673,0.000016510621,3.479869e-7,0.0072796624,0.0018974732,0.00016664287,0.9653787,0.013697194,0.00033429393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011421334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004158816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5428947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017220048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026216423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025077097","doi":"10.3386/w11626","title":"Distributional Impacts of the Self-Sufficiency Project","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stanford Diabetes Research Center","keywords":"Environmental science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2006519979805222,"score_gpt":0.49273217407476405,"score_spread":0.29208017609424186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025077097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5379143,0.00037281011,0.000017743108,0.0032385811,0.00083168515,0.0013173122,0.0009771695,0.000029122604,0.4553013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974105,0.00051988475,0.00030797406,0.000019538062,0.00066402054,0.00004250318,0.0001504741,0.000011310586,0.0008738057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650425,0.0005012916,0.00053745013,0.00037937393,0.0016228063,0.00045481048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708694,0.00069426245,0.00033853718,0.0003270429,0.001465811,0.00008740962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00518002,0.00014332701,0.00027336425,0.0003097457,0.00041238763,0.00006923458,0.0013163167,0.0003727267,0.00014563084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011577135,0.00012180192,0.00022971416,0.00035265385,0.0008553781,0.00010973557,0.00059086457,0.0007605816,0.000021659984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013301276,0.00021105999,0.01984956,0.00006273735,0.00007086642,1.6979355e-7,0.0027247625,0.00095949706,0.000041712894,0.97073305,0.0052285646,0.0001047408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071417977,0.00009722844,0.17805879,0.00016433735,0.00003474869,0.0000021548815,0.004836273,0.005396838,0.00012752364,0.79222316,0.017877366,0.0004674092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005966547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019730383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45949623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019266984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014301655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99128634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025198052","doi":"10.3386/w7667","title":"Medicaid Expansions and Welfare Contractions: Offsetting Effects on Prenatal Care and Infant Health?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Medicaid; Prenatal care; Welfare; Demographic economics; Generosity; Welfare reform; Health care; Demography; Medicine; Labour economics; Business; Economics; Environmental health; Economic growth; Population; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10637396768436215,"score_gpt":0.46834461354953105,"score_spread":0.3619706458651689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025198052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8277106,0.007493986,0.000006544386,0.018076623,0.0008310899,0.002211213,0.00059198303,0.000054905064,0.14302304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923745,0.0062565203,0.00023000043,0.00011191436,0.00043272626,0.0001168504,0.00028274494,0.000015691558,0.00017904231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734825,0.0005338839,0.00039825263,0.0005146064,0.0008111274,0.00039387032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997388,0.0015792481,0.00017226826,0.00018934022,0.00041067088,0.0002604862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022264412,0.00015649297,0.00034090303,0.00044783155,0.00096520485,0.00011434543,0.00026571116,0.000358545,0.00008596419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008249352,0.0001639704,0.00006206296,0.00009933677,0.0005001443,0.00012038142,0.00020892375,0.00091991347,0.000008341096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001485585,0.00014966635,0.013930367,0.0015448888,0.00024997717,0.000008479228,0.044373162,0.0014183726,0.000016809896,0.87740344,0.004648092,0.056108173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005082793,0.0012571649,0.1628853,0.003631259,0.00007490137,0.000019690651,0.12636745,0.005330746,0.000084172636,0.6407252,0.05293371,0.0016076239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010776676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031671475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23667827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007447367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002123838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025674944","doi":"10.3386/w8962","title":"Estimating Price Elasticities When there is Smuggling: The Sensitivity of Smoking to Price in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sensitivity (control systems); Econometrics; Economics; Agricultural economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.2000775596759096,"score_gpt":0.42631023931212425,"score_spread":0.22623267963621466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025674944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84228045,0.00020949716,0.0003357795,0.0034916701,0.00055261917,0.0007649822,0.00023894174,0.000008950903,0.1521171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976084,0.00007762101,0.0012073184,0.00009874766,0.00028337375,0.000032659897,0.000013845404,0.000015032908,0.0006629637],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671435,0.00066197594,0.00053669413,0.0003810918,0.0012451572,0.00046072682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946881,0.0037675165,0.0002767843,0.00025162296,0.00091982714,0.00009614491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006577194,0.00014601459,0.00033580675,0.0002971987,0.0002813851,0.00007619184,0.00064359396,0.00018413241,0.00019436346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021853473,0.00013909866,0.00006736583,0.0002338577,0.00026730413,0.00008409658,0.00044636792,0.0007828561,0.000005305346],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000414227,0.000110329056,0.13189252,0.00046542028,0.0002418143,0.000010278484,0.081337325,0.4987435,0.00007075409,0.2781791,0.007244004,0.0016635183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044592418,0.000045046,0.09909644,0.0005932815,0.000019569203,0.0000019266852,0.049152028,0.38581523,0.00008819414,0.46250895,0.0016290657,0.0006043695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92728525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8751961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18432982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003311242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0079391105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99768496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025970982","doi":"","title":"Household Responses to Public Home Care Programs","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Business; Home health; Survey data collection; Public economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.08395131795940067,"score_gpt":0.3502214499706355,"score_spread":0.26627013201123484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025970982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8480128,0.00031898494,0.000005291303,0.0013147467,0.0010179288,0.0016986874,0.00014513405,0.00019001201,0.1472964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698004,0.018487848,0.000826395,0.00022210243,0.0007366964,0.0006025513,0.00012616754,0.000114044546,0.009083753],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941007,0.0010949319,0.00066418963,0.001361842,0.0007874218,0.001990912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669313,0.00048857526,0.00015970255,0.001390862,0.00045030564,0.00081742683],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036884192,0.0004054476,0.00063171156,0.0010435259,0.00074869185,0.000983571,0.0019826489,0.0009384696,0.00005813584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011524854,0.00047233023,0.00025104827,0.0006979817,0.0007621354,0.00018697146,0.0015279757,0.0019349877,0.000031862215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001561371,0.00033516312,0.63447475,0.00019342665,0.00010678664,0.00012897537,0.038080182,0.0018074799,0.000011841339,0.004619495,0.00023917193,0.3198466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092396,0.00034470073,0.1764825,0.0003454749,0.000020474934,0.000006424368,0.1742898,0.0003544714,0.0000040477125,0.0051200273,0.64030004,0.0018081024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002431646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024553731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64006084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031479103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036754594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026773567","doi":"","title":"Unexpected preferences: Exploring conservative attitudes toward healthcare spending","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Public relations; Public economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.08595223352086308,"score_gpt":0.27924777098285875,"score_spread":0.19329553746199568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026773567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601984,0.00008463224,0.000174959,0.00042905193,0.00077497796,0.0003617124,0.00003587695,0.00021754674,0.037722833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944539,0.0006126097,0.00028650998,0.00012218032,0.00009252545,0.0000015857937,0.000028690369,0.000016075259,0.0043859356],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981449,0.0002833407,0.00016207478,0.0004599478,0.00041047743,0.0005392227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899256,0.00016921075,0.000117614654,0.0002616881,0.00021146111,0.00024744315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021791004,0.00019569819,0.00027091184,0.0002856609,0.00051739434,0.00008091305,0.000571125,0.00016315494,0.00031245098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005324998,0.00022585243,0.00009886294,0.0011465051,0.00020091995,0.0008112084,0.00012399774,0.0002752396,0.00017312632],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029810974,0.000039473085,0.95673555,0.00004065936,0.00004588702,0.000028234133,0.0038351496,0.00003459248,0.0000069713183,0.038688995,0.000286293,0.0002283554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007375938,0.00010132312,0.16244291,0.000111722096,0.00003302106,2.3648123e-9,0.77132475,0.00005627846,0.000074007046,0.00071842707,0.06395321,0.00044675986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007368424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18249641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7942927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044250156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033708534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033452440","doi":"10.4236/jss.2020.86005","title":"Measuring the Effect of Child Benefit on Household Expenditures: Evidence from Canadian Households’ Survey Data","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Journal of Social Sciences","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Employment and Social Development Canada","funders":"Employment and Social Development Canada","keywords":"Receipt; Economics; Estimation; Household income; Demographic economics; Permanent income hypothesis; Child care; Low income; Labour economics; Finance; Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.20762782033404653,"score_gpt":0.3446614428888844,"score_spread":0.13703362255483786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033452440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9780848,0.000704307,0.00002438794,0.01023931,0.00079793064,0.00036487702,0.00036531404,0.000009146019,0.009409908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777776,0.00034212825,0.0000776212,0.0010177044,0.0007490319,0.000001540951,0.0000048858487,0.000010764136,0.000018539353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641657,0.0010037716,0.00043509158,0.00033473762,0.0013753051,0.00043453544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758196,0.0011640129,0.0005484718,0.0002491381,0.000113593414,0.0003428444],"candidate_categories":["sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008748578,0.00015764218,0.0004067958,0.000063913794,0.00237493,0.0006920098,0.006423638,0.00010596859,0.00006799182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018110862,0.00010326189,0.00009756328,0.0007059092,0.0007976853,0.0012048533,0.00034523275,0.00037236002,0.0000052903174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023857095,0.000048966365,0.89925206,0.000015430107,0.0001605547,0.000029929839,0.07783183,0.001350358,0.00015821094,0.0015722581,0.01448665,0.0048551993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060982356,0.00073813886,0.9606747,0.00030023334,0.000090878304,0.0000022583235,0.02672939,0.00008527778,0.00016866624,0.00035916414,0.009895395,0.00034608392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4003125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47402385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07371132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012441227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011527645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035320625","doi":"10.1920/wp.cem.2020.2620","title":"Intertemporal Collective Household Models: Identification in Short Panels with Unobserved Heterogeneity in Resource Shares","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Economic and Social Research Council; University of Bristol","keywords":"Econometrics; Economics; Monotonic function; Variable (mathematics); Identification (biology); Nonparametric statistics; Distribution (mathematics); Econometric model; Resource (disambiguation); Function (biology); Panel data; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1684251931384174,"score_gpt":0.31462393151997514,"score_spread":0.14619873838155775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035320625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98220026,0.00010565932,0.0047868975,0.0006003552,0.00025145354,0.0013261052,0.0001583608,0.00018950783,0.010381421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802375,0.00012253594,0.00039942568,0.00026037425,0.00008779149,0.00020134781,0.00018257466,0.000043201173,0.00067900354],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967502,0.0005668455,0.0006351909,0.000995794,0.000597489,0.00045447968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901235,0.00008543497,0.0001333114,0.00046871539,0.00013603456,0.00016417206],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091809075,0.00033425918,0.00052643794,0.0002739901,0.00015833677,0.0002948061,0.00082835415,0.0004760698,0.00001110401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086313856,0.00032685994,0.00011058366,0.00085566955,0.00019168484,0.00025470858,0.00044271458,0.0007636112,0.0000031490385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033659348,0.00048541612,0.7669904,0.00021425326,0.00015296362,0.0000928552,0.1289778,0.09716182,0.00021782893,0.0040158704,0.0009834339,0.0003707522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008699721,0.00010955797,0.82716817,0.00041393138,0.000060139097,0.0000011537423,0.0656139,0.08354562,0.00019712592,0.020349879,0.00040679585,0.0012637384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017677175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20583124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18815407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090265693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010046111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035958968","doi":"","title":"How Do Women in Male-dominated Apprenticeships Fare in the Labour Market?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apprenticeship; Workforce; Labour economics; Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.06145913372027416,"score_gpt":0.3626581858232281,"score_spread":0.30119905210295395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035958968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9175217,0.0020423352,0.0000010857309,0.01565322,0.00015826094,0.00068328535,0.000012836676,0.000023481009,0.063903786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95347965,0.005510095,0.00001697083,0.00029040335,0.000121640835,0.00015991981,0.000002704637,0.000015040676,0.040403564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941131,0.001970308,0.00030290315,0.0005124078,0.0014510036,0.001650265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972873,0.0016639848,0.000042761545,0.0004300714,0.00040771003,0.00016818635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076453974,0.00020511194,0.0004723772,0.00024047265,0.00060770626,0.00050025096,0.0008790308,0.00016192251,0.0005473471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029798385,0.00014415411,0.000079255595,0.0024699043,0.00131857,0.0005867736,0.0003199806,0.00080817944,0.00007058776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002722533,0.00025876815,0.72475904,0.00027287117,0.00018184372,0.00009492598,0.13615496,0.000008357415,0.000058327263,0.13235909,0.0035423243,0.0020372707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051605015,0.00010533809,0.39026514,0.000051715047,0.000005550463,0.0000011053837,0.5133899,0.000043716445,9.30507e-7,0.009988556,0.08544991,0.00018206844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081170944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020945385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37723497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004080128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018992872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036227800","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110054","title":"The Baycrest Quick-Response Caregiver Tool: A novel non-pharmacologic intervention for caregivers of family members with responsive behaviors","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Prosocial behavior; Context (archaeology); Compliance (psychology); Welfare; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Public economics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social psychology; Economics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.10142382141406686,"score_gpt":0.4284007830931863,"score_spread":0.32697696167911944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036227800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891296,0.00026628864,0.0031158673,0.005561636,0.00047743932,0.000919433,0.00003004636,0.000009294504,0.0004904203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974041,0.00037299198,0.0014958619,0.000112882015,0.00018452424,0.000035009492,0.0000010514402,0.000021644102,0.00037191546],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957095,0.0012175922,0.00067469256,0.00021690114,0.0016560549,0.00052528863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994175,0.0025825435,0.00057132606,0.00021258574,0.0021697143,0.0002888096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006454022,0.00014812757,0.00033906006,0.0002542768,0.0006675258,0.00013976339,0.00094404834,0.00012219478,0.000031773165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016581229,0.00009871361,0.00028218504,0.0009965538,0.00080611586,0.0002746759,0.00006227872,0.0005254562,0.0000038332414],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07049428,0.0017373196,0.03672877,0.0008384028,0.0015722155,0.00028293804,0.6847877,0.0013589603,0.12320011,0.004398714,0.06684353,0.007757066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008223123,0.006097405,0.09980762,0.0005311783,0.00022656612,0.000016308664,0.8638285,0.0013586192,0.00028006238,0.00054782466,0.018741421,0.0003413779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044522394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034775765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1790408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026887108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010464658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5134136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037164488","doi":"","title":"Gen Vaughan and the Maternal Gift Economy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.022264122519054828,"score_gpt":0.24483190325334506,"score_spread":0.22256778073429023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037164488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93062013,0.0009677382,0.000004454846,0.019786255,0.00027220388,0.00020105096,0.000027156379,0.000027846088,0.04809319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98719156,0.00054576,0.000020453303,0.00979185,0.00032805128,0.00003522674,8.148758e-7,0.0000079966185,0.0020782992],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991348,0.00007594892,0.00010747511,0.00016734567,0.00008164626,0.00043282442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932575,0.00007136412,0.000033257602,0.000078703175,0.000060384806,0.00043051428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002708731,0.00009473779,0.00017971513,0.000032239273,0.00081709697,0.000097219,0.00018894453,0.000036027708,0.000059010206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079797595,0.00007232041,0.000026186857,0.00012363227,0.0006186888,0.00007411341,0.000044526194,0.00007703899,0.000034033797],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016176773,0.0000033425456,0.0809337,0.000039508195,0.000332107,0.000029774992,0.653859,0.000008801204,0.0000017397169,0.25888887,0.00532091,0.0005660711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056412333,0.000026210993,0.009180747,0.0000042702372,0.000022002778,7.569037e-7,0.7227536,0.000044142,7.7506246e-7,0.019700162,0.24750757,0.00019565674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010897963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14782299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24218665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022845008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003044989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99568856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040857053","doi":"","title":"Household labor supply: Collective results for certain developed countries","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MPRA Paper","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Differential (mechanical device); Demographic economics; Order (exchange); Economics; Production (economics); Geography; Labour economics","score_opus":0.0420358039936432,"score_gpt":0.27956387808284056,"score_spread":0.23752807408919735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040857053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75458115,0.00095615105,0.0012355568,0.110836476,0.0017622373,0.0029468318,0.0043562483,0.00080315163,0.122522205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97255564,0.00038286627,0.0024456126,0.011523943,0.00057469256,0.00010069408,0.000053011267,0.000035999296,0.0123275705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985667,0.00011172358,0.00023542388,0.000336966,0.00031425644,0.00043496588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899286,0.0003592947,0.00007623152,0.00013033129,0.0002592412,0.00018204472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039077274,0.0001443299,0.0002031061,0.000031748797,0.0006859726,0.00012503244,0.0002571849,0.0001548152,0.000054334523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078173477,0.00013855592,0.000060491257,0.00051388674,0.00016799266,0.00019633236,0.000037691254,0.00011149777,0.0000384135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010962983,0.00012322106,0.10551591,0.00010114745,0.0001497049,0.000022470562,0.36036912,0.00027350328,0.0009422352,0.07821348,0.45270625,0.0004866473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012856935,0.00009119041,0.05059738,0.000007844516,0.0000255167,2.021371e-7,0.0210443,0.000094549265,0.000053026237,0.0010811267,0.92544955,0.00026964623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006888157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005336562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47274327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015306941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010624494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5650146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045115727","doi":"","title":"Hidden Treasures: A Letter to the Children of Mother's Love","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Genealogy; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.015325609124904613,"score_gpt":0.2445242499203177,"score_spread":0.2291986407954131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045115727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5976173,0.0013203918,0.05257458,0.07506455,0.001038067,0.0022590293,0.00038503538,0.00018967208,0.26955137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9636619,0.00057687727,0.0069864774,0.0009581652,0.00015613681,0.000030239002,0.00013659622,0.000049087463,0.02744453],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922429,0.0055835163,0.0004299915,0.00059751404,0.0007338074,0.00041232436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948278,0.00095112016,0.00042311414,0.002153171,0.0014779356,0.00016687695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006172107,0.00026943377,0.00036702226,0.00014337095,0.0003136164,0.0002885498,0.0022718585,0.0003540596,0.00017324714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011598384,0.00023269343,0.0002549027,0.00042802363,0.0003589086,0.000078013625,0.0008914536,0.0005661439,0.0002135732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032218482,0.0009935505,0.15851033,0.0001738567,0.00051169423,0.000001947975,0.6275759,0.00084475504,0.0007921514,0.136571,0.043136507,0.03085613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019204186,0.0000031765385,0.57855594,0.0037626037,0.00042565636,0.000005607304,0.015825083,0.0044294,0.0032869095,0.018270452,0.37091246,0.0026023167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015219413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018818099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6117508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001428744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005539462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049253316","doi":"10.1007/s42650-021-00048-w","title":"Changes and Stability in Marital Status: Evidence from Canadian Income Tax Returns","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Personal income tax; Demographic economics; Demography; Cohort; Life expectancy; Longitudinal sample; Marital status; Cohabitation; Common law; Economics; Psychology; Political science; Population; Sociology; Law; Medicine; Developmental psychology; State income tax","score_opus":0.10457797168336964,"score_gpt":0.33979703950274004,"score_spread":0.2352190678193704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049253316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.984481,0.0064106635,0.0000015241071,0.0049138987,0.0014740413,0.0007300422,0.0012437756,0.000021903337,0.00072317943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934505,0.0053574336,0.0002402595,0.00033732946,0.00026432067,0.00005950435,0.00024789557,0.000017788625,0.000024962741],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975808,0.000371632,0.00037192175,0.0006642009,0.00028107787,0.0007303466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984757,0.00021978853,0.00012701392,0.00028801314,0.00013741547,0.00075209833],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070815353,0.00024891828,0.00046436928,0.00045013736,0.0003319276,0.000101597,0.00026372293,0.0004100709,0.000027013577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019877895,0.00030358584,0.00003418403,0.0004761744,0.0002979928,0.00016823674,0.0001939308,0.00059112394,0.0000023697196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003614915,0.0000023708574,0.91730577,0.00007151362,0.000018801047,0.0000329049,0.081086755,0.000033634184,6.2014664e-7,0.00041229802,0.00009988912,0.0009318118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000921569,0.0000103052025,0.93447155,0.00030803523,0.00001625662,8.983361e-8,0.05215551,0.0003239699,1.10198634e-7,0.011710883,0.00062849896,0.0002826659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99894565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028931243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064536864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021956745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049768690","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3671894","title":"Narratives and the Economics of the Family","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Variety (cybernetics); Separate spheres; Romance; Focus (optics); Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Consumption (sociology); Gender studies; Political science; Social science; Literature; Art; Psychoanalysis; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.016553842964477497,"score_gpt":0.257290894606159,"score_spread":0.24073705164168152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049768690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9491396,0.012114173,0.001391366,0.023542896,0.0013421924,0.00044502327,0.000018351446,0.000016304313,0.011990105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933201,0.0650933,0.000052737305,0.00033039862,0.0006557844,0.000005185974,0.0000012172057,0.000015055758,0.0006453023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766433,0.00058338133,0.0003330567,0.00021218183,0.0002325845,0.00097445585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999014,0.00011627535,0.00047298995,0.00022289998,0.00010516191,0.00006862703],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026548002,0.00017013321,0.00031791758,0.000032506232,0.000716716,0.00013114794,0.00094046444,0.00018840574,0.0000040613545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013228403,0.00010002482,0.00023854301,0.0001107149,0.00089428225,0.00006354644,0.00032299376,0.0030535324,0.000001539162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003669481,0.000009273493,0.0022996233,0.000009358942,0.00023399758,1.8996444e-7,0.046144087,0.00017260914,0.000014565004,0.9493548,0.000064740816,0.0016600251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041617532,0.00002869119,0.003270252,0.000017858145,0.000049411166,0.0000060594375,0.14762558,0.00014593455,9.63904e-7,0.84561527,0.002710989,0.00011282843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008830795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077426992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10373958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045546034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007834643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3067451611","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3601259","title":"Incarceration of African American Men and the Impacts on Women and Children","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Political science; Psychology; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.00607459127843539,"score_gpt":0.2389664311709348,"score_spread":0.2328918398924994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3067451611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903501,0.00048573295,0.0001740893,0.004821799,0.000012467301,0.00011597754,0.0000025754618,0.000008435047,0.004028777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99139583,0.008009912,0.00001142978,0.0003309578,0.0001682014,0.0000017600878,6.830356e-7,0.0000061036394,0.000075145166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986302,0.00021046872,0.00012498982,0.000097921315,0.00021800981,0.0007183666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995942,0.00006210521,0.0001339621,0.000047484693,0.000036548026,0.00012569007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012162747,0.000068856745,0.00014289287,0.00003012825,0.0003266504,0.00005709303,0.00012324587,0.000023864657,0.0000033721212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112113026,0.00004691964,0.000024363466,0.00019563008,0.000378634,0.000078323836,0.000020662874,0.00045867922,6.0048836e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005055181,0.000047834998,0.14073327,0.000004930264,0.00031632397,6.8612434e-7,0.3506487,0.00004360213,0.00025077903,0.4629903,0.000121670964,0.04433636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002975303,0.001758551,0.37481135,0.000008841588,0.00005739385,0.000027099133,0.4432396,0.0008016806,0.000010083714,0.17564803,0.0003927848,0.00026928363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010648152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010082563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28734228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023001978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006991863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25123638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3076048030","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2856627","title":"The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Household Finances","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Economics; Income tax; Gross income; Tax credit; State income tax; Monetary economics; Labour economics; Tax reform; Public economics","score_opus":0.01493443103172024,"score_gpt":0.27461469641117126,"score_spread":0.259680265379451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3076048030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923073,0.00086504,0.00021368323,0.0022838656,0.00054183084,0.0001129262,0.000012727934,0.00001573547,0.003646889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823122,0.011670069,0.0000037670968,0.00003189474,0.00046368796,0.000002427251,1.01503325e-7,0.00001198801,0.0055038333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973639,0.00028844786,0.0002202675,0.000118661665,0.00047330058,0.001535392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990838,0.00025665568,0.0002652772,0.00023769673,0.00009132835,0.00006521535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002410405,0.00011353779,0.00013098425,0.000037327874,0.0010989872,0.00006234562,0.00079930446,0.00008221477,0.0000130663675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030292466,0.000045039018,0.00023506662,0.0002719972,0.00035301436,0.00013213365,0.00003716481,0.00071381935,0.000007952901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014601176,0.000119582866,0.3107552,0.000002261214,0.00028887656,0.0000015923358,0.0033962198,0.00021983206,0.0007338148,0.6525231,0.001876238,0.029937282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008287452,0.0006847028,0.46745172,0.000062861676,0.000026971451,0.000019506964,0.007948053,0.0000152069415,0.0000432915,0.5173732,0.00533581,0.00020989469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010533788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006193845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15669653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009322383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037263497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84526324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080302856","doi":"10.3386/w27717","title":"The EITC and Maternal Time Use: More Time Working and Less Time with Kids?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research; Sid W. Richardson Foundation; Smith Richardson Foundation","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Investment (military); Time allocation; Economics; Labour economics; Work time; Time-use survey; Work (physics); Production (economics); Demographic economics; Tax credit; Public economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2346360407588395,"score_gpt":0.45349876690547697,"score_spread":0.21886272614663746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080302856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2494691,0.0014875846,0.000003012931,0.004853024,0.00026855434,0.0009976525,0.00023660301,0.000045703502,0.74263877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7969542,0.011053438,0.00033302873,0.00009752976,0.0025129088,0.000074408985,0.00038467793,0.00011494608,0.18847486],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690884,0.00023685768,0.0003727938,0.00046551623,0.0015778111,0.0004381796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972019,0.0013409163,0.00023088478,0.00017043043,0.00086135726,0.00019448118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039586895,0.00018644938,0.00036632922,0.00020475863,0.000728654,0.0005144408,0.00045924922,0.00029169495,0.00016119718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051190273,0.00014686957,0.000054350847,0.00017739719,0.0012035524,0.00019082778,0.00021777103,0.00055626663,0.000092443515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087014976,0.00018650778,0.43465778,0.0005315585,0.0026470379,0.00009955286,0.011640771,0.00059643295,0.00053400925,0.31100795,0.21325769,0.02397057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029112003,0.0006476182,0.276001,0.0012865901,0.00023866928,0.00017755966,0.0061825407,0.03049092,0.000030858064,0.171977,0.50755876,0.0024972712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003741146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007609966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5541639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006143023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033715044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59891677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081731268","doi":"10.3386/w27744","title":"Cheap Thrills: the Price of Leisure and the Global Decline in Work Hours","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Economics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.2520585326410885,"score_gpt":0.49878331199093684,"score_spread":0.24672477934984832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081731268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04801751,0.0053783627,0.000008922332,0.018893458,0.00058895594,0.0011570726,0.00019032786,0.000010146963,0.92575526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98642933,0.011706284,0.00006189379,0.000052684005,0.0007478293,0.000036061512,0.000051803472,0.000012445904,0.00090165186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964336,0.0006331895,0.00056797155,0.0003187844,0.0017188042,0.00032766428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99599427,0.002305282,0.00031254537,0.0002065398,0.0011002421,0.000081112456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013088272,0.00012997346,0.0004367639,0.00012453899,0.0002256325,0.00006999529,0.0008467924,0.00031690707,0.00005547814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029649676,0.00008708791,0.00012335622,0.00061735,0.0016726594,0.00007273144,0.0002731496,0.0006392579,0.000008590165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016835173,0.000055722867,0.30960995,0.00007125504,0.00015391292,0.000001525797,0.0032733614,0.00065985473,5.398622e-7,0.6719212,0.012945423,0.00113893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017908532,0.00007350227,0.30358553,0.00021635297,0.00003766923,0.0000046629466,0.010797574,0.00048217326,0.0000017504339,0.6329902,0.049717635,0.00030214406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013485947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01241642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93841183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009684066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006560505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082855737","doi":"","title":"Determinants of Early Marriage and Construction of Gender Roles in South Sudan","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interdisciplinary Journal of Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Sociology; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.04054010251671306,"score_gpt":0.3446806007868047,"score_spread":0.3041404982700916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082855737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99442506,0.0029911823,0.000026638234,0.00004570445,0.00077741314,0.00012447634,0.000013916923,0.0000039044226,0.0015916935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982517,0.0009576803,0.0006356138,0.000010971356,0.00007040687,9.913347e-7,1.6985868e-7,0.00000828635,0.00006420317],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844325,0.0001554916,0.00070940563,0.00013840567,0.00034644804,0.00020697735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986876,0.00015614618,0.00062759273,0.00010796962,0.00036321816,0.00005746347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080188824,0.00012949624,0.00055529596,0.00027083736,0.000116481744,0.000014266972,0.000204078,0.00008179305,0.000004099767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064581734,0.00010690032,0.000113966096,0.00019950097,0.00060238055,0.0002611031,0.00025515756,0.00016531981,0.0000010823151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115711155,0.000041246647,0.8312476,0.000071557195,0.00009110788,0.000014779726,0.16615935,0.000015431358,0.00064305234,0.00038345944,0.00001555139,0.0012011082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004491855,0.0002690208,0.6213454,0.00020472039,0.00003045847,0.000008551502,0.373188,0.000016656884,0.00004377586,0.004362909,0.0000059243494,0.00007539714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045860244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032880215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20990224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060904837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000105949395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43592685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083141998","doi":"10.5430/rwe.v11n5p16","title":"Explaining the Gender-Gap in Economic Activity: A Cross-Country Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in World Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Economics; Demographic economics; Unemployment; Urbanization; Panel data; Labour economics; Econometrics; Economic growth; Psychology","score_opus":0.21740326387908615,"score_gpt":0.4356229888670196,"score_spread":0.21821972498793346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083141998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82511216,0.000083395586,0.000006717084,0.003040352,0.00013816096,0.0007629906,0.0000060649536,0.000026542028,0.17082363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99845004,0.00008172074,0.00001978549,0.0003418866,0.0004171266,0.0001642798,0.0000017553139,0.000018543973,0.0005048438],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971998,0.0008043036,0.0003157468,0.0005040474,0.0002749753,0.00090112706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998598,0.000792576,0.000058329257,0.0003008938,0.000043430384,0.00020678242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053348513,0.0001304952,0.0002450492,0.00031660378,0.00058219006,0.00050403486,0.00078206783,0.000069345406,0.00023701982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016217309,0.0001246861,0.00004577639,0.0009527638,0.00039966425,0.000537202,0.00026455868,0.000869375,0.00020669923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003616434,0.00010689213,0.9293084,0.00001319558,0.000017615695,0.000029755265,0.049231194,0.0009927122,0.0000032558628,0.018839521,0.00037089887,0.0010503816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016424902,0.000108733635,0.68274194,0.000019555608,0.00000387935,4.874824e-7,0.22909094,0.010189434,0.000005646593,0.010653888,0.06515296,0.0003900529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00817762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0932527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24656647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000790629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008224264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084725088","doi":"","title":"Long-Term Care Insurance: Information Frictions and Selection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Toulouse Capitole Publications (University Toulouse 1 Capitole)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université Laval; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Term (time); Actuarial science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Economics; Adverse selection; General equilibrium theory; Microeconomics; Business; Public economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.012599984907439002,"score_gpt":0.24102089880157254,"score_spread":0.22842091389413355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084725088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618902,0.0011624306,0.009380287,0.0022555531,0.0020886771,0.002225659,0.0011284257,0.0013547473,0.018513994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827547,0.007566497,0.0010621536,0.0002184516,0.0005587578,0.00005174235,0.001743723,0.000068103065,0.0059758374],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962689,0.00042241625,0.0005484116,0.0009695585,0.00091094285,0.0008797298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99548244,0.00014556678,0.00069913606,0.0010184705,0.0020916758,0.00056267926],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041782012,0.00060096243,0.0006206986,0.0015476387,0.0026581788,0.0009580312,0.0012475138,0.0013172221,0.00018357407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016662804,0.0008118544,0.00030240478,0.001637186,0.0005107545,0.0027640513,0.0007848935,0.0013464921,0.00031124035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000723815,0.00046741526,0.6622232,0.001066296,0.00050782337,0.000010586227,0.2289933,0.0037084722,0.00004990958,0.06951146,0.024414029,0.008975118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013708818,0.000081661856,0.8069536,0.0001499643,0.0003891639,0.000018424998,0.102043666,0.0012623074,0.000009084492,0.00069177174,0.085475355,0.0015541132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007431928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010224748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14473039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017351067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022090618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085418159","doi":"10.34989/swp-2020-36","title":"Child Skill Production: Accounting for Parental and Market-Based Time and Goods Investments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.13155380414314602,"score_gpt":0.42676683375679303,"score_spread":0.29521302961364704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085418159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86697197,0.0002570521,0.000009548384,0.01405327,0.00016273034,0.0008285703,0.00009211151,0.000021589643,0.11760314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980461,0.00007768702,0.00061522174,0.00021860634,0.00041544004,0.000025278869,0.000045311484,0.000007781275,0.000548563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901605,0.000089225185,0.00015711921,0.00025082607,0.00029455996,0.00019221788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993224,0.00028200998,0.000054036187,0.000047002926,0.00019122368,0.00010332452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001504346,0.000058456142,0.00010504993,0.00008981109,0.00037569948,0.000065275315,0.00011713423,0.00006273069,0.000071937335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068722456,0.000063289124,0.000024294492,0.00010957518,0.00030827016,0.00018031048,0.00004419991,0.00009909312,0.000006989647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033074568,0.00023145662,0.36333102,0.0002571643,0.00019414935,0.0000010055503,0.010251001,0.00057631533,0.0005994325,0.578459,0.041970987,0.0037977078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004882511,0.0005677416,0.51453257,0.0001287247,0.000043909902,0.0000048575716,0.01473044,0.115908116,0.00043896007,0.31511682,0.032781452,0.0008639194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002076472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009123504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26334217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014286506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003298297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28896147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087018321","doi":"10.1007/s11150-020-09508-9","title":"The gender gap in citations of articles published in two demographic economics journals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Gender gap; Economics; Demography; Demographic economics; Positive economics; Social science; Sociology","score_opus":0.11383839249101184,"score_gpt":0.31136142172821907,"score_spread":0.19752302923720721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087018321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96769387,0.022211133,0.000009715246,0.006829016,0.0001804495,0.0004205688,0.000043787975,0.0000056666727,0.0026058226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78768307,0.21121773,0.00017596128,0.00086311874,0.000034160068,0.0000071747263,8.4399517e-7,0.000010907985,0.000007014626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981833,0.00027199907,0.0010742694,0.00016310668,0.00007952511,0.00022781653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838674,0.00033837926,0.00076449115,0.0003511734,0.00008304785,0.000076150165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024313764,0.00010400545,0.00045605432,0.00009695381,0.000098879704,0.00004200506,0.0008308357,0.00004935385,0.000015714173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006623581,0.000077705095,0.00024632132,0.0005613638,0.00029919797,0.0002566508,0.00009523401,0.00017311006,9.36894e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023918336,0.00019668826,0.6689588,0.0013956276,0.00015510719,4.574566e-7,0.009882417,0.017342206,0.00009387508,0.29596314,0.0009437374,0.005044085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027980383,0.00010335774,0.66670144,0.0036557545,0.00030197893,0.0000030285248,0.025909323,0.0076580737,0.00024729216,0.27127802,0.0204343,0.00090939866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040965003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052741203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18900661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006286279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029242804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3168722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088817181","doi":"10.3386/w26334","title":"Marriage, Children, and Labor Supply: Beliefs and Outcomes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Spencer Foundation; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Endogeneity; Graduation (instrument); Panel data; Estimation; Economics; Longitudinal data; Survey data collection; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Sociology; Engineering; Management; Demography; Statistics","score_opus":0.12031581906637763,"score_gpt":0.4577941603897925,"score_spread":0.33747834132341487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088817181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9235304,0.0010814684,0.0000022118272,0.005032237,0.00048075063,0.0008517395,0.0006468988,0.000019218352,0.06835505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99030125,0.003857625,0.00031876718,0.00009177283,0.00038442516,0.00003125327,0.0002342127,0.000020003052,0.0047606705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771035,0.00029035867,0.00034843065,0.00053945015,0.00072746794,0.00038393744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802357,0.00090127497,0.00014146115,0.00024276195,0.00053646887,0.00015444301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032784787,0.00016793462,0.00038247788,0.00041417812,0.00028449052,0.00018464988,0.00046909656,0.00041778712,0.0001941125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056411617,0.00017343344,0.00007092145,0.000099105506,0.0006715373,0.00013406118,0.00063493906,0.0006361584,0.000041637824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007251419,0.000022705828,0.5866644,0.000032750733,0.00007686132,2.7228404e-7,0.0011528973,0.00012012368,0.000003673339,0.40942395,0.0022831403,0.00021200965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030751576,0.00001902281,0.68201953,0.000021835936,0.0000062253894,5.1287606e-7,0.00054849236,0.00017010055,0.0000019153676,0.31624138,0.0005295789,0.00013390354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075633763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020249786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09535516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034252484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001504418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092031673","doi":"10.1111/padr.12364","title":"A Stalled Revolution? Change in Women's Labor Force Participation during Child‐Rearing Years, Europe and the United States 1996–2016","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Population and Development Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Current Population Survey; European union; Population; Demography; General partnership; Political science; Geography; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04027018231441306,"score_gpt":0.29831016709677,"score_spread":0.25803998478235696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092031673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829785,0.012195289,0.00004342864,0.0039804084,0.000033370496,0.00061638746,0.0000020174864,0.000052464267,0.00009810831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.860561,0.1358985,0.0001735638,0.0031413746,0.00003691009,0.00008345731,0.00004857001,0.0000089356645,0.000047671092],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903756,0.00020514583,0.00026225136,0.00015430074,0.00015967552,0.00018107943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996914,0.000029369738,0.0000934175,0.000051344367,0.000044091677,0.00009037072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000585811,0.00007956881,0.00016768361,0.000043501033,0.00021829881,0.00004267339,0.000052687697,0.000025371222,0.000013303871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017393891,0.000061618506,0.000009830002,0.0004866755,0.000042217034,0.00013614216,0.000045646244,0.000065603606,0.0000036502888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007835395,0.00003898203,0.7468379,0.001418415,0.000034869336,0.000003855727,0.21145116,0.00004666322,0.0000032036041,0.010162619,0.00006388503,0.029860081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005183511,0.0000049606047,0.96779275,0.00042541057,0.000007634324,2.2533041e-7,0.0010412771,0.00040543018,1.1946254e-7,0.0000777669,0.029630123,0.00009594218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070513005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005177227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22095484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005650299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031990232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25127298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092050315","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v22i5.3046","title":"Contemporary Tax Issues Related to Farmers and Ranchers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Legislature; Business; Tax law; Ad valorem tax; Value-added tax; Direct tax; Tax reform; Tax avoidance; Indirect tax; Economic policy; Double taxation; Public economics; Economics; Finance; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.024440632356799743,"score_gpt":0.2460146040779571,"score_spread":0.22157397172115736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092050315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97823966,0.00051613,0.00013379937,0.009113348,0.00024088468,0.00011222169,0.000006132176,0.000009130347,0.011628721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994051,0.0032548762,0.00071844744,0.0016749352,0.00020477115,9.885381e-7,0.0000011960537,0.0000111775835,0.000082606755],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993425,0.000013040533,0.00031297692,0.00012782782,0.00006197144,0.00014171089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994,0.000029516214,0.00020120568,0.000043497115,0.00008668987,0.00023907672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003197955,0.000094133495,0.0002699783,0.000053307303,0.00014953724,0.00010795654,0.00010949458,0.00008834213,0.00001456345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028942584,0.0000899211,0.000028588756,0.00015561742,0.000113240836,0.0001841601,0.00003314208,0.00011295611,0.000004163484],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028422796,0.00029739735,0.22504237,0.0004212809,0.0010953252,0.00010290001,0.45035103,0.015666652,0.003679065,0.15544501,0.046713006,0.098343685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043472135,0.0002067007,0.12634908,0.000057136505,0.0001035192,0.000016415031,0.23001243,0.0011720342,0.000044594068,0.011977237,0.6248336,0.00088007725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012579828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027111193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5781206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029096629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014575804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3666876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095207334","doi":"10.2478/izajole-2020-0006","title":"Assortative preferences in choice of major","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IZA Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Assortative mating; Sorting; British Household Panel Survey; Economics; Information transmission; Econometrics; Field (mathematics); Demographic economics; Demography; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04416894227370551,"score_gpt":0.29961536209362594,"score_spread":0.25544641981992044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095207334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992982,0.0003210932,0.00007399396,0.0017538845,0.00037713622,0.00007370672,0.00004727482,0.0000045163215,0.004366426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99686337,0.0012896765,0.001020497,0.00047395122,0.0002887865,7.1315355e-7,0.0000010805078,0.000008053444,0.000053863387],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892527,0.000115199,0.000552511,0.00010635658,0.000117181764,0.0001834739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987492,0.00023016146,0.0005843241,0.00006095188,0.00022417429,0.00015118562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046901012,0.00008513044,0.0003132534,0.00008492849,0.000049064776,0.000035851623,0.00036832667,0.00008524497,0.00006860303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004076085,0.00008331313,0.00007330824,0.00024479773,0.00011759188,0.00032452223,0.00002130285,0.00019753884,0.0000050496315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066837354,0.00009840538,0.9029282,0.000025158284,0.000100856596,0.000008278614,0.06635713,0.0019457956,0.00017689297,0.026542814,0.00027143894,0.0014781969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022560942,0.00051807304,0.8660354,0.00007824708,0.00008013223,0.0000020368468,0.08847727,0.0008481767,0.00034353932,0.017910691,0.023037245,0.00041310966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043820916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004088517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036892805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087077955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053461856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33974108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097086640","doi":"","title":"How Do Gender Norms Affect Our Risk of HIV","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"York University Digital Library (York University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Social psychology; Psychology; Medicine; Communication; Virology","score_opus":0.012850158059065333,"score_gpt":0.17497644031881895,"score_spread":0.16212628225975362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097086640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6389302,0.00006546851,0.00089084514,0.00064922916,0.00028927138,0.00042680264,0.00074252684,0.00037278462,0.35763288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8721487,0.0002609761,0.0005690458,0.000040055267,0.0001035108,7.810162e-8,0.0000963269,0.000023503891,0.12675783],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808544,0.00024486886,0.00012716315,0.0004929884,0.0004479299,0.0006016219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986175,0.00013490963,0.00024966124,0.0004133714,0.0001054468,0.00047914393],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000071392555,0.0002841682,0.00034294082,0.0005431593,0.0007344554,0.0005322137,0.0012176826,0.00030695312,0.00014247575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039974966,0.00032526877,0.00033401223,0.001821732,0.00040784996,0.0056776316,0.00041447123,0.00031535275,0.0001698103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001123234,0.00030701543,0.834773,0.000052547508,0.0003231491,0.00014028847,0.0068822466,0.00013936302,0.000021918777,0.102805145,0.052717723,0.0017252832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001357362,0.00012710012,0.0878121,0.000040470208,0.0001620321,0.0000021558212,0.3906073,0.000070731134,0.000020315056,0.0021620821,0.5168237,0.0008146631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042607394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007360637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7469609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016240143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038008514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097241435","doi":"","title":"COVID-19: Child Care Tax Provisions in H.R. 7327 [July 24, 2020]","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Quarter (Canadian coin); Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); CARE Act; Family medicine; Business; Medicine; Political science; Economic growth; Health care; Economics; Geography; Disease; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.0650682534340254,"score_gpt":0.3716961047393923,"score_spread":0.3066278513053669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097241435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4555726,0.012959248,0.000046548255,0.32658347,0.0020526224,0.003962021,0.002258092,0.00057072483,0.19599466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752475,0.002514848,0.00079877896,0.01654687,0.0006862501,0.00011186377,0.00028735344,0.000077518955,0.003729018],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929204,0.0016706033,0.0007139874,0.0008763532,0.0026584868,0.0011601693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99456644,0.001655882,0.00022483333,0.0005118435,0.0007460654,0.00229494],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010077883,0.00032585085,0.00054853887,0.00038155346,0.0011842168,0.00026687683,0.0021229787,0.00040605615,0.0026777363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031561218,0.0003046204,0.00015340549,0.0034375729,0.00092550745,0.001539681,0.0010553157,0.0013874099,0.0001813587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023739792,0.0010169448,0.31682253,0.0043880735,0.0002295392,0.0013757024,0.19201815,0.001800777,0.0015488775,0.07048418,0.40267575,0.005265476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025885066,0.00028768697,0.02604672,0.0008796286,0.000018331823,0.000004560644,0.0860076,0.0017894314,0.0002968787,0.0052789,0.87611437,0.0006873875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022476863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002356537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5196749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013374844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006765112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3104470763","doi":"10.3386/w28057","title":"Asymmetric Demand Response when Prices Increase and Decrease: The Case of Child Healthcare","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Demand response; Economics; Health care; Monetary economics; Business; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Engineering; Economic growth","score_opus":0.20750206670220234,"score_gpt":0.4840892295600363,"score_spread":0.27658716285783397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3104470763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22067322,0.025417576,0.000014737114,0.037731066,0.00067596365,0.0027220473,0.0015989613,0.000041888474,0.71112454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98565155,0.011829554,0.0001613073,0.00012448321,0.00066252076,0.000049616363,0.0001288889,0.000028177416,0.0013639195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535036,0.0016177557,0.00071768905,0.000509748,0.0013817811,0.000422671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913392,0.005132819,0.00049416505,0.0003005691,0.0023098928,0.0004233429],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01825136,0.0001890625,0.0004949088,0.0008745608,0.0007471439,0.00009937386,0.0006019826,0.00041195008,0.000101907375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01458323,0.00016182907,0.00013686375,0.00063589134,0.0009588374,0.00014502394,0.0002516992,0.0007722639,0.0000096838885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017346293,0.00035093824,0.033508196,0.0016190218,0.0009270743,0.0003230162,0.015881764,0.00013011586,0.00001349738,0.81748044,0.11994806,0.008083236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026992506,0.001032625,0.10251752,0.00069251127,0.00025151472,0.0010609576,0.037716676,0.0019127012,0.000026797372,0.4844104,0.3663416,0.0013374364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07345384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015836148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7649783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010438839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013295055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107625538","doi":"10.3982/te3715","title":"Transferable utility and demand functions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Property (philosophy); Utility theory; Computer science; Microeconomics; Game theory","score_opus":0.0202644195528135,"score_gpt":0.23986344501008672,"score_spread":0.21959902545727322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107625538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85739255,0.000060988135,0.00847858,0.0062794215,0.0001348197,0.000114652954,0.000032504835,0.000059302834,0.12744717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976974,0.00045686885,0.00022237556,0.0013566917,0.00014603457,0.000003076342,0.0000041121275,0.000007549689,0.00010590239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993253,0.000079454294,0.00013691737,0.00019939218,0.000040760424,0.00021820897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948716,0.00012025927,0.000013620449,0.000086126,0.000021156604,0.00027170058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033216775,0.00007360671,0.00013403593,0.000010957224,0.0002805576,0.000062766136,0.0001057956,0.00008997211,0.0006262717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009253682,0.00007570355,0.00004005323,0.000060509275,0.0009174177,0.00008795378,0.000021448246,0.000111377965,0.00005092676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018657198,0.000013497436,0.0048051556,0.000005100178,0.00000922774,3.4326132e-7,0.0053783325,0.00002048284,0.0000067681635,0.98871356,0.0000960019,0.00093285315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008528786,0.00014785999,0.016662918,0.0000048448155,0.00008299997,0.0000015193774,0.023150489,0.03616052,0.00002470481,0.8741649,0.048295945,0.00045045558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044572756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000101134545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14030483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021669197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000080499136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6857236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107697208","doi":"10.3917/reco.716.0963","title":"It’s time to analyze Okun’s law and household welfare in terms of domestic production","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Learned Journals","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Economics; Production (economics); Mathematics; Philosophy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03496238325496705,"score_gpt":0.2443322186803769,"score_spread":0.20936983542540988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107697208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8258339,0.00056797307,0.000070190654,0.15382096,0.00057607854,0.0006147314,0.00008386906,0.000038174574,0.01839411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920828,0.0007222184,0.0005061468,0.0027742533,0.0005301017,0.000016892349,0.000006061657,0.000024337356,0.0033372298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986626,0.00016539346,0.00038843474,0.0004402377,0.000050822982,0.000292502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934,0.000057945366,0.00013347628,0.00019937403,0.000034634442,0.00023454463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035916947,0.00016752732,0.00039458156,0.00007030942,0.00010097346,0.000040330313,0.00019131904,0.00019078709,0.00009415373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015676075,0.00019672353,0.00006648469,0.00047052497,0.000264626,0.00021555959,0.00006890776,0.00017563172,0.000068997964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018204827,0.000584322,0.14870684,0.0024767856,0.00023417975,0.00010943184,0.12379366,0.032647796,0.003130821,0.6642558,0.005940504,0.017937802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016605346,0.001010743,0.1961395,0.0012563515,0.0003374526,0.000049994873,0.010103467,0.014524147,0.00026664237,0.01933411,0.75333893,0.0019781361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022210632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00486186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74739844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001731162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007059603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8022153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107842888","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3743131","title":"What is the Role of Firm-Specific Pay Policies on the Gender Earnings Gap in Canada?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Business; Labour economics; Gender pay gap; Demographic economics; Economics; Accounting; Wage","score_opus":0.01940180660000904,"score_gpt":0.24185006039874746,"score_spread":0.22244825379873842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107842888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93910646,0.006927197,0.00004499156,0.049442068,0.00026602956,0.00014984267,0.0000041364056,0.000007279025,0.004051974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701652,0.026305223,0.00000239764,0.0028688333,0.00027916147,0.000002485029,5.697137e-7,0.0000114618615,0.0003646956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743587,0.00029331984,0.00022861661,0.00013646921,0.0005763809,0.0013293567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993801,0.00017255996,0.00015471908,0.00013129863,0.00007546999,0.00008583853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012740281,0.000111802605,0.0001407661,0.000032842046,0.0005040524,0.000109256514,0.00059314363,0.00005096719,0.00007634974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067539884,0.000060381706,0.00007788879,0.00039576096,0.00012485763,0.00014372396,0.000031571417,0.0014836726,0.000007738926],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004871614,0.00004141366,0.18674783,0.0000041852577,0.00013488268,0.000003584869,0.19853523,0.0004917002,0.0002739917,0.6008306,0.0026893867,0.010198456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018453818,0.00007845307,0.035864584,0.000012935748,0.000011076872,0.000005523331,0.8143795,0.0001833366,0.000033123262,0.07920041,0.06991168,0.00013482329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40490082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8508508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6158443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010677556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071554226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108909065","doi":"","title":"Household responses to disability shocks: Spousal labor supply, caregiving, and disability insurance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Compute Canada; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Disability insurance; Counterfactual thinking; Social security; Value (mathematics); Economics; Health and Retirement Study; Disability benefits; Demographic economics; Self-insurance; Time allocation; Health insurance; Labour economics; Health care; Psychology; Medicine; Gerontology; Social psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.02872460044255641,"score_gpt":0.28284539751853116,"score_spread":0.25412079707597474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108909065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97512716,0.0013144253,0.00006671094,0.0057177967,0.0049526757,0.0019279189,0.0065020435,0.0006682562,0.0037229965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99479425,0.0006916244,0.0010607304,0.0009831436,0.0013460525,0.0002414465,0.000075466254,0.00010731711,0.0006999709],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929478,0.0013673557,0.0011665102,0.0024262662,0.000842545,0.0012494769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948215,0.0014143756,0.000470515,0.0017250712,0.00026685497,0.001301723],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020721115,0.0009430326,0.0014702614,0.00012956305,0.0010307236,0.0005039788,0.0014466197,0.0010196201,0.00034153237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027464172,0.0010588815,0.00043769006,0.0005380544,0.004698302,0.00046155488,0.0014115033,0.0015191433,0.000076498596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015663294,0.00025228952,0.97666717,0.00026638914,0.000096496944,0.00002135968,0.01774439,0.00005095779,0.000027933946,0.002168192,0.0021862274,0.0003619759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045575105,0.00009628683,0.9745862,0.00015237513,0.00007758108,0.000006753263,0.009404671,0.00003410134,0.000009357386,0.0021617496,0.011860808,0.0011543921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008408544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032217346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023808803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017144536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020470181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110902887","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdaa066","title":"Social Norms, Labour Market Opportunities, and the Marriage Gap Between Skilled and Unskilled Women","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Labour economics; Comparative statics; Marriage market; Gender gap; Panel data; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.08738181017222547,"score_gpt":0.3269885119460131,"score_spread":0.23960670177378762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110902887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52463037,0.3320164,0.0000026833666,0.10336129,0.00024914628,0.0013479625,0.00016705807,0.000040672905,0.038184423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25466362,0.7405928,0.000015367576,0.002997841,0.0003726595,0.000045415218,0.000002104646,0.000009199982,0.0013009978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857694,0.00051300117,0.00039448604,0.00017375211,0.00009973829,0.00024208605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986726,0.0008079333,0.00026195563,0.00012567683,0.000053751242,0.00007805955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026409284,0.0001450727,0.00075838965,0.000014625371,0.0006358637,0.000031748797,0.0002692821,0.000038288938,0.00011009151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038658277,0.00008314876,0.00007890759,0.000074253534,0.0012486455,0.00007057029,0.00022216956,0.00009565474,0.000004925274],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013339172,0.000027230875,0.015864888,0.0067103766,0.0025563978,0.0000034028722,0.39334324,6.8401e-7,9.187855e-7,0.48343566,0.071677685,0.026246132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032465416,0.000115412986,0.037865505,0.0008799028,0.0006904161,0.0000016889841,0.41742796,0.000033810542,4.4056424e-7,0.035634845,0.5035046,0.0005989353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014797835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000096956326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44780082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007100606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011713272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48906136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113837157","doi":"","title":"Increasing inequality in working time","year":2020,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia Política","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Working time; Inequality; Working hours; Distribution (mathematics); Labour economics; Economics; Phenomenon; Working poor; Economic growth; Development economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Work (physics); Poverty","score_opus":0.06224789547363417,"score_gpt":0.3113229893024844,"score_spread":0.24907509382885024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113837157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785082,0.0015311892,0.0003128973,0.006977839,0.00035681578,0.00080701004,0.0001576162,0.00020818223,0.011140283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907962,0.0004953627,0.0006982986,0.0057664863,0.0013882731,0.000021410831,0.000060168346,0.00010927747,0.000664506],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99336433,0.0017580247,0.0015114812,0.0012319647,0.00041589115,0.0017182983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965405,0.0010552742,0.0006456277,0.00061363814,0.00007954518,0.0010654312],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033016617,0.0006653812,0.0013141343,0.00014879857,0.0006817593,0.0012538441,0.001197079,0.00079410314,0.00094116357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013629461,0.00083780254,0.0005074512,0.001201622,0.0005605891,0.00049592997,0.0003877421,0.0011483597,0.0010254696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101953054,0.00019355357,0.89652526,0.0003745167,0.0001671794,0.000041307605,0.060378186,0.00014270282,0.0004234376,0.03570341,0.0042194193,0.0017290456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030995863,0.00022797787,0.8415155,0.0009856671,0.0003929822,0.000014569494,0.069057815,0.0348228,0.000014212594,0.0010394976,0.045748554,0.0030808463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013953019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002501909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055009793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016525837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014806074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114798992","doi":"","title":"Thinking Through the Gift Paradigm","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Ethnology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04384587585938319,"score_gpt":0.2824591960221171,"score_spread":0.23861332016273393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114798992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7219812,0.004062681,0.000084300955,0.09146531,0.0017405838,0.00056647725,0.00006561504,0.00019703685,0.17983678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679793,0.0007593367,0.00007515685,0.0296605,0.0005522248,0.000037269205,0.0000018005525,0.000013671363,0.0009207008],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851894,0.00010914714,0.00013935521,0.00022589714,0.00029509419,0.00071156066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992307,0.00013810516,0.00004587311,0.00015257213,0.000071946386,0.00036081637],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031587336,0.00013153232,0.00019483379,0.000026385274,0.0021158864,0.00011708562,0.0004783502,0.00005948771,0.00006813801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003073116,0.00010107779,0.000048582468,0.0004348986,0.00049267337,0.000132442,0.000055840494,0.00016346075,0.00008122328],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012716655,0.0000025383108,0.0043658414,0.00000892032,0.00009624126,0.000016269627,0.6806739,0.000024752833,6.50423e-7,0.30931884,0.0053912546,0.00009949739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074308526,0.000019414081,0.0010312154,0.000004189361,0.000011005487,2.2568358e-7,0.63336056,0.000009963315,2.181924e-7,0.05993712,0.3054241,0.00012767897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010092983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18515712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30003285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048050113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006421812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119111899","doi":"10.1057/s41302-020-00183-3","title":"Do Credit Unions Serve the Underserved?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eastern Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Financial services; Finance","score_opus":0.04297492997233288,"score_gpt":0.2796157600766622,"score_spread":0.23664083010432935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119111899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92191184,0.00063391187,0.0010574318,0.011401687,0.004444637,0.00006939026,0.000019408084,0.000025600775,0.060436085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98570675,0.00063235644,0.00013294126,0.000839679,0.0020869107,0.0000015400141,0.0000035174578,0.00001476067,0.010581538],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877137,0.00028312334,0.0002643053,0.00016390088,0.0001481388,0.00036916992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992598,0.000088313645,0.00014540575,0.00022215306,0.00008763433,0.00019668062],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008583853,0.000100545825,0.00013480357,0.0000360979,0.00095664005,0.00055043015,0.00043659622,0.00008131376,0.0011258802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004700755,0.00008353769,0.0001410626,0.00008495047,0.00014939328,0.0002835522,0.00007507546,0.00033312023,0.00035416454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014396164,0.00011700406,0.74087864,0.000009020808,0.00034162845,0.00013416346,0.049223334,0.0027344404,0.000037275906,0.18432201,0.015688367,0.0064997077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012268185,0.000051981577,0.1898244,0.000055146327,0.00009065338,0.0003395875,0.3713119,0.0022054699,0.000009715572,0.06364148,0.37070358,0.0005392767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003477405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008072493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55105424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025389736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076926197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120501030","doi":"10.1093/ser/mwaa050","title":"Exit, voice and loyalty in the family: findings from a basic income experiment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socio-Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Separation (statistics); Loyalty; Bargaining power; Vulnerability (computing); Power (physics); Demographic economics; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Microeconomics; Marketing","score_opus":0.04740824071571694,"score_gpt":0.3121542163045864,"score_spread":0.2647459755888695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120501030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86985904,0.10897932,0.000018997092,0.013002045,0.00023850192,0.0006743137,0.00003589287,0.000033869546,0.0071580326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7219002,0.2605664,0.0001365561,0.016942425,0.00027938135,0.000077482924,0.0000138197165,0.000016011329,0.00006768043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846315,0.00037152358,0.00037949535,0.00035729274,0.00014113072,0.00028738214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993201,0.00021862023,0.000109119035,0.00021129132,0.000013911289,0.0001269959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009989043,0.00015932079,0.0004017607,0.00002650214,0.00025472097,0.00008768376,0.00045379926,0.00009057855,0.00014772979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083193525,0.00012988782,0.00010860192,0.00018095206,0.00020173805,0.0001525026,0.00008160548,0.00020057519,0.00025672783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020241896,0.00012330757,0.5161872,0.0013087478,0.00016097062,0.000025770427,0.37774724,0.000012441392,0.00010331256,0.035484042,0.05385743,0.014969315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010332175,0.0000833083,0.2222484,0.0008922503,0.00012762778,0.0000010020185,0.13701028,0.00021107553,0.0000022962568,0.0074655404,0.63015157,0.00077340205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003679807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039078927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5762942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001696685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016257157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5562792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121144568","doi":"","title":"Influences intergenerationnelles sur la perception de prestations d'assurance-chomage au Canada et en Suede","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Direction des études analytiques : documents de recherche","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.07695900174742548,"score_gpt":0.3871248456768818,"score_spread":0.31016584392945634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121144568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8999234,0.0016470016,0.0124407895,0.0027748102,0.0007621635,0.00026163005,0.000048478058,0.00013583405,0.082005925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8912521,0.059230793,0.0077390694,0.00058651756,0.0003798394,0.00007043311,0.000058450096,0.00003971803,0.040643085],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99156904,0.006247307,0.00051498157,0.00046851614,0.00047897425,0.0007211881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971182,0.0017200237,0.00022604437,0.00023074716,0.0003958742,0.00030912657],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004475096,0.00033456177,0.00029477198,0.00015465249,0.00058974314,0.0003927817,0.00035372606,0.00060220785,0.00070229394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016608433,0.00037754877,0.00016665565,0.001041319,0.00034612848,0.001274646,0.0000549195,0.0006820808,0.000012349145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005565165,0.00048563766,0.8199931,0.00018789967,0.0005825762,0.000044899494,0.09003361,0.017005203,0.0014682546,0.020383453,0.0055566602,0.04420305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048453803,0.00011800555,0.71943456,0.0003872602,0.00031427923,0.000049219583,0.043999374,0.015191624,0.0002005109,0.0062651583,0.2127524,0.00080307416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9118191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20719574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009278776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053866953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121153735","doi":"","title":"How Does Job-Protected Maternity Leave Affect Mothers' Employment and Infant Health?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Entitlement (fair division); Welfare; Demographic economics; Maternity leave; Parental leave; Medicine; Labour economics; Demography; Psychology; Economics; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03435177976198211,"score_gpt":0.33673244358009385,"score_spread":0.30238066381811174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121153735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97767246,0.00038885153,0.000012921642,0.005150751,0.000625108,0.0022177452,0.00016382811,0.00011093851,0.013657409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94688666,0.04333074,0.00095823186,0.00024659027,0.00061991217,0.00033064277,0.000028900973,0.00007877131,0.0075195315],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519193,0.001276158,0.0005242817,0.0010988695,0.00053502835,0.0013737073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978979,0.00037494863,0.00027190594,0.00081909896,0.00014804942,0.0004880605],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00392051,0.00039623957,0.0007125851,0.00045178647,0.00069288566,0.00073003524,0.00078684866,0.0006650177,0.00005137315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045905673,0.00036817743,0.00014717622,0.00016620242,0.00084895967,0.0001718955,0.0009305048,0.0017726901,0.0000057795473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025233117,0.00048176266,0.5433659,0.0011036438,0.00045793186,0.000057513807,0.072133794,0.0027533036,0.00019988649,0.0032519375,0.00027555946,0.3756664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002926043,0.0005956191,0.75445366,0.0010396302,0.00003740834,0.000009939079,0.10176068,0.007445809,0.00010468377,0.009785703,0.11907242,0.0027683764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010972777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06444626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37289804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021962244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015172353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121210938","doi":"","title":"Wives, Mothers and Wages: Does Timing Matter?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Fertility; Wage; Differential (mechanical device); Marital status; Demographic economics; Economics; Association (psychology); Work (physics); Labour economics; National Longitudinal Surveys; Psychology; Demography; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.042555618286803217,"score_gpt":0.3255461414072912,"score_spread":0.282990523120488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121210938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6906445,0.00027592204,0.0000050879935,0.00086361315,0.0005633209,0.00056511076,0.00006314071,0.000042925793,0.30697638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9083016,0.062962174,0.0009829366,0.00025932945,0.00043959043,0.000067764115,0.000020409692,0.00007669409,0.02688953],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686766,0.00048042522,0.00043585984,0.00089188415,0.00034383792,0.0009803085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837965,0.00046177476,0.00014494805,0.00063670834,0.00008867154,0.00028823176],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001952256,0.0002800258,0.00044096884,0.0003855553,0.0005107418,0.00038630926,0.00074000936,0.00057178084,0.00044226475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002388851,0.00027522902,0.0001117525,0.00012857451,0.0009920811,0.00014010606,0.0007064999,0.0012919098,0.000035597055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005560198,0.00030801978,0.60662085,0.0006805707,0.0002937339,0.00009146136,0.12495035,0.0048410553,0.0000719505,0.0043809833,0.0008897769,0.25681567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020445273,0.00016415076,0.288228,0.0010395374,0.00006256394,0.000010959629,0.3777102,0.02912736,0.000021684627,0.03809254,0.2601114,0.0033870856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017288353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037539382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31839284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008293769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003805572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121241915","doi":"10.34989/swp-2010-28","title":"Trends in U.S. Hours and the Labor Wedge","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Marginal product of labor; Wedge (geometry); Labour economics; Marginal product; Wage; Consumption (sociology); Productivity; Demographic economics; Production (economics); Economic growth","score_opus":0.03519400573428178,"score_gpt":0.3370086069454081,"score_spread":0.3018146012111263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121241915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8106878,0.0010203002,6.5111715e-7,0.0025371907,0.00061196985,0.00038698377,0.000043761178,0.000021996078,0.18468934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91915303,0.074077874,0.00017267905,0.00021156119,0.00028970913,0.00015059795,0.00004629641,0.000036096186,0.005862135],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963125,0.0012421457,0.00046364494,0.0007658172,0.00034633544,0.00086957106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998071,0.00081826234,0.00011581466,0.000679269,0.00012805118,0.00018760363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051234257,0.00022835465,0.00051972806,0.0005383156,0.00034926366,0.0004388879,0.00081556634,0.00053418695,0.00009962528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068881304,0.00020894517,0.00014143837,0.00049511367,0.0015153829,0.00010786405,0.00094435265,0.0018454564,0.000002835158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001984774,0.00028319677,0.43266055,0.00011918417,0.00015481743,0.00012390906,0.10205873,0.0033666813,0.000010296265,0.02698683,0.00024290115,0.43379444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036652477,0.000042787677,0.7458363,0.00029869535,0.000024577386,0.0000043059713,0.19766171,0.0059287758,0.0000037603763,0.009567523,0.036002003,0.0009642795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004728563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.066157095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43283015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007927445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001216175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9508831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121257648","doi":"","title":"Status, caste, and the time allocation of women in rural India","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Caste; Autonomy; Hierarchy; Poverty; Work (physics); Time allocation; Developing country; Demographic economics; Survey data collection; Economics; Economic growth; Sociology; Development economics; Socioeconomics; Geography; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.025275314799800826,"score_gpt":0.3042000846288135,"score_spread":0.27892476982901265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121257648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8780269,0.00014848055,3.447145e-7,0.00012304861,0.0001520163,0.0006676731,0.000027133154,0.000008844026,0.12084558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745775,0.02323394,0.00008387697,0.000032835957,0.00007204777,0.00013567206,0.000021654148,0.00001998183,0.0018225012],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971417,0.00083300413,0.00046446107,0.00036398225,0.00025151306,0.00094531814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848807,0.0005795934,0.00018187857,0.000447361,0.00011152491,0.00019159321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00654361,0.00015259019,0.00043034353,0.0003200541,0.00014854089,0.000082493316,0.0005479557,0.00035080363,0.000061104016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000668551,0.00013875193,0.000057231206,0.0001766321,0.0012804023,0.00009741697,0.00054628437,0.00085948996,0.0000051479306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042151453,0.00029510952,0.46705773,0.00022975825,0.00016065412,0.000010123357,0.40188733,0.0012713196,0.00005064083,0.036296252,0.00002970473,0.09228986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002764641,0.00015055649,0.6666153,0.00025328176,0.000014502699,0.0000018667321,0.257921,0.0071183285,0.000009260582,0.05992941,0.0045079687,0.00071386504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008985391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074672317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19955757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015266464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014701881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99761385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121261218","doi":"","title":"Estimating Price Elasticities When There is Smuggling: The Sensitivity of Smoking to Price in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Price elasticity of demand; Economics; Context (archaeology); Econometrics; Consumption (sociology); Elasticity (physics); Alcohol consumption; Yield (engineering); Demographic economics; Monetary economics; Agricultural economics; Microeconomics; Alcohol; Geography","score_opus":0.01508649634248877,"score_gpt":0.2377603998359022,"score_spread":0.22267390349341343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121261218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789141,0.00092203583,0.012857617,0.002245707,0.0003014039,0.0001410025,0.0000059524127,0.000009624188,0.0046026013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980814,0.0004455745,0.0003481283,0.00038037804,0.00021399601,0.000001990324,2.503619e-7,0.000012414682,0.0005159084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710906,0.00032731186,0.00028887187,0.00014689767,0.0005461895,0.001581686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999063,0.0003982891,0.00019066792,0.00012064082,0.00014012416,0.000087260414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002822104,0.00011901346,0.00018007925,0.000064574175,0.00051885936,0.000057370205,0.00028658734,0.000052256186,0.00004625528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042337846,0.00009534044,0.000047483954,0.00035137226,0.00006544228,0.00012760017,0.00003797928,0.0010080297,0.0000019740605],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038419155,0.00016514177,0.52716434,0.000053777232,0.00037139148,0.000055653592,0.29438907,0.031956363,0.00038394285,0.10914064,0.0010976221,0.035183623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087438116,0.00021294474,0.07113062,0.00024946049,0.000096046526,0.00013798733,0.73280907,0.08862439,0.000052723608,0.10216157,0.002841847,0.00080893305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72517055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9727653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4560337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024629077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004674366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8292125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121275060","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104259","title":"More or Less Unmarried. The Impact of Legal Settings of Cohabitation on Labour Market Outcomes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université Laval","keywords":"Cohabitation; Alimony; Earnings; Demographic economics; Inequality; Work (physics); Separation (statistics); Economics; Labour economics; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.03310266566215277,"score_gpt":0.3291445822025378,"score_spread":0.29604191654038503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121275060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8610399,0.0058448985,0.0000088787665,0.003086206,0.00028491722,0.00036372137,0.0001409714,0.000019292966,0.12921126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93614113,0.049642127,0.000184578,0.002196791,0.00013211631,0.000004622091,0.000021888734,0.00003478902,0.011641936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981643,0.0008770446,0.00048471152,0.00018890863,0.000111122994,0.00017389996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881667,0.00030312978,0.00038538297,0.00033712006,0.00009911039,0.00005860137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018715038,0.00012313495,0.0003912523,0.000023951305,0.00011055828,0.00003590358,0.00033100139,0.00002196519,0.0005386763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005576265,0.00007792644,0.0002392003,0.00014279512,0.00015118919,0.00010954901,0.0000514342,0.000094879884,0.00005221032],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013974072,0.00047607606,0.5340563,0.0053541623,0.0011364783,0.0001014643,0.03151135,0.0010231908,0.00012624243,0.14017001,0.18029353,0.10561143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035947064,0.0000832366,0.9000076,0.0009832652,0.00007936096,0.0000041034314,0.00781276,0.00005968454,0.000006753908,0.00014531221,0.09023129,0.00022714352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043014754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022415805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36595127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009918641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003712524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5898127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121311255","doi":"","title":"Collective household labor supply: nonparticipation and income taxation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare economics; Economics; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.050823287884622835,"score_gpt":0.3396549133291135,"score_spread":0.2888316254444907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121311255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9316308,0.00010074864,0.000009408891,0.00047935097,0.00045073777,0.0009245319,0.00014633684,0.000055757406,0.06620233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762371,0.017495584,0.00038748232,0.00007956016,0.00032634835,0.0002757674,0.00006221065,0.000042323103,0.0050935824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699485,0.00065711455,0.00045919386,0.00072489295,0.00038378497,0.00078013964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823815,0.00052768167,0.00029491028,0.0004507255,0.0002448597,0.00024365589],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00259161,0.00022353324,0.00038119443,0.00048669588,0.00058257347,0.000303129,0.00040341206,0.00058729673,0.000047455298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009200278,0.0002665744,0.00006895952,0.00039773333,0.00056545023,0.00018095522,0.00044769226,0.001030869,0.0000049731793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007643079,0.00015461473,0.94206965,0.00008033423,0.00006641924,0.000015927691,0.02843385,0.007630973,0.00003325891,0.0037379789,0.000058277237,0.017642282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068348664,0.00008428523,0.95118076,0.0001182498,0.000016648733,0.0000013247956,0.018475076,0.00869562,0.000011825349,0.013510999,0.0067364164,0.0004853049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030288752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020789508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061108746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026908666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025228662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121334304","doi":"10.3386/w22126","title":"Targeted or Universal Coverage? Assessing Heterogeneity in the Effects of Universal Childcare","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; York University; University of Toronto; University of Waterloo; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Universal design; Universal coverage; Computer science; Economics; Economic growth; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1332084362454007,"score_gpt":0.4527604460173282,"score_spread":0.31955200977192744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121334304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9054565,0.00020531373,0.00008407276,0.0008824746,0.00057582854,0.0008159334,0.0001541674,0.0000122134425,0.09181352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985948,0.00062229316,0.00008475648,0.000025139288,0.00025634962,0.000014125406,0.00008471899,0.00001329786,0.0003045219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966163,0.001291455,0.00034965048,0.0003917997,0.00096861355,0.0003821737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586433,0.0029061118,0.00024241672,0.00027778358,0.0006353719,0.00007399252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034010427,0.0001498808,0.00032663957,0.00049581693,0.00024829363,0.00008638551,0.0011007269,0.00037950094,0.00008547453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010786004,0.00011532795,0.00013819343,0.00025800086,0.00064756675,0.00022891209,0.0003519099,0.0006281437,0.000007947514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021036083,0.0003093881,0.09450238,0.00048736416,0.00029808455,0.000031046326,0.015190972,0.0025221996,0.0005855812,0.8831293,0.001506521,0.0012268319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035270914,0.00029490652,0.29835796,0.00075247476,0.00005160929,0.0000026976866,0.02066622,0.0016866897,0.00058835384,0.67157537,0.0017572938,0.00073931756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004530185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038666502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2115539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014387622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004126521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7320271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121344002","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3390143","title":"Born in the Family: Preferences for Boys and the Gender Gap in Math","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Gender gap; Socialization; Preference; Fertility; Developmental psychology; Population; National Longitudinal Surveys; Psychology; Percentage point; Demography; Mathematics; Demographic economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.025150783026907295,"score_gpt":0.27863522235292937,"score_spread":0.25348443932602205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121344002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832955,0.004148092,0.00052764534,0.0014040159,0.00020991203,0.0005322641,0.0000023936134,0.00000735242,0.0098728305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887859,0.009992625,0.000036927675,0.0004458001,0.00014946306,0.000021094229,0.0000010964181,0.000007936801,0.00055911846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762404,0.00039052678,0.00021102515,0.00015277279,0.00030005476,0.0013215534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994343,0.00027867762,0.000091750095,0.00011892858,0.000044995177,0.000031360316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006248236,0.00010141434,0.00015812601,0.000066876586,0.00029876403,0.00013358069,0.00045544296,0.00008411553,0.000004632612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007774523,0.00005554362,0.000060559454,0.00023139872,0.00014786293,0.00014893297,0.000021563837,0.00092539465,0.0000052292294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057944955,0.000029965744,0.082923934,0.000005104478,0.000022793443,4.76775e-7,0.026395082,0.000025841817,0.0000115301245,0.8884546,0.000047161033,0.0020255472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013839668,0.00007588072,0.07943269,0.0000076042984,0.000013315298,0.000010113601,0.22627066,0.0004402407,1.4468905e-7,0.6901308,0.0021373916,0.00009725063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012377189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026948286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19987558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002491851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00151441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99080735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121386378","doi":"","title":"Children's Resources in Collective Households: Identification, Estimation and an Application to Child Poverty in Malawi","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Clothing; Consumption (sociology); Estimation; Economics; Identification (biology); Household income; Private good; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Geography; Public good; Microeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02309851060107353,"score_gpt":0.32071037963341326,"score_spread":0.2976118690323397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121386378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98050743,0.00009320718,0.000060550217,0.00053298974,0.00014926416,0.0020818983,0.00007789032,0.000038739414,0.016458038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99531513,0.002753845,0.00061471603,0.00010171384,0.00023680554,0.00051633664,0.000100380385,0.000038516373,0.0003225678],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681383,0.0006538949,0.00060406094,0.0009078935,0.0003347162,0.00068557536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857837,0.00024304759,0.00018769452,0.00062457187,0.00011400575,0.00025232276],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039259414,0.0002206138,0.00035492217,0.00074107776,0.0003574042,0.00028720836,0.00060879753,0.0004976334,0.0000068944887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005774226,0.0002715917,0.00004226476,0.00058337225,0.00028053302,0.00032419004,0.0003820798,0.0009466001,0.000005764729],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006516668,0.00030277393,0.88732827,0.000044901128,0.000019145506,0.000001198806,0.043034684,0.025083574,0.000023891913,0.0017318947,0.000018440658,0.042346045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032977381,0.000023144235,0.9770129,0.000073066876,0.0000041759145,7.223297e-7,0.00756287,0.009655805,0.000005755385,0.004539912,0.00049720675,0.00029469424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006651082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04699919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08968459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020843921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050279655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121393843","doi":"10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2019-38","title":"The Effect of House Prices on Fertility: Evidence from Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; Renting; House price; Real estate; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Affect (linguistics); Monetary economics; Population; Demography; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.14516543225217185,"score_gpt":0.4954196328018469,"score_spread":0.35025420054967504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121393843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816641,0.011352571,0.000015824939,0.00027792185,0.0015401903,0.00068201683,0.000045668592,0.00002590457,0.0043957774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903361,0.008932529,0.000020772763,0.00017810335,0.00011493144,0.00001586325,0.0000018539728,0.00002928948,0.00037054636],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961849,0.0009005521,0.00061688776,0.00038498928,0.0014607521,0.0004519612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939773,0.004097629,0.0007653005,0.0006387456,0.00028436395,0.00023666867],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003006541,0.00024396395,0.00062742917,0.00014348039,0.00059307157,0.0008202332,0.0037803687,0.000111444235,0.0012484586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013645164,0.00016888214,0.00014987573,0.0007610958,0.00025067845,0.0011797836,0.0004146265,0.00035482162,0.000014285262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025538035,0.00003464287,0.9851787,0.00003988906,0.00011197118,0.000005892883,0.0011178103,0.00016201272,0.0040769954,0.00006726876,0.0053219157,0.0036275045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024620016,0.00002824015,0.9893908,0.0003516519,0.000054212825,1.7855629e-7,0.00097273465,0.000065003514,0.003193568,0.000990455,0.00449426,0.00021269567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78306746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4525987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33046877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002811144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096730207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121416423","doi":"","title":"The Rug Rat Race","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Demographic economics; Rivalry; Crowding out; Crowding; Economics; Race (biology); Demography; Psychology; Sociology; Monetary economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.007990697662590123,"score_gpt":0.26589963002514583,"score_spread":0.2579089323625557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121416423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82826686,0.022899106,0.010579273,0.044675633,0.002686759,0.00036651694,0.0000014029272,0.00015714444,0.0903673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94931316,0.03246807,0.000037170983,0.00045372205,0.00073759246,9.608794e-7,4.7427537e-7,0.0000074692166,0.016981384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968406,0.00020702671,0.0001735181,0.00011578247,0.00039306746,0.0022700105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948645,0.000082229264,0.000098439625,0.00013502201,0.00009011725,0.00010775113],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031326073,0.00009518476,0.000098027806,0.00003312268,0.0020354476,0.0002058831,0.00048733575,0.00007469352,0.000012084443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012258746,0.00006649465,0.000096329546,0.00024295907,0.0001162012,0.00016465494,0.000011295999,0.0012176427,0.00003712631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013660341,0.00002610428,0.002257611,2.4203973e-7,0.000025297719,0.0000020462255,0.002916707,0.00001810458,0.00007336369,0.95920837,0.0010641397,0.034394335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003349836,0.00016138468,0.0045845984,0.0000043098794,0.00002013163,0.000044835786,0.053508915,0.000053869644,0.000005381833,0.81477827,0.12634005,0.0001632905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014827441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008446464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14443015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007243904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029544474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121421317","doi":"","title":"Tax, Social Policy and Gender","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Gender Institute, Australian National University; Queen's University; Curtin University of Technology; Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia; Australian National University","keywords":"Social policy; Economics; Political science; Public economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.120307618305344,"score_gpt":0.4279196425749812,"score_spread":0.3076120242696372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121421317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028085816,0.000092259164,0.00010956276,0.0002986824,0.0009389852,0.0011148204,0.000026465015,0.0000767868,0.99453384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0117591135,0.00059256254,0.00031220732,0.0007959961,0.0031070088,0.00006787446,0.00038316628,0.000099177865,0.9828829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969234,0.00034174748,0.00062802766,0.00072548015,0.0008591219,0.0005222134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976701,0.00021094515,0.0008258592,0.00041760583,0.0006503546,0.00022510202],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012131693,0.00042544096,0.00074539334,0.0004300635,0.0015115329,0.002429741,0.0029594405,0.00035816059,0.0045013996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002944173,0.0004774865,0.00016032245,0.00026965397,0.0015986634,0.002193157,0.0014183905,0.00032221474,0.00043494173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004748728,0.00007475282,0.0029353648,0.00017827882,0.00031906163,0.000004790868,0.010710389,6.151224e-7,0.000017360904,0.8844829,0.04752646,0.053702533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037325642,0.00001875979,0.02472423,0.000044833687,0.000091415626,7.207558e-7,0.00046611842,0.0000056485146,0.000003465843,0.08225953,0.89148366,0.0005283594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064041372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049687563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8439572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068450574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054996675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121447473","doi":"","title":"Earnings Supplements and Job Quality Among Former Welfare Recipients: Evidence from the Self-Sufficiency Project","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Self-employment; Social assistance; Quality (philosophy); Quality circle; Business; Economics; Operations management; Economic growth; Accounting","score_opus":0.024131601868322115,"score_gpt":0.31411257879560206,"score_spread":0.2899809769272799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121447473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912915,0.0020046048,0.0012693056,0.001223131,0.00038217515,0.0003544919,0.00000936108,0.00004262037,0.0034227795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863631,0.012241364,0.00023259636,0.00012143477,0.0001725225,0.000011011455,0.000003157376,0.00001588918,0.0008388989],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99539804,0.0010128977,0.00039132056,0.00032743477,0.00076241756,0.0021079117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893934,0.00024557157,0.00028841465,0.00020991324,0.00019521767,0.00012151814],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071422863,0.00018353072,0.00019255948,0.000058435435,0.0021966167,0.0002483095,0.0005151987,0.00011740133,0.00007764328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009439231,0.00013304963,0.00009904502,0.00043916208,0.00022279716,0.0006025508,0.000048153797,0.0013574105,0.0000072352836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011247267,0.000048626913,0.8742222,0.000002395607,0.00007274287,9.004848e-7,0.022444986,0.0000014895379,0.000015451178,0.10191868,0.00013530209,0.0011259777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006187439,0.00021259769,0.7741356,0.00004477541,0.00008095603,0.00001427885,0.16997749,0.000025571435,0.0000026627051,0.031881865,0.0226824,0.00032305348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010851642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039917562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14753251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008718525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002682796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121447600","doi":"10.3386/w24995","title":"Long-term Changes in Married Couples' Labor Supply and Taxes: Evidence from the US and Europe Since the 1980s","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Economics; Labour economics; Consumption (sociology); Wage; Term (time); Demographic economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.2631745388046962,"score_gpt":0.4737653703956945,"score_spread":0.21059083159099828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121447600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9390146,0.013610311,0.0000013969669,0.01370948,0.00063792994,0.001105294,0.000993737,0.000011912706,0.03091532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.882406,0.11036863,0.00004005401,0.00019700543,0.0016086999,0.00007235307,0.00013582176,0.00002756482,0.005143901],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996677,0.00064048584,0.00037966325,0.0005221059,0.0013688075,0.00041193323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931137,0.004397455,0.0002442312,0.00031594513,0.0018262382,0.00010245024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00882801,0.00017607988,0.00031302407,0.0001919412,0.0005437928,0.0002694101,0.0008575627,0.00027638415,0.00018963328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004163742,0.00012373639,0.000037685233,0.00031305774,0.0020708675,0.00017490258,0.00032314775,0.000577841,0.000023096889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006312945,0.000033284225,0.9498335,0.00008575317,0.00009837019,0.000008721927,0.0054652365,0.000013526974,0.000061370665,0.024369732,0.018852342,0.0011150127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022961425,0.000064346925,0.9522927,0.000323181,0.000017528495,0.0000037436162,0.0016400885,0.0001597938,0.000006045604,0.012422353,0.03265024,0.00019040912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042167623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19881548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15664786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005465545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004063634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9642107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121466660","doi":"","title":"Effects of the 2001 Extension of Paid Parental Leave Provisions on Birth Seasonality in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Seasonality; Demography; Geography; Demographic economics; Preparedness; Economics; Ecology; Biology; Sociology","score_opus":0.023766594941896535,"score_gpt":0.23551459619145926,"score_spread":0.21174800124956272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121466660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852575,0.0003533273,0.000028375329,0.00056728174,0.0004317103,0.0010175785,0.0013702606,0.000019806255,0.01095415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996633,0.0013016112,0.0005873553,0.000071990165,0.0000380749,0.0000014687079,0.00008822308,0.000025214718,0.0012530409],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950705,0.0016821489,0.0004581787,0.0006763434,0.0015198063,0.0005930008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661297,0.0007888973,0.0007395973,0.0010338222,0.00048140873,0.0003433356],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010451537,0.00038514016,0.00084829173,0.00018014264,0.0004177275,0.000010055681,0.0019931423,0.00028154178,0.00004636046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068140205,0.00038203568,0.0004255496,0.00043328956,0.0013873136,0.00008243489,0.0018492095,0.0011259378,0.00000152028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001797712,0.0024659478,0.7250689,0.0027696958,0.0006874594,0.0003137866,0.23881602,0.0050160117,0.0011210726,0.006403095,0.009278641,0.006261631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001631121,0.00021081259,0.86396587,0.0016612295,0.00017163296,0.000002250841,0.11897407,0.005187,0.000056996218,0.0033556286,0.0042012874,0.00058213423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9275627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97075284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13889693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001374356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009235119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121505579","doi":"","title":"Availability of Family-Friendly Work Practices and Implicit Wage Costs: New Evidence from Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family-friendly; Earnings; Wage; Labour economics; Business; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Marketing; Economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.05643928832472659,"score_gpt":0.35244788393712617,"score_spread":0.29600859561239956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121505579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560042,0.0012140721,0.000009690244,0.00084356987,0.0007143951,0.00077851315,0.0001585247,0.000023669225,0.040253386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964587,0.032275565,0.0012868285,0.0001315254,0.00038503594,0.00004703213,0.00003002458,0.00003584819,0.0012211517],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526465,0.0011189951,0.00082391046,0.0012058651,0.0006877749,0.00089883065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99240965,0.0047481637,0.000794905,0.0012307558,0.00031130912,0.0005052102],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046785614,0.0003160471,0.0007223581,0.00017029057,0.00033552357,0.00025208265,0.0012924153,0.0005609913,0.00007842435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007037167,0.0003527269,0.00009344083,0.00025646997,0.00083501835,0.00024611416,0.0011175732,0.0015587041,0.000003299272],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021000493,0.000106258296,0.87842965,0.00020428353,0.00016919234,0.000018766785,0.009140406,0.0011781579,0.00018046545,0.00080450845,0.001555185,0.1080031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005835729,0.00010770765,0.9019882,0.0008802559,0.000047195437,7.525908e-7,0.0424155,0.0010229729,0.000025808407,0.0037693442,0.048253674,0.0009050289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9324126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93952596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10709807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027179695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009753722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121565934","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.877905","title":"The Long-Term Effects of a Generous Income Support Program: Unemployment Insurance in New Brunswick and Maine, 1940-1991","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Unemployment; Economics; Income Support; Actuarial science; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.006055683132541431,"score_gpt":0.2583061331160297,"score_spread":0.2522504499834882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121565934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99111265,0.0069563105,0.0003314314,0.00045811798,0.0002569343,0.00044419314,8.3191895e-7,0.000026199059,0.0004133282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98519623,0.0123666795,0.00008792827,0.00003879124,0.0002780954,0.000006725432,0.0000030400886,0.000017317268,0.0020051969],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970047,0.00020375704,0.00037633473,0.00018693261,0.00041964298,0.0018086183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934644,0.000115738105,0.00020806766,0.0001430719,0.000071546376,0.00011514536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015065126,0.0001559579,0.00021875309,0.00008864522,0.00044447725,0.00009988131,0.00033827362,0.00010130968,0.0000018899242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050565526,0.00011968549,0.00007523797,0.00039445006,0.00024020643,0.0001281238,0.000038232934,0.00072843913,0.000001973345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026239462,0.00011820711,0.8966328,0.000017474642,0.000038091774,0.000015185085,0.0010482415,0.000022467222,0.000050618102,0.07621683,0.000024073677,0.025789784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011164984,0.0004250811,0.9485473,0.0000349311,0.000021338425,0.00005701309,0.000842325,0.000017319593,0.000013465451,0.04817398,0.0005891164,0.00016164382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01284681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35035792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33751112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059521635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005020679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99372673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121609190","doi":"","title":"Are Two Carrots Better Than One? The Effects of Adding Employment Services to Financial Incentive Programs for Welfare Recipients","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Earnings; Incentive; Welfare; Labour economics; Poverty; Business; Wage; Economics; Social Welfare; Finance; Economic growth; Accounting","score_opus":0.0350083157066833,"score_gpt":0.3431030730931899,"score_spread":0.3080947573865066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121609190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98717874,0.00013367936,0.000015071462,0.00080904027,0.0014957716,0.0048876656,0.00016965349,0.00003435956,0.005275993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953083,0.0010896194,0.00095734774,0.00024870847,0.0006102372,0.0011516489,0.00008041489,0.00005708201,0.00049668504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610794,0.00047373323,0.0006207214,0.0008962685,0.0006571925,0.0012441258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736524,0.00073084544,0.00045396155,0.000722671,0.0004642307,0.00026307555],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003150129,0.00032264873,0.0005921793,0.0003600055,0.0007414996,0.00020936936,0.0014007724,0.00047418644,0.000007434932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066562847,0.000305748,0.00025709913,0.00032863955,0.00041792594,0.000101277255,0.0011078335,0.0009658882,0.0000026563316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003269753,0.0005711028,0.6585795,0.001278539,0.0002562032,0.000018361776,0.046275973,0.0009333119,0.00004863236,0.0025108582,0.000056215726,0.2891443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019446297,0.0004539922,0.88071406,0.0030255076,0.0000780842,4.649351e-7,0.046778314,0.00056509324,0.00015286407,0.004391181,0.060763698,0.001132124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030118555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050563894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2880122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014122778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004948558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121609699","doi":"10.1353/jhr.2010.0007","title":"Evidence from Maternity Leave Expansions of the Impact of Maternal Care on Early Child Development","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Human Resources","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of California, Davis; McMaster University","keywords":"Maternity leave; Child care; Maternity care; Child development; Psychology; Medicine; Developmental psychology; Nursing; Health care; Economics; Economic growth; Sick leave","score_opus":0.029502455631711506,"score_gpt":0.3026050062275276,"score_spread":0.2731025505958161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121609699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983332,0.00024439223,0.0000032316468,0.000101949874,0.00022603438,0.0000940344,0.000016403998,0.0000049174914,0.00097579823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952143,0.000077998266,0.000056907942,0.000018509132,0.00020763755,4.4195573e-7,2.3640484e-7,0.0000084607145,0.0001083552],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836403,0.00030766873,0.00040189637,0.0000712945,0.0006745948,0.00018048538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859774,0.00018524945,0.00063846144,0.00025179965,0.00024672045,0.00008005342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008175966,0.00010887972,0.0002085032,0.00006380542,0.00063243,0.000044819615,0.0009992896,0.000071838665,0.00011966861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102339385,0.00005367792,0.00016372655,0.000104065446,0.00038291642,0.00009632871,0.00008718341,0.00042805012,0.0000029143675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006654212,0.000048307134,0.64858055,0.000009065805,0.00007862884,0.0000018292244,0.3358889,0.00019186387,0.014644011,0.000057086527,0.000053195803,0.00038002175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013838892,0.00013359314,0.9726285,0.00034006446,0.00003289738,0.0000029770786,0.022342889,0.0000017702189,0.0039781816,0.00027858838,0.00006236324,0.00005980515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008374716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037836838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32404792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005727711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016307512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121620220","doi":"","title":"Taxation Reforms: a CGE-Microsimulation Analysis for Pakistan","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Agency for International Development; International Development Research Centre; Government of Canada; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Tax reform; Value-added tax; Indirect tax; Economics; Sales tax; Ad valorem tax; Computable general equilibrium; Tax rate; Tax credit; Public economics; Direct tax; Revenue; Tax revenue; Investment (military); Monetary economics; Macroeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.03999722035590099,"score_gpt":0.3763063202478084,"score_spread":0.33630909989190744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121620220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93530357,0.000050925995,0.00078725646,0.0003798281,0.000807244,0.0016937657,0.00028842466,0.00007211951,0.060616896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890813,0.003761193,0.002572427,0.00006172857,0.00047535484,0.0003067714,0.00057528913,0.000045084646,0.0031208303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968018,0.00031002052,0.0007084811,0.0008912146,0.00040449869,0.00088400097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732673,0.00059364975,0.00053675065,0.00084620045,0.00047658576,0.00022008592],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004781361,0.0002540112,0.0005341755,0.0009421638,0.0007005502,0.000409709,0.0007665655,0.0010280804,0.00005725711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010695286,0.00027940786,0.00038599377,0.000546593,0.00046010577,0.000178512,0.0003304878,0.0013324297,0.000004934459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035619753,0.0005571362,0.5282362,0.00043267923,0.0014271562,0.000008903887,0.051311564,0.19520679,0.00065324747,0.04000738,0.000095448464,0.18170731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020878876,0.00018203992,0.44328794,0.00014890927,0.00038775854,7.2103495e-7,0.051931277,0.32219708,0.00005906808,0.06042554,0.11727656,0.0020152114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002826481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06402976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17969209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018958289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012868618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121678854","doi":"10.3386/w23380","title":"How do the U.S and Canadian Social Safety Nets Compare for Women and Children?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.23405490553550082,"score_gpt":0.47329033614826405,"score_spread":0.23923543061276323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121678854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076474264,0.0017317974,0.0000019852853,0.015521075,0.00066078256,0.0017444674,0.0023817618,0.000009650333,0.90147424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765819,0.0031229132,0.000021114294,0.000033824424,0.0013819315,0.00008028711,0.0002749649,0.000018313734,0.018484805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796957,0.00016395297,0.0002228604,0.00034270124,0.00076051935,0.0005404007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770755,0.00056826236,0.00020191903,0.00016174883,0.0011334352,0.00022706353],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006167858,0.00013044645,0.0003168222,0.00026272624,0.0023695356,0.00050671987,0.0005335813,0.00028991656,0.000032021002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007392502,0.00011612151,0.00006366901,0.000053924392,0.001124675,0.00013482038,0.00009525816,0.00037315968,0.0000019248819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051643852,0.00002760142,0.11474363,0.000119026605,0.0005156599,0.0000012920283,0.013752334,0.000010336449,0.000001068584,0.7144415,0.14617066,0.010165248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049479195,0.000039274695,0.27983195,0.000023012773,0.000013633105,0.0000042861257,0.007201263,0.0000710793,1.3178372e-7,0.23518,0.47690177,0.0002388043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16510236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41987702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90010756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020654912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011272025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121699408","doi":"","title":"Suicide and Property Rights in India","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Università Bocconi; International Fine Particle Research Institute; Maryland Population Research Center, University of Maryland; World Bank Group","keywords":"Download; Property rights; Wife; Developing country; State (computer science); Demographic economics; Domestic violence; Property (philosophy); Political science; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Economics; Economic growth; Medicine; Law; Environmental health","score_opus":0.027108190982920097,"score_gpt":0.31126311141646695,"score_spread":0.28415492043354684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121699408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6795493,0.000024367635,7.6622354e-7,0.00018485429,0.00008533184,0.00021524266,0.0000023509135,0.000013383296,0.3199244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453187,0.0018309599,0.00020088571,0.000106630905,0.00011170939,0.000028638393,0.0000032829516,0.000010888815,0.0031751154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812025,0.00042617926,0.00024589052,0.00036723286,0.00019045713,0.0006500001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991313,0.00036175275,0.000037777387,0.00024331136,0.000048853963,0.00017699857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002797615,0.00009976226,0.00019489526,0.0002518648,0.00030346343,0.00009811797,0.0002941662,0.00016535088,0.000030844807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042640895,0.000082130515,0.00002742193,0.00021278647,0.0004892755,0.0001639111,0.00010108687,0.00039072277,0.000010718598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034704877,0.00011853881,0.81870306,0.0000245861,0.000012370347,0.000016533488,0.0111209955,0.00013131139,0.000095505755,0.054398183,0.000046232457,0.11529801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008658487,0.00010893826,0.83366,0.00006442925,0.0000023373436,0.0000021007365,0.009089377,0.0045057065,0.000021783835,0.015924968,0.13537873,0.00037575755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00431113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035679024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3167493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033817827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024291384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9819173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121717559","doi":"","title":"Assessing the Impact of a Wage Subsidy for Single Parents on Social Assistance","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Endogeneity; Duration (music); Economics; Wage; Government (linguistics); Population; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Social assistance; Current Population Survey; Econometrics; Demography; Economic growth","score_opus":0.10269813595338448,"score_gpt":0.4261523821821594,"score_spread":0.32345424622877494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121717559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90995836,0.000031508214,0.0000133799385,0.00023164327,0.0006594754,0.0009384866,0.0001915904,0.000022586335,0.08795294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767774,0.00074483035,0.0002777545,0.00002598253,0.0005636032,0.00014583246,0.000047445727,0.00004755302,0.00046927427],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968684,0.0005792648,0.0005378244,0.00063794997,0.00044373074,0.0009328409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972455,0.0013002551,0.00038704113,0.0006248644,0.00030207128,0.00014026402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004209254,0.00026061226,0.0005061051,0.00022382404,0.0008871747,0.00047835667,0.0011298754,0.00069558364,0.000031139843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011721037,0.00022168474,0.00042402808,0.00018411504,0.0009609346,0.00014412313,0.00033808645,0.0016924434,0.0000017034439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006871035,0.0032934179,0.39401817,0.0006153855,0.0009997895,0.000029432946,0.07834505,0.016507499,0.0057946965,0.020323852,0.0007161227,0.47866946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002059735,0.00043196662,0.8733263,0.0004662675,0.00005602919,0.0000015817396,0.07929707,0.011670967,0.00016597933,0.022183219,0.008881733,0.0014591649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016486445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005086402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4793081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015891714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002093672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9040041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121782190","doi":"","title":"Marriage Market, Divorce Legislation and Household Labor Supply","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Legislation; Economics; Position (finance); Labour economics; Identification (biology); Affect (linguistics); Distribution (mathematics); Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.03043814424808894,"score_gpt":0.3006066288521146,"score_spread":0.27016848460402565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121782190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71259034,0.00010622221,0.0000023865598,0.00057011243,0.00017248232,0.0002616968,0.000025304487,0.000037138925,0.28623432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521696,0.028122474,0.00024490367,0.00016993642,0.00025425002,0.000031097465,0.000009196942,0.000027118758,0.018971438],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997946,0.00035700775,0.00027130725,0.0004235654,0.00027475992,0.0007273384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886554,0.00045816152,0.000058519174,0.00032053684,0.00007411695,0.00022312012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023021612,0.00012946416,0.0001905563,0.00022671155,0.0004943194,0.00018862126,0.00030703426,0.00018984055,0.00016192325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039847495,0.00014559965,0.000043296553,0.00030825278,0.00047258963,0.0003095773,0.000120099234,0.00036027274,0.0000063552125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052296164,0.00006152087,0.9468947,0.000011038074,0.000016148042,0.000026847738,0.0038565763,0.00018246776,0.000079882564,0.006477476,0.00034699764,0.04199403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005953165,0.000049353635,0.783751,0.000022073731,0.0000040791624,0.000004105168,0.012607183,0.0021324363,0.0000032570722,0.002153022,0.19842234,0.00025584697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010483979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009208656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2672629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032769403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027878402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59373814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121832781","doi":"","title":"When Can Experimental Evidence Mislead? A Re-Assessment of Canada's Self Sufficiency Project","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Incentive; Welfare; Workforce; Work (physics); Economics; Public economics; Impact evaluation; Control (management); Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.05773531003526097,"score_gpt":0.3764997666178109,"score_spread":0.3187644565825499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121832781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76516014,0.00031340678,0.0000040206687,0.0012542059,0.0008836811,0.0015101476,0.00017049332,0.00004423847,0.23065968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884171,0.0068342574,0.0009624723,0.000074122094,0.00023220171,0.00026299807,0.000012993971,0.000045927456,0.0031579498],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478805,0.0009287813,0.00080104574,0.0010682782,0.0010752069,0.0013386639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715346,0.00082704826,0.00035275146,0.0010127886,0.0003433938,0.00031058563],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038661212,0.0003385604,0.0006227879,0.0003847296,0.0004679769,0.00013074582,0.0016158029,0.00038189202,0.000090599046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006473429,0.00033548096,0.0001581108,0.00021234508,0.00069132325,0.0001279843,0.00097188435,0.0010047918,7.868932e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034663794,0.0035398188,0.54160947,0.0019905723,0.00096780964,0.00036555252,0.33596033,0.002966755,0.0029574726,0.05232183,0.0061835586,0.050790213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004155266,0.0016647027,0.21827109,0.0063660196,0.00012197855,0.000014546592,0.6081399,0.019549636,0.0010292201,0.010272367,0.12412112,0.0062941727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45930108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80523884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34593776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008848558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03550987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121909291","doi":"","title":"On the Equivalence of Common Approaches to Cross Sectional Weights in Household Panel Surveys","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Econometrics; Sampling (signal processing); British Household Panel Survey; Cross-sectional study; Statistics; Equivalence (formal languages); Sampling design; Mathematics; Computer science; Medicine; Environmental health; Population","score_opus":0.24220437923559424,"score_gpt":0.35770754132603266,"score_spread":0.11550316209043843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121909291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9364548,0.00002141484,0.000006855025,0.00038683254,0.0007047216,0.0008964132,0.0001867613,0.000022383636,0.06131982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996828,0.0013729273,0.00016649795,0.00006890588,0.0002192548,0.00017073576,0.000026955606,0.00003644718,0.0011102783],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954616,0.001596465,0.0006540692,0.00081197155,0.0006348749,0.00084103557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962082,0.0023276755,0.00019357598,0.0009648571,0.00010986883,0.00019582949],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013539532,0.00024943598,0.00044043144,0.00043500264,0.00040648493,0.00022689634,0.0016685817,0.00073327223,0.000045108565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093043764,0.00022378073,0.00015058312,0.00031555697,0.0011231765,0.00008430523,0.0008778709,0.0026794616,0.0000069220996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006914787,0.00043278787,0.8916494,0.000099310826,0.000042542655,0.000008320615,0.011671674,0.040565997,0.00003827183,0.047726374,0.000016323715,0.007679801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002243978,0.000055018456,0.9726806,0.00008860173,0.0000019208953,6.3261746e-7,0.0035276813,0.0026897911,0.000026916177,0.019621614,0.0007734996,0.00030928146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005190243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046404835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081031196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000815253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010562144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121914675","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2906421","title":"A Marriage Matching Function with Flexible Spillover and Substitution Patterns","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Substitution (logic); Spillover effect; Function (biology); Matching (statistics); Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Statistics; Evolutionary biology; Biology","score_opus":0.012512046745954991,"score_gpt":0.261377814294311,"score_spread":0.24886576754835601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121914675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.928193,0.00034273593,0.065912426,0.00039875854,0.00037189806,0.00008933973,0.000001979371,0.000028748871,0.0046611265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99368215,0.0035776193,0.000049688806,0.000068213965,0.00043960777,0.0000019087306,0.0000018047343,0.000011017933,0.0021679695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982469,0.00007645486,0.00011232616,0.00015538298,0.00028460805,0.0011243445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995018,0.000015710915,0.00016921593,0.00015165187,0.00006810414,0.0000935143],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015797134,0.000100508216,0.0001044116,0.000051081417,0.002166578,0.00040094604,0.00020299715,0.00007505564,0.00002078757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036979687,0.00008307066,0.000035540554,0.00004493726,0.0001344972,0.000608957,0.000025015826,0.0006823437,0.00000797265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069508256,0.000026757849,0.42379388,0.0000063046064,0.00008021331,0.000005329326,0.0024150573,0.000037302878,0.0001513227,0.5661192,0.000010822759,0.0072843395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011985708,0.0003126613,0.5992764,0.000055302895,0.000096193864,0.000117917094,0.028874004,0.00011379076,0.000007039757,0.36678743,0.002839578,0.00032106196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026566738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025355298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19933173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043402062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010389277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121992013","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1676024","title":"Politico Economic Consequences of Rising Wage Inequality","year":2010,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Economics; Economic inequality; Wage inequality; Wage; Labour economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01690234688227941,"score_gpt":0.28921943085366725,"score_spread":0.2723170839713878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121992013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851307,0.0014851835,0.00060179096,0.001554122,0.0026863513,0.00016125294,0.00005525266,0.000025084297,0.008300219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865563,0.010762314,0.00011592564,0.000117031464,0.0012713403,0.0000014409957,0.0000041458497,0.00002746802,0.001144021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940612,0.0005168388,0.00090161833,0.00035845579,0.00046150928,0.0037003795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813676,0.00024004151,0.0007877137,0.00032013154,0.00021104813,0.00030431105],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066270153,0.0002955945,0.0005180718,0.00017316562,0.0008265834,0.0001942706,0.0008310793,0.00037242507,0.00022547804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026402605,0.00029210202,0.00030359655,0.0002368386,0.0012801427,0.00041744142,0.00006879145,0.0037466814,0.00007023697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021719457,0.00009033113,0.08298958,0.000012628704,0.00023494606,0.0000034810253,0.005377011,0.000033575998,0.0031573824,0.9057387,0.000022330505,0.0023183126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009719435,0.00039585348,0.024500579,0.000048586942,0.00023161503,0.00014529313,0.09574532,0.00023949138,0.00034738993,0.8745925,0.0021506567,0.00063078647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010893943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027868794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09036831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013422496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016573632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122001626","doi":"","title":"National Data Sets: Sources of Information for Canadian Child Care Data","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Child care; Health care; Survey data collection; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Business","score_opus":0.13231801194989126,"score_gpt":0.4139857164589235,"score_spread":0.2816677045090322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122001626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19865866,0.034432933,0.0007319302,0.08707626,0.0014659347,0.0053208247,0.040648192,0.00027807453,0.6313872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934821,0.0020971603,0.0005351414,0.0002967059,0.0004316912,0.00003124437,0.0025706033,0.0000101370015,0.000545183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734145,0.00015535868,0.00033872796,0.00030946807,0.0012132423,0.00064173737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682766,0.00053172314,0.000053157666,0.0005929364,0.0018385926,0.00015590333],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002115844,0.00011345453,0.00023534324,0.00020204151,0.0018303542,0.000161111,0.0012662876,0.00009879992,0.000035866782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003304064,0.00010074769,0.000037671627,0.00068037957,0.0012099305,0.0018456406,0.00054564193,0.00018641459,0.000013170526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011313756,0.00010860903,0.092615575,0.000655056,0.00066940155,0.000004158228,0.04062877,0.00020623989,0.00000451897,0.5930919,0.26318088,0.008721795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028991723,0.00005936442,0.05666869,0.000036339632,0.00003071725,6.146794e-7,0.11658779,0.00066263863,0.0000018403038,0.009447488,0.8160401,0.00017446901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14796734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84362763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79482347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021183523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011690123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122037682","doi":"","title":"The Role of Law in Public Health: The Case of Family Planning in the Philippines","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Family planning; Government (linguistics); Health law; Politics; Family law; Business; Order (exchange); Public health; Public policy; Law; Service delivery framework; Service (business); Public administration; Economic growth; Political science; Health policy; Health care; Population; Economics; Medicine; Environmental health; International health; Research methodology; Nursing; Marketing; Finance","score_opus":0.025926078311617903,"score_gpt":0.299426589526283,"score_spread":0.27350051121466507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122037682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9649697,0.0180406,0.00009210113,0.006025316,0.00009242037,0.0001751613,0.0000027727556,0.0000051786396,0.01059677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99663854,0.0028863063,0.000008458224,0.00021434847,0.00016926932,0.0000045239162,8.455889e-7,0.000006425179,0.0000712883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710256,0.0007174037,0.00041146565,0.000092153554,0.00029981777,0.0013765856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916524,0.0003247614,0.00025154246,0.00015005883,0.00007960211,0.000028777471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008320978,0.000083722305,0.00014564217,0.00006964984,0.00080891507,0.00006826359,0.00055474363,0.0000543599,0.0000012377758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006571923,0.000044019413,0.00006707338,0.0004988244,0.0003089487,0.000118924996,0.000021702588,0.000959954,4.2608323e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070926194,0.00005683949,0.018313983,0.0000019857025,0.000012203708,0.000007237521,0.017543394,0.00017916797,0.000030970594,0.95774585,0.000019532874,0.0060817623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032868917,0.000100987716,0.021406015,0.000015230584,0.000005387089,0.00015622062,0.43087202,0.0002377916,0.0000016875185,0.53645784,0.010343839,0.00007432735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039072763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35823804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.421288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033460231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022723852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9673261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122104905","doi":"","title":"Low-fee ($5/day/child) Regulated Childcare Policy and the Labor Supply of Mothers with Young Children: A Natural Experiment from Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Subsidy; Natural experiment; Christian ministry; Demographic economics; Government (linguistics); Labour supply; Business; Socioeconomics; Demography; Geography; Economics; Labour economics; Political science; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.007105381705656488,"score_gpt":0.26565321866360664,"score_spread":0.25854783695795014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122104905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676786,0.00144637,3.3802743e-7,0.0027069415,0.00029580566,0.0013304189,0.0006193223,0.000026040767,0.025896173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98714924,0.010681879,0.00018084001,0.00025140043,0.0006148197,0.000091807786,0.00015631643,0.000060674683,0.0008130249],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628973,0.000752375,0.0005722385,0.0008468361,0.00061895134,0.0009198565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997882,0.00045594992,0.00029176555,0.0008975117,0.00021840331,0.00025435348],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012940106,0.00038381337,0.00067177875,0.00025959517,0.0005477625,0.00018835756,0.0010618767,0.00037313913,0.000039809398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034226826,0.0003090805,0.00011504139,0.00029956346,0.00168321,0.000096804084,0.0005630945,0.0013987562,4.930558e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015524903,0.00046652992,0.6805597,0.0001632493,0.0021692135,0.00004685863,0.21321711,0.023639694,0.0001156986,0.018973904,0.00034993305,0.05874565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040399567,0.00007419457,0.9193073,0.00050647394,0.00004566134,0.000009272309,0.06867068,0.002669503,0.00012822916,0.0009119708,0.002669637,0.00096712133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78254783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8732675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23874763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019571425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005029619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122107157","doi":"","title":"Keeping in Touch – A Benefit of Public Holidays","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"German; Social benefits; Business; Leisure time; Advertising; Demographic economics; Economics; Geography; Physical activity","score_opus":0.031095819333201966,"score_gpt":0.2723820977213241,"score_spread":0.24128627838812214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122107157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8064478,0.001464615,0.00023982978,0.00036577077,0.0035311654,0.00063429266,0.000251635,0.00014855337,0.18691632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946937,0.0005036649,0.0014280354,0.00018411026,0.00071556534,0.00009597375,0.000101420876,0.00006270884,0.0022148455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548054,0.0003748913,0.0012777145,0.001044616,0.00065495976,0.0011672806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971704,0.00036130537,0.0008470188,0.00091689866,0.00036231818,0.00034209297],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017633478,0.00054886506,0.0011385885,0.0008854538,0.00037248578,0.00023532068,0.0012643961,0.0011440285,0.00047326318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038667797,0.0006843942,0.0004565374,0.0006073801,0.0010766068,0.00032775485,0.0005565727,0.0011191432,0.000080042024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004755315,0.0001876198,0.9634119,0.00011882317,0.000069276015,0.000022405964,0.00584433,0.00032208575,0.0000187485,0.028012186,0.0010464056,0.0009414559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010887244,0.000051182324,0.95814073,0.00044076366,0.000091421956,0.000011079508,0.008920091,0.00058416167,0.000024730556,0.01476833,0.014310898,0.0015678636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014719806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054523356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18824586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011656594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026683311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122192337","doi":"","title":"Closing the Gender Gap in Corporate Advancement: Insights and Solutions from Behavioural Economics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Public relations; Scholarship; Incentive; Political science; Bounded rationality; Marketing; Economics; Business; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.056480691014318164,"score_gpt":0.27545515351634164,"score_spread":0.2189744625020235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122192337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990887,0.0032265603,0.002801965,0.0006941913,0.00047654644,0.00011299132,0.0000055687633,0.000012896741,0.0017822951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835568,0.015401705,0.00011387272,0.00017890822,0.0004785998,0.0000028405477,0.000004328644,0.000011070856,0.00025189124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797225,0.00017383549,0.00022630753,0.0001694808,0.00013111188,0.0013270172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995014,0.00004544372,0.00018724063,0.00010965065,0.00007697075,0.00007927091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010315642,0.00010636729,0.00011560538,0.00006821551,0.001225626,0.00012765478,0.00022696579,0.000078284924,0.000016664859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002339523,0.00008625298,0.000040118066,0.00015911378,0.00035047394,0.00030260475,0.000041724208,0.00072208565,0.000009156823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022214392,0.00005158074,0.10865693,6.7577713e-7,0.000058857157,0.0000019114286,0.021053705,0.00005032901,0.0001013045,0.8651066,0.00002311536,0.0048727957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005561639,0.000084030056,0.060129493,0.000007730144,0.000036327598,0.00001398534,0.051254667,0.0006566642,0.0000046895952,0.88501877,0.002059766,0.00017774235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018946246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13139454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12949991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082428445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015456689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9426648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122218336","doi":"10.5282/ubm/epub.17196","title":"Affirmative Action: One Size Does Not Fit All","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pennsylvania State University; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; York University; Yale University","keywords":"Counterintuitive; Download; Disadvantaged; Welfare; Developing country; Rationing; Subsidy; Economics; Work (physics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Affirmative action; Action (physics); Public economics; Microeconomics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.06618158019091601,"score_gpt":0.35003975910539903,"score_spread":0.283858178914483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122218336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7882476,0.000015659489,0.0000022084114,0.0034856773,0.00037562737,0.0005032448,0.000016474447,0.000049940732,0.20730358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97412413,0.0061127855,0.0006541757,0.00045364627,0.00034461883,0.000121739955,0.0000048449665,0.000022753811,0.018161278],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769956,0.0003839543,0.00032276128,0.00040794595,0.00035565,0.00083010294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800205,0.001090088,0.00008377276,0.000365878,0.00019198244,0.00026620136],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014578167,0.00014292129,0.00024310479,0.0001397184,0.00045779694,0.00022639862,0.00048313843,0.00021342427,0.0009839757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000799003,0.00013069864,0.00008191068,0.0002024239,0.0005535294,0.00046398796,0.00013612119,0.00051989796,0.00014620103],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024234729,0.0016414004,0.14050473,0.00021611662,0.00059775385,0.00004315637,0.1469502,0.002163774,0.0068228925,0.049112145,0.0029664915,0.648739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018804788,0.0002609591,0.37758055,0.000085411586,0.000019311334,0.0000030497251,0.2612932,0.005768527,0.00051216886,0.01709525,0.33429503,0.0012060415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002042989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008184961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64753294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073785183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036636292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122229510","doi":"10.1111/iere.12395","title":"FERTILITY SHOCKS AND EQUILIBRIUM MARRIAGE‐RATE DYNAMICS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Fertility; Matching (statistics); Economics; Demographic economics; Sex ratio; Marital status; Affect (linguistics); Demography; Econometrics; Psychology; Statistics; Sociology; Mathematics; Population","score_opus":0.022051082899921488,"score_gpt":0.300613739874113,"score_spread":0.2785626569741915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122229510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8111568,0.0064142346,0.00008024938,0.0043892586,0.0028813023,0.00042395398,0.000082749866,0.00004306519,0.17452836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95959866,0.03084871,0.0001147963,0.0016688793,0.00015051404,0.0000158246,0.000059662823,0.000013282447,0.007529655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899447,0.0001083147,0.00032214748,0.00028359925,0.000107800224,0.00018364497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993992,0.00012860914,0.00012781311,0.00019341486,0.000060443013,0.0000905628],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009133064,0.00010779542,0.00023361474,0.000034505272,0.000055995024,0.00009089999,0.00035349652,0.0000622663,0.001526258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011067511,0.000109644156,0.0000833695,0.000038266942,0.000088347246,0.0002836548,0.00009438556,0.00009374287,0.00058816833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022141387,0.0000625633,0.681903,0.0006819659,0.00019088076,0.0000045676748,0.0010976477,0.00010742726,0.000033005243,0.2872433,0.0035691888,0.0250843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076929637,0.000047941507,0.44033107,0.0009338581,0.00007272596,0.000005594531,0.0012524435,0.031775627,0.0000027149545,0.020816622,0.5032426,0.0007494773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000516598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090162974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49967346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037857733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014732982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122270507","doi":"","title":"Estimation of Collective Household Models With Engel Curves","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engel curve; Econometrics; Equivalence (formal languages); Economics; Estimation; Nonlinear system; Scale (ratio); Contrast (vision); Resource (disambiguation); Microeconomics; Mathematics; Computer science; Price index; Geography","score_opus":0.07047610363417732,"score_gpt":0.3255542210000773,"score_spread":0.25507811736589997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122270507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.687335,0.00042815876,0.00023059594,0.00021750867,0.00024188682,0.0014334746,0.00018709665,0.000061617175,0.30986467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8978112,0.09715285,0.0022763624,0.000049996775,0.00009148662,0.00017154074,0.0000461551,0.000048010872,0.002352425],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717015,0.0004892708,0.00048449202,0.0006479799,0.00056247704,0.0006456261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815816,0.0005207172,0.00025935084,0.00060205674,0.00028701473,0.00017270067],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017850362,0.00023585945,0.00053272763,0.0004264017,0.0003612139,0.000064964755,0.0006665173,0.00044065557,0.000010035789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036782614,0.00024950472,0.00011077654,0.00034149006,0.0009906455,0.00019700007,0.0003318186,0.0010702028,0.0000011783591],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011323653,0.00027949846,0.008810139,0.00040257524,0.00014050439,0.000018264484,0.026802044,0.94018084,0.000005629134,0.00398693,0.00021865635,0.019041672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002817095,0.0006394303,0.04616382,0.0032555747,0.00009130052,0.000013898204,0.05242595,0.8229139,0.00009100157,0.06619719,0.0030497771,0.0023410965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019514646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038103058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30751225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015246423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042121788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122287852","doi":"","title":"Assessing the Impact of Taxes on Female Labor Supply Using a Finite Mixture Approach","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Monte Carlo method; Schedule; Substitution (logic); Preference; Tax revenue; Substitution effect; Labour supply; Econometrics; Revenue; Reduction (mathematics); Microeconomics; Mathematics; Computer science; Public economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.023145129385772685,"score_gpt":0.3258637025103183,"score_spread":0.30271857312454564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122287852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98972017,0.0013282184,0.0012353108,0.00021126523,0.00008929346,0.00013519131,0.000016729398,0.000016561246,0.0072472556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99502397,0.0027706649,0.0002864665,0.00008053661,0.00043482712,0.0000016081179,0.000003370374,0.000019792284,0.0013787877],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702424,0.00040575984,0.00025253734,0.000170352,0.00045169806,0.001695399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929005,0.00013655017,0.00018752503,0.00017424789,0.00012031774,0.00009132474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021810746,0.00016217562,0.0002130866,0.00008306971,0.0009527806,0.00022815992,0.00042357913,0.00013053906,0.00010678691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000916429,0.000105149054,0.00021872799,0.00053260656,0.00018674342,0.00032191843,0.000012507335,0.0013577105,0.0000054141337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029146875,0.001405849,0.5296507,0.000036955622,0.0014448663,0.000018623303,0.09352547,0.11125578,0.0028739295,0.1870984,0.0004391823,0.07195876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029412867,0.00159502,0.36071917,0.00022411848,0.00038004472,0.00036327224,0.37598544,0.02931514,0.000055447425,0.22454976,0.002447077,0.0014242257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002447182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091633986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28245997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081960676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042898133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7609945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122299953","doi":"","title":"New Reform Strategies and Welfare Participation in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Sanctions; Work (physics); Demographics; Welfare reform; Economics; Demographic economics; Percentage point; Public economics; Point (geometry); Labour economics; Political science; Market economy; Demography; Finance","score_opus":0.03470258059964492,"score_gpt":0.33428940852689676,"score_spread":0.29958682792725183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122299953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8413252,0.00007679687,0.0000017327245,0.0012324508,0.00052108394,0.00038206784,0.00002472047,0.000013061893,0.15642288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921501,0.0063537774,0.00030017478,0.000038663336,0.00017859961,0.000058129815,0.00003049826,0.000020875475,0.0008691528],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977765,0.00021600087,0.00041164647,0.00052649714,0.00031355163,0.000755793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895424,0.00014562721,0.00010734207,0.0004137415,0.00008801524,0.00029100777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014105374,0.00017597032,0.0003074823,0.00021692047,0.00026654964,0.00029602274,0.00045811615,0.00042119098,0.00008101134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021562145,0.00019558294,0.00003497467,0.00013964663,0.00022338398,0.00020927751,0.0003582012,0.0015438888,0.0000010280407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008192193,0.00010522529,0.43827778,0.00025745426,0.00006798413,0.00007726894,0.030559435,0.011472016,0.00003166298,0.0879062,0.00009474616,0.43106833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005081559,0.000031856733,0.7290131,0.00008984415,0.000006298606,8.283108e-7,0.21979772,0.004963564,0.000003792776,0.014493413,0.03054723,0.0005442215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9717403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4305241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038284275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013356173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122326121","doi":"","title":"Increased paid maternitiy leave and children's development measured at age four to five. An empirical analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Lirias (KU Leuven)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Psychology; Matching (statistics); Developmental psychology; Selection bias; Demography; Medicine","score_opus":0.06924922789609607,"score_gpt":0.3055351705830094,"score_spread":0.23628594268691333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122326121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992387,0.00012896133,0.0011180897,0.00033609624,0.00065559015,0.0007974307,0.00018846244,0.00022836457,0.0041599995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98877954,0.0001171403,0.005615251,0.0009359985,0.00046103125,0.00010654096,0.0005771423,0.00006114919,0.0033461882],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953301,0.00090034126,0.00064845564,0.0012716849,0.0010072389,0.0008421734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976061,0.00009613447,0.00029943557,0.0008228195,0.00026706993,0.00090843264],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015776305,0.000582439,0.0009647756,0.00052456337,0.0007905414,0.00032415046,0.0008937991,0.0007952144,0.00028681764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023050347,0.0005918941,0.00029965778,0.00064847304,0.000248956,0.0001544283,0.0010045383,0.0005431308,0.00013240337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016036241,0.00031201044,0.8441534,0.00006825151,0.0020443553,0.00013398103,0.14822777,0.00031506366,0.00004572068,0.0004916187,0.0011910979,0.0028563957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043602503,0.000058586356,0.9888842,0.000055240165,0.0007165273,0.0000030111687,0.0027907277,0.00013421549,0.000029364102,0.0017608915,0.0041898284,0.00094134937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01688229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052046042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14543703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006227514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006612264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122349365","doi":"","title":"A Collective Retirement Model : Identification and Estimation in the Presence of Externalities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology","keywords":"Spouse; Earnings; Economics; Externality; Margin (machine learning); Estimation; Social security; Structural estimation; Identification (biology); Panel data; Health and Retirement Study; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Political science; Finance; Sociology","score_opus":0.027364369650484797,"score_gpt":0.2830684505053776,"score_spread":0.2557040808548928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122349365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827707,0.0002560336,0.006330498,0.00045668342,0.00022998189,0.00041362486,0.000023063169,0.000019075207,0.009500357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975727,0.00012231256,0.0013356381,0.00007384229,0.000027587577,0.000048956732,0.0000029452385,0.00000526777,0.0008107235],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988733,0.00015187143,0.000310266,0.00020847257,0.00026963488,0.00018646654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999345,0.00015946389,0.00017408798,0.00018022716,0.000097624674,0.00004358465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009437672,0.00009293545,0.00014041325,0.000103605445,0.00027960498,0.00006657263,0.00021244919,0.00007377038,0.000015775917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021689592,0.00008579303,0.000036225232,0.0002153142,0.0005493339,0.0002891436,0.000023090166,0.00009782068,0.000004341787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015480553,0.00011779441,0.65906477,0.000032125816,0.000018474138,0.000001957763,0.21234775,0.007117876,0.00027029775,0.12062739,0.00012500612,0.0002610971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008521784,0.00006207715,0.7981242,0.00010754631,0.000035840276,0.0000049551595,0.065834135,0.027262788,0.00016347467,0.10720347,0.00007107271,0.00027825125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015421171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042139348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14651361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038936918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007975326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3498538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122360623","doi":"","title":"Canadian Evidence on Ten Years of Universal Preschool Policies: the Good and the Bad","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Cognitive development; Child development; Economics; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economic growth; Medicine; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.03125555676322755,"score_gpt":0.31110781379161395,"score_spread":0.2798522570283864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122360623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8393672,0.00030344282,3.9093797e-7,0.005271565,0.00029314475,0.0011964747,0.000063194784,0.000011521731,0.15349303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96335167,0.03204678,0.000035919355,0.0002443506,0.00017655324,0.000067442044,0.0000038164867,0.000020796942,0.0040526656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732965,0.0008990062,0.00030315423,0.00042773315,0.00035632716,0.0006841113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663186,0.0020141639,0.00013541336,0.0008027739,0.00014632454,0.000269486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003542351,0.00015765801,0.0003008618,0.00026110306,0.0004443287,0.0002308491,0.0013987353,0.00032526383,0.000048477625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014451753,0.00011962094,0.00010007537,0.00017622781,0.0018014458,0.000105823834,0.00053195964,0.001220371,0.000009306214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033412766,0.00015251737,0.23627904,0.0002382468,0.00057047844,0.00003355589,0.21426871,0.014082138,0.000025399915,0.3688555,0.001996445,0.16316383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001633662,0.00019181696,0.6631815,0.0008076334,0.00005915719,0.0000029636503,0.21273491,0.008921465,0.000004935924,0.02579374,0.085766725,0.00090151955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59304595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5495021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42690244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012330632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032285699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66375023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122366030","doi":"","title":"School Competition and Efficiency with Publicly Funded Catholic Schools","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Productivity; Incentive; Test (biology); Demographic economics; School choice; School system; Economics; Psychology; Mathematics education; Political science; Economic growth; Pedagogy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01216616443227759,"score_gpt":0.24550644260671878,"score_spread":0.2333402781744412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122366030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838163,0.0015345623,0.0055881925,0.001336136,0.00012780841,0.0001619875,0.000002052819,0.00006345398,0.0073694726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98591757,0.011520139,0.00018144472,0.00018220149,0.0003286631,0.0000047287094,0.0000031269758,0.000016091886,0.001846049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969946,0.00017784469,0.00019822519,0.00022815615,0.00050967175,0.0018914915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921006,0.00003152584,0.00012609256,0.00013273823,0.00021320283,0.00028638486],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014591845,0.00014316842,0.0001654214,0.00015008333,0.001619965,0.00017916891,0.00026424625,0.0000991937,0.000029099932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012244147,0.00012151452,0.00004873255,0.00046187735,0.00027161397,0.00047496395,0.000022136455,0.0015931153,0.000031223917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003930416,0.00016252733,0.40827414,0.0000065612135,0.00008576326,0.000022110326,0.0076799127,0.000058780734,0.00014059218,0.58138984,0.00010308587,0.0020373778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005847922,0.0021257743,0.5660423,0.00010982468,0.00015687908,0.00451794,0.19818017,0.00038471454,0.000017066899,0.20075679,0.020262703,0.001597918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015091376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016349869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38063306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080179947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004951593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122385177","doi":"","title":"The Gender Pay Gap across Countries: A Human Capital Approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Affect (linguistics); Economics; Human capital; Gender pay gap; Labour economics; Neglect; Demographic economics; Gender gap; Collective bargaining; Work (physics); Economic growth; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.048766918958829314,"score_gpt":0.35582061817568,"score_spread":0.30705369921685066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122385177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6848864,0.00012710832,0.000008120286,0.00058758794,0.00019481694,0.00040961837,0.000019286339,0.00004318403,0.3137239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859618,0.0060878857,0.00012847914,0.0002572604,0.00034863022,0.000044039924,0.000012194253,0.00002099787,0.0071386895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969192,0.0003757147,0.00037446988,0.00048979,0.000468477,0.0013723116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858755,0.00039706123,0.00008067403,0.00054961134,0.00015473094,0.00023040055],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004191597,0.00016799555,0.0002228678,0.00008515268,0.0025560292,0.00049363397,0.0008705286,0.00022732683,0.000028273085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027962148,0.00012750273,0.000103233266,0.00024227319,0.0011448675,0.0002094233,0.00011339342,0.00066818786,0.000019414783],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012280453,0.00061365083,0.15344939,0.00004769716,0.00014493261,0.00004299025,0.2376621,0.0014767144,0.00016018953,0.5024992,0.00085520773,0.1029251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014075434,0.00022440791,0.24843453,0.000019811141,0.000008738295,0.0000074657364,0.4436084,0.0019076401,0.000010766474,0.045218606,0.2583322,0.0008198782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004281707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003468036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4572806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073526584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005369096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122395860","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1071081","title":"An Analysis of Effective Marginal Tax Rates in Quebec","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Microsimulation; Redistribution (election); Population; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Distribution (mathematics); Income tax; Public economics; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.005701767040166683,"score_gpt":0.2893832759908468,"score_spread":0.2836815089506801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122395860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837296,0.0006769791,0.013407954,0.000100178375,0.00011682869,0.00011732215,0.000003338731,0.000011731237,0.0018360765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979464,0.0010158007,0.00008230141,0.00003507148,0.0001499374,0.0000017356431,0.0000048504867,0.00000854487,0.0007553525],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970895,0.00032607422,0.00030407048,0.00017129835,0.0003734289,0.0017356335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992785,0.00014723354,0.00018225731,0.00011846959,0.0001560064,0.00011753031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061610825,0.00011007269,0.00027598292,0.0005786518,0.00022640493,0.00004718776,0.00030589232,0.00011223373,0.000030391018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009001481,0.00010397771,0.00015082308,0.0015795571,0.00014717506,0.00026661245,0.000010590851,0.00084080163,0.0000027134267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075075164,0.0001479834,0.8088026,0.0000022686309,0.000437991,0.000007555272,0.008968642,0.00066555315,0.00040621703,0.16626926,0.0000040784607,0.0142127955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042255234,0.00021078673,0.880633,0.000006844727,0.0002326672,0.0000037572322,0.08712072,0.0006271483,0.00003383331,0.030363996,0.0001853079,0.00015941117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08795731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90700305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8190457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016787447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019956026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9181161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122448707","doi":"10.3386/w23920","title":"Reported Effects vs. Revealed-Preference Estimates: Evidence from the propensity to spend tax rebates","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada; Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; University of Chicago","keywords":"Preference; Propensity score matching; Economics; Econometrics; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.536996076142086,"score_gpt":0.5212277288487721,"score_spread":0.01576834729331389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122448707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91405815,0.0011327573,0.000077814264,0.010000452,0.0015877311,0.0033075165,0.00028448703,0.000053816566,0.069497265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99223924,0.0017216684,0.0015125765,0.0000895324,0.0009902326,0.00017840638,0.00014829176,0.000024158147,0.003095917],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532926,0.00084631296,0.0006530099,0.0009981233,0.0015893097,0.00058401213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902183,0.005719448,0.0006137305,0.0012472305,0.0019553644,0.00024596474],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0101677915,0.00025850107,0.00057262846,0.00021698809,0.0011462212,0.0005911526,0.0028642975,0.00045066074,0.0001323234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023121784,0.00021608116,0.00015077215,0.00015534293,0.000947258,0.00031313248,0.001598621,0.0011391848,0.0002382554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005598115,0.0002685126,0.5731783,0.00059942517,0.0008557836,0.000079608944,0.027377166,0.004618854,0.0011383719,0.27854085,0.11033951,0.0024437828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016741731,0.00006138204,0.30655614,0.00085618015,0.000029121382,9.599152e-7,0.0003587756,0.0009257012,0.00015084835,0.68998784,0.00063764816,0.00026801502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10136797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025923723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41144696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001149357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044577573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122461765","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1818735","title":"Does Privatization Deliver? Access to Telephone Services and Household Income in Poor Rural Areas Using a Quasi-Natural Experiment in Peru","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Natural experiment; Rural area; Natural (archaeology); Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Geography; Economics; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.013679076426970799,"score_gpt":0.28530316158072533,"score_spread":0.2716240851537545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122461765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99622613,0.0015326528,0.0006289281,0.0010082745,0.00027141676,0.00025792178,0.0000021402466,0.000023960498,0.00004859301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624836,0.0026303097,0.00031373036,0.00033450586,0.00036780312,0.0000063505972,0.0000024025467,0.000017756047,0.000078798264],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974983,0.00016658135,0.00033220768,0.00020730043,0.00038170945,0.0014139287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999539,0.000030417807,0.00012416573,0.0000895143,0.00009578014,0.00012109327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010561856,0.00016032148,0.00020085505,0.00029545758,0.00031419288,0.00025809303,0.0003725249,0.000097706274,0.0000066592966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036050984,0.00012420883,0.00003573625,0.0005709301,0.00004962536,0.0008793936,0.000088099725,0.0006810134,0.000001217405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092365895,0.00020868662,0.9325245,0.000017048518,0.00003740492,0.0000058292067,0.045355022,0.003514576,0.0022647602,0.0071308683,0.00000294627,0.008845988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029302442,0.00025323353,0.6868128,0.0003042922,0.000034369245,0.00005291466,0.27434862,0.014117974,0.00026503898,0.01947931,0.00048220463,0.00091894646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077543682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19494365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24571165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021164154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081511214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122483111","doi":"","title":"Female labour force participation in an era of organizational and technological change","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Economics; Wage; Human capital; Labour economics; Labour supply; Humanities; Political science; Market economy; Art; Economic growth","score_opus":0.02604645584244674,"score_gpt":0.3029127873547098,"score_spread":0.27686633151226303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122483111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99674785,0.001189028,0.001344227,0.0003775942,0.00006766617,0.00008803192,0.0000018833281,0.00001610787,0.00016763763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708927,0.0023800288,0.00013477774,0.000060761467,0.00020738642,0.0000045529146,0.0000028547536,0.0000064616306,0.00011391892],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984715,0.00012209016,0.0001515708,0.00007804022,0.00019203642,0.0009847875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967426,0.000026119204,0.00008243953,0.000051131403,0.00008939896,0.000076628225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016165503,0.000058337886,0.000093053575,0.00006277071,0.00017636584,0.000019573306,0.00011212782,0.000106297724,0.000023871075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012951542,0.000053083382,0.000014539779,0.00033383808,0.00011010411,0.00038281275,0.000017517117,0.00053153135,0.0000019505735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036024305,0.00006622909,0.5508583,0.0000013427652,0.000004298466,1.455772e-7,0.0053158747,0.0000024832261,0.00013955175,0.44080678,2.8727507e-7,0.0028010923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003531507,0.00015541173,0.83099854,0.000009003208,0.000012006127,0.0000119670285,0.046865724,0.00010608849,0.000034426193,0.121178426,0.00015212028,0.00012312255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017008276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005262538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31962836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024303953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004176255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29366198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122551343","doi":"","title":"Are Intra-Household Allocations Policy Neutral? Theory and Empirical Evidence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Alimony; Cohabitation; Beneficiary; Economics; Matching (statistics); Remarriage; Quality (philosophy); Legislature; Demographic economics; Affect (linguistics); Labour economics; Empirical evidence; Spouse; Public economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.16168947778897805,"score_gpt":0.396583597402362,"score_spread":0.23489411961338394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122551343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91013885,0.0006942285,0.000023079117,0.0028066803,0.0004950996,0.0009057352,0.0000607874,0.00010694434,0.0847686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9338171,0.061928686,0.0002798653,0.0006108338,0.0006137329,0.0001515142,0.000009829224,0.000056111017,0.002532348],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956721,0.0014952738,0.0005289582,0.00097404077,0.00030005618,0.001029579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965721,0.0016063297,0.0002523697,0.00092382083,0.00019233373,0.00045306122],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005282108,0.00029364432,0.000466933,0.0005838618,0.0006045329,0.00029872786,0.001117065,0.0007252511,0.00003931554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033570423,0.0003221436,0.00013306421,0.00031615034,0.0016106335,0.00022250574,0.00095262623,0.0017712681,0.00001052128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024987583,0.0005983044,0.5175274,0.00047163386,0.0002708005,0.00008138595,0.08122429,0.005055222,0.00004867769,0.31493548,0.00076482835,0.07877211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005426165,0.00011009499,0.6504309,0.00075909734,0.00004450305,0.000008138969,0.06424449,0.0010148427,0.000015464975,0.25909814,0.022386214,0.0013454511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026903558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013259479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13290355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011120844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002715786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122569911","doi":"","title":"Explaining the MENA Paradox: Rising Educational Attainment, Yet Stagnant Female Labor Force Participation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Educational attainment; Economics; Labour economics; Wage; Private sector; Multinomial logistic regression; Demographic economics; Public sector; Informal sector; Survey data collection; Work (physics); Economic growth; Economy","score_opus":0.06747594399026174,"score_gpt":0.38831205718028616,"score_spread":0.3208361131900244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122569911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94196105,0.00018302363,0.00002768436,0.0027597465,0.0012278004,0.0009948408,0.00008224509,0.00005169447,0.05271191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98648953,0.0073386333,0.0006448988,0.00026502376,0.0009504823,0.00047778228,0.0000943337,0.00006282431,0.0036764871],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959206,0.0009292314,0.00063459115,0.0007914665,0.00061314966,0.0011109378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690104,0.0014528206,0.0003052901,0.0008053753,0.00029671067,0.00023877827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005520521,0.00026042847,0.00034052666,0.000230286,0.0011111419,0.00042290176,0.0009424753,0.00036376284,0.00012685954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011644197,0.0002422507,0.00012157555,0.00025166123,0.0009088396,0.00019024288,0.00061862724,0.0010180918,0.000020580492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019484283,0.0007786262,0.58779985,0.0002982966,0.00039510874,0.000015637535,0.23509791,0.022068663,0.00011176221,0.07364537,0.0017777596,0.07781615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015168651,0.00027462788,0.48985952,0.0008105604,0.00008178567,0.0000032193097,0.26121792,0.045584556,0.00008034349,0.072557114,0.12605278,0.0019607178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009525706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046176966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124275014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016729597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024624737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9878697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122586999","doi":"","title":"Employment And Child-Care Choices In Canada And The United States","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Subsidy; Demographic economics; Wage; Economics; Labour economics; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.006465854063866595,"score_gpt":0.23471928130402786,"score_spread":0.22825342724016126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122586999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874202,0.008348441,0.000042665597,0.0029451954,0.00009319343,0.00010694048,0.0000022811118,0.000005997693,0.0010350822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91300786,0.08620787,0.000004382363,0.00040725688,0.00008836048,0.000002224635,0.000003599084,0.0000058372348,0.00027259515],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827737,0.0001807228,0.00014045,0.00010528048,0.00023676748,0.0010594148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996687,0.00007973281,0.00006259516,0.00005648292,0.000052542255,0.0000799427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008745558,0.000083185194,0.00010822189,0.000061674145,0.00056011847,0.00008045982,0.00014919662,0.00003076057,0.0000052706614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032604843,0.000057900226,0.000016205531,0.00025857298,0.00013561276,0.00008163311,0.000021256576,0.0006451951,2.836851e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005108923,0.000013265505,0.888732,0.0000038645157,0.000059583712,0.000008098283,0.023762625,0.0002450059,6.0942966e-7,0.080863215,0.00002501728,0.006235636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026346522,0.0000864352,0.2871828,0.000032880303,0.00003664278,0.000104207305,0.6031159,0.00050716044,4.6772865e-7,0.07567788,0.030371249,0.0002497261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9548311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60154915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010857539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029858523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5296774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122679873","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.968596","title":"Raising Taxes through Equalization","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Equalization (audio); Economics; Computer science; Business; Mathematics; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.029784593990347132,"score_gpt":0.32713210487145333,"score_spread":0.2973475108811062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122679873","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41731015,0.0022512123,0.5440754,0.0006088997,0.0007770411,0.00009882242,0.0000014507501,0.0000620437,0.034814976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887784,0.0065101725,0.00034019738,0.00026654892,0.00089411245,5.0545003e-7,0.000002877914,0.000015694037,0.003191473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968079,0.00013191311,0.00025229855,0.0001359343,0.00043691762,0.0022350755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994634,0.00007549628,0.00014735624,0.00008647227,0.00014273687,0.00008456446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004501531,0.00009847913,0.000111092486,0.0000734378,0.0009574228,0.00010746246,0.00023657815,0.0001143465,0.000034659643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016984843,0.00009531197,0.00007609985,0.00037984332,0.00010415468,0.000381898,0.00001562586,0.00076945144,0.000017377446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010291603,0.000028278739,0.008888308,0.000001536921,0.000032555723,0.0000026281418,0.011928044,0.00004010294,0.00022520788,0.96968675,0.00009573472,0.0090605505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037147445,0.00008299314,0.0030144237,0.00001168687,0.000023177676,0.000036168407,0.08191987,0.00002666506,0.000033657074,0.8894626,0.024815297,0.00020200519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095524796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020544728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5714683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010047738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019740444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122685639","doi":"","title":"Welfare Reforms and Consumption Among Single Mother Households: Evidence From Canadian Provinces","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Consumption (sociology); Propensity score matching; Difference in differences; Demographic economics; Matching (statistics); Welfare reform; Population; Significant difference; Economics; Work (physics); Demography; Geography; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Medicine; Econometrics","score_opus":0.05340280201983094,"score_gpt":0.31271210162511426,"score_spread":0.2593092996052833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122685639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93938774,0.0006499367,0.0000015166505,0.001260997,0.00039186823,0.00085762807,0.00019279392,0.000058369445,0.057199143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641038,0.032827467,0.00044738848,0.00008656282,0.0004012594,0.00009774657,0.00004423994,0.00005202052,0.0019395275],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677205,0.00039956707,0.00046730976,0.00095772074,0.00038722504,0.001016137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981364,0.00032458428,0.0001827719,0.00066076784,0.00013242464,0.0005630363],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002012587,0.0002814587,0.0004005759,0.0003637457,0.0007078091,0.0005141783,0.00080786756,0.0007641756,0.00015234147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052613474,0.00029461947,0.0000851245,0.0001198621,0.0011695015,0.0004002772,0.00040512808,0.0011573986,0.000010765431],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028846816,0.000068977955,0.8867461,0.00009727034,0.00006214669,0.000026741505,0.017276386,0.0016695072,0.000030788804,0.00061626575,0.000041419476,0.09333556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037952518,0.000068024376,0.93337214,0.00072097883,0.000020626709,0.0000014323407,0.026459731,0.003744652,0.000011438488,0.0020616532,0.032306563,0.0008532081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5571694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96257055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40540114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004028677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001894336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122705635","doi":"","title":"Did Canadian welfare reform work? The effects of new reform strategies on social assistance participation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Political science; Demographics; Humanities; Welfare economics; Sociology; Economics; Demography; Law; Art","score_opus":0.022589134963703874,"score_gpt":0.29160792473873626,"score_spread":0.2690187897750324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122705635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94159263,0.0010794103,0.0002614019,0.009520011,0.00079117855,0.00020959265,0.0000030531871,0.000026210784,0.0465165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99690026,0.00068621873,0.000012457819,0.00012528461,0.00057026604,0.0000051284724,0.000003225566,0.0000129872415,0.0016841694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973046,0.00016705891,0.00022745109,0.0001268389,0.00052203494,0.0016519686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999215,0.000023455017,0.00018991962,0.0001252078,0.00017471885,0.0002716853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016655396,0.00012259316,0.00015620026,0.000075139964,0.00097387715,0.00011815807,0.00036695538,0.0001272258,0.000006896017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011848336,0.00008543477,0.00008268083,0.00039328047,0.00013263705,0.00025967244,0.000011434876,0.00086309155,0.0000071373274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059155947,0.0000321053,0.002621532,0.0000062705644,0.00007216516,0.0000027130814,0.020371124,0.00003297176,0.000006666971,0.95838773,0.0003493793,0.018058186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001298217,0.0007021318,0.21494028,0.00006142611,0.0001041854,0.000007241896,0.44429103,0.000024249355,0.000016584823,0.31795654,0.020193227,0.00040486408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20845093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87146425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66301334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066323453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011485196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122708129","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.650242","title":"Consumption Inequality and Intra-Household Allocations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Demographic economics; Mathematics; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.029316836540945274,"score_gpt":0.29185437993448154,"score_spread":0.2625375433935363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122708129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9692608,0.0014727579,0.026103081,0.0019427147,0.00021279031,0.00009615188,0.0000027287738,0.000051313313,0.0008576624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97990865,0.019221345,0.00017434909,0.00020300457,0.00022936518,0.0000024325254,0.0000025497286,0.000009346482,0.00024897396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981944,0.000121144294,0.00018581825,0.0001311348,0.0002385174,0.0011290095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959916,0.000033494238,0.000087069966,0.000087875545,0.00007509764,0.00011732618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018405698,0.0000827267,0.00009697494,0.00006253882,0.00071320403,0.00009117613,0.00014585047,0.000087969966,0.000008928504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008857124,0.000081504586,0.000038486378,0.0001493125,0.00017295923,0.00021659952,0.000014584698,0.0007723356,0.000011593137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056855056,0.00005122083,0.051008634,0.0000030696299,0.000035780162,9.606536e-7,0.0044899266,0.00016528928,0.00011536398,0.9418694,0.000014563569,0.0022401002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088375795,0.00010393595,0.075663276,0.000014454701,0.00004107062,0.00006525354,0.027983285,0.000024752631,0.000008130096,0.89336544,0.0016279699,0.00021869635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012196163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025969587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048503987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089788716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024235295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99180394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122715010","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2230801","title":"For Better or for Worse: The Long-Term Effects of Postwar Reconstruction on Family Formation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Economics; Psychology; Medicine; Keynesian economics; History; Physics","score_opus":0.011436348571614813,"score_gpt":0.26385170324410834,"score_spread":0.25241535467249354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122715010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94443613,0.0003900714,0.051758334,0.001280595,0.0007612992,0.0011204608,0.000004106333,0.00001721415,0.00023179795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99610317,0.001750057,0.0003552508,0.0003758546,0.0005349782,0.000088015746,0.0000056550343,0.000015271744,0.0007717223],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982365,0.00010865312,0.00025302012,0.00010989703,0.00021665734,0.0010753083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990298,0.00033953812,0.0002354947,0.00010398418,0.0002406552,0.00005050105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001125782,0.00010509663,0.00013851648,0.00007584039,0.0006124742,0.000078076366,0.0002313176,0.000101513324,0.000008487187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016703064,0.00006780926,0.00013391773,0.00013440785,0.000089436835,0.0003707844,0.000008016357,0.00039029642,0.000006662814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050973496,0.00020310856,0.019698214,0.0002224458,0.00040816434,6.8694806e-7,0.011461786,0.000052209365,0.004584943,0.16570663,0.0022225725,0.7949295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006479647,0.004983779,0.13725674,0.00034110318,0.000388015,0.00016672906,0.060357355,0.0016441834,0.0013466075,0.783408,0.0027807131,0.0008471645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012423577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014891155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79408234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044442323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077103014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47107187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122777388","doi":"","title":"Public- and Private-Sector Wage Differentials in Canada Revisited","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Public sector; Economic rent; Wage; Private sector; Labour economics; Payment; Government (linguistics); Business; Economics; Finance; Economic growth; Market economy; Economy","score_opus":0.01828479393897061,"score_gpt":0.24202859030758553,"score_spread":0.2237437963686149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122777388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99302757,0.002170654,0.00050277496,0.0015254205,0.00020883397,0.000117040036,0.0000033707338,0.000014511117,0.0024298113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765918,0.022125185,0.000018610539,0.00020809624,0.00022022547,0.000002023852,0.0000035018936,0.000012250294,0.0008182626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690884,0.00023285969,0.00025819553,0.00017417556,0.0003684237,0.0020575295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994814,0.000054780387,0.000107824715,0.00010348052,0.00007254272,0.00017997508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013240827,0.000119347395,0.00019199261,0.00010901532,0.0003629918,0.000129565,0.00026797722,0.00007095449,0.00008823826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012112818,0.00010945212,0.000035734985,0.00039913275,0.000053747124,0.00019814173,0.000029818095,0.0008701432,0.000002483591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011520757,0.00002824418,0.8450592,0.0000030377087,0.00004585687,0.000017652443,0.0009629504,0.0000030586662,0.00009980986,0.14826912,0.00009240831,0.005407118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014714459,0.000108328364,0.8051417,0.000038306433,0.00003882209,0.00011851622,0.030628756,0.00018930827,0.000003992287,0.13603467,0.025681881,0.00054429367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5712017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4225029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002723636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008300102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122872967","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02404.x","title":"Are Children Decision‐Makers within the Household?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Sample (material); Decision process; Economics; Psychology; Sociology; Demographic economics; Political science; Management science","score_opus":0.04618836763014875,"score_gpt":0.25324127196217083,"score_spread":0.2070529043320221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122872967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.982325,0.00019823402,0.00022780299,0.00072307565,0.0017508768,0.00012050865,0.000011370595,0.000025273903,0.014617855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99715537,0.00032214212,0.000254892,0.0008568611,0.0008439465,0.0000020120726,2.7956418e-7,0.000014790843,0.0005497106],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998997,0.00018554223,0.0002694019,0.00011958535,0.0001388998,0.00028961335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908805,0.00012124702,0.00037926133,0.0002620333,0.000026689746,0.0001226942],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020165392,0.00009972985,0.00012359355,0.000036376434,0.0014308847,0.00018133393,0.00089852506,0.00006578472,0.00027026644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073571144,0.000055508426,0.00010902283,0.000061550396,0.0003319065,0.00017155138,0.000055397617,0.00037264614,0.00016529436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007706011,0.000057195244,0.75344884,0.0000010032736,0.00029447093,0.000013575927,0.14315991,0.003240334,0.0000035657738,0.06596679,0.029421167,0.0043161055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032026702,0.000016443822,0.90131676,0.000010400371,0.000033738932,0.000076838514,0.04304785,0.00013565377,0.0000020219338,0.052452724,0.002444389,0.00014291797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089947635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002302007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14786793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019139193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029225845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122934544","doi":"10.34989/swp-2017-45","title":"Identification of Random Resource Shares in Collective Households Without Preference Similarity Restrictions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Revealed preference; Consumption (sociology); Poverty; Preference; Identification (biology); Economics; Resource (disambiguation); Inequality; Distribution (mathematics); Resource distribution; Similarity (geometry); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Resource allocation; Economic growth; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07308069339559325,"score_gpt":0.33900014083968416,"score_spread":0.2659194474440909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122934544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93958443,0.00021251815,0.00003628979,0.00020504756,0.00031928634,0.0012582949,0.00019095167,0.000040268536,0.058152925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808536,0.015495876,0.00021342488,0.000020645506,0.00010913967,0.0003004643,0.00008217499,0.000034680044,0.0028900017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519694,0.0016572953,0.00096078805,0.0009589217,0.0005493434,0.0006766868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970911,0.0010411246,0.00037590927,0.0008901675,0.0004376256,0.00016408441],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045445934,0.00023298772,0.0006239291,0.0006258113,0.00042607915,0.0002816189,0.0009220045,0.0007060511,0.00003430893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028870665,0.0002886367,0.00015910815,0.0008286226,0.0006907456,0.00017839529,0.0006531067,0.001702477,0.0000012337903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043696005,0.0008637615,0.85793567,0.00033270352,0.00017650714,0.000025617606,0.06661903,0.059825763,0.00043680178,0.001646035,0.00013867351,0.011562478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023906715,0.00007998064,0.8787973,0.00057068013,0.00003529374,0.0000012828974,0.091209136,0.015541711,0.00016850635,0.00674395,0.0036946444,0.00076687464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044614347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046406887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055262923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021893126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039574644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122962769","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3778806","title":"What is the Role of Firm-Specific Pay Policies on the Gender Earnings Gap in Canada?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Business; Demographic economics; Gender pay gap; Labour economics; Economics; Accounting; Wage","score_opus":0.01940180660000904,"score_gpt":0.24185006039874746,"score_spread":0.22244825379873842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122962769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93910646,0.006927197,0.00004499156,0.049442068,0.00026602956,0.00014984267,0.0000041364056,0.000007279025,0.004051974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701652,0.026305223,0.00000239764,0.0028688333,0.00027916147,0.000002485029,5.697137e-7,0.0000114618615,0.0003646956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743587,0.00029331984,0.00022861661,0.00013646921,0.0005763809,0.0013293567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993801,0.00017255996,0.00015471908,0.00013129863,0.00007546999,0.00008583853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012740281,0.000111802605,0.0001407661,0.000032842046,0.0005040524,0.000109256514,0.00059314363,0.00005096719,0.00007634974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067539884,0.000060381706,0.00007788879,0.00039576096,0.00012485763,0.00014372396,0.000031571417,0.0014836726,0.000007738926],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004871614,0.00004141366,0.18674783,0.0000041852577,0.00013488268,0.000003584869,0.19853523,0.0004917002,0.0002739917,0.6008306,0.0026893867,0.010198456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018453818,0.00007845307,0.035864584,0.000012935748,0.000011076872,0.000005523331,0.8143795,0.0001833366,0.000033123262,0.07920041,0.06991168,0.00013482329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40490082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8508508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6158443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010677556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071554226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122978317","doi":"10.3386/w27838","title":"Child Skill Production: Accounting for Parental and Market-Based Time and Goods Investments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Production (economics); Accounting; Business; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.16942282860255256,"score_gpt":0.4569853899337266,"score_spread":0.2875625613311741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122978317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0534052,0.0013962728,0.0000041266935,0.0055705695,0.0011121681,0.002183169,0.0006542898,0.000038814964,0.9356354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746809,0.003235586,0.0010973084,0.00014184405,0.0036740478,0.00019632254,0.0011483675,0.00006307494,0.015762525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975618,0.00016090406,0.00038304264,0.00054258766,0.0010243269,0.00032730514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981482,0.000530685,0.00022567998,0.00011423497,0.00083416066,0.00014701246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046713534,0.00015269966,0.00031455077,0.00029446898,0.00055366824,0.00012942858,0.00022698368,0.00027185577,0.00010843343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020890557,0.00016784124,0.000072947674,0.00015372227,0.00054526364,0.00017794689,0.00010127015,0.00032752808,0.0000082122615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043255955,0.0005534069,0.29027554,0.00239281,0.0012558871,0.0000059110475,0.006147226,0.00030209307,0.000100037905,0.19225918,0.49720705,0.009068298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003853679,0.00058719807,0.3233126,0.0008761088,0.0002012819,0.00003346395,0.0073968396,0.016108641,0.000073134644,0.25575244,0.3898967,0.0019078843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011323747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047221832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92127573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087938126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034918706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68443674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122982064","doi":"","title":"Nobody to Play with?: The Implications of Leisure Coordination","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Essex; Economic and Social Research Council; Sage Foundation","keywords":"nobody; Leisure time; Consistency (knowledge bases); Externality; Working hours; Leisure activity; Economics; Working time; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Psychology; Labour economics; Physical activity; Computer science; Work (physics); Medicine; Engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.05534654339996905,"score_gpt":0.381159795588692,"score_spread":0.325813252188723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122982064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95260715,0.00018790647,0.00009613077,0.029859778,0.0002885551,0.0011966575,0.00091854937,0.000012277736,0.014833001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99482703,0.0018941904,0.0020632623,0.00049548777,0.00031742724,0.00004509616,0.00002051361,0.000028668544,0.00030830168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928134,0.00035999896,0.0014018243,0.0014787524,0.0007464515,0.0031995443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899941,0.0014439808,0.0005057224,0.0011517531,0.002267173,0.0046372884],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012325263,0.0004461208,0.0010780287,0.0011368663,0.0013367145,0.00076216896,0.0026040275,0.00042794453,0.00009183712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038169192,0.000360822,0.00018924792,0.0014992518,0.016534038,0.0007874884,0.001529321,0.001247508,0.000013462439],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003951304,0.00017414332,0.052298523,0.000059117014,0.000027374224,4.5177705e-7,0.00028480554,0.00043582587,0.00032360552,0.9459682,0.000102155325,0.00028630224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001371171,0.0010668801,0.58964723,0.00022303849,0.000115978146,0.000017325441,0.012456075,0.005457461,0.0010161918,0.37831438,0.009163286,0.0011509982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01223029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00445889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56765383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012868312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013118912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123103308","doi":"","title":"Immigration And The Rate Of Population Mixing: Explorations With A Stylized Model","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Population; Immigration; Demographic economics; Population size; Econometrics; Leslie matrix; Geography; Economics; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.046047891529309416,"score_gpt":0.3275839522328312,"score_spread":0.2815360607035218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123103308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9696817,0.00008008715,0.0006273535,0.0018277245,0.0001167068,0.0010472509,0.00005171436,0.000022026219,0.026545484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98908544,0.008645802,0.00076542096,0.000032450753,0.00008532288,0.00018720039,0.000046862657,0.00002111272,0.0011303786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979444,0.0006973074,0.00039678917,0.00040019944,0.00022270526,0.0003385729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846816,0.00057315925,0.00023319744,0.0004299963,0.00021400208,0.00008150309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032399662,0.0001451902,0.0003179264,0.00021182184,0.00038308755,0.00012593048,0.00030603638,0.00023454156,0.000004810848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003626443,0.00010154534,0.000064160915,0.00012356068,0.00077992666,0.00018245887,0.00019549695,0.00042154564,6.241754e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014686119,0.00023750315,0.077248864,0.0002538464,0.00030050531,0.000004677661,0.12545799,0.14541814,0.0002763421,0.59558505,0.00005214764,0.05369635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049077645,0.00010598197,0.03240582,0.00044057542,0.000062261824,0.0000011231556,0.073008776,0.5928582,0.000028817103,0.294219,0.0011957121,0.0007659625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017484913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014898391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4474401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032337752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006483248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8313652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123126032","doi":"","title":"More or less unmarried. The impact of legal settings of cohabitation on labor market outcomes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Alimony; Affect (linguistics); Duration (music); Demographic economics; Economics; Labour economics; Business; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03966364587916425,"score_gpt":0.38214797818027024,"score_spread":0.342484332301106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123126032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92678696,0.000026343418,0.0000011266176,0.0010150719,0.00036812638,0.0008209853,0.00045828102,0.000018008885,0.0705051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99238455,0.0025567466,0.0002424087,0.000091711154,0.00018889665,0.000065151,0.00003738339,0.000041182586,0.0043919706],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966525,0.0008375177,0.00071063166,0.0005503362,0.0005771544,0.000671886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957998,0.0021628833,0.0004926023,0.0008581377,0.00053865806,0.00014796437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004878316,0.00027138565,0.000629854,0.00034235098,0.0002927667,0.00011695537,0.0011665598,0.00045740136,0.00014742902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027253374,0.00019298485,0.00030008677,0.0003066152,0.0016180505,0.00011511149,0.0004639573,0.00095226185,0.000002418168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008904169,0.00044175592,0.91738653,0.00038889833,0.0005573808,0.000012539039,0.039484695,0.007903035,0.00006629813,0.0058533484,0.0022887466,0.02472637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065167795,0.0003327409,0.91987,0.000252621,0.000021279258,8.022911e-7,0.06997913,0.003916107,0.00002416253,0.0024524021,0.002117798,0.00038128503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00588207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005524985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06611313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097249134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028029645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.889197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123165537","doi":"","title":"Universal childcare and long-term effects on child well-being: Evidence from Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Swenson College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota Duluth","keywords":"Subsidy; Term (time); Longitudinal data; Demographic economics; Psychology; Child development; Economics; Political science; Developmental psychology; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.023379795991680743,"score_gpt":0.29998822134617975,"score_spread":0.27660842535449903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123165537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8873096,0.0006597463,9.176552e-7,0.00093366904,0.001105515,0.00077420234,0.00007242996,0.00003498972,0.10910895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97235316,0.02545973,0.000054089465,0.00020557591,0.00066729315,0.000034061395,0.000082815895,0.000046495228,0.0010968033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961785,0.0007596452,0.00035120666,0.0011084619,0.0006749373,0.0009272619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688506,0.0013747354,0.00015423937,0.00081174215,0.00019042128,0.00058378954],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015602078,0.00034844838,0.0005246046,0.0002567913,0.00055250403,0.00026926235,0.0010535559,0.000551295,0.000033263415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000941821,0.00039677764,0.00008760682,0.00015901873,0.00048319827,0.00015089408,0.0009256204,0.0018650118,0.0000063383504],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012823848,0.00007835973,0.9357666,0.00023053765,0.00017052959,0.00030068838,0.015612707,0.0024100447,0.0000064738133,0.0010260848,0.0003775908,0.043892175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093847595,0.00015157663,0.97419935,0.0019956613,0.000037506034,0.0000027017218,0.011880099,0.0010566826,0.000022294143,0.002411439,0.0063018245,0.0010023675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4890581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8840087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39495063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036504122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047454787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123201476","doi":"","title":"Stigma and the Take-up of Social Programs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Stigma (botany); Psychology; Social stigma; Social psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Family medicine","score_opus":0.0544561275720777,"score_gpt":0.3455783051439421,"score_spread":0.2911221775718644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123201476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8144407,0.00045764,0.0000037307918,0.0009391872,0.0008868813,0.0012723267,0.00004460447,0.000029702893,0.18192518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845184,0.011569702,0.00017462448,0.00004191589,0.0005860102,0.00016042574,0.0000260589,0.000031030922,0.0028918185],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685556,0.0009037196,0.00048611723,0.00046584525,0.0004308172,0.0008579334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840343,0.000555276,0.00023492784,0.00044703792,0.00018881801,0.00017052778],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060671875,0.00020273175,0.0005050722,0.000159806,0.0006127091,0.00018078684,0.00081131415,0.00054666837,0.00004149205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046460962,0.00017385595,0.00016692196,0.00016143385,0.003311533,0.00008921853,0.000831647,0.0012435295,0.000003368203],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000272916,0.00029224154,0.10393564,0.0003492461,0.00025551027,0.0000042234233,0.16680439,0.00013949782,0.000014400763,0.1767147,0.000127813,0.5510894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007321229,0.00016037835,0.3182129,0.00035871315,0.0001517987,0.0000052420123,0.37855428,0.004396308,0.000013820004,0.07853125,0.21032432,0.0019697486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017472529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044506756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54911965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003910811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092076027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123208366","doi":"","title":"Do Only Tax Incentives Matter? Labor Supply and Demand Responses to an Unusually Large and Salient Tax Break","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung; Washington Center for Equitable Growth","keywords":"Payroll tax; Economics; Incentive; Labour economics; Earnings; Tax rate; Income tax; Demographic economics; Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Public economics","score_opus":0.0143911932579677,"score_gpt":0.2663457661925921,"score_spread":0.2519545729346244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123208366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97522324,0.00034943235,0.000078471174,0.0033643255,0.0001882431,0.00046539848,0.010750772,0.00014259496,0.009437536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913855,0.00021017162,0.000733696,0.0020329333,0.00019897835,0.00001732375,0.00015273299,0.000064788444,0.005203858],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729526,0.00031231533,0.00036189443,0.00073416973,0.00050710025,0.0007892665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998013,0.00018294808,0.00019665837,0.00061797944,0.00008770539,0.00090167177],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006664757,0.00034550446,0.00034470198,0.00018501698,0.0016796682,0.007126161,0.0008128289,0.00022478664,0.00015564609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057746575,0.00032900236,0.000069895155,0.00022942564,0.0005165033,0.0061606546,0.00065505016,0.00028661836,0.0002883517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018478419,0.00015411718,0.9832661,0.000027599566,0.000026122492,0.00003283582,0.0020221875,2.9165304e-7,0.00007894651,0.0100986995,0.0016053389,0.0025029357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058524025,0.000111121364,0.8521569,0.00007358144,0.00001791171,0.0000053126773,0.002774957,0.0000083814675,0.00004318132,0.0075196773,0.13625582,0.00044795815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001327957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046748845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13465048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003936231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029445186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123211115","doi":"","title":"Impacts of Eligibility Expansions and Provider Reimbursement Rate Increases on Child Care Subsidy Take-Up Rates, Welfare Use and Work","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Welfare; Welfare reform; Quarter (Canadian coin); Reimbursement; Cash; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Aid to Families with Dependent Children; Child care; Business; Single mothers; Labour economics; Economics; Medicine; Economic growth; Health care; Finance; Nursing; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.039758384380563845,"score_gpt":0.34333211789128393,"score_spread":0.3035737335107201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123211115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98711133,0.0012155597,4.0731464e-7,0.00045001885,0.00031856442,0.0015704955,0.0002654743,0.000028429518,0.009039735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9546318,0.044507235,0.00015075882,0.00010335838,0.0000788681,0.00010344102,0.00008864162,0.000040744635,0.00029515967],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957301,0.0012315746,0.0006553504,0.0011251881,0.0003918538,0.00086594664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717474,0.0007736925,0.00026091406,0.00093811477,0.00037761094,0.0004749052],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027319908,0.00037362825,0.0006467603,0.0003370249,0.0007252489,0.00033863727,0.0003977276,0.00053542625,0.000035678033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002397968,0.00037931858,0.000115439725,0.00025343098,0.0009990267,0.00019342266,0.0005477715,0.0011938191,8.6013847e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003127857,0.00031159385,0.9648323,0.00048175518,0.00014299972,0.000022016215,0.016904322,0.00094821624,0.000025590083,0.0027429229,0.000096989206,0.013178497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001035649,0.00018518999,0.9284615,0.0006800239,0.000036466878,0.0000018252942,0.06162944,0.000077126075,0.000041720617,0.0010052033,0.0062039355,0.0006419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009270465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018726187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044725116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008667029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010922042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123228801","doi":"","title":"Une analyse des taux marginaux effectifs d'imposition au Québec","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Redistribution (election); Humanities; Welfare economics; Repartition; Economics; Art","score_opus":0.026978311473092646,"score_gpt":0.31969116361291394,"score_spread":0.2927128521398213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123228801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79705554,0.00051196554,0.00006881358,0.0013417354,0.0010947698,0.000953899,0.00010633086,0.00006534839,0.1988016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654505,0.013952367,0.0015912461,0.00009609767,0.0011020259,0.00025394227,0.00021798343,0.00011514728,0.017220685],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923505,0.0019393963,0.0011365161,0.0016373992,0.00068886834,0.0022472725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960588,0.0013378442,0.00039785894,0.0012097242,0.000410039,0.000585722],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004887511,0.00067755365,0.0010235329,0.00071264384,0.0016989434,0.00038540998,0.0013232753,0.0012155784,0.00013573914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005048253,0.00080251903,0.00054729305,0.0011471498,0.003553451,0.00036275003,0.00077796855,0.0023340518,0.00012516144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012617657,0.0006834645,0.6418812,0.00043466542,0.0003225139,0.00010345432,0.017080992,0.05643994,0.00021075056,0.006973877,0.00014700388,0.27559593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011045261,0.0002956617,0.90949553,0.00043439702,0.00011229318,0.0000143572115,0.021442827,0.023106614,0.00004030058,0.010319921,0.032316055,0.0013175333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6763179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86761916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27427837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017674578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007397109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123257937","doi":"","title":"Should day care be subsidized","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Welfare; Labour economics; Tax deduction; Work (physics); Deadweight loss; Overlapping generations model; Deductible; Tax reform; Public economics; Gross income; State income tax; Market economy; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.06515241080220256,"score_gpt":0.36723196514144857,"score_spread":0.302079554339246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123257937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6240336,0.00024908816,0.0000028399254,0.0009595295,0.0020793276,0.00093406654,0.00016780873,0.000093979994,0.3714798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671302,0.023808366,0.0008808462,0.0002732981,0.0010652408,0.00023938833,0.00021071047,0.00010154689,0.006290443],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507535,0.0008888131,0.0006359306,0.0012059755,0.0007255182,0.0014684432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676317,0.00077651395,0.00019570132,0.0013666169,0.00041988998,0.0004780956],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043317224,0.00038784835,0.00066206563,0.00050838664,0.00075849966,0.00042981358,0.0018225418,0.0017216436,0.0002639411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012721673,0.00044417108,0.0002915298,0.00025195087,0.0011652452,0.00013881263,0.0012238466,0.004344518,0.000023659426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022189578,0.00070830004,0.259334,0.00081775937,0.00048393843,0.00026135356,0.3444521,0.009082003,0.00088014663,0.045176197,0.0013591233,0.3372232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018517898,0.00011869068,0.05620934,0.00024779426,0.0000491482,0.000003090211,0.21636023,0.0027410223,0.000096557094,0.011710795,0.7083979,0.0022136269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034175543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06527038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70703876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015990057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033033981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123258972","doi":"","title":"Hourly Versus Salaried Payment and Decisions About Trading Off Time and Money Over Time","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); British Household Panel Survey; Payment; Economics; Leisure time; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Panel data; Compensation (psychology); Working time; Econometrics; Work (physics); Psychology; Finance; Social psychology","score_opus":0.010481277019382815,"score_gpt":0.26397384731876905,"score_spread":0.2534925702993862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123258972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934262,0.001875956,0.00019550718,0.00058708986,0.00042419505,0.00012107525,0.000011355613,0.0000334606,0.0033251492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882404,0.008375391,0.00022267799,0.00007969984,0.00037599955,0.0000018066559,0.000004348049,0.000020708632,0.0026789454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756145,0.00010319464,0.00021766561,0.00022455759,0.0003980022,0.0014951057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992002,0.00022296766,0.00010921748,0.00012519835,0.00006701162,0.00027537966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018150005,0.00015256675,0.00019040678,0.00009740757,0.0009243998,0.00022889685,0.00019872138,0.00016669123,0.00011202079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021172447,0.00013798218,0.00006420615,0.00016897844,0.00020273944,0.0002618422,0.00003828802,0.0013918367,0.000024217396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006255301,0.0003975223,0.054021485,0.000006688008,0.0009343834,0.00003551283,0.029078197,0.000023303744,0.027906276,0.67418534,0.0029199042,0.2098659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015487697,0.0022803533,0.37310988,0.000119990735,0.0007520786,0.00048868364,0.03367707,0.013183335,0.00006355916,0.49879807,0.059483446,0.0025558565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038272745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059613716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3190884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028379908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013496368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.710983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123269311","doi":"","title":"Do Child Tax Benefits Affect the Wellbeing of Children? Evidence from Canadian Child Benefit Expansions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Dalhousie University; McGill University","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Public economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.047682166198204395,"score_gpt":0.33618141927785167,"score_spread":0.2884992530796473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123269311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9765009,0.0013404448,0.000005125843,0.011549496,0.00029039072,0.0007214386,0.0011276139,0.000012181619,0.008452374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828699,0.0152554875,0.0006402524,0.0005859204,0.0005206198,0.00001236279,0.0000140476095,0.000025190917,0.00007617527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99242437,0.00027033928,0.0013185587,0.001335606,0.0007982571,0.003852879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98928267,0.0019084725,0.00033531844,0.0010002373,0.0009489896,0.006524326],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0082415715,0.00040818815,0.000903135,0.0010923161,0.0032507456,0.00050731516,0.0025560716,0.00030838873,0.0001693287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059094364,0.00034365864,0.000230298,0.0014924476,0.01732298,0.0015806966,0.0008438151,0.0010403625,0.000020448933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000286262,0.000107740925,0.2153179,0.000013322903,0.000024254769,0.0000015355446,0.0004339423,0.0002685978,0.00009889889,0.7832933,0.000026202439,0.00038566868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007131142,0.00037723823,0.9442255,0.00025022647,0.00004077862,0.000031856423,0.003939451,0.0037236847,0.00074426143,0.044760056,0.0006648399,0.00052901095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38763487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11741175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73853326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010393758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008174244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123333965","doi":"","title":"Evidence of Added Worker Effect from the 2008 Economic Crisis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"Economics; Unemployment; Instrumental variable; Quarter (Canadian coin); Interdependence; Labour economics; Identification (biology); Turkish; Discouraged worker; Demographic economics; Unemployment rate; Econometrics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.06751457204461025,"score_gpt":0.3640851768920382,"score_spread":0.2965706048474279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123333965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9440198,0.0025910374,0.0000035374655,0.0013210991,0.0016044714,0.0012055824,0.00017569929,0.000040783743,0.04903802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95087105,0.046775065,0.0002473444,0.00010182528,0.0007927198,0.00017507006,0.000040279483,0.000053330226,0.0009433205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994716,0.0020612767,0.00078028167,0.0009845876,0.000513869,0.0009439899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931923,0.004359782,0.00036267636,0.0015328979,0.00023933995,0.00031301583],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009014727,0.00034214984,0.0007751813,0.00023313811,0.00035656872,0.00025162377,0.0022217997,0.00072357035,0.00023347617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020108877,0.00030170465,0.0002976273,0.0001808933,0.0010589338,0.00019406788,0.001293813,0.0016869531,0.000058651818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007784758,0.00027486353,0.71393955,0.00023132222,0.0008558693,0.000040769824,0.054581285,0.038454752,0.00006605926,0.002216273,0.022617811,0.16594295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055262814,0.0011876812,0.45363247,0.0057782885,0.0004391561,0.000005845536,0.23747936,0.037160173,0.0002188015,0.08147218,0.17185159,0.005248178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015723605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0298384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2603071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020331095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033239939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123346627","doi":"","title":"The Determinants of University Participation in Canada (1977?2003)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Market liquidity; Demographic economics; Regret; Economics; Balance (ability); Propensity score matching; Secular variation; Demography; Psychology; Sociology; Monetary economics; Medicine; Population","score_opus":0.04312186501064033,"score_gpt":0.32230195669165707,"score_spread":0.27918009168101676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123346627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9603233,0.000050488718,4.831796e-7,0.00015117381,0.0004762168,0.00039698943,0.000044795655,0.000005298093,0.038551297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620978,0.03627883,0.00005137311,0.000014873417,0.00004500771,0.00001108286,0.0000074929626,0.0000110183855,0.0014824824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974982,0.0007808097,0.00038538274,0.00035546251,0.0003307707,0.0006493656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842095,0.00060939795,0.0001739662,0.00044122574,0.00022480117,0.00012965902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002034133,0.00012126809,0.0002781834,0.00015826845,0.000392912,0.000030088018,0.00073531084,0.0002145924,0.0000080546915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008778594,0.00012638577,0.000044863566,0.0003189855,0.0005190826,0.000063536616,0.0003585722,0.0006828367,9.567419e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005403976,0.00005243369,0.9367854,0.000031595933,0.000016582426,0.00004850173,0.0057490324,0.0066368906,0.0000016430049,0.0005424037,0.00009102778,0.04999047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039575633,0.000024652729,0.9012688,0.00008643221,0.000005355536,5.8839737e-7,0.04405927,0.020232739,0.000009895491,0.0005291073,0.033093713,0.0002936983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8596782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13757077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038187562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012522859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123353613","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.683984","title":"The Effects of Welfare-to-Work Program Activities on Labor Market Outcomes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Quarter (Canadian coin); Human capital; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Odds; Labour economics; Economics; Business; Logistic regression; Medicine; Economic growth; Accounting; Engineering","score_opus":0.004896482719773389,"score_gpt":0.2681001670280376,"score_spread":0.2632036843082642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123353613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.977491,0.0013502012,0.00010933564,0.011484174,0.00072017,0.0004897399,0.0000026974749,0.00006515174,0.008287506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855885,0.00444104,0.00013597053,0.000262608,0.00038135346,0.000024900106,4.2439945e-7,0.000018699826,0.009146498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967942,0.00031526972,0.00023025321,0.00014961738,0.00056057103,0.0019500396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899626,0.00045230374,0.00015135696,0.00018262719,0.00009260407,0.00012484372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020043605,0.00015294303,0.00020199156,0.000080909966,0.001087812,0.000120948,0.00048904796,0.000092176735,0.000015222481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037881054,0.00010254873,0.00014023129,0.00043521108,0.00015794576,0.00013004948,0.000029618715,0.0009266887,0.000009927102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017704487,0.00040462572,0.09130447,0.000016146087,0.00034543767,0.0000026673224,0.007295935,0.000044932003,0.000032889162,0.51326567,0.0011297966,0.3859804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018875921,0.002727542,0.5157562,0.000120338016,0.00015499168,0.00001562245,0.08984757,0.00004286524,0.00009721332,0.060828682,0.3277356,0.00078577653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001102501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006459479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45243698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007122646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011261994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8366681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123359116","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Marriage and Divorce","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Marriage market; Demographic economics; Conditional cash transfer; Cash; Marital status; Cash transfers; Labour economics; Economic growth; Demography; Finance","score_opus":0.034524638536880335,"score_gpt":0.35839449342560964,"score_spread":0.3238698548887293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123359116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8547403,0.0001097521,0.0000036484562,0.0004256859,0.00017585183,0.0005585093,0.0002731051,0.000014124971,0.14369898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97059894,0.028143857,0.000042717813,0.00003777024,0.00016088538,0.000034809604,0.00004474917,0.000019423125,0.0009168279],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751407,0.0005809897,0.00039701257,0.0004771763,0.00037802724,0.0006527089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797016,0.0011455285,0.00010567651,0.0004475438,0.00012480357,0.00020626088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028971718,0.00020447244,0.00034145574,0.00020420802,0.00056326314,0.00017071809,0.00060407136,0.0003806128,0.000042424574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036955226,0.00017146433,0.00020499733,0.00011342713,0.0012167363,0.00006319391,0.00015503101,0.0010723519,0.000002125947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009918034,0.00092387944,0.16774853,0.00027841504,0.0009964473,0.00009792655,0.047140498,0.085358694,0.00026257904,0.19577852,0.00112607,0.49929664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014775848,0.0007959899,0.83355457,0.00023844544,0.000024288032,0.000004854415,0.025807204,0.0063382084,0.00001629249,0.12446842,0.006415111,0.00085904513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002100403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044995747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66580606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008495852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012755835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69921124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123387846","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1855150","title":"Estimating Labor Supply Responses and Welfare Participation: Using a Natural Experiment to Validate a Structural Labor Supply Model","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Economics; Labour economics; Natural experiment; Natural (archaeology); Market economy; Medicine","score_opus":0.03411354028384295,"score_gpt":0.3295323047041423,"score_spread":0.29541876442029935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123387846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944733,0.0013635394,0.0020730225,0.0012230531,0.00042917195,0.00024723477,0.000029235924,0.000051667706,0.00010980702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98196864,0.00020054023,0.0168981,0.00023211694,0.0002648794,0.000013146781,0.0000040741306,0.00002803596,0.0003904809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652445,0.00028678193,0.00035984936,0.000300828,0.0004589956,0.0020690842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990982,0.000040770363,0.00016596075,0.00015932009,0.00026574702,0.00027003203],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012615962,0.00022112955,0.0002322292,0.00014157327,0.0013707633,0.00020108519,0.00030253292,0.00009820692,0.000049074246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019946985,0.00020198557,0.00006636747,0.00034531258,0.00012721916,0.0004784638,0.00007278287,0.00073879695,0.000003143063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079400616,0.0001241847,0.28752947,0.000024828361,0.0002999897,0.000031899523,0.24369864,0.0061525693,0.005431997,0.44996098,0.00004073095,0.0059106993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031055175,0.001036015,0.2369849,0.0001590873,0.0003368571,0.00034644676,0.28247252,0.27042344,0.00077087374,0.20209345,0.00036838005,0.0019025294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013058252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031464784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26427087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007755024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019793177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123450516","doi":"","title":"How do the U.S and Canadian Social Safety Nets Compare for Women and Children","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Welfare; Demographic economics; Cash transfers; Social assistance; Welfare reform; Economics; Single mothers; Social policy; Public assistance; Political science; Economic growth; Psychology","score_opus":0.03710050180260161,"score_gpt":0.3209348140239153,"score_spread":0.2838343122213137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123450516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9090492,0.00034224943,0.0000014203815,0.007769197,0.00037958898,0.0015586044,0.0007224036,0.0000161874,0.08016111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830825,0.012676463,0.00007112111,0.00012699273,0.00052074227,0.0001744012,0.000058729744,0.000030015297,0.0032590579],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762005,0.00029139014,0.00021920938,0.0006144393,0.00019949499,0.0010554083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985102,0.00033953314,0.00013897585,0.0004783786,0.00012606145,0.00040684672],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028694926,0.00020771232,0.00038874903,0.00017745794,0.002770071,0.0012334152,0.0008592051,0.00038368034,0.000009489804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034101037,0.00019589205,0.000070430426,0.000045284316,0.0013503769,0.000108968976,0.00052132143,0.00085477915,5.0423057e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009673728,0.000042583804,0.59968185,0.00012596484,0.0003176015,0.0000070263313,0.092374586,0.00014145215,0.000001642191,0.020612605,0.00071305124,0.28588486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007363299,0.000036643265,0.7420314,0.00004172802,0.0000113227825,0.0000021971925,0.054123946,0.0008219432,1.6751504e-7,0.018912833,0.18279688,0.00048461513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03867534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5659784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5273031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012877614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018497948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123467327","doi":"10.1111/coep.2015.33.issue-2","title":"Privatization in China: Technology and Gender in the Manufacturing Sector","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Productivity; Wage; Production (economics); Labour economics; China; Panel data; Business; Manufacturing sector; Low wage; Demographic economics; Economics; Economic growth; Econometrics","score_opus":0.035903292255357544,"score_gpt":0.3143734612893097,"score_spread":0.27847016903395216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123467327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9497005,0.00012802829,0.000006561753,0.001001363,0.00020010574,0.0009936745,0.000008114944,0.000025527608,0.04793617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98771083,0.011236143,0.00030272812,0.00006360786,0.000118893695,0.00021507259,0.000015588921,0.000024321567,0.0003128264],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752104,0.00051862537,0.00041388773,0.00060287106,0.00024645895,0.00069708517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899083,0.0002847546,0.0001085411,0.00050935626,0.000042065334,0.00006445511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026901162,0.00018759041,0.00029854826,0.001049212,0.00020920031,0.00019153125,0.00079759,0.00066080136,0.000032393793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040880052,0.00017479942,0.00003802908,0.00034311498,0.00048635516,0.00012316804,0.00059459463,0.0016903431,0.0000035518717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021225811,0.00019936194,0.78890115,0.00024940315,0.00003922904,0.000035438814,0.08611121,0.009639823,0.000049009992,0.037742347,0.0000305212,0.076981306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045892762,0.000024247896,0.8543926,0.00008147201,0.0000030039657,0.0000022683364,0.030271193,0.004971913,0.000014303906,0.10574563,0.0036757318,0.0003587322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018353536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011677304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076622576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081025646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004269104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73437935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123504590","doi":"","title":"Volunteer Activity and the Demands of Work and Family","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Volunteer; Variety (cybernetics); Econometric analysis; Function (biology); Volunteer work; Business; Public relations; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics; Political science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.023973452397554364,"score_gpt":0.2897938812718444,"score_spread":0.26582042887429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123504590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822454,0.00057416,0.000034533718,0.003830972,0.00026149204,0.0003990812,0.0001571723,0.000010291495,0.012486904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935407,0.004333982,0.001029345,0.00081806426,0.00013052655,0.00000648211,0.0000014503063,0.000015928963,0.00012350682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586767,0.00021053349,0.00097133964,0.00085958146,0.00028730446,0.0018035906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99490535,0.001399002,0.0003904533,0.00049628725,0.00035169825,0.0024572168],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005930895,0.00035155143,0.0009384058,0.00035552224,0.00077859865,0.0004138749,0.00078517315,0.00021513441,0.000041506868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031630488,0.00027279308,0.00013654008,0.000592946,0.020205835,0.0010612708,0.00042739068,0.00037706931,0.0000026825478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084809166,0.00008828738,0.09323601,0.000023042274,0.000019120265,3.321303e-7,0.00030291764,0.00002080044,0.00016356002,0.9055661,0.000005618406,0.000489391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027284706,0.0004004223,0.63648427,0.00007707941,0.0001318451,0.000018223154,0.0085643735,0.0042124507,0.00084328995,0.3432861,0.0025274646,0.0007259969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006268058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009866274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024033606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021919084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123507580","doi":"","title":"An Analysis of Effective Marginal Tax Rates in Quebec","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Microsimulation; Economics; Redistribution (election); Population; Demographic economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Distribution (mathematics); Income tax; Labour economics; Public economics; Geography","score_opus":0.017552807349296727,"score_gpt":0.2772355120530642,"score_spread":0.2596827047037675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123507580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78244346,0.0000050003646,0.0025785272,0.00003418118,0.0003092974,0.0010126575,0.00022292194,0.00009694427,0.21329704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96704185,0.0316545,0.00080102717,0.00003678274,0.000106409614,0.0000050166814,0.00019460818,0.000024962736,0.00013481652],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967684,0.0009408218,0.00032776393,0.0008130141,0.0005443782,0.00060559175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814075,0.00028173666,0.0003973788,0.00060668366,0.0004100326,0.00016339155],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010730352,0.0003696617,0.00082507473,0.030749818,0.00022506255,0.000093798015,0.0010372438,0.00066735194,0.000042061518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105577106,0.00044018388,0.0004195095,0.02078047,0.00043381547,0.0003701906,0.00036134518,0.00068362127,0.0000036698161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004899388,0.0013156069,0.6977797,0.00028322532,0.0025362715,0.0004846115,0.24862705,0.010270102,0.000014635369,0.018077303,0.000035568974,0.020085962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015962746,0.00024224882,0.49883294,0.00020897189,0.0033901331,4.600866e-7,0.09844797,0.008764781,0.00006183799,0.000029687599,0.3869003,0.0015244056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9626943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97622263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38686472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014938464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020420817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123523100","doi":"","title":"The Instability of Family Earnings and Family Income in Canada, 1986 to 1991 and 1996 to 2001","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Unemployment; Demographic economics; Economics; Transfer payment; Distribution (mathematics); Family income; Labour economics; Economic growth; Finance","score_opus":0.03105094483727124,"score_gpt":0.31417173319800246,"score_spread":0.28312078836073123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123523100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9647154,0.00033503922,9.276211e-7,0.0011563618,0.00024913778,0.0010924697,0.00012838967,0.000010427532,0.032311838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814002,0.017000254,0.00042592912,0.00030296383,0.00009161375,0.00010764075,0.000009153774,0.000027837119,0.0006343883],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620235,0.0006198088,0.0007358982,0.0008508354,0.0005049777,0.0010861352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973848,0.0011043263,0.00014602482,0.0006747314,0.00016505537,0.00052509154],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005272126,0.000261526,0.00056061853,0.00035435037,0.0004011865,0.00014008996,0.00084955734,0.00030013456,0.00000564546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012470374,0.000256732,0.000052458843,0.00037727779,0.0006248729,0.00008622815,0.0013686585,0.0012271379,0.000001343713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008562839,0.000044919,0.89749616,0.0000756829,0.000028306576,0.0000079515885,0.010861768,0.004511136,0.00008823692,0.00059591205,0.000081205275,0.086123094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023616622,0.00004433568,0.9320908,0.00008378467,0.000002892769,3.3965225e-7,0.031968836,0.0007747414,0.0000015685,0.00047949576,0.034049496,0.00026750183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9103234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99241316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08585559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030487452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004581835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123551066","doi":"","title":"What do “residuals” from first-order conditions reveal about DGE models?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Brock University; University of Toronto; York University; McMaster University; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); Econometrics; Economics; Aggregate (composite); Order (exchange); Consumption (sociology); Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04092719222379416,"score_gpt":0.33578996555109697,"score_spread":0.2948627733273028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123551066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7121015,0.0020991706,0.000052074305,0.0017376103,0.0028672973,0.0015212155,0.0012710027,0.00014696704,0.27820313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80236834,0.17239776,0.0024134954,0.00039202167,0.0018757323,0.0006039293,0.0015597253,0.00016892354,0.018220035],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99455184,0.00077538606,0.0009241714,0.0014699127,0.0007713737,0.0015073073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629205,0.0011738071,0.00029549448,0.0013558365,0.00046477595,0.00041803325],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024917615,0.0004689266,0.0007525231,0.00053896394,0.0011437641,0.0014156253,0.0015438674,0.0012463517,0.00031411767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004238271,0.00056560535,0.00027965405,0.0003492006,0.0012136918,0.00074648036,0.0010694546,0.0022358662,0.000051981522],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020792574,0.0017809503,0.1496318,0.00052412186,0.00094778696,0.00026939102,0.08817185,0.57944155,0.000048241414,0.07011428,0.01678938,0.092072725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026939886,0.00012923866,0.14442526,0.0018925654,0.00011627754,0.0000037983425,0.115152396,0.067364335,0.000008969406,0.48532632,0.17937386,0.0035129888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016552644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06529792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5120772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018921401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022327919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123554108","doi":"10.25336/p60602","title":"Wage differentials of males and females in same-sex and different-sex couples in Canada, 2006–2010","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Earnings; Wage; Differential (mechanical device); Psychology; Demographic economics; Demography; Economics; Labour economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.044399077535751605,"score_gpt":0.2886738264042203,"score_spread":0.24427474886846867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123554108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99733084,0.0015710529,0.0000036836952,0.00024202217,0.0002698334,0.00018488147,0.000047261023,0.0000035390874,0.000346868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984058,0.0012179344,0.000026797794,0.000074189615,0.00003927507,0.000009666468,0.000017829012,0.0000071798236,0.00020133187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988936,0.00014986991,0.00029366414,0.00019600427,0.00015093252,0.00031590054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952644,0.00016403175,0.000072666204,0.00009049835,0.000029299665,0.00011708547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029929297,0.000115929484,0.00032357546,0.0002315865,0.0001240688,0.000015753707,0.00007626092,0.00007603872,0.000005167517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022547503,0.00011653914,0.000011400418,0.0001721129,0.00018527595,0.0000641973,0.000026870815,0.00008554368,1.1503354e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019035555,0.0000056377244,0.98821056,0.00003159522,0.000007086803,0.000002826163,0.0068203425,0.000036838388,0.000008387725,0.002578427,0.000042539028,0.0022538798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023032419,0.000007794515,0.9713707,0.000050994342,0.0000056561107,1.8368858e-7,0.025884723,0.0005724278,0.0000013234801,0.0016751793,0.000085731874,0.000114965886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019064382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000619778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020534097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4752328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123556337","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.10.002","title":"Assortative marriage and the effects of government homecare subsidy programs on gender wage and participation inequality","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Economics; Labour economics; Inequality; Government (linguistics); Wage inequality; Wage; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.02977717320365006,"score_gpt":0.27468594624794346,"score_spread":0.2449087730442934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123556337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99646854,0.00022439969,0.00017220434,0.0005537152,0.00024832477,0.00021206682,0.000016501808,0.0000033520896,0.002100918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991159,0.00044536157,0.00012376967,0.000091943584,0.00013842317,0.0000056115396,0.000002654977,0.0000058903815,0.00007047607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988245,0.00033269316,0.00038279814,0.0000953339,0.00019288668,0.00017179453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872,0.0004380289,0.00057254103,0.0000817269,0.00010141408,0.000086286374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020313703,0.00008156465,0.0002283841,0.000031765656,0.00013610434,0.0001256423,0.00010749376,0.000065756576,0.0000036372444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003158059,0.00005858233,0.000059331735,0.00006795106,0.00024550184,0.00025279305,0.00002345842,0.0001184063,2.5902355e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000607423,0.0001883008,0.7311629,0.000047531168,0.00011367046,0.0000025760953,0.016446143,0.000048159967,0.0000226632,0.24409865,0.00010609013,0.007702548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018311995,0.00020509795,0.96587974,0.000015116882,0.000058941412,0.0000012547137,0.014942826,0.00034890132,0.000033772067,0.015762642,0.00081638515,0.0001041382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032223773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021938179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23471679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015819246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008167987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2388918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123617270","doi":"","title":"How is Economic Hardship Avoided by Those Retiring Before the Social Security Entitlement Age","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Pension; Earnings; Social security; Poverty; Health and Retirement Study; Economics; Retirement age; Labour economics; Consumption (sociology); Demographic economics; Annuity; Economic growth; Finance; Medicine; Sociology; Life annuity; Gerontology","score_opus":0.017002542979751116,"score_gpt":0.28580479358259486,"score_spread":0.26880225060284374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123617270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97809696,0.0030906955,0.00038232852,0.011144053,0.0010420165,0.00022503838,0.000028653682,0.000038475388,0.0059518046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98920035,0.0024728228,0.000013605588,0.0003428566,0.0021540613,0.0000065570885,0.0000070812594,0.000020545602,0.0057821134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964347,0.00028210098,0.00020333994,0.00016069136,0.00037217804,0.0025469994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994634,0.000028357641,0.00018717622,0.00013465973,0.00004540275,0.00014104985],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003388494,0.00015555754,0.00016453283,0.000041026462,0.0017533763,0.00033281438,0.00049273245,0.0001300421,0.000108852684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038942504,0.00012367497,0.00017856441,0.0001005204,0.00017767158,0.0004094263,0.000056760655,0.0013205141,0.0000403081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020131756,0.00013208692,0.06331389,0.000009789734,0.00034921704,0.0000021359315,0.19483887,0.000001352499,0.00014163285,0.7128066,0.019478628,0.008905715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087070616,0.0001318515,0.008495118,0.000013951243,0.00014277616,0.000026036805,0.35971457,0.00004575672,0.000070844304,0.41599703,0.21400636,0.0004850028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060305296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013784169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29680955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019999922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010964011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123621738","doi":"10.25071/1916-0925.40187","title":"Time Preference and Religious Affiliation in Canada: A Quantitative Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Jewish Studies / Études juives canadiennes","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proxy (statistics); Demographic economics; Investment (military); Economics; Population; Preference; Time preference; Permanent income hypothesis; Welfare economics; Sociology; Demography; Political science; Microeconomics; Monetary economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.038311149276579845,"score_gpt":0.25680379852920354,"score_spread":0.21849264925262368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123621738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98538035,0.0058395956,0.000004255931,0.004306948,0.00016109372,0.00032515853,0.00028791942,0.000030263609,0.003664421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956774,0.0022483617,0.00016563832,0.0016274113,0.00006114928,0.000028746135,0.000031695672,0.00001564289,0.00014396297],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780625,0.00018603087,0.00034193875,0.0005380313,0.00026954638,0.0008582286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980984,0.0002939211,0.00011795229,0.00015572966,0.00026717337,0.0010668357],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025632532,0.00024597783,0.00058000704,0.000353189,0.00049666554,0.000059756683,0.00030084615,0.00008336689,0.000022348017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009053821,0.00027072962,0.00006723546,0.0018315219,0.00039123016,0.00019076355,0.000049341965,0.00016644667,0.0000054004213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016892034,0.000012513053,0.62402505,0.000079076686,0.0015437753,0.00024479078,0.332099,0.0017762574,0.000016854607,0.033083722,0.0052712546,0.0018308093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032518175,0.00009480956,0.4824436,0.00004164664,0.00034052652,8.9340574e-7,0.5032491,0.0042857933,0.0000010326421,0.00056544197,0.008000019,0.0006519414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99837625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17115015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026913804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056294138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123690318","doi":"","title":"Consumer Demand System Estimation and Value Added Tax Reforms in the Czech Republic","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ASEP","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Almost ideal demand system; Economics; Czech; Revenue; Estimation; Value-added tax; Value (mathematics); Econometrics; Tax revenue; Quarter (Canadian coin); Consumption (sociology); Ad valorem tax; Government revenue; Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Public economics; Tax reform; Demand management; Statistics","score_opus":0.015938224289419215,"score_gpt":0.2705439014187026,"score_spread":0.2546056771292834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123690318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9614558,0.00012436547,0.002182299,0.00069647335,0.00019576748,0.00024123814,0.0000053337267,0.000047559588,0.035051126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988976,0.000034296805,0.0004466751,0.00027456725,0.000056840236,0.000015202309,0.0000076264264,0.0000045121005,0.0002626913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999084,0.00025630902,0.00013731726,0.00013488194,0.00021109058,0.00017639875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995448,0.00014102018,0.000058295143,0.00016892729,0.000040823892,0.00004611908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016203184,0.000061013492,0.000092129994,0.00004215823,0.00026653957,0.00009710046,0.00014017061,0.00007861479,0.0000047292656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024600376,0.000040197232,0.000017499362,0.00020474788,0.000105842984,0.00014662363,0.000016591268,0.00007895317,0.000014227785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010950527,0.000058358193,0.09075108,0.00009860076,0.00002274867,0.000006648844,0.052790727,0.00019378045,0.000041546882,0.8326366,0.0024563703,0.020932585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00163539,0.00012574927,0.68287706,0.0001471519,0.00007736887,0.000019464129,0.11444688,0.13525282,0.000019977835,0.02377794,0.041060835,0.0005593413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024188068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022044948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80885863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050740706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049450333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36565283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123724789","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Student Debt on Education, Career, and Marriage Choices of Female Lawyers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Subsidy; Student debt; Wage; Promotion (chess); Labour economics; Quality (philosophy); Economics; Business; Political science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.017482863140015938,"score_gpt":0.34381748707406856,"score_spread":0.3263346239340526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123724789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98668873,0.002763215,0.000021076432,0.00029043845,0.00028531786,0.00010459893,0.0000031281143,0.000003290327,0.009840209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841403,0.014358382,0.000008326221,0.00001136746,0.00018882664,0.0000018942993,4.5860202e-7,0.0000063774874,0.0012840778],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859095,0.00010925899,0.00017803947,0.00009172786,0.00030772056,0.0007223354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990915,0.00008102901,0.00035620356,0.00021550641,0.0001802735,0.00007549499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017070291,0.000078960096,0.00012697926,0.000038709193,0.0012044285,0.00012822021,0.0005379927,0.000049181668,0.000005672861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014381584,0.000051850035,0.00008941632,0.000051588177,0.00028360917,0.00013447498,0.000029655066,0.000380435,8.462794e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026967486,0.00011275454,0.777202,0.0000040838145,0.00017551093,2.2891803e-7,0.00776242,0.000025450652,0.000105376515,0.20276675,0.00007111285,0.011747359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032193074,0.0003281251,0.8718474,0.000020663321,0.000029011799,0.0000048265965,0.06736871,0.000008085076,0.000011301849,0.059629202,0.00034775326,0.00008297522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004991696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020411158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14313754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038669194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038553337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99746376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123763901","doi":"","title":"Intra-Household Behavioral Responses to Cash Transfer Programs: Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Regression discontinuity design; Formality; Conditional cash transfer; Cash; Demographic economics; Cash transfers; Economics; Random assignment; Welfare; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Poverty; Medicine; Finance; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.13435283307791895,"score_gpt":0.37746914266711684,"score_spread":0.2431163095891979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123763901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952719,0.00008996169,0.0004090036,0.0012857746,0.00026923118,0.0010826249,0.00005542536,0.000091282214,0.0014447678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902378,0.0047806054,0.0019388925,0.000071256116,0.00020017239,0.00019848517,0.0000032165146,0.000042123414,0.0025274488],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579555,0.0013845854,0.00045399374,0.0007813934,0.0005028298,0.0010816474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713445,0.0015919303,0.000047756766,0.00062603253,0.00013248234,0.0004673741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003734222,0.00021960093,0.0003321892,0.0002546189,0.0004589247,0.00022735792,0.00081345934,0.00026897568,0.00008619171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001094765,0.00016999556,0.000109369845,0.00034092955,0.00067414506,0.0005020508,0.00015013464,0.0003797149,0.000021246276],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080362544,0.00031357276,0.3167679,0.000009417811,0.000022427083,0.00007016108,0.024498247,0.00004519866,0.008692992,0.00031314793,0.000113174356,0.6483501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040539973,0.0023644185,0.84106374,0.0036037844,0.00007196124,0.000008959443,0.101946324,0.00046193055,0.0031241097,0.0050794696,0.03552247,0.0026988178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003083411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02332978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64565134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010041152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008523619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99449193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123764536","doi":"","title":"The differential impact of universal child benefits on the labor supply of married and single mothers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Single mothers; Economics; Margin (machine learning); Child care; Demographic economics; Percentage point; Labour economics; Medicine; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.03406221452663127,"score_gpt":0.3084240158189167,"score_spread":0.27436180129228543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123764536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9516098,0.00016316555,2.990517e-7,0.0006289087,0.00024136825,0.00057437253,0.00035232495,0.00000911575,0.046420675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988769,0.010540061,0.000017448843,0.0000148336685,0.000117803545,0.00001422305,0.000014600331,0.000026406906,0.00048559846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977905,0.00055800454,0.00035363797,0.00037168842,0.0003940456,0.0005321037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997845,0.0009041005,0.00023932653,0.00061054225,0.00023940965,0.00016163499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002017496,0.00019508704,0.0003536266,0.0001632434,0.00041065426,0.000116042116,0.00086953316,0.00030228263,0.00003790997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004761467,0.0001324151,0.00015601852,0.00015261774,0.0013845718,0.000049340382,0.00048197195,0.00079148624,7.155509e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021819882,0.0013004931,0.513454,0.00028955482,0.0020485502,0.00001172965,0.112548284,0.046209577,0.00062620157,0.14135148,0.0006175823,0.17936057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022989153,0.0010506489,0.8399523,0.0005541115,0.00007004262,0.0000019282065,0.1293558,0.008593784,0.00012468443,0.0123450775,0.0047531086,0.00089961814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026517431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005468737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32649827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007124283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009478818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5399731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123810896","doi":"","title":"Poverty-Reducing Tax Reforms with Heterogeneous Agents","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Stochastic dominance; Poverty; Economics; Dominance (genetics); Econometrics; Public economics; Metric (unit); Variation (astronomy); Economic growth","score_opus":0.03845934690610677,"score_gpt":0.3240484207959243,"score_spread":0.2855890738898175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123810896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6967407,0.00013761086,0.0000074183768,0.00026593258,0.00083100784,0.0008796686,0.00007956998,0.000057337078,0.30100077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96164286,0.020816114,0.0011393178,0.00043621068,0.00039602432,0.00019784021,0.000078773504,0.00012230671,0.015170544],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99537385,0.00057734223,0.0006020149,0.0012029037,0.0006941454,0.0015497203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977462,0.00019641875,0.00024823679,0.0011356216,0.00022779909,0.00044570974],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026125687,0.00040555242,0.00059333164,0.000428118,0.00069247454,0.0003645595,0.0011492169,0.00073664973,0.00015120835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003413849,0.00038247707,0.00018682615,0.0002849095,0.0006433044,0.00015921373,0.0006050646,0.0017891572,0.000024479974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066032377,0.0018975871,0.3342827,0.0011025744,0.0016464796,0.0011049483,0.08325049,0.27599707,0.00016151846,0.011637258,0.0022549592,0.28600407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072112447,0.0014401865,0.09958103,0.0025132466,0.0001883258,0.00013913457,0.13415228,0.02947904,0.00023776376,0.025707096,0.69033855,0.009012117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031712481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01301323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6880836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028640362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021544422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123812599","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.105643","title":"Loss aversion and the welfare ranking of policy interventions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spiral (Imperial College London)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Narodowym Centrum Nauki; Narodowe Centrum Nauki","keywords":"Loss aversion; Econometrics; Economics; Resampling; Ranking (information retrieval); Stochastic dominance; Nonparametric statistics; Welfare; Inference; Dominance (genetics); Statistics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.022047480222054695,"score_gpt":0.2997454358884901,"score_spread":0.2776979556664354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123812599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786277,0.00018062103,0.00002374628,0.0057613384,0.0011292698,0.0004726383,0.00013515726,0.00009116893,0.013578404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996814,0.00046862813,0.000047475132,0.00013297796,0.0005273001,0.000016368718,0.000013042163,0.000012562355,0.0019676571],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985912,0.00026901512,0.00028414236,0.00018968806,0.00033029972,0.00033569953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940187,0.00012679258,0.00010903378,0.00017486524,0.00010518048,0.00008223237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091055763,0.00011375856,0.00023963781,0.00016272554,0.0009741571,0.000058549416,0.00029117847,0.000109390545,0.00009714764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003983483,0.00008825622,0.00021112924,0.0010637948,0.0007070582,0.00014136103,0.0001719023,0.000113567636,0.00002362408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002251162,0.000030605508,0.004556024,0.000063730266,0.00004021535,0.000010892313,0.015199005,0.000017515824,0.00018936062,0.97789806,0.00065245293,0.001117025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03829198,0.0010826694,0.14575987,0.0006709414,0.0005100363,0.00002188817,0.36473796,0.0020076947,0.00032234454,0.17255507,0.27207485,0.001964713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038414518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020183842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.805343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068880334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016353528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74925274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123852265","doi":"","title":"Targeting Policies: Multiple Testing and Distributional Treatment Effects","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Michigan Diabetes Research Center, University of Michigan","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Earnings; Distribution (mathematics); Welfare; Inference; Economics; Econometrics; Treatment effect; Public economics; Microeconomics; Medicine; Computer science; Mathematics; Accounting","score_opus":0.05621270622691487,"score_gpt":0.3429477923267637,"score_spread":0.2867350860998488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123852265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9315047,0.00022751286,0.000027549871,0.0006243135,0.0004518799,0.0007719483,0.00046853255,0.000069330956,0.06585419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874752,0.0093974825,0.0008202745,0.000032674958,0.0006820102,0.00014488894,0.00007422336,0.00003294827,0.0013403018],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970837,0.00039266967,0.00043094667,0.0007463918,0.00030555722,0.0010407248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662673,0.00235048,0.00015930684,0.00036426552,0.00020458152,0.00029465312],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017845217,0.00026497187,0.00038085668,0.00022178974,0.00080401084,0.00022595478,0.0004032015,0.0004085843,0.000024656514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003469848,0.00024722706,0.00008987039,0.00014092178,0.00075333973,0.00009752461,0.00059674843,0.0005637935,0.0000071957634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037468206,0.00021198655,0.9042415,0.00008999651,0.0001144804,0.00002457087,0.010455489,0.002011655,0.0003305287,0.005899901,0.000055356773,0.076527044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005283303,0.0005530254,0.68423796,0.0012625355,0.00006638799,0.000013797755,0.08719366,0.05983229,0.00009375237,0.06106729,0.09697435,0.0034216773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003573605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00238916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22000359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002579815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015210938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123857463","doi":"","title":"Localization of Determinants of Fertility Through Measurement Adaptations in Developing-Country Settings: The Case of Iran Comment on 'Analysis of Economic Determinants of Fertility in Iran: A Multilevel Approach'","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Information System of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences (Ardabil University of Medical Sciences)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Developing country; Inequality; Work (physics); Economics; Demographic economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Population; Demography; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.1441105618508553,"score_gpt":0.35156373620858616,"score_spread":0.20745317435773086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123857463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821316,0.000017619686,0.014668076,0.000902981,0.000067167064,0.00053900696,0.00008911492,0.0000055319347,0.0015789213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991133,0.00009375252,0.00076423684,0.000016850154,0.0000035916746,4.0584507e-7,0.0000037833865,0.0000016712063,0.0000024168526],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902817,0.0016506157,0.0013814262,0.0003270068,0.00594014,0.00041910695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959064,0.0012479016,0.0014650389,0.0003513692,0.00079724716,0.00023205017],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034639716,0.00014050398,0.0009271449,0.0008906818,0.00044591565,0.000009765505,0.0022200195,0.00028503896,0.0000659692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027153683,0.00011905234,0.00019623543,0.0031585433,0.009650757,0.00066088553,0.00038871862,0.00024456278,6.239272e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006432517,0.0010766883,0.8088895,0.003519098,0.00017301898,0.000011120638,0.13202997,0.019159088,0.000022861657,0.02168912,0.00006865712,0.012717652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019387858,0.00041905354,0.21676095,0.0012367538,0.00008240691,0.0000017332783,0.33128607,0.44766283,0.00015991523,0.00018300106,0.00013032982,0.00013816096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080408424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043141756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5921285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056284346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027315244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99404156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123976249","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3318798","title":"Great Depression and the Rise of Female Employment: A New Hypothesis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Great Depression; Depression (economics); Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics; Political science; Keynesian economics; Law","score_opus":0.012783035792721208,"score_gpt":0.25047341275851914,"score_spread":0.23769037696579792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123976249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853818,0.00613547,0.0005274893,0.0006768667,0.00015453075,0.00017574136,0.000001017131,0.00001131349,0.006935812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97608846,0.015575557,0.000069087975,0.000056115146,0.0001568129,0.00000132997,1.6025491e-7,0.000009931736,0.008042555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826884,0.00021513907,0.00017156464,0.0001231056,0.0003083818,0.0009129639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944794,0.00014420992,0.00014059783,0.0001317502,0.00005006371,0.0000854661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017095996,0.00008590335,0.00016602722,0.00004726688,0.00030668514,0.000048385926,0.00025686563,0.000068154426,0.000069960915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008301729,0.000055210217,0.000084893574,0.00014524795,0.00015622725,0.00012448653,0.00003189551,0.00048200626,0.000012547468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025744937,0.000054538712,0.6162372,0.000008826217,0.00019992521,0.0000012512575,0.022175692,0.000045718698,0.00025534787,0.30071735,0.00013397631,0.059912696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064249793,0.00032124415,0.10038482,0.000068644375,0.00021451153,0.0000860406,0.08632299,0.0002779144,0.00006894973,0.7933458,0.012088328,0.00039576233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017043334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003616256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5158524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018331665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013572306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25764537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123991929","doi":"10.1111/cdev.13505","title":"Children in the United States and Peru Pay to Correct Gender-Based Inequality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Child Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Inequality; Child development; Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.032283415615760966,"score_gpt":0.28528209823851103,"score_spread":0.25299868262275005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123991929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992333,0.00011863529,0.0009777104,0.0038495446,0.00019295585,0.00028330414,0.000013081272,0.000033581182,0.0021981746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897794,0.0001745159,0.0014640434,0.008141077,0.000065386426,0.000022021759,0.000208211,0.000008550058,0.0001367815],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846303,0.0003528927,0.00022289564,0.00027561313,0.00036612945,0.00031943762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946284,0.000111792666,0.000037291928,0.00017533355,0.00009750902,0.0001152349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009863538,0.0001238262,0.00013710106,0.00009531384,0.00048196854,0.000110537396,0.00021299672,0.000062611296,0.000028763361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017881981,0.00008645439,0.000022985665,0.000790508,0.000068930145,0.000038003658,0.000062044564,0.00016256605,0.000012129127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063253797,0.000119937205,0.85147154,0.000010809113,0.000015627953,0.000009736464,0.14384115,0.00026530708,0.000003369514,0.0011287114,0.0006870559,0.0024404465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025672113,0.00000844872,0.95359933,0.000018538696,0.000004522807,0.0000016162028,0.023635441,0.000052313524,0.00003364095,0.00025353077,0.021971408,0.00016450036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012025139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006005304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1202057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011277306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005199788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37069613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124094117","doi":"","title":"Market work, housework and childcare: A time use approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Fertility; Economics; Baby boom; Work (physics); Matching (statistics); Labour economics; Time allocation; Production (economics); Demographic economics; Wage; Population; Psychology; Medicine; Microeconomics; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.03786155465390714,"score_gpt":0.2707031242560628,"score_spread":0.23284156960215566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124094117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64426744,0.00021096137,0.00017785646,0.0004339566,0.0007786701,0.0009101248,0.000039513805,0.00025216924,0.3529293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8623595,0.0015373686,0.00047464113,0.00002685429,0.0016072491,0.0000070539145,0.00003245811,0.00007508594,0.13387977],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927136,0.0026727538,0.00030037237,0.0014511835,0.001410878,0.0014512253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666315,0.0005889653,0.00021347884,0.0011869682,0.0005161578,0.0008312657],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021176657,0.00044279036,0.00058861787,0.0010592651,0.002369534,0.0010794387,0.0016271309,0.001037261,0.00009967847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003104129,0.0005200775,0.00026209484,0.0017894701,0.0028717506,0.00044122696,0.0022920799,0.0023569446,0.000053586708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005248326,0.00032601747,0.9334669,0.00018665714,0.00055460614,0.0007596819,0.011312311,0.00004068309,0.0000425201,0.008212078,0.044224452,0.00034922766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010410632,0.00029256643,0.7827119,0.00035033224,0.000219373,0.00002018875,0.0123602655,0.0008018149,0.000028207323,0.004129449,0.19640398,0.0016408617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04445465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006459112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21904953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013055208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022483044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124142868","doi":"","title":"WORKING WOMEN, MEN'S HOME TIME AND LOWEST-LOW FERTILITY","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Externality; Economics; Demographic economics; Negative correlation; Positive correlation; Labour economics; Time-use survey; Demography; Sociology; Population; Medicine; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.013992946931944014,"score_gpt":0.2411889396493168,"score_spread":0.22719599271737279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124142868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8839608,0.00155472,0.00007110764,0.00027301142,0.0046810918,0.00076444546,0.00019259295,0.00040569296,0.10809655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98380435,0.00044918788,0.0007660599,0.00032135827,0.0010781382,0.00013454143,0.00009961216,0.00008422839,0.0132625485],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99501497,0.0005208898,0.0009228814,0.001470562,0.0006460629,0.0014246535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971623,0.00043230774,0.00058431074,0.00096745964,0.00020840674,0.0006452585],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020232117,0.0007557447,0.0011505227,0.00034813661,0.0010319817,0.00052748463,0.00092217064,0.0011773249,0.0010997542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019924698,0.00087296555,0.00031369258,0.0003160478,0.0017086624,0.00026475443,0.0006918577,0.0012243829,0.00033804085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029227216,0.0001616053,0.9848279,0.000089030786,0.00013784392,0.000029544606,0.008619724,0.00007636098,0.000023856397,0.00078738184,0.004205955,0.0010115927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008599272,0.000053147993,0.96511567,0.00026270672,0.0001109955,0.0000085563615,0.0042385934,0.00078916474,0.000004698239,0.008950699,0.01786337,0.0017424598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020563514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031633207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09984353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016925556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017390745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124162369","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00403.x","title":"DOUBLE MAJORS: ONE FOR ME, ONE FOR THE PARENTS?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coursework; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Field (mathematics); Sample (material); Graduation (instrument); Mathematics education; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15510585630722834,"score_gpt":0.3210667590808268,"score_spread":0.16596090277359848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124162369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91453373,0.0004953738,0.021298682,0.0015592437,0.013974012,0.0029048284,0.00021170602,0.000165269,0.044857156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878719,0.00023912368,0.0030964392,0.00058403553,0.0031539002,0.00037529977,0.000029243789,0.000030430316,0.0046196673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899846,0.000026338717,0.00024009364,0.00025693426,0.000065021726,0.00041312986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992885,0.00018886196,0.00011601826,0.00027309236,0.00005180733,0.00008172023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080452726,0.00010665322,0.00017590015,0.000035261677,0.00057419477,0.00006484283,0.00043352734,0.00011836975,0.00022498971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031017218,0.00009786072,0.00012122264,0.000040191197,0.00029041604,0.00019075145,0.00004249639,0.0000642483,0.00012931529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034139483,0.00027367915,0.013013042,0.000053100775,0.00034068726,3.5685244e-7,0.15981027,0.00006134948,0.000054474618,0.7939197,0.028370198,0.0037617867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007645997,0.00046136798,0.045228478,0.0000484328,0.00040875425,0.0000011477866,0.25004545,0.0024345708,0.0006066296,0.20557141,0.48619473,0.0013530551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016312996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030052844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58834827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001507044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018555314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44162998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124167215","doi":"","title":"Collective Choice and Individual Action: Education Policy and Social Mobility in England","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Inefficiency; Lottery; Action (physics); Voting; School choice; Cash; Economics; Microeconomics; State (computer science); Class (philosophy); Public economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.034020175211274345,"score_gpt":0.3327722044985233,"score_spread":0.298752029287249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124167215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937259,0.0010317018,0.00007720941,0.0016474127,0.00020867537,0.00013720946,0.0000031451948,0.000011453835,0.0031572753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99615955,0.0012660229,0.000024305253,0.00012344538,0.0011574677,0.000006206041,0.0000025010368,0.000006171311,0.0012543321],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833316,0.00028222273,0.0001379563,0.00014883062,0.00025237544,0.00084543956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955356,0.0000733219,0.000081612365,0.000038702878,0.00013811233,0.00011468362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022873124,0.000083278646,0.000115584044,0.00014385387,0.00051811355,0.000113195376,0.00009675381,0.000112624475,0.0000021806661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030503768,0.000084349515,0.000019331132,0.00034769945,0.00015157962,0.00026783938,0.000024159308,0.00073451037,8.1431375e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054298434,0.00025361523,0.601566,0.000007365802,0.00006865225,4.658092e-7,0.19294181,0.0000051234183,0.0000139636495,0.15306464,0.00010002954,0.051924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012143452,0.00014670764,0.5031619,0.000004011069,0.000020382358,0.00003585172,0.15178762,0.000016701,7.224667e-7,0.33395845,0.009510685,0.00014261068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054565202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09968372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18089381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026413589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023048565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124196631","doi":"","title":"The Pitfalls of Work Requirements in Welfare-to-Work Policies: Experimental Evidence on Human Capital Accumulation in the Self-Sufficiency Project","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Queen's University","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Human capital; Work (physics); Labour economics; Population; Economics; Baseline (sea); Welfare reform; Business; Demographic economics; Political science; Accounting; Economic growth; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.1374305299044338,"score_gpt":0.4352212272763583,"score_spread":0.29779069737192454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124196631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97164273,0.00014768771,3.252729e-7,0.00061057555,0.0001919983,0.0011419381,0.0000024897047,0.000012985541,0.026249241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862623,0.0008037931,0.00006179872,0.00008922009,0.00012710465,0.00014539297,0.0000021775934,0.000014863387,0.0001294434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679786,0.0008810025,0.0004985655,0.00031081756,0.00056917354,0.00094256614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998428,0.00084859994,0.00011231584,0.00046521713,0.000055266533,0.00009061165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006178901,0.00013772253,0.00018494121,0.00030731218,0.0006349127,0.00012503054,0.0009159387,0.000111342786,0.000009251639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000624226,0.00010822794,0.00005842001,0.0009825127,0.00034631052,0.000318598,0.00015882144,0.00039021467,0.0000060378643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010457194,0.0007925074,0.7391056,0.000012465869,0.000012572694,0.0000021988722,0.22519387,0.0006678435,0.00022152913,0.02775815,0.000032795553,0.006095904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027450715,0.00017725589,0.8368213,0.00010471995,0.0000016747796,2.2016572e-7,0.16042595,0.000066622626,0.00002761332,0.00013494518,0.001799149,0.00016602095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024436798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004065819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097715735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012365725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026389002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48832992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124214132","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3323182","title":"What Drives Female Labor Force Participation? Comparable Micro-Level Evidence from Eight Developing and Emerging Economies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Tanzania; Economics; Demographic economics; Developing country; Work (physics); Development economics; Geography; Economic growth; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.04856490085528397,"score_gpt":0.3246315272365211,"score_spread":0.27606662638123713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124214132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93719155,0.04274933,0.014743445,0.0025433656,0.0022001516,0.0003466738,0.000023361594,0.00005552554,0.00014657323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79514325,0.19970213,0.0017962513,0.00018446747,0.0005639173,0.000017608494,0.00002033002,0.00003989071,0.002532189],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99587303,0.0003608086,0.0005819176,0.0005750568,0.00036541373,0.002243745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983208,0.00036675282,0.00056641473,0.0002951271,0.00028800298,0.0001628762],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022190476,0.00034333774,0.0005374947,0.0001549646,0.00086088874,0.0011009324,0.0006890357,0.00031077283,0.000027867894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016424022,0.0003531291,0.00013419458,0.00016123289,0.00020038744,0.0012492245,0.00030457004,0.002038808,0.00002493112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008603224,0.000082358216,0.75540394,0.00016015512,0.0011607714,0.000006391388,0.12616496,0.007487936,0.0004531534,0.101642855,0.00018674205,0.007164687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095175725,0.00010991687,0.19986781,0.0020649475,0.0003339575,0.000016442546,0.2714562,0.0032636912,0.00017624172,0.5167918,0.0033948496,0.0015723396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020878601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031152261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55553615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017079106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007941132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124280767","doi":"","title":"Patronage Politics and the Development of the Welfare State: Confederate Pensions in the American South","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Download; Politics; Legislature; Democracy; State (computer science); Pension; Cash transfers; Political science; Census; Developing country; Welfare; Public administration; Cash; Economic growth; Economics; Sociology; Law; Finance; Voting; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.018382901765929542,"score_gpt":0.26975991358624607,"score_spread":0.2513770118203165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124280767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98988724,0.0003888307,0.00041483768,0.0071512293,0.000110263165,0.00018121916,0.0000037520206,0.000005075615,0.0018575401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987539,0.00049608684,0.00005179686,0.00031553177,0.000052356456,0.0000035399107,6.334153e-7,0.0000069022353,0.00031923447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975185,0.0006685053,0.00024518368,0.00009238776,0.00043543655,0.0010399866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937457,0.00008894031,0.00021156178,0.00012840626,0.00013019945,0.00006632943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004111038,0.00009067135,0.00014769193,0.00003241033,0.0010728764,0.00008806632,0.0004124849,0.000025157304,0.0000016158576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001492374,0.000042788608,0.000047463724,0.000239796,0.00063675776,0.00005055989,0.000053289117,0.00081286917,0.0000011755716],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035060715,0.000035593555,0.04900062,0.0000018325825,0.00005534703,9.964506e-7,0.22230193,0.000058850892,0.0000044749017,0.72634965,0.000027256317,0.0021283582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085628673,0.000046729438,0.0944792,0.000006693,0.000021699505,0.000016484368,0.7724178,0.00006938809,0.0000014094963,0.1289575,0.003030714,0.00009608577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016563168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047616392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5973922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028245235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004475837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96976215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124320315","doi":"10.1111/ecca.2015.82.issue-328","title":"Take-up of Free School Meals: price effects and peer effects","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peer effects; Entitlement (fair division); Instrumental variable; Quarter (Canadian coin); Welfare; Point (geometry); Peer group; Identification (biology); School choice; Fixed effects model; Psychology; Economics; Demographic economics; Panel data; Social psychology; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.030450078697050017,"score_gpt":0.33163912991562683,"score_spread":0.3011890512185768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124320315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8457271,0.0013009785,0.000014488636,0.00032563542,0.0017437635,0.0016707982,0.000058062757,0.000051362455,0.1491078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974326,0.01827291,0.0009293298,0.00008892853,0.0006362335,0.0002228004,0.000026527096,0.0000707174,0.0054265386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953045,0.001164283,0.0005843829,0.0008444331,0.00082817004,0.0012742006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950844,0.0024116356,0.00029044063,0.0011793264,0.00040207763,0.0006320882],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063235615,0.00035653735,0.0007793156,0.0004591638,0.0003490737,0.00019117388,0.0012627498,0.0009129219,0.00004790347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070758914,0.00038730187,0.00017217179,0.00024546054,0.0009264602,0.00021366074,0.0015463383,0.0017928398,0.000014747541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040886475,0.0011191576,0.6467239,0.010015497,0.0010629193,0.00009049752,0.079694405,0.0013090537,0.0017196485,0.037210017,0.0027090218,0.217937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055464357,0.00041586818,0.86347795,0.0016902147,0.000168111,0.000007738712,0.02743709,0.0023134842,0.00045768902,0.037609406,0.05836161,0.0025144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016495845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020830494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21675403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096074643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013345149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124329310","doi":"","title":"Migration Responses to Conflict: Evidence from the Border of the American Civil War","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Spanish Civil War; Relocation; Download; Destinations; State (computer science); Soviet union; Political science; Developing country; Demographic economics; World War II; Development economics; Political economy; Economic growth; Law; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.019357900259369364,"score_gpt":0.30969652706406425,"score_spread":0.2903386268046949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124329310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96629024,0.0017383781,0.004687459,0.026654977,0.00022744117,0.0001387175,0.000010271722,0.000011855622,0.0002406695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835214,0.0135544455,0.00003772015,0.0006960954,0.00029550036,0.000003887674,1.7488362e-7,0.000008481486,0.001882283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769056,0.00060547417,0.00020587334,0.00013795134,0.0004730247,0.0008870979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985626,0.00070834585,0.00023649819,0.00023744507,0.0001886963,0.00006641671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022205524,0.00008845685,0.00012517952,0.000031223124,0.00053613,0.000035389574,0.0006630323,0.000036060137,0.000026655782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011188185,0.000041469844,0.000094049305,0.00038877543,0.00034187114,0.00014865294,0.000041187963,0.0003900373,0.0000124893395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030505718,0.000053783067,0.8453091,0.000001357597,0.0001604218,8.5337194e-7,0.04499906,0.000018234725,0.013670431,0.058924787,0.0016551295,0.0349018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030873605,0.0003131956,0.84171575,0.00012302258,0.000061914776,0.000008068548,0.07914163,0.000014262456,0.00025625853,0.04999076,0.027856767,0.00020962424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009096085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11000933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10091324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042967906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003076309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99750245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124340566","doi":"","title":"Household Responses to Individual Shocks: Disability and Labor Supply","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Human capital; Odds; British Household Panel Survey; Labour supply; Labour economics; Linkage (software); Exploit; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.02468034389849458,"score_gpt":0.2745973226404763,"score_spread":0.24991697874198174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124340566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846927,0.00056787976,0.000017585118,0.0035293212,0.0010471024,0.0005481112,0.00065781,0.00027411737,0.0086653745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99421674,0.0001773251,0.0010067021,0.0025792469,0.00047494943,0.000024746367,0.000014471147,0.00002384746,0.001481977],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971853,0.0003981909,0.00047310125,0.0007002502,0.00045705598,0.00078613934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811906,0.0005119081,0.0001249034,0.0005114399,0.00010397188,0.00062874076],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013759191,0.00031684127,0.00043719873,0.00016242683,0.0008077617,0.0002513915,0.0005163108,0.0002828064,0.00035760124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006444211,0.00033691368,0.00011981062,0.00046241938,0.0011224848,0.0004226733,0.00009769977,0.00030181155,0.000079020305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050828174,0.00014381616,0.9799866,0.0000066541006,0.000024787085,0.000009254726,0.007418702,0.0000050754056,0.00005394861,0.0074480125,0.0040986384,0.00075367163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000436493,0.00015988672,0.97861564,0.000019967429,0.000035601333,0.000008165378,0.0066369516,0.0000056764156,0.000017326567,0.0012176989,0.012416486,0.00043009358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062652165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036130555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009524036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032272693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059417414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990827},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3124361241","doi":"","title":"Marriage, Labor Supply, and Home Production","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Matching (statistics); Production (economics); Marriage market; Sorting; Labour economics; Wage; Identification (biology); Panel data; Estimator; Nonparametric statistics; Microeconomics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.028803681864225807,"score_gpt":0.32412137023670057,"score_spread":0.29531768837247474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124361241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8959958,0.00031358827,0.0000025918525,0.0032017366,0.0019255994,0.0009356031,0.00015203965,0.00006801608,0.09740505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90610725,0.07419611,0.0004350321,0.00007731419,0.0013689224,0.00018920959,0.000036681606,0.0000593054,0.017530167],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996612,0.00059836486,0.00042864092,0.0010352777,0.00038562444,0.00094008807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998255,0.00034279437,0.0001444381,0.0007353675,0.00023639062,0.00028600486],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034781047,0.00025332664,0.00041026753,0.0004228663,0.00048044426,0.00025500797,0.0006201794,0.00060076104,0.00010039556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090501964,0.00025132272,0.00008666976,0.0001782279,0.0009830447,0.00018757085,0.00077048055,0.0010518827,0.00001715643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014366348,0.00025699497,0.6488737,0.00039002232,0.00017474193,0.000043686206,0.019584918,0.00038032225,0.0003734982,0.025886552,0.000857706,0.30303422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012950839,0.00013711229,0.6341397,0.0005667778,0.000029325936,0.000008336913,0.030030547,0.00045653307,0.000045732206,0.10647336,0.2252188,0.0015986437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005762461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044624405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3014356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009955324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012316759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124370547","doi":"10.1111/caje.12181","title":"Estimating labour supply responses and welfare participation: Using a natural experiment to validate a structural labour supply model","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Labour supply; Economics; Labour economics; Work (physics); Replicate; Welfare reform; Market economy","score_opus":0.16090830545062967,"score_gpt":0.27459855597697524,"score_spread":0.11369025052634557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124370547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99267495,0.00029529593,0.00016019332,0.004310306,0.0017653198,0.00029926392,0.00036988355,0.000010655345,0.00011413262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844494,0.000015920094,0.01368088,0.0007843831,0.00063447055,0.0000115492685,0.000008256537,0.000041128274,0.00037404196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978021,0.000184154,0.0007014071,0.00034699132,0.000013513563,0.00095188303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955732,0.00007864778,0.0004008746,0.0002453783,0.00042708204,0.0032747674],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010821541,0.00027408876,0.00048935256,0.000478813,0.0006509256,0.0004163621,0.00044841043,0.00015995321,0.00006699626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005469139,0.00032631744,0.0000876861,0.0001814626,0.00020312353,0.00069779495,0.000038948976,0.00028306566,0.0000028307554],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020924988,0.000010796051,0.07833641,0.000036339203,0.00014223509,0.00017849154,0.09913048,0.30982944,0.000083847466,0.5102905,0.00021354988,0.0015386242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038349393,0.0009592477,0.056171786,0.00035836708,0.00021476211,0.0007434665,0.12244729,0.586721,0.00015346763,0.21167696,0.014032821,0.0026858714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31804684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9497257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6316789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028703008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005091527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124404855","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2199586","title":"Fighting Poverty: Assessing the Effect of a Guaranteed Minimum Income Proposals in Québec","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Economics; Public economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.006477685947448831,"score_gpt":0.2728562473051397,"score_spread":0.26637856135769084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124404855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99293643,0.0014567333,0.00033325137,0.0016024272,0.00019365207,0.00034260415,6.309821e-7,0.000018853834,0.0031154111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867433,0.00039568084,0.000033396114,0.00012062385,0.00018669844,0.000010668359,4.4805884e-7,0.00001536995,0.0005628033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996629,0.0007386617,0.00038662434,0.00014834393,0.00042835885,0.0016689984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990241,0.00042788827,0.0002533337,0.0001389074,0.00009668997,0.000059061622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004590763,0.00014069195,0.00026182487,0.00011406602,0.0005146972,0.00016202044,0.0004705065,0.00010381478,0.00003485338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044974868,0.00008821395,0.00011774945,0.00042174148,0.00015514361,0.00035606997,0.00003809071,0.0012095054,0.000014367177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023900504,0.000052979223,0.9513654,0.000027042825,0.00011079138,0.000003829566,0.013046108,0.00005040618,0.0021629871,0.017626159,0.00008690736,0.015443487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00627619,0.0024611661,0.45546833,0.0006657058,0.00025476562,0.00026570554,0.26283735,0.0070531648,0.0004671243,0.2601761,0.00269602,0.0013783906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04268615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10024563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49589708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096829655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041476083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9636887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124422129","doi":"","title":"Are Women Pawns in the Political Game? Evidence from Elections to the Spanish Senate","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; NOMINATE; Nomination; Politics; Political science; Order (exchange); Competition (biology); Secret ballot; Political economy; Law; Voting; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06367944580439737,"score_gpt":0.36422383710214445,"score_spread":0.30054439129774707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124422129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93819577,0.00015372812,0.000009931694,0.02048139,0.00047504462,0.0011437881,0.00010038358,0.000036956026,0.03940302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98864526,0.0069804564,0.00011766964,0.0022564626,0.00075979496,0.00036633667,0.000009715131,0.000026704029,0.0008376119],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944952,0.0018406655,0.00051246455,0.00085182453,0.00060768874,0.0016921555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642354,0.0018117887,0.00014352,0.0011138172,0.00016544678,0.00034186264],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051271333,0.00025508407,0.00040129593,0.00028508084,0.0005880177,0.00058627117,0.002083183,0.00045171406,0.000048427213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002898082,0.00020204483,0.00013369303,0.00050968066,0.00053341873,0.00012112924,0.00060732046,0.0024715743,0.000033924756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027711716,0.0010708189,0.47178686,0.00013224893,0.00029116092,0.00025821137,0.34105644,0.031555936,0.00011673656,0.086804785,0.0017960959,0.06485359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027356032,0.000086970256,0.57828397,0.0003918951,0.0000127981775,0.000002900291,0.313465,0.002066822,0.0000054544294,0.061898574,0.0429056,0.00060648314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011574165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12582304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11424887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030501683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014353349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124477828","doi":"10.1257/jep.26.2.141","title":"Why is the Teen Birth Rate in the United States So High and Why Does It Matter?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"The Journal of Economic Perspectives","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Birth rate; Demographic economics; Face (sociological concept); Economics; Demography; Fertility; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.021897951628444844,"score_gpt":0.27992546455955586,"score_spread":0.25802751293111104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124477828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90414566,0.002104224,0.0000820768,0.09100862,0.00068387,0.00029044482,0.0000851049,0.000007421952,0.0015925835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704501,0.020379182,0.000036936384,0.007911259,0.0008305661,0.0000058032642,0.0000030965502,0.000020919444,0.00036214376],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974525,0.0013550824,0.00045584567,0.00019485656,0.00017563756,0.00036606702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780214,0.00091122463,0.0007040747,0.00037071857,0.00013127991,0.00008056941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041902624,0.00024480833,0.00037258686,0.00019779595,0.00060998584,0.0004289823,0.0012550076,0.00014262614,0.00028732128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049985152,0.000110549656,0.0001383749,0.0001247141,0.000996551,0.0002436181,0.0002336751,0.00091067364,0.000013351607],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075059455,0.00006896136,0.022830533,0.000019781784,0.0003171465,0.0000026758717,0.94935966,0.0022763426,0.000011528108,0.0074082003,0.01755926,0.00007084316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030438908,0.00003134088,0.101313315,0.000050238436,0.00012552565,0.000009882615,0.80359054,0.00032127762,0.0000024200158,0.06787586,0.026155002,0.00022019661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02115374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013708562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14576912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003420203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027529127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9853645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124522969","doi":"10.1111/caje.12250","title":"Male wage inequality and marital dissolution: Is there a link?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Remarriage; Economics; Inequality; Wage; Wage dispersion; Demographic economics; Wage inequality; Labour economics; Dispersion (optics); Economic inequality; Efficiency wage; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13028037066979312,"score_gpt":0.23098499274901405,"score_spread":0.10070462207922093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124522969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97676927,0.00041485677,0.000026165782,0.009347435,0.0015053449,0.000165337,0.00036017672,0.000004711272,0.011406715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951545,0.000682997,0.00024950207,0.0005872101,0.001160849,0.0000040982404,0.000006126331,0.000026143172,0.0021285508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834275,0.000091900474,0.0005321663,0.00028936617,0.000005091746,0.00073875184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965295,0.000082425715,0.000650114,0.0004835672,0.00019850906,0.0020558794],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011722201,0.00020313685,0.0004334793,0.00020531306,0.0014414506,0.00057974935,0.0007921105,0.00026395416,0.0003761801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036474518,0.0002447295,0.00015640885,0.000042266973,0.00065798743,0.0007497205,0.000039259045,0.00034109555,0.000012561739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016767697,0.00000710673,0.5472341,0.000020236708,0.00009327091,0.00014961287,0.013045224,0.00004863037,0.0000017300475,0.43448123,0.00067886483,0.0042231954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014051772,0.00029543022,0.508635,0.00015326259,0.00010520076,0.00046599848,0.019360457,0.0010268177,0.000006283864,0.28927964,0.17822942,0.0010373242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99616957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47771955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012589867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029058866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124569993","doi":"","title":"Distributional Impacts of the Self-Sufficiency Project","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Subsidy; Receipt; Economics; Distribution (mathematics); Transfer payment; Welfare; Quantile; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Counterfactual thinking; Demographic economics; Sample (material); Labour economics; Survey data collection; Econometrics; Statistics; Accounting","score_opus":0.009036842931010581,"score_gpt":0.27413218282201995,"score_spread":0.26509533989100936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124569993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829338,0.00121645,0.0012202098,0.0024082628,0.00031534387,0.00018742374,0.000014866863,0.000033108423,0.011670503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960217,0.0025729327,0.00009519212,0.00007469519,0.0004938661,0.0000016422772,0.0000017528389,0.000006928105,0.00073131954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973029,0.00018155448,0.00023335392,0.00011271897,0.00056210125,0.001607383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941653,0.00004267276,0.00018295547,0.00012273961,0.0001689195,0.00006619389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00210146,0.000093473245,0.00010927206,0.00004836294,0.00073113514,0.00004311148,0.00048641177,0.000078596575,0.0000192977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015605956,0.00006445493,0.00014046225,0.00045830276,0.00015683979,0.0001750571,0.000032391807,0.0008537387,0.0000074320824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008256552,0.00018779641,0.048402283,0.0000026871558,0.000056139368,2.8045153e-7,0.004996126,0.000026793765,0.0001366787,0.9439257,0.0002884722,0.0019687912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028003124,0.00085461105,0.31909668,0.000077851764,0.00027535297,0.0003918139,0.13556926,0.0011313729,0.00015974983,0.36547613,0.17311868,0.0010482022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044763743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071780016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5784496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001424337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011741629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124582920","doi":"","title":"The effect of universal child benefits on labour supply","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour supply; Flexibility (engineering); Economics; Child labour; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Child care; Significant difference; Medicine; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.01647541230272433,"score_gpt":0.2932998371508636,"score_spread":0.2768244248481393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124582920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81050676,0.00020333569,2.0504447e-7,0.00071231526,0.00071351,0.00097378704,0.000107387044,0.000025646177,0.18675704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623857,0.032856278,0.00003276403,0.00003944021,0.00031124012,0.00009181862,0.000025949485,0.000040646122,0.0042161494],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964175,0.0010866775,0.00042673387,0.0006224878,0.0005183193,0.0009282626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964901,0.0020229085,0.0002075006,0.00088591257,0.00017807561,0.0002154796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038455268,0.00027011544,0.00046618914,0.00028070927,0.0008317266,0.00021153121,0.001447383,0.00055403344,0.00006760033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081248267,0.00022443345,0.0002044961,0.00020117662,0.0009183713,0.000084193874,0.00069259066,0.0016845568,0.000026337691],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050273957,0.00025259025,0.23568672,0.00039825833,0.0004514625,0.000024035,0.013470106,0.04351128,0.000026469073,0.21410653,0.00055284984,0.49101695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043714116,0.002192685,0.69271404,0.0015016434,0.000074679374,0.000004326335,0.048995875,0.008505133,0.00030182872,0.011959526,0.22706228,0.0023165916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035328201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067726416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48870036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092631736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005852036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.915213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124597921","doi":"","title":"Bundling services and household welfare in developing countries - the case of Peru","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Consumption (sociology); Panel data; Social Welfare; Developing country; Economics; Business; Econometrics; Economic growth; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.042625119054510226,"score_gpt":0.3218792641668015,"score_spread":0.2792541451122913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124597921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98421824,0.00065000076,0.00000298107,0.00201558,0.0002706285,0.00059190113,0.00008066324,0.000022287726,0.012147708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.949947,0.049291976,0.00033834207,0.00012703566,0.00010729518,0.000052728163,0.000011209625,0.000029353054,0.00009508813],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976168,0.00036727573,0.00054010615,0.00056513905,0.00023991216,0.0006707596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862415,0.00047038685,0.00018262918,0.00047687173,0.00014270456,0.000103246035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003295539,0.00021343879,0.00040939887,0.0003390666,0.0006406452,0.00025406713,0.00065394066,0.0004310553,0.000009632986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015726183,0.0002013071,0.000065301974,0.00022190512,0.00085767766,0.00013488105,0.0007665048,0.0010044626,5.645824e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011869107,0.00019659204,0.48068902,0.0031375955,0.00020720204,0.0010128585,0.23319317,0.07910049,0.000008383683,0.17104682,0.0000050394337,0.031284135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018090701,0.00009132941,0.20938782,0.0020145995,0.000038417966,0.000107356325,0.70945835,0.008526757,0.000018476056,0.025176888,0.04182575,0.0015451701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02407683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17647105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4762652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011342311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015981676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98242193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124645842","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3442406","title":"The Effect of Paid Parental Leave on Breastfeeding, Parental Health and Behavior","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parental leave; Breastfeeding; Developmental psychology; Psychology; Environmental health; Medicine; Pediatrics; Engineering","score_opus":0.006839277656605386,"score_gpt":0.2763797388718582,"score_spread":0.26954046121525277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124645842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99466485,0.0024093296,0.000018523157,0.0006203954,0.000576974,0.00029204544,0.0000056741906,0.000015457996,0.0013967607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931391,0.005836881,0.0000036708534,0.00005348052,0.00020301607,0.000005545197,0.000003295901,0.000013449977,0.0007415468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972644,0.00034023088,0.0002356951,0.0001644157,0.00044808275,0.001547174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931955,0.00015671848,0.0002097697,0.00011036628,0.00003804698,0.00016551795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027128174,0.00013419699,0.00020716933,0.000050176455,0.000757027,0.00007336148,0.0002525692,0.00006918525,0.000010883418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004603553,0.00009081647,0.000101724094,0.0001230277,0.00017196489,0.000099381105,0.000029293251,0.00089072285,0.00001127573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008806214,0.000050531387,0.91791576,0.000008464554,0.000047779573,7.769354e-7,0.0030751282,0.000002883118,0.000053526306,0.041818842,0.000065899214,0.03687235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00550021,0.01743431,0.7153686,0.00018649347,0.00018509768,0.0003925309,0.23485193,0.00016373688,0.00008798598,0.020898592,0.0041499604,0.0007805432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000968588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055165463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2317768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068511034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013280658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5822516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124658769","doi":"","title":"Intergenerational Effects of Disability Benefits - Evidence from Canadian Social Assistance Programs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Scholar Works  (Boise State University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Anxiety; Developmental psychology; Cognitive skill; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.02217231089873427,"score_gpt":0.24320527341412118,"score_spread":0.2210329625153869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124658769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99282956,0.0007785604,0.0006862164,0.00050514465,0.0015433226,0.00089435745,0.00036853683,0.00007953088,0.0023147734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949558,0.0015647657,0.0016929186,0.000047990936,0.00026447413,0.000007693341,0.00025564764,0.000023497987,0.0011872405],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969201,0.0007985185,0.00030365933,0.00075281184,0.00062407204,0.00060080516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978937,0.00022767938,0.0003108871,0.0004437126,0.0006240202,0.00049998576],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057273055,0.00032302915,0.000434231,0.00020148177,0.0011014773,0.000382716,0.0010938904,0.0005854978,0.00010549792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033380065,0.0003947678,0.0002553833,0.000676771,0.0007860921,0.00086407294,0.00039724293,0.0012431097,0.000019406116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001741375,0.00053915626,0.8414512,0.00053272775,0.0007358615,0.00011086892,0.06621184,0.002940012,0.0001321591,0.024079915,0.0014290522,0.061663035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010268181,0.0000912139,0.9427981,0.00318867,0.00042471307,1.9178916e-7,0.019394921,0.0007181131,0.000053754105,0.010444582,0.02009823,0.0017606951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3158382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72020984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40437165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001843708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016787243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124659787","doi":"10.3386/w11587","title":"The Intergenerational Effect of Worker Displacement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Displacement (psychology); Labour economics; Demographic economics; Business; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.20038900968603224,"score_gpt":0.5172078110780696,"score_spread":0.31681880139203733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124659787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021037575,0.0017080626,0.000013521129,0.0012396307,0.0016179311,0.0007284989,0.00011941232,0.000008527427,0.97352684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9289985,0.00801013,0.00007510908,0.000010910645,0.0027592254,0.0001293863,0.00030076428,0.00002494913,0.059691068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953721,0.00065455225,0.0006599169,0.00030199508,0.0026278968,0.00038354786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946627,0.0028022288,0.00032215437,0.0002277385,0.0018951101,0.000090065485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01563625,0.00014729025,0.0003261597,0.0002901659,0.00055870257,0.000079436744,0.0006676127,0.00030194927,0.00055147836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018422322,0.00011233037,0.00020186813,0.00018270072,0.00075630733,0.0000938718,0.00013486635,0.00046507348,0.000052672112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014875962,0.00009499946,0.016567748,0.000101888145,0.00047232714,7.7038646e-7,0.0011577045,0.0018558023,0.000049490496,0.78809315,0.18426615,0.00719121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010813706,0.0004109197,0.018071938,0.0002380104,0.00006260459,0.0000030872038,0.0016790546,0.001970889,0.00015080048,0.07296471,0.9028684,0.0004981959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002826844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006306855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91383576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021953445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066336836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124679790","doi":"","title":"How's Life at Home? New Evidence on Marriage and the Set Point for Happiness","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Set point; Set (abstract data type); Point (geometry); Psychology; Demographic economics; Economics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.021533807920035883,"score_gpt":0.27131509477105964,"score_spread":0.24978128685102374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124679790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7953168,0.01211078,0.09351569,0.09389612,0.0015176727,0.00094775844,0.000008875996,0.000073699775,0.0026125954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97558635,0.010517758,0.00008055225,0.0010318379,0.0012788348,0.000008981166,0.0000013727728,0.000016705497,0.011477625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974293,0.0003240895,0.0001743129,0.00020628599,0.00038353953,0.001482487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876827,0.0005920155,0.00016137454,0.0001706471,0.00010144566,0.00020622133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047065276,0.00014110545,0.0002090261,0.00005085407,0.0010865378,0.00028021136,0.0004026225,0.00009311566,0.00001054457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001214575,0.00009375732,0.00010630737,0.0001496574,0.00022381762,0.00023509844,0.00004507431,0.00064475706,0.000006552084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028288094,0.000014286506,0.0038391014,0.000009182632,0.00007931435,4.55626e-7,0.0058997343,0.000022254502,0.00004135745,0.98058844,0.002602237,0.0066207405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030954874,0.0004469978,0.0055482476,0.000058184203,0.00008811456,0.000039330047,0.025309224,0.0006396965,0.0000056437225,0.9331052,0.03134347,0.00032041327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003992828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008652001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18026952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050252257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001766224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83568805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124687749","doi":"10.1920/wp.ifs.2009.0911","title":"New evidence on taxes and portfolio choice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Portfolio; Capital income; Gross income; Adjusted gross income; International taxation; Differential (mechanical device); Income tax; Labour economics; Distribution (mathematics); Double taxation; State income tax; Demographic economics; Tax reform; Public economics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.06542798997723168,"score_gpt":0.35959341932446093,"score_spread":0.2941654293472292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124687749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003033603,0.0043993243,0.00035210288,0.0010740474,0.00416204,0.00030498233,0.00004974769,0.000044141245,0.98658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012563909,0.02706374,0.0003483969,0.0007451982,0.0021030153,0.000006752913,0.000017007762,0.000022870097,0.9571291],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982469,0.000095618714,0.00019711124,0.0005032358,0.00052273157,0.00043439915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851793,0.00029707546,0.00023904612,0.0005178151,0.00010799913,0.0003201103],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037722787,0.00026268105,0.00034785885,0.00009730569,0.00084204535,0.0004964048,0.00072900526,0.0005011439,0.0037198067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046050563,0.00023141333,0.00007417016,0.0000985486,0.00025214042,0.00027640373,0.00010114118,0.00033293208,0.0027299314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000395167,0.000009663837,0.00208611,0.0000241038,0.000020867832,0.0000033768786,0.0013379372,0.0000024454903,0.000003733442,0.0057606995,0.98615104,0.004596077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107579115,0.000050243674,0.0118059255,0.00022410696,0.000030691244,5.748916e-7,0.0010384348,0.000004434742,0.0000022463967,0.00061657245,0.98576885,0.0003503414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065430924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0238202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04161072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082403545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010925323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124723329","doi":"","title":"A Comparison of Micro and Macro Expenditure Measures Across Countries Using Differing Survey Methods","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Consumer Expenditure Survey; Data collection; Download; Developing country; Macro; Survey data collection; Economics; Demographic economics; Inequality; Aggregate expenditure; Geography; Business; Econometrics; Statistics; Public economics; Economic growth; Mathematics","score_opus":0.052227005192347416,"score_gpt":0.3996887313838558,"score_spread":0.3474617261915084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124723329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95494837,0.008321865,0.036045827,0.00008520773,0.00031418903,0.00014419196,0.000009775822,0.000017382308,0.00011317104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930707,0.003750779,0.0027748675,0.000031834472,0.00015673773,0.0000022362449,0.0000020264838,0.000018188923,0.00019261648],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651235,0.0007770063,0.00036325125,0.00018301634,0.00037209693,0.0017922679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989805,0.00023426361,0.00026769526,0.00011620585,0.00027802808,0.00012326778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005003932,0.00016108176,0.00036676257,0.000060980936,0.0008883488,0.00022949389,0.00029255723,0.00015421321,0.000019827554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001961453,0.0001435104,0.000072278395,0.00017380793,0.00032332368,0.00027931615,0.000056266737,0.0009075592,0.0000017998856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027211448,0.00005230771,0.9428058,0.000014830505,0.0001571394,5.7196775e-7,0.033616822,0.00006376431,0.009099368,0.0056412364,0.000039400245,0.008481507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010503081,0.00020353611,0.65688777,0.00006196922,0.000082567276,0.00008489601,0.28738096,0.001809071,0.001010015,0.049420286,0.0013720895,0.00063653704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009892586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028871661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2859181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047160796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001198047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99670064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124740589","doi":"","title":"The Effect of Marginal Tax Rates on Taxable Income: A Panel Study of the 1988 Tax Flattening in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Taxable income; Economics; State income tax; Tax reform; Gross income; Adjusted gross income; Labour economics; Indirect tax; Income tax; Value-added tax; International taxation; Dividend tax; Ad valorem tax; Demographic economics; Public economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.024165762149340114,"score_gpt":0.30503239229094203,"score_spread":0.2808666301416019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124740589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97372144,0.00008974212,8.2196735e-8,0.00020474488,0.0004608779,0.0016674186,0.00007828832,0.0000053935546,0.023772009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99569666,0.002480348,0.0000112839625,0.00001721252,0.000076338576,0.00018296907,0.0000047082917,0.000028504473,0.0015019976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994796,0.0022573231,0.0007515617,0.00057288614,0.0007394615,0.000882764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586874,0.0025879645,0.00037551427,0.000953707,0.00009949795,0.00011459264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005397882,0.0002685728,0.0006344662,0.00022455856,0.00053275033,0.000091876565,0.0016875393,0.00023325595,0.00002860349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000796718,0.00019124639,0.0001224712,0.00042075838,0.0005575411,0.000050471128,0.0006586187,0.0017005048,0.0000010437249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021975454,0.000097750955,0.9298304,0.00009170376,0.00008480211,0.00001393837,0.0050890828,0.047769208,0.000011047649,0.00010883477,0.00004790091,0.016635597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013620321,0.00042320316,0.9320043,0.0003785834,0.00001917738,8.6766636e-7,0.058216892,0.004859142,0.000051636092,0.0004853634,0.0018303262,0.00036850083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88848156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9828379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09435635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024065673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004459523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79110026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124852216","doi":"","title":"Changing the Rules Midway: The Impact of Granting Alimony Rights on Existing and Newly-Formed Partnerships","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alimony; Cohabitation; Beneficiary; Legislature; Economics; Matching (statistics); Affect (linguistics); Political science; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Public economics; Law; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.11308854977459666,"score_gpt":0.37757445628976294,"score_spread":0.2644859065151663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124852216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9019519,0.00024245057,0.0000042354245,0.00037240572,0.0003438207,0.00072023505,0.000039423645,0.000024953926,0.09630055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99520564,0.003219771,0.00014533599,0.000034951765,0.0007649775,0.00006624365,0.000018125767,0.000032360364,0.00051257736],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963309,0.0009680358,0.00050689065,0.0004942964,0.00041583373,0.0012840376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964054,0.0022457228,0.00034333565,0.00068782445,0.0001276305,0.00019007262],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008545031,0.00028457568,0.00042959765,0.00030942328,0.0015316777,0.0002595552,0.00091814535,0.00036193564,0.000016674923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079324737,0.00018059077,0.00023083162,0.00023423923,0.0011869759,0.00012494842,0.00067667494,0.001449622,0.0000033332094],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029962213,0.00042784787,0.27440766,0.00045796167,0.0008868849,0.000023049377,0.37449247,0.012662404,0.00013314946,0.12504284,0.00009364407,0.21107247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021412638,0.0003338684,0.3355861,0.0019131959,0.00014501535,0.000016082306,0.44501725,0.03925785,0.000112218244,0.16048396,0.012561193,0.002431989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004002182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004825814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20864049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059615663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062090106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124867269","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4991.2007.00239.x/enhancedabs","title":"Families, Time and Money in Canada, Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Crunch; Demographic economics; Economic shortage; Economics; Work hours; Work (physics); Labour economics; Demography; Working hours; Sociology; Population; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.020267289173573292,"score_gpt":0.2538691387942679,"score_spread":0.23360184962069463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124867269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98454463,0.0019936275,0.000026171328,0.0023470982,0.0015005781,0.0010169144,0.0003891781,0.00007955857,0.008102224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98886746,0.0055099186,0.0000959313,0.0033859804,0.00030485325,0.0000561073,0.00027711166,0.000055133507,0.0014475058],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615985,0.00091103645,0.0007769543,0.0007207088,0.00055214297,0.0008793278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99591607,0.002378408,0.00046222552,0.00068999507,0.00023209647,0.00032118376],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026287737,0.00053777447,0.00073026185,0.0005728329,0.0010144995,0.00030436701,0.00088536675,0.0004697205,0.00013226176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038487278,0.00039907108,0.0001041271,0.00076876493,0.0028640074,0.00011565437,0.00059044285,0.0013499944,0.000015680544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052764924,0.000035196837,0.9593764,0.000050807008,0.00019156859,0.000046636247,0.02241899,0.0010541081,0.000003248687,0.009707465,0.0068635405,0.00019929779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002559189,0.000026109086,0.7869228,0.00022999801,0.0002221922,0.000031572406,0.050806277,0.0190953,0.0000026606997,0.0037882756,0.13493137,0.0013842229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9714125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96927094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17245354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011425577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037253932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124896484","doi":"","title":"Life After Welfare: The Economic Well-being of Welfare Leavers in Canada During the 1990s","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Earnings; Demographic economics; Economics; Longitudinal data; Labour economics; Term (time); Demography; Market economy; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.02782353113605618,"score_gpt":0.31020941744122926,"score_spread":0.2823858863051731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124896484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.921253,0.0019792316,6.2908373e-7,0.03833006,0.00026022262,0.00034574946,0.000009444121,0.000011177252,0.03781045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936316,0.004472438,0.0000062116646,0.00039026074,0.00010232902,0.00006617057,6.5889833e-7,0.000014543182,0.0013157879],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665034,0.0008408165,0.00039351883,0.00033197348,0.00084755436,0.0009358129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984822,0.00068029744,0.000050237362,0.00037902952,0.00021282498,0.0001953951],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019420829,0.0001712142,0.00034624324,0.00007371925,0.0019199243,0.00008554945,0.0005276006,0.000067596826,0.0004131343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016692734,0.00010695987,0.000095088704,0.0006596943,0.001723466,0.00024027315,0.00021040605,0.0005022064,0.000014070345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014427592,0.000037687772,0.59692883,0.00014503552,0.0004894647,0.00004934828,0.03206745,0.00062039687,0.000009730688,0.36700186,0.0022231871,0.00028271863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028173238,0.00003080768,0.50326836,0.000025170713,0.000020521235,0.0000010063574,0.3055379,0.000036798945,0.000012752164,0.0021579852,0.18843526,0.00019170175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63717973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98119473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36484388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010862377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014570075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124898861","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.977519","title":"A Theory of Child Targeting","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"Subsidy; Economics; Cash transfers; Budget constraint; Welfare; Public economics; Maximization; Microeconomics; Poverty; Cash; Constraint (computer-aided design); Commodity; Paternalism; Macroeconomics; Economic growth; Finance","score_opus":0.007257474129627395,"score_gpt":0.25590658998321647,"score_spread":0.24864911585358906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124898861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8357672,0.0057654823,0.06469409,0.00071134703,0.00056492153,0.00011573737,0.0000015984529,0.00004103933,0.0923386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994098,0.0037427607,0.00015335312,0.00014351674,0.00054623594,3.318275e-7,9.147335e-7,0.000011155242,0.0013037153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972361,0.00015549234,0.00025812804,0.00010168457,0.00034065527,0.0019079909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944735,0.00010020992,0.00016618166,0.000075675045,0.000118090036,0.00009252726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010158521,0.00007973038,0.0001220772,0.00009212206,0.00054218655,0.000022924201,0.00027872814,0.00008524226,0.000035916066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002282479,0.00007246468,0.00009939549,0.00026401173,0.00013703962,0.00011466898,0.00001734166,0.001007886,0.000007378919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022378455,0.00003734792,0.013573081,0.0000018813585,0.00004944322,0.0000017902898,0.0059562703,0.000009840019,0.00012710164,0.97084945,0.00004065077,0.009330787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040784306,0.00012684379,0.010389047,0.000017009763,0.000030203633,0.000038086877,0.185969,0.0000108648965,0.000047933187,0.7939459,0.008840054,0.00017721613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001688795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002996691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18001272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043532436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014605782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43788192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124917890","doi":"","title":"Work Incentives and 'In-Work' Benefit Reforms: A Review","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Poverty; Work (physics); Earned income tax credit; Labour economics; Economics; Single mothers; Demographic economics; Child poverty; Tax credit; Income Support; Public economics; Economic growth; Psychology","score_opus":0.024719588234078875,"score_gpt":0.31438741770555634,"score_spread":0.28966782947147746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124917890","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008592401,0.99459124,0.00003483448,0.00019942812,0.00034198837,0.0006282009,0.0000044197595,0.000028801724,0.0040851813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000585091,0.9956053,0.00004411294,0.00012905382,0.0005034779,0.000027176095,0.000013519582,0.00004946568,0.003569372],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946352,0.0004521933,0.00086094125,0.00043128038,0.00055928226,0.0030610894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986736,0.00013076255,0.0006183745,0.00025617806,0.00010888854,0.00021217036],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028686041,0.00044620188,0.0015359179,0.00025006526,0.0006400288,0.00009530542,0.0007000034,0.00040954593,0.00002342312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016311355,0.0003443304,0.00048245068,0.0014839446,0.0002478735,0.00023791005,0.00008736029,0.0037389526,0.000032704924],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050060944,0.00003999861,0.00051176734,0.0014493559,0.00015472597,0.000015939846,0.0007563384,2.299177e-7,1.3437047e-9,0.023031734,0.000169863,0.97386503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015274699,0.000039249273,0.00012731705,0.026136855,0.00022435108,0.00020355647,0.0013386568,9.7435155e-8,5.2330607e-10,0.014090003,0.9572713,0.00041590113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017067278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035534925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9734491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002882189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00688418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125016991","doi":"","title":"Stigma of Sexual Violence and Women's Decision to Work","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Stigma (botany); Work (physics); Sexual assault; Criminology; Opportunity cost; Deterrence (psychology); Demographic economics; Sexual violence; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Economics; Medicine; Engineering; Psychiatry; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.03402010536096581,"score_gpt":0.34790125606536715,"score_spread":0.31388115070440137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125016991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781733,0.00004104391,0.000009863374,0.00018120976,0.00018662322,0.0002311122,0.000009191315,0.000008874418,0.021158772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929345,0.005266339,0.0008056024,0.000048722504,0.000088609755,0.000025256431,6.450997e-7,0.000010931455,0.00081938953],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984542,0.000109615714,0.00023294312,0.0003638035,0.00025884857,0.00058055075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852324,0.00045556057,0.000080190905,0.0005598597,0.000097998294,0.00028317637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024252431,0.00008832153,0.00020100195,0.00015460468,0.0007177545,0.00015931416,0.00065531954,0.00012186668,0.00003473306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015959465,0.0000937707,0.000018267441,0.00011436772,0.0006621126,0.0001646251,0.0003215892,0.0002200791,0.000005914263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006853381,0.00003934588,0.3055102,0.00001017555,0.000008132194,0.000004704932,0.007890546,0.00016039876,0.000087064676,0.0010935863,0.000019554273,0.68510777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005594208,0.00021500296,0.9235149,0.00019899913,0.0000024539088,6.417957e-7,0.05911235,0.00034188136,0.000015948388,0.0066340826,0.009133537,0.0002707893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060329464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026863387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.684837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031006677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027693214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.552046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125037805","doi":"","title":"Welfare Policy, Language Group and the Duration of Lone Motherhood Spells","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Statistics Canada; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Duration (music); Welfare; Sample (material); Demographic economics; Economics; Social policy; Marital status; Labour economics; Public economics; Demography; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.017365884791093508,"score_gpt":0.3125255657348594,"score_spread":0.2951596809437659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125037805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69663423,0.0003604155,0.00001150485,0.0023357375,0.00019041807,0.00083036197,0.00009117365,0.000017224098,0.29952896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98510534,0.010215953,0.00027671782,0.000063190964,0.00042571087,0.00002292268,0.000042888794,0.000029846682,0.003817458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758077,0.0006531443,0.00048357836,0.0004435048,0.00032507718,0.0005139485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986703,0.00037891167,0.00022476805,0.0005436761,0.000086403365,0.0000959832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029730164,0.00017790106,0.0003888293,0.00028926058,0.00024518376,0.00014899786,0.0005614646,0.0003782568,0.000045557215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038937462,0.00015572581,0.000113729824,0.00018672486,0.0012214753,0.00007420743,0.00043730304,0.00073187303,0.0000042829065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049108226,0.00068029703,0.11726877,0.00078233425,0.00039054584,0.000043128635,0.14903487,0.0076565878,0.0003500311,0.49730235,0.00026855987,0.22573145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009180744,0.00028386945,0.49439746,0.0005438907,0.00010236305,0.000011611098,0.31853792,0.02593261,0.00009525937,0.10747284,0.041196045,0.002245393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025199816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026985183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38982952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004784213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047735407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125070370","doi":"","title":"Assortative Marriage and the Effects of Government Homecare Subsidy Programs on Gender Wage and Participation Inequality","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Economics; Inequality; Labour economics; Government (linguistics); Wage inequality; Wage; Affect (linguistics); Drop out; Gender inequality; Ex-ante; Demographic economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.0441373879122473,"score_gpt":0.3525476112004834,"score_spread":0.3084102232882361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125070370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97726053,0.00024838507,0.0000038155013,0.0002021705,0.00020361725,0.0016406311,0.00008577492,0.000012955349,0.020342097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863332,0.012641585,0.00010360937,0.000055331842,0.00011445764,0.00032383416,0.000026833091,0.000020029272,0.0003811408],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649644,0.0014374005,0.00043288228,0.00055212865,0.00057112623,0.0005100173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997358,0.0017314161,0.00024686317,0.00042017022,0.000092144604,0.00015137106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004148086,0.00020324525,0.0004358694,0.000073151496,0.00026650022,0.00013912072,0.00029502,0.00030657378,0.0000073057345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012273757,0.00016876085,0.00008002274,0.00009776875,0.0010519901,0.00007375564,0.00038557878,0.00076060777,6.270323e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004668661,0.000510366,0.4970609,0.00083500793,0.0003300744,0.000014244076,0.146116,0.0008082393,0.000041526033,0.033187136,0.000016441447,0.3206132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024503693,0.00025356258,0.93274087,0.00024021706,0.00005250407,3.0848747e-7,0.051375363,0.0034544303,0.000056904537,0.007932023,0.0009962523,0.00044722095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009703434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007856654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43567997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007065646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022370872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68818676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125089241","doi":"","title":"Who Marries Whom and Why","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Marriage market; Legalization; Spillover effect; Matching (statistics); Transferable utility; Economics; Econometrics; Function (biology); Nonparametric statistics; Demographic economics; Demography; Statistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Sociology; Biology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0063543259145166465,"score_gpt":0.23758840143821708,"score_spread":0.23123407552370043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125089241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96827316,0.005526781,0.003944256,0.0021803887,0.00027750744,0.000077392455,0.000002663056,0.000040938143,0.019676931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818527,0.007456877,0.00007855873,0.00022674528,0.00073032,0.0000013637242,0.0000016357977,0.000012571582,0.009639225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758816,0.000120793346,0.00016517406,0.0001384445,0.00029172646,0.0016956957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999636,0.00003802553,0.000080054495,0.00007660713,0.00008311259,0.000086212116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013121222,0.00010243811,0.00012873959,0.00006668082,0.0011238423,0.00026009223,0.00018410372,0.00009165691,0.000024316603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003883108,0.000094945746,0.000053858123,0.00017382255,0.00026786604,0.00023112397,0.00002062243,0.0007257034,0.000008357422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000077322475,0.000020220747,0.15044412,0.0000020893922,0.000025888492,0.0000026612622,0.0022385458,0.000010491246,0.000041454878,0.84382576,0.0008675381,0.0025135078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037920187,0.000087439796,0.06500976,0.000008574172,0.000024387693,0.000053633088,0.029912924,0.000040558123,0.0000031679808,0.83519953,0.06908311,0.00019771952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030457648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058678012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08543436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039943596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019092475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95849866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125094986","doi":"","title":"A quantitative theory of the gender gap in wages","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; National Longitudinal Surveys; Human capital; Labour economics; Wage; Panel data; Incentive; Demographic economics; Population; Econometrics; Demography","score_opus":0.09417528672986099,"score_gpt":0.3781784270567878,"score_spread":0.2840031403269268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125094986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7127315,0.00038206263,0.000006238856,0.00037685083,0.0004298964,0.00069103204,0.000054382166,0.000014114622,0.28531396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97858137,0.017407434,0.00057465496,0.00009258057,0.00015402195,0.00008992162,0.000007877413,0.000033824374,0.0030583146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567693,0.0018741561,0.0005966891,0.0006187556,0.00045192832,0.0007815543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973978,0.001309046,0.00023126959,0.0007798935,0.00016977715,0.00011224359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006476374,0.00021889953,0.00045048515,0.0003929795,0.00024437954,0.00008087472,0.0013368331,0.00050944637,0.00009052118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013561562,0.00019525926,0.00020054559,0.0003150031,0.0013582646,0.000095235155,0.0009047887,0.0016336399,0.000006195443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022008545,0.0005723625,0.2677757,0.0002931316,0.00021946209,0.000019361052,0.17419064,0.03328635,0.00012741762,0.44858226,0.00009525816,0.074617915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097654713,0.00008424962,0.48525113,0.00038382562,0.0000216668,0.0000012861713,0.28214818,0.005481865,0.000034746994,0.21505524,0.009727916,0.000833371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010582979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01710116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28225565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010805005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018677232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9542848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125117121","doi":"","title":"The External Effects of Black-Male Incarceration on Black Females","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Black male; Prison; Odds; Black women; Demography; Educational attainment; Black female; Fertility; Psychology; Demographic economics; Logistic regression; Medicine; Political science; Criminology; Population; Sociology; Economics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.030551368972323627,"score_gpt":0.3283752146506225,"score_spread":0.2978238456782989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125117121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7927076,0.00012940928,0.000019466654,0.00022490096,0.00045614204,0.0008391442,0.000020962887,0.000019367464,0.20558296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722963,0.016589923,0.00017717388,0.00004239688,0.00054801453,0.0000826683,0.000024469336,0.000037235135,0.010201838],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651104,0.0009456734,0.000571315,0.00060860964,0.0005953025,0.0007680604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967151,0.001921125,0.00026800574,0.00074860634,0.00020918818,0.00013793474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029561545,0.0002443857,0.00038614616,0.00025567855,0.00055102305,0.0002707161,0.0009760273,0.0004924943,0.000016257884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000662,0.00022291066,0.00018913283,0.00015545182,0.0017223293,0.00007917637,0.00046979095,0.0012165442,0.000016640994],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004707097,0.0011492922,0.3765868,0.0014940717,0.00034836456,0.000113161754,0.04589063,0.13234434,0.0008529296,0.07529931,0.0013721372,0.36407828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022147556,0.00062987115,0.8210879,0.0014983895,0.000057186335,0.0000028906784,0.026534999,0.07051013,0.0005507131,0.04634174,0.028876845,0.0016945815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017308383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009986354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4445011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009745367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009714167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9090033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125153352","doi":"","title":"Family Proximity, Childcare, and Women's Labor Force Attachment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Labour economics; Parental leave; Public health insurance; Business; Economics; Demography; Economic growth; Sociology; Health insurance; Population","score_opus":0.03829449939300762,"score_gpt":0.31439817379786156,"score_spread":0.27610367440485395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125153352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78024226,0.00008938028,0.0000019924591,0.0001357906,0.00016783303,0.00043356206,0.000015837737,0.000056375375,0.21885698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854831,0.009689507,0.0005031529,0.00031734502,0.00012757584,0.00013105744,0.0000042598695,0.000037065212,0.0037069286],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997592,0.000272541,0.0002993323,0.00050617283,0.00029768882,0.0010322686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893415,0.00017000712,0.00006524873,0.00036832868,0.00011422162,0.0003480144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019088007,0.00015881672,0.00024641672,0.00021494749,0.00041405126,0.000105538245,0.0004456671,0.0001878266,0.000060561768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020966215,0.00016895615,0.000045934186,0.0002490596,0.00064661604,0.0002774668,0.00023656775,0.0004085961,0.0000074304194],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008747072,0.00030788506,0.79069257,0.00005118048,0.00006764477,0.000024816805,0.07523918,0.000028954179,0.000102054684,0.038779564,0.00006635257,0.094552316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089047535,0.00023266554,0.8324886,0.000030417885,0.0000050185577,0.000002148457,0.11004832,0.000402548,0.00001759321,0.010095507,0.045352902,0.00043380546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094669056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023336818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21515006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006971888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004224134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68898314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125154366","doi":"10.20381/ruor-25536","title":"Opting or Not Opting to Share Income Tax Information with the Census: Does it Affect Research Findings?","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Affect (linguistics); Census; Economics; Wage; Distribution (mathematics); Income tax; Economic inequality; Income distribution; Demographic economics; Public economics; Actuarial science; Inequality; Labour economics; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Law; Population","score_opus":0.10158573203502533,"score_gpt":0.3570863402043926,"score_spread":0.25550060816936726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125154366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.928653,0.000021789558,0.00071132864,0.029039253,0.00035025898,0.002795918,0.0006458016,0.0000647668,0.037717886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9461978,0.00056672824,0.008174536,0.0001245439,0.00030996065,0.00001938755,0.00013713504,0.00003958557,0.04443031],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895079,0.0027367284,0.00041558943,0.0008119946,0.004515757,0.002012026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906962,0.003137871,0.00035309023,0.000986096,0.004155426,0.00067129993],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015112966,0.0003954085,0.0006040167,0.0013038298,0.0056711575,0.00072818116,0.003854764,0.00067706907,0.0009969781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022310428,0.00029738276,0.00020539791,0.0038862028,0.0027058942,0.0016637536,0.0039870804,0.0034657302,0.0006534467],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004564547,0.00039186413,0.11548738,0.0035665245,0.00076789135,0.0002126394,0.5962412,0.0078634955,0.0004233723,0.20269671,0.05207038,0.019822124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076176523,0.0006860689,0.15564148,0.0012535021,0.000044412747,0.000004135834,0.655952,0.006147708,0.00003070355,0.00036963486,0.17849748,0.00061115576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021869868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043567147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20232707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014884523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001521599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125175413","doi":"10.3138/cpp.38.4.471","title":"Income Replacement Rates among Canadian Seniors: The Effect of Widowhood and Divorce","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.010740331252067572,"score_gpt":0.259659485838859,"score_spread":0.24891915458679142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125175413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92133766,0.0045859306,0.0000028516297,0.034488615,0.0016918932,0.00060027995,0.00042590068,0.000017494442,0.03684938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880218,0.0003031244,0.000012740254,0.0017140857,0.001387541,0.000031067175,0.000030650284,0.00003448757,0.008464511],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960709,0.0007677737,0.00035138865,0.00030216965,0.00032212673,0.0021855936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99475366,0.0002594111,0.00016065825,0.00051686796,0.000119111915,0.0041902843],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020214973,0.00032006454,0.0003609642,0.00064264337,0.0011576514,0.00024053676,0.00057111715,0.00035309032,0.00020816324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071230996,0.00027350528,0.00010490582,0.0015950114,0.0015514424,0.00063443976,0.0000696603,0.00033119108,0.00004752933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018081446,0.0000075436756,0.877443,0.000045511344,0.00008207033,0.0000032433788,0.0111953365,0.0000017674207,0.0000013857561,0.10100562,0.005978837,0.00423388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000356648,0.00012669251,0.72229755,0.000038725684,0.00006943802,0.0000100001125,0.0051077493,0.00012617998,0.0000068217173,0.00042656827,0.27109283,0.00034083505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99751025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99816895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26511398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020800293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077592237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125220839","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3075158","title":"Long-Term Care Insurance: Knowledge Barriers, Risk Perception and Adverse Selection","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université Laval; HEC Montréal","funders":"HEC Montréal; KU Leuven","keywords":"Adverse selection; Actuarial science; Product (mathematics); Bequest; Business; Population; Long-term care insurance; Public economics; Term (time); Group insurance; Limiting; Economics; Insurance policy; Long-term care; General insurance; Income protection insurance; Medicine","score_opus":0.008254385537879529,"score_gpt":0.28350338977798867,"score_spread":0.2752490042401091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125220839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906237,0.0029054913,0.00102749,0.00010455009,0.00064641837,0.00014295502,0.0000076192473,0.000037992137,0.0045037847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9536446,0.043977693,0.000031187144,0.000015685506,0.0007866536,0.000003515934,0.0000032853065,0.000016105092,0.0015213195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977338,0.00023131084,0.00017090702,0.00022845514,0.00025402973,0.0013815387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909,0.000019557056,0.0002467393,0.0001643114,0.0002718391,0.00020755097],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013344426,0.00014219408,0.00014888257,0.00008364643,0.0047468226,0.00027030107,0.00032488952,0.00017218677,0.000035846315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022458105,0.00013967005,0.000089177345,0.00009331979,0.00025288688,0.0007011492,0.00003801315,0.0013003817,0.000020244168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020256908,0.000013470438,0.94725686,0.00000777477,0.000045006873,0.0000010488785,0.018403811,0.0000060888897,0.00006490052,0.0060168686,0.00002045869,0.028143443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006229968,0.00012362293,0.9271944,0.000019126133,0.00004981377,0.0000327613,0.062801376,0.000048553033,0.0000015783527,0.008349764,0.00057504425,0.00018092143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011466856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073886506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07273982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013599575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025634703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125225519","doi":"10.1111/caje.12326","title":"Income instability and fiscal progression","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Cummings Foundation","keywords":"Personal income tax; Humanities; Economics; Welfare economics; Political science; Gross income; Public economics; Art; Tax reform; State income tax","score_opus":0.08808479494714667,"score_gpt":0.22904948190326957,"score_spread":0.1409646869561229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125225519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907672,0.00016562422,0.000034914534,0.0017264425,0.0017460835,0.00019968387,0.000067407156,0.000007530632,0.005285149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975828,0.00014292654,0.0006425378,0.00031379328,0.001043282,0.0000041901512,0.000003420174,0.000022689415,0.00024435442],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983237,0.00013057458,0.0005533276,0.00027408532,0.000004445201,0.00071388343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967006,0.000106264015,0.00035127092,0.00024018208,0.00034009936,0.0022615895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001306785,0.00017674599,0.00037300814,0.00035163428,0.00060717197,0.00017584783,0.00042772584,0.00022907261,0.00017900599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043666176,0.00020161524,0.0000889638,0.00016611302,0.0010106306,0.00046892575,0.000024354153,0.00027124828,0.000010611363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003443458,0.00001130021,0.59342617,0.00002052613,0.000051080457,0.000043831,0.017532002,0.000031223695,0.0000057154725,0.381499,0.00018125372,0.0071634785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014884638,0.0011615931,0.4104305,0.00021277956,0.000078365585,0.00027173638,0.019070916,0.0013479425,0.00003481143,0.43218222,0.13265413,0.0010665458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24963301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7469789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016131958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038003812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82216305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125265242","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4932.2011.00776.x","title":"Bargaining Over Labour: Do Patients Have Any Power?*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Record","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Bargaining power; Preference; Exploit; Power (physics); Variation (astronomy); Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Demography; Microeconomics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.024356836388996866,"score_gpt":0.2537501380416577,"score_spread":0.22939330165266084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125265242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65525657,0.000022872573,0.000021044154,0.000014397162,0.0014397869,0.00010414831,0.000019422452,0.000041481868,0.34308028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951258,0.00013313658,0.00070213334,0.00032570495,0.00021839976,0.00000795432,0.0000058012974,0.000021726652,0.0034593518],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998827,0.00008100214,0.00027137867,0.0003109547,0.0000896458,0.0004200544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936044,0.000046138808,0.00014349134,0.0002406811,0.00004170546,0.00016756443],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003860011,0.00013150039,0.00018294739,0.00006984325,0.00026999484,0.00007921453,0.00030712734,0.00012978284,0.002767178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038464957,0.0001446093,0.000082956794,0.000051165127,0.00010930808,0.00030379262,0.000058083726,0.000117007745,0.00063833717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001023364,0.00003484438,0.9442184,0.0000012584331,0.000019837495,0.0000013147395,0.021867322,0.0000017450709,0.0000012064407,0.028121099,0.0018792264,0.0038434854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045635752,0.00007632396,0.90640795,0.0000076167853,0.000008034369,1.4713827e-7,0.0111983605,0.000045595658,0.0000035736155,0.01647757,0.06503345,0.00028499556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007645204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004512245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3398692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024294826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014848488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125266637","doi":"","title":"Paying People to Be Healthy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Information System of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences (Ardabil University of Medical Sciences)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Unintended consequences; Paternalism; Psychological intervention; Legitimacy; Public economics; Promotion (chess); Business; Public relations; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Psychology; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.0901510370386612,"score_gpt":0.34325050271184593,"score_spread":0.25309946567318475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125266637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86433566,0.000033072676,0.00915002,0.08593599,0.0003891017,0.00086592993,0.0000332951,0.00007409426,0.03918287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99730396,0.00038317454,0.001769898,0.00028680675,0.00004744676,4.6123e-7,0.0000043679242,0.0000033652839,0.0002005077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98225594,0.001233677,0.0006483375,0.00046100662,0.014315149,0.0010859047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946495,0.0012595338,0.0004928317,0.0003493027,0.0011848749,0.0020639007],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02839593,0.0001743675,0.0006004111,0.00096685806,0.0026474975,0.00009853913,0.005296662,0.00049204304,0.0028610702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029856174,0.00016671671,0.0002010627,0.0047895787,0.008771002,0.0020121902,0.0011000658,0.00055970455,0.0002007735],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031934542,0.00074593094,0.15160458,0.00207738,0.00013488591,0.000049710932,0.25644794,0.0010293302,0.000052289597,0.49640256,0.048940912,0.042195145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020971068,0.0010213368,0.02191994,0.00047735393,0.000019272238,0.000008663501,0.9109764,0.01542544,0.000008479557,0.00045420552,0.047246657,0.00034515155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.084653094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009804973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65452844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005512018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068032946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125295878","doi":"10.1920/wp.ifs.2004.0414","title":"Breaking the cycle? The effect of education on welfare receipt among children of welfare recipients","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Welfare; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.009608817508947992,"score_gpt":0.2940397752392994,"score_spread":0.28443095773035143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125295878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42802066,0.00029613147,0.00000676722,0.001781911,0.004977565,0.0011575375,0.00012919548,0.000017830884,0.5636124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94772375,0.00056634407,0.00001015387,0.00006209992,0.0005852314,0.00005476061,0.00017545267,0.000033649812,0.050788533],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717903,0.00084125326,0.00041562002,0.00040146554,0.0007882297,0.0003744099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973213,0.0002586357,0.0009812206,0.0011095603,0.00025357158,0.000075698525],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001384717,0.00032279288,0.0004976232,0.000114924565,0.0019784865,0.00013721122,0.0017738976,0.00047715864,0.0007136847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032900597,0.00017458528,0.00027528475,0.0002595514,0.00074405863,0.0001206325,0.00013978849,0.0004930026,0.00010261191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021985073,0.0004889812,0.5440817,0.00045537882,0.0010474322,7.4228024e-7,0.03880686,0.00066124235,0.000013438674,0.030420061,0.21186642,0.17193791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028234994,0.00019487785,0.92466134,0.0003815743,0.00017276335,6.821099e-7,0.006060394,0.000015338519,0.000035930858,0.00010482598,0.06776429,0.00032566182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027648568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042258464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51970315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013858423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027920396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125388243","doi":"","title":"An Econometric Analysis of the Impact of the Self-Sufficiency Project on the Employment Behaviour of Former Welfare Recipients","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Human Resources and Skills Development Canada; Michigan Diabetes Research Center, University of Michigan; Sugar Research and Development Corporation","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Economics; Econometric model; Raw data; Work (physics); Baseline (sea); Demographic economics; Estimation; Percentage point; Labour economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.04368657873860106,"score_gpt":0.36365941028754184,"score_spread":0.3199728315489408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125388243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9536435,0.000032316068,7.3571766e-7,0.00017791877,0.00026130746,0.0014662232,0.00050738506,0.000009409334,0.04390123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998334,0.0010905421,0.00004198328,0.000012013605,0.00004346638,0.00008509913,0.000025416191,0.000025569207,0.00034194527],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589527,0.0011418365,0.000948937,0.0006112931,0.0007368453,0.0006658374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963748,0.00048319253,0.0008755877,0.0018316885,0.00035030834,0.00008441453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043383185,0.00026985718,0.0006770291,0.0011597454,0.0005002819,0.00007672682,0.0026244896,0.0003552764,0.00006101406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043773514,0.00015482467,0.00096198963,0.002584099,0.00082302844,0.000081842256,0.0006927058,0.00090258237,3.9290438e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024986233,0.00085671153,0.9532823,0.000024219766,0.00050750375,2.784852e-7,0.007043636,0.0326006,0.0000089320965,0.0019741347,0.000022632834,0.0036540935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015813137,0.0001606814,0.98622686,0.000041786254,0.00014432854,1.151763e-7,0.0075637377,0.0051351045,0.000016277472,0.00024045113,0.00014826396,0.00016424112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021396928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011368609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044690493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017128079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001908512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125431006","doi":"10.1920/wp.ifs.1998.9820","title":"Collective labour supply: heterogeneity and non-participation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; Economic and Social Research Council; Concordia University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Labour supply; Labour economics; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.034682824485439495,"score_gpt":0.34167007323175863,"score_spread":0.3069872487463191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125431006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3747462,0.00038606283,0.00071677123,0.00026782393,0.0025024312,0.0005451776,0.00029542766,0.000031967076,0.62050813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48063385,0.0015305469,0.00023565708,0.00019450343,0.0004664963,0.000041845145,0.00007042441,0.000017185163,0.51680946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852186,0.00013823246,0.00018596655,0.00040900297,0.000318932,0.000425997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989885,0.00007481988,0.00019121722,0.00030398642,0.0002506887,0.00019080608],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003760671,0.00021667605,0.00034890763,0.00006657562,0.0014213212,0.00036841296,0.00029831805,0.0004734916,0.0007261905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083414314,0.00020906133,0.00008787603,0.00012375803,0.00032709382,0.00017071223,0.00008996116,0.00020710108,0.0007228517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005843151,0.00026749243,0.12535664,0.00023698268,0.00048410392,0.000009309003,0.082437985,0.000080232356,0.00015107384,0.0063815196,0.78238404,0.0021522178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083995616,0.00013949424,0.36345667,0.00007430313,0.00012979201,8.3494376e-7,0.0065768096,0.00053437,0.0001278071,0.0015048167,0.62562275,0.0009924087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009563374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033811845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23810004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027357318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013383031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125461096","doi":"","title":"Marital Property Laws and Women’s Labour Supply","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Poverty; Distribution (mathematics); Labour supply; Economics; Labour economics; Property (philosophy); Civil code; Demographic economics; Law; Political science; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.030641096457853758,"score_gpt":0.3130196016372953,"score_spread":0.2823785051794416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125461096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8225063,0.000109115856,7.834036e-7,0.0006787277,0.000696242,0.0007491961,0.00015176323,0.0000535494,0.17505431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9413295,0.023398796,0.00060548197,0.00020849978,0.00084471476,0.00032634547,0.000038135142,0.000064165964,0.03318436],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99604386,0.0006015785,0.00047952108,0.0010217404,0.00044770027,0.0014055816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981305,0.0002881523,0.00013085242,0.0007212034,0.00026860804,0.00046067714],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041799443,0.0003043677,0.0005053562,0.0003348555,0.00061726745,0.00050027116,0.00091801037,0.00073087675,0.00028377466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006797304,0.000276466,0.000092167116,0.000171322,0.0015656892,0.00017425281,0.0014156469,0.0014408024,0.000027727103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002582706,0.00072054163,0.6581749,0.0006799391,0.00030665981,0.00011578181,0.10142758,0.0002997346,0.00006889248,0.018692227,0.0014185538,0.21783696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016506003,0.00034603156,0.24009311,0.00027132934,0.000014644696,0.000008354025,0.09709018,0.0027248282,0.0000090164995,0.03602695,0.62016267,0.001602314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033551943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011719937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6187441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019333721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001835275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125462267","doi":"10.3886/e127501","title":"Great Depression and the rise of female employment: A new hypothesis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cohort; Depression (economics); Census; Crash; Great Depression; Demographic economics; Cohort effect; Economics; Work (physics); Labour economics; Demography; Medicine; Political science; Sociology; Population; Engineering; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.06382657666931914,"score_gpt":0.32945620885509547,"score_spread":0.26562963218577634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125462267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86127377,0.0010269831,0.000011271157,0.002140829,0.00030129016,0.0011867742,0.000054510627,0.000035226734,0.13396937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9368271,0.058780216,0.00073995517,0.000096762844,0.0003096666,0.00008396965,0.0000059390954,0.000040859137,0.0031155301],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971479,0.0008040558,0.00046569467,0.00065538636,0.0003891919,0.00053774595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976039,0.0011985146,0.00020244028,0.000624314,0.00008672397,0.00028413744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002311777,0.00020917466,0.00052717613,0.00017550217,0.0003401691,0.00015278393,0.0008434558,0.00037322802,0.00007584098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011706621,0.00017398923,0.00016238101,0.00016821512,0.001218393,0.000073036244,0.0010497066,0.00089831394,0.0000043138793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075513177,0.00016497615,0.39644644,0.00032886583,0.00032009857,0.000029514102,0.08686406,0.0022795112,0.00007680295,0.010403369,0.00033932462,0.5019919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011517467,0.00031566716,0.47422132,0.0012101656,0.00026189498,0.000008743701,0.13435826,0.02441874,0.00020877362,0.19550031,0.15546751,0.0025111567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004594098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040294505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49948075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031059963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010635674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70950747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125517169","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1278934","title":"The Changing Intra-Household Resource Allocation in Russia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Earnings; Economics; Wage; Labour economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.015685440833690816,"score_gpt":0.2455732779694287,"score_spread":0.2298878371357379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125517169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823425,0.0030883614,0.002985608,0.0038603917,0.0002901455,0.0001379167,4.4864527e-7,0.000048110087,0.0072465315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764368,0.019933976,0.000024594709,0.00018678883,0.00047725107,0.00000399642,0.0000010539811,0.000014949438,0.0029205712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969367,0.00023202071,0.0002151515,0.00012747891,0.00036607735,0.002122582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995785,0.00008232275,0.000103873936,0.00012197058,0.00004077269,0.00007259935],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033925017,0.00009085376,0.00009398323,0.00012559902,0.0018128292,0.00007073747,0.00037273686,0.000084040126,0.000003174223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010269141,0.000071168324,0.00005611698,0.00054192555,0.00015764072,0.00015128317,0.000021190765,0.0011610703,0.00000836917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031493528,0.00006249439,0.0364208,0.0000018009334,0.000047774363,0.0000123228265,0.048920397,0.00065592426,0.0000811611,0.899694,0.0003247625,0.013747072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016108287,0.00024729746,0.06556796,0.00005099043,0.000036268953,0.00039996978,0.49606034,0.0015439314,0.000022055985,0.32046682,0.11328952,0.0007040366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046776887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01575239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5792272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010946826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021270276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125539648","doi":"","title":"The Timing of Teenage Births and the Signaling Value of a High School Degree","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Earnings; Value (mathematics); Fertility; Population; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Causality (physics); Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Demography; Sociology; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.044655783644318665,"score_gpt":0.32247820589167653,"score_spread":0.27782242224735787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125539648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8948329,0.00081014197,0.000036308596,0.0010924789,0.00039315177,0.0009436785,0.000058152444,0.000015722128,0.10181743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96026784,0.037606213,0.0003519632,0.00002892333,0.00020279572,0.00006344153,0.0000023817474,0.000026571352,0.0014498712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681914,0.0010436988,0.000638067,0.0004497685,0.00043323392,0.0006161064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491096,0.003621718,0.00036140785,0.0007412756,0.00022786489,0.00013675774],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008264733,0.00018196994,0.00046923163,0.00018790312,0.00060887175,0.00013345906,0.0011415875,0.00032169378,0.000022706063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020850517,0.00011169321,0.00015343042,0.00014689233,0.0027562298,0.00007206688,0.0009403351,0.0008896517,0.0000016920994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008530859,0.00019472987,0.08876879,0.00069092656,0.0008465298,0.000015889245,0.042469285,0.008649644,0.0007450692,0.5502968,0.00013567135,0.3063336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0089929085,0.00032641488,0.15298794,0.002899816,0.0001864083,0.0000070965984,0.21479395,0.030702436,0.0005942447,0.5649881,0.02144304,0.0020776705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025618556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017112142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30425593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003396127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012119287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125574479","doi":"","title":"Incorporating Nonmarket Time Into Benefit-Cost Analyses of Social Programs: An Application to the Self-Sufficiency Project","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Earnings; Incentive; Welfare; Labour economics; Poverty; Social Welfare; Business; Wage; Nonmarket forces; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Economics; Finance; Economic growth; Accounting","score_opus":0.055220102823939965,"score_gpt":0.3948365096557056,"score_spread":0.33961640683176564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125574479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87531424,0.000040250805,0.00015585996,0.0004496183,0.00020927787,0.004437597,0.000067303576,0.00010871601,0.119217165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924468,0.00074157707,0.004717108,0.000073213116,0.00063887716,0.0006869128,0.00020363735,0.00005434251,0.00043752888],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99587697,0.00070866226,0.00085625605,0.000947031,0.0007260218,0.00088503864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975823,0.0003761914,0.00047579448,0.00082687347,0.0005414515,0.00019735115],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009256531,0.00029154742,0.00051247975,0.00062069047,0.00095174904,0.0002847015,0.0016679206,0.0005073403,0.000010761986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042926162,0.00027309358,0.00017896618,0.0010369325,0.0006244544,0.00015655464,0.00079804927,0.0010626167,0.00001026664],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001631852,0.0014344044,0.037462313,0.00029440696,0.00022009177,0.000005965937,0.11670814,0.010164529,0.00049385545,0.010496861,0.000071742455,0.8224845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018815652,0.0014014022,0.20515919,0.00049016747,0.00025161196,0.0000050440567,0.36969343,0.2864438,0.00014271155,0.018985542,0.111391574,0.0041539758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055886772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031769134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8183305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013896521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022988967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125582706","doi":"","title":"All in the Family: A Simultaneous Model of Parenting Style and Child Conduct","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Simultaneity; Psychology; Style (visual arts); Developmental psychology; Parenting styles; Perception; National Longitudinal Surveys; Principal (computer security); Social psychology; Parenting skills; Demographic economics; Economics; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.08609201518202493,"score_gpt":0.35907950142070566,"score_spread":0.27298748623868074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125582706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87789893,0.00041814745,0.000004757658,0.0004560447,0.000121543526,0.0007009371,0.00007563963,0.000015680867,0.12030831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966407,0.03212715,0.0006380116,0.00020854514,0.00015823702,0.000058939924,0.000024232795,0.000028277853,0.00034961602],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969317,0.00060938613,0.0005967696,0.0006503646,0.00041418214,0.0007976393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978815,0.0010915629,0.00019634227,0.0005924017,0.00011601763,0.0001222201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004053017,0.00022802938,0.00045925952,0.0003036489,0.00026392506,0.00015950623,0.0009677944,0.00043684317,0.000008416683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082012295,0.00021463344,0.00010489334,0.00016085069,0.0007183327,0.00009321114,0.0006004104,0.0015528869,0.0000012724964],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078757745,0.00050569256,0.0441649,0.00033965832,0.00013662514,0.00004191934,0.14927585,0.70027924,0.00013173539,0.008262566,0.00004617979,0.09673685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000932272,0.00007144863,0.010589216,0.00032152838,0.000022553875,0.0000034975394,0.15266158,0.8192025,0.000005200221,0.006227039,0.009288326,0.00067485723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026638946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0134781385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11995869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004456216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077314564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8752498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125589405","doi":"10.1257/aer.102.5.1927","title":"The Impact of Family Income on Child Achievement: Evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":817,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Adjusted gross income; Disadvantaged; Earned income tax credit; Instrumental variable; Income tax; Family income; Gross income; Test (biology); Demographic economics; Econometrics; Labour economics; Tax credit; State income tax; Tax reform; Public economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03700051456106048,"score_gpt":0.33644151668019795,"score_spread":0.2994410021191375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125589405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90032464,0.082713835,0.000017697263,0.0036939273,0.0004912238,0.0007149296,0.0000918177,0.000027570342,0.01192437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7242304,0.2740917,0.00003651522,0.0011601187,0.0003508802,0.000029484505,0.0000044490525,0.000013254686,0.00008321769],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785244,0.0006747503,0.0005305818,0.00023829709,0.00020833276,0.00049557496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997107,0.001265747,0.00068579847,0.0007339865,0.000036508765,0.00017091971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002203153,0.00020132097,0.0005146892,0.000023846243,0.0005306061,0.000060115446,0.0010235318,0.00003705712,0.00009630931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003821722,0.000113454385,0.00030799868,0.00026294723,0.00085109763,0.00027310153,0.000116447525,0.00022075672,0.00027519217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025928955,0.000071384544,0.9238541,0.000055321776,0.00025983524,3.4042225e-7,0.004104298,0.00005742343,0.000009881381,0.005101572,0.00483356,0.061626364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082716244,0.000116664305,0.9503061,0.0007058806,0.000055742985,3.526884e-7,0.0020059815,0.000020390495,6.104928e-7,0.00020884177,0.04632769,0.00016898145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033301044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009919427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19137786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035336002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024239215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9731363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125597567","doi":"","title":"New Estimates of Public Employment and Training Program Net Impacts: A Nonexperimental Evaluation of the Workforce Investment Act Program","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Minds at UW (University of Wisconsin)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Workforce; Liberian dollar; Propensity score matching; Demographic economics; Business; Investment (military); Quarter (Canadian coin); Matching (statistics); Training (meteorology); Labour economics; Economics; Finance; Economic growth; Medicine; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.09847258892545449,"score_gpt":0.33659814407604255,"score_spread":0.23812555515058806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125597567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915197,0.0011505099,0.00011173771,0.00072653056,0.00015318386,0.0020039007,0.000039810013,0.000043160373,0.004251475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771147,0.00017878186,0.022395922,0.000027349315,0.000029788524,0.0000040023056,0.000058088866,0.000010875553,0.00018052233],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977871,0.0003122381,0.00026724627,0.00036024654,0.0009173522,0.00035580312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846417,0.00005574734,0.0006350642,0.00035439263,0.00027921982,0.00021143402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001068028,0.00022959878,0.00044357846,0.00014683571,0.00032610865,0.000059529928,0.00046935037,0.00027523507,0.000059069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000780857,0.00022817684,0.00019224267,0.00032993098,0.0009333794,0.00019368624,0.00046867976,0.00019750523,4.5541913e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006974219,0.00090301415,0.05751534,0.00012802673,0.0004507701,0.000003194759,0.25805837,0.00036440548,0.00065974944,0.0031749357,0.0005681607,0.6781043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005288174,0.0018079643,0.5858942,0.0016368544,0.0020516573,0.000010435603,0.36756077,0.018708799,0.0006586255,0.010762317,0.00434509,0.0012751179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004314212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058644945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67682916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046663664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019094977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93047816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125624626","doi":"","title":"For Better For Worse: The Long-Term Effects of Postwar Reconstruction on Family Formation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; World War II; Term (time); First world war; Cohort; Differential (mechanical device); Population; Economics; Mobilization; Political science; Demography; Sociology; History; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.009064196292347828,"score_gpt":0.2536331778399021,"score_spread":0.24456898154755424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125624626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94014734,0.0005187325,0.055954907,0.0012982289,0.00075165095,0.0010024193,0.0000034913344,0.000015911986,0.00030733933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996903,0.0014905141,0.00027658016,0.00032810666,0.000500166,0.0000743824,0.000005788096,0.000013591622,0.0004078874],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982864,0.000105240826,0.00023842606,0.00010531377,0.00021163854,0.00105293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991152,0.0002705829,0.00022614819,0.00010118072,0.0002391415,0.000047718884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011425583,0.000099346216,0.00012839283,0.00007393145,0.00059935113,0.000073394425,0.00022123937,0.0000972538,0.0000048828983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012336607,0.00007126728,0.00014337317,0.00011607982,0.000088133354,0.00035601394,0.0000075179505,0.00039467908,0.00000670351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020079198,0.00017182715,0.02710642,0.00017331867,0.00035545634,3.6791639e-7,0.010510067,0.000059511494,0.00591623,0.2582664,0.0017730762,0.6954666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003569964,0.0022487887,0.1280469,0.00018648831,0.00023040708,0.000071266484,0.032995965,0.0010626141,0.00096994924,0.82862806,0.0014661291,0.00052345986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012810234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008471034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6949431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004326132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056132855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4609785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125659901","doi":"","title":"Household Responses to Individual Shocks: Disability, Labour Supply","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Human capital; Odds; British Household Panel Survey; Labour supply; Linkage (software); Work (physics); Labour economics; Exploit; Capital (architecture); Demographic economics; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.03638960026128959,"score_gpt":0.30600519045978103,"score_spread":0.26961559019849146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125659901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97544247,0.000008521471,0.000092534116,0.0040681385,0.0010025144,0.0002805296,0.0001949422,0.00024189228,0.018668467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98355025,0.000015535932,0.0023240321,0.001863388,0.00043082307,0.000018174227,0.0000071234776,0.00001715533,0.011773495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826616,0.00016570804,0.00019669198,0.00032261646,0.00055139937,0.000497427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887717,0.00028753708,0.000030604966,0.00037742517,0.00008431213,0.0003429365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011950918,0.00013274698,0.00015014561,0.000060165105,0.00046817656,0.00021914468,0.00060046866,0.00018308635,0.0007037294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006364392,0.0001199736,0.000065609645,0.00044487047,0.0003766884,0.0001874276,0.00015228396,0.00026004133,0.00011614579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014889976,0.000092790426,0.91680956,0.000002906317,0.000007785882,0.0000018742646,0.008708535,0.0000034939574,0.0004091895,0.07031604,0.0030581488,0.00057478034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013572688,0.00003842866,0.93414766,0.0000020224152,0.000008284858,6.636554e-7,0.0128722275,0.0000033054719,0.000043205753,0.002898031,0.049660057,0.00019038397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059584156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058014017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06741801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047681908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023820308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95917475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125668428","doi":"","title":"Household Time Allocation and Modes of Behavior: A Theory of Sorts","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Economics; Bargaining problem; Nash equilibrium; Time allocation; Microeconomics; Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Population; Production (economics); Class (philosophy); Marriage market; Simple (philosophy); Econometrics; Best response; Mathematical economics; Labour economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04639222756301242,"score_gpt":0.32408867923526763,"score_spread":0.2776964516722552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125668428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9379567,0.0002903404,0.000007095521,0.00006509761,0.00008544171,0.0005693396,0.00010001497,0.000019206516,0.06090677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756854,0.021880295,0.0005740575,0.000014163071,0.00009948944,0.00006791458,0.00002386071,0.00002852124,0.0016262622],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785846,0.00044939946,0.00050970394,0.00045546086,0.00030879243,0.0004181632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859005,0.00038350857,0.00023599085,0.0005129126,0.00015478626,0.00012272193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032657152,0.000160013,0.0004126198,0.00032737906,0.00012502838,0.000045209326,0.00047001019,0.00044189778,0.000038296082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024125422,0.00018368351,0.00009751745,0.00010475224,0.0009675993,0.00009559541,0.00041201303,0.0005612346,0.0000010921761],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024055723,0.0013248275,0.27462602,0.00062436826,0.0002791084,0.000014745553,0.05324196,0.036078498,0.0043222927,0.06709197,0.00005421389,0.5621014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029687237,0.0005264706,0.74157083,0.0013669797,0.00026624615,0.00000874854,0.107844576,0.036530208,0.0012552035,0.09876564,0.006178101,0.002718263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006415791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012656774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5593832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035902762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085240364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74903965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125677388","doi":"","title":"Female Employment in MENA’s Manufacturing Sector: The Implications of Firm-Related and National Factors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Logit; Production (economics); Demographic economics; Middle East; Manufacturing sector; Foreign ownership; Economics; Private sector; Business; Labour economics; Economic growth; Geography; Foreign direct investment; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.0782315725260495,"score_gpt":0.35689055084501853,"score_spread":0.278658978318969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125677388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9305159,0.00013956646,8.24432e-7,0.0005734109,0.00020325916,0.0006532662,0.00011610743,0.000015168371,0.06778251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99469036,0.004138986,0.00006049447,0.000023298942,0.000061564795,0.00009303862,0.000052297764,0.000020277002,0.00085969426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977824,0.00038710787,0.0004998733,0.00047152903,0.00038854763,0.00047051173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985409,0.0005850409,0.00017459378,0.00038876725,0.0001735468,0.00013716704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003049034,0.00016690389,0.00029132076,0.00032597175,0.00024981832,0.00008968464,0.00059421174,0.00033487714,0.00003783481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003570627,0.00015056672,0.00007080708,0.0001359715,0.0005345426,0.00008144268,0.00053956895,0.0008776022,0.0000015814845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029604005,0.00027586208,0.85807145,0.00011051971,0.0001801131,0.0000029613393,0.088359304,0.028078496,0.000058903937,0.013169488,0.0001316208,0.011531699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048153356,0.000034301935,0.91936773,0.00008240086,0.000008196496,8.4984856e-7,0.043984745,0.0013988302,0.000034638368,0.027879585,0.0063968482,0.00033035135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030891078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015722265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06692281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015118415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013968198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8773393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125733782","doi":"10.5167/uzh-143675","title":"Maternal depression,women’s empowerment, and parental investment: evidence from a large randomized control trial","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Grand Challenges Canada","keywords":"Empowerment; Psychological intervention; Randomized controlled trial; Depression (economics); Intervention (counseling); Leverage (statistics); Women's empowerment; Psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.017934231640338052,"score_gpt":0.28442113057529905,"score_spread":0.266486898934961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125733782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826472,0.0016532413,0.00012535612,0.00025942488,0.004815443,0.0014539193,0.0003349213,0.000104725375,0.008605801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959159,0.0009160686,0.00013556704,0.0006411469,0.00085833407,0.00033064393,0.000010316264,0.000027109185,0.0011649163],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965289,0.0007774227,0.00067542173,0.00069587165,0.0004891688,0.0008332001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970528,0.0008562227,0.00073765795,0.00068126566,0.00009508386,0.00057695754],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023569292,0.00035724175,0.0009523522,0.00010930424,0.0020910278,0.0006872378,0.0007697224,0.00027394493,0.0012873622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014087288,0.00032570635,0.00024336608,0.000044799745,0.0016320912,0.0009311976,0.00019614864,0.00027135067,0.00010836445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022861728,0.000094357725,0.96130764,0.000008636107,0.00018497082,0.000022207185,0.012499536,5.829612e-7,0.000042328295,0.0022658482,0.0006459399,0.000066247674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.46048492,0.00009138388,0.5256856,0.00016298566,0.0001523328,0.0000060444727,0.0064000906,0.0002761122,0.000016286183,0.0030873143,0.0030842014,0.0005527355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048758034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030527953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4376232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003960475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056902703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125813585","doi":"","title":"Manipulability in Matching Markets: Conflict and Coincidence of Interests","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative statics; Coincidence; Matching (statistics); Marriage market; Truncation (statistics); Mechanism (biology); Statics; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Demographic economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Medicine; Epistemology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.05208226575715561,"score_gpt":0.3607532635328937,"score_spread":0.3086709977757381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125813585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95202583,0.00017876571,0.0000066088046,0.00020997925,0.0004522916,0.00069485256,0.000041404786,0.00001894628,0.04637133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813905,0.01717223,0.00076051516,0.0000367344,0.00009022516,0.00005305501,0.000011512464,0.000026744641,0.00045848172],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966108,0.00078142015,0.0007375646,0.00081152364,0.0003458059,0.00071287196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752647,0.0011292939,0.00022486792,0.0007477109,0.00016656645,0.00020508113],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071478407,0.00022927519,0.00056058273,0.00041561123,0.00016188195,0.00014137897,0.00088630966,0.0007074422,0.00006279029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014510673,0.00026737322,0.000090614114,0.00015985803,0.0013053373,0.00014433272,0.0011910646,0.0023402257,0.0000018471927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017009741,0.0002607213,0.8780792,0.0006543976,0.000051863473,0.00006350812,0.038857337,0.0009510869,0.00033767984,0.0077649206,0.000014131551,0.07279506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006075248,0.000049343158,0.93358207,0.0005215926,0.0000073363526,0.0000052816195,0.03368572,0.0057853707,0.000021264761,0.021059426,0.0041200616,0.00055503024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008711636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.090927586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08221595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007315497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010708093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125884692","doi":"","title":"State Dependence in Canadian Welfare Participation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Spurious relationship; Generosity; Welfare; Probit model; Economics; Probit; Demographic economics; Welfare state; Ordered probit; Survey data collection; Econometrics; Labour economics; Political science; Politics; Statistics","score_opus":0.03827047680608512,"score_gpt":0.3427748831406783,"score_spread":0.30450440633459314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125884692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80706376,0.00007166187,0.0000023993716,0.0009980936,0.000472213,0.00065033935,0.00012036121,0.000025438558,0.19059573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926938,0.004213663,0.00018083706,0.000067881905,0.0001387722,0.00018186339,0.0001011504,0.000034822904,0.0023872042],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959858,0.00063333946,0.0005659636,0.00075940887,0.00040347164,0.001652031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843687,0.00020251359,0.00012324302,0.0005666811,0.00016667647,0.000504034],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035541072,0.00022146977,0.000347065,0.00078467804,0.0004508231,0.00025740746,0.0007885252,0.00052926864,0.000080580874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005608069,0.00028214388,0.00008194544,0.0003159246,0.00038381497,0.00015181421,0.00028693624,0.0014138619,0.00001528044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017044782,0.00009294093,0.8519214,0.00006349034,0.000019498872,0.00009675679,0.009647569,0.058107924,0.0000027957583,0.0042453166,0.000045569624,0.075739734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003437815,0.000026553647,0.91783273,0.00009861513,0.0000046168843,5.2644e-7,0.0076168594,0.014297261,0.0000026105313,0.00714456,0.052078266,0.0005536352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83945847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18820852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048061623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045146723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125900551","doi":"","title":"Competing Premarital Investments","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Economics; Investment (military); Marriage market; Quality (philosophy); Monetary economics; Labour economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0172126542696618,"score_gpt":0.256509574586167,"score_spread":0.23929692031650523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125900551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88659143,0.0034028299,0.0011107798,0.0011713565,0.0006250424,0.00013683362,0.0000018737983,0.0000731701,0.1068867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859214,0.0062817084,0.00020895977,0.00027597218,0.0005426302,0.000001908895,0.000001398661,0.0000147905375,0.0067512426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968261,0.00018792313,0.00020641454,0.00014889726,0.0004247818,0.0022058447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999515,0.000044103414,0.000112359754,0.000095584226,0.00008164233,0.00015129577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015014658,0.00010919797,0.00012330264,0.000070794275,0.0008986501,0.00012061568,0.00032585443,0.00008746908,0.00012830891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011847749,0.00010688274,0.00008575945,0.00022753768,0.00011945467,0.00024609294,0.000028059927,0.0010819947,0.00009976665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000586957,0.00017579156,0.11537512,0.000004132813,0.0001432054,0.000009788546,0.020820227,0.000034712677,0.000069266345,0.84860235,0.00046551492,0.01429403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001906288,0.0003934035,0.020473463,0.000046245208,0.00009400053,0.00023608244,0.2255973,0.001869662,0.000006425667,0.70905745,0.039503634,0.0008160496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030628633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031552892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20477708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009350418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007626215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6911781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125906062","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2004233","title":"Fiscal Incidence When Both Individual Welfare and Family Structure Matter: The Case of Subsidization of Home-Care for the Elderly","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Saskatchewan Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Welfare; Incidence (geometry); Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Public economics; Medicine; Market economy","score_opus":0.010391900850998084,"score_gpt":0.25622941449650855,"score_spread":0.24583751364551046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125906062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98356396,0.01059822,0.004099826,0.0010540542,0.00023470889,0.00027556563,0.000070828704,0.0000056261274,0.000097224685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979756,0.0015134268,0.00010998933,0.00007626696,0.0002513632,0.000004086314,0.0000058459636,0.000011894928,0.000051515155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982752,0.00018174299,0.00023658131,0.000099035096,0.00028221484,0.00092520483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922615,0.00016443228,0.00024777703,0.00013428644,0.00016611605,0.00006121514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001384658,0.00010690362,0.00014764225,0.000047504214,0.0009095203,0.00005816436,0.00034310014,0.00010587542,0.000016821954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006324407,0.000064683125,0.00006906564,0.0001578503,0.00024253307,0.00024623016,0.000038524602,0.0005287996,2.7062637e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006894663,0.000051449937,0.5215655,0.0000682645,0.0003025657,0.0000026263765,0.16815645,0.00012004545,0.0002606243,0.26795086,0.0002598493,0.041192852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064913067,0.00034012488,0.29439265,0.000020941761,0.00025740854,0.0003786732,0.63521975,0.00008739207,0.000019308056,0.067359366,0.0010753799,0.00019988153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010077338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015199069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4670633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014546273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005925713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8481437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125906403","doi":"","title":"Women and Children First, but Only If the Men are Union Members: Hiring Halls and Delinquent Child-Supporters","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Notre Dame journal of law, ethics & public policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Enforcement; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law enforcement; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03238912766278746,"score_gpt":0.30564929519459794,"score_spread":0.2732601675318105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125906403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8629925,0.00032251477,0.00027665333,0.11852018,0.00023455494,0.00019470093,0.000038487357,0.00003457828,0.017385788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98855263,0.0029951355,0.00022953114,0.006690836,0.0012618337,0.000003099413,0.0000055178757,0.000027120996,0.00023429486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967168,0.0008040555,0.0005707176,0.0002625315,0.0009282448,0.0007176741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973366,0.0005910493,0.0006865365,0.00028975526,0.0004824207,0.00061359664],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064701685,0.00024067878,0.00038872863,0.00022550969,0.0014300096,0.000607297,0.0006283268,0.00038502438,0.000019513782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014774514,0.00018256967,0.00010181075,0.00033242017,0.0010229783,0.00067559344,0.00017451524,0.0013163175,0.0000021266264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034426805,0.00018993713,0.21526979,0.000072484574,0.00044161134,0.000014348674,0.28970817,0.00012701198,0.00001975165,0.48089147,0.0022224125,0.011008591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027432744,0.00041633178,0.67425776,0.0003124262,0.00015998364,0.0004970729,0.06635663,0.00074293144,0.0000050419353,0.052614596,0.20097338,0.0009206015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010061944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0079673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45898795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031361025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009851578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125930175","doi":"","title":"A Collective Model of Household Behavior with Private Public Goods: Theory and Some Evidence from U.S. Data","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Consumer Expenditure Survey; Private good; Microeconomics; Revealed preference; Process (computing); Pareto principle; Survey data collection; Substitution (logic); Empirical evidence; Public economics; Econometrics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14213377700701232,"score_gpt":0.3530704086254579,"score_spread":0.21093663161844559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125930175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99079853,0.00071012205,0.000146195,0.00022911953,0.00014875199,0.0013769357,0.001407848,0.000045950746,0.0051365234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96343255,0.032691702,0.0027176384,0.000049281913,0.00012263458,0.0002049578,0.00010439676,0.000061148465,0.0006156844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593586,0.0008143577,0.00053656363,0.0013292307,0.00056891603,0.000815093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621344,0.0012308484,0.00030530756,0.0017726452,0.00017851284,0.00029923097],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004932944,0.00030591286,0.00061493524,0.0003917952,0.00038351782,0.00031365498,0.0021042214,0.00053388684,0.000012843859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012776391,0.00030820686,0.00006740181,0.00026210287,0.0017840172,0.0006694504,0.0025237286,0.0013434017,7.495574e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013733087,0.0018552542,0.6286194,0.00065141206,0.0010374468,0.00011428268,0.11411504,0.100291505,0.00067444093,0.102842726,0.000047998703,0.048377205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049840873,0.000724739,0.3388445,0.0036214278,0.00041273542,0.0000075098856,0.08132444,0.08714282,0.00011724924,0.47817397,0.00093564193,0.0037108683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030736034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0094975885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37533125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019390348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00971698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125953452","doi":"10.1111/jpet.12327","title":"Nursing home choices, family bargaining and optimal policy in a Hotelling economy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Bequest; Economics; Bargaining power; Overlapping generations model; Nursing homes; Power (physics); Labour economics; Decentralization; Robustness (evolution); Microeconomics; Nursing; Market economy; Medicine","score_opus":0.015129207244760846,"score_gpt":0.22666956709044436,"score_spread":0.2115403598456835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125953452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7586341,0.0011248464,0.006126658,0.010583334,0.000103242506,0.0008618232,0.00016972513,0.0003231096,0.22207317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98956674,0.001849765,0.0010464159,0.0034428781,0.0002770578,0.0000040786877,0.00008161495,0.000087650464,0.0036438028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960218,0.00044915435,0.00040653066,0.0011395002,0.00046854082,0.0015144534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970732,0.00062505645,0.00033885997,0.00044780277,0.00019181383,0.0013233123],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058350514,0.0006941283,0.0008657983,0.0011142797,0.0024021456,0.0017849058,0.001983983,0.0005269502,0.000065562264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020103654,0.00079329894,0.00028395056,0.0025931029,0.0016057224,0.0022053274,0.0016575366,0.00079283735,0.000021686346],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016695688,0.00011034155,0.036231942,0.000082505634,0.00020733017,0.00077143556,0.44846287,0.0020502,0.00007543156,0.5022026,0.00042203668,0.0077137467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013587567,0.00063310756,0.08516368,0.0006144721,0.0005604984,0.00018654535,0.24853256,0.022343246,0.00008010708,0.024563933,0.59998715,0.0037471275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004280543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031497958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5995651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021213233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010202616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126011823","doi":"","title":"Tax Options for Childcare that Encourage Work, Flexibility, Choice, Fairness and Quality","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"C.D. Howe Institute Commentary","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Taxable income; Earnings; Subsidy; Equity (law); Public economics; Tax deduction; Tax credit; Flexibility (engineering); Business; Income tax; Economics; Labour economics; Revenue; Work (physics); State income tax; Taxpayer; Tax reform; Gross income; Finance; Accounting","score_opus":0.1254694619071878,"score_gpt":0.38170642175248637,"score_spread":0.2562369598452986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126011823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95701426,0.0005235872,0.002761195,0.026213828,0.0029207568,0.0009963602,0.0004770966,0.00011373301,0.008979193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930767,0.0007257869,0.0016333276,0.002669257,0.00058477634,0.0000842773,0.00014994857,0.00001654023,0.0010594181],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983715,0.00013660218,0.00025564758,0.00044240057,0.000315172,0.00047871648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845386,0.00018029845,0.00020907167,0.0007920695,0.00011675698,0.00024792386],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095158484,0.00021172538,0.00028578902,0.00005795309,0.0040620742,0.00047374045,0.00082589453,0.00016330802,0.000026648855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026321685,0.00021501351,0.00012610113,0.00009401256,0.00096838165,0.0010445581,0.0003177909,0.00021763047,0.000005414217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035954996,0.0002147176,0.9376263,0.00007851637,0.00008223949,0.0000047530666,0.008705438,0.000030197045,0.000019890087,0.03190694,0.011487899,0.009807178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010511841,0.00003363555,0.709677,0.00006688099,0.000053975797,7.299449e-7,0.010821699,0.000032206743,0.000012367206,0.005269202,0.27257913,0.00040197314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012238517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055488072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26109123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023431618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013288148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126068539","doi":"","title":"Dynamic intrahousehold bargaining, matrimonial property law and suicide in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Property (philosophy); Economics; Demographic economics; Natural experiment; Survey data collection; Property rights; Suicide rates; Political science; Law; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Microeconomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.023114978885678563,"score_gpt":0.22749909702201304,"score_spread":0.20438411813633448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126068539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8017561,0.00082052656,0.00003185681,0.0004784057,0.00071981753,0.00095035863,0.0049125804,0.00035155733,0.18997882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951008,0.00036527726,0.00059446646,0.0015065368,0.00015969036,0.00005394527,0.00069470337,0.00015605548,0.0013685222],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99587166,0.00031745015,0.0008271216,0.0010620789,0.0007691077,0.0011526062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981638,0.00015057877,0.00030078276,0.0006204098,0.00006489482,0.0006995368],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047863193,0.00065344037,0.00072502706,0.00021495139,0.000371411,0.0018207727,0.0012348414,0.0006727012,0.00017394367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023756793,0.00056964665,0.0001502049,0.0004111154,0.00046485293,0.0019256205,0.0012209675,0.0018876059,0.00009696052],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108362365,0.00016769362,0.9655637,0.00021313464,0.00009245329,0.00030025656,0.0016754624,0.00006329417,0.000006897297,0.026534257,0.0009943777,0.0042801173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032154415,0.0002300709,0.2861025,0.0018282626,0.00022232204,0.000031413365,0.010469949,0.002349088,0.00008049449,0.36613432,0.32226384,0.0070722904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74795955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87821174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6794612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007201402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005816096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126093888","doi":"","title":"How does the marriage market clear? An empirical framework","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Marriage market; Matching (statistics); Statistic; Economics; Famine; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.05006823848720034,"score_gpt":0.36068231109182014,"score_spread":0.3106140726046198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126093888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7177553,0.00016740953,0.000034435012,0.008839697,0.0021413374,0.0013122023,0.00013157606,0.00012507748,0.26949295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89151996,0.083564706,0.0024417697,0.00076192047,0.002357345,0.00024903924,0.000048420647,0.0001207263,0.018936083],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937768,0.002306846,0.0005035212,0.0011945621,0.0007792096,0.0014390335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955817,0.0018335885,0.00020201372,0.0017007291,0.00021463691,0.0004673201],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049886117,0.00038366206,0.0005662143,0.00030335123,0.0012907072,0.00094473385,0.0023313684,0.0013388667,0.00021042756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021717248,0.0002938094,0.00027468152,0.00031043496,0.001972816,0.00022928132,0.0012266675,0.003966465,0.000011874727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059408956,0.0010963815,0.50518805,0.00030139743,0.0005148136,0.000378055,0.12583366,0.003425654,0.000012525604,0.020574892,0.0074909693,0.3345895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060647243,0.00020324286,0.19893762,0.00022519521,0.000029273113,0.000010341735,0.14627038,0.013327542,0.0000037038506,0.07822512,0.5606181,0.0015429762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007972331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006966119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55312717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001166522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001788281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126097994","doi":"","title":"Household Labour Supply and the Marriage Market in the UK, 1991-2008","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Homophily; Marriage market; Labour supply; Economics; Wage; Labour economics; British Household Panel Survey; Marital status; Leisure time; Supply and demand; Demographic economics; Production (economics); Panel data; Time-use survey; Sociology; Econometrics; Work (physics); Microeconomics; Demography","score_opus":0.03946600235502574,"score_gpt":0.31695866012924845,"score_spread":0.2774926577742227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126097994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6927678,0.0007084596,6.1094755e-7,0.004550679,0.0006810093,0.001482096,0.00023451832,0.000023602344,0.29955122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9028174,0.08794788,0.00009697283,0.00040360738,0.00048750485,0.00026135962,0.000028288607,0.000040299437,0.007916634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947001,0.002265789,0.0005197701,0.000791542,0.0005519047,0.0011709015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958185,0.0021167884,0.00023872491,0.0015789904,0.00008432613,0.00016267267],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01680472,0.00029990624,0.00053759955,0.00027087898,0.001283411,0.0009903171,0.0026387984,0.000580492,0.000088644534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016957296,0.00021718402,0.00016082128,0.00014955399,0.0025059113,0.00012831538,0.0013416936,0.0024333838,0.0000044738676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075121794,0.00035514592,0.6745008,0.00035804248,0.0002682395,0.00029458944,0.10830483,0.0019224591,0.000008080029,0.10784735,0.006407766,0.09898144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002611837,0.00004506325,0.67924196,0.00020860422,0.000021706495,0.000009587532,0.06432011,0.002013315,5.4462254e-7,0.048574135,0.20221421,0.0007389254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014619049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062492352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2916346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053248706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008903963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126106421","doi":"","title":"Joint Taxation and the Labour Supply of Married Women: Evidence from the Canadian Tax Reform of 1988","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Tax reform; Tax credit; Labour economics; State income tax; Liberian dollar; Value-added tax; Indirect tax; Tax rate; Direct tax; Ad valorem tax; Double taxation; Monetary economics; Public economics; Finance","score_opus":0.034720540564375964,"score_gpt":0.2972570126611121,"score_spread":0.26253647209673614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126106421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96647096,0.00041431535,0.0000015803295,0.0032939091,0.0002613333,0.00085596455,0.0005194916,0.0000067891465,0.028175669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827913,0.015073264,0.00019507801,0.00011540169,0.00018253595,0.00012362181,0.000033627675,0.000018932587,0.0014662598],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698806,0.0008345228,0.0006300307,0.00044514873,0.00045644605,0.00064579834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971436,0.0010505711,0.0005565713,0.0007649874,0.00029643186,0.00018781942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006955588,0.00017542446,0.00045245496,0.00019896089,0.0005167306,0.00016056138,0.0009395299,0.00037376847,0.0000632709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015828456,0.00012652371,0.00009951898,0.00020741548,0.0019944645,0.000105236315,0.0004306184,0.00092766865,0.0000012158239],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005338724,0.00014352037,0.61694664,0.00046125584,0.000427976,0.00001570988,0.21883905,0.006970008,0.00019606213,0.081347935,0.00054848683,0.073569454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007472188,0.000048375397,0.8855375,0.00032860742,0.0000154243,5.5530313e-7,0.0787054,0.0024451,0.00002562993,0.02527517,0.006570335,0.00030068305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8894322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95052034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26859084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027062849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036611129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73486876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127788054","doi":"10.33774/apsa-2021-v6s60","title":"Class, Social Mobility, and Voting: Evidence from Historical Voting Records","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"American Political Science Association","keywords":"Voting; Gentry; Incentive; Ballot; Secret ballot; Disapproval voting; Social class; Political science; Instant-runoff voting; Voting behavior; Turnout; Demographic economics; Economics; Labour economics; Law; Politics; Market economy","score_opus":0.06291160819509434,"score_gpt":0.31236550785038997,"score_spread":0.24945389965529563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127788054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9685916,0.0010181038,0.0038916778,0.005534265,0.0013003609,0.00010309594,0.000006717025,0.00013745372,0.019416757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887641,0.0002251882,0.0026556184,0.00039548974,0.00079937343,0.0000040554205,0.0000041737603,0.000009821916,0.007142192],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983431,0.0002830139,0.00023836098,0.0004113483,0.0003901447,0.0003340393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998992,0.0004988911,0.00006719889,0.00010794543,0.00019387672,0.00014003491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006756517,0.000109375585,0.00020174327,0.000022337299,0.0007350546,0.00013664002,0.00017600169,0.00017865308,0.00022323542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001048887,0.00011391353,0.00007166203,0.00029299493,0.00014770353,0.00021917402,0.00013568111,0.00019721339,0.000013827607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007434576,0.00009587059,0.9242691,0.000016666492,0.00002179608,0.000017026852,0.023550544,0.0000032437042,0.00043475634,0.038008627,0.007558204,0.0060167657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004990532,0.00005951185,0.8590255,0.00007710476,0.00009390301,0.000002459583,0.057040337,0.003981193,0.000059176928,0.011050592,0.0673271,0.0007840886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016304482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034297734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06524358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053259835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003780291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99024606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128297183","doi":"10.1093/esr/jcaa074","title":"Partners’ Relative Income and the Risk of Union Dissolution in Two Institutional Contexts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Sociological Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Grantová Agentura České Republiky","keywords":"Cohabitation; Demographic economics; Context (archaeology); Economics; Period (music); Demography; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.05523111676532622,"score_gpt":0.35981823886970415,"score_spread":0.30458712210437794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128297183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6359857,0.20846342,0.0013095079,0.0036196283,0.0002107733,0.00058159506,0.000027437956,0.00003686212,0.14976512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77644515,0.22284527,0.000104114275,0.00039186855,0.00004328373,0.0000035129758,0.000009932218,0.0000023931582,0.00015450073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923754,0.006865566,0.00028898843,0.00017088879,0.0001562773,0.00014291846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990048,0.0005952329,0.00015057232,0.000105221094,0.00009509625,0.00004912279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004606668,0.00007596584,0.0002622247,0.000009698526,0.00027600047,0.000010460903,0.00012439024,0.000033612407,0.000041103864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032636,0.000045088076,0.00009135413,0.00022163763,0.0014030397,0.000072925686,0.00009263188,0.0002514128,0.000018357992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007896532,0.00003855232,0.109155476,0.00006332347,0.000020082245,0.000014486859,0.0052310335,0.000010652073,0.0000043493187,0.8793758,0.00006388547,0.006014458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081096234,0.000021293314,0.9462997,0.0005970068,0.00005198457,0.0000017427179,0.0017722042,0.00002845508,1.5783941e-7,0.026927127,0.023384554,0.000104863044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009175952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013217787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8524487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004863659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008267372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51695585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129960758","doi":"10.1515/openps-2021-0008","title":"Factors That Militate Against Women Participation in Politics in Enugu State","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Political Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Global Affairs Canada","keywords":"Politics; Intimidation; State (computer science); Focus group; Democracy; Political science; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Sociology; Business; Economics; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.07705232166488951,"score_gpt":0.3808015810976748,"score_spread":0.3037492594327853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129960758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9356926,0.000013659207,0.00003183739,0.0010577817,0.0002406842,0.00022006423,0.000028724116,0.000016052678,0.06269857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973318,0.000030535535,0.00017243103,0.0010450672,0.00002367334,0.000026436559,0.000005803991,0.0000073843744,0.0013568468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961399,0.0003107589,0.00030138725,0.00047418577,0.00067888125,0.0020949307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984888,0.0002742756,0.00004043536,0.00026161873,0.00014555629,0.00078934635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020917708,0.00012937786,0.00022492603,0.00013754734,0.00040155495,0.00044205692,0.00082287577,0.00006947103,0.000083984174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015787483,0.00012279625,0.000027792676,0.001485275,0.0011761398,0.0008667148,0.00034091706,0.00018283079,0.000024079782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021782541,0.0001480792,0.5965423,0.000005709645,0.0000014501887,0.000021874335,0.039218258,0.000045556808,0.00016920296,0.36349416,0.0000078843195,0.00034333754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023795651,0.000019116804,0.885268,0.000019166306,0.0000013523672,1.4023172e-7,0.057914056,0.0003981075,0.0002816408,0.054814123,0.00086309866,0.00018324573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01606194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017907243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30868003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014610644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020637033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130395636","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-66085-7_3","title":"The Age of Negative Income Tax Experimentation (the 70s)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Exploring the basic income guarantee","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Basic income; Gross income; Public economics; Work (physics); Poverty; Cash; Economics; Income tax; Adjusted gross income; State income tax; Business; Labour economics; Tax reform; Economic growth; Finance; Engineering; Microeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.054761236274715824,"score_gpt":0.2877417531738437,"score_spread":0.23298051689912788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130395636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14373226,0.0031246522,0.0009672353,0.0048370436,0.014577914,0.013114339,0.00020354144,0.00034459625,0.8190984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43464637,0.007594571,0.00034318192,0.00066261325,0.003268301,0.0036801572,0.000061882194,0.00024179697,0.5495011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687684,0.00043185332,0.00067663944,0.0004284254,0.0010861498,0.0005000909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965657,0.0015253694,0.00053591846,0.0010291343,0.00029586878,0.000048028898],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017358406,0.00040819455,0.00047239795,0.0000952132,0.0021125397,0.00027021667,0.0015288381,0.00019976414,0.00010206691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026122102,0.00023843121,0.0003633542,0.00023271985,0.001410357,0.00037085844,0.00034148587,0.0007204699,0.00006262373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053425483,0.000022308457,0.00018997726,0.000035020654,0.0002405154,0.00002610189,0.08984139,0.00005316793,0.00006617893,0.9067177,0.00023401942,0.0025201857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016445145,0.00023282424,0.010301601,0.0011814351,0.0003549265,0.000010435972,0.1921461,0.000089258174,0.0004506493,0.26470006,0.5273573,0.0015309139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013981897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026169883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64201766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029267216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034061124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133483828","doi":"","title":"The Neoliberal Politics of the Child: Violence Against Women and Mother/Child Welfare, 1990-2012","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"York University Digital Library (York University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Politics; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.004777932048866751,"score_gpt":0.17202132900860964,"score_spread":0.16724339695974288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133483828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51662743,0.00027459254,0.0000050135427,0.0003661228,0.00053094217,0.0003162134,0.0007873249,0.00011908788,0.48097327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7594338,0.0022555508,0.00005190526,0.00017172156,0.00025218495,1.9217647e-7,0.00039159018,0.000050960734,0.23739208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789304,0.00021389348,0.00020127425,0.00048972043,0.00049007783,0.0007120135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985245,0.00012812408,0.0003889704,0.00052141934,0.00009947898,0.000337536],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008021194,0.00037401298,0.0003491055,0.00029922012,0.003846598,0.00033520293,0.0019207489,0.00045938027,0.000051110444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027167327,0.00033801905,0.000253325,0.0013362783,0.0013737101,0.0016559856,0.00038676482,0.00049249444,0.000013085865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007437329,0.00043749856,0.05201035,0.00026818947,0.00079397036,0.00009380884,0.06928122,0.000035224417,0.0000026104105,0.8550827,0.011358575,0.0098921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042414395,0.000059980866,0.014880188,0.00021999351,0.000064438595,0.0000013786555,0.1785161,0.000008923173,0.000003987521,0.0023429315,0.8030422,0.00043573085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045298866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000739258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8527398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024204334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047861546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134134834","doi":"10.1215/00703370-9009367","title":"Revealing the Concealed Effect of Top Earnings on the Gender Gap in the Economic Value of Higher Education in the United States, 1980–2017","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Decile; Educational attainment; Demographic economics; Economics; Wage; Labour economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Disadvantage; Inequality; Value (mathematics); Gender gap; Higher education; Political science; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.0243861302137813,"score_gpt":0.3055006730651072,"score_spread":0.2811145428513259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134134834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98672396,0.0004934927,0.0000063630796,0.0026577818,0.00030455395,0.00042123164,0.000011758722,0.0000066340726,0.0093742255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975235,0.0005226584,0.000016332453,0.0016895699,0.00008003301,0.00003319327,0.000028610526,0.0000069579924,0.00009917075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967708,0.0023474095,0.00025632657,0.00016359813,0.00025197773,0.00020986893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753654,0.0018225469,0.00018650906,0.00037415783,0.00006121806,0.000019043984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030983933,0.00010595527,0.00016125808,0.00012699027,0.00025260693,0.000051140763,0.0005608379,0.000076030046,0.00002000831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106585736,0.00005099951,0.00012062786,0.0010270346,0.00031083415,0.000044665754,0.000023060064,0.0002731239,0.0000021961728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003212674,0.000095001094,0.64352214,0.000038609818,0.000060929495,0.0000021879316,0.10375356,0.0020614276,0.0000866003,0.24729288,0.002622513,0.00043202925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032312292,0.00006204295,0.90513974,0.00004669807,0.00004612833,7.9481515e-7,0.073624484,0.00039308055,0.000038536018,0.0062012626,0.01401633,0.00010775606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005214433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010000516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26161763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000372584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024066806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78826976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134176408","doi":"10.3368/jhr.0521-11673r1","title":"Female Executives and the Motherhood Penalty","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Human Resources","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Quarter (Canadian coin); Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Representation (politics); Empirical evidence; Psychology; Labour economics; Business; Economics; Accounting; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.02939140249461235,"score_gpt":0.30134120980301765,"score_spread":0.2719498073084053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134176408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803711,0.0011429827,0.0000123279615,0.0024204538,0.00010665892,0.00009207658,0.0000016997808,0.000019634777,0.015833072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99391806,0.0014657034,0.000011153121,0.0002091134,0.00037836877,8.27059e-7,1.6486385e-7,0.000008482742,0.004008116],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851066,0.0006050819,0.0002166679,0.00005910389,0.0004024261,0.00020607348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902165,0.00047764194,0.00023056025,0.00012598584,0.00008020872,0.00006397396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033947474,0.00007432508,0.00015899031,0.000068784764,0.0012250659,0.00010433324,0.0004972586,0.0000378257,0.00004224332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012770758,0.000035602516,0.00007695486,0.0002265835,0.00091652054,0.00008004843,0.00006320538,0.00020769438,0.000009847191],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001208074,0.000032543903,0.023112565,0.000011992347,0.00012563616,0.000013156533,0.9470584,0.000120616605,0.0003385601,0.024923975,0.00332893,0.0008128559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011846783,0.00012471917,0.20378754,0.000043072392,0.00010209513,0.000019172885,0.74736613,0.00008165462,0.000016172453,0.027648512,0.019497598,0.00012868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028406468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042279676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19969226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015261705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000359342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94223404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136351527","doi":"10.3386/w28556","title":"The Effects of Child Tax Benefits on Poverty and Labor Supply: Evidence from the Canada Child Benefit and Universal Child Care Benefit","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Statistics Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Poverty; Child poverty; Economics; Child care; Labour economics; Public economics; Demographic economics; Medicine; Economic growth; Nursing","score_opus":0.06330361616147395,"score_gpt":0.3704616382766847,"score_spread":0.30715802211521076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136351527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65025276,0.11515822,1.705502e-7,0.024424484,0.0020462158,0.0019904799,0.006014834,0.000016371898,0.20009647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90196717,0.09517026,0.000009908696,0.00023244541,0.000788696,0.000029347599,0.00037738658,0.000029811663,0.0013949767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995893,0.00027878743,0.00046307113,0.0006423217,0.0022316366,0.00049116736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909669,0.006154616,0.00034003466,0.00043338045,0.0019223698,0.00018267936],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019188452,0.00026596346,0.00047816042,0.00015156467,0.0017257628,0.00016659538,0.0008519293,0.00036087804,0.000054510867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002623726,0.00020031538,0.00010918308,0.00029353998,0.0006284491,0.00015217582,0.00032540972,0.00092400966,0.0000012938491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021036269,0.000108133536,0.25197142,0.00067107746,0.0011661303,0.000022396163,0.008822443,0.0014145239,0.0000085641905,0.67271787,0.051848106,0.011038959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086625357,0.00020921942,0.9014744,0.002793812,0.000110999936,0.000010125476,0.012614258,0.00010433883,0.00006712018,0.012390403,0.068833575,0.00052549737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7845239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93236053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6603275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017540113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061228517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136616391","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3801258","title":"Respondent Biases in Household Surveys","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Econometrics; Survey research; Statistics; Geography; Economics; Psychology; Environmental science; Political science; Mathematics; Socioeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.03905010065579958,"score_gpt":0.2970857523110988,"score_spread":0.25803565165529924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136616391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883067,0.0039537116,0.0013467867,0.001033303,0.00050374214,0.000061426996,0.00000561361,0.000033054224,0.004755632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738693,0.01813306,0.00004290556,0.00016660946,0.00031903508,0.0000020654745,0.000004323249,0.000016487276,0.007446185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954213,0.0013046543,0.0002590529,0.00019854779,0.00045785657,0.0023586203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993296,0.0001871808,0.000084546264,0.0001469735,0.0001233485,0.00012835106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008162811,0.00010726735,0.00016354695,0.00013806154,0.00038018447,0.00012571394,0.00028311159,0.00011098882,0.000051265197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063764636,0.00010908341,0.00009437858,0.0006693651,0.00007876273,0.0001836908,0.00003457626,0.001258181,0.000015912066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038350747,0.0003959055,0.5530679,0.0000055475034,0.00012650527,0.00024759877,0.010239211,0.00096415257,0.00070203206,0.41974732,0.00042766385,0.014037805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017209684,0.00020417877,0.50642556,0.00006793206,0.000038324913,0.00024200403,0.17411888,0.000108770066,0.0000646313,0.30301127,0.013382243,0.0006152383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017452564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18431962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18257436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014441658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0090253875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140541876","doi":"","title":"Control over Money in Marriage","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Control (management); Consumption (sociology); Division of labour; Position (finance); Economics; Set (abstract data type); Demographic economics; Political science; Finance; Sociology; Law; Management","score_opus":0.029575471764759324,"score_gpt":0.3298953049503638,"score_spread":0.30031983318560446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140541876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6528601,0.00018774939,0.000006664371,0.0003534815,0.0009808039,0.0010372825,0.00009335096,0.000034522505,0.34444603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773231,0.015688753,0.00024253385,0.00032862942,0.0003192798,0.00022393336,0.000030206855,0.000062140025,0.005781419],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950731,0.0012951649,0.00071272807,0.0010021976,0.000511019,0.0014058172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977893,0.000698826,0.00017465984,0.00087721087,0.0001304925,0.00032948187],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005435905,0.0003214919,0.0006595349,0.0006107815,0.00028606204,0.00026514145,0.0010169194,0.0009467401,0.00027123682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011062195,0.0003849851,0.00019304203,0.00029484296,0.00062881643,0.0001392672,0.00041769317,0.0022534041,0.000024691628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002127115,0.0007091844,0.87735337,0.00024308026,0.00021681798,0.0002571753,0.018540056,0.022959996,0.000097545846,0.038794793,0.0007338729,0.039881375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0070214025,0.00016524082,0.6497903,0.00049483695,0.000037327918,0.0000040184077,0.037469637,0.022518178,0.000008963138,0.06434531,0.21539627,0.0027485604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044277203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023989758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33866462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023249516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019831248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140646218","doi":"10.7202/1076386ar","title":"EST-CE PARCE QU’ILS SONT MARIÉS QUE LES HOMMES MARIÉS GAGNENT PLUS QUE LES HOMMES NON-MARIÉS ?","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.04281057097141719,"score_gpt":0.27758104439823017,"score_spread":0.23477047342681298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140646218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8929266,0.020968297,0.004493416,0.023362944,0.005575969,0.0014146648,0.0008188569,0.00034541482,0.050093878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9046595,0.026531743,0.0040021352,0.005090221,0.002658194,0.00027917908,0.00031724325,0.00021443253,0.056247342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99065953,0.0021197721,0.0017947885,0.0020353706,0.0005396557,0.0028508664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993589,0.0021733646,0.00082803477,0.0015710001,0.00062173285,0.001216881],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002453045,0.0013795155,0.0018546022,0.00025088058,0.0016788534,0.0010331639,0.001606862,0.001957401,0.0025272449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011405511,0.0015346087,0.00094602344,0.00086131186,0.0015226713,0.0010652221,0.0008813042,0.0016453698,0.0004397032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022072557,0.0017236876,0.09566221,0.0011273435,0.0011671197,0.0005714968,0.11435484,0.0020524478,0.00066191284,0.6074733,0.021910734,0.15307419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029130804,0.00044778557,0.0598941,0.0007634985,0.00056419976,0.00009636266,0.20019512,0.004475399,0.0010053812,0.040634263,0.685256,0.003754804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16489649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14448205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6633453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002194498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006159209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142030293","doi":"","title":"The Effect of Paid Parental Leave on Breastfeeding, Parental Health and Behavior","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parental leave; Breastfeeding; Duration (music); Demographic economics; Health insurance; Health plan; Demography; Psychology; Political science; Business; Medicine; Economics; Economic growth; Sociology; Health care; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.017110593418254934,"score_gpt":0.2597474897810522,"score_spread":0.24263689636279728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142030293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766007,0.0012174929,0.000038123468,0.00091377005,0.0006658964,0.0013598031,0.0012583876,0.000066761844,0.017879065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903649,0.0066364133,0.0003199933,0.00005630267,0.00009459279,0.000003489769,0.0002834817,0.00003980079,0.002201021],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955148,0.0014561387,0.0004307527,0.0008037632,0.0010514288,0.0007430948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677545,0.0009600808,0.00075323915,0.00088279916,0.00015239528,0.00047606183],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013715575,0.00050205557,0.0009133583,0.00023758646,0.0015217869,0.000058137564,0.0016370512,0.00034433196,0.000049906386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016949,0.0004841623,0.00054628105,0.00018097958,0.002434187,0.000108180706,0.0016773527,0.0012230863,0.000009625451],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001555642,0.0005787196,0.7349261,0.0009505987,0.0005756659,0.000060062208,0.21563867,0.00013340337,0.00008401319,0.004138509,0.0024516806,0.03890694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037511627,0.0036308507,0.63906485,0.0015731395,0.00058096333,0.000023000286,0.32808727,0.0029446036,0.000018191711,0.0007607417,0.018268963,0.0012962872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028688526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01991888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1124486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000441602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009323512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144124541","doi":"","title":"The Long-Term Effects of a Generous Income Support Program: Unemployment Insurance in New Brunswick and Maine, 1940-1991","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Demographic economics; Term (time); Economics; Differential (mechanical device); Labour economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.07144927795455015,"score_gpt":0.42105690536727985,"score_spread":0.3496076274127297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3144124541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853389,0.00054210704,0.0000042094102,0.0006437911,0.00011731771,0.0006888408,0.000005892085,0.000009302066,0.012649605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970739,0.00060713757,0.00017192289,0.000013747383,0.00016035003,0.000028978508,0.000024139126,0.000008874663,0.0019109864],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831766,0.0002019437,0.0003539048,0.00021310533,0.00055249507,0.0003608784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986404,0.0008138383,0.000104061895,0.00012871188,0.00023130355,0.000081673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019871576,0.00008217135,0.00017068822,0.0001951186,0.00021424076,0.00005772288,0.0003210155,0.00009498858,0.000010045274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019403019,0.00007174553,0.00004147087,0.00027433742,0.00056282233,0.000110234134,0.000073997166,0.0001611936,0.0000063292437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023022756,0.00008921652,0.6997678,0.00003892746,0.000014140389,0.0000024320725,0.0004799092,0.00012597689,0.00004958138,0.29659885,0.00030865497,0.0025014172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006261412,0.00010999687,0.9262297,0.000021259457,0.0000019276179,9.228808e-7,0.00012269714,0.00013812153,0.00004496853,0.0722003,0.0004340226,0.00006995861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03394512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084062144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22646183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034151357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018222845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9724879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148246334","doi":"10.1257/mac.20200318","title":"Hours, Occupations, and Gender Differences in Labor Market Outcomes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Macroeconomics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nonmarket forces; Narrative; Productivity; Welfare; Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Factor market; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.019440230072018953,"score_gpt":0.28115637086522927,"score_spread":0.2617161407932103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148246334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99069077,0.0002604794,0.000052923522,0.0018733019,0.0008556347,0.00015923823,0.00018062064,0.000025599713,0.0059014084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99369293,0.0031491753,0.0006259052,0.0016755116,0.00016993319,0.000024454728,0.0000051455213,0.000024330619,0.00063263916],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815845,0.00036820944,0.000523325,0.00031947636,0.00010436199,0.0005261706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883276,0.00027200437,0.00046381028,0.00017533102,0.000022430078,0.00023363292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011735532,0.00018741316,0.0004408403,0.0002816502,0.0008993212,0.0002273952,0.00046190264,0.000037831283,0.0008448901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000499949,0.00021259954,0.00009417938,0.00013267486,0.0004885601,0.00030962925,0.00016127696,0.00044011045,0.000016745485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021443913,0.000035334233,0.98329854,0.0000015173385,0.000052424293,0.000006965295,0.0059818574,0.0004156621,6.418904e-7,0.0044886875,0.0011771411,0.0045197825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045443745,0.000054181903,0.92211944,0.0000013640129,0.000013665086,0.000025771009,0.06269092,0.00077561906,9.270544e-8,0.004711008,0.008888991,0.00026447853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028385585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039047292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061179075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009915375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006239729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9250954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149499303","doi":"","title":"The Long-Term Effects of California’s 2004 Paid Family Leave Act on Women’s Careers: Evidence from U.S. Tax Data","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Parental leave; Quarter (Canadian coin); Maternity leave; Demographic economics; Work hours; Wage; Labour economics; Economics; Work (physics); Hourly wage; Panel data; Demography; Psychology; Working hours; National Longitudinal Surveys; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.1994638465709567,"score_gpt":0.4500888277798329,"score_spread":0.2506249812088762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149499303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98300135,0.00097004906,0.000010448297,0.00077189354,0.00047239158,0.00060349994,0.00039379305,0.000009482276,0.013767086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673,0.0014092887,0.000037171787,0.000060782608,0.0002758853,0.00003478647,0.00011852379,0.00001306768,0.0013204368],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970268,0.00049529993,0.00034642668,0.00043464112,0.0012140257,0.0004828089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924445,0.00610026,0.00016520938,0.00066592515,0.00049627945,0.00012783238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048713186,0.000114866474,0.00023668849,0.00016043926,0.00028418904,0.00010004458,0.0017052488,0.00014642808,0.00013316415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020899063,0.0000948499,0.000061217695,0.00018473863,0.0005120373,0.0003294493,0.00027427435,0.00032485864,0.00032614486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000563164,0.00031139478,0.8279964,0.00027385904,0.00049325183,0.000007699682,0.014532679,0.0016791499,0.003945224,0.11681639,0.026289355,0.007091475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001953722,0.00072009105,0.85835665,0.0005995911,0.000027090577,5.4859566e-7,0.015946658,0.0030254044,0.00073125615,0.11339213,0.004678552,0.00056829554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009858328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039709415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030360296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011655815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018227494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151058323","doi":"10.1007/s00355-021-01379-y","title":"Childlessness, childfreeness and compensation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Childlessness; Fertility; Imperfect; Social policy; Compensation (psychology); Economics; Consumption (sociology); Demographic economics; Population; Psychology; Social psychology; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.01721279559738977,"score_gpt":0.27670633269590306,"score_spread":0.2594935370985133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151058323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693675,0.00097444345,0.000048999736,0.009343812,0.00029105073,0.00009909614,0.00003188188,0.000055993725,0.019787244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977983,0.0005562623,0.00004287365,0.0004753042,0.0007679192,0.0000044583553,0.00004824567,0.000009410342,0.0002972125],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991546,0.00011477119,0.000103114675,0.0002155456,0.00019739516,0.00021453027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964905,0.00003961941,0.000043131095,0.00006570721,0.00011964004,0.00008287992],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015638133,0.00009111731,0.00014583171,0.000022111546,0.001755707,0.00013418804,0.000069023605,0.00013583821,0.000050219296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062390674,0.000099444835,0.000041808187,0.00020805164,0.00020586269,0.00015478658,0.000049026577,0.0001068906,0.0000023748748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031589063,0.00005475694,0.64441776,0.000045734207,0.00004046954,0.0000060562966,0.03576404,0.0000013494675,0.000033541644,0.3058078,0.000255586,0.01356973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002960517,0.000005554176,0.9118461,0.000007083812,0.000025715653,8.384136e-7,0.038813427,0.000007825391,0.0000021713838,0.002789522,0.046062984,0.00014274768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018976792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007875213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30301827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025955409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008391015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152681186","doi":"10.1007/s43545-021-00103-y","title":"Examining the family dynamics of the Canadian gender income gap","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SN Social Sciences","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Demographic economics; Gender gap; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.09316495389115503,"score_gpt":0.3166461620503981,"score_spread":0.22348120815924305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152681186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6233034,0.00023738744,0.000038938742,0.004323227,0.001354117,0.00013851772,0.000034718458,0.000020729167,0.37054896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974962,0.000046354093,0.000140941,0.0010120512,0.0002901551,0.00000550112,0.0000024927385,0.0000068314657,0.0009994599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747556,0.00046962965,0.00022235239,0.0002750456,0.0009619289,0.0005954537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913615,0.0001790171,0.00013503234,0.00019251827,0.00024516167,0.00011214436],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019261534,0.0001120412,0.00015629818,0.00005559678,0.0057614385,0.000246041,0.0010917186,0.00014847422,0.0000626872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003164682,0.00007359171,0.000105691135,0.0020081387,0.0027908557,0.00016119286,0.00014105036,0.00021208159,0.0000072895114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.006132e-7,0.000014602042,0.33385864,0.0000054761267,0.000016353632,0.0000027975975,0.053395398,0.000048202655,0.000061874525,0.61018056,0.00051024865,0.001905247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008756404,0.000011285126,0.7281939,0.0000095400555,0.000022025246,9.1485896e-7,0.22217053,0.0003416196,0.000007818438,0.04295058,0.006025677,0.00017853426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2507899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92384195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6730521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037022424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004516748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152773232","doi":"10.20955/wp.2018.022","title":"Why did Rich Families Increase their Fertility? Inequality and Marketization of Child Care","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Russian Science Foundation; Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Marketization; Inequality; Fertility; Demographic economics; Gender inequality; Economics; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.025093895202680377,"score_gpt":0.2933320001638795,"score_spread":0.26823810496119915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152773232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5045802,0.0020491772,0.00031722337,0.0001669861,0.0007211854,0.0004863073,0.0004429487,0.000094344774,0.49114165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860047,0.010701217,0.00013472678,0.00037032575,0.00036578946,0.000014827531,0.00041962182,0.000028524546,0.0019602622],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715227,0.00055014313,0.00054702105,0.00049784506,0.0009303591,0.0003223894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716693,0.00018378331,0.0003476671,0.00045718031,0.0016842576,0.00016017715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001968985,0.00029137929,0.0005497883,0.00015208437,0.00045953874,0.00007219206,0.00029788038,0.0005592237,0.00016174682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001242006,0.00023987071,0.00011496385,0.0004092972,0.00063229975,0.00014338036,0.00016208712,0.00021460673,0.000001961645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056787547,0.0001232117,0.9411398,0.0010771634,0.00013030732,0.0000019266008,0.038567122,0.000001167153,0.0000057817665,0.00077039714,0.014340769,0.0037855515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019348928,0.000056440633,0.7923717,0.00015350652,0.000104041734,0.0000011718272,0.07219926,0.000023674475,0.000011505247,0.0006085063,0.1338515,0.0004252203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04643275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053542666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4891814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023197725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010499035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9781644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152870237","doi":"","title":"Can Economic Pressure Overcome Social Norms? The Case of Female Labor Force Participation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Generalitat de Catalunya; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Workforce; Demographic economics; Portuguese; Emigration; Shock (circulatory); Immigration; Labour economics; Economics; Political science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03871629382854407,"score_gpt":0.3576966186980011,"score_spread":0.31898032486945704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152870237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.955947,0.000030660558,0.0000014767082,0.00090242655,0.00028134303,0.0003769535,0.000092505885,0.000025233268,0.042342447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99629694,0.0005319967,0.00004486378,0.00010060738,0.0005566628,0.00005043653,0.000005655716,0.000025410951,0.0023874533],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981385,0.00039135263,0.00036280643,0.00031719008,0.00014611182,0.0006440558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988538,0.00038791914,0.00013421453,0.00034453976,0.00016019338,0.00011932597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002075437,0.000114521485,0.00021809817,0.000115553026,0.0007534301,0.00008824984,0.00041461684,0.00017160573,0.000098503435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026933185,0.00010409474,0.000075726944,0.00017731659,0.001165509,0.00017413982,0.00012270326,0.00027528437,0.000008911634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025771977,0.00037143446,0.48565698,0.00013174402,0.00030013203,0.000084131716,0.21947502,0.0029652223,0.00036895424,0.18952422,0.0005436979,0.10032075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026370515,0.0006045803,0.5556879,0.000054422057,0.000091406786,0.000029093942,0.27356523,0.03593476,0.00037244943,0.01717536,0.11274359,0.0011041231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052671083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11069742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17234886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041442268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064127345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90553004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156411587","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3387335","title":"Matching Function Equilibria: Existence, Uniqueness and Estimation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Uniqueness; Function (biology); Mathematics; Matching (statistics); Mathematical economics; Estimation; Applied mathematics; Econometrics; Economics; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Biology; Evolutionary biology","score_opus":0.010115640188206189,"score_gpt":0.2615999518887005,"score_spread":0.2514843117004943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156411587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9520286,0.00069679006,0.038123216,0.0003046837,0.0005450653,0.0001231069,6.156291e-7,0.000042309905,0.008135665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99493915,0.0018965426,0.00030717664,0.00008146454,0.00019533455,0.0000017208284,0.0000024256549,0.00001152743,0.0025646875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982021,0.00013998062,0.000160357,0.00014868418,0.00027340837,0.0010754601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960876,0.00004495051,0.000109156164,0.00008399065,0.00007849342,0.00007465669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018730868,0.00008982668,0.00011314834,0.000077838165,0.00042061156,0.00013590406,0.00013677814,0.000094488256,0.000020737698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024275658,0.00008568937,0.000039851297,0.00018696133,0.000057434056,0.00049154926,0.000021143394,0.00065812917,0.000025769263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019334842,0.000013484919,0.015064545,0.0000063731854,0.000029542878,5.3795134e-7,0.0029406818,0.00024321681,0.00038231112,0.9722852,0.000006086223,0.009008658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003221398,0.00012950068,0.00931323,0.000018542156,0.000025766954,0.000038145983,0.036874156,0.0016495681,0.0000020732866,0.95088947,0.00059275574,0.00014468047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005455672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019792789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042910576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004952505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013852582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3494311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159133776","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v16i2.5412","title":"Creating Scandal: Prison Abolition and the Policy Agenda","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Political science; Public administration; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.022409406925905043,"score_gpt":0.3295969456839136,"score_spread":0.3071875387580086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159133776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9063616,0.00081102044,0.012449726,0.010034393,0.0006521156,0.0003219763,0.0000065783397,0.00003873446,0.06932389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932365,0.0010876926,0.0026952901,0.0010649235,0.0011204623,0.0000017472114,8.571284e-7,0.000018936857,0.00077358604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770707,0.0003357716,0.00058311736,0.0001571572,0.0007281115,0.0004887642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805063,0.0006390552,0.00064095453,0.00016757312,0.00025340135,0.00024840824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049929842,0.000155569,0.00031563226,0.0003013927,0.00084365206,0.00015668137,0.0003272786,0.00012974264,0.00001550824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093652186,0.00010827139,0.00016261863,0.000505003,0.0005286844,0.00024768864,0.000041398114,0.0004987959,0.0000050869176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010975949,0.0004358437,0.09643624,0.000038467,0.00029142876,0.00007148363,0.20451437,0.00029895263,0.0007131859,0.5889957,0.0074697635,0.099637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015708013,0.00092335796,0.41623914,0.00035043695,0.00042053507,0.00015265775,0.28056702,0.0008541881,0.0003696253,0.035928,0.24743055,0.0010564957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001241681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005834473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5530677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002644454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047648896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64887744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160876634","doi":"10.47264/idea.lassij/4.1.8","title":"Are the Millennials Getting Less Married?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Demography; Demographic economics; Globalization; Educational attainment; Secularization; Causality (physics); Instrumental variable; Regression analysis; Economics; Geography; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Political science; Economic growth; Econometrics; Statistics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07072663312406183,"score_gpt":0.32851369302668143,"score_spread":0.25778705990261963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160876634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74048984,0.00030085654,0.0005682585,0.21773328,0.0026554791,0.00012648814,0.000021611679,0.000047081176,0.038057107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97848207,0.00039417774,0.00024276157,0.015595911,0.0043980917,0.0000031215686,0.0000013485808,0.00000765558,0.00087488495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977347,0.00022539626,0.00030073372,0.00024332678,0.0011094828,0.0003863572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903786,0.00015008777,0.0003539892,0.00003656645,0.00024312783,0.00017833743],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011508254,0.00012926849,0.00016814143,0.000049505277,0.0035280029,0.0012410884,0.00086259266,0.00008535359,0.00010730448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022995267,0.00008887457,0.00011854895,0.00022407685,0.0010467999,0.000513149,0.00014175696,0.0003246277,0.000009366136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006937558,0.00011224132,0.27806655,0.0000139565645,0.00022568982,0.00016090495,0.26805463,0.0001773933,0.00033668426,0.33380944,0.044957,0.07401616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008605986,0.000102668215,0.13302642,0.000060981478,0.000045509565,0.000042225445,0.27500817,0.0016635254,0.000014507392,0.038235694,0.5502986,0.0006411457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019030905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048377537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50534153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074977535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020130278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162119417","doi":"10.5430/ijba.v12n3p108","title":"Spousal Secret Affairs with Money: Intra-household Allocative Efficiency in Spaces of Gender Politics in Development","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Business Administration","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Allocative efficiency; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Negotiation; Politics; Welfare; Public economics; Pareto principle; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Sociology; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.029171051070146663,"score_gpt":0.2890282062476983,"score_spread":0.25985715517755165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162119417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869126,0.00009427854,0.008639392,0.0010313526,0.00048188472,0.000076643744,0.000007878043,0.0000055952823,0.0027503807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966277,0.0001539314,0.0029297995,0.0000540271,0.00015423914,0.0000021078777,0.000016759948,0.000009120164,0.000052343345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819416,0.00009837967,0.00057532365,0.0001343291,0.00081925746,0.0001785499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799013,0.00008374394,0.00040390703,0.000062636136,0.0013936335,0.00006597279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048819833,0.00010542014,0.00019495182,0.00027715683,0.000047368285,0.00008148391,0.0002505436,0.00008089294,0.000020821097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002291224,0.00009938395,0.000030070989,0.0005352492,0.00013181164,0.00033378715,0.00002288018,0.00015373323,5.976921e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046738298,0.0022876589,0.7813734,0.000095859155,0.00024385641,0.0015004318,0.0844209,0.030633148,0.0037580538,0.09368027,0.000044796237,0.0014942678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013018724,0.00009112631,0.92849976,0.00025052435,0.00001713425,0.00008410682,0.064967334,0.0003995317,0.0022164595,0.0015248043,0.00043172284,0.00021560185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019203474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00459188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1471264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030657582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034760837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6166423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162360684","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdad021","title":"Human Capital, Female Employment, and Electricity: Evidence from the Early 20th-Century United States","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Electrification; Electricity; Quarter (Canadian coin); Human capital; Empirical evidence; Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Rural electrification; Capital (architecture); Human capital theory; Mechanism (biology); Period (music); Economic growth; Engineering; Geography; Electrical engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.08893740157636551,"score_gpt":0.35574105701424436,"score_spread":0.2668036554378789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162360684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67905045,0.31750673,5.292054e-7,0.0027574766,0.00014478737,0.00030699378,0.00002685485,0.000026731435,0.00017945802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31044158,0.6885968,0.0000045792103,0.00057432416,0.000088590896,0.000023756947,0.000006608789,0.0000065888275,0.00025716508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988122,0.00031319118,0.00031994432,0.00019275889,0.00011433594,0.00024757738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998344,0.0010783651,0.00020478384,0.00026680512,0.00007188997,0.000034133875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014603253,0.00012290328,0.00035338334,0.000036583355,0.00066859944,0.000038964055,0.00038165474,0.000025510119,0.000023056095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027891292,0.00007263111,0.0000734702,0.00029727753,0.000507208,0.00010149329,0.00016641027,0.000091458176,0.000055399138],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018269286,0.00007415078,0.43556222,0.0021582085,0.0023005698,0.000005483107,0.42212248,0.00008553816,0.00007859372,0.054635163,0.07279881,0.01016049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005035582,0.00024309508,0.6162322,0.007454377,0.00083578494,8.4213895e-7,0.25085816,0.000106342326,0.0000134799375,0.02979163,0.09324745,0.00071305834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078060594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024017298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37109005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007885112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054746182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99880105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164039973","doi":"10.1086/715485","title":"World War II, the Baby Boom, and Employment: County-Level Evidence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Baby boom; Fertility; Boom; World War II; Total fertility rate; Demographic economics; First world war; Economics; Demography; Spanish Civil War; Labour economics; Political science; Population; History; Sociology; Law; Family planning; Research methodology; Engineering","score_opus":0.05174409984851565,"score_gpt":0.2915880436900077,"score_spread":0.23984394384149205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164039973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790872,0.0058694733,0.000068930945,0.01107812,0.001190444,0.000071393864,0.00004766811,0.0000074298746,0.0025793493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94646865,0.04097244,0.0014911065,0.003836711,0.0010045329,0.0000020247712,0.0000013403098,0.000020263133,0.0062029087],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988393,0.00012933633,0.0004469623,0.00014744488,0.00017443534,0.00026247947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998541,0.0004027499,0.0003638888,0.00018151432,0.00035080197,0.00016004487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012824048,0.00011133285,0.00024151702,0.00006533878,0.00056415977,0.00015876262,0.0003440067,0.00006887183,0.00009134122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032037502,0.00008957512,0.00008970229,0.00022435025,0.00019910387,0.00049741974,0.000088751185,0.00025879036,0.0000049705873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019456094,0.00046246793,0.5574542,0.000072088806,0.0007577226,0.00020131413,0.13683501,0.001986204,0.0005551552,0.25010636,0.032863304,0.018511562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009022298,0.00013473326,0.17783687,0.00017202063,0.00016328848,0.000074095515,0.0475635,0.00049057667,0.00011075813,0.01553041,0.7565944,0.0004270857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017688604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009441648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72373116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020209314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085638673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5268661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164490206","doi":"","title":"Tax Relief for Breadwinners or Caregivers? The Designs of Earned and Child Tax Credits in Five Anglo-American Countries","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tax credit; Earned income tax credit; Work (physics); Poverty; Tax reform; Labour economics; Balance (ability); Public economics; Economics; Economic growth; Business; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.009839504555257686,"score_gpt":0.2565417490255277,"score_spread":0.24670224447027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164490206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98382276,0.0028247775,0.0045329216,0.005566055,0.00025036902,0.0005123779,0.00006917165,0.000021610127,0.002399929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99019337,0.006913927,0.0001259888,0.00012480572,0.00035741724,0.000008629669,0.000004176117,0.00001419295,0.0022574698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997817,0.00017141813,0.000243105,0.00016944106,0.00030616377,0.001292866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999186,0.00023112174,0.00025915788,0.000099969424,0.00016713906,0.000056633882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015166237,0.00012658913,0.00022091073,0.00009723313,0.0006512956,0.00006453207,0.00028574024,0.00007534278,0.000006003894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015227986,0.000090482914,0.0000702809,0.00039721382,0.0005578651,0.0001437995,0.000019012985,0.0005542784,6.7403545e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001269987,0.00032359274,0.106505245,0.0000574198,0.0004212468,0.00002133745,0.09391574,0.0013241735,0.00015530863,0.7770313,0.007205451,0.011769227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039080204,0.0022296053,0.07279687,0.00010799486,0.00018603107,0.00013592349,0.7527229,0.00045974905,0.000038345584,0.13907012,0.027674273,0.00067013095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0223409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22596742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6588072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005185832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022564733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9841694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165709126","doi":"10.1111/labr.12195","title":"Public kindergarten, maternal labor supply, and earnings in the longer run: Too little too late?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Childbirth; Quarter (Canadian coin); Affect (linguistics); Spurious relationship; Demographic economics; Economics; Human capital; Labour economics; Psychology; Pregnancy; Economic growth; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.02109168346560943,"score_gpt":0.2543326908823639,"score_spread":0.23324100741675444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165709126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732499,0.00046781337,0.000017767841,0.0151315285,0.00038715574,0.00011547222,0.000036273283,0.000042236155,0.010551863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97605276,0.000650701,0.0002428111,0.003233935,0.00022769434,0.000012278075,0.00001292487,0.000013999345,0.019552901],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834776,0.00032339583,0.00018206451,0.00027244657,0.00039535973,0.00047894494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993189,0.00011591513,0.000058023466,0.00021558916,0.0001797803,0.00011181197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072486175,0.0001232572,0.00015683092,0.000053738564,0.00034565825,0.00046708708,0.00030413806,0.00014170652,0.00038184493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021918198,0.00009988402,0.000038974624,0.0005944613,0.0001475837,0.00027087354,0.00008266854,0.00026072765,0.00005343868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035397547,0.000050577404,0.9068839,0.000013170669,0.000012535861,0.00008809777,0.028546669,0.0000031503037,0.00017468026,0.062148936,0.0013225367,0.0007522225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026240613,0.000012833509,0.8599915,0.000008385535,0.000006317811,0.0000069165994,0.016015679,0.00001799129,0.00002076395,0.002487518,0.12104162,0.00012810751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019397172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072868913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11971908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043297572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026385655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45041317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167249882","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdaf064","title":"Estimating Welfare Effects in a Non-Parametric Choice Model: The Case of School Vouchers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Voucher; Welfare; Nonparametric statistics; School choice; Econometrics; Economics; Public economics","score_opus":0.03914850636367504,"score_gpt":0.367002511202089,"score_spread":0.3278540048384139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167249882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69676465,0.28628466,0.00017910445,0.004393353,0.0005198958,0.0013481062,0.000009144587,0.00001457592,0.010486504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9243006,0.07449232,0.000569993,0.00039569745,0.000036014924,0.000072065755,3.2930288e-7,0.000005333444,0.00012763671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989539,0.00022725464,0.00044060143,0.000145451,0.000054613683,0.00017819548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805707,0.0013087636,0.0002561307,0.00028748784,0.000069153684,0.000021404776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001912874,0.00010805888,0.00049689866,0.00007499323,0.0002872662,0.000010183593,0.00034231643,0.000032221476,0.0000053189056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023944569,0.00006550849,0.00011405989,0.00045835442,0.0003016954,0.000059664388,0.00012067124,0.00011868162,0.0000042839],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037709244,0.00035450037,0.097341,0.08255343,0.0033345574,0.000044876873,0.09496835,0.17109081,0.000012472548,0.36484906,0.015040923,0.1703723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031845733,0.0002246986,0.07523007,0.044566974,0.002678727,0.000020211899,0.2234421,0.58056295,0.00002069871,0.06290546,0.005744723,0.0014188009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00287071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028059315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40947214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018014308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014599068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43396738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167691247","doi":"10.3390/jrfm14060265","title":"Examining Low-Income Single-Mother Families’ Experiences with Family Benefit Packages during and after the Great Recession in the United States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute for Research on Labor and Employment","keywords":"Recession; Welfare; Poverty; Subsidy; Income Support; Single mothers; Economics; Low income; Social security; Work (physics); Great recession; Economic mobility; Cash; Demographic economics; Business; Labour economics; Economic growth; Finance; Psychology; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.011674915281000297,"score_gpt":0.2302954196900889,"score_spread":0.21862050440908862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167691247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996962,0.0013793318,0.0005773129,0.00018488163,0.00016316393,0.00011127181,0.0000029772866,0.000005069466,0.00061400526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98297936,0.016201448,0.00030029262,0.0002755984,0.00010832239,0.000009939114,8.125595e-7,0.0000070216583,0.00011722956],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998826,0.00019522436,0.00024502928,0.00014824221,0.00036479888,0.00022070252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994567,0.00013332997,0.0001685905,0.00011030235,0.00008451713,0.0000465817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007078121,0.00011754572,0.00016320543,0.00013230188,0.0004655832,0.00019349562,0.00017076201,0.00004091366,0.000006556953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004631759,0.00006329066,0.000027147451,0.00052829226,0.00021408337,0.00017873774,0.00006809066,0.00018557196,2.5413976e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019700838,0.00008322586,0.6194074,0.000047918158,0.000022684788,0.000344753,0.35027823,0.00019071394,0.000016179616,0.0007319509,0.00002313903,0.02865676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031759898,0.000058028483,0.59948486,0.00014022557,0.000024725672,0.0000058344585,0.39733905,0.000015558526,0.0000034349093,0.0005157224,0.0020232361,0.00007172891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037224387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019748814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047060803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035989913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026667003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35809368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168494039","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3727133","title":"Asymmetric Demand Response When Prices Increase and Decrease: The Case of Child Healthcare","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Demand response; Business; Economics; Engineering; Economic growth","score_opus":0.01267674864856667,"score_gpt":0.2726001122171389,"score_spread":0.25992336356857226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168494039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9408927,0.024950642,0.0011357298,0.03190136,0.00007046446,0.00021817216,0.000012428333,0.000022468219,0.00079603144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837954,0.014330496,0.00008919768,0.001407549,0.00026737983,0.000002636443,0.0000011739871,0.000013158481,0.000093009374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971614,0.0009030191,0.00028164033,0.00018994199,0.00026547804,0.0011985318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868745,0.00038067755,0.00022262112,0.00012650125,0.00015435192,0.0004283956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004637271,0.00012652436,0.0001939283,0.00011289822,0.0010828327,0.00008352205,0.00030277498,0.0000937219,0.000012345579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014889884,0.00009295015,0.00007690302,0.0006248077,0.00020332604,0.00016403188,0.000052515577,0.0010706525,0.0000022892846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025673832,0.00025627392,0.08232071,0.00010586435,0.0005976937,0.0005703122,0.09834669,0.000054143376,0.00009111836,0.75898564,0.0011335838,0.05497056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004558869,0.0029317182,0.0667149,0.00011664271,0.00051037536,0.009851336,0.56323195,0.0014240487,0.000026832626,0.31042656,0.03913803,0.0010687156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004976168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015864503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46488526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027580757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035230983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88527644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170210969","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v13n6p165","title":"Gender, Employment, and Domestic and External Savings in Guatemala","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Balance of payments; Economics; Balance (ability); Balance of trade; Originality; Payment; Demographic economics; Labour economics; International economics; Political science; Psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.02429583652473305,"score_gpt":0.28805941232549576,"score_spread":0.2637635758007627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170210969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944557,0.003103651,0.00015144337,0.0009114429,0.0004953452,0.00002383545,0.000008207072,0.0000010805617,0.00084929843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93697625,0.061351243,0.0010399194,0.00022826523,0.0001391232,6.010082e-7,5.607103e-7,0.000004087945,0.00025997093],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994448,0.000024760406,0.0002574719,0.0001012563,0.00006716032,0.00010457232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956465,0.00006765547,0.00016854693,0.00003396887,0.0001196275,0.000045555666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031851986,0.000059827165,0.0001303101,0.00007067508,0.000056977708,0.00013097117,0.00010583668,0.000042431362,0.0000066443063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006445117,0.0000637993,0.00002352,0.000031174695,0.00009952836,0.00022921135,0.0000521405,0.000094421404,4.3473554e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056601933,0.00010494152,0.5973575,0.000011498823,0.000081411046,0.00029772506,0.012561081,0.00079967425,0.00015458788,0.35877827,0.00006571135,0.029730964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014543979,0.0000515804,0.88484967,0.00010470631,0.000014691591,0.00040917768,0.0039268555,0.0025616356,0.000019813926,0.08846911,0.01793752,0.00020085782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013542523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052545674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28749213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057312292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001473449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.260166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170557416","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3642893","title":"Intertemporal Collective Household Models: Identification in Short Panels with Unobserved Heterogeneity in Resource Shares","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Economics; Econometrics; Resource (disambiguation); Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07128190648688891,"score_gpt":0.2788023400941296,"score_spread":0.20752043360724065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170557416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918266,0.00055308745,0.0053490973,0.001047659,0.00005263906,0.00030575445,0.0000102579215,0.00004251411,0.0008124228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854887,0.0008180458,0.000035091616,0.0002274979,0.000120448334,0.000016117729,0.000009259006,0.000025440317,0.00019924261],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969503,0.00041897732,0.0004109897,0.0003407606,0.0004382572,0.0014406659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994962,0.000043418488,0.00010044783,0.00012663812,0.00008799882,0.00014524735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001824054,0.00016413473,0.00024419962,0.00015492349,0.00026426942,0.00014427965,0.00046201717,0.00012403529,0.0000035397263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007684651,0.00015518663,0.000069902584,0.0009140277,0.0000996113,0.00045830515,0.000039670846,0.0013143297,0.0000020314296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076064357,0.00037421344,0.8507705,0.00002375787,0.00020458108,0.000060829105,0.08347184,0.028570905,0.000969013,0.03229905,0.00012933303,0.0023653284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00426206,0.0014093044,0.45420086,0.00020386493,0.00009996578,0.00007759571,0.34914428,0.038134612,0.0002910609,0.14978904,0.0009362256,0.0014511192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013101344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11988523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39656964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019479558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003095694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89617455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176194940","doi":"10.3138/jcfs-52-2-005","title":"Couples’ Relative Education and the Division of Domestic Work in France, Spain, and the United States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Earnings; Normative; Unpaid work; Negotiation; Inequality; Demographic economics; Sociology; Socioeconomic status; Economics; Work (physics); Gender studies; Political science; Population; Demography; Social science","score_opus":0.041820360423837695,"score_gpt":0.35674832431087966,"score_spread":0.314927963887042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176194940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9174169,0.07860545,0.00039530717,0.0023511928,0.00029969943,0.00016997311,0.0000024724466,0.0000021058752,0.00075692503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95620114,0.042905506,0.00026029002,0.0003256965,0.00005288672,0.0000050956633,0.000001122412,0.0000029235562,0.00024534814],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811655,0.0009589387,0.00040551226,0.00009138524,0.00030633595,0.000121301426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949781,0.0034645973,0.00041221068,0.00007268275,0.0010376378,0.000034800258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016637096,0.00010097393,0.0004779712,0.00009570204,0.00035599642,0.000040061386,0.000110345325,0.000031771535,0.0000010015999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063349673,0.000052461688,0.00005117737,0.0007659587,0.0018958077,0.00013523962,0.00006090634,0.0002333379,2.8428047e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003803643,0.0001652554,0.245316,0.00003167878,0.00046478247,0.0000055641203,0.67049897,0.0016646909,0.000012641491,0.07946328,0.0013865958,0.0006101586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001654215,0.0000375986,0.53274095,0.00019749161,0.000055071803,0.0000014194532,0.44121754,0.00029551852,0.0000010753769,0.021934496,0.001810753,0.000053887346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021403891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029372622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28742492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039023653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020595537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6985182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177171914","doi":"10.5040/9781474207188.ch-002","title":"Family and Household: A Century of Bedrooms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.02589451149943614,"score_gpt":0.26841945421005226,"score_spread":0.24252494271061611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177171914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002905885,0.008419586,0.00014626562,0.000043719767,0.00064630696,0.00015369737,0.00007168314,0.00009552022,0.98751736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010256295,0.02484539,0.0013869165,0.00033885482,0.0003418107,0.0000043175937,0.000030426985,0.00015338756,0.9626426],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990534,0.000070759364,0.00013278743,0.00023956016,0.0002845211,0.00021892998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955577,0.000028953842,0.000093883864,0.00019506612,0.00003102657,0.00009531848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013669563,0.00013462422,0.00026728376,0.00009867078,0.00006145319,0.000030016674,0.00016257378,0.00033551131,0.000862366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022005297,0.00012599287,0.00006107527,0.00019451308,0.00022926906,0.000016263692,0.000056452303,0.000101643,0.000003933219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004715681,0.00021109986,0.041968886,0.00039044555,0.00027505244,0.000033717268,0.013013081,0.0000018642678,0.00017166625,0.13771996,0.7978852,0.008324305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014454748,0.000010964025,0.008530057,0.0000770603,0.000025650326,3.2377773e-7,0.0151448855,0.000003860308,5.9875424e-7,0.00022558642,0.97564375,0.00019270972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012509982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009027282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17775854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020829515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019412364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185583478","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3896797","title":"Welfare versus Work Under a Negative Income Tax: Evidence from the Gary, Seattle, Denver and Manitoba Income Maintenance Experiments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Economics; Work (physics); Labour economics; Income tax; Demographic economics; Public economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.025878286805349954,"score_gpt":0.2878671748623964,"score_spread":0.26198888805704645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185583478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98083586,0.010274298,0.0016301118,0.0053429366,0.0009008344,0.00016682383,0.000010320375,0.000028106637,0.00081072684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804135,0.017165093,0.00020634246,0.00030198976,0.00048499356,0.000010125374,0.0000028345976,0.00002247716,0.0013926295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996463,0.0005572284,0.00026513753,0.00035620463,0.00060775306,0.0017506932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986333,0.0005160189,0.000173318,0.0002700856,0.0002345575,0.00017268608],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011641765,0.00021029214,0.00022132753,0.000039161034,0.0014075759,0.00036040597,0.00057875743,0.00013438842,0.000080138336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040808093,0.0001635946,0.00010501165,0.0005119663,0.00033811855,0.00062938826,0.00017822185,0.0013822308,0.000019084853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007189844,0.00016389166,0.6454451,0.000010958799,0.0012021317,0.0001250519,0.035772953,0.00014218099,0.00019176332,0.3087455,0.00039221623,0.0070892805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002083148,0.00018474025,0.42285383,0.0002532727,0.00012566485,0.000051371117,0.44160023,0.000055807133,0.000032777425,0.13058218,0.0016659128,0.0005110537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046515646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06907131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40582728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016898877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021893347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188951520","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3822013","title":"Partisan Fertility and Presidential Elections","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Political science; Fertility; Politics; Law; Demography; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.012312743682857591,"score_gpt":0.27829097506893125,"score_spread":0.2659782313860737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3188951520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827199,0.0039134645,0.005375022,0.0012723098,0.0004429957,0.000065240114,0.0000022479824,0.000038790593,0.0061700433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98659617,0.0070931762,0.00006808968,0.000081666665,0.0002905241,0.000002564809,0.000002145511,0.000008777102,0.005856892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975435,0.00027223417,0.00017641451,0.00018352273,0.00027937346,0.0015449298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948853,0.000041189913,0.00006042939,0.0001044794,0.00016269488,0.00014268281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012065009,0.00008450051,0.00011293554,0.000039715007,0.0010792122,0.00017339466,0.00012788776,0.000087198685,0.00008290919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018498978,0.00008791225,0.00007047084,0.0002602101,0.0001237051,0.00021328084,0.000029584822,0.0009027538,0.000009141953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045239543,0.00022281894,0.2917263,0.000008568279,0.00028028793,0.000021719343,0.009732486,0.000030517154,0.0013407844,0.680817,0.00045173278,0.015322536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005513653,0.00010252797,0.310426,0.000008273617,0.00008472065,0.00013528319,0.047802866,0.000089275345,0.00007319923,0.6314156,0.009061259,0.00024966028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084254314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07332386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07248132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004490191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044682575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9435856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189773310","doi":"","title":"Intertemporal Collective Household Models: Identification in Short Panels with Unobserved Heterogeneity in Resource Shares","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Bristol","keywords":"Econometrics; Economics; Monotonic function; Nonparametric statistics; Variable (mathematics); Identification (biology); Econometric model; Distribution (mathematics); Function (biology); Panel data; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15766412658896534,"score_gpt":0.34437751158940383,"score_spread":0.1867133850004385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189773310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9756052,0.00009493273,0.0000343499,0.00046540663,0.00016422522,0.0016749962,0.00019279923,0.00006477448,0.021703351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957871,0.0026224626,0.00018401009,0.000091692265,0.000113999406,0.00045744746,0.00015355616,0.00007263023,0.0005171461],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948394,0.0012692661,0.0009336075,0.001435725,0.0005597336,0.0009622823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825156,0.0003819357,0.00015818517,0.00078917,0.00015499986,0.00026412873],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035032837,0.0003599336,0.0006971865,0.0007450468,0.00024283206,0.00038003764,0.0012945781,0.0006357416,0.000008446582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040625362,0.00040879042,0.00013214242,0.00075856596,0.00053851225,0.00030218106,0.00083994097,0.0020372558,0.0000021995677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006746562,0.00053072924,0.6932487,0.00025561833,0.00014200577,0.0001679438,0.055463474,0.24013232,0.0001639729,0.0010606702,0.000068764784,0.008091164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016868681,0.00023096192,0.7406774,0.00080610765,0.00002113648,0.0000030182423,0.07915792,0.16095643,0.00012689797,0.013021001,0.001826714,0.0014855064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004985985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14399718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13901119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003810829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023736062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191406191","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3773746","title":"Class, Social Mobility, and Voting: Evidence from Historical Voting Records","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Class (philosophy); Political science; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Politics","score_opus":0.03017237468016513,"score_gpt":0.29197673554403764,"score_spread":0.2618043608638725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191406191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9739835,0.01124555,0.0067606145,0.005408324,0.0011083895,0.000080109625,0.0000032510084,0.000054014206,0.0013562012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98765045,0.00715187,0.00027289492,0.00014741921,0.0018182922,0.0000022341637,0.00000246517,0.000017673523,0.002936724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963834,0.00051999884,0.00034998017,0.000358363,0.0005484206,0.0018398167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896705,0.00031489538,0.00018384556,0.00009733535,0.00026953916,0.00016734593],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002951241,0.0001517998,0.0002567106,0.00004791644,0.0013953863,0.00019496027,0.00029480422,0.00019714769,0.00004635008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009773844,0.00015973728,0.00013221712,0.0003332045,0.00013386518,0.0003264111,0.00009019081,0.0017601105,0.000007646561],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049152946,0.00020600397,0.6630767,0.000015628904,0.00019994067,0.000038060563,0.02149002,0.00001606568,0.00078741746,0.27888066,0.0012630555,0.033977315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019197298,0.0004841208,0.24564773,0.00021434829,0.00039493275,0.0002460592,0.1729803,0.0020190475,0.000040593237,0.53242666,0.042041056,0.001585455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004034818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058078486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41742894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043895883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053882366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191571247","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3679710","title":"The EITC and Maternal Time Use: More Time Working and Less Time with Kids?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Time-out; Psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.01162785578512645,"score_gpt":0.23171527972365913,"score_spread":0.22008742393853267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191571247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905674,0.0020684695,0.0003162504,0.005086273,0.000050841132,0.00012998078,0.0000031177383,0.000043536354,0.0017341531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866289,0.0050777113,0.000079337384,0.0003939714,0.00046974662,0.0000018255117,0.000001711368,0.000026807269,0.0073200264],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976514,0.00014468134,0.0001738434,0.0002093689,0.00038518067,0.0014355326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994011,0.00010505008,0.00012422599,0.00008566556,0.00006762405,0.0002163317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010285785,0.00015444479,0.00017492885,0.00003003701,0.0011757123,0.0005448941,0.00027471682,0.00008148196,0.000025897702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046672354,0.0001050386,0.0000365019,0.0001930136,0.00031181535,0.00025086908,0.000055637112,0.0008928533,0.00003164067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009654234,0.00011402401,0.655622,0.000029462402,0.0015075544,0.00013272214,0.05322145,0.00022256885,0.004204901,0.16544555,0.0020085673,0.116525754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012358947,0.0045961207,0.3511814,0.0006769513,0.0013615382,0.0036559033,0.18768977,0.06258544,0.00010346493,0.23531014,0.13503256,0.0054477714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025031998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076067226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30444062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019322276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094518275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9042748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193407002","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v13i1.70275","title":"Economic Policy Trends: The Domestic Violence Crisis and COVID-19: Can Short Term Rentals Help?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Renting; Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Term (time); Isolation (microbiology); Business; Political science; Medicine; Virology; Disease; Law; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.05131441258637442,"score_gpt":0.3650142979262459,"score_spread":0.3136998853398715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193407002","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14788945,0.0003003324,0.00069920666,0.8202913,0.00009803264,0.0004916364,0.00057762593,0.00021050159,0.029441966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790764,0.0013158226,0.00007723939,0.017376723,0.0010726548,0.00012859904,0.000048320137,0.000021766207,0.00088246143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759376,0.0005046889,0.00048121758,0.00040705182,0.00037203095,0.00064124126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710625,0.00038756867,0.00023393164,0.0007909725,0.00016441879,0.0013168736],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001298414,0.0002082613,0.0002601698,0.0004742812,0.0013440443,0.0005735838,0.001702439,0.00012111268,0.00026114084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046815714,0.00014923564,0.00012883893,0.0021719923,0.0011283467,0.0005250641,0.0002729147,0.0002831672,0.000042440894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004322064,0.00006272106,0.09143614,0.000017963668,0.00009959412,2.9878373e-7,0.016612843,0.000056113397,0.00005209859,0.8439479,0.043317784,0.004392241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006114343,0.000082566396,0.71917224,0.0000133575895,0.00012694765,0.000017268418,0.043745764,0.0005293481,0.000007657618,0.06602199,0.16910361,0.00056780607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032012686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073819985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83118695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059381535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062205205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198094718","doi":"","title":"Pathways to Higher Education for Native Hawaiian Individual Development Account Participants","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Native Hawaiians; Graduation (instrument); Indigenous; Receipt; Unemployment; Asset (computer security); Welfare; Psychological intervention; Demographic economics; Gerontology; Psychology; Sociology; Demography; Economic growth; Economics; Medicine; Population; Accounting; Ecology","score_opus":0.09119342042541945,"score_gpt":0.3319038858377854,"score_spread":0.24071046541236596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198094718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93997175,0.000023308367,0.000902908,0.0020008255,0.0012036962,0.0010676907,0.000012360866,0.00007829775,0.05473915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97373325,0.0000048176234,0.010556524,0.0024776598,0.00022719763,0.00061917247,0.000021302541,0.000010409028,0.01234969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998815,0.000040687122,0.00018111286,0.00020986867,0.00031131026,0.00044204036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925,0.00007039684,0.000046198573,0.00009864606,0.0003052362,0.00022950795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034878487,0.0000983541,0.00010050735,0.0000654612,0.0004174365,0.0001563556,0.00022254509,0.000080374346,0.0005617111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000707182,0.00008690065,0.00002662725,0.00020343815,0.0000441234,0.00023285125,0.000039723138,0.000042922056,0.0002829304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008803664,0.00060612883,0.07066321,0.000022325556,0.00009423538,2.2642638e-7,0.3092256,0.000015905078,0.0001969191,0.49840465,0.06297239,0.05778962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001923922,0.00004672383,0.6971549,0.000011220992,0.000013350417,4.093717e-8,0.0789222,0.000019628405,0.000079650854,0.01119555,0.21208413,0.0002802075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001191608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017963692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6264917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017736439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010039958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6150342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199080841","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Full-Day Kindergarten on Maternal Labour Supply","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Absenteeism; Margin (machine learning); Demographic economics; Immigration; Day care; Labour economics; Economics; Psychology; Demography; Business; Medicine; Geography; Nursing; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.018669216799039184,"score_gpt":0.32475386192463745,"score_spread":0.3060846451255983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199080841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8750713,0.000023436072,4.2418276e-7,0.00029659423,0.00026460367,0.0003053962,0.00003453166,0.000012540547,0.123991214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874062,0.0034959195,0.00002964082,0.000033865374,0.00012925648,0.000014386497,0.0000037074237,0.000019936342,0.008867105],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978645,0.000432166,0.00030022988,0.00029316772,0.00035111592,0.00075886236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983739,0.0007930558,0.00009810649,0.00045605132,0.00012721181,0.0001516418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028872779,0.00012274411,0.00021009936,0.00014467676,0.00033257704,0.00013348878,0.0006652186,0.00014536732,0.00023206607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002859574,0.00009213678,0.00013147398,0.00019234438,0.00037307176,0.000116999494,0.00009697241,0.00040938606,0.00006861261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017665057,0.00011941108,0.9179187,0.000014490323,0.00008833866,0.0000069600273,0.005677303,0.004012436,0.00087418867,0.02500646,0.00016034934,0.04594475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006513972,0.00035677195,0.9670693,0.00003352853,0.0000020783955,0.000001973881,0.014250339,0.0021537242,0.00004757622,0.0025854043,0.012645318,0.00020254038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022905369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032012362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115124114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005916579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062510325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3757229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203141890","doi":"10.3390/jrfm14100469","title":"Gender Differences in Intra-Household Financial Decision-Making: An Application of Coarsened Exact Matching","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining power; Economics; Human capital; Earnings; Matching (statistics); Per capita; Distribution (mathematics); Per capita income; Empowerment; Household income; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Finance; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Statistics","score_opus":0.019316894611859616,"score_gpt":0.26892619461113,"score_spread":0.24960929999927037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203141890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83359104,0.00038726104,0.16496803,0.000024713374,0.0003751626,0.00010928611,0.000007884478,0.000006312452,0.00053028384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98808914,0.0045860345,0.0069912346,0.00008881388,0.0002223526,0.000002788168,0.000001086046,0.000007727041,0.000010796832],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984777,0.00015146201,0.0005262671,0.00018817205,0.000437892,0.00021848804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991213,0.00013505775,0.00039090146,0.00013640303,0.00013660586,0.00007971812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095873873,0.00011303864,0.00030851213,0.00019961956,0.00021373965,0.000062088,0.00022092716,0.000104625506,0.0000065899885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020539337,0.00010565647,0.000076649296,0.00042745826,0.000086213615,0.00022580888,0.00006621839,0.00021034986,4.901571e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017775428,0.00047481342,0.36085016,0.00006399351,0.000020805135,0.0001433392,0.023404479,0.00090075604,0.00007740275,0.08696153,0.00009013133,0.52683485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000491667,0.000057106667,0.9047665,0.00008147111,0.00004568034,0.0000030220267,0.010326286,0.0001807624,0.000004295384,0.0818054,0.0021106817,0.00012715423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024124133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022869278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54391634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065196466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017982656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4308546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203413034","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/vg8h5","title":"World War II, the Baby Boom and Employment: County Level Evidence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Baby boom; Fertility; Boom; World War II; Demography; Demographic economics; Total fertility rate; First world war; Geography; Economics; Political science; Population; History; Sociology; Family planning; Engineering; Law; Research methodology","score_opus":0.08655467701541925,"score_gpt":0.3518289166940763,"score_spread":0.26527423967865704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203413034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88040787,0.0016075162,0.0000045707206,0.0046522524,0.0003594996,0.0003406034,0.000039964012,0.000028082277,0.112559624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91731924,0.052601878,0.00024861228,0.0006494602,0.00022941938,0.000044354867,0.000005556777,0.000021432994,0.028880062],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771875,0.00044925883,0.00028307346,0.00047137853,0.00037602746,0.0007015376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978937,0.0012370059,0.00005554386,0.0004649795,0.00016641122,0.0001823946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002961597,0.00012551031,0.00019434097,0.00011154433,0.0012084739,0.00017310362,0.00046841998,0.00010652133,0.000121806625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010743052,0.0001126604,0.00005820168,0.00038796483,0.0007605474,0.00025674846,0.00035816108,0.0004939196,0.0000072958046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001168514,0.00042484907,0.54670376,0.00009368403,0.00018552726,0.00015152144,0.08516419,0.00093438744,0.0006334834,0.06673427,0.003282694,0.29557475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074401725,0.00009653498,0.24609347,0.00020539784,0.000017274226,0.0000095210735,0.10478896,0.0030394818,0.000077266006,0.007294045,0.63704646,0.00058757974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010447976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053066123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63376373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005039877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009030451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96421295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204559142","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v22i4.2911","title":"Happy 45th Anniversary to the Earned Income Tax Credit. Thoughts on One of the Most Expensive Costing Credits in the U.S. Tax Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Tax credit; Presidential system; Legislature; Work (physics); Income tax; Economics; Legislative history; Tax law; Law; Tax reform; Accounting; Labour economics; Business; Public economics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.028902008143003248,"score_gpt":0.23633084726542447,"score_spread":0.20742883912242122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204559142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97742474,0.000058291345,0.00010156857,0.01402089,0.0005500234,0.00031222418,0.000033129694,0.000003809857,0.0074953143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936461,0.00037343855,0.0001799965,0.0042396937,0.00152872,0.000003271754,0.0000011217464,0.000010712196,0.00001697338],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989853,0.000067020024,0.00039216643,0.0001470407,0.00020076972,0.0002077246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885154,0.0002587614,0.00047270747,0.00015546849,0.00017390432,0.000087600034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072911,0.00012356664,0.0002895279,0.000044108376,0.00042702456,0.0001197703,0.0005892082,0.0000851044,0.000005922141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012985004,0.00007254832,0.000054930842,0.00040572716,0.00022091488,0.00016048555,0.00010715364,0.00028855418,0.0000024834117],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023540207,0.00068473,0.030940993,0.00021124978,0.00043094103,0.000057100355,0.43370384,0.1410352,0.0016078905,0.35968453,0.016754247,0.012535245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036387094,0.00046304456,0.47768724,0.00037130923,0.00020888902,0.000020959682,0.36345574,0.0031629843,0.0003041441,0.01666178,0.13314342,0.00088177953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040113408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015220094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44674623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006360311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001885942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3284371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205272812","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2020-137","title":"How Did the Canada Child Benefit Affect Household Spending?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Renting; Recreation; Demographic economics; Consumer spending; Health spending; Agricultural economics; Household income; Economics; Affect (linguistics); Low income; Business; Labour economics; Socioeconomics; Health care; Economic growth; Geography; Psychology; Health insurance; Political science","score_opus":0.024299443593667217,"score_gpt":0.24143621429760725,"score_spread":0.21713677070394005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205272812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34768632,0.0007421018,0.000009622574,0.3316399,0.0015041161,0.00028697963,0.0007920811,0.0000808558,0.31725803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97068566,0.00016642362,0.000012702696,0.0127223795,0.0014822148,0.000012372406,0.000048261132,0.000028405573,0.014841578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976999,0.00014011588,0.00012712117,0.0003144795,0.00044565438,0.0012727362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783736,0.00008921425,0.000059476424,0.0005003278,0.00011755483,0.001396059],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034254155,0.00017493925,0.00017521787,0.00019968011,0.0018395834,0.0008910854,0.0007235131,0.00013628438,0.000095242285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008236691,0.0001582569,0.00008587858,0.0014084162,0.00020756635,0.0002404352,0.000053013744,0.0002814556,0.000007657448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.6124973e-7,0.000009814376,0.063491404,0.00000651853,0.00004885263,0.00009565393,0.0020654728,0.0000069427106,0.0000031559057,0.8578437,0.073110975,0.0033171591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010573212,0.0000042572447,0.14493121,0.0000058255455,0.000008906463,0.000012704974,0.005822677,0.0000125137385,0.000004033079,0.0011624848,0.8477195,0.00021019022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8566812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021884171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028257113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208456935","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3623323","title":"Spousal Insurance, Outside Options and Wage Bargaining","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Business; Labour economics; Economics; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.016749006315500366,"score_gpt":0.2655410261845197,"score_spread":0.24879201986901933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208456935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95645195,0.003934799,0.0074826186,0.0035989925,0.0002504823,0.00011848939,0.000008006833,0.00008396975,0.028070714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841497,0.013678596,0.00026017768,0.00061510905,0.0006360195,0.0000016213547,0.0000017765068,0.000014885211,0.0006420985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977534,0.0001383785,0.0001860084,0.00016946137,0.0002668243,0.0014859557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951506,0.000045499088,0.00008235153,0.000061140236,0.00007045633,0.00022552196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010862409,0.00010559703,0.00014264348,0.000048357502,0.00078218133,0.00011762257,0.00021134217,0.00008060988,0.000020392292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014542016,0.000103579325,0.000059623635,0.00025977028,0.0001218856,0.00023985986,0.00003031812,0.0011391507,0.00002102728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020003497,0.000024639701,0.107040755,0.0000027248004,0.00007560329,0.000010586146,0.017677618,0.00009706453,0.00021196529,0.86710393,0.00010498844,0.0076301415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024034537,0.0006857597,0.17078294,0.000036659727,0.00010303159,0.00018664754,0.30197373,0.0011671291,0.000008489676,0.49266058,0.029084578,0.00090702146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020567753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002325225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37444332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025413765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017768211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60159856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209762429","doi":"","title":"A Critique of Gender Ideology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Landas Journal of Loyola School of Theology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Identity (music); Gender identity; Gender studies; Register (sociolinguistics); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.021814755113325982,"score_gpt":0.32531612292647766,"score_spread":0.3035013678131517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209762429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9588644,0.0007350618,0.0066619925,0.0009101344,0.0012593697,0.000083177576,0.000009183598,0.000009228508,0.031467456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99486405,0.0004509307,0.0029372852,0.0005407968,0.000725187,6.907362e-7,6.6767035e-7,0.000010531956,0.0004698763],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798656,0.0005983158,0.0006713656,0.00012023926,0.00030010173,0.0003234369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975875,0.0002922952,0.00066958234,0.0001919204,0.0010820192,0.00017665664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017680344,0.00011126883,0.00050194573,0.00022406851,0.000103591476,0.000008517211,0.0005689542,0.00026003292,0.00088155566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010719335,0.00009094888,0.00017339019,0.0002186847,0.0011757753,0.00015515737,0.00006370766,0.0002970562,0.000018284094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039032177,0.00017424361,0.7964491,0.000040514413,0.00026027978,0.00004502894,0.011871403,0.000026865524,0.004640735,0.18109705,0.0047027576,0.00030168652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028618183,0.0022256712,0.49165684,0.00009142149,0.0002492666,0.00035675874,0.012680084,0.000041821244,0.0016003537,0.4718488,0.01601639,0.00037078132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032126807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056541874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30479226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041324205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057403016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9652417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210443208","doi":"10.1920/wp.ifs.2020.620","title":"OLS estimation of the intra-household distribution of expenditure","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Engel curve; Econometrics; Estimation; Economics; Poverty; Resource distribution; Distribution (mathematics); Resource (disambiguation); Representation (politics); Identification (biology); Resource allocation; Mathematics; Economic growth; Computer science","score_opus":0.04521116512262465,"score_gpt":0.30638793238523054,"score_spread":0.2611767672626059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210443208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13383688,0.0012414644,0.05376068,0.003555789,0.011816175,0.0030183513,0.0033765303,0.0003929093,0.7890012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99611515,0.0009565193,0.00016679445,0.000033705597,0.0002922652,0.0000070369365,0.0003293191,0.000013603437,0.0020856112],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998029,0.00011314143,0.0004189776,0.00019035941,0.0010850767,0.00016345247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998827,0.00006656101,0.0005144634,0.00026317677,0.00027109715,0.000057720386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051394536,0.00013466539,0.0003123703,0.000024319466,0.00014212068,0.000021527883,0.00037835742,0.0003869663,0.000055008717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055190554,0.00009569791,0.00017753534,0.00030164258,0.00024124295,0.000067638335,0.00006391239,0.00023936394,0.000002062696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046104313,0.000636155,0.08840364,0.0026496642,0.0006533253,0.000009255109,0.051954143,0.009270321,0.00056605996,0.25322846,0.57043266,0.022150204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092054263,0.00022611392,0.4846532,0.0010757926,0.0010122351,0.000009243493,0.06368573,0.0040809144,0.0013856377,0.016662536,0.42459875,0.0016892964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038644522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011622861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8622783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021076933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014891028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58419216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210498949","doi":"","title":"GENDER RELATIONS: GENDER DIFFERENCES, DIVISIONS AND INEQUALITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TRAILS: Teaching Resources and Innovations Library for Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Gender studies; Gender inequality; Gender relations; Sociology; Social inequality; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0564361796884422,"score_gpt":0.31289169533576516,"score_spread":0.25645551564732294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210498949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98057866,0.00033295713,0.003959449,0.003423275,0.00031592807,0.0003366169,0.00014876088,0.00020198584,0.010702369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98781866,0.00013555019,0.009481546,0.0009946788,0.00037218953,0.000049976312,0.00015398236,0.000023762272,0.00096967473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984399,0.0002945019,0.0003835015,0.00036992587,0.0001352106,0.00037692505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863005,0.00084795663,0.00014882337,0.00019286519,0.000059021062,0.000121289864],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009937843,0.00016953357,0.00023924383,0.00017968213,0.0024349447,0.00016236956,0.00022312801,0.00037901665,0.00010264248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048130075,0.00015359941,0.000057846235,0.00021859018,0.0010121542,0.0006076499,0.000093525654,0.00071347854,0.000002165571],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000440245,0.000039409162,0.30023062,0.000013092286,0.000028014347,1.7056828e-7,0.05990422,9.775804e-7,0.00010823182,0.6363327,0.001247003,0.0020911794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035337638,0.000047737478,0.6871093,0.0000050039416,0.000025843801,0.00000180919,0.0254887,0.00040481729,5.256619e-7,0.18506536,0.10126945,0.00022805328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013133229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007326981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4512673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001114879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012124084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99886376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210773372","doi":"","title":"FEMINIST PERSPECTIVES ON GENDER AND SEXUALITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TRAILS: Teaching Resources and Innovations Library for Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Heterosexuality; Gender studies; Homosexuality; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.036328456248736055,"score_gpt":0.31891856107193645,"score_spread":0.2825901048232004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210773372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95436156,0.00018138044,0.00024384909,0.0034775196,0.000211057,0.00022771356,0.00010138507,0.00014960497,0.04104595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931421,0.00007154228,0.003705603,0.0013959049,0.00053672673,0.000025928683,0.00004991687,0.000019879379,0.0010523752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988992,0.00017525774,0.00021058686,0.00033525436,0.00009155394,0.0002881034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915236,0.00050186994,0.00009371726,0.00014165949,0.0000315449,0.00007886988],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077692734,0.00013220117,0.00017711379,0.00011751347,0.0017259995,0.00013270235,0.00016338276,0.00025761835,0.000038267448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026301865,0.0001224592,0.000038845486,0.00012529705,0.0011864324,0.00023640059,0.000044322525,0.0005495604,0.0000011169883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010748269,0.000051246243,0.0400495,0.0000103143375,0.000021385464,2.0452467e-7,0.21143149,4.959915e-7,0.00015993514,0.74570286,0.0012427479,0.0013190806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004343796,0.00016893944,0.16860221,0.0000046168093,0.000017106087,0.0000026252226,0.36978275,0.00011241999,0.0000025787047,0.06727094,0.39334458,0.00025686697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000065974746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021512436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6784319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001067756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007068185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211805927","doi":"10.4324/9781003128151-17","title":"The Economics of Being LGBT. A Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.061210702289780455,"score_gpt":0.3657848725117263,"score_spread":0.3045741702219459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211805927","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.1269963e-7,0.8417998,0.000007612336,0.00025346654,0.00085654133,0.0005264105,0.000016012882,0.000034570043,0.1565054],"genre_scores_gemma":[3.8194278e-7,0.9829589,0.00007584571,0.00016806177,0.00023454113,0.000036134425,0.000010701405,0.000024810826,0.016490584],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985068,0.00022071823,0.00061708514,0.0002410138,0.00014583024,0.0002685565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989742,0.00031125848,0.00023508113,0.00035027615,0.000060947794,0.00006820602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00148081,0.0002013616,0.00097101694,0.000044514938,0.0002555346,0.00009040729,0.000653268,0.00018655274,0.000051504692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014163398,0.00011400248,0.0005945665,0.0003652328,0.00019464457,0.000042817705,0.0001050752,0.0002463732,0.00017055882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.5452108e-8,0.0000035225257,7.5375203e-7,0.024011247,0.00007707843,7.4566964e-7,0.00037030576,3.041438e-8,4.3281667e-10,0.28904364,0.005577946,0.6809147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071940512,0.000004663567,1.3863858e-7,0.017576404,0.00078099896,0.00000104831,0.0005610332,0.0000018710024,7.883684e-10,0.0028996796,0.9780365,0.00013044763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026339403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011463033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9724586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001338857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010495043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46488863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213305492","doi":"10.1080/21620555.2021.1998771","title":"Property in whose name? Intrahousehold bargaining over homeownership in China","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Sociological Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Demographic economics; Socioeconomic status; Wife; Autonomy; Distribution (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Inequality; Housing tenure; Economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Geography; Political science; Demography","score_opus":0.06022535508619389,"score_gpt":0.3388988201303736,"score_spread":0.2786734650441797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213305492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84732735,0.11245961,0.000018806937,0.00405221,0.00023188024,0.0005131565,0.000006263235,0.00009077895,0.03529993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82038665,0.1750476,0.00017962452,0.0034998998,0.00016601844,0.000049098733,0.000019984214,0.000013722367,0.00063740276],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968299,0.0012394157,0.0005198788,0.00049633934,0.00032149034,0.00059297483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911267,0.00029027322,0.000098446864,0.00026663762,0.000065321285,0.00016664028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023637966,0.00023972694,0.0007234764,0.000047150752,0.00017940873,0.000047423597,0.000381549,0.00031164178,0.0004965702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048275297,0.00013555204,0.00019179602,0.0010373838,0.0003214672,0.00016377073,0.00013230497,0.0007161703,0.000048225633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006317617,0.00024895382,0.9630604,0.00043515078,0.000012928204,0.0001891878,0.010373927,0.000014762138,0.00003287758,0.014044699,0.0006263488,0.010954467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043139703,0.000033279313,0.9595509,0.0010907069,0.000014373025,0.000002829801,0.0017815417,0.00007545839,2.2440507e-7,0.02124719,0.015399611,0.00037244955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039317278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010089276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023110826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033149097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5779353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214062051","doi":"10.3968/12265","title":"The Influence of Globalization on the Female Gender: The Igbo Example","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Igbo; Globalization; Ethnic group; Meaning (existential); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Subject (documents); Development economics; Psychology; Law; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03969794135056374,"score_gpt":0.33174575881547425,"score_spread":0.2920478174649105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214062051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83738655,0.00017439587,0.000026416968,0.0042622495,0.0009946997,0.00018593685,0.0000048868474,0.000012901459,0.15695193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99540716,0.00014578286,0.000039286217,0.0008720582,0.00019636439,0.000015974165,0.0000016229893,0.0000036536658,0.0033181107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825627,0.00025510768,0.0002052099,0.00018789814,0.00085366576,0.00024185303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983063,0.0003204703,0.00021431563,0.0002770354,0.00083584845,0.00004606773],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001521504,0.00006786911,0.00007753439,0.000022541946,0.002527566,0.00012605714,0.00078113255,0.000049115883,0.00007973816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035311407,0.00003941626,0.00004844396,0.0016538015,0.002155475,0.00016670153,0.00006403239,0.00008221086,0.000007940357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001438895,0.000054099335,0.00886352,0.000003196859,0.0000034426366,2.79315e-8,0.026282066,0.0000481281,0.00074453454,0.96279997,0.0008123484,0.00038720973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003457827,0.00000832692,0.87241316,0.00000721977,0.000008693605,1.2197964e-7,0.04334449,0.000005707327,0.00020630639,0.016807698,0.067103855,0.000059864175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001285601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001316674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9459923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000128865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020912837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215788054","doi":"10.1093/ej/ueab085","title":"Intrahousehold Resource Allocation and Individual Poverty: Assessing Collective Model Predictions using Direct Evidence on Sharing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Economics; Poverty; Welfare; Per capita; Inequality; Identification (biology); Econometrics; Clothing; Resource allocation; Engel curve; Public economics; Microeconomics; Aggregate expenditure; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.11771307408687368,"score_gpt":0.31826280587490297,"score_spread":0.2005497317880293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215788054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98268336,0.0003566889,0.0045797406,0.0012637088,0.00035106743,0.0000866425,0.00001169211,0.000027019452,0.010640051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973231,0.0005123912,0.00055862695,0.00049072015,0.00046182369,0.000002098593,0.0000011814153,0.000013118957,0.00063696434],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989922,0.00020666726,0.00021037796,0.00019746732,0.00015787588,0.00023542818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930125,0.0002568975,0.00015143353,0.00013493393,0.00005670708,0.00009875534],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014129349,0.0000881287,0.00012381776,0.00006693164,0.0018254688,0.000716864,0.0002179997,0.00006815231,0.000016667864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001980922,0.00007879891,0.000043261392,0.00012055314,0.00010999856,0.00054275576,0.00007549318,0.00032378946,0.0000021004169],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038036058,0.00006122817,0.051927023,0.000008795815,0.0002590311,0.000011090391,0.08802374,0.841983,0.00077983935,0.012111863,0.002376558,0.0024197567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004917436,0.00004557239,0.051652033,0.00027854266,0.00020346092,0.00012489168,0.050480198,0.8791546,0.000089842804,0.016372504,0.0007773562,0.00032921243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001645521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003471017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037543535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009349283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013059503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216741184","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v13n12p90","title":"Nafta and Mexico’s Economic Growth from a Gender Perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deindustrialization; Economics; Population; Cointegration; Tariff; Demographic economics; Development economics; Labour economics; International economics; Economy; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.01872160967196118,"score_gpt":0.2651752210872994,"score_spread":0.24645361141533823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216741184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852771,0.0020062719,0.00014832095,0.0038008515,0.0011746129,0.00002182051,0.00007345805,0.0000017769776,0.0074957646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559281,0.041690044,0.0012194432,0.00046273688,0.00051042537,5.704859e-7,0.0000024070284,0.0000056531635,0.00018065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994506,0.00002650076,0.0002231,0.00014640404,0.000054056323,0.000099314435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933857,0.00007683003,0.0002030507,0.00004642063,0.00028457533,0.000050562663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018580296,0.00006736586,0.00014239951,0.000050117476,0.00008657661,0.00014172278,0.00016469696,0.00007307967,0.000030463247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057657984,0.00007398636,0.00005326535,0.000017736695,0.0001098577,0.00027713715,0.000050614974,0.00012895324,0.000003168931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029314606,0.0000334166,0.035142805,8.44e-7,0.00017123492,0.000036491296,0.009189844,0.0005403076,0.000011737753,0.953334,0.00028784818,0.0012221512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016186767,0.00005379915,0.21424185,0.00003219321,0.00004099372,0.00010392808,0.027679823,0.006389972,0.00009137257,0.68866897,0.060739025,0.00033940506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007534208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011213657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26466504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020685133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033358563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30170763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W322042547","doi":"","title":"Factors that Influence on Child Care Expenses of Single Mother Families in the U. S.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Child care; Single mothers; Marital status; Quarter (Canadian coin); Single parent; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Earnings; Family income; Child support; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Payment; Demography; Medicine; Family medicine; Demographic economics; Business; Developmental psychology; Finance; Economics; Population; Political science; Environmental health; Accounting","score_opus":0.02553722272260278,"score_gpt":0.23609677809238502,"score_spread":0.21055955536978224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W322042547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932151,0.000099979785,0.0000020033397,0.0007709251,0.00046241266,0.00010850511,0.000020232608,0.00000376177,0.005317086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986846,0.00081831653,0.0000144141895,0.00027386931,0.000103447186,7.855977e-7,0.0000012731356,0.000008573439,0.00009475131],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890745,0.00023513415,0.00033876055,0.00007940775,0.00026937082,0.00016987305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983964,0.00033768924,0.00096713955,0.00013949117,0.00012509462,0.00003416236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006972844,0.000093148046,0.00021300654,0.000103954284,0.00031555415,0.00004373844,0.00047073874,0.000103747276,0.000005158186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036927854,0.000059334863,0.00016283698,0.00014440065,0.00009565197,0.00023113938,0.000020598982,0.00019518787,0.0000011733657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069386147,0.00004953968,0.8850551,0.0000025602812,0.000024078237,3.961937e-7,0.112027705,0.0017975576,0.000019938307,0.00085166073,0.00009072561,0.00007378815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022185057,0.000048435737,0.9097749,0.000018673973,0.0000118546395,9.990467e-7,0.08800566,0.000009525848,0.00011737991,0.0009924523,0.00072851114,0.00006975721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006353425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027966339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024719786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008740136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001503783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24270193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32645261","doi":"10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00325","title":"A Strategy for a Successful Christian Sexual Education Ministry in the African American Church","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bioconjugate Chemistry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Christian ministry; Christianity; Political science; Theology; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0421260103522243,"score_gpt":0.30931930893333076,"score_spread":0.26719329858110646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W32645261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.927039,0.00009155962,0.00004674767,0.00042710223,0.0001245614,0.00037545094,0.00005617697,0.00004035676,0.071799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724,0.00003944732,0.00026925304,0.00026448636,0.00039162152,0.00021838438,0.000058504866,0.000015757072,0.0015025667],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986754,0.00007385833,0.00023988077,0.0003415884,0.00022679848,0.0004424412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992329,0.000073773685,0.00015041184,0.00030851515,0.00010565077,0.00012876211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047702546,0.00016338826,0.00016882372,0.000027978309,0.00026724502,0.00009224642,0.00060039567,0.00012849219,0.00009373807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092373455,0.00014268473,0.00005613043,0.0004005709,0.00056213536,0.0000782411,0.000024669973,0.00016388482,0.0000063785606],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004291883,0.003907862,0.32575914,0.00097431696,0.00017773577,0.000042783337,0.53596574,0.000009033388,0.05508037,0.019697608,0.016641775,0.041314438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044182694,0.000118698954,0.06858892,0.000020376478,0.000037081718,0.0000053782846,0.9022218,0.000040873358,0.0016964399,0.0018932275,0.024452232,0.00048316462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011652729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097420637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36625603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010103432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091259484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W329625139","doi":"","title":"Earning and Caring. (Book Reviews/Comptes Rendus)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Ideology; Presentation (obstetrics); Construct (python library); Vitality; Social science; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.04053547399843921,"score_gpt":0.28335664841247005,"score_spread":0.24282117441403084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W329625139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85529554,0.08277276,0.0001039602,0.007405605,0.0013111403,0.00017394336,0.0000036314111,0.000007932581,0.05292546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992034,0.0045538656,0.00020416541,0.0017506056,0.00021138937,9.124266e-7,3.3958517e-7,0.0000063649068,0.0012383545],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986346,0.0006973378,0.00021129349,0.00006972831,0.00007848419,0.00030859717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991885,0.00015752223,0.00018232534,0.000078867444,0.00009817907,0.00029464148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002030182,0.000068091445,0.00019856215,0.00006387209,0.00091430725,0.000034410765,0.00020341325,0.00012006915,0.00025872074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054220867,0.00004966568,0.000058747395,0.00007096552,0.00090112654,0.00006473851,0.0000056147933,0.0003675669,0.000016246522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003358886,0.000006446674,0.4759626,0.000013493866,0.000089905974,0.00005514526,0.17144187,0.00005251801,0.00003864953,0.31421718,0.03610952,0.0020093035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019822431,0.000059137026,0.055856608,0.000030155583,0.000043629778,0.00006142088,0.022995435,0.000005056881,0.0000011447883,0.023200871,0.8974195,0.00012879213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010628612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08897529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014726337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011509748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W342871414","doi":"","title":"Connecticut's Jobs First Program: An Analysis of Welfare Leavers.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Welfare; Earnings; Quarter (Canadian coin); Survey of Income and Program Participation; Sample (material); Welfare reform; Cash; Food Stamp Program; Demographic economics; Interim; Economics; Labour economics; Business; Political science; Finance; Food stamps; Accounting; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.01932317178825188,"score_gpt":0.2954098280214344,"score_spread":0.2760866562331825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W342871414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8432097,0.00002491654,0.000058317943,0.0007969769,0.00007007634,0.00017403794,0.000015563086,0.0001333742,0.15551706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945089,0.00015077135,0.0007960618,0.00013489864,0.00004526742,0.000008575841,0.000025628895,0.000006740647,0.004323125],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988995,0.000085541586,0.00018826195,0.00022404529,0.00031631705,0.00028629668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942106,0.000041510702,0.000048130114,0.0002410113,0.00010571734,0.00014255993],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000273943,0.00009153066,0.0002260475,0.00016704237,0.00042344054,0.00006170366,0.0002487824,0.0001061724,0.0063580014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032394586,0.000083426254,0.0001433679,0.001715014,0.00020838426,0.00017683851,0.0000115365065,0.000060873,0.00002062855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002510898,0.0006779151,0.7804189,0.00001645017,0.0007361025,0.00000765282,0.041002795,0.0023101803,0.0000053592526,0.11646196,0.00046489583,0.057872724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028646112,0.00017033411,0.7108783,0.0000032120433,0.00065443054,2.1164644e-7,0.07614539,0.008355833,0.0000053827794,0.0002392113,0.20298092,0.00028028895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017086215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091089964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20251602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004934405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005376353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99455035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W344186390","doi":"","title":"Power Relations and Contraceptive Use: Gender Differentials in Bangladesh RAPPORT DE FORCE ET UTILISATION DE CONTRACEPTIF: DIFFÉRENCES DE SEXE AU BANGLADESH","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender relations; Power (physics); Family planning; Fertility; Demography; Sociology; Gender studies; Demographic economics; Population; Research methodology; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.02965488847700056,"score_gpt":0.28476445684895707,"score_spread":0.25510956837195653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W344186390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9412945,0.0005842683,0.0020313414,0.007092075,0.0006843638,0.00052454206,0.00020512668,0.000038179496,0.047545597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99221593,0.000256552,0.00048469708,0.0031639624,0.0002976848,0.000019173696,0.000018048508,0.000016581374,0.0035273486],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957269,0.0006562158,0.00041676417,0.00063158746,0.00056346203,0.0020050926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782485,0.00030390266,0.00020429013,0.00016810435,0.00022370538,0.0012751658],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029572053,0.00030009614,0.00036026113,0.00033524903,0.0019536272,0.00055335375,0.0004960673,0.0005285901,0.0002240046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043910267,0.00035800546,0.00010354064,0.001570623,0.0030125608,0.0013354089,0.000031392523,0.0004862558,0.000010442241],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008727007,0.00007152429,0.5946531,0.000009701415,0.000016632834,0.000035805497,0.19266589,0.000034880435,0.0008169689,0.20632781,0.0007296924,0.0046292734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042392188,0.00005405915,0.90839535,0.00003954503,0.000042626998,0.0000075637804,0.07163899,0.0015892567,0.000008926743,0.013246222,0.0041482407,0.00040530684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.093597315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26927033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31374225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039339582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010229796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36274532","doi":"","title":"Child Care and Economic Development: Markets, Households and Public Policy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of economic development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic growth; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Public policy; Work (physics); Economics; Business; Public economics","score_opus":0.018054835926975436,"score_gpt":0.27397123207475216,"score_spread":0.2559163961477767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36274532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.971377,0.0006783793,0.00028596254,0.0010996856,0.0014488613,0.0000802655,0.0000080236105,0.000013473696,0.025008332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921055,0.0013532792,0.0052222367,0.0003387768,0.00069804053,0.000001728947,0.0000074497702,0.000014941677,0.00025808954],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985976,0.000032326803,0.0006570797,0.00018704789,0.00021299922,0.0003128954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906474,0.00008145737,0.00036008176,0.000060016722,0.0001531046,0.0002806145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010743936,0.00014417605,0.00019274183,0.00038958664,0.00029074232,0.0002499692,0.00039639694,0.00009327517,0.00006874016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056840043,0.00015191604,0.000042989443,0.000037367783,0.00013450407,0.00041412187,0.0001238927,0.00013960848,0.000018906756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012579183,0.00006409063,0.66628325,0.00001670205,0.0006023792,0.00004475999,0.05240024,0.00004452933,0.000009651854,0.036732882,0.00060501345,0.24307072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097005273,0.00002226008,0.59531564,0.000043902037,0.000007092204,0.00009533498,0.013326108,0.000011583295,0.000054044307,0.00050293596,0.38939348,0.00025755647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002774742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004014017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38878846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017792279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021199342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6194957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36473107","doi":"10.2196/38894","title":"Non-marital fertility among Mexican American women: exploring the role of social context","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"JMIR Formative Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences","keywords":"Fertility; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Gender studies; Demography; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Political science; Geography; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.04329048250198373,"score_gpt":0.383958589494404,"score_spread":0.3406681069924202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36473107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93090826,0.00005935823,0.00000302288,0.00011727623,0.00028210777,0.00084238965,0.00007844623,0.00003095787,0.06767818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732816,0.0001129372,0.000005532748,0.00001375876,0.00018509588,0.00091533223,0.00015459354,0.000029409255,0.0012551681],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956473,0.00063899707,0.00046523518,0.00031643047,0.0018940612,0.0010379471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978823,0.0003277557,0.00032163545,0.00026989056,0.0009999622,0.00019847414],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002463501,0.00023782787,0.00048160402,0.0002836893,0.0018853967,0.0001611792,0.0009010494,0.00020070608,0.00007341014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019107526,0.00019269249,0.00019471915,0.0012965162,0.002049343,0.00052799436,0.00010870244,0.0012477498,0.000029530533],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016576154,0.00017798325,0.0077438382,0.00009840078,0.000088990826,0.000001226003,0.9583393,0.0000021535636,0.000039544324,0.00705377,0.00011698968,0.026172066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012998689,0.00011837701,0.36739615,0.000040227158,0.000004165476,2.7937928e-8,0.62752485,0.000027679369,0.000053578406,0.0032531684,0.0013207289,0.00013102923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0163056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021701569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3596523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012110195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012731857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W38952810","doi":"10.7202/013037ar","title":"Conférence François-Albert-Angers 2004","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Compensation (psychology); Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.029769472868035204,"score_gpt":0.25432572691853667,"score_spread":0.22455625405050145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W38952810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74891734,0.008479194,0.0015104243,0.0110413395,0.0051537286,0.00055002316,0.00022977029,0.00017179697,0.22394638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.738511,0.0012710057,0.0010100032,0.004567173,0.0021461733,0.00004231549,0.00006790143,0.00006193508,0.25232247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680144,0.0004319073,0.0007120159,0.0007285711,0.00019348429,0.0011325672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980963,0.0005410896,0.000306349,0.0005353066,0.0001724844,0.00034850306],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007397058,0.0004690686,0.00056377467,0.000105856496,0.0005028231,0.00023919699,0.0006626256,0.0007287087,0.0017264555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113120666,0.00053891,0.00029291015,0.0004755185,0.0012030685,0.0005897797,0.00008321369,0.00044748164,0.0012644046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001829958,0.00027725584,0.026323725,0.00007775061,0.00008729658,0.000025303323,0.011733616,0.0007697887,0.00019047761,0.9279388,0.027163794,0.0053938646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067301915,0.00008198957,0.02113135,0.00007618537,0.00008453128,0.0000078784415,0.00490488,0.0007967646,0.00014715927,0.05375272,0.91747457,0.00086895656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091357276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026254829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89031076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041058517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006785532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W395603784","doi":"","title":"You do have choices : a practical guide to financial decisions for women of all ages","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.026757018777994978,"score_gpt":0.288455827258513,"score_spread":0.261698808480518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W395603784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017939288,0.00012481412,0.0011425907,0.0006088111,0.0006527731,0.0012782984,0.0014288904,0.00010122282,0.9767233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033195848,0.0013271798,0.0023016317,0.00042888222,0.00048729114,0.000006659454,0.00018004293,0.00004437812,0.9919044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752945,0.00013995267,0.00034730777,0.0006366126,0.00063209113,0.0007145911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976225,0.0007834742,0.00026149355,0.00044672913,0.0003982471,0.00048756122],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048131603,0.00033621833,0.0005771598,0.0006244506,0.00046728677,0.00007786293,0.0008914626,0.00073963596,0.0004933444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007021191,0.0003924717,0.00029702467,0.00042191576,0.0003376218,0.00029892355,0.00016802955,0.00035840567,0.00005699622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004773596,0.00027018468,0.01484721,0.0000653871,0.0002334692,0.00019612155,0.0036742755,0.0001076764,8.5696905e-7,0.04829008,0.92635214,0.005485221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005945159,0.0001744297,0.0003447943,0.00008263501,0.00013619813,3.8539625e-9,0.035629693,0.0000075021057,0.0000014149516,0.0038983317,0.9587231,0.00040736352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091961236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12161955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12069994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002275045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W406976","doi":"10.1139/m77-125","title":"Welfare Policy: A Critical Site of Struggle for Women's Safety","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.016220973588973002,"score_gpt":0.28822667910338307,"score_spread":0.27200570551441006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W406976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95268494,0.00043940474,0.000027179687,0.005740439,0.000523788,0.00039610782,0.0011748524,0.000052817562,0.038960468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99355936,0.0000829071,0.00017476043,0.0006539748,0.0004746684,0.00014096423,0.000013795632,0.000020146595,0.004879404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979116,0.00007141214,0.00028624607,0.00026853007,0.0002464,0.0012158536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986472,0.00023586393,0.000058720656,0.00018395214,0.00040442724,0.00046984086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004380445,0.00017047247,0.00037307577,0.00024359056,0.0011793621,0.000040299896,0.00019483062,0.000110763256,0.00008523004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074841327,0.00017832569,0.000075604155,0.0004992141,0.0007099654,0.00010465887,0.000035780322,0.00008295851,0.000008183825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002317187,0.00004602648,0.014759659,0.00016091246,0.000121386445,0.000010486355,0.11901674,0.000034105433,0.00002085465,0.86353695,0.0019289699,0.00034073455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048330458,0.00013081235,0.01826215,0.000018218845,0.00001868025,5.562096e-7,0.68261296,0.000017631364,0.000002328932,0.100579366,0.19752623,0.00034778207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030649506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3400977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7629576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002180298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011551294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97580546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200177648","doi":"10.1111/japp.12569","title":"Why a <scp>UBI</scp> Will Never Be High Enough","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Economics; Workforce; Payment; Distribution (mathematics); Labour economics; Welfare; Perception; Consumption (sociology); Income distribution; Basic income; Economic inequality; Public economics; Demographic economics; Welfare economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Psychology; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.021939110970899595,"score_gpt":0.25444538529629745,"score_spread":0.23250627432539786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200177648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6141072,0.00089327106,0.00071883295,0.025156818,0.0024566792,0.00025993242,0.000042171338,0.000068193396,0.3562969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97949636,0.00057765597,0.0032461013,0.0127107,0.003291788,0.0000040235386,0.000008127662,0.000034884826,0.00063038804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976709,0.00010727793,0.00052963244,0.00024945193,0.0009845138,0.0004582171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982068,0.00025956953,0.000438661,0.00025568108,0.0005003263,0.00033895968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005948454,0.00020857631,0.00042805946,0.00013641252,0.00041163512,0.00013952957,0.0004828555,0.00023211594,0.00010573532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015424879,0.00019804885,0.00023747388,0.0006432357,0.00021308001,0.00045957926,0.0000827864,0.0005020681,0.000027019958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003148264,0.0004051623,0.0009838792,0.000035881127,0.00024910018,0.00019217466,0.023406724,0.0005006723,0.0020465974,0.9338941,0.03780494,0.00044927307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010204131,0.00008420816,0.0024946062,0.000031190037,0.00010770769,0.000019182151,0.00986483,0.000015098235,0.0003031335,0.38894343,0.59696907,0.00014709376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008016886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055380544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55916417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015342425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055395043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80761975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200558597","doi":"10.3386/w29548","title":"Productivity and Pay in the US and Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Economics; Agricultural economics; Business; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.22701845029417136,"score_gpt":0.4724011172628986,"score_spread":0.2453826669687272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200558597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48164743,0.001641706,2.6236185e-7,0.0054618292,0.000490495,0.00045490373,0.00010372379,0.0000025522118,0.5101971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98871654,0.004543114,0.000017788576,0.000029324778,0.0005718818,0.000027480844,0.00006884183,0.0000075253415,0.0060174763],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746066,0.00044828947,0.00023044168,0.00032420526,0.0012853472,0.00025104103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980216,0.00088161544,0.0000864729,0.00013842795,0.0008140561,0.00005785444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008304855,0.00008180182,0.00020811813,0.00015372352,0.00023980666,0.00008152841,0.00023714577,0.00015607715,0.000034076507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018191469,0.00006259607,0.00002220287,0.0001482009,0.00041091882,0.00007535677,0.00008460121,0.0005019613,5.891679e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001584011,0.00010587777,0.59156865,0.0002966314,0.00012537057,0.000032084394,0.0056293933,0.00010815771,0.000012543855,0.3109716,0.08742717,0.003706713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027011224,0.000030009403,0.6015479,0.000062159794,0.000010484607,0.000017478787,0.00912861,0.000086422006,0.0000030850103,0.105148554,0.28344116,0.00025399684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9420978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5070691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012480548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024187138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9813448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205106578","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/6rv34","title":"Population Externalities and Optimal Social Policy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; University of Texas at Austin","keywords":"Externality; Fertility; Subsidy; Economics; Population; Altruism (biology); Public economics; Total fertility rate; Welfare; Microeconomics; Government (linguistics); Imperfect; Family planning; Demography; Market economy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04019206546756882,"score_gpt":0.343390339509447,"score_spread":0.30319827404187816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205106578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89855665,0.00015358544,0.00041880444,0.0020471937,0.00080982625,0.00021577015,0.000088946574,0.0001342507,0.097574994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97763866,0.00041187502,0.0010400154,0.00037486688,0.0019444457,0.000027726359,0.00010248218,0.000016147476,0.018443799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863195,0.00020969834,0.000182311,0.00028382393,0.00042126584,0.00027092604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996339,0.000028227181,0.000104498686,0.00011298802,0.000047375866,0.000073010895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042208566,0.00013704087,0.00019614874,0.00011992672,0.0009044669,0.00021117172,0.00023911598,0.00021544864,0.00040462695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051221352,0.00015155252,0.00008146178,0.00011537999,0.00014619638,0.00007897482,0.0005330856,0.0003152416,0.0000026259481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009186386,0.000035283727,0.10355659,0.000059878523,0.000044291915,0.0000034860805,0.110674046,0.00037738384,0.0000025419254,0.78032935,0.0013451601,0.0035627803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018965873,0.000017891567,0.7755545,0.000008895284,0.00003588302,7.038046e-7,0.10871063,0.00047454957,2.5561044e-7,0.09665957,0.017876737,0.00047074162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.123060465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003286272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6836698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002779961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003568425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8827791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205280974","doi":"10.1038/s41598-021-04352-y","title":"Alleviating time poverty among the working poor: a pre-registered longitudinal field experiment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles; University of California, Los Angeles; Harvard Business School; Harvard University","keywords":"Poverty; Voucher; Population; Scarcity; Psychology; Demographic economics; Medicine; Economics; Economic growth; Environmental health","score_opus":0.03456766984592626,"score_gpt":0.2890157432995345,"score_spread":0.25444807345360826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205280974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9407612,0.00038950425,0.00024736262,0.0013055044,0.009787416,0.0006038225,0.000002344236,0.00013048276,0.04677235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96772134,0.000004172965,0.00018141496,0.000313847,0.00018534744,0.000082079416,0.00001549811,0.000013391199,0.031482924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966821,0.00028764087,0.00045817488,0.00070012215,0.0013372545,0.00053472945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984649,0.00012741564,0.00042223328,0.0007714212,0.00008928561,0.00012477758],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040934645,0.00014051519,0.00016745858,0.00008034771,0.0045809047,0.00064280425,0.00047581855,0.000053926426,0.000893153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002955077,0.00011500036,0.00014788573,0.00067754835,0.00033636342,0.00016755045,0.0003774833,0.00025370638,0.000010814035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003060535,0.00031616446,0.63542503,0.000017528393,0.00011279714,0.00061824225,0.15750404,0.0013712681,0.0036676046,0.0023860184,0.19335482,0.0051958878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005082247,0.00019939178,0.094401866,0.00010979849,0.00012277921,0.00016762878,0.11564576,0.010020863,0.0007304875,0.013088317,0.76364034,0.001364521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017470622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008842555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57028556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023441274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003109862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206127244","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3988202","title":"Zero-hours Contracts in a Frictional Labor Market","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Workload; Zero (linguistics); Appeal; Work (physics); Business; Welfare; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Operations management; Economics; Computer science; Market economy; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.008527053645576018,"score_gpt":0.2589055658359579,"score_spread":0.2503785121903819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206127244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94823235,0.0060939547,0.0026139468,0.0041092653,0.0010873405,0.00011777865,0.0000122628935,0.000044255088,0.037688825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97588,0.014406127,0.00014376556,0.0004805819,0.00046181306,0.0000037173859,0.000004189095,0.000015367717,0.008604427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966223,0.0003533505,0.00025381602,0.00019692996,0.00047270485,0.0021008598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929166,0.00011761226,0.000101970305,0.00010200852,0.00024281579,0.00014391165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023945519,0.000116489435,0.00017017155,0.00010435913,0.00043093655,0.00011461922,0.00022554169,0.00013617676,0.00020995132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032693185,0.000120315555,0.00009347179,0.0005623533,0.0000612024,0.00023397873,0.000021675334,0.0014581045,0.000021147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047714217,0.00023803013,0.22604306,0.0000024640824,0.00009860733,0.00008605159,0.0043870485,0.000087238266,0.00022394623,0.76171416,0.0014613739,0.0056103123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017321202,0.00010064102,0.3032672,0.000034532586,0.000038286595,0.00023721633,0.07342088,0.00013654919,0.000010400806,0.58194417,0.038687717,0.0003902603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055112044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039179094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17976998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013505209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009480929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206231659","doi":"10.4000/books.irdeditions.9679","title":"Bibliographie","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IRD Éditions eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03867319872012148,"score_gpt":0.2649385496385785,"score_spread":0.226265350918457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206231659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004386407,0.0006207215,0.00056019257,0.0009906283,0.0035372837,0.00076753314,0.0012389815,0.0002753708,0.98762286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.087491915,0.0041991165,0.001844118,0.0011457802,0.001963431,0.00013495945,0.00020246096,0.0001367136,0.9028815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969348,0.00012698224,0.0006418995,0.0007117832,0.00075039646,0.0008341409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769914,0.00023737052,0.00034932428,0.0007082667,0.00049592956,0.00050999137],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029793874,0.00062701816,0.0005422858,0.0024105315,0.0024297717,0.00028092533,0.00067880994,0.0010430373,0.0078204665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023127574,0.0006946482,0.0006633668,0.0005985768,0.004198703,0.00022327165,0.00012515408,0.0007743207,0.00651973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017553971,0.000040721923,0.00026004578,0.000033096116,0.00015932955,0.000021672093,0.001055105,0.000005497414,0.000020425286,0.96006143,0.031559292,0.0067816107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019632047,0.00007602847,0.0020597659,0.0001520638,0.00021050122,0.000008554665,0.0011227293,0.000032856566,0.0000016731241,0.2766385,0.7188121,0.00068889576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002026114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001536266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6872528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013920257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030548102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207040888","doi":"10.54932/hvdc9170","title":"Zero-hours Contracts in a Frictional Labor Market","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; European University Institute","keywords":"Workload; Zero (linguistics); Welfare; Work (physics); Business; Labour economics; Face (sociological concept); Microeconomics; Economics; Market economy; Engineering; Management","score_opus":0.031648219277612306,"score_gpt":0.3123715175603619,"score_spread":0.2807232982827496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4207040888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01065738,0.0009830539,0.000058442874,0.0005687245,0.005149155,0.0004295146,0.00034300273,0.00013651632,0.9816742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21941912,0.025547637,0.000721996,0.0016604936,0.0020296217,0.00024441496,0.0004488803,0.000111586814,0.74981624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626964,0.0003272798,0.00043768712,0.0004635124,0.0019236191,0.00057823496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868304,0.00029400975,0.0002247862,0.00024033802,0.0003819151,0.00017590092],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025885028,0.0002376675,0.00041626347,0.00027351844,0.0004320442,0.00009610517,0.000414091,0.0004520001,0.01106235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006895158,0.00024579052,0.00015118494,0.0007110395,0.0001010525,0.00011699249,0.00009853247,0.0007314697,0.000027453847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023725544,0.00028624243,0.2917674,0.000038766735,0.00011030941,0.00017585771,0.0058607324,0.00006839284,0.000002181835,0.020418093,0.6795877,0.0016605606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018756888,0.000015930216,0.23103623,0.000015965703,0.000022592098,0.000003968581,0.008723461,0.000018592718,4.6426997e-8,0.0012629452,0.75844604,0.00026662508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033430543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039845496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23185796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013587979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006511489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210436637","doi":"10.1111/caje.12554","title":"Gender identity and relative income within households: Evidence from Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Demographic economics; Survey data collection; Census; Norm (philosophy); Economics; World Values Survey; Geography; Distribution (mathematics); Demography; Sociology; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.1538858962389791,"score_gpt":0.22275998468225758,"score_spread":0.06887408844327847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210436637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99152106,0.001843357,0.00011730436,0.002321277,0.0027432346,0.00013176337,0.00033450912,0.000005839783,0.0009816291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958605,0.0009156641,0.0009304517,0.0012225881,0.00060528226,0.000003562396,0.000009592786,0.000033828874,0.00041850787],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978719,0.00026351833,0.0007516954,0.00040115774,0.000010198248,0.0007015325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958258,0.00042803225,0.0005676304,0.00032431705,0.00043080671,0.0024233744],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010801082,0.00023428812,0.00052339194,0.00018524275,0.00054724474,0.00030898597,0.0005424539,0.00022529742,0.00019771309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010795334,0.00030331532,0.00011530042,0.00021445518,0.00031885225,0.001491159,0.000038909508,0.00047408455,0.0000038981593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016421685,0.000006300836,0.50489753,0.00002367034,0.00025948376,0.0008361843,0.027570227,0.0020645282,0.000014551348,0.4636132,0.0004552807,0.00024263177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085702667,0.0001004691,0.31428608,0.00031473069,0.0001899226,0.00025894804,0.04456867,0.00071139407,0.000050475453,0.627865,0.009754847,0.0010423956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19061142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046225777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02988599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210975464","doi":"10.1007/s10603-021-09501-4","title":"The Impact of Tax Refund Delays on the Experience of Hardship Among Lower-Income Households","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Annie E. Casey Foundation","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Internal revenue; Payment; Debt; Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Revenue; Labour economics; Income tax; Service (business); Tax credit; Economics; Finance; Public economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.03487271767497859,"score_gpt":0.33551996529483585,"score_spread":0.3006472476198573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210975464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99303025,0.00045346125,0.00001358097,0.0010315274,0.00037686212,0.00012263627,0.00005599975,0.000005620187,0.0049100528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985917,0.0005811885,0.000016979895,0.00014349373,0.00018684106,0.0000052272026,1.7522807e-7,0.000012716331,0.0004616731],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976565,0.00055143744,0.000531048,0.00008939145,0.00084024284,0.00033136355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778116,0.00066695514,0.0008637419,0.0003069591,0.00024629108,0.00013487948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017978527,0.00011714786,0.00025640603,0.00012939975,0.0007859222,0.000054479926,0.0009218663,0.0000527322,0.000068189125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006591852,0.00006637889,0.00031819986,0.0006265414,0.0008354275,0.0001384677,0.00009537536,0.00040447354,0.0000012771827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033230265,0.00028184336,0.84838146,0.000011272638,0.00039713067,0.000026986168,0.08890517,0.0014884996,0.00093663257,0.050165657,0.006753459,0.0023195813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006449082,0.00080020836,0.93704385,0.000045519548,0.0000568674,0.000026766766,0.042884745,0.00011686004,0.00012909353,0.0053690933,0.012668144,0.00021394984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009535256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004921573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08866238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002720281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011816829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99706036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211255941","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/534e4","title":"Top incomes and the gender divide","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Demographic economics; Distribution (mathematics); Economics; Income distribution; Labour economics; Income tax; Sample (material); Wage; Inequality; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0318898676420695,"score_gpt":0.2977557928924393,"score_spread":0.2658659252503698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211255941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14812098,0.001616854,0.020062514,0.010214991,0.002386809,0.0007087415,0.00003741934,0.00018302149,0.8166687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98084295,0.0023414192,0.00025322556,0.0010891662,0.0005678335,0.000028258675,0.000003182635,0.000011584458,0.014862369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862725,0.00027511382,0.00017126994,0.000304654,0.00033498975,0.00028671746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904644,0.00034105842,0.000082838276,0.0003482648,0.00008465445,0.00009676889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010287345,0.00015347899,0.00023061747,0.00004031823,0.00041552098,0.00016613561,0.00046754646,0.00026524102,0.00011837585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015557335,0.00007945403,0.000096760705,0.00006085132,0.0007453332,0.0000549148,0.0006831581,0.00023935735,0.00002735039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008464534,0.000011642903,0.11216841,0.000024067236,0.00007265853,0.0000014853124,0.029937992,0.0000049010987,0.0000019638958,0.85204774,0.0019758642,0.0037448162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006316436,0.000004113829,0.1072832,0.000021171356,0.00005511455,5.2888794e-7,0.013162206,0.00013321347,0.0000011246024,0.8372239,0.0411583,0.00032551578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037923197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027828997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.832722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055510456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025785007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5732878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212990044","doi":"10.53846/goediss-7016","title":"Essays on Gender, Migration, and Development","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wageningen University and Research; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Department for International Development; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; European Commission; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Inequality; Context (archaeology); Positive economics; Human capital; Human development (humanity); Development economics; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Geography; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03098655547547785,"score_gpt":0.3003881331497246,"score_spread":0.2694015776742468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212990044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41517806,0.00016994136,0.00026125996,0.00006946009,0.0013005375,0.00023865745,0.0000053764074,0.00008675177,0.58268994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69715816,0.0021498022,0.012517482,0.0011171028,0.0010372296,0.00013016154,0.0014874581,0.00007272504,0.28432992],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883175,0.0000506556,0.00019373819,0.0002956392,0.00039626987,0.00023192236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994667,0.000032787975,0.00008881664,0.0001146948,0.00021082544,0.000086143955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028240558,0.00016494155,0.00014470585,0.000093456125,0.00061787426,0.000106414496,0.00014426006,0.00030729506,0.00033327617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005260858,0.00015333536,0.000025262876,0.00011474384,0.00006173153,0.00006307703,0.000008484401,0.00010596374,0.00012785656],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060416947,0.00020909039,0.034396585,0.00020307883,0.00017018549,0.00000522648,0.6407162,0.0000025180666,0.00003356614,0.23424861,0.06086843,0.029086087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028749657,0.00006151673,0.2092003,0.00007215316,0.00003923909,3.033606e-7,0.25774625,0.00003636516,0.00007272171,0.007761978,0.5239494,0.0007722992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052107003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08032382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46308097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008561453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005939659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9364579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213441932","doi":"10.1111/j.1752-1734.2007.00006.x","title":"NOTAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revista Internacional de Seguridad Social","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Social policy; Political science; Humanities; Poverty; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Citizenship; Sociology; Economic history; Art; Law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.02756787828538369,"score_gpt":0.32629827054793265,"score_spread":0.29873039226254894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213441932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8532717,0.009228412,0.013177088,0.009483943,0.006571544,0.00041167543,0.00033395205,0.0001842489,0.10733744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9427701,0.0030213776,0.0010541969,0.0022883979,0.009701441,0.000008343255,0.000048937232,0.000076102435,0.04103108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543905,0.00045618654,0.0008098196,0.00060290477,0.0011559383,0.0015361061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810773,0.00035067284,0.0003490112,0.0002492839,0.00040072566,0.0005425783],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029087216,0.00044569973,0.0005378824,0.0008523164,0.0009858677,0.00042465905,0.000852758,0.00072336436,0.0013266077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002080371,0.00052810076,0.00067196484,0.003637771,0.0012180456,0.00036860353,0.0001821322,0.000824649,0.0010053501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007968097,0.00033936658,0.03015802,0.00014338306,0.00020983233,0.00023349404,0.019011991,0.000005152531,0.00024219987,0.8966321,0.034372345,0.018572439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005499293,0.00008496464,0.10035776,0.00016444539,0.00013983173,0.000034804063,0.008749322,0.00012238255,0.000019991845,0.0051635453,0.88396055,0.0006524638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013332571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008020488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8914685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011297241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059639616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214775385","doi":"10.1177/01640275211046322","title":"My Wife Is My Insurance Policy: Household Bargaining and Couples’ Purchase of Long-Term Care Insurance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research on Aging","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Long-term care insurance; Wife; Bargaining power; Asset (computer security); Welfare; Demographic economics; Business; Test (biology); Term (time); Economics; Actuarial science; Health insurance; Labour economics; Health care; Long-term care; Microeconomics; Nursing; Medicine; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0974943649114532,"score_gpt":0.39914146532084555,"score_spread":0.30164710040939235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214775385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879526,0.002414387,0.000031687476,0.00086122786,0.0001055007,0.0003441757,0.00027369667,0.00005895773,0.007957761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724,0.0016610138,0.000046060177,0.00036790993,0.0001909159,0.000045065593,0.000012382024,0.00003114244,0.00040548973],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963648,0.00056300656,0.0002331713,0.00042927926,0.0016159255,0.0007938324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987739,0.00030861102,0.00008597749,0.00034598736,0.0002446093,0.00024094796],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020564715,0.00013652546,0.00022868319,0.00043129813,0.00174219,0.00011747921,0.00054582494,0.000063315194,0.000035951194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026571797,0.0001515865,0.000057190962,0.0013992456,0.0005728401,0.00016658,0.00035539057,0.0007008982,0.0000036444292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039988718,0.00007390168,0.89152473,0.0001007568,0.000021097618,0.00007000013,0.08932944,0.00046390737,0.00049021805,0.0074542672,0.00015157163,0.010280112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008770592,0.00019306794,0.89689666,0.00013428745,0.0000036932547,0.0000041370954,0.09813798,0.000313591,0.00015543592,0.0006185243,0.002377724,0.0002878342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043565985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000412543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009992277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039179577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007575331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214877123","doi":"10.46692/9781447315797.005","title":"Western industrial countries (I): women are able – in various ways","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.029047184925068654,"score_gpt":0.2577832892837293,"score_spread":0.22873610435866062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214877123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003247678,0.00024203342,0.00039511255,0.00019328661,0.0020059398,0.00038019705,0.0000612471,0.00024131486,0.9932332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016859267,0.0005765421,0.000096369295,0.0007988755,0.0019276827,0.00003993088,0.000019894089,0.00018230478,0.97949916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818623,0.00013216116,0.00022073375,0.0002899028,0.00044383892,0.0007271038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929035,0.000070575334,0.0001888824,0.0002466409,0.000031719912,0.00017185388],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000688977,0.00023236293,0.0004319413,0.00020715596,0.00012490108,0.00012686396,0.00038733069,0.0009412013,0.0045262594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005656721,0.00021899623,0.000041652733,0.0002491897,0.00019492043,0.00006501,0.000057272973,0.00030187756,0.0005728101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010998412,0.00008322229,0.3896049,0.000040893716,0.000052706902,0.000009973637,0.021116527,0.000004873382,2.3980607e-7,0.022861807,0.56579566,0.00041819352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043638298,0.000015400547,0.0026532004,0.000052805637,0.0000088702645,2.013817e-7,0.0093416,0.0000033378171,6.369294e-8,0.0004897257,0.9867015,0.00029693282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02147658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112071164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4209058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032785063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003622268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220885494","doi":"10.1111/ecot.12322","title":"The effects of the Arab Spring on female labour force participation in the MENA region","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Middle East; Generalized method of moments; Estimator; Economics; Politics; Demographic economics; Spring (device); Empirical research; Panel data; Development economics; Econometrics; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.03819539443811044,"score_gpt":0.2646288217301869,"score_spread":0.2264334272920765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220885494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99452037,0.00016152178,0.00009524417,0.003271671,0.00034869456,0.00029892323,0.000018550727,0.0000033502695,0.0012817028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984057,0.0006837324,0.000007053919,0.0007294553,0.00006866194,0.00006915291,0.0000038394946,0.0000020419848,0.000030372792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994562,0.00014571422,0.00012546277,0.00007758546,0.000103211154,0.000091821865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968725,0.00012704756,0.00007137967,0.00008211803,0.000018061362,0.000014152193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004823254,0.000042639007,0.00006174307,0.000028557159,0.0007186695,0.0000138105825,0.00013243448,0.00002265425,0.000002521878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025144844,0.000028999493,0.000038440703,0.00009821382,0.00018820542,0.00009943647,0.00001377696,0.00008351674,2.4640963e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038282287,0.00007788295,0.0040814113,0.000030318508,0.000008864342,5.288162e-7,0.034130316,0.0029739204,0.00005696622,0.95755935,0.000012090134,0.0010300732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013017894,0.000270341,0.92819345,0.00007603516,0.000033484554,0.0000029596683,0.02896358,0.006025111,0.00022476594,0.019121058,0.0155902915,0.00019710898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005556661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001921006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9384383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069880196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054904875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55274975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221053428","doi":"10.33937/reveco.2022.250","title":"Determinantes de la participación económica de la mujer en México: un enfoque de calificación laboral","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Economía Facultad de Economía Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.010598539927835458,"score_gpt":0.2799403241234185,"score_spread":0.2693417841955831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221053428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709616,0.0013243909,0.0010515644,0.0016739904,0.00034351426,0.00079876336,0.0016916107,0.00032551333,0.021829054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98683953,0.0031404,0.0037097877,0.0015874127,0.0006153606,0.00017589111,0.00012808465,0.00020310101,0.0036004183],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98758227,0.0057682022,0.0013059296,0.0015695416,0.00033472184,0.0034393661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934289,0.002645039,0.00096851826,0.0010665602,0.0001541937,0.0017367844],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006861041,0.0011175248,0.0014498244,0.0006071194,0.0023073435,0.0018416628,0.0024656742,0.0012198968,0.0020843798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007269284,0.0014772288,0.000872402,0.0009260024,0.0014326671,0.0008883517,0.0007329679,0.0019946685,0.00023371805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020465201,0.00091243006,0.7315593,0.00035589276,0.00076520507,0.0011975033,0.052745566,0.0058126636,0.0010468981,0.19716017,0.003719521,0.0045202547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031341068,0.00048594,0.33445835,0.0001846062,0.00092083105,0.0007468534,0.07773601,0.02504689,0.00042708713,0.008063189,0.54616374,0.002632393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047377385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005792236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5424442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011115719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008676913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223474230","doi":"10.1002/pam.22583","title":"The impact of parental benefits on disadvantaged households","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Poverty; Government (linguistics); Schedule; Demographic economics; Duration (music); Public economics; Business; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.020214075009356392,"score_gpt":0.34493187647378626,"score_spread":0.32471780146442986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223474230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98803157,0.0014952514,0.00044543343,0.0015699107,0.00015671202,0.00008436483,0.000023986826,0.000008867899,0.008183916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98029697,0.018768048,0.00004111437,0.000050262042,0.00020607034,9.304436e-7,0.0000010935466,0.0000052035202,0.0006303355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896705,0.00008753951,0.0002983559,0.000089868605,0.00037308567,0.00018409423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947864,0.00010691304,0.00015883504,0.00011126522,0.000048191323,0.00009616268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008157604,0.0000842252,0.00020039195,0.0003673161,0.00026517687,0.0001568826,0.00018665104,0.000028212875,0.000009491343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032351974,0.000047890047,0.000420104,0.0009893007,0.000101587306,0.00009934249,0.000038656835,0.000090632566,0.0000010587999],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011694935,0.00039906197,0.15497307,0.000097735385,0.017525936,0.00008123113,0.024847277,0.024326624,0.00006193259,0.64299303,0.008155418,0.12642172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002862374,0.00026270133,0.96400684,0.00006829993,0.0017345853,0.0000020067855,0.018852355,0.0014767272,0.0000051931806,0.0041248174,0.009037446,0.0001428138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00210827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012383843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80903375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013191997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000540947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31870878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223505049","doi":"10.1515/bejeap-2020-0129","title":"Childcare, Parental Behavior and Well-Being during Childhood","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Developmental psychology; Psychology; Mental health; Depression (economics); Early childhood; Adverse Childhood Experiences; Psychiatry; Economics","score_opus":0.007972655367911355,"score_gpt":0.266944872771327,"score_spread":0.25897221740341564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223505049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924963,0.00030580375,0.000009241376,0.000922468,0.00014618883,0.00007527329,0.000011661059,0.000008189517,0.0060248477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978145,0.00089020556,0.00002306169,0.0002240965,0.0006204394,0.00000308672,0.0000031593086,0.00001090173,0.00041055455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986976,0.00028158235,0.00042375783,0.00011857701,0.00019872836,0.000279798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914235,0.00006633238,0.00044981414,0.00017061087,0.000028490267,0.00014243026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009862154,0.00010888398,0.000305523,0.00046311226,0.0012972269,0.00007502309,0.0004884414,0.000030913896,0.00021792615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023968187,0.000093135524,0.0002823635,0.00044068092,0.00014187848,0.00016683662,0.00015187993,0.00027389123,0.0000062525005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022260721,0.00013704189,0.9075572,0.0000019719675,0.0011230691,0.000008408671,0.07300808,0.00780153,0.000035393896,0.009613244,0.00010616573,0.00058566016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043006978,0.000038557133,0.94409096,0.0000020889213,0.0012953329,0.00004743733,0.051652804,0.00017831246,0.0000052985374,0.0015217788,0.00059859594,0.0001387499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005212955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014267105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036533803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004365645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029438504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99773514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224438317","doi":"10.1007/s10834-022-09844-1","title":"Intra-household Financial Inequality, Gender Equality, and Marital Dissolution","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Inequality; Asset (computer security); Earnings; Economics; Financial stability; Demographic economics; Perspective (graphical); Marital status; Finance; Financial system; Sociology","score_opus":0.0670204846297039,"score_gpt":0.30866764883760683,"score_spread":0.24164716420790294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224438317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922833,0.0025149519,0.00011634158,0.0007784141,0.0011946304,0.000079995254,0.000047354933,0.000014295359,0.0029707362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954215,0.0029139756,0.00021138614,0.00047804354,0.0006624076,0.000002254704,0.0000032829716,0.00000992231,0.0002972188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986612,0.00025685687,0.00045893318,0.00016067892,0.00020322212,0.0002591159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993806,0.000083127146,0.00027749085,0.00008471938,0.00003579792,0.00013826157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019453724,0.000112327165,0.0002811339,0.000107094296,0.0006835909,0.0001186962,0.00018462355,0.00007803785,0.000049577888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056715195,0.00011744081,0.00007170511,0.00006473538,0.00018167934,0.00037002144,0.00015510674,0.00027452502,0.000001836975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002883126,0.00032165166,0.58802336,0.0000913757,0.00018413071,0.00005678483,0.12664396,0.0015687252,0.00051146175,0.2588497,0.014708106,0.008752441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012533573,0.0003715643,0.73225963,0.000015552732,0.00007710601,0.000052651114,0.11075701,0.000477788,0.000006309848,0.04859391,0.10568838,0.0004467671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016986954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005524116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21025582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018894885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021963005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52576977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225166658","doi":"10.1177/00197939221093562","title":"Firm Pay Policies and the Gender Earnings Gap: The Mediating Role of Marital and Family Status","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Labor Relations Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada; Statistics Canada","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Earnings; Wage; Demographic economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Marital status; Labour economics; Gender gap; Gender pay gap; Business; Economics; Accounting; Demography; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.04495235406684127,"score_gpt":0.2893875380090785,"score_spread":0.24443518394223723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225166658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77014077,0.20847408,0.0000032996986,0.010192876,0.00024447415,0.00092821167,0.00021710084,0.000022945134,0.009776249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.903272,0.09451554,0.000038382026,0.00081329484,0.00019443226,0.00006470703,0.000019064475,0.000008807523,0.0010737923],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998462,0.0006539847,0.00027772336,0.0001337297,0.00028464652,0.00018789193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989398,0.0006389395,0.00018206044,0.000107843836,0.00006638898,0.00006492684],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015420675,0.00008712605,0.00021223196,0.000030567975,0.0013317297,0.000054262353,0.00011344997,0.00006234983,0.00008770374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073595106,0.000047759313,0.000038275975,0.00047744438,0.0004883238,0.000086356355,0.00013690042,0.00039877993,8.8126393e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031736276,0.000039219107,0.62110955,0.00010323627,0.000121864505,0.0000010631505,0.08525122,0.000055906024,0.000021528043,0.2313356,0.0034356685,0.05849343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001019153,0.000042225114,0.23854196,0.00009305762,0.00021571333,0.0000035626354,0.060131945,0.00018060401,1.5753348e-7,0.0050109415,0.694605,0.0001556988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003172863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012271082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6911693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023650076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019136678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226008180","doi":"10.1093/esr/jcac019","title":"Women’s Relative Resources and Couples’ Gender Balance in Financial Decision-Making","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Sociological Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eesti Teadusagentuur","keywords":"Earnings; Realm; Demographic economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Finance; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.04891576853193198,"score_gpt":0.3178282318580403,"score_spread":0.26891246332610835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226008180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.831299,0.11857426,0.00024367048,0.0005344761,0.00020816975,0.0004087345,0.000020791424,0.000069517184,0.0486414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90296346,0.09094451,0.0004382506,0.0052678897,0.00012312857,0.000040306488,0.0000032692128,0.000011992652,0.00020721473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996035,0.002452668,0.00035614162,0.0003840118,0.00035512735,0.00041708414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998835,0.0007350227,0.000143909,0.00014770665,0.000037414728,0.00010089579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048266244,0.00013535102,0.0003445504,0.000032484302,0.00077912444,0.000027072376,0.0003702997,0.000049161194,0.00057167176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027390986,0.00011328061,0.000074165284,0.00036354017,0.00035282777,0.000073754585,0.00034056822,0.00051720266,0.000040237348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108291795,0.0004032399,0.32541442,0.00052008685,0.00005136933,0.0007380728,0.2680346,0.00014338958,0.0000141751725,0.17587017,0.016783457,0.21191874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019650592,0.000096679236,0.4124826,0.0003263414,0.000011405398,0.0000034130094,0.012722977,0.00003106859,3.957768e-9,0.021720953,0.5521331,0.00027496472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008850894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000840126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53534967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000277963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079236415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6259405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226287021","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v23i7.4868","title":"The Labor Market Effects of State and Local Expansions of the Earned Income Tax Credit","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Current Population Survey; Incentive; Economics; Differential (mechanical device); Labour economics; State (computer science); Population; Work (physics); Differential effects; Government (linguistics); Demographic economics; Tax credit; Medicine; Public economics","score_opus":0.006355612789857142,"score_gpt":0.2113910501570518,"score_spread":0.20503543736719468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226287021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99674577,0.00045543505,0.00021399226,0.00071515894,0.0004919119,0.00008226632,0.000015760934,0.0000012086151,0.0012784881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906125,0.008835883,0.00018280928,0.00008377639,0.000100740115,0.0000013003058,2.9510173e-7,0.0000065390404,0.00017612573],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931496,0.00004470691,0.00032929244,0.00008018405,0.00009540366,0.00013546049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886966,0.00031603777,0.00039742308,0.00011578196,0.00023865185,0.000062439845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005253746,0.00007377655,0.00023633694,0.000028597497,0.00025887464,0.00005476395,0.00015823374,0.00005913442,0.0000077209215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000828451,0.00004679245,0.000042837528,0.00017439776,0.00039615805,0.00008412013,0.00008629724,0.000111543915,1.8716733e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026223066,0.0011869725,0.39136925,0.0024411313,0.0018948485,0.00007586323,0.09116276,0.017992612,0.0142544545,0.27790964,0.0063348226,0.19275534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013330271,0.000040129475,0.9437868,0.00009591823,0.00009441598,0.000010992139,0.021641465,0.00064362504,0.000615446,0.021879716,0.009695309,0.00016315469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008250184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005721642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5524176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026524795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000338153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19910806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229057974","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.53.2.070","title":"Ghanaian Couples’ Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Women’s Participation in Family Fishery Decisions and Practices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empowerment; Spouse; Perception; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Hegemony; Women's empowerment; Gender studies; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Economic growth; Geography; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.18216067941080188,"score_gpt":0.4491097522383184,"score_spread":0.2669490728275165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229057974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98734254,0.009592882,0.00008391682,0.0009987801,0.0004281846,0.00017950588,0.00001852243,0.000010431005,0.0013452478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852502,0.013561575,0.0004925841,0.00038545654,0.00011273531,0.000052474705,0.0000011718186,0.0000065402733,0.00013725918],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777484,0.0006110632,0.00051040517,0.0001889655,0.000613524,0.00030118081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997886,0.0008674417,0.000605411,0.00008439744,0.00041612418,0.00014063664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017702591,0.0001488229,0.00048850995,0.00024862087,0.0011902715,0.00010581037,0.00017238005,0.000038222388,0.000015691709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005409389,0.00013225059,0.000050155526,0.00042935173,0.00046221167,0.00051486044,0.00016504027,0.00035482497,0.0000010935381],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011148141,0.00033881716,0.5851442,0.000013534637,0.00023532865,0.000021893777,0.40719134,0.00082542474,0.00034713573,0.0014111802,0.0031314325,0.0012282099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003042133,0.0001985172,0.56364405,0.000019186808,0.000026456208,0.0000025802344,0.43069214,0.00009823116,2.6579204e-7,0.0007515478,0.0041796933,0.000083145576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002908393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002738041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023500795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000417872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029243095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9154726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229765696","doi":"10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs298","title":"Household Labor","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Encyclopedia of Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Work (physics); Child care; Care work; Labour economics; Paid work; Work hours; Psychology; Demographic economics; Working hours; Business; Nursing; Economics; Medicine; Economic growth; Engineering","score_opus":0.04064396518996104,"score_gpt":0.31734699125333327,"score_spread":0.2767030260633722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229765696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017779511,0.034013283,0.000029613755,0.00031094978,0.0038731063,0.0003938488,0.0005117297,0.0003433427,0.9587462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00036291734,0.27522564,0.00051431847,0.00023540636,0.001555542,0.00003400609,0.0000055728237,0.00022291737,0.72184366],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977923,0.00016290088,0.00038367204,0.0004420406,0.0006649357,0.00055417494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864125,0.0002563638,0.00038128629,0.00042616748,0.00017311766,0.00012178771],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003651972,0.0003788145,0.0007680576,0.00026418883,0.00021572718,0.000014727259,0.000535581,0.0003938579,0.00022427659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030690324,0.00029717677,0.0001652375,0.0002917696,0.0009439365,0.00006541711,0.00015189004,0.00017404661,0.00019423635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003600002,0.000045254114,0.013163569,0.00010354649,0.00032079977,0.000008414444,0.0076776883,3.3345555e-7,0.0000055894475,0.0075640217,0.96930844,0.0017987498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025851294,0.00002681978,0.0081348615,0.00023487078,0.00008844046,9.402661e-8,0.018764803,5.82671e-8,4.2219708e-7,0.00095340225,0.9711672,0.00037051906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015199766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00323109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24121235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010197496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033351398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231083336","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v21i9.2687","title":"Intra-household Manageable Income and the Choice on Self or Other Expenditures","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Demographic economics; Engel curve; Public economics; Labour economics; Low income; Business; Aggregate expenditure","score_opus":0.014788434771373943,"score_gpt":0.22430669418957677,"score_spread":0.20951825941820282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231083336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.981104,0.000113642454,0.000037235117,0.0005488094,0.000462155,0.00016307538,0.0000029677965,0.000009746772,0.017558381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951226,0.0028906355,0.00024246766,0.0009466867,0.0004604915,0.0000022243125,2.9871887e-7,0.000015176008,0.0003193913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937224,0.000019397168,0.00024100803,0.00011703229,0.0000806514,0.00016964861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993606,0.00018096046,0.00024968723,0.00010969319,0.000031947366,0.000067114364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056641543,0.00010383344,0.000257489,0.000066905144,0.00020654585,0.00018601873,0.00018580639,0.0000839325,0.000032329393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001132478,0.0000636148,0.000030453437,0.000069293455,0.00013423486,0.00017343825,0.000037418333,0.00014038268,0.000004798477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027297412,0.00030871085,0.09680116,0.0002445849,0.0005385779,0.000012984308,0.032733332,0.019317774,0.00007308287,0.83593094,0.0016502128,0.009658903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013401756,0.00018452923,0.45208004,0.00012461284,0.00022824411,0.00004146842,0.051128753,0.0027134626,0.00002789661,0.04613324,0.43297267,0.0009633205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002884354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047734086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7897977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000449571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007767594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25941366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232418781","doi":"10.18226/35353535.v5.2016.06","title":"O gasto público com gestante: um estudo no município de Vacaria/RS","year":2016,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Mostra de Iniciação Científica, Pós-graduação, Pesquisa e Extensão","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Nurses in Oncology","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03473859717513949,"score_gpt":0.29663412680900453,"score_spread":0.26189552963386503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232418781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9429457,0.0028589189,0.008180527,0.014117782,0.011491558,0.0025776091,0.0018581044,0.0012424183,0.014727346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600094,0.00483653,0.0012270946,0.004303117,0.0023164738,0.0001566664,0.000090655,0.00038705752,0.02667302],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.982413,0.0024957412,0.0026894405,0.003160279,0.0032142436,0.0060272943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890228,0.001742508,0.0014267795,0.0031388311,0.0019993614,0.002669704],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057219253,0.0020599018,0.0022441163,0.0008895784,0.00258159,0.0010745781,0.005095625,0.001977609,0.0012326165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029169125,0.0018787114,0.0014210583,0.003115893,0.0022693174,0.0010410661,0.0012409048,0.0020524776,0.0027087438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002184071,0.010122632,0.29641783,0.00065174256,0.0027909824,0.0036836674,0.26629695,0.00035587954,0.022674233,0.0866537,0.20432067,0.10384763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015226965,0.0036780615,0.39158505,0.0027288015,0.002330455,0.00060548825,0.14748321,0.010136066,0.0005319294,0.012866156,0.40266302,0.01016481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024374176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046680984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19834235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025739644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00329018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232430011","doi":"10.2307/3341465","title":"Who Cares? Women's Work, Childcare, and Welfare State Redesign","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Welfare; Work (physics); Welfare state; State (computer science); Gender studies; Engineering; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.017813337025199442,"score_gpt":0.2433334612445187,"score_spread":0.22552012421931927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232430011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798253,0.0018008905,0.00003048345,0.006605853,0.0007281624,0.00009173869,0.0000100743655,0.000004661572,0.010902827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973142,0.00034904934,0.000048300215,0.001142733,0.00013746269,0.0000018480563,5.618054e-7,0.000009930373,0.0009959101],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983168,0.000708856,0.00020752166,0.0000963823,0.00013037346,0.00054004777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988899,0.000115740855,0.00015966987,0.00010525921,0.00019454915,0.00053488475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015314937,0.000095061194,0.00021092001,0.00009320942,0.0012108985,0.00006521434,0.00027440093,0.00014675493,0.00013855354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002845979,0.00007242989,0.000049702416,0.00015506572,0.00122167,0.00007286531,0.0000063152443,0.00037641975,0.0000036850279],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017015958,0.000008038396,0.23344217,0.0000062494705,0.00013206666,0.00011602567,0.47335684,0.00012513853,0.0000050091744,0.28628814,0.005177521,0.0013257812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007429601,0.00024797782,0.27501243,0.000027923197,0.000045976907,0.000070866314,0.3434019,0.0000028753411,0.0000017785428,0.13632414,0.24376692,0.00035427118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007947676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08653682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23858939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039804293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017538436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232453526","doi":"10.3138/9781442609730","title":"Welfare Reform in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Welfare reform; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019262942957227587,"score_gpt":0.2129672479717969,"score_spread":0.1937043050145693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232453526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003222991,0.00083138415,0.0000033083593,0.000031982232,0.00037856356,0.00022753714,0.00018672648,0.000021462245,0.99799675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005285789,0.00038043683,0.00007854185,0.000021410006,0.00007027681,1.6463056e-7,0.00003223909,0.000013033406,0.9941181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987281,0.00007292372,0.00013508322,0.00023506414,0.00053821097,0.00029060873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991433,0.000014537224,0.00017119166,0.00027164054,0.000215249,0.00018410177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018513296,0.00015829525,0.00032019327,0.00001941575,0.00018099342,0.000009705097,0.00066909037,0.0002790358,0.000113560636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008677937,0.00019968934,0.00006566015,0.000002393037,0.0001830853,0.00009809286,0.00015164273,0.00017946173,0.0000010168228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020238143,0.00006801126,0.0012533743,0.00039336976,0.00033115732,0.0004774478,0.2614409,0.000070653914,0.0000015957781,0.5329155,0.18606897,0.01677669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028486433,0.000014182821,0.0008997703,0.00004899365,0.000032248572,1.6630952e-7,0.018707806,0.00001303504,1.691627e-7,0.00026664336,0.979521,0.00021111843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.793452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015308243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007601398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234688580","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/n95gm","title":"American Exceptionalism Revisited: Tax Relief, Poverty Reduction, and the Politics of Child Tax Credits","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Exceptionalism; American exceptionalism; Tax credit; Poverty; Cash; Tax policy; Economics; Child poverty; Tax reform; Welfare; Social policy; Politics; Political science; Public economics; Political economy; Economic growth; Law; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.0135560690862212,"score_gpt":0.2730601113395709,"score_spread":0.2595040422533497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234688580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15262978,0.0052185627,0.009598009,0.1680691,0.0067680553,0.002971302,0.0029640323,0.0004043154,0.65137684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9350862,0.016736312,0.0012728437,0.0028946162,0.004279416,0.00004316997,0.00009128698,0.000041859614,0.03955433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975731,0.00043009347,0.0004692978,0.00047702165,0.0006723901,0.0003780958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980551,0.00018432239,0.0005279423,0.0005626173,0.00050376944,0.00016624133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009808938,0.0002454959,0.00048786346,0.00010378103,0.00060904986,0.00009218582,0.0005093444,0.00026757075,0.00015792256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042167754,0.00015380139,0.00017801738,0.00024439697,0.0024845882,0.00008879107,0.0003652487,0.00040843154,0.0000101869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022391836,0.000047885515,0.0030274354,0.000057077756,0.00010971576,5.9767433e-7,0.008570585,0.000012330331,0.0000095389505,0.89135057,0.0959899,0.0008019561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017845802,0.00009015172,0.09757865,0.00057084416,0.00034755078,0.00002015739,0.041970547,0.00013244283,0.000016872607,0.49250904,0.36377472,0.0012044314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011992632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003934758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7824564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013520272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037573295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235249498","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190841300.003.0006","title":"The United States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tax credit; Earned income tax credit; Double taxation; State income tax; Direct tax; Tax reform; Public economics; Tax avoidance; Indirect tax; Value-added tax; Ad valorem tax; Economics; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02425542850481776,"score_gpt":0.2352908958480303,"score_spread":0.21103546734321255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235249498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008278021,0.00005581403,0.00016348134,0.00006393895,0.000641057,0.00033056625,0.0001406184,0.00015839747,0.9976183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00007766246,0.0030936715,0.000064394444,0.0001287418,0.0003320406,6.048164e-7,0.0001412172,0.000025788033,0.9961359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984166,0.00023671864,0.00012939631,0.0003021963,0.00043695545,0.00047815533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985885,0.0002843936,0.00018306926,0.00042614876,0.00034200193,0.00017589057],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036795915,0.00022642052,0.00019930702,0.000118705124,0.0021062954,0.00015731105,0.0011088651,0.00041721092,0.000016907803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027673997,0.00020681704,0.00013425003,0.00004407824,0.0013048337,0.000064745545,0.00026227767,0.0003619234,0.0000035084954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003647779,0.000008567017,0.00003343125,0.000017170687,0.00012318093,0.000023771521,0.009826803,0.000011784514,2.3649334e-7,0.82480425,0.16445129,0.0006630255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018176288,0.00003123098,0.00002336885,0.000028819368,0.00008875014,2.8730886e-7,0.006381811,0.00008796137,5.7651215e-7,0.003814307,0.9891059,0.00025525197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019224237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028070342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8246546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041507155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070642796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235932404","doi":"10.3917/pope.203.0447","title":"Family Policies in Industrialized Countries: Is There Convergence?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Population (English Edition)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Developed country; Divergence (linguistics); Developing country; Welfare; Demographic economics; Economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Population; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.04265769083477622,"score_gpt":0.2865380233561922,"score_spread":0.243880332521416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235932404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9454652,0.00026912824,0.00012331353,0.0016668944,0.0055716876,0.00040522576,0.00014179049,0.0002114696,0.046145294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993855,0.0006765155,0.00006543857,0.0010358044,0.0024874392,0.000032967364,0.0001008423,0.00001595435,0.0017300267],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981785,0.00021107103,0.00040459548,0.0002535799,0.00058507797,0.00036722003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990929,0.00012195113,0.00015655151,0.00018368199,0.00032401556,0.00012093534],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045980877,0.00014850376,0.00020826685,0.00017357257,0.00044034942,0.00014792454,0.00020693868,0.0002835886,0.0025214746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053199806,0.00016270191,0.00006695615,0.0007060834,0.0001615303,0.00065588363,0.000020516693,0.00019507509,0.00013825533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000092652335,0.00008513782,0.8151483,0.000010899242,0.000014715175,0.0000029298683,0.055270903,0.00010677763,0.0000026945727,0.073667236,0.055407003,0.00027416454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096597295,0.000022008464,0.78796893,0.000033829678,0.000016894535,2.1116647e-7,0.029328065,0.000756165,0.0000027471135,0.006610858,0.17397498,0.0003193349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010029327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025712422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11856798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023347927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000698609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237784810","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_102568","title":"Mothering and Immigrants","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Demographic economics; History; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.020297980307521286,"score_gpt":0.248802767477691,"score_spread":0.22850478717016973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237784810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001128363,0.00028523276,0.0009919838,0.00012312211,0.00029415815,0.00010826553,0.000006774169,0.00007534732,0.99698675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03442635,0.0016692926,0.0003145802,0.0003935065,0.00030973443,0.000001167432,0.000003112591,0.000027503678,0.96285474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992745,0.0000124620165,0.00011469831,0.00020605394,0.00020616046,0.00018614279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963635,0.000039849838,0.000052930653,0.00013486797,0.000038094127,0.00009788542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021034782,0.00013720286,0.0001792526,0.000045041255,0.00019889382,0.000054875607,0.00013212246,0.00026760084,0.00040772295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011203242,0.00012792624,0.000049249596,0.000011342051,0.00017165148,0.000027686456,0.000033709355,0.0001197084,0.00009192285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010016971,0.0000014999189,0.0007440044,0.000011971762,0.00001906961,0.0000017680196,0.0035747201,5.6992303e-7,0.0000034769605,0.9869173,0.00089672476,0.007827858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012213914,0.000016933542,0.0015193622,0.00004197601,0.00002639688,7.108639e-7,0.0017561377,0.00005609483,2.9541272e-7,0.049219985,0.946899,0.00034097294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018784954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008481182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94600224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027955572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048478898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.521668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238471791","doi":"10.1017/9781108235594.029","title":"Findings from CBAs of Welfare-to-Work Programs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Valuation (finance); Contingent valuation; Preference; Craft; Variety (cybernetics); Cost–benefit analysis; Welfare; Cover (algebra); Time preference; Actuarial science; Work (physics); Computer science; Economics; Management science; Operations research; Willingness to pay; Microeconomics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Accounting","score_opus":0.027412867345064228,"score_gpt":0.22364037653296592,"score_spread":0.1962275091879017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238471791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02783849,0.000049077054,0.00023260165,0.000053006628,0.0006788926,0.0006763529,0.00046101704,0.00014861258,0.9698619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030989015,0.000068435234,0.00047927457,0.00006508009,0.00031390044,9.3792875e-7,0.0001014484,0.000045385485,0.9679365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980916,0.000068522364,0.00023655391,0.000580647,0.00057632144,0.00044637016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843585,0.00006176575,0.00022625647,0.0005385443,0.00039840647,0.0003392001],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020573067,0.00033855057,0.00048230463,0.00018046997,0.00052085426,0.000066050445,0.0009828955,0.0006373892,0.00004778114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022955675,0.00041473447,0.00025569185,0.00003864288,0.00083974586,0.000078448786,0.00037076158,0.0003315729,0.000043904012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009642249,0.000025735311,0.0005504549,0.000037019654,0.00020216814,0.00005930716,0.0058632884,8.025688e-7,0.000010541845,0.97411597,0.017709108,0.0013292072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029241067,0.00007959512,0.0009168708,0.00019376015,0.00020476498,2.5302893e-7,0.00230047,0.0000028594375,0.000015778902,0.00007926839,0.9954486,0.00046537063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043669706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022642758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027527477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022216256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238657636","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1834","title":"Social Incentives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04028323500440672,"score_gpt":0.28911599617661304,"score_spread":0.24883276117220632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238657636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000037746955,0.00013601207,0.00018936319,0.0021385027,0.00047634915,0.00016569142,0.000030021805,0.00016253663,0.99666375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01825389,0.00057429227,0.00017340314,0.0011554053,0.0016346176,0.0000021400626,0.000034209934,0.000033096134,0.9781389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884915,0.000028033492,0.0001685199,0.0002893724,0.00043446646,0.00023044896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995658,0.000035498888,0.0000950444,0.0000868226,0.00009495164,0.00012189591],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012651969,0.0001820896,0.00024826988,0.000042185173,0.0004967287,0.00007569463,0.00029725351,0.0004139188,0.0013484618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021041245,0.00018567694,0.00016651415,0.000036767404,0.00035752027,0.00006603492,0.00008058123,0.00027292673,0.0005808084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021655933,0.000004364408,0.00010404748,0.0000070387377,0.000033489585,0.0000060104817,0.009202868,5.7564844e-8,0.0000011005142,0.9720356,0.017443636,0.0011596398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007267239,0.0000103664615,0.00029994047,0.0000069677185,0.000027902926,6.688341e-8,0.003498585,0.000003732836,1.6404138e-7,0.1332399,0.8625968,0.00024286899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022057646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010737096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8451532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031862385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239402263","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_101536","title":"Gender Gap Index","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.048733442326757546,"score_gpt":0.2802732377146182,"score_spread":0.23153979538786065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239402263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004759473,0.00018664675,0.005710911,0.00017249638,0.0010789008,0.00020025275,0.000013087536,0.00017140814,0.9924187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036172044,0.00064060884,0.0002507436,0.0013842231,0.0010522816,0.0000033658573,0.00002256519,0.000049077327,0.9604251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835557,0.00003610984,0.00023793489,0.00037404144,0.0006117922,0.0003845293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990964,0.00007054997,0.00012123871,0.00034717337,0.00016037289,0.00020428104],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040690324,0.00025867112,0.00029925152,0.0001103962,0.0003203787,0.0000862526,0.00040587102,0.00073584984,0.004095507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027449767,0.0002447338,0.0001693154,0.000032690186,0.0002851594,0.000046980498,0.00007109474,0.00033046422,0.0010835418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013598024,0.0000040031273,0.00082299556,0.00001041095,0.000034204913,0.0000034249915,0.0018524764,0.0000028480472,3.8925407e-7,0.9804675,0.015264215,0.001536191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093425646,0.000009999709,0.0007077808,0.000009871283,0.000027100492,4.8930474e-7,0.0008480291,0.000036166486,6.151805e-8,0.15958127,0.83835214,0.00033365926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068281253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031292131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82308793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011898514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035103445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239551403","doi":"10.4095/301150","title":"Female Median Income (1995$)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.04601399354884545,"score_gpt":0.3385777792932487,"score_spread":0.2925637857444033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239551403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023272572,0.00028051485,0.000118295524,0.00040527628,0.011434614,0.0003121179,0.000058472255,0.00023432463,0.9638838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29962784,0.010981206,0.0025785142,0.000503181,0.008212853,0.00004741714,0.00023139818,0.00010783957,0.67770976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674875,0.00009819743,0.0003898087,0.00045791655,0.001693344,0.00061200483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816555,0.00013037947,0.00022108511,0.00051837583,0.0005884831,0.00037609888],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018437814,0.00027154997,0.000449801,0.00017941535,0.00049841957,0.0001451294,0.000697972,0.0013623822,0.0018709587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006522153,0.00024392594,0.00020009222,0.00034813897,0.0004092854,0.000110477995,0.000115072195,0.00090650166,0.0004074772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065663053,0.00026836304,0.7450491,0.00041391663,0.0003133548,0.00021938045,0.05568915,0.0000025866623,0.00004760991,0.044382103,0.1281653,0.025442539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080394726,0.0000139661815,0.02555353,0.00002601723,0.00004091975,0.0000037222812,0.00901632,0.0000051486904,0.0000011390616,0.0015270449,0.9633313,0.00040049534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032564715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1606827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.835166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003324197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049701524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239594968","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-54775-2","title":"Sustainable Birth in Disruptive Times","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Global maternal and child health","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Politics; Human sexuality; Health care; Power (physics); Business; Political science; Development economics; Economic growth; Environmental health; Economics; Sociology; Medicine; Gender studies; Population","score_opus":0.007690702996647777,"score_gpt":0.27678381854208184,"score_spread":0.2690931155454341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239594968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028565828,0.0144349495,0.000016010315,0.002719586,0.0005073681,0.0004455455,0.0004477284,0.000061488165,0.9528015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031751778,0.02490718,0.00008127221,0.002424946,0.00062386703,0.000007663002,0.000077441095,0.000020098672,0.94010574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980671,0.0001475326,0.00029243794,0.0003863805,0.00036470313,0.0007418674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993052,0.000017653887,0.00016096285,0.0001342396,0.00009202406,0.00028992438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037251698,0.00022626875,0.00043057426,0.00005753996,0.0005030365,0.00014316002,0.00020318569,0.00024719638,0.00013095647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015488333,0.00021763718,0.000064958214,0.00016026145,0.0001728558,0.00009171476,0.00013318742,0.00030206062,0.000021053267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029599403,0.000050261446,0.0731866,0.000793112,0.000036897123,0.0002424947,0.007880984,0.000004962092,6.044642e-9,0.90377116,0.0103239585,0.0036799803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047028408,0.00010959526,0.16682644,0.0005728014,0.000011352636,0.00002072036,0.016494568,0.000007935032,2.8483345e-8,0.08315198,0.73194754,0.0003867655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019811176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014710264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82061917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010427812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020947915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.986716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239750180","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.42.6.927","title":"Judith Treas and Sonja Drobniè, Eds. <b>Dividing The Domestic: Men, Women, and Household Work in a Cross-National Perspective.</b> Stanford: Stanford University Press","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Work (physics); Gender studies; Art; Engineering","score_opus":0.13532816172292042,"score_gpt":0.35846371251147513,"score_spread":0.2231355507885547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239750180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97769296,0.0070345346,0.00018438352,0.00026385768,0.00021436854,0.00022392561,0.000029847153,0.000014735037,0.014341365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899025,0.008618604,0.0004233322,0.00007626196,0.00011272443,0.0000031311406,2.1263607e-7,0.0000076281076,0.0008556197],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981996,0.00031728967,0.00035047875,0.00019962431,0.0005757235,0.00035728439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997928,0.0005291462,0.0003889673,0.00008056172,0.00094032864,0.00013298908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014193854,0.00019841088,0.00048418602,0.0001692072,0.00082609284,0.00010739646,0.00026451075,0.00006253808,0.0000022244558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018087776,0.00014405334,0.000059356826,0.0004356351,0.0009556898,0.00057018653,0.0001319486,0.0003127064,3.6594065e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066197285,0.00018969623,0.25416023,0.000018256464,0.00061547995,0.000044565877,0.68421733,0.00027496653,0.000012528096,0.05590174,0.0037380059,0.00016519632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081700855,0.00013692112,0.47883445,0.00004216806,0.00003146954,0.0000037797197,0.5114493,0.000026102793,0.0000013765754,0.004713797,0.003809276,0.0001343812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041822178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000604521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22467421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000285482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63537216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240049968","doi":"10.1002/pam.1025.abs","title":"Moving Up, Moving Out, or Going Nowhere? A Study of the Employment Patterns of Young Women and the Implications for Welfare Mothers","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Annie E. Casey Foundation","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Welfare; National Longitudinal Surveys; Welfare reform; Welfare system; Work (physics); Labour economics; Demographic economics; Single mothers; Longitudinal data; Economics; Public policy; Business; Psychology; Sociology; Economic growth; Demography","score_opus":0.02487727975704034,"score_gpt":0.3229179691457291,"score_spread":0.2980406893886888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240049968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897851,0.000072559946,0.004600935,0.004496063,0.000052597064,0.00041058645,0.000010492738,0.0000025551071,0.0005691608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970479,0.0013785542,0.000100071724,0.00014511457,0.000066417655,0.000020152649,2.3052394e-7,0.000006043205,0.0012355164],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883187,0.00014813099,0.00045377942,0.00010962382,0.00026515446,0.00019142914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897105,0.00009610174,0.00056132424,0.0001883807,0.00012367687,0.000059455542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001202934,0.00008698701,0.00030415683,0.0002543078,0.00042858682,0.00006574155,0.00027520186,0.000023080294,0.00000829373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006608196,0.000047765207,0.00015862656,0.0005548621,0.000086091335,0.00008238342,0.00010564305,0.000056425997,2.6599924e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010094011,0.00023489939,0.7930287,0.000062550906,0.003262895,0.0000011134061,0.17651154,0.0009467192,0.000020262733,0.018477209,0.000049034006,0.0073041245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012890318,0.00009629428,0.68107426,0.00002235655,0.0011480417,9.797419e-7,0.31350097,0.000631076,6.902004e-7,0.0009859691,0.0011793273,0.00007097423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040550856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017764967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13698943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010229819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034069883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241334353","doi":"10.3138/cpp.35.4.389","title":"Taxes, Transfers, and Canadian Income Inequality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Undoing; Labour economics; Transfer payment; Inequality; Gross income; Income distribution; Economic inequality; State income tax; Income tax; Income inequality metrics; Tax reform; Public economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.02675285249187233,"score_gpt":0.2816017451127977,"score_spread":0.25484889262092536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241334353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6296673,0.00023590865,0.000024711544,0.13118105,0.0002692154,0.00030940358,0.0009778566,0.000076286226,0.23725827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98278886,0.00017587068,0.000047685724,0.014932193,0.00047479192,0.000004885187,0.000036162153,0.000011579006,0.0015279768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979026,0.00015418045,0.00019016299,0.0002678156,0.00020932581,0.0012759313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955661,0.000027515638,0.000026489653,0.00025579848,0.00010962449,0.004014432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061209593,0.00015321664,0.00017735525,0.0008385978,0.0010056576,0.00030441638,0.0003841479,0.00023699102,0.00009423622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039061482,0.00017677402,0.00004574256,0.0010492513,0.0002555835,0.00032318733,0.0000063607113,0.00019405,0.000023949036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.135566e-7,0.0000071377367,0.06803438,0.00000430817,0.000011210951,0.000019236313,0.0074994373,4.009523e-7,0.000002850803,0.8959116,0.006164443,0.022344412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019117311,0.000029868288,0.511663,0.000004568565,0.000005496637,0.000003239442,0.0022725002,0.000019177023,2.7868816e-7,0.015088553,0.4704534,0.0002686767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99810153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99980044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.880823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015552455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020960314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98458993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242140863","doi":"10.4095/301357","title":"Marital Status, 2001: Divorced (by census division)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Division (mathematics); Marital status; Geography; Psychology; Demography; Regional science; Sociology; Mathematics; Population; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.03411974083124514,"score_gpt":0.3224623345542506,"score_spread":0.28834259372300547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242140863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018699178,0.00088576437,0.00024421047,0.00033366456,0.00775967,0.00051518803,0.0013439341,0.0003223589,0.969896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17092694,0.024053799,0.0020920446,0.00041247063,0.0023316657,0.00003748213,0.0024497858,0.00015122585,0.7975446],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99503547,0.00014723276,0.00053010025,0.00069158716,0.0022838588,0.0013117674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975853,0.00019148953,0.00029572338,0.00047028123,0.00081163156,0.00064556114],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013988918,0.0004221583,0.0005650752,0.00013423797,0.00077135774,0.00028185782,0.00064062455,0.0014082892,0.0021437209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085109886,0.00037896595,0.00025926947,0.00035181412,0.00045135006,0.00015883741,0.00022371607,0.001105811,0.00016442765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003900625,0.00013314692,0.05994,0.00005024705,0.0000845219,0.000028634624,0.0015952515,9.097457e-7,0.000059750593,0.0031618038,0.92563313,0.009308729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016369131,0.000026521253,0.03176064,0.00002020571,0.00004852317,0.0000016852509,0.0035003677,0.000015245055,9.608065e-7,0.00057673303,0.963338,0.0005474165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08051507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043183986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17235145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048420133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032327275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243212481","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/x6ph4","title":"Decline in Marriage Associated with the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Metropolitan area; Cohabitation; Demography; Closure (psychology); Demographic economics; Outbreak; Government (linguistics); Geography; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Political science; Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Economics; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.07713733899052433,"score_gpt":0.33923428053169596,"score_spread":0.26209694154117164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243212481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9257076,0.00010436843,0.0013956792,0.06357282,0.00020309097,0.0011358135,0.0001270109,0.00016803648,0.0075855944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96050566,0.0011801472,0.00006219973,0.03688272,0.00009051048,0.000077803,0.0005600645,0.00002002203,0.0006208427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961921,0.0019001685,0.00035371227,0.0004253003,0.00066700776,0.00046170974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728745,0.0019026338,0.00021484667,0.00035512794,0.000099909004,0.00014005821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039921403,0.00025039358,0.00033158128,0.00015223432,0.0003046127,0.00021848593,0.0013046593,0.00037857294,0.000069739894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015188103,0.00013547331,0.000068644375,0.0015568455,0.0003782269,0.000035498368,0.00036962904,0.0012398378,0.000006680918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045778757,0.00011712941,0.79020965,0.000029940093,0.00006884636,0.00005566639,0.18357532,0.01317045,0.0000017440033,0.008583732,0.0040505356,0.00009123434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019540044,0.000085501975,0.42441446,0.00007997149,0.000096790245,0.0000014691211,0.41649118,0.014809096,1.7340683e-7,0.06941532,0.071846,0.00080604915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10663137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63049793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52386653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005159067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011871925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8993176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243673869","doi":"10.4095/301368","title":"Marital Status, 2006: Divorced (by census division)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Division (mathematics); Geography; Marital status; Demography; Sociology; Mathematics; Population; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.02646397584800037,"score_gpt":0.31264444957807896,"score_spread":0.2861804737300786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243673869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01739874,0.0011500155,0.0002675421,0.00030078055,0.007889316,0.00051671674,0.001987932,0.00032633482,0.97016263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21276796,0.01727958,0.0015270633,0.0003776786,0.0022248018,0.000035584264,0.0024615105,0.00014273674,0.7631831],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952034,0.00014112687,0.000532163,0.00068781944,0.002288724,0.0011467725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768156,0.00018206442,0.00029763475,0.00046768336,0.00081054156,0.0005605082],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012043496,0.00042102515,0.0005558804,0.0001347637,0.0007716524,0.0002898433,0.0006234048,0.0014019628,0.0016311797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071954686,0.00037749484,0.00025905654,0.00034680503,0.00045362068,0.00015752918,0.0002231331,0.001093079,0.00016489027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004844066,0.00016387239,0.08147095,0.00006569494,0.00010418833,0.000034298642,0.0021276183,0.000001225451,0.00006131676,0.005271263,0.8965028,0.01419196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016407117,0.000025355364,0.0324062,0.000020124351,0.000048283644,0.000001564974,0.0033723097,0.000010538718,0.0000010562393,0.00059908745,0.96280634,0.0005450472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08096039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03880363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20697953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043505695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00286127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243745314","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_100588","title":"Cohabitation Gap","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03542945652670217,"score_gpt":0.27965412227404324,"score_spread":0.24422466574734106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243745314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007324186,0.0000848177,0.003243701,0.0003525862,0.0007947114,0.00016563502,0.000009202654,0.00011853504,0.99515754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009939107,0.00039417643,0.0005534231,0.0007107128,0.00058341015,0.0000026863904,0.00004224098,0.000024696137,0.9877495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990415,0.000026966618,0.00016056262,0.00021164073,0.00036982057,0.00018953042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999397,0.00008674845,0.000096086675,0.00016943667,0.00015415275,0.00009658307],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032240723,0.00013973133,0.00017318023,0.000064936685,0.00022978484,0.000056583893,0.00018761346,0.00037179058,0.0013196985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040020866,0.00013641427,0.00009041517,0.000020387088,0.00017266031,0.00003945674,0.000020913814,0.00014617799,0.00092690246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.633581e-7,0.0000019976608,0.00017585204,0.00000646854,0.000010957883,7.714976e-7,0.0016591524,0.0000015186708,8.230948e-7,0.9842541,0.01193955,0.0019480287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006339457,0.000016317206,0.00037781018,0.000014305182,0.000021607977,1.4224703e-7,0.0007806956,0.000026280635,9.6273084e-8,0.16906889,0.8294306,0.00019987088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004113695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040489626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81749105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084549945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015749641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243750818","doi":"10.1163/1872-5309_ewic_ewiccom_0074c","title":"Divorce and Custody: Contemporary Practices: Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.03768096077021404,"score_gpt":0.3013751908439523,"score_spread":0.26369423007373827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243750818","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020931964,0.00059626857,0.00001545023,0.0010854473,0.0014398305,0.00026317438,0.9447786,0.000036252448,0.05157562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029410976,0.001949763,0.000065370776,0.0043717744,0.0006938024,0.000012500345,0.97943646,0.000016230615,0.010513012],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981782,0.00028701528,0.00023511452,0.0003785336,0.0005815205,0.00033963783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835694,0.0004123665,0.00047453115,0.00037140696,0.00011249041,0.00027227463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006536551,0.00021846384,0.00031315116,0.0000500903,0.00046331956,0.0001626241,0.0004549685,0.00033513334,0.0002147616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006562608,0.00019717231,0.000031366,0.00013761345,0.0002220948,0.00016218482,0.00010738258,0.0003476609,0.000027103619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028215375,0.000012839297,0.0009975146,0.000053260952,0.000027376062,0.000016746038,0.00025817656,2.9274634e-7,8.4531635e-8,0.0007421982,0.99784607,0.00004263508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011698984,0.000014310257,0.00036076593,0.000016679754,0.000034557605,0.0000010631071,0.006753274,0.000008010701,3.2489694e-8,0.00007694859,0.99234205,0.0002753371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04106261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014636136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043046367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8040454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W424443728","doi":"","title":"Resisting Two-Year Limits on Welfare in British Columbia","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Social Policy / Revue canadienne de politique sociale","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020885868300943144,"score_gpt":0.2767667392507298,"score_spread":0.2558808709497867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W424443728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70340323,0.019559242,0.00000131325,0.16913836,0.001384557,0.0013670032,0.0041286666,0.000050085462,0.10096754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9335914,0.037309643,0.00015335545,0.01585638,0.0050949035,0.00009394372,0.00012930184,0.0001321118,0.0076389364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99336237,0.00091652473,0.001162815,0.00072703825,0.00029307266,0.0035382046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959303,0.00011418846,0.00056302367,0.00038907139,0.0006410343,0.0023623663],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002111635,0.000402708,0.0012788177,0.00035716515,0.0018765155,0.00022301606,0.00084731804,0.00080963975,0.00038209817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031875183,0.00082969747,0.00054638827,0.0028003333,0.0013599944,0.00023587489,0.000044751043,0.00094360154,0.000035293575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002213461,0.00009084007,0.009359794,0.0059515685,0.0000746336,0.00037151013,0.02297886,0.000015063424,0.0000025217912,0.94463927,0.007080751,0.009432969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019827534,0.00020206536,0.3870922,0.027550312,0.00028071585,0.00007632564,0.060388263,0.0000043799105,0.0000016843089,0.11201947,0.4084257,0.0019761312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8326198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020692088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020117573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244731961","doi":"10.1353/cpp.2011.0019","title":"Estimating the Effects of Cigarette Taxes on Birth Outcomes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; The Renaissance; Politics; Slavic languages; Social science; Classics; Media studies; History; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Economic history; Art history; Law","score_opus":0.02807171501096364,"score_gpt":0.27252895860086485,"score_spread":0.2444572435899012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244731961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84486955,0.000047914713,0.000036817466,0.008254644,0.0007888577,0.00026657767,0.00007741008,0.000047033398,0.14561121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924406,0.000010472805,0.0001451364,0.004947179,0.00026315177,0.000015384205,0.0000025435497,0.00001423216,0.002161336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870324,0.00013610999,0.00015041299,0.0001510862,0.00023776574,0.0006214005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988149,0.00019135122,0.000087983004,0.00030684777,0.00008422815,0.0005146878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039263236,0.000113322036,0.00014951358,0.00031970235,0.0005622767,0.00006861785,0.00053876283,0.00009979273,0.000047833237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021707783,0.00008572435,0.0000698984,0.00059581717,0.00033394698,0.00012575298,0.000021619888,0.00013656853,0.00001760986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.9607063e-7,0.00001953241,0.20658354,0.00002409289,0.00004625348,0.00000711162,0.028278599,0.0000017934423,0.0000031953928,0.7499172,0.004889725,0.0102282725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025584665,0.00006854164,0.948143,0.000027703714,0.000016959702,9.040642e-7,0.0035956467,0.00015031923,0.000014505867,0.014942642,0.032519907,0.0002640363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7439039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6965744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74155945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002537877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030942408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.548905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244739109","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14636850","title":"Review [untitled]","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Democracy; State (computer science); Political science; Art; Humanities; Theology; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04772907769980402,"score_gpt":0.33738898118583116,"score_spread":0.28965990348602716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244739109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006769511,0.114177816,0.0013081304,0.0030091156,0.0027476847,0.000501246,0.000016257629,0.00019185507,0.8712784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038300946,0.88158107,0.005042676,0.015524922,0.0009076813,0.00005522613,0.00018901793,0.000033706863,0.058364756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987289,0.00017428219,0.00020863682,0.00033323292,0.00030827743,0.00024670764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915,0.00003429402,0.000081865604,0.00041272584,0.0002134156,0.00010770367],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005844679,0.00013476178,0.0002988797,0.000027601496,0.00015887574,0.00013225432,0.00040045177,0.00025727443,0.0064310827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018455715,0.00012889373,0.0001813471,0.00017479215,0.000088974724,0.000038008315,0.00035203295,0.00033856943,0.00025067054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018095466,0.00028726054,0.042009134,0.010176653,0.00026734298,0.00007686572,0.025241343,0.000049839047,0.00001490859,0.17295836,0.734712,0.014204482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073940595,0.000005342687,0.0034844186,0.002953535,0.00013006935,7.698142e-7,0.010028506,0.000050659073,0.0000017083992,0.004687027,0.9780285,0.00055556727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050919997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005768366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8129136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091588474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008133373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99447715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245938744","doi":"10.3386/w27210","title":"Collateralized Marriage","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Collateralized debt obligation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.36944911245876805,"score_gpt":0.5288992137040535,"score_spread":0.1594501012452854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245938744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032932463,0.0003692694,0.000003794873,0.0023799324,0.001321557,0.00062774634,0.00026302168,0.000031254476,0.9917102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8691765,0.009305469,0.00041118194,0.000113984555,0.0045062336,0.00011209293,0.000981283,0.000076659875,0.115316615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99498314,0.0005172325,0.0006474079,0.000523779,0.0027949358,0.0005334867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957779,0.000893503,0.00028588556,0.00023071042,0.0025616116,0.000250412],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007195422,0.00018369521,0.00052042666,0.00050316035,0.00040653543,0.00014891932,0.00082588353,0.00057998043,0.0015931622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024007421,0.0002032726,0.00021481994,0.00037235557,0.0005664185,0.00014217207,0.00018301891,0.0006922267,0.00036759817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004911461,0.0000564199,0.00714357,0.00015223837,0.00023281292,0.000009154548,0.0022466343,0.00010052863,0.00003543173,0.66977453,0.31988576,0.0003138189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006088167,0.000074423595,0.0041745086,0.000068943744,0.00002075998,0.0000027647661,0.0019327851,0.00029316306,0.000008307813,0.4315341,0.5609202,0.00036122714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01283387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004731332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87639356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028031839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016666569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246833319","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/kqfd7","title":"The Unintended Effect of Paternity Leave on Union Stability: Evidence from the Quebec Parental Insurance Program","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Work (physics); Unintended consequences; Population; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.04093799986842667,"score_gpt":0.3185664347639493,"score_spread":0.27762843489552264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246833319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98956823,0.00041143695,0.00018667644,0.0011692819,0.0025572039,0.002551856,0.00020640633,0.00013775786,0.003211145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766743,0.0011614796,0.000046521847,0.000054107455,0.00020987367,0.00012550155,0.000053530337,0.000017888337,0.00066364807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944769,0.0031800605,0.0004139166,0.00059170264,0.0009115765,0.00042582315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99477416,0.0033858162,0.00035810043,0.0011724113,0.00022300195,0.00008650236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033092364,0.0003279703,0.00043146795,0.000022140057,0.0005208214,0.00027248875,0.0014942876,0.0003605332,0.000039830044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081978657,0.00016708711,0.00026440466,0.00015179499,0.0013248575,0.0001050493,0.00056187686,0.0008401222,0.000034131608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015563087,0.000093244285,0.95844686,0.0000739704,0.00009105641,8.719554e-7,0.014252859,0.00020011772,0.000032005835,0.0018532997,0.0002008048,0.02459926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002979885,0.0003410841,0.9735971,0.0005389133,0.00006562347,9.932216e-8,0.019919623,0.00087279524,0.00037115658,0.0024661317,0.0011751174,0.00035435584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43853897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4226045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024244905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004525013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007227755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6813615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248608957","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.317701","title":"Economic and Social Status in Household Decision Making: Evidence from Extended Family Mobility","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Social mobility; Socioeconomic status; Demographic economics; Public economics; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Demography; Social science","score_opus":0.03579358190278777,"score_gpt":0.29432691531894234,"score_spread":0.2585333334161546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248608957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98906344,0.0076733655,0.0017157516,0.00032902122,0.00034509992,0.0001473996,0.000015296659,0.00003304595,0.0006775907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671858,0.031974968,0.00023308546,0.00011903813,0.00034661658,0.000003831276,9.234738e-7,0.000017105831,0.00011864267],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996573,0.00028723592,0.00038053648,0.00035006698,0.0003391769,0.0020700404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923277,0.0003100977,0.00016386574,0.00014221991,0.000041615454,0.000109452936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002153864,0.00016228868,0.00024605496,0.00012042037,0.0006080076,0.00017949424,0.0003300222,0.00017405293,0.000056538036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013937487,0.000165616,0.000086256114,0.00016171846,0.00019424982,0.00048555146,0.00005474734,0.0011754354,0.000017136688],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002621328,0.00036183483,0.6692924,0.000009250528,0.000109563836,0.000024294943,0.051744536,0.0004374357,0.0003565068,0.07071975,0.0004709941,0.20621131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087770924,0.00012698825,0.6196089,0.000050062456,0.000027874235,0.000009853342,0.04207828,0.0013025226,0.0000010260377,0.33467978,0.0009116383,0.00032538286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033277585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061734296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26396003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026807983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013871796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9553866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249792533","doi":"10.4095/301011","title":"Median Total Income of Individuals, 2000$ (by census division)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Division (mathematics); Geography; Demography; Demographic economics; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Mathematics; Economics; Arithmetic; Population","score_opus":0.025749678616652578,"score_gpt":0.3118715932206206,"score_spread":0.286121914603968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249792533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17852785,0.0011188685,0.0001279234,0.0004629631,0.007723046,0.00059666246,0.002647844,0.00017158155,0.80862325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86084604,0.005709371,0.0017344452,0.00012164157,0.0016040765,0.000023800747,0.0011306775,0.00009332635,0.1287366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954698,0.00015348812,0.000689361,0.00048202698,0.0025815885,0.00062373653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976911,0.0002368483,0.0005077879,0.0004249557,0.0007501875,0.0003891501],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021141432,0.0003301837,0.00067630876,0.0002067092,0.00034161264,0.00008113052,0.0007130211,0.0014023301,0.0010398123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008395708,0.00028998408,0.00023703199,0.0004468913,0.0005627751,0.00011984086,0.00022182704,0.00087894837,0.000044801578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006609317,0.000646176,0.5895875,0.00039103697,0.00050060573,0.000041503175,0.023270696,0.000005003727,0.0001694196,0.009310661,0.33880836,0.037262406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029363524,0.000061647166,0.24274264,0.00008120458,0.00010628521,0.0000050757567,0.0058424897,0.000010089095,0.000009459462,0.0018367935,0.74826044,0.00075026153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032489322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01423134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6823182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028839352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004094368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249815019","doi":"10.5040/9781350220041","title":"Female Well-Being","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Zed Books Ltd","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; History; Sociology; Development economics; Economics","score_opus":0.016875174799699945,"score_gpt":0.2653833740052852,"score_spread":0.24850819920558528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249815019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067815126,0.0006764856,0.00009290297,0.00021238101,0.001186967,0.00036408036,0.000018783483,0.0002541017,0.99651617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026096022,0.00078366086,0.00044058112,0.0010525268,0.0029723747,0.000011881828,0.00006716509,0.00007517212,0.99198705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977301,0.00011250476,0.0003413639,0.00048868504,0.00066879834,0.0006585454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988774,0.000120332814,0.00019849151,0.00043094813,0.00013934473,0.00023348354],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055689976,0.00033301246,0.00042414712,0.00014160045,0.00065344316,0.00015922956,0.0006208055,0.00071611797,0.0007787733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005078445,0.00035993647,0.00024530955,0.00007655441,0.00033258979,0.00011118788,0.0000997801,0.0005590477,0.001329406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015955975,0.00006164811,0.0007797885,0.000094639494,0.00015711629,0.00007818313,0.054039367,0.000016147373,0.000023597462,0.77770466,0.15813005,0.008898818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020768044,0.000016962878,0.00016719512,0.00007211649,0.00006445634,0.0000011268744,0.0021124182,0.000011486132,0.0000021766525,0.016478293,0.9804293,0.00043679753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003712381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023316063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82229924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005257697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012879696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249952552","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_101215","title":"Social Yield","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Yield (engineering); Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.054516212015663375,"score_gpt":0.2952321713678314,"score_spread":0.24071595935216805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249952552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013629353,0.00006577845,0.00015941513,0.00063956814,0.0009236015,0.00014416593,0.000019967934,0.00014528364,0.9977659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004667213,0.00026989914,0.00015127099,0.0009024844,0.0034434493,0.0000020568416,0.000014180728,0.000031934967,0.9905175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987991,0.000014772208,0.00017325422,0.00026948837,0.00044053828,0.00030286197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943435,0.000056181747,0.000092489245,0.00015177386,0.00016550002,0.00009973093],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002512766,0.00018338377,0.00022219356,0.00006121734,0.0005997864,0.000075108685,0.00032088193,0.0006957478,0.012550279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031387837,0.00018051108,0.00015919465,0.000027463035,0.0004924285,0.000055350803,0.00005980367,0.00022251788,0.0016079439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001458969,0.0000042759852,0.00005049191,0.000004067788,0.000024243376,0.000002634614,0.007366728,1.7581574e-8,7.389036e-7,0.8501887,0.14170198,0.00065467856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004019256,0.000016109856,0.00010679991,0.000010289494,0.000025593867,1.6338535e-7,0.0019966315,0.0000013352296,2.1185609e-7,0.14161494,0.85594964,0.00023806411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061601715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006976891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7142477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009823084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030064097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250424155","doi":"10.3138/cpp.36.1.107","title":"Home Cooking, Food Consumption, and Food Production among Retired Canadian Households","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Food away from home; Food consumption; Food processing; Calorie; Economics; Production (economics); Consumer Expenditure Survey; Agricultural economics; Environmental health; Food science; Medicine; Aggregate expenditure; Public economics; Biology","score_opus":0.028488615950597738,"score_gpt":0.25100370212004475,"score_spread":0.222515086169447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250424155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9620863,0.00009116349,0.0000027158383,0.016273329,0.0012743584,0.0003887125,0.00028949598,0.00010634791,0.019487528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99544996,0.00011891572,0.00003806528,0.0014981993,0.0012157826,0.000029660096,0.00004322763,0.000035001896,0.001571189],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783105,0.00010047054,0.00020422769,0.0004111291,0.00024317992,0.0012099261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962834,0.000023010452,0.000078709636,0.00038557948,0.00023384944,0.0029954347],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005869721,0.00018295614,0.00017013904,0.0008335507,0.0015041394,0.0004471567,0.00036067743,0.00036882306,0.00008819089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083630544,0.0002199082,0.000042799853,0.00082237227,0.00083921914,0.00047733888,0.000019355728,0.00036046782,0.00002154461],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.835681e-7,0.000007995343,0.72192645,0.000010506689,0.000030134752,0.0000033242725,0.005727684,4.6335518e-7,0.000017014028,0.2588849,0.011222779,0.002168245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017862518,0.00003662393,0.7299335,0.000005930851,0.000010528227,0.000009005124,0.0013446594,0.000013103571,0.000002302808,0.002829166,0.26533636,0.0003001692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97227997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99984956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25605574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085157156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013011603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250680083","doi":"10.2307/1515155","title":"How an Earnings Supplement Can Affect Union Formation among Low-Income Single Mothers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Earnings; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Welfare; Marital status; Economics; Welfare reform; Single mothers; Demography; Population; Psychology; Geography; Sociology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.01196285132157883,"score_gpt":0.2403952843843287,"score_spread":0.22843243306274985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250680083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885381,0.00003387313,0.005554896,0.00037675205,0.00034270063,0.00032218202,0.000017179736,0.0001220314,0.0046922793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855,0.00004893324,0.0009436039,0.00010327868,0.0000647476,0.000015177984,0.00004956095,0.000017409915,0.0002072754],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984024,0.0004533436,0.00013678847,0.00021169297,0.00037076656,0.00042498767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940014,0.00003694389,0.00011519398,0.00018491084,0.000080293015,0.00018250427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007649337,0.00013725487,0.0001294356,0.00023119658,0.0005296943,0.00021468716,0.0001767175,0.00011196216,0.000031220745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004760887,0.00013911282,0.00011094175,0.00076748943,0.00018091605,0.00050880236,0.000010608166,0.000113790804,0.0000023833372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002579947,0.00008217585,0.9676956,0.000017350332,0.000021742624,0.0000017672725,0.021189159,0.000068859554,0.00037519055,0.009358788,0.00027669448,0.0009101252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007940892,0.00032707263,0.8543236,0.000040972176,0.000050077135,0.0000011778222,0.10407235,0.0005007348,0.00040688628,0.002702957,0.03619033,0.0005897069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011281518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010269365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11337192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088304085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040872423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5730547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250995688","doi":"10.1787/9789264303560-7-en","title":"Policy vision and framework","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"OECD development co-operation peer reviews","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04700408883664628,"score_gpt":0.355683858391696,"score_spread":0.3086797695550497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250995688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020281781,0.0072705597,0.0033796395,0.0029574158,0.000992978,0.0017165641,0.000033419383,0.0001194574,0.98332715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00015348871,0.05418184,0.016123112,0.0033217475,0.0013956372,0.000053163007,0.0004004902,0.00006237004,0.9243081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972165,0.00014504777,0.0008015509,0.0005895761,0.00088248326,0.00036483805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872506,0.00006872406,0.00031737023,0.00036582723,0.000272617,0.00025043404],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019021333,0.0004380694,0.00062764523,0.0002141768,0.0009791406,0.0003784896,0.0003014806,0.00062848674,0.0043406445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023334096,0.00037808725,0.000109064444,0.00005072189,0.00026550682,0.00022827754,0.000095766445,0.00035641604,0.005001611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007642857,0.000034676694,0.00041127796,0.0001930053,0.000070433205,0.0000050164786,0.042649783,7.8359875e-7,0.000009964301,0.67479736,0.14999796,0.13182212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009240913,0.000025354564,0.00037912384,0.0002642841,0.000023578668,0.0000013790791,0.00017366798,0.0000036036688,0.0000023034954,0.009309391,0.9892616,0.00046327597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044072778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004392344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8392637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032658462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012481486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251169702","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3104061","title":"Evidence on the Economic Consequences of Marriage Equality and LGBT Human Rights","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04378760877335166,"score_gpt":0.3241261722646671,"score_spread":0.2803385634913155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251169702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877001,0.00065692974,0.00019206962,0.0013754676,0.00024403851,0.00010830415,0.0000032608891,0.000011344841,0.009708509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99660337,0.0019809417,0.0000144184105,0.000112113725,0.00043320743,0.0000016818441,2.6605858e-7,0.000004984034,0.00084899564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979501,0.00045485143,0.00024680392,0.0001597991,0.00022977832,0.0009586621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992013,0.00027542742,0.0002113551,0.00015319022,0.00008631044,0.000072444396],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004776287,0.00009631109,0.00014344904,0.00004543857,0.0013875294,0.00008083563,0.00039746883,0.000069605725,0.00010890187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009655245,0.00006495636,0.000057004225,0.00008113256,0.0012429057,0.00017884093,0.00002561501,0.0005487485,0.00001806256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012894541,0.000009585013,0.0074444273,0.0000017232795,0.000036474336,4.7972713e-7,0.0029567652,0.0000012946718,0.00047179466,0.9887013,0.000059745424,0.00030350767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016306309,0.00040477834,0.007506502,0.00004491182,0.00002362795,0.000017233395,0.011181883,0.000016934528,0.00021771353,0.9792246,0.0010722764,0.00012647008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005370745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07319529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06782455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006014801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017604829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251445268","doi":"10.3138/cpp.36.4.503","title":"Implications of the Introduction of the Goods and Services Tax for Families in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Almost ideal demand system; Welfare; Goods and services; Economics; Demographic economics; Public economics; Survey data collection; Engel curve; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Production (economics); Aggregate expenditure; Economy","score_opus":0.010255453732197422,"score_gpt":0.2462392602606427,"score_spread":0.23598380652844528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251445268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91813916,0.00002140241,0.0000011394629,0.07594507,0.00032952646,0.00022327252,0.0003433668,0.0000018032192,0.0049952525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859923,0.000021287213,0.000022959493,0.000846882,0.00024193407,0.000016088092,0.000003838545,0.0000041220146,0.0002436527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994121,0.00003996457,0.0001230529,0.000092377966,0.00008972519,0.00024277809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993946,0.00003639432,0.00007568905,0.00024891453,0.00010697905,0.00013742891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019775846,0.000046688332,0.00007237497,0.00009991779,0.00028640486,0.000021697571,0.00037673046,0.0000516517,0.0000062815875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024724274,0.00003415321,0.000021974036,0.00064825476,0.00022582375,0.00006225076,0.000022611011,0.00008474241,5.993128e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.2610038e-7,0.0000043440004,0.4692533,0.000017981662,0.000006305937,1.1751145e-8,0.0042140014,0.0000036104818,0.0003433035,0.51973295,0.0027477893,0.0036760597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058060814,0.0000018260155,0.8572837,0.000001675557,0.000003332297,3.5072594e-7,0.008507916,0.000030488613,0.000017408947,0.004651592,0.12940474,0.00003888557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99949175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51508135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031429343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014920866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99066365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253814954","doi":"10.1017/9781108227407.005","title":"Importing Ideas","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Public economics; Law and economics; Economics; Accounting; Computer science","score_opus":0.025469464902254206,"score_gpt":0.22976132528572182,"score_spread":0.2042918603834676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253814954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001582517,0.00015417415,0.000187776,0.00002187189,0.0008421658,0.00044926596,0.00017118693,0.00019630975,0.99639475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0062573776,0.00030354023,0.000069625414,0.0001211697,0.0003153183,2.1312216e-7,0.000041434454,0.000046340505,0.992845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825245,0.00006490474,0.0002209615,0.00050970487,0.0004830488,0.00046890805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986235,0.00006854601,0.00035169648,0.00047829593,0.00023554078,0.00024240138],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029480865,0.00031155438,0.00039402038,0.00014864962,0.00055313617,0.0000780702,0.0006858575,0.0005989088,0.000013785788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026940972,0.00039900234,0.00026717267,0.000012631788,0.00038983254,0.00011497509,0.00028206265,0.0004947133,0.00006719617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010307586,0.000004390591,0.00012911999,0.000037489463,0.000075599906,0.000106215906,0.0008269284,0.0000024771086,0.000007869803,0.9850717,0.013362488,0.00036537394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028012277,0.000019247636,0.00021190637,0.00007824749,0.000143021,0.0000017040829,0.0015466446,0.000028610428,0.0000024429994,0.000084836676,0.9971265,0.00047671056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019264104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000104481325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9849869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037751047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006923134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253939816","doi":"10.24124/2003/bpgub273","title":"The Prince George Homebuilders Program: Was the intent fulfilled?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Art; Art history","score_opus":0.01729414364086411,"score_gpt":0.30340128302307884,"score_spread":0.2861071393822147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253939816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13481392,0.0018558231,0.000072723145,0.0026786493,0.0060779834,0.0024153604,0.000009020233,0.0002864477,0.8517901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0808676,0.010110026,0.00047818208,0.0008604437,0.00039285157,0.0005432376,0.00020383565,0.00007452844,0.9064693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735516,0.00029029005,0.00033514283,0.00037086298,0.0009852791,0.00066326343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984436,0.00022827148,0.00021484766,0.0004715933,0.0005157408,0.0001259723],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013454765,0.00027604366,0.00022023256,0.000045912104,0.0021752077,0.00045099377,0.0009883257,0.00034273253,0.00011960014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004028359,0.00014597764,0.00020950324,0.0004621951,0.00036638087,0.00007971151,0.00003080239,0.0004821755,0.0000704616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006161568,0.000340795,0.005648253,0.00008651259,0.00034916514,0.0000075586804,0.09046013,0.000016644386,0.000018602725,0.7447015,0.06250969,0.09579952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011171144,0.00003266255,0.006700085,0.000019654006,0.000049733033,4.2196862e-7,0.30947554,0.000033942593,0.000005006836,0.0026765782,0.680631,0.00026367043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022808574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.083011195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7420249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020436928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077055185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254089436","doi":"10.1787/tax_wages-2010-10-en","title":"Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Taxing wages","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social security; Payroll; Cash; Public economics; Government (linguistics); Economics; Cash transfers; Business; Labour economics; Finance; Accounting; Market economy","score_opus":0.032050018115367306,"score_gpt":0.24004510364364737,"score_spread":0.20799508552828005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254089436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00053740654,0.0007544453,0.00003773326,0.00020609619,0.0012481859,0.00012001919,0.0000733818,0.00007347654,0.99694926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06221376,0.0007876579,0.00011608164,0.00036623754,0.0005560438,0.0000024662136,0.000017606544,0.000038330552,0.9359018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988297,0.000022247927,0.00016391624,0.00024809077,0.00041099053,0.0003250614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999347,0.00005713616,0.00013097365,0.00023560798,0.00009037594,0.00013896431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019662439,0.00019318137,0.00022410825,0.000049816896,0.0003774547,0.000039508635,0.0003503091,0.0002673362,0.0008889764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003989605,0.00020171594,0.00006759284,0.000023373485,0.00016368626,0.00004315218,0.000049928953,0.00026320608,0.00007546632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001907056,0.0000047240355,0.00066321687,0.000025950465,0.00006041591,0.00009167362,0.0051262053,0.0000017080912,0.000002166752,0.9338696,0.056503706,0.0036487484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039993763,0.0000074255245,0.00089419255,0.000046753037,0.000028750705,7.288388e-7,0.00064997515,9.299906e-7,8.631432e-7,0.02536554,0.9726774,0.00028745312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8777021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95822346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9161737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024726067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017151844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9733668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254217835","doi":"10.4095/301010","title":"Median Total Income of Individuals, 2000$ (by census subdivision)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subdivision; Census; Geography; Statistics; Demography; Mathematics; Sociology; Archaeology; Population","score_opus":0.026290584135476455,"score_gpt":0.31157368875905517,"score_spread":0.2852831046235787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254217835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.203533,0.001202913,0.00008494933,0.0003998364,0.0077162706,0.00062591024,0.0027422893,0.00018093585,0.7835139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84068364,0.008551154,0.0016981728,0.00014798758,0.0022398194,0.0000275315,0.0014777952,0.000115749484,0.14505817],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952604,0.00016696063,0.00073062413,0.0005080923,0.0026710427,0.0006628882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750745,0.00024299527,0.00053739396,0.00044365626,0.00085823284,0.00041029238],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002362659,0.00034896677,0.0007128394,0.00022965092,0.0003391516,0.000085480824,0.0007409699,0.0015131059,0.0011581762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008503348,0.00031148174,0.0002470201,0.00048937777,0.00059156975,0.00012643654,0.00020083116,0.00093160395,0.000049974165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010242465,0.0006493255,0.5082093,0.00041987927,0.0004921718,0.000049083013,0.022010596,0.0000026119064,0.00016546951,0.015259412,0.42760223,0.025129711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003214897,0.00006595219,0.18485871,0.00007859652,0.00012767804,0.000008431791,0.006341635,0.000012770146,0.000014211096,0.0017918467,0.8055717,0.0008070109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037259437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017233843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63845575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032032607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004747386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254786956","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2617691","title":"Work and Female Health Autonomy: Evidence from the Demographic and Health Surveys","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Family planning; Demographic economics; Fertility; Work (physics); Psychology; Population; Medicine; Economics; Environmental health; Political science; Research methodology","score_opus":0.059276001039293674,"score_gpt":0.32619895035023844,"score_spread":0.26692294931094473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254786956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8504787,0.101262555,0.007475689,0.040051058,0.0003528488,0.00022645148,0.000004512524,0.000034500146,0.00011370767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9378741,0.060318664,0.00018993944,0.0010103574,0.00033376933,0.000002571207,0.0000020250034,0.000011486403,0.00025711468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957722,0.0015681715,0.00027419388,0.0002344334,0.00036391662,0.0017871248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884677,0.00026230808,0.00022594216,0.00015078763,0.00009460638,0.00041959522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019864824,0.00012923006,0.00022461664,0.000052283394,0.0012244488,0.00019852561,0.0002945014,0.00007032276,0.000003337859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017435302,0.00009636817,0.000043370663,0.00041460316,0.00026375696,0.00024300833,0.000047471443,0.0010842459,0.0000025474637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007649315,0.000016058168,0.9223745,0.0000025252748,0.000042147723,5.5102976e-7,0.023489635,0.0000070251044,2.5357954e-7,0.023152558,0.0002749209,0.030632174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039948293,0.00029744746,0.8263367,0.00006907577,0.0000132208115,0.000016193693,0.060356565,0.00003780688,5.6193382e-8,0.109295815,0.0030137526,0.0001638918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022271894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15598275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13371085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010866899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01633396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255866560","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_103808","title":"Sexual Economics Theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Psychology; Positive economics","score_opus":0.024008600848062677,"score_gpt":0.24930307343168423,"score_spread":0.22529447258362156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255866560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004791087,0.00010714672,0.0018865737,0.0001672435,0.0010471059,0.00015251053,0.000029217259,0.00011760045,0.9960135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004461889,0.0007117776,0.00025306962,0.0011315282,0.0010957947,0.0000022533454,0.000029746418,0.000043654967,0.9922703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989798,0.00004626116,0.00021576046,0.00032323253,0.00015039704,0.0002845599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918854,0.00016734748,0.00011969278,0.0003081573,0.00006973395,0.00014652431],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071070174,0.00021346749,0.00027155443,0.00006999859,0.0002701173,0.000079726706,0.00037182344,0.00053585094,0.0021555773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027529291,0.00021015835,0.00009661953,0.000011101203,0.00033934665,0.000046143847,0.00006229255,0.0002258677,0.0008750731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023123796,0.000002788713,0.00007019445,0.000005181711,0.00003254074,8.7369534e-7,0.0016159195,0.0000049690193,1.7463081e-7,0.98774606,0.0033971127,0.007121848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055112116,0.00001612583,0.000043859443,0.0000037898783,0.000022817661,2.8325496e-7,0.0016473391,0.000019467418,6.2389205e-8,0.3282907,0.66966873,0.00023174714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027464298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040976275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66627157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012528097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030044818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256026881","doi":"10.3138/cpp.35.1.21","title":"Fiscal Retrenchment and Social Assistance in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Social assistance; Population; Exploit; Chose; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Public administration; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.016956484298916438,"score_gpt":0.25744356169597504,"score_spread":0.2404870773970586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256026881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7144987,0.0001279225,0.0000025604465,0.1215773,0.00019153398,0.000115245675,0.00010535249,0.000015806974,0.1633656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98950946,0.000037018413,0.000022279286,0.008985713,0.0003195686,0.0000034474363,0.000012160296,0.000004399724,0.0011059741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986185,0.000073155476,0.00013721174,0.00018365527,0.0002213799,0.00076609966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917215,0.000018380644,0.00003259947,0.00009558284,0.000036011483,0.0006452768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021370493,0.00009113635,0.00012310063,0.0002341032,0.00044530898,0.00013399776,0.00020581884,0.00008758836,0.000034843382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010923543,0.000106868705,0.000017866998,0.00054847624,0.000101320315,0.00013254295,0.000008443986,0.00013302364,0.000002126785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010525272,0.000010378202,0.3074461,0.0000033291662,0.000005611808,0.000036097485,0.006352124,6.429793e-7,0.0000017570686,0.6179863,0.041344803,0.02681179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119933495,0.0000052539453,0.749842,0.0000020234581,0.0000011502998,6.025254e-7,0.0034604913,0.00003207835,9.200988e-8,0.0025553242,0.24386297,0.00011809381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.615431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044950396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030149546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280565369","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197601457.003.0006","title":"The Politics of Early Years and Family Policy Investments in North America","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Welfare state; Political economy; Politics; Ideology; Exceptionalism; Democracy; Public administration; State (computer science); Economics; Law","score_opus":0.02348697562507796,"score_gpt":0.26867940961455355,"score_spread":0.2451924339894756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280565369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16737118,0.0005566544,0.0000017348395,0.00023625743,0.00016502972,0.00023888245,0.00012464622,0.000019414265,0.8312862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16585737,0.012700664,0.00019919957,0.0022784015,0.00026353422,0.000014443352,0.000034824083,0.000055146986,0.8185964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987281,0.000058726593,0.00025708345,0.00019931201,0.00044657328,0.0003102352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993667,0.00011806234,0.00014221254,0.00021539307,0.000048038877,0.00010958644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016003639,0.0001434801,0.0002213191,0.00015916798,0.00028657826,0.000039396775,0.00032048658,0.00011758052,0.000051101488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038857077,0.00012578127,0.000059984646,0.00014601638,0.00068157475,0.000036955957,0.00015224115,0.00025134374,0.000008524082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024755348,0.000009771994,0.016134001,0.0000048298716,0.000027180358,0.0000046475598,0.011455448,0.0000035131427,3.341754e-7,0.9700104,0.00029546575,0.0020519276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019319293,0.00009171765,0.2740704,0.000009660365,0.000022378603,2.6933412e-7,0.010487894,0.000009460699,2.6894199e-8,0.06638952,0.6484606,0.00026483522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03843495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011938893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9036209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017505643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006418917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96796817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284678622","doi":"10.5070/t35156974","title":"Review of Gendered Lives: Global Issues, edited by Nadine T. Fernandez and Katie Nelson","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teaching and Learning Anthropology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Criminology; Media studies; History","score_opus":0.019165716939550295,"score_gpt":0.33505454278463787,"score_spread":0.3158888258450876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284678622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7146044,0.2682252,0.0007612468,0.0069973376,0.00088998827,0.00024188495,0.000056944227,0.00016710619,0.008055917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92084956,0.07627487,0.0003731531,0.0008625518,0.000148369,0.0000064192077,0.000051927273,0.00001210004,0.0014210283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969008,0.002061051,0.00023057603,0.00028163192,0.00021176215,0.00031418065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941206,0.00017035508,0.0001735153,0.00010329379,0.00003855597,0.00010221399],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018721257,0.00012547316,0.00032065975,0.00004143704,0.0023377198,0.000021074404,0.00014834556,0.00007020454,0.00025935585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006354414,0.00012892905,0.000037114176,0.00016194131,0.0007201315,0.00005562242,0.000119197444,0.00075518317,0.0000011631513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013169824,0.0006116867,0.33626047,0.0025089495,0.0003513335,0.0000468524,0.32481605,0.00019986712,0.00039029904,0.048222996,0.10415086,0.18230893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054902583,0.00060049683,0.0052006706,0.00027551228,0.000076238335,0.00002464322,0.19327253,0.00068827043,8.3088895e-7,0.0004972601,0.79850936,0.0003051708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03033851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000297023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69435847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008470638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074375224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285362896","doi":"10.1162/rest_a_01110","title":"Asymmetric Demand Response When Prices Increase and Decrease: The Case of Child Health Care","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economics and Statistics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Subsidy; Welfare; Demand management; Proposition; Microeconomics; Public economics; Macroeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.0173530253460495,"score_gpt":0.29585107736539445,"score_spread":0.27849805201934497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285362896","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.269721,0.7196089,0.00095330307,0.005737025,0.00010042739,0.0005238783,0.0014036626,0.0000048646966,0.0019469352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16798693,0.8264019,0.0038330632,0.0016756771,0.0000315228,0.0000045235465,0.000019966694,0.0000074011878,0.000039050337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987556,0.00054793566,0.00036778903,0.00013900103,0.000045401037,0.00014431996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980748,0.0011030949,0.0003080659,0.00023505805,0.00014917785,0.00012979112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002046994,0.000087944194,0.0003248362,0.000030198542,0.00040946144,0.00003530022,0.00012308094,0.000030244371,0.000013052068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011251057,0.000058726673,0.000035330955,0.00014266054,0.00029289647,0.00003553183,0.0000706366,0.00007672505,3.7158946e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082303224,0.00008247394,0.0022255494,0.0057791425,0.00016200753,0.000048027796,0.02804512,0.000023280543,4.521527e-7,0.808851,0.0038241982,0.15087642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026317602,0.00078525126,0.082876936,0.0054288525,0.0015601084,0.001170241,0.16429688,0.004469846,0.000010868173,0.071360245,0.6641165,0.0012924867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020263116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041695186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7374908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034748045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005586091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31492877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286438164","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2021-079","title":"Net Child Care Costs in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Factoring; Cash flow; Distribution (mathematics); Business; Child care; Public economics; Net income; Cash; Economics; Demographic economics; Finance; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.011490204440546123,"score_gpt":0.23738407350180152,"score_spread":0.2258938690612554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286438164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4677805,0.00046895488,5.10326e-7,0.036588434,0.0008413223,0.00026693472,0.0009641462,0.000027887429,0.4930613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861886,0.00003287442,0.000005174375,0.012346894,0.00030510488,0.00003884515,0.000101769365,0.000014876567,0.00096589705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811035,0.00018327404,0.00014222247,0.00021193949,0.00036051427,0.0009917152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986139,0.00002429101,0.00003606476,0.00021930161,0.00006396107,0.0010424952],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021351647,0.0000996745,0.00012018599,0.00047634178,0.001369766,0.00008576371,0.0005759101,0.000046636138,0.00036750623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018506029,0.00013104761,0.000028484332,0.0015089929,0.000076805285,0.00010793091,0.000055805696,0.00028200366,0.000007001111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010841197,0.000010376571,0.4958396,0.000006343926,0.000012692549,0.00010959002,0.023747507,0.00010692686,2.9781017e-7,0.393606,0.07120132,0.015358243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000136306,0.0000057549732,0.17088237,0.000001476067,0.0000012526591,0.0000024255492,0.072654575,0.00003115345,4.9199553e-8,0.00018620031,0.7559496,0.00014879882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99998814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6847483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021526761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10611961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286611311","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2022.102264","title":"Italy’s demographic trap: Voting for childcare subsidies and fertility outcomes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Voting; Trap (plumbing); Fertility; Economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Demography; Population; Geography; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.027102553967259743,"score_gpt":0.27131014297990774,"score_spread":0.244207589012648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286611311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95018834,0.00031802827,0.00082078663,0.004714801,0.0003778106,0.00013878543,0.000042542673,0.000019483352,0.04337945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979655,0.000008368739,0.00043545192,0.0012256999,0.00022451697,0.0000021234628,0.0000020180025,0.000016518625,0.00011981655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982996,0.0005186611,0.0004456743,0.00014850966,0.00014631827,0.00044121334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902123,0.00029441202,0.00016618552,0.00008094657,0.00011761004,0.0003196075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001914474,0.00010750994,0.00025077956,0.00011171764,0.0007418333,0.0000899707,0.0002773394,0.000016715507,0.000046432728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027745048,0.00010170009,0.00020870597,0.00008820195,0.0002747556,0.00016716575,0.00007728398,0.00025044722,0.0000015835711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022857514,0.00006863403,0.49556538,0.00001993513,0.00008315871,0.000021822958,0.0049578957,0.000012864052,0.000002450323,0.49820057,0.0001658961,0.0008785483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067684724,0.00020501914,0.9310741,0.0000069613156,0.000052264957,0.000016235157,0.03459097,0.00006992907,0.0000011982887,0.012585132,0.020554906,0.00016646081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003285524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043635224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48561543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008667986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001187158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5705657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287103774","doi":"","title":"Welfare versus Work under a Negative Income Tax: Evidence from the Gary, Seattle, Denver and Manitoba Income Maintenance Experiments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Work (physics); Economics; Income tax; Demographic economics; Public economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06671482043979567,"score_gpt":0.3460806363652107,"score_spread":0.27936581592541504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287103774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828363,0.0012863552,0.000014666815,0.002071454,0.0014949292,0.0010039833,0.00010756646,0.00004138962,0.011143326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9613297,0.035862386,0.00075809896,0.00017042251,0.00041105808,0.0002570603,0.00003576283,0.00005848941,0.0011170461],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99482214,0.0014168415,0.0005806964,0.0013420623,0.00071036635,0.0011278915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948564,0.003016146,0.0002496178,0.0012333546,0.00030462258,0.00033986807],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022089046,0.00042531296,0.0005939979,0.00017450843,0.0010418597,0.00096974795,0.0016687621,0.0006210936,0.0001431977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016814291,0.00039481345,0.00017702742,0.00040842962,0.0015830931,0.00049312797,0.0028102312,0.0020145245,0.00001040975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009391643,0.00024347226,0.89466166,0.00015274427,0.0008391067,0.00022171116,0.06689068,0.004330654,0.000031216063,0.0044722427,0.00015227885,0.027065057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012236044,0.0000686658,0.7192994,0.0012048841,0.000033428434,0.0000015172251,0.27130687,0.0009037014,0.000012574774,0.0028510431,0.0023129506,0.0007813796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019090043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06380441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20441619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002591301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012405438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287128507","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v14i1.72691","title":"Social Policy Trends: Home Alone","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.05523058924022788,"score_gpt":0.3555449252892272,"score_spread":0.3003143360489993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287128507","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06083353,0.00025276828,0.00049841235,0.5517929,0.00017993983,0.00017291734,0.00021060841,0.00025814213,0.38580078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93873465,0.00030932875,0.0003124658,0.0028978656,0.003473735,0.00007712858,0.0001361845,0.000028847893,0.05402979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969665,0.00065772876,0.00046787853,0.00033010106,0.000732476,0.00084534695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997189,0.00015712669,0.00027716544,0.0007971351,0.0010942364,0.0004853342],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013767896,0.000180971,0.0002832634,0.00087812333,0.0015811798,0.0005100283,0.001271563,0.0002028606,0.0007762912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039143893,0.00016100235,0.00023838566,0.0075787543,0.00082921336,0.00076047506,0.00022247873,0.00033007716,0.00015928622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010470138,0.00016357374,0.007384505,0.000004528062,0.000070920636,2.7186292e-7,0.0055765044,0.0000020055613,0.00012104623,0.93607134,0.0459787,0.004625547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039400934,0.000011150913,0.50649697,0.0000030191068,0.00003186182,0.0000042345805,0.008935655,0.000018987872,0.000010199685,0.057032824,0.4268332,0.00022788666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0118865995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004091153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8790385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004445014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008436808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288450873","doi":"10.7758/rsf.2022.8.5.04","title":"Families’ Job Characteristics and Economic Self-Sufficiency: Differences by Income, Race-Ethnicity, and Nativity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"W.K. Kellogg Foundation; Spencer Foundation","keywords":"Receipt; Immigration; Demographic economics; Ethnic group; Wage; Quarter (Canadian coin); Working poor; Income Support; Labour economics; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Population; Race (biology); Family income; Pension; Inequality; Economics; Poverty; Economic growth; Political science; Geography; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.018294273956768838,"score_gpt":0.2854251080986874,"score_spread":0.2671308341419185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288450873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98875785,0.00034255558,0.00016779698,0.006170288,0.0013313459,0.00019152072,0.000029671459,0.000016685011,0.002992274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997175,0.0017911206,0.0000704887,0.00027687222,0.00029308716,0.00000395369,6.666502e-7,0.0000060980624,0.0003827191],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713403,0.0011445328,0.00039861831,0.00020355979,0.0008081005,0.0003111733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852663,0.00048310732,0.00074377947,0.00009532221,0.00007122419,0.00007993402],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049580964,0.00013743102,0.0002507404,0.00008377419,0.008005741,0.00046555835,0.0010256127,0.00005595634,0.000098149554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001950579,0.00008853842,0.00009531135,0.0005259563,0.0017467025,0.0004360944,0.0003413601,0.00038146006,0.0000020892255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032602013,0.00021782465,0.72291553,0.00002350029,0.000115566494,0.0000022199938,0.18915325,0.00007475704,0.00045993252,0.069027826,0.0011079852,0.016869009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044351065,0.00021206416,0.85853046,0.000017878152,0.00011324178,0.000019320518,0.09953028,0.0017131573,0.0000072053367,0.017473213,0.021598326,0.00034136567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008805661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005390925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13561492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000265157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061278103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289822368","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4162092","title":"The Effect of Childcare Access on Women's Careers and Firm Performance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Human capital; Subsidy; Productivity; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Government (linguistics); Childbirth; Economics; Maternity leave; Business; Economic growth; Accounting","score_opus":0.005488397907534238,"score_gpt":0.2514750123275782,"score_spread":0.24598661442004394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289822368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994812,0.0017097029,0.000009226383,0.00039721487,0.0003343951,0.00013364277,0.000003854867,0.000011032236,0.002588916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922304,0.0068437867,7.0243317e-7,0.00006295881,0.0000965895,0.00001681788,9.920046e-7,0.000009173686,0.0007385719],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769354,0.00029704068,0.0001317279,0.00011375966,0.00047450815,0.0012894211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954414,0.00013129276,0.000115533876,0.00010460161,0.000037510996,0.00006692544],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030527804,0.00008880993,0.00012093575,0.000053228567,0.0023050408,0.00007683186,0.0005141682,0.000030084924,0.000015671885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059592905,0.00006301411,0.00005017218,0.0002454119,0.0001336978,0.00011401518,0.00008154034,0.0011067486,7.8143023e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046402664,0.0000515432,0.75836307,0.000028864359,0.00028891358,0.0000035280257,0.039283514,0.0016269688,0.000038246875,0.077749245,0.00014733933,0.12195476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042269267,0.013459144,0.3056182,0.00004272051,0.00013033208,0.0001569881,0.58232325,0.0007714609,0.00006174491,0.05075637,0.04157178,0.0008810537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021956759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083364657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54303974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010857483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095287326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292198337","doi":"10.1111/cars.12394","title":"Mine, yours, ours, or no one's? Homeownership arrangements among cohabiting and married couples","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Economic rent; Residence; Welfare economics; Inequality; Economics; Demographic economics; Sociology; Humanities; Labour economics; Political science; Market economy; Art","score_opus":0.06862169091884845,"score_gpt":0.28317388362330004,"score_spread":0.21455219270445158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292198337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96360075,0.021833863,0.0000059674308,0.008076577,0.0008556291,0.00094534666,0.00096139836,0.00006279113,0.0036576774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96653515,0.024211086,0.0004127973,0.0064519616,0.00035992605,0.00024722164,0.0003133273,0.00004549075,0.0014230245],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561113,0.0011864309,0.00059526955,0.0006032685,0.00016056407,0.0018433616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699956,0.00061968854,0.00045366248,0.00039501398,0.00031407355,0.0012180267],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043669534,0.0003226606,0.0008947291,0.00020673517,0.0016421449,0.00002355402,0.0008659002,0.00037561462,0.00079863187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003068883,0.00034312863,0.00020812635,0.00039811444,0.0023179192,0.00010739726,0.00012565777,0.0007447293,0.000008376157],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016217115,0.000035015073,0.91774046,0.0018336383,0.00023807157,0.00013606812,0.038788803,0.00001536463,0.00004192799,0.020602414,0.018690258,0.0018617393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008345929,0.0004883452,0.5929722,0.0011419571,0.00037873565,0.000019922742,0.3179632,0.00008084806,5.219932e-7,0.005010281,0.07999066,0.001118704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11782538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6617646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54393923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027822948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033515051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294266979","doi":"10.1080/02692171.2022.2117283","title":"Gender roles and safety of women at home in the COVID-19 era: evidence from 101 countries","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Applied Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Demographic economics; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Production (economics); Business; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Economic growth; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.029106749434844505,"score_gpt":0.29411951928929736,"score_spread":0.2650127698544529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294266979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97849274,0.010565488,0.00005060537,0.0032262704,0.00018951905,0.0003538842,0.00032727505,0.0000058546293,0.006788379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82428586,0.17046769,0.00014648422,0.004903336,0.000047928865,0.00007935097,0.00003146735,0.0000050789968,0.00003280139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891526,0.00009141885,0.00042398792,0.00018767781,0.00023824675,0.00014339328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988258,0.00064188143,0.00028574208,0.00015003358,0.00004013569,0.000056435536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021203698,0.00007944,0.0002510563,0.00004887777,0.00016002725,0.00001878566,0.00055529043,0.000028289132,0.00060710614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014811552,0.0000729531,0.000045096032,0.00008408591,0.00019313536,0.000085940934,0.00019218498,0.000096180374,0.0000043552527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032791446,0.00010413007,0.11710291,0.00084233447,0.0001829895,0.0000020581842,0.1117211,0.004162346,0.000027365653,0.7607102,0.0017323379,0.0030843148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009818414,0.000042823907,0.10907578,0.00024034784,0.000047863592,0.0000039329175,0.049533915,0.00040985623,0.0000051856914,0.08007352,0.75921524,0.00036970043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063167315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000908479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7574829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009984352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036810606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66473866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297103739","doi":"10.3386/w30492","title":"Labor Supply and Occupational Choice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Business; Labour economics; Economics","score_opus":0.3118105417213657,"score_gpt":0.5298495659284156,"score_spread":0.2180390242070499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297103739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061933305,0.0016386827,0.0000016949967,0.0015948683,0.0012684555,0.0006235152,0.0014664432,0.00002505966,0.931448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86223274,0.017785486,0.00054816215,0.00016593591,0.004461399,0.00031769002,0.00317035,0.00008074796,0.11123747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951851,0.00042053167,0.00048589974,0.00048948784,0.0029806332,0.00043838142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995195,0.0019573115,0.00023946291,0.0001907254,0.0022544772,0.00016302615],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007889003,0.00015172025,0.00032534794,0.0006803274,0.00074987893,0.000106464664,0.00055872067,0.0003278256,0.0033628086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027246724,0.0001776225,0.00009895068,0.00033012463,0.00062280294,0.0001818079,0.000243188,0.0007393653,0.000041849915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002572869,0.000078058496,0.2871917,0.000085188556,0.00012551126,0.0000025407815,0.0012074113,0.00014960759,0.0000092080445,0.56685597,0.14347674,0.00079235993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000332007,0.000060255097,0.22024433,0.000022720682,0.000013364674,0.0000037595778,0.0021076277,0.00010742189,0.0000013807726,0.107885234,0.668974,0.0002479226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027888596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008031187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8202105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025845473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017633067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297997379","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14636850.v2","title":"Review [untitled]","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Democracy; State (computer science); Political science; Art; Humanities; Theology; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.050755687908216336,"score_gpt":0.3456488744259415,"score_spread":0.29489318651772517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297997379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016064637,0.04774685,0.00026248113,0.002629894,0.0025786678,0.0005913053,0.00004638294,0.00020496735,0.944333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014820712,0.7726667,0.0025156972,0.021834133,0.0009400426,0.00023133431,0.00026665357,0.0000512041,0.18667355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985858,0.00022548654,0.00020660902,0.00031997406,0.00040982087,0.00025228356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992777,0.000040446448,0.0000993086,0.00041068497,0.00007892723,0.00009289301],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090357335,0.000130286,0.00025797353,0.000041872307,0.00034122015,0.0000571058,0.0006240305,0.00014329268,0.036054064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012046795,0.0001284643,0.00016530819,0.00019237629,0.00008354859,0.000026391577,0.0006621599,0.00048156537,0.0003120214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013453288,0.00009525044,0.018882016,0.0021744892,0.00006812504,0.000012767723,0.006959692,0.000058823065,0.0000010126791,0.20489876,0.763583,0.0032647324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027659466,0.0000043071173,0.00093850435,0.00019947134,0.00003829506,1.4915857e-7,0.0026545767,0.000016902319,5.890331e-8,0.0067618396,0.9891618,0.00019645414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057764566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018154337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75765944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017567066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006045091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9648271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298218240","doi":"10.17615/wqcf-mx40","title":"Cross-National Comparisons of Time Trends in Overweight Inequality by Socioeconomic Status Among Women Using Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys From 37 Developing Countries, 1989–2007","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UNC Libraries","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; National Institutes of Health; University of California, San Francisco; University of Toronto","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Overweight; Cross-sectional study; Inequality; Demography; Geography; Environmental health; Medicine; Obesity; Statistics; Sociology; Mathematics; Population","score_opus":0.052452680073613846,"score_gpt":0.3138880500084878,"score_spread":0.26143536993487393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298218240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99229145,0.0001642136,0.0019128727,0.00023006878,0.0003134309,0.00010504308,0.0024797036,0.00009834214,0.0024048865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99478626,0.000028929762,0.002419844,0.0004842394,0.00023728303,0.000007500279,0.0013664699,0.000024394096,0.0006450919],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972126,0.0004922972,0.0007634233,0.00044696176,0.00053237326,0.0005523777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864334,0.00048770302,0.00035882508,0.00012412707,0.00018828432,0.0001977233],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012533666,0.0002070121,0.00041415344,0.00011093834,0.0005339898,0.00053276675,0.00030510392,0.00026146084,0.0016829398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021761032,0.00023776828,0.00007173882,0.0005141605,0.0010537934,0.001360197,0.00012340574,0.00022403576,0.00001915571],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047976308,0.000039212555,0.9622643,0.000011358077,0.00006397146,0.0000011318873,0.016246073,0.000833429,0.000029270797,0.01922196,0.0012239335,0.000017373468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006222907,0.000017445016,0.98229367,0.0000069969183,0.000004124001,6.9662015e-8,0.0015666416,0.0035941121,0.000042760286,0.0065298006,0.005049201,0.00027289975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011771445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012542275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020029347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072441675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016321209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298331687","doi":"10.46692/9781847425256.012","title":"Gender inequality in poverty in affluent nations: the role of single motherhood and the state","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Inequality; Gender inequality; State (computer science); Single mothers; Sociology; Political science; Development economics; Demographic economics; Gender studies; Economics; Economic growth; Psychology; Mathematics; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.022494458327270078,"score_gpt":0.2753494019806463,"score_spread":0.2528549436533762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298331687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011542123,0.0020643321,0.00018897816,0.00041146064,0.00010566598,0.00061112776,0.000040628845,0.000028221299,0.98500746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7459112,0.006978467,0.00028569216,0.0012839101,0.00012087847,0.000047076166,0.0000080246855,0.00011306822,0.2452517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858457,0.0004702322,0.00024626122,0.0001789762,0.00030595544,0.000213989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993515,0.00023447794,0.0001400948,0.00021503108,0.000031418826,0.00002747122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010559639,0.00012281281,0.00021728693,0.00014062357,0.00007460037,0.000035008343,0.0002583852,0.00014503849,0.00042986748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013754131,0.00006800688,0.00004004227,0.00044585485,0.00031471293,0.000035741723,0.000047750153,0.00014292823,0.0000035341488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000637422,0.00094618293,0.31538114,0.00009734197,0.00018525355,0.0000047907756,0.24372259,0.00029346073,0.00003327418,0.4168086,0.012175565,0.010288059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004043991,0.000041851898,0.080016226,0.00014606935,0.000051015617,0.0000011224679,0.32085788,0.0011825266,0.000006244876,0.25410926,0.3388188,0.000725007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0989841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3735552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73975575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007687099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012728812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90701586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298358275","doi":"10.2307/25149537","title":"Public Pensions: Gender and Civic Service in the States, 1850-1937","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public service; Service (business); Business; Public administration; Political science; Demographic economics; Gender studies; Sociology; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.04174751785137953,"score_gpt":0.2639368407228002,"score_spread":0.22218932287142068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298358275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805856,0.0013503634,0.00011679606,0.0074028764,0.0001829737,0.00027257844,0.000023584402,0.00006864376,0.00999663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909758,0.0014854037,0.00023185079,0.0065315664,0.000099822166,0.00001807158,0.000015827749,0.000016127455,0.00062552054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983186,0.00026853464,0.00020400954,0.00028603352,0.00040304833,0.0005197857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930084,0.00010485019,0.000055449204,0.00026319773,0.00013867028,0.00013700993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097444176,0.00014270029,0.00015540961,0.00007994447,0.0005724782,0.00024575848,0.00040199218,0.00012700954,0.00005107971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007142596,0.0001157686,0.000032034815,0.0008321181,0.00019643616,0.00027956293,0.000043533495,0.00025031433,0.00005590767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011363773,0.000366496,0.06495747,0.0000663491,0.000034522338,0.000051143328,0.4155435,0.0002969779,0.00013329452,0.5157617,0.0007684512,0.0020087885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095942745,0.000024970028,0.72210515,0.00001287239,0.000010729029,0.0000065991235,0.20096387,0.000056626577,0.0000021481274,0.037564907,0.038045306,0.00024738346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024247842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12450458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6571477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006975459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005071711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9822498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300131663","doi":"","title":"Do Higher Childcare Subsidies Improve Parental Well-being? Evidence from Québec's Family Policies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Business; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.030360070124020238,"score_gpt":0.2979605197128497,"score_spread":0.26760044958882945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300131663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83434016,0.018765563,0.00018763944,0.0022894852,0.0079909405,0.00073764776,0.00024218779,0.00050147437,0.13494489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97534674,0.009342775,0.0006638941,0.0010804227,0.0032311657,0.000077262564,0.000098643344,0.00006711332,0.010091975],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958986,0.00034090562,0.00058511156,0.0009859148,0.0010692216,0.0011202341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975236,0.00041340286,0.00034707505,0.00096643664,0.00030758072,0.00044190435],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005547692,0.0006583505,0.00071109086,0.00014158823,0.0008033316,0.0005904813,0.001484846,0.00088862446,0.0009364252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012838875,0.000596386,0.00040536546,0.00022900717,0.00070679997,0.00044756976,0.0009841453,0.0008978461,0.00037574515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021574933,0.00012117989,0.8090455,0.00008409003,0.00024383568,0.0000056480994,0.16569008,0.00003311842,0.00035565364,0.01707384,0.006214224,0.0011112563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022869417,0.000031423693,0.87936395,0.0003438606,0.00024447718,3.146229e-7,0.08090321,0.00002998955,0.000061549894,0.014833656,0.022677103,0.0012817708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7391814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2415626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4976188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062076707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013317927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302768472","doi":"","title":"Not for the Profit, but for the Training? Gender Differences in Training in the For-Profit and Non-Profit Sectors","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Profit (economics); Training (meteorology); For profit; Business; Gross profit; Marketing; Economics; Microeconomics; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.1817160381842256,"score_gpt":0.38179125910366213,"score_spread":0.20007522091943652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302768472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9770836,0.00032641258,0.0002216515,0.0038526023,0.0010207229,0.008701238,0.0003815494,0.000019748062,0.00839243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98589146,0.0056344587,0.0005126303,0.00023620288,0.0006888815,0.005890536,0.000029442032,0.000058661844,0.0010576978],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99603486,0.0004429082,0.00067619135,0.0009910599,0.00041739893,0.0014375848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989985,0.008440393,0.00032736285,0.00095774163,0.00017115976,0.00011832554],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013030269,0.0003856425,0.0006609362,0.00026722028,0.0018495006,0.0007515754,0.0025396273,0.0006004445,0.0000065556746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023083135,0.0002455957,0.0002679796,0.00013887866,0.0013709149,0.0001500751,0.00042405288,0.0014610874,4.2465896e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004158731,0.000023721488,0.4209442,0.0004890123,0.00026287758,0.000004693844,0.39435792,0.0013300759,0.00003603355,0.02137999,0.000076175005,0.1606794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016310047,0.0001304291,0.42978415,0.0001555392,0.00004128282,0.0000016364976,0.4842023,0.054495398,0.000006862435,0.026780415,0.0021930567,0.00057791464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018326028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034160595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16010149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044941992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020873237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302769027","doi":"","title":"Are Lone Mothers Responsive to Policy Changes? Evidence from a Workfare Reform in a Generous Welfare State","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workfare; Welfare reform; Welfare; Economics; State (computer science); Welfare state; Labour economics; Political science; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.06295010452925016,"score_gpt":0.3655136107460853,"score_spread":0.30256350621683514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302769027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95828557,0.00068542286,0.00000640858,0.020201327,0.0003974502,0.0018175321,0.0004666821,0.00008062032,0.018058985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433931,0.048246637,0.0012775607,0.0017476069,0.00083134294,0.00044188468,0.000060174985,0.00011431174,0.0038873903],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370956,0.0013073897,0.0007524841,0.0015976955,0.000766552,0.0018663179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658287,0.0005462251,0.0004302243,0.0014346841,0.00036508343,0.00064094487],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037044946,0.00049829704,0.0008834317,0.002059251,0.00047605982,0.00038855235,0.0018570988,0.00073810405,0.00006276326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028828573,0.0005663772,0.00016869526,0.0012859412,0.00045465652,0.00019784122,0.0011951866,0.0020583624,0.000025756492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021562895,0.00056609453,0.11042722,0.0002951216,0.0002804427,0.0010462356,0.21194677,0.077961065,0.00018486442,0.0023806412,0.00020935854,0.59254587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013475397,0.00035080442,0.7225044,0.0034815336,0.000020503161,0.0000035509554,0.21314484,0.002599561,0.000025901965,0.012924104,0.041425213,0.0021720377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056983285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4022978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6120772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011751494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002450421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306937158","doi":"10.1111/caje.12628","title":"Unbundling female empowerment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Empowerment; Unbundling; Norm (philosophy); Poverty; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Economic growth; Business; Economics; Industrial organization","score_opus":0.10903918546047751,"score_gpt":0.21499991190116013,"score_spread":0.10596072644068262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306937158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831136,0.00031014753,0.00004150583,0.002430164,0.004307629,0.00022118092,0.00018792068,0.000008917173,0.009378967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952389,0.00015560116,0.0002985084,0.0012242795,0.0008016331,0.000017071534,0.000013333893,0.000040515217,0.0022101759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784094,0.00019831913,0.0006927872,0.00029126083,0.000007463822,0.00096920354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681354,0.000115862545,0.00052613986,0.00028994586,0.00017040987,0.002084096],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017491889,0.00019853555,0.00042380288,0.0006206562,0.0013945684,0.00016606729,0.0008801384,0.000110345194,0.0012817847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015498766,0.00027704277,0.00023324446,0.00022604078,0.00022697083,0.00031967132,0.00004150967,0.00050481345,0.000014085139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003202041,0.000027879158,0.07746332,0.000014246929,0.00014962669,0.00030930838,0.04478218,0.031614196,0.0000071842064,0.8423537,0.0016338801,0.0016124608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010525365,0.00055399904,0.0060347742,0.000034634606,0.00007445854,0.0003117588,0.11458505,0.0011414536,0.000007562953,0.16263407,0.7126868,0.00088291056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39532453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9912967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7110529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006211707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008492734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307128056","doi":"10.1007/s00148-022-00927-9","title":"2023 Kuznets Prize awarded to Garima Rastogi and Anisha Sharma","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Peking University; University of Toronto; University of Texas Rio Grande Valley; Reed College; University of Oklahoma; Sapienza Università di Roma; Jinan University; Baylor University; National University of Singapore; Università Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emila; Yale University","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Social policy; Human capital; Sociology; Economic growth; Socioeconomic status; Economics; Political science; Population","score_opus":0.026939728710973193,"score_gpt":0.2858941914923507,"score_spread":0.25895446278137746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307128056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945298,0.00008577333,0.00028237017,0.0017511509,0.0012179993,0.0001299867,0.000028038818,0.000008216276,0.0019667095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962161,0.00021132112,0.0015929503,0.0006655641,0.00035701747,0.0000025709555,0.000008417348,0.0000113751585,0.00093469146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902993,0.000108100154,0.00040963548,0.000118435964,0.00015481538,0.00017907473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926627,0.000048771006,0.0003563372,0.00007789387,0.00007812854,0.0001725832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009004536,0.00007546511,0.00018286704,0.00013827503,0.0004606257,0.00009216129,0.00018767081,0.000042778578,0.00024739746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000088392924,0.00008718932,0.00006413056,0.00012487234,0.000025527268,0.00025738418,0.00007375471,0.00016598741,0.0000079028805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017742027,0.00020750397,0.83549684,0.000016875325,0.00012226289,0.000016825998,0.026592106,0.08000289,0.00022514326,0.0331961,0.010031663,0.013914375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012101039,0.00031745216,0.77190906,0.000010018805,0.000058613576,0.00004240006,0.02882426,0.0055235615,0.0000038345165,0.012011329,0.17971444,0.00037492532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045264332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062225305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16968277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034330352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013806547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35554773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310399239","doi":"10.1257/aeri.20210485","title":"Partisan Fertility and Presidential Elections","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review Insights","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Surprise; Economics; Politics; Presidential system; Democracy; Demographic economics; General election; Total fertility rate; Presidential election; Power (physics); Political economy; Development economics; Political science; Sociology; Family planning; Demography; Population; Law","score_opus":0.02000459938045719,"score_gpt":0.2924093059582638,"score_spread":0.27240470657780663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310399239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95883155,0.01870359,0.00004248819,0.0009933629,0.00042686024,0.00042952166,0.000017368735,0.00006314705,0.020492086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623809,0.035426274,0.000060964063,0.0013638975,0.00007511038,0.00010822813,0.000008959722,0.000009490972,0.00056617823],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867755,0.0004245323,0.00026881884,0.00029052957,0.0001079853,0.00023059486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994068,0.00006309204,0.00016973611,0.0002186158,0.000017589797,0.0001241589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033875325,0.00009604863,0.00027796486,0.00004003533,0.0009277256,0.000047846363,0.0001992356,0.000013441792,0.0005000471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034976387,0.000102388076,0.0000733252,0.00019436606,0.00038899807,0.00014001079,0.00009053932,0.00012906564,0.000039452472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071429626,0.0005415253,0.5191202,0.0005795037,0.000482382,0.000026591117,0.04429989,0.00038673962,0.00014199926,0.19328366,0.059707437,0.18135862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010827749,0.000080670005,0.21248788,0.000020933812,0.00005732786,0.0000027141073,0.0035588676,0.0001364106,0.0000015671714,0.002071748,0.78124535,0.00022828086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061587067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003626871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7215379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022954776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024114487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9310163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312638833","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4239601","title":"Expansions in Paid Parental Leave and Mothers’ Economic Progress","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parental leave; Norwegian; Childbirth; Quarter (Canadian coin); Differential (mechanical device); Government (linguistics); Demographic economics; Ranking (information retrieval); Gender pay gap; Labour economics; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Wage; Pregnancy; Geography","score_opus":0.010723612554406648,"score_gpt":0.2634875513825022,"score_spread":0.25276393882809556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312638833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944493,0.0025608428,0.00006143604,0.0010007755,0.00032124738,0.00013178434,0.0000075000744,0.000018495399,0.0014485867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954414,0.0034433962,0.000025347379,0.00008517204,0.00015341426,0.000015499952,0.0000027389494,0.00001302326,0.000820008],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788386,0.00024326754,0.00017255732,0.00016246758,0.00019427725,0.0013436028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997202,0.000029537128,0.00008157573,0.000070980255,0.000012096176,0.00008556904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015789577,0.00008620159,0.00011728719,0.00010225523,0.0008630271,0.000059233433,0.0002244887,0.00003925317,0.00008884008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000112557545,0.00009071524,0.00004838918,0.00012377229,0.00012862812,0.00013435086,0.000059289192,0.001022231,0.0000050331537],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003466573,0.00012908009,0.6705718,0.000002081669,0.000060172235,0.000011614874,0.039976608,0.00035529147,0.00002705923,0.27470034,0.00012861306,0.0140026575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011885625,0.00037372313,0.052660685,0.0000073175675,0.000020687019,0.00014850317,0.7602742,0.0007042,0.0000013914248,0.17609425,0.008198919,0.00032756498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010512619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026556036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7202976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017980098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023178647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99120677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312924045","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4297424","title":"Anticipated Gender Discrimination and Grade Disclosure","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Grading (engineering); Incentive; Masking (illustration); Statistical discrimination; Transparency (behavior); Gender discrimination; Gender gap; Psychology; Gender bias; Accounting; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.024681704161298786,"score_gpt":0.28972170052987867,"score_spread":0.2650399963685799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312924045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99115825,0.0020659084,0.0021235205,0.0016545214,0.00040739705,0.00011465771,0.0000072858056,0.00003517114,0.0024333058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935698,0.004140192,0.000030438303,0.00011771492,0.00019254428,0.0000068112745,0.000009516632,0.000014021707,0.001918999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743485,0.00034595313,0.0001612206,0.00016003686,0.00047934038,0.0014186008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996478,0.000030349865,0.000098540695,0.000076128716,0.00005274693,0.00009442696],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020111885,0.00009379383,0.00010678158,0.0000948313,0.001840969,0.00008199334,0.00021389009,0.000043221367,0.000053234588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044431647,0.00009002498,0.000053605123,0.00028300457,0.00009902522,0.00017924541,0.000057325222,0.0011354754,0.0000021137687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015370797,0.00011539083,0.096861884,0.0000046378273,0.00008695205,0.000006703694,0.028715355,0.000113833725,0.00020306271,0.86995363,0.00015356699,0.0037696313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006863494,0.00022580872,0.096672066,0.0000030746892,0.00008536751,0.00012580429,0.32530904,0.00043803247,0.0000021140188,0.5700913,0.006078834,0.00028222418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046297084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003489828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29986233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007757752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001369838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313033276","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4283321","title":"Labor-Leisure Choices in the Long Run: Is YOLO Sustainable?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Economics; Business; Natural resource economics","score_opus":0.008174293030389072,"score_gpt":0.26408504253096327,"score_spread":0.2559107495005742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313033276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97235394,0.0068730544,0.00017151976,0.008945417,0.00035422223,0.0002727774,0.0000066433063,0.000029846386,0.010992611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97966486,0.004919888,0.000007729278,0.0010308706,0.00041967048,0.000021801758,0.000003354285,0.00001586786,0.013915971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950851,0.00077262096,0.00024425754,0.00020744903,0.0008183076,0.0028722726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936277,0.00010886487,0.00014813986,0.00018359438,0.00012533393,0.000071303315],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067752195,0.0001355297,0.00016231879,0.00014867709,0.0023720472,0.00019588954,0.0010274448,0.000074437914,0.00019906055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008675543,0.00011039238,0.00010319346,0.0010810834,0.00011291647,0.00027373323,0.00008938795,0.00272854,0.0000086861355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021882226,0.000116216506,0.2964714,0.000005778827,0.000052770545,0.000052467538,0.04059229,0.00019617857,0.0000049124737,0.6603263,0.0006733646,0.0014864781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004906951,0.00018329856,0.062649116,0.0000031555633,0.000024977075,0.00008254559,0.649366,0.000044785847,6.055144e-7,0.1964189,0.09053926,0.00019663594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038118213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028231185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60877377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018080916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050712805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313353061","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-01775-9_14","title":"Margaret Gilpin Reid (1896–1991)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Poverty; Sociology; Positive economics; Population; Work (physics); Economics; Economic history; Economic growth; Demography; Engineering","score_opus":0.029784759114535597,"score_gpt":0.2647937911317072,"score_spread":0.2350090320171716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313353061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000060085225,0.00050767785,0.000057073332,0.0010560694,0.0018124594,0.0003503604,0.00015533967,0.00024726524,0.99575365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018816675,0.003257026,0.00034624644,0.0014551237,0.0006555997,0.00001545067,0.00025210693,0.00007155644,0.99206525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976604,0.00007376428,0.0003308265,0.00053257344,0.00092177716,0.00048066853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894893,0.00010108765,0.00016392578,0.00046477962,0.00011334415,0.0002079556],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000561095,0.0003169212,0.00037537783,0.00014880176,0.00079573644,0.00009163725,0.0006731137,0.00047953668,0.034877747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000432779,0.00033004492,0.00023849167,0.000083038445,0.00028285343,0.00010774314,0.00022367874,0.00060826214,0.00050361827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003936606,0.000010306304,0.00014006901,0.000010560287,0.000041415373,0.000026463398,0.0022063453,0.0000027911997,0.0000010415977,0.95157903,0.044802994,0.0011750481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001049998,0.00003629901,0.00017641184,0.000011723549,0.00003729427,0.0000012643786,0.0026544842,0.000008102567,1.0539075e-7,0.055035464,0.94151527,0.00041855627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003008555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006502989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8967123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000368049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039111203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317369542","doi":"10.3138/9781487552305-008","title":"6 Generational Conflict: Intimacy, Money, and “Miniskirt” Feminism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.030791099205268103,"score_gpt":0.23855153451080358,"score_spread":0.20776043530553548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317369542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028559388,0.0015292832,0.00012833472,0.000034636938,0.00029877346,0.00027346477,0.00032044764,0.000046343965,0.9970831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034800032,0.003962379,0.0008570492,0.00007265183,0.0001533049,5.4172074e-7,0.000065484055,0.000021764132,0.99138683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987823,0.00005758978,0.00014921665,0.0003408825,0.0004716304,0.00019837491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920887,0.0000706114,0.00021206171,0.0002278064,0.00013149461,0.00014915482],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018419272,0.00019460039,0.00029390972,0.000026662929,0.0006677454,0.00003219381,0.00041033293,0.00028140366,0.0013066371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000066265793,0.0002673092,0.00011640694,0.0000011575187,0.00060968904,0.00012176476,0.00033413945,0.00019963447,0.0000020703812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002678825,0.000013028019,0.000041100495,0.00002277779,0.000120516066,0.000021441456,0.058729976,0.000010748819,0.00001681841,0.9353133,0.0038314234,0.0018521234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032012744,0.00004748092,0.00014739743,0.000014991376,0.000107755164,0.0000010793569,0.0024337159,0.000054785523,0.00000164769,0.001283805,0.995322,0.0002652505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1303693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038275067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99149054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026995444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028862106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318698920","doi":"10.1038/s41562-023-01523-x","title":"Author Correction: Within-job gender pay inequality in 15 countries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Nature Human Behaviour","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS","keywords":"Inequality; Psychology; Demographic economics; Gender inequality; Sociology; Labour economics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04587240705349428,"score_gpt":0.3548395890034942,"score_spread":0.30896718194999995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318698920","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20288463,0.004130123,0.0000586636,0.0024699492,0.6378394,0.002518354,0.0012743562,0.0022125556,0.146612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23819256,0.0003145184,0.00004566709,0.00065580854,0.0055692634,0.00008468466,0.001141925,0.00014674001,0.75384885],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994654,0.00066792,0.00084227615,0.0010389664,0.0018294484,0.0009673816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977486,0.00014060165,0.0005151053,0.00071272545,0.0006069897,0.00027597454],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025577107,0.00062531966,0.0008231266,0.00055114896,0.0012982904,0.0003907637,0.0009919736,0.005138961,0.00039349616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047721513,0.0005696926,0.00027187055,0.0012031232,0.00047429855,0.0002476799,0.00017759389,0.007709734,0.0001466164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008852128,0.000076761826,0.1967609,0.00006828099,0.000030413596,0.000098385826,0.02407473,0.000007823173,0.0000013432741,0.007979977,0.7708646,0.00002792356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035169226,0.000045410827,0.6813325,0.00016968907,0.00014509843,0.0000032433609,0.018342137,0.000018760285,8.2043414e-7,0.0030657006,0.29563433,0.0008905807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008764976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15063764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6322701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009824932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016955754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318992413","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4344410","title":"Does Co-Residence with Parents-in-Law Reduce Women's Employment in India?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Demographic economics; Political science; Law; Labour economics; Economics","score_opus":0.012219072422715294,"score_gpt":0.29025213486249596,"score_spread":0.27803306243978065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318992413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99568903,0.00019595104,0.00006132137,0.0008826537,0.00029861057,0.00019142215,0.0000034092386,0.000051151554,0.0026264174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912449,0.0059631825,0.000015786993,0.0001639262,0.0001835093,0.000029438794,0.0000033292831,0.000019509363,0.0023764344],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538285,0.00025389154,0.0002966094,0.00026825647,0.0006392841,0.0031591146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944645,0.00008046547,0.00011983695,0.00014283077,0.000057700316,0.00015271883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003163598,0.00015294485,0.00020844147,0.00024153943,0.00038773622,0.00011180686,0.00043677384,0.000099226454,0.000024287896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005986203,0.00010654278,0.000039192273,0.0009768698,0.00022569296,0.0002873725,0.000030125975,0.0012364283,0.00004209023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009565257,0.00014335461,0.6538187,0.000007818571,0.000058286925,0.000099515404,0.038001057,0.00027078172,0.0001077497,0.30508837,0.00005734976,0.0022512984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016011246,0.0004188911,0.31023884,0.000109805136,0.0000117386135,0.000023152827,0.3840013,0.00003819669,0.000024305213,0.3008807,0.0021893303,0.00046259473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023922876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0662345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34600025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034906068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9508043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319997731","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4326170","title":"Gender Specific Distortions, Entrepreneurship and Misallocation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Business; Economics; Labour economics; Finance","score_opus":0.0259373471685616,"score_gpt":0.27612952027021276,"score_spread":0.25019217310165115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319997731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.984751,0.004555091,0.003584274,0.0016754551,0.0006570465,0.00011717722,0.0000025731258,0.00012049332,0.0045369007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496166,0.04565609,0.000028474682,0.00005105226,0.00045819872,0.0000031899917,0.000008891918,0.000012651772,0.004164835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781513,0.00015485451,0.0001658352,0.0001759294,0.00031541495,0.0013728387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957603,0.000054452423,0.000074505326,0.000104977575,0.000073821124,0.0001162135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017059244,0.00008635994,0.00008746785,0.000117198906,0.00070324756,0.00010173992,0.00016629808,0.00007383174,0.000026021433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007121214,0.00008652738,0.00005073532,0.00039365413,0.00010228878,0.00015915916,0.000018800436,0.0005699677,0.00007084254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010540496,0.00003734092,0.16288991,0.000004368612,0.000054849264,0.000004263311,0.011097493,0.000049802027,0.00017637614,0.80866563,0.00090371695,0.016105698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045242318,0.00006260545,0.24757867,0.000007793207,0.00003425596,0.000047384932,0.09010607,0.00010623638,0.000003600462,0.6153128,0.046012007,0.0002761523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014285874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022529422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19335285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056973397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012215623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5408883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320013873","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4331137","title":"Does Co-Residence with Parents-In-Law Reduce Women's Employment In India?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Demographic economics; Instrumental variable; Panel data; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.012219072422715294,"score_gpt":0.29025213486249596,"score_spread":0.27803306243978065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320013873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99568903,0.00019595104,0.00006132137,0.0008826537,0.00029861057,0.00019142215,0.0000034092386,0.000051151554,0.0026264174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912449,0.0059631825,0.000015786993,0.0001639262,0.0001835093,0.000029438794,0.0000033292831,0.000019509363,0.0023764344],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538285,0.00025389154,0.0002966094,0.00026825647,0.0006392841,0.0031591146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944645,0.00008046547,0.00011983695,0.00014283077,0.000057700316,0.00015271883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003163598,0.00015294485,0.00020844147,0.00024153943,0.00038773622,0.00011180686,0.00043677384,0.000099226454,0.000024287896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005986203,0.00010654278,0.000039192273,0.0009768698,0.00022569296,0.0002873725,0.000030125975,0.0012364283,0.00004209023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009565257,0.00014335461,0.6538187,0.000007818571,0.000058286925,0.000099515404,0.038001057,0.00027078172,0.0001077497,0.30508837,0.00005734976,0.0022512984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016011246,0.0004188911,0.31023884,0.000109805136,0.0000117386135,0.000023152827,0.3840013,0.00003819669,0.000024305213,0.3008807,0.0021893303,0.00046259473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023922876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0662345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34600025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034906068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9508043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320494785","doi":"10.1080/00036846.2023.2174938","title":"Do educational inequalities between marital partners influence the empowerment of educated women in ECOWAS?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Empowerment; Endogeneity; Spouse; Marital status; Inequality; Women's empowerment; Demographic economics; Economics; Power (physics); Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.030117391934471934,"score_gpt":0.308085200025778,"score_spread":0.27796780809130606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320494785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731579,0.000010922784,9.528516e-7,0.001123039,0.00023009005,0.00023763753,0.000048217564,0.000025036108,0.025166245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985418,0.0002039678,0.00003204715,0.00019117638,0.00015643174,0.000121001875,0.000053355452,0.000011357215,0.0006888785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988572,0.000047994236,0.00035430046,0.0002041198,0.00010063268,0.000435753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919474,0.00035195783,0.00012874613,0.00019921552,0.000031562096,0.00009377972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011168668,0.00010159655,0.00018990517,0.000110619534,0.00016839661,0.00006467649,0.00036014876,0.00008613724,0.00007069044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057286095,0.000099364675,0.000033241035,0.0003416515,0.00027700927,0.000108432745,0.00007952527,0.000108450586,0.000065078886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007955718,0.000041565894,0.6624982,0.000013778882,0.000033497225,9.3697714e-8,0.102158606,0.0024365627,0.000008547226,0.2317476,0.00044524702,0.0006083514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015955963,0.000008491817,0.7838602,0.000003703418,0.000003999497,5.1470863e-8,0.14151812,0.000022483488,0.0000057237007,0.070825554,0.0034638566,0.00012825655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009817209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007972758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16092204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036302395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000713704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40519738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321513703","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2022.70.supp.milligan","title":"All in the Family: Assessing Need in the Fiscal Unit","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Unit (ring theory); Fiscal system; Economics; Fiscal year; Standard of living; Measuring poverty; Demographic economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Economic policy; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.05272382642777265,"score_gpt":0.2703453632176448,"score_spread":0.21762153678987214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321513703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8750223,0.0004926979,0.000027143635,0.09396075,0.0012843766,0.0004076835,0.00016736715,0.0000114582535,0.028626224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856316,0.00011160345,0.000057525667,0.011003454,0.0005684649,0.000060522376,0.000036729718,0.00002925126,0.0025008726],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523616,0.0018826899,0.00048182948,0.00030530756,0.00045018393,0.0016438218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980965,0.00038785514,0.0001889442,0.000425004,0.000082934,0.0008187279],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054797227,0.0002226668,0.00027538347,0.0006524951,0.0023095498,0.00051391934,0.001960846,0.00015003399,0.0002576677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003909525,0.00018510089,0.00012807437,0.002022788,0.00022218676,0.00029508458,0.000048695343,0.0019550389,0.0000075442404],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000130308845,0.00014219726,0.36275122,0.000023796802,0.000057662077,0.0062314062,0.45316106,0.0038335517,0.00003883798,0.020466313,0.14773741,0.0055434993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031011456,0.00003387888,0.24806069,0.00001801221,0.00001831944,0.00021514448,0.3262982,0.00041373275,6.190378e-8,0.0030261665,0.42137843,0.00022724293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78576773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99593204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27364102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022273886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002093473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323317988","doi":"10.1017/s1474746422000720","title":"The Mixed Impact of Care Work on the Finances of Low-income Canadians: Insights from the Canadian Financial Diaries Research Project","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; Canadian Mennonite University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Care work; Low income; Economic growth; Child care; Income Support; Paid work; Business; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Socioeconomics; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.05039512627703179,"score_gpt":0.35890919171608093,"score_spread":0.30851406543904913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323317988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857003,0.00060221076,2.5953085e-7,0.007907934,0.00025092176,0.00043143626,0.0005411657,0.0000148262,0.004550921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968221,0.001216831,0.0000033618533,0.0003102392,0.0011463678,0.000032877786,0.000015542264,0.0000107051155,0.00044195712],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977426,0.0006711031,0.00019870148,0.00017949204,0.000550469,0.00065764796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976481,0.001657984,0.000094940355,0.00020830876,0.00028398325,0.0001066762],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011508132,0.00012710462,0.00020042853,0.000064129395,0.0071474332,0.0001481864,0.00056697894,0.0002525491,0.0000031863185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011015137,0.00006849902,0.0002625348,0.0021375269,0.0028051196,0.000058643996,0.00006537825,0.00042586832,0.0000027745236],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001627151,0.0000076249785,0.019627709,0.000013005454,0.000071472576,8.9691736e-7,0.73959786,0.000008977759,0.0000036162355,0.20689246,0.032615565,0.0011445138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011083326,0.000041372397,0.70562446,0.000029318408,0.000008740517,1.6337319e-8,0.26384327,0.000011052197,0.0000027619574,0.021306338,0.00892966,0.0000922084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9710322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9801199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6859967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005141784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009902514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323666330","doi":"10.1080/17516234.2023.2182157","title":"The impact of Vietnam’s 2013 extension of paid maternity leave on women’s labour force participation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Asian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; McGill University","funders":"FHI 360; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Maternity leave; Vietnamese; Regression discontinuity design; Demographic economics; Formal education; Labour economics; Percentage point; Economics; Medicine; Psychology","score_opus":0.034824919744996505,"score_gpt":0.3520587817209764,"score_spread":0.31723386197597986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323666330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879549,0.000032967433,0.000030642077,0.008362529,0.00025175742,0.00010514114,0.000031388285,0.000016381531,0.0032142967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975613,0.0007093635,0.000018986317,0.00010157879,0.00041090886,0.0000037523396,0.0000014914706,0.000012370786,0.0011802787],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978738,0.0003428987,0.000550452,0.00009213825,0.0006223253,0.0005184227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980083,0.0001792716,0.0007470223,0.00021669272,0.00058305747,0.00026563212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024320316,0.00011038969,0.00026791194,0.00037337458,0.00029378393,0.0000918618,0.0003789546,0.00010098632,0.000039363713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015765938,0.000071533934,0.00019831842,0.000938404,0.00019425333,0.00033632395,0.00004341246,0.0001894314,0.000016977465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007275951,0.0013732737,0.34479323,0.00017663246,0.0009741092,0.000040089075,0.29042804,0.0025736857,0.0063261306,0.19843173,0.07093418,0.0832213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043442182,0.00054119603,0.96143836,0.00003486468,0.000010350168,0.0000037725808,0.023987683,0.00027977856,0.000043918888,0.010231642,0.002897945,0.00009607747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021009974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033402338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6166451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040821094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010619371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31760934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360998863","doi":"10.4324/9781003269564","title":"Children, the Law and the Welfare Principle","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.015931063668510773,"score_gpt":0.2646068532748829,"score_spread":0.24867578960637216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360998863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025998405,0.00042142815,0.0000135977325,0.008337525,0.00061970006,0.0006377129,0.000052121155,0.00015308833,0.9895048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007203171,0.001520273,0.000015326534,0.002116248,0.00086177205,0.00002180404,0.000039061433,0.000030106174,0.98819226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987201,0.00015615353,0.00016098686,0.00024777214,0.00043039382,0.0002846044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918383,0.0002464156,0.000083540755,0.00035560614,0.00006642033,0.00006417167],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009329759,0.00016596924,0.00020324848,0.000021431337,0.0017643188,0.00019438616,0.0005805995,0.0002511699,0.000109442626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056744077,0.000081007965,0.000106853244,0.00010675937,0.0014180458,0.000040342016,0.00019683877,0.00034301504,0.00010122977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022251286,0.0000026298103,0.0002416162,0.000004110431,0.00004272033,7.311175e-7,0.0052148593,0.0000014419808,8.945057e-9,0.9784657,0.01590025,0.00012374732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025620367,0.0000063405414,0.0061883754,0.000010214976,0.000057126974,9.281939e-7,0.0055410536,0.000017937176,1.9922231e-8,0.06575937,0.9219961,0.00016628827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004086609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03307054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9127063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006182461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002480381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362504803","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_4076-2","title":"Teen Motherhood in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.01801319722807646,"score_gpt":0.2290612748833438,"score_spread":0.21104807765526734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362504803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043997474,0.00016676307,0.0000064742585,0.0004922751,0.0006251061,0.00018625727,0.0000728827,0.000027808144,0.99798244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026235936,0.0006205606,0.000056393837,0.0010617229,0.0001384165,0.0000071145373,0.00002375237,0.00003111999,0.971825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874645,0.000030023564,0.00018244945,0.0002362021,0.0005291908,0.00027565405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995796,0.00005399879,0.00006420864,0.00018126942,0.000028306993,0.00009260546],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001892151,0.0001453225,0.00020386848,0.000069657166,0.00017686418,0.000018805176,0.00034237886,0.0001262602,0.013792114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011647422,0.00015375087,0.00004844019,0.00004900814,0.000048980084,0.000036601727,0.0000633943,0.00030768808,0.000023626073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012635418,0.000004937561,0.005189592,0.000005207424,0.000018159535,0.00003721974,0.0024127606,0.000024486797,1.473012e-7,0.9827361,0.008028446,0.0015416592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008232737,0.00000706784,0.0016940458,0.0000053958406,0.0000074481463,2.418129e-7,0.0076824673,0.000015968857,2.7323344e-8,0.01689186,0.97337943,0.0002337217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9658443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015963573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00492513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9871094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366389447","doi":"10.4324/9781003193500-2","title":"Diversity in Canadian families","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Genealogy; Geography; Sociology; History; Anthropology","score_opus":0.04471455467882576,"score_gpt":0.25405389519941124,"score_spread":0.20933934052058548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366389447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002051608,0.000039235594,0.0000027754515,0.00038970713,0.0007921822,0.00015340089,0.00007606813,0.000091068025,0.99640393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05476264,0.0016481158,0.000020411808,0.0003937411,0.00012768195,0.0000010955994,0.00002479368,0.000018522149,0.943003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988732,0.000017339913,0.00011989488,0.00023787738,0.00030811055,0.0004436072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999421,0.000050344046,0.000032002492,0.00014854531,0.0000612721,0.00028683068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032333712,0.0001396991,0.00018301445,0.00033678653,0.00092214375,0.000027209766,0.00033646874,0.00040953976,0.0005018356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034255492,0.00015443034,0.00007129858,0.00008608479,0.0001852205,0.000054485645,0.00022511311,0.00022564895,0.00052345044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.5318156e-7,0.0000016282854,0.043146245,0.00000525794,0.000012573495,0.000047206096,0.015243087,0.000003365701,2.6770154e-8,0.93724334,0.003902806,0.00039389243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011388651,0.0000104220935,0.05819392,0.00003367415,0.000020191224,1.396064e-7,0.01708878,0.000020006799,1.972126e-8,0.10666849,0.8173873,0.0004631905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9739587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99945444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83057487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005477965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009980621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70924777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366493850","doi":"10.46692/9781447332596.013","title":"Appendix: list of women reformers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appendix; Computer science; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.014640912399233905,"score_gpt":0.277398063941642,"score_spread":0.2627571515424081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366493850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000985238,0.00006317648,0.00009732388,0.00004138144,0.00076948584,0.00015408795,0.000029225119,0.00011693718,0.9977431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020146193,0.0005137598,0.0007073022,0.00012521676,0.0005349281,0.00000608894,0.000022270895,0.000105366875,0.9959704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988878,0.000049285703,0.0001420241,0.00018916662,0.00032016108,0.0004116123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942917,0.000013941844,0.00014510727,0.00023047457,0.00004380429,0.0001375097],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037842328,0.00012664766,0.00024260579,0.00012472087,0.00008283954,0.000018946414,0.00035295973,0.0003209826,0.039185964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032889122,0.00010586881,0.000058821348,0.00019572228,0.00045823725,0.000027237824,0.00003900699,0.00006278667,0.0011212567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026154123,0.000030187419,0.0033427845,0.00004339806,0.000058183374,8.2721846e-7,0.011326689,3.6141653e-8,0.0000029997786,0.030196125,0.95419776,0.00079836533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077708224,0.000025673835,0.00016472599,0.000021295464,0.000006846741,6.663637e-8,0.024840234,0.0000018977014,6.16948e-7,0.0005026471,0.9742184,0.00013988678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019825097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022520315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038064707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022063755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002486027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367844675","doi":"10.1080/00220388.2023.2188113","title":"Revisiting the Determinants of Non-farm Labour Income in the Peruvian Andes: The Role of Intra-Seasonal Climate Variability and Widespread Family Networks","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Development Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Diversification (marketing strategy); Climate change; Geography; Indigenous; Population; Agriculture; Household income; Socioeconomics; Demographic economics; Economics; Agricultural economics; Ecology; Business; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.024224773416638923,"score_gpt":0.30739563798485164,"score_spread":0.2831708645682127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367844675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996016,0.0020489183,0.0000250079,0.0007091335,0.00017584416,0.00015436631,0.0000030177125,0.000003576717,0.00086408714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98847675,0.011166405,0.00011211615,0.00010556809,0.00011089231,0.0000035965738,1.6438351e-7,0.0000042844963,0.000020232315],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983592,0.00053791347,0.00044370876,0.000065363085,0.00037274335,0.00022104343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978071,0.0015314667,0.0003410798,0.00011288405,0.00018744956,0.000020031386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009148404,0.00008949654,0.00023617214,0.00003664056,0.00057275593,0.000022814047,0.00042617385,0.000033717653,0.0000024236551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004154954,0.00003734894,0.000039695908,0.00041299136,0.00040273246,0.000048504164,0.00015179762,0.00020441596,7.588645e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026396689,0.000014473056,0.8447875,0.000042866115,0.00009014168,0.0000020053476,0.13056915,0.000115469906,0.000028729639,0.0007307326,0.00003343471,0.023559123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010297469,0.000015208661,0.845446,0.0001351265,0.000028318516,0.000002652998,0.15224612,0.00032997498,0.000005719777,0.0011497705,0.000493711,0.000044402994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045885765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018600446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02351472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000392273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014906847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44052336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375852046","doi":"10.3386/w31212","title":"The Gender Well-being Gap","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender gap; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.47867364960473063,"score_gpt":0.5440275910483061,"score_spread":0.06535394144357548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375852046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016567974,0.00059703586,0.00000387538,0.001423217,0.0023091957,0.0004428358,0.00004039968,0.00003898479,0.99348766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5738537,0.04475826,0.000092535396,0.00006162116,0.0063694427,0.00018020974,0.00039346935,0.00011969351,0.3741711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99452716,0.0004821193,0.0006024414,0.00045804444,0.003206764,0.0007234824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933769,0.0032707958,0.0002522493,0.0003300388,0.0026238824,0.00014610187],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018776275,0.00016369521,0.0003026028,0.00048745688,0.0013689401,0.00022493393,0.0010796569,0.00048437304,0.00028370463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029566747,0.00014300137,0.00020799135,0.00040953505,0.00085941167,0.00011615749,0.00022818844,0.0008514306,0.0007868747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006959976,0.000016605602,0.0026505985,0.000043414788,0.0001362894,0.0000028791712,0.0014203535,0.00015928334,0.0000027643016,0.79948044,0.19550179,0.0005786165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010556921,0.000014216254,0.0035542187,0.000025510239,0.0000089019895,0.0000013056932,0.00425025,0.00021728793,0.0000014570659,0.6552462,0.33642343,0.00015166085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009894339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00722327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6193165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025838588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012723332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376274352","doi":"10.4324/9781003383277","title":"Marriage Under Stress","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stress (linguistics); Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.035821833424823736,"score_gpt":0.2948060931011675,"score_spread":0.25898425967634375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376274352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000862251,0.000108063396,0.00037059546,0.00036428263,0.0022962883,0.00022900666,0.00014245277,0.00041549667,0.9959876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00034103767,0.0009482468,0.00008480095,0.000488523,0.001092435,0.000008052589,0.00016281645,0.000056138742,0.99681795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840295,0.0000723535,0.00019240758,0.00033522205,0.00057740853,0.0004196847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920136,0.00017364314,0.00008106937,0.00028768647,0.000098246324,0.00015802457],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003308894,0.0001988675,0.00024529462,0.00010718231,0.00033836282,0.00012002388,0.00045856283,0.0005686696,0.001293275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003971658,0.00019264,0.00013295008,0.00014709058,0.0002253973,0.00006186845,0.00009582622,0.00028733368,0.00153169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.426683e-7,0.000011456922,0.00031680873,0.00002720412,0.00004993437,0.000015922635,0.0026591325,0.000018420504,3.603948e-7,0.69759095,0.29896516,0.0003437067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014691432,0.000015507638,0.0021267133,0.000063647945,0.000055154458,1.7751584e-7,0.017320197,0.00002628314,2.0734727e-7,0.23315741,0.74656445,0.0005233494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011612879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024208821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46443355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029884675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011916428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377115996","doi":"10.1093/polsoc/puad009","title":"Assessing public support for social policy in times of crisis: evidence from the Child Tax Credit during the COVID-19 era in the United States","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"George Mason University","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Social policy; Context (archaeology); Population; Political science; State (computer science); Tax credit; Welfare state; Economic growth; Economics; Public economics; Sociology; Politics; Law; Demography","score_opus":0.08488794607422877,"score_gpt":0.3870377407013322,"score_spread":0.3021497946271034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377115996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79923856,0.00011669573,0.000053757907,0.19944787,0.00005920852,0.00035247623,0.00020663606,0.00003769832,0.00048710598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98396105,0.002246065,0.000039903065,0.012422818,0.001084173,0.000058711255,0.0000509205,0.000011159829,0.00012521686],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810654,0.0005276463,0.00027597326,0.00021220234,0.00036499984,0.00051265396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976168,0.0019299617,0.00013596671,0.00017725912,0.00006730917,0.00007268824],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002841969,0.00012602055,0.00017812829,0.00009818639,0.0018563174,0.00035101722,0.00056408526,0.0001375857,0.000013107443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017908019,0.000076227996,0.00013880529,0.002130163,0.0005506262,0.0003296573,0.000110023546,0.000294899,0.0000010114259],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009085786,0.000042117103,0.07583523,0.00006297155,0.000048649687,0.000001046679,0.8621452,0.0001708486,0.000018004272,0.037964106,0.0235366,0.0001661626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003713226,0.000011367126,0.48532623,0.000018788927,0.000015619424,5.038392e-7,0.48115024,0.0011080502,0.0000017921545,0.020470869,0.011410726,0.00011448905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14134736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009341711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.409491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018345781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009939108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377942048","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_256","title":"Gender and Household Economics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.07992719004331841,"score_gpt":0.2592736210929754,"score_spread":0.179346431049657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377942048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00097083265,0.00017679026,0.000054069482,0.00012663711,0.0008703481,0.00016907048,0.00008936203,0.0002468753,0.99729604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040673874,0.012600043,0.00020807018,0.00056186796,0.00048787502,0.0000030368972,0.0000225278,0.00007340976,0.9819758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903136,0.000011886382,0.00019067361,0.00034414584,0.00014620351,0.0002757086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994358,0.00007790536,0.00007907032,0.00021246039,0.000037806287,0.0001569627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026680468,0.00019711569,0.00023782763,0.0001005856,0.00026307834,0.00010801188,0.00019233854,0.00046736564,0.00021088118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012273873,0.00020477972,0.00008409084,0.000021452071,0.00024262306,0.000070181755,0.00008990109,0.00019874593,0.00020603008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.5581433e-7,0.000002126263,0.00031321484,0.000009176721,0.000038000533,0.000004148596,0.001653104,0.00000765328,1.6241202e-7,0.9931455,0.004202548,0.00062349584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012871235,0.000011937549,0.0018291754,0.000010546559,0.000049199,9.5252216e-7,0.0032098615,0.000043303215,9.7808886e-8,0.30880398,0.6854569,0.00045533603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042328855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030819534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68434155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008113426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023450273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83506745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377942116","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_257","title":"Gender and Social Security","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Social security; Computer security; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.0522069988966878,"score_gpt":0.28895312566931686,"score_spread":0.23674612677262907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377942116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036376028,0.00011351955,0.00003635915,0.0003188919,0.00069491286,0.00016546478,0.00006859363,0.00023603554,0.99800247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018798733,0.001265414,0.000055599787,0.0005201495,0.0009547004,0.0000031965335,0.000038320944,0.000046940895,0.97831696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878144,0.000027144202,0.00016142223,0.00031645087,0.00041780694,0.0002957082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957085,0.0000624686,0.00006951724,0.000107734304,0.00009352269,0.00009588347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033217948,0.00018793672,0.00023736218,0.00007570769,0.00057448784,0.000086845495,0.00016830087,0.0005910283,0.00057282904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013509107,0.0001911755,0.00010175814,0.000033222637,0.00035531918,0.000056035897,0.000097781725,0.00028046544,0.00027009536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011104343,0.0000031970642,0.00016048003,0.000019105344,0.000035384488,0.000006894302,0.018050142,5.005684e-8,2.8703732e-7,0.97131324,0.010035176,0.00037496287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010306317,0.00000747628,0.0013740817,0.00000552623,0.00004319733,3.9365713e-7,0.008986684,0.00001067622,4.466628e-8,0.5268597,0.46228802,0.0003211578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048216552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033443864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45225284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065946166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022332603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7795911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378381559","doi":"10.1515/9780773590823-014","title":"Changing Canadian Families","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Political science; Geography; History","score_opus":0.022953161346421926,"score_gpt":0.20900607456579123,"score_spread":0.18605291321936931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378381559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003785797,0.0000039499364,0.000042600936,0.000079355115,0.00071660517,0.0004673747,0.0007765952,0.00022769677,0.99764794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009524435,0.000774128,0.00011196095,0.0002861891,0.0002049014,0.0000011705529,0.000050845443,0.00006818425,0.9889782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976941,0.00009607402,0.00019873312,0.0006017322,0.00046030816,0.0009490664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983005,0.000055526125,0.00019555735,0.0005041865,0.00027769446,0.00066655624],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002463469,0.00044922493,0.00044166954,0.0007861519,0.0020434577,0.000058766913,0.000859331,0.00083772326,0.00014244574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015692585,0.0005706717,0.00025319922,0.000039092964,0.0005210695,0.00015659785,0.00026277968,0.0005402603,0.00005213785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010465771,0.0000050427693,0.000030566945,0.000026716689,0.0001116517,0.00019071932,0.007079413,0.00000262472,3.4844464e-7,0.99039,0.0010883535,0.0010640655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021082304,0.000023574255,0.00004663218,0.000084753825,0.00015230138,5.803452e-7,0.0052788304,0.000002913335,0.000004199298,0.0025297578,0.991033,0.0006326164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49579555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017577106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98994464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092014327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005323734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378555538","doi":"10.15453/0191-5096.3067","title":"Journal of Sociology &amp; Social Welfare Vol. 32, No. 2 (June 2005)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Harvard Kennedy School; University at Albany; Harvard University","keywords":"Sociology; Social Welfare; Welfare; Economics; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.022761735708295643,"score_gpt":0.303418494841428,"score_spread":0.28065675913313237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378555538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77070826,0.0021599275,0.00029254766,0.21549226,0.0061141765,0.00024904238,0.000071575676,0.000043604225,0.00486863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781917,0.00116383,0.00050512585,0.0021952,0.01579658,0.0000032193636,0.000011854041,0.000056395445,0.0020761075],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99273777,0.0030302624,0.001667894,0.0002447236,0.0010242056,0.0012951146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99311537,0.00049074076,0.0027346706,0.00020704248,0.0031411916,0.00031101578],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006836048,0.00043037668,0.0012712983,0.00023591465,0.0049008704,0.00005793783,0.0017560968,0.0013076619,0.001479564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011236733,0.00033182156,0.0009961859,0.0002883801,0.0048975484,0.00045187862,0.00016824555,0.0023519548,0.00008701729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000855226,0.00072755467,0.013567653,0.000055336397,0.0017588469,0.000057891528,0.5819461,0.00017767237,0.00097434013,0.14054696,0.2548622,0.0044702166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021809293,0.00028186294,0.05265871,0.000015304462,0.00054636924,0.00008668075,0.17572471,0.000007442978,0.0000047614076,0.013840442,0.7541762,0.00047660532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013517142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009918533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49931398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086435233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010609213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378555728","doi":"10.15453/0191-5096.3344","title":"&lt;em&gt;Restructuring Family Policies: Convergences and Divergences.&lt;/em&gt; Maureen Baker.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.02633869421342977,"score_gpt":0.2750390866024366,"score_spread":0.24870039238900682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378555728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841362,0.0030999342,0.000063720916,0.00824615,0.0019124604,0.00019082225,0.000044569726,0.000046397094,0.0022597362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884415,0.008254881,0.00013409536,0.0010491735,0.0016886223,0.0000031604934,0.0000040646896,0.000024940262,0.00039956108],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964354,0.0010415834,0.00068922655,0.00024391097,0.0008063822,0.00078351644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980624,0.00032378137,0.0007232986,0.00016612622,0.00047922094,0.0002451817],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017496535,0.0003076724,0.00063283165,0.00011613039,0.0049621062,0.000051294384,0.0010034293,0.0005234301,0.00022968082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022938686,0.00023170222,0.0002808158,0.00033391803,0.0034372632,0.000325076,0.00018520193,0.0007022692,0.000014066208],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001415878,0.000088881505,0.15288956,0.000033893928,0.0005333915,0.00008283722,0.7856487,0.00010483633,0.0013041167,0.04794043,0.009873526,0.0013582088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055880926,0.0001409761,0.71061933,0.000012057442,0.00014657994,0.00005361924,0.2665463,0.000016876855,0.0000055893765,0.010452772,0.011144065,0.00030299427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080561405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001268481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5577298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018429685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004584038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380480447","doi":"10.1111/padr.12562","title":"The US Council of Economic Advisers on Changing Female Labor Force Participation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Population and Development Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.09300016891910831,"score_gpt":0.34267245338763574,"score_spread":0.24967228446852743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380480447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98928815,0.00591483,0.00005152285,0.0009895817,0.0003441082,0.00047074765,0.0000031851998,0.00008656553,0.0028512937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93977493,0.057482477,0.0001391145,0.0005770296,0.000037651054,0.000050316212,0.000033142984,0.000008643664,0.0018967069],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922293,0.000061688064,0.00023219378,0.00009987713,0.00022096951,0.00016232819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965197,0.000061140534,0.0001094292,0.00006977188,0.00006656468,0.000041154577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013255653,0.000056261953,0.000110150264,0.000029557199,0.00035659203,0.000022805483,0.000054937405,0.000023878321,0.000011003426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013282464,0.000043087024,0.000018702918,0.00020823634,0.000025881043,0.000058087135,0.00001550032,0.0000242977,0.000031783984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011965977,0.000024236972,0.69562507,0.00089243293,0.00004161773,6.73613e-7,0.034802083,0.00052370405,0.000004583737,0.09179175,0.0014270593,0.17485482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108527354,0.000008524593,0.75644714,0.00034210374,0.000012230112,6.453132e-8,0.001589373,0.000510009,0.0000027925294,0.00033467487,0.24053878,0.00010576051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011290856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010246038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23911172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019887419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000271291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27426535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380627372","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2022-063","title":"Economic Security and Fertility: Evidence from the Mincome Experiment","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Economic rent; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05165462936218456,"score_gpt":0.3073748761888515,"score_spread":0.25572024682666694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380627372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75903356,0.009126596,0.000001378169,0.222244,0.0016649253,0.00023347458,0.00080494443,0.00004808345,0.0068430393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984884,0.0034989244,0.00001229684,0.004856979,0.0015470086,0.00003193928,0.000032411164,0.0000215987,0.0051147942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974617,0.0003730827,0.00027077223,0.00047441755,0.00020517765,0.0012148855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738604,0.0004423614,0.000074309995,0.00052644487,0.000055914974,0.001514947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086396653,0.00022061463,0.00022949043,0.00022304263,0.0010271706,0.0005233954,0.0007255403,0.00024742068,0.00040699053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052982924,0.00021540247,0.00008742515,0.0009065612,0.0010295135,0.0005303245,0.00014372243,0.00023576779,0.00064377853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049482755,0.000026686555,0.33239648,0.000033781347,0.00015585189,0.000036329868,0.16442853,0.000008376468,0.000013162593,0.35461774,0.12501374,0.023264373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015017201,0.000020260008,0.44084218,0.000044067732,0.000020796273,0.0000015869738,0.023758307,0.0020191858,0.0000021259834,0.023629198,0.50920147,0.00031064154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9688404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96494865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38418773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023125224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0098636905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381336488","doi":"10.1017/s0047279423000314","title":"Competition and childcare quality: Evidence from Quebec","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Quality (philosophy); Christian ministry; Subsidy; Demographic economics; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.060543607976657185,"score_gpt":0.3855921848844354,"score_spread":0.3250485769077782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381336488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760456,0.0002294269,0.00005229075,0.020540757,0.00035711518,0.0000532537,0.00003135327,0.000031528016,0.0026586496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923016,0.0014609542,0.00007886078,0.00059663254,0.0048650475,6.659609e-7,0.000003964144,0.000007990433,0.00068427774],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986547,0.000279065,0.00029253392,0.00008821917,0.0004639428,0.00022151374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991567,0.00019130528,0.00026675026,0.000050439197,0.0002080074,0.00012678934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084513763,0.000072793315,0.00020333736,0.00014561944,0.0005182672,0.00011465925,0.00017649002,0.00011220786,0.000022903054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006400363,0.00007102237,0.0000985019,0.0004999872,0.00023087076,0.00032408093,0.00003818171,0.00018056727,0.000019074478],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060819628,0.000074371106,0.12703256,0.00004632698,0.00014877036,0.000034138135,0.5268059,0.000016595022,0.0015058588,0.30555433,0.012572784,0.026147565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021350646,0.000020481155,0.91845363,0.000049350987,0.00001847723,7.846549e-7,0.05637342,0.0000058655264,0.000003503249,0.018978424,0.0057911677,0.00009140542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09607018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030118952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79142106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019737468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006247445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98757887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382518913","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4487054","title":"Family States and the Income Gap between Men and Women in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.009802984160172622,"score_gpt":0.2429869361962248,"score_spread":0.2331839520360522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382518913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951641,0.0013404764,0.00002074004,0.0017406225,0.000077913144,0.00010756899,0.000009602587,0.000011417532,0.0015275503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96727777,0.031552184,0.0000029400444,0.0001107861,0.00011574713,0.000005608894,0.0000023027046,0.000008610018,0.0009240455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721694,0.00025488742,0.00018434253,0.0001233494,0.00030205873,0.0019184245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945,0.00025250885,0.00006574055,0.00006520575,0.000032304313,0.00013423001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041771396,0.00008871447,0.00017900289,0.000076263794,0.00046122834,0.000080560836,0.00020271838,0.00004028385,0.0000030124188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069632464,0.00006458325,0.000016250178,0.00038086256,0.0001673471,0.00010402416,0.000049422284,0.0007265625,0.0000016522672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002443228,0.0000036747654,0.9314045,0.0000048032116,0.000083016006,0.0000064492706,0.027589327,0.000039620543,0.000006672808,0.03524766,0.00014386182,0.005446031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007310823,0.000027395912,0.38595626,0.0000049836462,0.000007746977,0.0000038001074,0.30878755,0.00018437149,1.327917e-7,0.30365014,0.00055822136,0.00008832645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83051264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96580213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5454482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020463434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068285987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99880177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382703613","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4487319","title":"Economic Security Policy and Canada’s National Action Plan to End Gender-Based Violence: Is there a Role for Cash Transfers in Addressing Intimate Partner Violence?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Action plan; Action (physics); Cash; Cash transfers; Business; Political science; Computer security; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Economics; Finance; Computer science; Environmental health; Medicine; Management","score_opus":0.030368859897366117,"score_gpt":0.32034055979552956,"score_spread":0.28997169989816346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382703613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99612397,0.00021595604,0.00040414566,0.0020368816,0.00017114224,0.00025026719,0.00012964106,0.000024052379,0.00064391835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633896,0.002895233,0.00002205885,0.0003357151,0.00029518647,0.00002088594,0.000014403208,0.00001562049,0.0000619292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976804,0.000108995286,0.00022840039,0.00023157628,0.00031503962,0.0014355602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954903,0.00009713516,0.00006985883,0.000057973815,0.00007170383,0.00015432152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015327884,0.00013178172,0.00015159449,0.0002327215,0.0005570637,0.000101036094,0.00018564315,0.00010158662,0.000017136714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005733117,0.00013719547,0.000053306947,0.00021538173,0.00005877328,0.00016372127,0.000011491519,0.0004911503,0.0000031007817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006759717,0.00020882982,0.2550274,0.00021593657,0.00047749883,0.000023504377,0.072259925,0.022653215,0.0011457502,0.5481285,0.0016866477,0.09749682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002061644,0.00024058201,0.07616286,0.0002084122,0.000039003015,0.000031012067,0.12372594,0.020071091,0.000106175146,0.7736394,0.0030465806,0.00066730706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3421012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95718014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6150789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034504863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021098135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98445135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382917269","doi":"","title":"Quand déclencher l'accouchement c'est confisquer la maternité aux femmes: Une analyse psychosociologique du travail des femmes (ouvrage bilingue français-anglais)","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.045074191033251367,"score_gpt":0.2778649263957871,"score_spread":0.23279073536253572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382917269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6165401,0.006662991,0.0099517135,0.006635035,0.0009705519,0.0010537666,0.0005074139,0.0003857111,0.35729274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78356904,0.014983036,0.0046746554,0.0006002648,0.00016481146,0.00021792932,0.0012966087,0.00016806362,0.19432561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97800547,0.016352719,0.0014303817,0.0017041811,0.0012539452,0.001253304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98938215,0.003977029,0.0011670361,0.002211783,0.0026695558,0.0005924755],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013582214,0.0010481541,0.0011656068,0.0003871067,0.0027890846,0.00073996675,0.0027178978,0.0011717814,0.0036812082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015085344,0.0011211683,0.00074416806,0.001410808,0.0042868652,0.00037717613,0.00074630586,0.001707012,0.00022129678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071787,0.003292847,0.28964677,0.0007324831,0.0011469863,0.00012679848,0.3115078,0.00022745466,0.0014883813,0.34782156,0.010063923,0.03387319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037623378,0.000017926672,0.24101388,0.0026211254,0.001116815,0.000059023612,0.097441316,0.0053222356,0.0014704303,0.022170369,0.62084526,0.0041592875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04495338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069694854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6107813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093363225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020373557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384132964","doi":"10.1002/jid.3816","title":"Impacts of agricultural capital subsidies for women in Burkina Faso: Lessons from a Computable General Equilibrium model","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development; Department for International Development, UK Government; International Development Research Centre; Government of Canada","keywords":"Subsidy; Social accounting matrix; Computable general equilibrium; Economics; Endowment; Agriculture; Agricultural productivity; Economic inequality; Inequality; Unemployment; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Macroeconomics; Geography; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.032560307921932936,"score_gpt":0.30460296684270777,"score_spread":0.27204265892077484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384132964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962942,0.00007248668,0.00076156587,0.0012142542,0.0008441428,0.00009817279,0.000055186214,0.000010423128,0.0006495676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916835,0.0001640542,0.006426185,0.000047101414,0.00021364364,0.0000089286605,0.000032209726,0.000007098054,0.0014173099],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846965,0.000033094962,0.0005037421,0.00010731539,0.00056205015,0.0003241561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896145,0.00010669812,0.00029232734,0.000037176993,0.00048538338,0.00011696031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007328251,0.00009797385,0.0002290815,0.00021303541,0.00006757911,0.000054135293,0.00034063225,0.00006069651,0.000015455056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000143917,0.000080480415,0.0000806109,0.0002078938,0.000046510217,0.00025968874,0.00007150846,0.00009515683,0.0000033176873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002379165,0.00044570517,0.37139553,0.000056794433,0.0007950691,0.00003492907,0.37062785,0.2116629,0.02503102,0.011522446,0.006818339,0.0013715044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010295383,0.00004683916,0.9413343,0.000088167,0.0000072131884,0.0000031045797,0.032159936,0.014975449,0.0005174471,0.0085327905,0.0011246393,0.00018054538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034838822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007899823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56993884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006941977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007277968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3281896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384253992","doi":"10.18574/nyu/9781479814138.003.0008","title":"5 Social Parenthood in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"New York University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.05365183541320966,"score_gpt":0.23083941120297002,"score_spread":0.17718757578976035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384253992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038856312,0.00004043743,0.000013309361,0.00010854659,0.000666973,0.0002518328,0.00014234094,0.00010109492,0.9982869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009985934,0.00013421164,0.000025158113,0.00008158756,0.00035870992,2.8273482e-7,0.00003061988,0.000033714063,0.9893498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984138,0.00006853084,0.0001559514,0.0003687648,0.0005589352,0.00043399984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993184,0.00007749714,0.00013997096,0.00018639583,0.00006125551,0.00021648363],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000110681256,0.00022976725,0.00031716077,0.00012217536,0.00044732215,0.000038862956,0.0006148957,0.00039831776,0.000036864898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000091786205,0.00031272482,0.0001092831,0.000029389214,0.00014671158,0.00004023421,0.00016249482,0.00045008954,0.000010604509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001832159,0.0000041092057,0.0004195952,0.000017672035,0.00006098026,0.00020696412,0.010863302,0.00001196612,3.1560586e-7,0.9271684,0.058588166,0.0026401617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036411316,0.000006891231,0.00080648,0.00004510963,0.000057357352,1.7173124e-7,0.0077682976,0.000007113538,2.3911602e-7,0.0031378595,0.9874567,0.00034966375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9767432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99483097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92886853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014772776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005777288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384347289","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4449095","title":"The Impact of Child Benefit Programs on Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Parents' Health: Evidence in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Child health; Environmental health; Medicine; Economic growth; Business; Political science; Geography; Family medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.017976886584419736,"score_gpt":0.2957067205872105,"score_spread":0.2777298340027907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384347289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931079,0.005324256,0.000012017608,0.00084906863,0.00018450936,0.00039990043,0.0000075169946,0.000011435036,0.000103360275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93943655,0.060275316,0.00000194286,0.000060486575,0.00009664109,0.000007693616,0.0000035120866,0.000013133941,0.00010470226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960494,0.00015233153,0.00033740507,0.00017321481,0.0005453111,0.002742313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920344,0.00015240166,0.00023721922,0.00014856733,0.00007827727,0.00018008912],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028332546,0.00013802164,0.00021517213,0.00010346124,0.0013296872,0.000079259844,0.00042205342,0.000057271165,0.0000012847482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008194086,0.000098326425,0.00007171544,0.0007156069,0.00008844534,0.00010348687,0.00002854626,0.0010342358,0.000002199003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037069203,0.000051672156,0.8918286,0.000007637387,0.00008063008,0.000006942864,0.029508095,0.00086776534,0.0000018715533,0.0012179776,0.000021044774,0.076370716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037298875,0.0010785967,0.8940053,0.00014841143,0.000008734634,0.000031018877,0.08744285,0.00013543713,7.6727645e-7,0.016448373,0.0001378433,0.00018968231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95970035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07618103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051938454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030044839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384519800","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4512485","title":"Later-Life Mortality and the Repeal of Federal Prohibition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02365486542258022,"score_gpt":0.2987848979491577,"score_spread":0.2751300325265775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384519800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933487,0.00040771972,0.00033271665,0.0021439514,0.00019263639,0.0001345229,0.000002623488,0.00003262249,0.0034045135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99251753,0.005978375,0.000008533067,0.00009548252,0.00026753143,0.000003190225,0.000002595901,0.0000068421823,0.001119943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810207,0.0002794973,0.0002116387,0.000106812244,0.00032770436,0.00097227475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999559,0.00006562301,0.00013096198,0.00008546965,0.0000923493,0.000066626555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044498285,0.00006700713,0.00012950909,0.000043466516,0.0006403526,0.000073140975,0.00014587036,0.000060374274,0.000008240993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018979354,0.000046717276,0.000069565605,0.00025356928,0.00028616152,0.00012836879,0.000026656311,0.0005585003,0.000003905572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007228038,0.00003133661,0.14737263,0.000010701683,0.00014951787,0.0000027316719,0.013362616,0.00004076955,0.00010321054,0.83668107,0.0002596111,0.0019135462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001405429,0.0001006343,0.18235229,0.000012714719,0.00004452862,0.000021872553,0.0665684,0.00047814593,0.0000054269485,0.748307,0.0005687389,0.00013485631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012281365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011207867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088374086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013679377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015377695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62542534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384786352","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4501316","title":"Later-life Mortality and the Repeal of Federal Prohibition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02365486542258022,"score_gpt":0.2987848979491577,"score_spread":0.2751300325265775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384786352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933487,0.00040771972,0.00033271665,0.0021439514,0.00019263639,0.0001345229,0.000002623488,0.00003262249,0.0034045135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99251753,0.005978375,0.000008533067,0.00009548252,0.00026753143,0.000003190225,0.000002595901,0.0000068421823,0.001119943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810207,0.0002794973,0.0002116387,0.000106812244,0.00032770436,0.00097227475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999559,0.00006562301,0.00013096198,0.00008546965,0.0000923493,0.000066626555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044498285,0.00006700713,0.00012950909,0.000043466516,0.0006403526,0.000073140975,0.00014587036,0.000060374274,0.000008240993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018979354,0.000046717276,0.000069565605,0.00025356928,0.00028616152,0.00012836879,0.000026656311,0.0005585003,0.000003905572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007228038,0.00003133661,0.14737263,0.000010701683,0.00014951787,0.0000027316719,0.013362616,0.00004076955,0.00010321054,0.83668107,0.0002596111,0.0019135462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001405429,0.0001006343,0.18235229,0.000012714719,0.00004452862,0.000021872553,0.0665684,0.00047814593,0.0000054269485,0.748307,0.0005687389,0.00013485631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012281365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011207867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088374086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013679377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015377695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62542534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385210955","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2023.16858abstract","title":"A Pay Raise, with a Bonus Cut: The Unintended Effects of Interventions to Close the Gender Pay Gap","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Gender pay gap; Psychological intervention; Unintended consequences; Gender gap; Business; Labour economics; Public economics; Economics; Psychology; Demographic economics; Political science; Wage; Law","score_opus":0.040458523964820726,"score_gpt":0.319026825756438,"score_spread":0.27856830179161723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385210955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8703744,0.00021934908,0.0007771379,0.053106073,0.00040963155,0.0043668696,0.000014310582,0.0003372803,0.070394985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98845184,0.000551853,0.00020422916,0.0010247619,0.000083862615,0.0001863859,0.0000015996168,0.000021091955,0.0094743585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981865,0.000055642748,0.00033369425,0.00030052618,0.00068653753,0.00043707681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993086,0.00013411145,0.00023154938,0.000118159805,0.000118741125,0.00008887056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014667703,0.0001646,0.0002115866,0.000197435,0.0003951196,0.00006096619,0.0009231251,0.00008950924,0.000014874805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014448127,0.0000788329,0.00015153886,0.0016769913,0.00045298968,0.00018113163,0.00032967434,0.00027491653,0.000023384651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008176971,0.00017224111,0.011837969,0.0019485785,0.00054452923,0.000004747823,0.08011274,0.00003477419,0.00025151108,0.8350692,0.06336226,0.0065797106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017442357,0.00040162928,0.56475425,0.0010430365,0.00088478014,0.0000024298129,0.25175333,0.00018737116,0.0006004936,0.06944635,0.10857129,0.00061078905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010067692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004416723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7656228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042988908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024814515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3214712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385224113","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4519213","title":"Later-Life Mortality and the Repeal of Federal Prohibition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National University of Singapore","keywords":"Repeal; Law; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.02365486542258022,"score_gpt":0.2987848979491577,"score_spread":0.2751300325265775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385224113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933487,0.00040771972,0.00033271665,0.0021439514,0.00019263639,0.0001345229,0.000002623488,0.00003262249,0.0034045135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99251753,0.005978375,0.000008533067,0.00009548252,0.00026753143,0.000003190225,0.000002595901,0.0000068421823,0.001119943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810207,0.0002794973,0.0002116387,0.000106812244,0.00032770436,0.00097227475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999559,0.00006562301,0.00013096198,0.00008546965,0.0000923493,0.000066626555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044498285,0.00006700713,0.00012950909,0.000043466516,0.0006403526,0.000073140975,0.00014587036,0.000060374274,0.000008240993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018979354,0.000046717276,0.000069565605,0.00025356928,0.00028616152,0.00012836879,0.000026656311,0.0005585003,0.000003905572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007228038,0.00003133661,0.14737263,0.000010701683,0.00014951787,0.0000027316719,0.013362616,0.00004076955,0.00010321054,0.83668107,0.0002596111,0.0019135462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001405429,0.0001006343,0.18235229,0.000012714719,0.00004452862,0.000021872553,0.0665684,0.00047814593,0.0000054269485,0.748307,0.0005687389,0.00013485631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012281365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011207867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088374086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013679377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015377695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62542534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385421073","doi":"10.3390/healthcare11152165","title":"Women Agro-Entrepreneurship Promoting Vegetables at a Family Level: A Healthcare Approach towards Non-Communicable Disease Risk Reduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Business; Focus group; Entrepreneurship; Health care; Citizen journalism; Production (economics); Environmental health; Participatory action research; Qualitative research; Non-communicable disease; Public health; Economic growth; Marketing; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.09561171372729604,"score_gpt":0.3270346610965143,"score_spread":0.23142294736921826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385421073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98296154,0.0021522446,0.000060507573,0.009025296,0.00094432966,0.0013470086,0.0003707618,0.00073517277,0.002403115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888174,0.0056812493,0.0005845443,0.00047034488,0.0005215744,0.00042180854,0.00030188466,0.0000779208,0.0031232634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99418944,0.001549619,0.0005866249,0.0009007387,0.0009968313,0.0017767416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99692065,0.0001160176,0.0003248391,0.0010087466,0.00038524272,0.0012445053],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026201145,0.00034990816,0.000530451,0.00026549253,0.0030368993,0.00016456403,0.0007031189,0.00031502557,0.000016218792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040170213,0.0003658904,0.00016843106,0.0018488723,0.00027222067,0.00031857158,0.00035676663,0.00067349104,0.000111342924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017297106,0.00026928828,0.6106181,0.0019399532,0.00007153516,0.000035374003,0.35459954,0.0004286124,0.00012450226,0.0030920045,0.001994724,0.026653357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069165253,0.00014525918,0.76035917,0.00022949597,0.000037208607,0.000004467274,0.22232161,0.0032752026,0.000008996856,0.005877815,0.0064029437,0.0006462111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037555646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004124158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14974101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015253678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016472639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385443861","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4527338","title":"Educated Couples’ Location Choice and Intra-Household Bargaining","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.021364661549282887,"score_gpt":0.2834610621983929,"score_spread":0.26209640064911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385443861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906949,0.002096091,0.0019053897,0.0015320516,0.00051160244,0.00011655106,0.0000014998682,0.00016424395,0.0029776779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98030996,0.017000875,0.000026870137,0.00017405592,0.00060786714,0.0000034465786,0.00000666514,0.000021329643,0.00184892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750805,0.00011683079,0.00018866807,0.00017300856,0.00030068806,0.0017127722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944687,0.00010609286,0.000096047705,0.000090744965,0.00012340788,0.00013681783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023455704,0.000104138664,0.000117777956,0.00014166528,0.0008249807,0.00013655575,0.00020750923,0.00009991145,0.000009339847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002566078,0.000104983184,0.000033059234,0.00082281866,0.00011144821,0.00021514086,0.000023572813,0.00089592935,0.00002653629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001651997,0.00008779039,0.19702399,0.000014965056,0.00019481151,0.000005424789,0.023267092,0.0011391799,0.00065617514,0.7455445,0.001656263,0.030393304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014296919,0.0002857996,0.23223864,0.0000683418,0.00010738933,0.00009427062,0.30409727,0.0042273616,0.000012026068,0.43643975,0.020259555,0.0007399083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001131904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008556614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30910474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059992884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034227218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63451684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385449643","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.2023-br01","title":"Lamb, Sarah. <b><i>Being Single in India: Stories of Gender, Exclusion, and Possibility</i></b>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.12304248790488599,"score_gpt":0.3811822330741647,"score_spread":0.25813974516927873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385449643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827004,0.0075954013,0.000072938936,0.0001344282,0.000929841,0.0001546193,0.000007987283,0.000019403482,0.008384956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948524,0.004285314,0.00041817914,0.00008172684,0.00016530755,0.000002784963,6.987491e-7,0.000007845921,0.00018573299],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978123,0.000393461,0.0007086016,0.000176612,0.00059047295,0.00031858138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977848,0.00073121913,0.00048075512,0.00010689242,0.00080628024,0.00009006241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016595966,0.00016811406,0.0007238879,0.00035031632,0.0003778065,0.00003503996,0.00021364298,0.000079000856,0.000001781875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037016976,0.00014131567,0.000093285256,0.0009814689,0.0007003074,0.0003234918,0.000096727046,0.00024808303,0.0000018636468],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007866106,0.00016344365,0.4413331,0.000068562156,0.00020995937,0.000037144888,0.5451644,0.00013401224,0.0020478377,0.006999777,0.003551097,0.0002119765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043870386,0.00016386615,0.53995585,0.000074636126,0.000023636656,0.0000011117766,0.4486721,0.000015534912,0.00007911165,0.009473773,0.0009970671,0.00010463425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016018028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015640396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09862275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017034417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021708496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57626855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385462060","doi":"10.3390/women3030030","title":"Factors Influencing Post-Marriage Education and Employment among Bangladeshi Women: A Cross-Sectional Analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Empowerment; Demography; Cross-sectional study; Logistic regression; Inequality; Toilet; Educational attainment; Higher education; Age at first marriage; Medicine; Socioeconomics; Gerontology; Psychology; Geography; Economic growth; Population; Sociology; Fertility; Economics","score_opus":0.021191963650227196,"score_gpt":0.30525625137295875,"score_spread":0.28406428772273157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385462060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968888,0.000022269978,0.000010311152,0.000051043964,0.00041214094,0.00014493463,0.00004283947,0.00013979437,0.00228782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99300843,0.00002866142,0.000014377119,0.00016259817,0.00014860388,0.000089668014,0.00006184927,0.000011433727,0.006474372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851245,0.00009461564,0.00020719861,0.00029394982,0.00039197397,0.0004998015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992833,0.000093613584,0.00008457944,0.00014717688,0.00013295488,0.0002583858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007380224,0.000120614415,0.00016877738,0.00036833482,0.0006121464,0.0002790856,0.0001544731,0.00010841495,0.00023959526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013990597,0.000117518124,0.00006257889,0.0015168544,0.00016802286,0.00027724015,0.000058899306,0.00010004314,0.000021336924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028209681,0.000026079653,0.8555415,0.0000057266525,0.00010884057,6.2192015e-7,0.14343229,0.00010660344,0.00006658486,0.0004809298,0.000036051642,0.00019191581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081109945,0.000023794755,0.8658978,0.0000017112241,0.000012632512,5.9162733e-8,0.13196382,0.00006260096,0.0000015422994,0.0008847938,0.0009494031,0.00012075774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025407984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017774486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011468475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007267792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031007297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47922498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385594121","doi":"10.59962/9780774836395-011","title":"Canada, the United Kingdom, and Patriation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; Political science; History; Geography; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.026885861854707368,"score_gpt":0.20609704141067775,"score_spread":0.17921117955597038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385594121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01319157,0.00011975689,0.0000257637,0.00005718372,0.00029837145,0.0003785894,0.00093514804,0.000029221983,0.9849644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.092934005,0.00051848247,0.000033209904,0.00006587175,0.00008464778,1.3933068e-7,0.00003939641,0.000014689478,0.90630955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990414,0.00005891948,0.000108240754,0.00022799884,0.0003815753,0.0001819059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898696,0.00007427357,0.0003048075,0.00026780472,0.00026662403,0.00009950632],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019987821,0.000081985505,0.0002128306,0.000025022802,0.0013434635,0.00023222722,0.000514464,0.00025771162,0.00005256238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028218072,0.00016235976,0.00006227459,0.000004945936,0.0007309742,0.000054475237,0.00015353342,0.00021710667,3.7041374e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061581406,0.000042079464,0.005927182,0.00033823008,0.0009484023,0.00088632584,0.019031053,0.000022500177,0.0000043295313,0.316903,0.55714685,0.09868849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029504197,0.000011860242,0.0111960145,0.00012274022,0.00011952803,0.0000030276196,0.00077471946,0.000027925558,2.708345e-8,0.0017523767,0.98550564,0.00019110394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4283588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014194452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080648815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385599803","doi":"10.59962/9780774828635","title":"Patriation and Its Consequences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.02636222953136908,"score_gpt":0.2173143917115434,"score_spread":0.19095216218017433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385599803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016325457,0.0012918708,0.000016912616,0.000013407944,0.0003028588,0.0004709489,0.00088105997,0.00007481659,0.98062265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020621289,0.0017802123,0.000112144786,0.000021388607,0.00010432114,3.2361365e-7,0.000043153814,0.000012709862,0.97730446],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987143,0.0001507573,0.00014365489,0.0003082054,0.00046297334,0.00022007986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883866,0.00006895909,0.0002502731,0.00012280003,0.00054030376,0.00017901213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035938018,0.0000880248,0.00031003822,0.000035870373,0.00037302112,0.00016591215,0.00033339663,0.00043346963,0.000050853232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004962906,0.00022153153,0.000073245,0.000016837586,0.0008276014,0.00011722944,0.00012206741,0.00018829542,0.0000026873367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047327423,0.00008187643,0.002106266,0.00058183324,0.00042273386,0.0005979862,0.04648287,0.0000082063525,0.000017460103,0.030725596,0.8818963,0.03703151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084310124,0.0000740698,0.0015589506,0.00031838857,0.00021463612,0.000009635345,0.006752546,0.00003898761,2.5179833e-7,0.012940699,0.9767899,0.00045886502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34148374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6031573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26167354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018914232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013392736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9033794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385651509","doi":"10.4054/demres.2023.49.8","title":"Women’s employment trajectories in a low-income setting: Stratification and change in Nepal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demographic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Stratification (seeds); Low income; Demographic economics; Economics; Socioeconomics; Geography; Development economics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.09605083574743309,"score_gpt":0.38802525402418725,"score_spread":0.2919744182767542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385651509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967422,0.00016734427,0.0000025776349,0.0016467894,0.00011982552,0.00057664444,0.000009091979,0.000062846186,0.0006726814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974532,0.0017097959,0.000028125023,0.00003169124,0.00010415032,0.00045953138,0.00001212527,0.000011438254,0.00018995258],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971858,0.00064186373,0.00022903194,0.0003343975,0.0007765354,0.0008323395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992213,0.00031575907,0.000027297463,0.00017782935,0.00010347408,0.00015432795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055166534,0.00008987146,0.00014143171,0.0012328136,0.0003341433,0.00013926308,0.00024041646,0.00013610368,0.00001649424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023002455,0.00009296757,0.000024362573,0.0048015937,0.00039572443,0.00019455516,0.00006606111,0.00037274716,0.000010704286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011127697,0.000042229247,0.8753562,0.00003132709,0.0000039669394,0.000016066368,0.11384424,0.0000027003398,0.00006536647,0.007597709,0.000024444362,0.003004599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023185095,0.00004825813,0.9318188,0.000035898523,5.8248213e-7,1.6874293e-7,0.05923198,0.00060287677,0.0000017886208,0.0076048076,0.00033195192,0.000091049704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01002101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06488193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05646256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018743418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017249807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99657136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385745229","doi":"10.59962/9780774821940-010","title":"The Disappearance of Parents from Children’s Lives: The Cumulative Effects of Child Care, Child Custody, and Child Welfare Policies in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Child care; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Medicine; Pediatrics; Law","score_opus":0.006524001708145158,"score_gpt":0.1744807322512625,"score_spread":0.16795673054311736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385745229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3385247,0.0064246044,0.0000024694232,0.00004722916,0.00025599846,0.001282093,0.003008216,0.000017433407,0.6504373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982815,0.0041160495,0.0000067486344,0.000031752836,0.00004565257,0.0000012694101,0.00003361556,0.000023364153,0.012926512],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982904,0.000162706,0.00030527823,0.00037447148,0.0005436867,0.00032342828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985887,0.00017148508,0.000542098,0.00038507883,0.00020644206,0.000106242056],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011122546,0.00019510751,0.00055178377,0.000037492027,0.0012611775,0.000063035994,0.0008869289,0.00021365646,0.000013456815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003085833,0.00027274844,0.00014403298,0.000027615313,0.0019461118,0.0000681749,0.00031837585,0.00044006662,1.4392911e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003611772,0.00029726053,0.40327233,0.0017065741,0.0033627497,0.00023014382,0.45162347,0.00013435287,0.0000012857383,0.07120205,0.003387061,0.06442155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011020113,0.00006304229,0.94789344,0.0025958635,0.00024798026,0.0000043088044,0.024040002,0.0000062773966,0.00000215685,0.0007877169,0.02283318,0.0004240461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99864495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6442903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018550885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034254603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385747087","doi":"10.59962/9780774816328-013","title":"Of Scalar Hierarchies and Welfare Redesign: Child Care in Four Canadian Cities","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Scalar (mathematics); Continuum of care; Sociology; Economics; Economic growth; Mathematics; Health care; Market economy; Geometry","score_opus":0.011315419368368218,"score_gpt":0.17985248889654673,"score_spread":0.1685370695281785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385747087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054018185,0.00074515917,0.0000016958677,0.000045127952,0.00019012185,0.0004395503,0.0018484655,0.000025514231,0.9426862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56934994,0.0013947131,0.00027676977,0.000022358752,0.000049677637,4.563962e-7,0.000036312675,0.000026127478,0.42884362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881333,0.00006276326,0.00018105873,0.0003210706,0.00031584874,0.00030591525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990824,0.000037999063,0.00016406053,0.00020936104,0.0002753289,0.00023086272],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014361732,0.00012438906,0.0004132791,0.00015530805,0.00060922996,0.00009441537,0.00042094832,0.00058730843,0.00012629297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020547772,0.00029827372,0.000104950625,0.000015947913,0.0014849826,0.00007477422,0.00011858077,0.00045112477,2.6802314e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016633335,0.00008737943,0.09415425,0.0038480847,0.00090194016,0.0034574503,0.31730622,0.000013277536,0.00003318231,0.41519928,0.013610174,0.15122241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009771395,0.00010963275,0.06296398,0.0010808713,0.00015065749,0.000017902394,0.041527394,0.0000038823523,7.432258e-7,0.0057598534,0.8866668,0.00074118766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9750275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8730566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013414928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050388096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385771440","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4538028","title":"When Women's Work Disappears: Marriage and Fertility Decisions in Peru","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; Competition (biology); Demographic economics; China; Marriage market; Consumption (sociology); Liberalization; Labour economics; Demography; Population; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.016161031222161646,"score_gpt":0.2777284648091973,"score_spread":0.2615674335870356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385771440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99514914,0.00084050547,0.00039297022,0.0014835368,0.0002600514,0.00011942401,0.0000029050923,0.00005382847,0.0016976402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98551494,0.010858055,0.00004458544,0.0000920287,0.00014833886,0.000008947311,0.0000019563854,0.000014224003,0.0033169065],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632794,0.00028024634,0.00024842113,0.00022743107,0.00039227644,0.0025236644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993489,0.00019548235,0.000062783736,0.00014319843,0.000048401907,0.00020123008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004585268,0.00011869317,0.00017729616,0.00016894455,0.00057474436,0.00013962698,0.00030742408,0.00011358563,0.000048409904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004537834,0.00010981149,0.00005799584,0.0007703639,0.00014993295,0.00020544468,0.00007018498,0.0011316536,0.000045455887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013510053,0.00013139768,0.718283,0.0000048150728,0.0000889254,0.000030075858,0.09678812,0.000056250847,0.000046631758,0.11829374,0.00040762825,0.065734334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036771098,0.000050592294,0.3646754,0.000017351389,0.00000580376,0.000004623931,0.12565373,0.000045095778,1.3245423e-7,0.50602555,0.0030219445,0.0001320482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036066613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014050082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38773182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011889613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001599527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7840276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385855121","doi":"10.1515/jgd-2023-0012","title":"When Women’s Work Disappears: Marriage and Fertility Decisions in Peru","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Globalization and Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Fertility; Competition (biology); Demographic economics; China; Consumption (sociology); Marriage market; Liberalization; Labour economics; Total fertility rate; Population; Family planning; Research methodology; Demography; Market economy; Geography","score_opus":0.02827342598881736,"score_gpt":0.2941686500609365,"score_spread":0.26589522407211913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385855121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99561363,0.00020761679,0.002227137,0.0005896996,0.00024981904,0.00007328082,0.0000016922193,0.00001337777,0.001023758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959098,0.0016056534,0.0019152781,0.00020982698,0.000028190683,0.0000024613812,0.0000024595424,0.0000037419911,0.00032254827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896616,0.00009595793,0.00032235272,0.000096507094,0.0003255861,0.00019341959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995292,0.000060495357,0.00009752112,0.000042845255,0.00010623445,0.0001636969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011892815,0.00006435284,0.0001321972,0.00012322546,0.00019983137,0.000090409674,0.00008273304,0.00005792902,0.000034813573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030601997,0.00005602821,0.000013640814,0.00042695532,0.00006019772,0.0001373472,0.000047424328,0.000060150785,0.0000049044847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003990607,0.00004398607,0.88364965,0.0000066641196,0.00001545246,0.000013624832,0.09686023,0.000053851192,0.0000048158113,0.0015614219,0.0015065162,0.016243868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003224744,0.000010810045,0.92412925,0.000044298562,0.0000020778298,0.0000012739183,0.032083057,0.00003149581,5.86342e-7,0.0032748051,0.040032003,0.00006788173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028940389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036901262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06477717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022979929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027510937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22847642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385855361","doi":"10.59962/9780774818155","title":"The Business of Women","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.01611884180983349,"score_gpt":0.18842362122045922,"score_spread":0.17230477941062572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385855361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019021377,0.00032979526,0.00003211559,0.0000039896295,0.0003903855,0.0003780868,0.00037719778,0.000045012956,0.97942203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009374774,0.001845523,0.00007681635,0.00001176652,0.00007462139,7.349139e-7,0.00001192966,0.000019308349,0.9885845],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985149,0.00013555809,0.0002018355,0.00026413266,0.00046045694,0.00042311288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998267,0.000119375996,0.00039062998,0.00033959,0.0007400006,0.0001434077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047891322,0.00009805041,0.00038794643,0.000029029072,0.00065158017,0.00010007518,0.0010554729,0.00038246613,0.00011121971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004320809,0.00019644682,0.0001328513,0.000034481924,0.0018808864,0.000067526475,0.00024351176,0.0002158162,0.0000022645736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015002023,0.00029172798,0.0031742137,0.0011073116,0.0012696233,0.00035464892,0.15836233,0.0000070140654,0.000010763101,0.061704963,0.6418532,0.1317142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034336094,0.00003167247,0.008940997,0.00020467413,0.0000814097,0.0000018765884,0.008073435,0.0000021255307,1.4049466e-7,0.00572459,0.9763583,0.00023744392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5582488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6430345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33450508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033266266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013117478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8010869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385868492","doi":"10.59962/9780774850513-010","title":"Hammering Their Way through the Barriers: Low-Income Women Retrain to Be Carpenters","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Labour economics; Low income; Economics","score_opus":0.025215760825512842,"score_gpt":0.21678362326238304,"score_spread":0.19156786243687018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385868492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04912028,0.00014890055,0.00032021367,0.00006529762,0.00056338427,0.00086865656,0.0011112583,0.0001169893,0.947685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.101283856,0.0005110776,0.00027293467,0.0006488417,0.00017767852,0.0000018296394,0.000017917655,0.000058749938,0.89702713],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766207,0.00010792507,0.00028069783,0.0005625105,0.0006903866,0.0006964123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984308,0.00013952647,0.00024714458,0.00051242154,0.0002775308,0.0003926041],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006534012,0.00022117405,0.00051477953,0.000058410747,0.0010622895,0.00026040335,0.0012772228,0.00049396936,0.00040027456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039870458,0.000400792,0.000267288,0.000036662765,0.0012623485,0.00014276122,0.00040830905,0.00050556543,0.0000046276546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019654678,0.00007709754,0.0012506024,0.000502294,0.0015716201,0.0012160488,0.81630963,0.00008185507,0.000034045355,0.04772839,0.06444119,0.066590704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045919287,0.00007951421,0.0009086565,0.00042064604,0.00006805281,0.000006273607,0.0721253,0.00000921147,7.924788e-7,0.0025261058,0.9228449,0.0005513914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35676095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6382659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8584037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005570158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030563143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386037823","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4544583","title":"When Women's Work Disappears: Marriage and Fertility Decisions in Peru","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Psychology; Demography; Gender studies; Economics; Sociology; Population; Physics","score_opus":0.016161031222161646,"score_gpt":0.2777284648091973,"score_spread":0.2615674335870356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386037823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99514914,0.00084050547,0.00039297022,0.0014835368,0.0002600514,0.00011942401,0.0000029050923,0.00005382847,0.0016976402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98551494,0.010858055,0.00004458544,0.0000920287,0.00014833886,0.000008947311,0.0000019563854,0.000014224003,0.0033169065],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632794,0.00028024634,0.00024842113,0.00022743107,0.00039227644,0.0025236644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993489,0.00019548235,0.000062783736,0.00014319843,0.000048401907,0.00020123008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004585268,0.00011869317,0.00017729616,0.00016894455,0.00057474436,0.00013962698,0.00030742408,0.00011358563,0.000048409904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004537834,0.00010981149,0.00005799584,0.0007703639,0.00014993295,0.00020544468,0.00007018498,0.0011316536,0.000045455887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013510053,0.00013139768,0.718283,0.0000048150728,0.0000889254,0.000030075858,0.09678812,0.000056250847,0.000046631758,0.11829374,0.00040762825,0.065734334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036771098,0.000050592294,0.3646754,0.000017351389,0.00000580376,0.000004623931,0.12565373,0.000045095778,1.3245423e-7,0.50602555,0.0030219445,0.0001320482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036066613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014050082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38773182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011889613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001599527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7840276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386263126","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4539457","title":"Just Transition as Wellbeing: A Capability Approach Framing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Transition (genetics); Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Chemistry; Engineering","score_opus":0.018299360446002413,"score_gpt":0.2800341500038976,"score_spread":0.2617347895578952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386263126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95931834,0.00045861938,0.019245448,0.0016272693,0.0004350421,0.00019536848,0.0000029717107,0.00018225392,0.018534698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99324197,0.0036992354,0.00013341272,0.00014633968,0.0005796357,0.000006850436,0.0000118075495,0.0000202174,0.002160545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962668,0.00029824287,0.00024827445,0.00025399818,0.00053811184,0.0023945929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994377,0.000065813656,0.00008827778,0.00014310682,0.00011139365,0.00015370818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004349871,0.00013500125,0.00016713318,0.00014051629,0.0011600638,0.00011802625,0.00031928974,0.00016885849,0.000024393363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013995425,0.0001342447,0.00014762297,0.000766084,0.0001275215,0.00025270446,0.000017205793,0.0014512335,0.000079969555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037318714,0.00018094655,0.0077095986,0.000028547578,0.00014569632,0.000010752597,0.08533982,0.0010012588,0.00040849196,0.89665794,0.00021157642,0.008268042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060659845,0.00016342456,0.008368203,0.000014255094,0.0000700219,0.00007300275,0.45944157,0.0031549975,0.0000071772765,0.52339745,0.004337607,0.0003656714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014130772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030918391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37410176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010648943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031185513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.892239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386336461","doi":"10.1016/bs.hefam.2023.01.007","title":"An institutional perspective on the economics of the family","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Handbook of the economics of the family","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Property (philosophy); Positive economics; Variation (astronomy); Epistemology; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.039264364951607185,"score_gpt":0.2514657314632321,"score_spread":0.2122013665116249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386336461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33090878,0.0011004079,0.000023218025,0.002697642,0.0064685442,0.0016929104,0.0019057319,0.000043381166,0.6551594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82550824,0.015280894,0.00018127478,0.0035340863,0.0013019528,0.000046839566,0.000024753712,0.00023355619,0.15388839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770254,0.000216411,0.000827144,0.00051643274,0.000350792,0.00038669878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99587774,0.00050658296,0.0014351872,0.001791963,0.0003010362,0.00008748413],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012104315,0.00044513732,0.00068864354,0.00011976663,0.0009877939,0.00006497427,0.0038603614,0.00047940802,0.000030089557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015923985,0.00026007887,0.0010068015,0.00009898332,0.0031221416,0.00014809196,0.00061575044,0.0006551418,0.000036497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056286633,0.0000483628,0.00048128449,0.000020602807,0.0003222902,1.7455228e-7,0.005495296,0.0060812333,0.00015363598,0.98567086,0.0015162108,0.00015375203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012189682,0.00027179194,0.025573922,0.0012763401,0.00058125955,0.0000026668342,0.032948934,0.0015593896,0.0005282863,0.8923121,0.042596336,0.001129997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023018443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032022037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.501271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007857826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018622711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386367288","doi":"10.3102/ip.23.2013224","title":"Families and Feminisms: Exploring Shifting Gender Identities and Feminisms Through Daughter-Mother Relationships","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Daughter; Gender studies; Sociology; Gender identity; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.1747221413130342,"score_gpt":0.3211134407851477,"score_spread":0.1463912994721135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386367288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83318263,0.00029942565,0.0011325788,0.00036437338,0.00043773852,0.00015021827,0.0000088831375,0.00031844235,0.16410571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98345405,0.0041614273,0.0022123319,0.00021214601,0.00019761854,0.00003241164,0.0000082372335,0.000027729287,0.009694066],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985205,0.00014450843,0.00024337338,0.0003361673,0.00033321258,0.0004222427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921954,0.0004102703,0.000060895,0.00016052563,0.000048913298,0.00009987053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008439619,0.00015778345,0.00017315232,0.00011534383,0.001289961,0.00028849806,0.0001411249,0.00013049554,0.000055467768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001749427,0.00015292976,0.000037209964,0.00043885488,0.00038201013,0.0007774847,0.00012883528,0.0001748593,0.000042968295],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002260672,0.0000118224225,0.31711116,0.000040066036,0.00003441604,0.000007381241,0.44673672,0.000021015694,0.0000691716,0.2342771,0.00078483793,0.0009040427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001919197,0.000011985628,0.2208773,0.000020869758,0.00002192799,0.0000016706534,0.7231061,0.00017541046,0.000017565677,0.050461963,0.0048635206,0.0002497773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006119412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008466223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27636936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033476455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005618925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99214685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386548856","doi":"10.1177/23780231231192392","title":"The Effects of Head Start on Low-Income Mothers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Head start; Early Head Start; Low income; Head (geology); Psychology; Demographic economics; Developmental psychology; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.09373043711267107,"score_gpt":0.4382609919975771,"score_spread":0.344530554884906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386548856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98251003,0.00030664317,0.000117801894,0.0042606653,0.00066826603,0.001765347,0.00007785381,0.0003052219,0.009988163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97918814,0.0013770494,0.00010750127,0.00017188008,0.00017611384,0.00037980807,0.000026034284,0.000030255333,0.018543236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951243,0.0014164398,0.00032525932,0.00043706075,0.0011783645,0.00151859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982521,0.016437994,0.00008810172,0.00036603326,0.00035414213,0.0002327224],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066202465,0.0001831737,0.00033316543,0.00020090201,0.002639236,0.00007727449,0.0008466477,0.00027648365,0.00003040144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054390016,0.00012328559,0.00041143523,0.0014513687,0.0031606168,0.000057917372,0.0001656325,0.0007869811,0.00011833756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000480298,0.00052543875,0.031599704,0.00057840033,0.00041244095,0.00003666107,0.044720154,0.00020236257,0.0012229468,0.88343465,0.026123036,0.010663891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018086832,0.001811262,0.18659857,0.00025314084,0.000031278054,1.7336544e-7,0.07113887,0.0059275394,0.000022645752,0.6971407,0.034684937,0.000582228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003067529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002065668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18629399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005676024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038732833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386641255","doi":"10.54254/2754-1169/18/20230068","title":"Comparing the Efficiency of Gender Policy in Canada and the United States by the Female Employment Rate","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Demographic economics; Political science; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.026606144421581397,"score_gpt":0.2935609405208799,"score_spread":0.2669547960992985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386641255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97820044,0.0005353222,0.000023744276,0.0055154534,0.00013343699,0.0002612555,0.000008725358,0.000006336212,0.015315301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98699373,0.011688685,0.000012639131,0.0011001932,0.000022354408,0.000017314318,0.0000026552084,0.000002689427,0.00015972862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872094,0.00019649685,0.00024435457,0.00019529847,0.00013624929,0.00050663284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989466,0.0008132778,0.00006395856,0.00010672955,0.000010457083,0.000058970676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017839422,0.00008617965,0.00013862853,0.00009950614,0.00048207623,0.000093760966,0.0004359923,0.000014796866,0.000002334882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053597956,0.000046935267,0.0000149961015,0.00072755787,0.0019506585,0.00014257483,0.0001731336,0.00007586187,5.994261e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042112338,0.0000063143025,0.2584984,0.0000077554705,0.0000045071115,4.0305446e-7,0.0030805566,0.0052398364,7.287303e-8,0.7326817,0.00002567668,0.00045057872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009123232,0.00002739787,0.3766634,0.000020402886,0.000016898748,4.3380695e-7,0.27290484,0.07257,0.0000040464083,0.2520058,0.024638537,0.00023593355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71331924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8114404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4806759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014082638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001504607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71872824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386699039","doi":"10.32920/24134964.v1","title":"Women’s Work in India: Evidence from changes in time use between 1998 and 2019","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Caste; Work hours; Leisure time; Paid work; Demographic economics; Psychology; Demography; Sociology; Working hours; Economics; Political science; Labour economics; Medicine; Physical activity","score_opus":0.07423840442741336,"score_gpt":0.3052089318152091,"score_spread":0.23097052738779572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386699039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99693125,0.00054333755,0.000019701129,0.0009327894,0.00048936927,0.0005088836,0.0001593216,0.000116663716,0.00029867925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98069906,0.0077432366,0.0006371416,0.00022227531,0.00044165674,0.00013195108,0.000101936224,0.00003466712,0.009988059],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976389,0.00033163765,0.00030682364,0.00066642644,0.00047423132,0.000581978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981395,0.00119994,0.00012028776,0.00034146928,0.00002964166,0.0001691764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014712597,0.00023884857,0.00049117213,0.0003348913,0.000089744615,0.00030456675,0.0006096286,0.0006584509,0.00008070969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036704185,0.00024355247,0.000035943234,0.00062344305,0.00017172174,0.00018839934,0.0008807402,0.00066008716,0.00020712284],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007541587,0.000014012918,0.93907547,0.000015818414,0.000018095949,0.0000128999345,0.059526015,0.000020799922,0.0000029136954,0.00003748151,0.0006185077,0.00065041747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012047564,0.000011056392,0.9876979,0.00041349832,0.000009431161,1.5841644e-8,0.005976673,0.0000349323,5.8386723e-7,0.004938793,0.00051387405,0.0002827543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071668014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07825275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05354934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049161725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000268272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386699169","doi":"10.32920/24134964","title":"Women’s Work in India: Evidence from changes in time use between 1998 and 2019","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Leisure time; Work hours; Caste; Paid work; Demographic economics; Psychology; Demography; Working hours; Economics; Sociology; Labour economics; Political science; Physical activity; Medicine","score_opus":0.07423840442741336,"score_gpt":0.3052089318152091,"score_spread":0.23097052738779572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386699169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99693125,0.00054333755,0.000019701129,0.0009327894,0.00048936927,0.0005088836,0.0001593216,0.000116663716,0.00029867925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98069906,0.0077432366,0.0006371416,0.00022227531,0.00044165674,0.00013195108,0.000101936224,0.00003466712,0.009988059],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976389,0.00033163765,0.00030682364,0.00066642644,0.00047423132,0.000581978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981395,0.00119994,0.00012028776,0.00034146928,0.00002964166,0.0001691764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014712597,0.00023884857,0.00049117213,0.0003348913,0.000089744615,0.00030456675,0.0006096286,0.0006584509,0.00008070969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036704185,0.00024355247,0.000035943234,0.00062344305,0.00017172174,0.00018839934,0.0008807402,0.00066008716,0.00020712284],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007541587,0.000014012918,0.93907547,0.000015818414,0.000018095949,0.0000128999345,0.059526015,0.000020799922,0.0000029136954,0.00003748151,0.0006185077,0.00065041747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012047564,0.000011056392,0.9876979,0.00041349832,0.000009431161,1.5841644e-8,0.005976673,0.0000349323,5.8386723e-7,0.004938793,0.00051387405,0.0002827543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071668014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07825275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05354934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049161725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000268272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386951101","doi":"10.20429/aujh.2023.130206","title":"‘Following the Line of Least Resistance’: African American Women in Domestic Work, 1899–1940","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Armstrong Undergraduate Journal of History","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Subordination (linguistics); Patriarchy; Gender studies; Intersectionality; Resistance (ecology); Capitalism; Race (biology); White (mutation); Sociology; Black women; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.02316363995172625,"score_gpt":0.2700591549979411,"score_spread":0.24689551504621485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386951101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840451,0.0013555532,0.00016524244,0.004282225,0.00126504,0.00011789716,0.0000030916174,0.00003187611,0.008733995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919456,0.0005919581,0.00022976939,0.000084643434,0.00017958913,0.0000054982816,0.0000014476285,0.000024417235,0.006937063],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973192,0.00043009376,0.00064593897,0.00017280037,0.00078902004,0.0006429364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829054,0.00042161238,0.00070945115,0.00022819985,0.00014373523,0.00020644939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024288073,0.00015971305,0.00047083647,0.00040244634,0.00022582588,0.000022501343,0.0005680122,0.000052348605,0.000010881586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040084386,0.00013022208,0.0002220494,0.0013846422,0.00083914865,0.00019264859,0.00004608239,0.00043860462,0.000009835412],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011960762,0.0011474258,0.30818015,0.00020011287,0.0012414664,0.0018175439,0.56740683,0.017387914,0.002932049,0.024542695,0.06359485,0.010352853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026615718,0.0005846338,0.3925319,0.00045741166,0.00021401783,0.000014947011,0.39694026,0.00012955915,0.0000060757134,0.01896167,0.18668425,0.00081370096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056659733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028318076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17046659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019704776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010182804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53103024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387066375","doi":"10.1007/978-981-99-5526-8_5","title":"Women Returning to the Family","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Unpaid work; Labour economics; Work (physics); Paid work; Sociology; Care work; Gender studies; Demographic economics; Economics; Working hours; Engineering; Market economy","score_opus":0.04796077099872453,"score_gpt":0.2749011285387209,"score_spread":0.22694035753999636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387066375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011049492,0.00007948546,0.00015704405,0.0017413703,0.0016049772,0.00033913553,0.000030491092,0.00028410094,0.99465847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003377164,0.0007106584,0.000111244015,0.0030351758,0.000888077,0.000022712862,0.000010504195,0.00005602838,0.99178845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983208,0.000038925675,0.00020982017,0.00033032915,0.00060773897,0.000492377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990953,0.00016010653,0.00007538964,0.0003519935,0.00011740089,0.00019978384],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009399838,0.0002029368,0.00022807156,0.00010009653,0.0006142641,0.00014086968,0.0006196476,0.0003203642,0.00046874216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000897126,0.00014723063,0.00010048128,0.000118015756,0.00013441681,0.000042978772,0.00015396404,0.0003514304,0.00254073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002884573,0.0000023221623,0.00007521696,0.0000064815795,0.0000450941,0.00000897765,0.048020307,0.000014718729,0.0000044426724,0.8932275,0.05558089,0.0030111317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036627836,0.000021013935,0.00074102177,0.000022846956,0.000011025157,1.401868e-7,0.029331677,0.000011203271,5.239703e-8,0.03620692,0.93338376,0.0002337102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009448976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004463618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87780285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024014362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028958067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387066408","doi":"10.1007/978-981-99-5526-8_7","title":"Education Equity in Light of Families’ Time Investment in Childcare","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Investment (military); Recreation; Equity (law); Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Family income; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.03159966039917665,"score_gpt":0.311351841525129,"score_spread":0.27975218112595235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387066408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042170864,0.00023048656,0.0000016146606,0.00040106286,0.00055494177,0.0004543641,0.000028791987,0.000049557428,0.99406207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012377071,0.0019077257,0.00011004395,0.0005618607,0.0001695524,0.000019630932,0.000117420896,0.000035045225,0.98470163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985535,0.000046983037,0.00039678378,0.0003028932,0.00044173302,0.0002581073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993916,0.000052216772,0.00013602393,0.00024030122,0.00009833106,0.000081511214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047817046,0.00018211144,0.00032743817,0.00039354185,0.00005718724,0.000021012354,0.00030973507,0.0003987654,0.00024223156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052856416,0.00018671266,0.0000800816,0.00018656145,0.00012865287,0.00007174588,0.000137585,0.0002306498,0.00020537831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025547256,0.000060201128,0.0025134832,0.000044692566,0.000012463923,0.0000021206026,0.014180877,0.0000073380793,0.000011439163,0.978053,0.002437429,0.0026744273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006637151,0.000116299154,0.072175965,0.0010656506,0.00005970573,3.8870655e-7,0.039960288,0.0000908922,0.000010570781,0.59740376,0.28719726,0.0012555303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006001372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046297226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38064924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045088987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012550673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97110534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387162583","doi":"10.2307/jj.7249492.9","title":"A Single Mother Returns to Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.036202426172184235,"score_gpt":0.25157518923669736,"score_spread":0.21537276306451314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387162583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020625208,0.00002921187,0.00004223302,0.0018090089,0.0014012761,0.00022604875,0.00008835045,0.00014189913,0.9960557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004146515,0.00007569792,0.00017864817,0.0027413103,0.0004448603,0.0000037726857,0.000014062283,0.000059966438,0.99233514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986405,0.000014541229,0.0001648258,0.00028883127,0.00055110746,0.000340207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930537,0.00006433291,0.000052109855,0.0002368539,0.00010959072,0.0002317636],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001565772,0.0001760844,0.000204926,0.00006915258,0.0001940612,0.000057084348,0.00030146432,0.00025530942,0.0010238248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045966997,0.00017180538,0.0000651135,0.000072361196,0.0000606771,0.000018705095,0.000057176607,0.00015718806,0.00027203065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023423706,0.0000063318867,0.00012252503,0.0000106934785,0.000051354953,0.000040831448,0.0073689935,0.00000943147,0.0000074011127,0.8288524,0.16201693,0.0015107568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034286306,0.00001536811,0.00013598386,0.000023849607,0.000013563942,1.8363632e-7,0.004351784,0.000004812094,4.522615e-7,0.014490866,0.9806601,0.00026876162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.866687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81864315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046079772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012975587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387326794","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.12675","title":"The Effect of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Physical and Mental health—Results from the Atlanta Paycheck Plus Experiment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Milbank Quarterly","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University; National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Atlanta; Receipt; Mental health; Earned income tax credit; Earnings; Randomized controlled trial; Medicine; Economics; Tax credit; Public economics; Finance; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.013803452197776296,"score_gpt":0.29275294864991297,"score_spread":0.2789494964521367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387326794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98880714,0.00019660877,0.0000033400909,0.008397879,0.00082831987,0.0006078723,0.00028000138,0.000048106147,0.00083071535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986365,0.00010673854,0.0000037740385,0.00019776377,0.0004185056,0.00003579741,0.00002704978,0.000011852267,0.0005620181],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773735,0.00079172535,0.00024335572,0.00026778894,0.00057576835,0.00038403386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982418,0.0010909609,0.00014296068,0.00041654543,0.00002070404,0.00008703543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009350537,0.00015619866,0.00021844744,0.000016642161,0.0012528396,0.00009667102,0.0005070855,0.000061811836,0.000003402743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006022278,0.00007336073,0.0001112403,0.0002828335,0.0004228348,0.000048950376,0.000054196655,0.00018867258,0.000025667658],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008913071,0.0001391558,0.023095544,0.000030260851,0.00020689871,0.0000053740673,0.87870705,0.000031861164,0.0017231269,0.0045647398,0.06252419,0.028080467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058744415,0.004820341,0.7408039,0.00018092027,0.000055378976,0.0000011894224,0.20574534,0.005020708,0.00047552597,0.003056454,0.03342896,0.00053686835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008255337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026982818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71770835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010490794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009365983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387347682","doi":"10.18356/9789210021890c007","title":"Survey data are representative of diversity in commitments and commitment-makers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"United Nations eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Scope (computer science); Accountability; Diversity (politics); Key (lock); Public relations; Political science; Survey data collection; Geography; Statistics; Computer science; Law; Computer security; Mathematics","score_opus":0.22993357258108185,"score_gpt":0.35746295988618776,"score_spread":0.1275293873051059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387347682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011638779,0.000066427594,0.000024703568,0.000113398135,0.0002980103,0.00086708827,0.008500866,0.000076449716,0.9784143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19657035,0.0013943788,0.0001887429,0.00016467474,0.000051390285,0.000009855195,0.00635218,0.000051961415,0.79521644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984449,0.0002729518,0.00028385437,0.00034742884,0.00046711665,0.00018373158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977979,0.00096323265,0.00029428408,0.0005153034,0.00034381836,0.00008544788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094350416,0.00016732654,0.00027391565,0.0021006726,0.00065189955,0.00003157863,0.00058924884,0.00025146414,0.000018720073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004181049,0.00019508519,0.00003317851,0.00043427973,0.0005428264,0.00007707034,0.0009771237,0.0002822711,0.00000774244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004084819,0.00010315247,0.33026344,0.000070704016,0.00056042284,0.000048614704,0.06766026,0.000033602784,0.0000011296953,0.58874017,0.0117916055,0.00068604545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00419188,0.00014066292,0.6281354,0.00085628673,0.0005337137,0.0000010541863,0.118147135,0.0010274913,0.0000026736725,0.060167983,0.18504699,0.0017487324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020011535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18907511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5285722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011686108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013018484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9865143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387623213","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4599649","title":"The Effect of Reducing Welfare Access on Employment, Health, and Children's Long-Run Outcomes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital; Carleton University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Business; Labour economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Public economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.012419586536440156,"score_gpt":0.3218296059764213,"score_spread":0.30941001943998114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387623213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884051,0.0017825235,0.000048272737,0.008538378,0.0004069222,0.0002655687,0.000004113431,0.00004827405,0.0005008401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820084,0.016613053,0.0000018770618,0.00008970155,0.00015960136,0.0000052402115,0.000003991724,0.000017122067,0.0011009866],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969124,0.00044683937,0.00026373772,0.00018098013,0.00044509472,0.0017509502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991842,0.00025419195,0.00021779547,0.00015615106,0.000043375716,0.000144282],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003926441,0.00013762045,0.00023331557,0.00011217879,0.0019364473,0.00015637705,0.0004554048,0.00006622698,0.0000036595138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022123735,0.00008941935,0.00010225303,0.000417371,0.00014664714,0.00014215303,0.000059497663,0.0008515366,0.0000046493456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048868376,0.000017906665,0.9023383,0.000010381326,0.0001883638,0.0000014332444,0.0031934846,0.00011558838,0.000002692326,0.0558889,0.00017574654,0.038018323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013045304,0.0016693781,0.95314485,0.000062139814,0.000046857218,0.000029961973,0.01911512,0.00004748068,0.000011999304,0.023481542,0.00081536855,0.00027078192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022284284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059979726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050806526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044640695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00110458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387808636","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2023-015","title":"Child Penalties in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024473651416975772,"score_gpt":0.25377788790292916,"score_spread":0.22930423648595338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387808636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36399883,0.002048886,7.0616596e-7,0.32909212,0.0034347696,0.00021869967,0.0008608587,0.00004857911,0.30029655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93860686,0.0016210255,0.000006852505,0.011242269,0.0013649404,0.0000178853,0.00007485066,0.00003250937,0.047032837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996413,0.00021486393,0.00031324866,0.00034904334,0.0004128469,0.0022970063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973511,0.00008428228,0.000065972345,0.00031986178,0.00010257803,0.0020762135],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005040602,0.00022703069,0.00026133755,0.001105023,0.00070673355,0.0001844763,0.0006846521,0.00021305987,0.00043886332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053143577,0.00028948384,0.00006605323,0.005656505,0.00036374814,0.0003371841,0.000054768967,0.00038483052,0.00041180267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.2824163e-7,0.00000866943,0.14161657,0.000029624787,0.0000255874,0.00017512843,0.007007223,0.000059915394,1.6688996e-7,0.6293911,0.20559013,0.016095476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013052659,0.0000053705166,0.30934608,0.000022116636,0.0000037552434,0.0000043946634,0.014815554,0.0004723761,9.1276846e-8,0.0026495054,0.6723046,0.00024564762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99999195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6267416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010516155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14142402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387808652","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2023-006","title":"Two Decades of Poverty Reduction Politics in Canada: Better for Single-Parent Families and Single Working-Age Adults?","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Saskatchewan; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04540251795653851,"score_gpt":0.27055752770894687,"score_spread":0.22515500975240835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387808652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9396821,0.0011990083,0.000007739287,0.045180645,0.0019313986,0.0004216016,0.0010155321,0.000027973527,0.010533999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930092,0.00046256598,0.00015299606,0.00269812,0.0011637544,0.000027147948,0.000121157915,0.000038988797,0.0023260356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704057,0.00014379612,0.00047268468,0.00041044163,0.00031435385,0.0016181271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982582,0.00015528974,0.00015101551,0.0002492732,0.000179426,0.0010068357],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034137708,0.00025388668,0.000358162,0.00096942636,0.00039061424,0.00014344142,0.00032373192,0.00021899457,0.000017588247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050139806,0.00030848343,0.000074730735,0.0022855443,0.0005497982,0.00026125903,0.000049907714,0.00019588624,0.000004016445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015712776,0.0001514684,0.34041396,0.0004498907,0.00015367787,0.00007585242,0.036383588,0.000110831075,0.00022439579,0.45719665,0.05805499,0.10676899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017913382,0.00018409886,0.24035014,0.00042675438,0.000073955336,0.000023796863,0.112982504,0.001774126,0.000052042404,0.020437166,0.6207767,0.0011273618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5627217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006150583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017821234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388081787","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199281879.003.0003","title":"Women’s Employment Patterns: Some Facts","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; European union; Mediterranean climate; Geography; Welfare; Subsidy; Demographic economics; Political science; Demography; Economics; Sociology; International trade","score_opus":0.0349551550103814,"score_gpt":0.2706393761026649,"score_spread":0.2356842210922835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388081787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007018721,0.00035178056,0.00011820782,0.0007078941,0.0010861875,0.00037729883,0.000101652884,0.00023592777,0.99000233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020765275,0.0039736126,0.000092810566,0.0028406112,0.0014794819,0.000025608375,0.000037349997,0.00006031621,0.97072494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774486,0.000029246872,0.00033278603,0.00045553196,0.00077052816,0.0006670681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990213,0.000049149425,0.00014679343,0.000352976,0.00009566037,0.0003341539],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031487414,0.00034921942,0.0003725905,0.00013204846,0.00030821763,0.00012597481,0.00044343382,0.0005288529,0.0073019452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012719656,0.00033176775,0.00015276278,0.000022283066,0.00015485268,0.00018025772,0.00009626624,0.0003099657,0.0010592687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035611042,0.000037187165,0.0011108527,0.000019051013,0.00009706249,0.000017410062,0.01761655,0.0000054422717,0.0000012696522,0.9649223,0.0049061817,0.011263126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016589665,0.000042980017,0.0012345264,0.000037196456,0.000020934644,4.2427547e-7,0.004636208,0.0000033770511,5.1383245e-7,0.033425756,0.9599232,0.0005089486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010719014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005197966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95501703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009260694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032537058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388590822","doi":"10.52975/llt.2023v92.0019","title":"Krys Maki, Ineligible: Single Mothers Under Welfare Surveillance (Halifax and Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing 2021)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.024005594025435915,"score_gpt":0.25874756719118575,"score_spread":0.23474197316574982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388590822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9521204,0.0010729862,0.00025331957,0.013393326,0.0008565163,0.0002532925,0.00020812023,0.00042088467,0.031421106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98039544,0.00076121476,0.00015945977,0.0008139037,0.0003949492,0.0000129419695,0.00006212384,0.00005361442,0.017346352],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974652,0.0002985615,0.00030129866,0.00052372745,0.00059943757,0.0008117558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989447,0.00014041238,0.000115517316,0.0003345147,0.00020371961,0.00026115816],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001182865,0.00024162096,0.00030079242,0.00017381221,0.00089732796,0.001006195,0.0004730044,0.00028236918,0.00019610875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025196752,0.00025406826,0.00007063016,0.0015695235,0.00031615197,0.00072318007,0.00010216675,0.00030051105,0.00008086769],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006817992,0.0004399474,0.5077618,0.00025760257,0.00031260826,0.00015908886,0.08953604,0.0014473397,0.0022861392,0.32222915,0.04275812,0.032744016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001192665,0.00005665073,0.6811498,0.000035603614,0.000015517913,0.00000507789,0.118630655,0.00028664558,0.000020281392,0.0069303224,0.19098061,0.0006961748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014363708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024304263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31529883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011578665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025285588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388653472","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3595342/v1","title":"Marriage and couples' well-being in Togo","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan; International Development Research Centre; University of Michigan","keywords":"Pooling; Context (archaeology); Ordinary least squares; Demographic economics; Marital status; Political science; Geography; Sociology; Demography; Economics; Population","score_opus":0.08478150036952484,"score_gpt":0.41566843876864784,"score_spread":0.330886938399123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388653472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89601356,0.00095846434,0.00009276035,0.002746329,0.0009252513,0.0014621523,0.000075519674,0.0002033585,0.0975226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779772,0.011680728,0.00015206961,0.000039382452,0.00049964816,0.00012720942,0.000066901965,0.000047366833,0.009409487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562716,0.000914617,0.00028508715,0.00068399764,0.0014627923,0.0010263404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809647,0.00078719546,0.000051980405,0.0004600114,0.00031932892,0.00028503686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059651756,0.0001849219,0.00031059145,0.00056903507,0.0005896764,0.0004065749,0.0006381345,0.0005403939,0.0001274446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001068384,0.00019872695,0.00007665881,0.0008718494,0.0004869269,0.00008577159,0.0013125354,0.0016911036,0.00016696037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040390227,0.0001438073,0.77313644,0.0016245082,0.00005903116,0.00046147508,0.11115532,0.0005549674,0.000054908975,0.1022454,0.00701491,0.0035088514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006488535,0.000089960115,0.59166825,0.0013184242,0.000013138922,8.4647644e-7,0.14978483,0.0047475137,0.0000053489375,0.21460372,0.03636298,0.00075615954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021330673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037564043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1814682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043028608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090233376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388771218","doi":"10.1515/9781552383544","title":"Give Your Other Vote to the Sister","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sister; Computer science; Genealogy; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03508237391257742,"score_gpt":0.24659641919203917,"score_spread":0.21151404527946174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388771218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002096005,0.0001316197,0.0038651864,0.00005956637,0.00036613367,0.0005031733,0.00007287641,0.000052734562,0.9947391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00020764637,0.00004371455,0.00045730153,0.0005775668,0.00022241309,2.3812461e-7,0.000009706637,0.00002240255,0.998459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854773,0.00012875261,0.00014151786,0.00029939503,0.00054031593,0.00034226212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989619,0.000097152115,0.00016342403,0.00039643378,0.00020330411,0.00017778784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003815332,0.0001966513,0.00027499712,0.00010704182,0.00045005916,0.00002943259,0.00092099665,0.00041807487,0.000053271768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013974759,0.00019036791,0.0002035925,0.000024283983,0.0005790504,0.000043693515,0.00022273154,0.00032802983,0.000028304357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023232221,0.000059108865,0.00025485372,0.00012130413,0.00045668086,0.00012465843,0.15962328,0.000041863288,0.000015140869,0.726153,0.09591513,0.01700264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018582224,0.00002998427,0.00027458157,0.00005399012,0.00011052107,4.0391689e-7,0.002609804,0.000019225325,0.0000024184071,0.0007788012,0.9957091,0.0002253325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012629582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028044099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.899794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019694946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042780352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388779583","doi":"10.1515/9781552382967-006","title":"Feeding the Family in Times of Change","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.06068712984623214,"score_gpt":0.2355727570690635,"score_spread":0.17488562722283135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388779583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083970587,0.0008555988,0.00004410251,0.000031846106,0.00013929588,0.00035197998,0.000031646952,0.00002319681,0.99768263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023771789,0.0022244249,0.00030277384,0.00009973472,0.00017855289,4.088099e-7,0.000009764218,0.000021760958,0.9733908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900734,0.000055155848,0.00016137116,0.00019672827,0.0003754368,0.00020398054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929684,0.0000875854,0.00022246264,0.00021915014,0.00011347385,0.000060499307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027057115,0.00015143216,0.00030332466,0.00012739288,0.00017269832,0.0000086870305,0.000574277,0.0003232258,0.0000890575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006972167,0.00015477072,0.00014051801,0.000013498087,0.0006871423,0.00007018117,0.00016182609,0.00026590214,0.000003025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026632239,0.000011734622,0.00014608084,0.000038956347,0.00004900845,0.000013214389,0.032287173,0.000003437201,0.000013642682,0.95780075,0.0003409822,0.009268421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042843906,0.000040329694,0.0020083124,0.00023505767,0.00012031768,3.9350203e-7,0.006452957,0.00016009258,0.000005069862,0.0049430975,0.9853116,0.00029431024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016866967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00810352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9849706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008548787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001397089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389069534","doi":"10.1111/1540-6229.12467","title":"Why do young adults coreside with their parents?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Real Estate Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Percentage point; Demographic economics; Marriage market; Point (geometry); Labour economics; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.017663782017332083,"score_gpt":0.24627402458766703,"score_spread":0.22861024257033496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389069534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92054915,0.000007895344,0.000038784947,0.00030673714,0.0004934054,0.00019491116,0.00010868982,0.00019254787,0.07810786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720341,0.026541932,0.00014014181,0.00020359326,0.00019893576,0.000018503424,0.00009347315,0.000035803416,0.0007335483],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988193,0.000059329293,0.00021017397,0.00031384313,0.00009545277,0.0005018822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992986,0.00010409489,0.00011099633,0.00023817911,0.00006487611,0.00018328422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032799406,0.00015290562,0.00019197658,0.00008052672,0.00034082166,0.00014274543,0.00027688534,0.00009255849,0.000021236447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021727463,0.00013818055,0.000054283813,0.0002524251,0.00018803125,0.000220969,0.00004887095,0.00010908023,0.00010789602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019085874,0.000080560996,0.7934074,0.000043966433,0.00012851818,0.000052574687,0.13313732,0.007151926,0.0000069040966,0.023529928,0.0052997065,0.03697036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019827224,0.00025967922,0.53003347,0.00008139626,0.000048890524,0.000008426533,0.32754466,0.016414663,0.000015676313,0.009215228,0.113224775,0.0011704208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017433766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07701522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2633739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016036374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024369483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389353036","doi":"10.5670/oceanog.2024.111","title":"Actions and Challenges Toward Building Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Arctic Marine Science: The Case of the Canadian Research Icebreaker CCGS Amundsen","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oceanography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aquaculture; Equity (law); Fishery; Environmental science; Inclusion (mineral); Business; Natural resource economics; Economics; Chemistry; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Political science; Mineralogy","score_opus":0.15861379529634914,"score_gpt":0.38093814311212837,"score_spread":0.22232434781577923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389353036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97947174,0.00026936672,3.2292783e-7,0.00866497,0.00016362756,0.00022743887,0.000008814346,0.000015038853,0.011178666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958104,0.004017889,0.000026012716,0.0000686955,0.00003253571,0.0000028209217,5.3030016e-7,0.0000043531954,0.000036775073],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836713,0.00024380417,0.000095781594,0.00022195182,0.00060989265,0.00046145119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991503,0.00023047032,0.00003286571,0.00019878689,0.00022151698,0.00016609568],"candidate_categories":["sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004882462,0.000067821726,0.00008641241,0.0007140833,0.013463695,0.00009958377,0.00054734154,0.000070472226,0.000004286685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023487538,0.000047822366,0.00003118014,0.004021664,0.002276273,0.00017192076,0.018449403,0.0002609227,3.7603868e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003528115,0.00002121436,0.74536294,0.000051951596,0.000012067708,0.000041514617,0.18712029,0.000007268399,0.00003666126,0.061414443,0.00006554862,0.0058625983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013455431,0.000020485966,0.8423731,0.000027042484,0.000011519102,0.000012737886,0.09950601,0.00018414657,0.0000033806593,0.05705071,0.00060011685,0.00007620992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49047053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92020637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42973584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013357692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003537313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9894892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389379926","doi":"10.26530/9789401496476-088","title":"The food delivery industry and its lack of care in gender equality: the speculative case of ‘GiGi’","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Academia Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CTS Forex (Canada)","funders":"Royal College of Art","keywords":"Food delivery; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.17366369282718713,"score_gpt":0.3567059421566676,"score_spread":0.1830422493294805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389379926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16608289,0.0088163335,0.000002839288,0.00010953488,0.0003928427,0.0010952279,0.00055666507,0.000042700816,0.82290095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89659894,0.0027261155,0.0000073082642,0.000118636366,0.0002097184,0.000024122517,0.000007407928,0.00004862145,0.10025914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803007,0.00025681022,0.0005475931,0.00033168084,0.0004972461,0.00033658996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793774,0.0009867492,0.00043414033,0.00030599153,0.00024665587,0.00008870646],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008941529,0.00025331802,0.00039577394,0.00007129052,0.00031101896,0.000029914374,0.0005016637,0.0021176229,0.000004277107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014455967,0.00017930062,0.00011325611,0.00003235602,0.00076468283,0.00004986072,0.00033721904,0.002320742,0.0000012518374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023510187,0.0000027449798,0.00040805354,0.00014001629,0.0001560113,0.000037245863,0.08754556,0.000021687863,0.0000061236224,0.90980005,0.00012593216,0.0017330514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029645006,0.0005264818,0.0083430745,0.0017608737,0.0013809464,0.00007090178,0.3794945,0.00039546352,0.000562612,0.31937099,0.28235182,0.0027778563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016611401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050528953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.730516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008674781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003149409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389618816","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4661765","title":"Policies Inclusive of Men Improve Women's Marriage Outcomes: Evidence from a Post-Colonial Reform","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Political science; Gender studies; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.017208177746478256,"score_gpt":0.31240915194515945,"score_spread":0.2952009741986812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389618816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857041,0.0015022369,0.00045970632,0.0069007846,0.0023793394,0.00064174354,0.00031619985,0.00011596364,0.0019798863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682033,0.023779586,0.00012788302,0.00024187354,0.001355525,0.00004964975,0.000029778637,0.000072799354,0.00613957],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928755,0.0004921339,0.0009157951,0.0005896976,0.0013362754,0.003790566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996894,0.0004240572,0.001138322,0.000574092,0.00067244377,0.00029711262],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052788956,0.00047584125,0.00091190863,0.00036739997,0.00074309047,0.00022373343,0.0019470936,0.0006933457,0.00005685525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011794977,0.00041914394,0.0004559842,0.0003991059,0.00038295676,0.00032921825,0.0012523186,0.00443564,0.000042514446],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008012128,0.00047403158,0.090924986,0.00028936396,0.0052018184,0.00008091545,0.69649017,0.00039282333,0.0038884354,0.19458824,0.00032830736,0.006539701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006994872,0.00049626885,0.04561752,0.00022394874,0.00017382308,0.0000062157274,0.28365973,0.00008028709,0.000017079697,0.6681053,0.00030083428,0.0006194779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14027816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10008285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4735171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014402451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02159459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390140209","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2023.102107","title":"Where did the time go? The effects of China's two-day weekend policy on labor supply, household work, and wages","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"China Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Bucknell University","keywords":"China; Work (physics); Hourly wage; Working hours; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Labour economics; Work hours; Working time; Wage; Demographic economics; Work time; Survey data collection; Wage growth; Political science","score_opus":0.01333531415758914,"score_gpt":0.2716450190667264,"score_spread":0.25830970490913724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390140209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84798276,0.10124055,9.897801e-7,0.03212905,0.0006301415,0.001371891,0.00009580526,0.0001070181,0.016441781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55136096,0.44275555,0.00000500058,0.0011229656,0.0003740359,0.000053177755,0.000008902213,0.000028286915,0.004291105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983524,0.00053182314,0.00032523114,0.00028971233,0.00012822714,0.0003725933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985548,0.0006165653,0.00020630808,0.0005144753,0.000012421147,0.0000953813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016389589,0.00020367622,0.0004489686,0.000053045376,0.000410725,0.000090284324,0.00060143386,0.00006742913,0.00006559577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025731322,0.00011975899,0.00014813102,0.00041682983,0.00033992372,0.000108832166,0.0001261238,0.00020725986,0.0002553905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032949727,0.00020229445,0.17339827,0.008168795,0.0005160905,0.00002357934,0.041620255,0.0004973118,0.000081188606,0.25578815,0.33140838,0.18826273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041347503,0.00008003619,0.72969604,0.0018852268,0.00010785114,0.0000016861308,0.00038335478,0.000073683725,0.000007325619,0.003162685,0.26385686,0.00033175747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009038683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035626593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5562978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009159861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018602032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48836297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390231551","doi":"10.34172/ijhpm.2023.8366","title":"Is Reformulation Still a Suitable Goal for Sugary Beverage Taxes? A Response to Recent Commentaries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Public Health Research Programme; University of Oxford; Medical Research Council; National Institute for Health and Care Research","keywords":"Economics; Public economics; Psychology; Marketing; Public relations; Computer science; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.059420140889694946,"score_gpt":0.420823058749194,"score_spread":0.3614029178594991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390231551","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32254764,0.00018132075,0.007459814,0.66546315,0.0017153365,0.0008737612,0.00022964818,0.00003541204,0.001493914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90920335,0.012746912,0.0033220546,0.064911254,0.0009251019,0.00003920378,0.000035862635,0.000019005489,0.008797229],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985275,0.00016120958,0.00041201164,0.00010970433,0.00049458386,0.0002949536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903345,0.00023157406,0.00023888607,0.000065686705,0.00027376346,0.00015663703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002788213,0.000075156546,0.00013721427,0.00047674746,0.00029154102,0.00009446092,0.00023019509,0.000034330358,0.000015626154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030319422,0.00007068099,0.000049056205,0.00026613643,0.000033911405,0.00019073668,0.0000958979,0.00006930023,0.0000056438525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031090768,0.0002922876,0.009861452,0.00021698885,0.0006330817,0.0000663248,0.14749727,0.001217384,0.00004150311,0.3007502,0.42239004,0.11392439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007889778,0.00018224625,0.06035604,0.000059890786,0.0000069921243,0.000002941124,0.0077129304,0.00014486887,0.0000019154995,0.010097484,0.92057675,0.00006895163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026699845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008667192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6005519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006120048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029366006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40362358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390278389","doi":"10.1016/j.red.2023.12.001","title":"Unmarried births: Accounting and equilibrium analysis, 1960-1995","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Dynamics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Economics; Birth control; Marital status; Demographic economics; Matching (statistics); Birth rate; Marriage market; Population; Family planning; Fertility; Demography; Medicine; Research methodology; Sociology; Pregnancy; Biology","score_opus":0.020503544351625047,"score_gpt":0.30501253707694426,"score_spread":0.2845089927253192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390278389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95629793,0.017652007,0.0002677754,0.0011566972,0.0006581314,0.00051344285,0.00020909996,0.0001705414,0.023074357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71322864,0.2840381,0.0003985942,0.00058192335,0.00018830155,0.000017685476,0.000224091,0.000033757547,0.0012888766],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835175,0.00012804876,0.00061091525,0.000349238,0.00015668436,0.00040338407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988915,0.00020392676,0.00035499057,0.0003500102,0.000070258524,0.00012934617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018617072,0.00016673729,0.0006529111,0.00024939145,0.00015771633,0.00006613322,0.00035939124,0.00010599448,0.00009369335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019256526,0.00017675938,0.0002442976,0.0010040255,0.00022026135,0.00023294079,0.00013758938,0.0001062738,0.00007732693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010265494,0.00006342331,0.7267606,0.0072005074,0.0014329801,0.000008966513,0.0042610383,0.0022471757,0.000037274,0.2318697,0.0025978752,0.023510192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011107265,0.00010109604,0.22552995,0.0033542654,0.0033599767,0.0000049054916,0.01782631,0.6475286,0.0000033104948,0.014695433,0.08437321,0.0021122203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082372676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003114523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64528143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022502847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002701987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7208038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390652679","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/j9skr","title":"Studying Individuals in Same-Sex Couples using Longitudinal Administrative Data from Canadian Tax Records: Opportunities and Challenges","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; University of Alberta; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Earnings; Sample (material); Census; Longitudinal study; Data quality; Survey data collection; Identification (biology); Demographic economics; Psychology; Demography; Business; Social psychology; Economics; Accounting; Population; Medicine; Statistics; Sociology; Marketing","score_opus":0.4905051666487619,"score_gpt":0.39467090280407524,"score_spread":0.09583426384468668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390652679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9275261,0.02180366,0.000034022203,0.0052184253,0.0014880816,0.0007482372,0.0072825747,0.00009390809,0.03580495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93559724,0.05936904,0.0023047419,0.00015082494,0.00048703357,0.000025856874,0.00067713944,0.000039740775,0.0013483844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970798,0.00031955884,0.0004589489,0.0010726711,0.0004850063,0.0005840498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983416,0.0003498416,0.00016170007,0.0006414225,0.000096404285,0.00040900553],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015892704,0.00036877484,0.00054949557,0.00038795607,0.00040618528,0.0006543592,0.00094418955,0.0004891083,0.00018813886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019458114,0.00038437184,0.000043125343,0.00015673331,0.00041777923,0.00021681219,0.0015453693,0.0007477875,0.000005678545],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001307955,0.00017166369,0.5542129,0.00062614103,0.0011135942,0.0008177529,0.38073057,0.00013202743,0.0000030235244,0.041949894,0.002451338,0.017777985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016056202,0.00003159773,0.08187749,0.0005510043,0.00017837317,0.000002195164,0.87660545,0.0033629308,4.4575486e-7,0.024511917,0.0119617535,0.0007562625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8807509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49587488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041882135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052772644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390773113","doi":"10.61959/p210910q","title":"Access to Parental Benefits in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Unemployment; Government (linguistics); Parental leave; Business; Work (physics); Disability benefits; Demographic economics; Disability insurance; Cost–benefit analysis; Income Support; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Social security","score_opus":0.1220199552713504,"score_gpt":0.36937889627820464,"score_spread":0.24735894100685424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390773113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22497705,0.00023369408,0.000006257214,0.0008550871,0.009662619,0.0005667275,0.00036405527,0.000108944216,0.76322556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9070299,0.0053769867,0.000042198575,0.0009583495,0.00094438915,0.000074458505,0.00021235472,0.00006364431,0.08529766],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972694,0.000049322844,0.00032280586,0.0003823817,0.0014212144,0.0005548928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913985,0.00008648262,0.00008275754,0.00020886051,0.00022350423,0.00025856012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005282773,0.00017901634,0.00031773248,0.00016176609,0.00016019118,0.00012818012,0.00070687116,0.0002056172,0.00022831529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025939167,0.00017973298,0.000052524785,0.0008424778,0.000026183456,0.00008607585,0.00020674808,0.00022428214,0.00004462441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011779354,0.000011725894,0.78014976,0.000029730942,0.000017876397,0.00006168504,0.0015219453,0.00031222138,9.5757656e-8,0.0006313885,0.21245192,0.0048104664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051916748,0.0000049718838,0.7701937,0.00006122883,0.000009087852,5.8279375e-7,0.015101151,0.000013475225,2.6318918e-7,0.00009464941,0.2141563,0.00031267724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99965864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6820529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037220498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028007813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97750247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390953963","doi":"10.1007/s11150-023-09688-0","title":"Estimating a model of inefficient cooperation and consumption in collective households","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inefficiency; Consumption (sociology); Liberian dollar; Economics; Microeconomics; Resource (disambiguation); Econometrics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.06411727310721312,"score_gpt":0.29163007155463794,"score_spread":0.22751279844742484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390953963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98149234,0.01599445,0.0005628482,0.00017346622,0.00018938108,0.00045742883,0.000077102224,0.0000115221765,0.0010414511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9356234,0.06284543,0.0013270957,0.00009320891,0.000015264952,0.000009124812,0.0000015170286,0.000010193584,0.0000747818],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918056,0.00008174371,0.00044296784,0.00013624236,0.0000618691,0.00009660586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994778,0.00010795502,0.00019470831,0.00015129107,0.000045436438,0.0000228021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009648816,0.00007293676,0.00028391063,0.00005737686,0.000055559143,0.000014751267,0.0001477631,0.0000523919,0.0000020717898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013913008,0.000061227496,0.000069468006,0.00020276361,0.00018060673,0.000101235164,0.000050086448,0.00007352515,3.0377376e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020999387,0.00024817395,0.034137312,0.017641982,0.00011082391,4.4128774e-7,0.021559648,0.7247819,0.0007732095,0.19413091,0.00050077046,0.0060938625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030674043,0.000049156468,0.0046217954,0.008615619,0.00011111185,0.000001110079,0.0005593928,0.9814709,0.00016036573,0.0035623778,0.00034572725,0.00019572591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020789092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003900294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.256689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011804908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003016992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24967848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391387053","doi":"10.1257/pol.20210075","title":"Labor Supply Responses to Income Taxation among Older Couples: Evidence from a Canadian Reform","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Economic Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Statistics Canada; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Public economics","score_opus":0.014330378648208606,"score_gpt":0.30267054110632435,"score_spread":0.2883401624581157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391387053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752043,0.0004001556,0.000051175877,0.016633732,0.001508175,0.00025330522,0.00068080623,0.00007942052,0.0051889643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98889273,0.0034556277,0.00037364016,0.0024976584,0.002893328,0.000026055206,0.000011347063,0.000053349555,0.0017962854],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758196,0.00020539085,0.00067338865,0.0005003882,0.00011129001,0.0009276123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974948,0.00039979097,0.0004446285,0.00034546715,0.000048890575,0.0012664179],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011525594,0.00026666836,0.0004317557,0.0009780561,0.0006254766,0.00090359745,0.00074211747,0.00011214168,0.0005420153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028446686,0.0002876737,0.00016819654,0.00032071644,0.0005389144,0.0011670808,0.00006672279,0.00037569806,0.0014227772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059887327,0.0000133007525,0.9107455,0.000009962509,0.00025773593,0.00005253169,0.04610442,0.0013757952,0.000042666034,0.018126316,0.0075445147,0.015667379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018717285,0.00009674545,0.9204913,0.00016682355,0.00003421852,0.000021532234,0.030905463,0.0025815577,0.000006186453,0.0019981987,0.04301703,0.00049376616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9494806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.860556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08892456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014097545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0108619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391715194","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_3203","title":"Wealth Taxes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.04602683533496865,"score_gpt":0.2959442898577912,"score_spread":0.24991745452282255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391715194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000036684076,0.00011152448,0.00011792966,0.00074512186,0.0015729772,0.00019393375,0.000095549134,0.0003491687,0.9967771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007253932,0.0042866524,0.00019137158,0.00059230044,0.0007362838,0.000003719157,0.00003316472,0.000049215847,0.9933819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986887,0.000021248172,0.00019339976,0.0002867527,0.00047487317,0.0003350465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993338,0.0000927648,0.000094435374,0.00022395235,0.000095941636,0.00015907902],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036767643,0.00017643403,0.0002307929,0.00010259488,0.00035436024,0.000063660926,0.00030587232,0.00042977,0.0013105815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035664747,0.0001678268,0.00012157847,0.000051882795,0.00020754764,0.000046776677,0.000061164676,0.00024258322,0.0024908665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.2704515e-7,0.0000026675764,0.00012318832,0.000010155511,0.00001925278,0.000007022475,0.0020008322,8.15047e-7,2.2461823e-7,0.9604485,0.036165345,0.001221347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046262772,0.00001350195,0.00031350003,0.00002234221,0.000017031103,1.5970232e-7,0.002476697,0.0000069659336,5.0163823e-8,0.19274011,0.8041404,0.00022299837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031448503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02858904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76797503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010115018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004412283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391726845","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_4076","title":"Teen Motherhood in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"History; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.026132222064183905,"score_gpt":0.24159968288426492,"score_spread":0.215467460820081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391726845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035787883,0.000051917053,0.00001111823,0.0004850732,0.0007617121,0.00017320292,0.000054698194,0.00006479179,0.9980396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012634159,0.00058332994,0.0000416966,0.00053084816,0.00018897456,0.0000036408735,0.000015367605,0.000040669704,0.9859613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881285,0.0000175214,0.0001888902,0.00023420485,0.00043886312,0.00030767126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995484,0.0000758947,0.000055043634,0.00017319468,0.00004395837,0.00010351674],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018655723,0.00015079157,0.00021280814,0.0000810009,0.00009767621,0.000024205036,0.00028729776,0.00021740196,0.00091492746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002105724,0.0001507205,0.000046720703,0.000063474225,0.000056847537,0.000028540315,0.000039163468,0.0002199395,0.00016848896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.662218e-7,0.0000030953395,0.006116145,0.000009721635,0.000024942436,0.000050847837,0.002309192,0.000016007705,2.1731925e-7,0.97506887,0.014408403,0.0019915863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022254795,0.000012898843,0.01362587,0.00006165082,0.000021829728,3.2057784e-7,0.017798338,0.000083737796,1.4427975e-7,0.12480847,0.8426662,0.00069796346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9923162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99987376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85026044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077329227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038782205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391789314","doi":"10.24908/cmj.v23i3.17319","title":"Women’s Deployment Experiences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Military Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Software deployment; Business; Computer science; Software engineering","score_opus":0.017766606673174926,"score_gpt":0.2594019394353283,"score_spread":0.24163533276215338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391789314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96646863,0.012333259,0.000079037265,0.0024492298,0.0037099328,0.00007973206,0.000017235525,0.00004986102,0.01481306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99350584,0.0014617763,0.00016132912,0.0010592291,0.0008892869,0.000020557633,0.000001784185,0.000013757722,0.0028864313],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843097,0.00011956579,0.00019027604,0.00018198065,0.00032870477,0.00074847665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839747,0.00003930753,0.00001234749,0.00010401201,0.00006524299,0.0013816074],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007774379,0.00010412587,0.00010402096,0.0002494064,0.000971023,0.00016738217,0.00031630462,0.00008229109,0.0019671423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063590225,0.00009823565,0.00007456715,0.00031599562,0.00021289675,0.00030408188,0.000009927916,0.00028073287,0.00011025394],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003531341,0.0000140596,0.010784618,0.0000140438415,0.000065290296,0.00087662187,0.90614986,0.000058208065,0.000015958723,0.008667526,0.060036663,0.013313591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054977467,0.000036618698,0.004438665,0.00002495553,0.000006010496,0.000043548123,0.48653406,0.00019593137,7.6326654e-7,0.0031027875,0.50541073,0.00015097823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13539848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5475921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44537404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017115735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035229614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392532992","doi":"10.70675/11b48b7fz2ecez42afz926dzd768f52a6591","title":"Analyse économique des comportements en matière de protection sociale","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Behavioral economics; Positive economics; Economics; Data science; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.06063727770899497,"score_gpt":0.31107941275979195,"score_spread":0.250442135050797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392532992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8790302,0.00006347982,0.029606408,0.0003838469,0.0005635489,0.0006269522,0.000015892456,0.00014791444,0.08956175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744034,0.0005486348,0.0100866845,0.0001893026,0.0005882905,0.0001309274,0.00007726886,0.000021146947,0.013954388],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832636,0.00046768272,0.00030694596,0.0003770162,0.00017329602,0.0003487084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991976,0.000036464855,0.0001679982,0.0002355423,0.00023957672,0.00012279325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095217384,0.00018109808,0.0002931269,0.00008837624,0.00047929212,0.00032844508,0.00031571015,0.0005033049,0.00058586174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012162483,0.00019841721,0.00017827688,0.00018707917,0.0001713873,0.00013650786,0.00025601313,0.00039835344,0.000019465964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022125174,0.00070096704,0.7360128,0.0007799213,0.0011934901,0.000042117088,0.20232148,0.0032364777,0.0010134178,0.023448532,0.0014652946,0.02976335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007851193,0.00005355531,0.5391159,0.00029814473,0.00036345323,0.0000028750726,0.29082137,0.009076125,0.0002697064,0.14776884,0.009884719,0.0015602097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08762052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13598803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19689694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001155787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014924516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9184551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392736454","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2403.05573","title":"Beyond Predictive Algorithms in Child Welfare","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Welfare; Computer science; Algorithm; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Market economy","score_opus":0.03384062802075889,"score_gpt":0.2056683634111221,"score_spread":0.17182773539036322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392736454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5988558,0.0005227328,0.0024746766,0.0009829581,0.0033543564,0.0007715676,0.00038774926,0.0004013909,0.39224878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936044,0.0011054162,0.00007781945,0.000067895555,0.00033318726,0.000002092781,0.000057909503,0.000032029602,0.0047192294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784225,0.00022591585,0.00020130278,0.0010227028,0.00017825757,0.00052958773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990121,0.000052868134,0.00011505411,0.00046656316,0.00013823982,0.00021517184],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041434902,0.00030879132,0.0003412831,0.00040179864,0.00047284894,0.00011054047,0.0008243232,0.0006428804,0.00011080734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000475406,0.00037710674,0.0002186385,0.0009889114,0.00036067906,0.00013747497,0.0009999697,0.0012781945,0.00010300484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044566037,0.0002172867,0.040337555,0.00018106798,0.00023853144,0.0013674321,0.024587812,0.06915796,7.985869e-7,0.8628062,0.00050205056,0.0005587138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001416252,0.0001366888,0.08658713,0.00061548175,0.00055861013,0.0000052147493,0.10639552,0.15859087,0.0000033398524,0.6257006,0.017889634,0.0021006675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050991923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007871706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39474863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069910823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035309818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392757101","doi":"10.1002/hec.4822","title":"The optimal design of assisted reproductive technologies policies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fecundity; Economics; Utilitarianism; Egalitarianism; Fertility; Wage; Incentive; Assisted reproductive technology; Welfare; Public economics; Microeconomics; Labour economics; Demography; Biology; Population; Infertility; Market economy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07048388330347885,"score_gpt":0.3389968115259824,"score_spread":0.2685129282225035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392757101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7892945,0.03319842,0.013785585,0.13657549,0.0060527995,0.0021997187,0.00014596249,0.001596573,0.01715097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96003383,0.032387044,0.005635218,0.00028022466,0.00025682352,0.00003980619,0.000003500234,0.000022531709,0.001341025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989709,0.00011485271,0.00028503602,0.0002318414,0.00006032541,0.0003369959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991991,0.00032168516,0.00010981494,0.0002757514,0.000051757903,0.000041902436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00144118,0.00007814186,0.00015581977,0.000069453854,0.00055951846,0.00009498955,0.0002686773,0.00008953921,0.000002695571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020792015,0.000063159074,0.00004430878,0.0002157598,0.0005021638,0.000103648774,0.000047113674,0.00013613896,0.000012032686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002488941,0.000040404528,0.002026636,0.000090741494,0.00008368512,0.0000011770128,0.045961164,0.0031860778,0.00001633901,0.85863125,0.006521475,0.08341616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002636129,0.00037529942,0.021269,0.00009105388,0.000030421368,0.000008905608,0.37754005,0.018431103,0.000120397526,0.060743973,0.52062273,0.00050347886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014309586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085659296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79788727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027645938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011114163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43034202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392972973","doi":"10.26443/mjgh.v9i1.1322","title":"Black Mothers in America","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Journal of Global Health","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Childbirth; Psychological intervention; Socioeconomic status; Racism; Health equity; Inequality; Health care; Poverty; Infant mortality; Political science; Demographic economics; Psychology; Medicine; Economic growth; Environmental health; Nursing; Economics; Pregnancy; Population","score_opus":0.03725216571542695,"score_gpt":0.3491080780963987,"score_spread":0.31185591238097177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392972973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85777503,0.0011061769,0.0011277632,0.09231733,0.0008602613,0.0002503252,0.00010980995,0.0000380604,0.046415213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761732,0.0024231449,0.0013287616,0.019836321,0.00020979499,1.9475993e-7,4.1598196e-7,0.000005779415,0.00002238165],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851674,0.00023263755,0.00039985712,0.00010233012,0.0003954516,0.0003529586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999062,0.000026841484,0.00030056626,0.000054105174,0.000095569565,0.0004608925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046826634,0.00007699461,0.00025084964,0.000025056426,0.00017408491,0.0000165297,0.00026044116,0.000050326405,0.000027411435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001021912,0.00007164855,0.0000753085,0.0006010478,0.00011692798,0.00011409361,0.000018245591,0.00018105973,0.000023572395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005943659,0.0007428799,0.47580293,0.00019735278,0.00014523978,0.0003476657,0.10544087,0.006663553,0.000026754617,0.12349561,0.067215525,0.21932727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015770509,0.0012754016,0.15844919,0.00008774238,0.000013231174,0.0000127984995,0.08848931,0.0007315261,5.672656e-7,0.0051219044,0.7439565,0.00028477376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001777601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015217083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.676741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068887917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058988493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2921743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393244988","doi":"10.1257/app.20210816","title":"The Impact of Cash Transfers to Poor Mothers on Family Structure and Maternal Well-Being","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Applied Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; University of Toronto; Queen's University; California Center for Population Research, University of California, Los Angeles; University of Minnesota; Princeton University; Carnegie Mellon University; National Institutes of Health; Yale University","keywords":"Cash transfers; Demographic economics; Poverty; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0059699409717618125,"score_gpt":0.24907891360148351,"score_spread":0.2431089726297217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393244988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98407596,0.000053203836,0.00015142083,0.00066451274,0.00056602305,0.0002007799,0.000089274356,0.000023893348,0.014174948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99646366,0.0023569204,0.00020656781,0.0004367057,0.00038146318,0.0000040224877,0.000001286206,0.000040258346,0.000109109555],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987179,0.000045316534,0.00042651003,0.00028048208,0.0000626189,0.00046718316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919164,0.00018598599,0.00016201539,0.00015016456,0.000014858057,0.00029534308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004949738,0.00021070428,0.00033183704,0.00014780211,0.00043570375,0.00045488903,0.00037154843,0.00006296263,0.000050540362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000050138397,0.00016617843,0.00016354451,0.00009119184,0.00046395315,0.00013029395,0.000026655378,0.00029923508,0.00004060406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065938354,0.000048322054,0.046428338,0.000032431304,0.0018706423,0.000014975686,0.06543155,0.19905227,0.002097223,0.24497364,0.002895142,0.43649608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029318202,0.0032227961,0.48142287,0.00016555033,0.00036028962,0.00026980607,0.287489,0.024274345,0.0008208498,0.15283187,0.042920813,0.0032899776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002722123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076581794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43499455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073879084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004095303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.677656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393434837","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4178899/v1","title":"Covariate Shocks, Women’s Bargaining Power, and Household Vulnerability","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Covariate; Vulnerability (computing); Bargaining power; Economics; Power (physics); Demographic economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.10505571620280302,"score_gpt":0.40443660834071204,"score_spread":0.299380892137909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393434837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9390904,0.003500434,0.00009620644,0.001444948,0.0011472529,0.0011375607,0.0005254288,0.00037776682,0.052680034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932418,0.0025970717,0.00021490525,0.0000838323,0.0005078691,0.00029869474,0.000037717535,0.00006956547,0.0029485542],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99303216,0.0018310137,0.00040729492,0.0011957963,0.001975751,0.0015579573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709636,0.00077429495,0.00007060131,0.00084326946,0.0005558694,0.00065960403],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0115303,0.00032802884,0.00048262172,0.00045138746,0.0011959312,0.0011017089,0.0007879475,0.00075742713,0.00025965497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015908036,0.00032384036,0.00014329098,0.0007746554,0.00093675754,0.00010293052,0.002764396,0.0035942316,0.00007066501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014687688,0.00047816077,0.11654265,0.0034981326,0.0004545594,0.00035009286,0.47129872,0.0008806607,0.00013345815,0.3906917,0.010181992,0.0053429967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059065165,0.00031512827,0.121948935,0.0009659668,0.0000381709,0.000002938069,0.22198685,0.0015564355,0.0000066014177,0.61545545,0.035931766,0.0012011204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063724294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015392266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24931188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015620646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002444799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394598537","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4786066","title":"The Gender Division of Work Across Countries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Work (physics); Division of labour; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Mathematics; Arithmetic; Mechanical engineering; Law","score_opus":0.012989618601124586,"score_gpt":0.3027791001905575,"score_spread":0.2897894815894329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394598537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92615724,0.053493753,0.009467933,0.0030166197,0.0020996253,0.00013582065,0.0000075589987,0.00006801987,0.0055534034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95839345,0.036982015,0.000016967075,0.000043975237,0.00036148302,0.0000016538752,7.340262e-7,0.000012589043,0.004187099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972459,0.00013899793,0.00022162597,0.00012398337,0.0005079996,0.0017614756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999413,0.00021343461,0.00007140074,0.000114773226,0.00012567463,0.00006171327],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041451366,0.00009023072,0.00010397515,0.00003117373,0.00130099,0.00030881166,0.00037599055,0.000084130814,0.000015511943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008313954,0.0000594705,0.00011194434,0.00037921584,0.00029984815,0.00016589365,0.00003696955,0.0009525283,0.000025945203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015886142,0.000014518618,0.019779494,0.000007512226,0.00013117162,0.0000027252654,0.022552092,0.000038872,0.000015065312,0.9416046,0.0006718764,0.01516616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022886372,0.00010476506,0.019129675,0.00005240013,0.000041432522,0.00002247814,0.15321133,0.00010317146,0.0000073885017,0.6468757,0.18000752,0.000215293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015278527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032828732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29472893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053257233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027586806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394703148","doi":"10.25071/p9z0cs30","title":"Child care in Canada and the United States","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada Watch","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.005111632846693182,"score_gpt":0.1984588802322406,"score_spread":0.1933472473855474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394703148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97025764,0.00046238813,3.6761665e-7,0.014813637,0.00016376354,0.000121611505,0.00005321721,0.0000061244223,0.014121233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951422,0.00083876366,0.0000043863006,0.0028626136,0.00003964177,0.0000046314867,0.000035479065,0.0000052924897,0.001066994],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916226,0.00010242963,0.0000979488,0.00011138472,0.0002551671,0.00027081248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996529,0.00007965199,0.000015690126,0.00010440369,0.000043969212,0.00010337023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011146174,0.00006771269,0.00009460994,0.000011414081,0.00031973998,0.000025659627,0.00015859179,0.00002582013,0.00009373782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019782277,0.00005111977,0.000008099113,0.0003008024,0.00011150611,0.000024975308,0.000009834817,0.00011197258,3.8376942e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062396364,0.00001125709,0.68512046,0.000034682987,0.00004177471,0.00012570404,0.1513407,0.0063354657,3.7322218e-7,0.0039053855,0.13987973,0.013142066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050885684,0.000003399632,0.09103465,0.000008957922,0.0000062111,7.44875e-7,0.14362876,0.00045493065,8.241814e-7,0.00024931628,0.7639741,0.0001292843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6240943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072078925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034175392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6062568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394755442","doi":"10.1177/23210222241237030","title":"The Complexity of Female Empowerment in India","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Microeconomics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Empowerment; Agency (philosophy); Salience (neuroscience); Women's empowerment; Context (archaeology); Political science; Politics; Economic growth; Development economics; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Geography; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.06781882116765776,"score_gpt":0.35383612132702874,"score_spread":0.286017300159371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394755442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9694739,0.008444285,0.0000051580905,0.0006591751,0.0016047892,0.0002097889,0.00002326412,0.000015517631,0.019564118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858751,0.013321311,0.00020108625,0.0000841642,0.00007067465,0.000014664236,0.0000016773919,0.0000073659166,0.00042393655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990921,0.00008043386,0.00031830955,0.00017790696,0.00005961988,0.0002716193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995345,0.00023292501,0.000048542115,0.00013427116,0.00002845315,0.000021325717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008071295,0.00008492077,0.00019302515,0.00007863677,0.00018846767,0.0000398237,0.00024420547,0.00004894514,0.000007195825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006270037,0.00007190841,0.000048835158,0.00019908868,0.0015161705,0.00006202483,0.00012283643,0.00013800655,0.000014820048],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017348168,0.00007553909,0.28685364,0.00011735846,0.00014184283,0.000014844064,0.2614343,0.00009313777,0.0000793597,0.44617337,0.001858125,0.0031411306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003829362,0.000041027495,0.30759165,0.00012218469,0.000013694575,8.8703905e-7,0.5374868,0.000230913,0.000038978644,0.077533096,0.07628167,0.00027619462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005810182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018131623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36864027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040799112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015738254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394786553","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/vqzta","title":"Bargaining between the sexes: outside options and leisure time in hunter-gatherer households","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Leverhulme Trust; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Economics; Labour economics; Welfare; Leverage (statistics); Subsistence agriculture; Social capital; Population; Division of labour; Demographic economics; Sociology; Market economy; Geography","score_opus":0.040089130182272906,"score_gpt":0.3031017308987125,"score_spread":0.2630126007164396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394786553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80982393,0.0011270192,0.00034129343,0.0025642507,0.0005070572,0.00056813296,0.00012058112,0.0002815352,0.18466619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839878,0.00063971657,0.000529889,0.00019111796,0.0005553501,0.000041087747,0.000027217164,0.00004283125,0.013984967],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981254,0.00028267907,0.0003236955,0.00051432644,0.00034408615,0.000409853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991372,0.00026192673,0.00007418588,0.00037018512,0.000044563283,0.00011188898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013302574,0.0002499122,0.00036187624,0.00010876005,0.00032763332,0.0004331931,0.00049821817,0.00049592345,0.00010650214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051320007,0.00018613508,0.000114414055,0.00026217412,0.00028905043,0.00006484701,0.0008078095,0.0009949086,0.00009575466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034800457,0.00005036683,0.8127587,0.00009300674,0.00024535586,0.00002135216,0.13264629,0.0012350783,0.000019113884,0.04633245,0.0032468548,0.0033479456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005219715,0.0000588615,0.58528143,0.00066271226,0.0004095396,0.000002695158,0.13345398,0.005019482,0.000004203185,0.24738653,0.025656968,0.0015416468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067646313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069582146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2274773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013183546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037812418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394863737","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4784734","title":"One Cohort at a Time: A New Perspective on the Declining Gender Pay Gap","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Perspective (graphical); Cohort; Internet privacy; Demographic economics; Computer science; Business; Political science; World Wide Web; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.028976059834805282,"score_gpt":0.30617738109395926,"score_spread":0.277201321259154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394863737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65414006,0.018967647,0.008614532,0.038439874,0.002035738,0.0008146514,0.000010598378,0.00035104912,0.27662584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471468,0.008019952,0.000057002482,0.00063895836,0.0015691677,0.00000575265,0.0000017367518,0.000033997312,0.04252666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965918,0.0002950896,0.0002180489,0.00030322032,0.0006663308,0.0019254946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991604,0.00030300755,0.00007769372,0.00016592341,0.00012325273,0.00016973537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034342855,0.00015887766,0.00017274222,0.000098207165,0.0010888159,0.0002569585,0.00039007785,0.00012271269,0.0003771707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002268291,0.00010506261,0.00018634136,0.00043628024,0.00014096557,0.00014491263,0.00004449493,0.0020689187,0.00048462715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027364265,0.000037847974,0.004048874,0.0000018150671,0.00044539198,0.000008474451,0.022821832,0.000033145985,0.00008037927,0.967225,0.0024473849,0.0028224925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030691962,0.00022667827,0.0063194544,0.000045240806,0.00016592817,0.00007063485,0.08191126,0.0005659642,0.000005428983,0.89302343,0.017057398,0.00030167677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009336672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005419133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2930067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004363001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072622905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394964037","doi":"10.25071/renwbj37","title":"Women in Latin America","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada Watch","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Political science","score_opus":0.013943707809645075,"score_gpt":0.24532376851606144,"score_spread":0.23138006070641637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394964037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9119557,0.00028030475,0.000034780838,0.014720605,0.0010637754,0.00008503656,0.000021300739,0.000052572763,0.07178591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98425055,0.00009264898,0.000049361133,0.000617451,0.00011509812,0.00001073589,0.000003537384,0.0000070998512,0.014853523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991382,0.000043012773,0.00008669481,0.00013268253,0.00022011095,0.00037933237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970937,0.000057401656,0.000008713024,0.000077385885,0.000017809161,0.00012933614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001800095,0.000051882067,0.000079794474,0.000021987798,0.000083786785,0.00004553071,0.00012466717,0.0000350932,0.00017067527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044692173,0.000051383882,0.000012286814,0.00044512664,0.00005290035,0.000044915312,0.00001397729,0.00009848638,0.000013433399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047020217,0.00002807427,0.14649872,0.00006263775,0.000034965266,0.00035931976,0.18202364,0.00024209799,0.00009466859,0.01234462,0.62693185,0.0313747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000357435,0.000004952394,0.021848572,0.000007959875,0.0000013125654,1.2913354e-7,0.034341723,0.00039339997,0.0000011298807,0.0015216271,0.941757,0.0000864335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9194108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9791555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31482518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008739926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018024369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31974456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395672216","doi":"10.1111/caje.12704","title":"Free, full‐day programming for four‐year‐old children in Nova Scotia and women's labour market outcomes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Child care; Demographic economics; Medicine; Economics; Labour economics; Political science; Demography; Geography; Nursing; Sociology","score_opus":0.053739303744097376,"score_gpt":0.21115160918699846,"score_spread":0.15741230544290108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395672216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912663,0.00038175043,0.00006690951,0.004160068,0.0022328217,0.0005580881,0.0005997522,0.000013458189,0.00072086265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951778,0.00016901265,0.0012427745,0.00063259166,0.0007117469,0.000021110049,0.000009103114,0.000058892034,0.0019769683],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761397,0.00010301649,0.0006931257,0.00039984556,0.0000070838823,0.0011829706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973474,0.00032570888,0.00024008485,0.00026352223,0.00013174624,0.0016914968],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023175585,0.00026882178,0.00057313195,0.0008457581,0.00022529453,0.0005313838,0.00060282386,0.00025045246,0.00022361863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005669508,0.00031551064,0.00017151849,0.00023527998,0.00025552537,0.00053372356,0.000027088101,0.00038730787,0.0000050474273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032003267,0.000012017004,0.51050866,0.00008088616,0.00023241602,0.00011447517,0.015005121,0.0002547408,0.0000014739517,0.4668605,0.001219255,0.00567847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032513605,0.0006950995,0.48322475,0.0004361029,0.00012834008,0.00031190267,0.028825263,0.0016929804,0.0000024083067,0.36895645,0.11081093,0.001664411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35215354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6449646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027801036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034982301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395680024","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4805539","title":"Demography, Human Capital Investment, and Lifetime Earnings for Women and Men","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Investment (military); Human capital; Demographic economics; Economics; Capital (architecture); Demography; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science; History; Finance; Economic growth; Ancient history","score_opus":0.007463287144894197,"score_gpt":0.2607663570000787,"score_spread":0.2533030698551845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395680024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855554,0.008157877,0.00048897805,0.0006792817,0.00013186179,0.00017778714,0.0000052254236,0.000052336938,0.004751266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843279,0.007921766,0.00007379741,0.00012638528,0.00035609378,0.000015654077,0.0000025566692,0.000019579466,0.0071562463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782926,0.00007988063,0.0001534167,0.0002073144,0.00018938782,0.0015407692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960095,0.00006223581,0.00004952706,0.00005236803,0.0000436833,0.00019123856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019081302,0.00011680363,0.00013313243,0.00013823678,0.00080075033,0.00028252855,0.0001252209,0.000086508306,0.000011240082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036458052,0.000107134605,0.000056051333,0.00017299384,0.0002048343,0.00021922083,0.00002695292,0.00063174445,0.0000022725017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010611742,0.000023081713,0.03365136,0.00002443963,0.00024141696,0.0000029122405,0.049734194,0.0000012043412,0.0003489248,0.91203934,0.00031692508,0.0036055886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042254623,0.0004262647,0.010900776,0.000015776024,0.000036727033,0.00004197105,0.069650054,0.00009186845,0.0000015293884,0.8999919,0.018225804,0.00019476365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002314238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014795067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022750583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003990008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097104936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6158805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396530320","doi":"10.61838/kman.jprfc.1.2.5","title":"Improving Family Functioning with Social Skills Training: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychosociological Research in Family and Culture","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Training (meteorology); Social skills; Developmental psychology; Applied psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.21880323426212187,"score_gpt":0.4496914897710686,"score_spread":0.23088825550894673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396530320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994992,0.0020408565,0.00012746951,0.00090977974,0.00037729312,0.0003549245,0.000007804926,0.000036799294,0.0011530368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967057,0.0015188217,0.0003975428,0.0001998494,0.00086265185,0.000025731668,0.0000027590793,0.000012344957,0.0002745617],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953772,0.001576168,0.00047349988,0.00040632358,0.0014362589,0.00073056587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806905,0.0009216827,0.00020826943,0.00010934037,0.0004231854,0.00026846642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057493565,0.00018561263,0.00042593127,0.00021157977,0.0011805514,0.00023467363,0.00047677904,0.000351182,0.00001983243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077697635,0.0001226907,0.00010923104,0.0011537663,0.0007712874,0.00040409408,0.00009222025,0.0015941173,0.000009552187],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076441676,0.0023931682,0.29214054,0.000017439628,0.00015848897,0.00040925917,0.6792993,0.000035216613,0.013391169,0.0009075726,0.004955986,0.005527456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009353268,0.0026436446,0.39986962,0.000109304216,0.000010729161,0.0000019242518,0.5933009,0.000032626864,0.0000019495526,0.0022419381,0.00071942474,0.00013262461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008409558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025432842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10772908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021552302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003636613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9079966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396530555","doi":"10.22215/etd/2023-15901","title":"Capitalism and Patriarchy are Kicking My Butt: A Feminist Political Economy Analysis of Women’s Freedom and Domestic Labour","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Capitalism; Politics; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014411689416478385,"score_gpt":0.29774185844546774,"score_spread":0.28333016902898933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396530555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797798,0.00023559305,0.000021942336,0.00015785288,0.00035777394,0.0002129562,0.0002842913,0.000063238454,0.018886583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940704,0.0002454263,0.0000982473,0.00013762814,0.00017154538,0.000039924078,0.00029811825,0.000028265687,0.0049104393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997982,0.00012574294,0.0004404719,0.0004744627,0.00030101335,0.0006762562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984607,0.0004739814,0.00025468896,0.00019956267,0.00020454111,0.00040648866],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068369,0.00024662746,0.00078079826,0.0006047697,0.00032514296,0.00019545692,0.00020362514,0.00038997162,0.0000872844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003307376,0.00024747464,0.00014006403,0.00082425395,0.00032734004,0.0000810713,0.000046252728,0.00020678577,0.000004002128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021120886,0.000050524137,0.23355572,0.0003686454,0.0011611524,0.000030865656,0.113397986,0.000009959424,0.0000051968905,0.65111035,0.00006404221,0.00022444608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023975503,0.000028731121,0.42280746,0.000036032732,0.00066755485,5.397669e-7,0.55451334,0.00030277512,4.937214e-7,0.020651555,0.00045967422,0.00029211355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020417321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044763543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6304588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029361492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038647276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396582010","doi":"10.51989/nul.2024.1.19","title":"GENDER PARITY POLICY IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE SYSTEM IN NORTH AMERICA","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Ukrainian Law","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parity (physics); Public service; Political science; Business; Public administration; Physics","score_opus":0.04090750957353752,"score_gpt":0.3006321092673021,"score_spread":0.2597245996937646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396582010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5838872,0.00072290626,0.00006194515,0.028659074,0.00080491736,0.00050650677,0.000047219506,0.000263158,0.38504708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917565,0.00008922052,0.00009687859,0.0070987116,0.0006716474,0.000019104382,0.000014817408,0.000015593363,0.00023755762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809694,0.00038921577,0.0002409011,0.00030169915,0.0004148802,0.0005563401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931777,0.00015996963,0.000035161655,0.00028923474,0.000040610783,0.00015723417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068636256,0.00013529872,0.00017083276,0.00015479051,0.00021788263,0.00036585753,0.0005752982,0.00012048907,0.000028438651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058433816,0.000108819804,0.00005663233,0.0028367674,0.00014953097,0.0002527121,0.000050289083,0.0003139199,0.00016164214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023998325,0.000038768903,0.017360019,0.00008598846,0.000012433649,0.000056910947,0.39123142,0.000030060879,0.0000012431923,0.5875072,0.00045069304,0.0032228704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018427461,0.000012110049,0.066744454,0.000024389146,0.000007064316,0.000003483245,0.061535407,0.0009301868,4.2930665e-8,0.0010713792,0.86931455,0.000172663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.095037475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5155327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8688639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003039042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010311226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91098875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396625434","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae012","title":"<i>Managing Federalism through Pandemic</i>, by Kathy L. Brock and Geoffrey Hale","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Federalism; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Law and economics; Economic history; Economics; Medicine; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02347726187068172,"score_gpt":0.2848828852118721,"score_spread":0.2614056233411904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396625434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8378923,0.043172505,0.0073610363,0.06688395,0.005259605,0.00040957626,0.00004772262,0.00023088805,0.0387424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669595,0.019034013,0.00035984867,0.004280278,0.0011743639,0.0000035168118,0.0000057849106,0.000041421157,0.0081413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974704,0.0004122887,0.0005339996,0.00022154006,0.00076625816,0.0005955126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867827,0.00039798935,0.00024227174,0.00018883811,0.00026732826,0.00022528997],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017046941,0.0002280156,0.00032083664,0.00011240634,0.0014303913,0.0018614391,0.00060774095,0.0001552166,0.000035163594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001603258,0.0001593358,0.00016233284,0.00039767197,0.00029810154,0.0014461341,0.00011290888,0.0006719736,0.000011246866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074252835,0.00015067618,0.01464001,0.00014627846,0.0005964138,0.00011138061,0.14994802,0.0001280262,0.0019913,0.05683027,0.76069283,0.014690537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007816777,0.00011842254,0.0029943497,0.00017350078,0.0002120477,0.00041253725,0.049880087,0.0005193255,0.00003076766,0.09011052,0.85424745,0.0005192915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032085849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011671687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12906715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014845544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002982313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396627542","doi":"10.2307/jj.14443769.17","title":"Feminist Perspectives on Young Mothers and Young Mothering:","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Demeter Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03560536811798322,"score_gpt":0.2734083322188437,"score_spread":0.2378029641008605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396627542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011502472,0.0019980439,0.00006529392,0.00003530755,0.0011475305,0.0004475764,0.00012144775,0.00021723837,0.9948173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08165126,0.000738449,0.00017691783,0.00014598071,0.00058994995,0.000028343233,0.000004811012,0.00013860904,0.91652566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980355,0.000045570483,0.00026486203,0.00073042634,0.0005137107,0.000409935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991892,0.00007118428,0.00012441576,0.0003744335,0.000067215755,0.00017355308],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003019951,0.00042628983,0.00037053128,0.00014933338,0.00034002116,0.00037834025,0.00035685644,0.00047069462,0.000049874296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018915456,0.00041558006,0.00018368824,0.000011009736,0.00062333257,0.00003949592,0.00012274693,0.0005078141,0.000032421616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013971583,0.000008202792,0.00011568432,0.000054554457,0.00023142823,0.0000338389,0.12727824,0.0000013661769,0.000014485655,0.87066424,0.00045605813,0.0011279355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029134823,0.00013973778,0.00014712925,0.00031481707,0.00031456628,0.000011061916,0.026416238,0.00012827531,0.000009350288,0.043492366,0.92769307,0.0010420454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001038574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007293134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92723703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001537395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000818884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396731091","doi":"10.1111/caje.12710","title":"Measuring physicians' response to incentives: Labour supply, multitasking and earnings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval; University of Toronto; Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Human multitasking; Incentive; Earnings; Economics; Substitution effect; Substitution (logic); Labour economics; Function (biology); Supply; Labour supply; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Accounting; Computer science","score_opus":0.08476266071378698,"score_gpt":0.2131620676144866,"score_spread":0.12839940690069962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396731091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991485,0.00056402537,0.00013060997,0.0046835733,0.002000023,0.00022019456,0.00015811136,0.000016343349,0.0007421396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963481,0.00027722394,0.0005794045,0.0006632743,0.00078248396,0.000007128878,0.0000028434501,0.0000478891,0.0012916856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809986,0.00020922173,0.0004974822,0.00035806774,0.00000707926,0.0008282881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973023,0.00032405747,0.00018742606,0.00018168907,0.00020069063,0.001803848],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020298618,0.00021508517,0.00039135056,0.0008252898,0.00047614815,0.0004885814,0.0004277969,0.00015748543,0.00007832441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050806015,0.00027674175,0.00013692211,0.00026996003,0.00023041834,0.0006133275,0.000026104006,0.000390734,0.000022903892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002594874,0.00001902172,0.15357243,0.0001533922,0.0004292296,0.00088171894,0.26712778,0.005627176,0.00045429743,0.5482031,0.0011247916,0.022147551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012057386,0.00062138756,0.2258547,0.0015494862,0.00014831491,0.00027745706,0.10849609,0.0034246957,0.00009626165,0.0643847,0.59219694,0.0017442347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25615314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9785704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72241724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024949766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036702051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396777269","doi":"10.1017/9781800108868.013","title":"Women, Work, Earnings and Family","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economics; Engineering; Accounting; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.018831180882802976,"score_gpt":0.26481579586058746,"score_spread":0.24598461497778448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396777269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027613011,0.0029439447,0.00006668958,0.00020211446,0.001028658,0.00014512229,0.00001068462,0.00044037044,0.9924011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025529913,0.002493211,0.00032377837,0.000508528,0.0005057532,0.000014762055,0.00000358681,0.00021457828,0.9933828],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989194,0.00005191294,0.00009639449,0.0003157464,0.00025760487,0.00035892578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963135,0.000023181527,0.000044653898,0.00013380389,0.000017302596,0.00014971015],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028213905,0.00016183805,0.00019643591,0.00014223711,0.00008418686,0.00014507155,0.00016054689,0.00035123347,0.0021809833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026725158,0.0001427585,0.000037319376,0.00029745515,0.00021653443,0.000023921819,0.00006116705,0.00021763923,0.0011100624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.2669524e-7,0.000007381727,0.0023384055,0.000035682042,0.000040766394,0.0000069915236,0.015128598,7.003684e-8,0.0000011009998,0.0155192595,0.9653536,0.0015671842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047964553,0.00000913959,0.0015258366,0.00005490392,0.000012437976,1.278023e-7,0.020637989,0.0000012969776,1.0547184e-8,0.0013935503,0.9761252,0.00019153487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027301484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012950408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0141257085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006681263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107307525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397013053","doi":"10.4324/9781003101895-13","title":"Indian Women","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.031154191025565305,"score_gpt":0.2674005984490362,"score_spread":0.2362464074234709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397013053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005990052,0.000027706794,0.000014209355,0.00024853853,0.0009731845,0.00016263247,0.000040786665,0.0003042947,0.99762964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036585333,0.00081242964,0.000054330307,0.00052492163,0.00054250687,0.000008841066,0.000025436415,0.000048168127,0.9943248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873793,0.000015860338,0.00015973263,0.00025868206,0.00041793202,0.00040986956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993891,0.00006076632,0.00006698956,0.00021022533,0.00006752714,0.00020536476],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036291432,0.00016431589,0.00020829726,0.0001340907,0.00027633322,0.00007180927,0.00031578625,0.0004675262,0.002444744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028952387,0.00016277104,0.000082229526,0.000060221257,0.00017290411,0.00004812191,0.000063757994,0.00023412467,0.0030739235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.7741953e-7,0.0000028373158,0.00012753018,0.000008653427,0.000031908992,0.00002274705,0.027633533,4.777038e-7,1.8909243e-7,0.9635029,0.0064363847,0.0022320512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057829155,0.000015423651,0.0004098419,0.000014422761,0.000007458909,1.9794655e-7,0.016365191,0.000001368758,3.452612e-8,0.268674,0.7141952,0.00025903736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006999652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008806239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70775884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002302304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003565147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99846715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398152009","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4834635","title":"Childcare Regulation and the Fertility Gap","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Business; Economics; Political science; Demographic economics; Medicine; Environmental health; Population","score_opus":0.011086022043415321,"score_gpt":0.2673097893101038,"score_spread":0.2562237672666885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398152009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93564385,0.028265642,0.0055818674,0.010425941,0.00078312715,0.00021828858,0.0000027375456,0.000086681765,0.018991847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98864394,0.008258457,0.000014579755,0.00009367743,0.0003816185,0.000002062446,0.0000014226927,0.000007633064,0.0025966102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836075,0.00023510856,0.00013181435,0.00012761429,0.00025789856,0.00088680635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969095,0.00008341926,0.000033294113,0.00008334398,0.00005661668,0.000052401625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031663014,0.00007010331,0.0000840602,0.00003872863,0.00073145743,0.00022322651,0.00014820429,0.00006315941,0.00002032742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083831226,0.000045862165,0.0000683856,0.00020067058,0.00022959533,0.0001681261,0.000017431386,0.00084854907,0.000008847026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002181122,0.000005638498,0.004083795,0.0000035326054,0.00004409227,6.1438044e-7,0.0085967425,0.0000084278645,0.000008001092,0.97257215,0.00006170449,0.014593469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029927213,0.000025414838,0.042664453,0.00001270228,0.00003508527,0.00002678481,0.023943268,0.00083130604,6.340034e-7,0.9270306,0.005052825,0.000077630946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004492177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006766068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05300007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042452945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014260092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5625853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398755781","doi":"10.1257/pandp.20241105","title":"The Impact of Family Tax Benefits on Children’s Health and Educational Outcomes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AEA Papers and Proceedings","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Public economics; Business; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.017913572550079443,"score_gpt":0.3141952864463582,"score_spread":0.2962817138962788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398755781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9770271,0.005712967,1.7299837e-7,0.0056814672,0.00014284663,0.00014820212,0.000036917863,0.000018821353,0.011231484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99256194,0.0060598394,0.000025759775,0.0003689093,0.00010063853,0.000005917426,0.000004129518,0.0000071520885,0.0008657433],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993383,0.000008353377,0.00011547331,0.00016198732,0.00017762098,0.00019822981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996342,0.000117495416,0.00004261246,0.00003192037,0.000047233367,0.0001265398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028234636,0.00008832432,0.0001086398,0.00003745267,0.0005300027,0.00015264981,0.000081267266,0.000045345278,0.000006033938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059622165,0.000053905023,0.000047864207,0.00014369292,0.00016437,0.00008600993,0.000016892795,0.0000844231,0.000001220999],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008797992,0.000025186326,0.7118331,0.000025395448,0.00006805664,6.3301925e-8,0.035294134,0.000002155827,0.000035951813,0.21970668,0.0058419006,0.027158583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077702374,0.00012338554,0.98807335,0.000036093203,0.000005878384,0.0000011735107,0.007875219,0.000024138633,6.077816e-7,0.0022219757,0.0014895751,0.00007090021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025034035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013257557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27624026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046562025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023330169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40764058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398778836","doi":"10.1515/9780776637990-007","title":"4 A Single Mother Returns to Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.03329039491273854,"score_gpt":0.21615816610855482,"score_spread":0.18286777119581626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398778836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048822645,0.000024777728,0.000057273533,0.00012466211,0.00043871845,0.0002761848,0.00028854277,0.0000812133,0.9982204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01306426,0.000034117136,0.00020652992,0.00013409255,0.00009329898,1.3080805e-7,0.0000105921845,0.000034216682,0.9864228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998765,0.000034484285,0.00012857773,0.00029223124,0.0004985516,0.00028117525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991093,0.00006700348,0.00014692213,0.0002905512,0.00017798472,0.0002082367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013320785,0.0001749484,0.00027485107,0.00010029765,0.00026544472,0.000018489662,0.0005597716,0.00027700086,0.00009012358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019490346,0.00022925668,0.00010098194,0.000015943366,0.00021526126,0.000022027994,0.00014379622,0.00018421965,0.000012789523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017109523,0.000013008749,0.00010061017,0.00005961686,0.00017480683,0.00015610956,0.029630814,0.000040226732,0.000027352582,0.915606,0.05243331,0.0017410134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012346604,0.000026059233,0.00010116193,0.000068737136,0.000055853634,2.2077394e-7,0.0037221794,0.000006229242,0.000005175844,0.001289781,0.9943519,0.0002491943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8504218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9879629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9419186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003301906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007957095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9348816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398807552","doi":"10.7910/dvn/tdu5ps","title":"Replication Data for: Attanasio OP, Oppedisano V, and Vera-Hernández M. (2015). Should Cash Transfers Be Conditional? Conditionality, Preventive Care, and Health Outcomes. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(2), 35–52.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Global Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Conditionality; Replication (statistics); Cash; Health economics; Economics; Political science; Actuarial science; Business; Health care; Welfare economics; Medicine; Finance; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.0785753175024229,"score_gpt":0.3697252594461406,"score_spread":0.2911499419437177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398807552","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011092006,0.00003805377,0.0005483621,0.0012097601,0.00075863587,0.0014763302,0.99459344,0.000041958367,0.00022426384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017911671,0.021811439,0.00051155826,0.0024267535,0.0005799586,0.00009649684,0.97257,0.000051896863,0.00016072422],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963401,0.0002675437,0.00088047626,0.0014745946,0.00036820842,0.000669093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957711,0.00042822876,0.0008964126,0.002124037,0.00015912506,0.00062108034],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002013094,0.00050869567,0.00093443133,0.0002275584,0.0011243045,0.00040689812,0.0013818716,0.00033027673,0.0009147246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017137708,0.00051242596,0.00013624005,0.0000762664,0.0012215695,0.00088658987,0.00042749668,0.00039883505,0.00024410331],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049459148,0.000051733852,0.00089373684,0.000126873,0.00033562072,0.0000023921832,0.00064628053,0.000007151708,7.054558e-7,0.006166749,0.9904238,0.0012954932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015290404,0.00011694858,0.0049185683,0.00004607962,0.00024602897,0.000012811131,0.0048652696,0.000013334309,3.1731062e-7,0.0019311184,0.9857541,0.0005663855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046703573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027010696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022340337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001111855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002001752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399091661","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781447347736.003.0001","title":"What does work-based welfare reform mean for women?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Policy Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare reform; Welfare; Work (physics); Political science; Economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Demographic economics; Engineering; Market economy; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.05680109402379767,"score_gpt":0.31103909372436045,"score_spread":0.25423799970056277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399091661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002523239,0.00017848339,0.000032119173,0.0013711362,0.00244938,0.0013126683,0.00051104586,0.0005368592,0.993356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009917522,0.00050236104,0.00009400521,0.00091421494,0.0020958048,0.00041041177,0.000078944344,0.00019178941,0.98579496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971352,0.000053139724,0.00044383825,0.00063504133,0.0006824813,0.0010503031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982293,0.00016248832,0.0002997757,0.00067351625,0.0002505206,0.0003843607],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058162544,0.00049078185,0.00055121834,0.00031856756,0.00080040866,0.00048455942,0.0008156838,0.0007699192,0.00004123513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089759655,0.00040926487,0.0003233914,0.000035980716,0.0004633978,0.00014662807,0.0001519699,0.00037341763,0.000029859657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004386772,0.000009482288,0.000011243848,0.00015838885,0.000109920744,0.000005605553,0.028155021,0.0000058878127,8.1588183e-7,0.96183586,0.0004737321,0.009190174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040328564,0.000046862668,0.00005375837,0.00020796745,0.000052633237,1.6456903e-7,0.0049593635,0.000010607877,0.0000062188456,0.10074224,0.8929187,0.0005981719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073392955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010467245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89244497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000986786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058177515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399143455","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.05.003","title":"Bargaining between the sexes: outside options and leisure time in hunter-gatherer households","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution and Human Behavior","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of British Columbia","funders":"Leverhulme Trust; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Economics; Labour economics; Welfare; Subsistence agriculture; Leverage (statistics); Division of labour; Social capital; Population; Demographic economics; Redistribution (election); Sociology; Geography; Demography; Market economy; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.03793612649857791,"score_gpt":0.31291519855284805,"score_spread":0.27497907205427013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399143455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944022,0.0008378193,0.00011917602,0.00026454477,0.00011421493,0.0002142971,0.000027197666,0.000112117305,0.003908431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958793,0.000069645495,0.000045018005,0.000028993445,0.00020235793,0.0000269983,0.000010482719,0.000013987663,0.0037232505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999149,0.000113969465,0.0001530614,0.0002100637,0.00015754509,0.00021631975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973184,0.000050984512,0.000022671535,0.00010247911,0.000019747942,0.00007228939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000480792,0.000095437164,0.0001183252,0.000078147874,0.0006548366,0.00020229246,0.0000966048,0.000108880515,0.00007419674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008222204,0.00007894429,0.00003433838,0.00016375883,0.00026432384,0.00017410371,0.000039597257,0.0001981027,0.000020045552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.8676565e-7,0.000024055664,0.9418278,0.000005092425,0.0000071459076,0.0000047132403,0.017604774,0.0000036690774,0.00017829439,0.039223067,0.00030437094,0.0008163808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012611506,0.00002400731,0.98627985,0.000032032232,0.00005371916,0.0000012979934,0.008123967,0.000087553075,5.783813e-7,0.0015215662,0.0036355557,0.000113741444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014052236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026921884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044452116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000904288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059819562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.503654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399259217","doi":"10.61838/kman.jprfc.1.4.6","title":"Changing Perceptions of Marriage and Family Life Among Millennials","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychosociological Research in Family and Culture","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Social psychology; Family life; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.13371159812239944,"score_gpt":0.4282657930170274,"score_spread":0.294554194894628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399259217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893818,0.0031712123,0.000038911767,0.0014237612,0.00025815377,0.00019230315,0.0000175593,0.0000150029055,0.0055012875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95026183,0.048336323,0.0002151979,0.00023817891,0.0003682139,0.000007612424,0.0000026631765,0.000006968202,0.00056299265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969825,0.0009887944,0.00046250908,0.00022084836,0.00075010315,0.00059522904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984367,0.00055847486,0.00015568879,0.000099361976,0.0003956458,0.00035415703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063376343,0.000121060795,0.00037305758,0.0003998659,0.00052699435,0.000068890084,0.00030597483,0.0004140072,0.000023068405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011206515,0.00008433198,0.00010856956,0.0011104546,0.0012575539,0.00018279966,0.00009700372,0.0009402403,0.000005303479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023900635,0.00034371528,0.67651707,0.00015648511,0.00014230133,0.00015815055,0.24095483,0.00005393719,0.02110355,0.02000425,0.034758415,0.005568288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043037886,0.00023620359,0.6827949,0.00011425971,0.0000068271643,0.0000015603484,0.29881287,0.000030123514,8.45846e-7,0.0145508405,0.0029320933,0.00008906535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009375714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005118768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057858042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052809948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013500541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46335098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399451863","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4854544","title":"Spousal Labor Supply Adjustments to Extended Benefits Weeks: Evidence from Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.016105891958705966,"score_gpt":0.278662161819369,"score_spread":0.262556269860663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399451863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93544716,0.049175568,0.00018509672,0.0063197766,0.0066189584,0.0005640599,0.0006580681,0.0000894748,0.0009418326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9470975,0.0445057,0.00030390732,0.00081010064,0.0025174427,0.0000371234,0.000056523993,0.00008010099,0.0045915986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992379,0.00037671055,0.00064819877,0.00088969397,0.0016784683,0.004027947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979151,0.00020177114,0.00029667845,0.0005132396,0.00044986955,0.0006233717],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021733688,0.0005269586,0.00056630454,0.00021901562,0.000660594,0.00048793099,0.0017026557,0.0004717405,0.00015107253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003334189,0.00052574027,0.00023097121,0.0005263525,0.00008740307,0.0001674635,0.00070217514,0.0058610686,0.00009633283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064964494,0.000672077,0.3025685,0.00033886076,0.0061209495,0.0008496016,0.06593143,0.010919376,0.000493795,0.46573088,0.03155704,0.11416785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006885515,0.00037710814,0.22103895,0.0018462966,0.00073694135,0.000055338493,0.07508527,0.0002481679,0.000025356347,0.69063175,0.0073540914,0.0019121832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9008074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99153507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22490087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010491919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07529384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399631356","doi":"10.1016/j.rssm.2024.100950","title":"Earnings trajectories of individuals in same-sex and different-sex couples: Evidence from administrative data","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; McGill University; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Earnings; Demographic economics; Psychology; Business; Economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.3250779465169531,"score_gpt":0.487088787508564,"score_spread":0.1620108409916109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399631356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960883,0.001280019,0.00008225055,0.00094125984,0.000053309584,0.0005199411,0.00034654932,0.000020550426,0.000667814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970568,0.002495778,0.000076790144,0.0000055623004,0.000092398994,0.0000451736,0.00008656566,0.0000054111133,0.0001355499],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717784,0.0010422361,0.00034474418,0.00052964553,0.0006243938,0.0002811412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764025,0.0018675266,0.000052348467,0.00023204068,0.00011168098,0.00009615514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004570786,0.00009610744,0.00021692278,0.000107476,0.00031852463,0.0002317399,0.00032084607,0.00014393462,0.000038141403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009822373,0.00009258152,0.000017977904,0.00053199433,0.001363508,0.00037633075,0.00010806214,0.00041752937,8.732883e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022582033,0.00018647908,0.80226094,0.00014746157,0.000018767176,0.0000025916531,0.16827835,5.901627e-7,0.0012288262,0.015452254,0.00010396412,0.01229721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109756154,0.000040782143,0.8719699,0.00008116321,0.000004857661,6.326641e-8,0.11067849,0.00053066696,0.00007825046,0.016053861,0.00036582456,0.00008643514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012652391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020092187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06970893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001423843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006401612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99778855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399770597","doi":"10.1556/032.2024.00012","title":"Unpaid work, paid work and gender inequality: An analysis of time transfer accounts for Turkey","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Oeconomica","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu","keywords":"Work (physics); Inequality; Labour economics; Unpaid work; Economics; Time-use survey; Gender inequality; Transfer (computing); Paid work; Demographic economics; Sociology; Working hours; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0402965345523464,"score_gpt":0.3003337399163156,"score_spread":0.26003720536396924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399770597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99546355,0.00024145895,0.00088205806,0.00048571316,0.00023677383,0.00023592262,0.00020587232,0.00006594071,0.0021826988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983343,0.0001799885,0.00031655486,0.00022298763,0.00014073454,0.000019651588,0.00008044437,0.000021294463,0.0006840673],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987577,0.000112654205,0.00032300822,0.00039160656,0.000105717634,0.00030930914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918973,0.00034269804,0.000037956244,0.00024114254,0.000050278875,0.0001381625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089580583,0.00014348465,0.0003614497,0.00021585081,0.00013506069,0.00017177821,0.00023437868,0.00016559158,0.00029077526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003338742,0.00014325159,0.00018397288,0.0005254182,0.00015389075,0.00034243727,0.000022981973,0.000091855065,0.000014223425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004033409,0.00043918274,0.7056761,0.00031503793,0.0075067584,0.0000055548376,0.1910141,0.0020581847,0.0011088559,0.060427267,0.0049260412,0.026119603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015268424,0.0002245827,0.7893829,0.000068074594,0.0053620185,3.7674982e-7,0.019898662,0.042851638,0.000055237124,0.014041792,0.12469142,0.0018964551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033455004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058929296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17111544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083409264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013606455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.584163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399851039","doi":"10.61959/s2876856c","title":"Family Change and Diversity in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Geography; Evolutionary biology; Biology; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.1052288100658278,"score_gpt":0.2942356079259648,"score_spread":0.18900679786013702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399851039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23877609,0.0044770446,0.0000027064566,0.0004619931,0.003694682,0.00025907424,0.00013515109,0.00003927534,0.752154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93963933,0.022396194,0.000027281678,0.00065540394,0.00043357245,0.000009251301,0.000025972548,0.000015510424,0.036797512],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842906,0.000043328786,0.00013536261,0.0002870735,0.0008052638,0.0002999342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995851,0.000039697406,0.000040880503,0.00010695729,0.00010363789,0.00012371108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004791113,0.00013237825,0.00022803423,0.00009186897,0.00019581139,0.00004373692,0.00018327932,0.0001987291,0.000051429284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041159306,0.00012763533,0.00003224192,0.0002456752,0.00006955663,0.000057292902,0.00032734894,0.00026187656,0.0000062010454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012070336,0.00001056145,0.8967709,0.00020581626,0.00004391929,0.00039075036,0.013870897,4.843808e-7,4.536513e-7,0.0041253967,0.07807754,0.00650209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058718317,0.000005725187,0.5715092,0.000064967804,0.00003922098,0.0000012302069,0.035474863,0.000017675235,3.7806707e-8,0.0008509835,0.39168122,0.0002961639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99978244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99989873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71535647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019685407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008761012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399986808","doi":"10.3386/w32612","title":"One Cohort at a Time: A New Perspective on the Declining Gender Pay Gap","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Cohort; Gender pay gap; Demographic economics; Demography; Economics; Sociology; Labour economics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.43454428350764723,"score_gpt":0.5302683436242822,"score_spread":0.09572406011663498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399986808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060543576,0.0010759556,0.0000034844336,0.0073113427,0.0008220295,0.0008545269,0.00013251652,0.00003415319,0.98371166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5505351,0.006328006,0.00017159428,0.00025212835,0.0050848396,0.00016889311,0.00028853054,0.000112416776,0.4370585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99440867,0.0004882889,0.0005487243,0.0007402752,0.0032351685,0.0005788977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99392277,0.0029663348,0.00023380111,0.00035021047,0.002320479,0.00020643185],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011983086,0.00021731704,0.00044595005,0.00056864787,0.0005788467,0.0001876401,0.0007865106,0.0005207675,0.0023979088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033917613,0.00017010831,0.0002799884,0.00039530342,0.00065823575,0.00009023015,0.00027227178,0.0012970378,0.0018091302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027419877,0.00004878818,0.0019700793,0.000029787967,0.00051002635,0.0000045637894,0.0039845114,0.00011697358,0.0000133262,0.7768031,0.2162732,0.00021821047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021051992,0.00007978904,0.0056066033,0.0001345109,0.00006595471,0.000003834865,0.0057853977,0.0003515848,0.0000070169767,0.90126926,0.08617245,0.00031305553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014979789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033648175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5466531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0103082955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020760758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400004705","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4874256","title":"One Cohort at a Time: A New Perspective on the Declining Gender Pay Gap","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Cohort; Demographic economics; Political science; Demography; Psychology; Economics; Medicine; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.028976059834805282,"score_gpt":0.30617738109395926,"score_spread":0.277201321259154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400004705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65414006,0.018967647,0.008614532,0.038439874,0.002035738,0.0008146514,0.000010598378,0.00035104912,0.27662584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471468,0.008019952,0.000057002482,0.00063895836,0.0015691677,0.00000575265,0.0000017367518,0.000033997312,0.04252666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965918,0.0002950896,0.0002180489,0.00030322032,0.0006663308,0.0019254946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991604,0.00030300755,0.00007769372,0.00016592341,0.00012325273,0.00016973537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034342855,0.00015887766,0.00017274222,0.000098207165,0.0010888159,0.0002569585,0.00039007785,0.00012271269,0.0003771707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002268291,0.00010506261,0.00018634136,0.00043628024,0.00014096557,0.00014491263,0.00004449493,0.0020689187,0.00048462715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027364265,0.000037847974,0.004048874,0.0000018150671,0.00044539198,0.000008474451,0.022821832,0.000033145985,0.00008037927,0.967225,0.0024473849,0.0028224925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030691962,0.00022667827,0.0063194544,0.000045240806,0.00016592817,0.00007063485,0.08191126,0.0005659642,0.000005428983,0.89302343,0.017057398,0.00030167677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009336672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005419133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2930067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004363001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072622905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400441608","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2024.11969symposium","title":"Decoding the Fabric of Gender Inequality: Psychological Factors and Social Contexts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Decoding methods; Social inequality; Inequality; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.08604449125790678,"score_gpt":0.36246338793329835,"score_spread":0.27641889667539155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400441608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.969778,0.000514819,0.00014840325,0.002262244,0.00012128156,0.00028825717,0.0000054651737,0.00006627056,0.026815288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980267,0.00086713454,0.00014190462,0.00042540548,0.00010311194,0.000009411065,9.119142e-7,0.000009329035,0.0004160882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987325,0.000030629566,0.00028933957,0.0002681191,0.00042112084,0.00025827563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969363,0.000091222006,0.00011035248,0.000027611308,0.000036890506,0.00004031109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011279746,0.00012050705,0.00018756141,0.00010763002,0.0002650093,0.000076448945,0.00032556267,0.00014944095,0.000024772327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000360607,0.00008395175,0.00007537092,0.00038864271,0.00044253372,0.0002226239,0.00013432074,0.0002067264,0.0000022386016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007793254,0.00003377583,0.060540702,0.0003675189,0.00010916645,5.307161e-7,0.041779134,2.391447e-7,0.00014703836,0.88388664,0.0031027878,0.010024653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031539987,0.000045549314,0.7983822,0.00006613849,0.00018364658,6.9977136e-7,0.111590415,0.00011622465,0.000061619365,0.05639158,0.032585602,0.0002609117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032116208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002150246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8274951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030420691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000729223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3423453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400714657","doi":"10.1787/5415dcea-en","title":"Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Taxing wages","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social security; Payroll; Cash; Public economics; Government (linguistics); Economics; Cash transfers; Business; Payroll tax; Income tax; Labour economics; Finance; Accounting; Market economy","score_opus":0.0227961081447175,"score_gpt":0.24371678990875656,"score_spread":0.22092068176403906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400714657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00057887775,0.00086866686,0.0000088647175,0.0007184471,0.00159945,0.00013474781,0.00017538971,0.00007655028,0.995839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031108916,0.0008557256,0.00007241973,0.0005961562,0.0005124036,0.000006122436,0.000051799077,0.000041261665,0.9667552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985729,0.00003620048,0.00015959764,0.0002617052,0.00065997365,0.00030962407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939066,0.00009502613,0.00012504043,0.00022456983,0.000052473577,0.00011223283],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025314788,0.00017514592,0.00021284627,0.00005561349,0.00077145203,0.000046831745,0.00038259954,0.00014718063,0.0034167643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044777073,0.00019923909,0.000071746515,0.0000372268,0.00011257314,0.000043531567,0.00009729374,0.00037663677,0.00002390976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016334467,0.0000042960537,0.0004084864,0.000021162394,0.00005289494,0.0001427356,0.0032685713,0.000028837187,0.0000018669833,0.91672766,0.077319235,0.0020226322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038956936,0.000007678146,0.00033595075,0.000015124958,0.000021717819,8.5857835e-7,0.0015725236,0.0000028632858,1.8225653e-7,0.006683334,0.9910768,0.0002439737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8606188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93788177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9137576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005732339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022695265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400823345","doi":"10.4324/9781003300014-11","title":"From Girls to Mothers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.026404355757683847,"score_gpt":0.2787376762231234,"score_spread":0.25233332046543955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400823345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003098009,0.00034025937,0.00030629963,0.0014413359,0.002023846,0.00023354928,0.00017656825,0.0002157545,0.99495256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020556208,0.00028346476,0.0006661513,0.0015899289,0.0013118086,0.0000042958195,0.000024262363,0.000053390846,0.9940111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987927,0.000009632543,0.00016587556,0.00038531443,0.00039780498,0.00024865475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994076,0.00005796122,0.00003274998,0.00024611977,0.00005658796,0.00019900175],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014176426,0.00019730479,0.00021717805,0.000095788986,0.0001228291,0.00013347491,0.0003274197,0.00038411014,0.0048032855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012686618,0.00018223446,0.00013502475,0.00004528988,0.000104192826,0.000037397316,0.00006823598,0.00020921197,0.005587584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001453639,0.0000029009718,0.00003945333,0.000004988211,0.00006105802,0.000010797781,0.012505697,0.0000037470445,0.0000038354115,0.9434371,0.04257449,0.0013544863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024725756,0.000009339675,0.000042012027,0.00003161174,0.000033318393,5.029644e-8,0.0029391986,0.0000082104025,2.7646132e-7,0.22886394,0.76783794,0.00020936254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063976804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00897466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7252635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014490385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018301484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99610645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400929963","doi":"10.1111/cjag.12368","title":"Milk, money, and gender: Exploring the link between women's decision‐making in dairy production and welfare investments in boys versus girls","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Welfare; Production (economics); Milk production; Economics; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Animal science; Biology; Market economy","score_opus":0.056672257635566464,"score_gpt":0.22809851516258123,"score_spread":0.17142625752701476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400929963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98685884,0.0012624537,0.0000013729856,0.0081846705,0.0029314165,0.00027496606,0.000047718524,0.000007913205,0.00043067205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724454,0.0010685807,0.00012089178,0.00009918394,0.0013546041,0.00002306441,0.0000061803803,0.000017532975,0.00006545002],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804574,0.00009668411,0.00066487864,0.00039232514,0.000028000606,0.00077239145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985016,0.00023784795,0.00019101595,0.00013631368,0.00006752971,0.00086570956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010501276,0.00022824404,0.0003922532,0.00048694763,0.00044093392,0.00039898264,0.00032955874,0.00013131932,0.000022385071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025533815,0.00018690724,0.00007211043,0.00029600825,0.0002016587,0.0010641614,0.000034683297,0.00045466112,0.0000032852417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011376354,0.000013352323,0.49529448,0.00019732531,0.00046877365,0.00033021063,0.31339738,0.008258528,0.000010681192,0.0646741,0.0006515443,0.116589844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004712809,0.00008774023,0.9037856,0.000174918,0.000035447138,0.000056542427,0.07614782,0.00010661359,9.2675214e-7,0.007939161,0.010854278,0.0003396957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032462526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90092856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.868466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036325569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007642675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97398037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401412704","doi":"10.32920/26523934","title":"For Black Women, Health Care is an Abolition Issue","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.03675153380087833,"score_gpt":0.3633587268675263,"score_spread":0.326607193066648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401412704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6576021,0.004897567,0.0045126695,0.025652334,0.01294754,0.0048083183,0.0037621818,0.0013376911,0.28447962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8982392,0.0035549821,0.0053177145,0.013781756,0.0049550873,0.00045343768,0.0009459714,0.00010338733,0.07264844],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980275,0.000116526084,0.0002827996,0.0006087099,0.00034651998,0.0006179148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989231,0.000029714676,0.00009526762,0.00036272826,0.0002697331,0.00031943346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059079146,0.00021096831,0.0003134466,0.00010445415,0.00035248767,0.00027317865,0.00035650047,0.000399134,0.00036028904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024110479,0.00020986059,0.00012864835,0.00015332078,0.00013718025,0.000059178,0.00019542407,0.00033933643,0.00013520056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007543112,0.000046232413,0.0003141719,0.0012708469,0.000042594944,8.610629e-7,0.8322649,0.00007720788,0.0000012047847,0.10544116,0.055999722,0.004533564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012397132,0.00009927615,0.0005840248,0.00005967729,0.000018671755,8.206199e-8,0.5673881,0.000707592,0.0000020138916,0.11732682,0.31335354,0.00033619805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007806012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006094611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26487678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093432167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015261227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401412749","doi":"10.32920/26523934.v1","title":"For Black Women, Health Care is an Abolition Issue","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Black women; Political science; Sociology; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03675153380087833,"score_gpt":0.3633587268675263,"score_spread":0.326607193066648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401412749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6576021,0.004897567,0.0045126695,0.025652334,0.01294754,0.0048083183,0.0037621818,0.0013376911,0.28447962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8982392,0.0035549821,0.0053177145,0.013781756,0.0049550873,0.00045343768,0.0009459714,0.00010338733,0.07264844],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980275,0.000116526084,0.0002827996,0.0006087099,0.00034651998,0.0006179148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989231,0.000029714676,0.00009526762,0.00036272826,0.0002697331,0.00031943346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059079146,0.00021096831,0.0003134466,0.00010445415,0.00035248767,0.00027317865,0.00035650047,0.000399134,0.00036028904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024110479,0.00020986059,0.00012864835,0.00015332078,0.00013718025,0.000059178,0.00019542407,0.00033933643,0.00013520056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007543112,0.000046232413,0.0003141719,0.0012708469,0.000042594944,8.610629e-7,0.8322649,0.00007720788,0.0000012047847,0.10544116,0.055999722,0.004533564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012397132,0.00009927615,0.0005840248,0.00005967729,0.000018671755,8.206199e-8,0.5673881,0.000707592,0.0000020138916,0.11732682,0.31335354,0.00033619805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007806012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006094611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26487678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093432167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015261227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401777575","doi":"10.1177/02627280241272432","title":"Heteronormativity and its Private and Public Balancing in Sri Lanka","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South Asia Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heteronormativity; Sri lanka; Gender studies; Political science; Business; Public administration; Sociology; Queer; South asia; Ethnology","score_opus":0.08271387583133846,"score_gpt":0.37523601924967825,"score_spread":0.2925221434183398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401777575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850566,0.0013310255,0.000027732338,0.0015117092,0.00010680457,0.00023121231,0.000015635087,0.00005289748,0.011666377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916005,0.0003393422,0.000054971926,0.000020732341,0.00008992886,0.000014500131,0.000002904097,0.0000072958182,0.0003102849],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811023,0.00045624594,0.000117997864,0.0002584598,0.00047660418,0.00058045844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942976,0.00020061343,0.000011169466,0.0001007742,0.000071276016,0.00018640266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002822606,0.00007221071,0.000107366184,0.00027268112,0.00033967814,0.00046860147,0.00015013033,0.00009596313,0.000021326356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039763143,0.00006640824,0.000015493788,0.0007096708,0.00021070322,0.00031134082,0.00015602152,0.00043342606,0.000040790503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008565312,0.000028036131,0.64592016,0.00021815218,0.000016662761,0.0000430674,0.26051396,0.0000017457544,0.00026942597,0.08748156,0.00009670081,0.0054019485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067409896,0.00010759932,0.6749176,0.00019210692,0.000006768978,0.0000055396895,0.27847597,0.012140019,0.000030000385,0.011963237,0.021059979,0.00042709176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004359532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018744804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075518325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099747376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022715761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45187348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401809656","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v13i1.71193","title":"Economic Policy Trends: The Gendered Implications of an Infrastructure-Focused Recovery: Issues and Policy Thoughts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic recovery; Economics; Natural resource economics; Public economics; Political science; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.042331170711045016,"score_gpt":0.3365714932529902,"score_spread":0.29424032254194515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401809656","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1934531,0.00032081796,0.0006125566,0.73721105,0.00009462949,0.00065805495,0.0010812117,0.00021367846,0.06635491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894507,0.0009982508,0.0008406879,0.0037798956,0.0029789105,0.00009913842,0.000098176075,0.00003786678,0.001716383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720645,0.0006749922,0.00067949836,0.0004272545,0.00035638973,0.000655432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680775,0.00028727954,0.0005877253,0.0012159371,0.0003963439,0.00070493907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010429362,0.00025351823,0.0003628517,0.0008249549,0.0010768466,0.000451352,0.0020057147,0.00019179276,0.00015261883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002898955,0.00018433081,0.00016572076,0.0035498913,0.0012151907,0.0011554842,0.00025393403,0.00030932817,0.000023255483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064737205,0.000060683564,0.009455024,0.000009278867,0.00011515548,2.4011012e-8,0.012678125,0.00009424321,0.00023066225,0.9513539,0.012381762,0.013614644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004474067,0.000079996295,0.7001927,0.000003608159,0.00005133929,0.0000033350166,0.0072118016,0.00027408553,0.00002934781,0.14144516,0.15000999,0.00025123314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023727702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047846413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80990875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035285225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005550749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98467904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401958956","doi":"10.56397/sssh.2024.08.02","title":"Impact of Gender Equality Policies on Women’s Career Mental Health and Well-Being","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Science & Humanities","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Gender equality; Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.11951706481166019,"score_gpt":0.4261743398659556,"score_spread":0.3066572750542954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401958956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9064103,0.0021910458,0.0000018774234,0.00032981584,0.00080254173,0.00018081392,0.000027325288,0.00005459073,0.09000169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965004,0.0021933522,0.000010741616,0.00033463154,0.00032491662,0.000018683917,0.0000013346614,0.000008730315,0.0006072136],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976962,0.00017875979,0.00028625823,0.0003164429,0.00077048346,0.000751847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994743,0.00012872585,0.00007605005,0.00008823001,0.00013651127,0.000096198615],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021145814,0.00015918938,0.0003156906,0.0002568442,0.0025659502,0.00018379073,0.00027654096,0.00004838203,0.000021555734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012985982,0.00013720905,0.000075808595,0.00069823937,0.0060738814,0.00035294244,0.00018753562,0.00015918573,0.000002631884],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041394974,0.000019606096,0.020489607,0.00004939766,0.000027182725,7.8811877e-7,0.6784791,0.00000144916,0.000010090702,0.30019718,0.00040289448,0.0003185873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010015115,0.00015743349,0.058829445,0.00005257486,0.000003704146,3.026279e-7,0.9095953,0.000007632374,0.0000014747025,0.02923642,0.0018580869,0.00015745964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052746385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024213325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27096075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002275054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083753484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99873257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402285468","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v11i1.53165","title":"Social Policy Trends: Paying for the Essentials: Shelter, Food and Energy Consumption by Household Income Quintile for 2010 and 2016","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Economics; Food consumption; Public economics; Demographic economics; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Agricultural economics; Social science","score_opus":0.07090517521745547,"score_gpt":0.3499363518726912,"score_spread":0.2790311766552357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402285468","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24874105,0.0029678955,0.07236474,0.65318555,0.00096872996,0.0019989833,0.0050512403,0.0005040288,0.014217799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870186,0.0009469074,0.00033348758,0.0014771763,0.0026095614,0.00047850556,0.0000684947,0.000031829688,0.0070354776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834144,0.00020859938,0.00036109245,0.000288091,0.00023278678,0.00056800083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806404,0.00054797425,0.00031092158,0.00038647343,0.00045682557,0.00023376306],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015192786,0.00016515078,0.00020707048,0.00042216855,0.0024114102,0.0005559699,0.0006465348,0.00016700769,0.000037219765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014260601,0.00011763048,0.00010489955,0.00086241675,0.0015027091,0.0006416424,0.0001376663,0.000110055866,0.0000022527597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000097512,0.000072492505,0.003549586,0.00001693948,0.00012516126,3.4694834e-9,0.0033189221,3.1305962e-7,0.00033072944,0.84143,0.13514782,0.015998254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016210974,0.00018052649,0.14334661,0.000011912019,0.00016012727,0.000002641334,0.0054074107,0.00042782107,0.00005240451,0.06578544,0.7825862,0.00041777204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072720395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7756446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011092542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000917427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402285813","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v11i1.44203","title":"Social Policy Trends: Social Assistance Caseloads in Alberta by Family Composition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Composition (language); Social policy; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Law; Art","score_opus":0.0409555020705369,"score_gpt":0.3512208196158905,"score_spread":0.31026531754535364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402285813","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18669522,0.00010568037,0.00054969237,0.44327635,0.00015036575,0.00038399277,0.00043999532,0.0001615495,0.36823714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821092,0.000047925263,0.00010150513,0.0029344838,0.0027634564,0.000103453014,0.00016715197,0.00002727756,0.011745529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678946,0.00073943683,0.0005586597,0.00036647945,0.0006561233,0.00088983186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980536,0.00017052604,0.0003728161,0.00044592965,0.0006613023,0.00029579678],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013518479,0.00021698742,0.00032982783,0.0009281985,0.0020292925,0.00039618142,0.0012415646,0.00027143088,0.00017625368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088721,0.00020417836,0.00020206094,0.0055931606,0.0016038405,0.0008766473,0.0001218903,0.00033727495,0.000096857315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007081944,0.00026732186,0.0055253054,0.000004663425,0.00013360362,9.5876516e-8,0.014523659,4.7275316e-7,0.00046680268,0.84100604,0.1361883,0.0018766508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080662704,0.000046436446,0.69807833,0.000004693138,0.00011554676,0.0000018042741,0.008451895,0.000072719544,0.000012334146,0.021442888,0.27052695,0.00043977518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.102448955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035003167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81956315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078760413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029238546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402286526","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v11i1.61656","title":"Social Policy Trends: Domestic Violence and the Holidays","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Demographic economics; Political science; Suicide prevention; Economics; Poison control; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.04061643278610445,"score_gpt":0.36029882452187545,"score_spread":0.319682391735771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402286526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1404946,0.0003671997,0.00096417486,0.5762401,0.00018716686,0.00050966645,0.00011411907,0.00023192799,0.28089103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98770916,0.0006472909,0.00011254646,0.002711942,0.0035886813,0.00010014793,0.000011667714,0.000017321712,0.0051012305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974244,0.00071683363,0.00037801111,0.00026734642,0.00053454965,0.0006788503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767756,0.00035970254,0.0002926666,0.00066053885,0.0006811413,0.00032839095],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025984664,0.0001660468,0.00022927526,0.0006119151,0.0024791986,0.0005082583,0.0014420862,0.00013678634,0.000151869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005550043,0.00010623866,0.00012250389,0.003956966,0.005270622,0.00055153185,0.00022384427,0.00026631614,0.00008100364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045781658,0.00004295072,0.0030989177,0.0000027017943,0.000036675254,3.1346904e-8,0.010044722,3.8803987e-7,0.000013350692,0.970172,0.0071372096,0.009446485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00122987,0.000039890696,0.5308953,0.000015205926,0.00006772124,0.000007101565,0.010554616,0.00017292552,0.0000028336553,0.31316438,0.14356928,0.00028087696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016196324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020779215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8472146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018245103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026275506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402317321","doi":"10.1017/s1744552324000181","title":"The social construction of childhood: is a minimum age of marriage attainable in plural societies?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Sociology; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01858541913049665,"score_gpt":0.3188866371314921,"score_spread":0.30030121800099546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402317321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.976833,0.0009643807,0.00011603181,0.004743015,0.0021601426,0.00009362082,0.000032772597,0.0000046394102,0.015052409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99837273,0.0004588366,0.000112575086,0.00026335142,0.0003325373,0.0000016794406,0.0000016986472,0.000006269936,0.00045031705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984504,0.00013328606,0.0005822876,0.00008432254,0.00059352093,0.00015615743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896985,0.00030141912,0.0002738632,0.00004436509,0.0003825359,0.00002797569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010199639,0.000072649396,0.00018858083,0.00011326791,0.000095714815,0.00008684049,0.0004109391,0.00009008211,0.00005408326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011212875,0.000059281196,0.00016628773,0.00017535475,0.000553998,0.00024406594,0.000039553383,0.00024974425,0.0000013577078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012243552,0.00014522446,0.01808677,0.00003281492,0.00025559045,0.00011486804,0.17468049,0.00003562855,0.0006359462,0.7931157,0.0018395297,0.01093505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003927552,0.0002672228,0.090881675,0.0010708113,0.00006589481,0.00008015203,0.47787833,0.0006943863,0.0006021651,0.29375273,0.1303461,0.00043297457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012276669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003207984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49936292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023382832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037867844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2417417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402369910","doi":"10.5771/9781442248632","title":"Beyond Marriage","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.022455191943601596,"score_gpt":0.2650360953830297,"score_spread":0.2425809034394281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402369910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024407267,0.00043071844,0.00006132285,0.0011449411,0.0059667863,0.00068404496,0.00008109688,0.00032506534,0.9910619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055241142,0.00005751001,0.0002050874,0.0018069771,0.0039128345,0.000046477424,0.0001915637,0.000120105,0.98813534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959779,0.00020949806,0.00057215453,0.00093262224,0.001178737,0.0011290936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647987,0.0002687193,0.0005910277,0.0016854876,0.00037849357,0.0005963921],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012959962,0.0006159592,0.00075076456,0.00030999153,0.0016827339,0.0034255176,0.0024906723,0.0019194462,0.0011867732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043464324,0.00066963036,0.00049799867,0.000049637925,0.00088549044,0.00068668975,0.00034891532,0.0014157048,0.00021555062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008307769,0.000014955288,0.0002679351,0.00005998739,0.00012614002,0.00005364071,0.008546901,3.3015786e-7,0.0000016682226,0.3140966,0.67018586,0.0066376654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028968774,0.000040256,0.00027973225,0.00007802243,0.00010175596,0.0000017058213,0.0021236602,0.0000027791264,9.60768e-7,0.15568155,0.8407419,0.00065801456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016708628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004520803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17055601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045694268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031147278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402983212","doi":"10.3138/chr.105.2.br17","title":"<i>A Liberal-Labour Lady: The Times and Life of Mary Ellen Spear Smith.</i> Veronica Strong-Boag.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Spear; History; Art; Art history; Ancient history","score_opus":0.023236732181979435,"score_gpt":0.26023448896661333,"score_spread":0.2369977567846339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402983212","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009569172,0.8782193,0.000015174375,0.034765095,0.00093351566,0.00039675535,0.000064432366,0.000042980708,0.084605835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09027827,0.83409804,0.00016605787,0.0074862493,0.00064025173,0.00002771424,0.000009529429,0.00004360961,0.067250304],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986104,0.0001925111,0.00028262418,0.0002552108,0.0002710434,0.00038825645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881405,0.00016574806,0.00005120877,0.0002637684,0.00006633254,0.0006388904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062754285,0.00013263022,0.00031968023,0.000059716174,0.00026335334,0.00004853466,0.0003362493,0.000094862175,0.00048217812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030493372,0.00010196059,0.00011199954,0.00047725288,0.00012953133,0.00008940022,0.000031153144,0.0002400672,0.00008395762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014224911,0.00001156236,0.0009886131,0.0012286091,0.000044640394,0.000027160499,0.0017604629,9.517294e-7,8.891719e-7,0.08805272,0.89013696,0.017745996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003504614,0.000020969012,0.00095370563,0.00045204273,0.000070316724,0.0000012557069,0.0001792715,0.000016077302,3.9739625e-8,0.0004766028,0.99767405,0.00012063961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09586322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11699846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10753706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017884107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024530827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9101575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403300652","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4948651","title":"The Social Construction of Childhood: Is a Minimum Age of Marriage attainable in Plural Societies?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Sociology; History; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Demography; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00746679655440211,"score_gpt":0.26805055638312353,"score_spread":0.2605837598287214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403300652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98624647,0.0045190635,0.00040765587,0.0024339836,0.00060450315,0.00014591428,0.000009245735,0.000018074976,0.005615071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895323,0.0076890434,0.000045399163,0.000050025654,0.00034379624,0.0000028537834,0.0000018579832,0.000011961865,0.002322772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768215,0.00019354156,0.0003468413,0.00012936293,0.0004005712,0.0012475074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995459,0.00010183954,0.00014698516,0.00007208786,0.000096551186,0.000036662346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024551826,0.000099430596,0.00018297682,0.00008907606,0.0005892232,0.000086089385,0.00028368537,0.0001273988,0.00002325957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058767673,0.00007954821,0.00018304064,0.0004722301,0.0004972538,0.00015955645,0.000028483939,0.0009920233,0.0000021628073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027278315,0.00005602032,0.0069106813,0.00003183894,0.00019129596,0.000005536,0.07565549,0.000008082428,0.00041408686,0.9070383,0.0008033484,0.008858045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004110711,0.00011221248,0.0072744736,0.000037736645,0.000036240934,0.00002431836,0.3521761,0.00010331182,0.000023949446,0.63491154,0.0047582,0.00013083959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000496415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033953064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2765206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007245096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003941945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6992841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403581799","doi":"10.5430/rwe.v15n1p1","title":"Women Labor Force Participation and Its Impact on Economic Growth: A Study of Latin America and the Caribbean Region","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in World Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Caribbean region; Development economics; Caribbean island; Economics; Geography; Economic growth; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.08375723658693805,"score_gpt":0.394466950776082,"score_spread":0.31070971418914395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403581799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887047,0.00029000174,0.0000016918626,0.0021076603,0.000049320613,0.0006737614,0.0000072556954,0.000018789267,0.008146849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986801,0.0004505229,0.0000032324797,0.000034672154,0.00007574539,0.00014533327,0.0000013315597,0.000011228823,0.0005978129],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853814,0.0005298577,0.00020186757,0.0002393299,0.00011827968,0.00037252757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987438,0.00094042945,0.00003744779,0.00012403012,0.000045635574,0.00010870091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017164362,0.00007672236,0.00017748683,0.0002984695,0.00016919491,0.00015785325,0.00013218471,0.000028825496,0.000015123506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086649736,0.000057145968,0.000020571428,0.00046539228,0.00027790462,0.00018794039,0.00006307464,0.00021418797,0.000008453876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033916417,0.00019949945,0.52605534,0.000113508984,0.00013614904,0.000014276092,0.26851615,0.00070371793,0.0000059787158,0.19717772,0.0006987641,0.0060397605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027780514,0.00096311764,0.7085636,0.00011122119,0.000019683168,5.928909e-7,0.17533407,0.052792937,0.000007982648,0.052019354,0.007082319,0.00032703704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005093766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076220213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18250832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036219825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018908801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7700284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403684027","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4957260","title":"The Welfare Reform’s Effect on the Occupational Employment Distribution of Single Mothers in the US","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Distribution (mathematics); Welfare; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Mathematics; Market economy","score_opus":0.011684872067031862,"score_gpt":0.2767065243984635,"score_spread":0.26502165233143166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403684027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833062,0.0013710404,0.00042094343,0.011503981,0.00035575902,0.0002245422,0.000012877228,0.000013546725,0.0027911027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984348,0.0009938418,8.509601e-7,0.00009619089,0.0001774544,0.000011265153,0.0000069013945,0.0000071145537,0.0002716161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782264,0.0005224944,0.00018708757,0.00010017342,0.00053654634,0.00083107303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994664,0.00026621998,0.000071365655,0.0001267347,0.000046776393,0.000022501605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051906267,0.000087551365,0.000074810116,0.000029955023,0.00092011667,0.0001475008,0.00040459016,0.00005301498,0.000008531818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011437475,0.00003791126,0.00010151461,0.00033557255,0.00015212382,0.000075107055,0.000013095897,0.00081960316,0.0000058471337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045193403,0.0000431569,0.0046458105,0.0000029391945,0.000058303867,0.0000012888486,0.003598602,0.00010493248,0.000038782473,0.9822992,0.000120169454,0.009041594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009851715,0.0029436254,0.30573022,0.00018060414,0.00014264726,0.00007713664,0.20216233,0.0011416798,0.00007596579,0.38197422,0.10411675,0.00046966024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011803446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0110483635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60032505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018520568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008950834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7076886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403746158","doi":"10.1111/caje.12737","title":"Home production and time use in an epidemic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Work (physics); Inequality; Pandemic; Economics; Time allocation; Demographic economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Labour economics; Microeconomics; Disease; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.11432575571574864,"score_gpt":0.21863127169000077,"score_spread":0.10430551597425212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403746158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99353945,0.000569491,0.000009833754,0.0023940937,0.0027709513,0.00018888529,0.00006956327,0.0000111934405,0.00044655034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968639,0.0005355165,0.00023977333,0.00025990742,0.0009651222,0.0000047729623,0.0000073880833,0.00003296995,0.001090663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836916,0.00014917512,0.0005346556,0.00033139295,0.0000032831833,0.000612312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979172,0.00014362966,0.0001538824,0.00019050643,0.00011265971,0.0014821349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015112122,0.00016374965,0.00034993264,0.0008231731,0.0001910151,0.00037273538,0.0002743081,0.00018852008,0.00008889807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038810488,0.00020317471,0.00007808301,0.00019940166,0.0002536623,0.0014543427,0.0000086506325,0.00034397157,0.000015352023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029894454,0.000014570644,0.27720895,0.000058864716,0.00008971282,0.00039781735,0.032852914,0.004675305,0.00004687027,0.6784595,0.0010989007,0.005066631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087671704,0.0007468144,0.15455449,0.0008292141,0.00015179363,0.00095130986,0.022517253,0.027024942,0.00001135471,0.6898284,0.10055905,0.0019486572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38837296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60959846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021933198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034643982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82852244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403767379","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4997699","title":"Nonbinary Gender Identities and Earnings: Evidence from a National Census","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Simon Fraser University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Earnings; Demographic economics; Geography; Political science; Demography; Sociology; Business; Economics; Accounting; Population","score_opus":0.027671162313862272,"score_gpt":0.30553423085076536,"score_spread":0.27786306853690307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403767379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9486426,0.038954377,0.003232861,0.0010911702,0.0009718839,0.00008415862,0.000017690034,0.00008776083,0.006917466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567649,0.038085435,0.00013316276,0.00009258114,0.0009814729,0.0000030636982,0.0000049576956,0.000014958114,0.003919504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976354,0.00016891686,0.00018194657,0.00022173936,0.00064679794,0.0011451691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993735,0.00025918218,0.00005682913,0.000055998156,0.00015501928,0.000099481294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020677468,0.000111519184,0.000109336805,0.00012183977,0.0006114726,0.0003775426,0.00021423896,0.00009282544,0.00006142899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026023487,0.00010572146,0.00007301135,0.00023457388,0.00016744781,0.0005747269,0.000041019106,0.0011070982,0.000032187698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003150415,0.000040183924,0.06626139,0.000027217615,0.0004007058,0.000054348206,0.037812192,0.0000763594,0.00041597444,0.88868606,0.0021682258,0.0040258286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017496798,0.00008286987,0.04164909,0.00009755338,0.000059653838,0.00012699226,0.06230671,0.00067415275,0.0000017409667,0.88889587,0.0056972713,0.0002331138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095390214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024184012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024612296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095335353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038996893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69178814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403796399","doi":"10.1111/sjpe.12403","title":"Household decisions and the gender gap in job satisfaction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scottish Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"Government of Alberta","keywords":"Economics; Job satisfaction; Labour economics; Gender gap; Demographic economics; Management","score_opus":0.04794835425764498,"score_gpt":0.30841336644211553,"score_spread":0.26046501218447055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403796399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7942939,0.0026019032,0.001779741,0.007515064,0.0013546933,0.00017035457,0.000017111548,0.000022636013,0.1922446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977333,0.00046393566,0.0002625568,0.0008742462,0.00047957932,0.0000020068599,2.3600714e-7,0.000008841398,0.00017527469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988126,0.00018868542,0.0003796162,0.0001154515,0.00016208082,0.00034152725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881935,0.00076790963,0.000052699976,0.00007649649,0.000050963055,0.00023259835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013149072,0.00007671628,0.00018783177,0.00015376334,0.00018059215,0.00033908305,0.00013717942,0.00008640082,0.000063113504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028422978,0.000055851095,0.00009606725,0.00018515652,0.00044516413,0.00035376285,0.000027873162,0.0003434668,0.0000073050414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008172707,0.0000052060577,0.030997882,0.000006060884,0.000022893488,0.000025753496,0.0017128797,0.000010081276,9.13216e-7,0.96418655,0.0009870626,0.0020365177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072159624,0.000025724283,0.27287346,0.00007403521,0.000043802338,0.000085554464,0.01138415,0.0002698219,0.0000011257249,0.70118636,0.0132160755,0.000118302516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011823716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012786475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26300022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017545938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036702421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32697856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403819496","doi":"10.3386/w33075","title":"Nonbinary and Transgender Identities and Earnings: Evidence from a National Census","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Census; Earnings; Demographic economics; Geography; American Community Survey; Political science; Genealogy; Demography; Sociology; History; Business; Economics; Accounting; Population","score_opus":0.3996518829931276,"score_gpt":0.5243282550710922,"score_spread":0.12467637207796456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403819496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23634912,0.018358057,0.0000095449295,0.0022019725,0.0013078166,0.0006067709,0.001252935,0.000043748874,0.73987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94751656,0.032170102,0.00022103814,0.000025097437,0.0011611104,0.00005256063,0.0003075874,0.000034338842,0.018511588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570686,0.00029039718,0.0004721293,0.0006032235,0.0025767016,0.00035071417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954522,0.0021660123,0.0001497138,0.00011017446,0.0019736832,0.00014819296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063339304,0.00018019411,0.00034298617,0.0006443407,0.00034848583,0.0002688662,0.00033006343,0.00042395797,0.00023642778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018212838,0.00019589186,0.000097883654,0.0002012132,0.0010128561,0.0003416007,0.0001589613,0.0007128613,0.00003536667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009937273,0.00010608929,0.045904223,0.0010919345,0.0009640943,0.000047451205,0.021319257,0.00023606746,0.0002630913,0.7889627,0.13970548,0.0013002133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029267857,0.000079262536,0.045011524,0.0005714883,0.000055781686,0.00001549726,0.008016367,0.00056885113,0.0000065348863,0.9173558,0.027620563,0.00040564727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014096846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002755736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7213584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012712977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070395605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403875799","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5001356","title":"Nonbinary Gender Identities and Earnings: Evidence from a National Census","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Simon Fraser University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Earnings; American Community Survey; Demographic economics; Geography; Sociology; Business; Demography; Economics; Accounting; Population","score_opus":0.027671162313862272,"score_gpt":0.30553423085076536,"score_spread":0.27786306853690307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403875799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9486426,0.038954377,0.003232861,0.0010911702,0.0009718839,0.00008415862,0.000017690034,0.00008776083,0.006917466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567649,0.038085435,0.00013316276,0.00009258114,0.0009814729,0.0000030636982,0.0000049576956,0.000014958114,0.003919504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976354,0.00016891686,0.00018194657,0.00022173936,0.00064679794,0.0011451691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993735,0.00025918218,0.00005682913,0.000055998156,0.00015501928,0.000099481294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020677468,0.000111519184,0.000109336805,0.00012183977,0.0006114726,0.0003775426,0.00021423896,0.00009282544,0.00006142899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026023487,0.00010572146,0.00007301135,0.00023457388,0.00016744781,0.0005747269,0.000041019106,0.0011070982,0.000032187698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003150415,0.000040183924,0.06626139,0.000027217615,0.0004007058,0.000054348206,0.037812192,0.0000763594,0.00041597444,0.88868606,0.0021682258,0.0040258286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017496798,0.00008286987,0.04164909,0.00009755338,0.000059653838,0.00012699226,0.06230671,0.00067415275,0.0000017409667,0.88889587,0.0056972713,0.0002331138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095390214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024184012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024612296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095335353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038996893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69178814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403995316","doi":"10.1787/c9048b15-en","title":"Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Taxing wages","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social security; Payroll; Public economics; Cash; Government (linguistics); Economics; Business; Cash transfers; Labour economics; Finance; Accounting; Market economy","score_opus":0.02111517130689948,"score_gpt":0.25063645845414795,"score_spread":0.22952128714724845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403995316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003537234,0.0025367306,0.000011130503,0.0009413896,0.0023553122,0.00011472454,0.0001368807,0.00012176666,0.99342835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03365071,0.000761286,0.000056492256,0.0003241339,0.0008776054,0.0000026031123,0.000021997112,0.000045375302,0.9642598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987643,0.00001219621,0.0001584973,0.00028098378,0.00048569092,0.00029834517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994844,0.00007230739,0.00006788792,0.00019413732,0.00006300299,0.00011826323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018688144,0.00019210705,0.00020679888,0.00006231798,0.00029444994,0.00010084599,0.00027945312,0.00024171064,0.00042091572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029468305,0.00019481507,0.00007811076,0.000037008707,0.00013091357,0.000033650034,0.000060079397,0.0003422549,0.0001608579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.8545953e-7,0.0000015247834,0.0000771071,0.000046705536,0.000053890944,0.00015315993,0.0020838266,0.000005522934,0.0000018192233,0.92634654,0.070105135,0.0011242084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021420765,0.000004783335,0.00010729077,0.000097708835,0.000040171566,9.4228085e-7,0.001013659,0.000006794422,4.1576484e-7,0.04217107,0.95629627,0.00023945299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7448931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.947737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8861911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037038935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017471086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7944328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404024931","doi":"10.22215/cujs.v3i1.4846","title":"Fairness and Responsibility in Couples' Financial Discussions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton undergraduate journal of science.","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.018530621255774943,"score_gpt":0.30856961332594457,"score_spread":0.29003899207016964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404024931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821994,0.0012292495,0.00096525316,0.010225886,0.0021640828,0.00012188213,0.0000065845643,0.000023132365,0.0030645395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99728316,0.0014634279,0.00032786158,0.00011593258,0.00021300302,0.0000012959118,3.0283658e-7,0.0000074242043,0.0005875842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976934,0.00018204056,0.00045048396,0.00029940603,0.00091965456,0.00045498565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988756,0.00024217421,0.00011641614,0.00014729987,0.0002951262,0.00032336346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049522216,0.00012355865,0.00023989286,0.000577109,0.0006073253,0.00036960738,0.00045704813,0.00009253478,0.000012010636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00117584,0.00009103628,0.00008922797,0.0021174324,0.0026128185,0.00092570035,0.000082846775,0.00039818746,0.0000033872855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014749178,0.00029302426,0.15581758,0.00013140711,0.00003019682,0.0006662469,0.0891133,0.00054951175,0.015055575,0.7051528,0.0040813056,0.028961534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010370188,0.0003316478,0.53641665,0.00063833024,0.000060434573,0.00011701825,0.07850235,0.0033018317,0.0001853514,0.34921595,0.029531728,0.00066171295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026985744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012902003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38059902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004171048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031550075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9627038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404177705","doi":"10.1086/733932","title":"Identity Economics and Intrahousehold Bargaining","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Development and Cultural Change","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Economics; Neoclassical economics; Sociology; Labour economics; Positive economics; Public economics; Art","score_opus":0.06649634409985651,"score_gpt":0.27882062232290317,"score_spread":0.21232427822304667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404177705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819318,0.0021367657,0.000011211559,0.00051293,0.0008419129,0.00013441386,0.000008847642,0.000092006725,0.014330123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894718,0.007470791,0.0005254763,0.00026163834,0.00050782884,0.000024408766,0.00001617572,0.000011576773,0.0017103193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992793,0.000018239329,0.00016144685,0.00025902077,0.000039693183,0.00024229834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997766,0.00002264797,0.000027021624,0.000045386667,0.000010020913,0.00011829838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032573944,0.000116781004,0.00012592525,0.000050308023,0.00035646418,0.00048043637,0.000091615606,0.000078255354,0.0000515785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000055625023,0.00010945263,0.000021831647,0.00004323405,0.00010283794,0.0009543225,0.00006929904,0.000075724914,0.00006490452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006220295,0.000012299649,0.039297603,0.00006734509,0.00013529757,0.000011050795,0.3001078,0.000003569293,0.000018602195,0.559455,0.0017761951,0.099109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003268088,0.000020139478,0.115825854,0.000063581414,0.00002925407,0.000009602643,0.05569264,0.0008939396,0.00002530497,0.005982809,0.82044625,0.000683844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035341742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003913099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81867003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017200182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009655308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4632859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404200135","doi":"10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101195","title":"Beyond backlash: #MeToo and female unemployment trends","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Sciences & Humanities Open","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"American University of Sharjah","keywords":"Backlash; Unemployment; Economics; Psychology; Keynesian economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Economic growth","score_opus":0.09347975377504787,"score_gpt":0.3653744136865925,"score_spread":0.27189465991154466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404200135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23184773,0.0014367887,0.000015829428,0.0023791483,0.001399217,0.0002564551,0.000048100996,0.00013678282,0.76247996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92931825,0.00038039664,0.00025546158,0.00097526325,0.000896952,0.000042324693,0.0000109057,0.000018515717,0.06810194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977466,0.0001974953,0.00023551163,0.0005096538,0.0006918922,0.00061888515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995335,0.00013705237,0.00005782209,0.00010397162,0.00007010811,0.00009754525],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001699032,0.000177882,0.00023330323,0.00017856731,0.0041957702,0.003516568,0.0010725774,0.000111155656,0.0009788296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003157618,0.00016420038,0.00008171314,0.0009010447,0.0025616388,0.0011195109,0.00042284233,0.00016047971,0.00006160987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024286285,0.000029144678,0.0045366273,0.000015696874,0.000025229188,0.0000073738584,0.14115474,0.0000017733948,0.000014661156,0.83375436,0.008710532,0.011747407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024112694,0.0001702029,0.015559961,0.000040814874,0.000055956018,0.000001448641,0.32114145,0.00008900969,0.0000065284075,0.07840291,0.58374155,0.0005490216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071679354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020727655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7553515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017827336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004841459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404297725","doi":"10.1007/s10804-024-09500-y","title":"Integrating Intersectionality and Life Course Approaches: Three Women’s Lives","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Adult Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Life course approach; Intersectionality; Course (navigation); Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Developmental psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03648883713670326,"score_gpt":0.2843967846176609,"score_spread":0.24790794748095762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404297725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877161,0.00091077236,0.006247865,0.0010848821,0.0011530075,0.00007931301,0.0000020086209,0.0000264571,0.002779625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895562,0.00024401402,0.009398668,0.00021361653,0.00033636994,0.00000659609,8.332265e-7,0.000008572595,0.00023511017],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987392,0.000073356285,0.00040523414,0.0001339338,0.00042425934,0.00022405015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925494,0.000109335495,0.00013262703,0.00004652367,0.00023434883,0.0002222413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001181691,0.00010586524,0.0001704678,0.000099972545,0.00024493065,0.00019008941,0.0001471415,0.000060511527,0.000043845575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002496257,0.00008299542,0.00005088555,0.00018293803,0.0001265834,0.0002518612,0.000036761874,0.00027785412,0.0000053963604],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004450095,0.00018155605,0.10127812,0.00016195643,0.0005844609,0.000057111538,0.8148632,0.00003451604,0.000030240124,0.027120344,0.001323173,0.054320805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041791904,0.00013326202,0.17913991,0.0004966599,0.000051120427,0.000053609318,0.7838761,0.00078052905,0.000017131135,0.009609872,0.025069479,0.00035437662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006304101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009287832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077861786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036043223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013449664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3384455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404592109","doi":"10.1215/00703370-11646286","title":"Why Are So Many U.S. Mothers Becoming Their Family's Primary Economic Support?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Ethnic group; National Survey of Family Growth; Marital status; Demography; Demographic economics; Educational attainment; Psychology; Population; Economics; Family planning; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Research methodology","score_opus":0.017363789889105596,"score_gpt":0.25301949796839673,"score_spread":0.23565570807929115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404592109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8908139,0.0042008064,0.0016067529,0.0039763777,0.0035967818,0.0004188534,0.0002873908,0.0007057885,0.09439338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904272,0.0021372554,0.000495732,0.005693598,0.00057860685,0.000026469947,0.00004711275,0.00006020328,0.0005338242],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984347,0.000107706226,0.0002579725,0.00044487457,0.00020896632,0.0005457673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932563,0.00012275357,0.00007229766,0.0002692992,0.000029956376,0.00018005651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005225284,0.00021595994,0.00024831697,0.00034469645,0.00047685837,0.00040764295,0.00040834595,0.00018212455,0.00016215435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007442406,0.00020793584,0.00034692502,0.00048359775,0.00038425688,0.00030032793,0.000053073873,0.00022382388,0.00011332718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030377842,0.00018789577,0.5219963,0.0003113681,0.0008069973,0.00012943082,0.1102559,0.00019905165,0.0004663765,0.08238471,0.22714794,0.056083627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020605203,0.000034322416,0.12443914,0.000052326275,0.00005358995,0.000002116929,0.052918304,0.0006286126,0.0000059377307,0.009165643,0.812023,0.0004709599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011710319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017174608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58487505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013270884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025262884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84793776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404622555","doi":"10.1111/1475-5890.12396","title":"Tax credits and child outcomes: lessons from the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fiscal Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; Tax credit; Economics; Political science; Public economics; International economics","score_opus":0.058281194980187925,"score_gpt":0.31712035898587015,"score_spread":0.25883916400568224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404622555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9013711,0.0053950422,0.000024444145,0.09093542,0.00089531875,0.00016917665,0.0005371833,0.000054622335,0.0006176864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99073166,0.0052920883,0.000013240084,0.0029330894,0.00026280695,0.000013338166,0.00006605546,0.0000107544865,0.00067694526],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989068,0.00017426298,0.00013358424,0.00021032688,0.00030222212,0.00027279786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830353,0.0014047646,0.00003105155,0.0001244956,0.00006688075,0.00006930212],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029634679,0.00014012297,0.00016754166,0.00003280057,0.0015998571,0.00017802615,0.00019046248,0.00004782599,0.000006917848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030943286,0.00007053782,0.000024417835,0.00043767766,0.0005443832,0.000048032412,0.000162238,0.0002233839,0.0000013051872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010865891,0.000026369224,0.583475,0.000047562695,0.0011283307,0.000041765037,0.15368852,0.00011462039,0.0000010636152,0.052189033,0.20833847,0.0009384412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108639586,0.00000967914,0.43739638,0.000046924168,0.00006928171,5.315159e-7,0.1023737,0.00046517092,1.8017616e-7,0.0022019711,0.4572141,0.00011348017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91780967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9645856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2488756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000792452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009864704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404708825","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5033674","title":"Identification and Estimation of a First-Exposure Effect in Social Programs: Evidence Against a Welfare Trap","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Trap (plumbing); Welfare; Estimation; Social Welfare; Econometrics; Economics; Political science; Environmental science; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.01678724269924927,"score_gpt":0.30385105517499716,"score_spread":0.2870638124757479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404708825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98290557,0.011744503,0.0009810054,0.0028294723,0.0005178637,0.0007576246,0.000008216617,0.000049614384,0.00020616077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861573,0.013218182,0.000050560746,0.000009193296,0.00030833716,0.00006024044,0.000016942262,0.000024290972,0.0001549394],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968366,0.00046965227,0.00056987413,0.00038208324,0.0005841437,0.0011576648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991191,0.00009114186,0.00041883148,0.00014306979,0.00015985066,0.00006798641],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005479182,0.00022973027,0.0003647691,0.00028388025,0.00051002216,0.0002948823,0.0003828885,0.00042134625,0.0000024623928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029843257,0.00022514212,0.00018008595,0.0004476218,0.00019827149,0.0001823711,0.0001305611,0.002761379,0.0000024659562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022641821,0.00038147016,0.124199025,0.0030065195,0.00070491846,0.000025637695,0.11377964,0.0028961992,0.00020817542,0.24320808,0.00007336617,0.51129055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010136871,0.00069587445,0.07140489,0.0024127965,0.00048393192,0.000025899373,0.04930866,0.010331156,0.000012380185,0.8632553,0.00021509251,0.0008403331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076124293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024014382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6200472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001497817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025038142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404726055","doi":"10.1007/s42650-024-00086-0","title":"Declining Marriage Rates and The Collapse of Household Savings 1980–2014","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Economics; Demographic economics; Demography; Labour economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05239679324364625,"score_gpt":0.3291758471472332,"score_spread":0.2767790539035869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404726055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98890275,0.0063837133,0.000007750471,0.000935216,0.0008755543,0.00019794331,0.000022868984,0.000019189074,0.0026549916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979353,0.0014581551,0.00006695528,0.00017438347,0.00010586954,0.00001056168,0.000005126739,0.000007534375,0.00023610571],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992679,0.0001149898,0.00018762017,0.00013285819,0.00011210421,0.00018453394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947363,0.00030474964,0.000038112874,0.0000781137,0.00004239683,0.000063014944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009074406,0.000064560365,0.00014646727,0.00012993318,0.00030216746,0.0000457859,0.000075311575,0.000055705535,0.0000036065549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040913362,0.000051824478,0.000024316318,0.00033144487,0.0003523315,0.000086687985,0.000019918316,0.00007384932,0.0000011877087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065113513,0.0000022671268,0.7170467,0.000052028645,0.000043033786,0.000008940148,0.07211401,0.00010851196,0.0000025064207,0.20697568,0.0019483996,0.0016914378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045706242,0.0000144761325,0.87180007,0.0001735465,0.000051427032,0.000001000486,0.09029724,0.001427188,7.644917e-7,0.02604259,0.009554897,0.00017976339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33135608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86621726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5348612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021347233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001444743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6730965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404965084","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13050","title":"Temporary Aid for Needy Families as family policy for first time mothers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marriage and the Family","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"DHHS Office of the Secretary","keywords":"Population; Single mothers; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demography; Life course approach; Welfare reform; Cohort; Welfare; Demographic economics; Psychology; Medicine; Economics; Developmental psychology; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.016257045221711265,"score_gpt":0.2836709427180678,"score_spread":0.2674138974963565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404965084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9177589,0.016356545,0.0039467597,0.015084125,0.0026289748,0.0014151338,0.0002101064,0.00009366716,0.04250582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97423816,0.007463366,0.0009655937,0.0043777237,0.0036181137,0.000042546322,0.0000072944995,0.000068146604,0.0092190765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984256,0.00014759459,0.00047120271,0.00019038025,0.00037581177,0.00038938888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802864,0.0012429239,0.00020286636,0.00015644003,0.00019821602,0.00017089833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023507422,0.00019574704,0.00038964322,0.00025637378,0.0006546248,0.00032639928,0.0004216304,0.00015279677,0.000011383791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045807817,0.00012998076,0.00038290827,0.00034261006,0.00041984217,0.0002781434,0.0000424058,0.00020618801,0.000013448161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041200914,0.00030875942,0.0046035047,0.0008578036,0.0021999981,0.00012691709,0.17242776,0.0005369709,0.0029230947,0.48134688,0.29764417,0.03290406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046401164,0.00057333405,0.002662272,0.00023089074,0.0003020137,0.000025183992,0.09012268,0.003099751,0.000012792512,0.14383985,0.75407785,0.00041326106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010921453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000083420535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45643368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100822406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079718843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53004616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405059575","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4988437","title":"Home Production and Gender Gap in Structural Change","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Structural change; Economic geography; Business; Economics; Market economy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03630122079244308,"score_gpt":0.3048869470726419,"score_spread":0.26858572628019883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405059575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96481735,0.02693876,0.000055751163,0.0021325417,0.0040228246,0.00038880395,0.000008408682,0.00005664781,0.0015789183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95341974,0.042260453,0.000049851846,0.000055472257,0.0028123453,0.000018934845,0.000007585543,0.000030855845,0.0013447758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660236,0.00023724261,0.0002909846,0.00045691736,0.0004446064,0.001967874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946404,0.000016129095,0.00014756374,0.00016203149,0.000100771955,0.00010949333],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024314197,0.00023683587,0.00026397273,0.00030525806,0.00032036152,0.00024095227,0.0002969344,0.00034330887,0.000015186314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000077890065,0.00022194542,0.00009898619,0.00027308273,0.00014327653,0.00015424103,0.00023603656,0.004901367,0.000008782582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045372257,0.000048615148,0.06809635,0.0002896477,0.00037467713,0.00003365966,0.117842644,0.00016204175,0.000046968504,0.7868401,0.000111722795,0.026108216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118733915,0.000033712004,0.029659938,0.00006160351,0.000054094005,0.00008654468,0.022488037,0.00018339868,2.9767173e-7,0.94683045,0.0002059045,0.00027727755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001662933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039815545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15999037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020001906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035587384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405075128","doi":"10.1257/jel.20231648","title":"The Changing Identities of American Wives and Mothers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Literature","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Variety (cybernetics); Marriage market; Value (mathematics); Resource (disambiguation); Demographic economics; Economics; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.007819493995954985,"score_gpt":0.26389801967966686,"score_spread":0.25607852568371187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405075128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98053503,0.013157761,0.000033709366,0.001165387,0.00132413,0.000030350595,0.000012686967,0.0000048328616,0.0037361183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905102,0.005920608,0.00010937855,0.00007542324,0.00054348167,3.2190667e-7,3.0648653e-7,0.0000055795913,0.0028346686],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953544,0.000047660054,0.0001797831,0.000053841562,0.00006399266,0.00011928069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995977,0.00012857551,0.00014474797,0.000048152076,0.00003942077,0.000041351534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051049533,0.000049271326,0.00011548389,0.00010694942,0.00014478243,0.00036551576,0.00012785582,0.000029604056,0.000008273559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023040318,0.00003296868,0.00006908003,0.0001109525,0.00024368415,0.00028800702,0.000013984743,0.00012675645,0.000001024696],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034676075,0.000014785868,0.023975747,0.00009473071,0.00038013846,0.000033368346,0.63935614,0.00015312493,0.00022194344,0.31603065,0.006566616,0.013138113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045759356,0.0003033504,0.029946331,0.00082827674,0.00013176425,0.000110790184,0.6717832,0.0019464075,0.0000557726,0.08430633,0.20973022,0.00039992688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027028182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000078911886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23172432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049507802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010547715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3524677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405351882","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.348477","title":"Land, Wealth, and Taxation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Natural resource economics; Business","score_opus":0.01698445175007102,"score_gpt":0.2626213515829806,"score_spread":0.2456368998329096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405351882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6411797,0.005190766,0.01872944,0.030513389,0.0013510524,0.00080575596,0.00016754735,0.0005638622,0.3014985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603127,0.005737295,0.009280326,0.00016148276,0.00010245709,0.0000515003,0.00028247936,0.000041335094,0.024030404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467117,0.0035175413,0.00034889806,0.0006427488,0.00046404448,0.0003556051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671906,0.00070913474,0.000386486,0.0008601249,0.0011017786,0.00022339344],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005729484,0.00023100269,0.0002607508,0.0001708319,0.0006329131,0.00066500955,0.0006419089,0.00039642138,0.0000784344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013563127,0.0002492422,0.00011271393,0.00035215128,0.0003680909,0.000084524734,0.0009560635,0.00068292615,0.000070223075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006222786,0.0002300982,0.038684536,0.00045171243,0.000093208655,0.00000725236,0.1622147,0.000038629343,0.00015649473,0.754236,0.0026964378,0.04118471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015008253,0.0000015219089,0.14442003,0.005944258,0.00042804843,0.0000140916,0.016697798,0.038886,0.0009825142,0.49712873,0.29129905,0.0026971437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01377823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03650469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31913304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016089341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006532191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405419776","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5053889","title":"Discrimination and Daycare Choice: Evidence from a Randomized Survey","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Randomized controlled trial; Randomized experiment; Statistics; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.026478935735212466,"score_gpt":0.3196039619484107,"score_spread":0.2931250262131982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405419776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92878187,0.05238467,0.015374454,0.0015831504,0.0008998274,0.0002265324,0.000016675242,0.000063618165,0.0006691915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93811405,0.05972553,0.000052254258,0.000044269724,0.00048485037,0.000006281523,0.000012848528,0.000013589867,0.0015463462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970539,0.0009914556,0.00023735015,0.00023237072,0.00040665222,0.0010782727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810976,0.0014907554,0.00007203047,0.00008917628,0.00013480036,0.00010350887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075331805,0.00011894484,0.00024507762,0.00009238679,0.00045817162,0.000411367,0.00021973501,0.000098528275,0.000030039553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016424895,0.000096480624,0.00009949743,0.0002749825,0.00018983339,0.0005105293,0.000027613449,0.00093591673,0.000011817598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033628822,0.000093164155,0.24458516,0.00006346956,0.00109851,0.000025262043,0.11327911,0.00004297917,0.0003846941,0.5552174,0.00077595556,0.08107142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016536355,0.00013777133,0.18027304,0.00041797053,0.00039884335,0.00003318289,0.061091367,0.0041382774,0.0000049150717,0.73463094,0.0017453976,0.0005919633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013613505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.126398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17941351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006416728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025053916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405437691","doi":"10.46692/9781447351726.002","title":"The lives of young fathers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Geography; History","score_opus":0.017937833775763346,"score_gpt":0.28356753372049737,"score_spread":0.265629699944734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405437691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000033772136,0.0041942676,0.0000676524,0.00011878296,0.0015216125,0.0001241252,0.000016214408,0.00011805885,0.9938055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035085776,0.004187854,0.00013600485,0.000038365248,0.00030744792,0.0000038783082,0.0000013874525,0.000103566716,0.9917129],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993338,0.00005032417,0.00009073568,0.00012773223,0.00023236682,0.00016501982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999691,0.000040437902,0.000054942,0.00015966618,0.000020510633,0.00003342774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022377868,0.000085743,0.000106890104,0.000044636636,0.00008430178,0.00005312439,0.00028353016,0.0001343462,0.000799908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026605248,0.000052393516,0.00007613095,0.00013762832,0.00031385862,0.000010473296,0.00002934868,0.00009087213,0.00026280072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.3293044e-7,0.000009596141,0.0006049071,0.00003089994,0.000092486465,0.000001691517,0.031650722,2.0173349e-7,0.000002617126,0.1756232,0.7910136,0.0009694661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018743081,0.0000057266734,0.00005905356,0.000031925694,0.000020433305,8.716165e-8,0.08340388,0.0000052668074,2.45859e-7,0.0035877822,0.9127866,0.00008023754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008865711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038829565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17203541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020287744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010870888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405938489","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-01537-4_275-1","title":"The Seymour Sisters and Their Circles","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.02410485507154151,"score_gpt":0.2512378436741842,"score_spread":0.22713298860264272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405938489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029730232,0.004146051,0.00003892988,0.002065411,0.0009089235,0.00015951127,0.000030394098,0.00010775234,0.99224573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022432784,0.0077751535,0.00002258679,0.00039983256,0.00036172627,0.000003208282,0.0000049523082,0.000029844197,0.96896994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991589,0.000017433105,0.00014251645,0.0002512859,0.00020284134,0.00022702018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943995,0.0001870359,0.000045226418,0.00018760165,0.000050538052,0.00008966859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033712585,0.00017557158,0.00015344884,0.00003839329,0.0005923517,0.0003001698,0.00024360613,0.00023994941,0.000079396625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012665044,0.00010651422,0.00010522862,0.000025072879,0.00047816182,0.000037532413,0.00008589315,0.00022838678,0.00010442703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.405375e-7,0.000001187157,0.00003499656,0.000012826135,0.000053840486,0.000002654115,0.005774557,2.4535183e-7,0.0000014751324,0.98473436,0.002947326,0.006435622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023866412,0.000007757946,0.00012842762,0.000027317943,0.000022754686,8.196359e-7,0.014386518,0.000023686673,1.34176e-7,0.24865703,0.7365746,0.00014712273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003292764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007732984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7360773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054055767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012649415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45559502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405983338","doi":"10.12681/iccmi.7658","title":"Gender Equality in the Workplace: Women's Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Contemporary Marketing Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Gender equality; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.08034767603711376,"score_gpt":0.3531618730852226,"score_spread":0.27281419704810883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405983338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4805562,0.00035398925,0.0000034479249,0.017271813,0.0005699632,0.00022109914,0.000011529525,0.000047440026,0.5009645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925028,0.00022747112,0.000056372755,0.00047416586,0.0002778833,0.00004170413,0.0000014341866,0.000011251892,0.0064068963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980486,0.00017144809,0.00030376195,0.00032321186,0.00090856093,0.00024439816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869525,0.00046987177,0.00014844367,0.000097040065,0.0005484766,0.000040907053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005492419,0.00014773678,0.00016092543,0.00012527057,0.0001979853,0.0004463792,0.0012381395,0.00008550472,0.00015987568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013646546,0.00009763006,0.00008984056,0.00039484058,0.0002777115,0.00034845943,0.0001272809,0.00036785292,0.000008475854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013480664,0.00006821286,0.0441468,0.00005359243,0.000059904316,0.00000211549,0.11701877,0.0000015440842,0.00030632975,0.8335506,0.00446201,0.0001953496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027560387,0.00005048023,0.04842681,0.00069807196,0.000010728636,0.0000021062992,0.7992592,0.0015305377,0.00007303805,0.11375864,0.035618506,0.000296289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008043688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007883079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71979195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003066485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035920786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4304445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406519630","doi":"10.1016/s0029-7437(07)70641-9","title":"10.1016/s0029-7437(07)70641-9","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Demography; Gerontology; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.010890406681267355,"score_gpt":0.21802711513334058,"score_spread":0.20713670845207321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406519630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039563966,0.000063698186,0.0000035892128,0.0004865954,0.0000018097463,0.00019991753,0.000021204221,0.00021578703,0.995051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010840833,0.0000037060045,0.0001924155,0.00012933431,0.0003489335,0.000012115462,0.000010815206,0.000020321864,0.9981983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863815,0.0001012218,0.00016913694,0.00026055443,0.0003575946,0.00047333614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932057,0.000057944257,0.000029059283,0.0002551049,0.000075777876,0.00026153686],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003444376,0.00013390678,0.00016175467,0.000059218364,0.00037723058,0.00009286736,0.00038026203,0.00012264213,0.99456453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060181603,0.00013890628,0.00007242404,0.00037509872,0.000115888026,0.00013463137,0.00003208364,0.00011655044,0.99279404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021204556,0.00006850901,0.0000068650306,0.000003588611,0.000016664539,0.000004705735,0.0018010355,0.00007910495,0.000008846875,0.000092145274,0.8820613,0.11583601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013939689,0.000049607628,0.00042442634,0.0000063038424,0.000012883539,7.401272e-7,0.00014735755,0.000110689856,0.0000015679533,0.00011550947,0.99879384,0.00019769852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006563715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024642506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1167325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083291896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012600973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5664434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406676272","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5102879","title":"One Cohort at a Time: A New Perspective on the Declining Gender Pay Gap","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Cohort; Gender pay gap; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics; Political science; Demography; Sociology; Labour economics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.023524828580763275,"score_gpt":0.3044958611154781,"score_spread":0.28097103253471484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406676272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53972214,0.004754918,0.009130309,0.032569245,0.0009974061,0.0006970021,0.000004530734,0.0001313733,0.41199306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9253629,0.0051863287,0.00007196567,0.0015639432,0.00062086503,0.0000063380485,0.0000013729544,0.0000178079,0.06716849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967573,0.00034914035,0.00023396486,0.00026797573,0.00052492117,0.0018666608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906445,0.00028661994,0.00013080318,0.00020011223,0.00019146438,0.00012656375],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003124109,0.00015118322,0.00019818344,0.00010682438,0.0015004775,0.00012567741,0.00047516395,0.00012905199,0.00019753179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003948942,0.0001053039,0.00016031001,0.0004808765,0.0001532198,0.000097471864,0.000057748533,0.001727452,0.00014032755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004825804,0.00005980152,0.021310827,9.861413e-7,0.00039510935,0.0000017687513,0.009728109,0.000035993096,0.000059463953,0.9643223,0.002132089,0.0019052575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005953068,0.0001390775,0.025950113,0.000028211109,0.0001398185,0.000012739151,0.08220833,0.0001491163,0.00000732605,0.8823793,0.008167165,0.00022351717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012180723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008556503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3856407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004362836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008279403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406867534","doi":"10.1891/jfcp-2023-0148","title":"Comparing Financial Outcomes Among Households Headed by Women, Men, or Both Partners: The Gender Pay Gap Prevails","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Gender gap; Business; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.05584040044733674,"score_gpt":0.32451902149933254,"score_spread":0.2686786210519958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406867534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896824,0.0026300468,0.0037016284,0.00040427432,0.0012838945,0.00017432003,0.000012135182,0.000039092403,0.002072251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953077,0.0013113905,0.00019524024,0.0011742958,0.00057932816,0.0000077996665,0.0000020136529,0.000014368294,0.0014078649],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763715,0.00026221867,0.0006848006,0.00022448144,0.00057286076,0.00061850384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984501,0.0005371838,0.00045049793,0.00014642633,0.00024121844,0.00017454455],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003081586,0.00023390296,0.0005506272,0.00012295814,0.0013240996,0.0003096912,0.00039313547,0.00022539964,0.000009379528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009996425,0.0001457104,0.00012313265,0.0004190317,0.00025361168,0.0003227836,0.000036170222,0.0006791232,9.252138e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002473318,0.000078722995,0.83703786,0.000066931854,0.00008461905,0.000052208918,0.11205543,0.001096688,0.0000561344,0.0013247825,0.046330273,0.0015690053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023275993,0.00022983484,0.8074006,0.0006274232,0.00019872504,0.000015795735,0.066402726,0.0012488991,0.00001502719,0.0050111855,0.115870126,0.0006520874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032902538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002760808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069539845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015673775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010148105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406991643","doi":"10.1017/elo.2024.49","title":"Taxing data when the United States disagrees","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Open","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Università degli Studi di Trento","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.09540188759340276,"score_gpt":0.3398227007786668,"score_spread":0.244420813185264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406991643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042953152,0.00060512556,0.000719133,0.0078010233,0.0010422431,0.00049088267,0.00026862108,0.00024218675,0.9458776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649559,0.0006430101,0.0007032861,0.00399844,0.00072366087,0.0000041654043,0.00069949083,0.000062477426,0.02820956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982531,0.0007413185,0.00015473938,0.000325378,0.00024968563,0.00027578603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989602,0.00019475589,0.000031879117,0.0006903139,0.000039988943,0.00008287395],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00224411,0.00010093121,0.00008757967,0.000025567362,0.0008389292,0.0019624676,0.0031949275,0.000019292625,0.00019600715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008667068,0.00006714595,0.000023905832,0.00033759346,0.000336416,0.0005828009,0.0014937854,0.00016749962,0.00052654144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061408036,0.000032349784,0.0015078121,0.000017519113,0.000082305094,0.0000965079,0.08992816,0.00011807908,0.0000157898,0.77173734,0.13177145,0.0046865344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000617804,0.000009681433,0.0018025502,0.00003681786,0.000019199828,7.3725977e-7,0.017637309,0.0018385185,4.9241913e-7,0.0034567514,0.9750168,0.0001194177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018834194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010488708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92200273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028686265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073634976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407008630","doi":"10.1080/00220388.2025.2451868","title":"Employer and Employee Preferences for Worker Benefits: Evidence from a Matched Employer-Employee Survey in Bangladesh","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Development Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"RAND Corporation","keywords":"Employee engagement; Business; Employee research; Employee resource groups; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.11841041020913948,"score_gpt":0.3477061693250327,"score_spread":0.2292957591158932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407008630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771619,0.019978425,0.00046810074,0.0012044114,0.000665876,0.00040430663,0.000015444348,0.000020787344,0.00008074208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97760075,0.018265987,0.0033205173,0.00027748357,0.00010128046,0.000031631076,0.000002340401,0.000014327544,0.00038565585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974573,0.0005608635,0.0008096265,0.0002274443,0.00051154604,0.00043318587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950073,0.003726684,0.0003195261,0.00016201273,0.00070374156,0.00008078362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044312747,0.00023907353,0.0005861635,0.00020626873,0.0006496148,0.00010230297,0.00058900437,0.00010979963,0.000008038389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017301684,0.00016024546,0.00006405607,0.0005780746,0.0003252971,0.00033100662,0.0002116069,0.00024742563,0.0000022654779],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013293698,0.000033180222,0.9200248,0.00002404142,0.00036627066,0.000001360717,0.075579755,0.000031975058,0.000013596713,0.00008094107,0.001618928,0.0020921882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052428135,0.000052738636,0.95769286,0.00079092337,0.00008250017,5.574615e-7,0.035591833,0.0000012732578,0.000034953104,0.004484847,0.0005638866,0.00017935983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001369096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03805886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03998792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022806677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075185153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97949404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407085247","doi":"10.7256/2454-065x.2025.1.73218","title":"Tax policy and gender equality: the impact of the fiscal system on women and men","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Налоги и налогообложение","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiscal policy; Gender equality; Economics; Tax policy; Political science; Demographic economics; Public economics; Macroeconomics; Tax reform; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.030045018884543646,"score_gpt":0.33760206070280496,"score_spread":0.3075570418182613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407085247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8832911,0.00021254637,0.00007834951,0.0014826845,0.00020630438,0.00043693918,0.00008414432,0.000044851357,0.114163056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942538,0.00009334339,0.000013431827,0.0004268928,0.00018559888,0.000028175422,0.0000015185033,0.000012831139,0.004984422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978615,0.0006181407,0.00029511764,0.0002910656,0.00041073508,0.00052346056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868286,0.00048440453,0.00014193411,0.00046994395,0.000078039164,0.00014282491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013893564,0.00020260151,0.00029570903,0.000110717396,0.0008023332,0.00013175343,0.00044600252,0.00016588831,0.0000129315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035833637,0.00011320923,0.00011961276,0.00065234565,0.00061501213,0.00008788216,0.000211968,0.00023437427,0.000003887484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005759588,0.00008059135,0.35889155,0.000140086,0.00021298065,0.0000012912083,0.10377815,0.00006823785,0.00013575012,0.53176004,0.0028440997,0.0020296383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005859056,0.00007844765,0.9126928,0.000051749543,0.000039059563,0.0000026196149,0.0648255,0.0004871949,0.0000098767105,0.019097101,0.0019352583,0.00019452859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073891697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040336337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55380124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045971174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051435234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407101903","doi":"10.1215/00703370-11790542","title":"Nonresident Parent Wealth Among Children","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Demographic economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Educational attainment; Payment; Inequality; Bachelor; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Economics; Household income; Psychology; Demography; Geography; Sociology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.010819597548556275,"score_gpt":0.28313181799226883,"score_spread":0.27231222044371256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407101903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9397899,0.0006844756,0.0009620436,0.000589055,0.00073495135,0.000308062,0.000014785379,0.00013842128,0.05677832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745387,0.00089184265,0.00023543587,0.0005756111,0.00013018925,0.000018485289,0.000016642467,0.000007444344,0.00067049044],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986968,0.00014999579,0.00019169667,0.00025969613,0.0002999131,0.0004018996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994427,0.000056592402,0.000060120605,0.00022896925,0.00007179472,0.00013985558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043078078,0.00011421768,0.00014731484,0.00025842723,0.0005625963,0.00008897307,0.0003274531,0.000111826645,0.000035024605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039512255,0.00011410536,0.0001543348,0.0010694776,0.00026927795,0.00009243006,0.0000475092,0.00014085523,0.000015504418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031615684,0.000044187567,0.96249014,0.0000048263964,0.000044475735,0.0000010268619,0.0024125366,0.000008821534,0.0000020856148,0.029828755,0.0040292977,0.0011306925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016245285,0.000015113958,0.98541284,0.000017795226,0.000025680649,8.5594706e-8,0.004547191,0.000017295164,0.0000017509764,0.0043387646,0.0053432547,0.00011775799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050351974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007717638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05766397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041876054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015790455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76117456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407233433","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-75960-4_55","title":"Women’s Participation in Household Money Management and Financial Decision Making: Insights from a Developing Country","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Contributions to finance and accounting","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Finance; Economics","score_opus":0.019172029530585426,"score_gpt":0.2818351016174344,"score_spread":0.26266307208684897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407233433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95252,0.0078024324,0.0062726815,0.00037130763,0.0010327501,0.00093453383,0.00065736583,0.00012422857,0.0302847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871432,0.0042754808,0.00077738176,0.0005859067,0.00035606558,0.00011985622,0.000048611477,0.000028958413,0.0066645024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983053,0.000014968349,0.00041569865,0.00052983384,0.0002978019,0.00043639087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993641,0.00014624384,0.0001359734,0.0001589142,0.00013337049,0.00006141366],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035212366,0.00024722365,0.0003426599,0.00027767083,0.00060348085,0.00032811888,0.00014548095,0.00032995563,0.0000064193814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016391801,0.00026972604,0.000032950407,0.00023704511,0.000105078085,0.00025508142,0.00019273329,0.00028529964,0.000018592073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024464573,0.000014917214,0.0027312087,0.000052535368,0.000023759778,0.000055172994,0.0073085064,0.00007127925,0.0000033833642,0.97392076,0.00044249883,0.015351525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048489313,0.000021100785,0.11080278,0.0025286109,0.0000743619,6.6452014e-7,0.0014818446,0.00041937895,8.594944e-7,0.30531397,0.57821697,0.0006545638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023980094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030515708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66860676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006360546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020697946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407241699","doi":"10.15517/rce.v43i1.56476","title":"Brechas salariales de género en Costa Rica","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Ciencias Económicas","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Unemployment; Estimation; Wage; Productivity; Quantile regression; Quarter (Canadian coin); Econometric model; Econometric analysis; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Econometrics; Geography; Economic growth","score_opus":0.020972834750868818,"score_gpt":0.3056617976603617,"score_spread":0.2846889629094929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407241699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84331334,0.0017027631,0.011158387,0.0024989878,0.000555332,0.00048705627,0.000047937436,0.00026222752,0.13997395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907188,0.0013327972,0.0019472106,0.0020891118,0.00029287822,0.00002216147,0.000009957717,0.000018919804,0.003568164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976549,0.0004915385,0.00035480526,0.0004255663,0.00028293827,0.0007902191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986188,0.0004654129,0.00011959497,0.00039886474,0.00014815277,0.00024918432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022010063,0.00018845429,0.0003158176,0.0001711366,0.00068291486,0.00036312087,0.000764992,0.00027160722,0.00014932326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014439251,0.00020182705,0.00015298174,0.0008645783,0.00035865026,0.00017419884,0.000118817945,0.0002780108,0.00007928014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018140954,0.00015913413,0.15701194,0.00008289734,0.00007078711,0.000035242658,0.019120283,0.00005208018,0.0019517023,0.7973125,0.016394261,0.0077910544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008512071,0.00007487035,0.22765306,0.00017874375,0.00018365587,0.0000148934605,0.023686426,0.0017722769,0.00018360888,0.025595099,0.71894044,0.00086574256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00129638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094618916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77171737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090432254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017876842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8230268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407762898","doi":"10.1111/caje.70001","title":"Impact of income position information on perceived tax burden and preference for redistribution: An online survey","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Preference; Position (finance); Public economics; Business; Economics; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.13752665156027694,"score_gpt":0.2549843130345451,"score_spread":0.11745766147426817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407762898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938985,0.000027658902,0.00030127857,0.00062571006,0.00053975225,0.0002861292,0.0039252206,0.0000032988212,0.00039242432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989581,0.000105681385,0.00018935215,0.00011077503,0.00023141163,0.000005076521,0.00031327456,0.0000075306325,0.00007879161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998801,0.000119928336,0.00057026895,0.00014089153,0.000004291636,0.00036365486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978803,0.00017236956,0.00044073787,0.00016722227,0.00056794955,0.000771414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092817046,0.00013935613,0.00033697064,0.00047318154,0.00026483912,0.000113534974,0.00029052468,0.00018002324,0.000019080513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047027908,0.00016083498,0.000106190506,0.000115124894,0.00017428455,0.00071342394,0.000007852717,0.00016175148,5.6914485e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005411467,0.000042796226,0.36946097,0.00011748311,0.00036420248,0.0000069926164,0.026527464,0.0135637745,0.000037238846,0.57621455,0.0005835681,0.0125398375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077670306,0.00079840573,0.9468864,0.000110025496,0.00003572246,0.000010748518,0.0032569994,0.0038085058,0.0000028387694,0.042847462,0.0012517062,0.00021445322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57161134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5774255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024372041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004662369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82708424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408207183","doi":"10.1086/735618","title":"What Makes a Decision Fair? Relative Earnings, Gender, and Justifications for Couples’ Decision-Making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Accounting","score_opus":0.025571197166315826,"score_gpt":0.3595851915168749,"score_spread":0.33401399435055906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408207183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7184097,0.0023989498,0.27603072,0.0014480054,0.0010143725,0.00014614721,0.0000061858723,0.0000132235955,0.00053266936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615083,0.0052466216,0.032307792,0.00066474656,0.00014009488,0.000006834188,0.0000015169277,0.000009101326,0.00011499473],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866295,0.0002311547,0.0004341992,0.0002002613,0.0001897635,0.00028169953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943054,0.0044254316,0.00055005244,0.00011172204,0.0005145735,0.00009285311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012181993,0.00011055134,0.0003614695,0.00020365056,0.00071307266,0.00007456855,0.00026436968,0.00012495076,0.000013112633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019119035,0.00009904517,0.00012608485,0.00031373475,0.0016159213,0.0003185059,0.00004272001,0.00028517676,0.0000020687107],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033353738,0.00012055006,0.12100019,0.000016915135,0.0003734708,0.000011809141,0.18315059,0.00050043094,0.00016387623,0.22974297,0.0028999094,0.46168575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005464246,0.0003271351,0.17516732,0.00017384841,0.0001397959,0.000012123062,0.5776148,0.0004537823,7.887208e-7,0.23100166,0.014391887,0.00017044749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030900446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000546284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46151528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014084265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046845086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59539294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408233165","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-32257-0_134-1","title":"Energizing Harmony","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.035593567056268885,"score_gpt":0.2756071575278713,"score_spread":0.24001359047160242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408233165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000037151305,0.0016907601,0.00013113335,0.0007654616,0.002418224,0.00011325584,0.000023921486,0.00029491537,0.9945252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028377378,0.0026884072,0.00028124225,0.00067730044,0.0012535712,0.0000031406116,0.000018948469,0.00005198943,0.9921877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987573,0.000010010063,0.00018715487,0.00034011088,0.00041944202,0.00028599054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949336,0.000048333382,0.000048934555,0.00019816814,0.00007903208,0.00013219577],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023613026,0.00020570093,0.00020702727,0.00011157579,0.00024124698,0.0001575542,0.00027432916,0.0004343912,0.0019479308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011454506,0.00019248729,0.00016919347,0.00004165428,0.00017372472,0.000059814567,0.000078983416,0.00030998845,0.0015520891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.026984e-7,0.0000021665685,0.000015858788,0.0000139386575,0.000036904672,0.000020349966,0.002261506,0.0000016454771,0.0000033303193,0.9743699,0.022213798,0.0010601123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023890963,0.0000060685043,0.0000096689255,0.000036631453,0.000041017207,3.9209286e-7,0.0011220784,0.000022995358,4.601715e-7,0.19736844,0.8011535,0.00021488951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009069369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002941332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77893966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013811074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002548156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408766951","doi":"10.1111/dpr.70005","title":"Furthering a feminist fiscal agenda: Engendering tax and development","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Development Policy Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid; Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.054517656924277846,"score_gpt":0.3443310008822954,"score_spread":0.28981334395801756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408766951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17026354,0.26785904,0.012850836,0.021820337,0.002051386,0.0044848053,0.000032564833,0.00093881064,0.5196987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46218854,0.36780918,0.08543064,0.03847932,0.0007504821,0.0008276721,0.00008805801,0.00012602388,0.044300076],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980754,0.0001228171,0.00053835334,0.00037468935,0.00031816267,0.0005705388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994136,0.00006328044,0.00010649987,0.00018830129,0.000058053593,0.00017026707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001028154,0.00024043352,0.00038398095,0.00015558519,0.0008239727,0.000101974154,0.0003118548,0.00009938829,0.00005134334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022535054,0.00023682149,0.000048081452,0.00063814374,0.00015660583,0.00008697149,0.00021681617,0.00014998882,0.00005429257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075380717,0.00013667095,0.05019702,0.0064166114,0.00036209164,0.000025487212,0.11129557,0.0000036130875,0.00006760108,0.057928562,0.008740232,0.764819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014469886,0.0000031491454,0.025155853,0.0012527981,0.000015958207,0.0000021223807,0.0019580172,0.0000026867751,0.0000241678,0.000100677775,0.9710651,0.00027474097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016865111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006152583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9623249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004058402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019700048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408912701","doi":"10.1101/2025.03.25.25324432","title":"The health beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of males toward pregnancy planning and preconception health and care: a systematic review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pregnancy; Psychology; Health care; Medicine; Environmental health; Political science","score_opus":0.05673300811604659,"score_gpt":0.36439987576398825,"score_spread":0.30766686764794166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408912701","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027762236,0.96514267,0.0004426363,0.0031655547,0.00039542094,0.0025272039,0.000087427805,0.000039260256,0.0004376034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37701154,0.62184036,0.00035121708,0.00028631822,0.000031053056,0.00016151658,0.000024846855,0.000008081255,0.00028508564],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776363,0.0007388243,0.00061248895,0.0003453592,0.00028501963,0.00025468395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986839,0.00019607789,0.00054063124,0.00027384088,0.00015176077,0.00015373822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015024877,0.00016999761,0.000684215,0.000059016864,0.00062465115,0.00008791156,0.00021108543,0.00011006326,8.5218574e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038135654,0.0001292763,0.000058014328,0.00012868294,0.0003108325,0.000050657192,0.00025171074,0.00026018848,1.8588399e-7],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027632248,0.000022534156,0.1993753,0.6895857,0.00009824789,6.4264174e-7,0.10107119,0.0000028454626,3.867917e-7,0.007878738,0.00010906766,0.0018525684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027667778,0.00019029947,0.17865518,0.7519757,0.00022857929,0.000005066879,0.06606607,0.00007763796,1.7969406e-7,0.0016448803,0.00052096637,0.00035874193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011759984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027281302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3492493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112319256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008570072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52717346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408915325","doi":"10.1080/1081602x.2025.2469573","title":"Inequalities in North American fertility since 1921","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The History of the Family","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Fertility; Sociology; Demography; History; Geography; Political science; Mathematics; Population","score_opus":0.03460643503993667,"score_gpt":0.26730681663059536,"score_spread":0.2327003815906587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408915325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.954045,0.001208626,0.00004260534,0.0010455721,0.0017882527,0.00016957975,0.000011163073,0.000028188573,0.041660987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98074234,0.00010311471,0.000041296116,0.0015343985,0.000026448704,0.00000779971,8.7610397e-7,0.000004890621,0.017538855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858594,0.0005325113,0.00023176905,0.00014696964,0.00027648662,0.00022631635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991269,0.00019578071,0.00012905514,0.0004539355,0.000066540044,0.000027777332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075705163,0.00009149548,0.00019033166,0.000057366684,0.00023159181,0.0000073329934,0.0007886571,0.000032753687,0.000004627959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018993673,0.000062667335,0.00008762999,0.0005516077,0.0017715194,0.00005299565,0.0000967519,0.00017260892,0.000004543195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098329474,0.00016416547,0.76240474,0.000054895787,0.00003849932,0.0000010509747,0.18533112,0.0002537655,0.0003380063,0.031795356,0.016190192,0.0033298593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008698292,0.000008823486,0.8881087,0.000011080411,0.000011799885,1.7724073e-8,0.026523825,0.0000555138,0.0000013767949,0.0011479595,0.08397673,0.00006723003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039928433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07544198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15880731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008623773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007341685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96646476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409556700","doi":"10.1080/13533312.2025.2490670","title":"Where are the Fathers? Reincorporation, Family Relations and Gendered Parenthood in Colombia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Peacekeeping","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; VINNOVA; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Demographic economics; Criminology; Economics","score_opus":0.025562574556085658,"score_gpt":0.2957450104948616,"score_spread":0.27018243593877594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409556700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8380947,0.0018463477,0.0068314136,0.02808113,0.0016292466,0.0004547638,0.000029329725,0.000091348746,0.12294169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99408686,0.00079768884,0.00032386484,0.0006470573,0.00010261056,0.000027560925,0.000014399568,0.0000062980903,0.0039936337],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989602,0.00014947308,0.00024254304,0.00021254626,0.00026746778,0.00016778652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936897,0.00017651403,0.00011984881,0.00011822398,0.00018087949,0.000035597513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005222178,0.00008314012,0.000096170515,0.00012687668,0.0004426712,0.00016276784,0.00027455576,0.00008790986,0.000021584796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024021509,0.00008012761,0.000036706213,0.00033432656,0.00014654762,0.00021186996,0.00006711176,0.00017520093,0.000010190705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012083539,0.000056562934,0.831922,0.000009357783,0.000062213694,0.000005452762,0.016288945,0.0008267768,0.00014727475,0.1417593,0.006287732,0.0026222896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039488316,0.000006003096,0.8617948,0.000107272244,0.000012831389,6.205565e-7,0.07718079,0.003976935,0.0000016983948,0.016247382,0.040151443,0.00012534343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012416482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013626116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15599215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020397523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017503901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7603693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409676921","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/n95gm_v1","title":"American Exceptionalism Revisited: Tax Relief, Poverty Reduction, and the Politics of Child Tax Credits","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Exceptionalism; Tax credit; Politics; Poverty reduction; American exceptionalism; Economics; Direct tax; Political science; Tax reform; Indirect tax; Poverty; Public economics; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0135560690862212,"score_gpt":0.2730601113395709,"score_spread":0.2595040422533497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409676921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15262978,0.0052185627,0.009598009,0.1680691,0.0067680553,0.002971302,0.0029640323,0.0004043154,0.65137684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9350862,0.016736312,0.0012728437,0.0028946162,0.004279416,0.00004316997,0.00009128698,0.000041859614,0.03955433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975731,0.00043009347,0.0004692978,0.00047702165,0.0006723901,0.0003780958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980551,0.00018432239,0.0005279423,0.0005626173,0.00050376944,0.00016624133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009808938,0.0002454959,0.00048786346,0.00010378103,0.00060904986,0.00009218582,0.0005093444,0.00026757075,0.00015792256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042167754,0.00015380139,0.00017801738,0.00024439697,0.0024845882,0.00008879107,0.0003652487,0.00040843154,0.0000101869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022391836,0.000047885515,0.0030274354,0.000057077756,0.00010971576,5.9767433e-7,0.008570585,0.000012330331,0.0000095389505,0.89135057,0.0959899,0.0008019561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017845802,0.00009015172,0.09757865,0.00057084416,0.00034755078,0.00002015739,0.041970547,0.00013244283,0.000016872607,0.49250904,0.36377472,0.0012044314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011992632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003934758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7824564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013520272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037573295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410112073","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5207456","title":"The Myth of the Traditional Gender Gap? Evidence from a Crucial Case","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Gender gap; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Art; Literature; Economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.04110410321921161,"score_gpt":0.2964469526265565,"score_spread":0.2553428494073449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410112073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9454378,0.0146429865,0.013449364,0.01430565,0.002370471,0.00030516298,0.000031246553,0.00002450169,0.009432853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901,0.0072436114,0.000049335496,0.0004720701,0.00053128484,0.0000046522177,6.440307e-7,0.0000061461415,0.0015922211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975873,0.0004320862,0.00027038882,0.00014431882,0.00048302842,0.0010828691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989144,0.0005223791,0.0001602824,0.00018574133,0.00016281786,0.000054329044],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002320746,0.000097710006,0.00011767315,0.00003926255,0.0019147875,0.000102358885,0.0006211339,0.0000864498,0.000023511764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040041163,0.00006018299,0.00017129237,0.00036584897,0.0003571306,0.00015461518,0.00004131755,0.0010827233,0.0000030420592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038886967,0.00004993565,0.009337654,0.0000028708005,0.00020070294,0.000013237151,0.007824283,0.00006321414,0.000107055974,0.9738133,0.0013718196,0.007177055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030591944,0.000038223876,0.010693647,0.000040394643,0.000085185005,0.0001421002,0.048731703,0.00013729863,0.0000095332925,0.934977,0.0047340654,0.00010492338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002049662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022477759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04466227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006971246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007888969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410367080","doi":"10.5771/9781498572910","title":"Ethnicity, Gender, and Diversity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Lexington Books","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Ethnic group; Gender diversity; Sociology; Anthropology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.06348040501066263,"score_gpt":0.28272145063131876,"score_spread":0.21924104562065613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410367080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001101253,0.0008632139,0.0002716374,0.00027671104,0.00070273114,0.00031265398,0.00006296574,0.00023716985,0.99617165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015180068,0.0014931996,0.00029655593,0.002613002,0.0011009381,0.0000034997802,0.000049326194,0.00005280522,0.9792106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998023,0.00012105139,0.00021560768,0.00054491725,0.0006611042,0.00043436946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904513,0.000107238644,0.00016970669,0.00024280642,0.00009740993,0.0003377136],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034729467,0.00029604742,0.00039708777,0.00008423612,0.0012391498,0.00012117745,0.00050877617,0.0006416409,0.00010219335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062534724,0.0003377971,0.00014724303,0.00006414233,0.0005575905,0.00009972817,0.00088086014,0.00068823807,0.000083372186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027593,0.000035692367,0.00853299,0.00028630032,0.0002347074,0.00012320883,0.13066606,0.0000041397248,0.000015900403,0.69791085,0.15901196,0.003150622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031139256,0.000050898598,0.003918454,0.000052254924,0.00013913018,0.0000013668069,0.00366092,0.00003603867,0.0000013646563,0.11208219,0.8790981,0.0006478607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012045574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010713575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72008616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002952739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006692705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410431863","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-91371-6_14","title":"How Could a Gender Transformative Lens Foster the Integration of Sex/Gender into More Equitable Policy and Practice?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"B.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre; British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's Health","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Lens (geology); Gender studies; Through-the-lens metering; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0713362072871685,"score_gpt":0.3425841573234846,"score_spread":0.2712479500363161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410431863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000058713103,0.00077196956,0.016726376,0.013402552,0.00021515231,0.00078388135,0.00009725673,0.000046614936,0.9678975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08620765,0.0060858894,0.0018895589,0.006250399,0.0004038526,0.000034392626,0.00007564578,0.00004608108,0.89900655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813,0.0001537921,0.0003509075,0.0003329732,0.0006422877,0.00039002285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819374,0.00059579115,0.0002616317,0.00030673636,0.00055751967,0.00008455806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095433363,0.0003328665,0.00039416424,0.0002173383,0.0005315934,0.0002314801,0.00031253658,0.00054957025,0.000070065274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003109049,0.00023064595,0.00014559783,0.0001467733,0.00064003817,0.0007663537,0.0001067123,0.00047369607,0.000003817297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020126678,0.00001651265,0.000013137942,0.00008176885,0.00018255986,0.0000011518855,0.20785153,0.0000020342538,0.000035608155,0.78347605,0.0029533461,0.005366156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039349185,0.00007241508,0.000077607016,0.000077623576,0.000342185,0.000005052217,0.4756036,0.00020422829,0.000023855355,0.10167436,0.42106682,0.0004587524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017293089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033605979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6818017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023495483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009864583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9405469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410561023","doi":"10.1215/00703370-11958785","title":"The Effects of Extended Parental Benefits on Parents’ Employment and Earnings in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Parental leave; Demographic economics; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Economics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.005724822368554965,"score_gpt":0.23305428566595504,"score_spread":0.2273294632974001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410561023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99571544,0.0010244676,0.0000037911855,0.00019643326,0.00049294863,0.00021678481,0.000007022108,0.00000946406,0.0023336473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998593,0.0011285923,0.00001068402,0.00016624927,0.000010312697,0.000017821318,0.0000023019102,0.000003447041,0.00006761803],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999136,0.00010697312,0.00013753456,0.00014570799,0.00024173174,0.00023208337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994342,0.0003294875,0.00004899396,0.00010469212,0.000028745415,0.000053893098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001793857,0.00007810259,0.00011127793,0.00009090192,0.00028309727,0.000020226402,0.0001508763,0.00003656187,9.834447e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007636636,0.0000618844,0.00003693452,0.0005002674,0.00012017825,0.000023614171,0.000029244928,0.00009121279,1.7481621e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008663016,0.000025966618,0.9822443,0.0000139999665,0.000020548383,0.0000016147006,0.001399533,0.000008816054,0.000009749969,0.00871391,0.00022955568,0.0073233144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024480445,0.00003154994,0.9896559,0.000057573336,0.000009186204,3.7460573e-8,0.007754713,0.000017706208,0.000024277204,0.000451476,0.001693203,0.000059572423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6471368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9436659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2965291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007504034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023071672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35521293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410584843","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197801826.003.0011","title":"Gender and Public Policy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.042228698464002914,"score_gpt":0.29486079143718047,"score_spread":0.25263209297317757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410584843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003452447,0.0007990643,0.0002283756,0.0013925091,0.00034984676,0.000171327,0.000032797823,0.00011505998,0.9968765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007308584,0.0042530606,0.00029304338,0.0020164954,0.0005740222,0.0000029999164,0.000018915482,0.000018068156,0.9855148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988572,0.00002396375,0.00016592442,0.00030879138,0.00030749248,0.0003366167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999334,0.000065302585,0.000059044327,0.00021371453,0.00013849014,0.00018949958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020074016,0.0001898513,0.00021729856,0.0002690181,0.00035872808,0.00016441796,0.00023737868,0.00046446585,0.0005361586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007858247,0.00018242747,0.00007985174,0.00007640311,0.00030833654,0.000087170854,0.000113746435,0.00020963576,0.0000594096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.576581e-7,0.0000041622447,0.00054789317,0.00001457411,0.000035892186,0.0000018687468,0.0011222111,3.6925094e-8,2.1005764e-7,0.98024845,0.014171342,0.0038528712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007158462,0.0000052594537,0.0007054671,0.000008368564,0.000019751256,4.0942953e-7,0.0017429049,0.0000053695408,3.0013595e-8,0.20524612,0.7919973,0.00019740655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024824373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033643774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.777826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001297306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014685983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74391764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410869612","doi":"10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.106646","title":"Beverage Consumption Before and After the Implementation of Canada’s First Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Developments in Nutrition","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Canadian Cancer Society; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Center for African Studies; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Harvard University","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Sugar; Sugar consumption; Business; Economics; Agricultural economics; Public economics; Food science; Chemistry; Sociology","score_opus":0.01365741407881024,"score_gpt":0.29647995829694357,"score_spread":0.28282254421813335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410869612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99645704,0.0006530521,0.00020405735,0.0007352288,0.00093681953,0.00059411634,0.0000776057,0.000011150892,0.00033092935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974309,0.0019072044,0.00018056962,0.000104087456,0.00002839935,0.00012442876,0.00009069363,0.000004435298,0.00012924439],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988752,0.00009594703,0.00030968754,0.00018632125,0.00028815423,0.00024468004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996308,0.000052644984,0.000090130634,0.00008572164,0.000099118224,0.000041598767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033982575,0.00010362683,0.00012233334,0.00011095716,0.0003925564,0.000035595596,0.00011929299,0.000057448564,0.000029864937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030885087,0.00009582881,0.000019439063,0.00026341877,0.00010820511,0.00013897764,0.000046311234,0.00009967225,5.9047846e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020702193,0.00006338576,0.9790719,0.00022375867,0.000015157942,0.0000013714335,0.007909853,0.0000016128982,0.000008256067,0.0020182582,0.0012947108,0.009371028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007948236,0.000006890879,0.9798502,0.00020753747,0.000008348064,2.346592e-7,0.005894976,0.000012808089,0.000034073564,0.0016299107,0.01146332,0.000096929834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037960835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8668502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82888937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046399955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007031464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9684455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411015226","doi":"10.3386/w33822","title":"Tax Credits and Child Outcomes: Lessons from the U.S., U.K., and Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tax credit; Political science; Economics; Business; Public economics","score_opus":0.21435324052801413,"score_gpt":0.4778943579701565,"score_spread":0.26354111744214237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411015226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032918755,0.003632056,0.0000017719126,0.029485648,0.0015184865,0.0005965198,0.0027093638,0.000010214555,0.92912716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.928784,0.022910306,0.00006533051,0.0003293602,0.0016354746,0.000058732123,0.0006471725,0.000024203655,0.04554539],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714196,0.00025903666,0.0003632957,0.0004086123,0.0014928845,0.00033423392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99549025,0.003035371,0.0001615351,0.00021328154,0.00097491476,0.0001246707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036079118,0.00014843121,0.00035311456,0.00017209444,0.00076927117,0.00012676565,0.000510934,0.00029195822,0.00009207403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002438683,0.00012207244,0.00005550674,0.000121673,0.00059240015,0.00007838754,0.00021888809,0.00063029473,0.0000023391806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011548999,0.000031388598,0.16361703,0.00008698473,0.0004280217,0.0000043655077,0.001402025,0.000035059507,9.117175e-7,0.41538987,0.41727343,0.0017193742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038320155,0.00001675264,0.3835569,0.00015668126,0.00003765715,0.0000020180712,0.005939135,0.00009315942,7.3060113e-7,0.12995495,0.4795932,0.0002656367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9721843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98072934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89586526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001375403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020321988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9852319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411452260","doi":"10.61959/bcgo5222f","title":"Le budget de la famille moderne : les familles des militaires et des vétérans au Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.032010844156723596,"score_gpt":0.2860783936065612,"score_spread":0.25406754944983756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411452260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45673212,0.011284322,0.0029546358,0.00025868177,0.0012093867,0.0003680651,0.00036427053,0.00009932096,0.52672917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78224254,0.039482046,0.0025648188,0.00036689892,0.0003687499,0.00003947019,0.0001440001,0.00011801376,0.17467345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933175,0.0013267603,0.0009087917,0.0010743496,0.0015439206,0.001828703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962721,0.0013610604,0.0003405832,0.00069595856,0.0008130533,0.00051725167],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022447808,0.0009001188,0.0011332673,0.00016688203,0.0021564101,0.00019934453,0.001083938,0.0012533179,0.00024362234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064947305,0.0008898783,0.00046452583,0.00060893217,0.0038464435,0.0003363676,0.00024769476,0.0008471566,0.00004058866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003155273,0.0005473951,0.6904091,0.0018754989,0.0008464219,0.00019650704,0.06806105,0.0072090914,0.00016102643,0.17462493,0.019387841,0.03664957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062691496,0.00010607525,0.27671027,0.00047257272,0.00027329096,0.000058575883,0.20191772,0.002602807,0.000019415907,0.011135163,0.5043308,0.0017463788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48494294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003847994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06302897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411529304","doi":"10.1007/s42650-025-00092-w","title":"Births to Mexican Women in the First Two Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Geography; Demography; Virology; Medicine; Sociology; Outbreak; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.060533245974025915,"score_gpt":0.36629419917218226,"score_spread":0.3057609531981563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411529304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99136806,0.0001927322,0.0000039612482,0.004739731,0.00042046898,0.00030217404,0.000011799184,0.000006230988,0.0029548504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99454343,0.00009485848,0.000008200145,0.005059399,0.000030501466,0.000038249418,0.0000016000987,0.000002542601,0.00022118924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991809,0.00014551001,0.0001583802,0.00011334577,0.00013464062,0.0002672036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995506,0.0001553579,0.000034696324,0.00015068428,0.000028353896,0.00008034201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094574963,0.00004939221,0.0001094842,0.00016887991,0.00030451422,0.00001150283,0.0002546925,0.000038882732,0.000003331919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009721347,0.000039046412,0.00001992076,0.0010640493,0.00014879456,0.000024291048,0.000028749744,0.00007602558,8.962496e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014887302,0.0000029666242,0.8714525,0.000005573037,0.000006094114,8.978348e-7,0.11641449,0.00065544114,2.1412177e-7,0.010092884,0.00053711084,0.0008303087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011392145,0.0000037988223,0.86814725,0.000012891743,0.000002884904,7.8371016e-8,0.099582404,0.000019485395,1.8171757e-8,0.008309819,0.023767317,0.00004013192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6345088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36073896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018642133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044864637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4874853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411875984","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5331696","title":"Helping Those That Hide: Anticipated Stigmatization Drives Concealment and a Destructive Cycle of Debt","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.014425849650050185,"score_gpt":0.2996951768556109,"score_spread":0.28526932720556075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411875984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97434056,0.0029231163,0.020186368,0.00035073468,0.00019645382,0.00015009718,0.0000023107734,0.00001962608,0.0018307386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98876154,0.0106146615,0.00023542327,0.000055207856,0.000042240314,0.0000024917574,0.0000018916082,0.0000063102284,0.0002802522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983917,0.00019720226,0.00020529682,0.000133313,0.00022330442,0.0008491734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948835,0.00007828973,0.00016922038,0.00006732141,0.00013992665,0.000056913635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095410337,0.000092096954,0.00016412957,0.00011326291,0.00046156623,0.000056211506,0.00014315589,0.000073743635,0.000004842955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001083249,0.00008699462,0.00004038777,0.00030301366,0.00019506692,0.00019716681,0.000027169395,0.0003836286,4.997783e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023308225,0.000040518014,0.20962441,0.000018261715,0.00015442204,0.0000010477611,0.01663495,0.0001344915,0.00066779245,0.7643264,0.000007864534,0.008366516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010517251,0.00013460302,0.1106481,0.00021307364,0.00012138506,0.000013796815,0.21760884,0.0021805146,0.00025855828,0.667433,0.00011105048,0.00022529795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006667094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034352248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20097388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046712146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020090109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3563899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412072970","doi":"10.36510/learnland.vi29.1140","title":"The Messiness of Being Human: A Father-Daughter Performative Dialogue","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LEARNing Landscapes","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Daughter; Performative utterance; Sociology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.011337934553423891,"score_gpt":0.27835210201960514,"score_spread":0.26701416746618123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412072970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8886271,0.00024986974,0.0006072298,0.00067025656,0.00027920125,0.00010055095,0.000001440908,0.000058001122,0.109406315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99258524,0.00016613746,0.00005794896,0.00006437126,0.000100967445,0.000009722003,0.0000069184457,0.000006526391,0.0070021646],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989085,0.00033792984,0.00018325365,0.000119778764,0.00020074687,0.0002497463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923813,0.00039763836,0.000102377344,0.000111633315,0.000121743695,0.000028489432],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008247783,0.00008745377,0.00014698759,0.000057473186,0.0017815812,0.00010005938,0.000264975,0.00008018845,0.000027045904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002619071,0.000059831982,0.000061434235,0.00029874642,0.00015580055,0.00010461643,0.000053507974,0.00026438868,0.000007030873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020145588,0.000045813515,0.6279705,0.0000551552,0.00010058196,0.0000016958726,0.21118775,0.00070523814,0.00041982462,0.15018363,0.0005908671,0.008718802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011199083,0.00010463615,0.4576925,0.00028274042,0.000109318185,6.4345426e-7,0.30035272,0.0038910715,0.00017754584,0.018529812,0.2172639,0.0004751749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041061215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012580117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21667303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026217123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008711399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412310290","doi":"","title":"Female Labor Force Participation in the United States: Impact of Income Taxes During 1990-2000","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Agricultural economics","score_opus":0.02575887900010842,"score_gpt":0.3285643173340298,"score_spread":0.3028054383339214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412310290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99765193,0.000017927747,0.00021212088,0.00028932246,0.000044812936,0.00016862045,0.000043498658,0.000040387837,0.0015314008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984681,0.00017706653,0.000043897195,0.0000817649,0.000036058318,0.000012399217,0.000005890138,0.000007789506,0.0011670553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896085,0.00021040242,0.00020009319,0.000108259715,0.00023348995,0.00028688196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940485,0.00022421572,0.000074522286,0.00015600944,0.00008820695,0.000052211777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005384355,0.000074702315,0.000103692044,0.000106861145,0.00011444889,0.000026336427,0.00020128702,0.000054568663,0.000080143305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013861083,0.000038680097,0.000045149147,0.00069287716,0.0001309717,0.00018021127,0.000018972978,0.000044663426,0.000007746334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017351766,0.000059861944,0.9216071,0.000008135519,0.0000119194665,0.000001225426,0.07177915,0.0005341614,0.0005604095,0.0052444558,0.000029458983,0.00014681122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003517264,0.00004963707,0.9687046,0.000020512847,0.0000058144365,1.1290613e-7,0.028793184,0.00033352635,0.00007724491,0.0013804861,0.00020171751,0.00008146707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024629308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016898755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04709751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014178052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014022275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98186576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412553905","doi":"10.3390/jrfm18080407","title":"Economic Attitudes and Financial Decisions Among Welfare Recipients: Considerations for Workforce Policy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Welfare; Economic welfare; Business; Public economics; Economics; Labour economics; Finance; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.01633690804493945,"score_gpt":0.29338905468352655,"score_spread":0.2770521466385871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412553905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94508386,0.0010939778,0.04396162,0.0021414314,0.0016706969,0.0005625329,0.00009498666,0.000015538168,0.005375342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98368096,0.01060799,0.00439606,0.00031319333,0.0004033485,0.000012473963,0.0000015774657,0.0000057988077,0.00057857705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990278,0.000057896723,0.00038813986,0.00016379263,0.00012896238,0.00023343657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999211,0.00025871303,0.000210526,0.00009485589,0.00012190766,0.00010297096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064666336,0.000110686735,0.00023190024,0.0003096477,0.001180099,0.00015743083,0.00012073413,0.00009638614,0.000008471414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009572961,0.00010579047,0.00009245349,0.00018705773,0.00018759727,0.000209918,0.00007422959,0.00013347335,7.4183157e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005136057,0.000058747388,0.20820135,0.000017358941,0.000025779489,0.0000073978917,0.0029587385,0.00023058394,3.449349e-7,0.69637746,0.0038777082,0.08819315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007819481,0.000057062214,0.76266074,0.00009689641,0.00008515255,0.0000011436789,0.0021968135,0.000039555263,3.4252403e-7,0.081388205,0.15258276,0.00010940394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004345375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050612474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6149893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013451834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024687313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9076487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412633223","doi":"10.1037/apl0001310","title":"Disrupted selves in transition: How women navigate fertility treatments in the context of work.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Psychology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Psychology; Transition (genetics); Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Fertility; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.020825558423956628,"score_gpt":0.33176603939019655,"score_spread":0.31094048096623994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412633223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98017806,0.00014614261,0.00013389312,0.005701089,0.00027271282,0.00019630324,0.000004745873,0.0000036954257,0.0133633325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982274,0.00021350666,0.000094540796,0.0013510126,0.000031600845,0.000013832253,0.0000013762393,0.0000033674428,0.000063332736],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880147,0.0002550058,0.00038323435,0.00012581503,0.00018724895,0.00024725226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994381,0.00013812385,0.00018374542,0.00013761423,0.00005967988,0.000042713455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011742519,0.00008977216,0.00030124246,0.00015285784,0.000065685716,0.00001839995,0.00030671826,0.00013865075,0.00001978551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016946822,0.000065519605,0.00006447886,0.00073027087,0.00023802431,0.00005748448,0.000006760399,0.00027533848,0.0000010615762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036613964,0.0024613726,0.18018703,0.000046395635,0.00030527805,0.00009015647,0.7511211,0.00010137137,0.0015124417,0.016417416,0.0012860268,0.04280999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026057027,0.00011020131,0.833125,0.000036369984,0.000022251137,0.0000020404668,0.14583045,0.000004665485,0.000014153811,0.01625004,0.0019248421,0.00007430996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000558438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038528017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65293795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012527096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102135215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2671812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412654831","doi":"10.1215/00703370-12159081","title":"Whose Parents Matter? Intergenerational Transmission of Earnings Arrangements in Different-Sex Couples: A Research Note","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Demographic economics; Demography; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.030175144536239158,"score_gpt":0.35080546576859517,"score_spread":0.320630321232356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412654831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.987293,0.00026564102,0.0047542932,0.0005511859,0.00026294304,0.0002769343,0.00001666032,0.000019402578,0.0065599307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99827117,0.0003927456,0.00027876603,0.00010079756,0.00004308227,0.00003120668,0.00002669596,0.000007569682,0.00084794126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981766,0.00033090904,0.000304094,0.00025810485,0.0005788321,0.0003514822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946016,0.00012038202,0.00005133384,0.00014259288,0.00014568836,0.00007982472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006178702,0.00010795825,0.0001844252,0.00066812313,0.00027094642,0.000044734872,0.00031334348,0.000116993266,0.00010766265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000366435,0.00009971429,0.00010690711,0.0012708626,0.00025401163,0.0000859475,0.00004338757,0.00022967024,0.0000070011165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024603552,0.00018159306,0.9804151,0.000041961754,0.000025820445,0.0000010860444,0.011407603,0.000022532085,0.0020590785,0.0014117593,0.0015768249,0.0028320476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000552903,0.000030497307,0.97980976,0.00015471976,0.0000100494,3.501095e-8,0.008464437,0.0007699643,0.00012049132,0.002585002,0.0073926896,0.00010947501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091409555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082650833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0109781865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050597366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000098243334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40662307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412719515","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5366137","title":"The Hidden Tradeoffs in Promoting Impure Public Goods: Evidence from a Field Experiment with Farmers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Field (mathematics); Business; Environmental economics; Public economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02390106673781757,"score_gpt":0.3006105188651233,"score_spread":0.27670945212730574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412719515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.835725,0.08704545,0.0075990898,0.05748463,0.002286579,0.0017110162,0.000019894034,0.00013813512,0.00799019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489702,0.04868788,0.00039747852,0.00027962818,0.00059771346,0.00007016785,0.000005467403,0.000021405838,0.0009700401],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944039,0.0007979077,0.00053163106,0.000530847,0.00086061377,0.0028751083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981545,0.00070338405,0.00040867017,0.00039417564,0.00018151928,0.00015772814],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00443351,0.00032967646,0.0003619195,0.00015002381,0.0010449728,0.0006779546,0.0015587328,0.00040013122,0.000014271395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068498973,0.00023787498,0.00018016841,0.00043577343,0.00017661293,0.00027870922,0.0002695573,0.005443393,0.0000021478636],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004466368,0.00054234214,0.1267385,0.00009383036,0.002238422,0.000080522965,0.34814033,0.00031839334,0.00015873952,0.27388114,0.0005668483,0.24679428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011043561,0.00060711126,0.0033054706,0.0015604434,0.00019948772,0.000034417055,0.71416295,0.0006365369,0.00003620944,0.27043617,0.0069088195,0.0010080216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010652756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08680176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36602262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030496994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018531095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412953115","doi":"10.56687/9781847421715-004","title":"One Introduction: the construction of teenage pregnancy as a social problem","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Policy Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pregnancy; Psychology; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.036220966735180216,"score_gpt":0.2813854896014405,"score_spread":0.24516452286626028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412953115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000080939324,0.00050789485,0.00009655364,0.0012182212,0.0004638428,0.0008589611,0.00011549269,0.00010808879,0.99655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058214697,0.00043691442,0.00039612685,0.0001150261,0.008875954,0.00006450772,0.000031078787,0.00006470511,0.9841942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798757,0.00011665322,0.00046591752,0.00038786686,0.00064335734,0.00039864957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987082,0.00005374385,0.0005361406,0.00035901996,0.00027254305,0.000070363494],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002361516,0.00027890244,0.00039546032,0.00014333503,0.0006992366,0.00008580259,0.00044541727,0.0005159304,0.000041390645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003431974,0.00025629147,0.0002088114,0.000032000582,0.0015679394,0.00006416438,0.00011195274,0.00043525972,0.000010941615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009473023,0.000015973386,0.000008626825,0.00008809044,0.00009579872,9.694529e-7,0.007962207,0.000004042447,0.000016191108,0.97847754,0.0037697258,0.009551371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023653898,0.000036977177,0.000106387015,0.00012379616,0.00015892822,0.000003816892,0.00040527654,0.0000025504332,0.00003150351,0.27722698,0.7213557,0.00031153468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014532078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009984672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.717586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018231843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006478395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413113170","doi":"10.1007/s10508-025-03265-5","title":"Correction: Sexual and Gender Diversity in Thailand: Associations with Recalled Childhood Sex-Typed Behavior and Adulthood Occupational Preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; General Electric (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sexual behavior; Diversity (politics); Public health; Developmental psychology; Gender diversity; Sexual orientation; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.03653126918210954,"score_gpt":0.29612370366000895,"score_spread":0.2595924344778994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413113170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9810738,0.0004079463,0.00004240497,0.000047941856,0.0031769737,0.00096812466,0.0011407984,0.00006382451,0.013078185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9216598,0.0010944951,0.0011024408,0.00006609506,0.00043551158,0.00018024015,0.0019255299,0.00003607937,0.073499784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752516,0.00033757254,0.00040215734,0.0006847021,0.00064157974,0.00040885658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873465,0.0004122366,0.00032542582,0.00022950102,0.00012634433,0.00017185458],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027449953,0.00034453796,0.0005561532,0.00036138587,0.00083773216,0.00008287266,0.00033553783,0.00044419838,0.000031992415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013141635,0.00033496128,0.000039394876,0.00031608602,0.0005677261,0.00019378243,0.0003561551,0.0008018673,7.9203033e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051298422,0.00053388934,0.93602455,0.00005922037,0.0000762765,0.000008981934,0.05234249,0.00000211069,0.000008176958,0.00016495817,0.003527776,0.0072002555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082966423,0.00029212027,0.969232,0.00005262839,0.00052076223,0.0000029404434,0.028243484,0.000022521497,6.889262e-7,0.00018763644,0.00025707617,0.00035845465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045574373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02650025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0604216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007578198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010456258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413510589","doi":"10.64628/aam.ncnchhtsk","title":"Federal election 2021: Gender-based violence is an issue we should all prioritize","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Computer security; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05968942290983216,"score_gpt":0.33429925361647356,"score_spread":0.2746098307066414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413510589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79680294,0.0011880619,0.022652242,0.015446255,0.002919192,0.0005537291,0.00004210203,0.0005001063,0.15989536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713425,0.0021994323,0.004867558,0.008181448,0.00084679096,0.00001483526,0.000040319774,0.0000250503,0.012482036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801195,0.00024790523,0.00021133998,0.00047468813,0.0005333007,0.0005208458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909943,0.000059025122,0.000049789804,0.00027938912,0.0002745429,0.00023779357],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000361007,0.00016169332,0.000174774,0.000051818588,0.00062023045,0.0002718,0.00022822953,0.00022793832,0.0024269647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006709068,0.0001689863,0.00009468888,0.00046043503,0.00010366387,0.0002754107,0.000030482475,0.00020463463,0.00012181256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018220732,0.0033748006,0.346072,0.00032664172,0.0004472012,0.00040404306,0.16638377,0.0012514777,0.04067211,0.17043239,0.10593373,0.16451964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002342336,0.00046356051,0.06927523,0.0001243473,0.00015687959,0.0000134472075,0.19819002,0.027661001,0.010222258,0.040800657,0.64835256,0.002397685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037120956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010051889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54241884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001541681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000693043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99848497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413607137","doi":"10.64628/aam.mndasrcfu","title":"The motherhood pay gap: Why women’s earnings decline after having children","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Gender pay gap; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economics; Psychology; Accounting; Wage","score_opus":0.012473462575856496,"score_gpt":0.27025449852336403,"score_spread":0.2577810359475075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413607137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9238297,0.0013068685,0.0008477675,0.009408662,0.003188252,0.0007280853,0.00006766383,0.00051714556,0.06010589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94823617,0.0017640704,0.00043317853,0.0022577574,0.0011813019,0.0002551936,0.00001762216,0.00006984886,0.045784887],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971527,0.00026630124,0.00038956903,0.00067249074,0.00070586783,0.00081308547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987515,0.00017404048,0.00014283397,0.0005806073,0.00013544703,0.0002155269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017664979,0.00034225846,0.0003086696,0.00009188883,0.0006708562,0.0009804133,0.0009794772,0.00047037922,0.0006554915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018301609,0.00020508107,0.00022973325,0.00023840523,0.00031787995,0.00005727582,0.0016018767,0.0012972648,0.00025318176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046449564,0.00017123074,0.67485714,0.00014231351,0.00075256435,0.00003078979,0.25946894,0.0003466009,0.00001223428,0.02771478,0.017592818,0.018864106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035369187,0.000059125632,0.5432792,0.00023045427,0.00016908233,0.0000030923995,0.056320347,0.00085042446,0.0000023264681,0.21064018,0.18670805,0.0013840394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006586459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010137486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2031486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038265073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005462312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413621265","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-32257-0_134-2","title":"Energizing Harmony","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.029607475537995687,"score_gpt":0.27260481981111345,"score_spread":0.24299734427311775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413621265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018289918,0.00058226875,0.00067128276,0.00065437466,0.0014305562,0.00013177538,0.00002044474,0.00017020956,0.9963208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011210231,0.002498026,0.00068469567,0.0014414219,0.0005489838,0.0000031197658,0.00002211147,0.00002001955,0.99366057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988544,0.000020094654,0.00019361147,0.00029951314,0.00035523242,0.00027713482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938565,0.00008220274,0.00007238094,0.00023059886,0.00012509828,0.0001040373],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023034021,0.00019205885,0.00023238888,0.00011839514,0.00036180648,0.00008414122,0.00033402405,0.00045585344,0.0013890547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031649237,0.000192617,0.00014672351,0.00004403774,0.00015892208,0.00005612491,0.000078802914,0.00023900442,0.0001750673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.266652e-7,0.0000032796806,0.000068394154,0.000009158188,0.000029117728,0.0000051301677,0.0010276587,0.0000014093929,0.0000017705963,0.94853103,0.046938054,0.0033841708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000548812,0.000005334035,0.000044935096,0.00003836827,0.00003447018,1.0391182e-7,0.0008973664,0.000017364575,6.810041e-7,0.058968555,0.9397147,0.00022321477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012939245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035013442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89277667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013389192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004980402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413725372","doi":"10.64628/aam.rrtwaqse7","title":"Higher prices, reduced hours: Restaurants &amp; minimum wage hikes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Minimum wage; Economics; Agricultural economics; Wage; Business; Labour economics; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.05552829986982182,"score_gpt":0.32708161748772346,"score_spread":0.27155331761790164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413725372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65879023,0.00045181115,0.00037519945,0.0014825299,0.0072801835,0.00062859774,0.00008880451,0.00046264924,0.33043995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8441454,0.0020067254,0.011473636,0.00083922636,0.0039492617,0.00007009202,0.00020864891,0.000099635414,0.13720736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962993,0.00032658165,0.0005166955,0.0009902052,0.00095334445,0.00091386994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976709,0.0001533724,0.0003446677,0.0010422075,0.0004275997,0.00036129323],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010697896,0.00045650627,0.0005318189,0.00018547279,0.00056588516,0.0004131828,0.0013436544,0.0010461791,0.0017258668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020124386,0.00042070047,0.00024007827,0.00035909165,0.00065604114,0.00017045667,0.0006298146,0.0006371521,0.00045567835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016633446,0.00105834,0.07084558,0.0004331117,0.0008144498,0.000072448645,0.1505538,0.00008051155,0.0015971325,0.044555347,0.7240868,0.005736125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010589508,0.00010288248,0.26776403,0.00050128694,0.00030390418,0.0000019531765,0.023984943,0.00006832703,0.000068516216,0.03741403,0.6657747,0.0029564695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010204462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0120912185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19691843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029262903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009414275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413879684","doi":"10.1001/amajethics.2025.642","title":"How Should Clinicians Follow Up About Nonresponses to Mandatory SDoH Screening Questions?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The AMA Journal of Ethic","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Medicine; Family medicine; Psychology","score_opus":0.09257522559946697,"score_gpt":0.39337778509780935,"score_spread":0.3008025594983424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413879684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82567304,0.0030324992,0.04242431,0.12013808,0.0034704972,0.00024942533,0.000012848523,0.000044089546,0.004955191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977287,0.0013218718,0.0016302852,0.0067475364,0.000544408,0.000003009467,4.6773957e-7,0.00001197444,0.012453435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974259,0.0011488359,0.00038210594,0.00013479557,0.00058288703,0.00032547407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973508,0.0014539555,0.00025680716,0.0002516158,0.0005327321,0.00015407098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006550301,0.00012466156,0.00026351577,0.00021917793,0.0008985291,0.00027472916,0.0007474927,0.00020819086,0.000021376705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034443312,0.000091097325,0.00020441374,0.0005566476,0.00031610654,0.00022030344,0.000073680276,0.00091660646,0.000010038833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002301492,0.00042509034,0.21646881,0.00012328548,0.001348187,0.00022810845,0.24215779,0.003086496,0.003495381,0.3332062,0.0991752,0.097983964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018448128,0.0004535429,0.42524102,0.0013154553,0.00043586383,0.000024172368,0.14073706,0.00021660268,0.00010705457,0.041400168,0.38767815,0.00054610765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002447641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021247708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29180604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008532405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086333125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69108504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413906628","doi":"10.70121/001c.143862","title":"For Better or For Worse? The Dual Economic Impact of the Industrial Revolution on Women","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly review .","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Doug Bragg Enterprises (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Industrial Revolution; Economics; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.06284970195541344,"score_gpt":0.358034971182601,"score_spread":0.2951852692271876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413906628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9626072,0.009898331,0.00022874438,0.014786905,0.002600573,0.0056757117,0.00036372957,0.000031049978,0.003807748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9497189,0.02016815,0.00033633376,0.011737763,0.0021218946,0.0013761697,0.000030283954,0.000039262864,0.014471232],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883896,0.00028129338,0.00029773,0.00017378158,0.00013010098,0.0002781545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990083,0.00034555086,0.00017366362,0.00031630407,0.00011477066,0.00004143995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027508934,0.00010204018,0.00024497465,0.00003071808,0.0004997145,0.00011559261,0.0004148107,0.00011727503,0.000044275006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013027748,0.00005135401,0.00027720767,0.0002578927,0.000113026945,0.0002725705,0.00003847913,0.00021840176,0.000007306075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075967103,0.00019842443,0.107862964,0.0011640522,0.0007466167,3.640729e-7,0.01020134,0.000107718784,0.00011464042,0.113950185,0.64202267,0.122871354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016079005,0.00037506476,0.05920723,0.0012293346,0.00022588209,3.8854725e-7,0.0023990353,0.00007203287,0.0000052749433,0.012856217,0.9217726,0.00024904998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019426357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002614456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27974993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006191025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010651213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38434505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413962384","doi":"10.54254/2753-7048/2025.nd26533","title":"Redesign of the Trivers-Willard Hypothesis Measurement Tool","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering","score_opus":0.04405721547835222,"score_gpt":0.3193881874069175,"score_spread":0.27533097192856526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413962384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85358256,0.00545532,0.016636288,0.0786109,0.0102567775,0.00073082006,0.000008366049,0.000040003986,0.034678947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941112,0.00085358415,0.0007966394,0.004041268,0.00011473995,0.000022692175,0.0000018867798,0.00000337644,0.000054661694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987842,0.00043315004,0.00018975096,0.0001930422,0.00021287793,0.00018698892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898547,0.00047310855,0.00008062701,0.00023272952,0.00018767723,0.00004039188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010340281,0.00007772916,0.00012548153,0.00015930324,0.00017701442,0.000021992735,0.00025739465,0.00021389926,0.000075746066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037959372,0.000060321643,0.000036217752,0.00071432494,0.00032125716,0.000052865933,0.000015993179,0.00016459603,0.000001489887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025100315,0.0003582385,0.615148,0.000027722186,0.00004847698,1.7779496e-7,0.030378597,0.000007903049,0.0005050755,0.040896375,0.0056444327,0.3069599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036047117,0.000013725365,0.83292204,0.000031968146,0.000023902825,6.5269666e-7,0.0031218256,0.000004806472,0.00006147915,0.12273639,0.0406164,0.00010634314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019542327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002208649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30685356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006909321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009753528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45443654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414082831","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2504747122","title":"Interventions to bolster benefits take-up: Assessing intensity, framing, and targeting of government outreach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association for Co-operative Education","funders":"Department of Social Services, Australian Government; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Outreach; Psychological intervention; Government (linguistics); Poverty; Compliance (psychology); Safety net; Test (biology)","score_opus":0.05686227878589329,"score_gpt":0.3561117007627253,"score_spread":0.299249421976832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414082831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.980393,0.0002346771,0.000028549168,0.0037959807,0.00009155702,0.00016255259,0.000018122471,0.000007540172,0.015268006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969055,0.000048392663,0.0020717995,0.00031886256,0.000036027635,0.0000040481586,8.6062194e-8,0.0000020961256,0.00061317254],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981901,0.000011164246,0.0003517406,0.0002000342,0.0010918162,0.00015515523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909973,0.000117905685,0.0003354481,0.000007658247,0.0004004908,0.000038752805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021242304,0.000072260766,0.00015684447,0.000117975615,0.00040752313,0.00006774957,0.0005390196,0.000075452146,0.0000044371236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012789943,0.000056014454,0.000077899116,0.0007667741,0.0007040653,0.00039239594,0.00028303248,0.000116983254,1.9300532e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011144511,0.00011494858,0.5311491,0.00040341547,0.000032560783,4.1354125e-9,0.010489372,0.000120931756,0.032645896,0.42091525,0.0016213562,0.0024960695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002008697,0.000037884773,0.9056104,0.00091189425,0.000040058323,4.6924202e-7,0.03991017,0.0005222748,0.013341151,0.038940873,0.00035876594,0.00012519535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000084416984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047690673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38197437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070995724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047589994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31343797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414192265","doi":"10.1017/9781839704710.006","title":"The Same-Sex Marriage Debates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Scholarship; Government (linguistics); Family law; International law; Common law","score_opus":0.016879034467716113,"score_gpt":0.2835647353811739,"score_spread":0.2666857009134578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414192265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010039713,0.0045348196,0.000097844706,0.0009746881,0.0025587464,0.0001996195,0.000027406351,0.00040672364,0.99119014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002839167,0.0045950036,0.00017157612,0.0003907566,0.0010957551,0.000012589488,0.000006604591,0.00020565595,0.99323815],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989366,0.00008517735,0.00011013563,0.00023824733,0.00030201487,0.00032780383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995109,0.000092149035,0.000044454922,0.00025627002,0.000018304661,0.000077935925],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000365231,0.00015098267,0.0001399074,0.000056699417,0.00023585554,0.00025195128,0.00042733565,0.00028760367,0.0033531578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000539416,0.000092834765,0.00008888558,0.00017985859,0.00026410655,0.00001618086,0.00006110981,0.00017738216,0.0024439795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.963974e-7,0.0000043657737,0.00014671609,0.000011827146,0.000039562045,0.000003540559,0.0022029986,9.286208e-8,4.184269e-7,0.09569447,0.90072346,0.0011722735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026199321,0.0000043025816,0.00004038366,0.000021562004,0.000020471058,1.4996803e-7,0.01426304,0.000011045334,1.9358819e-7,0.012852832,0.9726177,0.0001421278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009617023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06292894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082841635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004673621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015139529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99833274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414291932","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2025.10013","title":"Behavioural insights policies in Canada: support for nudges vs nudging","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioural Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nudge theory; Public opinion; Public policy; Subject (documents); Behavioral economics; Motivated reasoning; Optimism","score_opus":0.04785665213834419,"score_gpt":0.31757013678193147,"score_spread":0.2697134846435873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414291932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95570374,0.0001101519,0.00006294056,0.02462369,0.0008983822,0.0006283225,0.00016399172,0.00011305256,0.017695723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98763525,0.00005940231,0.0001728536,0.0041478327,0.00021855929,0.00012931498,0.000096409865,0.000025666137,0.007514721],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971233,0.00014661156,0.00053051824,0.00040013297,0.0004840475,0.001315384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880743,0.0001355165,0.00013519314,0.00032553906,0.00025466018,0.0003416715],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040910975,0.00028106704,0.00039312136,0.0007249899,0.0007334971,0.0002707567,0.0007455716,0.00019963013,0.0000420899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033376884,0.00028903538,0.00013659993,0.0011958547,0.00025444385,0.00050134753,0.00013230988,0.00026842128,0.000004257675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007147928,0.000065470565,0.7971782,0.000009904769,0.000010727594,0.0000069417033,0.005059924,0.0000021907454,0.000013617696,0.18638383,0.009699274,0.001562768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006753208,0.000029410927,0.9533655,0.0000151199765,0.00002876613,0.0000012913181,0.012547232,0.00005375909,0.000021348402,0.004046436,0.028877728,0.0003380617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18233739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029335935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015809935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414592679","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/gvkej_v1","title":"The Role of Environmental Contexts on Impacts of Gender Minority Stress","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Psychological Association","funders":"","keywords":"Stressor; Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Multilevel model; Social environment; Association (psychology); Social stress; Social support","score_opus":0.00966851894004691,"score_gpt":0.26212642522964386,"score_spread":0.25245790628959697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414592679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7896011,0.00046460016,0.000016947288,0.00006706427,0.000121094716,0.00009962158,0.000041018488,0.0000067362034,0.20958185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732304,0.00029771894,0.000022717271,0.00007223836,0.000019232222,0.0000015007897,0.0000017282177,0.000001772247,0.002260043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993259,0.000075309,0.00013479382,0.00008888211,0.00021786295,0.00015726099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996025,0.00014146119,0.000054402804,0.00014525473,0.000017924285,0.00003847947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021129439,0.00005484285,0.00008975055,0.000022349599,0.00017887582,0.000011554064,0.00018817265,0.000056170935,0.00005415194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035171077,0.000038125316,0.00004954525,0.000078058525,0.00026424121,0.000033603897,0.00003244904,0.000051422077,0.0000033149197],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023358394,0.00020297336,0.6769883,0.000011996614,0.00005371685,2.6464272e-7,0.008046869,0.000010211445,0.002643689,0.3036213,0.00027577727,0.008121523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022605434,0.000036419726,0.9094293,0.0000065152176,0.000017357657,2.7893298e-8,0.07561068,0.000066158434,0.0024106,0.008958045,0.0031722607,0.000066557004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016056146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00275959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29466325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043295917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007805107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24272196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414736707","doi":"10.1017/lap.2025.10031","title":"Gender Equality in Conditional Cash Transfer Designs: A Disappearing Policy Recipe in Latin America and the World Bank? - Nora Nagels. 2024. Gender Equality in Conditional Cash Transfer Designs: A disappearing policy recipe in Latin America and the World Bank? Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Tables, figures, notes, bibliography, index, 213pp; hardcover $119.99, softcover $39.99.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Latin American Politics and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Conditional cash transfer; Recipe; Gender equality; Transfer (computing); Cash","score_opus":0.04011901966695155,"score_gpt":0.3152077797923504,"score_spread":0.27508876012539885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414736707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9321296,0.0039066076,0.021806201,0.009883779,0.0002542585,0.004062669,0.0036716,0.00015366712,0.02413157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97995174,0.008304367,0.0011149762,0.009447942,0.0002446888,0.00028308018,0.0002305174,0.00006953501,0.0003531354],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99181896,0.0025067725,0.0015468926,0.001233843,0.0010460989,0.0018474411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99464726,0.004002978,0.00026956608,0.00053899805,0.00015403346,0.0003871835],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024979284,0.00080117455,0.0014427317,0.0020996616,0.0009168884,0.0005309975,0.0005370498,0.0003254122,0.00012607769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047946433,0.00067968655,0.00041970488,0.012639969,0.0057205656,0.00022819047,0.0002603711,0.0015406802,0.0000018935465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003029176,0.00018301306,0.4750063,0.00021908474,0.00027654754,0.000016942175,0.061016496,0.0009372859,0.00006929813,0.45998472,0.00057395647,0.001413434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056800256,0.000044825225,0.8237822,0.00020043767,0.000085654305,0.000002459104,0.02853993,0.0054731076,0.00000501559,0.13383505,0.0014873076,0.00086399046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20521596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069346145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3487759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062962074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011706898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415145629","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5589668","title":"What Did We Learn from the North American Income Maintenance Experiments? New Data and Evidence on Household Behavior and Labor Supply","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Point (geometry); Marital status; Household income; Panel data; Estimation; Statistical evidence","score_opus":0.044216174803265125,"score_gpt":0.3225703757401181,"score_spread":0.278354200936853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415145629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9316354,0.057925034,0.00030195748,0.008228683,0.0010935576,0.00046655815,0.0002621521,0.000044424676,0.00004227154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5975719,0.39978042,0.000121464116,0.00046052868,0.00047653558,0.000012848719,0.000026019068,0.000019437057,0.0015308276],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959166,0.00047963578,0.0003927942,0.0008094864,0.0006550463,0.0017464531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978788,0.00040472348,0.0004493608,0.00092223036,0.00009832494,0.00024658325],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015525775,0.00036788997,0.00045163586,0.00009200981,0.0008207686,0.0010122227,0.0019895323,0.00016167283,0.000009225681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025563908,0.00028309666,0.00007718109,0.00032308075,0.00055262144,0.00062663184,0.001162544,0.0036487447,0.0000025445365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008710386,0.00007204022,0.9391372,0.000012686302,0.00020294813,0.000011433416,0.011008639,0.00003212781,0.0000104183455,0.0056546843,0.0006035095,0.043167185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065263343,0.00029327653,0.86401707,0.0011223046,0.0003427989,0.000019067718,0.10498079,0.00009587755,0.0000027325164,0.022197118,0.00559241,0.0006838994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020671682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12717523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34185538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084687275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006387462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415268365","doi":"10.1111/spol.70016","title":"Measuring the Gender Gap in Unpaid Care Work in Colombia: A Decomposition Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Manitoba Health","funders":"","keywords":"Unpaid work; Socioeconomic status; Care work; Time-use survey; Gender gap; Marital status; Work (physics); Paid work; Child care","score_opus":0.04537471065948938,"score_gpt":0.35954586022058066,"score_spread":0.31417114956109127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415268365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97367585,0.00015686556,0.00014132977,0.0035700481,0.00007278137,0.00019306164,0.0000076157,0.00001700446,0.022165434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991317,0.00007010991,0.000031310523,0.00036842376,0.00020407772,0.000019223688,0.00002025622,0.000002683888,0.00015224298],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990617,0.0002592826,0.0001785253,0.00015042466,0.00014962288,0.00020046697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997528,0.00006484294,0.00004883266,0.000055730354,0.00004804569,0.000029729443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004020973,0.00007074251,0.00012403984,0.00021306722,0.00055606896,0.00010764712,0.0000853582,0.00012854832,0.0000031744803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086408734,0.00006916326,0.00005490667,0.0019109681,0.00012631538,0.00009161108,0.000015609081,0.00012224606,6.7104014e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008983223,0.000117630625,0.53899103,0.000043816788,0.00011717815,0.000005218437,0.23706837,0.0001978299,0.000067931345,0.21710362,0.00017613704,0.006021413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021845191,0.000010122992,0.92422056,0.000009749803,0.00005813445,5.312873e-8,0.068345584,0.00006522215,0.000007034037,0.006540065,0.0004436135,0.00008141923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040127467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08563364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38522953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023359456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054040307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93105114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415280219","doi":"","title":"Women in Times of Crisis: Rethinking the Extraordinary and the Everyday: Summary of conference presentations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Narrative","score_opus":0.02054338810800668,"score_gpt":0.263751688826978,"score_spread":0.24320830071897134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415280219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005467957,0.008078598,0.0009512177,0.00974433,0.00016842579,0.0005302929,0.00007012645,0.00006808029,0.974921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5600084,0.006911887,0.0011275295,0.00006676897,0.000021315831,0.000057796784,0.000026382397,0.00006746083,0.43171245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943977,0.0044311974,0.0003175242,0.00026352817,0.00036088735,0.00022914706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718845,0.0013671843,0.00031044774,0.00067783904,0.00040113062,0.000054942502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065738875,0.00013566167,0.0002746585,0.00015044035,0.00017792311,0.00011063246,0.0007532683,0.00016385598,0.00027341925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065033673,0.00009732857,0.000075192365,0.000498795,0.0011418123,0.00006396846,0.000258793,0.00028575133,0.0000049777404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008477226,0.00008767958,0.002228066,0.00014352394,0.00007826964,0.0000010975132,0.3499828,0.0000019378128,0.000024137722,0.6115906,0.034681845,0.0011715733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019319174,0.0000018429903,0.009775378,0.0060102055,0.000262579,0.000004491942,0.26118493,0.003296859,0.00023359626,0.41353822,0.3029344,0.0008255632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014194557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01783596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55454046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039866787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003115812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415481924","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0335142","title":"Do women’s autonomy lessen the brunt of unequal household responsibilities in the patriarchal context of semi-arid Northern Ghana?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Autonomy; Laundry; Context (archaeology); Agrarian society; Poverty; Rural area","score_opus":0.05719906887031863,"score_gpt":0.26755703941191566,"score_spread":0.21035797054159705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415481924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99318475,0.00042882175,0.000019952719,0.0017874839,0.00007302349,0.00048598455,0.00008981282,0.000021547568,0.0039086333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984537,0.00014396489,0.000031567317,0.00028874553,0.00005823076,0.000056396577,0.0000025971153,0.000008192877,0.0009566427],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789053,0.0007002225,0.00038808046,0.00018904988,0.00051856646,0.00031353495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997971,0.0012844296,0.00013778133,0.00041585346,0.00015764937,0.00003330795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023029756,0.00010844863,0.00029965138,0.0001044173,0.00019482305,0.00003268851,0.00060647645,0.000093787,0.000015110624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053428434,0.00007239426,0.00006664427,0.00049760897,0.00056681654,0.000063318716,0.00008628105,0.00020932363,0.0000017005633],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014143309,0.0008733582,0.33651164,0.00012394438,0.0001801961,0.0000024030012,0.59265125,0.00007690848,0.0005985164,0.0681655,0.000043361906,0.00063146773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006490096,0.000117019474,0.09970827,0.0001451237,0.000065197346,6.466243e-8,0.8894825,0.00012795154,0.00032024563,0.008552675,0.000684395,0.00014758136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008778572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041577905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2968312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023201374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011710688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99782205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415915153","doi":"10.16995/rhetm.20252","title":"Oli Hawrylyshyn’s Contribution to the Economic Valuation of Unpaid Domestic Work","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of the history of economic thought and methodology.","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unpaid work; Work (physics); Valuation (finance); Economic analysis; Domestic work","score_opus":0.11380846470244632,"score_gpt":0.3718280685922456,"score_spread":0.2580196038897993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415915153","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24867448,0.6818461,0.012023704,0.011825119,0.019176774,0.002970586,0.0000850573,0.00003460792,0.023363583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6038873,0.3293712,0.024506327,0.005900547,0.00070253585,0.00016965206,0.000023402637,0.000041587755,0.035397425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719685,0.001811557,0.0005879521,0.00018905266,0.00006118388,0.00015341632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977923,0.0011698107,0.00054478645,0.0003750022,0.00007967587,0.00003842389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007352372,0.000104621206,0.00058175036,0.000071948736,0.00011896137,0.0000028670715,0.00040723922,0.000094275856,0.00006057376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011486835,0.00007466561,0.00018935313,0.00011095654,0.0005362263,0.000052282627,0.000081317776,0.00009070334,0.0000067124806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000122632,0.00005717532,0.009620052,0.002570103,0.00032821737,1.72414e-7,0.009221369,0.0009628865,0.00040271724,0.85978574,0.08782591,0.029103022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042103845,0.000047649428,0.02523009,0.0015913213,0.00053911237,0.0000011819844,0.0008207546,0.000101765385,0.00006128182,0.020091875,0.95091975,0.00017415498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003729136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038485284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86309385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080122816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089875184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3044775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416041751","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v16i1.78194","title":"Social Policy Trends: Low Income Entry and Exit Rates","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Low income; Social policy; Social security; Public policy; Consumption (sociology)","score_opus":0.04923736590908409,"score_gpt":0.3592151903165544,"score_spread":0.30997782440747035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416041751","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30546248,0.00054892275,0.00009126045,0.5306682,0.0004493873,0.0007017278,0.00091854774,0.00053608394,0.1606234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9443216,0.005741441,0.000051837673,0.0015964502,0.005063287,0.00018814183,0.0001849076,0.000070041744,0.042782307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99371016,0.0012118034,0.0011770669,0.0007666952,0.0012052954,0.0019289706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953532,0.0005514513,0.0008333734,0.0011716328,0.0009665713,0.0011237474],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034961414,0.0005249397,0.0006571849,0.005192454,0.0034314923,0.0015113992,0.0024602688,0.0005394961,0.00064146024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005543216,0.000464529,0.00037361565,0.02951903,0.0029588055,0.0017138197,0.0008868622,0.0007636318,0.00049567845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006513781,0.00025281232,0.04147909,0.00006195053,0.0002706335,4.1182653e-7,0.017408626,0.000008029932,0.00009760888,0.8467563,0.08452119,0.009136863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073007477,0.000047894104,0.83551955,0.00002201423,0.00008372884,0.0000037128148,0.018261526,0.00047903892,0.000004413659,0.059734512,0.08463721,0.00047632682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014698865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014224047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79404044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048577195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006386416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416058824","doi":"10.1093/sp/jxaf044","title":"Bringing Women Back into the (Collective) Kitchen: The Case of the Ley de comedores sociales in Mexico City","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citizenship; Framing (construction); Latin Americans; Mexico city; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Social citizenship","score_opus":0.07938173506270375,"score_gpt":0.3825873138195411,"score_spread":0.30320557875683735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416058824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95511913,0.0011682797,0.0002636519,0.008198693,0.0014066437,0.00042413198,0.00007018235,0.000020388541,0.033328872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99280846,0.0020893428,0.000119557444,0.0020819616,0.0002632794,0.00006175783,0.0000015675578,0.000011677119,0.0025623825],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977103,0.0005645222,0.00043348473,0.00024252763,0.00043098233,0.0006181746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983297,0.00093338196,0.00018015718,0.00015661336,0.0003647322,0.000035436435],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021274465,0.0001763025,0.00026559338,0.00005326653,0.0022980398,0.00009067796,0.0007874865,0.00011952967,0.000014251748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055916177,0.00012080594,0.00024412015,0.0009157381,0.0028860166,0.000083879524,0.0005595253,0.00049154664,6.891804e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005740164,0.00006842647,0.0879384,0.000030007437,0.00041296214,0.000004813068,0.7870551,0.00015186009,0.0000043156588,0.11914736,0.0049450384,0.00023601444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030133224,0.0000038292483,0.06567478,0.000019158892,0.000015004173,8.56948e-7,0.5958084,0.00027073114,0.000009955527,0.3358345,0.001962511,0.00009894057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01431785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04157862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21668714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047112196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011420007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416533261","doi":"10.1111/spol.70032","title":"What Are the Determinants of Permanent and Temporary Non‐Take‐Up of the French Minimum‐Income Benefit?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Welfare; Renting; Poverty; Credibility; Residence; Solidarity; Order (exchange); Salient","score_opus":0.024806442416992352,"score_gpt":0.326007367652191,"score_spread":0.30120092523519865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416533261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919839,0.0002121791,0.0000026649354,0.00451087,0.00034163572,0.00020266627,0.00004096453,0.0000054695734,0.002699644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997554,0.00040493175,0.0000048496377,0.000256872,0.00023648627,0.0000057410894,0.0000029895082,0.00000318407,0.0015309466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925923,0.00008766915,0.00022091733,0.00011634581,0.00018067977,0.00013515538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953365,0.00007514326,0.00018967447,0.00009918994,0.000070512026,0.000031853757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025916475,0.00007994453,0.00014358279,0.00003653021,0.0006330685,0.00007447823,0.00014800909,0.00011338507,0.0000017217139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078490906,0.000055965116,0.000052319814,0.00025297204,0.0005460351,0.0001621655,0.00004604937,0.00007320536,1.6363046e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003781776,0.00012587679,0.78848666,0.0002552859,0.00005037849,0.0000013217128,0.1017666,0.0000013470788,0.00044369913,0.093956195,0.00044519946,0.014429626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020024112,0.000034927496,0.93002033,0.00007122164,0.000026795482,4.5002295e-7,0.05528997,0.00004386308,0.00018046587,0.013609434,0.00045426373,0.00006803477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017493783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00798103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14153369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020978478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044645747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4869115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416555642","doi":"10.64628/aam.d4msmjfa5","title":"Motherhood changes how women spend, save and think about money","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.020322100864854514,"score_gpt":0.26952960221654887,"score_spread":0.24920750135169437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416555642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65700704,0.008200484,0.0008404104,0.019630125,0.0021955245,0.00080332265,0.00007105877,0.00015857205,0.31109348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8510991,0.019507786,0.000391042,0.0033117395,0.00031626987,0.000023333556,0.0000033599647,0.00002308413,0.12532432],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971197,0.0002525863,0.00026347564,0.0007454117,0.0005045638,0.0011142424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987181,0.00017376394,0.00013764437,0.00043905654,0.00015585596,0.00037559372],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008992903,0.00040238784,0.0005160356,0.00020589108,0.00092465925,0.00069738703,0.000543311,0.00044644237,0.00078885525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000120677694,0.00037460585,0.000111202615,0.0008646512,0.00062520057,0.0002777574,0.0002674829,0.00031619763,0.00004744734],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006082355,0.00037753675,0.06311814,0.0002846716,0.0007333262,0.000018902032,0.4721202,0.0000067903893,0.00032299614,0.39134648,0.008322069,0.06328808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015255786,0.00028415525,0.1002048,0.00012220962,0.00015850266,0.0000014901121,0.7410997,0.002289128,0.000045178058,0.060825005,0.09249003,0.0009541963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016462444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075303987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33052146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026588282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036207563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416771018","doi":"10.5539/jel.v15n2p160","title":"Strategies on Movement for Welfare Provision Andemployment Networking with the Principles of Solidarity of informal Female Worker in Loei Province","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education and Learning","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Thailand Science Research and Innovation","keywords":"Welfare; Workforce; Focus group; Solidarity; Qualitative property; Qualitative research; Buddhism; Social Welfare; Social work; Grounded theory","score_opus":0.021565606955561485,"score_gpt":0.3114852227093337,"score_spread":0.28991961575377223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416771018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898043,0.0010414899,0.0014973414,0.0019437701,0.000491527,0.0005093696,8.678612e-7,0.000002101905,0.0047092177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784195,0.00050805294,0.00044762224,0.00011761713,0.00013423423,0.0000078095945,0.000001261614,0.0000053921735,0.00093604275],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851257,0.00018531506,0.00063964864,0.000118609314,0.00033880855,0.0002050779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981633,0.00018719689,0.0011061149,0.000083570056,0.00040957864,0.00005025199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018925073,0.00012474683,0.0002704202,0.0001749897,0.00046133663,0.0001231088,0.0001681087,0.000083102976,0.0000061741766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008614204,0.00008392276,0.00006513499,0.00034532874,0.00017252262,0.00028659977,0.00003694805,0.00042995228,3.673687e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007497679,0.00088619447,0.6443311,0.0005702405,0.000131024,4.958076e-7,0.117589734,0.09244109,0.00006266854,0.05515658,0.000059884427,0.08802125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069630187,0.0008748568,0.46073243,0.001311503,0.000058833528,6.131933e-7,0.51671094,0.0028456042,0.000020919744,0.00022188897,0.016427891,0.000098232216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016700328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007946608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3991212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010162973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022684126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40240666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416807958","doi":"10.1163/9789004750593_5","title":"Feedlot Welfare Standards in the United States and Canada","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Feedlot; Government (linguistics); Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.012781863182221341,"score_gpt":0.2500667003719292,"score_spread":0.23728483718970783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416807958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04487887,0.0009881436,0.000098632045,0.016153324,0.0012633081,0.0009662002,0.0027756607,0.000035500794,0.93284035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70008856,0.03464813,0.000070423506,0.008757692,0.00018908764,0.000019690291,0.00048486827,0.000050429237,0.2556911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99616545,0.000244127,0.0006211918,0.00063101604,0.0016380441,0.0007001403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981306,0.00043939543,0.00018183453,0.0004253499,0.0006236775,0.00019909898],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013872946,0.0005506571,0.0005608695,0.0002984977,0.0013207595,0.00031892088,0.00078755006,0.00045138272,0.00089615607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011697277,0.00041139196,0.00008491813,0.00043623912,0.0006917519,0.00009197762,0.00017461622,0.00075365737,0.0000012459669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022253595,0.000026270596,0.005700421,0.000102501646,0.00010600563,0.000040819243,0.015427009,0.00013298103,7.879027e-8,0.9683589,0.008542924,0.001539843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036951795,0.000057846213,0.013818985,0.0001119647,0.00008492164,0.0000012929687,0.17905651,0.00036795938,1.08052994e-7,0.0074715517,0.798135,0.0005243439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.989412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9608873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008395137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00434282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417194311","doi":"10.7202/1120222ar","title":"Public Policy for Women: The State, Income Security, and Labour Market Issues","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Public policy; Basic income; Government (linguistics); Social policy; Wage; Productivity","score_opus":0.05067652518100306,"score_gpt":0.3810213240667877,"score_spread":0.3303447988857846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417194311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.559037,0.035938647,0.0005616386,0.20934094,0.004824724,0.0026474851,0.00058681023,0.0005128078,0.18654989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976983,0.011133783,0.00027836626,0.0069259964,0.0021617154,0.00007536622,0.000005391637,0.000016428517,0.0024199195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971037,0.00046442452,0.00035320097,0.00042565598,0.00051305816,0.0011399698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983028,0.0007360783,0.00006134952,0.00014151193,0.0005647373,0.00019348525],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001293763,0.00027094746,0.00043928536,0.0000678826,0.0023091084,0.00028926434,0.00041436782,0.00022984625,0.00001783986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040435977,0.0002036455,0.000086144755,0.00073931995,0.0013519974,0.00029002296,0.00017636368,0.00036866963,0.0000035653038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024377994,0.000115736584,0.0028666474,0.00025285056,0.000082617305,0.00001477036,0.33183375,4.6235516e-7,0.0000071448894,0.64438516,0.019296799,0.0011197105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005104779,0.00009208934,0.046195485,0.000019274268,0.00008331536,0.0000038516137,0.41616303,0.000020616983,4.596599e-7,0.36517346,0.17138445,0.00035350057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050871604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013893903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41794598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033317183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016561309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W562274058","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139030663.007","title":"Promoting Equity in Economic Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Content (measure theory); Business; Public economics; Internet privacy; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03841177685884044,"score_gpt":0.25466915421790304,"score_spread":0.21625737735906259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W562274058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006746016,0.00016701157,0.000026597043,0.00001939984,0.00061638217,0.00047446322,0.0001490662,0.000110362926,0.9916907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055986933,0.00020907914,0.00004514926,0.00002663738,0.00039220674,6.1060695e-7,0.00002824074,0.000027913136,0.9432832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984069,0.000095407864,0.00021489488,0.00044267505,0.00025563943,0.0005844952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990167,0.00006993643,0.00022826513,0.00034541497,0.00006979274,0.00026988823],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044808947,0.00029161043,0.0003782565,0.0001913408,0.0004897293,0.00006516434,0.0006788428,0.00056348974,0.000017056003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000074210147,0.00036883767,0.0001615281,0.000008776334,0.0004086226,0.00019639694,0.00043458925,0.00048524028,0.000051048308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000119909455,0.000010787473,0.00014991079,0.00003793181,0.000038127193,0.000056932044,0.0033910067,0.000001718703,0.0000035454689,0.9933288,0.0020098316,0.0009593792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003532018,0.000014465352,0.00031677398,0.000100053505,0.000082550585,0.0000013908343,0.00045308258,0.00006017373,0.00000714697,0.0003284241,0.997802,0.0004807052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007016124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019840351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012498184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003888575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W57339754","doi":"","title":"Some Comments on Canada, Women, Gender, and Race","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Social History","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Gender studies; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02669940054532314,"score_gpt":0.29478208106747084,"score_spread":0.2680826805221477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W57339754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42490444,0.19966,0.00007270972,0.020648329,0.01177433,0.0009328441,0.00023765715,0.0000822976,0.34168738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89017034,0.079995684,0.00010258279,0.024226544,0.00075979985,0.000033038148,0.000025834068,0.000017036842,0.004669117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885,0.00006371048,0.0002097283,0.0001284265,0.0005943658,0.00015377579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995251,0.00004063652,0.00015126487,0.000059280574,0.00014633167,0.00007734024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003655958,0.00007811732,0.00017529176,0.000034899713,0.00015209171,0.0000047128324,0.00022164416,0.000043494387,0.00015001948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014021393,0.00008477656,0.000045705085,0.00004707241,0.0001884114,0.00008788731,0.000026485843,0.00009351669,0.000006561323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014769193,0.00017882322,0.0019467318,0.00068610976,0.00010872635,0.000010933117,0.03266387,0.0000036093816,0.00002560422,0.86791164,0.09226113,0.0041880733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002587622,0.00001413496,0.020897537,0.00024754455,0.000009442436,3.1292126e-7,0.002525925,6.832738e-7,6.928169e-7,0.0039224382,0.972017,0.00010552026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07571572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030800652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87975585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042090425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011720217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W607167054","doi":"10.4135/9781446263778","title":"Welfare Theory and Development","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Social policy; Sociology; Social citizenship; Welfare capitalism; Social Welfare; Politics; Welfare; Political economy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025514242117345813,"score_gpt":0.251934378290702,"score_spread":0.22642013617335616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W607167054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017384012,0.0005136721,0.00045180327,0.00006561609,0.00039496418,0.0001631388,0.0000064118008,0.00008577223,0.9981448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017358869,0.0005491298,0.0012168651,0.0002801836,0.00014507845,0.0000063320904,0.000024980598,0.00001935215,0.99602216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990672,0.000082735874,0.0001437869,0.00023397557,0.00023262839,0.00023967642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956125,0.000053301348,0.000059472033,0.00012885383,0.000072347204,0.00012476416],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065609335,0.00015429614,0.00016906016,0.00005762467,0.0004768916,0.000042662967,0.00020820062,0.00033830016,0.0015314559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026515996,0.00013514765,0.00002941725,0.000027079774,0.00023849077,0.00004542492,0.00007361784,0.00014966501,0.00012795697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002537995,0.000007089313,0.00029132032,0.000015369349,0.000027432296,0.0000028291377,0.022315882,1.892567e-8,6.032801e-8,0.96270204,0.006397792,0.008237622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053548738,0.0000060212606,0.0022213473,0.000012505455,0.0000117219515,3.0863504e-7,0.008558633,1.1289674e-7,2.3880978e-7,0.048042875,0.94088334,0.00020936903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015640161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021918349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93448555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012503211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009234742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W615586350","doi":"","title":"Twenty-first-century motherhood : experience, identity, policy, agency","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Columbia University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Queer; Sociology; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political science; History","score_opus":0.01896645979797393,"score_gpt":0.2470747381724541,"score_spread":0.22810827837448017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W615586350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00811656,0.00013544814,0.000121811136,0.00003795467,0.0020305726,0.0009003192,0.00026377282,0.00031328126,0.98808026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008169763,0.001352704,0.00014182662,0.00014838991,0.00091034063,0.0000047684225,0.000043929747,0.00006523358,0.98916304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968664,0.000206095,0.00028886297,0.00079824333,0.0009923682,0.00084803964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978488,0.00008713689,0.00037334583,0.000843336,0.00033174866,0.0005156124],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030300245,0.00037719414,0.0005092902,0.00027016658,0.0020268725,0.0005685401,0.002271409,0.0012555505,0.0002873092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070236274,0.00062338664,0.00036282194,0.000112265705,0.0012544611,0.00044508837,0.0007784806,0.00095327065,0.000039717255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035801215,0.00021809891,0.0029768972,0.00021039994,0.00029372505,0.00028632945,0.11880653,0.0000039285246,0.000027133472,0.78817064,0.08558099,0.0033895508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048725493,0.000030179004,0.0014445848,0.00007117301,0.000128562,0.0000017359775,0.004543525,0.000008750916,8.2761005e-7,0.0046749874,0.9879627,0.0006456947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.087957434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17463382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9023817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096961926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024239782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W622874139","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2586421","title":"How the Demand for Labor May Adapt to the Availability of Labor: A Preliminary Exploration with Historical Data","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Labor demand; Labor disputes; Labor relations; Economics; Business; Wage","score_opus":0.06356130100825565,"score_gpt":0.2920683588752001,"score_spread":0.22850705786694447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W622874139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.430881,0.013306176,0.23410198,0.31715593,0.0013403343,0.0022262104,0.00016676729,0.00006622521,0.0007553778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99370193,0.0012004583,0.00061004184,0.00023229429,0.0006034603,0.000029200342,0.000011213807,0.000015175146,0.0035962276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769694,0.00036220727,0.00020544781,0.0002229841,0.0005486378,0.0009638004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848646,0.00018074826,0.00018358343,0.0004936426,0.00052819494,0.00012736853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005913788,0.00011266094,0.00015816452,0.000034979545,0.0005623922,0.00010617913,0.0009749374,0.00006957041,0.0000017496945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007265841,0.00006082213,0.000040638603,0.0003837986,0.00012964463,0.0004674485,0.00007722191,0.0005459109,0.0000020973193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031422419,0.0008055999,0.04996979,0.000050587263,0.0006072773,0.0000042799884,0.14652322,0.0016532938,0.00012027443,0.665443,0.099371575,0.032308877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014074265,0.003085224,0.0065347045,0.000023709537,0.0002418629,0.000034485798,0.28692612,0.0012990388,0.000010721766,0.107099175,0.5929893,0.0003481898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000609153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03356572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5628209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012706304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048081777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98406917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W624476462","doi":"","title":"Are people money rich and time poor in Japan","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Time preference; Leisure time; Economics; Product (mathematics); Goods and services; Quality (philosophy); Time-use survey; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Work (physics); Economy","score_opus":0.015240280773014122,"score_gpt":0.2680361549390081,"score_spread":0.252795874165994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W624476462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819295,0.000486413,0.00022563837,0.002104011,0.00065750314,0.00021916321,0.00026801587,0.00009525222,0.014014523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996651,0.00016526761,0.00071140844,0.0009312919,0.0007154309,0.000010028424,0.00016288941,0.0000067900933,0.00064588786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998344,0.0000903592,0.0002801774,0.00037882093,0.0005519116,0.00035472144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916226,0.00010876145,0.00012595841,0.00021100859,0.00016684913,0.00022519135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003378571,0.00016082823,0.00021271776,0.00008771632,0.0007683992,0.00015762328,0.0002300672,0.00012414342,0.000024839133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007822035,0.00016627517,0.000035864472,0.0005409285,0.0002994102,0.00071897625,0.000070754184,0.00019025,0.000035254798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010247033,0.00034785943,0.74504125,0.00004513077,0.00003323362,0.00020853517,0.014202919,0.00034678105,0.0023604077,0.2289689,0.007811723,0.0005307813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007028783,0.00007033163,0.94144183,0.000111107736,0.000032277792,0.000029063309,0.0072442805,0.0007350132,0.000088402754,0.0013025523,0.04774502,0.00049726304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002774821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002956951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22766635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017920021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041499888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67805046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W634426192","doi":"10.9783/9780812202472","title":"Western Welfare in Decline","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":182,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.030485844464566342,"score_gpt":0.23612850678818847,"score_spread":0.20564266232362213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W634426192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023920503,0.00040170844,0.00007713106,0.00008838153,0.00030933085,0.00038955436,0.00015071098,0.00007193901,0.9961192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025042383,0.0006186385,0.0002566574,0.000047327674,0.0001612101,2.7005427e-7,0.000040978353,0.000029129078,0.9738034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982887,0.00015657548,0.00023008506,0.00035113347,0.0005208107,0.0004526983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989547,0.00007793393,0.00027568237,0.00035170835,0.00015244423,0.00018754197],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002929243,0.000252639,0.00047071042,0.00020405669,0.00029760442,0.000026965228,0.0009084525,0.0006064077,0.0002890156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016236021,0.00034032605,0.0001641339,0.000030603285,0.00048195495,0.0001086689,0.00032896537,0.00042403533,0.000032309665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026342508,0.00068955414,0.02883197,0.0011013908,0.0005528533,0.0008899327,0.34794012,0.0001314258,0.000029788924,0.5428858,0.055852093,0.020831652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055280613,0.000026086625,0.0025110207,0.00009980421,0.000095157004,7.6286847e-7,0.003666645,0.000020565842,6.142572e-7,0.00061190786,0.99206066,0.00035398058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009884588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04271257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93620855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034562877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002626552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W642636351","doi":"","title":"Demographics and the Changing Canadian Family","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Payment; Work (physics); Inequality; Paid work; Parental leave; Child support; Division of labour; Demographics; Reproduction; Family Leave; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Labour economics; Political science; Demography; Finance","score_opus":0.06405612677159848,"score_gpt":0.28865514033811607,"score_spread":0.22459901356651757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W642636351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885496,0.00039551494,0.0003291444,0.0005810009,0.00043601982,0.00032329073,0.000016439259,0.00008255957,0.009286444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99229777,0.00072633557,0.000033440603,0.0018367224,0.00007183861,0.0000010550581,0.0000045239626,0.000022781247,0.005005542],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752593,0.0007730691,0.00014876129,0.0003736562,0.00036539315,0.0008131954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873483,0.00017147028,0.000088836845,0.00032740645,0.00015147496,0.0005259981],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014891331,0.00021187149,0.00022497363,0.00062579376,0.001878151,0.00038336648,0.0005841313,0.00023724556,0.000008148213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011242301,0.00020264683,0.00010582112,0.0011918652,0.00070891,0.0007308815,0.00008520877,0.0004531777,0.00003211002],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011051961,0.000010140645,0.95544034,0.00000668752,0.000033038763,0.000051745596,0.007846267,0.0000045214215,0.000008003614,0.036463205,6.9062e-7,0.00012428738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013023936,0.00002127609,0.91697574,0.000038227194,0.00008916285,0.0000071970194,0.042121116,7.281703e-7,0.0000057981606,0.0014281342,0.037630677,0.00037953779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024513837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43543717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43298578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021586024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004983175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W642823573","doi":"10.7202/028961ar","title":"Determinants of Weekly Work Hours in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); History; Demographic economics; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.025961727697404964,"score_gpt":0.26349480779670925,"score_spread":0.2375330800993043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W642823573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821048,0.00018297746,0.000029294475,0.0007242531,0.0001572006,0.00010022266,0.0000118712505,0.000010205295,0.016679203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997081,0.000095333635,0.00028312329,0.000041158542,0.0000758712,0.0000035550127,0.0000027702042,0.0000055371875,0.002411669],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991697,0.000068782916,0.00022922768,0.000102086924,0.00021968734,0.00021048615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995506,0.00014100171,0.00007989811,0.00011431322,0.00004850647,0.000065671586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019117478,0.000061151026,0.00010593052,0.0000770506,0.00015022754,0.000009561537,0.00014788842,0.0001399718,0.00008596195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014427559,0.00006637757,0.000020447038,0.00066378753,0.00007929027,0.000094183466,0.000015631145,0.0001833315,0.000009337197],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012905255,0.000016347922,0.9792677,2.0339314e-7,0.000002521936,0.0000015339085,0.0028744363,0.002692016,6.0417517e-7,0.00073247583,0.0019786078,0.012432275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019353839,0.0000060748275,0.945698,0.000043125972,0.000008860513,2.754394e-7,0.031025913,0.00035397426,0.000015793948,0.000121828634,0.022405973,0.00012661486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74553007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9764761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23094597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039369575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002636659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46773195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W644351097","doi":"","title":"1 BILLION A DAY","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Traffic world","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subtitle; Business; Containerization; Finance; Operations management; Engineering; Aeronautics; Transport engineering; Container (type theory); Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.03507124328221693,"score_gpt":0.26640797180655673,"score_spread":0.23133672852433979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W644351097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63878155,0.0004058096,0.000101207064,0.0023996353,0.0009983314,0.00017294682,0.0000050893314,0.00032565903,0.3568098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94405,0.0001933128,0.0001908653,0.000350359,0.00033024413,0.000005294245,0.0000023455318,0.000009829044,0.054867726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990475,0.000092320515,0.000118815886,0.00017022295,0.00025566752,0.0003154308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959826,0.00007471639,0.000031708343,0.00014926876,0.000032668264,0.00011334728],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029934608,0.00008002531,0.00009629907,0.00010154892,0.0003058608,0.00005447337,0.00019099067,0.000050125374,0.0011252521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039524795,0.00007524709,0.00005434182,0.00067362445,0.00014327995,0.000088846726,0.000011214874,0.00010493983,0.0005669107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010926043,0.0008917996,0.03195567,0.000032615277,0.000080042926,0.00006190051,0.20937398,0.004031938,0.000114610295,0.21006699,0.32615232,0.2172272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004074648,0.000030567546,0.021500504,0.000018499239,0.000023634571,7.4954824e-7,0.0074022124,0.007012299,0.0000031846096,0.0005709156,0.9626712,0.00035874825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013702085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061242017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6365189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059983955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026132224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W646211846","doi":"10.22610/jebs.v4i6.332","title":"On Governance and the Demographic Transition","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Development Research Centre","funders":"Global Development Network; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Economics; Voting; Fertility; Unemployment; Investment (military); Overlapping generations model; Quality (philosophy); Corporate governance; Control (management); Labour economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Finance; Population; Political science","score_opus":0.05411442509305065,"score_gpt":0.30825243338775477,"score_spread":0.2541380082947041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W646211846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874075,0.0102252,0.0000055753326,0.0017055103,0.0003693055,0.000050831168,0.000004547615,0.0000016276801,0.00022991584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9134021,0.08614219,0.000056548033,0.00018250028,0.00018579385,0.0000010720037,9.14094e-8,0.000002716196,0.000026992786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957305,0.000044878223,0.00016408508,0.000044946344,0.00004812159,0.0001249046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996202,0.00008144871,0.0001623867,0.000030350868,0.000049262806,0.0000563386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006608839,0.000057746576,0.00016456711,0.000019852901,0.0003232024,0.00003583849,0.00005023402,0.000031826425,0.000001941948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016378315,0.000036767484,0.000054346165,0.00003317042,0.00036451148,0.00018473898,0.000011840714,0.00008661582,3.193582e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027738258,0.00031816296,0.28495413,0.000016538363,0.00024480082,0.0000037839775,0.11562159,0.000074543284,0.000018934337,0.57624567,0.0009840252,0.021240441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027284068,0.00030545003,0.8554068,0.000052919917,0.00038135028,0.000024336705,0.0999522,0.00006150158,0.0000048791007,0.027037358,0.0137602575,0.00028452245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000109174995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041249552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5704527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003167096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015432664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24858442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W646666083","doi":"10.1016/s1529-2126(2005)9","title":"Gender Realities: Local and Global","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Advances in gender research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.09099993946761599,"score_gpt":0.42891083886812187,"score_spread":0.3379108994005059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W646666083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025406314,0.057415534,0.0011248855,0.00020495999,0.0005079537,0.00063304545,0.00015375174,0.0000755872,0.9396302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06267598,0.21727291,0.0015139261,0.0005024539,0.0022896316,0.00013849112,0.00015657333,0.0001186877,0.7153314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938672,0.0007603078,0.00049756264,0.000985334,0.0023038299,0.0015857312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800026,0.0005121927,0.000101454316,0.00055145187,0.00042341556,0.0004112365],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030545709,0.00037435742,0.0004995529,0.00035589884,0.00069132453,0.00018466896,0.00089430436,0.00078657514,0.0002756994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022362222,0.00039574495,0.00010116211,0.00062337046,0.0026900407,0.00053500745,0.0003899017,0.001384472,0.00013296645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005740097,0.00010456399,0.009174279,0.00040790232,0.00006766828,0.00014001166,0.026285348,0.0002991584,3.6977468e-7,0.877622,0.027613543,0.058227748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002775405,0.00003311924,0.0013991944,0.000052705658,0.000008659817,0.0000043715313,0.027105318,0.00006648562,1.11169406e-7,0.2597809,0.71093285,0.00033875863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011667626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017713306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6833193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024011063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031793446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6887198723","doi":"10.15468/dl.wey743","title":"Occurrence Download","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Global Biodiversity Information Facility","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Matching (statistics); Range (aeronautics); Data set; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.0203085998323265,"score_gpt":0.24620477786409273,"score_spread":0.22589617803176623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6887198723","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009820531,0.00002620294,0.0000042530137,0.00020651816,0.001705282,0.0003682784,0.99520546,0.0001197831,0.0013821723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000023879762,0.0003937144,0.0000011958122,0.00077399507,0.0000033819665,0.0000056620684,0.99879724,1.5209157e-8,9.433087e-7],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977018,0.00023379666,0.0003450043,0.00023898575,0.0010413722,0.0004389966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987414,0.000032077085,0.0003001521,0.00042832416,0.00026990598,0.00022813625],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072097307,0.00023569573,0.0002497044,0.0000958397,0.0016807651,0.00021892725,0.00093102246,0.00035831486,0.035666652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024875987,0.00027734565,0.00016644536,0.0005927616,0.00037960603,0.0009378106,0.00043582066,0.0004080494,0.038613513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016089887,0.00003662302,0.0059107896,0.00004998104,0.000021487866,0.0000019425427,0.0012915215,0.000015555153,3.1784195e-9,0.000002847559,0.9922221,0.00043106996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019892842,0.000021904441,0.0003717287,6.309397e-7,0.000040597955,6.660798e-7,0.008941152,8.4298044e-8,2.0672447e-8,0.0000041840685,0.9901331,0.00028701386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008328487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005247206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007803767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009802016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006735323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6904749811","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0311895.s010","title":"Associations between preterm birth and employment income and employment per year, at or after the age of 18 years for individuals born in 1990–1996 in Canada in the subsample linked to maternal tax with and without matching on maternal income and rural residence.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Household income; Socioeconomic status; Premature birth; Propensity score matching; Population; Birth weight","score_opus":0.033723981011805834,"score_gpt":0.29217993636133954,"score_spread":0.2584559553495337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6904749811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.966592,0.000120563614,5.299832e-7,0.00024984917,0.000021335492,0.000653032,0.03233928,0.0000065867825,0.000016787299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907637,0.000025511883,0.000087849,0.00012472074,0.000035825582,0.00016453213,0.000368808,0.000014281602,0.00010209786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988808,0.00012237908,0.00022108645,0.00020190665,0.0003243068,0.0002495229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994539,0.00031531803,0.000059700098,0.00009367864,0.00001767112,0.00005974734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003530322,0.00011819481,0.00018980748,0.000100842124,0.00010435194,0.00019774625,0.00014184759,0.000056040466,0.00014614443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061884646,0.00007535386,0.000011218819,0.0001638005,0.000031221407,0.00010742331,0.0001256666,0.00013778271,9.516354e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003882639,0.000004053256,0.97961015,0.000055766093,0.000013274204,0.000013105818,0.019968407,0.0000073423184,0.0000039978468,0.000015507612,0.0000895747,0.0001799759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033463413,0.00007137097,0.9955609,0.0009311382,0.000008815275,0.000001775427,0.0024447143,0.000012778894,0.0000024491908,0.0002170319,0.00030843163,0.000106002255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3486881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94250727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5938192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022718433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018901145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.655649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6906447676","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/k8dsn","title":"Practical Documentation of Qualifying Research Activities for the SR&amp;ED Tax Credit","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Tax credit; Work (physics); Income tax; Earned income tax credit; Deferred tax","score_opus":0.11778947897588463,"score_gpt":0.4377484501565768,"score_spread":0.31995897118069216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6906447676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45679563,0.0000053195226,0.053484365,0.0032168804,0.001276865,0.0023776626,0.000049604838,0.00011148106,0.4826822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8873128,0.00048686276,0.0071530244,0.00010256751,0.0006177337,0.0003248451,0.000011132775,0.000028404958,0.10396258],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536294,0.0016840389,0.00043821687,0.00091141707,0.0010102043,0.00059319544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922387,0.0051177437,0.0002588805,0.0015112158,0.00072516565,0.00014830894],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018519001,0.0001528726,0.00023577487,0.00012856131,0.0013047938,0.00024059975,0.0008855022,0.00021368002,0.070768714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012341354,0.00014069563,0.00013721884,0.0003815661,0.0014050645,0.000554007,0.00055325753,0.0004060276,0.05287366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010637552,0.0010632294,0.0792245,0.0003058139,0.00063652825,0.0000044351686,0.2853001,0.00023721538,0.019380258,0.26716352,0.32010904,0.025511608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013542937,0.000014772809,0.031237243,0.00012414236,0.00016563486,0.0000065573704,0.14676724,0.0013764475,0.0070983246,0.06050324,0.7507351,0.00061698956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032231743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002925799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43062606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002752379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006307943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6908393302","doi":"10.26190/unsworks/254","title":"No Child Left Behind?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; TSG101; Hyporeflexia; Gestational period; Diafiltration; Articular cartilage damage; Pretext","score_opus":0.015600524414555157,"score_gpt":0.2381729071308798,"score_spread":0.22257238271632465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6908393302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50519156,0.0007712165,0.000038086033,0.00061238563,0.0031481332,0.00021636857,0.000053362615,0.00020810308,0.4897608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94252723,0.00081520603,0.00059130957,0.0014440212,0.001550245,0.000015492069,0.000014167908,0.000046014982,0.05299629],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974391,0.00019895151,0.0004622643,0.0005798867,0.00044143904,0.0008783812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849796,0.00017980149,0.00019460531,0.00051382266,0.00017008293,0.0004437232],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058630784,0.0003136147,0.0003957424,0.00018312939,0.0012574833,0.00016594147,0.00062467146,0.00034424727,0.011304221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026250194,0.00034654685,0.00024108589,0.00014715167,0.00088231737,0.00045824773,0.00007806704,0.00044118,0.0056076716],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003556873,0.00014491571,0.9413632,0.000010871206,0.000052619085,0.000017869503,0.0115310205,0.000006924535,0.000021887008,0.009440355,0.03695071,0.0004560717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008490989,0.00008685626,0.20942916,0.00004567476,0.000056955614,0.000040194696,0.0052277483,0.0003897334,0.000015948715,0.00058351713,0.78236926,0.0009058702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006506984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051306495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74541855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032174942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021780042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6920615664","doi":"10.60692/tfvmg-66e02","title":"PROTOCOL: The impact of agricultural mechanisation on women's economic empowerment: A mixed‐methods systematic review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic impact analysis; Agriculture; Systematic review; Mechanization; Agricultural productivity; Impact assessment","score_opus":0.04138062464593982,"score_gpt":0.32700119315886167,"score_spread":0.28562056851292184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6920615664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8440239,0.000011126701,0.0037102033,0.00019922118,0.0012851534,0.13582195,0.00024988604,0.0006918643,0.0140067125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96826077,0.0000028276625,0.00005260199,0.00007548101,0.00005091479,0.03130874,0.000017390174,0.0000075719195,0.00022369831],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754757,0.0007782807,0.0008836788,0.00011763689,0.0003572991,0.00031550927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985587,0.00004991898,0.00080988096,0.00033681057,0.00015865301,0.000086009655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036379187,0.00017485212,0.0004317151,0.00015338183,0.00032073984,0.00015227588,0.00031519495,0.00009319751,0.000025005556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010709346,0.00009368098,0.0001857169,0.0004770176,0.000040714203,0.00044215133,0.00004013609,0.00007515795,0.00064982416],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000316407,0.0000069928437,0.0048264335,0.11271428,0.0002612078,5.29168e-7,0.8705507,0.0016589937,0.0000034565508,0.008904322,0.0009316937,0.000109761255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010934748,0.0003233932,0.12900749,0.023862055,0.00014285222,0.000010044748,0.84105486,0.0037359064,0.00003426789,0.000057690446,0.0001273189,0.00055065576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000062319894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012422387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1242369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008029424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013976771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8352392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6926570324","doi":"10.25549/wpacards-m55711","title":"WPA household census for 107 S ST LOUIS ST, Los Angeles","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"University of Southern California Digital Library","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"St louis; Census; Population; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.01921302028480333,"score_gpt":0.19789833803129547,"score_spread":0.17868531774649216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6926570324","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018450683,0.00024325596,0.000060051574,0.00009596065,0.0001650132,0.00037513717,0.99415654,0.0001473321,0.002911659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006345094,0.00019087948,0.00015813865,0.00011570715,0.00046490965,5.495566e-7,0.9970068,0.000049214494,0.0013792932],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982885,0.00007045662,0.00023058025,0.00038346904,0.00044826654,0.0005787111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987155,0.00016544457,0.000310351,0.00038349244,0.00007056097,0.00035463384],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013040169,0.0003246514,0.0004282738,0.00022124441,0.00044567362,0.000198497,0.0009436297,0.00052831887,0.00046938413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040598563,0.0003552892,0.0003233517,0.00030744253,0.00061083265,0.00043965277,0.0002975878,0.00025605195,0.00020222364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007249611,0.00017610835,0.0043042987,0.00015254738,0.00007701885,0.00001549363,0.0001489554,0.0000031427628,2.3619306e-7,0.0000694687,0.9945808,0.00039940822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032516292,0.000020860729,0.000034854573,0.00005732688,0.00012184594,6.811706e-7,0.015151906,0.000005722709,3.5594041e-7,0.00040186054,0.9834806,0.00039885784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000480197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001865692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015002951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008054685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034705686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6926609975","doi":"10.25384/sage.24037533","title":"sj-docx-1-psg-10.1177_22925503231195020 - Supplemental material for Current Practices and Trends of Plastic and Oncoplastic Breast Surgeons in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sage Journals Data","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plastic surgery; Current (fluid); Oncoplastic Surgery; Breast surgery; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.0602100853038753,"score_gpt":0.35277141597712436,"score_spread":0.2925613306732491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6926609975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9408763,0.0010756131,0.00004047591,0.00089633465,0.0015125768,0.0001894868,0.055303052,0.000015331147,0.000090827096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99170154,0.006419606,0.00007316191,0.000017708693,0.00021756222,0.000009063367,0.0014494116,0.000014706826,0.00009724111],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819684,0.00016631273,0.00043344524,0.0003108072,0.00043266147,0.00045992373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982209,0.00087732944,0.00041172293,0.00021977456,0.000058177375,0.00021207018],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011683163,0.00014475203,0.0002849665,0.00020906643,0.00027249797,0.00015159098,0.00037483964,0.000049703107,0.0017817814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054194476,0.00013866476,0.00002476899,0.00046649188,0.00011738992,0.00052517414,0.00027037656,0.0001448686,0.0000015118117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002672139,0.00019580073,0.83717984,0.00024671218,0.00016791442,0.0000811405,0.0047767987,0.00004007351,0.00047980223,0.00014331509,0.06422889,0.09219252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016286345,0.000076117176,0.9321465,0.00030459478,0.00014771652,0.000032586995,0.021421704,0.0030095712,0.000008503979,0.00025186478,0.040641088,0.00033114376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4722058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9494295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47722372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001383201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010525845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6928994529","doi":"10.4224/physreva.96.042113.data","title":"Quantum simulations of an electron in a two dimensional potential well","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Electron; Quantum; Artificial neural network; Partial differential equation; Computer simulation; Differential equation","score_opus":0.018970847038064474,"score_gpt":0.34487702202908227,"score_spread":0.3259061749910178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6928994529","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09763651,0.000039224422,0.000018695971,0.00007670247,0.0007001615,0.00025205672,0.90028924,0.000018368122,0.0009690668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19232877,0.00006127522,0.00008998797,0.000067461566,0.0002428917,0.000002823763,0.80661696,0.000008402798,0.0005814474],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984073,0.0001851316,0.0002773279,0.00029407884,0.0004848164,0.00035132267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990406,0.00006924531,0.00020831494,0.00046179775,0.00011761444,0.00010242828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003928271,0.00015649268,0.00027419865,0.00017229447,0.00035677452,0.0000618197,0.0005515201,0.0002275567,0.00038425624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008729505,0.00015282069,0.00007479141,0.00012449431,0.0002121813,0.00017287073,0.00006786313,0.00026873144,0.000045422417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003142966,0.00046717614,0.0006799127,0.000024020026,0.000034552955,0.0000197131,0.00047731388,0.0074725393,0.00006175004,0.0034362432,0.9872588,0.000036582944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001512864,0.00020325524,0.011972764,0.000063240266,0.00015183703,0.0000017966927,0.0013759068,0.026848579,0.000005355676,0.012243875,0.94473875,0.00088175107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051862653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22129677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16943412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076478194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006405262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9544511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931021887","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.3740296","title":"Graduation: A Board Game that Teaches the Value of Information","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Graduation (instrument); Frame (networking); Value of information; Association (psychology); Higher education; Complete information","score_opus":0.04353645601581241,"score_gpt":0.25841620209415134,"score_spread":0.21487974607833893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931021887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017673806,0.00012523931,0.0058031725,0.0025685066,0.0002229603,0.0006323329,0.00029399636,0.0006667229,0.98951036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5613418,0.008018713,0.0031516606,0.0033421062,0.0036610728,7.234275e-7,0.012092846,0.01563117,0.3927599],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980613,0.0005485827,0.00022308112,0.00019990391,0.0007096262,0.00025751957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989925,0.000028353092,0.0002959152,0.0003368869,0.00022723482,0.00011909613],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069551595,0.00014358645,0.00017378938,0.00019301048,0.0011029361,0.00050121074,0.0011558275,0.00015125223,0.0070091924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057353923,0.0001262739,0.00007268765,0.0005588908,0.00039437256,0.000212995,0.00042700054,0.00027948167,0.0028713893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010276635,0.000030458901,0.000019976602,0.00008530879,0.00005923764,9.561289e-7,0.029219612,0.000016564758,0.000014019149,0.062115174,0.8901772,0.018251235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016932076,0.00004727603,0.0006866952,0.000036704463,0.000024728255,0.0000018447669,0.008837207,0.00013513128,0.000003314499,0.00065072195,0.9892735,0.00013357303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005399381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011708717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59675044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102207094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020254402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6939324969","doi":"10.60692/2dgq4-2x226","title":"PROTOCOL: The impact of agricultural mechanisation on women's economic empowerment: A mixed‐methods systematic review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic impact analysis; Agriculture; Systematic review; Mechanization; Agricultural productivity; Impact assessment","score_opus":0.04138062464593982,"score_gpt":0.32700119315886167,"score_spread":0.28562056851292184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6939324969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8440239,0.000011126701,0.0037102033,0.00019922118,0.0012851534,0.13582195,0.00024988604,0.0006918643,0.0140067125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96826077,0.0000028276625,0.00005260199,0.00007548101,0.00005091479,0.03130874,0.000017390174,0.0000075719195,0.00022369831],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754757,0.0007782807,0.0008836788,0.00011763689,0.0003572991,0.00031550927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985587,0.00004991898,0.00080988096,0.00033681057,0.00015865301,0.000086009655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036379187,0.00017485212,0.0004317151,0.00015338183,0.00032073984,0.00015227588,0.00031519495,0.00009319751,0.000025005556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010709346,0.00009368098,0.0001857169,0.0004770176,0.000040714203,0.00044215133,0.00004013609,0.00007515795,0.00064982416],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000316407,0.0000069928437,0.0048264335,0.11271428,0.0002612078,5.29168e-7,0.8705507,0.0016589937,0.0000034565508,0.008904322,0.0009316937,0.000109761255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010934748,0.0003233932,0.12900749,0.023862055,0.00014285222,0.000010044748,0.84105486,0.0037359064,0.00003426789,0.000057690446,0.0001273189,0.00055065576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000062319894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012422387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1242369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008029424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013976771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8352392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6945265375","doi":"10.25318/36280001202300200001-fra","title":"Mesurer la valeur de la contribution des femmes à l’économie canadienne : nouveaux renseignements fondés sur des travaux récents","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Statistics Canada Dissemination","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Order (exchange); State (computer science); Research methodology; Gender relations","score_opus":0.014325366688948573,"score_gpt":0.2812577587528977,"score_spread":0.26693239206394914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6945265375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9735533,0.0007979647,0.007139432,0.00065903744,0.0018287578,0.00036966836,0.012958044,0.00006087695,0.0026328964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800849,0.0019391582,0.0014512116,0.00012627216,0.00012832231,0.000034903354,0.004022287,0.000044020027,0.0121689],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967754,0.00070684176,0.00046139187,0.00041242538,0.0004972075,0.0011467645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969032,0.0014977623,0.00022951543,0.0001961308,0.0006773767,0.00049605407],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015782963,0.00030511396,0.00029830952,0.00013127322,0.0010344755,0.00019117245,0.0002829716,0.00027010418,0.00015086046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022433633,0.00038009317,0.00004876278,0.0008781068,0.0008171161,0.0002506553,0.000044170254,0.00022969212,0.000009851439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000345737,0.0002110055,0.16924283,0.00039549023,0.00026535877,0.00037862972,0.03404406,0.0007135132,0.00040930076,0.31688052,0.41081366,0.06661108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005293914,0.000052850235,0.92411137,0.00016522987,0.00018247722,0.0000072570947,0.020661702,0.005358379,0.0000674292,0.030214913,0.018185522,0.00046350932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7838844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9822276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7548685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038156635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033371793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6962859855","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/n95gm","title":"American Exceptionalism Revisited: Tax Relief, Poverty Reduction, and the Politics of Child Tax Credits","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Science Framework","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; American exceptionalism; Tax credit; Poverty; Child poverty; Tax reform; Social policy; Cash; Politics","score_opus":0.015397671542790833,"score_gpt":0.3079733992766137,"score_spread":0.2925757277338229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6962859855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.611492,0.0010632833,0.014196373,0.21775053,0.003704095,0.0023883902,0.0003703324,0.00011200919,0.14892301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851358,0.0014934675,0.0054654498,0.0025262653,0.00064952613,0.000017644967,0.0000014413056,0.000010194691,0.0047002416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762505,0.0002337154,0.0002942378,0.00045751221,0.0009093096,0.0004801663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980918,0.00036215727,0.0002949939,0.00059885846,0.00042743163,0.00022474436],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029085479,0.0001266912,0.00026006933,0.000088632216,0.001837199,0.00034529512,0.0018649965,0.00009416735,0.00012117982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028643822,0.00007326101,0.000052147647,0.0016167386,0.0088527985,0.0007009046,0.00043304652,0.00019812476,0.000019099363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016919646,0.00003136065,0.008099884,0.0000030844112,0.000007959875,4.118738e-7,0.0074267657,0.000003016033,0.000104207735,0.9712596,0.009039621,0.004007187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011853914,0.00016216298,0.2191404,0.0005876881,0.000060053222,0.000020106396,0.040869787,0.0000629486,0.00011468643,0.47798154,0.259145,0.00067026494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035427546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000109733606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49327806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119114055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050592626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6969506175","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6760305","title":"Distribution. Ogilvie Mts, N Yukon, Canada. in Cricetidae","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Bijection, injection and surjection; Domain (mathematical analysis); Injective function","score_opus":0.0295281992326047,"score_gpt":0.2620237907985444,"score_spread":0.23249559156593969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6969506175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015828937,0.0004140682,0.00047347165,0.00070599886,0.0004553112,0.00044641495,0.0018337969,0.00047645436,0.9950362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0499582,0.0037403398,0.00009884825,0.0002690235,0.0011492525,1.3865102e-7,0.010412845,0.0063562766,0.92801505],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764264,0.00044722162,0.00020468688,0.00046253315,0.0006577203,0.0005851951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985729,0.000019536112,0.00021952981,0.0006100327,0.00033136725,0.00024663704],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072428165,0.00019972738,0.00023819302,0.00017469656,0.0027817695,0.000701215,0.0017309526,0.00022608595,0.013573982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011040544,0.00022770428,0.000044363296,0.0004000471,0.00033583125,0.000109748195,0.00057242427,0.00039014794,0.0017075122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004433493,0.00004211767,0.00003908648,0.000039223916,0.000020643984,0.000025329422,0.00075738144,0.000004256061,0.0000033657316,0.007338915,0.98215777,0.009567453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022898782,0.000021293208,0.0022827862,0.00007823221,0.000011051456,0.0000035855303,0.001065058,0.000015770966,5.265401e-7,0.00009416902,0.99594724,0.0002512759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23400326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12840396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10559931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077872333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011131081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6976637729","doi":"10.6068/dp14ba82dd09c97","title":"Most Recent Data (2005). Statistics Canada. CANSIM: Health - Disability | Country: Canada | Table: Participation and activity limitation, by age group and sex, household population aged 12 and over | Variable: Participation and activity limitation, 12 to 19 years, Both sexes | Units: # Persons, 2005. Data-Planet™ Statistical Ready Reference by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 075-001-109.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Data Planet","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Official statistics; Summary statistics; Socioeconomic status; Population; Health statistics; Economic statistics; Population statistics; Mental health","score_opus":0.057998463209295976,"score_gpt":0.29773296225555734,"score_spread":0.23973449904626137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6976637729","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038140366,0.0009203321,0.00015830007,0.000019301453,0.00024285044,0.0009831057,0.9971522,0.000051806062,0.00009066921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026410297,0.004863625,0.00027287955,0.0004435658,0.00011643236,0.000021157412,0.99113965,0.00007665484,0.00042500845],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585193,0.0009953676,0.0004882873,0.0011162658,0.00087143516,0.00067670207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656117,0.0008487757,0.0005057419,0.0012129501,0.000018173845,0.000853188],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015965926,0.0003965714,0.00057692337,0.000047997277,0.00048652393,0.00042025791,0.00045955242,0.00029051123,0.00009108213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029816406,0.00043544834,1.0667418e-7,0.00020565266,0.0002963798,0.00074080547,0.0003549428,0.00036293978,2.3451261e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000510491,0.00009613884,0.0056105414,0.00024694114,0.000074008305,0.00000959523,0.000090552036,0.000021680127,0.000002128813,0.00017651444,0.9927514,0.0008694066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047664807,0.00005346509,0.0067653717,0.000019070894,0.00018980734,0.0000024325118,0.00097382686,0.0040961006,3.4580103e-9,0.0000012451701,0.9869621,0.0004599442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99977183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060125845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047696347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005103788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980781148","doi":"","title":"Cooperação e conflitos nas regiões polares : um cenário para o século XXI","year":2016,"lang":"pt","type":"dissertation","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Chinese Arctic and Antarctic Administration; European Commission; Shaanxi Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Australian Centre for Advanced Photovoltaics; Arctic Institute of North America; Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis)","score_opus":0.031892593116718014,"score_gpt":0.28267508946952696,"score_spread":0.25078249635280897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980781148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3981468,0.008103319,0.004927268,0.046657767,0.030165512,0.006199782,0.002540757,0.0025077793,0.500751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96678215,0.003973578,0.0006981751,0.0005551251,0.0028415013,0.000495195,0.0023719922,0.00026853965,0.022013754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98721755,0.0019355443,0.0022968242,0.0026424066,0.0031427825,0.0027649093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99109894,0.0008767599,0.0018827135,0.0016563222,0.0026973437,0.001787912],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018307839,0.0019071508,0.0018788502,0.0010808433,0.004805086,0.0012348667,0.0026609323,0.0035052917,0.00031793097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017654217,0.0017854379,0.0010105633,0.0019211613,0.00019413268,0.0012836821,0.00039429477,0.002120347,0.00022608844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006592676,0.0011864385,0.004511072,0.00056439755,0.00095022435,0.0003797682,0.05151816,0.000030100742,0.005656886,0.92889047,0.0030091768,0.0026440118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021704934,0.00020995145,0.016805874,0.0010421668,0.00047625168,0.00022526608,0.030723223,0.00021823999,0.00049033586,0.00080171943,0.9445076,0.0023289085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060690996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004010882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9414984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020366902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052168975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981601001","doi":"","title":"Essays in environmental economics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The Atrium (University of Guelph)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Fuel tax; Fuel efficiency; Vehicle miles of travel; Gasoline; Range (aeronautics); Social cost; Marginal cost; Tax incentive","score_opus":0.013565083005913732,"score_gpt":0.21436375621148654,"score_spread":0.20079867320557282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981601001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9415882,0.0002669716,0.000009600244,0.00017688013,0.00038153524,0.00017222726,0.000056299927,0.000014831743,0.057333417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97121966,0.00933462,0.000073551666,0.00002092056,0.00006752685,2.1147234e-7,0.00020753918,0.000010879413,0.019065069],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992064,0.000105829255,0.00011062698,0.00019263123,0.00016968352,0.0002147866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994703,0.000059509264,0.00018986956,0.00020808788,0.000017818056,0.00005441196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023991027,0.00011949997,0.00021571651,0.000115281924,0.00045759865,0.000008968201,0.00060741545,0.00025864085,0.0001807752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009160098,0.00014067999,0.00013179565,0.00013886775,0.000282854,0.00012942265,0.000042765172,0.00022137514,0.0000539859],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004896893,0.00052921893,0.08278596,0.00014383736,0.00031343376,0.000102736296,0.8604784,0.0010007008,0.00346775,0.037220556,0.005833093,0.0076346486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003593968,0.000021112271,0.58906907,0.000013255637,0.000055754477,6.3944725e-7,0.39742705,0.00012444885,0.0000027996475,0.0013707647,0.01134219,0.00021353547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007901628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034470808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5062831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022856647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022199305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987144441","doi":"","title":"Senate on Keystone XL Pipeline Veto Override : CSPAN : March 7, 2015 12:03pm-12:14pm EST","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Pipeline (software); Pipeline transport; Keystone species; Oil exploration","score_opus":0.012291371177309445,"score_gpt":0.23335970947611187,"score_spread":0.22106833829880243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987144441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015856676,0.0003930269,0.0000021905257,0.0004948819,0.0010853907,0.0007599157,0.0005658264,0.00032269713,0.9962175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018484296,0.0010739244,0.0006903811,0.00061531895,0.00081479864,0.000018108187,0.0005718075,0.00017933336,0.9941879],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964161,0.0002843652,0.0008433183,0.00040344492,0.0013030125,0.00074974744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762094,0.00013375637,0.0007496096,0.0006263828,0.00042687982,0.0004424541],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010440161,0.00055425987,0.00069554243,0.00019482605,0.00024227118,0.00012304881,0.0007419573,0.0008537626,0.09034227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036231175,0.00056166906,0.00020335562,0.000029947623,0.0004301674,8.2667714e-7,0.00014371019,0.00056723016,0.012334302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101340374,0.000109488756,0.000013017795,0.00022432201,0.000059325648,0.000022169605,0.0021996251,0.0005008019,3.0769564e-7,0.0002083958,0.9960543,0.0005069384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007933524,0.00014919018,0.000026870332,0.00023119806,0.00006990073,0.00001532662,0.0029001604,0.000095763025,7.1860063e-7,0.000043943794,0.9950715,0.00060211954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046460874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04941416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07800797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002802844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035592853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6988073270","doi":"","title":"Women and the Canadian Welfare State: Challenges and Change","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Government (linguistics); Poverty; Welfare state; Public policy; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.04162944279670974,"score_gpt":0.23734426754544968,"score_spread":0.19571482474873994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6988073270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5586093,0.00004756583,0.0000014891331,0.009718097,0.00020548323,0.0006719735,0.00006384798,0.00017394539,0.4305083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62512857,0.3745414,0.00000848913,0.00012626585,0.000049159677,0.000004849767,0.0000038955764,0.000008134593,0.00012919442],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987742,0.00021476574,0.000060804803,0.0002552962,0.00018223448,0.00051272736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999452,0.00007676586,0.000036621772,0.0001512187,0.000069478774,0.0002139422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005113719,0.00011738563,0.00014482618,0.0029809752,0.0011575624,0.00008147412,0.00023378186,0.00009823914,0.000009050932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004728093,0.00010363255,0.000026394237,0.0030030392,0.00043747824,0.00024257424,0.00011369767,0.00013243976,0.0000079072815],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033542157,0.000011736506,0.002246053,0.00003256763,0.00004853351,0.000092618204,0.86626226,9.64292e-7,7.152749e-8,0.07954371,0.000052276067,0.051675644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005784773,0.000023176612,0.021560304,0.0000057206357,0.00001161132,8.115388e-7,0.11982071,0.00007421066,7.213285e-8,0.000047091115,0.8577492,0.0001286234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8958891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98644406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8576969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028552063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041240547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8903151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990865934","doi":"","title":"Essays on Female Labor Force Participation in Developed Countries","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberian dollar; Limiting; Public life; Research methodology","score_opus":0.04705698068963676,"score_gpt":0.33703600970728226,"score_spread":0.2899790290176455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990865934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86193204,0.0064042844,0.0004146319,0.00449669,0.0037411656,0.0004332952,0.00013635172,0.00027118446,0.122170374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98508996,0.004144556,0.00022405689,0.00087772135,0.0005473621,0.000100204146,0.000020631902,0.00006642471,0.008929066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709153,0.00041147287,0.00047701475,0.0005174398,0.00063242594,0.0008701365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859786,0.0006867693,0.00008519726,0.0002973428,0.0001550662,0.00017775285],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013109704,0.00031112332,0.00036190328,0.00017025412,0.0002768636,0.00030826748,0.00035835349,0.00033150593,0.00045944896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000302975,0.00030516332,0.000092305614,0.0013799707,0.0004950095,0.000514927,0.00007087184,0.00037207323,0.0011431545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002513719,0.00015791508,0.02957922,0.00020195988,0.00004959002,0.000053922755,0.12543066,0.00057602837,0.000031154203,0.83830166,0.00040225606,0.005190507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008896433,0.00028440094,0.10827964,0.0014595903,0.00020804685,0.0000039223223,0.12310655,0.0132060405,0.00034251457,0.05878782,0.6921673,0.0012645647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005913247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013842542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77951384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049134303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061667804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991621573","doi":"","title":"Household labor supply: Collective results for certain developed countries","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Munich University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Developed country; Developing country; Differential (mechanical device); Order (exchange); Aggregate data; Aggregate (composite)","score_opus":0.03055879268742614,"score_gpt":0.24766352631731978,"score_spread":0.21710473362989363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991621573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00097318017,0.00073569675,0.00072468905,0.0025140296,0.0005535511,0.0018689904,0.017426612,0.00060997636,0.9745933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024770175,0.0100948345,0.007675079,0.0005556313,0.00060929934,0.000015640437,0.0009195696,0.00038054527,0.9772724],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610204,0.0007089236,0.00033863948,0.0010790667,0.00078262965,0.0009886787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970777,0.0010750374,0.00045054377,0.0006054763,0.00029101438,0.0005002382],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045464805,0.0006047256,0.0007957504,0.00081167975,0.0015775219,0.00013482079,0.0016982857,0.00059439684,0.00022897212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060544396,0.00071862445,0.00035241278,0.0013599474,0.0011267315,0.00017103818,0.00047781566,0.0007030853,0.00003883212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013027292,0.00018140537,0.0041272235,0.00021956587,0.0008880215,0.0002632989,0.110017866,0.000015776803,0.000018470359,0.07431478,0.8083912,0.00025963323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020950083,0.00016126788,0.0012203346,0.00021989884,0.00018681004,0.0000017020873,0.04459699,0.00018896554,0.0000015272718,0.00046372745,0.95006424,0.00079951505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009963426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10988193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14167303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009185993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048570205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992273345","doi":"","title":"Labor Supply, Wealth Dynamics, and Marriage Decisions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Hyporeflexia; Proteogenomics; Dysgeusia; Demotion; Diafiltration; Liquation","score_opus":0.011435804534218427,"score_gpt":0.23526864440954867,"score_spread":0.22383283987533026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992273345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8680836,0.0005358987,0.00051138346,0.0028510087,0.00033335038,0.00037170105,0.0078281965,0.00045372636,0.119031124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98711604,0.0003577371,0.001707129,0.0008135333,0.00039179114,0.000014396263,0.0011743364,0.00007298654,0.008352042],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745905,0.00017315125,0.00046913707,0.00053669314,0.00056863204,0.0007933433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985192,0.0004047244,0.00013153501,0.00036015228,0.000071307695,0.0005131231],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037881683,0.00029886732,0.00030171406,0.00018882296,0.00077157735,0.002033931,0.00054676103,0.0002761232,0.000336881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004231638,0.00029354618,0.00012262419,0.00073880405,0.00039666073,0.0028758158,0.00023698011,0.000411537,0.00062556454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019483552,0.000121004254,0.84728587,0.00001094733,0.000012029043,0.000025314523,0.0001414126,0.0000040529426,0.000009826883,0.14346659,0.005032441,0.0038710546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079017656,0.000057845467,0.54089564,0.000072207564,0.000026558224,0.0000066233247,0.002227642,0.0005480511,0.000020972393,0.17410979,0.2804873,0.0007571761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029179282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008511973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30639017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010721814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003445297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000487096","doi":"","title":"FEMALE LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE FRAMEWORK OF KUZNETS CURVE: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Context (archaeology); Error correction model; Quarter (Canadian coin); Time series; Real gross domestic product; Kuznets curve","score_opus":0.06221048870583152,"score_gpt":0.3813446527386908,"score_spread":0.31913416403285927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000487096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919732,0.0001657233,0.0000066251746,0.0010219517,0.00019630372,0.00037497608,0.000029755429,0.0000100223115,0.0062214336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855792,0.013720352,0.00025978358,0.00007632888,0.00014159131,0.000054960085,0.0000034385369,0.00001529222,0.00014903197],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795765,0.0006671738,0.00035159622,0.00037820902,0.00016141687,0.00048396064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682975,0.0022364643,0.000189424,0.00057330733,0.00007305066,0.00009798385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042254627,0.00010985094,0.00023378473,0.00010036198,0.0004532288,0.00026439838,0.0007985922,0.00017800671,0.000021371783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030312988,0.00010119552,0.00004083317,0.00007959244,0.0007467576,0.0004775852,0.00015282293,0.00039074643,0.000004723341],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040505714,0.000033696648,0.96581143,0.000014997864,0.000011387677,0.0000034509244,0.020130994,0.0005063563,0.000052124306,0.008795291,0.000008159551,0.004591594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024250435,0.00003938226,0.97310555,0.00009837134,0.0000041234216,1.3893806e-7,0.011146558,0.0039984323,0.00004155861,0.010871655,0.00032955396,0.0001221615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010071151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021542065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013554628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002431173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003371316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7005479890","doi":"","title":"Rationing ‘Rights’: Supplementary Welfare Benefits and Lone Moms","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SOURCE Sheridan's Institutional Repository (Sheridan College)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationing; Welfare; Social policy; Welfare reform; Social Welfare; Welfare system; Social assistance; Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.01828093698228981,"score_gpt":0.22786822279035038,"score_spread":0.20958728580806057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7005479890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81931853,0.0005172282,0.00073623325,0.0004525706,0.0017808884,0.0005720388,0.00015379045,0.00019651178,0.1762722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98925704,0.0000783068,0.0034338923,0.0002251645,0.0007616284,0.00007665552,0.00007389566,0.000035884266,0.006057562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688655,0.0002532677,0.0005895663,0.0007037737,0.000885668,0.00068117696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985998,0.00006813564,0.00020882527,0.00038361683,0.00030330155,0.00043627512],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000522285,0.0003806117,0.0003484065,0.00015760267,0.0058238204,0.00019909863,0.00046115185,0.0002780745,0.00063585053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057035744,0.00039813368,0.00015096253,0.0004960744,0.0012728496,0.00059979357,0.00016251628,0.0003331622,0.00002177017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023012306,0.00044203486,0.11358098,0.0000726847,0.00029874343,0.00028733435,0.030060897,0.0012853659,0.000639132,0.8485895,0.002567114,0.0019461344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002640942,0.0003858208,0.20002683,0.00021025151,0.0002471076,0.00030693947,0.0663796,0.0014321738,0.0008958947,0.0033707789,0.7221518,0.0019518308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008349745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003170238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84521866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004551555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006375988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009269506","doi":"","title":"The empowerment of women A study of women's participation in training programs in Manitoba","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Training (meteorology); Empowerment; Program evaluation; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.03844316128871851,"score_gpt":0.31105072682439183,"score_spread":0.27260756553567334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009269506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73701954,0.000016879409,0.0010031168,0.00005568497,0.00035014478,0.011960147,0.000024388735,0.00012405732,0.24944602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98791885,0.00025553798,0.0007311069,0.00006728682,0.000024052146,0.005295266,0.00004531658,0.00004358417,0.005618997],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966001,0.0005246397,0.0009871575,0.0002519376,0.00082173495,0.00081443135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859565,0.00006501397,0.0006533622,0.0004247157,0.00011761431,0.00014365655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008294215,0.00022471377,0.00043265085,0.0007582072,0.00019844018,0.0002346996,0.00070748595,0.00028849498,0.000104564206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023532857,0.00019887474,0.00005277432,0.0013719306,0.00036609723,0.00069817645,0.000083890285,0.00031558936,0.000008100978],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005880119,0.00077653216,0.01699981,0.00023851074,0.00003663523,0.000005189799,0.892795,0.00024219195,0.00003060627,0.0057365373,0.0011985007,0.08188169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013923884,0.00026994353,0.016447648,0.0010793584,0.000014413128,7.844063e-7,0.47964647,0.00021589609,0.000045468103,0.0008805174,0.4994721,0.0005350055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006492379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08670948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4982736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013566116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001105081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9814578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010085356","doi":"","title":"Forces of Change : Mapping the Adoption and Enactment of Welfare-To-Work Policies in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Field (mathematics); Public policy; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.03662183253309496,"score_gpt":0.2744501368921793,"score_spread":0.23782830435908434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010085356","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021504108,0.00047826167,0.023005446,0.005384607,0.0010578219,0.017603947,0.0003868964,0.00017699646,0.9304019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600813,0.0031968264,0.01193204,0.002590144,0.00014903132,0.0013290992,0.00017051854,0.00008175223,0.020469313],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982297,0.00015345939,0.0005108529,0.00017102815,0.0006033753,0.00033161978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988871,0.000036880047,0.00050154875,0.00030730254,0.00016628104,0.00010084009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019915919,0.00019048338,0.0003028604,0.00060618523,0.00021106395,0.00011425777,0.0005107945,0.00020285549,0.00006259113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013479897,0.00016132779,0.000045458335,0.0010593656,0.00021351072,0.00051770115,0.00010267578,0.00018946864,0.0000020749997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059481852,0.00016840835,0.03345704,0.0023199331,0.00011078364,0.000011413818,0.2678081,0.00073439704,0.0002883855,0.26101062,0.17773518,0.25629625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017168943,0.000019312287,0.03669422,0.0012730677,0.000013128703,0.000001306294,0.014036943,0.000054144897,0.00018332207,0.00020733228,0.94704676,0.00029879576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76799196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8884221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9385772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053756876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012178381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6578756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018786405","doi":"","title":"Equal Pay Day Canada 2020: Gender Wage Gap","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.029773560509776323,"score_gpt":0.26246080610901557,"score_spread":0.23268724559923926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018786405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4136341,0.001579807,0.00177371,0.020561818,0.005329547,0.00095267507,0.00044914335,0.00058055535,0.55513865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816941,0.00013558628,0.0003506514,0.012847399,0.001381676,0.000012655364,0.000035921472,0.000032117943,0.0035098896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973611,0.00030079822,0.00030691337,0.000476334,0.00081455236,0.0007402538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984927,0.00012729237,0.00009152343,0.0003008468,0.00012323924,0.00086437113],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042990476,0.00022114457,0.0002669751,0.000016228325,0.0007085897,0.0001711131,0.0006040684,0.00016519145,0.0014170943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030155055,0.00019696252,0.00009468071,0.00044312398,0.00018597473,0.00024743757,0.000111838584,0.0004399446,0.00033523928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003088044,0.00009662108,0.081752144,0.000068470625,0.00016277094,0.00034601561,0.028232666,0.00040671576,0.0006280415,0.62850773,0.2586164,0.0011515556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058130536,0.000044438413,0.019489564,0.000010650148,0.000042509168,0.0000013512566,0.023356877,0.00030360723,0.00003980602,0.0033510795,0.9521425,0.00063631195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6377416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89177436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6935261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027642795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016961419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028929820","doi":"","title":"Greatest Hits: Modern diets are making us fat: A Canadian author explains food cravings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Food supply; Perspective (graphical); Consumption (sociology)","score_opus":0.013579812160246873,"score_gpt":0.21510915601418173,"score_spread":0.20152934385393487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028929820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00065620826,0.00042067195,9.159777e-7,0.0004520226,0.0007116192,0.00063867215,0.0011068453,0.00025212544,0.9957609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037502244,0.0002381856,0.00034839686,0.0008171818,0.00028173614,0.00004389529,0.00025693743,0.00016146745,0.96035],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744177,0.0001784186,0.00057274837,0.00033802917,0.0007178569,0.00075117924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825597,0.000088817156,0.0006959624,0.00041373426,0.00018233752,0.00036316682],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000387335,0.00041138392,0.00048012732,0.00022540324,0.0006580658,0.00016231745,0.00070710893,0.0005770708,0.24951595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002445375,0.00047351466,0.00019272848,0.000033067034,0.00021447593,6.811038e-7,0.00012234971,0.00046135974,0.0015536234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012427997,0.000025469017,0.0004282277,0.00017352999,0.0000695244,0.000042148207,0.006764266,0.00032589378,2.9197379e-8,0.0002837665,0.99132735,0.00054736127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026466823,0.00009471007,0.0002626817,0.00016679498,0.000057296216,0.000013603053,0.007890897,0.000066415974,6.118312e-8,0.0000625422,0.9906158,0.0005045492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.402271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85716087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4548899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051457994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030394693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029624508","doi":"","title":"Les mécanismes de résolutions du diabète de type 2 induits par la chirurgie bariatrique","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Knowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Hormonal therapy; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.0177486726517233,"score_gpt":0.22830493396728535,"score_spread":0.21055626131556204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029624508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21241282,0.010968441,0.01852236,0.0004209676,0.0013480252,0.00045027744,0.00013133822,0.0000690294,0.75567675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8776712,0.0055171777,0.006085289,0.000032175794,0.00045140673,8.0244666e-7,0.000026507252,0.000048159778,0.11016727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780023,0.0006415301,0.0002905583,0.00035462333,0.00044075112,0.00047229225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856806,0.0001506641,0.00023001888,0.00033298187,0.00043500346,0.00028326001],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006308049,0.00034408947,0.0004826024,0.00017950159,0.001131048,0.000026969768,0.0012548121,0.000830537,0.0003876732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017730125,0.00035275132,0.00034154524,0.00067872764,0.002799838,0.00016306917,0.00037440643,0.0004883699,0.00008195552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014670126,0.0014201319,0.1142721,0.0024490175,0.0011264195,0.00005325166,0.09531453,0.039597694,0.005221045,0.69879705,0.038898125,0.0027038995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008434307,0.00009332312,0.17161877,0.002098938,0.000661008,0.000027902606,0.0024330998,0.004269975,0.00025419795,0.0029529976,0.8142303,0.000516031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022039652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12059854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7753322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003084487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033925287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043239823","doi":"","title":"Second Class Citizenship: An Examination of Women and Minorities, Victims of the American Welfare State","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Welfare; Value (mathematics); Payment; Welfare state; Social Welfare; Social class; Race (biology); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.03844968892891404,"score_gpt":0.3379992949934544,"score_spread":0.29954960606454034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043239823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98291874,0.00045504057,0.000048999897,0.0003312743,0.00013666357,0.0008717802,0.00021294906,0.000042989737,0.014981569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99202305,0.00091504236,0.0004107447,0.000066902874,0.00010151358,0.000105422616,0.000017534616,0.000037524962,0.0063222554],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909002,0.0050942195,0.0005418383,0.0006056651,0.0018268425,0.0010312054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99607354,0.0008375498,0.00045471682,0.00065782666,0.0014255542,0.00055078644],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005983981,0.00027486813,0.0005445403,0.00042230583,0.0017506029,0.00016457413,0.0007895419,0.00021243322,0.00046664404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012487879,0.00022204331,0.00009932861,0.0023542177,0.0030881658,0.00075102336,0.0003420258,0.0010611225,0.00000241965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016251209,0.0008672543,0.5282134,0.0002620219,0.00023042894,0.00007686482,0.352785,0.00016483851,0.016786208,0.029320264,0.0013096557,0.068358995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076083106,0.00033444224,0.709709,0.00028417754,0.000009075874,0.0000020159005,0.2777375,0.00008167486,0.001208387,0.0051772925,0.004447217,0.00024840934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002072429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1814956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051608897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047585266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7044334301","doi":"","title":"When work empowers : women in Mexico's City's labour force","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Development Research Centre; McGill University","keywords":"Work (physics); Power (physics); Public policy","score_opus":0.01582656808698449,"score_gpt":0.2623694020098538,"score_spread":0.24654283392286933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7044334301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7770467,0.00029730645,3.0891323e-7,0.00006379195,0.0026108967,0.00086509396,0.00049242825,0.00030520046,0.21831831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91259336,0.0007815832,0.0004155787,0.00065076555,0.00012727626,0.00025320405,0.00052753545,0.00021308096,0.08443762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99249995,0.0007546702,0.0011342407,0.001484457,0.0017322865,0.0023943994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967708,0.00028547036,0.00065778126,0.00084312545,0.0005212398,0.0009215611],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030366292,0.0009653139,0.0011213407,0.00077120104,0.0020724596,0.0002978424,0.0016544989,0.0018849239,0.000779576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013814244,0.0011413987,0.0004068704,0.002029785,0.0002134927,0.0010567212,0.00014386403,0.0023266475,0.00027850695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090943184,0.0013128603,0.025450611,0.0007877164,0.00072409573,0.000494817,0.019183237,0.00062837196,0.001523996,0.89231783,0.00005880947,0.056608245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035361587,0.0002743522,0.09110079,0.0013337984,0.00018264327,0.0000049615996,0.10954307,0.0000048952834,0.0006133777,0.5455402,0.24367663,0.004189137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072802645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065453604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34677762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057353587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070760003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071930437","doi":"","title":"What do we learn when we \"count women's work?\"","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Consortium pour la recherche économique en Afrique; International Development Research Centre; United Nations Population Fund; Bill and Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; European Commission; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Set (abstract data type); Focus (optics); Work (physics); Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.017153001134925638,"score_gpt":0.23392286600978346,"score_spread":0.21676986487485783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071930437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9365385,0.001635812,0.00024423003,0.02423183,0.0013311129,0.00026552574,0.000013022636,0.00014634908,0.035593573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8289904,0.015832044,0.0018812749,0.00022980743,0.00025159706,6.582595e-7,0.0000050159715,0.000027456488,0.15278172],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976285,0.00027400436,0.00010821604,0.0004935442,0.00077304133,0.0007226786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852794,0.00007477169,0.00018563583,0.0005008942,0.00036792285,0.0003428088],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009294046,0.00020516309,0.00030936312,0.00021769681,0.0017208533,0.00025425322,0.00087716343,0.00029586075,0.002026726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046126228,0.00026101305,0.0001446182,0.00066727895,0.0010592793,0.0019945432,0.00041275081,0.000347867,0.00086402515],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004197042,0.0003339749,0.112224616,0.00011236189,0.0003164604,0.00011477471,0.73410445,0.000034233908,0.00077814056,0.063648455,0.058160473,0.029752376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043051728,0.00008058041,0.011783107,0.0000901659,0.000026643575,8.249196e-7,0.4229966,0.000008946068,0.0000043813598,0.0022270437,0.56211174,0.00023944819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005667029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006331852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50395125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067950296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023612188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7072011969","doi":"","title":"The Taxation of Women in Canada: A Research Report","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Commission; Double taxation; Tax reform; Direct tax; State income tax; International taxation; Tax credit","score_opus":0.016059884854618227,"score_gpt":0.23101285495395515,"score_spread":0.21495297009933692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7072011969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9286196,0.000009801789,0.0000072383204,0.039171856,0.00016150337,0.00019207435,0.000019182557,0.000022139642,0.03179657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91085094,0.00014632316,0.0000454145,0.000045470268,0.000019683031,0.0000021149567,0.000009275108,0.000006058648,0.08887472],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977222,0.0007769708,0.00010752249,0.00018011265,0.00070176774,0.00051142136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991522,0.0002729122,0.00014859854,0.00022830228,0.00006408199,0.00013393266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009252644,0.000054787342,0.000106734646,0.00015551512,0.0011438674,0.000025246058,0.0005178056,0.00003278559,0.00016880519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001859663,0.000057498622,0.000027110731,0.0013883752,0.00018416994,0.00032842316,0.00031867667,0.00029728195,0.0000010695011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007375622,0.000051716004,0.7991406,0.000009182659,0.000021346292,0.00044065263,0.035619263,0.00050360756,0.00000275883,0.058018856,0.10591903,0.00019922631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012763607,0.00002360596,0.21755864,0.0000026262483,0.000001801105,1.2716478e-7,0.33732563,0.000020140102,0.0000046518094,0.00097250973,0.44389126,0.0000713721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9855052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8561615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58158195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026931157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071889935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7083882188","doi":"","title":"1/9: Guide Live - outdoor skating, Calpurnia at HOB, jewelry show, the King's bday","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Internet Archive (Internet Archive)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thursday; Blues; Happening; Shot (pellet); Launched; The arts","score_opus":0.016225694434933505,"score_gpt":0.269771674393433,"score_spread":0.25354597995849953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7083882188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003828809,0.00080369227,0.0038310913,0.0005802977,0.0048416196,0.0019432567,0.0013815094,0.0005941393,0.98219556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016670978,0.0009978119,0.001453554,0.0015973388,0.0026112234,0.00013662822,0.0006035776,0.00082689285,0.975102],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923998,0.0015305417,0.0011011576,0.0017446941,0.0014331716,0.0017906259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954199,0.0012659052,0.0010902331,0.0015268007,0.0001175001,0.00057965954],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009434858,0.0012399695,0.0011907299,0.0006273442,0.00031946128,0.00046943154,0.004028309,0.0005733946,0.010663763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045095017,0.000990661,0.00091713434,0.0002483472,0.0021031082,0.00013904883,0.0021164785,0.0016468801,0.011051784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007836867,0.000120267774,0.009662895,0.00010661326,0.0005651712,0.00009014163,0.06865572,0.000012956348,0.00006524456,0.009811691,0.91031444,0.0005165137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067691837,0.00021460725,0.0027364648,0.00091484736,0.0001806605,0.000021981554,0.0047990372,0.0012024196,0.000012392934,0.0013197929,0.98675084,0.0011700416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22590052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48527506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25937453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041059568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005494431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095124116","doi":"","title":"The Identification of Fixed Costs from Consumer Behaviour","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Subsistence agriculture; Fixed cost; Consumer expenditure; Identification (biology); Class (philosophy); Consumer Expenditure Survey","score_opus":0.020185710798444927,"score_gpt":0.29449139948192665,"score_spread":0.2743056886834817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095124116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812489,0.00021254622,0.000595336,0.0010273379,0.00033795374,0.000119757024,0.000024300958,0.000030799296,0.01640305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929923,0.0002995009,0.00028218617,0.00008990609,0.00010147834,0.0000044816366,0.0000088024535,0.0000033272927,0.0062180227],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931455,0.00007224887,0.00019214104,0.00009110233,0.00020800674,0.00012194462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994856,0.00013201928,0.00008089867,0.00015431346,0.00010942849,0.00003770809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038871725,0.000038984002,0.000053086453,0.0000127230605,0.00029806953,0.000049333492,0.000191029,0.000051184783,0.000090302616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000793557,0.000028720693,0.000030174917,0.00009623896,0.00017580975,0.00007836001,0.000013995043,0.000041588344,0.0000694687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010885621,0.0001526935,0.79537636,0.0000016173443,0.000043569125,4.4422367e-7,0.023417061,0.000018285918,0.006125739,0.12229964,0.01189508,0.04065865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022734757,0.000006484188,0.9222153,0.0000033221936,0.0000328011,6.799722e-8,0.035091214,0.00049485604,0.0009880892,0.0015605213,0.039261978,0.00011801107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006549548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02228064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12683897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047678124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065407745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99556017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095162183","doi":"","title":"Boy-Girl Differences in Parental Time Investments: Evidence from Three Countries,” NBER Working Paper No","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Test (biology); Reading (process); Correlation; Time preference; Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.03701381967943508,"score_gpt":0.26028130690662005,"score_spread":0.22326748722718498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095162183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9499179,0.00068908517,0.00008534332,0.0009050242,0.00060805405,0.00041198533,0.000009273639,0.00009386818,0.04727945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913852,0.0007357323,0.00088621915,0.0017737064,0.0002631534,0.00005511697,0.000012417729,0.000013187177,0.004875245],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802476,0.00016347588,0.00031664924,0.0003891263,0.0005749178,0.00053108705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990098,0.0003768333,0.00008738594,0.00023958218,0.00011231837,0.00017410255],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032588397,0.00019423594,0.0002564701,0.00005791603,0.00029637793,0.00032397138,0.0004888814,0.0001721363,0.0057814503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018594322,0.00015940273,0.00005470883,0.00029090088,0.00026344624,0.00088448374,0.00010900873,0.00017124145,0.0024027235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005495555,0.00004379346,0.9883185,0.0000025792442,0.000017475191,0.0000026751277,0.006021953,0.000001214773,0.000112235015,0.0020072223,0.0029166494,0.00055022526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024683733,0.000022251988,0.9786543,0.00012258616,0.0000116804,1.2232351e-7,0.006964665,0.00077005156,0.0000028492334,0.00999262,0.0029352996,0.00027669684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055172496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048266545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042404205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018183739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018680499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99837404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095211839","doi":"","title":"women’s quality of life in Canada and four comparison nations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Quality of life (healthcare); Social Welfare; Social policy; Developed country; Welfare state; Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.059538909348577106,"score_gpt":0.31358955487322765,"score_spread":0.25405064552465056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095211839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9449701,0.0000393518,0.000109449735,0.00014678208,0.00009680368,0.000053718064,0.000005448166,0.0000046961673,0.054573666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988997,0.000036548267,0.00024410427,0.00018143808,0.0000059272434,0.0000038687926,4.9914297e-7,0.0000015046238,0.0006263896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992789,0.00014877935,0.00017791406,0.000070460366,0.00018028707,0.00014365307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996294,0.00014075504,0.000042840795,0.00005279614,0.000047657988,0.00008655788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049811753,0.000032751504,0.000113381815,0.00003190964,0.00008808332,0.000008450213,0.00005151099,0.000024933779,0.00007536275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000404103,0.000032365926,0.000006886103,0.00021473915,0.00004522117,0.000036678306,0.000005974046,0.000039467388,4.4156045e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.4756074e-7,0.0000134787615,0.88464284,0.000004339786,0.0000023826963,8.615157e-8,0.0084948735,0.000035074794,0.0000031700351,0.10659733,0.00016741222,0.00003834881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013940336,0.0000035059709,0.8565345,0.0000010541924,6.2616357e-7,1.6746455e-8,0.13965993,0.000106316336,0.0000010631718,0.0013119351,0.0021930924,0.00004854786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9871355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99970055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13116506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028552118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015870092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28152862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095840740","doi":"","title":"2001 and of a chapter of the dissertation, The Intimate Negotiations of Gendered Citizenship in a Global Context: Welfare Reform in the Netherlands and the United States.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Negotiation; Welfare reform; Permission; Welfare","score_opus":0.02438859881549885,"score_gpt":0.27609510088791495,"score_spread":0.25170650207241607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095840740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761509,0.00022379815,0.00003456306,0.008321807,0.000026972692,0.0003737085,0.000037044647,0.0000038478415,0.0148273725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894017,0.0005657305,0.000016929569,0.000360064,0.0000052235273,0.000008648995,0.0000039960264,0.0000029899193,0.00009625961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901605,0.0002711804,0.00027658517,0.00008539167,0.00020404441,0.00014674671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999385,0.00017347817,0.00014112072,0.00017357738,0.00010808807,0.000018727134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081602315,0.000072189105,0.00013572944,0.000035720674,0.00019642898,0.000022569124,0.000252116,0.00004851292,0.000029365096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000107323984,0.00002937438,0.000031325926,0.0006087539,0.000667193,0.000036168927,0.00003076809,0.000082723986,1.1567355e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039602062,0.00004096214,0.2908208,0.000015873711,0.000026690423,2.5239487e-7,0.23161392,0.0001084499,0.0000057731027,0.47646546,0.000039352894,0.0008228563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007717508,0.000015865222,0.6689431,0.0000124052585,0.0000147351675,5.425681e-7,0.31078938,0.0071693626,0.0000022233767,0.012161577,0.00007850524,0.000040533676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032487143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1171912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46430388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025107056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018380531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97395563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096282965","doi":"","title":"TITLE Single Parents &amp;apos; Attitudes toward and Use of Government and Community Assistance: A Needs Assessment To Plan Interventions That Preserve Family Function and Lower the","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Welfare; Single mothers; Psychological intervention; Quarter (Canadian coin); Needs assessment; Social Welfare; Welfare reform","score_opus":0.24610049582822435,"score_gpt":0.3712559971997075,"score_spread":0.12515550137148312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096282965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98483765,0.000100305566,0.004052647,0.00032040372,0.0001545078,0.0001413707,0.00006398474,0.000011103643,0.010318017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99435484,0.00021762036,0.00039763545,0.0000866753,0.000012061779,0.000006389404,0.0000017820745,0.0000034839964,0.0049195313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994276,0.00014081738,0.00008335026,0.00006772068,0.0001931059,0.000087394714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996178,0.00014599432,0.00003702504,0.00011911617,0.000028003606,0.000052038755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031525924,0.00005199169,0.00007011172,0.000015239069,0.00020919311,0.000074570315,0.00006842825,0.00003271287,0.000056108744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038146834,0.000031121766,0.000020974427,0.000053373336,0.00012186646,0.00011701651,0.00009955396,0.000055062723,0.0000018611917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026100486,0.00025390988,0.97807115,0.00004334289,0.000059978243,1.2602106e-7,0.005372984,6.5898206e-7,0.0008027141,0.0062393607,0.004669757,0.004459885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015790599,0.00010392976,0.9631163,0.00006273224,0.000021888533,1.3179448e-7,0.0132099,0.000004916634,0.0000046153436,0.00041746462,0.02284149,0.000058707705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011853004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007652207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018171733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049337355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001423407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4270111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096319431","doi":"","title":"The Household Revolution: Childcare, Housework, and Female Labor Force Participation,” Cahiers de recherche 2013-07, Universite de Montreal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Wage; Production (economics); Work (physics); Relative price; Construct (python library); Total fertility rate; Population","score_opus":0.05894718493339093,"score_gpt":0.2985779036635278,"score_spread":0.2396307187301369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096319431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.959056,0.000745013,0.0031529483,0.004184369,0.00012472393,0.00034902067,0.000011075662,0.00024019167,0.032136664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9544021,0.006922029,0.0030406618,0.0009538126,0.00016074907,0.000026975622,0.0000033116532,0.00002366509,0.034466714],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998276,0.00063977827,0.00013991319,0.00019999767,0.00019822597,0.000546073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882555,0.00050098763,0.000063366155,0.00021603765,0.00014172858,0.00025230183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001353323,0.00011321425,0.00010669849,0.0000324695,0.00094948953,0.00015821433,0.00024373543,0.0003169523,0.0000324306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029910702,0.000090497626,0.00004314885,0.00033250474,0.0004293482,0.00029044453,0.00003332275,0.00030726235,0.00002006596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003291426,0.000099735604,0.6641701,0.000019455612,0.00011520148,0.0000058842033,0.11858468,0.0009371222,0.00012440143,0.14842993,0.05930029,0.008180275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040344556,0.00004252421,0.8777963,0.000013881725,0.000056565288,0.0000016185809,0.08339822,0.0020067734,0.000012165247,0.019669183,0.016333882,0.00026541762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03415185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034443907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2136262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000474365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031113368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.983175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096373819","doi":"","title":"© notice, is given to the source. Maternity Leave and Children’s Cognitive and Behavioral Development","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Developing country; Subject (documents); Maternity leave; Developed country; Cognitive development","score_opus":0.04143955874333002,"score_gpt":0.28200588920340974,"score_spread":0.24056633046007972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096373819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893545,0.000029822782,0.00061118935,0.00026325893,0.00007950289,0.00028943826,0.000015734136,0.00003240225,0.009324174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951383,0.000036587982,0.00090906647,0.0009654938,0.000040015413,0.000011383977,0.0000022848672,0.000006733795,0.0028901275],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992686,0.000056570276,0.00009731726,0.00018582011,0.00016630228,0.00022542487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968296,0.000023748182,0.00002726977,0.00006403447,0.00006889833,0.00013306722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024844147,0.00009062248,0.000085718006,0.00002851294,0.00051426596,0.000072356095,0.00011008124,0.00006082417,0.00016381836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014423079,0.000064806714,0.000013404553,0.00007504612,0.00017675222,0.00007339533,0.000102564554,0.000071646464,0.00004913643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007987658,0.00004051935,0.74073017,0.0000014989611,0.000014713437,7.8399034e-7,0.2512669,6.7451715e-8,0.0000025766083,0.0003099193,0.0002377676,0.0073870732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014153581,0.000032851764,0.9475615,0.000005812332,0.000023594013,0.000001165422,0.05034809,0.0000043912364,0.000070867376,0.000091566304,0.0015973389,0.00012130003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070680887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008550118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20683129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021385697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054091874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096523287","doi":"","title":"SOCIAL RESEARCH AND DEMONSTRATION","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Disadvantaged; Corporation; Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Research program; Social research","score_opus":0.11978732648632442,"score_gpt":0.40731839506586515,"score_spread":0.2875310685795407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096523287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6238336,0.000020214697,0.00034895126,0.0019890326,0.000040667324,0.00005427267,3.1364806e-7,0.000025738665,0.3736872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876362,0.00023684198,0.00022230615,0.00007826197,0.00023111283,0.0000024417677,0.0000012159594,0.000002343937,0.01158924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930465,0.000092562674,0.000052780662,0.0000921771,0.00025508288,0.00020271986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997472,0.000051880856,0.000007755076,0.000033141663,0.00010853291,0.000051463478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007037103,0.000026223224,0.00003563046,0.00003753102,0.00085940916,0.00007800924,0.000060828213,0.00006578081,0.000077385725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004163215,0.000025049385,0.00000873816,0.0002502064,0.0002799312,0.00009733219,0.000014940397,0.000076490105,0.000022071332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039447373,0.000030153895,0.20693664,0.0000013933367,0.0000030879826,0.000002438061,0.015817238,2.647618e-7,0.00011847969,0.76754606,0.0035184303,0.0060218936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031936876,0.000069990274,0.5809673,0.0000027199019,0.000004491566,0.0000018262668,0.15431191,0.00033781075,0.00000924087,0.1623024,0.10149258,0.0001803705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014828738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073604085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6052436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028938102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008480534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66099674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096534166","doi":"","title":"Medicaid and Mothers ’ Employment and Wages","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicaid; Welfare; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Health insurance; Government (linguistics); Welfare reform","score_opus":0.017737285971960434,"score_gpt":0.2849480683103513,"score_spread":0.26721078233839085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096534166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9029287,0.00045275086,0.00026220077,0.0059797466,0.000070827366,0.0000754379,0.0000015718392,0.000049234342,0.09017955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98710114,0.0013520742,0.0013424297,0.001010095,0.00011794581,0.0000021606072,4.7646546e-7,0.0000042090956,0.00906947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995086,0.000028049602,0.000061024497,0.00010746118,0.0001487288,0.00014611799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997805,0.000033119937,0.000012628265,0.0000496833,0.000013540142,0.000110567824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022129266,0.000045716315,0.000057058514,0.000019261033,0.0001689632,0.000036633304,0.000050526978,0.000043915068,0.00014561473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019893463,0.000037239617,0.0000087409635,0.000046935067,0.00018658981,0.00007476231,0.000019461766,0.000033079396,0.000007862941],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075807843,0.00011159605,0.44421396,0.000014887002,0.00006101662,0.0000058159917,0.1657483,0.000013555648,0.0002580331,0.2115754,0.013840585,0.16414925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008350587,0.00008197465,0.30050376,0.000012829179,0.000030321815,0.0000030612728,0.1255667,0.0008976213,0.000034524477,0.0056670867,0.5659837,0.00038334497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009153209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003171805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5521431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018524173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027621314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17699417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096740045","doi":"","title":"2008. Do child tax benefits affect the wellbeing of children? Evidence from Canadian child benefit expansions, NBER working paper 14624","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Data collection; Research methodology; Developing country; Research design","score_opus":0.018529832156622746,"score_gpt":0.24921392674358683,"score_spread":0.2306840945869641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096740045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9330215,0.01667353,0.00004098821,0.00314331,0.0010901572,0.0005936679,0.000076014054,0.00006991021,0.045290954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929621,0.0034092264,0.00040601523,0.001563298,0.0011171575,0.00001881807,0.0000219624,0.000036190846,0.0004652214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971465,0.00023192618,0.00038503695,0.0004182267,0.0007017989,0.0011164978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980414,0.00047210153,0.00017016668,0.0006283491,0.000100570694,0.0005874471],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010452811,0.00029520996,0.00032432348,0.00013899512,0.0018539205,0.00015410672,0.0008269675,0.00027050418,0.0008747833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026920295,0.0002202116,0.00018693027,0.0006899239,0.0002526818,0.0006216866,0.00011942877,0.0004167804,0.000075949574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005301657,0.000046324327,0.9567633,0.0000031674017,0.000075520256,7.276961e-7,0.015827568,0.00026129148,0.000024167974,0.02189455,0.0011110147,0.003987059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018173554,0.00001532581,0.9833982,0.00037391164,0.000082203245,0.0000028700688,0.010174188,0.00003228473,0.00003590398,0.00039737517,0.004939871,0.00036611705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6438974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8210167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17711931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017790732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022835252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096748761","doi":"","title":"TITLE: cOm:;e Essays on Empirical Household Behayiour","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; British Household Panel Survey; Labour supply; Panel data; Test (biology); Instrumental variable; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Empirical research","score_opus":0.0686785126795095,"score_gpt":0.3235817980830551,"score_spread":0.25490328540354557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096748761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047870558,0.000011670942,0.00097499794,0.0033117924,0.0004398384,0.000047381105,0.000010456525,0.0001154919,0.9472178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.901727,0.00005941802,0.00010927179,0.0010503243,0.0001556908,0.0000016467028,6.518978e-7,0.000006844138,0.09688915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994809,0.000034515073,0.000056341752,0.000099374076,0.00017188366,0.00015700371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997297,0.00006177208,0.000012988117,0.000104423794,0.000019968438,0.00007114147],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013263596,0.000044369386,0.000052291674,0.000021709626,0.00010233613,0.000017609229,0.00011509274,0.00006764585,0.0014407691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036315632,0.000027402735,0.000028032457,0.000075723,0.00007487552,0.00003272506,0.000014297651,0.000038636037,0.0011531344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032712678,0.00007770995,0.07389731,0.0000015291687,0.000008485394,0.0000048244974,0.0011453889,6.287852e-7,0.0000590034,0.28254277,0.63479567,0.0074634394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031506343,0.0000530861,0.051897857,0.000011663888,0.000009066602,4.3895818e-7,0.0015049822,0.00003497849,0.00002822601,0.01014442,0.93577904,0.00022118146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012025188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018575166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85385644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038792812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059717007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096759568","doi":"","title":"The Intertemporal Substitution and Income Effects of a VAT Rate Increase:","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Substitution (logic); Substitution effect; Consumption (sociology); Tax rate; Durable good; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.017542688339081517,"score_gpt":0.2537757160391721,"score_spread":0.23623302770009058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096759568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.974147,0.00019183528,0.0009126471,0.000048740614,0.00027364073,0.00013896893,8.5282835e-7,0.000026246305,0.024260052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880856,0.00022285216,0.00017446933,0.00005348612,0.000025879046,0.00000465332,6.7769724e-7,0.0000026847017,0.0007067614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994269,0.00016117103,0.00010115248,0.00008267064,0.00009521768,0.00013289248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995991,0.00015259249,0.0000447318,0.00009375016,0.000052876265,0.000056964207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054368644,0.000051176437,0.000074532654,0.000022305405,0.00025011745,0.000021928745,0.00011969426,0.00004662399,0.000010760169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013519904,0.000032729225,0.000021570402,0.00011942319,0.00035543827,0.00009919679,0.000036088142,0.000044673183,0.0000044078997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003279221,0.000042503125,0.4690196,0.000035922905,0.00002086809,0.000004323434,0.019532373,1.9925471e-7,0.0003525134,0.5097406,0.000096792566,0.0011215354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003742809,0.000082049046,0.9706027,0.00002226358,0.000022421873,7.3456215e-7,0.007895385,0.00018940691,0.00039859573,0.018933872,0.0013580859,0.00012022866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008787118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055418937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5015831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017643066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005845477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99781346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096990215","doi":"","title":"Labor Economics, Applied Econometrics, Economics of Education, Labor Market Policy Evaluations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Regression discontinuity design; Labor demand; General equilibrium theory; Discontinuity (linguistics); Labour supply; Secondary labor market","score_opus":0.03504033788112174,"score_gpt":0.3036511990504465,"score_spread":0.26861086116932475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096990215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5933772,0.00013953321,0.00012528451,0.0019716956,0.0006042776,0.00034972542,0.00017857578,0.000050803166,0.40320295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96047306,0.007777937,0.0041194744,0.0018257102,0.0007001404,0.0000519402,0.00005756543,0.000029652749,0.02496453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851143,0.00008484084,0.0005505718,0.00035629194,0.000109203844,0.00038765365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847484,0.00021415087,0.00027445177,0.00041063342,0.00039343198,0.00023251017],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007439635,0.00016909733,0.00030588225,0.00060348376,0.00048276596,0.00005205453,0.00044993186,0.00016822484,0.00093993667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003569312,0.00019697426,0.00009301233,0.0009329249,0.00039377157,0.00026471217,0.00005494877,0.000095104755,0.000104082705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010402858,0.0002841692,0.11641369,0.000013111339,0.00006219729,8.83711e-8,0.00921832,0.0004469702,0.000006408578,0.8523277,0.016456513,0.00476044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086433947,0.00004534106,0.65864897,0.000005109227,0.000050149156,0.0000020604587,0.038121134,0.00089938066,0.00006050137,0.052313857,0.24833053,0.0006586503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004321996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003880461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80001384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050791947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005845795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097003401","doi":"","title":"NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES SUBSIDIZING THE STORK: NEW EVIDENCE ON TAX INCENTIVES AND FERTILITY","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Incentive; Fertility; Population; Control (management); Tax incentive; Earned income tax credit; Tax policy","score_opus":0.08301636321954196,"score_gpt":0.29079377570681725,"score_spread":0.20777741248727527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097003401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93266064,0.0031096728,0.00017746311,0.006923171,0.0004044815,0.00021353764,9.3471897e-7,0.00008446994,0.05642565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796912,0.0022655015,0.00031407052,0.0009497871,0.00015918567,0.000003758677,1.9745067e-7,0.0000066580706,0.01660965],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988038,0.00020318294,0.00013020528,0.00024289482,0.00030989357,0.00031005722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992925,0.00032299737,0.00004584715,0.0001960998,0.000040429593,0.00010212475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053620193,0.00010793341,0.00010785132,0.000019700647,0.00087401876,0.00019907427,0.00021825515,0.00007258508,0.00040177556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027146144,0.000073119845,0.000035186727,0.00023991535,0.0003292736,0.0004595745,0.00006115066,0.00014370403,0.000026897576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060062706,0.00007889244,0.71745056,0.000015255468,0.00004137376,0.000005333099,0.1686265,0.000020022599,0.00051373,0.07226232,0.006878238,0.03404772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015877865,0.00003979118,0.88763463,0.00010021572,0.000019514642,5.857013e-7,0.056675673,0.00010763477,0.000033290173,0.004010994,0.050967585,0.00025128314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024219672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014348484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17018409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060060844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045435903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8006791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097060754","doi":"","title":"All views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Setting and Updating Modern Poverty Thresholds","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Percentile; Equivalence (formal languages); Quarter (Canadian coin); Consumption (sociology); Poverty; Value (mathematics); Consumer Expenditure Survey","score_opus":0.05471611392077295,"score_gpt":0.35198680382607683,"score_spread":0.29727068990530386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097060754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797717,0.000384172,0.00009731136,0.004025667,0.00024107429,0.0006134694,0.00031020158,0.000013599671,0.014542831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945807,0.00070558296,0.0019629498,0.0019606764,0.000041868137,0.000011576938,0.0000022096206,0.000015461883,0.00071900827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979754,0.00047402052,0.00053957547,0.00023898043,0.000471247,0.0003007408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981675,0.0005858684,0.00052484474,0.0004806082,0.00018635119,0.00005479991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017584084,0.00017521576,0.00035510355,0.00003965052,0.00034887827,0.00006653558,0.0005822701,0.00016447916,0.00006139293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087205117,0.00007703199,0.000060359223,0.0004009158,0.0006967779,0.00016225068,0.0002611009,0.00035043282,1.6447474e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008740344,0.00015509198,0.43205106,0.00026779526,0.0000763825,8.698735e-7,0.32628173,0.00010042931,0.1039792,0.12589774,0.0045874305,0.006514872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012989616,0.00008652123,0.7905493,0.00038996068,0.00018541032,0.0000028539193,0.13456044,0.005270383,0.0035443478,0.044774354,0.018755622,0.0005818475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011878365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09017349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35849825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017079466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017866273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097076481","doi":"","title":"Why Study the Alberta Welfare Reform................................................................................................... 3 Literature Review....................................................................................................","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Government (linguistics); Poverty; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.028872699505789773,"score_gpt":0.28566306868950586,"score_spread":0.2567903691837161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097076481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065688066,0.05351098,0.012264258,0.038234953,0.025242135,0.055529326,0.0018538518,0.027782468,0.719894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6047724,0.14718744,0.014997366,0.10945089,0.012500915,0.0391828,0.0039296234,0.011604892,0.056373697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.86173946,0.027935933,0.026157053,0.023644594,0.027757114,0.032765865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90989715,0.0060290536,0.013486006,0.036449313,0.01559538,0.018543104],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042086095,0.024279427,0.018788248,0.018157957,0.04104727,0.006896112,0.04772124,0.009431869,0.038750716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012983867,0.022453569,0.015025215,0.052567717,0.026731275,0.022041652,0.011753713,0.025258757,0.011650591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008289727,0.041763768,0.05880354,0.006696441,0.019121734,0.02706359,0.09849023,0.0004247411,0.0006054986,0.3902282,0.3323231,0.016189417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.030671421,0.006893352,0.033737592,0.011197122,0.012985976,0.01166533,0.14642577,0.00069546467,0.0010895991,0.00714174,0.70555884,0.031937797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21606505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08806413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6635203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026564686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013445919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99623907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097288277","doi":"","title":"NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES GENDER, OCCUPATION CHOICE AND THE RISK OF DEATH AT WORK","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Population; Center (category theory); Series (stratigraphy)","score_opus":0.032805383493727046,"score_gpt":0.2778259810246678,"score_spread":0.24502059753094077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097288277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8625353,0.0006127299,0.0005539129,0.0003098286,0.00019219246,0.00015479069,0.00000152127,0.00003462283,0.13560508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861811,0.004318693,0.0006959266,0.00027127092,0.00014080238,0.000006423683,0.0000020181706,0.0000063944262,0.008377379],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990778,0.00020125089,0.00014713545,0.00014172778,0.00023188604,0.0002001802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936545,0.000293863,0.00008926676,0.00014264943,0.000060106784,0.00004864492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006142619,0.00007958463,0.000117438525,0.000021204098,0.00047603724,0.00004890443,0.00011761132,0.00007881049,0.000127546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014334683,0.00005150411,0.00004573392,0.0002748144,0.00028413688,0.00015416136,0.000049984625,0.00007503193,0.0000067049427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003827365,0.000009476989,0.95794415,0.0000018712266,0.00002093875,2.6714198e-7,0.012991617,0.000030349927,0.0000049127852,0.027296761,0.00030490724,0.0013564876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043323636,0.000006475126,0.9508246,0.0000058670084,0.00003942644,6.352518e-7,0.00998545,0.000052272022,0.0000015844773,0.0051951366,0.033365253,0.000090058384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033654785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013615643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12722771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036390968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031703486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7597848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097403398","doi":"","title":"IZA DP No. 4134 Assessing the Impact of a Wage Subsidy for Single Parents on Social Assistance in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Social assistance; Wage; Public assistance; Duration (music)","score_opus":0.04521769380713139,"score_gpt":0.3427760459780971,"score_spread":0.2975583521709657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097403398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95952964,0.000019895257,0.00013403156,0.00032170588,0.00021944153,0.0002109564,0.000031992407,0.000012167074,0.039520144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999195,0.000006452716,0.000117455835,0.00026921075,0.000116619914,0.000004098816,0.000005681484,0.000006064103,0.00027940897],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988608,0.0001022156,0.0001974618,0.00015046433,0.00032075992,0.00036831514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945164,0.00016288066,0.000104732906,0.00010327719,0.00012322061,0.000054241074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035937518,0.000099466735,0.00017069858,0.00002826429,0.00034125187,0.00007993026,0.00022736915,0.000059803777,0.000018541337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014447278,0.00006988547,0.000081167775,0.00027359338,0.000060871418,0.00011199288,0.000007888983,0.000088213295,9.668394e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009595547,0.0007153151,0.93387353,0.000021134425,0.00006414198,0.000011129013,0.022091473,0.00077212026,0.0035776107,0.015796699,0.011804695,0.0111762015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037650805,0.0000751514,0.9773462,0.000017130986,0.00000731173,8.236704e-8,0.019628292,0.0010351925,0.000033894587,0.0009676395,0.0003654095,0.00014721384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8428985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9523354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10943692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092104473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016240737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2881037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097508868","doi":"","title":"Poverty, Job Quality and Labor Market Dynamics Women’s Economic Resources and Bargaining in Marriage: Does Egyptian Women’s Status Depend on Earnings or Marriage","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Population; Quality (philosophy); Collective bargaining; Public health; Human resources; Public policy; Reproductive health; Health care","score_opus":0.016576328453968076,"score_gpt":0.2856819535069138,"score_spread":0.2691056250529457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097508868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9518465,0.00011838827,0.000012678132,0.00047962813,0.0004144305,0.00032368046,0.00019189162,0.00009594246,0.04651689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880678,0.0010653673,0.0003946357,0.001351761,0.00020927597,0.00007199287,0.000009721111,0.00004079557,0.008788634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621683,0.0007700089,0.0005279155,0.000566392,0.00035744734,0.0015614139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997941,0.0007460234,0.00020905984,0.0002927415,0.000040663046,0.0007705144],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041156034,0.00033683347,0.0004974189,0.000239041,0.0005343413,0.00034337287,0.0002580847,0.00028253545,0.002173663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005420182,0.00026282985,0.000037016234,0.00022709617,0.00027938996,0.0006424291,0.00020959308,0.00037373885,0.000016372403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025533233,0.000053762356,0.89243263,0.000037054484,0.000033147975,0.0000056765775,0.09090877,0.0000080043565,0.00000981921,0.014327246,0.00020533732,0.0017232344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086663204,0.00009260382,0.75830966,0.000016958069,0.00000678957,0.0000012149734,0.22930704,0.00049349625,8.4812814e-7,0.001573756,0.008944977,0.00038600463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008218554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063000344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13839826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017140651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022844854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097542586","doi":"","title":"2005a), “Low-fee ($5/day/child) Regulated Childcare Policy and the Labor Supply of Mothers with Young Children: A Natural Experiment from Canada,” Working Paper, Université du Québec à Montréal","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Christian ministry; Social research; Government (linguistics); Natural experiment; Data collection; Data source; Social policy","score_opus":0.002037476390385167,"score_gpt":0.17018708428907764,"score_spread":0.16814960789869246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097542586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96920043,0.0056928676,0.000007298332,0.015023759,0.00009978412,0.00038232567,0.00007710027,0.000053611533,0.009462819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996485,0.0006334313,0.0002051398,0.0013265819,0.00037254032,0.0000042672877,0.000022578464,0.00002211427,0.0009283257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843997,0.00016996694,0.00021753115,0.00030512636,0.00044784672,0.00041956018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992412,0.00010986689,0.0001288789,0.00026081997,0.000103532664,0.00015574449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016823992,0.00022289116,0.00027471772,0.000060372484,0.0007215668,0.00006311833,0.00035340068,0.00009392926,0.00011075588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037634418,0.00015130208,0.000059384598,0.00038862444,0.0004959106,0.00015693654,0.0000690977,0.00018007863,9.0134046e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048599456,0.00013162197,0.68033093,0.000005268876,0.0006534822,0.000012453077,0.27626806,0.0012562658,0.0001916767,0.03219461,0.0038311693,0.004638465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028327953,0.000026364083,0.9000455,0.00005436694,0.00006536737,0.000006364964,0.08858051,0.0005797338,0.0000665475,0.000032661126,0.0073694806,0.000340271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99645805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21971463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005468205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014938485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.616992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097584788","doi":"","title":"Improving the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey’s Sampling Procedure October 2009","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sample (material); Sampling frame; Sampling (signal processing); Quarter (Canadian coin); Panel data; Turnover; Current Population Survey","score_opus":0.05034071618857628,"score_gpt":0.3033355696349264,"score_spread":0.25299485344635014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097584788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9776638,0.00046140235,0.00063216675,0.0009815095,0.00037291495,0.00027336704,0.000022476213,0.00007263167,0.019519718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98814946,0.000047983212,0.0010599552,0.0012087282,0.00021188788,0.0000069765088,0.000004918971,0.000014324082,0.009295786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874794,0.00014986155,0.00015238838,0.00024422805,0.00034590872,0.0003596798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991175,0.00016731575,0.0000654719,0.00015808603,0.0003082084,0.00018344123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020794421,0.0001174413,0.00012831045,0.00002786335,0.00045936406,0.00030789815,0.0002800862,0.00011109914,0.00004635824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088900526,0.00007752966,0.000023271119,0.0003342203,0.00018040689,0.00028988856,0.00010302145,0.00016190435,0.000017699098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011557033,0.00001178755,0.9564532,0.000008178045,0.000013186958,9.440845e-7,0.025418375,0.000014856624,0.00011911151,0.010749766,0.0063708355,0.0008282019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004049543,0.000031154446,0.93922824,0.000009269853,0.000018343388,0.0000022038294,0.041263632,0.0006009469,0.00001063448,0.0015497581,0.016609391,0.00027144785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027231852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047735322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020503473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005272763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042893947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9792459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097709057","doi":"","title":"Dalhousie University.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Survey data collection; Poverty; Measuring poverty; Survey methodology","score_opus":0.018323877383896715,"score_gpt":0.2436317368901727,"score_spread":0.225307859506276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097709057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18666667,0.000013208808,0.0018021403,0.00016375758,0.0001927626,0.0000357161,8.858817e-7,0.00006271733,0.81106216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87129474,0.00010680931,0.0012518172,0.00023071184,0.000026881267,7.5261966e-8,5.5281845e-7,0.0000028111695,0.1270856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954796,0.00007283548,0.00003068974,0.000082033985,0.00010986789,0.00015664208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978954,0.000023771332,0.000010195746,0.00007158521,0.00003507447,0.00006985573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001623372,0.000032190448,0.00003859367,0.000024939796,0.00026994693,0.000016375934,0.000098324395,0.000044577922,0.0005000867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003558401,0.000033346838,0.000022538994,0.00020278724,0.000076668024,0.00007163885,0.000007482417,0.00003424007,0.0001082599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.016667e-7,0.00001462391,0.03282352,6.043941e-7,0.0000034418438,0.000004465512,0.00528791,0.0000055346436,0.000013398679,0.95971286,0.001930215,0.00020289537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012066169,0.000006595674,0.012313849,6.724266e-7,0.0000047905523,2.3247732e-7,0.060962047,0.000014626878,0.000005072511,0.0027646131,0.9237237,0.000083114384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009625319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032799877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9569483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033514632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012999549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54755986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097739913","doi":"","title":"PRELIMINARY contact","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Welfare; Almost ideal demand system; Position (finance); Tax credit; Sales tax","score_opus":0.018567996347984245,"score_gpt":0.27604523611594506,"score_spread":0.25747723976796083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097739913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44470945,0.000044838496,0.000066055916,0.0003712673,0.000097455,0.000055948985,0.0000013831466,0.00006953485,0.554584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90810007,0.00024012495,0.0003047865,0.0006950103,0.000115629315,0.000002843286,0.0000021409971,0.000004107986,0.09053532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994313,0.00004605876,0.000071018,0.00010259527,0.00015094064,0.00019809279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975747,0.00003636939,0.000009451134,0.00009381111,0.000023726703,0.00007916159],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014964642,0.000045933935,0.0000573773,0.000014367339,0.0002264761,0.000032084652,0.00012825296,0.000057372938,0.0058786934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013199778,0.000041324325,0.000031509924,0.00010691687,0.000053249558,0.00009618989,0.0000064179635,0.000045975612,0.00051709724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008895282,0.000337999,0.18080206,0.00001258759,0.000048486203,0.000038223952,0.0937779,0.00008342162,0.0001568198,0.5303385,0.05539571,0.13891931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032206,0.0001360394,0.39110333,0.000005820234,0.000013089644,0.0000012105921,0.02293248,0.00036948433,0.000008931023,0.005182814,0.57968307,0.00024168662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022281045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082023354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5251557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026701475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007188441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99503005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097985544","doi":"","title":"Labour Market Outcomes: A Cross-National Study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duration (music); Welfare; Welfare system; Social assistance; Social Welfare; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.033851689594805105,"score_gpt":0.3699177544703988,"score_spread":0.3360660648755937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097985544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6114418,0.0000058929727,0.0006969401,0.00016339646,0.00034350448,0.00016337312,0.0000073646706,0.00007242971,0.38710532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89140123,0.0000054810575,0.00057732285,0.00093893794,0.00014377476,0.000004128861,0.0000015537018,0.000006538748,0.106921025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984783,0.00007201576,0.00019826894,0.00018627604,0.0007293462,0.0003358282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992463,0.00019755847,0.000040653595,0.00010980324,0.00028724837,0.000118412216],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026713707,0.00008494798,0.00010596285,0.00007071148,0.00042734956,0.000121202356,0.00023493238,0.00007266225,0.0011226801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031050624,0.00007283553,0.000049167025,0.0003183627,0.00010931444,0.00015192371,0.00003669174,0.000082923514,0.00009291729],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051115517,0.00018989814,0.9153259,0.0000010965957,0.000019196932,0.000004615951,0.0072550625,0.0000033408185,0.000001148814,0.07591628,0.0011426774,0.00013566088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003393818,0.00002034244,0.9398241,5.1127375e-7,0.0000034735426,1.6730905e-7,0.04181562,0.000019701052,2.467731e-7,0.002984347,0.014893895,0.00009820826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002321706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018711032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28018427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001151332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018445277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098003674","doi":"","title":"NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES GENDER DIFFERENCES IN COMPETITION: EVIDENCE FROM A MATRILINEAL AND A PATRIARCHAL SOCIETY","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Developing country; Developed country; Data collection; Research methodology","score_opus":0.08031348826299024,"score_gpt":0.2829199729695881,"score_spread":0.20260648470659787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098003674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924712,0.0013975274,0.0007500249,0.00097486156,0.00022802204,0.00015927246,0.000008599754,0.00006854877,0.003941938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843224,0.009433958,0.004753431,0.00037450664,0.00034294045,0.000011326716,0.0000050617327,0.000007447797,0.0007489043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858993,0.00017469248,0.00022266727,0.00031017148,0.0003742289,0.00032833096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933666,0.00033232922,0.000048824255,0.00012003699,0.000055943015,0.000106222644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033388508,0.00013272313,0.0002116618,0.000030228608,0.0005132633,0.000074707576,0.00016452074,0.00014067811,0.00030564336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005767443,0.00011496854,0.00007184922,0.0002686554,0.0005358576,0.00040760156,0.000078584526,0.00016989383,0.000008578853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001825474,0.000025810756,0.91586196,0.0000067354795,0.000015069504,0.00001084189,0.07593425,0.000003134807,0.00007076737,0.0076388456,0.00014489923,0.0002694399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033825974,0.00001960523,0.93687975,0.000045999208,0.00001043852,0.000003737324,0.05572968,0.0003352624,0.00000227515,0.0050762272,0.0013515954,0.00020716606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066805333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016497904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021017803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055850993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017414341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098007192","doi":"","title":"CIRPÉE Centre interuniversitaire sur le risque, les politiques économiques et l’emploi Cahier de recherche/Working Paper 02-05 Using a Canadian-American Natural Experiment to Study Relative Efficiencies of Social Welfare Payment Systems1","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Welfare","score_opus":0.12756984737833507,"score_gpt":0.340762438064791,"score_spread":0.21319259068645594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098007192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716078,0.00017282227,0.0002149662,0.0057994477,0.00015022505,0.000583321,0.000021313517,0.00008272271,0.021367354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996226,0.00003836709,0.0019434988,0.00040188798,0.000059334114,0.000009564379,0.0000031934649,0.00002203518,0.001296103],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970339,0.0014177748,0.00031290422,0.00035546877,0.00025658458,0.0006233513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998988,0.0001687668,0.00016333575,0.00015334525,0.00025527482,0.00027128725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009185517,0.00022064598,0.00035659765,0.00019961984,0.0010288858,0.00010175577,0.00031944053,0.00017230448,0.00013409281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014826667,0.00022119131,0.00011638923,0.0004523202,0.0002875503,0.00029135737,0.000093867566,0.00030230626,0.000001775982],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001532639,0.0002998195,0.060194246,0.000013058359,0.00017124909,0.00001971863,0.8325662,0.0001298616,0.0002801296,0.10418744,0.0003464345,0.0017764932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027051082,0.00011321845,0.029424662,0.000042933432,0.000035257515,9.886251e-7,0.96625847,0.00058459677,0.000109885426,0.00010783001,0.0027408425,0.00031079963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81267625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71029085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13369225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040392103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057306676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098033012","doi":"","title":"THE INFLUENCE OF INSTRUCTOR GENDER ON COLLEGE ACHIEVEMENT","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Karel; Paid work; Social research; Research council; Data collection","score_opus":0.021002197550981237,"score_gpt":0.2868037244925228,"score_spread":0.2658015269415415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098033012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88111854,0.000017109634,0.0001331983,0.00022049231,0.00022533641,0.00014487897,0.0000068383956,0.000022180295,0.11811145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966218,0.000088224166,0.00035155303,0.00050255546,0.000058970643,0.0000019632878,4.903005e-7,0.000004195728,0.0023702672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898005,0.000047592606,0.00018621044,0.000108452274,0.00040680534,0.00027091746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994081,0.00018408659,0.000060043963,0.00016467429,0.00010852519,0.00007457345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000926482,0.00006310826,0.00007001026,0.000031415657,0.00044058586,0.000016377373,0.0002620035,0.000057861707,0.000022875123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085292784,0.00004184498,0.00003436274,0.0002489515,0.00024905178,0.000054248965,0.00002886811,0.00007099826,0.000014357674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018054907,0.000045340825,0.069609076,0.0000033621834,0.000015321606,0.0000012431938,0.008221015,0.00010057962,0.00029510944,0.9204918,0.00035021233,0.0008488748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019059246,0.000047843005,0.9205356,0.0000033172532,0.000004641205,1.3393101e-7,0.050749745,0.000013742273,0.00011367423,0.0049010334,0.023350332,0.00008935162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067642407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003949172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91559076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006846867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012138593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33886746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099198264","doi":"","title":"and","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Child care; Work (physics); Paid work; Quality (philosophy); Social policy; Parental leave; Child support","score_opus":0.02391935068860523,"score_gpt":0.2866439473845777,"score_spread":0.2627245966959725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099198264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53391653,0.00004309052,0.00041468238,0.00057786267,0.00006908013,0.000019114583,1.8452153e-7,0.000027299064,0.46493214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729431,0.0005760214,0.00038681,0.0004463875,0.00006703023,5.73507e-7,2.675295e-7,0.0000014489663,0.025578322],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997615,0.000013778395,0.000026880505,0.000050915853,0.000052681815,0.0000942497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998871,0.0000142909075,0.00000477653,0.00003316281,0.00001478232,0.00004585179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000098190656,0.000019160121,0.000024589064,0.000009987983,0.00013388107,0.000022911398,0.000035875713,0.00002418187,0.00016486493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015030921,0.00001666263,0.0000064730166,0.00007113107,0.000058152495,0.000044082444,0.000007733805,0.00001738938,0.000024290546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010237952,0.000013037914,0.59090704,8.333185e-7,0.0000028947875,0.0000024077574,0.010435856,9.093479e-7,0.000027773072,0.38913307,0.002139899,0.007335253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013882734,0.000012423917,0.3971815,0.0000012034709,0.0000037107147,0.0000012926358,0.037714534,0.00015786824,0.0000012037365,0.016489115,0.54819727,0.00010103123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012918405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00303203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54605734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000069302205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019031757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1952885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099220070","doi":"","title":"Working Paper Series Distributional Impacts of the Self-Sufficiency Project","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Quantile; Welfare; Distribution (mathematics); Series (stratigraphy); Observational study; Counterfactual thinking; Impact evaluation","score_opus":0.01829724881845869,"score_gpt":0.276209240115885,"score_spread":0.2579119912974263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099220070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7787874,0.0001330724,0.00014666695,0.0028201512,0.0004244467,0.00025107898,0.000016088672,0.00009558482,0.21732554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99646366,0.00010656835,0.0008783745,0.00021920534,0.00019266568,0.0000037323828,0.000003009964,0.0000038470253,0.0021289669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990287,0.000078743346,0.00014707059,0.00011513434,0.0003633177,0.00026704324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963534,0.000045505803,0.00006206324,0.00013093553,0.000085091684,0.000041054715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036282104,0.000069962916,0.0000790904,0.000018708493,0.00044768438,0.00004086995,0.00025285713,0.00006341663,0.00010547135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009469742,0.000044938708,0.00006675033,0.00043002996,0.00019919501,0.00019892745,0.000048059705,0.000076874414,0.00000677275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056055296,0.0001687919,0.29900444,0.000006175053,0.000018141534,2.9855127e-7,0.021303544,0.00002432485,0.00034826837,0.6756987,0.0026225278,0.00079917436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023076354,0.00003906274,0.57700896,0.000021666574,0.000024545236,0.0000023735902,0.03255995,0.00017213337,0.000104505314,0.001986615,0.38761863,0.00023076417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006242179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064821546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6737121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010096843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000545933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36171943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099389754","doi":"","title":"The distribution of Cr between basaltic • melt and chromian spinel as an oxygen geobarometer, Canadian Mineralogist 39","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spinel; Sack; Liquidus; Oxygen; Basalt; Equation of state; Distribution (mathematics)","score_opus":0.019975634893885336,"score_gpt":0.27593933163625656,"score_spread":0.25596369674237124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099389754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9697372,0.000109357046,0.000034972545,0.0015779606,0.000089707166,0.00017887108,0.00015094527,0.000027016926,0.028094003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99551773,0.0003863015,0.00008847714,0.00020310582,0.00015636797,0.000004200917,0.00012236022,0.0000074190025,0.0035140133],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882084,0.00013159901,0.00020337815,0.00019953391,0.00022007029,0.00042458734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922746,0.00006485913,0.000041194544,0.00021036914,0.00007668323,0.00037943406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051548396,0.000106776664,0.00014891214,0.00003717719,0.0007332929,0.00010873484,0.00027065884,0.00011765346,0.00021298994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007696257,0.00008103846,0.00003844653,0.00026269176,0.0004309668,0.00014955692,0.00001339165,0.00008218096,0.000019207988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036276586,0.0001616428,0.71507037,0.000047411228,0.00021340491,0.000020192007,0.02331411,0.00006395721,0.00040620612,0.13668332,0.008603607,0.11537949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020227162,0.00008479789,0.9547162,0.00000480228,0.000026602485,7.210129e-7,0.0046095303,0.00022405891,0.000009467049,0.0030138714,0.036950987,0.00015665827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7609757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7852437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23964584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013454173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003751206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56399703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099770797","doi":"","title":"2004), “Neutrality Theorem Revisited: An Empirical Examination of Household Public Goods Provision”, presented at the Canadian Economics Association Conference","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unitary state; Public good; Neutrality; Empirical examination; Relevance (law); Wife; Distribution (mathematics); Association (psychology)","score_opus":0.06876943847435284,"score_gpt":0.3107483649943589,"score_spread":0.24197892652000608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099770797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9189135,0.000036441208,0.00012280475,0.011512236,0.00012287383,0.0004496196,0.000113888265,0.00006235577,0.06866628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928909,0.00014674148,0.00014700297,0.000746651,0.00016555683,0.000010080951,0.00008604019,0.000011595163,0.0057954155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977989,0.0007569428,0.00035023852,0.00028875,0.0003563474,0.0004488178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985815,0.00020083925,0.00024681425,0.0003384654,0.0003402153,0.00029215726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029400242,0.00012550525,0.00017934122,0.00010051797,0.00075426674,0.0002442903,0.00042227318,0.0002642313,0.00022690695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003809511,0.00009953873,0.00006582403,0.0003283351,0.00020888592,0.00057998893,0.00004408316,0.0001684858,0.000013792035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070216147,0.00014332007,0.73329216,0.000010156398,0.00004542207,3.9602563e-7,0.019094178,0.00029405576,0.000027486923,0.23291744,0.0051008617,0.009067507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029242891,0.000047145473,0.91491795,0.0000059013732,0.000028684422,4.732882e-7,0.007815282,0.007461708,0.000046667094,0.001803479,0.06734059,0.0002396711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09107165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9233389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8322673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017290965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010044139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.914981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099847469","doi":"","title":"of LaborDo Higher Childcare Subsidies Improve Parental Well-being? Evidence from Québec’s Family Policies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Work (physics); Research center; Citation; Center (category theory); Politics","score_opus":0.020574544682772714,"score_gpt":0.2837619989350757,"score_spread":0.263187454252303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099847469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93786216,0.00464908,0.000057934463,0.0012827876,0.0013908502,0.00018629397,0.000056962243,0.000118070864,0.054395836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99187994,0.0014414842,0.00041933556,0.00070622785,0.0006953456,0.000010531417,0.00001021067,0.000019923957,0.004816989],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817663,0.00013978066,0.0003084986,0.00024673616,0.00051577215,0.0006126008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888647,0.00027406565,0.00013471834,0.00030225335,0.0001839501,0.00021852036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031282287,0.00020081183,0.00028449742,0.000065302294,0.000332914,0.00005944235,0.0004340587,0.00016028796,0.00041300655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100720084,0.000173425,0.00011600183,0.00031035274,0.00042970153,0.00057754474,0.00009264705,0.00013485573,0.00007839239],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009158955,0.00006844147,0.8949531,0.00001141836,0.000040116705,4.1852013e-7,0.07066085,0.0000018096094,0.0024845453,0.030050514,0.001437862,0.00028181233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015083703,0.00003406965,0.9113342,0.000033664837,0.000043195214,9.860254e-8,0.07338657,0.000007690221,0.0005419426,0.0009596106,0.0132556055,0.00025250012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45912993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11952073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3396092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013745151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032682068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8965457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100166307","doi":"","title":"Household Responses to Individual Shocks: Disability and Labor Supply","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Odds; British Household Panel Survey; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Exploit; Labour supply; Disability insurance; Selection (genetic algorithm); Longitudinal data","score_opus":0.049863285771793726,"score_gpt":0.29498373639042025,"score_spread":0.24512045061862653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100166307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99085766,0.00007304132,0.00003376416,0.0024129401,0.00017090682,0.00022716161,0.00016245575,0.00014233564,0.0059197242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928414,0.00020094718,0.0012493083,0.0014060998,0.00013656772,0.000011714575,0.0000046636815,0.000009737419,0.0041395407],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986871,0.00018045685,0.00015180511,0.00027438893,0.0003695355,0.00033671118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923307,0.00023611513,0.0000210338,0.00020041251,0.00005389388,0.00025545098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005393626,0.00010385846,0.00013730573,0.0000391704,0.0005820758,0.00006366839,0.00021685586,0.00009703447,0.000121135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031209568,0.00009301864,0.000031452266,0.00034230223,0.0005681507,0.00015484827,0.00008646596,0.000087762804,0.000017215469],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020971489,0.00005588611,0.9760275,0.0000023986597,0.0000063745133,0.0000038718063,0.016176648,0.0000030545873,0.000019575838,0.004969388,0.0025418205,0.00017254266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014906618,0.000046477915,0.97869116,0.0000022029697,0.000006621182,0.0000017400027,0.012293103,0.0000036425606,0.000010668048,0.00047612443,0.008180628,0.00013858051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031441841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005995947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056388075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056163408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017092978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4753087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100168186","doi":"","title":"NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES BOY-GIRL DIFFERENCES IN PARENTAL TIME INVESTMENTS: EVIDENCE FROM THREE COUNTRIES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Series (stratigraphy); Time series; Developing country; Variation (astronomy)","score_opus":0.03546524554969214,"score_gpt":0.2575214651913125,"score_spread":0.2220562196416204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100168186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819418,0.0010744481,0.000053252734,0.0017521932,0.00043610003,0.000354598,0.000009948658,0.0001054612,0.014272203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921772,0.0011739088,0.0010525743,0.0010334407,0.00018008555,0.00006071775,0.000010818459,0.0000123293,0.004298955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819106,0.00015795806,0.00029960094,0.00035341314,0.0005101305,0.00048782275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918866,0.00029183872,0.000082975785,0.00021429133,0.000082771614,0.0001394314],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002740186,0.00019486825,0.0002591231,0.000057719124,0.0003612099,0.0004051974,0.00042363373,0.00015249847,0.0031859684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001431134,0.00015856265,0.000050313858,0.00028012646,0.00040002645,0.0014654632,0.00010959927,0.00014383873,0.00065302115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069158446,0.000030215695,0.9814423,0.0000031123134,0.000018011317,0.000002358092,0.01252096,0.0000023969103,0.000105305386,0.0041501475,0.0014324844,0.00028579828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016182275,0.000022088727,0.95520836,0.00011105041,0.000010949706,1.9874739e-7,0.023179758,0.00017143982,0.000007445725,0.019095467,0.0017815152,0.00024988074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037861828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.094660774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05679895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013013941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016409252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99772525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100237710","doi":"","title":"Employment Insurance and family response to unemployment: Canadian evidence from","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Government (linguistics); General partnership; Bridge (graph theory); Work (physics); Social insurance; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.035429138692950765,"score_gpt":0.2934588846429413,"score_spread":0.2580297459499905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100237710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98590535,0.00052617746,0.00045697636,0.008191438,0.00032938016,0.0003228181,0.000059894555,0.00007380924,0.004134145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914674,0.000433668,0.0019627966,0.004323296,0.00007815979,0.000018582534,0.0000021412159,0.000012250742,0.0017016892],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984831,0.00015411874,0.0001730782,0.00034922684,0.00035772502,0.0004827018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875927,0.00017958056,0.000026765865,0.00023523407,0.00008853538,0.00071060105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006222921,0.00013010706,0.00013766123,0.00011581256,0.00048053445,0.00012180444,0.0002728826,0.000094093375,0.000039531908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028526894,0.00012937059,0.00002864584,0.00038556973,0.00012900186,0.00020997899,0.000042429754,0.00008544288,0.00009026284],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023539524,0.00006777783,0.85489345,0.000005047093,0.000041326493,0.000069529204,0.11774488,0.00078379764,0.004807374,0.015697021,0.0016440789,0.004010326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028114914,0.00007520897,0.96544373,0.000060721602,0.0000062352124,2.9602646e-7,0.009878469,0.000007323179,0.000039928516,0.0021777921,0.021803465,0.00022568977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90321386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91895926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11055028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005327858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010670988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52755797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100450045","doi":"","title":"Joint Taxation and the Labour Supply of Married Women: Evidence from the Canadian Tax Reform of 1988, Fiscal Studies 28","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Joint (building); Labour supply; Tax reform; Double taxation; Fiscal policy; Work (physics); Tax credit","score_opus":0.03728557618485109,"score_gpt":0.2896692206874294,"score_spread":0.25238364450257833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100450045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848568,0.0008350377,0.000066607376,0.00809447,0.00017974479,0.00023658916,0.000056601657,0.000007753224,0.005666439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99650544,0.0010839899,0.0002323813,0.00061834085,0.00008675071,0.00000738135,0.000001820653,0.0000037297332,0.0014601691],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988783,0.0001396227,0.00025678345,0.00012050732,0.00033640064,0.0002683574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988031,0.00051221397,0.00020676096,0.00017374994,0.00020547972,0.00009871974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002773648,0.00007516039,0.00017915301,0.00003605968,0.00045826205,0.000030141631,0.0002139998,0.00006663545,0.00006480099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008179011,0.000038624483,0.00003312018,0.00024548854,0.0008673777,0.0001094811,0.000044245182,0.00008847666,0.0000015067425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010019711,0.000021211697,0.3133,0.000029332878,0.00014784622,0.0000021129492,0.47398013,0.000011023266,0.0002761198,0.2082599,0.0017650615,0.002107072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022004433,0.000022930932,0.66060567,0.00002267762,0.000011754242,1.3499688e-7,0.3307557,0.000035867346,0.00005744707,0.007158974,0.0010537548,0.000055050572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85089797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9786016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34730563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030870456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028121955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35246277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100490319","doi":"","title":"acknowledged. Preliminary versions of this paper have been presented in conferences in","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disclaimer; Work (physics); Individualism; Ain't","score_opus":0.054812315731364004,"score_gpt":0.29634398370825915,"score_spread":0.24153166797689515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100490319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52908057,0.00008086645,0.000022136932,0.00013792263,0.00013936275,0.00016181427,0.000005050657,0.000016836317,0.47035542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919893,0.0002854539,0.0003546068,0.00005275611,0.000020241803,0.0000087123735,0.0000039404517,0.000004313968,0.0072806636],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904,0.00015995657,0.0002105516,0.00016378253,0.00018344918,0.00024227602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953324,0.00011424953,0.0000454802,0.00013178618,0.000109606655,0.000065623804],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034637496,0.000075918826,0.00015005267,0.0001253797,0.0000710781,0.000008452679,0.00027841746,0.00012789929,0.0017275133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015118955,0.000067647576,0.000036747737,0.00027141324,0.0002441433,0.00018421926,0.00007060062,0.000114759925,0.000037672395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032598477,0.00025700216,0.86401975,0.000010118765,0.000008310587,0.000004629376,0.10489806,0.0000024808971,0.000066816625,0.028550701,0.0016891266,0.0004603968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003698791,0.00009034699,0.87022966,0.000033163127,0.000007800419,9.496702e-8,0.12301857,0.0002703375,0.000063635365,0.0032644419,0.0025322435,0.00011984203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03231885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.103061765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46307477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038320806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025630338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100510759","doi":"","title":"“Do Higher Childcare Subsidies Improve Parental Well-being? Evidence from Québec’s Family","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Government (linguistics); Production (economics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.017732839275261304,"score_gpt":0.26224260387685305,"score_spread":0.24450976460159174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100510759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8879533,0.0021614062,0.000100323625,0.0021671636,0.0015108153,0.00037839427,0.000015253801,0.00023134991,0.10548201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814096,0.0012672548,0.0005367794,0.0013625649,0.0005962841,0.000043746986,0.0000113057085,0.000023785635,0.014748677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979746,0.00013696188,0.0002806577,0.000488569,0.00055052113,0.0005687152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988308,0.00025969849,0.000089865534,0.000366465,0.00020575443,0.00024742298],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020246815,0.00023213465,0.00024444683,0.000050203067,0.0005640591,0.0003274409,0.00056383054,0.00018781758,0.0026850696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081803424,0.00019780865,0.0001262324,0.00022160551,0.00031667872,0.00068779284,0.00009753386,0.00019195181,0.0013792696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075374933,0.000067970795,0.9199891,0.000010150795,0.000061692954,0.000004261285,0.047528956,0.00000471849,0.0021340006,0.010563754,0.017018557,0.0026093135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021408487,0.00004687195,0.91181433,0.000046212746,0.000032475793,1.4417017e-7,0.067442276,0.000090122914,0.00007410098,0.008514903,0.011304699,0.00041979525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5736651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12954363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44412148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018617295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035734416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100512772","doi":"","title":"Key Findings from 25 Years of IWPR Research Health, Safety, Violence, and Disaster: How Economic Analysis Improves Outcomes for Women and Families","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Socioeconomic status; Health policy; Social security; Occupational safety and health; Quarter (Canadian coin); Abortion; Social policy; Health equity; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.0249553764334501,"score_gpt":0.31817314616018477,"score_spread":0.2932177697267347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100512772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957898,0.00024280179,0.00016222679,0.0021658272,0.000079503494,0.00044659543,0.00013917848,0.000018194334,0.0009558567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904782,0.005700682,0.0011166357,0.00012276386,0.00003351804,0.000048031827,0.00001062058,0.000008761903,0.0024807947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862015,0.00012700277,0.0002394189,0.0003212792,0.00021185905,0.00048030558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881285,0.00064369885,0.00007659999,0.00017756697,0.00008917517,0.00020009126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010348948,0.00010052401,0.00038552625,0.00026243587,0.00032607935,0.00018311595,0.00020590621,0.00009212321,0.00006403672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010672029,0.00009063671,0.000064870124,0.0002566672,0.00050664844,0.00027509956,0.0001076894,0.000082504135,0.0000046354667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012677505,0.000024178216,0.8848206,0.000033856657,0.0002402683,9.232609e-8,0.06620375,0.00000376628,0.000098197626,0.004768139,0.00027150824,0.043522973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029881814,0.00007948068,0.8228469,0.000010152563,0.0000168704,2.6419686e-8,0.15967633,0.0010196746,0.0000023974928,0.015332621,0.00060809223,0.00010864673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049293485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026016884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09347258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013159863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014714486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100527064","doi":"","title":"Collective female labor supply: theory and application”, Economic Journal","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Work (physics); Hospitality; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.00965330636838462,"score_gpt":0.279614307276895,"score_spread":0.2699610009085104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100527064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8013664,0.00017994156,0.014440403,0.00047341624,0.00020349902,0.00017615157,0.00000767201,0.000037704744,0.18311483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834352,0.00024225048,0.0010672419,0.00059681264,0.00029364834,0.0000029007144,0.0000012901104,0.0000055843843,0.014355051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993198,0.000089730136,0.00013300634,0.00012873102,0.00009541674,0.0002333145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943703,0.00021990083,0.00005504103,0.000073692914,0.000072061535,0.00014227052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019008477,0.00006214943,0.000085767606,0.00005963435,0.00061272696,0.0000926626,0.00012284584,0.000072164024,0.00015531191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004869249,0.000056962184,0.000025054467,0.00012314158,0.00016181642,0.00012251407,0.000014180541,0.00009337079,0.00003246876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002824656,0.000027813294,0.20477706,0.0000013065437,0.000018159984,0.0000017526659,0.02794398,0.000011067149,0.00007638486,0.7600778,0.00084721047,0.006189218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039716397,0.000046433168,0.70391774,0.0000024332664,0.000015537174,0.0000069213934,0.10231965,0.000084616,0.000048781974,0.16441995,0.028557977,0.00018276655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002506209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003484616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5956578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026576172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004830883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47126624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100637673","doi":"","title":"Before the House Committee on Education and Labor","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Earnings; Miller; Working class; Work (physics); Middle class; Falling (accident); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.014765281160753006,"score_gpt":0.29486307758739216,"score_spread":0.2800977964266392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100637673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88771814,0.00006225954,0.00008115199,0.004729384,0.00037551782,0.000109427514,0.0000014972485,0.00006250253,0.10686011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98879355,0.000048311853,0.00023309904,0.0033555464,0.0002425305,0.0000022374888,0.0000010669788,0.0000061298906,0.007317504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995225,0.000035764842,0.0000644832,0.00008199007,0.0001445877,0.00015064447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970776,0.000056175046,0.000014390383,0.00011019502,0.000053980384,0.00005748195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005035025,0.000044174845,0.000038966147,0.000023417759,0.00038464757,0.000046327314,0.000108310094,0.0000482882,0.00003258676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004769842,0.000028491066,0.000012665746,0.0001536472,0.00012414076,0.00005045459,0.00001227171,0.00006608566,0.000023889288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027615754,0.00007571883,0.39491615,0.0000020600894,0.0000043850355,2.3691135e-7,0.05576294,8.4305185e-7,0.0000074915806,0.5222455,0.005972027,0.02100988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006400655,0.000027433092,0.826859,0.0000028081588,0.000004689502,2.6648812e-7,0.087935895,0.000010753689,0.000005866304,0.007427395,0.077611715,0.000050156134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019284544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028832182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51481813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030714666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008573805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100848890","doi":"","title":"NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE, OCCUPATIONAL TASKS AND DECLINING IMMIGRANT OUTCOMES: IMPLICATIONS FOR EARNINGS AND INCOME INEQUALITY IN CANADA","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Immigration; Inequality; Economic inequality; Series (stratigraphy); Developed country","score_opus":0.11297674239604034,"score_gpt":0.34472157800142783,"score_spread":0.2317448356053875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100848890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930228,0.00011220385,0.00062525255,0.005224512,0.000076533695,0.00029232798,0.000025264048,0.000039702565,0.0005813921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995918,0.00007383666,0.0030040995,0.00075828016,0.00003205883,0.000106358406,0.000012561734,0.000005176836,0.00008966607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991142,0.000063336745,0.0002188045,0.0002075398,0.00015122344,0.0002449056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993358,0.000302774,0.00006772536,0.00008725694,0.00009294883,0.000113446826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007832219,0.00009102214,0.00016964677,0.000052540985,0.00025904176,0.000044632827,0.00010011623,0.000102396116,0.0000055177115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005932575,0.00007479188,0.00001523165,0.00022397451,0.00017000598,0.0001827144,0.00006653435,0.00010446521,2.715748e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007694989,0.000007624658,0.9645721,0.0000035282014,0.0000048364495,3.575596e-7,0.00369973,0.000002387383,0.0000045053225,0.029888008,0.000027544436,0.0017817116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027344332,0.000012991835,0.9626192,0.0000072192183,0.000004621437,7.350075e-7,0.02653349,0.000053632655,2.9455703e-7,0.0060973,0.0042863386,0.00011076453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7077565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9815198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27376333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016317485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004708208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30499244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7108661447","doi":"10.1111/irel.70015","title":"The Impact of Canada's Working Income Tax Benefit on the Labor Supply of Low‐Income Workers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Receipt; Margin (machine learning); Income tax; State income tax; Tax credit; Exploit; Gross income","score_opus":0.021668546829052587,"score_gpt":0.2662464990108135,"score_spread":0.2445779521817609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7108661447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857319,0.0003156638,0.00003497921,0.0040679085,0.00042901386,0.00015686403,0.000033455522,0.0000019318625,0.00922831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986036,0.00029137734,0.000048818696,0.000067761415,0.00018940557,0.000001943982,6.3334295e-7,0.0000037323148,0.0007927613],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890715,0.00013013864,0.0005260279,0.00007402544,0.0001659025,0.00019673517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973115,0.0017028475,0.00056234683,0.00012265975,0.00022264534,0.000078020756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015578619,0.00008888262,0.00022105468,0.000041888943,0.00085535494,0.000067780726,0.00027453885,0.0001769396,0.000030796542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037006955,0.000055204,0.00023941066,0.00044615043,0.00028907505,0.00010339114,0.000029886121,0.0004904697,1.3125204e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046461097,0.00002639617,0.9246035,0.0000027414974,0.0004127739,4.2328762e-7,0.004946084,0.0047802967,0.0000025837453,0.059603292,0.0042708875,0.0013045513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015142377,0.00014711736,0.89862573,0.00043737068,0.00010600191,0.0000013380118,0.06445704,0.00061926304,0.0000089955265,0.019661348,0.014250873,0.00017069142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038604036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038411047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05951095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038246025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033378403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97913545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112772095","doi":"","title":"The effect of an unconditional government income transfer on the labour supply of lowincome workers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Receipt; Margin (machine learning); Government (linguistics); Labour supply; Income tax; Exploit","score_opus":0.006731148092702458,"score_gpt":0.24022352994911597,"score_spread":0.23349238185641352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112772095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6309258,0.000996622,0.000009757012,0.00047730247,0.0045181704,0.00084438955,0.0027227418,0.00009046504,0.35941476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7362863,0.0002752956,0.000038514263,0.00014601559,0.0007520373,0.00010239101,0.00004357636,0.0002443659,0.26211154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967281,0.00068403914,0.00054701755,0.00048580026,0.0010692043,0.0004858207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977142,0.0011555296,0.000252843,0.000660189,0.000047297493,0.00016991403],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017334668,0.00043615446,0.0006362241,0.00013645284,0.00032799237,0.000083005194,0.0009173947,0.00045061155,0.00346538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001217497,0.00027852738,0.0004198715,0.00032487643,0.0017129952,0.00007791436,0.000056317578,0.0005398594,0.00023711887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000988653,0.0001142529,0.7746927,0.00026277849,0.00084290834,0.000018049028,0.0024762226,0.000018739833,0.000019895178,0.10158851,0.119497396,0.0003696563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022142637,0.0014958092,0.29137513,0.0018588451,0.0006554448,0.000012473288,0.016720515,0.000037723763,0.00016407871,0.0041377875,0.6797369,0.0015909905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014881229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008586731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56023955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004454306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000546583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117468355","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5972594","title":"Childcare as Economic Infrastructure&amp;nbsp; Federal-Provincial Agreements and Maternal Labour Force Participation in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Labour supply; Baseline (sea); Parental leave; Work (physics); Work force; Current Population Survey; Percentage point","score_opus":0.006901103297891722,"score_gpt":0.26192044546507043,"score_spread":0.2550193421671787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117468355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99030066,0.0017447711,0.0005670447,0.0007309321,0.0036912188,0.00073025044,0.00028652532,0.00001459804,0.0019340244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680484,0.024774536,0.000066299755,0.0004269507,0.0010342279,0.000028711127,0.00006435997,0.000037606427,0.0055189338],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914549,0.0006144135,0.0014156919,0.0009466871,0.00086882914,0.004699473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978523,0.000085213265,0.0010365109,0.000364164,0.0002257336,0.00043607285],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019709188,0.0007457436,0.0008674964,0.00033238693,0.0014032379,0.0006592416,0.0010724929,0.0005587463,0.00021402587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011256961,0.00082102825,0.00019897097,0.0002779991,0.00017134227,0.00041346176,0.00050812424,0.005037363,0.000014941218],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017930716,0.00004849542,0.91952217,0.00010687586,0.0005245021,0.000011079118,0.0072461087,0.010564734,0.000013303174,0.04223463,0.00008273897,0.019466056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020103657,0.00016349046,0.67631847,0.00024087737,0.00015741814,0.00007361563,0.039708406,0.0014195229,0.0000069524217,0.27750435,0.0013941369,0.0010023881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96675307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24320368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027056035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10220458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124712554","doi":"10.64920/iccp25185","title":"Barriers to workplace economic mobility of women in Sri Lanka; Insights from World Bank gender statistics","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Descriptive statistics; Equal employment opportunity; Quarter (Canadian coin); Pension; Official statistics; Qualitative property; Gender analysis","score_opus":0.013206674967384285,"score_gpt":0.26991841901707087,"score_spread":0.25671174404968655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124712554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89825356,0.00027127168,0.0026621073,0.0002342042,0.0020221467,0.00075305806,0.00063378946,0.000035149948,0.09513472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886681,0.00031881503,0.0026513091,0.0011749855,0.00010638053,0.000050110277,0.000022407587,0.000016206788,0.0069917073],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957404,0.00057449914,0.001173772,0.0009350255,0.00037125248,0.00120506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970135,0.00093956717,0.00021207833,0.00069393875,0.00014864876,0.0009922502],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012263368,0.00039907233,0.0008943391,0.00051322026,0.00032171735,0.00014348749,0.00081010454,0.00030967096,0.0043851095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044344837,0.00043262917,0.000110208544,0.0014722708,0.00048434405,0.00023017946,0.00029054933,0.0003814009,0.00010497985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018867436,0.00020374524,0.5323662,0.00009211329,0.00023838214,0.0000061849855,0.3100123,0.0052046506,0.00005159288,0.14818762,0.002651568,0.0007969158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013521502,0.00008332797,0.4678924,0.00008227312,0.00007528629,3.536483e-8,0.40419132,0.0076716184,0.000043698696,0.10317991,0.014657672,0.0007703133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022643588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14761241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12496883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034586021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003389286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125194033","doi":"10.1093/polsoc/puaf048","title":"Gender-transformative social protection: returning to the feminist debates","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; CLARITY; Rhetorical question; Transformative learning; Power (physics); Field (mathematics); Social change; Public policy","score_opus":0.03417477831749641,"score_gpt":0.32532611567480746,"score_spread":0.291151337357311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125194033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50180095,0.00030680944,0.01847423,0.0807034,0.0006863078,0.0013278121,0.000072902614,0.0002492362,0.39637837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902261,0.00018661814,0.00018626684,0.0066572386,0.00060475094,0.000044447886,0.0000017920427,0.000004767922,0.0020880443],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916476,0.000111986024,0.00012306847,0.00014050656,0.00016483595,0.0002948465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997138,0.00006133916,0.00003159629,0.00006831463,0.000063005486,0.00006199142],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005637193,0.00008988471,0.000102622595,0.000024186502,0.0029770671,0.00013836708,0.00015299434,0.00012525354,0.0000063392135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009750293,0.000070193695,0.000100728095,0.0005478962,0.00027223036,0.00007682656,0.00004028291,0.0001944944,0.0000047660915],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049547725,0.000014184915,0.0010770595,0.0000311172,0.000053985365,1.5187521e-7,0.78509206,0.000007841364,0.000050259718,0.20453289,0.0046586483,0.004476839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003481906,0.000028654109,0.059952892,0.000020551286,0.000041281295,0.0000010487711,0.5506344,0.0005784767,0.000057255802,0.024945794,0.36313012,0.0002613338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027408218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005898631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48842514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011321038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032531295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99832094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125911113","doi":"10.46609/ijsser.2025.v10i11.027","title":"Gendered Incidence of Indirect Taxation in India’s Informal Economy: Evidence from Uttar Pradesh","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incidence (geometry); Uttar pradesh; Unemployment; Per capita; Tax incidence; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.07395774939260744,"score_gpt":0.40764449302421785,"score_spread":0.33368674363161044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125911113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96229655,0.0006996905,0.0000661094,0.002502528,0.001869104,0.0002728033,0.000034084915,0.0000031936775,0.032255925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99407375,0.004782728,0.00014084856,0.000163212,0.0006179471,0.0000063764664,0.00000204091,0.00000612956,0.00020698956],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953888,0.00042548068,0.001474548,0.00043588787,0.0015897957,0.00068549917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947131,0.0010508484,0.0014706658,0.00014629398,0.0024017359,0.00021735294],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015370417,0.00017892483,0.00049367954,0.0020394484,0.00069287483,0.00076575106,0.0024848825,0.00025562366,0.00016708877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030704655,0.0001914401,0.00012914611,0.0012812704,0.0033803422,0.0042961445,0.00060446124,0.0008402289,0.000014954722],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000387395,0.00017190682,0.7814388,0.000046014313,0.00022415069,0.000025656165,0.13385029,0.00024104898,0.0012575976,0.054460593,0.00062894577,0.027267573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080051663,0.00013330465,0.9227029,0.0003871035,0.000017161641,0.0000036050537,0.0507043,0.0026034198,0.00040727665,0.020606926,0.0014458073,0.00018766345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062945304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017035991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14126408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027148975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012040056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126021124","doi":"10.15353/rea.v17i4.6596","title":"An Empirical Study on Restrictive Laws and Regulations Affecting Women’s Economic Participation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Analysis","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empirical research; Mainstream; Poverty; Sustainable development; Politics; Economic stability; Distribution (mathematics)","score_opus":0.037389559021689917,"score_gpt":0.3992092448173851,"score_spread":0.36181968579569523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126021124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931865,0.0011135952,0.00020190903,0.00033047126,0.000069945505,0.0003509829,0.000012338744,0.000016818838,0.0047174427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938077,0.005720283,0.00005037851,0.00018934617,0.000040685743,0.000048286227,0.000010391746,0.0000040412274,0.00012889688],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986142,0.0004363773,0.00042925726,0.0002950604,0.000058185175,0.00016693227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991331,0.000244935,0.00022686498,0.00027933478,0.00003572577,0.00008005788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013504872,0.000093753566,0.00047609044,0.00023796002,0.00024115274,0.00003706964,0.00012635288,0.000046016637,0.000076853874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011016388,0.00009459354,0.00012033047,0.00039567586,0.000075297605,0.00014214634,0.000021792632,0.000057827343,0.000010069949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053115664,0.00016557719,0.9792066,0.000085431835,0.00064315856,1.91997e-7,0.008395085,0.002335821,7.536558e-7,0.006452149,0.00009316909,0.0026167044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019866112,0.00009941973,0.9677219,0.00010342929,0.0011133791,2.2847585e-8,0.02124149,0.007897666,6.50587e-7,0.0008501631,0.0006507635,0.00012247327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010797917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004042304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012846404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005510856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017578315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38574126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126244810","doi":"10.1504/ajesd.2025.151431","title":"Education and women's employment outcomes: evidence from Ethiopia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African J of Economic and Sustainable Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; Gouvernement du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Instrumental variable; Estimation; Selection bias; Selection (genetic algorithm); Developing country; Primary education; Average treatment effect; Econometric analysis","score_opus":0.014695110475381327,"score_gpt":0.2776729113048799,"score_spread":0.2629778008294986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126244810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876269,0.0007091269,0.00019644675,0.0011657638,0.00019978921,0.00024314396,0.000002242794,0.000015779728,0.00984082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97640353,0.0005599791,0.0012767009,0.0002998965,0.000016367143,0.000065831155,0.000002833127,0.0000045879547,0.021370258],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990086,0.000060678896,0.00026537076,0.0002490345,0.000076812794,0.00033949173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994095,0.00019140691,0.00008940229,0.0001191023,0.0000815068,0.0001090881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006457472,0.00010596911,0.00021644542,0.00012061069,0.00034453033,0.00006666177,0.00013849935,0.00006521138,0.000039473856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010340931,0.00010793511,0.00001658231,0.000099874844,0.00016175299,0.00017375551,0.00012003965,0.0000561332,0.0000024871433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017312956,0.0000696199,0.67611927,0.00008134924,0.000098033735,0.0000015206324,0.1675615,0.000010670878,0.0000052617274,0.14186342,0.0005271812,0.013644852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016102736,0.000015869557,0.47099683,0.000035750774,0.000010288761,6.484042e-8,0.47878718,0.000013180955,0.00000861925,0.013547854,0.03629361,0.00012972814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005767825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071792613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31122568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079785567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026319814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8719265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132866182","doi":"","title":"Household education and earnings: evidence from rural Peru","year":2002,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Earnings; Allocative efficiency; Wage; Household income; Labour supply; Rationing; Estimation; Poverty; Labor demand","score_opus":0.0356902352768956,"score_gpt":0.338846949742668,"score_spread":0.3031567144657724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132866182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9686705,0.015551403,0.0000619257,0.0005892677,0.003808027,0.0005460412,0.000020033867,0.000107752334,0.010645085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8691134,0.033584982,0.0004653875,0.00018331296,0.0010017762,0.000042949134,0.00021090521,0.00006412993,0.09533318],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968017,0.0003799466,0.00046200724,0.0008251352,0.0008811451,0.00065012043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978039,0.0004020813,0.000605716,0.0004554628,0.0003436858,0.0003891067],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043858643,0.00054823514,0.000533464,0.00017867445,0.0011581068,0.0004848481,0.00054491236,0.00079068396,0.00072026846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052675075,0.0006181375,0.00016169173,0.00062475324,0.00031089067,0.0005446125,0.000059168557,0.0007374755,0.00015243638],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035534118,0.00019737412,0.17705925,0.00013688533,0.00006960966,0.0000026619746,0.8111143,0.000046132547,0.0010465067,0.00023746831,0.0023531818,0.0077010635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014420478,0.00006593715,0.42343763,0.0007818593,0.00018929137,9.843241e-7,0.57133794,0.00041630387,0.000014792317,0.00015873532,0.0028984232,0.00055388256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04673134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004350185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24637836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002274242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091960223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132910229","doi":"","title":"Three Essays on the Social Determinants of Labour Supply","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Receipt; Labour supply; Earnings; Work (physics); Child labour; Public policy; Cash","score_opus":0.03154530083843361,"score_gpt":0.36153004606611083,"score_spread":0.32998474522767723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132910229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9522892,0.0002798172,0.000016999886,0.0009455439,0.003022088,0.00078440766,0.00022289266,0.000036695652,0.042402312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96132123,0.0006572186,0.000029430706,0.00027065937,0.0004965662,0.0000919325,0.00011048064,0.00006791489,0.036954544],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575365,0.00053914986,0.0005973996,0.00064329,0.001670967,0.000795562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975679,0.00052405894,0.000957192,0.0004949426,0.00033529924,0.000120595076],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013641984,0.00050714496,0.0007094856,0.00014894077,0.0031618748,0.00012240441,0.0014399459,0.0005472678,0.0051451134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002503249,0.00043870785,0.00041424573,0.001075963,0.0004690293,0.00008739069,0.00013666926,0.0009341457,0.000069800444],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023253044,0.00041339308,0.048607793,0.00028154004,0.00014748579,0.000020054322,0.7653733,0.00003683821,0.00028819754,0.17767712,0.0027190375,0.004202709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037025282,0.00023792306,0.23322038,0.00007032492,0.00013685538,5.633647e-7,0.7519013,0.0002895419,0.00007900177,0.0067149885,0.006435681,0.00054317876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011986483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032487966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1846126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002146444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001067848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134169167","doi":"10.64906/ijssc.2025.02.04.24","title":"EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT AND LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION AMONG SC/ST WOMEN IN RURAL INDIA","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Sciences and Commerce","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Niagara College","funders":"","keywords":"Caste; Educational attainment; Casual; Disadvantaged; Literacy; Wage; Affirmative action","score_opus":0.016650980546674292,"score_gpt":0.3466710744559561,"score_spread":0.3300200939092818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134169167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96984434,0.00065924245,0.000040146668,0.02276732,0.0017308019,0.00012964604,0.000024431693,0.0000044396747,0.0047996566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955092,0.001784245,0.00006408905,0.0013380883,0.0004946912,0.000010268462,0.0000025091433,0.000005807735,0.0007910962],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973945,0.00026795213,0.00069177605,0.00021896459,0.0009531249,0.00047366924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984737,0.0003292076,0.0005182161,0.00004343122,0.00046441954,0.00017103752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022960303,0.00016640697,0.00029312703,0.00035852718,0.0006945609,0.0005199188,0.0006168184,0.00013677814,0.00009747091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022891595,0.00015991315,0.00007317008,0.0007327447,0.0014892903,0.0007977405,0.00017598711,0.00028840854,7.983498e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004107137,0.00022566499,0.8623872,0.000009702424,0.000074968884,0.0000026942837,0.05057589,0.000031127795,0.0000232925,0.07786052,0.00048140404,0.008286483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006626933,0.00011764257,0.88335603,0.000120817094,0.000021857191,0.000002317893,0.09239551,0.000623547,0.0000014991103,0.020586113,0.0019704138,0.00014156043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072423375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007810094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05727441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006101466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009463864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6521069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7151993696","doi":"10.70675/fde75b4dz0029z42f6za573z6f3faae43e91","title":"Essays on Female Labor Force Participation in Developed Countries","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberian dollar; Research methodology; Wage; Limiting","score_opus":0.030048117646560273,"score_gpt":0.3495731351530545,"score_spread":0.3195250175064942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7151993696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88770384,0.00059694564,0.0001439657,0.00044906084,0.004384189,0.0008826223,0.00006100448,0.00020675173,0.10557162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8987539,0.002949112,0.00019083625,0.00064708135,0.0002682525,0.00032796542,0.00051331957,0.00009383856,0.09625571],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956709,0.00029415073,0.0010196968,0.00095379696,0.0011223675,0.00093910034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827546,0.0003667216,0.0002851966,0.00030917654,0.0005581886,0.00020523783],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011547522,0.00057767995,0.0006363444,0.00043751148,0.0005119953,0.0005256692,0.00045003236,0.000903276,0.00052837835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032999102,0.0005671049,0.0001463252,0.0019451735,0.00019672823,0.00035270708,0.000040424737,0.0006037403,0.0007552197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022370368,0.00037084482,0.07141555,0.0008457673,0.00013306059,0.000037366146,0.46786577,0.0012838552,0.000044173106,0.45540658,0.0009979634,0.0013753697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096311374,0.00030715566,0.3473701,0.0010946458,0.00029989547,3.5002307e-7,0.6042781,0.008899771,0.00023456913,0.015984576,0.018722283,0.0018454978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003196261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10432048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.439422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004805596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001974513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161370639","doi":"","title":"The EI family supplement and relative income in two-earner families with children","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"WinnSpace (University of Winnipeg)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Family income; Panel data; Socioeconomic status; Survey data collection; Foundation (evidence); Data collection; National Longitudinal Surveys","score_opus":0.008351720704374975,"score_gpt":0.22172412948706588,"score_spread":0.2133724087826909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161370639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29435936,0.0017277303,0.00013230038,0.0032052356,0.00017019526,0.0013123882,0.000349975,0.00009657172,0.69864625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14870214,0.010347933,0.0011166645,0.00012448714,0.00018876803,0.0000014806169,0.00014799956,0.00005609722,0.8393144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978834,0.00024855704,0.00018204599,0.0004963991,0.00067514187,0.00051450194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988212,0.0002289282,0.00026973966,0.00038953443,0.0001394545,0.00015116358],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053747627,0.00032755817,0.00049045216,0.00027752802,0.0010348908,0.00005628505,0.0006398462,0.00028132007,0.000078040764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015126306,0.00030577078,0.000108027525,0.00039722328,0.001959738,0.00034924535,0.00017957973,0.00059889955,0.000021075975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006477431,0.00020942316,0.46237677,0.00011878297,0.0011489562,0.00017420035,0.2805863,0.000469385,0.000009714328,0.2074997,0.040130187,0.0066288393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025950363,0.00024485425,0.51950973,0.00033632058,0.00026065693,0.0000034743246,0.16108604,0.00005534796,2.0093817e-7,0.007031147,0.30800924,0.0008679726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01756018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06997328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26787904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038319078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092083955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162015591","doi":"10.82308/54188","title":"Three essays in macroeconomics: wealth concentration and optimal progressive taxation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capital (architecture); Capital accumulation; Distribution of wealth; Distribution (mathematics)","score_opus":0.013219324448155762,"score_gpt":0.29378442876215866,"score_spread":0.2805651043140029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162015591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92495984,0.000535837,0.00039406365,0.0001227098,0.0009960601,0.0010172481,0.000022217047,0.000041857995,0.071910165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99246126,0.0012001733,0.0010613846,0.00009665941,0.0001759968,0.00005535207,0.0009622371,0.000023051052,0.003963887],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876016,0.00006356971,0.00030716887,0.0003620737,0.00019599235,0.00031105248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991286,0.000054777516,0.00049335405,0.00011786073,0.00012647372,0.00007892998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036488997,0.00017193322,0.00024547972,0.00006423003,0.00019000894,0.00015819927,0.00014180965,0.0003937549,0.00011175684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006540598,0.00018173546,0.000035785764,0.00012371426,0.00007697201,0.00026975232,0.000010553553,0.00020572245,0.000027198628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013920093,0.00012944611,0.46081942,0.00031197997,0.00006121059,0.0000076288443,0.119644,0.00030732364,0.00007876937,0.39572683,0.00058303395,0.02219117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001705836,0.0001638257,0.7029382,0.00022744392,0.000069739384,0.0000010652001,0.26308355,0.017495204,0.000036290552,0.011972593,0.0012878394,0.001018421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037992885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07137446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38375422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022756665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006981284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9455705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71825659","doi":"","title":"The Hindu Women's Question","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hinduism; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016640930208280235,"score_gpt":0.2667739367764818,"score_spread":0.2501330065682016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W71825659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9344239,0.0006838688,6.504471e-7,0.0019033673,0.00069200987,0.0001707446,0.000020217241,0.000049390543,0.062055826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537887,0.002996911,0.000015987303,0.0018161053,0.0003419979,0.00013593843,0.0000016415339,0.00001351557,0.04088921],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814606,0.00016754316,0.00015783068,0.00021104568,0.00025428904,0.0010632202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989716,0.00014476385,0.000034804376,0.0002018252,0.00013553596,0.0005115159],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008764749,0.00013616384,0.00016588079,0.00006884382,0.0028826958,0.00012818808,0.0002922872,0.00008014103,0.00025896597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002288763,0.000108979766,0.000033380795,0.00036293565,0.0005589033,0.00008927475,0.000015527963,0.000136086,0.00017818487],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000183594,0.000029738423,0.017720068,0.000019337445,0.00032820014,0.00004602785,0.73190933,0.000058890826,0.0000054094476,0.20685223,0.008245185,0.0347672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105754,0.00003187903,0.0062727476,0.000006656541,0.0000053002714,4.3247954e-7,0.49591148,0.0000067078954,1.6511045e-7,0.022434553,0.47506326,0.00016104688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009450574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30351102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4668181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002304979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073082733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W72827454","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Female Education on Fertility: Evidence from Turkey","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Grand Challenges Canada","keywords":"Fertility; Demography; Total fertility rate; Population; Instrumental variable; Family planning; Economics; Research methodology; Sociology","score_opus":0.039676217864746975,"score_gpt":0.290681322069725,"score_spread":0.25100510420497807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W72827454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871278,0.00035362635,0.0001469011,0.0011452268,0.000211395,0.00032304233,0.00003980123,0.000029323546,0.010622926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979468,0.00024907442,0.0005195413,0.000021940954,0.000032778404,6.7915033e-7,0.000008557309,0.000006653018,0.0012139792],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852055,0.0004202139,0.0001426175,0.00022236058,0.00043917305,0.0002550697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978892,0.0005822815,0.00020691694,0.0005501674,0.0006063919,0.00016503743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006348898,0.00011388052,0.00019615705,0.00009913599,0.0010275295,0.00018924836,0.0010136886,0.00012966843,0.00033036256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042606174,0.00010627281,0.00018357155,0.00043982817,0.00047887609,0.0017910751,0.00012709858,0.00030635708,0.00011337811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118824275,0.00040805637,0.9280896,0.000012088381,0.00012076713,0.0000013673963,0.04491889,0.000060699516,0.003986661,0.004844605,0.003986866,0.0134515315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014970796,0.000112555594,0.93815506,0.000058962567,0.000027027318,8.584078e-8,0.056283526,0.00021899967,0.00001321624,0.0042520235,0.0006210246,0.00010782641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19380997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014806346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17900363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023107136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074885425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82622886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W73525749","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.36.2.227","title":"Does Family Policy Environment Moderate the Effect of Single-Parenthood on Children’s Academic Achievement? A Study of 14 European Countries","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic achievement; Welfare; Developmental psychology; Psychology; Single mothers; Single parent; Demographic economics; Political science; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.049632105871364844,"score_gpt":0.34080349854687375,"score_spread":0.2911713926755089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W73525749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99211985,0.004164912,0.00007731459,0.0009745364,0.0003419129,0.00072455563,0.00004093799,0.00001213824,0.0015438277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99514765,0.0037672294,0.00005434322,0.00025845264,0.0006045258,0.000009016533,0.0000010064813,0.000017323971,0.00014042747],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99498904,0.0020756796,0.0010897389,0.00023658041,0.0012326441,0.00037632836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723804,0.0007884703,0.001305774,0.00024116275,0.00032914404,0.00009743215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020751408,0.00034403527,0.001006041,0.00023461075,0.000613392,0.000038899478,0.00064045313,0.000059568498,0.000002179029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012569985,0.00017487362,0.00020174238,0.0002794199,0.00082719274,0.000186704,0.0001577908,0.00047600755,0.000005916468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014192438,0.0022187424,0.36359203,0.00004778583,0.004098928,0.000008892415,0.58335453,0.035537645,0.0026559716,0.0020238066,0.0032455374,0.0017968797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002881251,0.0056893695,0.72671056,0.0001661378,0.000371758,0.0000011747734,0.2611541,0.000042981716,0.0008885022,0.00023757669,0.0015798127,0.00027676462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000116656076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014338778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36311856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002979917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001071297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7131139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W744838098","doi":"","title":"Counting on Marilyn Waring: New advances in feminist economics Toronto [Book Review]","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Publishing; Media studies; Project commissioning; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.015827506383768074,"score_gpt":0.2933166084890871,"score_spread":0.277489102105319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W744838098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1951927,0.14651318,0.00033119478,0.022364913,0.0048222383,0.001174774,0.00001730101,0.0002738634,0.62930983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23527293,0.5664611,0.0009837874,0.09280314,0.0049680057,0.00003664451,0.000080163874,0.000077358265,0.09931686],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985275,0.00021745148,0.00032293395,0.00033955218,0.000101257865,0.0004912842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991115,0.00032780078,0.0001548424,0.000201228,0.000026324138,0.00017830606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008321743,0.0001572707,0.0003923735,0.000024983612,0.00022964399,0.000025876976,0.00030216813,0.0002673878,0.00024091135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021151033,0.00015403044,0.0000741577,0.00004487472,0.00019741266,0.0002222714,0.000038868475,0.00020505185,0.000055951736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047790825,0.00008477972,0.41883922,0.00011848899,0.0000335564,0.0000037759942,0.05828362,0.00013457137,0.0000047984067,0.22471,0.25644433,0.041295055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044462094,0.00007148733,0.016273387,0.00006823792,0.000010597356,5.976917e-7,0.0023798689,0.000039223392,2.70011e-7,0.008007485,0.972524,0.0001802435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008629232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026247261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71607965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031201338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038055363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99797237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W75489384","doi":"10.18584/iipj.2013.4.4.1","title":"Pathways to Higher Education for Native Hawaiian Individual Development Account Participants","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Indigenous Policy Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Hawaii Community Foundation","keywords":"Native Hawaiians; Graduation (instrument); Indigenous; Asset (computer security); Receipt; Unemployment; Welfare; Psychological intervention; Demographic economics; Gerontology; Sociology; Economic growth; Psychology; Economics; Demography; Medicine; Pacific islanders; Population; Accounting","score_opus":0.0837999851720656,"score_gpt":0.3721549008686296,"score_spread":0.288354915696564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W75489384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710161,0.00005732652,0.0006941957,0.0050706314,0.0028595072,0.0007352616,0.00007024419,0.000040046427,0.019456685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98319554,0.00004531658,0.0038339214,0.0037877008,0.0034241239,0.00022671683,0.000035598994,0.000023461354,0.0054276045],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778306,0.0000802482,0.00043359894,0.00020550132,0.00079423515,0.00070333434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802256,0.000118764714,0.00023305007,0.000093371076,0.0010750389,0.00045720724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064959953,0.00016092871,0.00014601037,0.00045829502,0.0011590266,0.0006383984,0.0007142528,0.000117715485,0.00041642642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028626152,0.00015485132,0.0000796537,0.000253741,0.0000697772,0.00048370438,0.00006324783,0.0001984424,0.00021382584],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034768367,0.0009671338,0.062954865,0.000010921725,0.000510482,0.0000050102362,0.6619909,0.00014273159,0.00027264017,0.19227771,0.016243888,0.06458894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056865334,0.00013671826,0.5755564,0.00005638239,0.000024545487,0.000017704528,0.03343397,0.00001654048,0.00009118304,0.054907817,0.3347223,0.00046779355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002765358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000891374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62855697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012997772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052016964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92275864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W785464703","doi":"","title":"Demand for Liquidity and Welfare Cost of Ination by Cohort and Age of Households","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Market liquidity; Liberian dollar; Consumption (sociology); Welfare; Economics; Cohort; Monetary economics; Demographic economics; Finance; Medicine; Internal medicine; Market economy","score_opus":0.03760180224355271,"score_gpt":0.32668279896143226,"score_spread":0.28908099671787957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W785464703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98776865,0.00025922875,0.00003714939,0.0002447636,0.00014463498,0.001563261,0.0003519443,0.000010884973,0.009619468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96876544,0.030059393,0.00035694966,0.000013374784,0.000051645893,0.00017423523,0.00010436306,0.000021633217,0.00045297327],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982911,0.00023761336,0.00042963377,0.0004511927,0.00022037959,0.0003700841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986994,0.00040826082,0.00021578518,0.00029908048,0.00023809889,0.00013933686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025969401,0.00014594846,0.00044554172,0.00015703803,0.00020621695,0.0000770586,0.00028974406,0.00045360593,0.000011381435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004934091,0.0001631542,0.000057829257,0.000071672905,0.00089012994,0.00010404065,0.00035901595,0.0003746477,1.2021516e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017241521,0.0003864571,0.8670762,0.0018420503,0.00029497413,0.0000038106357,0.017948037,0.0017459551,0.00078076904,0.016573977,0.0005113502,0.09266402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019909854,0.0003836671,0.9047421,0.00030029158,0.00006421846,0.0000013742676,0.028496727,0.009791754,0.00019159676,0.0134489015,0.039730527,0.00085782673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020134095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002134604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09180619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026079104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027985606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6653235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W811313881","doi":"","title":"Opportunity Denied: Limiting Black Women to Devalued Work (review)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Limiting; Work (physics); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.04474826489902884,"score_gpt":0.29225456946900663,"score_spread":0.2475063045699778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W811313881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9577218,0.0039664763,0.0002058622,0.0012201889,0.0005610112,0.0004426543,0.000019845967,0.00016844571,0.035693668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652096,0.004804296,0.0010729447,0.007769509,0.00066891557,0.000054455562,0.000009147033,0.000036230245,0.020374924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719,0.0004339793,0.00035114065,0.0002811866,0.00054286676,0.0012008017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981319,0.00012424191,0.00012214233,0.00035035083,0.0001789861,0.0010924175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025315918,0.0002107566,0.00033641595,0.00006558544,0.0005256296,0.000068848276,0.00048090637,0.0001498227,0.0007270503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006440651,0.00021770042,0.00008762933,0.00085808703,0.00018288258,0.00027133757,0.000079949954,0.00025011753,0.00064589514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059005855,0.00089567486,0.4215238,0.0007031572,0.00019297769,0.000024396519,0.3728423,0.00005456311,0.00044364034,0.06257389,0.057673134,0.08301344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044471282,0.000053684063,0.49533102,0.00024679326,0.000045999925,0.0000017275352,0.07009668,0.000009358728,0.00001736877,0.00062053837,0.43241623,0.00071588863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008415494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052327855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3747431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022497954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000402178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8877566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W8423967","doi":"","title":"The Status of TANF Leavers in the District of Columbia: Final Report.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Welfare; Sample (material); Demography; Socioeconomics; Human services; Geography; Economic growth; Political science; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.031130215139146745,"score_gpt":0.2908914707450298,"score_spread":0.25976125560588303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W8423967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83224595,0.00008288045,0.00011713829,0.00035972925,0.0001274891,0.00012820918,0.000006876351,0.000006748036,0.16692501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99188125,0.0012789845,0.00006284258,0.000054938813,0.000025396861,0.0000033952294,0.000002729698,0.0000023742325,0.006688116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988677,0.0001265097,0.00024576596,0.00009058062,0.0003623896,0.00030708793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928963,0.00026361883,0.00012559096,0.00019901711,0.000082722574,0.00003940638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007945343,0.00004035556,0.000092052,0.00001522183,0.0002090358,0.000033491706,0.00025247887,0.000045362718,0.00005127348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036908864,0.00002731622,0.000046783534,0.00047877533,0.00033548093,0.000045453486,0.000018832046,0.000078228586,0.0000013387295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008657301,0.00006629939,0.96839637,0.00000301798,0.000008702606,0.000026162968,0.0093051195,0.00002406878,0.000013431926,0.015301882,0.0036067176,0.003239551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015092568,0.000029712362,0.84201944,0.0000029051837,0.00000742613,0.0000027141486,0.10263459,0.000057149966,0.0000015617011,0.0016724631,0.05337507,0.000046063586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08101329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24444863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16343534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052615324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002724628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92510635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W890296400","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2816","title":"Uncovering Women in Taxation: The Gender Impact of Detaxation, Tax Expenditures, and Joint Tax/Benefit Units","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Joint (building); Economics; Politics; Public economics; Tax reform; Indirect tax; Direct tax; Democracy; Progressive tax; Tax policy; Economic policy; Labour economics; Political science; State income tax; Law; Gross income","score_opus":0.04885574430909785,"score_gpt":0.28849791679935316,"score_spread":0.23964217249025532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W890296400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90912384,0.0007306415,0.00043372117,0.00020012904,0.0003492511,0.00014971917,0.000023914705,0.00001247168,0.08897634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986881,0.0003432683,0.0003174077,0.00008650111,0.0002780152,0.0000064135806,0.0000032181576,0.0000130920225,0.00026400542],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981481,0.00023534062,0.00037292592,0.0001443999,0.0006550219,0.00044421412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848855,0.000064097396,0.0005723279,0.00015381527,0.00040130373,0.00031991268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024322227,0.00013772832,0.00021960339,0.00008778074,0.00049741677,0.00018185891,0.00022291752,0.0001101261,0.00007196425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004016457,0.000098451506,0.00005786211,0.00026812986,0.00018238333,0.00040636584,0.00005292199,0.00029786874,0.0000031167904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000986656,0.00016185828,0.3948526,0.000028494313,0.00021885103,0.000045591063,0.20877519,0.030638123,0.0003023917,0.36100718,0.0020564632,0.0018145785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020190866,0.00022919073,0.50587124,0.00006821117,0.000035107034,0.000106459345,0.12206889,0.00066356856,0.00003754993,0.36393037,0.0045349495,0.00043538384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06350717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16951665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11101861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006570698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058045704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.942729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89213157","doi":"10.7202/010297ar","title":"Effet de la précarité économique sur la formation d’une première union au Canada","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.006852848131560885,"score_gpt":0.21098146636610884,"score_spread":0.20412861823454795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W89213157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95048,0.0037760744,0.0032532688,0.0038623994,0.0014853155,0.00046490695,0.00015221987,0.00011086831,0.036414936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98928493,0.0061973687,0.0006732453,0.0010437426,0.00050507486,0.00005055741,0.00007416084,0.00005678798,0.002114137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964678,0.0011239604,0.00049210683,0.00043918568,0.00032647062,0.0011504648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997839,0.00070342474,0.00026427457,0.00038764378,0.00017991452,0.0006257486],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017699659,0.00041214869,0.00040157133,0.0002629351,0.00087112514,0.0001566099,0.000534721,0.0010557602,0.000015704532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002966277,0.0004919104,0.0002664835,0.0017089896,0.0020083766,0.000657341,0.0000412464,0.00084768055,0.0000056450294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005603626,0.0004148468,0.22389077,0.00063878024,0.000370951,0.00029447474,0.12830624,0.009757653,0.00025199764,0.60424036,0.0124648865,0.019312998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028195395,0.00020960944,0.27071735,0.0005164153,0.00041039992,0.00016180048,0.07040446,0.001041332,0.00017945556,0.034625,0.61736584,0.0015487773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98629946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60490096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004622609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0111802155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W915136034","doi":"","title":"Social Production and Reproduction at the Interfaces of Public and Private Spheres","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Gender Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reproduction; Sociology; Public sphere; Private sphere; Social reproduction; Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Social science; Political science; Law; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.26037273197101074,"score_gpt":0.4447495647143584,"score_spread":0.18437683274334765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W915136034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9673424,0.015439971,0.000004930004,0.016148828,0.00028910267,0.00021646473,4.3506012e-7,0.0000035465187,0.000554331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812366,0.017662916,0.00011248638,0.000009888398,0.00039281,0.0000070961055,7.3011336e-8,0.000004434442,0.0005737039],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979523,0.0006944413,0.000286544,0.00016398141,0.0006408557,0.00026187865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849427,0.00018716244,0.00017590504,0.000094731,0.0010002132,0.000047738296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052936943,0.00006238779,0.00017710484,0.00016248818,0.00065011485,0.00007805747,0.0001396212,0.00004459175,0.000012258984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018572061,0.000039721468,0.000024385547,0.0004162244,0.0014749472,0.00037352668,0.00020014629,0.00028346526,0.0000010008373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044835466,0.00009257242,0.7525325,0.00017638577,0.00025583434,0.0000029806047,0.20633744,0.000010442749,0.0020710663,0.0036317501,0.017123679,0.017720561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018340115,0.00011056597,0.4036033,0.00004170057,0.000010399958,0.000011164348,0.5732108,0.000005922101,0.00023619489,0.01942951,0.0030931048,0.00006401278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000327875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016923897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3668733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014381114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001000139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5434504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W91977020","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00416.x","title":"Children as consumers: investigating child diary expenditure data","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commodity; Consumer Expenditure Survey; Clothing; Economics; Child obesity; Consumer expenditure; Child care; Demographic economics; Psychology; Public economics; Childhood obesity; Medicine; Aggregate expenditure; Geography; Obesity; Pediatrics; Finance","score_opus":0.12047287486683238,"score_gpt":0.23273714303659704,"score_spread":0.11226426816976466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W91977020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817584,0.0007322228,0.00009252169,0.0024477087,0.002534222,0.0002977358,0.00043716314,0.000014711354,0.011685272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936788,0.00037802535,0.0008920121,0.0020518515,0.0024907459,0.0000022730271,0.0001336404,0.000056577846,0.00031604944],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708307,0.00015884785,0.0009540946,0.0004904228,0.00000965266,0.0013039042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941245,0.0002994937,0.0007532521,0.0007250625,0.00018892351,0.003908801],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036257824,0.00030613225,0.00054210983,0.00064068584,0.0008787733,0.0002745828,0.0018450262,0.00036531055,0.00023673856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011142252,0.00038688254,0.0001568079,0.00020907658,0.0006606887,0.0009961724,0.000064289285,0.00071040314,0.000035215497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023415272,0.000021561103,0.53565735,0.000020285224,0.0003727785,0.00031678576,0.022766141,0.000601894,0.000006824218,0.43030807,0.0033375565,0.0065673506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003556489,0.0005579635,0.2682851,0.00064813806,0.00043404454,0.0028425574,0.104582496,0.00120979,0.00008036866,0.29809114,0.31605992,0.0036519696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6146584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38231483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019476466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064586527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93116198","doi":"","title":"Failure to launch: Cross-national trends in the transition to economic independence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Independence (probability theory); Demographic economics; Wage; Economics; Demography; Geography; Political science; Development economics; Labour economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02694420071983883,"score_gpt":0.31321637336589003,"score_spread":0.2862721726460512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93116198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9153779,0.00011975995,0.0009936087,0.004468929,0.00368171,0.00079637556,0.000783756,0.000114706796,0.07366326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912955,0.000045890585,0.0012917566,0.0034270934,0.0014979761,0.00017546945,0.00014259962,0.00004164086,0.0020820303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958139,0.00037898176,0.00087051373,0.0011245693,0.0009047499,0.00090730365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980671,0.00035569465,0.00027346335,0.0006187128,0.00026896698,0.00041605247],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004022245,0.00050130975,0.00056924927,0.0010963114,0.000607613,0.00052444363,0.0015221322,0.0009872479,0.0013524528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017056942,0.00051849335,0.00032577387,0.00057220535,0.00050357403,0.00034653215,0.00021563304,0.0012360921,0.0006329164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006612865,0.00020457552,0.8235354,0.000044693566,0.00009618595,0.00004205581,0.104235046,0.017481983,0.000020618972,0.031208333,0.021224242,0.0018407475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067733554,0.00007708126,0.9148233,0.0001019262,0.000037550806,0.000020740878,0.014521471,0.0003328267,0.000007795088,0.00512782,0.06308391,0.0011882482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003953107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10931138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10535827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021094312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002198691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W985688087","doi":"10.7202/029010ar","title":"Labour Supply Implications of a Negative Income Tax Plan","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour supply; Economics; Labour economics; Work (physics); Income tax; Plan (archaeology); Gross income; Business; State income tax; Tax reform; Public economics; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.02894462910739055,"score_gpt":0.2844743482014301,"score_spread":0.25552971909403954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W985688087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9163986,0.00013347992,0.0012970411,0.008059467,0.000102707825,0.00029478446,0.00032525463,0.000069917674,0.07331874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98451614,0.0002000253,0.0020126055,0.000085854896,0.00019071544,0.000020151514,0.000027515987,0.0000094365705,0.012937545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990308,0.00010719966,0.000276488,0.00015896806,0.00020192999,0.0002245579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990288,0.00030867764,0.00014466966,0.0002219969,0.00019265564,0.00010320401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025264855,0.00008994744,0.00012570496,0.00013698151,0.0005534583,0.000039224855,0.00025219892,0.00025323775,0.0002726232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033885572,0.00009464377,0.000050264418,0.0008210826,0.00025136708,0.00035426117,0.000034461944,0.00025119982,0.00006220155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024952865,0.00006624879,0.45147938,7.4418404e-7,0.00002737581,2.0763083e-7,0.014734704,0.00090504787,0.0000345343,0.5284041,0.0020100095,0.0023351538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000388798,0.00002715825,0.7889108,0.000023154482,0.00003456452,0.0000010672769,0.030327637,0.00016676405,0.000061103354,0.010965063,0.16888885,0.00020503567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016590715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032279585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51743907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012443907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005001766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42568094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}