{"meta":{"query_hash":"39743aa4764f","filters":{"topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics"},"cohort_total":1528,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":1528,"exported":1528,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/39743aa4764f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Gender%2C+Labor%2C+and+Family+Dynamics"},"results":[{"id":"W100331388","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.34.3.357","title":"Ethnicity and Inequality: British Children’s Experience of Means-Tested Benefits","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Ethnic group; Poverty; Disadvantage; Inequality; Welfare; Welfare dependency; Demographic economics; Demography; Sociology; Economics; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.1217293519850453,"score_gpt":0.37618000481899805,"score_spread":0.25445065283395274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W100331388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99423593,0.00033538596,0.000016651577,0.0005155659,0.000008897473,0.0000021117032,0.0000400882,0.0000015383273,0.0048439126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981085,0.00028600276,0.00002604958,0.00006007535,0.0000031612637,0.000004072792,0.000023383003,0.0000032947642,0.0014854039],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980355,0.00056783884,0.00007330836,0.00009168868,0.00039377203,0.0008378943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841464,0.00031121328,0.0004222844,0.000062209954,0.0002787823,0.00051086285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009938305,0.00014085823,0.00047399415,0.0006871239,0.0050799935,0.0021509428,0.00038545183,0.0005020665,0.0030416327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034659887,0.00023895783,0.00018612636,0.0012233084,0.0019131973,0.0009992237,0.003172858,0.0012145449,0.00027309943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001531611,0.000071152936,0.27164632,0.00005886518,0.000014981309,0.0027403007,0.6934718,0.0000671741,0.0010069497,0.0041567725,0.001965108,0.02464734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054369334,0.000101276935,0.48955634,0.00008049422,0.000011355959,0.0016369254,0.48999518,0.00006800151,0.00014017918,0.00043814708,0.017936725,0.000029825042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37055796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5218381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37055796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037589655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021598798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73680216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W100422282","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.31.1.19","title":"Intermittent Employment Among Married Women: A Comparative Study of Buenos Aires and Mexico City","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Demographic economics; Mexico city; Socioeconomics; Geography; Economic growth; Economics; Demography; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.10257161441217501,"score_gpt":0.37599021007206135,"score_spread":0.27341859565988635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W100422282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99919313,0.00019974074,0.000012209796,0.000047937865,0.0000032696755,0.0000068330774,0.00013881075,5.672278e-7,0.0003975893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998552,0.00055141404,0.00004182727,0.000054893673,0.0000105736835,0.000020026077,0.00034403696,0.000001345908,0.00042379464],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997837,0.000049643197,0.0000123340915,0.00004069558,0.000030270028,0.00008341053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995932,0.000053813237,0.00015280396,0.000020239402,0.00005593776,0.00012411659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003851178,0.00023695495,0.00037321917,0.0016025687,0.0015649013,0.00076020136,0.0003646808,0.00042160763,0.0021231975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008708565,0.0002955257,0.00020439715,0.0019942445,0.00040517672,0.0005168198,0.0007117263,0.00041224837,0.00016284896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001449932,0.00016584125,0.98429155,0.000036558984,0.0000525939,0.0004541639,0.009330768,0.000021991684,0.0003674676,0.00008814098,0.0003087462,0.0047372156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005706026,0.00004749721,0.9894203,0.000011270017,0.00001311437,0.00010547238,0.009735624,0.000016816986,0.000021124431,0.0000051199877,0.0006154336,0.0000024768751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17978461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32395428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17978461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010855182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005301774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3574763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W100894451","doi":"","title":"An econometric analysis of the “backward-bending” labour supply of Canadian women","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - IWU (Illinois Wesleyan University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Econometric analysis; Economics; Labour supply; Econometric model; Labour economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.014866160246936506,"score_gpt":0.20464315419536763,"score_spread":0.18977699394843112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W100894451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992316,0.00014481327,0.0008680125,0.00036466794,0.000004932145,0.00003541776,0.002159626,0.000013283737,0.004093155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932875,0.00020854047,0.00081111625,0.000049068272,0.0000057207835,0.00002058619,0.0018539317,0.0000051941247,0.0037584677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951065,0.00006992336,0.000015839683,0.00005905469,0.00013109256,0.00021348627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906,0.0003382194,0.00010885081,0.000043180917,0.00035811873,0.00009163028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082222925,0.00025878145,0.00033430377,0.0014916494,0.0015770632,0.0008315991,0.0006428506,0.00030648173,0.003188055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003403248,0.0002593654,0.0005026327,0.003308123,0.0006332114,0.00028975916,0.0005018029,0.00047426438,0.00025161463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044052105,0.00015454122,0.8824738,0.00014959947,0.0001608431,0.0005026685,0.006724822,0.042460255,0.0024424507,0.016110508,0.005523011,0.042856913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012256211,0.0000503855,0.94885385,0.000030386416,0.000053467116,0.000050433187,0.0074528707,0.036289122,0.00033176033,0.0006815679,0.0061401958,0.00005377229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9876686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020082386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020082386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015900578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14570856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W104706969","doi":"10.1086/719732","title":"Mother’s Time Allocation, Child Care and Child Cognitive Development","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Human Capital","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; Collegio Carlo Alberto; York University","keywords":"Child care; Time allocation; Cognition; Productivity; Child development; Cognitive development; Psychology; Paternal care; Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Medicine; Economics; Nursing; Economic growth; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.014038060586379793,"score_gpt":0.27551968021855266,"score_spread":0.26148161963217287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W104706969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99792296,0.00026315515,0.00007708982,0.00016327774,0.000006068581,0.000001257302,0.00012651442,0.000001630274,0.0014380595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990695,0.00011405562,0.00007117245,0.000013645484,0.000002693829,0.00000282791,0.000049617665,0.0000017901251,0.0006746864],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970716,0.00010980931,0.00001117538,0.000044200242,0.00003968876,0.00008796456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972138,0.0015149335,0.0006161489,0.00016292366,0.00011041728,0.00038177465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009808498,0.00016371881,0.00018865458,0.00042306405,0.00033097304,0.0009508963,0.00038510733,0.00038435438,0.0055654976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005172597,0.00015240678,0.00023842734,0.00057278917,0.00038595614,0.00041597785,0.00057529256,0.00043883928,0.00022335183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036208343,0.0003975482,0.9701642,0.000033146018,0.00016968066,0.0004372853,0.0032117355,0.00049232686,0.0012797716,0.0021090906,0.0006412738,0.020701727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005403899,0.000052162464,0.99715793,0.000012837841,0.000027266287,0.00006876056,0.0013322764,0.00023417694,0.00022129917,0.0004697188,0.00041389395,0.0000041887606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02024316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020848934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02024316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005594586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062685343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04025066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W105088709","doi":"10.18584/iipj.2013.4.1.9","title":"The Socio-Economic Characteristics of First Nation Teen Mothers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Indigenous Policy Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Aboriginal Affairs Northern Dev Canada; Statistics Canada","funders":"Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada","keywords":"Census; Indigenous; Cohort; Socioeconomic status; Geography; Socioeconomics; Demography; Medicine; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.023838269982370597,"score_gpt":0.2967967989636884,"score_spread":0.2729585289813178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W105088709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989254,0.0000980278,0.000016252137,0.000034166173,0.0000032300143,0.0000051296315,0.00026073,7.052144e-7,0.00065636024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988965,0.0002841962,0.000056837012,0.000019477488,0.0000037472382,0.000014792331,0.00030320522,9.711123e-7,0.00042024453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985385,0.00003552693,0.000012943269,0.000016919063,0.000039882416,0.000040722465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945015,0.00010747185,0.00022654835,0.000018733888,0.0000714554,0.00012566504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034690832,0.000091146976,0.00013556007,0.00067283586,0.00042720098,0.00037531354,0.00013204034,0.00012610127,0.0014893684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018023461,0.000119552744,0.00015180458,0.0005335156,0.00014181713,0.00025701453,0.00031270197,0.00021410995,0.0002032114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008152338,0.00001864075,0.9969693,0.00000777111,0.000007302093,0.00008468327,0.0010616927,0.000012038233,0.00011640786,0.000036250116,0.000098431345,0.0015793798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.9352465e-7,0.000028822078,0.9968215,0.0000095401465,0.0000038111868,0.00013985933,0.002501975,0.000027387998,0.000037740578,0.000011866611,0.0004151098,0.0000017645597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021951832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0296434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97804815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003096289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034850158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043648124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W118014008","doi":"10.7202/010149ar","title":"Fécondité et travail féminin en Grèce’: un modèle micro-économique","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014454518179317555,"score_gpt":0.23339252188463236,"score_spread":0.2189380037053148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W118014008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81865734,0.0024143388,0.1102932,0.0058224252,0.00024227599,0.0002652758,0.0032281796,0.00037915545,0.058697805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93718606,0.0015305429,0.0094942255,0.00018029723,0.000058257774,0.00022459762,0.0011016079,0.000053696964,0.05017084],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994312,0.00025916222,0.000014812888,0.0001225026,0.00006732983,0.00010507182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991115,0.000534477,0.00013325262,0.00006201067,0.000097879114,0.000060836337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012335295,0.00082771585,0.00079152203,0.0008188913,0.0005619145,0.0028148969,0.0016215947,0.0017011021,0.014205689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024546422,0.0005844103,0.0014593092,0.0012108543,0.001094826,0.0013294765,0.0012223456,0.0015557047,0.0022952973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010398793,0.00055670494,0.17111106,0.00025894569,0.0010121526,0.001496788,0.0036755635,0.5086627,0.0015995464,0.2519906,0.0080468645,0.050549325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029364458,0.00046184615,0.047482867,0.00014091948,0.0004036181,0.00041536134,0.0015427897,0.84725046,0.00064388284,0.05890364,0.042355612,0.00010540238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06701774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036341056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06701774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002391872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019165676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1332553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W118247452","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2533736","title":"Marriage Gains: Who Should You Marry ?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Computer science; World Wide Web; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.020092643210033106,"score_gpt":0.28799715868208126,"score_spread":0.26790451547204813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W118247452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51856005,0.009860883,0.00088810804,0.392448,0.0025041557,0.000056960813,0.0004082559,0.00003264116,0.07524087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972667,0.003111572,0.00019484908,0.0075241937,0.0009220013,0.000019519957,0.000052874602,0.000018095292,0.015489937],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999052,0.00045266032,0.000026848884,0.0000617683,0.00012767324,0.0002791548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968154,0.0008926021,0.00052986137,0.000085110034,0.0003963382,0.0012808073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027782933,0.00013371753,0.00036137726,0.00047612927,0.0025982352,0.0028007394,0.000450756,0.0019843243,0.01968219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014790799,0.00014932863,0.0001526565,0.00042495856,0.002411035,0.003844771,0.0011305177,0.0037371435,0.0024164557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096068776,0.0010591028,0.26047552,0.0002457541,0.0000995805,0.0013243383,0.057072703,0.00023319692,0.0008697328,0.1096443,0.17453341,0.3934816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012502722,0.0006136567,0.22307847,0.0011830934,0.00011318569,0.0020390796,0.420697,0.0011428832,0.00072132726,0.14270328,0.20742972,0.00015332313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004255011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01123623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01968219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000746667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014971516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06584352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W120280540","doi":"","title":"Farewell to Patriarchy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.02767680652049004,"score_gpt":0.2929412875239104,"score_spread":0.26526448100342037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W120280540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093976706,0.040907916,0.0013199172,0.23731846,0.002452031,0.000055674824,0.0003814766,0.00006875618,0.62351906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8113759,0.0132214995,0.0005782979,0.019642126,0.00044985474,0.000040916715,0.00008086512,0.00006436692,0.15454614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698704,0.00079150294,0.000045895278,0.00030273353,0.00059486576,0.0012779857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734783,0.00082539755,0.00016958239,0.0001998737,0.0007933778,0.00066397357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001989776,0.0004859188,0.0005399359,0.0026471235,0.033976004,0.0075874603,0.0012026912,0.0027010478,0.0172504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068021724,0.00027989698,0.00028223044,0.004702542,0.037496492,0.003947105,0.0031620974,0.0046768654,0.0006244944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035647055,0.000022578382,0.0024042407,0.00010034095,0.00000667615,0.00015983186,0.079206616,0.000054387052,0.000119411176,0.8397213,0.053015918,0.025152873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016127222,0.000018513205,0.011734824,0.00051780784,0.000013242871,0.00012807804,0.13034011,0.00007121502,0.00011701353,0.057729837,0.7992838,0.000029400608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9727931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98424166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06533083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09189148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4740106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1203555955","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-46439-7_13","title":"Relevant Irrelevance: The Relevance of Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives in Family Bargaining","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Bargaining problem; Economics; Class (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); Relevance (law); Property (philosophy); Axiom independence; Microeconomics; Argument (complex analysis); Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Game theory; Social choice theory; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.0785210211365463,"score_gpt":0.35607410631128045,"score_spread":0.27755308517473415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1203555955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04522083,0.009057023,0.28355184,0.01723364,0.0008638213,0.0001382089,0.00017497069,0.000051244107,0.64370835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9287001,0.003690444,0.026068438,0.0020396025,0.0014250104,0.00033539956,0.000097719676,0.00012955128,0.037513785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99293053,0.004353378,0.00023647347,0.00079065905,0.001156564,0.0005323707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98424375,0.013116623,0.000563614,0.0013264207,0.00052588567,0.0002237172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010612062,0.00096091995,0.0017316929,0.0011068824,0.0033264884,0.0043841535,0.0028818098,0.003404961,0.00992841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024943965,0.00078960485,0.002077577,0.0014237305,0.021526383,0.012069263,0.0031391303,0.013346932,0.00071163476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008635067,0.000010283796,0.000034975394,0.000013730132,0.000005904394,0.000013888574,0.0001678225,0.00037869098,0.000030946874,0.9973832,0.00040697938,0.0015450185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040397254,0.0000025205377,0.000027913236,0.000009620667,0.0000027553474,0.0000065524837,0.000022312983,0.00044959574,0.000017870025,0.998735,0.000719678,0.0000021626702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018461032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021430259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010612062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030414027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021162098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0561226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W126940234","doi":"","title":"Australian labour supply elasticities: Comparison and critical review","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour supply; Economics; Elasticity (physics); Wage; Population; Price elasticity of supply; Labour economics; Econometrics; Price elasticity of demand; Demographic economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.08001651064690686,"score_gpt":0.40762431243913166,"score_spread":0.3276078017922248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W126940234","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013265862,0.989985,0.00057870307,0.003186132,0.0011436181,0.00022351029,0.0004922648,0.000014618983,0.0030495962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008766105,0.9864146,0.0010856759,0.001558261,0.00048037636,0.00032614337,0.0004165164,0.000018032668,0.0009342819],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99237365,0.0019804153,0.0021408708,0.00056134054,0.0027228114,0.00022095308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9667831,0.02052004,0.002912485,0.00064446504,0.008770427,0.00036956143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0119258445,0.0012540909,0.0026341807,0.026040083,0.0010511226,0.0031310562,0.0020954302,0.0016362166,0.0071195005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055281408,0.001209191,0.0025793223,0.026035668,0.0013896617,0.0040668086,0.0021805158,0.002093404,0.0010538303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001559151,0.00007877737,0.0026523839,0.2634919,0.00074773474,0.00050023466,0.0031899028,0.0007818046,0.0002002927,0.010542975,0.06375803,0.65390015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025909416,0.00019307835,0.033550806,0.3344961,0.0013833921,0.0010381069,0.003769834,0.00036748944,0.00022522549,0.0051280814,0.61970586,0.00011612304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04225112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04420265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04225112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009247719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013960954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08401036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W133508776","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01672.x","title":"Assessing the impact of a wage subsidy for single parents on social assistance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Duration (music); Social assistance; Wage; Economics; Population; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Public assistance; Economic growth; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.2836521747668997,"score_gpt":0.2729596781066177,"score_spread":0.010692496660281992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W133508776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997294,0.00010248723,0.000119007855,0.00037160088,0.00001041774,0.00007096471,0.00024157642,0.000006847625,0.0017830362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991602,0.000035247675,0.000093893366,0.000046398876,0.0000056396925,0.000030277848,0.00007647584,8.2918706e-7,0.00055106106],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784243,0.0010670166,0.00003236252,0.00010848108,0.00034249004,0.00060725963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934063,0.002986093,0.0014904396,0.00015990777,0.00077030243,0.001186871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027607149,0.0002785656,0.00045062817,0.0004738216,0.000718218,0.0007374251,0.00084576505,0.00076922955,0.0038915498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008598223,0.00012380886,0.00041992503,0.0005336676,0.0004780657,0.00030205393,0.0006712935,0.0007798144,0.00019873751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009775878,0.010602814,0.7802295,0.0004363177,0.000673559,0.0009391597,0.001403499,0.049076922,0.0037746397,0.0031263109,0.006724099,0.13323717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039624918,0.0056680557,0.9764841,0.00007623694,0.00019555108,0.000032960623,0.0017395221,0.01198107,0.0008029332,0.00031991763,0.0022849052,0.000018380462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46102783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55552167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99195176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008048245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008864486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9166887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480148185","doi":"","title":"Reclaiming the Future: Women's Strategies for the 21st Century","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.021903152813236623,"score_gpt":0.2652446199881118,"score_spread":0.24334146717487515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480148185","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034578115,0.049026478,0.0009529276,0.58498627,0.004108633,0.000064845626,0.00017131993,0.00009105816,0.3260204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72515714,0.024610251,0.0012467435,0.060467444,0.001174695,0.00010808291,0.00011004986,0.00013789872,0.18698771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99316263,0.0017817004,0.00009307112,0.0003844619,0.0014243304,0.0031538715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99442434,0.0013662311,0.0002716149,0.00020354912,0.0015723244,0.002161845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008911864,0.0008502695,0.0008489503,0.0031561523,0.054235503,0.02032966,0.002853549,0.008115496,0.014215375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009837781,0.0003437359,0.0005095048,0.0037383938,0.065283276,0.008735085,0.009148082,0.0091626765,0.00094069866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043536296,0.000022685912,0.000982898,0.00013409203,0.000006972526,0.0001898552,0.21269335,0.00008872422,0.00017683223,0.65716857,0.10225029,0.02624226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010254257,0.000009070889,0.0018094496,0.00028106658,0.0000079121255,0.00005809582,0.17656429,0.00004072132,0.00010226292,0.032832444,0.78825176,0.000032739103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9445064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9734342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11640918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11640918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22955376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8446117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480681192","doi":"","title":"The Welfare Enigma: Explaining the Dramatic Decline in Canadians' Use of Social Assistance, 1993-2005","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"C.D. Howe Institute Commentary","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Welfare dependency; Social Welfare; Dependency (UML); Demographic economics; Economics; Drop out; Development economics; Public economics; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.03887215230271352,"score_gpt":0.27737503746906894,"score_spread":0.23850288516635543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480681192","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002969683,0.008353915,0.00015633929,0.98014325,0.0036201663,0.000007983822,0.0005664599,0.000017815666,0.004164462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16124743,0.020391729,0.0007182417,0.7913283,0.014329177,0.000046730504,0.00054398185,0.0001136658,0.011280691],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965719,0.0004911219,0.00011934001,0.0005317211,0.0011427979,0.0011430769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833318,0.0073168585,0.0011216818,0.00027475363,0.006689825,0.0012649447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008100581,0.0009816955,0.0010292728,0.0020437469,0.019293126,0.0067065055,0.0057412274,0.018029066,0.005407985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02815338,0.00044913858,0.0010460832,0.0043155444,0.011615485,0.0035512233,0.0024793586,0.015551106,0.00056384725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085965126,0.000017144004,0.007579266,0.00031468857,0.000083469386,0.00043161618,0.008336442,0.00045769388,0.00008482937,0.049978383,0.91452366,0.018106919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009941392,0.000037453734,0.042301778,0.003073115,0.00033982817,0.0002561376,0.04512885,0.002055695,0.00053957995,0.02878918,0.87701297,0.00036607916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9880332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092192285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.092192285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16338752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66890496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480831129","doi":"10.7202/010171ar","title":"Le bien-être économique des enfants au Canada : changements et conséquences pour les politiques sociales","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03379199833743781,"score_gpt":0.27123026161404157,"score_spread":0.23743826327660375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480831129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48171887,0.051221725,0.0021369937,0.31235483,0.00087868934,0.00012782823,0.0029274034,0.0001227768,0.14851087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9322254,0.018649125,0.0015698489,0.006355575,0.000108561086,0.000040502724,0.000250692,0.000023794752,0.040776428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843866,0.00020502966,0.000023183891,0.00008798576,0.0004427133,0.00080237765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998514,0.00017577806,0.00013813184,0.000020837992,0.00053625926,0.0006150694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012593302,0.00032925626,0.00025092493,0.00162972,0.009791853,0.0037572677,0.0008396839,0.0011480728,0.007553037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027377517,0.00017798325,0.00029286672,0.0026188476,0.0044659264,0.0014738911,0.0015317133,0.0015662981,0.00019634509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017223085,0.00008682954,0.16679394,0.0006397407,0.000080562706,0.0018895746,0.060143203,0.0015230407,0.0017596184,0.44656232,0.12174735,0.19860168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018729637,0.00004961163,0.3935108,0.0008086273,0.000048781447,0.00036517117,0.05463326,0.0010843936,0.00055278913,0.011786702,0.5370353,0.000105929226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11171768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11171768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19065173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81057227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481206788","doi":"10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.11.004","title":"Suicide and property rights in India","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Development Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Wife; Property (philosophy); Domestic violence; Demographic economics; State (computer science); Political science; Suicide prevention; Socioeconomics; Poison control; Economics; Medicine; Law; Environmental health","score_opus":0.016746114239978793,"score_gpt":0.23845402948505123,"score_spread":0.22170791524507244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481206788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98966265,0.0007452667,0.000036998834,0.0035554226,0.000016389644,0.0000042048314,0.00010887772,0.000001953598,0.005868311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992587,0.00021669391,0.000005273237,0.00004937582,0.0000064879005,0.0000010414464,0.000014907513,4.0659543e-7,0.0004471531],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990103,0.00025370138,0.000050503528,0.000041846422,0.000078335615,0.000565242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961169,0.0014084595,0.0011723636,0.00013299649,0.00028252508,0.0008867849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052985083,0.00009780555,0.00023038696,0.0014631065,0.001943186,0.0017292531,0.00082386367,0.0008783629,0.0058081686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029353634,0.00015658588,0.0003528585,0.0024502291,0.003239789,0.0011082496,0.0020466752,0.0018733499,0.00022117227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002561087,0.0005633537,0.90747315,0.0000805347,0.00009198246,0.0030003411,0.019142251,0.0006647736,0.00019414944,0.049436018,0.002190031,0.016907463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024047482,0.00014409116,0.9120049,0.000121856894,0.00005984245,0.0010345116,0.07135632,0.0006643133,0.0001529965,0.009097995,0.005305005,0.000034243516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10336342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16104126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10336342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030622839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036233875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20552355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481417842","doi":"10.1007/978-90-481-3377-2_18","title":"Canadian Policies for Families with Very Young Children in International Perspective","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Welfare; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.011166464028316635,"score_gpt":0.2526897775507035,"score_spread":0.24152331352238685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481417842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03104837,0.030159757,0.00086263864,0.19380412,0.0025685602,0.00008894132,0.0011149407,0.00011083958,0.7402419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4633605,0.046469033,0.004306031,0.037722975,0.0007497846,0.00017924162,0.00076598645,0.00017509799,0.44627136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970016,0.0002647401,0.0000475878,0.00013196425,0.0007945078,0.0017596091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969291,0.00028090793,0.00008499661,0.00006627881,0.0012385164,0.0014002998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018758354,0.0006029512,0.00043931662,0.0021002546,0.019918216,0.006172592,0.0016662253,0.0030693978,0.015209819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046256455,0.00034488295,0.00056581874,0.0038998818,0.0034869171,0.0017326551,0.0022464157,0.0047159917,0.00055931363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028651428,0.00004328238,0.003459178,0.00011888446,0.000016851549,0.00039742794,0.012577797,0.00070252264,0.00022496263,0.5669593,0.3638604,0.051610768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009757271,0.000009155641,0.007423136,0.00039688894,0.000022131197,0.000089706,0.0121957585,0.00012857969,0.00012844597,0.009618013,0.9699386,0.000039817653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99544597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99793905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14323387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14323387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32351533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99372727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482650144","doi":"","title":"Using a Canadian-American Natural Experiment to Study Relative Efficiencies of Social Welfare Payment Systems","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de recherche","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Payment; Economics; Natural experiment; Distribution (mathematics); Social Welfare; Demographic economics; Deadweight loss; Transfer payment; Labour economics; Public economics; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.16662525086489582,"score_gpt":0.3857543862809064,"score_spread":0.2191291354160106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482650144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854512,0.00013183936,0.0026208442,0.00046075656,0.00007727284,0.0010768618,0.0009426723,0.000056005447,0.009182555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781677,0.00024463484,0.008624926,0.0006026944,0.000036829206,0.0015670708,0.0008037095,0.000031674754,0.009920807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598783,0.0020400335,0.00007770805,0.00065986294,0.00076084386,0.00047376615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887045,0.0059201005,0.0016860864,0.0014744969,0.0012964873,0.0009182641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064378064,0.0008060533,0.00095520436,0.00079973944,0.0034437894,0.001279486,0.0012430768,0.0011721016,0.0054366426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012751274,0.00038381576,0.0006071762,0.0012220918,0.002804188,0.000774127,0.00070588,0.0011803416,0.00037213977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.075810105,0.09075695,0.42523623,0.0019368312,0.002679838,0.0013248525,0.019350579,0.038326122,0.08061999,0.09604008,0.039385013,0.12853342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019128965,0.040432725,0.71545136,0.00014930664,0.00113131,0.00031844762,0.009269154,0.093021445,0.013989826,0.030618947,0.07564332,0.00084514957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8010472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8640468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1989528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01872292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016026651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4002489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483962534","doi":"10.7202/039576ar","title":"Trev Lynn Broughton and Helen Rogers, eds. Gender and Fatherhood in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. ISBN:1-4039-9515-X. Price: US$28.95 (paperback), $84.00 (hardcover)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Art history; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.01828317795036184,"score_gpt":0.24724792509993399,"score_spread":0.22896474714957216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483962534","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004327579,0.95488465,0.00044506328,0.011752137,0.0026427486,0.000010946671,0.00019871499,0.00003412599,0.02959889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008066508,0.8362934,0.000991976,0.0025853536,0.0014940186,0.000047152032,0.00022740068,0.000100546014,0.15019366],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914396,0.00025990268,0.00006765162,0.00013920479,0.00030272608,0.00008648939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878854,0.00058133906,0.00015473578,0.00004997055,0.00026889268,0.00015659635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013998323,0.0016575877,0.0012418985,0.002106168,0.0016641516,0.0033122825,0.0015865844,0.0026798346,0.052826904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022325378,0.001136346,0.00050510356,0.0035320309,0.0017541561,0.006645657,0.0017009508,0.0032378368,0.016961498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075840166,0.000027791557,0.00029862847,0.001040991,0.000014813022,0.00014232461,0.0025482792,0.00011521841,0.00018758132,0.009323956,0.84234697,0.1438776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008606519,0.000012124851,0.0008574262,0.0017572325,0.000010586483,0.0001757902,0.0014558503,0.000027121405,0.00007131011,0.0048524276,0.99075806,0.000013529268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0400536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08818508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052826904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038884603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040953914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1767236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484340775","doi":"10.21991/c91958","title":"ITS ALL IN THE FAMILY: CHILD SUPPORT, TAX AND THIBAUDEAU","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.051600167727814034,"score_gpt":0.2809020562185577,"score_spread":0.22930188849074365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484340775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5337789,0.03921802,0.00022044955,0.25723645,0.00068626687,0.000040066585,0.00015260333,0.0000063579564,0.1686608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819666,0.006735547,0.00004818668,0.0039933254,0.000094874944,0.00002502559,0.000013381215,0.0000034009638,0.0071196733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988066,0.00047873944,0.000020726966,0.000056361834,0.00011647833,0.0005211631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838626,0.0008078795,0.0001519543,0.000049756538,0.0001250729,0.00047904113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018335956,0.00015743432,0.00034304336,0.00096973253,0.010037466,0.00567674,0.0008386352,0.0022708424,0.0061994884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036753856,0.00017716055,0.00018378528,0.0023514973,0.0073446794,0.003001732,0.0040583257,0.0042214612,0.00011260747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001040683,0.0002143089,0.031678863,0.00014414595,0.000032835167,0.0008581157,0.1539072,0.00017651297,0.00023860393,0.75305676,0.025772847,0.033815816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006554484,0.00008904962,0.11491496,0.0013689154,0.000074800104,0.000581533,0.5000733,0.00037397325,0.00032556572,0.10094599,0.28111532,0.00007092468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2151344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40783507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2151344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00947716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011665704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4277643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487664645","doi":"10.1177/0891243215584761","title":"Gay Pay for Straight Work","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gender & Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Occupational segregation; Demographic economics; Wage; Public sector; Psychology; Labour economics; Gender studies; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.090603080160753,"score_gpt":0.3236893382089471,"score_spread":0.23308625804819408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487664645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48821577,0.0018024422,0.0007695779,0.011312862,0.0009528447,0.00011904222,0.0023599432,0.00011692101,0.4943506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82651705,0.0009055571,0.0004464975,0.0017805352,0.000287829,0.000051262225,0.00087553426,0.000019194775,0.16911663],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919266,0.00014036083,0.00002221943,0.000042724398,0.00024782048,0.0003540915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979267,0.00024392178,0.00025784905,0.00016148773,0.00021532593,0.0011947473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076039555,0.00025566493,0.0003226284,0.0012619651,0.0027065936,0.0020079424,0.00037969736,0.0007370074,0.11261568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032501253,0.00014589443,0.00028323886,0.0008559896,0.00038456637,0.0005971148,0.001857783,0.0010878972,0.010225724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003153134,0.00143917,0.46395156,0.00023639295,0.00007960398,0.0011689567,0.006999398,0.00029028926,0.0010848315,0.08737745,0.1190791,0.31797785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009514951,0.0003781029,0.6191581,0.0004787556,0.00005025171,0.0016831526,0.024438458,0.00058810186,0.0004573039,0.015727257,0.33690923,0.000036137833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011208515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039262645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11261568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083953515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018342154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37673694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488095202","doi":"10.1177/001979390806100308","title":"Are Two Carrots Better Than One? The Effects of Adding Employment Services to Financial Incentive Programs for Welfare Recipients","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Labor Relations Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Earnings; Incentive; Welfare; Poverty; Business; Labour economics; Wage; Social Welfare; Demographic economics; Economics; Finance; Economic growth; Accounting","score_opus":0.05366364504482288,"score_gpt":0.307418284774684,"score_spread":0.2537546397298611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488095202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8953698,0.031813506,0.0013721056,0.03549576,0.0018575799,0.0012654746,0.00038977969,0.000066450644,0.03236952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644366,0.014044832,0.0041665044,0.009332336,0.00038288816,0.0007217748,0.000097893855,0.000024612822,0.0067926506],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922007,0.0057733366,0.0002065834,0.00043449353,0.00086803,0.00051680167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98992187,0.0065234816,0.0014628832,0.0004405196,0.0006724024,0.0009789268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01032941,0.00044253687,0.0011086446,0.0005817151,0.0016726474,0.0015834739,0.0014700111,0.0022923367,0.01063587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022985432,0.00035239191,0.0011441148,0.0008407155,0.0022072133,0.0022274347,0.0012751076,0.001628372,0.00056515203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08715863,0.021759572,0.037530378,0.008839614,0.0038366949,0.0006321516,0.010567185,0.0013098409,0.008022712,0.038869552,0.013661754,0.767812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06284357,0.18223041,0.3042065,0.015682045,0.019373395,0.0007068439,0.06815733,0.002569572,0.015959455,0.07612572,0.25136855,0.00077661645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026163813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04682255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026163813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002501403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005548838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054627776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488139815","doi":"","title":"Mariage, maternite et remuneration: le choix du moment importe-t-il?","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Remuneration; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.039560042869681816,"score_gpt":0.313348532875528,"score_spread":0.27378849000584615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488139815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8527835,0.06271293,0.00064950186,0.035271183,0.000521933,0.00003264608,0.00027374038,0.000020907662,0.047733635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97871757,0.013014337,0.00034460315,0.0009797824,0.00009438425,0.000024632127,0.000054488894,0.000010224578,0.0067599155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987203,0.0005811996,0.00004731772,0.00012216705,0.00019459709,0.00033457577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751925,0.0010670855,0.00062448246,0.00011212713,0.00020056343,0.00047644507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021279864,0.00029179733,0.00042786796,0.00086305337,0.0021067685,0.002981437,0.0007593445,0.0010726833,0.008281927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010599389,0.00029612926,0.0003789891,0.0013846938,0.002935729,0.0018882835,0.0024721867,0.0014632843,0.00055369036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001035246,0.00018116592,0.46704513,0.0020505171,0.00041001991,0.0034978355,0.2664505,0.00031231335,0.0018143599,0.06207596,0.0086374255,0.18648958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022047194,0.00022508329,0.7089008,0.0025819934,0.00017978092,0.0013903402,0.18525603,0.00009919729,0.0005589304,0.007773591,0.09291766,0.00009461275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041044235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0849618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041044235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026864556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049767955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08161068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489467266","doi":"","title":"Provisioning: Thinking About All of Women's Work","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Provisioning; Work (physics); Psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Telecommunications; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.022650764012371476,"score_gpt":0.2737781169090432,"score_spread":0.2511273528966717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489467266","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0916887,0.039244067,0.00654726,0.6309447,0.0044114967,0.000062110405,0.0002922532,0.000121161625,0.2266883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9002933,0.017002871,0.0028339208,0.034547567,0.0008180078,0.00005566204,0.0000950676,0.0001246474,0.044229064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964761,0.0010941596,0.00004675268,0.00024112637,0.0006603294,0.0014814289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965663,0.0007000637,0.00022872096,0.00023335,0.0009583604,0.0013132518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004937751,0.0010921167,0.00071593793,0.0021623108,0.03423629,0.011596034,0.003165323,0.004490437,0.0066771903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006302629,0.0005827503,0.00045195167,0.0033068717,0.053984497,0.01294554,0.0048310077,0.006975059,0.00053026585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006874163,0.000036168265,0.009662576,0.0002444796,0.000024317707,0.00041073878,0.3927177,0.00042001886,0.0006738059,0.46033856,0.08070377,0.054699037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007896372,0.000017362552,0.011715431,0.0007611319,0.000027805887,0.00017836146,0.49962905,0.00015301716,0.00017158841,0.11925432,0.36803198,0.000052081476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92669916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.959636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92669916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052672178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.101777695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3821652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489527438","doi":"10.1007/bf03405206","title":"Economic Gains of a Home Fortification Program","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Public Health","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Toronto; SickKids Foundation; Ministry of Health and Long Term Care; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Fortification; Business; Food science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.06605119123471774,"score_gpt":0.33189645512671756,"score_spread":0.2658452638919998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489527438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775963,0.00037905245,0.00016040642,0.0042304606,0.00013556717,0.00016244681,0.0006948937,0.000030239376,0.016610702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953349,0.00018377275,0.00013072041,0.00027279128,0.00004529902,0.000039037463,0.00017599936,0.0000023743526,0.0038150514],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926275,0.00024219601,0.000018384273,0.00003660053,0.00009447411,0.00034559946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867404,0.00030031204,0.00013077812,0.00006284924,0.00014551502,0.00068656274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083229557,0.0003087646,0.00032320345,0.0008413663,0.0012268831,0.0008025445,0.0008148918,0.001411793,0.01127549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032591145,0.00014912829,0.0006482327,0.00065271696,0.0006671406,0.0006067045,0.0012404786,0.0008601815,0.00034308323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07268359,0.07289771,0.22386105,0.0005238068,0.00061845314,0.0039543854,0.0015092341,0.011464212,0.004074436,0.02588001,0.023300918,0.5592321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00779379,0.019801628,0.9122194,0.00028658204,0.001190047,0.0006868173,0.009934973,0.008683616,0.0029826104,0.0068195616,0.029489085,0.0001119711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061941035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11616452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061941035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033045402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055196267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12316096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490141975","doi":"","title":"Pacifying Monogamy: The Mystery Revisited ∗","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2008 Meeting Papers","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ruler; Polygyny; Economic shortage; Wife; Subject (documents); Population; Phenomenon; Sociology; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Demography; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023267527370269832,"score_gpt":0.2816657951640924,"score_spread":0.2583982677938226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490141975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22208896,0.015812049,0.0820135,0.30826607,0.0018647223,0.0000782643,0.00031945205,0.00029594626,0.36926106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96382284,0.0038262352,0.0048498632,0.009883332,0.0008726283,0.000043808424,0.000037431688,0.000054997985,0.016608922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906784,0.00034091834,0.000029550694,0.0002884542,0.00015258565,0.00012065097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795246,0.0010190652,0.00021525283,0.00036912828,0.00021831815,0.000225755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024586632,0.0002519452,0.00078352913,0.0003554574,0.002205199,0.0032991625,0.0015250506,0.004164312,0.015883634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074804425,0.0002313147,0.00032346023,0.0005103413,0.015899206,0.0055908635,0.0023229602,0.003078333,0.0014790674],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024004441,0.000011477238,0.0014040618,0.000042848325,0.000010445252,0.00019943119,0.000616533,0.00047793487,0.0002768672,0.97366375,0.004569891,0.018702704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013541619,0.000030146632,0.0017735615,0.00005931813,0.0000070346186,0.00044271644,0.0013089587,0.00233021,0.00015661308,0.96140075,0.03245825,0.000018795532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002306683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002899225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015883634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095812476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010822559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05313599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490256597","doi":"10.2307/20460675","title":"Differences That Matter: Social Policy and the Working Poor in the United States and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Social policy; Political science; Political economy; Social science; Demographic economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.030653945032085635,"score_gpt":0.2702010851044494,"score_spread":0.23954714007236377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490256597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8873106,0.011069929,0.00011329581,0.06872833,0.00019178941,0.000056086134,0.0028761544,0.000015106671,0.029638756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890267,0.0035137194,0.00005984464,0.002611939,0.000034837198,0.00002043289,0.00033454827,0.000012549479,0.0043854946],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946478,0.0003977124,0.00011120779,0.0001820196,0.0007325847,0.003928713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932857,0.0007753216,0.00062665896,0.00012348322,0.0015822322,0.0036066703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022922766,0.00023219638,0.00081518886,0.0034813457,0.018386865,0.005798927,0.0016489963,0.0025021096,0.0055355188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007305239,0.00029187635,0.0005478656,0.008397172,0.006875822,0.0016675767,0.0032956584,0.0028311927,0.00020780541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005010465,0.00027408986,0.69795847,0.00035182494,0.00024588173,0.000993752,0.08231141,0.0018634235,0.00030800563,0.07939687,0.06413273,0.07166245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045335244,0.00004696874,0.7739511,0.0007482446,0.00011261703,0.000116954536,0.163215,0.00068651384,0.00019150467,0.0054471293,0.055312667,0.00012588968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0899713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0899713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18202531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6527905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490724436","doi":"","title":"Legislation canadienne de l'ecole obligatoire et incidence sur les annees de scolarite et le futur revenu du travail","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028192545075747814,"score_gpt":0.2945848562885913,"score_spread":0.2663923112128435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490724436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8237301,0.008106808,0.0023077624,0.015138993,0.00023832642,0.0001920977,0.0042824997,0.000120238496,0.14588313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584213,0.0029051292,0.0009929057,0.0012505027,0.00008179084,0.00012375433,0.00078309997,0.000026465566,0.035415012],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956156,0.0008180666,0.00013995121,0.0004497479,0.0016081526,0.0013684159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98367774,0.0047845664,0.0037604698,0.0007223311,0.004010806,0.0030441075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040598423,0.00025310618,0.0004947541,0.0018773084,0.0026649185,0.002263466,0.000830045,0.0010615658,0.015091655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014094287,0.00021648481,0.0006000772,0.0024280755,0.0024942814,0.0008180903,0.0019448791,0.0015243203,0.0008333518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076167745,0.0005542106,0.7182903,0.0005773768,0.00035280304,0.0003980019,0.01200597,0.0022497596,0.0039892457,0.08378427,0.019040821,0.1579955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019992738,0.00016040039,0.94795144,0.00025982026,0.00007530897,0.00006169736,0.0022022887,0.00026343382,0.0006793565,0.0012481938,0.04703689,0.00004126839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6238638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85171443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37613618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011294728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020404827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75670266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491322948","doi":"","title":"The Québec's Experiment of $5 per Day per Child Childcare Policy and Mother's Labour Supply: Evidence Based on the Five Cycles of the NLSCY","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Demographic economics; Child care; Christian ministry; Labour supply; Government (linguistics); Day care; Economics; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Geography; Socioeconomics; Demography; Labour economics; Sociology; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.027623041985969817,"score_gpt":0.3302874035049791,"score_spread":0.3026643615190093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491322948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9475496,0.017285962,0.0005399535,0.006408686,0.0002142955,0.00078948104,0.011669994,0.00005019963,0.015491941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849422,0.005083526,0.00041843927,0.0022419456,0.00008672335,0.0002865116,0.0020873754,0.000011822364,0.004841371],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908659,0.0048668697,0.00034203893,0.0008480041,0.0017215824,0.0013555933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97311056,0.011023073,0.0071879094,0.0014648761,0.0040698634,0.0031436933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008989829,0.00063259795,0.0007899247,0.0009054875,0.002701829,0.0017739183,0.0027539833,0.0016528663,0.0059897876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015836159,0.00041885258,0.001469981,0.0025626314,0.002061103,0.0009249776,0.0009910109,0.0014479257,0.00039757375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009601376,0.0036722568,0.88442713,0.0014925958,0.0028363604,0.00014628284,0.002276484,0.0020534922,0.00038204528,0.0037306962,0.019296795,0.070084535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010877462,0.0019654313,0.9851945,0.0005793009,0.00090372417,0.000021014841,0.0011534225,0.0010567687,0.00016200362,0.00021536626,0.0076087713,0.000052040712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99039054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99166167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04474237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04474237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04369838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32463014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491758970","doi":"10.4324/9780203884034-18","title":"Women’s Migration, Social Reproduction and Care","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reproduction; Social reproduction; Sociology; Biology; Ecology; Social science; Social capital","score_opus":0.021978655358192607,"score_gpt":0.2559631468116842,"score_spread":0.2339844914534916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491758970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030201823,0.119269185,0.0008334949,0.030342672,0.0015607037,0.000042369942,0.00004395851,0.000018449591,0.8176873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56285995,0.114121154,0.0013744627,0.0066561657,0.0011885411,0.00010817235,0.00006616973,0.000024779689,0.31360066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996836,0.00014664911,0.000008146018,0.00003506676,0.000056850186,0.00006972781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999081,0.000040222934,0.000012544758,0.000005950869,0.000012310383,0.000020965366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049229496,0.0002632805,0.00017271264,0.00039750632,0.0019286145,0.0022825913,0.000379179,0.0007359479,0.005529291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005247789,0.000077054276,0.000117288735,0.00082114135,0.00595699,0.0013404436,0.001409506,0.0009358316,0.00052171113],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001730698,0.000034555662,0.0010992051,0.00017410105,0.0000047439166,0.00034974664,0.05788378,0.00014219,0.00019444115,0.7602193,0.05692652,0.12295412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052234077,0.000030977182,0.0023651416,0.00044531928,0.0000026642579,0.00034323684,0.019465055,0.000057785637,0.00011329794,0.06366796,0.91349685,0.000006465395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078057814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015163407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078057814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026833774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023440185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01946932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491775449","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.36.4.583","title":"Post-Familial Families and the Domestic Division of Labour","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Demography; Census; Social class; Racial group; Argument (complex analysis); Marital status; Demographic economics; Sociology; Race (biology); Population; Economics; Medicine; Gender studies","score_opus":0.046359189706317264,"score_gpt":0.36834901590123675,"score_spread":0.3219898261949195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491775449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99102837,0.0007391384,0.00007700666,0.00039187196,0.0000088104325,0.0000020676953,0.000055357537,8.587314e-7,0.0076966286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991341,0.00019670633,0.000024415926,0.0000142251365,0.000005267036,0.0000016465316,0.000020929547,5.650385e-7,0.00060213],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960524,0.00012753127,0.000012607669,0.000035773257,0.000049905357,0.00016892815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987226,0.00023967566,0.00055808696,0.00008293458,0.00011661881,0.00027991278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005091046,0.00016084369,0.00014772714,0.00082603167,0.0012191737,0.0007499558,0.00028861413,0.00020485156,0.0042632986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025665895,0.00007507784,0.00016190573,0.0008802724,0.0009487121,0.00063460215,0.0010488613,0.00022269838,0.00020752642],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009350122,0.000075706375,0.93399906,0.000029143352,0.00003321084,0.0004892591,0.017472044,0.00021950179,0.00024792197,0.010774896,0.00081956654,0.035746146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004743223,0.00003267098,0.97596085,0.00006574034,0.000012485601,0.00033657142,0.014788031,0.00019894923,0.00007551809,0.0020792368,0.0064394157,0.0000057817438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056723475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010848064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000680845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053824842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492001302","doi":"10.5325/jafrideve.11.1.0061","title":"Gender Discrimination, Human Capital and Marriage","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Gender discrimination; Economics; Labour economics; Capital (architecture); Gender equality; Demographic economics; Sociology; Gender studies; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.02601670876028287,"score_gpt":0.2807724814340314,"score_spread":0.2547557726737485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492001302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89253414,0.0027823225,0.00089184433,0.003057206,0.000058660826,0.000017957413,0.00016892086,0.000006020919,0.10048298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982868,0.00025250137,0.000037480757,0.000052635263,0.000007626422,0.0000017963195,0.0000071724135,3.052408e-7,0.0013537122],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996761,0.00008820796,0.000006531711,0.000022164728,0.00004648091,0.00016056183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983765,0.0006424216,0.0005111492,0.000049862647,0.00007843703,0.00034163537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005338811,0.00013144828,0.00016449776,0.000585437,0.0010028272,0.0012221722,0.00019432949,0.00027194998,0.015839472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020177327,0.000033515444,0.000116229916,0.00087012234,0.0016299674,0.0005904768,0.0010329821,0.00035742504,0.0003534792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019933304,0.00040801137,0.5378935,0.00016002149,0.00004236154,0.0017385059,0.008168617,0.0018618407,0.0006108075,0.3616591,0.0039134216,0.08334449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031693835,0.00035775016,0.69486517,0.00046782885,0.00004377296,0.0014658401,0.030430408,0.0029952968,0.0009459807,0.21398641,0.05436856,0.00004138558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006601666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008176313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015839472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011268723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090815045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05298835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492385259","doi":"10.1787/880242325663","title":"Trends and Determinants of Fertility Rates","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"OECD social employment and migration working papers","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Università degli Studi di Torino; York University","keywords":"Fertility; Total fertility rate; Economics; Macro; Demographic economics; Developing country; Development economics; Demography; Economic growth; Population; Sociology; Family planning; Research methodology","score_opus":0.05432567056255388,"score_gpt":0.3451275265958075,"score_spread":0.2908018560332536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492385259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9293596,0.003678944,0.00085270824,0.002725722,0.000090989364,0.000027605754,0.03314338,0.00024355498,0.029877502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97955257,0.0019204419,0.00029346676,0.00010109108,0.000082137725,0.00002308068,0.01044947,0.00003700035,0.0075408625],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996532,0.00007270453,0.000028946766,0.00006297017,0.00006919272,0.00011286339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973551,0.0005968689,0.00097619504,0.00010688144,0.000750301,0.00021458183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007362875,0.000119959615,0.00014907938,0.002553974,0.00022110502,0.00085034524,0.0003044536,0.00024995953,0.009956808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042863516,0.00017585553,0.0004833157,0.0032789349,0.00021932722,0.0004662677,0.00035418675,0.00065268745,0.0020368758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009657459,0.000024709057,0.9634978,0.00007528758,0.00010023502,0.00007678304,0.00038268458,0.00084829325,0.00039828155,0.0053883097,0.010533633,0.018577423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005347952,0.000020060072,0.9930293,0.00002915499,0.000025442268,0.0000642544,0.00026056758,0.00052464195,0.00009532787,0.00023512743,0.0057043494,0.000006540149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06992379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057187274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06992379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044406977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065315946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13903356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492625916","doi":"10.7202/600613ar","title":"Nouvelles estimations du coût de l’enfant au Canada","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00998152525219329,"score_gpt":0.2219241647759104,"score_spread":0.2119426395237171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492625916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7415462,0.014276809,0.043354012,0.008656243,0.00021293675,0.0002317421,0.059681,0.000496337,0.13154474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9374973,0.0065184827,0.01862127,0.00022006688,0.000029460018,0.00010788014,0.008427366,0.00008692852,0.028491154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984909,0.0003538416,0.000049265665,0.0001789387,0.00065033813,0.00027660967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976222,0.0005643557,0.00017591291,0.00012464651,0.0013791928,0.0001337045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015472803,0.0005107669,0.0003922087,0.0029328733,0.0015484204,0.0015227007,0.0010405425,0.00042865096,0.007501842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076289563,0.0002755493,0.0009472295,0.005122261,0.0005714679,0.0008046282,0.00090807816,0.00094893685,0.0005031425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001992172,0.00006197477,0.5630397,0.0004123568,0.0004686523,0.0004292994,0.004588741,0.05868432,0.00060518197,0.14602599,0.040751986,0.18473253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003980505,0.000050329098,0.77765846,0.00052971713,0.00017160946,0.00028394346,0.005967434,0.06328828,0.0012045843,0.010072432,0.14057992,0.0001534413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99435544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03246141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03246141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021675214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23552507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494833518","doi":"10.5539/mas.v9n8p29","title":"The Nexus between Female Labour Force Participation (FLFP) and Fertility rate in Selected ASEAN Countries: Panel Cointegration Approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Nexus (standard); Fertility; Total fertility rate; Economics; Panel data; Granger causality; Demographic economics; Causality (physics); Estimation; Labour economics; Econometrics; Demography; Population; Sociology; Research methodology","score_opus":0.06978057098355432,"score_gpt":0.3071877364510844,"score_spread":0.23740716546753005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494833518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995652,0.0005214435,0.0010179637,0.00014337496,0.000004696656,0.0000059919926,0.000982884,0.0000072430958,0.0016642822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801195,0.000274333,0.00024408875,0.000010663128,0.0000051888596,0.000008263835,0.0008931274,9.511558e-7,0.0005513098],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967945,0.00016270186,0.00002677045,0.000050329003,0.00003263273,0.00004803838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910384,0.00045811426,0.00025219016,0.000050215956,0.000095452764,0.000040211824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008111332,0.0001732776,0.00020087944,0.0010297823,0.0002348508,0.0005646971,0.000195252,0.00021407056,0.0022039404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012895825,0.000098356606,0.00043968865,0.0015132409,0.0001956398,0.00039291955,0.0003896622,0.00034261745,0.00018432774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059258662,0.000042252792,0.9765679,0.00004311538,0.00024362454,0.00040544057,0.0004826302,0.005761544,0.0004332144,0.0014969497,0.00051756337,0.0139464745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025114205,0.00006894081,0.9864841,0.000034393783,0.00009889461,0.00012229652,0.0012044074,0.008954059,0.00043495916,0.00039473866,0.0021895936,0.0000111268855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020303939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028972773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020303939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034922347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046983044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040371478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495085825","doi":"10.1007/s00181-014-0880-0","title":"Taxes, wages and working hours","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Empirical Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security","funders":"Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Ragnar Söderbergs stiftelse","keywords":"Economics; Taxable income; Endogeneity; Econometrics; Hourly wage; Microsimulation; Wage; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Panel data; Tax rate; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Percentage point; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.04340689920841022,"score_gpt":0.2964219595051713,"score_spread":0.2530150602967611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495085825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94360447,0.017299438,0.002410917,0.008706812,0.0001762915,0.000025040965,0.001317313,0.00002491006,0.026434815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897636,0.0030494113,0.00022827396,0.00018599526,0.00011233836,0.000009534465,0.00017838864,0.000006088188,0.006466304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956065,0.0001951898,0.000021452017,0.000044280077,0.000064146836,0.00011425195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892051,0.0075532533,0.0017750968,0.0003202195,0.0003493893,0.00079691794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010894431,0.00026154742,0.0004076454,0.0011372388,0.00081771845,0.0021427302,0.0005058877,0.0009893092,0.012493812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0102268495,0.00019022569,0.00031969667,0.0021451907,0.0015311867,0.001749597,0.0005867791,0.0011214141,0.00056582683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011433689,0.0012647121,0.70623857,0.00040897648,0.0003352256,0.0005831907,0.0024402584,0.009177876,0.00035814205,0.20172976,0.009388934,0.06693089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016143065,0.00023412587,0.718908,0.00045838067,0.0002754166,0.00038670652,0.010093825,0.008595712,0.0004013717,0.24064647,0.019791318,0.000047314552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022941254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02600199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022941254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001457648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013878457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045615435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496375687","doi":"","title":"Current Issues Surrounding Poverty and Welfare Programming in Canada: Two Reviews","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"oURspace (University of Regina)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Welfare; Economics; Political science; Public economics; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.023375071894292093,"score_gpt":0.26130684937764287,"score_spread":0.2379317774833508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496375687","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005164351,0.98311317,0.000040869993,0.013091395,0.00057807815,0.000008089794,0.000058976344,0.0000042872066,0.0025887552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0042118053,0.9916401,0.000114580056,0.0029086354,0.00033409218,0.00001390885,0.00004849122,0.0000059962354,0.0007223273],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676454,0.00052339054,0.0002655535,0.00017751055,0.0017336761,0.00053538143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98231,0.0065147523,0.001331823,0.00020073375,0.008414306,0.0012284571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055264574,0.0007942697,0.0014768428,0.0058917417,0.0037649702,0.007153737,0.0015762788,0.002448272,0.00302754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011805464,0.0004820346,0.00073641376,0.017597027,0.003467252,0.001961582,0.0021367192,0.002750472,0.00040763395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015087321,0.00008495543,0.004526389,0.026909083,0.00018642229,0.0007037076,0.0074237585,0.0005016112,0.00031934836,0.012106407,0.23569742,0.71139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026520614,0.00007008554,0.01801937,0.029979018,0.00029023812,0.00043613327,0.0077138445,0.000065682354,0.00024161498,0.0019489969,0.9411186,0.00008986571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8968321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9596992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10316789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034338947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17007276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24914771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497925270","doi":"10.1920/wp.ifs.2006.0610","title":"The social cost-of-living: welfare foundations and estimation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Estimation; Welfare; Social Welfare; Economics; Sociology; Econometrics; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.049900943316743676,"score_gpt":0.37107770415019936,"score_spread":0.3211767608334557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497925270","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0130547695,0.0011000271,0.9717363,0.0023626657,0.00009400514,0.00007525326,0.0006537209,0.000072310395,0.010850958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6447207,0.004975737,0.33426502,0.00062227715,0.00073040806,0.0010432801,0.0016980973,0.00019390495,0.011750611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957665,0.0026175918,0.00012918719,0.00053361553,0.00071156776,0.00024163419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99120975,0.0055082194,0.0011218638,0.0011195414,0.00091168977,0.00012899484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055565373,0.00097613543,0.0011641856,0.002336864,0.0007579113,0.003424884,0.0019015988,0.0019392025,0.005217284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0260491,0.0005880718,0.0013070418,0.0034605018,0.0031873216,0.005288498,0.00261817,0.0036477577,0.0005477434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019686335,0.00005177733,0.003694111,0.00012278747,0.00007491816,0.00006683075,0.000127072,0.058047224,0.00014316672,0.8919317,0.004595123,0.041125532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061240407,0.000028802024,0.0023591446,0.00013480564,0.000020395686,0.00009010101,0.00008506895,0.22148053,0.00023240228,0.76511306,0.010411888,0.000037535017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006553412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002865071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006553412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026494674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015122477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029386163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499157329","doi":"","title":"Income Instability of Lone Parents, Singles and Two-Parent Families in Canada, 1984 to 2004","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Demographic economics; Government (linguistics); Instability; Economics; Labour economics; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.03777603521105575,"score_gpt":0.33082847993614706,"score_spread":0.2930524447250913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499157329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871715,0.0014841055,0.000061970444,0.00040950216,0.000018424776,0.000020647034,0.009282301,0.000011194787,0.0015403685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913017,0.0012203053,0.000106846725,0.0000804116,0.000008922675,0.000012719602,0.0052731745,0.0000046050172,0.0019911772],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993224,0.000030486734,0.00004117136,0.00007743387,0.0002244929,0.0003040452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996788,0.00009326185,0.00076560717,0.000059031372,0.0014261036,0.00086791517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051568256,0.00035235193,0.0005762604,0.0026539795,0.0037575478,0.0015413249,0.0012361241,0.00040176034,0.0014329514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025358687,0.0002743686,0.000547555,0.0057967636,0.00073679356,0.0005258507,0.0012501761,0.0010387102,0.0002150394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011474214,0.00003089813,0.98657113,0.00003082249,0.0000460567,0.00012099391,0.0017029177,0.00017944316,0.000055041754,0.00014297794,0.0018950292,0.0091099525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002453041,0.0000081454455,0.9971378,0.000017607643,0.000009421115,0.000042510746,0.0013575576,0.00013448764,0.000043574888,0.000015762902,0.0012235526,0.0000071988197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99717367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99822587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03980665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03980665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028567724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28881878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499528913","doi":"","title":"The Mom Effect: Family Proximity and the Labour Force Status of Women in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Demographic economics; Child care; Parental leave; Work (physics); Labour economics; Daughter; Psychology; Demography; Economics; Medicine; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.020502317162143912,"score_gpt":0.2834209535353818,"score_spread":0.2629186363732379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499528913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818227,0.002405727,0.00019116733,0.0014365738,0.000034956785,0.000027045606,0.002948032,0.000013406599,0.011120304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99563885,0.00066533714,0.00010351671,0.000079714846,0.000008112549,0.000007808268,0.00056946033,0.0000054491366,0.0029218104],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990676,0.00008421259,0.000027447772,0.00013384767,0.00024392272,0.0004430619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984213,0.00020193179,0.00036407812,0.000065354965,0.00040864604,0.00053877884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059471204,0.00028395237,0.000525402,0.0015594206,0.0039655403,0.001654191,0.0010613282,0.00042387185,0.0070188176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003535031,0.00016901626,0.00053671666,0.0038339766,0.0010607713,0.0005176495,0.0017737293,0.00057817524,0.00033928192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001348994,0.000028285132,0.97742486,0.00005127455,0.00007243984,0.00029662857,0.0037816968,0.00028025502,0.00015545583,0.0012293605,0.0022539052,0.014290818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072156868,0.000018514715,0.9896554,0.00005988422,0.00002740024,0.000060923976,0.006425822,0.00023607883,0.00005804925,0.00014933589,0.003289274,0.000012162447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99245256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99600405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016989434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016989434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018800234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12326753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501405069","doi":"","title":"Counting on Marilyn Waring: New Advances in Feminist Economics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women's Studies Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Unpaid work; Parliament; Breastfeeding; Sociology; Feminism; Work (physics); Social science; Law; Political science; Gender studies; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.02471871757066973,"score_gpt":0.2991038342628855,"score_spread":0.27438511669221577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501405069","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016252113,0.5166651,0.0125769805,0.22602932,0.008720465,0.00003520749,0.00019038147,0.00013359277,0.23402365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.077561826,0.6455818,0.015075534,0.02942801,0.027460966,0.00021895385,0.00019211316,0.00056312204,0.20391768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729747,0.0013313438,0.000082614846,0.00022986747,0.00089743146,0.000161213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924757,0.0060865385,0.00023498268,0.00034695797,0.00061132427,0.0002445296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00426324,0.00084158714,0.0008632652,0.003242229,0.0029334002,0.0055184467,0.00095217273,0.0027484205,0.016913326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006913568,0.0005643753,0.00036500965,0.005317645,0.013168114,0.009945438,0.002396911,0.0057010613,0.0025930665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010350894,0.00001662006,0.00014653151,0.00027911342,0.000006527605,0.00005521628,0.003214779,0.00023529821,0.00008006744,0.5840574,0.3032212,0.10867688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017565242,0.0000022722008,0.000223723,0.00043817086,0.0000012068109,0.000025012441,0.0007176146,0.00010313241,0.000038691698,0.105464414,0.89297354,0.000010480492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015855232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024934746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016913326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009971164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058575394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07234615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501465332","doi":"","title":"Impact, dans cinq provinces canadiennes, de l'introduction de la prestation nationale pour enfants (PNE) sur les revenus et la consommation de femmes monoparentales","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archipelago (Université du Québec à Montréal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.009992892631010818,"score_gpt":0.23504294267270034,"score_spread":0.22505005004168951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501465332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97056466,0.0045083235,0.0014527767,0.0026106029,0.00011917808,0.00017498758,0.0062782196,0.000055375138,0.014235884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984038,0.0025460704,0.0026607893,0.00046669057,0.000021438036,0.00018863556,0.0017078021,0.0000152957,0.008355292],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681216,0.0014352011,0.00008859532,0.00038101955,0.00047011694,0.0008128495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953241,0.0020688083,0.000712997,0.00021318083,0.0011107187,0.000570279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003128527,0.0004250823,0.0007868318,0.0011108504,0.00202191,0.0022551892,0.00096917886,0.0006513241,0.004139936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007628585,0.000410514,0.0011293563,0.0027680104,0.0013442469,0.0006642422,0.0019422411,0.001285576,0.00020955356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019890799,0.0005830577,0.8527962,0.0010325905,0.0012573249,0.0007717883,0.0071185315,0.019929156,0.0010325591,0.015853733,0.00648486,0.09115114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031213858,0.00043387344,0.96668106,0.0003236915,0.0005638199,0.00009812373,0.0074528074,0.005087028,0.00055296,0.0011400974,0.017297141,0.00005715816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9680778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97701854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03192222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02921377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033152323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21196175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501481305","doi":"10.1300/j134v05n04_03","title":"The TANF Co-Residence Requirement for Custodial Teen Parents","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Residence; Liberian dollar; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Economic Justice; Social policy; State (computer science); Political science; Public administration; Economic growth; Business; Law; Economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.04409334017973367,"score_gpt":0.3410455186425987,"score_spread":0.29695217846286504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501481305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95618486,0.00030954037,0.00058039936,0.0038047982,0.00017215002,0.00006777792,0.00054503616,0.00002998725,0.038305502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99559385,0.00016740242,0.0005664286,0.00045953272,0.000037985537,0.00007994001,0.00018932277,0.0000058301725,0.0028997452],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774855,0.0005171272,0.00015935338,0.00016270476,0.00066394085,0.00074825494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918344,0.0024885926,0.002214217,0.00032795878,0.0017791769,0.0013556501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025336035,0.0000658578,0.0001424544,0.0006990899,0.0020395205,0.0012793539,0.00048632929,0.00063929835,0.008342876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015364143,0.00014357235,0.00015882177,0.0003862272,0.0005840837,0.0007670752,0.0018720592,0.0006855665,0.00045107902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026513266,0.00042338594,0.72855407,0.00019047136,0.00002054718,0.0026257625,0.019467995,0.00043675335,0.003382112,0.099700585,0.03148873,0.113444544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040529427,0.00046609063,0.8229348,0.0005310406,0.000039936633,0.0038725324,0.043263417,0.00095093553,0.0040091374,0.0067628296,0.1170754,0.00005345631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022114573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046316072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022114573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011792358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004992703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043971717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503515412","doi":"10.7202/017749ar","title":"Changements dans la dynamique de la participation des hommes et des femmes au marché du travail au Canada*","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.02443256474536845,"score_gpt":0.2670469987193102,"score_spread":0.24261443397394175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503515412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99615866,0.00034761554,0.00013712197,0.0002922792,0.000005999617,0.000016756074,0.0005842962,0.000004550707,0.002452682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949995,0.00029234256,0.00025516303,0.00003934336,0.0000035143084,0.00002090132,0.0003104083,0.0000042969027,0.004074497],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908626,0.00010968723,0.000022066257,0.00014150183,0.00018487131,0.00045562402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783653,0.00032824115,0.000360599,0.00009686019,0.00073561067,0.00064221036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009670132,0.00026910508,0.00029793006,0.002106878,0.0040956032,0.0018020209,0.0010203837,0.0005687851,0.0056772707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022981195,0.00029804284,0.000370551,0.0035221698,0.0018017646,0.0006001936,0.0014414995,0.0006498601,0.00025619834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014067712,0.000038418326,0.90298295,0.000062622035,0.000052666193,0.00017646594,0.06364346,0.00026889323,0.0010729604,0.0013254235,0.00097452966,0.029260803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016803651,0.000014994881,0.97069,0.000032497483,0.0000074749546,0.000030103793,0.025762111,0.00011963943,0.00007293701,0.00006923434,0.0031866904,0.000012667036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98131114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99300003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018688858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017143438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02090239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12438494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507009459","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00082.x","title":"Comparing Public Social Provision and Citizenship in the United States, Canada, and Mexico: Are There Implications for a North American Space?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics &amp Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Parallels; Sanctions; Workforce; Welfare reform; Political science; Social policy; Social rights; Social citizenship; Welfare; Economic growth; Public administration; Sociology; Economics; Human rights; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06381027152122908,"score_gpt":0.33585486387122887,"score_spread":0.2720445923499998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507009459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9365503,0.0027946616,0.0001376809,0.01927898,0.00006518295,0.00004501805,0.0005555961,0.000010024778,0.04056246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949758,0.0010960698,0.000108068896,0.0010595734,0.000017879567,0.000037367136,0.00024044988,0.0000044686853,0.002460316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966426,0.00043657937,0.000060062855,0.00017880191,0.0006713797,0.0020105042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99453175,0.00092133344,0.0010027338,0.00017923313,0.0022085542,0.001156247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025630335,0.00016268878,0.0004036287,0.0024060293,0.0081563685,0.004021351,0.0008732254,0.00093267736,0.002219753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008400512,0.00016563067,0.00034404127,0.0052304193,0.004090416,0.0017797314,0.003001789,0.0019472565,0.000055298337],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055264286,0.0003155974,0.7614797,0.00022248123,0.00018964804,0.00034588817,0.058823336,0.0012904803,0.00034743172,0.09786321,0.018428203,0.06014134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031178188,0.00004881349,0.8624238,0.00017632192,0.00008598752,0.000032887827,0.09475092,0.00022568266,0.00028771043,0.0010155484,0.040882207,0.000039004342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99370885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106684744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.106684744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07153917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7740556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507403859","doi":"","title":"From household's to individual welfare: does the Lorenz criterion still hold? Theory and evidence from French data","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Welfare; Observer (physics); Private good; Public good; Distribution (mathematics); Point (geometry); Test (biology); Household income; Econometrics; Lorenz curve; Demographic economics; Public economics; Microeconomics; Inequality; Economic inequality; Mathematics; Geography; Gini coefficient","score_opus":0.0920397340854758,"score_gpt":0.3587910647084983,"score_spread":0.2667513306230225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507403859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8579109,0.003272397,0.090803966,0.0068050977,0.00006090243,0.00010617126,0.0013173298,0.00013846828,0.039584793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963282,0.00034571107,0.0021727597,0.00027350656,0.000043180167,0.0000308188,0.00025737024,0.00001871552,0.0005295527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99084467,0.005561307,0.00040468978,0.0015470382,0.00081046676,0.0008317636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9475834,0.03669437,0.005841906,0.0071507283,0.0021302605,0.0005994521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0121559845,0.00037977516,0.0016113957,0.0018902743,0.0013786528,0.0027459606,0.0012318406,0.0011860947,0.0076773562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060392532,0.00020697134,0.0012900536,0.002552302,0.005113622,0.0049344627,0.0023053205,0.0016982242,0.00058400386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075111754,0.00014206812,0.2109108,0.00056352926,0.0008914184,0.0007353102,0.0035856962,0.02064608,0.0005723708,0.594414,0.0074823676,0.15930523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017718998,0.00041829297,0.21702874,0.00024119955,0.00027648706,0.00069007254,0.0040715314,0.05845387,0.000970157,0.69956577,0.01796574,0.0001409233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014159247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053767897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014159247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002138141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006988744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06428772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509055411","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.692142","title":"Career Choice, Marriage-Timing, and the Attraction of Unequals","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Marriage market; Inequality; Fecundity; Differential (mechanical device); Representation (politics); Economics; Demographic economics; Sociology; Political science; Demography; Law","score_opus":0.020801294989156494,"score_gpt":0.2870895231707257,"score_spread":0.2662882281815692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509055411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98861796,0.00032913472,0.00014415834,0.00047858595,0.000009327124,0.000005746855,0.000035532077,0.0000020915809,0.010377446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993781,0.00005387354,0.00002102417,0.000017745404,0.0000060679554,0.0000014650603,0.000008978836,6.8724756e-7,0.0005120444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994073,0.00029902844,0.000019710596,0.000040268325,0.000058720016,0.00017503944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939628,0.002549891,0.0012583062,0.00020988956,0.00020425231,0.0018147816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020258732,0.00008472907,0.00027526414,0.001017393,0.001926289,0.0017642103,0.00037595685,0.0007485496,0.0163653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009226594,0.00012858464,0.00016543196,0.000716807,0.0011774348,0.00082408864,0.0016479879,0.00075784995,0.0003993979],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012460785,0.0007223051,0.9214759,0.000059043432,0.000044921904,0.00043247285,0.0068865772,0.0005133649,0.0009842328,0.035332527,0.0009216141,0.031380944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006441147,0.0002555212,0.95249856,0.000065864726,0.000027516844,0.00045306794,0.020614728,0.0013751254,0.00025716893,0.02025109,0.004111294,0.000025674608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034689596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073118857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0163653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005711812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049765635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054747343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510910963","doi":"","title":"THE INCENTIVE EFFECTS OF THE ONTARIO CHILD CARE SUPPLEMENT FOR WORKING FAMILIES ON HOUSEHOLD LABOUR SUPPLY DECISIONS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Census; Labour supply; Labour economics; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Child care; Estimation; Margin (machine learning); Child labour; Economics; Working hours; Substitution effect; Business; Medicine; Nursing; Environmental health; Engineering","score_opus":0.01253788155291845,"score_gpt":0.229979573530658,"score_spread":0.21744169197773955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510910963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792559,0.00058771117,0.00013614511,0.0018394513,0.000017285549,0.00004839099,0.00064312975,0.0000057156612,0.017466262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962496,0.0003831646,0.0002701911,0.00008158041,0.000010268484,0.000021992675,0.00015071752,0.0000018542777,0.0028307508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998123,0.00060596276,0.000058065838,0.00009903582,0.0007403924,0.0003734929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895075,0.005093856,0.0023232966,0.0004338509,0.0014340727,0.0012074998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030171187,0.00015538203,0.00035611104,0.00048635527,0.0012267464,0.0008264958,0.00059863745,0.000376509,0.0047084955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019157782,0.00014408788,0.00032706442,0.00077838864,0.00073194376,0.00035163888,0.0008546175,0.00032688328,0.00019665797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025040372,0.000696751,0.8200653,0.00021152513,0.00016721353,0.00027243872,0.0067556384,0.0030511294,0.0016870745,0.007938281,0.0070818667,0.14956875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006799347,0.00026262272,0.98494256,0.0000881616,0.00007833094,0.000031925145,0.0023458374,0.0008482296,0.0003487827,0.00041349742,0.01055737,0.000014620356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79022014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91673934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20977986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015657468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016843768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42203057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513953251","doi":"","title":"The Post-childbirth Employment of Canadian Mothers and the Earnings Trajectories of Their Continuously Employed Counterparts, 1983 to 2004","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Childbirth; Earnings; Demographic economics; Longitudinal data; Fixed effects model; Longitudinal study; Economics; Demography; Labour economics; Psychology; Medicine; Panel data; Pregnancy; Sociology; Econometrics; Accounting","score_opus":0.019432872737149824,"score_gpt":0.2784591058665424,"score_spread":0.25902623312939255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513953251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96031064,0.0010894894,0.00009788951,0.00046621624,0.00001856052,0.000035321245,0.033707447,0.00002857912,0.0042458544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687582,0.0018792361,0.00033014896,0.00008242358,0.000010037734,0.000031676667,0.021762853,0.0000090834665,0.0071363584],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995296,0.000017902194,0.000020589625,0.00005321041,0.0001835492,0.00019525131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809676,0.0000766416,0.000344942,0.000069124326,0.0011277953,0.00028470732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007124491,0.00034826444,0.00030832455,0.0024975343,0.0024356423,0.0010116368,0.0011102812,0.00030381454,0.0029880207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025596044,0.0002747623,0.00051984494,0.005018904,0.00034801866,0.00035978106,0.0006913175,0.0005386,0.0005347948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015414276,0.000035674613,0.97512484,0.000056807825,0.000056683628,0.00013606231,0.0020134028,0.00027538184,0.00023595194,0.00032139136,0.0041559217,0.017433815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041064786,0.000010432635,0.99546695,0.00002263933,0.00001022728,0.000026772419,0.0010235227,0.00016104913,0.000065270164,0.000013811233,0.0031866923,0.000008463767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99789727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022813536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022813536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026159063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16552454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514442006","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.51095","title":"Results of a Survey of Graduate Courses in Applied Welfare Economics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","keywords":"Welfare; Economics","score_opus":0.09538930266594495,"score_gpt":0.291144637914614,"score_spread":0.19575533524866903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514442006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905281,0.00021406934,0.00022726318,0.0005350909,0.000023737712,0.00008306059,0.004438893,0.000015134538,0.003934609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798645,0.00067164825,0.00040403815,0.0010128847,0.00006424899,0.00033666572,0.0057522557,0.000024877862,0.011868984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985776,0.00040448556,0.00014194717,0.00020570337,0.00035454927,0.00031579394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914351,0.0023659328,0.0014900933,0.000459936,0.002063799,0.002185078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022315884,0.00024092983,0.0004069832,0.0022058298,0.000584461,0.000694277,0.0002994844,0.0006984204,0.006084626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065718694,0.00020268447,0.00030590195,0.0024279994,0.0003383447,0.0005443941,0.0009047437,0.0005912472,0.0028456254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007890698,0.0003436423,0.9773681,0.000059917274,0.000017116794,0.00005183124,0.0032066181,0.00004411371,0.0005586911,0.00016558765,0.0049306923,0.013174822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037365346,0.000083865954,0.9938684,0.00001033518,0.0000032865046,0.000033024542,0.002456332,0.000035231365,0.00006925797,0.000024868634,0.0034088294,0.0000028805218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005054154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008041848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006084626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056086626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010804983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020355105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516117782","doi":"","title":"Marriage matching, risk sharing and spousal labor supplies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Marriage market; Matching (statistics); Bargaining power; Economics; Census; Power (physics); Microeconomics; Labour economics; Econometrics; Sociology; Statistics; Population; Mathematics; Demography","score_opus":0.029269044814231805,"score_gpt":0.32130282339610355,"score_spread":0.29203377858187174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516117782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92222863,0.00042500297,0.05988802,0.00090257335,0.000017679467,0.000048086884,0.00014671148,0.00003448838,0.016308771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965109,0.00011159518,0.0010212447,0.000025656685,0.000009306389,0.000012193196,0.000029292696,0.000002624517,0.0022773014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929047,0.0002984761,0.00003141541,0.000117639436,0.000120343066,0.00014158367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798125,0.00083794584,0.0007343876,0.00024589518,0.000061144914,0.00013944996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017241283,0.0002577527,0.00053612946,0.00052854687,0.00055249315,0.0012922401,0.0006383729,0.00069430156,0.009528199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086946,0.00023426423,0.00035083535,0.0006963392,0.0010286787,0.0014011774,0.001109167,0.00057835324,0.00052710023],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048866303,0.00054457976,0.18546811,0.00008723823,0.00021493957,0.0006687189,0.002980226,0.09532918,0.0017606623,0.5699941,0.0019352554,0.14052816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008224884,0.00025801946,0.08723626,0.000059018814,0.000088919216,0.00059855083,0.0017712476,0.17110416,0.00078646507,0.73276323,0.005203998,0.000047914047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019301267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014100852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009528199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007044855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050764676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031874955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516135016","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1818700","title":"Bundling of Services and Household Welfare in Developing Countries Using Panel Data: The Case of Peru","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Developing country; Panel data; Business; Economics; Economic growth; Econometrics; Market economy","score_opus":0.0438507272872049,"score_gpt":0.2920553910493763,"score_spread":0.24820466376217137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516135016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945205,0.00061850005,0.0008920929,0.0010330147,0.000004867882,0.000030044213,0.0009458152,0.000019237797,0.001936056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970216,0.00038229107,0.0006586689,0.00005697872,0.000009835848,0.0000364884,0.00092734786,0.000006161747,0.0009005088],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748623,0.0016061765,0.000094765775,0.00018419471,0.00012971896,0.0004988867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98742247,0.007271858,0.0030712695,0.000712266,0.0008037293,0.00071836705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032991737,0.00031708225,0.0010578084,0.0021012512,0.0016256131,0.0026214598,0.0011778392,0.0013754003,0.004941201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013915204,0.00073521194,0.0008566035,0.006859388,0.000979647,0.002423309,0.0029588086,0.0017172063,0.00029735654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000377509,0.00044020262,0.9465444,0.00009970591,0.00067852286,0.00082996755,0.0039202035,0.017167775,0.0002445344,0.012001926,0.0021913974,0.01550384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012104287,0.00040873094,0.88143426,0.00025939572,0.0008562626,0.00028196556,0.025123028,0.071083665,0.00045478408,0.013014409,0.0068734563,0.00008900594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20036079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24858116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20036079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030508006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019653777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3983891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516586681","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2011.01283.x","title":"BONNIEFOX, When Couples become Parents: The Creation of Gender in the Transition to Parenthood. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2010, 334 p., index.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Citation; Sociology; Media studies; Library science; Transition (genetics); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.049982898543453266,"score_gpt":0.2803688166279105,"score_spread":0.23038591808445724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516586681","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047364825,0.9389656,0.00040449676,0.04265976,0.0020939326,0.00001496135,0.00046902333,0.000037520185,0.014881003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027380552,0.9398944,0.0011375059,0.0071220645,0.0016577957,0.00007028226,0.00045989754,0.00010912045,0.022168435],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894017,0.0003611931,0.000071751405,0.00009088012,0.00034495175,0.00019092733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971228,0.0016078653,0.00022591952,0.00005168886,0.0005666972,0.00042485286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020665298,0.0021682417,0.0013201501,0.006624063,0.00795263,0.0055507906,0.002985434,0.0058123968,0.016702496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049815346,0.0013915071,0.00047803472,0.010679798,0.009593297,0.0125020975,0.002147654,0.005430831,0.0035693524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069636844,0.000016028162,0.001107931,0.0012654713,0.000016088577,0.00034363597,0.020582808,0.000103530954,0.0001059554,0.036559515,0.86804426,0.07178515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018386643,0.000012803168,0.0094698295,0.0031473981,0.000024128922,0.00038860788,0.015954407,0.00006770189,0.00013079797,0.025109097,0.9456303,0.000046658763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6099879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81317914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6099879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019599145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017299999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7846179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517293209","doi":"","title":"The Distribution of Welfare in Uganda","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eastern Africa social science research review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Distribution (mathematics); Inequality; Quarter (Canadian coin); Consumption (sociology); Economics; Survey data collection; Rural area; Social Welfare; Demographic economics; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Development economics; Geography; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10300190518189999,"score_gpt":0.4094122753210235,"score_spread":0.3064103701391235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517293209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9657222,0.009381494,0.00045199416,0.0013177851,0.000014276522,0.000022943004,0.0007534457,0.000013537807,0.0223222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955096,0.002683176,0.00011227965,0.00003957579,0.0000083361,0.000019804216,0.00015486097,0.0000035125474,0.0014688822],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984565,0.000591763,0.00006833606,0.00013309723,0.00024536796,0.00050503295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988519,0.00024012815,0.0004032442,0.0000514838,0.00033592855,0.00011732625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092900824,0.00018507216,0.00040939669,0.005964375,0.0012429417,0.0017901345,0.0005419042,0.00036645957,0.0048388336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039862874,0.00019476113,0.00015376328,0.0071715126,0.0015591965,0.0014643889,0.0025987593,0.00047817826,0.00060505985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047643785,0.000116304036,0.5992115,0.0005306912,0.00019151809,0.0012772781,0.039168302,0.0021631313,0.0014013696,0.05371454,0.008640494,0.29310834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016152295,0.00012280411,0.9244299,0.00047744298,0.000024663157,0.00093762495,0.022969417,0.0006908571,0.00026681414,0.009284498,0.040745452,0.000034255347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010583433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011815163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010583433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029630752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086626614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02149874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518467431","doi":"","title":"Effets incitatifs associes a l'aide sociale: approche de discontinuite de la regression","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02649637240488013,"score_gpt":0.33014696572016927,"score_spread":0.30365059331528915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518467431","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3967622,0.0040844786,0.57649463,0.006018849,0.001087478,0.0011852393,0.004565303,0.0015640534,0.008237794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88717407,0.0012960543,0.070620716,0.0013772554,0.0005133905,0.0019777957,0.0042004357,0.00032294882,0.032517303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9497222,0.03867297,0.0018881615,0.005965832,0.002562669,0.0011882014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8171065,0.14566055,0.010408305,0.019194307,0.0064262454,0.0012041084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07242173,0.0014364792,0.0030464588,0.0016893848,0.001523383,0.003249395,0.008712648,0.0031980416,0.010982498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14291285,0.001438284,0.004628222,0.002718638,0.0028063075,0.0026522977,0.0022575874,0.0059217256,0.002538252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038682006,0.00070997473,0.66278964,0.0009424825,0.0068795066,0.001063536,0.004388256,0.12127528,0.0018131941,0.035946313,0.010921104,0.1494025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011659485,0.0035051003,0.23016442,0.00077462575,0.005222878,0.0007248824,0.002545028,0.627476,0.0045986297,0.05238357,0.07102773,0.00041121626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04881059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023628853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07242173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017265544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027929952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3830073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518544087","doi":"10.7202/010169ar","title":"Environnement familial et bien-être économique des enfants américains","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Poverty; Demography; Inequality; Census; White (mutation); Psychology; Geography; Sociology; Political science; Population","score_opus":0.017398500269045394,"score_gpt":0.25117320271325616,"score_spread":0.23377470244421078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518544087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97632754,0.002536986,0.00094299664,0.0005792691,0.000022283346,0.000012597094,0.012811759,0.000025971325,0.0067406334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896019,0.0018965395,0.00086686766,0.00008978003,0.000025298034,0.000046084173,0.0055404026,0.000012784242,0.0019203039],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992543,0.00023512333,0.000076836885,0.00021144688,0.00012270562,0.00009958216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976259,0.00086351845,0.00077262806,0.00022102223,0.0004162325,0.00010072333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012750517,0.00020972027,0.00030819053,0.0015704647,0.0005273138,0.0008691715,0.0002904977,0.00019449428,0.0036070475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00480918,0.00017023286,0.0004413461,0.0037999805,0.00025615585,0.00052746583,0.000457005,0.00030843803,0.00024216196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049931477,0.00001279333,0.9853923,0.00007940389,0.00022256802,0.00010380505,0.001819776,0.00032810992,0.00012919203,0.0005761167,0.0011769375,0.010109066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001065328,0.0000065075856,0.9957547,0.000023499906,0.00003120479,0.000044476827,0.00061175274,0.00009223313,0.000043526732,0.00007023783,0.0033177717,0.0000028950194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31451023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29593325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31451023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012698083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007859692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6253592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519700191","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.16926628.v1","title":"Diversity or Polarisation? The Growth in Work-Rich and Work-Poor Individuals, Families and Communities between 1986 and 1996","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Victoria University","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Paid work; Diversity (politics); Demographic economics; Prime time; Labour economics; Political science; Demography; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Geography; Working hours","score_opus":0.029411574546266517,"score_gpt":0.27127594289624346,"score_spread":0.24186436834997693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519700191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98728627,0.0043055695,0.000057110916,0.003785214,0.00007909572,0.000015617856,0.001174128,0.0000062267322,0.0032908658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942806,0.0026949628,0.000064081556,0.00040843163,0.000091464455,0.000024982253,0.0007420367,0.000004768351,0.0016886783],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916315,0.0001490584,0.000063280924,0.00014890848,0.00015929165,0.00031637924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973316,0.00024542154,0.0009476189,0.0000823642,0.00048795124,0.00090515433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010631882,0.00022140204,0.00042457995,0.0026973318,0.0021487807,0.001984975,0.0007028034,0.00083495426,0.002467152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038837092,0.00024127166,0.00018997537,0.0041392148,0.0015910539,0.001929425,0.0037336622,0.0011337363,0.00046856364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003410099,0.00011861931,0.89609224,0.00020345142,0.000035131245,0.00069822103,0.040068917,0.00011499589,0.0005270969,0.0010542813,0.0052910694,0.05545501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003396733,0.000022474567,0.9737404,0.000075908625,0.0000031895604,0.00017859542,0.020009018,0.00003320224,0.00004916651,0.00014050974,0.005736691,0.0000074376376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103713185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12301016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103713185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027111664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014856764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20621902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520255224","doi":"","title":"Taxing Care : enhancing the childcare time in the dual earner era","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Poverty; Incentive; Labour economics; Dual (grammatical number); Economics; Child care; Work (physics); Paid work; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Working hours; Market economy; Medicine","score_opus":0.021914024535518457,"score_gpt":0.31508101864691795,"score_spread":0.2931669941113995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1520255224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9125385,0.0025148087,0.02413877,0.007804268,0.00024999198,0.00005118544,0.00038536504,0.000096476964,0.05222053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99262446,0.00034357986,0.002206467,0.00014270157,0.00004477292,0.000012859822,0.000041480514,0.000010386133,0.0045733824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997075,0.00008305351,0.000005813137,0.000029710412,0.00005675966,0.00011707374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994106,0.00012290332,0.00010767647,0.000075812764,0.000077844335,0.0002051952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000443811,0.00022033538,0.00027404077,0.00040351404,0.0004822281,0.0011269372,0.0005514194,0.00068260956,0.009008152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020078563,0.00007736956,0.0003012682,0.00036339328,0.0006457757,0.0009804225,0.0013925869,0.0006060858,0.0006129906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001838102,0.001344288,0.07592967,0.0004675612,0.00017031931,0.0017755722,0.0030578393,0.035633907,0.010118279,0.5294853,0.011975144,0.32820415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052896497,0.0024083473,0.2224682,0.0005686917,0.00029348797,0.0031268953,0.0075629433,0.08031289,0.0067091235,0.38661677,0.2892821,0.00012161298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031636893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043952605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009008152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077243627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008282914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030135214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520471341","doi":"10.17848/9780880995511.ch1","title":"Child Care and the Supply of Labor in Canada and the United State","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Business; Labour economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.006691475386035594,"score_gpt":0.20266856193980598,"score_spread":0.19597708655377039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1520471341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50723886,0.072603896,0.00048254087,0.048328687,0.00063715107,0.00006244733,0.0026928885,0.000042344134,0.36791116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9036772,0.023835454,0.00032211168,0.0018930795,0.000116146366,0.000038185608,0.00051516073,0.000029495286,0.06957313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985989,0.00014998307,0.00001766212,0.0000441328,0.00028660047,0.00090279477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869245,0.00029871456,0.00010726816,0.000017969132,0.0003278967,0.0005557709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055214675,0.00026135697,0.0004404137,0.0026799582,0.012892734,0.005100943,0.0013204959,0.0012176178,0.0074506076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025280435,0.00031490598,0.0003058737,0.0073767425,0.004101972,0.0010920428,0.001767612,0.0019934743,0.00024392469],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020216724,0.00022371933,0.1413895,0.00022315678,0.00005598872,0.0014460118,0.086507745,0.0033189515,0.0003264948,0.52522314,0.102572255,0.13851078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037014026,0.00004510675,0.33179754,0.0011816492,0.00004687453,0.00031312378,0.19881292,0.0018119356,0.00028504006,0.022492861,0.44308367,0.00009237729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11552601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11552601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15499486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8382038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521720362","doi":"10.7202/602027ar","title":"Les familles sans enfant ou avec enfants : aisance ou pauvreté? Les faits au Canada et au Québec de 1971 à 1987","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043477003713188384,"score_gpt":0.2918478092431704,"score_spread":0.248370805529982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521720362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929893,0.0011378706,0.000093183815,0.0010125132,0.000009838677,0.000010513225,0.0011260317,0.0000038055034,0.0036168664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954863,0.0007763475,0.00007647878,0.00006607795,0.000003733452,0.0000063498287,0.00032156755,0.0000018478878,0.003261287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994454,0.00004959919,0.000014673817,0.00006733342,0.00011224897,0.00031078144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988618,0.00010571069,0.00025678796,0.000025111029,0.0004802732,0.00027038282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005469113,0.00017737791,0.00027045413,0.0012972055,0.0034875101,0.0012898959,0.00061222626,0.00029354604,0.003202121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001368989,0.00015847762,0.0001800699,0.0024630257,0.0013004025,0.0005106014,0.0006935248,0.00050168164,0.00013981634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012389156,0.00002986806,0.9242911,0.00006581325,0.000051617226,0.00038327638,0.037141427,0.00039410766,0.0005577649,0.0040616263,0.0030244358,0.029875072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000252683,0.000022239043,0.95274466,0.00006365753,0.000013333675,0.000063611944,0.037626673,0.00014893762,0.00015444362,0.00011151168,0.009033747,0.0000147384135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99536043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03155169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03155169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024329638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22892457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521813107","doi":"","title":"KINSHIP CARE POLICY: EXACERBATING WOMEN'S OPPRESSION THROUGH NEOLIBERAL FAMILIALIZATION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"MacSphere (McMaster University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Kinship; Kinship care; Gender studies; Political science; Sociology; Anthropology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.023592977790996398,"score_gpt":0.2550628664299836,"score_spread":0.2314698886389872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521813107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8119022,0.0016753941,0.0009432697,0.029428324,0.00008870435,0.0000595279,0.000049154354,0.000014895081,0.15583846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880823,0.00063155167,0.0001823886,0.000651685,0.000010433356,0.00001713625,0.000007713916,0.000003846381,0.010412869],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997806,0.00093327096,0.00003600981,0.00012227331,0.00026993942,0.00083249784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988086,0.00033178873,0.00021251799,0.00006826752,0.00018367832,0.000395059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019466367,0.00015876697,0.00014524814,0.00060679734,0.018118812,0.003199425,0.0007871388,0.00089213013,0.0035359315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003086267,0.00012723629,0.00011108049,0.0008276748,0.014075606,0.0018347359,0.0046219523,0.0011999198,0.00012044158],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056616944,0.000055164197,0.03135031,0.00010888637,0.000010123973,0.0011029094,0.716389,0.0003338478,0.00065221696,0.2028681,0.008922281,0.03815047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016566244,0.000044411936,0.043463353,0.0004278374,0.0000143337975,0.00034291224,0.7078839,0.00032462872,0.0005943087,0.010534424,0.23632964,0.000023712537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7354812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87689215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7354812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05986352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050337747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5321532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522337257","doi":"","title":"Our Grandmothers, Ourselves: Reflections of Canadian Women","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.03691917296317944,"score_gpt":0.30073659229808913,"score_spread":0.2638174193349097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522337257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50827855,0.02396246,0.00093353924,0.27890995,0.0064939354,0.00032039208,0.00080311886,0.00008589891,0.18021208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83198595,0.01280881,0.0007356544,0.04895135,0.00075091544,0.00020557665,0.00018059253,0.0002144581,0.10416679],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901788,0.003001868,0.0001871853,0.000579948,0.0015280098,0.004524128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98378307,0.005772894,0.00077600667,0.00022619485,0.0036699036,0.0057719448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070971847,0.0016687798,0.0012981787,0.0039815493,0.1116599,0.015735049,0.004341372,0.010824221,0.010355132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019849923,0.0012244029,0.00081766205,0.007299052,0.031845357,0.0050163637,0.01170952,0.022479717,0.0008597407],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035174307,0.000017000411,0.0010616446,0.00006302567,0.000005878267,0.00057423767,0.97006565,0.000030497898,0.00016754227,0.006774031,0.017944671,0.0032606614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003735914,0.0000060238817,0.0008892424,0.00008037253,0.0000072089615,0.00006624574,0.9282549,0.000009414399,0.000052561205,0.00032184934,0.070287265,0.000021121095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98916245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99548185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14625655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14625655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16691498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9902214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522508722","doi":"","title":"Household Labour Supply and Welfare Participation in Sweden","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Labour supply; Earnings; Incentive; Economics; Labour economics; Work (physics); Quality (philosophy); Schedule; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.017798691644048487,"score_gpt":0.2831244129967102,"score_spread":0.26532572135266175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522508722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944706,0.00017664138,0.0031015929,0.00021441489,0.000005148517,0.000011884756,0.0002373198,0.000014919624,0.0017674164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974125,0.00021414584,0.0006838542,0.000019384703,0.0000051531215,0.000037752117,0.00027644375,0.000005705487,0.0013451718],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992563,0.0004074677,0.000031030173,0.00006902561,0.00007102118,0.00016521158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872273,0.00079301704,0.00028705783,0.00007217607,0.000055779088,0.00006911895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009959665,0.00039373996,0.0005542289,0.00088183675,0.0004522016,0.0015363415,0.00040573327,0.00077427865,0.0035642125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037514567,0.00037137393,0.00063059136,0.0010132968,0.00066485495,0.00071878114,0.0012475448,0.00046820776,0.00047163924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004282421,0.00035182186,0.36164072,0.00014633984,0.00029790725,0.0007978428,0.003384861,0.580579,0.00066381344,0.023096828,0.001302591,0.027310029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023806309,0.0006583704,0.32180807,0.00045009665,0.00022723766,0.0005716727,0.008867613,0.5809016,0.0014493234,0.07092932,0.0137752695,0.0001232859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015894774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012351925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015894774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011692725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012359134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03160453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523501416","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.546144","title":"On Representative Social Capital","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012684795782990052,"score_gpt":0.2968467931060323,"score_spread":0.28416199732304226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523501416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19793466,0.0029175878,0.046755906,0.038774654,0.00037665546,0.00008611543,0.000360937,0.00005021086,0.7127432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710027,0.00109327,0.001087169,0.0008062659,0.00029551427,0.0000570405,0.00005895553,0.000012317064,0.025586635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988998,0.00039913823,0.000024590463,0.00020202974,0.00013936522,0.0003349862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752516,0.0013623144,0.000299093,0.0003963665,0.0002283366,0.00018881683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018576973,0.00044290317,0.0006355467,0.001108057,0.002258551,0.003067239,0.00072574953,0.0022963425,0.01937645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065000704,0.0002327607,0.0003187435,0.0013066486,0.0064185252,0.0057140994,0.0023941111,0.0018899542,0.00081099453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007135429,0.000012315038,0.00045920615,0.0000071362456,0.0000038014302,0.000024796596,0.00019451391,0.000350418,0.000021740225,0.9943711,0.0013881061,0.0031596795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008583903,0.00000810892,0.0009440232,0.000016604283,0.000004115464,0.000021295831,0.00019955041,0.0007473367,0.000035365385,0.9907088,0.0073024747,0.0000037233704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004394735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004084517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01937645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023778363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011242278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06482071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526196312","doi":"","title":"Sommaire de : L'instabilite des gains familiaux et du revenu familial au Canada, 1986 a 1991 et 1996 a 2001","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04211805407442039,"score_gpt":0.3295141840995226,"score_spread":0.2873961300251022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526196312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656551,0.0018980198,0.00048478282,0.0028510669,0.000042139374,0.00006199861,0.013490375,0.00003707773,0.0154793635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97597617,0.0013864267,0.0005506678,0.00015142326,0.000017239967,0.000082028964,0.0042391433,0.000014839757,0.017581949],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806505,0.00015351585,0.000069384,0.00025158824,0.0008316894,0.00062884967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99262846,0.0008482602,0.0013563513,0.00032069272,0.0034114702,0.0014347732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020355387,0.0002936815,0.00036489748,0.002503057,0.0037654478,0.0023002492,0.0011694701,0.00050149683,0.006260871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007566069,0.00027395535,0.00047968983,0.0047102054,0.0010439149,0.0007761473,0.0015820595,0.0011863789,0.00053141546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025096245,0.00005067122,0.9196312,0.00012682873,0.000112913585,0.00013623759,0.012746838,0.00088650314,0.00032575094,0.003810727,0.005292886,0.056628477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036922906,0.00001554548,0.9881692,0.000058829668,0.000016423182,0.00002680961,0.0042165616,0.00010500292,0.000103261584,0.00008907429,0.0071839187,0.000011560949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9877637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035961848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035961848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053339705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26092273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526387647","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01673.x","title":"Domestic violence and women's autonomy in developing countries: theory and evidence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":271,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Jealousy; Endogeneity; Autonomy; Bargaining power; Economics; Poison control; Demographic economics; Human factors and ergonomics; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Medicine; Environmental health; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.1013641400484464,"score_gpt":0.21820672584728826,"score_spread":0.11684258579884185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526387647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.914176,0.029744519,0.003041021,0.0062753675,0.000044888075,0.000025925494,0.0003076853,0.000011017116,0.046373498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961808,0.0035831323,0.000075439726,0.000055206096,0.000013917228,0.00000205157,0.000014897411,5.838849e-7,0.00007399513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985667,0.0008741268,0.00005668608,0.00015274285,0.00018221034,0.00016753697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97155863,0.02233203,0.0042841486,0.0006166432,0.000772906,0.00043569412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034747978,0.0002683032,0.0004196349,0.0021507477,0.00070591737,0.0020755779,0.0007070471,0.0005720475,0.003931292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012583953,0.00024079597,0.00034523787,0.0025876875,0.0055681085,0.0012391655,0.0016253716,0.00080235803,0.000114600036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019691842,0.00020232127,0.737573,0.0007988046,0.00053678866,0.00089484913,0.004530429,0.0128314905,0.00009250451,0.18263343,0.0013561947,0.058353245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014503665,0.00038875686,0.7239047,0.0030135594,0.00056567835,0.0013219201,0.026066879,0.021802725,0.00060494384,0.19699849,0.025109092,0.000078159515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012743166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00488981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012743166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012219726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008193209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025337994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526738299","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.345460","title":"Bayesian Analysis of An Econometric Model of Birth Inputs and Outputs","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"National Longitudinal Surveys; Birth weight; Generalized estimating equation; Gestational age; Econometrics; Statistics; Obstetrics; Mathematics; Medicine; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.018003099180288976,"score_gpt":0.2534899412608848,"score_spread":0.23548684208059584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526738299","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1862984,0.00060877413,0.80290526,0.0024535318,0.00007192858,0.00011572202,0.0009770796,0.0004418742,0.006127533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9329154,0.0008105497,0.049860526,0.00019598624,0.00014458233,0.00018794718,0.0009839754,0.00014132417,0.014759794],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712557,0.0017232044,0.00010935343,0.0004234815,0.00031258256,0.00030571953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96763146,0.029255137,0.0012374145,0.0006804738,0.0009271965,0.00026840888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008653586,0.00081171084,0.002425949,0.0016103281,0.0007901674,0.0023139932,0.0019960573,0.0027182358,0.008034308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03672482,0.0017551483,0.001658062,0.0017218458,0.0016809442,0.0026817075,0.0012668034,0.0028316705,0.00092392985],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017806441,0.00010347018,0.0040607243,0.00006151336,0.00015182857,0.00014708616,0.00018369137,0.8338553,0.00051846314,0.14503434,0.0017320486,0.01397349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039279697,0.000019208645,0.0014857738,0.000012110294,0.000034388715,0.000022945778,0.000026860072,0.96296847,0.000107017244,0.03484837,0.0004092576,0.000026380927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040232703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030158421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040232703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024777916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026477946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07999706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528283841","doi":"","title":"Fiscalité, effets de voisinage et offre de travail au noir","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Economics; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037360448645718185,"score_gpt":0.3264545261281376,"score_spread":0.2890940774824194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528283841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9830716,0.0018514089,0.00035833486,0.0011419668,0.0000408116,0.000013381639,0.00038323598,0.000029658864,0.013109594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991211,0.0007674223,0.0001758669,0.000075156204,0.000037039335,0.0000064272704,0.00031151914,0.00001463629,0.0074008764],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925023,0.0003127856,0.000038979044,0.000106635714,0.00014202748,0.0001494141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98724943,0.006800576,0.0030305453,0.0005643217,0.00051418866,0.0018410475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021324311,0.00019423832,0.0003693336,0.0007172976,0.00052633934,0.0018431392,0.0005433024,0.00069212174,0.011750879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0148593,0.00015892736,0.00045055972,0.0006012692,0.00059071096,0.0006698741,0.00055932533,0.0009338345,0.0014623356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044699158,0.0015355003,0.9257278,0.00010906842,0.00044082047,0.00018358746,0.0006700614,0.0036711558,0.0009872498,0.0063120592,0.0017214936,0.054171294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014005287,0.0007232356,0.98346126,0.0000835841,0.0002002344,0.0001668079,0.0013360925,0.0029590116,0.0005081358,0.0046874653,0.005700509,0.000033599677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035504077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03350274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035504077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013151998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012805382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07059485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530868015","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1545711","title":"Gender and Racial Biases: Evidence from Child Adoption","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"African american; Girl; Race (biology); Psychology; Foreign born; Set (abstract data type); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Demography; Gender studies; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.02303823057089708,"score_gpt":0.28920589483003756,"score_spread":0.26616766425914046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530868015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993747,0.0018425689,0.000139036,0.00043636383,0.00002000201,0.00000865384,0.00013827288,0.0000011740976,0.0036669623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982424,0.00084964186,0.00010830836,0.00018106696,0.000015994035,0.000014129152,0.0000765779,0.0000030830502,0.0005088761],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947008,0.0035001526,0.00021129465,0.0004900558,0.0006805861,0.0004171105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9504404,0.026609765,0.015714806,0.0036632395,0.0024098803,0.0011618353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076387892,0.00029539753,0.00041329284,0.0011755107,0.0018868283,0.0011433994,0.000911128,0.0011397619,0.0057759434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04363756,0.00036602296,0.0003827346,0.0023045933,0.0023598997,0.0010223766,0.0013068657,0.0007900094,0.0003270354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033632637,0.00013890649,0.9793914,0.00007515113,0.00015563049,0.00014991066,0.0105321845,0.000031889922,0.00021128236,0.0012795621,0.0003819919,0.0073157647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019060048,0.0001214445,0.98682296,0.00014557363,0.00016117284,0.00023329344,0.009623263,0.0000630612,0.00035221886,0.00067853613,0.0017670027,0.00001240591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027631713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03495185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027631713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004064735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075269485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054941714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531545156","doi":"10.4000/interventionseconomiques.725","title":"L’impact de la politique conservatrice de réforme du financement des services de garde sur la pauvreté et l’inégalité au Québec","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Interventions économiques","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Poverty; Welfare economics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025562268451289602,"score_gpt":0.3171171183422653,"score_spread":0.2915548498909757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531545156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8723164,0.011010098,0.005092885,0.03940945,0.00023595255,0.00074039685,0.0007224618,0.00006525308,0.07040705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98159546,0.0024721115,0.002416021,0.0023195944,0.00006799429,0.00032429874,0.00016725707,0.000008595081,0.010628709],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963238,0.0017566546,0.00008872275,0.00023016159,0.0006592807,0.00094137574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942058,0.002652386,0.0007444413,0.00031720658,0.0012941504,0.0007861105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00514316,0.00036084896,0.0004693515,0.0010568928,0.0018819493,0.0018973869,0.00076482055,0.00095419923,0.006544394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011599692,0.00018945549,0.00044542452,0.0011012753,0.002112609,0.00083317864,0.0014759367,0.0011846918,0.00016702425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021929636,0.0016173634,0.26899576,0.0027817264,0.0011792373,0.00093014754,0.022532146,0.022124622,0.011467645,0.25773272,0.015242426,0.39320326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053672824,0.0025513272,0.7639336,0.0022144034,0.00085833983,0.00014247623,0.01344532,0.0057455907,0.0040505123,0.009391614,0.19699927,0.0001308598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6853047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8259468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3146953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02701624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04534779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6330972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531600104","doi":"10.7202/039577ar","title":"Ellen Bayuk Rosenman, and Claudia C. Klaver, eds. Other Mothers: Beyond the Maternal Ideal. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2008. ISBN: 978-0814202869. US$55.95","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); State (computer science); Sociology; Media studies; History; Humanities; Political science; Art; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009556658823160492,"score_gpt":0.2210593026056636,"score_spread":0.2115026437825031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531600104","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004171041,0.9643061,0.00054771407,0.011567964,0.0015922335,0.000009394464,0.00007563101,0.00003598149,0.02144785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0051957336,0.9345212,0.0012718233,0.0010864132,0.00066847395,0.000026161853,0.000118902884,0.000049980008,0.05706128],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993438,0.00024182767,0.000043136988,0.00008625526,0.00021715798,0.00006779344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893194,0.0005197032,0.00012957166,0.000036026213,0.00020437606,0.00017846953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017823499,0.0016821104,0.0010599752,0.0017939148,0.0014051936,0.0036716212,0.0011782566,0.0022425565,0.0371745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019399419,0.001129705,0.0004270373,0.0027358453,0.0016245401,0.0065655434,0.0018220085,0.0028127348,0.019179896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052267456,0.000031976637,0.0005379847,0.0013940501,0.000012232247,0.00013813902,0.0034341526,0.00009304611,0.00017302671,0.008819478,0.70376706,0.28154653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055994933,0.000012873622,0.0014890316,0.0020758472,0.00001343351,0.00038340458,0.003784865,0.000053385073,0.00012384898,0.0063898265,0.9856501,0.000017680495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014470365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031181479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0371745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023987805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036855007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1243611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535147298","doi":"10.3386/w20201","title":"Women's Income and Marriage Markets in the United States: Evidence from the Civil War Pension","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Economic History Association; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Pension; Spanish Civil War; Pension system; Economics; Political science; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.24887217729364963,"score_gpt":0.46494763276169315,"score_spread":0.21607545546804352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535147298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99620914,0.0010009377,0.000033910077,0.000435259,0.00001192592,0.000007623487,0.00086252694,0.0000019809977,0.0014368555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99723583,0.0010629483,0.000027839433,0.00010515032,0.000021122563,0.0000092419,0.0009001823,0.0000017872212,0.000635842],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995751,0.0001562089,0.00003768133,0.000053143143,0.00007668598,0.00010114096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633706,0.00093097414,0.0017751508,0.0001655507,0.00030627468,0.00048489208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011403695,0.00018211066,0.00030710764,0.0010875942,0.00076251366,0.0010060085,0.00052488793,0.00042211273,0.0029606463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033640028,0.00023516249,0.00033801375,0.001847222,0.00048348992,0.0005221382,0.00094148866,0.0005422726,0.00033664392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012683847,0.00017574259,0.9917601,0.000018887768,0.00007291929,0.00007774189,0.00070998474,0.00007077413,0.000033402906,0.00030465698,0.0012369212,0.0054121143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105711915,0.00004051784,0.9972253,0.000019578185,0.00002905239,0.000027636062,0.0014610089,0.00009610344,0.000024104878,0.00007064226,0.0009923421,0.000003174368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060105044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10605165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060105044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052987906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000490823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11951041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538659675","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Income Splitting on Intrafamily Distribution in a Dynamic Family Bargaining Model","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Spouse; Economics; Taxable income; Bargaining power; Labour economics; Labour supply; Welfare; Income tax; Distribution (mathematics); Demographic economics; Public economics; Microeconomics; Law; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.03979369560422289,"score_gpt":0.37399426497408794,"score_spread":0.33420056936986503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538659675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58175933,0.0008975236,0.29983574,0.004584758,0.0001539338,0.00013392174,0.0004734992,0.00013302879,0.11202822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97985876,0.00041225072,0.0056381617,0.00014747835,0.000034367546,0.00006670594,0.000060037088,0.000024329833,0.01375801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897194,0.00045948842,0.000022302725,0.00012566124,0.000117350086,0.00030330243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804604,0.0011059224,0.00026248003,0.0001066905,0.000106493506,0.0003724408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002625852,0.0008828869,0.0012516761,0.00075279415,0.0014194511,0.0025641066,0.0020302266,0.0019049313,0.011858634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045103473,0.00046990326,0.0009779866,0.000974235,0.0023480386,0.0025568546,0.0017211868,0.0019861874,0.000982657],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021598545,0.00015264668,0.0024944937,0.000045980218,0.000060527585,0.0005454662,0.00055399636,0.40838102,0.0010321985,0.57379276,0.0017519927,0.010972987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086461354,0.000091448455,0.001230638,0.00002564981,0.000040429662,0.00013225262,0.00038130206,0.67151105,0.00010928217,0.3245805,0.001774984,0.000036035442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00888993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005271486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011858634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032264262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010619026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039671123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538849650","doi":"10.7202/601212ar","title":"L’aide sociale et le supplément au revenu de travail : une simulation économique des revenus (salaires) de réserve","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05937351845191609,"score_gpt":0.2981005998967756,"score_spread":0.23872708144485955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538849650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9572852,0.00035527482,0.02232794,0.0011910759,0.000069574526,0.00027080905,0.0012771777,0.00007257792,0.017150184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983854,0.00027859843,0.008101595,0.00007373962,0.000011635966,0.00031380865,0.0003406562,0.000017684972,0.0070082303],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991872,0.000524398,0.000022023536,0.00008779213,0.000054018445,0.0001244608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635726,0.0027349514,0.00021744224,0.00012556097,0.0003273141,0.00023740773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019399899,0.00059893134,0.00085220725,0.0005727436,0.0007475733,0.0016019798,0.0010063268,0.0014958277,0.009959205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053199613,0.0003574467,0.0011695655,0.0008351285,0.00074021565,0.001088345,0.0009623844,0.0012690617,0.00034541404],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087735604,0.0004602888,0.027380953,0.00020537018,0.00022049712,0.00017890698,0.0009185296,0.9389818,0.00096956955,0.019079959,0.0011743916,0.00955234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031603055,0.0007442392,0.013685032,0.00009092813,0.00015522381,0.000032053882,0.0012732097,0.9715337,0.000530034,0.0062003937,0.0053739287,0.000065142245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2388375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20605515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2388375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040471703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046754875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47489458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539911811","doi":"","title":"Efficiency and the Division of Marital Assets","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Asset (computer security); Division (mathematics); Economics; Consumption (sociology); Work (physics); Division of labour; Investment (military); Incentive; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Law; Market economy; Sociology; Engineering; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.030592828732101913,"score_gpt":0.3283414944450407,"score_spread":0.2977486657129388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539911811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8829586,0.00105568,0.03553209,0.0011351438,0.000022866569,0.00005086056,0.0001045705,0.000017110302,0.07912307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940982,0.00020671019,0.0011462969,0.000037736994,0.000009913548,0.00001390828,0.00002108297,0.0000036329625,0.0044624032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863285,0.00049863325,0.000074367235,0.00020702038,0.00030397973,0.00028313714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99428815,0.002600812,0.0016182325,0.0007286673,0.0003408812,0.00042324106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024142943,0.00017237915,0.00038714032,0.0006617602,0.000836995,0.0019704911,0.00064071955,0.0006698613,0.008188359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010051002,0.00017775277,0.0002905725,0.00061880064,0.0028460273,0.0020634641,0.0018419718,0.00054201315,0.00049211737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014053044,0.0001661098,0.048519537,0.000051827006,0.0000472756,0.00024446895,0.0014421283,0.009110421,0.0016487412,0.88442326,0.00068307994,0.05352253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008748503,0.00020184222,0.06882515,0.0001450353,0.000038048747,0.00045718078,0.002275042,0.022973133,0.0036158892,0.87835,0.02299757,0.000033596098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014373207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017289764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008188359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017670391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088291673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027392805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541277990","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.34.3.321","title":"Child Poverty and Family Structure in Canada, 1981-1997","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Child poverty; Incidence (geometry); Demographic economics; Economics; Geography; Demography; Economic growth; Sociology","score_opus":0.04231298995691719,"score_gpt":0.3122307364317755,"score_spread":0.26991774647485833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541277990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97625923,0.003202511,0.000083751256,0.0013076348,0.00003143345,0.000038290364,0.014071812,0.000014889998,0.004990411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893244,0.0023017584,0.0001504548,0.00011928623,0.000013617557,0.000024240408,0.0051105088,0.000005922888,0.0029498916],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908316,0.000042642052,0.000034161727,0.00007161906,0.0003542251,0.00041416072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997338,0.00010099741,0.00048175702,0.00005954155,0.00144573,0.0005740131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069154945,0.00025408613,0.00038713033,0.0026504225,0.004101567,0.0012620414,0.0010057047,0.00041179097,0.0022219485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027234165,0.00027385217,0.00041728537,0.0071445717,0.0008036413,0.0004944496,0.0010839377,0.00084594724,0.0002623206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014035597,0.00006018504,0.9692255,0.0000772747,0.000063501,0.0001882036,0.0037715875,0.0004353529,0.00012205471,0.00073786685,0.005585904,0.019592177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030863687,0.000009274771,0.99529654,0.000028007944,0.000006059061,0.000039824667,0.0014095036,0.00009364489,0.000030892414,0.00002123812,0.0030562778,0.0000057066795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99754566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053098004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053098004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039798323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3852548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542889439","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.588346","title":"A Collective Retirement Model: Identification and Estimation in the Presence of Externalities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Identification (biology); Estimation; Economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01921017063640879,"score_gpt":0.2936529641318108,"score_spread":0.274442793495402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542889439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7235392,0.0007027319,0.2639569,0.0033349025,0.00020492346,0.00022714908,0.0016827778,0.00023348998,0.0061179637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962139,0.00044537243,0.018120212,0.0001742559,0.00011388618,0.00030689238,0.0009006303,0.000023540884,0.017776236],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989704,0.00049341196,0.000050729643,0.00022416977,0.00007809172,0.00018315371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944478,0.003703828,0.0008457179,0.00033675562,0.0002924573,0.00037342394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060282056,0.0007447334,0.0022803599,0.001068266,0.0008976861,0.0021546246,0.0019631903,0.0030036045,0.0066116364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009492642,0.0007564776,0.001074517,0.0014939792,0.0009360219,0.0015456141,0.0016499237,0.002344805,0.001183251],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007338947,0.00070333824,0.06743347,0.00019894069,0.00061014,0.0006824615,0.0009831599,0.8213759,0.00046717058,0.05772123,0.007161865,0.041928373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016678341,0.00018515618,0.0067265057,0.000039828563,0.00013263621,0.000073208525,0.0003497206,0.9713013,0.000095489195,0.0194467,0.0014517789,0.000030923115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015522553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014281028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015522553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009794431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018394846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031880558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544895496","doi":"10.3386/w19544","title":"A Comparison of Micro and Macro Expenditure Measures Across Countries Using Differing Survey Methods","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Macro; Econometrics; Statistics; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5098818008180629,"score_gpt":0.6033778172380398,"score_spread":0.09349601641997696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544895496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9382332,0.0032509817,0.019009175,0.0005719734,0.00015909581,0.00027910096,0.012029098,0.00012013351,0.026347259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698924,0.0023618918,0.014828579,0.00016454016,0.00006899087,0.00043485503,0.010595688,0.000087448316,0.0015655379],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97095406,0.019189883,0.0024071652,0.0012670675,0.0052082683,0.0009735375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93481517,0.031919338,0.012143549,0.0071434546,0.013297174,0.0006812193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023349324,0.00053526525,0.00080314284,0.008158375,0.0004469442,0.0023949472,0.00073463307,0.00048678849,0.0016958152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077900626,0.0003442327,0.00079353555,0.019342951,0.0007952455,0.0017156369,0.0021567917,0.0005142579,0.0005521286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007360772,0.00013364191,0.87437147,0.0010686521,0.0017166502,0.00010941571,0.0041349335,0.004573346,0.00091033237,0.009268748,0.0035331505,0.09944345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030120964,0.00036441692,0.9820093,0.00029578217,0.00036089026,0.00013867804,0.004327612,0.0009889879,0.0012925235,0.00081522786,0.009328891,0.000047606565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009396717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0108291805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023349324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008673576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091987086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12348455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545905191","doi":"10.1016/j.red.2014.11.004","title":"Women's emancipation through education: A macroeconomic analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Dynamics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Research Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Marriage market; Economics; Counterfactual thinking; Educational attainment; Human capital; Labour economics; Remarriage; Demographic economics; Higher education; Quarter (Canadian coin); Value (mathematics); Economic growth; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.015124035208795562,"score_gpt":0.30972550213696637,"score_spread":0.2946014669281708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545905191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4387599,0.370771,0.0059310133,0.08720318,0.0007156262,0.00006508699,0.0021892618,0.000040607218,0.094324216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8615558,0.12966149,0.0004525617,0.0008294873,0.000569274,0.000026494854,0.00021067924,0.000012156355,0.0066820052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999605,0.00012563838,0.000017022532,0.000044840745,0.000066035325,0.00014153021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894184,0.00045085317,0.0003135691,0.00003722587,0.00013927648,0.00011719847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090398884,0.00024584812,0.0004762952,0.001528633,0.0006463779,0.003019462,0.00028491372,0.0007529035,0.002809413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00230041,0.00013715898,0.00039057483,0.004248148,0.0011159702,0.0020228897,0.0016241735,0.0010205202,0.0001821916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030169621,0.0002098628,0.09292744,0.0016406575,0.00036011517,0.0005488967,0.0030942915,0.0101827625,0.00039466703,0.6695668,0.022711115,0.19806169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006842257,0.00029691236,0.33984184,0.0036391683,0.0004427155,0.00037981465,0.0117657,0.008758544,0.0011665464,0.18328017,0.45028666,0.0000735352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012738602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01775065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012738602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00340719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024752342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025328934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546429295","doi":"10.7202/000427ar","title":"Famille nucléaire et accueil de parents dans les ménages urbains au Gabon","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Physics; Art","score_opus":0.02244812367829299,"score_gpt":0.25588327939590483,"score_spread":0.23343515571761184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546429295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986621,0.00055673404,0.00006555296,0.00010311257,0.0000022901688,0.0000050299964,0.00003442227,0.0000014270942,0.0005692389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984988,0.0004223742,0.00010759721,0.000020259862,0.000001358927,0.000008297394,0.000021125488,0.0000011197134,0.00091911294],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992766,0.00038479434,0.000023402847,0.000085604304,0.00005661348,0.00017304702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998882,0.000448728,0.00034083216,0.000044720582,0.00018027621,0.0001035171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015476163,0.00029085824,0.00024247686,0.0011002031,0.0017816128,0.0013592073,0.00031806657,0.00037260234,0.0025303026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033119835,0.00025245544,0.00016008952,0.001301677,0.0010106724,0.00060594373,0.0008735271,0.00036378426,0.0001907926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001325479,0.000026031841,0.7116199,0.000085770385,0.000037579743,0.0009117437,0.26486737,0.00016521278,0.0010932398,0.001860978,0.00033867423,0.018860921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058157116,0.00008704235,0.78259087,0.00020691284,0.00004213354,0.00035685961,0.21142045,0.00020320762,0.00029930813,0.00030052126,0.004465873,0.00002098751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30696878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42802638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30696878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032031913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019348043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6103641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546649291","doi":"","title":"MODÈLE DYNAMIQUE EN PRÉSENCE DE BIAIS DE SÉLECTION ET D’HÉTÉROGÉNÉITÉ INOBSERVÉE: APPLICATION À LA PARTICIPATION DES FEMMES SUR LE MARCHÉ DU TRAVAIL AU CANADA","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de recherche","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.19682097114229682,"score_gpt":0.3432596986355815,"score_spread":0.14643872749328465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546649291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85120964,0.0015945999,0.12893447,0.0028951527,0.00006988389,0.00018572489,0.0019506793,0.0003017886,0.012857999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708172,0.0007714608,0.015526283,0.000088272674,0.00001684503,0.00006681096,0.00056075264,0.000027355587,0.012125045],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953413,0.000121809324,0.000016545848,0.000112312686,0.00009882659,0.00011643452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991615,0.00040969808,0.000082211816,0.000046280456,0.00023987933,0.000060438455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012859085,0.0005440841,0.0007292271,0.00063429435,0.00092138886,0.0016864698,0.0012965489,0.0011128639,0.005004986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024613629,0.00028106367,0.00085677375,0.0012925257,0.00083352375,0.00054452487,0.0010295111,0.0012591496,0.0002889506],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044282197,0.00012914541,0.270579,0.00028178378,0.0004344173,0.00089062593,0.0036788546,0.5438655,0.0034906645,0.064327136,0.004632298,0.10724767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003981318,0.00009163631,0.10781841,0.00010578363,0.0002001521,0.00011899471,0.0030442984,0.8655095,0.00083922007,0.010679229,0.0114541575,0.000098789795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8839438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81909937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116056204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006183764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009283741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23347932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W154729589","doi":"10.1037/h0087168","title":"Les qualités psychométriques du PSA-A.","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.19780826393587572,"score_gpt":0.3093492179410287,"score_spread":0.11154095400515299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W154729589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9756765,0.0014471587,0.0034491443,0.00035548786,0.000100190286,0.0002140581,0.004630625,0.000099626996,0.014027152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99164164,0.00057823816,0.0028237102,0.000057196467,0.000024672352,0.00028994094,0.0010295163,0.000018945113,0.0035360798],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970862,0.0009875945,0.00020522601,0.0003368315,0.00121393,0.00017013056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906527,0.003976088,0.0019907868,0.00043924965,0.0024927517,0.00044844608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040769763,0.00065931043,0.00041268108,0.0016577281,0.00049331266,0.0011647674,0.00044536547,0.00053367834,0.0030789024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018468328,0.00021546734,0.0006908374,0.0012186047,0.00054893974,0.0006805916,0.0008075359,0.0007340001,0.0005623386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022025332,0.000111018184,0.92609096,0.00022244446,0.00022092609,0.00013144327,0.0046059266,0.00035579014,0.0029954165,0.0006644152,0.0010302147,0.06335112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049555597,0.00025554423,0.9955419,0.000022817,0.000028828677,0.0002518239,0.0007771416,0.0002058854,0.0006686846,0.00018670858,0.0020422437,0.000013637431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012030452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009550893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012030452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081812456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007774127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023920834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547959588","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.00502.x","title":"Sexual orientation, work, and income in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Demographic economics; Educational attainment; Orientation (vector space); Work (physics); Psychology; Economics; Social psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0828284863006427,"score_gpt":0.19379874203877862,"score_spread":0.11097025573813592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547959588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9576593,0.0031726472,0.0002183574,0.0033119086,0.00006970222,0.000055320183,0.016168747,0.000020399735,0.019323507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992168,0.0013074651,0.00018205232,0.00021607995,0.00000983112,0.000014018621,0.0026118823,0.0000063297366,0.0034843734],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990013,0.0000797443,0.000043763575,0.00009162612,0.00037803166,0.00040564287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996207,0.00026401092,0.000581812,0.00009539582,0.0017657413,0.0010859651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010125007,0.00022612778,0.00044411107,0.0024983743,0.0048212353,0.0021291077,0.0009197004,0.00035410334,0.0045203115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032241773,0.00021214655,0.00044986611,0.0067726756,0.00091509614,0.00039934154,0.0012965341,0.0009997083,0.00026929166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070320566,0.000056564924,0.97667617,0.000050282833,0.00005861204,0.00012883285,0.0016320181,0.00028171312,0.000056034136,0.0018327404,0.005787331,0.013369378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006929634,0.000012353879,0.992447,0.000064556094,0.000018564711,0.00003084424,0.0021223556,0.00026688035,0.000047006026,0.00017876945,0.0047917827,0.000012883053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99916494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0353673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0353673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051306434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2566089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549258081","doi":"","title":"The impacts of the 1988 tax reform on married women's labour supply in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Labour supply; Labour economics; Tax reform; Income tax; Tax rate; State income tax; Earned income tax credit; Demographic economics; Tax credit; Monetary economics; Public economics","score_opus":0.016712066152625923,"score_gpt":0.2868842914080659,"score_spread":0.27017222525543994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549258081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903797,0.0010060898,0.000038762963,0.0019960175,0.00003181565,0.000029316856,0.0008871894,0.0000044545,0.0056267106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945344,0.00086231076,0.00006383992,0.00023496516,0.000009100784,0.000011156428,0.00044461671,0.0000023929936,0.0038372832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984042,0.00010953303,0.000028228984,0.00007665892,0.00057696603,0.0008044271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981743,0.00014272014,0.0002731417,0.0000419374,0.0007786056,0.00058940175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061826716,0.00019661653,0.00047098708,0.0010612801,0.0045942366,0.001242421,0.0008916126,0.000584037,0.0038322632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035191819,0.00016677503,0.00034886974,0.0027339256,0.001067256,0.00028162778,0.0011397233,0.0008185948,0.00019861248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001117329,0.0007215848,0.8621745,0.00020257109,0.00018487612,0.000552864,0.012168961,0.0034197667,0.0017854074,0.0083994055,0.0128881,0.09638465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034004755,0.00009619536,0.98296446,0.000046386398,0.000030816485,0.000032081316,0.008750472,0.00056968303,0.00025059658,0.00024275872,0.0069628027,0.000019849596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99650097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99826616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062087268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062087268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056085296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45047677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551079243","doi":"10.3386/w20444","title":"Is the 'Quarter of Birth' Endogenous? Evidence From One Million Siblings in Taiwan","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Academia Sinica","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Demography; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.409652580922891,"score_gpt":0.48216947671322724,"score_spread":0.07251689579033627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551079243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99753296,0.00039704796,0.00014992744,0.00034659056,0.0000064632136,0.0000061005726,0.00079795736,0.0000026209825,0.0007603205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848384,0.00027668526,0.00008445073,0.00008678997,0.000007483394,0.000007997873,0.0006603329,0.0000021614726,0.0003903207],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987984,0.00050595735,0.0001350933,0.00022719656,0.00014570424,0.00018762647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99090296,0.0026245532,0.0038879656,0.0012497898,0.0006633502,0.0006713796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023996662,0.00014487938,0.0002537639,0.00082186307,0.00049612246,0.00071831344,0.0007108858,0.0004949647,0.0022047248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009131736,0.0002365297,0.00044987345,0.001646777,0.0004950117,0.0004795721,0.0012065293,0.00059933274,0.0002760784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041984917,0.0000176733,0.9959611,0.000013135098,0.00006092921,0.00015006069,0.0007092443,0.00004618711,0.000043218097,0.00022086267,0.00028614947,0.0024493372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000077538,0.000030666844,0.99624854,0.000032557728,0.00006734142,0.00014727851,0.0019962082,0.00021690842,0.0001340926,0.00017523047,0.00093804,0.0000055854603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07205892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075904205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07205892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006054657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006954395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14327896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551349177","doi":"10.7202/010137ar","title":"Les aspirations de fécondité des étudiants et étudiantes de l’Université de Sherbrooke","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.02129674131413403,"score_gpt":0.2503734833197866,"score_spread":0.22907674200565256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551349177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970131,0.0003571777,0.00013157609,0.00038067647,0.0000061611304,0.000008975332,0.00014451248,0.0000056405493,0.0019521106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98679787,0.00057201134,0.00026179088,0.00013003388,0.000006386669,0.000021382231,0.00014725527,0.000005202858,0.012058066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983203,0.00027415826,0.000067015855,0.00012742286,0.00046387405,0.0007472336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962955,0.0006283199,0.00055834284,0.00006560869,0.00094649807,0.0015057963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014163825,0.00025880884,0.0002801872,0.0017270049,0.0043101264,0.0021695225,0.0004591643,0.0006146026,0.004630103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004601054,0.00037578592,0.00026524218,0.0014632341,0.0011453775,0.0006879472,0.0008820443,0.0009717442,0.0009579449],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014139121,0.00013011998,0.9162196,0.00004177185,0.000013856954,0.0005851514,0.048671834,0.00017812537,0.0019391213,0.0016919634,0.0014114473,0.02897573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008937922,0.0001846826,0.932183,0.000049347025,0.000007187797,0.00044797378,0.04608175,0.0002730463,0.0011692243,0.00012540375,0.019410243,0.000059080372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76215893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.850918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23784107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012739687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006798195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4784835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551735044","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1815910","title":"Discrimination in the Provision of Social Services to the Poor: A Field Experimental Study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Business; Public economics; Psychology; Actuarial science; Political science; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01775839027057892,"score_gpt":0.31250922607613074,"score_spread":0.29475083580555184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551735044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99901116,0.000010057431,0.000051110103,0.000077285535,0.000010264328,0.00015251953,0.000014657205,0.0000011499027,0.00067183573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981359,0.000046365145,0.00032759865,0.00023245781,0.00002016827,0.00036405076,0.00002004767,0.0000019497588,0.0008514842],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99280715,0.0048967088,0.00020372824,0.0004781703,0.0005434411,0.0010708258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800797,0.013933752,0.0019434179,0.0016355906,0.0006556347,0.001751865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00904309,0.00069540704,0.0008353052,0.0014711154,0.0070224074,0.0022110802,0.001540446,0.0030304804,0.0069986475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01904137,0.0010341973,0.0005958416,0.0010307104,0.007646746,0.0019798167,0.0022396422,0.0026974638,0.0005279044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03257172,0.69992393,0.12026899,0.00046907002,0.000102212616,0.0011870228,0.08752683,0.0010679954,0.012116896,0.007468179,0.0019093555,0.03538772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019528938,0.3933842,0.28531143,0.00040366902,0.0003327757,0.0010079886,0.2718775,0.0042504715,0.0066306125,0.010183472,0.0068169488,0.0002719649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011635187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01687722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011635187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021634293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004034399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04782498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552179849","doi":"","title":"Why Did Employment and Earnings Rise Among Lone Mothers During the 1980s and 1990s","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Quarter (Canadian coin); Baby boom; Demographic economics; Boom; Economics; Maturity (psychological); Population; Labour economics; Demography; Psychology; Geography; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03838986031316142,"score_gpt":0.34218484214263045,"score_spread":0.303794981829469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552179849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99054927,0.001190007,0.000020993464,0.0049467366,0.000046382287,0.0000030665694,0.0002459419,0.0000025711,0.0029949613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975193,0.0008263697,0.000016853888,0.0004039132,0.00006668003,0.0000038924823,0.00012663909,0.00000265083,0.0010335473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976856,0.000020977479,0.000006577468,0.000037191534,0.000023471133,0.0001432699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925154,0.00012392363,0.00023809577,0.000025512723,0.0001097779,0.0002510676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083930994,0.00008634817,0.0002051074,0.0008802405,0.0007584329,0.00088335975,0.00029113237,0.0007838043,0.0038611144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025367527,0.00015116224,0.00015702368,0.00068707316,0.0005893683,0.0010675712,0.00051499734,0.0006229898,0.00047175412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002230579,0.000066436136,0.9593145,0.00003456754,0.000021739417,0.00033303112,0.005504376,0.00006559372,0.00055661506,0.002486275,0.004047291,0.02734654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008315486,0.000029593382,0.99023914,0.00004713044,0.00000610818,0.000067720866,0.0051020263,0.000042648862,0.00009194206,0.00032613738,0.004035546,0.0000036493407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047540206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09453848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047540206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012010192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066427607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094527006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554322207","doi":"10.3138/cpp.34.1.025","title":"An Evaluation of the Working Income Tax Benefit","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Economics; Subsidy; Unemployment; Labour economics; State income tax; Income tax; Government (linguistics); Welfare; Gross income; Structural unemployment; Tax credit; Population; Tax reform; Public economics; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.06713966415149354,"score_gpt":0.31157815022459817,"score_spread":0.24443848607310464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554322207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21042438,0.010866478,0.0017894594,0.06607704,0.0021876208,0.0026402446,0.0032489565,0.00015333429,0.70261246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93449205,0.0042410376,0.0016209591,0.012157622,0.00059697154,0.0006260902,0.0007775526,0.00005731096,0.045430344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9533881,0.014889188,0.0010435294,0.0010282635,0.024508601,0.005142269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95551014,0.022635149,0.0014174893,0.00134151,0.015322979,0.0037728278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030501474,0.00062904926,0.00090267457,0.0033342976,0.0051443847,0.0063595916,0.0024167488,0.004480021,0.017119102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07206452,0.00035633193,0.0012061255,0.0033767296,0.0035673857,0.003070174,0.0023078125,0.004973878,0.00076308317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012370099,0.004269924,0.025523668,0.0012170054,0.0005246024,0.000332838,0.0032328556,0.0061441036,0.0007563978,0.5364117,0.1596129,0.2496039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011587772,0.010269281,0.13131945,0.0030443796,0.0031523486,0.00019517772,0.013881052,0.012806865,0.0048625576,0.043356597,0.7650783,0.00044624484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58977073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63211846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94691926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05308071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.079869345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8252904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554595211","doi":"","title":"Family spending power","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Clothing; Pooling; Scale (ratio); Demographic economics; Engel curve; Standard of living; Sibling; Per capita income; Economies of scale; Labour economics; Public economics; Geography; Sociology; Microeconomics; Demography","score_opus":0.06136650512543573,"score_gpt":0.3469982909045776,"score_spread":0.2856317857791419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554595211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14937112,0.0033471892,0.0023471438,0.05744875,0.00049389125,0.00002382668,0.0011443632,0.000041861258,0.7857818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9391557,0.0020687154,0.0003186187,0.002349598,0.00031595337,0.000030222993,0.0003680086,0.0000249139,0.05536837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959797,0.00009155415,0.000008611727,0.00006290625,0.00004876671,0.00019026047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935466,0.00012459689,0.00010058755,0.000065204484,0.00009328449,0.00026165476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004994151,0.00028917522,0.0003474591,0.0007351769,0.0015355576,0.0024810478,0.00034037823,0.0008164171,0.048432812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022933248,0.000090874295,0.00022044635,0.00090074656,0.0017385812,0.0030487855,0.0014804553,0.0008277707,0.0025369725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006152375,0.000072194576,0.027172197,0.000056822402,0.000050645376,0.00060850166,0.006116735,0.00046360932,0.00020827711,0.81360364,0.05629307,0.09529288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024396904,0.0000720026,0.060575195,0.00042247545,0.00002899305,0.000960487,0.020710187,0.00044912982,0.00023158579,0.28877905,0.62771195,0.000034636327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008309548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008710227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048432812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015103868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060104684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16202384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555634732","doi":"10.7202/602157ar","title":"Comportements de fécondité des Québécoises, allocations familiales et impôts : résultats et simulations d’un modèle de choix discrets portant sur les années 1975-1987","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09033368590207339,"score_gpt":0.3112641227606208,"score_spread":0.22093043685854744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555634732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853587,0.00033139501,0.0074178823,0.0005187072,0.000024209967,0.000091522605,0.0014932894,0.00005304672,0.0047112093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98409307,0.00025642835,0.005676987,0.00008737399,0.000008652937,0.00020060374,0.0014969948,0.000024161445,0.008155687],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923885,0.00037171246,0.000022173761,0.00012048257,0.000048437814,0.00019836106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98986024,0.008176559,0.00056537765,0.00029622755,0.00066997565,0.00043160372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036737046,0.00079074636,0.0015403301,0.0008399052,0.0014128118,0.0018954038,0.0018547411,0.0020178105,0.008033328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0097633125,0.00090160436,0.0014256007,0.0014211817,0.001734776,0.0013075287,0.0008342023,0.0023618506,0.00038891885],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019257212,0.00007296962,0.012836599,0.000028309574,0.000064222026,0.00009222219,0.00013944737,0.98133713,0.00007667862,0.00285456,0.00042219917,0.0018831376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015701892,0.00010929536,0.009609026,0.00003638781,0.00008117782,0.000017828643,0.00059964525,0.9859656,0.00020878243,0.0022726113,0.00091125304,0.000031459655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6823766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57869333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31762338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008274947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058171656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63898784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557459808","doi":"","title":"Acces a un regime de pension et taux de remplacement des gains chez les couples canadiens","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06986376841623873,"score_gpt":0.35496575533329217,"score_spread":0.28510198691705346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557459808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853194,0.0045192456,0.00052666327,0.00039444523,0.000026676978,0.000026569072,0.0018127417,0.000013938328,0.007360308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99181706,0.0026930554,0.00033421535,0.000080093974,0.00002876821,0.00007375065,0.0012382368,0.0000045279708,0.003730247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979753,0.0005543667,0.00012852291,0.0003135972,0.00055228197,0.0004760174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99260724,0.0032667997,0.0020687985,0.00060887594,0.0010225172,0.0004258368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036050705,0.00028429047,0.00054715556,0.0038149941,0.0016553198,0.0017025798,0.00052472664,0.0008271833,0.0060074213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017667662,0.00022640222,0.00054926635,0.005875253,0.000728546,0.0010330003,0.0013736534,0.0008390117,0.0007477874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005570368,0.00008081212,0.9215544,0.00015484655,0.00019198596,0.0002677594,0.00895594,0.0007324509,0.00039443563,0.0017396215,0.0007561101,0.064614564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014935813,0.00017852787,0.98758,0.0001024222,0.000056112298,0.00023974503,0.0038995873,0.00011732868,0.00018561854,0.000566742,0.0070327027,0.000026199723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11997094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10176857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8800291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026260754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001889901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2385453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1559574347","doi":"10.1108/s0731-9053(2013)0000032010","title":"The Collective Marriage Matching Model: Identification, Estimation, and Testing","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Marriage market; Economics; Identification (biology); Estimation; Econometrics; Labour economics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03407538024408464,"score_gpt":0.27276742526766257,"score_spread":0.23869204502357794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1559574347","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.343956,0.00093865657,0.629925,0.002097,0.000081978855,0.00013862477,0.00075659394,0.00032082218,0.02178536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91648537,0.00058319804,0.070649944,0.00018650992,0.000084284635,0.00024369315,0.0010293918,0.000060008915,0.010677702],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862635,0.0009169814,0.000032392705,0.00015351725,0.00019022498,0.00008052689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938308,0.004668909,0.0006439878,0.0004674101,0.0002646641,0.00012417292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004921116,0.00039459893,0.0009834653,0.0007879006,0.0004296127,0.0010692084,0.0017535565,0.0010470285,0.009777725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014352334,0.00033837243,0.00065584324,0.0015154508,0.00080243143,0.0014577897,0.0015409163,0.0013383764,0.0009577095],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012106952,0.00037540623,0.056165062,0.00020788764,0.00024038409,0.00036487312,0.00084315863,0.40482044,0.0005307212,0.34530166,0.012576736,0.1784527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000348641,0.000058457645,0.0052097617,0.000050364088,0.00003140285,0.00006905509,0.00023109578,0.8550995,0.00027095838,0.13536988,0.003557568,0.000017058705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005515532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00508077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009777725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084705226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001102231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032709777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1559817281","doi":"","title":"Taxing Choices: The Intersection of Class, Gender, Parenthood and the Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intersection (aeronautics); Class (philosophy); Sociology; Gender studies; Geography; Epistemology; Philosophy; Cartography","score_opus":0.02977518160929328,"score_gpt":0.2687732984450842,"score_spread":0.23899811683579092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1559817281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78796107,0.0063073765,0.0006416964,0.022096049,0.000094294795,0.000029516992,0.00047829977,0.000009787276,0.18238203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920582,0.0014310528,0.0000941386,0.0002765012,0.000008970291,0.0000052794103,0.000036660633,0.0000044021526,0.0060847504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980476,0.00046954956,0.000025262858,0.00008888032,0.00047378096,0.0008950284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981293,0.00068322045,0.00020942754,0.000099433826,0.00046248586,0.00041614266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017594377,0.00015444082,0.00034818542,0.0022089186,0.013891592,0.006264212,0.0012093708,0.0010459397,0.0066430634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047264467,0.00017424968,0.00020246467,0.005471903,0.014095849,0.0026057444,0.0017209182,0.0017019802,0.0001478809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008535432,0.00012640598,0.08172519,0.00007142858,0.000026260044,0.00021061588,0.1314515,0.0005134032,0.00018053265,0.7283184,0.013237662,0.04405326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002325017,0.000042650176,0.27242184,0.0005076287,0.00004996936,0.00014862543,0.46327344,0.00074712787,0.00032109188,0.06335847,0.19904083,0.00006506601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9795852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9795852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041290823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055400018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29958725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561632678","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.923633","title":"A Study of Effective Marginal Tax Rates in Quebec (Une Analyse des Taux Marginaux Effectifs d'Imposition au Quebec)","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Microsimulation; Economics; Redistribution (election); Demographic economics; Population; Labour economics; Political science; Demography","score_opus":0.007417087636555246,"score_gpt":0.269356234162359,"score_spread":0.26193914652580375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561632678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937609,0.0007142941,0.00034284007,0.00033325993,0.0000069777075,0.000024489142,0.00080598285,0.00001120424,0.0039999452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963257,0.00020407526,0.0002495187,0.00004301344,0.0000028437537,0.000012719321,0.00027764426,0.000005149913,0.0028793693],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990664,0.00032061164,0.000028216207,0.00012074691,0.00018299758,0.00028092175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99594826,0.001542142,0.00064087956,0.00016180592,0.0011872159,0.0005196541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013864336,0.0002465058,0.00048650274,0.001099041,0.0020252177,0.0020686176,0.0011097266,0.00054302486,0.0061405217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00516777,0.00022613425,0.00044054267,0.0028470326,0.0013453189,0.0007017105,0.0006471457,0.0007957925,0.00024091903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012816257,0.0005531129,0.8839812,0.00017874439,0.00057078624,0.0005675601,0.0072228257,0.01875611,0.0021038242,0.025331942,0.0056131175,0.053839076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024383033,0.000084782005,0.99031126,0.00003451523,0.00005140641,0.00003127176,0.002338667,0.0030787084,0.00023413819,0.000270129,0.0035208508,0.000019879264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9873719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99144286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04377568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04377568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013778637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31761628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565186932","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.00500.x","title":"Does the labour supply of wives respond to husbands' wages? Canadian evidence from micro data and grouped data","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Ordinary least squares; Wage; Estimator; Econometrics; Labour economics; Wage dispersion; Yield (engineering); Labour supply; Demographic economics; Efficiency wage; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1981744200715964,"score_gpt":0.24012686183674126,"score_spread":0.04195244176514484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565186932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97052664,0.0032937722,0.001573729,0.0018400959,0.000039452992,0.000050291557,0.00958185,0.000028791983,0.013065417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99421173,0.0010802058,0.0006971061,0.00017288006,0.000010246971,0.000015894933,0.0022117316,0.00000887656,0.0015913197],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969111,0.000586889,0.00016712735,0.0005151554,0.0013250582,0.0004946991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851421,0.003634203,0.0036915883,0.0016830037,0.005196534,0.00065259903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003532061,0.00034493097,0.0005386437,0.002633483,0.0018877516,0.0014828608,0.001174156,0.0004265298,0.004014735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018716075,0.00036017175,0.00053109945,0.009370371,0.0012113658,0.00058127276,0.0011421671,0.0005234915,0.00030227605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013888105,0.000024150231,0.9656475,0.00014199146,0.0004826501,0.00008871416,0.003271786,0.00074105896,0.00024081755,0.0022493121,0.0031867095,0.023786483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062706886,0.000011195642,0.9927654,0.000062518644,0.00007809846,0.00001659759,0.001758451,0.0004610988,0.00015004323,0.00035700304,0.004312861,0.000020429741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98905456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010945439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009609003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009575919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06971848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565351187","doi":"","title":"Driven Apart: Women's Employment Equality and Child Care in Canadian Public Policy . Annis May Timpson.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Public policy; Gender equality; Political science; Care work; Parental leave; Economic growth; Labour economics; Gender studies; Economics; Sociology; Work (physics); Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.020377095130295265,"score_gpt":0.2948731280002518,"score_spread":0.2744960328699565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565351187","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014751985,0.22455437,0.0002233806,0.65173745,0.0031105357,0.000031624346,0.0005654163,0.000022508153,0.10500268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48732105,0.24123707,0.0008920341,0.053653285,0.0017249304,0.0000814345,0.0003607613,0.00007750173,0.214652],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983631,0.00033680678,0.000038192968,0.00008889689,0.0005005072,0.00067252165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981511,0.0004827136,0.00008763956,0.00003192473,0.00065504084,0.0005914674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024607715,0.0005746281,0.00048395008,0.001829279,0.021984642,0.005121053,0.0017778879,0.0038094635,0.013100559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046175495,0.00044478633,0.00031384616,0.004709385,0.0065153777,0.0032616246,0.0025817316,0.004112614,0.00053487765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004658544,0.00005717301,0.0055199577,0.00030658173,0.00001608559,0.00032555533,0.035240635,0.0002527292,0.00016224521,0.14503612,0.7098083,0.10322801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000151457525,0.000016168888,0.034435607,0.0014818831,0.00003282978,0.000116331976,0.0944709,0.00024281463,0.00018245369,0.015926253,0.8530143,0.00006537293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9905434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99788314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06778151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06778151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11626092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49179155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566433786","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-4085.2005.00267.x","title":"Pensions and Fertility Incentives","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; Pension; Incentive; Labour supply; Labour economics; Overlapping generations model; Microeconomics; Finance; Population; Medicine","score_opus":0.1404992784350386,"score_gpt":0.22383599443996693,"score_spread":0.08333671600492834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566433786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8177416,0.0064680777,0.0026571811,0.030302221,0.00021490813,0.00007504045,0.0015680396,0.000046588346,0.14092635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986537,0.00091484224,0.00013923772,0.0002695472,0.00008336576,0.00000791008,0.000061456165,0.0000033489237,0.011983182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992536,0.00020639675,0.00003248252,0.0000581934,0.00010412016,0.00034513933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568874,0.00184623,0.0010673228,0.00017049442,0.00034305372,0.00088420016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025159614,0.00013459279,0.00040527002,0.0009543252,0.0011357085,0.0018910456,0.00033837097,0.0017770046,0.016766975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010871236,0.00019393447,0.0002330983,0.0006659025,0.0010693653,0.0010734485,0.0008787991,0.0011652901,0.0006564135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006228838,0.00038198818,0.13140135,0.00008963237,0.000073924326,0.00045312152,0.0018135693,0.005214198,0.0007498445,0.78897643,0.011862102,0.05836094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026960886,0.00030302219,0.27626854,0.00018875785,0.00012207037,0.00071444927,0.0037746225,0.007588472,0.00066577236,0.6304053,0.079626486,0.00007289752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014493537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03039216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016766975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022150562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026920906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05609107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568009433","doi":"","title":"Female Employment Rates and Labour Market Attachment in Rural Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Labour economics; Economics; Rural area; Demographic economics; Market segmentation; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.030084579849833478,"score_gpt":0.33438197120145285,"score_spread":0.3042973913516194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568009433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98768324,0.00070166076,0.000059804115,0.001466071,0.000022838352,0.000014387974,0.0030032792,0.0000087081335,0.0070400746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908886,0.0005056474,0.000048451468,0.00006905941,0.000009012841,0.00000622637,0.00070948096,0.0000066648954,0.007756998],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906486,0.000065495646,0.000030782558,0.00008920218,0.00023494069,0.00051479996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639183,0.00032325386,0.0005903394,0.00009375349,0.0010076943,0.0015930502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007876104,0.00021198357,0.00035288322,0.0022211538,0.004323501,0.0015952808,0.00089575467,0.00046272264,0.012388889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004110142,0.00023185261,0.0003377596,0.004066552,0.00095954386,0.0004541369,0.0010908264,0.0009572415,0.00059541245],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001263881,0.000054756045,0.97733945,0.000029292283,0.000027262016,0.00017611426,0.0043753064,0.00025863454,0.00014267079,0.0017542943,0.0046105348,0.011105249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006636539,0.000017433402,0.98967427,0.000037689777,0.000010043473,0.000053628853,0.0063411,0.00035014589,0.000053305677,0.00017140657,0.003268983,0.000015378382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020812923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020812923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023425667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15100902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568015471","doi":"","title":"Emploi des meres canadiennes apres la naissance d'un enfant et trajectoires des gains de leurs homologues occupees de facon continue, 1983 a 2004","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.07826174287844168,"score_gpt":0.34987180140366075,"score_spread":0.2716100585252191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568015471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929007,0.0008560803,0.00014779324,0.00017568651,0.000023768467,0.000029703673,0.0015193167,0.000006358882,0.0043404587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741382,0.0020161225,0.00053801015,0.0001074249,0.0000290806,0.00019514156,0.0026314848,0.00000821691,0.020336227],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917066,0.00010511137,0.000038763945,0.00018486225,0.0002275185,0.00027320397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748707,0.00036068453,0.0005907877,0.0001488688,0.0008558108,0.0005567754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012785895,0.00037332342,0.0004253912,0.002002686,0.0019238356,0.0012853121,0.0007817463,0.0006821485,0.00579152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044349944,0.00031898485,0.0004898709,0.002512877,0.000589286,0.00077732786,0.0016124354,0.00068480836,0.0011289094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019635605,0.000063102205,0.9459802,0.00017820664,0.00009892073,0.00035242122,0.024213415,0.00015669761,0.00083224254,0.00045112777,0.0012734416,0.02620399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016692777,0.0000764109,0.9845548,0.000087423905,0.000020370515,0.00005962549,0.0105762165,0.000025935884,0.000075561744,0.000033781507,0.004477317,0.000010661479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37247977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6275202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024305196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00442833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74062335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568025745","doi":"10.1111/caje.12409","title":"Child cash benefits and family expenditures: Evidence from the National Child Benefit","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Exploit; Cash; Public economics; Demographic economics; Income Support; Earned income tax credit; Economics; Child health; Household income; Low income; Labour economics; Business; Tax credit; Finance; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.0965982074450081,"score_gpt":0.21180414901836048,"score_spread":0.11520594157335237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568025745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9302973,0.030705027,0.00027556537,0.004889962,0.00006800568,0.00006723364,0.00968811,0.0000111055815,0.023997646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98894334,0.0075594177,0.0001427046,0.00023138714,0.0000224613,0.0000144102605,0.001406588,0.000004493567,0.0016750619],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984977,0.00038749416,0.00007014448,0.00014973737,0.0005535489,0.0003414368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838705,0.0063621057,0.0044603604,0.00067292555,0.0031302702,0.0015037905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026319432,0.0002617208,0.00043698394,0.0015700452,0.00096374383,0.0010652097,0.0008751846,0.00043170972,0.007819554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015272727,0.00016705958,0.00068632775,0.0031072162,0.0009990927,0.00033287265,0.0009391539,0.00073772273,0.00018594365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071187963,0.00010180549,0.9674337,0.00030689224,0.00062302675,0.00014580794,0.0005147262,0.00040748264,0.00004474184,0.0018302914,0.0029047497,0.024974965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022056278,0.00003539836,0.99492896,0.00024513615,0.00035099298,0.000032958233,0.00046227642,0.00013177899,0.00004843211,0.00021055652,0.0035242687,0.0000071326263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9200105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.937799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07998949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007625167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012054818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1609211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568084423","doi":"10.7202/1121109ar","title":"Big Sister: How Extreme Feminism has Betrayed the Fight for Sexual Equality. Neil Boyd","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Sister; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2339216077805318,"score_gpt":0.4066482272250617,"score_spread":0.1727266194445299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568084423","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059691365,0.04645371,0.000273434,0.8699861,0.014444028,0.000013916163,0.00004471352,0.000038169746,0.06277672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1912454,0.040501934,0.00054850953,0.55021834,0.0075853034,0.00009416711,0.000043678825,0.00024725217,0.20951536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974401,0.0014677388,0.000043662447,0.00023694268,0.00037960373,0.00043185402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99626774,0.0019753904,0.00021021786,0.00013718617,0.0005124357,0.0008970128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004528623,0.00056760455,0.00064887706,0.00051952666,0.02750086,0.0074128034,0.0015601522,0.007721167,0.009273076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010030035,0.00050483254,0.0002618341,0.0005359874,0.01475715,0.008981587,0.0054676253,0.01997434,0.0017486247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004546885,0.000026403588,0.00035199983,0.00006464251,0.0000071938603,0.00036115333,0.036976803,0.000027558795,0.00006825149,0.08310647,0.863468,0.015495992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014645297,0.000025764504,0.0006200541,0.00038873852,0.0000070945493,0.00036944158,0.060491305,0.000053691896,0.0001949134,0.014716514,0.92308503,0.000032881915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04169873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.115418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04169873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040856786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043662735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08291203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568730581","doi":"","title":"\"And We Still Ain't Satisfied\": A Report on Gender and Income Inequality in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journals @ The Mount (Mount Saint Vincent University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Poverty; Inequality; Gender gap; Wage; Economics; Labour economics; Cohort; Demography; Sociology; Economic growth; Medicine","score_opus":0.028432376599061164,"score_gpt":0.2531739720896766,"score_spread":0.22474159549061545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568730581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84296376,0.027241156,0.00031250945,0.016415391,0.00059763924,0.00036333827,0.05351966,0.000098185345,0.058488343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93035716,0.028242724,0.0005907179,0.003231542,0.00010490754,0.00017411666,0.011798145,0.00006116916,0.025439423],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796045,0.00006282445,0.000093546776,0.0001147929,0.0010482444,0.00072025886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967982,0.00012162116,0.00027890306,0.00003677858,0.0018699226,0.00089462474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097467605,0.00039223654,0.0005467286,0.0040697088,0.009540452,0.002941354,0.0011178688,0.0005885889,0.005118355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024498573,0.0003469928,0.00059806457,0.013707684,0.0010672407,0.00072834326,0.0017923173,0.001136734,0.00048857124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014716905,0.00012690564,0.7956716,0.0007389814,0.000101417776,0.00078960555,0.019668207,0.00014370422,0.00032962652,0.0015707032,0.09876403,0.08194808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008340804,0.000028896984,0.9206726,0.00034449637,0.000039390623,0.00021570771,0.021433791,0.0001164664,0.00014343028,0.0000840961,0.056862336,0.000050407038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05216476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05216476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13976032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3784836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570951878","doi":"10.7202/602030ar","title":"L’incidence du salaire minimum sur le marché du travail des adolescents au Canada : une reconsidération des résultats empiriques","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.03641161441970515,"score_gpt":0.24794000221553997,"score_spread":0.21152838779583483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570951878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9510545,0.008338177,0.004804177,0.009419385,0.00011287158,0.00014505608,0.0057723904,0.0000746763,0.020278651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889109,0.0022210234,0.0016513565,0.0005630043,0.000034471683,0.00004567283,0.0011648816,0.00002458956,0.005384142],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721044,0.00101474,0.00014448099,0.0003475458,0.0006301637,0.00065271877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98298776,0.0105243465,0.002139405,0.00070295384,0.0029363036,0.0007092457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00688941,0.0005468175,0.0010969004,0.0013872201,0.0017568407,0.002317158,0.0018142305,0.0005914642,0.0059823315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017186645,0.00037361748,0.0017005615,0.0024729595,0.0020109238,0.0009544884,0.001274265,0.001250076,0.0002943944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025299698,0.00003811332,0.9683889,0.00029475926,0.0007039117,0.00011483286,0.0016064391,0.005681128,0.00014977,0.006249923,0.0025215175,0.013997648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006762178,0.00013002483,0.9645925,0.0005342066,0.00096679654,0.000036498357,0.0045063784,0.014164007,0.00063129934,0.0021379036,0.012174661,0.000058087626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98400784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9834804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016186105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016186105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035258062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11743897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571050306","doi":"","title":"Social Assistance Use in Canada: National and Provincial Trends in Incidence, Entry and Exit","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Welfare; Demographic economics; Legislation; Longitudinal data; Incidence (geometry); Geography; Socioeconomics; Demography; Economic growth; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04315603686805511,"score_gpt":0.32786714258573263,"score_spread":0.28471110571767755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571050306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97192466,0.0012558915,0.00016314264,0.0011341885,0.000016109509,0.000047308808,0.02055545,0.00006193785,0.0048411777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98557425,0.001043458,0.00021151194,0.00011788805,0.0000077048735,0.000022133383,0.008419492,0.000023203373,0.0045802253],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981335,0.00008161736,0.00009079262,0.00020731466,0.00059012114,0.00089661503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932342,0.00031513418,0.0012446836,0.00020173319,0.0032694028,0.0017348339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084504805,0.00037871822,0.0006456548,0.0042841807,0.0036021275,0.0024931724,0.0017641129,0.0005901598,0.003309886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037212349,0.00043167718,0.00097512285,0.00920981,0.001386734,0.00079612056,0.0023237716,0.0012170242,0.0004844264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014792639,0.00003955438,0.97907764,0.00005920942,0.00005167658,0.00009309044,0.0028590048,0.00028251708,0.00021617462,0.000532645,0.0038968043,0.012743798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040268055,0.000014371435,0.99507564,0.00003825985,0.00001047778,0.000042315634,0.0022802206,0.00029380748,0.000080399506,0.00003138561,0.0021118044,0.000017178438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99840397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040062577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040062577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047203086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2906757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571269868","doi":"10.3138/cpp.35.3.344","title":"An Analysis of Effective Marginal Tax Rates in Quebec","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Microsimulation; Economics; Redistribution (election); Demographic economics; Population; Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Distribution (mathematics); Income tax; Public economics; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.01142879832494894,"score_gpt":0.29519900672041416,"score_spread":0.28377020839546524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571269868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95161897,0.000994297,0.004932999,0.0011954707,0.000023516464,0.00007477224,0.007503883,0.00015409588,0.033502065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99290764,0.00017273895,0.00082448206,0.000043737768,0.000003657692,0.00001429996,0.001330934,0.00001852007,0.0046840594],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993167,0.00015909929,0.00001787104,0.000073588904,0.00017174557,0.00026093962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977831,0.0004605797,0.00021331698,0.00013746352,0.0012677767,0.00013778481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009919041,0.00023525825,0.00034771787,0.0014427946,0.0008718461,0.0016033899,0.0009806803,0.00035066035,0.0062766382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004478203,0.00018882572,0.0004194955,0.0020594462,0.00040183536,0.00044148412,0.0003375708,0.000510193,0.00023114673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025149412,0.00010192274,0.34308705,0.0001020089,0.00033378092,0.00049159705,0.0008197482,0.45847315,0.0013367595,0.12722622,0.018795159,0.04898116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028926099,0.000040209503,0.4764476,0.00006639739,0.00005499448,0.00009968048,0.0008154762,0.49523112,0.000520547,0.0040896246,0.022527887,0.0000775023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.983328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97358274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041435193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041435193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008694078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3006348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572508825","doi":"10.3386/w11932","title":"The Long-Term Effects of a Generous Income Support Program: Unemployment Insurance in New Brunswick and Maine, 1940-1991","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Term (time); Income Support; Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Actuarial science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.1156473215443705,"score_gpt":0.455380346080361,"score_spread":0.33973302453599047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572508825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879673,0.0013765936,0.000069114365,0.001080862,0.000027412494,0.000023579023,0.007798496,0.00000855265,0.0016479952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870775,0.0012271045,0.00008960465,0.00022756697,0.000022102504,0.000040073297,0.0070554474,0.000006272423,0.0042543113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935836,0.00009731499,0.000050387313,0.00007697434,0.000103864695,0.00031308355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969151,0.00033013933,0.001328125,0.00010301211,0.0005970832,0.00072650425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008292719,0.00026545773,0.0003938113,0.001473884,0.001076472,0.0011054239,0.0013646693,0.00051074085,0.0016574094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026024885,0.00022382702,0.0004547195,0.0026318454,0.0008306084,0.0005256597,0.0016137179,0.00089263474,0.00031239088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012467372,0.00007872686,0.9897217,0.000038145048,0.00011229612,0.00018514147,0.0009457035,0.0003998587,0.00023082114,0.00032239215,0.0023934024,0.00544707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001275205,0.00003071599,0.9951261,0.00003329299,0.00005931733,0.000027690341,0.0015058238,0.00018897592,0.00014543015,0.000028790651,0.002833108,0.000007986136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9471022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98211217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05289781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01527105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007816303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11079979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572831179","doi":"10.3982/qe353","title":"Altruistically motivated transfers under uncertainty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Consumption (sociology); Microeconomics; Incentive; Markov perfect equilibrium; Limit (mathematics); Nash equilibrium; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03971910181425162,"score_gpt":0.3009847565784082,"score_spread":0.26126565476415653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572831179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90499717,0.00024980048,0.049755853,0.0036783887,0.000020142263,0.000032650965,0.00012053532,0.00004571616,0.041099586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99776113,0.000051220974,0.0010180869,0.000051409927,0.0000055138466,0.000011531277,0.000007751086,0.0000030831336,0.0010902788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999283,0.00040597786,0.0000145278145,0.000096681695,0.00006554307,0.00013434693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749064,0.0012381579,0.000673316,0.00022451542,0.00013673806,0.00023671956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017569805,0.00018640218,0.00030948812,0.00033805516,0.00096886815,0.0014441402,0.00048852677,0.0009424255,0.0045420285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009446207,0.0001945976,0.00027019077,0.00025729305,0.001537573,0.0025111435,0.0009210303,0.0005837696,0.0002462319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016317474,0.00014199383,0.028358016,0.000055882974,0.00008101698,0.00070000073,0.0032717483,0.076473005,0.0019223504,0.8563648,0.0024188044,0.030049164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027587792,0.00007171216,0.011410514,0.000027700233,0.000021106209,0.00022099732,0.0022708005,0.10035037,0.00044870056,0.8816375,0.0034778921,0.000035087574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002203396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011656837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045420285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014642564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005244666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015194595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573748388","doi":"","title":"The Dynamics of US Labor Force Attachment","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Multinomial distribution; Duration (music); Current Population Survey; Estimation; Dynamics (music); Work (physics); Population; Demographic economics; Economics; Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Demography; Psychology; Sociology; Physics; Computer science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.027899715903762473,"score_gpt":0.34370956283320436,"score_spread":0.3158098469294419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573748388","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021152714,0.04446075,0.0035628409,0.5214452,0.018949809,0.00037878333,0.08356884,0.0003535838,0.30612746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4045043,0.06359069,0.010425768,0.03217444,0.006499376,0.0004354938,0.032024093,0.0005506128,0.4497953],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734867,0.0003178078,0.000121709905,0.0001748474,0.0016106309,0.00042626663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873374,0.001901273,0.00036297954,0.00048122669,0.008781266,0.0011358819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041050804,0.00042784066,0.0004615784,0.005052339,0.0036833547,0.002963191,0.0013929656,0.0018324875,0.052385397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017690899,0.00029483566,0.00048725042,0.010049754,0.0008968171,0.0015097103,0.0011126519,0.0018634036,0.0023716176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023186582,0.000012457782,0.0037976722,0.000053946827,0.000008415068,0.000044921067,0.00054259616,0.00016062507,0.000055297605,0.019642752,0.954277,0.021381035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010341873,0.0000057909506,0.040072937,0.00020274696,0.000010994808,0.000024420373,0.0011670213,0.0005483249,0.000081318765,0.0033793224,0.954443,0.00005390396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9548935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9723688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9548935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038137637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0338201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2767092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573998871","doi":"","title":"Health Concepts and Beliefs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Caribbean dialogue","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volatility (finance); Identity (music); Sociology; Social psychology; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.029311410863992176,"score_gpt":0.3158161236559929,"score_spread":0.2865047127920007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573998871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13605903,0.04452516,0.008619116,0.08388056,0.002242097,0.00025645396,0.0005448316,0.00006657586,0.72380614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355812,0.020983348,0.0038134044,0.014747841,0.00070916873,0.00019958222,0.0003006259,0.000018231962,0.02364655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893945,0.0004675578,0.000051841784,0.000089007444,0.00027476033,0.000177404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829227,0.0008718746,0.00020631426,0.00006991969,0.00031608657,0.00024355196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025554881,0.0002604232,0.00020498715,0.0018948916,0.0016072731,0.0027112425,0.00067107414,0.0014743198,0.008657349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004986867,0.000104664476,0.00022128026,0.0015597399,0.009020979,0.0019530775,0.0013615388,0.0023430856,0.00090101355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007378244,0.00019931633,0.018004268,0.0010646076,0.000036529655,0.0007085998,0.18134482,0.00034990947,0.00092279684,0.6111013,0.020732125,0.165462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030250503,0.00024346136,0.041136317,0.0031111059,0.000042055137,0.0013784452,0.16699009,0.00035117666,0.00048181703,0.26678538,0.51937217,0.00007776211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056494414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028338365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008657349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022359884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013505805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028961658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574322149","doi":"10.1787/5k4dlw9w6czq-en","title":"Fathers' Leave, Fathers' Involvement and Child Development","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"OECD social employment and migration working papers","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Science Foundation Ireland; York University","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology; Parental leave; Engineering; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.04236027702778706,"score_gpt":0.2881435796055626,"score_spread":0.24578330257777553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574322149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99655664,0.00065660855,0.00005973112,0.00007696606,0.00000500666,0.0000040503087,0.00045210065,0.0000019270356,0.0021870665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756,0.00060210493,0.00008405248,0.000015545418,0.0000049673063,0.0000071352274,0.00043833023,0.000001995442,0.0012857724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995962,0.00013003216,0.00002521856,0.00004244755,0.00009650185,0.00010956825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975452,0.0008287237,0.000996167,0.00006727119,0.0001503732,0.00041218623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008909463,0.00015806562,0.00023527755,0.0006056135,0.00050649664,0.00066503906,0.00022266673,0.00015323402,0.0031516638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022501228,0.00010967914,0.0002398039,0.0008850005,0.00030889385,0.00025251537,0.00075208466,0.00027549255,0.00022095519],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051203857,0.000038867158,0.99155325,0.00002677953,0.000028849481,0.00020579952,0.0020021775,0.000087779226,0.000082965875,0.0001588437,0.00026840167,0.0054949783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023521457,0.000026389991,0.9966864,0.00002177215,0.000007656736,0.00010448808,0.0019758719,0.000030461983,0.000047626774,0.000027713582,0.0010673321,0.00000200293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021979604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051597822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021979604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004148702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005342415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043703318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574459447","doi":"","title":"Models of Earning and Caring: Evidence from Canadian Time-Use Data","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Wife; Unpaid work; General partnership; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.20478352413120302,"score_gpt":0.3316097452969583,"score_spread":0.1268262211657553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574459447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87596995,0.021776678,0.0023262745,0.0050022905,0.00014187036,0.00029087512,0.048570916,0.00008830481,0.045832865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96366495,0.014593443,0.0019345272,0.00035043387,0.000020603844,0.00014466321,0.016208196,0.000046489968,0.0030366394],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932521,0.0012719494,0.0005699473,0.0007074163,0.0032242755,0.00097423256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94737226,0.012884094,0.010089971,0.0036622162,0.02309657,0.0028948684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010319149,0.00072876574,0.0008395427,0.0061259503,0.0054572322,0.003906788,0.003828639,0.00064335385,0.0058157784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050270554,0.0006562286,0.001458659,0.024026196,0.0023415089,0.0024305615,0.0035471944,0.0013054725,0.00052133953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001179607,0.00005490445,0.9337515,0.00045601657,0.00020614742,0.00007889829,0.0110508,0.0005010025,0.000023270453,0.004907482,0.011353901,0.037498012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012764378,0.000018703486,0.97327834,0.0005648171,0.0001020626,0.000051339684,0.009692194,0.00094537117,0.000039275266,0.00078692177,0.014439054,0.000069256945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99689746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052133802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052133802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06450337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37825894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575040464","doi":"10.3386/w10968","title":"The Integration of Child Tax Credits and Welfare: Evidence from the National Child Benefit Program","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Welfare; Tax credit; Economics; Public economics; Ad valorem tax; Tax reform; Business; Market economy","score_opus":0.17476976876157696,"score_gpt":0.455488760465018,"score_spread":0.28071899170344106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575040464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83845216,0.045693766,0.00037306332,0.025744162,0.00026601186,0.0004517318,0.0033872647,0.000017139615,0.08561477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96754426,0.023352413,0.0003114897,0.003538024,0.0001121933,0.00016329526,0.0012978471,0.000012049591,0.003668391],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880747,0.0049107745,0.0003919907,0.0005764652,0.003818999,0.0022269716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96715564,0.013413142,0.009549361,0.0011190044,0.00464713,0.0041157138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011170966,0.00033382955,0.0007939394,0.0024617538,0.0030465806,0.0028912548,0.001965782,0.0016134745,0.009368737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053473257,0.00039559894,0.00066303223,0.0066433684,0.0026939784,0.0019905753,0.0039892946,0.002828667,0.00031412425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003459855,0.0032859782,0.7263128,0.0016974183,0.0014317578,0.0004315316,0.011604158,0.00056725944,0.00011519372,0.02100885,0.022168241,0.20791689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000643572,0.00054140936,0.9357612,0.004190512,0.0012358545,0.00013557143,0.0125880195,0.0002297521,0.00019015753,0.001698029,0.042737387,0.0000485547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5915166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7438789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5915166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011298382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028079746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82177806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575757253","doi":"","title":"Is the Collective Model of Labor Supply Useful for Tax Policy Analysis? A Simulation Exercise","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Unitary state; Negotiation; Normative; Scope (computer science); Distribution (mathematics); Tax reform; Labour supply; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Public economics","score_opus":0.059673218625231735,"score_gpt":0.3733221725042137,"score_spread":0.31364895387898195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575757253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7278321,0.00028522784,0.17572083,0.0063116592,0.00012343253,0.00013635505,0.00089689996,0.00014316473,0.088550374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97860044,0.0001887968,0.0138073675,0.00014497628,0.000027556132,0.00013468323,0.00015404633,0.000028244225,0.0069138734],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956495,0.00027156583,0.0000103634375,0.000046783385,0.000039291324,0.0000670586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986399,0.000747518,0.0001461902,0.00024895818,0.00009356405,0.00012387897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012627605,0.00029649286,0.00068618095,0.00041474943,0.00067570276,0.0009135107,0.0008639066,0.0011230396,0.013185624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004869561,0.00019963032,0.0008256166,0.0006902513,0.0008555896,0.0016813811,0.0010167859,0.00082961406,0.00047806939],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011895181,0.00013818484,0.005784467,0.00003801181,0.00005213666,0.000111778136,0.00042291233,0.6967788,0.00027370203,0.2872872,0.0021505884,0.006843197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009056624,0.00008470726,0.0012012257,0.000019009349,0.000016549917,0.000033164815,0.00039201384,0.8470727,0.00011145724,0.1465479,0.004418407,0.000012302304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012437963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008637577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013185624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012493482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009871536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0441103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577064863","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01725.x","title":"A Perfect Storm? Welfare, Care, Gender and Generations in Uruguay","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Development and Change","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Ministry of Labour","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Economics; Redistribution (election); Welfare state; Poverty; Context (archaeology); Status quo; Welfare reform; Inequality; Asset (computer security); Labour economics; Development economics; Politics; Economic growth; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.09022291223805032,"score_gpt":0.26930837173542926,"score_spread":0.17908545949737895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577064863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95513076,0.011598078,0.000310603,0.018379776,0.00016643338,0.000029670848,0.00006508383,0.000009022943,0.014310484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928718,0.002396479,0.00023166779,0.001285304,0.00003935493,0.000039462226,0.000020402491,0.000007854774,0.0031075168],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799573,0.0011983722,0.00004782155,0.000099257944,0.00007750213,0.00058143906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992323,0.00021157596,0.00017179135,0.000026713346,0.00008745281,0.00027018046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024860378,0.00035748692,0.0006040757,0.0006670878,0.012682437,0.003480398,0.0011774242,0.0016345816,0.0028838096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022387272,0.00029448338,0.0003211508,0.0007867103,0.004529391,0.0028358637,0.005855801,0.0021213647,0.00016103275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015568847,0.00022062007,0.073008284,0.00019542799,0.000035960875,0.0047542793,0.79477876,0.00016094245,0.00064387295,0.087876625,0.0048743724,0.033295076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001955804,0.00036128762,0.13764545,0.0009231528,0.000054414224,0.0023782381,0.7478056,0.00052689953,0.00032333043,0.013217634,0.09666749,0.00007696664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2059076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2778821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2059076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010007376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031211802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4094181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577188326","doi":"","title":"An Empirical Investigation of Household Dynamics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Public economics; Public good; Economics; Public policy; Set (abstract data type); Demographic economics; Business; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.07470848648456518,"score_gpt":0.36312813319286746,"score_spread":0.2884196467083023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577188326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9598821,0.0009382702,0.0025710994,0.0007489072,0.000012957342,0.00016730167,0.019101525,0.000048635866,0.016529242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834608,0.0008782986,0.00214124,0.00010924751,0.000011357457,0.00007931281,0.008958949,0.000010420369,0.0043503135],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924123,0.00013308034,0.000032162563,0.00010187083,0.0003033127,0.00018834013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566287,0.0017403751,0.00096352806,0.00028510968,0.0010387261,0.00030946563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000893166,0.00020546521,0.00039592828,0.00365483,0.0011927924,0.0010523373,0.0007729598,0.00039944818,0.0064730104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008330699,0.0002100687,0.00028011054,0.009088622,0.0005030034,0.000856648,0.0006459327,0.000557605,0.00047315314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008817357,0.0002393428,0.8985283,0.00015958559,0.00010983701,0.00029416007,0.004064763,0.0070126187,0.0004962153,0.021258706,0.01108209,0.056666322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013200063,0.00003523103,0.95724887,0.00006320485,0.000025298517,0.0000867984,0.00626893,0.014940503,0.00032959366,0.001504523,0.019455666,0.00002819999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90558004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9170289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90558004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007241644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005984342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18995196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579189619","doi":"","title":"Québec's Childcare Universal Low Fees Policy 10 Years After: Effects, Costs and Benefits","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Demographic economics; Early childhood; Child care; Economics; Labour economics; Demography; Medicine; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Pediatrics; Sociology","score_opus":0.005285607496548043,"score_gpt":0.21684516258613556,"score_spread":0.21155955508958751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579189619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86864716,0.007614971,0.0008834389,0.024987288,0.00049939915,0.00066451525,0.02370152,0.00033477368,0.072666965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9385796,0.0014304655,0.00080166,0.0032490974,0.00008799472,0.00019346022,0.0032616726,0.000016069058,0.052379947],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766314,0.000606026,0.000045523175,0.0001467509,0.00050372,0.0010348515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99571925,0.0011655055,0.0005136542,0.00021938214,0.0012115265,0.0011707155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019086829,0.00042837296,0.0005610655,0.0005675448,0.0012713912,0.001991265,0.0015396725,0.0016955384,0.010611516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039314874,0.00016732726,0.0009149527,0.0010604786,0.0008120094,0.0004880232,0.00058572355,0.0012195319,0.0004930715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018269086,0.009512037,0.28296798,0.0020065326,0.001253022,0.003106347,0.0012718466,0.059297007,0.0069813044,0.04056749,0.2078681,0.3668993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025386964,0.0038790323,0.8746438,0.00051283045,0.00063384476,0.0002217791,0.002180069,0.012481788,0.0028007566,0.0011796512,0.09879211,0.00013566112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99083847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05633667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05633667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060798377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4087531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579946975","doi":"","title":"Using Cigarette Taxes When Smokers Are Heterogeneous: Evidence on Hyperbolic Preferences, Endogenous Preferences, Smoking, and Price Elasticity of Smoking in France","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Quit smoking; Price elasticity of demand; Economics; Social capital; Elasticity (physics); Population; Microeconomics; Smoking cessation; Environmental health; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.13574575941015163,"score_gpt":0.3476412234882992,"score_spread":0.21189546407814755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579946975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969613,0.00024691314,0.00064221886,0.0003797122,0.000006234264,0.000012054863,0.0008773404,0.000014474019,0.0008597715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965784,0.00016567626,0.00029465102,0.00010485296,0.000017796508,0.000012881566,0.0019187157,0.0000063038137,0.00090057985],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663395,0.0020776168,0.00012473781,0.00047370404,0.0003361782,0.0003537834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790202,0.012383457,0.004890385,0.0023332315,0.00083989074,0.0005329084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059310943,0.00048689172,0.0010536646,0.0017266269,0.00085159234,0.0025850357,0.0011723131,0.0016010321,0.0031907065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01541674,0.000361199,0.0010495735,0.0024084945,0.0008875085,0.0012366129,0.000998608,0.0011374728,0.00060153485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064371416,0.0005642557,0.9627316,0.000057340247,0.00085227046,0.00034964888,0.0012309946,0.013305684,0.000354021,0.0039899047,0.0024662064,0.013454338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024033136,0.00025005505,0.9547351,0.000049835373,0.00022603004,0.0002414389,0.0018321752,0.030818008,0.0005795036,0.0059146667,0.005023716,0.00008914754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16435933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.105672546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16435933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020848222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069281994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3268053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581394100","doi":"10.1086/339729","title":"Competing Premarital Investments","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Investment (military); Incentive; Economics; Public good; Marriage market; Quality (philosophy); Market competition; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.03956966720152694,"score_gpt":0.3028673719136666,"score_spread":0.26329770471213965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581394100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83639747,0.0016753091,0.02693978,0.0014671889,0.0000762592,0.0000703929,0.0005941713,0.000043493677,0.13273598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97964257,0.00037395532,0.0011674392,0.00007463736,0.000024259252,0.000019257583,0.0001214713,0.000007763792,0.01856857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993599,0.00017375022,0.000019532814,0.000092260976,0.000091240734,0.0002632465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790406,0.0009092342,0.00040225574,0.0001686564,0.00016250386,0.00045337618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011770424,0.00053184363,0.00061942084,0.0004986623,0.0009154297,0.0025637457,0.00130132,0.0012657546,0.025519175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050339014,0.00027316168,0.0005308737,0.0006279309,0.00086539943,0.0016834578,0.0013626894,0.0013651712,0.00094163086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031933427,0.00035412976,0.020776447,0.00011063253,0.00008668017,0.00066850556,0.00055909477,0.022572706,0.0017802707,0.9226786,0.0024618101,0.027631745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020161764,0.0008148059,0.03689291,0.00014096849,0.00019448604,0.0012433861,0.002278925,0.193694,0.0034754938,0.7352554,0.025702262,0.00010577372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002808143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004732163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025519175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017310459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079827296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08537012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581892736","doi":"","title":"Women, Tax and Social Programs: The Gendered Impact of Funding Social Programs Through the Tax System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tax credit; Indirect tax; Tax reform; Public economics; Value-added tax; Ad valorem tax; Subsidy; Direct tax; State income tax; Tax avoidance; Economics; Business; Labour economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.036472136413103255,"score_gpt":0.293967472139712,"score_spread":0.25749533572660877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581892736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58627915,0.012308166,0.0012490556,0.04717813,0.0003826751,0.000042554664,0.00037071737,0.000014186599,0.35217538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849113,0.0027264592,0.00014664794,0.0014127905,0.00010117226,0.00001671827,0.000027336591,0.000009714162,0.010647678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796593,0.0011228431,0.000019989639,0.00008576697,0.00032065302,0.00048483978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819416,0.0008779321,0.0003472855,0.000046311197,0.00015733296,0.00037695703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015686101,0.0002062999,0.00016700354,0.0011442662,0.0019661132,0.0024603794,0.00031681423,0.0007589984,0.01483254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037931115,0.00007830083,0.00026295587,0.0010488594,0.003574851,0.002241362,0.002106988,0.00089585246,0.00037649932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005431026,0.00032965053,0.14953135,0.00028697102,0.00016254187,0.0010349673,0.03059568,0.00094480964,0.0009403474,0.6332959,0.017268322,0.1650664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011110691,0.00075778994,0.4105836,0.0012666422,0.00020816519,0.0011350698,0.10390175,0.0008718578,0.0018126534,0.117900506,0.36137384,0.00007693604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010228867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02395643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01483254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029978314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020182196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049619734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584001513","doi":"","title":"Women, Social Policy and Poverty","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Political science; Development economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.0061116254935455324,"score_gpt":0.18667995166008358,"score_spread":0.18056832616653806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584001513","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13888717,0.18674023,0.00038702774,0.38386416,0.0016077447,0.000043555363,0.00090364215,0.0000566337,0.2875098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7648122,0.04956288,0.00024049233,0.008816959,0.00088182965,0.000057459038,0.00012227666,0.000041160773,0.1754648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993297,0.00024094098,0.000009989763,0.000039365485,0.00013331974,0.00024671777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989126,0.00042398184,0.000073056544,0.00002787659,0.00019225622,0.00037018725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012127466,0.0003952678,0.00036774186,0.0011530734,0.008208831,0.0057465453,0.0006626788,0.0021185996,0.027194412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002462281,0.00018123517,0.00013297598,0.0024550706,0.005417786,0.0020578876,0.001967091,0.0012838324,0.00070609397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014316257,0.0003366508,0.03811387,0.00042549951,0.00006296429,0.0005229618,0.03089302,0.0007576539,0.00045969925,0.5516621,0.27251256,0.10410984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040994502,0.000057815814,0.082061484,0.0009112239,0.000046730074,0.00013013,0.057126172,0.00025327312,0.00022909902,0.0625311,0.79657423,0.000037728678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58576226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7804578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58576226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0110710645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020168845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83335453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584408917","doi":"","title":"Fécondité et incitatifs fiscaux : quelles conclusions pouvons-nous en tirer?","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"CIRANO Project Reports","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.023288101353100558,"score_gpt":0.3170254510613007,"score_spread":0.29373734970820015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584408917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75455374,0.06677546,0.011859117,0.105822615,0.0006092764,0.00033756765,0.004916717,0.000109457585,0.05501597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9417207,0.02039371,0.0026267914,0.0077144606,0.00063288945,0.00013244973,0.0008005575,0.000047780042,0.025930539],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772114,0.00082150666,0.00006811163,0.00040791923,0.00046228353,0.000518952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97932625,0.0121135395,0.0030461017,0.00092410477,0.002767574,0.0018224777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006454291,0.0005633096,0.0012879027,0.00082079397,0.0007430015,0.0018709467,0.0016474483,0.0013100929,0.016225934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018436683,0.00021528004,0.001206615,0.0014288797,0.0028278397,0.0016979446,0.00094652723,0.0016085875,0.000797058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027646248,0.00049118797,0.72054005,0.0019910755,0.001665904,0.000805829,0.0052882545,0.0036537237,0.0025117279,0.04593097,0.007161169,0.2071955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006328842,0.0005306979,0.9542152,0.0006550426,0.000617744,0.00010047962,0.003482052,0.0011338736,0.0011271191,0.009999954,0.028013501,0.00006100735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40177307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45869395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40177307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036908712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006301849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79886895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585529017","doi":"","title":"Welfare Hot Buttons: Women, Work and Social Policy Reform","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare reform; Work (physics); Social work; Social Welfare; Social policy; Welfare; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Law; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.02088054833785339,"score_gpt":0.2741586950061899,"score_spread":0.2532781466683365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585529017","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13396393,0.03278975,0.0007052808,0.57318544,0.0015324826,0.00007215635,0.0007772508,0.000066747525,0.25690702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86849356,0.014436565,0.00059012085,0.042110957,0.0005668862,0.00008784451,0.00016958687,0.00005993939,0.07348461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948836,0.0010991753,0.000059916205,0.00018926115,0.00093593413,0.0028320488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654824,0.001286291,0.00016988203,0.00010802499,0.0006489763,0.0012386254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005251376,0.00044826814,0.0007390125,0.0033112187,0.030924607,0.012471633,0.001901614,0.005658237,0.018631063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009545544,0.00036145307,0.000435335,0.0069143837,0.019659111,0.0049554505,0.0043272944,0.005157614,0.00042210834],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015563544,0.00009934086,0.006542512,0.00026096267,0.000026572357,0.00019769825,0.0531491,0.000373744,0.00031391706,0.7744102,0.113457166,0.05101309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080464415,0.000047331192,0.045645207,0.0009774198,0.00006859172,0.00004314884,0.22197866,0.00030554493,0.0003611606,0.057959855,0.6724324,0.00010022269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99626225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14976564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14976564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26856783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98615134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586036008","doi":"","title":"Those Who Work, Those Who Don't: Poverty, Morality and Family in Rural America (review)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Poverty; Work (physics); Sociology; Rural poverty; Development economics; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.03334437934923673,"score_gpt":0.27792980292355307,"score_spread":0.24458542357431634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586036008","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027811405,0.9987056,0.00001124207,0.00072100846,0.00013864922,0.0000020007349,0.0000053500985,7.1257676e-7,0.00013723651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019970618,0.99744946,0.00003707941,0.00026158916,0.00011094714,0.0000054751777,0.000008198392,3.852972e-7,0.00012984673],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963236,0.00016075796,0.000048161433,0.00003795645,0.00008015298,0.000040592713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861455,0.00086843775,0.00021818712,0.000016529177,0.00016472564,0.00011751671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015142976,0.0006782257,0.0017206176,0.0018469627,0.0006586626,0.0015576918,0.00077194953,0.0016421488,0.0024283933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024517064,0.00030563874,0.00047741522,0.0035899216,0.0012140129,0.0020392956,0.001075235,0.001422993,0.00026684778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013161465,0.0001229856,0.0028281428,0.05360546,0.0004932307,0.00020529359,0.0015723798,0.00015318977,0.00021653838,0.0032169784,0.07126046,0.8661937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014974696,0.00037232705,0.03819406,0.1103617,0.0014509233,0.0021430876,0.010530615,0.00014333583,0.00016942616,0.0046616043,0.8317413,0.00008188321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013307831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052297626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013307831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001016293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004090256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026460767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586492695","doi":"","title":"Reforming the Financial Incentives of the Welfare System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"Incentive; Welfare; Work (physics); Poverty; Government (linguistics); Business; Welfare reform; Public economics; Economics; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.009757572443266043,"score_gpt":0.22851748101737507,"score_spread":0.218759908574109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586492695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67585,0.0030570051,0.02040667,0.07066986,0.00054972543,0.00029572909,0.00038405065,0.00018273196,0.22860423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879358,0.0006407338,0.0023840729,0.0017010819,0.000109410204,0.00009047996,0.000028050456,0.000009476103,0.007100977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954426,0.0024804696,0.00008025416,0.0002001497,0.0005187462,0.0012778303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543035,0.0019452178,0.0008465474,0.00036366016,0.0007087875,0.00070548645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005904418,0.00027286753,0.00022908651,0.00086394115,0.0022052745,0.0030188963,0.00071847264,0.0014415446,0.0064567076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0120419115,0.00017101606,0.00021918966,0.00066471176,0.003523057,0.0031567137,0.0027798105,0.0012945093,0.0003605486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002147845,0.00030379134,0.011267311,0.0001497351,0.000022848726,0.00010739312,0.0027708597,0.0054879766,0.00090132677,0.8967618,0.0076247053,0.07438749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047781988,0.0008186042,0.05020584,0.00088213227,0.00008406547,0.00016552738,0.009235119,0.011619053,0.0030222211,0.51205873,0.41127986,0.00015097407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024919117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032353356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024919117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070832265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01677148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051392615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587322992","doi":"","title":"The Academy, the Prison and the Psychiatric Hospital: How Each Affects Mothering Occupations (Panel)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CommonKnowledge Research Repository (Pacific University Oregon)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Psychiatry; Psychology; Psychiatric hospital; Criminology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04366686001559526,"score_gpt":0.30441637709976027,"score_spread":0.260749517084165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587322992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90227157,0.011762469,0.00048083588,0.024844585,0.0014339763,0.000046339384,0.00017631515,0.00003089643,0.0589529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693559,0.010545911,0.0003637376,0.0033917576,0.00021280287,0.000074145944,0.000071955925,0.000027369062,0.015956465],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987562,0.00071847875,0.000027999571,0.00006160079,0.00014321876,0.00029257778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907887,0.00034653713,0.00013501223,0.000029289697,0.00009907744,0.0003111389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012890527,0.0002552835,0.0003614434,0.00047873173,0.0065408386,0.0037215687,0.0005260334,0.0008784592,0.009058602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024611999,0.00024825943,0.00031829134,0.00048615923,0.0018639144,0.0015741833,0.0045481515,0.0015992229,0.00057649805],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012331238,0.00018120857,0.065902054,0.0005246059,0.0000492978,0.002163364,0.7828965,0.000054180742,0.0017520242,0.0061634267,0.05377993,0.08641008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005320114,0.00010484652,0.05838172,0.0004014386,0.000020956988,0.0010089311,0.87646186,0.000021883621,0.00023600819,0.00033462755,0.06300565,0.00001674177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009903729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040612143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009903729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001815033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017050861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030304015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587733437","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.569184","title":"Poverty Persistence in Sweden","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"Poverty; Immigration; Welfare; Demographic economics; Panel data; Economics; Refugee; Percentage point; Hazard ratio; Educational attainment; Demography; Geography; Econometrics; Economic growth; Sociology; Statistics; Confidence interval","score_opus":0.018404391414076297,"score_gpt":0.2698144340005123,"score_spread":0.251410042586436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587733437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954522,0.0005665014,0.000020636386,0.0009183609,0.000023445564,0.0000029561147,0.00032245356,0.0000048360557,0.0026886961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99748045,0.0003499804,0.000013953603,0.00004492734,0.000013291114,0.000008445873,0.0003469318,0.000006017371,0.0017359159],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986615,0.00020713394,0.0000838521,0.00014883814,0.00012604005,0.0007725742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998147,0.0002513525,0.0004646209,0.00009079792,0.00040813288,0.000638061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000999898,0.00028324127,0.00072715554,0.002704612,0.0029382354,0.0040861755,0.000549146,0.00096785004,0.0047844793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003362305,0.00020716642,0.0005056862,0.0033649907,0.0010307555,0.0013701159,0.0052927616,0.0011720998,0.0009059246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008796004,0.00046834795,0.9099452,0.0002126396,0.00022327476,0.0017584444,0.0266578,0.00081554963,0.00035103408,0.0049010464,0.008806745,0.044980366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022158812,0.00025122173,0.9042621,0.00030826317,0.00009603958,0.0006350202,0.074616306,0.00043125774,0.00022494704,0.0024907184,0.016623162,0.000038903134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07067407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07875068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07067407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031277135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050226036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1405254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588397033","doi":"10.1007/s10834-009-9161-z","title":"N. Gilbert: A Mother’s Work: How Feminism, the Market, and Policy Shape Family Life","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Work (physics); Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03003471867970039,"score_gpt":0.29035107004707683,"score_spread":0.26031635136737646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588397033","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01676818,0.03739553,0.00095838326,0.8985505,0.003511332,0.000028335795,0.00014322031,0.00003358492,0.04261095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45290482,0.10241414,0.0037666766,0.30097443,0.0033846935,0.00017587184,0.00010302958,0.000227612,0.13604875],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923503,0.0004812159,0.000025107527,0.00006920402,0.00008229584,0.000107136024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717855,0.0018354066,0.00015726374,0.00004067975,0.0003274309,0.00046077278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022082576,0.00043427953,0.00036410743,0.00087806967,0.0069975466,0.0035081164,0.0008909552,0.006529734,0.014109387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056377365,0.0002833623,0.00026356327,0.00075539696,0.0035827395,0.006645439,0.002809978,0.004846633,0.0012090546],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001447632,0.000048881462,0.00488748,0.00043375025,0.000018241244,0.0015066118,0.06866127,0.00015814728,0.00039907702,0.120680645,0.74576515,0.057296075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005675486,0.000058437356,0.010277459,0.0023326764,0.000040948646,0.0020938069,0.21847431,0.0003957625,0.00082007097,0.057415046,0.70792747,0.0001072636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041729458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1107276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041729458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020047906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045717093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08297312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588951482","doi":"","title":"Working Hours in Canada and the United States","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Working hours; Economics; Unemployment; Supply side; Incentive; Labour economics; Demand side; Demographic economics; Wage; Wage inequality; Divergence (linguistics); Economic growth; Market economy; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.036313119231036084,"score_gpt":0.30297708477425567,"score_spread":0.2666639655432196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588951482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93957835,0.0046155704,0.00013794962,0.0013498125,0.00007400874,0.000027190667,0.020474587,0.00002597676,0.03371657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98230034,0.0025452445,0.00015400814,0.00018777417,0.00002235775,0.000014455113,0.006025952,0.000009716225,0.00874021],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934345,0.000026783564,0.000023529696,0.000062687664,0.00023692507,0.00030649448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976936,0.00011428634,0.0002815808,0.000035127494,0.0012021363,0.00067312754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000429847,0.00016002648,0.00024452686,0.0030856172,0.002099625,0.0017315132,0.0005131581,0.0002960302,0.0026875904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019476921,0.000105979925,0.00026618637,0.00642651,0.00047780783,0.00031891462,0.0006166732,0.00035765636,0.000290061],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011475973,0.000049543356,0.9271557,0.00007925799,0.000074734286,0.00021130104,0.0056459014,0.0009474155,0.00014056903,0.0023979866,0.01869142,0.04449153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019469037,0.000006300561,0.9806029,0.000041535193,0.000008885359,0.000026388336,0.0032801596,0.00015566811,0.000035667475,0.00005303133,0.015778031,0.000009467991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99553216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99706703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020468717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020468717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019986002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14851165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589162855","doi":"","title":"A 'Natural Experiment' on the Economics of Storks: Evidence on the Impact of Differential Family Policy on Fertility Rates in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; Total fertility rate; Subsidy; Population; Birth rate; Demographic economics; Earned income tax credit; Government (linguistics); Public economics; Demography; Tax credit; Family planning; Sociology","score_opus":0.06960414284664632,"score_gpt":0.3748091740311469,"score_spread":0.3052050311845006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589162855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9830707,0.0018143643,0.0005895071,0.0015597304,0.00003758923,0.0003655693,0.0017316567,0.000026423277,0.010804447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945246,0.00084460515,0.00041002582,0.0004003,0.000020412299,0.000076164746,0.0006107858,0.000008789173,0.003104367],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927804,0.00405585,0.00017552185,0.00076077617,0.0013896435,0.00083779613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9602574,0.025996484,0.0061356733,0.0026822926,0.0036929655,0.0012351903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00883725,0.00037195606,0.00071595766,0.0008481854,0.0035912232,0.0014835655,0.0020061191,0.0008546428,0.0038412372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020848906,0.00025611336,0.0006396936,0.0015079036,0.0053064683,0.00066549325,0.0010045345,0.001047387,0.00020569004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02438078,0.009621543,0.72237974,0.0013830228,0.0028813167,0.0009897248,0.013630659,0.016382458,0.0054945,0.045637876,0.023178,0.1340403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023145583,0.0038910743,0.95475596,0.00015381543,0.0008348731,0.00007336454,0.007240214,0.005873689,0.002939677,0.0044211037,0.017358748,0.00014292821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.972073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9744737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03906372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03906372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024799086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2834285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589684068","doi":"","title":"Amour et argent : mobilite intergenerationnelle et appariement conjugal d'apres le revenu des parents","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.24526582516490542,"score_gpt":0.4297532602663694,"score_spread":0.18448743510146398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589684068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9331913,0.015593219,0.0014052901,0.0038223015,0.00013788619,0.00008328503,0.0015499038,0.000023143655,0.04419368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584668,0.010047965,0.001700337,0.0006225627,0.000050095092,0.000120514116,0.00063205673,0.00002624128,0.028333459],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988017,0.00038313816,0.00006310672,0.0001542125,0.00042315136,0.00017466367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969399,0.0012375521,0.00059108424,0.00016936535,0.0008151787,0.00024688523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023566643,0.00026157757,0.00037390343,0.001777855,0.0032443318,0.003995979,0.00065222353,0.0006125692,0.008212287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008683658,0.00024164969,0.0004013391,0.0037208511,0.0015290778,0.0014302622,0.0016627081,0.00069811125,0.0004319439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042662685,0.000070757684,0.71570677,0.000695559,0.00024234057,0.0019775017,0.11323422,0.00029089887,0.0010753177,0.014487404,0.0053186473,0.14647403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015125212,0.00006263769,0.8666488,0.000588709,0.00012997523,0.0006300999,0.061460897,0.00013506446,0.00048654634,0.0014928468,0.06831066,0.000038684917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59879667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71422744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59879667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057739555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8071322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590730874","doi":"10.1111/ecoj.12385","title":"Changing the Rules Midway: The Impact of Granting Alimony Rights on Existing and Newly Formed Partnerships","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Alimony; Beneficiary; Affect (linguistics); Economics; Matching (statistics); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06667810089108864,"score_gpt":0.3117957988122618,"score_spread":0.2451176979211732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590730874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687164,0.00042910318,0.0005085332,0.0015980374,0.0000287388,0.00007018431,0.00008579453,0.000008959616,0.028554274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739254,0.00011858692,0.000117783195,0.00016247509,0.0000057518864,0.000008437964,0.000021465958,0.0000019081776,0.0021710657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99617445,0.00082800764,0.000061976265,0.0002553635,0.0005943129,0.0020858399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932407,0.0021761102,0.0013729582,0.00053924765,0.0010312835,0.0016396403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002664068,0.00017394173,0.0005181548,0.0005146344,0.0040431935,0.0030677216,0.0013638461,0.0012583876,0.007111789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014617675,0.00020516157,0.00040873006,0.00064332166,0.0038863905,0.0016445834,0.0022811801,0.0015707532,0.00029341143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023226915,0.0037066047,0.50932735,0.0003109113,0.00039114448,0.0016535325,0.017677063,0.033150256,0.0062860902,0.19278285,0.006971169,0.22542033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055878336,0.0019601958,0.8226316,0.00028296208,0.0006288127,0.00023140437,0.055198643,0.020740245,0.004969617,0.035107702,0.0575402,0.00014979938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7204382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8394302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7204382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01934894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019682908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56241643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591719308","doi":"10.7202/1121111ar","title":"Breaking the Bowls: Degendering and Feminist Change. Judith Lorber","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.11510274682485165,"score_gpt":0.40420551885675754,"score_spread":0.2891027720319059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591719308","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048318803,0.10510236,0.0012067928,0.77460647,0.0068409154,0.000022036313,0.00004360719,0.00005203333,0.10729388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36962238,0.07412209,0.0024926723,0.2111894,0.0055120564,0.00013955095,0.000041770687,0.00024258379,0.33663753],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976578,0.0016173393,0.000038783874,0.0002196037,0.0002883648,0.00017807029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975204,0.0016913702,0.00010853889,0.00012440994,0.00031620415,0.00023910741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037213604,0.0005771941,0.00039383007,0.00080729707,0.011376555,0.0051449193,0.0011922409,0.0049320585,0.011081102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006886533,0.00032603703,0.00019593663,0.0008179714,0.018322073,0.010449256,0.0029006521,0.0066474197,0.0012677804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046236655,0.000040733532,0.0002719548,0.00012078272,0.0000060673187,0.00019492292,0.025308685,0.00009929972,0.0001654889,0.28438568,0.650966,0.038394053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012165589,0.000020636482,0.00034027974,0.0003853989,0.0000044811245,0.000114961615,0.031723283,0.00008725241,0.00036561355,0.0798703,0.88705945,0.000016128133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014958576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034975704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014958576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003189718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026775443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037069976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592452761","doi":"10.3386/w8444","title":"The Limits to Wage Growth: Measuring the Growth Rate of Wages For Recent Welfare Leavers","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Wage growth; Earnings; Economics; Wage; Labour economics; Subsidy; Incentive; Hourly wage; Welfare reform; Work (physics); Demographic economics","score_opus":0.2729835551393966,"score_gpt":0.4513284788379801,"score_spread":0.1783449236985835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592452761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9573394,0.009986688,0.0064616,0.0007229164,0.00011010555,0.00014362307,0.0045769266,0.00004622261,0.020612491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98433626,0.003746001,0.0034190582,0.00020366393,0.000104597624,0.00027583097,0.0037420217,0.000026779173,0.0041459096],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663144,0.0008823548,0.00033048383,0.00040486644,0.0015088872,0.00024200488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98717123,0.0033915436,0.005830362,0.0008754584,0.0022405987,0.000490748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007731813,0.0003057722,0.00041719188,0.0027308655,0.0006379903,0.0014122477,0.0010885389,0.00089025265,0.001259417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023352675,0.00026457338,0.00034014843,0.0030852612,0.00079961825,0.0013120951,0.0010598928,0.00092005887,0.00088320905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047068638,0.00015447519,0.8793921,0.0003961151,0.00015526018,0.00007769545,0.004088348,0.0009296383,0.0015228709,0.0025015124,0.0028585366,0.10745273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075614557,0.0001060016,0.99057794,0.00008481041,0.000024874624,0.00013712356,0.001071802,0.00062846736,0.0008602863,0.0006842793,0.005797863,0.000019054729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01966453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02567978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01966453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014145822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007303067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040890217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592653239","doi":"10.7202/013468ar","title":"Quand un et un ne font plus deux","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Welfare economics; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04743317717325571,"score_gpt":0.26807325486161143,"score_spread":0.22064007768835572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592653239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14870155,0.010993017,0.33844712,0.072377674,0.0037415463,0.00041741377,0.0042694225,0.0006062459,0.42044604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77302355,0.0048634163,0.046387743,0.004187724,0.0009069198,0.000614578,0.0011721873,0.00030352324,0.16854037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970688,0.0010407614,0.00012865146,0.0006558074,0.00062414777,0.00048192404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959239,0.0017147054,0.0006762364,0.00065435754,0.00056543795,0.00046532595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035721005,0.00074188155,0.0012609601,0.0010654128,0.0020530713,0.0066021415,0.0014446093,0.0033769961,0.038385313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012007893,0.00045914392,0.0020007666,0.0017190138,0.0035552091,0.010179176,0.0030942643,0.0033525673,0.0034778141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001316122,0.00008088513,0.0046580243,0.00014426486,0.00008373293,0.00017227033,0.001331531,0.0035569444,0.00026503566,0.9623541,0.006317929,0.020903554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012822537,0.0002539957,0.007273862,0.00040155507,0.00016592487,0.0005662691,0.0033706634,0.016615933,0.0008138193,0.63862836,0.33164373,0.00013778133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019005679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015789993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038385313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030495885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032518993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12841165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593576974","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2370441","title":"Female Labour Force Participation in MENA's Manufacturing Sector: The Implications of Firm-Related and National Factors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Manufacturing sector; Labour economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.017287226753030224,"score_gpt":0.2854895161838115,"score_spread":0.2682022894307813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593576974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978703,0.00015123663,0.000015281277,0.00040251922,0.0000048506477,0.0000024106591,0.00006423727,5.212272e-7,0.0014885609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990355,0.000080360835,0.000008043425,0.00003535346,0.0000061970813,0.0000036957274,0.00003358408,6.298319e-7,0.0007965832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945,0.00014209219,0.000017499311,0.000046258956,0.000048844988,0.00029528936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990637,0.00031839317,0.0001659762,0.000021779088,0.000052336076,0.00037783955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006809787,0.00012323372,0.00020273685,0.00065046834,0.001294852,0.0010613479,0.0003862749,0.00050752965,0.007944046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017260589,0.00012359241,0.00023637887,0.0008273886,0.0005681669,0.00067092635,0.0010300679,0.0005513224,0.00043817336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013647642,0.00013054564,0.9862416,0.000015958487,0.000012568294,0.00019967095,0.006133002,0.00004877353,0.00035034688,0.001124594,0.00032898138,0.005277495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032749938,0.00004753086,0.97924405,0.000020674766,0.00000431932,0.00008623586,0.019365117,0.00010432748,0.000057645775,0.00015056647,0.0009129942,0.000003253058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028978515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06446163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028978515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077853544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010454477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05761969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594779506","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.805326","title":"No-Fault Divorce and the Division of Marital Assets","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Psychology; Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Mathematics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.006406284685509363,"score_gpt":0.25648011938623,"score_spread":0.25007383470072064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594779506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994538,0.00030137534,0.000056731995,0.00055023545,0.000009090521,0.000002553014,0.000031717933,4.986872e-7,0.004509717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936455,0.000054633783,0.00001223783,0.000015043604,0.0000048008296,8.6530923e-7,0.000010519409,3.4560992e-7,0.0005370993],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995958,0.00015038972,0.000019793248,0.000032488468,0.000055878452,0.00014560031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947379,0.0018400598,0.0015981296,0.00022421806,0.00026238558,0.0013372384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009913108,0.000087343105,0.00023231175,0.00063169183,0.0015168064,0.0016354377,0.00046177572,0.0004919997,0.008153224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009346176,0.00011355748,0.00012056155,0.00066551747,0.0015324989,0.0012824171,0.0011593186,0.0008704305,0.00034046423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008336207,0.00038365333,0.9402513,0.000018609897,0.000040165305,0.00038261327,0.0095498,0.0002633461,0.00026191695,0.02506784,0.00058341195,0.022363758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044295473,0.00018776777,0.94940907,0.000039507715,0.000025356556,0.00034255226,0.030092811,0.0005998612,0.00018664087,0.016436055,0.0026213732,0.000014742383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005642786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011964913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008153224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008334979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079052034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027275264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595191535","doi":"","title":"Contesting Conservatisms, Family Feuds and the Privatization of Dependency","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Vision; Politics; Power (physics); Political science; Libertarianism; Political economy; Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.021096696250227004,"score_gpt":0.2491846497538522,"score_spread":0.2280879535036252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595191535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65713835,0.0022165824,0.016513893,0.06092885,0.00011462311,0.000031076645,0.00006256718,0.00004073833,0.2629534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976859,0.00011654387,0.00017210422,0.0002983014,0.000012584674,0.000008298264,0.0000024079366,0.0000036862957,0.0017001887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942583,0.0032599878,0.00014775446,0.0005437024,0.000625592,0.0011646708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963863,0.0017952019,0.0006581014,0.00054233207,0.00021588316,0.0004021464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006791833,0.000185021,0.00033963693,0.0008145137,0.011939922,0.004657541,0.00074432825,0.0017826216,0.002574517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072810496,0.00019540417,0.00025105654,0.0009332204,0.051939912,0.004849067,0.0066201673,0.0026569888,0.00009620667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000780149,0.000004960707,0.00084594695,0.0000045350243,0.0000015743647,0.00005348074,0.017502146,0.00012833645,0.000049360944,0.97859955,0.00043684605,0.0023654965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002440879,0.000025401612,0.0055188388,0.0000887402,0.00000769498,0.00022274714,0.03974019,0.0007769177,0.0003011459,0.90028733,0.052983306,0.000023302186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03281223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036911022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03281223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017544849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008716071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1272974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595545280","doi":"10.1080/03906701.1987.9971334","title":"The household division of labour in young dual‐earner couples the case of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Dual (grammatical number); Division (mathematics); Sociology; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Market economy; Mathematics; Art","score_opus":0.01923676428177433,"score_gpt":0.3132988920302331,"score_spread":0.29406212774845875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595545280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9294982,0.013745458,0.00029170638,0.012879764,0.00016126466,0.000066905384,0.00025674593,0.0000068246345,0.04309314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864036,0.005355186,0.00015039621,0.00066937396,0.000019915133,0.000021073243,0.000049285165,0.0000054412967,0.007325719],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746823,0.00041628248,0.000034677916,0.00013808355,0.0003032181,0.0016394692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977381,0.00039924742,0.00016074021,0.000060153594,0.00061437057,0.0010274661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001676952,0.0003212717,0.0006616492,0.0023183245,0.029269075,0.0060676825,0.0022202781,0.0020506321,0.0049596652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033778804,0.0003453671,0.0003696106,0.0056723147,0.010019741,0.0017061001,0.0044485573,0.0021991534,0.00019322164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021407465,0.00020011896,0.12899736,0.0002773774,0.0000697036,0.008601741,0.55423266,0.0011565468,0.0007031434,0.19340348,0.022981461,0.0891623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018744247,0.00003127578,0.11210572,0.00053240394,0.000042183565,0.0008929767,0.80702674,0.00055167667,0.00013522101,0.0057103955,0.07287481,0.00007782244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99784625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0969512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0969512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14153568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7034335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596978337","doi":"10.1080/00220388.2014.989992","title":"Gender Parity and Schooling Choices","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Development Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Growth Centre","keywords":"Educational attainment; Parity (physics); Demographic economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demography; Psychology; Economics; Geography; Sociology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.11218210440751156,"score_gpt":0.34717960788575725,"score_spread":0.2349975034782457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596978337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971732,0.0002870017,0.00013049482,0.00023846136,0.000009483731,0.0000059317745,0.00070059724,0.0000019479785,0.0014528505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936527,0.0000690153,0.000037935348,0.00001569592,0.000004287647,0.000003305211,0.00020312736,0.0000011116013,0.00030035997],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947196,0.00020816858,0.00002904792,0.00007374901,0.00007944778,0.000137585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948808,0.0018333179,0.0022117791,0.0001530481,0.00017449445,0.00074666797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008554763,0.00013629538,0.00023472747,0.00089425256,0.0004280852,0.0005418169,0.00023328685,0.00024931142,0.0076346844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062258225,0.00014858777,0.00026988977,0.0012701071,0.00051966164,0.00046346182,0.0006052168,0.0004864144,0.00064382126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040945644,0.000016240025,0.9968148,0.000006548729,0.000014693469,0.00007899452,0.00032574416,0.000041694453,0.00005477309,0.000238604,0.00018592425,0.0021810662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003398723,0.000027483948,0.9979526,0.000017895116,0.0000059187055,0.0001167419,0.0007741813,0.00016247736,0.00003663546,0.00026455175,0.00063503865,0.0000030032868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013763936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020356793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013763936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035501766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002728025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027367651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598142118","doi":"","title":"Age, Retirement and Expenditure Patterns: An Econometric Study of Older Canadian Households","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Almost ideal demand system; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Demographic economics; Goods and services; Population; Retirement age; Population ageing; Labour economics; Demography; Production (economics); Pension; Microeconomics; Finance; Economy","score_opus":0.07141793077154013,"score_gpt":0.3386177953951827,"score_spread":0.2671998646236426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598142118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99491185,0.0005045582,0.0004646829,0.0003756758,0.000007635484,0.000037776776,0.0027292105,0.000015197517,0.0009536048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904783,0.0009609698,0.000684978,0.00010262301,0.000016687305,0.00003044927,0.004350183,0.000010369311,0.0033654247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991968,0.00013861693,0.00003729483,0.00007767308,0.0001441307,0.0004054252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735767,0.0010457577,0.00048375197,0.00015190577,0.0005613176,0.00039952475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017222654,0.0005853926,0.0008162343,0.002135212,0.0026877413,0.0015033873,0.0013560647,0.00087541476,0.0036017047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055326745,0.0005192811,0.0013449755,0.007700911,0.00093583507,0.00067550415,0.0009810695,0.0010871378,0.00045807948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031310593,0.0002970322,0.96478444,0.00007055712,0.00026679045,0.00040376757,0.002653134,0.010614095,0.00026538692,0.0022790167,0.0029247836,0.015127955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025693676,0.000073447874,0.96686405,0.000033049688,0.000109066816,0.000098505385,0.006325187,0.023056123,0.00010413821,0.00040435727,0.0028542283,0.000052046096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9916328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9889985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021029904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021029904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012565286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15258336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598196439","doi":"","title":"Life After Welfare: The Economic Well-being of Welfare Leavers in Canada During the 1990s","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Earnings; Economics; Demographic economics; Longitudinal data; Labour economics; Welfare system; Term (time); Demography; Market economy; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.012585686307180504,"score_gpt":0.26313539759148596,"score_spread":0.2505497112843055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598196439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906557,0.0015625658,0.000038067752,0.0017186912,0.00003396919,0.00003311253,0.0038959915,0.0000042851957,0.0020575789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99401516,0.0011403776,0.00006168778,0.0002948114,0.000013627054,0.000014407003,0.0018160059,0.0000037838072,0.0026402604],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988361,0.00008003042,0.000030824798,0.000103826445,0.0002879234,0.00066130585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976956,0.000079594356,0.00035899828,0.000049200327,0.00093356834,0.0008831045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001306857,0.0003159895,0.0005827731,0.0016741665,0.0056748167,0.0025206783,0.0014740068,0.00091136934,0.0020610883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027713215,0.00027549232,0.00047759863,0.00507461,0.0016322186,0.0010209866,0.0016363498,0.0018062021,0.0003234069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019391094,0.00015190893,0.960887,0.000057791018,0.00006279524,0.00014973577,0.018887535,0.00017470976,0.00022527574,0.00050398154,0.0039427737,0.014762529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052387168,0.00002931797,0.98657113,0.0000549255,0.000013312193,0.000020039333,0.010354351,0.0000970309,0.000036534788,0.00005098469,0.002751046,0.000016032445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038473457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038473457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038074996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27914578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598984332","doi":"","title":"Tax Incentives and Fertility in Canada: Permanent vs. Transitory Effects","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Humanities; Political science; Fertility; Geography; Demographic economics; Demography; Welfare economics; Economics; Sociology; Population; Art","score_opus":0.012255295238351201,"score_gpt":0.21976284387024433,"score_spread":0.20750754863189314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598984332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9738081,0.0059410655,0.00068529503,0.0053332495,0.00008717054,0.000131208,0.0047399183,0.000038301943,0.009235704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856269,0.0026218249,0.00044549754,0.0003606614,0.000028172424,0.000030408395,0.00091954344,0.0000127469,0.0099542495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825424,0.0003040399,0.0000505389,0.00020267449,0.00041640157,0.00077206397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99126875,0.002342487,0.0013127599,0.00040467773,0.0025634926,0.002107787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021240613,0.00030287867,0.00072604703,0.0014293555,0.0032826148,0.0017327212,0.0012225221,0.00095110096,0.008326969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109147625,0.00024832762,0.0010249517,0.002900382,0.0014751696,0.0005644667,0.0010758865,0.0011822134,0.00025807283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009023465,0.00020827042,0.94245416,0.00014426745,0.0002795791,0.00020089909,0.0012240511,0.0038704283,0.00043063777,0.0065328684,0.0044967327,0.039255794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000917307,0.00013619341,0.98771685,0.00010783921,0.00021885551,0.000045797406,0.0014681938,0.0022761754,0.00025480898,0.0006749342,0.0069787707,0.000029857809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99607855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99814737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052917764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052917764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09722696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38394707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600741519","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720070305.007","title":"An Investigation of Rural Women Human Capital Investment in China","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; China; Investment (military); Capital (architecture); Ideology; Capital accumulation; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.011240816236471052,"score_gpt":0.2618664993031387,"score_spread":0.25062568306666766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600741519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988035,0.000045591336,0.000017778131,0.000073644886,7.49874e-7,0.0000041147996,0.000019182198,3.3338156e-7,0.0010351232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992168,0.0000553108,0.000028516995,0.000013601447,0.0000011568243,0.000005172428,0.0000137621455,2.2398535e-7,0.0006654278],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968934,0.00007113542,0.000010649731,0.000032671982,0.000054803997,0.00014145902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958545,0.00008960736,0.00012418276,0.000020647602,0.00006484228,0.00011529627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067087554,0.00016969237,0.00014088229,0.0015581597,0.0016709834,0.0006200345,0.0002538469,0.00021686431,0.0022182728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000876572,0.00012904168,0.000096652635,0.0022776946,0.00072239665,0.0004988905,0.0006878082,0.00018895826,0.00006496619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005995727,0.00006678461,0.9165248,0.00005010234,0.00001634143,0.00041041718,0.0584714,0.000155493,0.0014172848,0.0026293253,0.00034679452,0.019851295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003205091,0.00006851213,0.9677741,0.000015775486,0.000006832293,0.00006208111,0.029149352,0.00022137696,0.00022462758,0.00019701885,0.0022707796,0.000006296208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.100059174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19201365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100059174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002685033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030765703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19895357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601214651","doi":"","title":"The Household Revolution: Childcare, Housework,and Female Labor Force Participation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Labour economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.010632802790265265,"score_gpt":0.19276857828232138,"score_spread":0.18213577549205612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601214651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794271,0.0028128035,0.00008460275,0.0036711718,0.000021823644,0.000004717615,0.00017819372,0.000002558439,0.013797001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981244,0.00070640515,0.000021982492,0.00014378021,0.000026487742,0.0000038140147,0.00003402118,0.0000016186282,0.00093737064],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946684,0.00017454693,0.000013659701,0.00005080139,0.00005953944,0.00023450259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888474,0.0003731518,0.00039869014,0.000049107894,0.00004990331,0.00024440544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086187787,0.00015058149,0.00019707375,0.00068053976,0.0011369446,0.0011248565,0.00039438024,0.00051619014,0.006111214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019040965,0.0000938689,0.00012335046,0.0011577902,0.0020096323,0.0010256486,0.0010100746,0.0005544149,0.00025273408],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022847227,0.00024936398,0.8903627,0.00006126776,0.00004089955,0.0004789037,0.036441978,0.00017240913,0.0003415479,0.025752306,0.0045735417,0.041296683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008627995,0.000039163297,0.96725476,0.00006858273,0.000007668118,0.0001861955,0.020988068,0.00009735717,0.00009707282,0.001591472,0.009652559,0.00000839945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03405173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048655283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03405173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009911876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050897914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601795952","doi":"","title":"Estimating a third-order translog demand system using Canadian micro-data","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Third order; Econometrics; Estimator; Homogeneity (statistics); Covariance; Order (exchange); Statistical hypothesis testing; Covariance matrix; Mathematics; Maximization; Economics; Mathematical optimization; Statistics","score_opus":0.0713254038682457,"score_gpt":0.354059063576109,"score_spread":0.2827336597078633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601795952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7879759,0.00060679246,0.19176471,0.0016553677,0.00007522518,0.00034752302,0.01108406,0.0008690193,0.0056213993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91465986,0.00035700778,0.07223799,0.00024894488,0.000022217922,0.00015093008,0.007967977,0.000102878956,0.0042522103],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787545,0.0007714877,0.000099363046,0.00041584004,0.00043005942,0.00040791443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950748,0.0021881415,0.00090896874,0.0005630008,0.0010733674,0.00019168056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047424734,0.0008648266,0.0010293945,0.0027749268,0.0018253581,0.001641111,0.0013944827,0.00080003706,0.003898487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012247919,0.00076339307,0.0015989495,0.0034336317,0.00102752,0.000795631,0.0014698136,0.0012990921,0.00045379414],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036407402,0.00021487822,0.4377975,0.00037531726,0.0009892462,0.00052099745,0.0017912543,0.3627457,0.001831843,0.08326467,0.011186945,0.09891755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010632531,0.000116615585,0.16088456,0.000095261596,0.00019682212,0.00014612301,0.0014855695,0.7975454,0.0017638033,0.022082755,0.015373912,0.00020282975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93331134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9239146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06668866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012874166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015075133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13416272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602367872","doi":"","title":"Impact de la Prime au travail sur l'effort au travail : une approche expérimentale","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02909443343513594,"score_gpt":0.32838086942221606,"score_spread":0.2992864359870801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602367872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9600228,0.00041192496,0.010127113,0.0004508373,0.00026049546,0.012598625,0.00073511206,0.00015804566,0.015235102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85520446,0.0007423376,0.03845336,0.00066335715,0.00012086981,0.07641182,0.0006180412,0.000102573824,0.027683113],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99353313,0.0036954398,0.0003357665,0.0010481232,0.00086582924,0.00052172656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779714,0.014780359,0.0017033444,0.0022325797,0.0023816568,0.0009306205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008719554,0.0016551876,0.0014860526,0.00044217947,0.0024789728,0.0021991346,0.0025388447,0.001810118,0.022621894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017495537,0.0012074858,0.0012775632,0.0005767599,0.0024110863,0.0014667204,0.001931757,0.0026443666,0.001953559],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10913718,0.2775973,0.05690667,0.017343821,0.0027550466,0.0011706027,0.07514641,0.019613069,0.07577021,0.022607083,0.01008202,0.33187062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05896904,0.44379047,0.2952419,0.002621144,0.006147424,0.00022913353,0.021157827,0.017453672,0.03869649,0.021224175,0.09350963,0.00095913233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024221282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03192181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024221282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047459383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058389585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07567781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602957194","doi":"","title":"Low-fee ($5/day/child) Regulated Childcare Policy and the Labor Supply of Mothers with Young Children: A Natural Experiment from Canada / La politique des services de garde à 5 $/jour et l'offre de travail des mères québécoises: résultats d'une expérience naturelle canadienne","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural experiment; Subsidy; Demographic economics; Christian ministry; Government (linguistics); Political science; Demography; Business; Geography; Socioeconomics; Economics; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.005361100643765516,"score_gpt":0.24874506142302796,"score_spread":0.24338396077926244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602957194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977889,0.00007900078,0.000040000235,0.00014212211,0.0000042540596,0.00013023028,0.00051119237,0.0000030211575,0.0013012978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900608,0.00021241159,0.00032396746,0.00021052035,0.0000100306515,0.00025369588,0.0008612951,0.0000048998163,0.008062362],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997931,0.000677767,0.000042694464,0.00019371738,0.0003813916,0.0007734203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99549294,0.0017054798,0.00059903436,0.0001849459,0.0011561041,0.0008614421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027210603,0.0004456152,0.00048476103,0.0009541151,0.0052094795,0.0016286821,0.0015686629,0.0008743889,0.004373636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032852027,0.00043044324,0.0006919615,0.0018438314,0.0023130311,0.00059101084,0.0008588245,0.0012290078,0.00048945035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041600405,0.015358896,0.8902385,0.00022189146,0.000287735,0.00094712025,0.038472824,0.0029989453,0.0024549696,0.0025102329,0.007027981,0.035320804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055168814,0.0022919553,0.9498139,0.00007085434,0.00009001957,0.000049141985,0.03723155,0.001918724,0.0005587116,0.00020238744,0.0071437582,0.00007732041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9906557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044062834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044062834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035614345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31969976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603206655","doi":"","title":"Campaign Finance in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; Political science; Public administration; Geography","score_opus":0.018136616670076735,"score_gpt":0.23485081333256866,"score_spread":0.21671419666249192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603206655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91605204,0.006677143,0.0000566799,0.01416851,0.00014324671,0.000056524113,0.008929481,0.000022201206,0.0538942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96201676,0.0034837779,0.000064250686,0.0007893634,0.000020662543,0.000029360615,0.0018792463,0.000017443634,0.03169917],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846673,0.000093759685,0.000042399184,0.00006972973,0.0003468601,0.000980645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952819,0.0005411457,0.00049853075,0.00005922277,0.0017075894,0.0019115715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072587264,0.0001880994,0.00045081077,0.0018893695,0.004499221,0.0037685598,0.0007082914,0.0009283021,0.007944305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004898581,0.0002781264,0.00031759293,0.0073020034,0.0012197945,0.0012444692,0.0017575893,0.0013956638,0.00039548677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032754207,0.00023818527,0.7659993,0.0002194504,0.00012229408,0.00058172556,0.026868677,0.0009162325,0.00017829388,0.020817878,0.1183904,0.06534005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016607815,0.00001919108,0.9203528,0.00017083925,0.000027359652,0.000044504835,0.03480338,0.00025885535,0.00010388977,0.00023910771,0.04393581,0.00002775586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99882156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05464328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05464328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06882647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3964666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603273427","doi":"10.3386/w11279","title":"The Impact of Family Income on Child Achievement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; William T. Grant Foundation","keywords":"Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.2592858500279867,"score_gpt":0.5275383290836124,"score_spread":0.2682524790556257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603273427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9577006,0.0020906446,0.00096420763,0.0036700333,0.000061585786,0.00003119147,0.0050766477,0.000034464723,0.03037055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959353,0.0010753218,0.00020193911,0.0001190582,0.000034285295,0.000014683783,0.0007116294,0.0000054958264,0.0019022354],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869305,0.00046592392,0.00005634178,0.00014099576,0.00027028762,0.00037351093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947187,0.0019859388,0.0020671983,0.00025403427,0.0004518148,0.0005223628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012488925,0.00023451274,0.00031868913,0.0009655217,0.0006173165,0.0011417494,0.000429653,0.00035500075,0.00654401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007818829,0.00015574337,0.0005290446,0.0013670588,0.00066100794,0.0007519381,0.0013519645,0.0009464573,0.0005870481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054779735,0.000084042265,0.9697963,0.000042320167,0.00014323134,0.00025034815,0.00032520693,0.00094627345,0.0000968735,0.0038256575,0.0019114327,0.022523463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020667112,0.000033511707,0.99584395,0.000039062197,0.000044615063,0.000090664216,0.00044793912,0.00037982018,0.00014845331,0.0011128348,0.0018517226,0.000005331712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026915489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031158432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026915489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011425855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008017497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05351764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603498655","doi":"","title":"The Correlation Between Husband's and Wife's Education: Canada, 1971-1996","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Correlation; Bivariate analysis; Ordered probit; Wife; Multivariate probit model; Negative correlation; Demographic economics; Demography; Positive correlation; Educational attainment; Psychology; Statistics; Econometrics; Economics; Mathematics; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Economic growth","score_opus":0.029745846143224855,"score_gpt":0.3231989110297669,"score_spread":0.29345306488654205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603498655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8744311,0.0051438366,0.00078427186,0.0030588256,0.00006996267,0.000053561016,0.10321805,0.00009460679,0.013145799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525153,0.003330769,0.00055053347,0.00015799378,0.000031047897,0.000025238896,0.029869787,0.00002283208,0.013496455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987478,0.000069385926,0.000063545805,0.00021107224,0.0005273508,0.00038080206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99317026,0.00078042026,0.0015751668,0.0002598308,0.003437552,0.0007767071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012018209,0.00033004445,0.00057575037,0.0030146241,0.0021104538,0.0018670274,0.0014364956,0.00047988608,0.0051470725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00639116,0.00032908618,0.00046893672,0.010390011,0.0007268854,0.0005890036,0.0011501433,0.0010754956,0.0006054395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109386536,0.000035934136,0.9656433,0.000074924166,0.00011129089,0.00014319281,0.0009583446,0.002122161,0.0000701302,0.00186834,0.010192242,0.018670721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010878277,0.000013215191,0.9846549,0.000048589853,0.00003657304,0.00007082381,0.00081582024,0.0012389077,0.00015613048,0.00015541457,0.012778753,0.000019992573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99707806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99773186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037884917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037884917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03744873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27487564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603615500","doi":"","title":"The Future of Gender","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.017766996507084375,"score_gpt":0.2645462122963238,"score_spread":0.24677921578923942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603615500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023127327,0.19174364,0.00097046926,0.4609872,0.006561941,0.000025851834,0.0005115562,0.000064162996,0.31600788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6819428,0.121257655,0.0018990831,0.05269316,0.00420186,0.00010804971,0.00022371535,0.00011930428,0.13755433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577206,0.0014970726,0.000052198226,0.0004004382,0.0008759496,0.0014022568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925793,0.0030220437,0.00021204744,0.0004268604,0.0018450281,0.0019147111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066270824,0.00079944346,0.001115443,0.0037387204,0.028147442,0.0160292,0.0021164615,0.0049479697,0.020406857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008108056,0.00036683044,0.00045387808,0.005459466,0.049346536,0.009630982,0.0041686227,0.0064545632,0.0009192418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058507376,0.000028905191,0.0016427691,0.00011393153,0.000009741896,0.00007648527,0.031603284,0.00010358043,0.00011400793,0.8463848,0.07681286,0.043051094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016591466,0.000017066968,0.004902596,0.00062484643,0.00001309018,0.000045607725,0.06114083,0.000118927615,0.000060232862,0.10472027,0.8282977,0.00004228533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9284869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95700824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9284869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06722419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13196075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4877479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604049580","doi":"","title":"L'instabilite du revenu des parents seuls, des celibataires et des familles biparentales au Canada, 1984 a 2004","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04477728380915448,"score_gpt":0.32580256645020156,"score_spread":0.2810252826410471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604049580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876974,0.0014455188,0.00024930623,0.00028632782,0.000012267866,0.000025781623,0.005903054,0.000013684254,0.0043665865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98686963,0.001584355,0.00053057505,0.00006937716,0.000004726549,0.000035622328,0.0027661407,0.000006081222,0.008133404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947625,0.000043748572,0.000027857019,0.000069681904,0.00022355595,0.00015895528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965739,0.00035097662,0.0004452633,0.000089734625,0.0020603898,0.00047972362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008051885,0.0002505668,0.00031498494,0.0015776422,0.0019686786,0.0011573618,0.00079827296,0.00018694327,0.002434141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00263011,0.00023072814,0.00030053497,0.0038398597,0.0005727572,0.00032308916,0.0005759567,0.000476009,0.00016228193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013251201,0.0000230083,0.9727629,0.000096558295,0.00012570381,0.00005957891,0.0065723164,0.00028401613,0.00038251805,0.0006457627,0.001431093,0.017484168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002323312,0.000014452797,0.99242073,0.000037476442,0.000030489731,0.000014631392,0.003916798,0.00007913074,0.00014339073,0.000023704675,0.0033101733,0.0000068138265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019665197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019665197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030008012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14268166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604501392","doi":"","title":"Welfare Dynamics in Canada: The Role of Individual Attributes and Economic-policy Variables","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Spell; Welfare; Dynamics (music); Social assistance; Social Welfare; Public economics; Social policy; Social dynamics; Economics; Longitudinal data; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Market economy; Demography","score_opus":0.02068295957667307,"score_gpt":0.2876097009683842,"score_spread":0.26692674139171113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604501392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9571055,0.0026508053,0.0024629824,0.004086536,0.00005499166,0.00013341525,0.02603561,0.00009118611,0.007378902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749033,0.0019638164,0.0018662607,0.00026292703,0.000011870285,0.000077396006,0.01197793,0.000030289406,0.008906167],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984022,0.00028542307,0.000061125626,0.00024326514,0.00032827692,0.00067971536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962394,0.00081590744,0.0006913088,0.00018225385,0.0012240129,0.0008470214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020985934,0.0005426617,0.0008848529,0.0031922976,0.004056052,0.0031632022,0.001636331,0.0007532337,0.00458876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066991523,0.00039514177,0.00094846817,0.009328432,0.0011352396,0.00094949204,0.0016824428,0.001604517,0.000484896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017616364,0.00013631553,0.95025563,0.000061831524,0.00019736128,0.000130466,0.0019951374,0.009293036,0.00012704624,0.008898062,0.008692709,0.020036139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004172443,0.00005257237,0.94387025,0.00014344284,0.0001448548,0.00007157844,0.005248711,0.026828421,0.00030960975,0.0034943803,0.019711697,0.000082725615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99873716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9355972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06440282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0680767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46727735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605294988","doi":"10.56105/cjsae.v15i1.1908","title":"Women's Transitions from Welfare: \"Where Does That Leave Us? Employable or in the Pit?\"","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Sociology; Gender studies; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.025887543370332656,"score_gpt":0.29144957973062346,"score_spread":0.2655620363602908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605294988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8370647,0.005822547,0.0011607247,0.07720442,0.0008081543,0.00005630106,0.00010263287,0.000050370723,0.07773013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725937,0.0029774122,0.00020840798,0.0039073164,0.00013615885,0.00005286548,0.000033390843,0.00003338199,0.020057304],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975399,0.0015058551,0.00003738719,0.00009390002,0.00014683284,0.00067621423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885106,0.0004728307,0.00019455874,0.000052266634,0.00010280095,0.00032653037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026515673,0.00030849507,0.00028283623,0.0006347601,0.014299022,0.0075297994,0.00072855013,0.0018228543,0.0062771975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004737837,0.00023228163,0.000214043,0.0008555175,0.0117742745,0.005060337,0.0067204204,0.0032567559,0.00072119915],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034791636,0.000032425043,0.006416498,0.00006401059,0.0000032438759,0.0005733992,0.95163196,0.000013201336,0.00027551327,0.018288275,0.004800555,0.017866103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019385839,0.000019695488,0.0030590433,0.00011105778,0.0000021309015,0.000110093104,0.9493925,0.000006226133,0.00006556454,0.0007708338,0.04645537,0.000005570339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015108509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029707728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9848915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033454974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040531326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030041099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606477231","doi":"","title":"Summary Of: The Instability of Family Earnings and Family Income in Canada, 1986 to 1991 and 1996 to 2001","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Economics; Context (archaeology); Family income; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Instability; Volatility (finance); Economic stability; Financial economics; Geography; Finance; Economic growth; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.029653179758827468,"score_gpt":0.3038027380775354,"score_spread":0.2741495583187079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606477231","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41435614,0.009084657,0.00024530222,0.0039833174,0.00025010708,0.00019964174,0.54985094,0.00013007715,0.02189991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6542275,0.01202122,0.0007074043,0.00066054147,0.00019631624,0.00019409347,0.28840277,0.000077674085,0.043512553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988607,0.000032538966,0.000067969326,0.00010404827,0.0005813345,0.0003533812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99313956,0.00030516923,0.0009499771,0.00012995419,0.004551935,0.00092341297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096195587,0.0004798819,0.0006462818,0.0050489176,0.0035399057,0.0018171802,0.0011919002,0.00048188597,0.0056090313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035660332,0.0002669328,0.0005058487,0.013483902,0.00043240818,0.00053011294,0.0013565975,0.00074368017,0.0011288088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038082703,0.00007432451,0.8126291,0.000693241,0.00014257689,0.00022282805,0.003318675,0.00091893214,0.00018841324,0.0008526595,0.12441053,0.056167867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004917002,0.000008759813,0.9836379,0.000084464766,0.000012765123,0.00002106852,0.0010077758,0.00008234001,0.00006821326,0.000023115928,0.015035741,0.000012944942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99773836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043455698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043455698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048220318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31529462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606599695","doi":"","title":"Earnings of Couples with High and Low Levels of Education, 1980-2000","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Business; Economics; Labour economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.025363118907494462,"score_gpt":0.3125504945362006,"score_spread":0.2871873756287061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606599695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953395,0.00023591032,0.000028160348,0.00007102585,0.000006018995,0.0000044662625,0.0033347562,0.0000036791628,0.0009765779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906446,0.00028158273,0.00003212007,0.000042782493,0.000012099841,0.000007817037,0.006483828,0.0000020799828,0.002493152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997925,0.000028387103,0.00001924354,0.00003381894,0.000048634807,0.00007752048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901223,0.000121646495,0.0004898826,0.00003616788,0.00014961319,0.00019049148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053667574,0.00019589011,0.00021768696,0.0012450467,0.00043772018,0.00077791436,0.0003071144,0.0003413152,0.0012534597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019473474,0.00013642671,0.00018259959,0.0016336178,0.00023979614,0.00059853244,0.000651728,0.00047811994,0.00050844357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016777092,0.00006827653,0.992486,0.000017953187,0.000030709463,0.00007826599,0.0007906684,0.00014777138,0.00017445683,0.00016461447,0.0010971468,0.0047763763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045257757,0.00003211284,0.9979857,0.0000061321166,0.00001022172,0.000058088423,0.0008034123,0.00007569067,0.000048943817,0.000028941948,0.0009433116,0.000002985612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06627892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08338288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06627892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031295695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13178629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607414586","doi":"10.3386/w11135","title":"How Does Job-Protected Maternity Leave Affect Mothers' Employment and Infant Health?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Maternity leave; Parental leave; Demographic economics; Psychology; Environmental health; Nursing; Medicine; Business; Labour economics; Work (physics); Sick leave; Economics; Communication; Engineering","score_opus":0.21728740702678848,"score_gpt":0.4875320037221494,"score_spread":0.27024459669536094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607414586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99463344,0.0009647679,0.00006266501,0.0018087924,0.000012472241,0.0000068811883,0.0005199965,0.000004172207,0.0019869134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998044,0.00043011035,0.000056761273,0.0001952365,0.000011806751,0.000005069862,0.00022974554,0.0000020062432,0.0010251816],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936956,0.00013410971,0.000020129726,0.000070633796,0.00011385533,0.00029171043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983199,0.0005389264,0.0006152737,0.00008925407,0.00014288219,0.00029362878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010321563,0.00014968302,0.00042279172,0.0003474922,0.0006004591,0.00079962134,0.00056677766,0.00065877876,0.002690189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00361449,0.00015084677,0.0006107908,0.00045111217,0.00048763328,0.00032417057,0.00056725164,0.00053051783,0.00022009017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014898994,0.000055792592,0.9905129,0.00002153346,0.000098527446,0.00013809062,0.00050094427,0.00021685395,0.00031426118,0.00024748524,0.00035495614,0.007389707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044744156,0.00003404097,0.9986098,0.00001442267,0.000033501972,0.000018625202,0.0006011091,0.00011341355,0.000056215842,0.00007838737,0.00043362172,0.0000023923135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45768505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64883655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45768505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031798538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027121452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91004205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608863253","doi":"","title":"Perinatal Family Labour Supply: Historical Trends and the Modern Experience","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Wife; Labour supply; Earnings; Economics; Demographic economics; Baby boom; Labour economics; Census; Population; Demography; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03946694184180337,"score_gpt":0.32279829470276883,"score_spread":0.28333135286096545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608863253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7838361,0.12374649,0.0008897769,0.031106072,0.0004956136,0.00002407527,0.003904498,0.00002174526,0.055975635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88456637,0.10934097,0.00025200893,0.00089949364,0.00039329822,0.0000121049325,0.00080268184,0.000017405555,0.0037156378],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947435,0.000086307264,0.000052180327,0.0001035861,0.0001460099,0.00013758965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984011,0.00034249327,0.00038759012,0.000078516045,0.00041923794,0.0003710815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001452378,0.00013572784,0.0002278753,0.0026572794,0.0014978523,0.0017988057,0.0004939808,0.00042107952,0.0043580784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048394995,0.00017315785,0.000098349214,0.00645854,0.0019972601,0.0025457297,0.0011153319,0.0011575321,0.00030457496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024827413,0.0001119792,0.4064234,0.0010179234,0.00008152015,0.0016990114,0.16101329,0.00065821054,0.00071253127,0.10210295,0.022895422,0.30303547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036035628,0.00008286906,0.64395565,0.0009919741,0.00001668659,0.0013564661,0.051059753,0.00019071241,0.00020716625,0.004709732,0.2973829,0.000042507367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21761338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20648934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21761338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00591342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029091353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43269348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1616586911","doi":"10.1080/08865655.2015.1042009","title":"Female Labor Force Participation and Dependency Ratios in Border States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Borderlands Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dependency ratio; Dependency (UML); Economics; Fertility; Demographic economics; Inequality; Population; Labour economics; Total fertility rate; Demography; Sociology; Family planning; Research methodology","score_opus":0.05109744858826824,"score_gpt":0.37229886623901465,"score_spread":0.3212014176507464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1616586911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990952,0.000076230725,0.000019402245,0.00003289724,0.0000014850723,0.0000013469137,0.000083788254,7.384667e-7,0.0006890577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997687,0.000046787784,0.000010176333,0.000005193717,0.0000022401641,0.0000015682327,0.00006938084,5.4419695e-7,0.000095378375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974304,0.000082489285,0.0000213581,0.000039941173,0.000035127625,0.000078073004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986714,0.00028894504,0.00063750014,0.00005810051,0.00009414702,0.00024986136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004736902,0.00008776481,0.000142051,0.0009347078,0.00043841134,0.00044684045,0.00016925979,0.0001436515,0.0030915255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002617955,0.00008134624,0.00018948384,0.0006643843,0.00028911015,0.00031795955,0.00053433294,0.00027479426,0.00012229149],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041961575,0.000025184017,0.9966413,0.000003820464,0.000014398879,0.00006319546,0.0005555547,0.000044692108,0.000095560914,0.00016718173,0.00008681963,0.002260347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.493467e-7,0.000017047047,0.9987797,0.0000044192457,0.0000035341218,0.00008340779,0.0008054348,0.000065871216,0.000028085544,0.00003373587,0.00017655626,0.0000012990946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01125362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012226368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01125362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002759326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001628241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02237624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1622507769","doi":"10.3917/rfas.021.0073","title":"Portée et limites de la réforme de l'aide sociale aux États-Unis","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue française des affaires sociales","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.060409329575093665,"score_gpt":0.295495451165836,"score_spread":0.23508612159074233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1622507769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7959938,0.009803016,0.00397458,0.04722395,0.00017729923,0.00016136105,0.00059868797,0.000087521235,0.14197978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865617,0.0011694755,0.0007041966,0.0008377284,0.00011581888,0.00006829776,0.00006881229,0.000010118925,0.010463789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889816,0.0048123295,0.00044118369,0.0010148613,0.0023843886,0.0023656099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97309816,0.012255357,0.005941557,0.0016500516,0.0049661044,0.002088834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012624152,0.00025082973,0.00052101293,0.0020705194,0.0026242752,0.0065035676,0.0010140656,0.0015674103,0.013402682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03455368,0.00033284503,0.00046072731,0.0028892006,0.0046928762,0.003608162,0.0034483317,0.0022558374,0.00076957815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009015951,0.0003497106,0.14787237,0.00081370305,0.00022351868,0.0002692671,0.02103719,0.0069854325,0.0022944405,0.6608178,0.009919471,0.14851561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002947826,0.00095000264,0.52459335,0.00228029,0.00043981793,0.00018520796,0.028775102,0.006507863,0.0049759275,0.074026175,0.35684305,0.0001284012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08672457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07924742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08672457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016504785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010445278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17243958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1647816935","doi":"10.1007/s10680-010-9222-x","title":"Where Are the Babies? Labor Market Conditions and Fertility in Europe","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":291,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Fertility; Unemployment; Economics; Total fertility rate; Demographic economics; Birth rate; Labour economics; Population; Demography; Economic growth; Family planning; Research methodology","score_opus":0.015684032625476137,"score_gpt":0.25970612884199756,"score_spread":0.24402209621652143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1647816935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98384905,0.0081161,0.00011268905,0.002605143,0.000044310706,0.0000038800176,0.00024433725,0.0000017415113,0.005022735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99705243,0.0022990822,0.000021926615,0.00017906149,0.00003010824,0.0000025937318,0.00006311533,0.0000013643888,0.00035044533],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923956,0.0003456615,0.000052233783,0.00007505027,0.00006220248,0.00022531439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821705,0.0007676419,0.00051024475,0.00007132464,0.00010620137,0.000327525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020125879,0.00010043472,0.00039685334,0.0012192893,0.0008212427,0.0018990075,0.00043141434,0.00087682257,0.002437049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003867184,0.0001544286,0.00027742353,0.0024483942,0.0015838161,0.0013298121,0.0011980821,0.0006714138,0.0001064969],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004491855,0.0001975343,0.91053295,0.00015033293,0.00021742289,0.0009570422,0.017128466,0.0011209586,0.00034333454,0.028651351,0.0029387649,0.037312713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019593797,0.000087813976,0.9626047,0.0002216903,0.00005071558,0.00036342454,0.023241952,0.0002339438,0.00009461248,0.0035767623,0.009481598,0.000023180723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02616891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031985294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02616891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094371097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010867759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052033186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1653396053","doi":"10.7202/007304ar","title":"Earnings Supplements and Job Quality among Former Welfare Recipients","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; BC Research (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"Sugar Research and Development Corporation","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Demographic economics; Social assistance; Labour economics; Quality (philosophy); Business; Economics; Psychology; Economic growth; Accounting","score_opus":0.038792285615614125,"score_gpt":0.3083412726203591,"score_spread":0.26954898700474494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1653396053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99963284,0.00009096136,0.0000051968955,0.000053959677,0.0000029807477,0.0000015142647,0.000013401916,4.4290115e-7,0.0001986754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995377,0.000063187625,0.000008862554,0.000012795434,0.0000047182552,0.000001484682,0.000020073661,4.4363725e-7,0.00035062415],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996152,0.0001446726,0.000024516485,0.000026503534,0.00006824268,0.00012075611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821836,0.00028290576,0.0007885128,0.000049868824,0.00013079552,0.0005295577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010156487,0.0001422398,0.00020558554,0.00074881467,0.0009320599,0.0007197908,0.00018831778,0.00045110978,0.002393363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033283893,0.00014784015,0.00020360277,0.0003760203,0.00042314676,0.00031332712,0.0005776085,0.0004226303,0.0001849947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061470486,0.00084203284,0.98288614,0.000017457793,0.00003333294,0.00019472522,0.0025271636,0.00006581337,0.000573997,0.00011103767,0.000266655,0.011866773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016766053,0.00052270095,0.995533,0.000013692473,0.000014011033,0.000109402135,0.0031513663,0.00008567424,0.000109231056,0.000053673324,0.00038632596,0.000004176466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061910828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009509366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061910828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038217823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030313057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012310088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W166250571","doi":"","title":"'Mainstream yet?: Women, development and the last quarter century'","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Repository (Kingston University London)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Mainstream; Relevance (law); Inclusion (mineral); Work (physics); Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Environmental ethics; Development economics; Social science; History; Economics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.018160239978255378,"score_gpt":0.25948297301514817,"score_spread":0.24132273303689278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W166250571","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04428428,0.3671651,0.00055301486,0.44179726,0.0033382552,0.000010110712,0.000051606712,0.000029699806,0.14277068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7890791,0.11190091,0.00047472373,0.039626054,0.0022794106,0.000044267454,0.000030359824,0.000053026142,0.056512155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672216,0.0020562715,0.00005310317,0.00024389934,0.00033849414,0.00058599765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809927,0.0010063984,0.00023980493,0.000104892264,0.00015823978,0.0003914099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003948176,0.00044758053,0.0005223901,0.0014950302,0.010594893,0.011201974,0.0007066261,0.003977741,0.008414307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039432487,0.00018296315,0.00020033258,0.0024051974,0.036526155,0.009461256,0.0054480447,0.003947767,0.0005370409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042821688,0.00003661078,0.0016721266,0.00022663109,0.000008153442,0.00034945126,0.21516393,0.00004424745,0.00013857723,0.67455935,0.049102746,0.05865534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011207316,0.000031411437,0.002207864,0.0009507617,0.000005503358,0.0002868278,0.12571043,0.000027760232,0.00011372255,0.09203864,0.77860117,0.0000147874225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021594746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029106209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021594746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008666828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068259556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06288254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1676984392","doi":"10.1007/s00148-015-0557-9","title":"Inter-generational effects of disability benefits: evidence from Canadian social assistance programs","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Anxiety; Cognition; Social policy; Payment; Developmental psychology; Cognitive skill; Economics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.053349180212984015,"score_gpt":0.2962671969217656,"score_spread":0.2429180167087816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1676984392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97104394,0.012361318,0.00014718137,0.0028602006,0.00006344522,0.00010110824,0.0037738073,0.000008451637,0.009640634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991622,0.0047890167,0.00013036188,0.0003183629,0.000022628885,0.000032770735,0.0010493008,0.0000051617817,0.002030491],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99429744,0.0014187889,0.0002268772,0.0005174527,0.0011967322,0.002342822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854661,0.0053072744,0.0031344502,0.00085869356,0.003155884,0.002077576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048440304,0.0005808693,0.00084347185,0.003285646,0.004398939,0.0023574121,0.0026206644,0.0014526214,0.0076011377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015827911,0.0004198576,0.0013708514,0.006805491,0.0023618268,0.00089491997,0.0030532689,0.0016376823,0.00027796841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081283005,0.00048797854,0.9648613,0.00018535466,0.0008372616,0.00031961367,0.0040294267,0.00045488292,0.00011515663,0.0016665987,0.0019213832,0.024308305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060464707,0.00009584389,0.99152434,0.00018075889,0.0005758745,0.000049248767,0.0047032987,0.00018546717,0.0000626997,0.00025481705,0.0022840414,0.000023144417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9831561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021065904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021065904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026147451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15284455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W168741960","doi":"","title":"Effects of New Welfare Reform Strategies on Welfare Participation: Microdata Estimates from Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Welfare; Economics; Unemployment; Demographic economics; Immigration; Unemployment rate; Social Welfare; Public economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Geography; Political science; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.03677970286540949,"score_gpt":0.28640354887690905,"score_spread":0.24962384601149956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W168741960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96067595,0.0006421235,0.0004958341,0.0006206246,0.000009105785,0.00008257694,0.034429718,0.000039842816,0.003004247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686459,0.00093937066,0.0009876869,0.00012275297,0.000007838748,0.000073184456,0.025075119,0.00002097862,0.004127045],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981797,0.00025830948,0.00009797116,0.00022323952,0.000656113,0.0005847152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99542135,0.0008083145,0.000800247,0.0003107843,0.002045178,0.00061414496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015581917,0.0003108312,0.0006364383,0.0018508664,0.0018949853,0.0014913531,0.00093120907,0.00042887003,0.0021482194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005389031,0.00038573693,0.0006928906,0.006140725,0.0006617832,0.00033489836,0.0013022914,0.00073064084,0.00033799102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022054961,0.00007773558,0.96240073,0.0001430832,0.00029724193,0.00014836487,0.002255221,0.0048644436,0.00034570656,0.0010576885,0.008827257,0.019361965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017100374,0.000013305333,0.98958695,0.000036024543,0.000051304527,0.000018764975,0.0016586675,0.002313704,0.00017992924,0.00005523339,0.006045751,0.00002331805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02300531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02300531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025125263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16691595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1698552157","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0351.2010.00390.x","title":"Young children and women's labour force participation in Russia, 1992–2004<sup>1</sup>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics of Transition","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Economics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.006832753705303281,"score_gpt":0.23362609961266292,"score_spread":0.22679334590735964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1698552157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99913776,0.000101832986,0.000013333844,0.00005335023,0.0000023698115,0.0000015512918,0.00030423526,5.396289e-7,0.0003851025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991683,0.00010075916,0.000016031132,0.000008141967,0.0000031036832,0.0000037586171,0.00025729727,5.2207196e-7,0.00044212746],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979025,0.00005044501,0.000015861759,0.000026898362,0.00003065337,0.00008591066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994124,0.00010912487,0.0003292308,0.000017841638,0.000050026614,0.00008137354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051663973,0.000081799815,0.00016217519,0.00061162264,0.0003459923,0.00048289303,0.00020575555,0.00019704875,0.001606547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010652773,0.00008874839,0.00019118923,0.00062026264,0.0002448565,0.00017034067,0.00044296886,0.00028067836,0.0002300711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056536708,0.000018749419,0.9951426,0.000015677399,0.000018324454,0.00009153546,0.0014473059,0.00009481101,0.0002500273,0.000099449535,0.00018997525,0.0025751127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.144466e-7,0.0000137244815,0.9986589,0.0000063574053,0.000004508617,0.00004328085,0.0007716738,0.000027672888,0.00004557752,0.000012317736,0.0004143176,9.008106e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032123722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04923712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032123722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007256095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004582882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06387347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1699555348","doi":"","title":"Pensioners' travel concessions - a misallocation of resources","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; TRIPS architecture; Business; Order (exchange); Quarter (Canadian coin); Pension; Public transport; Cash; Economics; Labour economics; Public economics; Finance; Market economy","score_opus":0.025391376882159956,"score_gpt":0.2514882462829759,"score_spread":0.22609686940081594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1699555348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54651386,0.0028769716,0.01826902,0.0401648,0.0010961591,0.00015693199,0.000803319,0.00045808876,0.38966087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9410014,0.000664559,0.0022031437,0.0018961203,0.00014753234,0.00004479577,0.00018063716,0.00007037303,0.0537915],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971584,0.0009555102,0.00017093345,0.00039613558,0.0008459061,0.0004731278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633235,0.0009540469,0.0005598463,0.0009889647,0.0006599011,0.0005048898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002868769,0.0003344386,0.00029329676,0.0010623579,0.0020708386,0.003244105,0.00075398054,0.0012255465,0.02146734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014345038,0.0003434925,0.00040428893,0.00076373434,0.0021666505,0.003134055,0.0028395809,0.0018105978,0.0031138654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045151138,0.00031720143,0.059207536,0.00033608306,0.00021657752,0.0018512082,0.011046169,0.0044396548,0.0037796528,0.3699743,0.14983493,0.39854527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009920347,0.0003496598,0.097725086,0.00083697547,0.00007725937,0.0025328232,0.015467662,0.004711345,0.0029411654,0.13153562,0.7435109,0.00021237426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008495086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011249944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02146734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002482853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017409862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07181537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1741206749","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2029237","title":"How Can Bill and Melinda Gates Increase Other People’s Donations to Fund Public Goods?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Business; Donation; Fund raising; Public administration; Finance; Economic growth; Economics; Public economics; Marketing; Political science; Microeconomics; Higher education","score_opus":0.023622788598801667,"score_gpt":0.27338589328037455,"score_spread":0.24976310468157287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1741206749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13576846,0.0011547793,0.0016827165,0.40510467,0.0022546577,0.000077092816,0.00013352469,0.00010416362,0.45371997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8677396,0.0009252992,0.0010618968,0.049488913,0.00042254344,0.00007402807,0.00004782424,0.000075148746,0.080164745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724495,0.0010219204,0.00003361353,0.00017460845,0.00046270934,0.0010621666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99247193,0.0033859394,0.0004398482,0.00047132245,0.0009206812,0.0023102325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033943388,0.00027641235,0.00032856516,0.00094975723,0.0048229974,0.006696025,0.0008370932,0.0052628815,0.044013835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022621287,0.00023777761,0.00046504103,0.0010425856,0.0043957573,0.008022116,0.0030798786,0.003773927,0.0026836735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002510751,0.0004661329,0.0118729295,0.000121069796,0.000069730384,0.00039655733,0.00547443,0.00037772107,0.0006097202,0.7133528,0.18655652,0.08045147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020910519,0.0001967789,0.021429978,0.0004355997,0.000121170706,0.00041079108,0.025019612,0.0011451007,0.0017521393,0.2696194,0.6795364,0.00012388424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018430065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034481797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044013835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003886669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007482642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14724094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1748798060","doi":"10.3280/spe2010-001001","title":"Abolishing poverty: the history and significance of the North American Guaranteed Annual Income Social Experiments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Period (music); Politics; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Social science; History; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Art","score_opus":0.017609307399046023,"score_gpt":0.26540776806849564,"score_spread":0.2477984606694496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1748798060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47230232,0.012424006,0.0021525922,0.08392196,0.00091308926,0.00013401173,0.00017967168,0.00007500542,0.4278973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621017,0.00463509,0.0009929794,0.0072152973,0.00011094206,0.00014689028,0.00004394609,0.000027726179,0.0247254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561936,0.0022996299,0.00007157586,0.00035489417,0.0007524203,0.0009021013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898095,0.0066378484,0.00043355513,0.00064668746,0.0017067414,0.0007656963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006118732,0.0002045855,0.00032555437,0.0012443673,0.017215053,0.003160694,0.0010289433,0.0015989306,0.0025016873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012655348,0.00024950452,0.00019217326,0.0012890808,0.027256457,0.0018692341,0.0026391328,0.0033798555,0.000116090916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022261856,0.00023854258,0.010274962,0.00016747782,0.000028576515,0.00023361304,0.078033194,0.0004520159,0.0009289437,0.77368003,0.033289447,0.10245054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054088003,0.00018506945,0.06486318,0.00054009317,0.000038173726,0.00008302297,0.057383623,0.00038119682,0.0019656664,0.06372243,0.81069297,0.00009054322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7279698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88808984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7279698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044539027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039640017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5472644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1765037568","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2256147","title":"Wage Differentials of Males and Females in Same-Sex and Different-Sex Couples in Canada, 2006-2010","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Sex segregation; Psychology; Demographic economics; Demography; Economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.01208164622761321,"score_gpt":0.23424474406632484,"score_spread":0.22216309783871163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1765037568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881749,0.001490847,0.00005064431,0.00057161803,0.0000353058,0.0000116397405,0.007509222,0.00001042067,0.0021451996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918942,0.0008213716,0.00005509608,0.00010135256,0.0000102119375,0.000006751777,0.0030703438,0.000004581134,0.00403617],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993948,0.000030696963,0.000030429275,0.00008322127,0.0001451456,0.00031579958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886984,0.00004979702,0.00017399443,0.000018833558,0.00044622037,0.00044130866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003725473,0.0002253478,0.00041671653,0.0013918491,0.0023800386,0.0009071477,0.0011252792,0.0005578447,0.0034282922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011165034,0.00024038901,0.0005229964,0.0027375952,0.00057462923,0.00037289178,0.00086246396,0.0007575676,0.00036425708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026573119,0.00005506727,0.9801388,0.00005949747,0.00008003572,0.00013801173,0.003095098,0.00019751798,0.0002695894,0.00049995555,0.004475281,0.010725403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002956707,0.000010331285,0.99572104,0.000018523851,0.000008322174,0.000030750154,0.0026552011,0.00008723763,0.000040467407,0.000016609407,0.001402768,0.0000058180967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9926605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99708444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012519523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012519523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013399107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09083593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1786593012","doi":"10.3386/w29041","title":"The Decline of Drudgery and the Paradox of Hard Work","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University; University of Michigan; Brown University","keywords":"Work (physics); Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.29959205930714017,"score_gpt":0.5016455162748077,"score_spread":0.20205345696766752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1786593012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38985685,0.004726656,0.0053990735,0.11096197,0.0002687028,0.00002258538,0.00047232042,0.00011654816,0.48817524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772026,0.0011507497,0.0005579086,0.00344958,0.00016111006,0.000015919988,0.000066977984,0.00003328355,0.017361853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935,0.00023552492,0.000021200862,0.000099542434,0.0001436675,0.00014997898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954229,0.0016515662,0.0008070971,0.0005272937,0.0005598086,0.0010312888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019607262,0.00014674537,0.00030675824,0.001408116,0.0021661299,0.00290655,0.00058488006,0.0011735801,0.018847123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010401932,0.00017025947,0.0002294564,0.0013737542,0.0056914063,0.004066884,0.002752174,0.0020274026,0.00160532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016981064,0.00017355464,0.01998746,0.00010235477,0.000014796935,0.00024725354,0.008451577,0.00091447495,0.0007452781,0.8386139,0.03134986,0.09922964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005714735,0.00008168371,0.063829444,0.00013390808,0.000008397109,0.00040480707,0.0059715677,0.0014090803,0.00021801068,0.7979868,0.12987214,0.000027075142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006581156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006084401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018847123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018343689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011072387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06304997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1790435558","doi":"10.1596/1813-9450-6148","title":"Reforming Subsidies: A Tool-Kit for Policy Simulations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Computer science; Economics; Business; Environmental economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.034774264437995646,"score_gpt":0.30598462095529755,"score_spread":0.2712103565173019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1790435558","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058184043,0.00028038785,0.91310936,0.0009970624,0.00021239051,0.0004956584,0.012160378,0.038736995,0.028189318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06267307,0.0008574267,0.90144974,0.00034800294,0.000092204216,0.0035751916,0.008002126,0.010280519,0.012721785],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988432,0.0006334315,0.00013727792,0.00010195473,0.00022206779,0.000062087856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863992,0.011714549,0.00035937328,0.00078143255,0.0005636499,0.00018183498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00381276,0.0012258599,0.0010899765,0.0018769447,0.000573286,0.002144897,0.0020125734,0.0013584838,0.06633845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018101746,0.0012590854,0.0010229489,0.0021123888,0.0005925207,0.0023899977,0.0021601943,0.0022086913,0.011260279],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021055485,0.0002863218,0.0038101259,0.0009612276,0.00022313709,0.00044896075,0.00057756464,0.54368085,0.0009977462,0.15141763,0.13682581,0.16056012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000290688,0.000036213005,0.00057738036,0.00025871198,0.000048448557,0.00013508312,0.000115730625,0.7416827,0.0016702124,0.15526684,0.09985503,0.00006300368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032865193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044401414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06633845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00102874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013133998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22192425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1795115279","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1491505","title":"Social Jealousy and Stigma - Negative Externalities of Social Assistance Payments in Germany","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Payment; Jealousy; Stigma (botany); Social assistance; Social stigma; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Criminology; Psychiatry; Economic growth; Microeconomics; Medicine; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)","score_opus":0.012835535274260148,"score_gpt":0.29220009494914917,"score_spread":0.27936455967488905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1795115279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984274,0.0001746247,0.000012683703,0.00028637858,0.000006177901,0.0000016230989,0.000050938725,0.0000011486687,0.0010389925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997539,0.0000626351,0.0000042169704,0.000014949192,0.000002558393,0.0000010034809,0.000018668126,3.166842e-7,0.00014188349],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901426,0.00027279102,0.000051323026,0.00007009923,0.00009197206,0.00049955945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984938,0.00031974135,0.00055855646,0.00005586366,0.0000847889,0.00048721783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071092776,0.00019253182,0.00022039424,0.0013741192,0.001040717,0.0014012267,0.0002612725,0.00060452323,0.0024640055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002780978,0.00014693747,0.0002810795,0.0014353121,0.0010883933,0.0007687847,0.0017722583,0.0007072405,0.00013899073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005080705,0.0003759645,0.96389073,0.000074414675,0.00019984506,0.0013739166,0.008435015,0.0009935091,0.00043769457,0.006995294,0.001207076,0.015508404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009898661,0.000060057457,0.99098325,0.00004396576,0.000054383378,0.00023548407,0.0064052525,0.00038387132,0.00012034865,0.0005659473,0.00112001,0.000017435763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039232437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052817326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039232437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002031912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016473981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078008175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1810989105","doi":"10.21696/rcsl072014585","title":"La configuración de la maternidad a través de la inversión social en los niños. Ejemplos de Canadá y México","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de El Colegio de San Luis","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.008732888998361705,"score_gpt":0.29144794714581185,"score_spread":0.2827150581474501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1810989105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96685714,0.0006611686,0.00047442544,0.0030023113,0.00001999632,0.000024494255,0.00026963052,0.000010952639,0.028680021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99645656,0.00050252106,0.00015290461,0.00010714871,0.0000054671827,0.000017738472,0.000053539905,0.000003955705,0.0027001358],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886215,0.0003379322,0.000017421184,0.00012739771,0.00012560716,0.0005295067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991467,0.0001412321,0.00024284414,0.00005127249,0.00017788929,0.00023997828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010132731,0.00018616239,0.00024038213,0.00089233625,0.006240969,0.0028417937,0.000543722,0.00046383555,0.003430546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002233223,0.00020209071,0.00018129809,0.0014895238,0.00489488,0.00085160095,0.0030441787,0.0008639737,0.00012549933],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000279691,0.00006956366,0.5396621,0.00012186235,0.00007015386,0.0016818537,0.3305499,0.0004022783,0.001621975,0.06713536,0.0029061153,0.05549916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012895568,0.00006716372,0.7136449,0.0002185082,0.00004864899,0.0003478294,0.24878228,0.0002147657,0.00035415028,0.0041356236,0.032138888,0.000034353438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66229445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78648365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33770555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015394008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013931551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67938876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1814024343","doi":"10.25336/p6xw4v","title":"Reproductive Choices in Gibraltar: A Case Study of a Community In Transition, 1960-1996","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Politics; Transition (genetics); Sociology; Structuring; Economic growth; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.08167978856203234,"score_gpt":0.36742987816964345,"score_spread":0.2857500896076111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1814024343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982135,0.00020761068,0.00003770055,0.00018458779,0.0000033640576,0.000020175743,0.000045387245,0.0000026506116,0.0012850034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977342,0.00043248053,0.00016033906,0.00013987756,0.0000041574267,0.000013287638,0.00007516323,0.0000025351048,0.0014379934],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995202,0.00016827739,0.000013356745,0.00004305471,0.000041161253,0.00021405077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995752,0.00011736733,0.00006251822,0.00002048859,0.000056510686,0.0001678854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053920713,0.0003458897,0.0003158498,0.001321393,0.006741758,0.0013269938,0.0009597158,0.0011305921,0.0028156047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012028075,0.0002603728,0.00020454124,0.0019050473,0.0016213506,0.00047243744,0.0018846358,0.0008695662,0.00029290863],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005952095,0.0005751563,0.2756315,0.00029168872,0.000067843364,0.09704623,0.55981654,0.00042260287,0.0039765094,0.0037784835,0.0023065412,0.055491712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055183566,0.00064281607,0.2574456,0.0001393749,0.000055757955,0.010641355,0.71932876,0.000457038,0.0005267026,0.00039677526,0.010269342,0.000041246825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51600593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.753055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51600593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006361798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002774874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97368884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1817140984","doi":"10.7202/029301ar","title":"Male-Female Pay Inequity and Public Policy in Canada and the U.S.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Face value; Perspective (graphical); Public policy; Value (mathematics); Face (sociological concept); Economics; Public economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Social science; Accounting; Finance","score_opus":0.028301912200555893,"score_gpt":0.26385237633128733,"score_spread":0.23555046413073144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1817140984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6984586,0.043570664,0.000360394,0.10671569,0.00038067877,0.00005234241,0.0016501057,0.00003096017,0.1487806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821039,0.006648882,0.00015056704,0.0028813803,0.00005241179,0.00001135916,0.0001843321,0.000007336277,0.0079597905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692255,0.00025925238,0.00004754878,0.00012860191,0.0009953477,0.0016467678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968093,0.0005563348,0.00030638068,0.000045897646,0.0010790568,0.0012029862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018819834,0.00015369848,0.0003391233,0.0028797113,0.011047044,0.0041118446,0.00073421944,0.0010856775,0.0042348476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004489915,0.00013850888,0.00027674198,0.006224875,0.003940517,0.00086240313,0.0015313625,0.0014803988,0.00011844412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031443956,0.00024837913,0.30114648,0.00044341286,0.000107330176,0.00066822645,0.026027411,0.0020499013,0.00045109502,0.38521686,0.0625657,0.22076079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003502022,0.00005816042,0.78396535,0.0007923872,0.000061123435,0.00013933769,0.05489718,0.0011499955,0.0003561837,0.011552223,0.14689527,0.000097812364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11374093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11374093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14113858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82525206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1819795793","doi":"10.1111/caje.12132","title":"The effect of universal child benefits on labour supply","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Labour supply; Economics; Child labour; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Significant difference; Medicine; Internal medicine; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.059108668858203844,"score_gpt":0.19313148301020644,"score_spread":0.1340228141520026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1819795793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95372844,0.0029765975,0.0016361711,0.0031138908,0.00013215293,0.000114417926,0.009395826,0.00008756402,0.028814998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915617,0.00048320126,0.00035377595,0.00015382143,0.00002051498,0.000020368301,0.0013644813,0.000007903106,0.0060342494],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962565,0.00069902826,0.000095273455,0.0003216203,0.0011471707,0.0014804879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99457365,0.002263734,0.0009614447,0.00033666176,0.0011790736,0.00068545144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022879099,0.00026995334,0.000674536,0.0008003959,0.0008537015,0.00093597645,0.0009669298,0.0004379387,0.010538381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012038191,0.00019507205,0.0009098597,0.0014407584,0.0010974642,0.00028916058,0.0012279933,0.0010896459,0.00036261894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015590622,0.00024337975,0.8809758,0.000371381,0.0007806631,0.00056984904,0.0013397802,0.011492192,0.0014336535,0.01594497,0.009066635,0.07622272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038208287,0.00014617723,0.9859196,0.0000869229,0.00022115654,0.000052281997,0.0009214751,0.002193356,0.00059597864,0.00085458055,0.008950715,0.000019621255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9359997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06400031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013671449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013639742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12875438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1833480845","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v8n8p42","title":"Income Generating Activities of Rural Kenyan Women","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pennsylvania State University; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Livelihood; Kenya; Economic growth; Work (physics); Household income; Business; Order (exchange); Economics; Socioeconomics; Agriculture; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.01751938688345989,"score_gpt":0.26326094853775567,"score_spread":0.24574156165429578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1833480845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994886,0.00029770003,0.000019064115,0.00034634798,0.0000047105973,0.000011105353,0.00005183059,8.843171e-7,0.0043822825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967763,0.00096040615,0.00006285599,0.00012458263,0.000005488708,0.000022204627,0.000042321793,0.0000011822736,0.002004735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997733,0.00007629185,0.000010193203,0.000020047855,0.000024906123,0.000095181094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968636,0.000086009524,0.0000969198,0.000007741727,0.000034602766,0.00008840332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003903098,0.000251302,0.00017328023,0.0007763854,0.0035498433,0.00095113774,0.00025280012,0.0003692651,0.004885563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010169152,0.00021923418,0.000113562775,0.00076529523,0.00091658096,0.00077857065,0.0010516143,0.0003330758,0.0004997632],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018988173,0.00039459523,0.48649704,0.00020476428,0.000017509363,0.002289751,0.4613128,0.00007602747,0.0041004107,0.0020874965,0.0020509358,0.040778767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011740368,0.000243538,0.43222237,0.00018962743,0.00001599424,0.0009637017,0.54831374,0.0000948902,0.00036340632,0.00038219898,0.017165268,0.00003347883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017602244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04465785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017602244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008422618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008534181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03499955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1836543710","doi":"10.3386/w10138","title":"Regeneration, Labour Supply and the Welfare Costs of Taxes","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Regeneration (biology); Welfare; Business; Labour economics; Labour supply; Natural resource economics; Economics; Public economics; Market economy; Biology","score_opus":0.17077967866454866,"score_gpt":0.4636319316505977,"score_spread":0.292852252986049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1836543710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8786879,0.0008773827,0.053209983,0.0034410744,0.000042083935,0.000114744,0.00071276375,0.0000720122,0.062841915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893489,0.00041629726,0.0032894094,0.00011189363,0.000012492359,0.000047717152,0.00015642196,0.000013982842,0.006602849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992482,0.00033201138,0.000025905856,0.00008742251,0.00015023124,0.00015627105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981907,0.0010145704,0.00034760384,0.0002637613,0.0001242543,0.000059206403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012181016,0.0002681127,0.00040182524,0.00066151615,0.00066793576,0.0015101978,0.0006585797,0.0007504212,0.008144669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067914887,0.0002054989,0.0004895292,0.0009977996,0.0018744672,0.00199139,0.0011805209,0.0009435114,0.0003432771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038981653,0.00029427712,0.03825638,0.00013879943,0.000062571475,0.0003287338,0.0007268355,0.21048975,0.0017164528,0.6766765,0.002861498,0.068058416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007029624,0.00026784022,0.04225076,0.00017980157,0.000054624215,0.00056386855,0.0026520966,0.12234221,0.003137095,0.80406356,0.024375327,0.000042492484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00551531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006952978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008144669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031391375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012300238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027246654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1839284494","doi":"10.25336/p6hs43","title":"Early life transitions of Canadian youth: effects of family transformation and community characteristics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Transition (genetics); American Community Survey; Demography; Life course approach; Set (abstract data type); Demographic economics; Psychology; Geography; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Population; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.06004204300571237,"score_gpt":0.2905724434372818,"score_spread":0.23053040043156942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1839284494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996639,0.0008677714,0.00004710838,0.00017151471,0.0000069075422,0.000012745849,0.000854592,0.00000590839,0.0013942878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841523,0.00043102395,0.000057099955,0.000021482885,0.0000024196959,0.0000046430846,0.0006389411,0.0000024937735,0.0004266295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897814,0.00010012909,0.000026720207,0.00012362488,0.00024123,0.00053020095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819845,0.00018293348,0.0003508217,0.000077440374,0.00052894343,0.0006614273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008433488,0.00033994287,0.00035981982,0.0019677735,0.0028307093,0.0014211886,0.0008504749,0.00040274372,0.0018684878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037455538,0.0002236299,0.00057474046,0.0024232976,0.0007989743,0.00045497902,0.0012969626,0.00068937865,0.00012790569],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025306575,0.000057249035,0.9821306,0.000022722306,0.000052439464,0.00018552509,0.0032519102,0.00019192648,0.00029519023,0.0002753158,0.00042198927,0.012862167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012361427,0.000015832182,0.9979184,0.000008777147,0.000006518392,0.00002520862,0.0015555898,0.000059287482,0.00003697506,0.000017282311,0.0003502438,0.0000047135686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9768534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9886457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02314663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0121415295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014907274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08809334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1846069906","doi":"10.25336/p6cd0j","title":"Changes in Economic Status and Timing of Marriage of Young Canadians","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Earnings; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Demographic economics; Panel data; Economics; Demography; Longitudinal data; Sociology","score_opus":0.04456176866536112,"score_gpt":0.31796668863735583,"score_spread":0.27340491997199473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1846069906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947255,0.00047896654,0.000039521845,0.00023127416,0.000010071858,0.000014147763,0.0027129299,0.0000040120735,0.0017834214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978289,0.0002507429,0.00005031346,0.000029317622,0.00000389362,0.0000043863283,0.0011242351,0.0000018397353,0.0007063202],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992933,0.00005200958,0.000025996791,0.00009818678,0.0001914186,0.00033903072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768,0.00016259214,0.00050486455,0.000070705086,0.0009017839,0.00068009965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009921594,0.000200345,0.00031088424,0.0022983502,0.0024827053,0.0012493697,0.00090339605,0.00047802352,0.0023187832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004942868,0.00027967585,0.00047050655,0.0034831446,0.00051882095,0.00036947321,0.0007296375,0.0007038014,0.00022822166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009591197,0.000023041606,0.99428326,0.000012243724,0.000026695994,0.00006303939,0.001097332,0.00009313331,0.00008670671,0.00016716485,0.0004081563,0.0036431986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021674216,0.0000102696495,0.9983896,0.000009508286,0.0000051965935,0.000017951677,0.0009479856,0.00009709686,0.000017687527,0.00001850447,0.00047905854,0.000005134161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98460996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9911765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0153900385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010745209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011274485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07796234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1847338122","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720090501.001","title":"Power Relations and Contraceptive Use: Gender Differentials in Bangladesh","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Power (physics); Gender relations; Ethnology; Humanities; Gender studies; Demography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022635297505476576,"score_gpt":0.2778484065448296,"score_spread":0.255213109039353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1847338122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938386,0.0006968488,0.00025786986,0.00037149002,0.0000064322558,0.000013972654,0.0001145462,0.0000013928105,0.0046989615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992022,0.00028162953,0.000050280374,0.000023011273,0.0000032334895,0.0000071721333,0.000025391995,7.1786314e-7,0.00040647094],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913603,0.00038921123,0.000055465156,0.00011100339,0.00017665951,0.00013163903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974784,0.0015741602,0.0005505229,0.00011025232,0.00012598895,0.00016057963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013320702,0.00016195173,0.00023034854,0.0008440993,0.00069506746,0.00084589527,0.00023324904,0.0003245494,0.006621506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00602385,0.00015152359,0.00017609414,0.001444238,0.0012448977,0.0008549902,0.00097545027,0.0003621389,0.00033068197],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011538552,0.00007028497,0.93858165,0.000090301066,0.00004325303,0.0003876245,0.035714492,0.00012602152,0.000690484,0.0030213255,0.00028366013,0.02087554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071860554,0.0001131816,0.9638193,0.00008183073,0.000018799574,0.000367879,0.030981446,0.00030401684,0.00014351976,0.0015278817,0.0026209478,0.000014107112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016437149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0142385205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016437149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008610693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004978229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032682955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1847679129","doi":"10.1111/roiw.12112","title":"Poverty Dynamics in <scp>T</scp>urkey","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Income and Wealth","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Panel data; Poverty rate; Demographic economics; Dynamics (music); Development economics; Labour economics; Econometrics; Economic growth; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.0127199454302348,"score_gpt":0.2933848083416713,"score_spread":0.2806648629114365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1847679129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847927,0.0018216239,0.0002652613,0.00041956708,0.000016145961,0.000012512903,0.006440409,0.000011368598,0.006220324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99044716,0.0020872059,0.00016863116,0.00011949886,0.000009113167,0.00003330382,0.0038743208,0.0000070464157,0.0032537507],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966824,0.00007730628,0.000017222044,0.000057876983,0.000041113988,0.00013817367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995716,0.00006941667,0.00019155338,0.00002531384,0.000082321596,0.000059691345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040904852,0.00010574633,0.00028155933,0.0009921447,0.00052175316,0.0012306196,0.0002643036,0.00026406607,0.0025922465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008443016,0.00011555537,0.00024777892,0.002634197,0.0002638464,0.000888019,0.0012639674,0.0003643559,0.0004899047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001997625,0.00008378976,0.9084424,0.0003201131,0.00025057452,0.00080008776,0.005017741,0.0022118883,0.00042834517,0.007437821,0.018531695,0.05627568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020521343,0.00003675837,0.9807508,0.00011453764,0.00002194026,0.00019015501,0.0034403037,0.000374648,0.00013176992,0.00035548408,0.0145702185,0.000011321268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05690218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09201072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05690218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011329893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008361449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113141954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1848086556","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.00498.x","title":"How does the marriage market clear? An empirical framework","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Marriage market; Matching (statistics); Statistic; Economics; Famine; Propensity score matching; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12038267836231122,"score_gpt":0.22610777478655603,"score_spread":0.10572509642424481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1848086556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67837065,0.021186804,0.034749303,0.07383561,0.00023986657,0.00038785857,0.0037064345,0.00016113304,0.18736237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899738,0.002039318,0.0019103572,0.0008407925,0.00014762272,0.0000859985,0.0005223707,0.000019663667,0.0044601145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971397,0.0014196241,0.00012391554,0.0004588981,0.00045150227,0.00040649527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824386,0.011318382,0.0035540292,0.00075959467,0.00095172034,0.0009777496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006120028,0.0003745606,0.0013452409,0.003108732,0.002650995,0.0073457505,0.0021096156,0.0029261948,0.030316653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024512907,0.00040987055,0.00066115346,0.0054609836,0.005755745,0.011370486,0.0045074318,0.003076184,0.0012511571],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008865003,0.0003717315,0.052656867,0.00019441028,0.00006251369,0.0003173148,0.0025717076,0.0023849413,0.00007034926,0.908526,0.0052542523,0.027501231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095940355,0.00014037616,0.066524126,0.00052023656,0.000094669995,0.00025775284,0.017003227,0.027637402,0.00014593094,0.84605736,0.041449502,0.000073413474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009408949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058798087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030316653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029334368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022148655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10141933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1849009696","doi":"10.25336/p6ng60","title":"Determinants of women's non-family work in Ghana and Zimbabwe","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Fertility; Work (physics); Developing country; Demographic economics; Informal sector; Economic growth; Survey data collection; Formal education; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Population; Economics; Demography","score_opus":0.034678473792609896,"score_gpt":0.30929152965039164,"score_spread":0.27461305585778173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1849009696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99835974,0.0005177045,0.000029667528,0.00020742138,0.0000026946504,0.000007317062,0.00009601807,8.336746e-7,0.0007786125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950373,0.00022989204,0.00002306643,0.000010536116,0.0000016806016,0.000005062347,0.00003654134,6.087305e-7,0.00018902165],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996456,0.000118916716,0.00001558499,0.000025757134,0.000048799084,0.0001452478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925655,0.00020669049,0.00033145133,0.000021795842,0.00004880424,0.00013468153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003769229,0.000196311,0.00017175372,0.00091375044,0.0006462615,0.0006820055,0.0002501512,0.00014939344,0.0023733026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021815223,0.0001347091,0.00013633684,0.0014961354,0.0005400106,0.00039101462,0.0006334492,0.00027841105,0.00013733249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004258535,0.00003330706,0.98598856,0.000033530894,0.000016664726,0.00027124624,0.004066708,0.000060322407,0.0002662151,0.00044697325,0.00021149736,0.008562462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030399997,0.000015968264,0.9952186,0.000027587368,0.0000042045435,0.00007986546,0.0038965784,0.00006763668,0.0000305011,0.00006136135,0.00059293886,0.000001763403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09514643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1511038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09514643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008160045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005068588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1891852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W18500272","doi":"","title":"Unemployment, Gender and Labor Force Participation in Spain: Future Trends in Labor Market","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Economics; Recession; Quarter (Canadian coin); Business cycle; Labour economics; Unemployment rate; Discouraged worker; Percentage point; Demographic economics; Beveridge curve; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.033716026198312765,"score_gpt":0.2837358013950114,"score_spread":0.25001977519669866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W18500272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895321,0.0040834085,0.00017531552,0.00053630635,0.000028691316,0.0000053988365,0.0027729927,0.000012775761,0.00285305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950942,0.001083017,0.00008297972,0.00005518939,0.000030585186,0.000007051749,0.0020259195,0.000007629683,0.0016134157],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997434,0.000051978397,0.00001602299,0.00005491699,0.00003309602,0.00010055119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933654,0.00011931712,0.00025146228,0.00003730161,0.00014288536,0.00011250851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094970065,0.00019379768,0.00034325925,0.0009693843,0.00016930902,0.0007129208,0.00026815463,0.0004802434,0.0025698605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014388368,0.00008565412,0.00055310223,0.0012425967,0.00016538322,0.00028220244,0.0003845275,0.0002809726,0.0006176458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018516307,0.000036725538,0.98349136,0.000048721548,0.000058808204,0.000099864934,0.0005240833,0.00032139424,0.000172256,0.00023067927,0.0012105198,0.013620465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035619862,0.000025335718,0.9968641,0.000032022555,0.000012176004,0.0000408359,0.00057028077,0.00022282734,0.000030897663,0.000058145,0.0021361688,0.0000037245018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029541237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030978702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029541237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058346667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004165652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05873853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1857457866","doi":"10.7202/010050ar","title":"L’évolution de la situation économique des familles avec enfants au Canada et au Québec depuis 15 ans","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Poverty; Economic inequality; Demographic economics; Economics; Family income; Income distribution; Affect (linguistics); Welfare economics; Household income; Inequality; Geography; Economic growth; Sociology","score_opus":0.010408004977158774,"score_gpt":0.23582664107901283,"score_spread":0.22541863610185406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1857457866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944384,0.000789739,0.00014341011,0.00035886394,0.0000069631537,0.000013962645,0.0011282881,0.000007361756,0.0031130286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99470335,0.0006012774,0.00021141735,0.000046012003,0.0000030017386,0.00001561759,0.00048078207,0.0000028773002,0.0039355922],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995378,0.000058856025,0.000014063695,0.00006443316,0.0000907414,0.00023406878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987357,0.000106408566,0.00023592424,0.00002488972,0.0006645933,0.00023239019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049104996,0.0001864779,0.00021688663,0.0015424606,0.002928114,0.001181543,0.00053364225,0.00030830601,0.003698805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001350868,0.00013057854,0.00028716357,0.0024543912,0.00064270326,0.00046828366,0.00058381713,0.0003377649,0.00016980374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009616986,0.000027112816,0.95296526,0.000075556025,0.00006130232,0.00024727063,0.019760637,0.0003257888,0.00069917174,0.0008627523,0.0014160239,0.02346284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011631525,0.000020283353,0.98464096,0.000026530126,0.00001048355,0.00003685936,0.011810671,0.00009387886,0.00007932005,0.000026923175,0.0032438545,0.000009094839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02544978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02544978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019393465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18465197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1882077733","doi":"10.3233/jem-150414","title":"Measuring time use in household surveys","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic and Social Measurement","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Economics","score_opus":0.24461691788575257,"score_gpt":0.28124446465135244,"score_spread":0.03662754676559987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1882077733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7216408,0.007280712,0.16156808,0.0065189837,0.0011031008,0.0014726361,0.029858572,0.0004095303,0.07014757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8900002,0.005005136,0.08368394,0.0013606875,0.00035785892,0.002632306,0.011299472,0.00005895115,0.0056013316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98347247,0.011181221,0.0011310411,0.00096546934,0.0027614788,0.00048838445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97198343,0.012723058,0.006738419,0.0029736008,0.0048053763,0.0007761363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010997585,0.0003318824,0.00045905687,0.0038813727,0.00090986444,0.0014188428,0.00095569546,0.00051176135,0.0030909404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055418435,0.0002687525,0.00045133344,0.009857761,0.0005568784,0.002377996,0.0015191495,0.00077320513,0.00087736925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012541773,0.00029030058,0.67937386,0.00088484975,0.00043017522,0.00009036982,0.0095096985,0.004056815,0.0010140721,0.02567315,0.022096861,0.2564544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003496357,0.000557262,0.80910677,0.0012810315,0.00017636718,0.00024353739,0.01680051,0.0071150674,0.0026946028,0.017828548,0.14401866,0.00014264218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022081893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024372894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022081893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018289142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001950786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058161438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1883522681","doi":"","title":"Marriage, Motherhood and Masculinity in the Global Economy: Reconfigurations of Personal and Economic Life","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Injustice; Earnings; Unpaid work; Globalization; Masculinity; Ideology; Power (physics); Resistance (ecology); Work (physics); Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Economics; Market economy; Politics","score_opus":0.05246366483339995,"score_gpt":0.3751540418891554,"score_spread":0.32269037705575543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1883522681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8673383,0.02660636,0.00070597767,0.010199975,0.00019224908,0.000007666926,0.00004760977,0.000013734698,0.09488818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922695,0.005169065,0.00010302158,0.000270939,0.000053649834,0.0000025518589,0.0000061756673,0.000003670642,0.002121369],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962914,0.00022389121,0.0000062589284,0.000024137418,0.000034966473,0.00008159146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997328,0.0000916121,0.000060316983,0.00001812015,0.000023129038,0.00007407429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080208434,0.00019053683,0.00017082391,0.0005730382,0.0021841128,0.0032582406,0.00018913728,0.00043897648,0.0031439564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077436166,0.00013021148,0.00010112145,0.0007353006,0.008900857,0.0018885353,0.0022634713,0.00048530984,0.00019203477],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015328724,0.00009431962,0.12386673,0.00023075343,0.000050547515,0.0024390623,0.41298673,0.00045074898,0.0014899215,0.3121378,0.0054632095,0.14063694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016055632,0.00022559326,0.23963684,0.0004946032,0.000036019628,0.0020983932,0.4550973,0.00026547053,0.0005848099,0.086490996,0.21499348,0.00006048673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003907046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010465308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003907046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085871166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070471514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010517597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1885669740","doi":"10.25336/p68d0m","title":"Family Models for Earning andCaring: Implications for Child Care and for Family Policy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Preference; Toddler; Work (physics); Diversity (politics); Paid work; Child care; Psychology; Demographic economics; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Labour economics; Economics; Sociology; Medicine; Nursing; Working hours","score_opus":0.08930677168978307,"score_gpt":0.37592281546187767,"score_spread":0.2866160437720946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1885669740","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1035846,0.058120087,0.0056474004,0.47944644,0.00072472164,0.00011170086,0.0007610664,0.00009661945,0.35150746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95489377,0.019974535,0.002477773,0.004239055,0.00016332416,0.00005662172,0.00012910103,0.00003167225,0.018034091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973131,0.0009923609,0.00003222995,0.00012552079,0.00036858217,0.0011682168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99585575,0.0010667685,0.00022949095,0.00013939508,0.0010775423,0.001631055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003920877,0.00056382903,0.0006783395,0.002227601,0.014792933,0.009313338,0.0026573099,0.0023133184,0.014488022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007211867,0.00023205031,0.00064038043,0.004091832,0.018434929,0.0056959065,0.0034104686,0.0021417874,0.00034426406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003275596,0.000028121092,0.0071222438,0.00009774256,0.000015785201,0.00029939014,0.014726463,0.0010914896,0.000034596364,0.93903595,0.02015421,0.017361173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040338142,0.00004223218,0.03836934,0.0020893672,0.000059710703,0.00038113864,0.22555259,0.0029992417,0.00009922798,0.46938866,0.26085225,0.00012596854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.955683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97002673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.955683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10715435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1045923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77746284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1889526931","doi":"","title":"Fertility Transition and Female Rational Choices in Egypt","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World health & population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Wife; Economics; Probit model; Developing country; Demographic transition; Demographic economics; Demography; Population; Economic growth; Sociology; Political science; Econometrics","score_opus":0.03757542105535243,"score_gpt":0.3445023979239029,"score_spread":0.30692697686855047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1889526931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985983,0.00008760268,0.000040383886,0.0002536916,7.74439e-7,0.0000025981446,0.000058485555,9.3818454e-7,0.0009570761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950814,0.000065808956,0.00001999916,0.000015455154,0.0000010334302,0.0000015551559,0.000030087615,3.1171297e-7,0.00035754862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997532,0.00008706663,0.000008193585,0.000018504932,0.000021861897,0.00011125844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992663,0.00025946193,0.00028640885,0.000027965294,0.000041801817,0.00011811571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000808233,0.00007033759,0.00014550751,0.00050095003,0.0005951957,0.00082061335,0.00017941878,0.00029983753,0.0031086523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019821066,0.000119434015,0.00016807755,0.0006984117,0.00058639975,0.0004489616,0.00052892667,0.00053338846,0.00014366959],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043252608,0.00024464846,0.9609259,0.000021961965,0.000035700454,0.00058602344,0.007019728,0.0019899253,0.00023598215,0.012183163,0.0008089603,0.0155155305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004484058,0.00011709023,0.97039944,0.000026459124,0.00001397674,0.0002203091,0.017319145,0.0047729798,0.00017388073,0.003457695,0.0034365242,0.000017690225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05621236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0478302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05621236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018811077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082001527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11177033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893874227","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01669.x","title":"Viewpoint: Empirical evidence and tax policy design: lessons from the <i>Mirrlees Review</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Public economics; Economics; Tax reform; Earnings; Tax credit; Empirical evidence; Key (lock); Value-added tax; Macroeconomics; Accounting; Computer science","score_opus":0.41172314982671115,"score_gpt":0.28186992587241755,"score_spread":0.1298532239542936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893874227","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017045978,0.53031576,0.021438805,0.42799073,0.008971068,0.00006983964,0.00021209652,0.000054633314,0.0092424415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16612957,0.592364,0.05064249,0.15943027,0.026381839,0.00044605302,0.00029328797,0.0001565111,0.004155866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9499975,0.035760242,0.00391875,0.0025294165,0.0072127837,0.0005813381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78074205,0.1826166,0.0068749203,0.008800061,0.019917682,0.0010486571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09018816,0.00096032536,0.0038573619,0.006445995,0.0011997987,0.0077768224,0.0033339048,0.0059479866,0.004032796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18312135,0.0008035015,0.0017162143,0.0039860695,0.012977172,0.013382565,0.0031383634,0.009618469,0.0012812617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001322566,0.000040964114,0.0007480873,0.009414305,0.00041548672,0.00012244318,0.0004937504,0.0018981425,0.00019807016,0.82751775,0.04955621,0.10946256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112323396,0.0000780025,0.0011870471,0.02260095,0.00031960322,0.00011680107,0.00069590565,0.001549762,0.0004088649,0.79991245,0.17296787,0.00005041578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043696263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048277806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09018816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008265123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012116785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47696626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1898642510","doi":"10.1111/caje.12121","title":"Social network structure and status competition","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation","keywords":"Centrality; Competition (biology); Microeconomics; Index (typography); Economics; Consumption (sociology); Externality; Measure (data warehouse); Social network (sociolinguistics); Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Ecology; Data mining","score_opus":0.09998836518137097,"score_gpt":0.21270559740057093,"score_spread":0.11271723221919996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1898642510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8296418,0.001120106,0.052712105,0.0051136143,0.000059787628,0.000081758975,0.0004598787,0.00005616142,0.11075476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968252,0.00014685982,0.0007095361,0.00003581575,0.000020234527,0.000010986423,0.000026316531,0.0000031060467,0.0022220286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937844,0.00031232226,0.000015986194,0.00010425679,0.000096303585,0.0000927686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99627435,0.0016247483,0.0010816212,0.0001942581,0.0002700409,0.00055495155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092054904,0.00021380863,0.0003354302,0.00117756,0.0010936403,0.0017832469,0.0005180274,0.00075999356,0.012173312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004742928,0.00014368574,0.00020532265,0.0011915183,0.0022841732,0.0026142697,0.0013334621,0.0004988016,0.00045714463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007040602,0.000095112824,0.019058838,0.00007227071,0.000038688555,0.00016153706,0.00076119765,0.01601773,0.0009002169,0.943374,0.0026422688,0.016807757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049715276,0.000116557305,0.021154672,0.000083279185,0.000037492828,0.00025573093,0.0015344113,0.07424517,0.000283084,0.8871266,0.015078359,0.00003495206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003308549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00323429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012173312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018627439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052464387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0407238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1899996688","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.01499.x","title":"Why is the rate of single‐parenthood lower in Canada than in the U.S.? A dynamic equilibrium analysis of welfare policies","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Welfare; Single mothers; Economics; Human capital; Investment (military); Overlapping generations model; Fertility; Single parent; Labour economics; General equilibrium theory; Demographic economics; Welfare system; Microeconomics; Population; Economic growth; Psychology; Demography; Political science; Sociology; Market economy","score_opus":0.05820791332656533,"score_gpt":0.20717865653264783,"score_spread":0.1489707432060825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1899996688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.880543,0.0022562523,0.0051297215,0.024156045,0.00012110352,0.00007330429,0.0047324835,0.0001403968,0.08284768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99280316,0.00079005375,0.00087427715,0.00040024615,0.000007427129,0.000012184061,0.00036568943,0.00001339189,0.004733531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989998,0.0001070385,0.000013302779,0.00011374787,0.00015358534,0.0006124448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887913,0.0001460392,0.00013053855,0.00004643225,0.00055609114,0.0002417551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010573952,0.00019807386,0.0006547104,0.0013243625,0.0034034308,0.0025904928,0.0011695141,0.00068743044,0.0059155873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036552348,0.00016142493,0.00062986277,0.0020526992,0.001046844,0.0006415579,0.00057595945,0.000782903,0.00023889198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045647926,0.00016197946,0.26157463,0.00016580378,0.00030342967,0.0006176164,0.0032958805,0.1217504,0.0023955707,0.45118013,0.051228806,0.10686923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002256608,0.00017685462,0.57303727,0.00039708934,0.0002780481,0.0004682056,0.015225427,0.22668162,0.0036513442,0.0709908,0.108619735,0.00024789377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9922478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051569816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051569816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041489895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37416697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1901489110","doi":"10.1111/labr.12057","title":"The Motherhood Wage Penalty and Its Determinants: A Public–Private Comparison","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Public sector; Private sector; Labour economics; Economics; Control (management); Economic growth; Management","score_opus":0.05585602638829274,"score_gpt":0.3203539624287174,"score_spread":0.26449793604042465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1901489110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977545,0.00009990349,0.00011217689,0.00026173855,0.000008052748,0.000008626115,0.00025819428,0.0000029860307,0.0014937441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945146,0.000019714982,0.00001375783,0.000012077807,0.0000071064624,0.000004976212,0.00015466331,0.0000012337008,0.00033486699],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983032,0.0005137929,0.00008733433,0.00018666289,0.00032836522,0.00058061647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897042,0.0045029107,0.003366544,0.00067735405,0.00051839644,0.0012306316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021276453,0.00015518157,0.0005467346,0.0012829632,0.00060533994,0.001112709,0.00048288697,0.00067380123,0.01021776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009348411,0.00016350632,0.0005980346,0.0011971866,0.000743649,0.0009238238,0.001690932,0.0010286097,0.00057919614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021315215,0.0012546268,0.97686464,0.000038487,0.00025232823,0.00019127975,0.00082172063,0.0008563338,0.00029770657,0.00339877,0.0010635381,0.01282919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006914863,0.00045064298,0.9921062,0.000017721613,0.00006701437,0.00010733118,0.0035625228,0.0015689017,0.00012794926,0.0008508521,0.0010611307,0.000010742472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006735818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006015784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01021776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006475683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051711744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034181774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1908420438","doi":"10.3917/rfas.021.0043","title":"Les disparités de l'aide sociale entre États aux États-Unis","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue française des affaires sociales","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation; Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08298592981348121,"score_gpt":0.29468852371324306,"score_spread":0.21170259389976184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1908420438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96544415,0.00088172086,0.00032993613,0.0040932936,0.00003119847,0.000012027978,0.00014924168,0.000012151066,0.029046277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940778,0.00023264968,0.00008369073,0.00020739686,0.000012428642,0.000019445013,0.000023933248,0.0000027187546,0.005339972],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993818,0.002887736,0.000285726,0.0004223524,0.0010208455,0.0015652665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877511,0.0048365495,0.003228588,0.0008073695,0.0021080612,0.0012682833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049622664,0.00013872697,0.0003217505,0.0021623815,0.00523834,0.0037706352,0.00047774473,0.00091238774,0.00825305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015876034,0.00019381063,0.00021958753,0.002819195,0.0033706983,0.0017236426,0.003853068,0.0011862298,0.0005234862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056667125,0.00015183279,0.53313386,0.00020757834,0.00014911464,0.000471933,0.26580882,0.00079831836,0.0020702686,0.07435832,0.0091183,0.11316502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021659956,0.00016740462,0.7252124,0.00036283548,0.000059822738,0.000263326,0.15581737,0.00041486893,0.00090660225,0.0038454037,0.11285732,0.00007104641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.079512134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10366071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079512134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072861593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023287935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15809864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916555074","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1024","title":"Child Welfare Reform: Protecting Children or Policing the Poor","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare reform; Welfare; Criminology; Political science; Business; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.019937664605730133,"score_gpt":0.30695125472935064,"score_spread":0.2870135901236205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1916555074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41168782,0.016882896,0.002981831,0.22904088,0.00066982006,0.0002005742,0.0002961472,0.000045477726,0.3381945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602383,0.007577449,0.00049970346,0.008735618,0.0002395211,0.00009162341,0.000042801643,0.000011955639,0.022563133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952987,0.0020948488,0.000072121635,0.00016075463,0.00039194227,0.0019817522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970835,0.0010598244,0.0008865346,0.0001652148,0.00032068373,0.00048416352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025178683,0.0002173713,0.00030477362,0.0011009297,0.0043634363,0.0033763894,0.0005708408,0.0017467487,0.0062641026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009264503,0.00011804723,0.00026469197,0.0015505857,0.0071557146,0.0028536075,0.004145919,0.0018474698,0.00036720058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012305165,0.00014898086,0.036783285,0.00047273107,0.000034305256,0.0007120831,0.061765585,0.0016499478,0.00028795394,0.78063494,0.026146945,0.09124022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010916729,0.0002949862,0.102875076,0.003733569,0.00006993112,0.00045292664,0.15606047,0.0012370044,0.00086072553,0.100770645,0.63347834,0.000057137335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0636241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075838864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0636241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009391211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015181461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12650752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1923522862","doi":"10.1111/1475-5890.12085","title":"Childcare Assistance: Are Subsidies or Tax Credits Better?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fiscal Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"Australian Government; Department of Human Services, State Government of Victoria","keywords":"Subsidy; Economics; Tax credit; Labour economics; Welfare; Proxy (statistics); Constraint (computer-aided design); Government (linguistics); Public economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.0910325769768826,"score_gpt":0.3359740410751076,"score_spread":0.24494146409822498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1923522862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.902218,0.011688367,0.001392648,0.032686446,0.00036792233,0.00023662749,0.0018108104,0.00004706593,0.0495521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99631554,0.0009871846,0.00023808499,0.0007509904,0.000088369554,0.000022361677,0.00021057908,0.000008056423,0.0013788149],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944349,0.0032303694,0.00022884313,0.0003054172,0.0009893357,0.0008111817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726238,0.015902065,0.0067184805,0.0008451816,0.002097013,0.0018134569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01053238,0.0003294902,0.0013829647,0.001089456,0.0005802775,0.0030316345,0.0008755035,0.0017626776,0.018825777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04106066,0.00012418402,0.00091761595,0.0018583703,0.00185447,0.0029151402,0.001108254,0.0015662346,0.00056168454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021025231,0.0063983425,0.36327702,0.0027737846,0.0021688212,0.00047842765,0.0012624925,0.034023248,0.001446046,0.14548297,0.030706437,0.39095715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005754268,0.009951547,0.7167507,0.0036986258,0.0038159476,0.00036855083,0.012307784,0.026729785,0.0033560728,0.082260616,0.13481879,0.00018724188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014999685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013323501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018825777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030326033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042647016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06297845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1925539229","doi":"10.25336/p6f88t","title":"Family Disruption in Canada: Impact of the Changing Patterns of Family Formation and of Female Employment","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Labour economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.048186546787094796,"score_gpt":0.3185865494452751,"score_spread":0.2704000026581803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1925539229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97870606,0.005133234,0.00015006185,0.0056458516,0.00010746828,0.00005912501,0.004793707,0.000026806032,0.005377749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919395,0.002546009,0.00017544146,0.0005632532,0.00002430189,0.000026669131,0.0011376383,0.000020239138,0.003566928],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715555,0.00024954134,0.0001163143,0.00027227492,0.00065315794,0.0015531419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99430436,0.0003254085,0.0007263178,0.00013951879,0.0022527997,0.0022516022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013843686,0.00050468725,0.0007609142,0.003199004,0.013244641,0.003802866,0.0029620684,0.0015483504,0.0059017343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051801405,0.0006408408,0.0011418756,0.009075388,0.002758778,0.0013607511,0.0030248698,0.0021705518,0.00037482384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006327131,0.0001981283,0.93451226,0.00019361841,0.00016227565,0.00070327066,0.019312188,0.00051323563,0.00037348305,0.0025283024,0.009150157,0.03172038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018071805,0.000040804403,0.9763865,0.00009370484,0.0000335652,0.00013777462,0.017076014,0.00024823166,0.00008286017,0.00014808122,0.005689242,0.00004507934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12547521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12547521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15123525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9103907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926365800","doi":"","title":"Socio-Economic Outcomes of Teen Pregnancy and Parenthood: A Review of the Literature.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Disadvantaged; Disadvantage; Psychology; Pregnancy; Developmental psychology; Teen pregnancy; Population; Demography; Sociology; Political science; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.06898514863636453,"score_gpt":0.3643983408875789,"score_spread":0.2954131922512144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1926365800","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002766227,0.99911433,0.000015113915,0.00021857316,0.00007355632,0.0000033323786,0.000017671306,9.0949464e-7,0.0002798752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015544095,0.9981831,0.000033362252,0.00006965549,0.00005897209,0.0000046965047,0.000017561584,3.2090713e-7,0.00007797259],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943024,0.00015223975,0.00009407401,0.000056797307,0.00022819306,0.000038462436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985092,0.0008687023,0.00023167307,0.00001820299,0.0003005564,0.00007161383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013190259,0.00081971136,0.001862938,0.0043531363,0.00042074223,0.0014378306,0.0007525961,0.0010234583,0.0030354057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033579348,0.00030084458,0.00061737746,0.006446364,0.0005935169,0.0011944456,0.00077153475,0.0006080921,0.00064162735],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007409367,0.00008454075,0.0068142773,0.033981044,0.00033642244,0.00043222576,0.00043394495,0.00018566419,0.00010242815,0.0011931047,0.021477692,0.93488455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055282726,0.0004983737,0.117060214,0.14988528,0.0017977842,0.005895095,0.0037028964,0.00025233213,0.000269614,0.003220701,0.7172652,0.00009730702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016168324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03637131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016168324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012778486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036181014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03214842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1927651636","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2014004","title":"The Income Management Strategies of Older Couples in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Allocative efficiency; Demographic economics; Educational attainment; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.010406350939924428,"score_gpt":0.23338169791166485,"score_spread":0.22297534697174043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1927651636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953185,0.00055378285,0.000024167603,0.0010728688,0.0000186183,0.000013800194,0.00008426165,0.0000015282,0.0029124506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964257,0.00061567547,0.00005806032,0.00026050527,0.0000061828323,0.00000675162,0.000055900215,0.0000020617135,0.0025692526],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992105,0.00010536818,0.00002709092,0.000039641094,0.00014000706,0.00047751376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998458,0.00011042481,0.00018379168,0.00001783851,0.00043947567,0.0007905087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007451156,0.00019461485,0.0003407055,0.0008579616,0.010808747,0.0019781762,0.00093379186,0.00062500045,0.0033341632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025339324,0.00018414733,0.0002813825,0.0017572279,0.0013591296,0.0005648911,0.0017052256,0.001008602,0.00017473733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037832302,0.00028316662,0.69748205,0.00010671498,0.00004475269,0.0011844179,0.20744494,0.00030161923,0.00065808144,0.003940769,0.0067606294,0.08141452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020650285,0.00011320685,0.59318674,0.0001734039,0.00003096807,0.00026133712,0.3838831,0.0004192964,0.00013913742,0.00045141784,0.02128017,0.00004050176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98279047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03249824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03249824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03722443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23579234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934533906","doi":"10.25336/p6z614","title":"Demographic Relationships at the Macro Level","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Macro; Census; Macro level; Regression analysis; Econometrics; Regression; Population; Fertility; Focus (optics); Statistics; Geography; Demography; Mathematics; Sociology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.17304616852128682,"score_gpt":0.33136350021901856,"score_spread":0.15831733169773174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1934533906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5109739,0.01059681,0.07239817,0.006784607,0.00028059277,0.00019955431,0.023288963,0.000339014,0.37513852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617875,0.0041408353,0.011454919,0.0005907897,0.00020044719,0.00012242276,0.0028771516,0.000054098007,0.018771896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995561,0.00012596758,0.00002616839,0.00010645018,0.00011405145,0.00007123713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984641,0.00057017914,0.0004095154,0.00013706207,0.00026430647,0.00015473363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060636667,0.00014739143,0.00021939247,0.0021057725,0.0006539371,0.001682534,0.00023264955,0.0002558949,0.0187302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004062809,0.00012557402,0.0002018084,0.00361421,0.0006052289,0.0019360128,0.0014018461,0.0009056446,0.0025674393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030632833,0.000091434355,0.55718625,0.00020606798,0.00010515161,0.0003722935,0.0025418946,0.0036040093,0.0014151079,0.29587063,0.009370059,0.12920657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021952237,0.000092559145,0.7987428,0.00013353187,0.00004848876,0.00063536846,0.003458391,0.0039141527,0.00055053516,0.07790929,0.11446862,0.000044064043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085421745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015093391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0187302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007454125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006112981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06265873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1944648086","doi":"10.14288/1.0052282","title":"Economic and social status in household decision making : evidence from extended family mobility","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Economics; Affect (linguistics); Utility maximization; Unit (ring theory); Microeconomics; Public economics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.03444421280495734,"score_gpt":0.29322566758182766,"score_spread":0.2587814547768703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1944648086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99713683,0.00026882667,0.00038477613,0.00020062481,0.0000028132542,0.0000042016786,0.000057041252,0.0000014155715,0.0019433313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994375,0.00016529055,0.00010985563,0.000017732065,0.0000037328277,0.000004342248,0.000038460406,8.6533026e-7,0.00022224592],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989237,0.0006903308,0.00003834372,0.00013265289,0.00008861043,0.00012627793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824966,0.0119269425,0.003077287,0.001436243,0.000390558,0.0006723842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041072173,0.00021437551,0.00034224155,0.00065735256,0.0006149172,0.00079473644,0.0005486204,0.0005411126,0.006389541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014490608,0.00022999103,0.00035865285,0.00095971255,0.0015410401,0.0010247256,0.0011427036,0.00045138315,0.00033736744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091381045,0.0005932749,0.934735,0.00009199236,0.0003449791,0.00065947906,0.009555058,0.0051063173,0.00032366865,0.013100707,0.00050182897,0.03407395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010923824,0.00049241644,0.9545447,0.00011116577,0.00013990929,0.0004981244,0.0065633142,0.011938671,0.00021752772,0.022168264,0.0031773518,0.000039227623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076090232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076090232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004333065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030365642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021721303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945328068","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5876.2011.00536.x","title":"INTER-TEMPORAL LABOUR FORCE PARTICIPATION AMONG MARRIED WOMEN IN JAPAN*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Economics; Probit model; Ordered probit; Probit; Econometrics; Variety (cybernetics); Demographic economics; Instrumental variable; Order (exchange); Variable (mathematics); Term (time); Labour economics; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.043260919191388705,"score_gpt":0.29921017143341416,"score_spread":0.25594925224202547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1945328068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58787435,0.40724513,0.0000882502,0.0014771872,0.00021692879,0.000012614553,0.0007995444,0.000002195765,0.0022838148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78450364,0.21323913,0.000110810965,0.0003463406,0.0002129859,0.000030769097,0.0007501654,0.0000030225046,0.0008031608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958926,0.00009027125,0.000089210196,0.000066076864,0.00005745672,0.000107733315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932396,0.00016307842,0.00025022667,0.000021221951,0.00011988295,0.00012177408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011274065,0.00031733932,0.00059690885,0.002412197,0.0006104213,0.00083088345,0.0004173281,0.00051849073,0.0010693647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014965051,0.00024033333,0.0006730594,0.004962426,0.0004589422,0.0006962642,0.0007866773,0.00035354728,0.00007694832],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007164836,0.00012488983,0.8597276,0.0054738126,0.0009956633,0.000946602,0.007643727,0.0002429877,0.0006475101,0.00065303117,0.0023966192,0.12043115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067446813,0.000056173285,0.9915862,0.00039513138,0.0002799978,0.00014871507,0.0033529315,0.000037315698,0.00002731674,0.000049618913,0.004052301,0.0000074638097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07107202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17660931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07107202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010662326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023041647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14131665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945816828","doi":"","title":"Le congé parental et son impact sur la santé des mères québécoises","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archipelago (Université du Québec à Montréal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.007883669966108219,"score_gpt":0.21786118526732687,"score_spread":0.20997751530121864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1945816828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9581406,0.00796041,0.00086764374,0.0063877827,0.00010273877,0.000100662306,0.0057331263,0.00002722439,0.020680021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871954,0.0028799325,0.0005534527,0.0005228611,0.000018204673,0.00006840606,0.0008628693,0.000007763935,0.0078911055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987531,0.0005014665,0.000038387658,0.00015292705,0.00023642338,0.0003177234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99492407,0.0014238944,0.00090939156,0.0002153896,0.001683075,0.0008441144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017979925,0.0003143966,0.00048075643,0.0009994317,0.0023465795,0.0019075404,0.000648258,0.00050757633,0.008813679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073413355,0.0002131197,0.00052557234,0.0020161653,0.0010055868,0.00082495797,0.0011269056,0.0010569914,0.00034193188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036551422,0.00011360777,0.8914006,0.00075000833,0.0005975565,0.0006107226,0.020545471,0.0019364498,0.00058296206,0.0064698085,0.0079123005,0.06871508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000136580575,0.0000981803,0.968708,0.0007991356,0.00027157617,0.00006852926,0.01124075,0.00052154035,0.00013831309,0.00031304167,0.017802134,0.000025178886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9720079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.985666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02799213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019150835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022026902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13894969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1955195427","doi":"10.1111/coep.12094","title":"“COERCIVE COOPERATION”? ONTARIO'S PAY EQUITY ACT OF 1988 AND THE GENDER PAY GAP","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pay Equity; Gender pay gap; Equity (law); Economics; Wage; Public economics; Labour economics; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05995661317583345,"score_gpt":0.31315541788038204,"score_spread":0.2531988047045486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1955195427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8602679,0.0010131183,0.0007935878,0.035657056,0.00009854048,0.00007200903,0.0012128416,0.000019988654,0.1008649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99293596,0.000158272,0.00012587114,0.00070395856,0.000013906839,0.000016418076,0.000081744154,0.000002484766,0.0059614656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980386,0.0003932694,0.00005358483,0.000115860414,0.00061111816,0.00078758935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656063,0.0010127082,0.0009018749,0.00016290347,0.0007567978,0.00060504803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019972364,0.00008783297,0.00021658039,0.00036785615,0.00276194,0.0016596698,0.00059188966,0.00087808265,0.0042524883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006548819,0.00011390212,0.00018566356,0.0008695832,0.0033264237,0.00062404753,0.00092780084,0.00070029055,0.00012766894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056940183,0.00013163495,0.42763832,0.00022806818,0.00011172619,0.0005474197,0.027361952,0.0035276173,0.0016236939,0.43043658,0.060493737,0.047329824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013209604,0.00010191492,0.8196949,0.00021686517,0.00007374921,0.000084928055,0.027447592,0.002381495,0.00082913873,0.0145271225,0.13446043,0.000049676804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9478103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9709926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052189708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03504299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040370908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25425583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1960837915","doi":"10.1177/1536504215585784","title":"Stay-at-Home Fatherhoods","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contexts","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Education and Early Childhood Development","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.043819285964869684,"score_gpt":0.30799730337183256,"score_spread":0.2641780174069629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1960837915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9603531,0.0019537082,0.00032347217,0.005557898,0.00011558069,0.0000055319806,0.000040525767,0.0000031206812,0.0316471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938414,0.00059285975,0.00010843972,0.00021179917,0.0000081363305,0.0000033271813,0.000010687754,0.000002914275,0.005220383],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992925,0.00039809648,0.000014065822,0.000049817856,0.00007164111,0.00017385934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901307,0.0002381107,0.0001910972,0.000031748907,0.00008840354,0.00043754684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013401934,0.00011581185,0.00016800158,0.00022906905,0.0025405055,0.0011555622,0.00020578929,0.00032364964,0.005987966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018556912,0.00012258641,0.00010485988,0.00024196209,0.0012270538,0.0010300316,0.0018574692,0.000851164,0.00030276665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004854253,0.00031651033,0.3427798,0.00019956384,0.000067832836,0.004189979,0.36214456,0.00016132822,0.003025366,0.13191204,0.01799157,0.13672596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023236866,0.00015543654,0.29176223,0.00037804936,0.000029835473,0.0014463546,0.58280706,0.00013384588,0.00062860077,0.0078136185,0.11479317,0.00002857322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022377262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013736538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005987966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050029677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007045936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02003175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1961368802","doi":"10.1017/s0022050716000966","title":"Patronage Politics and the Development of the Welfare State: Confederate Pensions in the American South","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic History","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Oxford; University of Cambridge; Harvard University; Princeton University","keywords":"Ballot; Pension; Cash; Politics; Democracy; State (computer science); Political science; Welfare; Welfare state; Threatened species; Public administration; Economics; Law; Finance; Voting","score_opus":0.023324038017207276,"score_gpt":0.24129133466584926,"score_spread":0.21796729664864198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1961368802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752945,0.00033117985,0.00007358545,0.0029324924,0.000010049218,0.0000028369784,0.00001402418,0.0000017134895,0.021339675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982875,0.00011319243,0.000017588482,0.00009251333,0.000004403125,0.000001550476,0.0000040760447,0.000001124587,0.0014779854],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994604,0.00019212808,0.000009132631,0.00004192573,0.000039729777,0.00025666194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995425,0.000091071524,0.00011393944,0.000018175815,0.00003854218,0.00019589938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010710112,0.00007071017,0.0001365812,0.0009986731,0.004802388,0.0018627323,0.00025644444,0.00046414995,0.0039925515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013710213,0.00011639741,0.00009024166,0.0008614151,0.005056948,0.0011832325,0.002603324,0.0010033031,0.00018480535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022385998,0.00013414849,0.28082,0.00005167103,0.000015805974,0.0009958247,0.3609505,0.00022834905,0.0021976384,0.30615157,0.003801546,0.04442903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024837345,0.000080174555,0.57776445,0.00018754748,0.000016199467,0.0003790739,0.31795216,0.00037274486,0.00075765164,0.021607958,0.08082738,0.000029835814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03745139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12442735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03745139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034147482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020251106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074466765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965414749","doi":"10.1080/00220388.2014.947279","title":"Does Female Reservation Affect Long-Term Political Outcomes? Evidence from Rural India","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Development Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre; World Bank Group","keywords":"Reservation; Beijing; China; Human capital; Politics; Economic growth; Agriculture; Political science; State (computer science); Economics; Rural development; Development economics; Geography","score_opus":0.07185186952505841,"score_gpt":0.36393442170233004,"score_spread":0.29208255217727164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965414749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99327636,0.00058662397,0.000062119885,0.0007528559,0.000015250987,0.0000067709293,0.000506993,0.0000031500722,0.0047898972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984524,0.00037431746,0.000028479071,0.00009535369,0.000010490971,0.000005598339,0.00021223992,0.0000016999426,0.0008195381],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992354,0.00030007132,0.000038007292,0.0001009482,0.00008129374,0.00024437142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99490684,0.001682526,0.0021722252,0.00034126855,0.00036646394,0.00053065247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009413662,0.00016351647,0.00022049596,0.00052984245,0.000772635,0.0009779694,0.00052456185,0.0002992589,0.0045974017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033979474,0.00015098635,0.00039754875,0.00117318,0.0010124823,0.0004865229,0.0011848474,0.00065773487,0.0005243429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019290051,0.00014398186,0.9796901,0.00011592274,0.000108151566,0.00028004803,0.0050013354,0.00019675992,0.00017668067,0.00092221715,0.0012533036,0.011918574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035708301,0.00007438216,0.99263895,0.000045451427,0.0000371956,0.000040743093,0.0053703194,0.000057637208,0.000074787014,0.000106848405,0.0015434087,0.000006568313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06647681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.100117475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06647681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007546451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008772677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1321798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965824921","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12095","title":"HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTION AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Lesbian; Production (economics); Value (mathematics); Sexual orientation; Labour economics; Census; Household income; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Geography; Sociology; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.04398247597411921,"score_gpt":0.28573877122771096,"score_spread":0.24175629525359177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965824921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51304114,0.0029019818,0.0042831325,0.0013577249,0.00009007363,0.0006294678,0.37829784,0.00019460097,0.099204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89808923,0.0033945332,0.0020847798,0.0000903976,0.000026262907,0.00020808617,0.07020981,0.000022929667,0.025873927],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935716,0.00006882793,0.000027872218,0.00005006379,0.00031532155,0.00018071441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983924,0.0002902326,0.0004172746,0.00011095738,0.0005816935,0.00020745667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004329964,0.00032577047,0.00031588803,0.0023474211,0.00083726074,0.0013524541,0.0005323539,0.0002131776,0.011939293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00368202,0.00015398601,0.0004413608,0.0073110824,0.00054578594,0.00040557652,0.00056204764,0.00047665217,0.0010864954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094253664,0.00004585949,0.89844227,0.00020363006,0.0001898863,0.0003007489,0.0010524363,0.010767439,0.00018076721,0.01668468,0.027564894,0.04447311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010036034,0.000019723027,0.93635625,0.00010078961,0.000032934393,0.00015927466,0.0018632144,0.004715529,0.00020456774,0.0016110836,0.054901887,0.000024694209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92577136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9268245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92577136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011513619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007525318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14933151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966810452","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-4085.2006.00341.x","title":"Collective consumption and welfare","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Welfare; Economics; Pareto principle; Microeconomics; Set (abstract data type); Distribution (mathematics); Pareto efficiency; Mathematical economics; Welfare economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Sociology; Operations management; Market economy","score_opus":0.08152448639609139,"score_gpt":0.2000143818735436,"score_spread":0.1184898954774522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966810452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34078586,0.0037040964,0.10388601,0.02492281,0.00026282325,0.00009889947,0.0006183617,0.000112076756,0.525609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813975,0.00081268454,0.0019987775,0.00029346204,0.00005403214,0.00004788179,0.0000706401,0.000013620955,0.0153113045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937326,0.0002524914,0.000017514263,0.0001126228,0.00013131488,0.00011290498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990102,0.0003699788,0.00019155756,0.00018897372,0.00013570231,0.00010370026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001175247,0.0003474985,0.0003641958,0.00051125645,0.00084229273,0.0025866393,0.00039640832,0.0013970023,0.01139971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021534017,0.0001523321,0.0004203572,0.0008364023,0.0026559683,0.0018306491,0.0016688029,0.0009790784,0.0006770617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018071698,0.00003475152,0.0025171675,0.00005180253,0.000045460973,0.0000707493,0.00045437724,0.007853403,0.00024892975,0.9713329,0.0029319949,0.014440314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010947094,0.00002483556,0.003000278,0.00007599312,0.0000145271415,0.00007853373,0.00060719514,0.0062876684,0.00012245505,0.9695747,0.020195013,0.000007925388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014803255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010401332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01139971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019735845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007812306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038135827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967320957","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2009.01211.x","title":"A Welfare Trap? The Duration and Dynamics of Social Assistance Use among Lone Mothers in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Social assistance; Art; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.02821007705001419,"score_gpt":0.24649802223071235,"score_spread":0.21828794518069816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967320957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955478,0.000582143,0.00007510101,0.0009806642,0.000009511706,0.000015845293,0.000917581,0.0000068786,0.0018645844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99650854,0.00052018545,0.00008038217,0.00011171108,0.000004125196,0.000013717713,0.00032774085,0.000005123691,0.0024283212],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905044,0.00007141116,0.000025470592,0.00013080744,0.000174799,0.00054699206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776566,0.00021546493,0.0005130707,0.00006429795,0.0006485606,0.0007929101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067667395,0.00020476153,0.00047611835,0.0015793692,0.0048318007,0.0024071203,0.0013946554,0.0007697645,0.00373569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002846268,0.00032090378,0.00031817058,0.002751619,0.0015021984,0.0008367052,0.0017901721,0.0010039791,0.00025061695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019460314,0.00006478045,0.94613993,0.000061949555,0.0000414204,0.0002595905,0.028853377,0.00019391804,0.0005557935,0.0013829506,0.0024010616,0.019850727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049176465,0.00002710552,0.95346326,0.00007947496,0.000017202243,0.00004918578,0.04059529,0.00030585894,0.00009180512,0.00009358189,0.005249093,0.00002318281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9942654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04558965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04558965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04449549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3307776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968120670","doi":"10.3138/cpp.v33.1.093","title":"You've Come a Long Way, Baby? Persistent Gender Inequality in University Enrolment and Completion in Canada, 1979–2004","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Divergence (linguistics); Demography; Index (typography); Demographic economics; Convergence (economics); Gender inequality; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Economic growth; Mathematics","score_opus":0.040488756309366575,"score_gpt":0.257596261060265,"score_spread":0.21710750475089843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968120670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98185915,0.0014513253,0.00006975422,0.0016883244,0.000021277529,0.000016866876,0.0114017455,0.000016219572,0.0034751892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922201,0.000763341,0.000090853275,0.00011791075,0.000012603814,0.000008894206,0.004466642,0.000005316106,0.0023142335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998923,0.000053031898,0.000044991066,0.00010837395,0.0003062186,0.0005642625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99584985,0.00020522464,0.00068563985,0.000107187385,0.0020004988,0.0011515337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009268483,0.000237025,0.0005046338,0.0030370005,0.0026933276,0.001556596,0.0012832915,0.00049351726,0.0020068018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028290732,0.00020884983,0.0004899454,0.006905146,0.0010693368,0.0005681195,0.0011220451,0.00080174126,0.00031256306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011646155,0.00004137421,0.9742596,0.000050674083,0.0000509517,0.00010067984,0.003132733,0.00043783095,0.00018150944,0.00080584944,0.005648091,0.015174307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002022283,0.0000071027785,0.9963721,0.000019237825,0.000006863109,0.00001500501,0.0011054188,0.00016408684,0.000049923678,0.000022716995,0.0022273127,0.000008197054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99743134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99879813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038806163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038806163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04758824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2815597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969357345","doi":"10.5430/afr.v3n2p1","title":"Tax Incentive Proposals to Enhance Child Support Payment Compliance and Tax Progressivity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting and Finance Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Incentive; Public economics; Tax incentive; Child support; Public support; Tax credit; Business; Compliance (psychology); Economics; State income tax; Tax reform; Microeconomics; Finance; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.039974609964840306,"score_gpt":0.38476756478625107,"score_spread":0.34479295482141076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969357345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9211308,0.00022518075,0.0066131423,0.0051229615,0.00008872935,0.00045132925,0.00020184799,0.00008654847,0.06607954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995786,0.000082446146,0.0018876018,0.00029196852,0.00003064045,0.000078741214,0.000046026118,0.0000047117305,0.0017918659],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99235886,0.004151233,0.0003881797,0.00030896274,0.0015728746,0.0012199163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9644161,0.017011585,0.011624449,0.0021337918,0.0029091777,0.0019048955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01345361,0.0002833623,0.0002400807,0.0013375634,0.001523016,0.0026946508,0.0009065838,0.0014354092,0.0077397446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051532164,0.00024214026,0.00046254054,0.0011688191,0.0017662696,0.0019716967,0.0019142412,0.0019696464,0.00038961612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007624219,0.005253734,0.43536618,0.00023088118,0.00019382054,0.0005181515,0.003832693,0.015004139,0.0037845722,0.38064897,0.009319539,0.14508486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005457756,0.0028694987,0.79486763,0.000603332,0.0003120539,0.0006183728,0.009190416,0.033133492,0.007062703,0.08377779,0.06682245,0.00019645953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035649287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062984284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01345361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027874068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006018887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07115036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969743003","doi":"10.1111/0019-8676.00173","title":"Public‐ and Private‐Sector Wage Differentials in Canada Revisited","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public sector; Economic rent; Wage; Private sector; Labour economics; Payment; Business; Government (linguistics); Variety (cybernetics); Economics; Finance; Economic growth; Market economy; Economy","score_opus":0.053654112454138966,"score_gpt":0.24690749863027747,"score_spread":0.19325338617613852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969743003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796122,0.0011503962,0.00020610857,0.0020511395,0.000028676795,0.00001607561,0.003127186,0.000021898033,0.013786204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951934,0.00027472584,0.00011760759,0.00011214673,0.0000061953656,0.00000410499,0.00076339376,0.0000053517724,0.0035230261],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872214,0.000053070566,0.000031970303,0.00011543545,0.0004740695,0.00060325774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758756,0.0002579756,0.0003221302,0.00008216893,0.0010981382,0.00065204274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010016738,0.0001806255,0.00041532647,0.0019377853,0.0025390428,0.0012922586,0.0007691951,0.0003476844,0.0049580345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003438558,0.0001558979,0.00041535933,0.0049180607,0.0008627249,0.00043463756,0.00073657976,0.0007955999,0.00019894377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025048412,0.00006246732,0.92189294,0.000069198584,0.00009410155,0.00021082924,0.004844314,0.0010456366,0.00043657052,0.013731736,0.00940384,0.04795782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000946543,0.0000126892855,0.99079216,0.000027893928,0.000015502512,0.000034190798,0.0029309634,0.0006286015,0.00010884128,0.0002847901,0.0051470236,0.000007812061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99522924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032800358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032800358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032421872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23798442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969822792","doi":"10.1007/s10834-004-1415-1","title":"Cohort Perspectives on Women?s Educational Attainment and the Timing of Parenthood in Ghana","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Educational attainment; Cohort; Demographic economics; Demography; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.020821642039499006,"score_gpt":0.30126304357622985,"score_spread":0.28044140153673086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969822792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961079,0.0006011413,0.00005977116,0.0010757291,0.000023377677,0.0000071014433,0.0002592187,0.0000014770877,0.0018643173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999116,0.0003066352,0.000024076531,0.00004163981,0.000008903942,0.000004511055,0.000055221317,9.1453904e-7,0.0004419587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995509,0.00014552478,0.000023239749,0.000043384127,0.000036513033,0.00020049675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975387,0.00069128815,0.0008782145,0.00009935158,0.00028496934,0.00050751696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021609776,0.00012743639,0.00020285229,0.00093616237,0.0012641817,0.0012067219,0.00031573235,0.00044744273,0.0035782582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047654537,0.0001660038,0.00018102188,0.0015298497,0.000584833,0.00093108177,0.0010123039,0.0007431074,0.00021291821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041932278,0.00006282069,0.95492613,0.000025375126,0.00002167194,0.00044571553,0.032140512,0.000059951817,0.00036364645,0.0025623718,0.0005813409,0.008391157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011221472,0.00011627026,0.9523093,0.000079950245,0.000021436448,0.0001941727,0.042180054,0.00012148016,0.00019616967,0.0006216323,0.004135611,0.000012740016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08469823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12063266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08469823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012796865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014298945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16841048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971272404","doi":"10.1177/109114210203000505","title":"Public Provision of Indivisible Private Goods in Short Supply","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Government (linguistics); Private good; Economics; Public economics; Government expenditure; Labour economics; Business; Public finance; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.07942749459356237,"score_gpt":0.30421043115342516,"score_spread":0.2247829365598628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971272404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18875612,0.03853209,0.1435311,0.028917663,0.00042414918,0.00018893224,0.0011009527,0.0002465723,0.59830236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93171793,0.013534782,0.0069983476,0.00078865513,0.00031946975,0.00010764951,0.00020964889,0.00003256457,0.04629092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984535,0.0006186429,0.00007166873,0.00018630506,0.00038714163,0.0002826897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970613,0.0012433259,0.0007512047,0.000440117,0.00036846907,0.00013561478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001997167,0.0004125037,0.00066867017,0.0015715888,0.0010250468,0.004319195,0.0006864118,0.0019559602,0.012017276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049548387,0.00037420672,0.00049084733,0.001945268,0.0047023115,0.00680808,0.0020193474,0.0011086034,0.0013266299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052887517,0.00003932201,0.0009666528,0.00021152827,0.000019579471,0.00014892002,0.00020115433,0.0041242656,0.0003582624,0.9600396,0.0032204804,0.030617349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034202763,0.0000915322,0.0022570132,0.0002982093,0.000031589636,0.00030838905,0.000586856,0.0045899185,0.0006798144,0.89426726,0.09683339,0.000021803115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004611693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034818538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012017276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00494402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030912799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040201783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972006922","doi":"10.1007/s11150-014-9251-z","title":"Child health and parental paid work","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Psychology; Work (physics); Paid work; National Longitudinal Surveys; Coping (psychology); Work hours; Mental health; Division of labour; Demographic economics; Developmental psychology; Domestic work; Economics; Labour economics; Working hours; Clinical psychology; Psychiatry; Wage","score_opus":0.033662338183721975,"score_gpt":0.26099295215606577,"score_spread":0.2273306139723438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972006922","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002176171,0.9976246,0.00004828481,0.0012423334,0.00024264304,0.0000012457895,0.000011617412,5.7485164e-7,0.0006111435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024229488,0.9961718,0.00005560012,0.00039910985,0.0007184416,0.0000031200013,0.000014587002,7.406512e-7,0.00021369147],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993331,0.00026606314,0.00007146113,0.000097410484,0.00017767069,0.00005436907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99601376,0.0030470998,0.0002731922,0.00007043126,0.00045849342,0.00013697578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019749047,0.0005528374,0.0013175142,0.0033283387,0.00045483635,0.001966696,0.0008867076,0.0016697135,0.003064384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050835717,0.00040843734,0.0005063841,0.0059746723,0.0018152006,0.0016888622,0.0010110129,0.0021609787,0.000429453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014609392,0.00019251891,0.00462093,0.014726174,0.00029135292,0.00020234658,0.00044303003,0.0008442827,0.00018274633,0.04252474,0.05267639,0.8831493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004202421,0.00015681682,0.039195415,0.04337665,0.0003082265,0.0010379357,0.0018522767,0.00043373895,0.00012628688,0.052667975,0.8607257,0.00007699911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0099353865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0141501315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0099353865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018065666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029025231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019755125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972290785","doi":"10.1080/00420980601184745","title":"Do Two-earner Households Base Their Choice of Residential Location on Both Incomes?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Pooling; Economics; Function (biology); Labour economics; Public economics; Demographic economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05785508560811741,"score_gpt":0.3376595847294497,"score_spread":0.27980449912133226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972290785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98873466,0.00020250554,0.002371992,0.0012867796,0.000015751839,0.000013659592,0.00007767907,0.0000070560886,0.007289873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981949,0.000106633786,0.00048234523,0.0001508096,0.000010716039,0.0000056136323,0.00003260261,0.0000017181573,0.0010146279],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942577,0.00020439814,0.000022414184,0.00012101541,0.000067665285,0.00015880272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966197,0.0012977801,0.0012670632,0.00026726685,0.00015404973,0.0003940113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017299602,0.00017789553,0.0007118402,0.00061297923,0.00045168962,0.0015493282,0.00050239085,0.0009883078,0.007534433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009358759,0.00024947646,0.00023007854,0.00072062825,0.0015655921,0.0028445392,0.00093385414,0.00053264695,0.001049792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007669544,0.00065675145,0.78245926,0.00014486985,0.00021867978,0.0011733904,0.013079116,0.0025017948,0.0024137218,0.06250877,0.0023239858,0.13175271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001802421,0.0006837673,0.6452703,0.00012871485,0.00016291343,0.0019674317,0.07847319,0.017004233,0.0013655063,0.23905775,0.015537433,0.00016851292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021194327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029301695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007534433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027491062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018962336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025205255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972459939","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2354.2006.00410.x","title":"WHY ARE FERTILITY RATES AND FEMALE EMPLOYMENT RATIOS POSITIVELY CORRELATED ACROSS O.E.C.D. COUNTRIES?*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; Total fertility rate; Unemployment; Order (exchange); Unemployment rate; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Demography; Family planning; Population; Research methodology; Macroeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.024545873762345287,"score_gpt":0.3220247974954388,"score_spread":0.2974789237330935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972459939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96094984,0.018031929,0.001522871,0.0029002924,0.0000746014,0.000019345156,0.0020929296,0.000022645096,0.01438564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99484915,0.0034666234,0.00035573417,0.00022658652,0.00003569709,0.0000107395135,0.0005653618,0.000003443778,0.00048656596],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946135,0.00017533294,0.000039798684,0.00013624973,0.00006552651,0.0001218022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99562114,0.0013333557,0.0019392341,0.00027436338,0.0006115995,0.0002202718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011986278,0.00012345577,0.00049517286,0.0016938355,0.00025794026,0.0008477794,0.00031975642,0.00034481095,0.001840215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062745716,0.00012818103,0.00032969855,0.0032134387,0.00048130297,0.000344597,0.0003349737,0.00028295166,0.0003444466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007662997,0.000015374097,0.9612746,0.00011000746,0.00019110226,0.00016141101,0.00023068374,0.0009903089,0.00023790634,0.0057938085,0.00155184,0.02936638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008885288,0.00002518085,0.9941552,0.000054652803,0.00004605472,0.00015806546,0.00050380174,0.00033568067,0.00011573463,0.0019846256,0.0026043546,0.000007782829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013399726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011073293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013399726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000428644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036941207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026643455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972559425","doi":"10.1016/j.anihpc.2005.10.001","title":"An inverse problem in the economic theory of demand","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annales de l Institut Henri Poincaré C Analyse Non Linéaire","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Inverse demand function; Economics; Mathematical economics; Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics; Demand curve","score_opus":0.024401972366851682,"score_gpt":0.29613001102472464,"score_spread":0.271728038657873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972559425","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09765054,0.0031135206,0.74097794,0.023298865,0.00039173878,0.00003641345,0.00037208688,0.00009393817,0.13406502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8970973,0.0025626416,0.057763956,0.001498022,0.0008255517,0.00019182308,0.00025437766,0.000115822055,0.03969042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988707,0.00054942904,0.00004014734,0.00021253443,0.00024343177,0.00008384566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841845,0.0011006367,0.000096844335,0.00014983118,0.00017587491,0.00005826255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015894853,0.00045747485,0.00078128534,0.00079777645,0.0008851999,0.0023802945,0.00083362666,0.001757879,0.0071682236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005259143,0.0004320722,0.0010745354,0.0011006744,0.0037651362,0.0057078013,0.0017965877,0.0025989767,0.00057395594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006903851,0.00000794095,0.0002817182,0.000027513617,0.000008634506,0.000036783986,0.00018111392,0.007098167,0.00010567617,0.9874427,0.00081704115,0.0039858706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005217683,0.000006766687,0.00017439571,0.000010991548,0.0000030952422,0.000036674817,0.0001027311,0.024037722,0.000054536664,0.97114366,0.004417512,0.000006627927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00271892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014701728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071682236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019331606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008274572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02398014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973625857","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2003.tb00254.x","title":"Labour Force Activity of Women in Canada: A Comparative Analysis of Aboriginal and Non‐Aboriginal Women*","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Ethnology; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Demography; Art; Population; Census","score_opus":0.030804763578613736,"score_gpt":0.3001319921507185,"score_spread":0.2693272285721048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973625857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958916,0.0010007889,0.000047003246,0.00016660841,0.0000059679733,0.000024769892,0.0013533882,0.000003094213,0.0015068081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955863,0.0014665476,0.00011753805,0.00008173878,0.0000047077447,0.00002358409,0.00095883565,0.0000034846232,0.0017572176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994012,0.000036913258,0.000032180167,0.000059793292,0.00017386052,0.00029608025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993082,0.00006213508,0.00011672703,0.000017395156,0.00029080315,0.00020471643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043362592,0.00030630527,0.00042662045,0.0027129464,0.0028228115,0.0010029403,0.00069014344,0.0004248269,0.0016606443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010469665,0.00029531054,0.00048704585,0.006638506,0.0007752104,0.00029559474,0.00092889316,0.00036511806,0.00019233969],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008984473,0.000022894994,0.9776478,0.00012270332,0.00005028047,0.00019332387,0.012437957,0.00006263995,0.00043561973,0.00015465364,0.00041081442,0.008371451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015743199,0.000022723118,0.99053276,0.000026916852,0.000012962093,0.000035746303,0.008419242,0.000040817522,0.000038416623,0.000009381299,0.00085383427,0.0000056223066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99718803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014568402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014568402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017928086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105701685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973718554","doi":"10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00169-4","title":"The retirement-consumption puzzle: a marital bargaining approach","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Economics; Consumption (sociology); Wife; Demographic economics; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Permanent income hypothesis; Panel data; Marital status; Labour economics; Sample (material); Life-cycle hypothesis; Demography; Econometrics; Population; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.0645038979635905,"score_gpt":0.2791512958189237,"score_spread":0.21464739785533316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973718554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46448764,0.021275854,0.09946748,0.20817181,0.0013509749,0.00014446676,0.0018140717,0.00021772555,0.20307001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589519,0.0041532656,0.0029770185,0.004010389,0.0016105885,0.00008043838,0.00025545427,0.00004067177,0.027920237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992654,0.0003458297,0.00002743274,0.000091970796,0.00011688098,0.00015257215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942537,0.004069207,0.00065095973,0.00040544037,0.00029074348,0.00033001025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047133896,0.00051495363,0.0016234283,0.0012355996,0.0021112985,0.0034060436,0.0030384504,0.006156063,0.032035924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01732107,0.0004201629,0.0011705891,0.0017260564,0.002635493,0.0068290434,0.0020815171,0.004732421,0.0014082761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019538852,0.0001582878,0.003997758,0.00007568962,0.00006513326,0.00029130216,0.0007447027,0.008307089,0.0002156723,0.9547193,0.012263046,0.01896657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012446189,0.000023029197,0.002826784,0.000057940026,0.00003736397,0.0000712856,0.00085574586,0.017537069,0.000051532188,0.97219706,0.0061960085,0.000021699389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035738256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004693832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032035924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014674756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015755713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10717082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973842032","doi":"10.1002/pam.20440","title":"The nonprofit advantage: Producing quality in thick and thin child care markets","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Quality (philosophy); Productivity; Profit (economics); Competitive advantage; Child care; Marketing; Economics; Nursing; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Medicine","score_opus":0.011699298713883909,"score_gpt":0.3323133128908339,"score_spread":0.32061401417694996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973842032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99422175,0.00007788322,0.00048467453,0.00041246373,0.000005418017,0.000020983165,0.00009402898,0.000006196392,0.0046764505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99920815,0.000026071688,0.00013934776,0.000050955663,0.000009401746,0.000008542225,0.000060688544,0.0000022370684,0.00049468223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863344,0.00046840723,0.000049920975,0.00015723988,0.00025303097,0.00043807726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98603266,0.0052421656,0.0058653564,0.0003392648,0.00039388935,0.0021266546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018169406,0.00022999651,0.0003955309,0.0009536394,0.0008807422,0.002648855,0.000516195,0.0006671062,0.016256712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008489974,0.00019647092,0.00054370123,0.0009670361,0.0016548905,0.0018520049,0.0031366663,0.0013056011,0.00032919442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043480124,0.00056323915,0.9728176,0.000050180373,0.000089943445,0.00031084678,0.0007470949,0.001829189,0.0008348566,0.009779647,0.0011603328,0.0113822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010240331,0.00027627996,0.98009515,0.000035224748,0.00008241146,0.00011408433,0.0042544585,0.0067456886,0.000694569,0.00618351,0.0013958276,0.00002026591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012162606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01736091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016256712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015586162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013494124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054384172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974132012","doi":"10.1080/13504851.2012.667545","title":"Home production and the welfare cost of labour supply tax distortions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics Letters","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Labour supply; Welfare; Production (economics); Labour economics; Production theory; Microeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.01013474282666924,"score_gpt":0.2126902031545687,"score_spread":0.20255546032789948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974132012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87920284,0.0010030378,0.055212647,0.0029661988,0.00007483053,0.00006163551,0.0007317266,0.00011284514,0.060634233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99692327,0.0002879094,0.0012006252,0.000040689738,0.000008390559,0.000011626918,0.00005526759,0.0000108541735,0.0014612924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940014,0.00027047307,0.000019099565,0.00006264054,0.00010746524,0.00014017995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750286,0.0013599417,0.00042029808,0.0005152129,0.00012588252,0.00007576286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010582332,0.00028603588,0.00042997446,0.00041244391,0.0005523399,0.0017356573,0.0005458112,0.0007143847,0.0061239274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008616957,0.00030162433,0.00058114843,0.00082314375,0.0019044253,0.0020678332,0.0014355349,0.0009408246,0.00019076021],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002469545,0.00012574029,0.030087072,0.00010609833,0.000119347824,0.00048413122,0.000577084,0.34304667,0.001225144,0.58746386,0.002083463,0.034434464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076206976,0.00014144578,0.03998623,0.00011785711,0.00009756665,0.0005581409,0.0022312503,0.27521476,0.0017938588,0.6700174,0.009710405,0.00005485775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0096317325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047932197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0096317325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002864458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001042246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020783246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974710178","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2001.tb00978.x","title":"The Formative Years: How Parenthood Creates Gender*","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Gender relations; Sociology; Gender studies; Art","score_opus":0.06587424529811188,"score_gpt":0.2870040067957065,"score_spread":0.2211297614975946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974710178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.566592,0.009415362,0.015173243,0.024133239,0.0017497947,0.00017579646,0.00020808785,0.000094391864,0.38245815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744931,0.0020048523,0.0010894103,0.0006815775,0.00015953898,0.000084798005,0.00003145454,0.000032236963,0.021422995],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477696,0.003809934,0.00008056962,0.00023261778,0.0005329455,0.00056703086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98925143,0.00719802,0.0011675035,0.00061204174,0.0008136164,0.00095743407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009901471,0.00036009314,0.00024150229,0.0015530216,0.007690231,0.008057505,0.0011073083,0.0010777807,0.009635027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020255627,0.00027053073,0.0002654876,0.0009864997,0.011551522,0.007046509,0.005519975,0.0016135958,0.00046285635],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081405284,0.00007049133,0.015024242,0.000095165335,0.000008359991,0.00091982004,0.72781575,0.00007113531,0.0003627225,0.20973432,0.002978414,0.04283812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003501716,0.00030381329,0.028122747,0.00088746106,0.000038920858,0.0018002444,0.5693896,0.00029817346,0.0011325718,0.053841498,0.34409234,0.00005765569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007821881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010265085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009901471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038058301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004159395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052364647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976492417","doi":"10.11564/23-1-315","title":"Facteurs d'Évolution de la Contribution Économique des Femmes au Niger","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"African Population Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Gender relations; Sociology; Art; Gender studies","score_opus":0.06355983661590546,"score_gpt":0.32449194237621914,"score_spread":0.26093210576031367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976492417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942398,0.0009966518,0.00015315368,0.00033046608,0.000008510766,0.0000072340085,0.00020134938,0.0000018956538,0.0040609916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997138,0.00089862995,0.00013247032,0.000024908413,0.000003929051,0.000009153022,0.000050507624,0.0000015116686,0.0017409051],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993643,0.00028688033,0.00004086008,0.00008662445,0.00006927789,0.00015198282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813545,0.0010198432,0.00041052984,0.00008705707,0.0002015335,0.00014557809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013980817,0.00013914841,0.00014373302,0.0013221004,0.0010892753,0.0008654819,0.00017647604,0.00028938206,0.0032990025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00430487,0.0001755903,0.0001270331,0.0017164112,0.0006198005,0.0005061298,0.0007881615,0.00039317601,0.00017338204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009959561,0.000020835043,0.9417527,0.00010444042,0.000027407552,0.0002435291,0.028659992,0.00014759746,0.00082400144,0.0020729455,0.00026329965,0.025783744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017015609,0.000023394045,0.97840196,0.00011885858,0.000012110205,0.00011985937,0.016183818,0.00006283845,0.0001503293,0.00024042517,0.004678666,0.0000059625318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078658104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1620427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078658104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012604275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012590825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1564005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976556915","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.510_3.x","title":"Mental Health Global Policies and Human Rights ‐ edited by Morrall, P. and Hazelton, M. and The Economics of Gender and Mental Illness ‐ edited by Marcotte, D.E. and Wilcox‐Gök, V.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociology of Health & Illness","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mental illness; Mental health; Human rights; Global mental health; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.011022840163637103,"score_gpt":0.2930642703550269,"score_spread":0.28204143019138983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976556915","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012516031,0.8174199,0.0009576114,0.038238354,0.0073871105,0.000047984107,0.0010805547,0.000100891375,0.13351604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021572387,0.72717476,0.002521031,0.005569606,0.0022516984,0.00012904439,0.0010358074,0.00015589852,0.2395898],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993855,0.00018935,0.000028385832,0.00006558055,0.00025597,0.00007524586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919516,0.00040507398,0.000104507024,0.00004251242,0.00012823312,0.00012447879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008631019,0.0014337014,0.0010934945,0.0019495859,0.0011717287,0.0050612586,0.0009506376,0.0019450901,0.054324873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022002053,0.0007954805,0.000539572,0.004948465,0.0022285858,0.004023611,0.0022315236,0.003264078,0.012471521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025637932,0.000027544256,0.00025073916,0.0008367104,0.000020663463,0.00008974601,0.0017183211,0.00021527635,0.00015362016,0.03598104,0.81991494,0.14076582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008691884,0.000011387118,0.0013977541,0.0015652274,0.000008412558,0.00016486617,0.0008918482,0.000064638545,0.0000616399,0.0149222,0.98088866,0.000014649447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020466335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034941576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054324873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037603516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067970487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1817348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976958742","doi":"10.1086/600076","title":"Is the Allocation of Resources within the Household Efficient? New Evidence from a Randomized Experiment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":312,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Pareto principle; Resource allocation; Randomized experiment; Pareto optimal; Distribution (mathematics); Pareto efficiency; Public good; Variation (astronomy); Demographic economics; Sample (material); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Statistics; Finance; Operations management; Multi-objective optimization","score_opus":0.04119652994875091,"score_gpt":0.3045562922925564,"score_spread":0.2633597623438055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976958742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9253187,0.00075831806,0.05225807,0.003594605,0.00036647997,0.0009819425,0.0005951074,0.0001049847,0.016021827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834663,0.0003231024,0.012119022,0.000911696,0.00011440787,0.00092835486,0.00018930573,0.000027626202,0.00191999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9667573,0.02691606,0.0009249716,0.0030181645,0.0016862609,0.00069722976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69997823,0.23855725,0.027963493,0.02927347,0.0027272322,0.0015003475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04527843,0.0006459247,0.0016764913,0.00032224166,0.0006210796,0.0018775075,0.0016742718,0.00174591,0.011784594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.102338016,0.00049222854,0.00091311213,0.00042818292,0.0038449264,0.0024034623,0.0011386172,0.0019964685,0.00082477136],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.19385087,0.050405294,0.09621554,0.0049932096,0.008050816,0.00095478195,0.0044439803,0.041806515,0.04028984,0.29446602,0.012411242,0.25211194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.058625326,0.06858799,0.109104745,0.0007094892,0.0049047754,0.0006390328,0.0035558494,0.17267595,0.029719446,0.51534134,0.035577428,0.00055867387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010562213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075617083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04527843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010273198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013764245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23945808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977261672","doi":"10.1007/s10108-008-9041-y","title":"On the estimation of the effect of labour participation on fertility","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spanish Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Fertility; Estimation; Instrumental variable; Econometrics; Probit model; Labour economics; Multivariate probit model; Sample (material); Demographic economics; Population; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.0340708696894203,"score_gpt":0.3100665938889339,"score_spread":0.27599572419951357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977261672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.524492,0.3805399,0.051820915,0.008682183,0.00069016346,0.00022162347,0.0036186008,0.00009094511,0.029843751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8804415,0.10105673,0.011018739,0.000485607,0.0005574987,0.00015351683,0.0023197103,0.000045149412,0.003921521],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837834,0.014319062,0.0003173345,0.0004991596,0.0008135174,0.00026746182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9193389,0.076906316,0.0012867273,0.0008846782,0.0014042333,0.000179188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028101124,0.0006911936,0.0018169277,0.00288218,0.0002592922,0.0009957008,0.0012304363,0.00091389066,0.0039992407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048546746,0.00027878798,0.0025613664,0.0036497705,0.0011336375,0.00070604624,0.0009680843,0.00080702326,0.00043285446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012942522,0.0002470535,0.43316323,0.0051109795,0.0053893407,0.0006090367,0.00094536314,0.04031748,0.0005323508,0.025644511,0.0064393175,0.48030713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025923675,0.0011964515,0.835897,0.0053647067,0.0076528797,0.0005638154,0.0026488032,0.049599368,0.0020157627,0.024542073,0.07014713,0.00011270888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03239354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022202477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03239354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009567878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026307467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14861476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977723142","doi":"10.1080/15588740903176237","title":"Welfare-to-Work Programs in America, 1980 to 2005: Meta-Analytic Evidence of the Importance of Job and Child Care Availability","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy Practice","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Welfare; Psychological intervention; Work (physics); Intervention (counseling); Meta-analysis; Child care; Labour economics; Randomized controlled trial; Foster care; Psychology; Economics; Public economics; Demographic economics; Nursing; Medicine","score_opus":0.06828838271958337,"score_gpt":0.3763630193652784,"score_spread":0.308074636645695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977723142","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039273065,0.95684266,0.0012651562,0.00054407155,0.00041436992,0.00037710767,0.0006119976,0.00004860709,0.00062302843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6500124,0.3421967,0.003835603,0.0012300605,0.00030723095,0.0011936717,0.0007751057,0.000048820915,0.00040034237],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.98632336,0.008256118,0.002718008,0.0012112306,0.0011403243,0.00035111734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97239166,0.021178113,0.0038088842,0.001044386,0.0012377128,0.00033933631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023810744,0.0017876567,0.009656399,0.0045897923,0.00057271303,0.002690405,0.0013197265,0.001908166,0.0017545577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05847169,0.0011889611,0.027525855,0.005613227,0.00085706235,0.0013685732,0.0014234288,0.0020227067,0.00012430416],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011591491,0.00012743127,0.008589774,0.09774871,0.8543755,0.0000762107,0.00018465439,0.0008320617,0.00024792386,0.00020606405,0.00065383775,0.025366295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002561048,0.0006162553,0.0070405416,0.008865004,0.97905135,0.00004310523,0.00007159463,0.00013820443,0.00021066665,0.00020269662,0.0011830066,0.000016490823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01442907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021523817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023810744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030929497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031866871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12592477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978343451","doi":"10.2202/1935-1682.2475","title":"Economic Incentives for a Healthy Diet: A Comparison of Policies in a Canadian Context","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Public economics; Incentive; Context (archaeology); Economics; Moral hazard; Psychological intervention; Environmental health; Business; Medicine; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.028234275132249933,"score_gpt":0.3600174635472321,"score_spread":0.33178318841498217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978343451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.855882,0.0051382277,0.0021937808,0.011881904,0.00016582132,0.00047907527,0.003697771,0.00010350947,0.12045795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99531686,0.0012722714,0.00077611906,0.00037959308,0.000017700298,0.000039066847,0.00035448975,0.0000075399284,0.0018363687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955473,0.0011286639,0.00007519945,0.00025224398,0.00088212406,0.0021143667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951827,0.0018247162,0.0004375063,0.00024113856,0.0012783058,0.0010356243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003516384,0.0006427437,0.0012655865,0.0018745352,0.00405239,0.0048185573,0.0019532933,0.0018652057,0.0059183585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013160495,0.00032477226,0.001206496,0.0036935986,0.0022227217,0.0011284256,0.0019413631,0.001892307,0.00013208203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004252146,0.0016052221,0.08388562,0.0010044554,0.00097379705,0.0009606029,0.0017288172,0.26232252,0.0019722288,0.5270806,0.03499389,0.07922024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004426342,0.0019627074,0.48385927,0.0009474592,0.0021007934,0.00026125717,0.015778122,0.26095274,0.0018359356,0.108648024,0.118375555,0.0008518935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9796467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98308116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09044133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09044133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.068240315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6562009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978764717","doi":"10.5354/n.v0i13.15288","title":"Derrotando el bigenerismo: cambiando supuestos de género en el siglo XXI","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Nomadías","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.029688232539345008,"score_gpt":0.29532203875926555,"score_spread":0.26563380621992055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978764717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46165103,0.016821984,0.008114856,0.04586589,0.0012897586,0.00007122033,0.000084839194,0.000032462893,0.46606797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9258325,0.005285852,0.0012953872,0.0024403578,0.00027835334,0.000045203815,0.000023817238,0.000019325053,0.06477919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999042,0.0004689263,0.000023860348,0.000108275686,0.00015482215,0.00020218917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991774,0.00036000664,0.00016144667,0.000060772098,0.00009705215,0.00014334667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001812726,0.00025107808,0.00020829578,0.0007011203,0.0046990165,0.004062072,0.0003666002,0.0013730113,0.0049217097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022288754,0.00014504622,0.00018613486,0.00083625125,0.0104687745,0.0034595218,0.003135213,0.0018939711,0.00039661524],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004384399,0.000023397959,0.006945783,0.00006111577,0.000004451492,0.00031780175,0.128534,0.00004994941,0.0005575172,0.8318399,0.0051032575,0.02651896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019315932,0.00011893638,0.01957246,0.00053897715,0.000018171686,0.0008893768,0.14524503,0.0001957566,0.0008042272,0.10272898,0.72983074,0.00003800768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054818294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012240289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054818294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019295675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017441083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01646477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979296778","doi":"10.7202/051136ar","title":"Work-Sharing Benefits in Canada: An Effective Employment Stabilization Policy Measure?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Work (physics); Business cycle; Economics; Persistence (discontinuity); Hysteresis; Econometrics; Measure (data warehouse); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Macroeconomics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03438666976251741,"score_gpt":0.27426247810926474,"score_spread":0.23987580834674732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979296778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9183794,0.0053035864,0.0021730429,0.017322311,0.00013696031,0.00026127032,0.0037583015,0.00015062503,0.05251446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951702,0.000577723,0.0006747841,0.00027603068,0.000024946843,0.000022457694,0.00031219784,0.000004004798,0.002937579],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998245,0.00019079336,0.00005675495,0.00013471647,0.0006970862,0.0006755825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839276,0.00014699568,0.0002489433,0.00006449894,0.0006135975,0.0005330891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001486413,0.00025659046,0.00039558858,0.0015105443,0.0018810664,0.0019216329,0.0012103952,0.0006331586,0.002883719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004993345,0.0000964281,0.0001922638,0.0026304978,0.0007831581,0.00063856336,0.00091202004,0.00061189296,0.000084046274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011422976,0.00068960123,0.39268765,0.00047168473,0.00021370083,0.0002230696,0.0023838857,0.040010184,0.003494169,0.098824434,0.03948453,0.4203748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013283594,0.00028910924,0.91148484,0.00024318475,0.00014924182,0.00004977235,0.0041471426,0.028944908,0.00157113,0.0046568136,0.048264064,0.000066953406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9844826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99108654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048623644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048623644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08846533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3527909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984055542","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2012-073","title":"Opting or Not Opting to Share Income Tax Information with the Census: Does It Affect Research Findings?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Census; Economics; Wage; Distribution (mathematics); Income distribution; Demographic economics; Economic inequality; Income tax; Inequality; Actuarial science; Opting out; Gross income; Labour economics; Public economics; Econometrics; State income tax; Tax reform; Sociology; Demography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05571437757677609,"score_gpt":0.3457242188894699,"score_spread":0.2900098413126938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984055542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7277938,0.039405446,0.0071029738,0.16726954,0.0022391567,0.0014419168,0.0054172585,0.00005016317,0.049279764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720499,0.0045721885,0.0031957203,0.016729906,0.0005744846,0.00055373233,0.00044555042,0.00006265416,0.0018159647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.79346853,0.13008603,0.014922571,0.012744302,0.039332822,0.00944564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.33139095,0.46750215,0.13214917,0.024455141,0.039335888,0.0051666917],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.25092295,0.0005090228,0.0013908923,0.0041504907,0.0052785743,0.0072278213,0.003761827,0.0025342035,0.008247666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5834804,0.0006811523,0.0016461649,0.0104818335,0.01446929,0.0060241297,0.0029884358,0.0028588383,0.0007079253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008310188,0.00031468619,0.8127223,0.0023311255,0.0015434939,0.00051826134,0.04240205,0.00042175918,0.00029406467,0.028133009,0.015766755,0.094721414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036792102,0.00055038696,0.82017094,0.0125579275,0.0032158042,0.0004424565,0.08212196,0.0013565037,0.0027825132,0.017479757,0.058645666,0.00030820223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5945444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6040881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97946316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02053685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051644675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9237454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987035634","doi":"10.1111/1467-8462.00205","title":"A Hitchhiker's Guide to the World's Household Panel Data Sets","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Panel data; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; British Household Panel Survey; Panel survey; German; Economics; Demographic economics; Panel analysis; Labour economics; Econometrics; Geography","score_opus":0.18301228210913822,"score_gpt":0.37742186912182624,"score_spread":0.194409587012688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987035634","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015648364,0.019522613,0.37601867,0.01809609,0.0058729826,0.009531384,0.48204657,0.014666009,0.072680935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008267396,0.028160801,0.54505557,0.011797083,0.0031716896,0.027202383,0.29544652,0.008265938,0.07263261],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984248,0.009244949,0.002077821,0.0007758234,0.0032725935,0.0003807963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9275811,0.04581422,0.0019010059,0.0089165205,0.014593065,0.0011941418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02380852,0.0024967433,0.002966375,0.013456407,0.0020797697,0.0041787997,0.005433763,0.0023663952,0.07918998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10516825,0.0045090024,0.0027453392,0.02954421,0.0014026881,0.0053692413,0.004627519,0.0071295453,0.06912819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019834615,0.00006288615,0.00073152676,0.00044149222,0.00004847782,0.000053280568,0.00020501809,0.00087546033,0.00010758414,0.009473181,0.9336152,0.05436614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009906595,0.000056158962,0.006525812,0.0011461955,0.000048368955,0.00016695574,0.00044270838,0.0017524082,0.00024021734,0.02702011,0.9623942,0.000107701635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046519473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057684265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07918998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001763223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007890775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2649169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987534562","doi":"10.1002/hec.1232","title":"Care‐giver advice as a preventive measure for drinking during pregnancy: zeros, categorical outcome responses, and endogeneity","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Endogeneity; Counterintuitive; Categorical variable; Consumption (sociology); Sample (material); Excise; Advice (programming); Econometrics; Economics; Medicine; Actuarial science; Psychology; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04789747843459485,"score_gpt":0.3394741681094939,"score_spread":0.291576689674899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987534562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96313035,0.0013402462,0.029739186,0.002330555,0.00012302093,0.00033165986,0.0009462124,0.00006405974,0.0019948082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906194,0.0003414784,0.0062499144,0.00031121567,0.00007946879,0.00035857412,0.0004987533,0.000018632061,0.0015225011],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96270984,0.028950183,0.0014586649,0.002597231,0.0027411045,0.0015428817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69646287,0.25721535,0.030722462,0.011202145,0.0023837534,0.0020135161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03572629,0.0010873579,0.002143453,0.0021040596,0.0016098422,0.0025274171,0.004097946,0.0028343147,0.0069174515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08982257,0.0007878142,0.0036201011,0.0036297247,0.004610992,0.0025425642,0.0039739795,0.003848996,0.0007386407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052042864,0.0006533283,0.9634495,0.00025918908,0.0011652074,0.0004639607,0.0017507764,0.0045657493,0.00039063723,0.011481106,0.0008070221,0.014493029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040777258,0.0030933917,0.8034001,0.0005901314,0.004048064,0.00095495395,0.007022854,0.13547166,0.003034664,0.03646257,0.0052214456,0.00029251733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013361307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008764208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03572629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019620508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026415486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18894094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988091025","doi":"10.1007/s001480100106","title":"Child care workers' wages: New evidence on returns to education, experience, job tenure and auspice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Wage; Labour economics; Economics; Child care; Social policy; Demographic economics; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.03485260881919084,"score_gpt":0.30461525540584855,"score_spread":0.2697626465866577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988091025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98531115,0.008165395,0.00017779916,0.0010082378,0.000039443894,0.000008768716,0.00088489935,0.0000029763858,0.004401418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959847,0.0021601822,0.00009181304,0.00023391056,0.00008059315,0.000007995099,0.0006550971,0.0000049427044,0.00078072975],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776936,0.0008718635,0.00017067416,0.00031694767,0.00044947403,0.00042169009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9081114,0.070483044,0.012287694,0.0034399827,0.0028091464,0.0028687154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069911256,0.00038326054,0.0010111049,0.002005008,0.00091734447,0.001762633,0.0022532789,0.0018689969,0.009128786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03189426,0.0004063172,0.00095198175,0.0035850857,0.0023613968,0.0017642429,0.0019596983,0.0018272976,0.0007685411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001101985,0.00024525227,0.98194754,0.00012588101,0.00037766623,0.0001717088,0.000883917,0.0001803286,0.00011308494,0.0006541058,0.0005072826,0.013691217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039466842,0.000112689275,0.99712723,0.00007704649,0.00026053784,0.00005866203,0.0010792115,0.000075911346,0.00006301541,0.00034422704,0.00075232907,0.000009735285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042141426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0730942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042141426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009030328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010121264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08379227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989315198","doi":"10.1080/0007131022000021461","title":"Explaining gender segregation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Occupational segregation; Patriarchy; Preference; Empowerment; Inequality; Demographic economics; Gender inequality; Human capital; Sociology; Gender studies; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Mathematics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.050762242905488975,"score_gpt":0.28990359406908023,"score_spread":0.23914135116359125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989315198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43129095,0.0071778134,0.12257003,0.03264262,0.00047450504,0.00016596701,0.00049261353,0.00015741946,0.40502805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885296,0.0012290399,0.003631161,0.00037666174,0.00009883927,0.000038515976,0.00010960028,0.000020086372,0.0059664613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999086,0.00037367537,0.00002377445,0.00012626052,0.00015931307,0.00023087783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855024,0.00075236376,0.00027924008,0.00013327866,0.00018825836,0.00009657819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017990728,0.00047829017,0.00040379743,0.0013030309,0.0021493256,0.0019315805,0.00070145103,0.0011402549,0.009571236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061408123,0.00017010923,0.0005171872,0.0014830035,0.0040525957,0.0029864034,0.002669915,0.0009987516,0.00082641427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019614883,0.000025576384,0.016846836,0.000041185136,0.0000072927805,0.0003596988,0.005535862,0.0013868656,0.00011658716,0.94735545,0.0031092132,0.025195878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013378068,0.000017480703,0.010686448,0.000098448916,0.000012041841,0.00036479064,0.005979452,0.008813551,0.0001885467,0.9424546,0.031359486,0.000011793916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008566471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040887026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009571236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002324843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013212777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03201896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989501125","doi":"10.1177/0268580909102916","title":"Household Surveys as a Source of Data for Event History Analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Socioeconomic status; Hazard; Event data; Poverty; Econometrics; Data source; Sociology; Geography; Demographic economics; Computer science; Demography; Economics; Economic growth; Data mining; Population","score_opus":0.08814675501875165,"score_gpt":0.35952211428416364,"score_spread":0.271375359265412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989501125","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0093749175,0.0014116014,0.9485577,0.0013857344,0.00069157756,0.002076846,0.019754332,0.0013276852,0.0154196555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.099371605,0.0026872132,0.86822027,0.0008254649,0.00085907534,0.007154013,0.015145132,0.0004304558,0.005306764],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9701838,0.023632037,0.0014911899,0.0010920413,0.0033494597,0.00025144953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9305425,0.046149872,0.004937756,0.01128226,0.006240417,0.0008470936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017789429,0.00060241873,0.00097341015,0.007094857,0.00078488956,0.0022430602,0.001418839,0.0009251632,0.010742589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059874874,0.00083066936,0.00056048395,0.008849894,0.00062869623,0.0018963731,0.0023709633,0.001702853,0.002635731],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018718727,0.000355562,0.039073702,0.0015712634,0.00047009083,0.0003077652,0.0040598866,0.007916387,0.001553168,0.31223392,0.06347474,0.5687962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024958065,0.00047157693,0.04661469,0.0018008184,0.00021521826,0.0005229203,0.0032872795,0.030711332,0.0028973946,0.24593177,0.6670434,0.0002540565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002235981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022270975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017789429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000836714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016670782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09408057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989773820","doi":"10.1017/s1474746409990303","title":"A LEAP forward or a LEAP back? Revelations about the Learning, Earning and Parenting (LEAP) program of Ontario Works","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Workfare; Poverty; Political science; Poverty level; Qualitative research; Sociology; Economic growth; Psychology; Demographic economics; Economics; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.033162270639099586,"score_gpt":0.33408162780650735,"score_spread":0.30091935716740775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989773820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7628861,0.0018015935,0.000752856,0.18442407,0.00019793228,0.00005975228,0.00012529567,0.000017825718,0.049734626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861254,0.0010300345,0.00021250594,0.003200688,0.00003254092,0.000031153453,0.000013203032,0.000009000698,0.009345462],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960228,0.0013354383,0.000063581756,0.00019441271,0.0007749272,0.0016088532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99554104,0.0016229277,0.00054004806,0.00019034118,0.0008579623,0.0012476445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005119212,0.00015121803,0.00024146498,0.0004333604,0.03159034,0.0037392054,0.0010539582,0.001726773,0.0028532029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009278623,0.00022887692,0.00014705115,0.000965668,0.016883709,0.0021131197,0.0030231937,0.003046615,0.00011926932],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008204728,0.000066200024,0.02472048,0.00014345057,0.000009311687,0.0008319493,0.8567346,0.0001562854,0.0011318588,0.06699129,0.016138455,0.03299413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011922127,0.00005615667,0.03696129,0.00021370489,0.0000104337,0.000094532086,0.8182461,0.00008327929,0.00044859428,0.003264561,0.14056951,0.00003996752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93471277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9730004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9385777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06142231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.093739755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44565213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992148114","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.10.021","title":"Only Mine or All Ours: Do Stronger Entitlements Affect Altruistic Choices in the Household","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Grand Challenges Canada","keywords":"Earnings; Consumption (sociology); Affect (linguistics); Economics; Preference; Social preferences; Population; Microeconomics; Demographic economics; Psychology; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.047471233106432004,"score_gpt":0.30961017569497584,"score_spread":0.26213894258854387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992148114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967153,0.00003920839,0.000045081564,0.000552579,0.0000064180754,0.0000014374572,0.000014951789,6.8712853e-7,0.0026242856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994524,0.0000139377635,0.00001946342,0.000060613478,0.0000017296229,0.0000011180573,0.000005050967,6.6975565e-7,0.000444888],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932885,0.00041986245,0.000009846601,0.000043657852,0.00003984532,0.00015795375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957865,0.0014413407,0.0011704367,0.00021040544,0.00016090798,0.0012303023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001343177,0.0001038659,0.00021111844,0.00021802117,0.0011941083,0.001408598,0.00020728991,0.00089534215,0.005694368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045012357,0.00019262344,0.00014638744,0.00023195232,0.0014926312,0.00070259714,0.00085306924,0.0008041955,0.0003688457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016507942,0.001216665,0.9392421,0.000046906393,0.00026368082,0.00045197565,0.014809892,0.0009892336,0.0041823382,0.017411198,0.0022965085,0.017438697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042598575,0.00021180487,0.97341883,0.000020503794,0.00005090618,0.000086136715,0.016665217,0.0005357513,0.00032495565,0.0065660407,0.0020529479,0.000024399556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045306957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01126302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005694368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056003965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003812881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019049525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992684798","doi":"10.3138/cpp.39.2.241","title":"Quebec, Daycare, and the Household Strategies of Couples with Young Children","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Child care; Demographic economics; Rest (music); Division of labour; Labour economics; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.013275873994971151,"score_gpt":0.2243280461011413,"score_spread":0.21105217210617014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992684798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96185976,0.003714316,0.000121975805,0.004789486,0.00003935533,0.00003237454,0.0007541886,0.0000076129527,0.02868101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942615,0.0011676813,0.000090830414,0.00027250696,0.000006271705,0.00001225404,0.00013120344,0.0000024772012,0.0040553464],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992298,0.00022656147,0.000010999815,0.000036931287,0.000095010946,0.00040064973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908817,0.000112140275,0.00017530593,0.00002573077,0.00018176629,0.00041685277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076657726,0.0001479912,0.00019576166,0.0006785279,0.005521844,0.0015793677,0.00059604185,0.00047335637,0.004918313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013786514,0.00010012222,0.00021351161,0.0011871923,0.0014855695,0.00047495455,0.00077969447,0.00046043276,0.00012825402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015260885,0.00024636197,0.815373,0.00011804242,0.000079656376,0.0006909768,0.05691053,0.0006977527,0.0006724591,0.01909032,0.013883113,0.09208523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013975948,0.000044346947,0.89753574,0.00018021268,0.000018793176,0.00011315904,0.062168397,0.00019024507,0.00012870209,0.0006709962,0.038914505,0.000020984025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98338205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03126663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03126663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020811679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22685635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993299296","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2013.04.003","title":"On refutability of the Nash bargaining solution","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining problem; Economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Subgame; Nash equilibrium; Epsilon-equilibrium; Best response","score_opus":0.028164037395038904,"score_gpt":0.26955963496009033,"score_spread":0.24139559756505144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993299296","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1183818,0.002040113,0.5431632,0.049164966,0.0030153662,0.0005273027,0.00081694766,0.0005940327,0.2822963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8573651,0.0018056633,0.10231806,0.0056906757,0.0019541448,0.0010025341,0.0007005377,0.0005407248,0.028622553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98708075,0.0072899186,0.0006070377,0.0018274345,0.0018892197,0.0013056874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.875243,0.10626076,0.0023429783,0.008457469,0.006386106,0.001309771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019163271,0.0012391325,0.0033737267,0.002981414,0.0057517076,0.0055902773,0.0068699596,0.009446096,0.021977328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17452875,0.001148162,0.003954171,0.003031192,0.012827426,0.016400494,0.008475152,0.013248337,0.0025596262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008711328,0.000039259045,0.00018314882,0.0000705099,0.000028843222,0.000098006414,0.00022529044,0.0054583293,0.00009970646,0.9866477,0.0034586168,0.00360343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030303183,0.000006422545,0.000020553043,0.000025660012,0.0000068690415,0.000019829127,0.000043464508,0.010280719,0.00005860531,0.9888164,0.0006827098,0.00000866025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031669573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001655319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021977328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031164882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055620493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101346254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994255920","doi":"10.1007/s10644-014-9155-1","title":"Female employment in MENA’s manufacturing sector: the implications of firm-related and national factors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Change and Restructuring","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Economic Research Forum; World Bank Group","keywords":"Logit; Manufacturing sector; Demographic economics; Middle East; Ordered logit; Economics; Private sector; Foreign ownership; Econometric model; Business; Labour economics; Economic growth; Political science; Foreign direct investment; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.09262980340248449,"score_gpt":0.2961067696667497,"score_spread":0.2034769662642652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994255920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99512047,0.0002676924,0.000024428113,0.0015651066,0.000016733218,0.0000025642871,0.00003914177,6.9792856e-7,0.0029631006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987739,0.00012444457,0.000012714583,0.00009590449,0.000013517795,0.0000030796007,0.000024056628,9.1351296e-7,0.00095146085],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993493,0.00017273825,0.00001812322,0.00004641049,0.00006469707,0.0003487805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908876,0.00025353217,0.00017426739,0.000025519566,0.00009013213,0.00036772978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078847964,0.00010422069,0.00015695377,0.0006502591,0.0021205714,0.0012046288,0.00040239564,0.00049114216,0.006198953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015818403,0.00012673969,0.00021068248,0.00080375455,0.00087318633,0.0008713503,0.0011595854,0.00075087766,0.0003576596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016663091,0.00023477132,0.96929955,0.0000233124,0.000019686557,0.00047861476,0.011688309,0.00010087629,0.000531213,0.004119925,0.001101808,0.012235349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050465515,0.000062861945,0.9517934,0.00003874881,0.000007158396,0.00016200339,0.042723507,0.0001761933,0.00016441543,0.00038949936,0.0044716154,0.0000055469523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03134546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07248252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03134546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014289967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014338188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062326014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994570475","doi":"10.1007/s11113-007-9033-x","title":"The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: a review of the literature","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Population Research and Policy Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":644,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Imperfect; Economics; Empirical evidence; Developed country; Developing country; Demographic economics; Public economics; Population; Economic growth; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.2911103288434083,"score_gpt":0.562643414175933,"score_spread":0.2715330853325247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994570475","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001881422,0.9993894,0.000011979473,0.00022651839,0.000042327698,0.0000019549614,0.00002956813,6.289672e-7,0.00010940454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011575345,0.99867564,0.000025832534,0.00007295555,0.000039958388,0.0000032223866,0.0000123468635,1.8730566e-7,0.000012355934],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834466,0.0006720185,0.00032453425,0.00020712531,0.0003680918,0.00008350609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99338937,0.005043524,0.00088647957,0.00005214325,0.0005195314,0.00010891055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004193565,0.0008241931,0.0026796383,0.005234425,0.00045705205,0.0020230024,0.0009998035,0.0014747713,0.0025805628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0091811055,0.00046174054,0.0014008819,0.010189592,0.0010263978,0.0013607776,0.0011286938,0.0009913505,0.00020890839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026906998,0.000065815606,0.005421093,0.22021794,0.0016980108,0.00034365378,0.0004597313,0.0008702475,0.00018168132,0.0034391757,0.016676826,0.75035673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015088869,0.00040845104,0.053911146,0.37883624,0.009612475,0.0020479641,0.0030462297,0.0003448147,0.00050386303,0.005013973,0.5459921,0.00013191595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013040629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028963646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013040629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019707463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009709819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025929451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996331474","doi":"10.1007/s12147-001-0008-7","title":"Gender differences in the Canadian economy, with some comparisons to the United States (Part I: Labour force characteristics)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gender Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.06300889122042569,"score_gpt":0.2892121173108166,"score_spread":0.2262032260903909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996331474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8600662,0.033506755,0.0003033701,0.004486822,0.00027316296,0.00009727263,0.009221163,0.000022941404,0.092022315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96266145,0.015341798,0.00047232138,0.00049265625,0.00005830789,0.000036271547,0.0026888503,0.00002060741,0.01822771],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885917,0.000059450944,0.00003528323,0.00008544084,0.00034968325,0.0006109575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878365,0.00011986979,0.000110950066,0.00003454733,0.000686944,0.00026396828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093586324,0.00046773828,0.0003766011,0.007664884,0.008796678,0.0033886414,0.001021223,0.0006438792,0.0072170855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002483291,0.00023972846,0.0006979433,0.019790996,0.0022639849,0.0009465727,0.0012087104,0.0007243355,0.000474821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044311397,0.00016050575,0.7282596,0.00049389276,0.00016103148,0.0007534054,0.042285234,0.001115298,0.001448587,0.04988021,0.033467744,0.14153135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041350113,0.000027864744,0.9533648,0.00012107599,0.000029788156,0.00009276139,0.017172122,0.00010126935,0.00014107833,0.0005794601,0.028333051,0.000032623295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99871266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035682134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035682134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040327203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2588932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998959009","doi":"10.3386/w11832","title":"Universal Childcare, Maternal Labor Supply, and Family Well-Being","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":271,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Victoria","keywords":"Business; Labour economics; Economics","score_opus":0.11637047058869074,"score_gpt":0.44278373847104524,"score_spread":0.3264132678823545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998959009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98450595,0.0011446662,0.00015234832,0.001089827,0.000008269022,0.000013308406,0.0046458016,0.000009729593,0.008430089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556255,0.00066712644,0.000089661604,0.000055771103,0.000008311077,0.000009185919,0.00156586,0.0000025396523,0.002038996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970347,0.00005177013,0.000011426789,0.000027079665,0.0000753649,0.00013085926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874204,0.00022071587,0.0004170634,0.000072705625,0.0002781131,0.00026933698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004976715,0.00012203022,0.00016165058,0.0008661449,0.0006047708,0.00046419338,0.0002501264,0.00016997577,0.006049159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022844197,0.00011931403,0.00024122083,0.0010591147,0.00032472645,0.00023094978,0.00040541642,0.0003106884,0.00024730337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013711776,0.00001613805,0.9934883,0.000009894521,0.000022450999,0.00005115219,0.0001618269,0.00015323363,0.00004882815,0.00029306952,0.0007718765,0.0049694995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.423382e-7,0.0000040634286,0.99898034,0.000012261321,0.0000052244914,0.00002013066,0.00021145768,0.000081895974,0.00001874706,0.000037008154,0.00062716595,0.0000010278886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8021415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9282019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8021415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035952353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002868292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39804745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002878363","doi":"10.1177/1097184x07306735","title":"Regular Section Book Review: Doucet, A. (2006). Do Men Mother? Fatherhood, Care, and Domestic Responsibility. Toronto: University of Toronto Press","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Men and Masculinities","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Sociology; Gerontology; Gender studies; Media studies; Medicine; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.010040889503047122,"score_gpt":0.2604318551033776,"score_spread":0.2503909656003305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002878363","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028001014,0.5061051,0.0006630934,0.08413795,0.2711257,0.00077600183,0.005499642,0.00063652836,0.13077599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016782748,0.34949836,0.0006117271,0.04351023,0.08072836,0.00050508487,0.0040527564,0.00027062278,0.5191446],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999022,0.00010789327,0.00010245111,0.00009950795,0.0005796575,0.000088505214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887166,0.0028403415,0.0007449886,0.00020386347,0.0066462546,0.0008478594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012731628,0.0018837291,0.0038889942,0.006219601,0.0011693761,0.0031404404,0.0032332079,0.0049213357,0.21455303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0102132475,0.0008976058,0.0010019495,0.00798897,0.00096066867,0.0026991745,0.0016013249,0.0036752406,0.17759597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069607595,0.0000032250364,0.000017702872,0.00036885418,0.0000022649324,0.00002600226,0.000006510101,0.000009152477,0.000013202085,0.000068393696,0.988827,0.01065082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013628853,0.000011895995,0.00041499868,0.001802042,0.000011189031,0.00016409358,0.000032014388,0.000015125583,0.00003073015,0.00018081015,0.9973105,0.00001302557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026623597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056899436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21455303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037341071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053263865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7177514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005524516","doi":"10.1007/s001480100099","title":"Employment and child-care choices of single-parent families in Canada and the United States","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Subsidy; Social policy; Demographic economics; Single mothers; Economics; Wage; Labour economics; Psychology; Medicine; Nursing; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.023776481941515683,"score_gpt":0.2369391402207217,"score_spread":0.21316265827920602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005524516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977538,0.00044645628,0.000016270275,0.00044292997,0.000009112473,0.000006076882,0.00054197153,0.0000011882678,0.0007821534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998307,0.00039730183,0.00003178862,0.000106333784,0.000003157734,0.0000052364385,0.00030408346,0.0000018512161,0.00084316015],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990683,0.00012977795,0.000034275567,0.00007047304,0.00015439406,0.0005427937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976781,0.00024550306,0.0003668189,0.00003464812,0.0005793651,0.0010957186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007500941,0.00021479165,0.0005676105,0.0011865993,0.005771077,0.0020922837,0.0012973518,0.0008954479,0.0029349923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023341898,0.00030345615,0.0006828861,0.003187731,0.0012640818,0.0005814435,0.0012118806,0.0012081427,0.00020488437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021001665,0.00018213737,0.982852,0.000020318652,0.000070685164,0.00026622802,0.007316567,0.0003470295,0.000117286494,0.000637499,0.0013749179,0.0066053295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019111905,0.000044954184,0.9662772,0.00006742755,0.000031099116,0.00009785999,0.031266604,0.00046545843,0.00006672326,0.00014362774,0.0014996236,0.000020288155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99736553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02047379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02047379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023401497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14854848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006128255","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4932.2008.00486.x","title":"The Impact of Lifecycle Events on Women's Labour Force Transitions: A Panel Analysis*","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Record","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Panel data; Economics; Childbirth; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Pregnancy; Finance","score_opus":0.027632134919408077,"score_gpt":0.28634408539047607,"score_spread":0.258711950471068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006128255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942199,0.0002823059,0.0012278297,0.00024796717,0.000015021126,0.000026958543,0.002715623,0.000014789881,0.001249724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99543864,0.00015948986,0.00025980457,0.000070336704,0.000015129219,0.00003659535,0.0029243587,0.0000064221413,0.001089295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970751,0.0018255657,0.0000740636,0.0002598691,0.00016035145,0.0006050683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915834,0.0054694535,0.001323972,0.000679243,0.0002388828,0.0007050048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037138755,0.00033189793,0.00069206004,0.00066452584,0.000748409,0.00096244493,0.00067154685,0.0009803893,0.0060812244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067737056,0.00034240392,0.0021399425,0.0012277378,0.00049889216,0.00069572753,0.001560083,0.0015383704,0.00077459303],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001022127,0.00031468837,0.976918,0.000043503947,0.0016758892,0.00033028098,0.0006844188,0.0064422768,0.0006811493,0.00072723895,0.0017050704,0.009455428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021993563,0.00033448057,0.9861036,0.000025946478,0.00046621045,0.00007329286,0.0007163206,0.009829361,0.00023579014,0.00043267233,0.0017272284,0.000032995886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029302932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028102744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029302932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054288073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048302143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058264732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006720023","doi":"10.1080/00036840601032185","title":"Semiparametric quantile Engel curves and expenditure elasticities: a penalized quantile regression spline approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Engel curve; Quantile regression; Quantile; Econometrics; Economics; Nonparametric statistics; Mathematics; Spline (mechanical); Smoothing; Statistics; Price index","score_opus":0.03386574123572352,"score_gpt":0.26766727316363415,"score_spread":0.23380153192791062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006720023","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030384162,0.0002589902,0.96660554,0.00027219008,0.000019556759,0.00003871131,0.00030162907,0.00028073956,0.0018384786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8192497,0.0009208313,0.1702472,0.00013673281,0.00010580302,0.00031144338,0.0017550439,0.00025105427,0.007022304],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971993,0.0020387452,0.000091936396,0.00024989806,0.0002506944,0.00016949893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894203,0.007790222,0.00076880644,0.0013175596,0.00058791984,0.00011516035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008049604,0.0007260553,0.001503358,0.0017155209,0.00034776147,0.001431096,0.0015459536,0.0009412886,0.0036553666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029739598,0.0005176332,0.0014407693,0.0023449243,0.0009981181,0.0015745987,0.0015567206,0.0018241883,0.00067078095],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015152484,0.000099111385,0.015027518,0.00013277338,0.00036181905,0.00017731613,0.0003724327,0.66865313,0.0005492613,0.20582484,0.003167186,0.10548311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001282481,0.00003499362,0.0043091974,0.0000407436,0.00003876212,0.000069018235,0.00009066827,0.88690937,0.0002111982,0.10600374,0.0022477289,0.000031798274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004609887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030892468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008049604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065154204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079820224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04257089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006908034","doi":"10.1159/000278595","title":"A Follow-up Study of Transsexualists: Social and Economic Aspects","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychiatria Clinica","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Download; Subject (documents); Library science; Social media; Psychology; History; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.048328208230509026,"score_gpt":0.3727337717821998,"score_spread":0.32440556355169076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006908034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952916,0.0014372115,0.00003172051,0.00067137013,0.000045525452,0.000167654,0.00066226325,0.0000020969544,0.0016906274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98798114,0.003259868,0.00019633023,0.0010100222,0.0001267346,0.00056399,0.001003291,0.000005893742,0.005852653],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908566,0.00028094777,0.00008290754,0.00007935469,0.00027294064,0.00019816578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99605054,0.0006966821,0.0012602134,0.0002401964,0.00077669264,0.000975792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015153642,0.00024665016,0.0006208769,0.002440961,0.0033286659,0.0012643243,0.00066153693,0.00118291,0.005993863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005407541,0.0005292701,0.0005226603,0.002663166,0.00052248273,0.0019636406,0.001362954,0.0015932764,0.0016138339],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010267842,0.0029271443,0.93472975,0.0001972917,0.00010911777,0.0018952525,0.02753453,0.000017790831,0.00047125822,0.00022524566,0.0050822035,0.025783613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040541538,0.000699642,0.9841787,0.000100545,0.000047570116,0.00037036414,0.012188931,0.0000178802,0.00007483109,0.0000474372,0.0022143025,0.00001917285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043830667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069356926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043830667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013420039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012853722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08715105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006996873","doi":"10.1111/1475-4932.00025","title":"Cross‐National Variation in the Labour Market Participation of Married Women in Australia, Canada and the United States of America","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Record","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); Differential (mechanical device); Regional variation; Demographic economics; Economics; Political science; Geography; Labour economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.025604985781645342,"score_gpt":0.2768317092315412,"score_spread":0.2512267234498959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006996873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983456,0.0002609049,0.000059110534,0.000060570324,0.0000045825404,0.000007352213,0.00033779806,0.0000027144597,0.00092130917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982836,0.00029574972,0.00008899236,0.000040455183,0.0000026579387,0.000009219304,0.0006249809,0.0000023723262,0.000651942],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993474,0.00010158265,0.000035858462,0.000092172224,0.00022861459,0.00019442276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998147,0.00029679248,0.00027824123,0.00006397454,0.00077538256,0.000438676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078031095,0.0001492455,0.00031162464,0.0015368653,0.0012955804,0.00071681995,0.00043070878,0.00025583734,0.0011367146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002845631,0.00015361086,0.00028128942,0.002923736,0.0005180133,0.00027139127,0.0008720937,0.0004013006,0.00014971744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044097975,0.0000326971,0.98553354,0.000022346316,0.00013423439,0.000084882886,0.0036552965,0.00012844453,0.00022710163,0.00023197381,0.0005899746,0.00931543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.238228e-7,0.00000545438,0.9985985,0.0000052235805,0.0000067843184,0.000019605332,0.0008883573,0.00006626399,0.000018564435,0.000010585426,0.0003768128,0.0000031104507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9256256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9695118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07437438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003990354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031995135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1496247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007100734","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.09.012","title":"Estimation of collective household models with Engel curves","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Econometrics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Engel curve; Econometrics; Economics; Equivalence (formal languages); Estimation; Consumption (sociology); Bargaining power; Scale (ratio); Microeconomics; Mathematics; Price index; Geography","score_opus":0.1703286526948699,"score_gpt":0.26893012057829063,"score_spread":0.09860146788342072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007100734","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3592037,0.00044012786,0.63363767,0.0008218096,0.000059435566,0.00008350363,0.00046662745,0.00028456902,0.005002598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513619,0.0002985887,0.04186456,0.00005328422,0.000044292752,0.00015947329,0.0006494548,0.00007928332,0.0054891375],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982994,0.0011992108,0.00006355727,0.00019136029,0.00008363085,0.00016287396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835265,0.01402033,0.00080837274,0.00095264387,0.00039724173,0.00029482262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005780088,0.0007294967,0.0025827694,0.001149739,0.0006648901,0.0022468294,0.00201152,0.0022613711,0.004769223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02365438,0.0009127563,0.0018256032,0.0016370376,0.0012796103,0.0023445685,0.001965983,0.0015054968,0.00061631185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051234867,0.00003951723,0.0038148288,0.000034937144,0.000097669246,0.00006498448,0.00021697198,0.94639385,0.00005351925,0.040968087,0.0006451555,0.0076191872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014750734,0.000011231222,0.00052304706,0.000009735611,0.00001369374,0.000008255141,0.00007759008,0.9697958,0.000038397022,0.029214295,0.0002833338,0.000009972436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0137992315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070090406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0137992315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011429415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013766801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030568361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009979255","doi":"10.1257/pol.3.3.175","title":"Do Child Tax Benefits Affect the Well-being of Children? Evidence from Canadian Child Benefit Expansions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Economic Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":394,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Mental health; Test (biology); Child health; Psychology; Physical health; Health benefits; Medicine; Psychiatry; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.016369905490315383,"score_gpt":0.25854375502022064,"score_spread":0.24217384952990526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009979255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9178291,0.038483754,0.00012919119,0.008077781,0.000072398674,0.00004983453,0.009054333,0.000014233049,0.02628937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98415136,0.01183582,0.00009515588,0.00060212787,0.000025839976,0.000011081472,0.0016192335,0.0000054012653,0.00165392],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984345,0.00024312228,0.000062359104,0.0001454044,0.00061231316,0.0005022174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919127,0.0023548263,0.0023837094,0.00038936702,0.0020153692,0.00094402995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023730937,0.00027019077,0.0005359647,0.0014817648,0.0019322737,0.001757915,0.0011714268,0.00075575156,0.0058902423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009548399,0.00021786118,0.000643551,0.003996378,0.0015847515,0.00041183905,0.0010032023,0.0010383703,0.00023089715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007310697,0.00012369434,0.94015604,0.00034894567,0.00039565965,0.00024846176,0.0016517474,0.00078301725,0.00012284581,0.0030376718,0.006893901,0.045506977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022095057,0.000029657442,0.9936697,0.00016056088,0.00013655022,0.000027557493,0.0006516746,0.000095329604,0.00005317578,0.00014391789,0.0049982574,0.000011599023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98886883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9918094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021581309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021581309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016782666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15658408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010315612","doi":"10.1257/aer.103.1.438","title":"Children's Resources in Collective Households: Identification, Estimation, and an Application to Child Poverty in Malawi","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":293,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Economics; Clothing; Estimation; Consumption (sociology); Identification (biology); Household income; Demographic economics; Private good; Engel curve; Labour economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Geography; Public good; Microeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.00966670968582522,"score_gpt":0.275175782116559,"score_spread":0.2655090724307338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010315612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99020886,0.000676548,0.0076456307,0.00046350763,0.000004990898,0.000040011633,0.0003734438,0.000014210588,0.0005728312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922874,0.00068134477,0.005505903,0.000025837313,0.000009543182,0.000072611125,0.00047936695,0.000004933179,0.0009330868],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999071,0.00062194106,0.000034042736,0.00009017644,0.000051581203,0.00013117706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355984,0.004818267,0.0009192427,0.00027741748,0.00021720344,0.00020798403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004369359,0.0004941306,0.0008721897,0.0013335409,0.00095404155,0.001523697,0.00097473635,0.0008066918,0.00266505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011471279,0.00048265603,0.0007343982,0.0031466328,0.0010702142,0.0009872039,0.0023415056,0.0011480483,0.00015568487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008454844,0.00011321971,0.910344,0.000098498305,0.00028760877,0.000519813,0.0022144807,0.04565147,0.00020001692,0.009056444,0.0011024446,0.030327503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053374206,0.00021257465,0.57920647,0.00027356602,0.00022481263,0.00036893343,0.01349888,0.38360173,0.0005448345,0.017107215,0.0048457384,0.0000619304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11181021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11498325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11181021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018201987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013578138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22231883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010392029","doi":"10.1007/s11150-005-6695-1","title":"Combining Stated and Revealed Preference Data to Construct an Empirical Examination of Intrahousehold Bargaining","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Economics; Bargaining power; Microeconomics; Consumption (sociology); Construct (python library); Revealed preference; Econometrics; Aggregate (composite); Computer science","score_opus":0.1569246611593818,"score_gpt":0.3213782689395091,"score_spread":0.1644536077801273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010392029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87408984,0.0028975054,0.09784791,0.00096323196,0.00006535519,0.00017658444,0.0028812478,0.00006199973,0.021016324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804735,0.001384438,0.012761979,0.00019062463,0.000053464726,0.00014715266,0.0016961243,0.000018190303,0.003274509],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99214464,0.0054787635,0.000365184,0.00041860426,0.0013289527,0.00026385975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.868469,0.10642748,0.011291616,0.007867587,0.005308079,0.00063617725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0152368415,0.0005466403,0.0012074526,0.0022890791,0.0008408168,0.0029676205,0.0020272338,0.0014736932,0.008906546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07573285,0.0004407964,0.0007846779,0.0061384994,0.0014742456,0.006628966,0.0017091573,0.0024983624,0.0015031297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003092801,0.002933173,0.39159343,0.0016671222,0.0013523203,0.00040761282,0.005285732,0.03446998,0.003434296,0.3611715,0.005659711,0.18893228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003547094,0.0031035794,0.26966986,0.0008442674,0.0007830419,0.0011811142,0.018592384,0.2583482,0.009309984,0.41696912,0.020373026,0.00047076945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004254995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005872051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0152368415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011499724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093746686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08058107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010732054","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.02.001","title":"Breaking the cycle? The effect of education on welfare receipt among children of welfare recipients","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Graduation (instrument); Welfare; Endogeneity; Economics; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010691734521931543,"score_gpt":0.2649600069954881,"score_spread":0.25426827247355654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010732054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99246216,0.00071611436,0.000027603704,0.0044278093,0.000031862426,0.00000912242,0.0003570547,0.0000027976794,0.0019655237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985341,0.0002804231,0.00002130243,0.0003421672,0.000023771083,0.0000057640746,0.00009848876,0.0000028183358,0.00069125305],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976629,0.00070142274,0.00006116599,0.00011773043,0.00012513183,0.0013316721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921827,0.002978984,0.0021571447,0.00028491087,0.00042726073,0.0019690802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020929906,0.00020149117,0.00054397836,0.0006900099,0.0011236747,0.0017831764,0.0009990827,0.0021658775,0.015838373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013058365,0.00024418716,0.0008671812,0.0012603855,0.0011541916,0.0017531535,0.0024970258,0.0020868122,0.00058147695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073183584,0.0005896948,0.9751672,0.000035597724,0.00010732025,0.00020967427,0.0021067325,0.00020067948,0.00015753978,0.0025193698,0.0014208,0.016753415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068323825,0.00018753544,0.9883632,0.000110968955,0.00012028772,0.00007691252,0.008487757,0.00017485445,0.00012054243,0.00089810276,0.0013767311,0.000014727822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07161843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11532757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07161843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014611448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034824428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14240313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013238662","doi":"10.1007/s00181-010-0387-2","title":"An analysis of the impact of the self-sufficiency project on wages","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Empirical Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Wage; Economics; Welfare; Demographic economics; Treatment and control groups; Percentage point; Randomized experiment; Work (physics); Labour economics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029221598776911564,"score_gpt":0.35047111505201906,"score_spread":0.3212495162751075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013238662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.947656,0.0007591929,0.0026006496,0.0024040672,0.000025444391,0.000046095465,0.00018503626,0.000014237649,0.0463093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669254,0.00017014302,0.00017448542,0.0000588403,0.00001172378,0.000011466536,0.000023456561,0.000003799325,0.0028534618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878484,0.000703675,0.000021120983,0.000047155223,0.00014971658,0.00029362045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98709273,0.010289012,0.00081757066,0.00032325755,0.0006253562,0.00085211336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023997736,0.00025036882,0.0004956122,0.0008758394,0.0008894586,0.0012391849,0.00070977863,0.0007170683,0.01843844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012097274,0.00016072011,0.00055274495,0.0010968398,0.0019152437,0.0010297603,0.0012992598,0.0011247311,0.00031665512],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002541212,0.0021868262,0.16411722,0.00033934516,0.0002151897,0.0013550215,0.0019490039,0.034416568,0.002153517,0.6763308,0.0051112087,0.1092842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046960462,0.0031556475,0.5662008,0.00038313027,0.0004506777,0.0006375884,0.01668054,0.06523721,0.0037691533,0.3221904,0.02075149,0.00007375725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005388719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069618803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01843844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016682873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017772906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0616827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013802913","doi":"","title":"La théorie des modèles non coopératifs d'offre de travail et ses applications empiriques","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Identifiability; Economics; Testability; Mathematics; Econometrics; Statistics","score_opus":0.037357270083738195,"score_gpt":0.34416134407192717,"score_spread":0.306804073988189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013802913","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22380538,0.0057286103,0.67611384,0.006350665,0.0002082136,0.00019510988,0.00045802208,0.00012412826,0.08701597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9167661,0.004269803,0.056919713,0.00030981094,0.00011004245,0.00041170456,0.0002163545,0.000068177076,0.020928312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965243,0.0018261387,0.0001381775,0.000555153,0.00066108594,0.00029516628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98762566,0.008807808,0.0012874795,0.0012833851,0.000646759,0.00034896884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00638669,0.001077803,0.0016572935,0.001281333,0.0013428158,0.0044201952,0.0031388004,0.0030822575,0.009720871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01613297,0.00082685426,0.0024396772,0.0019903195,0.004001475,0.0038431208,0.0025962812,0.003067602,0.0009027881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042050324,0.00011769361,0.0056758225,0.00019240027,0.00011889156,0.00024791373,0.0015814904,0.12705252,0.00039955444,0.85047436,0.0010481868,0.013049157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071106384,0.00012998041,0.0025714964,0.00017365439,0.000096896685,0.00021852255,0.0009827225,0.30422553,0.0003362908,0.6798097,0.011332402,0.000051818988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016909134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010418555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016909134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035970788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036357136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033776402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016711156","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00223.x","title":"Child Care Subsidies and Employment Behavior Among Very‐Low‐Income Populations in Three States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Policy Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Subsidy; Welfare; Quarter (Canadian coin); Earnings; Welfare reform; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economics; Work (physics); Spell; Child care; Income Support; Single mothers; Psychology; Finance; Medicine; Sociology; Accounting","score_opus":0.09718968068876964,"score_gpt":0.45433444096140524,"score_spread":0.3571447602726356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016711156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994974,0.000072706025,0.000046276196,0.00003321985,0.0000011842626,0.000005069301,0.00021763779,0.0000011140746,0.00012538128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999506,0.00006569438,0.000049049195,0.000017538918,0.0000017510066,0.000010130517,0.00028944563,3.922577e-7,0.00005991578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990761,0.00045910882,0.000059424736,0.0001087403,0.00012455788,0.00017198267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685246,0.0008534124,0.0016263261,0.000120343604,0.00025648708,0.00029096848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015018471,0.00012146461,0.00029726556,0.0011226166,0.0007221874,0.0007882073,0.0004222997,0.00034106168,0.0009179206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035253628,0.00020715693,0.0004658876,0.0016760597,0.00044565002,0.00024950667,0.0009023744,0.0005237754,0.00008317697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041669213,0.00006759131,0.9976993,0.000006768146,0.000062166335,0.0000121467565,0.00026757806,0.00011028872,0.00007283843,0.000072372015,0.00011725749,0.0014700507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035640908,0.000034445777,0.99897814,0.00000670146,0.000033194236,0.000008740683,0.0005841113,0.00017126056,0.00003876819,0.000023768687,0.000115425515,0.0000019946099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.107773796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1788286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107773796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00099164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091023213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21429294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017731054","doi":"10.3386/w10769","title":"Social Networks and Trade Liberalization","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; International economics; Free trade; Liberalization; International trade; Market economy","score_opus":0.2965597112640887,"score_gpt":0.5094873212530854,"score_spread":0.21292760998899668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017731054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6494533,0.0012434612,0.067378685,0.014382623,0.0001222373,0.00011559341,0.0002647249,0.00007442566,0.26696503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99333525,0.0003742381,0.0012833967,0.0001590694,0.000030735013,0.000026384141,0.000014246499,0.0000054004445,0.004771265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991049,0.0004937296,0.00001664784,0.00008678088,0.00009309519,0.00020467518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641377,0.0021863433,0.0007959158,0.00016476472,0.0001395658,0.00029957146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013053089,0.00034729217,0.00036420987,0.0006850531,0.0016354783,0.0026667907,0.0006855714,0.0014958847,0.015317369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006416975,0.0001672912,0.0005415887,0.0007687206,0.002646712,0.003174312,0.0019040058,0.0012060509,0.0003249655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007349755,0.00008741203,0.0044498644,0.0000467857,0.000035763493,0.00025953626,0.0004458126,0.07560008,0.0004205769,0.908756,0.0010013814,0.008823177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000669493,0.00011725779,0.0041674464,0.000046269117,0.00003626482,0.0001349055,0.0009907908,0.098396964,0.0002804891,0.88410366,0.011632122,0.000026885009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047147763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050377552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015317369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024964903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086846785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051241755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019277124","doi":"10.1257/aer.104.5.354","title":"Labor Supply and Household Dynamics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Welfare; Dimension (graph theory); Dynamics (music); Affect (linguistics); Labour supply; Household income; British Household Panel Survey; Labour economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.015656699069991443,"score_gpt":0.26988535912413736,"score_spread":0.2542286600541459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019277124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81458145,0.010549406,0.040968366,0.007445805,0.00010248952,0.000059055277,0.005260599,0.000060097722,0.120972745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906041,0.0032203277,0.00133344,0.00013610454,0.000051843257,0.000027985376,0.0006092562,0.0000049661444,0.0040119574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996306,0.00017849781,0.000013644673,0.000070461276,0.000048086447,0.000058582373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989801,0.00061931636,0.0002013723,0.000079747915,0.00006280678,0.00005664118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007575835,0.00012625709,0.0002589145,0.00070802815,0.00034664333,0.0008328997,0.00023485193,0.0004707618,0.0062258313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003062977,0.000112596,0.00021635213,0.0015760903,0.00044704948,0.0008665242,0.00061418005,0.00044233463,0.00042295174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011178128,0.00015432452,0.24163945,0.00023388703,0.000294024,0.0003755841,0.0030353472,0.065673344,0.0012347415,0.53879946,0.013199242,0.1352487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020594644,0.000092158414,0.4216742,0.00024366836,0.00006556203,0.00030590678,0.0037448043,0.045866594,0.0003668101,0.42779413,0.099771276,0.000054313503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008505591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006676061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008505591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083057635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034125845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020827472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020474949","doi":"10.1007/s00148-012-0426-8","title":"Working parents and total factor productivity growth","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Total factor productivity; Economics; Workforce; Current Population Survey; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Social policy; Growth accounting; Population; Economic growth; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.04137518826517744,"score_gpt":0.27952584824367777,"score_spread":0.23815065997850032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020474949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935638,0.0013253592,0.0002869526,0.0008991834,0.00003941155,0.0000039368556,0.0003340972,0.0000062089193,0.0035411585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980558,0.0005142239,0.00006419654,0.00003353992,0.00003399417,0.0000035245216,0.00013662661,0.0000024538108,0.00115559],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997702,0.00009550376,0.000015023441,0.000028437087,0.00002793359,0.000062949686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942319,0.0032554786,0.0009223781,0.00023015478,0.00033090622,0.0010292432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009372302,0.00020760063,0.00024849887,0.0007940238,0.00045169046,0.00094111235,0.00027451958,0.00057222444,0.0072741252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059733978,0.0001635779,0.0003996876,0.001067472,0.0005004969,0.000814004,0.00050824054,0.00085080473,0.00045971],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002241838,0.00012735474,0.9801753,0.000017332231,0.000059648995,0.00043345254,0.0008544068,0.0004052331,0.00012936362,0.0024275908,0.00062626327,0.014519881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024316187,0.00014154136,0.987568,0.00004684717,0.00010044714,0.0004845104,0.003694536,0.0010935148,0.00016513196,0.004577178,0.0020918858,0.000012118336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010001788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072079175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010001788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031705323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006172007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024334371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021398266","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2012-029","title":"Le soutien financier à la garde d'enfants : les effets sur le travail des femmes, le revenu des familles et les finances publiques","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03478084794560738,"score_gpt":0.27053485608559413,"score_spread":0.23575400813998676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021398266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97928077,0.0014540772,0.0023030308,0.002382721,0.00003893686,0.00007052437,0.0021380533,0.000053222662,0.012278668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899698,0.00073307235,0.00074911525,0.00014516003,0.000008247996,0.000046373592,0.00057714636,0.000009485874,0.0077616842],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947184,0.00022291073,0.000010108957,0.000067920424,0.00006708754,0.00016011133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721515,0.0012301431,0.0003740496,0.00010728736,0.00052101497,0.0005522978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015508528,0.0005225985,0.0005770106,0.0004538229,0.0010282838,0.0016598516,0.00084824045,0.001001919,0.0115459105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005625486,0.00023097222,0.00065721007,0.00075190514,0.00061701005,0.0007547444,0.00089866086,0.0010608454,0.0006185872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014866631,0.00057590083,0.6740735,0.00060229836,0.0009968374,0.0010334471,0.0033576773,0.21158463,0.0020373247,0.020705549,0.011349709,0.072196536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004251947,0.0016057495,0.7555426,0.0008492329,0.0014007527,0.00026704452,0.017348595,0.17050886,0.0024289698,0.010693774,0.038774543,0.00015480253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7414649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7672916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2585351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00764273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071879597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52011526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022993772","doi":"10.7202/013038ar","title":"Effets redistributifs d’un régime d’allocation universelle : une simulation pour le Québec","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02058832849311163,"score_gpt":0.2415874795148078,"score_spread":0.22099915102169618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022993772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95982474,0.00030887575,0.004773604,0.0014580227,0.00008586663,0.0001079309,0.0029116382,0.0001578403,0.030371573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836061,0.00023104723,0.0028670342,0.0001999431,0.000010063319,0.000099989324,0.0008741233,0.00004193681,0.012069784],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996501,0.0001305408,0.000010253424,0.000047316542,0.000041668347,0.000120112985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978795,0.0010611156,0.00012451017,0.000111720416,0.0005792661,0.00024387095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009483127,0.00057422847,0.00054309034,0.0005636195,0.0011623534,0.0011653495,0.0010235528,0.0016434541,0.011952773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029445007,0.00034245357,0.0008279422,0.0008717709,0.0010613297,0.00066515786,0.00059455895,0.0014242342,0.00045571406],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037059514,0.0002695722,0.018297845,0.00007520475,0.00010462316,0.00030088442,0.00021179799,0.9603657,0.00086897763,0.008485839,0.0053417566,0.0053071235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005420597,0.00034912265,0.020576427,0.0000774108,0.00013103294,0.00004200516,0.0009913166,0.96476585,0.0007213839,0.002881592,0.008853559,0.000068302994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8239321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7809415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17606789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008098352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064993473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35420954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024256270","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-4085.2005.00299.x","title":"Causal effect of early initiation on adolescent smoking patterns","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Youth smoking; Addiction; Psychology; Margin (machine learning); Demography; Demographic economics; Medicine; Economics; Political science; Psychiatry; Public health; Tobacco control; Sociology","score_opus":0.08260427635331775,"score_gpt":0.21951135466546864,"score_spread":0.13690707831215088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024256270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848125,0.0010237728,0.0038247695,0.0020880762,0.00004602246,0.000060622206,0.0026646785,0.00006159613,0.005417948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99716944,0.0002300647,0.0003150237,0.000046013556,0.000015432584,0.000009527009,0.00036594024,0.0000037571342,0.0018448151],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991358,0.0003625381,0.00004607669,0.00013498709,0.000114249466,0.00020639034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898672,0.0049539558,0.0031726458,0.0005077521,0.0005652081,0.00093316723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001605165,0.00023793225,0.0003256239,0.000786765,0.00036017055,0.0008795346,0.0005795347,0.0006388358,0.0133143375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009883354,0.00021343162,0.0008315222,0.0007658274,0.0007823428,0.0004002017,0.0006595235,0.0011979487,0.0005451171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055828554,0.00003068596,0.98967886,0.000023272582,0.0000941563,0.000049336606,0.0001204522,0.0017555645,0.00013483962,0.0022426117,0.00048359684,0.0053308243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020647669,0.00007933773,0.98310375,0.00006989342,0.00022560559,0.000087861335,0.00037753157,0.010019464,0.00041153494,0.0032529433,0.0023380998,0.000013361418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16159536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13839594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16159536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017386384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002116406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3213095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026245338","doi":"10.1086/342997","title":"Before and After TANF: The Economic Well‐Being of Women Leaving Welfare","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":181,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Earnings; Welfare; Quarter (Canadian coin); Survey of Income and Program Participation; Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Welfare reform","score_opus":0.014346344072754032,"score_gpt":0.26165836991678054,"score_spread":0.2473120258440265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026245338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972633,0.0004085709,0.00002235564,0.00014213438,0.000006335989,0.000005658783,0.0013131599,0.0000012287784,0.00083730905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965616,0.0007106695,0.000051388386,0.00006346205,0.000013724251,0.000021273818,0.0015405442,0.000001436353,0.0010359037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996013,0.000107520296,0.000027609098,0.00005109808,0.00005671089,0.00015575928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895096,0.00011434757,0.000571139,0.00004190372,0.00012047164,0.00020114283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009490733,0.00016738534,0.00021186151,0.0010623023,0.000612521,0.0008781194,0.000283072,0.00034857815,0.0014965115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025376545,0.000109939865,0.00031078883,0.0013769318,0.00021764215,0.0004517955,0.0004718942,0.00031749243,0.00027679844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066486136,0.000037754624,0.99342984,0.000013811694,0.00004394344,0.000051541007,0.00064231845,0.000037532373,0.00005876627,0.00004980228,0.0004749276,0.0050932327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016995011,0.000049365382,0.9968917,0.000015994163,0.000019732286,0.0000257903,0.001541738,0.00002598685,0.000032932356,0.000019742489,0.0013723543,0.0000030921615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08602671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18007568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08602671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009354348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089923904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17105198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027042234","doi":"10.1086/599281","title":"Accounting for Racial Differences in Marriage and Employment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Racial differences; Race (biology); Population; Labour economics; Demographic economics; White (mutation); Racial group; Black women; Sociology; Demography; Ethnic group; Biology","score_opus":0.02406240937660464,"score_gpt":0.28131319499873714,"score_spread":0.2572507856221325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027042234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84146047,0.0059363903,0.073505975,0.031940058,0.0011569605,0.00012881815,0.0022379176,0.00039949012,0.04323385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856924,0.0015439581,0.004738575,0.0007316375,0.00032237073,0.000034354576,0.00044737797,0.000031689025,0.0064577097],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991333,0.00030759652,0.000029317562,0.00016163304,0.00012467708,0.0002435464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982169,0.00069433387,0.00042035573,0.0002574107,0.00019255339,0.00021844807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002402373,0.00050114945,0.00083341973,0.0006638485,0.0011402196,0.0014162577,0.0012580707,0.0011840499,0.006965016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011070584,0.0004004452,0.0012050081,0.001000189,0.00043960172,0.0023737461,0.0012350131,0.00085119647,0.0007904228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002457663,0.00029204987,0.53975195,0.00020170427,0.0008765316,0.0008035429,0.0010947471,0.09115699,0.00085986825,0.24958616,0.014763751,0.100367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012447161,0.00019137455,0.24843186,0.00028969732,0.00056312757,0.00036695955,0.0024448333,0.36327478,0.00074672286,0.3494171,0.034037787,0.000111366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046840604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044674713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046840604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012017619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002521633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09313595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028884096","doi":"10.1007/s11205-006-9002-5","title":"When Twenty-Four Hours is not Enough: Time Poverty of Working Parents","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Indicators Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":179,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Goods and services; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Time-use survey; Basic needs; Measuring poverty; Order (exchange); Social exclusion; Quality of Life Research; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Medicine; Sociology; Public health; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.0981956230707363,"score_gpt":0.3707359405124512,"score_spread":0.27254031744171486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028884096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997218,0.00025360324,0.000035939713,0.0008231568,0.000018204311,0.000003121923,0.000078935635,8.5260194e-7,0.0015682635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994266,0.00018061549,0.000024458597,0.00006849679,0.000008922812,0.000010678181,0.00003309914,0.0000012380015,0.00024596194],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886763,0.0005321928,0.000068179754,0.00005914697,0.0001510558,0.0003216733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930633,0.0019725296,0.002582921,0.00021366292,0.0007786461,0.0013890284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021875561,0.00014589248,0.00031311242,0.0012180598,0.0019451631,0.0014813408,0.00046851384,0.0005666577,0.0021805638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010517696,0.00020719902,0.00023313229,0.0018500165,0.0011951807,0.0016825283,0.0017688458,0.0012150077,0.00012502752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013902273,0.00016317266,0.9186232,0.000047837217,0.00004077726,0.00046758426,0.05619593,0.00006806617,0.00016272697,0.0017503167,0.0023296638,0.020011757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044497915,0.00012977746,0.79149646,0.00008719597,0.000028552266,0.00030423066,0.2045357,0.00008769625,0.00013069021,0.00088315393,0.002296998,0.000015025826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014942067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023203274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014942067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088395376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013385956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029710233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030469410","doi":"10.1002/pam.1025","title":"Moving Up, Moving Out, or Going Nowhere? A Study of the Employment Patterns of Young Women and the Implications for Welfare Mothers","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Welfare; National Longitudinal Surveys; Welfare reform; Welfare system; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Longitudinal data; Single mothers; Economics; Public assistance; Public policy; Psychology; Sociology; Economic growth; Demography","score_opus":0.02487727975704034,"score_gpt":0.3229179691457291,"score_spread":0.2980406893886888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030469410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99814093,0.0002994392,0.000020622741,0.0005426344,0.000009602371,0.0000048909924,0.00003441094,4.5945413e-7,0.000946885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793893,0.000703465,0.000028920893,0.00019086168,0.00000766861,0.000015540709,0.000027130032,0.0000013756431,0.0010861228],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996018,0.00014587221,0.000015932806,0.000026878855,0.000038451763,0.0001710566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991879,0.000320119,0.00019187375,0.00001640289,0.00007603043,0.0002076576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014001842,0.00011667555,0.00023237709,0.0006165081,0.0025664724,0.0015226686,0.00032138324,0.0005343184,0.002341009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028503772,0.00027319137,0.0001879943,0.0007893558,0.00094197405,0.0011170491,0.0010177289,0.00071649184,0.00027584133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016270565,0.000226108,0.7004688,0.00006783207,0.000016469494,0.001091902,0.26955158,0.0000384999,0.0005367397,0.0016752478,0.0014944997,0.024669668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009704896,0.00015111345,0.44111192,0.00013689144,0.00001327727,0.00032670246,0.5522709,0.000059745922,0.00019383045,0.0003501381,0.0053656106,0.000010219528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018030206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033967108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018030206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009761713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011235537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035850525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031751920","doi":"","title":"Minimum Income Proposal in Québec","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Social exclusion; Order (exchange); Poverty rate; Income Support; Public economics; Economics; Business; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.018855024801558068,"score_gpt":0.23634815014676908,"score_spread":0.217493125345211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031751920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15524189,0.0042320294,0.014981209,0.06419865,0.0021311196,0.0019436252,0.107475206,0.0024553188,0.64734095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5408378,0.0014682151,0.021684643,0.01325629,0.00018211614,0.0015686709,0.027518995,0.0002635193,0.39321962],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706984,0.00051543093,0.00009891745,0.00028206842,0.0010982992,0.0009354208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935895,0.001059972,0.00018723382,0.00052991026,0.0038576357,0.000775649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003322502,0.00036933145,0.00047610342,0.0011711211,0.003911021,0.0036545142,0.0027121827,0.002119018,0.03963826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010888109,0.00042987117,0.00080837164,0.0021544562,0.0008494006,0.00095848774,0.0012126473,0.0022013267,0.002443059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005184094,0.00029678896,0.032680284,0.00029997283,0.00007970579,0.0007456288,0.0009982331,0.013218909,0.000820298,0.249451,0.6047735,0.09611723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003946581,0.00013211652,0.063695684,0.00023001594,0.000043299697,0.00012396222,0.0007946751,0.014765959,0.00055962126,0.0073057795,0.9118124,0.00014172128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98991185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98904103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0439616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0439616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.086360194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3189652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032594490","doi":"10.1006/redy.2002.0190","title":"Why Do Women Wait? Matching, Wage Inequality, and the Incentives for Fertility Delay","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Dynamics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; Incentive; Labour economics; Matching (statistics); Inequality; Wage; Investment (military); Wage inequality; Demographic economics; Population; Microeconomics; Demography; Medicine; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.02729938663854981,"score_gpt":0.2966074947763076,"score_spread":0.2693081081377578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032594490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82095534,0.02622824,0.006913898,0.11000062,0.0004256337,0.00007435125,0.00068439427,0.00003178822,0.034685787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99035853,0.0048315073,0.00050764455,0.0016065019,0.0003927439,0.000019599047,0.000042917356,0.000005560089,0.0022349954],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985611,0.00076977257,0.000049721555,0.000120916935,0.00015068144,0.0003477299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872269,0.009013808,0.0021835,0.0003423013,0.00028928617,0.00094421697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051044337,0.00012811992,0.00061540003,0.00048384976,0.0007412283,0.0014886375,0.00061130535,0.0020214682,0.008468058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022889799,0.0002518746,0.00023282376,0.00077022926,0.0016654695,0.0014625103,0.0007725802,0.0012272976,0.0004015821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023781836,0.00086118147,0.34805685,0.0005086784,0.00022405437,0.00068826746,0.003079542,0.008749372,0.0018281301,0.3255237,0.014806132,0.29329595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005524622,0.0005146134,0.24417038,0.00042303494,0.00016177878,0.00090846047,0.008496103,0.009903344,0.0009271379,0.7022631,0.031603463,0.00007611841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036731546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006511431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008468058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011302717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018644575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028328478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W203387114","doi":"10.3233/wor-2012-1317","title":"Using multiple stakeholders to define a successful return to work: A concept mapping approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Work","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Relevance (law); Outcome (game theory); Knowledge management; Work (physics); Psychology; Order (exchange); Process management; Applied psychology; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.15060371947710555,"score_gpt":0.30892299932471573,"score_spread":0.15831927984761018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W203387114","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3983077,0.0018721084,0.51191103,0.010759215,0.00016234894,0.0047828974,0.0004516011,0.00012991508,0.071623124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7968165,0.0007299725,0.19773671,0.00035719824,0.000014792822,0.0023532135,0.00011860386,0.00003169057,0.0018412204],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9742799,0.020936495,0.00079748087,0.0010342959,0.0023235113,0.00062841445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97510797,0.016779738,0.0025621927,0.0010159258,0.003639853,0.00089428073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03991529,0.0013001882,0.0006252856,0.01030068,0.0058652996,0.0077375,0.0024705373,0.0015448116,0.00326538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034526356,0.00060711894,0.0010166009,0.0071645896,0.011182917,0.014325661,0.0096633965,0.0021274642,0.000255721],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013226282,0.00027341064,0.029547311,0.0013334792,0.00008648121,0.00077342667,0.6255131,0.0020344537,0.0018588929,0.21193884,0.001802658,0.12470567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042099735,0.00024792756,0.014829407,0.0020828363,0.00007412808,0.0004944373,0.8132781,0.007351962,0.0012527129,0.13435201,0.0259042,0.000090247726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007290243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007247748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03991529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010110654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0153416395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2110948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034392644","doi":"10.7202/602253ar","title":"Les impôts sur le revenu et l’offre de travail des femmes mariées : une revue de la littérature","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04979846509403413,"score_gpt":0.28775914596307967,"score_spread":0.23796068086904554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034392644","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30449432,0.48770785,0.119144924,0.029435126,0.001950698,0.0005048055,0.0056018317,0.00024084355,0.05091961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.645629,0.26630145,0.053694084,0.005367782,0.0015407783,0.0010673861,0.0030883795,0.00034508674,0.022966107],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882796,0.0072260676,0.00057217653,0.0014325315,0.0020256422,0.0004639145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8932749,0.09478092,0.0045599043,0.0020452284,0.0045766295,0.0007625155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018150114,0.0012686278,0.0028178722,0.0017712944,0.0011127732,0.0036123558,0.0017166907,0.0022447703,0.02267481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065160014,0.00088803034,0.0035478736,0.0024831328,0.0021242464,0.0036094338,0.0021073862,0.003714202,0.0021693872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022141368,0.00047352494,0.11656668,0.017259514,0.0040208492,0.0005354173,0.0042078546,0.02051568,0.0012036129,0.04113619,0.014138233,0.7777283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035616543,0.003836521,0.37268037,0.05968054,0.006890025,0.0020211192,0.014280201,0.03729183,0.004999738,0.09433356,0.40298972,0.00064034003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030352797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037543718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030352797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028865545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004749354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095988095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034462009","doi":"10.1016/j.red.2006.12.003","title":"Class, gender and marriage","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Dynamics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Economics; Neoclassical economics; Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02379937593106783,"score_gpt":0.30537643846888585,"score_spread":0.281577062537818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034462009","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011388808,0.99761045,0.0000534294,0.00082529645,0.00046790126,0.0000015319572,0.000015609952,0.000001182637,0.000910636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014453882,0.9963207,0.00008074246,0.00048862066,0.0008045164,0.00000417828,0.00002625244,0.0000011982567,0.00082845235],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994824,0.00017321296,0.00005594735,0.00009000716,0.00016190414,0.000036395533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987625,0.00079084176,0.00007319048,0.000045395143,0.00024402924,0.00008397165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013279116,0.0007810017,0.0018822567,0.004324754,0.0009178538,0.0025004486,0.0011243364,0.0018239131,0.006610118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029561287,0.00045453748,0.0003618228,0.0083002765,0.002590648,0.0030306617,0.0012653057,0.0019515593,0.0014047534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091371374,0.000107253916,0.0019014186,0.008032665,0.00014473281,0.00010540216,0.00056447013,0.00034813973,0.00025164263,0.02352234,0.1367764,0.82815427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014956504,0.000045172703,0.0062234793,0.007862033,0.00009506367,0.0002968331,0.0008938777,0.00006735735,0.000036821482,0.014839732,0.9696019,0.000022851427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01349394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026888575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01349394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013156014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037062105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026830852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034892152","doi":"10.1007/s13524-012-0144-6","title":"Marital Sorting and Parental Wealth","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; University of Chicago; Booth School of Business, University of Chicago; Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, University of Michigan; University of Michigan; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Marriage market; Sorting; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Spouse; Wealth distribution; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Population; Econometrics; Demography; Mathematics; Inequality; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.02623137141459164,"score_gpt":0.2654202508082342,"score_spread":0.23918887939364258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034892152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972523,0.00017712278,0.0002030355,0.00007617331,0.0000031638456,0.0000030318133,0.0001516457,0.0000018828692,0.002131664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995566,0.000050986026,0.00004206177,0.0000054629563,0.0000020123425,9.54494e-7,0.00007166079,4.3291996e-7,0.00026988075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953306,0.00018686683,0.000037511913,0.000061165985,0.00008887198,0.00009252299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99622416,0.0014946439,0.0014771969,0.00034611803,0.00015628697,0.00030157066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010203968,0.000104637336,0.00020474124,0.00088505144,0.00047280936,0.0007060072,0.00017738518,0.00022720601,0.0048451335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009423761,0.00009736391,0.00013277162,0.0012801943,0.00041492283,0.00058219733,0.0006999629,0.00023504975,0.00027521115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037521484,0.000019905137,0.9899352,0.0000046685354,0.000040362087,0.000057606594,0.00042667484,0.00020538022,0.00007603106,0.0013844913,0.0001146092,0.0076975957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029805262,0.000036012632,0.99563134,0.000012824264,0.000017458504,0.0001221767,0.0007478622,0.0006764896,0.00009416051,0.002025672,0.0006282742,0.000004752305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033301343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054770745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048451335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002070878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016527901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01620859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035235135","doi":"10.1177/036319900102600203","title":"Marriage in 1901 Canada: An Ecological Perspective","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family History","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Perspective (graphical); Variation (astronomy); Regional variation; Geography; Sample (material); Demography; Marriage market; Population; Demographic economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03830520394343613,"score_gpt":0.2780134888358874,"score_spread":0.23970828489245127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035235135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90160346,0.019660292,0.0008711583,0.0068703685,0.00009684827,0.00007088207,0.010913933,0.000059243957,0.059853714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832913,0.009922719,0.0006630161,0.00039141648,0.000028469558,0.000017090395,0.0021226078,0.000014296592,0.0035490391],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992993,0.00005669365,0.000017359882,0.00010618691,0.00016213235,0.00035833166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903286,0.00005839177,0.000099146135,0.000024491595,0.0005218706,0.00026315683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007083602,0.0002971273,0.00039950377,0.005449753,0.0079298755,0.0028598798,0.0014104572,0.0005063873,0.004859382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001754734,0.00027854514,0.0004511048,0.008793216,0.0021090384,0.00079235446,0.0014518283,0.0009895656,0.0002822242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009826011,0.000083425206,0.8415446,0.00035936382,0.00014750309,0.0008124733,0.025724439,0.001976885,0.0004950382,0.024648543,0.013885373,0.090224035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003334099,0.000019563939,0.9469915,0.00015230737,0.000033962242,0.00021591513,0.015698278,0.0006621249,0.0000812299,0.00083031046,0.03528072,0.00003074501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99949265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07410744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07410744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05677761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5376896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036076192","doi":"10.1007/s00148-014-0528-6","title":"Compensating for unequal parental investments in schooling","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Consumption (sociology); Demographic economics; Redistribution (election); Investment (military); Multiplicative function; Econometrics; Survey data collection; Labour economics; China; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03934528047955961,"score_gpt":0.30902254478741487,"score_spread":0.26967726430785527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036076192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775325,0.00034411138,0.0055414997,0.0021375748,0.00005932042,0.000029714214,0.00026188378,0.000050157494,0.0140433125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997572,0.000054628705,0.00035707012,0.000069554255,0.0000142422305,0.0000055930295,0.00003597775,0.0000044135695,0.0018865669],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904305,0.00023638832,0.000047956088,0.00012161986,0.000086373584,0.00046456838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945312,0.0023100208,0.0011728944,0.0009145611,0.00036335367,0.0007079319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020332981,0.00031884896,0.00059998885,0.0004708197,0.0005484672,0.0012152803,0.0005713865,0.0013483797,0.009977534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010690943,0.00027614657,0.0004002273,0.00048937293,0.0010220478,0.0010584848,0.0012936114,0.00096666766,0.00036506742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011282939,0.0006925121,0.48051268,0.00016180509,0.00039307316,0.0029674186,0.0015067963,0.027517809,0.0071427925,0.40326205,0.0035130822,0.07120156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039624228,0.00041965215,0.5934661,0.00011600921,0.0003890913,0.0016392162,0.0035367804,0.031213716,0.003439579,0.36074233,0.0045686173,0.0000727342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004951241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008145544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009977534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011621568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009633202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033378243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037720024","doi":"10.1007/bf03186773","title":"Women and the reform of the welfare system: An introduction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gender Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fell; Quarter (Canadian coin); Welfare; Welfare reform; Welfare system; Demographic economics; Economics; Economic welfare; Development economics; Labour economics; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.014517844677735816,"score_gpt":0.2522456428816157,"score_spread":0.2377277982038799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037720024","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077196094,0.71933174,0.007374485,0.15918113,0.009461615,0.00010418749,0.00019814521,0.000037615246,0.09659152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12028446,0.70122564,0.0075960965,0.068621695,0.039044306,0.00043769475,0.0001635269,0.00011484813,0.06251177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987618,0.00070061575,0.000052720756,0.00012684605,0.00014820884,0.00020983822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824417,0.0013850525,0.00009969938,0.0000339522,0.00012277463,0.00011426645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020581754,0.0013522266,0.0010661513,0.0031854482,0.00478665,0.0068053235,0.0015328935,0.007402625,0.008376793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002146656,0.0004932353,0.0009521123,0.0038762505,0.011356504,0.008875566,0.003839825,0.006003203,0.000800246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000522141,0.00015123068,0.0011365851,0.0010123817,0.000017139826,0.00032935577,0.009507549,0.00070649583,0.000362281,0.8973266,0.045569997,0.043828156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011975108,0.00009177445,0.0015198688,0.001757037,0.000011921779,0.00024330254,0.0070763296,0.00032896266,0.00013290496,0.19269548,0.79609746,0.0000330649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01089436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01622133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01089436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005781411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036327785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041947305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037896601","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2012.08.012","title":"On the expenditure-dependence of children’s resource shares","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics Letters","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Engel curve; Resource (disambiguation); Identification (biology); Shadow (psychology); Shadow price; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Member states; Econometrics; Resource allocation; Public economics; Microeconomics; Aggregate expenditure; International trade; Computer science; Mathematics; European union","score_opus":0.016858228066500953,"score_gpt":0.2338126190372705,"score_spread":0.21695439097076955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037896601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9635198,0.00048806844,0.0027514782,0.0029680121,0.000007938295,0.000010227978,0.0007287619,0.000015681755,0.02950994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950724,0.00021861683,0.00020095376,0.000095383,0.000013924088,0.000007487851,0.00014579417,0.000012049788,0.0042333305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950683,0.00016466039,0.000021161279,0.00006831167,0.00005045226,0.00018853704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782503,0.017977033,0.0017785875,0.0007460742,0.0005353362,0.0007125349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016958906,0.00022664455,0.00050327106,0.0006060988,0.00045121342,0.0012275641,0.0008134065,0.00097533874,0.029337998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106068915,0.0003703181,0.00056230807,0.0008900253,0.0014716997,0.0018470522,0.001123205,0.0013916721,0.00077256514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013203066,0.00027406547,0.40023196,0.00019846363,0.00027539773,0.0013667597,0.0032244748,0.04653093,0.0040928093,0.5041305,0.006687355,0.031667016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001308735,0.0002063206,0.74700594,0.00017871575,0.00022391963,0.00092040485,0.0053117014,0.058615968,0.0026114562,0.17387788,0.010832379,0.000084439474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019109199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02155388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029337998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001594293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007567144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098145366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038664329","doi":"10.1111/j.1752-1726.2008.01321.x","title":"Alleinerziehende Mütter, <i>Workfare</i> und prekäre Beschäftigungsverhältnisse: Zeit für ein kanadisches Grundeinkommen?","year":2009,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Internationale Revue für Soziale Sicherheit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Workfare; Political science; Humanities; Art; Law","score_opus":0.02962049812035069,"score_gpt":0.3168309423489925,"score_spread":0.28721044422864184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038664329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9373028,0.008049654,0.0011958709,0.016582612,0.000098334196,0.000028656865,0.00019923417,0.00001951446,0.036523342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99534047,0.0014561567,0.00021642093,0.00019141295,0.00002007193,0.00001790189,0.00003116662,0.000006048543,0.002720424],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868363,0.0005003131,0.000053694737,0.00015917845,0.00020061893,0.00040259343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944119,0.0019860656,0.0019754947,0.00022776294,0.0005099072,0.00088887854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024413536,0.00022204196,0.00030502363,0.00097222475,0.0024862636,0.0040565585,0.00061485154,0.00087832613,0.011432175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006884374,0.0002566986,0.00029233057,0.001294143,0.0036826285,0.002584914,0.0022642121,0.0010605544,0.0004898606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003881544,0.00029261762,0.44341466,0.0009005254,0.00014865969,0.0008490399,0.30207646,0.000604049,0.0023144493,0.093537815,0.0063930666,0.14908051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016381084,0.00016070351,0.65127313,0.00061045436,0.00006914026,0.00029898845,0.26826292,0.0002056892,0.0006062048,0.017417675,0.0610153,0.000063309715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043701064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07280947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95629895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005265141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005804571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08689338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039370491","doi":"10.7202/050584ar","title":"Gender Based Differences in Promotions of Clerical Workers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constant (computer programming); Psychology; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Business; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.06343790477262626,"score_gpt":0.2895654842426257,"score_spread":0.22612757946999942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039370491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99636286,0.00031440737,0.000043505574,0.00015716028,0.000018035387,0.0000048345423,0.00003809039,0.000001692807,0.003059453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841714,0.000104761995,0.000027724507,0.00002810125,0.000013837416,0.0000023381838,0.000018631647,9.699052e-7,0.0013865442],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994992,0.00015464723,0.000019247214,0.000053974232,0.00011166274,0.00016119462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996062,0.0013140845,0.001196947,0.00009087271,0.00020519104,0.0011309179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011502983,0.00010513943,0.0001838063,0.00066258374,0.00051169813,0.00066711067,0.00014896471,0.0003126209,0.0064474363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045771003,0.00010338951,0.000108848326,0.000266974,0.00033175873,0.0002653788,0.00028116824,0.00039921326,0.0007467143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000777181,0.0004722926,0.9681815,0.000046611207,0.000029138297,0.0003730216,0.005724207,0.00008805299,0.004447613,0.0009465348,0.0005992288,0.018314565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007877209,0.00024464115,0.9941906,0.000018308425,0.0000073335564,0.00021022276,0.0034671016,0.000052106432,0.00026458246,0.00018138623,0.0013505189,0.000005436739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021003026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00478753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064474363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023277359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035405136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021568835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W204069431","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511615863.015","title":"Married Households and Gross Household Product","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Production (economics); Gross domestic product; National accounts; Product (mathematics); Gross value added; Capital (architecture); Labour economics; Value (mathematics); Demographic economics; Agricultural economics; Geography; Economic growth; Economy; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.03659023010938842,"score_gpt":0.2156672399031444,"score_spread":0.179077009793756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W204069431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4555956,0.11833148,0.0035535218,0.013793209,0.0006829854,0.00003599475,0.0019990755,0.000052708463,0.4059554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9376784,0.029213382,0.00047734307,0.00040703162,0.00017336944,0.000012214494,0.00029215627,0.000008377791,0.031737648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998093,0.00007296554,0.0000067439537,0.0000289072,0.000041338484,0.00004070943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996088,0.0001592729,0.00010054848,0.000019904814,0.000040550207,0.00007096268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003583097,0.00014647779,0.00017703863,0.0006836046,0.00047185304,0.0011801854,0.00021893483,0.0003221572,0.01067454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017571343,0.00008991319,0.00008784143,0.0015474601,0.0007973269,0.0009912688,0.0006566046,0.0005088841,0.000815849],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077529185,0.00013328633,0.1374032,0.00018799362,0.00004770084,0.00073265453,0.006067624,0.0027951687,0.00013851025,0.6109352,0.045667328,0.19581375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013390801,0.00013010752,0.2825593,0.00053831004,0.0000414242,0.00088936184,0.00785136,0.0036011888,0.00018752714,0.41702503,0.28712377,0.000039211005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010795938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010653717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010795938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008508555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046565715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035709858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041864533","doi":"10.1300/j070v10n02_02","title":"Incest and Women of Color: A Study of Experiences and Disclosure","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Sexual Abuse","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Christian Studies; University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Women of color; Psychology; Self-disclosure; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Sexual abuse; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Injury prevention; Developmental psychology; Medical emergency; Medicine; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.020689168596940036,"score_gpt":0.2699315475940406,"score_spread":0.24924237899710056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041864533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953708,0.001154284,0.00010831903,0.0013998101,0.000037285197,0.00002551817,0.000026717526,0.0000048864927,0.0018724251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99563205,0.0018076554,0.00014675022,0.0008912976,0.00004264159,0.00004466768,0.000029972622,0.0000068561017,0.001398098],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688405,0.0019988625,0.00009913793,0.00010766525,0.00025088392,0.0006593699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939505,0.0031373645,0.0012974266,0.0002191132,0.00040747333,0.0009881099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031187271,0.00052190485,0.00068027875,0.0009580613,0.009086407,0.0032712964,0.00069088873,0.0016315146,0.0019404101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0129454415,0.0007045175,0.00033487985,0.0012834393,0.0045446707,0.0028384132,0.005332802,0.0034701447,0.00021714882],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009858224,0.000113658825,0.023130773,0.00006156729,0.00001271651,0.0015123152,0.9668537,0.000011647113,0.00047208948,0.00046579522,0.00050167757,0.006765376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000080134705,0.00022689834,0.014467777,0.000059274473,0.000010441873,0.0025468776,0.9762222,0.00002668598,0.00014347372,0.00011938483,0.0061539407,0.0000151014965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008843124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01559436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009086407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001630493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002317266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01758331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042111883","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.02.002","title":"A theory of rational marriage and divorce","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Economics; Incentive; Marriage market; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03942028608249056,"score_gpt":0.26546214114430555,"score_spread":0.22604185506181498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042111883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081407726,0.20693515,0.20949708,0.09787895,0.0019380916,0.0001403305,0.0007677036,0.00010548673,0.4013295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8727074,0.0883006,0.010363498,0.0034000243,0.0015487483,0.00014550857,0.0003199051,0.000031267766,0.023182957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850094,0.00089985307,0.000047132246,0.00013122291,0.00024342824,0.00017748278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976363,0.0017197576,0.00016002606,0.00016390238,0.00022158383,0.0000983397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030670858,0.00045795937,0.001029107,0.0012928249,0.0015621656,0.0023151515,0.0018931446,0.0029774636,0.01249487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058635734,0.00031100668,0.0008255018,0.0026019672,0.0077669793,0.0046763704,0.0013070282,0.002117877,0.00095161446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009840444,0.000011355201,0.00029870804,0.00004384236,0.000008105429,0.000025570023,0.00016370503,0.0010164053,0.0000069885355,0.99030006,0.0018964572,0.006218872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016689133,0.0000073786455,0.00050657196,0.00007145053,0.00000987417,0.000057416168,0.00028288167,0.0018064542,0.000010054681,0.98203665,0.015189726,0.000004909845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011774214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061125406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01249487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029850064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038792342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041799486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042658968","doi":"10.13085/eijtur.2.1.67-87","title":"Methodological issues in the estimation of parental time – Analysis of measures in a Canadian time-use survey","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"electronic International Journal of Time Use Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Time-use survey; Estimation; Statistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Space time; Engineering","score_opus":0.17423797631994054,"score_gpt":0.4662127222308214,"score_spread":0.29197474591088085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042658968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59259474,0.00459325,0.32511127,0.0035866085,0.0006174436,0.007349231,0.018999092,0.00049686234,0.0466515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8241858,0.0009901142,0.1533963,0.0007964909,0.00009148256,0.0067972178,0.005311588,0.00012977382,0.008301272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9485444,0.031033365,0.002853764,0.0032073236,0.011079785,0.003281345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9487077,0.023613319,0.00570131,0.0071718004,0.013811724,0.0009941142],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.058217198,0.0011076723,0.0013470311,0.005901158,0.0059560076,0.003994279,0.0069541372,0.0010600187,0.0030659446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14414668,0.0009038747,0.0020307088,0.018731344,0.003749109,0.0013037571,0.0033035355,0.0020530967,0.00048195902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008274094,0.00043590748,0.6586984,0.0015203089,0.0013347032,0.0004864861,0.02973309,0.031853054,0.0017294331,0.10339593,0.017994495,0.15199089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012114908,0.00032498423,0.88019824,0.0007731872,0.00027920931,0.00014140304,0.015798045,0.03473297,0.0033661348,0.013444022,0.050571058,0.00024965132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96551114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9471838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94178283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024039831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029488195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30788565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042927130","doi":"10.1007/s11150-011-9129-2","title":"Time with sons and daughters","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Consumption (sociology); Quality (philosophy); Economics; Wage; Raising (metalworking); Girl; Time allocation; Demographic economics; Psychology; Labour economics; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04811698425667615,"score_gpt":0.2347307916467698,"score_spread":0.18661380739009364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042927130","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010979742,0.93533915,0.0007729834,0.019661512,0.0014655741,0.0000069413923,0.00015969726,0.000003778994,0.031610552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08936008,0.89038205,0.00037342714,0.0021881536,0.0035628593,0.000021490949,0.00010075752,0.000011245852,0.013999994],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993344,0.0003297009,0.000030300893,0.00009203647,0.00014238515,0.00007117733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807286,0.0013669241,0.0002072736,0.000059475115,0.00015282845,0.00014069014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010006079,0.00031925595,0.0006815864,0.0009328493,0.00064508273,0.0018709056,0.00064411917,0.0011258706,0.008117864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052062776,0.00019724086,0.000246479,0.0022852207,0.0020528282,0.002587381,0.0009727474,0.0011151636,0.00068027485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000227512,0.00014239686,0.009251796,0.0021317215,0.00011561348,0.00056517427,0.0016323105,0.0012378152,0.00021669199,0.34024042,0.06399181,0.58024675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025797863,0.000090384085,0.023135437,0.004593871,0.00006683281,0.0012547583,0.0048394557,0.00033808372,0.00017854421,0.1383778,0.82706845,0.000030529674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005490037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010371592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008117864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001915817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016111057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027156949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044236220","doi":"10.3138/cpp.39.3.473","title":"Pourquoi les femmes gagnent-elles moins que les hommes ?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Workforce; Wage; Gender gap; Demographic economics; Political science; Welfare economics; Sociology; Economics; Labour economics; Demography; Economic growth; Census; Population","score_opus":0.04639787262541829,"score_gpt":0.28843146173269946,"score_spread":0.24203358910728118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044236220","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1950544,0.12179351,0.0017623743,0.5052467,0.004021483,0.00004980386,0.0023449599,0.00006723794,0.1696596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81935734,0.07836912,0.0024597459,0.037171803,0.0010703669,0.00006042396,0.0005724895,0.000048364436,0.060890354],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983164,0.00042293002,0.000028931994,0.00015964918,0.0003711332,0.000700935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987656,0.00037282557,0.0001411699,0.000044280907,0.00047090772,0.00020523768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002129197,0.0002931204,0.00050894544,0.0010653635,0.005911032,0.0042279703,0.0006528324,0.001605336,0.01118672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064599724,0.0001868775,0.00032396943,0.0020115844,0.0041306634,0.0044628493,0.00085317576,0.0023792076,0.000996743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015016533,0.00006850383,0.08310708,0.00086034444,0.00012516846,0.0013131516,0.11062285,0.000226985,0.00071266893,0.30539617,0.16797687,0.3294401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016053797,0.000041849307,0.1041137,0.0023542102,0.000057718848,0.00069078663,0.23456194,0.0001233918,0.00031426732,0.021152046,0.6364958,0.00007817273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8438084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9065539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15619159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011777387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017900614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3142228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W204497578","doi":"10.7202/600929ar","title":"Équité et efficacité des programmes actuels de sécurité du revenu","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Poverty; Welfare economics; Public economics; Social security; Welfare; Economics; Social Welfare; Work (physics); Political science; Economic growth; Engineering","score_opus":0.03628301855770872,"score_gpt":0.29821635149807885,"score_spread":0.26193333294037013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W204497578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76530635,0.006661504,0.047291376,0.0025408743,0.00016520069,0.0005879077,0.0014029269,0.00030272777,0.17574106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622722,0.0031802135,0.013760611,0.00011000312,0.00012026347,0.00034964722,0.0005751452,0.00006409911,0.019567845],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98482764,0.0096049635,0.00027590417,0.00067558634,0.0034564447,0.001159559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816616,0.013360733,0.0013318694,0.001010117,0.0020507667,0.0005849421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014878249,0.0007655268,0.00063900533,0.0024886099,0.0006039528,0.002320877,0.0007500552,0.0010246392,0.011069149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037525866,0.00023739343,0.00081616547,0.0014319243,0.0011443011,0.0019100469,0.0009730879,0.0011878285,0.00069157575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026563883,0.0015355488,0.071625575,0.00065192895,0.000495673,0.00021020233,0.0011876439,0.20098779,0.0037065905,0.14825971,0.0032985844,0.56538445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010436269,0.007853506,0.45903325,0.001417365,0.000669528,0.00081388664,0.0027123098,0.32799965,0.015359356,0.063229986,0.11970961,0.00015794947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043858554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032273088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043858554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008306276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004765038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08720654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045437075","doi":"10.2307/3552626","title":"Food Prices and the Timing of Welfare Payments: A Canadian Study","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Welfare; Economics; Business; Agricultural economics; Monetary economics; Public economics; Finance; Market economy","score_opus":0.027290131324128053,"score_gpt":0.27789434417105413,"score_spread":0.2506042128469261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045437075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877707,0.0005197506,0.00013919677,0.0008782175,0.00001312432,0.000038296308,0.0018632255,0.000009190921,0.008768501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995518,0.00045827177,0.0002564891,0.00011794814,0.000007863573,0.000014683945,0.0005865565,0.000008773143,0.0030314103],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989874,0.000098065015,0.00002447787,0.000149125,0.00030666913,0.0004342437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972458,0.00028334477,0.00055799424,0.000093225695,0.0011866976,0.0006329712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082094263,0.0003485785,0.00038482348,0.0019360405,0.005710056,0.0018761068,0.001307614,0.000617018,0.005288631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036620274,0.0003911218,0.0005899286,0.0062449006,0.0012371418,0.00081260933,0.0009441345,0.0010423056,0.00029889765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028988806,0.00027648415,0.9573062,0.000074637945,0.00010224346,0.00035829205,0.011356728,0.00054741045,0.0009019525,0.0037873185,0.0048405747,0.020158196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013840617,0.000041623007,0.98827374,0.000022660271,0.00002622543,0.000050200277,0.0061854934,0.00040951706,0.00010076194,0.00010783427,0.0047358503,0.000032275922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99880505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050223347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050223347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035513237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36439764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047376069","doi":"10.1080/08873631.2010.519464","title":"The Awkward Spaces of Fathering","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cultural Geography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"King's University College","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Media studies; Sociology; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013347622173392018,"score_gpt":0.2773364039242549,"score_spread":0.2639887817508629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047376069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024245126,0.4082579,0.0033852477,0.13469633,0.008144442,0.000027978542,0.00014416143,0.00014112415,0.4209577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5610793,0.1769094,0.0032757923,0.019887405,0.0032176957,0.000064277025,0.000115608644,0.00025013345,0.2352004],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986576,0.00088345323,0.000023707345,0.00011257327,0.00016566765,0.00015699133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992143,0.00028859748,0.00010106426,0.00006960381,0.00008079144,0.00024573645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013122807,0.0006204034,0.00027926711,0.0004671374,0.004951821,0.006244951,0.00051755505,0.0011937818,0.007206484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031639887,0.00035100046,0.00020134983,0.0005725109,0.012808191,0.006862286,0.004053181,0.0027935903,0.0018178377],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064610475,0.000041572963,0.0012700434,0.00027930964,0.000013611523,0.0005239629,0.1227666,0.000119159035,0.0004504604,0.3577339,0.3938821,0.12285463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003118288,0.000015785236,0.0010566266,0.00037198275,0.0000029881658,0.00040366562,0.031060396,0.000025176862,0.00012725467,0.037955757,0.92896736,0.000010014605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006790946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015128732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007206484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016500384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025444867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024108052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047741303","doi":"10.1007/s00148-007-0147-6","title":"Parental time and working schedules","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Evening; Time allocation; Working hours; Working time; Social policy; Leisure time; Paid work; Time-use survey; Time budget; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Psychology; Economics; Labour economics; Demography; Medicine; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Physical activity","score_opus":0.024690886642814373,"score_gpt":0.2797678610169736,"score_spread":0.2550769743741592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047741303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99319214,0.00059487496,0.0001968954,0.0003471222,0.00002329447,0.0000052272862,0.00024605938,0.0000027000099,0.005391717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977837,0.00022505329,0.000069274196,0.000020247206,0.000014171296,0.0000038185344,0.000120120596,0.0000034288785,0.0017602347],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965584,0.00016111706,0.000018342249,0.000040343813,0.000042610827,0.00008162648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99241334,0.0037758679,0.0014684151,0.00046275338,0.00036615203,0.0015134999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010910326,0.00016914072,0.000229274,0.0007842862,0.0005628239,0.0010560076,0.00043435756,0.00047947455,0.011603737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00867606,0.00022933763,0.0002948233,0.0008332212,0.0003989348,0.00062167575,0.00045444624,0.0004740639,0.00061608606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040977544,0.0002493814,0.9771796,0.0000115707035,0.00006333173,0.00033593408,0.0021070591,0.000352972,0.00026877958,0.0032232993,0.00065441756,0.015143861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017337012,0.0000917232,0.9935935,0.000023230481,0.0000423733,0.00023111189,0.0025068724,0.000350302,0.00008942788,0.0014779902,0.0015683462,0.000007778283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009338215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013655211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011603737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003898331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045189846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03881836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047913789","doi":"10.1086/506486","title":"The Relationship between Women's Education and Marriage Outcomes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Census; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Marital status; Demographic economics; Distribution (mathematics); Marriage market; Consumption (sociology); Labour economics; Demography; Sociology; Population; Geography","score_opus":0.021227228653203773,"score_gpt":0.28479919157280353,"score_spread":0.2635719629195998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047913789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957569,0.00034901703,0.00017720465,0.00026450545,0.000008698236,0.000008209809,0.00093475095,0.0000043503023,0.0024963138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860173,0.00018441581,0.00006200304,0.000022565993,0.0000087609205,0.0000056884683,0.0004900629,0.0000011605929,0.0006235352],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995751,0.00012626583,0.000032940297,0.00005275896,0.000091336566,0.00012162592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99523157,0.0014361151,0.002327563,0.000106082254,0.0002814418,0.0006171673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078302785,0.00015585183,0.00021730519,0.0012629511,0.00038431847,0.00058268476,0.0003050181,0.0002691787,0.0056622787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067219352,0.00012171063,0.0002734092,0.0015328475,0.0003706351,0.0004334515,0.00075517135,0.0006061046,0.0004329754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002964048,0.000052625233,0.9959182,0.000007164929,0.000033903183,0.00005125432,0.00014463074,0.00021899115,0.000032655687,0.00044410228,0.0001867195,0.0028800878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003975028,0.000049561655,0.99809676,0.000008578285,0.000014535347,0.00006365985,0.0002305384,0.00053273764,0.000055307737,0.0003713979,0.000568969,0.00000395306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014941153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02144502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014941153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004528217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038045898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029708385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048498774","doi":"10.7202/601506ar","title":"Récents développements dans l’analyse de l’offre de travail","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04284187012587115,"score_gpt":0.2909350987557054,"score_spread":0.24809322862983424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048498774","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09235955,0.21247554,0.4120471,0.021815162,0.0014810708,0.00024333518,0.00079845864,0.00029589978,0.258484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6046705,0.21091323,0.13315916,0.002826245,0.0028208746,0.00034099087,0.0012693306,0.00044864105,0.043551084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99414414,0.0022484139,0.00036795554,0.0010867544,0.0018566024,0.0002961844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96906227,0.023241017,0.0018900363,0.0026827322,0.002562431,0.00056159374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006682724,0.0018292633,0.00165813,0.004077197,0.0015129959,0.009985959,0.0030086164,0.003399435,0.017177595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017874645,0.0015440916,0.0033032435,0.007330964,0.005801506,0.011436595,0.0034783513,0.0052468022,0.0027538626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010365469,0.00019073709,0.008616032,0.0028478156,0.00035324547,0.00031236894,0.0052274475,0.017335495,0.0010877738,0.8105825,0.002918041,0.15042488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003955151,0.00022539876,0.02001954,0.0032332516,0.00034587752,0.0007933791,0.00601068,0.056469258,0.0018656282,0.65232193,0.2584444,0.00023107183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015951913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0141751915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017177595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006296086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004974383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05746472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049070257","doi":"10.1353/cpp.0.0027","title":"An Analysis of Effective Marginal Tax Rates in Quebec","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Microsimulation; Redistribution (election); Demographic economics; Population; Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Distribution (mathematics); Income tax; Public economics; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.012314174744044941,"score_gpt":0.29054017168546864,"score_spread":0.2782259969414237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049070257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9784323,0.0005750323,0.0019137689,0.0006555387,0.000014104901,0.000035139175,0.002748056,0.000051336112,0.015574649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994121,0.00014309306,0.00036662613,0.000028368993,0.0000025062554,0.000008440676,0.00068720896,0.000008996404,0.004633791],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960333,0.000090565096,0.000012175417,0.00005055405,0.00009623033,0.00014713757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983425,0.00040686707,0.00019109629,0.000090809815,0.00083226815,0.00013638474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008818271,0.00018340872,0.00029980863,0.0009204881,0.0006643517,0.0014055349,0.0007419547,0.00038246013,0.007330238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003797925,0.00017423024,0.00030069432,0.0013801287,0.00040927337,0.0004126321,0.00024328851,0.0005488989,0.00025646988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037213697,0.00011211118,0.5032947,0.000116447394,0.00036461375,0.00049890456,0.0011580435,0.36163518,0.0013066245,0.07845855,0.0100636855,0.04261898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003313985,0.000070001675,0.6495527,0.000069491965,0.00010725194,0.000082970255,0.0017067413,0.32798806,0.00068368315,0.0031602387,0.016483756,0.00006200923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95995885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9542833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04004115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023639921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058728056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17152041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051170174","doi":"10.1177/1091142111430682","title":"Sweet and Not-So-Sweet Charity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Public economics; Earnings; Order (exchange); Welfare; Government (linguistics); Private good; Social Welfare; Public good; Microeconomics; Finance; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.05702669095331902,"score_gpt":0.3155892491066585,"score_spread":0.25856255815333945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051170174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118616074,0.0096414555,0.04355366,0.05558365,0.000996898,0.000107777785,0.00026401845,0.00015270326,0.7710838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8771451,0.004554278,0.008953361,0.0074297073,0.00029997024,0.000096239564,0.00008783671,0.000044642846,0.10138881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966709,0.0015310388,0.00009517366,0.0003342298,0.00079288287,0.00057590834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982559,0.00035008002,0.0003427601,0.00033164147,0.00039746685,0.00032215362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037425498,0.00029637953,0.0004672708,0.0008048916,0.0022855808,0.0031405063,0.00049048464,0.0019513562,0.005574414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005388995,0.00020679698,0.0004112925,0.0009615019,0.0045284536,0.002629402,0.0031282802,0.0017037109,0.0011619566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027812657,0.000040252206,0.0015600238,0.00009563797,0.000019221312,0.000054489705,0.00042830544,0.00058403425,0.00032539075,0.9639683,0.009094485,0.023802204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028702774,0.00013454806,0.00997024,0.00044753563,0.0000305647,0.00077189365,0.002171359,0.0014984569,0.0007503622,0.6861317,0.29803398,0.000030725998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017428194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056954366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005574414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014821542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026195128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019792736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051243658","doi":"10.3406/oss.2010.1416","title":"L’action publique et la fécondité – Aperçu d’une étude empirique du processus qui régit la première naissance au Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Santé Société et Solidarité","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Fertility; Demographic economics; Wage; Residence; Economics; Family income; Welfare economics; Demography; Sociology; Labour economics; Population; Economic growth","score_opus":0.01547859754575933,"score_gpt":0.32225701636425064,"score_spread":0.3067784188184913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051243658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4333443,0.11470913,0.018749364,0.16229708,0.0017173701,0.00037834534,0.0040078308,0.00040312827,0.2643934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94742733,0.022320447,0.0045779953,0.0028548334,0.00031509876,0.00007697726,0.00036893977,0.0001199187,0.021938365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.990324,0.0030398427,0.00031377363,0.00096659217,0.003456367,0.0018994679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.961082,0.01802986,0.0028862096,0.001879344,0.014522237,0.0016003853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0150362365,0.0006690571,0.0013707274,0.0048327367,0.008019888,0.008720254,0.0026216204,0.0020359356,0.008344434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038797062,0.00063139596,0.0011770137,0.0059021683,0.009714461,0.004072001,0.002291788,0.0031627542,0.00043658193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002973079,0.00024204524,0.15166767,0.0014177485,0.00054179045,0.00064173504,0.021753699,0.009606854,0.00055466907,0.58632666,0.02238205,0.20456775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017047563,0.00019638342,0.35094777,0.0040604738,0.0005580584,0.00032321413,0.026901618,0.019710476,0.0014785938,0.054550305,0.5407415,0.0003611293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9902158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98368984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12388497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12388497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18814164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8988526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051322641","doi":"10.1046/j.0013-0133.2003.00168.x","title":"Asking Consumption Questions in General Purpose Surveys","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Banca d'Italia; Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Research Foundation; York University","keywords":"Recall; Consumption (sociology); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03848147131220102,"score_gpt":0.30033695623340084,"score_spread":0.2618554849211998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051322641","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18109983,0.0064388043,0.7072184,0.004274896,0.00089925923,0.01626378,0.017620223,0.002366367,0.06381844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44381416,0.0052420935,0.4880902,0.0045623607,0.00081048365,0.034661446,0.013983158,0.00021797266,0.008618101],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7802634,0.19536671,0.009598061,0.0050863763,0.008510867,0.0011745909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6368386,0.2920815,0.02546067,0.031405397,0.013418161,0.0007955366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11263882,0.0014483174,0.0016205288,0.0045074066,0.0012006761,0.0033341488,0.001788552,0.0042044474,0.0076807067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2906315,0.0015430754,0.0012055356,0.010282481,0.0018905335,0.0039934674,0.0024596527,0.0018818983,0.0030941998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001613471,0.0013540272,0.22183773,0.009769741,0.0010700129,0.00041903026,0.023886403,0.009242531,0.0039785667,0.059022453,0.046297364,0.62150866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077568233,0.0028983573,0.3709197,0.0058749947,0.0009630333,0.0013453923,0.017289884,0.02997472,0.012408763,0.22875404,0.3282001,0.0005953023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031087645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030234638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11263882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016578994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012811482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5956981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051992571","doi":"10.1023/b:eujp.0000014572.66520.0d","title":"Diffusion Effects in the European Fertility Transition: Historical Evidence from Within a Belgian Town (1846–1910)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flemish; Fertility; Demographic economics; Neighbourhood (mathematics); German; Demography; Quarter (Canadian coin); Working class; Upper class; Geography; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Population; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.028181177468855928,"score_gpt":0.25680076770543137,"score_spread":0.22861959023657544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051992571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951277,0.0020907938,0.0001261781,0.00023467702,0.000006817007,0.0000041513854,0.00028495805,0.0000032952348,0.0021214196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868435,0.0004706232,0.00007975306,0.000013347,0.0000061924993,0.0000016628036,0.00012295136,0.000002795155,0.00061821996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936146,0.00022689428,0.000025712414,0.00013700928,0.00007988221,0.00016902744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814737,0.0006731299,0.00050874444,0.00009654981,0.00032197914,0.000252211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014941328,0.00015360267,0.000366853,0.002144757,0.00090617104,0.0013104859,0.00052987755,0.0004394333,0.0032681157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002829482,0.0001481478,0.00024728593,0.0031280632,0.0016085482,0.00084486377,0.0009780485,0.0005002901,0.00015897192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006760132,0.00016580638,0.89504224,0.0001997887,0.00024332224,0.00058900693,0.035350062,0.0013644957,0.001226455,0.011984253,0.0017899425,0.051368546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006075185,0.00002812139,0.9908895,0.000033128304,0.000028200564,0.000092030525,0.0046883766,0.00016948667,0.0001156555,0.00013014502,0.0038101056,0.000009236275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2607503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3018839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2607503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028833093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001035287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5184651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053097067","doi":"10.5539/ass.v10n3p221","title":"Married Women Labor Supply Decision in Malaysia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia","keywords":"Educational attainment; Wage; Labour economics; Economics; Secondary labor market; Demographic economics; Labor relations; Economic growth","score_opus":0.009577643475025861,"score_gpt":0.2798904206684742,"score_spread":0.2703127771934483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053097067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99872535,0.00009309817,0.000022673654,0.000108608656,0.00000272146,0.0000035538292,0.000037812806,3.5443367e-7,0.0010058362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828523,0.00013273218,0.00001920557,0.000025425587,0.0000029105395,0.0000031279985,0.00002982784,4.4456485e-7,0.0015011115],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997328,0.000074449854,0.00001877894,0.000030137086,0.00003921552,0.00010459327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960536,0.000067910325,0.00012798588,0.000009268844,0.00002731799,0.00016222533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042500207,0.0001227901,0.00014614742,0.0004674439,0.0007499062,0.0007287682,0.00014110075,0.00022662488,0.005641534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097322377,0.00016710738,0.00014014737,0.0004955799,0.00025116093,0.00038637526,0.0005168841,0.00026165144,0.00037462058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009847821,0.00013660785,0.9789869,0.000022732935,0.00001592811,0.00043035363,0.0072155776,0.000115601375,0.00036742107,0.00074648653,0.00040663214,0.011457183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008039938,0.000173003,0.9379284,0.000056324203,0.000012763822,0.00030071518,0.05722035,0.0006478673,0.00016804399,0.0003304279,0.0031444042,0.000009691175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016556865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036490705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016556865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005930614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076290546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032920957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053703207","doi":"10.13085/eijtur.6.2.200-239","title":"Timing and fragmentation of daily working hours arrangements and income inequality – An earnings treatment effects approach with German time use diary data","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"electronic International Journal of Time Use Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; German; Inequality; Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Fragmentation (computing); Economic inequality; Computer science; Mathematics; Geography; Finance","score_opus":0.08112503919154973,"score_gpt":0.39883437852308884,"score_spread":0.3177093393315391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053703207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94646686,0.0006981753,0.039672613,0.00077230093,0.0003460665,0.0016303095,0.0037624585,0.00016043078,0.006490854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98140705,0.00014895057,0.006542869,0.00015963172,0.000114036,0.0026560805,0.001925368,0.000050144004,0.006995789],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97012657,0.023097329,0.00085633405,0.0026039255,0.0012881327,0.002027682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736752,0.018327871,0.0032656884,0.003497008,0.0007452095,0.0004891531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016852079,0.001210548,0.0018182071,0.0018909727,0.002263817,0.0022940964,0.0034406486,0.0025769975,0.019818729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027217235,0.0010610628,0.0038074793,0.0028696395,0.0038114062,0.001911078,0.0027610825,0.0033715088,0.00078647566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.058234446,0.01736643,0.6002357,0.0015477025,0.01914095,0.003063392,0.02017073,0.045887098,0.0063393284,0.09251829,0.018067248,0.117428645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061931135,0.012986109,0.7893296,0.000395306,0.015359547,0.00042681996,0.014878275,0.10053309,0.006079708,0.026776843,0.026505224,0.0005364226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02218503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012499695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02218503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016434556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015287341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08912337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054178808","doi":"","title":"Individual vs. Parental Consent in Marriage: Implications for Intra-Household Resource Allocation and Growth","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Incentive; Informed consent; Resource allocation; Economics; Demographic economics; Time allocation; Psychology; Economic growth; Microeconomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.019601784731780137,"score_gpt":0.26942522731225077,"score_spread":0.24982344258047062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054178808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87049484,0.0013993887,0.040566538,0.01215632,0.0000752839,0.00010371873,0.00027299573,0.000031011812,0.07489995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949279,0.0003286988,0.001148754,0.00011899552,0.000019947536,0.000022517115,0.000020196494,0.0000034200134,0.003409703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862146,0.0007668233,0.000047624497,0.00014291989,0.00011183441,0.00030942526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99589926,0.0022684268,0.0008262378,0.00032587975,0.00018807614,0.0004920342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027883707,0.0002454233,0.0003914038,0.00035092587,0.0010501136,0.0021620411,0.00056764914,0.0012297472,0.00793018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008590682,0.00015942367,0.00041623786,0.0007282308,0.0038091217,0.0023401836,0.0020781297,0.00097082846,0.0002922598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019398612,0.00016328992,0.04197697,0.00005370304,0.000024166138,0.000640681,0.003710478,0.013562021,0.0007853629,0.90994084,0.00078965805,0.028158879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007313741,0.00019464918,0.044474453,0.000107098465,0.000038090817,0.0005276249,0.0074337847,0.03344069,0.0006250973,0.9026909,0.010348966,0.00004554963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048270887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005014629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00793018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019516606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014830669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026529133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055258866","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00810.x","title":"Women and Work in the New Global Political Economy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Studies Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Sociology; Gender studies; Empowerment; Politics; Feminism; Human rights; Transnationalism; Political economy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07036384176942918,"score_gpt":0.36539817847174627,"score_spread":0.2950343367023171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055258866","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02219134,0.4058365,0.00224036,0.16667065,0.0050989045,0.00007052941,0.00014887283,0.00008795946,0.39765483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3692587,0.29937014,0.004009272,0.027455967,0.006345771,0.00034070638,0.00019840861,0.00027630635,0.29274464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991097,0.00050523854,0.000024318797,0.000069348534,0.00017486939,0.00011662507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937516,0.00039436828,0.0000712858,0.00003226688,0.000039219256,0.00008778009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001398525,0.0005743678,0.00036549472,0.0010737026,0.004108708,0.010072456,0.00055760733,0.0016655194,0.004214723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013282867,0.0002920924,0.0002084774,0.002336934,0.009761616,0.006367196,0.0033409393,0.002759703,0.0006433247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014220489,0.00003121333,0.0012636031,0.0002573708,0.000008421578,0.00016621196,0.10337377,0.00022662446,0.00024894992,0.6422727,0.17723575,0.07490105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025351,0.000010538497,0.0015082145,0.0005404582,0.0000022028441,0.00007985138,0.021533387,0.000040240153,0.00004976199,0.053345338,0.92288,0.0000074879727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055894163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012289976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010072456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003438733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041039553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024949849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055449421","doi":"10.1353/dem.2003.0024","title":"How an earnings supplement can affect union formation among low-income single mothers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Earnings; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Welfare; Marital status; Economics; Welfare reform; Demography; Labour economics; Population; Psychology; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.01196285132157883,"score_gpt":0.2403952843843287,"score_spread":0.22843243306274985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055449421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995202,0.00004602817,0.000021887947,0.000045539156,0.0000030077433,0.000007759066,0.000039617924,0.000001327588,0.00031469637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987919,0.00010610668,0.00014993467,0.000033281067,0.0000013002805,0.000011268739,0.00003924117,8.373205e-7,0.0008662257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962604,0.00013262431,0.000010869183,0.00004353411,0.00007193254,0.00011496223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990932,0.00034821028,0.00017527671,0.000073826035,0.00013171813,0.00017772852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007429531,0.00015168622,0.00019605063,0.00021801869,0.0010701459,0.00048073923,0.0004368138,0.00026701653,0.0018471006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002892055,0.00011427037,0.0001614996,0.0001865163,0.00057318574,0.00012516971,0.0002530842,0.00024228366,0.00011378868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.033382475,0.012359521,0.72667044,0.00030563664,0.00030402,0.00095971586,0.009576541,0.0015058072,0.06124531,0.001204818,0.00209704,0.1503886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006516482,0.010161498,0.965456,0.000052941275,0.00023708447,0.0000927805,0.008216085,0.0012614448,0.009717848,0.00038686645,0.0037191408,0.00004648531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5560095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7555428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5560095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003567294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041095526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89321053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056580402","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02260.x","title":"Feature: In‐work Benefit Reform in a Cross‐National Perspective ‐ Introduction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Incentive; Work (physics); Income Support; Poverty; Public economics; Labour economics; Welfare; Cash; Economics; Welfare reform; Tax credit; Perspective (graphical); Labour supply; Earned income tax credit; Income tax; Business; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Finance; Market economy","score_opus":0.013690829295929692,"score_gpt":0.28734392162724365,"score_spread":0.27365309233131396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056580402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06289141,0.0071316105,0.0047976514,0.10624384,0.0016651185,0.00013360406,0.0007707396,0.000112302434,0.8162538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80623704,0.0042276257,0.002627646,0.022616547,0.0015822845,0.000194596,0.00043300938,0.000060118193,0.16202118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981675,0.0006888268,0.00004934411,0.0001523172,0.00042689985,0.0005150142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985648,0.00060738,0.00012071552,0.00012734205,0.00042265616,0.0001571568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024139325,0.00020250812,0.00022889656,0.00095110736,0.0016033754,0.003894484,0.0008790922,0.0032036009,0.027770571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003571578,0.00013643176,0.0003941495,0.00097550836,0.0011686789,0.0024583745,0.0019177473,0.0017218909,0.0014970995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060427752,0.00033503905,0.007836917,0.00026174003,0.0000266173,0.0003056,0.0022236744,0.0018894374,0.00054067763,0.76978457,0.15129995,0.06543539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039270264,0.00015968153,0.03864515,0.00084274105,0.0000527036,0.0002557892,0.005216495,0.0022634475,0.0012041371,0.08540832,0.86586666,0.000045618643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013319733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016319118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027770571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003967211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032399953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092901826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058320709","doi":"10.1111/1540-5982.t01-1-00002","title":"Poverty dynamics: empirical evidence for Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Humanities; Sociology; Political science; Demographic economics; Welfare economics; Demography; Geography; Economics; Art","score_opus":0.2054060436458016,"score_gpt":0.2500611445062126,"score_spread":0.044655100860410996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058320709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91151035,0.008195557,0.0006609677,0.006636496,0.000038291324,0.00009068558,0.041439652,0.00008499548,0.03134297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834937,0.003697109,0.0003954495,0.0003047402,0.000010200089,0.00002366005,0.0077875047,0.000028583703,0.004259081],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978504,0.00019177946,0.00010383702,0.00026130874,0.0008596172,0.00073305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852363,0.0022268854,0.0024210564,0.0006772452,0.007875623,0.001562804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016356013,0.0003032329,0.00062616554,0.005049262,0.003754051,0.0024105853,0.0015235114,0.00046707262,0.00808259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009043441,0.0004510874,0.00062457327,0.021275638,0.001485426,0.0009816095,0.0018730912,0.001031032,0.0004382118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023008925,0.00010456342,0.9186721,0.0003111534,0.0002444466,0.0003311527,0.0042587607,0.0023662671,0.000097241464,0.007233202,0.025283944,0.040867068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002183067,0.00002011475,0.97776175,0.00024143813,0.000075399286,0.00005725751,0.0050873873,0.0020068993,0.00008685235,0.00060913956,0.01399739,0.00003458506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051816843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051816843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062341765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37595928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058717161","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2013.06.001","title":"Examining the Influence of Price and Accessibility on Willingness to Shop at Farmers' Markets Among Low-income Eastern North Carolina Women","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; National Cancer Institute; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Residence; Market price; Business; Marketing; Agricultural economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.01796417780652033,"score_gpt":0.2940993883352926,"score_spread":0.27613521052877227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058717161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99958354,0.000014824714,0.0000072782805,0.00003567732,9.4922376e-7,0.0000027233389,0.00002245191,2.869089e-7,0.00033232177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928695,0.000025505748,0.00002523917,0.000025511583,0.0000021107683,0.000007086359,0.00003406848,6.2124445e-7,0.00059292256],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995239,0.00015503235,0.000020682555,0.000060263443,0.000076040335,0.00016408962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952923,0.0027149017,0.00077793805,0.00014181802,0.00042220377,0.0006509143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092908484,0.00026193197,0.00023602035,0.0007514105,0.0013821154,0.0012743687,0.0006786828,0.0006677057,0.0049261553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042237947,0.0002903255,0.00041732652,0.0008460799,0.0007074815,0.0005499054,0.00074378826,0.0008217812,0.00029021286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015298868,0.00037754796,0.99010265,0.000010911478,0.00004527001,0.00018571876,0.005816312,0.000052727763,0.00043705618,0.00009550032,0.00013396265,0.0025893243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004991249,0.00009689137,0.9828195,0.000009120222,0.000027666254,0.000025935766,0.016544215,0.00021043695,0.000058836446,0.00003852161,0.00015871668,0.0000051454367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17568523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.310353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17568523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001071445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014274829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34932524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059803243","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00449.x","title":"Managing Money in Marriage: Multilevel and Cross‐National Effects of the Breadwinner Role","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marriage and the Family","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Multilevel model; Power (physics); Demographic economics; Survey data collection; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.008784481474156591,"score_gpt":0.270423401909896,"score_spread":0.2616389204357394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059803243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99902606,0.00018883296,0.0001942787,0.00010949773,0.0000049323926,0.000004467717,0.00005672633,0.0000022404054,0.00041306947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995492,0.00006704404,0.0001458961,0.000015144074,0.000002473603,0.000005644052,0.00005281906,0.0000015023893,0.00016018892],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974051,0.0013740482,0.00010522546,0.00041137598,0.0002421043,0.0004621437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905392,0.003983145,0.002447292,0.0011782359,0.00036466905,0.0014875361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030059158,0.000246589,0.0007829671,0.000739382,0.001604384,0.0015998207,0.0007875275,0.00073400256,0.0048654038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011067692,0.0003887802,0.0011035369,0.0011229075,0.0012310827,0.0011072735,0.00338274,0.0017044133,0.00020939058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010757718,0.0001724331,0.9920046,0.000013664101,0.00039065178,0.0000790658,0.002579181,0.0001928816,0.00025944787,0.00045677327,0.00007468899,0.0036690605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046136456,0.00012550922,0.99537706,0.000020999054,0.00011499627,0.00004781749,0.0028504184,0.0008005068,0.0000866947,0.00034017384,0.00022140295,0.000009771075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023726547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03927538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023726547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006099531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008188756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047176898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060842004","doi":"10.2105/ajph.93.3.416","title":"A Balanced Tobacco Control Policy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Public Health","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Stephen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Tobacco control; Control (management); Environmental health; Raising (metalworking); Tobacco use; Tobacco in Alabama; Business; Public economics; Medicine; Tobacco harm reduction; Economics; Public health; Engineering","score_opus":0.029630775638781276,"score_gpt":0.3402910663138698,"score_spread":0.3106602906750885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060842004","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0663438,0.005395099,0.08580647,0.5152972,0.007094105,0.00078310736,0.00089267414,0.0006143275,0.31777322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6362264,0.0032047776,0.043859884,0.21387874,0.0031256378,0.0010170761,0.0005588402,0.00012240003,0.09800626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99180377,0.0016519201,0.0002952753,0.0014882297,0.0032682407,0.0014925492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968263,0.0005601431,0.0004564275,0.00034322919,0.0009787515,0.00083509565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008237582,0.00085857575,0.00075165584,0.0011570641,0.002160625,0.0057191434,0.0012290336,0.009876264,0.008002699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012134748,0.00055827876,0.00078202423,0.00077368715,0.0028756165,0.0066049974,0.004774212,0.0063004224,0.0018609237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017773398,0.0005423947,0.0015097738,0.00018148212,0.00006931176,0.00023635602,0.00049070624,0.0037922761,0.0032019785,0.913815,0.04200471,0.03397814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053577416,0.00048335074,0.004204237,0.00062171463,0.000087831766,0.00030395514,0.00049323245,0.009165369,0.0025296551,0.59309244,0.388404,0.000078427554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048384364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004416625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009876264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005316248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014285137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043565035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061392756","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.157","title":"Who Stands to Lose from Tax Cuts in Israel?","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.018046450697427115,"score_gpt":0.2494081363275807,"score_spread":0.23136168563015358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061392756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6820717,0.0060814526,0.0002957702,0.14083162,0.0010094241,0.00004126106,0.0010747565,0.00002135384,0.1685726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504415,0.0024935678,0.00005263663,0.01186036,0.00038456568,0.000029819925,0.00047202187,0.000015721853,0.03424976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990727,0.00015193904,0.000015247545,0.000043213186,0.00010912565,0.0006077694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992042,0.00011040021,0.00016067088,0.000017147757,0.00013722164,0.00037036772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010903816,0.00014362684,0.00035156394,0.0006992919,0.002701216,0.0034592012,0.00070519454,0.0017017584,0.02347159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023660148,0.00013287865,0.00018599896,0.0008030326,0.001496003,0.0020318155,0.0017058639,0.0027578322,0.001284781],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082389225,0.0007694659,0.35805428,0.0002564392,0.00014803249,0.0019832575,0.01402335,0.0007954214,0.00044140592,0.15526274,0.25170985,0.21573187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018311616,0.00028754034,0.34180418,0.001206089,0.00008154571,0.0010035244,0.19067878,0.0016018071,0.00073217205,0.05816394,0.4041567,0.0001005879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0504831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095671244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0504831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028735416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030818998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10037851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062964913","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0335.2008.00686.x","title":"Redistributive Effects of Transfer Programmes in the United Kingdom","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economica","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; University of Warwick","keywords":"Decile; Redistribution (election); Transfer (computing); Economics; Welfare; Conditional cash transfer; Econometrics; Cash; Demographic economics; Metric (unit); Value (mathematics); Mathematics; Statistics; Macroeconomics; Economic growth; Political science; Computer science; Operations management; Poverty","score_opus":0.029822050134132003,"score_gpt":0.26698861025107007,"score_spread":0.23716656011693807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062964913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732144,0.0018437713,0.0010754844,0.0028237277,0.00006200809,0.000033626584,0.0008191968,0.00005526792,0.020072592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756867,0.00030479342,0.00009011661,0.00009351273,0.0000051203106,0.000010328477,0.00009482025,0.0000052719756,0.0018273013],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975908,0.0012683014,0.00007786689,0.00012550066,0.0001558233,0.00078177586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745256,0.0012607487,0.0005398755,0.00019129974,0.00033719218,0.00021832244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016184001,0.00031491584,0.0007845392,0.0008092653,0.0006801611,0.0019468127,0.00053162395,0.00082792883,0.0060707284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007668203,0.00020840087,0.00056741736,0.0010790018,0.0008075232,0.00079613226,0.0022284437,0.00063576055,0.00047667781],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0063936687,0.00090741157,0.18555701,0.00095132284,0.0009360659,0.004535916,0.005398868,0.36191925,0.0041043274,0.24306911,0.026157042,0.16007003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014993156,0.0012736873,0.77100295,0.000732562,0.000719329,0.00082839717,0.010205209,0.118883245,0.0033917334,0.03657296,0.054656997,0.00023353405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20582616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17278631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20582616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065343413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013025469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40925622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065062315","doi":"10.1257/jep.20.3.27","title":"Changes in Labor Force Participation in the United States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic Perspectives","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":281,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Economics; Labour economics; Social force; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.026345855023827372,"score_gpt":0.3100674629939389,"score_spread":0.28372160797011153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065062315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817045,0.003418017,0.00009055551,0.0021012775,0.00007902235,0.000012044019,0.0024479716,0.000011897663,0.010134608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99369013,0.0026522262,0.00011955809,0.00035674978,0.000051995143,0.000019636866,0.0016675339,0.0000031374611,0.0014389828],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952126,0.0001616107,0.000039597082,0.00004595212,0.00010684994,0.0001247444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991148,0.00016519937,0.00028908686,0.000022764327,0.0002312825,0.00017687643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075780763,0.000109212626,0.00014856127,0.0012371117,0.0005305186,0.0007055148,0.00022760626,0.00037351882,0.0016641556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015894141,0.00009189999,0.0001796564,0.0018169873,0.0003583022,0.0003456181,0.0005233937,0.0004013831,0.00028752818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001004525,0.00010389185,0.9511904,0.00008134619,0.00006344546,0.00018853928,0.003486487,0.00030401532,0.00030581153,0.0012513192,0.007237151,0.035687175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026376017,0.000034572113,0.99049896,0.000047657133,0.0000066429307,0.00006893233,0.0022229264,0.000090558424,0.000055968572,0.00008289537,0.0068830904,0.000005176402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08249779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14454877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08249779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090821274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007127064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16403514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065805300","doi":"10.1177/0193841x06293411","title":"Does Receiving an Earnings Supplement Affect Union Formation? Estimating Effects for Program Participants Using Propensity Score Matching","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Propensity score matching; Receipt; Earnings; Matching (statistics); Disadvantaged; Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Demographic economics; Random assignment; Average treatment effect; Psychology; Economics; Econometrics; Medicine; Accounting; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.13375186684758997,"score_gpt":0.42968491301862294,"score_spread":0.295933046171033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065805300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94648534,0.003430493,0.044234544,0.0010252863,0.000085400396,0.0014411415,0.0006842465,0.0000678288,0.0025457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821326,0.00096465985,0.015284513,0.00018686685,0.000027268281,0.00064216956,0.00021661041,0.0000060589387,0.0005393009],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96752155,0.028017087,0.0010208148,0.0012582681,0.001791087,0.00039114387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96418333,0.028455831,0.0047274022,0.0019884224,0.00049463724,0.00015044674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03367358,0.00039015617,0.0010788476,0.0010042355,0.00047591826,0.0007021778,0.0008597038,0.0008422233,0.0016203091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05746154,0.00024839488,0.0019260058,0.0014954382,0.00086422684,0.0005302378,0.00078263663,0.00059798564,0.00015727272],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057974993,0.002871907,0.6071601,0.0017706559,0.012205306,0.00013527567,0.0019075525,0.009074802,0.001711087,0.008011852,0.0010641665,0.34828982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021861678,0.014808717,0.9059773,0.00064770645,0.019941056,0.00015416482,0.001956835,0.026011867,0.0069158264,0.011917292,0.009380723,0.00010227466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015354732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010519582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03367358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092485204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021229822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17808509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067385268","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-9713.2013.00650.x","title":"Hey Baby, What's Your Sign? How Children Born Under Sagittarius are Denied Day Care","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Significance","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sign (mathematics); Sagittarius; Pediatrics; Medicine; Psychology; Demography; Family medicine; Sociology; Physics; Astronomy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019447781302274772,"score_gpt":0.25598273919332665,"score_spread":0.2365349578910519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067385268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96547323,0.002080543,0.00011279452,0.020614158,0.00019541258,0.000008031254,0.00012165852,0.000009290687,0.011384812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651426,0.0011133564,0.000044151948,0.0007725105,0.000017434486,0.0000054389275,0.000031734224,0.000008763776,0.0014923007],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982278,0.0006941679,0.00007146677,0.00013215364,0.00026077835,0.0006136828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790776,0.00047853627,0.00068006065,0.000084266896,0.00023865956,0.0006107296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016193034,0.00014820177,0.00051354046,0.00064064265,0.0038392595,0.0029372508,0.00079200155,0.0010641913,0.0072608003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008194267,0.0001957415,0.00044460665,0.000889988,0.0042516002,0.0021026745,0.0021335497,0.0021540124,0.00044694633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016539326,0.00013625808,0.55335975,0.00013338428,0.000092886985,0.0056290827,0.35986552,0.00014670494,0.00060370506,0.012911147,0.022469651,0.04448657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000078210305,0.0000671058,0.13703668,0.00034655628,0.00004895885,0.002614096,0.8354991,0.0000969462,0.00017129548,0.0025362012,0.021522699,0.000052531585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11530018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14400125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11530018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029117977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031217025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22925812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068744844","doi":"10.1007/s001480100109","title":"Optimal food allocation in a slave economy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Allotment; Productivity; Economics; Property rights; Consumption (sociology); Order (exchange); Value (mathematics); Resource productivity; Resource allocation; Microeconomics; Market economy; Economic growth","score_opus":0.02583528258083292,"score_gpt":0.26961704493811783,"score_spread":0.2437817623572849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068744844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9521217,0.00020634191,0.025810089,0.0025280996,0.000046323017,0.000056835015,0.00015094726,0.000040312207,0.019039406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99201,0.00012079247,0.0027642238,0.00008929386,0.000022239341,0.000024772138,0.000023322817,0.000011018368,0.0049344185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999752,0.00011570302,0.000009001336,0.000033251647,0.000014011707,0.00007592962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909043,0.0004891198,0.0000992527,0.000067673034,0.00006414687,0.00018934952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001148831,0.0002937305,0.0015266503,0.00059626513,0.00097504654,0.0019450439,0.00090798736,0.0017919306,0.008226639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037413358,0.00048107453,0.00046862237,0.00037285712,0.001978466,0.0022840025,0.0013984705,0.0007032128,0.00028197168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013431367,0.00061934214,0.010767358,0.0002648273,0.00017106367,0.0009482801,0.0009227802,0.2260955,0.006003125,0.7211594,0.0059430567,0.025762144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056373264,0.00026440358,0.008345691,0.00004504864,0.00005997118,0.00016201317,0.0013891256,0.36401865,0.0004669289,0.622074,0.0025650861,0.00004543046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044735884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005253668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008226639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014036073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012812531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027520835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071113445","doi":"10.1177/1091142113515053","title":"Fiscal Incidence When Family Structure Matters","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Subsidy; Allowance (engineering); Incidence (geometry); Population; Welfare; Public economics; Order (exchange); Tax incidence; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Demography; Finance; Operations management","score_opus":0.023291559062155357,"score_gpt":0.2771567131425435,"score_spread":0.2538651540803881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071113445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9374656,0.0003788631,0.010217127,0.0019172294,0.00004062848,0.000037869875,0.0005812044,0.00004450292,0.04931701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967303,0.00024973197,0.0004995461,0.000047510064,0.000013532878,0.000009453375,0.00013508527,0.000006990106,0.002307831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990971,0.0003304066,0.00003180037,0.00007467377,0.0001420576,0.0003239143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974565,0.0012689545,0.0005719686,0.0002845809,0.00027756576,0.00014054347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019020467,0.00019416983,0.00048225682,0.00073015713,0.0005610128,0.0018387729,0.0006494484,0.00056600216,0.010092044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009513162,0.00016289817,0.00052331237,0.0009444904,0.0011070346,0.0012908065,0.0009636975,0.00092766114,0.0003772592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030972727,0.00025811532,0.3147907,0.00007356089,0.00009085976,0.00055122556,0.0014470434,0.11989309,0.00058608135,0.48171532,0.006016774,0.07426744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010308362,0.00030966185,0.3433652,0.00017220998,0.00014811686,0.000853032,0.008760028,0.22920087,0.0014187597,0.38328445,0.03228842,0.000096209114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029798064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025689535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029798064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036770974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015442204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059249222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071689493","doi":"10.1046/j.1470-6431.2002.00203.x","title":"Do consumption expenditures depend on the household’s relative position in the income distribution?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Economics; Position (finance); Distribution (mathematics); Permanent income hypothesis; Consumer Expenditure Survey; Income distribution; Econometrics; Household income; Demographic economics; Public economics; Macroeconomics; Sociology; Life-cycle hypothesis; Inequality; Aggregate expenditure; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0787162846077214,"score_gpt":0.34944877602414287,"score_spread":0.2707324914164215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071689493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99521637,0.00016268807,0.0004349343,0.00035525684,0.0000051644697,0.000006718571,0.00027800325,0.000005139417,0.0035357296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994356,0.000056180994,0.000053461084,0.000011134816,0.0000028385753,0.000001504735,0.00008920167,0.000001304003,0.00034871185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996216,0.000086170614,0.000014835165,0.00007851111,0.00007565237,0.00012316031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643624,0.0015027138,0.0013055193,0.00022171317,0.0002766144,0.00025707798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096372503,0.00019167074,0.00029753803,0.0007486445,0.00036800804,0.0010037118,0.00051818445,0.0004959551,0.006802153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006602573,0.00018356513,0.00042240194,0.0013454459,0.0013437772,0.00075631787,0.00037968613,0.00042939425,0.0004504315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011752144,0.000041473788,0.99043065,0.0000153305,0.00007202655,0.00009222711,0.00041428488,0.00088909135,0.0002000778,0.0019377738,0.00023694227,0.0055525037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031792733,0.00002327938,0.9963213,0.000010020054,0.000025820418,0.000044860153,0.00083264685,0.0015314748,0.00006159425,0.0008338213,0.00030656497,0.0000053991134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19594453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21052252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19594453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013552365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083097536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38960803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072637281","doi":"10.1007/s11150-004-5646-6","title":"The Effect of Child Benefit Policies on Fertility and Female Labor Force Participation in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Endogeneity; Economics; Cointegration; Labour economics; Total fertility rate; Labour supply; Demographic economics; Population; Econometrics; Demography; Family planning; Research methodology; Sociology","score_opus":0.020378744492779134,"score_gpt":0.26250480988123936,"score_spread":0.24212606538846024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072637281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7412661,0.16925487,0.00046100313,0.048168603,0.0003437629,0.000063979474,0.009299845,0.000040556784,0.031101277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9238317,0.06259664,0.00030620053,0.0018848059,0.00012030491,0.000020070122,0.0011133312,0.000018954046,0.010107977],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977563,0.0003893623,0.0000623993,0.00013176548,0.00065072445,0.0010093995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950702,0.0014886111,0.00045443568,0.00008786278,0.0019840165,0.0009147588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020955259,0.00027207963,0.0007202767,0.0019558028,0.0028895207,0.002046614,0.0014110733,0.0010092523,0.0051169447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008210163,0.0002408832,0.0008309322,0.0045139305,0.0015047322,0.0004866509,0.0010139795,0.0014722568,0.00015078521],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001150707,0.00032205027,0.70049614,0.0013121386,0.00091328274,0.00081037433,0.0028035599,0.010389715,0.00045036984,0.05484896,0.041468933,0.18503381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007904236,0.0000830853,0.94660187,0.00056545035,0.00035879383,0.00011016371,0.0029698159,0.0018117031,0.0002595922,0.002775961,0.044327326,0.000057309368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99737537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078172855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078172855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12197484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5671864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074097612","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00214.x","title":"THE EARLY BIRD GETS THE WORM? BIRTH ORDER EFFECTS IN A DYNAMIC FAMILY MODEL","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Order (exchange); Scope (computer science); Birth order; Overlapping generations model; Work (physics); Labour economics; Population; Medicine","score_opus":0.01730069346963627,"score_gpt":0.2747363820537045,"score_spread":0.25743568858406823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074097612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6529041,0.0040362184,0.19405262,0.025460241,0.00032172,0.000121232464,0.0032773921,0.00030326218,0.119523145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615037,0.0018041874,0.004745121,0.0003285008,0.00011440623,0.00006747947,0.00033511204,0.000041572024,0.031060014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996939,0.00013937707,0.000007930201,0.000048641698,0.000024616793,0.00008548795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842083,0.00096046116,0.00021400405,0.0000830248,0.00007985864,0.0002417682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013078058,0.000411874,0.0006962194,0.00069665216,0.0010498846,0.0017931586,0.0015233452,0.001395404,0.017680809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004329557,0.00034136596,0.0006933332,0.000932437,0.0012401515,0.002319592,0.0009469174,0.0014034276,0.0009940119],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013176241,0.00012571347,0.016406596,0.000059529866,0.00008697618,0.0007649777,0.00090279855,0.18655363,0.0001984736,0.76774454,0.011528451,0.015496537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009865313,0.000077088465,0.0065849316,0.000070839924,0.00010022677,0.00039273687,0.00086275476,0.4917766,0.000053999232,0.48856744,0.011368305,0.00004638867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029081788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023589117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029081788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023479236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083758746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059148133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075002587","doi":"10.1086/498585","title":"Who Marries Whom and Why","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":612,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Marriage market; Legalization; Matching (statistics); Spillover effect; Transferable utility; Economics; Econometrics; Function (biology); Nonparametric statistics; Demographic economics; Demography; Statistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Sociology; Biology; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.012543195560522653,"score_gpt":0.26247015921558864,"score_spread":0.24992696365506598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075002587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49295017,0.007015574,0.08948945,0.106153026,0.0011042727,0.00023186182,0.0023386416,0.00027757086,0.3004394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525454,0.0018192392,0.0029960736,0.0016628209,0.00017754694,0.000027561613,0.00019603987,0.000019064353,0.04055636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938166,0.00028498116,0.000013559135,0.00012077948,0.00008484682,0.00011409671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989311,0.00040305645,0.0002676206,0.000091524926,0.00014127114,0.00016551289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013319313,0.00011168461,0.00033072263,0.0004005179,0.0007884334,0.0016474475,0.00043246185,0.000879776,0.017174551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005084768,0.00014013413,0.00019444179,0.0004085176,0.00092840387,0.0018107479,0.00041122627,0.0007302789,0.0033293383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016846912,0.00019886362,0.10220258,0.00014063162,0.00011262219,0.0012370265,0.005859908,0.0043132207,0.0010558431,0.60961163,0.044603396,0.23049593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005740397,0.00018236577,0.05684357,0.00024972355,0.00012978619,0.0023869912,0.014414749,0.04262625,0.0011576115,0.6285359,0.25331584,0.00009986065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067903404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071091573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017174551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069320993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009778091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057454586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077066709","doi":"10.1007/s00148-008-0211-x","title":"Who benefits from paid family leave? Impact of expansions in Canadian paid family leave on maternal employment and transfer income","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Parental leave; Social policy; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Wage; Marital status; Family income; Family Leave; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Work (physics); Transfer (computing); Population; Demography; Sociology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.034575871633452014,"score_gpt":0.27229259111919346,"score_spread":0.23771671948574144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077066709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819903,0.0018331875,0.00004400141,0.007581751,0.000063857035,0.000024405186,0.002097723,0.000007708445,0.0063571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99475527,0.0008475132,0.000051141476,0.00038429812,0.000022800754,0.000010369095,0.0006098081,0.000005590219,0.0033131856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966092,0.00025157607,0.00008945447,0.00017557615,0.00064665097,0.0022275941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935626,0.0008486253,0.0010589487,0.00015533238,0.0016761171,0.0026983921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019114327,0.00037184157,0.0007959673,0.0014898748,0.005308707,0.0030497075,0.0027575856,0.0017613366,0.009574314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009009808,0.0003539429,0.0016057441,0.0029230246,0.001610536,0.0011439229,0.0029659295,0.003625452,0.00035162005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008832144,0.00029951867,0.9659822,0.000053001302,0.00016014399,0.00044395946,0.005819198,0.00061967195,0.00020635403,0.0037547587,0.0051910216,0.016586859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001935654,0.00003210454,0.98557,0.00008793587,0.00006528498,0.000058644604,0.010507448,0.00039391808,0.000055004675,0.00018974903,0.002991939,0.0000285968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07295871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07295871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09371465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52935493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077299147","doi":"10.1007/s11150-008-9040-7","title":"Marriage market imbalances and labor force participation of Canadian women","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Boom; Economics; Explanatory power; Negative correlation; Positive correlation; Demographic economics; Baby boom; Marriage market; Labour economics; Similarity (geometry); Power (physics); Demography; Population","score_opus":0.03809126849676088,"score_gpt":0.25023104935330753,"score_spread":0.21213978085654667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077299147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73263055,0.19714646,0.00021238255,0.025839819,0.0002203685,0.000042728083,0.0049404944,0.000009806871,0.038957447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8845516,0.10689415,0.00015851157,0.0010537615,0.00013608033,0.000014395464,0.00088522024,0.0000061347528,0.0063001574],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925333,0.00008981874,0.000027015196,0.0000680702,0.00028561492,0.00027609634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987657,0.00023304812,0.0002208253,0.000024884344,0.0005419306,0.00021358082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011824364,0.00022927269,0.00036808118,0.0034351398,0.0032994857,0.0021202485,0.00097610895,0.0008524408,0.004625185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036850348,0.00018476642,0.00035502206,0.009196883,0.0016783056,0.00075938035,0.0007826829,0.0006954144,0.0001373439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040322152,0.00021557076,0.64650154,0.0010553851,0.00027804633,0.000828572,0.013128725,0.0016534778,0.00051916845,0.045724988,0.02813046,0.2615609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010004749,0.000021411375,0.9508771,0.00046631112,0.00005574611,0.00011100615,0.011196804,0.00033324258,0.000058810376,0.002009201,0.03482389,0.00003654424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99253017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99646086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03578143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03578143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04370155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25961363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077634312","doi":"10.1007/s11266-011-9207-3","title":"Dispensing Charity: The Deficiencies of an All-or-Nothing Fiscal Concept","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Welfare; Nothing; Order (exchange); Social Welfare; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Law and economics; Economic growth; Law; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.039198833658514246,"score_gpt":0.2996925388603003,"score_spread":0.26049370520178605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077634312","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06921714,0.009083271,0.04922179,0.6445939,0.0051370794,0.00014345469,0.00016873152,0.0001733995,0.22226115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91605914,0.0027550783,0.014089673,0.05349913,0.0016011884,0.00023653755,0.00005613428,0.00012052384,0.011582622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9553815,0.027623694,0.0021990773,0.0018573047,0.010877303,0.0020610443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9280107,0.038886663,0.00627624,0.007381147,0.014022687,0.0054225572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053753607,0.00035633158,0.00082920433,0.0032526997,0.0089424,0.012598336,0.0030644652,0.0056805452,0.003341803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08772051,0.00045255953,0.0005657886,0.0024316981,0.05968472,0.014418231,0.010996636,0.01095346,0.0006599143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013358594,0.000027111395,0.00049561536,0.000046264373,0.0000042279603,0.00001614926,0.001423329,0.00010371156,0.000030601845,0.9833066,0.0058566113,0.008676349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039871007,0.00006153085,0.0012487806,0.0009169169,0.000015871423,0.00016758745,0.007252175,0.00067788694,0.00021957578,0.8808597,0.10848641,0.000053646367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007193965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008467582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053753607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009321776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024646753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28427958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080157152","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4991.2010.00377.x","title":"THE GROWTH OF FAMILY EARNINGS INEQUALITY IN CANADA, 1980–2005","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Income and Wealth","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Assortative mating; Economics; Inequality; Educational attainment; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Distribution (mathematics); Demography; Sociology; Population; Economic growth","score_opus":0.016471606756277284,"score_gpt":0.29840576659769497,"score_spread":0.2819341598414177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080157152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8578484,0.05729078,0.0007955647,0.007877886,0.00021914633,0.00007565734,0.039749917,0.00011720946,0.036025446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967246,0.018463643,0.0007105739,0.00037564867,0.00007382795,0.000020384967,0.0065615363,0.00001694521,0.00653141],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919635,0.000030492976,0.000031289357,0.00008994639,0.0004280006,0.00022397192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974746,0.00010052383,0.00038168026,0.00004858007,0.0016192037,0.00037542937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007490663,0.00033225215,0.00034096217,0.004570772,0.002446826,0.0018325783,0.000947634,0.00032698928,0.0020613961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027928902,0.00017347003,0.00039456395,0.012513375,0.00070988445,0.0006139064,0.00080405106,0.0006785567,0.00018151086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003318729,0.00007427974,0.7440638,0.0004987745,0.0002467009,0.00072760665,0.0050904728,0.0023239786,0.0005898958,0.008642245,0.033416484,0.20399395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047687527,0.000008264597,0.9755577,0.000098279364,0.000023574834,0.00009146379,0.0009291818,0.00055742403,0.000112338355,0.00016942392,0.022428848,0.00001863593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99783355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07099801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07099801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059084106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5151291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080914601","doi":"10.1353/jda.2005.0001","title":"Relative Employment and Earnings of Female Household Heads in Mexico, 1987-1995","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of developing areas","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Wage; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Demography; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.038244619943925584,"score_gpt":0.2862463244164543,"score_spread":0.24800170447252873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080914601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982127,0.00019294006,0.000023465782,0.00010113535,0.000004033233,0.000003487418,0.0008800113,0.0000018330667,0.0005804902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969928,0.00034340084,0.00004061992,0.000026079984,0.000011680321,0.0000072041807,0.0014736338,0.0000010410715,0.0011034778],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999895,0.000008967422,0.000005048069,0.000015285146,0.000023799872,0.000051908646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995635,0.00003085284,0.00026342322,0.000009843701,0.000073276635,0.00005905286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025005772,0.0001100245,0.00014086884,0.0006412073,0.00044536992,0.00032650767,0.0002340751,0.00018039711,0.0017610975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007910044,0.00009852146,0.000126345,0.0006378328,0.00012641936,0.000220277,0.00026788376,0.00023354679,0.00022304582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038964667,0.000022342409,0.9951828,0.0000083026325,0.000012648636,0.00005918955,0.0002901525,0.00006673399,0.00007579669,0.000060132832,0.0006078775,0.003574939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013855852,0.0000099890085,0.9987301,0.000003854104,0.0000041136304,0.000029499884,0.00040469822,0.000042987296,0.000032050204,0.000007841016,0.00073268876,8.924468e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073212184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1123795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073212184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006794329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027728287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14557207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082135825","doi":"10.1257/app.1.1.251","title":"The Social Multiplier and Labor Market Participation of Mothers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Applied Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Instrumental variable; Economics; Composition (language); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Geography; Econometrics","score_opus":0.010375625795554991,"score_gpt":0.26655525160031995,"score_spread":0.25617962580476494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082135825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998176,0.000060876486,0.00011983125,0.00012906396,0.0000018481545,0.0000027662763,0.0000581373,0.0000015275431,0.0014499672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910885,0.000047075246,0.000046198555,0.000010988282,0.000004247076,0.000003668912,0.00003543389,5.98713e-7,0.0007429852],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996623,0.00015893075,0.00000880094,0.00003756663,0.000058232636,0.00007416349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985594,0.0005811963,0.00055542664,0.00006200834,0.00006780149,0.00017408788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007028553,0.00011910464,0.00016003182,0.0004735513,0.00033581723,0.00047549268,0.0001702723,0.00019022459,0.006745217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032235594,0.00007327042,0.00011153327,0.0003270622,0.00032295397,0.00020231724,0.00052239385,0.00018009995,0.00031673964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012230511,0.00010442879,0.9729418,0.000016342967,0.00004325562,0.00021863982,0.0015947113,0.00056626945,0.0009869875,0.0042370367,0.00034690028,0.018821409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000811975,0.00006886888,0.9945269,0.000014438924,0.000009627171,0.00010228146,0.0014603819,0.000764057,0.00021831284,0.0013762926,0.0014469167,0.0000038618737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050704274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067362585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006745217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005949649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030939758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022565007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084259912","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.241","title":"Budget 2010 and the Universal Child Care Benefit: An Inquiry into the Gendered Nature of Childcare in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Child care; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.009506277630801509,"score_gpt":0.22152288642231355,"score_spread":0.21201660879151205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084259912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7375551,0.0067607337,0.0006547977,0.077593386,0.0003036863,0.00013826677,0.0018121543,0.000022435324,0.17515944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779368,0.0018749327,0.00024690048,0.003813939,0.000030030364,0.000050788272,0.00017230958,0.000013435457,0.01586079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923133,0.00060861785,0.00011315681,0.000342076,0.002022777,0.0046000066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99345386,0.0014703143,0.0006346898,0.00014153689,0.0019456826,0.0023539616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00264608,0.00021975276,0.00049574167,0.0017763695,0.0141894845,0.0062530437,0.001606398,0.0018907477,0.0065895473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011151183,0.00034297502,0.00043086626,0.0040493985,0.005048201,0.0017708129,0.0035746712,0.0028127225,0.00013680826],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000249029,0.00018903222,0.29116002,0.0003179274,0.000109716755,0.0014020213,0.07693268,0.0017131199,0.00081158587,0.508519,0.04432431,0.07427155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070099384,0.00007934156,0.53551835,0.0007287873,0.00012561832,0.00019970504,0.13387507,0.001356652,0.0004620389,0.01249059,0.31494096,0.00015274959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99765044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78133917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21866086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28567034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90624267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086301890","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.2.267","title":"Global Distributive Justice: The Potential for a Feminist Analysis of International Tax Revenue Allocation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Tax revenue; Public economics; Tax reform; Scholarship; Economics; Double taxation; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; Accounting","score_opus":0.015324835057127137,"score_gpt":0.28168090878942564,"score_spread":0.2663560737322985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086301890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031494625,0.0056735026,0.023195285,0.09727375,0.0006058408,0.00004053519,0.000066196786,0.000037618818,0.8416127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9581721,0.0023708178,0.003925911,0.0071481084,0.000605719,0.00007936156,0.000029848128,0.000082932514,0.027585195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676573,0.0020470459,0.000033270746,0.00026651635,0.00036436986,0.0005231097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976307,0.0015690427,0.00017886709,0.00022553546,0.00020877607,0.00018706358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006025212,0.0005337496,0.0004057577,0.0024714377,0.006676308,0.009295067,0.0010843271,0.0022962638,0.007443862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004432612,0.00017593957,0.00045998156,0.0018667242,0.032880295,0.010481384,0.00521502,0.0039036905,0.00030105232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017322336,0.000002767067,0.00010346827,0.000004445892,0.0000010662532,0.00001662322,0.002235374,0.00006185548,0.000009776286,0.99525934,0.00080363953,0.0014998735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063305497,0.000008708251,0.000618749,0.00013441409,0.0000056640174,0.000057145444,0.015206121,0.00033156946,0.00012542208,0.8629257,0.12057342,0.0000066065213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074534016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013858135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009295067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007638096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046188296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05541855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086431135","doi":"10.1353/ecf.2000.0059","title":"Impotent Fathers: Patriarchy and Demographic Crisis in the Eighteenth-Century Novel (review)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Power (physics); Estate; History; Sociology; Criticism; Literature; Law; Gender studies; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.016695054170210794,"score_gpt":0.2609268489509003,"score_spread":0.2442317947806895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086431135","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022964779,0.9978144,0.0000049030828,0.0011584129,0.00018409215,0.0000010870141,0.000006252489,4.819949e-7,0.0006006948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025344898,0.99615735,0.000011539629,0.00057179626,0.00041586783,0.0000048546017,0.000014886096,9.768719e-7,0.00028826797],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995958,0.00017350806,0.0000437106,0.00004574815,0.00009423678,0.000046906076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982973,0.0010234409,0.0003037756,0.000020563415,0.0002359957,0.00011891237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010784838,0.0004512887,0.00080309657,0.0025573715,0.0007488203,0.002905091,0.00065677206,0.0015811357,0.0048542605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028301387,0.00030342405,0.00038278225,0.00346463,0.0020112435,0.002923012,0.0010813314,0.0014875401,0.0010097725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017255876,0.00018786051,0.0029828197,0.06297699,0.00034642452,0.0009932832,0.010640304,0.00019500378,0.0002291028,0.02038019,0.23021555,0.6706799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028767136,0.00009684569,0.00852891,0.045473617,0.00012896495,0.0018178296,0.006959679,0.000023022072,0.00007320984,0.0012783017,0.9355624,0.000028481814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064452863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011640902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064452863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00168163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031200529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016239107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086820752","doi":"10.1177/136346150504200413","title":"Book Review: Families, Labour and Love: Family Diversity in a Changing World","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transcultural Psychiatry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies; Anthropology","score_opus":0.017545237273955672,"score_gpt":0.2712483691670513,"score_spread":0.2537031318930956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086820752","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000101291604,0.8770416,0.0001851604,0.030481929,0.08391615,0.000040231385,0.00012518965,0.000022968276,0.008085508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012118185,0.839622,0.0003935799,0.04414657,0.07034723,0.00011538649,0.00020965688,0.000041710424,0.043912057],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991478,0.00024600848,0.00007115298,0.0000923531,0.0003832773,0.00005943784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961771,0.0021870763,0.00018035818,0.00006244221,0.0010773131,0.00031563803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013108312,0.0013221087,0.0028392572,0.0032095173,0.0010552553,0.0025481463,0.0020264527,0.0048990855,0.020861637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00515003,0.0005467245,0.0007494204,0.004999245,0.0014590806,0.002731224,0.0013155062,0.0048478865,0.010139601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012477773,0.000011270278,0.0000420701,0.00089093024,0.000011978456,0.00005062644,0.000021453907,0.000029460747,0.00002994444,0.00052218034,0.9727461,0.025631486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020770296,0.000022105247,0.000424815,0.0018953659,0.000023445571,0.00051282137,0.00007816562,0.000025107865,0.000022635955,0.0007442642,0.99621886,0.000011670608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007872293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029504344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020861637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024042595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028776107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06978911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087906752","doi":"10.3917/rf.007.0085","title":"Équilibre et déséquilibre des comptes amoureux contemporains : le revenu familial remis en question. l'exemple québécois","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches familiales","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07498604935728216,"score_gpt":0.33968736053082504,"score_spread":0.2647013111735429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087906752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80282396,0.0033090264,0.0025670978,0.014162996,0.000158134,0.0000306906,0.000101985905,0.000017100736,0.1768291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97720563,0.0004993893,0.00032560562,0.00028368374,0.000012916609,0.000009257109,0.0000149713605,0.00000691528,0.02164158],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999067,0.00037370212,0.000013255791,0.00014786162,0.00015013524,0.00024810334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989648,0.00023362291,0.00015918894,0.00006715217,0.00023794733,0.00033731843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014128892,0.00022587007,0.00026601867,0.0012206725,0.0139197325,0.0040106494,0.00061346195,0.00096426136,0.009627876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002507992,0.00015314594,0.00016281292,0.0013070648,0.009831977,0.0023742171,0.00253046,0.0011060638,0.0003328869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005240067,0.000042304193,0.037191313,0.000053234133,0.000027807979,0.0008611159,0.61150646,0.00020510078,0.0010203209,0.30885458,0.0046147127,0.03557069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010336176,0.00005655718,0.10031167,0.00026084422,0.000031233365,0.0005804798,0.62405443,0.00045128164,0.0004503272,0.030647982,0.24308531,0.000059559436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.637655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79504806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36234498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01528671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0129292505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7289578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088036692","doi":"10.3386/w8845","title":"Subsidizing the Stork: New Evidence on Tax Incentives and Fertility","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Subsidy; Incentive; Stork; Economics; Population; Jurisdiction; Earned income tax credit; Demographic economics; Public economics; Labour economics; Tax credit; Microeconomics; Demography; Political science; Biology; Sociology","score_opus":0.5277710724192765,"score_gpt":0.5322440992549872,"score_spread":0.004473026835710714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088036692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9494715,0.004753708,0.0021804045,0.008108516,0.00007341971,0.00011015519,0.0022201312,0.00002196468,0.03306027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99428165,0.0015041399,0.00034911567,0.0006099481,0.000048060596,0.000023492305,0.00039738556,0.0000062644795,0.0027800158],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962704,0.0019650331,0.00010658665,0.00035852802,0.0008734943,0.0004259134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94638103,0.03521873,0.011008541,0.0032131257,0.0030228079,0.0011558027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069179726,0.00016406135,0.0004246354,0.0010820492,0.001368121,0.001263889,0.0010246357,0.00091400946,0.0062135137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039141577,0.0001506803,0.00035541016,0.002190831,0.0021786885,0.0006779504,0.00076292944,0.0009865486,0.00029435146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004797692,0.00028045414,0.9203597,0.00015399676,0.0002735064,0.00011949269,0.0024125865,0.0019252378,0.00019351071,0.013104902,0.0043665012,0.056330543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004925977,0.00009124084,0.9791125,0.00012767779,0.00018388705,0.000034940567,0.0021437535,0.0011775972,0.00030128768,0.0031608543,0.013599069,0.000017914514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70182663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8087744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70182663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067347935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071791485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59985876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090465264","doi":"10.1007/s11293-006-9028-8","title":"Age, Retirement, and Expenditure Patterns: An Econometric Study of Older Households","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantic Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Almost ideal demand system; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Public finance; Population; Demographic economics; Goods and services; Retirement age; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Demography; Production (economics); Macroeconomics; Pension; Finance; Economy","score_opus":0.028868959293800314,"score_gpt":0.28168723234488563,"score_spread":0.25281827305108534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090465264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991296,0.00008915956,0.0002040803,0.00010097467,0.0000026663197,0.000006309671,0.000326953,0.0000026385255,0.00013771742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979809,0.00013675021,0.00012740007,0.000040495634,0.000011569057,0.000011245038,0.0008248977,0.0000032667303,0.00086347066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992471,0.0004306009,0.000046654197,0.000061458566,0.000044971042,0.0001692134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99292165,0.004460934,0.0012724227,0.0004055878,0.00028519187,0.0006542251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022300899,0.0003686689,0.0006261163,0.0009579289,0.0008588696,0.0009485892,0.00084781944,0.0009459286,0.0042229043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006865572,0.00054738094,0.0014369526,0.0024950171,0.00060548855,0.001130459,0.0009468063,0.0012479798,0.0005999737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043501882,0.00035250944,0.9922692,0.000015301253,0.0002653548,0.00020011056,0.0005632639,0.002288869,0.00012420301,0.0002466755,0.00032830413,0.002911193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029189005,0.00027235714,0.9878876,0.000014476405,0.00021686328,0.00011446009,0.003218561,0.0074975616,0.00008496717,0.00021133015,0.00043689477,0.00001573764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077497855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09189535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077497855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009808672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070514245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1540935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090752746","doi":"10.1257/mac.5.1.168","title":"Taxes and Time Use: Fiscal Policy in a Household Production Model","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Macroeconomics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Work (physics); Production (economics); Economics; Matching (statistics); Care work; Time-use survey; Labour economics; Public economics; Work time; Business; Demographic economics; Macroeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.01672366719767252,"score_gpt":0.2537615129067672,"score_spread":0.23703784570909467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090752746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37732187,0.0053170803,0.34152353,0.018811416,0.00082751544,0.00054386334,0.01644019,0.0012524978,0.23796204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87147623,0.0026272328,0.0107049495,0.0005021875,0.00020070947,0.00039285712,0.0019382228,0.000116146235,0.11204146],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994217,0.00023064329,0.000024336021,0.00010220572,0.000060371,0.0001607592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895334,0.00057826523,0.0001450173,0.00005907177,0.00011737857,0.000146859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015196233,0.0009131861,0.0013676318,0.0010562566,0.0011567865,0.003989047,0.0018624611,0.0023796072,0.01726468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034327607,0.00084587105,0.000985835,0.0023683682,0.0013311629,0.0022551925,0.0015227317,0.0017480414,0.002287651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015435985,0.000139609,0.0033425319,0.0000646645,0.000059133956,0.00022529955,0.00017791516,0.7883037,0.00014395015,0.19353339,0.006771706,0.0070837387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001452562,0.00009335008,0.0019479396,0.00007452617,0.00007483548,0.000075338816,0.00040061306,0.8847199,0.00009584236,0.101654254,0.010675961,0.000042124517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050455276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024171136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050455276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004721698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029560276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1003232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091056955","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4991.2007.00239.x","title":"FAMILIES, TIME AND MONEY IN CANADA, GERMANY, SWEDEN, THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE UNITED STATES","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Income and Wealth","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Crunch; Economics; Demographic economics; Economic shortage; Work (physics); Labour economics; Work hours; Demography; Working hours; Population; Sociology; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.01849650319889861,"score_gpt":0.291769720181285,"score_spread":0.2732732169823864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091056955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656371,0.00948699,0.00008987773,0.00041163803,0.000016719392,0.00002385701,0.018232772,0.0000113916785,0.006089673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97586024,0.011463831,0.00024036382,0.000076883305,0.0000103359525,0.000034238405,0.009116807,0.000008264929,0.0031889607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932384,0.00007673612,0.0000410043,0.000079596626,0.00022523027,0.00025353284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998749,0.00019271445,0.00041044486,0.000023224562,0.0003508589,0.0002737701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062674173,0.00024120841,0.00042661882,0.004562584,0.0019090407,0.0016492468,0.00058652495,0.00023813834,0.002388794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020486289,0.00019863863,0.00031303693,0.014622065,0.0005423819,0.00051875995,0.00089082454,0.00034319662,0.00018999419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013813908,0.000050224982,0.924761,0.0004049935,0.0002480265,0.0005686394,0.008957821,0.0008940035,0.000090915084,0.00403787,0.014675345,0.04517293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005269253,0.0000094545285,0.9789677,0.00016669196,0.000038810915,0.000071661736,0.008121986,0.0001799711,0.000073035844,0.000120610894,0.01222869,0.000015950509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98335373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99207217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016646266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014566169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011238911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10568541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091128987","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v4n1p240","title":"Sustainable Rural Development though Women Participation in SMEs Business Growth in Sindh","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Sustainable development; Sustainable growth rate; Business development; Women entrepreneurs; Economic growth; Political science; Marketing; Economics; Entrepreneurship; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.020497054860343228,"score_gpt":0.26428714218115784,"score_spread":0.2437900873208146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091128987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99415576,0.0001898772,0.000056102384,0.00051683845,0.0000060261414,0.00000770448,0.00001984967,9.970979e-7,0.005046712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987607,0.00012837577,0.000026479313,0.000043316028,0.0000027896804,0.00000446731,0.000005813982,4.452583e-7,0.0010277808],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992919,0.0002979791,0.000020394815,0.000045769586,0.000088388246,0.00025556484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933773,0.00021936848,0.00019212776,0.000019472585,0.000048781727,0.00018249474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069985085,0.00014519165,0.0001377577,0.000370792,0.0020199232,0.0011671213,0.00019256063,0.0003395016,0.0049901903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010456413,0.00014558175,0.0000941933,0.00065549894,0.00096905825,0.00065342,0.001104498,0.00035288997,0.00026577403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019778399,0.00042876447,0.68127686,0.00025213143,0.000023536346,0.0030232524,0.20954421,0.00016010058,0.0029328577,0.011373828,0.002404035,0.08838265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011542613,0.00033296095,0.48189682,0.00018678984,0.000020054775,0.0011792254,0.48611525,0.00026067195,0.00076677813,0.0015849157,0.027623704,0.000021219144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043482906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013342443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049901903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064084877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013379393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01669383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091531626","doi":"10.1155/2014/357145","title":"Gender Socialization: Differences between Male and Female Youth in India and Associations with Mental Health","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Population Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Centre for Global Health Research; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; David and Lucile Packard Foundation","keywords":"Mental health; Socialization; Psychology; Positive Youth Development; Demography; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.12660387343636406,"score_gpt":0.4276626986664583,"score_spread":0.3010588252300942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091531626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977704,0.00047970773,0.000027957482,0.00020359889,0.000012219684,0.000004110983,0.0001342233,0.000002769544,0.0013648422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994592,0.00027292868,0.000017703605,0.000036055644,0.000006362173,0.0000035734631,0.000053219042,0.000001508066,0.00014948628],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994655,0.00009708394,0.00003484415,0.00006131602,0.000101800644,0.0002394992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994318,0.000069765185,0.0002504953,0.000023448507,0.000057846966,0.00016649498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004926839,0.00022551266,0.00023057441,0.0013854819,0.0012181365,0.0014687679,0.0004414109,0.0002815577,0.002119606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010498451,0.00022900857,0.00033973536,0.0013740165,0.00103379,0.000689399,0.0012138399,0.0005417911,0.00021762533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004911605,0.000035202058,0.96714014,0.000042341126,0.000019994106,0.00027356355,0.022876037,0.000018440838,0.00028774753,0.00041404477,0.00038597078,0.008457463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.443995e-7,0.000030049074,0.9677288,0.000029763723,0.000008615594,0.000323111,0.03097467,0.000029399296,0.000054902393,0.000079228055,0.0007343758,0.0000062574245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03720111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049857695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03720111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081068696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000667903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073969126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092471761","doi":"10.1007/s11199-010-9885-0","title":"More on the Gendered Division of Household Labor: A Response to Commentators","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sex Roles","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Psychology; Division (mathematics); Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025839438890183794,"score_gpt":0.2963690296338649,"score_spread":0.2705295907436811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092471761","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044135668,0.00059561426,0.00014796066,0.98481977,0.013278644,0.000008242868,0.00004466165,0.000014386569,0.0006492836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004139089,0.0004908456,0.0001648221,0.9771807,0.015626274,0.00004983397,0.000020945967,0.00006771263,0.0022597886],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806698,0.008503686,0.001661487,0.0030961842,0.003670325,0.002398535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85420704,0.111234404,0.0057353578,0.003168512,0.019738369,0.005916264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024103146,0.0018422339,0.0024577559,0.0016593892,0.019730145,0.011493502,0.0068065836,0.06390884,0.012021455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.096323945,0.0013374215,0.002572463,0.0029440594,0.01749475,0.017381258,0.0118031055,0.10411252,0.004367712],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046109817,0.000028822471,0.0004598613,0.00017378262,0.000022106606,0.00055330165,0.022659002,0.000051235937,0.00038210256,0.006608887,0.9663113,0.0027035738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005863671,0.00003965678,0.0020268434,0.0010262724,0.00005342621,0.00047945871,0.06416051,0.00020538352,0.00047046214,0.009232995,0.9220594,0.00018687992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032268945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030657543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06390884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0108330175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012859498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12747115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093445077","doi":"10.1080/0042098032000065272","title":"Economic and Social Status in Household Decision-making: Evidence Relating to Extended Family Mobility","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Economics; Affect (linguistics); Unit (ring theory); Household income; Microeconomics; Demographic economics; Public economics; Labour economics; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.08022876418214692,"score_gpt":0.3481316426051662,"score_spread":0.2679028784230193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093445077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99182117,0.0010827561,0.0009521186,0.00054750446,0.000008007684,0.0000076168967,0.0000607219,0.000002557931,0.0055176946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903643,0.00041708248,0.00014986673,0.00001726179,0.0000063666544,0.0000049198065,0.000030847303,0.0000010954062,0.000336168],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984322,0.0011173455,0.000050563198,0.00013135748,0.00011384664,0.0001545268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788407,0.015595296,0.003390204,0.0010371477,0.00041215558,0.0007245555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004673424,0.00027902625,0.00027181645,0.0007838387,0.000556087,0.0012046483,0.00061519863,0.00058900414,0.00673741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01666043,0.00021402199,0.000423197,0.0010547885,0.0018622164,0.0013909413,0.0013019621,0.00041895502,0.00034698605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008372177,0.000543109,0.9097175,0.00020137393,0.00040264594,0.0005984053,0.0067900512,0.011461075,0.00017975543,0.02636979,0.0005170404,0.04238205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009714003,0.0005706652,0.90976924,0.00030411305,0.00020257717,0.0004761878,0.008833541,0.026810268,0.00021534838,0.04757244,0.00509603,0.000052562482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007382059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007304994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007382059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007522298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047165336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024715722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093635050","doi":"10.3138/cpp.37.3.395","title":"Families, Time, and Well-Being in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Distribution (mathematics); Paid work; Inequality; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Economics; Production (economics); Family income; Income distribution; Labour economics; Economic inequality; Economic growth; Working hours; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.015254163413634109,"score_gpt":0.22143249495333486,"score_spread":0.20617833153970075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093635050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766852,0.0042111715,0.000113972805,0.0023980518,0.000040978397,0.000022465705,0.003511189,0.000012116321,0.013004813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946991,0.0017641148,0.00012052938,0.00013811621,0.000005445162,0.000010348791,0.0006339751,0.000004817907,0.002623521],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990337,0.0000802413,0.000022582453,0.000089621986,0.00021389173,0.00055989815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863017,0.00010782997,0.00021313452,0.000032001157,0.000518526,0.000498355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006743531,0.00026502277,0.0003965752,0.0023833343,0.008200412,0.0023057077,0.00085317943,0.00046167366,0.004190424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001972457,0.00020694196,0.0005039906,0.0059800893,0.0014325291,0.00073752383,0.0012453063,0.000730416,0.00017939809],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019806573,0.00017358272,0.8850922,0.00015302049,0.00014612783,0.000589714,0.030206926,0.001889123,0.00038550142,0.013816085,0.01295321,0.054396443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010184623,0.000027208354,0.9549662,0.0001524001,0.0000358601,0.00008945181,0.025810426,0.00062847603,0.00010674548,0.00066281453,0.017471142,0.000039142717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99875736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99932027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07356633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07356633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06293964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5337636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094036576","doi":"10.2202/1935-1682.2358","title":"High-Powered Careers and Marriage: Can Women Have It All?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Order (exchange); Marriage market; Work (physics); Labour economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Sociology; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.014091697749352797,"score_gpt":0.2869596546004751,"score_spread":0.2728679568511223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094036576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7001518,0.011769184,0.00222458,0.13366257,0.0005001957,0.000038963808,0.00037043422,0.000017254539,0.15126505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99480516,0.0016944496,0.0000700787,0.0010341549,0.000078235644,0.0000045204647,0.000021940168,0.0000018433964,0.0022895893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917054,0.00039928223,0.000015781756,0.00006551275,0.00008305023,0.00026595316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762887,0.0007547165,0.00048149805,0.00007172299,0.0001774562,0.00088569586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015239596,0.00016422961,0.00036308143,0.00060286873,0.0024777774,0.0030564577,0.00046220774,0.0015989451,0.01535136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041972725,0.00016714787,0.00029888167,0.0008314121,0.0034815692,0.0022952775,0.0019502364,0.0010014037,0.00061266817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033617695,0.00047803757,0.3180603,0.0002006893,0.00007365661,0.001386941,0.022581387,0.0011218131,0.00024609908,0.55862397,0.019238768,0.077652186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011513999,0.00049992,0.2426197,0.0013313774,0.000120055825,0.0016542553,0.15252377,0.0036511328,0.00024508138,0.4453133,0.15183412,0.00009219082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012700374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014302389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01535136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016390972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001784523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05135542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094077304","doi":"10.1111/j.1939-7445.2007.tb00214.x","title":"HUMAN FERTILITY DECISIONS AND COMMON PROPERTY RESOURCES: A DYNAMIC ANALYSIS","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Resource Modeling","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University; Government of Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Stock (firearms); Population; Fertility; Renewable resource; Economics; Microeconomics; Human resources; Resource (disambiguation); Natural resource; Environmental economics; Computer science; Ecology; Geography; Demography; Renewable energy; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.03733804213922294,"score_gpt":0.33023960145552483,"score_spread":0.2929015593163019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094077304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77518,0.0008406388,0.1724483,0.0038413364,0.000042108994,0.00011181799,0.0006129871,0.00007072363,0.04685212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901776,0.00031136093,0.0030369393,0.000071790106,0.000010612232,0.000054972774,0.000074758056,0.00000742786,0.0062545133],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969804,0.00013579756,0.000005868841,0.000048800805,0.000041456064,0.00007008289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879885,0.0007909867,0.00018049772,0.000045697645,0.00007037466,0.00011353069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008374717,0.0003124591,0.0005051668,0.00058173615,0.00058213994,0.001341908,0.00068486575,0.00097783,0.0075641638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026702706,0.00031664906,0.00058843294,0.00059397134,0.0012509724,0.0012948427,0.00094317517,0.0007940703,0.00038914284],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007739946,0.00010746291,0.010616289,0.000041316496,0.00006870861,0.0003206719,0.00037091912,0.69654053,0.00067863165,0.2813113,0.0017497268,0.008117047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002817275,0.000066779874,0.0035963927,0.000019574078,0.000028104214,0.000104680854,0.00032669445,0.9367421,0.0001262018,0.056037493,0.0029026538,0.000021139731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014656939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008563261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014656939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021334654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009686683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029143214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094243098","doi":"10.1007/s00148-012-0453-5","title":"Optimal prevention when coexistence matters","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Subsidy; Altruism (biology); Spouse; Imperfect; Social policy; Microeconomics; Bargaining power; Social insurance; Public economics; Labour economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.04074743407245791,"score_gpt":0.30293314890509726,"score_spread":0.26218571483263936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094243098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6499363,0.002878274,0.109231755,0.094290785,0.0017214954,0.0002518296,0.000435708,0.00035272128,0.14090104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927254,0.000302332,0.0022470867,0.00085590384,0.00031099014,0.000032731477,0.000029481704,0.00001675604,0.0034794183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732,0.001014298,0.000102474565,0.00046262945,0.00018644368,0.0009141488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811411,0.014535691,0.0011880555,0.0009876689,0.0007693256,0.001378139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003176295,0.0004962277,0.0018197309,0.00076004566,0.0017949287,0.003988575,0.0011233017,0.004744112,0.017537666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024562899,0.00070688105,0.00051615195,0.00038305015,0.0021349357,0.0044238586,0.002045138,0.0037424716,0.0009228504],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001719588,0.0028076847,0.050642394,0.00062952185,0.00035735386,0.0015682776,0.0011787432,0.025707072,0.0034943414,0.71080476,0.032167953,0.16892226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016650178,0.00025603993,0.008233893,0.00014450855,0.00013734531,0.0005958497,0.0016817048,0.046159286,0.0008286245,0.93693995,0.004827271,0.000028987584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017759561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017121948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017537666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009445593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025193205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05866927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096654005","doi":"10.7202/602228ar","title":"Conjugalité et fécondité des femmes canadiennes : un modèle dynamique estimé à l’aide d’une série de coupes transversales","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.06931396671602749,"score_gpt":0.27655775504295665,"score_spread":0.20724378832692916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096654005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.777427,0.0038543623,0.20211335,0.003984683,0.00014811671,0.00017984721,0.0014350188,0.0001504937,0.010707195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95641774,0.0026776558,0.021155458,0.00019559356,0.000057776335,0.00024743576,0.0006679256,0.000028484474,0.018551862],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984085,0.0007751401,0.000060232833,0.0003727479,0.00013525608,0.00024818254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918344,0.006147454,0.0008450807,0.00054447347,0.00033719416,0.0002914243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005372255,0.00080741436,0.0015383434,0.001695252,0.0008966471,0.002822692,0.0017728885,0.0021267869,0.00799067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01814559,0.0011586121,0.0022570365,0.001717629,0.0017760271,0.0020681275,0.0019253725,0.0021014102,0.00081511424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007658736,0.00032830625,0.25968307,0.00025450237,0.0014530428,0.0006419005,0.0040343716,0.4772528,0.00087616453,0.18568787,0.0021898765,0.06683225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000146713,0.00053445814,0.077780694,0.00032112125,0.0008670704,0.00047192627,0.0019432283,0.78741306,0.00052250485,0.11843693,0.011363103,0.00019918004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083849356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043682408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9161506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027837616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026187608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16672266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096988944","doi":"10.1023/a:1026256917489","title":"Gender Equality and Long-Run Growth","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Growth","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":283,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Economics; Human capital; Demographic economics; Economic geography; Economic system; Development economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.038985541460150715,"score_gpt":0.28810482811025767,"score_spread":0.24911928665010696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096988944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.936821,0.0060774256,0.00047878505,0.015055349,0.00015909101,0.000010400477,0.00040292795,0.000009444705,0.040985487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722594,0.0008312632,0.000045324618,0.00010496323,0.000046131987,0.0000036182296,0.000049593888,0.0000019052227,0.0016913402],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995765,0.00010025884,0.000012169704,0.000035330126,0.000043220713,0.00023255034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978921,0.0006931421,0.00044799483,0.000059157766,0.00022238656,0.0006853562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001367742,0.00018413294,0.00032071993,0.00080186466,0.001364041,0.0022345027,0.00027311142,0.00097398396,0.0074964827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037635916,0.00007068024,0.00020761609,0.0010234294,0.0017696358,0.0021140731,0.0015255786,0.0010800317,0.00032045774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009801699,0.0006853151,0.6402432,0.000111990004,0.00011651716,0.0011397077,0.010011334,0.0014355857,0.00079871295,0.2474786,0.0060953745,0.0909035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005172787,0.00021434657,0.7917683,0.00021720583,0.00007342469,0.00041876064,0.02860006,0.0012485941,0.00061631366,0.150021,0.026737478,0.000032698583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007555832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014041389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007555832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015352016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015499598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025078237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097123728","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00039.x","title":"The Deinstitutionalization of Marriage Revisited: A New Institutional Approach to Marriage","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Conceptualization; Institution; Institutionalism; Sociology; Positive economics; Criminology; Political science; Social science; Law; Epistemology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.029863716397236367,"score_gpt":0.3115397114504248,"score_spread":0.2816759950531884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097123728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28565103,0.108965024,0.14809121,0.12377343,0.0012180663,0.00013292128,0.00011017863,0.00010429027,0.33195373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97893447,0.012680795,0.0044967225,0.0014423983,0.00056132674,0.000058190413,0.000015649584,0.000009676819,0.0018007753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99474853,0.003532868,0.00018902984,0.0005386767,0.0006167336,0.00037409246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962364,0.001679808,0.00068722497,0.0006771011,0.0004018791,0.00031758964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004696174,0.00016922751,0.0006332929,0.002290501,0.003176348,0.004824332,0.0013734826,0.0021205381,0.0015971982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006486247,0.00023171825,0.0006272317,0.0028506767,0.029090324,0.006648903,0.0051697833,0.002710932,0.00014987013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005439782,0.000007784001,0.00060193695,0.000030429857,0.000003721891,0.000037643833,0.0020690577,0.00025160314,0.000045467877,0.99103516,0.00017295367,0.005738713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000117967365,0.00003555674,0.0024934984,0.00016691233,0.000012917502,0.00022450316,0.0032049569,0.0009153926,0.00012306769,0.94619083,0.046601694,0.000018962364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049097063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038213967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057736593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057736593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004671313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04189104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098091184","doi":"10.3386/w15284","title":"The Rug Rat Race","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Race (biology); Demography; Biology; Sociology; Botany","score_opus":0.27991731654282886,"score_gpt":0.5202729776746507,"score_spread":0.24035566113182188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098091184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014962603,0.0030984003,0.000518268,0.031745236,0.0024036807,0.000043113625,0.00089482,0.00015167316,0.9461822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07990549,0.0030954278,0.0005786292,0.01356454,0.0004484983,0.000051332165,0.0009097252,0.00020419022,0.9012421],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933964,0.00012128874,0.000012100307,0.00012756391,0.00017662576,0.00022266158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993661,0.000059574897,0.000042042808,0.000080502585,0.00015401207,0.00029775922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005975372,0.0005105257,0.00052794215,0.001228143,0.0068752943,0.005722691,0.0006313499,0.0017931183,0.16782252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00205806,0.00020123793,0.0003623608,0.0013069883,0.0027823893,0.0024648434,0.003735541,0.0023156472,0.041217625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000505624,0.000062087805,0.008200227,0.000044202534,0.000010259892,0.00029597225,0.0023848983,0.00008666346,0.00016950318,0.12555367,0.7660391,0.0971029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030078368,0.000012238425,0.0037883546,0.00005631963,0.0000019017358,0.000064356886,0.0012262275,0.000023808758,0.00003359905,0.0024802685,0.9923063,0.0000036585845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08591736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18923421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16782252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024659822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036923392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5614223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098170228","doi":"10.1186/2193-9004-2-19","title":"Labour supply and income distribution effects of the working income tax benefit: a general equilibrium microsimulation analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IZA Journal of Labor Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Employment and Social Development Canada","funders":"Human Resources and Skills Development Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Labour supply; Microsimulation; Labour economics; Income distribution; Welfare; General equilibrium theory; Gross income; Distribution (mathematics); Work (physics); Income tax; State income tax; Public economics; Macroeconomics; Tax reform; Market economy","score_opus":0.007440089519878464,"score_gpt":0.27006158351324844,"score_spread":0.26262149399337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098170228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9456771,0.00058185426,0.033498157,0.002739795,0.00007777605,0.00017564553,0.0014640164,0.000121636636,0.015664022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989828,0.00031916006,0.002532011,0.00015305582,0.000019028976,0.00008058317,0.00028835825,0.000017806684,0.006762004],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993949,0.00023104151,0.000014948157,0.000072198476,0.000049729726,0.00023731017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808747,0.001136415,0.00025084158,0.00008475714,0.00025822452,0.00018230068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016225415,0.00063546735,0.0014960442,0.0007834503,0.0010182918,0.0014611941,0.0012129095,0.0009970488,0.007108921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052870233,0.00043126135,0.0014588388,0.0008508794,0.0011623097,0.001003111,0.0013204613,0.0012373639,0.0002844062],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011254414,0.00009065929,0.007588393,0.000044917066,0.00010640639,0.00015703664,0.000113356116,0.9558844,0.00028321048,0.030894099,0.0013959531,0.003329033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008229959,0.00010616396,0.0053297114,0.000018546152,0.000107566084,0.000024037337,0.00045867576,0.98075956,0.00016754134,0.0115951,0.0013232003,0.000027526741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48712137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.319738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48712137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006857923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056524877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.968572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098693646","doi":"","title":"The Child Care Policy That Wasn't","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Social Policy / Revue canadienne de politique sociale","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.017882068237930576,"score_gpt":0.28501063084605505,"score_spread":0.26712856260812445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098693646","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007002162,0.018640818,0.0014234169,0.8911719,0.014533842,0.000089309106,0.00072947744,0.000059525613,0.06634963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21905373,0.019797683,0.0026520095,0.7031695,0.0059681307,0.0003694858,0.0004523543,0.00015362527,0.04838344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98135906,0.0039690114,0.0008484595,0.0025670906,0.006009305,0.0052471254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876787,0.0032154187,0.0006333213,0.0009315616,0.005277424,0.0022635704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022693368,0.00079873373,0.001496003,0.0028796596,0.008149382,0.008609318,0.0031780652,0.018169742,0.007949696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043779068,0.00091330963,0.0016576336,0.0042526564,0.024833757,0.0075060185,0.0048964527,0.023660434,0.0006571988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042763833,0.00004216256,0.0008944982,0.00044505578,0.000044159442,0.00012560673,0.0018075418,0.0001830707,0.0001708442,0.8553425,0.11645037,0.024451362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001282798,0.000047344318,0.0038743706,0.0019043831,0.000081258506,0.00012331536,0.0031016846,0.00011546487,0.0003384893,0.07783984,0.9123813,0.00006429242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68396735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7440601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9191089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08089109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16203362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6357876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098909956","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2573751","title":"Trends in Earnings Inequality and Earnings Instability Among U.S. Couples: How Important is Assortative Matching?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Economics; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Inequality; Demographic economics; Panel data; Matching (statistics); Social security; Labour economics; Economic inequality; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.02023318282245405,"score_gpt":0.2916455742724665,"score_spread":0.27141239145001245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098909956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941136,0.001277019,0.00007426596,0.0023080688,0.000018511326,0.00000376084,0.0006511959,0.0000037538452,0.0015498524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99911183,0.000386264,0.000020494252,0.00008741633,0.000025321702,0.0000016512782,0.00022245865,7.788802e-7,0.0001437108],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973863,0.000077249155,0.000027948776,0.000051837163,0.000038424147,0.00006594264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998002,0.0003684374,0.0009850276,0.000120258075,0.0002464934,0.00027774987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008502744,0.00009456085,0.00018301689,0.0008085273,0.00048565504,0.00069882587,0.00031448982,0.00057792454,0.0028843954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003813548,0.0001163195,0.0002578493,0.0015600905,0.00041983495,0.00082981493,0.0006256382,0.00069350464,0.00023670813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006756817,0.000030085079,0.991791,0.000008138522,0.000031693613,0.000023812787,0.00035546336,0.000053918466,0.00004574412,0.00051030115,0.0005215802,0.0065606097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018195494,0.000022131078,0.99817944,0.000012340705,0.000011732159,0.000020990485,0.00091323367,0.00018265839,0.000021866925,0.00027208574,0.00035906569,0.0000025893785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03358431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0492949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03358431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038173416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005271434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06677765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098920770","doi":"10.1596/1813-9450-3310","title":"Bundling Services and Household Welfare in Developing Countries: The Case of Peru","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Developing country; Business; Development economics; Economics; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.021778323583185686,"score_gpt":0.25295800375027955,"score_spread":0.23117968016709387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098920770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95795894,0.009210804,0.0011572563,0.006123462,0.000015395754,0.000024322677,0.0011256333,0.000031940017,0.024352178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99062705,0.005757903,0.0006771785,0.0001250748,0.000018681296,0.000038493225,0.00055580185,0.0000048994825,0.0021949885],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966025,0.00019849696,0.000008298462,0.00002091652,0.000031931988,0.000080098675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990125,0.00040949072,0.00034941288,0.000037514805,0.00012381235,0.00006725753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005650804,0.00023724702,0.00024722086,0.0011042567,0.0006574541,0.0008651595,0.00028085476,0.00037359007,0.00241552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002747677,0.00015830877,0.00031870155,0.005179273,0.00063122413,0.00086747995,0.0016838048,0.00062635535,0.00011892647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003869485,0.00031629505,0.7386794,0.0004986109,0.00071326736,0.0025818204,0.018088892,0.009097654,0.0005877664,0.06552006,0.019543536,0.14398581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009041177,0.00028441986,0.8826385,0.0005876475,0.0005859591,0.0007953721,0.02785277,0.008650677,0.00043326398,0.026390618,0.051639017,0.000051318442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059397485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11164475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059397485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016417017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008165972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118103504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099768220","doi":"10.1177/0956797611417260","title":"Opting Out or Denying Discrimination? How the Framework of Free Choice in American Society Influences Perceptions of Gender Inequality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Inequality; Perception; Social psychology; Opting out; Gender inequality; Social perception","score_opus":0.20010252119528876,"score_gpt":0.43286238657465315,"score_spread":0.23275986537936438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099768220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97710234,0.00023341623,0.0009314908,0.005995837,0.000035357392,0.0000086293985,0.000008232919,0.0000029573428,0.01568162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995797,0.0000393393,0.00006590896,0.00016425064,0.0000041558724,0.000002587315,0.0000014455476,0.0000012418428,0.0001412851],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925672,0.0056297947,0.00009473399,0.00033361773,0.00064426236,0.00073039863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99442035,0.003284118,0.000881555,0.00033347917,0.000310988,0.0007695133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007652816,0.000248934,0.00026310005,0.0008822519,0.0042178985,0.0048009297,0.0005134859,0.0010114431,0.002518539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009966852,0.00019527062,0.00030687847,0.00050012604,0.014687215,0.0030899856,0.002892689,0.002038302,0.00008359889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019700448,0.0004364483,0.16597006,0.00007431026,0.000058272748,0.000257639,0.69231373,0.0003740676,0.0016023907,0.10561749,0.0014243695,0.031674277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058803293,0.00019014366,0.1725074,0.00025027044,0.0000739109,0.00021427497,0.7308216,0.0025350857,0.0006846873,0.07376212,0.01881325,0.00008845006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014303954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017394489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014303954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026294221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020200307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040472448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099934967","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.435340","title":"Nobody to Play with? The Implications of Leisure Coordination","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"nobody; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Business; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.009822864553041075,"score_gpt":0.2718673607236912,"score_spread":0.2620444961706501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099934967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5045295,0.0019083525,0.0063440967,0.038798682,0.0002695085,0.000047115744,0.00018233423,0.000035471337,0.44788492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99413174,0.00022468487,0.0003746032,0.00028962942,0.000029992258,0.000019278259,0.000018714054,0.000015293965,0.0048960033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793637,0.000969902,0.000043616274,0.0002751816,0.00014752001,0.0006274191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949574,0.0017948445,0.0007609205,0.00041933428,0.00026463205,0.0018029746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027561593,0.00024510152,0.00042885388,0.000861297,0.0069364505,0.007355457,0.0012976552,0.0016735125,0.02024503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010485825,0.0003294745,0.0003140524,0.0011449422,0.008672448,0.0055401567,0.0044057523,0.0018384255,0.0007578748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043154653,0.0002755096,0.05136976,0.000106015206,0.00004871365,0.0010744015,0.09366625,0.0011884349,0.00066076155,0.77035385,0.012660219,0.068164624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015540038,0.00016693163,0.07811851,0.00034398082,0.000050106366,0.0010157286,0.36103213,0.002000051,0.00052405964,0.46455514,0.091974944,0.000063078885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014654377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013914949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02024503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028032027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00378437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06772643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100983712","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2012.01731.x","title":"Female labour force participation in an era of organizational and technological change","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Workforce; Economics; Technological change; Wage; Human capital; Labour supply; Real wages; Organizational change; Market economy; Economic growth; Political science; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.1431615640251057,"score_gpt":0.23773403783410532,"score_spread":0.09457247380899964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100983712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928624,0.00042711207,0.00008239701,0.0021234383,0.000014100769,0.0000031584343,0.00007549732,0.0000018362837,0.004410094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985819,0.00020043137,0.000021630905,0.00009613722,0.000020052745,0.0000020927125,0.000017485547,7.248158e-7,0.0010595254],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996426,0.000089050896,0.000008710155,0.000043915712,0.00003998861,0.00017570693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925834,0.00019272779,0.00025001555,0.000026862497,0.00005895831,0.00021300842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073748967,0.00009542156,0.00020356746,0.0006854293,0.001153448,0.0010723838,0.0002460972,0.00082322763,0.0072487574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016343708,0.00009439274,0.00010826027,0.0007108675,0.0010984428,0.0007739883,0.0008240309,0.00048614648,0.0002950775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077210495,0.0003468799,0.7624245,0.0001517111,0.00004836462,0.0038515718,0.08741069,0.00057711656,0.0063689826,0.05157248,0.0070321034,0.07944346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000211889,0.00014260171,0.9302132,0.00006918857,0.000007426408,0.0008358208,0.028053394,0.00038853285,0.00035810788,0.0035254417,0.036363985,0.00002110078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012330012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016285388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012330012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001240461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006403344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024516523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101524309","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.132424","title":"Overview: The Regional Economics of Child Care","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"W.K. Kellogg Foundation","keywords":"Economic sector; Spillover effect; Child care; Private sector; Welfare; Public sector; Public economics; Economics; Economic growth; Business; Medicine; Economy; Nursing; Market economy","score_opus":0.03714150503017011,"score_gpt":0.2616737852790643,"score_spread":0.2245322802488942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101524309","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018394692,0.64824086,0.00448977,0.03696698,0.0033416245,0.00004121581,0.002946085,0.00015954426,0.30197445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04505734,0.88626647,0.0032120196,0.004448385,0.0070027644,0.00009041972,0.001725127,0.00021531373,0.051982123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992836,0.00029666265,0.000026972713,0.00009346905,0.00022198039,0.000077455385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990434,0.00035002,0.0001074611,0.00007253209,0.00035944913,0.00006713997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010805714,0.0009001915,0.0005690731,0.0031170968,0.00054389663,0.0035058865,0.0011375969,0.0016076573,0.023946248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002150141,0.0003431053,0.0007899747,0.0061072824,0.000798483,0.0024694991,0.0012174578,0.0018762293,0.0066583357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024094044,0.000024848585,0.0009095955,0.0009986862,0.000035129353,0.00007062075,0.00011877173,0.0023680972,0.000098314995,0.39070606,0.52912694,0.07551887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005622821,0.000008451293,0.0027222945,0.0006201811,0.000018574086,0.00013668214,0.00009620587,0.00037358588,0.000044757384,0.018572217,0.9773881,0.000013243335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032400936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020578092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032400936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00414774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002870334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080108225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102444313","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00378.x","title":"Failing the Transition from Welfare to Work: Women Chronically Disconnected from Employment and Cash Welfare<sup>*</sup>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Disadvantaged; Cash; Welfare reform; Demographic economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Single mothers; Labour economics; Economics; Business; Psychology; Economic growth; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.00990832258737824,"score_gpt":0.2521673317653547,"score_spread":0.2422590091779765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102444313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997097,0.0007810532,0.000037377402,0.0010019722,0.000010541364,0.000005140685,0.00020967814,9.55665e-7,0.0008562463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985537,0.0007582889,0.00004287461,0.0001806375,0.00001840123,0.000016100856,0.00017989002,0.000001061671,0.00024898537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996182,0.00015066039,0.000023148012,0.000039179962,0.000044515167,0.00012431433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983267,0.00046934086,0.0008718897,0.000036816222,0.00006799606,0.00022727645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009923427,0.00012606519,0.00019687315,0.0006196021,0.0008029902,0.0008156815,0.00028722984,0.00037596904,0.0024732111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003346043,0.00015724363,0.00019310415,0.00095559994,0.0006218543,0.00089053944,0.00097406097,0.00048526452,0.00015315381],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061261104,0.00002784201,0.98519117,0.000033441847,0.000023936305,0.0002356531,0.0045353635,0.000025065016,0.00006882124,0.00020137032,0.0010117018,0.008584519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041799735,0.000048016384,0.98045874,0.00006818383,0.000028688686,0.00022773768,0.017454078,0.000056930505,0.000048185153,0.00017368529,0.0014276005,0.0000040330924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012565753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041649505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012565753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076588616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081515004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024985254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103684782","doi":"10.1353/cpp.2010.0024","title":"Implications of the Introduction of the Goods and Services Tax for Families in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Almost ideal demand system; Welfare; Economics; Goods and services; Demographic economics; Public economics; Engel curve; Survey data collection; Income tax; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Production (economics); Economy; Aggregate expenditure","score_opus":0.010255453732197422,"score_gpt":0.2462392602606427,"score_spread":0.23598380652844528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103684782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8761468,0.0050192103,0.0057806796,0.040322293,0.00034040256,0.0001989106,0.016164066,0.00017508041,0.055852547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97962636,0.001602686,0.0013516166,0.0009049738,0.00002402766,0.00002949759,0.0011055613,0.000021470352,0.015333706],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753535,0.00039768632,0.000054575878,0.00018207233,0.00062780903,0.0012024972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628615,0.0011299239,0.00030267946,0.00013413373,0.0015914395,0.0005555184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024229854,0.00033456966,0.00068702665,0.0011676202,0.0033500225,0.0033138492,0.0017537168,0.0010455756,0.008387026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010936982,0.0003239293,0.0010118006,0.0028487227,0.0012715099,0.00096066535,0.0011922545,0.0017728878,0.0002165197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001195717,0.00025355295,0.33408248,0.00039733588,0.0003824764,0.001451244,0.0038413198,0.28156775,0.0008879241,0.24210015,0.044476844,0.0893632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040642728,0.00033665806,0.51741415,0.0005669838,0.00067038834,0.00029193427,0.022696713,0.24593164,0.0025245214,0.038764566,0.17002824,0.0003677431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99800056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121942334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.121942334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.113102406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8847577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103861365","doi":"10.7202/1007755ar","title":"Les représentations des rapports sociaux de sexe au sein des politiques de lutte contre la pauvreté au Pérou","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches féministes","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.22007633825940634,"score_gpt":0.43007756252623897,"score_spread":0.21000122426683263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103861365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95269865,0.0011581895,0.0015768766,0.0028007973,0.000037480597,0.000030645784,0.00008461451,0.0000088054885,0.041603867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99565,0.00040582084,0.0002539861,0.000090622954,0.0000069068897,0.000033191187,0.000017984472,0.0000033932104,0.0035381373],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696785,0.0020203984,0.000089167035,0.0001689571,0.00034586902,0.00040776972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688894,0.0019392996,0.0005649359,0.00015340559,0.00025207904,0.00020134711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034581893,0.00021996345,0.00024370618,0.0013546512,0.003492092,0.0025725793,0.0004862869,0.00059703254,0.0051530967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050800564,0.00021308027,0.00022735314,0.0016210042,0.005691455,0.0020168265,0.0026755636,0.0009182601,0.00017695459],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051865456,0.00001997495,0.029139517,0.00012307084,0.000013136548,0.00024907888,0.9168049,0.000092597395,0.0007985345,0.03403281,0.0004114796,0.018263036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061213827,0.00006300738,0.07376763,0.00020271604,0.000018831375,0.00015834857,0.87582445,0.0001752473,0.0005521887,0.0044378373,0.044772733,0.000020891857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027138403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03862319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027138403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035020788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003053096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05396092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104376558","doi":"10.1093/restud/rds035","title":"Should Day Care be Subsidized?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Economics; Subsidy; Welfare; Consumption (sociology); Labour economics; Labour supply; Deadweight loss; Work (physics); Macroeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.11837847155367162,"score_gpt":0.3813011190089052,"score_spread":0.2629226474552335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104376558","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20653991,0.046807826,0.019643681,0.56994987,0.0024508454,0.0001617315,0.0008615304,0.00018005306,0.15340456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454713,0.010199521,0.0024818636,0.030008314,0.00072846614,0.00008066923,0.00008604328,0.00002320924,0.010920648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993131,0.0002490659,0.000014712129,0.00008783552,0.00010511272,0.00023023236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912304,0.0003088193,0.00017090686,0.00009905726,0.00014608238,0.0001519822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009447388,0.00016159248,0.00038113512,0.0003082114,0.00038420217,0.0010486022,0.00061205623,0.0023749562,0.0063868705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004809545,0.00012174477,0.0003855972,0.00047205234,0.0016593735,0.0018651249,0.0006909697,0.0015917532,0.00046101923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033210142,0.00035573196,0.0077511054,0.0005883501,0.00010939643,0.00023325934,0.0006859869,0.0033994229,0.0010273163,0.8030268,0.038214717,0.14427587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043812802,0.00023159296,0.047785033,0.0017946732,0.0001333396,0.00044890304,0.0018588892,0.0036061397,0.0012236595,0.5740206,0.36841974,0.00003933141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010380523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009761906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010380523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024029275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003165284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021366239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104685344","doi":"","title":"Assortative Marriage and the Effects of Government Homecare Subsidy Programs on Gender Wage and Participation Inequality","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Economics; Inequality; Government (linguistics); Labour economics; Wage inequality; Wage; Affect (linguistics); Gender inequality; Demographic economics; Psychology; Market economy","score_opus":0.010849798151074352,"score_gpt":0.2701046601276462,"score_spread":0.2592548619765719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104685344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97685266,0.0002921799,0.0059212013,0.0018495843,0.00002114561,0.000035684086,0.00010804462,0.000011481011,0.014908012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849105,0.00010694186,0.0002315776,0.00007953925,0.000008451173,0.000012275973,0.000008985714,0.000001154346,0.0010599534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896216,0.00059217226,0.000017999371,0.0000631068,0.00006260018,0.00030198536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966182,0.0019785922,0.00077042385,0.0001584743,0.000094846706,0.00037949646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018579713,0.00025854915,0.0005212004,0.00036925418,0.0009895666,0.0010305871,0.000501894,0.0010147082,0.010524745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006587363,0.00015287456,0.00042757316,0.00033792292,0.0014809495,0.0008285527,0.0015542278,0.0007795373,0.00028805062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002032226,0.0019314607,0.22002245,0.00014505288,0.00027728511,0.0018516452,0.0034474612,0.07846313,0.0038186088,0.60705334,0.0030269772,0.07793039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006436074,0.0016202392,0.28518438,0.00013922167,0.0003986427,0.00070488465,0.0066277618,0.23426384,0.001531594,0.46116555,0.007641416,0.000078839665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007816998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009473423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010524745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012693759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073912623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03520882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104833616","doi":"","title":"DETERMINING GENERAL AND SPECIFIC PURPOSE TRANSFERS: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equalization (audio); Revenue; Economics; Econometrics; Panel data; Transfer (computing); Fiscal capacity; Computer science; Public economics; Operations research; Engineering; Telecommunications; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.06261385318240192,"score_gpt":0.3326659566197382,"score_spread":0.27005210343733627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104833616","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15332955,0.00022278247,0.7766606,0.00018826121,0.000045104764,0.0004802094,0.00096073025,0.00055083696,0.06756188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7430585,0.00039752098,0.24255419,0.000084630075,0.0000340539,0.0004082834,0.0011868842,0.00020712799,0.0120688295],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977869,0.0005927014,0.0001017117,0.00029978724,0.000927957,0.00029090646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800426,0.0006657705,0.00021950614,0.00040594413,0.00065125036,0.00005328183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002705725,0.00051712134,0.0010153499,0.0037322307,0.0005516173,0.0021007282,0.0017472161,0.00080183946,0.011200337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010031323,0.00051952293,0.0009865434,0.004997898,0.0006017321,0.0025865887,0.0024445332,0.0010483285,0.0009421895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002482678,0.0005895149,0.045686353,0.00032655295,0.00047769924,0.00027962524,0.0008949565,0.28838423,0.002691308,0.27463317,0.003177957,0.38261038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005567818,0.0003338051,0.07951326,0.0002343415,0.000446503,0.00025123052,0.0014834474,0.6186882,0.0064465245,0.26919362,0.02321765,0.00013565194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013095666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013779798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013095666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019330721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023947412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03746885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105972217","doi":"10.7202/012856ar","title":"La division sexuée du travail professionnel et domestique : quelques remarques pour une perspective temporelle","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Lien social et Politiques","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0254488774222229,"score_gpt":0.3428880648306511,"score_spread":0.3174391874084282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105972217","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.125891,0.23009439,0.03178102,0.39961243,0.0047064833,0.00008745742,0.00043253438,0.00009134865,0.20730336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84023756,0.081127375,0.008803413,0.021293059,0.0037945989,0.00022862793,0.00014911621,0.00009300456,0.044273276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678,0.0016522178,0.000096219504,0.0006299052,0.000361456,0.00048020692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99453753,0.0033541783,0.0005311475,0.00044778324,0.0006844987,0.00044480475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060488633,0.00066158397,0.0007723185,0.0024739713,0.0045182994,0.011837498,0.0016076901,0.0039803283,0.008619136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055110846,0.0002637058,0.00075145066,0.0024422063,0.02441214,0.01530596,0.0036036286,0.006038606,0.00072157034],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008029039,0.00005432393,0.0072564236,0.00048505602,0.00003943818,0.0002844723,0.06856829,0.00036399034,0.00086328946,0.86705655,0.0050658463,0.04988209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020979078,0.00013327147,0.021516113,0.0021763702,0.000043007327,0.0005771101,0.14301096,0.00061451975,0.0010032243,0.4496942,0.38110793,0.00010228096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024395525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03390575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024395525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006165628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005934334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048507035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106652671","doi":"10.3138/cpp.33.2.227","title":"Welfare Reforms and Consumption among Single Mother Households: Evidence from Canadian Provinces","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Consumption (sociology); Propensity score matching; Demographic economics; Single mothers; Matching (statistics); Demography; Economics; Population; Welfare reform; Difference in differences; Geography; Socioeconomics; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Econometrics","score_opus":0.039062150096174815,"score_gpt":0.2734722811349088,"score_spread":0.23441013103873398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106652671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.980135,0.0024402407,0.00008817896,0.0013143432,0.000018605288,0.00004042856,0.006312982,0.0000086135515,0.009641629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936733,0.0024370651,0.00009278071,0.00014931176,0.0000066959333,0.000016190388,0.0019727214,0.0000057435805,0.0016461175],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977754,0.00015574413,0.00010117727,0.00021817244,0.00078500144,0.0009643991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927246,0.0005752276,0.0019651682,0.00040171153,0.0033831843,0.0009501581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014428529,0.00027746902,0.00073717354,0.002466888,0.004517823,0.0015500129,0.0012350243,0.00041717596,0.0037662042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006096776,0.00041492181,0.0007378303,0.010045619,0.0013012877,0.0004504796,0.0012157722,0.00058747886,0.00023594362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027547395,0.00004961513,0.9753905,0.00014633952,0.00016744436,0.00017963696,0.0043767462,0.00029200368,0.00015709075,0.0008947676,0.0037448022,0.014325596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012135081,0.000012477486,0.9942596,0.00005634977,0.000045630823,0.000022066026,0.0025979958,0.00009285803,0.00005832226,0.00003324256,0.002798765,0.000010742303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042183038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042183038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050393768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3060608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106923500","doi":"10.25336/p67g9d","title":"The Effect of Education on Early Parenthood among Young Canadian Adults","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Hazard; Psychology; Demographic economics; Educational attainment; Demography; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.01481880711432826,"score_gpt":0.3006331116900097,"score_spread":0.28581430457568147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106923500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865948,0.0022881376,0.00011098179,0.0012892646,0.000041595275,0.00003025434,0.0041385274,0.000015179375,0.0054913284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965166,0.0010850746,0.00011482441,0.000075139054,0.000009162063,0.000007928598,0.00097452453,0.0000030977026,0.0012137392],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861073,0.00017156222,0.00005553601,0.00013387669,0.00038772397,0.0006404375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597234,0.0005946819,0.00089922786,0.00014522589,0.00085729914,0.0015311926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011722596,0.00034026193,0.00038353284,0.0016610206,0.002513391,0.0011573039,0.000940882,0.00056442205,0.0033101488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062487014,0.00019614243,0.0010141438,0.0024403494,0.0007358726,0.00042490548,0.0010740556,0.001069383,0.00019194398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009840417,0.00004385585,0.9918686,0.000019697038,0.000058793445,0.00007893247,0.0005339947,0.0001135607,0.0000403203,0.00028038086,0.0008015404,0.0060619707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034410637,0.000024059627,0.9983498,0.000030659223,0.000028087006,0.000025535443,0.000692037,0.00013830369,0.000019051982,0.000043990953,0.00063929905,0.0000056980207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9917099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99549943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015181861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015181861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022931015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11015266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107558897","doi":"10.1007/s13524-012-0124-x","title":"Panel Conditioning in Longitudinal Studies: Evidence From Labor Force Items in the Current Population Survey","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; York University; University of Minnesota; University of Wisconsin-Madison; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Current Population Survey; Attrition; Unemployment; Demographic economics; Survey data collection; Survey research; Panel data; Population; Panel survey; Psychology; British Household Panel Survey; Economics; Econometrics; Demography; Statistics; Medicine; Sociology; Mathematics; Applied psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.1617028587789282,"score_gpt":0.382987064569149,"score_spread":0.2212842057902208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107558897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8820674,0.046590477,0.037343152,0.008955187,0.0008695767,0.00069793494,0.0054022684,0.00015209637,0.017921984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984672,0.0046669343,0.003995973,0.0026013143,0.00035144648,0.00023580939,0.0024356397,0.000058921265,0.0009820544],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8521127,0.10856181,0.008346229,0.013904309,0.014106988,0.0029679812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.33385473,0.4568017,0.11118732,0.080168776,0.015343585,0.0026439403],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16953601,0.0006991483,0.0012462301,0.0023633814,0.0019565867,0.0029230106,0.0024161313,0.002414035,0.006497965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39416316,0.0010158288,0.0032506862,0.0053980965,0.004636242,0.0029282642,0.004196778,0.002586793,0.0009110412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040712135,0.000082821985,0.9767662,0.0002396538,0.00247606,0.00007162315,0.0015773363,0.0003301971,0.00005394101,0.0014326271,0.00088325207,0.015679276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008112614,0.0004515662,0.97950375,0.0009687823,0.0028814976,0.00019497932,0.0016233949,0.001599386,0.0005513692,0.0036217,0.00845684,0.00006567752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025678432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020304866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.830464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010212146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017586824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8966028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107917899","doi":"10.1007/s11113-008-9125-2","title":"The Demographic Foundations of Rising Employment and Earnings among Single Mothers in Canada and the United States, 1980–2000","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Population Research and Policy Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Ministry of Labour; Statistics Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Baby boom; Earnings; Demographic economics; Welfare; Economics; Single mothers; Population; Welfare state; Demographic change; Boom; Cohort; Developed country; Demography; Labour economics; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.06548275993126319,"score_gpt":0.38482140679060584,"score_spread":0.31933864685934266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107917899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9512636,0.025476353,0.00013126295,0.009416737,0.000118942975,0.0000322345,0.0061478983,0.000011800638,0.0074011628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98316574,0.013671646,0.00010107553,0.00041431913,0.000049173163,0.000011036241,0.0012741456,0.0000030264775,0.0013097302],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942195,0.00005112069,0.00003545852,0.000050336388,0.0001605498,0.0002805047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975327,0.00023296561,0.000490698,0.00004539506,0.0011898646,0.00050843623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012960297,0.00012530848,0.00024529183,0.002322379,0.001957423,0.0014067568,0.000946441,0.0005796308,0.0014085887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037551033,0.00018068733,0.00033595317,0.00491583,0.0011699487,0.0005621012,0.00077328103,0.0009029756,0.00008929508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014269243,0.000054917215,0.9570859,0.00015148011,0.00008550216,0.00020461998,0.002291161,0.00034496593,0.00015339322,0.0022497375,0.0040574516,0.03317809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003137487,0.0000064113165,0.99352115,0.000069644615,0.00002166033,0.000031560678,0.0032516567,0.00009425828,0.000046568057,0.00014033276,0.002808026,0.0000055678743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9880464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023249472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023249472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051835753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16868752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108037574","doi":"10.7202/013472ar","title":"Les transferts ascendants au Bangladesh, une décision familiale?","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.0450104751405972,"score_gpt":0.2797997487527308,"score_spread":0.2347892736121336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108037574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9355277,0.0021332894,0.0009892166,0.015757808,0.0001028776,0.000043259115,0.00022308131,0.000012707839,0.045210227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98666567,0.001487568,0.00024989777,0.0003804114,0.00002503836,0.000021309219,0.000038634025,0.0000048210004,0.011126605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985007,0.0007530772,0.000057386213,0.00012602637,0.00014320902,0.00041959173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982887,0.0005587898,0.0003677005,0.00008741681,0.0002391946,0.00045813093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016632228,0.0002565188,0.00027111583,0.00068195054,0.004059652,0.0023335468,0.0005281385,0.00097278116,0.016356062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060598017,0.00018746161,0.00015977978,0.0010359496,0.002158799,0.002072609,0.0018339377,0.00081072445,0.0011188346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077625475,0.00034185027,0.35764316,0.00037401138,0.00010413185,0.0112121,0.29554936,0.0015947632,0.0036541643,0.08280595,0.01339512,0.2325492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004075254,0.00041897522,0.20277722,0.0005821601,0.00004732095,0.0016323455,0.6519509,0.00046060013,0.00091592234,0.020049095,0.121053435,0.00007130268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056388587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09346525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056388587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004481161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033240106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11212075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108150068","doi":"10.7202/008998ar","title":"La reproduction des populations autochtones du Canada : exogamie, fécondité et mobilité ethnique","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.022484712886068205,"score_gpt":0.27151940000998376,"score_spread":0.24903468712391555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108150068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903874,0.0003303457,0.0001544882,0.00027403684,0.000003950114,0.0000080541595,0.00008011211,0.000002674563,0.0087589985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995184,0.0003358476,0.000109237866,0.00003082477,0.0000017854535,0.0000046218834,0.00003211094,0.0000020768466,0.004299598],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994024,0.000121365316,0.000007623231,0.00006758071,0.00014663136,0.00025440243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992397,0.00021087912,0.00010320211,0.000048142883,0.00024614047,0.00015201053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006492395,0.00018399305,0.00022235763,0.0010364095,0.005105526,0.0014953271,0.00058363716,0.00022044551,0.004999532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012247306,0.000105792526,0.00011683865,0.0014909344,0.0028798045,0.00037495163,0.0012592616,0.00032045558,0.000096850905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024858167,0.00009135713,0.56042,0.00016170605,0.000073044794,0.0012393604,0.22822927,0.0012118578,0.0080825705,0.040177833,0.0025208422,0.15754355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011306665,0.00009238566,0.8065387,0.00009207341,0.000034095796,0.00034327595,0.1580255,0.0006953927,0.001475365,0.0020752465,0.030567294,0.000049367263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96725625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032743752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020431828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017867096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14824402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108722879","doi":"10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00410.x","title":"Fiscal Externalities of Becoming a Parent","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Population and Development Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Employment and Social Development Canada","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Externality; Economics; Population; Homogeneous; Argument (complex analysis); Demographic economics; Public economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Demography","score_opus":0.13761261029409116,"score_gpt":0.3407707818473888,"score_spread":0.20315817155329763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108722879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9181476,0.0042681294,0.0016099128,0.0020141834,0.000056940175,0.00002956376,0.00092634273,0.00001454575,0.072932854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917024,0.0032243715,0.00031793842,0.00016350092,0.000031668307,0.000010352327,0.0003992927,0.0000042088072,0.004146327],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996093,0.00014297671,0.000027450375,0.00003724577,0.000089652676,0.00009345039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984971,0.00044217825,0.00061134883,0.0000816482,0.00018722855,0.00018051102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091634167,0.0001497487,0.00017360869,0.0008955691,0.00042174893,0.00081363827,0.00020060074,0.00026144818,0.004689183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035605088,0.000103978666,0.00038137895,0.000887462,0.00047571553,0.0006788083,0.0010838711,0.0005874735,0.00019085628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048560585,0.00025880296,0.7344496,0.00029311207,0.00028894175,0.0019338904,0.0020592734,0.016959412,0.0008207508,0.09860219,0.004932782,0.13891566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002540578,0.00020596894,0.8988684,0.00035646188,0.0001847798,0.0033366906,0.0051412503,0.0029750448,0.00074680394,0.036476493,0.051644176,0.00003856991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012141484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014507915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012141484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017175245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090959703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02414167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109440569","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2009.01538.x","title":"Income splitting, specialization, and intra‐family distribution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Labour supply; Economics; Labour economics; Welfare; Term (time); Distribution (mathematics); Control (management); Inequality; Market economy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06393182920068309,"score_gpt":0.20415173597469605,"score_spread":0.14021990677401297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109440569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99228656,0.00009730205,0.00070345757,0.00019712451,0.0000020279292,0.0000039099054,0.000037344766,0.0000026000494,0.0066697085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960715,0.00002077383,0.00003245109,0.0000064456153,0.0000013100421,8.141073e-7,0.000008462815,4.7089338e-7,0.0003222149],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997055,0.00009540847,0.0000077649765,0.00003722354,0.000043975393,0.000110092245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998401,0.0006515366,0.00037586188,0.00012184484,0.00011382343,0.00033595852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067153317,0.00012429515,0.00022668431,0.00059588335,0.0005350013,0.00074586226,0.0002835147,0.00024481028,0.01048081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020495895,0.00008982904,0.00018131865,0.0005188395,0.0011243048,0.0005663365,0.0009921654,0.0003033046,0.00031527545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034696123,0.00028244357,0.8787158,0.000037868056,0.000092865936,0.0008199616,0.002725125,0.010507291,0.0031256604,0.060639966,0.0014004051,0.04130559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041804662,0.00016333241,0.90060127,0.00006333535,0.000047395653,0.0006767036,0.007824543,0.01360691,0.00081417523,0.07277118,0.0033688876,0.000020649622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006058059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006680674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01048081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072330085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029857582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035061836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109718882","doi":"10.1111/0008-4085.00023","title":"Employment and child‐care choices in Canada and the United States","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Sociology; Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Welfare economics; Economics; Medicine; Nursing; Art","score_opus":0.04510013984159392,"score_gpt":0.18212744733791242,"score_spread":0.1370273074963185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109718882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849663,0.0021537584,0.00017982484,0.00087846897,0.000022428692,0.000023674289,0.0049005155,0.000010957027,0.006864257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99104136,0.0017009132,0.00027758913,0.0002156424,0.000007027021,0.000023044628,0.0030482695,0.00000831859,0.0036779128],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987984,0.00012017213,0.00003498876,0.00013396853,0.0003853173,0.00052712084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853134,0.0001919581,0.00027005086,0.000051447943,0.0005327828,0.00042235837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009741919,0.0003274113,0.0006621223,0.0019280867,0.0028894078,0.0017998762,0.0007077644,0.00044450597,0.0029356105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030924573,0.00023753062,0.0006705745,0.0067588077,0.0008001553,0.0004435092,0.0010277672,0.00054265157,0.00023012901],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017172753,0.00005630742,0.961853,0.00005746433,0.00021989016,0.0002503341,0.004788119,0.0015612822,0.00016642483,0.0027965219,0.0041900775,0.023888776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012179432,0.000016506043,0.9884455,0.000070536924,0.000042992342,0.00004015556,0.0048200414,0.0005176658,0.00007075643,0.000256797,0.005684756,0.000021974492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99650156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99827206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0284594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0284594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028610954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20648837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109820501","doi":"10.3386/w10186","title":"Stressed Out on Four Continents: Time Crunch or Yuppie Kvetch?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Crunch; Geology; Climatology; Biology","score_opus":0.4137800165164997,"score_gpt":0.5226222846885459,"score_spread":0.10884226817204617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109820501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6338994,0.005289161,0.00027255117,0.27531564,0.00168569,0.000036353966,0.0027148365,0.000039526712,0.08074698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8982993,0.0054891636,0.00019148257,0.02714374,0.00070559897,0.000065964785,0.0011273823,0.000044965505,0.06693252],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961144,0.00009157931,0.000022062406,0.00003641287,0.000067177956,0.00017132192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887556,0.00022466895,0.00027717047,0.00006193115,0.00022665251,0.00033403345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066280225,0.00023598997,0.00023474068,0.00082198833,0.0041214996,0.0012502279,0.00032441452,0.0010439234,0.010633095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002280632,0.00015638654,0.00016771142,0.0015619232,0.0015587906,0.0017676885,0.001532647,0.0014458589,0.0007812045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121162055,0.00006136764,0.21016373,0.0002658264,0.000028889906,0.0028890788,0.19626305,0.000058442703,0.0008461391,0.016029842,0.5140728,0.05919966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067430556,0.00003303461,0.26092145,0.00026524242,0.00001021736,0.0009128907,0.48499477,0.000039775285,0.00019065228,0.0013484331,0.2512455,0.000031339932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09083717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18008873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09083717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013103468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013006112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18061692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110812423","doi":"10.1007/bf03404006","title":"Welfare Reforms and the Cognitive Development of Young Children","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Public Health","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Poverty; Welfare; Household income; Psychology; Cognitive development; Cognition; Bivariate analysis; Family income; Multivariate analysis; Unemployment; Demographic economics; Child development; Developmental psychology; Economics; Economic growth; Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.029906412346064382,"score_gpt":0.2836723722289516,"score_spread":0.2537659598828872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110812423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900169,0.00071563054,0.000014327529,0.001585907,0.000016676606,0.0000071025443,0.00015030947,0.0000027011126,0.0074905693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982346,0.0005170568,0.000020107997,0.00009358051,0.0000073443953,0.0000062161353,0.00004592261,0.0000014558103,0.0010736648],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998635,0.00021914794,0.0000394163,0.0000475135,0.00018559863,0.00087327335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971312,0.00049761403,0.00078336545,0.00007620519,0.0005930875,0.000918591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011814659,0.00019715814,0.00029387252,0.0011948837,0.0024387375,0.0032145218,0.00067013426,0.0008336294,0.0035627359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062412294,0.00015968017,0.00037925513,0.0014628314,0.001845779,0.0008672118,0.0015957846,0.0012732731,0.00025555966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026205566,0.0009828873,0.8526394,0.00010825881,0.00005692246,0.0018410783,0.079669885,0.00044341004,0.0006321281,0.015970673,0.0038505972,0.043542784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018253986,0.00013636024,0.9415828,0.00008517726,0.000024437926,0.00018553322,0.048879888,0.00010459928,0.00026673783,0.0015977507,0.007100935,0.000017490567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27720216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36636633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7227979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052431948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00802207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5511773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110815999","doi":"10.1177/0894318409344765","title":"Theorizing Family","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Nursing Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0228561047500061,"score_gpt":0.3094319232765503,"score_spread":0.2865758185265442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110815999","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043301224,0.00504572,0.0015366885,0.88765776,0.002772769,0.000010656722,0.000024422856,0.000009770842,0.09861219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56439734,0.008798446,0.0017439631,0.36251613,0.007318698,0.0002031486,0.000043214815,0.00004634505,0.054932773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582565,0.002797696,0.00008453395,0.00045459726,0.00046704637,0.00037056167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99149317,0.006277111,0.0003034394,0.00051561446,0.00059730955,0.00081342313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009958152,0.00040279672,0.00056119915,0.000943275,0.011463365,0.0061017047,0.0020572296,0.014123577,0.009608291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015386082,0.0002992064,0.0005291672,0.0006702774,0.05505936,0.0153735755,0.0056552435,0.01797125,0.00087360153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006978468,0.000013966182,0.00030683086,0.000014151634,0.000002839175,0.000090179725,0.007860566,0.00008015872,0.000009606463,0.9388126,0.04922285,0.0035791467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014300677,0.000008047155,0.00031206326,0.00020664478,0.000004568653,0.000093473034,0.015519953,0.00018036671,0.000029684128,0.81574374,0.16787794,0.000009177351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019956155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036772512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019956155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009926554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008490985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07202256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112681396","doi":"","title":"THREE ESSAYS ON INCOME AND WEALTH","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Public economics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.015538556965250196,"score_gpt":0.24264751873877793,"score_spread":0.22710896177352774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112681396","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021184241,0.120835826,0.0311418,0.48380262,0.07330677,0.00026509975,0.0015779564,0.00043285862,0.26745287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24628785,0.11356058,0.027277501,0.100999296,0.116577305,0.0009080096,0.002088174,0.0007615228,0.3915398],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817216,0.0006473572,0.00011818819,0.00024012245,0.0006964643,0.0001257495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98175013,0.013535287,0.0008799951,0.00073307194,0.0024812752,0.00062036613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003147165,0.0009037744,0.0005819971,0.0019416421,0.0021356978,0.0046055526,0.0008098234,0.0018140321,0.010508728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020541502,0.0003653249,0.0007717983,0.0019530042,0.0040985784,0.0040567704,0.0016314082,0.004283528,0.0027668418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008143586,0.000121139514,0.003215279,0.0004966701,0.000049002887,0.00009300392,0.0022674066,0.0007906018,0.0003467984,0.18545295,0.68904054,0.118045196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017233408,0.00008043387,0.0061002467,0.0012569352,0.000023793855,0.00012769116,0.0016412806,0.00076219015,0.000350773,0.06704742,0.922545,0.000046964833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017561478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018033852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010508728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022429577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012607859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035155177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114199029","doi":"10.1257/jep.21.2.27","title":"Marriage and Divorce: Changes and their Driving Forces","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic Perspectives","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":796,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remarriage; Cohabitation; Fertility; Demographic economics; Economics; Falling (accident); Marriage market; Birth control; Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Population; Family planning; Geography; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.01658257215021227,"score_gpt":0.27368597506282294,"score_spread":0.2571034029126107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114199029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8832016,0.043236665,0.0013992573,0.0470957,0.0004789651,0.00003417407,0.0019733594,0.00003553148,0.022544755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97719234,0.018562092,0.0002745427,0.0011674659,0.00034576078,0.00001536529,0.00050011557,0.000011337416,0.0019309417],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925786,0.00021006202,0.000061883286,0.00015198502,0.00016174973,0.00015631742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974564,0.0007503908,0.0010380902,0.00009030881,0.000233004,0.0004318421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014987326,0.00013462744,0.00024868516,0.0020463404,0.0013188532,0.0019201629,0.00042170653,0.0007110483,0.008521587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060941125,0.00017837281,0.0003232275,0.0034812961,0.0014884518,0.0020234655,0.0018306483,0.0014928585,0.00051838375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007863632,0.000095370626,0.811152,0.00020097081,0.00009418504,0.0005340983,0.0146819,0.00036406628,0.00017746439,0.06519737,0.0064869965,0.10093694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073224573,0.000071045004,0.89807945,0.0003341334,0.00005184891,0.0004742722,0.025753332,0.00052910607,0.00017366374,0.01611345,0.058370892,0.000041380314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032699715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037036106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032699715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001438538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012457364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06501871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114726073","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.296921","title":"Caring and Sharing: Tests between Alternative Models of Intra-Household Allocation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.046415045092264365,"score_gpt":0.27573879604185403,"score_spread":0.22932375094958968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114726073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560495,0.00042596264,0.024778647,0.0026959463,0.0001648575,0.00035198368,0.0006399728,0.00009427957,0.014798843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931579,0.00023471314,0.0034512116,0.00021702325,0.0001284395,0.00023747761,0.00031362535,0.000032801065,0.0022268358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97706807,0.017583264,0.0006617003,0.0023165098,0.0008331708,0.0015372909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.535592,0.43703225,0.011642998,0.009512577,0.0026484597,0.0035717606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049784813,0.0022125968,0.0033734418,0.0011618088,0.002119126,0.0067641265,0.008686331,0.0053739725,0.03993532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16292624,0.0009960529,0.003979128,0.001647798,0.006663993,0.0099443495,0.0054303007,0.0039398866,0.0018842339],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05725038,0.010973974,0.15955773,0.002021013,0.005420716,0.0012075912,0.020126529,0.1006162,0.0017136328,0.53973156,0.007521836,0.09385878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063438155,0.006624016,0.07374617,0.0002918113,0.0032587016,0.00044097545,0.016704857,0.58370507,0.0009795548,0.30432191,0.0032523787,0.00033072257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012642276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006461206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049784813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003593169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00359899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2632904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115645139","doi":"10.1177/0734371x11428616","title":"Pay Equity in the States","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Public Personnel Administration","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pay Equity; Equity (law); Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Public sector; Gender pay gap; Economics; Panel data; State (computer science); Private sector; Labour economics; Political science; Wage; Economic growth; Econometrics; Law","score_opus":0.13865380976857575,"score_gpt":0.3757645020480285,"score_spread":0.23711069227945278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115645139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7607656,0.03259368,0.0012204584,0.018321663,0.00038081975,0.000030214213,0.0007106163,0.00002375212,0.18595318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99533844,0.0018687785,0.000058604506,0.00043869918,0.000058213023,0.000005540089,0.000072752686,0.0000017781275,0.0021571289],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991027,0.00023320215,0.000033420518,0.00011257395,0.00021316543,0.0003048324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902403,0.00028326156,0.0002883505,0.000048867532,0.0001737553,0.00018179225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011237384,0.00008266647,0.00018018839,0.0015544868,0.0009296439,0.00201879,0.00026243215,0.00047544035,0.00649932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032434715,0.00008221875,0.00022148162,0.0022435712,0.00087829353,0.00091258244,0.0011130902,0.0006338001,0.00019732419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001627818,0.00016388102,0.37781247,0.00022226518,0.00011779,0.00018754609,0.005333177,0.0010956218,0.00045271622,0.32353926,0.01278328,0.27812922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012488147,0.0001500376,0.8609398,0.00056635967,0.000038719234,0.00025652218,0.007476173,0.0005840559,0.00028663088,0.03929696,0.09037153,0.000020843365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016533518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0201881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016533518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020017703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015364498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032874584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115687927","doi":"10.18740/s42k57","title":"Feminist Mothering: Challenging Gender Inequality by Resisting the Institution of Motherhood and Raising Children to be Critical Agents of Social Change.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Gender studies; Sociology; Feminism; Institution; Resistance (ecology); Feminist philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.18094021086358777,"score_gpt":0.4101433897189013,"score_spread":0.22920317885531352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115687927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19972333,0.030900918,0.016240586,0.2795695,0.0019095073,0.00006339607,0.00006113555,0.00008386402,0.47144783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969198,0.0042806957,0.002084547,0.007852824,0.00039312788,0.00007093609,0.000010809806,0.00004044203,0.01606863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943297,0.0044565904,0.000053050884,0.0003148896,0.00035293988,0.0004927196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957222,0.0030909267,0.00044327741,0.00023631183,0.00014757022,0.00035980882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072933785,0.00044669333,0.0003234069,0.0007229976,0.009909416,0.0067937854,0.0009624542,0.002600558,0.0036659755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005929824,0.00018922151,0.0001721267,0.00048987137,0.053478055,0.006875411,0.008394735,0.0038175792,0.00026585287],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001888371,0.000014844682,0.0008145044,0.000064111206,0.0000044189123,0.00029767302,0.22258034,0.000054206976,0.00032758448,0.7518879,0.007294141,0.01664139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002051567,0.000051685805,0.0016116519,0.0005671378,0.000009461942,0.0006205607,0.25245577,0.00017657143,0.0010889242,0.3521795,0.39120162,0.000016701566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025107577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053896112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009909416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003457241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034340774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038571477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116675714","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Income Support Programs on Labour Market Behaviour in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Entitlement (fair division); Income Support; Government (linguistics); Labour economics; Unemployment; Economics; Business; Demographic economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.0132115234321159,"score_gpt":0.28061848268681283,"score_spread":0.26740695925469693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116675714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924779,0.0003252391,0.00012849923,0.001279607,0.000009396943,0.00003091196,0.0026361095,0.000018483106,0.0030938508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965893,0.00030954098,0.0001652897,0.00010861465,0.0000031948532,0.000013796127,0.00123267,0.0000049971795,0.0015726341],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984798,0.000268908,0.000036592224,0.00011473112,0.00043456437,0.00066552643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976387,0.00054116175,0.0003611972,0.00009147357,0.0006801024,0.00068732165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011555876,0.0002446542,0.00043247457,0.0010018827,0.0024632227,0.0012049214,0.0010532556,0.00046175218,0.0028259594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049953284,0.00018701992,0.00049538247,0.0019507061,0.00073930377,0.00033528652,0.0009949688,0.0008787141,0.00017254573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006472246,0.0003772111,0.9127136,0.00009720955,0.00022725725,0.0002489317,0.0026904615,0.010369211,0.00056152244,0.0029907236,0.008327471,0.060749236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031129053,0.000063593754,0.9884213,0.000031945456,0.000041477844,0.000019369027,0.0018527241,0.006326936,0.00016015409,0.00023560418,0.0027925547,0.000023305693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99659604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99769455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05193862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05193862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043634105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37684286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116802228","doi":"10.1007/s12114-012-9144-4","title":"Wealth Affirming Policies for Women of Color","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Black Political Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Asset (computer security); Focus (optics); Joint (building); Basic income; Financial stability; Low income; Business; Economics; Public economics; Demographic economics; Financial system; Market economy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.03757432133061691,"score_gpt":0.34378278768204057,"score_spread":0.3062084663514237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116802228","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10696546,0.048240785,0.00383365,0.51504034,0.0059854356,0.00019565613,0.00028095048,0.00017339594,0.3192844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70408136,0.03381809,0.004959394,0.15132663,0.0020863255,0.00043650638,0.0001571315,0.00006276709,0.103071794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897027,0.0003210838,0.00001921195,0.000055326112,0.00016808104,0.00046607238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984314,0.0004576728,0.00024400535,0.00007411076,0.00024644734,0.00054632296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025067194,0.000342965,0.00019207396,0.00083796267,0.003129153,0.0016946509,0.00083912036,0.0023151492,0.010295816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00469393,0.000113422626,0.0003695861,0.00045488903,0.002003791,0.0015863156,0.0043407,0.0020622557,0.00048142506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052692827,0.00034562554,0.010762375,0.0010460623,0.000043817614,0.00078961684,0.016713753,0.00058074796,0.0025033366,0.47419643,0.16941619,0.3235494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053977135,0.0001213019,0.01862198,0.0032132184,0.000055142038,0.0003188757,0.01614702,0.00023407703,0.0011742865,0.04874523,0.9112845,0.00003045796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026669163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056686673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026669163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025333778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011096246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05302787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118017052","doi":"10.7201/earn.2006.11.05","title":"Distribución de bienestar económico entre Estados Miembros ante distintas opciones de desacoplamiento en el marco de la nueva PAC - Consecuencias para España","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Decoupling (probability); Welfare economics; Economics; Welfare; Partial equilibrium; Member states; Dilemma; Microeconomics; General equilibrium theory; International economics; European union; Market economy; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.01915982113225727,"score_gpt":0.2866791813888335,"score_spread":0.26751936025657624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118017052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900564,0.00021312103,0.00038030557,0.00023064323,0.0000054259267,0.0000041754734,0.00024480443,0.0000072012076,0.008858044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99517787,0.00022687203,0.00031895348,0.000030433837,0.0000038130179,0.000006591383,0.00020240032,0.000004079123,0.0040289303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974173,0.000046605855,0.000009382657,0.000056342073,0.0000500547,0.00009588434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992866,0.0002757387,0.00015315195,0.000057607464,0.00014921294,0.00007763902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013423138,0.00015132448,0.00026082675,0.00063836895,0.00034230325,0.0015180071,0.00030499866,0.0006321423,0.0043094596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021149747,0.00011082233,0.00029302982,0.00078851084,0.0005109332,0.0008026735,0.0008036462,0.0004409134,0.00029951124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044436473,0.00024406963,0.78264797,0.00017568462,0.00023826913,0.0012098863,0.0062950733,0.023673609,0.011464454,0.05223982,0.0026841117,0.11468337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006366619,0.000352567,0.94299793,0.00008727227,0.00016953818,0.00024116831,0.007804482,0.015200863,0.00233093,0.013473596,0.017235328,0.000042628417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025932409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04275036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025932409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019778598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058364053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051562905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118721154","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1279674","title":"Dynamic Labour Supply Effects of Childcare Subsidies: Evidence from a Canadian Natural Experiment on Low-Fee Universal Child Care","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Natural experiment; Subsidy; Labour economics; Labour supply; Economics; Business; Child care; Demographic economics; Medicine; Market economy; Nursing","score_opus":0.004194115574359449,"score_gpt":0.2290283347420449,"score_spread":0.22483421916768545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118721154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860721,0.0004532722,0.00044969848,0.0011774355,0.000025548175,0.0002333784,0.0018394837,0.00002325123,0.009725932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914978,0.0003388269,0.00042290404,0.00041833756,0.000013219526,0.00012810856,0.0007140567,0.0000127827925,0.0064539523],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680966,0.0011507457,0.00006505717,0.0004127423,0.00050633115,0.0010554922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829259,0.009997194,0.0026564784,0.001612467,0.0013688509,0.0014391353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054097036,0.00054864574,0.0011411275,0.00066451955,0.004702292,0.0016704847,0.0019478693,0.0016899237,0.01076692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014341383,0.0004856794,0.0006789057,0.0018073149,0.00386178,0.0009663753,0.0012921263,0.0015811514,0.0006962771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05065404,0.036607046,0.6562092,0.0012963216,0.0018660082,0.0014758996,0.02499072,0.02184978,0.015669888,0.047937136,0.033336,0.108107984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033958436,0.002029884,0.95477474,0.00012774541,0.00043960483,0.000049906026,0.00953653,0.0044378727,0.0011885733,0.005374035,0.018455453,0.00018971306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9740984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9860556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029866112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029866112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029417835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21669483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118964805","doi":"10.25336/p6bs5x","title":"The changing impact of conjugal status and motherhood on employment across generations of Canadian women","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"General Social Survey; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Demography; Sociology; Gender studies; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.053901059833217246,"score_gpt":0.3584983415059613,"score_spread":0.3045972816727441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118964805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969926,0.00051466486,0.000045926838,0.00018935223,0.000005059394,0.000010114644,0.00080607034,0.0000024984722,0.001433612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983789,0.00044636993,0.000113489885,0.000029844323,0.00000270174,0.000005711527,0.0004919983,0.0000021427504,0.00052895077],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989556,0.00014628777,0.00003305062,0.0001545011,0.0002770323,0.00043344643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796355,0.00032408044,0.00042873228,0.00013876215,0.0006657796,0.00047911835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012920753,0.0002672144,0.00034126267,0.0026889353,0.0040023,0.0015311205,0.0012590417,0.00039743545,0.0020475793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050052926,0.00032971016,0.00048677318,0.0044986894,0.0011056956,0.0004993163,0.0015262308,0.0005055296,0.00013294682],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007066398,0.000021066378,0.98268014,0.000018768587,0.00004306542,0.000106850945,0.0058629867,0.00011622266,0.00019148743,0.00032284658,0.0003081223,0.010257819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012804962,0.000009645283,0.9966461,0.000012087147,0.0000096061685,0.00002661716,0.0025697548,0.000087851084,0.000027862612,0.000028209173,0.0005738668,0.0000070997535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9897731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99554366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0170539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0170539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01722007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12373531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119055680","doi":"10.1086/587760","title":"Child‐Care Policy and the Labor Supply of Mothers with Young Children: A Natural Experiment from Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":384,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Natural experiment; Government (linguistics); Demographic economics; Economics; Labour economics; Day care; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.004662708707808862,"score_gpt":0.21178380504913255,"score_spread":0.2071210963413237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119055680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958437,0.00012505038,0.00009021011,0.0003745629,0.0000139466865,0.00026516526,0.0012380171,0.0000064172095,0.002043042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890821,0.00032928234,0.0005782439,0.00046162272,0.000017519711,0.0005095073,0.0017022325,0.000008725367,0.007310776],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691486,0.00088404916,0.000059113812,0.0003117452,0.00059483293,0.0012354174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99402785,0.0019876128,0.00090015604,0.00040874686,0.0014239434,0.0012516836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002900553,0.00069238164,0.00079342094,0.0010032835,0.0077338214,0.0018039416,0.001974539,0.0013186642,0.003917908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004925854,0.00065411936,0.0009058098,0.0019323895,0.0026353437,0.00056387036,0.001095164,0.0017986216,0.0005360712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008953827,0.023805784,0.863966,0.0002910252,0.000525235,0.0016486483,0.03003209,0.0051129004,0.002861624,0.007926511,0.022548232,0.032328166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003416273,0.0038144258,0.9052263,0.00016217935,0.00026091738,0.0001836629,0.049143314,0.007451657,0.0012902295,0.00130828,0.02751768,0.00022510662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95513046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04486955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06703317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32555288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W211947739","doi":"","title":"Estimating the Impact of the Québec’s Work Incentive Program on Labour Supply: An Ex Post Microsimulation Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microsimulation; Labour supply; Economics; Subsidy; Reservation wage; Work (physics); Substitution effect; Labour economics; Margin (machine learning); Macro; Wage; Macro level; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.02970762604044545,"score_gpt":0.3694817308867722,"score_spread":0.33977410484632675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W211947739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98252016,0.00017653915,0.01198737,0.0005389922,0.000027499678,0.00011704178,0.0022185245,0.000067147055,0.0023465708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99034345,0.00007938242,0.003124741,0.000112386384,0.000015343263,0.00016070459,0.0019899488,0.000019569836,0.0041545862],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890625,0.00050065864,0.000030062874,0.00016883545,0.00007340179,0.00032091417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938066,0.0044738674,0.00051922124,0.00033099187,0.0006279612,0.00024124072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036344805,0.0006729323,0.0011001162,0.0006792992,0.00070310687,0.0010228232,0.0014390437,0.001007606,0.0070518726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007725688,0.0005481155,0.0015030181,0.0009924023,0.0005954675,0.0005228073,0.0010793051,0.001185062,0.00048227914],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040966147,0.00040679885,0.10453851,0.00010718903,0.00051244034,0.00026467346,0.0002502124,0.8709622,0.0007453105,0.0078064343,0.0024560618,0.01154047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007752283,0.00029062317,0.06870259,0.000032034448,0.0001370635,0.00002057658,0.0005427849,0.92631686,0.000376711,0.0018477192,0.001618049,0.000037437283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.614178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46389872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.385822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005389245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004252061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7761884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119684438","doi":"10.2307/3552511","title":"Strong Employment, Low Inflation: How Has the US Economy Done So Well?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inflation (cosmology); Economics; Keynesian economics; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.027409704936256052,"score_gpt":0.2566251538111541,"score_spread":0.22921544887489803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119684438","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018450499,0.20430352,0.00015053483,0.7535387,0.0017151015,0.000007372782,0.0005596302,0.000015025707,0.02125965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52222395,0.36120307,0.0004290773,0.10396495,0.0034270724,0.00002745119,0.00046133914,0.00003580119,0.008227218],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858034,0.0003567561,0.000055494183,0.000092482594,0.00042558793,0.00048934936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976265,0.000619783,0.00024529122,0.00003829232,0.00089672214,0.0005734311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025006307,0.00029840847,0.0004657502,0.0015649616,0.0045142733,0.0068975673,0.000548669,0.0035933347,0.003452564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066265143,0.00018579495,0.00029993674,0.0035107178,0.0076122642,0.003974019,0.001455582,0.003147502,0.0005050597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023299862,0.000089612666,0.045390394,0.00078292785,0.00017897264,0.0002967159,0.013131809,0.0006340258,0.00040921674,0.14627634,0.5607289,0.23184808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007527478,0.00007779169,0.2518794,0.0035079098,0.0002576179,0.00018531294,0.064375654,0.00048682583,0.0005688987,0.14888462,0.5294971,0.00020364199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76188844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89523244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76188844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02010386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031452164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47902763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120002944","doi":"10.7202/602305ar","title":"Comportements d’utilisation du temps non marchand des familles au Québec et au Canada : une modélisation sur les microdonnées du budget-temps de 1986 et de 1992","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.038390016746249776,"score_gpt":0.2578893798166748,"score_spread":0.21949936307042503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120002944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96744096,0.002213639,0.008645403,0.0014700505,0.00006446745,0.00024030541,0.0143390605,0.00011523076,0.0054708254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687182,0.0013874888,0.0041364655,0.00013870091,0.000013912331,0.0003324593,0.006799406,0.0000425299,0.01843095],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989693,0.00029777526,0.00005414524,0.00018995831,0.00015012386,0.00033856317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698776,0.0009915879,0.000373311,0.00013286698,0.0011487503,0.00036574117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002136753,0.000850242,0.0012817816,0.0013570316,0.0013566834,0.0027992453,0.0023002098,0.0011266153,0.0062040198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055460474,0.000734853,0.00163674,0.0030709899,0.0007947796,0.00081637624,0.0011045171,0.0012187805,0.0005511509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080911757,0.00018244104,0.5395011,0.00026957793,0.0012086808,0.00035901842,0.0021147805,0.4174915,0.0005038483,0.007640726,0.0059192493,0.023999944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021308482,0.00030155346,0.45347738,0.00042737942,0.0008258032,0.00011201667,0.0055104923,0.51441973,0.00044156157,0.003052465,0.021048766,0.00016977184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9852248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97717154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02835052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02835052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027483001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20569837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120121927","doi":"10.7202/602119ar","title":"Individus, familles et bien-être social","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.048153840424213785,"score_gpt":0.29453327782279287,"score_spread":0.2463794373985791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120121927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8910863,0.0034390867,0.03612728,0.003972785,0.00010774042,0.000048604485,0.00046350932,0.00003209761,0.06472266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966671,0.00044457655,0.0013774113,0.00008093971,0.00002750302,0.000027111018,0.000045532146,0.0000059266386,0.0013239848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99448806,0.0035916483,0.00014911928,0.0006247528,0.00077708415,0.0003692711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887756,0.007855745,0.0013248633,0.0010375285,0.00071802427,0.0002881951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005948534,0.00036642796,0.0006199722,0.0025594463,0.0016599772,0.0026120725,0.00066896115,0.00062038447,0.0069427695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019530475,0.00015604007,0.00039415364,0.0020203104,0.004820922,0.0037832842,0.0021609354,0.0008529799,0.00026904838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029495455,0.00012406158,0.23022169,0.00025076693,0.00036077652,0.00034171756,0.040229976,0.0020683056,0.00088441104,0.62295777,0.0010978923,0.10116766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025869314,0.00027973918,0.31467542,0.0002723856,0.00013976646,0.0007644373,0.053681746,0.0038517881,0.0012147069,0.586012,0.03900324,0.00007887916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069237864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063287085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069427695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015796159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008849853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031459212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120489314","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.291170","title":"The Timing of Births: A Marriage Market Analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Economics; Actuarial science; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.01117477911354434,"score_gpt":0.2700292208311287,"score_spread":0.2588544417175843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120489314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777549,0.0017383301,0.007520472,0.0011507458,0.000032765176,0.00007407557,0.0008621951,0.00004103736,0.0108255455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960491,0.00040479025,0.00041421948,0.00003439851,0.000037605067,0.000014846372,0.00020634776,0.0000116909405,0.002827061],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994448,0.00023650321,0.000021407719,0.00006601447,0.00008463034,0.00014670403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784436,0.017132778,0.0021648866,0.00050958653,0.0006985182,0.0010506173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035509062,0.00019660678,0.0008338375,0.002403069,0.0010423249,0.0020730116,0.0013771318,0.0009893333,0.022784889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01824174,0.00049090607,0.0008637547,0.0025555429,0.0009288843,0.0019430409,0.0009962602,0.0013920584,0.0009640124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024074833,0.00062207785,0.66277474,0.00022917683,0.0005014842,0.0018360234,0.003925183,0.019773457,0.0030065186,0.2228108,0.005011101,0.077101946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030797828,0.0012241678,0.8105081,0.00012713995,0.00075941696,0.0010287642,0.012352755,0.10167997,0.001639524,0.061214056,0.009048033,0.000110105095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0151208965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015919914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022784889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009306964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010103524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076223075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121001091","doi":"10.1111/1468-232x.00289","title":"Child Care Subsidies, Welfare Reforms, and Lone Mothers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Punitive damages; Welfare; Welfare reform; Social Welfare; Labour economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Child care; Public economics; Political science; Market economy; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.026387222764910484,"score_gpt":0.24985400908845504,"score_spread":0.22346678632354455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121001091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94726825,0.0029109041,0.00050305744,0.011747114,0.00008189748,0.00007420529,0.00092489494,0.00003222785,0.036457464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951931,0.0009818525,0.000121818404,0.00052285445,0.000016097283,0.000022480197,0.00012979293,0.0000025539211,0.0030094744],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987233,0.00036969467,0.000017262271,0.00004649094,0.00012439923,0.0007187522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972053,0.0012212759,0.00082829,0.00006131756,0.00018010994,0.0005036772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015497043,0.00018235756,0.00038033986,0.0005192984,0.0014575316,0.0014797858,0.0005402327,0.0012592882,0.012875779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005591046,0.00011134306,0.00049861905,0.0009502663,0.0010336328,0.0006766833,0.0010442496,0.00088512106,0.0001491297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030295812,0.0018304023,0.5950185,0.0006387467,0.0004973853,0.0015179445,0.0029444876,0.04179,0.0011273028,0.20770085,0.02742207,0.116482735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012582027,0.0013597682,0.86018485,0.00046062903,0.0007525613,0.00023020768,0.013902949,0.0131217055,0.0015121885,0.03103543,0.07610922,0.000072204246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29888937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50122434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29888937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008779693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008580616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5942993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121258717","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-4085.2005.00289.x","title":"Using Engel curves to estimate bias in the Canadian CPI as a cost of living index","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Engel curve; Economics; Cost of living; Index (typography); Econometrics; Welfare; Price index; Consumer price index (South Africa); Macroeconomics; Monetary policy","score_opus":0.21852199597648553,"score_gpt":0.27408786097930116,"score_spread":0.05556586500281563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121258717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53667444,0.0037754085,0.40305865,0.0025047173,0.00020626746,0.00057894946,0.010059086,0.0010618854,0.042080577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96670014,0.0007295117,0.024928484,0.00014426085,0.000024368524,0.00014470426,0.0030465163,0.0001255372,0.004156535],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524117,0.0018191,0.00018829812,0.00060661073,0.0016171465,0.00052776234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97038573,0.018055677,0.0036465297,0.0031718512,0.0044224816,0.00031767445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016997024,0.00082937226,0.001034687,0.004801536,0.0007943223,0.003043866,0.0016716468,0.0010504134,0.0039819013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088657014,0.0003893436,0.0014811921,0.0072738733,0.0020949417,0.0013798296,0.0015909766,0.0014627102,0.00047519524],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030954662,0.000051492963,0.30395287,0.000313069,0.00097554876,0.0002931785,0.0014877245,0.3328164,0.0004807027,0.19662078,0.013205452,0.14949319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057463123,0.0000670161,0.20262212,0.00027029458,0.00024186117,0.00016984763,0.00086971483,0.6683957,0.00086185854,0.10907708,0.017183742,0.00018330454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71392405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48536366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28607595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014479948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008209403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57552135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121913503","doi":"","title":"Assessing the Impact of Tax and Transfer Policies on Labour Supply: A Survey","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CIRANO Project Reports","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour supply; Economics; Welfare; Labour economics; Public economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.06926373667263801,"score_gpt":0.3627267473177183,"score_spread":0.2934630106450803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121913503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976247,0.00007607781,0.0001048354,0.00006735096,0.0000015804767,0.00003761921,0.0009908209,0.000002860602,0.0010942628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99489766,0.00039271807,0.0002423507,0.00011673424,0.0000085129295,0.00011104897,0.0016522242,0.0000044822737,0.002574221],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989209,0.0003778369,0.00011649422,0.000091833856,0.0003033393,0.0001896443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966961,0.0010258157,0.0010319847,0.00018010451,0.0007447642,0.00032121438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014306695,0.000116631265,0.00020745976,0.0010397963,0.0004653925,0.0004448555,0.00023331241,0.0004887948,0.0018792973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004278359,0.00021866239,0.00027803917,0.0014298332,0.00026355073,0.0005939957,0.0005299864,0.00045411327,0.0008968346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075352786,0.00015562309,0.9823558,0.000054086755,0.00002800872,0.00006587673,0.002814405,0.00020082065,0.00063935807,0.000086454136,0.0006229279,0.0129014235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026770872,0.00030079758,0.9921619,0.0000167121,0.000005744445,0.00006448822,0.004073517,0.00020259467,0.00026812978,0.000031352763,0.0028646602,0.0000074462037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017956242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022847347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017956242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007738187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084428437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03570348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122832781","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1053","title":"Disability, Poverty, and the Income Tax: The Case for Refundable Credits","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tax credit; Earned income tax credit; Public economics; Tax reform; Tax avoidance; Government (linguistics); Tax policy; Income tax; Poverty; Business; Direct tax; Work (physics); Indirect tax; State income tax; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03311607088496121,"score_gpt":0.34014681382515677,"score_spread":0.30703074294019556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122832781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20550601,0.019258156,0.0014546779,0.54153645,0.00038641173,0.000026569352,0.00022282268,0.000017208125,0.23159164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743319,0.008658256,0.00019800838,0.0068245567,0.00038692553,0.000016717884,0.000021998667,0.000011302655,0.009550365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987017,0.0005107038,0.000021700656,0.00006957932,0.00017025236,0.0005261129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944583,0.003697393,0.0005002751,0.00015914175,0.0004719146,0.0007129056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022440155,0.00021391653,0.00036486736,0.0015045424,0.0048478683,0.006260812,0.00083457876,0.005462592,0.009543971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008574498,0.00016227667,0.00036170366,0.0019271886,0.00897328,0.005264829,0.00362188,0.004756875,0.0003236913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000384693,0.000094145624,0.011780702,0.000046819343,0.000010386675,0.000523816,0.0062939744,0.0005629598,0.000026274243,0.9434833,0.023837684,0.013301553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006079138,0.00004459174,0.0252272,0.00076573895,0.000047749978,0.00079242646,0.044525802,0.0021029806,0.00019147409,0.69665176,0.22952758,0.00006187066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029596802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0461562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029596802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045158165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047082226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058849037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123013074","doi":"10.7202/602240ar","title":"Dépendance à l’égard de l’aide sociale et réforme de la sécurité du revenu","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03295631347499372,"score_gpt":0.28925392106144565,"score_spread":0.2562976075864519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123013074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672783,0.0013294381,0.0011838907,0.0034293903,0.000014987676,0.000028663726,0.00019073747,0.000011900101,0.026532745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99424183,0.000271658,0.00022022272,0.000060226674,0.000008041174,0.000009027493,0.000031850323,0.0000027017397,0.005154436],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976392,0.00092570373,0.000044178356,0.00019218664,0.0005167501,0.00068211206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99406624,0.002029478,0.0012485182,0.00032742094,0.0013981081,0.0009301727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028325026,0.00016960294,0.00027078777,0.00086142786,0.0014652007,0.0018597948,0.0005201153,0.00046531527,0.008134495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00843715,0.0001357585,0.00021697559,0.0012439456,0.001938252,0.0007595906,0.0010683327,0.00058935175,0.00031981434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045892305,0.00016773929,0.78960323,0.0002931719,0.0002832025,0.00043405793,0.025080208,0.0066243485,0.0029865287,0.06334653,0.0032998577,0.10742219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010522952,0.00009401365,0.96342236,0.00009879183,0.000041755284,0.000051854007,0.008841537,0.0011453568,0.00040400293,0.0022106974,0.02366048,0.00001863962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52291673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6611592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52291673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010923286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010093902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9597858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124801476","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4932.2005.00257.x","title":"Demands for Child Care and Household Labour Supply in Australia*","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Record","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Tobit model; Labour supply; Constraint (computer-aided design); Child care; Budget constraint; Labour economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Bivariate analysis; Discrete choice; Medicine; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Nursing","score_opus":0.02707665362278264,"score_gpt":0.2791187295474646,"score_spread":0.2520420759246819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124801476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99782854,0.00009902445,0.00007453147,0.00013291158,0.0000016236577,0.0000038314083,0.00031086605,0.0000013112065,0.0015473007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981305,0.00009670696,0.000117894284,0.000016172346,0.0000018074201,0.000010258576,0.0002541417,0.0000018516586,0.0013706699],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994784,0.0001939323,0.000037031197,0.000053576634,0.00014063831,0.000096517164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986014,0.00038735633,0.0004816729,0.00007637347,0.0002591155,0.00019404636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000628707,0.00012516767,0.00020708366,0.0006198936,0.0005106481,0.00060965406,0.00022897405,0.00021561138,0.0027808298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042643896,0.00023716605,0.00022519293,0.0013403804,0.00031707622,0.00046510092,0.0009775697,0.0004184182,0.00024437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007649257,0.00006353952,0.97317004,0.000071744864,0.00007807687,0.00031456398,0.0063719167,0.0030237176,0.00041218178,0.0020908816,0.0011178349,0.013209052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016416153,0.000014390876,0.99568933,0.000015513944,0.0000038664207,0.00004588549,0.0012888813,0.0016729728,0.000022290173,0.00024338858,0.0009975373,0.000004318601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22256763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29072198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22256763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021411658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089032727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44254428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124844761","doi":"","title":"Marriage, Fertility and Divorce: A Dynamic Equilibrium Analysis of Social Policy in Canada ¤ (Preliminary Version)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Social policy; Distribution (mathematics); Fertility; Style (visual arts); Demographic economics; Public economics; Sociology; Population; Market economy; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.008475243876776851,"score_gpt":0.26477169653965166,"score_spread":0.2562964526628748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124844761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.733115,0.0047072005,0.04152816,0.036229204,0.0003157823,0.00028679692,0.007636242,0.00019172151,0.17598979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9653589,0.0023604974,0.003908288,0.00067719223,0.000066392626,0.00007796984,0.00057611143,0.000030488734,0.026944123],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960536,0.00006691814,0.000006944407,0.000045282704,0.00006436927,0.00021126353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995844,0.00013660063,0.00004700127,0.00001275423,0.00011894822,0.000100363235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060301495,0.00042408056,0.0010042149,0.00080952287,0.0025922712,0.0023477247,0.0017387617,0.0017176127,0.011813171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026266098,0.00033702477,0.001034415,0.0013675014,0.001462807,0.0012689051,0.0011986637,0.0015848873,0.00040013227],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009766952,0.00007827904,0.013564961,0.000093366114,0.0000747273,0.00024948636,0.00075914984,0.490357,0.00043870613,0.4696535,0.014929221,0.009703868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002048911,0.00008491759,0.017429875,0.00009510409,0.00014712292,0.000080187165,0.0025734897,0.84196126,0.00028329523,0.106789134,0.030236727,0.00011393688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9633637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03284697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03284697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028072635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23832256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124849253","doi":"","title":"Assessing the Impact of Non- Response on the Treatment Effect in the Canadian Self-Sufficiency Experiment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Econometrics; Sample (material); Demographic economics; Treatment effect; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Economics; Statistics; Actuarial science; Mathematics; Medicine; Accounting","score_opus":0.02255144688103868,"score_gpt":0.30659665208560377,"score_spread":0.2840452052045651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124849253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788071,0.0005762486,0.0037243587,0.0009939455,0.00013569497,0.0017707607,0.00080553285,0.00007574649,0.013110663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96583617,0.00052164914,0.0071189054,0.00091245375,0.00003510585,0.0025683723,0.00055775396,0.000058997706,0.02239058],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98290795,0.009550971,0.00053062727,0.0015149717,0.004084413,0.0014110629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94782186,0.0374962,0.0052323123,0.0037406564,0.004069139,0.0016398176],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020037837,0.0011634806,0.0014661303,0.0005322405,0.002339932,0.0014304407,0.0025789237,0.0018171195,0.0063994355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053565595,0.0006479831,0.0008456309,0.00085193483,0.0033469542,0.00087963016,0.0012368131,0.0019412541,0.00042843117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.26925454,0.033497564,0.24728459,0.004030086,0.003905153,0.00080104236,0.026361268,0.016369581,0.07702868,0.03380681,0.011549619,0.2761111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020905428,0.05262395,0.82291144,0.00047128205,0.0041307057,0.00013405854,0.0048440006,0.02255626,0.02247474,0.009823992,0.03855253,0.0005716327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7938548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81559056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97996217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018894766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027531102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4147185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125868487","doi":"10.1111/1468-0297.00657","title":"A Cournot-Nash Model of Family Decision Making*","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":277,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Chen; Cournot competition; Sociology; Economics; Mathematical economics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04605241700625577,"score_gpt":0.3094129373854106,"score_spread":0.2633605203791548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125868487","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106241964,0.0015319526,0.636288,0.005431762,0.0002524738,0.0002905964,0.00067991787,0.000119980126,0.24916337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93025655,0.0010398718,0.038181607,0.00028715434,0.00009540985,0.0002244653,0.00011205399,0.00001614414,0.029786747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986324,0.00079374725,0.000029683359,0.00015796657,0.00019412734,0.00019208613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992243,0.000437252,0.00011049185,0.000050187777,0.00007632089,0.00010138432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014636633,0.0007122678,0.00063847203,0.00036365437,0.0011864111,0.002307043,0.0013218373,0.001530866,0.008038711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028403734,0.00029797864,0.0005238426,0.0007266513,0.0017958833,0.0021961327,0.000796141,0.0010612534,0.0009187874],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028667699,0.000031222924,0.00044070047,0.000025416153,0.000018458262,0.00024106538,0.00037541243,0.07624246,0.00018424152,0.9165795,0.0014030165,0.0044298097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045311343,0.000045276698,0.00041212578,0.000023404138,0.000012830526,0.00012981726,0.00027747086,0.23296984,0.00009276117,0.7545863,0.011379067,0.000025924726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008441036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007151201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008441036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021113015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016305541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026892126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125884035","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.22.1.027","title":"Women, Substantive Equality, and Fiscal Policy: Gender-Based Analysis of Taxes, Benefits, and Budgets","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Gender equality; Sociology; Art; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0390689647909661,"score_gpt":0.2741626466090408,"score_spread":0.23509368181807472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125884035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7797884,0.007284626,0.004336474,0.011761831,0.00010264248,0.00007941269,0.0005978869,0.000013569594,0.19603516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99046963,0.0011994594,0.00039223544,0.00033121547,0.000025355566,0.000034852073,0.00005411938,0.000008959224,0.007484182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824834,0.00072484504,0.000036630317,0.00010841586,0.00029399048,0.0005878349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981358,0.0010878938,0.00031970843,0.00008041721,0.00018156237,0.00019455183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020523143,0.00016752603,0.00033299706,0.0025690994,0.002174335,0.0034203432,0.00050418166,0.0004959019,0.0073757996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065445052,0.00010985709,0.0003164336,0.0034191099,0.004414334,0.0017274916,0.0019764786,0.00069041183,0.0001515613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017140106,0.00007936801,0.16287093,0.00013520151,0.000062303494,0.00021325225,0.044085164,0.0011671111,0.00024515524,0.73507524,0.0030332971,0.052861545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023828872,0.00013258509,0.5068961,0.00073725404,0.0001168282,0.00015913245,0.17040594,0.0018477998,0.00061698916,0.15204662,0.16698074,0.000036240872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1257823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23305091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8742177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010320562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009138905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25010037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126473761","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.931580","title":"Labor Unions, Operating Flexibility, and the Cost of Equity","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Labour economics; Equity (law); Business; Pay Equity; Economics; Political science; Management; Law","score_opus":0.022206040492252208,"score_gpt":0.32983154574858026,"score_spread":0.30762550525632804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126473761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80071163,0.0018563955,0.0044035963,0.008370153,0.000055938504,0.000025052585,0.00016974048,0.000017406772,0.18439008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871135,0.00009289846,0.00005238232,0.000048660066,0.000015718202,0.000003823769,0.000006370898,0.0000017160961,0.0010671277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985668,0.0005094028,0.00005169105,0.00009854695,0.0002682401,0.00050547154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886057,0.00784497,0.001689375,0.0006501566,0.0003803752,0.0008293232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003061153,0.00016174493,0.0003134395,0.00084744097,0.0015249766,0.004268326,0.0005740761,0.0013777647,0.014399555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01261521,0.00014292271,0.00021255715,0.0010623751,0.0040277676,0.0027483213,0.0017262313,0.0012463827,0.00021182073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045784345,0.00025461812,0.080838434,0.00004632202,0.0000506677,0.00031056206,0.0025815119,0.009083167,0.0005017935,0.85725766,0.0020798158,0.046537686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091310394,0.00016816123,0.11448489,0.00015367943,0.000054034288,0.00027474738,0.012545976,0.008599557,0.00055059494,0.8461722,0.016852118,0.000052679792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038049803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058503514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014399555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026602484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013896022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04817134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126496750","doi":"10.17848/wp01-74","title":"Nonstandard Work and Child Care Choices of Married Mothers","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung; W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research","keywords":"Endogeneity; Child care; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Economics; Psychology; Medicine; Econometrics; Nursing","score_opus":0.022153136534665642,"score_gpt":0.3011380287549715,"score_spread":0.2789848922203058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126496750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996841,0.000041019666,0.000041266427,0.000034731893,0.0000013417429,0.0000013344641,0.00003602677,2.9224125e-7,0.00015990967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994215,0.00008424315,0.00005474173,0.000017614373,0.0000028181892,0.0000025336203,0.000054680164,5.0554485e-7,0.000361419],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995852,0.00017098477,0.000021691185,0.000044015494,0.000053178563,0.00012498017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980434,0.00071418856,0.0008279353,0.00009836594,0.00006302143,0.0002530313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009206232,0.000105144645,0.00022618451,0.00043529642,0.00049516297,0.00064962916,0.00020423565,0.00026368166,0.0027808007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003751197,0.00022183584,0.000271595,0.00047200892,0.00030631872,0.0002792152,0.0005662285,0.00037529707,0.00025511172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005314951,0.000058256806,0.9946584,0.0000039901156,0.000017612016,0.00011787225,0.000796659,0.00012594865,0.00016732031,0.00017102897,0.000047031397,0.0037826742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000097716365,0.00011098707,0.99426347,0.000009540781,0.000018372055,0.000116954136,0.0037793568,0.0007089911,0.00020716239,0.00035341247,0.0004169474,0.000005053173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013336375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031459082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013336375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034785466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003177347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02651745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127017084","doi":"10.7202/602224ar","title":"Choix occupationnels et offre de travail lorsque les salaires sont fonction des heures travaillées","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04856939666815891,"score_gpt":0.2929658958385832,"score_spread":0.24439649917042428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127017084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94157434,0.0007425333,0.028025586,0.0014734928,0.00003205164,0.00007818663,0.0007276178,0.000047383623,0.027298782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731144,0.00067245617,0.00479482,0.00007034189,0.000017542878,0.000116901385,0.00022615142,0.000013644165,0.020973668],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994368,0.00020056183,0.000021625014,0.00011275764,0.00007004827,0.00015813527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983126,0.0011108133,0.00024321456,0.00008887951,0.000103886494,0.00014058148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094399066,0.00040732336,0.00055857765,0.0006681233,0.00058777316,0.002125051,0.0007497036,0.00082655804,0.021536665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024120351,0.00033831986,0.001213381,0.00070971606,0.0006850848,0.0007372424,0.00074501237,0.00065484265,0.0015400597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014306244,0.0009028636,0.5998906,0.00045574456,0.00049677776,0.0010019093,0.010297735,0.13534725,0.0048185824,0.15108238,0.0039846892,0.09029087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019442498,0.001012048,0.58124936,0.00047658914,0.0004028948,0.00062203116,0.018151166,0.23596182,0.0029620368,0.12240986,0.03635657,0.00020124337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028650554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031257756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028650554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020950423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019892703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07204735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127044592","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2009.01217.x","title":"Models of Earning and Caring: Determinants of the Division of Work","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.06054783831255838,"score_gpt":0.2858788811100898,"score_spread":0.2253310427975314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127044592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88097537,0.0020204522,0.03211948,0.008334743,0.00008977402,0.0001968371,0.0004245932,0.000041838117,0.07579693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99155444,0.000748285,0.0018501279,0.00009766994,0.00002397706,0.00006704203,0.00007749196,0.000008036482,0.0055729365],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980336,0.0010074254,0.000064179316,0.00018129774,0.0002814104,0.00043224657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98833746,0.0077887652,0.001423737,0.00059921877,0.00054710335,0.0013036669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037999374,0.0007650702,0.00057321956,0.0017963682,0.001682088,0.005034563,0.0015233497,0.0011250441,0.018074205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012788533,0.00031625747,0.0014574808,0.0019932673,0.002273639,0.0022136276,0.003674502,0.0013786631,0.0011561348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031061677,0.0005965318,0.46358082,0.00019642455,0.0002355461,0.0004911178,0.01284121,0.044340763,0.00019469217,0.42278403,0.0035318728,0.050896484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014809897,0.00037449482,0.27906612,0.0007787699,0.00027905012,0.00069347786,0.02971071,0.16903792,0.00026875222,0.4967465,0.022773845,0.00012222366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022128204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018701782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022128204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041427384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043045986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060464263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127054757","doi":"10.7202/600612ar","title":"Approches économiques de la fécondité","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.013871643164608254,"score_gpt":0.24220445818949318,"score_spread":0.22833281502488492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127054757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014323707,0.022225805,0.41925278,0.064347394,0.0035810743,0.00015988955,0.0007833319,0.00034736696,0.47497874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5754834,0.021471392,0.23142259,0.0075352155,0.004699906,0.0011152902,0.0005159605,0.00038348336,0.15737271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995304,0.0022986166,0.00012442995,0.0007079788,0.0012699403,0.00029505545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964708,0.0019961854,0.00022268928,0.00051294715,0.0007018944,0.00009545157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008395263,0.0012602636,0.0009055561,0.0031097578,0.0023588256,0.0067794085,0.0023483525,0.0030874163,0.019035354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011744718,0.00048062584,0.001261387,0.002915585,0.007514065,0.0071419543,0.002587678,0.0053296187,0.0025196704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007502496,0.0000044290946,0.00007790369,0.000016617005,0.0000052047626,0.00001313264,0.00005682216,0.0009798243,0.00002104725,0.9909972,0.0020478405,0.0057725296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014279954,0.000007695513,0.00027753535,0.000087781606,0.000009622758,0.000040621268,0.00011958615,0.005229165,0.00008565612,0.9135822,0.080532946,0.000012898367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015484963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013772671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019035354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008151617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042027505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063679636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127428487","doi":"","title":"Social policy, gender inequality and poverty","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Affect (linguistics); Inequality; Independence (probability theory); Gender inequality; Sample (material); Economic independence; Demographic economics; Social security; Marital status; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Development economics; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.06063220528311757,"score_gpt":0.3379944886446476,"score_spread":0.27736228336153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127428487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6308617,0.026459184,0.0024945114,0.026593456,0.00027524814,0.00007319357,0.00073458295,0.000028030885,0.3124802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745409,0.009442529,0.00072055147,0.00088917604,0.000039185452,0.000053915726,0.00013847924,0.0000075689677,0.014167799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995987,0.00010218784,0.000006342305,0.000024424367,0.00012942255,0.00013905487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963677,0.00018559516,0.000055285782,0.000011402122,0.000053810345,0.000057015288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000745475,0.00021425761,0.00017873017,0.0011669041,0.0038420965,0.0017586758,0.00027277626,0.00029362802,0.0037076613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011474983,0.00006561964,0.00007824932,0.0024882676,0.005994272,0.0011548795,0.0012334619,0.000441659,0.00010246895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037728874,0.000049653958,0.10144036,0.00032545667,0.000016679614,0.0007157327,0.2072202,0.00086237106,0.00070102286,0.4241236,0.02324382,0.24126345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006339436,0.0000437787,0.28320408,0.00076746836,0.000015581563,0.0005261424,0.2744299,0.0005159236,0.0004058535,0.11136366,0.32868922,0.000032072345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47912377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6617545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47912377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007661153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009759662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9526699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128588287","doi":"","title":"Life after teenage motherhood","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Educational attainment; Socioeconomic status; Psychology; Teenage pregnancy; Demographic economics; Developmental psychology; Population; Economics; Sociology; Demography; Economic growth","score_opus":0.02097033841046968,"score_gpt":0.2550498799298536,"score_spread":0.23407954151938393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128588287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89562744,0.026593259,0.00055023556,0.018947177,0.0012463254,0.000052596308,0.0008259258,0.00003274205,0.05612435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793966,0.012561614,0.00014500404,0.0011920981,0.00019242661,0.000025007794,0.0002629024,0.0000061600417,0.0062181125],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970514,0.0000817614,0.00001136962,0.000026917935,0.000035051133,0.00013977772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992587,0.00013826176,0.00014498818,0.000027781345,0.00009678581,0.0003333715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003646535,0.00012527789,0.00023959455,0.0005117874,0.0013161993,0.0014574856,0.00018281909,0.0006287046,0.005763336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023954269,0.0001012465,0.00023062149,0.0005039602,0.0006848452,0.0010110495,0.0012342017,0.0009496531,0.00047045786],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017618778,0.00032455949,0.7250621,0.00030052537,0.00008014568,0.006867781,0.055490468,0.0001446107,0.0013182259,0.035652027,0.015156497,0.15942687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001651655,0.00054587435,0.70242727,0.0009276836,0.00007625967,0.0074967337,0.083222285,0.00013339007,0.00058785995,0.014582555,0.18994942,0.000034146702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053162756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00901474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005763336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005319681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010133876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019280255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128710049","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2012.10.031","title":"A social work study on the impact of different factors on respect to women","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.04365043400354146,"score_gpt":0.32547251091165535,"score_spread":0.2818220769081139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128710049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996521,0.00027743715,0.000055554414,0.0004270073,0.000019318879,0.00001356822,0.000013474833,9.849259e-7,0.0026716595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988932,0.00031621594,0.000029287521,0.00010814976,0.000018506109,0.000011272989,0.000008014409,6.9805094e-7,0.0006147657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876595,0.000767777,0.000045133016,0.00006239688,0.00012649289,0.00023229817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99383885,0.003934644,0.00068032707,0.0001569665,0.00037508257,0.001014123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002083743,0.0002375732,0.00021193162,0.0015363774,0.0038391175,0.0009708424,0.0001677231,0.00040777755,0.0023270426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050272043,0.00012468475,0.00039869474,0.0011945866,0.0015150597,0.00065636844,0.0007304024,0.0006786175,0.00012454073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024234584,0.0016420827,0.50122917,0.00022654959,0.00009370597,0.001433685,0.40581867,0.00006180741,0.001116473,0.0024765122,0.0018894228,0.08376952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003205076,0.00138058,0.5743524,0.00014848742,0.00007862377,0.00070049614,0.40611225,0.000086771506,0.00048510847,0.00049887534,0.016091412,0.00003290034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003816245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008030939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038391175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011785901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014435147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011020064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129152249","doi":"","title":"Gender Discrimination and Growth: Theory and Evidence from India","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":216,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Gender discrimination; Economics; Human capital; Inequality; Investment (military); Stigma (botany); Per capita; Demographic economics; Gender inequality; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Economic growth; Demography","score_opus":0.06807607560565652,"score_gpt":0.37441387728592884,"score_spread":0.3063378016802723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129152249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95797515,0.008802139,0.0004622561,0.002942318,0.000029473606,0.000012706819,0.0010265664,0.000017485561,0.02873196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99576074,0.0034480137,0.00007744053,0.000091071975,0.000021798818,0.0000031789878,0.00022408438,0.0000023566356,0.00037128618],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996233,0.00012336519,0.000021372862,0.000048991973,0.000072730574,0.00011034102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99368215,0.0039688945,0.0014614253,0.00024526456,0.00039519698,0.00024718957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008336107,0.00023714207,0.0002451312,0.0018179613,0.0007939281,0.0014880054,0.0005796321,0.00047040498,0.003661878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036769013,0.00017390061,0.00035002106,0.0047462783,0.0020596646,0.0007303763,0.0011897179,0.000778531,0.00036821526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022977807,0.0001792017,0.898824,0.0003681654,0.0001576127,0.00074114226,0.00845388,0.0034557355,0.00016557901,0.02334206,0.0044967625,0.05958606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001416758,0.00007257258,0.97105163,0.00021602846,0.00012586644,0.0002675953,0.01049481,0.0019852861,0.0002392725,0.0073709907,0.008136614,0.0000252087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06412909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05234073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06412909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013457527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069299596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12751162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131388306","doi":"10.1111/1471-6402.00034","title":"Family Forms and Member Well-Being: A Research Agenda for the Decade of Behavior","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychology of Women Quarterly","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Inequality; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.07685805361180939,"score_gpt":0.41470551259520344,"score_spread":0.3378474589833941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131388306","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043711986,0.67957616,0.0025833815,0.24604605,0.0017619482,0.000029021607,0.00014252942,0.000024996936,0.026123976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37461948,0.6013849,0.0029519568,0.013871701,0.0034187485,0.00010192573,0.0001011496,0.000024592602,0.0035255242],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978543,0.0013488964,0.00008136842,0.00023234857,0.00026200322,0.00022096449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823877,0.012531242,0.001322631,0.00063378457,0.0017740448,0.001350443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009441684,0.0003486445,0.0010987076,0.0026072133,0.0021848152,0.0076378677,0.001063141,0.0030482768,0.0062249517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012917201,0.00027401545,0.00043087633,0.0039123627,0.013420632,0.012965455,0.0024556385,0.003784717,0.00038189304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002705255,0.0005322552,0.07074341,0.0025464648,0.00014053573,0.00026280887,0.022220789,0.0005842759,0.00038770243,0.43931326,0.021059612,0.44193846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031878728,0.00064387283,0.16164331,0.011686233,0.00017631613,0.0008110642,0.11350823,0.00093100953,0.0004310315,0.27751973,0.4324375,0.00017990873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011382628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013449503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011382628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039474815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008897593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049933016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131648638","doi":"10.1086/668282","title":"Status, Caste, and the Time Allocation of Women in Rural India","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Development and Cultural Change","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":205,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Caste; Autonomy; Hierarchy; Work (physics); Poverty; Demographic economics; Time allocation; Economics; Developing country; Survey data collection; Sociology; Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Development economics; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.026092577339204615,"score_gpt":0.24838412911706692,"score_spread":0.2222915517778623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131648638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99818194,0.0000730339,0.000035557136,0.00012958271,0.0000034789994,0.0000021139344,0.000038910235,0.0000012036178,0.0015341447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99934334,0.000044988414,0.000023119499,0.000014078844,0.0000030187969,0.0000019551712,0.00002728805,9.173102e-7,0.0005412818],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995377,0.00014459336,0.000018024244,0.000033362576,0.0000446015,0.00022179178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987657,0.00023884447,0.00040745453,0.000090179245,0.000088421606,0.00040944188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056207844,0.0001119311,0.00012454108,0.0010358992,0.0009875387,0.0008083004,0.0003673902,0.00019855172,0.0030291192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002053602,0.00012849602,0.00016182948,0.0009404239,0.00074870297,0.0002636442,0.0010748652,0.00031431898,0.0003356044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001444081,0.0000709097,0.9793084,0.000014030611,0.000017924114,0.00013771634,0.010270185,0.00020747342,0.00057267386,0.0012078631,0.00029099965,0.007757339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057245657,0.000044794455,0.98851436,0.000010958933,0.0000067492024,0.00007264204,0.009868818,0.00017303623,0.000097850825,0.00027235612,0.0009261225,0.0000065556087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022026917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052035805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022026917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005525948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005073064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043797433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132118604","doi":"10.1257/aer.20161329","title":"The Impact of Family Income on Child Achievement: Evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit: Reply","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":449,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Earned income tax credit; Instrumental variable; Income tax; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Labour economics; Tax credit; Public economics","score_opus":0.04162224576709179,"score_gpt":0.3508961612993184,"score_spread":0.3092739155322266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132118604","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021546008,0.00925114,0.00012136291,0.9827979,0.004059856,0.000004454708,0.00053130835,0.000007993347,0.0010712778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11522429,0.04253974,0.0006516648,0.802249,0.028972687,0.00008662936,0.00094175787,0.0000641079,0.009270088],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784815,0.0010259701,0.00022053767,0.00036248856,0.00038358037,0.00015918398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93041915,0.05660366,0.0025303098,0.0021498825,0.0074439296,0.00085307605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008345137,0.0005148042,0.0009901696,0.0012358292,0.0008874455,0.0017201803,0.0019084903,0.008640338,0.0081995195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04598726,0.00040703572,0.00094354595,0.0025372356,0.0024986917,0.0031569444,0.0020303638,0.008969528,0.0029225424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017522153,0.00004653552,0.009192548,0.00055720244,0.00013534326,0.00016963208,0.00069956464,0.00017096188,0.00011137365,0.016207462,0.9532039,0.019330373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000504674,0.00018014143,0.08913971,0.003572041,0.0006178373,0.00062604103,0.007851512,0.0008789542,0.0013599878,0.07313027,0.8218576,0.0002812319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017275209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013231927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017275209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012650543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002733897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044133842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132545807","doi":"10.7202/040810ar","title":"State Policy, Livelihood Protection and Gender on Canada's East Coast","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Society for International Health","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Victoria","keywords":"Livelihood; Restructuring; Fishery; State (computer science); Resource (disambiguation); Geography; Business; Agriculture; Finance","score_opus":0.06110071612949833,"score_gpt":0.2999172391938083,"score_spread":0.23881652306430998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132545807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9429809,0.001625129,0.00016661218,0.010776985,0.000034589957,0.000015417845,0.00035156863,0.000011866578,0.044036824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913872,0.0006204042,0.000098457946,0.0005704151,0.0000048548186,0.0000072159783,0.000074855656,0.0000048481793,0.0072318553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810815,0.00018224673,0.000021620992,0.00010300948,0.00030237503,0.0012826486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713516,0.00041382707,0.00025946274,0.00007207509,0.00085938204,0.0012600201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012494101,0.00015735987,0.00029310974,0.0008261997,0.013167161,0.0033754748,0.00095307536,0.0007938963,0.0047878795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026199864,0.0001589322,0.00023732914,0.0016172234,0.0045059,0.000889473,0.0021795004,0.0011883321,0.00012467738],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005108244,0.00018083141,0.56432223,0.00019420407,0.00012193276,0.0012047043,0.09201635,0.002735194,0.002492972,0.18663004,0.030627618,0.11896315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027651116,0.00006433364,0.7796096,0.0003741494,0.00005962817,0.00009944216,0.11412761,0.000825563,0.00060711557,0.004566735,0.09956076,0.000077385535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99840087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91006315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.089936875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10461322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65254074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132702733","doi":"","title":"Why are Fertility and Female Participation Rates Positively Correlated across OECD countries","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Total fertility rate; Economics; Unemployment; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Shock (circulatory); Population; Demography; Family planning; Economic growth; Medicine; Research methodology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04925285551939159,"score_gpt":0.37207668079406847,"score_spread":0.3228238252746769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132702733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910602,0.0018387047,0.00021238849,0.0009483205,0.000015719252,0.0000068859945,0.0015350255,0.000022055156,0.0043607326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830246,0.0007262343,0.00006559544,0.00008182362,0.000019846635,0.0000054563516,0.0005783477,0.000003271425,0.00021689778],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993637,0.00013174588,0.00004978208,0.00014222592,0.000099241515,0.00021332018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949104,0.0009294411,0.0028856175,0.00035490523,0.00058888417,0.00033079745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009955462,0.0001406305,0.00045318206,0.002677287,0.00037234684,0.0013298842,0.0002996135,0.00034957638,0.001792637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051228344,0.00015840314,0.00043706037,0.004067581,0.0007722471,0.0004305803,0.000706879,0.0003471917,0.00027535445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043336324,0.000010241158,0.9888437,0.000029621655,0.00011645469,0.00016876937,0.0002861611,0.0008164984,0.00016207778,0.0010451567,0.00068553025,0.0077924607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035828957,0.000008322128,0.9980373,0.000021838596,0.000021036149,0.000048969276,0.00042003984,0.00015764027,0.00008682524,0.00023251378,0.0009553496,0.0000066197726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04228247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03210676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04228247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088892103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006281485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08407271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132894667","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.664506","title":"Cooperative Models in Action: Simulation of a Nash-Bargaining Model of Household Labor Supply with Taxation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining problem; Operationalization; Economics; Negotiation; Microeconomics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Identification (biology); Order (exchange); Action (physics); Nash equilibrium; Computer science","score_opus":0.03432167436051933,"score_gpt":0.28859751004704454,"score_spread":0.25427583568652523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132894667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93396026,0.0001199686,0.038444567,0.0011724693,0.000075594944,0.000097460885,0.0005088108,0.000103590464,0.025517313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923701,0.000053047977,0.0037379109,0.000048163838,0.000007615127,0.0000707727,0.00009523853,0.000016321277,0.003600792],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995198,0.00023275126,0.000017044538,0.000055974153,0.00004589512,0.00012855155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99616796,0.0027926427,0.0002108523,0.00016517223,0.0002476636,0.00041562726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013857115,0.00054899155,0.0011292397,0.0008370784,0.001163874,0.0015296391,0.0016900308,0.0027637887,0.011165367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061805877,0.0006384642,0.0009420395,0.0010438687,0.001580292,0.0017192913,0.001201743,0.0013389055,0.00046085232],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096399395,0.00012785211,0.0013885187,0.000017051632,0.00001938445,0.00008342059,0.00019622258,0.9706297,0.00015378921,0.025800956,0.0005116617,0.000975082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048952043,0.000024381563,0.00019540299,0.0000035156877,0.0000056241693,0.000004793589,0.000091868016,0.9945749,0.00004734258,0.0048336084,0.00016307968,0.0000065340823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047062766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026300505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047062766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026025428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021045383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09357762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133088732","doi":"10.1142/s1793812010000265","title":"Gender Poverty in Tunisia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Middle East Development Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Stochastic dominance; Poverty; Economics; Demographic economics; Endowment; Dominance (genetics); Labour economics; Econometrics; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.04748135631200601,"score_gpt":0.26531532266625324,"score_spread":0.21783396635424723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133088732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954679,0.0014133756,0.00009016298,0.0005089336,0.000012684153,0.0000039978513,0.00025188373,0.0000024551018,0.0022486192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985133,0.00060969027,0.00005764111,0.000048156497,0.00001056538,0.0000045531015,0.000069008165,9.036243e-7,0.00068616524],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996227,0.00011627916,0.000016871863,0.000038323884,0.000040832583,0.00016490831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996517,0.000071304305,0.00016831701,0.0000119052975,0.000048291513,0.00004858725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006657058,0.00016983369,0.0002022322,0.0015119079,0.00085640687,0.0008000843,0.0001777597,0.0002547255,0.0026582908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009962508,0.00011082022,0.00024781696,0.0019192329,0.00048206907,0.00061122084,0.000695419,0.00024744676,0.00015472146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019741707,0.000070355585,0.93431365,0.00012886408,0.000097569755,0.0010713224,0.0092838565,0.0006359205,0.00080842397,0.004503952,0.0015670938,0.0473215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035626995,0.00006197932,0.9849627,0.00008226351,0.00001543788,0.00032656555,0.0069207577,0.00040263706,0.00016422501,0.00032960708,0.0067216223,0.000008714462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06993128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07212502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06993128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018602463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089645537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13904846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134506188","doi":"10.7202/013466ar","title":"Choix de consommation des ménages en présence de plusieurs décideurs","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03198194386862362,"score_gpt":0.2809432531999083,"score_spread":0.24896130933128469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134506188","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38091382,0.0024124985,0.5409862,0.0037309444,0.00035663493,0.0005285885,0.0013757511,0.00039848805,0.0692971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87763286,0.0008261491,0.09826399,0.00038450162,0.00012322521,0.00053978345,0.00056345994,0.0001511435,0.021514885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99091375,0.0034220507,0.00042945612,0.0027809166,0.0017841284,0.0006696115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96703446,0.022098782,0.0037005486,0.003565322,0.0026331062,0.00096773496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008859117,0.0012166725,0.0016678467,0.0012587401,0.0017138232,0.005669521,0.0022603376,0.0022231636,0.030012118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04150812,0.0011048202,0.002229984,0.0013415241,0.0034915595,0.00867896,0.003290736,0.0030825373,0.0021980917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001634296,0.0003860775,0.06620199,0.0011412087,0.0009786928,0.00088646915,0.007844049,0.06548211,0.00821447,0.6993072,0.003339725,0.14458376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036635523,0.0011925361,0.050893065,0.00076748297,0.0010434301,0.00091974693,0.010690181,0.2681027,0.01155907,0.59737515,0.05674048,0.00034977836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008329509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068525793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030012118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026105386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031563174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10040057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136045807","doi":"10.7202/602291ar","title":"Traitement fiscal optimal des familles quand la fécondité est endogène","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.05494303505344585,"score_gpt":0.28464004942898713,"score_spread":0.22969701437554127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136045807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.894431,0.003346636,0.051687524,0.007919375,0.00014542989,0.00013571414,0.0026143086,0.00027681273,0.039443135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832954,0.0010890124,0.005878317,0.00029790716,0.00003936417,0.0000642897,0.0005815329,0.000020270012,0.008733949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891984,0.00046642942,0.000038916874,0.00018824995,0.00010881478,0.00027774458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996516,0.0020445469,0.0006882395,0.00032781268,0.00023835876,0.00018501186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026481522,0.00045242795,0.0009029662,0.0006363546,0.00065087416,0.0017464038,0.0005422384,0.00081999105,0.012699167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009062523,0.0003342378,0.0007301463,0.0007314574,0.000651266,0.0015593709,0.0006647333,0.001148769,0.0006758535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044399016,0.0009276703,0.19608405,0.0008314648,0.0015304912,0.0011308012,0.002587504,0.2063875,0.006723374,0.34632924,0.01701012,0.21601784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011302609,0.0024098426,0.28564483,0.0010327608,0.0017683896,0.0013365886,0.009156544,0.2227748,0.0063330736,0.38309786,0.08510151,0.00021349288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025551943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022239795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025551943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026745712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025496788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050806403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136234506","doi":"10.1186/2193-8997-1-3","title":"Personality and marital surplus","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IZA Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Graduate Center; Barnard College; University of Washington; Russell Sage Foundation; City University of New York; York University; Sage Foundation","keywords":"Personality; Extraversion and introversion; Demographic economics; Consumption (sociology); German; Economics; Psychology; Big Five personality traits; Social psychology; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.02525010745904176,"score_gpt":0.27309402501993424,"score_spread":0.24784391756089247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136234506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954906,0.00028001107,0.00014847623,0.00015003515,0.0000063988527,0.000006247584,0.0012602865,0.0000063906386,0.0026515455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99915147,0.00006335469,0.000026514188,0.000009024062,0.00000498336,0.0000014454025,0.00045719228,7.901419e-7,0.00028523168],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959475,0.00016318283,0.000034022403,0.000049255592,0.00008096562,0.00007781643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941462,0.0020245234,0.0023134467,0.00036599033,0.00021876105,0.00093098497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083455176,0.00013831751,0.00025396745,0.0010807161,0.00033638178,0.0009182159,0.00015609946,0.00023163715,0.007048437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005402732,0.0000940359,0.00021340598,0.0011472682,0.00029027124,0.0004395439,0.0007090576,0.0003698217,0.000462243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056603385,0.00003522023,0.9949281,0.000009478619,0.00006155113,0.00006200366,0.00014503172,0.0002489649,0.00008475275,0.00052591646,0.0002721854,0.0035701287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024281003,0.000022244589,0.99887687,0.000004988124,0.000009051779,0.000049345614,0.00014627303,0.0001971851,0.000024895158,0.0002771859,0.00038748237,0.0000021191338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024842694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002981417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007048437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023619142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012642141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023579359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136982634","doi":"10.12927/hcq.2013.22946","title":"From Rose-Coloured Glasses to Reality: Addressing the Family Policy Deficit in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare Quarterly","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Learning Partnership","funders":"","keywords":"Rose (mathematics); Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Psychology; Family medicine","score_opus":0.07743646029839733,"score_gpt":0.3572896352949012,"score_spread":0.27985317499650386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136982634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45449412,0.010404013,0.0005165126,0.449868,0.0009259921,0.00006784974,0.0004923216,0.00003834157,0.083192825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714121,0.0033185775,0.00036485455,0.014143811,0.00008201425,0.000026504145,0.000075067044,0.000024202087,0.010552856],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952618,0.00071976637,0.00008475321,0.00020413459,0.0008481397,0.0028814028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99045545,0.0013494344,0.0003734953,0.00015363016,0.002023065,0.0056450344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042091813,0.0002750527,0.00056107674,0.0012027251,0.024576835,0.008149936,0.0027342623,0.0035994037,0.010145821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014498926,0.00033673365,0.00043364326,0.0023159513,0.006782081,0.0032233298,0.0063797277,0.00627222,0.00028922345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040282457,0.0005303684,0.087505795,0.00077897904,0.00010267737,0.0018569753,0.18116798,0.002059321,0.0012296657,0.22807942,0.2601763,0.23610967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008341652,0.00012410535,0.15903841,0.001665832,0.0001084448,0.00024761164,0.4207881,0.0014719013,0.0005729939,0.020621069,0.39506704,0.00021099542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17466716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17466716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38525972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9572691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137705737","doi":"10.7202/011392ar","title":"Réactions des contribuables aux variations des taux marginaux d’impôt : une étude portant sur des données de panel au Canada","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of British Columbia; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07344523950350619,"score_gpt":0.2622078604704621,"score_spread":0.1887626209669559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137705737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718777,0.0015799339,0.0035530399,0.0009241262,0.000031456457,0.000093796625,0.014061353,0.00007345525,0.0078050117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725657,0.0013565412,0.0014865968,0.00019855628,0.000019786774,0.00007378158,0.0084104305,0.000036612484,0.015851937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805236,0.0005179118,0.00008259889,0.00034991567,0.0006483122,0.0003489022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98906845,0.0055786725,0.0012502464,0.0007513295,0.003010249,0.0003410153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030354273,0.00043609593,0.00065078674,0.0008089003,0.0012032213,0.0022218167,0.0008157973,0.0006178604,0.005955595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106318565,0.00041001634,0.0010881372,0.003695166,0.0006305135,0.0006224654,0.0007627288,0.0007883211,0.00043322187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081900996,0.00007094199,0.9419142,0.00030822263,0.00108132,0.00029023454,0.002987194,0.0209477,0.0016802831,0.0022942643,0.006128389,0.021478137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034144126,0.000048121045,0.96986085,0.000071081544,0.00030474467,0.000039771734,0.0022295439,0.008974542,0.0010266514,0.00050495326,0.016855942,0.000049661547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9720917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96984863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027908325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0110160075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012626309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07992715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138043912","doi":"10.21083/surg.v6i1.1826","title":"Educational assortative mating in the United States and the effect on income inequality by household from 1960 to 2005","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SURG Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Assortative mating; Microdata (statistics); Economics; Economic inequality; Inequality; Educational attainment; Demographic economics; Census; Welfare state; Gini coefficient; Population; Economic growth; Demography; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.02116509897805323,"score_gpt":0.2984428643778489,"score_spread":0.27727776539979565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138043912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934285,0.0011057183,0.00009892666,0.0008300258,0.000026915826,0.0000033934298,0.0016671267,0.000007468398,0.0028318902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99814117,0.0004025436,0.000038081052,0.00006228861,0.000016950144,0.0000036247982,0.00072588574,0.0000010334724,0.00060841424],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972254,0.00006683993,0.000019480194,0.000041462856,0.00003889759,0.000110870234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988858,0.0001583098,0.0005095013,0.000045927947,0.00012859491,0.00027180713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041511093,0.00011912656,0.00016196501,0.0009470093,0.0006510833,0.0005505736,0.00022745873,0.00023953746,0.0024116142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016157536,0.0000693155,0.00024712825,0.0016474718,0.00030374213,0.00040270376,0.000786738,0.0005879287,0.0002041603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056500783,0.00008413158,0.9799737,0.00001634333,0.000043315034,0.00010720595,0.0006971674,0.0003554625,0.00007043549,0.001231931,0.0019441261,0.015419647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013963986,0.000025591098,0.997635,0.000020509422,0.000010353514,0.000037587863,0.00047387832,0.00017883648,0.00004354729,0.00010975051,0.0014611201,0.0000023654097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0735814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104567125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0735814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000891201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003966565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14630622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138506321","doi":"10.1162/1542476041423377","title":"The Married Widow: Marriage Penalties Matter!","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the European Economic Association","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Economics; Government (linguistics); Pension; Empirical evidence; Identification (biology); Labour economics; Demographic economics; Public economics; Political science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.009731034158325437,"score_gpt":0.22689563056019,"score_spread":0.21716459640186456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138506321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.887348,0.011179403,0.0010612119,0.05396748,0.0004853558,0.00004085077,0.0019029757,0.00002868553,0.04398616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990914,0.0016013202,0.00007252266,0.0018751904,0.00018843662,0.0000053071744,0.00023629704,0.0000060825582,0.0051008724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898285,0.00027083728,0.000041762945,0.00014075948,0.00023687618,0.00032687536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933461,0.0020102903,0.0028543472,0.00026260334,0.0005185493,0.0010081246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016427682,0.00018647913,0.0004247093,0.0005563754,0.0019161016,0.0018077546,0.00050575176,0.0010281589,0.019340716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012067324,0.0001245253,0.00028840866,0.0012992102,0.001550503,0.0018253408,0.0011067205,0.0013755378,0.0009215965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045999326,0.00015148614,0.8644231,0.00015266187,0.00026618384,0.000319912,0.0043285373,0.00045849234,0.0002670934,0.025485855,0.018099317,0.08558738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003693737,0.00014151415,0.9368281,0.0002462337,0.00025309433,0.0001706996,0.012552293,0.0006440747,0.00034990997,0.012650314,0.0360923,0.000034529075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16272518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23585416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16272518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011517368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022810933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.323556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139023613","doi":"10.3138/cpp.34.1.037","title":"Welfare Policy, Language Group, and the Duration of Lone Motherhood Spells","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Statistics Canada; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Welfare; Welfare state; Duration (music); Welfare reform; Demography; Preference; Sample (material); Economics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013942233588582141,"score_gpt":0.2508567189635893,"score_spread":0.23691448537500714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139023613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99703,0.00016143467,0.00009598562,0.000276916,0.000004449543,0.0000115330295,0.0013969315,0.0000062585464,0.0010164196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969764,0.00012389407,0.00007851968,0.00003622777,0.0000035708908,0.000012723901,0.0015626953,0.000002638565,0.0012033393],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993024,0.00012444191,0.00002961299,0.0000775723,0.00012705338,0.00033884664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99452484,0.0010583849,0.0023417985,0.00022684404,0.00055674167,0.0012913487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018466294,0.00013654605,0.00036837466,0.0012367647,0.0022141195,0.0013097086,0.00071109005,0.00046807123,0.0041003986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074615157,0.000128984,0.00036421855,0.0013437823,0.00069076894,0.00042560394,0.00086401653,0.0009207272,0.00036899888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007198427,0.000049422855,0.9931331,0.0000073346623,0.000038111124,0.00009306577,0.00089607626,0.00044798196,0.000047421552,0.0003872443,0.0007560803,0.0040721963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056538393,0.000031152158,0.99466234,0.000025317204,0.00001772679,0.000036073507,0.0030675274,0.0009969827,0.00003389962,0.00017309422,0.0009412787,0.000009077128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78475094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8615646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21524906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053237067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004297349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4330334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139035564","doi":"","title":"Taxpayers' Response to Tax Rate Changes: A Canadian Panel Study","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Economics; Income tax; Gross income; Tax rate; Adjusted gross income; Tax revenue; State income tax; Tax evasion; Welfare economics; Labour economics; Econometrics; Tax reform; Demographic economics; Public economics; Monetary economics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.028410113222269457,"score_gpt":0.2602762384659635,"score_spread":0.23186612524369402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139035564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98314524,0.00045700767,0.00013655645,0.000780823,0.000016142978,0.00007587453,0.011288424,0.000012213631,0.004087698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843501,0.00091080944,0.0005407294,0.00021233386,0.000011353869,0.000051041203,0.007516616,0.000010969278,0.0063959113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926907,0.000112609334,0.000028388211,0.00011582274,0.00026553436,0.000208652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975949,0.00035783768,0.00035589386,0.00018730463,0.0011429013,0.00036120514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016399254,0.00030804393,0.00053525605,0.001373172,0.00254627,0.0013665506,0.00096780126,0.0007722339,0.004917925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038037605,0.00046753522,0.0007076157,0.0055567794,0.00045726015,0.00052335527,0.00048339705,0.0010907468,0.0006801815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043392624,0.00027956572,0.96434736,0.00007459918,0.0002972348,0.00016381491,0.004180602,0.0017398474,0.00039292808,0.00082446646,0.012195968,0.015069614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032693464,0.000026652979,0.99065256,0.000024748246,0.000077608434,0.000020989666,0.0016179321,0.0016803669,0.00006571979,0.00007034712,0.005700324,0.00003000318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025165046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025165046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022375403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18258601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139121804","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00413.x","title":"Tax incentives and fertility in Canada: quantum vs tempo effects","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Allowance (engineering); Fertility; Incentive; Demographic economics; Demography; Rest (music); Economics; Medicine; Sociology; Operations management; Population","score_opus":0.058565756521485324,"score_gpt":0.1994010680988114,"score_spread":0.14083531157732607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139121804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97474366,0.0018718287,0.0007012159,0.004138063,0.000058271682,0.00006336694,0.0027880035,0.000034520282,0.015601155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948342,0.0005275349,0.0001772719,0.00016647484,0.000009569291,0.000008251503,0.00034102873,0.000006513323,0.0039291624],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886274,0.00022112684,0.00002028548,0.0001161666,0.000274658,0.000504999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949496,0.0014254391,0.00086718565,0.00028443633,0.001569771,0.00090368075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015794775,0.0001705056,0.00043466425,0.0011076992,0.0024799446,0.0013932767,0.0007836698,0.00055853237,0.0073811538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006843606,0.00016392155,0.0005144706,0.0018711078,0.0015247668,0.0004635131,0.000892077,0.0008113933,0.0001565232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060108403,0.00027107788,0.9186112,0.00007659211,0.00024030122,0.00016422024,0.0013532753,0.007935607,0.0010940423,0.02628518,0.006986093,0.036381267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040712184,0.000060392795,0.98555887,0.000037676968,0.00008546667,0.000025858057,0.001203194,0.0028113476,0.00031276813,0.0016954322,0.008137722,0.000030565796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035193257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035193257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040489115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25534612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139226207","doi":"10.1007/s10834-009-9158-7","title":"Family Responsibilities, Productivity, and Earnings: A Study of Gender Differences Among Canadian Lawyers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Productivity; Family-friendly; Earnings; Affect (linguistics); Human capital; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Relevance (law); Business; Accounting; Economics; Economic growth; Political science; Psychology; Law; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03958247724315573,"score_gpt":0.2868391064029316,"score_spread":0.24725662915977586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139226207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988036,0.00013954517,0.000011667905,0.00015407593,0.0000045395736,0.00001041462,0.00010696167,5.69171e-7,0.00076871517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859256,0.00021493742,0.00004294376,0.00009658541,0.000004212462,0.000012678592,0.000106570515,0.0000013768422,0.00092814496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860543,0.00016553154,0.000048318783,0.00010658927,0.00033553207,0.0007385572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960716,0.00082090247,0.00074787263,0.0000871578,0.0011153194,0.0011572446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017308193,0.0003608464,0.0004576768,0.0020346446,0.009526048,0.0018815974,0.0015486298,0.00096385216,0.0033398375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005623902,0.000566712,0.00049217505,0.004133827,0.0019093915,0.0010572008,0.0012807468,0.0015859379,0.00022407983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014147583,0.00041990244,0.9356684,0.000018855206,0.00002560955,0.00023385494,0.054328643,0.000044220014,0.00022453777,0.00033635055,0.00081765425,0.007740417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008345744,0.000054177654,0.94848293,0.000027224001,0.000011997854,0.000050513096,0.050045732,0.000072333074,0.000034029126,0.000047923317,0.0011512405,0.00001353145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9813983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025407566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025407566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029410934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18434566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139262544","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2006.08.011","title":"Trying to Find the Quickest Way: Employed Mothers’ Constructions of Time for Food","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":242,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Scarcity; Provisioning; Snowball sampling; Grounded theory; Wage; Feeling; Time allocation; Metropolitan area; Psychology; Order (exchange); Ethnic group; Social psychology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Business; Economics; Medicine; Computer science; Labour economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02901207267136346,"score_gpt":0.3339907688801135,"score_spread":0.30497869620875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139262544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97876203,0.00038023136,0.00094146177,0.0049304613,0.00006380025,0.000008966745,0.000012120948,0.000007666591,0.014893235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998211,0.000096321906,0.00017773677,0.000200853,0.0000065459108,0.000005366792,0.000002917988,0.000008036081,0.0012912684],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976743,0.0015060185,0.00006593582,0.000124195,0.00020444351,0.00042517605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941147,0.0037115512,0.0008336365,0.00027211048,0.00042654944,0.0006415261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005970035,0.00034076493,0.00028436226,0.0007580168,0.007955542,0.00554742,0.0009135198,0.0017526445,0.003069513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008896749,0.0005156727,0.00028622927,0.0005938442,0.011670361,0.0025751512,0.0035860483,0.0032720477,0.0002365714],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006274334,0.00004380738,0.010206662,0.000018734354,0.000007580546,0.0008656566,0.9720819,0.000019606116,0.00086029194,0.011964412,0.0004965009,0.003372134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001101928,0.000047915943,0.006135792,0.00005382928,0.000011626165,0.00041236088,0.9790285,0.00008977911,0.00034701522,0.002906576,0.010939937,0.000015718788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008289838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010404882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008289838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021451756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023097256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031572938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139476074","doi":"10.1111/0008-4085.00081","title":"In and out of the labour market: long‐term income consequences of child‐related interruptions to women's paid work","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Microdata (statistics); Humanities; Welfare economics; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Labour economics; Demography; Art; Census; Population; Economic growth","score_opus":0.05644429305961114,"score_gpt":0.20945602676461222,"score_spread":0.1530117337050011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139476074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995059,0.00068424066,0.000025998042,0.0010021457,0.000011588762,0.0000074069826,0.0010912773,0.0000028510556,0.002115465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976292,0.0003274149,0.000023603207,0.00007003784,0.000008525295,0.0000041409485,0.00053063396,0.0000020371224,0.0014043489],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994405,0.00004233624,0.000016910555,0.000049438193,0.00013826016,0.00031256184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978346,0.0002898163,0.0008347438,0.000068162655,0.00033986504,0.0006327955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006868656,0.00018290419,0.0002631342,0.0007325484,0.0013345375,0.0012743524,0.0009783864,0.0005761818,0.0047031217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030261513,0.0001763265,0.00032689483,0.001462862,0.0009753513,0.00032503862,0.0008327703,0.00062589376,0.0003192724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019214026,0.000044568944,0.9866116,0.00002851025,0.00004516898,0.00031147135,0.0022140932,0.00029214995,0.00019816346,0.00039319895,0.001952026,0.00771693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002706271,0.000010472668,0.9975672,0.000009299051,0.0000075520693,0.000021317046,0.0017889998,0.000081640326,0.000016163805,0.000036664544,0.0004550439,0.0000030834221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89078796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94229054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89078796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009787914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053511155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21971035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139559906","doi":"10.1177/0020715207083339","title":"Employment Insecurity at Labour Market Entry and Its Impact on Parental Home Leaving and Family Formation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Nuclear family; Economics; Scale (ratio); Economic growth; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.037297939671866565,"score_gpt":0.37360606476457575,"score_spread":0.3363081250927092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139559906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988668,0.00029305287,0.000031681382,0.00009804412,0.0000045154343,0.0000016013987,0.000045006647,6.5790687e-7,0.0006586971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959797,0.00012656083,0.000014722583,0.000011215378,0.0000035940159,9.158637e-7,0.000033137065,5.1386274e-7,0.00021139155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991091,0.00034403,0.000044410008,0.00009993795,0.00010746099,0.00029500792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99409205,0.0014843565,0.002091224,0.0002239631,0.00023434583,0.0018739417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014497353,0.00019228469,0.0003968834,0.0007882993,0.0010267171,0.0013131564,0.00038116725,0.0004778944,0.004619937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051577976,0.00014890179,0.00040498594,0.0006309066,0.0011462742,0.0007052732,0.0014581347,0.0009023577,0.00030368133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012301937,0.00007103138,0.9923017,0.0000092222845,0.000029268107,0.0003094725,0.0019466552,0.000068903384,0.00009443023,0.00025941743,0.000068470334,0.00471835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018940124,0.00006504263,0.99627066,0.00001660552,0.00000927629,0.00013454353,0.003080863,0.00004434068,0.000028058841,0.00008812614,0.00025663944,0.0000039946626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009820411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015164324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009820411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052075175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057660765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019526482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140885219","doi":"","title":"Labor Supply, Wealth Dynamics, and Marriage Decisions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"California Center for Population Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Economics; Subsidy; Earned income tax credit; Welfare; Labour economics; Production (economics); Panel data; Labour supply; Microeconomics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.04840685869688801,"score_gpt":0.37803602923448665,"score_spread":0.32962917053759866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140885219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98963505,0.00014982939,0.004173313,0.0005400076,0.0000058709875,0.000021946576,0.0015204517,0.000009744142,0.003943712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970956,0.00020593473,0.0008584731,0.000038376762,0.000005414822,0.000017825521,0.0007119399,0.0000016818339,0.0010646695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997008,0.00016597011,0.000011161845,0.000045650664,0.000035403664,0.000041083695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987546,0.0008051792,0.00022973203,0.00009331903,0.00002979872,0.00008729204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009127816,0.00011501977,0.00029808775,0.0004542633,0.00033902275,0.0006872296,0.00020139609,0.00042554492,0.0048317504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003655396,0.00018204746,0.00026194996,0.00082304486,0.0002825977,0.0005982293,0.00056287757,0.0005367292,0.00032051027],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018874666,0.00034101307,0.8993801,0.000040173574,0.00020685332,0.00019974825,0.0008677525,0.0381776,0.0008898886,0.023294877,0.001933447,0.034479782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004288713,0.00020185039,0.86005723,0.000053240652,0.000094017334,0.00016400997,0.0008532346,0.10321259,0.00051754876,0.028397962,0.006369144,0.00003625514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009458803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014438397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009458803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005384268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032470477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01880753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141214233","doi":"10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00072.x","title":"Race, Bureaucratic Discretion, and the Implementation of Welfare Reform","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Welfare reform; Discretion; Sanctions; Context (archaeology); Welfare; Demographic economics; Political science; Bureaucracy; Population; Politics; Sociology; Economics; Demography; Geography; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.008628040850171454,"score_gpt":0.32848884598884365,"score_spread":0.3198608051386722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141214233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94755095,0.00043256427,0.001413689,0.0055941176,0.000036735255,0.000031377072,0.000019657922,0.000014855401,0.044906083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998995,0.00005476003,0.00011235675,0.00016976304,0.000015284764,0.000009696704,0.0000028261895,0.0000025638171,0.0006379004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98925495,0.0060986746,0.00033747245,0.00055604574,0.0012387716,0.002514063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98189074,0.0074024843,0.0059298538,0.0012040837,0.0015390642,0.0020336718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011142528,0.00009439634,0.00023819966,0.00088586734,0.0045773652,0.0038505152,0.00057530083,0.0007855844,0.0028518739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030662788,0.00015928145,0.00017232723,0.00066602946,0.005550904,0.001449582,0.0029231273,0.0014641156,0.00015423038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041209083,0.00095791183,0.2795172,0.00015423288,0.00010721164,0.00048578766,0.0334021,0.0070805424,0.0040214164,0.5449122,0.0037452905,0.12520403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019299072,0.00059800653,0.7461846,0.0005262081,0.00009876678,0.00017063659,0.036096875,0.008620015,0.003278451,0.14619815,0.057918593,0.00011668587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0140200965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024339134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0140200965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006202262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007391974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058928013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141680180","doi":"10.7202/013470ar","title":"Effets d’une réforme fiscale sur l’offre de travail des ménages dans un cadre collectif simulé","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020802663314890342,"score_gpt":0.238141342929457,"score_spread":0.21733867961456665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141680180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97529274,0.0006248039,0.007518118,0.0010004364,0.0000275535,0.00009520723,0.00076008576,0.000053354594,0.014627645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844454,0.00045211852,0.0028467549,0.00007728738,0.000012047746,0.00009326764,0.00034408717,0.00001862267,0.011710277],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873704,0.0006515701,0.000050959432,0.00018061278,0.00017078186,0.00020905104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938128,0.0032531274,0.0012759906,0.0006060637,0.00066093466,0.00039105458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025409285,0.00053796225,0.0008549922,0.0007135896,0.00094879343,0.0022160439,0.0011684408,0.0008622581,0.019125884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064517814,0.0003692473,0.0010792526,0.0011288906,0.0010411716,0.0015207648,0.0013240232,0.0011043756,0.00082389545],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023749033,0.0011689484,0.30921787,0.00095500133,0.0014473168,0.000707088,0.0066692545,0.35115862,0.005043545,0.25248662,0.003269941,0.06550088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011209938,0.0037317516,0.48769048,0.0009415502,0.0018885506,0.00044283998,0.020428171,0.2754755,0.007848292,0.11226294,0.087819025,0.000349968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060896225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073785424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060896225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00445963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003172072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1210835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142428142","doi":"10.7202/013467ar","title":"Discrimination sexuelle dans les dépenses des ménages : survol de la littérature et évidences empiriques pour le Canada","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03663752867563275,"score_gpt":0.28271223530522127,"score_spread":0.24607470662958852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142428142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7927823,0.1295756,0.0034668702,0.017828085,0.0004423897,0.00022847034,0.00804816,0.00006768413,0.047560435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.936007,0.04706203,0.0015496712,0.001997581,0.00015947665,0.0000854746,0.0022660787,0.000059330534,0.010813414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939705,0.0011882712,0.0003472889,0.0008635027,0.0023229858,0.0013074386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97636265,0.009305532,0.0029080343,0.0013917497,0.00885913,0.0011728776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010220032,0.00069028453,0.0014698564,0.0048570763,0.0042334246,0.003991101,0.00196351,0.0009072842,0.009656586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01829147,0.000566119,0.001482553,0.009327498,0.0036816332,0.001470249,0.0015865065,0.0018348082,0.00054861774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028870517,0.000094931595,0.8966011,0.00078966713,0.00070172886,0.00032331716,0.008935906,0.00047539367,0.00018512228,0.008756066,0.005145087,0.077703044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039062743,0.00009258641,0.954291,0.0015413574,0.00079136994,0.00015987949,0.010291854,0.00093659066,0.00043392947,0.0014504722,0.029903583,0.00006826867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036978208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036978208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0954209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26829696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142734701","doi":"10.7202/010170ar","title":"Les enfants des mères seules : précarité économique et politiques sociales","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04707937712515666,"score_gpt":0.3009801918209964,"score_spread":0.25390081469583975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142734701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8612891,0.028735092,0.0006476377,0.042286087,0.00013965627,0.00002625966,0.00019068553,0.000011615509,0.06667396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839463,0.0084046805,0.00026466933,0.0007448555,0.000055745008,0.000018614719,0.000032944616,0.0000029737828,0.006529271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994708,0.00023375149,0.000014355247,0.00005746531,0.000055144446,0.00016857761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922657,0.000279206,0.00023281414,0.000023019844,0.00010905683,0.00012936475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010477827,0.00022339485,0.00021934458,0.00076380745,0.0026369246,0.0019442415,0.00028566088,0.0009006693,0.0033950035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015250325,0.00014909444,0.00013917216,0.0007713925,0.0032233805,0.0018660884,0.0015760694,0.0010161366,0.00016189153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020592466,0.00017377337,0.23992829,0.0007493491,0.00008867265,0.0035389778,0.25562945,0.00070290756,0.0029476958,0.38550228,0.010649555,0.09988321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021367408,0.00024575932,0.4935201,0.0024234003,0.000094252166,0.0016836816,0.2507254,0.00046994048,0.0010618058,0.026174495,0.22350506,0.00007472867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08083084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16948293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9191692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003947555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031407916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1607207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143369209","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.12.014","title":"A quantitative theory of the gender gap in wages","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; University of Toronto; University of Southampton; Arizona State University; University of Pennsylvania; Universidad de Alicante; University of Southern California","keywords":"Human capital; Wage; Economics; Fertility; Gender gap; Labour economics; Human capital theory; Work (physics); Work hours; Rest (music); Working hours; Demographic economics; Population; Sociology; Demography; Medicine","score_opus":0.08802190479213197,"score_gpt":0.3183815101258161,"score_spread":0.23035960533368416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143369209","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14108801,0.12098547,0.44773778,0.091825,0.0027914972,0.00015886423,0.0024305924,0.00018043838,0.19280238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9428533,0.026866283,0.013956564,0.0025847189,0.0019267256,0.00023117432,0.0004965173,0.000072019175,0.011012809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968917,0.0017838047,0.000112016736,0.00032387994,0.00062736444,0.0002611914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98946303,0.008926567,0.0004137477,0.00038727437,0.00065277057,0.00015659972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00694086,0.00057213934,0.0012187567,0.0034308138,0.0008222786,0.002737399,0.0018611922,0.0022131284,0.012411522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014965111,0.00029662828,0.00087823276,0.0031041277,0.005394209,0.004904861,0.0016572688,0.0020940895,0.0006317776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016216714,0.000036727168,0.0010744235,0.0001653529,0.000029543662,0.000019007524,0.00018089061,0.004074627,0.00006712116,0.97502804,0.0025018267,0.016806114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010210984,0.000025770882,0.0035551712,0.00021437071,0.000016264858,0.000039483577,0.000405729,0.0071675517,0.000037641446,0.9786476,0.00986929,0.000010899119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029634938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017541227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012411522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024646232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022648273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041520715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143551151","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2010.01599.x","title":"The impact of the Self‐Sufficiency Project on the employment behaviour of former welfare recipients","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Subsidy; Random assignment; Welfare; Self-employment; Economics; Randomized experiment; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Percentage point; Order (exchange); Entrepreneurship; Finance; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.08058159229291512,"score_gpt":0.2368186879882703,"score_spread":0.15623709569535518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143551151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952348,0.00057410344,0.00014809745,0.00093407364,0.000040204362,0.00008956791,0.00018872407,0.0000106732305,0.0027797194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904853,0.00013744646,0.00008401196,0.000106533196,0.000009630921,0.000039007802,0.000038467628,0.000001219242,0.0005352587],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982481,0.0011294066,0.000032793385,0.000076803524,0.00017058094,0.00034230904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971756,0.0012321594,0.00044612712,0.00014662548,0.00018592204,0.0008135562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003331171,0.00020337634,0.0004579744,0.00031187397,0.000704645,0.00049582607,0.00041742998,0.0006998122,0.006656652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00873511,0.000095074596,0.00067018636,0.00035797615,0.0007760286,0.00028683795,0.000503451,0.00071518676,0.0001843128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.20124614,0.034149397,0.19618918,0.0012896147,0.0017782474,0.0004067707,0.0026808388,0.01626695,0.0037669523,0.010144878,0.011167148,0.5209139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.038829662,0.12421225,0.7802355,0.001034347,0.0023014673,0.00024726542,0.004553111,0.02497173,0.0029841256,0.0091881,0.0113076195,0.00013478713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083441265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074231185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91655874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021812203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046430468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16591114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143811048","doi":"10.1111/roiw.12119","title":"Gender Patterns and Value of Unpaid Care Work: Findings From<scp>C</scp>hina's First Large‐Scale Time Use Survey","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Income and Wealth","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Unpaid work; Economics; Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Labour economics; Time-use survey; Paid work; Work hours; Demographic economics; Care work; Consumption (sociology); Working hours; Statistics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020672859091316078,"score_gpt":0.28232119963110536,"score_spread":0.2616483405397893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143811048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862453,0.0075433645,0.00021322223,0.00040452552,0.00002357261,0.000013208553,0.0012108396,0.000002573619,0.0043434184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905257,0.006626865,0.00016976376,0.00012861614,0.000026602795,0.000023020251,0.00071463466,0.000004155591,0.0017805917],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994843,0.0001902793,0.000041990676,0.00006824644,0.00015905286,0.00005612723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997417,0.00085529743,0.0010858732,0.00006424735,0.0004031702,0.00017429281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012801418,0.00009701896,0.00022026965,0.0013076994,0.00029746344,0.00056274177,0.0002840339,0.0001926622,0.0015600898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036579221,0.00011059293,0.00014510224,0.0026655826,0.00023999832,0.00040209,0.0004935372,0.0002553692,0.00025141155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055131964,0.000026665948,0.96451914,0.00012853881,0.00003942291,0.000112811016,0.0042173015,0.00005674274,0.00012673551,0.00037390043,0.0017623638,0.028581128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.1999623e-7,0.000011685536,0.9943778,0.000046065074,0.0000061796823,0.000046204634,0.0034915744,0.00002968217,0.000026002403,0.000043955723,0.0019172038,0.0000029197213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029997362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0929159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029997362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005028002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005359501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059645474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145535529","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00466.x","title":"THE EFFECTS OF SINGLE MOTHERS' WELFARE USE AND EMPLOYMENT DECISIONS ON CHILDREN'S COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Welfare; Economics; Single mothers; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Cognition; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Test (biology); Labour economics; Developmental psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0373026475440949,"score_gpt":0.2811244426921133,"score_spread":0.24382179514801838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145535529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971693,0.00029140315,0.00009834787,0.00034516156,0.0000065157983,0.0000048062766,0.00070926914,0.0000034405205,0.00137184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99744785,0.0002808874,0.00009768036,0.000034596673,0.0000069422176,0.000011071564,0.00034614495,0.0000017123451,0.0017730914],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940634,0.00016055387,0.000031879335,0.00007882734,0.000087942455,0.0002343909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264574,0.0030759128,0.003231563,0.00018044976,0.00019976786,0.00066654733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012694527,0.00029775142,0.0002831295,0.00059254165,0.00034404307,0.0008220882,0.0005226459,0.00048358395,0.007140869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050731874,0.0001786915,0.0005701209,0.0008001126,0.0004045694,0.00031768318,0.0009877444,0.0006269487,0.00035238385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021061805,0.0001427059,0.9839871,0.000029616045,0.00015524904,0.00043225763,0.000310384,0.0019593239,0.0003286955,0.0011457079,0.0005680681,0.010730328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011548915,0.00013209459,0.99603146,0.000026456664,0.0000631238,0.00007047236,0.00067296904,0.0017605729,0.0002277676,0.00035424728,0.0006434121,0.0000057878137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03699195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05976757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03699195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011111366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006197388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073553264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146921874","doi":"","title":"Why Have Real Wages Lagged Labour Productivity Growth in Canada?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Real wages; Economics; Labour economics; Efficiency wage; Macroeconomics; Wage","score_opus":0.028005783221162706,"score_gpt":0.2629567123037114,"score_spread":0.23495092908254872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146921874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33439654,0.08665847,0.0031293274,0.3891059,0.0045094,0.00013207107,0.0265648,0.00058150326,0.15492204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9279867,0.028474832,0.0018897293,0.014386328,0.00069422985,0.000043110584,0.00606173,0.00019785682,0.020265438],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945986,0.00017877639,0.00021934495,0.00060268946,0.0028235083,0.0015770831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98606515,0.000932317,0.0010993171,0.0003101281,0.009711104,0.0018820188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034544098,0.00061549677,0.0007729834,0.0038453483,0.0063778507,0.006085356,0.0021000057,0.0014356456,0.007153185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014918826,0.00047012276,0.0006646573,0.012229179,0.002345664,0.0030220253,0.0019070839,0.004865572,0.0006859799],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005038952,0.00010189447,0.34285405,0.0013745992,0.00022388806,0.00089469954,0.00833857,0.002956835,0.0006482025,0.111058936,0.21557377,0.31547067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050168444,0.00007321763,0.68060845,0.0016099324,0.00013206864,0.00024380565,0.010818794,0.003894926,0.00092304224,0.010216732,0.29122427,0.00020456754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1513601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1513601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15560737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.984302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147297979","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1001361","title":"Work, Rest, and Play: Exploring Trends in Time Allocation in Canada and the United States","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Rest (music); Work (physics); Political science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.02067902269025388,"score_gpt":0.2333590481286182,"score_spread":0.21268002543836434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147297979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929264,0.00070269115,0.000068092195,0.000645689,0.000017681412,0.000021616746,0.0025209954,0.000006722272,0.003090092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995981,0.00059799553,0.00009749458,0.00013944373,0.0000066603848,0.000019150406,0.001228967,0.000008107369,0.0019211933],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989513,0.00009591092,0.000050355502,0.00010760727,0.00024032686,0.00055443245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642617,0.00029979154,0.0004679684,0.000061348284,0.001532029,0.0012126248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086232467,0.00027086883,0.00057005836,0.0036245259,0.005680227,0.0026582466,0.0022017467,0.0007982224,0.0029426056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003078064,0.00026571297,0.0004930729,0.010603809,0.001539254,0.0009904569,0.0019218515,0.0012084426,0.00023872805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017628519,0.00007641739,0.9733965,0.000041410036,0.00004617562,0.00007292236,0.010689419,0.00017324026,0.00015497406,0.0006497204,0.002251211,0.01227173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003508189,0.000016863043,0.9703569,0.00003980278,0.000011998068,0.00001880914,0.027183771,0.00018758312,0.000058020058,0.000044982524,0.0020655023,0.000012235934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99677354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030447066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030447066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043212768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22090995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148418564","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.890283","title":"Modes of Spousal Interaction and the Labor Market Environment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Economics; Context (archaeology); Outcome (game theory); Welfare; Aggregate (composite); Sample (material); Mode (computer interface); Microeconomics; Labour economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.00787187772103635,"score_gpt":0.2481741515352763,"score_spread":0.24030227381423996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148418564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98724824,0.00020263584,0.000411966,0.00034133872,0.00000581431,0.0000071336312,0.000096300166,0.000004478167,0.011682114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991974,0.00006629968,0.000050949286,0.000013701978,0.00000499438,0.0000047198573,0.000017711718,0.0000018866965,0.0006423835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999276,0.0004300954,0.000020236994,0.0000510113,0.00006205378,0.00016057826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813795,0.0010996786,0.0003592667,0.00008076316,0.00006673501,0.0002555822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092984724,0.0001514934,0.00017001711,0.001154677,0.0014729039,0.0022125652,0.00023763368,0.0004960057,0.008932229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036610814,0.00017561743,0.000111313326,0.00073294505,0.0013109797,0.00094120565,0.0010603429,0.00044198247,0.0004098153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001304164,0.00047383367,0.8159555,0.000057385983,0.00006410929,0.0012913455,0.07542318,0.0005999509,0.0028317631,0.046438687,0.0020059564,0.053554174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056817342,0.0002945949,0.82205623,0.00009731334,0.000029993336,0.0011803467,0.13411209,0.0020274145,0.00063657993,0.031373397,0.008088267,0.000046958674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00181174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028770005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008932229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047670762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043482715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029881299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148455532","doi":"10.1007/s001480100073","title":"\"Living in sin\" and marriage: A matching model","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Matching (statistics); Social policy; Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03256569957431372,"score_gpt":0.26732040267660284,"score_spread":0.23475470310228913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148455532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7955632,0.0018083946,0.12618084,0.023869079,0.00046246202,0.0004556104,0.002243733,0.00030868003,0.04910805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95927525,0.0011052708,0.0037282603,0.0006947892,0.00025182994,0.00014016646,0.00038270245,0.000030523737,0.034391258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979207,0.0010109266,0.000065772896,0.00033020237,0.00011371009,0.0005587429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99236006,0.0045489715,0.0011949906,0.00038854385,0.0002892688,0.0012182912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050708074,0.0010155351,0.002996707,0.00154249,0.002758433,0.004605581,0.0044836444,0.0072743935,0.027257368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01392624,0.0010194824,0.001383522,0.0031965917,0.002817374,0.0040068226,0.0029504152,0.0033154103,0.0029728906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014310877,0.002425406,0.04347875,0.00023950636,0.00049601705,0.0021469346,0.002872752,0.20790935,0.0005741072,0.68684757,0.01602154,0.035556994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007259489,0.00035845826,0.005927676,0.00006535927,0.00029510754,0.0005101375,0.002235283,0.6420647,0.000099685705,0.34353563,0.004083979,0.00009805359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023475973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01661684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027257368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024612185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026736406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091184914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149197207","doi":"10.25336/p6m90p","title":"Examining the determinants of union dissolution among married and common-law unions in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Employment and Social Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Odds; Demographic economics; Economics; Political science; Labour economics; Law; Economic growth; Logistic regression; Statistics","score_opus":0.06489061136422779,"score_gpt":0.3118070783811115,"score_spread":0.2469164670168837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149197207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99746084,0.0003149466,0.00007919172,0.00025787542,0.000005888445,0.000016544851,0.00073100044,0.0000030143487,0.001130562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795616,0.00026973963,0.00007195538,0.000032745236,0.0000027014614,0.0000067425044,0.0008006388,0.0000023091757,0.00085687044],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853516,0.00011402909,0.00006979399,0.00017026327,0.00043174718,0.0006790633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632996,0.00030193536,0.0008721547,0.00014117283,0.0011423419,0.0012124315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010594674,0.00022672882,0.0005212148,0.0017014926,0.0053698653,0.001680621,0.0016549402,0.0005435502,0.0028327438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045615234,0.00033413363,0.0005728198,0.0037170546,0.0010745494,0.0005309636,0.0021362244,0.0011629609,0.00018622489],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048430116,0.000034626664,0.9930131,0.000009863734,0.000024372057,0.0000557407,0.001679328,0.0001742925,0.0000716668,0.0003446566,0.00040836795,0.0041356855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043544696,0.0000137724755,0.993668,0.000024577488,0.000011521202,0.000028173714,0.0048020314,0.0004332578,0.000055476197,0.00005820685,0.00089216675,0.000008417043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023442667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023442667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030203396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1700893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149306621","doi":"10.1111/1467-9361.00176","title":"Publicly Provided Goods and Intrafamily Resource Allocation: Female Child Survival in India","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Development Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Child survival; Census; Morality; Production (economics); Literacy; Demographic economics; Economics; Child mortality; Logistic regression; Demography; Economic growth; Political science; Developing country; Sociology; Medicine; Population; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02071904744612236,"score_gpt":0.25783979350200376,"score_spread":0.2371207460558814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149306621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921577,0.0019464853,0.00020571062,0.00095869956,0.0000060636557,0.0000015746455,0.000080625694,0.0000030624055,0.004640164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998928,0.0005848141,0.000033371427,0.000022849586,0.0000047970216,6.7468017e-7,0.000015421545,5.5411476e-7,0.00040947506],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997403,0.000099049765,0.000007701407,0.000026677575,0.0000314578,0.000094759795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923706,0.00024983962,0.00033605265,0.00003933624,0.00005319859,0.00008446835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036207348,0.00011544446,0.00013715518,0.0007155628,0.00040056658,0.00083321723,0.00036276327,0.0003120819,0.0021363767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012227526,0.000089841364,0.00016968268,0.0009536312,0.0009828499,0.00039271865,0.0007977426,0.00033035234,0.00012829939],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002081353,0.000110618064,0.90161675,0.00010767027,0.00007678558,0.0009583312,0.0034475126,0.0031307552,0.000753141,0.03246229,0.0012699169,0.055858124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053411377,0.00007379509,0.9857131,0.000051622723,0.000037947786,0.00058010744,0.0032954882,0.0015857962,0.00030659587,0.005148742,0.0031905575,0.000010934686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020262659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032448456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020262659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013737902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054763193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04028946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150137566","doi":"10.3138/cpp.33.2.147","title":"Why Did Employment and Earnings Rise among Lone Mothers in Canada during the 1980s and 1990s?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Educational attainment; Earnings; Baby boom; Demographic economics; Census; Economics; Labour economics; Demography; Economic growth; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.009415403395903974,"score_gpt":0.2294119012976096,"score_spread":0.21999649790170564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150137566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722775,0.004099662,0.00005367413,0.012019088,0.000096179894,0.000017551025,0.0035834117,0.000010800217,0.007842066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994959,0.0014984703,0.00004258741,0.00062043587,0.00002790137,0.0000051434076,0.00079044903,0.0000046035216,0.0020514012],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988405,0.000037065314,0.000024475765,0.00009806912,0.00022294399,0.00077692897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796814,0.00010567768,0.00034103415,0.000048624224,0.0007712776,0.0007652386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010471881,0.00021112288,0.00040920824,0.0018316678,0.004712269,0.0019573094,0.0012136508,0.0009807107,0.0034043805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028105942,0.0002466384,0.00038162444,0.0034692956,0.0015044693,0.0007718811,0.000872267,0.0012127415,0.0003074457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015335243,0.000040848554,0.96630234,0.000041952262,0.00003454445,0.00022039619,0.004544166,0.00013629513,0.00019101516,0.0013651694,0.0070471484,0.019922785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046272303,0.000007795071,0.99068075,0.000041896878,0.0000100144625,0.000028801454,0.0051197996,0.00008369046,0.00005146886,0.00008646648,0.003875717,0.000008895716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99647826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04279906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04279906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042966764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31053036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150561875","doi":"10.1016/s0167-6296(03)00058-4","title":"Estimating price elasticities when there is smuggling: the sensitivity of smoking to price in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Price elasticity of demand; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Alcohol consumption; Context (archaeology); Econometrics; Elasticity (physics); Yield (engineering); Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Alcohol","score_opus":0.032520742387627755,"score_gpt":0.28079057994281154,"score_spread":0.24826983755518378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150561875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99668944,0.00024241536,0.0008799968,0.00048164948,0.000013925728,0.000031699783,0.00082309404,0.00002628235,0.0008115218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99736446,0.00012826113,0.0008679257,0.00006283421,0.000008396531,0.0000069031166,0.00072749995,0.00001797072,0.0008157658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974534,0.00070833944,0.00014700086,0.00044300762,0.00044850842,0.0007997361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97968274,0.012964051,0.0016561226,0.0009312258,0.0036016973,0.001164076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006436913,0.00070572604,0.0012970911,0.0015719577,0.0027062034,0.0031291726,0.003161143,0.0020475695,0.00226665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03387021,0.0009520498,0.0018101239,0.0042816917,0.0017974107,0.0012376633,0.0012488252,0.0022992888,0.00021780322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001256234,0.00048574148,0.8632016,0.000112716974,0.0010532115,0.0005554149,0.0010686083,0.10628691,0.00058127707,0.0037752127,0.0035459213,0.018077137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015827332,0.00012499178,0.6815606,0.00004474414,0.00050011644,0.000114167764,0.0025661562,0.30990696,0.00062923733,0.0021906532,0.0020482256,0.00015593992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99533916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027960945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027960945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026157562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2028718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150644089","doi":"","title":"A roundtable discussion on decentralization, local development and women’s empowerment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Universitas Forum","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Empowerment; Latin Americans; Political science; Context (archaeology); Poverty; Public relations; Economic growth; Sociology; Geography; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.012185525911419144,"score_gpt":0.24190185324767388,"score_spread":0.22971632733625474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150644089","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007318436,0.009745476,0.0013950666,0.7853881,0.17870964,0.00014129517,0.00011202712,0.00005435639,0.017135583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.189412,0.014011436,0.002710452,0.56102407,0.10855776,0.0010491663,0.00017045061,0.00028137202,0.12278332],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99123913,0.005681346,0.0002522191,0.0005234056,0.00087108364,0.0014328047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833839,0.012094892,0.0005618112,0.00030586962,0.0008212597,0.0028323017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015371266,0.0013299703,0.0008392811,0.0008590643,0.015788473,0.010535024,0.0028652085,0.022608202,0.019416424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015608217,0.0005189483,0.0018701365,0.0010611847,0.006839928,0.01193219,0.009285236,0.018832961,0.0019381468],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028037015,0.00016086704,0.00045065148,0.0005560729,0.000035030447,0.0019409722,0.05746527,0.00020107938,0.0017122161,0.09482698,0.8194392,0.02293125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027388676,0.0000895559,0.0006810042,0.00031246306,0.000012636532,0.0002150862,0.021689733,0.00008201121,0.00042185572,0.006439563,0.9699829,0.00004597057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002822912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005588995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022608202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007173132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045043607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08129197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150835394","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.967556","title":"Are Youths on Income Support Less Happy? Evidence from Australia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Income Support; Child support; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05358193022127024,"score_gpt":0.3348184153988461,"score_spread":0.2812364851775759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150835394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99140716,0.0036228986,0.000032548567,0.0010463906,0.000046911297,0.000019051811,0.00019908372,8.0783883e-7,0.0036252022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966882,0.0022988836,0.000046480258,0.00039838444,0.00003314889,0.000018929288,0.00008566934,0.0000023878376,0.00042795678],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967623,0.0014625858,0.00022146085,0.0003422761,0.00053792034,0.0006734715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846703,0.004695531,0.0058507035,0.00061458105,0.0025214287,0.0016474709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046619135,0.0003052616,0.00089528755,0.0014815603,0.0017852419,0.0016965314,0.001097134,0.00094703416,0.0038200968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015433693,0.00040966214,0.00072757807,0.002660766,0.0022337001,0.0009284591,0.0023634476,0.0014251439,0.00024020183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006951845,0.00024029975,0.96047115,0.00043373206,0.0003877925,0.0004564737,0.016548986,0.000032753884,0.00013898453,0.0007139647,0.0009680054,0.018912831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025617157,0.00012294887,0.98958546,0.0002856303,0.000163681,0.000074628035,0.00830585,0.000025825115,0.000028473376,0.00011042885,0.001263266,0.000008147294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22140531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29053575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22140531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015674767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002626766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44023323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151465340","doi":"","title":"The Economics of Marriage 30 Years after Becker","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positive economics; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01276140004645515,"score_gpt":0.24391283025064506,"score_spread":0.2311514302041899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151465340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09499031,0.1786046,0.1081482,0.21256088,0.0055481563,0.00012358035,0.00091915374,0.000084484265,0.3990207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8177421,0.053201847,0.008593248,0.009358329,0.0035643645,0.00010867001,0.00014739583,0.000054343684,0.10722965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939954,0.00030879816,0.000013614461,0.00008855175,0.000118408694,0.000071081646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917775,0.0005299924,0.000045124423,0.000058214628,0.00012017858,0.00006865773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001408252,0.00042269946,0.00058463373,0.00063014886,0.0013517143,0.0021667741,0.0005478293,0.0020806002,0.004344114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039460366,0.0003805052,0.00059361284,0.001613711,0.00654448,0.0036513675,0.0008902577,0.003188793,0.0007435268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000155788,0.000012717811,0.00013838382,0.000018996527,0.00000503573,0.000017962513,0.00014284838,0.0016620668,0.000022883743,0.9909939,0.002934878,0.0040346566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001604031,0.000015887988,0.00031624822,0.0000778868,0.000004635444,0.000018587294,0.000119716,0.001964868,0.000037209225,0.9523755,0.045040887,0.000012509349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023457896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009929877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023457896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069550364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002702722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050462604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151946145","doi":"","title":"Le financement des services de garde des enfants: effets sur le travail, le revenu des familles, et les finances publiques","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Income tax; Welfare economics; Political science; Child care; Tax deduction; Family income; Public funding; Economics; Gross income; Tax reform; Economic growth; Public economics; State income tax; Public administration","score_opus":0.02097770306673645,"score_gpt":0.24353846625807787,"score_spread":0.22256076319134144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151946145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.974919,0.0038561549,0.0005081021,0.0035164892,0.000034029294,0.00005358064,0.0017085256,0.000023119854,0.015380917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99073035,0.0017009616,0.00027305415,0.0001478686,0.000012036068,0.000037517973,0.0004521252,0.000005490606,0.0066406284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909294,0.00033409116,0.000015302483,0.000084991865,0.00017538051,0.00029730587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961557,0.001230353,0.00063885015,0.00008283408,0.00069498405,0.0011973211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013459584,0.00040933152,0.00047707083,0.0007552822,0.0010878174,0.0015009479,0.000689981,0.0006234872,0.009259471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066092946,0.0001283574,0.00045509028,0.0013187275,0.0007058531,0.0005967117,0.0013242181,0.00083811197,0.00039772195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007226749,0.00034391103,0.8592613,0.00055324816,0.0005075371,0.00074809225,0.006646682,0.004610591,0.0007809971,0.010530789,0.00720319,0.10809088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004474575,0.00034635002,0.97019035,0.00057950907,0.0002770462,0.00016392794,0.011591442,0.002042792,0.00037156127,0.0014192816,0.012950132,0.000022952183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7848489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8525323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21515107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012306296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01111319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43283623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152754212","doi":"10.1257/aer.104.11.3701","title":"Fertility Transitions Along the Extensive and Intensive Margins","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; Margin (machine learning); Opportunity cost; Demographic economics; Quality (philosophy); Labour economics; Population; Demography; Microeconomics; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.020965879603665586,"score_gpt":0.28730187611351493,"score_spread":0.26633599650984935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152754212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92032593,0.0005178129,0.036712866,0.003974134,0.000055498378,0.000109215114,0.0018265748,0.000088276225,0.036389735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911349,0.00020800144,0.0010627914,0.00014131927,0.000020936675,0.000032818396,0.00016994643,0.000009856389,0.007219428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967206,0.00007292241,0.000011918536,0.000092588474,0.00003624126,0.000114263916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986928,0.00039334787,0.00052364013,0.00009726576,0.000072099334,0.00022089787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009736417,0.0002166244,0.0004308106,0.00043790007,0.00070568564,0.0014301396,0.0006476621,0.00093652506,0.012325972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039374544,0.0003085204,0.00076921633,0.0004232359,0.0015828535,0.0020082882,0.0015689923,0.0014076936,0.0006428129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005400254,0.00035739806,0.088281676,0.000154151,0.00008954221,0.0009274658,0.0021557175,0.16695066,0.0029227694,0.693554,0.007657119,0.03640949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029586835,0.0005494419,0.16544168,0.00014728178,0.000103607985,0.0006358669,0.0035444999,0.18275201,0.0008570286,0.6269896,0.018573923,0.00010917051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009022505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008781022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012325972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013359841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068509456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041234493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154139850","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.01500.x","title":"Estimating labour supply elasticities under rationing: a structural model of time allocation behaviour","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationing; Time allocation; Economics; Wage; Work (physics); Sample (material); Labour supply; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Wage rate; Economic growth; Health care","score_opus":0.07419924410724899,"score_gpt":0.21521190358926615,"score_spread":0.14101265948201716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154139850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82432497,0.0001419742,0.17089818,0.00087228575,0.00002023936,0.00018764578,0.0008312747,0.00011915156,0.002604143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772398,0.00015001705,0.018362984,0.00006004068,0.00003607964,0.00018876277,0.0006450852,0.00004032986,0.0032767958],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748,0.0015717782,0.0000786343,0.0004531107,0.000113842565,0.00030271572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837535,0.013009096,0.0014887708,0.0011052322,0.0003463662,0.00029699158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007192303,0.00064570527,0.0015000285,0.0011957911,0.0005495805,0.0020824564,0.0017817486,0.0020686374,0.006281473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021443108,0.0011377935,0.002452854,0.0015602495,0.0014133764,0.001720403,0.001465348,0.0016136756,0.0008393679],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004153852,0.0002951185,0.031083347,0.00007178694,0.00023102983,0.00012658676,0.00050012785,0.9268958,0.00058434694,0.028171586,0.00049102685,0.011133823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092340684,0.00013085888,0.009121407,0.000016491102,0.0000538105,0.000032611395,0.00014887228,0.96506983,0.00008303504,0.024862364,0.0003659983,0.000022405684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026654815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014128967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026654815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022084445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015220114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052999318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154298374","doi":"","title":"Domestic Violence and Women's Autonomy: Evidence from India","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Reservation; Autonomy; Bargaining power; Resource (disambiguation); Resource allocation; Power (physics); Developing country; Economics; Poison control; Economic growth; Suicide prevention; Political science; Environmental health; Medicine; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.032844804594788515,"score_gpt":0.2765732493154975,"score_spread":0.24372844472070898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154298374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99005204,0.0011177615,0.00008810088,0.00067956554,0.000005533568,0.000005577325,0.00012974357,0.0000015471994,0.00792012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992879,0.0005220661,0.000014332664,0.000042117044,0.0000045225797,0.0000014237064,0.000026821615,6.1170397e-7,0.000100357676],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986104,0.0006649565,0.00007585123,0.00012745187,0.00022196946,0.0002993827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890204,0.0066752727,0.0029378622,0.00059084984,0.00038722294,0.00038840796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012100138,0.00015736886,0.00029375908,0.0010059265,0.0010217805,0.0013200188,0.0007111914,0.00031907155,0.0024116233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007934056,0.00022859036,0.000345969,0.002275559,0.003813851,0.00058685517,0.0018406922,0.0006983029,0.00016756852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022652556,0.00010362474,0.95511144,0.00019887138,0.00020906438,0.00071212125,0.01629469,0.0005597399,0.00012218027,0.008800408,0.00056299946,0.017098347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026304377,0.00011601001,0.97088856,0.00020449964,0.00016000954,0.000678155,0.021632276,0.00026136977,0.00019810315,0.0019218081,0.0038917363,0.000021233662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05199219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053877722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05199219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009414092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097648473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10337907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155298130","doi":"","title":"Welfare Reforms and the Living Standards of Single Mothers: Evidence from Canadian Provinces. *","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Difference in differences; Welfare; Propensity score matching; Standard of living; Natural experiment; Welfare reform; Matching (statistics); Demographic economics; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Control (management); Baseline (sea); Single mothers; Significant difference; Treatment and control groups; Impact evaluation; Public economics; Demography; Political science; Psychology; Econometrics; Statistics; Sociology","score_opus":0.031152737677958564,"score_gpt":0.312613417769626,"score_spread":0.2814606800916674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155298130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746951,0.005481059,0.00015485927,0.0021080002,0.000043482767,0.00004902387,0.008949759,0.000009720108,0.008509045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930363,0.002342075,0.00012507744,0.00014763184,0.000008576323,0.000017484554,0.0025078105,0.000004284643,0.0018107364],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816316,0.0001423169,0.00009049863,0.00018025149,0.00088510936,0.0005387128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992653,0.00068110554,0.0020964479,0.0003314771,0.0032847954,0.00095318025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017221663,0.0002846601,0.00047358382,0.0018795271,0.0026297749,0.0009396976,0.0010368861,0.00041414358,0.0031453632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067052827,0.00025937232,0.0007038296,0.006354568,0.00086974975,0.0002792727,0.0009204811,0.00049614825,0.00022261642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019545418,0.000044559172,0.9707444,0.00015178311,0.00015869323,0.00012658005,0.002419714,0.0001666598,0.00010757289,0.0005289371,0.004364416,0.020991145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009915389,0.000012043511,0.996756,0.0000345359,0.000037181733,0.000015348323,0.0010571842,0.000058734215,0.000034162793,0.000031155363,0.0019480098,0.0000057034067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025032597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025032597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033447977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18162501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155543056","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-5890.2007.00059.x","title":"Joint Taxation and the Labour Supply of Married Women: Evidence from the Canadian Tax Reform of 1988*","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fiscal Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Tax reform; Labour economics; Tax credit; Liberian dollar; State income tax; Indirect tax; Value-added tax; Direct tax; Ad valorem tax; Tax rate; Labour supply; Double taxation; Monetary economics; Public economics; Finance","score_opus":0.04063218779412085,"score_gpt":0.28896647848853085,"score_spread":0.24833429069441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155543056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98398054,0.0033218858,0.000044000157,0.0019690788,0.000019089379,0.000025339219,0.0014743668,0.0000018099669,0.009163907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99598986,0.0018311526,0.00003183119,0.00010857096,0.000010089123,0.0000066830635,0.00040130632,0.0000010332828,0.0016195441],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988919,0.000114969094,0.000039769864,0.00008040309,0.0004178022,0.00045515498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956262,0.0007385657,0.0012476704,0.00016973552,0.0014691732,0.00074870227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013982328,0.00013946176,0.00037376073,0.0017884517,0.002889842,0.0010920824,0.00078107987,0.00049495674,0.005473172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076235724,0.00024177137,0.00022940214,0.004128767,0.0013453863,0.00040074054,0.0010863158,0.00057661755,0.0002352632],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004190036,0.00014713389,0.9515648,0.00012161993,0.000092842485,0.00022826652,0.008400095,0.00023492253,0.00021549972,0.0031587912,0.0029193438,0.032497607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021453841,0.00003449349,0.9859174,0.000091352595,0.000034620272,0.000045195564,0.007860902,0.00009282075,0.0000670204,0.00025390825,0.0055706874,0.000010190345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9779995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9892708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022000492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014877271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017803704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1079427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156580463","doi":"10.3138/cpp.39.4.491","title":"Fighting Poverty: Assessing the Effect of Guaranteed Minimum Income Proposals in Quebec","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Subsidy; Economics; Poverty; Wage; Minimum wage; Demographic economics; Sample (material); Labour economics; Econometrics; Accounting; Economic growth","score_opus":0.012657779648727496,"score_gpt":0.2856102362763241,"score_spread":0.2729524566275966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156580463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834198,0.0006460698,0.0005709354,0.0031245097,0.000033824268,0.00022976451,0.0020782442,0.000038451955,0.009858306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956026,0.0002583899,0.00041658725,0.0004249275,0.000010988656,0.00008669698,0.0008134899,0.0000075873268,0.0023786756],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99482024,0.002230731,0.00010668261,0.00025202322,0.00082053797,0.0017697018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98630744,0.005189431,0.0018425133,0.00056236616,0.0038173888,0.0022808022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004583303,0.00058799086,0.0007501377,0.00114591,0.0033803792,0.0020098514,0.0028492904,0.0017212386,0.0044366033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0142371,0.00030972515,0.0009508862,0.0024392887,0.0020927975,0.0009290963,0.0015580514,0.001552201,0.00023919831],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032124873,0.004371478,0.76725805,0.00049714686,0.0012588897,0.00091485697,0.0027265195,0.11642033,0.001622883,0.015646815,0.023492286,0.0625782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005649301,0.0017360105,0.8941252,0.00017387883,0.000322909,0.000054727283,0.0067738523,0.08389699,0.00063879916,0.0011544788,0.01044251,0.000115546056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99648064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.088144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055481896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63953245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156819251","doi":"10.1017/s0008423911000771","title":"The Organizational and Electoral Determinants of the Provincial Funding of Private Education in Canada: A Quantile Regression Analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Quantile regression; Private education; Welfare economics; Order (exchange); Public administration; Economics; Higher education; Finance; Law; Econometrics","score_opus":0.02198551524528621,"score_gpt":0.2828252470603748,"score_spread":0.2608397318150886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156819251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.981076,0.00077384216,0.0016756305,0.0016395024,0.000024289722,0.000053917684,0.007999702,0.000093813855,0.006663259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99281055,0.00025143952,0.0004707388,0.00004092797,0.0000055466,0.000013122049,0.0018946808,0.000018615185,0.004494388],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847156,0.00022061716,0.00005836492,0.00019494274,0.00048330904,0.00057126296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99399805,0.0012068066,0.0009270988,0.00033483983,0.0024499823,0.0010832837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015454929,0.00020880165,0.00045905687,0.0015208096,0.0012748658,0.0016485254,0.0010863945,0.00033700082,0.0060836053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077197393,0.00024270122,0.0006702173,0.0036783745,0.00072088785,0.00033061227,0.00088769535,0.0009046834,0.0004800169],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009773794,0.000023996685,0.97698826,0.000026218302,0.000106394255,0.00008800724,0.000506825,0.0033516872,0.00012601021,0.0031131948,0.0034468141,0.0121247815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008784883,0.000012593213,0.9852732,0.000028197306,0.000046899986,0.00002678136,0.0010152033,0.008874665,0.0001079192,0.0003756906,0.004216089,0.000013978261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99144006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97851306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021486953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027077937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15589947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157035097","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8578.2006.00038.x","title":"Effects of Family Policy Reforms in Norway: Results from a Joint Labour Supply and Childcare Choice Microsimulation Analysis*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fiscal Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thornhill Medical (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Labour supply; Microsimulation; Economics; Labour economics; Work (physics); Population; Parental leave; Demographic economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.016957707322034006,"score_gpt":0.2931989255258062,"score_spread":0.2762412182037722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157035097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99701285,0.0002627297,0.0008556573,0.00011675795,0.000014329562,0.00002534228,0.0008782251,0.000012046992,0.00082211825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978871,0.0001309845,0.00048511388,0.000022792277,0.0000069815337,0.000036662415,0.0008317243,0.000007999804,0.0005906063],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974062,0.0017061157,0.0000856041,0.00017465033,0.00013664515,0.00049076864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895096,0.008426129,0.0009503336,0.0004845818,0.00039847216,0.00023097468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045348224,0.0003957883,0.0011873371,0.00049553026,0.0005660108,0.00077285664,0.0007279231,0.00044014514,0.003553174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007837465,0.00025721997,0.0016384785,0.0010582029,0.0006737101,0.0005027405,0.0008589759,0.00068765454,0.00019257239],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036551727,0.0020102712,0.4423817,0.00032348742,0.0016208466,0.0007349561,0.0014316408,0.50049376,0.00095587235,0.011769853,0.0050471937,0.029575294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043059755,0.001527435,0.6724588,0.000087784894,0.00077277934,0.00007889847,0.004965704,0.30675873,0.001301267,0.00525287,0.006244673,0.00012050468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32673788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21657634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32673788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004091544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025598856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64967215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157268226","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.902895","title":"Learning from a Piece of Pie: The Empirical Content of Nash Bargaining","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining problem; Content (measure theory); Economics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0485532633363369,"score_gpt":0.29112994415582444,"score_spread":0.24257668081948752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157268226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61674595,0.0012717049,0.09336139,0.016854318,0.000254677,0.00017284599,0.00033825112,0.00008963908,0.2709113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917481,0.0002559207,0.002718942,0.00034211876,0.000058363767,0.000052619922,0.00005597634,0.00002529812,0.004742575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99556375,0.0027610522,0.00013656818,0.00047595252,0.00067890465,0.00038380726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9478586,0.04391286,0.002552825,0.0034746027,0.001381979,0.0008190758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01233154,0.0004144425,0.0009983296,0.0009842812,0.0021833624,0.005041614,0.0019787324,0.0029155295,0.026840657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09479699,0.00040779583,0.00051030633,0.0013444166,0.0077974955,0.012568953,0.0023883055,0.0040648025,0.0010510534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002706952,0.00025281883,0.007289016,0.00012567097,0.00005928853,0.000112052425,0.0030491108,0.0094652455,0.000279531,0.94913566,0.0026575876,0.02730338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002134516,0.000025330584,0.0025502963,0.000044502074,0.00001076057,0.00002707308,0.0017853508,0.010349776,0.00013186975,0.98272264,0.002317252,0.000013885971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024325785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002192078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026840657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017220335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014963946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08979094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157895906","doi":"10.1080/03670244.2014.911178","title":"The Role of Women in Food Provision and Food Choice Decision-Making in Singapore: A Case Study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology of Food and Nutrition","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Food choice; Environmental health; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.010092053788097863,"score_gpt":0.27272361856302013,"score_spread":0.2626315647749223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157895906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99499315,0.0002770702,0.000121872356,0.00069987105,0.000010997671,0.000019675746,0.000022807208,0.0000021205956,0.0038524293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954035,0.00089718227,0.0004304621,0.0002606655,0.000010181009,0.00003642355,0.000023046678,0.0000052486366,0.0029331415],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865997,0.0009045655,0.00003645173,0.000070088136,0.00007485624,0.00025410147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988036,0.0006608103,0.00017209422,0.00004431618,0.000063710526,0.00025550474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021606928,0.0005204414,0.0004834747,0.0006926116,0.007078624,0.0020248562,0.00073743175,0.0012174051,0.0032192632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021462855,0.000384784,0.00032536357,0.0009079324,0.0032281762,0.0014196539,0.0024418472,0.001578353,0.00026823414],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013619215,0.0004427594,0.06414408,0.00017143178,0.0000273592,0.023011014,0.890485,0.00012419111,0.0009450319,0.0035629296,0.0011527175,0.015797367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013845277,0.00026503854,0.022472002,0.00013707702,0.000025393529,0.0042439564,0.9581099,0.00035057345,0.0003887597,0.0005389082,0.013431756,0.000022728558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027521383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07409407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027521383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030323698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021691106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05472237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157941010","doi":"","title":"From Policy to Research and Back Again","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economics; Welfare economics","score_opus":0.09773078633901698,"score_gpt":0.379726229570854,"score_spread":0.281995443231837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157941010","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010000174,0.01784473,0.0016803575,0.84458286,0.009720337,0.000034735065,0.00019791529,0.00010790753,0.12483121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15134443,0.06592411,0.0056283716,0.39962992,0.012268283,0.00032383093,0.0006118718,0.00055912085,0.36371002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98598796,0.0070079723,0.00043153457,0.0013929362,0.0032640083,0.0019156373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830225,0.005953463,0.00072208507,0.0033552644,0.0040974366,0.002849203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013397954,0.0007520062,0.0015491977,0.0016586644,0.0047233966,0.02374724,0.0023054783,0.011898003,0.073563375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038513344,0.00060139067,0.00076762843,0.0030648878,0.013114796,0.028624402,0.009933262,0.014222179,0.030268285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003937208,0.000064372434,0.00023554725,0.0002772433,0.00001610298,0.00009878732,0.0014114181,0.00012861192,0.00017478147,0.70460224,0.24907225,0.043879338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014814245,0.000025598943,0.00013134016,0.000811681,0.000005827392,0.000042108346,0.0024153455,0.00007221818,0.00015628984,0.22124913,0.7750631,0.000012425333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007553884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042934865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073563375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00996164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028062696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24609399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158993225","doi":"","title":"Sterilisation and the work careers of women","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Work (physics); Work hours; Demographic economics; Psychology; Maternity leave; Demography; Medicine; Working hours; Labour economics; Economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03181957056400616,"score_gpt":0.3102223683307914,"score_spread":0.2784027977667853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158993225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929929,0.0008740732,0.000042749318,0.0004059379,0.000009947058,0.000009536862,0.0012944504,0.0000029403418,0.0043675033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99588794,0.0006544949,0.00005927342,0.00004874257,0.0000071907707,0.000005156327,0.0007930499,0.0000016223523,0.002542441],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994906,0.00007032313,0.000015620633,0.000031488475,0.00011755151,0.00027437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972907,0.0004929106,0.000968828,0.00007486433,0.00028938495,0.0008833739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006186426,0.00010640441,0.00015194404,0.0016413017,0.0013058175,0.0009862267,0.00035600853,0.0002982074,0.0050780177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003645618,0.000128961,0.0002707627,0.0017672123,0.0004936772,0.00027792124,0.00072245934,0.0004657959,0.0004112516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007240031,0.00005002355,0.9880372,0.000017798655,0.000016734408,0.00010763537,0.0023024958,0.00010483182,0.000108598084,0.00036929085,0.00063347875,0.00817943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003109446,0.000026489011,0.9932335,0.000021882435,0.00000508686,0.00008095794,0.0032233743,0.00007346286,0.000039555554,0.00007290807,0.0032145518,0.0000051915645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48455575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68221486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48455575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025557652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033373465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96347064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159164094","doi":"","title":"Female activity choice in a dual context: an integrated model for formal and informal sectors in cameroon","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Earnings; Economics; Informal sector; Sample (material); Estimation; Consistency (knowledge bases); Work (physics); Developing country; Labour economics; Labour supply; Function (biology); Dual (grammatical number); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Accounting; Computer science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.05819473459855485,"score_gpt":0.3496767513677718,"score_spread":0.291482016769217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159164094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95090455,0.0012298132,0.026248189,0.0038424998,0.00009743042,0.00013071456,0.0009514736,0.000052038416,0.016543139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866937,0.00047394814,0.0015571507,0.00009700557,0.000032303087,0.00008554249,0.00014554818,0.000012330946,0.010902486],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992322,0.00035176554,0.000014322614,0.00009564829,0.000016216776,0.00028996824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850804,0.0007525662,0.00018763491,0.00005039848,0.00011475319,0.0003866429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018079369,0.0010337274,0.0015669328,0.00077887013,0.0012539661,0.003202529,0.0016270981,0.0022346207,0.018262325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002423889,0.0005714121,0.0013827704,0.0009691488,0.0017472276,0.0016774334,0.0019014502,0.0016731006,0.0010265416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019309149,0.00076976063,0.085254684,0.0002787602,0.00036191795,0.0031436286,0.0033867208,0.5919237,0.001913375,0.28698894,0.0065198997,0.017527722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037543086,0.00032128813,0.01923916,0.00008979107,0.00024232148,0.00028625163,0.0030064872,0.9252729,0.00013983145,0.04755015,0.0033966424,0.00007969642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072131924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049273107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072131924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029364172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016736607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14342415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159891818","doi":"10.7202/601447ar","title":"Revenu, caractéristiques sociodémographiques et dépenses des ménages au Canada en 1978 et 1982","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.036819261228438635,"score_gpt":0.298472572904055,"score_spread":0.26165331167561634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159891818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730603,0.0057254964,0.00014885639,0.0016257351,0.000046247354,0.000032482094,0.004915985,0.000011819327,0.014433038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96185523,0.007134657,0.00031256257,0.00030263906,0.000034626977,0.000031794323,0.0024924495,0.000008920813,0.027827071],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955136,0.000022309127,0.000015263364,0.000036641104,0.00014968822,0.00022473157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988913,0.0001832538,0.0002312947,0.000025306674,0.00050671864,0.00016222049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037754775,0.00018658229,0.00022236357,0.0023821546,0.0033405977,0.0009844159,0.0003654949,0.00024096039,0.0042187036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013522665,0.00015448352,0.0002116826,0.0045790058,0.00076148653,0.00028252226,0.00050235854,0.00044828953,0.00023702116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016014381,0.000040472474,0.8940232,0.00019798067,0.00006225676,0.0007047685,0.02884811,0.00035213467,0.0006245934,0.0040193684,0.010888377,0.060078636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026984476,0.000014444087,0.9677981,0.000051342973,0.000010556883,0.00009130643,0.008629559,0.000042392283,0.00017660453,0.000051701852,0.023119723,0.000011557143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99851865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020564051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020564051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027701406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1492033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160280749","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x10000073","title":"Global Householding amid Global Crises","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Pooling; Sociocultural evolution; Politics; Order (exchange); Population; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Unit (ring theory); Reproduction; Sociology; Political economy; Economy; Geography; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.05282907680598626,"score_gpt":0.33829756087689744,"score_spread":0.2854684840709112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160280749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21617235,0.018930288,0.0063375668,0.07402861,0.0014723251,0.00005133837,0.00037556648,0.000156169,0.6824758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641756,0.0055001304,0.0009134294,0.0047513237,0.00056931964,0.000038149643,0.00010158192,0.00006970081,0.023880782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991748,0.0003049184,0.000019216395,0.00013817279,0.000080235564,0.0002826046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994473,0.0001518207,0.0000764402,0.00011630399,0.0000687423,0.00013934707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013634365,0.00031596873,0.00035807787,0.0006238504,0.0032295529,0.003667615,0.00034206655,0.0014169761,0.010700636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016949219,0.000112074864,0.00019206225,0.0012574219,0.00874045,0.00740626,0.0055308985,0.0018373075,0.00061329856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046967078,0.000009886137,0.0023523944,0.000079467085,0.000009020963,0.00055726746,0.039598536,0.00026363245,0.00039437233,0.9005575,0.022438917,0.03369201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066166554,0.000030601142,0.008872169,0.00016230746,0.000007653118,0.00040821568,0.04467403,0.00022248235,0.00023816527,0.24016601,0.70519537,0.000016391486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026052387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035366712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010700636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025740282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009203903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03579724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161568344","doi":"10.1016/j.labeco.2011.01.007","title":"Curbing Cream-Skimming: Evidence on Enrolment Incentives","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Context (archaeology); Shadow (psychology); Government (linguistics); Margin (machine learning); Business; Demographic economics; Shadow price; Public sector; Population; Public economics; Labour economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Environmental health; Medicine; Psychology; Geography; Economy","score_opus":0.03331720020638623,"score_gpt":0.29105741367332794,"score_spread":0.2577402134669417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161568344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9091701,0.0040292167,0.0025498702,0.00982593,0.00028134018,0.00027783425,0.00084452744,0.0001102526,0.07291086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908627,0.0007963596,0.0003115095,0.0008642263,0.00017281558,0.00007289577,0.00010698891,0.000010754926,0.006801765],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945576,0.002916765,0.00023182224,0.00034765695,0.00068720535,0.001259022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9475987,0.037376918,0.008522314,0.0017639203,0.0008888275,0.0038493075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00888747,0.00047876273,0.00097387814,0.00091574853,0.0008041196,0.0017533462,0.001096505,0.0030521485,0.034579575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044540763,0.00034229673,0.00070446276,0.00076267467,0.0014430616,0.001508249,0.002431594,0.0016464203,0.0024866362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015496471,0.010583706,0.39259568,0.0022496004,0.0007569444,0.0006077244,0.0028280455,0.0031073838,0.008270319,0.06956464,0.01823506,0.47570443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031691513,0.0037460183,0.86760134,0.0015752392,0.0008446787,0.00030504572,0.0031767886,0.0047628414,0.0065781916,0.06153774,0.046619236,0.00008378923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023416458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003277092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034579575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008807729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018080074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11568022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161595035","doi":"10.7202/1003586ar","title":"L’action publique et la première naissance au Canada","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02306860561011166,"score_gpt":0.2509390334816753,"score_spread":0.22787042787156364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161595035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8524843,0.015843295,0.0017946616,0.032224756,0.00036329892,0.00018494365,0.0054277754,0.00009772893,0.09157928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96811837,0.0055160923,0.0006634937,0.0013653702,0.000059911974,0.00006224633,0.0006217455,0.000032613236,0.02356021],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937296,0.0011642714,0.00021755777,0.0006105179,0.002179803,0.0020982341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799178,0.0037379113,0.0032335434,0.00065541855,0.0073809167,0.005074431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044567604,0.00027954494,0.0006484406,0.0018955105,0.007234517,0.0048739556,0.0013021654,0.0009267689,0.009880387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01398239,0.0004025691,0.0004898146,0.0043342486,0.0029805652,0.0013089647,0.0021260262,0.0025221235,0.00050105224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004965983,0.00025645393,0.6869557,0.00090160844,0.00046105654,0.0008431244,0.05515594,0.0015114925,0.0010424093,0.060810756,0.024608275,0.16695657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005879264,0.00011453868,0.8200988,0.0011704982,0.00018404628,0.00015617034,0.03603859,0.0009228838,0.0006418017,0.0028464233,0.13764092,0.00012648218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9885307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99173707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05619474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05619474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15285845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40772325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161767329","doi":"10.1093/esr/jcm021","title":"Economic Inequality In and Outside of Marriage: Individual Resources and Institutional Context","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Sociological Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inequality; Context (archaeology); Economic inequality; Economics; Social inequality; Demographic economics; Income inequality metrics; Ideology; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.08318094108687775,"score_gpt":0.34202431981307324,"score_spread":0.2588433787261955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161767329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99314415,0.0009263792,0.00017915796,0.00014331023,0.0000037686773,0.0000043515643,0.00013314218,0.0000012852605,0.005464392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993711,0.00033103125,0.000038550388,0.000011549333,0.0000032781986,0.0000035825042,0.00006518578,7.682491e-7,0.00017490247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989625,0.00053823955,0.00004469886,0.000120551995,0.00011436198,0.00021970812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770796,0.0009708556,0.0008104916,0.00013087234,0.0001124555,0.00026723737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00099146,0.0000869793,0.00045145198,0.001179897,0.00092846755,0.001286325,0.00031830894,0.00022361777,0.004899902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044953017,0.00009822689,0.00011876249,0.0024369864,0.0011110218,0.0008894039,0.0019303664,0.00031843278,0.00018069406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007556718,0.00011319716,0.94029653,0.00008830942,0.00011429374,0.0004212145,0.0120226,0.0002945807,0.0002842817,0.008579698,0.0005545675,0.037155297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002232607,0.00003518413,0.9781643,0.00005819556,0.000021639094,0.00021193083,0.016956141,0.00016135785,0.00007224247,0.0018108105,0.0024983168,0.0000076103065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009119077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017444275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009119077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056478503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004894685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018131971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162033867","doi":"10.7202/602252ar","title":"L’effet des politiques de financement des services de garde sur le choix des modes de garde des familles québécoises","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05424711382940153,"score_gpt":0.28185398340962947,"score_spread":0.22760686958022794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162033867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858796,0.00089809654,0.00065537175,0.0030219941,0.000020083751,0.000046544246,0.0013382442,0.000017811011,0.00812225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98831356,0.0004572914,0.0003164932,0.00015065094,0.0000074821573,0.000046922163,0.0004890129,0.0000042499996,0.01021427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988456,0.00039784616,0.000028580605,0.00010444874,0.00017705861,0.0004464747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99390006,0.0025994447,0.0010616416,0.00020093725,0.00097278773,0.0012652309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014974067,0.00032224995,0.00047715858,0.00075057754,0.000947402,0.0013011966,0.00068394875,0.00067840057,0.01247803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007835289,0.00023431894,0.00050875795,0.0012961149,0.0008317347,0.00058273895,0.0007963641,0.001082009,0.00041624406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089842547,0.00022649259,0.9231738,0.00017228954,0.00055686256,0.00041415615,0.002826354,0.0133423135,0.0011203821,0.010786752,0.0056003216,0.040881917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006519718,0.0002404036,0.9799044,0.00012415323,0.00017329202,0.00006343018,0.0041139647,0.0062945876,0.0004254872,0.00086507096,0.007708077,0.000021964936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.895057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91034955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10494298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0119792465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007841564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21112198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162197847","doi":"10.1353/dem.2005.0017","title":"Changes in children’s time with parents: A correction","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Demography; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.007880955319622993,"score_gpt":0.22623163521468423,"score_spread":0.21835067989506124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162197847","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018720621,0.0026560163,0.00089201913,0.6465114,0.33821547,0.00006362125,0.0028620774,0.00036444535,0.006562873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04922509,0.007160524,0.007672643,0.6537801,0.17684045,0.0005305523,0.0029817782,0.0003837527,0.10142506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953803,0.00088351493,0.0010927733,0.00050989346,0.0017481439,0.00038542313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9675871,0.01113485,0.0024507793,0.0021901033,0.015698576,0.00093852513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003542435,0.0011816398,0.000995074,0.0016125744,0.0018837228,0.0015833284,0.0026342173,0.01084895,0.007861916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05459119,0.0006509037,0.0010513263,0.0018574966,0.0016584347,0.0014545668,0.0011008752,0.013254577,0.0064736945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002178692,0.000010660864,0.00052100705,0.00006768569,0.000006286312,0.00037277825,0.00007798059,0.00003524212,0.0000614088,0.00066757493,0.99038273,0.007774847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049527946,0.000050641287,0.010332069,0.00048329536,0.00002897106,0.0012986158,0.00028406768,0.00053229916,0.00042044226,0.0010071977,0.98546773,0.00004511881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056520816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06173248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056520816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007097719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004630195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11238366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162376962","doi":"10.7202/013471ar","title":"La production domestique dans les modèles collectifs","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03412138074003479,"score_gpt":0.2628999199284128,"score_spread":0.22877853918837798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162376962","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40957725,0.0041321153,0.5354765,0.0038475716,0.0002886565,0.0003818771,0.0038906466,0.0004432328,0.04196211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9110028,0.0030087826,0.03657843,0.00024103936,0.0001196488,0.0005867994,0.0013315737,0.00018105324,0.04694988],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987214,0.00058197114,0.000059407717,0.00026959766,0.00018646134,0.00018109185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950814,0.0033855047,0.00053905684,0.00038402656,0.0004145053,0.00019553403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042635314,0.001325403,0.0012511178,0.0009659317,0.000904097,0.0030841904,0.0020940835,0.0014052044,0.011162804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009967286,0.0007011065,0.0025395502,0.001659624,0.001529889,0.0027769106,0.0016940485,0.0019738756,0.0017042025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019644946,0.00013423084,0.031169426,0.00032950589,0.00040219902,0.0004404556,0.002207159,0.7944934,0.0009522909,0.14725785,0.0024497006,0.019967435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078665646,0.00022666695,0.020258063,0.00020250278,0.00029848493,0.00029596797,0.0012252337,0.8603818,0.0009331426,0.08926618,0.026704172,0.00012910833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070451476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045970123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070451476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030701025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034829725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14008278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162537598","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511511493.002","title":"The State of Poverty: TANF Recipients","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; State (computer science); Economics; Computer science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.019119662060550033,"score_gpt":0.21527860557392892,"score_spread":0.19615894351337887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162537598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019113734,0.019313445,0.00086003484,0.115653366,0.013952603,0.0001834367,0.00029600906,0.00021212692,0.8304153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06395065,0.0137342755,0.0006273732,0.016335206,0.0023678998,0.000224107,0.00021679373,0.000095151234,0.9024485],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993211,0.00017560468,0.000018378825,0.00003059288,0.00018927263,0.00026506162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994128,0.00012354404,0.0000415099,0.000026634623,0.00019271643,0.00020280774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002312413,0.00037834654,0.00027917794,0.0012967612,0.00438802,0.0032202106,0.00065170595,0.0022060848,0.058110792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034608012,0.00021380231,0.00023853306,0.0008751049,0.000846746,0.0040166327,0.0031674886,0.0022629155,0.007941232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012575296,0.00010420013,0.0014681359,0.00007439451,0.0000018741146,0.00034389293,0.0061660903,0.000035781923,0.00006381386,0.07966819,0.7477778,0.16428319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040289337,0.000025218807,0.001317735,0.00016090127,0.000001806088,0.00027072933,0.0036734538,0.000034364206,0.000038829796,0.0037706802,0.9906945,0.000007704714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053820913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012405492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058110792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017050698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033824937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19439995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162610442","doi":"","title":"Home Cooking, Food Consumption and Food Production among the Unemployed and Retired Households","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population Research Papers","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Calorie; Unemployment; Food consumption; Food processing; Production (economics); Economics; Consumer Expenditure Survey; Agricultural economics; Business; Food science; Economic growth; Medicine; Aggregate expenditure; Public economics; Biology","score_opus":0.06261858870734073,"score_gpt":0.3237504927530603,"score_spread":0.26113190404571957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162610442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989831,0.00013460757,0.0000093621065,0.000016102835,9.4274344e-7,0.0000020291939,0.00044843458,6.609539e-7,0.0004047905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860483,0.00015277797,0.00003486209,0.000011538629,0.0000014548093,0.000002203211,0.00046588053,7.934547e-7,0.000725786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999075,0.000007008303,0.0000043988284,0.000013371199,0.000020554475,0.00004716656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998029,0.000020039502,0.000067876215,0.0000103289185,0.000035965066,0.00006290025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025592808,0.00012773956,0.00014609768,0.0007351422,0.0006580672,0.0003933166,0.00025358563,0.00016661719,0.0019653563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080572575,0.000113801376,0.00022730156,0.0009310419,0.0002472647,0.0001876435,0.0002860337,0.00017510963,0.0001671807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012780899,0.000024386889,0.9937795,0.000009326922,0.000020228397,0.000055169905,0.00080431974,0.00007485746,0.00020052717,0.00008714827,0.00025239808,0.004564347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011871475,0.000011950632,0.9992812,0.0000029841613,0.000005016984,0.00001249899,0.00042030297,0.00004312232,0.000016955299,0.000010278841,0.0001930952,0.0000015004847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74458444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.873369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74458444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016083117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011601002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5138395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162796931","doi":"10.15171/ijhpm.2014.127","title":"Localization of determinants of fertility through measurement adaptations in developing-country settings: The case of Iran Comment on “Analysis of economic determinants of fertility in Iran: a multilevel approach”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Developing country; Inequality; Work (physics); Economics; Demographic economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Population; Demography; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.10234910548972329,"score_gpt":0.39654667708085956,"score_spread":0.29419757159113624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162796931","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011425096,0.0016890028,0.0011357091,0.9822233,0.0019580792,0.000018813002,0.00010423472,0.000014131088,0.0014317107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32586354,0.0043964745,0.0042001973,0.65487987,0.007622828,0.00020734099,0.00015485112,0.00006219809,0.0026125985],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887051,0.0065622292,0.00071283936,0.0009996503,0.002106862,0.00091333146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94347703,0.040822126,0.0050641117,0.0015693858,0.008181566,0.0008857086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027466819,0.00038681898,0.00048659553,0.0010378808,0.003942732,0.0021230003,0.0046738256,0.008468206,0.0010940795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06905239,0.00031156014,0.001173432,0.0023224598,0.010054894,0.0038255954,0.002609764,0.010105973,0.00029168607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009256667,0.00006145464,0.06147779,0.0008918607,0.00011851545,0.0034036865,0.09734606,0.00083180284,0.00058456865,0.08337451,0.7031673,0.048649892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005713655,0.0001826468,0.10083345,0.002862169,0.00020158096,0.0024866832,0.1623677,0.0021887927,0.0020490307,0.047627624,0.67873675,0.0004063737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13820708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16460998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13820708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005125465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011755159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27480525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162943275","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdq003","title":"Consumption Inequality and Intra-household Allocations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Australian National University; Yale University","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Consumption (sociology); Inequality; Economics; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2062888121133496,"score_gpt":0.36607013279565354,"score_spread":0.15978132068230394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162943275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8912634,0.0056142476,0.027155925,0.0011251939,0.000049381262,0.0000684925,0.00204413,0.00003414579,0.07264498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954405,0.00079957163,0.001336853,0.0000584536,0.000013019484,0.000035866484,0.0004207297,0.000006006462,0.0018889904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864537,0.00069644535,0.00007439582,0.00022929454,0.0001845203,0.00016994964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979729,0.0008522094,0.0005513276,0.0002986596,0.00027510745,0.000049917362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013604985,0.00020132103,0.00035489872,0.0015235265,0.00041003624,0.001018204,0.00036820877,0.00029596107,0.004757579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006997858,0.00012942494,0.0002803018,0.004073226,0.0008939476,0.0012039549,0.0012159038,0.00040868914,0.0004175896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024166793,0.00011260478,0.67704296,0.00031216256,0.0004458216,0.00027113938,0.0044686347,0.0127978595,0.0007060696,0.16949745,0.0030174472,0.13108622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010922896,0.000064195716,0.88161194,0.00023677341,0.00007278033,0.00018680442,0.002926854,0.008297812,0.00045548746,0.08376128,0.022354033,0.000021251848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010349488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00881747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010349488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094534253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033214988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020578504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163462983","doi":"10.1257/000282802320191633","title":"All in the Family: A Simultaneous Model of Parenting Style and Child Conduct","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Parenting styles; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Developmental psychology; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.0724653101185468,"score_gpt":0.31407820395409736,"score_spread":0.24161289383555057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163462983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5825171,0.012004418,0.16082263,0.029190809,0.00066212786,0.00037300095,0.0017357697,0.00022003247,0.2124742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97611654,0.0056687705,0.008945388,0.00040977256,0.00023246932,0.00020064547,0.000306401,0.000042904107,0.008077081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828005,0.0010632002,0.000046486213,0.00018195577,0.0001868076,0.00024144059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722195,0.0014838977,0.00039088857,0.00016775665,0.0002458361,0.00048972684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015518218,0.0012455756,0.0009405064,0.0013815857,0.0015791338,0.003205721,0.0017384563,0.0012432004,0.008533976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00399888,0.00075740693,0.002211338,0.0019768302,0.0029783032,0.0045057205,0.003100967,0.0021807286,0.00080227584],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004091512,0.0008464616,0.13944069,0.00023699827,0.0008938895,0.0023895036,0.017192518,0.033265002,0.00066872465,0.7548808,0.0074248416,0.04235151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021786234,0.0006099007,0.11455845,0.0004403604,0.001227,0.00325535,0.01053845,0.10652297,0.00019196126,0.7423529,0.019942269,0.00014242227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015212668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012099041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015212668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017007841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029673849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030248225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163470642","doi":"10.7202/602225ar","title":"L’impact des règles de prêts hypothécaires sur l’offre de travail des femmes au Canada : évidence paramétrique et non paramétrique","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.058055066045855815,"score_gpt":0.2985030460448982,"score_spread":0.24044797999904238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163470642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9456368,0.004425892,0.027107464,0.0023967335,0.00008330582,0.0003144118,0.004529636,0.00021291885,0.015292938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852852,0.0011430733,0.004687503,0.00021483446,0.000024429413,0.00012625878,0.0020060488,0.000046068268,0.006466595],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98846686,0.005240046,0.00073030207,0.0019348153,0.0023677386,0.0012601422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89796734,0.07979143,0.009012471,0.0076714307,0.004615001,0.00094236014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016914183,0.0009785859,0.0017498502,0.0013906009,0.0024725806,0.003413332,0.0025622086,0.0010661925,0.01396404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057561427,0.00078863255,0.0033410566,0.0031900376,0.0029978743,0.0015607122,0.002040601,0.0027456942,0.0006913933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018941201,0.00018537222,0.86908174,0.00056673505,0.0036481495,0.0006902018,0.005927967,0.027757432,0.00094246643,0.020576483,0.0032467432,0.06548274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024213665,0.00079950184,0.9129324,0.0005523083,0.0029410473,0.0003791037,0.0121101355,0.034203846,0.0028316972,0.010643548,0.022128345,0.00023591302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8883263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.849558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11167371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010568943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017295549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22466272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163787203","doi":"10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.10.004","title":"What determines female autonomy? Evidence from Bangladesh","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Development Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":568,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Unearned income; Economics; Developing country; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Point (geometry); Public economics; Economic growth; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05551329499319924,"score_gpt":0.27514370546396116,"score_spread":0.21963041047076193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163787203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9692786,0.001364468,0.00013016498,0.0028328344,0.000009639975,0.000013766602,0.00064788584,0.0000012980239,0.025721377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982343,0.0007538484,0.000032730444,0.000116155534,0.0000051868533,0.000004982957,0.000091438145,0.0000012986875,0.000760008],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993069,0.0003181222,0.00004127223,0.0000799318,0.0000854591,0.00016844488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911577,0.0063697053,0.001129278,0.00029070434,0.00062725577,0.00042523647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015811318,0.00019902839,0.00032217716,0.0006994658,0.0009248719,0.0008131035,0.00037477972,0.00052436587,0.009033016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073353266,0.00017054772,0.00014785778,0.0019306898,0.0018248439,0.00076220743,0.000760414,0.00070253416,0.00075581425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010712392,0.00016732296,0.923818,0.00033899045,0.00011726855,0.0016489744,0.020510642,0.0003291586,0.0012728003,0.010535892,0.0023588862,0.037830792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008151506,0.00023633867,0.9311108,0.00029842916,0.0001267631,0.0005321813,0.044746812,0.00019408751,0.00073670154,0.0051439526,0.016760776,0.000031643813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05957528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08736979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05957528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011594688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011435454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11845702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164153711","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.678922","title":"Assessing the External Validity of an Experimental Wage Subsidy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn; Sugar Research and Development Corporation","keywords":"Earnings; Subsidy; Harm; Welfare; External validity; Wage; Demographic economics; Sample (material); Economics; Econometrics; Psychology; Labour economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0314099715571445,"score_gpt":0.34429118142412884,"score_spread":0.31288120986698437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164153711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9739938,0.000118346434,0.0048905136,0.00050079887,0.00039917743,0.0014890204,0.00031443237,0.000052040134,0.018241951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99126726,0.000074415424,0.0027500673,0.0003378619,0.00015335834,0.0026606466,0.00035397153,0.00006034564,0.0023420637],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9555427,0.030046541,0.0028224913,0.004612636,0.006230382,0.0007452301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47108248,0.42416814,0.03146089,0.050922204,0.019786088,0.0025801694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05011104,0.00070140697,0.0010731851,0.0010098366,0.0017041975,0.0017672847,0.0017147763,0.0024881575,0.0064761145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26874542,0.0006092036,0.0011090359,0.0008954565,0.0051684002,0.001709705,0.0030738877,0.002209651,0.0011006529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08660327,0.06523058,0.604443,0.0010388556,0.0024125855,0.0003877774,0.012989405,0.009423413,0.014642468,0.04608335,0.005640516,0.15110472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019681918,0.050592717,0.8385129,0.00040024042,0.0014583665,0.00037048146,0.003272952,0.021751078,0.013515235,0.026903404,0.023244906,0.00029575694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016429346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008875491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05011104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002148021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017829576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26501566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164723744","doi":"10.25336/p6np5p","title":"Earning and caring: demographic change and policy implications","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Unpaid work; Private sphere; Division of labour; Work (physics); Fertility; Demographic economics; Paid work; Sociology; Public sphere; Interpersonal communication; Women's work; Social psychology; Labour economics; Psychology; Economics; Population; Political science; Demography; Working hours","score_opus":0.12992177835419227,"score_gpt":0.34403714160164156,"score_spread":0.2141153632474493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164723744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.707796,0.024329329,0.0005220614,0.20696686,0.00051624136,0.00006532072,0.0024007706,0.000025807502,0.057377607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97390884,0.015758999,0.00033272037,0.004698837,0.00016188533,0.000025265737,0.00040690653,0.0000044379026,0.0047021634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990011,0.00019573855,0.00002803634,0.000052040257,0.00017004213,0.0005530772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841154,0.00022871917,0.00020557152,0.000025905847,0.00037734563,0.0007509647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014033908,0.00011650267,0.000245835,0.0014110074,0.003174472,0.0013310361,0.00069331896,0.0006985036,0.006975029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028992044,0.00007071975,0.00023692535,0.002374504,0.0016143556,0.0011896845,0.0011982128,0.00095343776,0.00018009788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030211828,0.000259972,0.4959709,0.0007951699,0.000042886033,0.0012038479,0.03330767,0.00094460824,0.0012442815,0.12372044,0.036352124,0.30585593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013632721,0.000115268835,0.8108537,0.0004880694,0.000025377189,0.0005027193,0.07852286,0.00034999038,0.00019825951,0.0076206466,0.101269044,0.000040344177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8142192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89746106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18578082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01232047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020015027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3737498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164987490","doi":"10.1017/s0008423908081134","title":"Gender and Elections: An Examination of the 2006 Canadian Federal Election","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Welfare economics; Flexibility (engineering); Demographic economics; Economics; Art; Management","score_opus":0.028132954178566167,"score_gpt":0.2743138883596084,"score_spread":0.24618093418104223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164987490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94969076,0.002064017,0.0002314763,0.002470086,0.00015432517,0.000115658426,0.009543319,0.00003896251,0.03569148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827291,0.0008123016,0.00026427588,0.00019809722,0.000032972337,0.000035069363,0.003087791,0.000020281652,0.012820263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976814,0.00019267653,0.0000516938,0.00017663765,0.0010816236,0.00081596087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569064,0.0004958475,0.00056916557,0.00013570322,0.0024073224,0.00070143584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002527345,0.0003626974,0.0007569181,0.0034540074,0.0053322483,0.0019905667,0.0011028101,0.0005750708,0.0056646173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008324505,0.00024475987,0.0007546375,0.008023283,0.0007099991,0.00046497298,0.0008717963,0.0008928172,0.000499382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000744565,0.00014253527,0.8823654,0.00026236306,0.00015471996,0.0004410979,0.008100692,0.0020611554,0.00058324257,0.010241642,0.03409773,0.060804874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000089432,0.000024690942,0.97118706,0.00002327785,0.000020574824,0.000031422835,0.0039578085,0.0006178708,0.00008954675,0.00009754334,0.023919122,0.000022264412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062529504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062529504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053745043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165371533","doi":"10.2202/2152-2812.1013","title":"An Assessment of Important Issues Concerning the Application of Benefit-Cost Analysis to Social Policy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Public economics; Valuation (finance); Public policy; Cost–benefit analysis; Shadow price; Shadow (psychology); Futures contract; Policy analysis; Public good; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Social Welfare; Microeconomics; Political science; Economic growth; Psychology; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.020642149177077563,"score_gpt":0.38167601618747543,"score_spread":0.36103386701039786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165371533","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060987707,0.026600856,0.39940313,0.20271032,0.0025199081,0.0016308976,0.00076666,0.0002931661,0.3050874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85550463,0.008992515,0.114481114,0.008284586,0.0025669122,0.0015105924,0.0001269301,0.00017483375,0.0083578555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9294632,0.057801597,0.0014530972,0.0013721602,0.0085373055,0.0013725547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7246472,0.25131035,0.0037840805,0.0051813438,0.013770829,0.0013061548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07803369,0.0022367118,0.003043882,0.0056860065,0.003437467,0.013345005,0.0044902386,0.008604529,0.01191656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22114298,0.0010689761,0.0028263626,0.0054464126,0.01029107,0.011377209,0.006000793,0.010205335,0.0009502129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110627116,0.00012080813,0.0011185714,0.00048784068,0.00012950924,0.00016080038,0.0004036161,0.064258635,0.00013838758,0.877527,0.00863544,0.046908755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032519827,0.00008907574,0.0008020785,0.00077069254,0.000072088485,0.00006927441,0.00062369066,0.08032022,0.00018275584,0.90234804,0.014624974,0.00006462358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009994774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067530097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07803369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0117704915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009918932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41268653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165583393","doi":"10.1093/aepp/ppt023","title":"While Mothers Work Do Children Shirk? Determinants of Youth Obesity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; McMaster University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Endogeneity; National Longitudinal Surveys; Instrumental variable; Allowance (engineering); Obesity; Psychology; Longitudinal study; Developmental psychology; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Economics; Medicine; Econometrics","score_opus":0.01235463840138428,"score_gpt":0.25211374102541034,"score_spread":0.23975910262402605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165583393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957677,0.0005222345,0.000051041527,0.0010422957,0.000014463668,0.0000026560485,0.00034714822,0.0000018679635,0.002250614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989729,0.0003408864,0.000026563404,0.00004137309,0.0000062710055,0.0000016459142,0.000116222196,0.000001316725,0.0004927509],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999655,0.00007375999,0.0000100821935,0.000040024588,0.00006078225,0.00016030384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985989,0.00029792782,0.00058333966,0.000042638047,0.00012895324,0.0003483365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006377894,0.00008774247,0.00017877464,0.00041957028,0.0006513582,0.0009152209,0.00037225566,0.00025342155,0.0038032872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002301266,0.000118786615,0.00017488717,0.0007749541,0.00045508397,0.00026665424,0.0004316838,0.00051304314,0.00021560564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015547212,0.000016706037,0.9937239,0.000008793796,0.000011914356,0.00006724282,0.0009304884,0.000045155113,0.000053265223,0.00043763436,0.000433562,0.004255823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013924857,0.000009048087,0.99410266,0.000036445017,0.000009032379,0.000030852796,0.004484672,0.00007824589,0.000033681677,0.00009823184,0.0011140073,0.0000017997847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32927102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52280504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32927102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014128765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020401739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65470886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166117347","doi":"10.2511/rpsd.32.3.184","title":"Utilizing Natural Supports to Lower the Cost of Supported Employment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Per capita; Fiscal year; Natural experiment; Economics; Natural (archaeology); State (computer science); Business; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Geography; Finance; Demography; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.0907744983153648,"score_gpt":0.41798667962602226,"score_spread":0.32721218131065744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166117347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921346,0.00044010312,0.00032159625,0.0010918345,0.000025845213,0.000048711976,0.00011588589,0.000009186245,0.005812279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998052,0.00031845592,0.0005971966,0.00012727788,0.000016956581,0.000046694484,0.0000450368,0.0000013244248,0.0007949499],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988673,0.00057296007,0.000054098262,0.000040861847,0.00019124249,0.00027358087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809474,0.0005912026,0.0006235192,0.000085833446,0.0002112265,0.00039351816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073491,0.00020685297,0.00013308597,0.00047364976,0.00065013766,0.00080730347,0.00044359273,0.00038286013,0.0054141846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004711433,0.000076671226,0.00034206102,0.00037948115,0.00027400235,0.0004641644,0.00087277073,0.0003967085,0.00018144975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011177091,0.006489157,0.43582216,0.0005625959,0.0005354594,0.000533298,0.0027455853,0.0032587533,0.0032302039,0.005343795,0.005230268,0.535131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018746717,0.0037410608,0.9562734,0.00055429095,0.00035152512,0.0005375839,0.006460781,0.0026269252,0.0016777132,0.0018036274,0.025735304,0.000050365103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013581906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061372835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013581906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013985403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027649004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027005672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167946863","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1464719","title":"Share the Gain, Share the Pain? Almost Transferable Utility, Changes in Production Possibilities, and Bargaining Solutions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; HEC Montréal; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Transferable utility; Economics; Microeconomics; Business; Game theory","score_opus":0.02904525935664445,"score_gpt":0.2699468898077473,"score_spread":0.24090163045110283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167946863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41323364,0.0018297746,0.14050443,0.046346128,0.00030627238,0.00014191573,0.00021047263,0.00011612034,0.39731127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99093974,0.0001490243,0.002724598,0.00028516244,0.00005070867,0.000041255593,0.000012288937,0.000015002269,0.005782167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761826,0.0011173331,0.000068884925,0.0003886982,0.00030563874,0.0005011913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969618,0.0015601447,0.0003250619,0.0006861142,0.00020827862,0.00025867776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047328435,0.0005116038,0.0007993981,0.0006493333,0.0025955932,0.0059725656,0.00176964,0.0038329696,0.02078121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010971192,0.00039959195,0.0007804489,0.0007807297,0.013376182,0.013196133,0.004363095,0.0038274897,0.0008289006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006365508,0.000042554653,0.00032459619,0.000018499702,0.000014923109,0.000051893596,0.0005060565,0.0020935768,0.0001776169,0.9876946,0.00057540543,0.008436545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011421499,0.000007811265,0.000120388955,0.000005829938,0.0000025636966,0.000011547495,0.0003320323,0.001039052,0.000045132598,0.9977628,0.00065823295,0.000003175001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013117827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014089509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02078121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028247894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015352973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069520116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168057108","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.273572","title":"The Control of Land Rent in the Fortified Farming Town","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Landlord; Administration (probate law); Agriculture; Control (management); Business; Economics; Agricultural economics; Natural resource economics; Geography","score_opus":0.037427667288459435,"score_gpt":0.2727580173698468,"score_spread":0.23533035008138736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168057108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677104,0.00012964543,0.0015806943,0.00078654214,0.000008757775,0.00000937146,0.000024497243,0.0000054511797,0.029744716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785185,0.00002258036,0.00010638763,0.000009467361,0.0000021701605,0.0000016324976,0.0000018168371,0.0000011475577,0.0020028867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998299,0.000058800782,0.0000028092172,0.000029218887,0.000016455402,0.00006273097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970716,0.00008630293,0.000060766117,0.000025198447,0.000022445267,0.000098179764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025195457,0.00011632217,0.00021922644,0.00025631246,0.0013383719,0.00201662,0.00037931403,0.00040180434,0.007899776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072193664,0.0001352146,0.00014796229,0.00022549072,0.0022056303,0.0006357251,0.00094037695,0.0003302557,0.00018738548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006080182,0.00039770178,0.06930651,0.00011981647,0.00013434033,0.0051637725,0.017055966,0.031209068,0.02139893,0.8163944,0.0051609958,0.03305055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034063208,0.0005925644,0.2592516,0.00011827745,0.0001390285,0.0013300645,0.06207964,0.12859292,0.004871065,0.4881478,0.05439679,0.00013960726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014781962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02302019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014781962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017228869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006946695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029391825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169134223","doi":"","title":"Dynamic Intrahousehold Bargaining, Matrimonial Property Law and Suicide in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Demographic economics; Property (philosophy); Economics; Natural experiment; Survey data collection; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.009981693217579097,"score_gpt":0.23684252932452649,"score_spread":0.22686083610694738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169134223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.933888,0.0013359801,0.0054031066,0.0049829823,0.000035530386,0.000100902456,0.0011416863,0.000043476062,0.053068355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99210125,0.00045409374,0.00038131847,0.000076014156,0.0000061025903,0.00001209429,0.00014644723,0.0000041338803,0.0068185558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993292,0.000074074684,0.000011614146,0.0000732202,0.000110696055,0.00040130224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989166,0.0002866512,0.00024404663,0.00006540828,0.00020807216,0.0002792898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093719544,0.0003439378,0.0006299531,0.0010179994,0.0034107862,0.002468779,0.0015852503,0.0009894511,0.007305699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031372134,0.0002671138,0.00045502497,0.001471322,0.002724257,0.00084224413,0.0010016981,0.0010286896,0.00030584133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037146802,0.0003117105,0.20071281,0.00009640588,0.0001267854,0.001092908,0.004901185,0.18843395,0.0010746502,0.55701935,0.010855768,0.035003085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035612687,0.00022161398,0.31562433,0.00021946616,0.0001900416,0.00032795683,0.016747357,0.47686487,0.0008091392,0.13248976,0.055905737,0.00024369055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9882194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058921255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058921255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03276347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4275056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169279172","doi":"10.1111/1468-0335.00283","title":"Welfare Reform and Unemployment in New Zealand","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economica","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Economics; Welfare; Labour supply; Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Point (geometry); Unemployment rate; Economic welfare; Panel data; Demographic economics; Macroeconomics; Econometrics; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.023062938875955844,"score_gpt":0.2439609754411021,"score_spread":0.22089803656514626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169279172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98780525,0.0021767968,0.00005368124,0.0035627058,0.000023753713,0.000019906376,0.00020163487,0.0000029537414,0.0061533265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971572,0.0011021255,0.00004465946,0.0001868657,0.000016087526,0.000014375249,0.00009442738,0.0000019041921,0.001382383],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991431,0.00014955319,0.000057285793,0.00006694942,0.00015760439,0.00042553755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895394,0.00006584546,0.0005284647,0.000033421085,0.00013325385,0.0002849812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010349103,0.00012845706,0.00039484652,0.0008135984,0.0015266809,0.0012417104,0.00023507484,0.0005760234,0.0029943702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003541137,0.00015742845,0.00037777025,0.0014184087,0.001143211,0.0008656782,0.0013571868,0.00075371296,0.00012714835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013888873,0.0004273529,0.82054514,0.0005232503,0.00019017425,0.0015668771,0.040505894,0.0018419186,0.0034115345,0.017505089,0.0060345875,0.106059305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020757483,0.000050282742,0.99020314,0.000069011905,0.000016406997,0.00004232314,0.0028533472,0.00018189881,0.00004257303,0.00029618212,0.0062161647,0.000007886155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6889276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7566209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6889276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011381425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075139296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6258087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169974677","doi":"10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00036.x","title":"Are Parents Investing Less Time in Children? Trends in Selected Industrialized Countries","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Population and Development Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":419,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Developed country; Multivariate analysis; Demography; Population; Demographic economics; Developing country; Consistency (knowledge bases); Investment (military); Geography; Economic growth; Political science; Medicine; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06124117440261633,"score_gpt":0.3197459815087538,"score_spread":0.25850480710613744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169974677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736283,0.021259688,0.000049525257,0.00045543298,0.000018614459,0.000003796366,0.0017786967,0.00000706383,0.0027988753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852486,0.013365903,0.00008226259,0.000065844535,0.000016127944,0.0000058058326,0.0007763142,0.0000023745629,0.00043683272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998324,0.000041738196,0.000022842807,0.000037557264,0.000028721335,0.00003671336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991315,0.00014259251,0.00049832254,0.000023860097,0.00011987723,0.000083949184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004493527,0.00012466834,0.0002386434,0.001658996,0.00023031012,0.0006658086,0.00027314606,0.0002876217,0.0013694298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010546633,0.00011135814,0.00023960554,0.003093741,0.0002640895,0.0003363767,0.00023109096,0.00024818323,0.00020311048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000693061,0.000020148327,0.97330904,0.00019657498,0.000092432856,0.0002114494,0.0013784439,0.000083017316,0.00021353035,0.00034181526,0.0006974414,0.023386842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011690953,0.000029651512,0.9967841,0.00004519794,0.000016565318,0.0001504318,0.0012239786,0.000017657434,0.000034194232,0.000022365834,0.0016725832,0.000002085241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023718223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02782412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023718223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048385575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003419091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047160387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170401282","doi":"10.1093/cesifo/ifu006","title":"Do the Perils of Universal Childcare Depend on the Child's Age?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CESifo Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Subsidy; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.030795484295905253,"score_gpt":0.27027236612150657,"score_spread":0.2394768818256013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170401282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9486801,0.011362103,0.00039442626,0.020762209,0.00012912398,0.000031080737,0.001964782,0.000013451716,0.016662687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99744284,0.0010863695,0.000067830784,0.0005143023,0.000038373804,0.000006187969,0.0001770396,0.0000060895127,0.00066100474],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976179,0.00059273106,0.00008280438,0.00029323882,0.00040188586,0.0010115259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897517,0.004119843,0.0029499151,0.00085175905,0.0008764946,0.0014501965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038845872,0.00017862812,0.0006215406,0.00076689105,0.00077894656,0.0012405566,0.001065327,0.00075544417,0.008383029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019377008,0.00017489235,0.0008205477,0.001409861,0.0016910972,0.0022262458,0.0013973722,0.0011525644,0.00031927024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022395267,0.000052869942,0.9526571,0.00008427252,0.00020226745,0.00022996777,0.0017882226,0.00021788696,0.00014605574,0.0055281343,0.0020547034,0.036814492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033101644,0.0000230854,0.9952093,0.000073970856,0.00003425971,0.000037675763,0.0016649055,0.000058347745,0.00004578003,0.0007385444,0.0021057648,0.0000051997486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19329393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44146678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19329393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032769658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034117412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38433766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170453899","doi":"","title":"Child Care Costs and Mothers' Labor Supply: An Empirical Analysis for Germany","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; German; Estimation; Economics; Labour supply; West germany; Child care; Sample (material); Labour economics; Demographic economics; Panel data; Econometrics; Medicine","score_opus":0.030310159174931576,"score_gpt":0.3634444658621476,"score_spread":0.33313430668721605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170453899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977958,0.00058907433,0.0001880722,0.00011388175,0.0000036450572,0.000004942422,0.00070155604,0.0000066656394,0.0005963803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972398,0.0006475071,0.00011725212,0.000025406978,0.000007838162,0.00000876805,0.0012524569,0.0000041696817,0.0006966999],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996226,0.00009032334,0.000019660018,0.000056000306,0.00006006088,0.00015134798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984944,0.00085965695,0.0004116011,0.00008363028,0.000059935795,0.00009068377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007807118,0.0003745929,0.00056129764,0.0015084299,0.00030866923,0.00078308047,0.00034577068,0.00042897553,0.002916019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019864002,0.00020247258,0.00072511216,0.0020647508,0.00033472123,0.00044283015,0.0005321304,0.00034677953,0.00035822092],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005373075,0.00029267557,0.9420249,0.000198274,0.0005905233,0.0013388545,0.0013377358,0.015063838,0.0008401757,0.005164984,0.0033570498,0.029253745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003067399,0.00010884916,0.9864363,0.000053878284,0.00021252106,0.00018037614,0.0014834175,0.0077149305,0.00055643386,0.0003833395,0.0028201991,0.000019093888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06292215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04035656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06292215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015897584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056471134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12511182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171133954","doi":"10.1177/002795010300100112","title":"Evaluation Using Random Assignment Experiments: Demonstrating the Effectiveness of Earnings Supplements","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Institute Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Earnings; Random assignment; Welfare; Payment; Work (physics); Economics; Public economics; Quality (philosophy); Labour economics; Actuarial science; Demographic economics; Accounting; Statistics; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.09711467474454152,"score_gpt":0.3971232903705754,"score_spread":0.30000861562603387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171133954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46871844,0.014912483,0.35627297,0.0069999266,0.0047008577,0.07315445,0.0014585287,0.0008490068,0.07293337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71484005,0.005246616,0.20331177,0.0027310092,0.0008120117,0.06456612,0.00034346234,0.00016835763,0.007980493],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.76703334,0.2124818,0.0051304973,0.0049283667,0.009284891,0.0011411243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.51389563,0.42973974,0.026500106,0.018138979,0.009869038,0.0018565228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16238311,0.002801388,0.0032285168,0.001588889,0.0015264701,0.0025058708,0.0035592623,0.0043023042,0.010553635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33340746,0.0010444302,0.002367458,0.0015755263,0.005265893,0.0036812187,0.002406043,0.0025778457,0.001268185],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.18081574,0.04412654,0.007851197,0.022596529,0.006997816,0.0005924671,0.007511145,0.051927317,0.01269316,0.1365259,0.009932742,0.51842946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.17091078,0.3734549,0.014003349,0.007578491,0.00860226,0.00048000063,0.001992939,0.105331816,0.026161417,0.231559,0.059066825,0.00085825543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020803746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013659936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16238311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003763867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040974086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85877424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172109878","doi":"","title":"Charitable bequests and wealth at death in Great Britain","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; University of Oxford","keywords":"Probate; Bequest; Beneficiary; Quarter (Canadian coin); Population; Economics; Demographic economics; Actuarial science; Geography; Demography; Sociology; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.02677709464787655,"score_gpt":0.25084325655226974,"score_spread":0.22406616190439319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172109878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98506135,0.0039676316,0.000087181324,0.0022955348,0.000026783107,0.0000030296824,0.00033873913,0.0000035846886,0.008216194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978467,0.0010015601,0.00002049514,0.000055219636,0.000010958515,0.0000019083423,0.00009553416,0.0000019276652,0.0009657759],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999491,0.00023477497,0.000027585074,0.000048913505,0.00008271164,0.0001150126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726534,0.000896914,0.00096225564,0.00009552996,0.00021548508,0.000564478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075771805,0.000084033214,0.00022487453,0.0009196242,0.000628191,0.0009694429,0.0002363827,0.00031485225,0.005241879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053175115,0.00009990306,0.00012634922,0.0017715169,0.0010711092,0.0005467708,0.000989319,0.0005867727,0.00030179834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023560855,0.000051194347,0.9401135,0.00014082079,0.000094066396,0.00097260025,0.012966266,0.0006798031,0.00010375485,0.008558466,0.0070692315,0.029014654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007602351,0.000035261874,0.9875914,0.00011494594,0.0000123184345,0.00020826093,0.00443221,0.0002408294,0.000020228557,0.0015567869,0.0057692938,0.000010964855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059398986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10100401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059398986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017706242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042998945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118106484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172144121","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-627x.2004.00119.x","title":"Further Evidence on the Role of Gender in Financial Performance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Small Business Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sample (material); Psychology; Control (management); Finance; Social psychology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.03605043225771286,"score_gpt":0.2532636495971501,"score_spread":0.21721321733943721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172144121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947917,0.0004916502,0.00029067893,0.00045463137,0.000020261168,0.00000670558,0.00014226593,0.0000020725365,0.0037999083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992829,0.00005835233,0.00006970319,0.000058414516,0.000013486239,0.0000027570666,0.000035766327,0.0000014624095,0.0004772631],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877995,0.00047165947,0.000057254645,0.00022842266,0.0002348672,0.00022773686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854091,0.010006095,0.0022793813,0.00055336324,0.0005453666,0.0012066576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004099748,0.00022008385,0.00027927058,0.0009793027,0.0006776817,0.0006326082,0.00033225596,0.00044743525,0.012626436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011874491,0.00011278082,0.00033275617,0.0007458836,0.0011361381,0.0009106667,0.0008866489,0.0004529605,0.0005041826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000251704,0.00008866714,0.98753905,0.000024242512,0.00003006818,0.00020115208,0.0019083633,0.000035785495,0.0004812788,0.00075497566,0.00020024313,0.008484361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005819534,0.00016469085,0.99612856,0.000022681701,0.000014953008,0.00023456271,0.0016874565,0.0001320673,0.0001291946,0.0005254143,0.00094967056,0.0000049368746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025979758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004403289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012626436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023317852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004162895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042239666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172493141","doi":"10.1257/pol.5.1.179","title":"Public Transfers and Domestic Violence: The Roles of Private Information and Spousal Control","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Economic Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":316,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Economic rent; Domestic violence; Control (management); Poison control; Demographic economics; Medicine; Injury prevention; Environmental health; Psychology; Business; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.008034727721411937,"score_gpt":0.2453025236658316,"score_spread":0.23726779594441966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172493141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817655,0.0016357412,0.00086941314,0.0041660094,0.000025019033,0.000024246874,0.00021713824,0.0000091912,0.011287761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984983,0.00047273588,0.000051443487,0.00006956588,0.000025905429,0.0000062684685,0.000028097078,0.000001036226,0.00084672],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983211,0.0009165193,0.000051089413,0.000110282126,0.00018357694,0.00041736302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97941566,0.011892213,0.006761883,0.0005970369,0.00036744212,0.00096579053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018477231,0.00022633788,0.00044217886,0.0010513138,0.000803014,0.0024379012,0.0004616402,0.0011423271,0.013483591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014814183,0.00017460393,0.00030178452,0.0017188297,0.0019175657,0.001674538,0.0012722047,0.0008004492,0.00030428704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093108526,0.0009221451,0.84188265,0.00013790495,0.0002356086,0.00071438804,0.0020641708,0.0050096745,0.00034565074,0.06576342,0.0027644006,0.07922886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022992336,0.0011117863,0.88845223,0.00037903435,0.00039074186,0.0005709412,0.012462241,0.023449896,0.0007496629,0.06066525,0.011484422,0.000053956966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009363654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067326347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013483591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017324802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010592252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045107067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178978920","doi":"10.25336/p67s4m","title":"Economics of the Family","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.10287602898497311,"score_gpt":0.32617350362795855,"score_spread":0.22329747464298544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178978920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004333803,0.16522756,0.0016068291,0.16973966,0.0030767114,0.000026163392,0.00034965563,0.000037367627,0.6556023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26581332,0.09104404,0.00086100894,0.027867954,0.0031289686,0.00005675213,0.00016249875,0.00005866341,0.6110068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939847,0.00017741225,0.0000069219,0.000042965057,0.00020130455,0.00017284925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952304,0.00013178575,0.00002141691,0.000040724637,0.00012292487,0.00016003953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008136282,0.0003759029,0.00037953976,0.0005760251,0.0040433896,0.0044751493,0.00061330415,0.0026572533,0.016827833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021541868,0.0002013312,0.00023286148,0.0010549,0.0067889225,0.0026875164,0.00087038527,0.0022033113,0.0013693027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015821657,0.000016630554,0.0003728138,0.000039988976,0.000005376414,0.000044743138,0.00061650126,0.00029005032,0.00004442548,0.764851,0.21798697,0.015715709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008046818,0.000007745187,0.0012471003,0.0002009283,0.0000032971866,0.00004165732,0.0013011316,0.00009947497,0.000027722299,0.1934501,0.80360335,0.000009434215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41464245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45153034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58535755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014956426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014360194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82445794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179593737","doi":"10.1111/caje.12134","title":"Did Canadian welfare reform work? The effects of new reform strategies on social assistance participation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Sanctions; Demographics; Welfare; Economics; Welfare reform; Point (geometry); Social assistance; Social Welfare; Public economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Political science; Market economy; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.1310613180748482,"score_gpt":0.23761641117689097,"score_spread":0.10655509310204278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179593737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9477185,0.0021087697,0.00016451551,0.022853483,0.00007742904,0.000084190426,0.003546617,0.000021714714,0.023424763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99625957,0.0005417403,0.00009455099,0.0005457438,0.000020609228,0.000020264455,0.0005380747,0.0000049162813,0.0019744192],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99124473,0.0012523559,0.00020129858,0.00051376584,0.002486737,0.0043009925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98574406,0.0018800633,0.0023691698,0.0007968152,0.0055499417,0.0036599564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008101198,0.00037024167,0.0006764715,0.0020331126,0.0050534345,0.0029536574,0.002374304,0.0011420507,0.0058001834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021243803,0.0002465392,0.0009210597,0.0044439663,0.0029341679,0.0014403174,0.0027504445,0.0015595017,0.00030822578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006365128,0.00024039949,0.88762766,0.00016030484,0.00019090559,0.00012006392,0.011107075,0.0009825529,0.00042285604,0.0074292286,0.009933792,0.08114865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010863438,0.000045044235,0.9867951,0.00008794909,0.000036253514,0.000010741361,0.0050675133,0.00021353386,0.00011173483,0.00019748766,0.0074028503,0.000020922438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99223596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99542207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071603954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.071603954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11098336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51952547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181210956","doi":"10.25336/p68c89","title":"The early life courses of Canadian men: analysis of timing and sequences of events","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cohabitation; Life course approach; Demography; Early adulthood; Work (physics); Transition (genetics); Family life; Event (particle physics); Psychology; Demographic economics; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Young adult; Geography; Gender studies; Economics","score_opus":0.08575346622552465,"score_gpt":0.3269811195128692,"score_spread":0.24122765328734452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181210956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899014,0.0015420372,0.00029141858,0.00025180832,0.000011220211,0.000041836818,0.004248004,0.000013078608,0.003699065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934608,0.0010483842,0.0004281662,0.00003848373,0.0000058820215,0.000019847128,0.003528303,0.0000050427598,0.0014650386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949646,0.000038927607,0.000016987311,0.00007468866,0.00014257838,0.00023025331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878675,0.00014573005,0.00021108227,0.000048682632,0.0005147428,0.0002930277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005737812,0.0002565518,0.00035518475,0.0030509676,0.0023486442,0.0010479814,0.0007307993,0.00030601193,0.0018225028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027714993,0.00022484171,0.00037485652,0.004501879,0.0004995822,0.0003305401,0.0008741486,0.0004723161,0.00016214798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012738156,0.000027466112,0.96691984,0.000054320186,0.000054426382,0.00013471211,0.005929759,0.000465756,0.00044270896,0.00095154135,0.0012260842,0.02366596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012167014,0.000009807254,0.99612856,0.000016589129,0.000008297962,0.000026572123,0.0017073298,0.00020290905,0.000055152006,0.000054393244,0.001779865,0.0000091521215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9850492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99245036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014950812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00983343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014442645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07134682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2186356524","doi":"","title":"Cheap Maids and Nannies: How Low-skilled immigration is changing the labor supply of high-skilled American women","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Housekeeping; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Graduate degree; Economics; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.005599419132848035,"score_gpt":0.24503742422165412,"score_spread":0.23943800508880608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2186356524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891635,0.00044143593,0.000046121033,0.0040806453,0.00004186025,0.0000030513297,0.00006060079,0.000002535092,0.006160289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968637,0.00037198045,0.000038836028,0.0005203731,0.000036398313,0.000002965678,0.000037283047,0.0000016585128,0.0021267384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984586,0.000058125584,0.0000043932837,0.000019243887,0.000013780438,0.00005850208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958223,0.000085949236,0.00013656037,0.000017125867,0.000027585647,0.00015044305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038821466,0.00007767124,0.00008190682,0.0002699536,0.0010927509,0.00081196224,0.00023831641,0.00044133328,0.0057970057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015343319,0.000089359135,0.00022304582,0.00037361876,0.0006825367,0.0005583631,0.00046207357,0.0003796981,0.00025776544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026944745,0.00022347801,0.9158944,0.0000595878,0.00005987341,0.00062437775,0.016600559,0.00019764835,0.001097312,0.0049184514,0.007046656,0.053008262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000123262835,0.00006449413,0.9722792,0.000035784793,0.000026465741,0.00009574973,0.019522127,0.00012769912,0.00018469643,0.0007879351,0.0068533034,0.000010142932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036709044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07900539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036709044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056875503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006369487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072990716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2186954426","doi":"10.25336/p6ck55","title":"Renewing the Family: A History of Baby Boomers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Baby boomers; Sociology; Political science; Geography; Demographic economics; Demography; History; Economics","score_opus":0.12838393909875323,"score_gpt":0.32596035177760574,"score_spread":0.1975764126788525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2186954426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7159091,0.050901547,0.0006637014,0.14065811,0.0018515738,0.000100356694,0.0007212759,0.00004209503,0.08915219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484631,0.021998666,0.00027643688,0.01201706,0.00024019544,0.000033513603,0.00012210672,0.000055835902,0.016793102],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772054,0.0005284513,0.000035435307,0.00015796386,0.00031125214,0.0012463747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952893,0.00095826626,0.00029063332,0.00011644268,0.0010754783,0.0022698392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030758276,0.00031002,0.000694108,0.0023813772,0.034239475,0.0069332486,0.001504021,0.0025415292,0.00717871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005916073,0.00043540617,0.0003030826,0.005890167,0.016370928,0.0035732568,0.004752341,0.0067862347,0.0002271161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000898688,0.000050992745,0.017169701,0.00011058871,0.000013145822,0.0008916077,0.8840402,0.000039541126,0.00027630373,0.044367854,0.021555807,0.031394485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006619932,0.000022913475,0.03273393,0.0003935549,0.000017221686,0.00033684113,0.69079775,0.000034721375,0.00011013142,0.001845672,0.2736553,0.000045301884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97090155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043534942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043534942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07382358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31586957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187435965","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of Gender Gaps in India","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"India Policy Forum","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Percentile; Workforce; Wage; Gender gap; Demographic economics; Economics; Convergence (economics); Labour economics; Economic growth; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.013793867861816578,"score_gpt":0.29002944151126353,"score_spread":0.27623557364944695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187435965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838974,0.0011049744,0.00013410818,0.0025438839,0.00005557689,0.00000741035,0.002105132,0.00002800093,0.0101233935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979322,0.00024601963,0.000049929895,0.00011788188,0.000014214854,0.0000045944853,0.0004408692,0.0000041971134,0.0011901329],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993254,0.00007148451,0.000033198365,0.00007279563,0.000096763375,0.00040038495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982815,0.00028556856,0.0006515201,0.00009939636,0.00034720113,0.00033471754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005494477,0.00012245124,0.0002046772,0.0019488995,0.0009229256,0.0012405785,0.0004875238,0.00039564513,0.003059973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020615188,0.0001277827,0.0003259982,0.0029660775,0.0006923935,0.00071424135,0.0014826054,0.0009272365,0.00044555083],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036264013,0.00009691855,0.9084916,0.00019792248,0.000059921706,0.0010911877,0.014840132,0.0015522843,0.000835387,0.014318636,0.0077881445,0.050365366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017780116,0.000029559382,0.9887496,0.000035992758,0.0000073093183,0.00019524548,0.0043381243,0.00017689311,0.00016238354,0.0004719046,0.005818931,0.000012218901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06894385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09273159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06894385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024849665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021660135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13708514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190400701","doi":"10.25071/1927-9833.39577","title":"Introduction to the Inaugural issue","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Family Research and Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Library science; Work (physics); Political science; Editorial board; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.1187716692443917,"score_gpt":0.47274762793395175,"score_spread":0.35397595868956006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190400701","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008203022,0.027811257,0.0011062184,0.12318192,0.7546922,0.00018396377,0.00083922676,0.00033291208,0.09103207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014825161,0.03084833,0.0022293734,0.061829515,0.53619367,0.00067432056,0.0021957678,0.0010581301,0.3501458],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950772,0.0011471625,0.00047206733,0.00060269027,0.0020800915,0.0006207848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98126686,0.0036070168,0.0011815685,0.00087156263,0.009588146,0.003484758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006548925,0.0012474599,0.0010401437,0.0036447798,0.005103846,0.0130171515,0.0020667277,0.005034816,0.11576738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026760425,0.0006991889,0.0011025313,0.0021266625,0.0020038483,0.006870363,0.0044647567,0.009325022,0.04992029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026812839,0.00002802214,0.00015291147,0.00023530502,0.0000020570303,0.000085359134,0.00024219143,0.00001735364,0.00013206681,0.0067865634,0.9695991,0.02269226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029583555,0.000016754966,0.0004116116,0.00031234784,0.000001436791,0.00007154553,0.00015939114,0.000017677863,0.000032425665,0.0010735039,0.9978927,0.0000076076944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002987102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003988594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11576738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035947212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005993798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38728052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195533542","doi":"10.7202/010006ar","title":"Travail des femmes et fécondité dans les pays en développement : que nous a appris l’Enquête mondiale de la fécondité?","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014932546442193764,"score_gpt":0.26750834914933674,"score_spread":0.25257580270714297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195533542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95909363,0.007372426,0.0005943079,0.0073329415,0.00009235094,0.000020158079,0.00037040582,0.0000067585465,0.025116982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934348,0.0024591482,0.0002640049,0.00041230553,0.00002704702,0.000020366182,0.00005294378,0.0000037342918,0.0033258204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981236,0.000840677,0.00007719301,0.00021850683,0.00029804712,0.00044196288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99456656,0.002411669,0.0012915931,0.00026566675,0.0009488857,0.00051569706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035870215,0.00029955409,0.0004622355,0.0021007925,0.0057362807,0.0030513695,0.00072824326,0.0008215115,0.0073240646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009493454,0.00018122257,0.00023685081,0.00332284,0.0045480067,0.0020270331,0.0019808891,0.0010075888,0.00018305109],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009173183,0.000037751834,0.47733358,0.00042285488,0.00008114375,0.0005158039,0.44793487,0.00011559224,0.00047104614,0.02368244,0.0028111304,0.0465021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030270714,0.00004396526,0.62296724,0.00053932547,0.00004311284,0.00021764268,0.34543324,0.000071060924,0.00018441348,0.001690528,0.028768783,0.000037620903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.624832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7947916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.624832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078124357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007831839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7547549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198766346","doi":"10.1080/07078552.2004.11827140","title":"Can We Afford to Pay for Social Programs?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Political Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public economics; Economics; Business; Labour economics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.0728101177344135,"score_gpt":0.3725300388927565,"score_spread":0.299719921158343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198766346","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023488712,0.005168533,0.0050770324,0.60615796,0.0011892774,0.000045669833,0.00021849283,0.000114752875,0.3585396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8710815,0.00534646,0.0018837879,0.067827255,0.0021366584,0.00022562928,0.000110824425,0.00015050346,0.051237393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911453,0.0031336104,0.00010862163,0.0005467808,0.0016772456,0.0033884589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902811,0.0043292153,0.00068631105,0.0005752891,0.0011007104,0.0030273409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008087875,0.00047417873,0.0005680835,0.0017142858,0.0071388027,0.009222454,0.0016844743,0.008386403,0.04003516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02692878,0.00029361123,0.0007423886,0.0013079385,0.017969592,0.013637451,0.0069120848,0.0067046573,0.0016524295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002056837,0.000041016694,0.001393561,0.0000468449,0.000013821677,0.000038011916,0.0011596904,0.00024522975,0.00006973987,0.9582973,0.020661894,0.018012328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051556555,0.00004946027,0.0045538093,0.0004926279,0.000036881243,0.00007247137,0.0066942465,0.00054363435,0.00020715898,0.6536027,0.33365256,0.000042883188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.120544545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15587293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120544545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012408853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020003634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23968583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200018099","doi":"","title":"Connecting the Dots: The Early Impacts of Increased Paid Maternity Leave on Child Development","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Maternity leave; Parental leave; Observational study; Demographic economics; Psychology; Child care; Developmental psychology; Paternal care; Child development; Medicine; Nursing; Economics; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.026512033979862713,"score_gpt":0.2670176172937703,"score_spread":0.24050558331390762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200018099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940498,0.0006354416,0.000118141135,0.00091395754,0.000012573367,0.000009837066,0.0005547071,0.0000061638207,0.003699508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831426,0.0002176216,0.000086949694,0.00006112666,0.000006436788,0.0000054103202,0.00022552862,0.0000020156344,0.0010806147],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990522,0.00017286387,0.000020746977,0.00011077951,0.00021323071,0.0004302321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976356,0.00080824655,0.0006060109,0.00010667898,0.0002605041,0.0005829924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010649327,0.00014779533,0.0002688125,0.00048496973,0.00086119026,0.0010832286,0.0005313863,0.0006316782,0.005954116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005742964,0.00013886357,0.00031522076,0.0006310585,0.0006931442,0.00061720295,0.0016012737,0.000788955,0.00025298892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055027154,0.0002853172,0.9243208,0.0001044964,0.000090006826,0.00056159444,0.0091241235,0.0011378417,0.0011146029,0.0044289436,0.0021222467,0.056159876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004266762,0.00007344603,0.99444157,0.00003121935,0.00001672247,0.000018095188,0.0033601373,0.00011023251,0.000112976035,0.00016713313,0.00165982,0.0000045260113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43695983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6340177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43695983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043652016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046938746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8688329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202838156","doi":"10.25336/p69316","title":"Family Change and Implications for Family Solidarity and Social Cohesion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohesion (chemistry); Solidarity; Social psychology; Sociology; Diversity (politics); Psychology; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.18714429588642537,"score_gpt":0.36308578875053865,"score_spread":0.17594149286411329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202838156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50047624,0.024647754,0.0023877078,0.094520725,0.0004781515,0.000109658504,0.0005445912,0.000032378808,0.37680283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99432606,0.002145762,0.00020168818,0.00037792305,0.000049594848,0.000009671417,0.000025655718,0.0000025059144,0.0028611294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734336,0.00086490886,0.000044621513,0.00021347485,0.00039988075,0.0011338942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752134,0.0005808019,0.00037379016,0.000094177354,0.00047779203,0.0009520905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020698505,0.00018471833,0.0003420028,0.0015810363,0.007352658,0.0033297562,0.0010059879,0.001052896,0.0069598663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007123243,0.00011354383,0.00031936888,0.0016746352,0.011671499,0.0021219905,0.002729818,0.0012492744,0.00013654448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017192734,0.00015747928,0.15061468,0.00018042799,0.00007490878,0.0021408657,0.09486641,0.0011416452,0.0003994203,0.63607377,0.010056462,0.10412192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028740618,0.00015664863,0.50389296,0.0008516226,0.00006745327,0.0010800586,0.19889541,0.0006148764,0.00028543745,0.1674957,0.12655507,0.00007607408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54600334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53920406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45399666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018474786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014531188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9133407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204990715","doi":"","title":"Adjust Me if I Can’t: The Effect of Firm Incentives on Labor Supply Responses to Taxes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Universitas Pasundan institutional repositories & scientific journals (Universitas Pasundan)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung; Washington Center for Equitable Growth","keywords":"Payroll tax; Economics; Labour economics; Incentive; Payroll; Labor demand; Payment; Empirical evidence; Income tax; Wage; Microeconomics; Public economics","score_opus":0.022403352599262842,"score_gpt":0.2767735549199262,"score_spread":0.2543702023206634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2204990715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710605,0.00014889058,0.0032653955,0.0014560287,0.000051486135,0.00004573009,0.00020027393,0.0000547904,0.023716746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976579,0.000036481095,0.0003514467,0.0001348733,0.0000090086305,0.00001272455,0.000028627785,0.000008216167,0.001760654],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990625,0.0004543627,0.000036084253,0.00012461856,0.00011854295,0.00020398662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902507,0.005217139,0.002577236,0.00090300635,0.00038309203,0.0006688358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017851433,0.00021110817,0.0002636035,0.00042700334,0.00062999,0.0013457079,0.0003873884,0.0006651962,0.015096205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01686504,0.00019037284,0.0002884524,0.0003964206,0.0006983139,0.00083111157,0.00069864606,0.00072437484,0.0012838636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005603064,0.0024220073,0.5401633,0.0004007288,0.00042800108,0.0015146513,0.0052090655,0.034484394,0.025820894,0.11649736,0.019925302,0.2475313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002757457,0.0012460117,0.88025194,0.00013268799,0.00014933085,0.00042517856,0.005218787,0.032792147,0.005956462,0.055984046,0.017466934,0.00010073299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021094016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020429583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015096205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000410256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050501883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206572531","doi":"10.25916/sut.26261717","title":"The Ivy Compton-Burnett School of Sociology: family culture and everyday life","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Everyday life; Sociology; Gender studies; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02907969790265764,"score_gpt":0.301804358901103,"score_spread":0.2727246609984454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206572531","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016387707,0.37816253,0.006291231,0.34536496,0.00878573,0.00008272819,0.00017389285,0.00013947707,0.24461173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42960772,0.33996713,0.008195907,0.045421995,0.005503162,0.00038017795,0.0001661535,0.00033759334,0.17042023],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753845,0.0014050658,0.00007865556,0.00032584107,0.00042695238,0.0002251261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994875,0.002967424,0.0002807213,0.00026389945,0.00046834612,0.0011446358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029786346,0.00070641097,0.00082067196,0.0024806384,0.010134357,0.011151152,0.0010592338,0.0038436318,0.005144934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053267786,0.00061262964,0.0002572246,0.003231148,0.01911642,0.0070698746,0.0029900982,0.007760224,0.00074260833],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000345061,0.00006955689,0.0032561293,0.00047942062,0.000022275733,0.0005249315,0.14163285,0.0003206386,0.00038350502,0.37109345,0.39929992,0.0828828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007062521,0.000021611952,0.003819584,0.0020116451,0.0000061023875,0.0003360429,0.05503372,0.0001416808,0.00015148598,0.076864526,0.86157376,0.000032772386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097014576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09792806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097014576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014347754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011465375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19289976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2207034128","doi":"10.1080/02255189.2016.1122580","title":"Determinants of labour market gender inequalities in Cameroon, Senegal and Mali: the role of human capital and fertility burden","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Française de Développement; David and Lucile Packard Foundation","keywords":"Fertility; Human capital; Inequality; Economics; Gender inequality; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Geography; Population; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.04365641339692507,"score_gpt":0.2622304246504898,"score_spread":0.21857401125356474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2207034128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970005,0.0007812827,0.00008827241,0.0003161482,0.000007953408,0.000009155408,0.00021114752,0.0000012066085,0.0015842688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995542,0.00020989378,0.000028604674,0.0000160994,0.000003009768,0.0000041145245,0.000035331628,4.0115432e-7,0.00014825063],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996332,0.00010594802,0.000013744882,0.000034703244,0.00003092911,0.00018147995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928266,0.00023500423,0.00028871853,0.000022319855,0.00004895142,0.00012230394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058766396,0.00028100554,0.00021648296,0.0010889393,0.00076280726,0.0007836045,0.00021592782,0.00022249039,0.003234284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013477216,0.00012227202,0.00019062714,0.0015196906,0.00093771884,0.00067782507,0.000920375,0.00042717697,0.00011151923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008209828,0.000034979555,0.9815278,0.00006895248,0.000036243106,0.0004406312,0.0036650086,0.00020284903,0.00046253297,0.0022814171,0.00029086694,0.010906632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000195665,0.000025011323,0.9924091,0.00006630821,0.000011706372,0.000103566774,0.0057417112,0.00020342294,0.000086114414,0.00021313113,0.0011329192,0.0000052164446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051694825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093410924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051694825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010452658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084071385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10278785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210106209","doi":"10.1111/caje.12322","title":"Intra‐household allocation of parental leave","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Demographic economics; Consumption (sociology); Distribution (mathematics); Duration (music); Parental leave; Human capital; Time allocation; Pareto principle; Labour economics; Economic growth; Operations management","score_opus":0.11668821550162653,"score_gpt":0.2107560446925557,"score_spread":0.09406782919092918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210106209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8980718,0.00018372276,0.07326546,0.0010019416,0.000033476557,0.000043312677,0.0002935691,0.000059960177,0.027046613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948862,0.000038060756,0.00077140215,0.000017638695,0.0000068790782,0.000013513059,0.00003299295,0.000006530644,0.0042267516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919695,0.00032977248,0.000023410066,0.00017236521,0.00010629052,0.00017125694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889165,0.00039204,0.00022914865,0.00023486972,0.00009127664,0.00016096978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000937015,0.0002682835,0.0005264826,0.00035668217,0.000581121,0.0013362551,0.0011526417,0.0007754756,0.013731829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028563535,0.00021189911,0.0005502606,0.00035297257,0.0009317079,0.0011247826,0.0010386019,0.0005477262,0.0006431641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004482031,0.00047863385,0.104752205,0.00008772884,0.00026577688,0.0007668951,0.002305567,0.41155896,0.0058249016,0.42933205,0.0029123148,0.04126685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000698197,0.00026071758,0.062768035,0.00005470498,0.00009521149,0.00029688075,0.002800154,0.68181854,0.0010249676,0.24402635,0.006721293,0.00006327283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070042596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005692988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013731829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016536704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048525597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045937598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212939246","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1638133","title":"Child Support Guidelines and Divorce Rates","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Child support; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014215412013455714,"score_gpt":0.2994337550064609,"score_spread":0.2852183429930052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212939246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99106556,0.0015938157,0.00009153985,0.0016366887,0.000039798397,0.000033282562,0.0013706872,0.000011895954,0.004156619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973654,0.0006042099,0.000088761655,0.00020529875,0.000023399758,0.000024662235,0.0005120386,0.0000066914827,0.0011695519],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789655,0.00077541196,0.00030801605,0.000113464164,0.0004650682,0.00044150703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96989655,0.00877271,0.014136633,0.0006724978,0.0022046906,0.0043170433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002427847,0.000091391805,0.00028917767,0.0020474945,0.00089071295,0.0010895116,0.0007216278,0.0009549586,0.008532019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03761793,0.0001693347,0.0004048964,0.0023996113,0.00031084748,0.00080551085,0.0010545438,0.0017434832,0.00072411774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014306174,0.00015356031,0.9864482,0.000020479412,0.00002542921,0.000117038515,0.00035443142,0.000052932548,0.00003312011,0.0002790681,0.0010250171,0.011347642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016504699,0.000132205,0.9948684,0.00009734286,0.00003080236,0.00038793296,0.0021877254,0.00020995662,0.000085211715,0.00025390656,0.0017209456,0.0000090405865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01977783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037634797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01977783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095024233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017255881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039325416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220239759","doi":"","title":"A Cournot-Nash Model of Family Decision Making","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Economics; Cournot competition; Interdependence; Bargaining power; Microeconomics; Bargaining problem","score_opus":0.0797432021117367,"score_gpt":0.3799196726919274,"score_spread":0.3001764705801907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220239759","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08239129,0.0011610975,0.68687516,0.003775387,0.00017706743,0.00021086798,0.00073178404,0.0001912913,0.22448607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90306276,0.0010135836,0.05127566,0.00030144778,0.00009292389,0.00023920937,0.00020610167,0.000025394384,0.043783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901104,0.00047581302,0.000027460224,0.00014759158,0.00020119637,0.00013687453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942976,0.00031162717,0.00006579219,0.000041999996,0.00007142676,0.00007938324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088856794,0.0007111426,0.0006937423,0.00034506663,0.00096447277,0.0019877136,0.0015344023,0.0013656301,0.007979229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019391903,0.00032177995,0.00060305523,0.0006861348,0.0015132993,0.002407962,0.0007957856,0.001127812,0.00086736714],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022893813,0.000027591357,0.0002453143,0.000024223846,0.000012788708,0.00021482732,0.00023919505,0.1580612,0.00019933566,0.83564675,0.0011554826,0.0041503757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004204576,0.000036644575,0.00023852826,0.00001645986,0.00000931183,0.00008711178,0.00012958518,0.5004643,0.00009351507,0.4900637,0.008797325,0.000021465496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01282341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009116479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01282341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022673511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016075851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026693225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2221318249","doi":"","title":"One Hundred Years of Women's Wage-fixing","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Demographic economics; Economics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.12307656593693327,"score_gpt":0.3027705284123593,"score_spread":0.17969396247542602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2221318249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77410775,0.04242005,0.0008797974,0.042085286,0.0013417188,0.000032406413,0.00015641029,0.000027274365,0.13894922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94596356,0.010245208,0.00029540097,0.0027293575,0.00023787096,0.000017580473,0.000045153214,0.00001993248,0.040446013],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905044,0.00025131216,0.00004085862,0.00016278769,0.00021132291,0.000283302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913293,0.00028912575,0.0001747966,0.00006757498,0.00018130975,0.00015428114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020727885,0.00018632488,0.0002080576,0.00078529393,0.0051680277,0.002564786,0.0005295529,0.0011093223,0.0047781556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003243758,0.00024948263,0.00017657399,0.0014077043,0.008118524,0.0025125304,0.0026516607,0.0023842938,0.00035180768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012858734,0.000067776535,0.009276721,0.00041599112,0.000020742833,0.0011776201,0.60331976,0.00014930524,0.0015820067,0.2187284,0.017250465,0.14788264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011360895,0.00012682924,0.039325256,0.0007209651,0.000009640092,0.00047908878,0.12555599,0.00008492221,0.00055446,0.010285291,0.8228136,0.000032597894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056960218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11847928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056960218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009524806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050864685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11325735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222013878","doi":"","title":"Time, Money and Inequality in International Perspective","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Inequality; Distribution (mathematics); Demographic economics; Economic inequality; Income distribution; German; Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Labour economics; Geography","score_opus":0.025107455387868356,"score_gpt":0.2887853443340255,"score_spread":0.2636778889461571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222013878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42659676,0.014634945,0.0026767473,0.01202018,0.00028468794,0.000013676813,0.00082259666,0.000018543913,0.5429318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933062,0.002684936,0.00016865377,0.00023732697,0.00013739034,0.0000070343,0.0000869446,0.00000717874,0.003364263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963987,0.00014215944,0.000009785511,0.000042102318,0.000059533846,0.00010651779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994822,0.00020637746,0.00013029363,0.00003215492,0.000052197163,0.00009679554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044573352,0.00022051825,0.00026707814,0.0019401265,0.0012031834,0.0031123203,0.00018688677,0.00044088962,0.015402596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011551292,0.00005528463,0.00017032119,0.0030812274,0.0024139383,0.0029884344,0.0015974978,0.0006870791,0.00031797893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000780987,0.00006539208,0.029446661,0.00006789916,0.000052048774,0.0003812012,0.017613836,0.0007689362,0.00031900103,0.90600765,0.0064173844,0.038782034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023307943,0.00012382279,0.20755315,0.00040142043,0.00006030849,0.00062503346,0.087589666,0.0019253175,0.00028257005,0.5353371,0.16604027,0.0000381311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004823908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054729404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015402596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011148747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029342234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051526785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225541930","doi":"","title":"The Power of the Purse: New Evidence on the Distribution of Income and Expenditures within the Family from a Canadian Experiment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distribution (mathematics); Household income; Demographic economics; Economics; Scale (ratio); Family income; Labour economics; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.019086281119150582,"score_gpt":0.2494564174323337,"score_spread":0.23037013631318312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225541930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9651782,0.0007623142,0.0010300574,0.0008960682,0.000028679555,0.00010514574,0.002962449,0.000020814756,0.029016322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891076,0.00032516377,0.0007823204,0.0002575183,0.000010701203,0.00007474439,0.0013324468,0.000039274022,0.008070227],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958253,0.0014107005,0.00010600665,0.0007543356,0.0012337648,0.0006699699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975936,0.01211267,0.001972208,0.0046823863,0.0037480453,0.0015487185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009398386,0.00056712056,0.00089494814,0.0011803765,0.00616415,0.0021862607,0.0021167062,0.00079500873,0.013308982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024929611,0.0003569492,0.000553054,0.0031153518,0.003964593,0.0012152253,0.0016899793,0.0010931772,0.00059269555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00979486,0.0026053116,0.6864017,0.0005887322,0.0013503719,0.0007659762,0.058391422,0.005689384,0.0076097674,0.06225793,0.042329345,0.12221525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003751585,0.00022413598,0.94909054,0.00009889819,0.00028368022,0.000089314184,0.012853622,0.0027059151,0.0012573861,0.0051956805,0.027623747,0.0002018058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9882804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99110514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025145996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025145996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017615385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18244779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228347071","doi":"","title":"The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values/Earning and Caring in Canadian Families/Women's Caring: Feminist Perspectives on Social Welfare (Book)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Population Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Sociology; Social Welfare; Gender studies; Economics; Psychology; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.047400161821393366,"score_gpt":0.3005209581892919,"score_spread":0.2531207963678985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228347071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052780993,0.17584248,0.0023012585,0.15749668,0.0034577919,0.000089688976,0.0003670675,0.00006017639,0.6076039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62825584,0.08897997,0.0021099858,0.008133777,0.0010160195,0.000090851325,0.000106402294,0.00008074537,0.2712264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907815,0.00018805887,0.000014045931,0.000047984446,0.00030526478,0.00036649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991085,0.0003581293,0.000032585183,0.000020681195,0.00028041162,0.00019963642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015882327,0.00054721837,0.0004801583,0.0016975098,0.0141495,0.008775358,0.0013246957,0.0020141802,0.008344652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022711374,0.00026504576,0.00027787065,0.0044444683,0.017820356,0.0030413335,0.0016246429,0.0024528299,0.0002766615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024194416,0.00003304053,0.001713495,0.0001336165,0.0000052627515,0.00028910252,0.055963423,0.00034437576,0.00017580985,0.78497356,0.10565529,0.050688863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008197999,0.000014181105,0.01254096,0.0007137668,0.000020923007,0.00022498771,0.11909742,0.00029265595,0.00017744809,0.08986543,0.77699727,0.000046745172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97939634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99469477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08419248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08419248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.107963726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.610862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232655883","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2010.01600.x","title":"Love and taxes – and matching institutions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Redistribution of income and wealth; Economics; Matching (statistics); Labour economics; Passive income; Demographic economics; Gross income; Microeconomics; Public economics; State income tax; Tax reform; Political science","score_opus":0.12175072179752569,"score_gpt":0.2261057378556832,"score_spread":0.1043550160581575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232655883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7715428,0.00096546824,0.009574124,0.007553681,0.000070683614,0.00006512182,0.00015961248,0.000027448275,0.21004105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99661297,0.000113745344,0.00033772306,0.00010106981,0.000015652975,0.000008279796,0.000012272436,0.0000031501456,0.0027951177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817216,0.000932933,0.000094760064,0.00022920556,0.0002848326,0.00028615797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918305,0.002549642,0.0028180038,0.0009734028,0.0005291081,0.0012993157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003185477,0.000118403346,0.0003872717,0.0007749847,0.0021003436,0.0031091443,0.00038696892,0.0009162893,0.020394502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012817256,0.00016323233,0.00018621635,0.00071609585,0.0043910583,0.0021151016,0.002128656,0.00064629293,0.00059705647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021815182,0.00029665505,0.04655709,0.000046582947,0.00003912985,0.00014217196,0.0017410935,0.0014701367,0.0004618574,0.9171053,0.0015281027,0.030393742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074109535,0.00014456984,0.07062754,0.00010477046,0.0000330844,0.00027738928,0.004293199,0.0044878796,0.00083495927,0.8981755,0.020914523,0.000032445605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014543467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016604189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020394502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002281088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011842805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0682264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234406831","doi":"","title":"Female Labor Force Participation in Latin America: Evidence of Deceleration","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Americanae (AECID Library)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad Nacional de La Plata; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Latin Americans; Demographic economics; Economics; Econometrics; Political science; Demography; Sociology; Population; Census","score_opus":0.058818557686649876,"score_gpt":0.33375076760106337,"score_spread":0.2749322099144135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234406831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99096316,0.0013833395,0.00022872223,0.00059689436,0.000012838618,0.0000061113055,0.0019111898,0.000017334076,0.0048804106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975103,0.0005939603,0.00009031688,0.00007041672,0.000021242551,0.000008389178,0.0010318992,0.000006567344,0.0006668317],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996358,0.00009063665,0.00002677868,0.000087594904,0.00004924254,0.000109885805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971831,0.00059485255,0.001417493,0.00023318155,0.00034267,0.00022871241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008424404,0.0001612983,0.00025917456,0.0014077619,0.00027979267,0.00069307286,0.00030898929,0.0002594814,0.003345882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034268266,0.00014308827,0.00020509918,0.002500016,0.0004357697,0.00041437795,0.0006887111,0.00031408295,0.0003746229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005954734,0.000011653107,0.9896597,0.000038645456,0.00003247453,0.000055055065,0.0011403961,0.00007466496,0.00029437832,0.0002421132,0.00056369184,0.007827702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017924123,0.000011310863,0.99764603,0.000013456741,0.0000046857795,0.00003889732,0.00063354534,0.000044376957,0.000046715348,0.00004148116,0.0015155997,0.0000021156266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020884173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021510815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020884173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034136925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003383215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041525245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240119872","doi":"","title":"Hidden in the Past: How Labour Relations Policy and Law Perpetuate Women's Economic Inequality","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Gender inequality; Economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.025065688615503224,"score_gpt":0.277010358408589,"score_spread":0.2519446697930858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240119872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6259714,0.004182748,0.0016645774,0.10772489,0.0002844271,0.00002827731,0.00023534881,0.000028228595,0.2598801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99303573,0.00040182576,0.000098729324,0.0011310282,0.00003999306,0.0000071218656,0.0000137748875,0.000012739227,0.005259123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947944,0.0013746691,0.00007164865,0.0003527188,0.0009841854,0.0024223696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99353987,0.003347214,0.00074838306,0.00047092605,0.0009395276,0.00095404143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007079847,0.0002033653,0.00053705595,0.0031294134,0.026769452,0.015780523,0.0020549314,0.0035915151,0.00787633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016454326,0.00031202685,0.00030086524,0.0036448424,0.041195422,0.00786102,0.0064897295,0.004501135,0.0002499083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005635564,0.00005441737,0.018325757,0.000030104075,0.000014814404,0.00021204219,0.19360916,0.0003123759,0.00017767411,0.76290584,0.00530696,0.018994533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039642484,0.000041065025,0.073750146,0.00052507216,0.000061938605,0.0001344306,0.48049006,0.0010299864,0.0005043364,0.26934952,0.17398259,0.00009124934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7500467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87780416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24995333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05176715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050776143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50285065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240746250","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.34.1.93","title":"The Impact on Subsequent Violence of Returning to an Abusive Partner","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Social psychology; Psychology; Criminology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.11542081981023324,"score_gpt":0.4263565059999797,"score_spread":0.3109356861897465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240746250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99854904,0.00015842331,0.00011734024,0.00008966218,0.000007378762,0.0000047099848,0.00004846465,0.0000031658667,0.0010217712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936265,0.00016549014,0.00008450999,0.000019664094,0.0000069303046,0.0000027839362,0.00006774217,0.0000015569179,0.00028870392],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875593,0.0005980377,0.00006926133,0.00008779241,0.00019780193,0.00029123592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325293,0.0025136557,0.0022196975,0.00036310128,0.00045130544,0.0011991941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010383506,0.00024117807,0.00030699116,0.00051902526,0.00073758356,0.0009231424,0.00028344578,0.00052407157,0.004179848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012341819,0.00015821189,0.00048030796,0.00032568787,0.0007034601,0.0003867189,0.0010355021,0.0009426995,0.00041172266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029709583,0.00025151033,0.97687453,0.000029783096,0.00012196951,0.00043545992,0.0006833771,0.00058291014,0.0009121684,0.00033831073,0.00011514301,0.01935768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036926244,0.00039222164,0.9965958,0.000019227467,0.00004625645,0.000531597,0.001175914,0.00035905698,0.0003189915,0.00023091199,0.00031817175,0.000008258959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004338714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006782328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004338714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038082674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031911107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013982952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244523554","doi":"","title":"The Political Is Personal: Middle-Income Families in the U.S. and Canada in the Great Recession","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Society for Social Work and Research 17th Annual Conference: Social Work for a Just Society: Making Visible the Stakes and Stakeholders","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Recession; Politics; Political science; Personal income; Economics; Economic growth; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.15493935404031148,"score_gpt":0.3712489328354274,"score_spread":0.21630957879511595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244523554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9432044,0.0024329515,0.000061695944,0.038683407,0.00017349652,0.000041915067,0.0004927149,0.0000074585955,0.014901993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897855,0.0017365667,0.000043500346,0.0029548248,0.000024971168,0.000019789815,0.00013311906,0.000010307063,0.0052914554],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975464,0.000231095,0.0000306316,0.000089657355,0.00025889755,0.0018433129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969308,0.00015708468,0.00020520968,0.000034970733,0.00060733204,0.0020646325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001257652,0.00026986946,0.000500793,0.0012045227,0.029677209,0.005735283,0.0021627622,0.0019679544,0.00688236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033754571,0.0003496907,0.0003409352,0.0034211152,0.0069304127,0.0023034008,0.005074461,0.0039401036,0.0002974765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000366741,0.0002981805,0.30396587,0.00014020051,0.000057650723,0.0022304563,0.5585479,0.00034040117,0.00042295043,0.019465575,0.06362536,0.050538685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008585139,0.000014825048,0.10297578,0.00012863072,0.000014576207,0.000108339824,0.87616044,0.000094617055,0.000056237594,0.00061267015,0.019793922,0.000031421645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06622666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06622666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13119419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4805103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244890010","doi":"10.1086/657123","title":"The Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Marriage and Divorce","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Development and Cultural Change","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Demographic economics; Conditional cash transfer; Marriage market; Cash; Marital status; Transfer (computing); Labour economics; Economic growth; Demography; Finance; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.036100268105044735,"score_gpt":0.28618004363305627,"score_spread":0.2500797755280115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244890010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99652475,0.00044238966,0.000069453745,0.00029428359,0.000007873229,0.000013560108,0.00012495798,0.0000036724844,0.0025190548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908626,0.00023576812,0.000030150757,0.000036683447,0.000007739456,0.000007680232,0.0000606248,5.8962155e-7,0.0005345209],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864,0.00069204083,0.00003408248,0.00005623808,0.00016894827,0.00040877567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99354595,0.003212435,0.0018478734,0.0001504624,0.00024680758,0.0009964076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013428406,0.00015261474,0.0001602268,0.0007067564,0.0009374138,0.00053326646,0.00034419762,0.0003139036,0.006931197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008328139,0.00009192023,0.0003318533,0.0005723065,0.0006454558,0.00045725447,0.0013540605,0.0006386948,0.00018108524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003012918,0.0024220957,0.86460763,0.00012086017,0.00028206673,0.0009838,0.0016476846,0.002630765,0.00066326756,0.005104961,0.0016702667,0.116853796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006538376,0.0011522478,0.99187005,0.000047203335,0.00010071312,0.00017107828,0.0019529901,0.0009654579,0.00040217402,0.001316838,0.0019434709,0.000012376099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013440414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023755627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013440414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013755327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009812583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026724339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247909283","doi":"","title":"Equal Families, Equal Parents, Equal Spouses, Equal Marriage: The Case of the Missing Patriarch","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tributary; Patriarchy; Law; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Neutrality; Political science; Geography; Social science","score_opus":0.016713383836814935,"score_gpt":0.2810768293110195,"score_spread":0.2643634454742046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247909283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4439841,0.017360536,0.0015294941,0.32056376,0.0015682934,0.000040894152,0.00004569505,0.000018914974,0.21488829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97268605,0.0024801146,0.00017284988,0.013641425,0.0003040364,0.000027486278,0.000006788936,0.000012230252,0.010669049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940367,0.003695485,0.000077258395,0.000350494,0.000378759,0.0014613445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964439,0.0018495447,0.00032175903,0.00018890992,0.00023914273,0.0009566685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058817626,0.00033502514,0.00064708735,0.0007427952,0.04044512,0.0072158314,0.0015740021,0.008642261,0.007008025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008014931,0.00048642806,0.00038436754,0.0011482512,0.034930233,0.009036307,0.008008482,0.012801458,0.0005309762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034966997,0.00007042166,0.0021609694,0.000040597217,0.000007657605,0.007169455,0.46011677,0.00006209997,0.00004545307,0.503209,0.018307233,0.008775345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045277513,0.00004834516,0.0018761683,0.00044562228,0.000015481039,0.0056286044,0.7520193,0.00027674012,0.00011052996,0.09628276,0.14321095,0.000040261973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04370482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05173838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04370482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065569957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005393288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08690083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2250116063","doi":"","title":"The Demographic Foundations of Rising Employment and Earnings Among Single Mothers in Canada and the United States, 1980 to 2000","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Baby boom; Earnings; Demographic economics; Welfare; Welfare state; Economics; Boom; Single mothers; Population; Demographic change; Cohort; Demography; Labour economics; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.061062081819386355,"score_gpt":0.3376095707773017,"score_spread":0.27654748895791537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2250116063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922506,0.0010282954,0.0000322308,0.0011708912,0.000020895142,0.000014682877,0.0021023287,0.0000052811597,0.0033746972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99668044,0.0009361614,0.00005320933,0.00012791903,0.000009150767,0.000007157732,0.0007080231,0.0000021148774,0.0014757982],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953127,0.00001533617,0.00001263936,0.000047271722,0.00013309941,0.000260388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825066,0.000079146346,0.00024285322,0.00003063119,0.00086508243,0.0005315061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059708545,0.00013807268,0.00022735442,0.0017167217,0.0028157628,0.0011533414,0.0007573041,0.00035778066,0.0020965622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002013424,0.00014826792,0.00019380101,0.0026119617,0.00076511654,0.00037768434,0.00086294283,0.00071155984,0.00017019406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017114759,0.00005457923,0.96449006,0.00003319658,0.0000296929,0.00021947554,0.0045300107,0.00020472554,0.00021571277,0.001073683,0.003392831,0.0255848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037267766,0.000008141955,0.9938496,0.000024682142,0.000007966191,0.000034438024,0.003825774,0.00010736896,0.00006507283,0.000046134177,0.0020214058,0.000005583814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9926118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027135236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027135236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0275948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19688088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253247878","doi":"","title":"The Contribution of Effective Marginal Tax Rates to Work Disincentives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CDU eSpace Institutional Repository (Charles Darwin University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Incentive; Payment; Work (physics); Labour economics; Business; Public economics; Economics; Finance; Economic growth; Microeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.009466971458395321,"score_gpt":0.22780346357477735,"score_spread":0.21833649211638204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253247878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71586096,0.012344979,0.01515726,0.030801287,0.00072316936,0.00027317097,0.001259443,0.00015515387,0.2234246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923304,0.0015801347,0.00065565726,0.0005500864,0.00014665157,0.000025656678,0.00006236372,0.000030590458,0.0046184403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99310714,0.0031888245,0.00029580123,0.0003963758,0.0015138142,0.0014980225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9640635,0.018533915,0.007728116,0.0024877682,0.0043387343,0.0028477989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008693589,0.00030452968,0.0005259692,0.002059216,0.0014092642,0.0034944806,0.0011330027,0.00085626123,0.010410844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04920145,0.00033426422,0.0005635526,0.0013730661,0.0027967375,0.0016417627,0.002353261,0.0015673104,0.00043924668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038214625,0.0002528592,0.336457,0.0004576914,0.00040923932,0.0005752988,0.0038227292,0.01112726,0.00042979995,0.49402758,0.013895518,0.13816275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077337674,0.00032369135,0.6599668,0.0012728806,0.0003223436,0.0010682992,0.010029102,0.008060051,0.0009183721,0.20382895,0.11390777,0.00022443071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02167389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021566443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02167389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040194723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004357112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04597664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254359292","doi":"","title":"Group Size and Social Interaction: a Canada-US Comparison of Interracial Marriage","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Census; White (mutation); Demography; Contrast (vision); Demographic economics; Ethnic group; Race (biology); Geography; Gender studies; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Population; Law","score_opus":0.05877278791496306,"score_gpt":0.36960209221640794,"score_spread":0.3108293043014449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254359292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99559206,0.00029754365,0.000048248105,0.00022389968,0.000009119904,0.000013083007,0.00081616803,0.0000037434288,0.0029961874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806505,0.00022403518,0.000055375807,0.000045165696,0.0000027868653,0.000005808941,0.0007745307,0.000003985875,0.0008233375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913305,0.00009247829,0.000024136969,0.00010585089,0.00027664477,0.0003677994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972289,0.00034571884,0.00043171068,0.000111686655,0.0008988155,0.0009830779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081483624,0.00025762222,0.00043678135,0.0025560814,0.0039949277,0.0014637532,0.0009217287,0.00043127802,0.0035636213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037551979,0.00017343166,0.00043147273,0.0051417253,0.0012833239,0.0004714352,0.0019158873,0.00059154595,0.00020753435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002988794,0.00016356385,0.97117305,0.00003459384,0.00013707859,0.000111975496,0.009912899,0.00024898612,0.00030596185,0.0016360809,0.0026680145,0.013308965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010676813,0.0000239449,0.99254745,0.000015549447,0.00002184112,0.000019795552,0.0058902176,0.00024119829,0.000044158118,0.00008250712,0.0010911718,0.000011476734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98915595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016731432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016731432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016825397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12139559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254622423","doi":"","title":"The New Mothers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.020794433003574368,"score_gpt":0.26884685935394653,"score_spread":0.24805242635037217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254622423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024760572,0.008471561,0.0003991718,0.097733006,0.008425233,0.00008503216,0.0006784219,0.00007116442,0.85937583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058048535,0.0034019111,0.00026134288,0.0068678334,0.00034668544,0.000044644024,0.00015101295,0.000041965664,0.93083614],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865437,0.00018716804,0.000023066135,0.00014539828,0.00041721176,0.00057273795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998406,0.00012459085,0.000075159354,0.00009226438,0.00037984343,0.00092223426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013710448,0.00031123182,0.00028493628,0.00082819274,0.011218883,0.00501344,0.00089561817,0.0013396918,0.06927994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003009383,0.0002940519,0.00022234024,0.0010929274,0.0020298518,0.0023086339,0.003408662,0.0035383755,0.00843547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056370915,0.000039104678,0.0040986454,0.00007916391,0.0000042290444,0.00045293575,0.030897424,0.00002359676,0.0005511634,0.1552057,0.6866792,0.12191256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018726672,0.0000038995845,0.0022169899,0.000035111258,0.000001215921,0.000039581748,0.007567906,0.00000438947,0.00004430811,0.0004641883,0.9896171,0.0000034135837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.414404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7521734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.414404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014324388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018679114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8239838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255951148","doi":"","title":"Double Jeopardy: Motherwork and the Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Double jeopardy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02351369952217024,"score_gpt":0.2630656685474667,"score_spread":0.23955196902529646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255951148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6232857,0.01763321,0.00096764805,0.10890202,0.0009526016,0.00004834933,0.00017873524,0.000035783676,0.24799596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97425056,0.0028608565,0.00015746134,0.0026449708,0.000076718075,0.00001564576,0.000017159484,0.000019759787,0.019956728],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957819,0.0012135294,0.0000739387,0.00020715965,0.0008167469,0.0019067405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99399877,0.0027940846,0.0005945824,0.00047029508,0.0009445026,0.0011977295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041071977,0.00034144637,0.00046554845,0.0020580618,0.029807642,0.006937886,0.001940349,0.0032483356,0.008365203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017559731,0.0004027942,0.00020829024,0.0023424113,0.024298754,0.0036472587,0.005450637,0.005271098,0.00026015195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084580875,0.00007972257,0.018248864,0.000092125236,0.0000140660595,0.0018059915,0.5724935,0.00009108286,0.00029289233,0.31743282,0.034055304,0.05530905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020521962,0.000031799893,0.03538135,0.00068236643,0.000023560315,0.00070789695,0.71655893,0.00011135344,0.00034409092,0.017605854,0.22849223,0.00004002165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82385963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9033267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17614037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023277273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049731888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35435534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257655993","doi":"10.1111/caje.12004","title":"Teen families, welfare transfers, and the minimum wage: evidence from Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Earnings; Economics; Minimum wage; Pooling; Demographic economics; Fertility; Hourly wage; Wage; Labour economics; Demography; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.0653097004570313,"score_gpt":0.1833487101418758,"score_spread":0.11803900968484449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257655993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9495361,0.013677523,0.0002475264,0.0050897924,0.00007184185,0.000053840013,0.009354493,0.000015773612,0.021953257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906446,0.0060299993,0.000104677216,0.00027197515,0.000016307276,0.000010661944,0.0016130223,0.0000054392563,0.0013034516],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978411,0.00025860287,0.000097332144,0.00016594029,0.0009176193,0.00071942725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891642,0.0018420079,0.002567269,0.0003304507,0.0045793494,0.0015166717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019694327,0.00021131117,0.0005279044,0.0028899,0.0027412872,0.0017467595,0.001061976,0.0003929169,0.0035871188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009149607,0.00023465765,0.0006690642,0.007761429,0.0011148518,0.00037004513,0.001465288,0.0008703928,0.000118710515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015850326,0.000063954874,0.96464247,0.00017778309,0.00020992766,0.00026018728,0.0022380168,0.00048142017,0.000046568024,0.0021879678,0.005228933,0.02430423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016832128,0.000018610868,0.98989373,0.00025671476,0.00009796148,0.000049121943,0.003251889,0.00022583404,0.000057843095,0.00018782208,0.0059288125,0.000014871396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99674857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99770516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025194967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025194967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05502842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1828031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258566072","doi":"10.5937/ejae12-8672","title":"The effect of incentive return-to-work policies on single-parent families: A comparative approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Journal of Applied Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Incentive; Solidarity; Economics; Labour economics; Work (physics); Welfare; Income Support; Welfare reform; Tax credit; Single mothers; Inequality; Working poor; Public economics; Economic growth; Poverty; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.054022995123081924,"score_gpt":0.27035530437536676,"score_spread":0.21633230925228483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258566072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9272071,0.0074848537,0.0008350085,0.0024384528,0.00008779473,0.00013312213,0.00058880285,0.00001287155,0.061212007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99474746,0.0026740662,0.00027291957,0.00019658315,0.000041169103,0.00008499749,0.00011248724,0.0000035633425,0.0018667412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954366,0.003434182,0.00005269347,0.00012866165,0.00027551118,0.0006722891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993321,0.0047834776,0.00079348887,0.00020396223,0.00061344815,0.00028450286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044038347,0.00042294755,0.0009010491,0.0023376646,0.0015327432,0.0018048511,0.0010407725,0.0013821411,0.009458976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0090701245,0.0001704297,0.000879372,0.0023503464,0.0014802057,0.0015483527,0.0014911444,0.0007207374,0.000229295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068295547,0.0072027957,0.16222599,0.0030300198,0.0020580746,0.004466906,0.018663004,0.03360316,0.0024580066,0.54221135,0.012687934,0.20456323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013780298,0.0125748385,0.700192,0.0033143207,0.002364905,0.0015104396,0.1191769,0.013516537,0.004219286,0.057684347,0.08389873,0.00016958748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018996976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019346429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018996976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046841474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00234626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037772834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259077194","doi":"","title":"State Tax Revenue Decline Accelerates","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Tax revenue; Quarter (Canadian coin); State (computer science); Business; Economics; Monetary economics; Finance; Public economics; Geography","score_opus":0.02060985414830356,"score_gpt":0.27629339133304903,"score_spread":0.25568353718474546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259077194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15633436,0.023653528,0.001473135,0.35783505,0.013523914,0.00004504297,0.0035808962,0.0007498947,0.44280416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79431546,0.03020814,0.0005422949,0.026851488,0.0071590645,0.00004164787,0.0039889333,0.00023878425,0.13665427],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990355,0.00010430096,0.000042521282,0.00009077965,0.0004834506,0.00024350907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962184,0.00049163995,0.00067483814,0.00011365413,0.0022065307,0.00029506188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011452624,0.00021884592,0.00025243594,0.0014907789,0.0021700107,0.0047400296,0.0003991735,0.0014005183,0.012774886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005646086,0.00015539509,0.00036285096,0.0028635252,0.00065870996,0.002765111,0.0010241225,0.0024862364,0.0031603542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060133465,0.00007073382,0.027375985,0.00022298569,0.000021105187,0.00025635603,0.0016503799,0.00028634127,0.00017970607,0.03239056,0.81873524,0.11875055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009022588,0.00005281037,0.051822945,0.00035252725,0.0000239345,0.00029333401,0.0030875828,0.00042406959,0.0003426859,0.0037520463,0.93982226,0.000016804315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034729917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0566197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034729917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035563647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005157663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06905556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259966171","doi":"","title":"Personal Income Tax Revenue Rebounds as Sales Tax Falters","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Tax revenue; Revenue; State income tax; Economics; Ad valorem tax; Sales tax; Personal income; Value-added tax; Gross income; Business; Personal income tax; Income tax; Tax reform; Labour economics; Monetary economics; Public economics; Finance; Macroeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.01058772534912373,"score_gpt":0.280952966519962,"score_spread":0.27036524117083827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259966171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65216357,0.0031509975,0.001231705,0.15855168,0.0040842965,0.000046061243,0.012920986,0.00090744265,0.16694327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92438084,0.0035300148,0.00045813588,0.013190532,0.0022134944,0.00003817247,0.0067519904,0.00024031322,0.049196552],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924266,0.00006908117,0.000052383504,0.000088327266,0.00027170696,0.00027585757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99443495,0.0009156083,0.0020692195,0.0002336486,0.0017173045,0.00062928867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013023993,0.00029309271,0.00036238742,0.0021956635,0.0016144025,0.0045734756,0.0007116575,0.0017320605,0.015780058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007483956,0.00021716641,0.0004262434,0.0031464144,0.0007265855,0.003243778,0.001191482,0.0033265199,0.0068690395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005575338,0.00021437483,0.1883709,0.00015692675,0.000067612535,0.0006639212,0.0035941778,0.0014558329,0.000888848,0.031416595,0.6199863,0.15262696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064883134,0.00031429954,0.4457344,0.00025811128,0.000061566185,0.00073552626,0.013709973,0.0033018463,0.0030364387,0.0122333355,0.5204536,0.00009597678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017966108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017835995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017966108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022281564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017890409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05278957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261210879","doi":"","title":"Femme Fiscale Brings Women’s Voices to the Legislature","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015778674911277962,"score_gpt":0.2541532039539447,"score_spread":0.23837452904266673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261210879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19756731,0.014655825,0.0006047085,0.38789272,0.0036638498,0.000042991236,0.00029853618,0.000053271397,0.39522085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.840531,0.0033208292,0.00032548365,0.029947873,0.00050667155,0.00003387383,0.000065450615,0.000056197594,0.12521249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946631,0.0011450187,0.000055103228,0.00030607055,0.0010979199,0.002732794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628747,0.0016328081,0.00019867824,0.00013235252,0.00082002353,0.00092875084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005064014,0.00035780726,0.00047964865,0.0020796321,0.05462673,0.01248232,0.0013095245,0.0061963745,0.0124935815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010500773,0.00043690566,0.00035684288,0.0023010855,0.015103673,0.0041334755,0.0042374847,0.0070056,0.0005241605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011884919,0.0000631281,0.009395261,0.00013237045,0.000017574146,0.00048299186,0.29284173,0.00009411479,0.0009543774,0.43610704,0.21311197,0.046680667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009058928,0.000019398372,0.013826126,0.00020548634,0.000012081527,0.00006822941,0.19562091,0.00004323426,0.00036859966,0.006380163,0.7834107,0.000036046422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95101076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9826103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06154492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06154492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.097683996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4465418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263971084","doi":"","title":"The ‘Final Say’ Is Not the Last Word. Gendered Patterns, Perceptions, and Processes in Household Decision Making Among Chinese Immigrant Couples in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Research in Antropology & Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Immigration; Power (physics); Perception; Demographic economics; Inequality; Social psychology; Sociology; Qualitative property; Distribution (mathematics); Consumption (sociology); Psychology; Gender studies; Economics; Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.09185220090461267,"score_gpt":0.42098594861531,"score_spread":0.32913374771069737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263971084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974776,0.00019811626,0.00004688741,0.00028354305,0.000004270843,0.0000068804275,0.0000291589,0.0000011774797,0.0019523449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992181,0.00013220025,0.00004138127,0.00003355974,7.2722656e-7,0.0000032837916,0.000017667042,9.0408963e-7,0.00055206317],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906725,0.00018993417,0.00004105226,0.000094729876,0.00020154647,0.00040550024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887794,0.00023793301,0.000207301,0.000039424238,0.00027835602,0.00035895748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001509992,0.0002525821,0.00026310785,0.0008927223,0.009215568,0.002510373,0.0006771397,0.00037448865,0.002081419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026750688,0.00018843541,0.00025245882,0.0015881599,0.003937767,0.00078244315,0.0014970647,0.00058715395,0.0000891916],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016977232,0.000057584686,0.33715543,0.00007855048,0.00002356708,0.0008124605,0.6324496,0.000197815,0.0016357399,0.0048414697,0.001049401,0.021528626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035201977,0.000030740146,0.2276567,0.000053808915,0.000010475338,0.0000809559,0.767973,0.0002817515,0.00022623678,0.00036084367,0.0032928437,0.000029119567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9582855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9766515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04171449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020254819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021980489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14695972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264065638","doi":"","title":"Who Benefited from the Deduction-Inclusion Regime for Taxing Child Support?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Economics; Tax deduction; Disadvantaged; Tax rate; Income tax; Child support; Payment; Inclusion (mineral); Government (linguistics); State income tax; Public economics; Gross income; Labour economics; Monetary economics; Tax reform; Finance; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.008719981079635664,"score_gpt":0.2519119577759093,"score_spread":0.24319197669627363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264065638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9588793,0.0016972275,0.00045883676,0.01643783,0.00012138349,0.00003672947,0.00019181725,0.000014334484,0.022162624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950976,0.00049574126,0.00014102402,0.0012779027,0.0000673305,0.000012077428,0.000030579144,0.0000033142653,0.002874356],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979366,0.0005131724,0.000043031985,0.00012791585,0.00033450552,0.0010447843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807763,0.00040119886,0.00058345596,0.00012459952,0.00031263582,0.0005004439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021627974,0.00009166123,0.00035559808,0.0006590331,0.0016815757,0.0017473941,0.00044377527,0.0008895429,0.004815999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006743706,0.00017517841,0.0002840052,0.0008490915,0.0015119079,0.0023795539,0.00091592787,0.0011523191,0.0005666818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028921562,0.000652858,0.5342687,0.00012367316,0.00009760511,0.0018564027,0.016925013,0.00029850903,0.0019566566,0.10381235,0.021276167,0.31844294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015576938,0.0006273245,0.7478104,0.0006109346,0.00014763963,0.007413595,0.06800214,0.0016575676,0.0026365696,0.028543998,0.14229597,0.000098126584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022050004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044904273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022050004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025671904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034800377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04384327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267745215","doi":"10.5539/res.v8n1p102","title":"Added Worker Effect Revisited: The “Aubry’s Law” in France as a Natural Experiment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spillover effect; Unemployment; Economics; Natural experiment; Wage; Labour economics; Work (physics); Compensation (psychology); Labour supply; Demographic economics; Work hours; Government (linguistics); Working hours; Psychology; Economic growth; Social psychology","score_opus":0.025278133453493494,"score_gpt":0.34001040459154525,"score_spread":0.31473227113805174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267745215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89619565,0.0019178751,0.03004086,0.0068023866,0.0015115953,0.0020037056,0.0021339243,0.00041702786,0.058977034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589054,0.0006988153,0.01569839,0.003467813,0.0003597843,0.003528475,0.00043569662,0.000072201336,0.016833516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98905236,0.008181117,0.00023954714,0.0010658243,0.0009266694,0.0005344222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97040087,0.022472933,0.0029766206,0.0027761725,0.00076978013,0.0006037402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011855014,0.00073293486,0.0015086929,0.00063375296,0.0015326724,0.001911632,0.0013548255,0.0026283495,0.010306427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015642907,0.00024138672,0.0015953181,0.00065123226,0.003023885,0.001083486,0.001179361,0.0029674186,0.00079735316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.042683095,0.031215487,0.04926015,0.0047419434,0.0030511047,0.0034124854,0.0074733617,0.04344378,0.034929086,0.58315617,0.059357207,0.13727604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03746935,0.073537834,0.113918185,0.0009993657,0.0035394877,0.00068838947,0.0036733982,0.103511065,0.022962075,0.41166645,0.22730936,0.00072502944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0151623245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00987639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0151623245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002048475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018434111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0626961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268536221","doi":"10.1111/iere.12160","title":"MARRIAGE, MARKETS, AND MONEY: A COASIAN THEORY OF HOUSEHOLD FORMATION","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Coase theorem; Economics; Inflation tax; Cash; Inflation (cosmology); Monetary economics; Labour economics; Transaction cost; Microeconomics; Monetary policy; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.028948162726548023,"score_gpt":0.2805173889517391,"score_spread":0.25156922622519107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268536221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16394128,0.04784478,0.18718493,0.024625093,0.00043692224,0.00015412441,0.00022343168,0.00008404923,0.5755054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94353133,0.011141645,0.011747829,0.00056239386,0.0002614644,0.000102862956,0.000039285896,0.00001682988,0.03259627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995993,0.00019278399,0.000012571971,0.00006373744,0.00007795034,0.00005369924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999537,0.00017924306,0.00009793275,0.0000408625,0.00006971745,0.00007533057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008946391,0.00031875595,0.00040582655,0.0011280414,0.001482455,0.001822993,0.000760108,0.0010189629,0.009055593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017753815,0.00014629283,0.0003965557,0.001483396,0.0039456487,0.004331469,0.0016248712,0.0007720503,0.00064679823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006878579,0.000009035515,0.0006635167,0.000030407771,0.000004468368,0.000043907537,0.0007585016,0.0006655386,0.00003373141,0.9891209,0.00068656326,0.007976556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010045449,0.00002795157,0.0019183508,0.00010460763,0.000008752685,0.00021188491,0.00103018,0.0038167592,0.00006379393,0.9505071,0.042290855,0.000009713346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037623886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026216405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009055593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016980084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011855524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030293941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270281102","doi":"","title":"How your sexual orientation can affect how much you earn","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Sexual orientation; Affect (linguistics); Census; Demographic economics; Wage; Labour economics; Gender studies; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Economics; Demography; Population; Finance","score_opus":0.09013613266401185,"score_gpt":0.38516622825706986,"score_spread":0.29503009559305804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270281102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90187675,0.0027598196,0.00066238834,0.00662623,0.00035621063,0.00002128101,0.00067752594,0.000016673559,0.087003216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819172,0.0019243298,0.00026882096,0.0010070078,0.000053537533,0.000009888026,0.00013428806,0.000010541481,0.014674377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927884,0.00033462816,0.00003119073,0.000039675386,0.00017046956,0.00014514301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973194,0.00082531065,0.000625436,0.00014621539,0.00040300356,0.00068056973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008648324,0.00014621613,0.0001798753,0.00045534826,0.00091008906,0.0023415224,0.0001253,0.00038706945,0.01113425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061582252,0.00009968819,0.00023242585,0.00044952388,0.0009725499,0.00059801294,0.0007231372,0.0006980002,0.0023329507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004093521,0.00042284813,0.790134,0.00012385772,0.00025374818,0.00071358687,0.011830507,0.00018063831,0.0029455903,0.011648276,0.019519653,0.16181791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002047721,0.00026013327,0.89191985,0.00020659465,0.000095353775,0.0013431677,0.030404689,0.00021991004,0.0011511447,0.009197006,0.06509347,0.00008812158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049597216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010217124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01113425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003772443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030277934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037247717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272163742","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1107246","title":"An Efficient Nonparametric Test of the Collective Household Model","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nonparametric statistics; Test (biology); Econometrics; Computer science; Economics; Geology","score_opus":0.020829743255302853,"score_gpt":0.25635620374736395,"score_spread":0.2355264604920611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272163742","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36542267,0.0001161481,0.6221267,0.0008167085,0.00008928531,0.00020790285,0.001032818,0.0006731557,0.009514725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9339643,0.0000356034,0.06210357,0.00009895778,0.00008620869,0.0002187841,0.0008204413,0.000074589334,0.002597505],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98819846,0.008629748,0.00026999548,0.0012319027,0.0011809563,0.00048898277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9036365,0.08069652,0.0029944223,0.01017117,0.0016108529,0.0008903996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014611893,0.00048597253,0.0013121595,0.0013252326,0.0010659868,0.0014707973,0.002041928,0.0016488472,0.014742639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08009346,0.00032089243,0.0008886225,0.0014724118,0.0019960743,0.0022798835,0.0024110489,0.0013306538,0.0011260541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002201372,0.0010802349,0.12574588,0.00029628092,0.0009943281,0.0009180661,0.0010326143,0.13277407,0.005908131,0.3108578,0.013825024,0.40436623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029115414,0.0008361299,0.04720815,0.000047690108,0.000099840945,0.0004115654,0.000730744,0.76397645,0.002440701,0.17937508,0.0045125205,0.000069990434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019396481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023807033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014742639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009223841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026045574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07727605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274773060","doi":"10.14288/1.0073804","title":"Gender identity and in/fertility","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Identity (music); Gender studies; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Population; Art","score_opus":0.017076893671027476,"score_gpt":0.2131218344707712,"score_spread":0.19604494079974374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274773060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5337779,0.008346087,0.0011635071,0.012445315,0.00045586887,0.000030001616,0.00010238466,0.000027150536,0.44365188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98027873,0.0020375925,0.000207805,0.00066325266,0.000040972533,0.0000055046435,0.00001913848,0.000010494866,0.016736414],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987276,0.0005299845,0.000021665815,0.00006445152,0.0002459796,0.00041026683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994331,0.00009108797,0.00010611286,0.000038872087,0.00011682949,0.00021386768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013804244,0.000191533,0.0001836229,0.000559405,0.0065750233,0.0039004472,0.00047714903,0.00040312938,0.0069333045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013840081,0.00009124768,0.00015823965,0.00052698766,0.008168265,0.0008858779,0.002045396,0.00096501,0.00037261588],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012733584,0.000095677315,0.084932566,0.00012774207,0.0000263432,0.0013840251,0.54518837,0.0001640591,0.0016727663,0.22577044,0.014738338,0.12577242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011177339,0.00006855581,0.113420025,0.0004405717,0.00003155007,0.0011905219,0.44985616,0.00016271148,0.0008297893,0.017639164,0.4163098,0.000040044848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34348163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38922143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34348163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071305577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077302507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6829647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274970812","doi":"","title":"寻找阿基米德的“杠杆”——“出生季度”是个弱工具变量吗?","year":2010,"lang":"zh","type":"article","venue":"经济学(季刊)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Instrumental variable; Variable (mathematics); Sample (material); Population; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Demography; Economics; Geography; Mathematics; Sociology","score_opus":0.018288531670175516,"score_gpt":0.28000400568307143,"score_spread":0.2617154740128959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274970812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.961819,0.0013030913,0.016729662,0.00431019,0.00018761515,0.00004705042,0.0030546184,0.00007711204,0.012471718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931156,0.00026414066,0.0030992918,0.00019470474,0.00006232676,0.000029787807,0.0006875929,0.0000084184385,0.0025382421],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994412,0.00024004307,0.00003680681,0.0001381527,0.00007036642,0.00007336017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973304,0.0013190397,0.0008876536,0.00018254481,0.0002109412,0.00006944728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001791819,0.00011247838,0.00028244604,0.00040102986,0.00028760606,0.0006326649,0.00031989973,0.00018537274,0.0041393368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067335367,0.000092683076,0.00025689692,0.00087018835,0.00048018098,0.00055037,0.0003127926,0.00044324299,0.00070381514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021541922,0.00006975933,0.85184,0.00015327416,0.00022555038,0.00015719158,0.0019571783,0.0010846627,0.001058414,0.02908853,0.006463532,0.10768648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037239664,0.00030215047,0.89120936,0.00011924831,0.00025492292,0.00035739646,0.0043629915,0.005254483,0.004894373,0.024951622,0.06818443,0.00007174834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052360366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054065953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052360366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043706186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005067016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01384747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276122061","doi":"","title":"Why Women Would Gain From a Guaranteed Livable Income","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.02085389119058049,"score_gpt":0.2600448096313693,"score_spread":0.2391909184407888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276122061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3495756,0.002970668,0.00070218043,0.30298796,0.0009695206,0.00013219914,0.00083434395,0.000060280505,0.34176722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95703185,0.00060596364,0.00033147374,0.013218226,0.00006644228,0.000034171757,0.000088216686,0.00001618568,0.028607452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942914,0.00058230566,0.000065563894,0.00018600764,0.00094563386,0.0039290814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958905,0.00059123937,0.00023458361,0.00020469411,0.0011357118,0.0019432212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003392886,0.00020320172,0.0003679728,0.0008236313,0.009595721,0.004098444,0.0010797612,0.0032977797,0.012541777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012726542,0.00020142451,0.00039272048,0.0010155796,0.0063556065,0.0024647228,0.0027549302,0.003359882,0.0008355949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047207583,0.00018296712,0.08438196,0.00020858429,0.00007049297,0.00074205326,0.030657016,0.0004022932,0.001008975,0.61535054,0.14911528,0.11740776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017218982,0.00020217396,0.2153434,0.0008029759,0.000079895304,0.00044466462,0.096458405,0.0005224655,0.00067473896,0.071526416,0.61365336,0.00011936196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7996809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92438734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20031911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0334928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054415215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4029976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277417327","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2734726","title":"Female Employment and Violence in the Household: Evidence from the Latin American Demographic and Health Surveys","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Demographic economics; Occupational safety and health; Geography; Demography; Environmental health; Medicine; Political science; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.041602920153472306,"score_gpt":0.30544349523917824,"score_spread":0.2638405750857059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277417327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991459,0.0026886172,0.00012439523,0.0012353975,0.00002815237,0.000008834829,0.0012954444,0.0000017502882,0.0031584718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967693,0.0018607399,0.00004047078,0.00024035644,0.000033525546,0.000012717098,0.00061179296,0.000002039287,0.00042901468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819034,0.0010075528,0.0001167617,0.00014690548,0.00019060796,0.00034785015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938107,0.0019597723,0.0026946731,0.00031934472,0.0005782865,0.0006373512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002282954,0.00023162589,0.00033921204,0.0014323246,0.00090320583,0.0010759142,0.0006918108,0.00074539334,0.0028773875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008372524,0.00034930237,0.00048594634,0.0034291428,0.00078851,0.0010762357,0.0015010772,0.00078415463,0.00026832445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002904642,0.00003276183,0.99569196,0.000026948608,0.000095339135,0.000029028915,0.000896444,0.000020534704,0.000016716342,0.00010984828,0.00032834636,0.0027231607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026897712,0.000021786638,0.9934651,0.00007663896,0.000034252447,0.000042098978,0.0053726314,0.000042224106,0.000017024375,0.000078795696,0.0008432988,0.0000033668182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054994036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09462644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054994036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042332913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006427379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10934788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277632001","doi":"10.5539/ass.v12n3p24","title":"Factors Influencing the Labor Force Participation of Married Women in the United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Life expectancy; Economics; Demographic economics; Unemployment rate; Unemployment; Labour economics; Demography; Sociology; Economic growth; Population","score_opus":0.0306785493777813,"score_gpt":0.31371291548735447,"score_spread":0.28303436610957317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277632001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992687,0.00012482496,0.000014279385,0.00006262919,0.0000035575197,0.000001660657,0.00016279034,7.3938287e-7,0.00036085525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992731,0.000120353725,0.000013341452,0.000023256036,0.0000034131726,0.0000023383768,0.00020994766,5.990222e-7,0.0003537094],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998424,0.000042379208,0.0000155365,0.000021711876,0.000022592241,0.000055286662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999488,0.000089010464,0.00021028379,0.000016971735,0.00005234083,0.00014340588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003940233,0.000109815075,0.00014067127,0.0006296848,0.00043906877,0.0004559459,0.00017452952,0.00023116458,0.0015381975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009586302,0.00013168628,0.00022470926,0.00063355337,0.00019077133,0.00019338532,0.00034010544,0.00032107913,0.00022353826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018251809,0.000019822317,0.99762815,0.0000035561325,0.000016788365,0.000033300803,0.00039521386,0.00003240653,0.000095720236,0.00001990142,0.00010987993,0.0016269452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.760209e-7,0.000012460675,0.9987931,0.0000041728763,0.000004765869,0.000020493948,0.00085610594,0.00003860397,0.000022392198,0.000008648487,0.00023730574,0.0000011358895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061137993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15949841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061137993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032470506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031304767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12156427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278683968","doi":"10.15609/annaeconstat2009.117-118.379","title":"Gender Role Attitudes and Women's Labor Market Participation: Opting-Out, AIDS and the President Appeal of Housewifery","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Economics and Statistics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumental variable; Context (archaeology); Appeal; Educational attainment; Shock (circulatory); Demographic economics; Economics; Pill; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Economic growth; Medicine; Geography; Law; Econometrics","score_opus":0.07331196034390307,"score_gpt":0.3261212260496027,"score_spread":0.2528092657056996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278683968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925645,0.0006334544,0.00004988852,0.0027758724,0.000029205696,0.000004641072,0.000083786275,0.0000011354557,0.0038574766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998357,0.0003370769,0.000014686521,0.000190746,0.000038209604,0.0000034458337,0.000034944263,9.0288506e-7,0.0010228677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993767,0.00029271242,0.000015148422,0.000036753438,0.00007608731,0.0002025621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99616003,0.0015622752,0.0014213545,0.000081023914,0.00019453483,0.0005807748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020371897,0.00013411326,0.00018835315,0.0005611717,0.0012058234,0.0014204376,0.00034089782,0.0006696714,0.0034120441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063306554,0.00009102095,0.00014814384,0.00088062725,0.0010480672,0.00078090164,0.00075625087,0.00077062356,0.00025587174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021088781,0.0003065986,0.9537814,0.000028865452,0.00003548822,0.0001656716,0.011701256,0.00019664875,0.00014303676,0.006759721,0.004245572,0.02242484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012380001,0.00009083073,0.9646694,0.00005925294,0.000024424548,0.000053411495,0.026855005,0.00045874168,0.00017466402,0.0013821681,0.00621126,0.000008359188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03790087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0849102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03790087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010872129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010512798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07536054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280760314","doi":"","title":"A Married Mom and Dad Really Do Matter: New Evidence from Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.017104590392476887,"score_gpt":0.2530223999140064,"score_spread":0.2359178095215295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280760314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7485387,0.08080459,0.0006511486,0.07653207,0.0008559007,0.00013428577,0.013264203,0.000024720553,0.079194404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9543329,0.03082152,0.00044841663,0.007911537,0.00013893936,0.000042536954,0.0019216686,0.000046785124,0.0043357275],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99380624,0.0009951998,0.0003972704,0.00085892563,0.0023191469,0.0016232693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9633972,0.008317786,0.005213566,0.0013753449,0.016679864,0.005016265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061777853,0.00043104187,0.0014085069,0.0022437966,0.010861305,0.005133702,0.002785871,0.0014402994,0.00896749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030477218,0.00063250086,0.0009840375,0.007702525,0.0042118724,0.0020393499,0.0027492284,0.0034286163,0.00040805442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000524232,0.00013884593,0.8431503,0.001121044,0.000787722,0.00057431066,0.033251856,0.00018827897,0.00011318311,0.010012523,0.048595924,0.061541736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010957048,0.000042956974,0.89304745,0.0028710668,0.0008751093,0.00014371923,0.059309155,0.00022432502,0.00014801546,0.0019779438,0.04114594,0.000104701154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99738497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99902725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051854234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051854234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11549822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3762306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281194592","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401912018","title":"Globalizing Concern for Women’s Human Rights: The Failure of the American Model. By Diana G. Zoelle. New York: St. Martin’s, 2000. 169p. $49.95.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Human rights; Panacea (medicine); Convention; Multinational corporation; Democracy; Ideology; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.03752125067306954,"score_gpt":0.3422662927023365,"score_spread":0.30474504202926694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281194592","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029096502,0.74060076,0.00024743256,0.2173271,0.0044689137,0.000009717198,0.00006618321,0.00003494428,0.03695399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018670365,0.7433911,0.0009547536,0.08422221,0.0068162763,0.000099272285,0.00013719145,0.00013244693,0.14557636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932563,0.00023426628,0.000023465254,0.000099687335,0.00021558026,0.00010138764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922574,0.0003843545,0.00008436065,0.000033427437,0.00012493476,0.00014713193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00151136,0.0014231638,0.00054669584,0.0015503768,0.0022180902,0.003973432,0.0009812219,0.004165224,0.022927485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024278897,0.00063852774,0.0003263107,0.0024705564,0.0053590396,0.007919885,0.0027215222,0.00536582,0.008360311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010389912,0.000012215089,0.00012937862,0.00015330662,0.0000049435293,0.000022305885,0.0007611851,0.0000291006,0.0000358762,0.025647243,0.93336034,0.03983376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006534067,0.000006569914,0.000795645,0.0005659044,0.0000039227457,0.000055304787,0.0008607249,0.000028147962,0.000020275878,0.014585205,0.9830651,0.0000066032685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030604685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07974871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030604685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040504774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004027389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07670009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282311145","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2015-049","title":"The Differential Impact of Universal Child Benefits on the Labour Supply of Married and Single Mothers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Labour supply; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Economics; Single mothers; Differential effects; Child care; Labour economics; Psychology; Medicine; Developmental psychology; Nursing","score_opus":0.01544939762235638,"score_gpt":0.23979354872919786,"score_spread":0.22434415110684147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282311145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935428,0.00040327394,0.000029458966,0.00040613828,0.0000068166014,0.000007302176,0.00035426713,0.0000017343858,0.0052481615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978661,0.00023192384,0.00003157741,0.00006413085,0.000006593223,0.000005998128,0.00019410625,0.0000011385208,0.001598492],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989195,0.00019277364,0.000022731958,0.00006207597,0.00020589748,0.00059708947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980768,0.0007275653,0.00044695317,0.000069325615,0.00020055939,0.00047864977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006713565,0.000126355,0.00039870822,0.0006404778,0.0006500265,0.00059246144,0.0004011086,0.00042049063,0.007829526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00431736,0.00011636255,0.0004281417,0.00084889575,0.00059104915,0.00026638617,0.0010017486,0.000470082,0.00022974271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013896266,0.00037419898,0.93717957,0.00012575206,0.00021500072,0.000661747,0.0027856696,0.0019993007,0.002330647,0.004848262,0.0011851115,0.046905123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019754883,0.00018332512,0.9955123,0.000029086134,0.000049325008,0.00004583609,0.001941509,0.00035235015,0.00020867774,0.0002776042,0.001373981,0.000006076834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4267318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6228751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5732682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032037117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032383604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8484959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283625973","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2015-054","title":"Effects of the 2001 Extension of Paid Parental Leave Provisions on Birth Seasonality in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Seasonality; Demography; Geography; Demographic economics; Economics; Ecology; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.017366415115919864,"score_gpt":0.2531139881592007,"score_spread":0.23574757304328087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283625973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97669035,0.0014639369,0.00021047513,0.005717751,0.00007083887,0.00003731771,0.0076247077,0.0000496849,0.008134992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992211,0.0007488164,0.00016000212,0.0003476919,0.000014264737,0.000011039282,0.0017727535,0.000013484063,0.004720959],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987048,0.000116075375,0.00004466509,0.00014407703,0.00034135944,0.00064904476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938694,0.00093769334,0.0010524822,0.00024056695,0.0019869881,0.0019128787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011339713,0.00028147854,0.00047880522,0.0010077212,0.0022967828,0.0016718275,0.00143006,0.0006827,0.004815135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007096627,0.0002421114,0.0006772523,0.001867678,0.000809744,0.00029458196,0.0012304268,0.0012203691,0.00021202986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012275567,0.00019679511,0.921823,0.00012774087,0.0002517809,0.00048050133,0.0030743843,0.006970585,0.0011963869,0.004251843,0.015197594,0.045201894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017717706,0.000041608128,0.9910288,0.00004656682,0.000039244023,0.00001930858,0.0022051996,0.0010672063,0.00019058849,0.00010774475,0.005214215,0.000021788328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06600366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06600366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06709969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47889233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285211598","doi":"","title":"Before and After Reform: How Have Families on Welfare Changed?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Welfare; Welfare reform; Quarter (Canadian coin); Cash; Social policy; Economics; Aid to Families with Dependent Children; Labour economics; Term (time); Work (physics); Demographic economics; Economic growth; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.017586663266978476,"score_gpt":0.25798871359511705,"score_spread":0.24040205032813858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285211598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8940048,0.004264226,0.00013775793,0.08338743,0.000487788,0.000023892027,0.00067082676,0.000012121858,0.017011162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909382,0.0012778174,0.000042776403,0.004107408,0.00015740588,0.000017025992,0.00017253117,0.000010004502,0.0032768857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962565,0.0011623264,0.00010322168,0.0002533517,0.00029010148,0.0019345431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962823,0.0008399491,0.0008976528,0.00016433952,0.0006995255,0.0011162433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004054425,0.0001591181,0.00037904293,0.0010413111,0.004167459,0.004251564,0.0007752251,0.0025038535,0.009396579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013176228,0.00017652905,0.00066290365,0.0015091765,0.0027292052,0.005810344,0.0021831193,0.002055926,0.00037286954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095753715,0.00068876863,0.5546983,0.00037840064,0.0002559232,0.0018033884,0.12102727,0.0005329774,0.0006035026,0.04759369,0.03986435,0.23159584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005273251,0.00026396144,0.6601776,0.00057907245,0.00009057491,0.00040974957,0.22114801,0.00017320129,0.00054034404,0.0054033897,0.1110804,0.00008089234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09775159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11057018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09775159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008093635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048428327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1943652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288692974","doi":"10.1111/1467-8268.12169","title":"The Threat of Domestic Violence and Women Empowerment: The Case of West Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Development Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Empowerment; Residence; Wife; Economic growth; Political science; Geography; Development economics; Socioeconomics; Demographic economics; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Economics; Environmental health; Medicine","score_opus":0.017997504709732496,"score_gpt":0.28102317613347727,"score_spread":0.2630256714237448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288692974","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35890338,0.5881058,0.0026010538,0.019533183,0.00024141645,0.00006203606,0.000051012154,0.0000036157837,0.030498514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68531084,0.3116806,0.0008376503,0.0006742437,0.00010683358,0.00003770027,0.000011685415,0.0000025633124,0.001337899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981584,0.0014502888,0.000039772964,0.000039560062,0.00009609873,0.00021583195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980861,0.0015523275,0.00022971009,0.000024917832,0.000070869304,0.00003602926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028420233,0.0003443786,0.0005473141,0.0009440792,0.001236525,0.0016917025,0.00045697624,0.0012136318,0.0011097393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038090602,0.0002432825,0.00045857555,0.0021348798,0.0025115565,0.0025650288,0.0015327368,0.0008576282,0.000066869834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025194738,0.00019618295,0.052010175,0.009433839,0.00041335114,0.015082993,0.09083132,0.006935717,0.000771532,0.49042523,0.0063864905,0.3272612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083720064,0.0007051813,0.104124665,0.028643187,0.00049859675,0.013650982,0.329414,0.0054258415,0.0014524328,0.12491086,0.39096013,0.0001303977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011785504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017953804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011785504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013690379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020816103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023433805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291154622","doi":"","title":"Universal Childcare and Longer-Run Effects on Parental Health and Behaviors: Evidence from a Canadian Universal Child Care Program","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology; Depression (economics); Child care; Panel survey; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Demographic economics; Nursing; Economics","score_opus":0.028867207973096626,"score_gpt":0.3342661005509002,"score_spread":0.3053988925778036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291154622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96981907,0.00972912,0.0005766251,0.003873084,0.00007637894,0.00022428647,0.0041026864,0.000043772565,0.011555065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918785,0.0033016405,0.00041831142,0.0006415605,0.000029295661,0.00008028936,0.0011404533,0.000009223935,0.0025006642],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969344,0.00073052826,0.000083722254,0.0003717511,0.00082547334,0.001054158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99239117,0.0020452368,0.0018550288,0.00057472085,0.0017959146,0.0013380124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031417843,0.00037921747,0.0006984863,0.00076147926,0.0022427314,0.0011596704,0.0014384914,0.0007781865,0.004434529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009691309,0.000177845,0.00075060327,0.0024067743,0.0014461909,0.00052270887,0.00111306,0.0009547139,0.00016285888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021822874,0.0021562316,0.82294935,0.00091778557,0.0010987252,0.00028087036,0.0026054613,0.0024988335,0.0007151219,0.004967079,0.008571783,0.15105656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012416343,0.00031043892,0.9924166,0.00020499925,0.00032524255,0.000020819445,0.0008278715,0.0005624143,0.00022061396,0.00020535832,0.004761832,0.00001963985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9903424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99249107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039214294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039214294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04363557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28452098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291408308","doi":"10.4000/bifea.7651","title":"Género y apropiación de la perspectiva de inversión social en Bolivia: el sistema de los Bonos","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin de l’Institut français d’études andines","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016855988738357384,"score_gpt":0.2885761911493698,"score_spread":0.2717202024110124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291408308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80784786,0.0035251235,0.0021258544,0.026026452,0.00012942603,0.000062496634,0.00019563167,0.000028146938,0.16005896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99023366,0.0008798357,0.0002784769,0.0005429756,0.000023287048,0.000026558604,0.000031373856,0.000009160953,0.007974671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800164,0.00093876984,0.000034628494,0.00012987985,0.00024296496,0.0006521343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874395,0.0003712737,0.00034920507,0.000104352686,0.00015416094,0.00027706526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025040002,0.00033610966,0.00025749454,0.002148162,0.0054653287,0.0075326543,0.00067557686,0.0010459562,0.008081068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034662767,0.0002676846,0.0002159173,0.0027165262,0.014128489,0.0036242933,0.007374725,0.0018853965,0.00032875285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016589291,0.000107232896,0.07691702,0.00024235791,0.000039170125,0.00068794313,0.23377053,0.0004499522,0.0013976652,0.61569816,0.005017639,0.06550637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063944855,0.00017223439,0.11780536,0.0011584954,0.000069558126,0.00046834393,0.45023927,0.000570613,0.0010920287,0.11513655,0.31314757,0.000076034725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08525467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11131286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08525467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011639711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008702178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16951686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295495194","doi":"10.1515/bejeap-2015-0059","title":"The Impact of Female Education on Teenage Fertility: Evidence from Turkey","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Demography; Total fertility rate; Compulsory education; Instrumental variable; Population; Margin (machine learning); Variation (astronomy); Demographic economics; Socioeconomics; Geography; Family planning; Economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Research methodology; Econometrics","score_opus":0.06319394215972397,"score_gpt":0.38504129859518854,"score_spread":0.3218473564354646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295495194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883796,0.0052238246,0.00016332993,0.0006059656,0.000025137193,0.0000107335,0.0011110555,0.0000056236054,0.0044747195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977731,0.0015425069,0.000039029142,0.000055724777,0.000012082768,0.0000027915712,0.0003675961,0.0000012342111,0.000205795],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921215,0.0003312287,0.000051013147,0.0001221826,0.0001249538,0.00015842891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948061,0.0027786838,0.0016247723,0.00017047039,0.00044690658,0.00017314004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014424723,0.00028496372,0.00047272167,0.0010148683,0.00025707064,0.0005562209,0.0005154268,0.00037908973,0.003544787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030315407,0.00015054847,0.0007383132,0.0013891204,0.0005696076,0.00023781412,0.0005524997,0.00046204962,0.00023103193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005985428,0.0002543067,0.9620102,0.00047105193,0.00067630335,0.0009491865,0.0005275627,0.0016626061,0.00021936702,0.0017961027,0.001283719,0.029551102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003809329,0.00024093363,0.9945133,0.00013142718,0.00036204932,0.00017074915,0.0010180934,0.0005683166,0.00025804344,0.0002302072,0.002459218,0.0000095517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051701445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03845989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051701445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008543777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006999683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102801025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296467323","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12433","title":"EFFECTS OF WELFARE REFORM ON WOMEN'S VOTING PARTICIPATION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Welfare reform; Welfare; Economics; Incentive; Demographic economics; Turnout; Population; Presidential system; Democracy; Public economics; Labour economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Politics; Demography; Market economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.032354383536765556,"score_gpt":0.31581000280238075,"score_spread":0.2834556192656152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296467323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955819,0.00032921083,0.000111789894,0.00064280175,0.000021516636,0.000017956472,0.00036114966,0.0000044874832,0.0029291466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876666,0.00011289026,0.000028508852,0.00007128032,0.000018717863,0.000008951496,0.00016027584,0.0000010439169,0.0008316913],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854976,0.0007089395,0.00006232885,0.00014021744,0.00012744473,0.00041121582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950117,0.0014589634,0.0026673449,0.00018600682,0.0002552477,0.00042081505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018728522,0.00018197388,0.0003048434,0.00060451025,0.0005781427,0.00072431477,0.00028616216,0.00037699172,0.0047647916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075817313,0.00010210338,0.0005533055,0.00081378175,0.0005099951,0.0004352582,0.000929528,0.00057628675,0.00033416867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005290597,0.00030644838,0.97402996,0.000039014005,0.00011994708,0.00008467498,0.0009183116,0.00047184582,0.0004895597,0.0010192111,0.00082246965,0.021169493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081005655,0.00019037457,0.99745506,0.000012122885,0.000039411912,0.0000130292965,0.0006937903,0.0001598495,0.0002040661,0.00011211842,0.0011094675,0.0000025354498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018290302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030614452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018290302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010050596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006002145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036367714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296600898","doi":"","title":"Liberalization of Birth Control and the Unmarried Share of Births. Evidence from Single Mothers in the Marriage Market","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Liberalization; Quarter (Canadian coin); Marriage market; Fertility; Abortion; Economics; Birth control; Demographic economics; Pill; Matching (statistics); Family planning; Population; Demography; Medicine; Research methodology; Pregnancy; Geography; Sociology; Biology; Market economy","score_opus":0.03762609019644704,"score_gpt":0.2802943872344406,"score_spread":0.24266829703799359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296600898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905742,0.0014964719,0.0005976723,0.0025767186,0.000011725293,0.0000058770183,0.00028702704,0.000014235352,0.004436173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99914575,0.0003233557,0.000049456856,0.000056510165,0.0000095327,9.892574e-7,0.000056377747,0.0000011494514,0.00035684067],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997315,0.000085107196,0.000015746464,0.000054824653,0.000036242447,0.00007664182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99445087,0.001272131,0.0031152521,0.00031475083,0.00016775026,0.00067929534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009782312,0.00010072995,0.00024445995,0.000584721,0.0004006735,0.0010890197,0.00033547645,0.00061370025,0.004499392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058288947,0.00013729546,0.0003142273,0.0007755624,0.0010798342,0.0008342746,0.00065421103,0.0006225529,0.00018866014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005149433,0.00024692624,0.88825244,0.00010918554,0.00018689112,0.0005802916,0.0014480579,0.008562238,0.0017529416,0.057109002,0.0014437399,0.039793286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056467572,0.0001362846,0.95252395,0.00005205029,0.00009718536,0.00026734552,0.0018822874,0.011770392,0.0010432518,0.028210077,0.0039371355,0.000023561377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014408938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013187536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014408938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009317771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060186174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028650165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297910813","doi":"10.1108/ijse-07-2014-0134","title":"Religiosity and female labour market attainment in Canada: the Protestant exception","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Sheridan College; Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Protestantism; Redress; Context (archaeology); Originality; Educational attainment; Ideology; Sociology; Demographic economics; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Geography; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.013158465006710874,"score_gpt":0.25013089398917193,"score_spread":0.23697242898246107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297910813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99027526,0.0010162813,0.00007715109,0.0014817164,0.000017213028,0.000011507056,0.00087922177,0.000004854903,0.0062367865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975025,0.0005167517,0.000071508344,0.00008771133,0.0000049789332,0.0000028825723,0.00037168319,0.0000026080047,0.0014393899],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993229,0.000050402203,0.000022255585,0.00006889795,0.00025455476,0.00028096655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973073,0.00023182822,0.00054056675,0.00010019344,0.0009254205,0.00089464086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007765608,0.00019821331,0.0003436535,0.0011932879,0.0035824159,0.0013755535,0.00068997504,0.00027868568,0.0037092965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002571587,0.00013345563,0.0003736451,0.0033161745,0.0010888816,0.00026807436,0.0011006093,0.00080142,0.00018992972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008045986,0.000050228628,0.97219515,0.00004622585,0.000046307654,0.00022327698,0.0036848474,0.0002062355,0.00013009789,0.0017608064,0.0023072273,0.019269152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003648665,0.000012873161,0.99249953,0.000060229766,0.000014524859,0.000036476264,0.0042176615,0.00021662781,0.000056701192,0.00011470714,0.002757875,0.000008988277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99456984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02177306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02177306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034596615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15797538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297979647","doi":"10.1057/9780230232822_13","title":"The Shaping of Motherhood through Social Investment in Children: Examples from Canada and Mexico","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Politics; Hegemony; Investment (military); Political science; State (computer science); Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02722882450662773,"score_gpt":0.2439832411661459,"score_spread":0.21675441665951817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297979647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8610968,0.010748938,0.0005850104,0.01680591,0.00010955683,0.00006306374,0.00056343287,0.000018920366,0.110008344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96334976,0.0122401025,0.001016265,0.0010667702,0.000024068147,0.000055235847,0.0001893679,0.000026974334,0.022031356],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987638,0.00027701634,0.000019065956,0.00010949853,0.00015358333,0.00067701034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894494,0.0003250234,0.00010185859,0.000035133675,0.00028207302,0.0003109516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013121951,0.00043137916,0.00050474325,0.0020289682,0.02852684,0.0042644828,0.0015409661,0.0014138906,0.0034526587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019083794,0.00022895636,0.00032160882,0.004916066,0.007684684,0.0011592611,0.005163641,0.0024623862,0.00013840922],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008895618,0.000055821045,0.04507874,0.00017335807,0.000033871547,0.0032650896,0.8440311,0.00021262,0.0003504567,0.06395207,0.008803446,0.033954497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015484751,0.00002601476,0.07686866,0.00043881874,0.0000433915,0.0004991646,0.751689,0.0001262179,0.00026654056,0.0022867962,0.16770348,0.00003646457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97728604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99321365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06610312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06610312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04642855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47961396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W229896902","doi":"","title":"T he impact of child care costs and availability on mothers' labour supply","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Poverty; Child care; Labour economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Business; Economic growth; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.028158361435329314,"score_gpt":0.344597170756556,"score_spread":0.3164388093212267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W229896902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8651646,0.05810733,0.0019839925,0.014251171,0.00021545147,0.000025402067,0.0024921345,0.000014042273,0.057745975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683316,0.0251437,0.00033378816,0.00044969065,0.00027204546,0.00002303101,0.0003731643,0.00001334828,0.0050597023],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914384,0.0002816297,0.000037067977,0.000084664585,0.0002532279,0.00019958655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963936,0.0022530523,0.00084637315,0.000071285256,0.00023652283,0.00019907972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007059641,0.00018203566,0.00028313868,0.00088493264,0.0004497375,0.0013827533,0.00044308053,0.00044769337,0.010780479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038164223,0.0001487396,0.00033232948,0.0013717231,0.0005565685,0.0008353107,0.0011470868,0.000458541,0.0005130378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038636383,0.00020567363,0.68631387,0.0017088866,0.00042406737,0.0022208071,0.004834945,0.004296603,0.0016182808,0.056921076,0.008663793,0.23240565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018125635,0.00013982762,0.91695964,0.0013569326,0.00014517242,0.00089412514,0.009094116,0.0011688613,0.00069595734,0.015896702,0.05359425,0.000036262452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012241817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01276132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012241817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013888287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007886972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036064327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300049803","doi":"10.14288/1.0055583","title":"The women-in-development efficiency approach : a case study of programming income generation in a Chinese village","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rural development; Economic growth; Business; Economics; Geography; Agriculture","score_opus":0.011654914993429476,"score_gpt":0.21623830131184205,"score_spread":0.20458338631841258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300049803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99353504,0.00007318779,0.0004522222,0.0007896306,0.000009957843,0.00012777306,0.00001236865,0.000008752471,0.0049910047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922387,0.00029337718,0.000951773,0.00024257589,0.0000088290535,0.00011442507,0.000017611126,0.000009148154,0.006123571],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874336,0.00057102134,0.000025367413,0.0000758753,0.00012377324,0.00046060985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911743,0.00026008222,0.00008504243,0.000046089466,0.000064879205,0.00042640243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019854323,0.00068051805,0.00035543897,0.0012479121,0.014063456,0.0016525225,0.0017754904,0.0013246313,0.0024951904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001824389,0.0003921672,0.00028254167,0.0011859355,0.0043009375,0.0014988184,0.003697022,0.0015999615,0.00020427149],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006784063,0.0008413789,0.027136238,0.00017202065,0.000011615496,0.027547797,0.90953946,0.0004051003,0.0019733147,0.007889286,0.0016903649,0.022725616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020129515,0.00040541138,0.012569952,0.000076066084,0.000013844779,0.0025331425,0.9658107,0.00071579736,0.0008388735,0.0005888045,0.0164088,0.000018490495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027332297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06434468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027332297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048894593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059880903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054346442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301131661","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2029591","title":"Le Financement des Services de Garde des Enfants: Effets sur le Travail, le Revenu des Familles, et les Finances Publiques (Public Funding of Child Care: Effects on Family Incomes, Female Labor Market Participation and Provincial and Federal Public Finances)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Child care; Humanities; Economics; Welfare economics; Nursing; Medicine; Art","score_opus":0.01573480066720864,"score_gpt":0.26523956726854914,"score_spread":0.2495047666013405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301131661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945176,0.0009936414,0.000021817916,0.0018868954,0.000011890544,0.0000061086507,0.0002706474,0.0000032110763,0.0022880828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754924,0.00052034995,0.000039832896,0.000088201465,0.000015547681,0.000008891031,0.00009429449,0.0000016854258,0.0016819624],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877745,0.00048758587,0.000031156414,0.00005674516,0.00013258515,0.0005144096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931397,0.002780004,0.0016740188,0.000111874,0.00039823083,0.0018960546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020588473,0.00021405403,0.00031464186,0.0005656891,0.00087835075,0.00115228,0.0007774634,0.0009663486,0.008453078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010375454,0.00015126461,0.00059437257,0.00077433145,0.000639682,0.0006426849,0.0012573021,0.0009885781,0.00026033432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014096706,0.0007955472,0.94051707,0.00012408833,0.00013867804,0.00039616937,0.005174518,0.00046067752,0.0004958743,0.00228596,0.0023575705,0.045844097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048004043,0.00044935045,0.98935217,0.000093103095,0.000059442722,0.00013634216,0.006384588,0.0002351974,0.00019029419,0.00042436548,0.002619741,0.000007510012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12624785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22632618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8737521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030790458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004836233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25102603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305299259","doi":"10.7202/1043294ar","title":"L’égalité, l’indépendance et l’union de fait : le choix de l’union de fait et du mariage au Québec et en Ontario de 1986 à 2011","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010339031313469702,"score_gpt":0.24316413480161775,"score_spread":0.23282510348814806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305299259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881138,0.0010727831,0.00025359303,0.0022525864,0.000037375663,0.0000288328,0.0007234984,0.0000061792325,0.0075113857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97969097,0.00063368096,0.00021664117,0.00015102128,0.000011373356,0.000029737994,0.0003042494,0.000008385475,0.018954076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857557,0.00024590464,0.000040833085,0.00017607631,0.0003895115,0.00057214475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99574405,0.00057220494,0.0007261805,0.00017033781,0.0015505389,0.0012366774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018357806,0.00023242763,0.00041219217,0.0012335171,0.005514209,0.00201792,0.0011047838,0.00050717226,0.0052835187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045456802,0.00033515357,0.00038112164,0.0027662236,0.0033194718,0.000846982,0.0021425835,0.0011192935,0.0003344619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027028378,0.00006312442,0.8738555,0.000106609914,0.0001027648,0.0002626324,0.0758261,0.0005970063,0.00045154028,0.0056332597,0.0050016483,0.037829533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006201698,0.000037741127,0.9424973,0.00009130762,0.000023666224,0.000020249649,0.039970897,0.00019378016,0.00012911545,0.00012631385,0.01687916,0.000024293671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99848276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052101903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052101903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044452067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37802756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305384592","doi":"10.14288/1.0084605","title":"Creating an educational tool : the implication of a new infant feeding policy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Infant feeding; Breastfeeding; Medicine; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.02207139888568404,"score_gpt":0.23711888053674277,"score_spread":0.21504748165105872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305384592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5470369,0.0010096944,0.083832905,0.13542368,0.0022092825,0.0050727087,0.00021651265,0.0019929835,0.22320524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6901876,0.0010108694,0.2653402,0.008612887,0.00027156566,0.0027400793,0.0001598118,0.00017621864,0.031500787],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98272175,0.013472804,0.0005374752,0.00044863005,0.0018319996,0.000987326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96411204,0.024563937,0.0015799525,0.0017683487,0.0035402353,0.0044354075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030834246,0.00042812905,0.0002700684,0.0014404942,0.0041860645,0.0061329515,0.0022130336,0.0031082134,0.009597551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040629063,0.0003423755,0.00039730646,0.00075645087,0.0032001156,0.008531426,0.0045697046,0.0026878691,0.0011929862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020987305,0.011038691,0.02792878,0.0017920717,0.00002071562,0.0021152426,0.096642435,0.000996149,0.0037453705,0.057917275,0.038985353,0.75860804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040929564,0.004222668,0.03835435,0.005114403,0.00010870273,0.003001924,0.2551555,0.009573602,0.009721977,0.032746036,0.6412404,0.00035107174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031118428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070086326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030834246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025572756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0114127165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16306901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2311247204","doi":"10.1177/0192513x15623588","title":"Who Is in Charge of Family Finances in the Russian Two-Earner Households?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Demographic economics; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Poverty; Inequality; Welfare; Power (physics); Economic growth; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.08289022387858046,"score_gpt":0.3515927506502222,"score_spread":0.26870252677164175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2311247204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99868387,0.00013964798,0.00001728391,0.0003414182,0.0000035595565,0.0000018387058,0.000023959905,3.7247216e-7,0.0007881688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955064,0.0001783003,0.000010222957,0.000050732153,0.0000027230624,0.0000020746907,0.00001409227,2.334773e-7,0.00019102688],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995553,0.00015628448,0.000017703484,0.000044988043,0.000039478597,0.00018622198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994242,0.0001328532,0.0002424473,0.000016118522,0.000041016905,0.00014345555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073568855,0.00009398094,0.00019395296,0.0005637095,0.0017914992,0.0010447277,0.00022357576,0.00040556974,0.0017012528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015900068,0.00013244853,0.00010946703,0.00064033654,0.0009940933,0.0015743363,0.0008514791,0.00061253854,0.00011710992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000661357,0.00009444967,0.80038255,0.00003708182,0.000014461318,0.000640589,0.17922793,0.000052902953,0.0003311441,0.0023047286,0.0010761201,0.015771884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003390623,0.00007229753,0.61642826,0.00006256275,0.000009318965,0.00043789635,0.37803864,0.00012256671,0.00011093844,0.00040360645,0.0042983685,0.000012130459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034415886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049380325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034415886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009649235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090023084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06843114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314849528","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2012.03.742","title":"PGI15 The Economic Burden of Unmet Treatment Needs in Medicaid Patients with Chronic Constipation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Value in Health","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Constipation; Fecal impaction; Medicaid; Medical prescription; Chronic constipation; Adverse effect; Emergency medicine; Health care; Intensive care medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.03085724378491901,"score_gpt":0.29887209967741946,"score_spread":0.26801485589250046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314849528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889922,0.00056830957,0.000017767195,0.004467623,0.000036039168,0.000014935633,0.0010834051,0.000001718926,0.0048179426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985221,0.00031603608,0.00004621557,0.00030974433,0.000043529515,0.00001394882,0.00042800765,0.0000014102151,0.00031900694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914145,0.0002743351,0.00009417652,0.000036055393,0.00015220648,0.00030169496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968389,0.0005391296,0.0013769415,0.000038581864,0.00021003408,0.0009965131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005832571,0.00009810548,0.00019639675,0.0007922608,0.0009109817,0.0009583877,0.00023734204,0.0005130121,0.0061913407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006697944,0.00014215465,0.0005061419,0.0014530553,0.00037933973,0.0006743624,0.0013828699,0.0008264443,0.00017377613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021054057,0.00012753734,0.98130816,0.00003938365,0.00007564743,0.00030406506,0.00039394057,0.00015872184,0.00006446711,0.0005280048,0.0028433187,0.013946062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002126646,0.00008094135,0.9949921,0.000100805395,0.00003310738,0.00033255175,0.0019822028,0.0003218321,0.000022387927,0.00024730756,0.0018569245,0.000008602274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023866152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04942612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023866152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015617105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025812197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047454476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315521518","doi":"10.1177/084387140301500271","title":"Book Review: Set Adrift: Fishing Families","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Maritime History","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Fishing; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.019487371575347516,"score_gpt":0.27553781539242983,"score_spread":0.2560504438170823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315521518","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034998122,0.54742265,0.00049737,0.14314416,0.22020395,0.00009303396,0.00048432205,0.00019779692,0.08760676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031817458,0.27205724,0.00050733524,0.05242394,0.11851197,0.00012838998,0.00044656446,0.00015333653,0.5525894],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994479,0.000112426664,0.00004427593,0.00007790137,0.00027308727,0.000044408036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661034,0.0013310451,0.00017863813,0.00009829311,0.0013288921,0.00045277484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010319076,0.0012420204,0.0018621722,0.0029039711,0.0014527853,0.002570033,0.0016157227,0.004262153,0.08871677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060167788,0.0004783734,0.000540918,0.0033106806,0.0008242417,0.0029868705,0.0017452628,0.0031053808,0.04689656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005243964,0.000002763053,0.000018971152,0.00009482529,0.0000015152227,0.000017174189,0.000007830484,0.000009502494,0.0000088075085,0.0001514993,0.98179066,0.017891161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065583145,0.000008361152,0.00021791579,0.00039577542,0.0000053155086,0.000116785166,0.000039018836,0.000015488578,0.000014875658,0.0002952131,0.9988795,0.0000051291804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005409193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018242024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08871677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015570112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018449078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2967872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315952069","doi":"10.1016/s0037-6337(11)70527-7","title":"Practice Costs in U.S. Quadruple Those in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Skin & Allergy News","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.0307490898735801,"score_gpt":0.2789253991223543,"score_spread":0.2481763092487742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315952069","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25404608,0.023333624,0.0005259373,0.53648525,0.008430909,0.00017964955,0.009943052,0.0004129326,0.16664258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7347386,0.025302166,0.0011624431,0.07238108,0.0020465222,0.00010502263,0.0031872618,0.00014858157,0.16092837],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844044,0.000086182146,0.000038651626,0.000056814697,0.00060988194,0.0007680481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930957,0.00030876254,0.00029733413,0.000052560128,0.0016102691,0.0046352427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046683446,0.00020994875,0.00026763356,0.00076671824,0.0040596863,0.0019145709,0.0008761215,0.002173674,0.02364815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035790761,0.00022002491,0.00048669727,0.0016705372,0.0006860086,0.0006876925,0.0008316122,0.0021672496,0.001500312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020352309,0.00015554852,0.093414515,0.00023295438,0.00007085862,0.00085787807,0.001154187,0.00041347175,0.0006110373,0.0061119096,0.74458694,0.15218726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012699142,0.00015032216,0.35799867,0.0006610644,0.00008209495,0.00075468275,0.012546856,0.0012691927,0.00036531786,0.001332668,0.6246349,0.00007724222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98150474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03643857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03643857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09016177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2643816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318032586","doi":"10.2307/3504790","title":"10.2307/3504790","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Social justice; Equal opportunity; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Politics; Law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.010832453624672117,"score_gpt":0.22466384077990872,"score_spread":0.2138313871552366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318032586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030471446,0.00036137644,0.00032604873,0.00028591196,0.00033999304,0.00004937612,0.0007963964,0.0005881891,0.99694794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010376329,0.00034948732,0.00038732708,0.00037050925,0.00009204485,0.000031492214,0.0009848009,0.000309789,0.9964371],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947566,0.00004713099,0.000042810818,0.00014353791,0.00020000788,0.00009083012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801755,0.0004662904,0.00007633631,0.00033693752,0.00048195952,0.00062088005],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008198887,0.0016474514,0.0012049088,0.0021539335,0.0017806168,0.0045354944,0.0018874893,0.002769194,0.98559046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001961176,0.0007803623,0.0007862134,0.0024019617,0.0016548006,0.005440441,0.00407801,0.0017003929,0.9852128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016307758,0.00016260424,0.00047756737,0.00042219128,0.000013840485,0.00017728175,0.00009823237,0.00013847635,0.0013304992,0.0053739934,0.5757413,0.415901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025232295,0.00003364863,0.0008798282,0.0002022969,0.0000060092207,0.00020521431,0.00014272552,0.000100766454,0.00019519374,0.0010588828,0.9971349,0.000015181806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00421892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004673433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014409542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010256794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012355667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02055335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318648079","doi":"10.1016/s1499-2671(11)52284-1","title":"Food taxes: Too easy a solution","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Diabetes","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Subsidy; Multidisciplinary approach; Public economics; Consumption (sociology); Perspective (graphical); Public health; Obesity; Population; Environmental health; Economics","score_opus":0.033881024810866994,"score_gpt":0.22782925963621808,"score_spread":0.1939482348253511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318648079","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077362577,0.007261972,0.0026206153,0.94603217,0.005139459,0.000019934192,0.00023285182,0.00009562565,0.030861108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33341834,0.020247478,0.00951775,0.52219063,0.015453097,0.00018331285,0.0004452801,0.0005573696,0.09798668],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963225,0.0011750775,0.00014657887,0.00052354444,0.0009955639,0.000836737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98334426,0.0061642886,0.0010296545,0.0009468184,0.004518349,0.0039965506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056786463,0.0009646087,0.0011302346,0.0018862727,0.0043526096,0.009964439,0.002193788,0.012846188,0.03800823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02112877,0.00043547677,0.00086758944,0.0013669546,0.007390484,0.0139841,0.0048584063,0.016160596,0.00491472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002207646,0.0003894225,0.0034972099,0.00035898897,0.00010722824,0.00041316656,0.001168097,0.0008271523,0.00042575432,0.3726571,0.5266925,0.09324267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015515866,0.00007682354,0.0030492183,0.0015590051,0.000073535404,0.00033622797,0.0073957746,0.00084093516,0.0003129545,0.35037115,0.6357106,0.00011875424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023999456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030690262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03800823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060378276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012631935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12715024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319170551","doi":"10.3406/oss.2010.1415","title":"L’évolution de la fécondité et la politique familiale québécoise","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Santé Société et Solidarité","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.01342617277025966,"score_gpt":0.34177207489683326,"score_spread":0.3283459021265736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319170551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97780377,0.0011123671,0.0003055833,0.0009828825,0.000011562304,0.000011067003,0.00025301683,0.0000062984373,0.019513516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99356824,0.00032978272,0.00013458033,0.000036870475,0.0000029764954,0.000004382147,0.00005990865,0.0000018928528,0.00586137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954,0.00010989706,0.000009900494,0.00007058523,0.00010898653,0.00016070141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866176,0.0002874019,0.0002352936,0.00008131769,0.00045683922,0.00027750974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009747229,0.00017566013,0.0002015665,0.0013687767,0.00260348,0.0012717539,0.0003803665,0.00030374996,0.0077385986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002127387,0.00010354767,0.00016669887,0.001583342,0.0016019676,0.00051119993,0.00071576255,0.0004231891,0.0002251985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014644176,0.000058524794,0.8347376,0.000074224954,0.00015471876,0.0005149797,0.052011155,0.00072646356,0.0025530215,0.023075178,0.0017267147,0.08422092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019792276,0.000026330374,0.9805321,0.000035528705,0.000015759362,0.000053126056,0.008001777,0.00016547542,0.00015923436,0.0004665466,0.010532216,0.000009917736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8879326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9429708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1120674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010736966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070869774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22545475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321349548","doi":"","title":"Has the potential for compensating poverty by womens employment growth been depleted","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Demographic economics; Economics; Poverty reduction; Poverty rate; Developing country; Percentage point; Development economics; Labour economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.024543582111299457,"score_gpt":0.26131597077089364,"score_spread":0.23677238865959419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321349548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9092292,0.006685687,0.0013674428,0.039063495,0.00036267936,0.000023509401,0.0019639235,0.00007096199,0.04123309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99196273,0.0025231715,0.0004037548,0.0016392275,0.00018085261,0.000015813459,0.00023042537,0.000015013002,0.0030290985],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990815,0.0003316446,0.000026835802,0.0000918072,0.00009898987,0.00036925368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976603,0.00043490768,0.00087812886,0.00033698304,0.00033882467,0.0003508048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018634718,0.00024679388,0.00043592817,0.0007253267,0.0005135995,0.0013560898,0.00039373882,0.00059449265,0.0053012287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058905967,0.00011735877,0.0006542098,0.0010737526,0.0009911441,0.0013519994,0.0015260247,0.00041164318,0.00084268366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008721624,0.00015386294,0.5235938,0.0010131072,0.00057747966,0.0012129375,0.0055224253,0.0030571285,0.0030188449,0.03707686,0.01637199,0.40752935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046966572,0.0004832549,0.82547,0.0010556758,0.0002693443,0.0006893452,0.011810239,0.0007294802,0.0020001782,0.0118086,0.14559034,0.00004663135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013258072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015070157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013258072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095131755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027698104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026361823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324522610","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdw010","title":"Towards a Micro-Founded Theory of Aggregate Labour Supply","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Labour supply; Aggregate supply; Salient; Wage; Margin (machine learning); Elasticity (physics); Labour economics; Price elasticity of supply; Shock (circulatory); Aggregate (composite); Supply side; Aggregate demand; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Price elasticity of demand","score_opus":0.04593733608731544,"score_gpt":0.32577241139761753,"score_spread":0.2798350753103021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324522610","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02867666,0.0012030177,0.9357062,0.004397716,0.00011276935,0.000095313895,0.0006277045,0.000082245046,0.02909849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8037593,0.0046405643,0.16835052,0.0011444347,0.0004529788,0.0009094656,0.0007480461,0.00013505579,0.019859603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990295,0.00047885635,0.000037632257,0.00020114236,0.00017231777,0.00008047815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980855,0.0010574828,0.00032904334,0.00016482062,0.00025761846,0.00010549444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001672263,0.0006130251,0.0010119019,0.0016388663,0.0006728323,0.0022353937,0.001841522,0.0014599062,0.00475697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004050433,0.0005766549,0.0011135384,0.0018694522,0.0016888896,0.0027648297,0.0016385494,0.0016485363,0.00086362887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074908803,0.000037275448,0.003045181,0.00008624816,0.00006360627,0.00009507324,0.0005150589,0.15319824,0.00023828466,0.8334799,0.0015488166,0.007684958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007649404,0.000022842089,0.0013948202,0.0000631663,0.000015388046,0.00004597502,0.0002146451,0.1868941,0.000056320696,0.8027208,0.008547142,0.00001715474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007654892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064352877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007654892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002212343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019473252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01605177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324622053","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2014.07.675","title":"MID LIFE MEN AND WOMEN’S RECOVERY WORK FOLLOWING A FIRST MI: ARE THEIR NEEDS BEING MET?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Providence Health Care; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Observational study; CLARITY; Nursing; Qualitative research; Family medicine; Health professionals; Secondary prevention; Health care; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.012649114751109677,"score_gpt":0.21219691978563426,"score_spread":0.19954780503452457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324622053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95482856,0.0048898356,0.000078845835,0.027483853,0.0004924586,0.000044574117,0.00020883471,0.0000047675126,0.011968456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948245,0.002159491,0.0000754353,0.0014085544,0.00009613264,0.000031546162,0.00007329732,0.0000033016408,0.0013277011],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783117,0.000589835,0.00007960821,0.00010383423,0.00025444204,0.0011411972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596786,0.0004955772,0.0006420202,0.000062616804,0.00047125146,0.0023607165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018676165,0.00025259124,0.00061836385,0.00096875365,0.004309144,0.0031492454,0.0008892069,0.0018670585,0.0044136173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008382672,0.0003720857,0.0005212312,0.0009525688,0.001531035,0.0022851285,0.0020585193,0.002355139,0.00041530273],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055374036,0.0008602023,0.67763156,0.000358924,0.00015711828,0.0016464717,0.21117933,0.00006659701,0.00051537546,0.0026194623,0.012009432,0.09240171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021777052,0.00019985833,0.511304,0.0003478999,0.000037057864,0.00039299403,0.4773735,0.000058362453,0.000043749536,0.0006304287,0.009551051,0.00003932675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062105883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16755468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062105883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025853133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063865683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123488784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331644085","doi":"10.1080/07053436.2006.10707714","title":"Gender Convergence and Life-course Differentiation in the Canadian Use of Time","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Life course approach; Unpaid work; Work (physics); Division of labour; Perspective (graphical); Convergence (economics); Sociology; Equity (law); Distribution (mathematics); Time-use survey; Demographic economics; Family life; Psychology; Gender studies; Economics; Social psychology; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.027390911380248913,"score_gpt":0.28251497343945864,"score_spread":0.25512406205920973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331644085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854801,0.0011995538,0.0001341841,0.0004348496,0.000015471847,0.000019052071,0.0011611957,0.000006961953,0.011548434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996896,0.0005103841,0.00017936494,0.000027121072,0.0000024446613,0.0000079596075,0.00052760186,0.000005734994,0.001843292],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855393,0.00009156954,0.000042148487,0.00021215888,0.00049058284,0.0006096826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809676,0.0002156308,0.0002909488,0.00007736974,0.0008565189,0.00046280833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014521995,0.00028318944,0.0004093487,0.005035686,0.005434505,0.002156003,0.001155729,0.00037116793,0.003510117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004815976,0.00023131867,0.00046256054,0.0076051247,0.0018794601,0.0007830592,0.0018703474,0.000617735,0.00017009852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002935795,0.00005133575,0.85118943,0.000077985365,0.00006473271,0.0002763556,0.08068796,0.00041021727,0.0008118228,0.012231967,0.002509571,0.051395055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028366692,0.000014566434,0.97867066,0.00003533918,0.000009109184,0.000038112354,0.016542738,0.00022062672,0.000079366866,0.00031326324,0.004053661,0.000019596886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99666625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04213466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04213466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030577986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30570978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W233315158","doi":"","title":"Session 4: New Policies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic policy review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare reform; Legislation; Entitlement (fair division); Aid to Families with Dependent Children; Incentive; Earnings; Receipt; Welfare; Social Security Act; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Federal funds; Block grant; Financial independence; Economics; Public administration; Public economics; Political science; Finance; Law; Accounting; Social security","score_opus":0.08659681573402572,"score_gpt":0.36428518927808773,"score_spread":0.277688373544062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W233315158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00085622224,0.004106656,0.0010573538,0.41584438,0.07615632,0.0003727183,0.0017480889,0.0005512314,0.49930698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0067494507,0.0018507767,0.0011322038,0.22541957,0.014632003,0.00071924616,0.0007340803,0.00041687835,0.74834585],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99112785,0.0017828401,0.00035613537,0.0013610264,0.0034764558,0.001895707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910329,0.0022623583,0.0003792931,0.0014643085,0.0027776856,0.0020833835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012815753,0.0012522527,0.0009772857,0.0013628347,0.00855395,0.016050648,0.0037164472,0.025123768,0.29286674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022550931,0.0007558575,0.0018265193,0.0015670253,0.0028853293,0.012461777,0.008733256,0.022561204,0.113202795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013945365,0.000033371205,0.00007141487,0.00005665616,0.0000030354893,0.00004603698,0.0001347665,0.000026334124,0.000072562056,0.01996664,0.9716593,0.0079159355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065117215,0.000004452469,0.00014680823,0.00006277465,0.0000013802186,0.000009707703,0.00012336536,0.000015215547,0.000029424269,0.0018161164,0.99777883,0.0000054605152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009524159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014945913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29286674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067247916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018832676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97973686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336713223","doi":"","title":"The United States in Comparative Perspective: Maternity and Parental Leave and Child Care Benefits Trends in Liberal Welfare States","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parental leave; Welfare state; Welfare; Political science; Welfare reform; Economic growth; Politics; Economics; Law; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.01789219897395435,"score_gpt":0.29928233232603135,"score_spread":0.281390133352077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336713223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.958835,0.00899637,0.00012681267,0.0038361733,0.00008532201,0.0000058674445,0.0010741682,0.000008132075,0.027032262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99398685,0.0038977829,0.000114220085,0.00042594096,0.000034672885,0.000007706375,0.0006325718,0.0000038764424,0.0008963869],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996189,0.00013133525,0.000027356893,0.000031872558,0.000059007096,0.00013153219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988084,0.00037489724,0.00039581617,0.000040690633,0.0002474317,0.00013285976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006274221,0.00008815712,0.00014877378,0.002987352,0.0010044259,0.0015052833,0.00018066131,0.00032814036,0.00280874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017213253,0.00007803993,0.00018723049,0.0062462143,0.00050960196,0.0009827052,0.0012049652,0.00057377794,0.00010912144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025057065,0.00010930525,0.8150969,0.00024739292,0.00010091638,0.00058155507,0.032484353,0.0005388239,0.00049556314,0.03165225,0.009093617,0.10934889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032715332,0.000043642875,0.94226646,0.00016897569,0.000034739027,0.00019245746,0.029642075,0.00010723339,0.00016770726,0.0005603142,0.026802598,0.000010613636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.081981495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18190253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081981495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016989367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091596757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16300857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339821599","doi":"","title":"The Cost of Raising Children","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Consumption (sociology); Cash; Economic cost; Opportunity cost; Economics; Public economics; Actuarial science; Cost–benefit analysis; Business; Political science; Engineering; Finance; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.009906372701641495,"score_gpt":0.26122943799901016,"score_spread":0.25132306529736864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339821599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1745613,0.021780308,0.042427927,0.02554947,0.0017698139,0.00029199745,0.009894991,0.00035559564,0.7233686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.814748,0.016679678,0.01535919,0.0021186497,0.00052898,0.00025077027,0.0038150316,0.00009563396,0.14640412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977264,0.0006769117,0.00011489388,0.00023389047,0.0009361867,0.00031181218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980475,0.0007893385,0.0003625779,0.00024500044,0.00038457738,0.00017117626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012544158,0.0004028839,0.00026388414,0.00094026234,0.000644581,0.0028012001,0.00065142405,0.0012536084,0.021918232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067592077,0.00025350563,0.0005677693,0.001124579,0.0010619244,0.0019208129,0.001352602,0.0011414693,0.0035892888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028208585,0.00008927621,0.025914807,0.0005701723,0.00015236354,0.0006945088,0.001126016,0.012477827,0.0018057101,0.51485544,0.04560068,0.39643103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029687837,0.00048252798,0.07687358,0.0012040954,0.00015858123,0.0049955347,0.0022258395,0.004801557,0.0022807003,0.11357914,0.7932486,0.00012022017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007665015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00647775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021918232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002913965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018155704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073323786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398700141","doi":"","title":"Stable Marriage with General Preferences - Extended Abstract.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02244730357105366,"score_gpt":0.2655929723225525,"score_spread":0.24314566875149887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398700141","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16648436,0.00062657107,0.78080475,0.0035835034,0.00014822537,0.00031966888,0.0022316198,0.00031480263,0.045486394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8328644,0.00054025295,0.14928377,0.0005101508,0.00011834441,0.00026802163,0.0013730582,0.000057644735,0.014984268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813473,0.00070740987,0.00009806901,0.0005489664,0.00029509177,0.00021573219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763525,0.0010687395,0.00035326826,0.00051316374,0.00016024229,0.0002693964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014347763,0.00052641035,0.00075723307,0.0005550028,0.001142824,0.0021536795,0.0015314318,0.0012416306,0.010514501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005065667,0.00044283987,0.001195761,0.0019115529,0.001374561,0.004195658,0.0021425937,0.0017160436,0.0010701724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035300892,0.00021068673,0.0017752707,0.00027074083,0.00006708064,0.00043528076,0.00044729214,0.105557814,0.0025608146,0.8284311,0.008294892,0.051596064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076405566,0.000096724965,0.00054516015,0.000034348228,0.000023025017,0.00030185003,0.00022701222,0.23102218,0.0011288291,0.7531636,0.013354489,0.00002639846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024411818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002874475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010514501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019030636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011755874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03517449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399738956","doi":"","title":"Common cent$ 4: balanced budgets, deficits, and the price of liberty.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Manitoba Health","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.02126336336589855,"score_gpt":0.2213677079946164,"score_spread":0.20010434462871785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399738956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17232226,0.013781001,0.005753548,0.09916275,0.0016577583,0.000068651905,0.0015272959,0.00013138038,0.7055953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96192586,0.0018657529,0.0010213119,0.0037395018,0.00034142178,0.00007213002,0.0002099787,0.00005076326,0.030773358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997589,0.00091647275,0.00009972273,0.00014454963,0.0007220206,0.0005282814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961904,0.0013997253,0.00084399554,0.00027624253,0.00070974627,0.0005797771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032873268,0.00029948412,0.0002953618,0.0013544462,0.001530165,0.005756149,0.00075973355,0.0022642564,0.024679832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021150569,0.00018616398,0.00019807009,0.0014265615,0.0039468836,0.00543871,0.0036555263,0.0027069591,0.00090347475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017444835,0.000016975933,0.0025881815,0.000050695664,0.000012547626,0.000043439206,0.00055128196,0.00035021585,0.00012910466,0.93719864,0.02958914,0.02929532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077316414,0.00019926089,0.028689887,0.0008357774,0.000057431425,0.0002535018,0.0056804353,0.0017637204,0.0008094531,0.6081295,0.35341007,0.000093610615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009626634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025660375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024679832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057317247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004432814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08256227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2401671146","doi":"10.55016/ojs/ajer.v61i4.55948","title":"Mere Equals: The Paradox of Educated Women in the Early Republic (2012) by Lucia McMahon","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Journal of Educational Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.07381095793063831,"score_gpt":0.4002339760662313,"score_spread":0.326423018135593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2401671146","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016754026,0.11533612,0.0005276193,0.6330832,0.004448877,0.000020767964,0.00008437177,0.000027291268,0.22971767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47473186,0.055989407,0.00071746955,0.22554198,0.004434828,0.00009239287,0.0000727008,0.00009898101,0.23832045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867487,0.00068814243,0.000016565731,0.00011043563,0.000245934,0.0002640201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936146,0.00032124508,0.00006538127,0.000025079733,0.00007740065,0.0001494306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001646451,0.00033600652,0.00020271773,0.0007442885,0.009370313,0.0055231196,0.0007944937,0.0028062635,0.005848347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024574576,0.00022962491,0.00017458662,0.00097358035,0.009656959,0.0063151666,0.0032396244,0.006228106,0.0010426268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039419032,0.000050552808,0.0008191844,0.00009298573,0.000005949057,0.00020989886,0.062522046,0.00004650619,0.00011535062,0.4589404,0.4408673,0.036290396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008185778,0.000011183811,0.0014086379,0.00035943894,0.0000028677375,0.00013004905,0.014732724,0.00003599936,0.00010273403,0.041213308,0.9419777,0.000017165714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04354437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08948105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04354437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007702598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052275844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086581826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2419073769","doi":"","title":"Heterogeneity in the Gender Wage Gap in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Glass ceiling; Salary; Earnings; Wage; Gender pay gap; Demographic economics; Distribution (mathematics); Marital status; Economics; Census; Labour economics; Full-time; Demography; Sociology; Population; Economic growth","score_opus":0.06985710722382353,"score_gpt":0.33927229807720233,"score_spread":0.2694151908533788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2419073769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88600177,0.008942438,0.0010211163,0.012769415,0.00039272464,0.00017027403,0.026500996,0.000115820294,0.06408545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987094,0.0013969832,0.00031456503,0.000844625,0.000026320178,0.000030320758,0.0034169022,0.000033428492,0.006842768],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943037,0.0002949687,0.00023589576,0.0007162127,0.002275887,0.0021733777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99371827,0.00079702976,0.00059987645,0.00029390852,0.002912468,0.0016783953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029166264,0.0003000677,0.001071322,0.0038955922,0.006747894,0.0030848153,0.002057259,0.0007219308,0.009073913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009423101,0.00031958087,0.00094551593,0.009257936,0.0015760282,0.0006443774,0.002202697,0.0010393278,0.0005775022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005216712,0.0001025854,0.7668572,0.000473313,0.00053226925,0.0009449254,0.01843306,0.0016537334,0.00070450833,0.029173808,0.08324395,0.09735894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033217315,0.000027109272,0.9573768,0.00029527038,0.00006977196,0.00009679748,0.0076761534,0.0011785123,0.00013268743,0.0018428969,0.031177575,0.000093306175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99845684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063042186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.063042186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09769774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4574052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463027398","doi":"10.1155/2016/8717265","title":"Distributive Implications of Fertility Changes in Latin America","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Population Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad Nacional de La Plata; International Development Research Centre; American Association of Equine Practitioners Foundation","keywords":"Fertility; Microdata (statistics); Latin Americans; Total fertility rate; Economics; Inequality; Poverty; Demographic economics; Income distribution; Per capita; Development economics; Demography; Population; Economic growth; Political science; Family planning; Research methodology; Sociology; Census","score_opus":0.11619357237109942,"score_gpt":0.45948580402320416,"score_spread":0.34329223165210476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2463027398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899888,0.001724476,0.00030359332,0.001011639,0.000012905452,0.000007593086,0.0010273142,0.00001124949,0.005912431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874854,0.00045050142,0.00009622821,0.00005289491,0.000012538913,0.0000047529666,0.00029795486,0.000003311776,0.00033325472],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963343,0.00016044462,0.000016732958,0.0000645248,0.000047124588,0.00007779229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878997,0.00030344762,0.0005800178,0.00009373084,0.00015735393,0.000075480086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011165816,0.0000672502,0.00016157338,0.0012270556,0.0004959371,0.00063812744,0.00025531635,0.0001526047,0.002487825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036445963,0.00009472348,0.0001938546,0.0018596842,0.00078358734,0.0002642663,0.0007474785,0.00023590741,0.000116197014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055769982,0.000023091303,0.9721387,0.00004288321,0.000068468056,0.000155407,0.0017741107,0.0011241735,0.0006279924,0.004081716,0.0006454924,0.019262236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037612015,0.000009209028,0.99482286,0.000017685947,0.00000856781,0.000042804382,0.0014990763,0.0002745696,0.000084576655,0.00088549824,0.0023470002,0.000004306432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032428775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04177797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032428775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010429701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005214603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06448001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463845097","doi":"10.1057/9781137569622_5","title":"The Great Transformation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Quarter (Canadian coin); Ringing; Meteorology; Geography; Engineering; Telecommunications; Political science; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.021926431622167262,"score_gpt":0.2523546503835725,"score_spread":0.23042821876140526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2463845097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004431602,0.009496342,0.0016531617,0.015731297,0.001562631,0.000016328962,0.000057288653,0.000061178886,0.9669902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25312433,0.0081822695,0.0016389068,0.0067666373,0.0010339634,0.00006141546,0.00007864123,0.00015687117,0.72895694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994228,0.00023457344,0.000009583542,0.00009804155,0.00013402454,0.00010101499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999742,0.00007044736,0.000015526704,0.000058978578,0.000039776995,0.0000733223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000761147,0.0004116475,0.00020061471,0.0004732467,0.0034439121,0.0034210943,0.00046331916,0.00079185853,0.018831661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011455609,0.00014236911,0.00024835722,0.00046959493,0.010564246,0.003480529,0.0030588214,0.0027868238,0.003608786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136874805,0.000014325695,0.00015751708,0.000032286778,0.0000021211686,0.000059446575,0.00973033,0.000054578253,0.0001236743,0.869348,0.0918824,0.028581737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002422029,0.0000054550355,0.00022599986,0.000064410204,8.2722386e-7,0.00007026212,0.002537891,0.000035059216,0.00006104362,0.056771226,0.94022286,0.000002588421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045027635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009023063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018831661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029912086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002537203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062998235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2471371869","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.011","title":"Bunching at the kink: Implications for spending responses to health insurance contracts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Economics; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Set (abstract data type); Object (grammar); Medicare Part D; Econometrics; Public economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Prescription drug; Medical prescription; Computer science","score_opus":0.08456020567782002,"score_gpt":0.3494598422167804,"score_spread":0.26489963653896037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2471371869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9076707,0.00021120925,0.0037758048,0.0067667253,0.000052091524,0.00006209049,0.0002923356,0.000024157765,0.08114491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99571854,0.00003220402,0.0001680814,0.00030217224,0.000010096499,0.000013468027,0.000027340584,0.000008020544,0.003720176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976133,0.0009349324,0.00007029904,0.00027700854,0.00026289898,0.0008415913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99069804,0.005248637,0.0012923126,0.0006498571,0.0006893261,0.0014217927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030303681,0.0002017611,0.0006867609,0.00066622527,0.0026184106,0.0039140168,0.0010002656,0.0023336334,0.03575329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022371758,0.00035976648,0.0003615999,0.00097478705,0.0021330907,0.0024148352,0.002901575,0.0018787025,0.00085757294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020622467,0.0011139308,0.29717046,0.00017692696,0.00018501742,0.0011539314,0.03590218,0.013986507,0.004432582,0.56158334,0.0141957,0.068037145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018528986,0.00033658126,0.40756935,0.00019550383,0.0001114892,0.00027594477,0.11105535,0.023935031,0.00087033235,0.4284566,0.026871989,0.00013651699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023599014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037684817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03575329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029783398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018822817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119606614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2471486258","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.36.1.139","title":"Impact of Background Variables on Attitudes about Family Life: A Comparative Analysis of Parents and Offspring in Israel","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Socialization; Religiosity; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Ethnic group; Family life; Family values; Social class; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Population; Demography; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.1394272233579216,"score_gpt":0.42720777477358235,"score_spread":0.2877805514156607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2471486258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998165,0.000044377583,0.000008741482,0.0000039667157,5.6378957e-7,0.000001002395,0.000015655933,1.5109815e-7,0.00010903051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997174,0.0000972412,0.000018656337,0.0000067707783,0.0000010915734,0.0000023648176,0.000053626973,4.3452428e-7,0.00010241033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999777,0.000092406146,0.000012805859,0.000027826494,0.000041705443,0.000048274633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929094,0.0002663581,0.00017160068,0.000030907733,0.00009780366,0.00014228055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070995186,0.00014982211,0.00019424502,0.000757097,0.00052189466,0.00055755186,0.00016761023,0.00020946746,0.001720598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013491985,0.00014633832,0.00026428094,0.00056658406,0.00035470544,0.0002656846,0.00036592947,0.00024532434,0.00017839798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005686329,0.00006998588,0.9926778,0.0000052393184,0.000022722303,0.00017083953,0.0040379255,0.000017927827,0.00015816114,0.00004112351,0.000025733332,0.0027157608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025102495,0.0001526057,0.9892238,0.000008965431,0.000013435982,0.00019324625,0.010074657,0.00005306741,0.000080355916,0.00002087812,0.00017373356,0.0000027449883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067913663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009157491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067913663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004214833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029068362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013503671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481678565","doi":"10.1057/9781403981356_1","title":"The War Against Children and the Shredding of the Social Contract","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Front (military); Welfare state; Political science; Strategist; Spanish Civil War; Politics; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Political economy; Public administration; Economic history; Law; Sociology; Economics; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.012824532051404701,"score_gpt":0.2453919187410101,"score_spread":0.2325673866896054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481678565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011447167,0.022280622,0.0011033263,0.079563804,0.0016270612,0.0000366146,0.00007710636,0.00003088406,0.88383335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42483145,0.022627406,0.0011248335,0.02830391,0.0015561164,0.00020211388,0.00005814211,0.00013727468,0.52115875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822456,0.0008963587,0.000028033284,0.00012813495,0.0003037384,0.00041917618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924916,0.0003985877,0.00007087195,0.000049617032,0.00007930534,0.00015240215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002012492,0.0005665457,0.00031150432,0.00086520816,0.010889742,0.0063466933,0.0006706914,0.0027240473,0.015162716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002651339,0.00023337669,0.0002369938,0.0010705701,0.022298388,0.004889304,0.003970727,0.0066382824,0.0017700891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072484777,0.000008861224,0.00019693101,0.000029354489,0.0000017222982,0.000118045915,0.024158323,0.000042924905,0.000026084455,0.9067597,0.059776634,0.008874261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004014367,0.00000833835,0.00024179861,0.00025626027,0.0000014646818,0.00010582558,0.012383379,0.000022749142,0.000066459506,0.052730437,0.934174,0.000005334168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026236795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036272768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026236795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0079643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006687468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057785273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482556755","doi":"10.1007/s11266-016-9762-8","title":"L. Mook, J. R. Whitman, J. Quarter, and A. Armstrong (eds): Understanding the Social Economy of the United States., University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Buffalo and London, 2015, pp. 390, paperback, $38.21.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Humanities; History; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01309378877149775,"score_gpt":0.24606220688254193,"score_spread":0.23296841811104418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482556755","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017648299,0.79360276,0.0026927553,0.026103206,0.0074699884,0.000043427564,0.00040484825,0.00013169661,0.16778657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013346162,0.6973972,0.0027695813,0.0031351221,0.002013409,0.000056467128,0.00045138414,0.00013370201,0.280697],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997652,0.0000500384,0.000012847151,0.000029937197,0.000112453454,0.000029468398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995834,0.00020609722,0.00004947267,0.000013126917,0.00008475064,0.00006317003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054353883,0.0010396196,0.0006209222,0.0012899818,0.001423056,0.004757001,0.0008131085,0.0014884222,0.031272687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010888843,0.00072025816,0.00047470944,0.0023995747,0.001562996,0.0065703965,0.000854633,0.0022038827,0.01459788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023503471,0.000027657885,0.000607409,0.00091206725,0.00001165712,0.00007264927,0.0017943097,0.00016165714,0.0001878137,0.030262055,0.79332864,0.17261054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026490065,0.000010648571,0.0018892442,0.0010030714,0.0000076018496,0.00014587758,0.0020456794,0.00008577615,0.00006563727,0.011934273,0.9827985,0.000010906919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01636445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04372305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031272687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023676914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035098167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104617536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2486408499","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v9n4p70","title":"Socioeconomic and Demographic Factors Affecting Labor Force Participation in Pakistan","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Demographic economics; Human resources; Economics; Socioeconomics; Labour economics; Population; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.013079188854002709,"score_gpt":0.29546450582172706,"score_spread":0.28238531696772434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2486408499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981255,0.000098460856,0.000018721927,0.00009587771,0.0000031842771,0.000008133384,0.00016933035,6.32044e-7,0.0014801822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995561,0.00014749744,0.00001637826,0.000013472595,0.000002753534,0.0000037684908,0.00007738708,2.8676044e-7,0.00018226674],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997147,0.000058996717,0.00002390257,0.000024027768,0.000062308136,0.00011595122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941707,0.00009375428,0.00025260792,0.000014309877,0.00006404753,0.0001582032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033422603,0.00010757039,0.000116014,0.00065445894,0.00073702633,0.00045680092,0.00013714132,0.00016348746,0.0035288285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010917432,0.00008311101,0.000160086,0.00086636766,0.00032227853,0.00026449267,0.0003477595,0.00021856818,0.00027389682],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026265187,0.00007376496,0.99394906,0.0000127400635,0.0000099361,0.00021844063,0.00077722943,0.00004319994,0.00012522713,0.00011434162,0.00020589266,0.004443905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010628527,0.000036063826,0.99711716,0.000011833747,0.0000025376337,0.00009522473,0.0022421272,0.000046325204,0.000018975017,0.00003366761,0.0003923619,0.0000026651958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028708827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040041264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028708827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003964947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067563937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057083428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493126541","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139696487.006","title":"The inclusive reality of time","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.019165066790031073,"score_gpt":0.23067923828738027,"score_spread":0.2115141714973492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493126541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065559875,0.013790673,0.01194941,0.008459536,0.00083699153,0.000021658745,0.000053758467,0.00004550663,0.9582864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67043614,0.015481773,0.007296855,0.0038223288,0.0013602445,0.00021663001,0.00011908738,0.0001784368,0.3010884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983303,0.0008071192,0.000049617473,0.00023609985,0.00035954075,0.00021731586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917847,0.00034751886,0.000066477216,0.00017627691,0.000114572955,0.00011664255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015557721,0.0005643113,0.00040964066,0.0010044293,0.0038969303,0.009866109,0.0007302385,0.0014241324,0.007833725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024040672,0.00026425422,0.00040469845,0.0011176617,0.02095768,0.011499116,0.005286527,0.0033086939,0.0014811236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022147387,0.0000019107542,0.00002852923,0.000009935468,0.0000011968741,0.000016299971,0.0024045946,0.00003827983,0.00003057134,0.99320084,0.0018579682,0.0024076407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034922875,0.000007168689,0.00013747484,0.00008723495,0.0000044521166,0.000072758565,0.0020657594,0.00014252406,0.000097075404,0.6926912,0.304685,0.000005939862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037792244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003613377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009866109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004098284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032755272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029735267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494986051","doi":"10.1108/jes-12-2014-0207","title":"Labour supply behaviour of married women in Toronto","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Wage; Labour supply; Econometrics; Originality; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.027467827271820785,"score_gpt":0.31512249954478877,"score_spread":0.287654672272968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494986051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998539,0.0001223944,0.000026053733,0.000092104434,0.0000025727234,0.0000049276186,0.0003940742,0.0000011256473,0.00081777165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982039,0.00018581546,0.000035910012,0.000028223536,0.0000016959543,0.000004347335,0.00025625006,8.248711e-7,0.0012831682],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998023,0.000023860568,0.000015138003,0.000026512187,0.00006531673,0.00006687842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959975,0.000037593923,0.00011915316,0.000016142276,0.00009193018,0.00013544122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001651818,0.00011044497,0.00016878756,0.0004980709,0.0012169477,0.000497222,0.00022885225,0.00016192596,0.0033025134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008356236,0.00015484855,0.00019773799,0.0012938591,0.00031638923,0.00019568627,0.000520121,0.00021086015,0.00026702342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050000963,0.000018969376,0.9752033,0.000047653546,0.000019550132,0.00034003862,0.016519174,0.00008914528,0.0007392786,0.00018037354,0.0006213479,0.006171296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001037319,0.0000258881,0.9856937,0.000018735052,0.0000052391115,0.000075867916,0.013039626,0.00007466406,0.000053726475,0.000020454305,0.0009859388,0.0000050868975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8915962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9488863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1084038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050067957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030282105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2180844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497256593","doi":"10.1108/s0147-912120140000040008","title":"The Changing Time use of U.S. Welfare Recipients between 1992 and 2005","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Welfare; Population; Economics; Welfare reform; Work (physics); Current Population Survey; Demographic economics; Nonmarket forces; Time allocation; Labour economics; Demography; Market economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.029168606525340635,"score_gpt":0.2528085708178516,"score_spread":0.22363996429251093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2497256593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98238593,0.0015454036,0.00009276627,0.0013305484,0.000083960695,0.000006757974,0.0085416455,0.000019372052,0.0059937094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987234,0.0016068897,0.00009413371,0.00026564716,0.00006724399,0.00002328116,0.0050318707,0.0000073505294,0.005669694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997316,0.00008450162,0.000024495126,0.00004069396,0.00005567432,0.00006301151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899906,0.00015089368,0.00047042637,0.000026171974,0.00019303682,0.00016045844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005542094,0.00013883707,0.0001296474,0.001015747,0.00030288938,0.0007271008,0.00037536735,0.00031920572,0.0036730743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014613102,0.00008200217,0.00016331063,0.0025918062,0.00017438346,0.00038898614,0.0004567563,0.00049940246,0.0008573842],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021685101,0.00016022255,0.891967,0.00014470653,0.00006108536,0.00010570833,0.004519604,0.00037106636,0.00033896707,0.0012302764,0.028343711,0.07254079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003305093,0.00005893576,0.9868398,0.000058934525,0.00001488672,0.000044829678,0.0025596733,0.0001503061,0.0001351764,0.00006211195,0.01006549,0.0000066251855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045941006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056359418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045941006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008338554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043490736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09134716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2499325108","doi":"10.5958/2454-1753.2016.00003.9","title":"The Patriarchal Agenda of Good Behaviour","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Motifs A Peer Reviewed International Journal of English Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Stephen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05409493599727457,"score_gpt":0.36138998103548875,"score_spread":0.3072950450382142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2499325108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13820827,0.0033257373,0.012119228,0.11576188,0.00043868157,0.000092932285,0.000036923313,0.000054108736,0.72996217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838112,0.00069528323,0.001342633,0.0025853275,0.00014507651,0.000041246763,0.0000047498897,0.000016235397,0.011358168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868378,0.00929184,0.00028779768,0.00069863675,0.0018366348,0.0010473657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99331385,0.002464804,0.0012431077,0.00064951327,0.0011490257,0.0011796387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074406774,0.00027195955,0.00029511633,0.001089566,0.007412628,0.00833706,0.0005823753,0.002138658,0.002962012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071256175,0.00026889655,0.0002504954,0.0005543,0.0526876,0.003661074,0.0058584497,0.004583716,0.0005608909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020049074,0.00004878725,0.0023066145,0.000098027,0.000010669207,0.00038335042,0.17121014,0.00008299592,0.0007074394,0.81047523,0.0026982017,0.011958477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027016838,0.00017600364,0.009705522,0.00051550695,0.000016617882,0.0012112699,0.10310441,0.0003241325,0.00086450996,0.50990146,0.37409928,0.000054239597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003138159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028162675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00833706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042980895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045311474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03935051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2499902101","doi":"10.1057/978-1-137-57535-7_6","title":"Women’s Labour and Capital Accumulation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Surplus value; Marxist philosophy; Aside; Capital (architecture); Neoclassical economics; Feminism; Relevance (law); Value (mathematics); Order (exchange); Feminist theory; Economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Gender studies; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Capitalism; History; Politics","score_opus":0.02866180380655726,"score_gpt":0.26854544636315913,"score_spread":0.23988364255660188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2499902101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053457256,0.028284604,0.0031684036,0.030941993,0.00051853276,0.000023015304,0.00007196925,0.000022838529,0.8835114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7989243,0.017370917,0.0010413544,0.0021696195,0.0005674004,0.000048537073,0.000036064426,0.000037948404,0.17980377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994407,0.00020753768,0.0000114898885,0.00007220922,0.00010308624,0.00016498854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997131,0.00016290593,0.00003684387,0.000020825408,0.000030196043,0.000036206166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009310423,0.00042268215,0.00020396514,0.0008450465,0.002798432,0.0038298883,0.000493737,0.0008214637,0.009563942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010136169,0.00009863877,0.00015870838,0.0013146126,0.011286207,0.0028829458,0.0026897348,0.0010756591,0.00051169936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060311872,0.000006608152,0.00026766423,0.000026524296,0.0000012240065,0.00007726762,0.008877201,0.00009191127,0.00005911858,0.97988933,0.0033590281,0.007338163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062924255,0.000020626247,0.0014397717,0.00031044811,0.0000032698454,0.0001347338,0.012926917,0.00013921833,0.00045766062,0.43867177,0.545881,0.000008364715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063689724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00936737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009563942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050905603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025705905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036934793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500625864","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139021555.007","title":"The reformation of family","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.031675503653603096,"score_gpt":0.2265310913016354,"score_spread":0.1948555876480323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500625864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03468095,0.007098535,0.013413805,0.034109816,0.0013680292,0.00002454467,0.00011358858,0.000061567094,0.9091292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9338116,0.0012962247,0.0015253419,0.0031506687,0.00040209809,0.00004412603,0.000034621313,0.000040062805,0.059695296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731535,0.0015724761,0.000050466333,0.0004169956,0.0002835018,0.0003612141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990361,0.00035815698,0.00009825853,0.00024179147,0.00014486647,0.00012090814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023349593,0.00035007764,0.00025656185,0.00064455613,0.0054606856,0.004954465,0.00065191713,0.002094854,0.006646211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037401435,0.0001435677,0.00023263248,0.0005151579,0.032820318,0.0057651424,0.0027694588,0.003578901,0.00080482377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037190373,0.0000014035827,0.00004063701,0.000003389443,4.925047e-7,0.00002074918,0.0029251785,0.00003602599,0.000012696862,0.9931078,0.001959398,0.0018885714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000124303015,0.000026145495,0.00051829783,0.00010312607,0.0000035977273,0.00022788452,0.004682561,0.00038880605,0.00017727754,0.53611386,0.45773014,0.000015857908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010907877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00856825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010907877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008585254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022966526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062290728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503848605","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-17326-9","title":"Women's Mental Health","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.03337618008270779,"score_gpt":0.3042976885019093,"score_spread":0.2709215084192015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503848605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012359505,0.07653395,0.0007957348,0.03298393,0.012283133,0.000044692883,0.00024482733,0.00012796906,0.8757498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008472383,0.033478647,0.000619601,0.009740486,0.0015726854,0.00005781764,0.0001284012,0.000058320584,0.9458715],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997578,0.000054741984,0.0000065272698,0.000025476573,0.00011623323,0.00003916825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99984634,0.00006063506,0.000009320875,0.000010495794,0.00003435785,0.000038863473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003572086,0.00044414937,0.00027563234,0.0006349295,0.0020065943,0.0029804362,0.00037267394,0.0012786351,0.03390163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010317365,0.00018312616,0.00025198507,0.00074042415,0.0013237101,0.002035098,0.0016659788,0.0018873689,0.009118763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005163438,0.00001341178,0.00015537807,0.00009848094,0.0000018360869,0.00007215774,0.0019693596,0.000056011697,0.00012649556,0.09090498,0.81650823,0.09008858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.9546405e-7,0.000003214481,0.00015561256,0.00013154138,6.104945e-7,0.00006942183,0.00031115522,0.000010337624,0.000017871984,0.0045012427,0.9947967,0.0000015940827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068685384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023917137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03390163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019852747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030890075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11341226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507375683","doi":"10.14288/1.0105904","title":"Intake priorities and criteria in a Family Service agency : a survey of waiting list cases and administrative implications.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Service (business); Business; Operations management; Sociology; Marketing; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.07523829975342537,"score_gpt":0.2638429675619972,"score_spread":0.18860466780857182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507375683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998483,0.00022601744,0.000055404493,0.00023604208,0.0000043587524,0.000041441548,0.000092787894,0.0000036993736,0.00085720303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794656,0.000512345,0.00021429177,0.000117385476,0.0000073232754,0.00006808695,0.00019874412,0.0000061170695,0.00092906016],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99564135,0.0012199961,0.000517574,0.00027007403,0.0012152491,0.0011357336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98746514,0.004096949,0.004286429,0.00022640533,0.0016604017,0.0022647346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036395192,0.00020276372,0.000270596,0.0027283137,0.0035563973,0.0020590306,0.0012218044,0.0007124545,0.0032027254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024514386,0.00065826665,0.00021201045,0.004086616,0.0019878424,0.0018694192,0.0025160536,0.0010296573,0.0004986891],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011510081,0.000245876,0.89538014,0.00010697129,0.000009620377,0.0013954669,0.082389496,0.00004622632,0.00034509425,0.00055034785,0.0022603457,0.017155256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008380303,0.00023669898,0.75976175,0.00015028768,0.000008037836,0.0013733313,0.23273262,0.00017692012,0.00017349834,0.0001887912,0.0051610502,0.000028580076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.099867456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14578302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099867456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00539848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00492811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19857234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509890423","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v8n9p1","title":"Fertility, Union Wage Setting and Social Security System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Keio University","keywords":"Economics; Social security; Fertility; Labour economics; Unemployment; Wage; Pension; Total fertility rate; Tax rate; Monopolistic competition; Wage rate; Monetary economics; Population; Macroeconomics; Family planning","score_opus":0.014055273421958026,"score_gpt":0.2536955624937207,"score_spread":0.23964028907176269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509890423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852217,0.00039790853,0.003813561,0.0011071672,0.000022231156,0.000015765212,0.00012472719,0.000016182721,0.009280866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981993,0.0001505325,0.00015952636,0.000026958765,0.0000078005205,0.0000037631062,0.000014650742,0.0000015119302,0.0014358776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999728,0.00011233351,0.000008209279,0.000034305496,0.00002601661,0.0000910899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990478,0.0002872318,0.0004179234,0.00004630459,0.000039869305,0.00016088874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007289936,0.00014562174,0.00023655967,0.00031342756,0.00058067805,0.0010380464,0.00034746653,0.00054624653,0.006136379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019097951,0.00013520119,0.000353626,0.00027461667,0.0010463045,0.000537175,0.00063145376,0.0004957552,0.0002506454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067037775,0.0006572159,0.32952985,0.00013409434,0.00020456307,0.0013914747,0.00200562,0.13550323,0.004097494,0.46610907,0.0035272245,0.056169778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004166841,0.001809039,0.5130323,0.00023971347,0.00027985204,0.0014194767,0.0073566306,0.19066893,0.003917554,0.25509816,0.02558237,0.00017922763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005769903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053913062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006136379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014603552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079481525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020528257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509946955","doi":"10.1080/00036846.2016.1218428","title":"Who was affected by new welfare reform strategies? Microdata estimates from Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Economics; Welfare; Econometrics; Public economics; Macroeconomics; Sociology; Market economy; Census","score_opus":0.009968015600394398,"score_gpt":0.21655167148742097,"score_spread":0.20658365588702657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509946955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97585154,0.00092389766,0.00028353604,0.002049737,0.000014284191,0.000059797272,0.015999703,0.000020295134,0.0047972864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908054,0.0007367889,0.00025753333,0.00026126104,0.000006307856,0.000027389338,0.005862067,0.0000071008567,0.002036232],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981862,0.00024045857,0.00010221184,0.00023336959,0.00042401892,0.0008138263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965868,0.00045465975,0.0010856225,0.00019038036,0.0011222425,0.00056036754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013465367,0.0001804649,0.00041495942,0.0013692068,0.0019784602,0.001403582,0.00090998935,0.00040898967,0.0015307661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047207815,0.00025291104,0.00048042976,0.0037828474,0.000673818,0.00040240443,0.000995865,0.0008129311,0.000194318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007460759,0.000027384971,0.9772021,0.000054698146,0.00013371641,0.00007060815,0.0024543002,0.0010158618,0.00013614088,0.00094518985,0.0064235283,0.011461802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075366092,0.000007767212,0.9894192,0.00004980352,0.000042826912,0.000019619001,0.003403896,0.00093172956,0.00012388444,0.00008898985,0.005891507,0.000013306668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99658525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022816798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022816798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02379521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16554826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512833114","doi":"10.1111/irel.12151","title":"Sexual Orientation, Income, and Stress at Work","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Lesbian; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Labour economics; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Gender studies; Engineering","score_opus":0.03659811755669884,"score_gpt":0.2747230542666978,"score_spread":0.23812493670999896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512833114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9713779,0.00058042374,0.004435309,0.0030182858,0.00004316456,0.000045918954,0.00041494684,0.000026620952,0.020057322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725133,0.0003467013,0.0005543291,0.00007862333,0.0000148252175,0.000021260073,0.00007485873,0.0000015096101,0.0016565033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998728,0.000051444742,0.000004299617,0.000014406151,0.000018292927,0.000038816164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995486,0.00012861694,0.00011624925,0.000024629513,0.00003248514,0.00014929575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037553255,0.0003724239,0.0001960297,0.0005543414,0.00052178424,0.0011243483,0.00042726574,0.0005250758,0.006374093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010753901,0.00013725513,0.00045034025,0.0004232119,0.00083792675,0.0005115979,0.00067268807,0.0004407867,0.0004395753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026320497,0.00060160435,0.9162028,0.000048133552,0.00010956812,0.00090189587,0.0013495282,0.008114385,0.00071346824,0.048301145,0.0016197435,0.021774616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106421605,0.0009467875,0.84528744,0.00020759935,0.00021375096,0.0011794709,0.005051276,0.04905878,0.00056341576,0.089995585,0.0073221084,0.00006738748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006493226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004890954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006493226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058250764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006515187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021323442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518186030","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2014-070","title":"Targeting Tax Relief at Youth Employment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Earnings; Unemployment; Labour economics; Youth unemployment; Demographic economics; Economics; Displacement (psychology); Unemployment rate; Difference in differences; Economic growth; Psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.02852532067005525,"score_gpt":0.2672817557107483,"score_spread":0.23875643504069305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518186030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8295056,0.004357248,0.002855804,0.017359942,0.00044639944,0.0007883549,0.0051175705,0.00022373378,0.13934536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967256,0.0014262835,0.0012329607,0.0029701078,0.00006828847,0.00015043071,0.00074931444,0.000014958031,0.026131779],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982247,0.00018587853,0.000015394455,0.00006979165,0.0004033732,0.0011008895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991326,0.00008557067,0.00008534109,0.000031544238,0.00022755908,0.0004372696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008627586,0.00016724241,0.0001931082,0.0007781664,0.0017952987,0.0008009551,0.0007454413,0.00058804185,0.005266038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020976998,0.00013141369,0.0003760669,0.0007307683,0.00052841293,0.00023553634,0.00089578377,0.0009208799,0.00033427062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010166059,0.0016163456,0.25973666,0.00066366966,0.00020192329,0.0008221403,0.004256583,0.006571295,0.008411978,0.057526108,0.22262427,0.43655244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049271306,0.0007452811,0.7129685,0.0006294694,0.00018296273,0.000324742,0.005916544,0.004683614,0.004559676,0.0032677737,0.26616898,0.000059644753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8756948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9470556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8756948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012798191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046126585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25007445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25186947","doi":"10.1177/1074840714548943","title":"Brief of Amici Curiae Economics Professors in Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System (U.S. Supreme Court)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Nursing","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"National Institute of Nursing Research; National Center for Research Resources; U.S. Public Health Service","keywords":"Scrutiny; Commission; Supreme court; Exploit; Market power; Power (physics); Power of attorney; Empirical research; Health care; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Public administration; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.05804216342623267,"score_gpt":0.34175839002526515,"score_spread":0.2837162265990325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25186947","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072512687,0.018655667,0.00034342404,0.85260713,0.03219306,0.0001452088,0.0003536493,0.00007854036,0.08837195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058311522,0.014709202,0.0003204027,0.6227798,0.014427919,0.00018990402,0.00020370772,0.000085635635,0.288972],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984804,0.00047411933,0.00007522361,0.0002443049,0.00031307293,0.0004129289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973304,0.0015377438,0.000110876674,0.000070297734,0.00036217234,0.00058848405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001982851,0.0005585603,0.0005318444,0.0008102935,0.014337684,0.0031906397,0.0013348401,0.013723004,0.02617229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077368016,0.00059887365,0.00045666297,0.00058170926,0.0013070169,0.0028982302,0.002067724,0.016644267,0.0033884305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001334939,0.00003814576,0.0005583119,0.00005520934,0.0000039250617,0.0013393973,0.0015485099,0.000022964448,0.00016517351,0.004536986,0.98203707,0.009681077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011141499,0.000035073852,0.0037747072,0.0002087875,0.000010439365,0.0006796498,0.0045983046,0.00007726516,0.00018737005,0.0014371333,0.988957,0.000023180455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048910744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11928497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048910744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049485774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008789572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09725207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523103814","doi":"","title":"Gender, institutions, and economic development: Findings and open research and policy issues","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Empowerment; Institution; Politics; Inequality; Political science; Demographic economics; Gender inequality; Occupational segregation; Socioeconomic status; Economic growth; Gender and development; Social inequality; Development economics; Economics; Social change; Sociology; Labour economics; Population; Social transformation","score_opus":0.10154256019758984,"score_gpt":0.37889605609114485,"score_spread":0.277353495893555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523103814","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08300395,0.6116648,0.0012237155,0.22626339,0.0009135923,0.00002704009,0.0006615643,0.000022918948,0.07621895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5629273,0.42086175,0.0009171534,0.00902954,0.0016011372,0.00004854615,0.00020586653,0.00002016884,0.004388411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976216,0.0012964313,0.000062352556,0.0002394402,0.0002946578,0.0004854825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98406434,0.013680664,0.0008863996,0.00040382464,0.0005314385,0.0004333625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049953186,0.0003755279,0.0010753061,0.0026973446,0.0019652843,0.00939911,0.000810823,0.0019525579,0.009324877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007167734,0.00022106031,0.00044543386,0.01051335,0.0106678745,0.00960761,0.0033993253,0.0018441586,0.00051609764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014410252,0.00022500588,0.031924494,0.0026605772,0.0000929547,0.00043688907,0.013727097,0.0007243592,0.00020186292,0.68864053,0.028003247,0.23321882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037231097,0.00012351388,0.10365804,0.013733494,0.00012590172,0.0003911711,0.10723267,0.0011044637,0.0004479349,0.49170142,0.28137264,0.00007151381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009415155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009467671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009415155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004780809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004505374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0346874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524075940","doi":"","title":"THE STATUS OF WOMEN IN THE SURVEYING AND MAPPING WORLD","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Cartography; Regional science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02248299325226807,"score_gpt":0.267014926502185,"score_spread":0.24453193324991693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524075940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724449,0.00082598266,0.00042705017,0.002151452,0.000050118782,0.000014117628,0.0017988024,0.000008868504,0.022278689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895215,0.00078180624,0.00028640887,0.00013560217,0.000017271033,0.000016991826,0.00046191548,0.000006326232,0.008772201],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993812,0.00032359536,0.000029982946,0.00005545412,0.00007695562,0.00013270997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985501,0.00041965494,0.00035761565,0.00010619842,0.0003622644,0.00020422938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014112514,0.00009920285,0.00010711612,0.0017144139,0.0010458725,0.0010326977,0.00020074216,0.00019965241,0.004926859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00430494,0.00009181196,0.00009039117,0.0021649925,0.00058548246,0.0011022735,0.0006907037,0.00026628256,0.0006257622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098550525,0.00002254531,0.91148007,0.00006916064,0.000017934037,0.00009558296,0.029146159,0.000066075416,0.0009630888,0.0034584675,0.0060481485,0.048534162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027346034,0.000073740186,0.8799392,0.00009903814,0.000013262281,0.0001893094,0.0772607,0.00016970928,0.0007549694,0.00060967,0.040870536,0.00001711174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033533573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.070468545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033533573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003611694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005242749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066676795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526139390","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1385","title":"Book Notes: The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Mothers and Fathers Are Going Broke, by Elizabeth Warren and Amelia Warren Tyagi","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trap (plumbing); Class (philosophy); Sociology; Middle class; Economic history; History; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Geography; Epistemology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.018956277256784018,"score_gpt":0.25342887171980655,"score_spread":0.23447259446302254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526139390","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002526272,0.020542698,0.00047679737,0.9247143,0.0076737795,0.000015995412,0.00016173862,0.000023902812,0.043864455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04173697,0.03860001,0.0013210803,0.4795566,0.0124930795,0.00016717715,0.0001668527,0.000196863,0.4257614],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994746,0.00023980558,0.0000177952,0.00006608756,0.00012851777,0.000073228344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973074,0.0020173586,0.00010083494,0.000051086965,0.0002880794,0.00023530547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001420307,0.00041049442,0.00037841147,0.0004757384,0.0070072087,0.0037012626,0.0008985581,0.0060831932,0.019596042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005550007,0.0004326812,0.0001929304,0.0011671926,0.0050179847,0.006834602,0.0016198817,0.009128264,0.0037316123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005036715,0.000008208817,0.0003536336,0.00001952125,0.0000012697217,0.000045474404,0.0030435247,0.000013146332,0.000023376919,0.02231967,0.966229,0.007938187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001104914,0.0000107434425,0.0018057761,0.0003374873,0.0000043460036,0.00013123965,0.024719642,0.000049809674,0.00007845471,0.017659482,0.955176,0.000015961874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054052003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20071614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054052003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015318583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040527727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107474744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532209844","doi":"10.1177/0020715216674252","title":"Explaining patterns of inequality in childcare service use across 31 developed economies: A welfare state perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Disadvantaged; Welfare state; Economics; Welfare; Social inequality; Social Welfare; Perspective (graphical); Government (linguistics); Labour economics; Public economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Political science; Market economy; Politics","score_opus":0.09101223177950038,"score_gpt":0.40307622121197717,"score_spread":0.3120639894324768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532209844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99744594,0.00019425446,0.00033328636,0.00019842897,0.0000020006078,0.000007818428,0.00020840681,0.0000020592831,0.0016077553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996557,0.00008055364,0.00006595207,0.000008871753,0.0000015504036,0.000005183521,0.00009125756,8.978535e-7,0.000090132984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992423,0.0002861898,0.00003754179,0.00009901544,0.000080183156,0.0002548257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985904,0.0006727781,0.00036015836,0.000095817224,0.0001643907,0.00011649455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010350252,0.00015510566,0.00042154896,0.0019924045,0.00089365593,0.0016325683,0.0003876363,0.0002807418,0.0031772251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036929443,0.00016210316,0.00036229932,0.00387966,0.0014604214,0.00097545364,0.0026027707,0.0006063227,0.00013638573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049228118,0.00006355209,0.9764214,0.000032699434,0.00009574615,0.000118701835,0.005373337,0.0009395431,0.00019916882,0.0076315915,0.00023879412,0.008836126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039239735,0.000029096396,0.9831928,0.00005508493,0.000028363027,0.000029260294,0.010840228,0.0020326253,0.00007046222,0.0028592106,0.0008514103,0.0000075221224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058613464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062267285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058613464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012719053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000854506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116544604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532425429","doi":"","title":"Who Drives the Car? Hypothesizing the Impact of Trends in Post- Secondary Education on the Labour Market, Home Production and Gender Roles","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Labour economics; Demographic economics; Business; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.039287853826804255,"score_gpt":0.308707771898102,"score_spread":0.2694199180712977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532425429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9533898,0.0014501034,0.00083120796,0.012408709,0.000121164645,0.00010065183,0.0011815933,0.000007511322,0.030509342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966078,0.0008412619,0.0002026608,0.0004520697,0.00006449744,0.000038181086,0.00030286988,0.000003491031,0.0014872071],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992575,0.0002045829,0.000039077255,0.00016421571,0.00010435419,0.00023025402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959091,0.0022792788,0.0010450846,0.000111415306,0.00037158947,0.00028349194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021002258,0.00024344468,0.0002068798,0.0012109972,0.00084789284,0.0022260626,0.00070826884,0.0009772382,0.009627932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006659698,0.00021890749,0.0005564555,0.0014698188,0.0014973226,0.0039685853,0.00092130585,0.0009952063,0.0010848944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013727644,0.00020589169,0.9421755,0.00023204437,0.00006369669,0.0003169575,0.009675443,0.0004124804,0.0002459503,0.025130045,0.0025375953,0.018867148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017445207,0.00027780427,0.90111196,0.0003294265,0.00009314858,0.00017340321,0.06936032,0.003612073,0.00037667222,0.010480395,0.014144136,0.000023279817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02498981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030533746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02498981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012696928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019536149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049688697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532952563","doi":"","title":"Gender-Based Analysis and Differing Worldviews","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04753100282603695,"score_gpt":0.2787211458913849,"score_spread":0.23119014306534796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532952563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7839306,0.0023863448,0.0021921566,0.0053742607,0.00016836074,0.00007902831,0.00070496096,0.000023123577,0.20514114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99427384,0.00043959872,0.0003756082,0.00019992386,0.000013121277,0.000024283208,0.00009196378,0.000018310744,0.0045632743],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943929,0.0020636143,0.00012330957,0.00041224118,0.0013507942,0.0016572184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99455124,0.0018564975,0.0004647917,0.00039991408,0.0019181813,0.0008093779],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007854354,0.0004457928,0.00049114495,0.0091307005,0.01770276,0.008529531,0.0017237024,0.0007585948,0.006943496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013396807,0.0002473411,0.00036353132,0.009326471,0.020449147,0.002789511,0.004127983,0.0012853777,0.00020455975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015414822,0.000028529486,0.040025845,0.00007521503,0.00002449221,0.00029349042,0.71736753,0.00014589117,0.0011629551,0.21706985,0.003159415,0.020492628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000111199315,0.000016858354,0.10635182,0.00017478559,0.000032146225,0.00012009573,0.83498514,0.00023088975,0.00058611337,0.017095707,0.04034623,0.00004905287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.891454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93151236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98229724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039228477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030396312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28462386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535040021","doi":"10.1596/978-1-4648-0902-6_ch3","title":"Female Labor Force Participation and Labor Market Outcomes in Latin America and the Caribbean","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"The World Bank eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Earnings; Unemployment; Political science; Social security; Informal sector; Productivity; Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.020741211762900138,"score_gpt":0.27181009056330957,"score_spread":0.25106887880040946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535040021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13429692,0.40550444,0.0004741901,0.02157699,0.0013388688,0.000056606044,0.002627326,0.000051293748,0.43407333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4756876,0.39190304,0.0007888398,0.0033172255,0.0014635595,0.00016240051,0.002685567,0.00007701652,0.12391482],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991274,0.00002042569,0.000004126431,0.000010853953,0.00002825487,0.000023524606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997696,0.000106425614,0.000040603787,0.000007546666,0.00004110451,0.000034671786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035048352,0.00035463966,0.00022050773,0.0018710429,0.000766203,0.0013032083,0.00030770493,0.0003498963,0.00920282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010449189,0.0000882153,0.00019711716,0.003703194,0.00048645106,0.00075183425,0.00077358756,0.00043818424,0.0005914944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080034675,0.00011681592,0.092415646,0.0016508042,0.000048499613,0.0011136554,0.033510435,0.0005984761,0.0005660411,0.060002167,0.1986116,0.61128575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000080853515,0.00004991467,0.2686956,0.0034326764,0.000033454733,0.0010656869,0.022847075,0.00025555457,0.00019264137,0.01042514,0.69296104,0.00003317483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07541267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.109233275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07541267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001127791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096161093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1499474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535365207","doi":"","title":"\"I'm finally there\": An examination of a feminist program working to change the dynamics of women's poverty","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UWSpace (University of Waterloo)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Dynamics (music); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Economic growth; Pedagogy; Economics","score_opus":0.020217412370490705,"score_gpt":0.2481912860990694,"score_spread":0.2279738737285787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535365207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88502866,0.0018100413,0.0015229508,0.034452893,0.00081560604,0.0008980899,0.00021917286,0.00012925244,0.075123295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92894423,0.0031499944,0.0030707326,0.008001547,0.00019764322,0.00060849753,0.00016805386,0.00017064987,0.055688616],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891138,0.004749113,0.00012879084,0.00044588794,0.0018862251,0.0036761595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99012774,0.0028987306,0.00047199914,0.0001527032,0.0020148589,0.0043339604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008808648,0.0011520792,0.00078950333,0.0033088622,0.0782959,0.006019386,0.0057086158,0.0036860052,0.005792714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011138728,0.0010088956,0.00051779585,0.0035768885,0.018714266,0.0027657987,0.00905698,0.0086521,0.00043136292],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022435384,0.00011332099,0.0014406969,0.000116591495,0.0000029020023,0.00073869625,0.98023474,0.000040058876,0.00034284487,0.0019309606,0.0037030498,0.011313667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039723254,0.000042440864,0.002766438,0.000119994635,0.000004405114,0.00012526015,0.9577041,0.00004046296,0.00015010047,0.0001495619,0.03887871,0.000014570375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8211706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9348097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8211706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07268461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.114252314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5273662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2536305334","doi":"","title":"New Evidence on the Human Capital Explanation on the Family Gap","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.1722585495377821,"score_gpt":0.3549215484054198,"score_spread":0.18266299886763768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2536305334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6969778,0.01522745,0.0077269003,0.0794804,0.0003270345,0.0000282404,0.0017858009,0.000081296865,0.19836506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929524,0.0027571975,0.00021667872,0.0011065267,0.00018958282,0.000005589153,0.00017629973,0.00001086279,0.0025847887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936527,0.0001401693,0.000018874985,0.00010225649,0.00016763019,0.00020581794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827732,0.011370578,0.0025144955,0.0009587212,0.001380634,0.0010023223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002318009,0.00025853165,0.00048067258,0.0015947022,0.0017116056,0.0024643114,0.001122142,0.0010003166,0.02399892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014845458,0.00013405611,0.00029213887,0.0021357904,0.00416279,0.0030834035,0.0022237974,0.0013060544,0.0006180489],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004969046,0.0001694127,0.3372914,0.00040322673,0.00012336149,0.0014989408,0.011911246,0.0031516184,0.0003483211,0.5274866,0.02299039,0.09412853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015480719,0.00007907395,0.43939078,0.00091107044,0.00014665574,0.0005729355,0.032850694,0.005316704,0.0005449265,0.4069078,0.11305061,0.00007397671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2219472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21698678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2219472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043069287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044945227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44131064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538069817","doi":"10.1002/soej.12150","title":"Evaluating Workplace Mandates with Flows Versus Stocks: An Application to California Paid Family Leave","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Workforce; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economics; Business; Finance; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.035369645155830486,"score_gpt":0.3119097286042717,"score_spread":0.2765400834484412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2538069817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93512094,0.0010400829,0.013103217,0.0020938062,0.0002140223,0.0055400743,0.011168751,0.00026021397,0.03145896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9308646,0.0004906843,0.04783519,0.0009655731,0.00013164413,0.0070576984,0.0055598505,0.000082805585,0.0070120143],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97813725,0.012786765,0.001059925,0.0019937695,0.0052937763,0.0007285245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9156857,0.06657581,0.0067729144,0.0028283766,0.0069466247,0.0011905236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029816383,0.00077811826,0.0008915994,0.0017975423,0.002030992,0.0018088225,0.002706053,0.0015112875,0.005705139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08647989,0.00045305464,0.0027926208,0.0033259792,0.0010024322,0.0012601046,0.0026522232,0.0021825938,0.0003385147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005437408,0.005495252,0.7756492,0.0012524521,0.0031544496,0.00039422838,0.0034226193,0.02632366,0.0013973791,0.015179673,0.023855768,0.13843799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019600387,0.0075953957,0.87478906,0.00043997195,0.0027524906,0.00009572081,0.0056023556,0.05750255,0.0017738871,0.0061854133,0.041132692,0.00017039767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1975735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19176427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1975735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005695728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008915419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39284694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550903168","doi":"","title":"Les résultats éducatifs de long terme des élèves de l'école secondaire privée au Québec : une évaluation des effets de traitement avec données longitudinales","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.037419987774759626,"score_gpt":0.2886515240676163,"score_spread":0.25123153629285666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550903168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9476377,0.01457643,0.005813859,0.0014191043,0.0003334423,0.0008823195,0.024773197,0.00015804783,0.0044059134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97629786,0.0022360224,0.0033730005,0.00071319204,0.00007589229,0.0014668836,0.0072924653,0.000056191184,0.008488545],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918331,0.0035903214,0.00084327825,0.0013317366,0.0017037499,0.0006978027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9612205,0.01486408,0.00613048,0.003257501,0.013176765,0.0013506531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016410582,0.0009032407,0.0011695165,0.0015891092,0.0015236905,0.0016734974,0.0012520291,0.0010217144,0.0043091667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029282944,0.00038591053,0.0034562375,0.0034077195,0.0007866533,0.0008638305,0.00100147,0.0009865528,0.00053214864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010530256,0.00017732309,0.9625669,0.00073381636,0.003634926,0.00007129814,0.0014620398,0.00082642835,0.00060109724,0.00019784614,0.0029329248,0.025742395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048362068,0.000523072,0.9927249,0.0002188524,0.0011875785,0.000025863894,0.00045805605,0.00034043277,0.00037916753,0.000051066792,0.004019234,0.00002331324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75273025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7774917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24726975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073095523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011193131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4974519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552109385","doi":"","title":"Essays on the economics of gender","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Uppsala Universitet; Simon Fraser University; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Universiteit Maastricht; University of Southampton; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; University of Oregon; University of Leicester; McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience; Harvard University; Northwestern University; University of Miami; Sage Foundation; University of Toronto; National University of Singapore; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Economics; Neoclassical economics; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics","score_opus":0.0224778943701286,"score_gpt":0.27206263105969236,"score_spread":0.24958473668956377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552109385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008519751,0.0729723,0.0026322815,0.28787515,0.014397384,0.000030450532,0.00030637527,0.000021654198,0.61324465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30127877,0.13385926,0.0025825973,0.06961803,0.028925885,0.00019113891,0.00038076442,0.00014363226,0.46301994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992229,0.00031257395,0.000027739341,0.00009896744,0.00026221725,0.00007570323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948154,0.0040030256,0.00021795735,0.00017871836,0.00055852154,0.00022634277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017828522,0.00050798437,0.00035986424,0.0012159281,0.0026632762,0.003017252,0.00051155576,0.0019010243,0.017182505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006775403,0.00017433825,0.00032353948,0.0012712677,0.005872775,0.0037354042,0.0014655,0.0029211976,0.0024755616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019272378,0.000036550682,0.00043839033,0.00010392925,0.0000075424296,0.00007070792,0.0012866037,0.00016817515,0.00009747518,0.7506262,0.2265872,0.020558067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012452745,0.000017604849,0.0017970643,0.00058758014,0.000006451096,0.00009912531,0.0019496775,0.000113135684,0.000089670706,0.2828486,0.71246845,0.00001010204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013308376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001664086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017182505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019009607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010905748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05748117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557742881","doi":"10.1086/689203","title":"Long-Term Employment and Earnings Patterns of Welfare Recipients: The Role of the Local Labor Market","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Labour economics; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Cash; Diversity (politics); Work (physics); Demographic economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.013423786075730512,"score_gpt":0.27792028941672314,"score_spread":0.2644965033409926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557742881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99447733,0.0041453587,0.000029982746,0.0002625308,0.000004972992,0.0000029438838,0.00007963476,7.6382827e-7,0.0009964699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977564,0.0019452696,0.000014707952,0.00001856807,0.000006631607,0.0000024438793,0.00005983201,6.3234563e-7,0.00019546317],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996928,0.00014698552,0.00001663801,0.000032296964,0.000044085773,0.00006712687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993703,0.00015766066,0.0002376472,0.00002518556,0.000090251124,0.00011889472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010337761,0.00008130583,0.00024444482,0.0008587713,0.00040190856,0.0005583937,0.00036522668,0.0002498242,0.0016244851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017335215,0.00006911537,0.00016459175,0.0011282541,0.00040350732,0.00050464633,0.00050066505,0.000185015,0.00021762596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009634718,0.00008529849,0.9686479,0.00010708556,0.00005665201,0.00028066544,0.0038868818,0.00007961703,0.00023265765,0.00034361857,0.00037207,0.025811238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016152793,0.000034312394,0.9929731,0.00005878105,0.0000118892995,0.00010006244,0.0059762723,0.000052776893,0.00002434146,0.000079505735,0.0006846327,0.000002684268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013639798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025385605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013639798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004923897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000423179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027120829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561787847","doi":"10.3386/w22950","title":"Targeting Policies: Multiple Testing and Distributional Treatment Effects","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Michigan Diabetes Research Center, University of Michigan","keywords":"Computer science; Economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.35208519179057884,"score_gpt":0.5063554751075703,"score_spread":0.15427028331699144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561787847","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16158842,0.0011784475,0.8005279,0.011228585,0.00095935294,0.0021591196,0.0005708722,0.0008104567,0.020976909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7753161,0.00021394259,0.21886373,0.0009493605,0.00029539387,0.002559789,0.00019113676,0.000100606034,0.001509914],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6515717,0.3000457,0.0064514354,0.017388897,0.021657243,0.0028851228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.34264442,0.58837855,0.028075622,0.030245515,0.00864907,0.0020068593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17592771,0.0014391745,0.003118416,0.00375592,0.002684992,0.004088462,0.005826353,0.0036794718,0.007764561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.53007585,0.001031734,0.0033486455,0.0038028408,0.014437936,0.006913057,0.0047417805,0.007151065,0.0004166508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024094179,0.0011437756,0.13633755,0.001103156,0.0044898735,0.0016998947,0.005587887,0.030279066,0.0016365808,0.36950076,0.010774982,0.43503702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005733727,0.0014237465,0.039940823,0.00043496894,0.0007551541,0.0007823731,0.0021712128,0.28784558,0.004797857,0.65298855,0.008071772,0.00021459686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042828117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029605408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17592771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037543168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052585946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9304058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564511638","doi":"10.1002/pam.22062","title":"The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Household Finances","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Education Sciences; University of Toronto; Ohio State University","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Earnings; Economics; Debt; Point (geometry); National Longitudinal Surveys; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Educational attainment; Labour economics; Tax credit; Demographic economics; State income tax; Tax reform; Public economics; Finance; Economic growth","score_opus":0.023326265586216838,"score_gpt":0.3270358370563677,"score_spread":0.3037095714701509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564511638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99536383,0.000059346894,0.0008590679,0.00037697505,0.0000151603035,0.000044497167,0.0011021786,0.000012771115,0.0021660968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99837154,0.0000389229,0.00026226457,0.00005366542,0.0000053362246,0.000041883766,0.0004471523,0.0000017703162,0.00077736407],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983954,0.00097262074,0.000050825827,0.00015069798,0.00011946275,0.00031101148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98934036,0.0070362836,0.002116344,0.0005136933,0.0005085261,0.00048482366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004092751,0.00026350524,0.0004925299,0.0005411875,0.00043006937,0.0014576765,0.0007696295,0.0011164561,0.005659361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017249,0.0002315175,0.00074596924,0.0010034909,0.00071528665,0.00067806576,0.00080237107,0.0013505412,0.00033781934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016021265,0.0009953732,0.69256014,0.000072681825,0.00040860497,0.00040645516,0.0002586367,0.26883492,0.00083661184,0.01578857,0.0033234784,0.014912367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007037846,0.0024069054,0.51888067,0.00008972963,0.00046576493,0.00013974853,0.0015877207,0.46000516,0.0021673988,0.007845656,0.0056283306,0.00007909373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027313516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022966294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027313516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001963779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012829902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05430907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565011519","doi":"10.1177/0891243205278166","title":"Divorce Culture and Marital Gender Equality","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gender & Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Gender equality; Leverage (statistics); Marital status; Multilevel model; Survey data collection; Distribution (mathematics); Demographic economics; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Political science; Demography; Economics; Population","score_opus":0.041852589343245324,"score_gpt":0.30474931979571523,"score_spread":0.2628967304524699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565011519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954999,0.0005329733,0.00015358563,0.00016857339,0.000012579909,0.000002294739,0.00004751372,0.0000010870585,0.003581457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996656,0.00011750551,0.000026866093,0.00001435706,0.0000049015525,0.0000011056943,0.000019898655,5.8794035e-7,0.0001491561],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908626,0.00040232902,0.000055387656,0.000088011766,0.00016976819,0.00019825646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99550724,0.0014471046,0.0016701643,0.00024456013,0.00046639438,0.00066447054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011113193,0.00011048131,0.0002683994,0.00077459414,0.0010987625,0.0011284422,0.0002547571,0.00015302785,0.005584669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008414951,0.00007817027,0.00021125718,0.0008416894,0.00096626393,0.0006682675,0.0018315084,0.0005143907,0.00021079379],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005724451,0.000057385972,0.9769638,0.000021361802,0.00008681251,0.000089871304,0.004962855,0.00008150546,0.00012276093,0.0027518708,0.00015882324,0.014645618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031091465,0.00006768736,0.98847383,0.00004160381,0.000028435534,0.00016263654,0.00858122,0.00015634533,0.00016660136,0.00092595554,0.0013850214,0.0000074715836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005134116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008667931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005584669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004769076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044876797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01868254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565400267","doi":"10.36095/banxico/di.2016.16","title":"You, Me and the Mean: a Semiparametric Approach to the Redistributive Effects of Transfer Programs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Transfer (computing); Econometrics; Semiparametric model; Economics; Demographic economics; Computer science; Nonparametric statistics","score_opus":0.02017188578201611,"score_gpt":0.262547496809237,"score_spread":0.24237561102722088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565400267","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14753562,0.0019219648,0.80854845,0.010779818,0.00019469547,0.00015474572,0.0006698292,0.00023162038,0.029963328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9372542,0.001586113,0.038572095,0.00064431975,0.000399418,0.0002557165,0.00014702766,0.00015711911,0.020983871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944641,0.0042744083,0.00009894463,0.0004780242,0.00033223297,0.00035235359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9660696,0.030317878,0.0012279431,0.0014161655,0.0005456754,0.00042273913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009096154,0.000575982,0.001579415,0.0012264566,0.0008483992,0.0032313017,0.0020953433,0.0018937998,0.01542595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03151843,0.00067965983,0.001721305,0.001445892,0.0033487694,0.003855096,0.0032240057,0.0027725012,0.0005537492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014346924,0.00010595902,0.0041823024,0.00011454018,0.00017993424,0.00013760981,0.0010568518,0.037090145,0.00026263628,0.9343989,0.0019953847,0.02033231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047535395,0.00009243451,0.0030446833,0.000064506494,0.00010270838,0.0000615507,0.0004690889,0.15097675,0.00021409104,0.84042364,0.004466611,0.000036387057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053948206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061254334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01542595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020681422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001820742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051604927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25654640","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-444-59568-3.00026-2","title":"The Labor Market in Computable General Equilibrium Models","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Handbook of computable general equilibrium modeling","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Computable general equilibrium; Economics; Unemployment; Involuntary unemployment; Microsimulation; Supply and demand; Supply side; Demand side; Wage; Principal (computer security); Labour economics; Production (economics); Wage bargaining; Labor demand; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0339982875139838,"score_gpt":0.2581977800697055,"score_spread":0.2241994925557217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25654640","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006196119,0.042067904,0.8118183,0.006925903,0.00069556694,0.00006775772,0.0012397586,0.00080778956,0.1301808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42941386,0.09382672,0.3861202,0.0014857845,0.0026447268,0.00082389434,0.002957694,0.0009786675,0.08174851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944896,0.00029281678,0.000027149534,0.000075927535,0.00011676162,0.000038337403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982822,0.0012949461,0.000057893,0.00018243259,0.00014731269,0.000035282017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010654518,0.0011856033,0.0015827729,0.0010338662,0.0005344312,0.0026900647,0.0019974816,0.0016714798,0.01123872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005342729,0.00082979753,0.0009773993,0.0029347274,0.0017544433,0.003857197,0.0010361671,0.0025526066,0.0024684856],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058513997,0.00002187106,0.00013222241,0.00010069902,0.000012816321,0.000027951697,0.0000755027,0.047211204,0.000068294125,0.9159628,0.015020096,0.021360818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005228501,0.000002821509,0.000092661845,0.000048680296,0.0000057231077,0.000015099275,0.000023234868,0.05769605,0.000054267133,0.916753,0.02529496,0.000008272063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008254561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006672034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01123872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024363177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021065671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0375973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565759628","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.598841","title":"A Political Economy Model of Congressional Careers, Second Version","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Political economy; Public administration; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.011708773757367664,"score_gpt":0.2597042795353482,"score_spread":0.24799550577798052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565759628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10243565,0.0047170673,0.1558156,0.06998671,0.0008888434,0.00021601655,0.002986254,0.0002651824,0.66268873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7479194,0.002538231,0.009061992,0.0011115952,0.00048172902,0.00023813204,0.00042576907,0.00007138029,0.2381517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948573,0.00019949973,0.000015589634,0.000070235394,0.00007341887,0.00015552502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989191,0.0005967409,0.00009857382,0.000067500565,0.00018665715,0.00013148987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011160425,0.00031597356,0.00058206,0.0008212763,0.0019365279,0.004284376,0.0011273973,0.00321943,0.04592482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004101037,0.00033431206,0.0006930227,0.0015552405,0.0012903449,0.003241973,0.0006896667,0.0018171066,0.0031213374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012093238,0.000027813636,0.00040218423,0.000023097668,0.000006384934,0.000053333344,0.00023971152,0.008613985,0.000045628785,0.9756773,0.009808053,0.0050903806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033620836,0.000031432286,0.0017720375,0.00005643106,0.000019155825,0.00012624639,0.0006509975,0.042746298,0.000059669845,0.91659063,0.037896577,0.000016961234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019554514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021344362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04592482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003094257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031118086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15363383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566813662","doi":"","title":"\"Are We There Yet?\" The Quest for Gender Equity in Family Analysis.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian home economics journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Gender equity; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Business; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Political science","score_opus":0.0763730460708086,"score_gpt":0.31002966606393423,"score_spread":0.23365661999312565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566813662","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061371803,0.1337923,0.019397711,0.6386296,0.0021780275,0.000050007617,0.00047130426,0.000045437584,0.14406386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94445395,0.02065264,0.0052111004,0.020184413,0.0012516485,0.00006491396,0.000063854255,0.000045442746,0.008072069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943715,0.003969893,0.00008823725,0.00019612354,0.00083716016,0.0005371697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912369,0.0055688173,0.00041496826,0.0004154062,0.0016556036,0.0007082999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011627864,0.00038613574,0.0006275468,0.0020626266,0.008128425,0.005204478,0.0012316433,0.0020585859,0.0050052856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032284547,0.00030060776,0.00026803272,0.0032266178,0.028345032,0.007510716,0.0025665017,0.003887801,0.00022401639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025730858,0.000012311703,0.004260736,0.000070103066,0.000016938815,0.00007415906,0.010946055,0.00019943324,0.000048647686,0.9067289,0.04418998,0.033427063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010375956,0.000009920713,0.011361215,0.0006255334,0.000029771152,0.0000639819,0.02922501,0.0006394997,0.00012408716,0.8875168,0.07037344,0.000020351768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36430487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63686794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36430487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012284293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017014043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72436875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2568893682","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Technological Change within the Home","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Technological change; Economic geography; Environmental planning; Geography; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.023072749810582438,"score_gpt":0.2841976746293099,"score_spread":0.26112492481872746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2568893682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9666823,0.0022897497,0.0022835804,0.0016260914,0.000050376104,0.00003846692,0.0023879157,0.000021918564,0.02461963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942509,0.0014565478,0.0006407704,0.0001566439,0.00003742476,0.000021251426,0.00068309874,0.000008267004,0.0027449797],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991966,0.0002579576,0.000031666557,0.00019580487,0.00015646398,0.0001614487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845624,0.0006910512,0.000465349,0.0001654153,0.0001232811,0.000098552955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005867411,0.00018039212,0.00017187349,0.0005495195,0.0005375594,0.0015600563,0.000447607,0.00043691628,0.006192092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003443092,0.00014353744,0.00041843057,0.0015496808,0.00072299247,0.0014740301,0.0012177727,0.0007197329,0.0005215478],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024734717,0.00045383,0.7535553,0.0002816527,0.00041072248,0.0010690243,0.0066101435,0.024447063,0.0015739512,0.056552116,0.00806137,0.1467375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011934509,0.00018516525,0.9471967,0.00012436161,0.00009236194,0.0001885492,0.0051241014,0.0051849866,0.0010380814,0.006941523,0.033881012,0.00003121292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022070594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028181802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022070594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014236275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005549518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043884218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581151158","doi":"10.1177/0020715216689294","title":"Sex segregation by field of study and the influence of labor markets: Evidence from 39 countries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Unemployment; Economics; Generalized method of moments; Field (mathematics); Demographic economics; Empirical research; Labour economics; Panel data; Economic growth; Econometrics","score_opus":0.03771536605524133,"score_gpt":0.3912157241857933,"score_spread":0.353500358130552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581151158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966175,0.0015248623,0.00007224323,0.00007966903,0.000005864666,0.000007239811,0.00055250846,0.0000014685496,0.0011386645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861896,0.00069340423,0.00005513046,0.000022516402,0.0000051393677,0.0000056239332,0.00047828033,0.0000016750612,0.000119342134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975666,0.0011003216,0.0002384317,0.00040409167,0.00036639752,0.0003241975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98570806,0.004448526,0.0072438275,0.00080965087,0.0008673509,0.0009226147],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002183349,0.0002247294,0.0005183638,0.0027573118,0.0007917352,0.0010959812,0.00044960785,0.00028179729,0.0021720622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007306841,0.00031153997,0.00059853157,0.0042996635,0.00090826553,0.00056366326,0.001702429,0.0003700307,0.00022187857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081983744,0.000019680865,0.99381787,0.00007220303,0.00011813036,0.00009752332,0.0008696252,0.00007137668,0.00006145982,0.00016296394,0.00020844498,0.00441875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067291253,0.000035517587,0.99667525,0.00008875066,0.00004451455,0.00009364949,0.0019599623,0.000073936106,0.0000664618,0.000046555113,0.0009043654,0.000004249806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021476934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02748999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004370027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049680204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042703807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582236365","doi":"10.15195/v4.a7","title":"The Decoupling of Sex and Marriage: Cohort Trends in Who Did and Did Not Delay Sex until Marriage for U.S. Women Born 1938–1985","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute on Aging; York University","keywords":"National Survey of Family Growth; Demography; Premarital sex; Sexual revolution; Cohort; Decoupling (probability); Human sexuality; Psychology; Family planning; Sociology; Medicine; Gender studies; Population; Research methodology","score_opus":0.03124270440920372,"score_gpt":0.32919151703339045,"score_spread":0.2979488126241867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2582236365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99813324,0.00039230744,0.000120459954,0.00013387942,0.000011675251,0.0000040811356,0.00066807994,0.0000021414103,0.0005340826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865985,0.00020864332,0.0000896794,0.000034588636,0.000007558452,0.000004048801,0.00064205687,0.0000012984979,0.0003523623],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997187,0.00006558847,0.000021635487,0.000070703965,0.00004293728,0.00008039401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984487,0.00029821388,0.000753218,0.00015558266,0.0001456346,0.00019863111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015653617,0.0001421781,0.00019328394,0.0007611891,0.00047377078,0.0005095767,0.00036909088,0.0002717478,0.0011721535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003518463,0.00017499161,0.0003920119,0.0011541409,0.00024047223,0.0005877043,0.0005968616,0.00067709485,0.00013188204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005431285,0.00001187338,0.9967264,0.0000050893786,0.000036971305,0.000016085392,0.00037479034,0.000052813397,0.00007859888,0.00011880238,0.000113362345,0.002410845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018218111,0.000026833433,0.9989066,0.0000064482897,0.000014905813,0.000020062631,0.00029083854,0.0001294155,0.00005410313,0.000041111784,0.00050589995,0.000002048542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072302535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14761008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072302535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051300944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007383723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14376336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W258557602","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199322510.001.0001","title":"Social Democratic America","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Korea Labor Institute; University of Toronto; University of Oxford; University of California, Los Angeles; University of Cambridge; Yale University; Stryker; Sage Foundation; University of Pennsylvania; Harvard Kennedy School; Princeton University","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.021318033743028,"score_gpt":0.28628379982045943,"score_spread":0.26496576607743144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W258557602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004362325,0.0052838656,0.0010387808,0.16296253,0.003950681,0.000028546823,0.00039964876,0.00010757842,0.82186604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43121314,0.006828383,0.0013034526,0.19285461,0.005283222,0.00027174837,0.00067470473,0.00022393995,0.3613468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99564314,0.0018674084,0.00015138254,0.0007978813,0.0007072805,0.00083296926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776185,0.00072457816,0.00022661776,0.00036444553,0.00059756153,0.00032501886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003099507,0.00049933366,0.00036412824,0.0009094922,0.008068942,0.008788819,0.0005513658,0.0034075335,0.047987852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005567488,0.00015688913,0.00041638652,0.0013698693,0.0071445103,0.005160833,0.005399505,0.0070892754,0.0062981243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011129084,0.000015596048,0.00046819975,0.000054068267,0.0000073812503,0.00007558025,0.0020061785,0.00006412235,0.000057174664,0.7669416,0.21333219,0.01696668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003899784,0.000004116154,0.0002668919,0.00007101839,0.0000017828326,0.00003077459,0.00053364027,0.00002775172,0.000040096005,0.0373389,0.9616774,0.0000037105121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076517626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008208494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047987852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052044727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059861294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16053534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588136974","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2016-082","title":"The Manitoba Basic Annual Income Experiment: Lessons Learned 40 Years Later","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Basic income; Cash; Economic inequality; Economics; Demographic economics; Public economics; Inequality; Finance","score_opus":0.049226133131697325,"score_gpt":0.32844060828813865,"score_spread":0.2792144751564413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588136974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36900398,0.019999184,0.011817426,0.32749858,0.00407311,0.0014146101,0.0038319672,0.00032941837,0.26203176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7814701,0.017269673,0.026968738,0.047698762,0.0009895788,0.002049405,0.0013800279,0.00030208638,0.12187153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993634,0.0039453204,0.000068105765,0.00058298965,0.001015573,0.0007539905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97990763,0.00985564,0.00049532886,0.0017782396,0.0063198507,0.0016433148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025656432,0.0005574365,0.00094831455,0.0005511514,0.0071552405,0.0029969194,0.002806585,0.0019387511,0.007328333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017514538,0.0003900234,0.00049138215,0.0016646786,0.006440708,0.0024642304,0.0018155852,0.0039289696,0.00072276336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034828046,0.0025812197,0.07723467,0.0010587064,0.00035894083,0.0013091014,0.069177076,0.0021595808,0.0038683163,0.3024849,0.26081243,0.27547234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064533344,0.000972276,0.16051795,0.001970202,0.0002930419,0.00017981532,0.047924265,0.0026411337,0.0030382338,0.059737865,0.72171205,0.00036777742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9234449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9596553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9588151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041184925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052630093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29881895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594053673","doi":"10.1057/s41308-018-0065-5","title":"Globalization and Social Change: Gender-Specific Effects of Trade Liberalization in Indonesia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IMF Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit Antwerpen; International Development Research Centre; Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg; Government of the United Kingdom; Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam; Universität Bielefeld; Department for International Development","keywords":"Economics; Tariff; Liberalization; Globalization; Free trade; Fertility; International economics; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Population; Market economy; Demography","score_opus":0.04807843142877055,"score_gpt":0.3094481925805769,"score_spread":0.2613697611518063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594053673","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087981425,0.8651892,0.000172507,0.017606389,0.0007754672,0.000012508479,0.00017867103,0.000004868807,0.02807898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36117148,0.63401353,0.00015840973,0.0013220598,0.00055846386,0.000019703348,0.0000850458,0.000007470763,0.0026637649],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946016,0.00024704429,0.000041462805,0.000049357055,0.00008545411,0.00011655933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926585,0.0003138695,0.00022416144,0.000020350142,0.00009792879,0.00007781309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010903011,0.0002618451,0.00043044423,0.0010448736,0.0006683841,0.0017150873,0.0003014751,0.0007007479,0.0030813813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013690008,0.00012465373,0.00033873846,0.0027117583,0.0014357496,0.0012977428,0.0010384554,0.0008315488,0.00017613512],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006064674,0.0004426119,0.08622489,0.014630005,0.0005177125,0.0012589123,0.016768146,0.002405697,0.0012568622,0.07277984,0.036689892,0.76641905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002824356,0.00019314117,0.6207333,0.011207498,0.00038872007,0.0007229293,0.026866935,0.00046923393,0.0005290658,0.01168064,0.32712832,0.000051894633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013885517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02492884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013885517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015768373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002943098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027609408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594599868","doi":"10.20547/jms.2014.1704102","title":"GSP Plus Status and Income Distribution: A CGE Model for Pakistan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Sciences","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computable general equilibrium; Income distribution; Distribution (mathematics); Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Macroeconomics; Inequality","score_opus":0.044776117208742715,"score_gpt":0.3560104108956639,"score_spread":0.3112342936869212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594599868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94640476,0.00026943642,0.021782408,0.0021740498,0.00008854737,0.00011119916,0.0049170656,0.00010882178,0.024143757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98748183,0.00018399529,0.004084546,0.00010677671,0.000021540533,0.00009430418,0.0013030687,0.000024310933,0.0066995425],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997162,0.000114745526,0.0000095559235,0.000051730025,0.000023192579,0.00008449789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982224,0.0011103613,0.0001607106,0.00006422501,0.00024693046,0.00019535128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090345065,0.0005007999,0.0007759912,0.0004993282,0.00085329084,0.0015066914,0.0015256382,0.001974542,0.010117872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028255403,0.00044139806,0.0009199822,0.0009531317,0.00089257734,0.0011705055,0.0012818883,0.0017842063,0.0005932774],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013971573,0.00008448502,0.0081348205,0.000024571025,0.000034792625,0.00025701724,0.00013095158,0.9741247,0.000093920025,0.013876636,0.001429827,0.0016684246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008959749,0.000051488372,0.0021620844,0.000009437942,0.000021961814,0.000030622235,0.00026031633,0.9931813,0.0000457067,0.0032640633,0.0008666042,0.000016872045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13798213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054835923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13798213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020450894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017400591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27435797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595030261","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.44.3.311","title":"Is Men’s Share of Housework Reduced by ‘Gender Deviance Neutralization'? Evidence From Seven Countries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deviance (statistics); Wife; Domestic violence; Gender role; Sociology; Psychology; Demographic economics; Gender studies; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Economics; Political science; Medicine; Law; Environmental health","score_opus":0.1450758763125767,"score_gpt":0.3833836817387344,"score_spread":0.23830780542615768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595030261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971085,0.0009460283,0.000057066078,0.00013408196,0.000009416976,0.0000069690113,0.00016495491,0.0000011062483,0.0015719009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939144,0.00032261052,0.000025240797,0.000045938446,0.0000042811434,0.0000028626744,0.00009501988,8.71539e-7,0.0001117697],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831307,0.000732585,0.00014966767,0.00027879677,0.0001731179,0.00035265804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940593,0.0016876078,0.003079754,0.00040957477,0.00041117053,0.0003526441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016044367,0.00034596075,0.0004310538,0.0011838023,0.00091257156,0.0010917942,0.0005138837,0.0004437886,0.0029858397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044578332,0.000454586,0.00062277424,0.0018689024,0.001798755,0.00068768143,0.0011446723,0.00051605946,0.0002819459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001389743,0.000037636182,0.9868063,0.000106476866,0.0001712466,0.00029487346,0.0052748146,0.00003643909,0.00013186225,0.00048491207,0.00020755686,0.006308973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008445931,0.0000758247,0.9902469,0.000060804497,0.000057978625,0.0001608318,0.008332262,0.000027957278,0.00008613165,0.00005000955,0.00088652706,0.0000064039573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03228878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027492411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03228878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041117414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046827964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06420171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595336389","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.40.3.355","title":"One Pot or Two Pot Strategies? Income Pooling in Married and Unmarried Households in Comparative Perspective","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Pooling; Institutionalisation; Demographic economics; Marital status; Economics; Perspective (graphical); Welfare; Economic growth; Sociology; Population; Geography; Political science; Demography","score_opus":0.14991232338358768,"score_gpt":0.41885016294086125,"score_spread":0.2689378395572736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595336389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996376,0.0006522488,0.000073499046,0.00015711949,0.0000037331554,0.0000015634329,0.000026561216,5.665387e-7,0.0027088406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999387,0.0003125034,0.000037762908,0.000022668779,0.000004667504,0.0000013462629,0.000015562278,3.6135586e-7,0.00021800071],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996284,0.00018663194,0.000012290004,0.00003688044,0.000031516553,0.00010430296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944395,0.00020080175,0.00017975959,0.000036626516,0.00003262305,0.0001062036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091680326,0.000103727136,0.00025327443,0.0009138803,0.0010478701,0.0011076127,0.00025947596,0.0003120682,0.0047612265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024232964,0.000107055566,0.00015885812,0.0012157573,0.0011655205,0.0018573338,0.0012230107,0.00022586017,0.00011467435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056262995,0.0003092854,0.7088326,0.00019884287,0.0002181524,0.0016362569,0.1552754,0.00038151644,0.0010993159,0.028756471,0.00094507885,0.10178449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014341605,0.00029588238,0.7737621,0.0001435891,0.000075019896,0.0007440611,0.21410269,0.0004813191,0.00035333948,0.0051870025,0.0048232977,0.000017415947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007414333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012122961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007414333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005185889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028201792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015927851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596278184","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.38.2.366","title":"Thistle, Susan. <b>FROM MARRIAGE TO THE MARKET: THE TRANSFORMATION OF WOMEN'S LIVES AND WORK</b>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thistle; Women's Lives; Work (physics); Gender studies; Sociology; Marriage market; Economics; Labour economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.057579458903687646,"score_gpt":0.3410648012550671,"score_spread":0.28348534235137945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596278184","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017171165,0.31231597,0.0005187921,0.6229132,0.015031552,0.00005075421,0.00049085676,0.00010672556,0.046855062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08016764,0.46936768,0.002391192,0.26568893,0.01313845,0.00047015224,0.00071516423,0.00037744845,0.16768329],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992126,0.00023951898,0.00006911224,0.00006935872,0.00030285024,0.00010663262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99470866,0.0022464565,0.00030676278,0.000087125416,0.0020832524,0.0005676574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013964868,0.00074516534,0.0004528901,0.0020627985,0.00701151,0.0035083331,0.0015059292,0.0055533494,0.02155664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052418243,0.0006740851,0.0003926975,0.0031211416,0.0029531198,0.009562158,0.0021958766,0.008139309,0.006273112],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014384314,0.000010469723,0.00037350107,0.00016118682,0.000002676743,0.000074175114,0.0035850205,0.00001733181,0.000050676168,0.004266391,0.9660108,0.025433552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002334371,0.000021134647,0.006556575,0.0021554339,0.00001846724,0.00019786239,0.016905034,0.00003812219,0.00020961127,0.006285401,0.96755904,0.000029943061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13945384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.320047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13945384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030891001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007855974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2772842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596440407","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.32.3.347","title":"Dual-Resident Marriages in Thailand: A Comparison of Two Cultural Groups of Women","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marital status; Cultural group selection; Dual (grammatical number); Agrarian society; Socioeconomics; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Demography; Population; Social psychology; Geography; Agriculture; Ethnic group; Anthropology","score_opus":0.10872201376979189,"score_gpt":0.41684321762959164,"score_spread":0.30812120385979974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596440407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996189,0.00006347713,0.000018431298,0.000024502386,0.000002635247,0.00000428613,0.000012020887,3.3528178e-7,0.0002553541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99934083,0.00023022863,0.000036602345,0.000040408675,0.0000045348693,0.000013953522,0.000037664955,9.773076e-7,0.0002948665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996486,0.00011384378,0.000028869328,0.00004176145,0.000053142492,0.00011381317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991689,0.00016791707,0.00018524965,0.000024304634,0.00009055725,0.00036322474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005087493,0.00027897465,0.00030413043,0.001132925,0.0023692474,0.001133536,0.00022753814,0.00035376896,0.002028307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015526111,0.00028266074,0.0002264851,0.000983321,0.0009619884,0.0008908721,0.0013779334,0.0005910018,0.00018453965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041448715,0.00030620277,0.76255685,0.00010402994,0.000054625576,0.0021203707,0.21552156,0.00004655085,0.0015211152,0.00036621085,0.00023548867,0.016752506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022386612,0.0007996025,0.43810117,0.00006552027,0.000036632355,0.0025218935,0.5562342,0.00019348065,0.00030934636,0.00017879502,0.0015070344,0.000030020203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0117664365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019361416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0117664365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000570195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007140682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023395896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596590837","doi":"","title":"Four perspectives on population policies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Environment and Pollution","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Economic growth; Blame; Sustainable development; Empowerment; Solidarity; Political science; Rhetoric; Development economics; Sociology; Political economy; Economics; Geography; Politics; Social psychology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.01589586534859593,"score_gpt":0.2725916292059188,"score_spread":0.25669576385732285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596590837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030248426,0.010101385,0.011954134,0.37668845,0.0017837217,0.000063183325,0.00018667152,0.000047607704,0.5689264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80855036,0.01965554,0.0074886363,0.07561392,0.0029178124,0.0005540867,0.00016613046,0.000111045745,0.08494255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99178725,0.00471297,0.0001869985,0.0005941369,0.001379306,0.0013393053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996597,0.0021399553,0.00026718454,0.000177996,0.0004224167,0.00039543654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008463323,0.00072603486,0.0004735958,0.0027541956,0.0054345387,0.0113248,0.0015068322,0.005839811,0.009302262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007850346,0.00034203916,0.00075699535,0.0030371868,0.015314255,0.008529865,0.008298836,0.007873611,0.00068771647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005483464,0.000012218827,0.00019539217,0.000026226691,0.0000020150924,0.000030485531,0.0017546475,0.00022896289,0.000024857323,0.992657,0.0020428814,0.0030198658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001834718,0.000026314705,0.0006716168,0.0004157659,0.000010018434,0.00007941921,0.010501198,0.0005289625,0.0002395964,0.65765107,0.3298337,0.000024042234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064224736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004394952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0113248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009984834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009071092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07244539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596987114","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.37.4.563","title":"The Ways of Adaptation and Allocation Work Time from Russian Households in the Period of Crisis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unpaid work; Work (physics); Time allocation; Russian federation; Demographic economics; Paid work; Economics; Adaptation (eye); Duration (music); Economic growth; Development economics; Labour economics; Economic policy; Working hours; Psychology","score_opus":0.10135641555652637,"score_gpt":0.31986818027122005,"score_spread":0.2185117647146937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596987114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99861073,0.00008702314,0.00008757646,0.00005223986,0.0000034082927,0.0000023246018,0.000060054812,8.1579253e-7,0.0010957811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952507,0.000062794374,0.000029885483,0.0000070291258,0.0000018393334,0.0000037822497,0.00004295067,7.897961e-7,0.00032605563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999566,0.00016114637,0.000020725443,0.000055444172,0.00004489886,0.0001517448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996333,0.000089669105,0.000111429,0.00003342312,0.00006114704,0.000071085255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005036286,0.00012213661,0.00015913267,0.0007811837,0.0008721527,0.0006309084,0.00021852461,0.00018229394,0.002223006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017180296,0.00010719214,0.0001803044,0.00083755073,0.0005283779,0.0004466512,0.0010004772,0.00022813444,0.00017259821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040975315,0.00004986519,0.872578,0.00004185293,0.000043314867,0.0004837963,0.0839918,0.00038250454,0.0017996997,0.002924592,0.00087196776,0.036422882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021773678,0.000034531255,0.93848693,0.000014468484,0.000008113963,0.00011910539,0.058284782,0.00018834762,0.00017160633,0.00032853294,0.0023544824,0.000006977218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014899041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018696284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014899041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079037005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040058108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029624641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598304869","doi":"10.1093/socpro/spw040","title":"Basic Income in a Small Town: Understanding the Elusive Effects on Work","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Problems","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Payment; Investment (military); Demographic economics; Low income; Economics; Basic income; Income Support; Labour economics; Sociology; Geography; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.05946459776852767,"score_gpt":0.2969334478664221,"score_spread":0.23746885009789445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598304869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98199826,0.00034824866,0.00048038634,0.0036490315,0.00004213439,0.00002320243,0.00005291958,0.000005461351,0.013400324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979803,0.00019645857,0.00015796536,0.00034543007,0.000017869146,0.000027928209,0.000015222422,0.0000055100527,0.0012533541],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772054,0.0014551475,0.000022254128,0.00016498048,0.00018671966,0.00045036964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99501824,0.0026454185,0.00046932546,0.00035635295,0.00032155617,0.0011890009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039340914,0.0002684767,0.00039461232,0.00084297,0.0049392297,0.0027828787,0.0012910075,0.0007236552,0.005428194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005967953,0.00027342458,0.0002940777,0.0006589376,0.011352227,0.00209345,0.0050411643,0.0017918342,0.00026150054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001371975,0.0025894481,0.43257397,0.0004982084,0.0001743617,0.0024263577,0.38589114,0.0013946262,0.00558424,0.08157532,0.0066124913,0.07930792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115090916,0.0009013706,0.6300055,0.00024965752,0.00007369598,0.00015117727,0.30771625,0.0008184632,0.0008820729,0.020789608,0.03824483,0.000052299958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06983173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12651052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06983173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052860705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030299544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13885051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598950602","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-51577-9_2","title":"Explaining the Low Rate of Female Labor Force Participation in the Middle East and North Africa","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Middle East; Islam; Fertility; Demographic economics; Panel data; Persistence (discontinuity); Total fertility rate; Economics; Geography; Development economics; Political science; Demography; Sociology; Population; Research methodology; Econometrics; Engineering; Family planning","score_opus":0.12620241772028798,"score_gpt":0.2886353748201152,"score_spread":0.16243295709982722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598950602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8293516,0.020051396,0.0018987312,0.026626552,0.00032028515,0.000023306753,0.00057481445,0.00002096377,0.12113229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860195,0.004348835,0.00027649428,0.00045202297,0.00006618463,0.000014326937,0.00006193485,0.000008966798,0.008751799],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997048,0.00010527784,0.0000067675237,0.000029524112,0.000024595261,0.00012910442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996561,0.00020817894,0.00006388492,0.0000099464005,0.000028569853,0.000033378998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067375146,0.00021472758,0.00018037524,0.00062766287,0.001525546,0.0012284208,0.00038313013,0.00050524727,0.007939165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021989138,0.000110831,0.00012984498,0.0012735915,0.0011870498,0.0010460907,0.00083614094,0.0005821338,0.00037651582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017475199,0.00006752484,0.27479076,0.000676614,0.000043693624,0.0031669734,0.23988052,0.001500428,0.0024385818,0.2552321,0.028739477,0.1932886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002143551,0.000047007456,0.50060475,0.001794633,0.000037651072,0.0013562086,0.25336325,0.0019857492,0.00088769844,0.07385175,0.16601086,0.000038996128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0520229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10613613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0520229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001244397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013710799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103440166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600774909","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.001","title":"The Development Benefits of Maternity Leave","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Developing country; Salary; Per capita; Infant mortality; Total fertility rate; Demographic economics; Economics; Child mortality; Developed country; Demography; Medicine; Family planning; Population; Economic growth; Environmental health","score_opus":0.04386247908025412,"score_gpt":0.2946431799296277,"score_spread":0.25078070084937354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600774909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7316611,0.0134180635,0.0008366746,0.059929203,0.00020338921,0.000023027478,0.0008358561,0.000028545774,0.19306412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99422413,0.0016691494,0.000079629666,0.00032853335,0.00007466838,0.0000043574723,0.000039022172,0.0000025507532,0.0035780154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915874,0.00033963888,0.000015186715,0.00003875875,0.00008848855,0.00035915122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796826,0.0006089584,0.0004134321,0.00009581836,0.00017750438,0.00073600956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010309956,0.0001503826,0.00020983508,0.000584265,0.0013410681,0.0014239914,0.0003310576,0.0008258994,0.014462239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004873912,0.00010551948,0.00021069152,0.0005864643,0.0015542663,0.0009643239,0.0018847253,0.0006586306,0.00037411897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00153473,0.0007500567,0.30764943,0.00040519075,0.00011756241,0.0026829548,0.011689732,0.0024203653,0.0022245296,0.36876494,0.013358824,0.28840175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013692478,0.00057641184,0.66643864,0.0007845599,0.00012564588,0.0015178141,0.034130186,0.0013870068,0.0011920716,0.11568888,0.17796704,0.000054783253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01185259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030007768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014462239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022139414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002343198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04838097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601038279","doi":"10.1086/711491","title":"The Cobb-Douglas Marriage Matching Function: Marriage Matching with Peer and Scale Effects","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); CobB; Population; Scale (ratio); Function (biology); Economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Geography; Statistics; Demography; Biology; Evolutionary biology; Cartography","score_opus":0.012409738276445583,"score_gpt":0.2453648973795955,"score_spread":0.2329551591031499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601038279","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29671007,0.001604724,0.6727254,0.0031911128,0.00023936108,0.0006255992,0.0020244524,0.0007919852,0.022087293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9325335,0.0009080715,0.040660243,0.00041759197,0.00023059016,0.00039009494,0.0008371381,0.00009757713,0.023925142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966972,0.0017633397,0.00010107353,0.0005629848,0.0003276963,0.000547693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99315757,0.0034937575,0.0011196776,0.0011358033,0.00065824395,0.00043493204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00731729,0.00091727107,0.0021078375,0.0018201642,0.0015946794,0.0020850147,0.003139357,0.002757111,0.015653506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025073836,0.0006693164,0.0020509767,0.0036996033,0.002197689,0.0031206328,0.0018275297,0.0018282649,0.0024308017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003526284,0.0003265886,0.0756103,0.00030073212,0.00044363615,0.00076158147,0.0009943653,0.18594414,0.0010645543,0.5754696,0.019268446,0.13946334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015085436,0.00018175646,0.027636679,0.00008597071,0.00018800574,0.00055047363,0.0005094376,0.6938386,0.00044407966,0.26274657,0.013560493,0.00010699217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036341704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0147346975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036341704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026188553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023009672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07226032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601409368","doi":"10.1257/aer.p20171098","title":"Economic Development and the Regulation of Morally Contentious Activities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Economics; Conceptual framework; Positive economics; Public economics; Development economics; Sociology; Social science; Biology; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.02869490209301646,"score_gpt":0.2939855542649852,"score_spread":0.26529065217196873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601409368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4379784,0.07301864,0.007937202,0.03623638,0.00033873876,0.00006937815,0.00019065577,0.000017167826,0.44421336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838802,0.012148046,0.0005045629,0.0006596616,0.000067577435,0.000021908698,0.000023309682,0.000004859245,0.0026898528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967374,0.0021295678,0.00009892248,0.00017430868,0.00042261765,0.00043706526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932922,0.0031367943,0.0022497512,0.00034023463,0.0005879258,0.00039306332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047825812,0.00016515565,0.00020415253,0.001184082,0.0012940605,0.0024943692,0.00046810534,0.0008330775,0.0028364516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072128912,0.00013843336,0.0002593936,0.0012059353,0.009716217,0.0015903519,0.0016270478,0.0010887396,0.00013612004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036243364,0.00008795139,0.021132587,0.00027118748,0.000047233036,0.00019254113,0.0042389077,0.0012541628,0.00035867316,0.924533,0.0030817657,0.044765674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059733273,0.0001065006,0.22212668,0.0021049576,0.000070794034,0.0006008221,0.016796816,0.0019044331,0.0011850458,0.47247556,0.28247964,0.00008901785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005492027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006119274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005492027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002961491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029407581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025293052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601496925","doi":"","title":"A Quarter Century of Changes in Labor Force Participation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multinomial logistic regression; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Government (linguistics); Private sector; Panel data; Economic growth; Geography; Econometrics","score_opus":0.05821139046471249,"score_gpt":0.3652457556201103,"score_spread":0.30703436515539784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601496925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.829547,0.047710314,0.0043605226,0.071916826,0.0020960602,0.00007328325,0.0064334096,0.00015564627,0.037706945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541796,0.017480278,0.0011547691,0.007641833,0.0012079115,0.000055984983,0.0016514909,0.00007345904,0.01655478],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988304,0.00024148892,0.000091159956,0.0004075524,0.00025877185,0.0001706547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672335,0.00090539455,0.00082035223,0.0004105749,0.0008284465,0.0003119848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024930264,0.00021817445,0.00032320624,0.0012731217,0.0006522894,0.0016162636,0.0004806084,0.0011224359,0.008323285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00683919,0.00022040874,0.00026677095,0.0027238426,0.0016669465,0.0017253886,0.0014989354,0.0020240548,0.0010694661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001114324,0.0002759607,0.26659095,0.0016259982,0.00031029168,0.0007669743,0.023096258,0.0017515146,0.0038622261,0.08332054,0.054618917,0.56266606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017725164,0.0001923466,0.59830606,0.00087032374,0.000028268683,0.00048911147,0.0091592595,0.0004181753,0.001135644,0.005989385,0.383331,0.00006272632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02016954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016017893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02016954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024229425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011291972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04010427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601838066","doi":"","title":"The Barriers to Economic Self-Reliance: An Ethnographic Study of Low-Income Single Mothers in Prince George's County Maryland","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ohio State University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"George (robot); Ethnography; Low income; Sociology; Geography; Socioeconomics; History; Anthropology","score_opus":0.006889624897114711,"score_gpt":0.22178499017036052,"score_spread":0.21489536527324582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601838066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998287,0.00017528367,0.00008627827,0.00054076506,0.000006539545,0.000021536287,0.00002637919,0.0000017676882,0.0008543675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714285,0.0007029608,0.00023384065,0.00041194615,0.000007419826,0.00006019481,0.000032543412,0.000006099373,0.0014021765],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989021,0.0006254901,0.000042779153,0.00008363444,0.000098709395,0.0002473037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809676,0.0010778302,0.0002642798,0.000056602534,0.00016558787,0.00033888692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017551633,0.00030105116,0.0004184078,0.0007209122,0.006548739,0.0023977149,0.0010078547,0.0006646154,0.0019036162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004270912,0.00066853984,0.00014624222,0.00075562164,0.0018651782,0.0016327634,0.0023373198,0.0013041116,0.00020477481],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018589071,0.00008084178,0.03237863,0.000057237678,0.000006363831,0.0012348732,0.9605797,0.000013405764,0.00048375697,0.00028858488,0.0006995269,0.0041585574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.970445e-7,0.000031371383,0.009247388,0.000058326983,0.0000038404833,0.00014068691,0.9886318,0.000024529623,0.00007274649,0.000030079902,0.0017548004,0.000003667639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06689483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16339079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06689483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023185671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031010217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13301092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604539924","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.41.1.19","title":"Is Justice Contextual? Married Women’s Perceptions of Fairness of the Division of Household Labor in 12 Nations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Distributive justice; Politics; Context (archaeology); Normative; Economic Justice; Economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.08951340579931076,"score_gpt":0.3715490063488895,"score_spread":0.2820356005495787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604539924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99790597,0.00013617815,0.00009997327,0.0002621615,0.000007342712,0.0000023478726,0.000009381661,4.533191e-7,0.0015762706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998216,0.000048021804,0.000020303229,0.000030956457,0.0000023403475,0.0000012665531,0.0000041248986,3.7291716e-7,0.00007106393],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687445,0.0021641564,0.00011153394,0.00019763087,0.00023377994,0.000418446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678886,0.0011787975,0.0012357857,0.00022467435,0.00019665527,0.0003752394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033359255,0.00010793299,0.00032964794,0.0005671808,0.0025784895,0.00221423,0.0002508912,0.00045307103,0.0014916011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011235456,0.0002010287,0.00019916965,0.0006364156,0.0034610282,0.0015662981,0.0023648997,0.00070487836,0.000063200445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033272168,0.00015171303,0.61763185,0.00005182883,0.000089949936,0.00037400628,0.34574893,0.0003096558,0.0011567984,0.010482735,0.00035417787,0.023315681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013012854,0.00019676736,0.54977524,0.00010404442,0.00003564412,0.00018177279,0.4397415,0.00034570484,0.00037720232,0.0046798917,0.004510932,0.000038333226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018426593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029379738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018426593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010401321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000832294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036638677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604872306","doi":"","title":"State's Stepping out of the Dominant Values in Women Empowerment Policy: The Experience of Andhra Pradesh, India","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Development Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Wage; Welfare; Empowerment; Poverty; Social security; Public policy; Welfare state; Economics; Social policy; Government (linguistics); Economic growth; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Development economics; Political science; Law; Politics; Market economy","score_opus":0.03366216429487405,"score_gpt":0.33435205132550283,"score_spread":0.30068988703062877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604872306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90936714,0.0024057252,0.0003382101,0.024982244,0.0002907766,0.00007080536,0.00007089827,0.000042784068,0.062431462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98740745,0.0012185859,0.00014152334,0.003321007,0.00005070362,0.000036954185,0.00002275342,0.000023533525,0.0077774366],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649316,0.0014703053,0.000084515304,0.00016864328,0.00038266514,0.0014007532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998393,0.0008020652,0.00017539025,0.0000782905,0.00010550682,0.00044572816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026845185,0.0003784611,0.00048230577,0.0008836911,0.02111386,0.0078069493,0.0014103841,0.001969954,0.005019185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025383038,0.00068052125,0.00034738355,0.0020251214,0.012710944,0.0033216702,0.008739367,0.006357709,0.0005121859],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006229656,0.00017902242,0.005391567,0.00022547423,0.000012445654,0.0023644115,0.9181207,0.000105810555,0.0010222361,0.049148656,0.0058647995,0.017502587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014422915,0.00011531406,0.010250653,0.00023438392,0.000018160741,0.00071523635,0.88870627,0.00009342222,0.00033693717,0.0023502556,0.09711742,0.000047493577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043835204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09354574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043835204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009391476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0110740345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08716011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606834453","doi":"10.7202/1034399ar","title":"Les politiques américaines contre la pauvreté : quelques propositions","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Community Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.054232456329954666,"score_gpt":0.3668089438962584,"score_spread":0.31257648756630374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606834453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07632583,0.2362712,0.020315042,0.17568257,0.0024085422,0.00009563016,0.0005230783,0.00011795354,0.4882602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8328338,0.10233065,0.01132824,0.011174952,0.0011709642,0.0002838143,0.00022977234,0.000054075244,0.04059369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981463,0.0008380041,0.000072298804,0.00027249946,0.000328936,0.0003419314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975789,0.0014410901,0.00046632378,0.00013998109,0.00023735406,0.00013640852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002800076,0.0005956446,0.0005436181,0.0014873956,0.0031198051,0.00412398,0.00051764137,0.0015869024,0.0059558693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038947633,0.00027065666,0.0004680815,0.0021155423,0.008813688,0.00422338,0.0025305059,0.0030476986,0.00041906847],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021196807,0.000038753766,0.0038728276,0.00040906944,0.00003853735,0.00016301309,0.009186077,0.0005840338,0.0002748246,0.931561,0.005163154,0.048687495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020321944,0.00007212571,0.023625256,0.002487967,0.000045871697,0.00041556696,0.011373484,0.00035751975,0.0006578639,0.21077316,0.75011194,0.000058990478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02958443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040398773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02958443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004203092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005879452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05882448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606839062","doi":"","title":"Child Poverty and Family Structure during the Recession in English-Speaking Liberal Welfare States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Recession; Welfare; Welfare reform; Demographic economics; Great recession; Welfare state; Development economics; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Labour economics","score_opus":0.008947034906659839,"score_gpt":0.2396441180678164,"score_spread":0.23069708316115656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606839062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993291,0.00004030644,0.000007414644,0.000097600256,0.0000010233209,0.0000017992758,0.00011831535,5.317807e-7,0.0004039185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993862,0.00007993319,0.000012420201,0.000046638444,0.0000016186247,0.000007304329,0.00018380643,0.0000013165941,0.0002807028],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999503,0.00011584322,0.000023489258,0.000041772342,0.000050792813,0.0002651594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853575,0.00017383821,0.00070014095,0.000049710296,0.0001839161,0.00035667553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078122166,0.00009901997,0.00023350157,0.00080254226,0.0011006744,0.00097350986,0.00031542726,0.00025633274,0.0013735847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027737247,0.00016688304,0.00022198819,0.0011396783,0.0007211208,0.0006492658,0.0017113,0.0006194743,0.00013798595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094449155,0.000049161757,0.98730916,0.000008960854,0.000024585674,0.00015286461,0.008554179,0.0001415395,0.00009528475,0.00020536997,0.0005346627,0.0028298127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001426673,0.00001293061,0.992282,0.000012796965,0.0000040275654,0.000023046932,0.0072710244,0.0000640065,0.000016494618,0.000026304411,0.00028292747,0.0000029928158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19662596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33919644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19662596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020809597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010321853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3909629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609425667","doi":"10.3138/9781442679795","title":"Set Adrift: Fishing Families","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fishing; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.03437105451196927,"score_gpt":0.2704879198691729,"score_spread":0.23611686535720366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609425667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008657507,0.036893886,0.00059657916,0.012239528,0.0019048078,0.00004103571,0.00019380469,0.000051896463,0.93942094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053080603,0.011961939,0.00038631324,0.0016622988,0.0001462795,0.000036149064,0.000109204855,0.000028426837,0.9325889],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982697,0.000027038877,0.000004314922,0.000020743511,0.00006521508,0.000055770404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998715,0.000025960955,0.00000595379,0.000007175124,0.00005143599,0.00003789445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023233921,0.0003572091,0.00013837476,0.00073388853,0.0061266795,0.0021463935,0.00054232066,0.00082191353,0.020256346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004268285,0.00022077658,0.000093227325,0.0010921073,0.0011705891,0.0014141,0.0009726737,0.001047672,0.0026827648],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001186062,0.000014812957,0.0010159643,0.00008229644,0.0000015260721,0.00048241302,0.014223503,0.00010914846,0.00024171715,0.14226142,0.7047277,0.13682765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012556352,0.0000040116884,0.001514329,0.00012494157,8.217203e-7,0.00017098768,0.0042888746,0.000024090961,0.00004822801,0.0025692822,0.9912493,0.0000039128686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4095443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6878845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4095443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007646514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004847422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8143209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609888406","doi":"","title":"How Much Does Work Matter for Inequality? Time, Money and Inequality in International Perspective","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Essex","keywords":"Inequality; Workforce; Distribution (mathematics); Demographic economics; Economics; Poverty; Income distribution; Economic inequality; Population; Work (physics); Labour economics; Economic growth; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.025672325743655713,"score_gpt":0.2870756224510407,"score_spread":0.261403296707385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609888406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6453804,0.01343399,0.0026754055,0.06273078,0.00044807582,0.000019646997,0.0009737306,0.000017286702,0.2743207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958175,0.0019420006,0.00009999417,0.00043558254,0.00017303365,0.0000049361097,0.00006106065,0.0000065072627,0.0014593556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999527,0.00017551429,0.000012778066,0.00004168007,0.000054917407,0.00018812505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989434,0.00039715078,0.00019756473,0.000057649115,0.00009008654,0.0003142878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056325266,0.00017138744,0.0003701651,0.0012060083,0.0012599971,0.0026895865,0.00020551439,0.0006030385,0.012778482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024058165,0.000067007524,0.00024707665,0.0020475404,0.0027059475,0.0033997404,0.001215293,0.0008675006,0.00031647252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027587404,0.00016852329,0.19687118,0.00019010517,0.00018272213,0.0005295102,0.019140383,0.0016176469,0.00041970157,0.648115,0.015056864,0.1174326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029632549,0.00013773117,0.52344215,0.0005363654,0.00011258747,0.00028854155,0.050929837,0.0016666705,0.00020352493,0.35783377,0.064780705,0.000038520444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073387856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009888889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012778482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011292063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049943983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042748332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610848160","doi":"","title":"Did Tax Cuts on Earned Income Reduce Welfare Participation in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Economics; Tax rate; Percentage point; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Point (geometry); Marginal utility; Income tax; Monetary economics; Public economics; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.016258684941674994,"score_gpt":0.29975946060942893,"score_spread":0.28350077566775395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610848160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98809695,0.0005915949,0.00009946079,0.0017799946,0.000019827894,0.000032499433,0.0026634785,0.000014767815,0.0067016003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995073,0.00032987862,0.00013227291,0.00016294225,0.0000038089604,0.000010252425,0.0007629925,0.000004383568,0.0035204692],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981584,0.00012088051,0.00003216677,0.0001363319,0.0003257129,0.0012265419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798006,0.00018151604,0.00029196232,0.00008391259,0.0008636701,0.0005988873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012719743,0.00026131835,0.00039112254,0.0008949021,0.003031084,0.0013145962,0.0013904461,0.00045378506,0.00289438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046317773,0.00019802836,0.00067022786,0.0018919026,0.00095590536,0.0003570588,0.0009882184,0.0007703372,0.00022592997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008853595,0.00023181734,0.9135167,0.000104146726,0.00016806209,0.00017616787,0.005173299,0.0033114166,0.00089243625,0.0060586575,0.009814795,0.05966728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003421077,0.00006199014,0.98489517,0.00006249081,0.000063280764,0.00002108505,0.0036422322,0.0017426425,0.00043926667,0.00028626606,0.008730285,0.000021085352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99845827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99913615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072542824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.072542824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10643191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5263375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611826962","doi":"10.3386/w23372","title":"Infant Mortality and the Repeal of Federal Prohibition","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Demography; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.3856745201903168,"score_gpt":0.5406530412975813,"score_spread":0.1549785211072645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611826962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99619126,0.00020002878,0.00013390675,0.0002140089,0.000011343679,0.0000033802776,0.0011232676,0.000005052802,0.0021177588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983907,0.0001158573,0.00005026647,0.000021203325,0.000012711425,0.00000463644,0.0007800138,0.0000019736672,0.0006226913],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994785,0.00017398046,0.0000319193,0.000078122794,0.00009282134,0.00014467281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697804,0.0005682822,0.001777596,0.00015344373,0.0002983915,0.00022423788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006667338,0.0000855551,0.00017080517,0.00067047833,0.00031968203,0.00037788766,0.00027198394,0.000219281,0.0019027485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00419201,0.0001222163,0.00025548486,0.00069199776,0.00032064138,0.000199284,0.00059695804,0.0006840677,0.00019004222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006441213,0.00002876878,0.99397284,0.000008193441,0.0000501055,0.00006876989,0.00024862034,0.00040654143,0.00023359661,0.0003143515,0.0004892523,0.004114505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010911184,0.000017820972,0.9988701,0.0000045562188,0.0000068075146,0.000019251693,0.00015145645,0.00013226959,0.00007971937,0.00002057431,0.00069413276,0.0000022456895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07264666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13472344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07264666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089411077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033446826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14444762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612030455","doi":"","title":"Educational Attainment and Family Gaps in Women's Wages: Evidence from Five Industrialized Countries","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Educational attainment; Developed country; Wage; Demographic economics; Developing country; Economics; Labour economics; Shock (circulatory); Population; Economic growth; Sociology; Demography; Medicine","score_opus":0.030760725946073448,"score_gpt":0.29433208917765563,"score_spread":0.2635713632315822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612030455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99711007,0.0009192914,0.000056348155,0.0001157577,0.0000044783055,0.000006482352,0.0004676358,0.000002007285,0.0013179254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99845994,0.00048444732,0.00003935557,0.000040275994,0.000005807455,0.00000634093,0.00076479296,0.0000012288656,0.00019787971],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999035,0.00033568172,0.00006299385,0.00014525616,0.00012221743,0.00029888767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953772,0.0013563553,0.0021875042,0.00028265044,0.0003899142,0.00040641928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016661959,0.00027760927,0.00052173325,0.003034221,0.0008774904,0.0009276655,0.00044845475,0.00036362943,0.0021247752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037597872,0.00023397827,0.00047165362,0.005039448,0.0010081409,0.0005392516,0.0016288015,0.0003814837,0.0002499817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114373,0.000044458277,0.99080384,0.000047929087,0.00009717972,0.0001700276,0.0024683066,0.000120512675,0.000055900702,0.00040354932,0.0003077927,0.0053661987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009133251,0.000044265857,0.99733174,0.000032899734,0.000030443678,0.000043066157,0.0017608313,0.00003326939,0.00003910795,0.00005349905,0.00061859906,0.0000031820848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053387366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0709765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053387366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056195416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004419515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10615325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616479857","doi":"10.3368/jhr.52.1.0714-6474r1","title":"Identifying Sibling Influence on Teenage Substance Use","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Human Resources","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Library science; Sociology; Gerontology; Economic history; Psychology; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.05810981155877511,"score_gpt":0.3158313499852112,"score_spread":0.2577215384264361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616479857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927941,0.00065599865,0.0002812944,0.0016031327,0.000048459766,0.000013314355,0.0008161108,0.000005439073,0.0037821613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953075,0.00058850594,0.00042806758,0.0001674322,0.000025385672,0.000025261055,0.0005876322,0.000006294959,0.0028639848],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990164,0.00044600118,0.000041978703,0.00014126433,0.00024459904,0.000109769964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99458003,0.0017418404,0.0013318148,0.0003640387,0.00068564777,0.0012965935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021662342,0.00020079709,0.00028360606,0.0010315394,0.0008987277,0.00064592314,0.0004318546,0.00045274833,0.005715308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012540149,0.00024000314,0.00032716326,0.0012462046,0.0002494893,0.00050767843,0.0009810929,0.0009739835,0.00041111474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015779526,0.000022360598,0.9932915,0.0000038236562,0.00003191357,0.00005018776,0.00044494242,0.000016729628,0.000042978576,0.00035715458,0.0010225938,0.004699939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070588653,0.00004885811,0.99447155,0.00003445116,0.00006874372,0.00013984548,0.0017555815,0.0004593681,0.00012102086,0.0006856233,0.0022023022,0.000005565653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05652471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0952593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05652471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009510421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011134391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11239135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617437151","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.05.009","title":"The impact of student debt on education, career, and marriage choices of female lawyers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Subsidy; Wage; Student debt; Economics; Promotion (chess); Labour economics; Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Finance; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04842993083372475,"score_gpt":0.3624111406487945,"score_spread":0.3139812098150697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617437151","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26320487,0.7227788,0.00008223748,0.007982486,0.00030661855,0.000006953828,0.00046470953,0.0000014799456,0.005171869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59564644,0.40087676,0.000050397903,0.0010226514,0.00056556857,0.000007836641,0.00043694835,0.0000038171547,0.0013896344],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989128,0.0006109512,0.00007775919,0.00006617387,0.0001466483,0.00018564142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946083,0.0033209869,0.0011446018,0.00008584399,0.00044951055,0.00039078502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028606933,0.00014628502,0.0006306388,0.0011640525,0.00034566506,0.0009690366,0.00045691634,0.00083237374,0.0037739591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008450452,0.00016144785,0.0006321444,0.0023445697,0.00053452194,0.00054823776,0.00073848764,0.0008927027,0.00027979078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022261967,0.00075369066,0.5046169,0.0049615665,0.0022676715,0.0005350273,0.00096110726,0.0009995525,0.00020585507,0.0064335978,0.016257916,0.45978084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059338276,0.0002984178,0.952919,0.0029267007,0.00082728075,0.00030796698,0.0017163616,0.00020416421,0.000078173616,0.0015627212,0.039077792,0.000022182525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01460238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029389424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01460238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009341478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001403725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029034793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619053719","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2017.1341242","title":"A tax dead on arrival: classical liberalism, inheritance, and social mobility","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Liberalism; Classical liberalism; Inequality; Social mobility; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.07988811400665848,"score_gpt":0.39213551185409085,"score_spread":0.3122473978474324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619053719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06992326,0.12906098,0.01966115,0.22852387,0.0018298086,0.000030137644,0.00007373137,0.000027953181,0.55086917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9321048,0.02969623,0.0019523745,0.0106749805,0.0018847152,0.000036474423,0.000022893324,0.000025171421,0.023602223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986702,0.00063355226,0.00002977646,0.0001637565,0.0003447063,0.0001580509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990445,0.0005500757,0.00011074855,0.00009302921,0.00011981399,0.00008180662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024822047,0.00021084303,0.00032522398,0.0012728209,0.0029383416,0.0040797614,0.00072385493,0.002293674,0.0020397245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002541666,0.00012752038,0.00025926056,0.0014303303,0.038473837,0.0059359213,0.0025005748,0.0039042467,0.00020481387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014539503,0.0000020567536,0.000048622154,0.000008195988,6.620064e-7,0.000009924611,0.00045004312,0.00005756776,0.000007711822,0.9969478,0.0006008173,0.00186507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030177391,0.0000051392744,0.00023266945,0.000121959325,0.000001395055,0.000027708988,0.00096174894,0.00015517867,0.000032692755,0.9488797,0.049574185,0.0000046469254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007292874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075769145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007347204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007347204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033790863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05330801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621295890","doi":"10.1111/obes.12175","title":"Is the Quarter of Birth Endogenous? New Evidence from Taiwan, the US, and Indonesia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Instrumental variable; Demography; Odds; Earnings; Census; Population; Sample (material); Demographic economics; Economics; Geography; Medicine; Logistic regression; Econometrics; Sociology","score_opus":0.038157863297274636,"score_gpt":0.2590234351663031,"score_spread":0.22086557186902847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621295890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99015325,0.0032188436,0.00059036876,0.0015386419,0.000066763154,0.000013785308,0.0009672527,0.0000066827142,0.0034444279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819946,0.0006341589,0.00007816298,0.00021427394,0.000031804175,0.000005901928,0.00047217341,0.0000051559773,0.00035889007],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981832,0.0008825891,0.0001557283,0.00031039963,0.00019877231,0.00026930362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688219,0.016579416,0.00903852,0.0026182358,0.0013796765,0.0015622755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004488583,0.00020243824,0.00062940636,0.0011117333,0.00063664396,0.0016606261,0.0009556959,0.0005199611,0.0042966045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014040221,0.0002167932,0.0009079942,0.0024476093,0.0009995197,0.0006414956,0.0014238817,0.0011824161,0.0003417921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001977388,0.000051613657,0.99154156,0.000057775564,0.00039156838,0.00032755316,0.00074307545,0.0001593597,0.0000703542,0.0006765456,0.00067380077,0.0051090973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017828052,0.000045577573,0.9924971,0.000115093666,0.00045330854,0.00010829232,0.0029905885,0.00095601403,0.00015012275,0.00056944834,0.0020826228,0.00001401442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053602282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037384946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053602282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063551794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007461641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106580555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624580232","doi":"10.1177/2321022217696152","title":"Efficiency of Family Bargaining Models with Renegotiation: The Role of Transferable Utility across Periods","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Microeconomics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Technische Universität Dresden","keywords":"Inefficiency; Economics; Substitution (logic); Constant (computer programming); Microeconomics; Wage; Econometrics; Marginal cost; Marginal utility; Labour economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06024482054666278,"score_gpt":0.34102020002727207,"score_spread":0.28077537948060927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624580232","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15186714,0.0006869509,0.81019413,0.001577286,0.000070248025,0.0001695913,0.00021959117,0.0001625518,0.035052538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416348,0.00088771957,0.043301996,0.00026788856,0.000092312584,0.00030384277,0.00012168075,0.00014371336,0.013246153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938512,0.0039996277,0.00018460953,0.00069183833,0.00038846993,0.00088428875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981307,0.013207899,0.0022987814,0.0021854204,0.00040360552,0.0005973142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014509558,0.0011268208,0.0025224139,0.00093283155,0.0014766529,0.0038310238,0.0032590602,0.002646465,0.009272717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03236422,0.0009471154,0.002379055,0.0013454875,0.0044250092,0.007559019,0.0027383284,0.0031877263,0.0010859552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023731406,0.00011924926,0.0017549739,0.000079896025,0.000116784955,0.00017488615,0.0006040464,0.30761367,0.0007335158,0.67521024,0.0011166724,0.012238736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079929174,0.000067460314,0.00045940737,0.000028209126,0.000043787044,0.00008968322,0.00020495105,0.30897295,0.00028602127,0.6880313,0.0016991139,0.00003724724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024197511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013265003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014509558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028507973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018143791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07673478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625735230","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-51149-8_4","title":"A Feminist View of Women and Development","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Wish; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychology; Art; Anthropology","score_opus":0.039842777216707946,"score_gpt":0.283040488093604,"score_spread":0.24319771087689604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625735230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002005852,0.04985976,0.001991729,0.026366957,0.0011842644,0.000011456336,0.00006278922,0.000020868385,0.9184964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15510814,0.06733073,0.0022810015,0.010983079,0.002353287,0.00013936908,0.00009534468,0.00011234049,0.76159674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996468,0.00019048655,0.000005116484,0.000031770258,0.0000813463,0.00004444687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997627,0.00015246971,0.000012832388,0.000013515251,0.000028941326,0.000029520248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053718034,0.0005500464,0.00028979898,0.00072503515,0.0026475263,0.0031281998,0.00056863524,0.0012536497,0.014899103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006981192,0.00014379526,0.00013264532,0.0009569511,0.009824228,0.002384304,0.0013593134,0.002964662,0.0016804385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043990585,0.000009044308,0.000056920482,0.000029974739,8.6711947e-7,0.000027997196,0.0029120084,0.000055062992,0.00004875548,0.94995004,0.035052672,0.011852245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002848374,0.0000049208634,0.00018448486,0.00018360832,0.0000011845547,0.000053981832,0.0025909957,0.000043824475,0.00006073938,0.18960416,0.8072665,0.000002761963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00716937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0183018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014899103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031014094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032430813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049842477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W262929796","doi":"","title":"CRDCN Synthesis Series / Série Synthèses du RCCDR","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Wage; Gender gap; Demographic economics; Economics; Labour economics; Gender pay gap; Sociology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.018041999973537035,"score_gpt":0.21904276415967308,"score_spread":0.20100076418613605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W262929796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015759848,0.3846047,0.010338299,0.022288684,0.05273293,0.0021564942,0.039854843,0.00059833727,0.48584977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040525023,0.6352683,0.026512526,0.011116253,0.022274718,0.010464954,0.03834443,0.0013318433,0.21416202],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994443,0.0024221085,0.0006425735,0.00058302155,0.001689559,0.0002197945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820419,0.008125829,0.0011542095,0.00218494,0.0061591486,0.00033402684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008322647,0.0011696545,0.0014773583,0.012917919,0.0016478113,0.0058282455,0.0018861297,0.0011464297,0.15659963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031601164,0.0006110106,0.0012209691,0.018788517,0.0014555715,0.002805942,0.0026477077,0.0022139982,0.028900735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016558745,0.00005689003,0.0002943415,0.0211251,0.000098298835,0.00008167638,0.0013742007,0.00058874587,0.00021324375,0.08661338,0.6791311,0.21025756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010652324,0.000008135367,0.00038262169,0.010568213,0.000023119634,0.000019409415,0.00036363257,0.00003033925,0.00009100191,0.0018836632,0.98661244,0.0000067367496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024238858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020087594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15659963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008963817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012333451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.523878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2644506046","doi":"","title":"Key Concepts in Family Studies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Sociology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.1564576723535299,"score_gpt":0.4271016098192512,"score_spread":0.27064393746572135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2644506046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014796304,0.34087688,0.046890657,0.14585453,0.008582652,0.000293908,0.00075566093,0.00014139878,0.44180807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61106825,0.24984744,0.036385037,0.02049321,0.02309757,0.0025555207,0.0007147337,0.00018581784,0.055652425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964342,0.0027502733,0.00010666163,0.00030476664,0.00025897962,0.00014509648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99108267,0.0073951534,0.00033614074,0.00044627368,0.00035718613,0.0003826661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056970706,0.00092444546,0.0012228837,0.0044044727,0.00484366,0.005321442,0.0020885766,0.003521661,0.019861838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010934517,0.0003249339,0.00043881836,0.008150727,0.020109959,0.009428858,0.002950839,0.0049315253,0.001631138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049066894,0.000012717618,0.0001689666,0.00010585242,0.0000021293704,0.000038045724,0.0027017298,0.000051750416,0.000017458216,0.98090494,0.00791535,0.008076077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011392149,0.000013568008,0.0005605533,0.00050490245,0.000003917134,0.00018461671,0.0035700835,0.000113155045,0.000022494136,0.8183128,0.17669496,0.000007560533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003922917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002168442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019861838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037363144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002965759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066444516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2699937900","doi":"10.1111/jomf.12421","title":"Comparing Child Poverty Risk by Family Structure During the 2008 Recession","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marriage and the Family","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Recession; Poverty; Demographic economics; Welfare; Child poverty; Economics; Great recession; Development economics; Economic growth; Labour economics","score_opus":0.011977492842399143,"score_gpt":0.2523436564784774,"score_spread":0.24036616363607827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2699937900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99925226,0.00006595665,0.000017875836,0.00003161675,0.0000010268965,0.0000023820337,0.00035757196,7.8540046e-7,0.0002704026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984836,0.00012841803,0.000036152156,0.000015788752,0.0000019486831,0.000007943233,0.00107849,0.0000017835216,0.00024599317],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995264,0.00008560905,0.000029759387,0.0000607702,0.0000637424,0.00023377722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986528,0.0001909141,0.00071341934,0.000061653715,0.00017508221,0.00020606622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064945675,0.00016058562,0.00024656998,0.0010055125,0.0005914862,0.00054094894,0.00033375827,0.0003200373,0.0009136887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021183304,0.00018151102,0.00042828702,0.0011724209,0.0002878568,0.00046282963,0.0010637809,0.0004389181,0.00012133751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009626749,0.000019238612,0.9976186,0.000004499602,0.00003576957,0.000030827243,0.00034389796,0.000106081236,0.000046699275,0.000043561693,0.00017281529,0.0014817029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.647165e-7,0.000016024711,0.99918157,0.0000037239154,0.0000053908548,0.000019866935,0.00058997713,0.00005561446,0.000015017716,0.000007746479,0.000102626684,0.0000014929302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10470475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19360721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10470475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010180643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000515543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20819056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2724840142","doi":"10.5539/mas.v11n8p7","title":"An Analysis of the Socio-Demographic Differences in Ecuadorian Economically Active Population between Genders","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of the Aegean; Universidad Politécnica Salesiana del Ecuador","keywords":"Poverty; Equity (law); Gender equity; Population; Socioeconomic status; Poverty level; Economic growth; Work (physics); Perception; Demographic economics; Socioeconomics; Geography; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.03434521816160976,"score_gpt":0.29737727588683915,"score_spread":0.2630320577252294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2724840142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998623,0.00014191816,0.00005946977,0.00006866165,0.0000027928277,0.000009203408,0.00011550669,6.367064e-7,0.0009787396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990771,0.0001487255,0.000069151974,0.000032618635,0.0000035452824,0.00002760412,0.000108522436,4.970182e-7,0.0005321719],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982786,0.000050967825,0.000015219075,0.000023992568,0.000026579572,0.00005527621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972874,0.00009150258,0.00007088238,0.000010124351,0.000058293852,0.000040409945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037846432,0.000120306475,0.00011895051,0.000967185,0.0006250717,0.0004839893,0.00017530425,0.000150371,0.0030450833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011233815,0.000060641112,0.00011570014,0.00073281507,0.00024056397,0.00038837755,0.00040869246,0.00013520094,0.00015041],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014307362,0.0001698944,0.8959162,0.000116978816,0.000022423974,0.0008554453,0.06574,0.000048975708,0.0015483348,0.000989322,0.000873126,0.03357618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019172921,0.00010313417,0.892879,0.00003869782,0.000008571224,0.00022967038,0.10345212,0.00007881785,0.00019333213,0.00011749662,0.002891893,0.0000053810622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008693441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011772804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008693441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045703203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002620931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017285645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735442608","doi":"10.1016/j.labeco.2017.05.004","title":"Women make houses, women make homes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Labour economics; Work (physics); Instrumental variable; Term (time); Fertility; Demographic economics; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.020901428364896068,"score_gpt":0.2558550384071622,"score_spread":0.23495361004226617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735442608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49483147,0.0077657267,0.004608735,0.032593176,0.0011207431,0.0000590627,0.0010376918,0.00006343419,0.45791996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95121586,0.0027489725,0.0008550676,0.0013494068,0.00013092707,0.000017597951,0.0000959514,0.000014272624,0.04357185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934465,0.00025087,0.000019023919,0.00007203159,0.00013507932,0.00017829314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991585,0.00020063472,0.00025526158,0.00005859839,0.00008217888,0.0002447783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077614834,0.00017965453,0.00018157004,0.00055667805,0.0018701828,0.0032547398,0.00033801215,0.000671964,0.029247561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023585598,0.00013460318,0.00015617479,0.0011314842,0.0025133672,0.003003876,0.0010939847,0.0005999237,0.0019632576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002616354,0.0002451954,0.14703986,0.0003811212,0.00009150006,0.00062850286,0.024302484,0.000553317,0.0013454024,0.61742765,0.04454621,0.16317715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006767049,0.00021289595,0.15866709,0.00059313246,0.00007102019,0.0008114397,0.14149885,0.00036421977,0.0014691094,0.17068344,0.5255212,0.000039995513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010878505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034447357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029247561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009958725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012113474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09784281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736014628","doi":"10.25336/p6r60w","title":"Handbook of Research on Gender and Economic Life","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.2569004138907278,"score_gpt":0.44839863925300194,"score_spread":0.19149822536227412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736014628","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021509372,0.915121,0.00049291254,0.005785877,0.0058079986,0.000047202215,0.0011250711,0.00009342233,0.071311265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002077742,0.84320074,0.0009501934,0.002471759,0.002557156,0.00006225351,0.0011901938,0.00011048825,0.14737952],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985306,0.0001059284,0.000060269387,0.00008288156,0.0010701502,0.00015015328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967744,0.00083394395,0.00012505986,0.00009991516,0.0019012387,0.00026558674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015103971,0.0012400617,0.0024311752,0.0104419915,0.0020619456,0.0048300815,0.002604182,0.0013814843,0.06008219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040059816,0.0005963501,0.0007125801,0.024361098,0.0018810226,0.002285021,0.0010934873,0.0017500327,0.01570996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018282914,0.000022984852,0.0001367575,0.0019481133,0.000012848349,0.000035434852,0.00021026343,0.00012973377,0.00010152492,0.007971383,0.80722886,0.1821837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024125345,0.0000049467026,0.00059416477,0.0012828648,0.0000084004805,0.000042399184,0.00012070873,0.000014984191,0.000018975457,0.001160792,0.99674183,0.000007413002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46766093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63379586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46766093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014370715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036333907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9298777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737155383","doi":"10.1007/s11150-017-9399-4","title":"Returns to scale in food preparation and the Deaton–Paxson puzzle","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Essex; McMaster University","keywords":"Economics; Scale (ratio); Returns to scale; Food preparation; Politics; Food processing; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Food science; Chemistry; Physics","score_opus":0.043528550114557286,"score_gpt":0.2930200108019808,"score_spread":0.24949146068742353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737155383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6408981,0.032857534,0.076061904,0.0680931,0.00049367634,0.00011471993,0.0010486826,0.00024386008,0.1801884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800394,0.0055503473,0.003596086,0.0018113548,0.0004667041,0.000073552066,0.00013137769,0.000040222338,0.008290899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990011,0.00032648194,0.00004833562,0.00029616672,0.00015670573,0.00017119657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99096924,0.004891302,0.00214349,0.0013171271,0.00032339504,0.00035539173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029973597,0.00046616592,0.00092635304,0.0008411759,0.0011272685,0.002616378,0.0010027078,0.0019945474,0.011005004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011840321,0.00029941218,0.0010765827,0.0016028968,0.005136238,0.0054495824,0.0022269452,0.0022371002,0.00079264364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026554987,0.0000938594,0.010911821,0.00015507005,0.00008183878,0.000500356,0.0005532118,0.007062507,0.00077618187,0.92057186,0.0042838007,0.054744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050503233,0.00005711142,0.015193982,0.00005486457,0.000021167856,0.00019476832,0.00037201037,0.0031353312,0.00027277012,0.9622498,0.018371202,0.000026435606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025569093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016003477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011005004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00195389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043000828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036815464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739673893","doi":"10.3386/w23636","title":"Hours, Occupations, and Gender Differences in Labor Market Outcomes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.3907567157579422,"score_gpt":0.5301811496742411,"score_spread":0.13942443391629894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739673893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926858,0.00023116251,0.00084370543,0.00029194352,0.000015053548,0.000010093682,0.0014424026,0.000014930503,0.0044648857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99815947,0.00007812289,0.00014654329,0.000038700233,0.000011359297,0.0000074243953,0.00061580195,0.0000038146723,0.0009387858],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970645,0.00008319928,0.000017354902,0.000060018738,0.00006888024,0.000064019645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618846,0.0016686339,0.0013242743,0.00027103414,0.00015407443,0.00039358716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011495053,0.00017774836,0.00024655068,0.00054779195,0.00021450536,0.00067165,0.0002740311,0.00034267234,0.0073044198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054851864,0.00011352759,0.0002534143,0.0005751744,0.00035724248,0.00032972556,0.00047727436,0.0003705743,0.00078306923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021487626,0.00015075729,0.97971296,0.000023120261,0.000067599314,0.0001259102,0.0003570403,0.0037169943,0.0007267555,0.0032681567,0.0019121681,0.0097237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000936607,0.00005164773,0.99194825,0.000011325318,0.000014409508,0.0000696244,0.00030304812,0.0038464095,0.00016010672,0.0027915535,0.00078748015,0.000006838243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053554317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007426032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073044198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003238904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028783426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024435759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741666373","doi":"10.1515/rebs-2017-0047","title":"Female Labor Force Participation Rate and Economic Growth in the Framework of Kuznets Curve: Evidence from Turkey","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic and Business Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Economics; Context (archaeology); Kuznets curve; Error correction model; Econometrics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Test (biology); Labour economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.08742578701206015,"score_gpt":0.37566445027367834,"score_spread":0.2882386632616182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741666373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99521846,0.0017300437,0.00018795778,0.00021060133,0.000012638983,0.0000039814267,0.00027483495,0.0000048626976,0.00235648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99911064,0.0005427981,0.00003293981,0.000010833638,0.000007779592,0.0000014726545,0.00018169031,0.0000014618382,0.00011044241],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994881,0.00015751061,0.000038251324,0.0001064672,0.00009920825,0.00011042251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982591,0.0007290214,0.0005412176,0.00008501931,0.0002645485,0.000121094636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086221704,0.00031738894,0.00042279458,0.0016858837,0.0002887512,0.0007385925,0.0003513259,0.00026918412,0.0024438691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00204431,0.00011320674,0.00043964235,0.002267186,0.0005769812,0.0005291891,0.0005842561,0.00042305194,0.00027472613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025161024,0.000092055874,0.9671049,0.00014806929,0.00017676961,0.0010235793,0.0011375723,0.0023480952,0.00025024646,0.003772288,0.0010129933,0.022681868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006751709,0.00007743963,0.99205256,0.000079829275,0.00006186503,0.00019186737,0.0029055432,0.0018452023,0.00013973433,0.0004678519,0.0021605357,0.0000107757505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017678821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010470232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017678821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075416523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065157557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03515184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W274311584","doi":"","title":"Do Child Tax Benefits Affect the Wellbeing of Children? Evidence from Canadian Child Benefit Expansions. NBER Working Paper No. 14624.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Economics; Child mortality; Developing country; Developmental psychology; Public economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.12842783295725865,"score_gpt":0.3872024734209468,"score_spread":0.25877464046368814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W274311584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7152257,0.1221263,0.00028754678,0.037324693,0.00039683876,0.00016529059,0.072242714,0.000031457395,0.052199524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94254595,0.041131623,0.00016574313,0.0017128519,0.00009830768,0.000043759104,0.007918965,0.000014390999,0.0063684396],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787843,0.0003333501,0.00010219281,0.00017506094,0.0006931204,0.0008178789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98180884,0.005251626,0.0054884306,0.00071186275,0.0047162175,0.0020229972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003180442,0.00047596885,0.00075625227,0.0017587176,0.0023952082,0.0019103906,0.002007605,0.0013189832,0.011976571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015853915,0.00042983697,0.0010787109,0.004796359,0.0017820649,0.0007935904,0.0015538948,0.0020826755,0.00062284607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016254022,0.00023146512,0.90380305,0.00067435036,0.0011800134,0.0003983149,0.0019630883,0.0007559355,0.00013433478,0.0052414783,0.03974786,0.044244807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007650572,0.00005407088,0.9846933,0.0003937026,0.00069117587,0.000041975483,0.0014209566,0.00008530322,0.00009813556,0.000324671,0.012098806,0.00002140286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9829437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017056286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014795246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021814449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10734749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744543129","doi":"10.25336/p6489d","title":"Income management strategies of older couples in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Allocative efficiency; Demographic economics; Educational attainment; Economics; Psychology; Sociology; Economic growth; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03670166205852248,"score_gpt":0.3095935938467382,"score_spread":0.2728919317882157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744543129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963431,0.0005526458,0.000054033546,0.0002635999,0.000006592151,0.000020115864,0.00029422683,0.0000026978717,0.0024629792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979253,0.00066322484,0.0001521924,0.00008342287,0.0000025449149,0.0000074505247,0.00023745006,0.0000013766061,0.0009270702],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993849,0.00007326907,0.000031335963,0.00005145942,0.00022078925,0.00023824182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990533,0.00006283229,0.00024218543,0.000025910436,0.0003462559,0.0002694656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075731886,0.00017473951,0.0002148607,0.0011524168,0.0038583842,0.0010762146,0.00049099687,0.00025319788,0.0013956651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002373727,0.00015982626,0.000308931,0.002397268,0.00057922764,0.00036158282,0.00094438414,0.00038254054,0.000091830254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008402678,0.00006737866,0.9246263,0.000048066235,0.000039411563,0.00021725659,0.026284942,0.00016705526,0.00043449723,0.0007788405,0.0015437847,0.045708433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055790742,0.000035662943,0.9678306,0.000044836026,0.000017932896,0.00010037725,0.026872875,0.00023841446,0.00009639386,0.00011081077,0.004624909,0.000021639064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98177415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99045885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018225849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014987643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017809294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10874343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744923459","doi":"10.11575/prism/30062","title":"Policy Options for Federal Disability Programs - The Disability Tax Credit (DTC) Improving Accessibility for Adults with Cystic Fibrosis (CF)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Disability insurance; Tax credit; Disability benefits; Medicine; Public economics; Political science; Economics; Social security","score_opus":0.041909220571718,"score_gpt":0.3470177407442649,"score_spread":0.30510852017254686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744923459","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03414756,0.0026484092,0.0031059901,0.73920333,0.0019672092,0.00034305107,0.0007200609,0.00015750623,0.2177069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63667065,0.0037087097,0.012764122,0.2116391,0.0007923323,0.0005560582,0.00072530546,0.0000673918,0.13307631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916824,0.0017049214,0.00015995899,0.0003662947,0.0018257292,0.0042606047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99159044,0.0019946238,0.00034471223,0.00029587976,0.0022230383,0.003551426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070373965,0.00037751536,0.00031313096,0.0015478175,0.013500099,0.007521323,0.0025986715,0.010309001,0.015558438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015789526,0.0002576318,0.0008034154,0.0012266927,0.0043752417,0.003747704,0.0039318237,0.0045700367,0.0011129795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006426868,0.00014108028,0.005576807,0.00013055187,0.000013437175,0.00034955275,0.007870238,0.0007212294,0.00066520076,0.7161791,0.22388455,0.04440416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006170652,0.00008374889,0.012688405,0.00071727776,0.0000336153,0.0001895789,0.020635972,0.0007958592,0.00046671668,0.0426974,0.92149466,0.0001351223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8647346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9280903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13526541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041862763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16166106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30373704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749549974","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.08.002","title":"Income and the mental health of Canadian mothers: Evidence from the Universal Child Care Benefit","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSM - Population Health","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Dalhousie University; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Mental health; Psychology; Sample (material); Developmental psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Environmental health; Population","score_opus":0.034193868756516956,"score_gpt":0.32168040475676446,"score_spread":0.2874865360002475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749549974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9427543,0.014616855,0.0002374099,0.009335577,0.00016597149,0.00013731311,0.011569453,0.000022130735,0.021161003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887251,0.0053741694,0.00020433626,0.00070175616,0.000043115626,0.000035812867,0.0023907814,0.000010147616,0.0025146196],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972541,0.00040342702,0.000105279585,0.00032556895,0.0010072389,0.0009043368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926575,0.0014521728,0.0017810907,0.0005564568,0.0025548798,0.0009980323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029499345,0.00050678855,0.0006751325,0.0014823377,0.004111477,0.0015426978,0.0021313427,0.0007186277,0.0053911447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013287041,0.00034941046,0.0012102079,0.0035948628,0.0015946287,0.00045475957,0.0020499073,0.0010800152,0.0002551954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049759017,0.00015436161,0.94971293,0.00033657736,0.00062413514,0.00024985042,0.00304042,0.00037165987,0.00009138342,0.0027689373,0.009783318,0.032368883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050858114,0.000041101437,0.9912258,0.0001882155,0.00035243135,0.000027145521,0.0019013652,0.00025641994,0.00006979625,0.00017646325,0.005689555,0.000020757925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9970571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99616975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03305844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03305844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048507225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23985684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749976532","doi":"10.1007/s10797-020-09619-0","title":"Frictions and taxpayer responses: evidence from bunching at personal tax thresholds","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Tax and Public Finance","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; European Research Council; Nuffield Foundation","keywords":"Taxpayer; Economics; Public finance; Labour economics; Wage; Social security; Work (physics); Tax rate; Exploit; Schedule; Quarter (Canadian coin); Income tax; Demographic economics; Monetary economics; Public economics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.0593976641299807,"score_gpt":0.3010693644895882,"score_spread":0.2416717003596075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749976532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99801373,0.00008413932,0.0001395085,0.00011507931,0.0000037742911,0.000011148812,0.00026111535,0.0000044221943,0.0013671339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992613,0.00003742733,0.00003516438,0.000026939619,0.0000029979703,0.000007666611,0.00016592562,0.000001467788,0.00046113867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978011,0.0007853373,0.00019557803,0.00038418116,0.0003343839,0.0004993801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97475684,0.007194119,0.012985748,0.0024939242,0.0009145092,0.0016549692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024770764,0.00014839761,0.00048239893,0.0010943199,0.0006656706,0.0011279634,0.00044597196,0.00086271175,0.0070500732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020427752,0.0002716491,0.00025304005,0.0016888637,0.0009385886,0.0008296453,0.0015880573,0.00081549847,0.0010584242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037693573,0.00012562121,0.9854371,0.000026261716,0.00005255082,0.00010393468,0.0029148231,0.000502302,0.00027366407,0.00057252025,0.0008488183,0.00876541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008119276,0.00008448087,0.99583733,0.000013609018,0.000007871978,0.000037036745,0.002244041,0.00050268834,0.00008168543,0.00037024476,0.00080225256,0.000010648429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016766567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013633289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016766567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007037494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000341965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03333795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752323470","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.48.1.67","title":"The Impact of Family Change on Income Poverty in Colombia and Peru","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Cohabitation; Economics; Development economics; Demographic economics; Developing country; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.18746392539896337,"score_gpt":0.4400657521227221,"score_spread":0.25260182672375875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752323470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99663156,0.00080349285,0.000030581683,0.00027280356,0.000003548652,0.000004592306,0.00027280097,0.0000026198006,0.0019778814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933404,0.00028906562,0.00002660384,0.000014894482,0.0000020170644,0.0000046025807,0.00012040606,9.1496196e-7,0.00020735312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996779,0.00010410857,0.000009520773,0.000033410113,0.000031717635,0.00014341902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990646,0.00020778649,0.00040486312,0.000030962237,0.0001443566,0.00014753504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040340464,0.00015912205,0.00020838797,0.0011290503,0.0010503037,0.0008893759,0.0003424119,0.00034182612,0.0023724153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023676036,0.00009476694,0.0002667669,0.0011717745,0.00054026744,0.0006437089,0.0012346474,0.00042828135,0.00008962172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014818559,0.00007926283,0.9739525,0.00007977988,0.000076467244,0.0006675551,0.0076127443,0.00041385926,0.0002685911,0.0005431593,0.00076885405,0.015389112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017314779,0.00002563645,0.9905083,0.000021640948,0.000012291673,0.000089460205,0.008373501,0.000105908766,0.000041052695,0.000055253087,0.0007613547,0.000003893813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14275634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21070348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14275634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023679268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007228391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2838508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755212620","doi":"10.24839/1089-4136.jn16.3.134","title":"Conceptualizing Fatherhood: Maternal Perceptions of Responsible Fathering","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Developmental psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.332000909263908,"score_gpt":0.49524615557293394,"score_spread":0.16324524630902593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755212620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744033,0.0019291003,0.0010053336,0.0056356443,0.000114041446,0.00002184771,0.000023994327,0.000008120781,0.016858533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981509,0.0007155308,0.00018979762,0.0002040796,0.000008578619,0.0000114954555,0.000010179806,0.0000035162623,0.0007058383],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99490696,0.0036729972,0.00013753852,0.0002618442,0.0005371408,0.00048338683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898078,0.0053699557,0.0022321043,0.00039683993,0.00080751354,0.0013857621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080427425,0.00046183867,0.0004138736,0.00089934136,0.004479579,0.004436054,0.00089562073,0.0008499738,0.0027352064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01706631,0.0005324404,0.0003220838,0.00057361415,0.0061177397,0.0034021,0.0036182266,0.0026082539,0.00026431066],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034611054,0.00010035337,0.07567091,0.000057873127,0.000018239352,0.00073302595,0.90098554,0.00006426095,0.00041377437,0.012040052,0.0010080233,0.008873224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008459068,0.00007719619,0.029661706,0.00017565559,0.000020211211,0.0005330069,0.9574004,0.0002831923,0.00016265437,0.0034932184,0.008162654,0.000021725235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006684865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00891183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0080427425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002199616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026788537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04253459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761565494","doi":"10.3386/w23918","title":"Long-Term Care Insurance: Knowledge Barriers, Risk Perception and Adverse Selection","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"HEC Montréal; KU Leuven","keywords":"Adverse selection; Term (time); Selection (genetic algorithm); Risk perception; Actuarial science; Business; Perception; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.15554457937963745,"score_gpt":0.4893954260356387,"score_spread":0.33385084665600123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761565494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986681,0.000009340848,0.00011975788,0.000069082875,0.0000016747298,0.000072995856,0.000071472045,0.000001425715,0.000986199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864477,0.000017275537,0.00028161283,0.0000435093,0.0000019354798,0.00009313648,0.00009378052,7.4270804e-7,0.00082330016],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729985,0.0013238996,0.00015028803,0.00019512515,0.00060315867,0.0004277627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97983414,0.0126144765,0.0042924737,0.0013292487,0.0006697476,0.0012599485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056247683,0.00023702702,0.00042953077,0.00028743639,0.0008993941,0.0015626268,0.0005361729,0.00091142755,0.0046687042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013690792,0.00027035206,0.00047585435,0.0003548331,0.0009947214,0.00064219447,0.00075358874,0.0010801726,0.0003058302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037399621,0.017247327,0.94541544,0.00014267355,0.0001807125,0.00016234379,0.0070137703,0.0019667002,0.003267539,0.0018719936,0.0006891999,0.018302258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004029223,0.0043266355,0.97488767,0.000047641985,0.00012734394,0.000045791032,0.006390728,0.009232844,0.0020588955,0.0012945243,0.0011390923,0.000045848494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10549662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09849284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10549662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018503483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032185595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20976514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763802588","doi":"10.1007/s10834-017-9548-1","title":"Uncertainty, Doubts, and Delays: Economic Circumstances and Childbearing Expectations Among Emerging Adults","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Fertility; Context (archaeology); Demographic economics; Psychology; Unintended pregnancy; Sample (material); Economics; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Demography; Population; Family planning; Sociology; Research methodology","score_opus":0.022779675474386835,"score_gpt":0.29697128295725106,"score_spread":0.2741916074828642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763802588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99781966,0.00028869061,0.000016141828,0.00057727663,0.00001194365,0.0000060136335,0.00006795167,5.3229263e-7,0.0012118692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995962,0.0001280289,0.00001213035,0.000058045876,0.0000072084727,0.000003434059,0.000033879922,4.8116027e-7,0.00016077347],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991485,0.00028127804,0.000117989206,0.000057809502,0.00016611555,0.00022818705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905427,0.0035737357,0.0033720897,0.00018030702,0.0006170844,0.0017141086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002381256,0.0001770582,0.00029038195,0.00081953144,0.0011353457,0.0017728659,0.00048300857,0.0010343865,0.0030231487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017225979,0.0002631879,0.00036190526,0.0006158976,0.0009659441,0.0016986156,0.0013289042,0.002162714,0.00020553028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013071856,0.00017897533,0.9775778,0.000021435448,0.000024366062,0.00034964475,0.016841093,0.00007300717,0.00007828881,0.00034539218,0.00023583279,0.004143329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000112208545,0.00018206531,0.88846815,0.000089372144,0.00003362725,0.0005593396,0.10828563,0.00042389345,0.00013680728,0.00064371515,0.0011355142,0.000030687883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017408594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022325208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017408594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072233373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011574577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034614563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764324617","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.45.3.405","title":"Who Remains Unpartnered by Mid-Life in Norway? Differentials by Gender and Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Norwegian; Odds; Marital status; Demography; Cohabitation; Psychology; Gerontology; Odds ratio; Medicine; Geography; Sociology; Population; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.07980400359014125,"score_gpt":0.3774712735016454,"score_spread":0.29766726991150416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764324617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980927,0.0007478562,0.000031867476,0.00008379219,0.000014848683,0.000002973755,0.0005263813,0.0000011831759,0.0004982875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988575,0.00034643555,0.00002058049,0.000024146402,0.0000047223707,0.0000036724623,0.0004029013,0.0000010813588,0.00033898064],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993673,0.000121237965,0.00003986445,0.00011449957,0.000058660462,0.00029840143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990042,0.00016950915,0.0003564745,0.000039990373,0.000059682046,0.00037017706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076357997,0.00016139245,0.00032853728,0.000653876,0.00054301944,0.00064715336,0.00052609754,0.00037667737,0.0018904886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019499098,0.00025240972,0.00049403874,0.00070975395,0.000440432,0.00058248406,0.0007262996,0.00052223826,0.00028235748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009745963,0.000024951365,0.9961378,0.000008854362,0.000023165298,0.00016445317,0.0009019893,0.000054257493,0.000091266644,0.00006931041,0.00016862013,0.0022578342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016886083,0.00003869717,0.99790335,0.000022431836,0.0000074695986,0.000076850985,0.0015677017,0.00005966548,0.00001931209,0.000039589162,0.00025964656,0.0000036439587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1623008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22924158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1623008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009030165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094409817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32271218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767946149","doi":"10.1002/jid.3333","title":"Income Effects on Intra‐Household Time Allocation: Regression Discontinuity Evidence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Government of Alberta","funders":"International Development Research Centre; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement","keywords":"Economics; Regression discontinuity design; Work (physics); Time allocation; Demographic economics; Leisure time; Labour economics","score_opus":0.03446226306930273,"score_gpt":0.32433601658584776,"score_spread":0.28987375351654504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767946149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96321833,0.005207292,0.016481645,0.0014634004,0.000094827396,0.00010649648,0.0030905353,0.00009277385,0.010244686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956577,0.0008016635,0.00121897,0.00014207588,0.00003167905,0.00004673915,0.0008009394,0.000017122911,0.0012831608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99310714,0.0048321923,0.00030972104,0.0006619138,0.0004910545,0.0005979847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.938974,0.043438308,0.011035775,0.004549237,0.0014227019,0.0005800393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011638894,0.00035176813,0.00090548873,0.0016963563,0.00073869043,0.0014763963,0.0021061753,0.0008386616,0.013613727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04540478,0.00038913617,0.0014450666,0.0025834844,0.0012514181,0.001114063,0.0019287806,0.0019499701,0.0010119443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011554469,0.0006211905,0.91196984,0.00040677295,0.002291888,0.00046310728,0.0018574211,0.008605739,0.00036449713,0.021415384,0.0030146507,0.047834016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018887364,0.00038773802,0.93080395,0.0006903972,0.0022854249,0.00027268915,0.0026942126,0.030340798,0.001118581,0.022566112,0.008574165,0.000077070734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03410542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015207212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03410542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077370886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005371814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06781381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769578543","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2017-039","title":"Economic Well-Being of Canadian Children","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Demographic economics; Economics; Geography; Development economics; Economic growth; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.01700737439947895,"score_gpt":0.26319723964328384,"score_spread":0.2461898652438049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769578543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94424284,0.0042021065,0.000097991215,0.0023431142,0.000059923514,0.00004367939,0.016328266,0.000015608552,0.032666545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924992,0.0020455862,0.00015840287,0.00014713015,0.000009743577,0.00001743029,0.002562215,0.0000062236923,0.0025541072],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989291,0.00006162315,0.000034402165,0.00008400641,0.0004285976,0.00046228827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987185,0.00004345056,0.00016175648,0.000034845383,0.0006808053,0.00036062082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086884905,0.00029670465,0.00038727096,0.0025986184,0.0038018746,0.0015781206,0.0006816841,0.00033816072,0.0034357603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002439372,0.00016172644,0.0006262276,0.0048882463,0.0008979949,0.0003941544,0.0009534364,0.00069190643,0.00029434892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009591936,0.000037174155,0.9452031,0.00012993108,0.00009529234,0.00023007202,0.009609969,0.00030999933,0.00024016516,0.002789523,0.011828787,0.029429946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022359834,0.000014482452,0.9868094,0.00005767073,0.000014817651,0.000059692702,0.004313528,0.00006471041,0.000045609297,0.00008757231,0.008508349,0.000021954736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030720398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030720398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025715873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22289312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771443830","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v10i1.42252","title":"Taxing Feedlots in Alberta: Lethbridge County's Tax on Confined Feeding Operations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Alberta Beef Producers","keywords":"Geography; Agricultural economics; Business; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.059803591309291894,"score_gpt":0.34633914165204754,"score_spread":0.28653555034275563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771443830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6980799,0.0018092674,0.0031119364,0.0105603,0.00031240043,0.00018332306,0.0011051496,0.00026324546,0.28457463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8503022,0.0013876074,0.0021139125,0.00156101,0.000057032375,0.00003238803,0.00082786824,0.00003836605,0.14367965],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993818,0.000031390307,0.000006070172,0.000033177796,0.00034656833,0.0002010117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995352,0.000044918674,0.000029754201,0.00002299972,0.00018448368,0.00018260672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038672757,0.0001674666,0.00009093289,0.0006595357,0.0028944127,0.0026627532,0.0011327303,0.0007754394,0.006120689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007925984,0.0001666515,0.00016048214,0.0011548509,0.0011899468,0.0005081316,0.00090485235,0.0009213506,0.00035049507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006484591,0.0005839347,0.22205529,0.00042795425,0.00008039818,0.007117778,0.009527216,0.012029931,0.014339507,0.12610617,0.18730609,0.4197772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012049255,0.00025836294,0.3592908,0.0003284207,0.00006807998,0.0007582723,0.015534467,0.00843716,0.0029073635,0.0042602452,0.6079213,0.000115027324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9597528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98592293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040247202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024070745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035411038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17464632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771885654","doi":"10.1080/13545701.2017.1404621","title":"Gender, Low-Paid Status, and Time Poverty in Urban China","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Bureau of Statistics of China","keywords":"Poverty; Overtime; China; Demographic economics; Time-use survey; Wage; Economics; Survey data collection; Labour economics; Economic growth; Work (physics); Geography","score_opus":0.016835002115535423,"score_gpt":0.2558052771799857,"score_spread":0.23897027506445026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771885654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99950445,0.000037139536,0.000032787815,0.000041358173,0.0000011496555,0.0000018488325,0.00007188251,8.8134715e-7,0.00030848707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997676,0.000029253144,0.000013919056,0.0000062177783,0.000001320165,0.0000017473022,0.000064155094,4.1339518e-7,0.00011537658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996542,0.000072384406,0.000016499742,0.000045134144,0.00006160181,0.00015020443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987503,0.00018831441,0.0005258812,0.00006465596,0.00011529787,0.00035559115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000830665,0.00018263893,0.00020182766,0.0012597668,0.00075487344,0.0005701209,0.0002874123,0.0001956717,0.0013787394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016773448,0.00012381181,0.00024076842,0.0014530779,0.00062439556,0.0004362138,0.0007236783,0.00021147262,0.00010088903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028051078,0.000019709727,0.99534744,0.0000067519077,0.000016398899,0.00008846455,0.00074463047,0.00032081854,0.000072759794,0.0004906296,0.00017773095,0.0026865434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022995762,0.000021287256,0.99668914,0.000008182569,0.000008052944,0.000029098699,0.0015708886,0.0010295567,0.000037177077,0.00029728064,0.00030288278,0.000004273413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04910748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06659884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04910748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010053277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093479734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097643316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772283625","doi":"10.1332/030557317x15053060139376","title":"Matching policy tools and their targets: beyond nudges and utility maximisation in policy design","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Nudge theory; Incentive; Matching (statistics); Public economics; Focus (optics); Policy mix; Management science; Economics; Policy analysis; Compliance (psychology); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Microeconomics; Political science; Business; Public administration; Macroeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0663821511405952,"score_gpt":0.34703333370318673,"score_spread":0.28065118256259153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772283625","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08206491,0.0017046102,0.86098087,0.0071136667,0.00010429806,0.001329037,0.00009760359,0.00017220607,0.04643278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8249908,0.0005914541,0.1708349,0.0004225328,0.000047065805,0.0014294432,0.000034722256,0.00008587337,0.0015632171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.850963,0.13071766,0.0033159873,0.005934421,0.00695722,0.00211166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8920702,0.08445112,0.007375433,0.010996754,0.0032799586,0.0018265333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09641311,0.001553301,0.0032957618,0.004803382,0.0025139516,0.012446692,0.0032552548,0.004719075,0.0065762755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15779959,0.0017273262,0.0013873593,0.0048651267,0.02326933,0.021896295,0.010522506,0.0040532793,0.00059032603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018227217,0.00015490217,0.004616135,0.0004017523,0.00013526097,0.0000545735,0.0035414302,0.021275658,0.0003694389,0.91893697,0.0002971143,0.0500346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084389154,0.00019878177,0.0013101555,0.000290089,0.00004748815,0.000030077314,0.0011409977,0.019330803,0.00045795995,0.9730305,0.004042354,0.000036457262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018455611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018954517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09641311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008135945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066735414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50988734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772367224","doi":"10.1111/caje.12299","title":"Canadian contributions to family economics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Labour supply; Work (physics); Family life; Economics; Child labour; Labour economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Sociology; Geography; Socioeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0994579928697707,"score_gpt":0.23267632271155994,"score_spread":0.13321832984178925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772367224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032751905,0.20977877,0.0022559213,0.17981274,0.011055144,0.000065501525,0.0060230833,0.00018681139,0.5875469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15961225,0.27415645,0.0065720775,0.012928313,0.0054413476,0.00006602624,0.002283868,0.0001971499,0.5387426],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764687,0.00033359425,0.000078089244,0.00023139617,0.0013274343,0.00038253446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99318975,0.00097360014,0.00015596584,0.00037132448,0.00430663,0.0010027799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026883637,0.0008443008,0.00078210694,0.006462268,0.0059953667,0.004542891,0.0013098639,0.0021417383,0.063806534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078090723,0.00035850465,0.0008101614,0.008481749,0.003366312,0.0013872088,0.0018036326,0.002626334,0.0037293385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024134888,0.000020540252,0.0016210757,0.0003185491,0.000027087133,0.00014591921,0.0006212701,0.0007603011,0.0000687945,0.304165,0.5964427,0.09578469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033116514,0.000001955319,0.0025630053,0.0002451589,0.0000068928916,0.00004922946,0.00019014497,0.00022207142,0.000026346936,0.011864464,0.98481524,0.000012107732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9621196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9566768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9001398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.099860206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09547145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7245399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773972623","doi":"10.1080/02255189.2017.1377061","title":"Efficiency and gender equality in growth theory: simply add-ons?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender equality; Work (physics); Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Gender studies; Economic system","score_opus":0.09706161277329198,"score_gpt":0.30484170538033944,"score_spread":0.20778009260704747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773972623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059420396,0.01624102,0.16719545,0.22248456,0.0019559793,0.00007473669,0.00029022424,0.00010138746,0.5322362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96341187,0.0035821619,0.008349035,0.0069675134,0.001721579,0.00011880128,0.000069664195,0.00013352884,0.015645966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98970187,0.005647089,0.00034021598,0.0015997718,0.0017629851,0.0009479889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98061717,0.013645026,0.0011919793,0.0025692116,0.0014126031,0.0005639454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021450253,0.00081643456,0.0018537712,0.0021626574,0.003299959,0.008904063,0.002189867,0.0036991197,0.009992439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021727541,0.0004006529,0.0012209511,0.00178789,0.04462798,0.018235922,0.008997767,0.006961366,0.0011320803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002955578,0.0000032293601,0.00010931814,0.000009215633,0.0000027271358,0.0000054475886,0.00017121603,0.000119338634,0.000006363789,0.99781954,0.0003367409,0.0014138868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052859205,0.0000036529364,0.00014522024,0.000037794376,0.0000035090936,0.000011963521,0.000229985,0.00031342183,0.00004045675,0.99330044,0.005904927,0.00000327018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024519616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016223382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021450253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005244779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028128172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11344111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775560803","doi":"","title":"Women and homework: the Canadian legislative framework","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.022994625415195584,"score_gpt":0.26307184777143167,"score_spread":0.24007722235623608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775560803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009973826,0.035882965,0.0013313775,0.29806998,0.0027049389,0.00015740759,0.0013597265,0.0001225825,0.65039724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3700493,0.05981106,0.0048942314,0.098621406,0.0018257162,0.0005483802,0.00096574257,0.00030729262,0.46297684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883151,0.0013280759,0.00026838985,0.00074748026,0.004457832,0.004883102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897886,0.0017756509,0.0002911662,0.0002840399,0.005075327,0.002785173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007533838,0.00086343137,0.00086840993,0.005867841,0.0426562,0.019135078,0.004945533,0.008455268,0.019057924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014801177,0.0010639725,0.000727894,0.01061422,0.02303131,0.0052897576,0.004783083,0.008079869,0.0011998843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016751712,0.00003096204,0.0015481975,0.0001283865,0.0000076157467,0.00010913033,0.011926668,0.0002825489,0.00007903683,0.6916877,0.26587427,0.028308641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012351123,0.000007253472,0.009011954,0.0008074266,0.00002092211,0.000033737815,0.016114624,0.00017890723,0.0000673999,0.02251709,0.9511558,0.000072570256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2282402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2282402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5182952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89513195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779912173","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190628963.013.26","title":"Women and the Labor Market","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Empiricism; Economics; Work (physics); Neoclassical economics; Politics; Positive economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Feminist theory; Feminism; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gender studies; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025696127492634075,"score_gpt":0.28356410386003483,"score_spread":0.2578679763674008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779912173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038574316,0.07937904,0.0010906336,0.105282314,0.0012936448,0.000033525626,0.000237802,0.000021484308,0.7740872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71143395,0.059381533,0.0006450551,0.015702894,0.0021820578,0.000112631584,0.00014849445,0.000042164247,0.21035118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902534,0.00043444618,0.000016942618,0.000097936965,0.00014908005,0.00027622323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999629,0.00019573742,0.00005024604,0.000015192183,0.00003342645,0.000076316705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011036652,0.00028877766,0.0002167901,0.00078928133,0.00339949,0.0048744855,0.00041439928,0.0014670443,0.02296529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001769576,0.000099938996,0.00015071838,0.001152706,0.0066563967,0.002813089,0.0020170116,0.0012979519,0.0019729158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012202646,0.000022654718,0.0015564044,0.000047269154,0.0000028199267,0.000091793096,0.007622478,0.000060629947,0.000055739023,0.9464392,0.023546277,0.020542482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070779793,0.000023681945,0.0036761158,0.0004220737,0.0000025822249,0.00010688628,0.01595554,0.00007439141,0.00007307037,0.22229275,0.7573564,0.000009522627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007943667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009943598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02296529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002939032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025951453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07682651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783291876","doi":"","title":"Review of For the Family: How Class and Gender Shape Women’s Work","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Gender, Science, and Technology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Gender studies; Work (physics); Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.03866714263906662,"score_gpt":0.3238507106823986,"score_spread":0.285183568043332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783291876","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000133779,0.9949856,0.000038893202,0.0031891847,0.0009092101,0.000004890381,0.000043183256,0.0000015172698,0.00069386826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017021887,0.99473757,0.00012349189,0.0020090186,0.00091283716,0.000015159828,0.000047606234,0.0000042724505,0.00044789657],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998711,0.0005037338,0.00024829726,0.00019425912,0.000245103,0.00009748772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884028,0.008490227,0.00063473586,0.00017394517,0.0019158309,0.00038242145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003488541,0.0008029676,0.0019759047,0.0045468025,0.000859269,0.0022852253,0.0013990819,0.0023850857,0.006103593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01081853,0.00047720046,0.00089358055,0.005945534,0.001411906,0.00248796,0.0012899493,0.0020910993,0.0010160615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019673652,0.00004668412,0.00092648534,0.07150462,0.00044620087,0.00021475635,0.0016440037,0.00015155485,0.0003243114,0.006379503,0.24314359,0.6750216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020354506,0.000047785517,0.004141521,0.06613201,0.00034884896,0.00037101167,0.0010841904,0.000016422418,0.00005669272,0.0017335222,0.92601717,0.000030508361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014187337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035671614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014187337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022583457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008812612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028209507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785322041","doi":"10.1086/733488","title":"Men, Women, and Capital: Estimating Substitution Patterns Using a Size and Gender-Dependent Childcare Policy in Chile","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Productivity; Capital (architecture); Labour economics; Legislation; Capital intensity; Economics; Business; Demographic economics; Human capital; Market economy; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.022416061457809763,"score_gpt":0.29361722967105625,"score_spread":0.27120116821324647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785322041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952083,0.0002471802,0.0008693138,0.00043564706,0.0000055560627,0.00003427236,0.001965952,0.00002100545,0.0012128408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915001,0.0003807076,0.0015336234,0.00009286607,0.000010768024,0.00010139396,0.003832079,0.000013746688,0.002534726],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993722,0.00031643428,0.00003021737,0.000117060255,0.000036586734,0.00012751846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952034,0.0029415402,0.00097107864,0.000393575,0.00019673722,0.00029373704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021826343,0.000404414,0.00069216633,0.0010128239,0.00057520106,0.001305452,0.0017325742,0.0008128274,0.0050478755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058420515,0.0005483329,0.0008284039,0.0026950892,0.0006500934,0.0007363566,0.0012520774,0.0010528328,0.000781139],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034043353,0.0004782038,0.9388596,0.00016640879,0.00026586116,0.00041791322,0.0014809952,0.034649834,0.00036832222,0.0025315995,0.0036240295,0.016816769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014664333,0.00027472374,0.8719916,0.00016696639,0.00016647288,0.00011350114,0.012277481,0.10054969,0.0007637451,0.003308078,0.010164644,0.00007659012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31849384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1816202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31849384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026129447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017579409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63328004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786941502","doi":"10.1186/s12651-019-0263-2","title":"Economic cycle and deceleration of female labor force participation in Latin America","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Labour Market Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad Nacional de La Plata; International Development Research Centre; American Association of Equine Practitioners Foundation; Inter-American Development Bank","keywords":"Latin Americans; Business cycle; Economics; Demographic economics; Population; Economic model; Labour economics; Political science; Demography; Macroeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.048510899726157415,"score_gpt":0.402318176951207,"score_spread":0.35380727722504957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786941502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99704057,0.00036260838,0.000272826,0.00023696435,0.0000067577967,0.000005623458,0.00083263865,0.00000751055,0.0012344224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854845,0.00016355283,0.00009189605,0.000028947774,0.0000072738508,0.0000075862413,0.000599049,0.0000033356182,0.0005499959],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99980503,0.000079575206,0.000010063436,0.000041150644,0.000017711522,0.00004652296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989114,0.00027592634,0.0005336631,0.00008484847,0.000098520424,0.0000955999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083701743,0.00013064404,0.00022972564,0.00065459864,0.00022057311,0.00056467607,0.00024259732,0.00022264848,0.0027141748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022042214,0.00011915759,0.00027481312,0.00092668674,0.00021424679,0.00023618827,0.0003447117,0.00024856994,0.0002310978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027043283,0.000014772906,0.9969009,0.000006535774,0.00002797156,0.000026053247,0.00016258995,0.0002995919,0.00009824828,0.00016750493,0.00021783744,0.0020509819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035170212,0.000015050838,0.9975878,0.000013680153,0.00000967472,0.000023299659,0.00039757468,0.00078603026,0.00004279251,0.00011713576,0.0010007273,0.0000026616265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031766873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029230157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031766873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041098997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037558196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063163936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788654293","doi":"10.1177/1464700118754956","title":"Beyond the established categories: An alternative approach to feminist thought starting from debates about women and the rise of the market economy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Theory","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Sociology; Marxist philosophy; Gender studies; Kinship; Psychoanalytic theory; Feminist philosophy; Politics; Skepticism; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.011247662961697984,"score_gpt":0.25161929798762567,"score_spread":0.24037163502592768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788654293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017108893,0.019174965,0.1414242,0.20457307,0.0050492445,0.0001527827,0.00020816109,0.0001263498,0.6121823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7420511,0.012728424,0.063922554,0.034407463,0.006243484,0.0010123703,0.00017272167,0.00036485147,0.13909706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937018,0.0044926926,0.00011155612,0.0005456662,0.0007381335,0.00041010056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99530506,0.003123395,0.00030632297,0.00033185596,0.0006677195,0.00026558933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061025894,0.0007780979,0.0006047598,0.003526512,0.0071100257,0.010838705,0.00251953,0.004691692,0.0060353926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005396443,0.0002603115,0.00066609355,0.0029878914,0.04601385,0.014141208,0.004158372,0.008034833,0.0010041475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005088133,0.0000061214146,0.000050573006,0.000024038205,0.000001089814,0.000034554923,0.009763322,0.000031263084,0.000048856167,0.98452383,0.002496212,0.0030151084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009399062,0.000021454469,0.0001719545,0.00020594944,0.0000029222535,0.0001127218,0.01226846,0.00032056944,0.00013359009,0.71011657,0.2766245,0.000011843652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051536155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006250854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010838705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007740953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003967792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05616486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789550783","doi":"10.1177/0192513x18755197","title":"Matrimonial Expenditures and Egyptian Women’s Power Within Marriage","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Institute of International Education","keywords":"Power (physics); Association (psychology); Demographic economics; Demography; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020198000502977632,"score_gpt":0.31671283431642583,"score_spread":0.2965148338134482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789550783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983411,0.000110178575,0.000017555489,0.00005807952,0.000001103667,0.0000010518316,0.00006815538,4.0261057e-7,0.0014024121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999171,0.00010386691,0.000017574996,0.000006754744,0.000002363496,0.0000011482751,0.00006399292,3.4318765e-7,0.00063295086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983406,0.00004233579,0.000013395361,0.000021061604,0.000028299894,0.000060919192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895215,0.00020844543,0.0005982553,0.000045329565,0.000060425387,0.0001353536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039853208,0.00012261435,0.00012236836,0.0006306523,0.00042489613,0.00068578246,0.00019939594,0.0001546194,0.0044878838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016700036,0.00008276459,0.00012525078,0.0011330632,0.00033236592,0.00032859368,0.00057353463,0.00022449256,0.00021589012],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006992137,0.000035913952,0.9874263,0.000014432627,0.000030184463,0.0001354417,0.002727268,0.00009364288,0.00017964341,0.00086522126,0.00021703215,0.008204949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017573133,0.000017264352,0.9947247,0.00001205967,0.000006698487,0.00003769015,0.0038678006,0.00008574496,0.000059124628,0.00010356892,0.0010815198,0.0000019427841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014559245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028611999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014559245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007104994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000313145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028948963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790861068","doi":"10.7202/1043296ar","title":"Et si les conjoints ne partageaient pas tous leurs revenus ? Conséquences sur la mesure des inégalités du bien-être","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03228442270889831,"score_gpt":0.2768272785585247,"score_spread":0.24454285584962637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790861068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9625276,0.0020249758,0.012302234,0.0029529107,0.00008393439,0.00009627569,0.0016537439,0.000049723698,0.01830853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881471,0.00056079635,0.0046503274,0.00017559083,0.000012090592,0.00005665874,0.0003505967,0.000018794153,0.0060280054],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979438,0.00089041353,0.00009543673,0.0003511854,0.0004350939,0.00028411802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99214983,0.0029155156,0.001383693,0.0009023367,0.001721239,0.0009274264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039742966,0.00032192786,0.00066455966,0.00069637893,0.001915012,0.0026386909,0.0011572879,0.00071078487,0.013339174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018379038,0.00040610554,0.00068111916,0.0018182201,0.0019387872,0.0019386553,0.0018311911,0.0012624171,0.0010486426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014049812,0.0001628163,0.777176,0.00063723855,0.00084942457,0.0008012678,0.017269464,0.014722249,0.0023596848,0.02612188,0.0035984484,0.15489659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008172432,0.00049945025,0.8986129,0.0006951793,0.0004739303,0.00045527823,0.033538006,0.0102167,0.0014495054,0.0140737705,0.03978541,0.00011820741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21571153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33594918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78428847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004918252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051467284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42891192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791728604","doi":"10.18535/jmscr/v6i2.32","title":"Choice of place of Delivery amongst Women in a Rural Community in northeastern Nigeria","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Socioeconomics; Rural community; Economic growth; Sociology","score_opus":0.1597193960463785,"score_gpt":0.5035075498506696,"score_spread":0.34378815380429106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791728604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983119,0.0002946804,0.00006418337,0.00057263114,0.000010455428,0.000016038759,0.00001518919,0.0000011556245,0.0007138005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985569,0.0006510386,0.00013591629,0.00017914911,0.0000047004414,0.000018349767,0.000008531692,0.0000011018063,0.0004443302],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994092,0.00032410296,0.000028504728,0.00003841064,0.000066940804,0.00013288288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885976,0.0005426998,0.00025267786,0.00002040095,0.0000822243,0.00024219719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001286355,0.00021952136,0.00027396658,0.00034930056,0.0029982475,0.0009765793,0.00046794454,0.00056009385,0.0018026051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025577147,0.00033146437,0.00010938189,0.0003815117,0.0014701574,0.0007486791,0.0010359895,0.00058971276,0.00010503511],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017839667,0.00023031939,0.27841663,0.0005731845,0.000016060783,0.00821904,0.67685926,0.00007513599,0.0032851573,0.0009268479,0.0011112893,0.030108642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006251798,0.0002589691,0.058662914,0.0002943162,0.000009889493,0.001438345,0.9357228,0.00008796757,0.00013768525,0.00017489571,0.0031860445,0.000019917936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0149923535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028955432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0149923535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009846733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017832376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02981019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794804025","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v11i1.43393","title":"Social Policy Trends: International Trends in Female Employment Rates","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Social policy; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.07543429815583116,"score_gpt":0.4013692233084711,"score_spread":0.3259349251526399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794804025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60525703,0.06279258,0.0021074985,0.040711295,0.002236115,0.00012310955,0.10055082,0.00048512348,0.18573642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88216746,0.03916604,0.0013430397,0.0035198347,0.0018335544,0.00013603675,0.030422775,0.00012449193,0.041286863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955326,0.00005864727,0.00005393336,0.000099084136,0.00011278799,0.00012220039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780005,0.0002637969,0.0008474596,0.000076579585,0.0007744162,0.0002375951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007107456,0.00027154657,0.00018981531,0.0025757344,0.00035842365,0.00095938897,0.00025713732,0.00052151596,0.013041482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025960663,0.000112416725,0.00038378887,0.0047619683,0.0002430029,0.0009956511,0.0005135207,0.00071395765,0.0028098593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036383653,0.00011129597,0.6366347,0.0017753061,0.00014165741,0.00021702294,0.0028764072,0.0005923986,0.0017549719,0.016403107,0.11546029,0.22366896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066375933,0.000074460084,0.829551,0.0002712304,0.000023192233,0.00031969653,0.0014687126,0.00018426395,0.00041052763,0.00040968557,0.16726825,0.000012360005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01761546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017430859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01761546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085277547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008591187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043628156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797835555","doi":"10.2307/486429","title":"Women in Sub-Saharan Africa","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Socioeconomics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03433752204251186,"score_gpt":0.2444619804963015,"score_spread":0.21012445845378963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797835555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9625247,0.01638755,0.0000578681,0.008023115,0.00021918627,0.00004289984,0.0002705846,0.0000049952523,0.012468959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845685,0.011244874,0.000052163814,0.00089143356,0.00007537092,0.000047817284,0.000066797606,0.0000038522417,0.0030490935],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989422,0.0003337249,0.00003885533,0.00005256364,0.0000635749,0.0005691292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992539,0.00017255975,0.000121741155,0.000010893908,0.0000710982,0.00036973448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074638845,0.00043408023,0.00065456744,0.0022467899,0.007165631,0.0022097225,0.0006608728,0.0010869292,0.007020293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00225809,0.00041749325,0.00019321279,0.0056937817,0.0022454476,0.0021514047,0.0031662993,0.0011858948,0.0003479762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040066094,0.0003467792,0.29508445,0.0009524481,0.000072795985,0.004718757,0.61875504,0.0001352808,0.0010404176,0.011551133,0.010038514,0.056903746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004010733,0.00014504367,0.28863916,0.00056905835,0.000046164132,0.00081280194,0.6663327,0.000055874112,0.00013698517,0.0017067478,0.041487444,0.000027818549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11664033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21368669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11664033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023971368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043020854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2319228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797855495","doi":"10.18584/iipj.2018.9.4.2","title":"Estimating Institutionalization and Homelessness for Status First Nations in Canada: A Method and Implications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Indigenous Policy Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Census; Indigenous; Population; Political science; Demography; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.028255794533251024,"score_gpt":0.36433998460056144,"score_spread":0.33608419006731044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797855495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78158754,0.0019512739,0.17075555,0.004939134,0.00018940418,0.0033158166,0.021667367,0.000696076,0.014897772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8167111,0.00082732935,0.17137614,0.00042888933,0.000036462025,0.001760218,0.0044423337,0.00008154439,0.0043358775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99539375,0.0018157345,0.00029535967,0.0005644303,0.0015004494,0.00043029737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912675,0.0029218374,0.0013406603,0.0006113133,0.0034554594,0.000403301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074451407,0.00068789284,0.00060937495,0.003538873,0.0029077705,0.001561854,0.0023623023,0.00052597397,0.0019876796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026379615,0.00031536593,0.00092385506,0.00660587,0.0009968912,0.0005915851,0.001597453,0.00088705705,0.00021800725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006251683,0.00007034241,0.91615635,0.00013948201,0.0002494718,0.00014651894,0.001646405,0.008761337,0.00020033756,0.003683033,0.0052269925,0.063657224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009456215,0.00008609096,0.9163383,0.00029755483,0.00024498216,0.00020749652,0.005366441,0.059368182,0.0016057232,0.004144966,0.01208633,0.00015934727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98580176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9828493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019060936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019060936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03269877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13829744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799490533","doi":"10.1111/caje.12335","title":"Welfare analysis when people are different","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Welfare economics; Gens; Economics; Economic rent; Poverty; Econometrics; Inequality; Estimation; Welfare; Consumption (sociology); Mathematics; Humanities; Sociology; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Art","score_opus":0.08067415417525386,"score_gpt":0.20314211962995157,"score_spread":0.12246796545469771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799490533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49169877,0.0024251514,0.14132594,0.020784598,0.0004530583,0.00032057217,0.0032453754,0.00016710111,0.33957955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790288,0.0006007146,0.005762874,0.0008410455,0.00007354899,0.00017176359,0.00056823227,0.00002515519,0.012927728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964121,0.0016403359,0.00009692386,0.00036298975,0.000615606,0.00087200454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998524,0.00054678443,0.00019204292,0.00026106182,0.00034153243,0.00013462541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027656225,0.00030597634,0.00067610346,0.0012769774,0.001206692,0.0023155469,0.0007475363,0.0009482187,0.017606724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069374386,0.00016738902,0.0008983142,0.0020817749,0.002097039,0.0024110787,0.0028961597,0.0015117481,0.00079311035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014376205,0.000156922,0.01734103,0.000108542656,0.00010982757,0.00037108632,0.0022352429,0.010224533,0.00049963535,0.88716096,0.010099045,0.07154938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031354775,0.000081512284,0.027954591,0.00016189703,0.00006690096,0.00017713482,0.004679183,0.02235961,0.0003804782,0.9034695,0.04060031,0.00003742757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014329863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072476696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017606724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035618932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012325541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058900416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799852352","doi":"10.1111/jlca.12309","title":"(En)Gendering Equality? Conditional Cash Transfers as National Development in Post‐Neoliberal Ecuador","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.023637631154971906,"score_gpt":0.32952314029554153,"score_spread":0.3058855091405696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799852352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9398856,0.0032004293,0.00022901279,0.009081776,0.000042089352,0.000014920213,0.00017235316,0.000007800663,0.047365975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993803,0.00056579156,0.000061321545,0.0001536589,0.000011967703,0.00001501102,0.000032244796,0.0000014676322,0.0053554843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994516,0.0001631523,0.000017784154,0.00004228284,0.000042736036,0.00028243902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992912,0.00016938862,0.00023824286,0.000032292242,0.00013002868,0.00013878942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012049726,0.00013798739,0.00016178073,0.0006191092,0.0015263421,0.0023711303,0.0005236985,0.00042738285,0.009354215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023774381,0.00006604881,0.000099962155,0.0010534168,0.0016783233,0.0017471361,0.0023935211,0.0004902883,0.00019999707],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047942865,0.00029967533,0.32178867,0.00038341363,0.000057346886,0.002908546,0.11920692,0.0013872801,0.0009695681,0.32881343,0.011268312,0.21243745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003418483,0.00018888825,0.66312474,0.00057930505,0.00004205452,0.00030266348,0.14895599,0.0008897705,0.00076836656,0.017362693,0.16771251,0.000038831215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06856479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05943691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06856479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00543975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002189168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13633138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801233642","doi":"10.25336/csp29354","title":"Marriage Vows and Racial Choices","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.04883067370709814,"score_gpt":0.346727443968884,"score_spread":0.29789677026178585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801233642","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19219066,0.34015408,0.000399921,0.19430467,0.0035979198,0.000039098686,0.0031086192,0.000041821146,0.26616317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7478904,0.12592325,0.00054702547,0.0043271896,0.0010565366,0.00003489002,0.00063598657,0.000058353282,0.119526386],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997062,0.00015016097,0.000005639546,0.00003390893,0.00004749484,0.000056494217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937147,0.00024011698,0.00010727018,0.000026524327,0.000079203324,0.00017548648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087524584,0.00022248103,0.00021728035,0.00066266645,0.0027077417,0.0021366482,0.00029720293,0.00048563955,0.026679624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026573478,0.00024230791,0.00019377847,0.0012417891,0.00225491,0.0013525499,0.0012787539,0.0014131746,0.0022131905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014323273,0.00018181895,0.05918629,0.0002074127,0.000044222852,0.0001452777,0.043905083,0.00026949466,0.00017422024,0.11735832,0.58821356,0.19017105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020130321,0.00004870078,0.24935351,0.00179671,0.000028868073,0.000209809,0.07431523,0.00024277547,0.00009208212,0.029798502,0.6440433,0.00005036468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15512143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40756556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84487855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015165333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019114282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30843705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803460999","doi":"10.1177/1367493518777152","title":"What would help low-income families? Results from a North American survey of 2-1-1 helpline professionals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Health Care","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Helpline; Family medicine; Medicine; Low income; Psychology; Emergency medicine; Socioeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.024976661632000973,"score_gpt":0.3532048392151185,"score_spread":0.32822817758311756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803460999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961383,0.0002996569,0.000023101065,0.0012503776,0.0000114743225,0.000023518623,0.0003267865,0.0000027957744,0.0019239145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99783427,0.000453861,0.00006515603,0.0007570626,0.000011051206,0.000045500685,0.00023115089,0.0000024789247,0.00059956894],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999348,0.00019456903,0.000050869177,0.000072085975,0.00015804086,0.00017638603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697125,0.00086082827,0.0010571694,0.000059869828,0.000386306,0.0006646331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011647718,0.0001547017,0.00013925844,0.00072062615,0.001229667,0.0007794147,0.00032551278,0.00058451865,0.0027492885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047590826,0.00017701025,0.00018919479,0.0006643451,0.00039691254,0.0008228155,0.00072551926,0.0007409744,0.00029801385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038437924,0.00013373079,0.9656754,0.000053567896,0.000014209438,0.00013813411,0.019184116,0.000024105644,0.00013062322,0.00012567698,0.0046508783,0.009831085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053593994,0.000051619816,0.9389196,0.00008752793,0.000008428544,0.00011184919,0.057979356,0.000083775485,0.0000382468,0.00005174126,0.0026551061,0.000007308501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08228404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16010395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08228404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001216862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013235525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16361016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803531154","doi":"","title":"Gender Based Analysis (GBA) in Canada: What Can Sectoral Ministries do in India?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MPRA Paper","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender mainstreaming; Mainstreaming; Political science; Public administration; Prima facie; Realm; Process (computing); Economic growth; Public relations; Gender equality; Sociology; Economics; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.018185662047391422,"score_gpt":0.2482611725596205,"score_spread":0.23007551051222908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803531154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6816924,0.004585386,0.0011668544,0.139202,0.0005557669,0.00013851341,0.0008086504,0.00012989937,0.17172061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97507733,0.0018048902,0.0005477674,0.0052990094,0.00002692242,0.000030955496,0.00011789481,0.000040351642,0.017054826],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99282974,0.0009797838,0.000117248834,0.0004061744,0.0016853429,0.0039816066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98841405,0.0015667401,0.00074294745,0.00038580457,0.0033019336,0.0055885315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042216354,0.00039750646,0.00053873734,0.0030075512,0.039093837,0.010539072,0.002238557,0.0016462377,0.007749583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103388075,0.00043336,0.00042412142,0.0066692727,0.01591583,0.0032689387,0.005661299,0.0038239583,0.0005372188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013741158,0.00016608015,0.16936684,0.00037082593,0.000052101364,0.0017820799,0.4876264,0.00045872453,0.0015783679,0.1461778,0.0666418,0.1256415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007856422,0.000046060624,0.15417655,0.00042081304,0.000025545907,0.0003020443,0.6540857,0.00027431716,0.0005034122,0.005005769,0.1850295,0.00012242999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9900832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87261415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12738588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25377604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9242536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803745111","doi":"10.1257/pandp.20181051","title":"On the Heterogeneity in Family Earnings and Income Dynamics in the PSID","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AEA Papers and Proceedings","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Earnings; Economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.016648199394482296,"score_gpt":0.26261770068436285,"score_spread":0.24596950128988054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803745111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968003,0.00020721633,0.00041059288,0.00062973937,0.0000050374483,0.000005106413,0.00039387154,0.0000033052747,0.0015448758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940884,0.00008732374,0.00005511863,0.00003591518,0.0000071851678,0.000002321402,0.00024100763,0.0000011265528,0.0001611504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986889,0.00060336076,0.0000591726,0.00023273636,0.00016613862,0.0002496968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896331,0.006627406,0.0020145343,0.0008975003,0.00025693612,0.00057051197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033679537,0.000121921104,0.0004382791,0.0010216044,0.0008360047,0.0013133029,0.00042515303,0.0005244701,0.003308411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010088815,0.00015757534,0.00035729766,0.0019597085,0.001319364,0.0010536842,0.0015237274,0.00084123877,0.00026695876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010095347,0.00006090721,0.9801942,0.000009659639,0.00011980565,0.00014522237,0.0012961266,0.0016938931,0.00017895769,0.007011989,0.0007358971,0.008452392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008287699,0.00003708307,0.98821276,0.00001739959,0.000028369277,0.00007553938,0.0020747702,0.0031183497,0.00006629877,0.0054437625,0.0009027125,0.0000146484035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013559745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015963512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013559745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078758976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005084019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026961684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805711468","doi":"10.1111/dech.12426","title":"The Invisible Hand that Rocks the Cradle: On the Limits of Time Use Surveys","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Development and Change","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Global Affairs Canada; Cornell University","keywords":"Subsidy; Context (archaeology); Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Work (physics); Economics; Public economics; Geography; Psychology","score_opus":0.12679037138610463,"score_gpt":0.2854585675878093,"score_spread":0.15866819620170466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805711468","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0414227,0.067413755,0.1625863,0.6090364,0.0046294434,0.001495079,0.0026226044,0.00044175785,0.11035191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6084048,0.04075746,0.21310768,0.104469895,0.008055381,0.01076861,0.0008553824,0.00059361965,0.012987231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.4137163,0.5446498,0.00788413,0.007053122,0.024372939,0.00232373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1285856,0.8068735,0.01333444,0.024355419,0.024041649,0.0028092808],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.45764285,0.0010512081,0.002645432,0.0070545007,0.0049442686,0.013306272,0.006479766,0.006604816,0.008745066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.63965124,0.0017842972,0.0013543384,0.007761656,0.029605864,0.027662298,0.014651052,0.010570464,0.0018037716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068580697,0.00024604725,0.039491914,0.005120928,0.00039281606,0.000317502,0.050732132,0.0019989684,0.0004681291,0.44946378,0.08642492,0.36465707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027108123,0.00084469386,0.025313776,0.030610522,0.00028303848,0.00080133876,0.046892054,0.006942126,0.0012266359,0.40923387,0.4770999,0.00048105387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019783495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0144725125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45764285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006600794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009718788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66882294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807896016","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3175379","title":"How Falsifiable Is Collective Rationality?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Falsifiability; Rationality; Test (biology); Economics; Yield (engineering); Inference; Empirical evidence; Positive economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016927639727033407,"score_gpt":0.27727759197218327,"score_spread":0.26034995224514984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807896016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24107139,0.00989614,0.18302256,0.385072,0.00396957,0.0002219436,0.001774474,0.0005016691,0.17447023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976278,0.0015485618,0.011273589,0.005263561,0.0014196098,0.00018296797,0.00024459363,0.00009410196,0.0036951648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96880955,0.018006736,0.0014095937,0.005523896,0.004569685,0.001680605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75992346,0.17462905,0.01357216,0.036442522,0.013029956,0.0024029207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043338794,0.0008131965,0.0032432093,0.002959546,0.004219076,0.009346287,0.00354478,0.007372013,0.0119928215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21856332,0.0007351902,0.0012833972,0.0027709052,0.030578589,0.019656144,0.0061904695,0.0074169585,0.0014808571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014226101,0.000070312366,0.003734118,0.00021934189,0.00016990809,0.000111609144,0.0014623546,0.0018104805,0.00009316316,0.9701231,0.0062714955,0.015791796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020184782,0.000007956144,0.00034344362,0.00004455896,0.000009569569,0.000019496318,0.00039046502,0.0008705144,0.00004782672,0.9963528,0.0018824228,0.000010757345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003705066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021381716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043338794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031221802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046196277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22920018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808061779","doi":"","title":"The effect of babies on mother’s labor supply by education and race","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Scholars' Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Flexibility (engineering); Race (biology); Demographic economics; Census; Labour economics; Work (physics); Demography; Psychology; Economics; Geography; Population; Sociology; Gender studies; Engineering; Management","score_opus":0.00900670344495252,"score_gpt":0.2687323459350093,"score_spread":0.25972564249005675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808061779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44573212,0.06888785,0.0049604066,0.018416204,0.001971118,0.000048393493,0.011654266,0.0002355166,0.4480942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5619374,0.04884341,0.0019108682,0.0019195229,0.00088098494,0.00006669639,0.004735273,0.0001456365,0.3795603],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998117,0.0000674288,0.000005611288,0.000017632798,0.00008406869,0.000013679592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988701,0.0009478776,0.00005493719,0.000025844389,0.00006489934,0.000036363315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031850472,0.00018056144,0.00020117636,0.0004469399,0.00019446423,0.00042774394,0.0002527507,0.00015693776,0.018419942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013777247,0.0001282468,0.00031222086,0.0009691548,0.00023241388,0.00038499298,0.0002623071,0.00029833792,0.0020775434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003078404,0.00017001762,0.29784104,0.00043652378,0.00026722948,0.0004624111,0.002711807,0.0059994007,0.0015543115,0.038875546,0.23476782,0.41660607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017851076,0.00030830764,0.66593164,0.00048703517,0.000143046,0.00047458027,0.00194455,0.0043574777,0.0009054798,0.010149465,0.31524816,0.000032475902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010795561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017123427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018419942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004046041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000465094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06162089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809583945","doi":"10.55221/2572-7478.1931","title":"Harris's \"Created to live: Becoming the answer for an abortion-free community\" (book review)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œChristian librarian:/˜The œChristian librarian","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Horizon College and Seminary","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; History; Sociology; Biology; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.03710103160251193,"score_gpt":0.29512620375460996,"score_spread":0.258025172152098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809583945","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025268368,0.94477946,0.00011169802,0.035568606,0.004823648,0.000017276378,0.000067342065,0.000013939109,0.014365459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0044600973,0.90304625,0.0003041013,0.061414864,0.0036011206,0.00007895384,0.000100340505,0.000028289092,0.026965968],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922526,0.00030740342,0.000046281115,0.00006557142,0.0002745633,0.00008087874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983917,0.001066056,0.00013073455,0.00002366896,0.00022141708,0.00016650055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015967193,0.0004067336,0.0007574113,0.0014537638,0.0011298411,0.003127232,0.0014286335,0.00439305,0.018256431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051147314,0.00028216155,0.00027344283,0.0025518797,0.002926409,0.0038984257,0.0025213533,0.0041934694,0.0027544496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002686661,0.000018326487,0.00010610468,0.0034094306,0.000013250134,0.00007408649,0.0005397752,0.000022730206,0.000044825305,0.01791548,0.75092906,0.22690012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015122381,0.000016000211,0.00048070707,0.0046181954,0.00001613858,0.00026571038,0.0005876149,0.000008482969,0.00003232992,0.0017851418,0.99216604,0.000008549134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014500533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047728784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018256431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002575722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068032905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06107384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810055662","doi":"10.1190/tle37070488.1","title":"President's Page","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Leading Edge","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Maternity leave; Workforce; Parental leave; Family Leave; Feeling; Childbirth; Pregnancy; Family medicine; Work hours; Nursing; Work (physics); Medicine; Psychology; Demographic economics; Business; Political science; Sick leave; Law; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.039520589753962686,"score_gpt":0.31345529033047914,"score_spread":0.2739347005765165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810055662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006062772,0.0039433925,0.00043144464,0.06266751,0.21126467,0.00031440743,0.001694194,0.00096669345,0.7181114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015711901,0.0015016763,0.00021253529,0.014728489,0.020858288,0.0001009934,0.00051871384,0.0001761912,0.96033174],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998966,0.00007291269,0.000052966807,0.00018507025,0.0005327429,0.00019030963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974361,0.0002025223,0.00008193049,0.00014168622,0.0013567669,0.00078092446],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010644018,0.0010233349,0.0007469214,0.0008538565,0.0018283947,0.0048322827,0.0009896406,0.0056435596,0.53760606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004380635,0.00035729323,0.0006622343,0.0006196957,0.00037667755,0.0024170682,0.001274838,0.0046208976,0.40922782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007840847,0.000015978798,0.000050128678,0.000024093924,6.965726e-7,0.000024770927,0.000005477239,0.000008594445,0.000041692234,0.00072314596,0.9862743,0.012823277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034778866,0.000008567182,0.00020772699,0.000034078752,7.835254e-7,0.000023423527,0.000014961778,0.000012551947,0.000021193971,0.00014344463,0.99952745,0.0000023355751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024240678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055094124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53760606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095884886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027894154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6595488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810455782","doi":"10.1080/09614524.2018.1481932","title":"Assessing the impacts of a peer-to-peer training programme for women in Peru","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Development in Practice","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre; Government of Canada","keywords":"Peer effects; Psychology; Sample (material); Cohesion (chemistry); Peer review; Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Political science; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0877328405177801,"score_gpt":0.39734920128922113,"score_spread":0.30961636077144106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810455782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966371,0.00041422475,0.00011643101,0.00027639224,0.0000060431757,0.00008933421,0.000025376907,0.0000069919924,0.002427933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99787354,0.00065936445,0.00046989231,0.00006921664,0.000013722806,0.00013950607,0.000028652821,0.000002456373,0.00074369815],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839956,0.0010812122,0.000039284536,0.0000784981,0.00012544058,0.00027596726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979285,0.0011288506,0.00031707776,0.000097255856,0.00019309402,0.00033523733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019427477,0.00040661302,0.000306152,0.0006062118,0.0012283805,0.00053569145,0.0006172403,0.00055465515,0.0034013274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00681466,0.00016154272,0.00027688028,0.00057638343,0.000790488,0.00045191936,0.0020917342,0.00034787916,0.00016952888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018690927,0.006395577,0.32536298,0.0027722737,0.00024565656,0.0018459682,0.12555434,0.00080187223,0.011464826,0.0009937361,0.0017081208,0.52098554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023641267,0.016081713,0.87477803,0.0005988812,0.00024355482,0.0004741898,0.088303484,0.00033647128,0.00223424,0.0005433762,0.016134107,0.000035414363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004956252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01695106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004956252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008711643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013941554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011378586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W283688185","doi":"","title":"Stigmatized Identities and the Well-Being of Individuals without Homes: Effects of Multiple Intersecting Stigmas","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.008753628317873248,"score_gpt":0.23354729234294297,"score_spread":0.22479366402506973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W283688185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952303,0.00017739594,0.000050330436,0.00083000015,0.000018361197,0.0000056679223,0.000008460077,8.717883e-7,0.0036785298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997074,0.000063683576,0.0000305933,0.00004734015,0.0000029725388,0.0000031699415,0.0000029854025,7.6099343e-7,0.00014101171],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99431676,0.003787765,0.0001519078,0.00025908838,0.0006008426,0.0008835567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886,0.005235005,0.002448685,0.0008682641,0.0007017704,0.0021462685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059183366,0.0002794397,0.00055357796,0.00091966626,0.0073677506,0.0044088094,0.00071395765,0.0015481329,0.0035153849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014395001,0.0003188149,0.00078672485,0.0006719345,0.0072941342,0.0019772246,0.006480666,0.0024919182,0.0001619187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033522868,0.0037842928,0.5601337,0.00016340516,0.00042398745,0.0018735698,0.34978172,0.0006634566,0.0025607054,0.03160216,0.0009625337,0.044698287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015928008,0.000612194,0.54797417,0.00024553188,0.00027210944,0.00086516,0.4276002,0.00080463785,0.0011297984,0.016191723,0.0040354147,0.00010984735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071771676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012160835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073677506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019293553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029747426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03129953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28546466","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-4339-7_4","title":"Comparing the Economic Well-Being of Baby Boomers and Their Parents in Quebec and Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Baby boomers; Geography; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02433571350594289,"score_gpt":0.23252076225176851,"score_spread":0.20818504874582563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28546466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98876464,0.0017076458,0.00006865058,0.0010755904,0.000025047562,0.000019368936,0.0014578227,0.000004379858,0.0068768794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897774,0.0014879756,0.00010944034,0.00020285448,0.0000072661333,0.000023866463,0.00090002234,0.0000065187014,0.0074846484],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996038,0.000056069042,0.00001344795,0.000032407654,0.00007175992,0.00022249922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999137,0.00007997692,0.00010880709,0.000020002868,0.00031956553,0.0003346525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000545122,0.00018674339,0.00029130507,0.001039126,0.004326323,0.001421661,0.0006623546,0.00036630555,0.0032002493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011719224,0.00020477326,0.0004554761,0.0030033076,0.0008587128,0.000489417,0.0008781441,0.0006444219,0.00019779154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016390889,0.000059432972,0.922365,0.00006140232,0.00008123323,0.00043400167,0.043690346,0.00025445822,0.00029358463,0.002199978,0.0075698607,0.022826802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041454155,0.000013505078,0.9704611,0.00005352917,0.000015373118,0.00002810159,0.025572617,0.000090924455,0.000037188107,0.00004300997,0.0036695453,0.0000111284635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033877123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033877123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02321657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24579686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W287098224","doi":"","title":"Earning and Caring in Canadian Families","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.017728991461498454,"score_gpt":0.26159520476164555,"score_spread":0.2438662133001471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W287098224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.960692,0.0041177836,0.0000904846,0.007947215,0.00013771094,0.000022938892,0.00033784326,0.0000069522494,0.026647128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933522,0.00192653,0.00009020014,0.00041142912,0.0000142912795,0.0000095824025,0.00006871521,0.000006196572,0.004120802],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996684,0.00047629775,0.00008240867,0.0001437951,0.00048400322,0.0021294192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952678,0.0005846244,0.0004157343,0.000079580794,0.0013204752,0.0023317125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020782987,0.0003794251,0.0006184375,0.002529482,0.03948435,0.004522531,0.0017823898,0.0012098333,0.0068848594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068501425,0.00035480043,0.000520059,0.0053025614,0.0054848664,0.0014013228,0.0033063672,0.0022139382,0.00019078098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044869125,0.00036339383,0.37726554,0.0002460476,0.00007425272,0.002836178,0.4508611,0.00074284384,0.00046895008,0.049041983,0.022981111,0.09466993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023354854,0.00006822123,0.31901374,0.0004334869,0.00004850202,0.00057708175,0.622256,0.00033047365,0.00016451454,0.0030417948,0.053927414,0.00011547756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99684274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11100524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11100524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16071077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8054032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884208588","doi":"10.1111/irj.12223","title":"Sexual orientation, labour supply and occupational sorting in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Relations Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Earnings; Spouse; Sorting; sort; Psychology; Demographic economics; Orientation (vector space); Labour economics; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05207163463087765,"score_gpt":0.3132243415571717,"score_spread":0.26115270692629405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884208588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826433,0.0010053756,0.00008975783,0.00043345478,0.00001929584,0.000049944607,0.0116418265,0.000007878019,0.0041090627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920849,0.00067248306,0.0001262874,0.00007245922,0.000004724502,0.000018207189,0.004050231,0.0000040079467,0.0029666277],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910945,0.00006221645,0.000043951186,0.00009228045,0.00031059614,0.00038142048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979006,0.000120036406,0.0003765785,0.000061787265,0.000991763,0.00054921024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078240916,0.00029413824,0.00035253237,0.0029850604,0.003244088,0.0013460573,0.001039366,0.00035293354,0.0039337086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00221757,0.00029146924,0.00053725665,0.006820053,0.00071707007,0.00032847901,0.0010403508,0.0005340404,0.00030440136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007649686,0.00003636164,0.9881783,0.000053920958,0.000049698385,0.000073311865,0.0014086401,0.00024189446,0.00012124651,0.00038612715,0.0021130508,0.0072608492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032806101,0.0000106922635,0.9960496,0.000032376178,0.000006448256,0.000014929011,0.0019547367,0.00019503932,0.000033929973,0.00003759447,0.0016536813,0.0000076180004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99879116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02622761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02622761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040454444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19029552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885557256","doi":"10.11575/sppp.v11i0.44203","title":"Social Policy Trends: Social Assistance Caseloads in Alberta by Family Composition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Composition (language); Social policy; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.03166275570997712,"score_gpt":0.3556218925323162,"score_spread":0.32395913682233907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885557256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8793004,0.0022027604,0.0004407,0.003981353,0.00012204615,0.00017620664,0.07883008,0.0003821098,0.034564298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9157477,0.002671033,0.0006324922,0.0007690382,0.00006867979,0.00012646585,0.05674213,0.00007432737,0.02316814],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981654,0.00007222707,0.00007526273,0.00017809549,0.0007476786,0.00076120324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580353,0.00029387604,0.0009226796,0.00011432009,0.001758482,0.0011071184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091556535,0.00040289422,0.0003436212,0.0056005693,0.0015178387,0.0016413548,0.0023743731,0.0005897378,0.009430613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040552565,0.0003321983,0.0006552987,0.0071166223,0.00093118916,0.00080917735,0.0015046663,0.0010619304,0.0009422119],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028011645,0.00011650195,0.91100323,0.00015864524,0.00010267915,0.0002696735,0.0019333566,0.0010682871,0.00044604644,0.0018671857,0.05211597,0.030638276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012372681,0.000016467036,0.98959726,0.000059125305,0.0000127490575,0.00007762579,0.0018954963,0.0004453221,0.00006323215,0.00009044252,0.007715314,0.000014635864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9832387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9894029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026230883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026230883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023662576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886010202","doi":"","title":"Heterogeneity and Long-Run Changes in U.S. Hours and the Labor Wedge","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Wedge (geometry); Labour economics; Economics; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.01899096978374902,"score_gpt":0.26305997770123696,"score_spread":0.24406900791748792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886010202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99337536,0.00061712455,0.00086700177,0.00086197146,0.000015851358,0.0000065460113,0.0012759606,0.000018327866,0.0029619536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986432,0.00026789837,0.000072776886,0.000053588923,0.000008785221,0.0000041273597,0.0003669324,0.000002998134,0.0005796879],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997799,0.00006264503,0.000013304853,0.00004602933,0.000024104478,0.00007401909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988544,0.0003921136,0.00049986504,0.00007357261,0.000061123756,0.00011891226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007723696,0.00018351595,0.00035362685,0.00056788296,0.00045093158,0.0010228918,0.0002518782,0.0004335681,0.0029154643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019827387,0.00013018255,0.000441218,0.0013011254,0.0005786121,0.00056374195,0.0006040205,0.00053903577,0.0002563391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003865211,0.00018751551,0.8741783,0.000090630936,0.00037334333,0.00092177244,0.0017370431,0.054629862,0.000859479,0.03516547,0.0065633086,0.024906741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057130354,0.00016392625,0.92110276,0.0000986773,0.00015334392,0.00019022668,0.003479165,0.03818262,0.00066550006,0.027921611,0.0079218885,0.000063099884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04650182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053567335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04650182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016835605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000684379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0924623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886081541","doi":"10.1016/j.rie.2018.07.006","title":"The impact of universal child benefits on family health and behaviours","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Exploit; Child health; Cash transfers; Economics; Child care; Cash; Demographic economics; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Public economics; Medicine; Nursing; Finance; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.08872170474274858,"score_gpt":0.39830840614509394,"score_spread":0.30958670140234534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886081541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98635244,0.004794918,0.000117502896,0.0023086392,0.000049745173,0.0000128816755,0.0006685444,0.000007753498,0.005687585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832124,0.00079814513,0.000062868996,0.00013308198,0.000023394701,0.000005178285,0.000087627755,0.0000023088705,0.0005660039],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683446,0.0012318039,0.0000841326,0.00022185022,0.00024263961,0.0013850752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99261063,0.004022323,0.001144361,0.0004448828,0.00031185965,0.0014658972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029035942,0.0002470015,0.00065263454,0.00075350254,0.00073631457,0.0011564784,0.0006319721,0.00094999385,0.008578812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0120061,0.00027377126,0.00097547256,0.00094102457,0.0012366652,0.00106857,0.0026077293,0.001110998,0.00015614605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001581516,0.0009848056,0.9159152,0.00025768857,0.000661576,0.00064787286,0.0012952213,0.001311154,0.00048466085,0.0109836245,0.0011190526,0.06475758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026494134,0.00023983222,0.9956858,0.00009778409,0.00019407726,0.00010539458,0.00087614486,0.00017099644,0.000110565124,0.0013118751,0.0011735663,0.0000075371076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040941108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06837581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040941108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019503289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001665097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08140564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886117772","doi":"10.1108/ijssp-11-2017-0160","title":"Combining diaries and interviews in time-use studies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Disadvantaged; Poverty; Perception; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Social psychology; Qualitative research; Social science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0654216110126624,"score_gpt":0.40270415135260745,"score_spread":0.33728254033994504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886117772","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22500086,0.006389597,0.65558046,0.00279997,0.002225668,0.03383036,0.0054941243,0.0007231066,0.067955844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36007807,0.0041083395,0.55189836,0.0015185672,0.0005321659,0.07335367,0.0017175864,0.00035080218,0.006442384],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.76728565,0.19994615,0.012793557,0.005082851,0.013134076,0.0017577055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6308294,0.2873056,0.021060603,0.030394534,0.02771976,0.0026901294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10257151,0.001610661,0.0015431005,0.011834755,0.0031890632,0.0058935294,0.0028399415,0.0016098998,0.005795013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16445407,0.0013127782,0.0007920246,0.015771862,0.00358379,0.009075413,0.009984319,0.002437638,0.0015310751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012851055,0.0008133856,0.036178485,0.009583504,0.00028239065,0.00081428286,0.37238568,0.0012864254,0.008731556,0.030560603,0.008390576,0.52968794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047655133,0.002318781,0.06451689,0.01381948,0.0003894981,0.0013685918,0.5666063,0.008421862,0.017454011,0.06496817,0.25899267,0.000667173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014591591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035672637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10257151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029577115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036583948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5424565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886855633","doi":"","title":"Tax Topics -- Child and Family Benefits","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.019047488479502314,"score_gpt":0.2523817781947515,"score_spread":0.23333428971524917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886855633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021949413,0.0035176408,0.00038245786,0.006700113,0.0024149236,0.0002283538,0.023415279,0.00062102603,0.96052533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0073596765,0.0049662874,0.00062772835,0.0009895138,0.00062232296,0.000057698435,0.010113009,0.00028445837,0.97497934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998621,0.000007903462,0.0000052545174,0.000007734277,0.00008319343,0.00003380127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948967,0.00007421924,0.000024266594,0.000012567883,0.00023362931,0.00016557828],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019885351,0.00034795929,0.0003976149,0.0014243299,0.0017666725,0.0013043726,0.0003336905,0.0005828161,0.4859161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070838054,0.00015182745,0.0002384096,0.0018224552,0.00016602992,0.0008675238,0.0005038687,0.00074428285,0.12013979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008292253,0.000022294376,0.0001750035,0.000047088077,4.1394927e-7,0.000016062662,0.00003920442,0.000017336817,0.00006046489,0.0011350657,0.97100115,0.027477523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032010655,0.000007272926,0.0029846095,0.000085420674,9.590511e-7,0.00002813186,0.0001314908,0.000016973589,0.00007680946,0.00046055054,0.9962016,0.0000029884286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077586204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22648609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4859161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018563742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027789436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7332783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889044736","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2017-030","title":"Dynamics of Permanent Exit from Welfare in Ontario, Canada: Duration Dependence and Heterogeneity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Duration (music); Nonparametric statistics; Economics; Demographic economics; Population; Hazard; Proportional hazards model; Hazard ratio; Econometrics; Demography; Statistics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02029581945846852,"score_gpt":0.25057488766341834,"score_spread":0.2302790682049498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889044736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99078596,0.0007664381,0.00023365112,0.0011466903,0.0000069421326,0.000024074396,0.0052170153,0.000008466105,0.0018107909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597436,0.00038855243,0.00010731095,0.000063227664,0.000004213511,0.000011445583,0.0019053611,0.0000044596504,0.0015410613],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988802,0.00011556939,0.00006113419,0.00016391234,0.00022110077,0.00055809086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99582016,0.00050648337,0.0014763057,0.00019874287,0.0010030977,0.0009952151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00126144,0.0001622366,0.0003972184,0.0013777596,0.0023533918,0.0014143983,0.0015513011,0.00050837814,0.0025263797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049697096,0.00027854595,0.00060661515,0.0029904994,0.0012182079,0.0006534978,0.0017937424,0.0008459295,0.00018906857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101517326,0.000025711575,0.9864202,0.000025694,0.00005525563,0.000116581476,0.0028956728,0.0006770452,0.00009656209,0.0008076041,0.0017341633,0.007044102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004016671,0.000011286519,0.9959489,0.000033911052,0.000014878157,0.00003268748,0.0019827574,0.00072621874,0.000017796568,0.00016204308,0.0010534172,0.000012070804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99480766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032873712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032873712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0255681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23851657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889704134","doi":"10.3386/w20829","title":"Patronage Politics and the Development of the Welfare State: Confederate Pensions in the American South","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Welfare; Welfare state; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.23449769622750122,"score_gpt":0.46594719279121755,"score_spread":0.23144949656371633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889704134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722286,0.00027811824,0.0000862078,0.0034432465,0.000009491123,0.0000035613916,0.000016544811,0.000002046167,0.023932138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980622,0.0001187382,0.000021884405,0.000118488206,0.000005166668,0.000002381235,0.0000057010748,0.000001535914,0.0016638857],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993882,0.00023162791,0.000011258361,0.000052261188,0.000050893257,0.0002657763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994097,0.00011982418,0.00016265857,0.000022368593,0.000043259595,0.0002422954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011644181,0.00007114378,0.00014124533,0.0010141191,0.0048443037,0.0022122683,0.0002891049,0.0005050159,0.004833062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001596466,0.00013421982,0.000111696965,0.0009068634,0.0053479844,0.0013856732,0.0031627049,0.0010673911,0.0002143146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020947355,0.00016001186,0.31714118,0.000058347097,0.000017765968,0.0008257815,0.38110703,0.0002136902,0.0020630327,0.25563163,0.0039819772,0.038590122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024076686,0.000058917074,0.55237275,0.00015629324,0.000015374011,0.00023703877,0.367388,0.00031919568,0.0006393549,0.02074087,0.058026053,0.00002206009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03538591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10944967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03538591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035454673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022420157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070359886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889874248","doi":"10.1177/0973801018786133","title":"Educational Attainment and the Gender Gap in Childcare in Canada: A Decomposition Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Margin The Journal of Applied Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Educational attainment; Gender gap; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Time-use survey; Set (abstract data type); General Social Survey; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Sociology; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.044010996070243565,"score_gpt":0.3566755094020217,"score_spread":0.31266451333177814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889874248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803514,0.0012994302,0.00084064505,0.0011573762,0.000036901285,0.00007439287,0.0113877,0.000038744492,0.0048134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98979527,0.0006601274,0.00057164964,0.0000857788,0.000014364144,0.00003734908,0.00622187,0.0000123811315,0.0026011795],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984213,0.00013655625,0.000058325484,0.0001580531,0.0004120438,0.00081366877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964056,0.0005333366,0.00060099387,0.00016955714,0.0014069631,0.00088349567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001708244,0.00042000908,0.0008448722,0.0035953016,0.0023851683,0.0022051171,0.0011608795,0.00044671487,0.0050864494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059233434,0.00031283643,0.0014995042,0.007491876,0.0009967781,0.0004995272,0.0019008884,0.0010797612,0.00034294606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008876772,0.00005107711,0.97483647,0.000040084113,0.00018216333,0.00015004353,0.0013406901,0.0017413265,0.00011112889,0.0037106555,0.004539023,0.013208554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000861178,0.000014320296,0.9870515,0.000056304558,0.000051090134,0.000026616919,0.0025132187,0.006486416,0.000048481124,0.0005771628,0.0031494696,0.00001685521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9923448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98956037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02349586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02349586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037470587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17047518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889999169","doi":"10.3386/w9782","title":"The Married Widow: Marriage Penalties Matter!","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Australian National University","keywords":"Spouse; Government (linguistics); Pension; Economics; Empirical evidence; Identification (biology); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Public economics; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.22073334426816088,"score_gpt":0.4805751705316623,"score_spread":0.25984182626350144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889999169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.755795,0.0231071,0.0019007785,0.12081924,0.0010574689,0.00006971665,0.005562427,0.000066388595,0.09162199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799737,0.003730555,0.00013435436,0.0035650814,0.0004611475,0.000011116756,0.0006257894,0.00001568285,0.011482614],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890244,0.00029611881,0.000045248747,0.00016689011,0.00028700658,0.00030228338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923315,0.0026853688,0.0029304458,0.0003398299,0.00070653454,0.0010062737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019411248,0.00023701912,0.0005470698,0.0007302998,0.0021125788,0.002233341,0.00058089895,0.0012465691,0.028084517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01528979,0.00015387489,0.00032915676,0.0018801151,0.001583351,0.0021339974,0.0011466023,0.0016056326,0.0014697046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006295362,0.00020282375,0.7523592,0.0002656858,0.00039225246,0.00046494475,0.0051778317,0.0006379865,0.0002872447,0.047191218,0.058728404,0.13366298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070111586,0.00014437546,0.87935793,0.0003856842,0.00046431107,0.00022083221,0.012817602,0.0009340824,0.00047922536,0.030015152,0.07505819,0.000052481715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19732042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24076271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19732042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012990785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002431474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39234376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890511472","doi":"10.3368/jhr.45.1.1","title":"Evidence from Maternity Leave Expansions of the Impact of Maternal Care on Early Child Development","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Human Resources","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of California, Davis; McMaster University","keywords":"Maternity leave; Child care; Maternity care; Child development; Psychology; Temperament; Medicine; Nursing; Developmental psychology; Health care; Economics; Economic growth; Personality; Social psychology; Sick leave","score_opus":0.029502455631711506,"score_gpt":0.3026050062275276,"score_spread":0.2731025505958161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890511472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98987424,0.0022212784,0.00007481017,0.0009730504,0.000008053865,0.000008954351,0.0007544924,0.000004900262,0.006080278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976826,0.0010732127,0.00005727935,0.00011227123,0.000010823126,0.0000050864937,0.00033306482,0.000001984535,0.0007237019],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726427,0.00051346625,0.00007184408,0.0002553802,0.001092782,0.0008022766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875031,0.004118213,0.0035372828,0.00088467123,0.0024049242,0.0015518137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022731663,0.00022661127,0.00037602586,0.0010617317,0.0017397212,0.000935348,0.0010495676,0.00043532715,0.003502375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0123535525,0.00019516863,0.00042830847,0.0022484097,0.0014816794,0.0003952101,0.0015298328,0.00072570005,0.00013671775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009921124,0.00009264254,0.9517086,0.0001339472,0.00022628426,0.0003631952,0.0039745197,0.0005347546,0.00060894096,0.0011079125,0.0010815214,0.039175544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048069423,0.000042979427,0.99806184,0.000025172456,0.00002936765,0.000028554477,0.00056259875,0.000046547513,0.000055558176,0.000028834556,0.0011094434,0.000004248452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88929033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93267286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88929033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010140238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010330244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22272325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890529847","doi":"10.3386/w15942","title":"Who Pays Cigarette Taxes? The Impact of Consumer Price Search","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Excise; Economics; Residence; Price dispersion; Monetary economics; Carton; Advertising; Business; Microeconomics; Demographic economics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.21205960610434735,"score_gpt":0.49483456197009135,"score_spread":0.28277495586574397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890529847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905076,0.000693003,0.0001387793,0.0015303228,0.00000986792,0.00000685284,0.000092850554,0.0000037759107,0.007016837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999092,0.00013502224,0.000023254792,0.000093186274,0.000011022668,0.0000012367752,0.000023158122,0.0000019204351,0.00061913737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923825,0.00031334165,0.000029797033,0.00010977435,0.00015325719,0.00015555162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896466,0.005745288,0.0031157301,0.0003546841,0.0003692534,0.0007684567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011778498,0.00009741257,0.0003931097,0.00062070886,0.00046217712,0.0018124293,0.0003498886,0.0008081991,0.0067089903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011110826,0.00015071809,0.00026020678,0.0010475282,0.00082591444,0.0012862913,0.0005699117,0.001013556,0.00050254795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045067616,0.00056580314,0.94916236,0.000043692886,0.00015656532,0.00041049678,0.0019849828,0.0018376324,0.00080465246,0.0080104815,0.0012362951,0.035336394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023528668,0.00012805368,0.98641986,0.000024911236,0.00006383458,0.00022411713,0.0034109086,0.0030966708,0.00035711325,0.0042663706,0.0019676636,0.00001694978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014577147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014091986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014577147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011138885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005736377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028984606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891732408","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3217476","title":"Gender Segregation in Education and its Implications for Labour Market Outcomes: Evidence from India","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Bordeaux; Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Earnings; Gender gap; Gender disparity; Demographic economics; Set (abstract data type); Test (biology); Life course approach; Longitudinal data; Economics; Labour economics; Psychology; Demography; Sociology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.03386238825319146,"score_gpt":0.3420540547412814,"score_spread":0.30819166648808993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891732408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99280083,0.0010149586,0.00006838767,0.0007888131,0.0000123334175,0.0000064223536,0.00030455555,0.0000019135564,0.005001834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910337,0.00036944405,0.000016682077,0.000050296167,0.000007644265,0.00000312787,0.00009197413,0.0000013259072,0.0003561702],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849,0.00045438932,0.00007143142,0.00015722058,0.00021108435,0.00061599445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938486,0.0026855606,0.0020160752,0.0002765966,0.00047695078,0.00069616496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014034008,0.00024538397,0.00047724388,0.0019782833,0.0020011836,0.0020006495,0.00081250205,0.000597689,0.0066592093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051208613,0.00018882104,0.00038459993,0.00521942,0.0032794229,0.0011952935,0.0026223548,0.0010780499,0.00044243372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036561352,0.0002849316,0.95666695,0.0001506359,0.00014697714,0.00051238,0.014131764,0.00018881349,0.00020478414,0.0054809116,0.0009859522,0.020880394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010372542,0.00007742813,0.9764881,0.00012139835,0.00006517933,0.00009386208,0.020272536,0.00007874426,0.00012688474,0.00107353,0.00157961,0.000012282144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074939355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10116008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074939355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013367197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018216242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14900637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892028872","doi":"10.1017/s0022050717000067","title":"Women's Income and Marriage Markets in the United States: Evidence from the Civil War Pension","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"The Journal of Economic History","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Remarriage; Pension; Demographic economics; Marital status; Economics; Spanish Civil War; Endogeneity; Labour economics; Political science; Demography; Population; Law; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.05063000298395224,"score_gpt":0.2740300939784383,"score_spread":0.22340009099448607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892028872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963941,0.0012973403,0.00002255107,0.00046054577,0.000012339797,0.0000045098486,0.0005310871,0.0000014479108,0.0012760625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99775213,0.0010983754,0.000016161346,0.00010785637,0.000019016983,0.0000054148395,0.0005149246,0.0000014714617,0.0004846409],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996119,0.00015583388,0.000030074068,0.00004414868,0.00005482955,0.00010329452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967765,0.000893822,0.0014019072,0.00014392288,0.00023036741,0.0005534135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001146451,0.00019720627,0.00035422674,0.0011404445,0.0009268947,0.0012418263,0.00046407917,0.00049971696,0.003511989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032804955,0.00023862041,0.00037363102,0.0017227,0.000621878,0.0005842232,0.0012131389,0.0005412849,0.0003624254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018927129,0.0001660468,0.99174255,0.000022936134,0.000099340454,0.00009796163,0.0007965523,0.000069324495,0.00003439301,0.0002839982,0.0009963335,0.00550124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012993367,0.0000492761,0.99667954,0.000027008156,0.000042843432,0.000027850954,0.0020032905,0.00007067865,0.000021817832,0.00009526075,0.0009658301,0.0000035229057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044558063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08075315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044558063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044630133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042610368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08859736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892051431","doi":"10.3386/w10541","title":"Incentive Effects of Social Assistance: A Regression Discontinuity Approach","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Regression discontinuity design; Incentive; Flexibility (engineering); Economics; Difference in differences; Estimator; Discontinuity (linguistics); Regression; Econometrics; Control (management); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15298204666534618,"score_gpt":0.4774355862439091,"score_spread":0.32445353957856293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892051431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5459268,0.002314557,0.42223012,0.0037323388,0.00051620114,0.0017967112,0.0063504903,0.0007700045,0.016362771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94697845,0.00057092396,0.039680243,0.00053807476,0.00019459586,0.0013529218,0.0021654945,0.000078808436,0.008440365],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98328376,0.012620122,0.0004991802,0.0012070253,0.0012390411,0.0011507437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9605637,0.031041855,0.0041326364,0.0022597692,0.0014803824,0.0005216941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021074353,0.00088378537,0.0023896373,0.003994636,0.0010182904,0.0021074794,0.00561823,0.0029102378,0.009961236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0625043,0.00061677874,0.0034734162,0.003144553,0.0011360613,0.0014883532,0.0027022169,0.0037811624,0.00085565564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002762216,0.0026850926,0.34969872,0.000996062,0.006295417,0.0027841774,0.002505723,0.19904627,0.003252895,0.29351938,0.0126831345,0.12377091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008643698,0.0013900559,0.112578236,0.00025273836,0.0022131454,0.000547583,0.0012368838,0.77616626,0.0028651592,0.08614156,0.015477513,0.00026646093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024608549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065056803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024608549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021952342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012918893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111453176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892240300","doi":"10.3386/w23453","title":"The Impact of Student Debt on Education, Career, and Marriage Choices of Female Lawyers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Debt; Student debt; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economics; Psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.2595370040466756,"score_gpt":0.5447399373471719,"score_spread":0.28520293330049623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892240300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97268844,0.00029385867,0.013691461,0.002773288,0.00002638377,0.000050093484,0.0013602207,0.000040149418,0.009076024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871012,0.00028938564,0.0010294366,0.00013604935,0.000021951093,0.000055424603,0.0004669428,0.0000109207585,0.010888589],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958605,0.00013269896,0.000013413537,0.00006889992,0.0000355452,0.00016334474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983589,0.0007289775,0.0004951592,0.00005022955,0.00007603374,0.00029063388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009430337,0.00036714165,0.00088495365,0.0005535191,0.0006310016,0.001767072,0.0010124549,0.0017416045,0.011799546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003984071,0.0005241568,0.0006598026,0.00064478314,0.0005493912,0.00094941515,0.0012122605,0.0016659596,0.0009948967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006987884,0.0011923361,0.30400518,0.00009789661,0.00015043897,0.0011718613,0.00077605067,0.5883831,0.0015993015,0.06675397,0.006033278,0.029137783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022841226,0.00035775703,0.060050257,0.000053530835,0.000112444046,0.0001911848,0.0008842209,0.9156594,0.00040462395,0.0174459,0.0045519285,0.00006025209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0339212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02429662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0339212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019441545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012953664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06744754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892816536","doi":"","title":"Creating gender-balanced obituaries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VIURRSpace (Vancouver Island University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02114727681396117,"score_gpt":0.2466813081512925,"score_spread":0.22553403133733133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892816536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83939147,0.0010814812,0.030783497,0.009080703,0.0006214927,0.0004958177,0.00017291326,0.00025158923,0.1181211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600928,0.0004278912,0.01946217,0.0005316086,0.000075190124,0.00037126674,0.00011930508,0.0001866574,0.018733168],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909765,0.0066077625,0.00034171517,0.00061534316,0.0007613039,0.0006973915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98173493,0.010944306,0.0018075085,0.0021049809,0.00186944,0.001538707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015071488,0.0005851455,0.00032371812,0.0020613738,0.013326578,0.007415902,0.0017780928,0.0015093955,0.005377539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026299775,0.00035505998,0.0003668395,0.0012480577,0.009392457,0.008438331,0.012799956,0.001881369,0.0008967466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074356016,0.00008701477,0.00507227,0.0002259095,0.000007334218,0.00082574395,0.89487326,0.00021486449,0.0019950224,0.038649827,0.004847244,0.053127225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011744849,0.00009356031,0.00302807,0.00051848707,0.000014990719,0.00029253424,0.7648984,0.00040483382,0.0038197255,0.011063842,0.2158191,0.00003461989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023173753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006213929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015071488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003872114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004310429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07970655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894713174","doi":"10.1007/s11150-020-09535-6","title":"Gender inequality as a barrier to economic growth: a review of the theoretical literature","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation","keywords":"Inequality; Economics; Gender inequality; Human capital; Capital (architecture); Fertility; Neoclassical economics; Positive economics; Development economics; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Population; Geography","score_opus":0.06009120244544467,"score_gpt":0.3301604575159813,"score_spread":0.2700692550705366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894713174","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013600792,0.9985727,0.00005618085,0.0006763929,0.000093882016,0.0000016742616,0.000009972473,0.0000011554416,0.00045204573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011707264,0.9984775,0.00004044965,0.00013484298,0.000111414534,0.0000028269326,0.00000786669,5.225924e-7,0.000053883694],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993819,0.00020345044,0.000073798794,0.00013159546,0.00016185406,0.000047419202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995777,0.0035303356,0.00024014946,0.000042427844,0.00032559034,0.00008442187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021047995,0.0008033518,0.001751828,0.0033700815,0.00056527485,0.0018601649,0.0010333261,0.001653491,0.0046775844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045413603,0.00039882227,0.0007087631,0.0044774464,0.0016305293,0.0021886732,0.0011806402,0.0016095126,0.00077300175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009032711,0.00008234273,0.0014636753,0.060818374,0.0002347194,0.00017229919,0.0003427484,0.0005179348,0.00022799305,0.0327694,0.019161753,0.8841184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023641827,0.00015177861,0.009853741,0.1329704,0.0008304122,0.001349734,0.0016112883,0.0003988121,0.00034427457,0.038186993,0.8141965,0.00008243707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032460592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033637148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046775844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013004744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033879492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015648127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894967857","doi":"","title":"Essays on Parental Leave and Family Labour Supply","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Parental leave; Labour supply; Economics; Business; Work (physics); Engineering","score_opus":0.06987744860244037,"score_gpt":0.31494720414836574,"score_spread":0.24506975554592536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894967857","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035310682,0.3199524,0.0022934224,0.32324636,0.012095875,0.000024283328,0.00068544433,0.000023621862,0.3063678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3789262,0.39599022,0.0010696155,0.019565748,0.026801676,0.00006200655,0.00058927486,0.00007210316,0.17692307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964297,0.00013214376,0.000014579941,0.00005488362,0.00010854104,0.000046934238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977182,0.0017330996,0.00014995958,0.000063058644,0.00021130717,0.0001243301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000777987,0.00037564355,0.00036051494,0.0010988913,0.001747014,0.001718073,0.00056133856,0.0015745462,0.01372141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003493647,0.00022396448,0.00036920913,0.0017325256,0.0021246043,0.002407032,0.001139921,0.0018834549,0.0012336087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009328164,0.00016727051,0.007656943,0.0005583724,0.000031072104,0.0004145139,0.007415032,0.0027092502,0.00021364925,0.5208435,0.35648522,0.1034118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019050462,0.00004368386,0.008853523,0.0015632375,0.0000121997155,0.00015916656,0.0058649816,0.00061097933,0.00009601815,0.12857018,0.8541898,0.00001719194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008410694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062831375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01372141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022628724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001270329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04590267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896525793","doi":"","title":"Female employment and Spousal abuse: A parallel cross-country analysis of developing countries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Endogeneity; Domestic violence; Instrumental variable; Latin Americans; Spouse; East Asia; Demographic economics; Estimation; Developing country; Economics; Geography; Development economics; Poison control; Political science; Economic growth; Suicide prevention; China; Medicine","score_opus":0.023666502585576028,"score_gpt":0.30515756148459483,"score_spread":0.2814910588990188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896525793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986927,0.00036246973,0.000092757735,0.000048103728,0.0000044883145,0.0000096223885,0.00034806386,0.0000010688432,0.00044073205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99837625,0.0005137043,0.00015000557,0.000027177926,0.0000058737273,0.00002225576,0.00063010637,0.0000019570848,0.0002726504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991085,0.000464285,0.00005702604,0.00008020722,0.00006083929,0.00022903275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792457,0.00074484135,0.00063933426,0.00018743909,0.00021703145,0.0002867907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013549564,0.00036073773,0.00067081704,0.001961416,0.00091302337,0.0011453681,0.000278993,0.0003650295,0.0026888712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023364772,0.00034118933,0.0011942362,0.0032119104,0.0004951981,0.00060981297,0.0019424564,0.0006520899,0.00031249126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011459745,0.00012624789,0.9923792,0.000050848143,0.00036764314,0.000352883,0.0012480873,0.00045318983,0.00016809239,0.00035798544,0.0002881774,0.0040931697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008714348,0.00010198599,0.99305457,0.000046301575,0.00011961604,0.00016153687,0.005174547,0.0003116435,0.00010522709,0.00005321153,0.0008551109,0.0000075081266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029150175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021838915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029150175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048169246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051693607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057961047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897956769","doi":"10.3917/anso.182.0341","title":"Satisfaction With Work-Life Balance: Couples with Egalitarian Practices in their Transition to First-Time Parenthood in Spain","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Année sociologique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.02708339911201291,"score_gpt":0.28025070604909635,"score_spread":0.25316730693708345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897956769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99899274,0.00032517104,0.00004532125,0.00010793951,0.0000043687864,0.0000032748112,0.000043289576,6.315028e-7,0.0004772153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994123,0.0001630902,0.000023850398,0.000031674932,0.0000020597804,0.0000047175017,0.00003989363,7.161614e-7,0.00032174157],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993499,0.0003062814,0.000040502793,0.00006847181,0.00007999205,0.00015493353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987362,0.0003825455,0.00047124273,0.00006510443,0.00017261252,0.00017232401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018496907,0.000121867415,0.00032576767,0.0004943506,0.00074406335,0.0015037224,0.0002892447,0.00045428734,0.0017606801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032011592,0.00015803502,0.00025104935,0.00086244213,0.0006460219,0.0005188064,0.0009956895,0.00044898875,0.00013364539],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026390888,0.00013426841,0.9112538,0.000073361494,0.000059361697,0.0004232422,0.06704269,0.0000969427,0.00045339068,0.00027029694,0.00032309748,0.019605624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086611035,0.00011276174,0.89556146,0.000042846696,0.000012995312,0.0001613562,0.101914115,0.0000618703,0.00009651628,0.00010426925,0.0019126736,0.000010479856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024511278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028179849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024511278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011753769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085997424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048737228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899005368","doi":"10.1111/caje.12358","title":"Group income and individual preferences for redistribution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Redistribution of income and wealth; Ethnic group; Demographic economics; Robustness (evolution); Economics; Survey data collection; Sample (material); Microeconomics; Statistics; Mathematics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.12883638545848816,"score_gpt":0.22232503462768619,"score_spread":0.09348864916919802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899005368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916347,0.00006955634,0.00026254696,0.00018932023,0.0000036588779,0.0000048039806,0.00004725,0.000002569777,0.007785523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957424,0.000017424145,0.000049188064,0.000011728693,0.000002182319,0.0000014261831,0.000015252713,4.339734e-7,0.00032821472],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928313,0.00040794254,0.000024762734,0.00005960507,0.00011944941,0.0001051232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953229,0.0021552725,0.0014272134,0.00036041203,0.00027264393,0.0004615626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001381297,0.00011841702,0.00018258533,0.0006517581,0.00037601814,0.0007090975,0.00013671097,0.00029860143,0.0070873965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005632548,0.00005131443,0.00014370013,0.0005443422,0.0006153985,0.00032475241,0.0004804648,0.0003333131,0.0003452139],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002670412,0.00031541576,0.9695346,0.000033150325,0.00013235847,0.00014121826,0.0012830484,0.0015662952,0.00071060314,0.0081025865,0.0006715541,0.017242258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026604595,0.0002168822,0.9813648,0.000030938074,0.00004124882,0.00017463794,0.00323639,0.0018443762,0.00040577765,0.009924002,0.002718431,0.000015899745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012230158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018501837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070873965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000316968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014152088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023709774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900049453","doi":"","title":"La politique des services de garde à 5 $/jour et l'offre de travail des mères québécoises : résultats d'une expérience naturelle canadienne","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Subsidy; Political science; Geography; Demography; Socioeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012122150418794747,"score_gpt":0.24188807839116677,"score_spread":0.22976592797237202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900049453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96606475,0.0011580868,0.00014165738,0.0029501684,0.000056198594,0.00013577803,0.00032887582,0.0000073508018,0.02915707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96103036,0.0011270501,0.00021942068,0.00083867996,0.000018303803,0.00016753888,0.00021223603,0.000011552963,0.036374826],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957131,0.0012367958,0.00009881734,0.0003610347,0.00085158215,0.0017386844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927408,0.0019946077,0.000514687,0.00020385183,0.0017543581,0.0027918064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004029049,0.00038357687,0.0006401632,0.0013867803,0.01649205,0.005340973,0.0011815093,0.0016309749,0.012663488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007700433,0.00040434522,0.0003942449,0.0036281075,0.005915865,0.0020171374,0.0045714527,0.0024448724,0.00065062277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018971224,0.0005698417,0.08321857,0.00035791006,0.000051148865,0.0009640448,0.8602074,0.00025158544,0.00059878465,0.0061506294,0.009021714,0.038418733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024192277,0.00016303096,0.16442324,0.0003824064,0.000035262256,0.00006780856,0.7905897,0.00008939384,0.00015283038,0.00036474928,0.043651447,0.00005601619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9631464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054073013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054073013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0597258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39232904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901874934","doi":"10.1111/jomf.12542","title":"Use of Parental Benefits by Family Income in Canada: Two Policy Changes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marriage and the Family","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Multinomial logistic regression; Demographic economics; Socioeconomic status; Context (archaeology); Affect (linguistics); Economic inequality; Inequality; Economics; Public economics; Family income; Psychology; Demography; Economic growth; Geography; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.027326870571218256,"score_gpt":0.2677443644127424,"score_spread":0.24041749384152417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901874934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663998,0.0041595893,0.0007204759,0.0133083705,0.00009771406,0.00014655026,0.0046410677,0.00007013208,0.01045636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98944926,0.0015702998,0.0012386735,0.0019842584,0.000028449751,0.00008906565,0.0013965976,0.000014090285,0.004229439],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960884,0.00050282036,0.00013102088,0.0003759771,0.0012338801,0.00166797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99376726,0.0009924005,0.00086791645,0.00030128457,0.0022483235,0.0018227876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003592095,0.0003036107,0.00036458258,0.0014680106,0.0041006613,0.0018924122,0.0020145932,0.0009958508,0.001958832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010026,0.00028039966,0.0008403403,0.0029160788,0.001287631,0.0005722296,0.0015355555,0.0016050915,0.00009383739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007618806,0.00050212914,0.82688445,0.00028017454,0.00024471237,0.0004335312,0.006603766,0.00617408,0.0011822243,0.013647599,0.01937728,0.123908214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045923836,0.000070204966,0.98088765,0.0001221836,0.000057586516,0.000037035235,0.0019048215,0.0017853358,0.00040530218,0.00031909428,0.0143226255,0.000042327847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14645451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14645451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15951917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9899918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902028335","doi":"10.24908/eoe-ese-rse.v19i0.11930","title":"The Rise and Limits of Education Policy. Gendered Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Human capital; Education policy; Economic growth; State (computer science); Education economics; Politics; Economics; Higher education; Development economics; Sociology; Political science; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.015490199385378286,"score_gpt":0.30676369909169743,"score_spread":0.29127349970631916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902028335","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012221283,0.118327096,0.0051155887,0.49080813,0.002377119,0.000021839563,0.0001493111,0.00006593977,0.37091377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7917354,0.049848597,0.0034521457,0.08300039,0.0044172984,0.00011301254,0.00012380566,0.00009757427,0.06721178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941351,0.0026663295,0.00015887624,0.0009950915,0.0012331316,0.0008114577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99380445,0.0039667664,0.0005247064,0.00043543123,0.00060317095,0.000665536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067034317,0.00043345278,0.00037618377,0.0014381505,0.004975995,0.010707736,0.00071057724,0.006765668,0.009354622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010715168,0.00029511773,0.00031092693,0.0016802617,0.029469183,0.012076366,0.005184027,0.007539177,0.0011422047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068506015,0.0000059251183,0.00014632447,0.00002920793,0.0000011107535,0.000013065734,0.0011187871,0.000054827004,0.00003091758,0.979479,0.0060607833,0.013053137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062392737,0.000015754615,0.00064241997,0.0005483536,0.0000028355212,0.000056974637,0.0017796205,0.00012622595,0.00009911709,0.5955685,0.401143,0.000011009764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008214493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007704996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012823978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012823978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008307293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09304494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902196616","doi":"10.4054/demres.2020.43.28","title":"Explaining the MENA paradox: Rising educational attainment yet stagnant female labor force participation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demographic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Educational attainment; Phenomenon; Closing (real estate); Demographic economics; Economics; Gender gap; Labour economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.13473104100963626,"score_gpt":0.41903304603449665,"score_spread":0.28430200502486036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902196616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96372974,0.0019858526,0.0070088883,0.01536991,0.000075248194,0.000032766926,0.00056800345,0.00006244616,0.011167077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987797,0.00017517411,0.00030698164,0.00024569588,0.000015931182,0.0000062554527,0.000052191128,0.00000434527,0.00041364084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945635,0.00025493835,0.000023407614,0.00010250777,0.000048965296,0.000113855436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968394,0.0015380835,0.0010124715,0.00015320936,0.00021173077,0.00024511732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023287681,0.00029878085,0.00037284824,0.00098489,0.0007002128,0.0013278339,0.0007262591,0.0008335651,0.005246862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072168773,0.00016601077,0.00032241008,0.0009773574,0.0013368216,0.0012920476,0.001414028,0.0007369161,0.00032800648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018819513,0.000114144364,0.87785786,0.0003165509,0.00014668242,0.0014992844,0.004305106,0.013565074,0.0005259125,0.06752539,0.0058134543,0.028142286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008945654,0.00020171207,0.66948193,0.00041786427,0.00015821982,0.0011409179,0.02377155,0.10158384,0.0010091786,0.18108913,0.020981932,0.00007419738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021557199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017591735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021557199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013540618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015075842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04286349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902197083","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3253481","title":"Can Economic Pressure Overcome Social Norms? The Case of Female Labor Force Participation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Social pressure; Political science; Labour economics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.014984830185249614,"score_gpt":0.2977956472416119,"score_spread":0.2828108170563623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902197083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7105088,0.0005408155,0.0015067606,0.042872276,0.0001711868,0.00005574863,0.00006129075,0.00000742118,0.24427572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99605536,0.00010719571,0.000086355336,0.0007451484,0.00007035807,0.000023337487,0.0000057986044,0.0000041622434,0.0029022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945378,0.002638577,0.00006387795,0.00024923013,0.000372608,0.002137869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933962,0.0038483157,0.00075241376,0.00038161088,0.00040778282,0.0012136669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00693469,0.00034985476,0.000574425,0.00119428,0.009482345,0.0058116145,0.0014296595,0.0057550874,0.012348667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013140549,0.0002491009,0.00049614446,0.0011311091,0.015636146,0.0040136506,0.0051315837,0.0031285149,0.0003510433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033546498,0.00038019705,0.04528726,0.000103492814,0.00005217701,0.007165707,0.13966872,0.00052289467,0.00083333085,0.77089626,0.004938115,0.02981631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029787602,0.00033640803,0.07386732,0.00041975075,0.00008590025,0.002821525,0.48797032,0.0026115305,0.0007716335,0.34967303,0.081039816,0.00010495601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021885652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023411402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021885652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002377963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036348344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043516576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902407228","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3211428","title":"More or Less Unmarried. The Impact of Legal Settings of Cohabitation on Labor Market Outcomes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Labour economics; Economics; Business; Demographic economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012548757917304953,"score_gpt":0.3203991661046573,"score_spread":0.3078504081873523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902407228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914185,0.0005175731,0.000051764735,0.00044540703,0.000050555333,0.00001536704,0.0007608354,0.0000037186644,0.00673622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968033,0.00024537178,0.000030258381,0.000133104,0.000031541396,0.000011936139,0.00031735064,0.0000018152119,0.0024253787],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973685,0.00005815606,0.00001343515,0.00003365558,0.00005388681,0.00010397817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875724,0.00013890339,0.0005362022,0.00004683085,0.00006679438,0.0004539454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039174085,0.0001275925,0.00020884305,0.0004941412,0.0010208387,0.00067205715,0.00037514433,0.00028412734,0.018675487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002705829,0.000092057686,0.0003084145,0.00049933366,0.00040210233,0.00052923296,0.00094270933,0.0009204947,0.00088781514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006110405,0.00047185723,0.9549491,0.000060593014,0.00012290821,0.00041512074,0.0010779522,0.000064462925,0.00047639236,0.0014023347,0.002360209,0.037988063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020307209,0.0003168993,0.9927256,0.000065103406,0.000044284097,0.00037730325,0.003392266,0.0001331691,0.0001556195,0.0006139982,0.0021455663,0.000009871812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009334176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01922809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018675487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021193305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043763279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06247568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902525722","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2017-064","title":"Can “Self-Financing” Redeem the Basic Income Guarantee? Disincentives, Efficiency Cost, Tax Burdens, and Attitudes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Public economics; Economics; Work (physics); Incentive; Finance; Earnings; Poverty; Income tax; Poverty trap; Business; Labour economics; Economic growth; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.01725285502479722,"score_gpt":0.27348976442708856,"score_spread":0.2562369094022913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902525722","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15500534,0.0069684265,0.021688325,0.44512445,0.0017349359,0.00021479827,0.00023017234,0.0001794433,0.3688541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9315635,0.0021767665,0.005375762,0.026661664,0.0007971766,0.00007289296,0.00007883368,0.000057228746,0.033216275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929189,0.002074373,0.00013645201,0.00034520432,0.0026182423,0.0019067967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940778,0.0023507779,0.00067302474,0.0008259656,0.0012257035,0.00084680197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009129256,0.0003253831,0.00033433977,0.0012573046,0.0031726314,0.005825657,0.0017341502,0.0042325216,0.005622809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026370004,0.00025766817,0.00051455817,0.0009317287,0.014214486,0.0055463864,0.003598183,0.004395526,0.00037282155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017408502,0.000023696773,0.003045686,0.000027807673,0.000007045339,0.000033640612,0.00083509635,0.00032822212,0.00013942052,0.96285945,0.007595572,0.02508699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008573463,0.0001627516,0.022148885,0.0005117846,0.000034514385,0.00018185955,0.0035318115,0.002453714,0.0008528372,0.50239414,0.46752387,0.000118029115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14110509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21126023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85889494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017251045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023879157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28056753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903384437","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2018.11.008","title":"Work-family policy and female entrepreneurship: Evidence from China's subsidized child care program","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"China Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Fogarty International Center; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Ministry of Health, British Columbia","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Subsidy; China; Work (physics); Child care; Economic growth; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Business; Economics; Political science; Nursing; Market economy; Medicine; Finance","score_opus":0.031928713194097874,"score_gpt":0.3225747982861258,"score_spread":0.29064608509202794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903384437","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43694752,0.5425349,0.00012415311,0.0072364784,0.0002778635,0.000088516084,0.0013429932,0.000007573749,0.011440021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77129143,0.2255116,0.00011745678,0.0010794925,0.00015637586,0.000054556982,0.0006219801,0.0000034744849,0.0011636908],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899644,0.0003972143,0.00008802895,0.000071768314,0.00022650899,0.0002201002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958561,0.0021013613,0.0010747113,0.000114704,0.00046268274,0.00039041872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028239083,0.0003248676,0.0006994345,0.0028587761,0.0007361142,0.0012735284,0.00067043136,0.00060425943,0.00384772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050779213,0.00014376249,0.0006986055,0.004782552,0.00070103374,0.0005595242,0.00087775214,0.0005610553,0.000119881515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015085568,0.0008383133,0.46403766,0.016955726,0.0020968239,0.00078171963,0.0025591333,0.0007766326,0.00033152816,0.0086129755,0.015008119,0.48649284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001776018,0.0003700096,0.9515702,0.0062287906,0.002559463,0.00013764479,0.003979395,0.00023570123,0.00021099507,0.00087911426,0.033623256,0.000027813487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058977563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12516129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058977563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002242216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008089413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11726856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903657392","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2018-043","title":"Is Canada Ready for Real Poverty Reduction through a Universal Guaranteed Basic Income? A Rejoinder to Kesselman’s “Can ‘Self-Financing’ Redeem the Basic Income Guarantee? Disincentives, Efficiency Costs, Tax Burdens, and Attitudes”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Basic income; Poverty; Economics; Public economics; Poverty reduction; Basic needs; Decile; Tax credit; Income tax; Economic growth","score_opus":0.019566879677710522,"score_gpt":0.27669408677036283,"score_spread":0.2571272070926523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903657392","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029232815,0.0041289306,0.005218071,0.8654479,0.001710049,0.00010299778,0.0006934842,0.00013656367,0.09332923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6100922,0.006644268,0.015650973,0.24376658,0.00054862176,0.00016194601,0.00032265714,0.00016159688,0.12265112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99480313,0.00076162285,0.00010139303,0.00041083375,0.0019296597,0.001993258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99520737,0.0007371943,0.00018390469,0.0003022851,0.001708688,0.0018605308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004393371,0.00030546365,0.00042086942,0.0007739467,0.012258082,0.0058664368,0.0025220143,0.005510907,0.008724447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012096567,0.00038991892,0.00062772323,0.0013706727,0.008391639,0.003847746,0.003593956,0.0076864036,0.0004991105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006486605,0.00005159237,0.0046914862,0.000116028605,0.000029079942,0.00022788123,0.0036092894,0.00046444254,0.0006427793,0.77997327,0.17427978,0.035849445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006254166,0.00007555369,0.0123326965,0.00024219321,0.000032858312,0.0001082966,0.004679031,0.00085703365,0.00092347007,0.056452524,0.92405397,0.0001799017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9716314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98273337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07507293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07507293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19459927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5446948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904911200","doi":"10.1080/10875549.2018.1550132","title":"First Birth before First Stable Employment and Subsequent Single-Mother “Disconnection” before and after the Welfare Reform and Great Recession","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Disconnection; Single mothers; Welfare reform; Recession; Welfare; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Economics; Food stamps; Labour economics; Psychology; Political science; Geography; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.014568594646593287,"score_gpt":0.2535100237917659,"score_spread":0.2389414291451726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904911200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987282,0.00014809692,0.00003628696,0.00018017748,0.0000066149055,0.0000044210283,0.0005064383,0.0000014694328,0.0003880724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978643,0.00014049772,0.000035119574,0.00006093948,0.000008808795,0.000013717131,0.0013014217,0.0000018930191,0.0005732545],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931145,0.000119944794,0.000039748906,0.00012605448,0.00006494555,0.00033779192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655944,0.00046538588,0.0019999577,0.00013008494,0.0001715753,0.0006735541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080120284,0.00017985144,0.00030998245,0.00085568905,0.00096835644,0.0009611777,0.00060889305,0.0008658214,0.0037483769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003893191,0.00027261896,0.000535779,0.0011217474,0.00052045076,0.0009615536,0.0020732728,0.0014834066,0.0004743743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016683793,0.00006394798,0.9952844,0.000016883972,0.00004770391,0.00013114243,0.0009629612,0.00011104129,0.000084507185,0.00017651351,0.0004675423,0.0024865726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003467053,0.000036935548,0.99772805,0.000017081307,0.000015160573,0.00004905645,0.0015883261,0.00010854553,0.000045809138,0.000039180875,0.00036484216,0.0000036150832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056638777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08303894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056638777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008398119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091001537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11261821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906200385","doi":"","title":"Essays on Gender and the Macroeconomy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.03644541286981632,"score_gpt":0.2930866861368607,"score_spread":0.25664127326704433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906200385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022926793,0.11444782,0.008540428,0.24972892,0.021793563,0.00006244123,0.00077009265,0.000065928,0.58166397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28583902,0.11645275,0.0066315364,0.03291344,0.032400277,0.00020959307,0.00067074096,0.0001955185,0.5246871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994394,0.00019376834,0.00002105076,0.00008940078,0.00018538271,0.00007092116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778026,0.0015697067,0.00016951845,0.00011190624,0.0002493619,0.000119349184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001192125,0.00047802928,0.0002923997,0.0008374442,0.0018748199,0.0032015808,0.00059727527,0.0013202853,0.010591845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004078382,0.00015809922,0.0004592514,0.0011346791,0.0038270114,0.0025413528,0.00158888,0.0021038344,0.0014978361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021658456,0.000026497979,0.0007608654,0.00017868925,0.000011954617,0.000094728886,0.004479245,0.00038718982,0.00023846135,0.77040434,0.19396444,0.029431859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005254164,0.000014340263,0.0016133183,0.00054392917,0.0000053370886,0.00005668105,0.0013760214,0.00018766416,0.00012228018,0.11660941,0.8794587,0.0000070575525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018016857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025425327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010591845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020281659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019332792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035433233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907409907","doi":"10.1093/wbro/lkz005","title":"What Explains Uneven Female Labor Force Participation Levels and Trends in Developing Countries?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The World Bank Research Observer","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":272,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Zinc Association; Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation","keywords":"Feminization (sociology); Latin Americans; Economics; Shock (circulatory); Fertility; Demographic economics; Sex segregation; Developing country; Socioeconomic status; Labour economics; Development economics; Political science; Economic growth; Population; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.1620433601857993,"score_gpt":0.4181338667332136,"score_spread":0.25609050654741433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907409907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98792404,0.002719807,0.00013587854,0.0022930205,0.00002701542,0.000010586404,0.001528899,0.000005749847,0.00535516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986947,0.0007233746,0.000045013916,0.00009615495,0.000015661546,0.000007938505,0.00023961229,0.0000025551901,0.00017494701],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946886,0.00015094347,0.000044691333,0.00008678616,0.000042774373,0.00020595435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998531,0.0004444278,0.000526187,0.00010163119,0.00018415425,0.000212674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011649532,0.00012239847,0.0002557449,0.0015260449,0.00047973832,0.00066796824,0.00033902534,0.00028034858,0.004259466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037082606,0.00016482058,0.00021974754,0.0028157025,0.0007766792,0.00060308794,0.0006098967,0.00037213502,0.000338506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044968012,0.000015880503,0.98197466,0.00008401676,0.00003285531,0.00009678362,0.0022983903,0.00009437956,0.00010441527,0.0009937146,0.00091407174,0.0133458255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002354852,0.000015885453,0.9928231,0.00010778317,0.0000068316162,0.00009323151,0.004660582,0.00007641419,0.000037584752,0.00029223185,0.00187978,0.0000041595404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018373271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01665686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018373271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004694799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004927231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0365327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908388078","doi":"","title":"État des lieux sur les écarts de revenus entre les parents et les femmes et hommes sans enfant au Québec et dans le reste du Canada","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04636896854772139,"score_gpt":0.3145262334317922,"score_spread":0.2681572648840708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908388078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93606234,0.0110507505,0.001205796,0.01470782,0.00018153292,0.00004855606,0.0037809242,0.000026892007,0.032935336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766151,0.005054146,0.0007768782,0.0010396255,0.000029182189,0.000037881215,0.00078497425,0.000020179126,0.015642053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722797,0.0006608169,0.0000865716,0.0003693741,0.0008437553,0.00081152486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98782724,0.0019997375,0.0012065528,0.00028055653,0.0071023977,0.0015835437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031742502,0.0003145609,0.00043621505,0.0029278148,0.008834636,0.0030966217,0.00095089717,0.0007861025,0.009343604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007196949,0.00033903102,0.00040776044,0.0049707023,0.0031528252,0.0012504988,0.0015836835,0.0017027071,0.00026073004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031801095,0.000061019535,0.7086578,0.00048680344,0.0002560712,0.0009391175,0.15516734,0.00052293297,0.001012727,0.01800211,0.01917654,0.09539944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009279165,0.000039647042,0.84290165,0.00054612017,0.00008570134,0.00012858855,0.10919379,0.00024401913,0.00030223443,0.0005300258,0.045937195,0.00008172315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99793375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04859429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04859429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058987156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35257787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909802873","doi":"","title":"DCF Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF) Claimed Funds By Program, Provider and Calendar Quarter","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reimbursement; Quarter (Canadian coin); Audit; Business; Government (linguistics); Actuarial science; Accounting; Economics; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.017083291692734832,"score_gpt":0.29638012387880164,"score_spread":0.2792968321860668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909802873","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00058238726,0.000033526027,0.000040145613,0.00010365659,0.000021962847,0.000008873521,0.9986657,0.00010009959,0.00044361223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010519868,0.000039774095,0.00016263938,0.00005501896,0.000009462667,0.00005843783,0.9975702,0.000021797046,0.0010306045],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989911,0.00014299228,0.00010216762,0.00026454384,0.0002976111,0.00020160165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693656,0.0006729523,0.0005349242,0.0005244138,0.00095172157,0.00037941535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010177351,0.0015733255,0.0009629678,0.0034793168,0.0008663276,0.0018785193,0.002471111,0.0021594441,0.033181682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00768436,0.00055935944,0.0011850953,0.005139816,0.00043347754,0.0010845027,0.0018001102,0.0018463676,0.031090438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008716087,0.000050897153,0.005739661,0.00021767798,0.00003481556,0.000027273541,0.000037449623,0.00041157042,0.000050082792,0.00054006506,0.9904128,0.0023905723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047173013,0.000047754987,0.04742554,0.00049007294,0.000047888614,0.00012180181,0.00034422532,0.0017347746,0.000383616,0.0012291402,0.947646,0.000057502188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08498806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14335446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08498806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023652967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031624264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16898674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909938830","doi":"10.1108/ijm-11-2017-0298","title":"Can pay gaps between gay men and lesbians shed light on male–female pay gaps?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Manpower","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Gender pay gap; Lesbian; Gender gap; Originality; Wage; Demographic economics; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Gender discrimination; Social psychology; Gender studies; Labour economics; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01674220929390084,"score_gpt":0.2963823042905914,"score_spread":0.27964009499669057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909938830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993471,0.0011539371,0.0005396071,0.0008633239,0.000047201946,0.000011161028,0.00020014495,0.000003341587,0.003710259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992835,0.00011320836,0.00011754218,0.00011883611,0.0000198318,0.000011160325,0.00007404601,0.0000016140976,0.0002604583],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978004,0.0010896331,0.0000978949,0.00022299557,0.00042099375,0.0003680922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917489,0.004340425,0.002150227,0.00042642868,0.000510744,0.0008233691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00446212,0.0003028143,0.00049710565,0.0014380381,0.00093708694,0.0014799844,0.0005237105,0.00064829417,0.004930327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016684601,0.00016393937,0.00035787752,0.0011482063,0.0010035296,0.0017254724,0.0020293177,0.0010832491,0.00046456716],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036674147,0.00020012486,0.9522623,0.00010913272,0.00009046541,0.00011449453,0.006740772,0.00019250943,0.00020328432,0.0041619367,0.00057208457,0.034986213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008521256,0.00025964333,0.96974844,0.00015306969,0.00003579835,0.00019830765,0.022364963,0.00077442033,0.00026254516,0.003923185,0.0022571818,0.000014130457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057917256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006766738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057917256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000535266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086459384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023598254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911459977","doi":"10.29173/cjfy29453","title":"Book Review of: Scott, Laura S. (2009). Two is Enough: A Couple’s Guide to Living Childless by Choice. Berkeley: Seal Press.","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Family and Youth / Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la Jeunesse","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Seal (emblem); Art history; Gerontology; Art; Visual arts; Medicine","score_opus":0.012102843970915723,"score_gpt":0.2709017322928866,"score_spread":0.2587988883219709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911459977","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029311812,0.72640663,0.00077395735,0.06494412,0.04839609,0.00009034344,0.002051222,0.0003034759,0.15674102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002615681,0.3361663,0.0007662963,0.028394016,0.0135607105,0.000090990085,0.0013242383,0.00028231306,0.6167994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949646,0.00005955699,0.00004210957,0.000064368585,0.0002950739,0.00004244506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980192,0.00064547535,0.00012293886,0.00005639458,0.00093473407,0.00022127158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076560775,0.0011538189,0.0012642901,0.0034735252,0.0011744071,0.0025026225,0.001751161,0.002136211,0.13994947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034091256,0.00057457504,0.0005740747,0.0039789844,0.0008467848,0.0034314836,0.0015512399,0.0029832076,0.09801519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036315207,0.0000030318167,0.000025572795,0.0001377889,0.0000012764358,0.000021059597,0.000040321305,0.000010513748,0.0000140843595,0.00035978403,0.9756275,0.023755452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019853342,0.0000026038797,0.0001694912,0.0003195136,0.0000020223802,0.0000849677,0.00004676565,0.000006396293,0.0000125788365,0.00018993577,0.9991604,0.0000033383694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018954715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058291018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13994947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001986025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033966575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46817762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912252502","doi":"10.29173/cjfy29437","title":"Book Review of: Scott, Laura S. (2009). Two is Enough: A Couple’s Guide to Living Childless by Choice. Berkeley: Seal Press.","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Family and Youth / Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la Jeunesse","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Seal (emblem); Art history; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.012102843970915723,"score_gpt":0.2709017322928866,"score_spread":0.2587988883219709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912252502","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036932656,0.7525987,0.0010339092,0.056996316,0.039388694,0.00009673477,0.0017292179,0.0003222986,0.14746487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029304777,0.3630958,0.0010235149,0.024087679,0.0106808385,0.000100965284,0.0011943732,0.00029560583,0.59659076],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995121,0.00006604279,0.000038102455,0.000059275735,0.00028661866,0.00003785457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981236,0.00067825895,0.00011858718,0.00005382059,0.0008148742,0.00021073803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079246843,0.0011484344,0.00120044,0.0029660382,0.0011109478,0.0023706905,0.0015125968,0.0019273254,0.12546152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032127926,0.0005657877,0.00050618674,0.0033987404,0.0008087326,0.003279281,0.0014971587,0.0026776346,0.08638932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004575586,0.000003896612,0.0000304767,0.00015420564,0.000001383042,0.000023692966,0.00006176252,0.000012738489,0.000021376722,0.00042182836,0.9657485,0.033515714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021578683,0.000003969541,0.0001925685,0.0003106015,0.0000020652215,0.00009229111,0.0000630327,0.00000740997,0.00001573104,0.00023760539,0.9990687,0.0000038184817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016263578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049929325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12546152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016831926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003116768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41971058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913222727","doi":"10.1080/00220388.2020.1790533","title":"What Drives Female Labour Force Participation? Comparable Micro-level Evidence from Eight Developing and Emerging Economies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Development Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development, UK Government; International Development Research Centre; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation","keywords":"Emerging markets; Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.14258095856238134,"score_gpt":0.3533964882710734,"score_spread":0.21081552970869205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913222727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977113,0.00037657534,0.000043752978,0.00014955965,0.0000014030011,0.000004886929,0.00022745175,4.2992488e-7,0.0014847221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936825,0.0003354208,0.000025374136,0.000021482525,0.000002132542,0.0000032742867,0.00010584471,3.8660357e-7,0.00013779565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976987,0.000073476665,0.000012949232,0.000034363544,0.000024154819,0.000085096755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911624,0.0002918691,0.00037408317,0.000049740047,0.00007386732,0.00009417944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000621766,0.00011594023,0.00017420165,0.0007461861,0.00037412002,0.00051864766,0.00019429484,0.00015445746,0.0018214172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015198049,0.00010056026,0.0001829996,0.0011769605,0.00053116883,0.00033519,0.0006822245,0.0002818916,0.0001641399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036089394,0.000024439272,0.99003905,0.0000541844,0.000041218766,0.00013146213,0.0025870067,0.0001117028,0.00021999374,0.00055866427,0.00012864826,0.0060674483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002461115,0.000017250499,0.9946083,0.000033140277,0.000011651528,0.000038953724,0.0043693637,0.00005766284,0.00005977773,0.00008605021,0.00071355596,0.0000018332361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027568227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05628766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027568227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002958911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030911982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05481553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913299972","doi":"","title":"Gender Equality and Taxation: The Question of the Childcare Expenses Deduction (Égalité des genres : fiscalité et ‘garde d’enfants’ s’accordent-elles au féminin ?)","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Presumption; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Economics; Political science; Tax deduction; Welfare economics; Tax reform; Public economics; Law; State income tax; Gross income","score_opus":0.02936432652040478,"score_gpt":0.3198502235560697,"score_spread":0.2904858970356649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913299972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0465915,0.1028786,0.0030553057,0.41727728,0.0051451796,0.00003214455,0.0006131316,0.000030232311,0.4243766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91038895,0.023056364,0.0008995838,0.01559844,0.0018807624,0.00002167198,0.00010575198,0.000040934297,0.048007555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854004,0.00045655944,0.00004748941,0.00014286382,0.00042826153,0.00038472074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873513,0.00055401574,0.00010849315,0.00005027369,0.00045790963,0.000094189854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002259899,0.00034756458,0.0002949546,0.0010573766,0.007344304,0.0063270717,0.00096706377,0.0021472014,0.004152975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047521656,0.00017189249,0.00027346812,0.001790039,0.013553891,0.0030124835,0.0011267896,0.0028019925,0.00033756933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011264077,0.0000035761352,0.00056267425,0.000055443412,0.0000028941236,0.0000786743,0.009848897,0.000059320588,0.000065810615,0.9538568,0.02832467,0.0071299775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009361858,0.000015216447,0.01364926,0.000912141,0.000016338648,0.00026980095,0.02900978,0.0003736309,0.00044496253,0.20190592,0.75334185,0.000051630414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82693344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80543333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82693344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036406513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017055683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34817153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913456727","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.49.2.203","title":"Men’s and Women’s Marriage and Cohabitation Earnings Gaps in Comparative Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Earnings; Context (archaeology); Demographic economics; Economics; Perspective (graphical); Scarcity; Matching (statistics); Labour economics; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.0643673780994849,"score_gpt":0.38054902253582684,"score_spread":0.31618164443634195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913456727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716271,0.0076423655,0.00023054196,0.0015073953,0.00006216265,0.000007233306,0.00038061198,0.0000022968366,0.01854036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99712235,0.0018033505,0.0000836413,0.000100705234,0.000058070887,0.0000053177077,0.000166955,0.0000017226572,0.00065776403],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992305,0.00041162453,0.000021407499,0.00006797854,0.00009656227,0.00017186494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884856,0.000596662,0.00021132114,0.000058528392,0.00011068872,0.00017412916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019058709,0.00012377025,0.00030792327,0.0025254162,0.0013074471,0.00104955,0.00029033437,0.00024828003,0.0073724184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034432723,0.00007779214,0.00024623895,0.0031723282,0.0009907915,0.0013785188,0.0012683384,0.0003599308,0.00015606702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000384482,0.00018396304,0.7622073,0.0002503635,0.0003707511,0.00090462394,0.06533474,0.0003674683,0.00028546306,0.07333248,0.0047304886,0.09164782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061405794,0.00010541543,0.9409094,0.00020446171,0.00008189212,0.00022702667,0.042372767,0.0002096534,0.00010602601,0.00430709,0.011460053,0.000010187164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022931658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04760342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022931658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095424516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005201455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04559636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913644440","doi":"10.29173/cjfy29431","title":"Book Review of: Scott, Laura S. (2009). Two is Enough: A Couple’s Guide to Living Childless by Choice. Berkeley: Seal Press.","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Family and Youth / Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la Jeunesse","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Seal (emblem); Gerontology; Art history; Sociology; History; Medicine; Archaeology","score_opus":0.012102843970915723,"score_gpt":0.2709017322928866,"score_spread":0.2587988883219709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913644440","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036755632,0.73532027,0.0009813174,0.06439882,0.035251923,0.00009821511,0.0013947278,0.00028278978,0.16190444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031667356,0.35014418,0.0010511158,0.03791735,0.009464497,0.00013107278,0.0011426692,0.00029536244,0.596687],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994753,0.00007846152,0.000043810738,0.000056781668,0.00030412682,0.000041432006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982533,0.0006575383,0.000120598605,0.000046448942,0.0007182927,0.0002038908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007963929,0.0010994483,0.0010528272,0.0024057662,0.0012453592,0.0023215848,0.0016223212,0.002197184,0.11284531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033255466,0.00054836133,0.00046754704,0.0029026472,0.0008262384,0.0035843074,0.0015888088,0.0032226741,0.07250201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004207841,0.0000042061083,0.000026690723,0.0001665414,0.0000012205793,0.000026887186,0.00009628276,0.000010069684,0.000016786513,0.0005020676,0.9708191,0.028325919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021416606,0.0000035708392,0.00016184755,0.00034042966,0.0000017752045,0.000107064,0.00008773974,0.000005719331,0.000010529015,0.00021795258,0.9990577,0.000003555846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016534626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047442917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11284531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00165591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034901828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37750512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914382174","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.47.4.441","title":"Gender and Cultural Identity Work of Unmarried Indian Breadwinner Daughters in South Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Negotiation; Identity (music); Power (physics); Sociology; Identity negotiation; Social science","score_opus":0.11547251347579758,"score_gpt":0.36304172996944073,"score_spread":0.24756921649364316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914382174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974439,0.00027489764,0.000025328345,0.00027723899,0.000013230192,0.0000044854733,0.0000072259404,0.0000012479322,0.0019523647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817014,0.0004507969,0.000042491658,0.00007851899,0.000006280288,0.0000061593746,0.000007656355,0.0000020839489,0.001235791],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905425,0.0004810543,0.000027373584,0.0000695445,0.00009376003,0.00027401152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989002,0.0003932056,0.00022404543,0.000044706474,0.000098610595,0.0003392545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014603275,0.00035818864,0.00046098058,0.00096689473,0.008112414,0.0031927866,0.0006020861,0.0005597965,0.002548732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031406512,0.00038080063,0.0001692385,0.00067574304,0.0046064816,0.0013767056,0.0037166432,0.0013273219,0.00019579339],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003939765,0.00003648103,0.023946216,0.000023598126,0.0000040297164,0.0011312106,0.968597,0.000007458539,0.00058874313,0.00064980896,0.00018614011,0.004789959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013605969,0.000029008646,0.009520745,0.000020442138,0.0000026608598,0.0002744953,0.9881682,0.000008231902,0.000082291204,0.00004954984,0.0018391758,0.0000037725436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02286224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05023146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02286224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019206611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016390246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045458376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914538807","doi":"10.1111/fare.12351","title":"Use It or Lose It? Predicting Learning Transfer of Relationship and Marriage Education Among Child Welfare Professionals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Relations","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Psychology; Low Confidence; Structural equation modeling; Sample (material); Self-efficacy; Medical education; Transfer of learning; Developmental psychology; Transfer of training; Social psychology; Medicine; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.03259530524194708,"score_gpt":0.30102851490913896,"score_spread":0.26843320966719186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914538807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99951434,0.000037573976,0.000050113897,0.00009312694,0.0000025455397,0.0000109603125,0.000018474911,0.0000020238297,0.00027080002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935836,0.000063107334,0.00017984897,0.000025103394,0.0000038319104,0.00002447384,0.00005850903,8.5381697e-7,0.0002858954],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991223,0.00027451882,0.00006126405,0.00009067643,0.0002475045,0.0002037725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906301,0.003625096,0.0030715542,0.00031826991,0.00069534505,0.0016596457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003777426,0.00022219995,0.00024878333,0.0005847082,0.0005423224,0.00087705324,0.00044769788,0.00094309385,0.002362745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019270223,0.0002862121,0.00042942393,0.00032987146,0.00047786185,0.00060644175,0.0009852003,0.0015115488,0.0003328952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067927096,0.0009223405,0.98405993,0.000022023001,0.000024023762,0.000032218522,0.001519759,0.00019603464,0.00017641965,0.00003643873,0.00018759012,0.012755343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005195937,0.0002316982,0.997017,0.000030599844,0.000010518898,0.000032424596,0.0015809535,0.0007183767,0.00013829884,0.000050001843,0.00017918632,0.0000056552603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067338436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010599499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067338436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006551179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007664743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019977212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914873285","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.043","title":"Unconditional cash transfers and parental obesity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Body mass index; Overweight; Obesity; Cash transfers; Child obesity; Medicine; Demography; Cash; Childhood obesity; Gerontology; Economics; Sociology; Finance; Endocrinology","score_opus":0.01709956414827965,"score_gpt":0.301641606571993,"score_spread":0.2845420424237134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914873285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99557805,0.0006200465,0.00004713112,0.0012754796,0.000031831565,0.00000212474,0.000073881696,0.000002040902,0.0023693843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992601,0.0002157856,0.000014992524,0.000036146714,0.000013524157,0.0000017654351,0.00002045843,4.7641407e-7,0.00043654998],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994418,0.00022343568,0.000020877334,0.000030546897,0.000056044133,0.00022731819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974763,0.0008397824,0.00080325035,0.00014368314,0.00009614935,0.00064078264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008585336,0.00015207,0.00015369878,0.0005305353,0.00072615076,0.00070607447,0.00026237036,0.0006168963,0.008292453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007072982,0.00015097614,0.0002697213,0.0005860589,0.0005830564,0.00052144314,0.00089957414,0.0012425539,0.00017618331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042708998,0.0004768013,0.97487193,0.000024096882,0.00008303635,0.00036520336,0.0009723671,0.00024266395,0.00009609245,0.004079799,0.0008076327,0.01755335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031632262,0.00022314957,0.9894332,0.00009090689,0.00008741631,0.00034593447,0.0048630913,0.00050326734,0.00010504843,0.0029292332,0.0013745679,0.000012480028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010594599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011627008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010594599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052147644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072780106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027741075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915518988","doi":"10.32920/27616584","title":"Equality Delayed is Equality Denied for Indigenous Women","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Gender equality; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.054281854722878685,"score_gpt":0.34517034692935206,"score_spread":0.2908884922064734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915518988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23179856,0.0041031716,0.00066367845,0.112682946,0.001215503,0.000024738765,0.00012291818,0.000017833676,0.6493707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93341,0.0013001479,0.00012326769,0.0057989964,0.00023227707,0.00001586493,0.000024065746,0.000013612574,0.059081826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951565,0.0013234869,0.0000821515,0.00041098616,0.0007274754,0.0022994312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714077,0.0008212285,0.00033809963,0.0002942777,0.00040138458,0.0010042682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002985882,0.00010080307,0.00030714073,0.00046218705,0.01067167,0.0054283515,0.00086662895,0.0023616068,0.01797013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009093304,0.00016671572,0.00023964254,0.00073326955,0.015532015,0.004796753,0.0062682983,0.0028212133,0.0010452818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010504849,0.00006366259,0.010154193,0.00014382383,0.00001595002,0.0005778111,0.124633305,0.00007847865,0.00042025573,0.7791192,0.028196134,0.05649224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030261646,0.00007470241,0.029749716,0.00065434456,0.00003403071,0.00025603484,0.2585292,0.00014664012,0.0005334944,0.10319001,0.6067545,0.00004698038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1085879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14505476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1085879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005772294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01082797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918966047","doi":"","title":"The Effect of Housing Price Changes on Fertility: Evidence from Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Renting; Economics; Real estate; Demographic economics; Rental housing; Substitution effect; Labour economics; Population; Demography; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.04291053870237019,"score_gpt":0.33053935101227594,"score_spread":0.2876288123099058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918966047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92967486,0.022077788,0.0005201415,0.0041956184,0.00008916326,0.00010907814,0.02529333,0.00003724592,0.018002622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97849005,0.011660217,0.0004955462,0.0005582069,0.000027890015,0.00002541375,0.0063024256,0.000024568553,0.0024157616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709344,0.0004056094,0.00020062698,0.0004318674,0.0012900976,0.00057824043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98293513,0.0033758471,0.0028178096,0.000823262,0.008372462,0.001675439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025884127,0.000341317,0.0008031941,0.0027855544,0.0025254523,0.0014137924,0.0020880825,0.00058062054,0.004317323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010029348,0.0004443177,0.0011412879,0.01008513,0.0019078292,0.00039354668,0.0011827382,0.0008791185,0.0002958386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031062463,0.00005771879,0.9684497,0.00037726932,0.0005087754,0.00021088286,0.0016500234,0.0003917092,0.0001370521,0.0009576365,0.0054004216,0.02154818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018102286,0.000022294094,0.99576855,0.0001160108,0.00012157805,0.00003733697,0.00069553795,0.00017268737,0.000057701647,0.000055002827,0.002918707,0.000016567357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99874854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030614091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030614091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04005359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22212183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919154417","doi":"10.3368/jhr.59.1.0419-10155r3","title":"Socialized Healthcare and Women’s Fertility Decisions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Human Resources","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Schools of economic thought; Health care; Sociology; Management; Library science; Public relations; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04887883157837994,"score_gpt":0.34041707834276785,"score_spread":0.2915382467643879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919154417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752973,0.0020421096,0.000074535834,0.011115106,0.00003571973,0.000007663679,0.00026091494,0.0000016824803,0.0111649735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99779344,0.00049452536,0.000022372005,0.00028679045,0.0000120857,0.0000025660336,0.00005681173,8.554533e-7,0.0013305597],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994135,0.0003493252,0.000018095474,0.00003633594,0.0000789641,0.00010380873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962071,0.0018155552,0.0009111094,0.0000915483,0.00022854588,0.0007462288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015051134,0.00006751153,0.00015623482,0.00034372802,0.00055525365,0.0010467023,0.00019435339,0.00061773474,0.005530227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078086294,0.000119434015,0.00021421777,0.0003993088,0.0005207262,0.00040600685,0.00054492155,0.00068772206,0.00032543272],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002604334,0.00020954586,0.95423114,0.000022671284,0.00011764607,0.00018882299,0.0038725568,0.0007033754,0.000102894955,0.0086603565,0.0058335587,0.025797011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030436448,0.00012902256,0.97169536,0.00009441463,0.000033307075,0.00016814849,0.011517661,0.0013954411,0.00010446483,0.005280323,0.009524103,0.000027348913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03246488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0508551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03246488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014458266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008708506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06455183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919810910","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1314","title":"The Disability Tax Credit: Exploring Attitudes, Perceptions, and Beliefs About Disability","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Medical model of disability; Perception; Disability benefits; Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Inclusion (mineral); Psychology; Public economics; Social psychology; Political science; Actuarial science; Economics; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.05433885309137197,"score_gpt":0.3558586436122912,"score_spread":0.3015197905209192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919810910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99110353,0.0001890397,0.00013683696,0.0019539113,0.000018083138,0.000012762011,0.000019115652,9.741375e-7,0.006565729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858105,0.0002698401,0.00006065236,0.00037259943,0.0000112774005,0.000015070177,0.000013709572,0.0000010506046,0.00067474024],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996472,0.0019128355,0.000103722065,0.00013116075,0.0007547593,0.00062553515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906843,0.0048515317,0.0020957207,0.00022339592,0.00093053596,0.00121461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064994213,0.00020439326,0.0002499774,0.0015528937,0.0038089587,0.0038063957,0.00047531645,0.000935914,0.0028871805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014015813,0.00016851549,0.00027462823,0.00096002076,0.005136667,0.003166245,0.0028661299,0.0026968084,0.00022120771],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051130566,0.0005267417,0.38909805,0.000061361825,0.000027236574,0.00021905039,0.5591334,0.00012670878,0.0003436437,0.011496525,0.0021315399,0.03678462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054449815,0.000112369875,0.1117326,0.00014818953,0.000010221841,0.00014129991,0.87737894,0.00020356872,0.00011148542,0.0018920483,0.008243198,0.000020555772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021724837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02603461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9968309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031691242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003034814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043196797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922100300","doi":"10.25071/1705-1436.119","title":"Affirmative Action Positions for Women on the Canadian Labour Congress Executive: Comments to the Advancing the Equity Agenda Conference","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Just Labour","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Equity (law); Political science; Gender equity; Action (physics); Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0655114031668174,"score_gpt":0.3583675265000882,"score_spread":0.29285612333327077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922100300","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024341284,0.0025843005,0.00006798952,0.9661234,0.009984211,0.00006637022,0.00011540331,0.00001595724,0.018608235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028059237,0.0022619502,0.00026223544,0.90228695,0.0052856323,0.00014965214,0.00008805686,0.00005963285,0.061546665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96563554,0.0033718743,0.00094999844,0.0020377897,0.0117709,0.016233947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94827557,0.019739637,0.0012232575,0.00084195053,0.013612591,0.016307045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033278305,0.0015756335,0.0023205325,0.00264158,0.06468288,0.0257108,0.009516578,0.107849754,0.02171423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05645756,0.0017260982,0.0021952165,0.0040941313,0.017328987,0.00861273,0.009656992,0.066839725,0.0023520992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005598183,0.000048895832,0.0006099365,0.000098928795,0.00001857121,0.00021927788,0.0064142,0.000086525615,0.00018639248,0.0217079,0.96621,0.004343344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013000524,0.000027866387,0.0048988913,0.000510012,0.00007074918,0.00004211738,0.022209112,0.000117697404,0.00023461544,0.003965452,0.9675822,0.00021124221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9488327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9841615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12178889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12178889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3334263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88364434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2924755370","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1345","title":"Issue 2: Tax, Race, and Child Poverty: The Case for Improving the Canada Child Benefit Program","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Racialization; Child poverty; Race (biology); Indigenous; Welfare; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.009685618873354646,"score_gpt":0.2782486917139486,"score_spread":0.268563072840594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2924755370","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032754533,0.010664249,0.00036599982,0.8946596,0.0018711386,0.00011431449,0.00047514096,0.000036848993,0.05905823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5771146,0.017162137,0.0031304331,0.32992527,0.0019028258,0.00020483033,0.0003660149,0.0001442546,0.07004969],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992046,0.001049756,0.00013924758,0.00030940693,0.0028945885,0.0035610686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97826695,0.0043668947,0.0009770467,0.0004939872,0.006171211,0.009723878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066409116,0.00030193676,0.00071518985,0.0014959133,0.01956791,0.011111906,0.0038183047,0.009260919,0.0113402875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024508707,0.00036159452,0.00090538705,0.0022363618,0.0076720617,0.0035934213,0.0038164717,0.008012767,0.0004097172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001232127,0.00028546443,0.07720878,0.00039427725,0.00008381655,0.00074557593,0.008515446,0.00091744715,0.00035277018,0.24023938,0.56406754,0.10706629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008531581,0.000072110815,0.11326715,0.0020655585,0.00020621957,0.00039941838,0.022380602,0.0013303526,0.00052761403,0.016970571,0.842529,0.00016607132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98532224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99307585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102710366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.102710366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3710609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74521935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2934111509","doi":"10.3138/9781442678163-012","title":"6. Getting Good Child Care for Families: What Can Canada Learn from Other Countries?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Child care; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.01275121739779153,"score_gpt":0.2030449840721353,"score_spread":0.19029376667434378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2934111509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006103145,0.11010442,0.000381342,0.35368863,0.0048889294,0.000074987634,0.0007233619,0.00008351462,0.5239517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08719992,0.14513429,0.0025892563,0.08143339,0.00082520576,0.00013494579,0.0005253612,0.00018842073,0.6819691],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998536,0.0001757159,0.000027281687,0.00006055363,0.00046268755,0.0007377716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778926,0.00019121471,0.000054986864,0.000037811606,0.0008463294,0.0010804203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015099986,0.00057376205,0.0004356154,0.0010278593,0.011465959,0.006993357,0.0011236961,0.0046037626,0.029131679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023508987,0.00030799667,0.00042753402,0.0028436817,0.0037134981,0.0030498595,0.0019804141,0.004571468,0.0026876556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012073536,0.000041273714,0.0021745581,0.00030065764,0.0000075378216,0.00027743191,0.010676,0.0001303063,0.00009598403,0.08008967,0.8096894,0.096505105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054707098,0.0000075675493,0.0061478144,0.00079641305,0.000009039094,0.00006259171,0.0110424105,0.000034039705,0.000049062633,0.0032333403,0.97859555,0.00001660547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9771845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99555475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054785404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054785404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16585381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39749777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936090486","doi":"10.1017/dem.2019.1","title":"Female labor force participation and fertility differentials","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Demographic Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Girl; Economics; Total fertility rate; Demographic economics; Distribution (mathematics); Labour economics; Demography; Population; Family planning; Psychology; Sociology; Research methodology; Mathematics; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.02070578570936673,"score_gpt":0.27413552365583405,"score_spread":0.25342973794646734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936090486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963331,0.000085086474,0.00016235995,0.00015428195,0.0000020702541,0.0000036703846,0.0002934245,0.0000032916714,0.0029627897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993363,0.000031695068,0.000020521858,0.000008077784,0.000003262363,0.0000020699358,0.00008894265,4.4458835e-7,0.0005086611],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997286,0.00008978941,0.00001181392,0.000043926615,0.000043173484,0.00008269171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973763,0.0014090881,0.0006957133,0.00014332331,0.00012232338,0.00025328307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087855,0.000088473935,0.00012736034,0.0006123497,0.00018667697,0.00039562365,0.00014616051,0.00024409314,0.008102785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051365644,0.00007204408,0.00018359016,0.00043543315,0.00037256966,0.00021732798,0.0003693642,0.00024219358,0.00036780688],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014463677,0.00007261144,0.9770585,0.000015315498,0.00003733673,0.00018871245,0.00034386202,0.0024256073,0.0005986492,0.0060572494,0.0006199627,0.01243758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013760115,0.0000802506,0.9921117,0.0000119152355,0.000009895427,0.00023264525,0.00047777468,0.0020563928,0.00028932965,0.0030248186,0.0016857509,0.0000057792713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041294163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039889407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008102785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045092363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014807576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027106464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936614317","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3344637","title":"Fertility Response to Climate Shocks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Agrarian society; Livelihood; Agriculture; Geography; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.010630132116048227,"score_gpt":0.2814981180337791,"score_spread":0.27086798591773087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936614317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939277,0.00009377197,0.0001832873,0.00050078053,0.00001913062,0.000005133159,0.0006470278,0.000013013591,0.004610187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878997,0.000037843427,0.000015762838,0.000033831588,0.000007816065,0.000002078798,0.00015890872,0.0000018379052,0.0009519019],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989796,0.000025990477,0.0000028315349,0.000016036644,0.000009784538,0.000047392863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995741,0.00013348482,0.000106933876,0.000030178833,0.000058793532,0.00009657226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003078942,0.0000662975,0.00015074323,0.00026104742,0.000288302,0.0003869062,0.00014612025,0.00037964777,0.0059442464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011660996,0.00007248187,0.00021758136,0.0002510752,0.00025848753,0.00017313243,0.0003885038,0.00034951075,0.0005102407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020268126,0.00035617276,0.8881558,0.00009454124,0.0002589878,0.0005919022,0.0017764893,0.034033593,0.024672197,0.014658071,0.0089671165,0.024408199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015247853,0.00012563654,0.987421,0.000007315246,0.000017472748,0.00007195453,0.0010515957,0.0053317724,0.0010715561,0.0016666526,0.0032068463,0.0000129943055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008855947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0093011595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008855947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044197592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028289232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01988548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938115164","doi":"","title":"Examining Gender Responsive Implementation of National Climate Change Policies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UWSpace (University of Waterloo)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Political science; Environmental planning; Geography; Oceanography; Geology","score_opus":0.05299918448215348,"score_gpt":0.29943794965264914,"score_spread":0.24643876517049565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938115164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7548803,0.0052335644,0.012552669,0.032510396,0.0005249703,0.0005988066,0.00028985046,0.000037360227,0.19337204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880903,0.0023253737,0.004535314,0.0015824593,0.0000265952,0.00029314862,0.000062351995,0.000019270285,0.0030651714],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97302747,0.019614795,0.0007659133,0.0008324724,0.0035261288,0.0022333052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967397,0.022382973,0.0037120713,0.0010529779,0.0044666007,0.0009883797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03880198,0.00029669475,0.00038916178,0.0025326286,0.0063767205,0.0061222007,0.0012673234,0.0012914538,0.0021924544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035433996,0.0002828667,0.00042870714,0.0037323143,0.008320585,0.004455455,0.005118564,0.0023669468,0.00015491381],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049974646,0.00009215347,0.02221141,0.0012901408,0.00005112221,0.0008801458,0.70217276,0.0010158792,0.0021343818,0.19621022,0.002792272,0.07109958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054444563,0.0000858331,0.024058867,0.0015717816,0.000028094073,0.00012017977,0.85101664,0.0003763474,0.001833396,0.01039926,0.110472046,0.000032099677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021186186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031819347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03880198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019327486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026238887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20520693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939836523","doi":"10.7202/1058539ar","title":"Progrès et stagnation","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du Nouvel-Ontario","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University; Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic stagnation; Economics; Keynesian economics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.030820620459083233,"score_gpt":0.2725143892425394,"score_spread":0.24169376878345616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939836523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022320297,0.012074934,0.0036710838,0.09768591,0.0014138693,0.00006044755,0.0004736167,0.00017098465,0.86212885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50094986,0.009106935,0.0016382762,0.012058003,0.000779245,0.000179794,0.00049124064,0.00024191252,0.4745547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748945,0.00078356836,0.00008076427,0.0003215939,0.0005400641,0.0007845277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983394,0.0003868254,0.00021796876,0.00017873861,0.0005815594,0.00029551025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002925616,0.00054616586,0.00048281407,0.0021227964,0.006775393,0.007385375,0.0012438833,0.0022477724,0.032637894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068578455,0.00022606291,0.0004611612,0.0030876438,0.007955117,0.006723674,0.0054998426,0.0029392387,0.004243944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001013906,0.000008678951,0.0007209094,0.000048438287,0.000003928359,0.0001281186,0.004943385,0.00012037212,0.000036249206,0.94851965,0.030408174,0.015051956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007923865,0.000014249431,0.0009684286,0.00016748648,0.000005990684,0.00008129017,0.0036646011,0.000096625095,0.00008149051,0.070535645,0.92436725,0.00000901908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0671615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065272905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0671615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016446888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013287792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13354117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942525780","doi":"10.1007/s13524-019-00782-6","title":"Advanced School Progression Relative to Age and Early Family Formation in Mexico","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Maryland Population Research Center, University of Maryland; York University","keywords":"Educational attainment; National Survey of Family Growth; Demography; Pregnancy; Medicine; Young adult; Cohort; Birth order; Sexual intercourse; Fertility; Teenage pregnancy; Gerontology; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Population; Family planning; Environmental health; Political science","score_opus":0.011206350450567835,"score_gpt":0.27999509319028587,"score_spread":0.26878874273971803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942525780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981363,0.00034859873,0.000023117356,0.00016173699,0.000002966107,0.000002766008,0.00014316631,0.0000015678986,0.0011798607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989574,0.0004827291,0.000043275497,0.000013703926,0.000005064064,0.000002585048,0.00012639738,7.758495e-7,0.0003680114],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998901,0.000021366135,0.000004431603,0.000022323075,0.000010510136,0.000051292194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995828,0.000060005194,0.00023474125,0.000016927484,0.000026483953,0.00007900897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002941391,0.000084939245,0.00013089742,0.0006434679,0.0007214817,0.00048995635,0.00017012299,0.00013674032,0.0018742016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009089343,0.00007718084,0.0001488842,0.00057365245,0.00022390982,0.0002772004,0.0005107694,0.00028810446,0.000059982463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007267056,0.000062859704,0.989358,0.000017764787,0.000015940266,0.0001827436,0.0021211165,0.00008621328,0.00016536044,0.00060309964,0.0002950743,0.007019212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000190028,0.000024208868,0.99766374,0.000015922142,0.0000071990603,0.000038057107,0.0012225012,0.000046756606,0.000030205352,0.000056714274,0.0008915471,0.0000013361815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07650253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10483229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07650253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064819003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046756395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15211445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944250461","doi":"10.1111/cars.12242","title":"Social Change and the Gendered Division of Household Labor in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Division (mathematics); Sociology; Labour economics; Social change; Demographic economics; Gender studies; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.07731765735171922,"score_gpt":0.2715236043247636,"score_spread":0.19420594697304436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944250461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8142686,0.08001064,0.0006009444,0.025645852,0.0005977524,0.00013445863,0.0034312091,0.000050782663,0.07525985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722383,0.016482495,0.0003068395,0.00074485486,0.000039220467,0.00002804669,0.00047657322,0.000015368818,0.009668416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772495,0.00020073491,0.00005778288,0.00024576456,0.00071939843,0.0010512765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977456,0.00023590687,0.00023687471,0.000064390784,0.0009888047,0.0007284519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001828157,0.00033161358,0.00057640433,0.0038605602,0.013328622,0.004411357,0.0016020112,0.0007960325,0.004166256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003803356,0.0002534573,0.00044787308,0.010404558,0.005550951,0.0011554952,0.0023001968,0.0011302916,0.00018800382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031009916,0.00016093127,0.3814662,0.0011317737,0.00016751672,0.0013771759,0.14795712,0.0012883749,0.00079074607,0.087705776,0.046179388,0.33146498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017481914,0.000040594372,0.7859533,0.00069481775,0.00004958013,0.0001681066,0.07349464,0.0007423326,0.00020155315,0.003870776,0.13467576,0.000091131646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99903935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99942076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19653544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19653544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1897822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93190503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944654769","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12198","title":"Halifax Henna: The Art of Manageable Growth*","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Perspectives","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Government (linguistics); Passion; Face (sociological concept); Work (physics); Work–life balance; Business; Management; Public relations; Marketing; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.010935678217872447,"score_gpt":0.25718775094368157,"score_spread":0.24625207272580912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944654769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074613415,0.0048719733,0.003537714,0.070876375,0.0009886556,0.00004880732,0.000059070102,0.00010380767,0.84490013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8857069,0.0013274513,0.0015272642,0.0023285924,0.00010656493,0.000048044123,0.000013197085,0.000049994585,0.108892016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896693,0.00042150446,0.000015820458,0.00012838269,0.00021471533,0.00025263822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994223,0.00018351096,0.000063454354,0.00005242671,0.00008843924,0.00018988719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012656153,0.00045527465,0.00017340272,0.00044842673,0.011706937,0.0046624443,0.00077372725,0.001365924,0.009788557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017122461,0.00011611516,0.00013386986,0.00033217395,0.015202572,0.0026263113,0.0043468475,0.002380889,0.0009418449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052489122,0.000030473255,0.0014274706,0.000075664604,0.000004624612,0.0046534264,0.12801825,0.00041083596,0.00070921774,0.7395578,0.07224631,0.052813437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061686187,0.000019953168,0.0011267597,0.00026354555,0.0000027107997,0.0017630103,0.10702513,0.00041543896,0.00047566716,0.042190075,0.8466898,0.000021763211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0503541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07132049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0503541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008881424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004714902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100121975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944843947","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2018-047","title":"Paid Parental Leave: Leaner Might Be Better","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Parental leave; Investment (military); Survey data collection; Psychology; Cognition; Plan (archaeology); Time-use survey; Demographic economics; Developmental psychology; Business; Economics; Geography; Political science; Engineering; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.021365737259022813,"score_gpt":0.2665621603166178,"score_spread":0.24519642305759498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944843947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8948766,0.0032673292,0.00085640606,0.05574115,0.000755509,0.00015693008,0.0010558006,0.000076392025,0.043213975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98497343,0.0006028562,0.00029844628,0.0052315006,0.00009503684,0.000024023464,0.00019104658,0.000014770631,0.0085689435],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806076,0.00041636615,0.000033535835,0.00014307238,0.0003416811,0.0010045219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730456,0.00034114017,0.00044706606,0.00014735604,0.00034038737,0.0014194797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026828388,0.00027495436,0.00046312687,0.00048449286,0.0037631409,0.001958695,0.0007001757,0.0011706565,0.016467256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007131402,0.00011839421,0.00042133746,0.00057907414,0.0017352642,0.0012691155,0.00091034785,0.0018731199,0.00061341724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035290353,0.0034552505,0.362721,0.0003565076,0.000369101,0.0010866695,0.024902515,0.0024372775,0.0033174832,0.087496094,0.058443807,0.45188525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011087786,0.0021878467,0.68080074,0.0011546,0.0002387878,0.00031427495,0.060316965,0.0015455044,0.0012009611,0.020063864,0.23091389,0.00015380123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5139849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66685957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48601508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007572194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012016014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97775465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946240308","doi":"10.1093/sf/soz053","title":"The Fiscalization of Social Policy: How Taxpayers Trumped Children in the Fight Against Child Poverty","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Forces","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Poverty; Tax policy; Social policy; Public economics; Child poverty; Economics; Working poor; Revenue; Tax credit; Political science; Development economics; Tax reform; Economic growth; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.00863750615023289,"score_gpt":0.258554647439891,"score_spread":0.24991714128965808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946240308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4244073,0.01673273,0.0012448668,0.18112956,0.0010811454,0.00003482898,0.00013589168,0.000028429837,0.3752053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739666,0.004980788,0.00031412207,0.0049449503,0.0002179985,0.000024584804,0.000027013744,0.000021480908,0.0155025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971625,0.001623238,0.000032130934,0.0000949539,0.00023144732,0.00085578166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986357,0.0006905235,0.00022595674,0.000046465582,0.00013643429,0.00026493036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028036518,0.00025016718,0.00024661582,0.0014597804,0.010344176,0.008175423,0.0007432877,0.0018847451,0.0034136693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005659943,0.00016603545,0.00024426077,0.002051531,0.016600516,0.0055036545,0.004469816,0.003532546,0.0001563451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045101257,0.000031919175,0.0042031636,0.00005597226,0.00000905514,0.00020480441,0.0929509,0.00026971867,0.00011168385,0.8693612,0.016687905,0.016068589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029483319,0.000070693495,0.018281192,0.000653759,0.000020887195,0.0002757803,0.31171066,0.00037859989,0.0003765221,0.15231808,0.5158462,0.000038253424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06578507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10332322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06578507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022045348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010106402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15995091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949523545","doi":"10.24908/iqurcp.11726","title":"11. The Gender Wage Gap of Recent University Graduates","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Proxy (statistics); Demographic economics; Position (finance); Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Glass ceiling; Labour economics; Hourly wage; Psychology; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.1992752149906952,"score_gpt":0.38772177498195104,"score_spread":0.18844655999125584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949523545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965669,0.00032052796,0.00007084584,0.00045680592,0.00002068467,0.0000030979918,0.00012510348,0.0000021303033,0.002433983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998464,0.00007987954,0.00003527909,0.00009418224,0.000019063324,0.000004864989,0.000080575475,0.0000011646136,0.0012211084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947256,0.00012205658,0.0000325265,0.00007782815,0.00014880553,0.00014625351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996095,0.0012114162,0.0013800192,0.00014311832,0.00026557763,0.00090478023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015954215,0.0000928215,0.00029968005,0.0006493123,0.00049538247,0.0009822124,0.0003243901,0.0004701644,0.0070419493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064082793,0.000086487526,0.0002356583,0.0006104445,0.00043050293,0.0006125707,0.00065911224,0.00053162896,0.0009955775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010875406,0.00015998591,0.97966033,0.000026475896,0.000021130176,0.0001251989,0.0028939748,0.000062544525,0.00033933486,0.0015849214,0.0007596048,0.014257805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035611313,0.00009843919,0.9955799,0.000012079526,0.0000037583534,0.0000832172,0.0025588702,0.00010752583,0.000061034676,0.00036902993,0.001118656,0.000003822366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040058466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006663557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070419493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037831892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040565268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023557723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951482278","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2872262","title":"Fertility Transitions Along the Extensive and Intensive Margins","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Environmental science; Geography; Demography; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.015737417239271797,"score_gpt":0.26978924457924447,"score_spread":0.25405182733997267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951482278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884821,0.00026059925,0.00032646902,0.0008977689,0.000009016402,0.000011236825,0.00021111015,0.000006604554,0.009795075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791914,0.00007325103,0.0000406596,0.00004255449,0.000007298539,0.000004897891,0.000045872384,0.0000020078949,0.0018643572],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996574,0.000083909785,0.00000898174,0.00005093416,0.00003368967,0.00016512806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868506,0.0004994007,0.00024877788,0.000070365306,0.00012592405,0.0003704225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088589307,0.00007147863,0.00019524399,0.0005404297,0.0011519447,0.001223084,0.000340491,0.000540114,0.010119554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041640587,0.00012898682,0.00017635661,0.0004394586,0.0015773725,0.0013298145,0.0018856075,0.00073638326,0.0005440942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032136557,0.0006155514,0.57792604,0.00015428563,0.00009079348,0.0009144649,0.04366118,0.0065963585,0.0068936874,0.26139462,0.006958411,0.091580994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045205987,0.00028182857,0.91612405,0.000076314165,0.000017096807,0.00012824575,0.033355564,0.0012764499,0.0010166183,0.032068744,0.015573275,0.00003653418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008392203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015697364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010119554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010347265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091273844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033853292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952776858","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2924703","title":"Immigration and the Rate of Population Mixing: Explorations with a Stylized Model","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Mixing (physics); Immigration; Population; Econometrics; Economics; Demography; Macroeconomics; Political science; Physics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.013413062484071299,"score_gpt":0.2535731243631788,"score_spread":0.24016006187910752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952776858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6672428,0.0025223622,0.24168152,0.0113496175,0.00022372787,0.00016188945,0.00071564247,0.000349153,0.07575329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865045,0.0010708786,0.004957381,0.00023004142,0.00011664716,0.00005691085,0.000078056626,0.00004829307,0.0069372063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906224,0.00051731325,0.000026991387,0.00015549663,0.000057055495,0.00018092988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856098,0.011936966,0.0010186584,0.0007586765,0.00024879852,0.00042696358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047700517,0.0005739778,0.0016198817,0.0010409227,0.0015513336,0.0050226343,0.0022956915,0.0035658062,0.011244667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02327181,0.00061538094,0.0013692713,0.0012118967,0.0032739595,0.006333572,0.0021982715,0.0027162174,0.0009127129],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009548809,0.00007253343,0.0060597025,0.00007016491,0.000052845902,0.00031745527,0.0009893824,0.113863386,0.00043542526,0.87031347,0.002353138,0.0053769816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009719471,0.00005441875,0.0026884968,0.000049966606,0.00006503681,0.00027990303,0.0008078153,0.4555864,0.000117474454,0.53816986,0.00202953,0.000053892065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009457766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057586217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011244667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021952686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011361988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037617147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954859800","doi":"10.5089/9781451863529.001.a001","title":"Why Are Women Working So Much More in Canada? An International Perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IMF Working Paper","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Population ageing; Population; Perspective (graphical); Economic growth; Economic policy; Demographic economics; Business","score_opus":0.01659397469567251,"score_gpt":0.2672378702892402,"score_spread":0.25064389559356764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954859800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43600893,0.048434917,0.00044691778,0.28164124,0.0014693529,0.000056674504,0.003268464,0.000077291006,0.22859617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9472697,0.023803268,0.0002525787,0.010916688,0.00022653663,0.00001626843,0.00056951196,0.000035469795,0.016910072],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976545,0.000142076,0.0000351478,0.0001858053,0.0005067792,0.0014757008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975157,0.0001730331,0.00021665142,0.000040920386,0.0011016757,0.00095202524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011645939,0.00043811553,0.00051849,0.0026256796,0.009406194,0.004573899,0.0010587686,0.0011440384,0.012038735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026459002,0.00014543274,0.00042075026,0.0072290637,0.0030954415,0.0014858659,0.001236452,0.0017775139,0.00049926084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031658664,0.00012759805,0.48136163,0.0007232818,0.00019707214,0.0026856218,0.06750675,0.000651892,0.0013341621,0.07301843,0.16788813,0.20418882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022475739,0.00006209219,0.54163,0.0012368055,0.00013180039,0.00057124544,0.21416238,0.00025979683,0.00045011495,0.0027530186,0.23857324,0.00014695447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99637884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044038482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044038482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06478271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31952304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956002133","doi":"10.1056/nejm-jw.na49422","title":"The Child Is Parent to the Adult Wage-Earner","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal watch","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Wage; Labour economics; Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.013294772027559331,"score_gpt":0.2796027146476844,"score_spread":0.266307942620125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956002133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.740731,0.0046029645,0.0029473258,0.017904222,0.0010356824,0.00012646339,0.016919509,0.00020786219,0.21552497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8994967,0.0052630035,0.0023068981,0.0026166958,0.00017523029,0.00011020378,0.003201348,0.000045076828,0.08678499],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996754,0.00008151916,0.000017897619,0.000042204836,0.000088658424,0.00009431333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904674,0.00016817714,0.00024361821,0.00010101754,0.00023415312,0.00020619057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041401607,0.00011204322,0.00024517492,0.00043389676,0.0016821522,0.00076255616,0.00030544354,0.00030480474,0.019163288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027041142,0.00011417203,0.00014061468,0.0008768648,0.0003586896,0.0008946566,0.00040794976,0.0006750466,0.0034615495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021820296,0.00025094033,0.61044496,0.00026919632,0.00006572148,0.0025183544,0.017917247,0.000081268736,0.001265078,0.019889554,0.1553191,0.1917604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015945943,0.00023440193,0.62111586,0.00055488996,0.000049817605,0.00429229,0.04231733,0.00008832205,0.0012020421,0.0026187385,0.3274775,0.000032889733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049109973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10525227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049109973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059557956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013334685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0976482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2959832078","doi":"10.1002/cl2.151","title":"PROTOCOL: Vocational and business training to increase women's participation in higher skilled occupations in low‐ and middle‐income countries: protocol for a systematic review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Protocol (science); Vocational education; Low and middle income countries; Training (meteorology); Business; Psychology; Economics; Economic growth; Developing country; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.14681856477987792,"score_gpt":0.43014155276041544,"score_spread":0.2833229879805375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2959832078","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00086516526,0.0031229544,0.0010866371,0.001007433,0.0011330635,0.9657824,0.025105542,0.00040750662,0.0014894045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008737514,0.00081436295,0.0011083133,0.0004914369,0.000070326474,0.99473107,0.0007920875,0.000040332056,0.0010782972],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.98464495,0.0050568543,0.0046755886,0.0020301659,0.002287518,0.001304922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96868235,0.009624129,0.0068231854,0.0029499445,0.010532806,0.0013875937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028299771,0.005743157,0.020757396,0.009222658,0.0036443847,0.009449487,0.0035256208,0.006857982,0.20516811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06005227,0.0053973566,0.013715996,0.007825301,0.0036176594,0.009739006,0.0045491317,0.0058562923,0.022681544],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012682208,0.00024682735,0.00042848638,0.8748617,0.0031732833,0.00018249216,0.0009253629,0.0005117924,0.0013149938,0.0030121764,0.07859388,0.024066778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.13922337,0.0020825453,0.005824093,0.64462996,0.008088932,0.00028663647,0.001927494,0.0012886808,0.0022120008,0.012097362,0.18172278,0.00061622186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009948778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01479075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20516811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01249627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0243229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6863557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962471682","doi":"10.1920/wp.ifs.2019.1919","title":"OLS estimation of the intra-household distribution of consumption","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Estimation; Consumption (sociology); Econometrics; Distribution (mathematics); Statistics; Economics; Environmental science; Mathematics; Art; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.04332288169332451,"score_gpt":0.29847943211887074,"score_spread":0.25515655042554625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962471682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8072513,0.0003738996,0.17241295,0.0009449416,0.000034682373,0.000097592376,0.0075773103,0.00034476366,0.0109626595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97534615,0.00032841263,0.011320877,0.00006783488,0.000019266274,0.0000801565,0.002836718,0.000023515116,0.009977051],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996271,0.00018550472,0.000015353813,0.000060404138,0.00005273142,0.000058830978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903154,0.00054761436,0.00018190738,0.00013871578,0.000073351854,0.000026939539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000829622,0.00024899145,0.00054945116,0.00067776855,0.0001911475,0.0007577427,0.00054087414,0.00036182918,0.004182973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038443475,0.00024252354,0.00039433065,0.0013045482,0.00031428452,0.0004743817,0.0005375596,0.0005658978,0.0007869105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020931785,0.00020714672,0.57562697,0.0001898159,0.0008057053,0.0004989283,0.0012596495,0.1690925,0.00169053,0.11611689,0.015213653,0.119088955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041263604,0.00011031588,0.3464122,0.000099875135,0.000192219,0.00023248974,0.0018774441,0.5386437,0.0027023372,0.090988174,0.018642066,0.000057903762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019436754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018021857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019436754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040970804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004646777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038647234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964248859","doi":"10.1017/9781108227407","title":"Tax Credits for the Working Poor: A Call for Reform","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Earnings; Internal revenue; Tax credit; Audit; Revenue; Welfare reform; Work (physics); Welfare; Business; Public economics; Labour economics; Economics; Accounting; Engineering; Economy; Market economy","score_opus":0.0467376458974897,"score_gpt":0.29542957563163186,"score_spread":0.24869192973414217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964248859","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023049356,0.031669214,0.0005051169,0.88795775,0.010333868,0.00004098025,0.00011896006,0.000083809486,0.06698531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.096752934,0.13810723,0.0054437164,0.35607496,0.018832745,0.00031513968,0.0004753809,0.00019629819,0.38380167],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980252,0.00060889556,0.00007212538,0.00009899505,0.000744057,0.0004507738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99573296,0.0017479247,0.00022384874,0.0003077433,0.0010515024,0.0009360951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043455395,0.0003757159,0.0007074108,0.0012464866,0.004456259,0.008988312,0.0011501592,0.0069275973,0.015686264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012634939,0.00031735294,0.0004420242,0.0019944971,0.0054613096,0.012120889,0.0031486542,0.011642916,0.002725662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001046369,0.000052310566,0.00034249213,0.0000832163,0.0000022391307,0.000048359627,0.0009009802,0.00014415834,0.000034027224,0.19405028,0.74798363,0.056347918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011784882,0.000015601478,0.00057591003,0.00040487212,0.000002558847,0.000040894258,0.0017956678,0.00008473802,0.000020629945,0.027547173,0.96949023,0.000009981165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037269246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051044405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037269246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068541504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021936802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07410461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965094030","doi":"10.1080/00036846.2019.1646873","title":"German income taxation and the timing of marriage","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; German; Quarter (Canadian coin); Gross income; Labour economics; Income tax; Demographic economics; Panel data; International taxation; State income tax; Public economics; Tax reform; Econometrics","score_opus":0.010965554880747208,"score_gpt":0.2376689422283134,"score_spread":0.22670338734756618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965094030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809668,0.001189643,0.0010362727,0.0005481054,0.000029130526,0.000019270783,0.0016020677,0.000018516806,0.014590241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996736,0.0004283123,0.000121175835,0.000027193477,0.0000063805046,0.000004894259,0.00046692617,0.0000029291136,0.0022061765],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961567,0.00009552379,0.000023938981,0.0000616628,0.00007715506,0.00012610391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997203,0.0007316759,0.0016052022,0.00014093533,0.00011592315,0.00020337389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067472405,0.000164734,0.00020261202,0.00091576076,0.00043446274,0.0009669067,0.00024818844,0.0003336399,0.0071820244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004303313,0.000121718054,0.00021960803,0.0011460307,0.0004039728,0.0004901308,0.00051757897,0.00036904865,0.0007030355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006404736,0.0002529688,0.84552735,0.00010352968,0.00012674638,0.0007904755,0.0011149187,0.014068506,0.0013308824,0.07456851,0.0057823276,0.055693306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050139308,0.00018617576,0.95975477,0.00008941085,0.00006942305,0.00031601134,0.0014284885,0.008197993,0.0011105537,0.014537063,0.014223978,0.000035818153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012839126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013723081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012839126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011974233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045023466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025528789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965302798","doi":"","title":"Reproductive Health Policies in Peru: Social Reforms and Citizenship Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Reproductive rights; Social citizenship; Social policy; Social rights; Political science; Reproductive health; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Public administration; Gender studies; Human rights; Law; Politics; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.22676045925650606,"score_gpt":0.550640081895743,"score_spread":0.3238796226392369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965302798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49011412,0.005696288,0.0024199502,0.108010426,0.00008987382,0.00008112759,0.000102083286,0.00004929411,0.39343682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916898,0.0011523686,0.00023492966,0.0013556879,0.00007266387,0.00003345658,0.000023649724,0.000005461074,0.005431943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735934,0.00144255,0.00003209305,0.00012901469,0.00015875346,0.0008782886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982816,0.000838715,0.00035409737,0.00011122103,0.00013859579,0.00027580865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029621825,0.00018265392,0.0002174594,0.0008971487,0.0057457937,0.0043872306,0.0005962668,0.002123929,0.0060241865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045870394,0.00015630396,0.00025214418,0.0011552871,0.010341808,0.002302899,0.006029329,0.0017295536,0.00017452652],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002515179,0.000061223305,0.007452508,0.00008320599,0.00001542862,0.00072939455,0.03983653,0.00048681334,0.00028782836,0.93215454,0.002143454,0.016723968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074828546,0.0003047,0.10045943,0.0006670618,0.000058333528,0.000662608,0.106811024,0.0018908277,0.0008645841,0.4261591,0.36198053,0.0000670212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011356064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014006452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011356064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049447636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038122495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03587687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967901995","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2019-003","title":"Policy Options for Retargeting the Canada Child Benefit","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Additionality; Incentive; Child poverty; Poverty; Discretion; Public economics; Cash; Child support; Distribution (mathematics); Poverty reduction; Transfer (computing); Business; Cash transfers; Economics; Political science; Finance; Economic growth; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01586831427191885,"score_gpt":0.2563823743413795,"score_spread":0.24051406006946066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967901995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24286923,0.0041051833,0.03283984,0.113988265,0.0008166557,0.0032648616,0.0039979666,0.00090900884,0.59720904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91905165,0.0014848916,0.023335218,0.011253455,0.000084183266,0.00063652796,0.00067978364,0.00006947594,0.043404806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943111,0.001373047,0.000080203536,0.00033866134,0.0013145655,0.002582488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719524,0.000751417,0.00012604753,0.0001497124,0.00096838525,0.00080920104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040310323,0.000590559,0.00035897337,0.0015357921,0.0045453887,0.003664464,0.0026516393,0.0030265383,0.01491121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010540891,0.00036427617,0.00089585717,0.0017241841,0.0016711736,0.0014505639,0.0021817663,0.0018637904,0.0005161478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006130075,0.0004774784,0.014632117,0.00035176775,0.00012878516,0.0007847832,0.0020453227,0.094561785,0.0038055608,0.7078752,0.08105179,0.09367239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012483596,0.00059454265,0.04966277,0.0006635564,0.00028583902,0.0003252861,0.0082792025,0.09078405,0.003110888,0.12058017,0.7240583,0.00040712953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9587001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9781114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06976267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06976267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1542433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.506166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968745706","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2019-016","title":"Expanding the Canada Workers Benefit to Design a Guaranteed Basic Income","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Subsidy; Decile; Poverty; Revenue; Economics; Work (physics); Working poor; Income Support; Tax revenue; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Public economics; Business; Finance; Economic growth","score_opus":0.024443052026652905,"score_gpt":0.26100566389227675,"score_spread":0.23656261186562386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968745706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6610916,0.0005782818,0.077009566,0.009044296,0.00020044712,0.0020688784,0.007756082,0.00085172284,0.24139917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542342,0.00015167959,0.01963664,0.00041816547,0.000014130416,0.00021227475,0.00064350443,0.000026648146,0.024662778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990269,0.00012708003,0.000009108164,0.000066581524,0.00030550716,0.000464956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938154,0.000055696673,0.000034289318,0.000039045408,0.00026259196,0.00022683459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079409376,0.00021632614,0.00021476751,0.00052608753,0.0014093322,0.0009966771,0.0012765992,0.00046269086,0.0075574378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018054438,0.00016946584,0.00036914067,0.0007424852,0.00068954716,0.0003639608,0.00082206674,0.0008404772,0.0003512214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007187897,0.0008289915,0.08638218,0.00020731479,0.00010944279,0.00042164413,0.0010968358,0.20968647,0.0052623777,0.40870994,0.07147183,0.21510419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013440088,0.00089870667,0.14048655,0.00024714458,0.00027911642,0.0003382702,0.001897295,0.37028393,0.0054083965,0.03809967,0.4405231,0.00019385987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92705107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.957598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07294893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02342924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.063432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16999179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969564122","doi":"10.1007/s11150-019-09461-2","title":"What influence do empowered women have? Land and the reality of women’s relative power in Peru","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; NorQuest College","funders":"Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers","keywords":"Empowerment; Power (physics); Economics; Women's empowerment; Renting; Demographic economics; Bargaining power; Psychological intervention; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Microeconomics; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.02030273015303596,"score_gpt":0.2615294270317667,"score_spread":0.24122669687873072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969564122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4157701,0.17341322,0.0039692773,0.15818085,0.00028885328,0.00002995039,0.00035013902,0.000024684778,0.24797297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96480155,0.030255016,0.00020920933,0.0010619675,0.00020767096,0.000018500263,0.000031912892,0.0000087015,0.0034053829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819285,0.0012417834,0.000027832206,0.00012583248,0.00018220468,0.00022956012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766076,0.0016583501,0.00031845408,0.00008849477,0.00017089534,0.00010297126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002516944,0.00021643467,0.00044188643,0.0010926031,0.0019200442,0.0053239116,0.0007803351,0.0014295378,0.0042346385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005388921,0.00020966689,0.00015703864,0.002627957,0.012798222,0.0062866663,0.003409686,0.0012587346,0.00021088205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007596857,0.000039466926,0.018183265,0.0011424039,0.000043833807,0.0008214749,0.11286088,0.00040250545,0.00060528883,0.76548135,0.004499753,0.095843755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018379156,0.00013304006,0.0669809,0.0031404523,0.000056060875,0.00078400754,0.274712,0.0005452634,0.0005478221,0.2883556,0.3646762,0.000050330826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005698524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011501951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005698524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002770046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016113428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02009821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970739156","doi":"10.1016/j.ehb.2023.101248","title":"The effect of paid parental leave on breastfeeding, parental health and behavior","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics & Human Biology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Parental leave; Breastfeeding; Duration (music); Demographic economics; Health plan; Psychology; Health insurance; Demography; Medicine; Economics; Economic growth; Sociology; Health care; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.024252473740834356,"score_gpt":0.3180962941053467,"score_spread":0.29384382036451234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970739156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977763,0.0007623046,0.00003347599,0.00050508155,0.00003114939,0.0000028122627,0.00009848547,0.0000024981362,0.00078791875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903655,0.00018571381,0.000030436417,0.000051854142,0.000022819751,0.0000033716478,0.00004716099,0.0000018777808,0.0006201319],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874926,0.00064374314,0.00004063719,0.00008682488,0.00008879856,0.00039070772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896297,0.0052356143,0.001146189,0.00040323337,0.00020548058,0.0033797333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018215065,0.00023965852,0.0004084113,0.0004007895,0.0010798351,0.00088691,0.0004893517,0.0011874875,0.005150575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008662151,0.00024171466,0.00083816116,0.00035734978,0.0006570485,0.00047539256,0.0008144924,0.0014466322,0.00023605095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044837575,0.0018337171,0.97533506,0.000028484548,0.00031173887,0.0002772922,0.00094225415,0.00025813637,0.00045479147,0.0004434446,0.0003522075,0.015279236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039943156,0.00055746455,0.99747556,0.000018281224,0.00008311756,0.00007027539,0.00096630695,0.00023894577,0.00005905857,0.0002006325,0.0002832074,0.000007170701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02126695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03288149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02126695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008786626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014132257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042286277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971589791","doi":"","title":"Parental Divorce: The Experience Among Second Generation Chinese-Canadian Women","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.012499937948200947,"score_gpt":0.273302539837,"score_spread":0.26080260188879906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971589791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976432,0.00040203764,0.000009844336,0.0003969572,0.000016379156,0.000007059396,0.00008122313,0.0000010842249,0.0014421412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727803,0.00045818265,0.000018373481,0.00016422084,0.0000064702012,0.000006321127,0.00007180862,0.0000015914507,0.0019950264],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992048,0.00011651755,0.000025093865,0.000053315307,0.00013529402,0.0004649794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824214,0.00017751516,0.00028346074,0.000041461946,0.00040749423,0.00084803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000851805,0.00030877403,0.00040086836,0.0010452509,0.012141461,0.0022551268,0.00088801386,0.0009565905,0.0032727101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029144664,0.0002921918,0.00026808612,0.0024626006,0.0019990678,0.0011300918,0.002128275,0.001504041,0.00021346826],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004006029,0.00019347972,0.54927874,0.00005206589,0.00003118659,0.0023422267,0.43052548,0.000056340745,0.0005746504,0.0016098174,0.002962205,0.0119732255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011906894,0.000096234755,0.29854548,0.00005084266,0.00001638696,0.00051587424,0.69576585,0.00006278404,0.00010908394,0.00010153536,0.0046931305,0.0000309182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9149609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.957884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08503908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013294989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021088911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17107975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971695699","doi":"10.7202/1061200ar","title":"Pauvreté et négligence parentale : vraiment indissociables ?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de psychoéducation","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029064088924751798,"score_gpt":0.334138441614576,"score_spread":0.3050743526898242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971695699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683924,0.006350084,0.0009942547,0.006733841,0.000076948796,0.000030419025,0.0001332257,0.000010282457,0.017278407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954644,0.00175603,0.00022377513,0.00034400012,0.000017657647,0.000014256477,0.00004994965,0.0000036704487,0.0021262285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975719,0.00070897915,0.00009526524,0.00029414956,0.0006802053,0.0006494645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99470866,0.0017093872,0.0014360506,0.00027510733,0.0010490101,0.000821669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025529359,0.00045186337,0.0007477254,0.0012704809,0.003909153,0.002922305,0.0013987941,0.00089188106,0.0059759207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011327219,0.00034253972,0.00033897316,0.0017707556,0.0062456583,0.0016768625,0.002808549,0.0016904322,0.00022323836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012505957,0.00009824824,0.77780527,0.00034795434,0.00015752423,0.0014251808,0.15879221,0.00015578496,0.0005895057,0.012146294,0.0014733294,0.04688364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062708405,0.00009590827,0.7866992,0.0006810225,0.000108588996,0.0005283423,0.1974612,0.00019037309,0.00022448743,0.0020658076,0.011894876,0.000043914944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6076329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68709815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6076329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0090010725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011143063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7893557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971720697","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3304894","title":"Monetary Incentives to Vote: Evidence From a Nationwide Policy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Monetary policy; Economics; Public economics; Monetary economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.016229621111292364,"score_gpt":0.30410116981095126,"score_spread":0.2878715486996589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971720697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.950637,0.0011868514,0.0006283137,0.008170505,0.00024603872,0.00009519196,0.0008376094,0.000022120796,0.038176395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932024,0.0003315758,0.00014400255,0.001506427,0.00014172256,0.00009183954,0.00025488882,0.000007237696,0.004319939],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99117744,0.0050456794,0.00033573428,0.00056833145,0.0010636827,0.0018092352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9260166,0.057091556,0.010102661,0.0021657725,0.0017448337,0.002878509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0098334905,0.0002495578,0.0006944071,0.0009840778,0.0019163723,0.0024638015,0.001094655,0.0035212713,0.022816954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04562706,0.00042399083,0.00051568187,0.0013312775,0.001738046,0.0016455177,0.0019017045,0.0031725604,0.0017749784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022331005,0.013483086,0.6887862,0.0009737913,0.001189559,0.00056053454,0.005657134,0.002829394,0.0016788819,0.05621363,0.04323464,0.16306216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037951046,0.00448435,0.915738,0.0005068492,0.0014775236,0.00014160167,0.010364627,0.0029585396,0.001653307,0.0132642435,0.04551931,0.000096541946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010384849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016853018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022816954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011614896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018474769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076330304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972313579","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104223","title":"Adjustment cost and incentives to work: Evidence from a disability insurance program","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Melbourne; University of Calgary","keywords":"Incentive; Economics; Earnings; Disability insurance; Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Price elasticity of demand; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Social security; Accounting","score_opus":0.08196619627696262,"score_gpt":0.31618681673586296,"score_spread":0.23422062045890035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972313579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99046516,0.0023652373,0.00010535403,0.0017077888,0.000049791546,0.00008229093,0.00079599983,0.000004920083,0.004423388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977003,0.0008513005,0.00005296189,0.00031422434,0.000040460935,0.000026085701,0.00025978417,0.0000024131807,0.0007524593],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962225,0.0021724598,0.00017841048,0.00019243495,0.00043697507,0.00079716137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9531253,0.031630583,0.01034728,0.001278081,0.00094447215,0.0026743524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042601945,0.00032606968,0.0007688635,0.0012353573,0.0010988369,0.0014916124,0.0013522144,0.0019220847,0.0108216535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028523888,0.00036388327,0.0012351191,0.00209576,0.0014280152,0.0010833018,0.0016105484,0.0015708071,0.00032190085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.026424613,0.01426958,0.87986827,0.0008103399,0.0019042606,0.00053306343,0.0011959082,0.0018901515,0.0004804384,0.003487885,0.0028971147,0.066238314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002164959,0.0037966983,0.98269284,0.00033008217,0.0017150007,0.0001449554,0.0029192655,0.0010265153,0.00036208192,0.0014407068,0.0033589373,0.000047900376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031404547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038547948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031404547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001426366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021122543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062443495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972965649","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2019-043","title":"Marital Property Laws and Women’s Labour Supply","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Labour supply; Incentive; Work (physics); Economics; Demographic economics; Marital status; Civil code; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.02307730315837282,"score_gpt":0.2453696610831828,"score_spread":0.22229235792481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972965649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809069,0.0010377917,0.00014302315,0.0017316773,0.000018959645,0.000016863427,0.0015765869,0.0000053259228,0.0145628825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943414,0.0003025473,0.00003799731,0.000081747276,0.000009895256,0.000006052796,0.00043586013,0.000001998667,0.00478255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993717,0.00008124678,0.000026477983,0.00006555414,0.00017497416,0.00028006372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799526,0.00030861844,0.00077427964,0.000072259674,0.0004890985,0.0003604903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064591784,0.00009821622,0.00023983911,0.0013436474,0.0016732925,0.0011910734,0.00059006474,0.00034335515,0.00858909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035993236,0.00013623417,0.00022386137,0.0025628875,0.0009570409,0.00051832024,0.0007286772,0.00048710874,0.00043186938],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008166117,0.000065448476,0.9773975,0.000024632332,0.00004418409,0.00014938193,0.0036286,0.0004221376,0.0001835422,0.0025825705,0.0011721684,0.014248177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003163962,0.000015584888,0.99240476,0.000022793349,0.0000058166206,0.00001665248,0.0026741582,0.000119895245,0.000048082544,0.00018768199,0.0044967704,0.0000047801977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88383865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9424629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11616135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011401499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005151039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23369086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973195154","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-24135-3_8","title":"How Much Does Work Pay at Older Ages?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Social security; Work (physics); Compensation (psychology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Tax rate; Labour economics; Sample (material); Microsimulation; Retirement age; Face (sociological concept); Economics; Business; Psychology; Pension; Monetary economics; Finance; Social psychology; Sociology; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.019611718239010496,"score_gpt":0.24571069000020446,"score_spread":0.22609897176119395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973195154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14368549,0.1200457,0.0008303615,0.14968432,0.0048422017,0.000019737141,0.0010394988,0.000029407805,0.57982326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6564378,0.09245898,0.00063125475,0.017001053,0.0051413164,0.000050174207,0.0005284617,0.00004640767,0.2277045],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997228,0.00008605088,0.000008041577,0.00002613574,0.0000800467,0.000076896446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993331,0.0002799618,0.00008238629,0.0000224027,0.000066118046,0.00021591375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076130836,0.00019173161,0.00031190968,0.0007895413,0.0008486972,0.0022952755,0.00035846827,0.0010081404,0.01460481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020327535,0.00013924397,0.0002615519,0.0010643426,0.0012850338,0.0021868923,0.00047697918,0.0014052492,0.0020600597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018930956,0.00022777433,0.06494004,0.0003954195,0.00006847033,0.0004032227,0.025965195,0.0002573365,0.0007021506,0.20606777,0.24534707,0.45543623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024112505,0.00016037007,0.25509188,0.0019415404,0.00005087418,0.0010610145,0.052809846,0.00021770968,0.00019681902,0.1422681,0.5461352,0.00004256165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009578008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023158045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01460481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009795481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013060388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048857927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973447421","doi":"","title":"Three Essays on Vulnerable Workers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Irvine; University of Toronto; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Earnings; Duration (music); Labour economics; Shock (circulatory); Demographic economics; Disability insurance; Unemployment; Vulnerability (computing); Job security; Social security; Economics; Business; Economic growth; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.01696080738656207,"score_gpt":0.23384948763177657,"score_spread":0.21688868024521452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973447421","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009033062,0.08536675,0.0038301516,0.6022447,0.105920665,0.00013787724,0.0005910043,0.00013524476,0.19274053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15642937,0.13384736,0.0042707836,0.18461597,0.11724557,0.0007509081,0.0009113473,0.0003906745,0.40153798],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789834,0.0008945702,0.00009165921,0.00026551855,0.0006114161,0.00023836251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907266,0.005582001,0.00066141563,0.00048356614,0.0016217275,0.00092470425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031503937,0.0012652937,0.000580254,0.002021956,0.0046469425,0.0048642675,0.0012111138,0.00320329,0.01289271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012209052,0.00034485434,0.0009456313,0.0017664816,0.0058814813,0.003878142,0.0033069644,0.005230521,0.0031216936],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000390884,0.000077681354,0.0010444026,0.0001806094,0.0000127108215,0.000099553814,0.0025995604,0.00015845546,0.0001134606,0.05513371,0.90973026,0.030810552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013688493,0.000043534314,0.0023366876,0.00082437985,0.0000103810435,0.000111483976,0.0030270736,0.000093671355,0.000088977,0.022599736,0.97083056,0.000019718687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035320024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036621615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01289271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003404395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025118543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043130457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977446988","doi":"","title":"Les résultats éducatifs de long terme des élèves de l'école secondaire privée au Québec : une évaluation des effets de traitement avec données longitudinales [Long Term Educational Attainment of Private High School Students in Québec: Estimates of Treatment Effects from Longitudinal Data]","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.056971932162586086,"score_gpt":0.3656613777848932,"score_spread":0.30868944562230716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977446988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97404826,0.006957219,0.0028957315,0.00083577965,0.0001266568,0.00048919936,0.0127857085,0.00007753408,0.0017839072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98473203,0.0013258979,0.0022016692,0.00042983724,0.000036598653,0.0006718751,0.004845747,0.00002811849,0.0057281],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948702,0.0025896586,0.000384865,0.000777768,0.00093348266,0.00044408365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757953,0.010052098,0.0043696584,0.0023716413,0.00630978,0.001101475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011367286,0.00071514345,0.00094537897,0.0010161216,0.0014025846,0.0011990217,0.0011068528,0.0009489616,0.0038014702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021520965,0.00034751158,0.0034469508,0.0022845143,0.00076357415,0.00058492384,0.0009154981,0.00090770837,0.0003666565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022154697,0.00028685146,0.9625564,0.00042910888,0.003809804,0.00007256573,0.001010802,0.0010039369,0.00076795375,0.00013006628,0.0022968051,0.025420332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070086906,0.0006031257,0.995327,0.00009265776,0.0011527438,0.000017989923,0.0002543346,0.0003561341,0.00031993663,0.00003091417,0.00175879,0.00001633759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82262677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83707047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17737323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006145115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008052639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3568356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978406053","doi":"10.32535/ijabim.v4i2.570","title":"Gender Imbalance in Nigeria’s Legislature: A Peep into the 7th and 8th Assemblies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Applied Business and International Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Berger (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012035842721125088,"score_gpt":0.2697634100193091,"score_spread":0.257727567298184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978406053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9148219,0.0028240047,0.00029492922,0.009787611,0.00027581237,0.00002673544,0.00009502214,0.0000064138812,0.07186758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99246174,0.00084133225,0.000103436636,0.0005677103,0.000060413626,0.000016703923,0.000027703383,0.0000057174393,0.0059152683],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979075,0.00072673114,0.00007243851,0.00018367387,0.00032882663,0.000780822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984559,0.0004745745,0.00048335167,0.000052460444,0.00019700146,0.0003366746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023188905,0.00013603842,0.0002589945,0.0010169297,0.0068133855,0.003290098,0.0003561939,0.0009156265,0.007644014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029137519,0.00023308718,0.0001770626,0.001127573,0.0029755034,0.0019211345,0.0019174244,0.001563589,0.0004483436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033924603,0.0001951289,0.22525407,0.00034763434,0.000021939453,0.0019774633,0.41614604,0.00012555007,0.0018726337,0.22303425,0.012542679,0.118143365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000945256,0.00014812248,0.3566454,0.00079022086,0.000017419827,0.0006416983,0.45911118,0.00014175697,0.00073634315,0.0077054924,0.1740212,0.000031513973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014465318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042868473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014465318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039071925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003805284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028762281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979587450","doi":"","title":"The impact of the knowledge-based economy on women's participation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge economy; Knowledge society; Work (physics); New economy; Information economy; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Economy; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0225569698079757,"score_gpt":0.3162819727450624,"score_spread":0.2937250029370867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979587450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78486204,0.002205729,0.00028763097,0.009389116,0.00008206962,0.00003535167,0.00021744803,0.0000096130225,0.20291108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910087,0.00089743227,0.00006705,0.0002594065,0.000016177708,0.000013327892,0.00003203073,0.0000032076628,0.0077027315],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971132,0.00074395514,0.000042484655,0.00011938957,0.00053301087,0.001447987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981213,0.0007640183,0.00021304075,0.000048899703,0.00024016885,0.00061262865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014106346,0.00016901465,0.00024790913,0.0010607383,0.0054284725,0.0053854818,0.0007552001,0.00077959005,0.010488502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004089062,0.000111995374,0.0002543365,0.0015261248,0.0049104337,0.0015311467,0.0037745347,0.0006578063,0.00035518373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018507426,0.00015986565,0.15462562,0.00029575347,0.000038558388,0.0015348765,0.5480128,0.0002856406,0.0015700586,0.115562774,0.008034121,0.16969481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016508015,0.0000840712,0.27988932,0.00046869868,0.000029782968,0.00046920276,0.5489768,0.00013549416,0.0004562754,0.010132698,0.1593027,0.0000385926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25577235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41706538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25577235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008430427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0118267555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5085672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979797233","doi":"10.1177/0958928720963324","title":"Reducing mommy penalties with daddy quotas","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural experiment; Difference in differences; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Significant difference; Percentage point; Economics; Labour economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0443435289234627,"score_gpt":0.3097906158552715,"score_spread":0.2654470869318088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979797233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9276229,0.0006467195,0.014181824,0.005619836,0.00023809365,0.00077797595,0.0011581951,0.00037345674,0.04938092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897814,0.000099690886,0.0026109077,0.00087173417,0.00003584668,0.00022176464,0.00013248032,0.00001089678,0.0062352847],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947007,0.002564537,0.0001410942,0.00037637356,0.0010551058,0.0011622059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890887,0.0049698013,0.0024420773,0.0012377946,0.0011017314,0.0011598446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077676955,0.00032898923,0.00050857326,0.00067444146,0.0015808571,0.001476897,0.001410529,0.0013550519,0.013071572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02774616,0.00019948627,0.0003892419,0.0007343317,0.0022548223,0.0008582735,0.0018629222,0.0011595887,0.0007191271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005987508,0.008396509,0.32189,0.0011735343,0.00052211294,0.00094398885,0.012214166,0.032862894,0.021874009,0.15262707,0.036651187,0.40485704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012571209,0.007564675,0.68990695,0.00069516833,0.00031236306,0.00030927293,0.01533255,0.024377447,0.011012207,0.03698308,0.21199614,0.0002529866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089628674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17433119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089628674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056232833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007615636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17821395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980015837","doi":"10.24843/jekt.2018.v11.i02.p01","title":"Pengaruh Fertilitas Terhadap Partisipasi Tenaga Kerja Perempuan","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnal Ekonomi Kuantitatif Terapan","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Encana (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Instrumental variable; Total fertility rate; Economics; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Demography; Labour economics; Population; Sociology; Family planning; Research methodology; Econometrics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0374463722024439,"score_gpt":0.31254142338500557,"score_spread":0.27509505118256167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980015837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91608065,0.0041131615,0.001956596,0.0009533386,0.00015942435,0.000075231364,0.0010594622,0.00014849515,0.07545365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9598472,0.0038965244,0.002710844,0.00014199005,0.000046644982,0.00005046691,0.000569654,0.000028205863,0.03270836],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998511,0.000026879356,0.000013105012,0.000027314545,0.00004818764,0.00003336126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999808,0.00006233006,0.00004236203,0.000018203928,0.000039745908,0.00002943977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003756131,0.00031018525,0.0003089513,0.0005108531,0.00086789497,0.001247015,0.00030754157,0.00022241827,0.009561025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003967896,0.00019159236,0.00021864362,0.0006674814,0.0003311236,0.00052823813,0.00057610194,0.00057724904,0.001562011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089155685,0.0012299543,0.2443123,0.0017013852,0.00016288379,0.007565935,0.009778557,0.0024413695,0.017032202,0.017632889,0.014456506,0.6827944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006917191,0.00078465394,0.6313968,0.00057271635,0.00020186146,0.0063103247,0.02111866,0.0029779254,0.017444555,0.003566745,0.31546682,0.00008973159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022490185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004913491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009561025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050220935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010858735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031984866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980154874","doi":"","title":"Women’s Economic Engagement and Childcare: Moving from Survival to a ‘Triple Boon’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Political science; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.0415869365384216,"score_gpt":0.2898016673234126,"score_spread":0.248214730784991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980154874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.497474,0.014236015,0.0017807964,0.33322063,0.0012183429,0.00007728281,0.00014016898,0.000043659755,0.15180913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97104466,0.008558245,0.0009099945,0.008248122,0.00020095751,0.00010220751,0.000055225228,0.000018908437,0.010861724],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814,0.0008409237,0.000035197485,0.00007934583,0.000113314585,0.0007912614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864346,0.00035584217,0.0001769178,0.000038326234,0.00012532102,0.0006601306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035552902,0.00025315976,0.00029869712,0.00060059194,0.006269219,0.0069739195,0.00086816965,0.0018266714,0.006350167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003690652,0.00025045668,0.00027435028,0.0007318817,0.0054829135,0.0053029014,0.006903848,0.0024134594,0.0005543087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019638946,0.00028720824,0.0469518,0.0005367566,0.000026678326,0.0013700529,0.39649206,0.00019077881,0.0010142999,0.29876637,0.048149705,0.20601796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028151222,0.00020461855,0.03739751,0.0013366826,0.000019288691,0.00033780612,0.60752225,0.00013992738,0.00058610534,0.027630672,0.3247587,0.00003820695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01835161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046277873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01835161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043583782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007912912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036489606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980965456","doi":"10.1086/703115","title":"Reserving Time for Daddy: The Consequences of Fathers’ Quotas","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":243,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parental leave; Compensation (psychology); Framing (construction); Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Family Leave; Financial compensation; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.026165753596930144,"score_gpt":0.2806644461882839,"score_spread":0.25449869259135377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980965456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9765594,0.0005171021,0.0009914081,0.0039017003,0.000071248454,0.000021756136,0.0005214148,0.000016216336,0.017399682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967891,0.00006923512,0.0001407279,0.00033536303,0.000019101259,0.000009310844,0.000102084756,0.0000045970983,0.0025305562],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969586,0.0016438303,0.00007081882,0.00031166675,0.00039368586,0.0006212964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98459214,0.008646481,0.0037745321,0.00069160765,0.0009377913,0.0013574151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004643589,0.00018384066,0.00033570136,0.00037129872,0.0014825701,0.0013688346,0.00083810434,0.0008955469,0.013663903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013503484,0.00018590855,0.00036723,0.00048521016,0.0014513452,0.0007968864,0.0008879649,0.0013214432,0.0005864875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027415173,0.001320571,0.8391989,0.00017264788,0.0003043137,0.00096428086,0.008325636,0.004714914,0.0048590433,0.05700292,0.0129964445,0.06739875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015848929,0.0006027264,0.9502846,0.0001541014,0.0001437197,0.00014063674,0.015810886,0.0032187467,0.0017129108,0.009720427,0.017999137,0.000053632062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061860863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15793052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061860863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027440393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015470277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123001575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981074518","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1906196116","title":"Work time and market integration in the original affluent society","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Subsistence agriculture; Socioeconomic status; Work (physics); Time allocation; Demographic economics; Scale (ratio); Economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Geography; Sociology; Demography; Social science","score_opus":0.024949184685476126,"score_gpt":0.29876379614175075,"score_spread":0.2738146114562746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981074518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99803954,0.00020039742,0.000065454326,0.00010409845,0.0000053083445,0.0000021060193,0.00030469397,0.0000016508674,0.001276706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946445,0.00009935019,0.000030668936,0.00001675288,0.000009061898,0.0000027433116,0.00016476918,0.0000015198743,0.00021081053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957603,0.00012353747,0.000029439874,0.00010438536,0.00006933268,0.00009726139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833375,0.00031143602,0.00071639323,0.00012659439,0.0001323642,0.0003794749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005362508,0.00015210509,0.00029558036,0.0012673108,0.0005515629,0.0011426012,0.00023566213,0.0002483821,0.0039276225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030511518,0.00011582598,0.00024989375,0.0017125282,0.00066827994,0.0007140767,0.0012185659,0.00030540454,0.00036080237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082576335,0.00004694941,0.988862,0.000021114927,0.00009168566,0.00006785758,0.002630876,0.00014383985,0.0002590604,0.00042252356,0.00038067432,0.0069909142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017716434,0.000018467621,0.99798393,0.000008848938,0.000005783424,0.00001910044,0.0012748428,0.00006910484,0.00002157966,0.00013792915,0.00045640636,0.0000022440995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009908635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020191284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009908635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033108034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019674351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019701958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981575349","doi":"","title":"Family Diversity and Gender: Special Issue","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Gender diversity; Sociology; Gender studies; Economics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.22745869200083244,"score_gpt":0.3633803183607999,"score_spread":0.1359216263599675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981575349","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009090336,0.40382698,0.00090095226,0.05547021,0.49356848,0.000116667696,0.0004014629,0.00011056034,0.036514323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028653951,0.25090125,0.00054812565,0.007836726,0.6623817,0.00018539872,0.00051174214,0.00011138631,0.048869718],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909854,0.00022859406,0.00012314964,0.0001703145,0.00019681192,0.0001826734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608266,0.0017918366,0.00021571203,0.00021735205,0.0007063939,0.000985954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023002382,0.0015687908,0.0030484986,0.0042546396,0.0042400626,0.004950823,0.0017860221,0.0061195088,0.026991049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00343203,0.0007299244,0.0014352083,0.0047149844,0.0026378904,0.0045486633,0.0031361876,0.0031989294,0.0029787815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015029967,0.00039317276,0.005821669,0.0018851362,0.00008694323,0.0014682275,0.0012562345,0.00022323198,0.0005441931,0.009193841,0.8690711,0.109905936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025307976,0.00026209874,0.024066677,0.0026270207,0.00012351421,0.002703333,0.0027908727,0.00025995937,0.00019032935,0.0055285455,0.961364,0.000058558424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043953527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011892493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026991049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019910405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028140806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982073298","doi":"10.3386/w26416","title":"The Long-Run Effects of California’s Paid Family Leave Act on Women’s Careers and Childbearing: New Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design and U.S. Tax Data","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of the Treasury; Washington Center for Equitable Growth; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Earnings; Parental leave; Quarter (Canadian coin); Maternity leave; Demographic economics; Work hours; Wage; Work (physics); Hourly wage; Labour economics; Economics; Demography; Psychology; Working hours; Geography; National Longitudinal Surveys; Sociology","score_opus":0.30121076215304443,"score_gpt":0.4688432361161497,"score_spread":0.16763247396310527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982073298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876446,0.0024392458,0.001143746,0.0011508426,0.00008067441,0.00009288685,0.00315062,0.000026971074,0.004270469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99318707,0.0010532262,0.0007171263,0.00031186914,0.00007238589,0.00010465822,0.0027964835,0.00001363579,0.001743586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98954856,0.0070679784,0.00042159288,0.00092806097,0.0013986012,0.00063517934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8938808,0.07670112,0.020374058,0.0047294465,0.0023940783,0.0019205128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014412297,0.0003274675,0.0008316395,0.0017216065,0.0012752429,0.0018019746,0.002376728,0.0009149619,0.003800358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03297962,0.0005414238,0.0013364207,0.002393913,0.0011155492,0.00088575087,0.001389786,0.00223018,0.0003286535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010231452,0.0008846971,0.97932005,0.00010562114,0.0013918503,0.00014912167,0.00077503314,0.0013665714,0.000070284135,0.0012446637,0.002791606,0.010877333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019423576,0.00054677733,0.9875634,0.00013178382,0.0012400533,0.00005615793,0.0013692371,0.004591759,0.0001658322,0.00049644493,0.0036146787,0.000029568522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21440005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19389094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21440005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020871796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020704237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42630422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984498619","doi":"","title":"Beyond shelter: the power of women stepping into connection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Lu Zone Ul (Laurentian University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Connection (principal bundle); Stepping stone; Power (physics); Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Physics; Economics; Economic growth; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.007214004944294021,"score_gpt":0.2212314251017171,"score_spread":0.21401742015742306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984498619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5267835,0.01066363,0.0077167978,0.1571579,0.0028451704,0.00031246117,0.00017135304,0.00023959263,0.29410958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9485108,0.003613714,0.0020978358,0.013609086,0.0002449985,0.00019063949,0.00006003465,0.00014574466,0.031527072],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994145,0.0042104297,0.000071742,0.0003852531,0.0003745239,0.00081318564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941638,0.00272365,0.0004757145,0.0004396997,0.000446446,0.0017506945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055617644,0.00053521805,0.0006296029,0.0012105296,0.022111526,0.010903706,0.0023234144,0.0029211685,0.007954948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0101953745,0.00054064096,0.00047138327,0.0012469419,0.033148028,0.010721681,0.018035483,0.0068397634,0.0011347104],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038974467,0.000036902013,0.002039307,0.00012804537,0.000011118469,0.0007244395,0.9432674,0.000029457095,0.00039380428,0.0212968,0.009163321,0.022870312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010818467,0.000050543375,0.0010853437,0.00034481823,0.000010702456,0.0004291015,0.8535442,0.00005423748,0.0001514302,0.007930294,0.1363708,0.000017791039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010401676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01936335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022111526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003229045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007938847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02941382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986400683","doi":"10.1111/apel.12272","title":"How do private transfers respond to public transfers? Evolutionary evidence from Thailand","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian-Pacific Economic Literature","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Assumption University","funders":"","keywords":"Crowding out; Economics; Public economics; Transfer (computing); Econometric analysis; Crowding; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.015158809497409935,"score_gpt":0.23733498837696468,"score_spread":0.22217617887955474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986400683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911611,0.0004641574,0.00031613567,0.0005699507,0.0000063072084,0.0000042882407,0.0001649096,0.0000043184996,0.0073088887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987564,0.00025572497,0.000061497674,0.000024692721,0.000002609998,0.0000022843512,0.00004827091,0.0000018419599,0.00084660656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943,0.00025976147,0.00001691041,0.000074704636,0.000041307787,0.00017724907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791986,0.00076400244,0.00072925375,0.00010832088,0.00022381147,0.0002547903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089581404,0.00018217597,0.00019971085,0.00081628026,0.0007926626,0.0012486802,0.00033653819,0.00033926556,0.007701129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003459489,0.00013164798,0.00020458044,0.0016974912,0.0010381532,0.0011845749,0.0011994541,0.0005646962,0.00031122708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062907155,0.00015713117,0.8396106,0.0002456362,0.00024534873,0.0030408269,0.03199092,0.0070988485,0.0017352932,0.02206219,0.0022810227,0.09090311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020708778,0.00011549612,0.93512905,0.00014181845,0.00009040065,0.00040146505,0.04317417,0.00390881,0.00048182716,0.0072180238,0.009281654,0.000036689944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021918409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034380015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021918409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009817666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063040777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043581665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W298893810","doi":"10.5860/choice.185300","title":"Counting on Marilyn Waring: new advances in feminist economics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.04395857817905215,"score_gpt":0.34151964386644945,"score_spread":0.2975610656873973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W298893810","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017443773,0.5541221,0.008338288,0.21836177,0.009909549,0.000034963,0.00017303131,0.00013122028,0.20718478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07603793,0.60192066,0.010984659,0.026874855,0.02306073,0.00021949307,0.00020227708,0.00053264713,0.26016676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976405,0.0011109657,0.00007168663,0.00022193286,0.00079089706,0.00016406651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99362236,0.005021772,0.00021214705,0.00023619407,0.0005763338,0.0003311954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046158666,0.00089896144,0.00092390704,0.0033602715,0.0039906083,0.007829794,0.0010923013,0.0027669442,0.016718078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005097738,0.00051243196,0.00037459735,0.005231223,0.013344659,0.009546298,0.0029424026,0.0051061464,0.0027491474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012056019,0.000019395873,0.00016971493,0.0003899118,0.000006248201,0.000070230286,0.0067082504,0.00017294823,0.00009069357,0.4903001,0.3885073,0.11355311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014159232,0.0000024885253,0.0002423992,0.00052382,0.0000011574815,0.000030652343,0.0016850737,0.00006508897,0.00003664462,0.05674788,0.94065374,0.000009593092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02162138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04378898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02162138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012804712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009241723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092905164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989745681","doi":"","title":"Inefficient Couples: Non-minimization of the Tax Burden among French Cohabiting Couples","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Heuristics; Tax credit; Public economics; Transaction cost; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.015392138499742867,"score_gpt":0.23819458285513076,"score_spread":0.2228024443553879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989745681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930248,0.00030610102,0.0012644466,0.00079898414,0.0000074040463,0.000014197241,0.00012592743,0.0000048324464,0.0044532446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988667,0.000087048764,0.00011891077,0.000043038748,0.000006984043,0.0000042103684,0.000035235338,0.0000010314598,0.00083678786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992636,0.00035440616,0.000020021742,0.000101385114,0.000068991365,0.0001916456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612135,0.0019114111,0.0009291208,0.00037908956,0.00031120935,0.00034781345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017132645,0.00020109062,0.0004998718,0.00064448145,0.0015535554,0.0013647253,0.0004048528,0.0006713585,0.009934224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006983013,0.00012261904,0.00026939978,0.00073114136,0.0007389167,0.0005176947,0.0006047082,0.00050415617,0.00021333745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012982067,0.0004743965,0.8022287,0.00015457963,0.00025842126,0.0018240893,0.005900079,0.0044075446,0.00234875,0.08023512,0.0043426193,0.09652751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001419913,0.0004010859,0.9096628,0.000089698704,0.0002424467,0.0020121874,0.01619222,0.014164832,0.00084145647,0.04880545,0.0074105645,0.000035271332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03301511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031881403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03301511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013226124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001230162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06564587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991322029","doi":"10.3386/w26484","title":"Leaning In or Not Leaning Out? Opt-Out Choice Framing Attenuates Gender Differences in the Decision to Compete","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Framing (construction); Framing effect; Psychology; Social psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.5045901213065079,"score_gpt":0.5338127032407138,"score_spread":0.029222581934205905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991322029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99467397,0.000025161477,0.00069361983,0.00028275582,0.000034949113,0.000032901487,0.00004475925,0.000008971994,0.0042028627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960483,0.000035813064,0.0012500131,0.0003057704,0.000024439396,0.000105056766,0.000053111722,0.000012149854,0.0021653385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829036,0.0009724043,0.00006336592,0.00020773757,0.00027094936,0.00019518899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930737,0.0036990189,0.0015073181,0.00093594193,0.00021215632,0.00057190884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034729443,0.0002697146,0.00050456985,0.00019315607,0.0004901201,0.00094470644,0.0003489331,0.0005250033,0.010784811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008847694,0.00026703614,0.00018584562,0.00014141688,0.00093884167,0.0004916344,0.00061880716,0.0009331462,0.0005755117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05202974,0.06158722,0.356315,0.00089125044,0.0004870468,0.000621194,0.024001738,0.002906777,0.23688945,0.04329645,0.010343467,0.21063076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031257863,0.02852871,0.8245159,0.0003140071,0.0005639128,0.00032441982,0.013692062,0.015791453,0.042585507,0.045784418,0.024582487,0.0001912858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017770564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00215778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010784811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003695086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005112031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03607875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994744465","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3517044","title":"Childlessness, Childfreeness and Compensation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Childlessness; Compensation (psychology); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Demography; Fertility","score_opus":0.007086719239502253,"score_gpt":0.2422334048077707,"score_spread":0.23514668556826845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994744465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98488337,0.0021308502,0.000041032315,0.004144248,0.00005723817,0.000007645779,0.00011600599,0.0000024014635,0.008617094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982741,0.00045836964,0.000009691057,0.00011480314,0.000027352364,0.0000034946606,0.000033249926,0.0000011422575,0.0010778377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901855,0.00035901004,0.00004133144,0.00004379423,0.000101951526,0.00043533574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628747,0.00096770807,0.0010457749,0.00008702311,0.0001518528,0.0014601634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011468191,0.00016706104,0.00030094382,0.0013345083,0.0021967147,0.0016523792,0.00055924006,0.0010386736,0.012062879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004804148,0.00013452503,0.0003259084,0.001335633,0.0023654734,0.0011328458,0.0015030947,0.0012558732,0.00029442162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021636991,0.0007364954,0.9576795,0.00004594391,0.0000631586,0.0005060155,0.009156293,0.00012536508,0.000092948314,0.012070147,0.0017907015,0.01751704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019838862,0.00015945925,0.94242257,0.000121480385,0.000036984573,0.00028344145,0.048942264,0.00018002964,0.00006768879,0.0030371994,0.0047134357,0.000015506203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034111463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06924289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034111463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001491611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026848554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067825854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997614179","doi":"","title":"The Motherhood Wage Penalty and Its Determinants: A Public-Private Comparison","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Public sector; Private sector; Labour economics; Economics; Control (management); Economic growth; Management","score_opus":0.08411541889975689,"score_gpt":0.3732003178300232,"score_spread":0.28908489893026634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997614179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930455,0.00047154268,0.0005838238,0.001243982,0.000018293948,0.00002351639,0.00043619805,0.000010868161,0.0041663013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989747,0.00006730993,0.000035526577,0.000040046245,0.000016269458,0.0000074499285,0.00020835391,0.0000029799162,0.00064732437],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975673,0.0006220001,0.00010978849,0.0002743052,0.0006143905,0.0008123342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822839,0.007647481,0.0061868136,0.0014116497,0.00076496135,0.0017051619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028149595,0.00018746806,0.0007512823,0.0015625241,0.00079648744,0.0014969391,0.00060346286,0.00082820107,0.009840276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013362087,0.0002057628,0.0006490908,0.0014754336,0.00096463447,0.0013186655,0.0021526222,0.0012777762,0.000627693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025230064,0.00158541,0.93942976,0.00008235339,0.00034434683,0.00033617683,0.0013183644,0.0021196888,0.0005147227,0.014393175,0.0021832034,0.03516987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014045274,0.00054363447,0.9829836,0.000038608563,0.00010449783,0.00024956,0.0039437483,0.0036532716,0.00030855302,0.0047157295,0.0032998687,0.000018500756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063859667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006128634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009840276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000962307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008449776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03291899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999201285","doi":"","title":"Three essays on the economics of family ties","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family ties; Positive economics; Genealogy; Sociology; Economics; History","score_opus":0.021913756386948594,"score_gpt":0.2304682152279141,"score_spread":0.20855445884096552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999201285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016007729,0.10148684,0.01650698,0.3293834,0.014836368,0.00015732559,0.0009959835,0.00010133031,0.520524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.208908,0.18262503,0.008724895,0.05656187,0.024223775,0.00044960933,0.00090699195,0.000173587,0.5174262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939394,0.00017586301,0.000031091677,0.00007734619,0.00025290242,0.000068780995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674535,0.0021088633,0.00027200932,0.00015949937,0.0004817199,0.00023253477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013599803,0.0005261111,0.00039429698,0.0015721635,0.001782691,0.0028293517,0.00071594375,0.0018905228,0.021441726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005047569,0.00027089388,0.0006664393,0.0021551894,0.0026039518,0.0029351471,0.0015542834,0.0025124133,0.003423597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025328527,0.00010980241,0.001935264,0.00028051037,0.000022888049,0.00015102526,0.0007849818,0.00090726704,0.00017082684,0.694563,0.24530321,0.055745848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017394135,0.00003657304,0.0041273558,0.0010041486,0.000015049981,0.00019792726,0.0009827664,0.00045449805,0.00015765756,0.29512012,0.69785815,0.000028396295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018720609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017395952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021441726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002214348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011274457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07172972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000043678","doi":"","title":"Are Women Not ‘Working’? Interactions between Childcare and Women’s Economic Engagement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Work (physics); Engineering","score_opus":0.10044013903815938,"score_gpt":0.32464820944106015,"score_spread":0.22420807040290078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000043678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9366987,0.0038799366,0.0007014377,0.024303962,0.00023727588,0.00001821979,0.00010536326,0.000012432876,0.03404273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995507,0.0010566532,0.000116186915,0.0012022634,0.00004497481,0.000018333856,0.000022424028,0.0000087184,0.002023443],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679047,0.0022392606,0.000059546728,0.00016783204,0.00018847275,0.00055448024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954919,0.0030270277,0.00057119824,0.00012301032,0.00020600922,0.00058089866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036365276,0.000220668,0.0003710273,0.0007088107,0.00523671,0.0051262844,0.0007285335,0.0010965796,0.0049668807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0080541475,0.00025954968,0.00023981006,0.000956988,0.0074828793,0.0030909067,0.0044574123,0.0017951543,0.00037804747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054045246,0.000037753744,0.04773259,0.00008350631,0.000020334264,0.00080400956,0.920865,0.000036780795,0.0002435189,0.010334483,0.0024673722,0.017320508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004600184,0.00002855569,0.024671683,0.00016310229,0.0000064979868,0.00018972921,0.9457137,0.000031185667,0.00007408775,0.001345526,0.027757239,0.000014020494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019351695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028226525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019351695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022059295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019591853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038478076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005231804","doi":"","title":"Evaluating the design of tax-free investments to promote household savings in South Africa: an international comparison","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Boloka Institutional Repository (North-west University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Public economics; Business","score_opus":0.08761195528451213,"score_gpt":0.30489467968280826,"score_spread":0.21728272439829613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005231804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.951798,0.0011129157,0.003924213,0.0005730116,0.00003765947,0.0025582076,0.00030435578,0.000042279295,0.039649416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895908,0.00095869147,0.00623143,0.00007904594,0.000010353324,0.0009306971,0.00017820108,0.00001051099,0.0020102817],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891206,0.007777961,0.0004753024,0.0002943027,0.001432886,0.0008990121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98058355,0.011199564,0.0031386656,0.0011336933,0.0031123892,0.0008321266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014128761,0.0007456143,0.00063473824,0.002261495,0.0011868321,0.0023847134,0.0009695177,0.00097599044,0.0037862773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033473395,0.00030397563,0.0008891332,0.0025824034,0.0014273314,0.0023783792,0.0017668734,0.0009889398,0.00029577097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.029529963,0.01443434,0.120193824,0.008634498,0.0013402016,0.00090979395,0.011669487,0.16506812,0.013241969,0.13406628,0.0040845824,0.4968269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012595503,0.11262565,0.55101866,0.006196887,0.0043422594,0.00079504336,0.03408309,0.06818662,0.045407407,0.026683446,0.13759017,0.00047529885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013469929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021142183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014128761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013367206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064879344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096986294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006900771","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/tx2vh","title":"The Effects of Paternity Leave on Parents’ Earnings Trajectories and Earnings Inequality","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Parental leave; Inequality; Demographic economics; Maternity leave; Labour economics; Economics; Family Leave; Work (physics); Institution; Sociology; National Longitudinal Surveys","score_opus":0.014652246203025498,"score_gpt":0.2670440776883223,"score_spread":0.25239183148529676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006900771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988626,0.00007634822,0.000054079283,0.00013818023,0.0000025505262,0.0000019707381,0.00017593689,0.0000012691174,0.0006870347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99919933,0.000028740484,0.000033552773,0.000010147721,0.0000015663446,0.0000020899886,0.00018926419,9.1456906e-7,0.00053432316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953246,0.00012756785,0.000018790544,0.00006631931,0.00007202533,0.00018282594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737763,0.0006473227,0.0008996863,0.00017583658,0.00027661343,0.0006228582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010479725,0.00011156337,0.00018333197,0.0004926822,0.0010482321,0.0007466307,0.00042284996,0.00034508572,0.0037204588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034193147,0.00011466715,0.00030401564,0.000524123,0.0004091185,0.0005316422,0.0008031593,0.00083080115,0.0003126921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006759102,0.000045043922,0.9960873,0.0000013804513,0.0000142104045,0.000042084168,0.0007252918,0.00012381889,0.0000653425,0.00020029882,0.00012530592,0.0025024079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.7713986e-7,0.000015004019,0.9990121,0.000003524351,0.000001914591,0.0000140152715,0.0005703403,0.00019501572,0.000015479603,0.000046753048,0.00012345672,0.0000015244519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2065573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3080673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2065573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011362989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010539935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41071004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008128014","doi":"10.29173/cjfy29535","title":"GSS 2011 Linked with TIFF: Exploring the Cost of Child Care in Canada and the Use of the Child Care Expense Deduction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Family and Youth / Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la Jeunesse","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Indigenous; Family medicine; Descriptive statistics; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.031499200801877056,"score_gpt":0.22266601690019222,"score_spread":0.19116681609831515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008128014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9219054,0.0008027909,0.00043443003,0.0020734197,0.000033106364,0.00021854036,0.06323895,0.00003378026,0.01125968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582948,0.001107724,0.0017837457,0.0003696326,0.000019612578,0.00017988942,0.033339374,0.000036663423,0.0048685176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770254,0.000253017,0.00010210593,0.00013506922,0.0011571117,0.0006502397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99127406,0.0010261425,0.0015635529,0.00026567793,0.0048076846,0.001062893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015378314,0.0004232726,0.00042670546,0.0039743646,0.0029440415,0.0025872323,0.0015350459,0.00042202906,0.0035510683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009800377,0.0004063865,0.0007846544,0.013050791,0.00058101275,0.0009882692,0.0016545256,0.0011550819,0.00030319937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009423172,0.000113260234,0.9706955,0.000127995,0.00009743932,0.000121607416,0.0019319971,0.00079667976,0.0000586347,0.0016308152,0.01130702,0.013024778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064139476,0.000017537643,0.98898846,0.000080322934,0.00002297017,0.000033801207,0.0036051217,0.0018089543,0.00006197873,0.00008830309,0.005265286,0.000020844627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99863833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99894637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06606625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06606625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06831364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47934645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009467649","doi":"","title":"Reflections on Young Fatherhood: In the Words of Young Fathers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Education and Early Childhood Development","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Gender studies; Developmental psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07861843699232039,"score_gpt":0.3643608535904524,"score_spread":0.285742416598132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009467649","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10736739,0.038792353,0.0012976232,0.8150691,0.015434173,0.00002377006,0.0000398115,0.000020369553,0.021955373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7368406,0.027223274,0.00058686576,0.19810438,0.009955514,0.00006730464,0.000024171346,0.00012465606,0.027073365],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905206,0.007550841,0.00017726861,0.00028978777,0.0004019899,0.0010595756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98540074,0.010387967,0.00096605695,0.00020696061,0.0007158438,0.0023223704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016228553,0.00060256344,0.00089750055,0.00039066363,0.0138192335,0.010013807,0.0014711056,0.008958362,0.002753843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020259792,0.00052710273,0.00048863294,0.0005484395,0.025810426,0.009853386,0.008424453,0.022586832,0.000490717],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085250715,0.000035377503,0.0018857535,0.0001236637,0.000013715313,0.0017721063,0.8961046,0.000058050726,0.00036221105,0.061458584,0.031882618,0.0062181633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013821346,0.00005519151,0.000953777,0.00052256935,0.000008141586,0.0008041959,0.7561707,0.000030603842,0.00018570854,0.008028878,0.23320334,0.000023100487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007862485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014794037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016228553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003007052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005064845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08582586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011685171","doi":"10.1017/s1474746420000147","title":"The Learning, Earning and Parenting (LEAP) Program of Ontario Works Two Decades On: A Descriptive Cohort Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohort; Scholarship; Welfare; Social assistance; Psychology; Social Welfare; Social capital; Demography; Economic growth; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.041124846395304476,"score_gpt":0.33660712559374784,"score_spread":0.2954822791984434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011685171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99589044,0.0001412204,0.00006699328,0.00024075655,0.000005386489,0.0000741923,0.0021630079,0.0000037297386,0.0014142952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99366707,0.0004176406,0.00017648315,0.00024795104,0.000007906862,0.00013645315,0.0018890214,0.0000079404435,0.0034495613],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916816,0.000066719214,0.00004604023,0.00011951395,0.00022874869,0.00037084174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985703,0.00010112943,0.00041355018,0.00015893788,0.0003522507,0.0004038451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010820461,0.0002567554,0.0003875986,0.0012312997,0.0036412263,0.0013193575,0.0010293409,0.00047062294,0.0023298496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016712849,0.0006532503,0.0004993399,0.00270908,0.0009371222,0.0008830463,0.0014858136,0.0010021057,0.00047765483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006737182,0.0001199819,0.9848637,0.000024689329,0.000027305045,0.00027449752,0.009874979,0.00001535102,0.0002347555,0.00020676045,0.0010736556,0.0032169865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009001942,0.00007672776,0.9855941,0.00004806815,0.0000208715,0.00011532478,0.010919174,0.000043611846,0.00006444509,0.00004149289,0.0030563187,0.000010970329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9386396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9748259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06136042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0110888705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017783554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123443484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016572391","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.105643","title":"Loss Aversion and the Welfare Ranking of Policy Interventions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Econometrics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Narodowym Centrum Nauki; Narodowe Centrum Nauki; University of South China; Compute Canada; University of Chicago; Midwestern State University; University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Southern California","keywords":"Economics; Econometrics; Loss aversion; Ranking (information retrieval); Resampling; Welfare; Counterfactual thinking; Nonparametric statistics; Stochastic dominance; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.12837156289190385,"score_gpt":0.3245595074862373,"score_spread":0.19618794459433345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016572391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7391301,0.004402568,0.17295161,0.015499793,0.00042795757,0.0004351065,0.0016535063,0.0005636359,0.064935856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888342,0.00078414567,0.0053520184,0.0005569132,0.00019812424,0.00011328813,0.00019437762,0.00004270777,0.003924134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852519,0.011570771,0.0003385639,0.00047837157,0.00092539546,0.0014349408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9489775,0.044100888,0.0025324277,0.0014634276,0.001392059,0.0015336858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024654992,0.0011953294,0.0034524782,0.004078045,0.00086385716,0.0046779,0.0010580322,0.0024758007,0.010927206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059421323,0.00050616363,0.0011561271,0.00161214,0.0033318298,0.003941165,0.00248137,0.0027676485,0.00057372847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005662657,0.0012435475,0.025174228,0.0011424741,0.0013088915,0.0003478053,0.00052478176,0.1953095,0.0017788076,0.56923264,0.020485042,0.17778963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076265435,0.0011266668,0.0126618575,0.00023644502,0.0003269565,0.00011140224,0.0010361444,0.18060635,0.0007448475,0.7982651,0.0040259915,0.000095536525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014223888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010993452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024654992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024444608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020452286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13038963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017325309","doi":"10.1111/iere.12626","title":"SPOUSES, CHILDREN, AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Spouse; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Business; Family business; Labour economics; Economics; Marketing; Finance; Sociology","score_opus":0.030809412298335396,"score_gpt":0.30912168886919994,"score_spread":0.27831227657086455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017325309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95884466,0.025823181,0.00038571257,0.0018486504,0.000055785287,0.000006677704,0.0005056638,0.0000035652956,0.012526119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98963565,0.009198919,0.00009122098,0.00006569674,0.000042625026,0.000002355818,0.00011543845,8.721508e-7,0.0008472],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999736,0.0001454593,0.000012014501,0.00002094749,0.000044749042,0.000040800656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726653,0.0013217537,0.00086756574,0.000068053785,0.0001253728,0.00035065864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009156378,0.00009526827,0.00026503313,0.00085661944,0.0002922124,0.00063693593,0.00014456983,0.00024067776,0.005928835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031171606,0.000080745805,0.00020948105,0.0012364526,0.00036636964,0.00037465378,0.00038562846,0.00029658587,0.0002661742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010324902,0.0001491993,0.9364505,0.00016261656,0.00017523064,0.00030819376,0.0007227978,0.0008476251,0.00011208142,0.010265282,0.0023667442,0.04833645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016934155,0.00012483302,0.9744675,0.0003146819,0.00010953608,0.00040257184,0.0021704626,0.00068298005,0.00010759422,0.005585435,0.016006844,0.0000106478665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004163436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061609168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005928835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023087625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031497923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019833982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3019055820","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.4817","title":"Inégalités et justice fiscale : le Canada devrait-il imposer les successions ?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.015887689125951707,"score_gpt":0.2706551766413588,"score_spread":0.25476748751540707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3019055820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09273363,0.01076953,0.0035206196,0.19207124,0.0009279972,0.000055672263,0.00034232726,0.000049910006,0.6995292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87607205,0.0044200043,0.0008441258,0.014935273,0.0003483924,0.000039972023,0.00008976191,0.00006609394,0.10318438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969104,0.00043617183,0.000047784215,0.00025067985,0.0008489477,0.001506011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987325,0.00021741669,0.000112606846,0.00008252348,0.0004615335,0.00039337773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016396599,0.0003881392,0.00040582634,0.0012148664,0.018820252,0.011312405,0.0018421464,0.0033573555,0.007760918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004143626,0.00020100187,0.0003804325,0.0019772386,0.024047598,0.0040528537,0.0035974106,0.006330398,0.00054202456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013695226,0.000008228628,0.0009403655,0.000021645934,0.0000041303874,0.000057234414,0.0048224856,0.000103253486,0.000039765648,0.98156047,0.008889542,0.003539305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053775922,0.000023045948,0.0100010615,0.000583374,0.000034204815,0.00014687904,0.030028392,0.00073467055,0.00042782514,0.3503717,0.60753334,0.00006166945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85590297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9225471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14409703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06052565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080509655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4391464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021156423","doi":"10.3386/w14624","title":"Do Child Tax Benefits Affect the Wellbeing of Children? Evidence from Canadian Child Benefit Expansions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Centre for Biological Sciences; McGill University","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.14763785091914364,"score_gpt":0.4167271872725469,"score_spread":0.26908933635340326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021156423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8253135,0.08484577,0.00022271946,0.014313684,0.00018223794,0.00010487115,0.019028567,0.000025542378,0.05596307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96653324,0.02686196,0.00021756992,0.0012101417,0.000048126192,0.000027681284,0.002712888,0.000013428782,0.0023749198],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997097,0.00040115346,0.0001475754,0.00030838713,0.0012822228,0.00076361356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98551786,0.0036616474,0.0038025214,0.0006287479,0.0049835485,0.0014056483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030900151,0.00037600723,0.00072823843,0.0021520476,0.0027672115,0.002017436,0.0016728299,0.00076884404,0.007402082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014827762,0.00031640704,0.0009931192,0.007132742,0.0015584367,0.0005621151,0.0015126049,0.001302844,0.00029505894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052105077,0.00012555442,0.9229851,0.0009095112,0.0005909872,0.00031120572,0.0039956276,0.00031917542,0.00007502884,0.003596483,0.012267293,0.054302905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002295257,0.000022936114,0.9893707,0.0004720376,0.00025211074,0.000043493066,0.0015509536,0.00006863733,0.000044751072,0.0001305548,0.008004667,0.000016267304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99304056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027604552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027604552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034947027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20028597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022135611","doi":"10.3386/w21101","title":"Child Cash Benefits and Family Expenditures: Evidence from the National Child Benefit","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cash; Economics; Public economics; Monetary economics; Finance","score_opus":0.3585917060251695,"score_gpt":0.4833394898775565,"score_spread":0.124747783852387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022135611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9199473,0.03564079,0.0002451822,0.0046341745,0.000071379305,0.000064115324,0.013933896,0.00001522627,0.025447825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777165,0.015796715,0.00020859437,0.00035379283,0.000031272943,0.000020227024,0.0039788545,0.000006770786,0.0018873602],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986578,0.00024585222,0.00008547415,0.00011967536,0.00061991543,0.0002712666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865356,0.004366991,0.004835993,0.00047291644,0.002596223,0.0011922375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001946834,0.00021232017,0.0003628982,0.0021737318,0.0008744935,0.0010135421,0.000766093,0.00035637236,0.0054235444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014199627,0.00016536698,0.00059190945,0.004487032,0.0007389375,0.00044733676,0.001074601,0.0007130145,0.00018214747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001642272,0.00004567458,0.9768504,0.00020086375,0.0002657122,0.000083809486,0.00046210006,0.00018698096,0.000013354728,0.0009882689,0.0027738183,0.017964797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006390652,0.000012549789,0.99544996,0.00020419362,0.00013528488,0.000031545205,0.00042674856,0.000074014926,0.000021683016,0.000099437755,0.0035343342,0.00000385347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86032206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.908197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86032206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055898773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009260118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28100103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022831647","doi":"10.1007/s11150-018-9425-1","title":"Are time and money equally substitutable for all commodity groups in the household’s domestic production?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Elasticity of substitution; Commodity; Consumption (sociology); Production (economics); Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.06869059926659916,"score_gpt":0.29083101718032867,"score_spread":0.22214041791372952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022831647","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17327613,0.6121519,0.027461763,0.054848634,0.0017269895,0.00004085081,0.0010290318,0.000038062328,0.1294266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7309372,0.25130266,0.003957212,0.0029425889,0.0020092346,0.0000659663,0.00022138898,0.000041534255,0.008522191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931765,0.00027133222,0.000025660875,0.0001391467,0.000115122355,0.00013123258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983485,0.0011020404,0.00018832572,0.00012763515,0.00013431837,0.00009923784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016022741,0.00055620255,0.0013555179,0.00099338,0.00066442677,0.0030293236,0.0016018105,0.0019258399,0.008164261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030522936,0.00037357473,0.0005562124,0.0023272408,0.0074563017,0.0114711225,0.0014941436,0.0011073083,0.00080338016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002890858,0.00004815497,0.002756408,0.0009116868,0.00011208524,0.00016584992,0.00040550044,0.0018580786,0.0012027428,0.8774663,0.0029112925,0.11187285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045142016,0.000110801644,0.0112124905,0.0013754085,0.00011001132,0.00033879088,0.0029179654,0.0013842831,0.00069942494,0.87769777,0.10405817,0.00004967644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005594523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005704066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008164261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022324156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017146628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02731216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023324556","doi":"10.3386/w11998","title":"Short, Medium, and Long Term Consequences of Poor Infant Health: An Analysis using Siblings and Twins","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Environmental health; Medicine; Physics","score_opus":0.3190577689452673,"score_gpt":0.5274265649931608,"score_spread":0.2083687960478935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023324556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99922645,0.00007636758,0.00012978994,0.000021093778,0.000002091407,0.000008980394,0.00042247406,0.000001179552,0.00011162897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802774,0.00014940774,0.00041910313,0.000016792255,0.0000055666246,0.000024866476,0.0011305279,0.000003860351,0.00022212639],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981205,0.00086741644,0.00021931033,0.0002251037,0.0003306662,0.00023706882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99609804,0.0010793898,0.0013546238,0.00055641495,0.00035586217,0.00055557874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027179155,0.00046097615,0.00055885105,0.0019494244,0.0010406248,0.00066102395,0.000701292,0.00038532342,0.0008196673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072887084,0.00057636475,0.0014263265,0.0023413405,0.0004131091,0.0004558916,0.0016766879,0.0006328229,0.00021001621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006975801,0.00003047188,0.998207,0.0000046641003,0.00014511473,0.00015824237,0.00016430079,0.000086853084,0.00012619696,0.00005084498,0.00007433382,0.00088217884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009073526,0.00008950484,0.99742067,0.000010381124,0.000120851895,0.0005573754,0.0005879724,0.000703323,0.00015386185,0.000057941368,0.00027981034,0.000009192485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060066342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0763857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060066342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000705544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007980019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11943346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023607340","doi":"10.1093/ej/ueab099","title":"Inefficient Collective Households: Cooperation and Consumption","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inefficiency; Consumption (sociology); Exploit; Liberian dollar; Microeconomics; Economics; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Production (economics); Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.030451763201544454,"score_gpt":0.26429619702969254,"score_spread":0.23384443382814807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023607340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72398776,0.0003701489,0.18392362,0.0053606494,0.000047582347,0.0000855528,0.00033164767,0.00012634866,0.08576671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910432,0.00008482055,0.0019601479,0.000060592796,0.000011706616,0.000034542587,0.00002630587,0.0000088203005,0.006769902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999148,0.0004205833,0.000022465512,0.00012775323,0.00009366095,0.00018754472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842167,0.00060488086,0.0003727864,0.00024392617,0.00017857274,0.00017820901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013372648,0.00040153367,0.000657366,0.00055431185,0.0008231857,0.0020827479,0.001218597,0.0014622903,0.009696637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034510694,0.00030575268,0.0005126147,0.00084211904,0.002613135,0.0020618378,0.0015625226,0.0009610357,0.0004881849],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005484849,0.00006911001,0.004124939,0.00003144036,0.00003597686,0.00032992588,0.0007389542,0.11660235,0.00034701463,0.87230545,0.0014540827,0.0039058984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049444676,0.00006201668,0.0025577447,0.000037832247,0.000027649377,0.00016464764,0.0008871657,0.24000973,0.00013886794,0.7525177,0.0035218429,0.00002541839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042190403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002724546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009696637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020771765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007258609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032438457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023686767","doi":"10.3386/w19546","title":"Affirmative Action: One Size Does Not Fit All","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pennsylvania State University; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; York University; Yale University","keywords":"Affirmative action; Action (physics); Mathematics; Statistics; Political science; Physics; Law","score_opus":0.3963263960294268,"score_gpt":0.5108460063598309,"score_spread":0.11451961033040409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023686767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07931934,0.0031209362,0.14468004,0.2176815,0.0024719583,0.0002580671,0.00046706747,0.0004327667,0.55156827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.942044,0.00083821727,0.014117263,0.015508915,0.00068413164,0.00025258286,0.00006316301,0.00018766108,0.026304161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993968,0.0027281796,0.00017624878,0.0012528352,0.0011591469,0.000715549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839189,0.008491307,0.001414991,0.0034713913,0.0012815933,0.0014218322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008752588,0.00058388617,0.0016177299,0.0006993552,0.0038677629,0.005004203,0.0016107376,0.00575458,0.031511668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028782828,0.00028215672,0.0011515175,0.0004988099,0.012218608,0.01063972,0.0045436653,0.00436861,0.0032984836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042583026,0.000035682002,0.00077534147,0.000058104488,0.000033115906,0.00009693307,0.0007458072,0.0004898437,0.00020393901,0.97928977,0.0043202676,0.013908559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003334313,0.000025009937,0.00023150019,0.000053185613,0.000017292383,0.00008990805,0.0004391114,0.0013261794,0.00007450662,0.9810099,0.01669045,0.000009607622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021153963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021006775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031511668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022565855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031251055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10541701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025077097","doi":"10.3386/w11626","title":"Distributional Impacts of the Self-Sufficiency Project","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stanford Diabetes Research Center","keywords":"Environmental science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2006519979805222,"score_gpt":0.49273217407476405,"score_spread":0.29208017609424186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025077097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9631441,0.00043779355,0.0038974334,0.0026498018,0.000054056647,0.00029908327,0.001635025,0.00010831552,0.027774269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976993,0.000083282524,0.0005757284,0.00021199851,0.00001135117,0.00009928139,0.00028738077,0.000009740833,0.0010220541],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833825,0.009463277,0.0004896521,0.0011095759,0.0037073144,0.0018475921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791886,0.010148388,0.0041210577,0.0025411274,0.002893882,0.0011068744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00887167,0.00025675588,0.0006882915,0.001083114,0.0012884517,0.001470175,0.0011677948,0.0008037163,0.007920635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03254263,0.00019299609,0.0005924942,0.001713147,0.003196645,0.0011123371,0.003128512,0.0013686514,0.00023181479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0070847627,0.008692202,0.36917913,0.0007015763,0.001278031,0.0007705687,0.004034693,0.07342386,0.004837076,0.17638062,0.022665197,0.3309523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073038583,0.004844061,0.8663689,0.00018872319,0.00034537684,0.00025015595,0.0051739486,0.024174083,0.0048914393,0.06789377,0.025014535,0.00012462142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044377603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043142807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044377603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054062027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004657499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0882386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025198052","doi":"10.3386/w7667","title":"Medicaid Expansions and Welfare Contractions: Offsetting Effects on Prenatal Care and Infant Health?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Medicaid; Prenatal care; Welfare; Demographic economics; Generosity; Welfare reform; Health care; Demography; Medicine; Labour economics; Business; Economics; Environmental health; Economic growth; Population; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10637396768436215,"score_gpt":0.46834461354953105,"score_spread":0.3619706458651689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025198052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79995126,0.012065559,0.0010728607,0.07194936,0.0003790972,0.00009995794,0.0008274845,0.000061048195,0.11359344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98621655,0.0035560904,0.00036753708,0.0027897905,0.00042333084,0.000039327977,0.00015054907,0.000015245383,0.006441564],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984059,0.00070256426,0.000041673993,0.00011160796,0.00018912849,0.000549198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934807,0.0035186354,0.0014449605,0.00027403314,0.00044747637,0.0008342763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030909274,0.00027455544,0.0005180192,0.000662657,0.00092667836,0.0019074796,0.0006891162,0.0019044253,0.019058626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01756819,0.00020461631,0.00043785374,0.0008728698,0.0017688249,0.0029636063,0.0026365283,0.001191306,0.0004785668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004500677,0.0017172087,0.3001499,0.00039075734,0.00032557338,0.000901589,0.0030261592,0.0031318434,0.0016584705,0.17261615,0.020457793,0.49112394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005874462,0.0011033246,0.8766328,0.00061983283,0.0006200143,0.0003266124,0.00811462,0.0022927388,0.0013035388,0.056284882,0.052062213,0.00005192579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0102863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018886967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019058626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014997456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026851182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06375742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025674944","doi":"10.3386/w8962","title":"Estimating Price Elasticities When there is Smuggling: The Sensitivity of Smoking to Price in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sensitivity (control systems); Econometrics; Economics; Agricultural economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.2000775596759096,"score_gpt":0.42631023931212425,"score_spread":0.22623267963621466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025674944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98887026,0.00050093164,0.0044629527,0.00057955284,0.000014592317,0.00006925093,0.001953292,0.000076040145,0.0034731596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933757,0.0002606274,0.0031503935,0.00008415534,0.00000610308,0.000018316603,0.0015604713,0.00003625781,0.0015079038],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997647,0.0004864951,0.00010750306,0.0004391438,0.0006574279,0.00066247233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99048364,0.0048286496,0.0010125531,0.00086026185,0.0022974752,0.00051739806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004088664,0.0007062841,0.0009081764,0.0024618849,0.0028455565,0.0017028912,0.0016462557,0.0009108971,0.001708443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027645098,0.00054141524,0.0012731514,0.0056584864,0.0013971432,0.0007217254,0.0015876241,0.001406777,0.00016564204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046042603,0.0001508941,0.8577444,0.00012162274,0.0007053758,0.0004766109,0.0018430167,0.08921405,0.0011659366,0.007726773,0.004344967,0.036046028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000680354,0.00004905806,0.79898477,0.000050411807,0.000271536,0.00013703035,0.0020652455,0.18665873,0.0015687762,0.0052899257,0.004693843,0.00016262392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99394906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028089918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028089918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02336229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20380759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025970982","doi":"","title":"Household Responses to Public Home Care Programs","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Business; Home health; Survey data collection; Public economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.08395131795940067,"score_gpt":0.3502214499706355,"score_spread":0.26627013201123484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025970982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896236,0.000054104257,0.00064963725,0.0005775735,0.000005116695,0.00010431007,0.0027529758,0.000021324442,0.0062114573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973399,0.00005046445,0.00015637488,0.000055892146,0.0000050142858,0.00006995085,0.0007755525,0.0000011958778,0.0015457423],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983188,0.0008226622,0.000049920855,0.00011787616,0.00022497779,0.00046585724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930884,0.00366183,0.0018224225,0.00050248083,0.0006618537,0.00026292208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017023976,0.00017387557,0.00031835266,0.0006543738,0.0005045213,0.000833803,0.00039997534,0.00088342413,0.0062529254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01105728,0.00013975249,0.00026467984,0.0016599535,0.00044094468,0.0003241517,0.000497923,0.0005097261,0.00038669477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014262062,0.00093441416,0.86839175,0.0002444402,0.00033097086,0.00049096916,0.010513303,0.02047187,0.0014787689,0.012081141,0.011765944,0.07187022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008748301,0.00034140793,0.9511039,0.000053538526,0.00005661519,0.00006858414,0.017449122,0.018512284,0.00053180667,0.004174953,0.007581501,0.000038845166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17080382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16186269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17080382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037292195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093258586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33961928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026773567","doi":"","title":"Unexpected preferences: Exploring conservative attitudes toward healthcare spending","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Public relations; Public economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.08595223352086308,"score_gpt":0.27924777098285875,"score_spread":0.19329553746199568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026773567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957294,0.000031476095,0.00008474233,0.0001867368,0.000003646678,0.0000032647547,0.000050571954,6.233342e-7,0.0039095194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994228,0.000024580191,0.000028367327,0.00005013373,0.000002761129,0.0000031146099,0.00004291434,8.272026e-7,0.0004245699],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990709,0.00039740154,0.000028095339,0.00006427237,0.00017912802,0.00026013635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965743,0.001156945,0.0012217986,0.00018042082,0.00033505037,0.0005316215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016669316,0.00014562202,0.00018234905,0.0010929165,0.0017384298,0.0016859473,0.00024757633,0.0002685233,0.003055759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049243933,0.00007801463,0.00015228926,0.00092953286,0.0017712867,0.0006409767,0.0008825084,0.0008092996,0.00018849384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012053786,0.00007976545,0.94894916,0.000015212895,0.000030732448,0.00013823331,0.037916306,0.00009781759,0.00029943115,0.0036133986,0.0006817495,0.0080576595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000838898,0.000051134277,0.9058589,0.000033234544,0.000012882161,0.00008734426,0.08862436,0.00033906865,0.00021843618,0.0013554457,0.0033977123,0.000013163528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08269143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14546788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08269143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015326791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014497801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16442025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033452440","doi":"10.4236/jss.2020.86005","title":"Measuring the Effect of Child Benefit on Household Expenditures: Evidence from Canadian Households’ Survey Data","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Journal of Social Sciences","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Employment and Social Development Canada","funders":"Employment and Social Development Canada","keywords":"Receipt; Economics; Estimation; Household income; Demographic economics; Permanent income hypothesis; Child care; Low income; Labour economics; Finance; Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.20762782033404653,"score_gpt":0.3446614428888844,"score_spread":0.13703362255483786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033452440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90769964,0.008661337,0.001469639,0.0034510721,0.0000627191,0.00014197826,0.046752002,0.000044768374,0.031716794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97877663,0.0052424744,0.0009418894,0.0002643019,0.000022640112,0.000055304612,0.012049667,0.00001250568,0.0026346112],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949031,0.0010152268,0.00021199246,0.0003339801,0.0028343862,0.00070137385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811443,0.00514273,0.004612539,0.0008830996,0.0073038763,0.0009134482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003784039,0.00035658732,0.00044833825,0.002923361,0.0012689945,0.0011889961,0.00093613024,0.00031119058,0.0033075179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02099191,0.00023625202,0.0006857027,0.010403326,0.0008419461,0.000549619,0.0010017309,0.0006289111,0.00026947094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011335566,0.00004096959,0.96780235,0.00027124412,0.00033754302,0.0000743923,0.0009534754,0.0010689258,0.00008293348,0.0016047183,0.005961868,0.021688264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032783657,0.000010284545,0.99452645,0.00005876609,0.0000612113,0.00001095162,0.0004516314,0.0002516258,0.000049992468,0.000059138274,0.004508663,0.000007968439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9885411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017572207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017572207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022391325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12749588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035320625","doi":"10.1920/wp.cem.2020.2620","title":"Intertemporal Collective Household Models: Identification in Short Panels with Unobserved Heterogeneity in Resource Shares","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Economic and Social Research Council; University of Bristol","keywords":"Econometrics; Economics; Monotonic function; Variable (mathematics); Identification (biology); Nonparametric statistics; Distribution (mathematics); Econometric model; Resource (disambiguation); Function (biology); Panel data; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1684251931384174,"score_gpt":0.31462393151997514,"score_spread":0.14619873838155775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035320625","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31069282,0.00056992786,0.67486775,0.0017283688,0.0000540235,0.00011700155,0.003332487,0.00026633355,0.008371231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94502556,0.0005225103,0.037421606,0.00022046803,0.00007485483,0.000347302,0.002235685,0.000060736864,0.014091295],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987669,0.0007063339,0.000043362834,0.00026718367,0.00007848498,0.00013781678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994689,0.00303389,0.0012189582,0.00074192625,0.00015308821,0.00016316264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028937347,0.0005504253,0.0010872844,0.00057232234,0.00046258065,0.0015280202,0.001608157,0.0013812594,0.007732936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008262954,0.0006088098,0.0011275192,0.0014855596,0.00066818413,0.0016576272,0.0015164382,0.0014462301,0.0008881683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015642968,0.00016018958,0.03698886,0.00011325944,0.0004278816,0.00042828947,0.0007065018,0.7963488,0.0007148516,0.13155779,0.0037881776,0.028608993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025793686,0.000031992662,0.005923703,0.00002662361,0.000038837738,0.000046891593,0.00016694961,0.9284352,0.000119966484,0.06290987,0.0022513655,0.000022708577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01658015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015607139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01658015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087571336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058942055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03296733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035958968","doi":"","title":"How Do Women in Male-dominated Apprenticeships Fare in the Labour Market?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apprenticeship; Workforce; Labour economics; Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.06145913372027416,"score_gpt":0.3626581858232281,"score_spread":0.30119905210295395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035958968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885181,0.0007883636,0.00007839608,0.003794834,0.00006593394,0.000010377273,0.00009520546,0.0000024032338,0.006646277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99694103,0.00050639675,0.000043495384,0.0004915107,0.000030213625,0.000008972785,0.000053812833,0.0000033128013,0.0019212185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881965,0.00043158734,0.000027429316,0.00011767982,0.00015275211,0.0004508926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998019,0.0005222282,0.0005596502,0.000063503314,0.0001644476,0.00067118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020173956,0.00019698075,0.00038929403,0.000998332,0.002022776,0.003063602,0.0005269696,0.0010216385,0.006033308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006684101,0.00022638192,0.00028078328,0.0010326338,0.0017195443,0.002801179,0.0012152079,0.00089056016,0.0014071648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027942134,0.00031289944,0.8508562,0.00006483919,0.000075724056,0.00034555138,0.07431618,0.00013426742,0.0003643233,0.0041423817,0.005208691,0.06389951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025717252,0.00027138018,0.71394813,0.00016128978,0.000023320443,0.00022847272,0.26852205,0.00024856525,0.00019568771,0.002059695,0.014277414,0.000038270755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025385175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04346937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025385175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011416249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001315968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050474823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036227800","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110054","title":"The Baycrest Quick-Response Caregiver Tool: A novel non-pharmacologic intervention for caregivers of family members with responsive behaviors","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Prosocial behavior; Context (archaeology); Compliance (psychology); Welfare; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Public economics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social psychology; Economics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.10142382141406686,"score_gpt":0.4284007830931863,"score_spread":0.32697696167911944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036227800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732756,0.0017680364,0.0070658317,0.0023108127,0.00029358242,0.0024494675,0.00073264656,0.00077679614,0.011327244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91473585,0.003495882,0.06348619,0.0012371488,0.00015177882,0.0053603626,0.00060975546,0.000046804053,0.010876169],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977034,0.00009922302,0.000018998839,0.000023585475,0.000060041526,0.000027866756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994085,0.00024197805,0.0001215041,0.000019888681,0.00004436146,0.00016381551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061609014,0.0004572368,0.0004988731,0.00044082617,0.00055239757,0.00023598725,0.00070824113,0.00040042534,0.009263111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002562461,0.00018469244,0.00024490902,0.00016715456,0.00012276879,0.00043563536,0.0007818301,0.00062596955,0.0005123971],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028616039,0.017030913,0.026857374,0.0011379862,0.00009466073,0.00071840786,0.0026416464,0.00025552866,0.0072806575,0.0002940514,0.024270628,0.9165565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012416575,0.030326985,0.83960736,0.0024643126,0.00086200115,0.006900416,0.015630974,0.006925875,0.013325259,0.001601653,0.06950297,0.0004355123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017234168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009666035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009263111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026885298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011181894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030988157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037164488","doi":"","title":"Gen Vaughan and the Maternal Gift Economy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.022264122519054828,"score_gpt":0.24483190325334506,"score_spread":0.22256778073429023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037164488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1725923,0.021500843,0.0026120797,0.15292451,0.0002200926,0.000019728286,0.00011400866,0.000021720825,0.6499948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615502,0.003928017,0.00030935605,0.0014165181,0.00003916305,0.0000066941193,0.000007107745,0.000004418732,0.03273853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995166,0.00020796654,0.000005606487,0.000030702227,0.00008806899,0.00015113247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994966,0.00024273002,0.000063108724,0.00003810986,0.00007685647,0.00008251056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011310149,0.000113110604,0.00012512185,0.0005590333,0.0032933159,0.002448782,0.0003599421,0.0012450123,0.007118503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020324925,0.00008362169,0.00012004429,0.0006192405,0.0071632164,0.0014617696,0.001521975,0.0007434634,0.00021828951],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055650776,0.0000033162182,0.0006214833,0.000009526107,8.7375673e-7,0.000048859252,0.001893865,0.00008667587,0.000029444343,0.9912792,0.0024141632,0.003607132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017497361,0.000015229366,0.008292264,0.00022416216,0.000008212477,0.00019434617,0.016659256,0.0005242442,0.00026520813,0.5070578,0.46672407,0.000017753238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16317666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24633114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16317666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012985705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006654763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3244537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040857053","doi":"","title":"Household labor supply: Collective results for certain developed countries","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MPRA Paper","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Differential (mechanical device); Demographic economics; Order (exchange); Economics; Production (economics); Geography; Labour economics","score_opus":0.0420358039936432,"score_gpt":0.27956387808284056,"score_spread":0.23752807408919735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040857053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.981781,0.002475207,0.0004024351,0.00008628521,0.000008904853,0.0000123054315,0.0023800053,0.000010087615,0.0128437895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99671507,0.000831207,0.00019345291,0.00001573449,0.0000092924465,0.000017399076,0.0014402425,0.000003865796,0.0007737209],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938965,0.00016797899,0.00006694952,0.00012539719,0.00008273237,0.00016731916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652773,0.0014576158,0.00094426074,0.0003198726,0.00052115205,0.00022936171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012147502,0.00020416635,0.00063127326,0.004804221,0.000684379,0.0010527024,0.00024322544,0.00026958116,0.0046792896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002926977,0.0001543357,0.0006733589,0.007911535,0.0006554124,0.00072729035,0.0012589103,0.00025102374,0.0004491463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019074728,0.00003646824,0.9728168,0.00025886664,0.00038608702,0.0003039404,0.0030654315,0.0020376572,0.0002109663,0.0025640952,0.0008994338,0.017229592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000099978515,0.00009803115,0.987941,0.00010941788,0.00011664614,0.0002042342,0.0062679835,0.000327975,0.00027623848,0.0006695065,0.003965046,0.000013971282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0111092925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013984606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0111092925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004500594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034407948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022089243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045115727","doi":"","title":"Hidden Treasures: A Letter to the Children of Mother's Love","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Genealogy; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.015325609124904613,"score_gpt":0.2445242499203177,"score_spread":0.2291986407954131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045115727","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04889457,0.02757127,0.0009171931,0.654191,0.0658309,0.00024238905,0.00037928592,0.00047503936,0.20149831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20614088,0.015821572,0.0013181745,0.26731318,0.013456601,0.00037476202,0.00017035927,0.0005361326,0.49486834],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987614,0.0005183677,0.00004579282,0.00010883769,0.00027323744,0.00029233587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981263,0.0008562515,0.0001537685,0.000098820194,0.00030931312,0.00045546333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012064857,0.00087867636,0.0005371394,0.00037071016,0.011652659,0.0034512843,0.0007812041,0.0045234086,0.011480843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005233732,0.0005154973,0.00027204357,0.00047783335,0.003326427,0.0037897937,0.0033736771,0.009413585,0.0032890018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027444747,0.000021416676,0.0005660611,0.00010308444,0.0000037737911,0.003310012,0.07255934,0.000025969968,0.00035635685,0.0050590397,0.90603924,0.0119283125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005058298,0.000032620716,0.0010390751,0.00017751506,0.0000030393685,0.0016842338,0.06769801,0.000023487912,0.00013357947,0.0004234694,0.9287631,0.000016781345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012894227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020477004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012894227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030136253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035059103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038407207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049253316","doi":"10.1007/s42650-021-00048-w","title":"Changes and Stability in Marital Status: Evidence from Canadian Income Tax Returns","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Personal income tax; Demographic economics; Demography; Cohort; Life expectancy; Longitudinal sample; Marital status; Cohabitation; Common law; Economics; Psychology; Political science; Population; Sociology; Law; Medicine; Developmental psychology; State income tax","score_opus":0.10457797168336964,"score_gpt":0.33979703950274004,"score_spread":0.2352190678193704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049253316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9642696,0.007141892,0.00015988949,0.0018984422,0.0000592207,0.000069025766,0.012055615,0.00001010572,0.01433631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875617,0.0041955556,0.00012975793,0.00019910441,0.000019110877,0.00002568221,0.004275177,0.000009772794,0.0035840862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974625,0.00027873326,0.00013701276,0.0002696723,0.0010556518,0.0007964892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835437,0.0021391455,0.0029364305,0.0007598355,0.008896505,0.0017242904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030828407,0.00037915897,0.0006381773,0.0059988424,0.005377516,0.0026449263,0.0023620562,0.0007326409,0.007555106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016321797,0.00040684585,0.00073122984,0.020026455,0.002296171,0.0010181934,0.0020627377,0.0012634287,0.00040743654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033875727,0.00008423637,0.96203,0.00015386686,0.00021692293,0.00009689779,0.007998796,0.00023572824,0.00008737414,0.0016300398,0.005070842,0.022056643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006524989,0.000011744465,0.9932287,0.00005751502,0.00004898224,0.000012654969,0.0036119483,0.00006282544,0.000029339848,0.00006179742,0.0028562509,0.000011721248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99756974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99811065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030979214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030979214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034540646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22477102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049768690","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3671894","title":"Narratives and the Economics of the Family","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Variety (cybernetics); Separate spheres; Romance; Focus (optics); Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Consumption (sociology); Gender studies; Political science; Social science; Literature; Art; Psychoanalysis; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.016553842964477497,"score_gpt":0.257290894606159,"score_spread":0.24073705164168152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049768690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34734464,0.0104563795,0.0042010266,0.05852582,0.00019191258,0.000032225198,0.00031875848,0.000015699901,0.57891357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932736,0.0011954446,0.00010005713,0.00020544884,0.00005445171,0.000008988959,0.000011613854,0.0000040550194,0.005146329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846196,0.0011030909,0.000026166834,0.00007646468,0.00015470998,0.00017754156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932201,0.0050305263,0.00070922985,0.0002536109,0.00020884177,0.0005776477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022455724,0.0002181006,0.00024607984,0.0012761689,0.0026435105,0.004984256,0.0004581443,0.001587191,0.01674786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008022893,0.00016998971,0.00013943145,0.0013174315,0.009769592,0.005248791,0.0019723985,0.0009953282,0.00040533976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047714726,0.000036289755,0.0026690213,0.000021249665,0.0000062598606,0.00015159817,0.0061501083,0.00043669273,0.000040847415,0.9828859,0.0020474852,0.0055067446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002864469,0.000025756884,0.0049478863,0.00016449424,0.000006809091,0.00016607746,0.029413717,0.0008320941,0.00008959463,0.9124072,0.05190376,0.000013963422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048118094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004077323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01674786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031454407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017813017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056027174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3067451611","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3601259","title":"Incarceration of African American Men and the Impacts on Women and Children","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Political science; Psychology; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.00607459127843539,"score_gpt":0.2389664311709348,"score_spread":0.2328918398924994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3067451611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930421,0.0013394591,0.0000073529686,0.0009595002,0.00003137585,0.0000051912766,0.0001376327,0.0000010316857,0.0044763135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966767,0.001570302,0.0000099424,0.00014534731,0.000020620415,0.0000053142867,0.00006373549,0.000001561121,0.0015064701],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993771,0.00016511748,0.000015790949,0.000023892993,0.00004472078,0.00037343364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990921,0.00011232685,0.00026235852,0.000021970674,0.00008231506,0.00042893906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047668375,0.00019354839,0.00023092907,0.0008554294,0.0025522618,0.0011460623,0.00041445636,0.0006251697,0.0074095833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019764567,0.0001708068,0.00042605333,0.0012639174,0.00071943423,0.0007586252,0.0015576791,0.0010011671,0.00028803633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003108024,0.0004921052,0.96599054,0.000051861098,0.00006995292,0.001053596,0.008620545,0.00007714786,0.00021616028,0.0018846086,0.0015889221,0.019643739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000090172525,0.00014648643,0.9470459,0.00011892125,0.00004135534,0.00032125862,0.048308175,0.00003999137,0.000100640835,0.0002626759,0.003596533,0.000008995891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.111663915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22877397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111663915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013896828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021691406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2220279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3076048030","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2856627","title":"The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Household Finances","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Economics; Income tax; Gross income; Tax credit; State income tax; Monetary economics; Labour economics; Tax reform; Public economics","score_opus":0.01493443103172024,"score_gpt":0.27461469641117126,"score_spread":0.259680265379451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3076048030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96169317,0.00124251,0.000080352984,0.0050270217,0.00006905642,0.000015808084,0.0010593662,0.0000047329636,0.030808106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965708,0.0002909432,0.000012364534,0.000088912995,0.000027312597,0.0000029596424,0.00012650962,0.0000017526742,0.002878377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990965,0.0003355529,0.000033667817,0.000044606822,0.00012027291,0.00036932895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99409866,0.0023759515,0.0012800896,0.00015439819,0.0006898167,0.0014010728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010343174,0.00012766055,0.0003011987,0.0009363096,0.00090078905,0.0020434463,0.00034584105,0.00084955606,0.023725737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009232389,0.00010862851,0.0003267431,0.0013312238,0.00079538836,0.0011421242,0.0012074036,0.0011349558,0.00062664045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012011915,0.0006812814,0.915457,0.000058865513,0.000099780045,0.0007943321,0.0015724875,0.001233133,0.0002547312,0.027339188,0.0063054967,0.045002628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036448542,0.00018196867,0.9806594,0.000084414845,0.00006366039,0.00017517705,0.0052720457,0.0007315208,0.00017914048,0.004198165,0.008403192,0.000014809017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033179395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05585641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033179395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018499626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018866082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07937056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080302856","doi":"10.3386/w27717","title":"The EITC and Maternal Time Use: More Time Working and Less Time with Kids?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research; Sid W. Richardson Foundation; Smith Richardson Foundation","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Investment (military); Time allocation; Economics; Labour economics; Work time; Time-use survey; Work (physics); Production (economics); Demographic economics; Tax credit; Public economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2346360407588395,"score_gpt":0.45349876690547697,"score_spread":0.21886272614663746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080302856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98282385,0.0016779563,0.00013139399,0.0031129383,0.000054177075,0.000012713195,0.0026894016,0.000007740148,0.009489901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926467,0.001176471,0.00022590537,0.00047755163,0.00007060216,0.000027861675,0.0014542594,0.0000060046696,0.0039145793],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979275,0.000066936875,0.000012350446,0.00003230694,0.000041323252,0.00005427878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982273,0.00038388473,0.00084216864,0.00007381047,0.00013241927,0.00034039526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043061332,0.00012673788,0.00015193044,0.00045435707,0.00022433058,0.0005575109,0.00034427177,0.0004909142,0.006760018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022808558,0.00013149755,0.0004105964,0.00082355563,0.00023689734,0.00037888417,0.00042112186,0.0004746323,0.00038751564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006189702,0.0000679505,0.99239326,0.000012334082,0.00004223712,0.000053440763,0.00020648698,0.00003749753,0.00007743845,0.00028527094,0.00104902,0.0057132496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025430177,0.000017266348,0.99856395,0.00001115096,0.000024232262,0.00003974816,0.00041074058,0.0000436713,0.000034902707,0.000045209952,0.0008050589,0.0000016030137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055688705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08978351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055688705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045891773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064946606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11072916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081731268","doi":"10.3386/w27744","title":"Cheap Thrills: the Price of Leisure and the Global Decline in Work Hours","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Economics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.2520585326410885,"score_gpt":0.49878331199093684,"score_spread":0.24672477934984832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081731268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92164177,0.004462709,0.0073483214,0.014019743,0.00014522817,0.000031726602,0.010908773,0.00009335413,0.041348416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907843,0.0018986334,0.00040289032,0.00023866503,0.00010112509,0.000017484008,0.0019644606,0.000019933346,0.0045725307],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987674,0.000028041495,0.0000048423103,0.000025170992,0.000032156015,0.000032935375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923813,0.0002159165,0.00035259285,0.000042186057,0.000069975795,0.00008130769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038880337,0.00022559242,0.00028517706,0.00068645074,0.00031527606,0.0013094416,0.0002946182,0.0006328383,0.004636522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022189273,0.00015110763,0.0004931521,0.0013599467,0.0006774828,0.0016136081,0.0007353724,0.0011347914,0.0004976217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023228586,0.00016711804,0.69117635,0.00036045894,0.00019604372,0.0011288212,0.0016734444,0.059601534,0.00093615724,0.12919712,0.043835673,0.07149512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006426793,0.0002316371,0.76707685,0.00032360188,0.00017459442,0.0005824495,0.0048798765,0.06952397,0.0009442536,0.10191625,0.054184977,0.00009734562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033959944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036228605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033959944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010094085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048755103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06752455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082855737","doi":"","title":"Determinants of Early Marriage and Construction of Gender Roles in South Sudan","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interdisciplinary Journal of Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Sociology; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.04054010251671306,"score_gpt":0.3446806007868047,"score_spread":0.3041404982700916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082855737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989336,0.00012953358,0.000017167164,0.000092039576,0.0000024191843,0.000001552323,0.00001866238,2.7082353e-7,0.00080473965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99965596,0.00010066299,0.00002068008,0.000010635035,0.0000010656075,0.0000012344512,0.000010221812,1.9823284e-7,0.00019938704],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997142,0.00011060961,0.000009381288,0.000016747512,0.00002721881,0.000121896235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973017,0.000054292104,0.00010934639,0.000008084397,0.000026815966,0.000071244445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003937867,0.00012743067,0.00012511827,0.00051018666,0.0016456313,0.00062883046,0.00018003932,0.00013091727,0.0021628507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095179904,0.000108505206,0.00009079183,0.0007706474,0.0005985108,0.0002948857,0.0007803192,0.00038389608,0.00011089316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049607417,0.00010181285,0.97038114,0.00001806072,0.000012921752,0.00048068177,0.0138635,0.00007399016,0.0007149663,0.0024299847,0.00021268507,0.011660718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013248624,0.000025389227,0.98073846,0.000025174952,0.0000035184778,0.000092965805,0.01763864,0.00007789579,0.00006554944,0.00025675242,0.0010713967,0.000002892877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054495823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15400313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054495823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009941439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011320162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10835725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083141998","doi":"10.5430/rwe.v11n5p16","title":"Explaining the Gender-Gap in Economic Activity: A Cross-Country Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in World Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Economics; Demographic economics; Unemployment; Urbanization; Panel data; Labour economics; Econometrics; Economic growth; Psychology","score_opus":0.21740326387908615,"score_gpt":0.4356229888670196,"score_spread":0.21821972498793346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083141998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970657,0.00073406624,0.00046063346,0.000111278016,0.000018914834,0.000008045684,0.00039410644,0.000002108478,0.0012051562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987702,0.00028619618,0.0001809322,0.00002660179,0.000009761523,0.000005380937,0.00048397577,0.000001678747,0.00023532654],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999206,0.0003625082,0.000041602678,0.00014012263,0.000081836544,0.00016795614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722594,0.0014231692,0.00060206745,0.00024508938,0.00028050935,0.0002230494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021011352,0.00025980148,0.00045659544,0.001270585,0.00043696858,0.0009339217,0.00028930453,0.00033985035,0.002912076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031913528,0.00015427185,0.00088837993,0.0017021245,0.0003310895,0.0007628952,0.001019993,0.00057112484,0.0003686891],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000685586,0.00007803472,0.9903086,0.00003525461,0.0002624843,0.00029887047,0.00079152733,0.00042500324,0.00013134113,0.0007419653,0.0003134876,0.006544927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043449777,0.00010470797,0.992322,0.000056760353,0.00016104394,0.0001798754,0.0036553591,0.0012571057,0.00013652041,0.00028253903,0.0018310084,0.000008780704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010832849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010499806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010832849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029816278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036086809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021539569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084725088","doi":"","title":"Long-Term Care Insurance: Information Frictions and Selection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Toulouse Capitole Publications (University Toulouse 1 Capitole)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université Laval; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Term (time); Actuarial science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Economics; Adverse selection; General equilibrium theory; Microeconomics; Business; Public economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.012599984907439002,"score_gpt":0.24102089880157254,"score_spread":0.22842091389413355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084725088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889893,0.00012253321,0.006242841,0.0004746763,0.000019662199,0.00025064737,0.00019249166,0.000012896923,0.0036950433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997329,0.000055987668,0.0011205482,0.000077505996,0.000009839039,0.00010810673,0.00006245911,0.0000022086247,0.0012343157],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903116,0.007121096,0.00039307264,0.0006176551,0.00093659235,0.00061979704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92525387,0.057565648,0.010673361,0.004975607,0.00061020174,0.00092129275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01715527,0.00042125693,0.0010216779,0.00037140702,0.0006171565,0.0020337193,0.00064090523,0.0015487449,0.009057194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040500082,0.00033981877,0.00044343653,0.00061327755,0.0013760882,0.0012173773,0.00088030886,0.0010784669,0.00044294246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.027911013,0.022367865,0.60358036,0.0012243569,0.0012452946,0.001286162,0.010177411,0.043788955,0.017099654,0.12534755,0.004514687,0.14145678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005040503,0.017261337,0.5517358,0.0004069608,0.00092823035,0.0007591748,0.00921588,0.18059821,0.012579469,0.20714653,0.013973309,0.00035449644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012932264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011588124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01715527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009847301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008657273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09072685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085418159","doi":"10.34989/swp-2020-36","title":"Child Skill Production: Accounting for Parental and Market-Based Time and Goods Investments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.13155380414314602,"score_gpt":0.42676683375679303,"score_spread":0.29521302961364704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085418159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96720046,0.0020624625,0.016956327,0.0008260068,0.00010642785,0.000061211686,0.0050334223,0.00019577562,0.007557821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848744,0.0005041385,0.0067470805,0.000060622893,0.00003615253,0.00004996138,0.00316989,0.000037007463,0.0045207045],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926776,0.00020371919,0.00006342918,0.0001451302,0.00015215127,0.00016788916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966786,0.0014099253,0.00085394084,0.00046927726,0.00027192754,0.00031633378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016981362,0.00073521055,0.00040594258,0.0014433352,0.00034564774,0.0013392965,0.0013689571,0.0005676673,0.0041012317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077761416,0.00029963034,0.0011117561,0.002499733,0.0003689472,0.0010235367,0.00084260496,0.00086193247,0.0005566465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070635244,0.00008469603,0.94747484,0.000075349104,0.00043147357,0.00018027332,0.0002582498,0.013568376,0.0003392529,0.0044437996,0.0015464171,0.031526715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021463664,0.00013531187,0.93393844,0.0001004869,0.00032837654,0.00018979727,0.00067883113,0.049633116,0.0012201029,0.0049668923,0.008760111,0.000027141517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14559808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16143198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14559808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015501966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003383357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2895012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087018321","doi":"10.1007/s11150-020-09508-9","title":"The gender gap in citations of articles published in two demographic economics journals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Gender gap; Economics; Demography; Demographic economics; Positive economics; Social science; Sociology","score_opus":0.11383839249101184,"score_gpt":0.31136142172821907,"score_spread":0.19752302923720721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087018321","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016432665,0.9508648,0.00019108673,0.016764594,0.0046917624,0.0000351111,0.002630524,0.000022697943,0.008366791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11237135,0.8642598,0.0005784792,0.0069015995,0.009778463,0.000060253453,0.0025997662,0.00004540234,0.0034049856],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898756,0.0023742095,0.0023296042,0.0011284293,0.003634488,0.0006576991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81106067,0.13050973,0.020910773,0.0017387556,0.031466983,0.004313121],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012095974,0.0005723695,0.0018538313,0.069284,0.00082961295,0.005841575,0.00088973826,0.0027949705,0.00905499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095072314,0.00039435824,0.0011383459,0.055624977,0.0014967702,0.003365603,0.0018453968,0.0011012466,0.000996724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010420189,0.00018178573,0.0747833,0.1568845,0.006464818,0.0010810979,0.0052228794,0.00037235467,0.0020483609,0.016687365,0.17356844,0.56166303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029515527,0.00032697764,0.35151958,0.12184192,0.008894339,0.0019853432,0.006332649,0.0002581717,0.0009774269,0.012048541,0.49536172,0.00015808847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005025116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013446594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002773693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007616148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06397039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088817181","doi":"10.3386/w26334","title":"Marriage, Children, and Labor Supply: Beliefs and Outcomes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Spencer Foundation; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Endogeneity; Graduation (instrument); Panel data; Estimation; Economics; Longitudinal data; Survey data collection; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Sociology; Engineering; Management; Demography; Statistics","score_opus":0.12031581906637763,"score_gpt":0.4577941603897925,"score_spread":0.33747834132341487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088817181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99559903,0.00059217354,0.0002708505,0.0004432987,0.000004751426,0.000008801873,0.00038320935,0.0000025616184,0.0026953716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987174,0.0002660542,0.000079656726,0.000034410263,0.0000074158893,0.0000075574108,0.00021916645,0.0000013748296,0.00066694105],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936885,0.00028141547,0.000034943638,0.00008010357,0.00011458922,0.000120153076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993751,0.0023377882,0.0025378868,0.00022000948,0.00021091905,0.0009424912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018476915,0.00014771037,0.00025667023,0.00081176375,0.0007533823,0.001409861,0.00033856492,0.00046037478,0.0062567308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008496367,0.00017216594,0.00022565268,0.0013433996,0.00071893015,0.00079240504,0.001084167,0.0008489099,0.00050640467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032704094,0.00011174431,0.9934378,0.000009923462,0.00003998961,0.00006448524,0.0008310506,0.00015644715,0.00003521822,0.0006803141,0.00012386817,0.0044764546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056999565,0.00008104181,0.9945516,0.000035273646,0.000022908738,0.000079282414,0.0028207053,0.00050306355,0.0000865357,0.001155245,0.0006520826,0.00000664365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011061483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013072943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011061483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045181662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005036146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021994233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092031673","doi":"10.1111/padr.12364","title":"A Stalled Revolution? Change in Women's Labor Force Participation during Child‐Rearing Years, Europe and the United States 1996–2016","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Population and Development Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Current Population Survey; European union; Population; Demography; General partnership; Political science; Geography; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04027018231441306,"score_gpt":0.29831016709677,"score_spread":0.25803998478235696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092031673","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055189934,0.9381799,0.00016863384,0.0026368597,0.0003009835,0.000009306812,0.0010507716,0.000006010294,0.0024575845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19890441,0.798144,0.00024289732,0.0007867562,0.00029223008,0.00002528855,0.0008784997,0.000004443426,0.00072147796],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996233,0.00013491932,0.000051365187,0.00008799209,0.000052584885,0.000049822418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995678,0.00014021402,0.00013831745,0.0000133956,0.000104362305,0.000035835223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014032559,0.00024052885,0.0003273567,0.001830088,0.00023049593,0.0006923969,0.00030131734,0.00038531958,0.00084581267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018092694,0.00015158704,0.00052889815,0.0034482107,0.00041386334,0.00064185914,0.00044864352,0.0004539354,0.00012652077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041214816,0.000058751975,0.20434752,0.019242119,0.0017663024,0.00030282885,0.006014088,0.0014670118,0.00072128914,0.011190519,0.029285312,0.72519207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023453116,0.00023143929,0.7077354,0.016215483,0.0007950383,0.00042830728,0.006582766,0.00028322914,0.0004397948,0.0014459089,0.26577798,0.000041167506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03401251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043970007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03401251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010916267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001714112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06762904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092050315","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v22i5.3046","title":"Contemporary Tax Issues Related to Farmers and Ranchers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Legislature; Business; Tax law; Ad valorem tax; Value-added tax; Direct tax; Tax reform; Tax avoidance; Indirect tax; Economic policy; Double taxation; Public economics; Economics; Finance; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.024440632356799743,"score_gpt":0.2460146040779571,"score_spread":0.22157397172115736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092050315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1757613,0.027345356,0.0018710715,0.37478122,0.0033308333,0.00006623779,0.00022934096,0.000033203443,0.4165814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77032214,0.022928497,0.0006080023,0.074804164,0.0026836733,0.00007598575,0.00013482323,0.000046751138,0.12839593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977715,0.00055919396,0.00007084893,0.00027821615,0.0005982125,0.0007220907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997879,0.0008442619,0.00038979907,0.00008804587,0.00044562132,0.0003532225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026659237,0.00018598177,0.0002166715,0.0008906073,0.013298193,0.004219832,0.0010470728,0.0039956565,0.012838015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006887635,0.00020876761,0.00022579449,0.0018662909,0.0070190937,0.0046629463,0.0027520629,0.005160764,0.00074380176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025780204,0.00007235293,0.007242687,0.00008024014,0.0000068851564,0.0007444089,0.014478116,0.00023184886,0.00024975633,0.79584295,0.13073763,0.0502874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007749471,0.000029168204,0.008266728,0.00023581216,0.0000049494406,0.00038202934,0.028415337,0.00017302063,0.0001800989,0.03802595,0.9242547,0.00002441629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050310638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06781003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050310638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008548229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074635926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10003561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095207334","doi":"10.2478/izajole-2020-0006","title":"Assortative preferences in choice of major","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IZA Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Assortative mating; Sorting; British Household Panel Survey; Economics; Information transmission; Econometrics; Field (mathematics); Demographic economics; Demography; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04416894227370551,"score_gpt":0.29961536209362594,"score_spread":0.25544641981992044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095207334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99633765,0.00012921286,0.0014246032,0.00009608604,0.0000030704778,0.000009511049,0.00019318282,0.000004143594,0.0018025407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882895,0.000060956056,0.00034984012,0.000027708236,0.0000047064823,0.000006582764,0.00016102754,0.0000020709006,0.0005582374],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588734,0.002394875,0.00020538489,0.0006363628,0.00056589243,0.00031015417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9420111,0.035822455,0.01380278,0.005773968,0.001072318,0.0015173825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007033106,0.00034179178,0.00045111793,0.0010967808,0.00044432425,0.0017405389,0.00053526554,0.00059447257,0.00671699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02329507,0.00034750017,0.00039135283,0.0010304565,0.0011635902,0.0007202825,0.00081900443,0.0008918203,0.00045636657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044683617,0.00017414716,0.9752651,0.00003392622,0.0003155916,0.00037507966,0.0018126324,0.0025013145,0.0017808003,0.005099495,0.00028601632,0.011909116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002936484,0.0002282636,0.96867734,0.00004177902,0.00013279499,0.0006535619,0.0035161038,0.0059433477,0.0014813243,0.018031206,0.0012073981,0.00005759652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027870596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006510972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007033106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043843512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026650252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037195086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097086640","doi":"","title":"How Do Gender Norms Affect Our Risk of HIV","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"York University Digital Library (York University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Social psychology; Psychology; Medicine; Communication; Virology","score_opus":0.012850158059065333,"score_gpt":0.17497644031881895,"score_spread":0.16212628225975362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097086640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9611376,0.0011925424,0.00042798504,0.012268377,0.00012932764,0.000007285966,0.000090678644,0.0000074566783,0.024738654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998604,0.00030438433,0.00005338915,0.00034042337,0.000017239103,0.0000024893402,0.0000104621895,0.000004609784,0.0006630727],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809617,0.0010425851,0.000033545373,0.00013218235,0.00027581293,0.00041973105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558,0.0014398288,0.0012712711,0.00017740852,0.00051325903,0.0010180823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025435719,0.00014237156,0.00016366808,0.0006200552,0.0014572948,0.004062697,0.00035110407,0.00063943455,0.004414573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010435814,0.00015962994,0.00022183459,0.00032715453,0.0030237683,0.0020510033,0.00082617026,0.0013021792,0.0004657473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001675268,0.0004365351,0.84306735,0.0000395288,0.0001209962,0.00024326908,0.05591695,0.00019156662,0.00082652154,0.032077428,0.0057167914,0.061195534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033575798,0.00022009564,0.80333287,0.00029021926,0.00010346542,0.00042528933,0.11989842,0.0008420645,0.0012228218,0.048236407,0.025312984,0.00008179046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016909935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025044858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016909935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014413326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012251117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03362298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097241435","doi":"","title":"COVID-19: Child Care Tax Provisions in H.R. 7327 [July 24, 2020]","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Quarter (Canadian coin); Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); CARE Act; Family medicine; Business; Medicine; Political science; Economic growth; Health care; Economics; Geography; Disease; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.0650682534340254,"score_gpt":0.3716961047393923,"score_spread":0.3066278513053669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097241435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0116110705,0.005401655,0.0018887884,0.18525791,0.025092442,0.0033876244,0.026459185,0.0021345234,0.7387668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031381804,0.0025714985,0.0027895044,0.27385485,0.0056149014,0.002950344,0.006677858,0.0004479906,0.6737112],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950505,0.0005124272,0.00040639014,0.00040225737,0.001974455,0.0016539781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569595,0.0009210046,0.0004077022,0.00030747842,0.0018389614,0.0008288255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070212805,0.0016169162,0.0013019695,0.0024032702,0.0064182584,0.0076592136,0.003768268,0.026214914,0.03565917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0117735155,0.0015929806,0.001652038,0.0017530667,0.0019555618,0.0023595742,0.0036353269,0.012523202,0.030715628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007103903,0.00016139177,0.0009420791,0.00006590349,0.000011619664,0.00022774412,0.00019082599,0.00023096245,0.00033115043,0.028158389,0.96034646,0.009262419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009267097,0.000088167224,0.008831467,0.00031249708,0.00002174518,0.000073575204,0.00031951597,0.00025475782,0.00041722582,0.0028178636,0.9866742,0.000096391515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24992505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.307062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24992505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010905135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02888131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49694067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3104470763","doi":"10.3386/w28057","title":"Asymmetric Demand Response when Prices Increase and Decrease: The Case of Child Healthcare","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Demand response; Economics; Health care; Monetary economics; Business; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Engineering; Economic growth","score_opus":0.20750206670220234,"score_gpt":0.4840892295600363,"score_spread":0.27658716285783397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3104470763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781332,0.00017806799,0.0034985591,0.002862815,0.00004918549,0.000063354855,0.0003596484,0.000020522695,0.014834691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985846,0.00006256209,0.00041639025,0.0002540336,0.000025764615,0.000018794508,0.00008614799,0.0000051072566,0.0005465963],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730253,0.001480528,0.000103664075,0.00028671307,0.00032964896,0.00049685605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980825,0.014060383,0.0025026733,0.0011381973,0.0010082541,0.0004655875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039357063,0.0002780262,0.0008096132,0.00044324168,0.00041990902,0.001105136,0.00074528926,0.0018040977,0.006831725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025456725,0.00022952202,0.0009750987,0.00049379724,0.0012841388,0.0016855187,0.0012448801,0.002334032,0.00071508455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021172155,0.0047137905,0.45234227,0.0017112887,0.0009842284,0.008554621,0.0074501145,0.06479002,0.06897902,0.24629244,0.020350844,0.102659225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018670509,0.0034572743,0.5727453,0.00017266352,0.00071280624,0.002722816,0.022785144,0.1755352,0.017533666,0.18782538,0.01419746,0.0004452276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00764857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035012236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00764857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014872319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075599103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022854447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107625538","doi":"10.3982/te3715","title":"Transferable utility and demand functions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Property (philosophy); Utility theory; Computer science; Microeconomics; Game theory","score_opus":0.0202644195528135,"score_gpt":0.23986344501008672,"score_spread":0.21959902545727322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107625538","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18782724,0.0017313716,0.62758815,0.007555047,0.00011042068,0.000117071446,0.0008293956,0.00014308329,0.17409821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720247,0.0008477716,0.01377794,0.00026418056,0.00013275615,0.00016097998,0.00017096532,0.00003251474,0.012588082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998271,0.0008869254,0.000056145615,0.00026731013,0.0002944969,0.00022405277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652344,0.002263968,0.0002963761,0.00038893794,0.0003328073,0.00019441919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019094478,0.0005148423,0.00056153355,0.001047976,0.00069695467,0.0019146584,0.00093620963,0.0016762814,0.013111186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010457182,0.00027237213,0.00061187457,0.0013897801,0.0032506646,0.0054960703,0.0014240023,0.0016304757,0.0010238576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001286995,0.000018853107,0.00047095967,0.000025513555,0.000008741101,0.000060753788,0.00016883684,0.0046793013,0.00015494239,0.98860514,0.0005516094,0.005242358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009054928,0.000012841108,0.00053287996,0.000013758549,0.0000038904154,0.00008429105,0.00012405009,0.010992651,0.00008365767,0.98522943,0.0029062852,0.000007196095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020315757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007957148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013111186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022269504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057808124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04386127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107697208","doi":"10.3917/reco.716.0963","title":"It’s time to analyze Okun’s law and household welfare in terms of domestic production","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Learned Journals","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Economics; Production (economics); Mathematics; Philosophy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03496238325496705,"score_gpt":0.2443322186803769,"score_spread":0.20936983542540988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107697208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27615094,0.038474325,0.25634477,0.15269256,0.0012739676,0.00012642138,0.0010469044,0.000088906316,0.27380127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9149377,0.014997872,0.018595288,0.0031640208,0.00070667797,0.00015259643,0.00012845447,0.000071316244,0.047246125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970955,0.000096823285,0.000010793669,0.000048039274,0.00004974083,0.00008502916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911815,0.0005466891,0.00013126471,0.0000813139,0.00005938554,0.000063187195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082367955,0.00032897136,0.000655363,0.00073371513,0.0009908788,0.0019525486,0.0005278657,0.0011184935,0.010806647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002109984,0.00016267854,0.00085106224,0.001086555,0.002856189,0.004820492,0.0016497879,0.002647544,0.0004900283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001479524,0.00002674186,0.0025542805,0.00004971261,0.000026140327,0.00010837408,0.000699032,0.0029307988,0.00023706137,0.9830754,0.0017021658,0.008575495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005548006,0.000048904403,0.0034344865,0.00008050249,0.00001238567,0.000054779735,0.001270471,0.002972415,0.0001590102,0.9625787,0.029367061,0.000015809532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006067645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009815279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010806647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001918378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089284097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036151826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107842888","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3743131","title":"What is the Role of Firm-Specific Pay Policies on the Gender Earnings Gap in Canada?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Business; Labour economics; Gender pay gap; Demographic economics; Economics; Accounting; Wage","score_opus":0.01940180660000904,"score_gpt":0.24185006039874746,"score_spread":0.22244825379873842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107842888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92165023,0.008317224,0.00016109573,0.039120592,0.0001815994,0.00003813212,0.003252205,0.000026340222,0.027252533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927504,0.0015707149,0.00008471173,0.0010162554,0.00003262059,0.000008464644,0.000444456,0.000009880508,0.004082383],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949249,0.00021791129,0.000092199785,0.0002743583,0.00093794643,0.0035527851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98796976,0.0020540403,0.0016792655,0.00020220768,0.0041111023,0.003983658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002419903,0.00033828936,0.0012228335,0.0027255504,0.009280517,0.004676073,0.0025988298,0.0022914503,0.01456398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011234768,0.00032764865,0.0008810985,0.0044001252,0.0031423727,0.0019872228,0.0025496837,0.002953152,0.0004949511],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075631775,0.00032498883,0.82024515,0.00034628285,0.00031273536,0.00075087405,0.011713118,0.0018271089,0.00046329107,0.06263604,0.030855894,0.069768056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058132606,0.000073236515,0.9422259,0.00062091224,0.00015678225,0.00009487086,0.029757092,0.0013705976,0.00032117422,0.0043936907,0.020829935,0.000097676864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07671558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07671558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17994358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5566131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108909065","doi":"","title":"Household responses to disability shocks: Spousal labor supply, caregiving, and disability insurance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Compute Canada; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Disability insurance; Counterfactual thinking; Social security; Value (mathematics); Economics; Health and Retirement Study; Disability benefits; Demographic economics; Self-insurance; Time allocation; Health insurance; Labour economics; Health care; Psychology; Medicine; Gerontology; Social psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.02872460044255641,"score_gpt":0.28284539751853116,"score_spread":0.25412079707597474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108909065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99742645,0.00013530874,0.00028130764,0.0003239505,0.0000045589677,0.000008188451,0.00021861862,0.0000025528946,0.0015989661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989297,0.000108911685,0.000046061075,0.000030558513,0.0000035922262,0.0000059376457,0.000101655874,7.413176e-7,0.0007729059],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965465,0.00014109854,0.000015139346,0.00003901152,0.000030264331,0.000119853095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986431,0.0006825227,0.0004135034,0.000070756134,0.000056824658,0.00013337053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007614837,0.0001295494,0.00031169417,0.00035500398,0.00034708565,0.0010254468,0.0002451256,0.0006392389,0.005437877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033102792,0.0001289787,0.00022831895,0.00067055726,0.00037603945,0.0005200072,0.00073859777,0.00037993435,0.00030673953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007768623,0.00049414247,0.94972634,0.000069048205,0.00016392684,0.0005815609,0.0035327906,0.0076865857,0.0027489231,0.0103035,0.0008695559,0.023046762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027088849,0.00028134536,0.9721452,0.000027262751,0.00006319103,0.000108938846,0.011098825,0.007331012,0.0006784899,0.00591163,0.0023092495,0.000017858014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077336533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009464111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077336533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006966926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029778894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018191516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110902887","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdaa066","title":"Social Norms, Labour Market Opportunities, and the Marriage Gap Between Skilled and Unskilled Women","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Labour economics; Comparative statics; Marriage market; Gender gap; Panel data; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.08738181017222547,"score_gpt":0.3269885119460131,"score_spread":0.23960670177378762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110902887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914062,0.0031427802,0.00024348091,0.00041432507,0.000010328628,0.0000039802712,0.00023408273,0.0000016228715,0.004543258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913883,0.0005846715,0.000040970128,0.000023218143,0.000005782744,0.0000024860553,0.00006374029,4.2078082e-7,0.00013980301],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949276,0.0002753491,0.000023524886,0.00005968083,0.00008484193,0.00006385549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99625754,0.0016761816,0.0015312688,0.000089292946,0.00022092061,0.00022492775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011891809,0.00009653539,0.00021127693,0.0010283123,0.0003826846,0.0008553381,0.00023340942,0.0002576033,0.0022754322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040706405,0.0000805093,0.00017843508,0.0012795627,0.000686435,0.00051298767,0.00067761197,0.00028662608,0.00010861183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009332039,0.00009962432,0.959864,0.00016224457,0.00023250702,0.00019210545,0.0025860735,0.0009888133,0.000187002,0.014736684,0.0007792973,0.020078221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071822947,0.000053630603,0.98584056,0.0001253858,0.000042352614,0.00006482049,0.004312342,0.0010122051,0.000102943115,0.00618512,0.002245537,0.000008007731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00640821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010421298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00640821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037808565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003269338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012741804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113837157","doi":"","title":"Increasing inequality in working time","year":2020,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia Política","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Working time; Inequality; Working hours; Distribution (mathematics); Labour economics; Economics; Phenomenon; Working poor; Economic growth; Development economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Work (physics); Poverty","score_opus":0.06224789547363417,"score_gpt":0.3113229893024844,"score_spread":0.24907509382885024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113837157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9159969,0.0037572326,0.0017447177,0.0057112486,0.00007605534,0.000012016763,0.0007306819,0.000024095227,0.07194707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966137,0.0008250732,0.00023195261,0.000173451,0.0000558735,0.0000065327067,0.00013345233,0.0000036371919,0.0019564237],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927384,0.000111382236,0.000038249073,0.00014551886,0.0001715372,0.00025952503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841,0.00038259148,0.00056014396,0.00011196128,0.00021706436,0.00031823583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053521217,0.00010525248,0.00017397989,0.0014285069,0.00073305325,0.001274305,0.00028311953,0.000461903,0.007902139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024969534,0.00006450701,0.00015757653,0.0021855119,0.000873007,0.0011935271,0.0014782795,0.00067055726,0.0004297751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021724614,0.000116178395,0.6273988,0.0002498059,0.000088305846,0.00070685986,0.019834206,0.0010543412,0.0044827685,0.10925917,0.007484289,0.22910814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069250577,0.00007890264,0.943333,0.00022510735,0.000014378778,0.00040677682,0.0064105294,0.0005782388,0.00040811114,0.013442339,0.03508139,0.000014197552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011114191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015678529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011114191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00120162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059529557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026435316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114798992","doi":"","title":"Thinking Through the Gift Paradigm","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Ethnology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04384587585938319,"score_gpt":0.2824591960221171,"score_spread":0.23861332016273393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114798992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03719028,0.0037331514,0.066332914,0.0457905,0.0004959032,0.000062803054,0.00014022566,0.00009834469,0.846156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9314693,0.002209359,0.011387837,0.0024477902,0.0002027738,0.000085181346,0.00006091208,0.0000913574,0.052045442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997729,0.0011625058,0.000041656465,0.00028772882,0.00037665098,0.00040250135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983523,0.00071817596,0.00015451427,0.00022976655,0.0002739883,0.00027131216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038592096,0.0005388303,0.00042332083,0.0019012151,0.007765061,0.008221928,0.0013113024,0.0028324206,0.0095269345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043987534,0.00020166089,0.00064580713,0.0014569854,0.040907916,0.012222125,0.0038571458,0.0036685,0.0008836392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027605256,0.0000014165913,0.000054791937,0.0000052092337,5.337145e-7,0.000014980226,0.0017401589,0.000051564828,0.000012029524,0.9968431,0.000403211,0.0008702167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007387007,0.0000044292105,0.00013895005,0.00003768705,0.0000023114776,0.000036140773,0.002713227,0.00022646284,0.00004465676,0.9453261,0.05145845,0.000004336204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06622491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059968356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06622491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018375976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012790085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13332766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119111899","doi":"10.1057/s41302-020-00183-3","title":"Do Credit Unions Serve the Underserved?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eastern Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Financial services; Finance","score_opus":0.04297492997233288,"score_gpt":0.2796157600766622,"score_spread":0.23664083010432935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119111899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58169055,0.009281909,0.0001539037,0.36218175,0.0015432399,0.000034520002,0.0004906083,0.000009439413,0.044613983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760532,0.0031893784,0.000040585863,0.016134838,0.00047033012,0.000019381672,0.000042730237,0.0000063630623,0.0040432126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762434,0.0007253514,0.000036246478,0.000068911366,0.00016406995,0.0013810523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99278086,0.0010453435,0.0010230575,0.00011855904,0.0006552646,0.0043769944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026911178,0.00024113139,0.00042425503,0.0009759352,0.0059550675,0.0037820588,0.00087280537,0.0026232903,0.020950427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011174062,0.00017426844,0.00020640713,0.0015901315,0.003099505,0.004401891,0.0024669406,0.0020124163,0.0011116655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054195523,0.0011137424,0.60925627,0.00040000468,0.00007917257,0.00059992867,0.040146306,0.00019846209,0.00028259467,0.04126712,0.12060089,0.18551345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022156106,0.00031557566,0.37417454,0.0022958422,0.00010743916,0.00057615666,0.47074416,0.0005252258,0.00028822065,0.030750914,0.119928606,0.00007185825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06751887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17291552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06751887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035210836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011257971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13425171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120501030","doi":"10.1093/ser/mwaa050","title":"Exit, voice and loyalty in the family: findings from a basic income experiment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socio-Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Separation (statistics); Loyalty; Bargaining power; Vulnerability (computing); Power (physics); Demographic economics; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Microeconomics; Marketing","score_opus":0.04740824071571694,"score_gpt":0.3121542163045864,"score_spread":0.2647459755888695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120501030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99720025,0.0011237347,0.00012003696,0.00021783863,0.000013662324,0.000028034925,0.00002920837,0.00000100319,0.0012662993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948527,0.0029835387,0.00031190008,0.0003086791,0.000026369113,0.0000886073,0.00007958425,0.0000023953833,0.0013462576],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991622,0.00061842497,0.000018247598,0.00004156421,0.00009340022,0.0000661712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969797,0.0019650648,0.00040006562,0.00012616976,0.00026663693,0.0002624648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004220609,0.00013104592,0.00038967017,0.00020901837,0.00071614975,0.0004362279,0.00042697912,0.00040514892,0.0019831879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032665052,0.00008506043,0.00019557937,0.00031693903,0.0011458844,0.00035397965,0.0005857448,0.0006193013,0.00011481375],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01548918,0.03812417,0.37780517,0.0057653245,0.0016110461,0.001555251,0.055252794,0.0013152412,0.04166202,0.029767431,0.00822281,0.4234297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004340617,0.017502628,0.9325649,0.0005992494,0.00040636183,0.00024436237,0.024133457,0.0006400106,0.003756543,0.0034171597,0.016239831,0.0000614001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056342524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015150473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056342524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064813014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008139419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022320986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121144568","doi":"","title":"Influences intergenerationnelles sur la perception de prestations d'assurance-chomage au Canada et en Suede","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Direction des études analytiques : documents de recherche","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.07695900174742548,"score_gpt":0.3871248456768818,"score_spread":0.31016584392945634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121144568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99481946,0.00040898382,0.0002524346,0.00022344361,0.0000097664215,0.000015939635,0.00053735485,0.0000052387527,0.0037274803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951788,0.00038783887,0.00029376562,0.000035990088,0.0000028216402,0.000014931986,0.00023891656,0.0000033688907,0.0038435014],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918,0.00018218809,0.000029644372,0.00011500555,0.00028311054,0.0002100166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658585,0.0009154289,0.0007376254,0.00016381696,0.0011429033,0.00045441528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001078001,0.00023268306,0.0002280705,0.00068661006,0.0014561857,0.0012524399,0.00045273406,0.00027839196,0.00434265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053113312,0.00017213375,0.00021981039,0.0011478333,0.0008408758,0.00034740492,0.00078224594,0.00051191327,0.00015749513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023507616,0.00004045463,0.95588565,0.000046973637,0.00007908239,0.00015485693,0.020153387,0.00026640843,0.0005979862,0.0012209376,0.0004053204,0.020913748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025197014,0.000030084388,0.98580486,0.000035609424,0.000022488714,0.000034583423,0.011783593,0.00012875968,0.00012784298,0.000113614195,0.0019068115,0.000009185551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92354476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9625291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076455235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067747775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010383174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15381092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121153735","doi":"","title":"How Does Job-Protected Maternity Leave Affect Mothers' Employment and Infant Health?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Entitlement (fair division); Welfare; Demographic economics; Maternity leave; Parental leave; Medicine; Labour economics; Demography; Psychology; Economics; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03435177976198211,"score_gpt":0.33673244358009385,"score_spread":0.30238066381811174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121153735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99445057,0.0010283814,0.000093547365,0.0021148974,0.00001651321,0.000005785029,0.00032385378,0.0000047053577,0.001961805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983059,0.0003363088,0.000052542833,0.00019738724,0.000011292145,0.00000367229,0.00011070743,0.000002209806,0.0009799574],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993717,0.00013728719,0.000016414077,0.00008158344,0.00008458413,0.00030846347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815637,0.0006607229,0.00060542533,0.00010373106,0.000113636124,0.00036013164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010960157,0.00016798286,0.0005058508,0.00033042638,0.00060328,0.00094159006,0.0006252427,0.0008647491,0.0034968543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004179675,0.00014686435,0.00063129904,0.00042521607,0.00071309914,0.00039167196,0.0006342448,0.0006253404,0.0002669954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037827514,0.00009881283,0.9833576,0.000036221816,0.00018748178,0.00020888972,0.0009376123,0.000440136,0.0007130309,0.00065624906,0.00048696698,0.01249875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008282259,0.00006111706,0.9976332,0.000020139454,0.00005016897,0.000021961703,0.0009951615,0.00021480159,0.00009247386,0.00026547487,0.0006327511,0.0000045035094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3178897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4411109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3178897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003205485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002397498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63207877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121210938","doi":"","title":"Wives, Mothers and Wages: Does Timing Matter?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Fertility; Wage; Differential (mechanical device); Marital status; Demographic economics; Economics; Association (psychology); Work (physics); Labour economics; National Longitudinal Surveys; Psychology; Demography; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.042555618286803217,"score_gpt":0.3255461414072912,"score_spread":0.282990523120488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121210938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9644476,0.0144225275,0.00052282127,0.0071642236,0.00021165874,0.000023449844,0.0011891705,0.000014683861,0.012003762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99255353,0.003465295,0.00019910799,0.00024246456,0.00006631394,0.00000542418,0.0003001917,0.000010912377,0.0031568063],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991179,0.00021306139,0.00004199286,0.00012537863,0.00022913476,0.00027240545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956905,0.0015116793,0.0013084315,0.00021453835,0.00039678204,0.0008780286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018423139,0.00021051461,0.0005245026,0.00089667016,0.0010377701,0.0020711126,0.0010531759,0.0007476072,0.0056511937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011783999,0.0004021138,0.0003592878,0.001676446,0.000822634,0.00074030104,0.00074466167,0.00075562735,0.0003343994],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022566062,0.000057284607,0.9651447,0.000043888343,0.00012797273,0.00015110557,0.00136393,0.00009718871,0.00009264353,0.0016213419,0.0011587518,0.029915491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009172496,0.00003317861,0.99531823,0.00010733357,0.000056456378,0.00005202285,0.0017870812,0.00010211461,0.000037183843,0.0005651477,0.0019226818,0.000009337257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5383022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6226236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5383022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026900251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004178669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9288337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121241915","doi":"10.34989/swp-2010-28","title":"Trends in U.S. Hours and the Labor Wedge","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Marginal product of labor; Wedge (geometry); Labour economics; Marginal product; Wage; Consumption (sociology); Productivity; Demographic economics; Production (economics); Economic growth","score_opus":0.03519400573428178,"score_gpt":0.3370086069454081,"score_spread":0.3018146012111263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121241915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9658916,0.0035182277,0.0013301187,0.005077469,0.0000733035,0.000008302791,0.011663181,0.000088201596,0.012349528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922178,0.001444772,0.00037161386,0.0003731555,0.000044768236,0.000008961139,0.004138382,0.000011569181,0.0013891003],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979514,0.000046665275,0.000014963673,0.000062874264,0.000037891954,0.00004238181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989371,0.00023252063,0.00045953548,0.000067441164,0.00020352869,0.00009997021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004455088,0.00015586163,0.00017941675,0.00089601765,0.00027402223,0.0007042405,0.00023300518,0.00041914056,0.0030527723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001813274,0.00013235422,0.0001896731,0.0022489831,0.00027975533,0.0006692934,0.00037502203,0.0005519226,0.00054194935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032911956,0.00015582133,0.8406669,0.00022827815,0.00013711804,0.00023546228,0.0023091298,0.009097407,0.0010614753,0.025511289,0.045526374,0.07474163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016996924,0.00010514425,0.944967,0.00014032483,0.00003075706,0.0001987679,0.0019338242,0.007186361,0.00070665247,0.005580347,0.039107747,0.00002612878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03311218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043213744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03311218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010336471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004293486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06583887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121257648","doi":"","title":"Status, caste, and the time allocation of women in rural India","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Caste; Autonomy; Hierarchy; Poverty; Work (physics); Time allocation; Developing country; Demographic economics; Survey data collection; Economics; Economic growth; Sociology; Development economics; Socioeconomics; Geography; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.025275314799800826,"score_gpt":0.3042000846288135,"score_spread":0.27892476982901265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121257648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99802667,0.00008569902,0.000040177358,0.0001330978,0.000003262951,0.0000021771082,0.00005510385,0.0000016618036,0.0016521394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99934155,0.000050443825,0.000024703468,0.000013725182,0.0000028408456,0.000001807938,0.000030837487,0.0000011092557,0.0005330425],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995827,0.00012799444,0.000016523567,0.000034224864,0.00004149827,0.00019699539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985709,0.00029928837,0.00049106695,0.000105036655,0.00009877298,0.00043492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055413356,0.00011244513,0.00014340706,0.001092244,0.0009251221,0.00089464674,0.00035974712,0.00020099687,0.0029922072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023585968,0.00013329691,0.00015356313,0.0010603878,0.00078955817,0.00026463115,0.0011325642,0.00030647122,0.00035607963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001816386,0.000069413014,0.9779252,0.00001677349,0.000020293563,0.00013564719,0.010284612,0.0002942039,0.00066407444,0.0015800362,0.00033185442,0.008496129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006907508,0.00004715759,0.9893197,0.0000118453745,0.0000078059875,0.00007386448,0.008833988,0.00019633281,0.00011229719,0.00038819178,0.0009947092,0.000007240512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020928865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044920214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020928865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054331456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047050856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041614056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121261218","doi":"","title":"Estimating Price Elasticities When There is Smuggling: The Sensitivity of Smoking to Price in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Price elasticity of demand; Economics; Context (archaeology); Econometrics; Consumption (sociology); Elasticity (physics); Alcohol consumption; Yield (engineering); Demographic economics; Monetary economics; Agricultural economics; Microeconomics; Alcohol; Geography","score_opus":0.01508649634248877,"score_gpt":0.2377603998359022,"score_spread":0.22267390349341343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121261218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920184,0.00040389298,0.0029197035,0.00046443418,0.000010643202,0.000053132033,0.0012527645,0.00004498236,0.002832028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99562645,0.00020715992,0.002075758,0.0000637086,0.0000043885334,0.00001513828,0.00093490264,0.000021743523,0.0010507283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975068,0.00057502097,0.000110587156,0.00041901862,0.00066526164,0.00072332704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903653,0.0051193824,0.0011207713,0.0008251288,0.0020352043,0.0005342301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043060374,0.000615069,0.00084120233,0.0021745388,0.0026856512,0.0016129629,0.0015125739,0.000868237,0.0014591577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027898882,0.0004520628,0.0012098022,0.0051800986,0.0014199162,0.00065639283,0.0015642645,0.0013538367,0.00014111811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034354377,0.00010140564,0.90437365,0.00008379336,0.0005433087,0.00038769204,0.0017832678,0.05577303,0.00079928705,0.0059109214,0.002527421,0.027372712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044451725,0.000047724177,0.87003803,0.000044686516,0.00021577059,0.000121688645,0.0021973418,0.11854882,0.001056581,0.003932605,0.0036272572,0.00012511412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99561584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027499931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027499931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023037866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1995269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121275060","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104259","title":"More or Less Unmarried. The Impact of Legal Settings of Cohabitation on Labour Market Outcomes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université Laval","keywords":"Cohabitation; Alimony; Earnings; Demographic economics; Inequality; Work (physics); Separation (statistics); Economics; Labour economics; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.03310266566215277,"score_gpt":0.3291445822025378,"score_spread":0.29604191654038503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121275060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92677474,0.04359042,0.00043822968,0.0024025135,0.00007845925,0.00003113993,0.0013066606,0.0000047891454,0.025373006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98630047,0.010340214,0.00014641637,0.00027448122,0.00004281783,0.000012738046,0.00035363642,0.0000020442774,0.0025271268],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995183,0.00017225169,0.000020842845,0.000056170426,0.00010751156,0.00012493011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906915,0.0002154298,0.00043695592,0.00004165263,0.00009177245,0.00014494547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087407907,0.00010839559,0.00024666378,0.00047334778,0.00034148656,0.0004841667,0.0003089581,0.00028956696,0.005252901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002565928,0.000060918333,0.00033202957,0.0008977186,0.00042806295,0.00031272823,0.0005090616,0.000421507,0.00030968382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006123804,0.0003662845,0.6508184,0.0012116,0.00047861473,0.0005033119,0.002439547,0.0009967819,0.00072865916,0.025220748,0.004016912,0.31260675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000811644,0.00013137967,0.9875929,0.000237813,0.00008063526,0.000096405194,0.0010619313,0.00013547942,0.00007788131,0.0008863761,0.009685533,0.000005649758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043361437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09506567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043361437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006999836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009037778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08621806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121311255","doi":"","title":"Collective household labor supply: nonparticipation and income taxation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare economics; Economics; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.050823287884622835,"score_gpt":0.3396549133291135,"score_spread":0.2888316254444907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121311255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93463165,0.00018657409,0.048195906,0.0011231921,0.000024264966,0.00009886826,0.00018638613,0.000024339546,0.015528844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948526,0.00006539452,0.0014926365,0.000029385297,0.000009426545,0.000041151317,0.000036081405,0.000004427146,0.003468899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988852,0.0004617804,0.00005630948,0.00022044666,0.00012134046,0.0002548882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950623,0.002146056,0.0013517565,0.00093572645,0.00021417654,0.00028987206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029830984,0.00026911814,0.0007224332,0.0003058022,0.0007208326,0.0016129913,0.0010372882,0.0010172592,0.0077346857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009486017,0.00024273591,0.000630463,0.00054061826,0.0014849917,0.0018395599,0.0017578537,0.0006475322,0.0003203471],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079716597,0.00055154914,0.15460831,0.00020257915,0.00019714069,0.0012172823,0.004201383,0.08477952,0.0028969252,0.6919855,0.0014430428,0.05711966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024128144,0.0005323253,0.0671767,0.00013274289,0.00012228079,0.00050484744,0.0044136266,0.19933467,0.0030044718,0.71429235,0.010187705,0.00005697941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003299103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027584892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077346857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001301476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010178782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025875092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121334304","doi":"10.3386/w22126","title":"Targeted or Universal Coverage? Assessing Heterogeneity in the Effects of Universal Childcare","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; York University; University of Toronto; University of Waterloo; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Universal design; Universal coverage; Computer science; Economics; Economic growth; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1332084362454007,"score_gpt":0.4527604460173282,"score_spread":0.31955200977192744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121334304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9614166,0.004164645,0.015135998,0.0026025926,0.00009056063,0.00032907777,0.0029546644,0.00006617341,0.013239614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986053,0.00012624021,0.00052874716,0.00018927564,0.000026159112,0.000044111835,0.00024202143,0.000006569088,0.00023159506],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96559626,0.023663448,0.0010397126,0.0046697613,0.002469851,0.0025609382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8455161,0.13100417,0.010075935,0.009894448,0.0020981324,0.0014112281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0343417,0.0004652215,0.0018650743,0.0017762361,0.00082160666,0.0019273501,0.0018630585,0.0011261726,0.005200354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12524809,0.0002465709,0.0021680056,0.002205303,0.0036467926,0.0015428733,0.0026968122,0.0016290792,0.00016647285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001636584,0.00019418212,0.8897789,0.00045264242,0.006836167,0.00076572894,0.003626802,0.01612524,0.0008986155,0.032735825,0.0020248229,0.044924334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020011522,0.00068401947,0.92949325,0.00037342578,0.0028920232,0.00034805815,0.0043396153,0.02209337,0.0011109081,0.030230956,0.0081615085,0.00007273388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18268313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11168468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18268313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00382448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002190067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36323953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121344002","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3390143","title":"Born in the Family: Preferences for Boys and the Gender Gap in Math","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Gender gap; Socialization; Preference; Fertility; Developmental psychology; Population; National Longitudinal Surveys; Psychology; Percentage point; Demography; Mathematics; Demographic economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.025150783026907295,"score_gpt":0.27863522235292937,"score_spread":0.25348443932602205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121344002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954052,0.00024465847,0.000037089834,0.00053430576,0.000013762374,0.0000021052133,0.000036458474,0.0000010023265,0.0037253418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913687,0.000066570814,0.000011833169,0.000036036283,0.0000066299485,0.0000014872235,0.000016472955,0.0000013600807,0.0007227331],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901485,0.0004949886,0.00002838838,0.000062151266,0.00009642015,0.0003032116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963785,0.0015158054,0.00076773704,0.000075208285,0.00013696884,0.001125814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011217812,0.00018178744,0.00031358388,0.0007103677,0.0017162593,0.001916024,0.00033302212,0.00075198937,0.012194845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044013285,0.00017886024,0.00023196558,0.0005405842,0.0012058154,0.000818548,0.0009017594,0.0009659399,0.0004910282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012522717,0.0007562987,0.9295296,0.000050514507,0.000083106934,0.0012803258,0.038947318,0.00027152774,0.0013193643,0.0064694528,0.0015610836,0.018479086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054803295,0.00039471773,0.8055649,0.00007515508,0.000046859248,0.0006207288,0.18616177,0.00048532774,0.0005378794,0.0024323363,0.0035947186,0.000030793355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012955304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026839929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012955304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006097976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061378273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040795803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121386378","doi":"","title":"Children's Resources in Collective Households: Identification, Estimation and an Application to Child Poverty in Malawi","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Clothing; Consumption (sociology); Estimation; Economics; Identification (biology); Household income; Private good; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Geography; Public good; Microeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02309851060107353,"score_gpt":0.32071037963341326,"score_spread":0.2976118690323397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121386378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827004,0.0003826883,0.01561623,0.00037415468,0.0000043172636,0.000034376644,0.00040398454,0.000021253538,0.00046262075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895353,0.00034214137,0.008579498,0.000021112788,0.000008712091,0.000056510882,0.00053488533,0.0000072162356,0.0009145762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928635,0.00043887235,0.0000284818,0.00009281589,0.000038531165,0.000115017894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940777,0.004567045,0.00065016956,0.00032003428,0.00016722275,0.00021781503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00368093,0.0005330642,0.00093359925,0.0011588307,0.0008313183,0.0014105386,0.00085313554,0.0008371861,0.002341559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010305746,0.0004894965,0.0007977825,0.0022768788,0.0010002184,0.000978889,0.002218522,0.0010893549,0.00014558689],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014070245,0.00015240062,0.8228482,0.000120162236,0.00035618315,0.00070116157,0.002378365,0.12438307,0.00045319356,0.011345166,0.0010739082,0.036047548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055186498,0.00016311115,0.32791752,0.00016664942,0.00013441413,0.00028040318,0.00694574,0.63892436,0.0006880675,0.021385854,0.0032760876,0.00006261625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.090169966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08605808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090169966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013044359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010943573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17929024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121393843","doi":"10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2019-38","title":"The Effect of House Prices on Fertility: Evidence from Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; Renting; House price; Real estate; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Affect (linguistics); Monetary economics; Population; Demography; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.14516543225217185,"score_gpt":0.4954196328018469,"score_spread":0.35025420054967504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121393843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9617677,0.008932111,0.00025978594,0.0023552733,0.000037674996,0.000044661556,0.011756624,0.000017841372,0.01482822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888237,0.006072904,0.00021775362,0.000288723,0.000016653188,0.000011943052,0.0029219186,0.000011245792,0.0016351432],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983777,0.0002459781,0.00009109675,0.00020497452,0.0006681419,0.00041213975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886513,0.0028479614,0.0017756857,0.0006322918,0.0048219045,0.0012709503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018730145,0.00023473888,0.00056743546,0.0020061734,0.002157499,0.0010582685,0.0013460066,0.00039716292,0.004236342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008801557,0.00024607373,0.0007877301,0.006270161,0.0016432718,0.0002819733,0.00083127274,0.0006683519,0.00021266278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028579615,0.00003852586,0.9765277,0.00018460292,0.000289234,0.0001627528,0.0010456188,0.00028747652,0.0001134594,0.0010092814,0.0030074248,0.017048104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016556838,0.00002448289,0.9963708,0.000070469134,0.00010398447,0.000037842347,0.00060531707,0.00012985039,0.000079181795,0.00006465101,0.0024856015,0.000011236986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015980208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015980208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026539518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11594504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121416423","doi":"","title":"The Rug Rat Race","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Demographic economics; Rivalry; Crowding out; Crowding; Economics; Race (biology); Demography; Psychology; Sociology; Monetary economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.007990697662590123,"score_gpt":0.26589963002514583,"score_spread":0.2579089323625557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121416423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02764723,0.0041390685,0.0010618477,0.043401066,0.0020088716,0.000028871416,0.0004093083,0.00012255914,0.921181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26168385,0.004103994,0.0008893345,0.019300457,0.0005674337,0.00004991814,0.00040752086,0.00022763039,0.71276987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993513,0.00014981591,0.000009211226,0.00015032112,0.00012102336,0.00021832644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995035,0.000061330524,0.000041684256,0.000067474386,0.00009139965,0.00023455637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006622028,0.0004409432,0.0004845961,0.00094998436,0.0064404486,0.0052778577,0.00059519283,0.0018601808,0.11138423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020195886,0.00016285857,0.00035299713,0.0009927469,0.0048691286,0.0023046504,0.00329149,0.0022058287,0.019753834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009997026,0.000067294655,0.010433914,0.000053891094,0.000018422212,0.00046788563,0.0062978766,0.00018391431,0.00031124835,0.45818165,0.3952723,0.12861164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005624681,0.00002064719,0.004286827,0.000080560036,0.000003688221,0.0000950453,0.0025422345,0.00006208798,0.00005030872,0.009787756,0.9830593,0.00000598085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07608408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1362559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11138423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029199813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029635937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37261736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121421317","doi":"","title":"Tax, Social Policy and Gender","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Gender Institute, Australian National University; Queen's University; Curtin University of Technology; Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia; Australian National University","keywords":"Social policy; Economics; Political science; Public economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.120307618305344,"score_gpt":0.4279196425749812,"score_spread":0.3076120242696372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121421317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023297104,0.10933247,0.00038050016,0.04051264,0.004636549,0.000029324628,0.00010084068,0.00005644934,0.8426215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0572358,0.08143065,0.00052171695,0.010579929,0.0027725901,0.00007020004,0.00014488937,0.000070077156,0.84717405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963677,0.00009887785,0.000008837959,0.00003504048,0.00014584852,0.00007462125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997714,0.000092217495,0.000018479803,0.000025457175,0.000046061963,0.000046387297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044363376,0.0005023173,0.00032686553,0.0007712943,0.0028469367,0.0037908687,0.0003777076,0.0017453989,0.017307594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011303568,0.00018462694,0.00023312008,0.0016127764,0.004357882,0.0031536722,0.0014240653,0.0024162186,0.003617991],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008090786,0.000026409769,0.00015378429,0.00013922965,0.0000033177737,0.0000501026,0.002387422,0.00020817803,0.000069398564,0.5670335,0.35119745,0.078723066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016641862,0.000005083845,0.0003364637,0.00018068898,0.0000011379174,0.000026246062,0.0005945131,0.00004910041,0.000023214567,0.055918872,0.9428606,0.0000025025174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013363797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020677328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017307594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004646894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052250284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057899714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121447473","doi":"","title":"Earnings Supplements and Job Quality Among Former Welfare Recipients: Evidence from the Self-Sufficiency Project","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Self-employment; Social assistance; Quality (philosophy); Quality circle; Business; Economics; Operations management; Economic growth; Accounting","score_opus":0.024131601868322115,"score_gpt":0.31411257879560206,"score_spread":0.2899809769272799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121447473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99880445,0.00048653933,0.0000086477685,0.00015472749,0.0000048542533,0.0000036382621,0.000058808186,4.1968354e-7,0.00047779974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990823,0.0005067592,0.000014455264,0.00004059693,0.000009934361,0.000004543188,0.00006809783,7.1007116e-7,0.00027259375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991146,0.0004709499,0.000046197056,0.00006945087,0.00014114799,0.00015768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948054,0.0015133257,0.0024552199,0.00020558521,0.00029135236,0.00072919304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025617417,0.00016220286,0.00028826736,0.0009801567,0.0009846527,0.00084623066,0.0003767135,0.0006668138,0.0031066667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008179681,0.00020014014,0.00026074346,0.00085315906,0.0009022394,0.00048058963,0.0009442146,0.0005180432,0.00018290523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010087528,0.00091673137,0.9769736,0.00007016832,0.0001086756,0.00017360848,0.0027680583,0.000047493697,0.00014575169,0.00025735082,0.00046481707,0.017065056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003083542,0.0004963726,0.99555737,0.00006514059,0.000047894897,0.00010143547,0.0029298428,0.000043430955,0.00005662439,0.00007144797,0.0005947837,0.0000047162944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007821149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010227732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007821149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002999536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039402532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015551209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121447600","doi":"10.3386/w24995","title":"Long-term Changes in Married Couples' Labor Supply and Taxes: Evidence from the US and Europe Since the 1980s","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Economics; Labour economics; Consumption (sociology); Wage; Term (time); Demographic economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.2631745388046962,"score_gpt":0.4737653703956945,"score_spread":0.21059083159099828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121447600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887235,0.0044921227,0.00024749537,0.00035719466,0.000024655339,0.0000074126033,0.0037086287,0.000010529999,0.002428449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904677,0.0030508882,0.00012768204,0.00014780191,0.000034375018,0.0000071903896,0.005193813,0.000007783434,0.0009626844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995204,0.00008261221,0.00008531415,0.00011973134,0.00010589567,0.00008602855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617094,0.0007192815,0.0020061398,0.00027009528,0.0005546802,0.00027893198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011881709,0.00017175864,0.00033415973,0.0019500795,0.00027819298,0.00095328875,0.000351884,0.0004492122,0.0019172875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043002698,0.0001784783,0.0004775715,0.0037452143,0.0003513515,0.0005622124,0.00088435475,0.00037425722,0.00041598402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012062992,0.000055467517,0.97919685,0.00007908267,0.0001587442,0.00013806857,0.00073124387,0.0005733034,0.00007666264,0.00046565584,0.0017407227,0.01666372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048118595,0.00002852356,0.9945075,0.00008752983,0.000054151078,0.00008791432,0.0007713243,0.000229149,0.00010620756,0.000121696976,0.0039946707,0.0000065278973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046240013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047372703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046240013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043314896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034725756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091941714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121466660","doi":"","title":"Effects of the 2001 Extension of Paid Parental Leave Provisions on Birth Seasonality in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Seasonality; Demography; Geography; Demographic economics; Preparedness; Economics; Ecology; Biology; Sociology","score_opus":0.023766594941896535,"score_gpt":0.23551459619145926,"score_spread":0.21174800124956272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121466660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842169,0.0010196489,0.0001447921,0.0030873443,0.000046328234,0.000021838916,0.006377019,0.000031892527,0.005054254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931908,0.00060009526,0.00011440497,0.00021806905,0.000010918207,0.000009451813,0.001774946,0.000013028672,0.0040682033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989723,0.00008934852,0.000033514454,0.00013172731,0.00024711242,0.00052613043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946408,0.00089011353,0.00091547606,0.00023206772,0.0015665386,0.0017548784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000901497,0.00025737158,0.00048992457,0.00094095466,0.002125396,0.0014643318,0.0012021764,0.0006127286,0.004789338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064156377,0.00020482068,0.0006098979,0.0019027991,0.0007732917,0.00026889553,0.0012340959,0.0011067231,0.00021112246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001272041,0.00016161331,0.93707216,0.00010311764,0.00023194744,0.00046228684,0.003207495,0.005158797,0.0011107081,0.0030913174,0.011533,0.036595464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014961604,0.00003552583,0.992504,0.000043297383,0.00003578255,0.000018830739,0.0023033847,0.0008849397,0.00017561598,0.000095991854,0.0038682728,0.000019414265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99574214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99731475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043098878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043098878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045503445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31270576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121505579","doi":"","title":"Availability of Family-Friendly Work Practices and Implicit Wage Costs: New Evidence from Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family-friendly; Earnings; Wage; Labour economics; Business; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Marketing; Economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.05643928832472659,"score_gpt":0.35244788393712617,"score_spread":0.29600859561239956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121505579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.958257,0.0076129176,0.0003557325,0.002000176,0.000035490586,0.000056992532,0.023006687,0.000017748143,0.008657167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878312,0.003445341,0.00029638305,0.0001952981,0.000013661225,0.000019427,0.006530715,0.000008793171,0.0016592717],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979042,0.00018467478,0.00013214849,0.0002851284,0.0008987879,0.0005951048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98518187,0.0029193382,0.0046575316,0.0006097164,0.004896241,0.0017353557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001809688,0.00040582247,0.00068872655,0.0032698107,0.003149639,0.0024189015,0.0017356302,0.00058808643,0.0039845477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008692406,0.00038321962,0.00065755396,0.011510862,0.0012257536,0.0007624715,0.0014293548,0.0011766965,0.00022353357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000149354,0.00006573028,0.9715845,0.0002559132,0.00019423469,0.00016983705,0.002907456,0.0005043956,0.00007764665,0.0012693413,0.0056473874,0.017174246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012380385,0.000011346002,0.9940737,0.00014042862,0.000058182042,0.000029231644,0.0018970226,0.00035933376,0.000040831415,0.00008279776,0.003276539,0.000018349481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99892443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038289342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038289342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042639144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27780992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121565934","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.877905","title":"The Long-Term Effects of a Generous Income Support Program: Unemployment Insurance in New Brunswick and Maine, 1940-1991","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Unemployment; Economics; Income Support; Actuarial science; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.006055683132541431,"score_gpt":0.2583061331160297,"score_spread":0.2522504499834882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121565934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944094,0.0018148404,0.000024573645,0.0010622018,0.000026493195,0.000009794728,0.001538204,0.0000031197253,0.0011114784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99483335,0.0010987949,0.000026175228,0.00014215145,0.000020516623,0.000013209439,0.0012752105,0.0000026894945,0.002587821],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994375,0.00007248483,0.000042870142,0.00005250436,0.000055422614,0.00033922115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982145,0.00019048211,0.0006353771,0.000055583263,0.0002793033,0.000624904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071774685,0.00022037742,0.00033490156,0.0016338084,0.0010425638,0.0011833558,0.0014287287,0.00081125426,0.0022252875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00238966,0.00020341417,0.00041637282,0.002836434,0.0012408461,0.0008012169,0.0019677316,0.0011057088,0.0002838904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000489148,0.00016797571,0.98305476,0.000068416666,0.00011275334,0.00043783558,0.003695834,0.00022594423,0.00049752573,0.000865416,0.0013019656,0.009082362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011257061,0.000042619933,0.9947184,0.00003782231,0.000041808464,0.000034011508,0.0028671608,0.00005810933,0.00011236656,0.00003920125,0.0020304902,0.000006950489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8176644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9527959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18233562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010253769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007891768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36681885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121609190","doi":"","title":"Are Two Carrots Better Than One? The Effects of Adding Employment Services to Financial Incentive Programs for Welfare Recipients","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Earnings; Incentive; Welfare; Labour economics; Poverty; Business; Wage; Economics; Social Welfare; Finance; Economic growth; Accounting","score_opus":0.0350083157066833,"score_gpt":0.3431030730931899,"score_spread":0.3080947573865066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121609190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94228685,0.0037355751,0.0014749792,0.022714682,0.0012944654,0.00096374686,0.00045059572,0.00009028258,0.0269888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766133,0.0018454895,0.0044372017,0.007956299,0.00028474955,0.00085279776,0.00011504593,0.000043438984,0.007851634],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916467,0.0057066954,0.0002286856,0.00066012243,0.0009333456,0.00082449545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814107,0.011629102,0.002528982,0.0012708507,0.00090238504,0.002258058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009073068,0.0006749093,0.0013902428,0.00066893373,0.002604119,0.002244452,0.0016238141,0.0034142684,0.021065751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034727238,0.000548463,0.0011298987,0.0008151862,0.004148471,0.0033439908,0.002162253,0.0023750486,0.000901778],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.22202612,0.048784874,0.05797606,0.004943935,0.0033234993,0.0009879476,0.018090459,0.0032414584,0.018643688,0.08530907,0.021252599,0.5154203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.08828597,0.17626637,0.28412014,0.0063295364,0.012041616,0.0005572861,0.0623366,0.0063823136,0.019964244,0.1730681,0.16933468,0.0013131298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026133686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034585267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026133686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030432194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005738076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07047194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121609699","doi":"10.1353/jhr.2010.0007","title":"Evidence from Maternity Leave Expansions of the Impact of Maternal Care on Early Child Development","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Human Resources","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of California, Davis; McMaster University","keywords":"Maternity leave; Child care; Maternity care; Child development; Psychology; Medicine; Developmental psychology; Nursing; Health care; Economics; Economic growth; Sick leave","score_opus":0.029502455631711506,"score_gpt":0.3026050062275276,"score_spread":0.2731025505958161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121609699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98987424,0.0022212784,0.00007481017,0.0009730504,0.000008053865,0.000008954351,0.0007544924,0.000004900262,0.006080278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976826,0.0010732127,0.00005727935,0.00011227123,0.000010823126,0.0000050864937,0.00033306482,0.000001984535,0.0007237019],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726427,0.00051346625,0.00007184408,0.0002553802,0.001092782,0.0008022766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875031,0.004118213,0.0035372828,0.00088467123,0.0024049242,0.0015518137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022731663,0.00022661127,0.00037602586,0.0010617317,0.0017397212,0.000935348,0.0010495676,0.00043532715,0.003502375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0123535525,0.00019516863,0.00042830847,0.0022484097,0.0014816794,0.0003952101,0.0015298328,0.00072570005,0.00013671775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009921124,0.00009264254,0.9517086,0.0001339472,0.00022628426,0.0003631952,0.0039745197,0.0005347546,0.00060894096,0.0011079125,0.0010815214,0.039175544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048069423,0.000042979427,0.99806184,0.000025172456,0.00002936765,0.000028554477,0.00056259875,0.000046547513,0.000055558176,0.000028834556,0.0011094434,0.000004248452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88929033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93267286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88929033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010140238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010330244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22272325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121620220","doi":"","title":"Taxation Reforms: a CGE-Microsimulation Analysis for Pakistan","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Agency for International Development; International Development Research Centre; Government of Canada; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Tax reform; Value-added tax; Indirect tax; Economics; Sales tax; Ad valorem tax; Computable general equilibrium; Tax rate; Tax credit; Public economics; Direct tax; Revenue; Tax revenue; Investment (military); Monetary economics; Macroeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.03999722035590099,"score_gpt":0.3763063202478084,"score_spread":0.33630909989190744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121620220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9500766,0.00046664383,0.021752559,0.0013742403,0.00007272916,0.0001266374,0.001725486,0.00014180175,0.024263412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938578,0.00020250288,0.002911952,0.000086056665,0.000014449107,0.00005653937,0.0004988095,0.00001825941,0.00235363],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999816,0.000064431544,0.0000057816214,0.000025091978,0.000018569774,0.00007012639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774784,0.0016256063,0.00019104511,0.00007728555,0.00023672484,0.00012149682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093647686,0.00042818498,0.000839986,0.00047088318,0.000672373,0.00088916667,0.00063234085,0.001112682,0.006289804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032408426,0.00025743464,0.00086704234,0.0005664382,0.00059642625,0.0005701719,0.00084263633,0.0012769878,0.00021662128],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059569014,0.00006102675,0.004291046,0.000029358655,0.000033791348,0.0001234832,0.000036902966,0.9867143,0.0001106337,0.006218044,0.00074716576,0.0015746038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004314511,0.000054659457,0.0019369454,0.000006814267,0.000030211853,0.000011333531,0.00013744387,0.99536836,0.000075656346,0.0018285977,0.000497663,0.00000926083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08876829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0409858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08876829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016415891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001564166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17650324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121678854","doi":"10.3386/w23380","title":"How do the U.S and Canadian Social Safety Nets Compare for Women and Children?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.23405490553550082,"score_gpt":0.47329033614826405,"score_spread":0.23923543061276323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121678854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46524894,0.07346472,0.00070981437,0.1513,0.0022173335,0.0002568623,0.053438235,0.00013939873,0.2532247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9453622,0.023960467,0.00066328264,0.0065202178,0.00033527726,0.00011953927,0.012010743,0.00009943733,0.010928962],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99147344,0.00059921015,0.00026827204,0.00057493243,0.0039856834,0.0030984618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855187,0.0008870737,0.0013199819,0.00031498837,0.008894401,0.0030647619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005291916,0.00055039383,0.0009665508,0.009654994,0.007404388,0.0057750996,0.002719459,0.0011305318,0.006991132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024469053,0.00035593065,0.0014187545,0.018461859,0.002726481,0.002846493,0.003190452,0.0018742016,0.000701005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024721888,0.00007534316,0.6811663,0.0005276463,0.00047523208,0.00018864615,0.015434617,0.0005594195,0.00011131249,0.022545619,0.11922649,0.15944222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017083414,0.000029155692,0.9090972,0.00067760673,0.0001382408,0.000050573442,0.021683965,0.0001582202,0.00011187557,0.0011031348,0.066866025,0.00006685525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08693941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08693941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09043986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6307925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121699408","doi":"","title":"Suicide and Property Rights in India","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Università Bocconi; International Fine Particle Research Institute; Maryland Population Research Center, University of Maryland; World Bank Group","keywords":"Download; Property rights; Wife; Developing country; State (computer science); Demographic economics; Domestic violence; Property (philosophy); Political science; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Economics; Economic growth; Medicine; Law; Environmental health","score_opus":0.027108190982920097,"score_gpt":0.31126311141646695,"score_spread":0.28415492043354684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121699408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98799396,0.0009306519,0.00017649717,0.00094028324,0.000016740345,0.000006306769,0.00022135847,0.0000074865393,0.009706832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940395,0.00019225196,0.000017974184,0.000023896027,0.0000064974884,0.000001125101,0.000035417157,8.949775e-7,0.0003180172],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917054,0.00028151373,0.000049320643,0.00006933127,0.0001612649,0.0002680966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947007,0.0016264278,0.0025443006,0.0003291507,0.00028434375,0.0005151526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004787634,0.000118447504,0.0001937999,0.0013375016,0.00062508153,0.0013429956,0.0004545459,0.00031676833,0.003786202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034866682,0.0001282205,0.0003866365,0.0015709281,0.0016087589,0.00061116787,0.001404439,0.00083199586,0.00022669078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011765468,0.00017735618,0.9500766,0.000073725205,0.00012504346,0.0008845637,0.0035214536,0.0024259118,0.00027013817,0.015987415,0.0014369845,0.024903167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052862206,0.000057442296,0.9899164,0.000044476015,0.000026671018,0.0006116293,0.0033778378,0.00091211055,0.00012312166,0.0024479583,0.0024602946,0.000016716054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024881905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02213127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024881905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013919802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079319224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04947412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121717559","doi":"","title":"Assessing the Impact of a Wage Subsidy for Single Parents on Social Assistance","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Endogeneity; Duration (music); Economics; Wage; Government (linguistics); Population; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Social assistance; Current Population Survey; Econometrics; Demography; Economic growth","score_opus":0.10269813595338448,"score_gpt":0.4261523821821594,"score_spread":0.32345424622877494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121717559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98892015,0.0006281293,0.00088034786,0.0018063048,0.00006874564,0.00030059236,0.0016783533,0.000021837059,0.0056956387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99476874,0.00023959465,0.00041742675,0.00018258506,0.000020965219,0.00021003031,0.00039817617,0.0000040390764,0.0037584912],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941195,0.0030784328,0.00020646736,0.0004253722,0.00073885446,0.0014313511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98494047,0.008439816,0.0030987675,0.00051464007,0.001383343,0.0016229245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058230865,0.0005247176,0.00080441235,0.0009549082,0.0011653679,0.0016144357,0.0015974978,0.0016409727,0.008055336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022446232,0.0003325285,0.0011799757,0.0014041101,0.0010153953,0.0008895967,0.0019340364,0.0023008457,0.00043714288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0063702324,0.004688931,0.8288115,0.0009266932,0.0013996961,0.001115619,0.0034225206,0.035407938,0.00074506324,0.016459355,0.0073765204,0.093275905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006425685,0.004363944,0.9571501,0.00039658972,0.00088886544,0.00007989687,0.0045730947,0.021120058,0.00053879,0.002442869,0.0077652247,0.000037917634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47053528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5222484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47053528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012086065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015446516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9355929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121782190","doi":"","title":"Marriage Market, Divorce Legislation and Household Labor Supply","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Legislation; Economics; Position (finance); Labour economics; Identification (biology); Affect (linguistics); Distribution (mathematics); Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.03043814424808894,"score_gpt":0.3006066288521146,"score_spread":0.27016848460402565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121782190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855236,0.0012761394,0.0017682121,0.0007700492,0.000009474464,0.000022984064,0.0004514278,0.000011677318,0.010166424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950421,0.0006548571,0.00021063951,0.00003828911,0.0000146483135,0.000013263568,0.00016514219,0.0000038706303,0.0038572585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996333,0.00011760239,0.000022329155,0.000044841374,0.00008685037,0.00009501778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997189,0.0013763771,0.0009810367,0.00009774258,0.0001434252,0.00021237318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007832551,0.00012516111,0.00038114892,0.001004027,0.0006072362,0.0011668669,0.0004198832,0.0003359884,0.018343886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042674113,0.00019015225,0.00029620892,0.0012188089,0.0005643285,0.0008216297,0.0010104433,0.00047426127,0.00066339667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044341158,0.0003222656,0.84998333,0.00022833601,0.00018903075,0.0005716275,0.0027728465,0.018013267,0.001201297,0.057959788,0.0015188897,0.06679593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041528194,0.0002770058,0.9515714,0.00012681681,0.000064110136,0.00016856751,0.005736753,0.013948223,0.00066579774,0.015680972,0.011695231,0.00002351529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021592107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029897885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021592107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016025656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011351936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06136644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121832781","doi":"","title":"When Can Experimental Evidence Mislead? A Re-Assessment of Canada's Self Sufficiency Project","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Incentive; Welfare; Workforce; Work (physics); Economics; Public economics; Impact evaluation; Control (management); Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.05773531003526097,"score_gpt":0.3764997666178109,"score_spread":0.3187644565825499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121832781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1607391,0.0669839,0.08258406,0.5642346,0.0144162085,0.009205822,0.0045480295,0.0007825605,0.09650576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7930292,0.012656674,0.073811136,0.099807955,0.002055979,0.0070456993,0.00094062113,0.0004533584,0.010199334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.5519694,0.3414855,0.016614754,0.013721199,0.07162633,0.0045828363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.16752444,0.6113714,0.024595771,0.08256923,0.1101103,0.0038288513],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.49452153,0.0017498637,0.0037112653,0.004170365,0.0056542084,0.008228055,0.009711008,0.0072368425,0.0062366356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6879797,0.0010316746,0.0025892227,0.0042710034,0.024997717,0.008987458,0.0067220945,0.00777969,0.00083917764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016092068,0.002093734,0.037494946,0.015584485,0.008474596,0.0015093485,0.019104302,0.007722517,0.0046059103,0.38373587,0.14278801,0.36079422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009009498,0.005512517,0.08053576,0.033865448,0.009981079,0.00050660694,0.016180586,0.016697032,0.019068964,0.34259653,0.46452028,0.0015258495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2832123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2501482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7167877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038043294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05035026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62334496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121909291","doi":"","title":"On the Equivalence of Common Approaches to Cross Sectional Weights in Household Panel Surveys","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Econometrics; Sampling (signal processing); British Household Panel Survey; Cross-sectional study; Statistics; Equivalence (formal languages); Sampling design; Mathematics; Computer science; Medicine; Environmental health; Population","score_opus":0.24220437923559424,"score_gpt":0.35770754132603266,"score_spread":0.11550316209043843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121909291","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029826881,0.00035769102,0.9947009,0.00047294667,0.000058264963,0.00010703626,0.00014426891,0.00006998741,0.0011061425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16971348,0.002327832,0.82145786,0.00085354445,0.0004771418,0.0019937453,0.0008438305,0.00025835165,0.002074225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8725682,0.10847659,0.0034196319,0.0067343735,0.007859384,0.00094181957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.770193,0.17525513,0.008919078,0.03800575,0.006920325,0.00070672826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10114978,0.0020164934,0.0021589776,0.004450302,0.0015803266,0.0047698976,0.005838433,0.0039188885,0.0054128678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.327293,0.001653147,0.002397325,0.008760683,0.0056522093,0.01111678,0.0090938285,0.0064744703,0.0012933366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006596347,0.00006956176,0.0043146433,0.00022855129,0.0003279591,0.00006662255,0.0010500598,0.02573382,0.00022690119,0.8668851,0.0024031664,0.09862766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038868933,0.00006368722,0.0017854489,0.00020647928,0.00008379531,0.00011034515,0.00022641635,0.09861386,0.0005027954,0.89088464,0.0074269446,0.000056693443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003173618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025415388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10114978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002537454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016747916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53493756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121914675","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2906421","title":"A Marriage Matching Function with Flexible Spillover and Substitution Patterns","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Substitution (logic); Spillover effect; Function (biology); Matching (statistics); Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Statistics; Evolutionary biology; Biology","score_opus":0.012512046745954991,"score_gpt":0.261377814294311,"score_spread":0.24886576754835601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121914675","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29254115,0.0005035495,0.6847637,0.002363514,0.00011049348,0.00035294573,0.00073628995,0.0007972543,0.017831055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90866953,0.0006685622,0.0515586,0.00036115892,0.00019545128,0.00037905408,0.00033759873,0.00016124846,0.037668806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973916,0.0014889354,0.00008970621,0.00042247173,0.00015986463,0.00044741476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906533,0.0057726093,0.0007790016,0.0014868195,0.00059635186,0.0007119749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069363588,0.0010985662,0.0042093373,0.002382644,0.0018472774,0.0029304898,0.0039532436,0.0051544956,0.020277565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021368245,0.0011938108,0.0026029004,0.0033515764,0.0034987004,0.0062728142,0.0029811135,0.0023677025,0.0030567904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007404998,0.0007051997,0.008788812,0.00034875295,0.00027582276,0.0008068717,0.00073904084,0.12567131,0.0041576205,0.7630299,0.008965403,0.085770644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033427222,0.00032815756,0.0037039185,0.00006883787,0.0002229155,0.00056039594,0.0004627177,0.5931339,0.0008715422,0.39722177,0.0029917285,0.00009971733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034050825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022104122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020277565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018296682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019021898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06783521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121992013","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1676024","title":"Politico Economic Consequences of Rising Wage Inequality","year":2010,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Economics; Economic inequality; Wage inequality; Wage; Labour economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01690234688227941,"score_gpt":0.28921943085366725,"score_spread":0.2723170839713878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121992013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7477582,0.0010904678,0.00066443643,0.046927545,0.0002679682,0.000009948736,0.0003256208,0.000016292859,0.20293948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99520504,0.00028718493,0.000042582957,0.0006967761,0.00009703189,0.00000358494,0.000026918326,0.000004983143,0.0036358878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920124,0.00026152204,0.00001704203,0.0000463872,0.00010451284,0.0003693344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990447,0.00030124918,0.00020365663,0.000042340023,0.000093654664,0.00031440874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006620914,0.00006242166,0.00016113934,0.0008281625,0.0016550629,0.0022985383,0.00017298921,0.0009542629,0.016896289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00241447,0.00008978741,0.00013188017,0.0010236246,0.0020381187,0.00074277393,0.001221642,0.0011630645,0.0007237107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007568856,0.0004441389,0.14255837,0.00008289495,0.000051548654,0.0024982765,0.008044867,0.0015550024,0.0030525697,0.7468196,0.023463864,0.07067191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013764079,0.00016279709,0.5333391,0.00013291725,0.000052918447,0.0010817185,0.04847346,0.0022421745,0.0007443006,0.3144666,0.099128105,0.000038202917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057137907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011569453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016896289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011150568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089063565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05652368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122001626","doi":"","title":"National Data Sets: Sources of Information for Canadian Child Care Data","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Child care; Health care; Survey data collection; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Business","score_opus":0.13231801194989126,"score_gpt":0.4139857164589235,"score_spread":0.2816677045090322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122001626","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002476584,0.001167501,0.0011519463,0.00054714055,0.000087178865,0.0006945386,0.9814038,0.00027291177,0.0121984705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017979177,0.0028606094,0.014824421,0.00037911138,0.000040406434,0.002297443,0.9567347,0.00022088269,0.004663212],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98423856,0.0013692969,0.0020406607,0.0009965214,0.009668828,0.0016862318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9324589,0.005640733,0.0035879717,0.0036882323,0.052146576,0.0024776596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010234546,0.0014833022,0.0015827797,0.03530875,0.005194555,0.004227344,0.003859215,0.0009400688,0.01941438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05887455,0.0011820743,0.0016405438,0.09025706,0.00059667195,0.0012442968,0.0030845073,0.0015388223,0.005084635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002535362,0.00008220682,0.05535225,0.0049789157,0.000435455,0.00022840474,0.0017451023,0.0018396234,0.0003670128,0.0097225215,0.8219194,0.10307552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100856145,0.000021080481,0.21324083,0.0022874116,0.00027714617,0.00010349513,0.001778173,0.0010439069,0.0006243698,0.0011284382,0.7791866,0.00020765806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99211395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9919748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06627793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06627793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16407178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4808823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122037682","doi":"","title":"The Role of Law in Public Health: The Case of Family Planning in the Philippines","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Family planning; Government (linguistics); Health law; Politics; Family law; Business; Order (exchange); Public health; Public policy; Law; Service delivery framework; Service (business); Public administration; Economic growth; Political science; Health policy; Health care; Population; Economics; Medicine; Environmental health; International health; Research methodology; Nursing; Marketing; Finance","score_opus":0.025926078311617903,"score_gpt":0.299426589526283,"score_spread":0.27350051121466507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122037682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6382174,0.0070161,0.0025749805,0.21010359,0.00021893824,0.00019332007,0.00005061243,0.000031805088,0.14159326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99111104,0.0015622437,0.00039303367,0.0043198923,0.00006662995,0.000058654656,0.0000062416093,0.000009154059,0.0024732563],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.983198,0.012367043,0.00014426596,0.00037263086,0.0006490532,0.0032689588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97945124,0.015131226,0.0018144202,0.0004825599,0.001267896,0.0018526978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014183076,0.000375046,0.00046418628,0.0016384334,0.02637709,0.008921602,0.0024688577,0.006701012,0.004052182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018069876,0.0005749305,0.0005130581,0.0028065532,0.035596613,0.006078052,0.009297706,0.00735499,0.00015150524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003602719,0.0001452526,0.01279943,0.00022963995,0.00002212352,0.019096028,0.633917,0.0008649256,0.00023935478,0.31461096,0.004758153,0.013281147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048465776,0.00010864564,0.011767193,0.00072728755,0.00005346765,0.0023148614,0.83910364,0.0016244409,0.00045719242,0.036408678,0.10731622,0.00006980043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1438159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.124911845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1438159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022470718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023468591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28595763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122104905","doi":"","title":"Low-fee ($5/day/child) Regulated Childcare Policy and the Labor Supply of Mothers with Young Children: A Natural Experiment from Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Subsidy; Natural experiment; Christian ministry; Demographic economics; Government (linguistics); Labour supply; Business; Socioeconomics; Demography; Geography; Economics; Labour economics; Political science; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.007105381705656488,"score_gpt":0.26565321866360664,"score_spread":0.25854783695795014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122104905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942569,0.0001674275,0.00006541453,0.00043680033,0.000009117188,0.00017632103,0.00094449834,0.000004621587,0.0039388193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875432,0.0005252342,0.00042280823,0.00033007568,0.000010899122,0.00029307074,0.00091714185,0.000008530679,0.009948951],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763954,0.0006751463,0.000057164245,0.00022303597,0.000456166,0.0009488964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99534094,0.0014221645,0.00060166686,0.00022922298,0.0012706179,0.0011352723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002416329,0.00043594753,0.0006241552,0.00089685724,0.006435163,0.0022500793,0.0016284628,0.0009753807,0.0055862786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047392044,0.00049731205,0.0006401638,0.002154323,0.0022934373,0.00057296694,0.001093782,0.001215451,0.00043208993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005953142,0.010688003,0.8512651,0.00038823523,0.0003665044,0.0013077579,0.051406592,0.00378147,0.0032421383,0.009900882,0.016061915,0.045638252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012872667,0.0025208062,0.88413477,0.00023085122,0.0002405503,0.00010827242,0.08064103,0.0036032943,0.0008908146,0.0009801857,0.025210552,0.00015160454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99454135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06447781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06447781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.102430716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46782142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122107157","doi":"","title":"Keeping in Touch – A Benefit of Public Holidays","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"German; Social benefits; Business; Leisure time; Advertising; Demographic economics; Economics; Geography; Physical activity","score_opus":0.031095819333201966,"score_gpt":0.2723820977213241,"score_spread":0.24128627838812214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122107157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9370034,0.0006975539,0.0005810231,0.002325681,0.00005579755,0.0000133376525,0.00024292564,0.000026491365,0.059053876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972512,0.00011443608,0.000096722346,0.00007203626,0.000016248623,0.000002691266,0.00003261966,0.000005191688,0.0024087443],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994086,0.00018915349,0.000017925293,0.00005984724,0.000073685216,0.00025093803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978496,0.0005343426,0.0006372769,0.00026465187,0.00015917419,0.0005550712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054153963,0.00012603743,0.00023284949,0.00031556535,0.0014370873,0.0012811286,0.00035676276,0.00057843287,0.021018106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00265974,0.00012866792,0.00029541954,0.00040984145,0.0009694771,0.0012431608,0.0016157988,0.0005528817,0.0007933895],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024462887,0.0012767968,0.52556145,0.00077939505,0.00045040564,0.0034172263,0.05910225,0.0013497443,0.011120973,0.06380453,0.02648691,0.30420408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049491762,0.00038086722,0.85959077,0.00014267968,0.00010044592,0.00093778037,0.05732735,0.0002805009,0.001120215,0.008248733,0.07178783,0.000033411303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034123831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007504246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021018106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069054606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040863402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07031262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122192337","doi":"","title":"Closing the Gender Gap in Corporate Advancement: Insights and Solutions from Behavioural Economics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Public relations; Scholarship; Incentive; Political science; Bounded rationality; Marketing; Economics; Business; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.056480691014318164,"score_gpt":0.27545515351634164,"score_spread":0.2189744625020235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122192337","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13570298,0.060140382,0.07175553,0.51798445,0.0026763033,0.00017107207,0.00071986817,0.00005685528,0.21079254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.935049,0.02545233,0.009168174,0.01768945,0.0014945735,0.000245723,0.00012971385,0.0000477522,0.010723353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99454015,0.0039041813,0.00015707967,0.00039055463,0.00055058417,0.00045745738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95154655,0.042027768,0.0021565398,0.000893086,0.0022090646,0.0011669174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0117310155,0.0005348017,0.0009147131,0.0025849014,0.002488874,0.0055155503,0.0013113206,0.0027482952,0.008664994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020367593,0.00033433086,0.00071941747,0.0025228302,0.01218451,0.006103168,0.00423455,0.0036689064,0.0004888519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035139463,0.00012607516,0.007877145,0.00042494814,0.00003780697,0.00023840794,0.00940964,0.001187751,0.000076616125,0.94854313,0.0060175215,0.026025888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013426943,0.000034445064,0.008493434,0.0012455039,0.000019791913,0.000092593,0.020910406,0.0020639652,0.00008061245,0.9277262,0.039293643,0.00002600784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007535581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068146447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0117310155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005369529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005104945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06204027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122218336","doi":"10.5282/ubm/epub.17196","title":"Affirmative Action: One Size Does Not Fit All","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pennsylvania State University; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; York University; Yale University","keywords":"Counterintuitive; Download; Disadvantaged; Welfare; Developing country; Rationing; Subsidy; Economics; Work (physics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Affirmative action; Action (physics); Public economics; Microeconomics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.06618158019091601,"score_gpt":0.35003975910539903,"score_spread":0.283858178914483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122218336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06371494,0.0034492125,0.11900547,0.23312952,0.0029572386,0.0002698053,0.00039104957,0.00041434565,0.5766685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9219134,0.0011052254,0.014615659,0.022723863,0.0009255043,0.00032905498,0.00006154329,0.00019976454,0.038125943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99389416,0.0026376792,0.00017562228,0.0012505,0.0012252657,0.00081688346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98544425,0.007053389,0.0014609623,0.0031140726,0.0013037507,0.0016237072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0084272185,0.0006182221,0.0016095602,0.00064115634,0.003935166,0.0047978438,0.001900816,0.0063755396,0.034173194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02665314,0.000276951,0.0012000976,0.00045633438,0.012363179,0.010281457,0.005225881,0.004909523,0.0038622166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052493317,0.000043103915,0.0008579074,0.000077901335,0.000038326667,0.00011246178,0.001005217,0.00048380744,0.00026174568,0.97179925,0.00654144,0.018726371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042063355,0.00004104717,0.000281844,0.00008032584,0.000023705921,0.00012661712,0.00067997223,0.0014213384,0.000093560186,0.9680614,0.029133972,0.000014187686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020969573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002217776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034173194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023298685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032386081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114320695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122229510","doi":"10.1111/iere.12395","title":"FERTILITY SHOCKS AND EQUILIBRIUM MARRIAGE‐RATE DYNAMICS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Fertility; Matching (statistics); Economics; Demographic economics; Sex ratio; Marital status; Affect (linguistics); Demography; Econometrics; Psychology; Statistics; Sociology; Mathematics; Population","score_opus":0.022051082899921488,"score_gpt":0.300613739874113,"score_spread":0.2785626569741915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122229510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863528,0.00048424245,0.004906146,0.0011879487,0.000017744029,0.00001873112,0.0011904215,0.00006280146,0.005779124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972351,0.00022593678,0.00020912122,0.00003598732,0.000006917292,0.000007224455,0.00026429704,0.000005660285,0.0020097669],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982244,0.00006652976,0.000005705882,0.00003196197,0.000013819623,0.000059529277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994129,0.00024530644,0.00015538308,0.000049788323,0.00007285208,0.00006392198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092362356,0.00013879764,0.00042625095,0.000611451,0.0003619898,0.0012673875,0.00036733787,0.0007902868,0.007450883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029177803,0.00020871048,0.000408998,0.00049016305,0.0004277303,0.0005911647,0.00040513,0.0004923109,0.00071472314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039548887,0.0002050887,0.3119173,0.00014115793,0.00025601248,0.00068404124,0.0011380449,0.34066597,0.0045732204,0.28530592,0.010532968,0.0441848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081623235,0.00023351373,0.46545598,0.000071129114,0.00006626676,0.00038396486,0.0013941987,0.4257399,0.0008881429,0.091210015,0.014379661,0.00009552684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023591088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011463198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023591088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014186118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047300613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046907544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122270507","doi":"","title":"Estimation of Collective Household Models With Engel Curves","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engel curve; Econometrics; Equivalence (formal languages); Economics; Estimation; Nonlinear system; Scale (ratio); Contrast (vision); Resource (disambiguation); Microeconomics; Mathematics; Computer science; Price index; Geography","score_opus":0.07047610363417732,"score_gpt":0.3255542210000773,"score_spread":0.25507811736589997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122270507","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24352315,0.0005448183,0.74542207,0.0008647144,0.00004485399,0.00010031877,0.00088721304,0.00031006892,0.008302862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93304956,0.00049092603,0.057471313,0.00007788057,0.000039256236,0.0002177667,0.0009828905,0.00007962882,0.0075907935],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981989,0.0010619682,0.000075339296,0.00029279658,0.0002081691,0.00016293352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934462,0.004141669,0.00091367355,0.0009720348,0.0003439371,0.00018252186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004860057,0.00073018565,0.0014773901,0.001111322,0.0003993273,0.0019300267,0.0017366185,0.001355909,0.0044209403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01943514,0.0006762358,0.0013935036,0.0015832062,0.0013170299,0.0020274327,0.0018902789,0.0014888041,0.00069521356],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053298678,0.000045421955,0.011683293,0.00010218819,0.00015687583,0.00013384942,0.00061987696,0.72710115,0.00023505537,0.23558664,0.002368253,0.021914063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016648863,0.000014302834,0.0017126238,0.00001919215,0.000014893077,0.000021732896,0.00015699897,0.8550945,0.00010738151,0.14126581,0.0015561655,0.0000197555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015515915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00786887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015515915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001495812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000878622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030851245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122287852","doi":"","title":"Assessing the Impact of Taxes on Female Labor Supply Using a Finite Mixture Approach","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Monte Carlo method; Schedule; Substitution (logic); Preference; Tax revenue; Substitution effect; Labour supply; Econometrics; Revenue; Reduction (mathematics); Microeconomics; Mathematics; Computer science; Public economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.023145129385772685,"score_gpt":0.3258637025103183,"score_spread":0.30271857312454564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122287852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.911651,0.00018236224,0.086142674,0.00021651882,0.000014518616,0.000046965193,0.00014006022,0.00005524097,0.0015506143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99076205,0.000094838506,0.007951799,0.00002214343,0.000009212269,0.000035561425,0.00012179666,0.0000119881215,0.0009905162],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858236,0.0009646509,0.0000387249,0.00015542313,0.00015039022,0.000108541026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900321,0.008541525,0.0005520614,0.00049486116,0.00023221738,0.00014718887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042607305,0.0005229603,0.0010095696,0.0009851594,0.00045719693,0.0010802627,0.0007889002,0.0010102941,0.0042154198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015963398,0.00054357096,0.0013506106,0.00072377484,0.0006326148,0.0012706461,0.0011813949,0.00085769716,0.00037318107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014377177,0.0003406802,0.09187677,0.00010008369,0.0005760364,0.00032918018,0.00051219325,0.81274575,0.003496754,0.041883107,0.0005173871,0.04618433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004223247,0.00029479037,0.02545441,0.000013677352,0.00013490785,0.000087254215,0.00021848729,0.9535252,0.0012081899,0.018356798,0.0006222551,0.000041953237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009367175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054382253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009367175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011438375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005991097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022533178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122299953","doi":"","title":"New Reform Strategies and Welfare Participation in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Sanctions; Work (physics); Demographics; Welfare reform; Economics; Demographic economics; Percentage point; Public economics; Point (geometry); Labour economics; Political science; Market economy; Demography; Finance","score_opus":0.03470258059964492,"score_gpt":0.33428940852689676,"score_spread":0.29958682792725183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122299953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785308,0.0006800798,0.00050077285,0.0023720744,0.000017582612,0.00005880023,0.002625469,0.000023591472,0.015190812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947686,0.00024940693,0.0002713578,0.00013297948,0.000004776373,0.000013217666,0.00064976694,0.000003732095,0.0039062125],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997979,0.00021163913,0.000044034125,0.00015753445,0.000673261,0.00093459565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971265,0.00023527851,0.00055839145,0.00011696096,0.001405638,0.0005572004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014994257,0.00021958584,0.00026553014,0.0010951431,0.0029521286,0.0014348925,0.0009539442,0.00042858886,0.0034134958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038193278,0.00012857668,0.00035480232,0.0024065387,0.0011942505,0.00035646054,0.0011532233,0.0008044975,0.00015979593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003261801,0.00024823777,0.88716686,0.00014971188,0.00012416973,0.0001378269,0.0068000937,0.0048561776,0.0010360003,0.014039574,0.009296989,0.07581824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022417493,0.000053832446,0.9718374,0.00006311874,0.000033093645,0.00002374944,0.00342926,0.0021193663,0.00053876714,0.0005117231,0.021345453,0.000021806289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99431723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06368478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06368478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06080066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46206754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122326121","doi":"","title":"Increased paid maternitiy leave and children's development measured at age four to five. An empirical analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Lirias (KU Leuven)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Psychology; Matching (statistics); Developmental psychology; Selection bias; Demography; Medicine","score_opus":0.06924922789609607,"score_gpt":0.3055351705830094,"score_spread":0.23628594268691333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122326121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967116,0.0005374673,0.000038887505,0.00009508129,0.000009575754,0.0000058518726,0.0016576796,0.0000049614537,0.0009387812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706846,0.0002855337,0.000067632114,0.00001288483,0.000007896682,0.0000131712895,0.0016867291,0.0000021707594,0.00085555855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991007,0.00018336094,0.00007384061,0.00017269429,0.00020180653,0.0002677309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935516,0.0014397758,0.0029129502,0.00030911053,0.0005059205,0.0012805992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016205759,0.00034730064,0.00036502496,0.0022509089,0.00049487466,0.0007350928,0.00090753543,0.00054352614,0.0041248226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053116484,0.00020093191,0.0011190339,0.0017371543,0.0005521431,0.0004657031,0.0010298907,0.0008395071,0.0004948947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007569913,0.00003816194,0.99738747,0.000013229468,0.00007024634,0.00003738701,0.00022045645,0.00011330055,0.000032731918,0.00007914278,0.0001865372,0.001745599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016552953,0.000030820185,0.99943846,0.00000849999,0.000015948353,0.000014022175,0.00021532884,0.00007081059,0.000025466492,0.000012495487,0.00016456514,0.0000018601635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14960073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16458309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14960073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021786783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013330361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29745996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122349365","doi":"","title":"A Collective Retirement Model : Identification and Estimation in the Presence of Externalities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology","keywords":"Spouse; Earnings; Economics; Externality; Margin (machine learning); Estimation; Social security; Structural estimation; Identification (biology); Panel data; Health and Retirement Study; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Political science; Finance; Sociology","score_opus":0.027364369650484797,"score_gpt":0.2830684505053776,"score_spread":0.2557040808548928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122349365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.658235,0.00058624713,0.32610625,0.0027032874,0.00011690453,0.00017440217,0.001961407,0.0002539168,0.009862645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620598,0.0004205098,0.02209079,0.00016378425,0.00008891354,0.00030739317,0.0011100533,0.000033933797,0.013724903],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994017,0.00026609105,0.000027926782,0.00013153859,0.000060140566,0.00011265544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964462,0.002123797,0.00075013284,0.00025330135,0.00017966227,0.0002470024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032928681,0.00065503584,0.0014236565,0.0007967322,0.00053960225,0.001605612,0.0017966733,0.0022302638,0.004964742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065874346,0.00059797225,0.00087540894,0.0011190947,0.0009261594,0.0011347499,0.0016788976,0.0015120108,0.00063026807],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020979157,0.00021179297,0.02461024,0.000082714905,0.00018479819,0.0003622893,0.00039098895,0.9088513,0.0003132029,0.050320335,0.0023606843,0.012101807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091195805,0.00007612345,0.002346155,0.000016264272,0.000039392904,0.000034831417,0.00012282707,0.9799731,0.000048990303,0.016237268,0.0009995003,0.00001429503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01275717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009089099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01275717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091351196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012262873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02536583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122360623","doi":"","title":"Canadian Evidence on Ten Years of Universal Preschool Policies: the Good and the Bad","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Cognitive development; Child development; Economics; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economic growth; Medicine; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.03125555676322755,"score_gpt":0.31110781379161395,"score_spread":0.2798522570283864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122360623","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27705863,0.35742447,0.001083749,0.11626559,0.001528667,0.00038315667,0.03337981,0.00016833901,0.21270753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89684,0.0753648,0.00078931125,0.010994406,0.0004330098,0.00009167621,0.0045389785,0.000042884425,0.010904947],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822864,0.0028885081,0.0010225744,0.0013188905,0.008316668,0.0041670115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93561333,0.02249785,0.011321023,0.004069461,0.021584956,0.0049134274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015393906,0.00071281305,0.001626333,0.0035212093,0.003612876,0.0042149173,0.0027793362,0.0022624335,0.013288635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046754885,0.00045888554,0.0015482191,0.007344078,0.003304399,0.0015378058,0.0021450254,0.0024074994,0.00038576816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0060856845,0.00065420003,0.25465152,0.012250484,0.0043259244,0.00069969153,0.006756415,0.006210024,0.000695681,0.13711137,0.13645561,0.43410343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007585476,0.00044758536,0.78288907,0.00814528,0.0031612362,0.0000997337,0.0042414884,0.00083333405,0.00086813007,0.005463184,0.19291554,0.00017689037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98721933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92462885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.075371124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11340515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5468583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122366030","doi":"","title":"School Competition and Efficiency with Publicly Funded Catholic Schools","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Productivity; Incentive; Test (biology); Demographic economics; School choice; School system; Economics; Psychology; Mathematics education; Political science; Economic growth; Pedagogy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01216616443227759,"score_gpt":0.24550644260671878,"score_spread":0.2333402781744412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122366030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964324,0.0001058205,0.0001195729,0.00019267772,0.0000015061324,0.0000069669695,0.00011934561,0.000002390802,0.0030192453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992544,0.000019791283,0.000030434463,0.000011749667,0.000002292441,0.000002774171,0.00006780159,0.0000012902693,0.0006093982],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972773,0.00057713594,0.0001100786,0.0003557334,0.00054363377,0.0011361031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98817223,0.003885976,0.0042941147,0.0006199367,0.0007751596,0.002252584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022070643,0.00016562371,0.00065631093,0.0008496471,0.00112433,0.0022582642,0.0006955996,0.0007082168,0.00629642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011153708,0.00021996826,0.0005074244,0.001824257,0.001974818,0.001127912,0.0017861614,0.0005334226,0.00024039269],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000168361,0.00012433284,0.98613304,0.00001913245,0.000058592213,0.00010942145,0.001141867,0.002991308,0.00034390477,0.0035776985,0.0003561888,0.0049761226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026876265,0.00009515197,0.9940348,0.000012422239,0.000013408606,0.000037745096,0.0015832239,0.002143194,0.00013145004,0.0010504982,0.00086355774,0.00000767231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28267547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43121684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28267547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008128287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004537228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56206024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122385177","doi":"","title":"The Gender Pay Gap across Countries: A Human Capital Approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Affect (linguistics); Economics; Human capital; Gender pay gap; Labour economics; Neglect; Demographic economics; Gender gap; Collective bargaining; Work (physics); Economic growth; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.048766918958829314,"score_gpt":0.35582061817568,"score_spread":0.30705369921685066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122385177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9289646,0.006831677,0.01690089,0.0030786968,0.00025364535,0.00023281801,0.004687958,0.0000832296,0.038966496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99455065,0.0008774345,0.0018629442,0.00019192486,0.000068161964,0.00012542344,0.0008441453,0.000010299124,0.001469041],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976814,0.0010798442,0.000088959714,0.000369141,0.00033423252,0.00044647133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957489,0.0026107058,0.0008816911,0.00019321969,0.00025378808,0.00031164262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032602267,0.0004902194,0.0009745447,0.0072912103,0.0008357964,0.0023727212,0.00071202073,0.0007131002,0.008177454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062080165,0.00020821576,0.0015573499,0.007428088,0.0014779156,0.0020473446,0.0033768322,0.0010738197,0.00040045474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018861037,0.00026078222,0.8007385,0.0003162967,0.0015533587,0.0010912387,0.0050404863,0.0076111434,0.00035813573,0.09720713,0.004797247,0.08083703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053238964,0.0005398469,0.91223586,0.00032846155,0.00042186218,0.00051118544,0.011339382,0.012578322,0.00037951992,0.04324325,0.0183039,0.00006518708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009756027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004529967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009756027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010084377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074276794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027356327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122395860","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1071081","title":"An Analysis of Effective Marginal Tax Rates in Quebec","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Microsimulation; Redistribution (election); Population; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Distribution (mathematics); Income tax; Public economics; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.005701767040166683,"score_gpt":0.2893832759908468,"score_spread":0.2836815089506801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122395860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98059076,0.00067875773,0.00071119156,0.0004952872,0.000012755054,0.000035183926,0.004617824,0.000034438053,0.012823803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99407506,0.00015172685,0.00024907762,0.00003285212,0.0000031997938,0.000010561057,0.0009782726,0.000012105865,0.004487076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991003,0.0002458448,0.000027649869,0.00008562023,0.00016809459,0.00037250016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648297,0.0009712799,0.0003084742,0.00013357156,0.0017700582,0.00033358694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011853008,0.00020834287,0.0004295435,0.0017301769,0.0015339515,0.001991411,0.0012119008,0.00039027448,0.00732046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004591448,0.00019840484,0.00055510044,0.0034407238,0.0005298001,0.0005391026,0.0004697252,0.0006445558,0.00026646059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005776801,0.0001644335,0.84814835,0.00008291672,0.00042223994,0.0004900171,0.0017582899,0.060074657,0.00069544197,0.04163468,0.010706455,0.03524485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020361074,0.00004308175,0.95803183,0.00003739386,0.00005646627,0.00004787037,0.001905865,0.031105926,0.00020617092,0.00055657234,0.007956978,0.000031530708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99351805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050428614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050428614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015388365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36588693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122448707","doi":"10.3386/w23920","title":"Reported Effects vs. Revealed-Preference Estimates: Evidence from the propensity to spend tax rebates","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada; Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; University of Chicago","keywords":"Preference; Propensity score matching; Economics; Econometrics; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.536996076142086,"score_gpt":0.5212277288487721,"score_spread":0.01576834729331389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122448707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95394665,0.0018943766,0.030066274,0.0010388969,0.000093190516,0.0002064468,0.0041903034,0.00011041926,0.008453554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920237,0.00046075054,0.0041402946,0.0002720905,0.00006639849,0.00013243055,0.0018794355,0.00003021752,0.0009947686],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9568654,0.031091148,0.003142745,0.0041294736,0.004116562,0.00065468333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4357021,0.4144096,0.08404633,0.056788616,0.0073638577,0.0016894904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054626297,0.00057841913,0.00085912086,0.0017379615,0.00052782695,0.0015711203,0.0016229772,0.0015625138,0.007985566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25588796,0.00064138585,0.0023083074,0.0022768714,0.0021821319,0.0027004788,0.0021618982,0.0026391766,0.0011601561],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00451613,0.0008352635,0.9243833,0.0007839285,0.0051042885,0.00012933272,0.001934647,0.005627771,0.0008775594,0.008020644,0.0015960039,0.046191208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037391606,0.0016721523,0.9597284,0.00029678232,0.0019389502,0.00047599993,0.0010636786,0.01166483,0.003168102,0.015675742,0.003782097,0.00015927131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039890753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00320421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054626297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048267393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039299054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28889495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122461765","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1818735","title":"Does Privatization Deliver? Access to Telephone Services and Household Income in Poor Rural Areas Using a Quasi-Natural Experiment in Peru","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Natural experiment; Rural area; Natural (archaeology); Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Geography; Economics; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.013679076426970799,"score_gpt":0.28530316158072533,"score_spread":0.2716240851537545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122461765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99959296,0.0000096585,0.000050098435,0.00006247904,6.036637e-7,0.000029314495,0.000027812644,0.0000013208712,0.00022586294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948967,0.000018463903,0.00009114717,0.00003732402,0.0000018048843,0.00011113283,0.00003229336,8.487597e-7,0.0002173569],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973801,0.0019275541,0.00004421965,0.00018906576,0.00006551284,0.00039350873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99366635,0.0039884634,0.0012128755,0.0004363981,0.0002176894,0.00047816278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028707832,0.00028278824,0.00056186825,0.00058132986,0.0024583042,0.0009391127,0.000773473,0.0010953257,0.0034437499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073645287,0.00053938397,0.00039391097,0.00084718986,0.0025601438,0.0013211966,0.0016411016,0.0010757231,0.0002576205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005248959,0.024127338,0.89479697,0.00024337925,0.0002976558,0.0012022797,0.052012667,0.0010580365,0.0070696017,0.002289128,0.0007508264,0.010903206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007490339,0.012948646,0.92002416,0.00005969857,0.00020944631,0.0001669143,0.060579296,0.001926285,0.0010478934,0.00089343346,0.0013485348,0.000046541692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03389719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04912062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03389719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011368672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012529232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0673998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122483111","doi":"","title":"Female labour force participation in an era of organizational and technological change","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Economics; Wage; Human capital; Labour economics; Labour supply; Humanities; Political science; Market economy; Art; Economic growth","score_opus":0.02604645584244674,"score_gpt":0.3029127873547098,"score_spread":0.27686633151226303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122483111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854334,0.0010589189,0.00015357329,0.0028814047,0.000022194195,0.000005151491,0.00018414196,0.000003939177,0.010257297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926226,0.0009869479,0.00009126693,0.00024420753,0.000056845704,0.0000074257564,0.000075684016,0.0000024146443,0.005912617],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963176,0.000075159965,0.000013615728,0.000053800635,0.000050654126,0.00017497245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990928,0.00022129952,0.00041695253,0.00003670178,0.000074259005,0.00015798151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006700449,0.00010400753,0.00013969335,0.00077338493,0.0008114297,0.0010567785,0.00026106308,0.00072218536,0.00876618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017391971,0.00011357123,0.00013506577,0.00091911835,0.0010349542,0.0010374276,0.0008287845,0.00043287015,0.00068723684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008279293,0.00018936847,0.73632336,0.0002456401,0.00004999847,0.002776549,0.047835786,0.00085709104,0.0051952912,0.032600112,0.00910305,0.16399589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014740599,0.00009393624,0.9439894,0.00008791834,0.000006771638,0.0005270278,0.011079663,0.00024456606,0.0002491149,0.0019761433,0.041716687,0.000013915133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00966148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01251479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00966148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012855926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005260206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029325783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122551343","doi":"","title":"Are Intra-Household Allocations Policy Neutral? Theory and Empirical Evidence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Alimony; Cohabitation; Beneficiary; Economics; Matching (statistics); Remarriage; Quality (philosophy); Legislature; Demographic economics; Affect (linguistics); Labour economics; Empirical evidence; Spouse; Public economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.16168947778897805,"score_gpt":0.396583597402362,"score_spread":0.23489411961338394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122551343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.659272,0.009876628,0.08032243,0.025504658,0.00035196595,0.00033148803,0.0020135613,0.00033435374,0.22199297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902434,0.002604881,0.0015164481,0.001406584,0.00014004463,0.000057369827,0.0001839655,0.0000275678,0.0038197325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978352,0.0007749947,0.00008096975,0.00042410314,0.00032641456,0.000558294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98112273,0.011462442,0.004317843,0.0016228318,0.0009046687,0.0005694695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071529374,0.00055824843,0.0014692491,0.0009524549,0.0011186891,0.0034290352,0.0019483708,0.0022421512,0.027367145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017610947,0.00038812438,0.000893112,0.0010416559,0.005038773,0.003407891,0.0013906433,0.0023134109,0.0015070947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069451437,0.0004505439,0.04429641,0.00064901466,0.00044932915,0.00039165362,0.00090972276,0.029475296,0.0008295532,0.8146126,0.007376971,0.09986433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003602808,0.00023313178,0.034747202,0.00031650378,0.0003458704,0.00017780287,0.001996448,0.04546786,0.0011723782,0.8896638,0.02544381,0.00007493198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016016299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063546337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027367145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003103393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018608448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0915522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122569911","doi":"","title":"Explaining the MENA Paradox: Rising Educational Attainment, Yet Stagnant Female Labor Force Participation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Educational attainment; Economics; Labour economics; Wage; Private sector; Multinomial logistic regression; Demographic economics; Public sector; Informal sector; Survey data collection; Work (physics); Economic growth; Economy","score_opus":0.06747594399026174,"score_gpt":0.38831205718028616,"score_spread":0.3208361131900244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122569911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9640132,0.0016381057,0.007183003,0.013128099,0.000065515036,0.000020780712,0.0005891674,0.00005939644,0.013302619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824,0.00028285687,0.00033360897,0.00022596544,0.000022952967,0.0000063329467,0.00004647996,0.0000074881264,0.0008343454],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999744,0.00012438394,0.0000088424895,0.000042958396,0.000019441339,0.00006041662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862516,0.00069044967,0.00039932618,0.00007878541,0.00008301044,0.00012340856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015272545,0.00024227996,0.0004050597,0.00073071395,0.0006645819,0.0015154667,0.00055692246,0.000851351,0.0046945564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046478137,0.00014326083,0.00028935695,0.0008688138,0.0011144866,0.0011700618,0.0010782352,0.00065111957,0.00030676613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041068188,0.00025948172,0.5372133,0.00039204172,0.00013986173,0.0027196812,0.007928126,0.059277423,0.0012196415,0.32050413,0.01697046,0.052965146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018720377,0.00022382847,0.3046194,0.00023868057,0.00011292927,0.0007619111,0.018156303,0.20247753,0.0008294542,0.43999317,0.032303017,0.000096586984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020649182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018553749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020649182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010713368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009037976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041058004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122586999","doi":"","title":"Employment And Child-Care Choices In Canada And The United States","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Subsidy; Demographic economics; Wage; Economics; Labour economics; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.006465854063866595,"score_gpt":0.23471928130402786,"score_spread":0.22825342724016126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122586999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926724,0.001304374,0.00007149083,0.00050710386,0.000011676358,0.000011834654,0.0025427572,0.0000062515974,0.0028720102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99479795,0.0010334429,0.00015709762,0.00014219602,0.000005313185,0.000012525552,0.0023835993,0.0000052857217,0.0014625997],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872595,0.000138015,0.0000408128,0.00013532978,0.0003622425,0.00059750694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983997,0.00016919927,0.0002982382,0.000047621594,0.00056475756,0.00052048196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008965514,0.00031229734,0.0006947536,0.0019225002,0.0032731956,0.0017881171,0.0007291058,0.00045820783,0.0027087862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003280171,0.00024441406,0.0006884158,0.0064085196,0.00081929285,0.0005100753,0.0012864021,0.00066733797,0.00024108356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016223206,0.000060296556,0.9743775,0.00004113943,0.00021905015,0.0001877087,0.0036179144,0.0012947887,0.00013252086,0.0015739787,0.0026148453,0.015718037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000126394425,0.000019012416,0.9899913,0.00005991306,0.000045494897,0.00005177562,0.005387478,0.00054901006,0.00007281749,0.00020847296,0.0035782156,0.000023846409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99535877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02480034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02480034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024463853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17993987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122679873","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.968596","title":"Raising Taxes through Equalization","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Equalization (audio); Economics; Computer science; Business; Mathematics; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.029784593990347132,"score_gpt":0.32713210487145333,"score_spread":0.2973475108811062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122679873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15283291,0.0020564478,0.034148812,0.029937217,0.001243415,0.00015037497,0.0003391628,0.000553933,0.7787378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88634986,0.00042284894,0.0024180412,0.0024375618,0.00032295941,0.000041580977,0.000049375245,0.00006244843,0.1078953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874026,0.00027383267,0.000027265885,0.00023586073,0.0002612307,0.00046158463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988838,0.0003242741,0.00013821095,0.00022436334,0.00024022194,0.00018919162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012663141,0.0004052899,0.00062666973,0.001145814,0.002122144,0.0038623929,0.0007631672,0.0023525602,0.030810218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057605305,0.00024538726,0.00044621775,0.00088331936,0.0025244313,0.003967788,0.0027324348,0.0031584546,0.0023022022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102095604,0.00014611165,0.0016585991,0.00003968423,0.000021302114,0.000064338354,0.00022355391,0.0020012695,0.00042762494,0.9439637,0.011978693,0.03937307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008101498,0.00007655998,0.0033711414,0.000105974985,0.000039466267,0.000100527424,0.00040429767,0.0058234464,0.0013826787,0.89125085,0.09732944,0.0000345312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006552245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008544804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030810218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028175253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035848662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10307044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122685639","doi":"","title":"Welfare Reforms and Consumption Among Single Mother Households: Evidence From Canadian Provinces","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Consumption (sociology); Propensity score matching; Difference in differences; Demographic economics; Matching (statistics); Welfare reform; Population; Significant difference; Economics; Work (physics); Demography; Geography; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Medicine; Econometrics","score_opus":0.05340280201983094,"score_gpt":0.31271210162511426,"score_spread":0.2593092996052833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122685639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791027,0.0024966362,0.00010101623,0.0010838793,0.00001903711,0.000043149936,0.008028189,0.000009589555,0.009115952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921772,0.0026658291,0.00011291858,0.00015107798,0.000007795641,0.000018791032,0.0028398072,0.000007391577,0.0020191257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997846,0.00015081988,0.00009932572,0.00022892776,0.00075388944,0.00092105457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922207,0.00061494706,0.0019559497,0.00045799633,0.003767088,0.0009834344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013998895,0.00030958347,0.0008025408,0.002616312,0.0045152805,0.0015951708,0.0013311938,0.00043955728,0.0039944574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00589498,0.00043039257,0.0007966483,0.011443556,0.0012953503,0.00045596113,0.001254294,0.0005728719,0.00028488846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031403362,0.00005303145,0.97535694,0.00015352698,0.00018590961,0.0001912218,0.004540639,0.00032811664,0.00017086173,0.00087874243,0.004171062,0.013656028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000142628705,0.000012978333,0.9940672,0.000054690972,0.000049962808,0.000023079567,0.0025861575,0.00010502625,0.00006345843,0.000036654525,0.0029744925,0.000012031738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99861205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99912256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03986937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03986937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04667067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28927386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122705635","doi":"","title":"Did Canadian welfare reform work? The effects of new reform strategies on social assistance participation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Political science; Demographics; Humanities; Welfare economics; Sociology; Economics; Demography; Law; Art","score_opus":0.022589134963703874,"score_gpt":0.29160792473873626,"score_spread":0.2690187897750324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122705635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90496856,0.003957467,0.00035133434,0.039732598,0.00011149565,0.00019777639,0.0036958398,0.000047280693,0.046937574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98935246,0.0014642589,0.00026107806,0.0015931501,0.000042977204,0.000046411416,0.0006214397,0.000011248414,0.0066070487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99177295,0.001463885,0.00017149048,0.0004785166,0.0020061233,0.0041070944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908655,0.0013304837,0.0013874746,0.00062032824,0.0031113569,0.0026848293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007148465,0.00040331637,0.000562888,0.0013389055,0.0036221468,0.002620804,0.001910346,0.0011990663,0.008633625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015785893,0.00026865926,0.0010071213,0.0035951447,0.0023125305,0.0015350218,0.002339311,0.0011602561,0.00048553402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010646969,0.00039224472,0.7522594,0.00051750836,0.00040186124,0.00021591007,0.012300081,0.0019356222,0.0013228089,0.014663868,0.014388443,0.20053756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038063066,0.00012716277,0.9672431,0.00016908105,0.00010858464,0.00002357031,0.0052822316,0.0003796158,0.0003449224,0.0004365607,0.02581602,0.00003112254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98096263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9892074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0521782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0521782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.086359285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37858117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122708129","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.650242","title":"Consumption Inequality and Intra-Household Allocations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Demographic economics; Mathematics; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.029316836540945274,"score_gpt":0.29185437993448154,"score_spread":0.2625375433935363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122708129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97889346,0.00034442786,0.0010580783,0.00075311825,0.000006622888,0.0000074172262,0.00024333198,0.0000045921806,0.018688949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761236,0.000087039254,0.000072827366,0.00001581064,0.0000062430963,0.000005444448,0.0000520782,0.0000020392415,0.0021461751],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995295,0.00017532751,0.000013340395,0.00005379241,0.000033128883,0.00019495396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982577,0.0009499394,0.00030413605,0.00013405278,0.00012460738,0.0002295829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007518328,0.00016096765,0.0003174525,0.00084003643,0.0008414949,0.0016828721,0.0002954832,0.0005669438,0.016014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003616379,0.00015901285,0.00017066386,0.0015751392,0.0011197878,0.0014526512,0.0012987995,0.00053248653,0.00051935733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015223542,0.00046250064,0.66710997,0.00007796114,0.00020731566,0.0004936823,0.0063076178,0.008159906,0.0011944105,0.2648156,0.0019870396,0.047661632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051535884,0.00014862455,0.8031163,0.00007538522,0.00006710555,0.00017715537,0.012659089,0.007872127,0.00042465562,0.1687454,0.0066368175,0.00002578312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010471349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017326713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012077343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041907362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053572178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122715010","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2230801","title":"For Better or for Worse: The Long-Term Effects of Postwar Reconstruction on Family Formation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Economics; Psychology; Medicine; Keynesian economics; History; Physics","score_opus":0.011436348571614813,"score_gpt":0.26385170324410834,"score_spread":0.25241535467249354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122715010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967135,0.0008217096,0.000028899321,0.0009493012,0.000020371253,0.0000024583987,0.0001344067,0.0000016007424,0.0013279002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868935,0.0002770081,0.000011194065,0.00003472302,0.00001152865,0.0000017978992,0.00007947283,0.000001342844,0.000893437],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962854,0.00010865733,0.000010826257,0.00003392557,0.000023126453,0.00019483891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978527,0.000791728,0.0004767871,0.00010980565,0.00011403301,0.00065494113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011099417,0.00018280899,0.00028615564,0.00039791426,0.0010046173,0.0013112425,0.0004377196,0.0009281483,0.008785252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048595686,0.00014556704,0.00041748828,0.00053147774,0.001237645,0.0011907156,0.0015912525,0.0011443436,0.00042474532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030067982,0.00075771805,0.95706713,0.000044730932,0.00017658406,0.0005540793,0.0039021228,0.0010007297,0.0006118249,0.004597605,0.0011748454,0.027105793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000140174,0.00016321395,0.9921346,0.00002466652,0.000049501163,0.00004686895,0.0053376416,0.00023170625,0.00015460126,0.0008269999,0.0010044653,0.0000117966765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022415344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04813076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022415344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086379296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087023893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04456973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122777388","doi":"","title":"Public- and Private-Sector Wage Differentials in Canada Revisited","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Public sector; Economic rent; Wage; Private sector; Labour economics; Payment; Government (linguistics); Business; Economics; Finance; Economic growth; Market economy; Economy","score_opus":0.01828479393897061,"score_gpt":0.24202859030758553,"score_spread":0.2237437963686149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122777388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98009324,0.001297466,0.00021411956,0.0019861604,0.000029122079,0.00001728575,0.0032234234,0.000022894832,0.013116377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951455,0.00031552537,0.00012797772,0.000107581975,0.0000067956175,0.000004247591,0.00080719276,0.000005774228,0.0034794142],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865913,0.000058058587,0.000033412813,0.00012457228,0.0004759045,0.00064877875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975452,0.00027561912,0.00036772373,0.00008637166,0.0010484185,0.00067672034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010028726,0.00019183659,0.00044661286,0.002011769,0.0026719652,0.0013037197,0.0007929115,0.00036832446,0.0053271316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037732134,0.0001468799,0.0004123114,0.00548803,0.00090639084,0.00045432674,0.00077773904,0.0007782506,0.00020745263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027691753,0.00006511771,0.9159823,0.00007400382,0.00009555914,0.0002490301,0.005684586,0.0011332372,0.00043445584,0.015736068,0.010056235,0.050212488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010515838,0.0000139196945,0.9897432,0.000029624152,0.000015306787,0.000041388324,0.0033451184,0.0006661291,0.00011325458,0.000379251,0.0056332257,0.000008910915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033230744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033230744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032661375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24110705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122872967","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02404.x","title":"Are Children Decision‐Makers within the Household?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Sample (material); Decision process; Economics; Psychology; Sociology; Demographic economics; Political science; Management science","score_opus":0.04618836763014875,"score_gpt":0.25324127196217083,"score_spread":0.2070529043320221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122872967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95648164,0.0031243707,0.0017736132,0.006178307,0.00006167645,0.000012218653,0.00026472285,0.000008733618,0.032094706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99663156,0.00073407736,0.00030098448,0.00015166424,0.00001696659,0.000005198883,0.000033587985,0.0000021095968,0.002123785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998816,0.0005487576,0.000030106978,0.00018470554,0.00013720247,0.00028331767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797326,0.00092625886,0.0005847775,0.00010972094,0.00010116829,0.00030494173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018302317,0.00019829193,0.00031938413,0.00040770622,0.0007414356,0.002196842,0.00032456734,0.00055249396,0.007955685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048233657,0.00020231513,0.00019804176,0.0005069965,0.001588188,0.0019347905,0.000783643,0.0005278924,0.0005665662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029245816,0.00013292406,0.7428153,0.00014720511,0.00013913262,0.0013320845,0.04691315,0.0014648006,0.0011262555,0.091134414,0.0045900936,0.10991212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007274997,0.00029896805,0.5807629,0.00069353107,0.00018880113,0.0025197286,0.17198168,0.0022634098,0.0016591153,0.09748807,0.141937,0.00013414014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006618446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068328604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007955685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082394376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007762038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026614487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122934544","doi":"10.34989/swp-2017-45","title":"Identification of Random Resource Shares in Collective Households Without Preference Similarity Restrictions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Revealed preference; Consumption (sociology); Poverty; Preference; Identification (biology); Economics; Resource (disambiguation); Inequality; Distribution (mathematics); Resource distribution; Similarity (geometry); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Resource allocation; Economic growth; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07308069339559325,"score_gpt":0.33900014083968416,"score_spread":0.2659194474440909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122934544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8739314,0.00008879578,0.12264209,0.00015937959,0.0000055222404,0.000082463754,0.0005015988,0.00004016387,0.0025485998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913257,0.000047480928,0.0072283414,0.000021979038,0.000004979573,0.000055270422,0.00027119648,0.000006187175,0.0010388223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983821,0.00084974867,0.00006756524,0.00034548115,0.00013143673,0.000223694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99052995,0.00539741,0.0016157252,0.0019563285,0.00028057792,0.00022003712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039446293,0.00036035618,0.0010856026,0.00077473297,0.0005748273,0.0011405537,0.0011201991,0.00074769836,0.0044787517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017410241,0.00039382552,0.0008289922,0.0013568592,0.0015917382,0.0018848251,0.0016260303,0.0008325415,0.00028154242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005996814,0.00038722806,0.44032353,0.00022120796,0.00056279707,0.0011316069,0.003117184,0.22320549,0.0040293164,0.269588,0.0021822448,0.054651704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000883049,0.0001833563,0.11239343,0.000092901406,0.00009414452,0.00043240451,0.0024877323,0.71843034,0.0025077842,0.1603733,0.0028476983,0.00006861523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075679454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007176009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075679454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010182691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005521249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020861447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122962769","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3778806","title":"What is the Role of Firm-Specific Pay Policies on the Gender Earnings Gap in Canada?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Business; Demographic economics; Gender pay gap; Labour economics; Economics; Accounting; Wage","score_opus":0.01940180660000904,"score_gpt":0.24185006039874746,"score_spread":0.22244825379873842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122962769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92165023,0.008317224,0.00016109573,0.039120592,0.0001815994,0.00003813212,0.003252205,0.000026340222,0.027252533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927504,0.0015707149,0.00008471173,0.0010162554,0.00003262059,0.000008464644,0.000444456,0.000009880508,0.004082383],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949249,0.00021791129,0.000092199785,0.0002743583,0.00093794643,0.0035527851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98796976,0.0020540403,0.0016792655,0.00020220768,0.0041111023,0.003983658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002419903,0.00033828936,0.0012228335,0.0027255504,0.009280517,0.004676073,0.0025988298,0.0022914503,0.01456398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011234768,0.00032764865,0.0008810985,0.0044001252,0.0031423727,0.0019872228,0.0025496837,0.002953152,0.0004949511],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075631775,0.00032498883,0.82024515,0.00034628285,0.00031273536,0.00075087405,0.011713118,0.0018271089,0.00046329107,0.06263604,0.030855894,0.069768056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058132606,0.000073236515,0.9422259,0.00062091224,0.00015678225,0.00009487086,0.029757092,0.0013705976,0.00032117422,0.0043936907,0.020829935,0.000097676864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07671558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07671558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17994358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5566131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122978317","doi":"10.3386/w27838","title":"Child Skill Production: Accounting for Parental and Market-Based Time and Goods Investments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Production (economics); Accounting; Business; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.16942282860255256,"score_gpt":0.4569853899337266,"score_spread":0.2875625613311741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122978317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7824528,0.0016863424,0.1974435,0.00057382515,0.000057898604,0.00014136238,0.003440227,0.00028673603,0.013917216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96297765,0.00089860434,0.02831052,0.000049637856,0.000043765707,0.000084799656,0.0019952033,0.000058386482,0.0055813286],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931264,0.00017404318,0.0000447647,0.00017852732,0.00013780374,0.00015211661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740905,0.0013099931,0.0006113262,0.00039638992,0.00016003555,0.000113270915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001253714,0.00065035146,0.0005511265,0.0014753212,0.00032323334,0.0014467894,0.000994647,0.0006321107,0.0039118775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006546533,0.0006097264,0.0012149961,0.0025629068,0.0004826583,0.0012565097,0.0010443765,0.00072371104,0.00047550743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008830509,0.00015393793,0.33973822,0.00016401039,0.00033716706,0.00066581875,0.00036309977,0.5488545,0.0018993532,0.04135768,0.0013656961,0.06501228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034016233,0.00010665691,0.15545473,0.000103152735,0.0002044424,0.0002324306,0.00022742015,0.8102007,0.0021182785,0.023495175,0.007773424,0.000049534687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07415946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04590436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07415946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021564018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031829646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14745557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122982064","doi":"","title":"Nobody to Play with?: The Implications of Leisure Coordination","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Essex; Economic and Social Research Council; Sage Foundation","keywords":"nobody; Leisure time; Consistency (knowledge bases); Externality; Working hours; Leisure activity; Economics; Working time; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Psychology; Labour economics; Physical activity; Computer science; Work (physics); Medicine; Engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.05534654339996905,"score_gpt":0.381159795588692,"score_spread":0.325813252188723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122982064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8248209,0.0011714947,0.013781279,0.012232048,0.000067954556,0.000035453046,0.0003773484,0.00004317687,0.14747037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971021,0.00012179696,0.0005963656,0.00008149836,0.0000083886,0.000007746069,0.000026460384,0.0000063009097,0.0020492866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999395,0.00024350961,0.000016639431,0.00016794498,0.00004165112,0.00013510301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982799,0.0006639429,0.00043096143,0.00016479111,0.00007643922,0.0003840035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012554575,0.00016654238,0.00032695621,0.0004753069,0.0016290838,0.003401733,0.00060799654,0.0008721053,0.014070241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005778315,0.00019812261,0.0002509589,0.0009163193,0.003605261,0.0027817925,0.0018912113,0.00063222006,0.0006155555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004063231,0.00015712446,0.11717896,0.000108867454,0.000074202995,0.0011893093,0.025663579,0.009554797,0.00077190815,0.7573086,0.007001447,0.0805849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015395108,0.00015381988,0.21616344,0.00014693465,0.00005370529,0.0011226042,0.042194076,0.026391463,0.0004977423,0.6679654,0.045087714,0.000069225745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014254437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01072726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014254437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017447883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008475613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04706967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123103308","doi":"","title":"Immigration And The Rate Of Population Mixing: Explorations With A Stylized Model","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Population; Immigration; Demographic economics; Population size; Econometrics; Leslie matrix; Geography; Economics; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.046047891529309416,"score_gpt":0.3275839522328312,"score_spread":0.2815360607035218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123103308","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43006518,0.0017692179,0.45056716,0.010125431,0.00026413347,0.00032187422,0.0014667878,0.00044755754,0.10497275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600161,0.0012660234,0.020961417,0.000471203,0.00010556469,0.000270259,0.00024534087,0.00006838309,0.016595833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993445,0.00038156958,0.000020814015,0.000094758696,0.000051367617,0.00010692727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680305,0.0021690356,0.00044616463,0.00024856493,0.0001503935,0.00018276506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002345596,0.0006167267,0.00088288565,0.00074490794,0.0010351135,0.002626214,0.0015128246,0.002061984,0.011166305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010418318,0.00033380472,0.0011495453,0.0011123604,0.0018489653,0.0031215823,0.0019875055,0.0018719496,0.0011075959],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007898789,0.000068349065,0.0051100706,0.000056482513,0.00003354172,0.00038116737,0.001077591,0.2634089,0.0005829384,0.71903807,0.0036538595,0.0065100477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068721005,0.000061555715,0.00133143,0.00004309039,0.00003282042,0.00020075763,0.0004380127,0.65705204,0.00011809375,0.33643916,0.0041778646,0.000036344383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014012985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0082242815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014012985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023360737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010378738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037355006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123126032","doi":"","title":"More or less unmarried. The impact of legal settings of cohabitation on labor market outcomes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Alimony; Affect (linguistics); Duration (music); Demographic economics; Economics; Labour economics; Business; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03966364587916425,"score_gpt":0.38214797818027024,"score_spread":0.342484332301106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123126032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99619627,0.00032694428,0.00014198867,0.00012440879,0.0000044143476,0.000008072948,0.0006048179,0.000002895099,0.0025902076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889934,0.00006757788,0.0000509768,0.00001966964,0.0000016454005,0.0000042703523,0.00017736237,0.0000010503862,0.0007780603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995969,0.00010123253,0.000013785983,0.00008570871,0.00006579302,0.00013655183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857545,0.0002170084,0.00068673526,0.00009502282,0.00008188292,0.0003438774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000438042,0.00013137961,0.00022491977,0.00032670822,0.0006509825,0.00065573165,0.00040058244,0.00022723677,0.008150218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002170843,0.00012208399,0.0002859977,0.000507005,0.00047226858,0.00028315219,0.00083917525,0.00060730765,0.0002920988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000614277,0.00025814914,0.9668619,0.000054496144,0.00017009456,0.00029611343,0.000761795,0.0005987991,0.0015164189,0.002961171,0.0006066207,0.025300194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007808921,0.000097498436,0.99687946,0.000016740683,0.000035420297,0.000082351195,0.0012188596,0.00041658702,0.00023467909,0.0003875602,0.00061860995,0.0000043144128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103894375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16561344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103894375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074490445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064803223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20657933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123165537","doi":"","title":"Universal childcare and long-term effects on child well-being: Evidence from Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Swenson College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota Duluth","keywords":"Subsidy; Term (time); Longitudinal data; Demographic economics; Psychology; Child development; Economics; Political science; Developmental psychology; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.023379795991680743,"score_gpt":0.29998822134617975,"score_spread":0.27660842535449903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123165537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.945832,0.027397623,0.00024453428,0.0049455967,0.000058853173,0.000074235795,0.009833028,0.000016445658,0.011597629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872283,0.0086432425,0.00019003313,0.00052776607,0.000020363608,0.000022360848,0.0020007086,0.0000074497393,0.0013597502],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972459,0.0005581601,0.00013586425,0.00029440894,0.00084831147,0.00091734924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985776,0.0036073127,0.0033176418,0.00059940934,0.004885486,0.0018140661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030458681,0.0003757075,0.00073386554,0.0012972807,0.0024055452,0.0014687204,0.0013023578,0.00070269156,0.0038345866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011605131,0.00024894375,0.00090941245,0.0044017024,0.0017148759,0.00044553576,0.0011422554,0.0009195107,0.00018329438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068173825,0.00026184076,0.94451934,0.00058791536,0.0006368416,0.00020985592,0.0025182539,0.0007230193,0.00016290517,0.0021359748,0.0072821453,0.040280174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050790666,0.00006358292,0.99339056,0.00029641553,0.0002574681,0.000030440951,0.0011930392,0.00023628,0.00011339919,0.0001406938,0.0042047217,0.000022614957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99696845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033685707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033685707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046997614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24440807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123201476","doi":"","title":"Stigma and the Take-up of Social Programs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Stigma (botany); Psychology; Social stigma; Social psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Family medicine","score_opus":0.0544561275720777,"score_gpt":0.3455783051439421,"score_spread":0.2911221775718644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123201476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80906606,0.00072882423,0.005870963,0.013572189,0.00004982918,0.00010258761,0.000125018,0.000027460246,0.170457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99709296,0.0001699757,0.00022980719,0.0002470404,0.000018453124,0.000029133455,0.000009956992,0.0000029139721,0.002199755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99337465,0.0043220688,0.00015510911,0.00036044433,0.0007266879,0.0010609857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98750824,0.0068282112,0.0028108035,0.00090050977,0.00049020466,0.0014620746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049556685,0.00023102334,0.00033478378,0.0010585604,0.0037039872,0.003515537,0.00047958767,0.002374616,0.012759625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016783569,0.0002672712,0.00047178313,0.00060979184,0.0057997354,0.0021370589,0.0032911035,0.0016193814,0.00033367268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027980274,0.0010531953,0.11470242,0.00020491442,0.00015916771,0.0008073272,0.013698742,0.004082019,0.0012601407,0.78729296,0.0026990094,0.07376036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031631638,0.0007101932,0.24275985,0.0006607139,0.00017700695,0.0010130255,0.025913151,0.0118886335,0.0023650439,0.6751171,0.03895651,0.00012259289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041219713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041567255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012759625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026889301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016086287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04268521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123208366","doi":"","title":"Do Only Tax Incentives Matter? Labor Supply and Demand Responses to an Unusually Large and Salient Tax Break","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung; Washington Center for Equitable Growth","keywords":"Payroll tax; Economics; Incentive; Labour economics; Earnings; Tax rate; Income tax; Demographic economics; Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Public economics","score_opus":0.0143911932579677,"score_gpt":0.2663457661925921,"score_spread":0.2519545729346244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123208366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99418217,0.000060575116,0.00040156423,0.00093635055,0.000016835385,0.000016146485,0.0003426758,0.000008797861,0.004034842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991049,0.00002260199,0.00004586352,0.000085472544,0.0000115396515,0.000006122284,0.000091145885,0.0000031009747,0.0006291976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993907,0.00017448024,0.000027396987,0.00010118608,0.00010026669,0.00020587993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959396,0.0013467217,0.0019830049,0.00020008374,0.00014655228,0.0003841126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010793858,0.00010545501,0.0002802759,0.000371607,0.00060753105,0.0012018037,0.0002994741,0.0008121878,0.00943191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00633185,0.00014548293,0.00017543584,0.00040448128,0.0004934168,0.0005985233,0.00088422763,0.0010022913,0.0005479473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026457354,0.001454216,0.8918261,0.00017101066,0.00019883686,0.00056749815,0.0036607757,0.00997388,0.01222291,0.026783913,0.0078926375,0.042602498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041687363,0.00025632078,0.97856873,0.00002262682,0.000021967739,0.000052032432,0.0065544317,0.003593348,0.0007553395,0.0052160616,0.004894857,0.000022534588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004253072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074939714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00943191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010519811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033293993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03155285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123211115","doi":"","title":"Impacts of Eligibility Expansions and Provider Reimbursement Rate Increases on Child Care Subsidy Take-Up Rates, Welfare Use and Work","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Welfare; Welfare reform; Quarter (Canadian coin); Reimbursement; Cash; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Aid to Families with Dependent Children; Child care; Business; Single mothers; Labour economics; Economics; Medicine; Economic growth; Health care; Finance; Nursing; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.039758384380563845,"score_gpt":0.34333211789128393,"score_spread":0.3035737335107201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123211115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98598844,0.0005751791,0.00026836697,0.002005592,0.000025387268,0.00011052279,0.0015350227,0.000045495795,0.009446071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992576,0.00028712887,0.00030469283,0.00046846404,0.00003187912,0.00011893962,0.00097322505,0.000011906361,0.005227767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98907745,0.0053715226,0.00054894784,0.00089985336,0.0015918477,0.0025103693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95537937,0.021670157,0.015777865,0.0015481291,0.0024199141,0.0032045662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064258645,0.0004987809,0.0007782659,0.001268971,0.00066668866,0.0026881131,0.001277003,0.0018576416,0.009540123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024422124,0.00058538537,0.0022894496,0.0010582085,0.0011035238,0.0012873533,0.0019573793,0.002798106,0.0010537821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012684677,0.0009942051,0.9485598,0.00013682661,0.0009416964,0.0005064908,0.0005003678,0.01837057,0.0009200355,0.0018984404,0.0023217327,0.023581319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060364615,0.0005826757,0.99088985,0.000040877083,0.00026567423,0.0000738928,0.0009563757,0.0038033111,0.000550246,0.00016117844,0.002584952,0.000030615058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15749991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13147563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15749991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00612418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040936316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31316632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123228801","doi":"","title":"Une analyse des taux marginaux effectifs d'imposition au Québec","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Redistribution (election); Humanities; Welfare economics; Repartition; Economics; Art","score_opus":0.026978311473092646,"score_gpt":0.31969116361291394,"score_spread":0.2927128521398213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123228801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98422766,0.00089613954,0.0019876529,0.0007700424,0.000023504159,0.00004862522,0.0011416007,0.000040021976,0.01086483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99338514,0.0003073754,0.00046623687,0.000086402724,0.0000057316292,0.000028467959,0.000369802,0.000007591292,0.0053432155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998541,0.00047989437,0.000044849225,0.0002264053,0.00033133247,0.00037655488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99527246,0.0019966874,0.00073279603,0.0002146287,0.0013228776,0.00046054026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015888966,0.00038539985,0.00055117847,0.0005851218,0.0013127639,0.0013924622,0.0007271653,0.0004921169,0.008745603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004955666,0.0001884836,0.0005770219,0.0011018079,0.0007661153,0.000377377,0.00069256645,0.00087832985,0.00027256308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096040074,0.00029661634,0.8394471,0.0004490607,0.0011907774,0.00061011594,0.0037846277,0.048828997,0.006147326,0.01303937,0.003789982,0.08145564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016813214,0.00023250599,0.9777231,0.0000864742,0.00023400398,0.000045888057,0.0026092262,0.010320059,0.0008926536,0.00056644116,0.007238387,0.000034474695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9064827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9162028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0935173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012859013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008246874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18813604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123257937","doi":"","title":"Should day care be subsidized","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Welfare; Labour economics; Tax deduction; Work (physics); Deadweight loss; Overlapping generations model; Deductible; Tax reform; Public economics; Gross income; State income tax; Market economy; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.06515241080220256,"score_gpt":0.36723196514144857,"score_spread":0.302079554339246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123257937","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31512138,0.008752567,0.017452342,0.45423597,0.0031050835,0.00021380527,0.00113024,0.0005120398,0.19947654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94305295,0.001381043,0.0023244827,0.03315696,0.000529344,0.00007842743,0.00012532799,0.000037159727,0.01931435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913305,0.00025905552,0.00001915169,0.000110320885,0.00012180354,0.0003566276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986707,0.0003195483,0.00021507336,0.00020314517,0.00023088686,0.00036064448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096289074,0.00014875334,0.00032578508,0.00027740686,0.0005624429,0.0011306653,0.00054531306,0.0030407424,0.010019074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075252177,0.0001655743,0.00041886876,0.00028295058,0.0011152502,0.001288893,0.00092665583,0.0015464585,0.00076782895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012381921,0.0010548643,0.015690122,0.00044065158,0.00020129845,0.00043345892,0.0007504291,0.006680173,0.003100457,0.67666054,0.11830701,0.17544279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010181997,0.0004402744,0.0675529,0.00091188215,0.00018150886,0.00042607955,0.0014309997,0.0074505555,0.00317422,0.49107453,0.42627633,0.000062443505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010626019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010359433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010626019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002073046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003733488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033517122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123258972","doi":"","title":"Hourly Versus Salaried Payment and Decisions About Trading Off Time and Money Over Time","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); British Household Panel Survey; Payment; Economics; Leisure time; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Panel data; Compensation (psychology); Working time; Econometrics; Work (physics); Psychology; Finance; Social psychology","score_opus":0.010481277019382815,"score_gpt":0.26397384731876905,"score_spread":0.2534925702993862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123258972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99856395,0.00020593277,0.00007684936,0.00018817138,0.000007851009,0.000002581946,0.00020111496,0.0000015095328,0.0007520294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986173,0.00010729037,0.00006984248,0.000041970015,0.000005994691,0.0000035104854,0.0002794024,0.0000014496449,0.00087330624],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937135,0.00029894782,0.00004342741,0.00008095006,0.000060572853,0.00014482638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913083,0.0032478564,0.003761505,0.00033138532,0.00023273502,0.001118428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018038806,0.00017443237,0.00028202814,0.00049778656,0.00061637704,0.0015210696,0.00030602157,0.0009153821,0.005593841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068299714,0.00020790628,0.00039492053,0.000781225,0.0005687401,0.0006610013,0.00047702718,0.0008730208,0.0007151404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003429962,0.0002069482,0.9916549,0.000012202371,0.000066911474,0.00005587604,0.0010677389,0.00029880196,0.00016585596,0.00039374473,0.00035272015,0.005381244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014129238,0.00017399782,0.99522567,0.000013978991,0.00001854303,0.00004880213,0.0022018726,0.0010278168,0.0000681917,0.0005210383,0.000671463,0.000014445899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017608281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050471753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017608281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006672858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027649512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03501159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123269311","doi":"","title":"Do Child Tax Benefits Affect the Wellbeing of Children? Evidence from Canadian Child Benefit Expansions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Dalhousie University; McGill University","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Public economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.047682166198204395,"score_gpt":0.33618141927785167,"score_spread":0.2884992530796473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123269311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8449988,0.06343209,0.0002268098,0.01315545,0.00015173305,0.00008240871,0.018490853,0.00002261121,0.05943925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97477174,0.01874166,0.00018141861,0.000986608,0.00003685219,0.0000206397,0.0024908334,0.000012149468,0.0027580336],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733967,0.0003661071,0.00012751058,0.00027808777,0.0011605339,0.0007282124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98720586,0.0032001894,0.0032320444,0.0005826333,0.0045084693,0.001270735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002956286,0.0003484074,0.0006390538,0.0020632884,0.0026041858,0.0018587188,0.0015249657,0.00069612946,0.007444721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01329489,0.00026975368,0.0008156364,0.006662131,0.0015517798,0.00054788566,0.0016032349,0.0011530607,0.00028564566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005126009,0.00011477161,0.91662014,0.0007981277,0.00050437474,0.0003328797,0.0047838064,0.00041219074,0.000084630585,0.0051682508,0.013632125,0.057036012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001898275,0.000020585152,0.98777944,0.00039786936,0.00018725015,0.000041669253,0.0018296092,0.00008137727,0.00005231981,0.00017586227,0.009398622,0.000016388984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027075691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027075691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030776586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1964488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123333965","doi":"","title":"Evidence of Added Worker Effect from the 2008 Economic Crisis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"Economics; Unemployment; Instrumental variable; Quarter (Canadian coin); Interdependence; Labour economics; Identification (biology); Turkish; Discouraged worker; Demographic economics; Unemployment rate; Econometrics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.06751457204461025,"score_gpt":0.3640851768920382,"score_spread":0.2965706048474279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123333965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923246,0.00040832715,0.0003321318,0.00091714674,0.000048326572,0.000012811338,0.00059782667,0.000015337844,0.005343531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785703,0.00023702659,0.00006571322,0.00013951627,0.000040666262,0.0000073209007,0.00034078,0.000005176366,0.0013066846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995053,0.00011448524,0.00002524076,0.00011378405,0.000116558585,0.00012469875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971898,0.001039899,0.0010108526,0.00023243712,0.00028729645,0.00023961772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007216907,0.00021047828,0.00033819553,0.00059567834,0.00036723982,0.00051613007,0.00032527576,0.00064649683,0.011637672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036178452,0.00016354687,0.00028942976,0.0004599883,0.0005613228,0.00028784634,0.0011568861,0.0006549082,0.0009298101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016476873,0.00025292527,0.94447404,0.00027344874,0.00016690625,0.0010874628,0.0025439342,0.0010166308,0.002804637,0.0013430897,0.003909102,0.04048004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010627522,0.0001263294,0.9953694,0.000025106512,0.000029949002,0.000098378405,0.0014644723,0.00020980428,0.00032040945,0.00025410418,0.0020847654,0.0000066158295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005153163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005734364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011637672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003566669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003277686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038931847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123346627","doi":"","title":"The Determinants of University Participation in Canada (1977?2003)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Market liquidity; Demographic economics; Regret; Economics; Balance (ability); Propensity score matching; Secular variation; Demography; Psychology; Sociology; Monetary economics; Medicine; Population","score_opus":0.04312186501064033,"score_gpt":0.32230195669165707,"score_spread":0.27918009168101676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123346627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94599,0.0032802653,0.00022577842,0.0053806687,0.000109712884,0.00007148876,0.029392859,0.000070150505,0.015479038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97948945,0.0015149611,0.00018559169,0.0003578242,0.000051979616,0.000028794982,0.006492364,0.000022956068,0.011856173],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912924,0.00003768838,0.000027743832,0.000090603586,0.00019447488,0.00052026333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958889,0.00023958256,0.00066780037,0.00009772003,0.0011672687,0.001938757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007868437,0.00030797493,0.00049963576,0.00225744,0.0035129753,0.0022109677,0.0014455492,0.001152139,0.00919005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025021015,0.0002681682,0.0007356447,0.005242978,0.0007848024,0.00042792875,0.0009787243,0.0013961582,0.0010604742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026299694,0.00016066842,0.94040996,0.000119894285,0.00012826582,0.00024208022,0.0033640326,0.0007244473,0.00030104106,0.0030304603,0.022753514,0.028502688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009341344,0.000012575883,0.98694915,0.000065417626,0.0000169315,0.000041765106,0.001350282,0.0003783497,0.00007887809,0.000090693284,0.010991034,0.00001541122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99818265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035245154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035245154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040453985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25572264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123353613","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.683984","title":"The Effects of Welfare-to-Work Program Activities on Labor Market Outcomes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Quarter (Canadian coin); Human capital; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Odds; Labour economics; Economics; Business; Logistic regression; Medicine; Economic growth; Accounting; Engineering","score_opus":0.004896482719773389,"score_gpt":0.2681001670280376,"score_spread":0.2632036843082642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123353613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99784935,0.00030105517,0.000019853884,0.00024575536,0.000015843425,0.0000116816855,0.000250688,0.0000023939688,0.0013035357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989693,0.00013353884,0.00001726458,0.000033662083,0.000022022365,0.000011418136,0.00015574129,0.0000018691431,0.00065510307],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987801,0.00044935688,0.000047697562,0.00009241609,0.00008482454,0.00054568803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99284595,0.0029870868,0.0011839784,0.00022736633,0.00026298122,0.002492679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017520281,0.00032065914,0.0005424969,0.0008819351,0.0010022025,0.0010145792,0.0006869615,0.000985672,0.010674635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007894538,0.000191613,0.00095171464,0.0008421214,0.00067737146,0.0007479004,0.0013400817,0.0011395833,0.00045429837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013578301,0.008915107,0.93085164,0.00010054831,0.00053507526,0.00039085335,0.0008310399,0.00054796145,0.000996782,0.0009087183,0.00076594035,0.041578077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010164954,0.0014541404,0.9966294,0.00002057151,0.00011359936,0.000032210493,0.0007559562,0.0001823478,0.00014743728,0.000282619,0.00027283625,0.0000072107364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009382218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01604407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010674635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006141259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014430006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035710156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123359116","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Marriage and Divorce","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Marriage market; Demographic economics; Conditional cash transfer; Cash; Marital status; Cash transfers; Labour economics; Economic growth; Demography; Finance","score_opus":0.034524638536880335,"score_gpt":0.35839449342560964,"score_spread":0.3238698548887293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123359116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99660885,0.00037170504,0.00009416455,0.00035173752,0.000007530753,0.000011253529,0.00017189843,0.000004477096,0.0023784859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998919,0.0002233629,0.000037527323,0.00003950531,0.000009476736,0.000007697297,0.000096685755,8.049527e-7,0.0006659005],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988476,0.0005678605,0.000028889146,0.00006455455,0.00014462863,0.00034631274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99224067,0.004012284,0.0024228261,0.00017885742,0.00025417394,0.00089117704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013724158,0.00015909308,0.00021065638,0.0006005764,0.00089977257,0.00062670046,0.00035943463,0.0003805096,0.007156515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00939705,0.0001089902,0.00033344878,0.0005937424,0.00059466495,0.0005195519,0.0012702686,0.0007399339,0.00020948464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031969133,0.002164631,0.8926644,0.00011479932,0.0003197711,0.0006986354,0.0013816641,0.0044814805,0.0007520195,0.005790746,0.0021530131,0.086282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008024332,0.00090697693,0.9906669,0.000042102973,0.00012281518,0.00011549286,0.0018270385,0.0018502761,0.0004498307,0.00195265,0.001971569,0.000014051861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017317979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024779204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017317979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013424654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086805003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03443438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123387846","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1855150","title":"Estimating Labor Supply Responses and Welfare Participation: Using a Natural Experiment to Validate a Structural Labor Supply Model","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Economics; Labour economics; Natural experiment; Natural (archaeology); Market economy; Medicine","score_opus":0.03411354028384295,"score_gpt":0.3295323047041423,"score_spread":0.29541876442029935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123387846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921336,0.0000066309367,0.006447371,0.00009769689,0.000015043366,0.0004419887,0.00023400396,0.000016716165,0.00060686923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840146,0.00002076069,0.011767557,0.000113917544,0.000018833889,0.0023069184,0.0005201885,0.000008536193,0.0012286914],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99454486,0.004380216,0.00015600907,0.0004982476,0.00020639562,0.00021419914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9219736,0.06948397,0.0036586865,0.003390784,0.00093099807,0.0005619404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011190968,0.00069553003,0.00064772286,0.00037316704,0.00096627726,0.00097314734,0.0013490835,0.0022691414,0.003971679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029623747,0.000685267,0.0006922537,0.0005120948,0.001313824,0.0010557169,0.0007903505,0.0014957538,0.0006075488],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.035948515,0.16890672,0.4884091,0.000864536,0.0014056525,0.00062922185,0.012048412,0.1551748,0.035390213,0.029814681,0.004812886,0.06659523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0122645125,0.07553686,0.34216714,0.00008830581,0.000925534,0.00020485498,0.007417499,0.5024317,0.018433731,0.033848993,0.006347525,0.000333334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068971985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006941336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011190968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013112025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001592255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059184194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123450516","doi":"","title":"How do the U.S and Canadian Social Safety Nets Compare for Women and Children","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Welfare; Demographic economics; Cash transfers; Social assistance; Welfare reform; Economics; Single mothers; Social policy; Public assistance; Political science; Economic growth; Psychology","score_opus":0.03710050180260161,"score_gpt":0.3209348140239153,"score_spread":0.2838343122213137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123450516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5852301,0.029468771,0.0008448709,0.099621736,0.0012243467,0.00014437361,0.02598988,0.00012258696,0.2573533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96883273,0.009584755,0.00043536222,0.0045136544,0.0001411455,0.0000550677,0.0043437476,0.00008989637,0.012003604],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99345475,0.0005051283,0.00012354288,0.00054273766,0.00259932,0.0027744966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99054307,0.0006806633,0.00083988515,0.00027859845,0.0050888266,0.0025688673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003922285,0.00042625944,0.00083945756,0.006041532,0.007289788,0.0057841064,0.0018875935,0.001014107,0.008572933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017738743,0.00033184508,0.0011992982,0.010640507,0.0028875358,0.0024837458,0.0029705567,0.0016770636,0.00077900407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033442193,0.000059078084,0.6250057,0.00039329915,0.00058519474,0.00021406432,0.033195842,0.00090369995,0.00031346138,0.041464776,0.11664519,0.18088527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020707957,0.000031091902,0.8876591,0.0005342761,0.00013250382,0.000049170307,0.027471578,0.00019776932,0.0002061925,0.0017409171,0.08186274,0.00009398984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99548846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07488639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07488639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.075529516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54334134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123467327","doi":"10.1111/coep.2015.33.issue-2","title":"Privatization in China: Technology and Gender in the Manufacturing Sector","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Productivity; Wage; Production (economics); Labour economics; China; Panel data; Business; Manufacturing sector; Low wage; Demographic economics; Economics; Economic growth; Econometrics","score_opus":0.035903292255357544,"score_gpt":0.3143734612893097,"score_spread":0.27847016903395216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123467327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985832,0.00020323666,0.00006889234,0.00020693705,0.000003806612,0.0000037611478,0.00006608759,0.0000020802154,0.00086197053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994351,0.000078906494,0.000014940264,0.000022697324,0.000003903706,0.0000014982976,0.000043676526,4.9045525e-7,0.0003988037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944943,0.0000721731,0.000024910689,0.00008228006,0.00012631282,0.0002448986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987643,0.00015975065,0.0006847402,0.000076122094,0.00009766145,0.00021753083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007215697,0.00016539537,0.00023966469,0.00095914863,0.0009599783,0.00067232974,0.00026102774,0.00028386415,0.0026697058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012841871,0.00012005907,0.00034974955,0.0015529683,0.0008143204,0.0007537079,0.0008626484,0.00031740015,0.00012451841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094238036,0.000065884495,0.98095393,0.000027253769,0.000032944405,0.0003076755,0.0020574727,0.0005401562,0.000994934,0.0019667048,0.0003010086,0.01265776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023065152,0.000035609635,0.9977337,0.000007546317,0.000006593292,0.000029175651,0.0008590053,0.00032119936,0.00016572508,0.0002589195,0.0005766833,0.0000034785085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055239648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08628302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055239648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023413973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022053784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10983622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123504590","doi":"","title":"Volunteer Activity and the Demands of Work and Family","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Volunteer; Variety (cybernetics); Econometric analysis; Function (biology); Volunteer work; Business; Public relations; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics; Political science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.023973452397554364,"score_gpt":0.2897938812718444,"score_spread":0.26582042887429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123504590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9649587,0.00075851526,0.0001904391,0.0022734266,0.000043551285,0.0000074731765,0.00014221843,0.0000040736295,0.03162148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982322,0.00019602448,0.00002923681,0.000040526156,0.000020092039,0.000005711184,0.000034544264,0.0000026323896,0.0014390555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844056,0.0009981543,0.00006111544,0.00007939972,0.00015846848,0.0002624183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992763,0.0028116852,0.0015410115,0.0004787004,0.00046949522,0.001936197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001410783,0.00012822247,0.00021450924,0.0009361374,0.0018786822,0.0024375257,0.0003107103,0.0005913332,0.00756323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008227596,0.00013594815,0.00017403995,0.0010048796,0.0017264434,0.001071595,0.0012570723,0.00038161754,0.00066703506],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011746152,0.0006024261,0.735592,0.00026848543,0.0001298218,0.0016521021,0.1239577,0.0007435108,0.0017948592,0.035586182,0.010720088,0.087778136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005320828,0.0002000046,0.81676626,0.00015724776,0.000022697652,0.00091684517,0.13730145,0.00048147145,0.00023210276,0.013680933,0.030140933,0.000046846602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00461938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010088739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00756323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008564285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010337416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025301516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123507580","doi":"","title":"An Analysis of Effective Marginal Tax Rates in Quebec","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Microsimulation; Economics; Redistribution (election); Population; Demographic economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Distribution (mathematics); Income tax; Labour economics; Public economics; Geography","score_opus":0.017552807349296727,"score_gpt":0.2772355120530642,"score_spread":0.2596827047037675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123507580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96574414,0.0007344594,0.004711868,0.0008951348,0.000017343922,0.000055538985,0.0056241704,0.00013688498,0.02208048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941592,0.0001376487,0.0008098817,0.000038170227,0.000003184025,0.000011549126,0.001183485,0.00001764168,0.0036391746],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994518,0.0001418858,0.000014016506,0.000064151594,0.00012955838,0.0001985864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979936,0.0005247065,0.0002095277,0.00013608545,0.0010151515,0.000120948986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090209546,0.00023753449,0.0003354203,0.0013130703,0.00076622376,0.001465154,0.0009144961,0.00036331548,0.0056875465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043859496,0.00017929275,0.00038144295,0.0019100421,0.0003826445,0.00043249293,0.00031060696,0.0005111541,0.00020528739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023870206,0.00010194707,0.3240962,0.00008638903,0.0003117705,0.00046587322,0.0007388506,0.5111611,0.0013692906,0.105950765,0.014356281,0.041122835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025034578,0.00003456713,0.37703523,0.000052914667,0.00004396044,0.00008421249,0.00063441496,0.6026552,0.00049951306,0.0039090426,0.014962886,0.00006307302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9746286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95704865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030838171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030838171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058601554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22374761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123523100","doi":"","title":"The Instability of Family Earnings and Family Income in Canada, 1986 to 1991 and 1996 to 2001","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Unemployment; Demographic economics; Economics; Transfer payment; Distribution (mathematics); Family income; Labour economics; Economic growth; Finance","score_opus":0.03105094483727124,"score_gpt":0.31417173319800246,"score_spread":0.28312078836073123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123523100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98014647,0.0012491235,0.00006982053,0.0010725196,0.000019815696,0.000026614656,0.012251788,0.000018564826,0.005145117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98397195,0.0010521335,0.000102579004,0.00012769367,0.000016330483,0.000018867482,0.009504423,0.000009896186,0.005196097],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998831,0.000044414497,0.00006007436,0.00010898601,0.00041280096,0.00054271246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952009,0.00023229962,0.0011480296,0.00011851031,0.0024525635,0.0008476956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010295641,0.00036675803,0.00050404685,0.0030493683,0.004339406,0.002431284,0.0012671395,0.0006543071,0.0025073267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005832875,0.00031164364,0.00044761403,0.008574757,0.00076850306,0.0007665002,0.0015939645,0.0012072633,0.00038990297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025000685,0.000053148982,0.97386825,0.000049623708,0.000063955405,0.00023691742,0.0038408563,0.00064975786,0.00011710313,0.0007337452,0.004594216,0.015542435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003319853,0.0000059863046,0.9962316,0.000019927287,0.000005036332,0.00002141798,0.0012299956,0.00016458932,0.000034582015,0.000021331447,0.0022550416,0.000007087008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9970481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06376386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06376386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033935305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4626413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123551066","doi":"","title":"What do “residuals” from first-order conditions reveal about DGE models?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Brock University; University of Toronto; York University; McMaster University; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); Econometrics; Economics; Aggregate (composite); Order (exchange); Consumption (sociology); Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04092719222379416,"score_gpt":0.33578996555109697,"score_spread":0.2948627733273028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123551066","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43697047,0.0045063123,0.5227193,0.01392742,0.0005505077,0.000110580746,0.004194251,0.0013628555,0.015658265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608544,0.0048184386,0.02323959,0.0011288407,0.0006820199,0.00012252263,0.0043021305,0.00061104854,0.004241071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827754,0.00070674764,0.0001330579,0.00039152874,0.00028430356,0.00020679283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95159036,0.032294817,0.0077062673,0.005661731,0.0019203823,0.0008264855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008091139,0.001021385,0.0021931755,0.0017186743,0.0006292969,0.004080722,0.0021331515,0.0027106728,0.005598299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07727785,0.00090079295,0.0013995944,0.0017186743,0.0030250135,0.009820578,0.0015444967,0.0042029126,0.0010515788],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003672178,0.00018930968,0.10509946,0.0009779362,0.0008084322,0.0007542552,0.002035964,0.23800786,0.0013128959,0.55255806,0.010555569,0.087333046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054111897,0.00012485555,0.02078783,0.00023263594,0.000108201355,0.00015990695,0.0005566356,0.22765951,0.00067262823,0.7437245,0.005789735,0.00012944166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007898939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050097206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008091139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012713053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094005227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042790532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123554108","doi":"10.25336/p60602","title":"Wage differentials of males and females in same-sex and different-sex couples in Canada, 2006–2010","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Earnings; Wage; Differential (mechanical device); Psychology; Demographic economics; Demography; Economics; Labour economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.044399077535751605,"score_gpt":0.2886738264042203,"score_spread":0.24427474886846867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123554108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990567,0.00046767152,0.000062091276,0.00026680878,0.0000150224205,0.000014534729,0.0068572992,0.000007819483,0.0017418031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99320674,0.00040862916,0.00011146173,0.00008930445,0.0000061199803,0.0000072931375,0.0043604863,0.0000034108002,0.001806481],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994599,0.00003449807,0.0000327226,0.00007923866,0.00019453962,0.00019899277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985796,0.000062578,0.00029231887,0.000037873975,0.0006307227,0.00039691987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050210214,0.0002241713,0.0002612197,0.0015915447,0.0017449072,0.00070779136,0.0008008391,0.00031100668,0.0015394848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016428393,0.0002033492,0.00035726698,0.0029099598,0.0004877404,0.00034008647,0.0007823246,0.0005658856,0.00020001727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008791495,0.00002843555,0.9881181,0.000029165789,0.000037428403,0.00004917638,0.0014533282,0.00014520195,0.00019748275,0.00018940182,0.0019753342,0.0076889303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011873229,0.0000052590076,0.99814105,0.000006157298,0.0000037300376,0.000017178441,0.0010221064,0.000074435455,0.000034009197,0.000007681502,0.00068361306,0.0000036151487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99100095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012487305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012487305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0100353435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09060216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123556337","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.10.002","title":"Assortative marriage and the effects of government homecare subsidy programs on gender wage and participation inequality","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Economics; Labour economics; Inequality; Government (linguistics); Wage inequality; Wage; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.02977717320365006,"score_gpt":0.27468594624794346,"score_spread":0.2449087730442934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123556337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949982,0.00030954203,0.000067477595,0.0010580826,0.000017243328,0.000008568339,0.00007481258,0.000002324362,0.00346378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993912,0.000069786634,0.000014103453,0.00005979668,0.000011755074,0.0000040144114,0.000018055267,7.088115e-7,0.0004305513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981912,0.0008724175,0.000042131087,0.00009389754,0.000113352384,0.0006870002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910137,0.005033084,0.0016081526,0.00026416345,0.00021181903,0.0018691128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021344179,0.00015638176,0.00054369273,0.0005980523,0.0015700608,0.0011527753,0.0006291629,0.0013187998,0.012767329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010014658,0.00019676227,0.0006345329,0.0007623604,0.0013065527,0.0008943783,0.0016357087,0.0015575872,0.00032912067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044641085,0.0057579763,0.922286,0.000052237072,0.00036000877,0.00055094925,0.002998629,0.0017404065,0.00076058693,0.018761544,0.0013719319,0.040895686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002223326,0.000835142,0.98209953,0.00004501733,0.00020108615,0.00012530528,0.005921004,0.0021856765,0.0002659986,0.0067308145,0.0013518344,0.000016277505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019819465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032912735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019819465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095868995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013654415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0427109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123617270","doi":"","title":"How is Economic Hardship Avoided by Those Retiring Before the Social Security Entitlement Age","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Pension; Earnings; Social security; Poverty; Health and Retirement Study; Economics; Retirement age; Labour economics; Consumption (sociology); Demographic economics; Annuity; Economic growth; Finance; Medicine; Sociology; Life annuity; Gerontology","score_opus":0.017002542979751116,"score_gpt":0.28580479358259486,"score_spread":0.26880225060284374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123617270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98059046,0.001064343,0.00011192307,0.008758095,0.00011589425,0.000009025591,0.00017532718,0.000005701844,0.009169328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979482,0.00065351604,0.000060068567,0.000454469,0.000030176676,0.000005006843,0.0000799226,0.0000024701121,0.00076617405],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842775,0.0005051388,0.00004802758,0.00010907362,0.000117734875,0.0007922175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972727,0.0004652209,0.000898942,0.00012993345,0.00027773224,0.0009555877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015451028,0.00016495987,0.000400113,0.0010891582,0.0024158063,0.0024942944,0.00049061765,0.0008997858,0.0029402561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007674324,0.00016824847,0.0005251634,0.0011459455,0.0012356379,0.0026117058,0.0014275638,0.001279984,0.0004986573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021090062,0.00031334173,0.8775623,0.0000918585,0.00024092589,0.0004495623,0.023234429,0.0003484878,0.00033777018,0.0069269603,0.009638034,0.08064543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022001132,0.00020261116,0.88957465,0.0002072293,0.00007318306,0.00032454627,0.087452434,0.00019239783,0.00018859017,0.004282598,0.017444476,0.00003527085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022453962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049260072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022453962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012356295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015474049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04464656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123621738","doi":"10.25071/1916-0925.40187","title":"Time Preference and Religious Affiliation in Canada: A Quantitative Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Jewish Studies / Études juives canadiennes","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proxy (statistics); Demographic economics; Investment (military); Economics; Population; Preference; Time preference; Permanent income hypothesis; Welfare economics; Sociology; Demography; Political science; Microeconomics; Monetary economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.038311149276579845,"score_gpt":0.25680379852920354,"score_spread":0.21849264925262368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123621738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97458106,0.0006256885,0.0010538636,0.00058093073,0.000012424637,0.000109215354,0.01240673,0.000034041313,0.010595994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98958826,0.00038661447,0.0013318574,0.00008882224,0.000007639344,0.00007695338,0.004699015,0.00000918688,0.0038116416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983393,0.0003057465,0.00009530153,0.00015044985,0.00075965386,0.0003494726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99250776,0.0020259893,0.0010548782,0.00027461306,0.003250833,0.00088583055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017987175,0.00024713436,0.0003516806,0.0041414956,0.0026950699,0.0016639687,0.00087102497,0.00037673934,0.0048883967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007546816,0.00016282518,0.00075197074,0.012645806,0.0008972458,0.00046357737,0.0009997188,0.00053617824,0.00030616048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007161632,0.000051757044,0.979404,0.00006435828,0.000084272535,0.00010637757,0.0021790406,0.0011982638,0.00016360403,0.0028339408,0.001587145,0.012255637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006240209,0.000031416683,0.988926,0.000030809762,0.000022760285,0.000049608083,0.003296083,0.003039081,0.00006521003,0.00028723732,0.00421835,0.000027334336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9906063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98839813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027257975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027257975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025409121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19777143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123690318","doi":"","title":"Consumer Demand System Estimation and Value Added Tax Reforms in the Czech Republic","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ASEP","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Almost ideal demand system; Economics; Czech; Revenue; Estimation; Value-added tax; Value (mathematics); Econometrics; Tax revenue; Quarter (Canadian coin); Consumption (sociology); Ad valorem tax; Government revenue; Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Public economics; Tax reform; Demand management; Statistics","score_opus":0.015938224289419215,"score_gpt":0.2705439014187026,"score_spread":0.2546056771292834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123690318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807662,0.00016142732,0.011744273,0.00022903574,0.000017039094,0.000104117426,0.0022565643,0.00008639939,0.0046349694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953576,0.000052901007,0.002706453,0.000016728205,0.0000023851344,0.000033771572,0.00097234995,0.000014462923,0.00084346044],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911195,0.0003620117,0.00006151628,0.00015570708,0.00011309365,0.00019571361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811906,0.0010691904,0.00027990987,0.00016829328,0.00028517022,0.00007831456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002215951,0.00040123521,0.00059051224,0.001178035,0.000366061,0.0010304281,0.00081510295,0.00058412884,0.0035334863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067363316,0.000494586,0.0014025664,0.0017075528,0.00042816476,0.00069928786,0.00087088597,0.0007914135,0.00032035323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016797434,0.00011729786,0.1296942,0.00008586763,0.00015204045,0.00013163978,0.00014522196,0.8550491,0.0005621198,0.0063377228,0.001138519,0.0064182603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000750218,0.0001050524,0.11132295,0.00004965988,0.00007836609,0.000054894033,0.0008817467,0.8802162,0.0008469626,0.0030680324,0.0032312886,0.00006989134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15883759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065755524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15883759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029921958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022910282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31582612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123724789","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Student Debt on Education, Career, and Marriage Choices of Female Lawyers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Subsidy; Student debt; Wage; Promotion (chess); Labour economics; Quality (philosophy); Economics; Business; Political science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.017482863140015938,"score_gpt":0.34381748707406856,"score_spread":0.3263346239340526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123724789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775056,0.0002771452,0.010054335,0.0023065743,0.000021885853,0.00004374302,0.0009548055,0.000029692039,0.008806136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98879236,0.00026380064,0.0007326224,0.000110414665,0.000017204078,0.000043674532,0.00030629468,0.000007855963,0.009725758],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960095,0.0001287464,0.000012313587,0.00005908065,0.000032702632,0.0001663511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850285,0.0006560351,0.00045181738,0.000042773478,0.00006187877,0.00028459317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085768005,0.00032951374,0.00079037005,0.00050280907,0.00068090204,0.0017091167,0.00090837973,0.0016997196,0.012284293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035026812,0.00044928247,0.0006235149,0.00059800356,0.0005617761,0.0009207561,0.0012395722,0.0016054828,0.000999404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081375794,0.0013521105,0.3757522,0.00010644031,0.00014903084,0.001669731,0.0011210631,0.49827766,0.0018363135,0.07768487,0.0058462727,0.035390586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002578441,0.0005642703,0.08986674,0.00006993222,0.00013870753,0.00032731827,0.0016344864,0.87791836,0.00050854776,0.022445008,0.0061939857,0.00007482874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030512607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0226545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030512607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00189236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011411057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06067002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123763901","doi":"","title":"Intra-Household Behavioral Responses to Cash Transfer Programs: Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Regression discontinuity design; Formality; Conditional cash transfer; Cash; Demographic economics; Cash transfers; Economics; Random assignment; Welfare; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Poverty; Medicine; Finance; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.13435283307791895,"score_gpt":0.37746914266711684,"score_spread":0.2431163095891979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123763901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98723316,0.00030750176,0.009798334,0.00018696266,0.00002553906,0.00019371267,0.00071533816,0.000048545295,0.0014908451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952798,0.00011195929,0.0022404215,0.0001505187,0.000018356805,0.00029521884,0.0008225321,0.0000126743325,0.0010685055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9661474,0.029480506,0.00068726274,0.0015520027,0.0011368042,0.0009960297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87309295,0.0971449,0.016616717,0.0107943015,0.0014193979,0.00093180576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023896525,0.0004996091,0.0011500431,0.001270176,0.0007062121,0.0010183743,0.0023879667,0.0015269666,0.005078991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061650623,0.00043510375,0.0016340215,0.0013006873,0.0011138513,0.00063505775,0.001857684,0.0018535975,0.0008080705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009211284,0.004059805,0.9202628,0.0003921065,0.0032983508,0.00051690266,0.005312043,0.0054437276,0.0020277586,0.004476622,0.0014219641,0.04357657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059832557,0.004608994,0.9271023,0.00012289957,0.0016099501,0.0003618436,0.0033771724,0.053468835,0.001884631,0.003802752,0.0029593797,0.00010296081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011925176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049917744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023896525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057454326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045498574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12637842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123764536","doi":"","title":"The differential impact of universal child benefits on the labor supply of married and single mothers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Single mothers; Economics; Margin (machine learning); Child care; Demographic economics; Percentage point; Labour economics; Medicine; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.03406221452663127,"score_gpt":0.3084240158189167,"score_spread":0.27436180129228543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123764536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926911,0.0006199752,0.00030808387,0.00043207506,0.000020888057,0.000021316313,0.0017030818,0.000008789232,0.0041946364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945904,0.00033156644,0.00020012735,0.000073640855,0.000010063682,0.000011908323,0.0010376254,0.0000034006853,0.0037413058],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998618,0.00025925305,0.000041313215,0.00015898548,0.00036997275,0.0005524506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976532,0.0010106483,0.0004846162,0.00012161617,0.00027994308,0.00045000584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010958549,0.000193011,0.0005659612,0.00065279007,0.00046974875,0.0007072779,0.00052748295,0.00029252906,0.0071424334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005327809,0.00015591158,0.00072002277,0.0008913424,0.0006406942,0.00024150366,0.0008569775,0.00066441693,0.00030486894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004990282,0.00010192283,0.9654206,0.00008557915,0.00029784383,0.00021438897,0.001149557,0.0014623627,0.0012406781,0.0024045429,0.0010286858,0.026094882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015266674,0.00009424071,0.99506074,0.000026348707,0.00008069227,0.00003664759,0.0014398664,0.0007804222,0.0003400659,0.00028036087,0.0018386173,0.0000066987564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6858421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7234431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6858421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032201966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004201015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63201606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123810896","doi":"","title":"Poverty-Reducing Tax Reforms with Heterogeneous Agents","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Stochastic dominance; Poverty; Economics; Dominance (genetics); Econometrics; Public economics; Metric (unit); Variation (astronomy); Economic growth","score_opus":0.03845934690610677,"score_gpt":0.3240484207959243,"score_spread":0.2855890738898175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123810896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7461856,0.00036416185,0.21900977,0.0033627923,0.00011006356,0.0005616511,0.0004652298,0.00011217136,0.02982866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978733,0.00021483048,0.013094332,0.000078852696,0.00005819181,0.00011935004,0.000070192655,0.000013049981,0.0076181097],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968081,0.0020511623,0.00008744472,0.00027005552,0.0002388262,0.0005443954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923332,0.0043095853,0.0015967296,0.00077063905,0.0004717829,0.0005180805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004650404,0.00061667146,0.0013200414,0.00067138724,0.0008439328,0.0017876602,0.00082309946,0.0010238942,0.00574899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017283987,0.00033804856,0.0007139767,0.0008039457,0.0012058113,0.0017904268,0.0022350429,0.0010654605,0.00042120914],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075892796,0.0005900687,0.010176905,0.00012893822,0.00019921665,0.00037546715,0.00053945795,0.47966874,0.0013782296,0.4421706,0.004142129,0.05987132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037326606,0.00033932223,0.0019275997,0.00002264664,0.00007794473,0.000066796056,0.00040305988,0.7957506,0.0008740143,0.19487855,0.005262999,0.000023135097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00422192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035059035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00574899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017010933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017449204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02459395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123812599","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.105643","title":"Loss aversion and the welfare ranking of policy interventions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spiral (Imperial College London)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Narodowym Centrum Nauki; Narodowe Centrum Nauki","keywords":"Loss aversion; Econometrics; Economics; Resampling; Ranking (information retrieval); Stochastic dominance; Nonparametric statistics; Welfare; Inference; Dominance (genetics); Statistics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.022047480222054695,"score_gpt":0.2997454358884901,"score_spread":0.2776979556664354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123812599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4987564,0.01636292,0.14005622,0.053003523,0.0009054815,0.00085857476,0.002054715,0.0005875799,0.28741467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850513,0.0016803034,0.0057159336,0.000939148,0.00023319994,0.00020878307,0.0001781628,0.0000415005,0.005951719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96363074,0.0295328,0.00083173753,0.0006869843,0.002745374,0.0025724436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95308715,0.038710363,0.0024963452,0.0013970826,0.0025577531,0.0017512883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03661112,0.0012118656,0.0031739513,0.0063723056,0.001514997,0.0074834954,0.001136655,0.0028869072,0.012054007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072643675,0.0005611858,0.0012269714,0.0023935498,0.0058728196,0.0048490856,0.0043068347,0.0035942206,0.0005995224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038832927,0.0005767168,0.013830891,0.0009597131,0.00089593837,0.00017199654,0.00058736623,0.102082,0.0006325149,0.6815736,0.015606184,0.1791997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041155578,0.0008807037,0.009428462,0.00043807027,0.0002161594,0.000088236106,0.0013487898,0.07508734,0.00043289165,0.9026193,0.008961665,0.000086801214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025193049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002820151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03661112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006205734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004236569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19362044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123852265","doi":"","title":"Targeting Policies: Multiple Testing and Distributional Treatment Effects","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Michigan Diabetes Research Center, University of Michigan","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Earnings; Distribution (mathematics); Welfare; Inference; Economics; Econometrics; Treatment effect; Public economics; Microeconomics; Medicine; Computer science; Mathematics; Accounting","score_opus":0.05621270622691487,"score_gpt":0.3429477923267637,"score_spread":0.2867350860998488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123852265","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12005504,0.0011616898,0.8520039,0.01083007,0.00087552395,0.0012270298,0.0004502505,0.0007363439,0.012660138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79389393,0.00024849805,0.20069766,0.0010528147,0.00042175784,0.0018795894,0.00018773937,0.00011328672,0.001504725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.713059,0.24247532,0.005483713,0.018854136,0.017195126,0.0029326598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3087934,0.6164954,0.028707998,0.035224948,0.008537068,0.0022412974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16544731,0.0015948237,0.0038489245,0.003442585,0.0027381086,0.0044726348,0.0060882177,0.004516352,0.0078108204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5243296,0.0010383001,0.0037530703,0.003562389,0.016340442,0.007640821,0.00501172,0.00808485,0.00044179335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025596223,0.0009368746,0.092556395,0.001083701,0.0044900626,0.0016747612,0.004386734,0.040580004,0.001791554,0.44826165,0.008800834,0.39287782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042677252,0.00089296274,0.018079724,0.00029349417,0.0005173585,0.00048218743,0.0009906534,0.23420401,0.0033535142,0.73565465,0.0049537914,0.00015098076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004002724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022325933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16544731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004055416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005073575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8749795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123857463","doi":"","title":"Localization of Determinants of Fertility Through Measurement Adaptations in Developing-Country Settings: The Case of Iran Comment on 'Analysis of Economic Determinants of Fertility in Iran: A Multilevel Approach'","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Information System of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences (Ardabil University of Medical Sciences)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Developing country; Inequality; Work (physics); Economics; Demographic economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Population; Demography; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.1441105618508553,"score_gpt":0.35156373620858616,"score_spread":0.20745317435773086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123857463","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010145698,0.0016576246,0.0009669692,0.983959,0.0019167347,0.000015629781,0.00011366175,0.000014307869,0.0012103225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31361485,0.004266449,0.0036331087,0.6676476,0.008095599,0.00020298282,0.00013536215,0.00007075461,0.002333313],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848985,0.008828303,0.0010623418,0.0012573511,0.0029077746,0.0010457949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.915113,0.06547141,0.0073364186,0.0020970576,0.009046032,0.00093615236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031802304,0.00038690752,0.00057995354,0.0012020362,0.0043102656,0.0027754307,0.0048226905,0.009444743,0.0011460902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09488754,0.0003343809,0.0011237186,0.0029464823,0.011214605,0.004131209,0.0031329005,0.010966267,0.00033692966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008461462,0.000048113798,0.051716417,0.0010422233,0.00010363899,0.0034613886,0.12549686,0.00069022516,0.000506701,0.06708272,0.704843,0.04492404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059102847,0.00018059224,0.10325861,0.003365362,0.00020149439,0.0029365853,0.1740759,0.0020720891,0.0016232249,0.048109088,0.663688,0.0004300798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13020587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15037479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13020587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053209634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009952225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.258896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123976249","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3318798","title":"Great Depression and the Rise of Female Employment: A New Hypothesis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Great Depression; Depression (economics); Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics; Political science; Keynesian economics; Law","score_opus":0.012783035792721208,"score_gpt":0.25047341275851914,"score_spread":0.23769037696579792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123976249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9121582,0.0052173976,0.0005719459,0.055232417,0.00029965123,0.000022581433,0.00021363705,0.000012079688,0.026271962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957552,0.0013835682,0.00007419417,0.001433585,0.0004192589,0.0000073494766,0.00003446561,0.0000018507789,0.0008906363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971694,0.00007070977,0.000010871301,0.00005358927,0.000027964084,0.00011987486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776506,0.0010287204,0.0004878066,0.00011663095,0.000080654645,0.00052114006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008698472,0.00013812719,0.0002581186,0.000719157,0.00071623374,0.0014308834,0.0005696301,0.002087532,0.011954986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037880964,0.00016433316,0.0003078129,0.00079781405,0.0030763408,0.0014333151,0.0010858931,0.0011942026,0.00035151283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001971076,0.0006205893,0.82561237,0.00022246272,0.00012362942,0.0023295681,0.0070001045,0.0003564851,0.0016461436,0.103839226,0.0048782625,0.0514001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030706875,0.00046503672,0.90481734,0.00021646418,0.000088580215,0.001255479,0.018318806,0.00095308654,0.00033085316,0.061392114,0.011823599,0.000031509306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004865676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005672272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011954986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057760376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009555657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039993465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123991929","doi":"10.1111/cdev.13505","title":"Children in the United States and Peru Pay to Correct Gender-Based Inequality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Child Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Inequality; Child development; Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.032283415615760966,"score_gpt":0.28528209823851103,"score_spread":0.25299868262275005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123991929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989458,0.00007973529,0.00003437365,0.00007141975,0.0000014566209,0.0000041895323,0.000022155295,0.0000012901783,0.0008396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992723,0.00011454908,0.00016837593,0.000032173564,0.0000010764132,0.0000214391,0.00003212714,7.38161e-7,0.00035721855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966943,0.000118902986,0.000009976687,0.00004763071,0.000040081166,0.000114004346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993249,0.00021146264,0.0002745957,0.000044165437,0.000067244204,0.000077670746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009334774,0.00015440783,0.00017604328,0.00029113734,0.0008372798,0.00050888554,0.00030453198,0.0003333617,0.0018464318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027918464,0.00012909019,0.00016998047,0.00021991857,0.0005181847,0.00037197894,0.0010505784,0.00047108682,0.00008898516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019102264,0.00061022904,0.8925279,0.00008040218,0.00003591469,0.00033328254,0.045592334,0.00021351637,0.0024540897,0.002213343,0.0007672813,0.0549808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024837316,0.0005248291,0.9619167,0.00006227349,0.000032268446,0.00019699559,0.030826315,0.00020437839,0.0009681929,0.00047001988,0.0047622495,0.0000109873945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0139821395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042309858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0139821395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006690762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059484155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027801514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124094117","doi":"","title":"Market work, housework and childcare: A time use approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Fertility; Economics; Baby boom; Work (physics); Matching (statistics); Labour economics; Time allocation; Production (economics); Demographic economics; Wage; Population; Psychology; Medicine; Microeconomics; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.03786155465390714,"score_gpt":0.2707031242560628,"score_spread":0.23284156960215566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124094117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.759181,0.010441984,0.12677369,0.012582392,0.00035295947,0.00025511393,0.0033182276,0.000116783056,0.08697788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630854,0.0036580155,0.009986834,0.00035067266,0.0002683651,0.00025748363,0.0005274074,0.00004185864,0.021823859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995745,0.00020225238,0.00001636014,0.00008466352,0.00005445247,0.00006778283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992073,0.00043065954,0.00014718549,0.00005532109,0.000039518483,0.000119934586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007761373,0.00068088423,0.00061739335,0.0018331638,0.00073491177,0.0023767948,0.0012513829,0.001182477,0.0141501585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011909441,0.00034344516,0.0011478345,0.0023136078,0.0013017333,0.0015148332,0.0014731578,0.0010304751,0.0006967577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041605078,0.0012661108,0.31505764,0.0004953761,0.00069099426,0.0012440436,0.0056270575,0.05429048,0.0027316182,0.5220799,0.009584065,0.08651671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001677689,0.00073106657,0.37060267,0.0003993262,0.0005797282,0.0005621095,0.010366336,0.19420178,0.0012996058,0.31568313,0.10526736,0.00013906328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02104477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021145815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02104477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001996897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012769605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047337055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124142868","doi":"","title":"WORKING WOMEN, MEN'S HOME TIME AND LOWEST-LOW FERTILITY","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Externality; Economics; Demographic economics; Negative correlation; Positive correlation; Labour economics; Time-use survey; Demography; Sociology; Population; Medicine; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.013992946931944014,"score_gpt":0.2411889396493168,"score_spread":0.22719599271737279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124142868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99745005,0.00027765584,0.00014047718,0.00038095337,0.000004037207,0.000001775332,0.00013599006,0.0000030405404,0.0016060624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992298,0.00015754803,0.000044531836,0.000022007509,0.0000059446547,0.000001963486,0.00006872859,9.95296e-7,0.00046847356],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998388,0.000056393023,0.000005641494,0.000026919275,0.0000145819085,0.000057654142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998628,0.00045921985,0.00054171437,0.000061666535,0.00003236617,0.00027702653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000628365,0.00014147245,0.00023852578,0.0005886699,0.00043905582,0.00094409543,0.0001982377,0.00041776334,0.0053537986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002063197,0.00015350134,0.00033084245,0.00091062544,0.0006188815,0.00045447962,0.00057467824,0.00032807188,0.00023982562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010056911,0.000056226327,0.9838749,0.000022881915,0.00008235678,0.00024070143,0.00091681845,0.0014326404,0.00017723363,0.005175438,0.0006607514,0.007259413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018491506,0.00006627547,0.9905757,0.000030014273,0.000051413906,0.00018164596,0.0024526836,0.0017876654,0.000102521575,0.0035469425,0.0011788082,0.000007825936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012833797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016215699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012833797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000389704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038041855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025518179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124162369","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00403.x","title":"DOUBLE MAJORS: ONE FOR ME, ONE FOR THE PARENTS?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coursework; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Field (mathematics); Sample (material); Graduation (instrument); Mathematics education; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15510585630722834,"score_gpt":0.3210667590808268,"score_spread":0.16596090277359848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124162369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8459107,0.0038795334,0.0021882236,0.1130396,0.0010912983,0.00003078863,0.0018653815,0.000084977226,0.031909548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96615654,0.0022347579,0.0003961588,0.005010055,0.00033188562,0.00001752548,0.00054815365,0.000016163549,0.025288748],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968207,0.00012656726,0.000010031519,0.00004923951,0.000058108413,0.000073956246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836,0.00036929295,0.00051045354,0.000058745703,0.000121860045,0.0005796337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005923412,0.00014007816,0.00019915805,0.00029120067,0.0007313381,0.0018562839,0.0002644783,0.0010740868,0.02626949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034614822,0.00012252717,0.00012697157,0.00060391164,0.00066502346,0.0013226211,0.00064471003,0.0010207648,0.0035556331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017650989,0.00022414738,0.49493024,0.00015495186,0.000032405205,0.0013384982,0.0040842863,0.00043066023,0.00065372133,0.04319763,0.26878276,0.18599421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010096047,0.0004080905,0.48663116,0.0004081528,0.000053247702,0.003895689,0.07537939,0.003718945,0.0005859077,0.04640593,0.38233617,0.00007642388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059505696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008154227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02626949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000492447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057095557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087880194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124167215","doi":"","title":"Collective Choice and Individual Action: Education Policy and Social Mobility in England","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Inefficiency; Lottery; Action (physics); Voting; School choice; Cash; Economics; Microeconomics; State (computer science); Class (philosophy); Public economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.034020175211274345,"score_gpt":0.3327722044985233,"score_spread":0.298752029287249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124167215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90341145,0.0052708583,0.0008964916,0.02201583,0.000057717603,0.000028292894,0.00017943225,0.000009295563,0.06813063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98949695,0.00047103356,0.00008462008,0.00014502845,0.000011058669,0.000012653738,0.000017777926,0.0000018488823,0.009758991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977921,0.0009777904,0.000078397396,0.00017857896,0.00018395974,0.0007890659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969528,0.0016420699,0.0005671095,0.0001312513,0.00017476332,0.0005319842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016462214,0.00010845462,0.00044267144,0.00072846265,0.0031637482,0.0035151846,0.00058256596,0.0014701162,0.008198302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004044964,0.00018264835,0.00022022596,0.0012461186,0.004610721,0.0021990342,0.0031734896,0.001038543,0.000309667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003691293,0.0001822733,0.06535464,0.00028834902,0.000043504206,0.0020272764,0.086613536,0.0077024964,0.0004108701,0.7874801,0.0071464665,0.04238136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019560193,0.000374945,0.3393158,0.0008830872,0.000046564386,0.00079560466,0.15241298,0.008148938,0.00037086278,0.2551253,0.24218154,0.00014868198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2587269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31910074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2587269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019044975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004534657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51444185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124196631","doi":"","title":"The Pitfalls of Work Requirements in Welfare-to-Work Policies: Experimental Evidence on Human Capital Accumulation in the Self-Sufficiency Project","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Queen's University","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Human capital; Work (physics); Labour economics; Population; Economics; Baseline (sea); Welfare reform; Business; Demographic economics; Political science; Accounting; Economic growth; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.1374305299044338,"score_gpt":0.4352212272763583,"score_spread":0.29779069737192454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124196631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971317,0.00006624596,0.00050649315,0.00023263069,0.0000133768,0.00007105615,0.000037453996,0.0000048527877,0.0019360885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998355,0.00008852418,0.0005242279,0.00010326573,0.00001292367,0.0002113259,0.000034144185,0.0000028541608,0.0006676726],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99496126,0.00369568,0.0002089383,0.00041876105,0.0003587396,0.00035652576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9620545,0.02455339,0.0086203795,0.0033301592,0.00039640523,0.0010452829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009701465,0.0004821208,0.00052278413,0.00037638162,0.00081170344,0.0010985065,0.0009005591,0.0012430749,0.005343038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021846106,0.0004081637,0.0004516065,0.00038042944,0.0029445132,0.0010796551,0.0018267315,0.0013331661,0.00036171262],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11650846,0.29558855,0.17085968,0.0020270476,0.002279785,0.0008722934,0.0082303975,0.04591172,0.054514788,0.07070658,0.0036995176,0.22880122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02980021,0.26660025,0.49348894,0.00082767225,0.0015577626,0.0003818381,0.008477333,0.03342045,0.048542805,0.099339,0.01726778,0.00029595863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011425633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010917473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009701465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068570505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011960759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051306844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124214132","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3323182","title":"What Drives Female Labor Force Participation? Comparable Micro-Level Evidence from Eight Developing and Emerging Economies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Tanzania; Economics; Demographic economics; Developing country; Work (physics); Development economics; Geography; Economic growth; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.04856490085528397,"score_gpt":0.3246315272365211,"score_spread":0.27606662638123713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124214132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968534,0.0003887248,0.0000627974,0.000314977,0.0000034462794,0.0000046255814,0.00035548897,7.885208e-7,0.0020157758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991252,0.0002616613,0.000017804628,0.00003382016,0.0000039456586,0.000004436904,0.00017717016,6.5510653e-7,0.0003753122],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963284,0.00011204626,0.000017630435,0.00005555766,0.000038597092,0.0001433483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983072,0.0007758794,0.000550978,0.0000674533,0.00013082512,0.00016766717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007088546,0.00017147456,0.0002577266,0.0009168167,0.0005437689,0.0008056854,0.00027021728,0.00031756633,0.004384105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022608032,0.00014798486,0.00022673619,0.0015962298,0.0007048344,0.0006196331,0.00086165,0.0004863592,0.0003654177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011026251,0.00004586879,0.9876351,0.00005841295,0.000068877314,0.00018655245,0.0031340835,0.00015217577,0.00021752858,0.0013498062,0.00044216085,0.00659915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057074008,0.00002996585,0.99046224,0.00003443471,0.000018356754,0.000033544,0.008051114,0.00007771535,0.00006256311,0.00020514788,0.001016644,0.0000025874178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029025542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05045233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029025542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003660444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043180666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05771321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124280767","doi":"","title":"Patronage Politics and the Development of the Welfare State: Confederate Pensions in the American South","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Download; Politics; Legislature; Democracy; State (computer science); Pension; Cash transfers; Political science; Census; Developing country; Welfare; Public administration; Cash; Economic growth; Economics; Sociology; Law; Finance; Voting; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.018382901765929542,"score_gpt":0.26975991358624607,"score_spread":0.2513770118203165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124280767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9621096,0.00034088214,0.00010479625,0.003904759,0.000012910687,0.000004151359,0.0000144656415,0.0000024165638,0.033505898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976447,0.00012076048,0.000023002613,0.000130713,0.0000054799225,0.0000025766974,0.0000043705086,0.0000015402459,0.0020668076],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992229,0.00030512683,0.000012149561,0.00005833797,0.000057650177,0.00034384907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944,0.00012632513,0.00014104646,0.000019869514,0.00004002915,0.0002327087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012517095,0.00008440006,0.00015048932,0.0010040896,0.0063906065,0.0024083252,0.00031492996,0.00060062425,0.0049640606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016369208,0.00013292338,0.000113631344,0.00088586356,0.006751117,0.0014844256,0.0035112195,0.0011794784,0.00022533661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016411066,0.000112584516,0.17002155,0.00004881658,0.000011049642,0.0008872463,0.49115172,0.00016904308,0.0016954091,0.30144504,0.0034619225,0.030831542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024142802,0.000073845345,0.31929857,0.00020725623,0.000014062644,0.00034794942,0.56484807,0.00032964058,0.00067623536,0.025652908,0.08849929,0.000028082795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034020822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.097689696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034020822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038626331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026041153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06764555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124320315","doi":"10.1111/ecca.2015.82.issue-328","title":"Take-up of Free School Meals: price effects and peer effects","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peer effects; Entitlement (fair division); Instrumental variable; Quarter (Canadian coin); Welfare; Point (geometry); Peer group; Identification (biology); School choice; Fixed effects model; Psychology; Economics; Demographic economics; Panel data; Social psychology; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.030450078697050017,"score_gpt":0.33163912991562683,"score_spread":0.3011890512185768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124320315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639769,0.0020463623,0.010978241,0.003310376,0.00019671801,0.00019863012,0.0067737456,0.0001293902,0.012389641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840642,0.00059008517,0.0013716929,0.00023581313,0.00011426539,0.000100365476,0.0038163548,0.000044100896,0.00966318],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959486,0.0023317859,0.0002075416,0.00064283516,0.00040822473,0.00046110767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686974,0.022982745,0.0049512633,0.002059038,0.0006719726,0.00063758413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064936536,0.00040070064,0.0010435535,0.00074906554,0.00081935996,0.002124861,0.0014457881,0.001596163,0.016142214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021639353,0.00044841046,0.0020873186,0.0016626369,0.001505198,0.0014328463,0.0018284259,0.0024922595,0.0010340756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015252982,0.0011388108,0.8848709,0.00037702327,0.002580934,0.0012617521,0.0013782169,0.019015467,0.00066469656,0.027125038,0.016883023,0.043178666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040510207,0.0005596999,0.91020465,0.00014051082,0.0016069742,0.00030298714,0.0020127206,0.03938809,0.0020251847,0.017670114,0.025570247,0.000113707545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03508543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030949233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03508543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008866721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066673756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06976247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124329310","doi":"","title":"Migration Responses to Conflict: Evidence from the Border of the American Civil War","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Spanish Civil War; Relocation; Download; Destinations; State (computer science); Soviet union; Political science; Developing country; Demographic economics; World War II; Development economics; Political economy; Economic growth; Law; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.019357900259369364,"score_gpt":0.30969652706406425,"score_spread":0.2903386268046949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124329310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99696845,0.00048930873,0.000039998384,0.00037356923,0.000013795875,0.0000033923484,0.00050299783,9.799936e-7,0.0016075805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998135,0.0004663017,0.000045774446,0.00011794925,0.00001496432,0.000010063811,0.00067374384,0.0000037533982,0.00053249265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989454,0.0005006698,0.000050541013,0.00018312066,0.00008365897,0.00023660585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946332,0.0015611218,0.0021392081,0.00044354767,0.00047718376,0.0007456668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014170787,0.00020002338,0.00035386477,0.001074817,0.002383313,0.0021186965,0.0008789309,0.00073873193,0.0058024167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008885819,0.0002621006,0.00022541269,0.0022058287,0.001173716,0.0012264819,0.0025412163,0.00093786174,0.00059299584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024052887,0.00008629658,0.98010373,0.000031331485,0.000077983736,0.00017439405,0.011068862,0.00008687228,0.00007936394,0.0005915591,0.0019501671,0.005508973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000138142095,0.00004997789,0.95983326,0.00010191814,0.000024046294,0.00008213874,0.03618134,0.00012026266,0.00004164089,0.00026820297,0.0032735565,0.000009771184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0940287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14902155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0940287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073806976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007039151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18696278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124340566","doi":"","title":"Household Responses to Individual Shocks: Disability and Labor Supply","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Human capital; Odds; British Household Panel Survey; Labour supply; Labour economics; Linkage (software); Exploit; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.02468034389849458,"score_gpt":0.2745973226404763,"score_spread":0.24991697874198174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124340566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99675924,0.0001537415,0.00073667,0.0003376079,0.000005168364,0.000017193854,0.0010014937,0.0000061784817,0.0009828205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989924,0.0000782364,0.00008426272,0.0000392986,0.0000028258212,0.00000538558,0.00046028575,0.0000011657979,0.00033607017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999416,0.00016840015,0.000038063892,0.00010441056,0.00008090907,0.00019227351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973852,0.00084814476,0.0009159579,0.0003275543,0.00020903145,0.00031404875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014526588,0.00013794976,0.0004222343,0.0008194084,0.00040280705,0.0010944173,0.00043514022,0.00084152864,0.0024175628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072620627,0.00018625116,0.00037303133,0.0016529134,0.00058013236,0.0006701404,0.0006866555,0.00045690895,0.00031828342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059724254,0.000038053953,0.9890725,0.0000133249605,0.00008132823,0.000049444065,0.00094481994,0.0021726156,0.00018763101,0.0006632909,0.00024980312,0.006467418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003393234,0.000028546265,0.99349254,0.000010898997,0.00001792183,0.00002732586,0.001391545,0.0032460587,0.000072169416,0.0012374291,0.00046043535,0.000011633098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16030394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16342455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16030394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011442129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063371524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31874174},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3124361241","doi":"","title":"Marriage, Labor Supply, and Home Production","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Matching (statistics); Production (economics); Marriage market; Sorting; Labour economics; Wage; Identification (biology); Panel data; Estimator; Nonparametric statistics; Microeconomics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.028803681864225807,"score_gpt":0.32412137023670057,"score_spread":0.29531768837247474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124361241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78244007,0.0015937854,0.18286993,0.0025963923,0.00006664437,0.00020027271,0.0025488336,0.00016387425,0.02752014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97438455,0.0008370008,0.007518473,0.00013240219,0.000062868756,0.00010539446,0.0004736312,0.000018223618,0.016467508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995074,0.00015864962,0.000023600802,0.00011584826,0.000083891755,0.00011060372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984883,0.00063543743,0.0005238768,0.00016648635,0.00006557669,0.00012026791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011564316,0.0003075463,0.00091449474,0.0008243906,0.00063120766,0.0013935687,0.0011263539,0.0010238439,0.018129414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059374375,0.0003171385,0.0007448785,0.0018065759,0.0007423964,0.0013304113,0.0012242799,0.0007180756,0.0013159228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027089342,0.0006526626,0.19584703,0.00028290667,0.00024663267,0.0006173884,0.0017253809,0.15898404,0.0024135143,0.5024779,0.00562558,0.1308561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015360357,0.00035502983,0.11587935,0.000102610604,0.00013034313,0.00046755106,0.0013508288,0.33601078,0.0010785066,0.5273859,0.017009296,0.00007622712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01023987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009693359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018129414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009454442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001028637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06064892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124370547","doi":"10.1111/caje.12181","title":"Estimating labour supply responses and welfare participation: Using a natural experiment to validate a structural labour supply model","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Labour supply; Economics; Labour economics; Work (physics); Replicate; Welfare reform; Market economy","score_opus":0.16090830545062967,"score_gpt":0.27459855597697524,"score_spread":0.11369025052634557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124370547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847531,0.000025055231,0.012025595,0.00015952092,0.000014075771,0.0006323119,0.00079784193,0.000029660618,0.0015629868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98616076,0.000031457905,0.010052504,0.00012189354,0.000010558785,0.0016554402,0.00081322686,0.000008825241,0.0011453358],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936288,0.0052375905,0.00012552115,0.0005086701,0.00026103735,0.00023831091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.948335,0.0423822,0.0036225494,0.0036700042,0.0016027169,0.0003875275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012179053,0.00063826126,0.0005289614,0.00039027206,0.00089532346,0.0007549001,0.0011685047,0.0012168927,0.0033554973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026510391,0.00040619576,0.0006173401,0.0007326922,0.0013300121,0.00068467716,0.0005951608,0.0010084666,0.00043273976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00933972,0.033492107,0.50518423,0.0006526219,0.0013674195,0.00035441242,0.007222612,0.3316352,0.0122857345,0.035041824,0.005289783,0.058134366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031117934,0.017674297,0.36479995,0.000089014655,0.00052706024,0.000072978226,0.0041510467,0.56193024,0.009570535,0.026113003,0.011726584,0.00023355216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13043928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1254791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8695607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004574863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028315051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25936007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124404855","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2199586","title":"Fighting Poverty: Assessing the Effect of a Guaranteed Minimum Income Proposals in Québec","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Economics; Public economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.006477685947448831,"score_gpt":0.2728562473051397,"score_spread":0.26637856135769084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124404855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910597,0.00023276299,0.00014003289,0.001970838,0.000028111526,0.00012440111,0.00048463818,0.000012364007,0.0059471484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99595404,0.00012030006,0.00015482494,0.00040931732,0.000009589011,0.00010082091,0.0001959834,0.0000050265326,0.0030501497],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99276394,0.0032670025,0.00013485538,0.00027561703,0.0006890427,0.0028696738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864114,0.0046488065,0.001880191,0.00038840916,0.0029059823,0.0037653036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040057763,0.00042637714,0.00069473207,0.00086719065,0.005131372,0.0025627387,0.00249807,0.0026168071,0.0053309384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012840118,0.00026416025,0.0008281664,0.0016924862,0.0028260062,0.0010917,0.0020954222,0.0024564643,0.00029308518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008053147,0.008911242,0.8173479,0.00045006676,0.0010778495,0.0012039519,0.011683851,0.030044118,0.0020288024,0.014681277,0.02394673,0.080571115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006920871,0.0028765826,0.93926454,0.00019269585,0.00027466335,0.00005092311,0.030863669,0.013419634,0.0006050335,0.0009805998,0.010669323,0.00011024669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98724467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06328684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06328684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054329626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4591803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124422129","doi":"","title":"Are Women Pawns in the Political Game? Evidence from Elections to the Spanish Senate","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; NOMINATE; Nomination; Politics; Political science; Order (exchange); Competition (biology); Secret ballot; Political economy; Law; Voting; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06367944580439737,"score_gpt":0.36422383710214445,"score_spread":0.30054439129774707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124422129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690127,0.0011974274,0.00037887355,0.0020169097,0.000048040372,0.000021075113,0.000530628,0.000004573283,0.026789801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99552345,0.00042810576,0.00006466438,0.00030277096,0.00004436522,0.00001325898,0.00030541405,0.000006364665,0.003311633],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971827,0.0015660252,0.00010658226,0.00028102467,0.0002769846,0.0005866035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98424584,0.009270975,0.0038312185,0.00071918324,0.0010508888,0.00088181574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055394233,0.000272776,0.0006680842,0.0008568648,0.0014232559,0.0019453568,0.0005946454,0.0009366455,0.012508515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01709042,0.00026160004,0.00025983466,0.0012492036,0.0017152505,0.000924919,0.0010479875,0.0009434494,0.0020681513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048644883,0.00086066104,0.8874909,0.0004979986,0.00038528568,0.001070996,0.015227514,0.0009493106,0.0012628996,0.013438855,0.017172579,0.056778535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002675039,0.00038046524,0.9308777,0.000111669506,0.00009421118,0.00018068055,0.029665913,0.0007724598,0.00042040707,0.004824643,0.03235533,0.000049112965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037171863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05501581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037171863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007859512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000599982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07391101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124477828","doi":"10.1257/jep.26.2.141","title":"Why is the Teen Birth Rate in the United States So High and Why Does It Matter?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"The Journal of Economic Perspectives","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Birth rate; Demographic economics; Face (sociological concept); Economics; Demography; Fertility; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.021897951628444844,"score_gpt":0.27992546455955586,"score_spread":0.25802751293111104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124477828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5248413,0.107306086,0.0018759847,0.31727877,0.007699812,0.000056334688,0.008346612,0.00013701744,0.03245802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9380126,0.04051702,0.0006678814,0.014863043,0.0030728304,0.000036607475,0.002000346,0.000038540104,0.0007911669],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968887,0.0013677608,0.0003366898,0.0004738667,0.0006207932,0.00031220325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864652,0.004519947,0.0043688607,0.0005973586,0.0028182315,0.0012305626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004678435,0.00019153683,0.00038235896,0.0018753454,0.0012496082,0.002872173,0.00052931195,0.0015213774,0.0015629994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0126196,0.0002573161,0.0005660993,0.004804036,0.0019363142,0.002288708,0.00092613464,0.0021605408,0.0003975082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053046333,0.000042151732,0.9154562,0.0003672606,0.00024529098,0.00019064463,0.0032270167,0.00018251737,0.00014841855,0.0051243287,0.025763746,0.049199384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006622493,0.00005821648,0.96191514,0.00090565294,0.00013987774,0.00025703295,0.0101902485,0.0001710588,0.00020051394,0.0014643475,0.024651833,0.00003958322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04707687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062179193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04707687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015729878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016915343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0936057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124522969","doi":"10.1111/caje.12250","title":"Male wage inequality and marital dissolution: Is there a link?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Remarriage; Economics; Inequality; Wage; Wage dispersion; Demographic economics; Wage inequality; Labour economics; Dispersion (optics); Economic inequality; Efficiency wage; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13028037066979312,"score_gpt":0.23098499274901405,"score_spread":0.10070462207922093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124522969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97534186,0.005120692,0.00080177747,0.0070111947,0.000039172282,0.0000065206177,0.00019077932,0.0000034369205,0.011484599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883443,0.00062598573,0.000038243885,0.00005611401,0.000059432234,0.0000012400463,0.000020693848,5.9026047e-7,0.0003633394],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997148,0.000109365144,0.0000114935,0.000032199907,0.000053795662,0.00007848496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970994,0.0011758541,0.001133412,0.00009181784,0.00015157677,0.0003480261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067794166,0.00007163243,0.00022165952,0.0006104512,0.00050210976,0.00084613066,0.0003412988,0.00038264357,0.00870261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048344657,0.00008527572,0.00013431675,0.0008442835,0.00088453933,0.0005766302,0.0008079604,0.00057432614,0.00019554285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022106245,0.00011605239,0.92570066,0.00006376989,0.00007079919,0.00033205442,0.0017746924,0.0005863136,0.00022692222,0.037403535,0.001107301,0.03239692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008421572,0.000090176014,0.9772044,0.000092600334,0.000025473571,0.00030187026,0.0033179598,0.0013979088,0.00014194948,0.014056451,0.0033537284,0.00000909166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066067935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063002077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00870261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046589758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030701925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029113114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124569993","doi":"","title":"Distributional Impacts of the Self-Sufficiency Project","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Subsidy; Receipt; Economics; Distribution (mathematics); Transfer payment; Welfare; Quantile; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Counterfactual thinking; Demographic economics; Sample (material); Labour economics; Survey data collection; Econometrics; Statistics; Accounting","score_opus":0.009036842931010581,"score_gpt":0.27413218282201995,"score_spread":0.26509533989100936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124569993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96691084,0.00043671843,0.0043466045,0.0028005892,0.000050183382,0.00023770434,0.0009841067,0.00008773698,0.024145523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820185,0.0000759901,0.00053591194,0.00019912799,0.000012848965,0.000085909815,0.00015349837,0.0000070638343,0.0007277227],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837015,0.010223975,0.00046454332,0.00094919873,0.003115528,0.0015453502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778766,0.011482041,0.0042394274,0.003147556,0.0021963825,0.0010580492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010571317,0.00025935378,0.0007396265,0.0010935976,0.0012851077,0.0012785017,0.00096799346,0.00085176405,0.009464018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03691033,0.00018998224,0.00055953383,0.001579588,0.0036580472,0.0011811053,0.00354942,0.0013258928,0.00024028908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007077738,0.007861897,0.29724336,0.0005745108,0.0010411383,0.00071245746,0.0041169142,0.055428952,0.004745042,0.25358894,0.017512586,0.35009646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009936068,0.0060073063,0.8084768,0.00019108383,0.00035473847,0.00029451906,0.005317625,0.02331437,0.005832382,0.12492213,0.02417123,0.00012425432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015366734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014081788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015366734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035461157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030651472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05590713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124582920","doi":"","title":"The effect of universal child benefits on labour supply","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour supply; Flexibility (engineering); Economics; Child labour; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Child care; Significant difference; Medicine; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.01647541230272433,"score_gpt":0.2932998371508636,"score_spread":0.2768244248481393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124582920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820503,0.0015082865,0.00064322655,0.0013946815,0.000058850754,0.000053828742,0.001882155,0.00003768047,0.012370873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99432963,0.0004892059,0.00016900667,0.00019031961,0.000025768017,0.000014483593,0.00046989252,0.0000061926985,0.004305627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824417,0.00037800355,0.00004069306,0.00018233643,0.00033906277,0.00081572373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951865,0.0026982313,0.00095168,0.00021817864,0.00039960988,0.0005458751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016920407,0.00028229176,0.0006656709,0.0006797418,0.00062815513,0.00086694286,0.0007924164,0.00065169786,0.013475158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00974292,0.00017863186,0.000949526,0.0012067943,0.0008089003,0.0004250651,0.0014352642,0.0011227883,0.00050352607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028384132,0.0010606952,0.80559695,0.00060131826,0.0009873762,0.0014427544,0.0017902842,0.04215807,0.0038868906,0.024403086,0.0067783087,0.10845588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013395482,0.00079195754,0.9730647,0.00011137965,0.00042329432,0.0001368644,0.002162512,0.009583733,0.0014886083,0.0039622015,0.00810232,0.00003839136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.387737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3770496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.387737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005234413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030413882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7709603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124597921","doi":"","title":"Bundling services and household welfare in developing countries - the case of Peru","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Consumption (sociology); Panel data; Social Welfare; Developing country; Economics; Business; Econometrics; Economic growth; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.042625119054510226,"score_gpt":0.3218792641668015,"score_spread":0.2792541451122913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124597921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909202,0.0015226512,0.0005186338,0.0015338369,0.0000044440453,0.000016031225,0.00066101603,0.00001677421,0.004806509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99740607,0.0009783956,0.0002992122,0.000055682925,0.0000070395686,0.00002425819,0.00047512763,0.0000028721768,0.0007513479],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933654,0.00034279158,0.000021476393,0.000058769467,0.00004425276,0.00019627056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777657,0.0006565615,0.00096279854,0.00013145502,0.00026260718,0.0002098995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009843811,0.00029196765,0.00043420916,0.0014868157,0.0009001851,0.0012164448,0.00042163316,0.0005243339,0.0029424042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003920674,0.00024017505,0.00054828165,0.004740032,0.0008176168,0.0011391394,0.0024472019,0.0006759124,0.00016573176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042424022,0.00034776333,0.93106925,0.000235889,0.0007566207,0.0010225623,0.0053803497,0.005963137,0.00045221744,0.0166569,0.0030660986,0.03462511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009335782,0.000255741,0.9573495,0.00025384038,0.0005101375,0.00036443403,0.013586572,0.0070643886,0.0003166134,0.0077431006,0.012423574,0.0000388931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0895013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1260663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0895013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002386502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008087969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1779607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124645842","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3442406","title":"The Effect of Paid Parental Leave on Breastfeeding, Parental Health and Behavior","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parental leave; Breastfeeding; Developmental psychology; Psychology; Environmental health; Medicine; Pediatrics; Engineering","score_opus":0.006839277656605386,"score_gpt":0.2763797388718582,"score_spread":0.26954046121525277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124645842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99817014,0.0005772135,0.000019232459,0.00034398673,0.000029819394,0.0000031031827,0.00008858827,0.0000017936686,0.0007660332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989655,0.00015263332,0.000022658958,0.000048272632,0.000022887869,0.000004314729,0.00005150527,0.000001797863,0.0007304705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884146,0.0005625691,0.0000455872,0.00008092018,0.00008905178,0.0003803826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99295735,0.003217011,0.0007946047,0.00024698715,0.00016824053,0.0026158805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015975541,0.0002338739,0.00039107964,0.00043119045,0.0010878236,0.0008122787,0.00046562587,0.0010527867,0.005831498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068896995,0.00026211684,0.00083520485,0.00036713041,0.0006359472,0.0005355533,0.0008377574,0.001378104,0.00026464756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044767037,0.0018781624,0.9768827,0.00002803776,0.00021473684,0.00026395833,0.0013067989,0.000121029196,0.00036251862,0.0002650622,0.00028674243,0.013913555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033931003,0.0007084654,0.99726033,0.000017844712,0.000057294383,0.000057840083,0.0013363581,0.00011215748,0.00004748639,0.00009488211,0.00026737942,0.0000059748645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019120535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034263585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019120535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008928338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016877017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038018525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124658769","doi":"","title":"Intergenerational Effects of Disability Benefits - Evidence from Canadian Social Assistance Programs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Scholar Works  (Boise State University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Anxiety; Developmental psychology; Cognitive skill; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.02217231089873427,"score_gpt":0.24320527341412118,"score_spread":0.2210329625153869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124658769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92252016,0.03279922,0.00025130174,0.0055141794,0.00011830781,0.00010406105,0.0070939385,0.000021919419,0.031576905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98727524,0.009054624,0.00015835186,0.00031200977,0.000020362071,0.000038659295,0.0009793912,0.000008716124,0.002152736],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951487,0.001125007,0.00018814924,0.0005840109,0.0014841274,0.001470059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891236,0.0029159405,0.0028493574,0.00087683013,0.0027290722,0.0015051372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045473226,0.0005625115,0.000787329,0.00288486,0.0039013175,0.00221915,0.0017366648,0.0007887302,0.0070123067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015593261,0.00029347997,0.0012664438,0.0050261957,0.0017050479,0.00074909907,0.0033939856,0.0010303712,0.00025545125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049209164,0.00026094317,0.9237245,0.0003315183,0.00089756766,0.0003720641,0.0056928005,0.0005888363,0.000106654734,0.0029103598,0.003974609,0.06064808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029698132,0.000050963656,0.98994267,0.00044440632,0.00040386897,0.00006023403,0.0034093107,0.00019301708,0.00007542024,0.000322303,0.0050451285,0.000022948805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98040515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9869328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028604535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028604535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027328638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2075414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124659787","doi":"10.3386/w11587","title":"The Intergenerational Effect of Worker Displacement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Displacement (psychology); Labour economics; Demographic economics; Business; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.20038900968603224,"score_gpt":0.5172078110780696,"score_spread":0.31681880139203733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124659787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937313,0.0008112365,0.0010450422,0.0003059667,0.000020295238,0.000032003092,0.001103128,0.000013732863,0.0029373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982817,0.00022496727,0.00015532153,0.000031127263,0.000005364613,0.000010453188,0.0003877833,0.0000022190845,0.00090109115],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981863,0.00062837935,0.00007825846,0.00040398096,0.00025479562,0.00044825068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946785,0.0019260059,0.0020506096,0.00079660595,0.0002508819,0.00029732616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016816348,0.00021804821,0.00034745128,0.000935996,0.00082474574,0.0009315934,0.0005450444,0.00039018295,0.004685762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073747598,0.00025348968,0.00041900735,0.0012944365,0.0009584754,0.00054490985,0.0020162056,0.0006898232,0.00026845545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010372183,0.0000551069,0.9850306,0.000016331987,0.00019647836,0.00017360385,0.00096632144,0.0008454493,0.00031871765,0.0018332767,0.00043918382,0.010021228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004890511,0.000040176394,0.9962274,0.00001242235,0.00004239561,0.00007496753,0.0009856152,0.0005865103,0.00014753094,0.00060502684,0.0012640201,0.000009112355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061482303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09661876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061482303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013691293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006883715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12224889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124679790","doi":"","title":"How's Life at Home? New Evidence on Marriage and the Set Point for Happiness","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Set point; Set (abstract data type); Point (geometry); Psychology; Demographic economics; Economics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.021533807920035883,"score_gpt":0.27131509477105964,"score_spread":0.24978128685102374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124679790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70281845,0.15440886,0.0038839234,0.053660028,0.0006804725,0.000022093382,0.0011868466,0.000017731127,0.083321474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9544386,0.039972227,0.0006328305,0.0018133784,0.0005890702,0.0000143626685,0.00044467958,0.000010494173,0.0020844326],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991335,0.0004786144,0.00004589572,0.00013073614,0.000121628895,0.00008964453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818911,0.012374119,0.0033198495,0.0007852565,0.00082955166,0.00080005504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027567714,0.0002190123,0.00054264226,0.0013612146,0.0007206938,0.0021426936,0.0007808681,0.0007545901,0.013643726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012437963,0.00021765563,0.00051948975,0.002246267,0.0022435905,0.0023075202,0.001999317,0.0017422033,0.00064917275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009204298,0.0003297324,0.6466289,0.0010096072,0.0007308578,0.00069598324,0.008702669,0.00094498525,0.00032781667,0.1067473,0.0077496134,0.2252122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031223844,0.00018287801,0.92072517,0.0008510959,0.00024326234,0.00021781208,0.0087707015,0.0007380387,0.00012649385,0.037193224,0.03087588,0.00004431054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008214804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011963944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013643726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006964301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039945275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045642734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124687749","doi":"10.1920/wp.ifs.2009.0911","title":"New evidence on taxes and portfolio choice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Portfolio; Capital income; Gross income; Adjusted gross income; International taxation; Differential (mechanical device); Income tax; Labour economics; Distribution (mathematics); Double taxation; State income tax; Demographic economics; Tax reform; Public economics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.06542798997723168,"score_gpt":0.35959341932446093,"score_spread":0.2941654293472292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124687749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.517335,0.061230183,0.00912203,0.11801832,0.0014348655,0.000042463467,0.0039839647,0.00007934113,0.28875387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93517536,0.03766172,0.0012912649,0.005282251,0.0017481697,0.00003282254,0.0017211466,0.000052632156,0.017034624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980825,0.00083809317,0.00014669418,0.00026502414,0.00051332486,0.0001544232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9247191,0.056984413,0.008714662,0.004757082,0.0035729955,0.0012516924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004258882,0.0003734786,0.00064820086,0.0024351487,0.0007814923,0.0034639386,0.00076953456,0.001722359,0.040866572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038013272,0.0003010044,0.00065398536,0.0041856114,0.002694688,0.004260943,0.0017568065,0.0028700721,0.0027167525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013363968,0.0012340563,0.34267378,0.00093476236,0.00063229195,0.0008981967,0.0034599602,0.0025564963,0.00067186076,0.38745382,0.030726131,0.22742228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013489217,0.00019974327,0.54750496,0.0014476974,0.00031074072,0.00051072985,0.0048145405,0.0028527887,0.00082255097,0.3180855,0.123235315,0.0000806418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006890525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008046384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040866572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014664389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010724467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13671231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124723329","doi":"","title":"A Comparison of Micro and Macro Expenditure Measures Across Countries Using Differing Survey Methods","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Consumer Expenditure Survey; Data collection; Download; Developing country; Macro; Survey data collection; Economics; Demographic economics; Inequality; Aggregate expenditure; Geography; Business; Econometrics; Statistics; Public economics; Economic growth; Mathematics","score_opus":0.052227005192347416,"score_gpt":0.3996887313838558,"score_spread":0.3474617261915084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124723329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94324946,0.003775061,0.01774312,0.0004810787,0.000109641944,0.0003887927,0.011062995,0.0001190236,0.023070777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97348684,0.0023859616,0.014137656,0.00014288709,0.000058304544,0.0006154227,0.007670674,0.00006607841,0.001436186],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96266246,0.025754133,0.0028615035,0.0012813385,0.0062256395,0.0012149495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9402083,0.0291565,0.011987168,0.0060363915,0.011910842,0.000700896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026127575,0.00054330344,0.000826184,0.009912121,0.00042611768,0.002223718,0.00075465586,0.00045269824,0.001502362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07457968,0.00042236655,0.0009412922,0.019921148,0.0008600714,0.0017237401,0.0025337336,0.00047173162,0.00042930813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000583496,0.00008057402,0.90646535,0.0008113101,0.0013672062,0.00008937702,0.0032499342,0.0038838831,0.0005480499,0.0056940774,0.0018565947,0.075370155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001728167,0.00029032372,0.98720247,0.00021468503,0.00022305665,0.00012625918,0.0035491239,0.0009899695,0.0005938921,0.00047545138,0.00628301,0.000034413315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01250795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01594333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026127575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00127287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009743278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13817751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124740589","doi":"","title":"The Effect of Marginal Tax Rates on Taxable Income: A Panel Study of the 1988 Tax Flattening in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Taxable income; Economics; State income tax; Tax reform; Gross income; Adjusted gross income; Labour economics; Indirect tax; Income tax; Value-added tax; International taxation; Dividend tax; Ad valorem tax; Demographic economics; Public economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.024165762149340114,"score_gpt":0.30503239229094203,"score_spread":0.2808666301416019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124740589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868439,0.0006037441,0.00016543899,0.0010936544,0.000020436111,0.00006238885,0.008601746,0.000013557906,0.0025951378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98556453,0.0006470214,0.00032442567,0.00036837615,0.000013584033,0.00004873159,0.007721923,0.000019522113,0.0052918987],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979468,0.00036213617,0.00006139669,0.00028918817,0.00045138324,0.00088911323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99423546,0.00093185605,0.0007237587,0.0003796713,0.0024440303,0.0012851479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025632118,0.00060660706,0.0013488438,0.0016863878,0.005811476,0.002489114,0.0024349252,0.0015491343,0.004769868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005942562,0.0007015768,0.0011518685,0.0066848076,0.0011887687,0.000838499,0.0014295038,0.00259538,0.00076471386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013882238,0.0010190163,0.9315915,0.00010813988,0.0007511093,0.00043549258,0.012387935,0.0054766554,0.0008126042,0.0035316655,0.022834579,0.019663144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006418545,0.00006789143,0.98599446,0.0000414448,0.00013394005,0.000031957534,0.0055514676,0.0027699412,0.00014429777,0.00022795793,0.004905897,0.00006654281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99872965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057141516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057141516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036363564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41459262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124852216","doi":"","title":"Changing the Rules Midway: The Impact of Granting Alimony Rights on Existing and Newly-Formed Partnerships","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alimony; Cohabitation; Beneficiary; Legislature; Economics; Matching (statistics); Affect (linguistics); Political science; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Public economics; Law; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.11308854977459666,"score_gpt":0.37757445628976294,"score_spread":0.2644859065151663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124852216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97829765,0.00047306856,0.0006000833,0.0014294755,0.00003551782,0.0000648082,0.000088366134,0.000012917313,0.01899809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794906,0.00011654771,0.00012520247,0.00019477958,0.000008456258,0.000008792999,0.00001964465,0.0000027052733,0.001574761],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964749,0.0010191714,0.00007809881,0.00030409504,0.0004953979,0.0016283767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98842955,0.0050157057,0.0024727355,0.0008485151,0.0011520736,0.0020813963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030297572,0.00019850495,0.00051538134,0.00051326543,0.0028534092,0.002932638,0.0014416621,0.0014408646,0.0073930416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019812772,0.00021484963,0.00046732224,0.00064891693,0.0029715637,0.0016575814,0.0019845238,0.0014194971,0.00032911098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004227043,0.0062593836,0.47973743,0.00048870523,0.00059817324,0.0025904337,0.0112543795,0.05001292,0.011256366,0.16366659,0.009683003,0.26022562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011747613,0.003961222,0.7714086,0.00035765144,0.0011707976,0.00043125474,0.0475477,0.043142095,0.012167986,0.059459772,0.058940914,0.00023724961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33671248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45222273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33671248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010323133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008104755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6695052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124867269","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4991.2007.00239.x/enhancedabs","title":"Families, Time and Money in Canada, Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Crunch; Demographic economics; Economic shortage; Economics; Work hours; Work (physics); Labour economics; Demography; Working hours; Sociology; Population; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.020267289173573292,"score_gpt":0.2538691387942679,"score_spread":0.23360184962069463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124867269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803797,0.0012064148,0.00006760339,0.0002593748,0.000010117717,0.000020703423,0.01487911,0.000012405366,0.003164559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847231,0.0015453626,0.00018039218,0.00005253473,0.000006474722,0.000030981602,0.010395932,0.000008159105,0.0030569814],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992244,0.00007176026,0.000033049266,0.00008823725,0.00019933938,0.0003832464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830866,0.00024163778,0.00052031985,0.000039345556,0.00043148483,0.00045849982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059049175,0.00032151258,0.00049046427,0.00377515,0.0028130542,0.0020720677,0.00064342003,0.00030742696,0.0037954762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024323286,0.00022088102,0.0003503155,0.010916229,0.0007823689,0.0006560107,0.0013273635,0.00055526977,0.00032585463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017744231,0.000072033385,0.94851685,0.00011181289,0.00015328071,0.0004045918,0.008718533,0.0010697907,0.000081237304,0.0036769253,0.016522078,0.02049542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009578793,0.000012996581,0.979076,0.000088065455,0.00002791308,0.00006218354,0.010707803,0.00046415778,0.00008914026,0.00017231744,0.00926734,0.000022478513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98552424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017311327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017311327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009576756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12560308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124896484","doi":"","title":"Life After Welfare: The Economic Well-being of Welfare Leavers in Canada During the 1990s","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Earnings; Demographic economics; Economics; Longitudinal data; Labour economics; Term (time); Demography; Market economy; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.02782353113605618,"score_gpt":0.31020941744122926,"score_spread":0.2823858863051731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124896484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99394894,0.0011542598,0.000028487919,0.0012049557,0.000027047394,0.000026320095,0.0020322201,0.0000030322844,0.0015746522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99581677,0.00089381426,0.000049174225,0.00023440567,0.0000108068425,0.000011556671,0.0010739825,0.000002700492,0.0019068064],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988636,0.00008219733,0.000030703566,0.000093243456,0.00027223796,0.00065807457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979995,0.00006977225,0.00032497355,0.000038810187,0.0007943881,0.0007725176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012185032,0.00028522653,0.00054293143,0.0015269491,0.0056834305,0.0022233424,0.0013831359,0.0008134669,0.0017791755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002633775,0.00026224158,0.0004515499,0.0041843913,0.0015872349,0.0009821071,0.0015309018,0.001724716,0.00026564306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016800532,0.00013627757,0.96121216,0.00005059737,0.000051745115,0.00015218164,0.021236042,0.00012690345,0.00023054231,0.00038574418,0.0027278007,0.013521951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044890667,0.000031563162,0.98329157,0.00005377848,0.000011968469,0.000023596922,0.013966462,0.000086926404,0.00003713404,0.00003968914,0.002437968,0.000014793456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99515307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99807894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034701563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034701563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03461518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25177866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124898861","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.977519","title":"A Theory of Child Targeting","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn","keywords":"Subsidy; Economics; Cash transfers; Budget constraint; Welfare; Public economics; Maximization; Microeconomics; Poverty; Cash; Constraint (computer-aided design); Commodity; Paternalism; Macroeconomics; Economic growth; Finance","score_opus":0.007257474129627395,"score_gpt":0.25590658998321647,"score_spread":0.24864911585358906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124898861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040633544,0.000964795,0.14160018,0.013757457,0.00015035545,0.00006188083,0.00013339467,0.00008557238,0.8026128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9103203,0.0005517863,0.01440366,0.0015778508,0.000114990886,0.00015091861,0.000059020247,0.00004848812,0.07277296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859136,0.0006313018,0.000024896233,0.00028733254,0.00018416277,0.00028095132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985025,0.0008274469,0.00015125137,0.00023312539,0.00016534234,0.00012038666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015584462,0.00041884359,0.00036712116,0.0011421699,0.0030249055,0.0030463894,0.0012279067,0.0028259284,0.018032385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042078285,0.00035128114,0.00069461623,0.0012927646,0.00877545,0.0045292294,0.001759415,0.0022915036,0.001331481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017463893,0.0000034878537,0.00021139918,0.0000027909189,8.5976643e-7,0.000019537947,0.00066050375,0.00009367569,0.000012923984,0.99718034,0.00042897323,0.0013838265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000115053,0.000016817818,0.00072479405,0.000029228007,0.000006649479,0.00020048642,0.00087320403,0.0017412393,0.00011397354,0.9672599,0.029015433,0.000006732791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063608484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051174737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018032385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002541822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016046873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06032431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124917890","doi":"","title":"Work Incentives and 'In-Work' Benefit Reforms: A Review","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Poverty; Work (physics); Earned income tax credit; Labour economics; Economics; Single mothers; Demographic economics; Child poverty; Tax credit; Income Support; Public economics; Economic growth; Psychology","score_opus":0.024719588234078875,"score_gpt":0.31438741770555634,"score_spread":0.28966782947147746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124917890","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000112607144,0.9992706,0.000029956163,0.00012810221,0.000043694876,0.0000059612485,0.00000986807,0.000001401107,0.00039785833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009247623,0.9987658,0.00008534011,0.00008553044,0.000028211212,0.000007693358,0.000011212435,6.38393e-7,0.00009076259],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991418,0.0003218208,0.000118863696,0.00010378575,0.00025044483,0.00006323674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760985,0.0017449145,0.0002988874,0.00003423852,0.00024328753,0.00006883523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002232964,0.0008056621,0.0023927903,0.0031359356,0.0004611425,0.0014412812,0.0014343283,0.0019225092,0.0043160813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005119079,0.0005635298,0.00085088384,0.005122361,0.00061969424,0.0014617862,0.00088917767,0.0010393898,0.0008336699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011052116,0.0001056792,0.00039182405,0.114515945,0.00032484037,0.00012440114,0.0001937383,0.0004498458,0.00021341434,0.003585716,0.016624112,0.8633599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009443189,0.00024670883,0.005687319,0.122502245,0.001024875,0.0007328846,0.0004958203,0.00012043436,0.00036063918,0.002255809,0.8664427,0.00003619887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004420269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008657047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004420269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013508031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035174266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014438748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125016991","doi":"","title":"Stigma of Sexual Violence and Women's Decision to Work","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Stigma (botany); Work (physics); Sexual assault; Criminology; Opportunity cost; Deterrence (psychology); Demographic economics; Sexual violence; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Economics; Medicine; Engineering; Psychiatry; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.03402010536096581,"score_gpt":0.34790125606536715,"score_spread":0.31388115070440137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125016991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98940957,0.00029231003,0.00010851054,0.0010569096,0.000013976647,0.000007987986,0.000045147775,0.0000014944893,0.009064088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992853,0.00006646645,0.0000115647845,0.000033969274,0.0000048404804,0.0000016450289,0.000010127623,4.0999586e-7,0.0005857217],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999005,0.00043989133,0.000050076847,0.00007171556,0.00014605273,0.00028736884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944865,0.0024912783,0.0018485301,0.00022445124,0.0001388191,0.000810411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008819742,0.00012020237,0.00024295055,0.0005521999,0.0010482995,0.0020372984,0.00022977206,0.0006771297,0.006441684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005261596,0.00016559276,0.00030604986,0.00047663605,0.0015775829,0.00039916078,0.0011352435,0.00074950536,0.00035359868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020795119,0.0003269272,0.9692975,0.000040573756,0.00006526373,0.0005756899,0.008452456,0.00056792144,0.0002924728,0.008469113,0.0004478217,0.011256246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027896198,0.0001769792,0.9627187,0.00012776518,0.00004159519,0.0004519432,0.02505025,0.0011289553,0.00024408016,0.0064068986,0.0035992954,0.000025739997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01050971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011651287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01050971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008606456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007483071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021549582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125037805","doi":"","title":"Welfare Policy, Language Group and the Duration of Lone Motherhood Spells","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Statistics Canada; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Duration (music); Welfare; Sample (material); Demographic economics; Economics; Social policy; Marital status; Labour economics; Public economics; Demography; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.017365884791093508,"score_gpt":0.3125255657348594,"score_spread":0.2951596809437659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125037805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99811965,0.00012721271,0.00021628596,0.00038983746,0.00000761917,0.0000071018067,0.00025104522,0.000005677161,0.0008755134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987895,0.00007392581,0.000068324705,0.0000357548,0.000007702108,0.000008285392,0.00020616263,0.000002343231,0.0008081495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990908,0.00040000377,0.000041293377,0.00008599477,0.00010141041,0.0002804989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874998,0.005263617,0.0049864845,0.00040963618,0.00023606476,0.0016045102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028438398,0.00014335183,0.00043617678,0.0006722519,0.0011792532,0.0016242524,0.00046269462,0.0008367375,0.006611709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012026406,0.00015206942,0.00042641716,0.00064784207,0.0008170545,0.00063974573,0.0012087817,0.0012629697,0.0005441928],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084247784,0.00061191083,0.9695887,0.000032875207,0.00016313544,0.0005498153,0.0012435695,0.005270463,0.0005072162,0.0038478805,0.0012778318,0.016064135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006458477,0.000599741,0.97889096,0.00005935574,0.00010207491,0.00029589725,0.0038918525,0.009299923,0.00037757115,0.0046216357,0.0017656132,0.000030796084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006715829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011265086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006715829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008086471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004630145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02211833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125070370","doi":"","title":"Assortative Marriage and the Effects of Government Homecare Subsidy Programs on Gender Wage and Participation Inequality","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Economics; Inequality; Labour economics; Government (linguistics); Wage inequality; Wage; Affect (linguistics); Drop out; Gender inequality; Ex-ante; Demographic economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.0441373879122473,"score_gpt":0.3525476112004834,"score_spread":0.3084102232882361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125070370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9717981,0.00040957087,0.008105649,0.002738246,0.000032899196,0.000038656406,0.00015666659,0.000017787808,0.016702387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799335,0.00016100366,0.00031548218,0.00011457499,0.000012375561,0.000014227986,0.000012052689,0.0000021485616,0.0013747746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899536,0.0005689593,0.000017970882,0.000064532214,0.00006236273,0.0002907085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962786,0.0022245692,0.00082006777,0.00017702581,0.00010819554,0.00039152417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019160879,0.00027707912,0.0006312997,0.00039117716,0.0010064049,0.0010853946,0.0005646446,0.0010615734,0.011001793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007488236,0.00016635732,0.0004983128,0.00038522575,0.0014634068,0.00089626096,0.0014986543,0.0008388335,0.0002856323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002053383,0.0017816732,0.16317753,0.00017239583,0.00030245158,0.0017088328,0.003086354,0.09804815,0.004018985,0.6383108,0.005053519,0.08228586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005804822,0.0011713769,0.18183103,0.00012787902,0.00037325762,0.0005472553,0.004961409,0.25364846,0.0014105348,0.5481567,0.0071177976,0.00007388856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009339217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010050267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011001793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001326973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074475957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036804676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125089241","doi":"","title":"Who Marries Whom and Why","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Marriage market; Legalization; Spillover effect; Matching (statistics); Transferable utility; Economics; Econometrics; Function (biology); Nonparametric statistics; Demographic economics; Demography; Statistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Sociology; Biology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0063543259145166465,"score_gpt":0.23758840143821708,"score_spread":0.23123407552370043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125089241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4987917,0.007803437,0.06259948,0.121079,0.0013874773,0.00019101262,0.0020306436,0.0002637181,0.30585355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94962144,0.0018504704,0.0020759336,0.0019616045,0.00020997,0.000020475398,0.00017725836,0.000020516876,0.044062305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992847,0.00032500623,0.000015070201,0.00013799586,0.00010232707,0.00013490024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985538,0.0005489618,0.00036107062,0.0001331671,0.00019025142,0.00021278638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015708446,0.00011422995,0.00032491502,0.00036805766,0.00074330997,0.0017631155,0.0004211202,0.00090226176,0.018817492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00648637,0.00014517932,0.00018318431,0.0003676386,0.001019258,0.0019704867,0.00042976957,0.00090468203,0.0037238821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020234792,0.00021361317,0.13528435,0.00016989281,0.00013637256,0.0015825765,0.009994419,0.0029914058,0.0012470224,0.5215289,0.05293998,0.27370915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055756725,0.00020806126,0.07694774,0.00030028357,0.00013942074,0.003443755,0.020828035,0.027081437,0.0012425261,0.5621243,0.3075159,0.00011272291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00584731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058783405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018817492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005830884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009143253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06295073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125094986","doi":"","title":"A quantitative theory of the gender gap in wages","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; National Longitudinal Surveys; Human capital; Labour economics; Wage; Panel data; Incentive; Demographic economics; Population; Econometrics; Demography","score_opus":0.09417528672986099,"score_gpt":0.3781784270567878,"score_spread":0.2840031403269268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125094986","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24735208,0.006490482,0.5843978,0.02482389,0.00065414334,0.0004230449,0.005642444,0.00040557617,0.12981062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95860374,0.0027140314,0.017624026,0.0016934733,0.0005317818,0.00060127315,0.0011349721,0.00005449336,0.017042207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814296,0.0006535482,0.00006996006,0.00044573218,0.00039477387,0.00029300584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99338865,0.004928212,0.00071509276,0.00041206038,0.0003629463,0.0001929968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005526641,0.00046518954,0.00082211685,0.0023209169,0.0007576051,0.002087407,0.0018650867,0.0018430462,0.025601238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017491404,0.00036132004,0.000879377,0.0019015337,0.0028198399,0.0032307012,0.001601302,0.0018271654,0.0015081994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022167684,0.00006106759,0.008415904,0.00009007672,0.00002659351,0.00006934412,0.0005571964,0.005793921,0.00016901937,0.9585666,0.003454456,0.022773705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002635933,0.00005815531,0.014608691,0.00009124534,0.000013687682,0.00019830186,0.00046773115,0.024499066,0.00009083823,0.94951767,0.010406673,0.000021543565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002475848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011768047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025601238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017781688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086906634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08564466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125117121","doi":"","title":"The External Effects of Black-Male Incarceration on Black Females","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Black male; Prison; Odds; Black women; Demography; Educational attainment; Black female; Fertility; Psychology; Demographic economics; Logistic regression; Medicine; Political science; Criminology; Population; Sociology; Economics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.030551368972323627,"score_gpt":0.3283752146506225,"score_spread":0.2978238456782989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125117121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849074,0.00074132194,0.00041724698,0.00093524205,0.0000233317,0.000014207863,0.0006033415,0.000010866631,0.012346955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941398,0.00063208386,0.00015416622,0.00017744271,0.0000378454,0.000008175655,0.00021642515,0.0000071243594,0.0046269563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996203,0.00014860996,0.000009272872,0.000046968817,0.00005661989,0.00011813828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814975,0.00052412436,0.0007600466,0.00014810561,0.00015561485,0.00026231338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006558801,0.0002015292,0.0002346807,0.0005369229,0.00058840035,0.0005638457,0.00021902712,0.00035515783,0.012198337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030554975,0.0001001312,0.0003986493,0.0005176197,0.0004195601,0.00025739512,0.0011031785,0.00046703944,0.0005720843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040714594,0.00020920495,0.9534285,0.000058840495,0.0001683136,0.00023190778,0.00051112345,0.0010231672,0.0020065764,0.006417369,0.0013697223,0.03416817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072414796,0.00014700963,0.9932943,0.00003141844,0.00010212489,0.0000875149,0.00082390726,0.00042342916,0.0008193067,0.001681477,0.0025771337,0.000005059332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012446529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01971253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012446529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055086514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052581006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040807486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125153352","doi":"","title":"Family Proximity, Childcare, and Women's Labor Force Attachment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Labour economics; Parental leave; Public health insurance; Business; Economics; Demography; Economic growth; Sociology; Health insurance; Population","score_opus":0.03829449939300762,"score_gpt":0.31439817379786156,"score_spread":0.27610367440485395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125153352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959585,0.0004999544,0.00019286893,0.0002635336,0.0000096702,0.0000034140783,0.00019824495,0.0000020507287,0.0028717418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990503,0.00020209004,0.000039052426,0.000025395642,0.0000060838856,0.000002528461,0.00006171521,7.711709e-7,0.0006120767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996959,0.00010841198,0.000015612135,0.000058852194,0.000042508993,0.00007867007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976641,0.0007653102,0.000987692,0.00010070538,0.000071428454,0.00041072222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044918698,0.00014214069,0.00021751643,0.00050634844,0.0006323399,0.0009163766,0.0002477827,0.00028557293,0.008134152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042115864,0.000107698586,0.00025737696,0.00089555973,0.00044223174,0.00045092404,0.0011698429,0.00033206472,0.00041978655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061881605,0.000043354474,0.9906012,0.000018008486,0.000058129284,0.00018738181,0.0010763784,0.00018306801,0.00013707369,0.0007882684,0.00034532123,0.0064999997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000425419,0.000061982966,0.9952773,0.00002357722,0.00002674785,0.0001567766,0.0022280535,0.00023717257,0.000065635344,0.0005879843,0.001326411,0.0000040927093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010594194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019065466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010594194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036737093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022755004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027211487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125154366","doi":"10.20381/ruor-25536","title":"Opting or Not Opting to Share Income Tax Information with the Census: Does it Affect Research Findings?","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Affect (linguistics); Census; Economics; Wage; Distribution (mathematics); Income tax; Economic inequality; Income distribution; Demographic economics; Public economics; Actuarial science; Inequality; Labour economics; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Law; Population","score_opus":0.10158573203502533,"score_gpt":0.3570863402043926,"score_spread":0.25550060816936726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125154366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7282273,0.025395844,0.008888252,0.17637561,0.0024239344,0.0012997172,0.0049892957,0.000043539207,0.052356485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97388893,0.0035362854,0.0029733616,0.015767762,0.00057826075,0.0006563279,0.00038695658,0.000067877154,0.002144165],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.72864497,0.19689593,0.016939983,0.013891519,0.034915905,0.008711809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.28931874,0.49810594,0.13662131,0.03222396,0.039361898,0.0043682707],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26519018,0.00038832237,0.0009873637,0.0031994234,0.0037563362,0.008258724,0.0030351097,0.002580898,0.009698254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5851934,0.0006552946,0.001411393,0.008599906,0.012763674,0.0074026566,0.0032772261,0.002809469,0.0011541425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007859692,0.0003887067,0.775082,0.002151356,0.0011968118,0.0005137725,0.062270705,0.0003675489,0.00031348888,0.032896064,0.019206557,0.10482707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026732433,0.00063508365,0.71986175,0.012860878,0.002140081,0.0005469015,0.15024562,0.0014379565,0.0039190864,0.020913517,0.08686804,0.00030384923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16404274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16897115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8359573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010763766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021177396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9061513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125175413","doi":"10.3138/cpp.38.4.471","title":"Income Replacement Rates among Canadian Seniors: The Effect of Widowhood and Divorce","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.010740331252067572,"score_gpt":0.259659485838859,"score_spread":0.24891915458679142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125175413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99045193,0.0027466172,0.00015942643,0.0006294184,0.0000377072,0.00003377242,0.0032430324,0.0000110441615,0.0026870659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99588203,0.0011581962,0.00014134613,0.00006642905,0.000009726828,0.000016724509,0.0011782738,0.0000045194843,0.0015427205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803585,0.00031731484,0.00011288644,0.00023088051,0.0005994662,0.00070356415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936087,0.0013137258,0.0014946254,0.0005103717,0.0018020149,0.0012705368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037360128,0.00048218676,0.00066047267,0.002106115,0.00241416,0.001520436,0.0018428444,0.00073014357,0.004450783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0146128265,0.0003751207,0.0017164006,0.0036897908,0.0008952833,0.0005733436,0.0009868564,0.0010167834,0.00028646927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002461445,0.000030954234,0.991582,0.000025280788,0.00015152975,0.000053982676,0.00072159444,0.00015978652,0.00003218783,0.00022095037,0.0004523793,0.0063230973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008160593,0.00004153213,0.99753356,0.000030020014,0.00007569209,0.000026867892,0.0010526637,0.0002715474,0.00003123565,0.00004557477,0.0008726135,0.000010543747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99005336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01843098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01843098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026260106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13372672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125220839","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3075158","title":"Long-Term Care Insurance: Knowledge Barriers, Risk Perception and Adverse Selection","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université Laval; HEC Montréal","funders":"HEC Montréal; KU Leuven","keywords":"Adverse selection; Actuarial science; Product (mathematics); Bequest; Business; Population; Long-term care insurance; Public economics; Term (time); Group insurance; Limiting; Economics; Insurance policy; Long-term care; General insurance; Income protection insurance; Medicine","score_opus":0.008254385537879529,"score_gpt":0.28350338977798867,"score_spread":0.2752490042401091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125220839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967339,0.00037103283,0.00004670314,0.0010042907,0.000014531815,0.000008465807,0.000105147534,0.0000012887331,0.0017147184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99929106,0.00009736153,0.000027097574,0.00011448582,0.000015952493,0.0000038581593,0.00004670406,0.0000010745382,0.00040232152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828655,0.0006773777,0.0001541431,0.00012244681,0.0003213108,0.00043817825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842248,0.007600032,0.003952718,0.0004953313,0.00063029194,0.0030968585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024950646,0.00019346553,0.0003651464,0.000986691,0.0011396083,0.0017170494,0.0005507583,0.0013900297,0.008342095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018179549,0.00021220402,0.00062842516,0.0009187821,0.0006821088,0.0011405597,0.0011010277,0.001599951,0.0003249429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007966079,0.00052357395,0.993948,0.000011504562,0.00004656043,0.00008560214,0.0012275547,0.000039451315,0.000035667814,0.00021519884,0.00019849885,0.003588827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012969679,0.00012907028,0.9926259,0.00005006443,0.000043504282,0.00012350634,0.0056875283,0.0003614951,0.0000373591,0.0004945753,0.00042319103,0.00001086159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023581231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0271895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023581231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006784972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019007166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046887934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125225519","doi":"10.1111/caje.12326","title":"Income instability and fiscal progression","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Cummings Foundation","keywords":"Personal income tax; Humanities; Economics; Welfare economics; Political science; Gross income; Public economics; Art; Tax reform; State income tax","score_opus":0.08808479494714667,"score_gpt":0.22904948190326957,"score_spread":0.1409646869561229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125225519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98175347,0.00036034852,0.00097259134,0.00037255994,0.000013605378,0.000025604459,0.0016870507,0.000058249057,0.0147566525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99775165,0.00009171709,0.00022005584,0.000011926947,0.0000066203906,0.000005932686,0.0006498362,0.00000686534,0.0012552809],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909925,0.00007751521,0.000051162795,0.00013766163,0.0004115204,0.00022288035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628735,0.00038722274,0.0014047342,0.00014059845,0.0012347387,0.0005453528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000991804,0.0002547741,0.00024639253,0.003627346,0.0011815312,0.0017797481,0.0005068226,0.00025630585,0.004363849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065702004,0.00011219804,0.00039596547,0.0034500316,0.0012687716,0.0004896008,0.0010802997,0.00088225777,0.0003542867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014868719,0.00004318193,0.9549401,0.000025306235,0.000084263746,0.00012390128,0.0011276623,0.0043896995,0.00029824587,0.007551287,0.0015216366,0.029746093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004073908,0.000027237551,0.99268734,0.000020026982,0.00001078281,0.000056211804,0.0005273286,0.0019046965,0.00015073433,0.0010858653,0.0035128547,0.000012940075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6675677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.549147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6675677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0095934095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072165667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6687802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125265242","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4932.2011.00776.x","title":"Bargaining Over Labour: Do Patients Have Any Power?*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Record","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Bargaining power; Preference; Exploit; Power (physics); Variation (astronomy); Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Demography; Microeconomics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.024356836388996866,"score_gpt":0.2537501380416577,"score_spread":0.22939330165266084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125265242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70642275,0.0043940153,0.016692273,0.13461538,0.0004213835,0.000062570056,0.00032572835,0.000024800083,0.13704112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99607736,0.00043606514,0.0003895778,0.0015665406,0.00011723379,0.000013927812,0.000017042106,0.000004074043,0.0013782921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962746,0.0024521614,0.00010259506,0.0002718562,0.00042965746,0.00046909755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881962,0.008215832,0.0017840848,0.000556049,0.00028571446,0.00096209237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066376096,0.00023939864,0.00042195988,0.0006317996,0.0018320697,0.0037824898,0.0006468741,0.0017346083,0.017136924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030799199,0.00018692152,0.00023510153,0.001148705,0.005492941,0.004152119,0.001626179,0.0017846606,0.0007378482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008426706,0.00023767563,0.23221292,0.00022969316,0.00012493065,0.0008331686,0.032415736,0.0022902,0.0008883889,0.45053735,0.015460317,0.26392695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017432045,0.00039024206,0.089819044,0.00041821285,0.00007448184,0.0021184217,0.09075515,0.0065272707,0.00069620635,0.7151308,0.093814194,0.0000816965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014613242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016500738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017136924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013869116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010657152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05732876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125266637","doi":"","title":"Paying People to Be Healthy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Information System of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences (Ardabil University of Medical Sciences)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Unintended consequences; Paternalism; Psychological intervention; Legitimacy; Public economics; Promotion (chess); Business; Public relations; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Psychology; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.0901510370386612,"score_gpt":0.34325050271184593,"score_spread":0.25309946567318475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125266637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30035964,0.006284586,0.005283136,0.1526614,0.004381536,0.00026029765,0.0010930246,0.00035362414,0.5293228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8795813,0.0034484891,0.0029826134,0.021576522,0.001003267,0.00021594702,0.0002948762,0.000040507115,0.09085638],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839383,0.00074534304,0.000040703544,0.00013625616,0.00032912524,0.0003547698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757427,0.0006855118,0.00039094762,0.00020083632,0.00025532392,0.00089312147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019075178,0.00017261929,0.00014818113,0.0006711393,0.001441726,0.0017435888,0.00031096785,0.0014543904,0.026218235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008333926,0.00011119898,0.0001831115,0.00044670375,0.001028965,0.00126499,0.0018045238,0.0010200498,0.0021669732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013469277,0.0002922395,0.06633922,0.00023232025,0.000030554045,0.0001959748,0.0078782225,0.00016763875,0.0011389292,0.16100046,0.23182799,0.5307617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050146165,0.00038293444,0.14042513,0.00044766132,0.000043666616,0.00056011137,0.011376343,0.00046203702,0.0007549942,0.044417433,0.80102104,0.000058444646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052715284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008875725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026218235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009566812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020023421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08770871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125295878","doi":"10.1920/wp.ifs.2004.0414","title":"Breaking the cycle? The effect of education on welfare receipt among children of welfare recipients","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Welfare; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.009608817508947992,"score_gpt":0.2940397752392994,"score_spread":0.28443095773035143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125295878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865116,0.0016161745,0.0002834556,0.0051079676,0.00009125323,0.000035929035,0.0017368753,0.000015855769,0.0046009757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99451506,0.0006794882,0.00016073564,0.0007285629,0.00006194187,0.0000251388,0.00071088766,0.000016740878,0.003101563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753225,0.00070334063,0.00008682907,0.00024975179,0.00021001487,0.0012178336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993188,0.0023438595,0.002038139,0.00041414212,0.00043678284,0.0015790695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027285174,0.00024000242,0.00053753477,0.0009805434,0.0010090672,0.0021128291,0.0011141511,0.0017296615,0.0140165305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01435508,0.00022556922,0.0013721968,0.0013957369,0.000971809,0.001484046,0.0025709427,0.0017548683,0.00084085047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025492994,0.00018624695,0.97921354,0.000024380615,0.00016788776,0.000082412276,0.00075503316,0.00030274055,0.000047060796,0.0015720966,0.0018650797,0.015528605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029686998,0.00011660678,0.99332905,0.00014395679,0.00022250137,0.000031452815,0.0022620072,0.0006045106,0.00006954182,0.0010912196,0.0020842175,0.000015172993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2722955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30796772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2722955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024058474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048046974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5414212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125388243","doi":"","title":"An Econometric Analysis of the Impact of the Self-Sufficiency Project on the Employment Behaviour of Former Welfare Recipients","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Human Resources and Skills Development Canada; Michigan Diabetes Research Center, University of Michigan; Sugar Research and Development Corporation","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Economics; Econometric model; Raw data; Work (physics); Baseline (sea); Demographic economics; Estimation; Percentage point; Labour economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.04368657873860106,"score_gpt":0.36365941028754184,"score_spread":0.3199728315489408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125388243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99531436,0.0001370179,0.0017188543,0.00041012588,0.000011029207,0.00004369172,0.0007628864,0.000016761394,0.0015853028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957573,0.00018530169,0.0006739134,0.000050318966,0.000016066428,0.00004932684,0.00069116964,0.00000406723,0.0025725232],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853337,0.00088996085,0.00004061508,0.0000795631,0.00012457726,0.00033183617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99096125,0.006898746,0.0010960025,0.0002691508,0.00041025472,0.00036456445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031701094,0.00029257537,0.00053192955,0.0008680286,0.00039505513,0.00072136475,0.0007374177,0.00079109037,0.005831432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009219274,0.0002339631,0.0010087054,0.0015058445,0.0005517998,0.00039404674,0.00084895635,0.0012295686,0.0005678556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019902901,0.0032855421,0.7523763,0.00026280977,0.0006395185,0.00095362565,0.001252605,0.17752282,0.001684383,0.012695585,0.0054605044,0.041875985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030534176,0.0022595625,0.7613748,0.000046743487,0.00052070495,0.00013667975,0.0047678156,0.22366488,0.0010806929,0.0032365257,0.002541654,0.0000646582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05464867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035470594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05464867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002450198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014960828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108661175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125431006","doi":"10.1920/wp.ifs.1998.9820","title":"Collective labour supply: heterogeneity and non-participation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; Economic and Social Research Council; Concordia University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Labour supply; Labour economics; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.034682824485439495,"score_gpt":0.34167007323175863,"score_spread":0.3069872487463191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125431006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66718394,0.000858868,0.31680995,0.0025796418,0.000080244594,0.00012303778,0.00081784837,0.00010999581,0.011436424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900932,0.0002538811,0.0047767423,0.000064759166,0.00006068963,0.000088555804,0.0004124404,0.000015073973,0.004234589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731463,0.0014061163,0.000112410315,0.00051752257,0.00034074063,0.00030854566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97965103,0.0135502,0.0037891895,0.0022597753,0.00041950523,0.00033032126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054857275,0.00043521012,0.0010432419,0.0006069269,0.0006053746,0.0021934279,0.0019374081,0.0011858745,0.008851952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022015918,0.00040596776,0.0014083004,0.0013334659,0.001871841,0.0017630551,0.0023894578,0.0012936438,0.00063695473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034522146,0.00024202098,0.14957157,0.00041183783,0.0006266183,0.0011413449,0.0046520615,0.25116953,0.0011273498,0.5130829,0.0055079674,0.07212154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009896646,0.00015284814,0.041612543,0.00017817479,0.00016183149,0.0003214462,0.002006557,0.513448,0.00066430174,0.4351301,0.0061494084,0.000075761054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074741193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005551573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008851952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012465763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008317572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02961272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125461096","doi":"","title":"Marital Property Laws and Women’s Labour Supply","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Poverty; Distribution (mathematics); Labour supply; Economics; Labour economics; Property (philosophy); Civil code; Demographic economics; Law; Political science; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.030641096457853758,"score_gpt":0.3130196016372953,"score_spread":0.2823785051794416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125461096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.960821,0.0014890094,0.00016798837,0.0041317292,0.000034423592,0.000018675344,0.0015493506,0.0000050615886,0.03178273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856899,0.00066999707,0.000036775145,0.00012639065,0.000022197813,0.000012052087,0.0003542912,0.0000042254305,0.013084271],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918526,0.00016877265,0.000058743208,0.00006035827,0.00021877512,0.00030809958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947805,0.0014562435,0.0019751776,0.00023116566,0.00075346074,0.00080335856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010152594,0.000091431895,0.00023037576,0.0015171452,0.0017807498,0.0018566994,0.0005186922,0.0004259473,0.023309624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074555255,0.00019262785,0.00023271525,0.0028648407,0.0011946885,0.00089701574,0.0012746892,0.00060773786,0.0010239864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011472369,0.00007584314,0.9590975,0.00006495397,0.00004270548,0.00037641873,0.008032228,0.00034224667,0.00009943347,0.006977425,0.0030973302,0.021679232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009175299,0.000044057106,0.9625657,0.00019010855,0.000014658535,0.00008887728,0.016052593,0.00031962807,0.00007481248,0.0012530723,0.01937613,0.00001111561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4557821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63109356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4557821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055007692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9062583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125462267","doi":"10.3886/e127501","title":"Great Depression and the rise of female employment: A new hypothesis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cohort; Depression (economics); Census; Crash; Great Depression; Demographic economics; Cohort effect; Economics; Work (physics); Labour economics; Demography; Medicine; Political science; Sociology; Population; Engineering; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.06382657666931914,"score_gpt":0.32945620885509547,"score_spread":0.26562963218577634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125462267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9283072,0.0037865534,0.0028148454,0.024316397,0.00023361639,0.000040596562,0.00049455604,0.00004479044,0.039961502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955491,0.0013467907,0.00028281737,0.0008361177,0.0003392148,0.000013524629,0.00008333192,0.0000043829514,0.0015448793],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977297,0.000045277648,0.000011196875,0.000078162586,0.000027631435,0.00006474228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804914,0.00091104815,0.0004511566,0.00012940519,0.00008249462,0.0003767452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079155754,0.00018194543,0.00027425302,0.00074528006,0.00045780028,0.0013492774,0.0005014942,0.0012428002,0.010941553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026784192,0.00020975707,0.00043030785,0.00069313333,0.0024099296,0.0017826493,0.0012365197,0.0007165157,0.0004615788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000575888,0.00037405442,0.71598357,0.00032010974,0.00015848682,0.002329311,0.006618683,0.0010621774,0.0026160968,0.19769788,0.0056667696,0.06659697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021379838,0.0003717915,0.86235195,0.0001927617,0.00012243418,0.0012398489,0.0073848,0.002760093,0.00054781383,0.10757106,0.017201586,0.000042094776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032149558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002503262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010941553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047818213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000568777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036603153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125517169","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1278934","title":"The Changing Intra-Household Resource Allocation in Russia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Earnings; Economics; Wage; Labour economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.015685440833690816,"score_gpt":0.2455732779694287,"score_spread":0.2298878371357379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125517169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948571,0.00009115895,0.0001410919,0.00023904874,0.0000034232942,0.0000011867891,0.00004633084,0.0000018664775,0.0046188063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99919933,0.000032150998,0.000019187786,0.000008427595,0.000001754497,0.0000012453165,0.000012646748,0.0000011549413,0.000724086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994437,0.00019112289,0.000014691378,0.00006178369,0.00003510964,0.0002536179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968636,0.00009639667,0.00007083173,0.000026341124,0.00003805753,0.00008207023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050665066,0.000082066086,0.00026821342,0.00066868035,0.001333436,0.001151964,0.00037558895,0.00031948765,0.0027582177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096791785,0.00009927042,0.00014772968,0.0007621849,0.0010618439,0.000620187,0.0015364424,0.0003025093,0.0003152932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001089543,0.00016458338,0.7068803,0.00011382042,0.00012083753,0.0010193889,0.042320102,0.004355733,0.0071845474,0.17336446,0.0019603444,0.061426427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001146327,0.0000863293,0.9540005,0.000034750108,0.000021334097,0.00015454856,0.023520889,0.0014866497,0.00059172075,0.007756915,0.012318796,0.000016306272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020274084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022226464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020274084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022405984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011746488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04031211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125539648","doi":"","title":"The Timing of Teenage Births and the Signaling Value of a High School Degree","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Earnings; Value (mathematics); Fertility; Population; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Causality (physics); Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Demography; Sociology; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.044655783644318665,"score_gpt":0.32247820589167653,"score_spread":0.27782242224735787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125539648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952324,0.00030503224,0.0008047386,0.00019209269,0.000016094908,0.000018705496,0.0006385473,0.00000844006,0.0027838715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971623,0.00023134047,0.00017818667,0.000022431816,0.00001857844,0.000010786783,0.0004486016,0.0000032837647,0.0019245574],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993389,0.00023012064,0.000044074037,0.00010810715,0.000097797805,0.0001809831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98631734,0.0071015717,0.004688884,0.00046768726,0.00022220769,0.0012023344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015433163,0.00018592221,0.00030241354,0.00086699246,0.0003635613,0.0012712296,0.000544834,0.0007077816,0.0078105913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010909564,0.00019044528,0.0006313009,0.00077616423,0.0005828625,0.0006308669,0.0007260719,0.0010118474,0.0006050726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020213611,0.0000801206,0.99203414,0.00002351066,0.00010532879,0.00008445974,0.0001517471,0.000956318,0.0002602193,0.0015404221,0.00021357425,0.004348084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022003342,0.00032335555,0.9916489,0.000030283809,0.0001247151,0.00019214119,0.00083570764,0.0030884154,0.00073758856,0.0014422192,0.0015432979,0.000011421619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008499962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008974874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008499962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006305856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049889076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026129007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125574479","doi":"","title":"Incorporating Nonmarket Time Into Benefit-Cost Analyses of Social Programs: An Application to the Self-Sufficiency Project","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Earnings; Incentive; Welfare; Labour economics; Poverty; Social Welfare; Business; Wage; Nonmarket forces; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Economics; Finance; Economic growth; Accounting","score_opus":0.055220102823939965,"score_gpt":0.3948365096557056,"score_spread":0.33961640683176564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125574479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61343515,0.004441648,0.34788725,0.003855665,0.00034649263,0.004115336,0.0026282733,0.0004729516,0.02281723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.861155,0.0014135725,0.12917478,0.00031223675,0.00016119299,0.0018402382,0.00057453563,0.00022474883,0.0051436913],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784333,0.019264922,0.00025088165,0.0004974639,0.0010087572,0.0005445658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8632978,0.12912618,0.002967702,0.002121553,0.0017435334,0.000743197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03520511,0.0017734321,0.0022168094,0.00322748,0.0011428996,0.0022237264,0.0021870055,0.0017466722,0.014759737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077722624,0.0009093947,0.00332788,0.0037279816,0.0017652512,0.004113817,0.0026886016,0.002849667,0.00020587545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037110588,0.004972855,0.020829426,0.001706837,0.002272795,0.0004253062,0.0011704485,0.6052129,0.000984654,0.1773671,0.0040638773,0.17728265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010406704,0.002594497,0.0098611,0.00024929972,0.00084618095,0.00006155285,0.00091198005,0.82227904,0.0010852596,0.15294693,0.007986086,0.00013742033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033049066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02899423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03520511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005956318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006594668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18618464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125582706","doi":"","title":"All in the Family: A Simultaneous Model of Parenting Style and Child Conduct","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Simultaneity; Psychology; Style (visual arts); Developmental psychology; Parenting styles; Perception; National Longitudinal Surveys; Principal (computer security); Social psychology; Parenting skills; Demographic economics; Economics; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.08609201518202493,"score_gpt":0.35907950142070566,"score_spread":0.27298748623868074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125582706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58395594,0.0026202325,0.2904021,0.01143433,0.0003330243,0.00020266057,0.0029309208,0.00037755573,0.10774319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434853,0.0016850177,0.013338039,0.00023834496,0.00018121504,0.00023040018,0.00050328637,0.000073500705,0.04026497],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923,0.000385564,0.000021841168,0.00012714576,0.00008016696,0.00015528844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987582,0.0005569498,0.00021708374,0.00007779611,0.000104813276,0.0002852872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011194705,0.0010669454,0.00093916734,0.00067546545,0.0010032668,0.00285448,0.0026322962,0.0017429878,0.011081917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027757804,0.0009197579,0.0012572005,0.0011791072,0.0016206948,0.0022146073,0.0017887948,0.0017777026,0.0013085352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036855802,0.00047225077,0.032459743,0.000110607914,0.0004029462,0.0021135008,0.0033675956,0.5143943,0.0008606964,0.41980374,0.0065559084,0.019090272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022173568,0.00018536323,0.008966949,0.000054700333,0.00019390491,0.00047007698,0.0010576925,0.84503996,0.000074634125,0.13707449,0.006604499,0.000055976896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041676138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028288106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041676138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019907353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019833567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082867086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125589405","doi":"10.1257/aer.102.5.1927","title":"The Impact of Family Income on Child Achievement: Evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":817,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Adjusted gross income; Disadvantaged; Earned income tax credit; Instrumental variable; Income tax; Family income; Gross income; Test (biology); Demographic economics; Econometrics; Labour economics; Tax credit; State income tax; Tax reform; Public economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03700051456106048,"score_gpt":0.33644151668019795,"score_spread":0.2994410021191375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125589405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97246236,0.007866221,0.0007087083,0.0038774207,0.000049115326,0.000025629848,0.0026539913,0.000022809967,0.012333734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933975,0.004271532,0.00013094973,0.00018966327,0.00004699257,0.000012088617,0.0008772195,0.0000054237157,0.0010686665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837106,0.00095154124,0.00006131861,0.00012737759,0.00027666643,0.00021209232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96545047,0.021258844,0.009571016,0.0013028912,0.00126208,0.0011546136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033836754,0.00025809376,0.0004858692,0.0017217794,0.00049256417,0.0012520571,0.000865599,0.00059561845,0.009280285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020483531,0.00022264742,0.00066755305,0.0028640835,0.0014665681,0.00071643066,0.0017669508,0.0012890348,0.000675054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042693922,0.0002473349,0.95649844,0.00012933079,0.00050968333,0.00038941923,0.0004565072,0.0016063958,0.000065805216,0.008391505,0.003957501,0.027321074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008553241,0.00020917357,0.9865832,0.00020458915,0.000441859,0.00015756817,0.0007952257,0.0016019848,0.00024519672,0.0036210038,0.006038556,0.000016038543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032342356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025783025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032342356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010663301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009076586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06430817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125597567","doi":"","title":"New Estimates of Public Employment and Training Program Net Impacts: A Nonexperimental Evaluation of the Workforce Investment Act Program","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Minds at UW (University of Wisconsin)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Workforce; Liberian dollar; Propensity score matching; Demographic economics; Business; Investment (military); Quarter (Canadian coin); Matching (statistics); Training (meteorology); Labour economics; Economics; Finance; Economic growth; Medicine; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.09847258892545449,"score_gpt":0.33659814407604255,"score_spread":0.23812555515058806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125597567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7991618,0.0039171996,0.15101507,0.0018156929,0.00048445747,0.008614252,0.017449096,0.00041948396,0.017122949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9351396,0.00063898234,0.044512246,0.00079673465,0.00016548125,0.00919634,0.004853941,0.0000626114,0.0046340707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8925077,0.09760734,0.0022269704,0.0026442548,0.0043591904,0.00065454544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5128538,0.43839017,0.026224492,0.016271953,0.0055754487,0.0006841846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11439758,0.0011513782,0.0018141988,0.001782938,0.00062756357,0.0017537585,0.0024508715,0.001071272,0.0062912786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20552076,0.00065488036,0.0037820747,0.0015565539,0.0013776991,0.0019517118,0.00227156,0.0018335948,0.00056613056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025563952,0.01481545,0.45882496,0.006279915,0.04838896,0.0016791889,0.0028319769,0.14564031,0.0019203158,0.06128449,0.021170504,0.21159995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011460397,0.041244052,0.55922544,0.0018684423,0.03642034,0.0012361002,0.0047652414,0.21881007,0.010339343,0.061214227,0.05278856,0.0006277513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042972043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024744973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11439758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013023131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016447235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6049994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125624626","doi":"","title":"For Better For Worse: The Long-Term Effects of Postwar Reconstruction on Family Formation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; World War II; Term (time); First world war; Cohort; Differential (mechanical device); Population; Economics; Mobilization; Political science; Demography; Sociology; History; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.009064196292347828,"score_gpt":0.2536331778399021,"score_spread":0.24456898154755424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125624626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99604696,0.0008980174,0.00014216913,0.0008291335,0.000017411774,0.000003059502,0.00017996816,0.0000031930783,0.0018799428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887544,0.00026529888,0.000030361272,0.000050067967,0.000010975557,0.0000016808465,0.00005760211,9.541301e-7,0.0007075066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995963,0.000139716,0.00001096327,0.00006517461,0.000031377407,0.00015646644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974974,0.0009125483,0.000878331,0.0002122479,0.0000883897,0.00041115872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011238401,0.00017586812,0.0001850245,0.00041655047,0.00051241834,0.0007915779,0.00028871407,0.00043489618,0.007963992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038713065,0.00009560135,0.00026391633,0.00048050555,0.00082662184,0.0007138477,0.0010448461,0.00054722,0.00029649312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087437365,0.00026576646,0.9487238,0.00005073669,0.00022703157,0.0005389326,0.002022029,0.0011111327,0.00086027896,0.0069390875,0.00088902435,0.03749775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008213224,0.00011811796,0.9956203,0.00002481331,0.000043979857,0.000048427042,0.0013913154,0.00019898516,0.00022199415,0.0011150888,0.0012024054,0.000006339138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007820853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013210651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007963992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005546271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049555104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026642203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125659901","doi":"","title":"Household Responses to Individual Shocks: Disability, Labour Supply","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Human capital; Odds; British Household Panel Survey; Labour supply; Linkage (software); Work (physics); Labour economics; Exploit; Capital (architecture); Demographic economics; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.03638960026128959,"score_gpt":0.30600519045978103,"score_spread":0.26961559019849146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125659901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851827,0.0014485604,0.0038265213,0.0026233043,0.000027126156,0.00004377211,0.001294356,0.000025470516,0.0055281576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985056,0.00030904435,0.00022172848,0.0001376742,0.000008825785,0.000009011007,0.00019694681,0.0000021433207,0.0006091274],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956924,0.0001407206,0.000026548001,0.00008475,0.000056233643,0.00012249533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987348,0.00039330288,0.00042772008,0.00013531421,0.00012696814,0.0001818665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000883702,0.00016779284,0.00037355997,0.00047102213,0.00034675043,0.0011884058,0.00031664062,0.0008124483,0.0023379214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004555742,0.00016110325,0.00031124428,0.0008811963,0.0006660209,0.0007683478,0.00071500544,0.0004632291,0.00022077575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024595496,0.00012466173,0.90538937,0.00014857142,0.00027566042,0.00030389044,0.0051132836,0.009457226,0.0012847765,0.006856132,0.0017996485,0.06900078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066766997,0.00006358621,0.9795821,0.00004518106,0.00003665943,0.000098617704,0.0034541842,0.004098096,0.00017638359,0.010109485,0.0022999374,0.00002907576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05173528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033739965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05173528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012024547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044853744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10286832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125668428","doi":"","title":"Household Time Allocation and Modes of Behavior: A Theory of Sorts","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Economics; Bargaining problem; Nash equilibrium; Time allocation; Microeconomics; Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Population; Production (economics); Class (philosophy); Marriage market; Simple (philosophy); Econometrics; Best response; Mathematical economics; Labour economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04639222756301242,"score_gpt":0.32408867923526763,"score_spread":0.2776964516722552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125668428","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14445749,0.0037726734,0.66100186,0.012260887,0.00033541268,0.00048486338,0.0010094979,0.0003259131,0.17635149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8691206,0.0019774367,0.10262446,0.0009019247,0.00049080985,0.001184628,0.0005291148,0.00017890429,0.022992143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954632,0.0021441644,0.00023257034,0.0009002926,0.0006980142,0.0005617555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98564875,0.008955492,0.0016003348,0.0019953616,0.00091370655,0.00088638015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069648772,0.00078746333,0.0011537123,0.005101592,0.0031714537,0.0071174377,0.0027466267,0.0023744758,0.02415919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020708404,0.0007805125,0.0025033727,0.0062740096,0.011946979,0.014984137,0.004376978,0.0027849532,0.002012423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010075725,0.0000072821613,0.0009703763,0.000012918475,0.000008331794,0.000017713102,0.0007826923,0.0005627768,0.000026515861,0.99395025,0.00039258847,0.003258524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016236587,0.000014233809,0.0006584638,0.000018408047,0.000012967597,0.00008267722,0.0004223364,0.0051266477,0.000022626375,0.989618,0.003996557,0.000010828346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031493742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017530575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02415919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035741294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011031637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08082056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125677388","doi":"","title":"Female Employment in MENA’s Manufacturing Sector: The Implications of Firm-Related and National Factors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Logit; Production (economics); Demographic economics; Middle East; Manufacturing sector; Foreign ownership; Economics; Private sector; Business; Labour economics; Economic growth; Geography; Foreign direct investment; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.0782315725260495,"score_gpt":0.35689055084501853,"score_spread":0.278658978318969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125677388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958722,0.0008838298,0.0001336943,0.000651877,0.0000090720105,0.000005140749,0.00011356946,0.0000010885068,0.0023296296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99890304,0.00038235265,0.000043070497,0.000039080343,0.000010446207,0.000003744766,0.00006560499,0.0000010142259,0.00055161206],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993855,0.00022918911,0.000019595202,0.00008082655,0.00007123612,0.00021371599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987418,0.0005808478,0.00036518936,0.000040870353,0.00009149388,0.00017992563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010673642,0.00018589206,0.00031051872,0.00078209426,0.00086701306,0.0010971982,0.00029398125,0.0002661554,0.0042162687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023483457,0.00010950942,0.00029131674,0.0012748234,0.000576373,0.0005971358,0.0008588588,0.0003945491,0.00031343588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006445306,0.000055943077,0.9834024,0.000037639584,0.000047041183,0.00046468183,0.002786378,0.00030087057,0.00023483431,0.0021582586,0.00038264823,0.010064964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028179647,0.00004502045,0.9834826,0.000058334623,0.000026251206,0.0001233415,0.013045959,0.00059242017,0.00014705097,0.000490007,0.0019809972,0.000005258564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019825533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03522216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019825533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008239187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007180578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039420247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125733782","doi":"10.5167/uzh-143675","title":"Maternal depression,women’s empowerment, and parental investment: evidence from a large randomized control trial","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Grand Challenges Canada","keywords":"Empowerment; Psychological intervention; Randomized controlled trial; Depression (economics); Intervention (counseling); Leverage (statistics); Women's empowerment; Psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.017934231640338052,"score_gpt":0.28442113057529905,"score_spread":0.266486898934961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125733782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8726888,0.108961314,0.0016924593,0.0041729943,0.0023071037,0.0041719177,0.0010070563,0.00009901087,0.004899347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975633,0.017271964,0.001919072,0.0012183757,0.00050583266,0.0024146063,0.00030277026,0.000012741814,0.0007215935],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932882,0.004967317,0.00055054325,0.000527276,0.0004012678,0.00026545944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989062,0.0075778337,0.0018352041,0.0006467463,0.00033160797,0.0005466485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071777143,0.0007225815,0.0020470659,0.0005667431,0.00062861625,0.0010422325,0.0008187415,0.002159958,0.0052152253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020313561,0.00041925244,0.002310039,0.000948418,0.0013920697,0.00070628006,0.0006044685,0.0016603123,0.00031319962],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.7975725,0.016950173,0.006964416,0.019418178,0.02578028,0.00016124039,0.00036252147,0.0006012276,0.0014838027,0.0010000927,0.0025627764,0.1271428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.8873732,0.06369246,0.016020374,0.0034245213,0.02245617,0.00011380597,0.00024073407,0.00062969554,0.0009061357,0.0012077258,0.0038797918,0.000055368146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027694413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033764394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071777143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009557519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014563841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037959814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125813585","doi":"","title":"Manipulability in Matching Markets: Conflict and Coincidence of Interests","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative statics; Coincidence; Matching (statistics); Marriage market; Truncation (statistics); Mechanism (biology); Statics; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Demographic economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Medicine; Epistemology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.05208226575715561,"score_gpt":0.3607532635328937,"score_spread":0.3086709977757381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125813585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5253212,0.0020773967,0.3142065,0.015459076,0.00019267194,0.00043352967,0.0002335915,0.00015533237,0.1419206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847466,0.00031562985,0.011172594,0.00029141782,0.00009791781,0.00014757636,0.000034136327,0.000024451103,0.003169714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822411,0.012161064,0.00076502946,0.0021056146,0.0014624213,0.0012647334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9063429,0.07109002,0.011409021,0.006149583,0.0017977355,0.0032105974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020692876,0.0006244598,0.0023884098,0.0015724606,0.0027533784,0.00803201,0.0026545564,0.0054054847,0.012264947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10693735,0.0012427339,0.0018851174,0.0015189853,0.009744029,0.011896432,0.007366722,0.0038618024,0.0008119182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026531843,0.00011877095,0.003879683,0.00010983836,0.000104392915,0.0004296398,0.0012161322,0.007669797,0.00053215545,0.9725084,0.0010256757,0.012140226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011309821,0.00005248582,0.0009445317,0.00003511547,0.00003729224,0.00020650754,0.00049868185,0.035325166,0.00013927885,0.9613015,0.0013197318,0.000026627908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012626672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087423023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020692876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023850277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019230713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10943568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125884692","doi":"","title":"State Dependence in Canadian Welfare Participation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Spurious relationship; Generosity; Welfare; Probit model; Economics; Probit; Demographic economics; Welfare state; Ordered probit; Survey data collection; Econometrics; Labour economics; Political science; Politics; Statistics","score_opus":0.03827047680608512,"score_gpt":0.3427748831406783,"score_spread":0.30450440633459314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125884692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919668,0.0003269102,0.00037204442,0.0005210521,0.000005910513,0.00002183313,0.0026723882,0.00001552536,0.0040975753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962004,0.00018446111,0.00012447077,0.000035746358,0.0000022846914,0.000008790559,0.0013237328,0.0000062182044,0.002113894],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985203,0.00018616708,0.00004363984,0.00019051175,0.00030227122,0.00075706263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966959,0.0007648015,0.00070952217,0.00017782432,0.0010476562,0.00060417404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015676559,0.00022660608,0.00049208594,0.002294127,0.002889474,0.002120966,0.0010387691,0.0004908735,0.006176413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007715087,0.0002479654,0.00076503376,0.004215814,0.0010432681,0.0005936188,0.0015270363,0.00082311506,0.00028118887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001560732,0.000055148506,0.9702599,0.00003024772,0.00009918035,0.000103096434,0.0038759385,0.0035541041,0.00019266662,0.0041861054,0.0017545483,0.015733019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010489535,0.00001772583,0.9871,0.000039595172,0.00004098454,0.000034989298,0.0030187804,0.0051407088,0.0001377628,0.0006744889,0.0037531438,0.000031372852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99310887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03059312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03059312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02182709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22196966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125900551","doi":"","title":"Competing Premarital Investments","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Economics; Investment (military); Marriage market; Quality (philosophy); Monetary economics; Labour economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0172126542696618,"score_gpt":0.256509574586167,"score_spread":0.23929692031650523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125900551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85146874,0.0015780084,0.013051277,0.0008656401,0.000044063414,0.000050928047,0.0004638792,0.000025362438,0.13245218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98515785,0.00034531683,0.0007376741,0.000052027313,0.000013258243,0.000013905482,0.000095261545,0.000004681141,0.013580016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945325,0.00014806938,0.000016547618,0.000073736664,0.00008470236,0.00022364079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981365,0.00081773946,0.00037682027,0.00014361872,0.0001453711,0.00037984346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010025296,0.00042724152,0.00042581477,0.00047505234,0.00085804175,0.0024022222,0.0010228403,0.0009708663,0.024397505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042393864,0.00020312189,0.00039079826,0.0006123559,0.00074744085,0.0015147503,0.0012039308,0.0010730773,0.0008702916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041811654,0.00046750973,0.052263647,0.0001266635,0.00009658517,0.000763864,0.0010665073,0.016499396,0.0022763656,0.87912303,0.0022062429,0.044691946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020835082,0.001425526,0.110347696,0.00023276398,0.0002759676,0.002153555,0.005528045,0.1409341,0.0051709968,0.6872596,0.046336763,0.00012661594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025919569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050989934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024397505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015563908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007519026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08161777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125906062","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2004233","title":"Fiscal Incidence When Both Individual Welfare and Family Structure Matter: The Case of Subsidization of Home-Care for the Elderly","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Saskatchewan Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Welfare; Incidence (geometry); Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Public economics; Medicine; Market economy","score_opus":0.010391900850998084,"score_gpt":0.25622941449650855,"score_spread":0.24583751364551046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125906062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.985002,0.0002790307,0.00043451696,0.0042738626,0.000027225717,0.000023500383,0.0002866039,0.000010593654,0.009662768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906176,0.000075898766,0.000046094014,0.000063859254,0.000018721268,0.000004693485,0.000048034388,0.0000018854332,0.00067911757],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804866,0.00039978477,0.00006900843,0.00012482103,0.00008314977,0.0012745764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98868936,0.005714803,0.0029694866,0.00040647044,0.00052923796,0.0016906947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038598673,0.00022840474,0.0012131401,0.0011331447,0.0018949538,0.0040681805,0.0013912441,0.002393544,0.009694532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016366791,0.00037439942,0.00079978403,0.0012067553,0.0021333992,0.002467821,0.0027339957,0.0026157335,0.00026672063],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025517691,0.0016028854,0.7842386,0.00014428135,0.00027468923,0.005355812,0.0029677034,0.01883549,0.00073274144,0.15162648,0.008128251,0.023541294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042182484,0.0007207091,0.7858643,0.0001322808,0.00068588066,0.0018315418,0.043512784,0.05321733,0.0009178916,0.10581026,0.0067369207,0.0001481982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05426812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073109254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05426812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003236992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035364307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107904494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125906403","doi":"","title":"Women and Children First, but Only If the Men are Union Members: Hiring Halls and Delinquent Child-Supporters","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Notre Dame journal of law, ethics & public policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Enforcement; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law enforcement; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03238912766278746,"score_gpt":0.30564929519459794,"score_spread":0.2732601675318105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125906403","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.274783,0.029283702,0.0014939082,0.399581,0.0026595776,0.000057738303,0.0000813511,0.000039118244,0.29202065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8465791,0.0074671297,0.0005531879,0.054059196,0.0005709993,0.000059258306,0.000020604106,0.000039015395,0.09065143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979526,0.0007848684,0.000035351324,0.00020510641,0.00023110975,0.0007909129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988918,0.00035539723,0.00012557462,0.000036525933,0.000072776886,0.0005179234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022712962,0.00033863334,0.00035844775,0.00054646237,0.019664962,0.0070366263,0.00059468165,0.0048811906,0.0068159676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028113693,0.0004078135,0.00016886096,0.00042625907,0.02261405,0.0051292595,0.005652841,0.004964025,0.00068422675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045234905,0.00011297953,0.014887178,0.000068353045,0.00000777379,0.0021972796,0.21761607,0.000046852365,0.0005503122,0.6320907,0.09685186,0.03552551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002720815,0.00009808633,0.011472078,0.00058528734,0.0000141623805,0.0012114351,0.3367921,0.00007658375,0.00034066555,0.040168125,0.60917956,0.000034716748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06173896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14096145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06173896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004609625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066530965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12275922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125930175","doi":"","title":"A Collective Model of Household Behavior with Private Public Goods: Theory and Some Evidence from U.S. Data","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Consumer Expenditure Survey; Private good; Microeconomics; Revealed preference; Process (computing); Pareto principle; Survey data collection; Substitution (logic); Empirical evidence; Public economics; Econometrics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14213377700701232,"score_gpt":0.3530704086254579,"score_spread":0.21093663161844559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125930175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9315698,0.0011264358,0.054002017,0.0028385406,0.000023008763,0.000072741095,0.0014925803,0.00013361157,0.0087413825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99384236,0.00035515855,0.004305956,0.0000797926,0.000020792764,0.00005695123,0.0006122878,0.000012772332,0.0007138453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985335,0.00076248817,0.00006227928,0.00039480615,0.00014511043,0.00010186802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97968227,0.013877962,0.0035629338,0.0020878778,0.0005103757,0.00027855844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041186237,0.00039078394,0.0010306981,0.0011260932,0.00085947535,0.002407276,0.0012555185,0.0012115806,0.0069040344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012676241,0.00033525392,0.00082836405,0.0035362493,0.0016630137,0.0032260872,0.00094697275,0.0011446761,0.0007104124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054897595,0.0005728357,0.46329507,0.00040102736,0.00050471356,0.00079383585,0.0069142072,0.12914345,0.0005414884,0.30698174,0.011111955,0.07919072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001645792,0.00033410845,0.17009999,0.00019398422,0.00019590171,0.00064975617,0.0056287674,0.45170295,0.00042793885,0.3563759,0.014122381,0.000103849794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011112745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009259895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011112745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017964134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045639664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023096323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125953452","doi":"10.1111/jpet.12327","title":"Nursing home choices, family bargaining and optimal policy in a Hotelling economy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Bequest; Economics; Bargaining power; Overlapping generations model; Nursing homes; Power (physics); Labour economics; Decentralization; Robustness (evolution); Microeconomics; Nursing; Market economy; Medicine","score_opus":0.015129207244760846,"score_gpt":0.22666956709044436,"score_spread":0.2115403598456835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125953452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7744695,0.0013321417,0.15576564,0.004796293,0.000097564225,0.00008621097,0.0005116521,0.00009468846,0.06284627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838537,0.0005323289,0.0036158087,0.00011893496,0.00002116028,0.000043344848,0.00005671897,0.000009572577,0.011748461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995432,0.00022790827,0.000008590559,0.0000524477,0.000028177063,0.00013982387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935204,0.00028847213,0.00014279413,0.000028907429,0.00003751503,0.00015018223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010524697,0.0004974469,0.0009178765,0.0004469774,0.0009680968,0.0016499903,0.0009788615,0.0013916098,0.007816869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018289158,0.00035991776,0.00061208423,0.0005715071,0.0014968708,0.0014107777,0.000981034,0.0010373361,0.0005314534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001965698,0.00014389407,0.0042048097,0.000057631583,0.00006952445,0.00043607733,0.0003630611,0.46821567,0.00052954885,0.5178839,0.0019940103,0.0059052766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016772856,0.00012614571,0.00244101,0.00004236436,0.000031018702,0.00010365189,0.0009569754,0.7026936,0.00018234111,0.28965965,0.0035531002,0.000042432086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020264488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015290357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020264488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035060134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013442176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040293038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126011823","doi":"","title":"Tax Options for Childcare that Encourage Work, Flexibility, Choice, Fairness and Quality","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"C.D. Howe Institute Commentary","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Taxable income; Earnings; Subsidy; Equity (law); Public economics; Tax deduction; Tax credit; Flexibility (engineering); Business; Income tax; Economics; Labour economics; Revenue; Work (physics); State income tax; Taxpayer; Tax reform; Gross income; Finance; Accounting","score_opus":0.1254694619071878,"score_gpt":0.38170642175248637,"score_spread":0.2562369598452986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126011823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48053262,0.0008154256,0.02550751,0.00868028,0.0002272784,0.0011910064,0.008975835,0.000532992,0.47353694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9512644,0.00043710603,0.011831806,0.0003675172,0.000017008122,0.00022094575,0.0015897766,0.000051788138,0.03421956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984345,0.0003570096,0.000027092816,0.000071124705,0.0004158739,0.00069439475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981577,0.000250102,0.0001608601,0.0002583484,0.0007026234,0.0004703974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013255898,0.00045060346,0.0003414065,0.00080165983,0.0032226678,0.0024790154,0.0013655612,0.000788471,0.023230605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058741644,0.00021990933,0.00069760944,0.0017912246,0.0013916085,0.00097001065,0.0010843064,0.0009829833,0.001248629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087056187,0.00087874173,0.10394819,0.00033086725,0.00013876088,0.00049870874,0.002780723,0.15462898,0.0031714572,0.48637432,0.09255379,0.153825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087262614,0.0004679146,0.25592843,0.0005170893,0.00020207107,0.00047479486,0.010278079,0.12008512,0.0017430659,0.10838909,0.500687,0.00035470937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.884553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.964205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.884553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025125958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021737112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23225373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126068539","doi":"","title":"Dynamic intrahousehold bargaining, matrimonial property law and suicide in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Property (philosophy); Economics; Demographic economics; Natural experiment; Survey data collection; Property rights; Suicide rates; Political science; Law; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Microeconomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.023114978885678563,"score_gpt":0.22749909702201304,"score_spread":0.20438411813633448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126068539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7049138,0.0045181233,0.002048167,0.032171503,0.00018736668,0.00013443053,0.00081576227,0.000047029393,0.2551638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97526205,0.0010718892,0.00025121658,0.0004700242,0.00001690399,0.00001128573,0.00010224331,0.0000115951525,0.022802932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798536,0.00016106502,0.00004322024,0.00015854678,0.00034019156,0.0013117386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997586,0.0004639019,0.00019260206,0.00011475224,0.0007616913,0.000880964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014656013,0.00025408444,0.00063599146,0.0013407546,0.015385533,0.0049624825,0.0021263731,0.0023398965,0.015302094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006694398,0.00028978792,0.00055442384,0.0026324652,0.00563658,0.0016939241,0.002560654,0.0034085717,0.00037116668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002201879,0.00020532635,0.042139344,0.00009186739,0.00008096992,0.0011829821,0.012275631,0.010196928,0.00024822797,0.8621244,0.029717144,0.041516896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039275724,0.00015685371,0.16606209,0.0008196872,0.00027430773,0.0007022482,0.10436387,0.056528203,0.0010571597,0.40118745,0.2680725,0.0003829064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99402785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12090998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12090998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12160471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8772674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126093888","doi":"","title":"How does the marriage market clear? An empirical framework","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Marriage market; Matching (statistics); Statistic; Economics; Famine; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.05006823848720034,"score_gpt":0.36068231109182014,"score_spread":0.3106140726046198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126093888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5333125,0.032906003,0.066619776,0.12695421,0.00031043423,0.000507135,0.0046084323,0.00027512628,0.23450641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797035,0.004811673,0.0042025493,0.001798869,0.00039733155,0.00018688811,0.0008625703,0.000038602087,0.007997963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736685,0.0011973811,0.0001252346,0.00049054506,0.00042423024,0.00039583826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98493975,0.009508632,0.0030990224,0.0008048166,0.00083236146,0.00081538915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058614276,0.0004309669,0.0016735817,0.0033227182,0.0029764757,0.0076586013,0.0023691177,0.0032278493,0.029084682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025313187,0.0005291682,0.0007576261,0.0058009643,0.006410184,0.01342415,0.0044576745,0.003693365,0.0014453977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005060717,0.00024765564,0.021653771,0.0001327228,0.00003963926,0.00023199688,0.0012827717,0.0020397112,0.00005342925,0.94463116,0.004555386,0.025081303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057812824,0.00007245401,0.02205763,0.0002676342,0.000044970253,0.00017366429,0.0055022337,0.015007493,0.000081334365,0.9263617,0.03032588,0.00004713314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008869788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048063826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029084682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024526126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09729797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126097994","doi":"","title":"Household Labour Supply and the Marriage Market in the UK, 1991-2008","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Homophily; Marriage market; Labour supply; Economics; Wage; Labour economics; British Household Panel Survey; Marital status; Leisure time; Supply and demand; Demographic economics; Production (economics); Panel data; Time-use survey; Sociology; Econometrics; Work (physics); Microeconomics; Demography","score_opus":0.03946600235502574,"score_gpt":0.31695866012924845,"score_spread":0.2774926577742227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126097994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724291,0.0023735634,0.00036119332,0.00090554246,0.00003485224,0.00002214492,0.020292021,0.00001406448,0.0035675727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800324,0.0015449414,0.00023353506,0.00015548349,0.00002802633,0.000039522707,0.011147994,0.00000925664,0.006808925],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992779,0.00013004594,0.00011694555,0.00013270132,0.00016633492,0.00017606006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971668,0.0004953661,0.0015630452,0.00015625071,0.0003797117,0.00023889779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000697318,0.00019605362,0.000378441,0.0016409352,0.00045269198,0.000981198,0.0004113588,0.00059545104,0.0069650253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049996483,0.00028891783,0.00033322285,0.00400707,0.00038418238,0.0009812681,0.0014424655,0.0005783213,0.0016682785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003405083,0.00012024326,0.93599856,0.00038689974,0.00014986667,0.0004744898,0.006218962,0.0023412528,0.00039387276,0.0028594579,0.016068807,0.034647033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018126872,0.000049783648,0.9894084,0.00010819318,0.00001875236,0.00008410389,0.001938506,0.0005614993,0.000056464527,0.00024782275,0.0074938587,0.000014580861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2622476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39662054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2622476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018694513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078688643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5214423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126106421","doi":"","title":"Joint Taxation and the Labour Supply of Married Women: Evidence from the Canadian Tax Reform of 1988","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Tax reform; Tax credit; Labour economics; State income tax; Liberian dollar; Value-added tax; Indirect tax; Tax rate; Direct tax; Ad valorem tax; Double taxation; Monetary economics; Public economics; Finance","score_opus":0.034720540564375964,"score_gpt":0.2972570126611121,"score_spread":0.26253647209673614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126106421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97538054,0.0062690806,0.00007330979,0.0027775257,0.000026873733,0.000040986502,0.0028376419,0.000003289232,0.012590753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901002,0.0052750595,0.00006258595,0.00019389876,0.000021379523,0.000011811781,0.0009397311,0.0000019000972,0.0033934643],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998808,0.00011343109,0.00004611669,0.000092459755,0.0005067273,0.00043329876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946873,0.00096984504,0.0015951621,0.00020311752,0.0016895214,0.00085507106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013133435,0.0001750547,0.00044907434,0.0018687128,0.0028058991,0.0012638073,0.00086224335,0.0006479961,0.005602035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008567374,0.00028902912,0.00023878222,0.0048290435,0.001290281,0.00050761236,0.0011029841,0.0006674426,0.00039299836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005469518,0.00017470629,0.93892723,0.00018325099,0.00012037542,0.00026990872,0.007141288,0.0002837941,0.00021988754,0.0027151245,0.00423554,0.04518196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028403683,0.000041295483,0.98782164,0.000097637065,0.000047099118,0.000053500393,0.00481609,0.000091829366,0.00007775974,0.00028624616,0.006626862,0.000011657126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.975691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98825735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02430898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013816062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017712839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10024297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127788054","doi":"10.33774/apsa-2021-v6s60","title":"Class, Social Mobility, and Voting: Evidence from Historical Voting Records","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"American Political Science Association","keywords":"Voting; Gentry; Incentive; Ballot; Secret ballot; Disapproval voting; Social class; Political science; Instant-runoff voting; Voting behavior; Turnout; Demographic economics; Economics; Labour economics; Law; Politics; Market economy","score_opus":0.06291160819509434,"score_gpt":0.31236550785038997,"score_spread":0.24945389965529563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127788054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974383,0.00034328393,0.00016154868,0.00007541569,0.0000053922586,0.000004474741,0.0007313947,0.0000016840622,0.0012384531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99843615,0.00021989034,0.00007389762,0.000010288401,0.000010184978,0.000006401686,0.00075893826,0.0000020354944,0.00048216604],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893945,0.00044732436,0.000112413414,0.00019771623,0.00014201012,0.00016104919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893016,0.0032862439,0.0051223724,0.00091929635,0.0008481293,0.00052226824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015947365,0.00012188718,0.0003263194,0.0020222275,0.00086177513,0.00084352324,0.00048250073,0.00032119424,0.0046541556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008331058,0.00023564642,0.00019259003,0.003455334,0.00083065743,0.0010053206,0.00088945223,0.00048320566,0.0007492173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062684274,0.000022345612,0.9932876,0.00002555402,0.000059278256,0.00004681025,0.0018342911,0.00007100905,0.00007243528,0.00029465684,0.000256858,0.003966411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023290584,0.000022050337,0.9980446,0.000018718305,0.000013639418,0.00003532988,0.00078441616,0.00011161291,0.000037547143,0.000084954845,0.0008402197,0.000004580189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03354995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073591426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03354995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043448905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017294186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06670934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128297183","doi":"10.1093/esr/jcaa074","title":"Partners’ Relative Income and the Risk of Union Dissolution in Two Institutional Contexts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Sociological Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Grantová Agentura České Republiky","keywords":"Cohabitation; Demographic economics; Context (archaeology); Economics; Period (music); Demography; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.05523111676532622,"score_gpt":0.35981823886970415,"score_spread":0.30458712210437794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128297183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99606127,0.0025006928,0.00007132811,0.000096785465,0.000005629143,0.0000045319734,0.00007058195,7.816719e-7,0.0011884443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992455,0.0005514524,0.000021906528,0.000005513336,0.0000024271972,0.0000012691269,0.000034919605,2.917759e-7,0.0001367064],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993691,0.00024806787,0.00002909977,0.00007571279,0.0001274896,0.00015059786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984018,0.00041803453,0.00066150393,0.000053648826,0.00017230083,0.0002927112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013732414,0.00012523895,0.00027070954,0.0015311446,0.0009381911,0.0011997757,0.00045151717,0.00031247607,0.0022965348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043391176,0.00010519579,0.00029488935,0.0017184297,0.00091482635,0.00046119088,0.0013386576,0.0003896137,0.00009599425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010144493,0.00004888263,0.98731995,0.000028903421,0.0000868481,0.00014674925,0.0014367589,0.000118013195,0.000058612466,0.00074531033,0.000091787195,0.009816659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011127881,0.000034023353,0.9956078,0.000035200188,0.000026274965,0.0000952511,0.0035093047,0.000110041874,0.000026164395,0.00014753075,0.0004032986,0.000004016215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08698495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.103719115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08698495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015919844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012461174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17295724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129960758","doi":"10.1515/openps-2021-0008","title":"Factors That Militate Against Women Participation in Politics in Enugu State","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Political Science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Global Affairs Canada","keywords":"Politics; Intimidation; State (computer science); Focus group; Democracy; Political science; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Sociology; Business; Economics; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.07705232166488951,"score_gpt":0.3808015810976748,"score_spread":0.3037492594327853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129960758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952958,0.00016486795,0.000055690583,0.00033387367,0.0000076088686,0.000008123532,0.000008394824,0.0000018720848,0.00412371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993224,0.00007215903,0.000029625618,0.000028232076,0.000003928529,0.0000057560787,0.000005163521,7.3907296e-7,0.00053206173],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982241,0.0010689141,0.000048637252,0.00006771282,0.00014762883,0.00044293742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984723,0.00052460306,0.00048692958,0.000045633496,0.000114715265,0.0003558407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016373246,0.00019054899,0.00022812572,0.00072032027,0.004329664,0.0021717823,0.00035822892,0.00051087624,0.0041893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028317054,0.00016237464,0.000119150885,0.00060956896,0.0024379315,0.0006554892,0.0018267323,0.0005064628,0.00021777416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013183756,0.00015884319,0.44490075,0.00020946049,0.000021822754,0.0023630883,0.5185043,0.00006961172,0.0031548182,0.004706753,0.0010349554,0.024743814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026964485,0.000081208134,0.24998593,0.0001067363,0.000007589029,0.00042384537,0.73767173,0.000076599346,0.00031925482,0.00037484427,0.010939156,0.000010508285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0121379495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03033725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0121379495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001091606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014224043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024134576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130395636","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-66085-7_3","title":"The Age of Negative Income Tax Experimentation (the 70s)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Exploring the basic income guarantee","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Basic income; Gross income; Public economics; Work (physics); Poverty; Cash; Economics; Income tax; Adjusted gross income; State income tax; Business; Labour economics; Tax reform; Economic growth; Finance; Engineering; Microeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.054761236274715824,"score_gpt":0.2877417531738437,"score_spread":0.23298051689912788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130395636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044965826,0.026308103,0.0005274214,0.03863768,0.001915392,0.000027941373,0.00014176934,0.000033282613,0.8874426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5798831,0.02365101,0.0005015429,0.015590239,0.001521147,0.00007939224,0.00015185495,0.000085950545,0.37853578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930525,0.00014590306,0.000014674697,0.00007069542,0.00015450492,0.00030897965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995492,0.000124653,0.00005850118,0.00003300793,0.000087652654,0.00014685723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015615128,0.00024363672,0.00025944726,0.0007335002,0.003977622,0.004459666,0.00043142276,0.0021192105,0.0071561453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026067446,0.00019497871,0.00017921397,0.0007139641,0.009048091,0.005779063,0.0036184965,0.004667078,0.001337685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020153639,0.000032175456,0.00064345216,0.000016505963,0.0000011161864,0.00009979748,0.009090547,0.00002978972,0.00012382814,0.9214879,0.0384459,0.030008867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055488367,0.000023517772,0.0043109218,0.0002532545,0.0000023373298,0.00019448904,0.005958557,0.00003417847,0.00021749192,0.09893207,0.89005727,0.000010397801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023263343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038708888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023263343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036125465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004884742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046255827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133483828","doi":"","title":"The Neoliberal Politics of the Child: Violence Against Women and Mother/Child Welfare, 1990-2012","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"York University Digital Library (York University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Politics; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.004777932048866751,"score_gpt":0.17202132900860964,"score_spread":0.16724339695974288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133483828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79822105,0.02781397,0.0003290406,0.060028534,0.00040173772,0.00014322296,0.0025292428,0.000033411437,0.110499844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9304623,0.016686976,0.00030992314,0.0033728525,0.00008286758,0.00007622596,0.00056981243,0.000023075225,0.048415978],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827945,0.00015527688,0.0000453321,0.000099060126,0.0005222103,0.00089871744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833435,0.0001259615,0.0002721892,0.000029942626,0.00056743546,0.0006702068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010109402,0.00022223129,0.00025867688,0.0013897271,0.012772895,0.0040272875,0.0010936612,0.00090545247,0.003550356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024990875,0.00030315312,0.00020388135,0.0033028603,0.005332972,0.0011460667,0.0032265272,0.0017693216,0.0001799053],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011920239,0.0000756508,0.1878141,0.00062586146,0.000042861695,0.0011737326,0.59593624,0.00033565264,0.0006959602,0.057136398,0.054147176,0.10189718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009611131,0.000024669953,0.3635373,0.00060477253,0.00002147465,0.0002087371,0.2408653,0.00008348365,0.00023765434,0.0007503822,0.39362487,0.000031788728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99867815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1916947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18117373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93751955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134134834","doi":"10.1215/00703370-9009367","title":"Revealing the Concealed Effect of Top Earnings on the Gender Gap in the Economic Value of Higher Education in the United States, 1980–2017","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Decile; Educational attainment; Demographic economics; Economics; Wage; Labour economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Disadvantage; Inequality; Value (mathematics); Gender gap; Higher education; Political science; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.0243861302137813,"score_gpt":0.3055006730651072,"score_spread":0.2811145428513259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134134834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851061,0.00086842524,0.0003658099,0.0011921237,0.00007700806,0.0000064361143,0.006350873,0.000009134521,0.0060240636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949809,0.00031195334,0.00008914272,0.000117109645,0.000054114633,0.00001021447,0.0031327903,0.000005237415,0.0012985636],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995315,0.00008730531,0.000031199866,0.00007362726,0.00009458446,0.00018181105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978465,0.0006623186,0.00076875306,0.00016784409,0.00032105128,0.00023356332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011017486,0.00011540461,0.0001802592,0.0009965815,0.00041855243,0.00068958395,0.00025534022,0.0002649303,0.002431969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033668512,0.00007173935,0.00025417362,0.0011937306,0.00048211133,0.00057447643,0.0011025629,0.0007307871,0.0003116166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010287972,0.00003816961,0.9680145,0.000039771654,0.000057657864,0.000074830605,0.0014717604,0.00036250878,0.00014031019,0.0044109887,0.008322666,0.016964061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002548898,0.000020186368,0.9897731,0.000046181816,0.00002379949,0.000022687076,0.0020992504,0.000317444,0.00020752911,0.00071470044,0.006766693,0.000005809955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07329362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10608425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07329362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057653646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000783904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14573401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134176408","doi":"10.3368/jhr.0521-11673r1","title":"Female Executives and the Motherhood Penalty","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Human Resources","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Quarter (Canadian coin); Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Representation (politics); Empirical evidence; Psychology; Labour economics; Business; Economics; Accounting; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.02939140249461235,"score_gpt":0.30134120980301765,"score_spread":0.2719498073084053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134176408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99040085,0.0002388816,0.00014626596,0.0027306397,0.000037309183,0.00001025532,0.00033812365,0.0000042684414,0.006093299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986381,0.000042852196,0.00003741929,0.00017302009,0.00002518694,0.000004323496,0.0000793815,7.279372e-7,0.0009989465],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890447,0.00039139183,0.000054599364,0.0001045089,0.00019923602,0.00034572062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829421,0.0044509685,0.009608234,0.0005814085,0.00060867437,0.0018086164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00179079,0.00010790253,0.00019571967,0.0004627189,0.0007839432,0.0008320481,0.00028340146,0.0005317045,0.012810693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014525351,0.000078215606,0.00018942766,0.00041725827,0.0005357611,0.00060025,0.00086401973,0.00079996197,0.0006046889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107087944,0.00015358024,0.98434806,0.000008912339,0.000015683405,0.00016671757,0.00038530948,0.00011310612,0.00007160805,0.0017580461,0.0023197015,0.010552271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017448423,0.00019715047,0.9904184,0.00003776815,0.000016159776,0.00031498875,0.0030810344,0.00048507983,0.00022063743,0.0015116966,0.0036933436,0.0000062397703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028009403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050408756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012810693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004469793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006095051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042856097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136351527","doi":"10.3386/w28556","title":"The Effects of Child Tax Benefits on Poverty and Labor Supply: Evidence from the Canada Child Benefit and Universal Child Care Benefit","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Statistics Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Poverty; Child poverty; Economics; Child care; Labour economics; Public economics; Demographic economics; Medicine; Economic growth; Nursing","score_opus":0.06330361616147395,"score_gpt":0.3704616382766847,"score_spread":0.30715802211521076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136351527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9484861,0.010810559,0.00016756315,0.008610634,0.00006516828,0.00013817153,0.010391966,0.000009542413,0.021320364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860888,0.005680954,0.00015719002,0.0008819592,0.00003327219,0.0000506576,0.002504675,0.0000059499553,0.004596645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724835,0.00038581388,0.00006700368,0.0001628038,0.0011362454,0.0009997073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99063766,0.0022489338,0.0025308155,0.00024688742,0.0025869585,0.0017487007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018074096,0.00025188757,0.0005978662,0.0014658881,0.0020548443,0.0011236736,0.0013754946,0.0005898387,0.0049105496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010473993,0.0002224944,0.000694738,0.0027998711,0.0013064033,0.00045361384,0.0016432601,0.0011101,0.0002042931],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000982284,0.00040820814,0.92657655,0.0005072464,0.00061215134,0.00017589233,0.0023233106,0.0013944271,0.00022646882,0.004669381,0.011206663,0.05091735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084756546,0.00009503714,0.98707914,0.00026746182,0.00035585556,0.000025104886,0.002916672,0.00035759705,0.00017364201,0.00032984882,0.008300765,0.000014243579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023005068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023005068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0537336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16691422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136616391","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3801258","title":"Respondent Biases in Household Surveys","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Econometrics; Survey research; Statistics; Geography; Economics; Psychology; Environmental science; Political science; Mathematics; Socioeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.03905010065579958,"score_gpt":0.2970857523110988,"score_spread":0.25803565165529924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136616391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82383907,0.008133422,0.08661262,0.016892148,0.0010014928,0.0016991354,0.0029153319,0.00016090221,0.058745816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843067,0.0011718713,0.0066364575,0.003302529,0.00035526883,0.000704942,0.00060979667,0.00003803361,0.0028744289],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.65241295,0.3138503,0.008806969,0.0064469334,0.015238512,0.0032443844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.33854857,0.56691206,0.04736711,0.03169182,0.014332153,0.0011483182],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19956508,0.0004851778,0.0009464253,0.003356269,0.001777173,0.0030845278,0.0016718099,0.002693129,0.0052492595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4784186,0.0007533263,0.0009313946,0.0048844735,0.0029948645,0.0033935613,0.0037486192,0.00168956,0.00087374187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008669736,0.00020079696,0.76878095,0.0013753398,0.0013277382,0.00033991635,0.02855263,0.0019224195,0.0003152049,0.057930194,0.013041229,0.12534663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004687147,0.0008646813,0.68275595,0.0035539232,0.0018949856,0.001374093,0.050169867,0.021165272,0.007312774,0.15006049,0.08018057,0.00019864542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00836325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074121477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80043495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022432588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018084301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9870787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140541876","doi":"","title":"Control over Money in Marriage","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Control (management); Consumption (sociology); Division of labour; Position (finance); Economics; Set (abstract data type); Demographic economics; Political science; Finance; Sociology; Law; Management","score_opus":0.029575471764759324,"score_gpt":0.3298953049503638,"score_spread":0.30031983318560446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140541876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8991786,0.0028807938,0.0012198547,0.0023915267,0.000056689063,0.000026038759,0.0001652209,0.00000941794,0.094071805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979182,0.00030609968,0.000047260968,0.00007895596,0.00002186385,0.000004439153,0.000023148217,0.0000015513145,0.0015984568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825317,0.00073718396,0.00007326647,0.00019871704,0.0002668118,0.00047082952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966779,0.0013902074,0.0009037962,0.0002449986,0.0001358975,0.00064724864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013251833,0.00017689806,0.00032665182,0.00068161596,0.0017511585,0.00254944,0.0004353159,0.00054050103,0.010560898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007222841,0.0001257931,0.0001854164,0.0011919502,0.004498352,0.001601318,0.002095116,0.00078338466,0.00027387726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005185473,0.00038236816,0.36595258,0.00023440017,0.00010238466,0.0008890169,0.048765033,0.0014686389,0.0007324695,0.45199472,0.004357864,0.12460193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010733597,0.00054232473,0.5973498,0.00049619726,0.000101421974,0.00082493003,0.059169333,0.0023292408,0.0009985681,0.23958005,0.09840856,0.00009225281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073425933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061203963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010560898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012178731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008398524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03532976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140646218","doi":"10.7202/1076386ar","title":"EST-CE PARCE QU’ILS SONT MARIÉS QUE LES HOMMES MARIÉS GAGNENT PLUS QUE LES HOMMES NON-MARIÉS ?","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.04281057097141719,"score_gpt":0.27758104439823017,"score_spread":0.23477047342681298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140646218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7083645,0.008619338,0.0065352684,0.04535985,0.0007288999,0.000041097665,0.00036297785,0.000040421746,0.22994761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769008,0.0020778044,0.00088579115,0.001985955,0.000107629945,0.000021295502,0.000044216547,0.000020052414,0.01795656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984322,0.00063619914,0.000031801585,0.00039946917,0.00020582943,0.00029447483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756575,0.0009896128,0.0005178005,0.00023396235,0.0003213591,0.0003716468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028267927,0.00028688254,0.00044689886,0.0008300545,0.0027784838,0.0032043988,0.0005495289,0.0012887715,0.013747351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008304151,0.00023390734,0.00033071,0.0007428578,0.006173528,0.0041787424,0.0018078715,0.0014220631,0.0016561775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040141834,0.00013374646,0.14322832,0.00059401506,0.00027602553,0.0014070289,0.0984108,0.0004557767,0.0027207767,0.6164128,0.014518333,0.12144095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056351408,0.00031963663,0.23026049,0.0012860446,0.00020014368,0.0020250147,0.2026393,0.000634406,0.001999677,0.22416754,0.3362911,0.00012027206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010697472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015994798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013747351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016411319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012374694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045989513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142030293","doi":"","title":"The Effect of Paid Parental Leave on Breastfeeding, Parental Health and Behavior","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parental leave; Breastfeeding; Duration (music); Demographic economics; Health insurance; Health plan; Demography; Psychology; Political science; Business; Medicine; Economics; Economic growth; Sociology; Health care; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.017110593418254934,"score_gpt":0.2597474897810522,"score_spread":0.24263689636279728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142030293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939851,0.0010935791,0.0000820984,0.00086625625,0.000014386892,0.000007163212,0.0003418024,0.0000029364728,0.0036068375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983334,0.0003211179,0.000050306793,0.000075734664,0.00000927812,0.0000047995914,0.0001280998,0.0000015931682,0.0010757339],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814725,0.0008648658,0.00003758418,0.00013674784,0.00030841652,0.0005050952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99405813,0.0032754536,0.0012663244,0.00024710348,0.00027578062,0.00087728025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021963103,0.00018092853,0.00030848332,0.0005455275,0.00093264447,0.00096936675,0.00045960394,0.0005858729,0.0054950174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006501149,0.00010195626,0.00041510505,0.0005672492,0.00087848934,0.00034960403,0.00060970604,0.0005759378,0.00024468685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005021389,0.00031824582,0.96610695,0.000043189706,0.00018744334,0.00015177525,0.0021795598,0.00045065093,0.00036870016,0.0016261886,0.0007649074,0.027300218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075452663,0.000096603995,0.9962134,0.000024120594,0.000031352887,0.000018320989,0.0019047753,0.00018622311,0.00007464936,0.00024357173,0.0011940555,0.0000053444687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35199192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47619525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35199192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038084793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029712233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6998862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144124541","doi":"","title":"The Long-Term Effects of a Generous Income Support Program: Unemployment Insurance in New Brunswick and Maine, 1940-1991","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Demographic economics; Term (time); Economics; Differential (mechanical device); Labour economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.07144927795455015,"score_gpt":0.42105690536727985,"score_spread":0.3496076274127297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3144124541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930768,0.0012398314,0.00005033613,0.0009042083,0.000021922739,0.000015176475,0.0035653552,0.0000057189586,0.0011207872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930328,0.000916201,0.00006204504,0.00018598048,0.000017297047,0.000024728673,0.003263759,0.0000041285343,0.0024930458],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928844,0.00011617323,0.000051625797,0.00008528784,0.00010190713,0.00035668848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684465,0.00037262306,0.0013366326,0.00010771388,0.00056313415,0.0007752553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000900267,0.00023844847,0.00040670298,0.0013659599,0.0010994682,0.0011218955,0.0013394591,0.000536641,0.0015327827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029672608,0.00020488886,0.00044139178,0.0024582492,0.000995101,0.0005013293,0.0015703861,0.00089336094,0.0002441476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014347475,0.00007997767,0.99044293,0.00003216159,0.00012085599,0.00017217988,0.0010200625,0.0004003533,0.00022276845,0.0003024786,0.00159896,0.0054638013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012146578,0.000032163523,0.9958786,0.000029198241,0.000057962017,0.000023753582,0.0014653382,0.00017425367,0.000120005745,0.000027920123,0.002170977,0.000007772283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9433508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98149294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056649208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016682066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072484654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12103742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148246334","doi":"10.1257/mac.20200318","title":"Hours, Occupations, and Gender Differences in Labor Market Outcomes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Macroeconomics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nonmarket forces; Narrative; Productivity; Welfare; Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Factor market; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.019440230072018953,"score_gpt":0.28115637086522927,"score_spread":0.2617161407932103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148246334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96378773,0.0013766061,0.0010717124,0.0028825577,0.000044774228,0.0000207607,0.0013864697,0.000011514665,0.029417757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774855,0.00020786037,0.000121144025,0.00012664344,0.000019678257,0.000006589857,0.0002327857,0.000002308616,0.0015344827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996768,0.00011606863,0.000014643631,0.00004471794,0.000062617015,0.0000851649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974596,0.0012443423,0.0007002997,0.00013138569,0.0001129274,0.00035136967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014639727,0.00014369396,0.00018753689,0.00068354537,0.00046537607,0.000871425,0.00023390444,0.00035995894,0.0123733375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045771175,0.000059272945,0.00019602558,0.00075451785,0.00078095665,0.0006150139,0.0007959445,0.0004940543,0.00058068027],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030079414,0.00013710374,0.9064529,0.00006812859,0.0000749925,0.0002503097,0.003248501,0.0016479269,0.00033495456,0.05116986,0.006163255,0.030151205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016681824,0.000108468084,0.9616819,0.00009121097,0.000025149537,0.00011763594,0.005343224,0.0015905269,0.00016991932,0.023738459,0.0071000946,0.000016751732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005629729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008228468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0123733375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005202053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002672111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041392922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149499303","doi":"","title":"The Long-Term Effects of California’s 2004 Paid Family Leave Act on Women’s Careers: Evidence from U.S. Tax Data","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Parental leave; Quarter (Canadian coin); Maternity leave; Demographic economics; Work hours; Wage; Labour economics; Economics; Work (physics); Hourly wage; Panel data; Demography; Psychology; Working hours; National Longitudinal Surveys; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.1994638465709567,"score_gpt":0.4500888277798329,"score_spread":0.2506249812088762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149499303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827837,0.0031943591,0.00007542272,0.0021348665,0.00007690399,0.000034320365,0.0050301044,0.000007542031,0.0066628493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917834,0.0020247905,0.00007243071,0.00045530446,0.000094043266,0.00003694061,0.0038788063,0.000004140604,0.0016502794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960204,0.001460955,0.000290937,0.00038525136,0.0012770207,0.00056547875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9465912,0.020801716,0.023056407,0.0021185342,0.0040042503,0.0034279071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004751295,0.00020753988,0.0003786157,0.0018084974,0.0015337791,0.0015795038,0.0012532037,0.0007763178,0.004038469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018466966,0.00032701358,0.00060215354,0.0025574933,0.0010313002,0.0007306506,0.0011959655,0.001386116,0.00040070256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046718048,0.00040477878,0.98374027,0.000082165716,0.00029246658,0.00007603103,0.00041922563,0.00030426768,0.00003198705,0.0002813501,0.0043761204,0.009524235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026581978,0.00012334256,0.99639064,0.00007212093,0.000083329614,0.000019477062,0.00083524303,0.000118657874,0.00003941513,0.000041816213,0.0022422099,0.000007199239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23124453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34851417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23124453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027236184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028263747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45979708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151058323","doi":"10.1007/s00355-021-01379-y","title":"Childlessness, childfreeness and compensation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Childlessness; Fertility; Imperfect; Social policy; Compensation (psychology); Economics; Consumption (sociology); Demographic economics; Population; Psychology; Social psychology; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.01721279559738977,"score_gpt":0.27670633269590306,"score_spread":0.2594935370985133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151058323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97444195,0.0021250332,0.00010178547,0.0069502443,0.000060944414,0.000008747123,0.00007368643,0.000002533956,0.01623499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985655,0.00031433254,0.000011445108,0.00008027372,0.000022966738,0.000002611954,0.000010786273,6.7670055e-7,0.0009913775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883825,0.00044476136,0.000030494493,0.00004794644,0.00011291494,0.0005256526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652314,0.001159504,0.0007323809,0.00008277901,0.00014720073,0.0013550554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013596215,0.00017600786,0.0003026711,0.0011431163,0.0026318217,0.0019566435,0.0005428533,0.0009857616,0.009664272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004318373,0.00011299794,0.00028318187,0.0011677337,0.0046876944,0.0011245077,0.0016186561,0.0011607092,0.00016910734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005273956,0.0017235158,0.8268744,0.00007888403,0.00010343253,0.0007642929,0.01930748,0.00050590053,0.00022370317,0.10593689,0.0034508898,0.040503252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050478793,0.00021629038,0.90097773,0.00017320781,0.000051295337,0.00031834043,0.06562292,0.00066997384,0.0001457901,0.022150058,0.009598295,0.000025586973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03477267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072198465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03477267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002414268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033122213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06914055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152681186","doi":"10.1007/s43545-021-00103-y","title":"Examining the family dynamics of the Canadian gender income gap","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SN Social Sciences","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Demographic economics; Gender gap; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.09316495389115503,"score_gpt":0.3166461620503981,"score_spread":0.22348120815924305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152681186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9440202,0.0022757836,0.00016201008,0.007917964,0.00007376997,0.000031787786,0.0009478427,0.000009753011,0.044560872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947631,0.0009792972,0.000116550604,0.00025476105,0.000009431388,0.000014169105,0.00016379546,0.0000067756596,0.003692112],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841726,0.00015262274,0.000018772336,0.00010241555,0.00030616863,0.0010027775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973061,0.00047162845,0.00023520265,0.00006695276,0.0011312386,0.0007889381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017795643,0.0002805328,0.00033577674,0.0036871068,0.015888503,0.0040463437,0.0017412911,0.0008382685,0.009737208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067624864,0.0002307046,0.00038965844,0.006226403,0.0034270673,0.0018265139,0.0032971825,0.0015320866,0.00021093716],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041573308,0.00021373265,0.5088972,0.00018071053,0.000067993155,0.0009366149,0.21161917,0.0011500093,0.00073207804,0.13321152,0.03053026,0.11204502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012491376,0.000023982811,0.5912448,0.00020854619,0.000028180988,0.000085775726,0.3653021,0.0007326436,0.00014727373,0.0029615737,0.03920278,0.000049786373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99778616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10816802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10816802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14083807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7848176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152773232","doi":"10.20955/wp.2018.022","title":"Why did Rich Families Increase their Fertility? Inequality and Marketization of Child Care","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Russian Science Foundation; Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Marketization; Inequality; Fertility; Demographic economics; Gender inequality; Economics; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.025093895202680377,"score_gpt":0.2933320001638795,"score_spread":0.26823810496119915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152773232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8823559,0.0023900797,0.00071476446,0.060234137,0.00016326044,0.000020658304,0.0008392005,0.000014448997,0.053267475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99646384,0.0007482784,0.00012443554,0.0009525958,0.00009744858,0.000007351524,0.000054075976,0.000004494591,0.0015476007],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934703,0.00025785234,0.000015190504,0.000054092823,0.00009301718,0.00023269083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978243,0.0009868407,0.0005313442,0.00013551253,0.00021232314,0.00030965454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013928177,0.00005641018,0.00013770926,0.00045864328,0.0009485169,0.00078162004,0.00021607238,0.0004179613,0.007941705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071424437,0.00008565208,0.00015044154,0.00054449576,0.0014210282,0.0009904541,0.00079375564,0.00081893883,0.00024540082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029839744,0.00014113476,0.6729438,0.00016716844,0.00008900324,0.0006922769,0.011542243,0.00044160913,0.0013007618,0.16959232,0.021933429,0.120857924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041959054,0.00011342675,0.87712467,0.00025857636,0.00003674051,0.0005908539,0.019458968,0.00035130346,0.0011830514,0.048876144,0.05193728,0.000027033768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012384112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020752637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012384112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010764961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007107794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026567638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152870237","doi":"","title":"Can Economic Pressure Overcome Social Norms? The Case of Female Labor Force Participation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Generalitat de Catalunya; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Workforce; Demographic economics; Portuguese; Emigration; Shock (circulatory); Immigration; Labour economics; Economics; Political science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03871629382854407,"score_gpt":0.3576966186980011,"score_spread":0.31898032486945704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152870237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6350648,0.001211082,0.0014783972,0.07125116,0.00025978283,0.00006415311,0.000081399936,0.000008045639,0.29058126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944735,0.00022474154,0.00011709872,0.0011206565,0.0001243228,0.000035978504,0.000007362999,0.000006752448,0.0038895789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99214023,0.0045040734,0.00009432676,0.00039191358,0.0005140184,0.002355435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98976153,0.0067372033,0.0009405597,0.00054415857,0.00056463754,0.0014518632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009618809,0.00037079127,0.0006193937,0.0014532073,0.01010999,0.0071026636,0.0016433109,0.00645088,0.011891578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019452862,0.00029545923,0.0005922836,0.0014726971,0.016940948,0.005141686,0.0060453266,0.0036106573,0.00036645395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028053892,0.00036308437,0.03067719,0.0001320629,0.00005652967,0.0061831335,0.18721254,0.00042790116,0.0005792548,0.7326474,0.006650623,0.034789737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000273027,0.00028495438,0.053470857,0.0005784209,0.00009475594,0.0027222063,0.5247614,0.0021295066,0.0006271619,0.30563548,0.10931355,0.00010866194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018444477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019596143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018444477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030389025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036452506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050869703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156411587","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3387335","title":"Matching Function Equilibria: Existence, Uniqueness and Estimation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Uniqueness; Function (biology); Mathematics; Matching (statistics); Mathematical economics; Estimation; Applied mathematics; Econometrics; Economics; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Biology; Evolutionary biology","score_opus":0.010115640188206189,"score_gpt":0.2615999518887005,"score_spread":0.2514843117004943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156411587","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22385134,0.0017308955,0.7539926,0.004395938,0.000081545,0.0005314791,0.0007833073,0.00037211442,0.01426072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94198626,0.0017926587,0.043026377,0.00023377387,0.00016828436,0.00064526295,0.0005554705,0.000073044794,0.011518765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728346,0.0016081359,0.00010472411,0.0004275289,0.00021711469,0.00035906615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94580996,0.04681364,0.0035452633,0.0013961849,0.0016172798,0.0008176158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0103100035,0.0012119844,0.0046856483,0.0035342854,0.0015508927,0.004733924,0.0030802183,0.0044651423,0.014038142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07218872,0.0010951755,0.0023377,0.0034018818,0.0035516028,0.007169322,0.0034344445,0.0037320147,0.0015682344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079737505,0.0008233513,0.024159783,0.0006223036,0.00060588133,0.0004595897,0.0010394511,0.15777516,0.0013449925,0.73342395,0.008199232,0.07074897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020266851,0.00015427635,0.0027928513,0.00013157967,0.00015620257,0.0001530235,0.00061773136,0.43988413,0.0007318719,0.5530229,0.0020702914,0.0000825444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004618343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003017492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014038142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027515772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035134712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054525197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159133776","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v16i2.5412","title":"Creating Scandal: Prison Abolition and the Policy Agenda","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Political science; Public administration; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.022409406925905043,"score_gpt":0.3295969456839136,"score_spread":0.3071875387580086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159133776","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008300957,0.019828388,0.00037507253,0.9085452,0.004160602,0.00001670975,0.000021765189,0.00002597666,0.058725342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49889356,0.025596382,0.00082179025,0.38694844,0.0059707337,0.000146134,0.00007849474,0.00007432023,0.08147014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97914064,0.0104413275,0.0005546166,0.0006042803,0.0020281395,0.0072309505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98525536,0.006362129,0.0011646447,0.0003094694,0.0013454512,0.005563027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014866694,0.0005903195,0.00077333476,0.0019239913,0.018280666,0.022433247,0.0020529414,0.026738832,0.014440602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0188477,0.00050389697,0.0006860858,0.0015587407,0.026498107,0.015746817,0.010385192,0.015931401,0.0010655386],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059055612,0.00017192762,0.0012659357,0.0003747356,0.000014377281,0.0006262266,0.00964313,0.00027450998,0.00016975793,0.78516734,0.17343405,0.028798899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000369928,0.00013378453,0.004009986,0.0021996906,0.000014552596,0.0003197568,0.043108717,0.00046349064,0.00020586209,0.13509856,0.8143329,0.00007552896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030503696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03822087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030503696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01338344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03958129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09710413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160876634","doi":"10.47264/idea.lassij/4.1.8","title":"Are the Millennials Getting Less Married?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Demography; Demographic economics; Globalization; Educational attainment; Secularization; Causality (physics); Instrumental variable; Regression analysis; Economics; Geography; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Political science; Economic growth; Econometrics; Statistics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07072663312406183,"score_gpt":0.32851369302668143,"score_spread":0.25778705990261963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160876634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907753,0.0026106222,0.0002035313,0.0026839755,0.00009014169,0.0000075635185,0.00037194358,0.000003690966,0.0032533205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831355,0.00078951137,0.000045039797,0.00017997302,0.00003542406,0.0000033877923,0.00011090408,0.0000012458322,0.00052107475],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996642,0.00010562242,0.000022016025,0.000064604115,0.000045511504,0.00009797716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973724,0.0004970068,0.0014718587,0.00009372716,0.00010813351,0.00045698293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009362127,0.00013349802,0.00023473933,0.0006469567,0.00046168838,0.00080482906,0.00036629787,0.00040995146,0.0053087897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050567607,0.00010927899,0.00025887994,0.0008918428,0.00047516898,0.0008158867,0.0007109634,0.0007877403,0.0003353022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050970895,0.000039487146,0.9801129,0.00003908525,0.000050626208,0.00028453855,0.0016709757,0.000037735863,0.00004976661,0.0013428478,0.000812468,0.015508613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040037194,0.00007668471,0.98576003,0.000057972713,0.0000408198,0.00037331483,0.008677277,0.00013566083,0.0000653916,0.0011913934,0.0036107649,0.000006653869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041176085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047196993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053087897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027767493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034241076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017759621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162119417","doi":"10.5430/ijba.v12n3p108","title":"Spousal Secret Affairs with Money: Intra-household Allocative Efficiency in Spaces of Gender Politics in Development","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Business Administration","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Allocative efficiency; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Negotiation; Politics; Welfare; Public economics; Pareto principle; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Sociology; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.029171051070146663,"score_gpt":0.2890282062476983,"score_spread":0.25985715517755165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162119417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5533205,0.013111603,0.05760675,0.015204136,0.000093341354,0.00008673884,0.00012315842,0.000035546087,0.36041823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993869,0.0011256699,0.0020911526,0.00014854303,0.000015657155,0.000027171327,0.00001036123,0.000011513164,0.0027010036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937589,0.0045554317,0.00012045933,0.00043738273,0.00046229083,0.0006656191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359363,0.0041894866,0.0009241154,0.00056118413,0.00041891812,0.00031261359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078091132,0.0002698463,0.0004903149,0.0015617276,0.0031065072,0.009594755,0.0009539288,0.0012603403,0.005301329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0091197835,0.00029919358,0.00039229056,0.0024800107,0.018489439,0.008059662,0.0064210496,0.0011059401,0.00035648482],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077009645,0.000027403543,0.008389819,0.00013201065,0.000022922253,0.00020658417,0.03399431,0.0013385729,0.00036834145,0.9160032,0.0006910814,0.038748734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014734437,0.00007686353,0.024129191,0.00040218837,0.000040054645,0.00034622662,0.07116953,0.0034391433,0.0010260862,0.8334472,0.06586552,0.000043104526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029318559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004883774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009594755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064352783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026360068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046691418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162360684","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdad021","title":"Human Capital, Female Employment, and Electricity: Evidence from the Early 20th-Century United States","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Electrification; Electricity; Quarter (Canadian coin); Human capital; Empirical evidence; Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Rural electrification; Capital (architecture); Human capital theory; Mechanism (biology); Period (music); Economic growth; Engineering; Geography; Electrical engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.08893740157636551,"score_gpt":0.35574105701424436,"score_spread":0.2668036554378789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162360684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98084843,0.00901375,0.00010363004,0.0017691058,0.000029772957,0.0000039881425,0.0005247484,0.0000017433775,0.0077048074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99412906,0.004854384,0.000043909287,0.0001743538,0.00003695548,0.0000036950212,0.0002127694,0.00000104033,0.0005438612],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998325,0.000052818665,0.000009445584,0.000032191107,0.00003435305,0.00003870906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978269,0.00095929817,0.00074071717,0.00006980171,0.00024292519,0.0001604009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074713817,0.00013413871,0.00015191709,0.001116312,0.00058247795,0.0007660303,0.00023570527,0.00029387083,0.0042392313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023215075,0.00012551823,0.00014876272,0.0021737558,0.0007050151,0.0005159943,0.00076106866,0.0003971828,0.00019036232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082653234,0.00006747196,0.9456814,0.0001748051,0.00008859435,0.00040150553,0.0071383156,0.00017095797,0.00013466655,0.0034170744,0.0035246098,0.039117873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004140917,0.00002628426,0.98330116,0.00019133637,0.000025949048,0.00008697958,0.007449026,0.00008608364,0.00006870684,0.00041877522,0.008336724,0.000004883276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04364324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08900543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04364324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050308305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004008124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0867784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164039973","doi":"10.1086/715485","title":"World War II, the Baby Boom, and Employment: County-Level Evidence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Baby boom; Fertility; Boom; World War II; Total fertility rate; Demographic economics; First world war; Economics; Demography; Spanish Civil War; Labour economics; Political science; Population; History; Sociology; Law; Family planning; Research methodology; Engineering","score_opus":0.05174409984851565,"score_gpt":0.2915880436900077,"score_spread":0.23984394384149205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164039973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879447,0.008196549,0.00018004484,0.0007982423,0.000053738924,0.0000059005206,0.0008035188,0.000007313858,0.0020099853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99661607,0.0023852494,0.00010071853,0.000118587304,0.00005154188,0.0000058170267,0.00043523376,0.0000027451733,0.00028403563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913114,0.00040451455,0.000049865226,0.00015570756,0.000091459915,0.00016728001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99233925,0.0027829723,0.0028495786,0.00047011816,0.0005905286,0.0009674302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012615264,0.00019312109,0.00038873332,0.0011702201,0.00069865107,0.00089042605,0.00046012818,0.00048622597,0.003873847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050028064,0.00027136877,0.00077850395,0.0018826437,0.000543757,0.00035578542,0.0012120942,0.00070240896,0.00026221632],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006723773,0.00003612507,0.9953075,0.000051738094,0.0003342934,0.00007012365,0.00015826407,0.00007626208,0.00002743469,0.00014879335,0.00059106573,0.0031311703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008495409,0.00008124862,0.9974548,0.00007535827,0.00025844015,0.000063319174,0.00088177976,0.00009813464,0.000024758265,0.000072711984,0.000976674,0.000004176256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04373243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.082477935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04373243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003250293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006471598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086955786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164490206","doi":"","title":"Tax Relief for Breadwinners or Caregivers? The Designs of Earned and Child Tax Credits in Five Anglo-American Countries","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tax credit; Earned income tax credit; Work (physics); Poverty; Tax reform; Labour economics; Balance (ability); Public economics; Economics; Economic growth; Business; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.009839504555257686,"score_gpt":0.2565417490255277,"score_spread":0.24670224447027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164490206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935573,0.00044167208,0.000627951,0.0003484884,0.000019244786,0.00018864076,0.000073420335,0.0000062691042,0.004737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99594194,0.0002776374,0.0015651673,0.00013248756,0.0000031485772,0.00032966325,0.000054719756,0.0000034249817,0.0016916654],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994806,0.003897708,0.00015187882,0.00021847992,0.00026292782,0.0006629512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699557,0.00093196885,0.0005466232,0.0003549774,0.00040976767,0.0007611171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006991252,0.0002704583,0.00037995138,0.00070379337,0.0020385727,0.001945667,0.00068675826,0.00036821474,0.002310206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010516579,0.00037052593,0.00024263571,0.001058148,0.0028418421,0.0007714236,0.0024344353,0.00064528844,0.000121102734],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009218409,0.0018922949,0.48993826,0.00064087345,0.00020443986,0.00039666434,0.053940423,0.0073864004,0.0031427443,0.0809272,0.0047079497,0.34760442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029772606,0.009454394,0.75406927,0.0011311312,0.00042843242,0.00038940881,0.13602154,0.0035419306,0.004579789,0.015619872,0.07156569,0.00022131621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04043948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12403529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04043948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057951477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074543892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080408216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165709126","doi":"10.1111/labr.12195","title":"Public kindergarten, maternal labor supply, and earnings in the longer run: Too little too late?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Childbirth; Quarter (Canadian coin); Affect (linguistics); Spurious relationship; Demographic economics; Economics; Human capital; Labour economics; Psychology; Pregnancy; Economic growth; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.02109168346560943,"score_gpt":0.2543326908823639,"score_spread":0.23324100741675444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165709126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99615735,0.00069352234,0.0001644964,0.0015912392,0.000028423037,0.0000029460914,0.00031937094,0.0000038590224,0.0010388365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912673,0.00015520593,0.000046370915,0.00010530712,0.000015681835,0.0000026701189,0.00010529516,0.0000016089239,0.00044116963],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995466,0.00012975528,0.000019497022,0.00007953559,0.000043865915,0.00018068473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963491,0.0012925297,0.0013982272,0.00020457833,0.00017254188,0.0005829262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010401059,0.00015491279,0.00030107642,0.0003301074,0.00045902687,0.0010089143,0.0004322374,0.00052846933,0.005452612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038054502,0.00014385463,0.0004776391,0.00059340236,0.00068105524,0.00058793847,0.000977729,0.0009496839,0.00021446506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017671184,0.0000938641,0.9924074,0.000017614322,0.0001644268,0.000075116,0.00023527617,0.00035181374,0.00023854677,0.0012307015,0.0005567574,0.004451772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074268924,0.0000837603,0.99674463,0.000050659593,0.00011186667,0.0000136682775,0.0010676306,0.0003868225,0.00025299814,0.00061017193,0.0006651525,0.000005251189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04124178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06143117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04124178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008516057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009757041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082003415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167249882","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdaf064","title":"Estimating Welfare Effects in a Non-Parametric Choice Model: The Case of School Vouchers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Voucher; Welfare; Nonparametric statistics; School choice; Econometrics; Economics; Public economics","score_opus":0.03914850636367504,"score_gpt":0.367002511202089,"score_spread":0.3278540048384139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167249882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.504645,0.001460845,0.48606917,0.0018556087,0.000078199926,0.00036318824,0.00092910597,0.00015675815,0.0044420613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711292,0.00062772265,0.024596462,0.00013428202,0.0000444338,0.0002807063,0.00022899309,0.000020042366,0.0029381686],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866063,0.011108108,0.00023707526,0.0008713397,0.00044750504,0.00072962436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.896923,0.096327946,0.003684501,0.0019721186,0.0006354394,0.0004569288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020792289,0.0009038424,0.0034479583,0.0019393382,0.00058713375,0.0024792866,0.002543169,0.0028936383,0.005355363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05231694,0.0011700969,0.0032437844,0.0018669697,0.0024721997,0.0027209232,0.0023103324,0.0032666977,0.00032538496],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050404074,0.0006664851,0.017686458,0.00033649916,0.0007775921,0.00045966005,0.00032979014,0.8546637,0.00040836915,0.0996126,0.0007941047,0.023760622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009826153,0.0002611028,0.0050881053,0.000062840256,0.0001714439,0.00005416993,0.00023534834,0.9085559,0.00026546736,0.084123775,0.0010376186,0.000045915764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014939975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007854689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020792289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028747919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013893124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10996145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167691247","doi":"10.3390/jrfm14060265","title":"Examining Low-Income Single-Mother Families’ Experiences with Family Benefit Packages during and after the Great Recession in the United States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute for Research on Labor and Employment","keywords":"Recession; Welfare; Poverty; Subsidy; Income Support; Single mothers; Economics; Low income; Social security; Work (physics); Great recession; Economic mobility; Cash; Demographic economics; Business; Labour economics; Economic growth; Finance; Psychology; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.011674915281000297,"score_gpt":0.2302954196900889,"score_spread":0.21862050440908862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167691247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988844,0.000110737565,0.00003280687,0.0005389378,0.0000063051452,0.0000046961527,0.000035079815,0.0000012676185,0.0003858552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991026,0.0002266182,0.00007657374,0.00018489019,0.000004784243,0.0000135301525,0.000048775368,0.0000022514066,0.0003400058],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989305,0.0005020301,0.00006077325,0.00008372883,0.00013565474,0.00028736793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730265,0.0008149264,0.0009600285,0.000094810704,0.0002454767,0.00058205874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022430045,0.00016372083,0.00029009223,0.00053560594,0.0030285965,0.0014046825,0.00041578282,0.0006067499,0.0018784041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008744364,0.00025561862,0.00024610822,0.0005021995,0.0009861412,0.0014774463,0.002060198,0.0011711518,0.000103455975],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034754974,0.0003375501,0.6708737,0.00008327177,0.000100113655,0.0008116468,0.27020356,0.0002029237,0.00074810674,0.00085704454,0.0035051154,0.051929466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000907714,0.00017011307,0.5548913,0.00015439831,0.000033082502,0.00028972444,0.4384706,0.00023662669,0.00020496671,0.00019126928,0.005316234,0.00003262379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058506764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12055607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058506764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00193669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019996748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11633241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168494039","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3727133","title":"Asymmetric Demand Response When Prices Increase and Decrease: The Case of Child Healthcare","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Demand response; Business; Economics; Engineering; Economic growth","score_opus":0.01267674864856667,"score_gpt":0.2726001122171389,"score_spread":0.25992336356857226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168494039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.965519,0.00029955266,0.0028372533,0.00871551,0.0000764076,0.000038253293,0.00047762133,0.000028472987,0.02200794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861777,0.00007616001,0.00021052932,0.00013910349,0.000025346424,0.000005724876,0.000046878195,0.0000065584904,0.00087204744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872535,0.000521758,0.000029613113,0.000102086975,0.00008250692,0.00053864677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900011,0.0073869205,0.0009236588,0.00038433977,0.0004495292,0.0008544981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025522413,0.00027904328,0.0011039302,0.00053956575,0.0010368574,0.0028322157,0.00133837,0.0042638085,0.014239369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012222423,0.00042872413,0.0008635054,0.0008023278,0.0017838589,0.0025577643,0.0013378966,0.0030881178,0.0006913346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008583638,0.0030601055,0.23003015,0.0009985222,0.0007069588,0.026462628,0.012689115,0.1886893,0.012959428,0.43161184,0.04671003,0.03749843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013504183,0.0010470228,0.18330933,0.0001430731,0.00035481044,0.003362847,0.05435355,0.51870215,0.002150673,0.22295615,0.011820881,0.00044902656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02680423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016258009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02680423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021420117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011300832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053296447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170210969","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v13n6p165","title":"Gender, Employment, and Domestic and External Savings in Guatemala","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Balance of payments; Economics; Balance (ability); Balance of trade; Originality; Payment; Demographic economics; Labour economics; International economics; Political science; Psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.02429583652473305,"score_gpt":0.28805941232549576,"score_spread":0.2637635758007627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170210969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99563307,0.0006027757,0.000028263235,0.00091115554,0.000006352897,0.0000027318831,0.00010497952,0.0000024068488,0.0027080697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991855,0.00023211158,0.000017167988,0.000037417885,0.000003861613,0.000003210216,0.000025801293,0.0000010153102,0.0004939196],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996977,0.00010613558,0.000008035242,0.000020980111,0.000022662205,0.00014459237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995455,0.00012103279,0.00018672842,0.000012176362,0.00003010995,0.000104434155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003841899,0.00020305916,0.00023691586,0.000901912,0.0015335242,0.0012006093,0.00026261387,0.00038598778,0.0038248198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012373391,0.00010135961,0.00018282606,0.0017189796,0.0008849617,0.00058095733,0.0011532201,0.00038862292,0.00022362905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020020905,0.00010171426,0.9412435,0.000072868344,0.000058883306,0.0014197523,0.024427434,0.00037421653,0.00060691166,0.010608178,0.0015496392,0.01933665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004766051,0.00008161455,0.9642259,0.00007642332,0.000030416437,0.00032311518,0.027514143,0.00043836798,0.00011359914,0.001028784,0.0061513376,0.000011461994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08700256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16691266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08700256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001965707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007733989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17299235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170557416","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3642893","title":"Intertemporal Collective Household Models: Identification in Short Panels with Unobserved Heterogeneity in Resource Shares","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Economics; Econometrics; Resource (disambiguation); Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07128190648688891,"score_gpt":0.2788023400941296,"score_spread":0.20752043360724065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170557416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73966664,0.0011140095,0.24247669,0.0042434013,0.00015362568,0.00027593583,0.003773668,0.00027806847,0.008017951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96174806,0.0009171546,0.011688231,0.00025679625,0.00018879377,0.0003912241,0.0020260422,0.00005141649,0.02273234],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971751,0.001722162,0.00010368563,0.00049336324,0.00009509957,0.0004106055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96879,0.024981143,0.003760078,0.0012831094,0.00034700645,0.0008386636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008397181,0.0010922623,0.0034491052,0.0011463762,0.0012887426,0.0036078223,0.002925156,0.0037665481,0.012779578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017465658,0.001551494,0.001960368,0.002316727,0.0016956241,0.0037506178,0.002805835,0.0028637853,0.0014949981],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089561637,0.000751003,0.058061462,0.0002667943,0.0010946188,0.00087160536,0.0021341965,0.7544354,0.00049688795,0.14911516,0.0068477676,0.025029542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012914266,0.00013750982,0.006656771,0.00005030991,0.00013448476,0.00005767994,0.0006448168,0.91945004,0.00011001834,0.07133473,0.0012469251,0.00004753373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022382705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026436398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022382705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014613305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011498382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04450482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176194940","doi":"10.3138/jcfs-52-2-005","title":"Couples’ Relative Education and the Division of Domestic Work in France, Spain, and the United States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Earnings; Normative; Unpaid work; Negotiation; Inequality; Demographic economics; Sociology; Socioeconomic status; Economics; Work (physics); Gender studies; Political science; Population; Demography; Social science","score_opus":0.041820360423837695,"score_gpt":0.35674832431087966,"score_spread":0.314927963887042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176194940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99700147,0.0006479978,0.00003574308,0.00021920007,0.0000062535705,0.0000011667524,0.000018987914,8.134486e-7,0.0020684043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995515,0.0001409518,0.000011905081,0.000023249075,0.0000023944601,8.5148287e-7,0.000014175164,3.85059e-7,0.00025462534],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993849,0.00032137212,0.000020117734,0.000046444202,0.00005712086,0.00017007177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991911,0.00027231502,0.00024916427,0.000026922471,0.00010531782,0.00015516381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015069003,0.00009819486,0.00019887873,0.0010476755,0.0013939436,0.0018542318,0.00023318232,0.00037596707,0.0024147332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017735966,0.00007434317,0.00018418982,0.0010192799,0.0009777029,0.00046408738,0.0010840121,0.00032092887,0.000118255084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002857515,0.00022161716,0.8985178,0.000036693164,0.00008854854,0.00046282387,0.05140426,0.0005304167,0.00034078473,0.007701625,0.0011845506,0.039225142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018272229,0.000073267576,0.9154572,0.00006496709,0.000020484506,0.00015355661,0.077822275,0.00026478083,0.00009517604,0.0007919746,0.0052253576,0.0000126287105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056399688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06638228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056399688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021132806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006218357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11214286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177171914","doi":"10.5040/9781474207188.ch-002","title":"Family and Household: A Century of Bedrooms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.02589451149943614,"score_gpt":0.26841945421005226,"score_spread":0.24252494271061611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177171914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20282026,0.09243293,0.0015427821,0.089585654,0.003149736,0.000026694213,0.00054666307,0.00007109495,0.6098242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9040077,0.022108387,0.00030632984,0.0036350298,0.0006532042,0.000027266879,0.00007639998,0.000056974164,0.06912885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992711,0.00044100158,0.000014545636,0.00005970203,0.00006795252,0.000145817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996184,0.00011437553,0.0000401319,0.000040132207,0.000040203035,0.00014668977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068446057,0.0002773865,0.000182279,0.0007306179,0.007842202,0.0032889287,0.0005119748,0.0006382162,0.0144263925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013959948,0.00019937541,0.00010071381,0.0009950608,0.010707149,0.004564495,0.0035588595,0.0017095902,0.0009299531],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108939785,0.000040665764,0.0036935222,0.00011867962,0.000010346086,0.0006160974,0.2871678,0.00016137595,0.00024435087,0.520533,0.0957277,0.0915775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003919518,0.000015340982,0.005436553,0.00033828014,0.0000025030952,0.0001361635,0.10541748,0.00003256003,0.0000875261,0.01367141,0.8748473,0.000010997949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042506915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0892391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042506915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036765658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014889225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08451897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185583478","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3896797","title":"Welfare versus Work Under a Negative Income Tax: Evidence from the Gary, Seattle, Denver and Manitoba Income Maintenance Experiments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Economics; Work (physics); Labour economics; Income tax; Demographic economics; Public economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.025878286805349954,"score_gpt":0.2878671748623964,"score_spread":0.26198888805704645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185583478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99427646,0.00017097194,0.000060776336,0.00050935545,0.0000115103085,0.000033265227,0.00012927639,0.00000512367,0.004803338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929202,0.00031516977,0.00014377874,0.00047916995,0.000012156283,0.0001010316,0.0002977546,0.000009060108,0.00572162],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968771,0.002197898,0.00006530748,0.0002073003,0.00026339132,0.00038904554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693224,0.019576926,0.0048249476,0.0026904223,0.0012091531,0.0023761832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007376233,0.0004887934,0.0008725513,0.0009049049,0.0037777582,0.0020106186,0.0021613715,0.001622519,0.0098561365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014667989,0.00038025863,0.00041097918,0.0012689976,0.00500705,0.0012441024,0.001546178,0.002261919,0.00082230684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10472509,0.047452908,0.6797261,0.00052334473,0.002001136,0.0012894948,0.03131734,0.0029938864,0.008808187,0.031202966,0.024604117,0.065355465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052661006,0.007598195,0.9279098,0.00022124496,0.0010502593,0.0001338899,0.03618403,0.0016149768,0.002561116,0.00461186,0.012753788,0.00009487627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24690577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4974993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7530942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004163177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038596308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49093723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188951520","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3822013","title":"Partisan Fertility and Presidential Elections","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Political science; Fertility; Politics; Law; Demography; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.012312743682857591,"score_gpt":0.27829097506893125,"score_spread":0.2659782313860737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3188951520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97728866,0.00068286824,0.00019262066,0.0021065471,0.000051823274,0.000006547562,0.0002468736,0.0000067976043,0.019417197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99713385,0.00012070566,0.000012672732,0.000050477556,0.000045401976,0.0000022794661,0.00004641606,0.0000027013987,0.0025854544],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991054,0.0003760629,0.00002150245,0.000060381655,0.000058004596,0.0003786045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98982424,0.0055256095,0.002028281,0.00031963977,0.00039753306,0.0019047315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002139337,0.00007103809,0.00028618044,0.0006324219,0.001347023,0.0015582525,0.000260279,0.00058074336,0.017998558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011627464,0.00014410629,0.00020118631,0.0007915485,0.00074839627,0.0006301993,0.0006276955,0.00075004157,0.0010904262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013024076,0.00045712182,0.9306287,0.000058480906,0.00011565126,0.00034913584,0.005500703,0.0012450496,0.00042194568,0.027235238,0.0062658666,0.026419673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034804983,0.00016298593,0.9775964,0.000027732336,0.000039689672,0.00013403494,0.0071142334,0.0009844863,0.0001807922,0.006669066,0.007040348,0.000015461417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0087169325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02311159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017998558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068394345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007637721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060211122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189773310","doi":"","title":"Intertemporal Collective Household Models: Identification in Short Panels with Unobserved Heterogeneity in Resource Shares","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Bristol","keywords":"Econometrics; Economics; Monotonic function; Nonparametric statistics; Variable (mathematics); Identification (biology); Econometric model; Distribution (mathematics); Function (biology); Panel data; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15766412658896534,"score_gpt":0.34437751158940383,"score_spread":0.1867133850004385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189773310","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27863622,0.000579526,0.7071475,0.001690313,0.000055902365,0.00012415723,0.0033178446,0.0002472623,0.008201257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9399066,0.0005506351,0.04190204,0.00024053504,0.000081800245,0.00039139768,0.0022991183,0.000065893335,0.014561979],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.998706,0.0007447237,0.00004416162,0.00027871825,0.00008042501,0.00014595206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99455667,0.003109304,0.0012196884,0.00078473456,0.00016077717,0.00016889344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030790707,0.0005789864,0.0011308064,0.00058867584,0.0004704108,0.0015548555,0.0017202466,0.0014746443,0.008037494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008696047,0.0006329317,0.0012075049,0.0015154068,0.0007050346,0.0016666695,0.001554293,0.0015027055,0.0009412949],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001681622,0.00015910986,0.034678437,0.000117642914,0.0004336437,0.00045392427,0.00072392245,0.79218,0.0007713721,0.13808875,0.0038777615,0.028347211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028245135,0.00003395223,0.0056488444,0.000028476006,0.000041396324,0.000051238676,0.00016572715,0.92411095,0.00012413278,0.06738077,0.002362156,0.000024125682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015859228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014541809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015859228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008857888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005944029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031533837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191406191","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3773746","title":"Class, Social Mobility, and Voting: Evidence from Historical Voting Records","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Class (philosophy); Political science; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Politics","score_opus":0.03017237468016513,"score_gpt":0.29197673554403764,"score_spread":0.2618043608638725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191406191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99440295,0.0006159375,0.00020134861,0.00017329068,0.000017594417,0.000010324362,0.0015316523,0.000003640872,0.0030433147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971739,0.0003261006,0.00007532663,0.00002362643,0.000024909878,0.000010738543,0.0014314476,0.0000041818585,0.0009295528],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985695,0.0006551014,0.00014324866,0.00022530442,0.00018257492,0.00022424376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97337997,0.011300809,0.010603297,0.0021907678,0.0014010869,0.0011240798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032458294,0.00018935507,0.00046903215,0.0024974332,0.0013966264,0.0014901544,0.00092689646,0.00070637936,0.008729868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01593327,0.00030441064,0.00029850693,0.0058515943,0.0010424977,0.0014842665,0.0009409927,0.0008505961,0.0015518235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027007348,0.000090700065,0.9876501,0.00004484741,0.00014595155,0.000058579077,0.0020189285,0.00012736095,0.00007987934,0.0005884714,0.0010683784,0.007856755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012550102,0.000070382885,0.9937977,0.000047823418,0.00006877994,0.000068242545,0.0025701185,0.0003344111,0.00011603433,0.00033573565,0.002567157,0.000011027114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017150871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03672698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017150871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033832178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002600706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034102082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191571247","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3679710","title":"The EITC and Maternal Time Use: More Time Working and Less Time with Kids?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Time-out; Psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.01162785578512645,"score_gpt":0.23171527972365913,"score_spread":0.22008742393853267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191571247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916996,0.0011674025,0.00004620679,0.003083235,0.000053753774,0.0000052254472,0.00020135022,0.000002085934,0.0037411677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984774,0.00040818407,0.000044895663,0.00019389074,0.000032884578,0.000008232207,0.00006934253,0.00000371863,0.00076147454],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913955,0.00030283417,0.0000527725,0.000100640544,0.00010833667,0.00029580295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99380434,0.0020688563,0.0022428841,0.00021453644,0.00027187352,0.0013974932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013525737,0.00025471288,0.00044472236,0.000936298,0.0008746956,0.0019604939,0.00079309475,0.0017812669,0.01043034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076292744,0.00041002198,0.0006315768,0.0016062052,0.0013217574,0.0013706426,0.001286415,0.0016593602,0.00040035354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019336556,0.00016428149,0.9857743,0.000032304735,0.00007214347,0.00024867256,0.0048215375,0.00003077461,0.00015745444,0.0012817704,0.00035656046,0.0068668714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011996351,0.00007223364,0.9796,0.00008038818,0.000073073614,0.00019485105,0.018526383,0.000097209886,0.00009477653,0.0003989054,0.000839176,0.000010948603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03233409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0343696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03233409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009630458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017110736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064291775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193407002","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v13i1.70275","title":"Economic Policy Trends: The Domestic Violence Crisis and COVID-19: Can Short Term Rentals Help?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Renting; Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Term (time); Isolation (microbiology); Business; Political science; Medicine; Virology; Disease; Law; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.05131441258637442,"score_gpt":0.3650142979262459,"score_spread":0.3136998853398715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193407002","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056501243,0.015143721,0.00012721772,0.8850107,0.0013858583,0.000016294118,0.0019529053,0.000030021216,0.039831895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7534429,0.07000305,0.0005535534,0.1220873,0.002178913,0.000043551972,0.0024561828,0.000085754466,0.049148813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990067,0.00012180486,0.000024268127,0.000045495537,0.00029148828,0.0005102516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99616677,0.0004647309,0.00035092593,0.000044588476,0.0010917532,0.0018811114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013171943,0.00018695324,0.00024246899,0.00079871924,0.0045738425,0.0050789746,0.00090674026,0.0030121845,0.018290833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004767417,0.00016073883,0.00021836799,0.0018919223,0.0023439473,0.00250074,0.0016829562,0.0054259347,0.001036222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014189734,0.00020646294,0.060091976,0.00057492324,0.000042924974,0.00049780286,0.0063731433,0.00040528324,0.00033812193,0.10465697,0.69702166,0.12964885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036593396,0.000058751324,0.2025218,0.0013953425,0.00003428716,0.0001646418,0.033709485,0.00062776287,0.00024353813,0.009378829,0.7517643,0.00006470768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8081648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88425344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8081648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025226297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05180355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38592994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198094718","doi":"","title":"Pathways to Higher Education for Native Hawaiian Individual Development Account Participants","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Native Hawaiians; Graduation (instrument); Indigenous; Receipt; Unemployment; Asset (computer security); Welfare; Psychological intervention; Demographic economics; Gerontology; Psychology; Sociology; Demography; Economic growth; Economics; Medicine; Population; Accounting; Ecology","score_opus":0.09119342042541945,"score_gpt":0.3319038858377854,"score_spread":0.24071046541236596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198094718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741277,0.00022747765,0.00023069815,0.0061464706,0.00004826624,0.000115995346,0.00041243515,0.000018679504,0.01867231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838711,0.0002775367,0.00062350696,0.0005802102,0.000017207232,0.00010648595,0.0002573005,0.000005857582,0.014260741],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993894,0.0001417052,0.0000118027165,0.000033528446,0.00004492656,0.00037859552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822026,0.00013863538,0.00017820213,0.000035914712,0.00011793739,0.0013089604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007299567,0.00013914787,0.000120169585,0.0006435727,0.0034287944,0.0019250509,0.00048179433,0.00058337214,0.01648952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029837354,0.00014552374,0.0002169003,0.00064740906,0.0003715191,0.00095768354,0.003093038,0.0011553372,0.0009920927],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026570875,0.0020129017,0.7489716,0.00013807588,0.000027735396,0.0016436599,0.05135538,0.00035090247,0.00092603324,0.0114648715,0.018861143,0.16398208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007806677,0.00041546783,0.7263119,0.00036910916,0.000021830743,0.00044519344,0.18973269,0.0011370869,0.0006503589,0.0068895435,0.073882505,0.00006626155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06564554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19103332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06564554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021684326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056148106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1305269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199080841","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Full-Day Kindergarten on Maternal Labour Supply","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Absenteeism; Margin (machine learning); Demographic economics; Immigration; Day care; Labour economics; Economics; Psychology; Demography; Business; Medicine; Geography; Nursing; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.018669216799039184,"score_gpt":0.32475386192463745,"score_spread":0.3060846451255983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199080841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971999,0.00021249625,0.000023127164,0.00018052994,0.0000035217747,0.0000061851224,0.00059398165,0.0000030947135,0.0017771744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975726,0.00019105911,0.000052453393,0.00003474153,0.0000030355536,0.000005590078,0.00029425553,0.0000016457527,0.0018445397],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994311,0.000089217014,0.000016765583,0.000059974634,0.00014799635,0.00025497496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771786,0.0006201135,0.0006523693,0.00009633264,0.000322647,0.00059069286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050121825,0.0001854233,0.0002730013,0.00035849767,0.000718613,0.00094368355,0.0006401617,0.00031832472,0.0043915147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028412573,0.00014922785,0.000306117,0.0007001457,0.00059634924,0.00023219439,0.0007010802,0.00036048246,0.00026389418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059981574,0.00015548663,0.97428924,0.00005671029,0.000076741526,0.0002802659,0.0014675488,0.001053101,0.001511129,0.00034063382,0.000700107,0.019469196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006853489,0.00007357052,0.997891,0.00001327012,0.0000149702255,0.000011277865,0.0011429959,0.00010760219,0.00011195112,0.000020766543,0.000602679,0.0000031543957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90513045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9666267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90513045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011991867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008390314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19085646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203141890","doi":"10.3390/jrfm14100469","title":"Gender Differences in Intra-Household Financial Decision-Making: An Application of Coarsened Exact Matching","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining power; Economics; Human capital; Earnings; Matching (statistics); Per capita; Distribution (mathematics); Per capita income; Empowerment; Household income; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Finance; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Statistics","score_opus":0.019316894611859616,"score_gpt":0.26892619461113,"score_spread":0.24960929999927037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203141890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64624655,0.0003663006,0.34439257,0.00033493605,0.000092986644,0.0007316464,0.00068180816,0.00018400876,0.0069692056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9150689,0.00011046112,0.082835466,0.00009318238,0.000022518418,0.00035384155,0.0003208758,0.000025821975,0.001168902],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99062485,0.0064155366,0.0003689253,0.001287997,0.0008979441,0.00040470494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96025914,0.028511282,0.0031348648,0.0064307856,0.0011921265,0.00047180417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016060751,0.0005165361,0.0011670681,0.0018125061,0.0009436255,0.0017366938,0.0013782352,0.00067384203,0.0078021307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06815874,0.00041529676,0.0010690108,0.0027117196,0.0015850752,0.0024920034,0.0031708176,0.0012659952,0.00033556967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002664954,0.0009103274,0.38270888,0.0004521045,0.0014523584,0.00072485907,0.015815435,0.101150475,0.0022981009,0.13953559,0.002232162,0.3500548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016491312,0.0007845649,0.1908624,0.00014876566,0.0001894106,0.00028777958,0.0048626484,0.48640034,0.0015283049,0.30936146,0.0052700858,0.00013934664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008724216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055945283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016060751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012152334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011842737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08493841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203413034","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/vg8h5","title":"World War II, the Baby Boom and Employment: County Level Evidence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Baby boom; Fertility; Boom; World War II; Demography; Demographic economics; Total fertility rate; First world war; Geography; Economics; Political science; Population; History; Sociology; Family planning; Engineering; Law; Research methodology","score_opus":0.08655467701541925,"score_gpt":0.3518289166940763,"score_spread":0.26527423967865704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203413034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888676,0.0064863353,0.00018525322,0.0009945937,0.000056584613,0.0000053678714,0.0008188552,0.000007029806,0.0025784504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99679995,0.0020903724,0.00009465849,0.00014311243,0.0000534896,0.0000050061826,0.00042755602,0.0000030596461,0.00038273877],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992894,0.00031586262,0.00003328711,0.00012181621,0.00008108559,0.00015856858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99400324,0.0019626445,0.002377413,0.0003547047,0.00048106696,0.0008208781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009666032,0.00016311657,0.00033411133,0.0009986241,0.00065667817,0.0008405425,0.0003853947,0.00039837728,0.0036940216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038721396,0.00020819988,0.0005548994,0.0018295636,0.0005524947,0.00033603178,0.001120869,0.00055398414,0.00027063652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006245883,0.000028884731,0.99413,0.00005153097,0.000213605,0.000085314125,0.00023699294,0.000104052146,0.00003700676,0.00023906845,0.00091758906,0.0038934357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006926753,0.000066010216,0.99709177,0.00006253424,0.00014574995,0.000054326858,0.0011287704,0.00008579267,0.000029244238,0.000080947095,0.001244234,0.0000036393117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050637837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098373145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050637837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035139907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006729599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10068619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204559142","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v22i4.2911","title":"Happy 45th Anniversary to the Earned Income Tax Credit. Thoughts on One of the Most Expensive Costing Credits in the U.S. Tax Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Tax credit; Presidential system; Legislature; Work (physics); Income tax; Economics; Legislative history; Tax law; Law; Tax reform; Accounting; Labour economics; Business; Public economics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.028902008143003248,"score_gpt":0.23633084726542447,"score_spread":0.20742883912242122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204559142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026997428,0.010223492,0.00084466767,0.27231452,0.036667578,0.00007397438,0.002481356,0.0002064947,0.6501904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10197818,0.0035158568,0.00046740175,0.05290334,0.0052010277,0.00010784248,0.0008133096,0.000095630574,0.8349174],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994918,0.000048686532,0.00001496758,0.00008149394,0.00017334911,0.00018963112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960774,0.000041277093,0.00004170375,0.000024319392,0.00013614733,0.00014877995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008597969,0.00028442004,0.00017156288,0.00038069588,0.0044260575,0.002972502,0.00040953074,0.0034844342,0.034955245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021661464,0.0001883097,0.00021195426,0.00034115955,0.00100832,0.0025454464,0.0016911172,0.0050298884,0.009659249],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002759718,0.00003337871,0.0014545502,0.000016575648,0.0000018717197,0.00012468355,0.00061203085,0.00003005366,0.0001955369,0.08410084,0.89023066,0.023172295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022119912,0.000013384208,0.0034165748,0.000029095647,8.6287827e-7,0.000034577843,0.00036063427,0.000014413352,0.000063220075,0.0017359313,0.9943242,0.0000050526905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027838131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.070455454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034955245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020805507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017600264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11693692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205272812","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2020-137","title":"How Did the Canada Child Benefit Affect Household Spending?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Renting; Recreation; Demographic economics; Consumer spending; Health spending; Agricultural economics; Household income; Economics; Affect (linguistics); Low income; Business; Labour economics; Socioeconomics; Health care; Economic growth; Geography; Psychology; Health insurance; Political science","score_opus":0.024299443593667217,"score_gpt":0.24143621429760725,"score_spread":0.21713677070394005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205272812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83793575,0.005342708,0.0007094854,0.050176423,0.00020751866,0.00012651508,0.02477845,0.000054049822,0.08066918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98514634,0.0015314996,0.0002747382,0.0015767397,0.0000351634,0.00003596207,0.0028067802,0.000020489517,0.008572365],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979532,0.0002353034,0.000034158187,0.00014881627,0.0005222576,0.0011062826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739504,0.00028060348,0.00041158334,0.00006859357,0.0011463037,0.0006978118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011271928,0.00027086394,0.00045535472,0.0010281276,0.0022926552,0.0021749858,0.0009485906,0.0007167253,0.007832227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005170909,0.00018483725,0.00062725594,0.0028425665,0.0010111969,0.0007440105,0.0011442199,0.0013157242,0.00036315323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002593377,0.00010978443,0.9175354,0.0001301536,0.00023031596,0.00021073976,0.0027268787,0.0024954707,0.00034585633,0.016849747,0.030504905,0.028601315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001764656,0.00003365357,0.95866287,0.00010796022,0.00006976262,0.00003078011,0.00391977,0.00090364256,0.0002098898,0.00075385027,0.035263088,0.000027142814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99426264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06516377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06516377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04779241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47279847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208456935","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3623323","title":"Spousal Insurance, Outside Options and Wage Bargaining","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Business; Labour economics; Economics; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.016749006315500366,"score_gpt":0.2655410261845197,"score_spread":0.24879201986901933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208456935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90488034,0.0031262937,0.0006947031,0.005903056,0.00006967037,0.000013398838,0.00012727967,0.00000521114,0.08518008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99578744,0.00041850386,0.00002801262,0.0000996687,0.000029455801,0.0000033242452,0.00001744889,0.0000011668999,0.0036149872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994686,0.00019580439,0.000013464698,0.000034603643,0.00005204902,0.00023542195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757904,0.0015079442,0.0003833491,0.000054882094,0.000053180105,0.0004216418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013217335,0.00017243094,0.00027948123,0.0006744691,0.0018732749,0.0025336503,0.00040681366,0.0015812584,0.02933013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003949055,0.000120489596,0.00015855652,0.00083218096,0.0020288,0.0015528913,0.0009674974,0.0012062725,0.0005890078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018625809,0.0023568932,0.3244199,0.0001588316,0.00008832927,0.0018269377,0.02192315,0.0028909042,0.00074050133,0.5392802,0.006962323,0.097489476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026727497,0.00063381775,0.38798073,0.00051917613,0.0001144974,0.0011644858,0.11492001,0.0054803495,0.00044412087,0.4462186,0.042186774,0.000070096205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004107268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007926658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02933013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087046815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010234294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09811908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209762429","doi":"","title":"A Critique of Gender Ideology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Landas Journal of Loyola School of Theology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Identity (music); Gender identity; Gender studies; Register (sociolinguistics); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.021814755113325982,"score_gpt":0.32531612292647766,"score_spread":0.3035013678131517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209762429","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013425278,0.021413606,0.0065202997,0.5251374,0.005468929,0.000024821515,0.00013662814,0.00005971016,0.42781335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7674183,0.0113772275,0.003350323,0.14201386,0.012334322,0.0001656743,0.00008231554,0.00027200437,0.06298596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98685384,0.0072770673,0.00031019535,0.0018426947,0.0024203202,0.0012958129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905483,0.0062894085,0.0005691205,0.000619444,0.0013137984,0.00065990863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012681387,0.000772554,0.00080486666,0.0025411134,0.0127288895,0.008841599,0.0024196878,0.009509318,0.0076057753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012755944,0.0003296803,0.0006990623,0.0019499209,0.085437976,0.014234751,0.006189487,0.016249722,0.001637468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008806707,0.000005460507,0.000174842,0.000025744277,0.0000022636573,0.00003494766,0.010361546,0.00002100878,0.000018289718,0.97081584,0.015245776,0.003285419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001828562,0.000017502924,0.0006145669,0.00039042404,0.0000067787964,0.00023230558,0.013780134,0.00014922701,0.00013317712,0.49338704,0.49125051,0.000020125253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019405754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014112699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019405754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011531248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067818877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08366543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210443208","doi":"10.1920/wp.ifs.2020.620","title":"OLS estimation of the intra-household distribution of expenditure","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Engel curve; Econometrics; Estimation; Economics; Poverty; Resource distribution; Distribution (mathematics); Resource (disambiguation); Representation (politics); Identification (biology); Resource allocation; Mathematics; Economic growth; Computer science","score_opus":0.04521116512262465,"score_gpt":0.30638793238523054,"score_spread":0.2611767672626059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210443208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88747746,0.00035615504,0.07738279,0.00052468205,0.000028372242,0.00012475325,0.017630301,0.00035462817,0.016120877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639025,0.00037359796,0.014945757,0.00007170713,0.000013088639,0.00012515276,0.011881851,0.00003944542,0.00864688],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944025,0.00029337182,0.000029839972,0.00007363718,0.00008767027,0.00007520988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868864,0.0006820912,0.00025642436,0.00021253136,0.00013252521,0.000027757183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009588206,0.0003119882,0.0005169757,0.001050595,0.00021286766,0.000810424,0.0004159995,0.00029475163,0.0042093014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038656767,0.00024952402,0.0005395812,0.00198445,0.0002578886,0.0003855156,0.0006111478,0.0006323638,0.0011421448],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020951779,0.00017315587,0.7652477,0.00021618573,0.0006991685,0.00035935265,0.00094717316,0.08616576,0.0012997955,0.031433214,0.020214692,0.09303436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040720202,0.00017187506,0.72533566,0.0001307998,0.00021929592,0.0003556857,0.0034555064,0.21305692,0.0036143651,0.025496742,0.028054329,0.00006807713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023961361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01772801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023961361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029338655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004896286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04764378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210498949","doi":"","title":"GENDER RELATIONS: GENDER DIFFERENCES, DIVISIONS AND INEQUALITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TRAILS: Teaching Resources and Innovations Library for Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Gender studies; Gender inequality; Gender relations; Sociology; Social inequality; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0564361796884422,"score_gpt":0.31289169533576516,"score_spread":0.25645551564732294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210498949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079664715,0.18953994,0.0017338129,0.23995572,0.007952773,0.000088231456,0.00082857534,0.000067297944,0.480169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70965976,0.10995253,0.0010697646,0.016017346,0.008832147,0.0002938418,0.00029934,0.000079915204,0.1537953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926835,0.00042455774,0.000019591074,0.000055690787,0.000107610635,0.00012426738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874604,0.00084849284,0.000100843536,0.000032894455,0.000098838456,0.00017284369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016976915,0.00032491935,0.00044418115,0.00064752105,0.0023861807,0.0049101007,0.0004312114,0.0013971379,0.031016491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038165657,0.00019815414,0.00016157815,0.0019251637,0.0047930195,0.0046491483,0.001481209,0.0018127036,0.0016622641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009642757,0.00019848255,0.013411617,0.00041887627,0.000021109463,0.00042370774,0.051513743,0.00022278109,0.00042257478,0.5195953,0.28476894,0.12890638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036572135,0.00009693346,0.04223364,0.0013855598,0.000021708254,0.00043373922,0.092929654,0.00022301234,0.00012398367,0.26860183,0.5938895,0.000023973682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011660335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01682557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031016491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001336861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016798642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10376054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210773372","doi":"","title":"FEMINIST PERSPECTIVES ON GENDER AND SEXUALITY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TRAILS: Teaching Resources and Innovations Library for Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Heterosexuality; Gender studies; Homosexuality; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.036328456248736055,"score_gpt":0.31891856107193645,"score_spread":0.2825901048232004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210773372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011578179,0.13438228,0.005192685,0.17011821,0.0018559009,0.000016322454,0.00016502177,0.000019208153,0.6766722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73729575,0.09400629,0.003866612,0.03069524,0.004164473,0.00013603906,0.000118395066,0.000044496366,0.12967274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844676,0.0010756312,0.000024503737,0.00009484978,0.00020092746,0.00015730134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858713,0.001027055,0.0001136028,0.00004290157,0.000115651674,0.00011368299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001969251,0.00042635822,0.00028251903,0.0014228128,0.0028246536,0.002875879,0.00053732144,0.0016213693,0.00766541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002135836,0.00013512696,0.0002112447,0.0011895961,0.019180551,0.003091737,0.001541316,0.0025446801,0.0005676278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005731223,0.000007807624,0.00025637902,0.000047733534,0.0000019624574,0.000061130544,0.010598842,0.00008364515,0.0000629218,0.97146577,0.008984725,0.008423369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051035313,0.0000141997625,0.0009672566,0.00047166023,0.0000028702077,0.00020265878,0.011357408,0.000090628135,0.0000757641,0.42129868,0.56550705,0.000006712612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044541988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063428483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00766541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027924029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013366109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02564329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211805927","doi":"10.4324/9781003128151-17","title":"The Economics of Being LGBT. A Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.061210702289780455,"score_gpt":0.3657848725117263,"score_spread":0.3045741702219459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211805927","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000093635856,0.99745053,0.000023271117,0.00096831354,0.00029358774,0.0000055096125,0.00005786679,0.0000019115726,0.0011053511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00056492747,0.9985359,0.000030720345,0.00034881796,0.00020255196,0.000007727378,0.000028648252,0.0000010936856,0.00027956272],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992888,0.000253176,0.00011539635,0.0000785081,0.00020387392,0.000060229966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997874,0.001503246,0.00027099217,0.000031953605,0.00022957457,0.0000902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010645832,0.0008164063,0.0013864666,0.003554471,0.0004644082,0.0021732925,0.0008464468,0.0020308266,0.014113659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004510546,0.0004019402,0.0012423439,0.0041051484,0.00083307276,0.0015915296,0.0010087005,0.0018799495,0.0021546767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012996838,0.00007711469,0.0012940059,0.08286262,0.00032173007,0.00030563129,0.0003613097,0.0002879442,0.00010238079,0.008646709,0.1078207,0.7977898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027388209,0.00010340334,0.0056886645,0.13471383,0.00046456527,0.0018110126,0.000587343,0.000057478082,0.000056129684,0.003951261,0.85250807,0.00003088147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070894435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008001462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014113659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019155901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004244726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047214925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213305492","doi":"10.1080/21620555.2021.1998771","title":"Property in whose name? Intrahousehold bargaining over homeownership in China","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Sociological Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Demographic economics; Socioeconomic status; Wife; Autonomy; Distribution (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Inequality; Housing tenure; Economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Geography; Political science; Demography","score_opus":0.06022535508619389,"score_gpt":0.3388988201303736,"score_spread":0.2786734650441797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213305492","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106475316,0.8814671,0.00021973852,0.002580867,0.00029106127,0.000016573427,0.00012484161,0.00000475824,0.008819689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33622935,0.66102624,0.00014031514,0.00038360595,0.00033185378,0.000014942432,0.00013315301,0.0000022299632,0.0017383354],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999663,0.00009449646,0.000037972455,0.00005167131,0.00009102059,0.00006174764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997876,0.000073857416,0.000055865625,0.0000059249874,0.00004443025,0.000032215645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009881048,0.00029940388,0.00041259237,0.0024353433,0.0006733143,0.00093299954,0.0004764323,0.00039167402,0.0015244742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009300631,0.00012371338,0.00033096707,0.0031603856,0.0008998802,0.0011337121,0.00052313355,0.0002952604,0.0000662379],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014569829,0.000082667335,0.12374968,0.011046131,0.00028881265,0.001271309,0.012598703,0.00080059515,0.0007812047,0.03360101,0.01668679,0.79894733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000329243,0.0002315901,0.6874486,0.008199694,0.00053095643,0.0019652913,0.018456826,0.0014169348,0.0006259018,0.0084135905,0.272578,0.000099705445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053175543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07821267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053175543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001656623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030207713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10573202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214062051","doi":"10.3968/12265","title":"The Influence of Globalization on the Female Gender: The Igbo Example","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Igbo; Globalization; Ethnic group; Meaning (existential); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Subject (documents); Development economics; Psychology; Law; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03969794135056374,"score_gpt":0.33174575881547425,"score_spread":0.2920478174649105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214062051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2555618,0.007360465,0.0021134394,0.038028333,0.0008361585,0.00003846505,0.000052144507,0.000015555965,0.6959936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542787,0.003835072,0.0005216481,0.0038998164,0.00034531712,0.000038920753,0.0000147418,0.00003490724,0.037030805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897003,0.00059365446,0.000008298428,0.000054156124,0.00006613614,0.0003077551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994273,0.00033189327,0.00006595606,0.000025391177,0.000059090667,0.00009038687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013347835,0.0005177487,0.00032130972,0.00084126485,0.009164092,0.0032054877,0.0004121065,0.00161484,0.0062584537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013595873,0.00013410878,0.0002936443,0.0009053283,0.00978546,0.002815246,0.0032797721,0.0018143168,0.0005351326],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019649373,0.00011250118,0.013429911,0.0002001725,0.000010468651,0.0032254946,0.31743807,0.00009220839,0.0009137637,0.6040172,0.017784772,0.04257903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026234731,0.000073764924,0.01695502,0.0009077533,0.000020224545,0.00127345,0.35820997,0.00022456805,0.00047501223,0.035272412,0.58653647,0.000025203864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015278515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024384134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015278515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027442873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012130592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030379176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215788054","doi":"10.1093/ej/ueab085","title":"Intrahousehold Resource Allocation and Individual Poverty: Assessing Collective Model Predictions using Direct Evidence on Sharing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Economic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Economics; Poverty; Welfare; Per capita; Inequality; Identification (biology); Econometrics; Clothing; Resource allocation; Engel curve; Public economics; Microeconomics; Aggregate expenditure; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.11771307408687368,"score_gpt":0.31826280587490297,"score_spread":0.2005497317880293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215788054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882833,0.000103722996,0.007217344,0.0004668045,0.0000065157733,0.000023789471,0.0005225206,0.000015037725,0.0033610887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849355,0.00004029806,0.00084115856,0.000023349408,0.0000049940713,0.000023555556,0.00027172136,0.0000042478214,0.00029705497],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982875,0.0011744249,0.000057832447,0.00022158641,0.000105529085,0.00015308874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97084963,0.022926157,0.0024599645,0.0025464108,0.0007439996,0.00047381644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009574114,0.00038496268,0.0006818641,0.0012281821,0.00045279603,0.0013192672,0.0008662315,0.00084771554,0.008328544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027927233,0.00021114624,0.0007138998,0.00134006,0.0013097398,0.0014578424,0.001922533,0.00081668043,0.0005860902],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006654034,0.00032201843,0.5875952,0.00014216907,0.0006764107,0.00030181382,0.0015654766,0.3319217,0.00032936636,0.050088875,0.0029940612,0.023397475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011156653,0.0005183125,0.21902318,0.00017926193,0.000179298,0.00015701055,0.00345677,0.6656456,0.0005457977,0.107305616,0.0028175367,0.000060041617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00803773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004751329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009574114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009869745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004493497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05063337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216741184","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v13n12p90","title":"Nafta and Mexico’s Economic Growth from a Gender Perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Economics and Finance","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deindustrialization; Economics; Population; Cointegration; Tariff; Demographic economics; Development economics; Labour economics; International economics; Economy; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.01872160967196118,"score_gpt":0.2651752210872994,"score_spread":0.24645361141533823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216741184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8573901,0.010455059,0.00025339602,0.029244281,0.00013754361,0.000008784203,0.00066939724,0.000009719258,0.10183164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988106,0.0036599513,0.00009990289,0.00039235674,0.0001016784,0.000008728035,0.000108080545,0.000002609653,0.0075206086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982905,0.000033844794,0.000002602456,0.000017491962,0.000024947685,0.00009210311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997607,0.000055625576,0.00009087847,0.000006741735,0.000033067663,0.00005299292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037317415,0.00011421307,0.00012874401,0.00082974415,0.0013209463,0.001510576,0.00019743845,0.00039519544,0.00603939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005654325,0.00004786999,0.00015802674,0.00094003114,0.00072504306,0.00095565,0.00079673907,0.00041908465,0.00014203705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003558989,0.00015684923,0.49582815,0.00016815402,0.000069212416,0.0015542223,0.026887465,0.0006368158,0.001337672,0.31414688,0.02210847,0.13675034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009433003,0.00009236663,0.78394747,0.00021496706,0.00002958895,0.00031613105,0.032149773,0.00040379926,0.0003239992,0.0090767145,0.17341715,0.000018682173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041172512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0710421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041172512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023303218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009864842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08186573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W322042547","doi":"","title":"Factors that Influence on Child Care Expenses of Single Mother Families in the U. S.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Child care; Single mothers; Marital status; Quarter (Canadian coin); Single parent; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Earnings; Family income; Child support; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Payment; Demography; Medicine; Family medicine; Demographic economics; Business; Developmental psychology; Finance; Economics; Population; Political science; Environmental health; Accounting","score_opus":0.02553722272260278,"score_gpt":0.23609677809238502,"score_spread":0.21055955536978224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W322042547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993998,0.00008404528,0.000007896517,0.000060773513,0.0000017273329,0.0000012555893,0.00021847783,4.8381105e-7,0.00022559759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995271,0.0001063226,0.0000223008,0.000013887812,0.0000024331475,0.0000027098406,0.00022358734,5.000392e-7,0.00010111499],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997489,0.00006784537,0.000027334734,0.00003236683,0.000048468086,0.000075068696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870133,0.00021531392,0.00073922216,0.00003356472,0.000096177784,0.00021437899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002718691,0.00016328167,0.00016882266,0.0007309462,0.0004956588,0.00036084262,0.00013922193,0.0001831733,0.0015907336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017221826,0.00012476348,0.00025076204,0.0008238923,0.00016471892,0.00026556075,0.00039178474,0.00026797215,0.000102553604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019378984,0.000019451994,0.99736077,0.0000044571916,0.000014546447,0.00008981764,0.00025734917,0.000034271914,0.000050884548,0.000020165277,0.0001406866,0.001988275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.267673e-7,0.000009520232,0.99915504,0.0000048477027,0.0000030304918,0.00006286213,0.0006045432,0.00003113088,0.000012827683,0.000007847973,0.0001067892,0.0000010106414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034232326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08250462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034232326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048275306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004629922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06806612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32645261","doi":"10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00325","title":"A Strategy for a Successful Christian Sexual Education Ministry in the African American Church","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bioconjugate Chemistry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Christian ministry; Christianity; Political science; Theology; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0421260103522243,"score_gpt":0.30931930893333076,"score_spread":0.26719329858110646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W32645261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34264794,0.0078042685,0.01603009,0.1543887,0.009656627,0.00061762606,0.00027397505,0.00034706978,0.46823364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7132073,0.0027617398,0.016748203,0.014432188,0.0004419441,0.00018491213,0.00009485077,0.000085738684,0.25204313],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996536,0.00013848324,0.0000055825353,0.000022214677,0.00003471275,0.00014543095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996425,0.000019423836,0.000024502542,0.000022403356,0.00004193081,0.0002492309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075273897,0.0002962829,0.000092983,0.0002678789,0.00702022,0.0009773299,0.00036784634,0.0008864115,0.022222528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000694329,0.00008591893,0.00015462293,0.0002076945,0.001140343,0.00089869555,0.0025326347,0.0018046458,0.0029385514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025280935,0.000791571,0.0113620125,0.00039183872,0.000022545299,0.003482564,0.03550851,0.00020609122,0.01348726,0.2788941,0.18878473,0.46681595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016678096,0.00010828108,0.0049157147,0.00025515127,0.000010072631,0.0006416638,0.023047954,0.00011520482,0.0021191572,0.0066394377,0.9621136,0.000017064474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031491076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01009987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022222528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012218353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003478953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074341714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W329625139","doi":"","title":"Earning and Caring. (Book Reviews/Comptes Rendus)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Ideology; Presentation (obstetrics); Construct (python library); Vitality; Social science; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.04053547399843921,"score_gpt":0.28335664841247005,"score_spread":0.24282117441403084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W329625139","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025336354,0.8848915,0.0003354272,0.0053737806,0.007626597,0.000029002476,0.00020672935,0.00011190908,0.10117165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004901126,0.6457037,0.0009948092,0.0060027298,0.005429667,0.000096794225,0.0005201391,0.00015746652,0.3361936],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993949,0.0000826969,0.00005254094,0.00009980802,0.00030369515,0.000066431974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992556,0.00024263145,0.000067937595,0.000049572136,0.00025371654,0.0001305454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050089153,0.0018850536,0.001034586,0.0031699075,0.001302452,0.0032540748,0.001041001,0.0017054577,0.07328037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016397756,0.0006019074,0.0005428329,0.0040010344,0.0012133509,0.0035316632,0.0019206994,0.0023915423,0.044948794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016218606,0.00002551231,0.00006812359,0.0009388132,0.000005018232,0.00008079352,0.00038905206,0.000048871763,0.00007575104,0.0037131633,0.77814215,0.21649656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024875667,0.000009150727,0.00043251348,0.0008522225,0.0000027235717,0.00022609887,0.00021677522,0.000012247888,0.000022010443,0.0013675044,0.9968501,0.0000061779197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011112933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024765834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07328037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020571551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026402273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24514723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W342871414","doi":"","title":"Connecticut's Jobs First Program: An Analysis of Welfare Leavers.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Welfare; Earnings; Quarter (Canadian coin); Survey of Income and Program Participation; Sample (material); Welfare reform; Cash; Food Stamp Program; Demographic economics; Interim; Economics; Labour economics; Business; Political science; Finance; Food stamps; Accounting; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.01932317178825188,"score_gpt":0.2954098280214344,"score_spread":0.2760866562331825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W342871414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99184716,0.00035952666,0.00022334186,0.00040760246,0.000021559465,0.00028379503,0.004680696,0.000008097176,0.002168247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811755,0.000588722,0.00061628,0.0004669772,0.000043750584,0.0008776614,0.008868269,0.000018531771,0.007344288],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868697,0.00030557893,0.000047508584,0.00017531311,0.00036347308,0.00042122378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746907,0.00043283778,0.00096394855,0.0001203285,0.00026667264,0.00074709207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016899849,0.00044224926,0.00034406784,0.0021205896,0.0020299628,0.001044279,0.0011614857,0.0008541836,0.004636121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030454986,0.0005585784,0.00045805806,0.0032560998,0.00046151518,0.00059448276,0.0015873444,0.0015848012,0.00060948066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000219393,0.00035052598,0.98743725,0.000046959136,0.00004615885,0.00035326378,0.0011869326,0.00022964753,0.00013555924,0.00036204024,0.003084639,0.0065476666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027198097,0.00022687885,0.9924942,0.000073213196,0.000029962108,0.00014374667,0.0031109243,0.0007824503,0.000087578264,0.000046886566,0.0029656845,0.0000112185835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30637407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47983402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30637407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037763908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005309318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6091815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W344186390","doi":"","title":"Power Relations and Contraceptive Use: Gender Differentials in Bangladesh RAPPORT DE FORCE ET UTILISATION DE CONTRACEPTIF: DIFFÉRENCES DE SEXE AU BANGLADESH","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender relations; Power (physics); Family planning; Fertility; Demography; Sociology; Gender studies; Demographic economics; Population; Research methodology; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.02965488847700056,"score_gpt":0.28476445684895707,"score_spread":0.25510956837195653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W344186390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99541414,0.0007068997,0.000052576732,0.00026077172,0.000004029927,0.0000051893994,0.00016541092,8.420194e-7,0.0033901185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99909914,0.00032423544,0.000023950377,0.000016086287,0.000002300325,0.0000037841226,0.0000326625,7.007377e-7,0.0004972981],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995258,0.00017114509,0.00003706719,0.000058456917,0.000106834734,0.00010074034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882346,0.00048011966,0.00034740122,0.000043552747,0.00013875356,0.00016668111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000671006,0.00014538364,0.00022065264,0.001049809,0.0008338193,0.0007201291,0.00019459779,0.00028987302,0.005443316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030370264,0.00014424734,0.00013533457,0.0018627741,0.0011163731,0.0006825032,0.0006521664,0.00032989128,0.00038701523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001423667,0.00005575873,0.9466609,0.00005515444,0.000028466118,0.00027864534,0.033324674,0.000051082494,0.0011407518,0.0014810694,0.00030639357,0.016474793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035910796,0.00006484779,0.97876465,0.000028599134,0.0000068540717,0.00020005563,0.01904778,0.00005116432,0.00010319383,0.00028630093,0.0014342165,0.00000873168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06176071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08879183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06176071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012081917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006133126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122802496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36274532","doi":"","title":"Child Care and Economic Development: Markets, Households and Public Policy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of economic development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic growth; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Public policy; Work (physics); Economics; Business; Public economics","score_opus":0.018054835926975436,"score_gpt":0.27397123207475216,"score_spread":0.2559163961477767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36274532","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07918488,0.07371182,0.001328684,0.557606,0.0009172563,0.00007120137,0.0004975734,0.000033709348,0.28664878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9171056,0.048407473,0.00045238523,0.015024357,0.0009769396,0.00008076964,0.00013256894,0.000018681181,0.017801216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982243,0.0007806946,0.000029958834,0.00007376795,0.00026044864,0.00063076714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962745,0.0023484365,0.0003681762,0.00006306993,0.00029189562,0.0006539215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028047855,0.00025238493,0.00039639283,0.0016951899,0.003971168,0.010453305,0.0009418542,0.0031970749,0.02239054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005167991,0.00024070025,0.00025884958,0.0034213886,0.009288417,0.00833842,0.003919317,0.0030481971,0.00037671006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026304957,0.00008661687,0.005376869,0.0001518568,0.000010467331,0.00022136098,0.0024575687,0.0011675004,0.000034473465,0.9121073,0.04960273,0.028756905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044159486,0.00008550708,0.0297041,0.0031055121,0.00001793326,0.00020117282,0.043181796,0.0027379964,0.0001949951,0.46887013,0.4517895,0.00006719097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09016676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08419573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09016676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016427461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011853377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17928386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36473107","doi":"10.2196/38894","title":"Non-marital fertility among Mexican American women: exploring the role of social context","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"JMIR Formative Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences","keywords":"Fertility; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Gender studies; Demography; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Political science; Geography; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.04329048250198373,"score_gpt":0.383958589494404,"score_spread":0.3406681069924202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36473107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971154,0.00030546632,0.000060238115,0.00069641694,0.000009693498,0.00003945403,0.000055332668,0.0000011988249,0.0017168197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998926,0.00042153258,0.00013705985,0.0001130049,0.000007800261,0.000057300764,0.000026188034,6.4529274e-7,0.00031040257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990213,0.0006452008,0.000034609107,0.000047745772,0.000092596434,0.00015841874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976393,0.0014614481,0.00038164243,0.00008185767,0.00023391288,0.00020179212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038529197,0.00013958177,0.00029432678,0.0007110582,0.0021239512,0.001055106,0.0005028119,0.000449245,0.0018086348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008971529,0.00019469263,0.00028630355,0.00057407963,0.0006085377,0.0011638463,0.0011407492,0.00063157384,0.000065280925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013884611,0.00047458315,0.7988577,0.00020887046,0.000040425526,0.00064413314,0.14892197,0.000039895804,0.0002671629,0.0006716843,0.0007294347,0.04900525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012662149,0.00027013733,0.6492652,0.00014444055,0.000044325883,0.00022627802,0.3466582,0.0001729809,0.00011487221,0.00034142646,0.002736295,0.000013225084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03507367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09738812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03507367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010067568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022264451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06973904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W38952810","doi":"10.7202/013037ar","title":"Conférence François-Albert-Angers 2004","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Compensation (psychology); Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.029769472868035204,"score_gpt":0.25432572691853667,"score_spread":0.22455625405050145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W38952810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008378893,0.079424985,0.0051435945,0.05685848,0.039452806,0.00012902859,0.002150372,0.0006138586,0.8078479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018222833,0.013065138,0.0013474594,0.0016156911,0.002285821,0.0000588183,0.00094685564,0.00017869749,0.9622786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867994,0.00031645942,0.00007815468,0.0003335151,0.0003909717,0.00020106774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881136,0.00031630162,0.00007266325,0.0001289989,0.0004656042,0.00020514787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018726562,0.0011071707,0.0008792715,0.0014878403,0.0031810151,0.006406179,0.0012342705,0.003011188,0.28499037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028253119,0.00037259597,0.0007514381,0.001313635,0.0013077111,0.0032837258,0.002142655,0.0022804097,0.09002668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032911132,0.00011740523,0.0012394665,0.00038388462,0.000035671397,0.0004042955,0.00071202917,0.00054749846,0.0010328325,0.06447145,0.7747916,0.1559347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062562126,0.000009353833,0.000622098,0.00012967657,0.000003285653,0.00008127608,0.00018407516,0.00008105022,0.00014178206,0.0011474638,0.9975883,0.0000054376383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017957529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02707775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28499037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003946428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031126905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95338774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W395603784","doi":"","title":"You do have choices : a practical guide to financial decisions for women of all ages","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.026757018777994978,"score_gpt":0.288455827258513,"score_spread":0.261698808480518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W395603784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005290983,0.026405022,0.029953782,0.084599696,0.01662572,0.003735444,0.012779604,0.012602441,0.8080072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0054913433,0.0148764625,0.032093715,0.031141318,0.001744686,0.0022286526,0.0043463893,0.0015547534,0.90652263],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993691,0.0002378596,0.0000571575,0.00007543438,0.00018416264,0.0000762333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819034,0.00084806926,0.000104430605,0.00006891319,0.0004466978,0.0003414746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010518308,0.0015153959,0.0010049102,0.0010274422,0.0017998804,0.0029212686,0.0011208764,0.0023900568,0.20411912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004048708,0.0008777497,0.0004529624,0.0010211695,0.0005179627,0.0048728622,0.002166364,0.004338339,0.15826921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011077657,0.00005439432,0.00008852577,0.000071533745,8.9519654e-7,0.00008632131,0.00043587518,0.000032846314,0.00010939148,0.0009316299,0.951814,0.04636351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007883104,0.000025840855,0.00033567272,0.00016763608,6.1966875e-7,0.00015793146,0.0006007299,0.0000458025,0.000033546534,0.0014429794,0.9971726,0.0000086004065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002671767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008683457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20411912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072402635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022137929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6828464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W406976","doi":"10.1139/m77-125","title":"Welfare Policy: A Critical Site of Struggle for Women's Safety","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.016220973588973002,"score_gpt":0.28822667910338307,"score_spread":0.27200570551441006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W406976","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030813461,0.005150616,0.0006474456,0.92003703,0.0012758309,0.000051571653,0.00007361298,0.000033872835,0.041916527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8371818,0.011313136,0.0010884432,0.116362594,0.0009042571,0.00013196553,0.00005287264,0.00008525423,0.03287971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893022,0.003592189,0.00014532787,0.00034981905,0.0014731197,0.0051373383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887389,0.0037387183,0.0006099537,0.00026590345,0.0025704342,0.0040760706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012920224,0.0003780972,0.0005927518,0.0017161873,0.03579303,0.015803723,0.0023286794,0.0089516295,0.011200733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016849961,0.0004519969,0.00032771454,0.0021614877,0.029757822,0.006013888,0.008346949,0.008758402,0.00046937563],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006744574,0.00006515512,0.006830088,0.00029304755,0.000020619598,0.0015748652,0.12684202,0.00019168208,0.00067019137,0.61488533,0.17840397,0.07015561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001870596,0.00006924121,0.007855075,0.0009955612,0.0000140892635,0.00025468494,0.3147685,0.000086767795,0.00032758285,0.053244602,0.6223072,0.00005797067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5277954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63938504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47220463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051880967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1547736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9499711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200177648","doi":"10.1111/japp.12569","title":"Why a <scp>UBI</scp> Will Never Be High Enough","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Economics; Workforce; Payment; Distribution (mathematics); Labour economics; Welfare; Perception; Consumption (sociology); Income distribution; Basic income; Economic inequality; Public economics; Demographic economics; Welfare economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Psychology; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.021939110970899595,"score_gpt":0.25444538529629745,"score_spread":0.23250627432539786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200177648","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11185485,0.0022852614,0.005267876,0.6854906,0.0036954654,0.000051325493,0.00009884212,0.00015071308,0.19110496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90334994,0.0008408554,0.0017509797,0.06606585,0.0005742834,0.00003730855,0.000023511815,0.00011180868,0.027245393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995876,0.0017098165,0.000115809315,0.00036982435,0.0011784375,0.00075011415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921382,0.002214982,0.00069890596,0.0007247698,0.0028419553,0.0013811534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006670618,0.00012556816,0.0002115063,0.00029960804,0.0042908886,0.0038078844,0.00072143046,0.0041769985,0.011307131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015965069,0.00015842308,0.00026825283,0.00032232585,0.0110957585,0.003261781,0.0016504626,0.004572297,0.0024250746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116427196,0.0001193949,0.018834507,0.00023830523,0.000044390737,0.00066943915,0.017320728,0.00026896846,0.002456868,0.5316658,0.3332377,0.09502754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029037323,0.0001685364,0.023917273,0.0005905826,0.00002815336,0.00081408577,0.03648877,0.00087717536,0.0023908883,0.23538555,0.6992143,0.000095659874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009231809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009420106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011307131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002867618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029095903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03782606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200558597","doi":"10.3386/w29548","title":"Productivity and Pay in the US and Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Economics; Agricultural economics; Business; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.22701845029417136,"score_gpt":0.4724011172628986,"score_spread":0.2453826669687272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200558597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94930923,0.0028247635,0.00017720314,0.00461245,0.00006267403,0.000022866023,0.0057277805,0.000028533888,0.037234545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99226755,0.0009389354,0.0001002154,0.0001979704,0.000011233589,0.0000064297974,0.0014086321,0.0000062265194,0.00506282],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879515,0.00005786086,0.000024888162,0.0000700906,0.00042642528,0.00062563014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968497,0.000329675,0.00037768166,0.00005370271,0.0013576754,0.0010315375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006991979,0.00019360172,0.0003351545,0.003374187,0.0028868099,0.001978275,0.00068904983,0.0004213923,0.0036356845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003866172,0.000119338154,0.00042543584,0.0063749743,0.0010141042,0.0005363191,0.0010871963,0.00091607624,0.00021071242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001903551,0.00010424146,0.9107325,0.000075705466,0.0001179135,0.00030263278,0.0037819054,0.0022254959,0.00013377442,0.026307564,0.016217284,0.039810512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017184968,0.000018837185,0.977742,0.00008342143,0.00003538945,0.000074669246,0.005957473,0.001353684,0.00010527962,0.0012467302,0.0133356415,0.000029664176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99789315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046872362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046872362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044033237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34008437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205106578","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/6rv34","title":"Population Externalities and Optimal Social Policy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; University of Texas at Austin","keywords":"Externality; Fertility; Subsidy; Economics; Population; Altruism (biology); Public economics; Total fertility rate; Welfare; Microeconomics; Government (linguistics); Imperfect; Family planning; Demography; Market economy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04019206546756882,"score_gpt":0.343390339509447,"score_spread":0.30319827404187816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205106578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7132649,0.00087324827,0.121895246,0.014624636,0.00014692073,0.00015105662,0.0010089119,0.00020267774,0.14783241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900294,0.00037138755,0.0032765572,0.00034836848,0.000033826982,0.00005914734,0.000067842906,0.000023065684,0.005790501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991743,0.00040929622,0.000018615021,0.00009236691,0.00007025832,0.00023509844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985146,0.00089372206,0.00028111355,0.00007830824,0.000099002325,0.000133218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013928548,0.00042311125,0.00065614487,0.00062649685,0.00062331045,0.0015396189,0.0004036718,0.0011920467,0.006397232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056137936,0.00033210492,0.0004956751,0.00043398238,0.0017396582,0.0015870936,0.0010681394,0.0010860214,0.00025090913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009898606,0.00010410538,0.005180001,0.00007545818,0.0000905619,0.0001436039,0.00013935543,0.35319254,0.0007313026,0.626141,0.0029551103,0.011147994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081657294,0.00006972233,0.0050926977,0.00006126327,0.00003555469,0.00007188151,0.00033766538,0.17787503,0.0003785429,0.80981374,0.006160978,0.000021269829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059831087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054354845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006397232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003936867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019839667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028564155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205280974","doi":"10.1038/s41598-021-04352-y","title":"Alleviating time poverty among the working poor: a pre-registered longitudinal field experiment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles; University of California, Los Angeles; Harvard Business School; Harvard University","keywords":"Poverty; Voucher; Population; Scarcity; Psychology; Demographic economics; Medicine; Economics; Economic growth; Environmental health","score_opus":0.03456766984592626,"score_gpt":0.2890157432995345,"score_spread":0.25444807345360826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205280974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97897387,0.000060014405,0.0011131403,0.00036202604,0.000115409166,0.01604088,0.0007877648,0.00007516051,0.0024717655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78030795,0.0004673329,0.028062895,0.0029489666,0.00033836294,0.16896532,0.0018095647,0.0000751805,0.017024305],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969297,0.0015601912,0.00016376162,0.00038647745,0.00034581756,0.00061403384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871379,0.0051198993,0.0016117624,0.0025003408,0.001587572,0.0020425285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013482005,0.0016179526,0.0014988384,0.0007052315,0.0064075873,0.0014689246,0.0030799475,0.0024758088,0.012804615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008032857,0.0015513403,0.0009743608,0.0005982281,0.0028003105,0.0014210377,0.0017997375,0.0054249726,0.0024902783],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0773055,0.7828544,0.016305255,0.0013063147,0.00025690597,0.00062038103,0.01699452,0.0012520866,0.034510907,0.0030012676,0.009877871,0.055714604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.051379904,0.8147777,0.081542104,0.0003833163,0.00056906487,0.0002105137,0.009726422,0.0017146686,0.013220563,0.0046496093,0.021575836,0.0002503851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004381835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00925818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013482005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012678927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052007954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07130051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206127244","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3988202","title":"Zero-hours Contracts in a Frictional Labor Market","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Workload; Zero (linguistics); Appeal; Work (physics); Business; Welfare; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Operations management; Economics; Computer science; Market economy; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.008527053645576018,"score_gpt":0.2589055658359579,"score_spread":0.2503785121903819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206127244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9365982,0.00050864264,0.014056744,0.004841649,0.000078332,0.000065836335,0.00030795502,0.000063901745,0.043478683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994323,0.000113154274,0.00032242495,0.00007324883,0.000032986627,0.000013051512,0.000025660142,0.000007263872,0.005089251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987249,0.00040212154,0.00005352966,0.00017522214,0.00010155809,0.0005425701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98935914,0.005711033,0.0022130979,0.00057943974,0.0002798094,0.0018576195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033272014,0.00028784527,0.0017141396,0.0007665218,0.0032983753,0.005045007,0.0014949826,0.0037654405,0.028422642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011141439,0.0006434786,0.0004504725,0.0011427875,0.0054234546,0.004895988,0.002369901,0.0024133527,0.001230714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068013876,0.00056783867,0.01283906,0.000099826684,0.000031530166,0.0019244051,0.002311539,0.015173894,0.00043858652,0.95424235,0.003731227,0.007959678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006365175,0.00029164637,0.011592005,0.00007812669,0.00003622576,0.0005095135,0.007862514,0.046568688,0.00011353911,0.92834765,0.0038928927,0.00007067319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007899769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007917664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028422642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016774023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026388064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09508324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206231659","doi":"10.4000/books.irdeditions.9679","title":"Bibliographie","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IRD Éditions eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03867319872012148,"score_gpt":0.2649385496385785,"score_spread":0.226265350918457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206231659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013197738,0.08044922,0.0017934387,0.0064731888,0.010962058,0.0006203972,0.3247174,0.0018324004,0.57183206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014961891,0.12922634,0.0044081914,0.0029449791,0.00357462,0.0018992677,0.3128129,0.0022327595,0.5279391],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702054,0.00033814754,0.0005342188,0.00042611177,0.0014156017,0.0002653166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942569,0.0012515996,0.0004508666,0.00043881047,0.0034112502,0.0001905834],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013627548,0.0016862432,0.0025057634,0.03464237,0.0025023273,0.0077695777,0.0018791854,0.0015029937,0.5909946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012003414,0.0007573005,0.0008983596,0.055331897,0.0011559707,0.0037613628,0.0026399912,0.0024372693,0.28172246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004929776,0.00002285464,0.00020926874,0.0037491457,0.000018634673,0.000092574184,0.0003160203,0.00010658293,0.00017166091,0.0054910593,0.91681904,0.072953895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041365306,0.0000037344187,0.00043270673,0.0010888921,0.0000057322463,0.000042315638,0.00009027697,0.000010654939,0.000032332184,0.0003581783,0.99792576,0.000005262207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053893395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041929938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4090054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00798733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007970749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58339655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207040888","doi":"10.54932/hvdc9170","title":"Zero-hours Contracts in a Frictional Labor Market","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; European University Institute","keywords":"Workload; Zero (linguistics); Welfare; Work (physics); Business; Labour economics; Face (sociological concept); Microeconomics; Economics; Market economy; Engineering; Management","score_opus":0.031648219277612306,"score_gpt":0.3123715175603619,"score_spread":0.2807232982827496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4207040888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61490285,0.00095900556,0.17284961,0.010855381,0.00036418685,0.0006123846,0.0027001705,0.00041506172,0.19634134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608081,0.00027392726,0.0053488445,0.00026196594,0.000058781985,0.00017605918,0.00017484509,0.000030548956,0.032866888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856,0.00056686543,0.000045249453,0.00024424025,0.00015460052,0.00042904067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970247,0.0012007427,0.0007060176,0.00021923507,0.00021328781,0.0006359102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023996718,0.00076557713,0.0014482609,0.00091439846,0.0014159819,0.003595633,0.0026100182,0.003852806,0.02133475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005565595,0.0006863016,0.0009191648,0.00096781406,0.0030644261,0.0031094828,0.0019741086,0.0018125717,0.0017277612],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037877285,0.0004088773,0.003942365,0.00010565166,0.000047786714,0.00068996963,0.0005912724,0.24513076,0.0005187889,0.7364908,0.005602479,0.0060924287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077614456,0.00039393085,0.003320739,0.00008548487,0.000048431513,0.00023550271,0.001089691,0.63348085,0.00010070265,0.34941378,0.010946923,0.00010786727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016250195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01235129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02133475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029228649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026976243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071371794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210436637","doi":"10.1111/caje.12554","title":"Gender identity and relative income within households: Evidence from Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Demographic economics; Survey data collection; Census; Norm (philosophy); Economics; World Values Survey; Geography; Distribution (mathematics); Demography; Sociology; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.1538858962389791,"score_gpt":0.22275998468225758,"score_spread":0.06887408844327847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210436637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719376,0.0024026325,0.00028576746,0.0015681414,0.000032262695,0.000037059202,0.00794958,0.000011633072,0.015775349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99467695,0.0013162907,0.00015882646,0.00019453478,0.000006973185,0.000010805845,0.002034411,0.000008107061,0.0015930072],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979728,0.00021796978,0.00007636966,0.0002763968,0.0007571932,0.0006992942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892753,0.0011805948,0.0017987916,0.000449235,0.0059700906,0.0013259562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013622275,0.00022048483,0.00058196683,0.0028011962,0.0059484295,0.0024139704,0.0016529385,0.0004484278,0.0049394686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077439644,0.00029530827,0.0004405103,0.011653769,0.0020652195,0.00076419185,0.0018488351,0.0010620691,0.00032038044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012864823,0.000059567315,0.96243715,0.0001004487,0.00012293941,0.00019819071,0.011205361,0.0002554511,0.00008558801,0.003352116,0.007148917,0.014905578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008407715,0.0000135740165,0.9801856,0.00014869185,0.000040589966,0.000051634313,0.012807373,0.0002959788,0.00010160774,0.00025188865,0.006072381,0.000022215267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99713373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024174448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024174448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026889473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17539877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210975464","doi":"10.1007/s10603-021-09501-4","title":"The Impact of Tax Refund Delays on the Experience of Hardship Among Lower-Income Households","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Annie E. Casey Foundation","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Internal revenue; Payment; Debt; Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Revenue; Labour economics; Income tax; Service (business); Tax credit; Economics; Finance; Public economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.03487271767497859,"score_gpt":0.33551996529483585,"score_spread":0.3006472476198573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210975464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965114,0.00012058246,0.000009414577,0.0011384211,0.00001486066,0.0000048859188,0.00009044413,7.057493e-7,0.002109241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99942327,0.000083283114,0.000006938237,0.00006762621,0.000008169972,0.0000035613696,0.000035361347,6.326618e-7,0.00037116007],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984694,0.000504738,0.00005444261,0.00005524303,0.00008398225,0.00083215174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99311227,0.0017148552,0.002057734,0.0001551211,0.0006502881,0.002309744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011521374,0.00015264792,0.0003210387,0.00072008657,0.0031833656,0.0020624078,0.00057585136,0.0010834741,0.008884941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008242308,0.00024125003,0.00044262418,0.0009937297,0.001090977,0.0014344116,0.002479493,0.0021838653,0.00030673927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001062767,0.0015027934,0.93991184,0.000057280737,0.000096225885,0.0009365746,0.031538468,0.00042089383,0.00024996942,0.0025208187,0.0024704982,0.019231858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021907752,0.00025855465,0.8780645,0.00006660686,0.000030211486,0.00015570542,0.11780853,0.0002256752,0.0000695359,0.0005167122,0.0027554897,0.000026502035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077212706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12545681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077212706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026874766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021437113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15352654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211255941","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/534e4","title":"Top incomes and the gender divide","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Demographic economics; Distribution (mathematics); Economics; Income distribution; Labour economics; Income tax; Sample (material); Wage; Inequality; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0318898676420695,"score_gpt":0.2977557928924393,"score_spread":0.2658659252503698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211255941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82365245,0.010972243,0.001989359,0.011326711,0.00034382596,0.00002568896,0.0014245638,0.000019096751,0.15024596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99179476,0.001882915,0.00025798113,0.0006341879,0.00012152706,0.000014950885,0.00018124878,0.0000069183334,0.0051054205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988752,0.00028762047,0.00003304345,0.00015990013,0.00028448002,0.00035974436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788135,0.0007812138,0.0006504732,0.00009596126,0.00025184485,0.0003391382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012424493,0.0001863389,0.00031581154,0.0017074293,0.0016314074,0.0023797962,0.0003838741,0.00041034343,0.014686139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043485425,0.00008193909,0.00018114671,0.0026165869,0.0026318042,0.0027536494,0.0021862618,0.0008179453,0.0009711041],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026011225,0.00009151054,0.34616157,0.00031261,0.00005306882,0.0006528196,0.058999326,0.0005472112,0.00048282353,0.3496487,0.020615699,0.22217457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000123300515,0.000116991854,0.6680978,0.0006770304,0.00001906762,0.000506171,0.072189555,0.00052213855,0.00031877015,0.11380489,0.14369205,0.00004315513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005503699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008406357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014686139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088051776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005437031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049130023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212990044","doi":"10.53846/goediss-7016","title":"Essays on Gender, Migration, and Development","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wageningen University and Research; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Department for International Development; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; European Commission; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Inequality; Context (archaeology); Positive economics; Human capital; Human development (humanity); Development economics; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Geography; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03098655547547785,"score_gpt":0.3003881331497246,"score_spread":0.2694015776742468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212990044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009185933,0.3609681,0.0018810868,0.17173377,0.03772016,0.000046466324,0.00028170206,0.000050566592,0.41813222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15282774,0.3594868,0.002243778,0.024239881,0.034473583,0.00019380843,0.00040327365,0.00012331831,0.42600775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994217,0.00024762002,0.000028992024,0.00006803008,0.00013954152,0.00009414141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978249,0.0014342458,0.00014894168,0.00007784544,0.00027681614,0.00023733449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097521755,0.0007406746,0.00053299055,0.0015761153,0.0030097768,0.003202261,0.0005945462,0.0013486198,0.012498206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037020363,0.00018337113,0.00043101725,0.0020616788,0.0034935675,0.0028650872,0.0020352693,0.0027302655,0.001799776],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039022532,0.00006350755,0.0010697886,0.0006865039,0.000016497388,0.00026034703,0.009943664,0.0002413381,0.00021264475,0.44134027,0.47440067,0.07172578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004322106,0.000013320706,0.0008944562,0.0009492628,0.0000044518088,0.00008820389,0.0021607287,0.00003461289,0.000049508573,0.02499324,0.9708029,0.000004918421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017777527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026662517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012498206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022571136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020216184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04181063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213441932","doi":"10.1111/j.1752-1734.2007.00006.x","title":"NOTAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revista Internacional de Seguridad Social","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Social policy; Political science; Humanities; Poverty; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Citizenship; Sociology; Economic history; Art; Law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.02756787828538369,"score_gpt":0.32629827054793265,"score_spread":0.29873039226254894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213441932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043172983,0.0664998,0.00059866003,0.007746117,0.029425316,0.00027603217,0.03328266,0.0010742989,0.8606655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004271421,0.06424798,0.0013462785,0.0037974727,0.008205635,0.00047665462,0.031127919,0.0008354666,0.88569117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802005,0.00028771834,0.00021493038,0.00036289744,0.0008925863,0.00022177097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967014,0.00050568325,0.000240708,0.00040116106,0.0018860094,0.00026504786],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00107777,0.0018376476,0.002482906,0.02216801,0.0034741657,0.011302287,0.0021456073,0.0017262824,0.63187313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064454265,0.00086059433,0.0010022479,0.037853356,0.0011507401,0.0055003595,0.003012027,0.002584314,0.53203136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016165743,0.000023446437,0.00013771433,0.0006520445,0.0000053793506,0.000030131097,0.000086033346,0.0000498911,0.00007133421,0.0036054587,0.9335325,0.061790004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023741736,0.000003541269,0.0002481535,0.00041085613,0.0000019781537,0.00002605324,0.000071228955,0.000010185261,0.000014069715,0.00036401206,0.99884295,0.0000045559345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017612265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019400498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63187313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048565506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005419166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5250883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214775385","doi":"10.1177/01640275211046322","title":"My Wife Is My Insurance Policy: Household Bargaining and Couples’ Purchase of Long-Term Care Insurance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research on Aging","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Long-term care insurance; Wife; Bargaining power; Asset (computer security); Welfare; Demographic economics; Business; Test (biology); Term (time); Economics; Actuarial science; Health insurance; Labour economics; Health care; Long-term care; Microeconomics; Nursing; Medicine; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0974943649114532,"score_gpt":0.39914146532084555,"score_spread":0.30164710040939235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214775385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851413,0.0008479583,0.0003221404,0.002202352,0.000021956243,0.000007805198,0.000057381505,0.0000017860473,0.011397346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889356,0.00020970227,0.000028496626,0.00008490857,0.000009322095,0.0000023580244,0.000013470587,4.774549e-7,0.0007578113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999226,0.00045797892,0.000021301807,0.000044299755,0.00006054233,0.00018990802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967206,0.001648321,0.00084924354,0.000058911588,0.00010484643,0.0006181054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018499917,0.00010879187,0.00020313896,0.00048577404,0.0012883052,0.0015153354,0.00027442956,0.00068131293,0.0082162535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053314436,0.00014647904,0.00014958429,0.000592191,0.0008987692,0.0009387231,0.0008782533,0.0006629982,0.00043662442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004317613,0.00066581013,0.89199406,0.000049342296,0.00013784162,0.00092773425,0.019763917,0.002180492,0.00039123272,0.03693294,0.002888885,0.04363603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006537817,0.0002981571,0.85632837,0.00013378648,0.00007646864,0.00039011525,0.10494325,0.0049963216,0.00025863902,0.021398623,0.011072214,0.000038619495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008282898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010338904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008282898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089463824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006221271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027486145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214877123","doi":"10.46692/9781447315797.005","title":"Western industrial countries (I): women are able – in various ways","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.029047184925068654,"score_gpt":0.2577832892837293,"score_spread":0.22873610435866062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214877123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099430546,0.009144321,0.00043750225,0.012911743,0.001119772,0.00008588328,0.00048403867,0.00007615341,0.87631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.564172,0.014185559,0.0010729074,0.016017547,0.0006317549,0.00029369272,0.00061514776,0.00012224082,0.4028892],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995534,0.00009470296,0.000020910275,0.0000632196,0.000069113725,0.00019870547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997739,0.000023413266,0.000043852673,0.000021936743,0.000057099514,0.00007978763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005079004,0.0005455623,0.00024080514,0.0009929655,0.0048306086,0.0057198755,0.00030065162,0.00084809127,0.02624209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065308163,0.00019534827,0.00015979655,0.0025866146,0.002636388,0.0023465636,0.0025798266,0.0010626834,0.0056708087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016421753,0.00016677639,0.032827836,0.0008855798,0.000050679228,0.0024043277,0.20277567,0.00007277299,0.0014960736,0.14794435,0.3892789,0.2219329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011126094,0.000020106772,0.014824814,0.0004493338,0.000010954216,0.0003778628,0.063095234,0.000009807373,0.00014484568,0.0024760698,0.91856855,0.000011338873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014779997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026391933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02624209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009824028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011849203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08778852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220885494","doi":"10.1111/ecot.12322","title":"The effects of the Arab Spring on female labour force participation in the MENA region","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Middle East; Generalized method of moments; Estimator; Economics; Politics; Demographic economics; Spring (device); Empirical research; Panel data; Development economics; Econometrics; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.03819539443811044,"score_gpt":0.2646288217301869,"score_spread":0.2264334272920765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220885494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984535,0.00015685047,0.000034013032,0.00015266555,0.000005899181,0.0000020383582,0.00013517385,0.0000010247553,0.0010587897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995221,0.000106540094,0.000017825361,0.000013788015,0.0000064471205,0.0000026049715,0.000056610326,5.3860845e-7,0.00027357496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995091,0.00025784152,0.0000120699015,0.00003879986,0.000035778485,0.00014650944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928516,0.00025743,0.00021560771,0.0000303686,0.00007749127,0.00013393223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008361174,0.00017050773,0.00018655046,0.0003972307,0.00043954808,0.00061211194,0.00019849776,0.0002754482,0.002667368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015371463,0.00008204793,0.00023297475,0.00061498606,0.00046738575,0.00026650354,0.0008077149,0.00032495652,0.0002533935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033260533,0.00014332644,0.97640103,0.00005261865,0.00007656947,0.00045440948,0.0046725967,0.000595386,0.0010613053,0.0009767357,0.0007020378,0.01453149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026069833,0.00007389595,0.9920006,0.000023112072,0.000010984921,0.00005425759,0.0065410305,0.00019397841,0.00012446292,0.00007832542,0.00089302304,0.000003667128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018310629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027242616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018310629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046418453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045041624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036408126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221053428","doi":"10.33937/reveco.2022.250","title":"Determinantes de la participación económica de la mujer en México: un enfoque de calificación laboral","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Economía Facultad de Economía Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.010598539927835458,"score_gpt":0.2799403241234185,"score_spread":0.2693417841955831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221053428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921789,0.0011531657,0.00069076277,0.0009773811,0.000013595213,0.000029271689,0.0012792909,0.0000093271965,0.0036682042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959676,0.0009604166,0.00076383754,0.000058610407,0.000021437334,0.00005875384,0.0005882056,0.000003897273,0.0015770657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941826,0.00019653872,0.000025929001,0.00010583477,0.00009361126,0.00015974142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997008,0.00095280295,0.001263568,0.00013477249,0.0004373801,0.00020347067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014611398,0.00025247567,0.00036233524,0.0010452997,0.0010546945,0.0012063248,0.00042441502,0.0003824596,0.0028591119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033349919,0.00016557144,0.00037767662,0.0019462717,0.00040785605,0.00063205435,0.00087893225,0.0004960369,0.00013458585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007000246,0.000042208536,0.9842227,0.00009401912,0.000095270654,0.000083405306,0.0032227451,0.00035119316,0.00017721108,0.0011319714,0.0007192267,0.009790007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035746787,0.000044548495,0.99006313,0.0000940227,0.00005749318,0.00003017886,0.0049436935,0.00039823257,0.00007020437,0.00022681188,0.0040612905,0.0000067136793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15909664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16379452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15909664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016862924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018840242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31634122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223474230","doi":"10.1002/pam.22583","title":"The impact of parental benefits on disadvantaged households","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Poverty; Government (linguistics); Schedule; Demographic economics; Duration (music); Public economics; Business; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.020214075009356392,"score_gpt":0.34493187647378626,"score_spread":0.32471780146442986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223474230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957867,0.00024784688,0.00022080842,0.00041522097,0.000009360523,0.000019781184,0.00054020964,0.0000039451743,0.0027560282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991493,0.00006651504,0.00006815398,0.000047542322,0.0000030956667,0.000007842422,0.00010563731,6.0143617e-7,0.0005513126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997175,0.0015802053,0.000055960554,0.00024950525,0.00033406253,0.00060528156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945557,0.002357114,0.0017917362,0.00033606286,0.00041032323,0.0005491331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021031008,0.00016826436,0.00027994823,0.0006429131,0.0008134569,0.00066296436,0.00047260456,0.0003583943,0.004914375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008825,0.00008995315,0.00032696838,0.00075204804,0.0006507722,0.0002864551,0.0009761494,0.0004791081,0.00017824989],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015013479,0.00009397041,0.98340607,0.000031254764,0.00008827661,0.0001883473,0.00080177106,0.0008884925,0.0001725954,0.0012840037,0.000602132,0.012293067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008021049,0.00012780036,0.994466,0.000038785096,0.000060410544,0.000056990066,0.0022622985,0.0010819188,0.0001638373,0.0003759555,0.001351547,0.0000064617966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23875155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29875782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23875155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022141216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020385357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4747237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223505049","doi":"10.1515/bejeap-2020-0129","title":"Childcare, Parental Behavior and Well-Being during Childhood","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Developmental psychology; Psychology; Mental health; Depression (economics); Early childhood; Adverse Childhood Experiences; Psychiatry; Economics","score_opus":0.007972655367911355,"score_gpt":0.266944872771327,"score_spread":0.25897221740341564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223505049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985367,0.00043922703,0.000031305102,0.00010051183,0.0000061296123,0.0000029629339,0.00022526781,0.0000015974182,0.00065636775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999353,0.00021041986,0.000035024957,0.000022131419,0.0000047610615,0.0000039846755,0.00015370925,8.742725e-7,0.0002161554],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995148,0.00011933408,0.000027831484,0.00006140877,0.00007892663,0.0001976749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975994,0.00035354795,0.0011841943,0.000107688276,0.0001544415,0.0006005871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007906789,0.0002255447,0.0002601207,0.0006439906,0.0008348237,0.0011300773,0.00030909537,0.00054119463,0.0023595598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032672752,0.00017258998,0.00053242594,0.0008274186,0.0005850309,0.0005923773,0.0008389625,0.00084604474,0.00022785661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006111423,0.0001558759,0.9962759,0.000011051259,0.000055513796,0.00007724672,0.0004823152,0.00014205663,0.00012506373,0.00014932852,0.00011720517,0.0023473483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.5651224e-7,0.00003945758,0.9991937,0.000007417848,0.000009747212,0.000033382374,0.00047437797,0.000045342214,0.00004236892,0.000029342327,0.00012186961,0.0000021563771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032034777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04780628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032034777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084438286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005074897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06369662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224438317","doi":"10.1007/s10834-022-09844-1","title":"Intra-household Financial Inequality, Gender Equality, and Marital Dissolution","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Inequality; Asset (computer security); Earnings; Economics; Financial stability; Demographic economics; Perspective (graphical); Marital status; Finance; Financial system; Sociology","score_opus":0.0670204846297039,"score_gpt":0.30866764883760683,"score_spread":0.24164716420790294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224438317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941543,0.000495073,0.000051306022,0.0005682339,0.000011010922,0.000004149698,0.00006892191,6.5115194e-7,0.0046464074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994779,0.00014459135,0.0000113769165,0.000021587,0.0000071526824,0.0000024808683,0.000019662912,3.3743294e-7,0.00031491785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936396,0.00024172834,0.00003074037,0.000037097223,0.00007398752,0.0002525189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726164,0.0009837273,0.0007727202,0.000099831384,0.00015813035,0.0007239373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011310208,0.00013064579,0.0002914434,0.00089801336,0.0018757372,0.0014659439,0.00045355267,0.0005093235,0.007331661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006211171,0.00012969278,0.0002460911,0.0010832667,0.0014631553,0.0013649117,0.0017581041,0.00089916924,0.00021923773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025639412,0.00043336197,0.9763781,0.000016859642,0.000049369843,0.00025156574,0.0048857876,0.00012131674,0.00007018074,0.004570977,0.00043705315,0.012528981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000843216,0.00008431891,0.974282,0.000043820273,0.000026142437,0.00013811977,0.021864709,0.00024971436,0.000060823175,0.0021699502,0.0010644379,0.0000075032885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017452769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030149788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017452769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006710671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084205036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03470236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225166658","doi":"10.1177/00197939221093562","title":"Firm Pay Policies and the Gender Earnings Gap: The Mediating Role of Marital and Family Status","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Labor Relations Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada; Statistics Canada","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Earnings; Wage; Demographic economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Marital status; Labour economics; Gender gap; Gender pay gap; Business; Economics; Accounting; Demography; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.04495235406684127,"score_gpt":0.2893875380090785,"score_spread":0.24443518394223723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225166658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9327756,0.032189127,0.0003335864,0.0032625005,0.00009520158,0.00005634201,0.016272865,0.000020047735,0.0149947135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839606,0.0088396035,0.00023934114,0.0001707368,0.000023076984,0.000016772332,0.0044119125,0.00000515204,0.002332691],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992712,0.000063462794,0.000039828396,0.0000735253,0.00026018132,0.00029190714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969285,0.00057552074,0.00096808746,0.00008448508,0.00094480807,0.0004986301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012533118,0.00023230466,0.00038118617,0.0028071003,0.0014293955,0.0014683078,0.0009943458,0.00034052006,0.0027104574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004553554,0.00012249609,0.00056401663,0.0054008467,0.0005011332,0.00048532698,0.00089599326,0.00066086085,0.00023577789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000750193,0.00003928708,0.96114916,0.00017196621,0.0001035601,0.0001217997,0.0015673875,0.00016940752,0.000044199,0.0015427785,0.0048587685,0.03015664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039483325,0.000009935094,0.9914619,0.00020220244,0.000048880658,0.000035511886,0.0024701427,0.0001781531,0.000041070478,0.00013904965,0.0054017743,0.0000074340337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9638647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97903425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9638647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009168111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018440796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07269621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226008180","doi":"10.1093/esr/jcac019","title":"Women’s Relative Resources and Couples’ Gender Balance in Financial Decision-Making","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Sociological Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eesti Teadusagentuur","keywords":"Earnings; Realm; Demographic economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Finance; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.04891576853193198,"score_gpt":0.3178282318580403,"score_spread":0.26891246332610835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226008180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9666703,0.026865417,0.0002439985,0.000750417,0.000048739334,0.0000057509174,0.0001209637,0.0000014430661,0.005293009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951351,0.0044040564,0.000061955725,0.000042078518,0.000019977166,0.0000027297722,0.00003007867,5.856264e-7,0.0003034054],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930346,0.0004206879,0.000031804997,0.000062629995,0.00009412632,0.00008725334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788517,0.0011284363,0.00062658294,0.000046595847,0.00010627172,0.0002070126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017940446,0.00016589652,0.00026109844,0.0009053339,0.00034756673,0.0008782068,0.00022374232,0.00027136772,0.0026737002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044925436,0.00007815186,0.00021281613,0.0009948451,0.0007451185,0.0004217819,0.0006158556,0.00026248847,0.00012414709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002190022,0.00014481485,0.8781674,0.00043186665,0.00030171688,0.00040765005,0.0084826285,0.00030141202,0.00043807641,0.0059103193,0.00079107523,0.10440403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004392012,0.000102093065,0.98484486,0.00023754356,0.00006429301,0.00038612282,0.007570087,0.00017968626,0.00010030993,0.0019587048,0.0045377463,0.000014178618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035507507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047664354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035507507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043898218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009487927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226287021","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v23i7.4868","title":"The Labor Market Effects of State and Local Expansions of the Earned Income Tax Credit","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Current Population Survey; Incentive; Economics; Differential (mechanical device); Labour economics; State (computer science); Population; Work (physics); Differential effects; Government (linguistics); Demographic economics; Tax credit; Medicine; Public economics","score_opus":0.006355612789857142,"score_gpt":0.2113910501570518,"score_spread":0.20503543736719468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226287021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928779,0.0004031976,0.000094269235,0.00044051098,0.000014734493,0.00001768876,0.0003787655,0.0000039231527,0.005768994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809355,0.00020422653,0.000034298337,0.000050030256,0.0000147055725,0.0000074365744,0.00018003344,9.970478e-7,0.0014146911],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920875,0.00031871285,0.000025780078,0.00007737576,0.00013848487,0.00023094077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955024,0.0019364639,0.001600084,0.000106143314,0.0002963021,0.00055856863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010513058,0.000109152876,0.00026139486,0.00070887926,0.0006030612,0.0008927321,0.0003322889,0.00037118388,0.0068006776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045375656,0.00010210046,0.00030602742,0.0009826261,0.00054013304,0.00043192727,0.00082302134,0.00053423486,0.00027562972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009494762,0.0010904334,0.9423162,0.000090856585,0.00020777079,0.00040495378,0.0011345901,0.004235427,0.0011433716,0.00494039,0.0020747508,0.04141178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018195182,0.0004003784,0.9917806,0.00002865642,0.00004975859,0.000037961345,0.0029329476,0.0011926236,0.00029955772,0.00044370818,0.0028071476,0.000008583892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030490583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078370504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030490583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013607447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010569964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06062621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229057974","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.53.2.070","title":"Ghanaian Couples’ Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Women’s Participation in Family Fishery Decisions and Practices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empowerment; Spouse; Perception; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Hegemony; Women's empowerment; Gender studies; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Economic growth; Geography; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.18216067941080188,"score_gpt":0.4491097522383184,"score_spread":0.2669490728275165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229057974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970304,0.00033800644,0.00009744793,0.0004743688,0.000008630777,0.0000072955518,0.000011047928,8.040754e-7,0.0020319629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924904,0.00027765968,0.000044925473,0.00007004546,0.0000035530215,0.0000053638028,0.0000050566664,6.3118125e-7,0.00034368283],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849296,0.0010405952,0.000053167187,0.00007202498,0.00014219987,0.00019898251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979619,0.0010085062,0.0005763783,0.000048598842,0.00013848655,0.00026621626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033223268,0.0002342966,0.00021205249,0.0007016583,0.0035117837,0.0019913502,0.00022903389,0.00045402648,0.0040490483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005093,0.00023389842,0.00013072105,0.000752961,0.0032639322,0.0013486987,0.0016875812,0.00060462666,0.00014245087],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000900539,0.000051455478,0.16388166,0.00007000388,0.000014639253,0.0009457742,0.8188727,0.00004807324,0.00094810996,0.0015786611,0.00035702216,0.013141848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005524915,0.00009047976,0.06850997,0.00006812955,0.000006997975,0.0003477768,0.9266981,0.000042336138,0.00014694751,0.000311569,0.0037617916,0.000010295632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018303527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024440695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018303527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012900432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097131607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03639394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229765696","doi":"10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs298","title":"Household Labor","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Encyclopedia of Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Work (physics); Child care; Care work; Labour economics; Paid work; Work hours; Psychology; Demographic economics; Working hours; Business; Nursing; Economics; Medicine; Economic growth; Engineering","score_opus":0.04064396518996104,"score_gpt":0.31734699125333327,"score_spread":0.2767030260633722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229765696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04113134,0.006990407,0.001027589,0.0044694594,0.00073273934,0.00012552727,0.003897133,0.000088929606,0.9415369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33393127,0.012715842,0.0009307193,0.0015332571,0.00048203577,0.00023065507,0.0036195288,0.00005850211,0.6464982],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995024,0.00013117226,0.000025860749,0.00006889587,0.000116865565,0.00015471604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952996,0.000082939034,0.00007363452,0.00005479416,0.00011551163,0.00014324076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037295825,0.0002844032,0.0001937936,0.0010910357,0.0018417966,0.0025216723,0.0006210758,0.0004402366,0.10670168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014035753,0.00008015692,0.00017825226,0.0019158197,0.0008713964,0.0015384898,0.0019720946,0.00053332467,0.01295214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096240976,0.00013938216,0.019835494,0.0006802821,0.000014222513,0.0006320677,0.022912128,0.00026803632,0.00054792373,0.3164878,0.28893656,0.34944984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027381775,0.00002304626,0.013035669,0.0004295603,0.0000025841755,0.00016676864,0.01540356,0.00003946597,0.00013481105,0.0076781907,0.96307844,0.00000519166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009860297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008403957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10670168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001751322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024550615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35695267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231083336","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v21i9.2687","title":"Intra-household Manageable Income and the Choice on Self or Other Expenditures","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Demographic economics; Engel curve; Public economics; Labour economics; Low income; Business; Aggregate expenditure","score_opus":0.014788434771373943,"score_gpt":0.22430669418957677,"score_spread":0.20951825941820282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231083336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997273,0.000059974824,0.00014480141,0.000038133807,0.0000012915284,0.0000040777313,0.00014671436,0.0000013832641,0.0023305952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989814,0.000048005473,0.000072070936,0.00000439982,0.0000020954994,0.0000031487307,0.00013100391,0.0000011107335,0.000756691],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997458,0.00010759492,0.000016503016,0.000027906708,0.000034629356,0.00006762876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804556,0.0008393271,0.00060489646,0.0001270103,0.00009175162,0.00029147347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067854155,0.0001409019,0.0001549843,0.00082850293,0.00025824955,0.00058986794,0.00015569988,0.00021714655,0.0072274245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024697762,0.00007795209,0.00019935583,0.0007166062,0.00032115993,0.00051763275,0.00038345568,0.00025445851,0.0003046374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025959837,0.00022547439,0.9778861,0.000013419651,0.0000650284,0.00019963257,0.00061194616,0.0007184159,0.00057964266,0.004126497,0.00025383692,0.015060518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004480687,0.00005470011,0.9961809,0.000006604877,0.000012828161,0.000071642666,0.0007890067,0.0008175079,0.00012404623,0.001231655,0.00070102065,0.0000056721624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047907797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008167682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072274245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041081427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016790407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024178147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232418781","doi":"10.18226/35353535.v5.2016.06","title":"O gasto público com gestante: um estudo no município de Vacaria/RS","year":2016,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Mostra de Iniciação Científica, Pós-graduação, Pesquisa e Extensão","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Nurses in Oncology","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03473859717513949,"score_gpt":0.29663412680900453,"score_spread":0.26189552963386503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232418781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976604,0.00018147744,0.00004372026,0.00025355341,0.000003141369,0.000012807321,0.000073652496,0.0000028347038,0.0017684768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989813,0.00022683026,0.00007810738,0.00003748159,0.0000034318614,0.000013136474,0.00002330643,0.0000022989855,0.0006340171],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906033,0.00035020895,0.00004591661,0.00010625309,0.00014132445,0.00029582914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828976,0.0006404643,0.000492262,0.00012386931,0.00015005421,0.00030364384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011827642,0.00021353606,0.00036284336,0.0008817964,0.002001858,0.0016842553,0.00080533815,0.0009003956,0.002557363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038409745,0.00043488768,0.0003761926,0.0018786131,0.0018967439,0.0012948477,0.0029937483,0.0007879167,0.00021683848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119099845,0.00023175443,0.6989425,0.00028344634,0.000044696913,0.0013379606,0.27521816,0.000102627506,0.002013359,0.0024170254,0.0005448279,0.018744485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007046989,0.00019688136,0.6499503,0.00013217774,0.00004438777,0.00036837376,0.3413371,0.00014072181,0.00028692547,0.0002383378,0.0072850245,0.000012760217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13961293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21583556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13961293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028541472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041386746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27760053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232430011","doi":"10.2307/3341465","title":"Who Cares? Women's Work, Childcare, and Welfare State Redesign","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Welfare; Work (physics); Welfare state; State (computer science); Gender studies; Engineering; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.017813337025199442,"score_gpt":0.2433334612445187,"score_spread":0.22552012421931927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232430011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61408705,0.003937907,0.00053654483,0.2855535,0.00037075242,0.000018179677,0.00017218254,0.000020818154,0.095303066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931189,0.0008412833,0.0000994583,0.002356584,0.000066995504,0.0000078642015,0.000016181386,0.000005229284,0.0034875446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974922,0.00099694,0.00003107208,0.00012465879,0.00019693222,0.001158301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974433,0.0007280978,0.0004673306,0.00008233776,0.00027457703,0.0010043941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035419902,0.00014237672,0.00027477593,0.0009084594,0.0073818243,0.0062033613,0.0010542816,0.0024946064,0.007737259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069499635,0.00021871451,0.00030784166,0.0015474868,0.007646786,0.004785926,0.0020482964,0.0020950073,0.00022591875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029521648,0.00042883813,0.22677316,0.00014632239,0.00007802033,0.0011282112,0.24540603,0.0006432471,0.0004508558,0.35927352,0.044925444,0.120451115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004464154,0.00008203853,0.15555792,0.0002747584,0.00007219316,0.00028363647,0.7044325,0.00043097752,0.00029158368,0.035866167,0.1026117,0.000051921328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33032194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61202586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6696781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014077387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025152426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6567985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232453526","doi":"10.3138/9781442609730","title":"Welfare Reform in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Welfare reform; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019262942957227587,"score_gpt":0.2129672479717969,"score_spread":0.1937043050145693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232453526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0219742,0.048448194,0.00038982628,0.12403016,0.0030127666,0.0001617909,0.001680295,0.00010574322,0.8001972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1527721,0.023544963,0.00059678935,0.01620524,0.000362257,0.000106485284,0.00051476643,0.00009009373,0.80580723],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997361,0.0001861541,0.000038386024,0.00015778065,0.0006926424,0.0015639327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888223,0.00007519376,0.000021779328,0.000037184443,0.00048701986,0.00049653306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011054792,0.00067710323,0.0006734841,0.0019239343,0.02017664,0.008754971,0.0014065639,0.0037108706,0.031225184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029729684,0.00055585225,0.00055375794,0.004684174,0.004139026,0.0016469002,0.003177719,0.0046008984,0.0017215016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004358217,0.00006527078,0.0018670991,0.00014793023,0.000023795737,0.00024058335,0.0036073567,0.00085349,0.00013352725,0.4114878,0.52797043,0.053559024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015979442,0.000010440281,0.0057650725,0.00022759904,0.00001532155,0.000025953008,0.003466958,0.00021733338,0.000065692766,0.007926684,0.9822365,0.000026471953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99706763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18983635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18983635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41902554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.939675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234688580","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/n95gm","title":"American Exceptionalism Revisited: Tax Relief, Poverty Reduction, and the Politics of Child Tax Credits","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Exceptionalism; American exceptionalism; Tax credit; Poverty; Cash; Tax policy; Economics; Child poverty; Tax reform; Welfare; Social policy; Politics; Political science; Public economics; Political economy; Economic growth; Law; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.0135560690862212,"score_gpt":0.2730601113395709,"score_spread":0.2595040422533497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234688580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31692368,0.013382235,0.0019280664,0.31248719,0.0009656333,0.000009359832,0.00006732238,0.00003564454,0.35420087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782431,0.0018942279,0.00021286655,0.0145607935,0.00028669988,0.00000681579,0.00001053715,0.000012820341,0.0047720037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977112,0.0010329637,0.000033323307,0.00023019958,0.00034964064,0.00064269395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829453,0.0007698174,0.0002078847,0.00009539628,0.0002199554,0.0004124406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027993412,0.00016800464,0.0002446901,0.0009070522,0.014264934,0.0058089504,0.00064738345,0.0033024757,0.002202697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027007202,0.00015395091,0.00027041702,0.0013001325,0.026630646,0.0034184763,0.0039670905,0.0071393307,0.00010958818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011901164,0.000017274364,0.0015930737,0.00001278584,0.0000041573285,0.00012851432,0.015192852,0.00009818883,0.00006425388,0.9689214,0.007251136,0.0067043924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002456066,0.000025970785,0.013885377,0.00032606148,0.000021745598,0.0002889888,0.048852306,0.00058983214,0.00036439975,0.52664506,0.4089164,0.000059273698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09776816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13310109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09776816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013588444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008669635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19439816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235249498","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190841300.003.0006","title":"The United States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tax credit; Earned income tax credit; Double taxation; State income tax; Direct tax; Tax reform; Public economics; Tax avoidance; Indirect tax; Value-added tax; Ad valorem tax; Economics; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02425542850481776,"score_gpt":0.2352908958480303,"score_spread":0.21103546734321255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235249498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033887007,0.0043288977,0.00017537996,0.0018336097,0.0010393531,0.00003180966,0.0028552476,0.00025211138,0.98914474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00297861,0.004400031,0.00034723975,0.0011719437,0.00016812376,0.00005230022,0.0026062361,0.00010953489,0.988166],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995876,0.00003747384,0.000022674669,0.00010016657,0.00017536095,0.000076718105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996939,0.00002691835,0.000022496057,0.000040911535,0.00016442865,0.00005138185],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031294263,0.00086564815,0.00053049513,0.0014795399,0.0024491642,0.004814934,0.0008188749,0.0019096615,0.50661004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010269999,0.0002753862,0.00037023568,0.0028337408,0.00060119096,0.0034427126,0.0020731841,0.0019527551,0.39202467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000208383,0.000021475948,0.00030480846,0.0001247392,0.0000042649876,0.00011955348,0.00015793287,0.000029354953,0.0001334283,0.030158462,0.8645215,0.10440368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015918621,0.0000028432132,0.00016411534,0.000053719534,9.00401e-7,0.0000408196,0.000049838243,0.00000500749,0.00001799614,0.0007050416,0.9989562,0.0000018878302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0147868935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024048349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9852131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017823356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026830405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70376086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235932404","doi":"10.3917/pope.203.0447","title":"Family Policies in Industrialized Countries: Is There Convergence?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Population (English Edition)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Developed country; Divergence (linguistics); Developing country; Welfare; Demographic economics; Economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Population; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.04265769083477622,"score_gpt":0.2865380233561922,"score_spread":0.243880332521416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235932404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97739476,0.013148671,0.00042706475,0.0016907757,0.00004551523,0.000009056899,0.00032591473,0.000016670458,0.006941482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99552405,0.003582707,0.0002254962,0.00013250107,0.000036035548,0.00000767484,0.0003353313,0.0000036655474,0.00015249761],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872285,0.0004638186,0.00013130515,0.00020294181,0.00018818965,0.00029083213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99513334,0.0017912388,0.0014050902,0.00038093186,0.0009357139,0.00035371695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028861854,0.0001976462,0.0005792789,0.00454395,0.0007399984,0.0020764817,0.00034998218,0.00053002225,0.0014228942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011427062,0.00018383663,0.00028511614,0.0057675014,0.0012701034,0.0023655612,0.0017793975,0.00060464424,0.00015552106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009900063,0.000038528997,0.9221902,0.00014700423,0.00014030855,0.00023192036,0.00818388,0.0006544731,0.000065347485,0.0036532907,0.0009245906,0.06367149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053685985,0.000060496754,0.98856026,0.00019255262,0.000033717173,0.00015925766,0.0068242494,0.00028403368,0.00004930463,0.00095793104,0.0028619275,0.00001104877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017073046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0152611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017073046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010678748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008343041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03394729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237784810","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_102568","title":"Mothering and Immigrants","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Demographic economics; History; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.020297980307521286,"score_gpt":0.248802767477691,"score_spread":0.22850478717016973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237784810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035536114,0.09277274,0.00031744916,0.02922625,0.0039468496,0.000020579291,0.00003436461,0.00002140087,0.83812433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3385792,0.08040751,0.00060114963,0.010969974,0.0023412656,0.00007993718,0.000051994084,0.0000494825,0.56691957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965096,0.00020337911,0.000006099874,0.000023630702,0.000038927312,0.000077039185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99984396,0.00006411253,0.000015552447,0.000011010428,0.000020319103,0.0000451054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055191945,0.0004260868,0.0002483733,0.00042816577,0.005493449,0.002509664,0.00053509715,0.0012371058,0.014246045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010593458,0.0001352275,0.00014216902,0.0005330469,0.0031017205,0.0016713715,0.002134632,0.002373281,0.0014243631],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036063695,0.00009158126,0.0011403513,0.00014671817,0.000006107319,0.0006905389,0.0781577,0.000051903502,0.00016892538,0.69261956,0.12178686,0.10510372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007673313,0.00003877272,0.0018414843,0.00094266183,0.000007050277,0.00034799337,0.054822307,0.000051747487,0.00012923303,0.035931844,0.90587,0.000009136344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007926121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021341756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014246045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014386025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001863942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047657788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238471791","doi":"10.1017/9781108235594.029","title":"Findings from CBAs of Welfare-to-Work Programs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Valuation (finance); Contingent valuation; Preference; Craft; Variety (cybernetics); Cost–benefit analysis; Welfare; Cover (algebra); Time preference; Actuarial science; Work (physics); Computer science; Economics; Management science; Operations research; Willingness to pay; Microeconomics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Accounting","score_opus":0.027412867345064228,"score_gpt":0.22364037653296592,"score_spread":0.1962275091879017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238471791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21097094,0.015443242,0.0050966954,0.018462269,0.00061697926,0.0010094517,0.017666027,0.0001975928,0.7305367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8726857,0.016269589,0.0067473254,0.0045498996,0.00025989403,0.0015268876,0.0079569295,0.00021752389,0.089786336],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927857,0.002834504,0.00026060152,0.00060340395,0.002730107,0.0007857456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.970148,0.019787448,0.0015702327,0.0013255917,0.00610127,0.0010674696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00909489,0.00047126037,0.0006011145,0.0055425134,0.0031363307,0.004912272,0.0018707331,0.000954091,0.01952933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04029023,0.0003131841,0.00063782645,0.013303838,0.001779157,0.0035259523,0.0028247973,0.002064298,0.0015791218],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072667823,0.00085390045,0.06351525,0.0035638597,0.00018004938,0.00042285607,0.03472281,0.0028139118,0.0005569651,0.20321089,0.1610892,0.5283437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059822225,0.00033781107,0.3513053,0.0060890405,0.00016756229,0.00020264133,0.07328847,0.0017862046,0.0013672168,0.031102838,0.5342248,0.0000683744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07756171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08656043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07756171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017096598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012253746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15422052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238657636","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1834","title":"Social Incentives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04028323500440672,"score_gpt":0.28911599617661304,"score_spread":0.24883276117220632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238657636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012315491,0.00048817688,0.004539796,0.0026984476,0.00018091165,0.000048577145,0.000091507034,0.000043810527,0.99067724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11933288,0.0015058552,0.0037096338,0.0029217596,0.0004446251,0.00028986382,0.00017858656,0.00007905429,0.8715377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987618,0.0004630065,0.00003271955,0.00022501215,0.00033118232,0.00018622469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991647,0.00029862102,0.000059457783,0.00018415993,0.00018501846,0.00010810366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015287459,0.00069386757,0.00042878115,0.0010057474,0.002053465,0.004714365,0.001024259,0.0028564606,0.13005073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004177808,0.00034235072,0.00038919217,0.00078875053,0.003093182,0.0037461391,0.002214642,0.0025488336,0.01758773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042752395,0.0000144471505,0.00006599307,0.000014055185,0.000001532656,0.0000104485725,0.00010087723,0.00011024463,0.000057530648,0.97626185,0.0138364425,0.009522325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012759792,0.00001795432,0.000377548,0.000108435066,0.0000041895137,0.00007829689,0.00031557787,0.00049300987,0.0002029716,0.4829164,0.5154649,0.000007919856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002030104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003717837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13005073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028337422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024507234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43506306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239402263","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_101536","title":"Gender Gap Index","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.048733442326757546,"score_gpt":0.2802732377146182,"score_spread":0.23153979538786065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239402263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007886944,0.0072949207,0.0011520922,0.003081674,0.0019033368,0.00012153331,0.02611455,0.00032126694,0.9521238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2210881,0.02421106,0.005872785,0.00336123,0.003182446,0.0010004393,0.06350555,0.00073225435,0.6770461],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989489,0.00012138245,0.000059238715,0.0001246524,0.0005766956,0.00016919468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984207,0.00041425333,0.00012880168,0.00007570257,0.00066146604,0.0002990719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008421331,0.00057863747,0.0005452356,0.008301273,0.0012076217,0.0022170858,0.00077918416,0.00054258096,0.15394616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047139847,0.00009643877,0.00029279414,0.008025945,0.0004409792,0.0023718928,0.0020868082,0.0007032985,0.047472637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010993266,0.00005795592,0.0045623044,0.00042612109,0.000010915806,0.00007526837,0.0009134251,0.00012360944,0.00019548634,0.06549807,0.67593026,0.25209668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008163353,0.000040345894,0.011717393,0.0004242959,0.000009211267,0.00026102847,0.0019196593,0.00008020197,0.00019444533,0.016827574,0.9685071,0.000010549415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002977043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036733882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15394616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011364364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015217665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5150012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239551403","doi":"10.4095/301150","title":"Female Median Income (1995$)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.04601399354884545,"score_gpt":0.3385777792932487,"score_spread":0.2925637857444033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239551403","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031000009,0.0012880343,0.00042278896,0.00067879,0.00045699565,0.0001782489,0.63686335,0.0007766415,0.32833514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.117885225,0.0038925058,0.0014690828,0.00040963193,0.00014965962,0.0005142865,0.66052806,0.00023258978,0.21491894],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997137,0.000014104507,0.000015683328,0.000037717982,0.0001153389,0.00010333244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970967,0.000009619407,0.000045640663,0.000008211376,0.00018890236,0.00003796431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012941001,0.0007660584,0.0002446276,0.002339538,0.00047217793,0.0009037391,0.00060281385,0.0001740164,0.07736868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005441681,0.00011495902,0.00029304187,0.0035175502,0.00009184269,0.0007436249,0.00067471055,0.00044464713,0.034435008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006755757,0.00003168876,0.023046423,0.00018466897,0.000016170441,0.00010107972,0.00018418864,0.00022293332,0.00019726457,0.0015130579,0.9320565,0.042378526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014288924,0.00003364368,0.20373887,0.00018088207,0.0000074006566,0.00017169233,0.00065684156,0.00015844485,0.00019451116,0.00020241262,0.79462725,0.000013747763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15283595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12864673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15283595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010256808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010502342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30389273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239594968","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-54775-2","title":"Sustainable Birth in Disruptive Times","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Global maternal and child health","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Politics; Human sexuality; Health care; Power (physics); Business; Political science; Development economics; Economic growth; Environmental health; Economics; Sociology; Medicine; Gender studies; Population","score_opus":0.007690702996647777,"score_gpt":0.27678381854208184,"score_spread":0.2690931155454341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239594968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005687235,0.0276489,0.0025484494,0.022206388,0.0023034487,0.000028964203,0.00007268308,0.00006592804,0.939438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22070771,0.05128326,0.0030777275,0.0058638714,0.0015265301,0.00016971906,0.00014776022,0.00015531076,0.71706814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999716,0.00013534671,0.0000060353564,0.000020237623,0.000056579745,0.0000657572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997142,0.00012879033,0.000021714537,0.000029960975,0.000032658492,0.00007263107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007269664,0.00040059275,0.00029336472,0.0004383027,0.002877534,0.0034014,0.00047226992,0.0013464084,0.01238964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013851884,0.00016641982,0.00018070819,0.0009032114,0.0057644835,0.0027003158,0.0026438914,0.0025507475,0.0019975652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065865165,0.000014855717,0.00018627141,0.00003362064,0.000002256381,0.00008963494,0.0054424237,0.00019308079,0.00006298407,0.9081852,0.05056448,0.0352186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002958422,0.000018172064,0.0006710337,0.000246465,0.0000027116337,0.00011398231,0.010725789,0.0001276035,0.000090885704,0.28018662,0.7078073,0.0000065255176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057404893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016730435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01238964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020309754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04144746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239750180","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.42.6.927","title":"Judith Treas and Sonja Drobniè, Eds. <b>Dividing The Domestic: Men, Women, and Household Work in a Cross-National Perspective.</b> Stanford: Stanford University Press","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Work (physics); Gender studies; Art; Engineering","score_opus":0.13532816172292042,"score_gpt":0.35846371251147513,"score_spread":0.2231355507885547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239750180","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031180997,0.97077054,0.00035996022,0.017591376,0.0029192658,0.000008557966,0.000112666756,0.000035600362,0.007890141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005329661,0.96934736,0.0010697154,0.0029261592,0.002338891,0.000029143519,0.0001498542,0.000031698775,0.01877759],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916935,0.000247857,0.000071993265,0.00009953478,0.00032903586,0.0000823424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836475,0.0007492941,0.000138224,0.000053937398,0.00037741358,0.00031647814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016486353,0.001998599,0.0012408374,0.0028321757,0.001957316,0.0031439594,0.0017269852,0.0024409427,0.013019156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021324037,0.0012720344,0.0007664235,0.0040996526,0.001926013,0.007826005,0.0013429967,0.0036152867,0.0077082086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039060837,0.000028056656,0.00070637057,0.0005979202,0.000013968726,0.000090130634,0.0018924596,0.00009432764,0.00008875461,0.0052417414,0.86456877,0.12663834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012125521,0.000018216386,0.0050285715,0.0024132768,0.000028665396,0.00049975247,0.004374727,0.000084724124,0.00016675415,0.008911188,0.97843677,0.00002528458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046706844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092832096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046706844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019832917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048002372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240049968","doi":"10.1002/pam.1025.abs","title":"Moving Up, Moving Out, or Going Nowhere? A Study of the Employment Patterns of Young Women and the Implications for Welfare Mothers","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Annie E. Casey Foundation","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Welfare; National Longitudinal Surveys; Welfare reform; Welfare system; Work (physics); Labour economics; Demographic economics; Single mothers; Longitudinal data; Economics; Public policy; Business; Psychology; Sociology; Economic growth; Demography","score_opus":0.02487727975704034,"score_gpt":0.3229179691457291,"score_spread":0.2980406893886888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240049968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960289,0.000805484,0.000040807445,0.001299984,0.000016508877,0.0000056536705,0.000054826865,8.212218e-7,0.0017471365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964366,0.0016494339,0.00004657598,0.00034502734,0.000011955566,0.000016557806,0.000037646936,0.0000020046518,0.0014541358],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960476,0.00014826392,0.000013600306,0.000027644366,0.000036632267,0.00016912715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993304,0.00024726914,0.00017917901,0.00001543382,0.00005719395,0.00017061709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012467057,0.000108240965,0.0001949657,0.0005961529,0.0023552207,0.0014671624,0.0002882179,0.0005209213,0.0022944992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030107112,0.00022014891,0.00020057952,0.00085684354,0.0010369755,0.0014449774,0.0009924802,0.0007170554,0.00030436943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017746325,0.00020640985,0.7547183,0.0000881212,0.000022870126,0.0009140442,0.18959461,0.000047344955,0.00044795495,0.0032958544,0.0023982937,0.04808865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012743245,0.00016397197,0.5785727,0.00021385853,0.00002106025,0.00040061554,0.41099605,0.00006850058,0.00020820719,0.00083201344,0.008499063,0.000011216429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015967548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031199321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015967548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010188014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011134344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03174919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241334353","doi":"10.3138/cpp.35.4.389","title":"Taxes, Transfers, and Canadian Income Inequality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Undoing; Labour economics; Transfer payment; Inequality; Gross income; Income distribution; Economic inequality; State income tax; Income tax; Income inequality metrics; Tax reform; Public economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.02675285249187233,"score_gpt":0.2816017451127977,"score_spread":0.25484889262092536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241334353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7234377,0.0075388784,0.000800979,0.015647588,0.00013274721,0.000048634098,0.0037756036,0.000044564084,0.24857323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98510945,0.002501605,0.0002566719,0.00035971892,0.000021486323,0.000008384735,0.00052530866,0.000007693254,0.01120969],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911505,0.000045277287,0.000011406305,0.000052731055,0.00027791646,0.00049762195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991097,0.000088376175,0.0001506359,0.000027329454,0.00039821368,0.00022572748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005494716,0.00024841193,0.00021948328,0.002520827,0.005248527,0.0018398006,0.0006002042,0.00037363905,0.00883672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002408599,0.000082751896,0.00031858886,0.0043899785,0.0015633546,0.0006277762,0.0012413113,0.000857055,0.0001863375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002809044,0.00013741384,0.50828445,0.00016563485,0.00009254229,0.00048455223,0.011621133,0.0039935154,0.0006976727,0.2948835,0.03115517,0.14820348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026413993,0.000026863876,0.8841867,0.00019906019,0.000060076556,0.00011385968,0.008964978,0.0021410573,0.00045028445,0.01104928,0.09273337,0.000048078302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05867871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05867871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041305754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42574584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242140863","doi":"10.4095/301357","title":"Marital Status, 2001: Divorced (by census division)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Division (mathematics); Marital status; Geography; Psychology; Demography; Regional science; Sociology; Mathematics; Population; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.03411974083124514,"score_gpt":0.3224623345542506,"score_spread":0.28834259372300547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242140863","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014541989,0.00083560037,0.00013981208,0.00043652768,0.00020839866,0.0003524023,0.96858495,0.00011226611,0.0147880055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04302289,0.0038722502,0.0008730983,0.00056876644,0.00009950591,0.0009285977,0.9151019,0.00006729582,0.035465702],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993605,0.00003608318,0.000080723235,0.000059659844,0.00032487905,0.00013814206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708766,0.00009780995,0.00040416143,0.00006894797,0.0019914554,0.00035008424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070043805,0.0010133345,0.0003545519,0.0036952135,0.0013275399,0.0010346486,0.0013834098,0.0005257246,0.013235004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028964833,0.0004817452,0.000391837,0.0068013184,0.0002167056,0.0009280925,0.000903161,0.0014624101,0.008513883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012298969,0.00015247645,0.071010955,0.0005575177,0.000037644448,0.000078320954,0.0005258517,0.0003313582,0.00021649832,0.0006734535,0.9093124,0.016980495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009109137,0.0000614892,0.7579621,0.00048901525,0.000034685483,0.00013362788,0.0015905856,0.00033734232,0.00034992446,0.00015464753,0.23876575,0.000029715211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6344401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72018546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6344401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003762646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064116595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7354255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243212481","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/x6ph4","title":"Decline in Marriage Associated with the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Metropolitan area; Cohabitation; Demography; Closure (psychology); Demographic economics; Outbreak; Government (linguistics); Geography; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Political science; Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Economics; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.07713733899052433,"score_gpt":0.33923428053169596,"score_spread":0.26209694154117164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243212481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936232,0.0006402236,0.00011686858,0.0015105214,0.000048575923,0.000014749393,0.0012910567,0.00000963809,0.0027453145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975641,0.0004082829,0.00007899497,0.00025172468,0.000036975995,0.00000954852,0.0011751933,0.00000302152,0.00047211433],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995252,0.00012909294,0.000035158173,0.000082725666,0.00008812948,0.00013971791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974045,0.0003003175,0.0011693339,0.000102215214,0.00047715098,0.0005463483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011369241,0.00010679598,0.00022563503,0.0007999208,0.0009264471,0.0008243871,0.00035920047,0.00046544438,0.0035582664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00542417,0.0001263397,0.00018795434,0.0012110786,0.00053716294,0.000641902,0.0013186089,0.0010539282,0.00021103029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010935735,0.000060465598,0.982467,0.000030009642,0.000028015927,0.00010158814,0.0012444821,0.00011475361,0.00015447618,0.00028612895,0.0024007256,0.01300299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001259357,0.000034307046,0.9969797,0.000024304518,0.000003203551,0.00004561241,0.0018551548,0.00010299669,0.000026162921,0.00005031002,0.0008739562,0.0000031078705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07088983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.120169625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07088983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010319902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080187956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14095443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243673869","doi":"10.4095/301368","title":"Marital Status, 2006: Divorced (by census division)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Division (mathematics); Geography; Marital status; Demography; Sociology; Mathematics; Population; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.02646397584800037,"score_gpt":0.31264444957807896,"score_spread":0.2861804737300786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243673869","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061571386,0.0019916412,0.00026052966,0.0005974912,0.0002298283,0.00043470276,0.9124606,0.0001473265,0.022306452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15377611,0.0067868163,0.001884145,0.00048702196,0.00012868851,0.0005724837,0.79323393,0.00007887183,0.04305195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943537,0.000022667931,0.000070037815,0.000043359098,0.00031176626,0.00011667922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982723,0.000031897293,0.00025175305,0.00003526862,0.0011951405,0.00021358953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004661648,0.00058890815,0.00026624653,0.0033199799,0.0012034011,0.0008665667,0.001049557,0.00025425333,0.008744632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022543685,0.00032588074,0.00041198317,0.006347069,0.00016224016,0.0005781857,0.00077474286,0.0007715546,0.0032657755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023960226,0.00016647912,0.40806097,0.00085063436,0.00010169533,0.00013732177,0.0011817083,0.0005178912,0.0005213566,0.00095425884,0.5457129,0.041555163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000328432,0.00002588594,0.9012252,0.00012947526,0.000017571469,0.000095360425,0.00085313217,0.00017175094,0.0001862995,0.000062567706,0.09718652,0.000013342196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8529963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9142366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14700371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004623776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074439924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29573888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243745314","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_100588","title":"Cohabitation Gap","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03542945652670217,"score_gpt":0.27965412227404324,"score_spread":0.24422466574734106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243745314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024247002,0.0044104806,0.0016329349,0.007340475,0.0005413739,0.000037117126,0.00016351439,0.000022467526,0.96160465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5563942,0.0074144932,0.0014938443,0.0058335634,0.00084314396,0.0002584347,0.0004704146,0.00008221097,0.42720968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957436,0.000104942155,0.000011735586,0.00008663836,0.00009777926,0.00012460383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997043,0.00009697322,0.00001995933,0.000028291202,0.00005210118,0.00009840718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004788785,0.00021279886,0.00030035136,0.00062297494,0.0022930903,0.0022010272,0.0008149081,0.0008250394,0.055381104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014230825,0.00010089394,0.00022901902,0.0006076368,0.0020842995,0.002597222,0.0033860772,0.002255965,0.004945404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030652656,0.000049476377,0.00078160514,0.00004379875,0.0000036758163,0.00016732902,0.00409474,0.00004578187,0.00021915775,0.88754046,0.025978534,0.08104476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018679377,0.000056670182,0.007261463,0.00048719058,0.000013365423,0.0008389087,0.014470172,0.00044755585,0.0005919648,0.42440775,0.5513935,0.000012814821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041750036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051165465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055381104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001139567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018824682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18526822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243750818","doi":"10.1163/1872-5309_ewic_ewiccom_0074c","title":"Divorce and Custody: Contemporary Practices: Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.03768096077021404,"score_gpt":0.3013751908439523,"score_spread":0.26369423007373827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243750818","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00177062,0.00026209364,0.000039045604,0.00017361538,0.000014958967,0.000014402784,0.9970284,0.000071878545,0.0006249385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061868243,0.00060697726,0.00021833145,0.00010781208,0.000012843351,0.00011170768,0.99047136,0.000043559186,0.0022405442],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984554,0.00012491918,0.00020197297,0.00027485096,0.0005395848,0.0004032518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99244326,0.0009284105,0.00085655786,0.00069565576,0.003971851,0.0011042499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011941673,0.0014839824,0.0015775182,0.0073546353,0.0024602378,0.0037430795,0.0042886985,0.00176957,0.017952459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00987095,0.0010341224,0.0017916278,0.023764115,0.00072632794,0.0010812454,0.002283357,0.0023948755,0.007272414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001476786,0.000049667793,0.031957675,0.00068845,0.00018877268,0.000074509364,0.00025044908,0.0007518773,0.000047531074,0.0008450053,0.9586227,0.006375638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004523685,0.000025108691,0.33208665,0.0018243878,0.00027360453,0.0001733273,0.0017286148,0.001986693,0.00037439808,0.0011859721,0.6597393,0.000149589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9835185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019352451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019352451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045547556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14041251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W424443728","doi":"","title":"Resisting Two-Year Limits on Welfare in British Columbia","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Social Policy / Revue canadienne de politique sociale","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020885868300943144,"score_gpt":0.2767667392507298,"score_spread":0.2558808709497867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W424443728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5367577,0.08344861,0.0005274682,0.16593644,0.0020808452,0.0001957971,0.004069994,0.00009072063,0.2068924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8782594,0.035614263,0.00051240256,0.026344651,0.00026111878,0.00023119064,0.0010994774,0.000050531726,0.05762699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906002,0.0011949197,0.0005198561,0.00039725026,0.0018777099,0.005409999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866415,0.0033613085,0.0007561509,0.00048925786,0.0056179347,0.0031337983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008012164,0.00032825893,0.0011614414,0.003189398,0.009578524,0.0075673405,0.0039706663,0.004826878,0.0057931705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0147383325,0.0004797342,0.00054608047,0.0055680657,0.0047753197,0.0019973314,0.004719032,0.005510858,0.000316287],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010666958,0.0004257556,0.069587626,0.002741305,0.000415327,0.0016396561,0.026786704,0.0051900456,0.0018268088,0.34091473,0.22074273,0.32866263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019663773,0.00016298515,0.37515682,0.0053891256,0.00037784752,0.00020488958,0.038359635,0.0012062737,0.00079677894,0.021469623,0.5562993,0.0003800912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99747664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119556606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.119556606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23592055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.867448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244731961","doi":"10.1353/cpp.2011.0019","title":"Estimating the Effects of Cigarette Taxes on Birth Outcomes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; The Renaissance; Politics; Slavic languages; Social science; Classics; Media studies; History; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Economic history; Art history; Law","score_opus":0.02807171501096364,"score_gpt":0.27252895860086485,"score_spread":0.2444572435899012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244731961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.912903,0.0055563515,0.009172584,0.006272103,0.00032616322,0.00067168433,0.053009696,0.00053009467,0.011558342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95359963,0.003484184,0.0052733957,0.00041075726,0.00012449612,0.00024966,0.019308982,0.0000831048,0.017465835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978527,0.001125896,0.00011713357,0.00031201288,0.00021258001,0.00037975426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738902,0.02080893,0.0016924026,0.0011239608,0.0011112588,0.0013731797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006957345,0.0008168373,0.0016120778,0.001939796,0.00084307685,0.001689758,0.0025188928,0.0017698347,0.023414481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02811658,0.0013903731,0.0033639832,0.002537763,0.00071508216,0.0009899253,0.0011619289,0.0034788605,0.0023353237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018813525,0.0005982382,0.86418766,0.00042971727,0.004098465,0.0004375392,0.00030505942,0.047053963,0.00028798118,0.0063328715,0.015906401,0.058480848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015055446,0.0017268894,0.79681766,0.0007224082,0.0076185,0.00023746213,0.0018066277,0.16375265,0.0015869028,0.009667862,0.014429877,0.00012754094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75516444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73438424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24483556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007815319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007999323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49255484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244739109","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14636850","title":"Review [untitled]","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Democracy; State (computer science); Political science; Art; Humanities; Theology; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04772907769980402,"score_gpt":0.33738898118583116,"score_spread":0.28965990348602716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244739109","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012623527,0.8680536,0.00056731194,0.0160571,0.05529958,0.0003170082,0.00577338,0.00033970695,0.05346612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015796965,0.8495077,0.00083155895,0.037751544,0.021608042,0.0005078753,0.005779114,0.00021580808,0.08221874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859434,0.00019403629,0.00020979045,0.00024479692,0.00062098686,0.00013601995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938552,0.0014171308,0.00089291745,0.0004092287,0.003010615,0.00041487746],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001260287,0.0012902073,0.0026047793,0.0057320646,0.0009897089,0.004717534,0.0035384428,0.0036988687,0.26837438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012935473,0.00070273073,0.0017302246,0.0081007155,0.0010005658,0.003588351,0.0026470504,0.0031887202,0.1658665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005852406,0.000011329641,0.000040637482,0.018325832,0.00006580137,0.000093761584,0.00003485917,0.00004575117,0.00019257866,0.0010294152,0.84107816,0.13902333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016279198,0.000013019733,0.00022511052,0.010467878,0.000063637606,0.00016121249,0.000026690284,0.000010018597,0.00006253019,0.00055720133,0.98838645,0.000009861938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006128326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00902088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7316256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024453285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065941997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89780176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245938744","doi":"10.3386/w27210","title":"Collateralized Marriage","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Collateralized debt obligation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.36944911245876805,"score_gpt":0.5288992137040535,"score_spread":0.1594501012452854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245938744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59151524,0.0011424518,0.28814146,0.002988251,0.0001356851,0.0002521493,0.0023651097,0.0002806933,0.11317901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633938,0.00047329578,0.009300871,0.00009402782,0.000058043992,0.00009271513,0.00038338787,0.000017291088,0.026186619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993293,0.00026854148,0.000034658166,0.00015066513,0.00011725154,0.000099591736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740285,0.00048831664,0.0011266916,0.00050620316,0.00017270359,0.00030319043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000977621,0.00040943222,0.000542513,0.00039926468,0.00081937364,0.001429631,0.0014044157,0.0012163502,0.0218176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048530125,0.00030073617,0.0006400238,0.0007324308,0.0014819878,0.0026981167,0.0013391109,0.0013318824,0.0012500242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011871315,0.0001917548,0.010513262,0.00005038313,0.000030352488,0.0006197629,0.00041248984,0.0932928,0.0005959639,0.8741431,0.0025993276,0.017432164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001573646,0.00042396155,0.009084234,0.0001014503,0.000052540097,0.0010151089,0.0003349208,0.42498407,0.0005790268,0.5413104,0.021895992,0.00006085013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063569495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059483587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0218176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016397538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013559684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07298714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246833319","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/kqfd7","title":"The Unintended Effect of Paternity Leave on Union Stability: Evidence from the Quebec Parental Insurance Program","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Work (physics); Unintended consequences; Population; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.04093799986842667,"score_gpt":0.3185664347639493,"score_spread":0.27762843489552264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246833319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96355826,0.008636373,0.00033134714,0.006708036,0.000096614,0.00018124543,0.0060744775,0.000020174097,0.014393522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993505,0.0019674697,0.00012233786,0.0011680142,0.00004136606,0.00006138442,0.000785996,0.000007881182,0.0023406611],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99273056,0.003911952,0.00022828476,0.00048690088,0.0014650793,0.0011771793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688955,0.015324969,0.0069285315,0.0017335061,0.0044570332,0.0026604277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058531174,0.00026883837,0.00056799146,0.0009386435,0.0020537954,0.0013204991,0.0018280126,0.0012388646,0.008309155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032317545,0.00018984861,0.00094205845,0.0018586285,0.0016217753,0.00042532306,0.0008183319,0.0012606556,0.00030430706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004449763,0.0010500415,0.90587085,0.00044139562,0.0011930377,0.00015138742,0.0013890526,0.000979187,0.00026659295,0.001175114,0.011188042,0.07184549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033296656,0.0004288418,0.9932232,0.00026495772,0.00058406976,0.00002786773,0.00077549793,0.0006306398,0.00013989682,0.00013856054,0.0034346613,0.000018803723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9666645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9762189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033335507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018543448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018359615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13454276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248608957","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.317701","title":"Economic and Social Status in Household Decision Making: Evidence from Extended Family Mobility","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Social mobility; Socioeconomic status; Demographic economics; Public economics; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Demography; Social science","score_opus":0.03579358190278777,"score_gpt":0.29432691531894234,"score_spread":0.2585333334161546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248608957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998912,0.00022917494,0.000033012377,0.000088605004,0.0000031512154,0.0000024699075,0.000053691034,3.596974e-7,0.00067763275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999338,0.00022056255,0.000037321875,0.000024886114,0.0000057926186,0.000007049344,0.00006485511,8.922094e-7,0.00030055785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878794,0.00073735736,0.000048890568,0.00012814859,0.00009702469,0.00020056509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814745,0.011352883,0.0037442942,0.0013986622,0.00053874863,0.0014908495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033399041,0.0002970273,0.0005092742,0.00092027674,0.001322176,0.0012795579,0.00080681365,0.0010020082,0.0066243606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014994514,0.00041148608,0.00039110353,0.0014037918,0.0021004735,0.0015001163,0.0017348686,0.00082848564,0.00036815682],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013328973,0.0010260582,0.9738086,0.00004534559,0.0002549623,0.00030340013,0.009966801,0.00033096052,0.00016934755,0.0009413368,0.00020892378,0.011611438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052885243,0.00025913992,0.9889655,0.000049679522,0.000076531374,0.00014877408,0.0082386155,0.00032578528,0.00007026069,0.0012152463,0.00058125745,0.000016316288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019011708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024007125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019011708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003987449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049226184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0378021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249792533","doi":"10.4095/301011","title":"Median Total Income of Individuals, 2000$ (by census division)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Division (mathematics); Geography; Demography; Demographic economics; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Mathematics; Economics; Arithmetic; Population","score_opus":0.025749678616652578,"score_gpt":0.3118715932206206,"score_spread":0.286121914603968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249792533","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07488255,0.00085068285,0.00034001443,0.0005582198,0.00013509628,0.000304644,0.8442984,0.0002366288,0.07839383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16757745,0.0034550892,0.000997223,0.00043697353,0.00007958061,0.00052597764,0.73718554,0.00007770533,0.08966442],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997105,0.000009387796,0.000022120277,0.000026248272,0.00014249103,0.0000891013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995757,0.000013672984,0.00004835457,0.000011150192,0.00027357865,0.00007749103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002061941,0.00033506218,0.00024037457,0.0016884208,0.00072171236,0.0005084237,0.00042055934,0.00013132788,0.019388894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010583431,0.000113064445,0.00016522985,0.0034567234,0.00010346851,0.0003779945,0.00045996992,0.0003906439,0.0070849736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010013665,0.000070165464,0.16777106,0.00018346774,0.000034612174,0.000094272014,0.00027194238,0.00035973347,0.0002160422,0.0015154332,0.790578,0.038805105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020590467,0.000028791192,0.7660275,0.00013106363,0.000019929006,0.00011142889,0.00086569926,0.0003547754,0.00019653529,0.00025818634,0.2319726,0.000012816761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7640757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8095912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7640757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002529275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057985913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47462738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249815019","doi":"10.5040/9781350220041","title":"Female Well-Being","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Zed Books Ltd","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; History; Sociology; Development economics; Economics","score_opus":0.016875174799699945,"score_gpt":0.2653833740052852,"score_spread":0.24850819920558528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249815019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044053245,0.047915857,0.00061777176,0.010489402,0.00072244776,0.00004900511,0.002401568,0.000070092225,0.8936807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31577465,0.06932489,0.0009273687,0.004368954,0.00051939697,0.00011794,0.0017307635,0.000113696646,0.6071223],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998229,0.00004768298,0.0000064254623,0.00002628384,0.000063203304,0.000033485398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998041,0.000060638453,0.000024457824,0.000014140409,0.000050740804,0.00004598951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035101888,0.00026670995,0.00021879897,0.0010280948,0.0008045891,0.0013334595,0.00015878346,0.00036485138,0.036735788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007678428,0.00007028067,0.00012457851,0.0015197442,0.00045421007,0.0014166968,0.00057988026,0.00050746603,0.005286226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037137655,0.000049716484,0.015342041,0.00043690318,0.000009062052,0.00026623058,0.024793796,0.00010773904,0.0005994028,0.08593045,0.39494422,0.47748318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.1536783e-7,0.000021079568,0.010430542,0.00020747841,0.0000019669287,0.00037591296,0.0041181813,0.000013819455,0.00010922954,0.0014438858,0.9832719,0.0000052990213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002516846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067617404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036735788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004848082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036510138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12289351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249952552","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_101215","title":"Social Yield","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Yield (engineering); Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.054516212015663375,"score_gpt":0.2952321713678314,"score_spread":0.24071595935216805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249952552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015958016,0.0005068918,0.0014319142,0.0016895467,0.00025479565,0.000019186553,0.00009498309,0.000042829834,0.99436414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07681132,0.0014842731,0.00089335104,0.00069270824,0.00042703995,0.0000666034,0.000205696,0.0001199559,0.919299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995703,0.00007420017,0.000012416661,0.00011012608,0.00016095891,0.0000719653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976104,0.000033176715,0.000013319101,0.00005444991,0.0000912395,0.000046735164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004627959,0.0006730539,0.00035732696,0.001017187,0.0029393632,0.0040712804,0.0006483946,0.00116152,0.13509414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015408223,0.00019431893,0.00030940582,0.00079991436,0.0032803612,0.0029714538,0.003508728,0.001965577,0.03417473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010141563,0.000016170201,0.00018536302,0.000030321788,0.000003470307,0.00004881395,0.00091497845,0.000101931044,0.00023397112,0.9219293,0.037643325,0.03888228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032013513,0.000013087616,0.0005890551,0.000051980485,0.0000029081386,0.000066965826,0.0007149523,0.00009461093,0.00021849838,0.16433291,0.83390737,0.000004480295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030667097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045007337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13509414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028977508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016279675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45193493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250424155","doi":"10.3138/cpp.36.1.107","title":"Home Cooking, Food Consumption, and Food Production among Retired Canadian Households","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Food away from home; Food consumption; Food processing; Calorie; Economics; Production (economics); Consumer Expenditure Survey; Agricultural economics; Environmental health; Food science; Medicine; Aggregate expenditure; Public economics; Biology","score_opus":0.028488615950597738,"score_gpt":0.25100370212004475,"score_spread":0.222515086169447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250424155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889876,0.0005678925,0.000055817072,0.00012431468,0.000004563142,0.000013118101,0.007398666,0.000008152325,0.0028398281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940817,0.0005042045,0.0001777765,0.0000339957,0.0000027075096,0.0000065044997,0.003235989,0.0000029410264,0.001954221],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976486,0.000012540294,0.000009921352,0.000034104018,0.00008019526,0.0000984336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948454,0.000037118618,0.00012591867,0.000033571763,0.00020056377,0.000118262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034212883,0.00024361323,0.00020168224,0.0016403837,0.001581488,0.00064723846,0.0006139837,0.00021807545,0.0032925287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012798127,0.0001668307,0.00047096424,0.0034609803,0.0003008199,0.00024553423,0.00038591734,0.00022211394,0.00021201308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082209874,0.000023822713,0.989785,0.00003029274,0.000047776946,0.000054525328,0.00066056394,0.00025862997,0.00020391002,0.0002142117,0.0011463187,0.0074927513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016100489,0.000006061849,0.9987275,0.000006746384,0.000009201526,0.000012872451,0.00038434917,0.00012151143,0.00003728197,0.0000138225505,0.00067496474,0.000004119795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9942416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99705267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010811777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010811777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008612575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078445315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250680083","doi":"10.2307/1515155","title":"How an Earnings Supplement Can Affect Union Formation among Low-Income Single Mothers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Earnings; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Welfare; Marital status; Economics; Welfare reform; Single mothers; Demography; Population; Psychology; Geography; Sociology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.01196285132157883,"score_gpt":0.2403952843843287,"score_spread":0.22843243306274985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250680083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995202,0.00004602817,0.000021887947,0.000045539156,0.0000030077433,0.000007759066,0.000039617924,0.000001327588,0.00031469637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987919,0.00010610668,0.00014993467,0.000033281067,0.0000013002805,0.000011268739,0.00003924117,8.373205e-7,0.0008662257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962604,0.00013262431,0.000010869183,0.00004353411,0.00007193254,0.00011496223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990932,0.00034821028,0.00017527671,0.000073826035,0.00013171813,0.00017772852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007429531,0.00015168622,0.00019605063,0.00021801869,0.0010701459,0.00048073923,0.0004368138,0.00026701653,0.0018471006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002892055,0.00011427037,0.0001614996,0.0001865163,0.00057318574,0.00012516971,0.0002530842,0.00024228366,0.00011378868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.033382475,0.012359521,0.72667044,0.00030563664,0.00030402,0.00095971586,0.009576541,0.0015058072,0.06124531,0.001204818,0.00209704,0.1503886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006516482,0.010161498,0.965456,0.000052941275,0.00023708447,0.0000927805,0.008216085,0.0012614448,0.009717848,0.00038686645,0.0037191408,0.00004648531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5560095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7555428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5560095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003567294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041095526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89321053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250995688","doi":"10.1787/9789264303560-7-en","title":"Policy vision and framework","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"OECD development co-operation peer reviews","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04700408883664628,"score_gpt":0.355683858391696,"score_spread":0.3086797695550497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250995688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013617092,0.0086284485,0.025941012,0.2681587,0.0027585505,0.0021614158,0.0025674303,0.0002777419,0.68814504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.112276986,0.024115926,0.14248483,0.17267933,0.0026984066,0.013317073,0.0045209285,0.0004804501,0.52742606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991231,0.0032998093,0.00040769688,0.0011037018,0.0026314294,0.0013264115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939757,0.0016480599,0.00031190462,0.00025035196,0.0027217,0.0010922804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01409216,0.0012512292,0.0011268514,0.0059118904,0.009329552,0.024234813,0.005835027,0.017712755,0.02249801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01311057,0.0007336487,0.0008153077,0.0059152762,0.012242347,0.0085698245,0.0055441353,0.012436299,0.006763643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027275876,0.000013230134,0.000029105644,0.00010176409,0.0000011318518,0.00004017981,0.00042036342,0.000344384,0.00001906777,0.9565545,0.038472306,0.0040012123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011088765,0.000010979736,0.00013929672,0.0012108105,0.0000048336947,0.00009558607,0.0020291624,0.00055551983,0.000071500326,0.2527612,0.74308467,0.000025334577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16515681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14390558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16515681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056476768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12683654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4097696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251169702","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3104061","title":"Evidence on the Economic Consequences of Marriage Equality and LGBT Human Rights","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04378760877335166,"score_gpt":0.3241261722646671,"score_spread":0.2803385634913155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251169702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72711277,0.016986435,0.0006928639,0.053471085,0.00031711895,0.00004370865,0.0014080553,0.000005436562,0.19996247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918452,0.0037890323,0.000062441635,0.001635,0.00018788302,0.0000169618,0.00016783203,0.000002707482,0.002292883],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673444,0.001662705,0.00013081373,0.00019888398,0.0006062684,0.00066691055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696601,0.020399464,0.0057684137,0.0010418306,0.001828156,0.0013020195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006208181,0.00020785972,0.00039330986,0.0019642052,0.0017888099,0.0021581047,0.0007905791,0.0016736193,0.030200358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030550642,0.00017517341,0.00031799532,0.0024884604,0.0042752395,0.0018451472,0.0024290276,0.0017196374,0.00069661264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011668818,0.00087172067,0.72793233,0.0006140365,0.000317598,0.0013064443,0.0061426167,0.0006014118,0.00030608446,0.14625192,0.009042906,0.105445996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000834898,0.00020579083,0.9229044,0.0011199655,0.0001656878,0.0005208219,0.018017458,0.00031127795,0.00039816188,0.029981,0.0262706,0.000021357708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015963204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022785174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030200358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015408194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016967028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10103029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251445268","doi":"10.3138/cpp.36.4.503","title":"Implications of the Introduction of the Goods and Services Tax for Families in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Almost ideal demand system; Welfare; Goods and services; Economics; Demographic economics; Public economics; Survey data collection; Engel curve; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Production (economics); Aggregate expenditure; Economy","score_opus":0.010255453732197422,"score_gpt":0.2462392602606427,"score_spread":0.23598380652844528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251445268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9287803,0.002580687,0.00027616727,0.032269638,0.00021377584,0.0000654188,0.004238219,0.00004017848,0.031535648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929274,0.0010653493,0.00020006367,0.0015707859,0.00001869058,0.000010696649,0.00044632598,0.000009972256,0.003750652],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947961,0.00052204245,0.00011181474,0.00021205499,0.0012476196,0.0031102616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99564844,0.000510617,0.00042318337,0.00011807085,0.0023680292,0.0009316994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002298793,0.00025008898,0.0004560352,0.0011846139,0.0062790057,0.0022062664,0.001380857,0.00083695876,0.0038885672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010375777,0.0001897923,0.0008911454,0.0029509233,0.0018334279,0.00059566245,0.0013722413,0.0012693064,0.00010578103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015459006,0.00033614325,0.721755,0.0003227501,0.00033644759,0.0027578217,0.010299293,0.020617453,0.0017530342,0.06688923,0.059592634,0.11379426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008437279,0.000098233795,0.9292026,0.00028385935,0.00016557133,0.00020323692,0.019716982,0.0046566715,0.00091503694,0.0025025108,0.042055577,0.00011540732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99871755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13912228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13912228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13022223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253814954","doi":"10.1017/9781108227407.005","title":"Importing Ideas","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Public economics; Law and economics; Economics; Accounting; Computer science","score_opus":0.025469464902254206,"score_gpt":0.22976132528572182,"score_spread":0.2042918603834676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253814954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00267611,0.010893826,0.0084946295,0.023893531,0.0022115768,0.000030852723,0.00007140126,0.00009652908,0.9516316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.302538,0.02317133,0.013697141,0.021535628,0.0033846563,0.00032932922,0.00025848788,0.0005753858,0.63451004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997771,0.0012275472,0.000051676856,0.000286061,0.00047161776,0.00019220196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980786,0.0010384913,0.00008234182,0.0003128995,0.00032902538,0.00015865809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025564,0.00090872473,0.0004903056,0.001992248,0.0068151574,0.010451717,0.001266851,0.0024704153,0.034122985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050082454,0.00028544417,0.00048447904,0.0017816299,0.016231949,0.010323133,0.005254645,0.0056629763,0.00617497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039380034,0.0000060659504,0.00004273238,0.000026222066,0.0000011233117,0.000032665117,0.0044427128,0.00003017163,0.000034438486,0.97652674,0.012451539,0.0064016134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032659407,0.0000071498703,0.000072809074,0.00020166906,0.000002210398,0.0000754271,0.0048857075,0.00010891375,0.00007048974,0.28488907,0.70967925,0.000004046181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050766375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007018023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034122985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007612462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034032562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11415273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253939816","doi":"10.24124/2003/bpgub273","title":"The Prince George Homebuilders Program: Was the intent fulfilled?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Art; Art history","score_opus":0.01729414364086411,"score_gpt":0.30340128302307884,"score_spread":0.2861071393822147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253939816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8213878,0.0018717173,0.00034334723,0.12081533,0.0003616016,0.00006224355,0.00017778134,0.000018051718,0.054962132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846917,0.0013319643,0.00023768516,0.0027621584,0.00007674872,0.00005924045,0.00006261874,0.000011460718,0.010766534],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982374,0.00088870997,0.000035102228,0.000053009302,0.00027937468,0.0005064359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662507,0.0008868524,0.00044521838,0.000119496704,0.0005614155,0.0013620221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036667595,0.00015316493,0.00024940082,0.00039470353,0.0022555357,0.0019794877,0.00049318594,0.0012302124,0.005494215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010182289,0.000163528,0.00015766612,0.00044018016,0.0017830026,0.0014741956,0.0015388539,0.0027387335,0.0006681249],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006844065,0.0012907247,0.36438888,0.0004970744,0.00007068444,0.0014159165,0.16976555,0.00013424439,0.00083446706,0.021490267,0.07767181,0.36175597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010454523,0.0005418837,0.43862277,0.0015207347,0.00009227113,0.00059854717,0.47506228,0.0002744956,0.0007217406,0.0072030965,0.075197406,0.000060177776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0289952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09488813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9710048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019586475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008414771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05765283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254089436","doi":"10.1787/tax_wages-2010-10-en","title":"Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Taxing wages","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social security; Payroll; Cash; Public economics; Government (linguistics); Economics; Cash transfers; Business; Labour economics; Finance; Accounting; Market economy","score_opus":0.032050018115367306,"score_gpt":0.24004510364364737,"score_spread":0.20799508552828005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254089436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009975493,0.002957983,0.00047526034,0.0018881811,0.00058258657,0.000048571696,0.023946816,0.00050115795,0.96860194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018397439,0.0013904284,0.0004698896,0.0002973737,0.000022542292,0.0000134037155,0.005105981,0.00013680241,0.9907238],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936634,0.000021333813,0.00001923185,0.0001398682,0.00036023822,0.000093052695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909925,0.000062652914,0.00002713786,0.00006170099,0.0006442833,0.00010496673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026235761,0.0007217223,0.0005861402,0.0016492703,0.0041979062,0.0038915514,0.0011049985,0.0011039112,0.54195297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011255195,0.00041694954,0.0003508466,0.004411361,0.00050438306,0.0015178625,0.0010886021,0.0011318646,0.27053407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003513023,0.000019859694,0.00072968204,0.00016905324,0.000005645473,0.00013585726,0.00023889991,0.000095392636,0.0002670843,0.016230319,0.88095325,0.101119794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016581841,0.0000020890384,0.00059370534,0.000033057902,9.67438e-7,0.000025924342,0.000075072545,0.000021297506,0.000053561893,0.00037544128,0.99881375,0.000003492431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6992831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88228196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54195297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01029621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016144115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254217835","doi":"10.4095/301010","title":"Median Total Income of Individuals, 2000$ (by census subdivision)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subdivision; Census; Geography; Statistics; Demography; Mathematics; Sociology; Archaeology; Population","score_opus":0.026290584135476455,"score_gpt":0.31157368875905517,"score_spread":0.2852831046235787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254217835","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099478975,0.0007459614,0.00035716093,0.0005485748,0.00010885264,0.0002815531,0.8223952,0.00022958466,0.07585418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20355903,0.002996023,0.0009479302,0.00035892957,0.0000660057,0.00042536043,0.705585,0.00007181576,0.085989855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997321,0.000008830174,0.000019072795,0.000024305025,0.00012742064,0.00008827619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996045,0.000012870468,0.000043464184,0.000010950122,0.0002509695,0.00007721677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019804234,0.0003100401,0.00023118946,0.0015143033,0.000728403,0.00048244442,0.0004228784,0.00012597219,0.017553251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010023018,0.00010601005,0.00015335198,0.0030786009,0.000102666134,0.000354769,0.00047567015,0.0003563508,0.0060727196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011685145,0.00007721995,0.23171264,0.00018244168,0.000036855938,0.00011645618,0.0003779265,0.0004291094,0.00026554297,0.0018465783,0.72229147,0.04254699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017658493,0.000026990516,0.8062355,0.00010709023,0.000018277959,0.00010755634,0.0009878183,0.00034994757,0.00019808466,0.000240165,0.19169915,0.000011681516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8014673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8458583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8014673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002455336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005952127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39940375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254786956","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2617691","title":"Work and Female Health Autonomy: Evidence from the Demographic and Health Surveys","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Family planning; Demographic economics; Fertility; Work (physics); Psychology; Population; Medicine; Economics; Environmental health; Political science; Research methodology","score_opus":0.059276001039293674,"score_gpt":0.32619895035023844,"score_spread":0.26692294931094473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254786956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99143326,0.0014518156,0.00009428211,0.0012869373,0.0000208631,0.000006649051,0.00061786367,0.0000011348843,0.0050870166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988839,0.0004680042,0.000016864042,0.00013674115,0.000023710098,0.000004368286,0.0001728275,0.000001231791,0.00029238622],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746585,0.001425238,0.00013931096,0.00021529113,0.0003249857,0.00042928068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978592,0.010869593,0.006663947,0.0010120295,0.0010746053,0.0017878166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003435099,0.00014857219,0.00027686337,0.0011924948,0.00079067284,0.0009761643,0.00042475967,0.00057771034,0.0041591497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017796995,0.00021233837,0.00032724405,0.0015389696,0.0012687813,0.0010410243,0.0013209204,0.00070187234,0.0002786134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008304947,0.000044099623,0.9938651,0.000019919424,0.000038781734,0.00003204961,0.001162949,0.000020438021,0.000025441226,0.00021989607,0.00023058277,0.004257663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000449241,0.000036117275,0.9958436,0.00003081421,0.000013265494,0.00003826382,0.0029713355,0.000028223609,0.000019192352,0.000120427205,0.0008914692,0.0000029437172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014503144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02239867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014503144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033695315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005523618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028837442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255866560","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_103808","title":"Sexual Economics Theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Psychology; Positive economics","score_opus":0.024008600848062677,"score_gpt":0.24930307343168423,"score_spread":0.22529447258362156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255866560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001451899,0.011725285,0.0042185127,0.0063710553,0.00048299483,0.000020500112,0.000067856665,0.000022121603,0.97563976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.104139365,0.020446297,0.0035809397,0.00450762,0.0009374523,0.00011593871,0.00016989328,0.000088697256,0.8660138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997142,0.000115603136,0.0000054174006,0.000042759908,0.000087146305,0.000034983794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983907,0.00007841496,0.0000071497484,0.000022116521,0.000035972887,0.000017239743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004979021,0.0004540261,0.00028617718,0.0008055795,0.0014165882,0.002582772,0.0005663516,0.0014977369,0.03588015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010852328,0.00017388868,0.00021523469,0.0008558725,0.0034616021,0.002150594,0.00086982024,0.002129582,0.005997188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030003926,0.000013313381,0.00007903131,0.000018643537,0.0000015486394,0.000016402122,0.00020582005,0.000117699274,0.000031437263,0.94661576,0.03301262,0.019884827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033814797,0.000005822349,0.00024021497,0.00012678446,0.0000019684496,0.00006389774,0.00027032022,0.00022496252,0.00006579411,0.5692134,0.42977953,0.0000038750227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041425773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054986225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03588015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024186315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001522858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12003106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256026881","doi":"10.3138/cpp.35.1.21","title":"Fiscal Retrenchment and Social Assistance in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Social assistance; Population; Exploit; Chose; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Public administration; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.016956484298916438,"score_gpt":0.25744356169597504,"score_spread":0.2404870773970586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256026881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8987253,0.0046089254,0.00022522308,0.023236325,0.00014893181,0.00007005468,0.0022872225,0.000048961447,0.070649065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98357093,0.0017131978,0.00014673173,0.0012088359,0.000028504961,0.000014232941,0.00058918475,0.000012789439,0.012715661],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950171,0.00017718313,0.000072730094,0.00016962165,0.0010329152,0.0035304667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949786,0.0003469843,0.000697719,0.00009188217,0.001702287,0.002182499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014495427,0.00024791458,0.0004874376,0.0023464942,0.009802446,0.0035444684,0.0016007463,0.0009328515,0.005541946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061616553,0.00023921358,0.00043315496,0.005433768,0.0024026334,0.0006758425,0.0021325874,0.0016508453,0.00022219635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050875323,0.00023709671,0.6759184,0.00030252684,0.00017824215,0.001490179,0.022386387,0.005198689,0.0007857988,0.119206555,0.06043345,0.11335402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059466598,0.00005364526,0.8472957,0.00024928423,0.000065098735,0.00016011958,0.0190305,0.0017369624,0.00028058427,0.0027389666,0.12824914,0.00008059069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99936396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1642056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1642056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2813446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.969403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280565369","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197601457.003.0006","title":"The Politics of Early Years and Family Policy Investments in North America","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Welfare state; Political economy; Politics; Ideology; Exceptionalism; Democracy; Public administration; State (computer science); Economics; Law","score_opus":0.02348697562507796,"score_gpt":0.26867940961455355,"score_spread":0.2451924339894756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280565369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08237286,0.02720178,0.00024334616,0.034241233,0.00043340994,0.000009534104,0.00010747884,0.000022700026,0.85536766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7535178,0.01689611,0.00029555082,0.0049993256,0.00023614231,0.000026021062,0.000073405055,0.000024380779,0.22393131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994267,0.00017568188,0.0000046325667,0.000038671657,0.0001392126,0.00021512188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954224,0.000145675,0.000027709466,0.00001154227,0.00010742671,0.00016533563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006594153,0.00011972466,0.00010932141,0.0007184809,0.0064032055,0.0033250342,0.00030180294,0.00057298166,0.004880123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063948147,0.000089171015,0.00006290714,0.0013990699,0.0032005294,0.0008604045,0.0010186465,0.0014165808,0.00022778926],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029958692,0.000048091308,0.0036577685,0.000050523027,0.0000052262017,0.0001668995,0.03617598,0.00028696837,0.00028858555,0.78331655,0.100654006,0.07531958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027170465,0.0000068762224,0.01705386,0.00017454676,0.0000031160364,0.000033003194,0.0157317,0.00010585858,0.00013658378,0.012427986,0.95431465,0.000009013403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5963028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8116014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4036972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02742745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014629666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8121493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284678622","doi":"10.5070/t35156974","title":"Review of Gendered Lives: Global Issues, edited by Nadine T. Fernandez and Katie Nelson","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teaching and Learning Anthropology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Criminology; Media studies; History","score_opus":0.019165716939550295,"score_gpt":0.33505454278463787,"score_spread":0.3158888258450876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284678622","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003353595,0.9927313,0.000039376202,0.003549742,0.0030882086,0.0000018268645,0.00002320625,0.0000030139213,0.0005298902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00041050115,0.9945648,0.00007780525,0.0014230884,0.0023714218,0.0000057334028,0.0000367239,0.000005461213,0.0011045417],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911493,0.00030094787,0.000110469955,0.000112744325,0.00029599207,0.000064873784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958402,0.0020446302,0.0003292077,0.00008770356,0.0013916267,0.00030665722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025627315,0.0014268156,0.0025596179,0.0057101506,0.0009389583,0.0034565248,0.0014329711,0.0021151146,0.00802552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051867547,0.0007223822,0.00067065307,0.009690531,0.0019303684,0.0041514607,0.0021653755,0.0030499352,0.0033816274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000764433,0.000024312461,0.0002700246,0.011018538,0.000071133356,0.000113339986,0.00059232395,0.000127305,0.00031245145,0.004976353,0.6705951,0.31182262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007614374,0.000021210002,0.0011724532,0.009135058,0.000032600456,0.0003405286,0.00048012432,0.000019432475,0.00005440978,0.0015105542,0.987211,0.000015005573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00881745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02517419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00881745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021540802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056713168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026848078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285362896","doi":"10.1162/rest_a_01110","title":"Asymmetric Demand Response When Prices Increase and Decrease: The Case of Child Health Care","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economics and Statistics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Subsidy; Welfare; Demand management; Proposition; Microeconomics; Public economics; Macroeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.0173530253460495,"score_gpt":0.29585107736539445,"score_spread":0.27849805201934497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285362896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9767975,0.0005884368,0.0049716807,0.0040488746,0.00007815921,0.00004762664,0.00024101241,0.000016767704,0.0132099055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990901,0.00010364982,0.00024960827,0.00015998316,0.000028178823,0.0000104880055,0.000031350395,0.000002600518,0.00032411134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794084,0.0011100894,0.000065352484,0.00023980801,0.00021653736,0.00042740963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987212,0.009007596,0.0016532867,0.0006587022,0.0010557704,0.00041265335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036428685,0.00022235615,0.00071809546,0.0005755114,0.0005243144,0.0010947426,0.00067851087,0.0014610327,0.006360607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0147794,0.00021238536,0.00082097074,0.0006155901,0.0014627151,0.0015614347,0.0010142423,0.0014891451,0.00044134865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009091305,0.0025217235,0.38794976,0.0019593397,0.0010055194,0.011506331,0.0070866277,0.042927407,0.03050612,0.40341157,0.018444605,0.08358965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013506794,0.0018576954,0.4325655,0.00025086527,0.0009554584,0.002449545,0.0344018,0.21371639,0.010739462,0.28534818,0.015976958,0.00038749722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007418384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034223301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007418384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016725925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062182115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021278381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286438164","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2021-079","title":"Net Child Care Costs in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Factoring; Cash flow; Distribution (mathematics); Business; Child care; Public economics; Net income; Cash; Economics; Demographic economics; Finance; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.011490204440546123,"score_gpt":0.23738407350180152,"score_spread":0.2258938690612554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286438164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69051963,0.024450151,0.00072477607,0.029727332,0.0005031118,0.00017693557,0.07264413,0.00018063036,0.18107331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95641303,0.011976421,0.001175967,0.0014669319,0.000056767058,0.000064841945,0.009777495,0.000046333116,0.019022157],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980761,0.00013332062,0.000062184234,0.0001115429,0.00094383396,0.00067299715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99606544,0.00022326245,0.0003042137,0.00006361917,0.0024169416,0.00092649745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074861594,0.0003438293,0.00041975814,0.0028773888,0.003462298,0.0022385889,0.0012452553,0.00036850094,0.007242124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004950726,0.00022965162,0.0005738567,0.006596771,0.0005678734,0.0006003315,0.0009627192,0.0009366651,0.00028423572],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002487399,0.00012883687,0.5658812,0.0007442138,0.00034655078,0.000692648,0.0028526862,0.0039111,0.00030100445,0.05411896,0.2222086,0.14856553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045944224,0.00003545348,0.8871765,0.00057240354,0.00011830163,0.0002438715,0.0033876146,0.0021840099,0.00018224712,0.0020485641,0.103935264,0.000069888614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99897075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14224435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14224435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14338878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99487495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286611311","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2022.102264","title":"Italy’s demographic trap: Voting for childcare subsidies and fertility outcomes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Voting; Trap (plumbing); Fertility; Economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Demography; Population; Geography; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.027102553967259743,"score_gpt":0.27131014297990774,"score_spread":0.244207589012648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286611311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97752666,0.0008154787,0.00009054913,0.008214687,0.00006639351,0.0000066745065,0.0008368123,0.000009953393,0.012432757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980046,0.00010340646,0.000011989943,0.00020660307,0.00006413016,0.0000028006198,0.00032755962,0.00000362072,0.0012752522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934703,0.00021842089,0.000022835682,0.0000729881,0.00005759502,0.0002811899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684393,0.0007496698,0.0013268833,0.00016789419,0.00012533879,0.0007862415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001385094,0.00012901265,0.00028949574,0.0008245285,0.0005061631,0.0012359138,0.00040417508,0.0011918793,0.011538332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047827335,0.0001270021,0.0004040905,0.000907346,0.0007094753,0.00047981238,0.0011280563,0.0011871256,0.00096027966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036157784,0.00015028083,0.9854005,0.000019073801,0.000059641145,0.00012570595,0.00062822504,0.00016896252,0.00009335874,0.0016924645,0.00420293,0.0070972475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012982581,0.000044186574,0.996637,0.00001372372,0.000021153268,0.00004718994,0.00085075863,0.00014833751,0.000026549962,0.00025409728,0.0019392791,0.000004596555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019287081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028007753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019287081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005687447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005195393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03859955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287103774","doi":"","title":"Welfare versus Work under a Negative Income Tax: Evidence from the Gary, Seattle, Denver and Manitoba Income Maintenance Experiments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Work (physics); Economics; Income tax; Demographic economics; Public economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06671482043979567,"score_gpt":0.3460806363652107,"score_spread":0.27936581592541504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287103774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884626,0.0005052011,0.0004403701,0.0013073065,0.000044949284,0.00007189084,0.00046133538,0.000028054497,0.008678356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98871094,0.00063682767,0.0006642969,0.0010274163,0.00003000286,0.00028725129,0.0007649675,0.00002907198,0.00784919],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967644,0.0021314744,0.00007457464,0.00041105764,0.00036165275,0.0002567517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767617,0.010789444,0.0053828945,0.0042261905,0.0013541548,0.0014855923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007836984,0.00042486007,0.0007617935,0.00051761477,0.0018420832,0.0012659566,0.001512018,0.0011246648,0.008487081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013292481,0.0003023426,0.0003398089,0.00083977793,0.0037018799,0.000669435,0.0012223276,0.0017079267,0.00094452366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11374404,0.051861726,0.4902236,0.0015970845,0.0028867358,0.0009924873,0.017976284,0.0050634183,0.027346415,0.052034266,0.055164207,0.18110964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053535043,0.012910359,0.9134104,0.0004339493,0.0010540448,0.00016650412,0.008412816,0.0031708602,0.00578326,0.011118471,0.038041063,0.00014470489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09578542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15886763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90421456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030891146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022379723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19045573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287128507","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v14i1.72691","title":"Social Policy Trends: Home Alone","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.05523058924022788,"score_gpt":0.3555449252892272,"score_spread":0.3003143360489993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287128507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3118588,0.0550921,0.0008327864,0.21202174,0.0073052095,0.00017419075,0.1641332,0.0006622032,0.24791974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7486689,0.059738517,0.0007810337,0.045205384,0.002724615,0.00016453656,0.074302435,0.00021265562,0.06820201],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986809,0.000051220344,0.000058055535,0.00010609924,0.00050601194,0.000597737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967661,0.00015155299,0.00040368096,0.00006273575,0.0014876256,0.0011283108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007103331,0.00027029586,0.00034353638,0.0030184889,0.002392705,0.0025321287,0.0008667603,0.0011867107,0.019389398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027726118,0.00018041034,0.0005637944,0.006453552,0.0008540908,0.0024286867,0.0013726988,0.0027438174,0.0021382223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017506622,0.00016285363,0.18364923,0.001017222,0.00008912995,0.0004488483,0.0054214215,0.0002475572,0.00029857384,0.0221807,0.61658853,0.16972092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001650427,0.000054485987,0.43987304,0.00083452696,0.000039757175,0.00031248605,0.01143746,0.000168288,0.00021311548,0.0012154419,0.5457961,0.00003881887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90166754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9338643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90166754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014325471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02300096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1978231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288450873","doi":"10.7758/rsf.2022.8.5.04","title":"Families’ Job Characteristics and Economic Self-Sufficiency: Differences by Income, Race-Ethnicity, and Nativity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"W.K. Kellogg Foundation; Spencer Foundation","keywords":"Receipt; Immigration; Demographic economics; Ethnic group; Wage; Quarter (Canadian coin); Working poor; Income Support; Labour economics; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Population; Race (biology); Family income; Pension; Inequality; Economics; Poverty; Economic growth; Political science; Geography; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.018294273956768838,"score_gpt":0.2854251080986874,"score_spread":0.2671308341419185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288450873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991147,0.00010910142,0.000021679421,0.00013633516,0.0000067029637,0.0000021344586,0.000097399505,0.0000010701641,0.0005108872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994072,0.00008653033,0.00002352377,0.000022377693,0.00000558059,0.0000043719206,0.000089024914,0.00000182319,0.00035952273],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995999,0.00015757722,0.00002747036,0.000045380722,0.00006425135,0.000105426836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696594,0.00094784435,0.0008584458,0.00013384472,0.00021743776,0.00087642675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010112701,0.00021832928,0.00028524638,0.0007479064,0.0008952419,0.0008471205,0.0006267695,0.00039069713,0.0046082726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054382845,0.00028438098,0.0005761741,0.0006962672,0.00050151953,0.00083277153,0.0008943293,0.00077508995,0.0004316422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012343461,0.00015924618,0.99598444,0.0000038598173,0.000050237893,0.00009309882,0.00076301466,0.00003585974,0.00009608249,0.00007669874,0.00028783391,0.0023263288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033034355,0.00006419766,0.99675024,0.000007873044,0.0000134411575,0.00008831996,0.0026996208,0.00013207411,0.000022796292,0.00007483861,0.00013875862,0.000004537388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016805137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024120515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016805137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026397218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004770597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033414662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289822368","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4162092","title":"The Effect of Childcare Access on Women's Careers and Firm Performance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Human capital; Subsidy; Productivity; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Government (linguistics); Childbirth; Economics; Maternity leave; Business; Economic growth; Accounting","score_opus":0.005488397907534238,"score_gpt":0.2514750123275782,"score_spread":0.24598661442004394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289822368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99625826,0.00051794504,0.000021304124,0.0005404402,0.000012260139,0.000003077295,0.00021663826,0.0000022920349,0.0024277898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985753,0.00012185042,0.000009181858,0.000031675856,0.000012139441,0.0000016595709,0.0000665852,0.0000014317698,0.001180216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873596,0.0004034024,0.000045253288,0.000083806706,0.00008427734,0.0006473138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847888,0.006730659,0.0027427638,0.00027984433,0.00035134723,0.005106644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014343173,0.00019691786,0.0003602547,0.0010081842,0.0011131337,0.0020801628,0.00063293445,0.0011393358,0.016509539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008635063,0.00017666376,0.00059803546,0.0012563505,0.0009051373,0.000835986,0.0017471445,0.0011423494,0.00083454105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007285988,0.0003765373,0.99026346,0.000018396177,0.00008622916,0.00024042581,0.00063253695,0.00016947427,0.00023263344,0.0006121779,0.0003157602,0.0063237776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015595288,0.00025270006,0.99609166,0.000023463625,0.000037300033,0.000053625703,0.0025717777,0.0001284696,0.00008946831,0.000200631,0.00052951835,0.0000057766765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028865507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054725967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028865507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010660345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016509482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05739498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292198337","doi":"10.1111/cars.12394","title":"Mine, yours, ours, or no one's? Homeownership arrangements among cohabiting and married couples","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Economic rent; Residence; Welfare economics; Inequality; Economics; Demographic economics; Sociology; Humanities; Labour economics; Political science; Market economy; Art","score_opus":0.06862169091884845,"score_gpt":0.28317388362330004,"score_spread":0.21455219270445158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292198337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938012,0.0024390805,0.000039112845,0.0007934414,0.000015665511,0.00000723279,0.00014262923,0.0000012538069,0.0027604345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981585,0.0011663211,0.000015044892,0.00008895236,0.000004696331,0.0000022223471,0.000036115092,7.695337e-7,0.0005274039],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948454,0.00014761646,0.00002295324,0.00006485491,0.000101807535,0.00017822714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993523,0.00013542292,0.00017480546,0.000022106553,0.00010507534,0.00021035592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067905325,0.00009026576,0.00022206399,0.00095730583,0.0025014302,0.001150167,0.00039160307,0.00029297956,0.0031521884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020936052,0.000116765135,0.00016695577,0.0019171587,0.0014001749,0.00079303014,0.00088374654,0.0004192772,0.00012857349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062161576,0.000039591057,0.8865767,0.00006849175,0.000042184554,0.00040541147,0.07043206,0.00004904908,0.00016251726,0.001609974,0.0017860862,0.038765687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003369733,0.000035441648,0.85912275,0.00012814619,0.000015602543,0.00027632786,0.13670217,0.000094528994,0.00004078647,0.00033932648,0.0032288106,0.000012712293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67500114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81555754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67500114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028143174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020906308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65382564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294266979","doi":"10.1080/02692171.2022.2117283","title":"Gender roles and safety of women at home in the COVID-19 era: evidence from 101 countries","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Applied Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Demographic economics; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Production (economics); Business; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Economic growth; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.029106749434844505,"score_gpt":0.29411951928929736,"score_spread":0.2650127698544529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294266979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93875736,0.03990588,0.00026579568,0.004107955,0.00015569155,0.000026511862,0.0008684706,0.0000021230524,0.015910154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97865295,0.019731862,0.00007546477,0.0007308001,0.000053101314,0.000018038627,0.0002107893,0.0000032849875,0.00052367296],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980648,0.0011065573,0.000083431354,0.0001924987,0.00023032115,0.00032238849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99401927,0.0028806392,0.0020436125,0.0002280931,0.0004623566,0.00036600872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034233856,0.00030192785,0.00043194534,0.0010801866,0.0010041713,0.001333784,0.0004548194,0.0005865881,0.0032059816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068177013,0.00026391633,0.0004972244,0.0024011026,0.002661367,0.0018356108,0.0020676926,0.00079743285,0.00023037885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045717324,0.0001548097,0.8477682,0.002133327,0.0004712952,0.0007812199,0.042396452,0.00035552267,0.0001753197,0.009974613,0.0063065696,0.08902544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035187102,0.00034135958,0.83437073,0.0040430264,0.00020328884,0.00046616653,0.12305859,0.00011803544,0.00020965813,0.0015473375,0.035569064,0.000037580958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026276868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029890876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026276868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092219905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010606085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052247822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297103739","doi":"10.3386/w30492","title":"Labor Supply and Occupational Choice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Business; Labour economics; Economics","score_opus":0.3118105417213657,"score_gpt":0.5298495659284156,"score_spread":0.2180390242070499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297103739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9723537,0.0009037227,0.004311547,0.0012804508,0.000024986466,0.000018352057,0.0027762637,0.00004206464,0.018288933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958348,0.00018653406,0.00039721286,0.00005453056,0.000030462294,0.000013133908,0.0007478382,0.0000057681304,0.0027295824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935347,0.00021079114,0.000043284483,0.00012943427,0.00016317781,0.00009984653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990186,0.005456308,0.0026628615,0.0005822706,0.0005062253,0.0006063836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011400497,0.00012861394,0.00038568838,0.0011491698,0.0004737328,0.0010401832,0.0003046197,0.00043780162,0.013959399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009854275,0.00016924817,0.00024555298,0.0021643538,0.00051116117,0.0005739163,0.0006361648,0.00040416926,0.0010540129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017557564,0.0001470679,0.9380651,0.00008184008,0.00016429985,0.0001583633,0.0009035881,0.011144637,0.00076764525,0.02190337,0.004348513,0.022140054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001796589,0.000060358416,0.95961356,0.000037422033,0.000019478817,0.00017611907,0.0007194637,0.009560264,0.00020596042,0.022356639,0.007211604,0.00002116665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008053839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00829521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013959399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076945353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043395383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04669887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297997379","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14636850.v2","title":"Review [untitled]","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Democracy; State (computer science); Political science; Art; Humanities; Theology; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.050755687908216336,"score_gpt":0.3456488744259415,"score_spread":0.29489318651772517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297997379","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012627187,0.8683284,0.0005654155,0.016035736,0.055317007,0.0003163688,0.005733498,0.00033810237,0.053239208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015865728,0.84923023,0.00083112717,0.037913233,0.021672416,0.0005095949,0.0057483735,0.00021524109,0.082293175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985946,0.00019357186,0.00020979688,0.00024473463,0.0006211271,0.00013613327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938638,0.0014131073,0.00089390256,0.0004083874,0.0030055735,0.00041524525],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012597668,0.0012931562,0.0026058448,0.0057376195,0.0009924471,0.0047268434,0.0035505937,0.0037054373,0.26768455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012924372,0.0007044537,0.0017317234,0.008093221,0.0010011446,0.003585912,0.0026476132,0.0031944455,0.16544303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058951093,0.000011363266,0.000040713334,0.018317897,0.00006592923,0.000094259565,0.00003475528,0.000045905068,0.00019275566,0.0010255376,0.84103835,0.1390736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001643799,0.000013098024,0.00022611045,0.010496428,0.00006386985,0.00016194221,0.00002672703,0.000010074019,0.00006277837,0.0005577977,0.9883549,0.0000099163035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00611563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009038758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7323154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00245242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006589329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89549404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298218240","doi":"10.17615/wqcf-mx40","title":"Cross-National Comparisons of Time Trends in Overweight Inequality by Socioeconomic Status Among Women Using Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys From 37 Developing Countries, 1989–2007","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UNC Libraries","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; National Institutes of Health; University of California, San Francisco; University of Toronto","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Overweight; Cross-sectional study; Inequality; Demography; Geography; Environmental health; Medicine; Obesity; Statistics; Sociology; Mathematics; Population","score_opus":0.052452680073613846,"score_gpt":0.3138880500084878,"score_spread":0.26143536993487393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298218240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99622154,0.0016916328,0.00025514164,0.000023192226,0.000010699158,0.000020693304,0.0015209421,0.0000055971514,0.00025052455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996732,0.0005596803,0.0002861536,0.00003132255,0.0000070177643,0.000040136605,0.0022243562,0.000002906643,0.000116422],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873275,0.00050829333,0.00022821178,0.00029150673,0.0001383694,0.00010089857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99692196,0.0007892579,0.0012757763,0.0004883615,0.0004225621,0.0001019812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003182748,0.00034365317,0.00062635593,0.0011692953,0.00034573523,0.00056964287,0.00036424093,0.00027060503,0.00051361247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045269206,0.00043338028,0.001593598,0.0021457623,0.00023627208,0.00034883697,0.0006759952,0.0004114798,0.000105339335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002654597,0.000025913965,0.9939791,0.00007913528,0.003037517,0.00002838099,0.00017047786,0.000112479705,0.00015884313,0.000020708625,0.00013955806,0.0019823501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017589256,0.00008377603,0.99855906,0.000018363058,0.00074708334,0.000042706793,0.0001276789,0.00011134609,0.00007730148,0.000007060448,0.00020457894,0.0000033769759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021632947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030993499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021632947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005157635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036095016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04301405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298331687","doi":"10.46692/9781847425256.012","title":"Gender inequality in poverty in affluent nations: the role of single motherhood and the state","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Inequality; Gender inequality; State (computer science); Single mothers; Sociology; Political science; Development economics; Demographic economics; Gender studies; Economics; Economic growth; Psychology; Mathematics; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.022494458327270078,"score_gpt":0.2753494019806463,"score_spread":0.2528549436533762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298331687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7506945,0.042567533,0.0012899281,0.023637906,0.00030216062,0.000043027507,0.00066388224,0.000011733241,0.18078934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98835886,0.008526504,0.0002861258,0.00047622353,0.00018040068,0.000030673746,0.0000745312,0.0000033033093,0.002063353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994715,0.00029317432,0.000010385014,0.00003641909,0.000054979806,0.00013365019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903846,0.00061501056,0.00016632267,0.000018367162,0.000051346546,0.000110445166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075939845,0.00019528123,0.00023668648,0.0007172508,0.0014672742,0.0020886608,0.0002683298,0.00044760335,0.009323287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013491053,0.00010063259,0.00022809896,0.0014213943,0.0028840525,0.0013532329,0.0015466264,0.00058383186,0.00013733369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008613798,0.00012942513,0.25744593,0.00055922085,0.000055773246,0.0007964866,0.07477947,0.001133845,0.00019195737,0.561569,0.017618088,0.08563467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013382389,0.00022823871,0.55581367,0.0034004387,0.00006298908,0.00086573977,0.15434898,0.0014671037,0.00017269421,0.15645014,0.1271303,0.000046268615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069140624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008833826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009323287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000833913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067279505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03118956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298358275","doi":"10.2307/25149537","title":"Public Pensions: Gender and Civic Service in the States, 1850-1937","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public service; Service (business); Business; Public administration; Political science; Demographic economics; Gender studies; Sociology; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.04174751785137953,"score_gpt":0.2639368407228002,"score_spread":0.22218932287142068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298358275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910362,0.00051496836,0.00003971331,0.00082733907,0.000024991492,0.000006340111,0.00088768016,0.0000042318347,0.006658579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99300635,0.00019089578,0.00003252644,0.00006425365,0.000015478854,0.000006333829,0.000341453,0.000001817225,0.006340964],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996101,0.000050576185,0.000013449125,0.000035223922,0.000036348287,0.0002542346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949753,0.00007402219,0.00014288521,0.000019691144,0.00011319331,0.00015272757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005401372,0.00011969053,0.00022666463,0.0010275098,0.0025387527,0.0010448332,0.00046921353,0.000516304,0.0036839042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011814006,0.00014146489,0.00021763219,0.0016268612,0.0009555935,0.00085189467,0.0011594798,0.0009915408,0.00036101192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002856421,0.00022619392,0.89330876,0.000084475505,0.00004105069,0.00029065652,0.04349221,0.0003302767,0.0004311278,0.016942369,0.008532502,0.036034808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046200694,0.000068815956,0.9460826,0.000048799684,0.00001268117,0.00006144415,0.020940332,0.00012504138,0.00022979248,0.00050623,0.031911537,0.000008079359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21507098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5514362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21507098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003110167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019753426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42763823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300131663","doi":"","title":"Do Higher Childcare Subsidies Improve Parental Well-being? Evidence from Québec's Family Policies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Business; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.030360070124020238,"score_gpt":0.2979605197128497,"score_spread":0.26760044958882945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300131663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94660413,0.021397898,0.00025784175,0.012404498,0.00014243042,0.00007222553,0.0066893995,0.000022551782,0.012408971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921887,0.0029708087,0.00012505411,0.00092324446,0.000030318097,0.000034076733,0.0010156775,0.000008273613,0.0027039926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971762,0.0012434679,0.00010088033,0.0003014552,0.00037241724,0.0008055867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97929984,0.0072657,0.00591825,0.0016988934,0.002315584,0.003501805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038143161,0.00035300892,0.00079569995,0.0010250694,0.0023406278,0.0016373666,0.0015671804,0.0013937,0.010878443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0129219135,0.00031347535,0.0014204131,0.0027064558,0.0013660787,0.00071281404,0.0010456952,0.001321661,0.00033848247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001880011,0.00048723794,0.9460429,0.00029771778,0.0017064201,0.0002530894,0.0016005007,0.00091324106,0.00017969985,0.0024241419,0.008476759,0.035738215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000849209,0.00008530508,0.9959223,0.00021044862,0.00039308314,0.000010607922,0.00050405343,0.00016513607,0.000043518492,0.00015849661,0.0024106156,0.000011404107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96841305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9798094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031586945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013829504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0138786575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100340545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302768472","doi":"","title":"Not for the Profit, but for the Training? Gender Differences in Training in the For-Profit and Non-Profit Sectors","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Profit (economics); Training (meteorology); For profit; Business; Gross profit; Marketing; Economics; Microeconomics; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.1817160381842256,"score_gpt":0.38179125910366213,"score_spread":0.20007522091943652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302768472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706989,0.0017220294,0.0005481611,0.0070629464,0.0001037407,0.000021230366,0.0026657481,0.000015500886,0.017161643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99555737,0.0003569473,0.00013576182,0.00042678893,0.00002553179,0.0000057330635,0.0004298115,0.0000053716703,0.0030566705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988243,0.00010950474,0.000023050334,0.00011326669,0.0002199647,0.0007098821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997647,0.00052644714,0.00070593634,0.00015340092,0.00021144729,0.00075575017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010961535,0.00012910027,0.00037464863,0.00073985313,0.00083537836,0.0010566486,0.000491765,0.00042072998,0.00858202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048861937,0.00008733094,0.00028283085,0.001446069,0.00093500933,0.000671866,0.0004923675,0.0006836063,0.00075510226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034674752,0.00010978169,0.91779786,0.0000715061,0.00008721397,0.00019337054,0.0046988283,0.0006725553,0.0009135115,0.010510737,0.012381523,0.052216362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009905992,0.000037217702,0.9847835,0.000074290125,0.000023000623,0.00005960221,0.004765749,0.00032218714,0.00020137493,0.0018759981,0.007836737,0.000010387778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4339211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63734037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4339211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025858372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027236354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8627908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302769027","doi":"","title":"Are Lone Mothers Responsive to Policy Changes? Evidence from a Workfare Reform in a Generous Welfare State","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workfare; Welfare reform; Welfare; Economics; State (computer science); Welfare state; Labour economics; Political science; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.06295010452925016,"score_gpt":0.3655136107460853,"score_spread":0.30256350621683514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302769027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8948858,0.008820693,0.0003389353,0.054156117,0.0003538666,0.00006183564,0.00084129523,0.000009765866,0.04053185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878364,0.0040804283,0.00009815547,0.0054547726,0.00014158551,0.000050484687,0.00021093241,0.0000063618486,0.0021208448],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938139,0.0036730052,0.0002357249,0.00045626226,0.0007017414,0.0011194258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97130585,0.015403747,0.009215702,0.0012995283,0.001651118,0.001123989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008609795,0.00015324191,0.00040136473,0.0005346307,0.0011788607,0.0017576421,0.00078740064,0.0018238827,0.0073551023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030468397,0.00021618757,0.00040747947,0.00095491175,0.002040805,0.0014635497,0.0022212297,0.0018095358,0.0005180933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0069719916,0.0019365423,0.6274835,0.0023465874,0.00093967206,0.0021885035,0.0451061,0.0014799827,0.0015296477,0.050392162,0.029348882,0.23027633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068698556,0.001077814,0.8616509,0.0018136108,0.0004739097,0.00020226916,0.058533072,0.00035047572,0.0009766977,0.005233261,0.06894041,0.00006059799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023446718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023523595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023446718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002034814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021211132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04662049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306937158","doi":"10.1111/caje.12628","title":"Unbundling female empowerment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Empowerment; Unbundling; Norm (philosophy); Poverty; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Economic growth; Business; Economics; Industrial organization","score_opus":0.10903918546047751,"score_gpt":0.21499991190116013,"score_spread":0.10596072644068262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306937158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2014111,0.009032443,0.08439855,0.09824241,0.0015841398,0.00016612707,0.00015542503,0.000088935056,0.60492086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764939,0.0021120976,0.0054747667,0.002531774,0.0002767446,0.00007702514,0.000024653158,0.000022663953,0.012986397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923126,0.004805246,0.00017661123,0.00065524736,0.0011990201,0.0008512134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99409014,0.0022027933,0.001138506,0.0008699592,0.0011067338,0.00059187383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008109425,0.00047106433,0.00037981808,0.0013816772,0.0030770397,0.005056423,0.00069886446,0.0011866858,0.0049867914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008706988,0.00014042333,0.00038214616,0.00083871273,0.024001706,0.00594945,0.007035161,0.0022636382,0.00037142032],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011891383,0.000015483041,0.0019401526,0.00004583752,0.000004473086,0.000055125332,0.0065314136,0.00021500184,0.0002305971,0.9659781,0.0017204077,0.023251507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000096950835,0.00007292959,0.004645747,0.00061603845,0.000010914102,0.00020248003,0.016349463,0.00083418225,0.00094736315,0.77879953,0.19748177,0.000029812252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003562995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052175634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008109425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042080847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057202494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04288721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307128056","doi":"10.1007/s00148-022-00927-9","title":"2023 Kuznets Prize awarded to Garima Rastogi and Anisha Sharma","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Peking University; University of Toronto; University of Texas Rio Grande Valley; Reed College; University of Oklahoma; Sapienza Università di Roma; Jinan University; Baylor University; National University of Singapore; Università Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emila; Yale University","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Social policy; Human capital; Sociology; Economic growth; Socioeconomic status; Economics; Political science; Population","score_opus":0.026939728710973193,"score_gpt":0.2858941914923507,"score_spread":0.25895446278137746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307128056","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009996582,0.048254516,0.0025626258,0.21669008,0.56558424,0.00017860731,0.0021404375,0.00023354332,0.15435937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06724374,0.01763804,0.001096043,0.0086387,0.07679123,0.00008404611,0.00089964573,0.00026263722,0.8273459],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910647,0.00013859342,0.000056774737,0.00019246727,0.00028579117,0.00021983996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757034,0.00013936567,0.00008196184,0.00007299367,0.0009054072,0.0012298774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019467514,0.0013331661,0.0015617477,0.0014615963,0.0016409548,0.0032604018,0.0006999633,0.0021300642,0.05567434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032488036,0.00030861687,0.00077182625,0.0005750878,0.0008785186,0.0012928981,0.00366355,0.002564408,0.02179481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020262926,0.000039949336,0.00036667986,0.00007768096,0.000032695345,0.00015798718,0.000063836604,0.00040813058,0.00051961123,0.016476,0.9478758,0.03377906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030107913,0.00007276606,0.0029287157,0.00010899794,0.000020252686,0.00025102097,0.0001407759,0.00054049154,0.00041740946,0.0050532445,0.9904163,0.000019932975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038444716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061892085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05567434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00311469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028757448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18624926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310399239","doi":"10.1257/aeri.20210485","title":"Partisan Fertility and Presidential Elections","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review Insights","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Surprise; Economics; Politics; Presidential system; Democracy; Demographic economics; General election; Total fertility rate; Presidential election; Power (physics); Political economy; Development economics; Political science; Sociology; Family planning; Demography; Population; Law","score_opus":0.02000459938045719,"score_gpt":0.2924093059582638,"score_spread":0.27240470657780663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310399239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88878417,0.0030203718,0.0007117039,0.0054479754,0.00013841054,0.000012440185,0.0006924118,0.00001777522,0.10117478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965898,0.0007289606,0.000028938366,0.00012514586,0.00008759557,0.0000028609065,0.000100980076,0.0000035580867,0.0023322124],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995504,0.00020210599,0.000009228732,0.000042863125,0.00005184728,0.00014359465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970714,0.0011630631,0.0010981357,0.000120784454,0.00018683035,0.00035980536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011920786,0.00006163691,0.00016376612,0.00055866974,0.00052009866,0.0010041182,0.00013487966,0.00023683795,0.009519594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005601478,0.00007769183,0.00017584732,0.000891024,0.0005153644,0.00033571015,0.00048173187,0.00040531176,0.0006048019],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005064094,0.00021874381,0.7087737,0.00020023597,0.00024166709,0.0003598817,0.0039937426,0.005538556,0.0007254055,0.13801827,0.034747764,0.10667566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017956881,0.000075306554,0.9540892,0.00004736489,0.000036208992,0.00007463612,0.002293691,0.0012045625,0.00016764324,0.01343082,0.02855032,0.000012235188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006840962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011252304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009519594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007723851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037694175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031846285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312638833","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4239601","title":"Expansions in Paid Parental Leave and Mothers’ Economic Progress","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parental leave; Norwegian; Childbirth; Quarter (Canadian coin); Differential (mechanical device); Government (linguistics); Demographic economics; Ranking (information retrieval); Gender pay gap; Labour economics; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Wage; Pregnancy; Geography","score_opus":0.010723612554406648,"score_gpt":0.2634875513825022,"score_spread":0.25276393882809556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312638833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957402,0.0003026576,0.000044304517,0.0009787335,0.000017588163,0.0000017843365,0.0001228841,0.0000022731128,0.0027897258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986071,0.000106669075,0.000013419724,0.000033153785,0.0000147486535,0.0000023755517,0.00006272486,0.0000010666928,0.0011588263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932957,0.00020537512,0.000030487592,0.00005986717,0.00007167226,0.0003030056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955811,0.0020133539,0.0010938484,0.0001456488,0.00021966256,0.000946293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015158982,0.000099077304,0.00021390978,0.00068885024,0.00067363784,0.0010419298,0.0003780154,0.0006632936,0.00993852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007839338,0.00013023906,0.00020330171,0.0007196516,0.0005784991,0.0008657549,0.001091004,0.0010212726,0.00046678196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005974313,0.00024972926,0.9590624,0.000028445316,0.000035720703,0.00056930387,0.00885481,0.00049037294,0.0003102742,0.006033471,0.0012134619,0.022554515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012242153,0.00007968693,0.982832,0.00003628818,0.00001360716,0.00015278552,0.013254862,0.00026256032,0.000088890236,0.00094654446,0.0023145822,0.0000060063803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011518678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019511383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011518678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083865924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007910177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03324765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312924045","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4297424","title":"Anticipated Gender Discrimination and Grade Disclosure","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Grading (engineering); Incentive; Masking (illustration); Statistical discrimination; Transparency (behavior); Gender discrimination; Gender gap; Psychology; Gender bias; Accounting; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.024681704161298786,"score_gpt":0.28972170052987867,"score_spread":0.2650399963685799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312924045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99565375,0.00014108681,0.00005487044,0.00043735246,0.0000261851,0.000014831778,0.00012339621,0.0000030425822,0.003545472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872273,0.00005715121,0.000027631593,0.000045927107,0.000011528607,0.0000063849297,0.00005569935,0.0000011828506,0.0010717774],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977937,0.00075419,0.0002084894,0.00015565357,0.00044442885,0.00064363773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767417,0.007647684,0.009763131,0.00094247854,0.0014478954,0.0034572347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027284967,0.00021832615,0.00034179733,0.00082015013,0.0015190779,0.0031008774,0.00054074684,0.0013264328,0.0077662226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028220916,0.00021016346,0.0004964936,0.0006480684,0.0007175178,0.00091613905,0.001599156,0.002345932,0.0008489192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034682374,0.0006895661,0.98929745,0.000017841765,0.000031201784,0.00020124887,0.002627788,0.00010124728,0.00016856284,0.00070648064,0.0002988436,0.0055129207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020529053,0.00045576738,0.98762345,0.000053188112,0.000044511464,0.00037002107,0.008386239,0.00039600325,0.0005079163,0.00086997385,0.0012486681,0.000023758084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060125487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011018158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077662226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008368116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012312094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025980592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313033276","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4283321","title":"Labor-Leisure Choices in the Long Run: Is YOLO Sustainable?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Economics; Business; Natural resource economics","score_opus":0.008174293030389072,"score_gpt":0.26408504253096327,"score_spread":0.2559107495005742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313033276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.974797,0.0020323747,0.00009830889,0.013096764,0.00008509207,0.000005867099,0.00022709534,0.00000244718,0.009655079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962315,0.00093633245,0.000041181713,0.000512801,0.000024502988,0.00000582078,0.000042533156,0.0000016231288,0.0022036836],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997907,0.00006131522,0.0000041500516,0.000017831548,0.000013341325,0.000112613765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993374,0.00008974503,0.00017921597,0.000010752219,0.000039928396,0.00034302735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005495371,0.00010066637,0.00025858442,0.00025758342,0.0012658674,0.0019935842,0.00023027803,0.00056586135,0.0052472353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000916051,0.000104878476,0.00014029484,0.00050739973,0.0012894603,0.0010596486,0.0010791365,0.0007022989,0.0003348674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009741379,0.0008024319,0.8717585,0.0001880663,0.00014429407,0.00058260426,0.021353306,0.00032622906,0.0015990684,0.023762865,0.009256741,0.06925184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004512734,0.0002700809,0.8622235,0.00048880436,0.00007326029,0.000061531646,0.10872952,0.00032528737,0.00022555045,0.0069564898,0.020569371,0.000031536816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031121623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14174128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031121623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008897002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017281207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061880946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313353061","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-01775-9_14","title":"Margaret Gilpin Reid (1896–1991)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Poverty; Sociology; Positive economics; Population; Work (physics); Economics; Economic history; Economic growth; Demography; Engineering","score_opus":0.029784759114535597,"score_gpt":0.2647937911317072,"score_spread":0.2350090320171716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313353061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014469058,0.2649164,0.0011135644,0.034168616,0.029281331,0.000056771656,0.00054143486,0.0001323476,0.66834265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034726455,0.01991257,0.00021363726,0.002450535,0.00089609704,0.000017414171,0.00005456919,0.000040346196,0.9729423],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977034,0.00003818878,0.000008444926,0.00007171057,0.00007752867,0.00003375024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998518,0.000040994088,0.000012197145,0.000007718061,0.000055859404,0.000031443247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004903359,0.00066210114,0.00042310925,0.001500532,0.0020602215,0.0015636128,0.0006445134,0.0013792929,0.09578854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008725683,0.00033571414,0.00018180859,0.0012741212,0.0009584552,0.0024053745,0.0015274909,0.001832553,0.038868353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016494447,0.000012634409,0.00012256292,0.00008503793,0.000001552821,0.00008166873,0.00058666134,0.00004495502,0.000086563785,0.028308874,0.8937213,0.07693181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.924825e-7,0.000001814786,0.000075580865,0.000040096274,3.6809925e-7,0.000036299076,0.000054289438,0.0000032664498,0.000018094901,0.00067945436,0.99908924,0.0000010820648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013018658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045902066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09578854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025453158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014502227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32044458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317369542","doi":"10.3138/9781487552305-008","title":"6 Generational Conflict: Intimacy, Money, and “Miniskirt” Feminism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.030791099205268103,"score_gpt":0.23855153451080358,"score_spread":0.20776043530553548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317369542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14997841,0.015056633,0.0025516895,0.080551945,0.0006762145,0.000028064847,0.000036248126,0.000025585185,0.7510953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96808517,0.0015535856,0.0002638174,0.0032854676,0.00015248747,0.000016865975,0.000009081398,0.000016011263,0.026617568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970004,0.0019676709,0.00003377963,0.0001479342,0.0003403884,0.00050981366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989021,0.0004921294,0.00015401295,0.000088277884,0.000101269696,0.0002622526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026627393,0.00041121122,0.00018913095,0.00080964866,0.014745022,0.007093244,0.0010296773,0.0021493093,0.00582002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002514222,0.00018507497,0.0001326481,0.00073128834,0.041905914,0.004922286,0.0070338417,0.0022241073,0.00039943864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001165878,0.000014017995,0.0017235639,0.000020654992,0.0000025384022,0.0005207396,0.1901707,0.00003779643,0.000061018818,0.7871251,0.010167927,0.010144284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013983579,0.000020025112,0.0025803102,0.00030037595,0.000004040674,0.0010233973,0.24943839,0.00012799696,0.00015954277,0.18636122,0.5599502,0.00002048551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023045376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04430888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023045376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073415576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038275023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053267002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318698920","doi":"10.1038/s41562-023-01523-x","title":"Author Correction: Within-job gender pay inequality in 15 countries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Nature Human Behaviour","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS","keywords":"Inequality; Psychology; Demographic economics; Gender inequality; Sociology; Labour economics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04587240705349428,"score_gpt":0.3548395890034942,"score_spread":0.30896718194999995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318698920","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039799858,0.00094269717,0.0013249179,0.043345235,0.9411392,0.000027841515,0.0063218903,0.00052365864,0.0059765843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056194667,0.011087215,0.015202227,0.0582674,0.20692772,0.00058870815,0.02304951,0.005868799,0.62281376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99459416,0.0009060706,0.0009691713,0.00095679093,0.002285292,0.0002884916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9491354,0.011958024,0.0019296835,0.0033558975,0.032726098,0.0008948688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054155923,0.0018471729,0.0016396755,0.0048084953,0.0031961529,0.0035343426,0.0030497466,0.0032338921,0.08430327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08268464,0.0008034583,0.0012689148,0.0057365173,0.0018952208,0.0024849772,0.0025726478,0.0063315374,0.03586244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012422798,0.0000016091902,0.00007906467,0.000069829315,0.0000051408706,0.00006998626,0.0000555782,0.000028965052,0.000010242521,0.0007633266,0.99559,0.0033139915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039520113,0.000012088778,0.0015791991,0.00083929405,0.000047902962,0.00046110796,0.00037948665,0.00035924822,0.00034330596,0.0028757832,0.99300534,0.000057691315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039418187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038417727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08430327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035893708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066033863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28202248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318992413","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4344410","title":"Does Co-Residence with Parents-in-Law Reduce Women's Employment in India?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Demographic economics; Political science; Law; Labour economics; Economics","score_opus":0.012219072422715294,"score_gpt":0.29025213486249596,"score_spread":0.27803306243978065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318992413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919104,0.0005135988,0.00002316328,0.0041232547,0.000050673945,0.0000059185813,0.00009835426,0.000004917047,0.003269577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986525,0.0002550333,0.000024797993,0.00030262597,0.000017028124,0.000005064136,0.000028787419,0.0000021342628,0.0007120363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857974,0.0004086756,0.000044105112,0.00009018077,0.0001142714,0.0007630101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961051,0.00087147113,0.0010104515,0.0001387912,0.00019254701,0.0016817161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000700046,0.00012986318,0.00024974966,0.0005367809,0.0025484276,0.0012972425,0.0013881148,0.0007886461,0.007829123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047223186,0.00023060037,0.00034127373,0.0009965682,0.0016182817,0.00073763874,0.0021930796,0.001418,0.00036646498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030574377,0.00051596476,0.94420385,0.0001365024,0.00007831427,0.0012317351,0.01742059,0.0001070519,0.0003671827,0.002362258,0.0029332852,0.030337593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011526171,0.00015167818,0.9256354,0.00016558393,0.000058607122,0.0003008058,0.06951931,0.00008443427,0.00011764894,0.0003378013,0.0036051304,0.000011913484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1051301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21301384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1051301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019143058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053929556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20903635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319997731","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4326170","title":"Gender Specific Distortions, Entrepreneurship and Misallocation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Business; Economics; Labour economics; Finance","score_opus":0.0259373471685616,"score_gpt":0.27612952027021276,"score_spread":0.25019217310165115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319997731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9481597,0.000459877,0.0020452384,0.0017102839,0.000016710525,0.000022893853,0.00016575208,0.000012777396,0.047406737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980959,0.00008500444,0.00014638506,0.00003075223,0.000005801392,0.000005098452,0.000017530085,0.0000033170063,0.0016101131],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900395,0.00038829044,0.000046635992,0.00011210752,0.00019222322,0.00025678164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99454355,0.0025299715,0.001212256,0.00083321903,0.00039372707,0.0004872552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017671578,0.00015569245,0.0003591534,0.001068487,0.0007976419,0.0023777187,0.00039693507,0.0005212243,0.010447639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012437529,0.00015058105,0.0001561395,0.0014617222,0.0025744324,0.0016293662,0.0019742534,0.0004344147,0.00044821308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088244386,0.00030605527,0.46434593,0.00014577407,0.000072562136,0.00090879784,0.010790179,0.00474798,0.0016945112,0.422492,0.0028141178,0.090799764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006294311,0.00019109702,0.41772354,0.000099608566,0.000046409346,0.000731842,0.028278647,0.0040034056,0.0015619055,0.5302471,0.017018426,0.000035003763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020644078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003636329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010447639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013227736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010279523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034950852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320013873","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4331137","title":"Does Co-Residence with Parents-In-Law Reduce Women's Employment In India?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Demographic economics; Instrumental variable; Panel data; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.012219072422715294,"score_gpt":0.29025213486249596,"score_spread":0.27803306243978065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320013873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919104,0.0005135988,0.00002316328,0.0041232547,0.000050673945,0.0000059185813,0.00009835426,0.000004917047,0.003269577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986525,0.0002550333,0.000024797993,0.00030262597,0.000017028124,0.000005064136,0.000028787419,0.0000021342628,0.0007120363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857974,0.0004086756,0.000044105112,0.00009018077,0.0001142714,0.0007630101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961051,0.00087147113,0.0010104515,0.0001387912,0.00019254701,0.0016817161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000700046,0.00012986318,0.00024974966,0.0005367809,0.0025484276,0.0012972425,0.0013881148,0.0007886461,0.007829123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047223186,0.00023060037,0.00034127373,0.0009965682,0.0016182817,0.00073763874,0.0021930796,0.001418,0.00036646498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030574377,0.00051596476,0.94420385,0.0001365024,0.00007831427,0.0012317351,0.01742059,0.0001070519,0.0003671827,0.002362258,0.0029332852,0.030337593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011526171,0.00015167818,0.9256354,0.00016558393,0.000058607122,0.0003008058,0.06951931,0.00008443427,0.00011764894,0.0003378013,0.0036051304,0.000011913484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1051301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21301384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1051301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019143058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053929556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20903635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320494785","doi":"10.1080/00036846.2023.2174938","title":"Do educational inequalities between marital partners influence the empowerment of educated women in ECOWAS?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Empowerment; Endogeneity; Spouse; Marital status; Inequality; Women's empowerment; Demographic economics; Economics; Power (physics); Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.030117391934471934,"score_gpt":0.308085200025778,"score_spread":0.27796780809130606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320494785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99433523,0.00041267177,0.00006720985,0.0014494543,0.000021384896,0.00000926348,0.00007908417,7.8416076e-7,0.003624972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992519,0.00017852482,0.000019040504,0.00011177595,0.000007457179,0.000004254589,0.00002153183,7.2680325e-7,0.00040464464],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850154,0.00058079575,0.000053634132,0.00012051165,0.00011717408,0.0006263398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969457,0.001150907,0.0009225441,0.00012834845,0.00015412892,0.00069833774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013903977,0.00018339,0.00030080328,0.0005277487,0.0013205073,0.0018125612,0.00038483244,0.00048106862,0.0059057195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007272273,0.0001842281,0.00035547488,0.000984899,0.0014620111,0.0014969697,0.0021672195,0.0010540526,0.00032740508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009166457,0.00018128309,0.9646145,0.000029302424,0.000055000186,0.00026219134,0.019769417,0.000035809822,0.00008857084,0.0016204474,0.00039734354,0.012854542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010255514,0.00009761409,0.9261258,0.00014543805,0.00004390934,0.00010685656,0.06850838,0.00014774737,0.00007918007,0.0013687792,0.0033549021,0.000011056585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022041827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04688848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022041827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079893507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010241058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043827057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321513703","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2022.70.supp.milligan","title":"All in the Family: Assessing Need in the Fiscal Unit","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Unit (ring theory); Fiscal system; Economics; Fiscal year; Standard of living; Measuring poverty; Demographic economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Economic policy; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.05272382642777265,"score_gpt":0.2703453632176448,"score_spread":0.21762153678987214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321513703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990357,0.00025398482,0.00028233847,0.00031316408,0.000013528589,0.000025917274,0.00012640622,0.0000037075158,0.008623942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903023,0.0001185172,0.00025603303,0.000021818147,0.000004018254,0.00001836491,0.00006198092,0.0000012421549,0.00048779813],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988175,0.00041190002,0.00009002194,0.00005451584,0.0003823472,0.00024366895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99644357,0.0007463383,0.0010839064,0.000102660815,0.00085031043,0.0007732203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002028307,0.00022644213,0.00029040826,0.0032036174,0.002373813,0.0012329151,0.0005673349,0.00035595763,0.0025926584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008424378,0.0001134882,0.00028615317,0.0019744139,0.0013156296,0.0018746529,0.0019622198,0.00043429257,0.00014533376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018146023,0.00012384489,0.9074298,0.00009347152,0.000042972773,0.00031091264,0.03750453,0.0002578937,0.0003429071,0.0024631459,0.0016549684,0.0495941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065507493,0.00017960099,0.84782517,0.000102016675,0.000029599776,0.00038853905,0.1418255,0.00043584313,0.00027783684,0.0016334713,0.0072585605,0.000037243746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089877084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1438706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91012293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038158135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028887268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17870784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323317988","doi":"10.1017/s1474746422000720","title":"The Mixed Impact of Care Work on the Finances of Low-income Canadians: Insights from the Canadian Financial Diaries Research Project","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; Canadian Mennonite University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Care work; Low income; Economic growth; Child care; Income Support; Paid work; Business; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Socioeconomics; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.05039512627703179,"score_gpt":0.35890919171608093,"score_spread":0.30851406543904913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323317988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95540905,0.0013226359,0.00013358734,0.011686316,0.00007600276,0.00007909408,0.00073520985,0.0000058607593,0.030552259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936458,0.0009597017,0.00016844469,0.0011913558,0.000016725398,0.00003336508,0.0001679066,0.00001048981,0.003806255],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917305,0.0017749909,0.00014189686,0.00037886467,0.0023953523,0.0035784564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882366,0.002688767,0.0011160078,0.0002728374,0.0038312918,0.0038544904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062880307,0.00042735922,0.00068874034,0.0043875948,0.04114988,0.008364965,0.0024353943,0.001101471,0.00440629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0114242025,0.00037571983,0.00031261373,0.007902195,0.01082657,0.0019510067,0.006309313,0.0027136481,0.00021753863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013522565,0.00021726929,0.17458808,0.0002004027,0.000034374603,0.00085372064,0.7468584,0.00011394497,0.00030894892,0.016566638,0.01746178,0.042661116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008545725,0.000025887668,0.12520343,0.0002462249,0.000014976918,0.00006942469,0.841516,0.000081657614,0.00007228395,0.000639803,0.032081563,0.00004022295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99323833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12752503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12752503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16254833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92526317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323666330","doi":"10.1080/17516234.2023.2182157","title":"The impact of Vietnam’s 2013 extension of paid maternity leave on women’s labour force participation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Asian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; McGill University","funders":"FHI 360; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Maternity leave; Vietnamese; Regression discontinuity design; Demographic economics; Formal education; Labour economics; Percentage point; Economics; Medicine; Psychology","score_opus":0.034824919744996505,"score_gpt":0.3520587817209764,"score_spread":0.31723386197597986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323666330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943116,0.00050424656,0.00011739965,0.0017127664,0.000045511344,0.00003105869,0.00030082383,0.000003823154,0.002972909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984072,0.00025093008,0.000106168336,0.00029290962,0.000015710193,0.000037509384,0.00012468726,0.0000019593044,0.00076288375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981079,0.0009478966,0.00006297052,0.000121959594,0.00019094482,0.0005683189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699855,0.00094263017,0.00081318873,0.000114607465,0.0002809875,0.0008501077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029438455,0.00013671658,0.00021158697,0.0002387358,0.0005913819,0.00086664263,0.00054172054,0.0003663958,0.0020173427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051284856,0.00015926232,0.00033675932,0.00037448687,0.00058033975,0.00043507424,0.0009497341,0.00092326687,0.00008257075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017851092,0.0014713085,0.82153183,0.0006316696,0.00036433805,0.0012699298,0.016634293,0.004390677,0.0020420756,0.006891552,0.004933507,0.1380537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004579958,0.0006651425,0.98176265,0.00032289632,0.000047335776,0.00009637086,0.0072123776,0.0008422443,0.0003715132,0.000311232,0.008299574,0.000022905808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.108312935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12566368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108312935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004300666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058136643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.215365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360998863","doi":"10.4324/9781003269564","title":"Children, the Law and the Welfare Principle","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.015931063668510773,"score_gpt":0.2646068532748829,"score_spread":0.24867578960637216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360998863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024495686,0.028898552,0.0012747749,0.015237724,0.0010558432,0.00002594063,0.000045660887,0.000024887499,0.95098704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11536724,0.039760537,0.002350097,0.012338261,0.0013394358,0.00011918888,0.00009501496,0.000084461084,0.82854575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914837,0.00028775618,0.000017320981,0.000075373064,0.00032218033,0.00014905618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968326,0.00016059146,0.000024995938,0.000018580738,0.00006679602,0.000045696557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008248047,0.00036633646,0.00023067601,0.00087243196,0.0051217168,0.005008067,0.00063899194,0.0014491121,0.007313567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012219737,0.00016520213,0.00017333875,0.0011794352,0.015651317,0.003512313,0.0019460864,0.0030225425,0.0011377491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018982106,0.0000045389206,0.00008045038,0.0000277207,7.6302075e-7,0.000041007,0.0029162508,0.00004360654,0.000030087234,0.95044386,0.036946747,0.009463068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014181022,0.0000037057728,0.00025145468,0.00012856223,0.0000011450841,0.000069764275,0.002052237,0.000026150254,0.000037900383,0.058286127,0.9391384,0.0000031120649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10866247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18888327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10866247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012873335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01383422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21605998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362504803","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_4076-2","title":"Teen Motherhood in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.01801319722807646,"score_gpt":0.2290612748833438,"score_spread":0.21104807765526734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362504803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16604266,0.08125821,0.00046111524,0.070381485,0.0039688097,0.00016611376,0.0013154328,0.00009736933,0.67630893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47575817,0.05129985,0.000681855,0.005813826,0.00024155273,0.00010639096,0.00046511114,0.000084632135,0.46554857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889225,0.000114839175,0.000020724237,0.0000558075,0.00028089475,0.0006355114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991493,0.00007843638,0.000035414312,0.000012161951,0.0002471263,0.0004775155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070292363,0.00027643502,0.00039627645,0.0012920168,0.016624674,0.004707079,0.0012913432,0.0017017396,0.014659109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015886963,0.00035320653,0.00031861922,0.0031838906,0.001819143,0.00081808405,0.0020625668,0.002982544,0.00071324117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067485074,0.000165746,0.023612129,0.00026653052,0.000020108442,0.0021430827,0.09593451,0.00055090565,0.00028960974,0.39592007,0.29904845,0.18198133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014235166,0.000023013174,0.022143869,0.00055502093,0.000014250175,0.00022472884,0.045512453,0.00024715363,0.00012766998,0.0029051579,0.928208,0.000024463216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9957073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08778525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08778525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23523252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6369296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366389447","doi":"10.4324/9781003193500-2","title":"Diversity in Canadian families","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Genealogy; Geography; Sociology; History; Anthropology","score_opus":0.04471455467882576,"score_gpt":0.25405389519941124,"score_spread":0.20933934052058548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366389447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05119588,0.04562496,0.001238432,0.024515776,0.0011827854,0.000071632196,0.00061520253,0.000053418607,0.87550193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69227797,0.04391162,0.0025110666,0.0035722554,0.00024570266,0.000078318946,0.00043458998,0.00010023185,0.25686824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980812,0.00027121653,0.000033416865,0.00019042852,0.00074119784,0.0006825207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916124,0.00012825102,0.000029878736,0.000034494467,0.0004409407,0.00020515751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014803283,0.00045169928,0.0003563861,0.0030312312,0.03222478,0.00726492,0.0013803809,0.0010197831,0.009135991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020315158,0.00023116126,0.0003714552,0.0058670766,0.009543543,0.0017274569,0.0033105642,0.0013027802,0.0005055592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026742875,0.00001133083,0.0041874805,0.00023920195,0.000013077562,0.00075191,0.16639331,0.00050134194,0.0002810658,0.5842163,0.124779485,0.11859877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028177653,0.000004997765,0.0076958304,0.00034011793,0.000009053607,0.0002702909,0.043810483,0.00009850216,0.00009684915,0.013023657,0.93462104,0.000026388552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13170251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13170251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12436523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9555731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366493850","doi":"10.46692/9781447332596.013","title":"Appendix: list of women reformers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appendix; Computer science; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.014640912399233905,"score_gpt":0.277398063941642,"score_spread":0.2627571515424081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366493850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022799894,0.0022713658,0.0010426831,0.006631162,0.0029167002,0.0009903718,0.08789061,0.0012370136,0.89474016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004988272,0.0013311215,0.0006740648,0.0020881882,0.00039686452,0.00077478605,0.017173821,0.00037703165,0.9721959],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996357,0.00006880906,0.00002470381,0.00004873572,0.00012733585,0.00009468855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983246,0.00031593378,0.00010393611,0.00011494643,0.0009163224,0.00022426446],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005716768,0.00048523332,0.0005466023,0.0017012941,0.0018178272,0.0014336824,0.0006968829,0.0005203499,0.7908762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037562596,0.00030408113,0.00018003555,0.0026519657,0.00021511999,0.0020644001,0.0011265385,0.0008666265,0.5212514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008412879,0.000010825967,0.00013514953,0.000047144855,2.4689055e-7,0.000009575647,0.00009287424,0.0000036191625,0.000014486303,0.0006979995,0.9842678,0.014711821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044197136,0.0000060759417,0.00062678,0.00004322726,5.462593e-7,0.000021125508,0.00026239734,0.0000075610974,0.000023712237,0.00020330594,0.99879885,0.0000019281563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076053506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014160759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7908762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001569206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018198235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29828966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367844675","doi":"10.1080/00220388.2023.2188113","title":"Revisiting the Determinants of Non-farm Labour Income in the Peruvian Andes: The Role of Intra-Seasonal Climate Variability and Widespread Family Networks","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Development Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Diversification (marketing strategy); Climate change; Geography; Indigenous; Population; Agriculture; Household income; Socioeconomics; Demographic economics; Economics; Agricultural economics; Ecology; Business; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.024224773416638923,"score_gpt":0.30739563798485164,"score_spread":0.2831708645682127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367844675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99886864,0.00017752276,0.000051626314,0.00012085594,9.936409e-7,0.0000028898392,0.000049663362,9.514267e-7,0.0007268236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99967444,0.00009788571,0.000027033542,0.0000072240405,0.0000020192874,0.0000034411337,0.000035811918,4.793759e-7,0.00015172103],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969053,0.00013278877,0.000010062515,0.00004884458,0.00002985647,0.00008795589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908805,0.0003666167,0.00032482794,0.000051677456,0.00006762359,0.00010122028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005134284,0.00019263188,0.00023451653,0.00057200086,0.00063790946,0.00067067804,0.00034540068,0.00023795836,0.0028616674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002058724,0.00012386519,0.00023820146,0.0009260279,0.00048240993,0.0006946017,0.0011753921,0.00034733803,0.0001419853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028429373,0.000035273886,0.9856383,0.000029075785,0.000046229467,0.0003048536,0.0071506407,0.0001057522,0.00024915478,0.00041323152,0.0001248104,0.0058742547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013652063,0.000026215137,0.99226135,0.000019676332,0.000011706437,0.00006703303,0.0067458316,0.00020519014,0.000023467654,0.00010787917,0.0005284316,0.0000019928927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020451147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032773737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020451147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033312346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034328626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040664256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375852046","doi":"10.3386/w31212","title":"The Gender Well-being Gap","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender gap; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.47867364960473063,"score_gpt":0.5440275910483061,"score_spread":0.06535394144357548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375852046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8397383,0.025748158,0.007308707,0.040688578,0.0016026698,0.000037950227,0.0027201225,0.000029755673,0.082125574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99162114,0.0028044286,0.0005108574,0.0023861001,0.00043892747,0.0000322963,0.00038329107,0.000013190114,0.001809775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853253,0.0006218121,0.000050214432,0.00031412288,0.00023825801,0.00024298967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99497235,0.002796109,0.0008614582,0.00031434427,0.000527742,0.0005280554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044996548,0.0002232009,0.0004384784,0.0013017675,0.0007749064,0.0015540207,0.0004057041,0.00044593922,0.0111194905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010799926,0.000096145304,0.00037799432,0.0014898103,0.0015031627,0.0018271409,0.0018953544,0.0010345525,0.0007535255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005123958,0.00014545505,0.50696313,0.0005526883,0.00025466442,0.0008371502,0.03476632,0.0006121686,0.0010585428,0.24087182,0.023814294,0.18961133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001924265,0.00023942764,0.7807388,0.0008971334,0.000099087694,0.0007712913,0.031004786,0.00093160424,0.0005919226,0.09409117,0.09056754,0.000048133865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005910279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007673859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0111194905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006654676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005460586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037198365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376274352","doi":"10.4324/9781003383277","title":"Marriage Under Stress","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stress (linguistics); Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.035821833424823736,"score_gpt":0.2948060931011675,"score_spread":0.25898425967634375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376274352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10445929,0.06571834,0.0018597464,0.029015493,0.008324462,0.00012475219,0.00029467756,0.0001052126,0.7900981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4396909,0.05523632,0.0009144687,0.008934124,0.0023373978,0.00011883333,0.0002863034,0.000085846434,0.49239582],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963665,0.00012924851,0.00001493641,0.000043271324,0.0000904189,0.000085491934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980503,0.00003504381,0.000022294773,0.000017628965,0.00003622559,0.00008384522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040275446,0.00042526916,0.00044191867,0.00052112935,0.0041161366,0.0025649995,0.00038767103,0.0010250981,0.014012669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010713894,0.00016423024,0.0003444466,0.00085865223,0.0025919839,0.0018207706,0.0029190984,0.0020168743,0.0027561898],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013363718,0.00016746933,0.0069035604,0.00072720565,0.00003114093,0.007259669,0.14368968,0.00022122423,0.00287712,0.30169183,0.21080548,0.325492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010052533,0.00012829268,0.006531416,0.00062667805,0.000010961725,0.0048570815,0.050896026,0.00006872024,0.00028258367,0.028354168,0.9082172,0.000016926731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043180734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007424408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014012669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014573233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018656478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046877027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377115996","doi":"10.1093/polsoc/puad009","title":"Assessing public support for social policy in times of crisis: evidence from the Child Tax Credit during the COVID-19 era in the United States","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"George Mason University","keywords":"Earned income tax credit; Social policy; Context (archaeology); Population; Political science; State (computer science); Tax credit; Welfare state; Economic growth; Economics; Public economics; Sociology; Politics; Law; Demography","score_opus":0.08488794607422877,"score_gpt":0.3870377407013322,"score_spread":0.3021497946271034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377115996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949012,0.00025657378,0.000029806266,0.0024470922,0.000020323976,0.000016953194,0.00017197987,9.8277e-7,0.0021551803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991788,0.00024681535,0.000023457109,0.00027844307,0.0000148965155,0.0000175696,0.00009952594,9.64368e-7,0.00013943978],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967637,0.0019234689,0.0001319816,0.00016124909,0.0004039615,0.00061558373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97928005,0.008455328,0.007180876,0.00068492437,0.0021116408,0.002287178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072190394,0.00017553991,0.00023366125,0.0015287728,0.002474449,0.002049836,0.00079182466,0.0013722812,0.0026725917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02271745,0.00022590689,0.00031270226,0.0019679095,0.0018104203,0.0017731653,0.0022745999,0.002163842,0.0001546343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002620986,0.001065033,0.95268285,0.00008243232,0.00011160147,0.00016300695,0.024197666,0.00016060099,0.00007609122,0.0012298268,0.0035709457,0.016397785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020987021,0.00020401613,0.8595626,0.00016660907,0.000043750057,0.000032821292,0.13589363,0.00026045085,0.00009026643,0.0002791971,0.0034308927,0.000014820941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06878049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13803667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06878049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030331123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034744497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1367603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377942048","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_256","title":"Gender and Household Economics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.07992719004331841,"score_gpt":0.2592736210929754,"score_spread":0.179346431049657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377942048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003124957,0.06682535,0.0027358758,0.011434945,0.0009097387,0.000027003396,0.00014049416,0.000031267482,0.9147705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13283215,0.04928188,0.0018972391,0.0039931196,0.0016789011,0.00011758612,0.00017040646,0.000056928813,0.80997175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998454,0.00007537474,0.0000024035112,0.00001793229,0.000037627484,0.000021261172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998814,0.00007150061,0.0000056198414,0.00001291614,0.000019066367,0.000009491775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038392938,0.00041140214,0.00035337103,0.00059524534,0.0011180126,0.0020213518,0.0003635265,0.0012041425,0.021006366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008771064,0.00018962754,0.00013045383,0.0010189072,0.0022605623,0.00167516,0.0005955498,0.0013759008,0.0031247817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006918455,0.000024973235,0.00020849738,0.000030416073,0.0000025894544,0.00002510227,0.0002886639,0.00028778758,0.000047199857,0.90807194,0.064502165,0.026503667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034451878,0.000009217514,0.00079815654,0.00015090292,0.000002388691,0.00004487503,0.0005779847,0.00025907863,0.00005805289,0.63247204,0.3656202,0.0000036223623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057647815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011309141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021006366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017562773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094669807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07027334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377942116","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_257","title":"Gender and Social Security","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Social security; Computer security; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.0522069988966878,"score_gpt":0.28895312566931686,"score_spread":0.23674612677262907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377942116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021424706,0.03923137,0.0005336495,0.004572452,0.000933772,0.000021095078,0.00007041081,0.000018035867,0.9524767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.089459755,0.035902653,0.000821154,0.0028556047,0.00095448527,0.000105093415,0.000100170146,0.000040170693,0.8697609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998522,0.00006630764,0.0000030213105,0.000019081417,0.0000334699,0.00002588994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999249,0.000038346003,0.000005158648,0.000008371923,0.000010866773,0.000012447497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032710432,0.0005947681,0.00030126792,0.0006086645,0.0021000418,0.00290864,0.0003319134,0.0012726639,0.023172239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006194486,0.00015782616,0.00013424915,0.0008084968,0.003657967,0.0018923023,0.001053789,0.001715374,0.0043513486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000101471305,0.000029517572,0.00029637298,0.00004976577,0.000002467164,0.000052628588,0.0032386542,0.0001164135,0.000099981015,0.8742559,0.07803171,0.04381639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003298794,0.000015008823,0.0007983604,0.00028043293,0.0000023156165,0.00009136401,0.0029332556,0.000074792835,0.00006143444,0.20839211,0.78734285,0.000004846005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063891043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015295505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023172239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013136163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015222678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07751882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378381559","doi":"10.1515/9780773590823-014","title":"Changing Canadian Families","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Political science; Geography; History","score_opus":0.022953161346421926,"score_gpt":0.20900607456579123,"score_spread":0.18605291321936931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378381559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05234441,0.013781707,0.00077132543,0.110549316,0.0042915316,0.000093614966,0.00085883925,0.00013521085,0.8171741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2874724,0.009429795,0.0015662026,0.014782644,0.00025352454,0.00007436447,0.00034357727,0.00017783395,0.6858995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971424,0.00037706186,0.00002941857,0.00023675227,0.0006292907,0.0015851463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981658,0.00008960606,0.00003414384,0.000060194703,0.0007280119,0.00092233956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020223784,0.0006818345,0.00035321445,0.0015916881,0.040026393,0.008760249,0.0020851672,0.0024123187,0.049290948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035474724,0.00031680247,0.00047452576,0.0028111208,0.00671454,0.0028375944,0.004769832,0.0032472613,0.0023592743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084053376,0.00005773319,0.004809514,0.00012433591,0.000014331496,0.0007433445,0.0677882,0.00025275303,0.00045795296,0.27416727,0.52433246,0.12716812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040175123,0.000007269261,0.0026705496,0.000085962776,0.000005642102,0.000056090197,0.03723124,0.00003363604,0.00006283386,0.00240235,0.95742255,0.000018015804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99297196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99753976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15361686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15361686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.213791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98168445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378555538","doi":"10.15453/0191-5096.3067","title":"Journal of Sociology &amp; Social Welfare Vol. 32, No. 2 (June 2005)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Harvard Kennedy School; University at Albany; Harvard University","keywords":"Sociology; Social Welfare; Welfare; Economics; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.022761735708295643,"score_gpt":0.303418494841428,"score_spread":0.28065675913313237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378555538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055501093,0.2912891,0.0006902991,0.16236712,0.0063795527,0.000059164387,0.0007265649,0.00012813373,0.53281003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15581241,0.35495147,0.00084418117,0.030516328,0.009725367,0.00023453514,0.0008085364,0.00021289455,0.4468942],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990534,0.0004421886,0.000036856094,0.00007314661,0.00024946014,0.00014488224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998706,0.0004595041,0.00008345072,0.00009993765,0.00038404137,0.00026705224],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012469093,0.0007458161,0.0007309686,0.002142613,0.0040347343,0.0069716545,0.00047658448,0.0019441184,0.07659372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033494954,0.0004470963,0.00022796285,0.00384666,0.0032650277,0.0031289537,0.0029364717,0.0021709877,0.016971167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009915326,0.00006767855,0.0024169164,0.00029298972,0.0000094118805,0.000075638316,0.0045413016,0.00005485906,0.000075984775,0.04590276,0.8677222,0.078830376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005192844,0.000009482617,0.0020381392,0.0007104682,0.000004423034,0.00006735032,0.0033867208,0.000031314445,0.000014040537,0.007382105,0.98634714,0.0000036505855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016370244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025330115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9234063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004888731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006729262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25623155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378555728","doi":"10.15453/0191-5096.3344","title":"&lt;em&gt;Restructuring Family Policies: Convergences and Divergences.&lt;/em&gt; Maureen Baker.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.02633869421342977,"score_gpt":0.2750390866024366,"score_spread":0.24870039238900682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378555728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019897844,0.37622273,0.0014848313,0.23197623,0.008247515,0.000043890086,0.0021916942,0.00041039498,0.37743294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031225005,0.1438487,0.0015136715,0.014144273,0.0021283934,0.00008058257,0.00091920036,0.00035827165,0.805782],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969494,0.00007126864,0.000016880922,0.000049027833,0.00010518679,0.00006259701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995129,0.00012191146,0.000052447765,0.00002817481,0.00016854581,0.00011600301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069912756,0.0006163741,0.00037961864,0.0010535477,0.001148034,0.0022142995,0.0008294999,0.002461871,0.10050707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018253851,0.0004096653,0.00027703447,0.0019589504,0.0013120614,0.0052244016,0.0015200828,0.0020442847,0.025685595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000100888265,0.0000054751913,0.00012280747,0.000063890206,0.0000013819351,0.000033195905,0.00029575283,0.000037630063,0.000042671243,0.0065222937,0.9360164,0.05684832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038797807,0.000005917494,0.0019887213,0.0002818254,0.000002383803,0.00008863379,0.0008282653,0.00006632922,0.00012096273,0.0065160287,0.9900894,0.0000074533245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050852865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1027197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10050707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041136257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027491916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33622968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380480447","doi":"10.1111/padr.12562","title":"The US Council of Economic Advisers on Changing Female Labor Force Participation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Population and Development Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.09300016891910831,"score_gpt":0.34267245338763574,"score_spread":0.24967228446852743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380480447","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035828626,0.62749505,0.0009757861,0.21402252,0.05707962,0.0013651027,0.020436514,0.00036702247,0.07790017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0054523223,0.7985824,0.006341196,0.09192419,0.01572771,0.0054483567,0.013657214,0.0003495118,0.062517054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98124605,0.0050882003,0.0032439115,0.0009928878,0.008040026,0.0013888389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9331612,0.021853855,0.0074552493,0.0024043128,0.031807672,0.0033176178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02949396,0.0016601597,0.0029894842,0.013043421,0.001336681,0.0055153933,0.0037427507,0.006619998,0.043070473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07143477,0.0013609028,0.002459819,0.020705003,0.0013748077,0.0040961364,0.0032802739,0.007885909,0.019217566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028182569,0.000012965235,0.00014219707,0.0017396566,0.000023224546,0.000014919893,0.000016653488,0.000028489389,0.000017842847,0.0009626831,0.9561258,0.040887274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021996604,0.000008930158,0.0012398161,0.0076482906,0.000034222743,0.000015143743,0.000032467946,0.000015687958,0.000028419527,0.00032371032,0.9906213,0.000009935157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057721213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056893088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057721213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008099367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034712307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15598083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380627372","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2022-063","title":"Economic Security and Fertility: Evidence from the Mincome Experiment","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Economic rent; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05165462936218456,"score_gpt":0.3073748761888515,"score_spread":0.25572024682666694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380627372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885378,0.0012979783,0.0011064151,0.00078998314,0.00006819676,0.00012403014,0.0012658567,0.000022314278,0.0067873974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98710805,0.0008502807,0.0007551288,0.0004089342,0.00006611649,0.0002018911,0.00059768977,0.00001603161,0.009995865],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738115,0.0017777813,0.000046657227,0.0002790028,0.00027584416,0.00023956063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9648687,0.02671695,0.0038610885,0.0031846645,0.0006318241,0.0007367955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008738298,0.0003214813,0.00083897257,0.00027930172,0.0012442007,0.00080827303,0.000747734,0.0007314438,0.012777581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01569679,0.00028905284,0.0004337983,0.0005568991,0.0025849545,0.0006163959,0.0006794585,0.00088173343,0.0006481665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10258969,0.013088477,0.6839944,0.0018154233,0.0034394641,0.0010316444,0.014634712,0.0030128187,0.016891753,0.030637773,0.012186895,0.11667695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006200764,0.01927949,0.9113547,0.00025184482,0.0010688087,0.00029832934,0.0045823054,0.002218353,0.0063103368,0.0072104293,0.041046824,0.00017783555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1453557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17619312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8546443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001715018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026215494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2890193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381336488","doi":"10.1017/s0047279423000314","title":"Competition and childcare quality: Evidence from Quebec","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Quality (philosophy); Christian ministry; Subsidy; Demographic economics; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.060543607976657185,"score_gpt":0.3855921848844354,"score_spread":0.3250485769077782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381336488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9403937,0.01910315,0.0004099815,0.0052028946,0.000110905225,0.0000885243,0.013205349,0.000022810824,0.021462683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993457,0.0031165609,0.00012292826,0.0004473029,0.00002040595,0.000022352384,0.0015471037,0.000008569848,0.0012576726],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969072,0.0008888399,0.0001624913,0.00040456833,0.00094394665,0.00069297856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803741,0.004824523,0.0057146433,0.0006865352,0.0059362142,0.0024640122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027730484,0.00044062475,0.00066986674,0.0029430871,0.0029949427,0.002360067,0.001836005,0.0007924058,0.01008345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008766122,0.00028474047,0.0009783906,0.00788621,0.0021258956,0.00066077575,0.0013911262,0.0010917843,0.0003118639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023807722,0.00015588445,0.96884704,0.00041038252,0.0005170358,0.00021820956,0.0020540312,0.00045291905,0.00009893972,0.0018877378,0.006880943,0.01823871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020170804,0.000039128125,0.9939135,0.00039758996,0.000108633896,0.000032589953,0.0017031938,0.00028354867,0.00004414781,0.00008241559,0.0033533492,0.000021669915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99468344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03237494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03237494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025132628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23489773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382518913","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4487054","title":"Family States and the Income Gap between Men and Women in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.009802984160172622,"score_gpt":0.2429869361962248,"score_spread":0.2331839520360522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382518913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.985817,0.0017407937,0.000045360048,0.0020793674,0.00003288014,0.0000096926915,0.00093607453,0.0000052044675,0.0093335835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99644643,0.00059035484,0.000025486153,0.00010431429,0.0000052469954,0.0000034354173,0.00021043049,0.0000036895754,0.0026106145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984841,0.00010113334,0.000035500394,0.000102270045,0.00022412687,0.0010528963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768436,0.000302548,0.00029379214,0.000041500123,0.00055138563,0.0011264137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007974139,0.00018159152,0.0005314798,0.002079077,0.007976391,0.0031930292,0.0011334675,0.0005968491,0.007163715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030215844,0.00021127412,0.0005074948,0.00469065,0.0019281802,0.0009180169,0.002116921,0.0013125101,0.00021600482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003462982,0.00014407045,0.9279172,0.000054554577,0.000082207946,0.0005123081,0.02175816,0.00053165056,0.00013374345,0.015042567,0.0051714154,0.028305795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001940121,0.000035144025,0.9310328,0.00015743791,0.000037789418,0.00008713049,0.05687767,0.00058587786,0.00008498518,0.0011369709,0.00991072,0.000034081473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99859136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04251184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04251184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05463031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3084464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382703613","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4487319","title":"Economic Security Policy and Canada’s National Action Plan to End Gender-Based Violence: Is there a Role for Cash Transfers in Addressing Intimate Partner Violence?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Action plan; Action (physics); Cash; Cash transfers; Business; Political science; Computer security; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Economics; Finance; Computer science; Environmental health; Medicine; Management","score_opus":0.030368859897366117,"score_gpt":0.32034055979552956,"score_spread":0.28997169989816346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382703613","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046403285,0.005621353,0.00048987946,0.8342884,0.0024855956,0.0001924044,0.0026613348,0.000059568538,0.107798204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47918314,0.009399484,0.0031205148,0.3196583,0.0011100228,0.00040630152,0.0018133891,0.00009645006,0.18521239],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904841,0.0009416226,0.00020135487,0.00024285368,0.0026405172,0.005489629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980785,0.0032508075,0.00076659856,0.00024285818,0.0054478906,0.009506717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006644816,0.00058784796,0.0007580778,0.002550393,0.012520737,0.010772146,0.0029841778,0.013453756,0.017854674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02123112,0.0006063149,0.0011222851,0.0025362268,0.004189306,0.0030215483,0.0040824474,0.010141123,0.00068413094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035863105,0.00054716,0.040244397,0.00041521524,0.00017513469,0.000580375,0.0053001773,0.001821533,0.00042604312,0.3957635,0.4971823,0.057185553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003617272,0.00014806414,0.119904235,0.001773505,0.00022295568,0.00012871277,0.01771382,0.0022792136,0.00073298014,0.034160763,0.8222556,0.00031837093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9903619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99607533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9023999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.097600095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.50308585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70814157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382917269","doi":"","title":"Quand déclencher l'accouchement c'est confisquer la maternité aux femmes: Une analyse psychosociologique du travail des femmes (ouvrage bilingue français-anglais)","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.045074191033251367,"score_gpt":0.2778649263957871,"score_spread":0.23279073536253572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382917269","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24263385,0.14833994,0.003237459,0.36487842,0.007550303,0.00006828406,0.00021060511,0.00005303994,0.23302814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68877655,0.04564499,0.0017224142,0.025561674,0.0022527569,0.00013869828,0.000081469894,0.000088916015,0.23573256],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988194,0.0005910422,0.000020514295,0.000081774,0.00017802464,0.00030921696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983277,0.0010823207,0.00012090159,0.000051413608,0.00021592765,0.00020181258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026564077,0.00032933726,0.0002700769,0.0005390867,0.005597744,0.0047119693,0.00060596335,0.0025842069,0.0053603896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045916466,0.00022644817,0.00022198414,0.0010108241,0.008569731,0.0031189185,0.0013616068,0.0025156671,0.0008422101],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070590475,0.00004393583,0.009901154,0.0003646995,0.000018233444,0.0010014006,0.58877265,0.00009451401,0.0012381886,0.16967975,0.1099529,0.11886199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000873565,0.0000962271,0.030814664,0.0010001586,0.000019818008,0.0011064709,0.2870846,0.00006405707,0.00030892092,0.011659988,0.6678069,0.000029463821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14551666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28797576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14551666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035348127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008945159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2893393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384132964","doi":"10.1002/jid.3816","title":"Impacts of agricultural capital subsidies for women in Burkina Faso: Lessons from a Computable General Equilibrium model","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development; Department for International Development, UK Government; International Development Research Centre; Government of Canada","keywords":"Subsidy; Social accounting matrix; Computable general equilibrium; Economics; Endowment; Agriculture; Agricultural productivity; Economic inequality; Inequality; Unemployment; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Macroeconomics; Geography; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.032560307921932936,"score_gpt":0.30460296684270777,"score_spread":0.27204265892077484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384132964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91261834,0.000818916,0.047424525,0.0038523139,0.0000650312,0.00011740072,0.0008077992,0.0000821721,0.03421349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922638,0.0003042779,0.0022784222,0.000074624135,0.000010086226,0.000054358647,0.000086352615,0.0000075955477,0.0049204747],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997062,0.00014705367,0.0000072793337,0.000030397594,0.00001690444,0.000092113136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985185,0.0011799867,0.00011274421,0.000025656105,0.00009496178,0.00006812433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009060533,0.0005594144,0.001063684,0.0004144949,0.0007822746,0.001859508,0.0007072338,0.0016534714,0.0061237067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038037172,0.0003354673,0.00075145136,0.00039947347,0.0008085126,0.0011264607,0.0009443685,0.0009933175,0.00022608165],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012168109,0.0001372029,0.008276876,0.00007498614,0.000045760757,0.0005062007,0.00023091698,0.922459,0.00054003,0.061929338,0.0010237087,0.004654211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007593507,0.00009700275,0.0028273975,0.00003149942,0.00006637079,0.00003499884,0.0005762343,0.97478414,0.00017390102,0.019736923,0.0015759349,0.00001969053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10390203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05391135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10390203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00270595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002058155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20659453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384253992","doi":"10.18574/nyu/9781479814138.003.0008","title":"5 Social Parenthood in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"New York University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.05365183541320966,"score_gpt":0.23083941120297002,"score_spread":0.17718757578976035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384253992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033810727,0.06126508,0.0006789123,0.05533984,0.0029371907,0.00013321715,0.0009820003,0.00008627302,0.8447667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24751958,0.026548728,0.0010264204,0.0062974496,0.00022479543,0.00007906119,0.00035917718,0.00007177846,0.71787304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863666,0.00013734041,0.000019370531,0.00007506811,0.00031539125,0.00081621105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909234,0.000074134085,0.000021371454,0.000020417576,0.00031855205,0.00047325445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007212892,0.0004708648,0.00046364786,0.0013885829,0.020472504,0.006383719,0.0014485443,0.0028278104,0.027736155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014426771,0.00040055628,0.00038491705,0.0034985743,0.0033157193,0.0013470607,0.0020768198,0.003512031,0.0015533749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003543457,0.00007524979,0.0050472,0.00016162309,0.000010464534,0.0006580824,0.018521504,0.00052715646,0.0001600167,0.48673597,0.3724188,0.11564854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008589817,0.000012076443,0.00605379,0.00022483336,0.0000072339108,0.00007413298,0.009636108,0.00018674551,0.00006129521,0.005487929,0.9782281,0.000019208625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098284096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.098284096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3021852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71310437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384347289","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4449095","title":"The Impact of Child Benefit Programs on Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Parents' Health: Evidence in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Child health; Environmental health; Medicine; Economic growth; Business; Political science; Geography; Family medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.017976886584419736,"score_gpt":0.2957067205872105,"score_spread":0.2777298340027907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384347289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9453246,0.029026419,0.00006638033,0.006459772,0.00011875221,0.000100200814,0.00108164,0.0000075783014,0.017814752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880598,0.010072213,0.0001140818,0.00072985823,0.000019357069,0.00003705563,0.00015734343,0.0000033793167,0.0008069608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954862,0.0011286021,0.00015122449,0.0002029742,0.001048765,0.0019821604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98975694,0.0034966841,0.0014085262,0.00021460046,0.0023170095,0.002806202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033597334,0.00025352061,0.00072716735,0.001171775,0.004083481,0.0018767499,0.0016739634,0.00091625995,0.0034772144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016074847,0.0002453985,0.00074126496,0.0025683944,0.002298124,0.0006030707,0.0020968954,0.0015744121,0.000087303546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019924298,0.0012761082,0.8168936,0.0038501741,0.0013224155,0.000728451,0.020968024,0.00071716495,0.00032671719,0.006342088,0.0077335797,0.13784938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023066686,0.00036183416,0.9658216,0.0030815976,0.0010439111,0.00010089244,0.021221882,0.00023877287,0.00017722734,0.00055977557,0.0071222447,0.0000394588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9878369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036249112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036249112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10084833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.263007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384519800","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4512485","title":"Later-Life Mortality and the Repeal of Federal Prohibition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02365486542258022,"score_gpt":0.2987848979491577,"score_spread":0.2751300325265775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384519800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9555771,0.0007933227,0.00016126306,0.019591779,0.000322288,0.000015502475,0.0010955821,0.000013945558,0.022429263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925587,0.00016385823,0.00003739229,0.0015648509,0.00020965545,0.000012199966,0.00028458427,0.0000039989463,0.005164816],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981294,0.0003773383,0.00007240343,0.000117483374,0.00019428213,0.0011090435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99313414,0.0019155568,0.002196426,0.00043258007,0.0009557077,0.001365608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030787808,0.0001098155,0.00030886382,0.0007539173,0.0025234637,0.0013963751,0.0009906093,0.0022660173,0.005323308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014227286,0.00013936179,0.00041596818,0.0007138831,0.0010834391,0.0006207888,0.0011653617,0.0031931612,0.0003906629],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015546919,0.00090763066,0.8600274,0.0001282081,0.00024139551,0.0012352315,0.005344458,0.0010271013,0.0014814255,0.059515048,0.027199496,0.041337986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029084962,0.00019261744,0.97322196,0.000075199016,0.000053319407,0.000095631214,0.0023309037,0.00026416537,0.000749885,0.0015093174,0.0214586,0.000019216654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069841735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13514219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069841735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026532337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030035076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13887042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384786352","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4501316","title":"Later-life Mortality and the Repeal of Federal Prohibition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02365486542258022,"score_gpt":0.2987848979491577,"score_spread":0.2751300325265775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384786352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9555771,0.0007933227,0.00016126306,0.019591779,0.000322288,0.000015502475,0.0010955821,0.000013945558,0.022429263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925587,0.00016385823,0.00003739229,0.0015648509,0.00020965545,0.000012199966,0.00028458427,0.0000039989463,0.005164816],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981294,0.0003773383,0.00007240343,0.000117483374,0.00019428213,0.0011090435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99313414,0.0019155568,0.002196426,0.00043258007,0.0009557077,0.001365608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030787808,0.0001098155,0.00030886382,0.0007539173,0.0025234637,0.0013963751,0.0009906093,0.0022660173,0.005323308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014227286,0.00013936179,0.00041596818,0.0007138831,0.0010834391,0.0006207888,0.0011653617,0.0031931612,0.0003906629],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015546919,0.00090763066,0.8600274,0.0001282081,0.00024139551,0.0012352315,0.005344458,0.0010271013,0.0014814255,0.059515048,0.027199496,0.041337986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029084962,0.00019261744,0.97322196,0.000075199016,0.000053319407,0.000095631214,0.0023309037,0.00026416537,0.000749885,0.0015093174,0.0214586,0.000019216654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069841735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13514219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069841735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026532337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030035076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13887042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385210955","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2023.16858abstract","title":"A Pay Raise, with a Bonus Cut: The Unintended Effects of Interventions to Close the Gender Pay Gap","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Gender pay gap; Psychological intervention; Unintended consequences; Gender gap; Business; Labour economics; Public economics; Economics; Psychology; Demographic economics; Political science; Wage; Law","score_opus":0.040458523964820726,"score_gpt":0.319026825756438,"score_spread":0.27856830179161723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385210955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8971948,0.0050299126,0.004449491,0.050327126,0.0016152499,0.00031641076,0.0007418283,0.00014995865,0.040175207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829814,0.0006262368,0.0016111776,0.010779214,0.0002559753,0.00023435465,0.00007455411,0.000022651016,0.003414443],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98426014,0.010832607,0.00043935847,0.00065037713,0.0021095283,0.0017079554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95062554,0.029634194,0.011985962,0.0027169434,0.0018565088,0.0031808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015030665,0.0004039218,0.00053140934,0.0009214697,0.0019693673,0.0015742922,0.0011137553,0.002199929,0.00978044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058932733,0.00026346004,0.000645088,0.00071217684,0.0020615149,0.0014626636,0.0028964202,0.0026345942,0.00093041227],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004115856,0.004781854,0.23544726,0.00084520236,0.00073789,0.00093776465,0.0092238635,0.0027097727,0.0016441261,0.040998157,0.036148455,0.6624098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083566096,0.008164944,0.8107283,0.0038278417,0.00067626557,0.00080813013,0.022855507,0.005398729,0.0041438323,0.053368494,0.08901496,0.00017737187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034970122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057780985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015030665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016048332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002515594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07949072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385224113","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4519213","title":"Later-Life Mortality and the Repeal of Federal Prohibition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National University of Singapore","keywords":"Repeal; Law; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.02365486542258022,"score_gpt":0.2987848979491577,"score_spread":0.2751300325265775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385224113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9555771,0.0007933227,0.00016126306,0.019591779,0.000322288,0.000015502475,0.0010955821,0.000013945558,0.022429263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925587,0.00016385823,0.00003739229,0.0015648509,0.00020965545,0.000012199966,0.00028458427,0.0000039989463,0.005164816],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981294,0.0003773383,0.00007240343,0.000117483374,0.00019428213,0.0011090435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99313414,0.0019155568,0.002196426,0.00043258007,0.0009557077,0.001365608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030787808,0.0001098155,0.00030886382,0.0007539173,0.0025234637,0.0013963751,0.0009906093,0.0022660173,0.005323308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014227286,0.00013936179,0.00041596818,0.0007138831,0.0010834391,0.0006207888,0.0011653617,0.0031931612,0.0003906629],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015546919,0.00090763066,0.8600274,0.0001282081,0.00024139551,0.0012352315,0.005344458,0.0010271013,0.0014814255,0.059515048,0.027199496,0.041337986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029084962,0.00019261744,0.97322196,0.000075199016,0.000053319407,0.000095631214,0.0023309037,0.00026416537,0.000749885,0.0015093174,0.0214586,0.000019216654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069841735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13514219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069841735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026532337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030035076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13887042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385421073","doi":"10.3390/healthcare11152165","title":"Women Agro-Entrepreneurship Promoting Vegetables at a Family Level: A Healthcare Approach towards Non-Communicable Disease Risk Reduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Business; Focus group; Entrepreneurship; Health care; Citizen journalism; Production (economics); Environmental health; Participatory action research; Qualitative research; Non-communicable disease; Public health; Economic growth; Marketing; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.09561171372729604,"score_gpt":0.3270346610965143,"score_spread":0.23142294736921826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385421073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5057863,0.026419127,0.015290625,0.29890096,0.0015384011,0.0006189058,0.00017560783,0.00012280054,0.15114728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626892,0.010510318,0.0046763383,0.009137603,0.00016070275,0.00017787496,0.00002757532,0.000011381049,0.012609003],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989785,0.0007020976,0.000019058198,0.00006777356,0.000051042283,0.00018145953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927014,0.00020727381,0.00008253169,0.000022783785,0.000059407717,0.00035780796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002034571,0.00028032454,0.00018781229,0.0003597087,0.0022978396,0.0021271028,0.00053115387,0.0010852644,0.0056265984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016679951,0.00014659851,0.00020820742,0.00035577492,0.0019438788,0.0014887636,0.0028523984,0.001013235,0.0006267124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032492133,0.00093111367,0.07350681,0.0031749748,0.00009761831,0.00439502,0.27378625,0.00024748078,0.009065124,0.045014225,0.03580218,0.55365425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001066275,0.0011575607,0.034834784,0.0028706247,0.00010947207,0.0022054994,0.38317755,0.00027725598,0.0021361457,0.031834237,0.5412315,0.00005872233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020505134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004540554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056265984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010528222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034341817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01882279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385443861","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4527338","title":"Educated Couples’ Location Choice and Intra-Household Bargaining","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.021364661549282887,"score_gpt":0.2834610621983929,"score_spread":0.26209640064911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385443861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99381775,0.000082033235,0.00019364904,0.00016494699,0.0000035261992,0.000003023205,0.000026860685,9.461491e-7,0.005707248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987118,0.000023113993,0.000022982591,0.000010626288,0.0000013251147,9.2797825e-7,0.000008996938,4.4189977e-7,0.001219712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999635,0.00018595518,0.000011580533,0.0000295158,0.000028000433,0.00010995857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982339,0.00097031833,0.0003701637,0.00006129679,0.00007058738,0.00029371804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011036682,0.0000934838,0.00016364889,0.0004163486,0.00088377646,0.0016605487,0.00021605012,0.00055423897,0.015977291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004051001,0.00014233816,0.0001173355,0.00053317065,0.0006369238,0.00081664784,0.00076429313,0.0005261214,0.0006941457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001197921,0.0006643654,0.90438455,0.000042092044,0.00008313023,0.0010789724,0.024371613,0.0018279811,0.0014610493,0.022741448,0.00068762543,0.0414592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007558703,0.00046400135,0.85773134,0.00005773464,0.00006287839,0.00047926392,0.11787587,0.003236033,0.00075046846,0.014431769,0.004801844,0.00003329547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005773857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009737915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015977291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034364266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002461223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053449392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385449643","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.2023-br01","title":"Lamb, Sarah. <b><i>Being Single in India: Stories of Gender, Exclusion, and Possibility</i></b>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.12304248790488599,"score_gpt":0.3811822330741647,"score_spread":0.25813974516927873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385449643","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016529022,0.05706992,0.00025841058,0.85083073,0.007864598,0.000027777702,0.00043180276,0.00007056365,0.06691719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39787745,0.058036055,0.00058574585,0.37419114,0.0036050861,0.00022721505,0.00023581492,0.00025872566,0.16498284],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995347,0.00026027844,0.000014074063,0.000029071169,0.00006424606,0.00009762546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975647,0.0013204339,0.0001455262,0.00006238005,0.0003159707,0.0005910242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087134243,0.00043804583,0.00030359506,0.0007298451,0.012557082,0.0034273183,0.0010728611,0.005167194,0.011962259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002735594,0.0005722648,0.00029416714,0.0013128457,0.004898093,0.005197843,0.0026993412,0.010946215,0.0019384263],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055621607,0.000020909707,0.0011002036,0.00019213672,0.000011965072,0.0008604067,0.16167776,0.000030870877,0.00020879887,0.012130377,0.8085469,0.0151640475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009585027,0.000017983499,0.0060062855,0.00052324287,0.000010214511,0.00063407165,0.36315688,0.000019499506,0.00010969493,0.003302588,0.6261888,0.00002112445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08134224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18653125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08134224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001708522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024662039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16173756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385462060","doi":"10.3390/women3030030","title":"Factors Influencing Post-Marriage Education and Employment among Bangladeshi Women: A Cross-Sectional Analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Empowerment; Demography; Cross-sectional study; Logistic regression; Inequality; Toilet; Educational attainment; Higher education; Age at first marriage; Medicine; Socioeconomics; Gerontology; Psychology; Geography; Economic growth; Population; Sociology; Fertility; Economics","score_opus":0.021191963650227196,"score_gpt":0.30525625137295875,"score_spread":0.28406428772273157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385462060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984977,0.00029389234,0.000047292382,0.00006503206,0.0000036312042,0.000025051751,0.0004765001,0.0000010059401,0.0005898413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987124,0.0003600121,0.00010021755,0.00006517065,0.0000063891457,0.00004183542,0.00035702114,0.0000010631742,0.00035578714],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997011,0.000071454124,0.000049626597,0.000053829517,0.000060808532,0.00006324595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994236,0.00012760652,0.00020151514,0.000039351766,0.00009219078,0.0001157129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007132048,0.00020234677,0.00030176697,0.00053011475,0.00055784604,0.00043796396,0.00025251924,0.00046986513,0.002265213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012476887,0.00042173127,0.00040629375,0.0010084978,0.000237994,0.00050092186,0.0005371883,0.0005916641,0.0004631781],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023943307,0.00006412879,0.997776,0.00003110233,0.000028033463,0.0000573665,0.0005982668,0.000012213007,0.00013634635,0.000014091863,0.00007059599,0.0011879214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026756297,0.00015745021,0.99707544,0.000025301872,0.000023551507,0.00015281599,0.0020832464,0.000050021994,0.000023141729,0.00001307408,0.0003886499,0.000004604945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00637925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010746193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00637925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024049445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026529477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012684226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385594121","doi":"10.59962/9780774836395-011","title":"Canada, the United Kingdom, and Patriation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; Political science; History; Geography; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.026885861854707368,"score_gpt":0.20609704141067775,"score_spread":0.17921117955597038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385594121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004675552,0.092910066,0.00011530487,0.011364842,0.0011051474,0.000018091585,0.0002266813,0.000032252905,0.889552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10589898,0.047672037,0.00025356386,0.0027233623,0.00020318603,0.000030189447,0.0001255529,0.000078154015,0.843015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993292,0.00006562153,0.00001374369,0.000066081986,0.00022081466,0.0003045705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961865,0.00007003089,0.000017090304,0.000020753632,0.00017286639,0.000100584475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003538236,0.0006435255,0.00050328136,0.0015785318,0.014806024,0.0086341025,0.00080295035,0.002288007,0.03399549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013854785,0.0004229038,0.00019343363,0.0049512736,0.007333414,0.002337787,0.0017081862,0.0035815854,0.0029694778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044586333,0.000018151779,0.00086857873,0.00017085168,0.000008816125,0.00025994296,0.013672402,0.0001410825,0.00008366191,0.56158423,0.33729115,0.085856564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003405635,0.0000025665438,0.0015079569,0.00024671128,0.0000040130667,0.000047806367,0.0041936194,0.000023054108,0.000027079592,0.0056415014,0.98829424,0.000008146307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9691947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05579721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05579721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.071069054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40483898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385599803","doi":"10.59962/9780774828635","title":"Patriation and Its Consequences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.02636222953136908,"score_gpt":0.2173143917115434,"score_spread":0.19095216218017433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385599803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0647513,0.00837755,0.000788349,0.038752474,0.00056887936,0.000028894401,0.00007142484,0.00004355541,0.88661754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8993401,0.0042094314,0.00022221167,0.005177894,0.00013524338,0.000023000726,0.000037986578,0.000055963847,0.0907982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642307,0.00063102384,0.00004281917,0.00032968225,0.0010748063,0.0014986679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999014,0.00023028244,0.00006443429,0.000117658834,0.0003864037,0.00018708177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002213419,0.00035367114,0.00033191056,0.0011222503,0.03157838,0.010289496,0.001162752,0.002370485,0.0057864343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004079281,0.00029055946,0.000353941,0.0021708081,0.059335005,0.0029711232,0.004682389,0.0060533746,0.00058254483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012059569,0.000008269053,0.0007223462,0.000019384643,0.0000045742718,0.0005256411,0.040990476,0.00016077064,0.00011690948,0.9244952,0.021187216,0.0117571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001266543,0.000016384285,0.006050614,0.0002573251,0.000014457632,0.000549065,0.04915991,0.00024102812,0.0002821736,0.10075924,0.8426106,0.000046618206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8443315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8628748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8443315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067236006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06806274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48783368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385651509","doi":"10.4054/demres.2023.49.8","title":"Women’s employment trajectories in a low-income setting: Stratification and change in Nepal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demographic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Stratification (seeds); Low income; Demographic economics; Economics; Socioeconomics; Geography; Development economics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.09605083574743309,"score_gpt":0.38802525402418725,"score_spread":0.2919744182767542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385651509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982065,0.00026528185,0.000079845304,0.0004899839,0.000008192807,0.000016189859,0.00019568828,0.000002593999,0.0007357196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990269,0.00025344177,0.00011525163,0.00010674903,0.0000034598593,0.000032547363,0.00018645133,0.0000021272726,0.00027313526],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999537,0.000140408,0.000034016575,0.00008075451,0.00004574428,0.00016210722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926966,0.00012921571,0.00023231274,0.00003364332,0.0001241999,0.00021095567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007858022,0.00014289751,0.00021329634,0.0010474739,0.0021064116,0.0018263193,0.00069737184,0.00048503675,0.001409722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025083309,0.00025267748,0.00027153155,0.0017514027,0.00093082804,0.0016004812,0.0024152522,0.0008572874,0.00024382099],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056874465,0.000066069224,0.94310236,0.00005069884,0.000027764274,0.00041015435,0.04457913,0.000056198784,0.0002674903,0.0004734743,0.0006637518,0.01024598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028970667,0.00005818298,0.9234108,0.00010048066,0.000008594817,0.0002063978,0.07382936,0.00022305455,0.000071337265,0.00037158816,0.0017016871,0.000015736403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060134225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09733607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060134225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001618703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001724881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11956841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385745229","doi":"10.59962/9780774821940-010","title":"The Disappearance of Parents from Children’s Lives: The Cumulative Effects of Child Care, Child Custody, and Child Welfare Policies in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Child care; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Medicine; Pediatrics; Law","score_opus":0.006524001708145158,"score_gpt":0.1744807322512625,"score_spread":0.16795673054311736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385745229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61408496,0.07653197,0.0004788273,0.10676673,0.000808351,0.000051460716,0.0016846332,0.000043603603,0.19954945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94043314,0.025222862,0.0002465762,0.002408489,0.00007023314,0.000022959559,0.0002567197,0.00004313227,0.031295948],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741983,0.00035798256,0.00003522486,0.00017431924,0.0007216043,0.0012910683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699724,0.0005369153,0.00020317335,0.000079950834,0.0010637647,0.0011190586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016904532,0.00034110766,0.0007286123,0.0014858093,0.028230214,0.008509118,0.0021611473,0.001625487,0.006713682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041248007,0.0004842484,0.0005014706,0.0051448243,0.009908429,0.002406088,0.0036819729,0.0040503927,0.00020925527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002848882,0.0001716841,0.117425285,0.00032150763,0.00012280227,0.0015459573,0.33662242,0.0016576601,0.00059381407,0.22025448,0.13879694,0.18220265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034096018,0.000048780144,0.2806222,0.0008666069,0.00013478962,0.00032419848,0.40951455,0.0006224726,0.00041119236,0.009187075,0.2981067,0.00012747273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1807625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1807625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3273558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95019937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385747087","doi":"10.59962/9780774816328-013","title":"Of Scalar Hierarchies and Welfare Redesign: Child Care in Four Canadian Cities","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Scalar (mathematics); Continuum of care; Sociology; Economics; Economic growth; Mathematics; Health care; Market economy; Geometry","score_opus":0.011315419368368218,"score_gpt":0.17985248889654673,"score_spread":0.1685370695281785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385747087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66811204,0.00834983,0.0012129558,0.028876862,0.00028593096,0.00013198284,0.0010378008,0.000073120944,0.29191944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355841,0.0026365297,0.0010108219,0.0007711843,0.000016277667,0.00004320924,0.00021278657,0.000041524716,0.05968357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847037,0.00027512305,0.000021643202,0.00008761393,0.00027967984,0.0008655456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899715,0.00010283953,0.0000646976,0.00004175176,0.000337229,0.00045638572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008291067,0.00033064914,0.00029686964,0.0015584774,0.021319384,0.006348372,0.0019793164,0.0010861037,0.008836314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016403783,0.00034414462,0.00030431434,0.005723538,0.008358612,0.0015383456,0.0037627371,0.0022440057,0.00026768053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012106827,0.00015297094,0.052568153,0.00019057396,0.000031165637,0.0006090143,0.26469052,0.0020110654,0.000569098,0.3964223,0.107080996,0.17555313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026913805,0.00003875019,0.19966897,0.0003167324,0.00003416136,0.000121037716,0.40684712,0.000990284,0.00028533238,0.0106214695,0.38096413,0.000085118285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14521329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14521329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17944443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385771440","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4538028","title":"When Women's Work Disappears: Marriage and Fertility Decisions in Peru","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Economics; Competition (biology); Demographic economics; China; Marriage market; Consumption (sociology); Liberalization; Labour economics; Demography; Population; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.016161031222161646,"score_gpt":0.2777284648091973,"score_spread":0.2615674335870356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385771440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99736565,0.0002882427,0.000020718215,0.00062267616,0.0000030276794,0.0000037829575,0.00007638909,0.0000015607558,0.0016180513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876547,0.00020827353,0.000012324704,0.00005216093,0.000005621455,0.0000051181787,0.000065195505,0.0000010917327,0.0008847503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994294,0.00026868389,0.000014288629,0.000040316023,0.000026229083,0.0002210005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781966,0.0009649806,0.00055649463,0.000055310476,0.00013956253,0.0004640413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012277242,0.00010880723,0.00028046328,0.0006678171,0.0015428109,0.001510609,0.0005651275,0.0009851673,0.005628904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005089768,0.0002181029,0.00025993006,0.00096965634,0.0011376451,0.0010425821,0.0020618956,0.0010498101,0.00039709496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006479336,0.0003700957,0.93959516,0.0000694993,0.00006054101,0.001004775,0.04226044,0.00023444032,0.0005375012,0.0022531622,0.0007950218,0.012171363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025916526,0.0002373767,0.8988332,0.00005261615,0.00003765248,0.00018577138,0.09594637,0.00029729304,0.00017737843,0.0005672273,0.0036274083,0.000011675167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036074232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07027395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036074232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094220875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008884608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07172847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385855121","doi":"10.1515/jgd-2023-0012","title":"When Women’s Work Disappears: Marriage and Fertility Decisions in Peru","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Globalization and Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Fertility; Competition (biology); Demographic economics; China; Consumption (sociology); Marriage market; Liberalization; Labour economics; Total fertility rate; Population; Family planning; Research methodology; Demography; Market economy; Geography","score_opus":0.02827342598881736,"score_gpt":0.2941686500609365,"score_spread":0.26589522407211913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385855121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998466,0.00022249472,0.00003948743,0.00021513103,0.0000019386023,0.0000028881343,0.00012659715,0.0000017818445,0.0009237862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99918205,0.00017897756,0.000019193238,0.000022879494,0.0000035241035,0.0000038067487,0.00010888549,7.3062324e-7,0.00047994035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996679,0.00017019617,0.000010513224,0.000039572988,0.000022122858,0.00008969735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847454,0.00050612184,0.0006730777,0.00005964756,0.00008411317,0.00020243271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081534806,0.000092418486,0.00020211132,0.00043727667,0.00058026036,0.00072874594,0.00030773543,0.0004031092,0.0041002156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003125942,0.00016659478,0.00024533767,0.00075463107,0.00045658305,0.00044604528,0.000980876,0.0004980901,0.0003043944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001389167,0.00011152152,0.9878,0.00002358875,0.000049115093,0.00028856387,0.004202892,0.00021943863,0.0002048835,0.00037999073,0.00032155358,0.0062594074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006863568,0.000110461064,0.9891739,0.000020285117,0.000017250515,0.00010193682,0.008780736,0.00034257755,0.00009455915,0.00019833336,0.0011482212,0.000004972727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018873774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028233672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018873774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045104808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026955572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03752786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385855361","doi":"10.59962/9780774818155","title":"The Business of Women","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.01611884180983349,"score_gpt":0.18842362122045922,"score_spread":0.17230477941062572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385855361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005070738,0.044406783,0.001101731,0.030760752,0.0020076886,0.000038078968,0.00009304197,0.00009438621,0.9164268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057021428,0.01774609,0.0006613513,0.005888952,0.00043159278,0.000050162726,0.000046745838,0.00008198666,0.9180716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892336,0.00029433126,0.000020618427,0.00014931853,0.00030459758,0.00030771582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994485,0.00010708209,0.000035210232,0.000070252005,0.00012378422,0.00021515365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009956103,0.0006221045,0.0003847466,0.00080215844,0.011145773,0.0082688285,0.0008187457,0.0019892117,0.022884073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013070997,0.00026634656,0.00018844943,0.0013895121,0.011213647,0.0046928497,0.003610489,0.0026434022,0.007936823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022938344,0.00001869989,0.00072820013,0.00010090437,0.0000037666732,0.00023600322,0.034329362,0.00005192715,0.0002195617,0.56989616,0.29447857,0.09991396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.4430193e-7,0.0000027255544,0.00016271057,0.00007952607,6.7275175e-7,0.000048955266,0.0032588078,0.0000068852473,0.000021482003,0.00484495,0.99157083,0.0000016644383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07047418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12394549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07047418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007358542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012062306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14012796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385868492","doi":"10.59962/9780774850513-010","title":"Hammering Their Way through the Barriers: Low-Income Women Retrain to Be Carpenters","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Labour economics; Low income; Economics","score_opus":0.025215760825512842,"score_gpt":0.21678362326238304,"score_spread":0.19156786243687018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385868492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8396141,0.0047486755,0.00046277652,0.1134033,0.0018522762,0.0002265097,0.000102762024,0.00013480557,0.039454747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91982853,0.005745324,0.00088858325,0.04260307,0.00028655643,0.0002733832,0.00010544868,0.00010973318,0.030159524],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977451,0.00062651624,0.00005642535,0.00009266947,0.00022666107,0.0012526149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974165,0.0002821996,0.00022355377,0.000051844116,0.00025188504,0.0017740565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021128494,0.00053892174,0.00066781044,0.00086034957,0.020217678,0.004495206,0.0020109678,0.0029406475,0.008305172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043862457,0.00076792185,0.00038689605,0.0009829126,0.004878658,0.004093628,0.006925865,0.0067724544,0.0012526893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009250085,0.0007356053,0.039811824,0.0004519662,0.00003195537,0.008482756,0.77393436,0.000046352317,0.0017982466,0.0032925422,0.089626186,0.081695706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015088791,0.00012557246,0.011975743,0.00031914763,0.000011902899,0.0009572639,0.94428086,0.000031685053,0.000102529244,0.0005726814,0.04157431,0.0000331176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07256675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21116927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92743325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046727564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012593525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14428872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386037823","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4544583","title":"When Women's Work Disappears: Marriage and Fertility Decisions in Peru","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Psychology; Demography; Gender studies; Economics; Sociology; Population; Physics","score_opus":0.016161031222161646,"score_gpt":0.2777284648091973,"score_spread":0.2615674335870356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386037823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99736565,0.0002882427,0.000020718215,0.00062267616,0.0000030276794,0.0000037829575,0.00007638909,0.0000015607558,0.0016180513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876547,0.00020827353,0.000012324704,0.00005216093,0.000005621455,0.0000051181787,0.000065195505,0.0000010917327,0.0008847503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994294,0.00026868389,0.000014288629,0.000040316023,0.000026229083,0.0002210005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781966,0.0009649806,0.00055649463,0.000055310476,0.00013956253,0.0004640413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012277242,0.00010880723,0.00028046328,0.0006678171,0.0015428109,0.001510609,0.0005651275,0.0009851673,0.005628904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005089768,0.0002181029,0.00025993006,0.00096965634,0.0011376451,0.0010425821,0.0020618956,0.0010498101,0.00039709496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006479336,0.0003700957,0.93959516,0.0000694993,0.00006054101,0.001004775,0.04226044,0.00023444032,0.0005375012,0.0022531622,0.0007950218,0.012171363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025916526,0.0002373767,0.8988332,0.00005261615,0.00003765248,0.00018577138,0.09594637,0.00029729304,0.00017737843,0.0005672273,0.0036274083,0.000011675167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036074232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07027395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036074232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094220875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008884608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07172847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386263126","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4539457","title":"Just Transition as Wellbeing: A Capability Approach Framing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Transition (genetics); Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Chemistry; Engineering","score_opus":0.018299360446002413,"score_gpt":0.2800341500038976,"score_spread":0.2617347895578952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386263126","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044772234,0.009481245,0.0973872,0.35064724,0.0026629753,0.00013021796,0.00025366148,0.00007307806,0.4945922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970712,0.0025664726,0.007023044,0.0072633172,0.0015154007,0.00020208867,0.000053670206,0.000077008095,0.010586948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967038,0.002022103,0.00009292585,0.0004144307,0.0002594099,0.0005074056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99450123,0.0034785778,0.00036876727,0.00038722437,0.00053491874,0.0007291732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005833243,0.0009856593,0.00067756063,0.0028011536,0.005816843,0.0110599445,0.002193452,0.007246942,0.006834557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062228604,0.00041566312,0.000684885,0.0026720287,0.045680765,0.017551344,0.0055225124,0.009061162,0.00039440845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031182767,0.0000040620143,0.0000660074,0.0000066765447,0.0000013868486,0.00002504121,0.0019897574,0.000051127547,0.000010897939,0.99673647,0.00048625158,0.00061925134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000839659,0.000009699058,0.0002597969,0.0000787058,0.0000075700837,0.000052634714,0.0058683786,0.00042697578,0.00004493263,0.9748752,0.018357545,0.000010188458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009271745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008851642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0110599445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006648736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004601779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048240185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386336461","doi":"10.1016/bs.hefam.2023.01.007","title":"An institutional perspective on the economics of the family","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Handbook of the economics of the family","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Property (philosophy); Positive economics; Variation (astronomy); Epistemology; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.039264364951607185,"score_gpt":0.2514657314632321,"score_spread":0.2122013665116249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386336461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006429094,0.06565825,0.009683898,0.02205005,0.00064095337,0.000018828663,0.00016015815,0.00003381511,0.8953251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59238684,0.10993709,0.006637682,0.0049232016,0.0026231317,0.00015997005,0.0001238553,0.000076812605,0.28313148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969065,0.00017491452,0.000005834383,0.000020993675,0.00006854416,0.000039120747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994918,0.00036078956,0.000026301106,0.000029681403,0.0000592855,0.00003207786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052841316,0.0003668986,0.00029908292,0.000832731,0.0010333266,0.0024380751,0.000601364,0.0011167784,0.012527472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010910825,0.00017388088,0.00018783753,0.0015251,0.0040655727,0.0023374308,0.000541906,0.0015473489,0.0010957886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024360445,0.0000100859215,0.000042042793,0.000009495254,8.196501e-7,0.000013383292,0.00010125209,0.0002743598,0.000016244643,0.9873904,0.007859859,0.004279669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004070254,0.000008153696,0.00042111802,0.00013941816,0.0000020906582,0.00006394324,0.0005187015,0.00041886984,0.000041496754,0.8403812,0.15799655,0.000004470883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005140572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054120156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012527472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026497205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021554467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041908562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386367288","doi":"10.3102/ip.23.2013224","title":"Families and Feminisms: Exploring Shifting Gender Identities and Feminisms Through Daughter-Mother Relationships","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Daughter; Gender studies; Sociology; Gender identity; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.1747221413130342,"score_gpt":0.3211134407851477,"score_spread":0.1463912994721135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386367288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96447146,0.0005163154,0.00067852525,0.0013437171,0.000023964947,0.000011448819,0.000038195976,0.000005000565,0.032911405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971167,0.00019584446,0.00013863567,0.0000575195,0.0000036478427,0.000010869177,0.0000073564806,0.000004094732,0.002465383],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880254,0.00084825,0.00001411912,0.00007866921,0.00007766309,0.00017872948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822074,0.0011766636,0.00022163858,0.000063675776,0.00009373766,0.00022349154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023905083,0.0002683848,0.0002201802,0.0008142184,0.006701352,0.004388095,0.0006890676,0.00063541165,0.0067467242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004648403,0.00016872819,0.00012719067,0.00055850495,0.0067713414,0.0039691865,0.0035071229,0.001045466,0.00021908873],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012132606,0.00008580379,0.03402568,0.00004289382,0.000006456357,0.00061837496,0.9182976,0.000050651135,0.00086743885,0.029326264,0.0006993774,0.01585821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069476855,0.00003173863,0.019709878,0.000061605264,0.000005910251,0.00022686264,0.964411,0.000075334356,0.00034624108,0.0041241385,0.0109930085,0.000007306292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0098674735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020225514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0098674735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022531257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021715683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022570074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386548856","doi":"10.1177/23780231231192392","title":"The Effects of Head Start on Low-Income Mothers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Head start; Early Head Start; Low income; Head (geology); Psychology; Demographic economics; Developmental psychology; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.09373043711267107,"score_gpt":0.4382609919975771,"score_spread":0.344530554884906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386548856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970048,0.00036509937,0.000024159655,0.0004889723,0.000018094055,0.000009239213,0.000097557386,0.000004098179,0.001988043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981336,0.00042404895,0.00009376613,0.00014637776,0.0000141100945,0.000018312869,0.00004751238,0.0000014919376,0.001120894],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999496,0.0003229786,0.000009705362,0.000025889482,0.000049292215,0.00009618163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997156,0.0017876016,0.00041699817,0.00011070801,0.00011787661,0.0004107312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077664887,0.00018811769,0.00018819232,0.0001780812,0.00039680305,0.000263822,0.00024653142,0.00040652812,0.004097177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004165111,0.00007889609,0.00037116813,0.00013011393,0.00024838184,0.00017199414,0.00042936747,0.00039124282,0.00020978626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013387686,0.0076134764,0.7370451,0.00033959694,0.0006675728,0.0012569067,0.0033496963,0.0007705032,0.0056482297,0.0016275643,0.0062229885,0.22207083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031044334,0.008778791,0.98096025,0.0001449078,0.00039573162,0.00012829441,0.0025933085,0.00039774526,0.002938092,0.0004635011,0.002876003,0.000012939778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085732285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013884362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0085732285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062006264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048589654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01704669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386641255","doi":"10.54254/2754-1169/18/20230068","title":"Comparing the Efficiency of Gender Policy in Canada and the United States by the Female Employment Rate","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Demographic economics; Political science; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.026606144421581397,"score_gpt":0.2935609405208799,"score_spread":0.2669547960992985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386641255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9670504,0.0017757199,0.00039384572,0.0035955366,0.00003629026,0.000036617676,0.002770928,0.00003318249,0.024307432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99376935,0.0008420086,0.00024112656,0.00023733279,0.00000843148,0.000008938124,0.00087912934,0.0000106420575,0.004003129],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711084,0.00034280634,0.000086922766,0.00018809029,0.0010667057,0.0012045995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99392056,0.0009142432,0.00085534825,0.00019310712,0.003387895,0.000728843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023156,0.00017838847,0.0003622031,0.0021468543,0.0022084424,0.001964353,0.00070485286,0.00036097804,0.0013731754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009992019,0.00015127342,0.00040175288,0.0037068108,0.0011090148,0.00042983287,0.0008710946,0.00059362804,0.00012336198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037076944,0.00006204907,0.9126219,0.00008320618,0.00017633235,0.00019016897,0.0026933476,0.008406575,0.00061929924,0.017347524,0.009170901,0.048257872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001441947,0.000029584797,0.979185,0.0000529795,0.00004412833,0.00002980245,0.0040801587,0.0027189592,0.00069602235,0.0003590233,0.01276161,0.000028431243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99626356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048202403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048202403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058274623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34973454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386699039","doi":"10.32920/24134964.v1","title":"Women’s Work in India: Evidence from changes in time use between 1998 and 2019","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Caste; Work hours; Leisure time; Paid work; Demographic economics; Psychology; Demography; Sociology; Working hours; Economics; Political science; Labour economics; Medicine; Physical activity","score_opus":0.07423840442741336,"score_gpt":0.3052089318152091,"score_spread":0.23097052738779572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386699039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849571,0.0015999486,0.00008331222,0.0005723004,0.000052775522,0.000011381106,0.008516889,0.000012654149,0.004193639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953734,0.0009496709,0.00005992856,0.00012505452,0.000025083855,0.000017821296,0.0028448629,0.0000061332257,0.000598108],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990447,0.00018148056,0.000113129514,0.00017223133,0.00019604976,0.0002923516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99614066,0.0007992619,0.0017831326,0.0002672074,0.0006042632,0.00040539462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007468673,0.0002679006,0.00027370834,0.002635632,0.00081468135,0.0012338802,0.00083253667,0.00035726564,0.0021805242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028328097,0.00034807058,0.0007048687,0.007701023,0.00079336425,0.00055899256,0.0013125419,0.00069356745,0.000607029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008406265,0.000026463598,0.9923705,0.000115024566,0.000096177224,0.00007747058,0.001637351,0.000036365418,0.00005759162,0.00007431546,0.00092939165,0.004495308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010106417,0.00001316086,0.9982572,0.00002155642,0.00001914748,0.000025425188,0.0011408775,0.000009656702,0.000021451051,0.000007123245,0.00048017522,0.0000031799023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13355453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19363996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13355453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096229004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009014008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2655543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386699169","doi":"10.32920/24134964","title":"Women’s Work in India: Evidence from changes in time use between 1998 and 2019","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Leisure time; Work hours; Caste; Paid work; Demographic economics; Psychology; Demography; Working hours; Economics; Sociology; Labour economics; Political science; Physical activity; Medicine","score_opus":0.07423840442741336,"score_gpt":0.3052089318152091,"score_spread":0.23097052738779572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386699169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849571,0.0015999486,0.00008331222,0.0005723004,0.000052775522,0.000011381106,0.008516889,0.000012654149,0.004193639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953734,0.0009496709,0.00005992856,0.00012505452,0.000025083855,0.000017821296,0.0028448629,0.0000061332257,0.000598108],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990447,0.00018148056,0.000113129514,0.00017223133,0.00019604976,0.0002923516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99614066,0.0007992619,0.0017831326,0.0002672074,0.0006042632,0.00040539462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007468673,0.0002679006,0.00027370834,0.002635632,0.00081468135,0.0012338802,0.00083253667,0.00035726564,0.0021805242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028328097,0.00034807058,0.0007048687,0.007701023,0.00079336425,0.00055899256,0.0013125419,0.00069356745,0.000607029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008406265,0.000026463598,0.9923705,0.000115024566,0.000096177224,0.00007747058,0.001637351,0.000036365418,0.00005759162,0.00007431546,0.00092939165,0.004495308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010106417,0.00001316086,0.9982572,0.00002155642,0.00001914748,0.000025425188,0.0011408775,0.000009656702,0.000021451051,0.000007123245,0.00048017522,0.0000031799023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13355453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19363996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13355453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096229004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009014008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2655543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386951101","doi":"10.20429/aujh.2023.130206","title":"‘Following the Line of Least Resistance’: African American Women in Domestic Work, 1899–1940","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Armstrong Undergraduate Journal of History","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Subordination (linguistics); Patriarchy; Gender studies; Intersectionality; Resistance (ecology); Capitalism; Race (biology); White (mutation); Sociology; Black women; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.02316363995172625,"score_gpt":0.2700591549979411,"score_spread":0.24689551504621485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386951101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9772095,0.0012521199,0.0001219733,0.009017972,0.00017028212,0.000011253377,0.000023025867,0.000005775697,0.012188022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99247944,0.00094500085,0.000104033745,0.0018683005,0.0000652425,0.000019541658,0.000012998322,0.000010029106,0.00449555],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987802,0.00053049705,0.000019008496,0.000067775625,0.00008720507,0.000515289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939764,0.00018660717,0.000108767614,0.000025838639,0.000081277714,0.00019985976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019481872,0.00029814232,0.0003240825,0.0010505425,0.021943808,0.0033258765,0.0006846185,0.0017076666,0.003339509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031131448,0.00034832105,0.00016156674,0.0009641961,0.010860551,0.0036069483,0.003986687,0.0034515532,0.00037099086],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028808969,0.000024521496,0.0070628677,0.0000183202,0.0000028477393,0.00058331096,0.97834605,0.000009831003,0.0005553299,0.0045114947,0.0020138994,0.006842639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031280888,0.000046453497,0.015599542,0.00008057598,0.0000041048797,0.00050737546,0.9349823,0.000015508935,0.000197212,0.00051640946,0.048032567,0.0000147555775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057037752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08807654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057037752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026858822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029561243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113411486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387066375","doi":"10.1007/978-981-99-5526-8_5","title":"Women Returning to the Family","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Unpaid work; Labour economics; Work (physics); Paid work; Sociology; Care work; Gender studies; Demographic economics; Economics; Working hours; Engineering; Market economy","score_opus":0.04796077099872453,"score_gpt":0.2749011285387209,"score_spread":0.22694035753999636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387066375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019170333,0.026665917,0.0005696519,0.03144628,0.0039856634,0.000043931028,0.000077553705,0.00003226836,0.91800845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16782042,0.019451058,0.00028457976,0.007389149,0.00086117233,0.00006481803,0.000046255856,0.00005565465,0.8040269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993716,0.00026884675,0.000008871803,0.00004536919,0.00007050943,0.00023488107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997538,0.000068509085,0.000017808066,0.00001925748,0.000030818977,0.000109827415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007132446,0.00050287496,0.00036893925,0.00043818925,0.008920379,0.004035296,0.00066473265,0.0015026518,0.038941015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015518737,0.00018085816,0.00024542518,0.0009204938,0.00466913,0.0030993195,0.0025278293,0.0033018887,0.004126819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006274313,0.00008154127,0.0012959563,0.00012765355,0.0000061275746,0.0012380563,0.10986819,0.000095404714,0.00023153418,0.48820627,0.30218187,0.09660472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029063995,0.000015058983,0.0008001996,0.00017236755,0.0000018101438,0.00025718182,0.05250403,0.000011967736,0.000051228988,0.011034407,0.9351447,0.0000041616577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0198518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042887278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038941015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029458222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004190655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13027072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387066408","doi":"10.1007/978-981-99-5526-8_7","title":"Education Equity in Light of Families’ Time Investment in Childcare","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Investment (military); Recreation; Equity (law); Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Family income; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.03159966039917665,"score_gpt":0.311351841525129,"score_spread":0.27975218112595235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387066408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16540238,0.007402061,0.0040006842,0.030681517,0.000377986,0.000017895416,0.00012901817,0.000016374717,0.7919721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641657,0.00087388034,0.00031175214,0.00034385314,0.000099084595,0.000009454082,0.000016468724,0.0000073853635,0.034172434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996884,0.00011464804,0.0000032161229,0.000030054465,0.00003606343,0.00012762644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995141,0.0002665495,0.000039785264,0.000020046251,0.000047892023,0.00011156935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062572164,0.00017616955,0.00016205678,0.00049997,0.0014884073,0.0028230785,0.00034610264,0.00060617045,0.009412407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014623821,0.00007204216,0.00012686726,0.00074738637,0.002694496,0.0022680978,0.001062847,0.0014407797,0.00018408413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023995259,0.000027515842,0.0035956097,0.000010182153,0.0000034731224,0.000093043534,0.0072978805,0.00037197772,0.00010999947,0.9600623,0.0055191917,0.022884818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011537598,0.000047702582,0.04279299,0.00021211189,0.000013557002,0.00021153799,0.046289597,0.001329144,0.0005114811,0.71917915,0.18938766,0.000013587057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0124848895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03460575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0124848895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037132031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015953812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031487644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387162583","doi":"10.2307/jj.7249492.9","title":"A Single Mother Returns to Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.036202426172184235,"score_gpt":0.25157518923669736,"score_spread":0.21537276306451314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387162583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028131215,0.010388493,0.00062129024,0.06961572,0.0039905393,0.00004579264,0.0005345868,0.00010502141,0.88656723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07707678,0.0053167045,0.000389274,0.0054631173,0.00014103735,0.000010490349,0.00007306476,0.000077648365,0.91145194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994134,0.00003370725,0.000007329215,0.00006337916,0.00015121071,0.00033096256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994603,0.000048529004,0.000017812468,0.000019790037,0.0002148636,0.00023877659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048628807,0.00034553226,0.00042523388,0.00057588867,0.019747071,0.0040305424,0.0008903387,0.0018140407,0.042980652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011945331,0.00025106347,0.00028370993,0.0010597233,0.002457674,0.0014721685,0.0016141919,0.0035249775,0.0047728457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005657509,0.000033956727,0.0034408807,0.00007267988,0.000008732034,0.0028121506,0.014348185,0.00012459506,0.00044028024,0.27159122,0.59944826,0.10762245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036338402,0.000009357324,0.0016275316,0.00009933314,0.0000056220324,0.00037486583,0.0133356,0.000050426363,0.00018684333,0.002688878,0.9816036,0.000014181097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97105163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9911232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042980652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03371803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06632061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24464262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387326794","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.12675","title":"The Effect of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Physical and Mental health—Results from the Atlanta Paycheck Plus Experiment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Milbank Quarterly","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University; National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Atlanta; Receipt; Mental health; Earned income tax credit; Earnings; Randomized controlled trial; Medicine; Economics; Tax credit; Public economics; Finance; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.013803452197776296,"score_gpt":0.29275294864991297,"score_spread":0.2789494964521367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387326794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99192315,0.0010988045,0.0005571551,0.00077760644,0.00042979274,0.0024243663,0.0008537913,0.00004895748,0.00188636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870749,0.0009632749,0.00266598,0.0013772778,0.0002836683,0.0043597766,0.00057059794,0.000021774289,0.0026827608],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99449134,0.00410828,0.00024906837,0.0005616485,0.00027597658,0.00031363848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888359,0.0063780285,0.002155407,0.0011273741,0.0004355938,0.0010677318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007404079,0.0010997484,0.0017651452,0.00029509157,0.0006549843,0.0012150054,0.0009911904,0.001947923,0.0075385845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010807677,0.0006470041,0.0020283987,0.00030199866,0.0017621524,0.00094994315,0.0007879148,0.0023607295,0.00064002717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.89874,0.06315123,0.0022919176,0.00135253,0.0017926648,0.00007821369,0.00035801568,0.00083510246,0.0034227185,0.0005703367,0.002578528,0.024828792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.6663589,0.2973108,0.022691114,0.0003980272,0.004490374,0.00004864545,0.00020919024,0.0018068918,0.002250202,0.0011944005,0.0031256054,0.00011589163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063536856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008567374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075385845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010623094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021038945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039156973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387347682","doi":"10.18356/9789210021890c007","title":"Survey data are representative of diversity in commitments and commitment-makers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"United Nations eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Scope (computer science); Accountability; Diversity (politics); Key (lock); Public relations; Political science; Survey data collection; Geography; Statistics; Computer science; Law; Computer security; Mathematics","score_opus":0.22993357258108185,"score_gpt":0.35746295988618776,"score_spread":0.1275293873051059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387347682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8202493,0.0023773694,0.017739747,0.005636418,0.0002947952,0.001006826,0.049237806,0.00022551205,0.10323214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94385535,0.0014785148,0.0049255304,0.0028158014,0.00008443526,0.0016274516,0.032471877,0.000091917085,0.012649187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801103,0.009904644,0.0013369076,0.0014591757,0.005922173,0.0012669067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564354,0.02079355,0.0064791786,0.0053404314,0.009513251,0.0014381687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011572633,0.00023170983,0.00052713614,0.0023770921,0.0009407449,0.0020132707,0.0009006655,0.00056618237,0.010276466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045521405,0.0003315273,0.00026355853,0.005454725,0.000735062,0.0019032377,0.0022106227,0.001187138,0.0033807436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003304155,0.00028713924,0.7531779,0.001156684,0.0002960498,0.00016381152,0.016931215,0.0007875178,0.002342819,0.01096997,0.06991899,0.14363754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021847442,0.00014928337,0.8441054,0.00039519073,0.00004095286,0.0005249465,0.025051389,0.0005836626,0.0010288222,0.006871447,0.12114742,0.00007973648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052349344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01019204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011572633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005836071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011492765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061202645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387623213","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4599649","title":"The Effect of Reducing Welfare Access on Employment, Health, and Children's Long-Run Outcomes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital; Carleton University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Business; Labour economics; Economics; Demographic economics; Public economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.012419586536440156,"score_gpt":0.3218296059764213,"score_spread":0.30941001943998114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387623213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99504554,0.0012546361,0.000041274623,0.0012573911,0.000060126662,0.0000151587665,0.00030824315,0.000005884363,0.0020116107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985512,0.00038421905,0.00004983714,0.0001583146,0.000046495516,0.000015665897,0.000090739784,0.0000015511813,0.0007019981],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858105,0.00049341517,0.0000442204,0.00010232837,0.00008233552,0.00069667184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764484,0.00080213894,0.00046442926,0.00009219483,0.00009067231,0.0009057339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012796128,0.0002619999,0.00040103807,0.00043757525,0.0007162819,0.00084279454,0.0006603156,0.0011132965,0.0077868113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055622314,0.00016370772,0.0011618619,0.0004959463,0.0007152519,0.0006787087,0.0018034813,0.0010254937,0.00017122556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019920977,0.012284925,0.8539539,0.00054208306,0.0019489183,0.0007833656,0.0012481824,0.0032484285,0.0017963973,0.0047325427,0.002782767,0.09675748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006365747,0.006197564,0.9868537,0.00015929599,0.00079680467,0.00012724356,0.0012872758,0.00060425594,0.00046166847,0.0010705539,0.0017863178,0.000018695577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029362852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04532188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029362852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096355466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018682247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058383882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387808636","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2023-015","title":"Child Penalties in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024473651416975772,"score_gpt":0.25377788790292916,"score_spread":0.22930423648595338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387808636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9321123,0.003276885,0.0006814385,0.005574536,0.0002314088,0.00020645799,0.018716045,0.000055234344,0.039145704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95694363,0.0033494532,0.0011595587,0.0013729895,0.000044557717,0.0002650011,0.0067311665,0.0000442388,0.030089375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971149,0.00035206083,0.00013373954,0.00037599704,0.0011511563,0.00087211584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99185383,0.00072439306,0.0016248971,0.00028269322,0.0038557495,0.0016583665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018988593,0.0004066983,0.00061535893,0.001690969,0.004174082,0.0018728613,0.0015621575,0.0005397525,0.006829671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01119197,0.00036865607,0.0005712446,0.005049255,0.000921413,0.00049711845,0.0018432172,0.0011777182,0.0004579581],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094142655,0.00007046832,0.9341433,0.0001521239,0.00010248964,0.00025751544,0.0057015116,0.0005802143,0.00011523659,0.0032309182,0.018605681,0.036946323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001002246,0.000038505586,0.9762708,0.00014202621,0.00003569873,0.00007097022,0.0034892827,0.00035359984,0.000083733874,0.00017165189,0.019310229,0.000023483062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99363315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99733186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040980637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040980637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0829854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2973367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387808652","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2023-006","title":"Two Decades of Poverty Reduction Politics in Canada: Better for Single-Parent Families and Single Working-Age Adults?","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Saskatchewan; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04540251795653851,"score_gpt":0.27055752770894687,"score_spread":0.22515500975240835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387808652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8466958,0.0059599928,0.00025957928,0.08694024,0.00028316226,0.000055819884,0.0013337622,0.000031051353,0.05844068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806113,0.0019003743,0.00019056835,0.0036297082,0.00003573956,0.000022553668,0.00026939856,0.000022306198,0.0133179445],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966054,0.00023061338,0.0000423455,0.00019935991,0.0006019115,0.0023205169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994856,0.0002877234,0.0003904889,0.00013109298,0.0014408194,0.0028937934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014657758,0.0002456534,0.0005912182,0.0013071981,0.019634943,0.006252795,0.0015870135,0.0016478357,0.008645167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040261555,0.00030212192,0.00042788792,0.0031815246,0.005349106,0.002185444,0.0030411123,0.0030308836,0.00033280792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006321928,0.0003314762,0.44452322,0.0003614649,0.00017709915,0.0015264696,0.20799902,0.00085614366,0.001284284,0.099723674,0.08813932,0.15444574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004909655,0.00007344851,0.5566012,0.00055619946,0.000084784646,0.00018114822,0.24128428,0.00036619543,0.00048283645,0.0037115058,0.1965027,0.00010659681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99851483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12631935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12631935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25019276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9165153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388081787","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199281879.003.0003","title":"Women’s Employment Patterns: Some Facts","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; European union; Mediterranean climate; Geography; Welfare; Subsidy; Demographic economics; Political science; Demography; Economics; Sociology; International trade","score_opus":0.0349551550103814,"score_gpt":0.2706393761026649,"score_spread":0.2356842210922835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388081787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62009233,0.18880722,0.0013618709,0.044216737,0.0010792043,0.000015763168,0.007215529,0.000044347442,0.13716699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416174,0.043110877,0.00043360557,0.0034719722,0.001044452,0.000014153876,0.0015888329,0.000031257227,0.008687413],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994816,0.00015232599,0.000059218557,0.00010291206,0.00014135426,0.00006269842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978631,0.0013032869,0.00034909477,0.0001246243,0.00027586188,0.00008399371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012678994,0.0001239979,0.00019855813,0.0021563668,0.00048924464,0.0012692617,0.00044649752,0.00045092017,0.0032210986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027678749,0.00010619661,0.00015268315,0.004114239,0.0012245004,0.0014139754,0.0005425595,0.00050785166,0.00040879124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035936714,0.000058524085,0.41237995,0.0011740016,0.00017777785,0.001329566,0.05092824,0.00054039876,0.0006193865,0.05584796,0.08152053,0.39506432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073888236,0.00006959933,0.6479989,0.0012994349,0.00004412079,0.0013542677,0.0160602,0.0001240573,0.00039603194,0.009684092,0.32292062,0.000041160565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012356142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018930474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012356142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006308871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024268014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024568439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388590822","doi":"10.52975/llt.2023v92.0019","title":"Krys Maki, Ineligible: Single Mothers Under Welfare Surveillance (Halifax and Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing 2021)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.024005594025435915,"score_gpt":0.25874756719118575,"score_spread":0.23474197316574982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388590822","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011005042,0.8712163,0.00016211922,0.089810975,0.008078919,0.000036744917,0.0013320507,0.000050458344,0.028211918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021837486,0.82021147,0.0008605981,0.009561923,0.002702532,0.00010374139,0.0015682592,0.0001546624,0.14299934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991536,0.00018004324,0.00007348216,0.000063807405,0.00035573612,0.00017328351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979791,0.00038784847,0.00024143296,0.000049954535,0.000817935,0.00052386336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016678292,0.0011935902,0.0006339239,0.0026961672,0.002353338,0.003206343,0.0016555255,0.0021786897,0.026175966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004459882,0.00091275846,0.00030752807,0.004979358,0.0016671465,0.0040358347,0.0018094856,0.002604601,0.006087938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026834354,0.0000065561717,0.0007649049,0.00032816004,0.0000041366925,0.00018655248,0.0014295565,0.000021702746,0.000045131797,0.0023152158,0.91129637,0.083574824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013636274,0.000009021473,0.015686778,0.0018378975,0.00001570662,0.00039538954,0.005014764,0.000017836113,0.00006156585,0.0011803396,0.9757465,0.000020473324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7443417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83359843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25565833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007676953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022209989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5143279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388653472","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3595342/v1","title":"Marriage and couples' well-being in Togo","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan; International Development Research Centre; University of Michigan","keywords":"Pooling; Context (archaeology); Ordinary least squares; Demographic economics; Marital status; Political science; Geography; Sociology; Demography; Economics; Population","score_opus":0.08478150036952484,"score_gpt":0.41566843876864784,"score_spread":0.330886938399123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388653472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987018,0.00024218568,0.000040327996,0.00016934055,0.0000057233874,0.0000028808627,0.00016979853,0.0000011979756,0.0006667577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995592,0.000105145424,0.00001644072,0.000015983718,0.0000034063412,0.000002349245,0.00009084491,3.8277653e-7,0.00020628612],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996872,0.0001209235,0.00001578034,0.000038824022,0.000036398334,0.00010104836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886477,0.0002121023,0.0005387471,0.0000361802,0.000059976785,0.00028830068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004215735,0.00014961882,0.00025376244,0.000995911,0.0009267658,0.0008667112,0.000220509,0.00035344248,0.0040275017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019820763,0.000074350406,0.0002525219,0.0020559202,0.0007146693,0.00029813746,0.0014322781,0.0005728771,0.00019146872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004142526,0.000057115467,0.9897058,0.00003765764,0.000048900525,0.00014447286,0.0038290534,0.00021142127,0.00012829209,0.00089166785,0.00025142575,0.0046526995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018292574,0.000026464042,0.9926172,0.000019024252,0.000012451696,0.000044069886,0.006225409,0.0001677128,0.000018678578,0.00024891592,0.0006145588,0.0000035923727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03272633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042420708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03272633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079170876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000424768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06507164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388771218","doi":"10.1515/9781552383544","title":"Give Your Other Vote to the Sister","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sister; Computer science; Genealogy; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03508237391257742,"score_gpt":0.24659641919203917,"score_spread":0.21151404527946174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388771218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072489595,0.005516199,0.000615612,0.28337607,0.07771796,0.00027967666,0.0005805367,0.0007349438,0.62393004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010897178,0.00076851307,0.0001347483,0.033618566,0.0022597197,0.00004956622,0.00008256149,0.00016938469,0.95201975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990318,0.00016830265,0.000026867372,0.00013491319,0.000369173,0.00026896433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762636,0.00009852346,0.00007533315,0.00008257135,0.00054751674,0.0015697924],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058014144,0.0006536352,0.0005262164,0.00075239857,0.009451005,0.0030943647,0.0009504669,0.002662519,0.36081532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005490829,0.0003358723,0.00035660874,0.00038469382,0.0010414484,0.0020339554,0.0038838768,0.004859707,0.12521474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010375654,0.000016790895,0.00021419176,0.000011988531,0.0000010888176,0.00010514757,0.000507478,0.0000024769313,0.00006475934,0.00085026986,0.9879417,0.010273711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061832034,0.0000115966695,0.00044740006,0.000041472595,0.0000014395413,0.00015367025,0.003002641,0.000007935046,0.000053967415,0.00020276698,0.9960646,0.0000063535535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033080585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07881671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36081532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022604032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023195525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9117194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388779583","doi":"10.1515/9781552382967-006","title":"Feeding the Family in Times of Change","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.06068712984623214,"score_gpt":0.2355727570690635,"score_spread":0.17488562722283135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388779583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009990436,0.12565969,0.00062779617,0.059671916,0.0033005467,0.000032812644,0.0000727405,0.00006024421,0.8005838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23997049,0.07400835,0.0014110899,0.00900174,0.00079952535,0.00007588832,0.000060456037,0.00009895117,0.6745736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940586,0.00030282218,0.000011104136,0.00005154223,0.00008551835,0.0001431001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957615,0.00015814585,0.000023513816,0.000036272253,0.00006203029,0.00014381585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011690897,0.0006262547,0.0005921233,0.0008521533,0.009339741,0.0071990243,0.00094832486,0.0026807624,0.0276312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016863765,0.0003893722,0.00014981184,0.0017245428,0.012986531,0.0039904355,0.002724892,0.00433143,0.002341306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006085936,0.000087306216,0.00082096976,0.00021691622,0.0000099355,0.0005941042,0.13483033,0.0002551621,0.00028505514,0.39094537,0.2796115,0.1922825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005669549,0.000015380994,0.0014071856,0.00060378836,0.0000039420297,0.00011230993,0.054603923,0.000035225316,0.000078654426,0.036081966,0.9070424,0.000009632967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091507114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20123805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091507114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010076569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008675309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18194896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389069534","doi":"10.1111/1540-6229.12467","title":"Why do young adults coreside with their parents?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Real Estate Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Percentage point; Demographic economics; Marriage market; Point (geometry); Labour economics; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.017663782017332083,"score_gpt":0.24627402458766703,"score_spread":0.22861024257033496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389069534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954039,0.0010898638,0.0000589855,0.001115847,0.00003318387,0.000004161017,0.00035000456,0.0000019555655,0.0019420587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867404,0.00043574418,0.000027535416,0.00017959303,0.000015189745,0.0000029793944,0.00010367406,7.22565e-7,0.00056054007],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976677,0.000058689286,0.00002096652,0.000041761374,0.000049910846,0.00006187159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827886,0.000329854,0.00093077804,0.00004512968,0.00011225726,0.00030321488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000588191,0.00008308011,0.00016589224,0.0004104154,0.00036124792,0.0006564197,0.0001873294,0.00037167463,0.0054718223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036469363,0.00011376904,0.0001432928,0.00049997616,0.00029919017,0.00060761446,0.0003569385,0.0005662582,0.00046019556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037237805,0.000022545195,0.9854047,0.000021479873,0.000012991774,0.00023167908,0.002237296,0.000011237054,0.00008601755,0.00023016351,0.0012233601,0.010481332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004066976,0.000049969567,0.98264325,0.000077257806,0.000012537543,0.0005638603,0.013623542,0.00006957657,0.00014848594,0.00029998217,0.0025028822,0.0000046443315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007792148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014804987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007792148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027960388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028013458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018305063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389353036","doi":"10.5670/oceanog.2024.111","title":"Actions and Challenges Toward Building Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Arctic Marine Science: The Case of the Canadian Research Icebreaker CCGS Amundsen","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oceanography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aquaculture; Equity (law); Fishery; Environmental science; Inclusion (mineral); Business; Natural resource economics; Economics; Chemistry; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Political science; Mineralogy","score_opus":0.15861379529634914,"score_gpt":0.38093814311212837,"score_spread":0.22232434781577923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389353036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5704896,0.002611834,0.0022157491,0.24785331,0.00057916867,0.00019556508,0.000046121462,0.000034230037,0.1759744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98235404,0.00056416006,0.0009654688,0.006249386,0.000046716905,0.000039399987,0.000009244105,0.000016208412,0.009755378],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98014957,0.0083602285,0.00023135231,0.00088197674,0.0020212296,0.008355581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98369503,0.005014854,0.0006086847,0.0005084154,0.0020049785,0.008167967],"candidate_categories":["sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022632606,0.00044409052,0.00053942,0.0014696962,0.09947846,0.01522456,0.0034689808,0.005675034,0.0040638223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0127287945,0.00040365043,0.0005856086,0.0018030814,0.054588445,0.0049983035,0.019437104,0.00981889,0.00017464906],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003261706,0.00007052814,0.007603428,0.000052780437,0.000015200519,0.0019178239,0.8353234,0.00023772962,0.0005117219,0.12423441,0.009775292,0.020225074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007094754,0.000018566456,0.0035957813,0.000117836935,0.00000752706,0.00017942917,0.8978107,0.000116439434,0.0001503974,0.011613026,0.08635117,0.000031964435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91296846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96043444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07695677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20856856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5583631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389379926","doi":"10.26530/9789401496476-088","title":"The food delivery industry and its lack of care in gender equality: the speculative case of ‘GiGi’","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Academia Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CTS Forex (Canada)","funders":"Royal College of Art","keywords":"Food delivery; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.17366369282718713,"score_gpt":0.3567059421566676,"score_spread":0.1830422493294805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389379926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19947363,0.008632948,0.010299387,0.08695511,0.0013293228,0.0000806735,0.00004049321,0.00009573968,0.6930927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8980897,0.0026408772,0.0030105223,0.008169303,0.0001736119,0.00011130167,0.000016869308,0.00008031572,0.08770746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982004,0.0011597377,0.00002089203,0.00014494601,0.00021797084,0.00025591845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881244,0.0008019289,0.000068769295,0.00010471216,0.000051363233,0.00016085512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030845748,0.00035626654,0.00022103419,0.0005080001,0.009637693,0.006150202,0.0011501345,0.0026839068,0.0051565254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021787696,0.00022606549,0.00022894656,0.0007328427,0.029237669,0.0059777796,0.006557611,0.003334244,0.00048734376],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017999038,0.00003173018,0.0006577594,0.00005850975,0.0000016310734,0.00084722333,0.2239952,0.000072365336,0.00022902664,0.74239016,0.010671074,0.021027328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013716861,0.000092931834,0.0011877296,0.00031494748,0.000005807708,0.0011323954,0.2728486,0.00034326286,0.00048634884,0.10700272,0.61655325,0.000018272578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054158852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009741682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009637693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044830763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027558082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03252715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389618816","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4661765","title":"Policies Inclusive of Men Improve Women's Marriage Outcomes: Evidence from a Post-Colonial Reform","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Political science; Gender studies; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.017208177746478256,"score_gpt":0.31240915194515945,"score_spread":0.2952009741986812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389618816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96741116,0.002922461,0.00010578119,0.0087532215,0.00008285728,0.000050435145,0.00017351432,0.000010672066,0.020489864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957814,0.0010179076,0.0000495297,0.0008227968,0.000057142945,0.000022277784,0.00005377121,0.000003872472,0.0021913603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961635,0.0017568301,0.00010061521,0.00026206838,0.0002990932,0.0014178732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882974,0.0051953355,0.003698012,0.0008882341,0.00054660393,0.0013744349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005364202,0.0003536587,0.00074443925,0.00060139445,0.0031357734,0.0020238487,0.0010082427,0.0012030258,0.009964858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015875237,0.00031035594,0.0003349389,0.0017357302,0.0047566784,0.0012205674,0.0034482218,0.0018405137,0.000510753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020631911,0.012118856,0.39515907,0.0027524552,0.0019676003,0.0015141399,0.058314547,0.004332411,0.0035241002,0.12073271,0.015319756,0.3636325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037047016,0.0056053502,0.9139264,0.0010781666,0.0012794599,0.00011038878,0.021208446,0.00057622226,0.0023740714,0.009733497,0.040340196,0.00006307279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059274413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.085505754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059274413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031037882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049455846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11785877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390140209","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2023.102107","title":"Where did the time go? The effects of China's two-day weekend policy on labor supply, household work, and wages","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"China Economic Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Bucknell University","keywords":"China; Work (physics); Hourly wage; Working hours; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Labour economics; Work hours; Working time; Wage; Demographic economics; Work time; Survey data collection; Wage growth; Political science","score_opus":0.01333531415758914,"score_gpt":0.2716450190667264,"score_spread":0.25830970490913724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390140209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82766473,0.09849305,0.00047294452,0.027802335,0.0007571259,0.000042549218,0.0011295073,0.000020630298,0.043617148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578721,0.035999034,0.00010923936,0.0010501685,0.00022171502,0.000017125614,0.00017577883,0.0000058138685,0.0045489804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995796,0.000106718995,0.00001789838,0.0000316945,0.00007300863,0.00019110602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940956,0.00016842716,0.00015343455,0.00002324453,0.00009771448,0.00014767412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090170105,0.00024152438,0.000328793,0.0008394799,0.0009725513,0.0014827648,0.0005548317,0.0007242558,0.0042202026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001142023,0.00015477576,0.0004388464,0.0021191584,0.0012967013,0.0009541779,0.0007563323,0.0008569003,0.00016365497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015197819,0.00071454415,0.43800542,0.003581813,0.00073812954,0.0014218662,0.008466249,0.008378254,0.0030750018,0.19316848,0.03736098,0.30356953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000629777,0.000194044,0.9225626,0.0008404313,0.0002609283,0.00006500887,0.0077513224,0.0016865003,0.0004225021,0.007891583,0.05820657,0.000055467433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15834974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3188232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15834974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004561526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065536513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3148561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390231551","doi":"10.34172/ijhpm.2023.8366","title":"Is Reformulation Still a Suitable Goal for Sugary Beverage Taxes? A Response to Recent Commentaries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Public Health Research Programme; University of Oxford; Medical Research Council; National Institute for Health and Care Research","keywords":"Economics; Public economics; Psychology; Marketing; Public relations; Computer science; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.059420140889694946,"score_gpt":0.420823058749194,"score_spread":0.3614029178594991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390231551","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000387526,0.00037846956,0.00008654369,0.9936603,0.0036213628,0.0000062495765,0.00004414389,0.00001066577,0.0018047629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050413604,0.0003671843,0.00015852683,0.98622686,0.0055950065,0.000036054877,0.000023527431,0.000034970686,0.0025165912],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97811365,0.004836051,0.0020022711,0.004240293,0.0057191523,0.0050885463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.865619,0.09988484,0.0073170695,0.0033271762,0.01814181,0.0057100807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03217806,0.0013841605,0.0021453295,0.0015974833,0.013122457,0.016690698,0.007509608,0.12528862,0.01655317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11937556,0.0014046436,0.002877188,0.003496135,0.0142578,0.016481727,0.009038293,0.11525857,0.0062224334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009451331,0.000051670377,0.0006598599,0.00019346138,0.0000353349,0.00028759867,0.0028737236,0.00014764578,0.00026833566,0.053703006,0.9367128,0.0049720923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013659305,0.000067395325,0.002902759,0.0012764164,0.00012438743,0.00013305453,0.008827403,0.00047722564,0.00075833494,0.036652658,0.9483994,0.0002442971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04078248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043082375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12528862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011914141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02767981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17017585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390278389","doi":"10.1016/j.red.2023.12.001","title":"Unmarried births: Accounting and equilibrium analysis, 1960-1995","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Dynamics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Economics; Birth control; Marital status; Demographic economics; Matching (statistics); Birth rate; Marriage market; Population; Family planning; Fertility; Demography; Medicine; Research methodology; Sociology; Pregnancy; Biology","score_opus":0.020503544351625047,"score_gpt":0.30501253707694426,"score_spread":0.2845089927253192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390278389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83253,0.076128155,0.02378185,0.003545548,0.00023444061,0.00008394949,0.029142732,0.00030640443,0.034246974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.944213,0.02998361,0.0032116387,0.00004739625,0.0001158964,0.000035149424,0.008712211,0.00003448371,0.0136466455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999713,0.000063343585,0.00003600401,0.000048215963,0.00009398179,0.000045393215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989587,0.00039787756,0.00020005109,0.000091626316,0.00032598092,0.000025787149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095224124,0.00027697795,0.00034518048,0.0027572971,0.00047957597,0.0008834645,0.00082726835,0.00030630207,0.002247583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045313365,0.00024857422,0.00046785464,0.004546358,0.000260569,0.0010216219,0.00045540207,0.00037784353,0.00046307434],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021574408,0.0001277219,0.4124265,0.00049966056,0.00031926745,0.00048453064,0.0018038551,0.065603934,0.00042658256,0.15090804,0.033028293,0.33415595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003085537,0.0001088193,0.68753994,0.000505632,0.0004266836,0.00087953993,0.003188773,0.11566636,0.0019504571,0.06391222,0.12570684,0.0000838548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12847322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10133368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12847322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002237954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017483359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25545084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390652679","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/j9skr","title":"Studying Individuals in Same-Sex Couples using Longitudinal Administrative Data from Canadian Tax Records: Opportunities and Challenges","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; University of Alberta; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Earnings; Sample (material); Census; Longitudinal study; Data quality; Survey data collection; Identification (biology); Demographic economics; Psychology; Demography; Business; Social psychology; Economics; Accounting; Population; Medicine; Statistics; Sociology; Marketing","score_opus":0.4905051666487619,"score_gpt":0.39467090280407524,"score_spread":0.09583426384468668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390652679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47377312,0.055504538,0.109724306,0.2143321,0.0036117386,0.0030075242,0.10110394,0.00043639983,0.03850641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79571015,0.026222013,0.12274655,0.017368952,0.0013429208,0.0034090842,0.03019922,0.00020226576,0.0027987978],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9549303,0.02277386,0.0031607235,0.003043647,0.0133936675,0.0026978643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8234527,0.08003481,0.020469345,0.021781692,0.048222866,0.0060385372],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059270915,0.0008337772,0.0015905254,0.007330838,0.0069714594,0.005058143,0.00562227,0.0012662931,0.0026067249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14867571,0.00079371093,0.0012777871,0.019884301,0.0037663386,0.0037055695,0.0066572824,0.0030863378,0.0005163889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017449712,0.00016983943,0.7358922,0.0026049872,0.0008511297,0.0003836099,0.016845223,0.0035080907,0.0003930239,0.025313072,0.050092533,0.16377169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091123846,0.00014755428,0.68257415,0.010416367,0.0007351713,0.0004851226,0.039255187,0.0140431905,0.0010478388,0.04953838,0.20123354,0.00043238341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9064089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92379814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017476792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.076685324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31345832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390773113","doi":"10.61959/p210910q","title":"Access to Parental Benefits in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Unemployment; Government (linguistics); Parental leave; Business; Work (physics); Disability benefits; Demographic economics; Disability insurance; Cost–benefit analysis; Income Support; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Social security","score_opus":0.1220199552713504,"score_gpt":0.36937889627820464,"score_spread":0.24735894100685424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390773113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66056234,0.013682264,0.00035130908,0.03349787,0.0004320382,0.00033847982,0.05487573,0.00015712105,0.23610282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9302214,0.0131206745,0.00076597236,0.0041169007,0.00008148715,0.00013061098,0.009951205,0.00003996088,0.04157187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810696,0.000057835,0.0000620221,0.00011202213,0.0007532743,0.0009079493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99460274,0.00023179872,0.00041272255,0.000102988546,0.001976296,0.002673496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007564317,0.00022354933,0.00026299848,0.001921248,0.004863859,0.0018017808,0.0009997336,0.0004915536,0.01062991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031320981,0.00023794181,0.00039993282,0.004712862,0.00079386076,0.00068024115,0.0014738904,0.0012394978,0.0004630156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018482118,0.00020967507,0.64339036,0.0003774795,0.00008935256,0.0010737354,0.010019751,0.00050177623,0.00039674088,0.019431641,0.16484775,0.15947695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028265098,0.000030076077,0.87106496,0.0004234469,0.000027603963,0.00018694697,0.006259886,0.00021051131,0.00013236048,0.0006061763,0.1209812,0.00004846893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99785596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054281116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054281116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12399528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39383888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390953963","doi":"10.1007/s11150-023-09688-0","title":"Estimating a model of inefficient cooperation and consumption in collective households","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inefficiency; Consumption (sociology); Liberian dollar; Economics; Microeconomics; Resource (disambiguation); Econometrics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.06411727310721312,"score_gpt":0.29163007155463794,"score_spread":0.22751279844742484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390953963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5740164,0.001214257,0.41133347,0.0036189673,0.00007583188,0.00015206532,0.00081294356,0.00019093683,0.008585224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538053,0.00092446187,0.029662184,0.000179204,0.00008601115,0.00026598183,0.0005341722,0.00006816024,0.014474655],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982128,0.0011186196,0.00005620802,0.00029422063,0.00007307859,0.00024510323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983307,0.014696829,0.0010618954,0.00034951902,0.0003073058,0.00027743552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046266625,0.0009864409,0.00299126,0.0010509333,0.0008830198,0.0030309572,0.0022844763,0.0033652019,0.0055775605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014471969,0.0015531146,0.0014582278,0.0020455574,0.0023938036,0.0024293708,0.0019629821,0.002294068,0.0004930323],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009414833,0.0001337356,0.007308693,0.000070992646,0.000172367,0.00013251994,0.00030417228,0.9188009,0.00014801952,0.06573839,0.0010829604,0.0060131736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043295153,0.000039815666,0.0014768442,0.00002003469,0.000041765594,0.000020973817,0.00023180006,0.9428779,0.0000656547,0.054709267,0.00044760597,0.000024988536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0360789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028143223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0360789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032557237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024486654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071737766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391387053","doi":"10.1257/pol.20210075","title":"Labor Supply Responses to Income Taxation among Older Couples: Evidence from a Canadian Reform","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Economic Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Statistics Canada; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Public economics","score_opus":0.014330378648208606,"score_gpt":0.30267054110632435,"score_spread":0.2883401624581157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391387053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97896063,0.0028326188,0.00019898303,0.003917887,0.000032679145,0.000120805955,0.0017532003,0.000007724664,0.012175386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944326,0.0018326049,0.00017218372,0.00076849497,0.000023643865,0.000033020926,0.0005986706,0.0000033851852,0.0021353846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749786,0.0006151368,0.00010127905,0.00025570372,0.00088433677,0.00064566475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98713106,0.0026204053,0.004353486,0.0008644073,0.004110097,0.00092053856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004314497,0.00023141332,0.00046287596,0.0009372516,0.003198995,0.0013362463,0.0011207733,0.000688264,0.004100165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017179219,0.00019741095,0.0004943273,0.0028828527,0.0017773669,0.0004314982,0.0012900033,0.00096059573,0.00021307296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001571424,0.0009029292,0.8821438,0.0004394142,0.00033933934,0.00013268623,0.008844927,0.0014363978,0.00068631116,0.008407806,0.011219681,0.08387539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011538147,0.00018062997,0.9854543,0.00013956525,0.00014081839,0.000014215142,0.0033342557,0.0004843385,0.00022310718,0.00036196262,0.009527518,0.000023911232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98765624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9888326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9618426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038157422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027141469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27685273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391715194","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_3203","title":"Wealth Taxes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.04602683533496865,"score_gpt":0.2959442898577912,"score_spread":0.24991745452282255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391715194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013389625,0.00096333935,0.0017540593,0.0014622104,0.00018323619,0.000023441684,0.0002278459,0.00005808876,0.9939889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031105958,0.001317959,0.0007329477,0.0009867678,0.00016224838,0.00005773966,0.00021840444,0.00004695782,0.9653709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973947,0.00004165435,0.0000074769077,0.00005691944,0.00010448341,0.000049937862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998653,0.000025571131,0.000010153467,0.000037507172,0.00004674111,0.000014745197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037260572,0.000517112,0.00032952288,0.00076848146,0.0014131072,0.0030378844,0.000544248,0.0015740906,0.084095374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012553242,0.0002867201,0.00024171444,0.00067371456,0.0010617205,0.0025663797,0.0009575388,0.0027057866,0.02318784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012037687,0.00002431863,0.00014830472,0.00001967132,0.000003493525,0.00002318383,0.00009608642,0.00019035548,0.00017711874,0.9100006,0.056846593,0.032458123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069139674,0.000012154091,0.00060247415,0.00009919734,0.0000051050215,0.000082996456,0.0001239157,0.00030860963,0.0004141939,0.24363896,0.75469834,0.0000071401582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050357315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076719527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084095374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016797644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013492068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28132707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391726845","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_4076","title":"Teen Motherhood in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"History; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.026132222064183905,"score_gpt":0.24159968288426492,"score_spread":0.215467460820081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391726845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16867591,0.08109191,0.00046410837,0.068848036,0.0039045874,0.00015987844,0.0013156806,0.000098930446,0.67544097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47987157,0.050802357,0.0006754909,0.0054761954,0.00024214666,0.00010166749,0.00045767106,0.00008396144,0.4622889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989467,0.00011005758,0.000019711586,0.000053234075,0.00026812268,0.00060203066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917006,0.000076917066,0.000035442554,0.000012094562,0.00024108359,0.00046442787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068825344,0.00026997316,0.0003880191,0.0012741407,0.015958672,0.004634984,0.0012567688,0.001631768,0.014689486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015592403,0.000343364,0.00031436092,0.0031475064,0.0017781621,0.0007982791,0.0020242482,0.002878485,0.00070662174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006739616,0.00016278925,0.0237142,0.00026237738,0.000019831808,0.0021305017,0.095487274,0.00053991313,0.00029055023,0.39501327,0.29571465,0.18659726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001374882,0.000022592909,0.02213962,0.0005398203,0.000013910621,0.00022667485,0.044206537,0.0002442705,0.00012581763,0.002876429,0.9295669,0.000023608756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085383825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.085383825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22615494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6195059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391789314","doi":"10.24908/cmj.v23i3.17319","title":"Women’s Deployment Experiences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Military Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Software deployment; Business; Computer science; Software engineering","score_opus":0.017766606673174926,"score_gpt":0.2594019394353283,"score_spread":0.24163533276215338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391789314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9279675,0.0014306417,0.00007243653,0.008211913,0.00035068544,0.00003384122,0.00036498118,0.000008474735,0.061559536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98249704,0.0011388878,0.00003725771,0.0010037355,0.00006268657,0.000038420385,0.00016752424,0.000010627716,0.01504389],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980835,0.00047305776,0.000052040974,0.00007934407,0.00021745803,0.001094693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976253,0.00040468585,0.00025778692,0.00005242565,0.00047282685,0.0011869511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015956045,0.0002938641,0.0003884712,0.0017039704,0.012474494,0.00428659,0.0006774343,0.0010152889,0.012942213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047142776,0.00030948519,0.00021761018,0.0022844644,0.0028477397,0.002038659,0.0036660817,0.00228406,0.0010099304],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022172023,0.00019931531,0.094159506,0.00011451208,0.00002315378,0.0013877373,0.84377325,0.00005678872,0.0006730094,0.008850234,0.019441275,0.031099556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004702373,0.000035674,0.06506173,0.000088274544,0.0000042663605,0.00016459411,0.9005624,0.000011761412,0.000049628583,0.00022415581,0.03377988,0.000012986716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23681043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35155436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23681043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005348038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067012636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47086412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392532992","doi":"10.70675/11b48b7fz2ecez42afz926dzd768f52a6591","title":"Analyse économique des comportements en matière de protection sociale","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Behavioral economics; Positive economics; Economics; Data science; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.06063727770899497,"score_gpt":0.31107941275979195,"score_spread":0.250442135050797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392532992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8641894,0.017912086,0.056510236,0.00829206,0.00015951788,0.0002660832,0.00805008,0.00012085103,0.044499714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.952943,0.009452953,0.012361959,0.00038930692,0.00012568317,0.0002687044,0.0019816698,0.000038146205,0.022438547],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980831,0.0008054916,0.00009816808,0.00034577813,0.00044657107,0.00022098144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938035,0.0043066354,0.0009810226,0.0002763233,0.0005005914,0.00013191241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002413803,0.0005505812,0.00086533726,0.0016138754,0.0005950448,0.0025206988,0.0005992277,0.00083532784,0.013830155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007975633,0.00032900085,0.001788947,0.0029532895,0.00067987206,0.00131419,0.00094926957,0.0012646538,0.0009161911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004082364,0.0003295262,0.5875833,0.0016890158,0.002389942,0.0005069142,0.0055993064,0.04211656,0.0037361174,0.19103657,0.005651056,0.1589535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034702465,0.0004267902,0.8527381,0.00084073487,0.00067453616,0.00022233109,0.005388935,0.023893878,0.0027348197,0.05524077,0.05771365,0.00009083557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064833485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050173413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064833485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034780228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029392836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12891221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392736454","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2403.05573","title":"Beyond Predictive Algorithms in Child Welfare","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Welfare; Computer science; Algorithm; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Market economy","score_opus":0.03384062802075889,"score_gpt":0.2056683634111221,"score_spread":0.17182773539036322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392736454","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09168714,0.0032411595,0.88688827,0.0076782247,0.00020703863,0.00046334288,0.00076830044,0.0011776556,0.0078888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74435943,0.0013371373,0.24866574,0.0012744656,0.0003908532,0.00060127355,0.0014257339,0.00014132167,0.0018040916],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892903,0.0073481845,0.0004915751,0.0014326843,0.0011041092,0.00033316851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89236194,0.09601379,0.0036765123,0.0036124995,0.003603122,0.00073218613],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021765962,0.0017110899,0.0015578275,0.0047251116,0.0012529596,0.0054204515,0.0026930126,0.0021796653,0.0029963837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08737882,0.0007588555,0.0011910655,0.0041023265,0.0028337461,0.005546902,0.0031645135,0.00507625,0.00060888374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002518908,0.00035712888,0.04057046,0.00051553716,0.0004503311,0.0002083126,0.0018566719,0.6476314,0.00033742716,0.079078816,0.0046532345,0.22408877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024455341,0.00004453366,0.0017258669,0.000171176,0.00002990145,0.000029294932,0.0003169577,0.84057844,0.00028997046,0.15468602,0.0020775385,0.000025788317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012667997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009659929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99874705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031597398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003030881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115110815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392757101","doi":"10.1002/hec.4822","title":"The optimal design of assisted reproductive technologies policies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fecundity; Economics; Utilitarianism; Egalitarianism; Fertility; Wage; Incentive; Assisted reproductive technology; Welfare; Public economics; Microeconomics; Labour economics; Demography; Biology; Population; Infertility; Market economy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07048388330347885,"score_gpt":0.3389968115259824,"score_spread":0.2685129282225035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392757101","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2579642,0.0042531067,0.64949936,0.007454358,0.00031015972,0.0009113866,0.0007216018,0.00031120089,0.07857454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96381384,0.0013569046,0.027206352,0.00023325681,0.000056784964,0.00027025488,0.000070497175,0.000023375194,0.006968662],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975032,0.001662471,0.00006278059,0.00024576008,0.00016038421,0.0003653023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99485105,0.0038295654,0.00068486854,0.00014316181,0.00023932217,0.000251994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032856835,0.0008209692,0.001524784,0.0008641425,0.0004900757,0.0023189974,0.001252567,0.0021494473,0.0050907414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013230378,0.0009943481,0.0005071189,0.0006309869,0.0014159395,0.0023302885,0.0011769572,0.0013207864,0.0005030384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000542802,0.0002833103,0.0016980795,0.00036012474,0.00014550515,0.00020836807,0.000175541,0.5802619,0.0014200439,0.3762283,0.0028633743,0.03581274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004143204,0.00033421454,0.0013162469,0.00015129066,0.000068906964,0.000097288736,0.00029650907,0.5975471,0.0008404283,0.39220265,0.0066891084,0.0000419813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017984863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018142625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050907414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029263285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036422526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021232128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392972973","doi":"10.26443/mjgh.v9i1.1322","title":"Black Mothers in America","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Journal of Global Health","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Childbirth; Psychological intervention; Socioeconomic status; Racism; Health equity; Inequality; Health care; Poverty; Infant mortality; Political science; Demographic economics; Psychology; Medicine; Economic growth; Environmental health; Nursing; Economics; Pregnancy; Population","score_opus":0.03725216571542695,"score_gpt":0.3491080780963987,"score_spread":0.31185591238097177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392972973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6339402,0.031181976,0.00053181633,0.13237329,0.0055626156,0.00014603326,0.0014808079,0.000085072716,0.19469814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8275389,0.030729098,0.00094358524,0.056016028,0.0011412255,0.0002009971,0.00041233317,0.000058410158,0.08295935],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997087,0.000070506576,0.0000061331734,0.00003401097,0.000056434426,0.00012420685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961346,0.000040237974,0.00006962239,0.00001112684,0.00008157081,0.0001840005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006195283,0.00023077567,0.00020891157,0.0005158119,0.005009431,0.000897336,0.00026238512,0.0006937503,0.025048811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009831678,0.000108999346,0.00014491501,0.00041538765,0.00044942144,0.0006716736,0.0013051138,0.0010695521,0.0015519727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021990648,0.0003488877,0.25498497,0.00042865064,0.000059148315,0.0035992707,0.06469791,0.000032084645,0.004284414,0.028278455,0.28941208,0.35365424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030599593,0.00017430642,0.16411556,0.0012548872,0.00006748916,0.0021041587,0.08447675,0.00007565466,0.0006715012,0.0037640082,0.7432289,0.000036221314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033380013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062520936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033380013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010526568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002247275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08379668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393244988","doi":"10.1257/app.20210816","title":"The Impact of Cash Transfers to Poor Mothers on Family Structure and Maternal Well-Being","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Applied Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; University of Toronto; Queen's University; California Center for Population Research, University of California, Los Angeles; University of Minnesota; Princeton University; Carnegie Mellon University; National Institutes of Health; Yale University","keywords":"Cash transfers; Demographic economics; Poverty; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0059699409717618125,"score_gpt":0.24907891360148351,"score_spread":0.2431089726297217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393244988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993411,0.00007398075,0.00002979629,0.00004907661,0.000002110685,0.0000032262778,0.00030368517,9.723973e-7,0.00019609164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950755,0.00009090833,0.000040874664,0.0000122553265,0.0000044435787,0.000007342331,0.00020109567,3.7172995e-7,0.00013512737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993594,0.00034516733,0.000030627627,0.00005763744,0.000062667736,0.00014449976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99432606,0.0023567092,0.0025054666,0.00023076542,0.00019389763,0.0003870897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011584542,0.00021176883,0.00021413731,0.0007978962,0.00042851106,0.00041363458,0.00030233225,0.00032068905,0.0015506822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008771668,0.00012731832,0.0003376556,0.00069773843,0.00030527412,0.0003648898,0.0007281521,0.0003800785,0.00012975562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019211436,0.00007436238,0.9939872,0.00001036952,0.00005904502,0.000062942534,0.00015179203,0.00032271555,0.00005907251,0.000066572495,0.00015071982,0.0048630596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075028847,0.00017798021,0.9984901,0.000013417039,0.000041479325,0.00006247591,0.00041254895,0.00039262217,0.000090784095,0.000085910535,0.00022133271,0.0000039418305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012598192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020515217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012598192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056670955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035826705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025049686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393434837","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4178899/v1","title":"Covariate Shocks, Women’s Bargaining Power, and Household Vulnerability","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Covariate; Vulnerability (computing); Bargaining power; Economics; Power (physics); Demographic economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.10505571620280302,"score_gpt":0.40443660834071204,"score_spread":0.299380892137909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393434837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952058,0.00007458169,0.0019571332,0.00033003467,0.0000064037977,0.000021102154,0.00030400683,0.0000067478313,0.00209416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928004,0.000033051325,0.0001746567,0.000018321249,0.0000037165617,0.000011517836,0.000055144123,6.430661e-7,0.00042304647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993901,0.00032268238,0.000022371443,0.00008876458,0.00007561827,0.00010032612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99471503,0.003247644,0.0014914798,0.00026907292,0.00009894364,0.00017788197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016238071,0.00019057933,0.0002641691,0.0004177779,0.00036737113,0.00077828433,0.0003187125,0.0006010566,0.010341969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009648554,0.00011215878,0.0001928094,0.0007785373,0.00096832967,0.0004756575,0.0007620146,0.00049753324,0.00030523425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046492543,0.00033625937,0.90021473,0.0001004647,0.00017699358,0.000394069,0.0018052243,0.034224894,0.0036130007,0.023744313,0.0011873113,0.033737756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004564544,0.0006010859,0.92252254,0.000044528144,0.000057218527,0.00011774713,0.0058247913,0.032356728,0.0015913313,0.03374997,0.003051317,0.000036972313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026989717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020784016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010341969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006799401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002757869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034597337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394598537","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4786066","title":"The Gender Division of Work Across Countries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Work (physics); Division of labour; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Mathematics; Arithmetic; Mechanical engineering; Law","score_opus":0.012989618601124586,"score_gpt":0.3027791001905575,"score_spread":0.2897894815894329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394598537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96604687,0.0029835599,0.00025680786,0.0009958112,0.00005317056,0.000011223958,0.00026316705,0.0000036194895,0.029385699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881697,0.0003693112,0.000025418882,0.00004347184,0.000007966258,0.0000053478793,0.00003855838,0.0000021751596,0.000690777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699414,0.0012604849,0.00009267798,0.00025509731,0.00035260755,0.0010449488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965006,0.0015711442,0.00075668143,0.00018896627,0.000345858,0.0006367547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018719613,0.00020062792,0.0003656306,0.0034194558,0.0022824025,0.0031237567,0.00037922818,0.0004961762,0.0075673326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053512626,0.00020570494,0.0002803654,0.00482831,0.0034159562,0.0018657465,0.002762049,0.0005081422,0.00044182243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009778393,0.0001637954,0.6394465,0.0003337474,0.00026923945,0.0007321699,0.15381198,0.0007204702,0.0014547516,0.10536943,0.0049823793,0.09173763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031505257,0.00016732563,0.8272643,0.00037463888,0.000043491356,0.0001824777,0.14734371,0.00014256132,0.00016312627,0.009865705,0.014396632,0.000024526704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014878941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025198694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014878941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013402208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014531355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029584646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394703148","doi":"10.25071/p9z0cs30","title":"Child care in Canada and the United States","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada Watch","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.005111632846693182,"score_gpt":0.1984588802322406,"score_spread":0.1933472473855474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394703148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3054231,0.047184728,0.00037185574,0.053238545,0.0012849268,0.00017715704,0.019823361,0.00021461655,0.57228166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8366507,0.033435907,0.001278026,0.010985368,0.00017216221,0.00016788133,0.005237199,0.00006537994,0.11200739],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869365,0.000070943635,0.000037171612,0.00008371943,0.00047854838,0.000636015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974468,0.0000756653,0.00013014776,0.00002789771,0.0008885165,0.0014310646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048559977,0.00019164919,0.00026774895,0.0023209972,0.007471718,0.0033276759,0.00073782116,0.00072871504,0.0101219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017579217,0.00015641966,0.00033876378,0.0064775445,0.0009960989,0.0006201465,0.0015293646,0.0011596815,0.0006077393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014045565,0.00013665343,0.2960009,0.00036023717,0.00009446471,0.0013767091,0.012295009,0.00053395313,0.00032135998,0.0756429,0.40074483,0.21235244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026533951,0.000027360364,0.4781349,0.00056407915,0.000029022418,0.0002599037,0.011988933,0.00019509805,0.00010097519,0.00096330245,0.50766695,0.000043016065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99925345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07472921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07472921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12689254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5422009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394755442","doi":"10.1177/23210222241237030","title":"The Complexity of Female Empowerment in India","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Microeconomics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Empowerment; Agency (philosophy); Salience (neuroscience); Women's empowerment; Context (archaeology); Political science; Politics; Economic growth; Development economics; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Geography; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.06781882116765776,"score_gpt":0.35383612132702874,"score_spread":0.286017300159371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394755442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5336823,0.00813067,0.0017008444,0.05789473,0.00027281916,0.00003587585,0.00016054952,0.00004891536,0.39807338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910143,0.0022519655,0.00019712823,0.00070521387,0.000103435515,0.000010999817,0.000022409386,0.000008104624,0.0056864233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976266,0.00083011907,0.000056927667,0.00017736205,0.00049577607,0.0008131928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901843,0.00038517383,0.00021487103,0.00007889766,0.00011321547,0.00018940649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012815612,0.00018880736,0.0002449819,0.0012807387,0.003195284,0.0057545174,0.00060116977,0.00052780606,0.0033963784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018019377,0.00017854809,0.00022461952,0.0018595781,0.013285891,0.0017581625,0.005056313,0.0013193877,0.0002300382],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000821392,0.000046564353,0.026588421,0.00020883005,0.000020312138,0.0014029598,0.04347205,0.0008164348,0.00061581854,0.85220075,0.008962876,0.065582894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023502484,0.00011289705,0.19446357,0.00060582097,0.000033041655,0.0019950466,0.13438052,0.001287588,0.00095244864,0.30807462,0.35797256,0.00009839069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014122998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022570033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014122998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005759176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041322038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041785955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394786553","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/vqzta","title":"Bargaining between the sexes: outside options and leisure time in hunter-gatherer households","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Leverhulme Trust; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Economics; Labour economics; Welfare; Leverage (statistics); Subsistence agriculture; Social capital; Population; Division of labour; Demographic economics; Sociology; Market economy; Geography","score_opus":0.040089130182272906,"score_gpt":0.3031017308987125,"score_spread":0.2630126007164396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394786553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976223,0.000083652194,0.000455576,0.00015183803,0.000001499676,0.0000018190647,0.000016344125,9.84681e-7,0.0016659613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992686,0.000038214337,0.000104707346,0.000016651646,0.0000026034963,0.0000021440198,0.000013316171,6.496419e-7,0.0005530929],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958676,0.00021539757,0.000013547867,0.00006354577,0.00003635132,0.00008435041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815744,0.00097580976,0.00046712699,0.00010417868,0.000050156767,0.0002451974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011165496,0.00015818232,0.00030670007,0.00047904713,0.0009396171,0.0012315641,0.00033115075,0.00055680407,0.0067513087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036860749,0.00015724842,0.00019684932,0.0004825194,0.0016223404,0.0010975584,0.0011239483,0.00044708973,0.00027163822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034165944,0.0002523075,0.90760577,0.000047446298,0.00010256994,0.0006760968,0.029525073,0.0021817316,0.001326351,0.03182085,0.0005957353,0.025524296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030550986,0.00017247906,0.88215774,0.00007709402,0.000048564565,0.0003713972,0.05709356,0.009142176,0.0004010113,0.04796512,0.0025022512,0.00003806275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057229917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01100433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067513087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042346353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021281793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022585332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394863737","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4784734","title":"One Cohort at a Time: A New Perspective on the Declining Gender Pay Gap","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Perspective (graphical); Cohort; Internet privacy; Demographic economics; Computer science; Business; Political science; World Wide Web; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.028976059834805282,"score_gpt":0.30617738109395926,"score_spread":0.277201321259154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394863737","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25567243,0.014314326,0.0071971277,0.6496913,0.00286274,0.000024659446,0.0004911271,0.000027507058,0.069718845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96039087,0.008086213,0.0009795416,0.016780281,0.003422351,0.000044407567,0.00007951052,0.00003291999,0.010183891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987627,0.0004815367,0.000034752702,0.00019186255,0.00015138445,0.00037780806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99492365,0.0030108867,0.0004224118,0.00024484418,0.00030677204,0.0010914032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048749824,0.0002732406,0.00056972407,0.0019307074,0.002701157,0.0042647277,0.0012088134,0.0035900187,0.010458343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009375485,0.0002055781,0.0003835491,0.001691742,0.0069772755,0.0098089,0.0033497817,0.004800987,0.0004097514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011661195,0.00013923865,0.034281157,0.000077792545,0.0000138126825,0.00056560826,0.038954575,0.00040935757,0.000284527,0.8595017,0.015911972,0.04974362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004410836,0.00030087438,0.052647263,0.0006664469,0.000035618163,0.0013455036,0.13788812,0.00287013,0.00029430698,0.6345914,0.1692259,0.000090363385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014577015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017319765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014577015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021125306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003866053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034986675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394964037","doi":"10.25071/renwbj37","title":"Women in Latin America","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada Watch","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Political science","score_opus":0.013943707809645075,"score_gpt":0.24532376851606144,"score_spread":0.23138006070641637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394964037","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17770185,0.20019688,0.00011977055,0.37889186,0.0060245898,0.000090165515,0.0021640672,0.000038219354,0.23477267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5861702,0.13128687,0.00032861304,0.05973572,0.0029787328,0.00022626958,0.0013314718,0.00007467729,0.21786754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943954,0.000138447,0.000014464791,0.000039479593,0.00006590895,0.00030221208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924016,0.00009858143,0.00007179678,0.000013819455,0.0001445579,0.0004310692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001229523,0.00029039607,0.00034024133,0.0014081454,0.0055522756,0.0032256441,0.00049005466,0.0015568036,0.017488562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014231876,0.00014646005,0.00018892837,0.003185068,0.0015214512,0.0015925629,0.002650802,0.0019522429,0.0005660421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031522973,0.00029118182,0.11424431,0.0013744279,0.000054423013,0.0016041483,0.0995776,0.00013065503,0.0012831975,0.07879826,0.4769554,0.22537115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001806025,0.00002230624,0.09427812,0.0007151662,0.0000157824,0.00010120776,0.078854874,0.000017913673,0.00008044054,0.0010477372,0.824835,0.000013437502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6148765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.779227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6148765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008949739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018155877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77478313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395672216","doi":"10.1111/caje.12704","title":"Free, full‐day programming for four‐year‐old children in Nova Scotia and women's labour market outcomes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Child care; Demographic economics; Medicine; Economics; Labour economics; Political science; Demography; Geography; Nursing; Sociology","score_opus":0.053739303744097376,"score_gpt":0.21115160918699846,"score_spread":0.15741230544290108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395672216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958763,0.00018087172,0.000034811423,0.0005192133,0.000018747038,0.000011740192,0.0012918955,0.000002209336,0.002064198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784374,0.00012315848,0.000047191465,0.00008594995,0.000003752543,0.000014093492,0.00027653587,0.0000015594353,0.0016039],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960333,0.00005443436,0.000009566168,0.000036213067,0.000042535874,0.00025397597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990815,0.00009930493,0.00024045355,0.000026289508,0.00013225959,0.00042027485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041026162,0.00013338453,0.00017453218,0.00036736342,0.0009912311,0.00069470354,0.00038614604,0.00023183778,0.0026356708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001400525,0.00010073839,0.00024657467,0.00045321506,0.00045108225,0.00015392009,0.00087022723,0.00053846627,0.000187021],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021484513,0.000102176426,0.980099,0.00008517878,0.000046073892,0.0006000739,0.0033593508,0.00036800862,0.0007272631,0.0005889682,0.003100327,0.010708697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074233867,0.00004803408,0.99413776,0.000059172187,0.000010213936,0.00004405913,0.003703284,0.000113667214,0.00008945135,0.0000428833,0.001738926,0.0000050940266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91440284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96240956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08559716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064490438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072062253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17220247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395680024","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4805539","title":"Demography, Human Capital Investment, and Lifetime Earnings for Women and Men","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Investment (military); Human capital; Demographic economics; Economics; Capital (architecture); Demography; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science; History; Finance; Economic growth; Ancient history","score_opus":0.007463287144894197,"score_gpt":0.2607663570000787,"score_spread":0.2533030698551845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395680024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99796706,0.0004414536,0.000046244528,0.00021217982,0.000008329022,0.0000016144592,0.0003527393,0.0000015868181,0.0009688044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987338,0.00019332377,0.000015214591,0.0000179046,0.000009144391,0.0000015073955,0.00023288938,8.5839025e-7,0.0007953025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998572,0.000037333,0.000008526296,0.000022579652,0.00001197498,0.0000623995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837315,0.00047700963,0.0004831563,0.00007771749,0.00007355337,0.000515309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005659148,0.00014091103,0.00021812723,0.0006397707,0.00052049715,0.00074043544,0.00020307077,0.0003939046,0.005278194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032225272,0.00011219611,0.00029030943,0.000991691,0.00031868668,0.00085137127,0.0005087568,0.00050732674,0.0004552404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014435778,0.000047207566,0.99470055,0.0000066197754,0.000037728652,0.00007669387,0.00077695854,0.00014254486,0.00004172475,0.00044285532,0.00024798652,0.0033349013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004944508,0.000089572466,0.9945909,0.000014871096,0.00002279203,0.00011175958,0.0034587944,0.00035755258,0.000038703536,0.0005729544,0.0007307457,0.0000065915174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019072998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028537687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019072998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038776212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003005808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03792399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396530320","doi":"10.61838/kman.jprfc.1.2.5","title":"Improving Family Functioning with Social Skills Training: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychosociological Research in Family and Culture","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Training (meteorology); Social skills; Developmental psychology; Applied psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.21880323426212187,"score_gpt":0.4496914897710686,"score_spread":0.23088825550894673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396530320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934603,0.0017822582,0.0005717385,0.00019802511,0.00009554558,0.0023938462,0.00010172716,0.000015845037,0.0013806318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99113137,0.0027457296,0.0022143023,0.0002325708,0.00013059645,0.0027793464,0.0001454901,0.0000063965967,0.00061411486],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99139434,0.006542306,0.00062898925,0.0003797073,0.00074955245,0.00030511152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98389417,0.011763099,0.0017858741,0.0011350777,0.0008013593,0.00062049745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0112193115,0.0004383635,0.000815992,0.0005073311,0.0009501989,0.0006836844,0.0007055017,0.00077370706,0.0050602215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018465212,0.0004192149,0.0006610967,0.0004571869,0.0013829706,0.00062772265,0.00048210332,0.00061131467,0.00041937976],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11201864,0.5385153,0.049306974,0.0082515655,0.0028789178,0.00027673726,0.007916353,0.00060441834,0.006406292,0.00078075094,0.0008951149,0.272149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07103812,0.7035277,0.20349498,0.0028266564,0.0020381128,0.00025705688,0.003871441,0.0010480046,0.0045987326,0.00061379006,0.006608425,0.00007697863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022558104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00292278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0112193115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004959461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018306812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0593341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396530555","doi":"10.22215/etd/2023-15901","title":"Capitalism and Patriarchy are Kicking My Butt: A Feminist Political Economy Analysis of Women’s Freedom and Domestic Labour","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Capitalism; Politics; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014411689416478385,"score_gpt":0.29774185844546774,"score_spread":0.28333016902898933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396530555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43632317,0.00522801,0.007733066,0.05239214,0.00012858016,0.0000738123,0.00009687881,0.000024477544,0.4979999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924804,0.00066769903,0.0002624846,0.0004283156,0.000038075475,0.000020511872,0.000010303634,0.000009887904,0.0060821753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710566,0.0017941662,0.00002823882,0.00012863276,0.0002997492,0.0006434657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809664,0.0012695983,0.00024038542,0.00010824506,0.00009541777,0.00018972685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027414372,0.00035716622,0.00028526626,0.0019961067,0.0101396395,0.009479107,0.0010172215,0.0015723925,0.0029877024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029515813,0.00025253874,0.00026073202,0.0022410366,0.064823195,0.0071016783,0.0041283793,0.0019044118,0.0001812198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024396362,0.000018770601,0.0024323938,0.000041550138,0.000004022512,0.00025819216,0.24247439,0.0002371773,0.0001603115,0.74557894,0.0015413277,0.007228527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024477305,0.00003980614,0.016770583,0.0003667479,0.000014873673,0.00021904949,0.36886132,0.00092305284,0.00053437357,0.37715244,0.23505755,0.00003570977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09215803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11165577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09215803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021104457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077710557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18324322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396582010","doi":"10.51989/nul.2024.1.19","title":"GENDER PARITY POLICY IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE SYSTEM IN NORTH AMERICA","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Ukrainian Law","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parity (physics); Public service; Political science; Business; Public administration; Physics","score_opus":0.04090750957353752,"score_gpt":0.3006321092673021,"score_spread":0.2597245996937646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396582010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69690907,0.008637093,0.0021457681,0.06282702,0.00039911544,0.00004785735,0.00008296371,0.000054996337,0.22889611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97854334,0.0015946393,0.00039352,0.0016915846,0.00006867049,0.000018927294,0.00002405903,0.000008169755,0.017656907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971814,0.001105407,0.00007662523,0.00018215706,0.00046163332,0.0009927428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982015,0.0006381111,0.0002965679,0.000050139894,0.0004485337,0.00036523968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019309638,0.000092508955,0.00012280204,0.0010040317,0.006459204,0.003853875,0.0006057699,0.0012484584,0.004085607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029660335,0.00016122755,0.00016986512,0.0013349984,0.0039946246,0.0016100201,0.0024182599,0.0012369008,0.00020848833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006372445,0.000117275864,0.04030549,0.00017954616,0.000018574096,0.0013595218,0.053745687,0.0012425293,0.0015037782,0.7715825,0.016581599,0.11329974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019951274,0.00019034161,0.24522303,0.000653961,0.000038639613,0.0008133519,0.14729857,0.0022887655,0.002347146,0.069748916,0.5312892,0.00008811036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13784212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1427089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13784212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016793849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017778482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27407956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396625434","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae012","title":"<i>Managing Federalism through Pandemic</i>, by Kathy L. Brock and Geoffrey Hale","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Federalism; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Law and economics; Economic history; Economics; Medicine; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02347726187068172,"score_gpt":0.2848828852118721,"score_spread":0.2614056233411904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396625434","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008220751,0.33212745,0.0006340853,0.48722494,0.047715325,0.000039562434,0.00033940916,0.0002316239,0.13086554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029085215,0.3391695,0.0012917775,0.08443862,0.041764576,0.00009979574,0.0004456581,0.00042845853,0.5032764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873596,0.00029987103,0.00006817206,0.00012296357,0.00060473353,0.00016828877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972983,0.0008862344,0.00027213764,0.00011391913,0.0006154984,0.0008139629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021481856,0.00075989973,0.0004623384,0.0013935242,0.0032419208,0.0063920356,0.0007637311,0.00328502,0.061350156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071182195,0.0005046718,0.0004355002,0.0022177906,0.003465101,0.009570205,0.0033914994,0.003803074,0.020668799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000433689,0.000002759528,0.00006580823,0.00006922454,0.0000010888191,0.0000088652205,0.00038510907,0.000011019926,0.000029879058,0.0024629089,0.98228735,0.014671701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017816725,0.0000050358663,0.0003728813,0.0003209694,0.0000019387128,0.000043287753,0.00075819466,0.000011775715,0.00003364075,0.0014177342,0.9970271,0.0000057941684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031352866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06307305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061350156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004924291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0088180285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20523673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396627542","doi":"10.2307/jj.14443769.17","title":"Feminist Perspectives on Young Mothers and Young Mothering:","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Demeter Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03560536811798322,"score_gpt":0.2734083322188437,"score_spread":0.2378029641008605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396627542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037645623,0.103692174,0.0022451326,0.061301637,0.002694704,0.00003898303,0.00007205386,0.00006175849,0.7922481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5655514,0.06752793,0.0013724659,0.016596166,0.0012209421,0.00019939934,0.00004200969,0.0000772152,0.34741244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921715,0.00056699966,0.000007693825,0.000028096398,0.00008726329,0.00009269226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994282,0.00040440084,0.000053957174,0.000011578513,0.000032522144,0.0000693225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011334065,0.0003948866,0.0001878252,0.00038099362,0.0056029335,0.0031443632,0.00043720103,0.0011159915,0.0042652683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009338088,0.0001229587,0.000096791635,0.0005240426,0.009212286,0.0020676916,0.0016470733,0.0017739006,0.0006058317],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020929318,0.000024021108,0.0006193029,0.00019102842,0.0000025512086,0.00090500485,0.30980062,0.00007793096,0.0002735513,0.58777726,0.07268355,0.0276242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004384718,0.000015071744,0.00067701493,0.00062101794,0.000002407584,0.00050420704,0.086747214,0.00004408818,0.00016175737,0.02190183,0.88931584,0.0000052158234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008170047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016399754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008170047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030228028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020983056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021932065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396731091","doi":"10.1111/caje.12710","title":"Measuring physicians' response to incentives: Labour supply, multitasking and earnings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval; University of Toronto; Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Human multitasking; Incentive; Earnings; Economics; Substitution effect; Substitution (logic); Labour economics; Function (biology); Supply; Labour supply; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Accounting; Computer science","score_opus":0.08476266071378698,"score_gpt":0.2131620676144866,"score_spread":0.12839940690069962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396731091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99790096,0.00008150324,0.00033573198,0.00016498513,0.0000019776928,0.000015706513,0.0003366528,0.0000027279514,0.001159709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994036,0.000017066139,0.00019496288,0.000015616593,0.00000229734,0.000006043779,0.00007861797,5.2861753e-7,0.00028135712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867755,0.00050877035,0.000071318704,0.00011399054,0.0004100106,0.00021836888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98665476,0.0067747138,0.003990926,0.00041298146,0.001098112,0.0010685789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025718259,0.0001735448,0.00026571954,0.0006881583,0.00049403735,0.00069162884,0.000453531,0.00042034715,0.0027800775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014200988,0.00009423598,0.00018550217,0.00086247583,0.00043129586,0.0002260157,0.00044204356,0.00023324479,0.00021291069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009472578,0.000058780857,0.9910842,0.00001979142,0.000026817299,0.000036106107,0.00043166662,0.0013917881,0.0003417217,0.00017824938,0.00025293714,0.006083189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038662697,0.000030731615,0.9979043,0.0000066056105,0.0000038826897,0.000014912728,0.00032903792,0.0013154087,0.00009291399,0.000119072276,0.00017499988,0.0000043348423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26756617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36197317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26756617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028647413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024791604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5320175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396777269","doi":"10.1017/9781800108868.013","title":"Women, Work, Earnings and Family","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economics; Engineering; Accounting; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.018831180882802976,"score_gpt":0.26481579586058746,"score_spread":0.24598461497778448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396777269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20730436,0.16250375,0.00044473135,0.14288685,0.004844508,0.00009242975,0.001057417,0.00008837439,0.48077762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8341932,0.06659779,0.00021360128,0.011858514,0.0015318859,0.00009215245,0.00022162478,0.00004224865,0.085248865],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984262,0.00062646996,0.000037431975,0.000082728235,0.00021815138,0.0006090368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824893,0.00022139365,0.0002070395,0.0000406001,0.00014683203,0.0011352485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014618246,0.0003434475,0.0004957034,0.001315872,0.007939721,0.0059376345,0.0007309657,0.0008854855,0.018733855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003919963,0.00014048092,0.00019309088,0.0022739312,0.0037310591,0.0031176496,0.0041408543,0.0014391375,0.0019298485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015390126,0.00041259607,0.099349424,0.0004208068,0.0000692276,0.0027402448,0.11506775,0.00025854778,0.00011499996,0.10344292,0.37384695,0.30412254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023538296,0.00014266036,0.10745062,0.0027232154,0.00002127309,0.0017076366,0.23748897,0.00006105468,0.00005602431,0.027321711,0.62293875,0.00006455392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036226656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058758713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036226656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027987782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004429833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07203162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397013053","doi":"10.4324/9781003101895-13","title":"Indian Women","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.031154191025565305,"score_gpt":0.2674005984490362,"score_spread":0.2362464074234709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397013053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007873114,0.005151554,0.0002476986,0.006106535,0.00087983004,0.00005065458,0.00018865186,0.00007632495,0.9794256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06703352,0.006555583,0.00032046,0.0040823086,0.00018342774,0.00005454986,0.00011148683,0.000079347476,0.92157924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990445,0.00008244407,0.000012705566,0.000070871094,0.00025537683,0.0005341248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966645,0.00003533249,0.000015852806,0.000021545819,0.0001391366,0.00012159993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004458948,0.00060273573,0.00032542655,0.0011956642,0.016005443,0.005473862,0.00088052487,0.0010786082,0.04090741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008105256,0.00025469906,0.0002990034,0.002475922,0.0038973598,0.0015014011,0.0025441733,0.0022633902,0.009850093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036850866,0.000055906017,0.0026357837,0.00019842836,0.0000064177825,0.0010368405,0.111877434,0.00006550422,0.00077670877,0.44464803,0.34884676,0.0898153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001278883,0.0000033874182,0.00087075256,0.000060346763,0.000002697324,0.00013771105,0.014218963,0.0000093304225,0.000072682145,0.0010728969,0.9835443,0.000005541251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6519425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82325953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6519425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013741171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019799665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70021456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398152009","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4834635","title":"Childcare Regulation and the Fertility Gap","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Business; Economics; Political science; Demographic economics; Medicine; Environmental health; Population","score_opus":0.011086022043415321,"score_gpt":0.2673097893101038,"score_spread":0.2562237672666885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398152009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9204227,0.005131257,0.00039469358,0.015767409,0.0000993816,0.00001253347,0.00036450886,0.000008313472,0.057799168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99807125,0.0004851546,0.00002677969,0.00021555128,0.000032201187,0.0000047656868,0.000026752963,0.0000018792541,0.0011357075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891114,0.0004901692,0.000029832312,0.00007885542,0.00010275598,0.00038721733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959288,0.0021908751,0.00091896846,0.00012363638,0.00016692128,0.0006708086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018477038,0.00006554678,0.00023223512,0.0008364784,0.0011178704,0.0015831912,0.00036824177,0.00085035904,0.0120122945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059388843,0.0000788442,0.00018527538,0.0009958256,0.0019174636,0.0010549709,0.0016671822,0.0008491582,0.00031633495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007105034,0.0006776585,0.4735421,0.00012142762,0.000057103673,0.0008706602,0.017851232,0.0012189015,0.00066967146,0.41756725,0.0063622454,0.08035121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010518823,0.00031158232,0.7680867,0.00038533466,0.00004947976,0.0008209253,0.059314623,0.0015204931,0.0006951556,0.11244037,0.05622699,0.000043242995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006300539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0082182195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0120122945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010789806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019848468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040185153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398755781","doi":"10.1257/pandp.20241105","title":"The Impact of Family Tax Benefits on Children’s Health and Educational Outcomes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AEA Papers and Proceedings","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Public economics; Business; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.017913572550079443,"score_gpt":0.3141952864463582,"score_spread":0.2962817138962788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398755781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98824304,0.0013169353,0.000056168345,0.0017070381,0.000018554938,0.000015412274,0.0027647226,0.000005449084,0.0058725793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980286,0.00042287543,0.000063467705,0.00009518151,0.000007667858,0.0000053561475,0.0005620574,0.0000018560359,0.0008130071],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826175,0.000315431,0.0000373462,0.00010944986,0.00038627334,0.0008896763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99562055,0.0009895711,0.0012596729,0.00017203893,0.0008303822,0.0011279113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016066954,0.0001697623,0.00030657786,0.0010863345,0.0014801783,0.0012666549,0.0006567527,0.0003563399,0.0031290222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068145245,0.00010367018,0.0004561461,0.0017635209,0.00091020524,0.0004043778,0.0010049136,0.0011063194,0.00013224283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106309446,0.000060898183,0.984846,0.00001690601,0.00010800448,0.00011487975,0.00042120228,0.0005063171,0.00005129833,0.0009252533,0.0012337146,0.011609251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005524499,0.000021964412,0.9977963,0.000023061706,0.0000319802,0.00002451373,0.0006711566,0.0001272164,0.00005405732,0.00008745572,0.001152999,0.0000038132337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.925383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96856916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.925383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0150873875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014159727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15011287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398778836","doi":"10.1515/9780776637990-007","title":"4 A Single Mother Returns to Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.03329039491273854,"score_gpt":0.21615816610855482,"score_spread":0.18286777119581626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398778836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015389595,0.010154614,0.00038940037,0.050977506,0.0029649937,0.000055492088,0.0005883455,0.00007853435,0.91940147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03526269,0.0026579092,0.0001658843,0.004201661,0.000074940166,0.000010789651,0.000057056623,0.000037827893,0.95753115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993943,0.000039578987,0.0000083245795,0.00006618758,0.00013990747,0.00035173405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999529,0.00004679013,0.000014620606,0.000021509066,0.00019993102,0.00018811341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037920088,0.00039183442,0.00035169214,0.00070190313,0.019644577,0.0040599504,0.000878378,0.0028061913,0.07862369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010339258,0.00031039026,0.00032195853,0.0010244182,0.0023269441,0.0014193417,0.0017112414,0.0039129774,0.008397609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004620926,0.000029382005,0.0027227984,0.00008531912,0.0000063410407,0.001323679,0.009860547,0.0001196324,0.0003303679,0.20516099,0.7051181,0.07519681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025339982,0.0000066705575,0.0016326682,0.000084091465,0.000003883784,0.00013684988,0.005787906,0.00002479973,0.00012360491,0.0014734583,0.9907122,0.000011348526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9682882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99195826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07862369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02761428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058827043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26302242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398807552","doi":"10.7910/dvn/tdu5ps","title":"Replication Data for: Attanasio OP, Oppedisano V, and Vera-Hernández M. (2015). Should Cash Transfers Be Conditional? Conditionality, Preventive Care, and Health Outcomes. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(2), 35–52.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Global Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Conditionality; Replication (statistics); Cash; Health economics; Economics; Political science; Actuarial science; Business; Health care; Welfare economics; Medicine; Finance; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.0785753175024229,"score_gpt":0.3697252594461406,"score_spread":0.2911499419437177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398807552","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002610551,0.00009171388,0.00010303992,0.00024761143,0.00009568649,0.00003264551,0.9982508,0.00026776703,0.0006496794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013703966,0.000112489375,0.00049295544,0.000090510664,0.000029150613,0.00026773574,0.9961105,0.0001237421,0.0014025593],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845254,0.00031737075,0.0002533669,0.00036455577,0.000373096,0.0002389468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99265856,0.0017819395,0.00080009067,0.0019207139,0.0022899285,0.0005488338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004175658,0.001910546,0.0013156809,0.0035321298,0.00091038994,0.0030175878,0.0037319488,0.0019781562,0.12319444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031106029,0.00085002737,0.0016524894,0.005350699,0.00068615313,0.0018489046,0.0026764697,0.0025665017,0.09269339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067925284,0.00002387312,0.0016574322,0.0004961123,0.000040899566,0.000023734034,0.0000383377,0.0001415088,0.000041512278,0.0004446261,0.9951957,0.0018283773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017670721,0.00004792969,0.016192911,0.0008509445,0.000097064985,0.00011728242,0.00027575108,0.0006330204,0.00030571225,0.002433559,0.9772084,0.000070369286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05225008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077065356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12319444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001779256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003715157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41212648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399091661","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781447347736.003.0001","title":"What does work-based welfare reform mean for women?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Policy Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare reform; Welfare; Work (physics); Political science; Economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Demographic economics; Engineering; Market economy; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.05680109402379767,"score_gpt":0.31103909372436045,"score_spread":0.25423799970056277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399091661","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018219396,0.06752656,0.0010120216,0.55627286,0.004550517,0.000040792638,0.00010020465,0.000042186388,0.3522355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57396317,0.11159063,0.001211587,0.12878025,0.0047665057,0.0003494902,0.00018164041,0.00010407223,0.1790527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849737,0.0007272827,0.000024096573,0.00009915964,0.0002299821,0.00042215633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946374,0.00029820204,0.000053855652,0.000024913825,0.000058263286,0.000101001024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020117757,0.00023010794,0.0002848738,0.0005190812,0.0048123323,0.007187459,0.0005726323,0.002236215,0.009198943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032730806,0.0001370702,0.00028189024,0.0008730058,0.009153338,0.0061339163,0.0024736759,0.0026341947,0.0013497993],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003180671,0.000048587768,0.0011765762,0.0003362136,0.000007172166,0.00011804335,0.031978752,0.00007555379,0.00014297952,0.7704603,0.10343539,0.0921886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009210885,0.00003302895,0.002110836,0.0009869166,0.000008119783,0.0001074972,0.042681824,0.00003782994,0.00016740694,0.06939785,0.8844505,0.000008925521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00895009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012714654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009198943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053591644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051924908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038883567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399143455","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.05.003","title":"Bargaining between the sexes: outside options and leisure time in hunter-gatherer households","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution and Human Behavior","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of British Columbia","funders":"Leverhulme Trust; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Economics; Labour economics; Welfare; Subsistence agriculture; Leverage (statistics); Division of labour; Social capital; Population; Demographic economics; Redistribution (election); Sociology; Geography; Demography; Market economy; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.03793612649857791,"score_gpt":0.31291519855284805,"score_spread":0.27497907205427013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399143455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945633,0.00026274612,0.00014905618,0.000324811,0.0000038710264,0.0000028309805,0.00009330215,0.000001169653,0.004599043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997364,0.00013327709,0.000057541067,0.00002622415,0.0000050623216,0.0000040586765,0.000051229646,0.0000013795302,0.0023572685],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995378,0.00021251358,0.000016946911,0.000053898082,0.000036082525,0.0001427406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838483,0.000945651,0.00028835764,0.000056814293,0.000046100933,0.00027829796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007924659,0.00010289881,0.00025637966,0.0005022422,0.0008531412,0.00111637,0.00028726325,0.00059410866,0.01930841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028857521,0.00018752312,0.0001629364,0.0006327873,0.0007015638,0.0010205718,0.00070064503,0.00037829517,0.0007583159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008963914,0.0005017338,0.86736625,0.000089769776,0.00010609925,0.0011746341,0.03989989,0.0012957148,0.001035648,0.018920273,0.004445921,0.064267576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003844869,0.00020242388,0.8526564,0.00013411748,0.000044788507,0.0005108502,0.11822139,0.0029892798,0.00024521875,0.018943721,0.005965776,0.00004759979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006758958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019026881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01930841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025596566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022301327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06459308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399259217","doi":"10.61838/kman.jprfc.1.4.6","title":"Changing Perceptions of Marriage and Family Life Among Millennials","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychosociological Research in Family and Culture","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Social psychology; Family life; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.13371159812239944,"score_gpt":0.4282657930170274,"score_spread":0.294554194894628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399259217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962606,0.0014439238,0.00016296629,0.0007820226,0.00003264268,0.0000067774135,0.000023083421,0.0000027062679,0.0012851028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985108,0.00079061603,0.00015015359,0.0001956201,0.000009378095,0.000009186809,0.000015107998,0.0000017355012,0.0003175061],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985362,0.000800849,0.000079264326,0.00013979748,0.000184517,0.00025939554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775606,0.00055643986,0.00055253314,0.00007172578,0.00023989125,0.000823392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037128965,0.00023101585,0.00032797147,0.0007410125,0.0027402006,0.0020642872,0.00055332476,0.00055776973,0.0018897383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064262785,0.0002022318,0.00030353226,0.00037247696,0.0021821216,0.0023192645,0.0041317134,0.0013092421,0.00011514849],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116999545,0.00009541659,0.22348723,0.0002803337,0.00005735266,0.0019017714,0.7295327,0.00008958389,0.001829576,0.0024346504,0.0011349391,0.03903935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053396952,0.00030355778,0.18272805,0.00038816282,0.00002404613,0.001205168,0.80297476,0.00006893403,0.00029307083,0.00063832407,0.0113309845,0.000039593568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034840486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005850124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037128965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010179874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094014494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019635916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399451863","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4854544","title":"Spousal Labor Supply Adjustments to Extended Benefits Weeks: Evidence from Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.016105891958705966,"score_gpt":0.278662161819369,"score_spread":0.262556269860663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399451863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886518,0.0013699861,0.000088888104,0.0012014174,0.000025347294,0.00003250206,0.0038849215,0.0000069096814,0.0047383485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922465,0.0012783274,0.00008315059,0.00022336339,0.000014736952,0.000021216556,0.0019581458,0.000009558483,0.004164968],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976985,0.0002790884,0.00008465111,0.00026112175,0.00063806085,0.0010385028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98955244,0.002095271,0.0027709294,0.0004972425,0.0031175679,0.0019665256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001748196,0.00027097913,0.0006596322,0.0015041442,0.004146161,0.002324322,0.0020075287,0.0010474405,0.007076774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011170013,0.00041489792,0.00057617086,0.0058186906,0.0017106658,0.00066104287,0.0016303011,0.0013999502,0.00041035554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069130945,0.00017124275,0.9698766,0.00008965426,0.00018192503,0.0001971225,0.0064276205,0.0005186428,0.00014580593,0.0015376922,0.004713595,0.015448747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002380373,0.000028736913,0.99070215,0.00006299855,0.0000397912,0.000015528267,0.0055785985,0.00015798943,0.00004515578,0.00013395584,0.003195903,0.000015325726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99688303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024843277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024843277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03705751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18025142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399631356","doi":"10.1016/j.rssm.2024.100950","title":"Earnings trajectories of individuals in same-sex and different-sex couples: Evidence from administrative data","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; McGill University; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Earnings; Demographic economics; Psychology; Business; Economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.3250779465169531,"score_gpt":0.487088787508564,"score_spread":0.1620108409916109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399631356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98441875,0.0007926696,0.00023530604,0.00039566105,0.000011230405,0.00002179387,0.012260193,0.000007640176,0.0018567656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98515344,0.0007574322,0.00027831455,0.000112125206,0.000009027442,0.000025829779,0.013157813,0.000004962738,0.00050099177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981458,0.0003367007,0.00022438176,0.00029128822,0.0005660313,0.0004357499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98938084,0.001823482,0.004387316,0.0010604564,0.00238843,0.00095948443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024524564,0.00019243857,0.0003328663,0.002357188,0.0017671282,0.001106566,0.0012910787,0.00041151454,0.0014843182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012346005,0.00027228022,0.00046765443,0.006406819,0.0006675752,0.0009275312,0.0016512052,0.00097568735,0.0003893308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040813567,0.000020320278,0.9956436,0.000017521017,0.00004156896,0.00001974182,0.0007308206,0.00006306451,0.000017411796,0.00020220596,0.00060950144,0.002593514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029748185,0.000011724057,0.9976139,0.000026528483,0.000013574515,0.000020239666,0.0011449009,0.0001652636,0.000027257898,0.0000899663,0.00087782263,0.0000059488793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7956775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8526899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7956775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028605654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045258403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41105157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399770597","doi":"10.1556/032.2024.00012","title":"Unpaid work, paid work and gender inequality: An analysis of time transfer accounts for Turkey","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Oeconomica","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu","keywords":"Work (physics); Inequality; Labour economics; Unpaid work; Economics; Time-use survey; Gender inequality; Transfer (computing); Paid work; Demographic economics; Sociology; Working hours; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0402965345523464,"score_gpt":0.3003337399163156,"score_spread":0.26003720536396924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399770597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922186,0.0004337061,0.00033917543,0.00008532421,0.000010555559,0.000015876598,0.004781141,0.0000168181,0.0020988104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945604,0.00014331791,0.00012563454,0.000008482228,0.000008552269,0.000016096117,0.0042930455,0.000006152753,0.00083838194],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997248,0.000041596817,0.000022849172,0.000045621557,0.000059806032,0.00010528196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993212,0.00019205791,0.00022866594,0.000046235265,0.00014381317,0.00006808216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038775714,0.0002804368,0.00036306688,0.002321353,0.0003746747,0.000807397,0.00041161163,0.00024627533,0.003977144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001145419,0.00012398123,0.0005710639,0.0032027634,0.00016819267,0.0004260998,0.00060687365,0.00030580195,0.00059588364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024157563,0.000086541295,0.9618853,0.000104696206,0.0001383546,0.000594176,0.0013833285,0.0045802165,0.0002601507,0.00204813,0.0045963363,0.024081241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037390719,0.000035351648,0.9851431,0.000035769932,0.000049718405,0.00011755026,0.0024161441,0.0074700364,0.00013911421,0.00029608383,0.004281203,0.000012060552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07331802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043018337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07331802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014117938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006951364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14578247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399851039","doi":"10.61959/s2876856c","title":"Family Change and Diversity in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Geography; Evolutionary biology; Biology; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.1052288100658278,"score_gpt":0.2942356079259648,"score_spread":0.18900679786013702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399851039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9288308,0.005433347,0.0001869536,0.010050226,0.00014445056,0.000113680675,0.005401977,0.00003286416,0.04980566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884511,0.0024559996,0.00026140822,0.0005305649,0.000018860797,0.000030205158,0.0010059834,0.000009090551,0.0072367843],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997924,0.00017195972,0.000051380375,0.0001686051,0.0006096356,0.0010744255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948343,0.00023426955,0.00034455056,0.00014168762,0.0021092286,0.0023360015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012355044,0.00017556871,0.00032462366,0.0028205228,0.01677899,0.0030877404,0.0013819772,0.00043687213,0.0050978446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037544218,0.0002086665,0.00037286954,0.006549877,0.0021067255,0.0008693227,0.0031687599,0.0010913258,0.00019123226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019034653,0.00015478753,0.7059884,0.00020227299,0.000104391045,0.0013803076,0.06567179,0.00069021666,0.00047248177,0.011876209,0.038571503,0.1746973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001043423,0.00002485745,0.91128796,0.00018225069,0.000012693244,0.00019951904,0.04171233,0.00021638058,0.0000922605,0.0006923472,0.045529068,0.000040016002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99892753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09614398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09614398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10857436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6975767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399986808","doi":"10.3386/w32612","title":"One Cohort at a Time: A New Perspective on the Declining Gender Pay Gap","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Cohort; Gender pay gap; Demographic economics; Demography; Economics; Sociology; Labour economics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.43454428350764723,"score_gpt":0.5302683436242822,"score_spread":0.09572406011663498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399986808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9094861,0.011102374,0.009211067,0.033306114,0.0004402672,0.000029238123,0.0016921051,0.000042714848,0.034689896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903492,0.0030362736,0.0009343983,0.0014597713,0.00026232444,0.000016570133,0.0002285269,0.000021128199,0.003691964],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993625,0.00016461432,0.000022939279,0.0001687337,0.00010385492,0.00017720126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772984,0.0011015759,0.00045864496,0.00017540384,0.00017368434,0.0003609031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024702004,0.00026919643,0.0006251361,0.0015403772,0.0010178476,0.0018997209,0.00077736337,0.00079112925,0.008692488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059433957,0.00013499663,0.000640693,0.0011227871,0.001352338,0.0023930091,0.0014042023,0.0012217119,0.00047590554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003253268,0.00016034105,0.64947087,0.00021027967,0.000100519974,0.0014627293,0.02259435,0.002780573,0.0010051399,0.21408728,0.008575435,0.09922712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004669612,0.00054450677,0.74456215,0.0004750636,0.00015050021,0.0013118434,0.04487245,0.006897312,0.00070226187,0.09711198,0.10323383,0.00009138595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030706443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026575876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030706443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011974889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018473854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06105542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400004705","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4874256","title":"One Cohort at a Time: A New Perspective on the Declining Gender Pay Gap","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Cohort; Demographic economics; Political science; Demography; Psychology; Economics; Medicine; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.028976059834805282,"score_gpt":0.30617738109395926,"score_spread":0.277201321259154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400004705","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25567243,0.014314326,0.0071971277,0.6496913,0.00286274,0.000024659446,0.0004911271,0.000027507058,0.069718845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96039087,0.008086213,0.0009795416,0.016780281,0.003422351,0.000044407567,0.00007951052,0.00003291999,0.010183891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987627,0.0004815367,0.000034752702,0.00019186255,0.00015138445,0.00037780806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99492365,0.0030108867,0.0004224118,0.00024484418,0.00030677204,0.0010914032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048749824,0.0002732406,0.00056972407,0.0019307074,0.002701157,0.0042647277,0.0012088134,0.0035900187,0.010458343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009375485,0.0002055781,0.0003835491,0.001691742,0.0069772755,0.0098089,0.0033497817,0.004800987,0.0004097514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011661195,0.00013923865,0.034281157,0.000077792545,0.0000138126825,0.00056560826,0.038954575,0.00040935757,0.000284527,0.8595017,0.015911972,0.04974362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004410836,0.00030087438,0.052647263,0.0006664469,0.000035618163,0.0013455036,0.13788812,0.00287013,0.00029430698,0.6345914,0.1692259,0.000090363385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014577015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017319765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014577015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021125306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003866053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034986675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400441608","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2024.11969symposium","title":"Decoding the Fabric of Gender Inequality: Psychological Factors and Social Contexts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Decoding methods; Social inequality; Inequality; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.08604449125790678,"score_gpt":0.36246338793329835,"score_spread":0.27641889667539155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400441608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8446463,0.0052353125,0.004662148,0.051433403,0.00063763955,0.000025575997,0.000099606434,0.000021279557,0.09323871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961904,0.0010031803,0.00026861505,0.0010518997,0.00008607506,0.000011111837,0.000011792311,0.000007883817,0.001368965],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858785,0.00081816386,0.000033118322,0.00011819457,0.00020739954,0.00023534798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980064,0.0011965503,0.00029576916,0.00008025907,0.00015492606,0.0002661535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026102928,0.00021927078,0.00028414818,0.0010708163,0.0038489648,0.0058615413,0.00036815013,0.0006958095,0.0035428132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048535005,0.00015468326,0.00017293378,0.0009009998,0.012027143,0.004153602,0.0050099157,0.001741031,0.00016702425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087141496,0.0001048552,0.1030299,0.00016554365,0.000030891206,0.00052257755,0.44141972,0.00028535415,0.0016376199,0.3442318,0.009015884,0.09946876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000088237375,0.000112518646,0.13130282,0.00046032065,0.00002280633,0.00026001173,0.67110735,0.0006332045,0.0005814885,0.14111972,0.054344255,0.00004665483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047569354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074997693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058615413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017472053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015381874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013804734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400714657","doi":"10.1787/5415dcea-en","title":"Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Taxing wages","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social security; Payroll; Cash; Public economics; Government (linguistics); Economics; Cash transfers; Business; Payroll tax; Income tax; Labour economics; Finance; Accounting; Market economy","score_opus":0.0227961081447175,"score_gpt":0.24371678990875656,"score_spread":0.22092068176403906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400714657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009992927,0.0029431395,0.00042030026,0.001874371,0.0005753157,0.000048210804,0.022771925,0.00047325715,0.9698942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015854671,0.0012437658,0.00041554729,0.00028190154,0.00001937709,0.000011814652,0.00419493,0.00012534276,0.9921218],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994172,0.000018192059,0.000017345446,0.0001279696,0.00033436727,0.00008486432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917775,0.000059191803,0.000024250394,0.000056418656,0.00057762733,0.00010479682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025171204,0.00072505546,0.000562896,0.0015983065,0.004450701,0.0039551724,0.0010697693,0.0011459073,0.5603086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010026499,0.0004380245,0.00035502648,0.0042169713,0.00051242736,0.0014099744,0.0010613514,0.0011497566,0.28303558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036842244,0.000019804591,0.00071257306,0.00016573834,0.000005393217,0.00014409747,0.00023334323,0.00009770853,0.00030234343,0.015041953,0.89119536,0.0920449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018295074,0.0000020861335,0.0005801485,0.00003086731,9.23739e-7,0.000026516042,0.00007595782,0.000022109602,0.000054571905,0.0003509383,0.9988507,0.0000033977549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72375494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89606017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5603086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0099435095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015911303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400823345","doi":"10.4324/9781003300014-11","title":"From Girls to Mothers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.026404355757683847,"score_gpt":0.2787376762231234,"score_spread":0.25233332046543955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400823345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018147161,0.017654397,0.0007723942,0.018658321,0.003311269,0.00007515813,0.0002284661,0.000060976694,0.9410919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13730106,0.02062654,0.00048573493,0.0077555003,0.0009807247,0.00013283442,0.0001556755,0.00013989239,0.832422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950886,0.00015331099,0.0000124134585,0.0000949133,0.00010918142,0.00012132987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978954,0.00006868713,0.000018215123,0.000016282278,0.000041958257,0.00006536581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005061701,0.00052685256,0.00033840808,0.00057602755,0.005572646,0.004398281,0.0006536623,0.0010333803,0.039396025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011345439,0.00026770247,0.00021889871,0.00058311975,0.002525379,0.0032209042,0.0043779216,0.0031526363,0.009259414],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048554644,0.00013303751,0.0026222684,0.00027845663,0.000007632582,0.0016396503,0.16749437,0.00006416381,0.001037189,0.4468613,0.22036317,0.15945022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035018286,0.000013326543,0.00038313377,0.00018250673,0.0000015030428,0.00020453491,0.017215995,0.0000057472907,0.00013953217,0.003849645,0.9779985,0.0000021524015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00555207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00939291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039396025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021070905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017815643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13179278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400929963","doi":"10.1111/cjag.12368","title":"Milk, money, and gender: Exploring the link between women's decision‐making in dairy production and welfare investments in boys versus girls","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Welfare; Production (economics); Milk production; Economics; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Animal science; Biology; Market economy","score_opus":0.056672257635566464,"score_gpt":0.22809851516258123,"score_spread":0.17142625752701476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400929963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99910516,0.00009420974,0.000027616114,0.000057482153,0.000001987892,0.0000014929556,0.00005609182,3.2098092e-7,0.00065558526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995209,0.000036671066,0.000026218027,0.000009461391,0.0000013681775,0.0000026498897,0.000027012433,5.532768e-7,0.00037520792],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959856,0.00016592673,0.0000138392115,0.000047789217,0.000045154793,0.00012870129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981681,0.0009646361,0.00047859314,0.00004714966,0.00006467517,0.00027677353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000764205,0.00019267302,0.00023063707,0.00047272324,0.0004491358,0.00091595674,0.00028433817,0.00030512805,0.0052930103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028182182,0.000168879,0.00028598408,0.00053691806,0.0005940458,0.0004054006,0.00064726715,0.0004320961,0.00027727176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106624146,0.000074158816,0.99246746,0.00001257709,0.00003038191,0.000089687426,0.0031193055,0.00007704329,0.00022741604,0.00045346038,0.000089352005,0.0032525691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036858119,0.000096831835,0.99067396,0.000015817935,0.00001340345,0.000069915506,0.008067627,0.00021834965,0.00010997922,0.00022370103,0.0005020718,0.000004692529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008989845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012958799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004534288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003535461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017875016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401412704","doi":"10.32920/26523934","title":"For Black Women, Health Care is an Abolition Issue","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.03675153380087833,"score_gpt":0.3633587268675263,"score_spread":0.326607193066648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401412704","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09925193,0.003821285,0.0023373296,0.6759861,0.0022134532,0.000032781856,0.000097569304,0.00005691488,0.21620265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8655461,0.003361602,0.0017141659,0.07358172,0.00090905756,0.000051585866,0.000044590957,0.000083926636,0.054707367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99517846,0.0016688374,0.00009003574,0.00034128394,0.0012069464,0.0015144404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995398,0.0014387132,0.0006904667,0.00025577768,0.0006597458,0.0015573142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004235897,0.00018235078,0.00037503507,0.00053559337,0.023513256,0.0076802126,0.00074768806,0.0032716915,0.014315914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008301351,0.00025339666,0.00026859855,0.0009420808,0.027269242,0.0036382282,0.006702295,0.005839216,0.0008330025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003521058,0.00005282579,0.012972925,0.00015033392,0.000020496842,0.00045501476,0.14319073,0.00007277061,0.00087076775,0.6914382,0.075380206,0.07536053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013810744,0.000041098414,0.014380144,0.0005678912,0.000018038321,0.00042530574,0.20352383,0.000086540684,0.0004103843,0.069238976,0.7112449,0.00004911889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24819113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3386372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24819113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012489335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03161363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49349296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401412749","doi":"10.32920/26523934.v1","title":"For Black Women, Health Care is an Abolition Issue","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Black women; Political science; Sociology; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03675153380087833,"score_gpt":0.3633587268675263,"score_spread":0.326607193066648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401412749","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09925193,0.003821285,0.0023373296,0.6759861,0.0022134532,0.000032781856,0.000097569304,0.00005691488,0.21620265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8655461,0.003361602,0.0017141659,0.07358172,0.00090905756,0.000051585866,0.000044590957,0.000083926636,0.054707367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99517846,0.0016688374,0.00009003574,0.00034128394,0.0012069464,0.0015144404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995398,0.0014387132,0.0006904667,0.00025577768,0.0006597458,0.0015573142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004235897,0.00018235078,0.00037503507,0.00053559337,0.023513256,0.0076802126,0.00074768806,0.0032716915,0.014315914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008301351,0.00025339666,0.00026859855,0.0009420808,0.027269242,0.0036382282,0.006702295,0.005839216,0.0008330025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003521058,0.00005282579,0.012972925,0.00015033392,0.000020496842,0.00045501476,0.14319073,0.00007277061,0.00087076775,0.6914382,0.075380206,0.07536053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013810744,0.000041098414,0.014380144,0.0005678912,0.000018038321,0.00042530574,0.20352383,0.000086540684,0.0004103843,0.069238976,0.7112449,0.00004911889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24819113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3386372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24819113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012489335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03161363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49349296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401777575","doi":"10.1177/02627280241272432","title":"Heteronormativity and its Private and Public Balancing in Sri Lanka","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South Asia Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heteronormativity; Sri lanka; Gender studies; Political science; Business; Public administration; Sociology; Queer; South asia; Ethnology","score_opus":0.08271387583133846,"score_gpt":0.37523601924967825,"score_spread":0.2925221434183398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401777575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82375234,0.0028634742,0.00086522626,0.006456007,0.000049448678,0.000030422289,0.0000203051,0.000016858066,0.16594575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982401,0.0003918409,0.00009546416,0.00011069949,0.0000061752344,0.0000097918755,0.0000030917643,0.0000034501127,0.001139372],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958788,0.0027338283,0.00014133786,0.00028903814,0.00035154575,0.0006054127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987074,0.00054488704,0.00029615615,0.00021118046,0.000106036816,0.00013419468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002931415,0.00026663468,0.00039621923,0.000933453,0.010948316,0.0073519456,0.0005353084,0.00082012586,0.001909637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018918351,0.00025201825,0.00021190112,0.0012342981,0.038989417,0.0026364569,0.006446377,0.0016514567,0.00013176075],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037458612,0.000023991191,0.0072403583,0.00007900911,0.000018240677,0.001018915,0.64083016,0.00009542404,0.00062212156,0.3384551,0.00080221833,0.010777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011614233,0.000063462954,0.022633674,0.00027319463,0.000033028078,0.0009169661,0.8905049,0.00021961523,0.00036863607,0.03801551,0.046914328,0.00004511163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026492791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03789128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026492791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054999813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004004937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052677214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401809656","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v13i1.71193","title":"Economic Policy Trends: The Gendered Implications of an Infrastructure-Focused Recovery: Issues and Policy Thoughts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic recovery; Economics; Natural resource economics; Public economics; Political science; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.042331170711045016,"score_gpt":0.3365714932529902,"score_spread":0.29424032254194515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401809656","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011880586,0.013313436,0.00026980942,0.89169943,0.0017267991,0.000008675797,0.00019740469,0.000017133349,0.08088679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52859724,0.049414974,0.0012759496,0.31757692,0.0030588743,0.0000550643,0.00046329477,0.000060787916,0.09949687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826306,0.00032463434,0.000022046688,0.00010247574,0.00048561956,0.0008021616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979074,0.00059750763,0.000118551885,0.000040839364,0.0007252266,0.00061049877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027248557,0.00030341683,0.00027548047,0.0011142865,0.0077015483,0.009603949,0.001639496,0.005275513,0.012658756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030258005,0.00013697939,0.0003526302,0.0019675237,0.008694514,0.0045679323,0.0018701126,0.0064312182,0.00083335064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045090153,0.00006571794,0.007404506,0.00024250717,0.000013814408,0.0003273319,0.01469552,0.00035542168,0.00035382944,0.5712643,0.35041538,0.054816514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010970719,0.000025736492,0.022519203,0.00091761054,0.000018308307,0.00013625009,0.09319493,0.00027622594,0.00022847146,0.0537638,0.8288629,0.000045541543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66312176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78322077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66312176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029737934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039535012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67772436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401958956","doi":"10.56397/sssh.2024.08.02","title":"Impact of Gender Equality Policies on Women’s Career Mental Health and Well-Being","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Science & Humanities","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Gender equality; Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.11951706481166019,"score_gpt":0.4261743398659556,"score_spread":0.3066572750542954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401958956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80430484,0.00516849,0.00057723845,0.06601572,0.0005003855,0.00010092456,0.00069314736,0.000029246143,0.12261004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99186194,0.0012078775,0.00016441528,0.0031012965,0.00004180191,0.000025341522,0.00008484442,0.0000059644826,0.0035065345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936242,0.001418564,0.00007238012,0.00018257913,0.0010051434,0.0036970708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925815,0.0012963676,0.00075211906,0.00015388876,0.001351676,0.0038644944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037883753,0.00020968527,0.00029602143,0.0010234592,0.009857146,0.003799421,0.0008633515,0.0010430381,0.00561257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008729917,0.00012815792,0.0004985361,0.0010374765,0.0038739995,0.0011471043,0.004779473,0.0023421783,0.00021854234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049938523,0.0007674051,0.48470017,0.0004932694,0.0002199481,0.00096524524,0.08856186,0.0019261495,0.0014688272,0.11278763,0.034166954,0.27344313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063349864,0.00022858156,0.6772194,0.001370054,0.000115491035,0.00015601442,0.1491478,0.0006460229,0.0009517309,0.008426728,0.16157402,0.000100807454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8744959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9343068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8744959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044693023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.103691354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3242721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402285468","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v11i1.53165","title":"Social Policy Trends: Paying for the Essentials: Shelter, Food and Energy Consumption by Household Income Quintile for 2010 and 2016","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Economics; Food consumption; Public economics; Demographic economics; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Agricultural economics; Social science","score_opus":0.07090517521745547,"score_gpt":0.3499363518726912,"score_spread":0.2790311766552357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402285468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79393727,0.0042823777,0.0003042623,0.011068812,0.0002674493,0.000076434946,0.15775253,0.0001786926,0.032132033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88575524,0.0036176944,0.00080218015,0.0010095041,0.00009645629,0.00006626373,0.067864,0.000031725416,0.040756978],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995189,0.000027209213,0.000026185067,0.000040030016,0.00020816109,0.00017958372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991561,0.00003865547,0.00015633118,0.00001944355,0.00036178852,0.00026770539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035561013,0.00024666428,0.00019132528,0.001379404,0.00076189404,0.0011124176,0.0007834067,0.00043500832,0.005102403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011482965,0.00017116468,0.00041820045,0.0043362486,0.00038383147,0.0005293518,0.0009412926,0.0006837258,0.00049534964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033384937,0.000093656934,0.8466544,0.00042059555,0.00013778065,0.00018327625,0.00221927,0.00093822327,0.00061962695,0.0041805087,0.091444485,0.052774422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007829548,0.000015299554,0.97605366,0.00005515912,0.000017693126,0.00003358177,0.0022903073,0.00021969709,0.00009741016,0.00017394393,0.02102735,0.000008027996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9601613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03983867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011851205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014262077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08598691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402285813","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v11i1.44203","title":"Social Policy Trends: Social Assistance Caseloads in Alberta by Family Composition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Composition (language); Social policy; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Law; Art","score_opus":0.0409555020705369,"score_gpt":0.3512208196158905,"score_spread":0.31026531754535364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402285813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89621025,0.0018538274,0.00037481627,0.0030865187,0.000101989885,0.0001641211,0.066144526,0.00031905156,0.031744733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.929074,0.0022698233,0.0005627623,0.00060546375,0.000056171,0.00011305355,0.048263308,0.00006218061,0.018993247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982596,0.00006827381,0.00007255707,0.00017129154,0.0007307947,0.0006974995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996151,0.00026287232,0.000853256,0.000107649095,0.001624581,0.0010007035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009023701,0.0003890138,0.00031210599,0.0056234454,0.001550376,0.0015398382,0.002276401,0.0005291246,0.009007262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038075496,0.00031614563,0.0005925357,0.006749195,0.00088903244,0.00079712365,0.0014724812,0.0009973086,0.0008629124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022407787,0.00009787072,0.9281728,0.00012395898,0.00008156609,0.00022675708,0.0018057293,0.0007643249,0.00037518505,0.0013829937,0.040034473,0.026710235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009579832,0.000014835738,0.9912066,0.000052785446,0.000011359203,0.00007420636,0.0019110778,0.00037419298,0.000057035068,0.0000737826,0.0062021846,0.000012378204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9821395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98895836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023976397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023976397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022243833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17396176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402286526","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v11i1.61656","title":"Social Policy Trends: Domestic Violence and the Holidays","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Demographic economics; Political science; Suicide prevention; Economics; Poison control; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.04061643278610445,"score_gpt":0.36029882452187545,"score_spread":0.319682391735771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402286526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8140243,0.006729083,0.00044275224,0.014847177,0.00067440583,0.0000697355,0.11027416,0.00020038852,0.052737903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92786217,0.0046733096,0.0003276463,0.00092317525,0.00052003586,0.00006640965,0.053119343,0.00006944231,0.012438351],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951077,0.00005210863,0.000051644227,0.000066590386,0.00012492345,0.00019406715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976853,0.00019494552,0.0010452425,0.000064979446,0.0005552824,0.0004542351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037485085,0.00022745851,0.00024286371,0.0025743456,0.0007021902,0.0018886233,0.00041956388,0.0005262232,0.0119051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022356173,0.00013409677,0.00037710278,0.0058265883,0.00041197395,0.0011538129,0.0010629016,0.0010699217,0.0013491401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001852934,0.00010436151,0.8737005,0.00059700775,0.00016225559,0.00017981102,0.0026172344,0.00057105167,0.00037415556,0.0049997596,0.07607908,0.04042946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027772123,0.00001996565,0.975418,0.00008191461,0.000008840645,0.00003543851,0.0024195977,0.00012817407,0.000066213346,0.00013199466,0.021681756,0.000005457727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19772832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29171404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19772832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019476959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019873078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39315486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402317321","doi":"10.1017/s1744552324000181","title":"The social construction of childhood: is a minimum age of marriage attainable in plural societies?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Sociology; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01858541913049665,"score_gpt":0.3188866371314921,"score_spread":0.30030121800099546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402317321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6906622,0.0042562387,0.015373757,0.022102771,0.00019570687,0.000050923412,0.00008534673,0.000047937672,0.26722503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984049,0.00028378368,0.0004416113,0.00011826254,0.000017680512,0.000006055916,0.000007330385,0.0000063096545,0.0007139892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936469,0.004551939,0.00017220428,0.00045600295,0.00051753025,0.0006553304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956054,0.0017707896,0.00092724484,0.00048004216,0.00046915928,0.00074722467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063961884,0.00020086621,0.00033609092,0.0013750009,0.00899429,0.007487835,0.00078735186,0.0013440037,0.0024590795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006064097,0.00025773695,0.0001948252,0.0010671873,0.06134516,0.0051857186,0.007065247,0.0022657337,0.00014480093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020379672,0.000020869766,0.0048651304,0.000039128463,0.0000043438854,0.00023493363,0.23304091,0.00012812112,0.00042637973,0.75370264,0.00043756052,0.007079603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000118504,0.000104208324,0.017700262,0.00065459806,0.00001859367,0.000667497,0.49632093,0.0004905818,0.00085172406,0.36766553,0.11545869,0.000055444463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010587908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010645192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010587908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005610651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041544107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040708244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402369910","doi":"10.5771/9781442248632","title":"Beyond Marriage","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.022455191943601596,"score_gpt":0.2650360953830297,"score_spread":0.2425809034394281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402369910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00079367333,0.021006705,0.001060073,0.011213807,0.0039390023,0.000019500385,0.00007466626,0.00007419536,0.9618184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01595535,0.010727716,0.0008662199,0.0073909992,0.0013759448,0.000035014855,0.000084751344,0.00013226773,0.9634319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934644,0.00019184602,0.000019304674,0.00011451378,0.00021965906,0.00010821947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975914,0.00006766205,0.000014679235,0.000033700842,0.00005606503,0.00006880403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003675857,0.0005487731,0.00038657847,0.00080681755,0.0045900624,0.0049857763,0.00075545243,0.0018102239,0.06815161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010691518,0.00020086928,0.00038286415,0.0008016049,0.0039122603,0.005717343,0.0044391043,0.0037744755,0.026300104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013789705,0.000017287162,0.00012301019,0.00009875159,0.000002458106,0.0001323185,0.00547111,0.00005627265,0.0001361051,0.6025257,0.31154057,0.07988266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.793494e-7,0.0000030966023,0.000034141118,0.00005316419,4.4693653e-7,0.000046784622,0.0004136881,0.000006966199,0.000018237723,0.00948687,0.98993486,0.0000012279384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051212185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011963955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06815161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002087855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022661467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22798985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402983212","doi":"10.3138/chr.105.2.br17","title":"<i>A Liberal-Labour Lady: The Times and Life of Mary Ellen Spear Smith.</i> Veronica Strong-Boag.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Spear; History; Art; Art history; Ancient history","score_opus":0.023236732181979435,"score_gpt":0.26023448896661333,"score_spread":0.2369977567846339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402983212","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045104083,0.7699387,0.00008088672,0.18334757,0.011812848,0.000009330318,0.00016996198,0.00002496194,0.03416458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024901219,0.69554824,0.0002799375,0.09790447,0.007078766,0.00004665825,0.00026947062,0.00014051906,0.17383075],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889296,0.00031127065,0.00003056362,0.00008567588,0.00045747453,0.00022201237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815494,0.0006073603,0.00012688861,0.000047009406,0.0006762628,0.00038757178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013551267,0.0010052995,0.0007337476,0.0021071415,0.011859338,0.0046506645,0.0017878074,0.0035620097,0.017696567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037230153,0.0004684609,0.00032756524,0.0052385135,0.0057364795,0.004964791,0.0025238504,0.005980642,0.0039949394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013408995,0.000002985256,0.000119263605,0.0002849277,0.000002966876,0.00008956085,0.0035768629,0.000008308305,0.000027553751,0.0062617417,0.9742958,0.015316556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013656239,0.0000020046093,0.0006101228,0.00070961413,0.0000031267555,0.000096295924,0.006019819,0.000004269466,0.00003094653,0.0007633164,0.9917521,0.0000069457087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6772175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8840334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6772175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015915262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026428917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64936686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403300652","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4948651","title":"The Social Construction of Childhood: Is a Minimum Age of Marriage attainable in Plural Societies?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Sociology; History; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Demography; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00746679655440211,"score_gpt":0.26805055638312353,"score_spread":0.2605837598287214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403300652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7600491,0.0025797316,0.007304163,0.02426155,0.00016687551,0.00004458907,0.0002318705,0.00004002985,0.20532206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818355,0.0002460809,0.0006100024,0.000077284654,0.0000261833,0.000010479568,0.00002920529,0.0000063698517,0.0008107631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970323,0.0014675276,0.00012652525,0.0002489417,0.00027287682,0.0008517432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99270153,0.002086166,0.0015105624,0.0006576939,0.0009234173,0.0021205426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005302063,0.0001873955,0.0005237832,0.001140175,0.006269465,0.004549123,0.001149046,0.0015666418,0.004569264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01295828,0.00038424224,0.00027270164,0.001231115,0.014512218,0.0058438685,0.004528492,0.002210468,0.00034835626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016030714,0.000097617434,0.03651256,0.00010637948,0.000014746829,0.00033346418,0.106081076,0.00026191282,0.0010620395,0.82419103,0.001446462,0.029732341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037373502,0.0002845742,0.17931162,0.0005550555,0.00003316285,0.00086088834,0.24746779,0.0006034746,0.0010416183,0.5166804,0.053051326,0.00007283817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008295109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014753372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008295109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030730346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066930125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02804029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403581799","doi":"10.5430/rwe.v15n1p1","title":"Women Labor Force Participation and Its Impact on Economic Growth: A Study of Latin America and the Caribbean Region","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in World Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Caribbean region; Development economics; Caribbean island; Economics; Geography; Economic growth; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.08375723658693805,"score_gpt":0.394466950776082,"score_spread":0.31070971418914395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403581799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992188,0.0013274654,0.00002166574,0.0012057329,0.000011555855,0.000016525537,0.00006296819,6.277823e-7,0.0051654647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963575,0.002073655,0.000033055858,0.00035895707,0.0000125330625,0.00003271661,0.000049298196,0.0000020100038,0.0010802456],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999308,0.00032373157,0.00003054464,0.000037046113,0.00006859527,0.00023213295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989623,0.0004061984,0.00023630202,0.000026121512,0.00015258013,0.00021654826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017212001,0.00020395039,0.00030488582,0.0013879978,0.0026998369,0.0019224636,0.00039040862,0.0004868669,0.002585236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002942898,0.0001930062,0.00027629908,0.0024192077,0.0011341517,0.001185692,0.0020085138,0.00063754414,0.00015404474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007861286,0.0003788921,0.67477936,0.00025868238,0.000052194933,0.00125578,0.29545543,0.000052668962,0.000506879,0.0022539604,0.001795593,0.023131961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007114794,0.000093017654,0.39280167,0.00044299176,0.000023756389,0.000268771,0.5934283,0.00006129889,0.0000696882,0.00021282308,0.012576928,0.000013617605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.115510255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20006418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115510255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018742702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002879984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22967583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403684027","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4957260","title":"The Welfare Reform’s Effect on the Occupational Employment Distribution of Single Mothers in the US","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Distribution (mathematics); Welfare; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Mathematics; Market economy","score_opus":0.011684872067031862,"score_gpt":0.2767065243984635,"score_spread":0.26502165233143166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403684027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99414307,0.00028381817,0.000019271492,0.003059811,0.000015763444,0.0000023533569,0.00014016105,0.0000012307077,0.002334609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893206,0.00012206996,0.000008745417,0.00022516,0.000011261984,0.0000033317738,0.000048867325,0.0000011319693,0.0006473205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986767,0.00039444707,0.000039211434,0.00008805594,0.00013624928,0.0006653654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840754,0.0003954647,0.0005650858,0.00005095802,0.0001643689,0.00041657515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013503658,0.00007704252,0.00026381697,0.000881917,0.0016183902,0.0010238766,0.00052466086,0.0006216724,0.006007447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003382182,0.0001290956,0.00025742606,0.0012775523,0.0010284524,0.00072959193,0.0018357211,0.0009420885,0.00027373157],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009346207,0.0004970161,0.92318934,0.000052797433,0.0000804233,0.0005084751,0.015753275,0.00043218196,0.0011888281,0.009121058,0.005481676,0.04276021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017461309,0.00009890175,0.9721757,0.00004128453,0.000018971486,0.00007163356,0.022872768,0.00015535408,0.00028840563,0.0006724565,0.0035800326,0.000006991144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09260625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15967686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09260625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021700417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019174087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18413442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403746158","doi":"10.1111/caje.12737","title":"Home production and time use in an epidemic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Work (physics); Inequality; Pandemic; Economics; Time allocation; Demographic economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Labour economics; Microeconomics; Disease; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.11432575571574864,"score_gpt":0.21863127169000077,"score_spread":0.10430551597425212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403746158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9748556,0.00048997847,0.009239623,0.001197061,0.000022202063,0.000031367486,0.0005228932,0.00002877512,0.013612636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981635,0.00009821795,0.00022250305,0.000020514986,0.0000046799996,0.0000064339383,0.000032390446,0.0000025075185,0.0014492476],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973446,0.00011985444,0.000008254023,0.000038047165,0.000020407448,0.00007903949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908066,0.00045320098,0.00022084755,0.000046694313,0.000045707136,0.00015293286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006543847,0.00022924997,0.00032936205,0.0004025075,0.00037150408,0.0013579302,0.00047046976,0.0007060394,0.008362023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025944556,0.00020384812,0.00030378328,0.00036597345,0.000848078,0.00073008786,0.0008458783,0.00039931433,0.00034108476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011472616,0.0008100415,0.47106257,0.00020190523,0.00024731483,0.0018747204,0.0051098643,0.23428619,0.0084964875,0.22098942,0.005223549,0.05055062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010954304,0.00063298154,0.38288674,0.00018239398,0.00012808602,0.00072398945,0.013222799,0.40531868,0.0017187953,0.17809993,0.0168644,0.00011168367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007977075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056292987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008362023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013437395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036049206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027973771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403767379","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4997699","title":"Nonbinary Gender Identities and Earnings: Evidence from a National Census","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Simon Fraser University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Earnings; Demographic economics; Geography; Political science; Demography; Sociology; Business; Economics; Accounting; Population","score_opus":0.027671162313862272,"score_gpt":0.30553423085076536,"score_spread":0.27786306853690307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403767379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933114,0.00028581632,0.00011672476,0.00025508457,0.000007089143,0.000006740654,0.003376902,0.0000018205383,0.0026384704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99459547,0.00045017895,0.00007427893,0.00005180285,0.000008145089,0.0000102559125,0.0032992272,0.0000019219376,0.0015085831],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999258,0.0002706996,0.00005974015,0.00008477242,0.00014825095,0.00017844676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99116755,0.0022348072,0.0041994634,0.00055581005,0.0011572067,0.00068510434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011319186,0.00014437684,0.00022856204,0.0009954898,0.00083121966,0.0009255167,0.00054642226,0.00031399282,0.004285554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073628244,0.00021735803,0.0001992764,0.003443053,0.0004473088,0.0011278699,0.001151252,0.0005990692,0.0006672159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101558755,0.000059554095,0.99341935,0.000016835917,0.000036805617,0.00004216438,0.0009912344,0.00007043913,0.000052015836,0.00054713455,0.0010317923,0.0036310274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004689608,0.000024165382,0.9956542,0.000015160721,0.0000144990845,0.000024110343,0.0026631912,0.00013440836,0.00004701186,0.00016341459,0.001251346,0.0000036742867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13142683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26093128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13142683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005591521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007382344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26132363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403796399","doi":"10.1111/sjpe.12403","title":"Household decisions and the gender gap in job satisfaction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scottish Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"Government of Alberta","keywords":"Economics; Job satisfaction; Labour economics; Gender gap; Demographic economics; Management","score_opus":0.04794835425764498,"score_gpt":0.30841336644211553,"score_spread":0.26046501218447055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403796399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961391,0.00008714535,0.00018233685,0.00023383617,0.0000041153107,0.000002379264,0.00020313365,0.0000018747434,0.0031460081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998135,0.000010035394,0.000012674051,0.000008467047,0.0000013316528,6.8508865e-7,0.000030085212,2.516275e-7,0.00012296259],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950504,0.00017161224,0.000018651663,0.000049166556,0.00008552357,0.00016986026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973557,0.0012319426,0.0007014051,0.00010057704,0.00018744126,0.00042300444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012413326,0.000082315484,0.00020724346,0.0005900304,0.0005579061,0.000760151,0.0001859573,0.00026934996,0.007263173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038601407,0.00006087722,0.00014754385,0.00063620665,0.0006658159,0.00032429607,0.0005888829,0.00026670206,0.0003055123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013526359,0.000101292484,0.9826805,0.000011188081,0.000025791638,0.00012346936,0.0014701535,0.00053440244,0.00022662587,0.0056816284,0.00061139057,0.008398316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007721113,0.000055205925,0.9906591,0.000014638442,0.000005762456,0.00006472268,0.0043473667,0.0012997822,0.00012488563,0.002538797,0.0008758899,0.0000061154233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020287735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021930808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020287735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005659269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000423005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04033929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403819496","doi":"10.3386/w33075","title":"Nonbinary and Transgender Identities and Earnings: Evidence from a National Census","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Census; Earnings; Demographic economics; Geography; American Community Survey; Political science; Genealogy; Demography; Sociology; History; Business; Economics; Accounting; Population","score_opus":0.3996518829931276,"score_gpt":0.5243282550710922,"score_spread":0.12467637207796456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403819496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9518942,0.0016749117,0.0003167541,0.00096265774,0.000033894314,0.000045095872,0.03278206,0.000011915793,0.012278412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98126733,0.0015273449,0.00025094577,0.0001530206,0.00001734843,0.000030190282,0.014501753,0.0000071134764,0.0022450453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911255,0.000159889,0.000075755604,0.00010924195,0.00032460116,0.00021804168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99351054,0.000734414,0.0025947117,0.00048050354,0.0020987042,0.00058121694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008855142,0.00016255635,0.00018289372,0.0014490603,0.0008651546,0.00075170025,0.00061674434,0.00017199873,0.0040593008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074121896,0.00015812411,0.0002159515,0.0031477846,0.00040901557,0.00055090326,0.001200648,0.00041280797,0.00041990585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000718987,0.000027310756,0.987003,0.00004589136,0.00003706029,0.000035631285,0.00066274096,0.0000580322,0.00006347132,0.0006673763,0.0035416873,0.0077858563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040713326,0.0000069563575,0.99625623,0.00003427159,0.0000139576005,0.000025529034,0.00097511517,0.000082819846,0.0000492108,0.00009509442,0.0024525232,0.000004102928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71272504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8338082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71272504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013315444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002817942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57793355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403875799","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5001356","title":"Nonbinary Gender Identities and Earnings: Evidence from a National Census","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Simon Fraser University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Earnings; American Community Survey; Demographic economics; Geography; Sociology; Business; Demography; Economics; Accounting; Population","score_opus":0.027671162313862272,"score_gpt":0.30553423085076536,"score_spread":0.27786306853690307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403875799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933114,0.00028581632,0.00011672476,0.00025508457,0.000007089143,0.000006740654,0.003376902,0.0000018205383,0.0026384704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99459547,0.00045017895,0.00007427893,0.00005180285,0.000008145089,0.0000102559125,0.0032992272,0.0000019219376,0.0015085831],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999258,0.0002706996,0.00005974015,0.00008477242,0.00014825095,0.00017844676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99116755,0.0022348072,0.0041994634,0.00055581005,0.0011572067,0.00068510434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011319186,0.00014437684,0.00022856204,0.0009954898,0.00083121966,0.0009255167,0.00054642226,0.00031399282,0.004285554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073628244,0.00021735803,0.0001992764,0.003443053,0.0004473088,0.0011278699,0.001151252,0.0005990692,0.0006672159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101558755,0.000059554095,0.99341935,0.000016835917,0.000036805617,0.00004216438,0.0009912344,0.00007043913,0.000052015836,0.00054713455,0.0010317923,0.0036310274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004689608,0.000024165382,0.9956542,0.000015160721,0.0000144990845,0.000024110343,0.0026631912,0.00013440836,0.00004701186,0.00016341459,0.001251346,0.0000036742867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13142683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26093128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13142683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005591521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007382344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26132363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403995316","doi":"10.1787/c9048b15-en","title":"Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Taxing wages","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social security; Payroll; Public economics; Cash; Government (linguistics); Economics; Business; Cash transfers; Labour economics; Finance; Accounting; Market economy","score_opus":0.02111517130689948,"score_gpt":0.25063645845414795,"score_spread":0.22952128714724845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403995316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000969317,0.0028898113,0.00041368962,0.0018608029,0.0005700071,0.000046817597,0.02164504,0.0004686113,0.9711358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015351017,0.0012179837,0.00040775305,0.00027574247,0.000019311405,0.0000115781,0.0040142187,0.00012460529,0.99239385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941885,0.00001823162,0.000017282598,0.00012775033,0.00033369218,0.00008420741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918145,0.000058678364,0.000024058001,0.000056084602,0.00057562557,0.000104028884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002520944,0.0007258602,0.0005621379,0.0016068406,0.0044264966,0.0039523295,0.0010732674,0.0011475808,0.56430614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010035589,0.00044013967,0.0003577189,0.004165657,0.00051496644,0.0014210795,0.0010705517,0.0011578833,0.287224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036574034,0.000019622952,0.00069353223,0.00016427215,0.000005299943,0.00014233933,0.00023145945,0.00009709485,0.00030231796,0.015287232,0.89040405,0.09261606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018041135,0.0000020533437,0.00055547873,0.000030573134,9.1066096e-7,0.000026142532,0.00007382718,0.000021768372,0.000053757707,0.00035150372,0.9988789,0.0000033215304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7155036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89262617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56430614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00997915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015691243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404024931","doi":"10.22215/cujs.v3i1.4846","title":"Fairness and Responsibility in Couples' Financial Discussions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton undergraduate journal of science.","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.018530621255774943,"score_gpt":0.30856961332594457,"score_spread":0.29003899207016964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404024931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97200406,0.0008798382,0.0017523699,0.0019560547,0.00011305375,0.000026974178,0.000017495877,0.000012507735,0.023237688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988803,0.00009577587,0.00018060097,0.00009271519,0.000022674774,0.00000940405,0.0000038675125,0.000002619594,0.0007120232],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902084,0.0080081215,0.0002336107,0.00025804152,0.0008254329,0.00046635824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820051,0.01118372,0.0037869846,0.0006216337,0.00073622563,0.00166629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008579484,0.00016751818,0.00024172157,0.0008047728,0.0036163894,0.002447997,0.00041690998,0.00076532626,0.0046511083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03947095,0.00020349157,0.00022809395,0.0003190816,0.00281847,0.0015589256,0.0029944216,0.0010422182,0.00021461153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009463268,0.00084131333,0.40032786,0.000264071,0.00008483964,0.0012279405,0.34115258,0.0005120224,0.0022469335,0.024722679,0.0022783186,0.22539511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022015646,0.0011622877,0.5067416,0.00060236093,0.000118887445,0.0032050868,0.37726754,0.0027025815,0.0027694139,0.04593402,0.05910561,0.00017047729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015088078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016767852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008579484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011967364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013316015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04537314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404177705","doi":"10.1086/733932","title":"Identity Economics and Intrahousehold Bargaining","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Development and Cultural Change","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Economics; Neoclassical economics; Sociology; Labour economics; Positive economics; Public economics; Art","score_opus":0.06649634409985651,"score_gpt":0.27882062232290317,"score_spread":0.21232427822304667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404177705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69478697,0.0010482867,0.038949907,0.0056899185,0.00008060814,0.000070006914,0.00013934771,0.000025684936,0.25920925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930535,0.0002349841,0.00075237727,0.00009426262,0.000025427024,0.000014721422,0.00001541571,0.0000025870222,0.005806726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920887,0.00033217372,0.000019309715,0.00007887524,0.00013838494,0.00022240431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979748,0.0010483144,0.0004991855,0.00019040875,0.0000911108,0.00019614748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017691541,0.00015893842,0.00029954407,0.0009684473,0.0016916767,0.0021361804,0.00051705015,0.00070437073,0.01698664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037950827,0.00013793884,0.00032863033,0.00104314,0.004909124,0.0016802025,0.0014459939,0.0010698651,0.000687229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005375769,0.00010602515,0.016003551,0.000022767736,0.0000144082915,0.00013927204,0.0007274671,0.0041514467,0.00023735862,0.9605709,0.0009086529,0.017064432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046142955,0.000059111917,0.042465795,0.000041230185,0.00001443412,0.0001336819,0.0029885557,0.013050412,0.00048260903,0.92818916,0.0125100445,0.000018949893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004032794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037063689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01698664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020736074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008981062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056825995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404200135","doi":"10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101195","title":"Beyond backlash: #MeToo and female unemployment trends","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Sciences & Humanities Open","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"American University of Sharjah","keywords":"Backlash; Unemployment; Economics; Psychology; Keynesian economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Economic growth","score_opus":0.09347975377504787,"score_gpt":0.3653744136865925,"score_spread":0.27189465991154466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404200135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939268,0.00047440405,0.000230204,0.0017669057,0.000043547756,0.0000075737535,0.0004782238,0.0000047361004,0.0030676425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989077,0.0001056172,0.000042413383,0.00011559859,0.000029144203,0.0000068432464,0.00015006278,0.0000019200113,0.00064077025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957794,0.00016718303,0.000019170251,0.00005749691,0.000049239592,0.00012904275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987632,0.00039981774,0.0005120833,0.000056404555,0.0001128069,0.00015580689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088505703,0.00011027649,0.0001834131,0.00052125484,0.0006860233,0.0009968627,0.00025376654,0.00051180035,0.0025338058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005001022,0.000057185356,0.00019155984,0.00075546646,0.00048073672,0.0008858437,0.00072114344,0.0006160394,0.0002755714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001632552,0.00009155779,0.9673845,0.00004745057,0.000040824507,0.0001260103,0.0042777928,0.00023884336,0.0002723549,0.0021561934,0.002061435,0.023139704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036199879,0.00012886678,0.9780968,0.00008719763,0.000019314934,0.0000575312,0.01285582,0.000911858,0.0002294341,0.00055712066,0.0070424904,0.000009998358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024812525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035169084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024812525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006574481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049610477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049336195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404297725","doi":"10.1007/s10804-024-09500-y","title":"Integrating Intersectionality and Life Course Approaches: Three Women’s Lives","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Adult Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Life course approach; Intersectionality; Course (navigation); Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Developmental psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03648883713670326,"score_gpt":0.2843967846176609,"score_spread":0.24790794748095762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404297725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96080637,0.0007540408,0.00070932176,0.004299332,0.00007720515,0.000044460096,0.00009683806,0.000017163336,0.0331953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916037,0.00028021217,0.00031464442,0.00029921107,0.000013219652,0.000036237238,0.000056412428,0.000014820141,0.0073815407],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851817,0.00076181797,0.000030655065,0.00010472285,0.00010814371,0.00047638037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977118,0.00077581167,0.00013654122,0.00011287627,0.00028800662,0.0009749376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028344507,0.00039000445,0.0004459943,0.0014238714,0.016642261,0.006881685,0.0009965027,0.0017120971,0.004927119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004543708,0.00038855194,0.0003772166,0.0015865103,0.00837589,0.0042553786,0.007587342,0.0035186354,0.0003939429],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009273844,0.00008136868,0.008065943,0.000021666998,0.0000031830157,0.0005001375,0.9694616,0.000016247575,0.0004124392,0.011234855,0.0008215097,0.009288263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058422843,0.000043104457,0.009539952,0.00003066824,0.0000038282346,0.00022778328,0.96481365,0.00003037548,0.0002578923,0.0012673347,0.023767605,0.000011934887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029080825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04805052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029080825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051230486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003496919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05782312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404592109","doi":"10.1215/00703370-11646286","title":"Why Are So Many U.S. Mothers Becoming Their Family's Primary Economic Support?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Ethnic group; National Survey of Family Growth; Marital status; Demography; Demographic economics; Educational attainment; Psychology; Population; Economics; Family planning; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Research methodology","score_opus":0.017363789889105596,"score_gpt":0.25301949796839673,"score_spread":0.23565570807929115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404592109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.978754,0.0023988918,0.00009308461,0.011773986,0.00019897896,0.000007070716,0.00043799198,0.00001350078,0.006322447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956055,0.0020886066,0.00006576722,0.0010436616,0.0000537224,0.000008066129,0.00015136454,0.000003825637,0.0009793659],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999652,0.0000838252,0.000015429336,0.000056750563,0.00006930675,0.00012271327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989919,0.00022763122,0.00027892969,0.000052304273,0.0001449416,0.00030429297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062836736,0.00013905225,0.00017151544,0.0004925419,0.0014623592,0.0011204494,0.00029545501,0.00043928542,0.003957749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030790167,0.00014999235,0.00014445024,0.00062963465,0.0004605602,0.0008074267,0.0006945275,0.00068577135,0.00039121075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087137385,0.00006140747,0.87245005,0.00006883767,0.000026563443,0.0007451358,0.015135516,0.00004085656,0.00047734057,0.0015938872,0.021349937,0.08796332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000627189,0.00006682428,0.9042585,0.0002024482,0.000022620668,0.00072479463,0.0726067,0.00010525504,0.00029114194,0.0006517574,0.021054287,0.000009489981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039684415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09016285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039684415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000786319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009401019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078906834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404622555","doi":"10.1111/1475-5890.12396","title":"Tax credits and child outcomes: lessons from the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fiscal Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; Tax credit; Economics; Political science; Public economics; International economics","score_opus":0.058281194980187925,"score_gpt":0.31712035898587015,"score_spread":0.25883916400568224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404622555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72880584,0.1519093,0.00035253682,0.03314347,0.0004829301,0.00008280911,0.012197479,0.000027213851,0.07299836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9380906,0.054131463,0.00029999262,0.0015538578,0.00008073706,0.000023204158,0.0021536588,0.00002118014,0.0036453137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998304,0.00026565563,0.000084994914,0.00013037407,0.00048636997,0.00072861835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99084806,0.0016558194,0.000916267,0.00023930102,0.004862922,0.0014776753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024248923,0.00038569022,0.00082170335,0.0030708383,0.0029914107,0.0028190464,0.0013183282,0.0007304039,0.004788386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008271657,0.00019645986,0.00073412043,0.010631505,0.0018143643,0.0008902107,0.0019812626,0.0015759997,0.00025220765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041394457,0.00016508659,0.82855433,0.00073930743,0.0005120137,0.00095731084,0.012891618,0.0013845435,0.00009061713,0.022549095,0.03897621,0.09276597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047550206,0.00006622331,0.9166086,0.00317692,0.00044814465,0.00019026412,0.024889685,0.0005425225,0.00018353903,0.0024333356,0.05131812,0.00009517404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039392788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039392788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055414665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.285816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404708825","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5033674","title":"Identification and Estimation of a First-Exposure Effect in Social Programs: Evidence Against a Welfare Trap","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Trap (plumbing); Welfare; Estimation; Social Welfare; Econometrics; Economics; Political science; Environmental science; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.01678724269924927,"score_gpt":0.30385105517499716,"score_spread":0.2870638124757479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404708825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94999504,0.0007677451,0.037892893,0.0024579559,0.000081903185,0.00024522556,0.00053193286,0.00012178809,0.007905666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919658,0.00017661654,0.0033706282,0.0002850986,0.00006505865,0.00016548259,0.00024865603,0.000019868829,0.0037027847],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793053,0.01579558,0.00056923705,0.0016050787,0.0014335554,0.0012912331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73253703,0.23558174,0.018421711,0.008828046,0.0020665936,0.002565016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029602103,0.0006303041,0.0017223803,0.0016159251,0.0016211678,0.0028754962,0.002349203,0.0037017323,0.012972774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.079450905,0.0005573202,0.0013266249,0.0016520001,0.0024226718,0.0025806464,0.0036346084,0.003543768,0.0006515628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003052155,0.004838677,0.7754442,0.0007815293,0.0018864616,0.00059049274,0.0045599397,0.012007702,0.0014279102,0.061611306,0.0044709453,0.12932864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010739252,0.004570814,0.70976484,0.0008085782,0.0024013608,0.0004419443,0.013752212,0.10390136,0.0076497393,0.14160058,0.013864361,0.00017031695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068081766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070789955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029602103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009414142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020910932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15655273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404726055","doi":"10.1007/s42650-024-00086-0","title":"Declining Marriage Rates and The Collapse of Household Savings 1980–2014","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Economics; Demographic economics; Demography; Labour economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05239679324364625,"score_gpt":0.3291758471472332,"score_spread":0.2767790539035869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404726055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9251451,0.009161875,0.00021151346,0.019897044,0.00029671454,0.000038768332,0.023913307,0.00005219049,0.021283519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836204,0.0030768167,0.00010450133,0.0007192473,0.00008727733,0.000013756661,0.0051779216,0.000013477171,0.0071866456],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888355,0.00004794029,0.00005453151,0.00007981713,0.00023568836,0.0006984984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961183,0.00014799573,0.0007907842,0.00011508982,0.0020759525,0.0007519786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018025065,0.00024163772,0.0004118626,0.002689938,0.003045936,0.002605867,0.0013606373,0.001101949,0.006601579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055732694,0.0003807928,0.0006530054,0.0053535677,0.0012524924,0.001159571,0.0019208374,0.00203605,0.0004611388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066364725,0.00013166579,0.8433445,0.00034961352,0.0002183571,0.00033763546,0.010448796,0.0009941399,0.0003974575,0.01817585,0.063986436,0.06095188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006603231,0.000012103068,0.9697006,0.00011346551,0.000025595891,0.00004371274,0.0041156868,0.0001788389,0.00009660599,0.00023575508,0.025455711,0.000015359577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98921025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030288167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030288167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047398586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21975708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404965084","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13050","title":"Temporary Aid for Needy Families as family policy for first time mothers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marriage and the Family","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"DHHS Office of the Secretary","keywords":"Population; Single mothers; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demography; Life course approach; Welfare reform; Cohort; Welfare; Demographic economics; Psychology; Medicine; Economics; Developmental psychology; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.016257045221711265,"score_gpt":0.2836709427180678,"score_spread":0.2674138974963565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404965084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9357415,0.0023591518,0.002160268,0.016543284,0.00028558602,0.00020446384,0.0015595569,0.0000580661,0.04108824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770572,0.0031416512,0.0025854027,0.00092695287,0.00009335101,0.0002442991,0.00056704844,0.000016171216,0.015367886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956995,0.00014176435,0.000015434956,0.000045552802,0.000057244004,0.00017004908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911314,0.00013475354,0.00025246802,0.000045179633,0.00007512362,0.0003792319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007176255,0.00014247205,0.00009580321,0.00034224597,0.0018702558,0.0013561532,0.00066376314,0.00037621122,0.0070959046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020366304,0.00010724776,0.00019391875,0.00032426702,0.00051976764,0.00092434866,0.0019897816,0.00087692414,0.00030060462],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014087414,0.00069938594,0.49939343,0.00051051966,0.000049358747,0.001953615,0.05144412,0.00074673875,0.0016515019,0.030347986,0.043637026,0.36942554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031974225,0.00045056644,0.48785624,0.0025498457,0.000070793285,0.0022185466,0.17998874,0.001750449,0.0014239119,0.007857996,0.31573805,0.0000628718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019538788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068827726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019538788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002176838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045333784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03885013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405059575","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4988437","title":"Home Production and Gender Gap in Structural Change","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Structural change; Economic geography; Business; Economics; Market economy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03630122079244308,"score_gpt":0.3048869470726419,"score_spread":0.26858572628019883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405059575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708099,0.001151766,0.00069682655,0.003844187,0.000044737273,0.000009370031,0.00027026486,0.000007858239,0.02316513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893886,0.00013845842,0.000029190676,0.000030679566,0.000016067148,0.0000041023086,0.000025890327,0.000002128118,0.0008145732],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912494,0.0003426566,0.000020510828,0.0001253874,0.000073112096,0.00031339636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959596,0.0026957807,0.00048043393,0.00012264606,0.00013485382,0.0006065908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014939422,0.00014807463,0.0003810757,0.0012401709,0.0010769586,0.0017338656,0.00046003723,0.00084356504,0.021041771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061889356,0.00010070142,0.0001887494,0.0017077854,0.0026511336,0.0019995025,0.0019014891,0.00071288785,0.00043269127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013793326,0.0008912671,0.48508337,0.0002605869,0.00011933428,0.0009411574,0.043785077,0.002779851,0.0009196186,0.39568293,0.0050740386,0.063083336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010083821,0.0003147683,0.69970006,0.00021733683,0.000048314138,0.000232923,0.09885838,0.0036105798,0.0006255314,0.18328354,0.012984005,0.000023827895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059970887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007519786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021041771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012350813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010598358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070391774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405075128","doi":"10.1257/jel.20231648","title":"The Changing Identities of American Wives and Mothers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Literature","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Variety (cybernetics); Marriage market; Value (mathematics); Resource (disambiguation); Demographic economics; Economics; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.007819493995954985,"score_gpt":0.26389801967966686,"score_spread":0.25607852568371187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405075128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9124769,0.0035497975,0.0006561235,0.006615156,0.00014676189,0.000008637651,0.00012621285,0.0000065509807,0.076413974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865458,0.0023004503,0.00023867609,0.00061523274,0.000043935037,0.0000064459014,0.000036393914,0.0000040638947,0.010209004],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949443,0.00023689013,0.000009876609,0.00006364051,0.000088417284,0.00010673535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955136,0.0001473265,0.00012868686,0.00003112215,0.000053774147,0.00008779088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012511295,0.00012234678,0.00013533689,0.00087869354,0.0030484449,0.0020583938,0.00033995972,0.00046985014,0.0039703255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002425506,0.00013607266,0.00007717046,0.00093570544,0.0030543385,0.0015360812,0.0014668055,0.00069212535,0.00030833337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019212737,0.00011658105,0.3079972,0.00006566834,0.000032385586,0.0010629935,0.22524785,0.00013639042,0.0013409859,0.24826024,0.015972104,0.19957541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000094773295,0.00007387801,0.37727517,0.00024366182,0.00002361936,0.0008005556,0.32897723,0.00034102512,0.000723323,0.029695729,0.26179913,0.0000372708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017378107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041766524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017378107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013054027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006216081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034553885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405351882","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.348477","title":"Land, Wealth, and Taxation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Natural resource economics; Business","score_opus":0.01698445175007102,"score_gpt":0.2626213515829806,"score_spread":0.2456368998329096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405351882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86420697,0.0020054325,0.032994922,0.004392351,0.000047282916,0.000024455403,0.00024307973,0.000026436468,0.096059136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927205,0.00040011702,0.001101448,0.000043568463,0.000011560823,0.000008445827,0.000015589667,0.000004891455,0.00569387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999038,0.000033327273,0.0000033397125,0.00001680121,0.000013837919,0.000028855558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996722,0.00013479679,0.00008035654,0.000040302744,0.000020415226,0.00005203262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028483116,0.00015128308,0.00019838783,0.00034367823,0.00068422675,0.0012938417,0.00027910795,0.0005155278,0.006033765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010418231,0.00009598152,0.00020831723,0.00041251234,0.0015772058,0.0018100578,0.00084821286,0.00042301568,0.00025671427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025156238,0.0000377213,0.009919586,0.00001984977,0.000011180018,0.00015784775,0.0005345344,0.018922191,0.0007815331,0.9588096,0.0006705324,0.010110203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014268127,0.000045502045,0.013289824,0.00004554676,0.000010024608,0.00012999527,0.0009173984,0.04383605,0.0005436694,0.9309191,0.010232807,0.00001580335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005230345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045538237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006033765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013048247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049312814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020184994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405419776","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5053889","title":"Discrimination and Daycare Choice: Evidence from a Randomized Survey","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Randomized controlled trial; Randomized experiment; Statistics; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.026478935735212466,"score_gpt":0.3196039619484107,"score_spread":0.2931250262131982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405419776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99462247,0.00093504,0.00086323475,0.0003905233,0.00013054626,0.0009363955,0.00080612244,0.000014073969,0.0013016238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965495,0.0004909737,0.00069774705,0.00053331803,0.00009666129,0.00071659946,0.00042608308,0.000006067383,0.0004830042],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.94254756,0.050331578,0.0016631627,0.0023158453,0.0018016954,0.0013401463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.853262,0.115909465,0.017368974,0.009021989,0.0015469079,0.0028906963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025114236,0.0007279529,0.0018237187,0.001029237,0.0013523529,0.0014891508,0.001852666,0.0036668202,0.012389384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06869351,0.0009814481,0.0020418074,0.002068596,0.0032660859,0.0017920946,0.0010629345,0.0022948158,0.001168571],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.50447744,0.04820148,0.3797692,0.0017489676,0.007274148,0.00019357791,0.001779741,0.0010379168,0.00059514027,0.0013065165,0.0028246185,0.05079121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.26412085,0.22235279,0.4733463,0.0013886364,0.008850962,0.0005735276,0.004654711,0.009890719,0.001860672,0.0076354365,0.004922233,0.00040319317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005737624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004250696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025114236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009560206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018333364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1328184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405437691","doi":"10.46692/9781447351726.002","title":"The lives of young fathers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Geography; History","score_opus":0.017937833775763346,"score_gpt":0.28356753372049737,"score_spread":0.265629699944734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405437691","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09223368,0.7533085,0.0033849222,0.04002509,0.004845654,0.00015408859,0.0013074734,0.000080230864,0.10466042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3788694,0.55655277,0.003629662,0.01329617,0.0030100327,0.00040926834,0.0011150518,0.000098566255,0.04301906],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978277,0.0012981382,0.000092000475,0.00018528684,0.00037638156,0.00022057521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983089,0.0009825502,0.00020659453,0.000040889587,0.0002942313,0.0001668579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021491179,0.00045144273,0.0005988289,0.0009838181,0.002493317,0.004356951,0.00066248147,0.0015946901,0.011413506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004311047,0.0003244863,0.00032786268,0.0015067123,0.0016438374,0.003115229,0.002245032,0.0019182758,0.0016615229],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018878271,0.000097490294,0.016639533,0.0052001197,0.000059441307,0.0014840727,0.34216645,0.00033437222,0.0012624866,0.115943775,0.13363265,0.3829908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075718845,0.00011428521,0.013202869,0.009100692,0.0000181514,0.0012197332,0.08854423,0.000042133135,0.0002072703,0.00682811,0.88068134,0.00003359441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007563356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011450728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011413506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001765635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027076493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03818202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405938489","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-01537-4_275-1","title":"The Seymour Sisters and Their Circles","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.02410485507154151,"score_gpt":0.2512378436741842,"score_spread":0.22713298860264272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405938489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017953044,0.009190349,0.0012886932,0.017926447,0.0014851685,0.00003219973,0.00002140279,0.000029293926,0.9520734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30560744,0.0056934874,0.00096505263,0.003165614,0.00048370883,0.00005694688,0.00002434291,0.00006566288,0.6839377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999047,0.00059607154,0.000014284932,0.00007918969,0.00013953738,0.00012385206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936193,0.00025450962,0.00005279733,0.000053453936,0.0000978833,0.00017936503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013053437,0.0003702166,0.0003593072,0.0006370634,0.011092573,0.0056443973,0.000659576,0.0015254682,0.022311665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040331404,0.0002697547,0.00011131864,0.00093361264,0.008105084,0.004419631,0.003664506,0.0037478998,0.002864928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017816013,0.000027014474,0.00025592907,0.000027169026,0.0000015243298,0.00015375459,0.06822291,0.00002244569,0.00009989614,0.85482395,0.047441687,0.028905936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007037928,0.00002089607,0.0004750212,0.00017084055,0.000002237849,0.0002329664,0.059241794,0.00007058951,0.00010648071,0.09017312,0.84949315,0.000005898331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008499035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019856365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022311665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021236816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030731105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07463992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405983338","doi":"10.12681/iccmi.7658","title":"Gender Equality in the Workplace: Women's Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Contemporary Marketing Issues","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Gender equality; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.08034767603711376,"score_gpt":0.3531618730852226,"score_spread":0.27281419704810883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405983338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27412468,0.048578706,0.004404489,0.254785,0.0037520668,0.00004347611,0.00014724747,0.000019486042,0.41414484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95352775,0.013540146,0.00043786262,0.01203585,0.00096594903,0.000029357147,0.000020143478,0.000016119577,0.019426748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739766,0.001474858,0.00003348448,0.00014857748,0.00027842875,0.00066692545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849546,0.00074843026,0.00015949672,0.000028668655,0.00017802377,0.00038986967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028565857,0.0003830832,0.0003540335,0.0011886661,0.0076042786,0.006426495,0.00060307013,0.0023816866,0.00476642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019519848,0.00013424248,0.000240345,0.0009937973,0.010174425,0.0041355626,0.0030439529,0.0023713063,0.00042934273],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068886045,0.00010381364,0.013524944,0.0003355191,0.0000134227585,0.001979724,0.4478364,0.00015953435,0.0009976546,0.45994648,0.014030363,0.061003268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007930894,0.00013340618,0.009140517,0.0007911517,0.0000113619,0.00089099986,0.6133757,0.000099078854,0.00033703374,0.036239572,0.33894834,0.000024879919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012073886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016463356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012073886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003012604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036717188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024007201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406519630","doi":"10.1016/s0029-7437(07)70641-9","title":"10.1016/s0029-7437(07)70641-9","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Demography; Gerontology; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.010890406681267355,"score_gpt":0.21802711513334058,"score_spread":0.20713670845207321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406519630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004654902,0.00042749097,0.00052270724,0.00034977117,0.00023149638,0.00009858375,0.0007025495,0.00065042754,0.9965514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00062991335,0.00020422314,0.00031222773,0.00017749713,0.00006121158,0.00006506277,0.0003713511,0.00014905818,0.9980294],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992473,0.00006588905,0.000065492364,0.00025861562,0.00018716883,0.00017558353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973853,0.00079599884,0.00016949273,0.00028314046,0.00051961286,0.00084642577],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013651229,0.003008724,0.002275758,0.00348903,0.0027810785,0.004601425,0.0041217324,0.006906163,0.991339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019424824,0.001119655,0.0015721276,0.0032999828,0.002559265,0.006044132,0.0036657213,0.0031987515,0.9932827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031149262,0.00031073752,0.0011656815,0.00078806514,0.0000440883,0.00028186996,0.00017253024,0.00045003428,0.0018990177,0.008040587,0.3297183,0.6568175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056431676,0.00013770725,0.001032996,0.0005098077,0.000016859674,0.0003280867,0.00019828104,0.00024318376,0.0003609162,0.0008101138,0.99627656,0.000028925106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050216927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039766356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008660972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001408796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016919426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0123538375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406676272","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5102879","title":"One Cohort at a Time: A New Perspective on the Declining Gender Pay Gap","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Cohort; Gender pay gap; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics; Political science; Demography; Sociology; Labour economics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.023524828580763275,"score_gpt":0.3044958611154781,"score_spread":0.28097103253471484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406676272","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25133905,0.014489276,0.007084732,0.6541989,0.0029167037,0.000024490097,0.00048865844,0.00002734471,0.069430776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9596114,0.008324824,0.0009798036,0.017157538,0.0035247158,0.000044543664,0.00008016888,0.000033242562,0.010243817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876106,0.00048229055,0.000034942106,0.00019114284,0.00015224695,0.00037838667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99487996,0.0030377603,0.00042443443,0.00024526156,0.00031068965,0.0011018355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048879166,0.00027330394,0.00057178177,0.0019339076,0.002709947,0.004278893,0.0012050414,0.0035875072,0.010477907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009419826,0.00020552792,0.00038261534,0.0016987021,0.006983609,0.00983298,0.0033641383,0.0048247236,0.00041232596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117119605,0.0001396388,0.034041207,0.00007901346,0.000013795425,0.000567478,0.039115433,0.00040641022,0.0002838984,0.8587324,0.016277129,0.0502266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043947275,0.00030094586,0.05245107,0.000680279,0.0000353899,0.0013471685,0.13886672,0.002834638,0.00029403417,0.631116,0.17193925,0.00009054881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014511358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017258273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014511358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021233116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038727687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03505206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406867534","doi":"10.1891/jfcp-2023-0148","title":"Comparing Financial Outcomes Among Households Headed by Women, Men, or Both Partners: The Gender Pay Gap Prevails","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Gender gap; Business; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.05584040044733674,"score_gpt":0.32451902149933254,"score_spread":0.2686786210519958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406867534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99864835,0.00017336526,0.00003900921,0.00009292334,0.000010158262,0.0000068899094,0.0002541237,7.4983615e-7,0.0007745459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994572,0.00006937458,0.000021390128,0.000037850725,0.0000090302665,0.000008920695,0.00022908625,5.697108e-7,0.00016659562],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989567,0.0004622561,0.000049358547,0.00008402676,0.0000874326,0.00036026162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984648,0.00058307394,0.00036835702,0.00006946643,0.00012127135,0.0003929381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010532461,0.00024026803,0.00035986424,0.0010590027,0.00073486415,0.00059128413,0.0004145423,0.0006964988,0.00420207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004182665,0.00014692024,0.00059806055,0.0011705674,0.00043691669,0.00094283913,0.0011807722,0.0005843953,0.0002821578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046842083,0.0001944528,0.99423224,0.000017992186,0.00011628074,0.00006670529,0.0004704612,0.000042414416,0.00006132393,0.00015052367,0.0002988053,0.0038804093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025395077,0.00050540856,0.99139446,0.00003890966,0.0001151485,0.00009872749,0.006918639,0.00018895189,0.00009634569,0.00024532937,0.00036447347,0.000008208947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013769634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022624614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013769634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036468584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056714297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027378976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406991643","doi":"10.1017/elo.2024.49","title":"Taxing data when the United States disagrees","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Open","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Università degli Studi di Trento","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.09540188759340276,"score_gpt":0.3398227007786668,"score_spread":0.244420813185264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406991643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055413377,0.0049018394,0.008982995,0.4095075,0.010010189,0.00012081296,0.0012678882,0.0002508142,0.5095445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56812894,0.0032989485,0.004931491,0.36719564,0.0022419384,0.00026748533,0.0012404632,0.00035425284,0.052340835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984046,0.0049770214,0.0012796996,0.0023694457,0.0043253833,0.003002553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810796,0.008396056,0.0014028454,0.003151779,0.005017869,0.000951807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020585699,0.00028929958,0.00078894896,0.0024236296,0.008367672,0.015493004,0.0018659906,0.010219761,0.009900653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038429655,0.00040970845,0.0010517963,0.003822048,0.0077036186,0.009554218,0.009230108,0.014071795,0.0015254319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008584345,0.000039764214,0.0038617144,0.00006896544,0.00004307996,0.00050126965,0.00326538,0.00040869458,0.00025582334,0.817214,0.14332686,0.030928604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037507987,0.000036848804,0.0030996045,0.0007228437,0.000051232342,0.00024721984,0.0049627833,0.00053578836,0.0009808776,0.11412156,0.8751146,0.00008913895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025345705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020279763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025345705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058523538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009856174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1088689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407008630","doi":"10.1080/00220388.2025.2451868","title":"Employer and Employee Preferences for Worker Benefits: Evidence from a Matched Employer-Employee Survey in Bangladesh","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Development Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"RAND Corporation","keywords":"Employee engagement; Business; Employee research; Employee resource groups; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.11841041020913948,"score_gpt":0.3477061693250327,"score_spread":0.2292957591158932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407008630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99877673,0.0000790141,0.00004267823,0.000065405045,0.0000013533552,0.000007874731,0.00031505516,4.6377616e-7,0.00071144634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939215,0.00010852954,0.000036474277,0.00003760078,0.0000015229579,0.000009912245,0.00015616484,4.7493185e-7,0.00025710004],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987803,0.00061470596,0.000093207316,0.00014553801,0.00019482772,0.0001714098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99522555,0.0018691414,0.0020067873,0.00022256102,0.0002201847,0.0004557358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014186815,0.00017348275,0.00024201398,0.0005311164,0.0006546754,0.0006214168,0.0003076457,0.000622777,0.0042915316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004600453,0.000201008,0.000217969,0.0011721066,0.00046023878,0.00036445906,0.00052157586,0.00041806613,0.0005971077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008896829,0.000071146664,0.996336,0.00001526244,0.000032421918,0.00007214236,0.00089967455,0.000043763186,0.00015678388,0.000050676026,0.000101290636,0.0021318786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069273833,0.00008272806,0.9962214,0.00001227473,0.000010266294,0.00004635351,0.0031224417,0.00006792291,0.00004314858,0.000037638267,0.00034339668,0.000005386697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023250127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03802432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023250127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044412204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027180274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0462296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407085247","doi":"10.7256/2454-065x.2025.1.73218","title":"Tax policy and gender equality: the impact of the fiscal system on women and men","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Налоги и налогообложение","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiscal policy; Gender equality; Economics; Tax policy; Political science; Demographic economics; Public economics; Macroeconomics; Tax reform; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.030045018884543646,"score_gpt":0.33760206070280496,"score_spread":0.3075570418182613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407085247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.526212,0.029640608,0.0011369755,0.046700455,0.00097087247,0.00004358183,0.0001571915,0.000009419804,0.39512888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98143137,0.004963577,0.00012320485,0.0014661235,0.00013738692,0.000018191635,0.000021561238,0.0000057806255,0.011832823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974899,0.0013631904,0.00004282326,0.00013996045,0.0003213911,0.0006427129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975775,0.0013608484,0.00040418608,0.00004403102,0.00024035892,0.00037307592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018835373,0.00028571484,0.00032723753,0.0011451712,0.003440361,0.003425239,0.00048024298,0.0007313629,0.010745214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004677336,0.00010874573,0.00037828487,0.0013895908,0.0037611413,0.0030139077,0.0026641288,0.00096524257,0.0005514165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040340368,0.00044467713,0.12465855,0.00041508337,0.000100806894,0.0012892032,0.06587866,0.00053201424,0.00040550277,0.61212724,0.014313286,0.17943163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007593267,0.00072518684,0.33243856,0.00225182,0.00017377085,0.0014281205,0.2700715,0.00069019984,0.0013279386,0.11257005,0.27816534,0.00008150397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008223574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011970784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010745214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034477846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022791754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03594637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407101903","doi":"10.1215/00703370-11790542","title":"Nonresident Parent Wealth Among Children","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Demographic economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Educational attainment; Payment; Inequality; Bachelor; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Economics; Household income; Psychology; Demography; Geography; Sociology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.010819597548556275,"score_gpt":0.28313181799226883,"score_spread":0.27231222044371256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407101903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973017,0.00025398657,0.00006355784,0.000066160515,0.0000019514316,0.0000030684496,0.0008742063,0.0000017983812,0.0014335355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985771,0.00025991406,0.0000823971,0.0000139233125,0.000003705209,0.0000057608495,0.0005963147,0.0000011394116,0.00045968016],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997975,0.000049086244,0.000013964267,0.000040688843,0.000041309384,0.000057423767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865997,0.00034067302,0.00068636914,0.00009169628,0.00006726896,0.00015403656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053795916,0.00013495325,0.00017354447,0.00073917623,0.00042168685,0.0003839023,0.00019959948,0.00017544537,0.0027534072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027733739,0.00012646131,0.00019817286,0.0009046126,0.00026392515,0.00062311476,0.0007225368,0.000337001,0.00021214249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007693341,0.0000057266734,0.99582857,0.0000053178933,0.000008982409,0.000042241772,0.00043951586,0.000032772423,0.000034385645,0.00016802833,0.00014398634,0.00328276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.1583167e-7,0.000006340322,0.99922526,0.0000056593162,0.0000030971246,0.00006442223,0.00027452013,0.000022241251,0.000025288833,0.00005714121,0.00031433514,0.0000013574046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012876087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042641565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012876087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031737806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002489276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025602281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407233433","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-75960-4_55","title":"Women’s Participation in Household Money Management and Financial Decision Making: Insights from a Developing Country","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Contributions to finance and accounting","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Finance; Economics","score_opus":0.019172029530585426,"score_gpt":0.2818351016174344,"score_spread":0.26266307208684897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407233433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92464423,0.002242071,0.00020051493,0.003681045,0.000023025606,0.00001015162,0.00009827852,0.000002194818,0.06909852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874642,0.001704482,0.00012744813,0.0002494971,0.000012347779,0.000012151987,0.000036475278,0.0000026436014,0.010390742],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995808,0.00022544293,0.0000055491932,0.000024536737,0.000024496196,0.0001390224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945086,0.00038316002,0.000061128005,0.0000119884735,0.000026486596,0.00006640769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008752287,0.00020837484,0.00017148093,0.0005092366,0.0034876012,0.0032607785,0.00048030796,0.0005607933,0.0053378306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010573011,0.00014087436,0.00012543939,0.0016789736,0.0028940043,0.0017701439,0.0016311232,0.0009675776,0.00020693387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017106469,0.00025150232,0.08154473,0.00013906055,0.000021937414,0.0013289222,0.7685575,0.00034288474,0.00063106284,0.0927332,0.0064754914,0.047802746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011365577,0.00007246083,0.092347294,0.00018601755,0.00001782431,0.000278817,0.8450085,0.00017151701,0.00022023576,0.008046806,0.053627033,0.000012167986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028086403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0674913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028086403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018046491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017766926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055845797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407241699","doi":"10.15517/rce.v43i1.56476","title":"Brechas salariales de género en Costa Rica","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Ciencias Económicas","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Unemployment; Estimation; Wage; Productivity; Quantile regression; Quarter (Canadian coin); Econometric model; Econometric analysis; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Econometrics; Geography; Economic growth","score_opus":0.020972834750868818,"score_gpt":0.3056617976603617,"score_spread":0.2846889629094929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407241699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9304853,0.009469832,0.0011161686,0.002464909,0.000068174755,0.00008707435,0.007878038,0.00015632123,0.04827413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839833,0.0049867597,0.0010219056,0.00014607905,0.00007108843,0.00006533995,0.0018374504,0.000018861312,0.007869268],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996283,0.00015521231,0.000016254426,0.00004353807,0.00005962691,0.00009708531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928766,0.00018837494,0.00023849163,0.00011446774,0.00012337869,0.00004761715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011792594,0.0002408405,0.00032485987,0.0009569046,0.0005391226,0.00097265694,0.00034901328,0.0002521562,0.004085805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026896438,0.00009914725,0.00026469197,0.0019567534,0.00035749254,0.00030957223,0.00081828906,0.00035927055,0.0004129518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002722383,0.00020037999,0.65844125,0.00052009296,0.0001814782,0.00074756565,0.007477977,0.0044825496,0.0007856072,0.03246047,0.017707609,0.2767228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024236104,0.000060408078,0.8889108,0.00036872824,0.00007185002,0.00033860168,0.005995199,0.0040794206,0.00030946918,0.0020483332,0.09777134,0.000021778062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13013642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111772135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13013642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002105606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001079011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2587579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407762898","doi":"10.1111/caje.70001","title":"Impact of income position information on perceived tax burden and preference for redistribution: An online survey","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Preference; Position (finance); Public economics; Business; Economics; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.13752665156027694,"score_gpt":0.2549843130345451,"score_spread":0.11745766147426817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407762898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991478,0.000013452919,0.0000447887,0.00004638144,0.0000029308521,0.000021467506,0.00013304959,0.0000018940877,0.00058822427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990583,0.000035667996,0.00017481754,0.000042032625,0.0000044662647,0.00004291825,0.00014622607,0.000001214065,0.0004942403],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985216,0.0007912594,0.00012257916,0.00011618254,0.0003082287,0.00014011403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885683,0.006349409,0.0028488769,0.0004730429,0.0008763095,0.0008840631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002733048,0.0001823873,0.0002886172,0.00068055827,0.0003914372,0.0008336159,0.00019763866,0.00044893418,0.005505237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010561845,0.00017553306,0.00039243963,0.0005381469,0.00031212353,0.0006269953,0.00041985678,0.0007577145,0.00065702654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055968686,0.002824904,0.97584015,0.000079393205,0.00009259028,0.00009856456,0.003491123,0.0002884939,0.0006387687,0.00016325078,0.0007451594,0.015177798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041197392,0.00075528485,0.99198806,0.000029449187,0.000039746454,0.00006312491,0.004718224,0.0010330813,0.000356879,0.00007208322,0.0008801858,0.000022762059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030558913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033357926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005505237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004073424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031371485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018416822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408207183","doi":"10.1086/735618","title":"What Makes a Decision Fair? Relative Earnings, Gender, and Justifications for Couples’ Decision-Making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Accounting","score_opus":0.025571197166315826,"score_gpt":0.3595851915168749,"score_spread":0.33401399435055906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408207183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9526637,0.00060575915,0.008177691,0.0051784483,0.00008187838,0.000045718625,0.000034402317,0.0000123168,0.03320005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910563,0.000060186772,0.0005361151,0.00007072189,0.000011038083,0.0000052993287,0.0000064084343,0.0000023762484,0.00020205806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858484,0.01094619,0.0005134325,0.00044633832,0.0014754077,0.0007702292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9560488,0.031218605,0.0069280737,0.001778982,0.002151048,0.0018744883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019415861,0.0002898788,0.00031202388,0.0010172664,0.002733269,0.0041445526,0.00046395443,0.0012883132,0.0035337582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067960694,0.00021933601,0.0003651546,0.00061741367,0.005241414,0.0027281786,0.0017745356,0.0016075494,0.00023912557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011355624,0.00085808436,0.42888477,0.0003257362,0.0003921376,0.0015404823,0.13602565,0.0047373963,0.0029501745,0.24630466,0.002766712,0.1740786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022886683,0.00065310264,0.28980476,0.00070501625,0.0002497978,0.0011569143,0.15907031,0.022882672,0.0030585455,0.49748045,0.024451068,0.000258478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036521761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044240914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019415861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016614649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018754178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10268211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408233165","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-32257-0_134-1","title":"Energizing Harmony","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.035593567056268885,"score_gpt":0.2756071575278713,"score_spread":0.24001359047160242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408233165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005635789,0.0030824482,0.006560405,0.0072595836,0.00079118006,0.000045267283,0.000033367374,0.00008667723,0.9765053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39751908,0.0051702703,0.009382673,0.007850923,0.00083560037,0.00025476838,0.00012537371,0.00036034168,0.5785009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991059,0.00038504577,0.000015509811,0.00014773966,0.00019723913,0.00014863096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969137,0.00010265074,0.000027411163,0.00006875352,0.000048451475,0.000061281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010705731,0.00058648584,0.00032463728,0.0009065468,0.0033921716,0.0066001434,0.00087778305,0.0019299678,0.024201658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019138405,0.00023254642,0.0002919537,0.00070782617,0.013541974,0.0062084813,0.005978981,0.003274327,0.004864524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019508638,0.000025345202,0.00015227424,0.0000576746,0.0000072396997,0.000058649475,0.007821471,0.00012969549,0.00043209488,0.94302416,0.022360878,0.02591108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012860722,0.000034360437,0.00055826164,0.00021339623,0.0000071192917,0.00015446286,0.007887003,0.00014508837,0.00054162164,0.4013671,0.58906776,0.000010921229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010919226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020386928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024201658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014872142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016663324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0809626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408766951","doi":"10.1111/dpr.70005","title":"Furthering a feminist fiscal agenda: Engendering tax and development","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Development Policy Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid; Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.054517656924277846,"score_gpt":0.3443310008822954,"score_spread":0.28981334395801756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408766951","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015495249,0.10688384,0.012806838,0.6692724,0.0049434584,0.00009359678,0.0002464804,0.00006787591,0.19019015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70548683,0.14359528,0.013106467,0.10136593,0.004127781,0.00026692747,0.0001691697,0.00012795393,0.031753786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986858,0.010249374,0.00024900885,0.0004902714,0.0013298856,0.0008234732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9718274,0.021268463,0.001736344,0.0011059558,0.0028722363,0.0011895233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024072232,0.0005081715,0.0005563423,0.0029460452,0.004369832,0.010866751,0.0011833193,0.0040430687,0.010911375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021288544,0.0003026489,0.0006535109,0.002705357,0.020014904,0.01570057,0.008420081,0.0060501737,0.0010012224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021743203,0.000028555402,0.0010548584,0.00084142527,0.000013415811,0.00011753201,0.008601384,0.00035395287,0.000089860885,0.9105274,0.026652312,0.051697526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010231123,0.000026566508,0.0010357745,0.0057501034,0.000016932128,0.00011791835,0.012108495,0.00018903113,0.00035890433,0.20006189,0.7803055,0.000018741155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008978726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014901329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024072232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012561008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01678349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12730765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408912701","doi":"10.1101/2025.03.25.25324432","title":"The health beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of males toward pregnancy planning and preconception health and care: a systematic review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pregnancy; Psychology; Health care; Medicine; Environmental health; Political science","score_opus":0.05673300811604659,"score_gpt":0.36439987576398825,"score_spread":0.30766686764794166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408912701","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025040829,0.9959396,0.0001448887,0.00024131576,0.00006269449,0.0003579463,0.00042361327,0.0000056084054,0.00032017383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028530702,0.9691766,0.00063187,0.000357934,0.000052504292,0.00092453975,0.00020944254,0.0000033131719,0.00011308667],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.991527,0.0030498141,0.0028172822,0.0006254027,0.0016798609,0.000300692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9566615,0.033526223,0.0059387824,0.00046769733,0.0030036643,0.0004021496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00952424,0.0011195606,0.006089964,0.0084411,0.000760037,0.0027108612,0.0016137372,0.0018470427,0.003447211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047893807,0.0010995766,0.005375331,0.009584688,0.000967214,0.0023793718,0.0014715287,0.0011323198,0.00025361974],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011982744,0.000022224756,0.0019391202,0.94972485,0.0044878977,0.00007671282,0.0007069708,0.000053839,0.00006439876,0.00020682637,0.0009257027,0.041671522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008829099,0.00013491571,0.007603592,0.9577191,0.025023647,0.0002547274,0.0008100549,0.00005800079,0.000091799426,0.00017741996,0.008008905,0.000029558492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014944025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03531831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014944025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039460664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01624079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05036962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408915325","doi":"10.1080/1081602x.2025.2469573","title":"Inequalities in North American fertility since 1921","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The History of the Family","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Fertility; Sociology; Demography; History; Geography; Political science; Mathematics; Population","score_opus":0.03460643503993667,"score_gpt":0.26730681663059536,"score_spread":0.2327003815906587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408915325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96264356,0.008045596,0.00018033409,0.0044503137,0.000079248035,0.000010493469,0.0033238924,0.00001254191,0.021253914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945227,0.002979753,0.000094944524,0.00019759646,0.0000624106,0.0000057940456,0.00082100707,0.0000037571563,0.0013121108],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953127,0.00008084466,0.000016383603,0.000098362565,0.00009314068,0.00017997943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998987,0.00012313532,0.00022394313,0.000045799537,0.00040466126,0.00021548173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082430575,0.000084089006,0.0002045272,0.0015157256,0.0019472167,0.0007173667,0.0003307428,0.00020261742,0.0025578653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002227671,0.000082502826,0.00013793279,0.00327395,0.0010513644,0.00041142135,0.00082394335,0.0006425425,0.00013226288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104048864,0.000040123632,0.8550662,0.0001607134,0.000096283366,0.00031152074,0.025115712,0.0007227322,0.00029822259,0.014674979,0.010921656,0.09248776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012030962,0.0000069739685,0.9805772,0.00004851769,0.000008835854,0.000062908526,0.0024970672,0.000070140864,0.000044398905,0.00023851928,0.016436474,0.0000077897275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7884153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89246017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7884153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060196915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038206198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42566144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409556700","doi":"10.1080/13533312.2025.2490670","title":"Where are the Fathers? Reincorporation, Family Relations and Gendered Parenthood in Colombia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Peacekeeping","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; VINNOVA; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Demographic economics; Criminology; Economics","score_opus":0.025562574556085658,"score_gpt":0.2957450104948616,"score_spread":0.27018243593877594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409556700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94716024,0.017876074,0.00040751632,0.004434308,0.0001183651,0.000016102034,0.00007571638,0.000011665626,0.029900044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947113,0.0030010801,0.00008673873,0.000105897256,0.000007902981,0.000004171344,0.0000128964475,0.0000027554024,0.002067313],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995722,0.00021477087,0.0000096422855,0.000045766054,0.000029491184,0.00012820642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997321,0.00011094216,0.000062116924,0.00000972361,0.000023315317,0.00006173989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057186594,0.00021516718,0.00019641324,0.0004192087,0.0031957685,0.0019638995,0.00031662884,0.00041751054,0.0031050325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080628414,0.000121533536,0.00007559602,0.00037959745,0.0019210487,0.001122121,0.0013454894,0.0005827392,0.00012613254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013337766,0.00012257411,0.09240317,0.00048348244,0.000017124128,0.004542047,0.7489292,0.00017078602,0.0017470717,0.037175268,0.007513227,0.10676266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007678903,0.00007055566,0.094962105,0.00063367665,0.000014208561,0.0013146362,0.7859652,0.00012462575,0.00040477136,0.0015635097,0.11491118,0.000027852271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076856144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16450967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076856144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002757022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013109522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15281755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409676921","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/n95gm_v1","title":"American Exceptionalism Revisited: Tax Relief, Poverty Reduction, and the Politics of Child Tax Credits","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Exceptionalism; Tax credit; Politics; Poverty reduction; American exceptionalism; Economics; Direct tax; Political science; Tax reform; Indirect tax; Poverty; Public economics; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0135560690862212,"score_gpt":0.2730601113395709,"score_spread":0.2595040422533497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409676921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31692368,0.013382235,0.0019280664,0.31248719,0.0009656333,0.000009359832,0.00006732238,0.00003564454,0.35420087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782431,0.0018942279,0.00021286655,0.0145607935,0.00028669988,0.00000681579,0.00001053715,0.000012820341,0.0047720037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977112,0.0010329637,0.000033323307,0.00023019958,0.00034964064,0.00064269395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829453,0.0007698174,0.0002078847,0.00009539628,0.0002199554,0.0004124406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027993412,0.00016800464,0.0002446901,0.0009070522,0.014264934,0.0058089504,0.00064738345,0.0033024757,0.002202697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027007202,0.00015395091,0.00027041702,0.0013001325,0.026630646,0.0034184763,0.0039670905,0.0071393307,0.00010958818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011901164,0.000017274364,0.0015930737,0.00001278584,0.0000041573285,0.00012851432,0.015192852,0.00009818883,0.00006425388,0.9689214,0.007251136,0.0067043924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002456066,0.000025970785,0.013885377,0.00032606148,0.000021745598,0.0002889888,0.048852306,0.00058983214,0.00036439975,0.52664506,0.4089164,0.000059273698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09776816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13310109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09776816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013588444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008669635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19439816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410112073","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5207456","title":"The Myth of the Traditional Gender Gap? Evidence from a Crucial Case","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Gender gap; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Art; Literature; Economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.04110410321921161,"score_gpt":0.2964469526265565,"score_spread":0.2553428494073449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410112073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61868167,0.015993303,0.003002364,0.21050297,0.0006331052,0.000054224012,0.00029576552,0.000008573564,0.15082796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99260324,0.0018303843,0.00023395784,0.0040065628,0.00015331378,0.000026392898,0.000025131758,0.0000067779015,0.0011141888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957278,0.0022562281,0.00017134222,0.0006339811,0.0005697711,0.00064103166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95686734,0.036530655,0.0029909816,0.0017243405,0.0010200243,0.0008667288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014474641,0.00029857355,0.0005772912,0.0017426535,0.0045528016,0.0033184132,0.0020489555,0.0042937556,0.0154669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031797554,0.00027205472,0.00024730337,0.0018563634,0.023306243,0.011084991,0.0045520905,0.003978854,0.0006122882],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003307564,0.0001721866,0.025891144,0.00035295202,0.000047255453,0.003151247,0.088545024,0.00013014865,0.00028709878,0.8350321,0.009326904,0.03673313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017248931,0.00013549718,0.04448422,0.0033471123,0.00014061904,0.00437079,0.3613729,0.0005351111,0.0008225741,0.49156177,0.09299395,0.00006306879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067034606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010380385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0154669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002126543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027419326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076550126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410367080","doi":"10.5771/9781498572910","title":"Ethnicity, Gender, and Diversity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Lexington Books","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Ethnic group; Gender diversity; Sociology; Anthropology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.06348040501066263,"score_gpt":0.28272145063131876,"score_spread":0.21924104562065613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410367080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005880724,0.015284636,0.0001653609,0.0031696835,0.0005423837,0.000007679966,0.000088983754,0.000015031911,0.9748455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09725881,0.016183559,0.00028945706,0.0017829983,0.00053011975,0.00003978701,0.00013557383,0.00005188106,0.8837277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977976,0.00006937811,0.000004640226,0.000024898256,0.00008912566,0.00003222387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998535,0.000049414262,0.000010764003,0.000009468438,0.000030250756,0.000046582183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028627788,0.0002914712,0.00026549114,0.0006442659,0.0023973556,0.0035900034,0.00026350323,0.00041833086,0.022927897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006800684,0.00014495234,0.00014796172,0.00095840596,0.0019080698,0.0019693766,0.0012005989,0.0007637889,0.003668727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042113646,0.000055174925,0.0041057793,0.00012029713,0.000008526193,0.00035550527,0.022695536,0.000114368406,0.00033194837,0.52155304,0.2817898,0.168828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029176267,0.000016592783,0.0049423934,0.0002605985,0.000005196755,0.00026304772,0.007874589,0.000066279856,0.000089034205,0.033912335,0.9525606,0.0000062198255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008789115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02141695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022927897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013160099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009214007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07670152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410431863","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-91371-6_14","title":"How Could a Gender Transformative Lens Foster the Integration of Sex/Gender into More Equitable Policy and Practice?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"B.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre; British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's Health","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Lens (geology); Gender studies; Through-the-lens metering; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0713362072871685,"score_gpt":0.3425841573234846,"score_spread":0.2712479500363161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410431863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039448217,0.01417934,0.020206222,0.12701023,0.005045225,0.000077530975,0.000036334397,0.000101661906,0.8293987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3113175,0.025618192,0.029217057,0.059395537,0.0043674805,0.0004876918,0.000106398176,0.00048163027,0.5690085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959065,0.0025512944,0.00006293538,0.0003510863,0.0007760465,0.00035215516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979407,0.0012827682,0.000095107076,0.00017391234,0.0002876697,0.00021984117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067787347,0.00092002423,0.00054490333,0.0014423089,0.005899936,0.012483731,0.0015340442,0.0043163868,0.010011424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003938165,0.00029853111,0.00051444146,0.0012290751,0.040546045,0.01458007,0.005208854,0.009055517,0.002583508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020836828,0.000006081495,0.000024269926,0.000024512867,7.6506e-7,0.000022840486,0.0052818786,0.00004754522,0.000033409073,0.98109573,0.0072364323,0.0062244316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043247874,0.000011858085,0.00008623548,0.00028869696,0.000002638697,0.00008564611,0.010266386,0.00017249046,0.00014804334,0.48839843,0.500527,0.000008152928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00628136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011786021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012483731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0102200555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010900702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07415199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410561023","doi":"10.1215/00703370-11958785","title":"The Effects of Extended Parental Benefits on Parents’ Employment and Earnings in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Parental leave; Demographic economics; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Economics; Labour economics","score_opus":0.005724822368554965,"score_gpt":0.23305428566595504,"score_spread":0.2273294632974001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410561023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930629,0.0010894533,0.0000677697,0.0012340299,0.000017643464,0.000012534783,0.0015447809,0.000008266179,0.0029625727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972759,0.00047791755,0.000082058694,0.000077676355,0.000003729375,0.0000060405014,0.0004507927,0.0000025462464,0.0016233244],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991677,0.00011932039,0.000027242822,0.00008973108,0.000186566,0.00040949555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971961,0.0004248521,0.00043359405,0.00009417987,0.0009291848,0.0009222101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095187477,0.00023163296,0.000313179,0.000804979,0.0027448197,0.0010504009,0.00095812976,0.0004286381,0.0025925892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033052173,0.0001577607,0.00054585567,0.0014982582,0.0007811777,0.0003485697,0.00086681027,0.0007958122,0.00011599597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023920111,0.00012682317,0.96949446,0.000023184022,0.00008617509,0.00020553221,0.002298191,0.00080430874,0.00021490676,0.0013542081,0.0026849043,0.022468159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010056971,0.00002774696,0.99603844,0.000028543831,0.0000233969,0.00002101427,0.0016102385,0.00048041125,0.000066775756,0.000074928656,0.0016071709,0.000011247088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0475841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0475841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0457787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34524846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410584843","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197801826.003.0011","title":"Gender and Public Policy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.042228698464002914,"score_gpt":0.29486079143718047,"score_spread":0.25263209297317757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410584843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050952733,0.038499065,0.0005759828,0.07677987,0.0025791782,0.000029531757,0.00011597433,0.000024198978,0.8763008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31857094,0.05804372,0.000863954,0.033289813,0.0023006434,0.00014403023,0.00017636339,0.00006564744,0.58654493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928313,0.00033081498,0.000014406693,0.000084564774,0.000115838615,0.00017135535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947745,0.00029712712,0.00003646567,0.000037359776,0.00007880544,0.000072922616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012184236,0.00043944523,0.00026140906,0.00083827454,0.0028378034,0.004694144,0.00051745836,0.0017831925,0.027872458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017706831,0.00015047097,0.00027121278,0.0011263888,0.004550438,0.003199521,0.0015615016,0.0025549692,0.0023999652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007504415,0.00001890612,0.00024384377,0.000095237316,0.0000028421139,0.000069296,0.0020593037,0.0001882987,0.000069846225,0.8868329,0.080934204,0.02947784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036458107,0.000010508936,0.0007249572,0.0006441185,0.0000040113905,0.00006309836,0.0037824414,0.00009469315,0.00010125779,0.08289128,0.9116737,0.000006307307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072106104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009279653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027872458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005297104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047840844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093242705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410869612","doi":"10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.106646","title":"Beverage Consumption Before and After the Implementation of Canada’s First Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Developments in Nutrition","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Canadian Cancer Society; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Center for African Studies; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Harvard University","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Sugar; Sugar consumption; Business; Economics; Agricultural economics; Public economics; Food science; Chemistry; Sociology","score_opus":0.01365741407881024,"score_gpt":0.29647995829694357,"score_spread":0.28282254421813335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410869612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786137,0.0007177604,0.00005885323,0.00256319,0.00012452282,0.000053704247,0.008720719,0.000012860841,0.009134687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96584606,0.0005235494,0.00012579896,0.0006681302,0.000046675596,0.000023708673,0.007968761,0.000011167168,0.02478619],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988372,0.000060238923,0.00003070401,0.00013748897,0.00035366454,0.00058076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695253,0.0002503204,0.00034967877,0.00008670912,0.0015134624,0.0008473092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074506167,0.0002566947,0.0005804296,0.0009443955,0.0028971997,0.0027286224,0.0010458904,0.001732529,0.006782961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029872283,0.00032577637,0.00074971607,0.002120871,0.0009932839,0.0009691612,0.0009472385,0.0026853932,0.0005590908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007215375,0.00201382,0.90486556,0.00018868603,0.0003466878,0.0004534231,0.007917662,0.0011849855,0.0015453149,0.0034923968,0.031732496,0.039043624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028531911,0.00007374877,0.98641056,0.000027056347,0.000038470374,0.000009672267,0.0042671165,0.0001554168,0.00027709082,0.000064920896,0.008627551,0.00001990593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99186873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03324708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03324708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03247318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2412256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411015226","doi":"10.3386/w33822","title":"Tax Credits and Child Outcomes: Lessons from the U.S., U.K., and Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tax credit; Political science; Economics; Business; Public economics","score_opus":0.21435324052801413,"score_gpt":0.4778943579701565,"score_spread":0.26354111744214237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411015226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39402652,0.3537021,0.00062205066,0.11067697,0.0010962839,0.0001583319,0.017261328,0.000045166908,0.12241127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74937403,0.23419154,0.0007010737,0.00582055,0.00029944183,0.000052643045,0.0032477935,0.000037041547,0.006275974],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834967,0.00023795849,0.00007373185,0.00013325227,0.000504963,0.0007004038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917874,0.0014249866,0.00080219656,0.00019506487,0.004376521,0.0014138339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020083839,0.0003964036,0.0006505588,0.0027060155,0.0029222227,0.0028983941,0.001201893,0.00075120863,0.004655857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008388612,0.0002088847,0.00076085987,0.009084325,0.002137183,0.0011788702,0.0018946797,0.0020214922,0.0002511887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003653629,0.0002109033,0.6692252,0.0010978577,0.00044148727,0.0007052383,0.008203479,0.0013614713,0.00010446465,0.036168214,0.076637104,0.20547922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005473315,0.00008846343,0.87831205,0.005045131,0.00052193896,0.00019848695,0.017134462,0.0004821136,0.00022430364,0.0056041745,0.09222408,0.000110159635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99506795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03841381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03841381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08686723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.278713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411452260","doi":"10.61959/bcgo5222f","title":"Le budget de la famille moderne : les familles des militaires et des vétérans au Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.032010844156723596,"score_gpt":0.2860783936065612,"score_spread":0.25406754944983756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411452260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8631741,0.011213133,0.00025668758,0.03927035,0.00018131411,0.000064792366,0.00516101,0.00002857635,0.0806501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96611494,0.0055619907,0.00026858004,0.000799166,0.000048851638,0.000025746245,0.0007756375,0.000013057196,0.026392005],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993237,0.000055258246,0.000012268553,0.00002664475,0.00021635098,0.0003657445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985139,0.00008224319,0.00015442705,0.000026521362,0.0005748598,0.0006482023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005488482,0.0001683226,0.0001679803,0.0016480915,0.0056072013,0.0019565094,0.0005482268,0.00031538878,0.008578978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022526134,0.00017626751,0.00013061987,0.0028421797,0.001386289,0.0006559476,0.0010657395,0.0008390365,0.00023184552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013796268,0.00010513087,0.6434262,0.0002221566,0.0000671697,0.00061471516,0.044792525,0.0009974986,0.0007756083,0.057663705,0.10201019,0.14918716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010135788,0.000030161253,0.77368426,0.00024357162,0.000017396698,0.0001520633,0.041916214,0.0003117361,0.00016213737,0.0011895846,0.18225524,0.000027616461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9938869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051781643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051781643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10492876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37570387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411529304","doi":"10.1007/s42650-025-00092-w","title":"Births to Mexican Women in the First Two Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Studies in Population","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Geography; Demography; Virology; Medicine; Sociology; Outbreak; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.060533245974025915,"score_gpt":0.36629419917218226,"score_spread":0.3057609531981563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411529304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867356,0.002271542,0.000027652715,0.0034124136,0.000098080316,0.000029556955,0.0012722075,0.000005424364,0.006147522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934378,0.003305059,0.00003643819,0.0006709513,0.000047678568,0.000026784153,0.00052851444,0.000004263431,0.001942464],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992206,0.00010603082,0.000020334108,0.000045359568,0.00008142716,0.00052610517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877495,0.000110467336,0.00040583606,0.000043147935,0.00018866042,0.00047679563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079588086,0.0001896731,0.00031398592,0.0009181699,0.0032776978,0.0016330011,0.00070802815,0.0011772033,0.0033331208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039029485,0.0002993057,0.00033224234,0.0019326021,0.0009054439,0.00072474533,0.0019262085,0.0022688739,0.00020928739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006005393,0.00022582326,0.92500746,0.00014797426,0.00008377451,0.0012407476,0.03823013,0.00013707014,0.0003688009,0.0022987493,0.009813335,0.021845652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001956721,0.00007186744,0.90760475,0.0001961619,0.00002502763,0.00033077723,0.08410838,0.00006654238,0.00007955653,0.00013579072,0.007334629,0.000026989617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.828716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9122756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17128402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007889065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009612661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34458548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411875984","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5331696","title":"Helping Those That Hide: Anticipated Stigmatization Drives Concealment and a Destructive Cycle of Debt","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.014425849650050185,"score_gpt":0.2996951768556109,"score_spread":0.28526932720556075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411875984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98725224,0.00007285409,0.00057265797,0.0017203046,0.0000123445525,0.000015428779,0.000011213537,0.0000043566497,0.010338724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991351,0.000025604637,0.00014892392,0.00010696992,0.0000039212055,0.000004591442,0.0000048108354,0.0000025350594,0.0005675382],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984981,0.000743426,0.000055019686,0.00010385339,0.0002604227,0.00033917616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985811,0.0058817645,0.0045857625,0.0011854231,0.0009325359,0.0016034568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026073647,0.0001589598,0.00019811542,0.00056177314,0.0028519686,0.004359726,0.0007226401,0.0017979223,0.0051685795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023610469,0.0003659605,0.00017670268,0.00034699697,0.0038275204,0.0026389607,0.002629467,0.0026697512,0.0003689442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009117113,0.0017716798,0.48776415,0.0001281236,0.00007866878,0.003055626,0.35527593,0.0006102022,0.0051728473,0.09445228,0.002804626,0.04797414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014185997,0.0004499513,0.35028404,0.00033400187,0.000109871035,0.003498953,0.5445874,0.005387382,0.002867106,0.07454104,0.017675428,0.00012296128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003881404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047980123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051685795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015021254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002391987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017290652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412072970","doi":"10.36510/learnland.vi29.1140","title":"The Messiness of Being Human: A Father-Daughter Performative Dialogue","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LEARNing Landscapes","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Daughter; Performative utterance; Sociology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.011337934553423891,"score_gpt":0.27835210201960514,"score_spread":0.26701416746618123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412072970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78988224,0.0037112087,0.011181878,0.08510538,0.0028514045,0.0001736827,0.00013681418,0.0001473163,0.106810115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97259843,0.0008967436,0.0020273663,0.0029787105,0.00027386617,0.000060517872,0.000022919752,0.00010994433,0.021031447],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98836446,0.009537204,0.00015338129,0.00056479126,0.0005490957,0.0008310667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912765,0.005600968,0.00047801327,0.00020116303,0.00044761525,0.0019957281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010587644,0.0010914776,0.00083572796,0.00095201307,0.02463511,0.008229717,0.0018359291,0.0043971436,0.0040748897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011231781,0.0007102591,0.00045071647,0.0004494007,0.01740954,0.006213455,0.010125685,0.008523085,0.0008352168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023889943,0.000022785185,0.00030541298,0.000023705636,0.000002516313,0.002870506,0.9866938,0.000024437126,0.00044933427,0.006683368,0.0016107769,0.0012894698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069595926,0.00005112156,0.00034146121,0.00009458706,0.000004343356,0.0022365125,0.93844384,0.00008658236,0.00045469086,0.001381605,0.05688149,0.000016915206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067533744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012643787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02463511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051615476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027665207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055993497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412310290","doi":"","title":"Female Labor Force Participation in the United States: Impact of Income Taxes During 1990-2000","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Agricultural economics","score_opus":0.02575887900010842,"score_gpt":0.3285643173340298,"score_spread":0.3028054383339214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412310290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99552697,0.00057159923,0.000021797881,0.00037030995,0.000019182939,0.0000044079416,0.0024244145,0.0000029238201,0.0010582078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99539185,0.0004139886,0.000014561103,0.000108793414,0.000015081201,0.000007918199,0.0022753638,0.0000022291197,0.0017703379],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964535,0.000066641674,0.000027859842,0.000043655356,0.000044891887,0.00017158478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991947,0.00007635568,0.00033510933,0.000021504147,0.00009846147,0.00027389982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049585296,0.00023857127,0.00027575536,0.0008120961,0.00052784756,0.0007162846,0.00046700297,0.00063449115,0.0027198778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012466195,0.00022407684,0.00043366893,0.001003383,0.0002260849,0.0005586005,0.00091364566,0.00079240394,0.00031786738],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026415105,0.00007362128,0.99512863,0.00001793543,0.000052065,0.000061571634,0.0003904242,0.0000787728,0.00009775398,0.000097274766,0.0011691774,0.0025685646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003200771,0.00002428686,0.9981573,0.000011689526,0.000012595903,0.00003770109,0.0008137981,0.000069780086,0.00003625689,0.000012851443,0.000818942,0.000001760383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14203899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29035398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14203899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009439699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074806466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2824245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412553905","doi":"10.3390/jrfm18080407","title":"Economic Attitudes and Financial Decisions Among Welfare Recipients: Considerations for Workforce Policy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Welfare; Economic welfare; Business; Public economics; Economics; Labour economics; Finance; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.01633690804493945,"score_gpt":0.29338905468352655,"score_spread":0.2770521466385871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412553905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951492,0.00017156058,0.00011548015,0.0033591567,0.000010551548,0.000011189181,0.000037766193,7.702576e-7,0.001144335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989241,0.00022558462,0.00011901699,0.00042542457,0.000017081002,0.000021386977,0.000026935279,5.844491e-7,0.00023998362],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921584,0.00046045874,0.000024091616,0.000036288726,0.000073560645,0.00018973231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982345,0.0006519929,0.00043321622,0.000046132427,0.00017823865,0.00045581252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022993805,0.00016746022,0.00018025559,0.0004690344,0.0011449427,0.0011575762,0.00034236882,0.00052720826,0.0032103427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059453314,0.00009855547,0.00019860112,0.00035384655,0.00048391387,0.0008520027,0.00078382966,0.0007306548,0.0002487345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014053406,0.0006800088,0.95251316,0.000052405678,0.00002826794,0.000135023,0.009443514,0.00014936052,0.000663397,0.0009183193,0.00093370985,0.034342326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008924145,0.0002896157,0.95829767,0.00012100448,0.00002083172,0.0000564751,0.03775706,0.00048492858,0.00015535388,0.00062150817,0.0021740776,0.000012716251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009269038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024971616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009269038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007459039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001496406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018430173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412633223","doi":"10.1037/apl0001310","title":"Disrupted selves in transition: How women navigate fertility treatments in the context of work.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Psychology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Psychology; Transition (genetics); Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Fertility; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.020825558423956628,"score_gpt":0.33176603939019655,"score_spread":0.31094048096623994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412633223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9631701,0.006223139,0.0018345345,0.012975029,0.000227688,0.000097537704,0.00016182123,0.000042623422,0.015267457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898656,0.0024823905,0.00077827176,0.0019702164,0.000027202017,0.000077543824,0.00007019303,0.00002481879,0.0047038],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997095,0.0020329494,0.00008256641,0.00015513274,0.0002409696,0.00039339738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608827,0.0025013702,0.0004802021,0.00012883625,0.00015909519,0.0006421884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042687813,0.00034278558,0.0004450177,0.00077594904,0.0067695263,0.005419441,0.001362664,0.0015909184,0.0037546447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011393161,0.00043550602,0.0003443143,0.0006995081,0.007366572,0.005010479,0.00606908,0.0030359193,0.0005091182],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040748582,0.00004275574,0.0087881405,0.00016398173,0.000010077578,0.0009151751,0.9670174,0.00003678022,0.0002977041,0.0022568367,0.00201931,0.018411051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037588236,0.00005122558,0.003896992,0.00013529054,0.0000057445395,0.0004334759,0.97519964,0.00004114878,0.00008761787,0.0008684252,0.019264346,0.000012404537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004636293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014388075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067695263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023183445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034552736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022575736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412654831","doi":"10.1215/00703370-12159081","title":"Whose Parents Matter? Intergenerational Transmission of Earnings Arrangements in Different-Sex Couples: A Research Note","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Demography","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Demographic economics; Demography; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.030175144536239158,"score_gpt":0.35080546576859517,"score_spread":0.320630321232356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412654831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927308,0.0027369175,0.00039541515,0.0016030197,0.000022594291,0.000005966264,0.00013391623,0.0000015100278,0.0023698576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979824,0.0014296396,0.0001194098,0.00011112367,0.00001498528,0.000004975147,0.00004134484,0.000001266335,0.00029492885],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987721,0.0008297789,0.000036973208,0.00017241668,0.000087119915,0.00010148622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99375856,0.0043348307,0.0010797366,0.00037560493,0.0002346997,0.0002165942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030372012,0.00010035067,0.00021805527,0.00078146544,0.0010515227,0.0011817163,0.00037056283,0.00042645374,0.0018629186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009005718,0.00020197782,0.00017308506,0.0016177385,0.001278727,0.0019067517,0.0008190816,0.00054575136,0.00013556227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058787176,0.00006711952,0.9169814,0.00003240696,0.00007265376,0.00039472472,0.039911315,0.000109296845,0.00012781119,0.008896409,0.0006784917,0.032669637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056299655,0.00006193928,0.9274039,0.00012063807,0.0000627957,0.0004204206,0.061752494,0.00044390024,0.00019187701,0.0056215134,0.0038959852,0.000018833553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017295726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018590743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017295726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006547665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004888966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034390092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412719515","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5366137","title":"The Hidden Tradeoffs in Promoting Impure Public Goods: Evidence from a Field Experiment with Farmers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Field (mathematics); Business; Environmental economics; Public economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02390106673781757,"score_gpt":0.3006105188651233,"score_spread":0.27670945212730574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412719515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887394,0.00020307006,0.001127427,0.00069477677,0.00000862482,0.00003577119,0.000024314862,0.000007938899,0.00915876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984238,0.00008020661,0.0004418602,0.0000937123,0.000005740459,0.000028169674,0.0000062052886,0.0000043829787,0.0009158836],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970577,0.001837014,0.00009774761,0.00036648207,0.00035723424,0.00028384055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9240248,0.063102014,0.0069706948,0.00405263,0.00051547936,0.0013342837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007865565,0.00040874368,0.00063087087,0.0005185619,0.0015332381,0.002409204,0.0007479781,0.0036765225,0.015552246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026078876,0.0006412782,0.0003376493,0.00045023725,0.0038074213,0.0031846007,0.0016815747,0.0017047249,0.0004974851],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06430618,0.046690796,0.31377453,0.0031347598,0.0012459287,0.003317569,0.03309145,0.017052079,0.15222801,0.14170118,0.0038030203,0.21965452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009696163,0.039831754,0.576005,0.0008017115,0.0016415137,0.0015197416,0.041868646,0.027210182,0.050278373,0.22214504,0.028527537,0.00047439535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017229846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026495985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015552246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009658391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083902007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052027464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412953115","doi":"10.56687/9781847421715-004","title":"One Introduction: the construction of teenage pregnancy as a social problem","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Policy Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pregnancy; Psychology; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.036220966735180216,"score_gpt":0.2813854896014405,"score_spread":0.24516452286626028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412953115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030392094,0.09557567,0.009091108,0.032201923,0.016838776,0.0001898823,0.00046873186,0.00026046074,0.8423343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031937204,0.15791841,0.01445189,0.020627525,0.012130819,0.00044391118,0.0010802186,0.00035737333,0.7610526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970055,0.00009447729,0.000014763761,0.000045023942,0.000114168055,0.000031040057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995357,0.00031601643,0.000019875131,0.000015104709,0.000066156106,0.00004714695],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037704923,0.00081326626,0.0005292247,0.0009786661,0.0018170876,0.0023878578,0.000669785,0.0020220801,0.020775324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009223142,0.00032587172,0.00037257606,0.0013342814,0.0020326367,0.0026803853,0.0013249348,0.0041940846,0.005739744],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017328177,0.00008117833,0.00035373596,0.00059233385,0.000005528255,0.00032142986,0.0066888644,0.00044144457,0.00027720522,0.39728144,0.5118629,0.08207662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025086563,0.0000254347,0.0004266461,0.00050397107,0.0000019538027,0.0003118871,0.0011482481,0.00010660914,0.00006612421,0.035369232,0.9620301,0.0000073841447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021772275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038559553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013709167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013060115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06950039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413113170","doi":"10.1007/s10508-025-03265-5","title":"Correction: Sexual and Gender Diversity in Thailand: Associations with Recalled Childhood Sex-Typed Behavior and Adulthood Occupational Preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; General Electric (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sexual behavior; Diversity (politics); Public health; Developmental psychology; Gender diversity; Sexual orientation; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.03653126918210954,"score_gpt":0.29612370366000895,"score_spread":0.2595924344778994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413113170","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041472484,0.0005681373,0.000455446,0.045384668,0.94426024,0.000046288053,0.00465549,0.00034400675,0.0038710632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052690577,0.0076441593,0.0065387264,0.088667475,0.28831506,0.00096541,0.009270257,0.0023907167,0.5435176],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970849,0.00049370056,0.0006669342,0.00037957972,0.0010491956,0.0003256662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973381,0.0051173414,0.0015735945,0.0021185533,0.016464218,0.0013453442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033846244,0.0023189047,0.0022074694,0.0033478262,0.0041423705,0.0030253213,0.004214629,0.00561208,0.07542642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07589456,0.0013422327,0.001097366,0.0037634484,0.0023585036,0.0026012522,0.0025465,0.009816553,0.037298366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027359209,0.0000038682747,0.0001718681,0.000098277495,0.000007491649,0.00030894481,0.000074731,0.000034354543,0.000013848612,0.0003616113,0.9961964,0.0027013016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101638994,0.000027595808,0.0039641387,0.0009817327,0.000065052125,0.0011805356,0.0006943245,0.0005221325,0.00041715964,0.0014810708,0.9904869,0.000077694094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07726117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06681412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07726117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041419715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007732552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25232655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413510589","doi":"10.64628/aam.ncnchhtsk","title":"Federal election 2021: Gender-based violence is an issue we should all prioritize","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Computer security; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05968942290983216,"score_gpt":0.33429925361647356,"score_spread":0.2746098307066414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413510589","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013166696,0.002767806,0.0004598666,0.9478896,0.01014094,0.000029926729,0.00013372484,0.00005777469,0.02535376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2790633,0.0054940265,0.0018835283,0.6499856,0.009137671,0.00010644111,0.00039933715,0.00013895943,0.053791054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918133,0.00209727,0.00029098513,0.0003389063,0.0016902441,0.0037693083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98241895,0.004947017,0.0016005399,0.00046389826,0.0037425254,0.006827039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007611796,0.00041251586,0.000779108,0.0010157945,0.012425119,0.00732987,0.001355636,0.013818927,0.020074852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025577296,0.0003062854,0.0007486955,0.00077444135,0.004026744,0.0041310717,0.0041910647,0.016851462,0.0026167252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013318883,0.00024543432,0.020072196,0.0003210292,0.00006935937,0.0007061363,0.0042787036,0.00020085364,0.0009429973,0.08602411,0.80080205,0.086203896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027877437,0.00011802524,0.04019933,0.0010311633,0.0000544796,0.00034011132,0.020495126,0.000256565,0.0008105141,0.031606235,0.90494233,0.00011821551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038223702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09743186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9617763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005343182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025144678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07600248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413607137","doi":"10.64628/aam.mndasrcfu","title":"The motherhood pay gap: Why women’s earnings decline after having children","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Gender pay gap; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economics; Psychology; Accounting; Wage","score_opus":0.012473462575856496,"score_gpt":0.27025449852336403,"score_spread":0.2577810359475075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413607137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9291346,0.004352494,0.00036298175,0.045916624,0.00024196591,0.0000135598275,0.0010708999,0.00001886161,0.018887956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960582,0.00062020804,0.00005481034,0.0006854348,0.000077621924,0.000009126915,0.00017784633,0.0000089151745,0.0023078648],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993954,0.00011739132,0.000020762298,0.00008181491,0.000078996934,0.00030572043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979697,0.0007940459,0.0004725656,0.000106420695,0.0001961156,0.000461201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011543465,0.00012686363,0.0002702214,0.0005763156,0.00093020004,0.0015824437,0.00049682095,0.0012483145,0.0116431685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073454506,0.00014608625,0.0002586776,0.00092716893,0.00092415616,0.0017606599,0.0010775113,0.0015769708,0.0008008158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076064805,0.00044470403,0.76983356,0.00019363541,0.00012974317,0.001294557,0.020392925,0.00056673866,0.0007410554,0.064324506,0.028476154,0.11284171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047182075,0.00011797875,0.91009533,0.00022744102,0.0000469011,0.0003672601,0.032984108,0.0005732385,0.00032995557,0.032608286,0.022577463,0.000024939056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015898123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016433889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015898123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081552257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013708371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038950264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413621265","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-32257-0_134-2","title":"Energizing Harmony","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.029607475537995687,"score_gpt":0.27260481981111345,"score_spread":0.24299734427311775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413621265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053781453,0.0029753048,0.0063236766,0.0069641494,0.00077662437,0.000043502296,0.000032570995,0.0000836658,0.97742236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38795292,0.005152473,0.009239761,0.0077118976,0.00082893315,0.00024490847,0.00012472745,0.00035412275,0.58839035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912757,0.0003747982,0.00001528755,0.00014405874,0.00019372377,0.00014471445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969125,0.000102157166,0.0000272206,0.00006893209,0.00004882533,0.00006160763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010577191,0.0005846,0.00032313075,0.0009043442,0.003398697,0.006617038,0.00087566883,0.001903011,0.02461039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018942858,0.00023024422,0.0002907618,0.000707247,0.013368457,0.006172902,0.005959201,0.0032551915,0.0049439683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018623117,0.00002485415,0.00014607036,0.00005603875,0.000006961453,0.00005716244,0.007593386,0.00012586963,0.0004173537,0.94371945,0.022327213,0.025507074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012276789,0.00003272187,0.0005383283,0.0002113902,0.0000068532404,0.000152027,0.0076890863,0.00014355326,0.0005275389,0.39854753,0.592128,0.000010705389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001099882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020643598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02461039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014974367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016489171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08232999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413725372","doi":"10.64628/aam.rrtwaqse7","title":"Higher prices, reduced hours: Restaurants &amp; minimum wage hikes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Minimum wage; Economics; Agricultural economics; Wage; Business; Labour economics; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.05552829986982182,"score_gpt":0.32708161748772346,"score_spread":0.27155331761790164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413725372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834479,0.00046403176,0.00030766625,0.0030361894,0.00004020027,0.00001023972,0.00056462886,0.000013557846,0.012115675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975624,0.000120193174,0.00010383348,0.00010141135,0.000037187267,0.0000048738534,0.00007422916,0.0000061065734,0.0019897886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996222,0.000097341515,0.000017489043,0.00007392052,0.00004611222,0.00014290577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960367,0.00091791525,0.0016490094,0.000120996054,0.00016676051,0.0011087159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005079468,0.00017559616,0.00026495405,0.0005079429,0.0010202281,0.0018314335,0.00050031464,0.0014043968,0.028454553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047180355,0.0002871956,0.00025909673,0.00080936635,0.0009307501,0.0010805489,0.000884753,0.0010282961,0.0008235258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015964998,0.0009770513,0.9346205,0.00027400133,0.00019603966,0.00075398677,0.0070699276,0.0006658261,0.001968491,0.014644662,0.008978964,0.028253926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026136851,0.00009705075,0.9790789,0.00003737674,0.000049574912,0.00013084887,0.012408719,0.00033351622,0.0001492706,0.0045971656,0.0030762835,0.00001516504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015511759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025407942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028454553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005944584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007292145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09518993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413879684","doi":"10.1001/amajethics.2025.642","title":"How Should Clinicians Follow Up About Nonresponses to Mandatory SDoH Screening Questions?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The AMA Journal of Ethic","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Medicine; Family medicine; Psychology","score_opus":0.09257522559946697,"score_gpt":0.39337778509780935,"score_spread":0.3008025594983424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413879684","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016794067,0.0040683644,0.0019054933,0.97974455,0.0074441712,0.00016606486,0.00008004764,0.00016487532,0.0047470466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07054215,0.029297823,0.019248556,0.8486153,0.022904145,0.0019749745,0.00033991414,0.00028583515,0.0067914175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93973273,0.039300222,0.009711754,0.0022507706,0.0061358665,0.002868675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67769957,0.19058093,0.025615826,0.007681406,0.08081594,0.017606365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06311931,0.00059622165,0.0014592139,0.0033001034,0.006319827,0.006942197,0.0038822226,0.022334311,0.009783889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40343696,0.0011573524,0.0012941713,0.0019612396,0.0053967806,0.017613826,0.004523025,0.018657302,0.008011009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010286605,0.0001591714,0.009694566,0.0010497441,0.000036517325,0.0019708492,0.01038736,0.00015166326,0.00026183703,0.0036575815,0.8308942,0.14163353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039530484,0.00028845287,0.022836462,0.02526732,0.00015079475,0.0077406494,0.08785558,0.0016109835,0.0012952081,0.050639544,0.8013533,0.00056635577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023296699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03932028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06311931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005854216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018685346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3338108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413906628","doi":"10.70121/001c.143862","title":"For Better or For Worse? The Dual Economic Impact of the Industrial Revolution on Women","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly review .","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Doug Bragg Enterprises (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Industrial Revolution; Economics; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.06284970195541344,"score_gpt":0.358034971182601,"score_spread":0.2951852692271876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413906628","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010632119,0.9203524,0.00007090449,0.038844835,0.0010848966,0.000002740444,0.000018998518,0.0000026121381,0.02899058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10603927,0.8803271,0.00006665443,0.006398932,0.0023743317,0.000008435376,0.000011852461,0.0000054040383,0.0047680405],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991297,0.0005245609,0.000017315966,0.00005855436,0.00012909822,0.00014077789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944216,0.00032062398,0.00007168738,0.000020770123,0.00009078828,0.00005395273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012336106,0.00018908028,0.000357984,0.0010014061,0.0014726748,0.002592127,0.00039588887,0.0013538251,0.0031476978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016964831,0.00009160723,0.00019801893,0.0016033204,0.005706946,0.0022574489,0.0011510963,0.0009788675,0.00054864446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010918364,0.00006234584,0.0044815135,0.0030945218,0.000056013232,0.0006616032,0.040562503,0.00013436556,0.0004802516,0.25039986,0.06787593,0.6320819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011980033,0.000075956974,0.011119007,0.0057532955,0.000036657675,0.00053480215,0.045064546,0.00002107942,0.0001510118,0.021799402,0.91541445,0.000017714985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010840618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014096997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010840618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020560042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026347034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021555066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413962384","doi":"10.54254/2753-7048/2025.nd26533","title":"Redesign of the Trivers-Willard Hypothesis Measurement Tool","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering","score_opus":0.04405721547835222,"score_gpt":0.3193881874069175,"score_spread":0.27533097192856526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413962384","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16209462,0.0016430771,0.73555785,0.008133628,0.004021388,0.030921524,0.00715974,0.0018675046,0.04860064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26395974,0.0009934545,0.6323994,0.002476176,0.0005743897,0.09043738,0.0031125424,0.00046170413,0.005585182],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9340107,0.040130753,0.008628026,0.00493966,0.010937104,0.0013536933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81267494,0.12073619,0.009616249,0.015697408,0.039339468,0.0019357599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.074481174,0.0011390629,0.0018177753,0.0059537156,0.0018170306,0.004668764,0.0038900154,0.0018085135,0.011857885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16062011,0.0010037797,0.0025930838,0.004351727,0.0030446185,0.0058224984,0.0054491404,0.0036530783,0.002888911],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007761226,0.0013212342,0.16012749,0.0031849518,0.00063330005,0.00047510164,0.023280323,0.0026145976,0.004067418,0.14568746,0.03727444,0.62055755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008953806,0.0031945365,0.28788397,0.0054438123,0.001024762,0.0010415332,0.02660604,0.040797837,0.015586406,0.26387975,0.3527019,0.0009439903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001903445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002344826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074481174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031437622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066570933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3938988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414082831","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2504747122","title":"Interventions to bolster benefits take-up: Assessing intensity, framing, and targeting of government outreach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association for Co-operative Education","funders":"Department of Social Services, Australian Government; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Outreach; Psychological intervention; Government (linguistics); Poverty; Compliance (psychology); Safety net; Test (biology)","score_opus":0.05686227878589329,"score_gpt":0.3561117007627253,"score_spread":0.299249421976832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414082831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99030054,0.00021079634,0.0013208658,0.00041397277,0.000030653857,0.0013354401,0.00034034826,0.000073909236,0.0059733265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888946,0.00019213889,0.0059124557,0.00035259494,0.00003104992,0.0029173112,0.00020802466,0.0000064227283,0.0014855245],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996732,0.001886005,0.00011003771,0.0005272922,0.0004577912,0.0002868692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953974,0.0020921833,0.001310751,0.0003660879,0.0002400144,0.000593594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035383804,0.00067966053,0.00040680726,0.0005413363,0.0008598087,0.00069964083,0.00084150373,0.0006587367,0.0065617063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008560682,0.00031297607,0.0005959728,0.00032552675,0.0006151742,0.0008749069,0.0012059234,0.0009976499,0.00058905105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008519645,0.07032083,0.2303618,0.0026436134,0.0013029916,0.00008630826,0.008703897,0.005118023,0.0055154623,0.0022921448,0.006307283,0.658828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058296253,0.08838519,0.8601525,0.0011636479,0.0024656213,0.00009366786,0.0053260745,0.011646565,0.0071694544,0.0033972913,0.014221538,0.0001489124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010022125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017629633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010022125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015385345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001959894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02195108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414192265","doi":"10.1017/9781839704710.006","title":"The Same-Sex Marriage Debates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Scholarship; Government (linguistics); Family law; International law; Common law","score_opus":0.016879034467716113,"score_gpt":0.2835647353811739,"score_spread":0.2666857009134578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414192265","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036485013,0.08145981,0.00040984267,0.5177628,0.005201911,0.00001910564,0.000070582595,0.000015240045,0.35857573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.698006,0.030514564,0.00030648385,0.15926015,0.0045513506,0.00004998404,0.00007237576,0.00008099875,0.10715815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894303,0.0053302785,0.00017368732,0.0010087977,0.0018788346,0.002177986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99488777,0.0023180577,0.0002558234,0.0002029671,0.00054225,0.0017931808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007879755,0.00033663347,0.0005377529,0.0014304726,0.030423053,0.011635395,0.001679889,0.0100402525,0.018832508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103219645,0.00031432556,0.0005140106,0.002336813,0.033332247,0.007980946,0.007693823,0.012219298,0.0016782609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020759773,0.000051323237,0.0007156339,0.000079255195,0.0000067168367,0.00065841264,0.066745274,0.000043493794,0.00008460675,0.7976013,0.11374319,0.020249935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018188164,0.00001730656,0.002073683,0.0005451724,0.000005429431,0.00036919658,0.06966816,0.000083391526,0.00008374602,0.068615675,0.85849833,0.000021746222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07855491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09078552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07855491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019459814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0100247655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1561954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414291932","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2025.10013","title":"Behavioural insights policies in Canada: support for nudges vs nudging","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioural Public Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nudge theory; Public opinion; Public policy; Subject (documents); Behavioral economics; Motivated reasoning; Optimism","score_opus":0.04785665213834419,"score_gpt":0.31757013678193147,"score_spread":0.2697134846435873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414291932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96791303,0.000346346,0.00044631632,0.0068952246,0.000042837968,0.000080905236,0.0007500208,0.000014343708,0.02351109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725914,0.00019350261,0.00020296835,0.0005759016,0.0000062111567,0.000031249816,0.00015317377,0.000004401426,0.0015734629],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946091,0.0013586573,0.0001739665,0.00037950953,0.0019177551,0.0015610557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776969,0.0073891343,0.0030474048,0.0006988236,0.0072042244,0.0039634937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076765353,0.00019348972,0.00032238362,0.0017784204,0.0073019415,0.0034418278,0.0010022846,0.00091881974,0.004234904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025451206,0.00017895133,0.0003030092,0.0028298937,0.0042647216,0.00095356215,0.002038425,0.0017070749,0.00016955734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027868245,0.00019474838,0.6967325,0.00033208414,0.000081370235,0.00034841287,0.21620733,0.0005523859,0.0011602488,0.014436283,0.015956761,0.053719256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014331908,0.000058733975,0.7375722,0.00034319606,0.000023607989,0.000035567402,0.22965479,0.000619725,0.00039377244,0.0013072194,0.029886287,0.00009052974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9810199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98630327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.947963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052036993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06773596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37755656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414592679","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/gvkej_v1","title":"The Role of Environmental Contexts on Impacts of Gender Minority Stress","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Psychological Association","funders":"","keywords":"Stressor; Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Multilevel model; Social environment; Association (psychology); Social stress; Social support","score_opus":0.00966851894004691,"score_gpt":0.26212642522964386,"score_spread":0.25245790628959697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414592679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99856514,0.00024632245,0.000098663106,0.000068121226,0.000007721652,0.000006069702,0.000064289045,0.0000017334402,0.0009419138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999681,0.00008861184,0.00009156656,0.000021381069,0.000004455638,0.000005185442,0.00002951761,6.889707e-7,0.00007766775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996586,0.00017184416,0.000015786753,0.00005567992,0.00003972792,0.00005846296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912304,0.00025553917,0.00030077356,0.000051116313,0.00007732258,0.00019227252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048210972,0.00021942679,0.0002207368,0.0002984947,0.000762748,0.0007867331,0.00019464566,0.00022625588,0.001788289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019341883,0.00011735116,0.0002125312,0.00021216879,0.00047993887,0.00032948266,0.0011868305,0.00025580244,0.00010294444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016485229,0.00010719554,0.9793676,0.00006725813,0.000061370294,0.00019147198,0.0041422937,0.000096678115,0.0018174934,0.00014139872,0.00011623645,0.01372605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013602897,0.000056949248,0.9953538,0.000027476395,0.000013453366,0.0000773897,0.003868959,0.00007338773,0.00013524537,0.00008396919,0.00030409612,0.0000037835014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044541317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014102915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044541317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032323273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037874564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008856416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414736707","doi":"10.1017/lap.2025.10031","title":"Gender Equality in Conditional Cash Transfer Designs: A Disappearing Policy Recipe in Latin America and the World Bank? - Nora Nagels. 2024. Gender Equality in Conditional Cash Transfer Designs: A disappearing policy recipe in Latin America and the World Bank? Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Tables, figures, notes, bibliography, index, 213pp; hardcover $119.99, softcover $39.99.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Latin American Politics and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Conditional cash transfer; Recipe; Gender equality; Transfer (computing); Cash","score_opus":0.04011901966695155,"score_gpt":0.3152077797923504,"score_spread":0.27508876012539885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414736707","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062277084,0.24517111,0.004113209,0.58089477,0.010931468,0.0001544948,0.0009059421,0.00037386583,0.15122744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25624293,0.22996289,0.011102871,0.12600274,0.011038171,0.0021909536,0.001279683,0.00044410158,0.3617357],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965467,0.0021526369,0.00009701769,0.00019243169,0.00051063,0.0005006073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99602556,0.0021296812,0.00034764234,0.00024351233,0.0007731157,0.0004805235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008006716,0.00063415535,0.00044165543,0.00074460026,0.001995739,0.0038825173,0.0010070422,0.002597353,0.07777304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010230233,0.00040669288,0.00034030556,0.0013654674,0.004082682,0.0069394265,0.0037366322,0.0034441147,0.0061980337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023546188,0.0000743168,0.0006001453,0.0004853515,0.0000067323876,0.000037836304,0.0009921748,0.00017599469,0.00020018556,0.14794998,0.65215254,0.19708927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079267644,0.000083432074,0.0022794025,0.0018257658,0.000015604095,0.00004514033,0.0018699006,0.000121785,0.00025230082,0.042179238,0.9512183,0.000029782714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013306052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01469623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07777304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043239486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008950724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26017672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415145629","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5589668","title":"What Did We Learn from the North American Income Maintenance Experiments? New Data and Evidence on Household Behavior and Labor Supply","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Point (geometry); Marital status; Household income; Panel data; Estimation; Statistical evidence","score_opus":0.044216174803265125,"score_gpt":0.3225703757401181,"score_spread":0.278354200936853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415145629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91936713,0.007255887,0.0028260008,0.03968222,0.00035394914,0.000037178816,0.0014444767,0.000022990947,0.029010171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795973,0.005722531,0.002133999,0.007894039,0.00039185843,0.00008693146,0.000772587,0.00003692868,0.0033638088],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983064,0.0009494533,0.00005661518,0.0002520266,0.00030052743,0.00013493447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95903575,0.02952452,0.0027950238,0.0054248595,0.0024194813,0.00080040033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012836064,0.00031233073,0.00076558435,0.00081124186,0.0011405032,0.00150664,0.001121966,0.0011164688,0.0055339313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02662018,0.00031461066,0.00038116254,0.0016339592,0.004338854,0.0038739056,0.0012664547,0.0025608744,0.00046710827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031163066,0.0025924975,0.61401105,0.0012715815,0.0016465471,0.00063626416,0.03181633,0.002171708,0.006158536,0.06859276,0.028541788,0.23944463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111763984,0.00039873392,0.881633,0.0006220238,0.00045921924,0.00012990828,0.021135818,0.00065242825,0.0018465881,0.04197406,0.050933547,0.000102967795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027361378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06089863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027361378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009789468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010935991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067884445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415268365","doi":"10.1111/spol.70016","title":"Measuring the Gender Gap in Unpaid Care Work in Colombia: A Decomposition Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Manitoba Health","funders":"","keywords":"Unpaid work; Socioeconomic status; Care work; Time-use survey; Gender gap; Marital status; Work (physics); Paid work; Child care","score_opus":0.04537471065948938,"score_gpt":0.35954586022058066,"score_spread":0.31417114956109127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415268365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808638,0.0011550187,0.007359446,0.0002360636,0.00004923661,0.0003202056,0.005850004,0.000036148638,0.00412996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98885673,0.0003850883,0.0050138487,0.000027956745,0.000017930526,0.00032284047,0.004193474,0.000011862052,0.0011702765],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864584,0.00041905005,0.000100941565,0.00024570676,0.0002520738,0.00033644782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982486,0.0006803455,0.00031698137,0.00011292665,0.0005054235,0.00013580489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018734337,0.0007554171,0.0006103997,0.0036369683,0.0007929353,0.0015434339,0.0006124796,0.00031548954,0.003341398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048517687,0.00024205832,0.00096856034,0.0034419587,0.0004935643,0.00040149194,0.001407276,0.0004399188,0.00034200316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002155504,0.000106141095,0.9512994,0.0002779217,0.00022250832,0.00014454652,0.0028639599,0.0017606642,0.00043697044,0.0014047705,0.0023109452,0.038956493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011823996,0.000065149805,0.9737094,0.00017478576,0.00010713489,0.000046152858,0.01124485,0.008904108,0.00023006619,0.0007174808,0.0047645555,0.000024424746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1677985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14467472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1677985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028899177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020728714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33364367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415280219","doi":"","title":"Women in Times of Crisis: Rethinking the Extraordinary and the Everyday: Summary of conference presentations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Narrative","score_opus":0.02054338810800668,"score_gpt":0.263751688826978,"score_spread":0.24320830071897134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415280219","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033633348,0.39163637,0.0010413023,0.2754303,0.13160387,0.0007728695,0.0006207274,0.0001070841,0.16515417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2086926,0.46196264,0.0015043734,0.07525101,0.069440626,0.0018628397,0.0007175693,0.00037009554,0.18019812],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724823,0.0014020258,0.000096452175,0.00028337355,0.00035618845,0.0006138078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966935,0.0016163903,0.00012999728,0.000078091514,0.0006427564,0.0008392011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072284127,0.0015808142,0.0010620361,0.0015271156,0.008516149,0.0106533,0.001860233,0.0058889636,0.02657101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069364533,0.0003392701,0.0008536531,0.0042412225,0.003479398,0.0063781044,0.0077224025,0.004844021,0.0019268439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005499067,0.00025653082,0.0010037001,0.0069875075,0.00006295804,0.0006702443,0.16197613,0.000113337985,0.0014294694,0.015918465,0.54131085,0.26972088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030493924,0.00007428905,0.0026525941,0.0030015951,0.000024564699,0.00017484231,0.1648681,0.00001431651,0.00026632744,0.0015444972,0.8273204,0.00002784012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077170837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022052396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02657101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044177305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008881176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08888888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415481924","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0335142","title":"Do women’s autonomy lessen the brunt of unequal household responsibilities in the patriarchal context of semi-arid Northern Ghana?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Autonomy; Laundry; Context (archaeology); Agrarian society; Poverty; Rural area","score_opus":0.05719906887031863,"score_gpt":0.26755703941191566,"score_spread":0.21035797054159705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415481924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968747,0.00046790458,0.000048139085,0.0011961353,0.000008744984,0.000002248731,0.000015183214,6.245001e-7,0.0013862272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999721,0.000118442826,0.000017067197,0.00003658457,0.0000046712325,0.0000010026703,0.000004244425,4.1918625e-7,0.000096534415],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903786,0.00050419196,0.000030263373,0.0001107757,0.000098619385,0.00021835727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689865,0.00094902853,0.001479752,0.00010163899,0.00010385617,0.00046704157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012058974,0.00015465863,0.00020300457,0.00036829564,0.00083625363,0.0011872206,0.00033232916,0.0003595213,0.0030246484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055462285,0.00019183676,0.00015383646,0.00042736655,0.0032248239,0.001099707,0.0012654106,0.0005340974,0.00011557476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014956822,0.00006977573,0.92083347,0.00006873472,0.000039876282,0.0007218256,0.05695177,0.00006679154,0.00054777524,0.0020303582,0.00042318983,0.01809687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010447382,0.00009574544,0.90205675,0.00011233912,0.000013346867,0.0007554786,0.09109329,0.00010440893,0.00011183765,0.0018024726,0.0038337384,0.000010166396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006638682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01232567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006638682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082854484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008998536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013200045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415915153","doi":"10.16995/rhetm.20252","title":"Oli Hawrylyshyn’s Contribution to the Economic Valuation of Unpaid Domestic Work","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of the history of economic thought and methodology.","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unpaid work; Work (physics); Valuation (finance); Economic analysis; Domestic work","score_opus":0.11380846470244632,"score_gpt":0.3718280685922456,"score_spread":0.2580196038897993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415915153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01562751,0.17555234,0.010983697,0.31436378,0.03152404,0.000054083008,0.0006604834,0.00007008292,0.451164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41646624,0.17418316,0.011979174,0.03216058,0.03373776,0.00015723544,0.0005791414,0.0003815998,0.33035514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973495,0.0008279675,0.000107516724,0.00039751214,0.0010861742,0.00023129123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99179804,0.004918245,0.0004072829,0.00032783733,0.0020816564,0.0004668998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025824206,0.00060452294,0.000511643,0.0025325587,0.0019800947,0.0069397264,0.00078550196,0.0023238976,0.012054665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779949,0.00025510005,0.00035377807,0.0027518703,0.0045290594,0.0065080267,0.0030657754,0.004342741,0.0026845464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007282458,0.00008011422,0.0022690783,0.0003330714,0.00001849793,0.00023167719,0.0035979857,0.00045313884,0.00016949607,0.528219,0.33992144,0.124633774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004058076,0.000013368,0.0022003101,0.00075712526,0.000006104583,0.0001974484,0.0013593299,0.00047238494,0.00015087902,0.11148793,0.8833128,0.00003832234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0105355065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012054665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006690446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043160217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048542798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416041751","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v16i1.78194","title":"Social Policy Trends: Low Income Entry and Exit Rates","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Low income; Social policy; Social security; Public policy; Consumption (sociology)","score_opus":0.04923736590908409,"score_gpt":0.3592151903165544,"score_spread":0.30997782440747035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416041751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98029375,0.00071879657,0.00009596622,0.004181794,0.000055393295,0.000009408992,0.0028885435,0.000018886887,0.011737458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98936546,0.00059522316,0.000035768793,0.0002720429,0.0000826797,0.000009205523,0.0020367,0.00001459297,0.0075883246],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941015,0.000097290336,0.000044919612,0.000086644046,0.000106119725,0.0002548269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944575,0.0010571048,0.0020743543,0.00019726022,0.00093397585,0.0012798241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011124108,0.00013606786,0.00025924327,0.0018359727,0.00073275086,0.0018807488,0.0005082885,0.0010345066,0.01541766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005196073,0.00013822627,0.00041487,0.002806314,0.0004023101,0.0019989973,0.0009012591,0.0015509651,0.0016884779],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011455064,0.00008469278,0.9830835,0.000028225608,0.00001795142,0.00005582199,0.001162502,0.00007369881,0.00013729923,0.0017229026,0.003479579,0.010039281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027435979,0.000028778928,0.994941,0.000023956678,0.0000071147024,0.000031230116,0.0023939938,0.00010462899,0.000059921604,0.0001953931,0.0022080052,0.0000034244483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031216955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04632801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031216955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006724864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011402153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06207049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416058824","doi":"10.1093/sp/jxaf044","title":"Bringing Women Back into the (Collective) Kitchen: The Case of the Ley de comedores sociales in Mexico City","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citizenship; Framing (construction); Latin Americans; Mexico city; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Social citizenship","score_opus":0.07938173506270375,"score_gpt":0.3825873138195411,"score_spread":0.30320557875683735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416058824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775417,0.0003803513,0.00024351747,0.008114173,0.000044845172,0.000030817202,0.00003923181,0.0000069972925,0.01359838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926071,0.00030781963,0.00013998909,0.0007869236,0.000027813045,0.000049375485,0.000020421126,0.0000067464703,0.0060537634],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857116,0.00062727596,0.000015486085,0.00011283675,0.00007025676,0.00060298597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989048,0.0004791741,0.00017990866,0.000056127385,0.000078825666,0.0003011188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014718153,0.00030109164,0.0003439545,0.0007482879,0.023126088,0.0037457123,0.001246432,0.002407726,0.005490928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017924664,0.00032630013,0.00022209277,0.00086204783,0.010048171,0.0018406013,0.004952373,0.0025646081,0.00015302566],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008895787,0.00012836004,0.027157554,0.00013066396,0.00002164849,0.008303917,0.92055035,0.00019978124,0.00096333865,0.026973704,0.0058459374,0.009635841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066022108,0.00003544769,0.012362094,0.00010125176,0.000011082444,0.0002653435,0.9383282,0.00007526337,0.0002006669,0.0006451627,0.047955364,0.000013523648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14615564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2987027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14615564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011407283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043590553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2906099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416533261","doi":"10.1111/spol.70032","title":"What Are the Determinants of Permanent and Temporary Non‐Take‐Up of the French Minimum‐Income Benefit?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Welfare; Renting; Poverty; Credibility; Residence; Solidarity; Order (exchange); Salient","score_opus":0.024806442416992352,"score_gpt":0.326007367652191,"score_spread":0.30120092523519865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416533261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99459404,0.00042539305,0.00017868252,0.0019654927,0.000011944148,0.000009869314,0.00059074623,0.000008435225,0.0022152825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988254,0.0000698218,0.00004043994,0.000041608968,0.000011997423,0.0000042988586,0.00024281188,0.0000020612108,0.0007615216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980241,0.00059322297,0.0000836365,0.00027949887,0.000301332,0.000718223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890884,0.0038654616,0.004335702,0.0004086586,0.00071500853,0.001586706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002108323,0.00014003315,0.00036697122,0.0010333699,0.0007709343,0.0016041786,0.00062963227,0.00073674443,0.0072198124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077250223,0.00012902693,0.0005915626,0.00084716326,0.00065997965,0.00061987416,0.0006893911,0.0009662768,0.0005937209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006754368,0.00006977161,0.99033725,0.000011415337,0.000056791905,0.00010799195,0.00054449687,0.00030077228,0.00012643456,0.0013136179,0.0006757278,0.0063882396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024849764,0.000041024192,0.99677354,0.000012804774,0.000010227976,0.000050430353,0.001080573,0.0005003094,0.000049809754,0.00020295891,0.0012701064,0.000005656257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11075367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09255735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11075367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015423313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011909793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.220218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416555642","doi":"10.64628/aam.d4msmjfa5","title":"Motherhood changes how women spend, save and think about money","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.020322100864854514,"score_gpt":0.26952960221654887,"score_spread":0.24920750135169437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416555642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95444083,0.00097444904,0.0004125215,0.0070904,0.00016533253,0.0000060416864,0.00006432651,0.000010936346,0.036835186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955936,0.00027657772,0.00008978222,0.00026640613,0.000011178358,0.000003426348,0.000011065937,0.00000765815,0.00374035],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908185,0.00055520603,0.000012229563,0.000066651766,0.00005857356,0.00022540304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861133,0.0006720634,0.0002222603,0.000065747525,0.00007151468,0.0003570102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010829122,0.00017728389,0.00017614619,0.00033530538,0.002768208,0.0032552348,0.00039756182,0.0007841693,0.013085026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003949475,0.00017648023,0.00017315536,0.0003029188,0.003108126,0.0016920827,0.0014524879,0.0011207957,0.00056676904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011433276,0.0007695559,0.2175261,0.00016844449,0.00016769498,0.0023491662,0.59944236,0.00023610407,0.005156417,0.07348008,0.0142071415,0.08535377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071379305,0.00025789806,0.20484573,0.00022510577,0.0000830154,0.0006853204,0.6955129,0.00021486812,0.0012369347,0.017614812,0.07919867,0.000053428113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005234537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010888468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013085026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011779604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012967143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04377383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416771018","doi":"10.5539/jel.v15n2p160","title":"Strategies on Movement for Welfare Provision Andemployment Networking with the Principles of Solidarity of informal Female Worker in Loei Province","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education and Learning","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Thailand Science Research and Innovation","keywords":"Welfare; Workforce; Focus group; Solidarity; Qualitative property; Qualitative research; Buddhism; Social Welfare; Social work; Grounded theory","score_opus":0.021565606955561485,"score_gpt":0.3114852227093337,"score_spread":0.28991961575377223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416771018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94350195,0.00071017374,0.0020085226,0.006255283,0.00006484586,0.00026214006,0.000018971914,0.000032405605,0.04714568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99093425,0.0003339407,0.0010204163,0.0002792741,0.000008978107,0.00009415327,0.000014738727,0.0000047790313,0.007309478],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862576,0.0006643902,0.000028403289,0.000061051156,0.00009295227,0.00052738795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988105,0.00025593332,0.00020093838,0.0000332229,0.00009116127,0.000608101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020735038,0.00030080843,0.00014153749,0.0006489921,0.009364323,0.0022598235,0.0011754878,0.0008257716,0.0039647436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001830331,0.00020105783,0.00015007978,0.0004863122,0.0030075712,0.0017382676,0.0061660805,0.0009737979,0.00026353865],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013971269,0.00040729923,0.04900001,0.00049527537,0.000012101408,0.0035450847,0.7595585,0.00029490987,0.003548107,0.01850179,0.0043850164,0.16011229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016391401,0.00021254909,0.023871839,0.00035709346,0.000009113406,0.0005273054,0.91270244,0.0002895493,0.00042219952,0.0022757642,0.059296966,0.000018754485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017601917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041306105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017601917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035511015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008469456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034998894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416807958","doi":"10.1163/9789004750593_5","title":"Feedlot Welfare Standards in the United States and Canada","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Feedlot; Government (linguistics); Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.012781863182221341,"score_gpt":0.2500667003719292,"score_spread":0.23728483718970783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416807958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17384213,0.033172566,0.0016361984,0.016017068,0.0006008395,0.00011262707,0.00538783,0.0002748156,0.7689559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48480922,0.012327888,0.0019520196,0.0011512294,0.000046078952,0.00006510345,0.0018935816,0.00010745932,0.49764737],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984363,0.00012037512,0.000039051916,0.00009903507,0.0009054243,0.00039983023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791604,0.0002502953,0.00009757664,0.000045862704,0.0014002258,0.00029002634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011280704,0.0001934731,0.0002703982,0.0020919133,0.005985508,0.004517328,0.0012994052,0.0006386738,0.007630455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027577823,0.00025576295,0.00018803269,0.00521091,0.0017464594,0.0006629229,0.0006181175,0.0010698589,0.00042502477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016323457,0.0001560737,0.043892052,0.0002674652,0.000030685118,0.0002554635,0.017794965,0.0034771857,0.0012405879,0.29158208,0.242945,0.39819512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000115858,0.000046169964,0.2959214,0.0005614219,0.000019040697,0.000056711873,0.017849917,0.0013176592,0.0006092904,0.004477397,0.67906123,0.00006823823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99854517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10516179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10516179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12960176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7630058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417194311","doi":"10.7202/1120222ar","title":"Public Policy for Women: The State, Income Security, and Labour Market Issues","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Public policy; Basic income; Government (linguistics); Social policy; Wage; Productivity","score_opus":0.05067652518100306,"score_gpt":0.3810213240667877,"score_spread":0.3303447988857846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417194311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03868766,0.00929916,0.00051377265,0.84859836,0.00094859605,0.000020287593,0.00011971479,0.000018205325,0.101794265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84128565,0.008481838,0.00034714764,0.096918054,0.002518615,0.000111079025,0.00005815228,0.00002950192,0.050249897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968636,0.0014537568,0.000062087965,0.00017820873,0.0003279558,0.0011144715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99522555,0.0033088946,0.00029855836,0.00012989002,0.00034325142,0.0006938493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006627835,0.00036817492,0.00047558814,0.0013173473,0.009810743,0.0114365565,0.0009634812,0.008710697,0.01643452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011277085,0.00027439397,0.0004932783,0.0015476369,0.010410245,0.0055449638,0.004386589,0.007656116,0.00056092034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065214306,0.00010084622,0.0032127907,0.00011358868,0.000014849178,0.0002382987,0.010040896,0.00020255805,0.00016757328,0.9252142,0.03994199,0.020687142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008881739,0.00008343097,0.011966682,0.0013738759,0.00006830889,0.00018982834,0.05181308,0.00070879137,0.0006572573,0.4244301,0.50856817,0.000051657982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025344282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041594744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025344282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009653673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013873163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07004261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W562274058","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139030663.007","title":"Promoting Equity in Economic Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Content (measure theory); Business; Public economics; Internet privacy; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03841177685884044,"score_gpt":0.25466915421790304,"score_spread":0.21625737735906259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W562274058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001703225,0.007266334,0.0018642099,0.008432668,0.00034765954,0.000027302205,0.000026883921,0.000028818346,0.98030293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17686132,0.019746043,0.004586855,0.005929299,0.000873008,0.00017149717,0.000085930275,0.00011298942,0.791633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901974,0.00030722472,0.000017350161,0.00009131247,0.00033701578,0.00022733361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953365,0.00024020633,0.000024351006,0.00007634451,0.00006307839,0.00006242525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018521987,0.00035782432,0.00023751614,0.00078329584,0.0015116236,0.0050014704,0.0005076489,0.00210511,0.03482694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002758223,0.00015953497,0.00019438432,0.00079148705,0.0049053845,0.0053756367,0.004269398,0.0031094057,0.0045613614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003459134,0.000013040536,0.0000842106,0.00005459554,0.0000011481018,0.000022123755,0.00085838843,0.00009331885,0.00014011076,0.9027307,0.046393864,0.049605012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006485321,0.000010135576,0.0006434244,0.0005769823,0.0000030899794,0.00006242671,0.00079564383,0.00014184418,0.00035908128,0.2811018,0.71629405,0.000005061719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020793818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003842487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03482694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023401156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026151673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11650771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W57339754","doi":"","title":"Some Comments on Canada, Women, Gender, and Race","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Social History","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Gender studies; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02669940054532314,"score_gpt":0.29478208106747084,"score_spread":0.2680826805221477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W57339754","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00051934994,0.034114953,0.0001598645,0.93576705,0.019702611,0.000013360854,0.00032205295,0.00001528546,0.009385568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010489355,0.040406067,0.0005003654,0.90492105,0.02157319,0.000058267386,0.00016722895,0.00008040263,0.02180408],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99375397,0.0010209915,0.00036238204,0.0006955728,0.0029666254,0.0012004583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96474695,0.014805007,0.0015930267,0.0006756837,0.015143599,0.003035664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008733339,0.0009934367,0.0018089827,0.0031391317,0.013521059,0.0066105407,0.005046568,0.014409298,0.014914207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030952621,0.00057622965,0.0010837065,0.009595707,0.013745566,0.0062309047,0.0032834872,0.017039135,0.0019282857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019899257,0.000006589408,0.00083097577,0.00019418215,0.000013663417,0.000090011104,0.0019766001,0.000032500586,0.00006150887,0.016362462,0.9735521,0.006859599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017189803,0.000008002254,0.0045513446,0.00109817,0.000024038525,0.000078734396,0.008079355,0.000023058416,0.00006186378,0.003960317,0.9820519,0.00004601296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8409043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91866565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1590957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021685582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048124753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32006526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W607167054","doi":"10.4135/9781446263778","title":"Welfare Theory and Development","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Social policy; Sociology; Social citizenship; Welfare capitalism; Social Welfare; Politics; Welfare; Political economy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025514242117345813,"score_gpt":0.251934378290702,"score_spread":0.22642013617335616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W607167054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024258078,0.14553383,0.014530067,0.087572485,0.0025506297,0.00014402808,0.00027999445,0.00008351691,0.7468795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42422023,0.18336362,0.017576924,0.042254586,0.0060787275,0.0014334639,0.00052036426,0.00034964507,0.32420245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606234,0.0021821235,0.00014252728,0.00063854427,0.0005289866,0.00044545744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980615,0.0012223436,0.0001198263,0.00020817995,0.00025346287,0.00013474513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004954575,0.0014355944,0.0016388171,0.0020990795,0.00429738,0.011480334,0.0017690975,0.0063511785,0.017090475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053488547,0.0005246616,0.0006816364,0.0037198933,0.031188624,0.010817755,0.0045884983,0.0077693863,0.0028954067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015837319,0.000006631765,0.000032501634,0.000028204991,0.0000016799371,0.000008959822,0.00041454722,0.00008453565,0.000008063537,0.9906378,0.006011625,0.002763863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064215774,0.00001057839,0.00012721268,0.0003020506,0.000002312661,0.00003361488,0.0007735191,0.00012438557,0.000021068177,0.7547433,0.24384934,0.000006070453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013411916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007105752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017090475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011385965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008228946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08261132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W615586350","doi":"","title":"Twenty-first-century motherhood : experience, identity, policy, agency","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Columbia University Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Queer; Sociology; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political science; History","score_opus":0.01896645979797393,"score_gpt":0.2470747381724541,"score_spread":0.22810827837448017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W615586350","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07770551,0.42971405,0.0007556521,0.15240926,0.005973463,0.00005240075,0.0002472937,0.00007264925,0.3330697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6544862,0.19002242,0.00045342903,0.016913231,0.0030313144,0.00018342077,0.0001558973,0.00007236897,0.13468172],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982103,0.0010465174,0.000053088505,0.00014657591,0.0002347516,0.0003087497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988475,0.00050009164,0.00012622542,0.000060891474,0.00010197472,0.0003633303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022752406,0.0004726093,0.00044601425,0.0007912612,0.0129050845,0.009134416,0.00068561285,0.0022668247,0.011349144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002241155,0.00030366424,0.00015207841,0.001955396,0.014860242,0.005564927,0.0053716972,0.003578697,0.0013095228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029447017,0.00007233359,0.0015819342,0.000284734,0.0000052556725,0.00078464556,0.636526,0.000036782316,0.00029231558,0.21776202,0.10668362,0.035940934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027979092,0.000022974722,0.0015757532,0.00065496186,0.0000015294972,0.0003278242,0.1898034,0.0000098799665,0.000047041143,0.0049297144,0.8026144,0.000009736017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013796514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018242385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013796514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054339226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045919647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03942603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W622874139","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2586421","title":"How the Demand for Labor May Adapt to the Availability of Labor: A Preliminary Exploration with Historical Data","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Labor demand; Labor disputes; Labor relations; Economics; Business; Wage","score_opus":0.06356130100825565,"score_gpt":0.2920683588752001,"score_spread":0.22850705786694447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W622874139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855254,0.0005330057,0.0015747815,0.0005222721,0.000012113794,0.000022109312,0.0035783048,0.000007648414,0.008224334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972664,0.00020949688,0.00046613882,0.00002167201,0.000009075697,0.000013836609,0.0009768741,0.000006997896,0.0010295579],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993622,0.0002710559,0.0000633579,0.0001304635,0.00007379937,0.00009920407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934394,0.004245284,0.0011729444,0.00049572723,0.00046777172,0.0001789591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019237796,0.00015980034,0.00022881843,0.0015273563,0.0007057633,0.0015760432,0.00056611624,0.00047967111,0.009122128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008187166,0.00021156578,0.00024998933,0.0032182306,0.0009276643,0.0020260592,0.0006819138,0.0006173636,0.00076948357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013802719,0.00007757938,0.95911676,0.00013909397,0.00006079412,0.00035638665,0.007953487,0.0017315239,0.0005034382,0.010919522,0.0012696056,0.017733764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008991815,0.00013903859,0.9518574,0.0001566049,0.00005386134,0.00041868136,0.016601406,0.0043780003,0.0006672226,0.0043137074,0.021364652,0.000040489474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01602044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031549424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01602044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058958237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031271897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03185439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W624476462","doi":"","title":"Are people money rich and time poor in Japan","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Time preference; Leisure time; Economics; Product (mathematics); Goods and services; Quality (philosophy); Time-use survey; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Work (physics); Economy","score_opus":0.015240280773014122,"score_gpt":0.2680361549390081,"score_spread":0.252795874165994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W624476462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862912,0.0017476084,0.000043166914,0.004055539,0.00007577489,0.000011078359,0.0008764808,0.0000072329008,0.006891859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99314356,0.0022310144,0.00006979151,0.0014229724,0.00005351994,0.000030062622,0.00045668214,0.0000054603875,0.0025868895],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995876,0.000059145754,0.000048451806,0.00006040175,0.000053994812,0.00019039845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989347,0.00010373931,0.00039664618,0.00005162047,0.0001191525,0.00039405256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057438284,0.00021099146,0.000479025,0.0017405596,0.0040765326,0.0021218169,0.00030539228,0.0007133316,0.004778128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016642214,0.0002179183,0.00025518346,0.0028882446,0.0011659247,0.0024170855,0.0015621479,0.0005867028,0.00066379254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002137762,0.00015766283,0.9313462,0.0002214907,0.000054818876,0.0016103492,0.032056868,0.000030020165,0.0004906719,0.0017046115,0.009377721,0.022735871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011530292,0.000069752285,0.8784347,0.000113434,0.00007986118,0.000715669,0.10475269,0.00004471492,0.00008963942,0.00074003823,0.014914258,0.000033704473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046860967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04642056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046860967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094169495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097515207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093176425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W634426192","doi":"10.9783/9780812202472","title":"Western Welfare in Decline","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":182,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.030485844464566342,"score_gpt":0.23612850678818847,"score_spread":0.20564266232362213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W634426192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010083574,0.0105513325,0.0002629645,0.007495184,0.000733725,0.000019048446,0.000077296594,0.000049961483,0.97072685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05548653,0.01044295,0.00033647972,0.004173331,0.00019050707,0.000061587845,0.00016760833,0.00006875982,0.9290722],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998828,0.000026042335,0.0000045349407,0.000016199256,0.00003157726,0.000038827176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99991894,0.000013720466,0.0000052188884,0.0000067786827,0.000030077397,0.000025228677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002517118,0.00029407628,0.00014096277,0.00060182845,0.0037245683,0.0031792116,0.00033106867,0.0009336402,0.025091205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042555973,0.00013048331,0.00012851256,0.0011141134,0.0012916095,0.0023420001,0.0016232389,0.0011436216,0.004326522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026111424,0.000059464444,0.0010372183,0.00011717672,0.000003451331,0.00046923733,0.023892008,0.000052962718,0.00039311958,0.13912871,0.70450723,0.13031328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015803562,0.000004745626,0.0009596954,0.000103376566,0.0000012866977,0.00006698865,0.003686339,0.000013785315,0.000052520103,0.0035184685,0.99158925,0.0000018085502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025645124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0777767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025645124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002039705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021051923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08393842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W642636351","doi":"","title":"Demographics and the Changing Canadian Family","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Payment; Work (physics); Inequality; Paid work; Parental leave; Child support; Division of labour; Demographics; Reproduction; Family Leave; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Labour economics; Political science; Demography; Finance","score_opus":0.06405612677159848,"score_gpt":0.28865514033811607,"score_spread":0.22459901356651757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W642636351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7950573,0.006734621,0.0006079714,0.027966563,0.00034294964,0.0000897064,0.0034598196,0.000063520856,0.16567762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677749,0.0046171313,0.0003670963,0.0013080775,0.00003737322,0.00003000174,0.0005339244,0.000029333483,0.02530214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981476,0.00014326081,0.000039289753,0.00015710702,0.0005307477,0.0009820524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980263,0.00009014962,0.0001705131,0.00005458389,0.00083822705,0.0008202985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013860244,0.00022850122,0.00023093303,0.002819946,0.021539133,0.0035408055,0.0011774332,0.00065062026,0.008910246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031504326,0.00020531325,0.0002464541,0.005957374,0.0033513391,0.00161458,0.0024308052,0.0011041558,0.0005271123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018073061,0.000057378176,0.30692947,0.00019020322,0.000024499688,0.0023983244,0.2887677,0.0005559001,0.0011162442,0.14554109,0.06637331,0.18786521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065899803,0.00003639904,0.32813022,0.0002090182,0.000011681169,0.0006497125,0.25097513,0.0002269674,0.00018888083,0.0036755558,0.4157718,0.00011795876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098739445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.098739445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.088046856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71640813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W642823573","doi":"10.7202/028961ar","title":"Determinants of Weekly Work Hours in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); History; Demographic economics; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.025961727697404964,"score_gpt":0.26349480779670925,"score_spread":0.2375330800993043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W642823573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856705,0.0008087361,0.0002402787,0.0013623509,0.000026808977,0.000019860858,0.0036201356,0.000028458973,0.008222906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99547523,0.00034631626,0.00011656388,0.00003613688,0.0000072113826,0.0000057281527,0.0007748059,0.000010469601,0.0032276176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991596,0.000052771742,0.00002922033,0.00007396865,0.0002592643,0.0004252478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655557,0.0003836079,0.00046434533,0.0000912312,0.0012661349,0.0012391029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005047671,0.0001959101,0.00028280416,0.0018598436,0.0029576481,0.0015415627,0.00097548246,0.00034089814,0.0058413316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033076121,0.0002192898,0.00037235522,0.0037781622,0.0006796518,0.0002888448,0.00075586827,0.0007953528,0.00032923243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012705257,0.000052399788,0.97540843,0.00003427285,0.000053119034,0.00018118738,0.0019611851,0.0013774475,0.00041082632,0.002215552,0.0035056057,0.014672912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033225895,0.0000079949305,0.9944224,0.000026793648,0.000006464731,0.000019458992,0.0018779204,0.0005463204,0.000049301132,0.00012261898,0.002906776,0.0000106742455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024197942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024197942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03077235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17556918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W644351097","doi":"","title":"1 BILLION A DAY","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Traffic world","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subtitle; Business; Containerization; Finance; Operations management; Engineering; Aeronautics; Transport engineering; Container (type theory); Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.03507124328221693,"score_gpt":0.26640797180655673,"score_spread":0.23133672852433979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W644351097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035937203,0.0037292321,0.00045347415,0.026783887,0.014148793,0.00008514134,0.02443723,0.0018825887,0.9248858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045701065,0.0013263474,0.00014778484,0.0025667886,0.0010494522,0.000024083904,0.004642111,0.00016820725,0.98550504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998404,0.000008923648,0.000006065965,0.000016821534,0.00009304101,0.000034652814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995913,0.000025299712,0.000028353094,0.000017608345,0.00022604509,0.000111446316],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012749752,0.00059381453,0.00027274218,0.0009047515,0.0014501177,0.0023778612,0.00037483854,0.0010217733,0.4914582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007171059,0.00016468986,0.0002548256,0.0010313783,0.0002566668,0.0012281769,0.0009785631,0.0014105801,0.32588434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001183106,0.000005093403,0.00010872701,0.000029360086,7.9419857e-7,0.0000129326445,0.000021146892,0.000007666387,0.00012381587,0.0006478186,0.98747593,0.011554768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022228446,0.000003873114,0.00060525985,0.000016141963,7.5237e-7,0.000014223716,0.000068408495,0.000015992962,0.000046482626,0.000085540305,0.9991392,0.0000019054057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034725092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056218203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4914582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067243516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010174758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72537315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W646211846","doi":"10.22610/jebs.v4i6.332","title":"On Governance and the Demographic Transition","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Development Research Centre","funders":"Global Development Network; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Economics; Voting; Fertility; Unemployment; Investment (military); Overlapping generations model; Quality (philosophy); Corporate governance; Control (management); Labour economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Finance; Population; Political science","score_opus":0.05411442509305065,"score_gpt":0.30825243338775477,"score_spread":0.2541380082947041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W646211846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5895734,0.013593623,0.009389239,0.09085538,0.00027913364,0.000079300495,0.00061876886,0.000057462927,0.29555368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99156684,0.001997984,0.0003532498,0.0009457996,0.00006236996,0.000013169256,0.00003891164,0.000005459918,0.005016129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995958,0.00020103807,0.000010378712,0.000045604924,0.00002826855,0.000118888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915123,0.00030310295,0.00020216539,0.000048177935,0.00008666927,0.00020861525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010289409,0.00008490629,0.00013728981,0.00049157307,0.001003188,0.0018875117,0.00019542074,0.0007241592,0.0048619327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002155887,0.00006534283,0.00012840392,0.00050751853,0.00299838,0.0015301069,0.0012937931,0.00076509465,0.00021708982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019844696,0.000033220906,0.01586932,0.000019042063,0.0000057777584,0.00012130526,0.0016148235,0.0011846987,0.00013027292,0.9558535,0.0041017146,0.021046355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016925385,0.000056679557,0.056569267,0.00017134086,0.000010299793,0.00017335378,0.0044581797,0.0025489195,0.00017811329,0.8187632,0.11703433,0.000019437462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070868256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008256052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070868256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017782544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008968026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016264737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W646666083","doi":"10.1016/s1529-2126(2005)9","title":"Gender Realities: Local and Global","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Advances in gender research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.09099993946761599,"score_gpt":0.42891083886812187,"score_spread":0.3379108994005059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W646666083","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009512235,0.4869587,0.0041841124,0.10653507,0.018390978,0.00009402993,0.0011282489,0.00018571485,0.37301093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26472813,0.48725358,0.006709615,0.039434087,0.03795078,0.0005205287,0.0015331454,0.0005653312,0.16130488],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853957,0.0006917363,0.000068950845,0.00017219351,0.00033367056,0.000193898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826044,0.00092926953,0.00018311678,0.00011694967,0.00026446886,0.00024574783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018832998,0.00087746826,0.0007721058,0.0029755787,0.0021899336,0.0055872463,0.00096054823,0.0017283395,0.04044904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030562195,0.0004914187,0.00046306947,0.005159009,0.0058564614,0.00975347,0.0042454074,0.0032701665,0.0060228705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060715123,0.0000727361,0.0037881238,0.0013604251,0.000021291742,0.00031613867,0.021431666,0.00021982954,0.00041524746,0.33981565,0.37073418,0.2617641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031531426,0.000027341224,0.003823818,0.0012232249,0.0000052299015,0.0004409106,0.018617032,0.00005780304,0.000045517823,0.03641839,0.9393177,0.000019817793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039204303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060983365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04044904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002194211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015974994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13531554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6887198723","doi":"10.15468/dl.wey743","title":"Occurrence Download","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Global Biodiversity Information Facility","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Matching (statistics); Range (aeronautics); Data set; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.0203085998323265,"score_gpt":0.24620477786409273,"score_spread":0.22589617803176623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6887198723","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004596197,0.00002355707,0.00003755212,0.000031480842,0.000009786513,0.000004995702,0.9990845,0.00024688998,0.0005152796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00016207637,0.000030155574,0.00017551043,0.00003827522,0.0000033201372,0.00004478528,0.9989943,0.000102857375,0.00044877824],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902713,0.00014582882,0.00012395986,0.00032936636,0.00021511709,0.0001586242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977296,0.0006542399,0.00023338033,0.00055975525,0.0005418318,0.0002811662],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010205499,0.0018578989,0.0015077321,0.004789984,0.0009628356,0.0024576986,0.0026756844,0.0020301726,0.14061882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005503138,0.00085597043,0.001065396,0.01006166,0.00045456673,0.0019372588,0.0023125228,0.0019600303,0.19768968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027972848,0.000012912667,0.00044285378,0.00047694318,0.000014046301,0.000015172965,0.00002514937,0.00012391109,0.0000916863,0.00035778468,0.9971047,0.0013067577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008541773,0.000008539016,0.0023386655,0.00019354769,0.000013490927,0.000037162183,0.00008569466,0.00016024655,0.00015991236,0.0007507497,0.9961492,0.000017251934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021702588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038340338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8593812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00151218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021665494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47041678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6904749811","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0311895.s010","title":"Associations between preterm birth and employment income and employment per year, at or after the age of 18 years for individuals born in 1990–1996 in Canada in the subsample linked to maternal tax with and without matching on maternal income and rural residence.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Household income; Socioeconomic status; Premature birth; Propensity score matching; Population; Birth weight","score_opus":0.033723981011805834,"score_gpt":0.29217993636133954,"score_spread":0.2584559553495337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6904749811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8018397,0.0029542681,0.00027030258,0.0007542336,0.00016807254,0.000082323,0.18901932,0.00013194581,0.0047798273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9335328,0.0012895478,0.00034082882,0.00019442022,0.000045150176,0.000062996565,0.057877526,0.000039671195,0.0066170017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994004,0.00004468085,0.000051855714,0.00013677898,0.000111997455,0.0002543978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964695,0.00032904238,0.0011954092,0.00020549986,0.00078764383,0.0010129614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006367906,0.00048602643,0.0007149179,0.0016605004,0.0013457079,0.0008473037,0.0017558243,0.00079478644,0.0083294185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030706031,0.00049265387,0.0016410368,0.004015689,0.00046697317,0.0005410397,0.00092238013,0.0012410028,0.0007334317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008717883,0.000044408014,0.96746796,0.00015955929,0.0006382106,0.0001730824,0.00027149092,0.00038433418,0.00018990229,0.00019733781,0.02342056,0.0061814627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003355498,0.000022173095,0.9978719,0.0000500768,0.00013329943,0.00004766478,0.0002937594,0.00022587823,0.000035363977,0.000030213498,0.0012464264,0.000009801023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98249406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9843546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017505944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044128024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011107894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6906447676","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/k8dsn","title":"Practical Documentation of Qualifying Research Activities for the SR&amp;ED Tax Credit","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Tax credit; Work (physics); Income tax; Earned income tax credit; Deferred tax","score_opus":0.11778947897588463,"score_gpt":0.4377484501565768,"score_spread":0.31995897118069216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6906447676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02610577,0.0009105042,0.041319657,0.06519182,0.018460117,0.054623798,0.042534146,0.019282127,0.7315721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031731006,0.00043258033,0.029227674,0.0063277194,0.0010233588,0.013720833,0.007495554,0.0016862159,0.90835506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97729415,0.0047949534,0.0029926405,0.0011797126,0.008965699,0.0047728857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7856245,0.022998974,0.004768139,0.027893247,0.13319188,0.025523277],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036556147,0.00091094483,0.0013374712,0.0077195563,0.012653978,0.007957284,0.0046383925,0.0060341884,0.3396749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11076014,0.0018635801,0.00088236335,0.0043509398,0.0019080642,0.0038761161,0.005643704,0.005500946,0.13918914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015464994,0.00022041377,0.0010122637,0.00007130337,0.0000030794756,0.00011539877,0.00042217216,0.00012046332,0.00040921234,0.004937696,0.94797444,0.04455884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019627587,0.00015450215,0.012056832,0.00024646372,0.0000080906175,0.00012414527,0.002331426,0.0009891614,0.0008691448,0.0021256704,0.9807859,0.000112345486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19250624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.396888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3396749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017854784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07900577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9418736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6908393302","doi":"10.26190/unsworks/254","title":"No Child Left Behind?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; TSG101; Hyporeflexia; Gestational period; Diafiltration; Articular cartilage damage; Pretext","score_opus":0.015600524414555157,"score_gpt":0.2381729071308798,"score_spread":0.22257238271632465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6908393302","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23212934,0.01900228,0.00045509753,0.43928283,0.005861331,0.00004544693,0.0022193985,0.000033708227,0.3009707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82372606,0.009904358,0.00024198763,0.06279033,0.00092118466,0.000067310735,0.00059210806,0.000025865953,0.10173087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992761,0.00017512117,0.000018132956,0.00011196771,0.00009797621,0.00032079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945086,0.00011024142,0.00011218441,0.000015740063,0.000063635125,0.00024725296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066450523,0.000135674,0.00025683988,0.0004891437,0.0036721742,0.0016604111,0.00029917076,0.0013685093,0.028210917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028552902,0.000075286174,0.00016974627,0.00057007413,0.0017649486,0.0022197254,0.0017226114,0.0018225515,0.002143848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012593571,0.0001257419,0.0798788,0.00015709481,0.000019526606,0.0036616863,0.061472774,0.000060677023,0.00024684874,0.30627742,0.42806596,0.119907595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019727584,0.000105790954,0.03749771,0.00072534016,0.000022572256,0.0042910157,0.16200101,0.000088901594,0.00026642872,0.033725243,0.7612183,0.000038053193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016051318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030324694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028210917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015634983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018996132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094374895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6920615664","doi":"10.60692/tfvmg-66e02","title":"PROTOCOL: The impact of agricultural mechanisation on women's economic empowerment: A mixed‐methods systematic review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic impact analysis; Agriculture; Systematic review; Mechanization; Agricultural productivity; Impact assessment","score_opus":0.04138062464593982,"score_gpt":0.32700119315886167,"score_spread":0.28562056851292184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6920615664","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042317162,0.0013544972,0.0012023568,0.0012866091,0.0007260761,0.9863675,0.0077309194,0.00016064449,0.0007483077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003966745,0.0005232637,0.0023090392,0.00028392446,0.00003783458,0.9957359,0.0003495021,0.000014127276,0.00034980872],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9236883,0.03565539,0.023993105,0.0041955663,0.009627471,0.0028401876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8672242,0.058947615,0.01836255,0.010873879,0.04042262,0.0041689924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14208205,0.0048172334,0.014099919,0.012889579,0.004543704,0.009382613,0.005394974,0.010451298,0.12759444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21959238,0.0065279184,0.012244475,0.012373413,0.0057116672,0.010124231,0.0070217256,0.009128751,0.017347932],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0076853456,0.0002971671,0.00081897783,0.8337554,0.0019996488,0.00036226277,0.003758445,0.0008585982,0.001389958,0.006433011,0.090065606,0.052575566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.049751982,0.0018231745,0.0046497574,0.674466,0.0060841115,0.0003718637,0.003878349,0.0013992434,0.0024119958,0.015021745,0.23949647,0.0006453355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007938062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0124671245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14208205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01734716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07412206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75141066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6926570324","doi":"10.25549/wpacards-m55711","title":"WPA household census for 107 S ST LOUIS ST, Los Angeles","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"University of Southern California Digital Library","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"St louis; Census; Population; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.01921302028480333,"score_gpt":0.19789833803129547,"score_spread":0.17868531774649216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6926570324","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032782933,0.00004655945,0.000051101426,0.000032422777,0.00001170822,0.000012002938,0.998691,0.000084534106,0.00074291177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009757774,0.00013692299,0.00016322201,0.000024209774,0.000010582945,0.0001346572,0.995199,0.000032074026,0.0033234998],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935764,0.00006840029,0.00009514498,0.00016879886,0.00020634229,0.00010367659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787915,0.00021711057,0.00030604567,0.00022957049,0.0011517303,0.00021639453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006649091,0.0015576829,0.0014807866,0.005677796,0.0006652558,0.0018410648,0.0018132015,0.0007531454,0.040023483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038540636,0.00090941164,0.00069916353,0.012093018,0.00020064818,0.0011865259,0.0010195232,0.0015846202,0.036206923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026261272,0.000022892473,0.002926476,0.00019006972,0.000022318938,0.00001476812,0.000029911505,0.00018228465,0.000021605807,0.0002554757,0.99375546,0.0025526313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022279726,0.000020768244,0.088769965,0.0003869235,0.00006497431,0.00007138939,0.0003603874,0.0009043551,0.00028925747,0.00056040986,0.9082971,0.00005170919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27199435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.333496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27199435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025020943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049366406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5408223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6926609975","doi":"10.25384/sage.24037533","title":"sj-docx-1-psg-10.1177_22925503231195020 - Supplemental material for Current Practices and Trends of Plastic and Oncoplastic Breast Surgeons in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sage Journals Data","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plastic surgery; Current (fluid); Oncoplastic Surgery; Breast surgery; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.0602100853038753,"score_gpt":0.35277141597712436,"score_spread":0.2925613306732491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6926609975","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017265226,0.00006609364,0.00006652403,0.00039498584,0.00013382871,0.00010387761,0.9758326,0.00053561747,0.02269382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058417176,0.000835806,0.0011282112,0.001087997,0.00019878703,0.00066891167,0.8234173,0.0020475704,0.16477373],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773455,0.00007213416,0.00021237551,0.0002350906,0.0011683116,0.0005774677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96625227,0.0039016556,0.0009975,0.0008998943,0.02494625,0.0030024266],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010645924,0.0013747796,0.001556691,0.0072058165,0.0038555174,0.00535645,0.0033303055,0.0014425114,0.8608242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019932194,0.0012902712,0.0009328587,0.018805917,0.001031711,0.0025467833,0.0027952017,0.0016177994,0.53871125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015712829,0.000009637441,0.00042859916,0.00017421608,0.000002667445,0.0000055516125,0.00003942764,0.000022176715,0.000012313749,0.000111868096,0.9952442,0.003933563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021077065,0.000022713399,0.018644284,0.0009553414,0.000023805727,0.000052404655,0.0012505486,0.00018611392,0.00024201111,0.00071744516,0.9776103,0.000084229454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91209173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9180829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8608242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017672595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044812314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19851726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6928994529","doi":"10.4224/physreva.96.042113.data","title":"Quantum simulations of an electron in a two dimensional potential well","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Electron; Quantum; Artificial neural network; Partial differential equation; Computer simulation; Differential equation","score_opus":0.018970847038064474,"score_gpt":0.34487702202908227,"score_spread":0.3259061749910178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6928994529","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40288547,0.0015572261,0.010556533,0.0033287625,0.00041278123,0.00019914052,0.56095093,0.0050515025,0.015057688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34612554,0.0005482061,0.017332109,0.0005806633,0.00011916983,0.00051173527,0.6274261,0.00058655266,0.0067699705],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997843,0.00006337535,0.000013453712,0.00005151554,0.0000505794,0.000036874193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999461,0.00025533568,0.0000310407,0.000093973606,0.00010436201,0.000054221193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005290557,0.00090244703,0.00076176017,0.000802519,0.0006503617,0.00060074276,0.002538555,0.0020312355,0.004467943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018568035,0.00042452343,0.0011575585,0.0012510355,0.00060020824,0.00048853515,0.0006265291,0.0013748215,0.0020645817],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081271096,0.0006989853,0.013509536,0.0012332917,0.00044879148,0.0006186167,0.00023568234,0.554353,0.0027894494,0.018259317,0.39296645,0.014074188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088633574,0.00017812122,0.009265935,0.00014240622,0.00006743359,0.00024032372,0.0001265282,0.8774675,0.004050697,0.024446353,0.08305136,0.0000769031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024295248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052171562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024295248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001290665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010820486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048307657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931021887","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.3740296","title":"Graduation: A Board Game that Teaches the Value of Information","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Graduation (instrument); Frame (networking); Value of information; Association (psychology); Higher education; Complete information","score_opus":0.04353645601581241,"score_gpt":0.25841620209415134,"score_spread":0.21487974607833893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931021887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19716008,0.00045083353,0.05435708,0.004137168,0.0013606446,0.0018988532,0.004089013,0.011127246,0.72541916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4389417,0.0004667796,0.07711858,0.0031679773,0.00015140724,0.0022341078,0.0051252195,0.0012655187,0.47152877],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997613,0.00006363316,0.000009746295,0.000037891972,0.000047931655,0.00007951491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992568,0.00017706766,0.000022486092,0.00002289024,0.00006170195,0.00045897425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057605474,0.0006983485,0.00024615164,0.00037244876,0.0006253166,0.0009344336,0.0009905796,0.0008542898,0.07617431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001527773,0.00013560352,0.00029021868,0.00014922002,0.00038046078,0.0012112096,0.0020544308,0.001011417,0.013858075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019450079,0.0058612563,0.007108829,0.00061097654,0.00003163497,0.0005310585,0.0033010372,0.002248219,0.010445499,0.04326894,0.5521022,0.3725454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044974772,0.0015902845,0.014174733,0.00020999854,0.00002807387,0.00028279287,0.0017407465,0.009499864,0.0051808394,0.017195148,0.9495712,0.00007663167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018450245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00728005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07617431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004726584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065397914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25482845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6939324969","doi":"10.60692/2dgq4-2x226","title":"PROTOCOL: The impact of agricultural mechanisation on women's economic empowerment: A mixed‐methods systematic review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic impact analysis; Agriculture; Systematic review; Mechanization; Agricultural productivity; Impact assessment","score_opus":0.04138062464593982,"score_gpt":0.32700119315886167,"score_spread":0.28562056851292184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6939324969","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042317162,0.0013544972,0.0012023568,0.0012866091,0.0007260761,0.9863675,0.0077309194,0.00016064449,0.0007483077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003966745,0.0005232637,0.0023090392,0.00028392446,0.00003783458,0.9957359,0.0003495021,0.000014127276,0.00034980872],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9236883,0.03565539,0.023993105,0.0041955663,0.009627471,0.0028401876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8672242,0.058947615,0.01836255,0.010873879,0.04042262,0.0041689924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14208205,0.0048172334,0.014099919,0.012889579,0.004543704,0.009382613,0.005394974,0.010451298,0.12759444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21959238,0.0065279184,0.012244475,0.012373413,0.0057116672,0.010124231,0.0070217256,0.009128751,0.017347932],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0076853456,0.0002971671,0.00081897783,0.8337554,0.0019996488,0.00036226277,0.003758445,0.0008585982,0.001389958,0.006433011,0.090065606,0.052575566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.049751982,0.0018231745,0.0046497574,0.674466,0.0060841115,0.0003718637,0.003878349,0.0013992434,0.0024119958,0.015021745,0.23949647,0.0006453355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007938062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0124671245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14208205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01734716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07412206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75141066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6945265375","doi":"10.25318/36280001202300200001-fra","title":"Mesurer la valeur de la contribution des femmes à l’économie canadienne : nouveaux renseignements fondés sur des travaux récents","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Statistics Canada Dissemination","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Order (exchange); State (computer science); Research methodology; Gender relations","score_opus":0.014325366688948573,"score_gpt":0.2812577587528977,"score_spread":0.26693239206394914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6945265375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8719597,0.024434935,0.0042179185,0.022795355,0.00050571974,0.00010523438,0.0051009445,0.0000504882,0.07082971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635993,0.011168532,0.0022622412,0.0010736211,0.0001226701,0.00007472951,0.00085646886,0.000030488998,0.020811867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715424,0.0009224793,0.00012419326,0.00026767654,0.0009219798,0.0006093809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99000645,0.004828417,0.0011003176,0.0004204107,0.0027572063,0.0008872053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005048235,0.0004661186,0.0005353224,0.0036760718,0.0025163982,0.0033431689,0.00059385755,0.0008285405,0.010219342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020518174,0.0002628571,0.0006133243,0.0051750024,0.0013647778,0.0012834875,0.0016363272,0.0013854331,0.0008311792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023807188,0.00006539046,0.76939034,0.0008054755,0.00035916804,0.0002690565,0.03436789,0.0008620612,0.0008340699,0.02079788,0.01079514,0.16121545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008112523,0.00006425192,0.89069986,0.0013101642,0.00016380302,0.00012802733,0.033009656,0.00043157316,0.00080324593,0.0035397636,0.06978276,0.0000586865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6342445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7506545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3657555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00645143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015688142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.735819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6962859855","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/n95gm","title":"American Exceptionalism Revisited: Tax Relief, Poverty Reduction, and the Politics of Child Tax Credits","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Science Framework","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; American exceptionalism; Tax credit; Poverty; Child poverty; Tax reform; Social policy; Cash; Politics","score_opus":0.015397671542790833,"score_gpt":0.3079733992766137,"score_spread":0.2925757277338229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6962859855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33479407,0.011666184,0.0021251305,0.28222004,0.0008300892,0.000010396762,0.000059372924,0.000031614323,0.36826316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833227,0.0013274777,0.0001981649,0.01084183,0.00018799398,0.000006876226,0.0000075168336,0.000009153898,0.0040981267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972349,0.0012885493,0.00003647578,0.00024622973,0.0003905903,0.00080317236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982241,0.0008152897,0.00021424447,0.0000965832,0.00022132607,0.0004284806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033336515,0.00016939218,0.00024173358,0.00093030237,0.015850872,0.005661849,0.0007019607,0.003371275,0.00223736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002928402,0.00014064457,0.00029176145,0.0012394984,0.03114809,0.0034409754,0.004262768,0.0065573095,0.00010155697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008647381,0.000014046128,0.0013505041,0.000010177916,0.000002940199,0.00010320332,0.016773917,0.000087157154,0.00004995362,0.9714289,0.0048303925,0.005340181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021325435,0.000028110866,0.011021608,0.00033164353,0.00001797084,0.00026445586,0.062413782,0.0005251118,0.000332602,0.534332,0.39065802,0.0000533876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09683143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1345337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09683143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01548108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010159616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19253564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6969506175","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6760305","title":"Distribution. Ogilvie Mts, N Yukon, Canada. in Cricetidae","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Bijection, injection and surjection; Domain (mathematical analysis); Injective function","score_opus":0.0295281992326047,"score_gpt":0.2620237907985444,"score_spread":0.23249559156593969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6969506175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013589637,0.016075741,0.001891376,0.001626863,0.0010537634,0.0004231781,0.22193271,0.0020917743,0.74131495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12611535,0.015205035,0.004071659,0.00057760824,0.00019472379,0.00029316824,0.13258378,0.001479371,0.71947926],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955696,0.00001440171,0.000027435406,0.00009221583,0.00015011638,0.0001588231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993006,0.000026935591,0.00007178209,0.00006752911,0.00041325513,0.00011988334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002800606,0.0016005855,0.0010204882,0.00345956,0.0040391325,0.0023536056,0.0022726387,0.0008885442,0.14626329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091025984,0.0005487734,0.000599892,0.009196974,0.0016365687,0.0014801492,0.0016463193,0.0014485844,0.045287386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043938908,0.000038961054,0.012818625,0.0019149141,0.00007003386,0.0006237669,0.0017124701,0.0006389058,0.0016436921,0.009721703,0.62361807,0.34675947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017517434,0.000007595607,0.013395848,0.00018575655,0.000015133928,0.0001055814,0.0006510586,0.00007362304,0.00016412168,0.0004487618,0.9849214,0.000013596222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9164518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95718294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14626329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014775603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0197833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48929942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6976637729","doi":"10.6068/dp14ba82dd09c97","title":"Most Recent Data (2005). Statistics Canada. CANSIM: Health - Disability | Country: Canada | Table: Participation and activity limitation, by age group and sex, household population aged 12 and over | Variable: Participation and activity limitation, 12 to 19 years, Both sexes | Units: # Persons, 2005. Data-Planet™ Statistical Ready Reference by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 075-001-109.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Data Planet","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Official statistics; Summary statistics; Socioeconomic status; Population; Health statistics; Economic statistics; Population statistics; Mental health","score_opus":0.057998463209295976,"score_gpt":0.29773296225555734,"score_spread":0.23973449904626137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6976637729","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000041729334,0.000054089956,0.00002036565,0.00013674055,0.000028097116,0.00001856596,0.99865204,0.000049957147,0.0009983662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00097440946,0.00039966102,0.0005238354,0.0002863461,0.000022857528,0.00018906208,0.9922461,0.00012667934,0.0052309833],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99498004,0.00034025632,0.0006242987,0.0005334194,0.0024418402,0.0010801965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95480716,0.00189147,0.0011301029,0.0011033111,0.03892331,0.0021445767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027874266,0.0023526272,0.0027949824,0.0070848605,0.0035425925,0.004909164,0.005375081,0.0016699918,0.12895913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022635344,0.0018618017,0.0024365564,0.03953257,0.0007090873,0.0024392665,0.002427556,0.0033785084,0.063300274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021311987,0.0000073874207,0.0007349906,0.00027787502,0.00001580123,0.0000051888046,0.000018947232,0.000083828396,0.000006591545,0.00023657575,0.99702436,0.0015671614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021302665,0.000016589463,0.029693851,0.0013019146,0.00009347851,0.00002880526,0.0005363358,0.00037919596,0.00015338685,0.0006384771,0.9668364,0.00010863084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12895913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061476607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15220197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44604605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980781148","doi":"","title":"Cooperação e conflitos nas regiões polares : um cenário para o século XXI","year":2016,"lang":"pt","type":"dissertation","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Chinese Arctic and Antarctic Administration; European Commission; Shaanxi Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Australian Centre for Advanced Photovoltaics; Arctic Institute of North America; Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis)","score_opus":0.031892593116718014,"score_gpt":0.28267508946952696,"score_spread":0.25078249635280897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980781148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8800336,0.017834926,0.010940757,0.0033255774,0.00019754862,0.00019066512,0.0015339591,0.000086498956,0.08585642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9326043,0.014537157,0.013319374,0.00057982997,0.00012225343,0.00021050037,0.0016710246,0.000070699476,0.0368848],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993735,0.00011206634,0.000035259673,0.00019832252,0.00014873885,0.00013216332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831235,0.00041645797,0.00046496588,0.00014330934,0.00048701782,0.00017600003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011640236,0.00041349008,0.0005605537,0.001474857,0.0025131137,0.004581386,0.00084092503,0.0006217859,0.008917493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018348396,0.00032402383,0.000511234,0.0037523215,0.0016003691,0.002695597,0.0026792486,0.0008682126,0.00089472136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005734777,0.00013138853,0.59545565,0.001914894,0.0001395076,0.0024327484,0.066294305,0.0014931161,0.029250145,0.04680948,0.0067350394,0.24877025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013764579,0.0004185154,0.6573093,0.00064579525,0.00007677038,0.0012462436,0.08708945,0.0005610199,0.0038917179,0.007984422,0.24068321,0.000079820886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023249594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04674515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023249594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022206171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022550507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046228528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981601001","doi":"","title":"Essays in environmental economics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The Atrium (University of Guelph)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Fuel tax; Fuel efficiency; Vehicle miles of travel; Gasoline; Range (aeronautics); Social cost; Marginal cost; Tax incentive","score_opus":0.013565083005913732,"score_gpt":0.21436375621148654,"score_spread":0.20079867320557282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981601001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031994772,0.18950653,0.0030958066,0.13077818,0.008509981,0.000029699962,0.00039726988,0.000056125693,0.664427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15280378,0.22423267,0.003026579,0.029065164,0.023928985,0.00013778894,0.0004817657,0.00020548182,0.56611776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993197,0.00022982736,0.000029023447,0.00011156723,0.00023223818,0.00007767544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983442,0.0011075734,0.00007675915,0.00011142729,0.00027118373,0.00008883504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012369014,0.0008799096,0.0006028782,0.0015991848,0.0016129591,0.0032831186,0.000518775,0.0022285825,0.028685912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034080562,0.00025738528,0.0005950848,0.0019047327,0.0037360059,0.0033224027,0.0010820043,0.0028827197,0.0052059074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014936003,0.000040803196,0.00040642472,0.00022268643,0.000015082015,0.000052109404,0.00052686007,0.0006941708,0.00009200887,0.715041,0.25162107,0.031272795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055371042,0.000010832297,0.00063474744,0.00037596762,0.000004164371,0.000042479583,0.000376891,0.00021002415,0.00004028865,0.1768553,0.82143885,0.0000049375467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003562306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039354856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028685912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043391422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023162102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095963895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987144441","doi":"","title":"Senate on Keystone XL Pipeline Veto Override : CSPAN : March 7, 2015 12:03pm-12:14pm EST","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Pipeline (software); Pipeline transport; Keystone species; Oil exploration","score_opus":0.012291371177309445,"score_gpt":0.23335970947611187,"score_spread":0.22106833829880243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987144441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017220197,0.00095794257,0.0002711468,0.021969303,0.0056060706,0.00030750813,0.016029421,0.001401519,0.95173514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048438283,0.0002987472,0.000063774285,0.0049325507,0.00038886134,0.00017947727,0.0016437954,0.0003245181,0.98732436],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896514,0.00009929204,0.00004149067,0.00008857626,0.00045664102,0.0003487984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795365,0.00034493298,0.00008139359,0.00010343767,0.0011533832,0.00036320792],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014931565,0.0006753587,0.00069498597,0.001287517,0.006942355,0.0045358366,0.0010003448,0.006487759,0.53861064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004677183,0.0008575019,0.0005496083,0.001714516,0.0007934062,0.0021519882,0.0027519462,0.0050596553,0.30338332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017080327,0.000010773415,0.000116907344,0.00002025687,0.0000010472672,0.000036089736,0.00004108729,0.000010674609,0.000048131424,0.0007722529,0.99692994,0.0019956876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021535792,0.000017793913,0.0025310689,0.00007539639,0.0000041353173,0.000024559395,0.00025450482,0.00004296936,0.00022191806,0.00031816866,0.99646914,0.000018799727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10478706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2812664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53861064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003831841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00609281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6581159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6988073270","doi":"","title":"Women and the Canadian Welfare State: Challenges and Change","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Government (linguistics); Poverty; Welfare state; Public policy; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.04162944279670974,"score_gpt":0.23734426754544968,"score_spread":0.19571482474873994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6988073270","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13241035,0.018705549,0.0006969762,0.67161894,0.0023742146,0.00009458833,0.0005480417,0.000047029942,0.17350432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8769191,0.01561763,0.00091218064,0.046904508,0.00062762795,0.00008526806,0.00016307026,0.00006267463,0.058707878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916142,0.0015879327,0.00010383545,0.00040310036,0.0014116014,0.004879348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915798,0.0011850084,0.00030065636,0.00012410607,0.0023926953,0.0044176476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008481942,0.00054107915,0.00067877694,0.0031988306,0.048156697,0.019127848,0.003485981,0.0051498786,0.016222274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010048999,0.00037538027,0.0005714611,0.00640627,0.027365409,0.0058815484,0.0077997977,0.0069556194,0.000456065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016959992,0.00020068022,0.023812173,0.0004162542,0.00006211909,0.00070927554,0.16430879,0.0004845856,0.00041662666,0.5440285,0.14066468,0.12472674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036467514,0.00003224551,0.022817787,0.0007083862,0.00004139237,0.00006813392,0.4375299,0.00021482262,0.0001850716,0.022016566,0.5162292,0.000119974786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19877738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19877738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4284177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92930466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990865934","doi":"","title":"Essays on Female Labor Force Participation in Developed Countries","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberian dollar; Limiting; Public life; Research methodology","score_opus":0.04705698068963676,"score_gpt":0.33703600970728226,"score_spread":0.2899790290176455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990865934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16847289,0.17991647,0.00083081436,0.117202476,0.004183368,0.00012505295,0.0020197937,0.000023029499,0.52722603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5812537,0.17917645,0.0004980253,0.009252627,0.0035993515,0.0003039501,0.0010505643,0.00005531633,0.22481005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886465,0.0005680277,0.000051483228,0.000083041195,0.00020160075,0.00023131611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977835,0.0015477199,0.00021990888,0.00006940055,0.00020850875,0.00017101988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019046301,0.0005675829,0.0003759746,0.0027532408,0.0033769335,0.0027374509,0.0004432886,0.00095001643,0.014709854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004392376,0.00018831974,0.00024591564,0.005115309,0.002940392,0.0014162429,0.0021776657,0.00075139414,0.0010404707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018443199,0.00015200695,0.041076023,0.0018361919,0.000047582107,0.0013846371,0.25328094,0.0007010652,0.00047734208,0.17189874,0.35285547,0.17610559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011540503,0.000034504905,0.039057504,0.0017368558,0.000008493016,0.00016187671,0.07983592,0.0000509789,0.000119999444,0.004462498,0.8745071,0.000012687522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027608534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030950256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027608534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003295876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031892224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0548957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991621573","doi":"","title":"Household labor supply: Collective results for certain developed countries","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Munich University)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Developed country; Developing country; Differential (mechanical device); Order (exchange); Aggregate data; Aggregate (composite)","score_opus":0.03055879268742614,"score_gpt":0.24766352631731978,"score_spread":0.21710473362989363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991621573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96788913,0.002916101,0.00043048186,0.0001234445,0.000012193601,0.000015143867,0.005202092,0.000013818873,0.023397624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939138,0.0011351516,0.00022561829,0.00002266488,0.000012561435,0.000023707238,0.003059912,0.0000073064084,0.0015991739],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994444,0.00016346574,0.00005123585,0.00011067261,0.0000756469,0.00015454722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972162,0.0010689698,0.0007607847,0.0002800872,0.0004741598,0.00019963701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011352326,0.0002015371,0.0005238321,0.004931249,0.00064186985,0.0009938177,0.00023801917,0.00022704272,0.0066749295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026291544,0.0001396916,0.00053173664,0.008753589,0.0005940373,0.00072979607,0.0013246041,0.0002564002,0.000659378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022894875,0.000048902966,0.9618622,0.00029918153,0.0003745816,0.00034655607,0.003653575,0.0023633004,0.00019069748,0.0041193785,0.002270946,0.024241729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012341454,0.00007492724,0.9849941,0.00012762874,0.00009491113,0.00017958312,0.006795418,0.00034306597,0.00024919718,0.0007865892,0.006328519,0.000013669881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014220386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019803863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014220386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004442696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031462658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028275251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992273345","doi":"","title":"Labor Supply, Wealth Dynamics, and Marriage Decisions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Hyporeflexia; Proteogenomics; Dysgeusia; Demotion; Diafiltration; Liquation","score_opus":0.011435804534218427,"score_gpt":0.23526864440954867,"score_spread":0.22383283987533026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992273345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98839754,0.00019690343,0.002154166,0.0007428645,0.0000045968795,0.000009364282,0.00043476463,0.000006018049,0.0080538625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805766,0.00018033387,0.00019591585,0.000024037612,0.0000025823526,0.0000055421224,0.00012169414,9.837138e-7,0.0014111532],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981946,0.0000958352,0.0000061939645,0.000021533111,0.00002015837,0.000036888014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999298,0.00044416476,0.00012906753,0.000037422313,0.000015644591,0.00007579142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006733227,0.00009595297,0.00018543037,0.0004152483,0.0004432979,0.0008519101,0.00017228696,0.00032134648,0.005759198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026526256,0.00014926514,0.00015570002,0.00055920274,0.00040380747,0.00073593884,0.0005812105,0.00038551926,0.0002912498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028607246,0.0002890204,0.7428728,0.00004843928,0.00012510101,0.0005045486,0.0023439056,0.07544827,0.0010314409,0.10855836,0.0032884078,0.06520369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005334455,0.000284806,0.6684478,0.00009568662,0.00006863785,0.00029124427,0.003899642,0.15424497,0.00058533996,0.15887885,0.013098902,0.000050841616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004905392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008080266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005759198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006165443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026754124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019266486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000487096","doi":"","title":"FEMALE LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE FRAMEWORK OF KUZNETS CURVE: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Context (archaeology); Error correction model; Quarter (Canadian coin); Time series; Real gross domestic product; Kuznets curve","score_opus":0.06221048870583152,"score_gpt":0.3813446527386908,"score_spread":0.31913416403285927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000487096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99629396,0.00084359315,0.00019217256,0.00015499437,0.00000906166,0.0000041979947,0.00030127185,0.0000060908687,0.0021946179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99920267,0.00033068645,0.000037295336,0.000010583873,0.0000069822227,0.0000015740752,0.00026610558,0.0000019638485,0.00014213372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952185,0.00012375967,0.000035660323,0.00010675365,0.00008690241,0.00012519461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998309,0.0006606576,0.00056507526,0.00010111039,0.00023208166,0.00013206361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000786828,0.00034576375,0.000438036,0.0015258496,0.0002765547,0.000726157,0.00032326014,0.0002967683,0.0023255409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021271869,0.00011170293,0.00045044482,0.0020336292,0.00059811556,0.0005722743,0.00058589526,0.00042933493,0.0003225967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003038943,0.000081286205,0.9719497,0.00009705953,0.00013864209,0.00091686955,0.0010616411,0.0025667863,0.0003193307,0.0030354096,0.00082656526,0.018702894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006938275,0.000086923654,0.99345523,0.000036175432,0.000044226632,0.00021359116,0.0018940244,0.0017589412,0.00014968497,0.00038905724,0.0019549348,0.000010244438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017327921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010227023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017327921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071340735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005886172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034454167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7005479890","doi":"","title":"Rationing ‘Rights’: Supplementary Welfare Benefits and Lone Moms","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SOURCE Sheridan's Institutional Repository (Sheridan College)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationing; Welfare; Social policy; Welfare reform; Social Welfare; Welfare system; Social assistance; Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.01828093698228981,"score_gpt":0.22786822279035038,"score_spread":0.20958728580806057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7005479890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97191215,0.0003082297,0.0003526009,0.004487833,0.000018140163,0.000012961038,0.000021910635,0.0000038182393,0.022882327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974408,0.00011169676,0.0001608803,0.00017414297,0.0000047028284,0.0000041666103,0.0000044741078,0.0000016567767,0.0020973545],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980063,0.0010288268,0.000044415257,0.000117777694,0.00022521343,0.0005774758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976548,0.0010439872,0.0006273114,0.00015684326,0.00017408351,0.0003429286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002415381,0.000115394374,0.00019925131,0.0005481761,0.0045944764,0.0020021314,0.00051192206,0.0007818826,0.0059020035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073032654,0.00014096814,0.0001227174,0.0004458013,0.007513169,0.0019051435,0.0028208888,0.00096285035,0.00012822283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021729057,0.0002298911,0.13370256,0.00012653143,0.00001632968,0.0035214168,0.633785,0.00013671709,0.0024338951,0.12973271,0.004917068,0.09118056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021622081,0.00010929219,0.10160252,0.00033482932,0.000019157547,0.0013736049,0.8110228,0.00032930978,0.0008266066,0.010953658,0.073370256,0.000036276986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05546552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10688624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05546552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003909684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033736404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11028534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009269506","doi":"","title":"The empowerment of women A study of women's participation in training programs in Manitoba","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Training (meteorology); Empowerment; Program evaluation; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.03844316128871851,"score_gpt":0.31105072682439183,"score_spread":0.27260756553567334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009269506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99644595,0.00011134628,0.000026530573,0.0005593527,0.000011989429,0.000034029923,0.000029473173,0.0000012552986,0.002780171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99148995,0.000455257,0.000112496535,0.0005258634,0.000010419933,0.00006668899,0.000041378848,0.0000053397534,0.0072926716],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835205,0.00062472135,0.00003506243,0.00007345046,0.00016592919,0.0007487832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708647,0.0009580763,0.00034206122,0.00004424535,0.00041968632,0.0011493977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002214271,0.0004241479,0.0003879233,0.001648742,0.016495328,0.0034772179,0.0012036293,0.0012090165,0.003672097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037160902,0.0005667828,0.00019667372,0.0028731208,0.0044512735,0.0011525182,0.0032319531,0.0022834027,0.00032198924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000727943,0.00028922883,0.057879116,0.00004215575,0.000006389306,0.0004346616,0.9344961,0.000015300364,0.00082571444,0.00075915386,0.0004918771,0.0046874424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009350666,0.000095461786,0.088207744,0.00005386251,0.0000072571397,0.00005521133,0.9066372,0.000028910452,0.00015795541,0.0000668103,0.0046733995,0.000006932562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5489928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7968039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4510072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009781696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019650796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9073265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010085356","doi":"","title":"Forces of Change : Mapping the Adoption and Enactment of Welfare-To-Work Policies in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Field (mathematics); Public policy; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.03662183253309496,"score_gpt":0.2744501368921793,"score_spread":0.23782830435908434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010085356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836315,0.0007800902,0.00026352523,0.0028947997,0.000024182886,0.00007157237,0.0013533066,0.000013882375,0.010967128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99343526,0.00050516275,0.0003595152,0.00017396992,0.0000036204922,0.000029125078,0.0004334431,0.00001331772,0.0050465544],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968755,0.0003410668,0.00012396144,0.0002810217,0.0007913091,0.0015870922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99432135,0.000969811,0.00089681434,0.00021200313,0.002485088,0.0011149944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021084563,0.000219486,0.0004406191,0.0034841178,0.00872378,0.004399662,0.0019002074,0.0011684084,0.0031770528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008490412,0.00039955464,0.0004548786,0.008335703,0.0031048523,0.0012472721,0.0030429154,0.0016795387,0.0001777765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032377895,0.00015603095,0.7054558,0.00022869387,0.00013907517,0.00044279295,0.18707326,0.0022337008,0.0011455121,0.026656274,0.0077903583,0.06835469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008165645,0.000025119358,0.86107737,0.0001269397,0.000022612692,0.00002679532,0.10900062,0.0011137499,0.0002462997,0.00057609414,0.027734805,0.00004150841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99883777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13264717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13264717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19966394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9624271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018786405","doi":"","title":"Equal Pay Day Canada 2020: Gender Wage Gap","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.029773560509776323,"score_gpt":0.26246080610901557,"score_spread":0.23268724559923926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018786405","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16190128,0.0118497005,0.0008292967,0.5229579,0.0064434875,0.00020063164,0.064976625,0.00039440626,0.23044665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6820838,0.006194123,0.0012946216,0.09814187,0.0016188367,0.00020368266,0.01723057,0.00018829736,0.19304426],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99594045,0.00013547408,0.00006859779,0.0001814646,0.0014109738,0.0022630752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99043185,0.00040112657,0.00029401065,0.00007846504,0.0037369733,0.005057605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002440599,0.00040796513,0.00067236664,0.0020889759,0.006852573,0.0060083927,0.0024721152,0.005645462,0.03366313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061003314,0.0003033821,0.00082964415,0.0035288585,0.0013929914,0.0018839883,0.002774011,0.0053758435,0.0023394923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019051753,0.00020601922,0.0519249,0.0001263934,0.000041369487,0.00021042526,0.0008372849,0.0005582815,0.00012575628,0.06605092,0.81946063,0.06026747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015101893,0.000081387145,0.328999,0.0005308906,0.00006995773,0.00014207565,0.007844214,0.0019456653,0.0003903157,0.013601041,0.64611053,0.00013391115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98683006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06149126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06149126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19534427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4461524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028929820","doi":"","title":"Greatest Hits: Modern diets are making us fat: A Canadian author explains food cravings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Food supply; Perspective (graphical); Consumption (sociology)","score_opus":0.013579812160246873,"score_gpt":0.21510915601418173,"score_spread":0.20152934385393487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028929820","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0142128775,0.03350882,0.0005301547,0.70308924,0.019967347,0.00006963673,0.0014053376,0.00022619717,0.22699039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12402836,0.049949966,0.0016511113,0.123003714,0.004193111,0.00005220103,0.0005258966,0.00039097364,0.6962047],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993716,0.00006990736,0.000015586842,0.00005617879,0.00029648314,0.0001901958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898416,0.00014290569,0.000030512356,0.000017944341,0.0005466361,0.00027781382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087519584,0.000768951,0.0003756219,0.0011714704,0.012075115,0.003548688,0.0010179912,0.0028230734,0.03154305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024468272,0.0003457814,0.00058984937,0.0023810295,0.0032426466,0.001593834,0.001170302,0.0042517153,0.0030112679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021150727,0.000015434483,0.0018715201,0.000043548273,0.000007803739,0.0001240653,0.0030843986,0.00003090769,0.00007435591,0.0037054757,0.96804506,0.022976236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015780157,0.000010744581,0.015783537,0.0002556198,0.000030326448,0.0002403722,0.020461345,0.00007334037,0.000100500074,0.0015041657,0.9614813,0.000042994474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9855488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99580127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03154305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030831497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03466139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22369927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029624508","doi":"","title":"Les mécanismes de résolutions du diabète de type 2 induits par la chirurgie bariatrique","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Knowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Hormonal therapy; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.0177486726517233,"score_gpt":0.22830493396728535,"score_spread":0.21055626131556204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029624508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75307256,0.16837373,0.020286225,0.015794901,0.0019942564,0.0002741032,0.0007424163,0.00030370607,0.039158072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9175605,0.04616277,0.014170487,0.004727759,0.0010751399,0.00028959388,0.00070533546,0.00013517203,0.015173325],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901295,0.0002952576,0.000069825786,0.00021435409,0.00020382326,0.00020391853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873155,0.00048994937,0.00033552691,0.00010087641,0.00018375192,0.00015835889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017007175,0.00060192053,0.00080957456,0.0009256217,0.0008490498,0.002680022,0.00060503423,0.0014089803,0.009263391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002852221,0.00044986143,0.0012377157,0.00068810326,0.0009910067,0.0014289097,0.0010481582,0.0020589787,0.0015447557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010175362,0.0019274597,0.13047108,0.004561329,0.0014044999,0.004802086,0.0021506334,0.001786007,0.33437508,0.02083284,0.009924267,0.47758943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012042739,0.009046663,0.50584304,0.002830511,0.0021093832,0.015783273,0.0059007406,0.008780837,0.22311948,0.030052805,0.19481133,0.00051771477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026650287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035965953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009263391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010660386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010977497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03098917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043239823","doi":"","title":"Second Class Citizenship: An Examination of Women and Minorities, Victims of the American Welfare State","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Welfare; Value (mathematics); Payment; Welfare state; Social Welfare; Social class; Race (biology); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.03844968892891404,"score_gpt":0.3379992949934544,"score_spread":0.29954960606454034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043239823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865978,0.0013064756,0.000032388165,0.003223327,0.00006396835,0.000025744128,0.00004997621,0.0000021410895,0.008698178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912674,0.0024732747,0.000040736104,0.0013234963,0.00011231136,0.00006647618,0.000068295914,0.000007116333,0.004640899],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783295,0.00071222486,0.00006245499,0.00011015611,0.00030319593,0.0009789665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851435,0.00034395556,0.00040012394,0.000054842258,0.00020782658,0.00047891302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023003651,0.00038178582,0.00069057633,0.0038614133,0.012401514,0.003677333,0.001031627,0.0015567177,0.004124133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043100733,0.0003963471,0.00035410232,0.003029793,0.004169013,0.00432982,0.0057321456,0.0018817792,0.00041999988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050387946,0.00022129758,0.1127508,0.00007273372,0.000014507301,0.00071867934,0.8641134,0.000009414754,0.0002194494,0.0041439873,0.0029394787,0.014745894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024836102,0.000048069865,0.057713788,0.00008060659,0.0000047847743,0.0002679419,0.93344826,0.000014342548,0.000039476872,0.00020126937,0.008172992,0.000005966719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053798273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08980962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053798273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026177221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032384081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10697025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7044334301","doi":"","title":"When work empowers : women in Mexico's City's labour force","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Development Research Centre; McGill University","keywords":"Work (physics); Power (physics); Public policy","score_opus":0.01582656808698449,"score_gpt":0.2623694020098538,"score_spread":0.24654283392286933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7044334301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9057524,0.002823306,0.00007762485,0.039397363,0.00020738374,0.000039642357,0.00030052874,0.000008708154,0.051392928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9595598,0.002944665,0.000066838606,0.0020425704,0.000075804535,0.00007175716,0.000099510995,0.000009402164,0.035129655],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956614,0.00011156048,0.0000068182126,0.000022034745,0.00002845689,0.00026497923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953425,0.00012638186,0.00008868363,0.00001002468,0.00003848956,0.0002021754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006613614,0.00014441388,0.0001409422,0.0005910497,0.009288649,0.0026983544,0.00037027188,0.0008521736,0.015580443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014357023,0.00017293725,0.00011239765,0.0007990896,0.0019712425,0.001498777,0.00228491,0.001116144,0.0004708816],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002105081,0.00020418383,0.23700112,0.0002206535,0.000016920083,0.0011282094,0.62086666,0.00005321356,0.00067354937,0.012228241,0.058471262,0.06892542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012995285,0.00003852348,0.14087167,0.00023602949,0.0000084228,0.00008350788,0.7732453,0.000021218357,0.000077369434,0.0005239845,0.08487222,0.0000087274175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21774697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4323589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21774697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041042594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053468277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43295908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071930437","doi":"","title":"What do we learn when we \"count women's work?\"","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Consortium pour la recherche économique en Afrique; International Development Research Centre; United Nations Population Fund; Bill and Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; European Commission; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Set (abstract data type); Focus (optics); Work (physics); Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.017153001134925638,"score_gpt":0.23392286600978346,"score_spread":0.21676986487485783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071930437","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023601013,0.03894981,0.0030614112,0.92713004,0.010805182,0.000034275,0.00030338913,0.00016145193,0.017194286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15612681,0.25164837,0.025278548,0.48046938,0.03696781,0.0010407886,0.0011397469,0.0009833724,0.04634521],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854665,0.009827569,0.00067287136,0.0008760051,0.0019092971,0.0012477466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9377198,0.034073196,0.0026924598,0.0025288423,0.013449807,0.009535873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0347582,0.0012698948,0.0015118322,0.005608462,0.008566366,0.022105733,0.0037595925,0.0055677546,0.021691013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08355006,0.00076922774,0.0009374392,0.005018123,0.01973855,0.029905954,0.0072080134,0.016388053,0.009897251],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044336088,0.00007770666,0.011069863,0.0012568651,0.000052400148,0.00013440203,0.039521128,0.000089436406,0.00013997113,0.051797662,0.6108173,0.28499898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021798478,0.000060134684,0.010711818,0.011162599,0.000041087605,0.00020011736,0.18593264,0.00015098133,0.00033892778,0.109923765,0.6813517,0.000104483515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034281783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073273845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0347582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077868854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018868688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18382108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7072011969","doi":"","title":"The Taxation of Women in Canada: A Research Report","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Commission; Double taxation; Tax reform; Direct tax; State income tax; International taxation; Tax credit","score_opus":0.016059884854618227,"score_gpt":0.23101285495395515,"score_spread":0.21495297009933692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7072011969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8090789,0.026227674,0.00033203606,0.022329157,0.0003139319,0.00048906525,0.009909722,0.00004532538,0.1312741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88828367,0.040328287,0.0008836006,0.0023930855,0.000063178966,0.00015064297,0.0031961575,0.000035502293,0.06466586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979978,0.00013357116,0.00006848914,0.00011733319,0.0010118323,0.0006709255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956251,0.0003328049,0.00026873875,0.00006182836,0.0028837826,0.00082784944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018776272,0.0002912248,0.00034766915,0.00417405,0.013999953,0.0043686866,0.0009244547,0.0005913393,0.0048053837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004201404,0.00038259453,0.0003538317,0.014465823,0.00173499,0.0012110024,0.0012489781,0.0011375389,0.0004218284],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019678126,0.00050965097,0.46976364,0.0010197046,0.000080916136,0.0011880882,0.1497644,0.0006376899,0.0010081717,0.026509592,0.13397138,0.21534994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000135167775,0.000064037136,0.54853964,0.0005893226,0.00006738033,0.0002021436,0.1900151,0.00034840588,0.00068540085,0.000601511,0.25880757,0.000065971675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99842924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14401133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14401133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27514485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7083882188","doi":"","title":"1/9: Guide Live - outdoor skating, Calpurnia at HOB, jewelry show, the King's bday","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Internet Archive (Internet Archive)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thursday; Blues; Happening; Shot (pellet); Launched; The arts","score_opus":0.016225694434933505,"score_gpt":0.269771674393433,"score_spread":0.25354597995849953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7083882188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00082075305,0.00018182417,0.00036249982,0.00057960016,0.00033651243,0.000109325454,0.0020038967,0.0015481379,0.99405754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010898426,0.00011943257,0.00026092865,0.00023023513,0.000028524904,0.000036388283,0.0006272105,0.00037669038,0.9972307],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998548,0.000012541374,0.0000031181974,0.000018327642,0.000053824497,0.00005729867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995426,0.000023764567,0.000010638282,0.0000200886,0.00015962636,0.00024329415],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023132199,0.00080454536,0.0003381401,0.0006147525,0.0032640796,0.0021541181,0.00090418087,0.0013610098,0.77801824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057496864,0.00043199747,0.00026850152,0.0004381153,0.00030181158,0.0016360118,0.0018052729,0.0014825651,0.6273511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012655882,0.00003391544,0.000095467534,0.000020639745,4.470293e-7,0.000031598167,0.00010379084,0.00000979635,0.00009354534,0.00027630007,0.9836013,0.01572057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042648185,0.000008983701,0.0005630346,0.000022477736,5.8928657e-7,0.000027448656,0.00021578762,0.000022915692,0.000082170445,0.00005605269,0.9989931,0.0000031016539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045787223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26618493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22198176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013810786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015595128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095124116","doi":"","title":"The Identification of Fixed Costs from Consumer Behaviour","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Subsistence agriculture; Fixed cost; Consumer expenditure; Identification (biology); Class (philosophy); Consumer Expenditure Survey","score_opus":0.020185710798444927,"score_gpt":0.29449139948192665,"score_spread":0.2743056886834817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095124116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6655242,0.001876436,0.24953799,0.0024115664,0.00009259143,0.0007367716,0.004638136,0.00028544263,0.074896894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753255,0.00065675774,0.01406581,0.00008294263,0.000025946454,0.0002028912,0.0011915404,0.00002808409,0.008420505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979182,0.0007450608,0.00010522057,0.0003178971,0.0005610643,0.00035268703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99420834,0.0031953969,0.0010647951,0.00080823345,0.00055317266,0.00017009067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024928818,0.0009013536,0.0009863996,0.0021603105,0.00061306625,0.0025943248,0.0015002849,0.0011923579,0.0064031873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015821451,0.00053393585,0.001390732,0.0037626422,0.0022288084,0.0026170176,0.0015633292,0.0017023991,0.0003347627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018281052,0.00021492112,0.12191162,0.0003487345,0.00030814536,0.0004364158,0.001114783,0.21406406,0.0004250474,0.5441396,0.0036475023,0.11320633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055640437,0.00011483944,0.2922264,0.0002015341,0.00020375868,0.0003714974,0.001013628,0.328855,0.00051741756,0.35916469,0.017134545,0.0001410725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14935462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08664439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14935462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007611907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024201286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2969706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095162183","doi":"","title":"Boy-Girl Differences in Parental Time Investments: Evidence from Three Countries,” NBER Working Paper No","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Test (biology); Reading (process); Correlation; Time preference; Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.03701381967943508,"score_gpt":0.26028130690662005,"score_spread":0.22326748722718498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095162183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98058665,0.0030249779,0.0002470084,0.0005617968,0.00002479084,0.000012873564,0.011039829,0.00001002533,0.0044920603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817608,0.0020541665,0.00026069337,0.00012794099,0.000016001923,0.00002357983,0.01367803,0.00001645968,0.0020622867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890625,0.00026229845,0.00009084776,0.00021867357,0.00021558929,0.00030639957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99257904,0.0014650903,0.003853757,0.0005118088,0.000981928,0.0006083899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019690336,0.00033010426,0.00054375257,0.0013013608,0.0012109338,0.0012824397,0.00091728417,0.0004350859,0.0039916565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033529021,0.00038924118,0.0007274467,0.0048340806,0.00071974454,0.0006549949,0.0013070176,0.0006903204,0.00055000634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021027816,0.0000314372,0.9900221,0.00006051998,0.00032563703,0.00016168777,0.0009571425,0.00024304085,0.00012086434,0.00067052885,0.002425657,0.0047710645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000145375325,0.000018517925,0.9965167,0.000032852353,0.000087394896,0.000032690583,0.0008891012,0.00005598113,0.00017600191,0.00003814976,0.002132912,0.000005085999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4257001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57901067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4257001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012297725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014051307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8464445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095211839","doi":"","title":"women’s quality of life in Canada and four comparison nations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Quality of life (healthcare); Social Welfare; Social policy; Developed country; Welfare state; Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.059538909348577106,"score_gpt":0.31358955487322765,"score_spread":0.25405064552465056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095211839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99551743,0.0005085274,0.000024655,0.00014221121,0.0000119711085,0.000021484037,0.0008716396,0.0000030008196,0.0028990358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967932,0.0005610467,0.000103658575,0.000054680208,0.0000031650898,0.000018765837,0.0012422639,0.000003215371,0.0012198238],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882406,0.00009389311,0.00004402504,0.00010386174,0.00023876049,0.0006954396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998577,0.000085705724,0.00014447905,0.000037490583,0.0006089691,0.00054622424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094607554,0.000463729,0.00062659476,0.0040434757,0.0070278365,0.0019985256,0.00075034756,0.0004683926,0.0013900654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018090482,0.00027080686,0.0007049644,0.008367478,0.0015488998,0.0004522555,0.00181443,0.0007255431,0.00014146624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006721927,0.0001583996,0.95410895,0.00009922883,0.00013326963,0.0007162613,0.018761085,0.0004316073,0.00040921688,0.0025781693,0.0025272386,0.019404257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002504191,0.00009552814,0.96984595,0.00005249398,0.000032757634,0.00018285298,0.024957003,0.00029932096,0.00014963701,0.000154295,0.0041682306,0.000036789716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051968094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051968094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023433952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37705672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095840740","doi":"","title":"2001 and of a chapter of the dissertation, The Intimate Negotiations of Gendered Citizenship in a Global Context: Welfare Reform in the Netherlands and the United States.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Negotiation; Welfare reform; Permission; Welfare","score_opus":0.02438859881549885,"score_gpt":0.27609510088791495,"score_spread":0.25170650207241607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095840740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017898666,0.15674287,0.00577078,0.16901758,0.056109153,0.00021616022,0.002647905,0.00012054426,0.5914762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10385901,0.0827097,0.0033017637,0.017165931,0.009911154,0.0002252392,0.0018235289,0.00033827894,0.78066534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996712,0.00011423702,0.000022709504,0.000060963375,0.000096712705,0.000034070792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999326,0.00037429624,0.000065976485,0.000045509296,0.00011943312,0.00006878865],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066651654,0.00042147667,0.00025996548,0.001005377,0.0019513866,0.0026883779,0.000381164,0.0014270867,0.03478742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002802395,0.00015551633,0.00032035966,0.0018244018,0.0011260225,0.0019673542,0.00083467184,0.0018880788,0.0041224314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044344484,0.00007418956,0.0008317482,0.0006076107,0.000012385638,0.00017458915,0.008563158,0.00018044584,0.00065218704,0.11554849,0.7889956,0.08431519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030884385,0.0000078590265,0.0011006262,0.00035451495,0.0000039460206,0.000048749596,0.0015618352,0.00003995542,0.00020203121,0.00537264,0.9912999,0.000004763378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004779455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016746705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9652126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019577658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001970479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116375506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096282965","doi":"","title":"TITLE Single Parents &amp;apos; Attitudes toward and Use of Government and Community Assistance: A Needs Assessment To Plan Interventions That Preserve Family Function and Lower the","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Welfare; Single mothers; Psychological intervention; Quarter (Canadian coin); Needs assessment; Social Welfare; Welfare reform","score_opus":0.24610049582822435,"score_gpt":0.3712559971997075,"score_spread":0.12515550137148312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096282965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99818736,0.00005646393,0.00005936225,0.0003711047,0.0000070184265,0.000058598413,0.0001463943,0.0000022118436,0.0011114866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971697,0.00019740248,0.00036434788,0.00012141334,0.0000064810893,0.00018457457,0.00016556395,0.0000013935448,0.0017891193],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959165,0.00016184374,0.000036475405,0.000031434647,0.00008780807,0.00009074906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773216,0.00048461714,0.00060901995,0.000046472665,0.0005057677,0.00062201684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012173285,0.00011074088,0.00013371333,0.0005951489,0.0013736986,0.000428325,0.0002459602,0.0002773027,0.005162684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031659007,0.00020610663,0.0001388474,0.00026869358,0.00024881228,0.00047443056,0.00054931524,0.00039262747,0.00037382342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011429442,0.00044847315,0.92080384,0.00011468836,0.000015745914,0.0005807923,0.026323948,0.000086904096,0.0007847182,0.000103476916,0.0041643274,0.046458725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021834514,0.0008264164,0.87248826,0.00016069946,0.00001593368,0.00046582092,0.11954689,0.00025977058,0.0006897715,0.000075166136,0.00543811,0.000011354862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011346305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030858757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011346305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009448112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015614979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022560537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096319431","doi":"","title":"The Household Revolution: Childcare, Housework, and Female Labor Force Participation,” Cahiers de recherche 2013-07, Universite de Montreal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Wage; Production (economics); Work (physics); Relative price; Construct (python library); Total fertility rate; Population","score_opus":0.05894718493339093,"score_gpt":0.2985779036635278,"score_spread":0.2396307187301369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096319431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7890434,0.072191685,0.002043119,0.08781624,0.00030236246,0.000053758173,0.002937897,0.000026556623,0.045584925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644485,0.021331234,0.00042086482,0.0008845023,0.00025360103,0.0000323714,0.00038918416,0.000010436196,0.012229248],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994286,0.0003134333,0.000010332991,0.000055387824,0.000059504237,0.00013272346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984937,0.0007981585,0.00036668734,0.00004702249,0.000079547186,0.00021485402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016602182,0.0003139461,0.00031371752,0.0005243776,0.0008440515,0.0016549983,0.00052497454,0.00072854734,0.007874389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00261708,0.00017296923,0.00038247235,0.001117749,0.0012085296,0.0006604364,0.000674319,0.00064156955,0.00026352584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032030282,0.00035510323,0.644076,0.0002939174,0.00032662362,0.0008595056,0.009160089,0.006586427,0.0005762169,0.1748121,0.058000453,0.104633294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060950886,0.000107605694,0.8839426,0.00044026852,0.00012407848,0.00015877692,0.007185764,0.0058537717,0.0002539102,0.020030087,0.08180706,0.000035110337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37832138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4475874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37832138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047972975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033717873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75223863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096373819","doi":"","title":"© notice, is given to the source. Maternity Leave and Children’s Cognitive and Behavioral Development","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Developing country; Subject (documents); Maternity leave; Developed country; Cognitive development","score_opus":0.04143955874333002,"score_gpt":0.28200588920340974,"score_spread":0.24056633046007972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096373819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007682763,0.0020793579,0.0010818744,0.026202556,0.0071033887,0.00019986171,0.23837575,0.0019722406,0.71530217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024056945,0.0029324826,0.0010894543,0.0008684789,0.0007088734,0.00015435944,0.05687111,0.0011519496,0.9121664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996427,0.000035169487,0.000024323164,0.000052324678,0.00017771014,0.000067838366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976368,0.0005178581,0.00014175435,0.00028829355,0.001094464,0.00032076103],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000837973,0.00031759962,0.00037091292,0.0019446977,0.0010644621,0.0018771027,0.0006240588,0.00074396795,0.5539553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053652753,0.000257141,0.00041035144,0.0027193308,0.00024091675,0.0011138715,0.0010311936,0.0011019082,0.24715532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004068532,0.000017032326,0.001900213,0.00007745201,0.000004277255,0.000034270404,0.00018038039,0.000024859195,0.000164912,0.0029173926,0.9625226,0.03211587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016154287,0.000011943638,0.018842705,0.00009178694,0.0000035831015,0.000040961477,0.0003321229,0.00005254454,0.00020963745,0.00047756353,0.97991234,0.000008624316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08022808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08766232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5539553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017206316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025090636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63622856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096523287","doi":"","title":"SOCIAL RESEARCH AND DEMONSTRATION","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Disadvantaged; Corporation; Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Research program; Social research","score_opus":0.11978732648632442,"score_gpt":0.40731839506586515,"score_spread":0.2875310685795407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096523287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017381309,0.0022718285,0.0042713946,0.04425373,0.0012981966,0.0019860857,0.0020097499,0.00026522434,0.92626244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3780851,0.0046973787,0.01371399,0.013551113,0.0005560517,0.0035932378,0.0023349524,0.00021880722,0.58324933],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98560405,0.0060008406,0.00039941937,0.00093111617,0.0049072504,0.0021572835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97886705,0.00550957,0.000516469,0.0033068894,0.007980445,0.0038195988],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019544356,0.000460465,0.0004863446,0.0018348747,0.012814264,0.004385656,0.0012700417,0.0015883747,0.03797533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025955833,0.00034224565,0.00027292556,0.0032520755,0.008368277,0.0019941716,0.005625747,0.002909593,0.0031564718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096720665,0.00029799037,0.002226908,0.00029593759,0.000012353484,0.00015412143,0.009233744,0.00037085873,0.0005062917,0.37762994,0.48218617,0.12698892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003414493,0.00007802157,0.0037755638,0.000135491,0.0000033584306,0.000037196656,0.005063854,0.00012490794,0.00018883319,0.0063224784,0.9842238,0.0000123556165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45815003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.569799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9620247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020094898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08259146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9109666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096534166","doi":"","title":"Medicaid and Mothers ’ Employment and Wages","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicaid; Welfare; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Health insurance; Government (linguistics); Welfare reform","score_opus":0.017737285971960434,"score_gpt":0.2849480683103513,"score_spread":0.26721078233839085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096534166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97518516,0.0015876823,0.000045833236,0.0112499455,0.000063055326,0.000002757271,0.00015865841,0.0000034110574,0.011703531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971777,0.00056383474,0.000021060689,0.00022651855,0.000029490486,0.0000034837888,0.000051365707,0.0000015399771,0.0019249826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954444,0.00012794539,0.000015823309,0.000026053442,0.0000890515,0.00019670343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828774,0.0004671788,0.0006377124,0.000034196237,0.00011048855,0.00046264136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007690027,0.000058876067,0.00012697157,0.0005432659,0.0008289618,0.0009755907,0.00029289938,0.00051103794,0.009431495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004598947,0.00011280974,0.00016197351,0.0004263714,0.00037977606,0.0005550415,0.00070326263,0.0006078569,0.00036984307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016062128,0.00032227926,0.9477986,0.00002082998,0.000039358558,0.0003564873,0.0037741645,0.00010878797,0.000110471425,0.008127064,0.006775348,0.032405943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019420328,0.00005653646,0.9805925,0.00009627325,0.000014405617,0.00018810725,0.00644804,0.00022581784,0.00008636613,0.0025440208,0.009720464,0.000008059184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01427184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021270003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01427184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013107418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007136933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03155142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096740045","doi":"","title":"2008. Do child tax benefits affect the wellbeing of children? Evidence from Canadian child benefit expansions, NBER working paper 14624","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Data collection; Research methodology; Developing country; Research design","score_opus":0.018529832156622746,"score_gpt":0.24921392674358683,"score_spread":0.2306840945869641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096740045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6051007,0.15639757,0.0004907655,0.06244211,0.0005655257,0.00021109352,0.12630975,0.000050282666,0.048432253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9052586,0.058533702,0.0004440903,0.0026911483,0.00015490889,0.000121993005,0.020583946,0.000026415215,0.012185285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981547,0.00034398306,0.000108932996,0.00015952227,0.00066923484,0.00056376663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834236,0.004496665,0.0043996223,0.00056637917,0.005186613,0.0019270709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003900567,0.00055619434,0.00085147505,0.0022848295,0.0030200277,0.0022876118,0.0022892882,0.0011695315,0.011367114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017980745,0.0005475529,0.0008942722,0.005996136,0.0014178237,0.0011863466,0.0017470755,0.002159666,0.0006784394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060438,0.00012803702,0.8636,0.0005432408,0.00083113747,0.00033417498,0.0024953655,0.0007783406,0.00005224089,0.0074322824,0.085277155,0.037923627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005545551,0.000025231306,0.97987694,0.00039299476,0.0004649084,0.00002998544,0.002125077,0.00012773933,0.00005330872,0.00043408453,0.01639344,0.000020778234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98935854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99441236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019578421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019578421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030296303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14205205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096748761","doi":"","title":"TITLE: cOm:;e Essays on Empirical Household Behayiour","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; British Household Panel Survey; Labour supply; Panel data; Test (biology); Instrumental variable; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Empirical research","score_opus":0.0686785126795095,"score_gpt":0.3235817980830551,"score_spread":0.25490328540354557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096748761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023278479,0.14761238,0.033912245,0.3384613,0.021677028,0.00011457303,0.0037282393,0.0002584871,0.4309572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3222471,0.217148,0.017730178,0.043794252,0.043319814,0.00051861024,0.0036003115,0.0005485781,0.35109323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787724,0.0009272988,0.00010870577,0.00037222868,0.0006100805,0.00010438481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9620058,0.03124839,0.0012007086,0.0019419015,0.00322281,0.0003803061],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045409035,0.00059234345,0.0007016767,0.0026114786,0.0013653316,0.0027603551,0.0009264382,0.001669742,0.017186822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024294103,0.0003931344,0.0005044828,0.004056177,0.004234683,0.004801686,0.0016905898,0.0032284511,0.0046577817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006874168,0.00018672612,0.005479998,0.00060225965,0.00006651588,0.000107120424,0.0027058674,0.0012195508,0.0002061178,0.39135805,0.4459299,0.15206923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022664226,0.000042205516,0.014100824,0.0017249618,0.000020920701,0.00009983326,0.002065836,0.0015808048,0.00026004855,0.18684375,0.7931957,0.000042461965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023743901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002137615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9828132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024400998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010086673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057495654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096759568","doi":"","title":"The Intertemporal Substitution and Income Effects of a VAT Rate Increase:","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Substitution (logic); Substitution effect; Consumption (sociology); Tax rate; Durable good; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.017542688339081517,"score_gpt":0.2537757160391721,"score_spread":0.23623302770009058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096759568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99697864,0.00011554591,0.00044554353,0.00007852189,0.000005775736,0.000016540132,0.00008469593,0.000004694503,0.002269975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987392,0.00012022863,0.0004100273,0.000025225889,0.000007639665,0.000011792832,0.00009273525,0.0000028933914,0.00059029576],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947935,0.00023733926,0.000030913325,0.000058007496,0.0000773787,0.00011709972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713457,0.001468425,0.0008316049,0.00020390369,0.00025036323,0.00011112355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010877516,0.0003520447,0.00044998215,0.00046913474,0.00039795277,0.0007347875,0.00035248094,0.0005021938,0.004647185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033391472,0.00013632292,0.0008357992,0.0006445361,0.0005838678,0.00059812213,0.0006864226,0.000614749,0.0002948666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035613587,0.0020820762,0.8824416,0.00030259482,0.00050948834,0.0022596293,0.001054297,0.03291946,0.015589319,0.009871958,0.00085563783,0.048552614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009423293,0.0016252234,0.9481881,0.00003876532,0.00035098853,0.00045260417,0.002427898,0.03100783,0.009406692,0.0034242624,0.0029252085,0.000058095156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006875884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008934796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006875884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009972954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000436666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015546441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096990215","doi":"","title":"Labor Economics, Applied Econometrics, Economics of Education, Labor Market Policy Evaluations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Regression discontinuity design; Labor demand; General equilibrium theory; Discontinuity (linguistics); Labour supply; Secondary labor market","score_opus":0.03504033788112174,"score_gpt":0.3036511990504465,"score_spread":0.26861086116932475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096990215","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17635755,0.07014622,0.44091964,0.07668613,0.001427562,0.0010798791,0.014613366,0.00092414266,0.21784556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86001784,0.038066376,0.04774369,0.002523745,0.0013870798,0.0007264005,0.0043383944,0.00013192264,0.045064487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972064,0.00209231,0.00007430989,0.00014072306,0.00032463355,0.00016160619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891509,0.008747666,0.0007692952,0.00036066357,0.00080026174,0.00017118314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005090785,0.00081461266,0.0011904966,0.0038184952,0.0010289301,0.0030158784,0.0009871513,0.0013863121,0.016223697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021759572,0.00037932233,0.00047871255,0.0072755064,0.001871564,0.0019231819,0.0008274608,0.0015613298,0.00141376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053366766,0.00025217846,0.043972995,0.0005722915,0.00020771401,0.00031516585,0.00034897993,0.20887768,0.0001106855,0.5772394,0.0369057,0.13114391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000821276,0.000080345235,0.025739208,0.00052194245,0.0000772182,0.000107157284,0.0017252353,0.27767104,0.0002368278,0.6208251,0.072853245,0.000080519516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25032243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1680746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25032243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008066932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074511473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4977308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097003401","doi":"","title":"NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES SUBSIDIZING THE STORK: NEW EVIDENCE ON TAX INCENTIVES AND FERTILITY","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Incentive; Fertility; Population; Control (management); Tax incentive; Earned income tax credit; Tax policy","score_opus":0.08301636321954196,"score_gpt":0.29079377570681725,"score_spread":0.20777741248727527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097003401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5063607,0.058261417,0.0149941305,0.11052029,0.0014083425,0.00074474217,0.1544885,0.0005564745,0.15266535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8761659,0.024451895,0.0034058227,0.0055511664,0.0013210664,0.000389815,0.040458262,0.0001974131,0.048058596],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968503,0.0011215532,0.00022276645,0.00039561195,0.0010083487,0.00040142998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93391556,0.036977638,0.01680144,0.004352902,0.006127536,0.0018248218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008856446,0.00039151797,0.0013676527,0.0021911447,0.0014993437,0.0024746163,0.0015327535,0.001537368,0.017772265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033997152,0.00035956042,0.00081672834,0.006021421,0.0014785364,0.0011262681,0.00097413245,0.001672696,0.0018993648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081102725,0.00024859927,0.61952424,0.0008831515,0.001160168,0.0005137833,0.00115598,0.009177058,0.00039068033,0.03263523,0.23116173,0.102338396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006733822,0.00013787676,0.74286443,0.0007038676,0.0012955331,0.00011845866,0.0022183014,0.008362355,0.0015836802,0.01665896,0.22527303,0.000110133864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6638095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67607945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6638095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006037667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007051565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6763408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097060754","doi":"","title":"All views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Setting and Updating Modern Poverty Thresholds","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Percentile; Equivalence (formal languages); Quarter (Canadian coin); Consumption (sociology); Poverty; Value (mathematics); Consumer Expenditure Survey","score_opus":0.05471611392077295,"score_gpt":0.35198680382607683,"score_spread":0.29727068990530386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097060754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14810047,0.004027928,0.014626548,0.04371687,0.0072680213,0.0009568934,0.08588377,0.00058461097,0.69483495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6462673,0.027276414,0.09265228,0.008125743,0.0027272967,0.002030054,0.0568033,0.0013948112,0.16272281],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99085265,0.002782046,0.0005552978,0.0007053225,0.004408629,0.0006960646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96036285,0.012073664,0.004789436,0.004433892,0.017448755,0.0008913609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010671086,0.0007049765,0.0010038222,0.0041961023,0.0009960927,0.0044673895,0.0016051267,0.00065062055,0.04807336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06430483,0.00035924517,0.00044700108,0.009932957,0.0007781947,0.0026860521,0.0017762132,0.0022465505,0.016526898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075412914,0.0005574016,0.14511348,0.0005410256,0.00020087807,0.0002036507,0.0032640034,0.0010846098,0.0017119206,0.056613613,0.48022562,0.30972973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008078861,0.00037753032,0.18666649,0.0025571703,0.0003464373,0.00029817974,0.025797816,0.00519049,0.0058884877,0.019406693,0.7532454,0.0001445079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012616285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020186106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04807336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023109887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042529386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16082138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097076481","doi":"","title":"Why Study the Alberta Welfare Reform................................................................................................... 3 Literature Review....................................................................................................","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Government (linguistics); Poverty; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.028872699505789773,"score_gpt":0.28566306868950586,"score_spread":0.2567903691837161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097076481","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12244914,0.17319198,0.0017124811,0.5433319,0.0034689833,0.0003939668,0.0014875385,0.000104053965,0.15385994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79081345,0.087293096,0.004256695,0.07579681,0.00097426417,0.0004438936,0.0007780552,0.00005967408,0.039584134],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935939,0.0022696622,0.00009605878,0.00028270402,0.0017984085,0.0019593525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98630655,0.004830812,0.00094512914,0.00044199327,0.0059937635,0.0014818184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009810859,0.00031594647,0.00064295816,0.0026076164,0.007067997,0.0062918304,0.0027226626,0.0037015332,0.009052792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02242333,0.00025966132,0.0005256432,0.006206178,0.0062191994,0.003741954,0.0027977177,0.0024070516,0.00063004106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032782077,0.00031555214,0.063275814,0.007542899,0.00023871404,0.0009992941,0.036264792,0.0011480588,0.0009212674,0.24727492,0.29692325,0.34476754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007760745,0.0001450562,0.112229854,0.009240245,0.00018368222,0.00012249486,0.0986022,0.00040385913,0.00068722403,0.020843448,0.757383,0.00008140532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8344362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9361262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16556382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06827349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13795899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49536115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097288277","doi":"","title":"NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES GENDER, OCCUPATION CHOICE AND THE RISK OF DEATH AT WORK","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Population; Center (category theory); Series (stratigraphy)","score_opus":0.032805383493727046,"score_gpt":0.2778259810246678,"score_spread":0.24502059753094077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097288277","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02887548,0.037019514,0.0047451733,0.08533207,0.0053200494,0.00046577174,0.77160436,0.0009366684,0.065700844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1655987,0.085911356,0.0044399397,0.008208435,0.006555141,0.0025451535,0.54894537,0.00086219783,0.17693372],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971511,0.00072272134,0.00033884915,0.0003836757,0.0010542871,0.00034943802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98705286,0.0057110484,0.0029997171,0.000758495,0.0026620158,0.0008157549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007074405,0.001165456,0.0031716619,0.0032263508,0.0009626793,0.0039457874,0.0020052714,0.004640828,0.054698315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02663789,0.0006598281,0.00089087547,0.0096703125,0.00069296453,0.0032531377,0.0010419461,0.002968943,0.024370905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002968825,0.00009705467,0.028586058,0.0005263339,0.0002324174,0.00017364117,0.00009462439,0.0015292042,0.00009943057,0.010162289,0.9359927,0.022209328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001729072,0.00024189257,0.13262735,0.0013322221,0.00078884524,0.00031859998,0.0007934279,0.004421678,0.0011534174,0.022535948,0.8339376,0.000120038545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041916974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040155966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054698315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035990325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00393191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18298411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097403398","doi":"","title":"IZA DP No. 4134 Assessing the Impact of a Wage Subsidy for Single Parents on Social Assistance in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Social assistance; Wage; Public assistance; Duration (music)","score_opus":0.04521769380713139,"score_gpt":0.3427760459780971,"score_spread":0.2975583521709657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097403398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96690047,0.0012244809,0.00033500264,0.005131294,0.00009871561,0.0003332947,0.013055576,0.000038521863,0.012882651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876017,0.0007609068,0.00052398746,0.0004806147,0.000017209568,0.000114217524,0.0024913629,0.000013755514,0.0079963645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611723,0.0006099257,0.00008968615,0.00019421025,0.0010379251,0.0019510346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99187475,0.0012135613,0.0005493291,0.00016818472,0.0037887206,0.0024054777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002566571,0.00043507532,0.0009048993,0.0012571077,0.0031048807,0.0019302645,0.0017840686,0.0009604481,0.005430303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009311856,0.00026313443,0.0008694217,0.002262345,0.00088433374,0.00045137797,0.0015108442,0.0016077315,0.00023775404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002818449,0.001245309,0.8491765,0.0006019033,0.00076962105,0.00064852426,0.0024478284,0.013407021,0.0008555432,0.010478027,0.049400065,0.06815114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024273508,0.00052610843,0.97441953,0.00014201643,0.00028542898,0.000035303514,0.005750558,0.0053023933,0.00041427888,0.00037802884,0.012455776,0.00004777759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10507294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10507294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23178606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7623611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097508868","doi":"","title":"Poverty, Job Quality and Labor Market Dynamics Women’s Economic Resources and Bargaining in Marriage: Does Egyptian Women’s Status Depend on Earnings or Marriage","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Population; Quality (philosophy); Collective bargaining; Public health; Human resources; Public policy; Reproductive health; Health care","score_opus":0.016576328453968076,"score_gpt":0.2856819535069138,"score_spread":0.2691056250529457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097508868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949157,0.00044994894,0.000024064078,0.00056722783,0.000007798453,0.000002750287,0.000047975987,5.067526e-7,0.003984016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992906,0.00015821002,0.000008939604,0.000030490704,0.0000058931514,0.0000014009427,0.000019346611,6.362005e-7,0.0004845825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994758,0.00015206239,0.000022964468,0.000038612416,0.00007016246,0.00024038379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862456,0.00039339715,0.00040005095,0.000045866567,0.00013637253,0.0003997527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011723806,0.00014176278,0.00025652588,0.0011198705,0.0013275981,0.0020097317,0.00040270935,0.00041395705,0.0068920725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036800508,0.0001417025,0.00021145951,0.0014142321,0.0015374859,0.0009889285,0.0012565277,0.00049800676,0.00041105048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020622832,0.00021746599,0.96932185,0.000034169243,0.000065003,0.00018603372,0.009749436,0.00017319605,0.00012757006,0.004186164,0.0007149208,0.015018024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072143857,0.00004916259,0.9762709,0.000052788244,0.000017125121,0.000046996935,0.020988695,0.00020275326,0.000041523173,0.0009766758,0.001339235,0.000006947197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02409983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030436078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02409983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009915304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093998195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047919095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097542586","doi":"","title":"2005a), “Low-fee ($5/day/child) Regulated Childcare Policy and the Labor Supply of Mothers with Young Children: A Natural Experiment from Canada,” Working Paper, Université du Québec à Montréal","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Christian ministry; Social research; Government (linguistics); Natural experiment; Data collection; Data source; Social policy","score_opus":0.002037476390385167,"score_gpt":0.17018708428907764,"score_spread":0.16814960789869246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097542586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6609042,0.01702099,0.0017196771,0.09393418,0.0009421135,0.0010002647,0.16617666,0.00016947987,0.05813242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83297867,0.0069055785,0.004474235,0.00849099,0.00018617105,0.0014401502,0.032439027,0.00011916877,0.11296608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871755,0.00042335424,0.000044806533,0.0001259696,0.00034843868,0.00033985593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98918355,0.002945948,0.001130164,0.0005179086,0.0043865493,0.0018358969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004042754,0.00055494386,0.0008561719,0.001093918,0.0061760093,0.0031403406,0.0023656052,0.0017123577,0.020758152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007985006,0.00066676456,0.0008302084,0.0028598025,0.0012081043,0.0012941911,0.0012111824,0.0015896396,0.0014007798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079498254,0.0007318929,0.5341493,0.00027521548,0.0003335492,0.0004984108,0.012357484,0.00088341924,0.00046319584,0.017120633,0.40005863,0.032333292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023822895,0.00010595691,0.9051921,0.00027753765,0.00016522787,0.000036382422,0.009857263,0.00054579176,0.00032962527,0.0009775239,0.08219776,0.0000765898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99739033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036554374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036554374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07318039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26522177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097584788","doi":"","title":"Improving the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey’s Sampling Procedure October 2009","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sample (material); Sampling frame; Sampling (signal processing); Quarter (Canadian coin); Panel data; Turnover; Current Population Survey","score_opus":0.05034071618857628,"score_gpt":0.3033355696349264,"score_spread":0.25299485344635014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097584788","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13319182,0.0011767212,0.35648906,0.010626632,0.006141778,0.31639493,0.11651658,0.0024072614,0.057055295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09567921,0.0012578984,0.43348628,0.007348044,0.0013205713,0.38658708,0.05024983,0.0007625974,0.023308503],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9506275,0.03312615,0.004745313,0.0023604475,0.0075747916,0.0015657806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680779,0.006663626,0.0018437302,0.0071905763,0.015023525,0.0012007139],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0751396,0.0007651701,0.0011338028,0.002178333,0.0017839846,0.0010934101,0.002627276,0.0012396625,0.01643947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08162413,0.00121789,0.0008376888,0.0024471693,0.0005108967,0.001014729,0.0025405772,0.002440456,0.008212299],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011559216,0.0018269873,0.08761689,0.00084606546,0.00013048548,0.00021662837,0.004173006,0.0023726355,0.0033708797,0.0140977055,0.6318195,0.25237328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009084609,0.0015641716,0.4479705,0.0009229497,0.00009725156,0.00021197599,0.002231819,0.00834729,0.0027609877,0.008163624,0.5266391,0.00018186303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031066518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060620062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9248604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00304686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069691264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39738095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097709057","doi":"","title":"Dalhousie University.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Survey data collection; Poverty; Measuring poverty; Survey methodology","score_opus":0.018323877383896715,"score_gpt":0.2436317368901727,"score_spread":0.225307859506276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097709057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050180196,0.0033353164,0.0015956627,0.003825612,0.0008219311,0.00012510257,0.05707555,0.0012514273,0.9269515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00783113,0.0023203997,0.0026486737,0.00051894994,0.000031244348,0.000075332464,0.01163169,0.0002444872,0.974698],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992131,0.00005887636,0.00006624011,0.00024258088,0.0002950305,0.00012412808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990922,0.0001308158,0.000058450627,0.00019093654,0.0003285618,0.0001989852],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007137933,0.0011020693,0.00089139596,0.0016699941,0.00198813,0.0045198677,0.0011823823,0.0010322856,0.6682343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018229324,0.00080884167,0.0004688956,0.0025569946,0.0007009686,0.0018999757,0.0017325307,0.0013672966,0.3458553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002830779,0.00027093766,0.006787637,0.0005094275,0.000041364907,0.00040879037,0.00045136092,0.00078260334,0.0014992247,0.025993554,0.5534261,0.40954596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018102763,0.00002381311,0.0062938337,0.00010939447,0.000007225683,0.00005939348,0.00024970222,0.00023834503,0.00035300426,0.0009088168,0.9917175,0.000020968952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27709004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.407101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3317657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043963795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008147616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5509544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097739913","doi":"","title":"PRELIMINARY contact","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Welfare; Almost ideal demand system; Position (finance); Tax credit; Sales tax","score_opus":0.018567996347984245,"score_gpt":0.27604523611594506,"score_spread":0.25747723976796083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097739913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006786702,0.00039725428,0.00059443834,0.0028265673,0.0016422614,0.0003472934,0.012084692,0.0011509699,0.98027784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020279773,0.00025282876,0.00033227788,0.0011917759,0.000102156824,0.00011153588,0.0034628243,0.0003955667,0.99212307],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990594,0.0001222624,0.00005308155,0.00020885703,0.0003851083,0.00017119042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969529,0.00038260518,0.000059581653,0.0004332738,0.0015867864,0.0005848287],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010448911,0.00072507345,0.00088529737,0.001456052,0.0031029445,0.004334942,0.0018539407,0.0023326532,0.93532956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060181594,0.0004450084,0.00042545446,0.0016735101,0.0005364137,0.0019888056,0.0029182727,0.001719342,0.824645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042131065,0.000028737826,0.00025978225,0.000121934834,0.0000017834781,0.00007717347,0.00013934945,0.000014394745,0.00018523037,0.002176615,0.95449436,0.042458463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049353444,0.0000057327325,0.00031428604,0.00003342255,7.766427e-7,0.000031452517,0.00015173737,0.000013255466,0.00004064525,0.00029977603,0.99910164,0.0000023722312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01893005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042470284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06467044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021554623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004598899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09224445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097985544","doi":"","title":"Labour Market Outcomes: A Cross-National Study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duration (music); Welfare; Welfare system; Social assistance; Social Welfare; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.033851689594805105,"score_gpt":0.3699177544703988,"score_spread":0.3360660648755937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097985544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977264,0.00008403251,0.000025267544,0.0000668086,0.0000017744628,0.0000112758435,0.0008557178,0.000001264204,0.0012274636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771845,0.00018800113,0.00004347408,0.000039004713,0.0000031343604,0.000026627178,0.0011843153,0.0000028066609,0.00079426816],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921644,0.000119978235,0.000051115243,0.00011808458,0.00020343732,0.0002909895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986125,0.00015270035,0.0004676915,0.00010782251,0.00037764947,0.00028154705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009618748,0.00016596487,0.00039865973,0.0011279891,0.0021239512,0.0009431163,0.00048355048,0.00035229803,0.0017460538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022750618,0.0002675481,0.00034673934,0.003187399,0.00059743214,0.0007349104,0.0013191804,0.000495289,0.00034433595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003516137,0.000040581992,0.9945905,0.000010714208,0.000031621294,0.00007691259,0.003386656,0.000023217186,0.00009169527,0.00005586866,0.00025347422,0.0014035498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012095119,0.000009703694,0.9981365,0.000003621537,0.000004743711,0.000015028873,0.0015092415,0.0000133435215,0.000006268044,0.000005379468,0.00029291314,0.0000019009394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85566086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94696224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85566086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057830177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033499731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29037833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098003674","doi":"","title":"NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES GENDER DIFFERENCES IN COMPETITION: EVIDENCE FROM A MATRILINEAL AND A PATRIARCHAL SOCIETY","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Developing country; Developed country; Data collection; Research methodology","score_opus":0.08031348826299024,"score_gpt":0.2829199729695881,"score_spread":0.20260648470659787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098003674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6911204,0.037747886,0.0032370507,0.0845247,0.0010757613,0.00023301363,0.08703292,0.00014463814,0.09488367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90911895,0.015205795,0.00094469177,0.0034563318,0.0010493604,0.00024568432,0.030851418,0.00011649461,0.039011173],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832374,0.00051302934,0.00016525664,0.00027294172,0.00047769095,0.0002472548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806608,0.0069568437,0.0075119906,0.0008613804,0.0019390554,0.0020698637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004057254,0.00030364253,0.0012786685,0.0020375699,0.001218448,0.0023357305,0.0007054506,0.001053761,0.028244928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013057709,0.00024472183,0.00052138575,0.005680416,0.00085003866,0.0014640444,0.0010423795,0.0013832321,0.003467394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006485195,0.0002083132,0.6584138,0.0004218041,0.00055180746,0.0005577713,0.0021952179,0.0011348742,0.00037851205,0.027921233,0.25759682,0.04997139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025972564,0.00016154561,0.8800424,0.0003172542,0.0003414677,0.0002899898,0.0034575916,0.0011999425,0.00039512623,0.009407563,0.10406002,0.000067454974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06423249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071906455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06423249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015088129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019025465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12771726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098007192","doi":"","title":"CIRPÉE Centre interuniversitaire sur le risque, les politiques économiques et l’emploi Cahier de recherche/Working Paper 02-05 Using a Canadian-American Natural Experiment to Study Relative Efficiencies of Social Welfare Payment Systems1","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Welfare","score_opus":0.12756984737833507,"score_gpt":0.340762438064791,"score_spread":0.21319259068645594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098007192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18028015,0.07113912,0.044449303,0.13289022,0.0032721856,0.0015046577,0.048371598,0.001114852,0.5169779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71643883,0.01692296,0.031386875,0.0043056626,0.00050152635,0.0015324637,0.009209486,0.0004011205,0.2193011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909486,0.0038227246,0.00020159245,0.00094906456,0.003064145,0.0010137957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734064,0.012232676,0.0018815711,0.0026785806,0.007050205,0.002750611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015118078,0.00079676864,0.0016510095,0.0020572315,0.0034441003,0.0060796253,0.002039144,0.0019596089,0.052222785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024080478,0.00051375985,0.0010932399,0.0034528098,0.0023874738,0.0021970784,0.0027492621,0.0030242067,0.0047167167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011915963,0.00061195705,0.07012799,0.0015046068,0.000440579,0.00032191898,0.007963123,0.004295808,0.0019868396,0.36066204,0.26846644,0.28242722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003069631,0.0003520182,0.2215311,0.0014885827,0.00019271519,0.00016254671,0.0037242617,0.0033679642,0.0017709223,0.030092819,0.7367994,0.00021072976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.786723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.752605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21327698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027699921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05085216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.429066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098033012","doi":"","title":"THE INFLUENCE OF INSTRUCTOR GENDER ON COLLEGE ACHIEVEMENT","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Karel; Paid work; Social research; Research council; Data collection","score_opus":0.021002197550981237,"score_gpt":0.2868037244925228,"score_spread":0.2658015269415415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098033012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8401275,0.003373017,0.00069555314,0.034997735,0.00077682966,0.000051218078,0.0018647796,0.000041610583,0.11807166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96456736,0.0007162311,0.00024880964,0.0005609916,0.00015376491,0.000034413566,0.0002072269,0.00002327597,0.03348804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983829,0.00079806923,0.00003500424,0.00012617875,0.0004093556,0.0002485369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98657984,0.004814501,0.0020078842,0.0003656165,0.0021545398,0.0040777107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011849869,0.00019853751,0.00026792512,0.0008074936,0.0015810113,0.0013746965,0.00063252257,0.00041387515,0.061638404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014027981,0.00013600702,0.00018147052,0.0008989041,0.0003492306,0.0011386995,0.0015138194,0.00097179966,0.0033275844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004980155,0.0006220855,0.7501063,0.0000937943,0.00005769358,0.0002758826,0.007342402,0.00011805148,0.0005071429,0.006560752,0.06427636,0.16954151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020366942,0.000103906226,0.9402791,0.00013291836,0.000031730073,0.000105339896,0.010883294,0.00021075385,0.00026705096,0.001715255,0.04623072,0.000019548106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012387062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041250113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061638404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010093229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001518383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20620102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099198264","doi":"","title":"and","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Child care; Work (physics); Paid work; Quality (philosophy); Social policy; Parental leave; Child support","score_opus":0.02391935068860523,"score_gpt":0.2866439473845777,"score_spread":0.2627245966959725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099198264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063187634,0.0071757035,0.0042748125,0.065428995,0.017460538,0.0006589007,0.026271168,0.00082911894,0.8715821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02828438,0.0035264445,0.0038797124,0.010464332,0.001884114,0.00052773644,0.013045812,0.00030052976,0.9380869],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955397,0.0009161099,0.00033043206,0.0010885758,0.0014406042,0.0006845203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99202263,0.0008429072,0.00033471643,0.0012926986,0.0041458216,0.001361318],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005212725,0.0007215318,0.000607883,0.0023678557,0.0031356956,0.0051517305,0.0015325637,0.0024375361,0.38256365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0114765195,0.0003105969,0.0006836851,0.0027582939,0.0008254436,0.0031525854,0.0034226486,0.0024981971,0.21548097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000141188,0.00012460045,0.004616093,0.00025216345,0.000018748598,0.000097871394,0.00092202285,0.000058184647,0.00036981894,0.04620859,0.7223031,0.22488768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012753577,0.000031743268,0.0031114921,0.00012917104,0.0000048457464,0.00005498042,0.00048093114,0.000043162323,0.00011685245,0.003640554,0.9923659,0.0000076111655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007939316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013227894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61743635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023486386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004892632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099220070","doi":"","title":"Working Paper Series Distributional Impacts of the Self-Sufficiency Project","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Quantile; Welfare; Distribution (mathematics); Series (stratigraphy); Observational study; Counterfactual thinking; Impact evaluation","score_opus":0.01829724881845869,"score_gpt":0.276209240115885,"score_spread":0.2579119912974263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099220070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53034264,0.0051428084,0.004844881,0.035415668,0.0006680651,0.0006546446,0.038663004,0.00028039244,0.38398787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9590864,0.0014753384,0.001231457,0.0017155355,0.0001971443,0.00030071838,0.0069011385,0.000054444263,0.029037893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963193,0.001273565,0.00010132218,0.00024861074,0.0013492781,0.0007079755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890604,0.0041436087,0.0017212518,0.0010741883,0.0027446519,0.0012559072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050013047,0.00022202672,0.0005605202,0.0010430685,0.0009743344,0.0026466148,0.0007660066,0.0007717513,0.022670342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017431995,0.00013047796,0.00032402104,0.0019830388,0.0012217002,0.00086518924,0.0017081439,0.001192756,0.0011687669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016470522,0.0011939898,0.15050764,0.00060124125,0.00041080214,0.00044786854,0.001784102,0.012436992,0.00085317506,0.23500806,0.37259296,0.22251603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007133294,0.0007328694,0.5198645,0.0005282372,0.00026471334,0.00023828802,0.005214046,0.007107053,0.0028453136,0.07419305,0.3882209,0.00007773582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083362564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.094229855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083362564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007050867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008430941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16575474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099389754","doi":"","title":"The distribution of Cr between basaltic • melt and chromian spinel as an oxygen geobarometer, Canadian Mineralogist 39","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spinel; Sack; Liquidus; Oxygen; Basalt; Equation of state; Distribution (mathematics)","score_opus":0.019975634893885336,"score_gpt":0.27593933163625656,"score_spread":0.25596369674237124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099389754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88163316,0.0018653681,0.07060208,0.00027452272,0.000044631244,0.0002212533,0.010801545,0.0015397333,0.033017725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9636825,0.00062287744,0.025007213,0.00002865202,0.0000049395258,0.00005820886,0.0017770359,0.00014882864,0.008669792],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996613,0.000010382125,0.000007816283,0.0000740548,0.00021454394,0.000031918134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998709,0.00001062002,0.000012071898,0.0000069890516,0.00008882371,0.000010643431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032717356,0.00023167537,0.00025223554,0.0019912526,0.0009849933,0.0007115405,0.0010914812,0.00019851838,0.0018285338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049001194,0.00021762367,0.0002643729,0.0015337017,0.00044299482,0.00040875244,0.00029927204,0.00027323098,0.0003461749],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004023778,0.00010574026,0.2741351,0.00041755408,0.00011565946,0.00023522342,0.0017251058,0.018228207,0.47231883,0.015649026,0.008733992,0.20793322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004070356,0.00009831655,0.69177186,0.000040187013,0.00006084538,0.000276247,0.00054200756,0.086458094,0.1790132,0.0029792173,0.038623635,0.000095634256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7978727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8634381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20212728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069361283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049661994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40663528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099770797","doi":"","title":"2004), “Neutrality Theorem Revisited: An Empirical Examination of Household Public Goods Provision”, presented at the Canadian Economics Association Conference","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unitary state; Public good; Neutrality; Empirical examination; Relevance (law); Wife; Distribution (mathematics); Association (psychology)","score_opus":0.06876943847435284,"score_gpt":0.3107483649943589,"score_spread":0.24197892652000608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099770797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7310554,0.022685373,0.045741305,0.097644955,0.0005578454,0.00042545318,0.002231291,0.00011089114,0.09954757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987428,0.003699406,0.0025240728,0.002534933,0.00018724582,0.00011420767,0.00044681245,0.000024165372,0.0030410306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606895,0.0021064566,0.00018005367,0.00048290254,0.00077596225,0.00038572197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9305225,0.05563943,0.0061125737,0.0020909875,0.004565162,0.0010693003],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018434739,0.0004945778,0.0012423593,0.0032478785,0.0033093889,0.0034373377,0.002303381,0.0023560252,0.012841309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06618191,0.00033693595,0.0010164648,0.0047844704,0.006470383,0.007225009,0.0021823042,0.004450268,0.0006165792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059839315,0.00035439408,0.25863507,0.0006087978,0.0007516112,0.0010637497,0.01647274,0.0029918076,0.00037092608,0.5481638,0.048964754,0.121024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003464952,0.00026943593,0.39715666,0.0007586488,0.00084488787,0.00055127376,0.027517674,0.014608333,0.0008092222,0.4823342,0.074625656,0.0001775201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094720356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063874006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068450873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042547504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18833804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099847469","doi":"","title":"of LaborDo Higher Childcare Subsidies Improve Parental Well-being? Evidence from Québec’s Family Policies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Work (physics); Research center; Citation; Center (category theory); Politics","score_opus":0.020574544682772714,"score_gpt":0.2837619989350757,"score_spread":0.263187454252303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099847469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9386973,0.012945777,0.0002614389,0.01888025,0.00015628838,0.00006758538,0.0069767595,0.000024906702,0.021989629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916339,0.0016724615,0.0001046653,0.0010004912,0.00002166052,0.000031219926,0.0008869044,0.000011481664,0.004637243],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967043,0.0012017393,0.00010548075,0.00037528327,0.00047485242,0.0011382723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98247105,0.005694213,0.0041074078,0.0013510541,0.0032473635,0.00312889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037409058,0.00032929896,0.00085284945,0.0012098829,0.0040400573,0.002401235,0.002434309,0.0015433736,0.019946571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017071366,0.0003503616,0.0014046759,0.0030382294,0.001671304,0.0012452287,0.0012779173,0.0017168116,0.0005540169],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082930527,0.0002953335,0.9433146,0.00015211472,0.0006858241,0.00026329054,0.0038537474,0.0005579654,0.000107514345,0.0060625058,0.013718457,0.030159347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077367185,0.0000619833,0.98885196,0.00037501202,0.00023248448,0.000027017724,0.0035605284,0.00038364844,0.0000579617,0.00043870075,0.0059102136,0.000023146715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9864966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027079213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027079213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029969407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19647431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100166307","doi":"","title":"Household Responses to Individual Shocks: Disability and Labor Supply","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Odds; British Household Panel Survey; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Exploit; Labour supply; Disability insurance; Selection (genetic algorithm); Longitudinal data","score_opus":0.049863285771793726,"score_gpt":0.29498373639042025,"score_spread":0.24512045061862653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100166307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98847896,0.00056158396,0.004458084,0.0017545032,0.00001356106,0.000029739098,0.00069042057,0.000014942397,0.0039983355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902403,0.00013998855,0.00017175096,0.00006865961,0.0000067050337,0.000007730448,0.00011679482,0.0000013640432,0.0004630402],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940646,0.00023026856,0.0000385451,0.00010681423,0.00006385869,0.0001540299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977416,0.0009945822,0.00063901715,0.00024419746,0.00015642385,0.00022419785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011268815,0.00016320338,0.00045765782,0.0006009652,0.00032511243,0.0010243249,0.0003345378,0.0009325356,0.0035705278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060678027,0.0001717434,0.0003345081,0.0011358454,0.0007657935,0.0010039241,0.00084773335,0.00045299396,0.00027178953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018124896,0.00013047429,0.9264765,0.000074649346,0.00023019311,0.000250319,0.0028638723,0.014981139,0.00074097357,0.015697163,0.00097262877,0.037401047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011152007,0.0001091436,0.94370574,0.000047169684,0.000046493915,0.00015555395,0.0043293945,0.0140168555,0.00023826628,0.03515868,0.0021497235,0.00003186265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016020095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010143756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016020095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008077672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031149303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031853676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100168186","doi":"","title":"NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES BOY-GIRL DIFFERENCES IN PARENTAL TIME INVESTMENTS: EVIDENCE FROM THREE COUNTRIES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Series (stratigraphy); Time series; Developing country; Variation (astronomy)","score_opus":0.03546524554969214,"score_gpt":0.2575214651913125,"score_spread":0.2220562196416204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100168186","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17883219,0.024836214,0.0021662426,0.012431129,0.0007200966,0.00032913854,0.7440381,0.00032940359,0.036317486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38429967,0.03159604,0.0026044887,0.0011919186,0.00063264807,0.0009974727,0.5362172,0.00034772925,0.042112827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980451,0.00045237923,0.0003269135,0.00027532788,0.0005995158,0.00030072284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98391694,0.0053583262,0.0063503426,0.000867633,0.0025794455,0.0009273725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040500234,0.0006483371,0.0014905126,0.0037156246,0.0009548627,0.0023123391,0.0013293416,0.0011917832,0.0248661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011579922,0.00049626175,0.0008780909,0.012339999,0.00047118112,0.0012077914,0.001316978,0.0014307697,0.0061747273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009263547,0.00022584606,0.46898285,0.0015654436,0.0010956363,0.0005909393,0.001038661,0.0018557837,0.00028135476,0.005747626,0.46601543,0.05167408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006440635,0.00012421346,0.8383731,0.0009347363,0.0009214581,0.00022772503,0.0019159316,0.00077295,0.0011699825,0.001252213,0.15359807,0.0000655838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13880008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15655684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13880008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015652596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031522706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27598435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100237710","doi":"","title":"Employment Insurance and family response to unemployment: Canadian evidence from","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Government (linguistics); General partnership; Bridge (graph theory); Work (physics); Social insurance; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.035429138692950765,"score_gpt":0.2934588846429413,"score_spread":0.2580297459499905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100237710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8717899,0.07736635,0.00031802504,0.007086611,0.00021395412,0.00039961698,0.019447941,0.000016972708,0.02336059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715336,0.021710398,0.00038986153,0.00087027793,0.000047070786,0.0000979226,0.0031861386,0.000010063515,0.0021546334],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99545115,0.0011494907,0.00046032082,0.0005035001,0.0013489153,0.0010866753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801696,0.004727276,0.0048113717,0.0012711249,0.0070979167,0.0019227671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006173516,0.00061165297,0.0011455002,0.0031208762,0.0050786347,0.0018851345,0.0026356946,0.0010412585,0.008753337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024619795,0.000594512,0.0014212155,0.008600825,0.0016674766,0.000715619,0.0018831528,0.0012968224,0.00038315513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014423059,0.00028040726,0.9141145,0.0024410053,0.0013016392,0.00031634147,0.008854811,0.00020906053,0.00005421472,0.0024230375,0.011440615,0.057122163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020599848,0.000107851054,0.9788219,0.0022425246,0.0009320224,0.00011984976,0.0071194973,0.00022092971,0.000058955025,0.00031848848,0.009791872,0.000060227587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99559253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03420739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03420739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06758202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24819314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100450045","doi":"","title":"Joint Taxation and the Labour Supply of Married Women: Evidence from the Canadian Tax Reform of 1988, Fiscal Studies 28","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Joint (building); Labour supply; Tax reform; Double taxation; Fiscal policy; Work (physics); Tax credit","score_opus":0.03728557618485109,"score_gpt":0.2896692206874294,"score_spread":0.25238364450257833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100450045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96320665,0.0077718706,0.000069684436,0.0072548757,0.000045961628,0.00004934284,0.002759829,0.0000039448396,0.018837893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887855,0.0040596467,0.000049585997,0.00040835017,0.000024539475,0.000012490879,0.00062485464,0.000001922568,0.0060330937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811494,0.00019108097,0.00006696387,0.00010216304,0.0006591711,0.00086562504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926587,0.0015925642,0.0016193397,0.0002857642,0.0026020443,0.0012416724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002475025,0.00016950091,0.00054753484,0.0019408817,0.00493343,0.00213271,0.0010763238,0.0008984768,0.0054560523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013484295,0.00027032627,0.00029730893,0.0066351043,0.0016932971,0.0008706109,0.0014238878,0.0010697825,0.00025160194],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006491653,0.00026380518,0.9163465,0.0002001095,0.00016186779,0.0002629778,0.011487049,0.0005344287,0.00018457962,0.0131392125,0.01022819,0.046542186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045309396,0.00005127372,0.97447634,0.00014338085,0.000101634825,0.000040942803,0.0110268975,0.00015231564,0.00010629097,0.00071632647,0.01312412,0.000015190154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.987631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025990436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025990436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049206927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18857467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100490319","doi":"","title":"acknowledged. Preliminary versions of this paper have been presented in conferences in","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disclaimer; Work (physics); Individualism; Ain't","score_opus":0.054812315731364004,"score_gpt":0.29634398370825915,"score_spread":0.24153166797689515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100490319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019116102,0.010307742,0.025236825,0.27938926,0.13175353,0.0017118169,0.10927341,0.0025546176,0.42065662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1088524,0.0075432183,0.017941756,0.013084381,0.01490184,0.0011607363,0.040132325,0.0019515667,0.7944318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963163,0.001429748,0.00035842432,0.00047720163,0.0011588881,0.0002594624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95898455,0.013090187,0.0011202125,0.0026574882,0.022405399,0.0017421253],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045641614,0.0011854549,0.0016519403,0.0029099304,0.002680259,0.0030779042,0.0017778542,0.0014651832,0.46291962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03349829,0.00045398972,0.0010647938,0.0040549673,0.0006796936,0.003669736,0.002970404,0.0026349614,0.093095645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000257413,0.000050132934,0.000727087,0.0002553099,0.000026191074,0.00028375495,0.0005776777,0.00021613222,0.00039649967,0.007505826,0.96663463,0.023069318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058359572,0.000025631396,0.003994607,0.0001833269,0.000028060518,0.00012164953,0.0013717477,0.00062372803,0.00047332808,0.0070300153,0.9860496,0.000039931743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018368876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03193955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5370804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004526861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023007898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76607996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100510759","doi":"","title":"“Do Higher Childcare Subsidies Improve Parental Well-being? Evidence from Québec’s Family","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Government (linguistics); Production (economics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.017732839275261304,"score_gpt":0.26224260387685305,"score_spread":0.24450976460159174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100510759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94550526,0.01938283,0.00017511507,0.014959742,0.00020080987,0.00009193009,0.0041239113,0.000015191664,0.015545143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99088496,0.0031923545,0.00018845356,0.0023253392,0.00003689096,0.000042332977,0.00072827365,0.000004939958,0.0025964314],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766433,0.0010486952,0.000076217875,0.0002299529,0.00032701978,0.00065375364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99036485,0.0034956082,0.0020148659,0.0005773271,0.0021238697,0.0014234551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035044977,0.00032206814,0.0005750662,0.0006337629,0.0032693788,0.001790645,0.0015249185,0.0015471169,0.009141682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009764985,0.00028308388,0.0012742032,0.0016871121,0.00162137,0.00084884797,0.0008193912,0.0013270786,0.00030231898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016436639,0.0006065093,0.9229525,0.000446997,0.0013170853,0.000314109,0.0031662225,0.0003759319,0.00024372994,0.0025126445,0.014039153,0.05238153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016506507,0.00013791832,0.99089736,0.00052635587,0.00048519042,0.000028156635,0.0019235982,0.00009629325,0.0000782569,0.0002004529,0.005443042,0.000018357254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9795512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020448804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017905217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019988775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12991208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100512772","doi":"","title":"Key Findings from 25 Years of IWPR Research Health, Safety, Violence, and Disaster: How Economic Analysis Improves Outcomes for Women and Families","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Socioeconomic status; Health policy; Social security; Occupational safety and health; Quarter (Canadian coin); Abortion; Social policy; Health equity; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.0249553764334501,"score_gpt":0.31817314616018477,"score_spread":0.2932177697267347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100512772","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028719971,0.15309878,0.0072108563,0.6309644,0.005869512,0.0009530907,0.007557522,0.0001765167,0.16544932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28612456,0.41427302,0.022011532,0.23375091,0.010039011,0.0040187975,0.006622191,0.00062766473,0.022532213],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98053265,0.011259747,0.000861196,0.00096857717,0.004752052,0.0016256932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9143962,0.061361305,0.0033829268,0.0029005331,0.0142213395,0.0037375872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035940655,0.0008049457,0.0010361263,0.0046520797,0.0028079893,0.0095478,0.0019071474,0.0019280253,0.020028725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12348495,0.00058204593,0.0016182184,0.0091571845,0.002927066,0.0065704593,0.00796102,0.006028203,0.002281727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029524576,0.00032226203,0.014218743,0.00817542,0.00044258556,0.00023394517,0.0062533487,0.00060019013,0.00012878531,0.058805205,0.5024085,0.40811577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011937457,0.00023033454,0.041353088,0.03652402,0.00049576117,0.00016738269,0.020284545,0.00047666568,0.00044895243,0.049819473,0.84997106,0.000109394656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019632693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026600558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035940655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010214303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025539413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19007468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100527064","doi":"","title":"Collective female labor supply: theory and application”, Economic Journal","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Work (physics); Hospitality; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.00965330636838462,"score_gpt":0.279614307276895,"score_spread":0.2699610009085104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100527064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11588558,0.06696077,0.20287791,0.090081304,0.0013730888,0.00020701392,0.0020441874,0.00018336315,0.5203869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8831641,0.031078532,0.013801688,0.0011538216,0.0010392072,0.0003405462,0.00047851537,0.000044972894,0.068898626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994178,0.00028110898,0.000020931277,0.00008893998,0.00011825196,0.000072966126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987625,0.0007510804,0.00019528093,0.000065504864,0.00015095292,0.0000747542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015058726,0.00044749156,0.00044688905,0.001735516,0.00074834813,0.0015476738,0.00068995304,0.0013584981,0.02990716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038957517,0.00030047653,0.00043507759,0.0028027561,0.0017748373,0.0023057833,0.0013073301,0.0009931254,0.0018696106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047741734,0.00004519226,0.010507942,0.00027429176,0.000049686932,0.00020491845,0.0012607058,0.008986808,0.000098830096,0.8526728,0.031606317,0.094244696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003145322,0.00007120125,0.019034138,0.00057669135,0.00003416941,0.00025609345,0.0024995063,0.021181671,0.00012107455,0.8095035,0.14666133,0.000029063325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005957366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005497249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02990716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027897458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013315977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100049436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100637673","doi":"","title":"Before the House Committee on Education and Labor","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Earnings; Miller; Working class; Work (physics); Middle class; Falling (accident); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.014765281160753006,"score_gpt":0.29486307758739216,"score_spread":0.2800977964266392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100637673","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083724817,0.027082277,0.0021490618,0.5046964,0.18274225,0.0008259045,0.0022722818,0.0004188743,0.2789757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058275876,0.00699898,0.0014532474,0.06821455,0.02262573,0.0006897867,0.0009417698,0.0002883623,0.89295995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99166274,0.0014603495,0.00060355815,0.0010967972,0.0032493772,0.0019271339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98323745,0.00196503,0.0006467196,0.0012026906,0.010158465,0.0027896352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009122934,0.0013803061,0.0012946079,0.0019013075,0.005405754,0.008865664,0.0020464796,0.012087789,0.11543213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017819505,0.0008284347,0.0010212829,0.002045945,0.0022668282,0.004758774,0.0039415746,0.012919792,0.08463853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000103544335,0.00002005568,0.00015026462,0.0000353763,0.0000019453216,0.00001351345,0.000042997744,0.000018246283,0.00003863331,0.0076610227,0.97940904,0.012598608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020632272,0.0000030701215,0.00031235584,0.000115951894,0.0000016503001,0.000005472436,0.00006956918,0.000009182208,0.000028140057,0.0004972596,0.9989505,0.0000048946376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02914629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041998588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11543213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005244965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021283006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38615894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100848890","doi":"","title":"NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE, OCCUPATIONAL TASKS AND DECLINING IMMIGRANT OUTCOMES: IMPLICATIONS FOR EARNINGS AND INCOME INEQUALITY IN CANADA","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Immigration; Inequality; Economic inequality; Series (stratigraphy); Developed country","score_opus":0.11297674239604034,"score_gpt":0.34472157800142783,"score_spread":0.2317448356053875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100848890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6462259,0.017800666,0.00088058814,0.050660364,0.00064937875,0.00023127961,0.23452169,0.00018122348,0.048848946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88162446,0.010174591,0.00070120266,0.0017960393,0.0001839579,0.00009295633,0.049737584,0.000075025906,0.055614326],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882823,0.00007086582,0.00007063163,0.00012136919,0.00033066122,0.0005782711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932161,0.0005668472,0.000907482,0.00015660419,0.0033866996,0.0017661288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017759207,0.0003869003,0.0010003095,0.0024868655,0.0041150595,0.0039420575,0.0014527293,0.0008772083,0.01437597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054108705,0.00027553723,0.00088535895,0.007086041,0.0009415761,0.00095954485,0.001413441,0.001799956,0.00088399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000318985,0.00013905324,0.81095606,0.0002644332,0.00029235828,0.00031445673,0.0015345925,0.0016189418,0.00015155102,0.010375322,0.14753406,0.02650032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101412785,0.000026885402,0.9599173,0.00026463147,0.00020203761,0.000043885426,0.0047314586,0.0016496493,0.00016586292,0.0012086392,0.031641256,0.000046997713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99809617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99850214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029926738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029926738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.085664675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21713471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7108661447","doi":"10.1111/irel.70015","title":"The Impact of Canada's Working Income Tax Benefit on the Labor Supply of Low‐Income Workers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Receipt; Margin (machine learning); Income tax; State income tax; Tax credit; Exploit; Gross income","score_opus":0.021668546829052587,"score_gpt":0.2662464990108135,"score_spread":0.2445779521817609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7108661447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897418,0.00021608442,0.00010826133,0.00090086367,0.000010157798,0.000024889352,0.0046053454,0.000008554671,0.0043841535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99573034,0.0001469877,0.00009642851,0.00006991753,0.0000046781734,0.000012538272,0.0014231111,0.0000028745737,0.0025132666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989826,0.00014307551,0.000025942823,0.000074625714,0.0003180153,0.00045573452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597543,0.0008681456,0.0007901729,0.000099959114,0.0012524197,0.0010138148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007837994,0.00017606393,0.00034598517,0.0013248854,0.002292749,0.0013460354,0.00079114916,0.00031108735,0.0045036767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044863736,0.00014262892,0.0003731994,0.0021317555,0.0007024308,0.00025063058,0.0007706893,0.0008206853,0.00030177302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016327115,0.000115644936,0.98174125,0.000028415543,0.00006379774,0.00009100982,0.00070514943,0.0015008817,0.00020611731,0.00093798805,0.00270277,0.01174378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008552752,0.000028586086,0.99463934,0.000024582494,0.00002063305,0.000011342891,0.0018725316,0.0012560006,0.000104586994,0.0001140243,0.0019126935,0.0000071315835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99283606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021272609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021272609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029375616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15434426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112772095","doi":"","title":"The effect of an unconditional government income transfer on the labour supply of lowincome workers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Receipt; Margin (machine learning); Government (linguistics); Labour supply; Income tax; Exploit","score_opus":0.006731148092702458,"score_gpt":0.24022352994911597,"score_spread":0.23349238185641352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112772095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954667,0.00006565065,0.00019929324,0.00034101086,0.000004134495,0.000025237163,0.0017320057,0.000009929003,0.0021559899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597114,0.000078136945,0.0001757761,0.000047736736,0.000004446463,0.00002464611,0.0012006315,0.0000030239305,0.0024945477],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987105,0.0002510243,0.00004198294,0.000116684256,0.00033401776,0.00054565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99622524,0.0013412598,0.001055289,0.000178194,0.00053921406,0.00066078955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009920128,0.00017875948,0.0004016192,0.00082971255,0.0012418873,0.0011438156,0.00085729396,0.0004555299,0.004269331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006718113,0.00017110935,0.00044897423,0.0015952984,0.0008737351,0.000335827,0.0010386063,0.0010548724,0.0005229476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038900963,0.00029776382,0.97052854,0.00004598003,0.00009470611,0.00014359738,0.0011497387,0.004898266,0.0005235146,0.0015445868,0.0016072033,0.01877696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002190784,0.000114125425,0.9923659,0.000023993,0.00003823248,0.000015028733,0.0016662062,0.0033854113,0.00029443426,0.00036831215,0.0016950488,0.0000114722925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90344685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9218075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90344685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01025016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012037141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19424349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117468355","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5972594","title":"Childcare as Economic Infrastructure&amp;nbsp; Federal-Provincial Agreements and Maternal Labour Force Participation in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Labour supply; Baseline (sea); Parental leave; Work (physics); Work force; Current Population Survey; Percentage point","score_opus":0.006901103297891722,"score_gpt":0.26192044546507043,"score_spread":0.2550193421671787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117468355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9296873,0.0031010457,0.00036293417,0.01414901,0.00007812179,0.00008208029,0.010023171,0.000040212883,0.042476125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98458964,0.00091772905,0.00018385099,0.00024942312,0.0000099656645,0.000022210073,0.0009379464,0.000012401277,0.013076811],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974427,0.00025087947,0.00007660541,0.00014008576,0.00050348527,0.001586262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925417,0.0012767531,0.00080474716,0.00017245344,0.0026285928,0.0025757581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013749846,0.00027279108,0.00059533014,0.0021352465,0.0071996544,0.0040991292,0.001846909,0.0011178167,0.014682145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070772124,0.00032994917,0.0005692231,0.005566115,0.0018722962,0.0010608617,0.0022799736,0.0019331706,0.000425212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023532136,0.00019588547,0.8772212,0.00014377075,0.00010245958,0.0002810268,0.009976219,0.0026735305,0.00020305424,0.056733266,0.020668019,0.031566214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003931776,0.000034562563,0.9410055,0.00035948737,0.0000578281,0.000043409582,0.024120195,0.0027239425,0.00018844541,0.0024689718,0.028913755,0.00004454772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99959725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11590617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11590617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21621273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84096205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124712554","doi":"10.64920/iccp25185","title":"Barriers to workplace economic mobility of women in Sri Lanka; Insights from World Bank gender statistics","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Descriptive statistics; Equal employment opportunity; Quarter (Canadian coin); Pension; Official statistics; Qualitative property; Gender analysis","score_opus":0.013206674967384285,"score_gpt":0.26991841901707087,"score_spread":0.25671174404968655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124712554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98054355,0.0014162528,0.00011860299,0.0020993422,0.000020254927,0.000054374563,0.002356575,0.000008569592,0.013382521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997129,0.0012550361,0.00012980774,0.00013738805,0.0000101150645,0.00006755538,0.00050426915,0.0000033624547,0.00076351064],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989286,0.00040923012,0.0001027274,0.00006147778,0.00020680501,0.0002910031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976987,0.00081089465,0.0008899974,0.000056938734,0.00029685587,0.00024656518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001445936,0.00022726558,0.00020479824,0.0024893756,0.0015234322,0.0016960099,0.00045871633,0.00027532742,0.0033792225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040549235,0.00019247583,0.00021071483,0.0041941106,0.0008349224,0.0010320098,0.001599478,0.0004449049,0.00033251295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058872414,0.000043892192,0.8716736,0.00047753632,0.000034335095,0.0006765871,0.09147454,0.00013288339,0.0002444967,0.002460028,0.00454632,0.028176943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028089241,0.0000569935,0.733805,0.00035511347,0.000017377906,0.000194913,0.2547579,0.00012022646,0.00008318342,0.00031216952,0.010277564,0.00001672818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062432542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093026735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062432542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018737047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030230498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124138236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125194033","doi":"10.1093/polsoc/puaf048","title":"Gender-transformative social protection: returning to the feminist debates","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy and Society","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; CLARITY; Rhetorical question; Transformative learning; Power (physics); Field (mathematics); Social change; Public policy","score_opus":0.03417477831749641,"score_gpt":0.32532611567480746,"score_spread":0.291151337357311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125194033","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04332835,0.07368701,0.025300566,0.6754525,0.0049139033,0.000060942475,0.000113268434,0.000049054845,0.17709447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92295754,0.024139222,0.004025302,0.035693478,0.0033306717,0.0001311663,0.00003637743,0.00010411208,0.009582102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97787297,0.017848564,0.00028409736,0.0010537605,0.0015792906,0.0013613013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96616036,0.02933703,0.0011371644,0.0012322514,0.0013530742,0.0007801739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031724792,0.00084007485,0.0009769384,0.0043752748,0.011424595,0.017051173,0.002232963,0.0076494603,0.0063553657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022689879,0.00029210714,0.0006474621,0.003080066,0.11004425,0.019547809,0.009290875,0.011650984,0.0005131241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011133477,0.000013154609,0.00018865253,0.0001054987,0.0000035597693,0.00009539151,0.049168564,0.00010882071,0.000054210243,0.94064647,0.00260169,0.0070027807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068218446,0.000022656814,0.0004706954,0.0015053932,0.000005608393,0.00013539966,0.099063784,0.00023930057,0.00035505262,0.6402548,0.25792426,0.000016270327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007065254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007133006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031724792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015135071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006927256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16777879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125911113","doi":"10.46609/ijsser.2025.v10i11.027","title":"Gendered Incidence of Indirect Taxation in India’s Informal Economy: Evidence from Uttar Pradesh","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incidence (geometry); Uttar pradesh; Unemployment; Per capita; Tax incidence; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.07395774939260744,"score_gpt":0.40764449302421785,"score_spread":0.33368674363161044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125911113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99670887,0.00042971075,0.000050208986,0.00017311059,0.0000051437632,0.0000040099535,0.00023430731,0.000002036474,0.002392661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926084,0.00031979053,0.000031609,0.000022341175,0.000004162661,0.000001630168,0.00010150896,9.3192057e-7,0.00025705036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951434,0.00012688668,0.000040773328,0.00005873185,0.00011067771,0.00014857393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980872,0.0004640726,0.0009785232,0.00013110801,0.00016905037,0.0001699504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040815907,0.00016905784,0.0001736562,0.0014357256,0.00079369545,0.0010660889,0.00046572063,0.00019446554,0.0024771835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019464339,0.00018465036,0.00023335512,0.0023059926,0.0011246765,0.00055441307,0.001267006,0.00046955489,0.00021687984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000848376,0.00006371658,0.968815,0.000078983576,0.000056083692,0.00050091103,0.0107216295,0.00011234569,0.00027690263,0.0025342023,0.000563404,0.016191958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024145877,0.000040989486,0.9883618,0.0000535323,0.000020921008,0.00042214151,0.009210496,0.000099121884,0.00008854531,0.0002561159,0.0014362765,0.00000759905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03108678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053261064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03108678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006851132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065748254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061811626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126021124","doi":"10.15353/rea.v17i4.6596","title":"An Empirical Study on Restrictive Laws and Regulations Affecting Women’s Economic Participation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Analysis","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empirical research; Mainstream; Poverty; Sustainable development; Politics; Economic stability; Distribution (mathematics)","score_opus":0.037389559021689917,"score_gpt":0.3992092448173851,"score_spread":0.36181968579569523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126021124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94652265,0.007632257,0.00049416383,0.0042991345,0.00008832553,0.000060462466,0.00018983138,0.0000031840168,0.04070993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99025893,0.0059963106,0.00017388104,0.00059590075,0.000029717878,0.000048785005,0.0000771357,0.0000043200985,0.0028151271],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959947,0.0021347282,0.00018318111,0.00027881723,0.0008660083,0.00054251956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815646,0.012363982,0.003941089,0.0003812899,0.0012590375,0.0004900624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062199947,0.00016555614,0.00023481499,0.001270936,0.0023706462,0.002033968,0.0006078934,0.0006251956,0.005190816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014227849,0.00020737371,0.00020680683,0.0032739441,0.0030926147,0.0018280526,0.0013691684,0.0010283182,0.00032240545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001248245,0.0004373659,0.4482939,0.0018157172,0.00006894521,0.0013888621,0.31599715,0.00021631554,0.0007659397,0.06176252,0.009014172,0.16011433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009618293,0.00012095106,0.44573396,0.0023685712,0.000043581476,0.0003755751,0.45448107,0.00016118636,0.00044962132,0.0021063704,0.09411658,0.000032909324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0161877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028887872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0161877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022919865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049890587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03289491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126244810","doi":"10.1504/ajesd.2025.151431","title":"Education and women's employment outcomes: evidence from Ethiopia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African J of Economic and Sustainable Development","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; Gouvernement du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Instrumental variable; Estimation; Selection bias; Selection (genetic algorithm); Developing country; Primary education; Average treatment effect; Econometric analysis","score_opus":0.014695110475381327,"score_gpt":0.2776729113048799,"score_spread":0.2629778008294986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126244810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96622276,0.025997085,0.00022124713,0.0009942397,0.00003930232,0.000012925116,0.0008915375,0.0000023074372,0.0056186086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98646253,0.012634964,0.000088537294,0.00022605577,0.000035082347,0.0000063407974,0.00017823676,0.0000013447858,0.00036694956],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956876,0.00019418859,0.00003120234,0.00004777239,0.000058614292,0.00009942389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99477,0.0030529452,0.0015466448,0.00010780858,0.00026106343,0.0002616157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016188673,0.00029130394,0.00038500325,0.0015359004,0.00038612064,0.0010100103,0.00031901832,0.00030417595,0.0033213242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00298973,0.00014182444,0.00036970136,0.0020292145,0.00074978324,0.00029704202,0.00079753355,0.0004287386,0.00020540644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005413816,0.00035576767,0.9434417,0.0017810247,0.0008731339,0.0010372192,0.001449791,0.00073135155,0.00039290724,0.0029090338,0.0009335677,0.045553073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050068476,0.0003165397,0.98427,0.0015481887,0.0006955348,0.00046683708,0.0040189466,0.00022815487,0.0005149901,0.0009021032,0.006970412,0.000018130953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007115059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008295811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007115059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000423826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059936556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014147282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132866182","doi":"","title":"Household education and earnings: evidence from rural Peru","year":2002,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Earnings; Allocative efficiency; Wage; Household income; Labour supply; Rationing; Estimation; Poverty; Labor demand","score_opus":0.0356902352768956,"score_gpt":0.338846949742668,"score_spread":0.3031567144657724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132866182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99748945,0.00028905427,0.000058277827,0.0003213643,0.000001849298,0.000004272124,0.00031875542,0.0000023966136,0.0015144392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981913,0.00059746904,0.000043039272,0.00004195691,0.000011942244,0.0000059334043,0.00039225377,0.0000015634189,0.0007145952],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974984,0.0001191256,0.000013208197,0.00003352314,0.000036466947,0.000047846523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997743,0.00078048295,0.0010011088,0.00012410172,0.00020190356,0.00014930005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005039899,0.00013605684,0.00020752562,0.0008626065,0.000560387,0.0005269691,0.00038171472,0.0003803888,0.0038691503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035148922,0.00015523571,0.00016624632,0.0022461112,0.00045138618,0.00047322866,0.0010853946,0.00046463404,0.00038831314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013548016,0.00016034872,0.9782853,0.00009450881,0.00008831598,0.00061185926,0.008387342,0.00015916827,0.0002303602,0.0006265606,0.00090754806,0.01031319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010090886,0.000113662005,0.99247897,0.000024386072,0.000028586384,0.0001666724,0.005112001,0.0001700348,0.00005067568,0.00015849905,0.0016822435,0.0000041513426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016566789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025461001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016566789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022971601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016494367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032940686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132910229","doi":"","title":"Three Essays on the Social Determinants of Labour Supply","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Receipt; Labour supply; Earnings; Work (physics); Child labour; Public policy; Cash","score_opus":0.03154530083843361,"score_gpt":0.36153004606611083,"score_spread":0.32998474522767723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132910229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047836512,0.085103236,0.028967738,0.37070438,0.0104708085,0.00020402868,0.0015552095,0.00010414913,0.45505384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50290036,0.16593258,0.009156669,0.050567307,0.018791784,0.0005227261,0.0011667364,0.00016581509,0.25079596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987375,0.0004225419,0.00006674956,0.00014864972,0.00041732765,0.00020726907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943084,0.004138463,0.00043388264,0.00029397313,0.0005986546,0.00022647956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022518418,0.0006320619,0.0005189879,0.001621532,0.0018889874,0.0033230262,0.00093007763,0.002207752,0.01597607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008126331,0.0002901,0.0008360823,0.0029764941,0.004574405,0.0027453834,0.002788051,0.0027431024,0.0020256725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003770238,0.00012724372,0.0070093134,0.0005156257,0.000037548663,0.00017356266,0.004264967,0.0016293256,0.00023863159,0.82145965,0.09815947,0.066347115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018822735,0.000052458236,0.009919049,0.0013736123,0.000021484166,0.00017014277,0.0052130413,0.000952103,0.0002442816,0.3861442,0.5958476,0.00004307938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059840837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052181827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01597607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031146368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022741368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05344528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134169167","doi":"10.64906/ijssc.2025.02.04.24","title":"EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT AND LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION AMONG SC/ST WOMEN IN RURAL INDIA","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Sciences and Commerce","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Niagara College","funders":"","keywords":"Caste; Educational attainment; Casual; Disadvantaged; Literacy; Wage; Affirmative action","score_opus":0.016650980546674292,"score_gpt":0.3466710744559561,"score_spread":0.3300200939092818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134169167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991448,0.000046350622,0.000013874811,0.000057048564,0.0000012005316,0.0000016613221,0.00005931088,0.0000010786599,0.0006747414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996693,0.00003938318,0.000008558549,0.00001118532,0.0000015271389,0.0000014084329,0.000035965957,3.5896974e-7,0.00023224147],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997758,0.000039883333,0.000011475932,0.000023003631,0.000036533234,0.000113275695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949765,0.00010403859,0.0001908192,0.0000243009,0.000042506235,0.00014052665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017827027,0.00013872962,0.00011474787,0.00077206094,0.00057012006,0.00058895955,0.00023701866,0.00018411907,0.0019422604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010149388,0.00010342944,0.00017625037,0.00085142604,0.00045101042,0.0002087692,0.00060120673,0.00032858926,0.00032102005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029387915,0.000050647188,0.99541485,0.000009308716,0.000010763793,0.0001274452,0.0014783769,0.000048791488,0.00015509586,0.00013177698,0.000099040735,0.0024444198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012413709,0.000047132224,0.9956944,0.000008521137,0.000008154478,0.00010574363,0.0037134557,0.00009390299,0.00003909393,0.000049714323,0.00023611735,0.000002525819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030514266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051875725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030514266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003351197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047960502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060673296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7151993696","doi":"10.70675/fde75b4dz0029z42f6za573z6f3faae43e91","title":"Essays on Female Labor Force Participation in Developed Countries","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberian dollar; Research methodology; Wage; Limiting","score_opus":0.030048117646560273,"score_gpt":0.3495731351530545,"score_spread":0.3195250175064942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7151993696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22343461,0.20257318,0.0010130657,0.101518795,0.004329192,0.00017018552,0.0027139552,0.000026973019,0.46422008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59528553,0.18891822,0.0006073278,0.008676912,0.0032542765,0.00030610553,0.0012904274,0.000053157968,0.20160806],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880993,0.0005705308,0.00006369993,0.00009713774,0.00023584953,0.00022282494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664766,0.0023756314,0.0003205567,0.00009831498,0.00035262888,0.00020515706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021984952,0.000594873,0.00038969374,0.0033950908,0.0033441924,0.0027558003,0.00045143478,0.0009227067,0.013532849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005196936,0.00019772007,0.0002697074,0.0061943987,0.002848292,0.0013790112,0.001960019,0.0006673679,0.00085296476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021947834,0.00016867288,0.066912435,0.0024587552,0.000066786124,0.0016357235,0.30132598,0.0008350117,0.00057967217,0.12264626,0.28914157,0.2140097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012841365,0.00005119356,0.073167846,0.0021891845,0.000015169909,0.00023450362,0.10102603,0.000069471615,0.00016530513,0.0035470605,0.81950384,0.000017524084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043908954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047177587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043908954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003866606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037293897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08730674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161370639","doi":"","title":"The EI family supplement and relative income in two-earner families with children","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"WinnSpace (University of Winnipeg)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Family income; Panel data; Socioeconomic status; Survey data collection; Foundation (evidence); Data collection; National Longitudinal Surveys","score_opus":0.008351720704374975,"score_gpt":0.22172412948706588,"score_spread":0.2133724087826909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161370639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971258,0.00022681135,0.00006254777,0.00011962837,0.000004485308,0.0000050358744,0.0007887048,0.0000016372558,0.0016652871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987884,0.00014434656,0.000096700314,0.000017550463,0.0000050932777,0.000005917102,0.00050111685,0.000001309867,0.00043955547],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941635,0.00015611442,0.000035124318,0.00004876826,0.00018997428,0.00015359824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974855,0.00067418255,0.0011700771,0.000107448155,0.00021272969,0.00034998654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011350445,0.0001206103,0.00022339889,0.001636074,0.0006580007,0.0006636293,0.00028685626,0.00025523288,0.0024207826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005285263,0.0000879472,0.00020599405,0.0021781567,0.00045853315,0.00048726943,0.0008821683,0.0004318556,0.00013777282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007065526,0.000031470452,0.99222684,0.000009925034,0.00001352201,0.00011399871,0.0007459094,0.00013190691,0.00004985728,0.0006305731,0.00035680833,0.0056184875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013104842,0.000023109613,0.9980438,0.000009016034,0.0000051490706,0.00008474746,0.0008233597,0.00010010119,0.00003238928,0.000113215414,0.00076042046,0.0000033944339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1125962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16615382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8874038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009967939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011012276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22388166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162015591","doi":"10.82308/54188","title":"Three essays in macroeconomics: wealth concentration and optimal progressive taxation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capital (architecture); Capital accumulation; Distribution of wealth; Distribution (mathematics)","score_opus":0.013219324448155762,"score_gpt":0.29378442876215866,"score_spread":0.2805651043140029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162015591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09030875,0.13059463,0.07882745,0.2705579,0.004930359,0.00011172825,0.0011664729,0.00017476246,0.423328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.739441,0.09121183,0.011699463,0.009947912,0.006908733,0.00016836103,0.00042246538,0.0002512112,0.1399491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991831,0.00027144555,0.000039383063,0.00013392649,0.00022946112,0.00014261335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974832,0.0012831623,0.00033386887,0.0002654344,0.00037164497,0.0002627907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016562571,0.00071034196,0.0007392749,0.001353432,0.0019403306,0.0061478913,0.0008426247,0.0021586777,0.009458539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006914907,0.0003903539,0.0009608847,0.0021556804,0.0044029714,0.0035665194,0.0028829898,0.0029453714,0.0009732641],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041559157,0.000033061755,0.001862388,0.00015032371,0.000026366824,0.000102243175,0.00070665195,0.0061947275,0.00022304611,0.94480896,0.02553553,0.02031513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025994987,0.000028279008,0.00403266,0.00048348182,0.000039227045,0.00008678981,0.00065866776,0.0034668914,0.00036989394,0.83978033,0.15099604,0.000031740383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009034809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010210477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009458539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068030325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040892386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04935974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71825659","doi":"","title":"The Hindu Women's Question","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hinduism; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016640930208280235,"score_gpt":0.2667739367764818,"score_spread":0.2501330065682016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W71825659","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20695639,0.032629702,0.00025800633,0.43838394,0.0021638162,0.000024808996,0.00075860415,0.000021522406,0.31880322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89831465,0.009787704,0.00022435974,0.038038246,0.0008369472,0.000025997793,0.00010163057,0.000023729846,0.052646667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983297,0.00041964956,0.000021084577,0.000108723114,0.00026202234,0.00085876137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850744,0.0005691781,0.00010057035,0.000059785867,0.00031174248,0.0004512179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001589113,0.0003253493,0.00033217296,0.0015617574,0.019546283,0.0048351544,0.00093976874,0.0029569017,0.011006842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036606013,0.00020329046,0.00018543727,0.0033837883,0.0137671735,0.0025895922,0.0018418939,0.0031052523,0.0006433596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019608355,0.000059152873,0.015181259,0.00029109858,0.000025411899,0.0007317621,0.15038201,0.00008755561,0.0005441117,0.6041249,0.17475392,0.053622697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031203548,0.000031243122,0.04956383,0.00049116346,0.000018695016,0.00042222804,0.23521432,0.00007305915,0.00028334674,0.026050875,0.68776816,0.00005176378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8660827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93384194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8660827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023276716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02865498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26941186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W72827454","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Female Education on Fertility: Evidence from Turkey","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Grand Challenges Canada","keywords":"Fertility; Demography; Total fertility rate; Population; Instrumental variable; Family planning; Economics; Research methodology; Sociology","score_opus":0.039676217864746975,"score_gpt":0.290681322069725,"score_spread":0.25100510420497807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W72827454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98724097,0.006296893,0.00016997241,0.00053638074,0.000023434268,0.000010819946,0.0010115594,0.0000062073254,0.0047037867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965257,0.0025533992,0.0000571591,0.000091831374,0.000017019658,0.0000031337022,0.000496324,0.0000020002265,0.00025347067],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993223,0.00025794847,0.000049292674,0.00011787711,0.00011558162,0.00013701842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99559397,0.0021555913,0.0015377499,0.00020595391,0.000362468,0.00014422848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001278646,0.0003108641,0.0004738839,0.0009863526,0.00030343185,0.000461557,0.0005058231,0.00038191435,0.002768787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028491819,0.00015962354,0.00067364523,0.0014852824,0.0007235518,0.0002445385,0.00051440863,0.0004504126,0.0002788151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008709466,0.0002577298,0.94642043,0.00051158946,0.00076462503,0.0009982333,0.00069155364,0.0014864551,0.00031132737,0.0017520877,0.0015355934,0.044399343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003754741,0.00022814555,0.99532557,0.000100497025,0.00030069897,0.00020184896,0.00067055033,0.00025807892,0.00027832715,0.00014704106,0.0024425066,0.000009310748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044973273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041927718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044973273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082299823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006498673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W73525749","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.36.2.227","title":"Does Family Policy Environment Moderate the Effect of Single-Parenthood on Children’s Academic Achievement? A Study of 14 European Countries","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic achievement; Welfare; Developmental psychology; Psychology; Single mothers; Single parent; Demographic economics; Political science; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.049632105871364844,"score_gpt":0.34080349854687375,"score_spread":0.2911713926755089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W73525749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99941576,0.0001314727,0.000015003383,0.000030068855,0.0000014493354,0.0000011252247,0.000025065578,3.1020002e-7,0.0003798101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975806,0.00008899292,0.000020353933,0.000012238786,9.4275975e-7,0.0000019583906,0.00003383242,5.0312366e-7,0.00008311333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983633,0.00093569775,0.00007422757,0.0001859492,0.00008606912,0.00035472008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947436,0.002167846,0.0019273539,0.00033137944,0.00030553792,0.0005243037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002939612,0.00022205782,0.0005021598,0.0006321574,0.0010198714,0.0013151234,0.00036776217,0.00039697936,0.0015104049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005099141,0.00018613825,0.0005361256,0.0008954548,0.0011213287,0.00082994933,0.0015097427,0.00045756207,0.000123847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024529576,0.00014750747,0.99071807,0.000020271053,0.000167141,0.00018909092,0.003033131,0.000173076,0.000158102,0.00062977616,0.00009288392,0.0044256905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010339997,0.00012817926,0.99451184,0.000021502039,0.000048823105,0.000046848192,0.004492566,0.00007215346,0.00014154258,0.00006974784,0.00045152035,0.0000048742786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027830876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030505769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027830876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008607998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007776075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055337727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W744838098","doi":"","title":"Counting on Marilyn Waring: New advances in feminist economics Toronto [Book Review]","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand sociology","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Publishing; Media studies; Project commissioning; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.015827506383768074,"score_gpt":0.2933166084890871,"score_spread":0.277489102105319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W744838098","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012750318,0.9325168,0.00040919756,0.035481848,0.0072068134,0.000011829642,0.00010706354,0.000022370688,0.024116654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033047206,0.93957794,0.00033287136,0.007134865,0.010265219,0.00003086281,0.00011432866,0.000046050136,0.039193045],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883026,0.00024113679,0.00004223565,0.00011638505,0.00067301834,0.00009700492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966744,0.0016922839,0.00021475095,0.000091579364,0.0010767018,0.00025028328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001412113,0.0011437034,0.0015181286,0.0029571154,0.0015210471,0.0034242738,0.0014339725,0.0021739376,0.02624811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005901578,0.00045040553,0.00045943857,0.007824842,0.0043507665,0.0044220085,0.0015952088,0.00322076,0.0044050203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072784633,0.0000035880369,0.000073628165,0.0007157918,0.000009444604,0.000024355528,0.0002167762,0.000111387475,0.000025558475,0.015041942,0.9026372,0.081133045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028637076,0.0000038166,0.000605628,0.0012585303,0.0000071756017,0.00004579451,0.00019056875,0.000032356562,0.00001579784,0.004277913,0.9935493,0.0000104028495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17024665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3251161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17024665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0141469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014772549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3385114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W75489384","doi":"10.18584/iipj.2013.4.4.1","title":"Pathways to Higher Education for Native Hawaiian Individual Development Account Participants","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Indigenous Policy Journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Hawaii Community Foundation","keywords":"Native Hawaiians; Graduation (instrument); Indigenous; Asset (computer security); Receipt; Unemployment; Welfare; Psychological intervention; Demographic economics; Gerontology; Sociology; Economic growth; Psychology; Economics; Demography; Medicine; Pacific islanders; Population; Accounting","score_opus":0.0837999851720656,"score_gpt":0.3721549008686296,"score_spread":0.288354915696564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W75489384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9629228,0.00026418763,0.0003029536,0.008822946,0.00006142807,0.00014021776,0.0004299554,0.000022092792,0.027033342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796942,0.00031281458,0.00069478987,0.0007143959,0.000021653355,0.00011639437,0.00025671642,0.0000066989332,0.018182477],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930894,0.00016058891,0.000011687934,0.000035479843,0.00004711459,0.0004362762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981452,0.00014539956,0.0001768712,0.000034769033,0.00011669197,0.001381129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007679163,0.00013854018,0.00011877846,0.00064996886,0.0036067255,0.0020977168,0.0005252648,0.00065988814,0.019839812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029673257,0.00014484457,0.00021590186,0.00065826974,0.00042911601,0.0010600509,0.003483646,0.0012512982,0.0010844443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027248423,0.0021854243,0.6947478,0.00017358997,0.000030320178,0.0019823245,0.06240794,0.00045327828,0.0010730985,0.020339493,0.026119774,0.19021453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008192667,0.0004244212,0.6623132,0.00045903545,0.000021765682,0.00044783094,0.22236772,0.001258504,0.000672071,0.009580025,0.10230085,0.00007261347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06746965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18517005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06746965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024157164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065092756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1341539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W785464703","doi":"","title":"Demand for Liquidity and Welfare Cost of Ination by Cohort and Age of Households","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Market liquidity; Liberian dollar; Consumption (sociology); Welfare; Economics; Cohort; Monetary economics; Demographic economics; Finance; Medicine; Internal medicine; Market economy","score_opus":0.03760180224355271,"score_gpt":0.32668279896143226,"score_spread":0.28908099671787957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W785464703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962263,0.00031739112,0.00046440493,0.00033096375,0.000005457877,0.0000046943123,0.0011529708,0.000011181783,0.0014866422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771786,0.00021737607,0.00008801721,0.00003087144,0.000014672123,0.0000050445283,0.0006241393,0.000002731126,0.0012992857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997284,0.00008721813,0.000017890154,0.00004011018,0.000027264663,0.000099127676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99574405,0.0016665182,0.0016632015,0.00033707303,0.00016430071,0.00042487073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010327145,0.00017269024,0.00032806967,0.00057324796,0.00020934845,0.0010745283,0.0002967547,0.00054324436,0.007020147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048726588,0.00017822202,0.00048021207,0.00059300405,0.00030428416,0.00064778555,0.00045258328,0.00042309792,0.0005616797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008753002,0.00025305993,0.95640695,0.000047920566,0.0002600983,0.0003912784,0.00042406004,0.006556693,0.0021082568,0.008766424,0.0012320977,0.022677831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000444605,0.00029094258,0.9767493,0.000033526863,0.00011144563,0.00037327778,0.0008143323,0.010570033,0.000413186,0.009099312,0.0014763691,0.000023825354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004570112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004661139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007020147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006114324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022099858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023484707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W811313881","doi":"","title":"Opportunity Denied: Limiting Black Women to Devalued Work (review)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Limiting; Work (physics); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.04474826489902884,"score_gpt":0.29225456946900663,"score_spread":0.2475063045699778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W811313881","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000852496,0.9973483,0.000034892048,0.00095353136,0.00018831441,0.00001280715,0.000031454863,0.0000016957649,0.0005765273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0074643735,0.9904012,0.00014976301,0.0014278663,0.00021968564,0.000034453642,0.000027752083,0.0000022078577,0.00027259171],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990914,0.00036457705,0.0001570185,0.00010918631,0.00016656198,0.00011137358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961773,0.0026058492,0.0006996703,0.00005811514,0.00024084358,0.00021821348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036802446,0.00052577775,0.0026021441,0.0011655965,0.00068819575,0.0016164645,0.0014260373,0.0019831,0.0062104645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007218657,0.0003618792,0.0013631898,0.0015124335,0.0012184584,0.0012594267,0.0013455707,0.0015661318,0.00047500004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081594667,0.00010338969,0.0014352055,0.17790893,0.0014353868,0.00017208453,0.0006515923,0.00007515615,0.00027155984,0.0014255653,0.020762902,0.7949422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017884682,0.00094412564,0.02227051,0.48250923,0.011231035,0.0013775215,0.0043112584,0.00007929342,0.00057333184,0.003853851,0.47096714,0.00009422938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00919253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03638724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00919253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007537043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037722976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020776093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W8423967","doi":"","title":"The Status of TANF Leavers in the District of Columbia: Final Report.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Welfare; Sample (material); Demography; Socioeconomics; Human services; Geography; Economic growth; Political science; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.031130215139146745,"score_gpt":0.2908914707450298,"score_spread":0.25976125560588303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W8423967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528613,0.001105712,0.000079317906,0.0010629848,0.00004964402,0.00018263562,0.026806943,0.000045956844,0.017805403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747318,0.0012786149,0.00017760284,0.00021147553,0.000015314854,0.00010619358,0.01046842,0.000011708191,0.012998987],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995135,0.000027530768,0.000027854869,0.00003799141,0.00016216679,0.0002308784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988009,0.00004736538,0.00011296683,0.000027292908,0.0006568489,0.0003545969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032798835,0.00028644822,0.00018094234,0.0026205932,0.0018901862,0.00072451815,0.0010536707,0.0005821546,0.005216005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011911886,0.0002458603,0.00016554495,0.0024678702,0.00033143308,0.00028776898,0.00080789183,0.0005145288,0.0006444163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008801693,0.000101922225,0.9690493,0.00007561334,0.000016217338,0.00085552625,0.0010185606,0.000101869075,0.0002203276,0.000080768186,0.0141232,0.014268694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006167728,0.00002609555,0.9918486,0.00004592149,0.000014017262,0.00017619008,0.0046321726,0.00012229997,0.00009045354,0.000019726265,0.0030090816,0.000009296185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9567308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9854091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9567308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052044154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009422826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087047994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W890296400","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2816","title":"Uncovering Women in Taxation: The Gender Impact of Detaxation, Tax Expenditures, and Joint Tax/Benefit Units","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Joint (building); Economics; Politics; Public economics; Tax reform; Indirect tax; Direct tax; Democracy; Progressive tax; Tax policy; Economic policy; Labour economics; Political science; State income tax; Law; Gross income","score_opus":0.04885574430909785,"score_gpt":0.28849791679935316,"score_spread":0.23964217249025532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W890296400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8235127,0.006640471,0.0018976695,0.027508918,0.00023715386,0.000020671565,0.00015010592,0.000007494545,0.14002487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913455,0.001633032,0.00020935386,0.000972138,0.000046811852,0.00000983799,0.000018144616,0.000009610992,0.005755563],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985655,0.0008119006,0.000019680701,0.00011235398,0.0001930528,0.00029751894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997687,0.0015408181,0.00034496153,0.00009731266,0.00014154857,0.00018844969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029289618,0.0001991535,0.00022559676,0.0011778729,0.004723085,0.0045500235,0.000543486,0.00063759554,0.00458399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005079191,0.00016014738,0.00012039773,0.0014726565,0.011091705,0.0051326863,0.0037128488,0.0015326899,0.00023941461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015922832,0.00007580235,0.07363906,0.00008350403,0.000016539387,0.00050925615,0.43792456,0.00014845138,0.00041483095,0.42049155,0.008174835,0.058362484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015615078,0.000061445055,0.058642987,0.0005063586,0.000021346068,0.00031104215,0.7031073,0.0002861195,0.00065350527,0.081933014,0.15443617,0.00002514311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026483184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06339638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026483184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004976871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032363662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05265808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89213157","doi":"10.7202/010297ar","title":"Effet de la précarité économique sur la formation d’une première union au Canada","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers québécois de démographie","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.006852848131560885,"score_gpt":0.21098146636610884,"score_spread":0.20412861823454795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W89213157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9495856,0.0020193965,0.00039780512,0.0067793336,0.000043635024,0.000046028166,0.00092972314,0.000029896646,0.040168736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740794,0.0012909444,0.00024352201,0.00032831592,0.00001311764,0.000011770885,0.00022486135,0.000007754968,0.023800304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839336,0.00012843791,0.000036623725,0.000117995194,0.0005741407,0.00074943143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99591064,0.0008751096,0.0007297412,0.00012289154,0.0013334376,0.0010281097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010408593,0.00019298743,0.00036762125,0.0013212872,0.0057740044,0.0024539547,0.00071260356,0.0006021524,0.014616632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004660236,0.00022096865,0.000396108,0.0017461418,0.0014713529,0.00044997683,0.0013226445,0.00085020106,0.00038367856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060712174,0.00019312836,0.82111746,0.00022102782,0.00017940222,0.00068201195,0.016729021,0.0018596643,0.0011682273,0.037294295,0.011713945,0.10823474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043603766,0.00009654195,0.9430972,0.00015134596,0.00009812916,0.000089429544,0.015790341,0.0008342108,0.0007491286,0.0014216363,0.037588924,0.000039514627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9829321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99297273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024609962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024609962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0479121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17855859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W915136034","doi":"","title":"Social Production and Reproduction at the Interfaces of Public and Private Spheres","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Gender Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reproduction; Sociology; Public sphere; Private sphere; Social reproduction; Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Social science; Political science; Law; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.26037273197101074,"score_gpt":0.4447495647143584,"score_spread":0.18437683274334765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W915136034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01324286,0.206045,0.003306181,0.03688117,0.008662141,0.000069675174,0.00025409175,0.00023269108,0.73130614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18022926,0.20242944,0.002493136,0.0065904246,0.011832715,0.00015475326,0.00031347922,0.00048479275,0.595472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907744,0.00034887154,0.000035095065,0.000116657684,0.00030609747,0.00011584327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909115,0.0005772223,0.000053899275,0.00006859288,0.000077604156,0.00013143802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009013712,0.0008751208,0.00075166085,0.0011077204,0.0021915596,0.014264692,0.0004933839,0.0014292581,0.03935376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015829493,0.00047709467,0.00034547018,0.0020904108,0.00826424,0.006864158,0.0044566677,0.0024450468,0.007109046],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004668567,0.000052708514,0.00087558635,0.0008432679,0.000023664448,0.0003982267,0.03419677,0.000303342,0.001424191,0.37686548,0.34171796,0.24325216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048012903,0.000020259675,0.0019162807,0.0006825318,0.0000058871424,0.00024152933,0.010713618,0.00008237221,0.00015046504,0.031132985,0.95503706,0.000012235972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002184063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035106975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03935376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017909135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002523304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13165146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W91977020","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00416.x","title":"Children as consumers: investigating child diary expenditure data","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commodity; Consumer Expenditure Survey; Clothing; Economics; Child obesity; Consumer expenditure; Child care; Demographic economics; Psychology; Public economics; Childhood obesity; Medicine; Aggregate expenditure; Geography; Obesity; Pediatrics; Finance","score_opus":0.12047287486683238,"score_gpt":0.23273714303659704,"score_spread":0.11226426816976466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W91977020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98732275,0.00051697675,0.0005098151,0.00024902044,0.0000089276255,0.000047688965,0.008065727,0.000009898242,0.003269217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98833114,0.0007186178,0.0016102118,0.000084431274,0.000012201505,0.00013271724,0.007286137,0.000015657992,0.0018088351],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978169,0.0011019494,0.00017757938,0.00022341436,0.00047567548,0.00020449594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877303,0.0056849513,0.0041901455,0.0008940703,0.0011261684,0.00037433594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030297225,0.00023055729,0.0003804838,0.0018153327,0.00054177095,0.001597872,0.0005433422,0.0006316659,0.0038340183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01446375,0.00039826185,0.00031218873,0.00505834,0.00043595734,0.0009839667,0.0009566959,0.0006837141,0.0006267835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001260199,0.000060438266,0.984984,0.00009382607,0.000057998273,0.00011327281,0.0049957433,0.00024078437,0.00017866617,0.0006427947,0.0012479726,0.0072586224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006672746,0.00006982985,0.9851328,0.00005344297,0.000027640044,0.00019831378,0.007416645,0.0007954137,0.00023361504,0.00013643249,0.0059147007,0.00001448509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07239754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09798739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07239754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015278108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008428009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14395225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93116198","doi":"","title":"Failure to launch: Cross-national trends in the transition to economic independence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Independence (probability theory); Demographic economics; Wage; Economics; Demography; Geography; Political science; Development economics; Labour economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02694420071983883,"score_gpt":0.31321637336589003,"score_spread":0.2862721726460512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93116198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99646914,0.00053605955,0.000055065993,0.00013480846,0.000007532391,0.0000040909763,0.0011911141,0.0000050006092,0.0015971808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978531,0.00030303237,0.000048666123,0.000034385597,0.0000060802813,0.000005536022,0.0013896909,0.0000032514563,0.00035629253],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995316,0.000059107544,0.0000556236,0.00009258288,0.000092750975,0.00016840853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976585,0.00026863813,0.0010176561,0.000094803836,0.0005966601,0.00036367576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008008208,0.0001229485,0.00025033398,0.0015530111,0.0004645304,0.0011169316,0.00035595914,0.000353252,0.0015560574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025727616,0.00013530515,0.00026927984,0.0024748459,0.00039820644,0.0008129443,0.0010342041,0.0005907597,0.00029720206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002654929,0.0000084599515,0.99586123,0.000011239983,0.000018191999,0.000029816825,0.0006623377,0.000047409594,0.00004454335,0.000063917345,0.00022012896,0.0030063123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.8635841e-7,0.000007803663,0.9989281,0.0000043446225,0.0000024878032,0.000018474573,0.00062810164,0.00002547515,0.000016049089,0.0000066073508,0.00036081226,0.0000013499944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.100937955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15647542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100937955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072696886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056625117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20070088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W985688087","doi":"10.7202/029010ar","title":"Labour Supply Implications of a Negative Income Tax Plan","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour supply; Economics; Labour economics; Work (physics); Income tax; Plan (archaeology); Gross income; Business; State income tax; Tax reform; Public economics; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.02894462910739055,"score_gpt":0.2844743482014301,"score_spread":0.25552971909403954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W985688087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9477071,0.00018628249,0.0006697791,0.0059474655,0.00012021707,0.000031910906,0.00023262031,0.000010471273,0.045094088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960303,0.00007158976,0.00007346549,0.00024649233,0.000025222113,0.0000072757684,0.000048313555,0.0000014320977,0.0034959028],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999387,0.00021160713,0.00002795331,0.000036355985,0.00015937217,0.00017761979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972541,0.0012596729,0.00060007244,0.00013788916,0.00043343197,0.0003147573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012028642,0.00011063587,0.0001442153,0.00030660446,0.0007773309,0.00076065934,0.00029763082,0.0005635088,0.012068642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053004115,0.00007777945,0.0002202772,0.00027828343,0.0007318391,0.00044418135,0.00057478045,0.0007021687,0.0004194345],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00452814,0.0027482822,0.62033105,0.00027215207,0.0001498211,0.0072090533,0.004449394,0.024251355,0.015042083,0.17514591,0.010329295,0.13554356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020762742,0.0024019592,0.864625,0.00016264987,0.000116588344,0.0010538853,0.023779407,0.008435667,0.0036962796,0.051821306,0.04362643,0.000073290576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008219122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012792571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012068642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011050954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001098402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040373564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}