{"meta":{"query_hash":"e1e2db0870d4","filters":{"topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights"},"cohort_total":36,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":36,"exported":36,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e1e2db0870d4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Immigration+Law+and+Human+Rights"},"results":[{"id":"W1569131746","doi":"10.3968/5232","title":"Several Thoughts on Promoting the Modernization of National Governance Capacity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in sociology of science","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Modernization theory; Corporate governance; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Process (computing); Public administration; Economic system; Business; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.0897633650759647,"score_gpt":0.3840431328598111,"score_spread":0.2942797677838464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569131746","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009087336,0.0056258417,0.0111382585,0.8716185,0.004465125,0.00007349835,0.00012578648,0.000117592135,0.09774812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6335674,0.012330105,0.03374265,0.2517659,0.005428096,0.00043585844,0.0001574497,0.0001097541,0.062462848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966756,0.0016798797,0.000120910045,0.00052212796,0.00046766436,0.00053376204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99269134,0.0033694285,0.00068290555,0.00073559856,0.0015434565,0.0009772417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070982063,0.000505486,0.0003155569,0.001100924,0.004959689,0.006764726,0.0019082332,0.006204361,0.010757528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012516764,0.0002007992,0.0005960682,0.0008939753,0.021353219,0.013644908,0.003901323,0.009547312,0.0011615293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002744038,0.000028201137,0.00053914357,0.000120015124,0.000008096051,0.00015555718,0.004314387,0.00021651543,0.00018753526,0.95742476,0.030108387,0.0068699783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000378569,0.000058533173,0.0019037706,0.00046567665,0.000017873348,0.00020019212,0.015736934,0.000555627,0.0009915145,0.6535238,0.32641357,0.0000946774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061661773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010852645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010757528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003472725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006043803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037539363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608947772","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1269","title":"Moore v. British Columbia: A Good IDEA?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Remedial education; Political science; Public administration; Tribunal; School choice; Law; Human rights; Voucher; Legislature; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.019144626844349838,"score_gpt":0.27458372708350964,"score_spread":0.25543910023915983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608947772","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00659102,0.026340503,0.0007483905,0.7561527,0.0060299076,0.00007192202,0.00083456194,0.00016151773,0.20306952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10161027,0.011052925,0.0015341457,0.7517939,0.0011642389,0.00014658611,0.0005097067,0.00014808052,0.13204013],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927127,0.00082610425,0.00024112574,0.0009046792,0.0028909396,0.002424416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99354255,0.0012023372,0.00021038669,0.00026347264,0.002792484,0.0019888422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036075364,0.00093439926,0.0011014679,0.0027437485,0.021973962,0.014804361,0.003660149,0.016779235,0.014993247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011665951,0.0007975442,0.00073450885,0.0035803996,0.010148851,0.006427253,0.0028458664,0.019555492,0.0020044367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004242754,0.000032335218,0.0022405577,0.00012575493,0.000024893292,0.0004676312,0.0012653853,0.00014718094,0.0002028642,0.21950454,0.7506057,0.025340678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006494655,0.000025741678,0.006414804,0.0012940256,0.000057901438,0.0001814818,0.0043211137,0.000283415,0.00021424217,0.046837505,0.9400825,0.00022233833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98348135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99030966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06955471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06955471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15163513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5046571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1748374369","doi":"","title":"Comprehensive Immigration Reform(s): Immigration Regulation Beyond Our Borders","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration law; Immigration reform; Immigration policy; Political science; Legislature; Enforcement; German; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.01390077885830982,"score_gpt":0.29535965657875846,"score_spread":0.28145887772044864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1748374369","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101301216,0.013510247,0.012118879,0.61581886,0.0020070402,0.00015521715,0.00008903465,0.0001524861,0.2548471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84314364,0.0041527124,0.005617457,0.1321416,0.0009975168,0.00013337954,0.00006378685,0.000021688355,0.013728198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99156016,0.0030740965,0.00034007177,0.0012475045,0.0016291586,0.0021489458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949981,0.001556126,0.0005950179,0.0007537478,0.0009857133,0.0011113419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010131899,0.00023728094,0.00048983283,0.0009182229,0.007888293,0.0099432655,0.0015827956,0.009030588,0.0026643178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014332072,0.0003559897,0.0010685342,0.00093707314,0.015566415,0.008349657,0.006866236,0.008405288,0.00029849727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008930309,0.000033914308,0.0008349545,0.00004106912,0.000008704117,0.000060625072,0.0029811722,0.00038668484,0.00026917653,0.97106713,0.009926401,0.014381239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007364758,0.00019392876,0.013989886,0.0013480441,0.000112565045,0.00021432951,0.010261616,0.0024504387,0.00087253755,0.53440547,0.43597168,0.000105809035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05275167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062394872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05275167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01005956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03149048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104889214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065721359","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v1n2p12","title":"Selecting a Mode of Way to the Regional Rule of Law at Present China","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Promotion (chess); China; Law; Mode (computer interface); Autonomy; Chinese law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public law; Law and economics; Municipal law; Sociology; Computer science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030108484456659607,"score_gpt":0.305636676771135,"score_spread":0.2755281923144754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065721359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26529294,0.0020337985,0.09748921,0.022813763,0.0007928083,0.00089558,0.00020632862,0.0005779283,0.6098977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8612859,0.0009940263,0.03602708,0.0015274644,0.00016694661,0.00051638373,0.00007343203,0.00005984615,0.09934885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850285,0.0003788698,0.00010046463,0.00035374178,0.00035200024,0.00031212153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993919,0.0000905696,0.00008325628,0.00009454059,0.0002373117,0.00010235531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022682112,0.00027985108,0.00031385216,0.0008320284,0.0028253952,0.0046285205,0.00093389064,0.0012460806,0.0051838546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020372595,0.00024457512,0.00038753284,0.0009179509,0.0034806118,0.0022904486,0.0013477568,0.0018802681,0.00076643267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018333954,0.000033602588,0.0053425445,0.00011924508,0.0000142334,0.00038865782,0.0046956385,0.0005320574,0.0015766544,0.9273038,0.007521647,0.052453604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016906614,0.00034415993,0.03149212,0.000656568,0.00010754833,0.0014048896,0.009329132,0.0108516645,0.005090843,0.36098135,0.5793776,0.0001950097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0108227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017060623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0108227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004174344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009651772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030287087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204045736","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2673543","title":"As Good as it Gets? Security, Asylum, and the Rule of Law after the Certificate Trilogy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Rule of law; Law; Certificate; Political science; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.026527175914029383,"score_gpt":0.29472025961944365,"score_spread":0.2681930837054143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2204045736","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13752298,0.0026967856,0.0014633023,0.55497074,0.0034399284,0.00002899131,0.00009634323,0.000035460987,0.2997455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367061,0.0006616776,0.0002411716,0.02589649,0.00078440644,0.000022313377,0.000020127201,0.000034868677,0.03563281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934562,0.0021904225,0.00020156267,0.0005671957,0.00067399273,0.0029106492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99278957,0.003129494,0.00094979815,0.00041587694,0.00086828717,0.0018470178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009221326,0.0001861947,0.0004687403,0.0006650457,0.014403962,0.012110365,0.0011520709,0.009751181,0.012992639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029543567,0.0002775246,0.00047988148,0.0006726701,0.020742271,0.010414392,0.005868873,0.018471085,0.0014868327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006488922,0.000055121203,0.002925488,0.000016493947,0.000006508099,0.00019777782,0.008250745,0.00008678351,0.00007562646,0.9512836,0.02707153,0.009965496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010191795,0.00017351976,0.014051083,0.00057690364,0.000050663406,0.0003592846,0.058202058,0.0005985536,0.0007550572,0.67359424,0.25139207,0.00014462437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03560693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051034775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03560693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006235424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016470322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07079935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2351366877","doi":"","title":"The Research on Immigration Laws in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force Academy","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration law; China; Work (physics); Law; Political science; Immigration policy; Order (exchange); Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02699917582851571,"score_gpt":0.36814110740921474,"score_spread":0.34114193158069905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2351366877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60521066,0.016716607,0.0003405871,0.029699344,0.00031459113,0.00012779677,0.0007976542,0.000021642842,0.34677118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95726717,0.01692001,0.00031546506,0.0026761391,0.000055088138,0.000041321884,0.0003405384,0.000015123285,0.022369087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961681,0.00045819723,0.00013557615,0.00030782435,0.0013764034,0.0015538301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875525,0.0032565694,0.0010377206,0.00021819727,0.0061160335,0.00181883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002349907,0.00024805832,0.0004449439,0.0064293817,0.025358321,0.007586157,0.0013371292,0.0011876369,0.0067732497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011698367,0.00028734267,0.00030916464,0.016201215,0.008474141,0.0028167055,0.0021469695,0.002393798,0.00028028953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005235042,0.00024352835,0.1650488,0.00082630944,0.000055936838,0.0017250788,0.27914324,0.00066874473,0.0005429221,0.3718473,0.05859192,0.121253885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008848663,0.00003358889,0.36483812,0.0019046043,0.00006670915,0.00025237718,0.3190713,0.00056270475,0.00043112438,0.0034673812,0.30928937,0.000073824944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99833846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17352678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17352678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30891484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9585918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2372206402","doi":"","title":"Reflections on Equal Protection to Public and Non-public Economy in the Criminal Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PROTO Manufacturing (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Legislation; Socialist market economy; Principal (computer security); Criminal law; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Socialism; Political science; Public law; Social economy; Economics; China; Politics","score_opus":0.21103500135389122,"score_gpt":0.3609294467969373,"score_spread":0.14989444544304606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2372206402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08550953,0.006759956,0.0197458,0.2889234,0.0020450018,0.00009536931,0.000058169797,0.000033450837,0.5968293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96497345,0.0013938072,0.003268866,0.015326004,0.0007981449,0.0000860788,0.000013408901,0.000025352028,0.01411489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98259443,0.010883502,0.00047573872,0.0013063141,0.002364205,0.0023758472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99005413,0.007658655,0.0005436771,0.000707133,0.00065318204,0.00038317856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012876669,0.00047752284,0.0006033852,0.0016814563,0.008173387,0.012901543,0.0015410593,0.011259951,0.0039589573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012819826,0.00037278855,0.0010122538,0.001185084,0.08035198,0.01324992,0.0075377827,0.0146911135,0.0003121253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032887299,0.000009243514,0.000056540877,0.000008183903,0.0000012237743,0.00004078795,0.0019110831,0.00003925611,0.000026978503,0.9965371,0.00051430095,0.00085211213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018807194,0.000022768774,0.0005586789,0.00016158965,0.0000074093928,0.00007674531,0.004801195,0.00029500507,0.00036123276,0.9572274,0.036453474,0.000015646956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051062675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044906586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012901543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00995208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055193943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07220775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513284339","doi":"","title":"Bridging the global divide on human rights : a Canada-China dialogue","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Right to property; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; Law; Linguistic rights; Chinese law; International law; Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women; Municipal law","score_opus":0.0210295341026237,"score_gpt":0.2802699208260878,"score_spread":0.2592403867234641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513284339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06662507,0.060425993,0.0010802639,0.41912928,0.0033031935,0.00007552775,0.00018884488,0.000060901148,0.44911098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7141766,0.040395495,0.0015420512,0.048144143,0.0006658834,0.000105460604,0.00012225899,0.000074547635,0.19477363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752337,0.00053326064,0.000032158074,0.0001282664,0.0006946161,0.0010884203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984469,0.00048476775,0.00005253893,0.00003912465,0.00037410145,0.000602646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029492343,0.0008520619,0.00059785903,0.002338541,0.035265174,0.013899667,0.0017000409,0.004998875,0.0072602616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024645117,0.0002888911,0.00039756807,0.007165835,0.020207418,0.004944008,0.005057195,0.005390447,0.00027952684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027870794,0.00003240066,0.0014613637,0.0001558314,0.000009200713,0.0006579321,0.07725205,0.00031989592,0.00015932051,0.74124855,0.14973392,0.02894163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002773243,0.000014937271,0.0045734057,0.00043552055,0.00001902116,0.00012823247,0.1190281,0.00042343023,0.00016770889,0.038071822,0.83706135,0.000048739978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96976805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98782593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12180108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12180108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2098168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8837328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520308867","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the Best Interests of the Child Principle","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Best interests; Supreme court; Expansive; Citizenship; Statutory law; Political science; Law; Immigration; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Residence; Child support; Child custody; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.01193591445684604,"score_gpt":0.2843986646056423,"score_spread":0.27246275014879623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520308867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04381944,0.009774124,0.01152348,0.2178253,0.0014733933,0.000071627364,0.0002880022,0.0000504731,0.7151742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7810046,0.0061164745,0.0070219524,0.1456252,0.0016777898,0.00010827776,0.00014020804,0.00015072369,0.0581547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98502696,0.0037204437,0.0004640551,0.001761841,0.0054574967,0.0035691096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990105,0.0056276317,0.00044285483,0.00058125687,0.002471469,0.00077185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012218988,0.00048708412,0.00066509924,0.001706992,0.010729598,0.012101321,0.0034965882,0.010881327,0.004689328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015626712,0.00051998097,0.00088813703,0.0014828383,0.034094036,0.0074551725,0.005857986,0.020087898,0.00072676665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045867296,0.0000055521664,0.00041485848,0.00001674995,0.0000040994432,0.00021296593,0.0027671256,0.000068829584,0.000087359294,0.9849471,0.008363689,0.0031071333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042590516,0.00003398777,0.0034508782,0.0007850538,0.00005362091,0.00046519728,0.007240553,0.0005662801,0.00080401654,0.48106134,0.5054235,0.0000730062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.428513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5475117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.428513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029877916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052847426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85203755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594711691","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6265-171-5_6","title":"Subjectivity Reflected in the Common Law Tradition","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"International criminal justice series","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Political science; Liability; Law; Law and economics; Strict liability; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07423204887761979,"score_gpt":0.3519077044679716,"score_spread":0.2776756555903518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594711691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08840968,0.008962348,0.040204436,0.026581064,0.0007937849,0.00009960001,0.00005980519,0.000067277215,0.8348221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97097594,0.0023215304,0.0039482894,0.0025813407,0.0005284178,0.000114153765,0.000043168304,0.00009339554,0.019393729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9672386,0.018771715,0.0010169158,0.0034546973,0.007569198,0.0019489168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98416394,0.010139844,0.0012938444,0.0022585026,0.0015337657,0.00061018235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02043209,0.0004936445,0.00097387953,0.003274842,0.010013793,0.014450181,0.0015639642,0.0038146335,0.0036641227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018353857,0.00041724037,0.00077619427,0.0031406614,0.099470094,0.01753052,0.008347588,0.008659195,0.0005120121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028386476,0.0000034634895,0.00008244542,0.000010551805,0.0000024627811,0.000019941825,0.00888224,0.00004360437,0.000024957371,0.9896283,0.00025159723,0.0010475842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000139597405,0.000032842225,0.000625953,0.0002454397,0.000009746391,0.00011613914,0.008941961,0.0002970795,0.0001838169,0.9032566,0.08625604,0.000020393602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066081327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031748293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02043209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010680498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008088235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108056486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606604158","doi":"10.29173/alr766","title":"The Impact of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on Canadian Jurisprudence: The Case of Leobrera v. Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Jurisprudence; Convention; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Political science; Law; Immigration policy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02344196393991993,"score_gpt":0.31477541669311404,"score_spread":0.2913334527531941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606604158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068765245,0.09409885,0.0016154497,0.28135335,0.0019258399,0.0001123235,0.00030879234,0.00005292248,0.55176723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8080463,0.044325456,0.0013486741,0.095511176,0.0006130412,0.00008226533,0.00014304905,0.00008256683,0.04984763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97931653,0.0031348001,0.00045000587,0.0011771028,0.008826688,0.007094851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846119,0.007204336,0.0005224802,0.000388129,0.0055072135,0.0017659734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011647526,0.00045307187,0.00082554034,0.0035235675,0.0391755,0.012965436,0.0036122494,0.010269915,0.0025865284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019330982,0.0005361851,0.000762591,0.005442392,0.0276594,0.0032547351,0.0041287476,0.011810198,0.00018379229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023983031,0.000019225476,0.0015530323,0.00017777242,0.000026475145,0.0008813,0.017286135,0.0006539062,0.0002152641,0.8911867,0.066516586,0.021459563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059459922,0.00003318792,0.011366505,0.0019025478,0.00013497125,0.00037597856,0.027010413,0.0008011565,0.00044206693,0.05775436,0.8998678,0.00025161373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99706787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20565124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20565124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33240673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.921332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773375824","doi":"","title":"The Legislative Protection of the Equal Employment Right of Individuals With Criminal Records Based on the International Human Rights Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Human rights; Political science; China; International human rights law; Criminal law","score_opus":0.04330643848592662,"score_gpt":0.30907632415722675,"score_spread":0.2657698856713001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773375824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11402827,0.0029127502,0.01588217,0.05283228,0.0013956575,0.00086273,0.0004743158,0.0002649863,0.8113467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8600337,0.002953518,0.01960912,0.025965724,0.0011421416,0.00095763,0.00049079914,0.00007198318,0.08877534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824906,0.002882911,0.0015561676,0.0022983658,0.0067187315,0.0040531596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912937,0.0023482551,0.001028176,0.0016175101,0.0026697447,0.0010426161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013142925,0.00053241476,0.0007207313,0.0025759633,0.0072739734,0.005604597,0.0022461591,0.005350867,0.0049551795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016287742,0.00062702247,0.0009420162,0.001617975,0.012855048,0.003951838,0.0050869347,0.0066710324,0.00069414405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020048778,0.000093070455,0.0057393597,0.000120240715,0.000018448816,0.00035857692,0.0083436305,0.00026786188,0.0013970778,0.94557405,0.010569666,0.027497943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001694493,0.00031050676,0.074930884,0.002049882,0.00026258966,0.0011196395,0.008999324,0.0023276638,0.0049251835,0.20041801,0.7041416,0.0003452762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077523075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.088269755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077523075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070239035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042485252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15414369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784471017","doi":"","title":"Contiguous Territories: The Expanded Use of Expedited Removal in the Trump Era","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maryland Journal of International Law","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Statutory law; Statute; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Nationality; Immigration","score_opus":0.02908957385473279,"score_gpt":0.3044630830158671,"score_spread":0.27537350916113434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784471017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03926965,0.004263919,0.012065566,0.032100074,0.0004406377,0.000061186605,0.000057489695,0.000121782534,0.9116197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87430274,0.0037063505,0.008137111,0.028575609,0.00080980855,0.00028996458,0.0000646296,0.0001860872,0.08392763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98980635,0.004635438,0.00036586088,0.0011898474,0.0022251976,0.001777171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927434,0.0037726613,0.0005131577,0.0015597502,0.00089648133,0.00051461643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007896903,0.00023300407,0.00033774527,0.001137722,0.007958252,0.009527249,0.0031839255,0.007876569,0.010251436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015631758,0.0005240758,0.00050000666,0.0014112969,0.018231003,0.008608835,0.010382228,0.00783563,0.0012257677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010663107,0.0000123173195,0.00037177373,0.000014077878,0.0000023096748,0.00019830975,0.002419276,0.00015744426,0.00008396459,0.9798321,0.0076639624,0.009233855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004217337,0.00011307262,0.0030080306,0.00082947884,0.000035176734,0.0008208259,0.007236269,0.001626755,0.00043534287,0.28495765,0.70080566,0.00008949687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030622346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.066883475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030622346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004677638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010971787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06088817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784547933","doi":"10.29173/alr1321","title":"Evaluating Canada's New Immigration and Refugee Protection Act in Its Global Context","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Immigration; Refugee; Context (archaeology); Immigration law; Globalization; Political science; Law; Public administration; Refugee law; Geography","score_opus":0.05028816008434897,"score_gpt":0.3508174727034557,"score_spread":0.30052931261910676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784547933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20525797,0.10677731,0.0006134244,0.15285178,0.0026813908,0.00029836933,0.0025364899,0.00008215617,0.5289011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8483199,0.0414999,0.0011430227,0.049328513,0.0006850295,0.000104833554,0.0014649607,0.000048691956,0.05740515],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99154437,0.00083156594,0.00020444712,0.0003472195,0.0041721393,0.0029002563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868535,0.0023110292,0.00040301084,0.00015131786,0.008731012,0.0015501274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060739885,0.00046096698,0.0007247232,0.0056221792,0.012127793,0.011349451,0.0020541453,0.00377326,0.0029529862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010444465,0.0003275565,0.00062175596,0.009586969,0.0061271642,0.0013294708,0.0017767266,0.0031830117,0.00022355701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002352906,0.00021504391,0.062844396,0.0018775595,0.00031535488,0.003019686,0.016037792,0.008612641,0.0008550124,0.3774926,0.42199776,0.106496885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012032766,0.00019898952,0.18991998,0.0015020052,0.0007599643,0.0002815995,0.04403324,0.001594503,0.0008152503,0.010119077,0.7504407,0.00021434692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99657875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1908251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1908251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27113086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9385282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899810747","doi":"","title":"Chapter 12. The Canadian Constitution and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: A Global Template for Minority Rights with Relevance to China?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitution; Charter; China; Relevance (law); Minority rights; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.017041182303086898,"score_gpt":0.2502122848255268,"score_spread":0.23317110252243992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899810747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017173887,0.013313914,0.0006876732,0.0106596965,0.001458213,0.000048311813,0.00034118752,0.000045850804,0.9717278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037164047,0.008180236,0.0011766896,0.004000239,0.00029808245,0.00005121932,0.0002940082,0.000074262374,0.9487612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994855,0.000043712527,0.000007975795,0.00004463019,0.0002782792,0.00013984767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978954,0.000024223162,0.0000066934963,0.000009789825,0.00013296008,0.000036832356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005247371,0.00066200213,0.00024393886,0.0013415458,0.008010857,0.0046585687,0.00084983086,0.001683067,0.0201639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005708971,0.00019638478,0.0002321574,0.0025304144,0.0045700776,0.0019640632,0.0008633409,0.0027776395,0.0028735963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056609024,0.000009807961,0.00016240442,0.000052910105,0.0000011379262,0.000042538555,0.0028482566,0.00008826871,0.000106601,0.7266218,0.24731821,0.022742424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001678125,0.0000021734907,0.0006529823,0.000092776216,0.0000016148363,0.000022397631,0.00082780997,0.00006104185,0.00007357464,0.016911175,0.98134595,0.000006763424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7437833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9044283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2562167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031131374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03978261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5154512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905905336","doi":"10.36646/mjlr.51.4.case","title":"The Case for Effective Environmental Politics: Federalist or Unitary State? Comparing the Cases of Canada, the United States of America, and the People’s Republic of China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Unitary state; Federalism; China; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Public administration; Law; Corporate governance; Economics","score_opus":0.009519139892229538,"score_gpt":0.22034238424181604,"score_spread":0.2108232443495865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905905336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2937778,0.0020891177,0.0044491426,0.1773369,0.00027739452,0.00007666428,0.00007959881,0.000044771637,0.5218685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936134,0.00027539424,0.0003734059,0.0029019779,0.00002666959,0.000016734348,0.000011059441,0.000005934762,0.002775506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936202,0.0018483861,0.00011198215,0.00044961355,0.0011167331,0.0028530746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966698,0.0013332291,0.00031756243,0.00033338738,0.00073427917,0.0006117797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053061116,0.00015660858,0.00034186686,0.0014022085,0.012063034,0.009530373,0.0010905613,0.0035758638,0.0046676276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00923108,0.00019110777,0.00042334525,0.0012277575,0.028747479,0.0059465687,0.00396975,0.0045278193,0.00023358554],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036784902,0.00000754198,0.0008705575,0.000009587495,0.000002582261,0.000047446454,0.0026731654,0.00008948456,0.000033620643,0.9919729,0.0021216837,0.0021677145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009155855,0.000044555993,0.02178553,0.00046515165,0.00008774068,0.00021742674,0.0674573,0.0027209208,0.0008500133,0.7408871,0.16532965,0.00006305721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41230372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5170224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5876963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025071355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044574838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81980765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951574150","doi":"","title":"Protecting the Right to Privacy in Digital Devices: Reasonable Search on Arrest and at the Border","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Warrant; Supreme court; Reasonable suspicion; Law; Political science; Probable cause; Law enforcement; Agency (philosophy); State (computer science); Argument (complex analysis); Enforcement; Charter; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.012769962792165324,"score_gpt":0.30396910491220697,"score_spread":0.29119914212004167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951574150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14251824,0.006548236,0.012517407,0.30777073,0.000833449,0.0001560652,0.0003411535,0.00014839604,0.52916634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9244886,0.002559448,0.0024853218,0.044123832,0.000246295,0.00005569987,0.00007398426,0.000033657554,0.025933014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885421,0.0018855177,0.0004539625,0.0010935413,0.0045104623,0.003514517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894029,0.005867622,0.00064673077,0.00071797625,0.0023242165,0.0010405577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050185514,0.0004568523,0.0005936439,0.0013714867,0.020292537,0.016898025,0.0024052055,0.011458466,0.0039673373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01919233,0.0005904881,0.0008543688,0.0013520123,0.025396964,0.0066110548,0.004893324,0.013337027,0.0006460145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003945834,0.000035902838,0.0039541665,0.00006789577,0.000013892124,0.0015095168,0.013938924,0.00043878824,0.00048357333,0.93626606,0.029332794,0.013918866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018192694,0.0001600667,0.024164425,0.002112649,0.00024500588,0.0025236805,0.057930015,0.004653793,0.0037713724,0.3490511,0.5547597,0.00044627077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84523207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91080165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84523207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035797603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10288089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31135875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998393555","doi":"","title":"The Chiarelli Doctrine: Immigration Exceptionalism and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Charter; Immigration; Persecution; Exceptionalism; Immigration law; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.010517589039680237,"score_gpt":0.30049612645179113,"score_spread":0.2899785374121109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998393555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051793072,0.0044397,0.008047961,0.11065575,0.0005857521,0.000048508504,0.00012386797,0.000068853544,0.82423663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9375777,0.0025057148,0.0036500115,0.01403603,0.00028445764,0.000041842897,0.00006785137,0.00004001815,0.0417964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958835,0.00051178766,0.000073556024,0.00047825996,0.0015902474,0.0014625322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754685,0.00079577486,0.00022510823,0.00017833972,0.00081427133,0.00043966164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003042201,0.00029871648,0.00031471028,0.0017946963,0.025954587,0.0089216195,0.0016699687,0.0036353858,0.0030806006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005734429,0.00024019885,0.00034722695,0.0019865648,0.04344239,0.0034007456,0.0031770908,0.0072510224,0.00021435079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026443404,0.0000017962839,0.00024284216,0.000004623278,5.729574e-7,0.00004020263,0.0031653217,0.000052651136,0.000028043112,0.98953164,0.0045586284,0.0023710318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022447417,0.000017054017,0.006556982,0.000309838,0.0000203123,0.00022176812,0.013059674,0.0013958358,0.00036725833,0.5570922,0.4208465,0.00009023157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9357958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95859224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064204216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05713074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08620005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41451448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014232915","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0043","title":"Treaty Failure or Treaty Constitutionalism? The Problematic Validity of the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Jurisprudence; Federalism; Constitutionalism; Constitution; Presumption; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Reinterpretation; Political science; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Philosophy; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.02510141922362404,"score_gpt":0.22622060910536207,"score_spread":0.20111918988173802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014232915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054356825,0.010637938,0.0038445077,0.3751086,0.0020058006,0.00008437522,0.0005311321,0.00008442899,0.55334634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89137954,0.0037565017,0.0017476435,0.036150537,0.0009483604,0.000092411465,0.00018381001,0.0000928243,0.065648295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98236257,0.0053166896,0.00041900715,0.0019085036,0.0054106815,0.0045825453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905963,0.0037204826,0.00054619554,0.0008058641,0.0036230457,0.0007080939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014528396,0.00041629266,0.00092703156,0.0015341436,0.020749087,0.0144915,0.005499042,0.0075567407,0.009788386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024409164,0.00041615756,0.00077252014,0.0023408674,0.03640089,0.00731011,0.0030460476,0.01161566,0.00077454955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010949525,0.000007272251,0.00049270893,0.000027743134,0.000007673941,0.00009357898,0.003009198,0.00015753301,0.000058973612,0.9789652,0.013100431,0.0040687374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012380518,0.00005099702,0.012203178,0.001244593,0.000097928234,0.00015581459,0.019270843,0.0020521826,0.0007163067,0.4237873,0.5400299,0.00026725524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9677884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96470946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11175648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11175648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11048521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81085384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015879930","doi":"10.1017/s0008423920000256","title":"Public Policy and Constitutional Rights in Times of Crisis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Parliament; Bill of rights; Human rights; Law and economics; Fundamental rights; Scope (computer science); Constitution; Public administration; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.04103138345894193,"score_gpt":0.30099970311706703,"score_spread":0.2599683196581251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015879930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0637019,0.0032503724,0.0052911933,0.20593145,0.0004213945,0.000073386575,0.00018755936,0.00007376766,0.721069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709746,0.0010428262,0.00087545766,0.007410644,0.0002311052,0.000051702693,0.000057447407,0.000038055612,0.019318108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98628277,0.005275446,0.00036804986,0.0010154448,0.0018881678,0.0051702354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889604,0.0062308284,0.00082230155,0.0011466582,0.0015131234,0.0013267143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016497852,0.00020745263,0.00048686087,0.0016573067,0.016308567,0.02006904,0.0015653678,0.0073963907,0.012933968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027906265,0.00040447223,0.0003592695,0.0020333002,0.054429494,0.008018184,0.006437413,0.007373633,0.0006540683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005265518,0.000006550344,0.0002594738,0.000008772981,0.000002087744,0.000043639593,0.0028267696,0.000198164,0.00003864794,0.99083394,0.0030974129,0.002679381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030964547,0.000013252413,0.0025807188,0.00026187953,0.000012783222,0.000060576407,0.016367475,0.00075648836,0.00022058537,0.77412534,0.20553899,0.000030974414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30207068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30932167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30207068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03845582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052392446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60062486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3028193667","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-34324-8_11","title":"Evolving Conceptual and Policy Challenges","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IMISCOE research series","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Conceptual framework; Theme (computing); Political science; Set (abstract data type); Population; Focus (optics); Political economy; Economic geography; Sociology; Geography; Social science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.1958500621130574,"score_gpt":0.4093292570540123,"score_spread":0.2134791949409549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3028193667","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009219069,0.024223465,0.010665579,0.6363382,0.004349193,0.000051426126,0.00010624732,0.00006232154,0.31498447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6384545,0.042343136,0.023632787,0.14415187,0.008209003,0.00083961344,0.00048396803,0.00033021776,0.14155495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98637134,0.008754036,0.0003154994,0.0012962681,0.0022872428,0.0009755683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909792,0.0064836126,0.00029787817,0.0005222341,0.0011303987,0.0005865922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018060822,0.0008058958,0.0009243895,0.0026038291,0.008726798,0.023287276,0.003531942,0.010849605,0.010020891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013859563,0.0005693278,0.0006533487,0.0035030325,0.040632557,0.022708265,0.009322961,0.017551977,0.0013550526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010035445,0.000006565123,0.0000181027,0.000016493075,8.878313e-7,0.000024988372,0.0019072631,0.00010191518,0.000012070446,0.9894601,0.0064188894,0.0020315908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004487276,0.000007817109,0.00009051152,0.00043404324,0.0000019620102,0.000074329306,0.014708007,0.00053327676,0.00004284454,0.7177548,0.26633584,0.0000121551675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069935718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061185462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023287276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019217448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010422002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13943297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123962051","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the Application of Section 7 of the Charter in Immigration and Refugee Protection","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Refugee; Political science; Supreme court; Statute; Law; Statutory law; Charter; Immigration reform; Immigration detention; Immigration law; Context (archaeology); Immigration","score_opus":0.010306339737225036,"score_gpt":0.2741875309680102,"score_spread":0.26388119123078513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123962051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054121096,0.0036449083,0.022335032,0.2424109,0.0072881305,0.00043580448,0.00079778215,0.00043116984,0.6685351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5670352,0.0028762165,0.02840506,0.24870688,0.002482236,0.00041622823,0.00046137124,0.00022547408,0.14939131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97097194,0.0045858175,0.0013869944,0.0024265682,0.011951611,0.0086770775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97646254,0.010138924,0.00085802504,0.0012455364,0.009965821,0.0013290772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022575233,0.0006352972,0.0009324338,0.0017672596,0.014246165,0.012731354,0.005099799,0.017168017,0.0036937268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025425315,0.0010091249,0.001852316,0.0014592988,0.018610999,0.0038557737,0.0042192508,0.025497727,0.0012401515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013500954,0.000019160016,0.00081232586,0.000029126675,0.0000082715,0.00023789478,0.0036902006,0.00046352492,0.00035648243,0.9433122,0.04583629,0.0052210153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008567522,0.00017327219,0.010590261,0.0013988191,0.00012419489,0.00038599438,0.00815532,0.003915147,0.0021817898,0.20552471,0.76705545,0.0004093828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88851076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92968065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11148924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058261726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19124469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42272037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124333424","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2959","title":"As Good as it Gets? Security, Asylum, and the Rule of Law after the Certificate Trilogy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Principle of legality; Certificate; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Nexus (standard); Computer security; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02795184648206109,"score_gpt":0.28835343266763386,"score_spread":0.26040158618557274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124333424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16738057,0.0061053033,0.009644089,0.31206146,0.0013795069,0.000069268994,0.00030529234,0.00016614643,0.50288844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9451959,0.0012066074,0.0010949384,0.009881144,0.000116308525,0.0000123189975,0.000038768452,0.00003235095,0.042421617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946772,0.0008045923,0.000090252346,0.0004977221,0.001582441,0.0023477278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973442,0.0008137566,0.00018690039,0.00019405858,0.0009304202,0.0005306795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004003494,0.00026168211,0.00030291794,0.00071486516,0.019778881,0.010016458,0.0015847877,0.0036305494,0.0036807745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010012394,0.00019244647,0.00030534106,0.0009856838,0.033168912,0.0036071984,0.0030535518,0.007312584,0.0003732259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011705955,0.000006202471,0.001108564,0.000013971487,0.0000025833244,0.00012466125,0.009212995,0.0001942938,0.00011208652,0.96742666,0.012684037,0.009102148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040706378,0.00005657944,0.012730688,0.00052678346,0.000052213818,0.00025148274,0.046324674,0.0015055791,0.001407215,0.2809693,0.6559689,0.00016583597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9611596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9683539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06106925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06106925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12280363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4430905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147535569","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6265-431-0_14","title":"Urbanization, Megacities, Constitutional Silence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"European yearbook of constitutional law","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Megacity; Urbanization; Geopolitics; Silence; Geography; Economic geography; Population; Urban agglomeration; Development economics; Political science; Economy; Economic growth; Sociology; Demography; Economics; Politics; Art; Law","score_opus":0.025119789458979348,"score_gpt":0.24172175971863438,"score_spread":0.21660197025965502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147535569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009522418,0.013472729,0.0005295833,0.011317927,0.00023182847,0.000015444704,0.00013994204,0.00003815229,0.9647319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61429566,0.02363177,0.00060996483,0.0035098158,0.0006787963,0.00010805153,0.00039849748,0.0001262853,0.35664114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961686,0.000115934454,0.000010651539,0.000075296164,0.00010679985,0.00007449541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999713,0.00012398465,0.00003943628,0.000041019757,0.000045440687,0.00003712834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044545892,0.00026945653,0.00016187562,0.0010466409,0.004229679,0.0059086517,0.0006435816,0.0010739323,0.01730379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009934925,0.00016684708,0.00009077158,0.0033493584,0.007960847,0.004345925,0.0030791014,0.0016902568,0.0018511199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011752458,0.0000031952643,0.000068339665,0.000019186733,5.67875e-7,0.00002869265,0.001445342,0.000079156714,0.000016847878,0.9786537,0.014302638,0.0053811343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003930913,0.00000643074,0.0011338927,0.00012824676,0.0000028305742,0.00006908899,0.004319032,0.00010952048,0.00008268333,0.16319877,0.83094084,0.000004671637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017410673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037871007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017410673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044998406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026854812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057886958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200149901","doi":"10.1093/ijrl/eeab034","title":"Canadian Exclusion Jurisprudence post-<i>Febles</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Refugee Law","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Supreme court; Tribunal; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Immigration; Immigration law; Legitimacy; Refugee law; Citizenship; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.009279386059874866,"score_gpt":0.3034960275812762,"score_spread":0.2942166415214013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200149901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07594024,0.015901119,0.0035994789,0.15614627,0.0017994244,0.00012630816,0.0005969076,0.00013012848,0.7457601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78926283,0.0044152252,0.002415366,0.05240245,0.000669982,0.00007340331,0.00019630972,0.0001415037,0.15042295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98709065,0.0013080585,0.00029582102,0.0016028227,0.0059437444,0.0037589506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99109405,0.0027195704,0.0003996566,0.00031894198,0.0042249686,0.0012428601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007275402,0.00043892587,0.00083831884,0.0030928717,0.04399546,0.01951345,0.0032773302,0.0071532694,0.007998832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011347449,0.0005259286,0.0008959075,0.002813117,0.033010352,0.002545421,0.004611478,0.010683346,0.00046471134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025996402,0.000016828071,0.0010928895,0.00006126533,0.00001252455,0.0004134446,0.015183118,0.0002596599,0.00027500297,0.9293616,0.045520402,0.0077772746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028813565,0.000026556405,0.008985232,0.0005038761,0.00004978718,0.00016328698,0.011923142,0.00073788513,0.0005791319,0.044987597,0.9318146,0.0002001489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99362373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99544394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22659738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22659738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22045197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8970374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287109501","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.5138023","title":"COVID-19 Immunity Certificates (Passports) as an Intergovernmental problem in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Virology; Political science; Business; Medicine; Outbreak","score_opus":0.04336311914585636,"score_gpt":0.27899174764772205,"score_spread":0.2356286285018657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287109501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11208004,0.0032455106,0.008771339,0.2713077,0.0015492903,0.00029185312,0.0006214057,0.00017962606,0.60195327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84128845,0.0016974917,0.004127927,0.037085004,0.00024982856,0.00009071597,0.00022003896,0.000089268426,0.11515137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98383915,0.0016992324,0.00046367745,0.0014211199,0.006002321,0.006574442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846234,0.0046573556,0.0010466481,0.00086973317,0.0055240393,0.0032787893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008449905,0.00039762683,0.00054125657,0.0011960143,0.024485435,0.014385879,0.0029618472,0.009615281,0.00838728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019409286,0.00061158475,0.0010072356,0.0021167628,0.012550303,0.0039009412,0.004843812,0.0110804755,0.00046304078],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019540714,0.00003178693,0.0038340571,0.00003734078,0.000016878128,0.0007871492,0.003443503,0.0013693619,0.0002228675,0.9414657,0.039507728,0.009264069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009193565,0.000053428852,0.021300677,0.00051716,0.000094369025,0.000528568,0.020762831,0.0065763257,0.0014459847,0.10748635,0.84080017,0.0003423034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98992133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14948502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14948502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32660148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98647684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386139525","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197676189.003.0011","title":"Non-centralized Coordination during a Transboundary Crisis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Intergovernmentalism; Negotiation; Political science; Commission; Collective action; Member states; European union; Public administration; Action (physics); European commission; Business; International trade; Law","score_opus":0.025602210145663464,"score_gpt":0.2769917447660067,"score_spread":0.25138953462034325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386139525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0800031,0.0024405464,0.012381937,0.03373533,0.0005659184,0.00006259494,0.000037320548,0.00010424618,0.8706691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8941035,0.0014279197,0.0023207217,0.0025116988,0.0001631349,0.000066556175,0.00003734232,0.00006189175,0.0993071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985098,0.0007459199,0.000026893082,0.00018482316,0.0002395693,0.00029293945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988594,0.00049672445,0.00010566307,0.0001452985,0.0001851054,0.00020783099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002808215,0.00016592673,0.00025040153,0.00052517396,0.0049969233,0.0060872226,0.00086190534,0.0018425883,0.0074917343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019427098,0.00018658,0.0002054174,0.0008935644,0.009032107,0.005177487,0.005040799,0.0031266732,0.0006502269],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015875721,0.00002452683,0.00022778222,0.000033838212,0.0000029695059,0.00024337503,0.01727192,0.0016594393,0.00025757847,0.94925165,0.017477233,0.013533724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028306735,0.000030392332,0.0025725113,0.0002953853,0.0000059131057,0.00015482753,0.03739159,0.005042341,0.00046804722,0.4970793,0.45691076,0.000020612018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017266583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023927325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017266583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009378474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006424991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068045914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387245589","doi":"10.32920/24233101","title":"As Good as it Gets? Security, Asylum, and the Rule of Law after the Certificate Trilogy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Principle of legality; Certificate; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Waiver; Nexus (standard); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06673125998442891,"score_gpt":0.3330765059575456,"score_spread":0.2663452459731167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387245589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1563135,0.0067890207,0.006108097,0.3433851,0.0011394239,0.000059537168,0.00036154763,0.00012173076,0.48572215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9451878,0.0013703965,0.0009124221,0.009294102,0.00009900211,0.000010809024,0.000041264397,0.000029250432,0.04305489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954194,0.00073197373,0.000069850386,0.00042811525,0.0012894791,0.0020611377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769175,0.0007186792,0.00017776854,0.0001507264,0.0007793986,0.00048167814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003196566,0.0002383687,0.000267324,0.0006614916,0.019105833,0.010353401,0.0013315515,0.0032181342,0.004295909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008831075,0.00017992349,0.00026959248,0.0009978557,0.030037463,0.0031127364,0.002634356,0.0063246707,0.00036953326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013051799,0.0000070709966,0.0014199335,0.000016335129,0.00000294322,0.00012247259,0.0099836085,0.00021728058,0.000111310685,0.9600187,0.017802093,0.010285155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042036856,0.00004645288,0.017963106,0.00052184437,0.000052508247,0.00020808216,0.05373436,0.0017834647,0.0014858946,0.27857167,0.6454378,0.00015283562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9751433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9788886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9751433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07233724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12247847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52484584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387246063","doi":"10.32920/24233101.v1","title":"As Good as it Gets? Security, Asylum, and the Rule of Law after the Certificate Trilogy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Certificate; Principle of legality; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Nexus (standard); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06673125998442891,"score_gpt":0.3330765059575456,"score_spread":0.2663452459731167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387246063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1563135,0.0067890207,0.006108097,0.3433851,0.0011394239,0.000059537168,0.00036154763,0.00012173076,0.48572215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9451878,0.0013703965,0.0009124221,0.009294102,0.00009900211,0.000010809024,0.000041264397,0.000029250432,0.04305489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954194,0.00073197373,0.000069850386,0.00042811525,0.0012894791,0.0020611377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769175,0.0007186792,0.00017776854,0.0001507264,0.0007793986,0.00048167814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003196566,0.0002383687,0.000267324,0.0006614916,0.019105833,0.010353401,0.0013315515,0.0032181342,0.004295909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008831075,0.00017992349,0.00026959248,0.0009978557,0.030037463,0.0031127364,0.002634356,0.0063246707,0.00036953326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013051799,0.0000070709966,0.0014199335,0.000016335129,0.00000294322,0.00012247259,0.0099836085,0.00021728058,0.000111310685,0.9600187,0.017802093,0.010285155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042036856,0.00004645288,0.017963106,0.00052184437,0.000052508247,0.00020808216,0.05373436,0.0017834647,0.0014858946,0.27857167,0.6454378,0.00015283562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9751433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9788886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9751433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07233724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12247847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52484584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397033941","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54354-8_10","title":"Call It Democracy: The Slippage Amongst Rights, Laws, and Values in Canada During the Pandemic Era","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave socio-legal studies","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Slippage; Democracy; Pandemic; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Law; Medicine; Economics; Internal medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.021509271414794893,"score_gpt":0.27030631946100625,"score_spread":0.24879704804621136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397033941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16937856,0.011256037,0.001034327,0.280026,0.0018514978,0.00012881415,0.0006763844,0.00008609521,0.5355623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8147401,0.00470771,0.00060136523,0.019732824,0.00016027682,0.00005048536,0.00015369988,0.000112909045,0.15974069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942213,0.00062859844,0.00004891999,0.00027405418,0.0011736163,0.0036535661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963407,0.0006245196,0.00019657153,0.00010556724,0.0010000307,0.0017325381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028628064,0.00037682592,0.00044148264,0.0011685531,0.05077142,0.015920632,0.001786465,0.00445941,0.010818699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007400982,0.0003775087,0.00032379624,0.0035694558,0.026799804,0.004478148,0.0062572467,0.009379972,0.0006837418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005367818,0.00004448906,0.010949688,0.00007801173,0.000017977245,0.0006859058,0.30560914,0.00046834367,0.00024587865,0.3917193,0.23002633,0.06010122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012604611,0.000013961308,0.017002242,0.00026846287,0.0000136750905,0.00015675586,0.24010813,0.00027614844,0.00016167214,0.020542571,0.7213794,0.00006435506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99685574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17427884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17427884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39315933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9577195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401420862","doi":"10.69970/gjlhd.v11i1.1250","title":"The Canadian Residential School System: An International Law Failure","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith journal of law and human dignity.","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.026983564223410375,"score_gpt":0.304515531010249,"score_spread":0.2775319667868386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401420862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046868067,0.009516579,0.001047776,0.27559537,0.0008618639,0.00009366581,0.00045739254,0.0001530814,0.66540617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7228135,0.008849564,0.0016988511,0.05901676,0.0003579358,0.00010112993,0.00032091982,0.00022777596,0.20661366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98677945,0.0010136615,0.00022419049,0.0012608797,0.005054189,0.005667575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99127144,0.0009509553,0.00028238207,0.00037127765,0.0047034803,0.002420455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058240723,0.00059072877,0.00054858014,0.0027582715,0.052227363,0.017202366,0.004704171,0.0058528595,0.013780523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011092384,0.00067417126,0.00056685624,0.004679088,0.021845056,0.0048733964,0.0057886764,0.009944983,0.00093589263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017124581,0.00003951383,0.0034850375,0.00006320052,0.000013696582,0.0003453026,0.02314031,0.00021819207,0.00011085384,0.7978788,0.14113541,0.03355264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018874436,0.000018401235,0.014099331,0.000354449,0.00004452596,0.00011900797,0.042736825,0.00035582998,0.00023980644,0.019405901,0.92250896,0.00009812827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7716435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22835651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37925133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89499706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414326927","doi":"10.32920/30158056","title":"Persistent Discord: The Adjudication of National Security Deportation Cases in Canada (2018–2020)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Adjudication; Terrorism; Tribunal; National security; Abandonment (legal); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.025342603151918816,"score_gpt":0.2965493266795638,"score_spread":0.27120672352764497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414326927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9505117,0.0015378123,0.00050315587,0.015179133,0.00014767762,0.00027516054,0.002118741,0.00005356733,0.029673086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845745,0.000834132,0.0005501282,0.002837292,0.000037849913,0.00005893909,0.0008800495,0.000025923593,0.01020121],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98305476,0.0013138368,0.00063269195,0.0012742223,0.009503136,0.004221369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9479807,0.009518583,0.009266513,0.0021953422,0.02511908,0.0059197196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008195325,0.00024581392,0.00039348085,0.0057659345,0.019731123,0.006494091,0.0034276685,0.0023199453,0.001819109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03973925,0.00058134785,0.0003000889,0.009380202,0.005598044,0.0016732018,0.0047759274,0.004405428,0.00033725987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029117498,0.00026514867,0.6361543,0.00028605064,0.000106090476,0.0054908236,0.1764275,0.0012038824,0.0017564119,0.017949758,0.07415837,0.085910514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025241232,0.00006453127,0.7255461,0.0002976469,0.000073637726,0.0007353138,0.16526505,0.0016874234,0.0017067911,0.0011034831,0.103336535,0.00015818239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99295384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13363464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13363464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12769179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96959174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W642609930","doi":"","title":"Human rights and the effluxion of time; Canada's Chinese immigration act as illustrative of the need for judicial remedies for human rights violations of the distant past","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Durham e-Theses (Durham University)","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Durham University; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Legislature; Law; Underpinning; Fundamental rights; Immigration; International human rights law; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.007013365171991841,"score_gpt":0.2660902635182155,"score_spread":0.25907689834622366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W642609930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06684115,0.013534025,0.0011509134,0.16003437,0.0018981524,0.00013276633,0.00044118153,0.00010406747,0.75586337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63580686,0.0048994175,0.001337345,0.0638071,0.0004156979,0.00008479003,0.00008304924,0.000035714675,0.29353002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967878,0.00041313094,0.00007128171,0.00030394117,0.0011756195,0.0012482294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981844,0.0005624975,0.00012434502,0.00009248429,0.0005096029,0.0005266142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015028993,0.0004631988,0.00022013085,0.0011600493,0.021921534,0.00870875,0.0014435209,0.007884315,0.004725058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032953592,0.00032984157,0.0004716244,0.0014487498,0.018560315,0.0016866167,0.0018071935,0.0063933777,0.0004012922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019791654,0.000018442433,0.0023399757,0.000058429334,0.000008099861,0.0011887356,0.007352853,0.00036086998,0.0004460997,0.8774061,0.1006174,0.010183165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005227219,0.000043447224,0.019879235,0.0004148215,0.000060202572,0.00047996943,0.016957704,0.001269835,0.0011426068,0.0528548,0.9066414,0.00020360906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9819484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06358888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06358888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13879104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46137178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008388210","doi":"","title":"Catherine Dauvergne, Humanitarianism, Identity and Nation : Migration Laws in Canada and Australia, Vancouver, UBC Press, 2005","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Persée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche)","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); National identity; Immigration; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.061717080705489404,"score_gpt":0.33397905710970555,"score_spread":0.2722619764042161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008388210","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024181865,0.7960251,0.0007460913,0.100619644,0.0029018833,0.0000528986,0.0014986307,0.000079663856,0.09565801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057471316,0.70779675,0.0017114294,0.0128844725,0.0016502034,0.00010300227,0.00084259553,0.0001451075,0.21739516],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908185,0.0001807065,0.000050667026,0.00007157391,0.0004478011,0.00016746907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975642,0.0006903209,0.00022966028,0.000046625264,0.0010543115,0.00041489248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009971685,0.0010587772,0.00052340387,0.003910592,0.0078057777,0.0056599863,0.0018535145,0.00367287,0.021672871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023197124,0.00065976236,0.00029545528,0.00938827,0.0037705493,0.004388116,0.0014129572,0.0035320325,0.0037808698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013983789,0.000017129994,0.0008051015,0.00030531536,0.000009145447,0.00012582146,0.0058584474,0.00013054832,0.000044434415,0.012619858,0.9301193,0.049951073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009877847,0.0000055202786,0.01318181,0.0012722367,0.000015440482,0.00017949671,0.011774742,0.000093213355,0.0001576692,0.0046196184,0.96864945,0.000040829735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9385464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97978586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06145358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02173119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031750888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15767157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113484492","doi":"","title":"A Roof Over Our Heads: Rights Or Real Estate?","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Right of way; Right to the city; Poverty; International human rights law","score_opus":0.027476273721721803,"score_gpt":0.3125509028945303,"score_spread":0.2850746291728085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113484492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017933346,0.0055267615,0.0014589453,0.46173885,0.002852139,0.00001434754,0.0000920866,0.000043588287,0.51034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63280183,0.0053055794,0.00059429667,0.088636704,0.0013002582,0.00003404476,0.00008629863,0.00009927494,0.2711417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753606,0.0008212587,0.000048733455,0.00022226608,0.0004463782,0.0009252003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822813,0.00035818538,0.00014921887,0.00017450411,0.00037771766,0.00071230583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022557857,0.00023249589,0.00027050468,0.00044032288,0.010743218,0.0088861715,0.0011603212,0.0042296327,0.02517496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005014736,0.00019677915,0.00020848474,0.00056671497,0.027871167,0.012723043,0.0043283137,0.005888824,0.0028371408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011638363,0.000017359409,0.00095360965,0.000019518415,0.0000020731413,0.00019576288,0.015547536,0.000023383132,0.00007574964,0.7792216,0.18724623,0.016685577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074282884,0.0000124302,0.0010694925,0.00020131393,0.0000034084446,0.00020571015,0.057177905,0.000038208193,0.0001147341,0.04495245,0.896201,0.000015893933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11954164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18560103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11954164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049546957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007996088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23769164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139604900","doi":"","title":"Kansalliset intressit Yhdysvaltain Kiina-politiikassa. Retorinen tutkimusYhdysvaltain harjoittaman engagement-politiikan suhteesta maan kansallisiin intresseihin","year":2000,"lang":"fi","type":"dissertation","venue":"Trepo - Institutional Repository of Tampere University","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Spare time; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.017034672462206482,"score_gpt":0.25585208369378515,"score_spread":0.23881741123157868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139604900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057496037,0.004611081,0.004261227,0.02497995,0.00138131,0.00014004188,0.00077007915,0.00010716852,0.90625304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36418638,0.0027695952,0.001538253,0.004340276,0.0003105995,0.00022185165,0.0007430901,0.00018644014,0.6257036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749905,0.00049420056,0.000109543784,0.0004991013,0.00077136955,0.00062672474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743575,0.0009488899,0.000326461,0.00021516992,0.0006474429,0.00042624693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024057145,0.00055248337,0.00034926742,0.0008160632,0.0045261774,0.009125064,0.0007980517,0.0022682738,0.06468859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004614808,0.0003283319,0.000539475,0.0015624779,0.0021632316,0.0050034476,0.0045935563,0.0056098504,0.010274594],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003344326,0.00026315197,0.01422512,0.0005285098,0.000059391354,0.0009638518,0.037243158,0.00024832785,0.0029134604,0.7540435,0.092375614,0.096801445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025528696,0.000070144924,0.015608929,0.0002609157,0.00003501917,0.00017362591,0.012861995,0.00013836012,0.0022347341,0.019913089,0.9486492,0.000028453147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013266758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033093683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06468859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063520875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057250736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21640491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}