{"meta":{"query_hash":"e1e2db0870d4","filters":{"topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights"},"cohort_total":36,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":36,"exported":36,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e1e2db0870d4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Immigration+Law+and+Human+Rights"},"results":[{"id":"W1569131746","doi":"10.3968/5232","title":"Several Thoughts on Promoting the Modernization of National Governance Capacity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in sociology of science","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Modernization theory; Corporate governance; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Process (computing); Public administration; Economic system; Business; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.0897633650759647,"score_gpt":0.3840431328598111,"score_spread":0.2942797677838464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569131746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98874867,0.000052583822,0.000100843645,0.0014376605,0.00035498652,0.000100513316,0.000001780277,0.000006916503,0.0091960365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992661,0.000041986932,0.00019398727,0.00012765659,0.00015801776,0.000005477776,1.8065367e-7,0.0000012069789,0.00020537621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998889,0.00019636095,0.00017086692,0.00014263699,0.00044986795,0.00015121255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989866,0.0003737786,0.00018869234,0.000067175446,0.00037189477,0.0000118763655],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027028176,0.000045233086,0.000117525204,0.000029446966,0.00089007284,0.0000031136697,0.0002963393,0.00003591715,0.000004029643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013781552,0.000029551673,0.000020803143,0.00019507707,0.03368058,0.00015400539,0.000039396677,0.00007835738,0.0000017538646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022308816,0.000016593489,0.0008976551,0.000004829873,0.0000031847608,3.186979e-8,0.28377858,0.00031847376,0.00013686783,0.7146946,0.0000837846,0.000063147585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046308537,0.00020397572,0.06833531,0.00012274057,0.000006809461,6.102589e-7,0.06390948,0.0032468291,0.0037848256,0.85721403,0.0024981704,0.00021410752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008098627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063882844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2198691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010726316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014183116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9689492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608947772","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1269","title":"Moore v. British Columbia: A Good IDEA?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Remedial education; Political science; Public administration; Tribunal; School choice; Law; Human rights; Voucher; Legislature; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.019144626844349838,"score_gpt":0.27458372708350964,"score_spread":0.25543910023915983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608947772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021819174,0.10857865,0.000038787217,0.014130041,0.00091956294,0.003776082,0.000031775144,0.00047879643,0.8502271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73628265,0.07124463,0.00047824354,0.018996216,0.0010607182,0.0005429168,0.00006466647,0.00005498001,0.17127497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983679,0.00022676888,0.0003378409,0.0002557864,0.00044178782,0.00036989222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991132,0.000045413923,0.0001010817,0.00026066622,0.00030126426,0.00017834477],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005609564,0.000093053146,0.00031613,0.00000770621,0.0009560228,0.000737839,0.00033907342,0.000085847656,0.026961131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006586147,0.00011963255,0.00015157915,0.00015755072,0.0003130908,0.00052769016,0.000033448316,0.00013052666,0.0021488122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.9565023e-7,0.000046318113,0.00037967946,0.0003674322,0.0000189871,0.000007909603,0.0003004907,3.5273743e-8,0.000003398399,0.49670455,0.4954445,0.0067264885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009787571,0.000014990961,0.0009985109,0.0011243699,0.000035915265,0.0000042334705,0.0000418784,9.268932e-7,8.695145e-7,0.015884811,0.98162353,0.00017211429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2629363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7437476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7144635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000597495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013098236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1748374369","doi":"","title":"Comprehensive Immigration Reform(s): Immigration Regulation Beyond Our Borders","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration law; Immigration reform; Immigration policy; Political science; Legislature; Enforcement; German; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.01390077885830982,"score_gpt":0.29535965657875846,"score_spread":0.28145887772044864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1748374369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2662394,0.000051159983,0.030489203,0.024555946,0.0010217937,0.00084306375,0.000004206127,0.0005789488,0.67621624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714354,0.000024700823,0.0006395641,0.0006159299,0.0005694551,0.000018339864,0.00010440141,0.000011989232,0.026580177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984592,0.00024762118,0.00029647193,0.0002574232,0.0004671629,0.0002720826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991721,0.0000379906,0.00014779823,0.00020927227,0.00033259022,0.00010023017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004100201,0.00013711966,0.00014812613,0.00012021197,0.0011517558,0.0001729832,0.00014406526,0.00014510578,0.000281024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002321949,0.00011630699,0.000080542,0.0002146447,0.000091701564,0.00079986884,0.000012898575,0.000091373644,0.00030016812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015535405,0.000026769912,0.00011114762,0.0000051717166,0.000009160605,1.6631661e-7,0.007649117,0.000028343939,0.0010569665,0.9725748,0.01354595,0.0049769212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007025979,0.00013663097,0.015320409,0.00001546403,0.000030674433,9.764748e-7,0.03778594,0.0041735736,0.002625985,0.068240106,0.87047505,0.0004926018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009959178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046729397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90433466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018717525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009075758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065721359","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v1n2p12","title":"Selecting a Mode of Way to the Regional Rule of Law at Present China","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Promotion (chess); China; Law; Mode (computer interface); Autonomy; Chinese law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public law; Law and economics; Municipal law; Sociology; Computer science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030108484456659607,"score_gpt":0.305636676771135,"score_spread":0.2755281923144754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065721359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95764625,0.00009806219,0.000027028935,0.003221691,0.00007001369,0.000043899305,0.0000040654813,0.0000014944927,0.038887523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996749,0.000034804714,0.00013531135,0.00026297988,0.00032573793,2.6397436e-7,2.2095901e-7,0.0000025332056,0.0024891535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929076,0.000056377557,0.00021839104,0.000036123874,0.000280069,0.00011825458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948585,0.00006212914,0.00016993722,0.000046903184,0.00015632286,0.00007885524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021621768,0.000036681366,0.000111405585,0.000021419897,0.00051888626,0.0000118146045,0.000095250616,0.000025627665,0.000030001951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000141579485,0.000022548462,0.000055942885,0.000033954682,0.0002919688,0.00007004639,0.000016008931,0.00006430767,6.412817e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007090397,0.000025285144,0.00012037952,0.0000045149336,0.00001261862,0.0000016925179,0.020570016,0.000041971198,0.000107620785,0.97763723,0.0014605559,0.000011022452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005186624,0.00029321606,0.0063971835,0.000081698374,0.00004507632,0.00008775523,0.0011672169,0.00010249935,0.0064010355,0.13103783,0.85373443,0.0001334122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060965093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00587341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8522739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027426784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006472358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92161393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204045736","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2673543","title":"As Good as it Gets? Security, Asylum, and the Rule of Law after the Certificate Trilogy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Rule of law; Law; Certificate; Political science; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.026527175914029383,"score_gpt":0.29472025961944365,"score_spread":0.2681930837054143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2204045736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7530611,0.007832348,0.000059933765,0.072713085,0.00041609624,0.00036318443,0.0000022138083,0.000022414197,0.16552962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98765665,0.0012193711,0.0000024758494,0.00089299335,0.00038227005,0.000008278798,5.6563204e-7,0.0000075067373,0.00982989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789196,0.00050350657,0.00023797336,0.00011373761,0.00039700902,0.0008558076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993486,0.00011733316,0.00016249632,0.00013787032,0.00014703677,0.00008669869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039219446,0.000089779904,0.00015857333,0.000028393368,0.00075984775,0.00014125618,0.00033922266,0.00007208432,0.00013084874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007038347,0.00004598025,0.0000877725,0.00006201341,0.00091787963,0.00019200398,0.000034026234,0.00073340227,0.00007371171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019037435,0.000021363814,0.000040661365,8.4643176e-7,0.000049097347,0.0000015393,0.028943425,4.9707694e-7,0.0000041716944,0.9702199,0.00017553783,0.0003526006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000697876,0.00010537242,0.00004135375,0.0000039872275,0.000035607034,0.000060062233,0.006599282,0.000003990033,0.000044257224,0.801346,0.19100276,0.000059437953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004973146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.080113895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23459555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016357396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015070316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9366716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2351366877","doi":"","title":"The Research on Immigration Laws in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force Academy","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration law; China; Work (physics); Law; Political science; Immigration policy; Order (exchange); Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02699917582851571,"score_gpt":0.36814110740921474,"score_spread":0.34114193158069905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2351366877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8792879,0.00010726885,0.0000013756106,0.113641545,0.00036933905,0.00020007468,0.0000018047867,0.00000450211,0.0063862014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915827,0.00031341772,0.000005099835,0.0022924752,0.0011480256,0.0000034210138,3.6150408e-7,0.000007066901,0.004647432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968178,0.00073536014,0.0004920022,0.00010894297,0.0013558738,0.0004899763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983429,0.0008292281,0.00033857126,0.00015802907,0.00018716187,0.0001441603],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027088514,0.0001195345,0.0001909452,0.0001478977,0.0016761086,0.00012896255,0.0010717154,0.00009612229,0.000028179438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003378495,0.00005664806,0.000114962124,0.0009724386,0.00013700653,0.00030963199,0.000031022268,0.0011010361,0.000009322527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005479804,0.00020009874,0.024023538,0.00001223237,0.000066611734,0.000008608831,0.1607044,0.00205193,0.0009224348,0.67816293,0.12667559,0.0066236085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088708376,0.00014887455,0.728598,0.000109664055,0.000016305,0.00001751788,0.013014859,0.00018530566,0.00041646982,0.08066724,0.17569433,0.0002443407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7219995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70457447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085806416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016435855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2372206402","doi":"","title":"Reflections on Equal Protection to Public and Non-public Economy in the Criminal Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PROTO Manufacturing (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Legislation; Socialist market economy; Principal (computer security); Criminal law; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Socialism; Political science; Public law; Social economy; Economics; China; Politics","score_opus":0.21103500135389122,"score_gpt":0.3609294467969373,"score_spread":0.14989444544304606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2372206402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11701502,0.0000011131659,0.0010110151,0.006818294,0.00008817487,0.00036928448,3.6655047e-7,0.00003284708,0.8746639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994868,7.1836365e-7,0.000116017654,0.0021268039,0.00012379137,0.00009798153,6.6975184e-7,0.000002614819,0.0026634282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993984,0.00012167299,0.00009462106,0.00012834203,0.00009165087,0.00016532933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997596,0.000023784374,0.00002123414,0.000086280095,0.000049193615,0.00005989648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005074679,0.000048421825,0.000046461864,0.000095929485,0.0008461172,0.00021667844,0.00011303025,0.000042178697,0.00048406448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002036867,0.000032164528,0.000016362996,0.00014387303,0.00011196636,0.000389201,0.000009549593,0.000085737905,0.00009782784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003974842,0.000044415625,0.000027183605,9.515842e-7,0.0000014364417,2.9593645e-7,0.03302001,5.5696688e-8,0.0000069637085,0.9661734,0.00022326225,0.0004980316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028255122,0.00046235608,0.005637399,0.000006096689,0.0000074244986,0.000002286283,0.02769627,0.00001475926,0.00027227006,0.1537818,0.81161964,0.00021712366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010045487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32715863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.877853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044341134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006249863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513284339","doi":"","title":"Bridging the global divide on human rights : a Canada-China dialogue","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Right to property; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; Law; Linguistic rights; Chinese law; International law; Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women; Municipal law","score_opus":0.0210295341026237,"score_gpt":0.2802699208260878,"score_spread":0.2592403867234641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513284339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005073168,0.000044142344,0.000038149083,0.00200561,0.0009927762,0.00037964652,0.000052869484,0.00007454263,0.9959049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.086787,0.0000028480772,0.0000037871152,0.0013955382,0.0014810083,0.000010040866,0.00007221254,0.000012410273,0.91023517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978069,0.0002401845,0.00026655386,0.00034450865,0.0009023144,0.00043953236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992012,0.00008255501,0.00015916422,0.00033857775,0.00006909601,0.00014940772],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036176993,0.0002690855,0.00026290872,0.00003082895,0.004469123,0.00023342141,0.0005464629,0.00021181889,0.0018540199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016898459,0.00016486307,0.00013046814,0.00006619532,0.00035779364,0.00007744796,0.000026596335,0.00030928312,0.000115454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.5768787e-7,0.0000055712785,0.0000065277104,0.0000016662514,0.000014676791,0.00001023154,0.00039003452,0.0000010836536,1.38653355e-8,0.5789188,0.42058647,0.00006419027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065504035,0.0000123972495,0.00021888611,0.000027659058,0.000022650702,5.6956924e-7,0.000011023239,4.4968255e-7,0.0000013385484,0.26338625,0.73605436,0.00019889101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9229775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31553254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001577375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029296784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520308867","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the Best Interests of the Child Principle","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Best interests; Supreme court; Expansive; Citizenship; Statutory law; Political science; Law; Immigration; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Residence; Child support; Child custody; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.01193591445684604,"score_gpt":0.2843986646056423,"score_spread":0.27246275014879623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520308867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93232965,0.0010612084,0.0006425417,0.037459012,0.00038339608,0.00017365202,0.0000011468965,0.000014820623,0.027934588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870279,0.0007280971,0.0000028673546,0.00007904107,0.00093656604,0.0000011862876,5.5022678e-8,0.0000048957972,0.011219401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985243,0.00022510531,0.00017815207,0.0000681384,0.00026524396,0.000739056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994972,0.00007466199,0.00018845407,0.0001314294,0.000081289814,0.000027015503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019120253,0.000053127602,0.000068262234,0.000019170006,0.0012554162,0.000043297114,0.00046948832,0.000030771727,0.00009072691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013408817,0.000020087782,0.00009710409,0.00008436856,0.00022780985,0.00013664497,0.000031165873,0.00046341564,0.000025677518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035823998,0.0000058824044,0.0016476731,6.565017e-7,0.000017282506,1.05212756e-7,0.0011918012,3.0801124e-7,0.000060848593,0.9852441,0.000020364072,0.011807385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056449324,0.000102642894,0.007536375,0.00034218543,0.00004960967,0.000079525715,0.008709498,0.0000022271731,0.00068738067,0.6246173,0.3571266,0.00018218372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017003827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015150885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36062682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027165073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094619265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9655773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594711691","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6265-171-5_6","title":"Subjectivity Reflected in the Common Law Tradition","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"International criminal justice series","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Political science; Liability; Law; Law and economics; Strict liability; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07423204887761979,"score_gpt":0.3519077044679716,"score_spread":0.2776756555903518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594711691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031631615,0.000055785586,0.000017298626,0.002855782,0.0015531299,0.00021954239,0.000072542796,0.000045443165,0.9920173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69924045,0.000127838,0.000043470587,0.0006029977,0.001669177,0.000018060373,0.00017325616,0.000017271359,0.29810748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848026,0.000113477,0.0002561733,0.0002428078,0.00073755725,0.00016974927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990314,0.00018176608,0.00026755375,0.00024741492,0.00023315748,0.000038681817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048186205,0.00018992447,0.0001932452,0.00010260639,0.0012351408,0.0004627935,0.00078480714,0.00021834223,0.0005841685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007259548,0.00015562677,0.00010318868,0.0000107363485,0.00085594476,0.0007086827,0.00003001943,0.00043971598,0.00010005319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008327304,0.000026168796,0.0000017509485,0.000031782347,0.000020476195,0.00006615742,0.022160431,0.0000010434819,0.000006156092,0.9763005,0.0009354542,0.00036682127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013181061,0.00006576751,0.00054154894,0.0001301695,0.00026160842,0.000018652272,0.0038339642,0.0000026273676,0.000021736372,0.4512605,0.5435044,0.00022719117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045163124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2688338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6960773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000204057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016907387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94998294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606604158","doi":"10.29173/alr766","title":"The Impact of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on Canadian Jurisprudence: The Case of Leobrera v. Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Jurisprudence; Convention; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Political science; Law; Immigration policy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02344196393991993,"score_gpt":0.31477541669311404,"score_spread":0.2913334527531941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606604158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7556304,0.0021257852,8.310338e-8,0.038195863,0.0002404974,0.0014076255,0.00007324196,0.0000021617568,0.20232439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940571,0.00039459456,2.5292456e-7,0.00032409225,0.00003520977,0.000020230771,0.0000010189829,0.0000041715175,0.005163281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987824,0.00041390018,0.00022919572,0.000104996725,0.00028293737,0.00018659975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757725,0.0010495812,0.00037167303,0.00081668113,0.00012433561,0.000060501923],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006633655,0.00010310698,0.00019943468,0.0000058689034,0.0039104964,0.000057675425,0.0006965365,0.000028336097,0.00026962967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025258967,0.00003131516,0.00016456057,0.000065168635,0.0018722903,0.00008010383,0.00001536624,0.000113142785,0.0000027400845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004683426,0.000011240127,0.00028665882,0.000045574747,0.000039812414,0.0000013366678,0.0028561507,0.0000012730779,3.0235097e-7,0.9907378,0.0058766194,0.00013856094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023620464,0.0002622868,0.007297838,0.0034666446,0.00026123624,0.000019762994,0.0032990684,0.000010734545,0.00018919315,0.01010165,0.97460645,0.00024890952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9806361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012720587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010938717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773375824","doi":"","title":"The Legislative Protection of the Equal Employment Right of Individuals With Criminal Records Based on the International Human Rights Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Human rights; Political science; China; International human rights law; Criminal law","score_opus":0.04330643848592662,"score_gpt":0.30907632415722675,"score_spread":0.2657698856713001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773375824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24157582,0.0000015580248,0.000024134757,0.009978565,0.0005661547,0.00057250017,0.000031821397,0.000007129362,0.74724233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975032,1.6015969e-7,0.000009595973,0.00022626396,0.0002025841,0.000026158576,6.350027e-7,0.0000028973009,0.0020285025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982947,0.0001617586,0.00015388498,0.00016450044,0.0009576967,0.00026742954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989192,0.00007975136,0.00033630637,0.00027126737,0.0003056447,0.000087860564],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015610524,0.00007485598,0.00007938912,0.00004909555,0.018262183,0.00036162944,0.0015819323,0.000044225468,0.00013009433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009225091,0.00003450854,0.000052389016,0.00015920508,0.006554203,0.0002742854,0.000033586846,0.00013402206,0.0000027293722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004996241,0.000010298103,0.0008374827,6.1198597e-7,0.0000061217274,3.3119312e-7,0.010352222,9.320118e-7,0.00004505818,0.9882864,0.00026513948,0.00019044688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005409794,0.00026285113,0.064810425,0.0001156655,0.000046777866,4.6278387e-7,0.0049009435,0.000079907855,0.008094083,0.074164085,0.84665954,0.0003242844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29627678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9112721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9141223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000342435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010255323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99614936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784471017","doi":"","title":"Contiguous Territories: The Expanded Use of Expedited Removal in the Trump Era","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maryland Journal of International Law","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Statutory law; Statute; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Nationality; Immigration","score_opus":0.02908957385473279,"score_gpt":0.3044630830158671,"score_spread":0.27537350916113434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784471017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.945,0.00006863971,0.0000929286,0.0106699215,0.0025590188,0.00011432888,0.000009978424,0.000004897454,0.041480307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950748,0.000035901474,0.00013115777,0.0008953654,0.002306057,0.0000013812883,0.0000030116719,0.000003118329,0.0015491983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987094,0.00020302707,0.0003530948,0.00005462388,0.00058090914,0.000098947035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892527,0.0002934098,0.0002672208,0.000081932645,0.0004061305,0.000026017688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085327367,0.000056263558,0.00010795194,0.000063040025,0.00024161227,0.0001475728,0.00044893823,0.000040320414,0.00027896822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013071123,0.00002799959,0.00007620442,0.000074830336,0.000455991,0.0003771586,0.000014690871,0.00014076257,0.0000031899242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002798939,0.00010547106,0.0034057593,0.0000018432235,0.00006271002,0.00004793197,0.040758744,0.000003511791,0.00014937701,0.942078,0.012442047,0.000664737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006607461,0.00013027654,0.008881234,0.000047278572,0.0000113454535,0.000057166937,0.002756637,0.000022793598,0.00026744537,0.010876858,0.9762266,0.000061593564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003319381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019515557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9637846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003861982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008031817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784547933","doi":"10.29173/alr1321","title":"Evaluating Canada's New Immigration and Refugee Protection Act in Its Global Context","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Immigration; Refugee; Context (archaeology); Immigration law; Globalization; Political science; Law; Public administration; Refugee law; Geography","score_opus":0.05028816008434897,"score_gpt":0.3508174727034557,"score_spread":0.30052931261910676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784547933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4179912,0.19032302,0.00007908289,0.04168429,0.0014441052,0.008576719,0.000008263562,0.000090192756,0.33980316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900885,0.0027834838,0.0000434436,0.0022219552,0.00006700162,0.00004371392,0.0000049646214,0.000005328763,0.0047416105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986247,0.00044200273,0.0002717428,0.00019719324,0.00027137148,0.00019301151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995492,0.00006949315,0.00011222035,0.00010241157,0.000071620394,0.00009506198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067597564,0.00009707861,0.00019087257,0.000009105778,0.0003550645,0.00005407368,0.00007106359,0.000050728635,0.00031693807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004283632,0.00008347104,0.000028661781,0.00019391916,0.0000403962,0.0002482975,0.000005957804,0.00007388067,0.000023429395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022466195,0.0000075953467,0.00015753628,0.00010514626,0.0000047733843,6.9699223e-7,0.00043868172,5.4776547e-7,0.000005536801,0.9779184,0.00094269856,0.020416135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018845474,0.000024804742,0.0004257291,0.0006724236,0.000022296743,0.0000025608053,0.000053802196,0.000011751054,0.000029985802,0.0020204661,0.9964206,0.00012709887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9514179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99951637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025038634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008880054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34702495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899810747","doi":"","title":"Chapter 12. The Canadian Constitution and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: A Global Template for Minority Rights with Relevance to China?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitution; Charter; China; Relevance (law); Minority rights; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.017041182303086898,"score_gpt":0.2502122848255268,"score_spread":0.23317110252243992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899810747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006822066,0.00028856925,0.00038599933,0.03551737,0.001032293,0.003682859,0.0016630373,0.00003552962,0.9567121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8289154,0.00013476073,0.00041040278,0.0045364876,0.0016810065,0.00042428897,0.00043198277,0.000020433165,0.16344519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809,0.000082046994,0.00040130934,0.0005199241,0.00055481127,0.00035190748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809974,0.000168374,0.0004994643,0.00048405072,0.00044591675,0.00030247163],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076867733,0.00035450995,0.00046498032,0.00009462895,0.0060718236,0.0005518767,0.0004641049,0.00030064693,0.0005948022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004398352,0.00020425525,0.00010668339,0.000023987326,0.0038170672,0.0024475693,0.00005128137,0.00022551324,0.000060465456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018618812,0.000008169576,0.000005859474,0.000018409306,0.00006736546,0.000007017241,0.00090187014,0.0000015415015,3.8602795e-7,0.9941137,0.0044065043,0.00028302023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010828862,0.0001130309,0.0012524828,0.00022775236,0.00013796779,0.000017261384,0.000023866076,0.0000063188254,0.000009172786,0.31102285,0.68582344,0.00028295777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13467991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9788984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8442185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001817741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038774553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905905336","doi":"10.36646/mjlr.51.4.case","title":"The Case for Effective Environmental Politics: Federalist or Unitary State? Comparing the Cases of Canada, the United States of America, and the People’s Republic of China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Unitary state; Federalism; China; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Public administration; Law; Corporate governance; Economics","score_opus":0.009519139892229538,"score_gpt":0.22034238424181604,"score_spread":0.2108232443495865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905905336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963835,0.00007026478,0.000026367916,0.002248635,0.00004982995,0.000232451,0.000098717086,0.0000012101507,0.0008890238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993522,0.00009191595,0.000027738433,0.000068356065,0.000031905878,1.2357062e-7,0.0000036083798,0.0000032574656,0.00042086004],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999039,0.00028597392,0.0002498285,0.000053135285,0.00022877038,0.0001432755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809533,0.0008564212,0.00066321605,0.00012689081,0.00020722882,0.000050919563],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006646218,0.00007131514,0.00021970578,0.000037465354,0.0018914911,0.000017803564,0.00032755,0.000018811017,0.000017464583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004427343,0.00003018909,0.000077646,0.00009123644,0.0034730162,0.00012627312,0.00004939561,0.000105369734,3.6211716e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027203385,0.000148978,0.0013454843,0.000076876815,0.000785804,0.00007595583,0.6041113,0.00014034423,0.0000724018,0.38930997,0.0007206387,0.0004918696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035801788,0.0014589034,0.019451473,0.000121790596,0.00037992012,0.00034429925,0.89940244,0.000701165,0.0016957779,0.0065318854,0.066139236,0.00019290394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7912137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9622652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38277808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098299446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002572797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951574150","doi":"","title":"Protecting the Right to Privacy in Digital Devices: Reasonable Search on Arrest and at the Border","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Warrant; Supreme court; Reasonable suspicion; Law; Political science; Probable cause; Law enforcement; Agency (philosophy); State (computer science); Argument (complex analysis); Enforcement; Charter; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.012769962792165324,"score_gpt":0.30396910491220697,"score_spread":0.29119914212004167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951574150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95387435,0.0002597122,0.000093595656,0.026732685,0.000108818414,0.0003654035,4.292054e-7,0.000012946983,0.018552046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825961,0.00009479429,0.0000042435713,0.0005564613,0.0006132327,0.000009365937,3.7644506e-7,0.000007688857,0.016117759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979737,0.00024514447,0.00014276894,0.00014986334,0.0003526094,0.0011359126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994651,0.00019586408,0.000058804446,0.00012316325,0.00009661203,0.000060446233],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003625986,0.000081341466,0.0000750299,0.00004871082,0.0038126523,0.000330192,0.00032673014,0.000035017154,0.00016055441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021091232,0.000039488586,0.00002535603,0.0002216446,0.00032090864,0.0002644982,0.00004834802,0.00102737,0.000087455905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008943944,0.00003700036,0.0028578558,0.0000016857698,0.000030272804,0.0000021462247,0.044873215,0.0000083617215,0.00003617703,0.93811864,0.0009967224,0.012948461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003856672,0.00047385046,0.0028615312,0.00006374635,0.000007050026,0.000033157132,0.016984744,0.00001983356,0.0001221062,0.19570807,0.7831651,0.00017512565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012293885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22087498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7821684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054297986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007897231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99748427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998393555","doi":"","title":"The Chiarelli Doctrine: Immigration Exceptionalism and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Charter; Immigration; Persecution; Exceptionalism; Immigration law; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.010517589039680237,"score_gpt":0.30049612645179113,"score_spread":0.2899785374121109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998393555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90548295,0.00047313402,0.00004274049,0.03573649,0.00032363532,0.00035097657,0.0000035268927,0.000017236345,0.057569332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843862,0.000066840075,0.00001776635,0.00013982206,0.00040606048,0.0000067516603,0.0000018647706,0.0000021611609,0.014972531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994321,0.00010548504,0.00008383984,0.00008362797,0.00016253981,0.00013240839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958557,0.00009888223,0.000050343984,0.000097344324,0.00010111611,0.00006677048],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004743858,0.000049198617,0.000060572802,0.000025230202,0.002230003,0.0001150911,0.00008942943,0.000042113465,0.0001814284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015844542,0.00002453984,0.000017519167,0.000059187973,0.0018651838,0.000078802725,0.000008181487,0.000049004895,0.000017608756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009680794,0.0000018423913,0.00011314709,6.643722e-7,0.0000059987447,1.2110358e-7,0.055566914,4.5258815e-8,0.000013458273,0.940879,0.0032010144,0.00020810674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065476657,0.00004079845,0.013858359,0.000012403058,0.000020289115,0.0000016213534,0.004205779,0.00009482711,0.00016402606,0.14021263,0.84062016,0.00011435093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5431275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9814958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83741915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002052612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000085685075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014232915","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0043","title":"Treaty Failure or Treaty Constitutionalism? The Problematic Validity of the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Jurisprudence; Federalism; Constitutionalism; Constitution; Presumption; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Reinterpretation; Political science; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Philosophy; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.02510141922362404,"score_gpt":0.22622060910536207,"score_spread":0.20111918988173802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014232915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9026873,0.00029225062,0.00045202518,0.039981667,0.00018958277,0.0006193647,0.000053776446,0.000020651974,0.055703364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755746,0.0000641783,0.0001322931,0.00009815895,0.00007655631,7.6127456e-8,7.7701435e-7,0.0000014212276,0.0020690921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991476,0.00025714823,0.00012179499,0.00007506127,0.00030337466,0.00009500352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941504,0.00007481275,0.00020567117,0.00007808642,0.00014725105,0.00007914752],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000240331,0.00006318857,0.0001300971,0.000004374074,0.0015212159,0.00003572589,0.00027012968,0.00003865245,0.0015749735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021908481,0.000034028504,0.00009534755,0.000026143152,0.0009774824,0.00029433076,0.000038216862,0.00007670322,0.0000019425895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115653886,0.00009400821,0.008481354,0.00004049808,0.00014867178,0.000010669874,0.16812676,0.000042230702,0.000048733276,0.8181913,0.0039723613,0.0007277572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026266964,0.00031749904,0.030278264,0.00021776461,0.0005068509,0.000024115854,0.21777098,0.000077284814,0.00017417286,0.006370751,0.7413186,0.00031701848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1850617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9755993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81182057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001528603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028806253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015879930","doi":"10.1017/s0008423920000256","title":"Public Policy and Constitutional Rights in Times of Crisis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Parliament; Bill of rights; Human rights; Law and economics; Fundamental rights; Scope (computer science); Constitution; Public administration; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.04103138345894193,"score_gpt":0.30099970311706703,"score_spread":0.2599683196581251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015879930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68526876,0.0001275974,0.00028519807,0.16236658,0.00026029852,0.000111098336,0.00002693145,0.000005796052,0.15154773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983759,0.0000011109728,0.00012441984,0.0012108563,0.00023489833,1.6608993e-7,1.2151676e-7,6.8505904e-7,0.00005183465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988565,0.00005452183,0.00021685277,0.000083315055,0.00032023102,0.00046859132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976672,0.00006439081,0.000059412338,0.000033628796,0.0002729775,0.0019023763],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006047994,0.000040884897,0.0001089332,0.00030665853,0.00041718927,0.00010570447,0.00026530086,0.00003211226,0.0004727133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010772398,0.000032841886,0.000026326628,0.0005166459,0.008683943,0.0004673759,0.000008149468,0.00009322753,0.00000520061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.8614426e-7,0.0000035626185,0.0024296292,0.0000014372536,0.0000011098632,0.0000127788935,0.0016555275,6.3634707e-7,0.000012826471,0.99553704,0.00031235628,0.000032334137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005063862,0.00016051724,0.08006044,0.00004576813,0.000011190307,0.000038950453,0.002490022,0.000053347754,0.00051184034,0.78430635,0.13159165,0.0002235533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.111486465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15600131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31310713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024632344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011846045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99401385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3028193667","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-34324-8_11","title":"Evolving Conceptual and Policy Challenges","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IMISCOE research series","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Conceptual framework; Theme (computing); Political science; Set (abstract data type); Population; Focus (optics); Political economy; Economic geography; Sociology; Geography; Social science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.1958500621130574,"score_gpt":0.4093292570540123,"score_spread":0.2134791949409549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3028193667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000059484817,0.010711965,9.025116e-7,0.031050446,0.000091942726,0.00032228525,0.00002419906,0.000091302,0.9576475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0576789,0.02704628,0.0000532979,0.000112603964,0.0027400674,0.000017849958,0.000014618498,0.000043101674,0.91229326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758536,0.00021025958,0.00020101917,0.000421949,0.0010929247,0.0004884656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987692,0.00023070669,0.00006692565,0.00020727464,0.0004047563,0.0003210854],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078914315,0.00019921489,0.00029706128,0.0002321382,0.0015325367,0.0003572524,0.0003359736,0.0003079789,0.0014705518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003788328,0.00018169578,0.00006919711,0.000050081184,0.004165274,0.00042670025,0.00019166684,0.00065973145,0.00025699227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016146547,0.000003397494,7.708751e-7,0.00004534793,0.000027346174,0.000026020418,0.034943406,2.8939667e-8,0.0000074961904,0.9560789,0.0063335174,0.0025176636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006817924,0.000093862735,0.000016913646,0.00008796126,0.000004686591,0.0000013120641,0.004894229,3.2410617e-7,0.00001325712,0.23866025,0.7560046,0.00015444867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091605517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010537279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74967104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014731233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001148413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123962051","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the Application of Section 7 of the Charter in Immigration and Refugee Protection","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Refugee; Political science; Supreme court; Statute; Law; Statutory law; Charter; Immigration reform; Immigration detention; Immigration law; Context (archaeology); Immigration","score_opus":0.010306339737225036,"score_gpt":0.2741875309680102,"score_spread":0.26388119123078513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123962051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922759,0.0001464539,0.0025895045,0.003973877,0.00009907037,0.00026044587,2.342189e-7,0.0000032591242,0.00065128284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989281,0.00027073853,0.0000039131205,0.00000811981,0.0003962458,0.000008051719,1.9679098e-7,0.0000025220936,0.00038210972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999207,0.00015058153,0.00017132002,0.000061504885,0.00016235554,0.00024720037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993444,0.000013524079,0.00043082767,0.00012472305,0.00007791025,0.000008586191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021144862,0.000036103007,0.000060153798,0.000029456245,0.0011818166,0.00005051889,0.00015833118,0.00004085254,0.0000027566277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056399807,0.000020919817,0.000033106957,0.00005258791,0.00014319626,0.00024149092,0.000010471836,0.00037493,4.2885264e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019402152,0.000010064728,0.0071798,0.000007023222,0.000011529876,2.0676124e-8,0.0048579522,0.000005536348,0.004335003,0.92179483,0.0000023383072,0.061776496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008205614,0.00015425563,0.32748136,0.0001496757,0.00005052342,0.000029606766,0.01172877,0.0007936501,0.0036034554,0.6401654,0.01484431,0.00017841013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022069542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053312667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32030156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014732797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027742988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9639619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124333424","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2959","title":"As Good as it Gets? Security, Asylum, and the Rule of Law after the Certificate Trilogy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Principle of legality; Certificate; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Nexus (standard); Computer security; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02795184648206109,"score_gpt":0.28835343266763386,"score_spread":0.26040158618557274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124333424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04685502,0.00072229723,0.000033170094,0.067078896,0.0004046388,0.00022175474,0.00000853154,0.000017986356,0.8846577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899156,0.00039502326,0.000018584893,0.0019670138,0.00048820695,0.000011679095,3.9228644e-7,0.000010801404,0.0071926904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810857,0.00060204824,0.0003493108,0.00015803345,0.00046296924,0.00031906465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989005,0.00035444953,0.0002397658,0.00021554224,0.00016125536,0.00012854274],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015622845,0.00012185434,0.00021467317,0.000023314527,0.0017454085,0.00025526196,0.00042073624,0.00010428554,0.0016477595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053801312,0.000051122068,0.00014039114,0.000040758438,0.0020826785,0.00033382938,0.000059420538,0.00023232473,0.00017374211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017640735,0.00003247005,0.000039439965,0.00000254501,0.000041137915,0.000011690408,0.013037694,1.3734288e-7,0.00006101509,0.9858009,0.00036846945,0.00042805923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008647414,0.000046937115,0.00014123083,0.000028705792,0.000040186358,0.00005612823,0.0005335698,0.0000011324231,0.0004233061,0.68214244,0.31563666,0.00008498334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0327263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3240883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9430606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003353545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009048687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147535569","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6265-431-0_14","title":"Urbanization, Megacities, Constitutional Silence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"European yearbook of constitutional law","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Megacity; Urbanization; Geopolitics; Silence; Geography; Economic geography; Population; Urban agglomeration; Development economics; Political science; Economy; Economic growth; Sociology; Demography; Economics; Politics; Art; Law","score_opus":0.025119789458979348,"score_gpt":0.24172175971863438,"score_spread":0.21660197025965502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147535569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005856626,0.0012501539,0.001776611,0.00023364251,0.0007407629,0.0002221954,0.00027711428,0.00009467712,0.995399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10877009,0.00020049025,0.00045879174,0.00062023214,0.0013237997,0.0000027485314,0.00049277034,0.000023177052,0.8881079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997783,0.00015951593,0.0005434744,0.0003793989,0.00090564066,0.00022897102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828935,0.00013228098,0.00032323235,0.0002662691,0.0008407029,0.00014815468],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046302963,0.00025762056,0.00033131326,0.00010480379,0.0009135332,0.0001077336,0.00034623704,0.00016737678,0.011903749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076841,0.00027799615,0.00019525932,0.000043580894,0.019152889,0.00025377856,0.00007603673,0.0002798203,0.0009211526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006413139,0.000019936191,0.000004123352,0.000018439185,0.00006768647,0.0000729553,0.00030623237,0.000020240668,0.000015925109,0.9914281,0.007993123,0.000046851685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018415318,0.00001337497,0.000008037033,0.00031795868,0.000050829753,0.00001148471,0.000035482473,6.4914485e-7,0.000035716297,0.05610108,0.94294786,0.00029335642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006436229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025197686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.935327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000144977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025959006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200149901","doi":"10.1093/ijrl/eeab034","title":"Canadian Exclusion Jurisprudence post-<i>Febles</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Refugee Law","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Supreme court; Tribunal; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Immigration; Immigration law; Legitimacy; Refugee law; Citizenship; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.009279386059874866,"score_gpt":0.3034960275812762,"score_spread":0.2942166415214013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200149901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68522453,0.0009913719,0.00038830342,0.06655227,0.010779137,0.00012390404,0.000064995584,0.000037105987,0.23583837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99022454,0.00016524983,0.0004594101,0.0038703426,0.0012541784,5.25849e-7,0.000008329694,0.000006178344,0.004011265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985299,0.000111480724,0.00028763813,0.00009402207,0.0007813348,0.00019561466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761564,0.000057120425,0.00017812171,0.00007747907,0.0018431376,0.00022848633],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043623056,0.00006461557,0.00010510476,0.00010991802,0.0003974632,0.00021466307,0.00046001902,0.00006867294,0.0013163137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009978154,0.000057299858,0.00011227582,0.000083409956,0.00010997477,0.0005005211,0.000033572258,0.00016062782,0.00007548839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001493138,0.000029196062,0.0002613912,0.0000011460454,0.000034431676,0.00051142124,0.0016033849,0.000008317093,0.00055068475,0.9934015,0.0022144245,0.0013691521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002116442,0.000022162507,0.00061744015,0.000052585085,0.000009146772,0.00009223618,0.0002603948,0.0000020121881,0.0012208214,0.012756703,0.98467857,0.00007630333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0423358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75497526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98246413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039922865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001367446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287109501","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.5138023","title":"COVID-19 Immunity Certificates (Passports) as an Intergovernmental problem in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Virology; Political science; Business; Medicine; Outbreak","score_opus":0.04336311914585636,"score_gpt":0.27899174764772205,"score_spread":0.2356286285018657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287109501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6230613,0.000062028,0.00017320675,0.00908282,0.00020389566,0.0005321788,0.00017559865,0.00042558985,0.3662834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99458617,0.000039900908,0.0000531025,0.0006795456,0.00006321641,5.3068838e-8,0.00084984157,0.00021626834,0.0035119222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980112,0.000676458,0.00022172327,0.00028652887,0.00050077593,0.0003033295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902713,0.000025759975,0.00007634165,0.00026210217,0.00024229272,0.00036636577],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006629148,0.00008594116,0.00010089979,0.00006660547,0.003026179,0.00054883055,0.0006081531,0.000039583272,0.04872901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054288184,0.0000937026,0.000024192172,0.0003548254,0.00016811375,0.00034410748,0.00029121098,0.00019475592,0.00079463416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019587498,0.00084541,0.0006011378,0.00011870689,0.00007210215,0.0005264986,0.09180255,0.00015843115,0.0036052659,0.48628378,0.38494793,0.030842312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023633406,0.000037162237,0.0010150673,0.000008983858,0.0000034140337,0.000017942495,0.013999072,0.000024411975,0.00037280802,0.0014807641,0.9826798,0.00012425215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59915054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5816682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5977318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019479126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033325967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386139525","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197676189.003.0011","title":"Non-centralized Coordination during a Transboundary Crisis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Intergovernmentalism; Negotiation; Political science; Commission; Collective action; Member states; European union; Public administration; Action (physics); European commission; Business; International trade; Law","score_opus":0.025602210145663464,"score_gpt":0.2769917447660067,"score_spread":0.25138953462034325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386139525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005259673,0.00002539967,0.0000898874,0.0026131978,0.0006952445,0.000384828,0.000015777452,0.00035903088,0.9952907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042911287,0.00016478248,0.00003111384,0.00012298171,0.0004800388,0.000011245865,0.00005278083,0.000040496107,0.9561853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986727,0.00001978837,0.00026194018,0.0002813465,0.0004977446,0.0002664805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995013,0.000031639047,0.00009748701,0.0001462675,0.00012233891,0.00010097582],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021846351,0.00018237287,0.00023984489,0.0001628988,0.0010644823,0.00019320069,0.00018884556,0.00031181573,0.007971997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000050165936,0.00017060693,0.0001943244,0.00004083937,0.00017480008,0.00018972783,0.000012867395,0.00017800447,0.0013426037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008652145,0.0000058919277,0.0000016180713,0.000020956253,0.000035405246,0.000012170056,0.0060302676,3.5819215e-7,0.00000777466,0.97330296,0.020449813,0.00012414751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039750594,0.000013209798,0.00008710205,0.00006031925,0.000056735033,4.0914932e-7,0.00042737063,0.0000031241423,0.000037333935,0.11756888,0.8810085,0.0003394772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013718889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02090862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86055875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014240373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002069898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387245589","doi":"10.32920/24233101","title":"As Good as it Gets? Security, Asylum, and the Rule of Law after the Certificate Trilogy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Principle of legality; Certificate; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Waiver; Nexus (standard); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06673125998442891,"score_gpt":0.3330765059575456,"score_spread":0.2663452459731167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387245589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12612015,0.000497723,0.000016670347,0.111258395,0.0011468076,0.0011566541,0.000031583193,0.00012529921,0.7596467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90742654,0.0003291954,0.000009821762,0.0018441175,0.00029657868,0.000115348834,0.000009123024,0.000013274283,0.08995603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814683,0.0005144091,0.00034085228,0.00032790567,0.00042526395,0.00024472954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876004,0.00043533967,0.0001825742,0.00043969383,0.00012415973,0.00005816851],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014039825,0.00015983496,0.0003065086,0.00003739596,0.00068771275,0.00027073364,0.0005737947,0.00025584988,0.001718465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006281633,0.00007925972,0.00016801353,0.000053455165,0.0019713035,0.000070036185,0.00042924096,0.0003669521,0.00044317794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006367341,0.00001840516,0.00001859095,0.000017657527,0.000052580755,0.000003015035,0.05993355,0.0000010952286,0.0000011753451,0.9381367,0.0016942924,0.00005925068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002216814,0.000012699752,0.00028584572,0.000018108158,0.000052343283,7.286457e-7,0.0017804212,0.000011939031,0.000081681224,0.6772853,0.32013732,0.00011194926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06250141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15329385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7813064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023792898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018048627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387246063","doi":"10.32920/24233101.v1","title":"As Good as it Gets? Security, Asylum, and the Rule of Law after the Certificate Trilogy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Certificate; Principle of legality; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Nexus (standard); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06673125998442891,"score_gpt":0.3330765059575456,"score_spread":0.2663452459731167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387246063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12612015,0.000497723,0.000016670347,0.111258395,0.0011468076,0.0011566541,0.000031583193,0.00012529921,0.7596467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90742654,0.0003291954,0.000009821762,0.0018441175,0.00029657868,0.000115348834,0.000009123024,0.000013274283,0.08995603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814683,0.0005144091,0.00034085228,0.00032790567,0.00042526395,0.00024472954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876004,0.00043533967,0.0001825742,0.00043969383,0.00012415973,0.00005816851],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014039825,0.00015983496,0.0003065086,0.00003739596,0.00068771275,0.00027073364,0.0005737947,0.00025584988,0.001718465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006281633,0.00007925972,0.00016801353,0.000053455165,0.0019713035,0.000070036185,0.00042924096,0.0003669521,0.00044317794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006367341,0.00001840516,0.00001859095,0.000017657527,0.000052580755,0.000003015035,0.05993355,0.0000010952286,0.0000011753451,0.9381367,0.0016942924,0.00005925068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002216814,0.000012699752,0.00028584572,0.000018108158,0.000052343283,7.286457e-7,0.0017804212,0.000011939031,0.000081681224,0.6772853,0.32013732,0.00011194926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06250141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15329385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7813064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023792898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018048627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397033941","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54354-8_10","title":"Call It Democracy: The Slippage Amongst Rights, Laws, and Values in Canada During the Pandemic Era","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave socio-legal studies","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Slippage; Democracy; Pandemic; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Law; Medicine; Economics; Internal medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.021509271414794893,"score_gpt":0.27030631946100625,"score_spread":0.24879704804621136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397033941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079757735,0.06604661,0.0000013137189,0.04459115,0.0032777118,0.0021297594,0.00021695814,0.00022933155,0.80374944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6447564,0.0064228163,0.000002676982,0.00038161397,0.000738203,0.00003903087,0.000006390658,0.00002859399,0.3476243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975248,0.00016189321,0.00048663432,0.00050426787,0.00077924464,0.00054315274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860084,0.0006993578,0.00020082446,0.00026356647,0.00014685318,0.0000885822],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072212046,0.00044643309,0.000560204,0.000063431,0.0042708223,0.000263673,0.00045129267,0.00021922232,0.00013027994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044705706,0.00024056915,0.0001727403,0.00006542921,0.001745264,0.00006623971,0.00022522654,0.0010498168,0.000044762375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008165916,0.0000028358327,0.0010314828,0.00008046026,0.00045095253,0.00009068577,0.049125694,0.0000013573047,7.1522976e-7,0.9391287,0.00992347,0.00015548799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002102628,0.000013978007,0.0034968709,0.00026806706,0.00020510235,0.0000035802652,0.012520132,0.000003298488,0.0000016689777,0.49781707,0.48500964,0.00045033815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7627107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99741673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5649986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012172253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070180313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401420862","doi":"10.69970/gjlhd.v11i1.1250","title":"The Canadian Residential School System: An International Law Failure","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith journal of law and human dignity.","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.026983564223410375,"score_gpt":0.304515531010249,"score_spread":0.2775319667868386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401420862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59244853,0.0000747115,0.0000046869163,0.004524458,0.0016364335,0.00020454788,0.00001811032,0.00007572318,0.40101278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934373,0.000019984775,0.00001504958,0.00029165798,0.0016957961,0.000002249431,0.000007691966,0.000008706255,0.0045215464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985346,0.00020644699,0.00032324452,0.0001068817,0.00054486276,0.00028396142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884427,0.000057913883,0.00019183499,0.00011384916,0.00037395762,0.0004181752],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012974024,0.00008825517,0.00013021649,0.00012387257,0.00564794,0.0012608073,0.00045476563,0.00008634537,0.00014785457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029308037,0.0000611223,0.00006874775,0.000085714826,0.0005235915,0.0008078834,0.000022411885,0.00025817525,0.00005264785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009156853,0.0000074244504,0.0003737722,0.000004080949,0.000032362255,0.000050024617,0.00261223,0.000002198857,0.000015097158,0.99365646,0.003201802,0.00003542079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052773004,0.000106472995,0.013039855,0.00007700672,0.000040970044,0.00003547915,0.0043356633,0.0000037845414,0.000029007235,0.04790274,0.9337329,0.00016838641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16471896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9810284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9457537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015925482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037609533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414326927","doi":"10.32920/30158056","title":"Persistent Discord: The Adjudication of National Security Deportation Cases in Canada (2018–2020)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Adjudication; Terrorism; Tribunal; National security; Abandonment (legal); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.025342603151918816,"score_gpt":0.2965493266795638,"score_spread":0.27120672352764497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414326927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8064034,0.0003866646,0.00009334327,0.008812018,0.0015357867,0.0010506894,0.00022654762,0.000028893292,0.18146265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633485,0.000080930346,0.000031311472,0.00017196998,0.00009899318,0.000046109173,0.0001360266,0.0000021030348,0.0030976883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984951,0.00017433777,0.00035084639,0.0001973758,0.0006637725,0.00011859442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990928,0.00020141872,0.00024793379,0.00014126561,0.00028589615,0.000030675074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042908586,0.00008787483,0.00013615025,0.0000574801,0.00025713435,0.000035338067,0.00024617498,0.0000788292,0.0003537714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015268149,0.00006514509,0.00007728993,0.00012956753,0.000114196104,0.00006822115,0.00005641217,0.00017709969,0.000001509537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012884363,0.00007142275,0.013734918,0.00009179052,0.00006155641,0.0000064481355,0.019390544,0.0014640864,0.0000014075143,0.94770545,0.01709677,0.00036273303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000959601,0.00006843716,0.30739608,0.00073072687,0.00028847656,0.0000061206515,0.12166757,0.005408335,0.00031414905,0.44594276,0.11572268,0.0014950639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9909742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99980664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5017627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008583511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009364729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W642609930","doi":"","title":"Human rights and the effluxion of time; Canada's Chinese immigration act as illustrative of the need for judicial remedies for human rights violations of the distant past","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Durham e-Theses (Durham University)","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Durham University; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Legislature; Law; Underpinning; Fundamental rights; Immigration; International human rights law; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.007013365171991841,"score_gpt":0.2660902635182155,"score_spread":0.25907689834622366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W642609930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708756,0.00003071999,0.000049044284,0.00033291147,0.0004813023,0.0024989336,0.00025922165,0.00001736214,0.025454858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96803826,0.0000043581904,0.000013409805,0.000013297106,0.00024015896,0.000011079831,0.00025726907,0.000015885804,0.031406283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978533,0.0003386242,0.000562032,0.0003123634,0.0006529657,0.00028070598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967797,0.00066092936,0.0012624466,0.00035604948,0.0008768272,0.00006408104],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005144311,0.000304721,0.0005588181,0.00023018489,0.0043845247,0.000038459104,0.0006750489,0.0002756221,0.00005700683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000101162885,0.00016841927,0.00039284021,0.00052219664,0.0011437046,0.00020867346,0.00004155759,0.0002100217,2.8514145e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007702797,0.00012356529,0.00042243945,0.00014336314,0.00028496544,0.0000010026541,0.034018964,0.000020609345,0.0018298473,0.9613637,0.0009870135,0.000034293123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015782882,0.0014235999,0.13238806,0.002795548,0.004742787,0.0000036839403,0.07581808,0.00030702303,0.048791915,0.43346643,0.28165048,0.002829499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3833254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9802249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59689945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002174112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006423449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99691164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008388210","doi":"","title":"Catherine Dauvergne, Humanitarianism, Identity and Nation : Migration Laws in Canada and Australia, Vancouver, UBC Press, 2005","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Persée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche)","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); National identity; Immigration; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.061717080705489404,"score_gpt":0.33397905710970555,"score_spread":0.2722619764042161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008388210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4053089,0.0023001297,0.00037515393,0.0016503336,0.0008415688,0.0019908103,0.0003220648,0.0002692439,0.5869418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1774689,0.0023308746,0.0018182503,0.0005481488,0.00049468025,0.00011935519,0.00021271661,0.00018743474,0.81681967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639857,0.0016767356,0.00037525131,0.0005003504,0.00052878,0.0005203194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989231,0.00038528873,0.00025299913,0.00022121772,0.0000596979,0.00015769391],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022270237,0.00034456386,0.00035368843,0.00015451266,0.00028471067,0.00027748247,0.00023589184,0.00069201837,0.000720664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017216346,0.00037908857,0.000051137307,0.00012037309,0.00026106468,0.00028777117,0.00004941924,0.0006247005,0.0000038992625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032254502,0.0001616506,0.0039651883,0.00019527873,0.00007310852,0.000099178105,0.10742748,0.0000127287385,0.00008305072,0.049020223,0.838567,0.00036285826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005880403,0.00003153372,0.004483061,0.000102968035,0.00006238903,0.000003355843,0.003556833,0.000026703427,0.000022407037,0.0027662201,0.987933,0.00042350215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99674654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22987787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023252536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022529748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113484492","doi":"","title":"A Roof Over Our Heads: Rights Or Real Estate?","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Right of way; Right to the city; Poverty; International human rights law","score_opus":0.027476273721721803,"score_gpt":0.3125509028945303,"score_spread":0.2850746291728085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113484492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.681327,0.00014584365,0.000017510793,0.005094188,0.0059431707,0.0013889449,0.00017961267,0.0010920779,0.3048117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7641048,0.0014414447,0.00012649626,0.00069140224,0.0030602973,0.00007770609,0.000077504,0.0000670559,0.23035333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993686,0.00074506487,0.0010434375,0.0011570703,0.0016268782,0.0017415547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717987,0.00023679122,0.00038649468,0.00085948297,0.00029510388,0.0010422572],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014005003,0.00063161255,0.0007562099,0.00024384998,0.00438972,0.001149256,0.0010072212,0.0005691063,0.010261897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001003003,0.00050102256,0.0004235785,0.0015620273,0.0005959226,0.0016125541,0.00019672423,0.0007342733,0.018430082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028830956,0.00031617342,0.00047860376,0.00008784829,0.00017789341,0.0004832314,0.02433649,0.00005002589,0.00013622802,0.8169479,0.15526818,0.001429148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014917485,0.0003085161,0.0029045842,0.00016504094,0.00010502659,0.0000051370625,0.00400124,0.0001659459,0.0003563875,0.032921586,0.9566228,0.00095203624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08590865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5189101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8013546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038241546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009128992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139604900","doi":"","title":"Kansalliset intressit Yhdysvaltain Kiina-politiikassa. Retorinen tutkimusYhdysvaltain harjoittaman engagement-politiikan suhteesta maan kansallisiin intresseihin","year":2000,"lang":"fi","type":"dissertation","venue":"Trepo - Institutional Repository of Tampere University","topic":"Immigration Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Spare time; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.017034672462206482,"score_gpt":0.25585208369378515,"score_spread":0.23881741123157868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139604900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7957558,0.00045193644,0.000060212144,0.0005820864,0.0028388477,0.0012734678,0.00084412796,0.00029327508,0.19790022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7982324,0.000681807,0.0003103792,0.00009454402,0.0014654386,0.0000119816905,0.003833296,0.00007681642,0.19529338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98977834,0.0021962312,0.0019005456,0.0019830859,0.0026494057,0.0014923996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942367,0.0005233228,0.0014707951,0.001294962,0.0015200875,0.00095413154],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012415779,0.0013358943,0.001587059,0.0011541328,0.0075755515,0.0004475196,0.002253717,0.0014743507,0.002954613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002787605,0.0015430496,0.0010331144,0.0010545059,0.003178257,0.0020785015,0.00023466736,0.001722707,0.00025585134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032197349,0.0024087683,0.0062603317,0.0014416655,0.0015747158,0.002736772,0.054386362,0.0015396649,0.002016072,0.91185,0.011125809,0.0014401027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031360362,0.00051391544,0.032400846,0.0019528058,0.0014344169,0.00007346574,0.034367375,0.0002265678,0.0052178795,0.0026445428,0.9153492,0.0026829368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043916225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01864885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90920544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002447425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061474433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}